The URL can be used to link to this page

Public Works Packet 2017 10-17-17 AGENDA PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, October 17, 2017 6:00 p.m. City Hall Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL Citizen Comments: Minutes for Correction/Approval: September 19, 2017 New Business: 1. PW 2017-65 104 N. Bridge Street Development Agreement 2. ADM 2017-70 Building Conditions Survey Results 3. PW 2017-66 Capital Improvement Project Update 4. PW 2017-67 Quarterly Bond/LOC Reduction Summary 5. PW 2017-68 Meeting Schedule for 2018 6. PW 2017-69 2018 Road to Better Roads Program – Engineering Agreement 7. PW 2017-70 Letter of Intent – IDOT Improvement of US 30 from IL 47 to IL 31 8. PW 2017-71 Traffic Control Signs – Sunflower Estates Area 9. PW 2017-72 Windett Ridge – Acceptance of Improvements 10. PW 2017-73 ITEP Project Selection 11. PW 2017-74 Verizon Site Access Agreement – 610 Tower Lane Old Business: 1. PW 2017-63 Ordinance Amending the Water Use and Service Regulations 2. PW 2014-74 Railroad Quiet Zones Additional Business: 2017/2018 City Council Goals – Public Works Committee Goal Priority Staff “Municipal Building Needs and Planning” 5 Bart Olson & Eric Dhuse “Vehicle Replacement” 6 Bart Olson & Eric Dhuse “Water Planning” 8 Eric Dhuse & Brad Sanderson “Capital Improvement Plan” 11 Bart Olson & Eric Dhuse “Water Conservation Plan” 15 Eric Dhuse & Brad Sanderson United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 www.yorkville.il.us UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE Tuesday, October 17, 2017 6:00 PM CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. September 19, 2017 □ Approved __________ □ As presented □ With corrections --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2017-65 104 N. Bridge Street Development Agreement □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. ADM 2017-70 Building Conditions Survey Results □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. PW 2017-66 Capital Improvement Project Update □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. PW 2017-67 Quarterly Bond/LOC Reduction Summary □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. PW 2017-68 Meeting Schedule for 2018 □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. PW 2017-69 2018 Road to Better Roads Program – Engineering Agreement □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. PW 2017-70 Letter of Intent – IDOT Improvement of US 30 from IL 47 to IL 31 □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. PW 2017-71 Traffic Control Signs – Sunflower Estates Area □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. PW 2017-72 Windett Ridge – Acceptance of Improvements □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. PW 2017-73 ITEP Project Selection □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. PW 2017-74 Verizon Site Access Agreement – 610 Tower Lane □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OLD BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2017-63 Ordinance Amending the Water Use and Service Regulations □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PW 2014-74 Railroad Quiet Zones □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Minutes Tracking Number Minutes of the Public Works Committee – September 19, 2017 Public Works Committee – October 17, 2017 Majority Committee Approval Minute Taker Name Department Page 1 of 3 DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE Tuesday, September 19, 2017, 6:00pm Yorkville City Hall, Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road IN ATTENDANCE: Committee Members Chairman Joel Frieders Alderman Ken Koch Alderman Jackie Milschewski Alderman Seaver Tarulis Other City Officials City Administrator Engineer Brad Sanderson, EEI Interim Assistant City Administrator Erin Willrett Public Works Director Eric Dhuse Alderman Chris Funkhouser Other Guests: Matt Weiss, Terracon Julie Schlichting, Imperial Investments The meeting was called to order at 6:00pm by Chairman Joel Frieders. New Business: (out of sequence) 7. PW 2017-64 Overview of Downtown Brownfields Matt Weiss from Terracon opened the discussion and said his company is evaluating the Riverfront Park and Grainco sites to determine if they meet the program requirements for remediation. The Brownfield status was initiated in 2005 when a grant became available for environmental assessment. Groundwater was tested and petroleum impacts were found in front of Grainco where there was a previous fueling station. Heavy metals including lead were also found in fill material. A work plan was submitted to EPA and approved by them. The site is now enrolled in a remediation program and the City is waiting on a development plan from Imperial Investments. Mr. Weiss said there are two types of remediation: industrial and residential and the site was evaluated using the residential standards. It was also noted that the park site is not included in the Brownfield project. Mr. Koch asked if there are grants available for the cleanup if needed, in the second TIF. A revolving loan fund is also available through the EPA. There is no penalty to keep the Brownfield project open, however, new regulations could be introduced and EPA purges their list of projects after 5 years if there is no action. Mr. Olson recommended staying in a “holding pattern” at this time unless the State moves to purge the list. When the project is Page 2 of 3 finished, the State issues an “NFR” letter which releases the City from further liability. Mr. Weiss said that the three properties were bundled for remediation because private owners are not eligible for grants. The City can also proceed with just their portion if they wish. Alderman Funkhouser suggested a public/private partnership for the remediation and requested cost estimates. Mr. Olson said the cost in 2012 was $600,000 to $700,000. Citizen Comments: None Previous Meeting Minutes: July 18, 2017 The minutes were approved on a unanimous voice vote. New Business: 1. PW 2017-58 Water Department Reports for April, May and June 2017 Mr. Dhuse noted that since this report is for the summer months, the usage is higher. These reports move to the Council consent agenda. 2. PW 2017-59 Autumn Creek Unit 2C Acceptance Pulte requested acceptance of the unit north of Kennedy Road. All punchlist items are done and Mr. Sanderson recommended acceptance. There is a 1-year maintenance period for any other items that might surface. Lighting issues that Alderman Tarulis had brought forward are being addressed. This moves to the Council consent agenda. 3. PW 2017-60 Kennedy Road Shared Use Path (ITEP) – Authorization Nos. 1 and 2 Two change orders were received with one being for a warning system for pedestrians at the railroad and the other is for unstable materials which required extra excavation. The City's cost is 20% of the $8,000 overage, but the project is still below the budget and state agreement. Also discussed was the high cost of the vinyl plastic marking material near the tracks. These change orders move to the consent agenda. 4. PW 2017-61 Road to Better Roads Programs for 2018 An outline for next year's program was presented early to take advantage of low bids. Several streets were listed for repair consideration. The Council will need to adopt the suggested roads for repair so bids can be started. Mr. Sanderson also recommended an update of the road study which was last done in 2012. This moves to the Council consent agenda. 5. PW 2017-62 Traffic Control Review a. Blackberry Woods Four intersections were studied for possible traffic control devices and Cannonball at John and Independence streets were recommended for stop signs. b. Autumn Creek area No changes in signage were recommended. This report will move forward to the Council consent agenda. Page 3 of 3 6. PW 2017-63 Water Ordinance Ms. Willrett said the water ordinance has been thoroughly reviewed by staff and the attorney and some changes have been recommended including: changes in fees based on EEI studies, new multi-tenant buildings will have separate meters with the landlord being ultimately responsible for charges (older units not required to retrofit when there is only one meter) and increase in turn-on fees. She also provided a comparison of all changes. The committee was OK with these and this moves to the regular Council agenda. 7. PW 2017-64 Overview of Downtown Brownfields (discussed earlier) 8. ADM 2017-70 Building Conditions Survey Results Ms. Willrett reported on the survey and said EMG met with staff regarding all aspects of city structures. The data will be compiled into an on-line portal. Alderman Frieders suggested this survey be kept on the agenda each month and Alderman Milschewski asked for a breakdown by building. Mr. Olson said there are 10 buildings to consider. The committee discussed various methods of reviewing the volume of data, some of which are life-safety issues. Alderman Funkhouser suggested a joint meeting of Public Works and Administration next month. This topic will also be discussed at the goal-setting meeting. Mr. Olson said they will bring an easy and difficult topic to discuss. Old Business: 1. PW 2017-49 Selection of YBSD Liaison Joe Plocher was selected to be the YBSD liaison and Jackie Milschewski will be the liaison for the library. Additional Business: Alderman Milschewski asked if the City could install stops signs with blinking lights at Heustis and Van Emmon. Mr. Dhuse said they are solar powered and cost $1,600 each. It was also noted there is a sight distance issue due to an overgrown evergreen at that location. Alderman Tarulis noted increased use of the Kennedy Road path and suggested more trees on top of the berms. It was noted by Alderman Frieders that Autumn Creek Boulevard at Rt. 34 will be shut down to all traffic except emergency vehicles. He also noted the traffic light at Rt. 47 and Galena has been blinking recently causing traffic backups. It is the State's responsibility and they have been notified. There was no further business and the meeting was adjourned at 7:51pm. Minutes respectfully transcribed by Marlys Young, Minute Taker Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number New Business #1 Tracking Number PW 2017-65 104 N. Bridge Street Development Agreement Public Works Committee – October 17, 2017 N/A Majority Approval See attached memo. Bart Olson Administration Name Department Summary Consideration of a public private partnership through a development agreement for the construction and use of various improvements to Clark Park. Background This item was last discussed at the October Economic Development Committee meeting. At that meeting, the committee reviewed the rezoning and variance application for the property and a memo on the basics of a public private partnership with the developer (memo attached). Generally, the committee was in favor of the rezoning and variance application. Those applications will be in front of the Planning and Zoning Commission on Wednesday, October 18th and the City Council on Tuesday, October 24th. The committee was open to the basic concept of putting a parking lot in a portion of Clark Park, and was generally ok with the outline of the public private partnership, subject to clarification on the exact commitments being solidified. At that EDC meeting, the City staff and developer were planning on bringing the public private partnership agreement to the November EDC meeting, pending approval of the rezoning and variance application at the October 24th City Council meeting. After the meeting, the developer requested a tighter timeline (concurrent with the rezoning and variance applications) for negotiation of the public private partnership. As a result, City staff have been discussing the terms of the agreement with the developer and have reached a point where we agree upon the majority of the important sections of the development agreement. Because of the requested timeline and the majority of the agreement being related to Public Works and Parks and Recreation issues, we brought this agreement to the Public Works Committee. The agreement is broken into three main parts: developer commitments, City commitments, and mutual understandings. Given the timeline of the agreement, the developer’s expertise in ecological improvement projects, his willingness to dedicate private resources to the improvement of the park for the public at some point in the future, and the complex nature of some of the proposals, the mutual understandings sections contains a couple proposals that really only memorialize a commitment on both parties to discuss and debate the ideas in the future. To the extent that both parties mutually agree to proceed with them, subsequent agreements and authorizations may be needed. The three main parts of the agreement listed above deal with four main components of the public private partnership: the creation of a parking lot and driveway within a portion of Clark Park; the extension of new water and sewer service lines to the subject property; the use of the park by the developer for weddings and ceremonies; and various improvements to the natural areas of the park that will improve the ecological features of the park and provide new features for the public. The memo put forth at the October EDC meeting was organized in this four-part fashion. However, the development agreement drafted by Attorney Orr is set up by the developer commitments, the City commitments, and the mutual understandings – and this is the order this memo will use to further illustrate the agreement. Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: October 11, 2017 Subject: 104 N Bridge St development agreement Developer Obligations (Section 2) 1) Section 2Ai, 2Aii, and 2Aii state that the developer agrees to demolish the existing home at the 104 N Bridge St property, agrees to submit for the necessary approvals for the restaurant use, and to complete construction of the entire project by September 2019. 2) Section 2B state the developer agrees to fund 50% of the cost of the parking lot, up to $75,000. The exact layout and specs will be decided upon by the City at a later date. Currently, the Park Board is set to review a layout which winds amongst the trees vs. a rectangular, condensed layout. I would request feedback on those two layouts at the Public Works Committee and the City Council meeting – although the exact layout can be approved by the City at a later date. 3) Section 2C commits the developer to 50% funding, up to $25,000, for improvements to the shelter and adjacent area. The actual improvements and layout will be mutually agreed upon by the City and the developer at a later date. In concept, we would like to clear a larger, flat area north of the shelter, extend the retaining wall south of the shelter near the river bank, and possibly put a split rail fence on the north end of the park to replace the metal pole and string fence. The result of this is that the developer would be able to comfortably accommodate wedding ceremonies with attendance counts similar to the capacity of his banquet hall, and the City would have a larger shelter and surrounding area for the public to use for fishing, picnics, and small gatherings. The developer and the City’s Parks and Recreation Director and Superintendent of Parks are meeting to discuss their mutual ideas for improvements on Thursday, October 12th in the morning. We may have more information to present by the time the Public Works Committee meets on Tuesday, October 17th. The details on how each party will contribute (i.e. in house staff, purchase of materials, other costs) will be decided at a later date. The initial thought from the developer was that the City could purchase the materials and the developer would agree to do all of the installation work. 4) The latter part of Section 2C also commits the developer to performing annual maintenance of a naturalized area throughout the southern end of the park, at no cost to the City, for a period of five years. This will generally consist of the same maintenance (nuisance weed abatement, two prescribed burns, other improvements) that the City receives on naturalized areas elsewhere in town. This is a commitment worth $27,000. City Obligations 5) Section 3A outlines that the City will construct a new parking lot on or adjacent to Clark Park, and will grant the developer use of 48 spaces on Friday between 4pm and midnight, Saturday between 4pm and midnight, and all day Sunday. The park currently has 8 on-street parking spaces, and depending on the layout and amount of parking spaces ultimately decided upon by City Council, the City agrees to the developers use of 48 spaces. If the City adds more spaces in or adjacent to the park, the spaces can be fully available for public use. In the first draft of the winding layout of the parking lot, the outline has 40 spaces total. I have directed staff to come up with options to add more parking spaces through two different layouts. The use of the parking spaces will generally be offset by the developers 50% contribution to the cost of the parking lot. When we’ve looked at other parking use agreements from public and private entities, we feel the value of the $75,000 over a 20-year period is reasonable. 6) Section 3B outlines that the developer will have the unilateral option to extend the use of the 48 parking spaces for 20 years for an annual fee as listed in Exhibit C. The aggregate value of those fees over 20 years is $112,000. 7) Section 3C obligates the City to access across the parking lot and driveway into 104 N Bridge property. This would take the form of a formal agreement approved by both parties at a later date. 8) Section 3D obligates the City to upsize the water and sewer service lines to the 104 N Bridge St property, in an amount not to exceed $50,000. EEI’s quick estimate of these improvements are $48,000. HR Green’s estimate (on behalf of the developer) were closer to the $30,000 range. Any cost overruns on the water and sewer service line will be covered by the developer. There is a good chance some of this work can be completed in-house by the City. This section also makes it clear that we’ll reapprove a utility easement for the service lines (there is currently an easement for service lines across the park). While not specifically addressed in Section 3D, later sections of the development agreement indicate that the City’s cost of this component will be recouped through a business district tax. 9) Section 3E obligates the City to 40 rentals per year of the shelter area or a portion of the park for weddings or ceremonies. The developer must keep the ceremonies to a defined geographic area (defined in Exhibit D) and must keep the ceremonies to 3 hours. If the ceremonies extend beyond 3 hours, the additional cost to the developer is $65 for two additional hours (this matches our Park Rental Policy). If the developer needs more than 40 rentals per year of the shelter area or a portion of the park, the cost to the developer is $65 for five hours (this matches our Park Rental Policy). The developer will have the ability to put in the dates for the 40 rentals on September 1st of each year, for rentals occurring for the following year. After September 1st of each year, the public may book the park according to our park rental policy. All of the developer’s 40 park rentals must be after 4pm, which gives unfettered use of the park to the public and groups wishing to use the shelter area during the day. 10) Section 3F obligates the City to an easement for a business monument sign, either at the southeast corner of E Main and 47 or near the entrance to the driveway off of E Main St. The developer will be responsible for all costs associated with the installation of the sign. 11) All of Section 4 obligates the City to the creation of a business district to assist the developer with costs associated with development of the 104 N Bridge St property. This business district will have a 1% sales tax on top of the normal sales tax rates in the City. The developer has requested this 1% sales tax to be in place for the full 23 years possible of a business district, and has agreed that the City shall be entitled to 50% of the business district taxes to offset the cost of the water and sewer service lines installed by the City. Once the City’s costs for those lines are received (expected 4-7 years), the developer has requested the full 1% for the remainder of the business district. This business district sales tax is similar to the 1% imposed on the Imperial Investments west alley propreties. The business district would only be on the 104 N Bridge St property. Mutual Understandings 12) Section 5A states the City will be responsible for all maintenance within the parking lots on the Clark Park property. 13) Section 5B states the developer is responsible for all maintenance on the water and sewer service lines across the Clark Park property. The developer is responsible for all future upsizing or replacement of those service lines. 14) Section 5D states the developer would like to voluntarily clean up, landscape, and/or naturalize portions of the river island immediately south of the Clark Park property. To the extent that the City has the authority to permit this, we’re agreeing to explore the legal authority and the permission to do so in the future. 15) Section 5E states the developer might desire to install a cantilevered deck on the east side of the building. This depends on the engineering and site plans for the property which will not be submitted for several months. To the extent that the developer wishes to install a cantilevered deck a few feet above the western edge of the Clark Park property, the City would agree to explore the legal authority to do so. This may take the form of granting air rights to the developer. 16) Section 5F states the development of both the 104 N Bridge St property and the Clark Park parking lot will likely require stormwater improvements to both sites. To the extent that is true, there may be efficiencies for both parties to put in one large raingarden or swale on one or both properties and share in the installation and ongoing maintenance of said rain garden. This would require approval by both parties in the future. 17) Section 5G allows the developer to reduce the business district tax percentage or eliminate the business district after the City is made whole for the cost of the water and sewer service line costs. 18) Section 5H obligates the developer to giving the City an easement along the riverfront on the subject property, in an exact location and width to be determined at a later date. The developer has requested that the easement area remain under private control and access until the City is actually ready to build a sidewalk/trail/riverwalk across the 104 N Bridge property and has a connection point to a sidewalk/trail/riverwalk at both ends of the property. Sections Still Under Discussion (which may be added at a later date) 19) The developer is open to restricting the future use of the property through granting the City approval for assignment of the agreement (and parking lot access). The City will be presenting the developer with a list of permitted land-uses in the assumed B-2 zoning district for inclusion in an exhibit of the agreement, and the City and the developer will review acceptable language. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the agreement. 1 REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF 104 NORTH BRIDGE STREET, UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS THIS REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is entered into this ____ day of _________, 2017, by and between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, an Illinois municipal corporation (the “City”) and ___________________________________ (the “Developer”). PREAMBLES WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”) is a duly organized and validly existing municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Illinois and a non-home rule municipality pursuant to the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970; and, WHEREAS, the City has the authority pursuant to the laws of the State of Illinois, to promote the health, safety, and welfare of its inhabitants, to prevent the spread of blight, to encourage private development in order to enhance the tax base, to increase job opportunities, and to enter into contractual agreements with third parties for the purpose of achieving these purposes; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Business District Development and Redevelopment Law of the State of Illinois, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.3-1 et seq., as from time to time amended (the “BDD Act”), the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County (“Corporate Authorities”) are empowered to undertake the development or redevelopment of business districts within the municipal boundaries of the City which are in need of revitalization and to incur costs and to make and enter into all contracts necessary or incidental the development and redevelopment of a designated business district; and, Comment [bo1]: Owner / operator language still yet to be defined. 2 WHEREAS, the Developer has submitted a proposal to the City to redevelop the property commonly known as 104 North Bridge Street (the “Subject Property”) to demolish the existing residential structure located thereon and to construct a commercial building with surface parking for use as a restaurant and banquet hall (the “Project”); and, WHEREAS, the Developer has advised the City that in order to proceed with the Project, the Developer shall require assistance in providing access to additional parking for the peak hours of operation of the restaurant and banquet hall; construction of new sanitary and water service lines to service the Subject Property; and, use of and improvements to the Ron Clark Park shelter and surrounding areas; and, WHEREAS, the Developer has also informed the City that a considerable investment is required to undertake the redevelopment of the Subject Property and develop the Project and without additional financial assistance from the City, the Project cannot proceed; and, WHEREAS, the City proposes to implement the BDD Act for an area legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the “BD District”) which includes the Subject Property in order to address the blighting factors which have prevented private development from developing, redeveloping and revitalizing this area; and, WHEREAS, the establishment of a BD District and the implementation of the BDD Act shall empower the City to impose a retailers’ occupation tax and a service occupation tax (the “BD Taxes”) in the amount not to exceed of one percent (1%) on all commercial operations within the boundaries of the BD District to be used to pay certain costs incurred in connection with the planning, execution and implementation of a proposed Business District Plan (the “BD Plan”) which qualify as Business District Project Costs as defined by the BDD Act; and, 3 WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have determined that the Project would enhance the City’s downtown business district, generate substantial commercial activity, provide job opportunities and improve the tax base of the City and all affected taxing districts and therefore are prepared to enter into this public/private partnership pursuant to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, agree as follows: Section 1. Incorporation of Preambles. The Parties agree that the recitals contained in the Preambles to this Agreement are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into this Agreement as though they were fully restated in this Section. Section 2. Project Components, Developer’s Obligations. A. The Developer hereby states and affirms that the Project to be developed on the Subject Property shall include the following components: (i) demolition of the existing residential structure on the Subject Property; (ii) submission of a plan for the construction of a commercial building for use as a restaurant and banquet facility and application for all zoning and variance approvals as may be required; (iii) construction of a commercial building in accordance with the approved plan and all applicable City codes and ordinances and completion thereof on or before September 30, 2019. B. In order to provide additional parking during peak hours of operation of the restaurant and banquet hall, the Developer agrees to reimburse the City the lesser of: (i) fifty percent (50%) of the costs incurred by the City for the construction of a new parking lot, including but not limited to site preparation, striping, paving, lighting, rain gardens or 4 stormwater improvements, sidewalks and trail alignment, adjacent to the Subject Property to serve the Ron Clark Park; or, (ii) $75,000, on the condition that the Developer be granted limited use thereof as provided in Section 3A. and 3C. of this Agreement. C. In order to permit the Developer the use of the shelter and surrounding areas (the “Park Facilities”) located at Ron Clark Park, the Developer agrees to contribute for any improvements mutually determined necessary to this area in an amount equal to the lesser of: (i) fifty percent (50%) of the cost; or, (ii) $25,000. The terms, conditions and limitations of the Developer’s use of the Park Facilities are provided in Section 3E. of this Agreement. The Developer further agrees to maintain, at the Developer’s sole cost, such area at the Ron Clark Park which has been ecologically cleared (“Naturalized Area”) by the City. The Developer’s obligation to maintain the Naturalized Area shall be for a period of five years commencing from the date of such clearing by the City. Section 3. City Obligations. A. In consideration of the payment by the Developer of fifty percent (50%) of the cost of the construction of a new parking lot to serve the Ron Clark Park, the City agrees to commit forty-eight (48) parking spaces (whether in the parking lot or adjacent street area) for the sole use of the Developer’s patrons during the term of this Agreement during the following days and hours: (i) 4:00 p.m. to midnight on Fridays and Saturdays; and, (ii) 6:00 a.m. to midnight on Sundays. B. Upon termination of this Agreement, so long as such termination is not the result of a default as provided in Section 13 hereof, the Developer shall have the option to continue the 5 usage of the forty-eight (48) parking spaces for a period of twenty (20) years, for an annual fee as set forth in Exhibit C. C. The City commits to grant to the Developer an access easement through the City’s parking area to the Subject Property in perpetuity. D. The City hereby agrees to the one-time construction of new sanitary and water service lines from the water and sewer main to the edge of the City’s property, at a maximum contribution from the City of $50,000, to serve the Subject Property and grant a permanent service line easement to the Developer. E. In consideration of the Developer’s contribution to the costs related to the improvements to be made by the City to the Park Facilities as provided in Section 2C. hereof, the City agrees to permit the Developer to use a portion of the Ron Clark Property, outlined in and pursuant to the terms of Exhibit D, up to forty (40) times per year for no more than three (3) hours per usage which must occur at 4:00 p.m. or later, so long as the Developer cleans the site removing any trash and all other debris by the morning following the Developer’s usage. In the event usage of the shelter and/or the surrounding areas exceed three (3) hours, a charge of $65.00 shall be paid for a two (2) hour block for each usage of the shelter. If the Developer uses the site more than forty (40) times annually, the Developer shall pay rent of $65.00 per usage for a five (5) hour block after the 40th use. The City shall provide the Developer with a map (Exhibit D) of the Ron Clark Park depicting the areas specifically designated for the Developer’s use, which use may never limit access to the public to the remaining area of Ron Clark Park. Reservations for usage by the Developer for each calendar year shall be made with the City by September 1st of the prior year, and dates made after the initial reservation shall be subject to availability. 6 F. The City shall grant to the Developer one entrance/monument business sign easement at the corner of East Main St and Route 47 or at the driveway entrance of East Main. Section 4. Business District Project Costs. A. The City hereby agrees to proceed to include the Subject Property in an area to be designated as a BD District pursuant to the BDD Act; to prepare a BD Plan for the revitalization and redevelopment of the BD District; and, to impose BD Taxes in an amount of 1% on all retail sales within the BD District. B. Upon completion of the Project in accordance with the approved site plan and all applicable ordinances, City codes and laws of the State of Illinois, and so long as no event as described in Section 13 hereof shall have occurred and be continuing, the City covenants and agrees to reimburse the Developer an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the BD Taxes distributed to the City by the Illinois Department of Revenue (“IDOR”) for eligible Business District Project Costs for a period commencing the first day of the month following the operation of a restaurant and banquet hall at the Subject Property. When the amount of the remaining 50% of the BD Taxes results in reimbursement to the City in an amount equal to its obligations in Section 3, Paragraph D, 100% of the BD Taxes distributed to the City by the IDOR shall be distributed to the Developer for additional eligible redevelopment project costs, so long as this agreement is in full force and effect. C. Upon receipt by the City of the BD Taxes from IDOR, the City shall deposit the amount received into the 104 North Bridge Street Account (which shall be deemed to be established upon the approval of this Agreement) and reimburse the Developer for eligible Business District Project Costs no less than semi-annually. 7 D. To establish a right of reimbursement for a specific Business District Project Costs under this Agreement, the Developer shall submit to the City Administrator, a written request in the form attached to this Agreement as Exhibit B (a “Request for Reimbursement”) setting forth specific Business District Project Costs for which reimbursement is sought. Each Request for Reimbursement shall be accompanied by such bills, contracts, invoices, lien waivers or other evidence as the City Administrator or his or her designee shall reasonably require to evidence the right of the Developer to the reimbursement. The City Administrator shall have twenty (20) business days after receipt of any Request for Reimbursement to recommend approval for immediate payment or disapproval of such Request and, if disapproved, to provide the Developer in writing and in detail with an explanation as to why he or she is not prepared to recommend such reimbursement. The only reasons for disapproval of any expenditure for which reimbursement is sought shall be that such expenditure is not an eligible Business District Project Cost under the BDD Act; or, that the construction was not completed in accordance with the approved Legal Requirements and the provisions of this Agreement. THE CITY’S OBLIGATIONS TO REIMBURSE THE DEVELOPER UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS A LIMITED OBLIGATION PAYABLE FROM BD TAXES DEPOSITED IN THE 104 NORTH BRIDGE STREET ACCOUNT FROM TIME TO TIME FOR BUSINESS DISTRICT PROJECT COSTS AND SHALL NOT BE SECURED BY THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT OF THE CITY. Section 5. Mutual Understandings. A. The City agrees to maintain all parking areas owned by it throughout the term of this Agreement including the areas used by the Developer but excluding any parking area on the Subject Property. 8 B. The Developer agrees to maintain the sanitary and water service lines serving the Subject Property from the water main to the end of the City property in perpetuity. If the Subject Property is transferred to a new owner by the Developer, then the new owner shall be obligated to maintain the sanitary and water service lines and the Developer shall be released from any further obligation to the City in connection therewith. C. The Developer covenants and agrees that the City’s obligations under this Agreement are conditioned upon the payment by the Developer of all amounts due to all governmental units and agencies having jurisdiction over the Subject Property, including, but not limited to, all taxes, fees, license fees, water and sewer bills and any invoice for services provided to the Subject Property by the it or any other unit of government. D. The Developer may be permitted access to the islands located in the middle of the Fox River upon receipt of permission from the City, it being understood that the sole purpose for such access would be to install landscaping enhancements to the extent mutually agreed. E. The City agrees to consider the developer’s use of air rights over a portion of the Ron Clark property for purposes of construction of a cantilevered deck, contingent upon the City’s legal ability to so grant. F. Upon approval of final plans for the subject property and the Ron Clark Park parking lot, the parties mutually agree to address solutions for stormwater improvements deemed necessary. G. The Developer shall have the right to demand a termination of the designation of the BD District, so long as the City has been fully reimbursed in an amount equal to its obligations in Section 3, Paragraph D. 9 H. The Developer agrees to grant the City an easement along the southern portion of the Subject Property for purposes of a sidewalk and/or trail, provided that such easement is not conveyed to the City unless and until the City builds a sidewalk and/or trail running to each end of the subject property and connecting to existing sidewalks or trails on both eastern and western adjacent properties. Section 6. Term. Unless earlier terminated pursuant to Section 13, this Agreement shall commence on the date of execution and end September 30, 2041. Section 7. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by the Developer without the prior written consent of the City which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Section 8. Force Majeure. Time is of the essence of this Agreement; provided, however, a party shall not be deemed in material breach of this Agreement with respect to any obligations arising from this Agreement on such party’s part to be performed if such party fails to timely perform the same and such failure is due in whole or in part to any strike, lock-out, civil disorder, severe weather conditions, wet soil conditions, failure or interruptions of power, riots, insurrections, acts of terrorism, war, fuel shortages, accidents casualties, floods, earthquakes, fires, acts of God, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, freight embargoes, or similar causes beyond the reasonable control of such party (“Force Majeure”). If one of the foregoing events occurs or either party claims that such an event occurred, the party to whom such claim is made shall investigate and consult with the party making such claim, and the party to whom such claim is made shall grant any extension for the performance of the unsatisfied obligation equal to the period of the delay, which period shall 10 commence to run from the time of the commencement of the Force Majeure; provided that the failure of performance was reasonably caused by such Force Majeure. Section 9. Indemnification. The Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers and employees against all injuries, deaths, losses, damages, claims, suits, liabilities, judgments, costs, and expenses (including any liabilities, judgments, costs and expenses and reasonable attorney’s fees) which may arise directly or indirectly from the failure of the Developer, or any contractor, subcontractor, agent, or employee thereof (so long as such contractor, subcontractor, agent, or employee thereof is hired by the Developer) to timely pay any contractor, subcontractor, laborer, or materialman, from any default or breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer; or from any negligence or reckless or willful misconduct of the Developer or any contractor, subcontractor, agent, or employee thereof (so long as such contractor, subcontractor or agent or employee is hired by the Developer). The Developer shall, at its own cost and expense, appear, defend, and pay all charges of attorneys, costs, and other expenses arising therefrom or incurred in connection therewith. If any judgment shall be rendered against the City, its agents, officers, officials, or employees in any such action, the Developer shall have no obligation whatsoever, with respect to any acts of negligence or reckless or willful misconduct on the part of the City or any of its officers, agents, employees, or contractors. Section 10. Waiver. Any party to this Agreement may elect to waive any remedy it may enjoy hereunder, provided that no such waiver shall be deemed to exist unless the party waiving such right or remedy does so in writing. No such waiver shall obligate such party to waive any right or 11 remedy hereunder, or shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of other rights and remedies provided said party pursuant to this Agreement. Section 11. Severability. If any section, subsection, term, or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any party or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of said section, subsection, term, or provision of this Agreement, or the application of same to parties or circumstances other than those to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby. Section 12. Notices. All notices, demands, requests, consents, approvals, or other instruments required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be executed by the party, or an officer, agent, or attorney of the party, and shall be deemed to have been effective as of the date of actual delivery, if delivered personally, or as of the third (3rd) day from and including the date of posting, if mailed by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, addressed as follows: To the Developer: ___________________________ ___________________________ ___________________________ With a copy to : Jeffrey L. Lewis 2045 Aberdeen Court Suite A Sycamore, Illinois 60178 To the City: Bart Olson, City Administrator United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road 12 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 With a copy to: Kathleen Field Orr Kathleen Field Orr & Associates 53 West Jackson Boulevard Suite 964 Chicago, Illinois 60604 Section 13. Remedies – Liability. A. If, in the City’s judgment, the Developer is in material default of this Agreement, the City shall provide the Developer with a written statement indicating any failure on The Developer’s part to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. The City may not exercise any remedies against the Developer in connection with such failure until sixty (60) days after giving such notice. If such default cannot be cured within such sixty (60) day period, such period shall be extended for such time as is reasonably necessary for the curing of the same, so long as the Developer diligently proceeds with such cure; if such default is cured within such extended period, the default shall not be deemed to constitute a breach of this Agreement. A default not cured as provided above shall constitute a breach of this Agreement. Any failure or delay by the City in asserting any of its rights or remedies as to any default or alleged default or breach shall not operate as a waiver of any such default or breach of any rights or remedies it may have as a result of such default or breach. B. If the Developer materially fails to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement after notice is given by the City and any cure periods described in paragraph (A) above have expired, the City may elect to terminate this Agreement or exercise any right or remedy it may have at law or in equity, including the right to specifically enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 13 C. If prior to completion of the Developer’s obligations pursuant to Section 3 hereof, any voluntary or involuntary petition or similar pleading under any section of any bankruptcy or insolvency act shall be filed by or against the Developer; or any voluntary or involuntary proceeding in any court or tribunal shall be instituted to declare the Developer insolvent or unable to pay the Developer’s debts; or the Developer makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors; or a trustee or receiver is appointed for the Developer or for the major part of the Developer’s property; the City may elect, but is not required to, terminate this Agreement with or without notice, to the extent permitted by law and enforceable under applicable federal bankruptcy laws. D. If, in the Developer’s judgment, the City is in material default of this Agreement, the Developer shall provide the City with a written statement indicating in adequate detail any failure on the City’s part to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. The Developer may not exercise any remedies against the City in connection with such failure until sixty (60) days after giving such notice. If such default cannot be cured within such sixty (60) day period, such period shall be extended for such time as is reasonably necessary for the curing of the same, so long as the City diligently proceeds with such cure; if such default is cured within such extended period, the default shall not be deemed to constitute a breach of this Agreement. A default not cured as provided above shall constitute a breach of this Agreement. Any failure or delay by the Developer in asserting any of its rights or remedies as to any default or any alleged default or breach shall not operate as a waiver of any such default or breach of any rights or remedies it may have as a result of such default or breach. E. In addition to any other rights or remedies, a party may institute legal action against the other party to cure, correct, or remedy any default, or to obtain any other remedy 14 consistent with the purpose of this Agreement, either at law or in equity, including, but not limited to, the equitable remedy of an action for specific performance; provided, however, no recourse for any claim under or upon any obligation contained in this Agreement shall be had against the City, its officers, agents, attorneys, representatives, or employees, in any amount or in excess of any specific sum agreed to be paid by the City pursuant to this Agreement; and no liability, right, or claim at law or in equity shall be attached to or incurred by the City, its officers, agents, attorneys, representatives, or employees in any amount in excess of any specific sums agreed by the City to be paid hereunder, and any such claim is hereby expressly waived and released as a condition of and as consideration for the execution of this Agreement by the City. F. The rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by a party of one or more such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise, at the same time or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or for any other default by the other party. Section 14. Amendment. This Agreement, and any exhibits attached to this Agreement, may be amended only in a writing signed by all parties with the adoption of any ordinance or resolution of the City approving the amendment, as provided by law, and by execution of the amendment by the parties or their successors in interest. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, this Agreement supersedes all prior agreements, negotiations, and discussions relative to the Project. Section 15. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 15 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 16 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the above date at Yorkville, Illinois. City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation By: ____________________________________ President Attest: ________________________________ City Clerk ________________________________________ By: _________________________________________ Its Owner Attest: ______________________________ Secretary 17 Exhibit A Legal Description of the BD District 18 Exhibit B REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT [Date] City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Re: Redevelopment Agreement dated __________________, by and between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois and ______________ (the “Developer”) Dear Sir: You are requested to reimburse the Owner and the Developer described above in the amount of $__________ for the purpose(s) set forth in this Request for Reimbursement. 1. The amount requested to be disbursed pursuant to this Request for Reimbursement will be used to reimburse those Business District Project Costs detailed in Schedule 1 attached to this Request for Reimbursement. 2. The undersigned certifies that: (i) the amounts included were made or incurred in accordance with the construction contracts, and building permits heretofore in effect; (ii) the amounts paid or to be paid, as set forth in this Request for Reimbursement, represents funds due and payable for Business District Project Costs; (iii) the expenditures for which amounts are requisitioned represent proper Business District Project Costs and have not been included in any previous Request for Reimbursement; (iv) the moneys requisitioned are not greater than those necessary to meet obligations due and payable or to reimburse the Developer for its funds actually advanced for the Project; (v) the Developer is not in default under the Agreement and nothing has occurred to the knowledge of the Developer that would prevent the performance of its obligations under the Agreement. 3. Attached hereto are copies of invoices or bills for each item of which the Developer is seeking reimbursement. Date: By: ____________________________________________ APPROVED: United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation Date: ____________________________________________ 19 Exhibit C Use agreement extension annual fee Annual fee for usage of 48 parking spaces between April 1 and November 1 of each year listed: Count Year Annual Fee 1 2039 $5,000 2 2040 $5,063 3 2041 $5,126 4 2042 $5,190 5 2043 $5,255 6 2044 $5,320 7 2045 $5,387 8 2046 $5,454 9 2047 $5,522 10 2048 $5,591 11 2049 $5,661 12 2050 $5,732 13 2051 $5,804 14 2052 $5,876 15 2053 $5,950 16 2054 $6,024 17 2055 $6,099 18 2056 $6,176 19 2057 $6,253 20 2058 $6,331 20 Exhibit D Illustration and narrative of use of Clark Park by the Developer for ceremonies granted [Map of park with shelter and trail] [Map should have a drawn outline of footprint reserved] [Map of areas of the park where group rentals will still be allowed concurrent with wedding ceremonies by Developer] Per Park Rental and Use Policies , the developer shall have exclusive use of the area generally within the footprint drawn on the map during the times set forth previously in this agreement in Section 3, Paragraph E. This area is understood to be a small clearing and shelter and will be used for wedding ceremonies and other gatherings. Use of the area during the ceremony may include chairs, platforms, decorations, and other related items. Both parties understand that the area outside of the footprint drawn on the map above will still be open to the public, even during times when ceremonies are active., Summary Review of a discussion between the City and the 104 N Bridge St developer for a public private partnership on a parking lot to be constructed in and/or adjacent to Clark Park. Background During the discussion of the rezoning and variance application from Mark Southern for the 104 N Bridge St property, it became apparent that the size, location, and use of the property would provide some access and parking challenges. First, the right-in-right-out driveway and the location of the property adjacent to the raised median on Route 47 prevents the property from ever having full access. While the developer would have been ok with right-in-right-out access onto Route 47, the topography of the property would have required a second right-in-right-out access on the north side of the property (one entrance for deliveries, one for the parking lot). IDOT’s initial review of this plan was not favorable, which meant that we needed to look at full access to the property somewhere through Clark Park. Second, the size and use of the property posed some challenges to the amount of parking desired for the property. From a land-use perspective, we think the developer would be able to easily meet, but not exceed, the minimum parking requirements for the use of the property within the property boundaries. However, the nature of a restaurant/banquet facility means peak usage above the minimum requirements within our zoning code – so the developer has targeted additional parking spaces as necessary for successful operation of the restaurant. Very early concept plans for the property show that 40 spaces can comfortably fit on north end of the property. The building would likely sit in the middle of the property, and green space on the south end of the property. The building can not be shifted south on the property much further than the initial drawings because of the topography of the south end of the property, which means the developer has limited opportunity to add parking. Ideally, the developer would like access to an additional 40 parking spaces in the immediate area. While there are eight public parking spaces in the park off of E Main St, and there are a couple dozen spaces around Town Square, we felt that the use of the Clark Park and the problems crossing Route 47, respectively, would pose issues for regular use of the parking spaces by business patrons. All of the above led to a discussion that the City could build a parking lot and access drive across the Clark Park property which would both allow business patrons to access the 104 N Bridge St property and would increase parking for the general public for Clark Park and Town Square uses. Early proposal The 104 N Bridge St property is not in a TIF district, and while the staff expressed some willingness to explore whether the property could be added to the second Downtown TIF district (currently under review by the City Council), the property owner plans on developing the property much Memorandum To: Park Board From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: October 5, 2017 Subject: Clark Park parking lot sooner than the TIF can be created. This meant that the City needs to look at more traditional incentive arrangements, including sales tax sharing or other methods. The discussions on property development and incentives led us to a public private partnership. Since Mark Southern is the owner at Encap and an owner of Fishermen’s Inn, he brings great expertise and a unique set of skills to environmental development, ecological restoration, and restaurant and banquet facility operations. Encap has been the low bidder on many City naturalization projects in the past. We envision utilizing Encap’s expertise and resources to both offset the City’s cost of the public private partnership and to improve the facilities within the park. Exact details of the arrangement are still being discussed between both parties, including commitment amounts and types, but the general concept is as follows: 1) Access drive and signage a. The City allows an access drive and directional/business signage to be constructed across a portion of the Clark Park so that business patrons can access the 104 N Bridge St parking lot from E Main St. 2) City parking lot a. 40 or so parking spaces get added within or adjacent to Clark Park, with a significant contribution coming from the developer for planning and construction of the spaces. b. Some form of use agreement with the developer so that business patrons have access to the 40 additional parking spaces in or adjacent to Clark Park during peak business periods. 3) Park use and improvements a. The City utilizes Encap’s expertise and resources at a discounted rate to improve areas within the park for general public use, including removing invasive species, installing high value plants and trees, and ecologically clearing areas viewpoint vistas within the park. b. The City partners with the property developer to improve the area around the existing shelter for better use as a wedding ceremony site. c. The property developer would receive be able to utilize the park for wedding ceremonies in consideration for all of the above. 4) Water and sewer service a. As a general incentive in the absence of a TIF agreement, the City has offered to replace the existing, residentially-sized water and sewer lines across the Clark Park property, with a larger water and sewer service. This offer would involve the City either contracting or performing in-house the excavation of the existing service lines and reinstallation of large service lines between the sewer and water mains near E Main St to the edge of the 104 N Bridge St property. We would expect this cost to be around $35,000 total, and could likely be funded out of the water and sewer fund. Out of the items listed above, the most important component is the access drive and additional parking. The developer has not closed on the property, but would expect to soon after a vote on the variance and rezoning application. While neither the variance nor the rezoning application require the parking and access issues to be addressed, the developer has let us know that he needs some guidance as to whether the public private partnership above has a reasonable chance of succeeding. In general, staff is supportive of the outline above. There are many hurdles yet to jump regarding: the contribution amounts for all components; cost, use, and layout of the parking spaces in and near the park; improvements to the park. However, we’ve found a willing negotiating partner and successful developer in Mark Southern and we are optimistic all of these issues can be ironed out as long as everyone is ok with the concept. In general, staff has tried to layout two parking options. One that winds its way through the property in an effort to save trees but with a larger overall footprint. The second is a compact rectangle which generally extends off of the north side of the 104 N Bridge property (drawing not available yet) in an effort to reduce cost and overall footprint, but at the cost of losing more trees than the other option. We’ve prepared a first draft of the first parking layout option, which winds its way through the trees on the property. This first draft has not been formally reviewed by Mark Southern, but it was passed out at the EDC meeting last week. In general, the EDC was comfortable with a parking lot on the Clark Park property, but wanted input from the Park Board as to whether the layout should wind through the trees or be a compact rectangle. Additionally, the EDC gave some input about making sure the properties to the east were properly buffered or bermed, and that the homes across the street from the exit to the parking lot were given some consideration for light and traffic impacts. Recommendation Staff requests feedback on the above proposal and some input on the first draft parking layout vs a compact rectangle layout. hEngineering Enterprises, Inc.11CONCEPT PARKING PLAN104 N. BRIDGE STREETSITE IMPROVEMENTSYORKVILLE, ILLINOISUNITED CITY OF YORKVILLELEGEND BACKGROUND & REQUEST: The petitioner, Mark Southern (contract purchaser), on behalf of Michael and Molly Schomer, property owners, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting rezoning approval from R-1, Single-Family Suburban Residence District and R-2 Single Family Traditional Residence District to B-2 Retail Commerce Business District. A variance is also sought by the petitioner to reduce the minimum required rear yard setback in the B-2 zoning district from twenty feet (20’) to zero feet (0’). The real property, comprised of two parcels, is approximately 1.05-acres and is located at 104 North Bridge Street, just east of Illinois Route 47, south of E. Main Street, immediately north of the Fox River and west of Ron Clark Park in Yorkville, Illinois. Currently, a single- family home is situated on the property which straddles two (2) parcels. As proposed, the petitioner will demolish the existing home and construct a two- story building with surface parking which will contain an approximately 12,000 square foot restaurant and banquet hall. The main floor of the building (~8,000 square feet) will house the food service and restaurant operations while the lower level, about 4,000 square feet, will be used as the banquet facility. The building is planned to be constructed immediately adjacent to the eastern property line, thereby necessitating the zero foot setback due the unique constraints of the topography in the area. The site topography also dictates stairs be proposed along the western walkway around the building to access the delivery area and trash enclosure. The parking lot will be constructed to the north of the restaurant structure along the eastern and western property lines. The plan illustrates utilizing the existing right-in/right out access drive off of Illinois Route 47 for deliveries. However, the primary access point for this proposed project will be constructed north of the property off of East Main Street through Ron Clark Park via a public/private partnership between the petitioner and the City whereby additional parking for the recreational area will be provided. This public/private partnership will be memorialized under a separate development Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Jason Engberg, Senior Planner Date: September 25, 2017 Subject: PZC 2017-12 – 104 N. Bridge Street – Rezoning and Variance 2 agreement presented to the EDC and City Council at future meeting. The park will also serve as an intervening land use and densely screened landscape buffer between the proposed commercial use and the nearby existing residential homes. Finally, the minimum off-street parking requirement for the proposed restaurant has been met on site via 38 parking stalls and bicycle racks. While no monument site signage has been illustrated on the plan, it is anticipated such signage will be incorporated into the final site design and signage details will be reviewed at time of building permit and will be required to adhere to the current sign ordinance regulations. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing zoning and land use for properties surrounding the subject property are as indicated below: Zoning Land Use North OS-1, Open Space (Passive) Ron Clark Park (City) East OS-1, Open Space (Passive) Ron Clark Park (City) South Waterway Fox River West Transportation Corridor Illinois Route 47 (Bridge Street) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE: The City’s Comprehensive Plan Update 2016 designated this parcel as “Traditional Neighborhood Residential” and “Parks and Open Space”. In general, the Traditional Neighborhood Residential designation is intended primarily for single-family detached residences, “preserving and maintaining the…scale and design of the existing housing stock.” While the Parks and Open Space land use designation is intended to preserve existing active centers for recreational activity through a well connected system of open spaces, trails and “green” infrastructure. However, the Comprehensive Plan Update 2016 offered a more detailed analysis of areas within the City that abutted major thoroughfares as part of a corridor study, further defining the relationships and development pattern of future land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. In Section 8 – Corridors of the updated plan, the subject property is identified within Zone F (Walnut Street to Fox River), it is envisioned that the existing residential development pattern be preserved and branding elements, such as streetscape and gateway signage, be installed to promote this areas characteristic as one of the “Old Bristol” neighborhoods. 3 Although the proposed commercial land use is not consistent with the future land use designation as Traditional Neighborhood Residential”, the Zone F area identified in the Comprehensive Plan Update 2016 does recognize this location adjacent to a major arterial roadway as having small-scale office, retail and institutional uses scattered throughout. Since it is the intent of the petitioner to enhance the park and open space areas nearby and on their property to take full advantage of the mature landscaping and river front views, it is staff’s recommendation that the petitioner maintain the neighborhood scale, and incorporates high quality development design with a “nod” to the surrounding “Old Bristol” residential character. AMENDMENT CRITERIA: Section 10-4-10-B-3 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance establishes standards for proposed amendment requests. Where the purpose and effect of the proposed amendment are to change the zoning classification of a particular property, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall make findings based upon the evidence presented to it in each specific case with respect to the following matters: 1. The existing uses and zoning of nearby property. 2. The extent to which the property values are diminished by the particular zoning restrictions. 3. The extent to which the destruction of property values of plaintiff promotes the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the public. 4. The relative gain to the public as compared to the hardship imposed upon the individual property owner. 5. The suitability of the subject property for the zoned purposes. 6. The length of time the property has been vacant as zoned considered in the context of land development in the area in the vicinity of the subject property. 7. The community need for the purposed use. 8. The care to which the community has undertaken to plan its land use development. The Petitioner has provided written responses to these amendment standards as part of their application and requests inclusion of those responses into the public record at the October 11, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. STANDARDS FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE: The Planning and Zoning Commission must base its decision to vary, or recommend varying, the Petitioner’s request for minimum required rear yard setback relief of the Zoning Ordinance regulation upon the following standards (Section 10-4-7-C): 1. Because the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, a particular hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations was carried out. 4 2. The conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based are unique to the property for which the variation is sought and are not applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. 3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Title and has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 4. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. 5. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets, or increase the danger to the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. The Petitioner has provided written responses to these variance standards as part of their application and requests inclusion of those responses into the public record at the October 11, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The City Administrator will be providing additional information regarding the public/private partnership for the additional parking on the Ron Clark Park site as part of this development. A public hearing is scheduled on October 11, 2017 before the Planning and Zoning Commission for the requested rezoning and variance. A recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration at the October 24, 2017 regularly scheduled meeting. Staff will be available to answer any question the Economic Development Committee may have at Tuesday night’s meeting. Attachments: 1. Copy of Petitioner’s Applications for Rezoning and Variance w/exhibits. 2. Proposed Conceptual Site Plan prepared by HR Green dared 09/20/17. 3. Copy of Public Notice. Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #2 Tracking Number ADM 2017-70 Building Condition Reports 2017 Public Works Committee – October 17, 2017 N/A N/A N/A Discussion of the Preliminary Reports from the Building Condition Survey that EMG performed on City-owned structures and facilities. Erin Willrett Administration Name Department Summary Review of certain Reports from the Building Condition Survey that EMG performed on City- owned structures and facilities and a preliminary discussion on staff recommendations for long-term use of certain facilities. Background EMG’s reports include an assessment of all City-owned buildings, structures and parking facilities (structural frame and building envelope, curtain wall, roofing, plumbing, heating, air conditioning and ventilation, electrical, vertical transportation, life safety/fire protection, interior elements, code inquiries, ADA, and mold). Attached is a brief presentation outlining how to read the report to pull out information from the Immediate Repair Report, the Replacement Reserve Report (20 years) and the calculation of the Facility Condition Index (FCI) to explain the rating of the Facility. The presentation walks a reader through Report #39 “Riverfront Park Pavilion” and Report #1 “102 E. Van Emmon”. One component of the report is to calculate the immediate repair cost. This was calculated by EMG and represents items that were in disrepair as of the date of the site visit. The description and cost are provided in the Immediate Repairs Report at the beginning of each document. Another important report is the Replacement Reserve Report which spans a 20 year period. This outlines the description, cost and estimates the year that the item will need to be replaced/repaired/maintained. In time, this report will be uploaded to a database for staff to maintain and keep updated when items are programmed and/or completed. Other items to note within the report is the Executive Summary where the general property information is located as well as the site visit date, point of contact and the general systematic condition summary is located. Another major goal of the reports was to calculate the Facility Condition Index (FCI), which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. The FCI ranking is calculated by dividing the cost of the Immediate Repair cost by the cost of the Current Replacement Value. That number is represented by a percentage and that equates to a condition rating from “Good” to “Very Poor”. This FCI was calculated for the current state of the facility and also the 10-year FCI. This rating can be used as a guide for each facility when determining to maintain facilities or to replace facilities. Within the FCI findings page also included is the Current Replacement Value (CRV) and the calculation of the Total Capital Needs. The Total Capital needs is calculated by the cost of the Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: October 17, 2017 Subject: EMG Building Condition Reports 2017 immediate repairs added to the Replacement Reserves. This represents a cost that it will take to maintain the facility over the next 10 years. Other items included in the report are photographs of the facility and certain equipment, a site plan of the facility, an aerial photograph of the facility, ADA checklist, and a pre-visit questionnaire. This is all information relevant to the facility and was used in the creation of the overall report. Recommendation Staff has made several recommendations for key City facilities based on the Building Condition Reports. There are 3 facilities that will require additional feedback from the Council and will be discussed in detail in the future. They are as follows:  Beecher Center, 908 Game Farm Road – Continue to Maintain  ARC Building, 201 W Hydraulic – Continue to Maintain  Public Works Facility, 610 Tower Lane – Do Not Maintain  102 E. Van Emmon – Do Not Maintain  Library, 902 Game Farm Road – Continue to Maintain  City Hall and Police Station, 800 Game Farm Road – Requesting Further Direction  Ice Cream/Ginger & Soul, 131 E. Hydraulic – Requesting Further Direction  609 N. Bridge Street – Do Not Maintain  Historic Jail, 111 W. Madison – Requesting Further Direction  Parks Facility, 185 Wolf Street – Continue to Maintain Ykill M iil Fili Yorkville Municipal Facility Condition Assessment ReviewCondition Assessment ReviewFACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT How to Read the ReportReport #39 p39RiverfrontPark Pavilion Immediate Repairs Report Riverfront Park PavilionEMG outlined items that were in disrepair as of the date f h i i iof the site visitStairs/Pavement Repair - $78 cost estimate (repair of loose and missing stones)loose and missing stones)Outlines Item Number ID for more detail in report Page 3 of the report gives description of the immediate irepairAppendix A outlines the pictures of the areas reviewed Replacement Reserve Report – 20 yearsRiverfront Park PavilionChart shows planned repairs/replacements over a 20 if( fh )year time-frame (Page 3 of the Report)This data will be uploaded to a databaseCreate report and update when items are programmed Create report and update when items are programmed and/or completedThis facility shows concrete/paver replacement as well as i h paint over the next 20 years. Executive Summary Riverfront Park PavilionGeneral Property pyInformationSite Visit Date/Point of ContactBuilding Condition S (Gd)Summary (Good) Facility Condition Index (FCI) Riverfront Park PavilionIndication of Building’s O ll C ditiOverall ConditionMeasured for Current Year and +10 YearsCurrent =Ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to Current Replacement Value10 Year = Ratio of Anticipated Capital Reserve Needs to the 10 Year Replacement ValueRating from Very Poor to GoodGood FCI Rating Cont’d Riverfront Park PavilionMetric for Current Year FCI = Good FCI = Immediate Repair ($78) / Current Replacement Value ($91,620) = 0% =GoodMetric for 10-Year FCI = Good10-Year FCI = Replacement Reserves ($1,478) / Current Replacement Value ($91,620) = 1.6% = GoodTotal Capital Needs through 2027 (IR + RR) = $1,556Current Replacement Value (CRV) = $91,620 Also Included Within the ReportPhotographsgpSite Plan (if Available)Aerial of SiteADA ChecklistOverall Report #39 Riverfront Park Pavilion has a p39FCI of “Good”Minor repairs will be done within the next 20 years FCA Report #1102 E. Van EmmonVan Emmon Activity Center Immediate Repairs Report 102 E. Van EmmonTotal Immediate Repair Cost $1,569,991Page 2 & 3 of the ReportldCosts Include:Parking Lot Repairs (including sub-base) RECENTLY REPAIRED -$163,902Elevator Repair $119,000Electric Work and Lighting Electric Work and Lighting (merged total) $499,198Sprinkler System $111,982Structure Work $157 220Structure Work $157,220 Replacement Reserve Report 102 E. Van EmmonTotal Deficiency Repair Estimate through 2037 = yp g 37$2,672,191Page 4 & 5 of the reportCostly Items:Sump Pump Repairki iParking Lot RepairElevator RepairElectrical Repair/UpgradesElectrical Repair/UpgradesSprinkler System UpgradeStructural Repair FCI 102 E. Van EmmonPDF Page 9 of the report, page number 3number 3Current Year Metric for FCI = Very PoorCurrent Year FCI = Immediate Repair ($1 268 442) / Current Repair ($1,268,442) / Current Replacement Value ($1,100,000) = 115% = Very PoorMetric for 10-Year FCI = PoorY FCI Rl t 10-Year FCI = Replacement Reserves ($540,971) / Current Replacement Value ($1,100,000) = 49.1% = PoorTl Cil Nd h h Total Capital Needs through 2027 (IR + RR) = $1,809,413Current Replacement Value (CRV) = $1,100,000 Staff RecommendationsBeecher Center –908 Game Farm Road9Immediate Repairs = $48,168p4,Replacement Reserves Report (20 year) = $1,818,074Current Year FCI = 2.6% = Good10-Year FCI = 61.8% = Very PoorCurrent Replacement Value (CRV) = $1,726,643Total Capital Needs = $1,114,498Recommendation = Continue to MaintainLargest Expenses = Parking Lot, HVAC, Electrical Staff RecommendationsARC Building –201 W HydraulicgyImmediate Repairs = $51,805p5,5Replacement Reserves Report (20 year) = $482,223Current Year FCI = 14.1% = Poor410-Year FCI = 61.6% = Very PoorCurrent Replacement Value (CRV) = $366,474p()$3,474Total Capital Needs = $277,555Recommendation = Continue to MaintainWithin TIF District Can use TIF funds for improvements Staff RecommendationsPublic Works Facility – 610 Tower LaneyImmediate Repairs = $107,488p7,4Replacement Reserves Report (20 year) = $2,914,254Current Year FCI = 6.0% = Fair10-Year FCI = 78.4% = PoorCurrent Replacement Value (CRV) = $1,616,177Total Capital Needs = $1,364,148Recommendation = Do Not MaintainLarge expenses are needed within next 4 – 5 years Staff Recommendations102 E. Van EmmonImmediate Repairs = $1,569,991Replacement Reserves Report (20 year) = $2,672,191Current Year FCI = 115% = Very Poor10Y FCI 49 1% P10-Year FCI = 49.1% = PoorCurrent Replacement Value (CRV) = $1,100,000Total Capital Needs = $1,809,413Total Capital Needs $1,809,413Recommendation = Do Not MaintainBuilding can be used on an interim basis by Parks and iRecreationRepairs are TIF eligibleConstruction of a new building is NOT TIF eligibleConstruction of a new building is NOT TIF eligible Staff RecommendationsLibrary –902 Game Farm Roady9Immediate Repairs = $1,543p,543Replacement Reserves Report (20 year) = $4,111,614Current Year FCI = 0% = Good10-Year FCI = 27.8% = PoorCurrent Replacement Value (CRV) = $7,329,485p()$7,39,45Total Capital Needs = $2,044,508Recommendation = Continue to Maintain10-Year is high expenseBuilding is in good conditiongg Staff RecommendationsCity Hall and Police Station – 800 Game Farm yImmediate Repairs = $212,418Replacement Reserves Report (20 year) = $1,822,128Current Year FCI = 7.7% = Fair10Y FCI 247% P10-Year FCI = 24.7% = PoorCurrent Replacement Value (CRV) = $3,479,307Total Capital Needs = $1,131,900Total Capital Needs $1,131,900Recommendation = Requesting Further Direction from City Councill i l hi b ildi ill O b Ci ll O Ultimately this building will NOT be a City Hall OR a Police StationSee if other entity is interested in locationSee if other entity is interested in location Staff Recommendations131 E Hydraulic (Ice Cream/Ginger & Soul)3y ( /g )Immediate Repairs = $21,625Replacement Reserves Report (20 year) = $240,694Current Year FCI = 5.4% = Fair10-Year FCI = 20.6% = PoorCurrent Replacement Value (CRV) = $394,326Ttl C itl N d $Total Capital Needs = $103,191Recommendation = Requesting Further Direction from City Councilfrom City CouncilRepairs are TIF eligibleNew construction is NOT TIF eligibleg Staff Recommendations609 N. Bridge Street9gImmediate Repairs = $449,683p 449, 3Replacement Reserves Report (20 year) = $611,835Current Year FCI = 49% = Poor4910-Year FCI = 12.9% = PoorCurrent Replacement Value (CRV) = $451,503p()$45,53Total Capital Needs = $568,126Recommendation = Do Not MaintainNo current or long-term use of facilityFCI is high both current and 10-yeargy Staff RecommendationsHistoric Jail – 111 W MadisonImmediate Repairs = $131,093Replacement Reserves Report (20 year) = $144,877Current Year FCI = 14.4% = Poor10Y FCI 3% Gd10-Year FCI = .3% = GoodCurrent Replacement Value (CRV) = $916,186Total Capital Needs = $135,266Total Capital Needs $135,266Recommendation =Requesting Further Direction from City Councili liiblRepairs are TIF eligibleNo immediate planned usePotential Partnership Opportunity Potential Partnership Opportunity Staff RecommendationsParks Facility –185 Wolf Streety5Immediate Repairs = $109,797p9,797Replacement Reserves Report (20 year) = $638,251Current Year FCI = 5.9% = Fair5910-Year FCI = 2.8% = GoodCurrent Replacement Value (CRV) = $1,832,371p ( ) $ , 3 ,37Total Capital Needs = $162,933Recommendation = Continue to Maintain EMG Corporate Headquarters 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100, Owings Mills, MD 21117 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Prepared for: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT Beecher Community Center 908 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 PREPARED BY: EMG CONTACT: EMG Andrew Hupp 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Senior Engineering Consultant Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 800.733.0660 x6632 800.733.0660 arhupp@emgcorp.com www.EMGcorp.com EMG Project Number: Date of Report: On Site Date: 122700.17R000-005.322 September 13, 2017 May 23, 2017 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT Immediate Repairs Report Beecher Community Center 9/13/2017 Location Name EMG Renamed Item NumberID Cost Description QuantityUnit Unit Cost Subtotal Deficiency Repair Estimate * Beecher Community Center 5.4 612426 Retaining Wall, Brick/Stone (per SF Face), Repair 50 SF $11.39 $569 $569 Beecher Community Center 7.2 612452 Backflow Preventer, 2", Replace 1 EA $2,603.17 $2,603 $2,603 Beecher Community Center 7.2 612469 ADA, Restroom, Lavatory Pipe Wraps, Install 6 EA $75.90 $455 $455 Beecher Community Center 7.6 612440 Fire Alarm System, Office Building, Upgrade 9423 SF $2.36 $22,234 $22,234 Beecher Community Center 7.6 612434 Fire Alarm Control Panel, Addressable, Replace 1 EA $20,297.59 $20,298 $20,298 Immediate Repairs Total $46,159 * Location Factor included in totals. Replacement Reserves Report Beecher Community Center 9/13/2017 Location Name EMG Renamed Item Number ID Cost Description Lifespan (EUL)EAge RUL QuantityUnit Unit Cost Subtotal 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Deficiency Repair Estimate Beecher Community Center 5.2 612307 Parking Lots, Asphalt Pavement, Mill & Overlay 25 23 2 43802 SF $3.28 $143,688 $143,688 $143,688 Beecher Community Center 5.2 612308 Parking Lots, Asphalt Pavement, Seal & Stripe 5 0 5 11308 SF $0.38 $4,291 $4,291 $4,291 $4,291 $12,874 Beecher Community Center 5.2 612309 Pedestrian Pavement, Sidewalk, Concrete, Replace 30 29 1 6052 SF $19.82 $119,962 $119,962 $119,962 Beecher Community Center 5.4 612426 Retaining Wall, Brick/Stone (per SF Face), Repair 0 0 0 50 SF $11.39 $569 $569 $569 Beecher Community Center 5.5 612412 High Pressure Sodium Lighting Fixture, 400 W, Replace 20 10 10 1 EA $1,033.67 $1,034 $1,034 $1,034 Beecher Community Center 5.5 612305 Signage, Property, Monument/Pylon, Replace 20 10 10 1 EA $8,602.00 $8,602 $8,602 $8,602 Beecher Community Center 5.5 612411 Flagpole, Metal, Replace 20 5 15 1 EA $2,530.00 $2,530 $2,530 $2,530 Beecher Community Center 5.5 612410 Pole Light, Exterior, 135 to 1000 W HID (Fixture Only), Replace 20 10 10 4 EA $4,630.42 $18,522 $18,522 $18,522 Beecher Community Center 6.3 612306 Roof, Asphalt Shingle, Replace 20 15 5 11308 SF $3.42 $38,679 $38,679 $38,679 Beecher Community Center 6.4 612310 Exterior Wall, Aluminum Siding, Replace 40 34 6 6000 SF $8.67 $52,049 $52,049 $52,049 Beecher Community Center 6.6 612419 Window, Aluminum, Replace 30 28 2 2 EA $584.21 $1,168 $1,168 $1,168 Beecher Community Center 6.6 612418 Window, Aluminum Double-Glazed Large, Replace 30 15 15 6 EA $870.45 $5,223 $5,223 $5,223 Beecher Community Center 6.6 612420 Window, Aluminum Double-Glazed Small, Replace 30 15 15 29 EA $584.21 $16,942 $16,942 $16,942 Beecher Community Center 6.6 612414 Exterior Door, Fully-Glazed Aluminum-Framed Swinging Motor-Operated, Replace 30 20 10 2 EA $10,194.36 $20,389 $20,389 $20,389 Beecher Community Center 6.6 612413 Exterior Door, Fully-Glazed Aluminum-Framed Swinging, Replace 30 20 10 5 EA $2,106.57 $10,533 $10,533 $10,533 Beecher Community Center 6.7 612425 Pedestrian Pavement, Sidewalk, Clay Brick/Masonry Pavers, Replace 30 20 10 75 SF $34.11 $2,558 $2,558 $2,558 Beecher Community Center 7.1 612487 Air Handler, Exterior, 10,001 to 16,000 CFM, Replace 15 12 3 1 EA $70,713.29 $70,713 $70,713 $70,713 $141,427 Beecher Community Center 7.1 612483 Air Handler, Exterior, 4,001 to 6,000 CFM, Replace 15 12 3 1 EA $27,804.57 $27,805 $27,805 $27,805 $55,609 Beecher Community Center 7.1 612482 Air Handler, Exterior, 8,001 to 10,000 CFM, Replace 15 12 3 1 EA $45,895.13 $45,895 $45,895 $45,895 $91,790 Beecher Community Center 7.1 612490 Exhaust Fan, Centrifugal, 1,500 CFM, Replace 15 12 3 1 EA $2,664.18 $2,664 $2,664 $2,664 $5,328 Beecher Community Center 7.1 612488 Exhaust Fan, Centrifugal, 2,500 CFM, Replace 15 12 3 1 EA $3,072.78 $3,073 $3,073 $3,073 $6,146 Beecher Community Center 7.1 612489 Exhaust Fan, Centrifugal, 2,000 CFM, Replace 15 12 3 1 EA $2,664.18 $2,664 $2,664 $2,664 $5,328 Beecher Community Center 7.2 612475 Toilet, Tankless (Water Closet), Replace 20 10 10 5 EA $842.97 $4,215 $4,215 $4,215 Beecher Community Center 7.2 612476 Urinal, Vitreous China, Replace 20 10 10 2 EA $1,193.44 $2,387 $2,387 $2,387 Beecher Community Center 7.2 612468 Lavatory, Vitreous China, Replace 20 10 10 6 EA $572.66 $3,436 $3,436 $3,436 Beecher Community Center 7.2 612478 Service Sink, Porcelain Enamel, Cast Iron, Replace 20 10 10 1 EA $1,360.33 $1,360 $1,360 $1,360 Beecher Community Center 7.2 612462 Sink, Stainless Steel, Replace 20 10 10 2 EA $1,054.05 $2,108 $2,108 $2,108 Beecher Community Center 7.2 612481 Drinking Fountain, Refrigerated, Replace 10 5 5 1 EA $1,257.51 $1,258 $1,258 $1,258 $2,515 Beecher Community Center 7.2 612452 Backflow Preventer, 2", Replace 15 15 0 1 EA $2,603.17 $2,603 $2,603 $2,603 $5,206 Beecher Community Center 7.2 612477 Water Heater, Gas, Residential, 50 GAL, Replace 10 4 6 1 EA $2,349.48 $2,349 $2,349 $2,349 $4,699 Beecher Community Center 7.2 612469 ADA, Restroom, Lavatory Pipe Wraps, Install 0 0 0 6 EA $75.90 $455 $455 $455 Beecher Community Center 7.4 612448 Distribution Panel, 208 Y, 120 V, 100 Amp, Replace 30 20 10 1 EA $5,079.93 $5,080 $5,080 $5,080 Beecher Community Center 7.4 612461 Distribution Panel, 208 Y, 120 V, 100 Amp, Replace 30 20 10 1 EA $5,079.93 $5,080 $5,080 $5,080 Beecher Community Center 7.4 612441 Main Distribution Panel, 208 Y, 120 V, 800 Amp, Replace 30 20 10 1 EA $13,423.81 $13,424 $13,424 $13,424 Beecher Community Center 7.4 612442 Distribution Panel, 208 Y, 120 V, 225 Amp, Replace 30 20 10 1 EA $7,951.00 $7,951 $7,951 $7,951 Beecher Community Center 7.4 612421 Metal Halide Lighting Fixture, 250 W, Replace 20 10 10 3 EA $748.18 $2,245 $2,245 $2,245 Beecher Community Center 7.4 612449 Lighting System, Interior, Upgrade 25 15 10 9423 SF $9.24 $87,087 $87,087 $87,087 Beecher Community Center 7.6 612450 Backflow Preventer, 6", Replace 15 5 10 1 EA $9,344.53 $9,345 $9,345 $9,345 Beecher Community Center 7.6 612433 Sprinkler Heads (per SF), Replace 20 17 3 9423 SF $1.33 $12,531 $12,531 $12,531 Beecher Community Center 7.6 612480 Fire Extinguisher, Replace 15 0 15 3 EA $356.54 $1,070 $1,070 $1,070 Beecher Community Center 7.6 612457 Fire Suppression System, Wet Chemical, Replace 15 12 3 1 EA $3,488.87 $3,489 $3,489 $3,489 $6,978 Beecher Community Center 7.6 612440 Fire Alarm System, Office Building, Upgrade 20 34 0 9423 SF $2.36 $22,234 $22,234 $22,234 Beecher Community Center 7.6 612434 Fire Alarm Control Panel, Addressable, Replace 15 34 0 1 EA $20,297.59 $20,298 $20,298 $20,298 $40,595 Beecher Community Center 7.6 612430 Emergency/Exit Combo, Replace 10 7 3 2 EA $687.51 $1,375 $1,375 $1,375 $2,750 Beecher Community Center 7.6 612427 Exit Lighting Fixture, Backlit, Replace 10 7 3 6 EA $405.01 $2,430 $2,430 $2,430 $4,860 Location Name EMG Renamed Item Number ID Cost Description Lifespan (EUL)EAge RUL QuantityUnit Unit Cost Subtotal 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Deficiency Repair Estimate Beecher Community Center 8.1 612455 Interior Door, Wood Solid-Core, Replace 20 10 10 20 EA $1,423.11 $28,462 $28,462 $28,462 Beecher Community Center 8.1 612456 Interior Door, Fire 90-Minutes and Over, Replace 20 10 10 3 EA $1,649.06 $4,947 $4,947 $4,947 Beecher Community Center 8.1 612454 Interior Door, Fully-Glazed Aluminum-Framed Swinging, Replace 30 15 15 1 EA $2,106.57 $2,107 $2,107 $2,107 Beecher Community Center 8.1 612470 Toilet Partitions, Metal Overhead-Braced, Replace 20 10 10 5 EA $850.00 $4,250 $4,250 $4,250 Beecher Community Center 8.1 612311 Interior Wall Finish, Concrete/Masonry, Prep & Paint 8 4 4 4947 SF $1.45 $7,178 $7,178 $7,178 $14,356 Beecher Community Center 8.1 612312 Interior Wall Finish, Gypsum Board/Plaster/Metal, Prep & Paint 8 4 4 707 SF $1.42 $1,006 $1,006 $1,006 $2,012 Beecher Community Center 8.1 612320 Interior Wall Finish, Acoustical Tile (ACT) Fabric-Faced, Replace 20 10 10 707 SF $13.33 $9,424 $9,424 $9,424 Beecher Community Center 8.1 612327 Interior Floor Finish, Vinyl Tile (VCT), Replace 15 12 3 2827 SF $4.80 $13,571 $13,571 $13,571 $27,143 Beecher Community Center 8.1 612404 Interior Floor Finish, Quarry Tile, Replace 50 34 16 942 SF $15.19 $14,307 $14,307 $14,307 Beecher Community Center 8.1 612321 Interior Floor Finish, Carpet Standard-Commercial Medium-Traffic, Replace 10 7 3 5654 SF $7.26 $41,027 $41,027 $41,027 $82,054 Beecher Community Center 8.1 612409 Interior Ceiling Finish, Gypsum Board/Plaster, Prep & Paint 10 6 4 471 SF $1.94 $912 $912 $912 $1,824 Beecher Community Center 8.1 612406 Interior Ceiling Finish, Acoustical Tile (ACT), Replace 20 18 2 942 SF $3.11 $2,931 $2,931 $2,931 Beecher Community Center 8.1 612408 Interior Ceiling Finish, Acoustical Tile (ACT), Replace 20 5 15 754 SF $3.11 $2,346 $2,346 $2,346 Beecher Community Center 8.1 612431 Kitchen Cabinet, Base and Wall Section, Wood, Replace 20 15 5 80 LF $467.63 $37,411 $37,411 $37,411 Beecher Community Center 8.1 612432 Kitchen Counter, Plastic Laminate, Postformed, Replace 10 5 5 80 LF $43.90 $3,512 $3,512 $3,512 $7,023 Beecher Community Center 8.2 612459 Commercial Kitchen, Exhaust Hood, Replace 15 12 3 1 EA $7,571.72 $7,572 $7,572 $7,572 $15,143 Beecher Community Center 8.2 612460 Commercial Kitchen, Range/Oven, 6-Burner w/ Griddle, Replace 15 5 10 1 EA $9,288.00 $9,288 $9,288 $9,288 Totals, Unescalated $46,159 $119,962 $147,787 $234,809 $9,096 $85,150 $54,398 $0 $0 $0 $266,017 $0 $8,184 $44,832 $912 $62,178 $16,656 $0 $177,446 $0 $1,273,587 Totals, Escalated (3.0% inflation, compounded annually)$46,159 $123,560 $156,787 $256,582 $10,238 $98,712 $64,954 $0 $0 $0 $357,505 $0 $11,669 $65,838 $1,380 $96,871 $26,728 $0 $302,090 $0 $1,619,074 BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition ................................................................ 1 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations ...................................................................... 3 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Scope .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Personnel Interviewed ................................................................................................................. 6 2.4. Documentation Reviewed ........................................................................................................... 7 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire ........................................................................................................... 7 2.6. Weather Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 7 3. Accessibility and Property Research ................................................................................................. 8 3.1. ADA Accessibility ........................................................................................................................ 8 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone ................................................................ 8 4. Existing Building Assessment ............................................................................................................ 9 4.1. Unit or Space Types .................................................................................................................... 9 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed ...................................................................... 9 5. Site Improvements ............................................................................................................................. 10 5.1. Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 10 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks ................................................................................................ 10 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control .................................................................................... 11 5.4. Topography and Landscaping ................................................................................................... 12 5.5. General Site Improvements ....................................................................................................... 12 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems ............................................................................... 14 6.1. Foundations ............................................................................................................................... 14 6.2. Superstructure ........................................................................................................................... 14 6.3. Roofing ...................................................................................................................................... 14 6.4. Exterior Walls ............................................................................................................................ 15 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs ......................................................................................................... 16 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors ..................................................................................................... 16 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony ...................................................................................................... 16 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems .................................................................................. 18 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) ..................................................... 18 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water ............................................................................. 18 7.3. Building Gas Distribution ........................................................................................................... 19 7.4. Building Electrical ...................................................................................................................... 20 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems .............................................................................. 20 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems ....................................................................................... 20 7.7. Life Support Systems ................................................................................................................ 21 8. Interior Spaces .................................................................................................................................... 22 8.1. Interior Finishes ......................................................................................................................... 22 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment .............................................................................. 23 9. Other Structures ................................................................................................................................. 24 10. Certification ......................................................................................................................................... 25 11. Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 26 BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 1 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition The property information is summarized in the table below. More detailed descriptions may be found in the various sections of the report and in the Appendices. Property Information Address: 908 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Kendall, Illinois 60560 Year Constructed/Renovated: 1982 Current Occupants: Village of Yorkville Percent Utilization: 100% Management Point of Contact: City of Yorkville, Mr. Peter Ratos 630.553.8574 phone pratos@yorkville.il.us email Property Type: Municipal Site Area: 2.55 acres Building Area: 9,423 SF Number of Buildings: 1 Number of Stories: 1 Parking Type and Number of Spaces: 94 spaces in open lots Building Construction: Conventional wood frame structure on concrete slab Roof Construction: Gabled roofs with asphalt shingles Exterior Finishes: Brick veneer and metal siding Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning: Central system air handlers Fire and Life/Safety: Fire sprinklers, hydrants, smoke detectors, alarms, strobes, extinguishers, pull stations, alarm panel, exit signs, and emergency battery powered lights. Dates of Visit: May 22, 2017 to May 23, 2017 On-Site Point of Contact (POC): Erin Willret Assessment and Report Prepared by: Paul Prusa Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager ahupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6623 Systemic Condition Summary Site Fair HVAC Fair Structure Good Plumbing Fair Roof Fair Electrical Fair BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 2 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Systemic Condition Summary Vertical Envelope Fair Elevators -- Interiors Fair Fire Fair The following bullet points highlight the most significant short term and modernization recommendations:  Full replacement of concrete sidewalks  Mill and overlay of asphalt parking lot  Modernization of the fire alarm system  ADA accessibility upgrades Generally, the property appears to have been constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained since it was first occupied and is in fair overall condition. According to property management personnel, the property has had a limited capital improvement expenditure program over the past three years, primarily consisting of painting and sidewalk repairs. Supporting documentation was not provided in support of these claims but some of the work is evident. 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate the FCI, which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. Two FCI ratios are calculated and presented, the Current Year and Ten-Year. The Current Year FCI is the ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to the building’s Current Replacement Value. Similarly, the Ten-Year FCI is the ratio of anticipated Capital Reserve Needs over the next ten years to the Current Replacement Value. Fci Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value Good In new or well-maintained condition, with no visual evidence of wear, soiling or other deficiencies. 0% to 5% Fair Subjected to wear and soiling but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. > than 5% to 10% BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 3 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Fci Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value Poor Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. > than 10% to 60% Very Poor Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal is now necessary. > than 60% The graphs above and tables below represent summary-level findings for the FCA. The deficiencies identified in this assessment can be combined with potential new construction requirements to develop an overall strategy that can serve as the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy. Key findings from the assessment include: Key Finding Metric Current Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (IR)/(CRV) 2.6% Good 10-Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (RR)/(CRV) 61.8% Very Poor Current Replacement Value (CRV) 9,423 SF * 183.24 / SF = $1,726,643 Year 0 (Current Year) - Immediate Repairs (IR) $46,159 Years 1-10 – Replacement Reserves (RR) $1,068,339 Total Capital Needs $1,114,498 The major issues contributing to the Immediate Repair Costs and the Current Year FCI ratio are summarized below:  Full replacement of concrete sidewalks  Mill and overlay of asphalt parking lot  Modernization of the fire alarm system Further detail on the specific costs that make up the Immediate Repair Costs can be found in the cost tables at the beginning of this report. 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations As part of the FCA, a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) was performed to determine the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. Property personnel were interviewed concerning any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Sampling is not a part of this assessment. There are no visual indications of the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, or evidence of moisture in representative readily accessible areas of the property. 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost Cost estimates are attached at the front of this report (following the cover page). These estimates are based on Invoice or Bid Document/s provided either by the Owner/facility and construction costs developed by construction resources such as R.S. Means and Marshall & Swift, EMG’s experience with past costs for similar properties, city cost indexes, and assumptions regarding future economic conditions. Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary, order of magnitude budgets. Actual costs most probably will vary from the consultant’s opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy, quality of materials and installation, manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected, field conditions, whether a physical deficiency is repaired or replaced in whole, phasing of the work (if applicable), quality of contractor, quality of project management exercised, market conditions, and whether competitive pricing is solicited, etc. ASTM E2018-08 recognizes that certain opinions of probable costs cannot be developed within the scope of this guide without further study. Opinions of probable cost for further study should be included in the FCA. BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 4 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1.4.1. Methodology Based upon site observations, research, and judgment, along with referencing Expected Useful Life (EUL) tables from various industry sources, EMG opines as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement. Accurate historical replacement records, if provided, are typically the best source of information. Exposure to the elements, initial quality and installation, extent of use, the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised, etc., are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component. As a result, a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual chronological age. The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age. Projections of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) are based on continued use of the Property similar to the reported past use. Significant changes in occupants and/or usage may affect the service life of some systems or components. Where quantities could not be derived from an actual take-off, lump sum costs or allowances are used. Estimated costs are based on professional judgment and the probable or actual extent of the observed defect, inclusive of the cost to design, procure, construct and manage the corrections. 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs Immediate repairs are opinions of probable costs that require immediate action as a result of: (1) material existing or potential unsafe conditions, (2) material building or fire code violations, or (3) conditions that, if not addressed, have the potential to result in, or contribute to, critical element or system failure within one year or will most probably result in a significant escalation of its remedial cost. 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves Replacement Reserves are for recurring probable expenditures, which are not classified as operation or maintenance expenses. The replacement reserves should be budgeted for in advance on an annual basis. Replacement Reserves are reasonably predictable both in terms of frequency and cost. However, Replacement Reserves may also include components or systems that have an indeterminable life but, nonetheless, have a potential for failure within an estimated time period. Replacement Reserves exclude systems or components that are estimated to expire after the reserve term and are not considered material to the structural and mechanical integrity of the subject property. Furthermore, systems and components that are not deemed to have a material effect on the use of the Property are also excluded. Costs that are caused by acts of God, accidents, or other occurrences that are typically covered by insurance, rather than reserved for, are also excluded. Replacement costs are solicited from ownership/property management, EMG’s discussions with service companies, manufacturers' representatives, and previous experience in preparing such schedules for other similar facilities. Costs for work performed by the ownership’s or property management’s maintenance staff are also considered. EMG’s reserve methodology involves identification and quantification of those systems or components requiring capital reserve funds within the assessment period. The assessment period is defined as the effective age plus the reserve term. Additional information concerning system’s or component’s respective replacement costs (in today's dollars), typical expected useful lives, and remaining useful lives were estimated so that a funding schedule could be prepared. The Replacement Reserves Schedule presupposes that all required remedial work has been performed or that monies for remediation have been budgeted for items defined in the Immediate Repair Cost Estimate. BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 5 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2. Purpose and Scope 2.1. Purpose EMG was retained by the client to render an opinion as to the Property’s current general physical condition on the day of the site visit. Based on the observations, interviews and document review outlined below, this report identifies significant deferred maintenance issues, existing deficiencies, and material code violations of record at municipal offices, which affect the Property’s use. Opinions are rendered as to its structural integrity, building system condition and the Property’s overall condition. The report also notes building systems or components that have realized or exceeded their typical expected useful lives. CONDITIONS: The physical condition of building systems and related components are typically defined as being in one of five conditions: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Failed or a combination thereof. For the purposes of this report, the following definitions are used: Excellent = New or very close to new; component or system typically has been installed within the past year, sound and performing its function. Eventual repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Good = Satisfactory as-is. Component or system is sound and performing its function, typically within the first third of its lifecycle. However, it may show minor signs of normal wear and tear. Repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Fair = Showing signs of wear and use but still satisfactory as-is, typically near the median of its estimated useful life. Component or system is performing adequately at this time but may exhibit some signs of wear, deferred maintenance, or evidence of previous repairs. Repair or replacement will be required due to the component or system’s condition and/or its estimated remaining useful life. Poor = Component or system is significantly aged, flawed, functioning intermittently or unreliably; displays obvious signs of deferred maintenance; shows evidence of previous repair or workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards; has become obsolete; or exhibits an inherent deficiency. The present condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of contiguous elements or systems. Either full component replacement is needed or repairs are required to restore to good condition, prevent premature failure, and/or prolong useful life. Failed = Component or system has ceased functioning or performing as intended. Replacement, repair, or other significant corrective action is recommended or required. Not Applicable = Assigning a condition does not apply or make logical sense, most commonly due to the item in question not being present. FORMAT OF THE BODY OF THE REPORT: Throughout sections 5 through 9 of this report, each report section will typically contain three subsections organized in the following sequence:  A descriptive table (and/or narrative), which identifies the components assessed, their condition, and other key data points.  A simple bulleted list of Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements, which lists components and assets typically in Excellent, Good, or Fair condition at the time of the assessment but that will require replacement or some other attention once aged past their estimated useful life. These listed components are typically included in the associated inventory database with costs identified and budgeted beyond the first several years.  A bulleted cluster of Actions/Comments, which include more detailed narratives describing deficiencies, recommended repairs, and short term replacements. The assets and components associated with these bullets are/were typically problematic and in Poor or Failed condition at the time of the assessment, with corresponding costs included within the first few years. BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 6 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PLAN TYPES: Each line item in the cost database is assigned a Plan Type, which is the primary reason or rationale for the recommended replacement, repair, or other corrective action. This is the “why” part of the equation. A cost or line item may commonly have more than one applicable Plan Type; however, only one Plan Type will be assigned based on the “best” fit, typically the one with the greatest significance. The following Plan Types are listed in general weighted order of importance: Safety = An observed or reported unsafe condition that if left unaddressed could result in an injury; a system or component that presents a potential liability risk. Performance/Integrity = Component or system has failed, is almost failing, performs unreliably, does not perform as intended, and/or poses a risk to overall system stability. Accessibility = Does not meet ADA, UFAS, and/or other handicap accessibility requirements. Environmental = Improvements to air or water quality, including removal of hazardous materials from the building or site. Modernization/Adaptation = Conditions, systems, or spaces that need to be upgraded in appearance or function to meet current standards, facility usage, or client/occupant needs. Lifecycle/Renewal = Any component or system in which future repair or replacement is anticipated beyond the next several years and/or is of minimal substantial early-term consequence. 2.2. Scope The standard scope of the Facility Condition Assessment includes the following:  Visit the Property to evaluate the general condition of the building and site improvements, review available construction documents in order to familiarize ourselves with, and be able to comment on, the in-place construction systems, life safety, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and the general built environment.  Identify those components that are exhibiting deferred maintenance issues and provide cost estimates for Immediate Costs and Replacement Reserves based on observed conditions, maintenance history and industry standard useful life estimates. This will include the review of documented capital improvements completed within the last five-year period and work currently contracted for, if applicable.  Provide a full description of the Property with descriptions of in-place systems and commentary on observed conditions.  Provide a general statement of the subject Property’s compliance to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This will not constitute a full ADA survey, but will help identify exposure to issues and the need for further review.  Perform a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) for the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. EMG will also interview Project personnel regarding the presence of any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Potentially affected areas will be photographed. Sampling will not be considered in routine assessments.  List the current utility service providers.  Review maintenance records and procedures with the in-place maintenance personnel.  Observe a representative sample of the interior spaces/units, including vacant spaces/units, in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas to be observed include the exterior of the property, the roofs, interior common areas, and the significant mechanical, electrical and elevator equipment rooms.  Provide an Executive Summary at the beginning of this report. 2.3. Personnel Interviewed The management and building engineer were interviewed for specific information relating to the physical property, available maintenance procedures, historical performance of key building systems and components, available drawings and other documentation. The following personnel from the facility and government agencies were interviewed in the process of conducting the FCA: Name and Title Organization Phone Number Erin Willret City of Yorkville 630.553.8574 The FCA was performed without the assistance of an onsite Point of Contact (POC). BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 7 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2.4. Documentation Reviewed Prior to the FCA, relevant documentation was requested that could aid in the knowledge of the subject property’s physical improvements, extent and type of use, and/or assist in identifying material discrepancies between reported information and observed conditions. The review of submitted documents does not include comment on the accuracy of such documents or their preparation, methodology, or protocol. The Documentation Request Form is provided in Appendix E. Although Appendix E provides a summary of the documents requested or obtained, the following list provides more specific details about some of the documents that were reviewed or obtained during the site visit.  No documents were available 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire A Pre-Survey Questionnaire was sent to the POC prior to the site visit. The questionnaire is included in Appendix E. 2.6. Weather Conditions May 22, 2017: Clear, with temperatures in the 80s (°F) and light winds. May 23, 2017: Raining, with temperatures in the 70s (°F) and light winds. BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 8 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 3. Accessibility and Property Research 3.1. ADA Accessibility Generally, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by entities to access and use of “areas of public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” on the basis of disability. Regardless of its age, these areas and facilities must be maintained and operated to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). Buildings completed and occupied after January 26, 1992 are required to comply fully with the ADAAG. Existing facilities constructed prior to this date are held to the lesser standard of compliance to the extent allowed by structural feasibility and the financial resources available. As an alternative, a reasonable accommodation pertaining to the deficiency must be made. During the FCA, a limited visual observation for ADA accessibility compliance was conducted. The scope of the visual observation was limited to those areas set forth in EMG’s Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist provided in Appendix D of this report. It is understood by the Client that the limited observations described herein does not comprise a full ADA Compliance Survey, and that such a survey is beyond the scope of EMG’s undertaking. Only a representative sample of areas was observed and, other than as shown on the Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist, actual measurements were not taken to verify compliance. At an office property, the areas considered as a public accommodation besides the site itself and parking, are the exterior accessible route, the interior accessible route up to the tenant lease lines and the interior common areas, including the common area restrooms. The facility does not appear to be accessible with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Elements as defined by the ADAAG that are not accessible as stated within the priorities of Title III, are as follows: Parking  Adequate number of designated parking stalls and signage for vans are not provided. Restrooms  Wrap drain pipes below lavatory with insulation; protect against contact with hot, sharp, or abrasive surfaces.  Add pull station alarm in unisex bathroom. A full ADA Compliance Survey may reveal additional aspects of the property that are not in compliance. Corrections of these conditions should be addressed from a liability standpoint, but are not necessarily code violations. The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines concern civil rights issues as they pertain to the disabled and are not a construction code, although many local jurisdictions have adopted the Guidelines as such. The cost to address the achievable items noted above is included in the cost tables. 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone Not applicable. BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 9 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 4. Existing Building Assessment 4.1. Unit or Space Types All 9,423 square feet of the building are occupied by a single occupant, City of Yorkville. The spaces are a combination of offices, recreation rooms, kitchen, supporting restrooms, mechanical, and other utility spaces. 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed The interior spaces were observed in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas accessed included the site within the property boundaries, exterior of the property and the roof. All areas of the property were available for observation during the site visit. BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 10 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 5. Site Improvements 5.1. Utilities The following table identifies the utility suppliers and the condition and adequacy of the services. Site Utilities Utility Supplier Condition and Adequacy Sanitary sewer City of Yorkville Good Storm sewer City of Yorkville Good Domestic water City of Yorkville Good Electric service Commonwealth Edison Good Natural gas service Nicor Gas Good Actions/Comments:  According to the POC, the utilities provided are adequate for the property. There are no unique, onsite utility systems such as emergency electrical generators, septic systems, water or waste water treatment plants, or propane gas tanks. 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks Item Description Main Ingress and Egress Game Farm Road Access from West Additional Entrances Library Parking Lot Additional Access from South Paving and Flatwork Item Material Last Work Done Condition Entrance Driveway Apron Asphalt Less than 5 years Good Parking Lot Asphalt More than 20 years Poor Drive Aisles Asphalt More than 20 years Poor Service Aisles None -- -- Sidewalks Concrete More than 20 years Poor Curbs Concrete More than 20 years Poor Site Stairs None -- -- Pedestrian Ramps None -- -- BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 11 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Parking Count Open Lot Carport Private Garage Subterranean Garage Freestanding Parking Structure 94 -- -- -- -- Total Number of ADA Compliant Spaces 4 Number of ADA Compliant Spaces for Vans 0 Total Parking Spaces 94 Parking Ratio (Spaces/Apartments) -- Method of Obtaining Parking Count Physical count Exterior Stairs Location Material Handrails Condition None -- -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Asphalt seal coating  Asphalt pavement  Sidewalks  Curbs Actions/Comments:  The asphalt pavement exhibits significant areas of failure and deterioration, such as alligator cracking, transverse cracking and heavy overall surface wear. All of the paving must be overlaid with new asphalt paving in order to maintain the integrity of the overall pavement system. Milling is recommended as part of the overall repair work.  The concrete sidewalks and curbs have significant areas of cracking concrete curbs and sidewalks. These areas occur throughout the property. The damaged areas of concrete curbs and sidewalks require replacement. 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control Drainage System and Erosion Control System Exists At Site Condition Surface Flow ☐ -- Inlets ☒ Good Swales ☐ -- Detention pond ☐ -- Lagoons ☐ -- Ponds ☐ -- Underground Piping ☒ Good Pits ☐ -- Municipal System ☒ Good BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 12 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Drainage System and Erosion Control System Exists At Site Condition Dry Well ☐ -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  There is no evidence of storm water runoff from adjacent properties. The storm water system appears to provide adequate runoff capacity. There is no evidence of major ponding or erosion. 5.4. Topography and Landscaping Item Description Site Topography Generally flat Landscaping Trees Grass Flower Beds Planters Drought Tolerant Plants Decorative Stone None ☒ ☒ ☒ ☐ ☒ ☒ ☐ Landscaping Condition Good Irrigation Automatic Underground Drip Hand Watering None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Irrigation Condition -- Retaining Walls Type Location Condition Stone masonry Around light poles Poor Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Stone retaining walls Actions/Comments:  The retaining walls appear problematic. The stones have been removed and are damaged. Damaged portions of the retaining walls must be replaced. 5.5. General Site Improvements Property Signage Property Signage Monument BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 13 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Property Signage Street Address Displayed? Yes Site and Building Lighting Site Lighting None Pole Mounted Bollard Lights Ground Mounted Parking Lot Pole Type ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ Fair Building Lighting None Wall Mounted Recessed Soffit ☐ ☒ ☐ Fair Site Fencing Type Location Condition None -- -- REFUSE DISPOSAL Refuse Disposal Individual garbage bins Dumpster Locations Mounting Enclosure Contracted? Condition -- None None Yes -- Other Site Amenities Description Location Condition Playground Equipment None -- -- Tennis Courts None -- -- Basketball Court None -- -- Swimming Pool None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Signage  Exterior lighting Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 14 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems 6.1. Foundations Building Foundation Item Description Condition Foundation Concrete spread footings Good Basement and Crawl Space None -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The foundation systems are concealed. There are no significant signs of settlement, deflection, or movement. 6.2. Superstructure Building Superstructure Item Description Condition Framing / Load-Bearing Walls Conventional wood/metal studs Good Ground Floor Concrete slab Good Upper Floor Framing -- -- Upper Floor Decking -- -- Roof Framing Heavy lumber beams Good Roof Decking Plywood or OSB Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The superstructure is exposed in some locations, which allows for limited observation. Walls and floors appear to be plumb, level, and stable. There are no significant signs of deflection or movement. 6.3. Roofing Primary Roof Type / Geometry Multiple Gable Roofs Finish Asphalt shingles Maintenance Outside Contractor Roof Age Approximately 15 Yrs BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 15 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Primary Roof Flashing Sheet metal Warranties No Parapet Copings None Roof Drains Gutters and downspouts Fascia None Insulation Fiberglass batts Soffits Concealed Soffits Skylights No Attics Wood joists with plywood sheathing Ponding No Ventilation Source-1 Ridge Vents Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 Soffit Vents Roof Condition Poor Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Asphalt shingles  Roof flashings (included as part of overall replacement) Actions/Comments:  The roof finishes appear to be more than 15 years old. Information regarding roof warranties or bonds was not available.  There are no active roof leaks observed. There is no evidence of active roof leaks. Roof leaks appear to have occurred in the past. The leaks have since been repaired, and no active roof leaks are evident.  Roof drainage appears to be adequate. Clearing and minor repair of drain system components should be performed regularly as part of the property management’s routine maintenance and operations program.  The attics are not accessible and it could not be determined if there is moisture, water intrusion, or excessive daylight in the attics. 6.4. Exterior Walls Building Exterior Walls Type Location Condition Primary Finish Brick veneer Fair Secondary Finish Metal siding Fair Accented with -- -- Soffits Concealed Fair Building sealants (caulking) are located between dissimilar materials, at joints, and around window and door openings. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Metal siding  Masonry re-pointing Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance, including patching repairs, graffiti removal, and re-caulking, is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 16 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs Not applicable. There are no exterior or interior stairs. 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors Building Windows Window Framing Glazing Location Window Screen Condition Aluminum framed, fixed Double glaze Exterior walls ☐ Fair Aluminum framed, operable Double glaze Exterior walls ☐ Fair Aluminum framed, fixed, sidelight Single glaze Exterior doors ☐ Poor Building Doors Main Entrance Doors Door Type Condition Fully glazed, metal framed Fair Secondary Entrance Doors Fully glazed, metal framed Fair Service Doors -- -- Overhead Doors -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Windows  Exterior fully glazed doors Actions/Comments:  The sidelight windows are antiquated, energy-inefficient units with single-pane glazing. Window replacement is recommended. 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony Building Patio, Terrace and Balcony Type Description Location Condition Ground Floor Patio Brick pavers Right side Fair Upper Balcony Structure -- -- -- Balcony Decks -- -- -- Balcony Deck Toppings -- -- -- Balcony Guardrails -- -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Brick pavers BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 17 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 18 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems See the Mechanical Equipment List in the Appendices for the quantity, manufacturer’s name, model number, capacity and year of manufacturer of the major mechanical equipment, if available. 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Distribution System Air Distribution System Constant volume Quantity and Capacity of Air Handlers 3 air handlers ranging from approximately 5,000 to 11,000 CFM Location of Air Handlers Rooftop, penthouse Large Spaces the Larger Dedicated AHU’s Serve Recreation Room, Kitchen Age of Air Handlers All units appear to be original 1982 equipment Air Handler Condition Fair Controls and Ventilation HVAC Control System Individual non-programmable thermostats/controls HVAC Control System Condition Fair Building Ventilation Roof top exhaust fans Ventilation System Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Air handling units  Rooftop exhaust fans Actions/Comments:  The HVAC systems are maintained by the in-house maintenance staff. Records of the installation, maintenance, upgrades, and replacement of the HVAC equipment at the property have been maintained since the property was first occupied.  Approximately all of the HVAC equipment is original.  The HVAC equipment appears to be functioning adequately overall. The engineering staff was interviewed about the historical and recent performance of the equipment and systems. No chronic problems were reported and an overall sense of satisfaction with the systems was conveyed. However, due to the inevitable failure of parts and components over time, some of the equipment will require replacement. A budgetary cost for this work is included. 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water Building Plumbing System Type Description Condition Water Supply Piping Copper Fair Waste/Sewer Piping Cast iron Fair BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 19 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Building Plumbing System Type Description Condition Vent Piping Cast iron and PVC Fair Water Meter Location Fire Sprinkler Room Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Components Water Heater Fuel Natural gas Quantity and Input Capacity 1 unit at 40,000 BTUH Storage Capacity 50 gallons Boiler or Water Heater Condition Good Supplementary Storage Tanks? No Storage Tank Quantity and Volume -- Quantity of Storage Tanks -- Storage Tank Condition -- Domestic Hot Water Circulation Pumps (3 HP and over) No Adequacy of Hot Water Adequate Adequacy of Water Pressure Adequate Plumbing Fixtures Water Closets Commercial grade Toilet (Water Closet) Flush Rating 1.6 GPF Common Area Faucet Nominal Flow Rate 2.0 GPM Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Water heaters  Toilets  Urinals  Sinks  Lavatories Actions/Comments:  The plumbing systems appear to be well maintained and functioning adequately. The water pressure appears to be sufficient. No significant repair actions or short term replacement costs are required. Routine and periodic maintenance is recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components or systems listed above will be required. 7.3. Building Gas Distribution Gas service is supplied from the gas main on the adjacent public street. The gas meter and regulator location could not be determined. The gas distribution piping within the building is malleable steel (black iron). BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 20 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The pressure and quantity of gas appear to be adequate.  Only limited observation of the gas distribution piping can be made due to hidden conditions. 7.4. Building Electrical Building Electrical Systems Electrical Lines Underground Transformer Pad-mounted Main Service Size 800 Amps Volts 120/208 Volt, three-phase Meter and Panel Location Front of building Branch Wiring Copper Conduit Metallic Step-Down Transformers? No Security / Surveillance System? No Building Intercom System? No Lighting Fixtures T-12 Main Distribution Condition Fair Secondary Panel and Transformer Condition Fair Lighting Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Circuit breaker panels  Interior light fixtures Actions/Comments:  The onsite electrical systems up to the meters are owned and maintained by the respective utility company.  The electrical service and capacity appear to be adequate for the property’s demands.  The panels are mostly original 1982 components. The electrical service is reportedly adequate for the facility’s needs. However, due to the age of the panels and increasing difficulty of obtaining replacement parts over time, lifecycle replacements are recommended per above. 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems Not applicable. There are no elevators or conveying systems. 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems Item Description Type Wet pipe BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 21 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Item Description Type Wet pipe Fire Alarm System Central Alarm Panel ☒ Battery-Operated Smoke Detectors ☐ Alarm Horns ☒ Annunciator Panels ☐ Hard-Wired Smoke Detectors ☒ Strobe Light Alarms ☒ Pull Stations ☒ Emergency Battery-Pack Lighting ☒ Illuminated EXIT Signs ☒ Alarm System Condition Poor Sprinkler System None ☐ Standpipes ☐ Backflow Preventer ☒ Hose Cabinets ☐ Fire Pumps ☐ Siamese Connections ☒ Suppression Condition Fair Central Alarm Panel System Location of Alarm Panel Installation Date of Alarm Panel Fire Alarm Room 1982 Fire Extinguishers Last Service Date Servicing Current? 02/2017 Yes Hydrant Location Rear of building Siamese Location Rear Elevation Special Systems Kitchen Suppression System ☒Computer Room Suppression System ☐ Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Central alarm panel  Alarm devices and system  Sprinkler heads Actions/Comments:  The fire alarm systems appear somewhat antiquated and not up to current standards. A lack of strobes and audio alarms was present in the restrooms. Due to the age of the components and apparent shortcomings, a full modernization project is recommended. A budgetary cost is included.  The central alarm panel appears to be original and of the relay style. Based on its age and because replacement parts and components for this type of equipment may be obsolete, the alarm panel requires replacement. 7.7. Life Support Systems Not applicable. BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 22 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 8. Interior Spaces 8.1. Interior Finishes The facility is used as a senior community center for the City of Yorkville. The most significant interior spaces include recreation spaces, offices, kitchen, and main entrance lobby. Supporting areas include hallways, restrooms, mechanical penthouse, and utility closet. The following table generally describes the locations and typical conditions of the interior finishes within the facility: Typical Floor Finishes Floor Finish Locations General Condition Vinyl tile Recreation rooms Fair Carpet Offices, recreation rooms Fair Quarry tile Lobby, restrooms, kitchen Fair Typical Wall Finishes Wall Finish Locations General Condition Painted CMU Offices, restrooms, utility closets Fair Exposed CMU/masonry Lobby, recreation rooms, kitchen, recreation rooms, offices Fair Painted drywall Offices Fair Fabric panels Recreation room Fair Typical Ceiling Finishes Ceiling Finish Locations General Condition Suspended T-bar (Acoustic) Lobby, kitchen, restrooms Fair Painted drywall Offices, recreation rooms Fair Exposed structure Recreation rooms, offices Fair Interior Doors Item Type Condition Interior Doors Solid core wood Fair Door Framing Metal Fair Fire Doors Yes Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Carpet BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 23 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660  Vinyl tile  Quarry tile  Interior paint  Suspended acoustic ceiling tile  Interior doors Actions/Comments:  It appears that the interior finishes are original.  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment The kitchen area has a variety of commercial kitchen appliances, fixtures, and equipment. The equipment is owned and maintained in- house and by the tenants. The tenants are responsible for any necessary replacement costs of their equipment only. The kitchen includes the following major appliances, fixtures, and equipment: Commercial Kitchen Appliance Comment Condition Refrigerators (tenant owned) Up-right Good Freezers (tenant owned) Up-right Good Ranges Gas Fair Ovens Gas Fair Griddles / Grills Gas Fair Fryers ☐ -- Hood Exhaust ducted to exterior Fair Dishwasher ☐ -- Microwave ☐ -- Ice Machines ☐ -- Steam Tables ☐ -- Work Tables ☒ Good Shelving ☐ -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Cooking Range /Oven/Grill Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 24 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 9. Other Structures Not applicable. There are no major accessory structures. BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 25 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 10. Certification City of Yorkville retained EMG to perform this Facility Condition Assessment in connection with its continued operation of Beecher Community Center, 908 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, the “Property”. It is our understanding that the primary interest of City of Yorkville is to locate and evaluate materials and building system defects that might significantly affect the value of the property and to determine if the present Property has conditions that will have a significant impact on its continued operations. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the brief review of the plans and records made available to our Project Manager during the site visit, interviews of available property management personnel and maintenance contractors familiar with the Property, appropriate inquiry of municipal authorities, our Project Manager’s walk-through observations during the site visit, and our experience with similar properties. No testing, exploratory probing, dismantling or operating of equipment or in depth studies were performed unless specifically required under Section 2 of this report. This assessment did not include engineering calculations to determine the adequacy of the Property’s original design or existing systems. Although walk-through observations were performed, not all areas were observed (See Section 4.2 for areas observed). There may be defects in the Property, which were in areas not observed or readily accessible, may not have been visible, or were not disclosed by management personnel when questioned. The report describes property conditions at the time that the observations and research were conducted. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for the use of City of Yorkville for the purpose stated within Section 2 of this report. The report, or any excerpt thereof, shall not be used by any party other than City of Yorkville or for any other purpose than that specifically stated in our agreement or within Section 2 of this report without the express written consent of EMG. Any reuse or distribution of this report without such consent shall be at City of Yorkville and the recipient’s sole risk, without liability to EMG. Prepared by: Paul Prusa P.E., LEED AP, Project Manager Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager ahupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6623 BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 26 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 11. Appendices Appendix A: Photographic Record Appendix B: Site Plan Appendix C: Supporting Documentation Appendix D: EMG Accessibility Checklist Appendix E: Pre-Survey Questionnaire BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix A: Photographic Record Beecher Community Center EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #1: FRONT ELEVATION #2: RIGHT ELEVATION #3: LEFT ELEVATION #4: REAR ELEVATION #5: SIDEWALK #6: DETERIORATING SIDEWALK AND REPAIRED CRACKS Beecher Community Center EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #7: PARKING LOTS, ASPHALT PAVEMENT #8: SIGNIFICANT CRACKING AND DETERIORATION OF PARKING LOT #9: HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LIGHTING FIXTURE #10: FLAGPOLE #11: POLE LIGHT #12: SIGNAGE Beecher Community Center EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #13: ROOF, ASPHALT SHINGLE #14: EXTERIOR WALL, ALUMINUM SIDING #15: EXTERIOR DOOR, FULLY- GLAZED ALUMINUM-FRAMED SWINGING #16: WINDOW, ALUMINUM DOUBLE- GLAZED OPERABLE #17: WINDOW, ALUMINUM DOUBLE- GLAZED FIXED #18: PEDESTRIAN PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, CLAY BRICK/MASONRY PAVERS Beecher Community Center EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #19: EXHAUST FAN #20: AIR HANDLER #21: WATER HEATER #22: SINK, MULTI-COMPARTMENT #23: LAVATORY #24: SINK, STAINLESS STEEL Beecher Community Center EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #25: DRINKING FOUNTAIN, REFRIGERATED #26: TOILET, TANKLESS (WATER CLOSET) #27: SERVICE SINK #28: LIGHTING #29: MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL #30: METAL HALIDE LIGHTING FIXTURE Beecher Community Center EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #31: EMERGENCY/EXIT LIGHT COMBO #32: FIRE EXTINGUISHER #33: BACKFLOW PREVENTER, FIRE #34: FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL, ADDRESSABLE #35: FIRE ALARM DEVICES #36: SPRINKLER HEAD Beecher Community Center EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #37: FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM, WET CHEMICAL #38: VINYL TILE (VCT) #39: CARPET #40: TOILET PARTITIONS #41: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, ACOUSTICAL TILE (ACT) FABRIC-FACED #42: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, GYPSUM BOARD/PLASTER Beecher Community Center EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #43: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, CONCRETE/MASONRY #44: QUARRY TILE #45: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, ACOUSTICAL TILE (ACT) #46: WATER STAINED ACOUSTICAL TILES #47: INTERIOR WALL FINISH #48: INTERIOR DOOR, FULLY- GLAZED ALUMINUM-FRAMED SWINGING Beecher Community Center EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #49: INTERIOR DOOR, WOOD SOLID- CORE #50: INTERIOR DOOR, FIRE 90- MINUTES AND OVER #51: KITCHEN CABINET #52: COMMERCIAL KITCHEN, RANGE/OVEN, 6-BURNER WITH GRIDDLE #53: COMMERCIAL KITCHEN, EXHAUST HOOD BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix B: Site Plan Site Plan Project Name: Beecher Community Center Project Number: 122700.17R000-005.322 Source: Google Maps On-Site Date: May 23, 2017 BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Page 1 of 4 Date Completed: June 7, 2017 Property Name: Beecher Community Center EMG Project Number: 122700.17R000-005.322 Building History Yes No Unk Comments 1 Has an ADA survey previously been completed for this property? X 2 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? X 3 Does a Transition Plan / Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? X 4 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints that have not been resolved? X 5 Is any litigation pending related to ADA issues? X Parking Yes No NA Comments 1 Are there sufficient accessible parking spaces with respect to the total number of reported spaces? X However no spaces are designated for vans. 2 Are there sufficient van-accessible parking spaces available? X 3 Are accessible spaces marked with the International Symbol of Accessibility? Are there signs reading “Van Accessible” at van spaces? X No designated van spaces. 4 Is there at least one accessible route provided within the boundary of the site from public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones, if provided, and public streets and sidewalks? X 5 Do curbs on the accessible route have depressed, ramped curb cuts at drives, paths, and drop-offs? X 6 If required does signage exist directing you to accessible parking and an accessible building entrance? X Ramps Yes No NA Comments 1* Do all ramps along accessible path of travel appear to meet slope requirements? ( 1:12 or less) X 2 Are ramps that appear longer than 6 ft complete with railings on both sides? X 3 Does the width between railings appear at least 36 inches? X Page 2 of 4 Ramps (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 4 Is there a level landing for approximately every 30 ft horizontal length of ramp, at the top and at the bottom of ramps and switchbacks? X Entrances/Exits Yes No NA Comments 1 Do all required accessible entrance doorways appear at least 32 inches wide and not a revolving door? X 2 If the main entrance is inaccessible, are there alternate accessible entrances? X 3 Is the door hardware easy to operate (lever/push type hardware, no twisting required and not higher than approximately 48 inches above the floor)? X Paths of Travel Yes No NA Comments 1 Are all paths of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair (appear at least 36 inches wide)? X 2 Are wheelchair-accessible facilities (toilet rooms, exits, etc.) identified with signage? X 3 Is there a path of travel that does not require the use of stairs? X Elevators Yes No NA Comments 1 Do the call buttons have visual and audible signals to indicate when a call is registered and answered when car arrives? X 2 Are there visual and audible signals inside cars indicating floor change? X 3 Are there standard raised and Braille marking on both jambs of each hoist way entrance as well as all cab/call buttons? X 4 Do elevator doors have a reopening device that will stop and reopen a car door if an object or a person obstructs the door? X 5 Are elevator controls low enough to be reached from a wheelchair (appears to be between 15 and 48 inches)? X 6 If a two-way emergency communication system is provided within the elevator cab, is it usable without voice communication? X Page 3 of 4 Toilet Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 Are common area public restrooms located on an accessible route? X 2 Are pull handles push/pull or lever type? X 3 Are there audible and visual fire alarm devices in the toilet rooms? X 4 Are toilet room access doors wheelchair- accessible (appear to be at least 32 inches wide)? X 5 Are public restrooms large enough to accommodate a wheelchair turnaround (appear to have 60” turning diameter)? X 6 In unisex toilet rooms, are there safety alarms with pull cords? X 7 Are toilet stall doors wheelchair accessible (appear to be at least 32” wide)? X 8 Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? X 9 Are sinks provided with clearance for a wheelchair to roll under (appear to have 29” clearance)? X 10 Are sink handles operable with one hand without grasping, pinching or twisting? X 11 Are exposed pipes under sink sufficiently insulated against contact? X Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 How many total accessible sleeping rooms does the property management report to have? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible sleeping rooms with respect to the total number of reported guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X Page 4 of 4 Guest Rooms (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 2 How many of the accessible sleeping rooms per property management have roll- in showers? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible rooms with roll-in showers with respect to the total number of reported accessible guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X 3 How many assistive listening kits and/or rooms with communication features are available per property management? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported assistive listening devices with respect to the total number of rooms? See attached hot sheet. X Pools Yes No NA Comments 1 Are public access pools provided? If the answer is no, please disregard this section. X 2 How many accessible access points are provided to each pool/spa? Provide number in comment field. Is at least one fixed lift or sloped entry to the pool provided? X Play Area Yes No NA Comments 1 Has the play area been reviewed for accessibility? All public playgrounds are subject to ADAAG standards. X Exercise Equipment Yes No NA Comments 1 Does there appear to be adequate clear floor space around the machines/equipment (30” by 48” minimum)? X *Based on visual observation only. The slope was not confirmed through measurements. BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix D: Pre-Survey Questionnaire PROPERTY CONDITION ASSESSMENT : PRE-SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:N/A - Not returned to EMG Association with Property: Length of Assocation with Property: Date Completed: Phone Number: Property Name: EMG Project Number: Inspections Date Last Inspected List any Outstanding Repairs Required 1 Elevators 2 HVAC, Mechanical, Electric, Plumbing 3 Life-Safety/Fire 4 Roofs Question Response 5 List any major capital improvement within the last three years. 6 List any major capital expenditures planned for the next year. 7 What is the age of the roof(s)? 8 What building systems (HVAC, roof, interior/exterior finishes, paving, etc.) are the responsibilities of the tenant to maintain and replace? Question Yes No Unk N/A Comments 9 Are there any unresolved building, fire, or zoning code issues? 10 Are there any "down" or unusable units? 11 Are there any problems with erosion, stormwater drainage or areas of paving that do not drain? 12 Is the property served by a private water well? 13 Is the property served by a private septic system or other waste treatment systems? 14 Are there any problems with foundations or structures? 15 Is there any water infiltration in basements or crawl spaces? 16 Are there any wall, or window leaks? 17 Are there any roof leaks? 18 Is the roofing covered by a warranty or bond? 19 Are there any poorly insulated areas? 20 Is Fire Retardant Treated (FRT) plywood used? PROPERTY CONDITION ASSESSMENT : PRE-SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE Question Yes No Unk N/A Comments 21 Is exterior insulation and finish system (EIFS) or a synthetic stucco finish used? 22 Are there any problems with the utilities, such as inadequate capacities? 23 Are there any problems with the landscape irrigation systems? 24 Has a termite/wood boring insect inspection been performed within the last year? 25 Do any of the HVAC systems use R-11, 12, or 22 refrigerants? 26 Has any part of the property ever contained visible suspect mold growth? 27 Is there a mold Operations and Maintenance Plan? 28 Have there been indoor air quality or mold related complaints from tenants? 29 Is polybutylene piping used? 30 Are there any plumbing leaks or water pressure problems? 31 Are there any leaks or pressure problems with natural gas service? 32 Does any part of the electrical system use aluminum wiring? 33 Do Residential units have a less than 60-Amp service? 34 Do Commercial units have less than 200-Amp service? 35 Are there any recalled fire sprinkler heads (Star, GEM, Central, Omega)? 36 Is there any pending litigation concerning the property? 37 Has the management previously completed an ADA review? 38 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? 39 Does a Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? 40 Has the Barrier Removal Plan been approved by an arms-length third party? 41 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints? 42 Does elevator equipment require upgrades to meet ADA standards? 43 Are there any problems with exterior lighting? 44 Are there any other significant issues/hazards with the property? PROPERTY CONDITION ASSESSMENT : PRE-SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE Question Yes No Unk N/A Comments 45 Are there any unresolved construction defects at the property? Comments BEECHER COMMUNITY CENTER EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-005.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 On the day of the site visit, provide EMG's Field Observer access to all of the available documents listed below. Provide copies if possible. INFORMATION REQUIRED 1. All available construction documents (blueprints) for the original construction of the building or for any tenant improvement work or other recent construction work. 2. A site plan, preferably 8 1/2" X 11", which depicts the arrangement of buildings, roads, parking stalls, and other site features. 3. For commercial properties, provide a tenant list which identifies the names of each tenant, vacant tenant units, the floor area of each tenant space, and the gross and net leasable area of the building(s). 4. For apartment properties, provide a summary of the apartment unit types and apartment unit type quantities, including the floor area of each apartment unit as measured in square feet. 5. For hotel or nursing home properties, provide a summary of the room types and room type quantities. 6. Copies of Certificates of Occupancy, building permits, fire or health department inspection reports, elevator inspection certificates, roof or HVAC warranties, or any other similar, relevant documents. 7. The names of the local utility companies which serve the property, including the water, sewer, electric, gas, and phone companies. 8. The company name, phone number, and contact person of all outside vendors who serve the property, such as mechanical contractors, roof contractors, fire sprinkler or fire extinguisher testing contractors, and elevator contractors. 9. A summary of recent (over the last 5 years) capital improvement work which describes the scope of the work and the estimated cost of the improvements. Executed contracts or proposals for improvements. Historical costs for repairs, improvements, and replacements. 10. Records of system and material ages (roof, MEP, paving, finishes, furnishings). 11. Any brochures or marketing information. 12. Appraisal, either current or previously prepared. 13. Current occupancy percentage and typical turnover rate records (for commercial and apartment properties). 14. Previous reports pertaining to the physical condition of property. 15. ADA survey and status of improvements implemented. 16. Current / pending litigation related to property condition. Your timely compliance with this request is greatly appreciated. Prepared for: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, Illinois 60560 PREPARED BY: EMG CONTACT: EMG Andrew Hupp 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Senior Engineering Consultant Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 800.733.0660 x6632 800.733.0660 arhupp@emgcorp.com www.EMGcorp.com EMG Project Number: Date of Report: On Site Date: 122700.17R000-011.322 June 30, 2017 May 23, 2017 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition ................................................................ 1 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations ...................................................................... 3 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Scope .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Personnel Interviewed ................................................................................................................. 6 2.4. Documentation Reviewed ........................................................................................................... 7 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire ........................................................................................................... 7 2.6. Weather Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 7 3. Accessibility and Property Research ................................................................................................. 8 3.1. ADA Accessibility ........................................................................................................................ 8 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone ................................................................ 8 4. Existing Building Assessment ............................................................................................................ 9 4.1. Unit or Space Types .................................................................................................................... 9 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed ...................................................................... 9 5. Site Improvements ............................................................................................................................. 10 5.1. Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 10 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks ................................................................................................ 10 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control .................................................................................... 11 5.4. Topography and Landscaping ................................................................................................... 12 5.5. General Site Improvements ....................................................................................................... 12 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems ............................................................................... 14 6.1. Foundations ............................................................................................................................... 14 6.2. Superstructure ........................................................................................................................... 14 6.3. Roofing ...................................................................................................................................... 14 6.4. Exterior Walls ............................................................................................................................ 15 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs ......................................................................................................... 16 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors ..................................................................................................... 16 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony ...................................................................................................... 16 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems .................................................................................. 17 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) ..................................................... 17 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water ............................................................................. 18 7.3. Building Gas Distribution ........................................................................................................... 19 7.4. Building Electrical ...................................................................................................................... 19 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems .............................................................................. 19 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems ....................................................................................... 20 7.7. Life Support Systems ................................................................................................................ 20 8. Interior Spaces .................................................................................................................................... 21 8.1. Interior Finishes ......................................................................................................................... 21 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment .............................................................................. 22 9. Other Structures ................................................................................................................................. 23 10. Certification ......................................................................................................................................... 24 11. Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 25 PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 1 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition The property information is summarized in the table below. More detailed descriptions may be found in the various sections of the report and in the Appendices. Property Information Address: 201 West Hydraulic Avenue, Yorkville, Kendall, IL 60560 Year Constructed/Renovated: 1985 Current Occupants: City of Yorkville – Parks and Recreation Percent Utilization: 100% Management Point of Contact: City of Yorkville, Mr. Peter Ratos 630.553.8574 phone pratos@yorkville.il.us email Property Type: Office/Day Care Site Area: 0.37 acres Building Area: 4,700 SF Number of Buildings: 1 Number of Stories: 1 Parking Type and Number of Spaces: 17 spaces in open lots Building Construction: Masonry bearing walls and steel-framed roofs Roof Construction: Flat roofs with built-up membrane. Exterior Finishes: Brick Veneer Heating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning: Individual package split-system units Fire and Life/Safety: Hydrants, smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, extinguishers, exit signs, and emergency lights. Dates of Visit: May 23, 2017 On-Site Point of Contact (POC): Scott Sleezer Assessment and Report Prepared by: Paul Prusa Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 2 Systemic Condition Summary Site Fair HVAC Fair Structure Good Plumbing Fair Roof Fair Electrical Fair Vertical Envelope Fair Elevators -- Interiors Good Fire Fair The following bullet points highlight the most significant short term and modernization recommendations:  Installation of a complete fire suppression system  Installation of a complete fire alarm system  Asphalt pavement mill & overlay Generally, the property appears to have been constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained in recent years and is in good overall condition. According to property management personnel, the property has had an active capital improvement expenditure program over the past three years, primarily consisting of new flooring, asphalt pavement seal coating, and interior painting. Supporting documentation was not provided in support of these claims but some of the work is evident. 1.2. F acility Condition Index (FCI) One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate the FCI, which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. Two FCI ratios are calculated and presented, the Current Year and Ten-Year. The Current Year FCI is the ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to the building’s Current Replacement Value. Similarly, the Ten-Year FCI is the ratio of anticipated Capital Reserve Needs over the next ten years to the Current Replacement Value. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 3 Fci Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value Good In new or well-maintained condition, with no visual evidence of wear, soiling or other deficiencies. 0% to 5% Fair Subjected to wear and soiling but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. > than 5% to 10% Poor Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. > than 10% to 60% Very Poor Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal is now necessary. > than 60% The graphs above and tables below represent summary-level findings for the FCA. The deficiencies identified in this assessment can be combined with potential new construction requirements to develop an overall strategy that can serve as the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy. Key findings from the assessment include: Key Finding Metric Current Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (IR)/(CRV) 14.1% Poor 10-Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (RR)/(CRV) 61.6% Very Poor Current Replacement Value (CRV) 4,700 SF * 183.24 / SF = $366,474 Year 0 (Current Year) - Immediate Repairs (IR) $51,805 Years 1-10 – Replacement Reserves (RR) $228,750 Total Capital Needs $277,555 The major issues contributing to the Immediate Repair Costs and the Current Year FCI ratio are summarized below:  Installation of a complete fire suppression system  Installation of a complete fire alarm system Further detail on the specific costs that make up the Immediate Repair Costs can be found in the cost tables at the beginning of this report. 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations As part of the FCA, a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) was performed to determine the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. Property personnel were interviewed concerning any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Sampling is not a part of this assessment. There are no visual indications of the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, or evidence of moisture in representative readily accessible areas of the property. 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost Cost estimates are attached at the front of this report (following the cover page). These estimates are based on Invoice or Bid Document/s provided either by the Owner/facility and construction costs developed by construction resources such as R.S. Means and Marshall & Swift, EMG’s experience with past costs for similar properties, city cost indexes, and assumptions regarding future economic conditions. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 4 Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary, order of magnitude budgets. Actual costs most probably will vary from the consultant’s opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy, quality of materials and installation, manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected, field conditions, whether a physical deficiency is repaired or replaced in whole, phasing of the work (if applicable), quality of contractor, quality of project management exercised, market conditions, and whether competitive pricing is solicited, etc. ASTM E2018-08 recognizes that certain opinions of probable costs cannot be developed within the scope of this guide without further study. Opinions of probable cost for further study should be included in the FCA. 1.4.1. Methodology Based upon site observations, research, and judgment, along with referencing Expected Useful Life (EUL) tables from various industry sources, EMG opines as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement. Accurate historical replacement records, if provided, are typically the best source of information. Exposure to the elements, initial quality and installation, extent of use, the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised, etc., are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component. As a result, a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual chronological age. The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age. Projections of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) are based on continued use of the Property similar to the reported past use. Significant changes in occupants and/or usage may affect the service life of some systems or components. Where quantities could not be derived from an actual take-off, lump sum costs or allowances are used. Estimated costs are based on professional judgment and the probable or actual extent of the observed defect, inclusive of the cost to design, procure, construct and manage the corrections. 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs Immediate repairs are opinions of probable costs that require immediate action as a result of: (1) material existing or potential unsafe conditions, (2) material building or fire code violations, or (3) conditions that, if not addressed, have the potential to result in, or contribute to, critical element or system failure within one year or will most probably result in a significant escalation of its remedial cost. 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves Replacement Reserves are for recurring probable expenditures, which are not classified as operation or maintenance expenses. The replacement reserves should be budgeted for in advance on an annual basis. Replacement Reserves are reasonably predictable both in terms of frequency and cost. However, Replacement Reserves may also include components or systems that have an indeterminable life but, nonetheless, have a potential for failure within an estimated time period. Replacement Reserves exclude systems or components that are estimated to expire after the reserve term and are not considered material to the structural and mechanical integrity of the subject property. Furthermore, systems and components that are not deemed to have a material effect on the use of the Property are also excluded. Costs that are caused by acts of God, accidents, or other occurrences that are typically covered by insurance, rather than reserved for, are also excluded. Replacement costs are solicited from ownership/property management, EMG’s discussions with service companies, manufacturers' representatives, and previous experience in preparing such schedules for other similar facilities. Costs for work performed by the ownership’s or property management’s maintenance staff are also considered. EMG’s reserve methodology involves identification and quantification of those systems or components requiring capital reserve funds within the assessment period. The assessment period is defined as the effective age plus the reserve term. Additional information concerning system’s or component’s respective replacement costs (in today's dollars), typical expected useful lives, and remaining useful lives were estimated so that a funding schedule could be prepared. The Replacement Reserves Schedule presupposes that all required remedial work has been performed or that monies for remediation have been budgeted for items defined in the Immediate Repair Cost Estimate. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 5 2. Purpose and Scope 2.1. Purpose EMG was retained by the client to render an opinion as to the Property’s current general physical condition on the day of the site visit. Based on the observations, interviews and document review outlined below, this report identifies significant deferred maintenance issues, existing deficiencies, and material code violations of record at municipal offices, which affect the Property’s use. Opinions are rendered as to its structural integrity, building system condition and the Property’s overall condition. The report also notes building systems or components that have realized or exceeded their typical expected useful lives. CONDITIONS: The physical condition of building systems and related components are typically defined as being in one of five conditions: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Failed or a combination thereof. For the purposes of this report, the following definitions are used: Excellent = New or very close to new; component or system typically has been installed within the past year, sound and performing its function. Eventual repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Good = Satisfactory as-is. Component or system is sound and performing its function, typically within the first third of its lifecycle. However, it may show minor signs of normal wear and tear. Repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Fair = Showing signs of wear and use but still satisfactory as-is, typically near the median of its estimated useful life. Component or system is performing adequately at this time but may exhibit some signs of wear, deferred maintenance, or evidence of previous repairs. Repair or replacement will be required due to the component or system’s condition and/or its estimated remaining useful life. Poor = Component or system is significantly aged, flawed, functioning intermittently or unreliably; displays obvious signs of deferred maintenance; shows evidence of previous repair or workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards; has become obsolete; or exhibits an inherent deficiency. The present condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of contiguous elements or systems. Either full component replacement is needed or repairs are required to restore to good condition, prevent premature failure, and/or prolong useful life. Failed = Component or system has ceased functioning or performing as intended. Replacement, repair, or other significant corrective action is recommended or required. Not Applicable = Assigning a condition does not apply or make logical sense, most commonly due to the item in question not being present. FORMAT OF THE BODY OF THE REPORT: Throughout sections 5 through 9 of this report, each report section will typically contain three subsections organized in the following sequence:  A descriptive table (and/or narrative), which identifies the components assessed, their condition, and other key data points.  A simple bulleted list of Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements, which lists components and assets typically in Excellent, Good, or Fair condition at the time of the assessment but that will require replacement or some other attention once aged past their estimated useful life. These listed components are typically included in the associated inventory database with costs identified and budgeted beyond the first several years.  A bulleted cluster of Actions/Comments, which include more detailed narratives describing deficiencies, recommended repairs, and short term replacements. The assets and components associated with these bullets are/were typically problematic and in Poor or Failed condition at the time of the assessment, with corresponding costs included within the first few years. PLAN TYPES: Each line item in the cost database is assigned a Plan Type, which is the primary reason or rationale for the recommended replacement, repair, or other corrective action. This is the “why” part of the equation. A cost or line item may commonly have more than one applicable Plan Type; however, only one Plan Type will be assigned based on the “best” fit, typically the one with the greatest significance. The following Plan Types are listed in general weighted order of importance: PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 6 Safety = An observed or reported unsafe condition that if left unaddressed could result in an injury; a system or component that presents a potential liability risk. Performance/Integrity = Component or system has failed, is almost failing, performs unreliably, does not perform as intended, and/or poses a risk to overall system stability. Accessibility = Does not meet ADA, UFAS, and/or other handicap accessibility requirements. Environmental = Improvements to air or water quality, including removal of hazardous materials from the building or site. Modernization/Adaptation = Conditions, systems, or spaces that need to be upgraded in appearance or function to meet current standards, facility usage, or client/occupant needs. Lifecycle/Renewal = Any component or system in which future repair or replacement is anticipated beyond the next several years and/or is of minimal substantial early-term consequence. 2.2. Scope The standard scope of the Facility Condition Assessment includes the following:  Visit the Property to evaluate the general condition of the building and site improvements, review available construction documents in order to familiarize ourselves with, and be able to comment on, the in-place construction systems, life safety, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and the general built environment.  Identify those components that are exhibiting deferred maintenance issues and provide cost estimates for Immediate Costs and Replacement Reserves based on observed conditions, maintenance history and industry standard useful life estimates. This will include the review of documented capital improvements completed within the last five-year period and work currently contracted for, if applicable.  Provide a full description of the Property with descriptions of in-place systems and commentary on observed conditions.  Provide a general statement of the subject Property’s compliance to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This will not constitute a full ADA survey, but will help identify exposure to issues and the need for further review.  Perform a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) for the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. EMG will also interview Project personnel regarding the presence of any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Potentially affected areas will be photographed. Sampling will not be considered in routine assessments.  List the current utility service providers.  Review maintenance records and procedures with the in-place maintenance personnel.  Observe a representative sample of the interior spaces/units, including vacant spaces/units, in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas to be observed include the exterior of the property, the roofs, interior common areas, and the significant mechanical, electrical and elevator equipment rooms.  Provide an Executive Summary at the beginning of this report.  Prepare a mechanical equipment inventory list. 2.3. Personnel Interviewed The building engineer was interviewed for specific information relating to the physical property, available maintenance procedures, historical performance of key building systems and components, available drawings and other documentation. The following personnel from the facility and government agencies were interviewed in the process of conducting the FCA: Name and Title Organization Phone Number Scott Sleezer Parks and Recreation 630.878.7291 The FCA was performed without the assistance of an onsite Point of Contact (POC). PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 7 2.4. Documentation Reviewed Prior to the FCA, relevant documentation was requested that could aid in the knowledge of the subject property’s physical improvements, extent and type of use, and/or assist in identifying material discrepancies between reported information and observed conditions. The review of submitted documents does not include comment on the accuracy of such documents or their preparation, methodology, or protocol. The Documentation Request Form is provided in Appendix E. Although Appendix E provides a summary of the documents requested or obtained, the following list provides more specific details about some of the documents that were reviewed or obtained during the site visit.  No documents provided. 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire A Pre-Survey Questionnaire was sent to the POC prior to the site visit. The questionnaire is included in Appendix E. 2.6. Weather Conditions May 23, 2017: Raining, with temperatures in the 70s (°F) and winds. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 8 3. Accessibility and Property Research 3.1. ADA Accessibility Generally, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by entities to access and use of “areas of public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” on the basis of disability. Regardless of its age, these areas and facilities must be maintained and operated to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). Buildings completed and occupied after January 26, 1992 are required to comply fully with the ADAAG. Existing facilities constructed prior to this date are held to the lesser standard of compliance to the extent allowed by structural feasibility and the financial resources available. As an alternative, a reasonable accommodation pertaining to the deficiency must be made. During the FCA, a limited visual observation for ADA accessibility compliance was conducted. The scope of the visual observation was limited to those areas set forth in EMG’s Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist provided in Appendix D of this report. It is understood by the Client that the limited observations described herein does not comprise a full ADA Compliance Survey, and that such a survey is beyond the scope of EMG’s undertaking. Only a representative sample of areas was observed and, other than as shown on the Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist, actual measurements were not taken to verify compliance. At a office property, the areas considered as a public accommodation besides the site itself and parking, are the exterior accessible route, the interior accessible route up to the tenant lease lines and the interior common areas, including the common area restrooms. The facility does not appear to be accessible with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Elements as defined by the ADAAG that are not accessible as stated within the priorities of Title III, are as follows: Parking  Adequate number of designated parking stalls and signage for cars are not provided.  Adequate number of designated parking stalls and signage for vans are not provided. Paths of Travel  Add visual alarm to existing audible fire alarm. A full ADA Compliance Survey may reveal additional aspects of the property that are not in compliance. Corrections of these conditions should be addressed from a liability standpoint, but are not necessarily code violations. The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines concern civil rights issues as they pertain to the disabled and are not a construction code, although many local jurisdictions have adopted the Guidelines as such. The cost to address the achievable items noted above is included in the cost tables. 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone Not applicable. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 9 4. Existing Building Assessment 4.1. Unit or Space Types All 4,700 square feet of the building are occupied by a single occupant, City of Yorkville – Parks and Recreation. The spaces a combination of offices, classrooms, supporting restrooms, mechanical, and other utility spaces. 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed The interior spaces were observed in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas accessed included the site within the property boundaries, exterior of the property and the roof. Areas of note that were either inaccessible or not observed for other reasons are listed in the table below: Key Spaces Not Observed Room Number Area Access Issues -- Roof Requires a ladder but due to rain it was unsafe to climb metal ladder. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 10 5. Site Improvements 5.1. Utilities The following table identifies the utility suppliers and the condition and adequacy of the services. Site Utilities Utility Supplier Condition and Adequacy Sanitary sewer City of Yorkville Good Storm sewer City of Yorkville Good Domestic water City of Yorkville Good Electric service Commonwealth Edison Good Natural gas service Nicor Gas Good Actions/Comments:  According to the occupants, the utilities provided are adequate for the property. There are no unique, onsite utility systems such as emergency electrical generators, septic systems, water or waste water treatment plants, or propane gas tanks. 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks Item Description Main Ingress and Egress Hydraulic Avenue Access from South Additional Entrances -- Additional Access from -- Paving and Flatwork Item Material Last Work Done Condition Entrance Driveway Apron Asphalt >20 Fair Parking Lot Asphalt >20 Poor Drive Aisles Asphalt >20 Poor Service Aisles None -- -- Sidewalks Concrete Approx. 20 Fair Curbs None -- -- Site Stairs None -- -- Pedestrian Ramps Cast-in-place concrete Approx. 20 Fair PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 11 Parking Count Open Lot Carport Private Garage Subterranean Garage Freestanding Parking Structure 17 -- -- -- -- Total Number of ADA Compliant Spaces 0 Number of ADA Compliant Spaces for Vans 0 Total Parking Spaces 17 Parking Ratio (Spaces/Apartments) -- Method of Obtaining Parking Count Physical count Exterior Stairs Location Material Handrails Condition None -- -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Asphalt seal coating  Asphalt pavement  Sidewalks  Pedestrian ramps Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control Drainage System and Erosion Control System Exists At Site Condition Surface Flow ☒ Fair Inlets ☐ -- Swales ☐ -- Detention pond ☐ -- Lagoons ☐ -- Ponds ☐ -- Underground Piping ☐ -- Pits ☐ -- Municipal System ☐ -- Dry Well ☐ -- PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 12 Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  There is no evidence of storm water runoff from adjacent properties. The storm water system appears to provide adequate runoff capacity. There is no evidence of major ponding or erosion. 5.4. Topography and Landscaping Item Description Site Topography Slopes gently down towards the adjacent river. Landscaping Trees Grass Flower Beds Planters Drought Tolerant Plants Decorative Stone None ☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ Landscaping Condition Good Irrigation Automatic Underground Drip Hand Watering None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Irrigation Condition -- Retaining Walls Type Location Condition None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The topography and adjacent uses do not appear to present conditions detrimental to the property. There are no significant areas of erosion. 5.5. General Site Improvements Property Signage Property Signage Building mounted Street Address Displayed? Yes PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 13 Site and Building Lighting Site Lighting None Pole Mounted Bollard Lights Ground Mounted Parking Lot Pole Type ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ -- Building Lighting None Wall Mounted Recessed Soffit ☐ ☒ ☒ Fair Site Fencing Type Location Condition Stained wood board and posts Rear lot Fair Chain link with metal posts Rear lot Fair REFUSE DISPOSAL Refuse Disposal Common area dumpsters Dumpster Locations Mounting Enclosure Contracted? Condition Left side of building Asphalt paving Wood board fence Yes Fair Other Site Amenities Description Location Condition Playground Equipment Plastic and metal Rear lot Good Tennis Courts None -- -- Basketball Court None -- -- Swimming Pool None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Exterior lighting  Site fencing  Playground equipment  Playground surfaces Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 14 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems 6.1. Foundations Building Foundation Item Description Condition Foundation Masonry foundation walls Good Basement and Crawl Space None -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The foundation systems are concealed. There are no significant signs of settlement, deflection, or movement. 6.2. Superstructure Building Superstructure Item Description Condition Framing / Load-Bearing Walls Masonry walls Good Ground Floor Concrete slab Good Upper Floor Framing -- -- Upper Floor Decking -- -- Roof Framing Steel beams or girders Good Roof Decking Metal decking Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The superstructure is exposed in some locations, which allows for limited observation. Walls and floors appear to be plumb, level, and stable. There are no significant signs of deflection or movement. 6.3. Roofing Primary Roof Type / Geometry Flat Finish Built-up membrane PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 15 Primary Roof Maintenance Outside Contractor Roof Age Approximately 20 Yrs Flashing Built-up base and Edge flashing Warranties No Parapet Copings Pre-cast Concrete Roof Drains Internal drains Fascia None Insulation Rigid Board Soffits Exposed Soffits Skylights No Attics None Ponding Unknown Ventilation Source-1 None Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 -- Roof Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Built-up roof membrane  Roof flashings (included as part of overall membrane replacement)  Parapet wall copings (included as part of overall membrane replacement) Actions/Comments:  The roof finishes appear to be more than 20 years old. Information regarding roof warranties or bonds was not available.  According to the POC, there are no active roof leaks. Roof leaks have occurred in the past year. The leaks have since been repaired, and no active roof leaks are evident  There is no evidence of roof deck or insulation deterioration. The roof substrate and insulation should be inspected during any future roof repair or replacement work.  Roof drainage appears to be adequate. Clearing and minor repair of drain system components should be performed regularly as part of the property management’s routine maintenance and operations program. 6.4. Exterior Walls Building Exterior Walls Type Location Condition Primary Finish Brick veneer Good Secondary Finish Metal siding Fair Accented with Pre-cast concrete Good Soffits Exposed Fair Building sealants (caulking) are located between dissimilar materials, at joints, and around window and door openings. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Metal siding PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 16 Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance, including patching repairs, graffiti removal, and re-caulking, is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs Not applicable. There are no exterior or interior stairs. 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors Building Windows Window Framing Glazing Location Window Screen Condition Aluminum framed storefront Double glaze Front elevation ☐ Fair Aluminum framed, operable Single glaze Exterior walls ☐ Poor Building Doors Main Entrance Doors Door Type Condition Fully glazed, metal framed Fair Secondary Entrance Doors Metal, insulated Fair Service Doors Metal, insulated Fair Overhead Doors None -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Windows  Storefront glazing  Exterior doors Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony Not applicable. There are no patios, terraces, or balconies. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 17 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems See the Mechanical Equipment List in the Appendices for the quantity, manufacturer’s name, model number, capacity and year of manufacturer of the major mechanical equipment, if available. 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Individual Units Primary Components Split system furnaces and condensing units Cooling (if separate from above) performed via components above Quantity and Capacity Ranges 2 units at 5 tons each Total Heating or Cooling Capacity 10 tons Heating Fuel Natural gas Location of Equipment Mechanical rooms Space Served by System Entire building Age Ranges Vary from 2000 to 2014 Primary Component Condition Good to Fair Controls and Ventilation HVAC Control System Individual programmable thermostats/controls HVAC Control System Condition Good Building Ventilation Roof top exhaust fans Ventilation System Condition Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Split system furnaces and condensing units  Rooftop exhaust fans Actions/Comments:  The HVAC systems are maintained by the in-house maintenance staff.  The HVAC equipment varies in age. HVAC equipment is replaced on an "as needed" basis.  The HVAC equipment appears to be functioning adequately overall. However, due to the inevitable failure of parts and components over time, the equipment will require replacement. A budgetary cost for this work is included. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 18 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water Building Plumbing System Type Description Condition Water Supply Piping Copper Fair Waste/Sewer Piping Cast iron Fair Vent Piping PVC Fair Water Meter Location Mechanical room Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Components Water Heater Fuel Natural gas Quantity and Input Capacity 1 unit at 32,000 BTUH Storage Capacity 40 gallons Boiler or Water Heater Condition Fair Supplementary Storage Tanks? No Storage Tank Quantity & Volume -- Quantity of Storage Tanks -- Storage Tank Condition -- Domestic Hot Water Circulation Pumps (3 HP and over) No Adequacy of Hot Water Adequate Adequacy of Water Pressure Adequate Plumbing Fixtures Water Closets Commercial Toilet (Water Closet) Flush Rating 1.6 GPF Common Area Faucet Nominal Flow Rate 2.0 GPM Condition Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Water heater  Toilets  Urinals  Sink  Lavatory Actions/Comments:  The plumbing systems appear to be well maintained and functioning adequately. The water pressure appears to be sufficient. No significant repair actions or short term replacement costs are required. Routine and periodic maintenance is recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components or systems listed above will be required. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 19 7.3. Building Gas Distribution Gas service is supplied from the gas main on the adjacent public street. The gas meter and regulator are located along the exterior wall of the building. The gas distribution piping within the building is malleable steel (black iron). Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The pressure and quantity of gas appear to be adequate.  The gas meter and regulator appear to be functioning adequately and will require routine maintenance.  Only limited observation of the gas distribution piping can be made due to hidden conditions. 7.4. Building Electrical Building Electrical Systems Electrical Lines Overhead Transformer Pole-mounted Main Service Size 200 Amps Volts 120/208 Volt, three-phase Meter & Panel Location Rear elevation Branch Wiring Copper Conduit Metallic Step-Down Transformers? No Security / Surveillance System? No Building Intercom System? No Lighting Fixtures T-8 Main Distribution Condition Fair Secondary Panel and Transformer Condition -- Lighting Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Circuit breaker panels  Interior light fixtures Actions/Comments:  The onsite electrical systems up to the meters are owned and maintained by the respective utility company.  The electrical service and capacity appear to be adequate for the property’s demands.  The panels are original 1985 components. The electrical service is reportedly adequate for the facility’s needs. However, due to the age of the panels and increasing difficulty of obtaining replacement parts over time, lifecycle replacements are recommended per above. 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems Not applicable. There are no elevators or conveying systems. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 20 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems Item Description Type None Fire Alarm System Central Alarm Panel ☐ Battery-Operated Smoke Detectors ☒ Alarm Horns ☐ Annunciator Panels ☐ Hard-Wired Smoke Detectors ☐ Strobe Light Alarms ☐ Pull Stations ☐ Emergency Battery-Pack Lighting ☒ Illuminated EXIT Signs ☒ Alarm System Condition Fair Sprinkler System None ☒ Standpipes ☐ Backflow Preventer ☐ Hose Cabinets ☐ Fire Pumps ☐ Siamese Connections ☐ Suppression Condition -- Central Alarm Panel System Location of Alarm Panel Installation Date of Alarm Panel -- -- Fire Extinguishers Last Service Date Servicing Current? May 2017 Yes Hydrant Location Hydraulic Avenue Siamese Location -- Special Systems Kitchen Suppression System ☐ Computer Room Suppression System ☐ Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The building is not protected by fire suppression. Due to its construction date, the facility is most likely “grandfathered” by code and the installation of fire sprinklers not required until major renovations are performed. Regardless of when or if installation of facility- wide fire suppression is required by the governing municipality, EMG recommends a retrofit be performed. A budgetary cost is included.  The fire alarm systems appear somewhat antiquated and not up to current standards. There is a lack of strobes, audio alarms, insufficient pull stations, and system not fully addressable. Due to the age of the components and apparent shortcomings, a full modernization project is recommended. A budgetary cost is included. 7.7. Life Support Systems Not applicable. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 21 8. I nterior Spaces 8.1. I nterior Finishes The facility is used as a pre-school and an office building for the Department of Parks and Recreation. The most significant interior spaces include classrooms and offices. Supporting areas include restrooms, storage rooms, and mechanical rooms. The following table generally describes the locations and typical conditions of the interior finishes within the facility: Typical Floor Finishes Floor Finish Locations General Condition Carpet Offices and classrooms Fair Vinyl tile Mechanical room Fair Ceramic tile Lobby and restrooms Good Typical Wall Finishes Wall Finish Locations General Condition Painted drywall Throughout the building Fair Painted CMU Throughout the building Fair Typical Ceiling Finishes Ceiling Finish Locations General Condition Suspended T-bar (Acoustic) Throughout the building Fair Painted drywall Restrooms Fair Exposed structure Storage room Poor Interior Doors Item Type Condition Interior Doors Hollow core wood & steel Fair Door Framing Metal Fair Fire Doors Yes Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Carpet  Vinyl tile  Ceramic tile  Interior paint PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 22  Suspended acoustic ceiling tile  Interior doors  Kitchenette appliances Actions/Comments:  The interior areas were last renovated in past 5 years.  The ceiling tiles have isolated areas of water-damaged ceilings. The damaged ceiling tiles need to be replaced. The cost to replace the damaged finishes is relatively insignificant and the work can be performed as part of the property management’s routine maintenance program.  Paint on the exposed structure is worn and chipping in the storage room. 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment Not applicable. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 23 9. Other Structures Not applicable. There are no major accessory structures. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 24 10. Certification City of Yorkville retained EMG to perform this Facility Condition Assessment in connection with its continued operation of Park and Recreation Office, 201 West Hydraulic Avenue, Yorkville, IL, the “Property”. It is our understanding that the primary interest of City of Yorkville is to locate and evaluate materials and building system defects that might significantly affect the value of the property and to determine if the present Property has conditions that will have a significant impact on its continued operations. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the brief review of the plans and records made available to our Project Manager during the site visit, interviews of available property management personnel and maintenance contractors familiar with the Property, appropriate inquiry of municipal authorities, our Project Manager’s walk-through observations during the site visit, and our experience with similar properties. No testing, exploratory probing, dismantling or operating of equipment or in depth studies were performed unless specifically required under Section 2 of this report. This assessment did not include engineering calculations to determine the adequacy of the Property’s original design or existing systems. Although walk-through observations were performed, not all areas were observed (See Section 4.2 for areas observed). There may be defects in the Property, which were in areas not observed or readily accessible, may not have been visible, or were not disclosed by management personnel when questioned. The report describes property conditions at the time that the observations and research were conducted. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for the use of City of Yorkville for the purpose stated within Section 2 of this report. The report, or any excerpt thereof, shall not be used by any party other than City of Yorkville or for any other purpose than that specifically stated in our agreement or within Section 2 of this report without the express written consent of EMG. Any reuse or distribution of this report without such consent shall be at City of Yorkville and the recipient’s sole risk, without liability to EMG. Prepared by: Paul Prusa P.E., LEED AP Project Manager Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 25 11. Appendices Appendix A: Photographic Record Appendix B: Site Plan Appendix C: Supporting Documentation Appendix D: EMG Accessibility Checklist Appendix E: Pre-Survey Questionnaire PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 Appendix A: Photographic Record Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #1: FRONT ELEVATION #2: RIGHT ELEVATION #3: LEFT ELEVATION #4: REAR ELEVATION #5: PARKING LOTS, ASPHALT PAVEMENT #6: SIDEWALK, CLAY BRICK/MASONRY PAVERS Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #7: PEDESTRIAN PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, CONCRETE #8: FENCES & GATES, WOOD BOARD #9: FENCES & GATES, CHAIN LINK #10: PLAY STRUCTURE, PRE- SCHOOL #11: EXTERIOR WALL, ALUMINUM SIDING #12: EXTERIOR DOOR, FULLY- GLAZED ALUMINUM-FRAMED SWINGING MOTOR-OPERATED Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #13: EXTERIOR DOOR, STEEL #14: STOREFRONT, METAL-FRAMED WINDOWS #15: WINDOW, ALUMINUM DOUBLE- GLAZED AWNING #16: WINDOW, ALUMINUM DOUBLE- GLAZED, SMALL #17: CONDENSING UNIT, SPLIT SYSTEM #18: AIR HANDLER, INTERIOR Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #19: TOILET, TANKLESS (WATER CLOSET) #20: LAVATORY, VITREOUS CHINA #21: SINK, STAINLESS STEEL #22: WATER HEATER, GAS #23: LIGHTING SYSTEM, INTERIOR #24: METAL HALIDE LIGHTING FIXTURE Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #25: HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LIGHTING FIXTURE #26: COMPACT FLUORESCENT LIGHTING FIXTURE #27: MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL #28: FIRE EXTINGUISHER #29: EMERGENCY/EXIT COMBO #30: KITCHEN CABINET, BASE AND WALL SECTION, WOOD Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #31: INTERIOR DOOR, STEEL #32: INTERIOR DOOR, WOOD HOLLOW-CORE #33: INTERIOR DOOR, BI-FOLD #34: INTERIOR DOOR, FULLY-GLAZED ALUMINUM-FRAMED SWINGING #35: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, PAINTED STRUCTURE #36: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, CMU Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #37: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, GYPSUM BOARD #38: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, ACOUSTICAL TILE (ACT) #39: STAINED ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE #40: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, CERAMIC TILE #41: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, VINYL TILE (VCT) #42: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, CARPET STANDARD- COMMERCIAL MEDIUM-TRAFFIC Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #43: INTERIOR WINDOW #44: RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES, REFRIGERATOR #45: INTERIOR DOOR, FIRE 90- MINUTES AND OVER #46: INTERIOR DOOR, FULLY-GLAZED WOOD-FRAMED #47: STORAGE SHED PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 Appendix B: Site Plan Site Plan Project Name: Park & Rec Office Project Number: 122700.17R000-011.322 Source: Google Maps On-Site Date: May 23, 2017 PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 Appendix C: Supporting Documentation www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 THIS APPENDIX INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 Appendix D: EMG Accessibility Checklist Page 1 of 4 Date Completed: June 30, 2017 Property Name: Park & Rec Office EMG Project Number: 122700.17R000-011.322 Building History Yes No Unk Comments 1 Has an ADA survey previously been completed for this property? X 2 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? X 3 Does a Transition Plan / Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? X 4 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints that have not been resolved? X 5 Is any litigation pending related to ADA issues? X Parking Yes No NA Comments 1 Are there sufficient accessible parking spaces with respect to the total number of reported spaces? X 2 Are there sufficient van-accessible parking spaces available? X 3 Are accessible spaces marked with the International Symbol of Accessibility? Are there signs reading “Van Accessible” at van spaces? X 4 Is there at least one accessible route provided within the boundary of the site from public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones, if provided, and public streets and sidewalks? X 5 Do curbs on the accessible route have depressed, ramped curb cuts at drives, paths, and drop-offs? X 6 If required does signage exist directing you to accessible parking and an accessible building entrance? X Ramps Yes No NA Comments 1* Do all ramps along accessible path of travel appear to meet slope requirements? ( 1:12 or less) X 2 Are ramps that appear longer than 6 ft complete with railings on both sides? X Page 2 of 4 Ramps (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 3 Does the width between railings appear at least 36 inches? X 4 Is there a level landing for approximately every 30 ft horizontal length of ramp, at the top and at the bottom of ramps and switchbacks? X Entrances/Exits Yes No NA Comments 1 Do all required accessible entrance doorways appear at least 32 inches wide and not a revolving door? X 2 If the main entrance is inaccessible, are there alternate accessible entrances? X 3 Is the door hardware easy to operate (lever/push type hardware, no twisting required and not higher than approximately 48 inches above the floor)? X Paths of Travel Yes No NA Comments 1 Are all paths of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair (appear at least 36 inches wide)? X 2 Are wheelchair-accessible facilities (toilet rooms, exits, etc.) identified with signage? X 3 Is there a path of travel that does not require the use of stairs? X Elevators Yes No NA Comments 1 Do the call buttons have visual and audible signals to indicate when a call is registered and answered when car arrives? X 2 Are there visual and audible signals inside cars indicating floor change? X 3 Are there standard raised and Braille marking on both jambs of each hoist way entrance as well as all cab/call buttons? X Page 3 of 4 Elevators (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 4 Do elevator doors have a reopening device that will stop and reopen a car door if an object or a person obstructs the door? X 5 Are elevator controls low enough to be reached from a wheelchair (appears to be between 15 and 48 inches)? X 6 If a two-way emergency communication system is provided within the elevator cab, is it usable without voice communication? X Toilet Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 Are common area public restrooms located on an accessible route? X 2 Are pull handles push/pull or lever type? X 3 Are there audible and visual fire alarm devices in the toilet rooms? X 4 Are toilet room access doors wheelchair- accessible (appear to be at least 32 inches wide)? X Toilet Rooms (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 5 Are public restrooms large enough to accommodate a wheelchair turnaround (appear to have 60” turning diameter)? X 6 In unisex toilet rooms, are there safety alarms with pull cords? X 7 Are toilet stall doors wheelchair accessible (appear to be at least 32” wide)? X 8 Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? X 9 Are sinks provided with clearance for a wheelchair to roll under (appear to have 29” clearance)? X 10 Are sink handles operable with one hand without grasping, pinching or twisting? X 11 Are exposed pipes under sink sufficiently insulated against contact? X Page 4 of 4 Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 How many total accessible sleeping rooms does the property management report to have? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible sleeping rooms with respect to the total number of reported guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X 2 How many of the accessible sleeping rooms per property management have roll- in showers? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible rooms with roll-in showers with respect to the total number of reported accessible guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X 3 How many assistive listening kits and/or rooms with communication features are available per property management? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported assistive listening devices with respect to the total number of rooms? See attached hot sheet. X Pools Yes No NA Comments 1 Are public access pools provided? If the answer is no, please disregard this section. X 2 How many accessible access points are provided to each pool/spa? Provide number in comment field. Is at least one fixed lift or sloped entry to the pool provided? X Play Area Yes No NA Comments 1 Has the play area been reviewed for accessibility? All public playgrounds are subject to ADAAG standards. X Exercise Equipment Yes No NA Comments 1 Does there appear to be adequate clear floor space around the machines/equipment (30” by 48” minimum)? X *Based on visual observation only. The slope was not confirmed through measurements. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 Appendix E: Pre-Survey Questionnaire 1 PP RR OO PP EE RR TT YY CC OO NN DD II TT II OO NN AA SS SS EE SS SS MM EE NN TT :: PP RR EE --SS UU RR VV EE YY QQ UU EE SS TT II OO NN NN AA II RR EE This questionnaire must be completed by the property owner, the owner's designated representative, or someone knowledgeable about the subject property. The completed form must be presented to EMG's Field Observer on the day of the site visit. If the form is not completed, EMG’s Project Manager will require additional time during the on-site visit with such a knowledgeable person in order to complete the questionnaire. During the site visit, EMG's Field Observer may ask for details associated with selected questions. This questionnaire will be utilized as an exhibit in EMG's final Property Condition Report. Name of person completing questionnaire: Association with property: Length of association with property: Date Completed: Phone Number: Property Name: EMG Project Number: Directions: Please answer all questions to the best of your knowledge and in good faith. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. INSPECTIONS DATE LAST INSPECTED LIST ANY OUTSTANDING REPAIRS REQUIRED 1 Elevators 2 HVAC, Mechanical, Electric, Plumbing 3 Life-Safety/Fire 4 Roofs QUESTION RESPONSE 5 List any major capital improvement within the last three years. 6 List any major capital expenditures planned for the next year. 7 What is the age of the roof(s)? 8 What building systems (HVAC, roof, interior/exterior finishes, paving, etc.) are the responsibilities of the tenant to maintain and replace? 2 Mark the column corresponding to the appropriate response. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. (NA indicates “Not Applicable”, Unk indicates “Unknown”) QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENTS Y N Unk NA 9 Are there any unresolved building, fire, or zoning code issues? 10 Are there any "down" or unusable units? 11 Are there any problems with erosion, stormwater drainage or areas of paving that do not drain? 12 Is the property served by a private water well? 13 Is the property served by a private septic system or other waste treatment systems? 14 Are there any problems with foundations or structures? 15 Is there any water infiltration in basements or crawl spaces? 16 Are there any wall, or window leaks? 17 Are there any roof leaks? 18 Is the roofing covered by a warranty or bond? 19 Are there any poorly insulated areas? 20 Is Fire Retardant Treated (FRT) plywood used? 21 Is exterior insulation and finish system (EIFS) or a synthetic stucco finish used? 22 Are there any problems with the utilities, such as inadequate capacities? 23 Are there any problems with the landscape irrigation systems? 24 Has a termite/wood boring insect inspection been performed within the last year? 25 Do any of the HVAC systems use R-11, 12, or 22 refrigerants? 26 Has any part of the property ever contained visible suspect suspect fungal growth growth? 3 Mark the column corresponding to the appropriate response. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. (NA indicates “Not Applicable”, Unk indicates “Unknown”) QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENTS Y N Unk NA 27 Is there a suspect fungal growth Operations and Maintenance Plan? 28 Have there been indoor air quality or suspect fungal growth related complaints from tenants? 29 Is polybutylene piping used? 30 Are there any plumbing leaks or water pressure problems? 31 Are there any leaks or pressure problems with natural gas service? 32 Does any part of the electrical system use aluminum wiring? 33 Do Residential units have a less than 60-Amp service? 34 Do Commercial units have less than 200-Amp service? 35 Are there any recalled fire sprinkler heads (Star, GEM, Central, Omega)? 36 Is there any pending litigation concerning the property? 37 Has the management previously completed an ADA review? 38 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? 39 Does a Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? 40 Has the Barrier Removal Plan been approved by an arms-length third party? 41 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints? 42 Does elevator equipment require upgrades to meet ADA standards? 43 Are there any problems with exterior lighting? 44 Are there any other significant issues/hazards with the property? 4 Mark the column corresponding to the appropriate response. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. (NA indicates “Not Applicable”, Unk indicates “Unknown”) QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENTS Y N Unk NA 45 Are there any unresolved construction defects at the property? _______________________________________________________________________________ Signature of person Interviewed or completing form Date 5 PP RR OO PP EE RR TT YY CC OO NN DD II TT II OO NN AA SS SS EE SS SS MM EE NN TT :: DD OO CC UU MM EE NN TT RR EE QQ UU EE SS TT On the day of the site visit, provide EMG's Field Observer access to all of the available documents listed below. Provide copies if possible. Your timely compliance with this request is greatly appreciated.  All available construction documents (blueprints) for the original construction of the building or for any tenant improvement work or other recent construction work.  A site plan, preferably 8 1/2" X 11", which depicts the arrangement of buildings, roads, parking stalls, and other site features.  For commercial properties, provide a tenant list which identifies the names of each tenant, vacant tenant units, the floor area of each tenant space, and the gross and net leasable area of the building(s).  For apartment properties, provide a summary of the apartment unit types and apartment unit type quantities, including the floor area of each apartment unit as measured in square feet.  For hotel or nursing home properties, provide a summary of the room types and room type quantities.  Copies of Certificates of Occupancy, building permits, fire or health department inspection reports, elevator inspection certificates, roof or HVAC warranties, or any other similar, relevant documents.  The names of the local utility companies which serve the property, including the water, sewer, electric, gas, and phone companies.  The company name, phone number, and contact person of all outside vendors who serve the property, such as mechanical contractors, roof contractors, fire sprinkler or fire extinguisher testing contractors, and elevator contractors.  A summary of recent (over the last 5 years) capital improvement work which describes the scope of the work and the estimated cost of the improvements. Executed contracts or proposals for improvements. Historical costs for repairs, improvements, and replacements.  Records of system & material ages (roof, MEP, paving, finishes, and furnishings).  Any brochures or marketing information.  Appraisal, either current or previously prepared.  Current occupancy percentage and typical turnover rate records (for commercial and apartment properties).  Previous reports pertaining to the physical condition of property.  ADA survey and status of improvements implemented.  Current / pending litigation related to property condition. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 On the day of the site visit, provide EMG's Field Observer access to all of the available documents listed below. Provide copies if possible. INFORMATION REQUIRED 1. All available construction documents (blueprints) for the original construction of the building or for any tenant improvement work or other recent construction work. 2. A site plan, preferably 8 1/2" X 11", which depicts the arrangement of buildings, roads, parking stalls, and other site features. 3. For commercial properties, provide a tenant list which identifies the names of each tenant, vacant tenant units, the floor area of each tenant space, and the gross and net leasable area of the building(s). 4. For apartment properties, provide a summary of the apartment unit types and apartment unit type quantities, including the floor area of each apartment unit as measured in square feet. 5. For hotel or nursing home properties, provide a summary of the room types and room type quantities. 6. Copies of Certificates of Occupancy, building permits, fire or health department inspection reports, elevator inspection certificates, roof or HVAC warranties, or any other similar, relevant documents. 7. The names of the local utility companies which serve the property, including the water, sewer, electric, gas, and phone companies. 8. The company name, phone number, and contact person of all outside vendors who serve the property, such as mechanical contractors, roof contractors, fire sprinkler or fire extinguisher testing contractors, and elevator contractors. 9. A summary of recent (over the last 5 years) capital improvement work which describes the scope of the work and the estimated cost of the improvements. Executed contracts or proposals for improvements. Historical costs for repairs, improvements, and replacements. 10. Records of system & material ages (roof, MEP, paving, finishes, furnishings). 11. Any brochures or marketing information. 12. Appraisal, either current or previously prepared. 13. Current occupancy percentage and typical turnover rate records (for commercial and apartment properties). 14. Previous reports pertaining to the physical condition of property. 15. ADA survey and status of improvements implemented. 16. Current / pending litigation related to property condition. Your timely compliance with this request is greatly appreciated. Prepared for: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT Public Works Office and Garage 610 Tower Lane Yorkville, Illinois 60560 PREPARED BY: EMG CONTACT: EMG Andrew Hupp 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Senior Engineering Consultant Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 800.733.0660 x6632 800.733.0660 arhupp@emgcorp.com www.EMGcorp.com EMG Project Number: Date of Report: On Site Date: 122700.17R000-030.322 September 13, 2017 May 22, 2017 September 11, 2017 EMG Corporate Headquarters 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100, Owings Mills, MD 21117 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition ................................................................ 1 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations ...................................................................... 3 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Scope .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Personnel Interviewed ................................................................................................................. 6 2.4. Documentation Reviewed ........................................................................................................... 7 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire ........................................................................................................... 7 2.6. Weather Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 7 3. Accessibility and Property Research ................................................................................................. 8 3.1. ADA Accessibility ........................................................................................................................ 8 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone ................................................................ 8 4. Existing Building Assessment ............................................................................................................ 9 4.1. Unit or Space Types .................................................................................................................... 9 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed ...................................................................... 9 5. Site Improvements ............................................................................................................................. 10 5.1. Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 10 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks ................................................................................................ 10 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control .................................................................................... 11 5.4. Topography and Landscaping ................................................................................................... 12 5.5. General Site Improvements ....................................................................................................... 12 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems ............................................................................... 14 6.1. Foundations ............................................................................................................................... 14 6.2. Superstructure ........................................................................................................................... 14 6.3. Roofing ...................................................................................................................................... 14 6.4. Exterior Walls ............................................................................................................................ 15 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs ......................................................................................................... 16 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors ..................................................................................................... 16 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony ...................................................................................................... 16 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems .................................................................................. 17 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) ..................................................... 17 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water ............................................................................. 18 7.3. Building Gas Distribution ........................................................................................................... 19 7.4. Building Electrical ...................................................................................................................... 19 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems .............................................................................. 20 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems ....................................................................................... 20 7.7. Life Support Systems ................................................................................................................ 21 8. Interior Spaces .................................................................................................................................... 22 8.1. Interior Finishes ......................................................................................................................... 22 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment .............................................................................. 23 9. Other Structures ................................................................................................................................. 24 10. Certification ......................................................................................................................................... 25 11. Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 26 PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 1 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition The property information is summarized in the table below. More detailed descriptions may be found in the various sections of the report and in the Appendices. Property Information Address: 610 Tower Lane, Yorkville, IL 60560 Year Constructed/Renovated: 1976 – Office 1996 - Garage Current Occupants: City of Yorkville Percent Utilization: 100%. Management Point of Contact: City of Yorkville, Mr. Peter Ratos 630.553.8574 phone pratos@yorkville.il.us email Property Type: Office, Garage Site Area: 2.0 acres Building Area: 8,820 SF Number of Buildings: 1 Number of Stories: 1 Parking Type and Number of Spaces: 9 spaces in open lots Building Construction: Steel frame with concrete-topped metal decks Roof Construction: Sloped roofing with metal finish Exterior Finishes: Metal Siding Heating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning: Individual package split-system units. Supplemental components: suspended gas unit heaters and window air conditioning unit. Fire and Life/Safety: Smoke detectors, strobes, extinguishers, and exit signs. Dates of Visit: May 22, 2017 On-Site Point of Contact (POC): Eric Dhuse Assessment and Report Prepared by: Tammy Prusa Reviewed by: Paul Prusa P.E., LEED AP Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 Systemic Condition Summary Site Fair HVAC Fair Structure Good Plumbing Fair Roof Fair Electrical Fair Vertical Envelope Fair Elevators -- PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 2 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Systemic Condition Summary Interiors Fair Fire -- The following bullet points highlight the most significant short term and modernization recommendations:  Repair damage to right elevation exterior wall  Installation of a complete fire alarm system  Mill and overlay asphalt parking lot  Installation of a complete fire suppression system Generally, the property appears to have been constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained since it was first occupied and is in fair overall condition. The property has had no major capital improvements. The property is less than 32 years old and has not required any major capital improvements. 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate the FCI, which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. Two FCI ratios are calculated and presented, the Current Year and Ten-Year. The Current Year FCI is the ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to the building’s Current Replacement Value. Similarly, the Ten-Year FCI is the ratio of anticipated Capital Reserve Needs over the next ten years to the Current Replacement Value. FCI Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value Good In new or well-maintained condition, with no visual evidence of wear, soiling or other deficiencies. 0% to 5% Fair Subjected to wear and soiling but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. > than 5% to 10% Poor Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. > than 10% to 60% Very Poor Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal is now necessary. > than 60% PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 3 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 The graphs above and tables below represent summary-level findings for the FCA. The deficiencies identified in this assessment can be combined with potential new construction requirements to develop an overall strategy that can serve as the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy. Key findings from the assessment include: Key Finding Metric Current Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (IR)/(CRV) 6.0% Fair 10-Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (RR)/(CRV) 78.4% Poor Current Replacement Value (CRV) 8,820 SF * $183.24 / SF = $1,616,176.80 Year 0 (Current Year) - Immediate Repairs (IR) $97,079.00 Years 1-10 – Replacement Reserves (RR) $1,267,069.00 Total Capital Needs $1,364,148.00 The major issues contributing to the Immediate Repair Costs and the Current Year FCI ratio are summarized below:  Repair damage to right elevation exterior wall  Installation of a complete fire alarm system  Installation of a complete fire suppression system  Add signage and marking for ADA Van accessible parking stall Further detail on the specific costs that make up the Immediate Repair Costs can be found in the cost tables at the beginning of this report. 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations As part of the FCA, a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) was performed to determine the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. Property personnel were interviewed concerning any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Sampling is not a part of this assessment. There are no visual indications of the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, or evidence of moisture in representative readily accessible areas of the property. 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost Cost estimates are attached at the front of this report (following the cover page). These estimates are based on Invoice or Bid Document/s provided either by the Owner/facility and construction costs developed by construction resources such as R.S. Means and Marshall & Swift, EMG’s experience with past costs for similar properties, city cost indexes, and assumptions regarding future economic conditions. Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary, order of magnitude budgets. Actual costs most probably will vary from the consultant’s opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy, quality of materials and installation, manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected, field conditions, whether a physical deficiency is repaired or replaced in whole, phasing of the work (if applicable), quality of contractor, quality of project management exercised, market conditions, and whether competitive pricing is solicited, etc. ASTM E2018-08 recognizes that certain opinions of probable costs cannot be developed within the scope of this guide without further study. Opinions of probable cost for further study should be included in the FCA. PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 4 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1.4.1. Methodology Based upon site observations, research, and judgment, along with referencing Expected Useful Life (EUL) tables from various industry sources, EMG opines as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement. Accurate historical replacement records, if provided, are typically the best source of information. Exposure to the elements, initial quality and installation, extent of use, the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised, etc., are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component. As a result, a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual chronological age. The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age. Projections of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) are based on continued use of the Property similar to the reported past use. Significant changes in occupants and/or usage may affect the service life of some systems or components. Where quantities could not be derived from an actual take-off, lump sum costs or allowances are used. Estimated costs are based on professional judgment and the probable or actual extent of the observed defect, inclusive of the cost to design, procure, construct and manage the corrections. 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs Immediate repairs are opinions of probable costs that require immediate action as a result of: (1) material existing or potential unsafe conditions, (2) material building or fire code violations, or (3) conditions that, if not addressed, have the potential to result in, or contribute to, critical element or system failure within one year or will most probably result in a significant escalation of its remedial cost. 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves Replacement Reserves are for recurring probable expenditures, which are not classified as operation or maintenance expenses. The replacement reserves should be budgeted for in advance on an annual basis. Replacement Reserves are reasonably predictable both in terms of frequency and cost. However, Replacement Reserves may also include components or systems that have an indeterminable life but, nonetheless, have a potential for failure within an estimated time period. Replacement Reserves exclude systems or components that are estimated to expire after the reserve term and are not considered material to the structural and mechanical integrity of the subject property. Furthermore, systems and components that are not deemed to have a material effect on the use of the Property are also excluded. Costs that are caused by acts of God, accidents, or other occurrences that are typically covered by insurance, rather than reserved for, are also excluded. Replacement costs are solicited from ownership/property management, EMG’s discussions with service companies, manufacturers' representatives, and previous experience in preparing such schedules for other similar facilities. Costs for work performed by the ownership’s or property management’s maintenance staff are also considered. EMG’s reserve methodology involves identification and quantification of those systems or components requiring capital reserve funds within the assessment period. The assessment period is defined as the effective age plus the reserve term. Additional information concerning system’s or component’s respective replacement costs (in today's dollars), typical expected useful lives, and remaining useful lives were estimated so that a funding schedule could be prepared. The Replacement Reserves Schedule presupposes that all required remedial work has been performed or that monies for remediation have been budgeted for items defined in the Immediate Repair Cost Estimate. PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 5 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2. Purpose and Scope 2.1. Purpose EMG was retained by the client to render an opinion as to the Property’s current general physical condition on the day of the site visit. Based on the observations, interviews and document review outlined below, this report identifies significant deferred maintenance issues, existing deficiencies, and material code violations of record at municipal offices, which affect the Property’s use. Opinions are rendered as to its structural integrity, building system condition and the Property’s overall condition. The report also notes building systems or components that have realized or exceeded their typical expected useful lives. CONDITIONS: The physical condition of building systems and related components are typically defined as being in one of five conditions: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Failed or a combination thereof. For the purposes of this report, the following definitions are used: Excellent = New or very close to new; component or system typically has been installed within the past year, sound and performing its function. Eventual repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Good = Satisfactory as-is. Component or system is sound and performing its function, typically within the first third of its lifecycle. However, it may show minor signs of normal wear and tear. Repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Fair = Showing signs of wear and use but still satisfactory as-is, typically near the median of its estimated useful life. Component or system is performing adequately at this time but may exhibit some signs of wear, deferred maintenance, or evidence of previous repairs. Repair or replacement will be required due to the component or system’s condition and/or its estimated remaining useful life. Poor = Component or system is significantly aged, flawed, functioning intermittently or unreliably; displays obvious signs of deferred maintenance; shows evidence of previous repair or workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards; has become obsolete; or exhibits an inherent deficiency. The present condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of contiguous elements or systems. Either full component replacement is needed or repairs are required to restore to good condition, prevent premature failure, and/or prolong useful life. Failed = Component or system has ceased functioning or performing as intended. Replacement, repair, or other significant corrective action is recommended or required. Not Applicable = Assigning a condition does not apply or make logical sense, most commonly due to the item in question not being present. Throughout sections 5 through 9 of this report, each report section will typically contain three subsections organized in the following sequence:  A descriptive table (and/or narrative), which identifies the components assessed, their condition, and other key data points.  A simple bulleted list of Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements, which lists components and assets typically in Excellent, Good, or Fair condition at the time of the assessment but that will require replacement or some other attention once aged past their estimated useful life. These listed components are typically included in the associated inventory database with costs identified and budgeted beyond the first several years.  A bulleted cluster of Actions/Comments, which include more detailed narratives describing deficiencies, recommended repairs, and short term replacements. The assets and components associated with these bullets are/were typically problematic and in Poor or Failed condition at the time of the assessment, with corresponding costs included within the first few years. PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 6 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PLAN TYPES: Each line item in the cost database is assigned a Plan Type, which is the primary reason or rationale for the recommended replacement, repair, or other corrective action. This is the “why” part of the equation. A cost or line item may commonly have more than one applicable Plan Type; however, only one Plan Type will be assigned based on the “best” fit, typically the one with the greatest significance. The following Plan Types are listed in general weighted order of importance: Safety = An observed or reported unsafe condition that if left unaddressed could result in an injury; a system or component that presents a potential liability risk. Performance/Integrity = Component or system has failed, is almost failing, performs unreliably, does not perform as intended, and/or poses a risk to overall system stability. Accessibility = Does not meet ADA, UFAS, and/or other handicap accessibility requirements. Environmental = Improvements to air or water quality, including removal of hazardous materials from the building or site. Modernization/Adaptation = Conditions, systems, or spaces that need to be upgraded in appearance or function to meet current standards, facility usage, or client/occupant needs. Lifecycle/Renewal = Any component or system in which future repair or replacement is anticipated beyond the next several years and/or is of minimal substantial early-term consequence. 2.2. Scope The standard scope of the Facility Condition Assessment includes the following:  Visit the Property to evaluate the general condition of the building and site improvements, review available construction documents in order to familiarize ourselves with, and be able to comment on, the in-place construction systems, life safety, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and the general built environment.  Identify those components that are exhibiting deferred maintenance issues and provide cost estimates for Immediate Costs and Replacement Reserves based on observed conditions, maintenance history and industry standard useful life estimates. This will include the review of documented capital improvements completed within the last five-year period and work currently contracted for, if applicable.  Provide a full description of the Property with descriptions of in-place systems and commentary on observed conditions.  Provide a general statement of the subject Property’s compliance to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This will not constitute a full ADA survey, but will help identify exposure to issues and the need for further review.  Perform a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) for the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. EMG will also interview Project personnel regarding the presence of any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Potentially affected areas will be photographed. Sampling will not be considered in routine assessments.  List the current utility service providers.  Review maintenance records and procedures with the in-place maintenance personnel.  Observe a representative sample of the interior spaces/units, including vacant spaces/units, in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas to be observed include the exterior of the property, the roofs, interior common areas, and the significant mechanical, electrical and elevator equipment rooms.  Provide an Executive Summary at the beginning of this report.  Prepare a mechanical equipment inventory list. 2.3. Personnel Interviewed The management was interviewed for specific information relating to the physical property, available maintenance procedures, historical performance of key building systems and components, available drawings and other documentation. The following personnel from the facility and government agencies were interviewed in the process of conducting the FCA: Name and Title Organization Phone Number Eric Dhuse City of Yorkville 630.878.7102 PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 7 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 The FCA was performed with the assistance of Eric Dhuse, City of Yorkville, the onsite Point of Contact (POC), who was cooperative and provided information that appeared to be accurate based upon subsequent site observations. The onsite contact is completely knowledgeable about the subject property and answered most questions posed during the interview process. The POC’s management involvement at the property has been for the past 23 years. 2.4. Documentation Reviewed Prior to the FCA, relevant documentation was requested that could aid in the knowledge of the subject property’s physical improvements, extent and type of use, and/or assist in identifying material discrepancies between reported information and observed conditions. The review of submitted documents does not include comment on the accuracy of such documents or their preparation, methodology, or protocol. The Documentation Request Form is provided in Appendix E. Although Appendix E provides a summary of the documents requested or obtained, the following list provides more specific details about some of the documents that were reviewed or obtained during the site visit.  No documents available. 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire A Pre-Survey Questionnaire was sent to the POC prior to the site visit. The questionnaire is included in Appendix E. Information obtained from the questionnaire has been used in preparation of this report. 2.6. Weather Conditions May 22, 2017: Clear, with temperatures in the 70’s (°F) and light winds. PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 8 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 3. Accessibility and Property Research 3.1. ADA Accessibility Generally, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by entities to access and use of “areas of public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” on the basis of disability. Regardless of its age, these areas and facilities must be maintained and operated to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). Buildings completed and occupied after January 26, 1992 are required to comply fully with the ADAAG. Existing facilities constructed prior to this date are held to the lesser standard of compliance to the extent allowed by structural feasibility and the financial resources available. As an alternative, a reasonable accommodation pertaining to the deficiency must be made. During the FCA, a limited visual observation for ADA accessibility compliance was conducted. The scope of the visual observation was limited to those areas set forth in EMG’s Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist provided in Appendix D of this report. It is understood by the Client that the limited observations described herein does not comprise a full ADA Compliance Survey, and that such a survey is beyond the scope of EMG’s undertaking. Only a representative sample of areas was observed and, other than as shown on the Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist, actual measurements were not taken to verify compliance. At an office/garage property, the areas considered as a public accommodation besides the site itself and parking, are the exterior accessible route, the interior accessible route up to the tenant lease lines and the interior common areas, including the common area restrooms. The facility does not appear to be accessible with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Elements as defined by the ADAAG that are not accessible as stated within the priorities of Title III, are as follows: Parking  Signage indicating accessible parking spaces for cars and vans are not provided. Entrances/Exits  Lever action hardware is not provided at all accessible locations. Restrooms  Lever action hardware is not provided at all accessible locations.  Modify existing lavatory faucets to paddle type faucets. A full ADA Compliance Survey may reveal additional aspects of the property that are not in compliance. Corrections of these conditions should be addressed from a liability standpoint, but are not necessarily code violations. The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines concern civil rights issues as they pertain to the disabled and are not a construction code, although many local jurisdictions have adopted the Guidelines as such. The cost to address the achievable items noted above is included in the cost tables. 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone Not Applicable PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 9 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 4. Existing Building Assessment 4.1. Unit or Space Types All 8,820 square feet of the building are occupied by a single occupant, City of Yorkville. The spaces are mostly a combination of offices, garages, and supporting restrooms. 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed The interior spaces were observed in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas accessed included the site within the property boundaries, exterior of the property and the roof. Areas of note that were either inaccessible or not observed for other reasons are listed in the table below: Key Spaces Not Observed Room Number Area Access Issues Above bathroom in garage Lack of ladder PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 10 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 5. Site Improvements 5.1. Utilities The following table identifies the utility suppliers and the condition and adequacy of the services. Site Utilities Utility Supplier Condition and Adequacy Sanitary sewer City of Yorkville Good Storm sewer City of Yorkville Good Domestic water City of Yorkville Good Electric service Commonwealth Edison Good Natural gas service Nicor Gas Good Actions/Comments:  According to the POC, the utilities provided are adequate for the property. There are no unique, onsite utility systems such as emergency electrical generators, septic systems, water or waste water treatment plants, or propane gas tanks. 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks Item Description Main Ingress and Egress Tower Lane Access from West Additional Entrances N/A Additional Access from N/A Paving and Flatwork Item Material Last Work Done Condition Entrance Driveway Apron Asphalt - Fair Parking Lot Asphalt - Fair Drive Aisles None - -- Service Aisles None - -- Sidewalks None - -- Curbs None - -- Site Stairs None - -- Pedestrian Ramps None - -- PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 11 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Parking Count Open Lot Carport Private Garage Subterranean Garage Freestanding Parking Structure 9 - - - - Total Number of ADA Compliant Spaces 0 Number of ADA Compliant Spaces for Vans 0 Total Parking Spaces 9 Parking Ratio (Spaces/Apartments) - Method of Obtaining Parking Count Physical count Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Asphalt seal coating  Asphalt pavement mill and overlay  Signage and marking for ADA Van accessible parking stall Actions/Comments:  The asphalt pavement exhibits significant areas of failure and deterioration, such as alligator cracking and localized depressions. The most severely damaged areas of paving must be cut and patched in order to maintain the integrity of the overall pavement system. Complete milling and overlay of the entire lot is also recommended. 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control Drainage System and Erosion Control System Exists At Site Condition Surface Flow ☒ Good Inlets ☐ -- Swales ☐ -- Detention pond ☐ -- Lagoons ☐ -- Ponds ☐ -- Underground Piping ☐ -- Pits ☐ -- Municipal System ☐ -- Dry Well ☐ -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  There is no evidence of storm water runoff from adjacent properties. The storm water system appears to provide adequate runoff capacity. There is no evidence of major ponding or erosion. PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 12 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 5.4. Topography and Landscaping Item Description Site Topography Generally flat. Landscaping Trees Grass Flower Beds Planters Drought Tolerant Plants Decorative Stone None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Landscaping Condition -- Irrigation Automatic Underground Drip Hand Watering None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Irrigation Condition -- Retaining Walls Type Location Condition None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The topography and adjacent uses do not appear to present conditions detrimental to the property. There are no significant areas of erosion. 5.5. General Site Improvements Property Signage Property Signage Post mounted wood Street Address Displayed? Yes Site and Building Lighting Site Lighting None Pole Mounted Bollard Lights Ground Mounted Parking Lot Pole Type ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ -- Building Lighting None Wall Mounted Recessed Soffit ☐ ☒ ☐ Fair PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 13 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Site Fencing Type Location Condition Chain link with metal posts Perimeter Fair Refuse Disposal Refuse Disposal Means of disposal not apparent Dumpster Locations Mounting Enclosure Contracted? Condition None None None No -- Other Site Amenities Description Location Condition Playground Equipment None -- -- Tennis Courts None -- -- Basketball Court None -- -- Swimming Pool None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Signage  Exterior lighting  Site fencing Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 14 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems 6.1. Foundations Building Foundation Item Description Condition Foundation Slab on grade with integral footings Good Basement and Crawl Space None -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  There are no significant signs of settlement, deflection, or movement. 6.2. Superstructure Building Superstructure Item Description Condition Framing / Load-Bearing Walls Steel columns and beams Good Ground Floor Concrete slab Good Upper Floor Framing Wood joists Good Upper Floor Decking Plywood or OSB Fair Roof Framing Steel beams or girders Good Roof Decking Metal decking Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The superstructure is exposed in some locations, which allows for limited observation. Walls and floors appear to be plumb, level, and stable. There are no significant signs of deflection or movement. 6.3. Roofing Primary Roof Type / Geometry Gable Roof Finish Metal Maintenance Outside Contractor Roof Age 21 Yrs PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 15 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Primary Roof Flashing Sheet metal Warranties None Parapet Copings None Roof Drains Gutters and downspouts Fascia Metal Panel Insulation Fiberglass batts Soffits None Skylights No Attics Steel beams Ponding No Ventilation Source-1 Ridge Vents Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 -- Roof Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Metal roof Actions/Comments:  The roof finishes are original. Information regarding roof warranties or bonds was not available. The roofs are maintained by an outside contractor.  There is no evidence of active roof leaks.  There is no evidence of roof deck or insulation deterioration. The roof substrate and insulation should be inspected during any future roof repair or replacement work.  Roof drainage appears to be adequate. Clearing and minor repair of drain system components should be performed regularly as part of the property management’s routine maintenance and operations program.  The attics are not accessible and it could not be determined if there is moisture, water intrusion, or excessive daylight in the attics. 6.4. Exterior Walls Building Exterior Walls Type Location Condition Primary Finish Metal siding Fair Secondary Finish -- -- Accented with -- -- Soffits Not Applicable -- Building sealants (caulking) are located between dissimilar materials, at joints, and around window and door openings. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Metal siding Actions/Comments:  The metal siding has isolated areas of damaged siding along the north and south elevation of the building. The damaged siding must be repaired. PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 16 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs Building Exterior and Interior Stairs Type Description Riser Handrail Balusters Condition Building Exterior Stairs None -- -- -- -- Building Interior Stairs Wood-framed Closed Wood Wood Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors Building Windows Window Framing Glazing Location Window Screen Condition Aluminum framed, operable Double glaze Exterior Walls ☒ Fair Building Doors Main Entrance Doors Door Type Condition Metal, hollow Fair Secondary Entrance Doors Solid core wood Fair Service Doors Metal, hollow Fair Overhead Doors Aluminium Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Windows  Exterior metal doors Actions/Comments:  Damage to double-glazed window on west elevation of building. Outer pane of glass needs to be replaced. 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony Not applicable. There are no patios, terraces, or balconies. PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 17 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems See the Mechanical Equipment List in the Appendices for the quantity, manufacturer’s name, model number, capacity and year of manufacturer of the major mechanical equipment, if available. 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Individual Units Primary Components Split system furnaces and condensing units Cooling (if separate from above) performed via components above Quantity and Capacity Ranges 2 units ranging from 2 tons/BTUH to 5 tons/BTUH Total Heating or Cooling Capacity 7 tons/BTUH Heating Fuel Natural gas Location of Equipment Building exterior Space Served by System Entire building Age Ranges All units dated 2000 Primary Component Condition Fair Supplemental Components Supplemental Component #1 Suspended unit heaters Location / Space Served by Suspended Unit Heaters Garage Suspended Unit Heater Condition Fair Supplemental Component #2 Window Air Conditioning Unit Location / Space Served by Window Air Conditioning Unit Small Upper Office Area Window Air Conditioning Unit Condition Fair Controls and Ventilation HVAC Control System Individual programmable thermostats/controls HVAC Control System Condition Fair Building Ventilation Roof top exhaust fans Ventilation System Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Split system furnaces and condensing units  Suspended gas unit heaters  Through-wall air conditioners  Rooftop exhaust fans PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 18 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  The HVAC systems are maintained by the in-house maintenance staff. Records of the installation, maintenance, upgrades, and replacement of the HVAC equipment at the property have been maintained since the property was first occupied.  The HVAC equipment appears to have been installed in 2000. HVAC equipment is replaced on an "as needed" basis.  The HVAC equipment appears to be functioning adequately overall. No chronic problems were reported and an overall sense of satisfaction with the systems was conveyed. However, due to the inevitable failure of parts and components over time, some of the equipment will require replacement. 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water Building Plumbing System Type Description Condition Water Supply Piping Copper Fair Waste/Sewer Piping Cast iron Fair Vent Piping Cast iron Fair Water Meter Location Bathroom closet in office Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Components Water Heaters Fuel Natural gas Quantity and Input Capacity 2 units at approximately 40,000 BTUH each Storage Capacity 40 gallons Water Heater Condition Fair Supplementary Storage Tanks? No Storage Tank Quantity & Volume -- Quantity of Storage Tanks -- Storage Tank Condition -- Domestic Hot Water Circulation Pumps (3 HP and over) -- Adequacy of Hot Water Adequate Adequacy of Water Pressure Adequate Plumbing Fixtures Water Closets Residential grade Toilet (Water Closet) Flush Rating 1.6 GPF Common Area Faucet Nominal Flow Rate 2.0 GPM Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Water heaters  Toilets  Sinks  Vanities PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 19 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  The plumbing systems appear to be well maintained and functioning adequately. The water pressure appears to be sufficient. No significant repair actions or short-term replacement costs are required. Routine and periodic maintenance is recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components or systems listed above will be required. 7.3. Building Gas Distribution Gas service is supplied from the gas main on the adjacent public street. The gas meters and regulators are located along the exterior walls of the buildings. The gas distribution piping within the building is malleable steel (black iron). Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The pressure and quantity of gas appear to be adequate.  The gas meters and regulators appear to be functioning adequately and will require routine maintenance.  Only limited observation of the gas distribution piping can be made due to hidden conditions. 7.4. Building Electrical Building Electrical Systems Electrical Lines Underground Transformer Pad-mounted Main Service Size 400 Amps Volts 120/240 Volt, single-phase Meter & Panel Location North elevation of building Branch Wiring Copper Conduit Metallic Step-Down Transformers? No Security / Surveillance System? No Building Intercom System? No Lighting Fixtures T-12 Main Distribution Condition Fair Secondary Panel and Transformer Condition Fair Lighting Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Circuit breaker panels  Interior light fixtures Actions/Comments:  The onsite electrical systems up to the meters are owned and maintained by the respective utility company.  The electrical service and capacity appear to be adequate for the property’s demands.  The panels are mostly original 1976 and 1996 components. The electrical service is reportedly adequate for the facility’s needs. However, due to the age of the panels and increasing difficulty of obtaining replacement parts over time, lifecycle replacements are recommended per above. PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 20 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660  The light fixtures throughout most of the facility utilize older, inefficient T-12 lamps. Replacement with newer fixtures with electronic ballasts and T-8 lamps is highly recommended to save substantial amounts of energy. 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems Not applicable. There are no elevators or conveying systems. 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems Item Description Type None Fire Alarm System Central Alarm Panel ☐ Battery-Operated Smoke Detectors ☒ Alarm Horns ☐ Annunciator Panels ☐ Hard-Wired Smoke Detectors ☐ Strobe Light Alarms ☐ Pull Stations ☐ Emergency Battery-Pack Lighting ☒ Illuminated EXIT Signs ☒ Alarm System Condition Fair Sprinkler System None ☒ Standpipes ☐ Backflow Preventer ☐ Hose Cabinets ☐ Fire Pumps ☐ Siamese Connections ☐ Suppression Condition -- Central Alarm Panel System Location of Alarm Panel Installation Date of Alarm Panel None None Fire Extinguishers Last Service Date Servicing Current? 2016 Yes Hydrant Location North elevation of building by door Siamese Location -- Special Systems Kitchen Suppression System ☐Computer Room Suppression System ☐ Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Installation of a complete fire alarm system  Installation of a complete fire suppression system  Exit signs  Fire extinguishers Actions/Comments:  The vast majority of the building is not protected by fire suppression and alarm system. Due to its construction date, the facility is most likely “grandfathered” by code and the installation of fire sprinklers and alarm system was not required until major renovations are performed. Regardless of when or if installation of facility-wide fire suppression and alarm system is required by the governing municipality, EMG recommends a retrofit be performed. A budgetary cost is included. PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 21 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7.7. Life Support Systems Not Applicable PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 22 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 8. Interior Spaces 8.1. Interior Finishes The facility is used as an office building and garage for the City of Yorkville. The most significant interior spaces include offices and garages. Supporting areas include hallways, stairs, administrative offices, restrooms, employee break rooms, and utility closets. The following table generally describes the locations and typical conditions of the interior finishes within the facility: Typical Floor Finishes Floor Finish Locations General Condition Ceramic tile Restrooms Fair Vinyl tile Office, restrooms, break area Fair Hardwood Office Fair Concrete Garage Fair Typical Wall Finishes Wall Finish Locations General Condition Painted drywall Offices, restrooms, break area Fair Metal Garages Fair Ceramic tile Restrooms Fair Typical Ceiling Finishes Ceiling Finish Locations General Condition Painted drywall Offices, restrooms, break area Fair Exposed structure Garages Good Metal Garages Fair Interior Doors Item Type Condition Interior Doors Steel w/ Glass, Wood Hollow-Core Fair Door Framing Wood Fair Fire Doors No -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Vinyl tile  Ceramic tile  Metal wall panel  Metal ceiling panel PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 23 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660  Wood floor  Interior paint  Interior doors  Kitchenette appliances  Laundry room washers  Laundry room dryers Actions/Comments:  It appears that the interior finishes are original.  The ceilings have isolated areas of water-damaged ceilings in the break area. The damaged ceiling areas need to be repaired. The cost to replace the damaged finishes is relatively insignificant and the work can be performed as part of the property management’s routine maintenance program. 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment Not applicable. PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 24 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 9. Other Structures Not applicable. There are no major accessory structures. PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 25 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 10. Certification City of Yorkville retained EMG to perform this Facility Condition Assessment in connection with its continued operation of Public Works Office and Garage, 610 Tower Lane Yorkville, Illinois, the “Property”. It is our understanding that the primary interest of City of Yorkville is to locate and evaluate materials and building system defects that might significantly affect the value of the property and to determine if the present Property has conditions that will have a significant impact on its continued operations. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the brief review of the plans and records made available to our Project Manager during the site visit, interviews of available property management personnel and maintenance contractors familiar with the Property, appropriate inquiry of municipal authorities, our Project Manager’s walk-through observations during the site visit, and our experience with similar properties. No testing, exploratory probing, dismantling or operating of equipment or in-depth studies were performed unless specifically required under Section 2 of this report. This assessment did not include engineering calculations to determine the adequacy of the Property’s original design or existing systems. Although walk-through observations were performed, not all areas were observed (See Section 4.2 for areas observed). There may be defects in the Property, which were in areas not observed or readily accessible, may not have been visible, or were not disclosed by management personnel when questioned. The report describes property conditions at the time that the observations and research were conducted. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for the use of City of Yorkville for the purpose stated within Section 2 of this report. The report, or any excerpt thereof, shall not be used by any party other than City of Yorkville or for any other purpose than that specifically stated in our agreement or within Section 2 of this report without the express written consent of EMG. This report, or any of the information contained therein, is not for the use or benefit of, nor may it be relied upon by any other person or entity, for any purpose without the advance written consent of EMG. Any reuse or distribution without such consent shall be at the client’s or recipient’s sole risk, without liability to EMG. Prepared by: Tammy Prusa, Project Manager Reviewed by: Paul Prusa P.E., LEED AP, Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 26 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 11. Appendices Appendix A: Photographic Record Appendix B: Site Plan Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Appendix D: Pre-Survey Questionnaire PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix A: Photographic Record PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE 610 TOWER LANE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #1: FRONT ELEVATION #2: FRONT ELEVATION-OFFICE #3: FRONT ELEVATION-GARAGE #4: LEFT ELEVATION-GARAGE #5: LEFT ELEVATION-OFFICE #6: REAR ELEVATION PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE 610 TOWER LANE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #7: RIGHT ELEVATION-OFFICE #8: RIGHT ELEVATION-GARAGE #9: PARKING LOTS, ASPHALT PAVEMENT #10: PARKING LOTS, CRACKING IN ASPHALT #11: STRUCTURAL FRAME, STEEL COLUMNS & BEAMS #12: FOUNDATIONS, CONCRETE SLAB-ON-GRADE PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE 610 TOWER LANE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #13: FOUNDATIONS, CONCRETE SLAB-ON-GRADE #14: ROOF, METAL #15: ROOF, METAL #16: EXTERIOR WALL, STEEL #17: EXTERIOR WALL, ALUMINUM SIDING #18: PUNCTURE AND CRACKING TO ALUMINUM SIDING ON SOUTH ELEVATION OF BUILDING PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE 610 TOWER LANE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #19: PUNCTURE TO ALUMINUM SIDING ON NORTH ELEVATION OF BUILDING #20: INTERIOR STAIRS, WOOD #21: WINDOW, ALUMINUM DOUBLE- GLAZED #22: WINDOW, BROKEN PANE OF GLASS #23: OVERHEAD DOOR, ALUMINUM ROLL-UP #24: EXTERIOR DOOR, STEEL PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE 610 TOWER LANE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #25: EXTERIOR DOOR, WOOD SOLID- CORE W/ GLASS #26: RESIDENTIAL FIXTURES, CEILING FAN #27: CONDENSING UNIT, SPLIT SYSTEM #28: AIR CONDITIONER, WINDOW/THRU-WALL #29: UNIT HEATER, NATURAL GAS #30: EXHAUST FAN, PROPELLER PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE 610 TOWER LANE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #31: TOILET, FLUSH TANK (WATER CLOSET) #32: BATHROOM VANITY CABINET, WOOD, WITH CULTURED MARBLE SINK TOP #33: WATER HEATER, GAS #34: SINK, PLASTIC #35: DRINKING FOUNTAIN, REFRIGERATED #36: OVERHEAD DOOR, AUTOMATIC OPENER PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE 610 TOWER LANE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #37: MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL #38: HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LIGHTING FIXTURE #39: LIGHTING SYSTEM, INTERIOR #40: HALOGEN LIGHTING FIXTURE #41: FIRE EXTINGUISHER #42: EXIT LIGHTING FIXTURE PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE 610 TOWER LANE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #43: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, GYPSUM BOARD #44: INTERIOR DOOR, STEEL W/ GLASS #45: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, CERAMIC TILE #46: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, VINYL TILE (VCT) #47: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, WOOD STRIP #48: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, CERAMIC TILE PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE 610 TOWER LANE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #49: RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES, CLOTHES DRYER #50: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, METAL #51: INTERIOR DOOR, HOLLOW CORE WOOD #52: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, ALUMINUM #53: INTERIOR WINDOW #54: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, CERAMIC TILE PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE 610 TOWER LANE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #55: RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES, CLOTHES WASHER #56: SINK, STAINLESS STEEL #57: RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES, REFRIGERATOR #58: KITCHEN CABINET, BASE AND WALL SECTION, WOOD PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix B: Site Plan Site Plan Project Name: Public Works Office and Garage Project Number: 122700.17R000-030.322 Source: Google Earth On-Site Date: May 22, 2017 PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Page 1 of 4 Date Completed: June 6, 2017 Property Name: Public Works Office and Garage EMG Project Number: 122700.17R000-030.322 Building History Yes No Unk Comments 1 Has an ADA survey previously been completed for this property? X 2 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? X 3 Does a Transition Plan / Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? X 4 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints that have not been resolved? X 5 Is any litigation pending related to ADA issues? X Parking Yes No NA Comments 1 Are there sufficient accessible parking spaces with respect to the total number of reported spaces? X 2 Are there sufficient van-accessible parking spaces available? X 3 Are accessible spaces marked with the International Symbol of Accessibility? Are there signs reading “Van Accessible” at van spaces? X 4 Is there at least one accessible route provided within the boundary of the site from public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones, if provided, and public streets and sidewalks? X 5 Do curbs on the accessible route have depressed, ramped curb cuts at drives, paths, and drop-offs? X 6 If required does signage exist directing you to accessible parking and an accessible building entrance? X Ramps Yes No NA Comments 1* Do all ramps along accessible path of travel appear to meet slope requirements? ( 1:12 or less) X 2 Are ramps that appear longer than 6 ft complete with railings on both sides? X Page 2 of 4 Ramps (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 3 Does the width between railings appear at least 36 inches? X 4 Is there a level landing for approximately every 30 ft horizontal length of ramp, at the top and at the bottom of ramps and switchbacks? X Entrances/Exits Yes No NA Comments 1 Do all required accessible entrance doorways appear at least 32 inches wide and not a revolving door? X 2 If the main entrance is inaccessible, are there alternate accessible entrances? X 3 Is the door hardware easy to operate (lever/push type hardware, no twisting required and not higher than approximately 48 inches above the floor)? X Paths of Travel Yes No NA Comments 1 Are all paths of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair (appear at least 36 inches wide)? X 2 Are wheelchair-accessible facilities (toilet rooms, exits, etc.) identified with signage? X 3 Is there a path of travel that does not require the use of stairs? X Elevators Yes No NA Comments 1 Do the call buttons have visual and audible signals to indicate when a call is registered and answered when car arrives? X 2 Are there visual and audible signals inside cars indicating floor change? X 3 Are there standard raised and Braille marking on both jambs of each hoist way entrance as well as all cab/call buttons? X 4 Do elevator doors have a reopening device that will stop and reopen a car door if an object or a person obstructs the door? X 5 Are elevator controls low enough to be reached from a wheelchair (appears to be between 15 and 48 inches)? X 6 If a two-way emergency communication system is provided within the elevator cab, is it usable without voice communication? X Page 3 of 4 Toilet Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 Are common area public restrooms located on an accessible route? X 2 Are pull handles push/pull or lever type? X 3 Are there audible and visual fire alarm devices in the toilet rooms? X 4 Are toilet room access doors wheelchair- accessible (appear to be at least 32 inches wide)? X 5 Are public restrooms large enough to accommodate a wheelchair turnaround (appear to have 60” turning diameter)? X 6 In unisex toilet rooms, are there safety alarms with pull cords? X 7 Are toilet stall doors wheelchair accessible (appear to be at least 32” wide)? X 8 Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? X 9 Are sinks provided with clearance for a wheelchair to roll under (appear to have 29” clearance)? X 10 Are sink handles operable with one hand without grasping, pinching or twisting? X 11 Are exposed pipes under sink sufficiently insulated against contact? X Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 How many total accessible sleeping rooms does the property management report to have? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible sleeping rooms with respect to the total number of reported guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X Page 4 of 4 Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 2 How many of the accessible sleeping rooms per property management have roll- in showers? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible rooms with roll-in showers with respect to the total number of reported accessible guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X 3 How many assistive listening kits and/or rooms with communication features are available per property management? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported assistive listening devices with respect to the total number of rooms? See attached hot sheet. X Pools Yes No NA Comments 1 Are public access pools provided? If the answer is no, please disregard this section. X 2 How many accessible access points are provided to each pool/spa? Provide number in comment field. Is at least one fixed lift or sloped entry to the pool provided? X Play Area Yes No NA Comments 1 Has the play area been reviewed for accessibility? All public playgrounds are subject to ADAAG standards. X Exercise Equipment Yes No NA Comments 1 Does there appear to be adequate clear floor space around the machines/equipment (30” by 48” minimum)? X *Based on visual observation only. The slope was not confirmed through measurements. PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix D: Pre-Survey Questionnaire PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE AND GARAGE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-030.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 On the day of the site visit, provide EMG's Field Observer access to all of the available documents listed below. Provide copies if possible. INFORMATION REQUIRED 1. All available construction documents (blueprints) for the original construction of the building or for any tenant improvement work or other recent construction work. 2. A site plan, preferably 8 1/2" X 11", which depicts the arrangement of buildings, roads, parking stalls, and other site features. 3. For commercial properties, provide a tenant list which identifies the names of each tenant, vacant tenant units, the floor area of each tenant space, and the gross and net leasable area of the building(s). 4. For apartment properties, provide a summary of the apartment unit types and apartment unit type quantities, including the floor area of each apartment unit as measured in square feet. 5. For hotel or nursing home properties, provide a summary of the room types and room type quantities. 6. Copies of Certificates of Occupancy, building permits, fire or health department inspection reports, elevator inspection certificates, roof or HVAC warranties, or any other similar, relevant documents. 7. The names of the local utility companies which serve the property, including the water, sewer, electric, gas, and phone companies. 8. The company name, phone number, and contact person of all outside vendors who serve the property, such as mechanical contractors, roof contractors, fire sprinkler or fire extinguisher testing contractors, and elevator contractors. 9. A summary of recent (over the last 5 years) capital improvement work which describes the scope of the work and the estimated cost of the improvements. Executed contracts or proposals for improvements. Historical costs for repairs, improvements, and replacements. 10. Records of system & material ages (roof, MEP, paving, finishes, furnishings). 11. Any brochures or marketing information. 12. Appraisal, either current or previously prepared. 13. Current occupancy percentage and typical turnover rate records (for commercial and apartment properties). 14. Previous reports pertaining to the physical condition of property. 15. ADA survey and status of improvements implemented. 16. Current / pending litigation related to property condition. Your timely compliance with this request is greatly appreciated. EMG Corporate Headquarters 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100, Owings Mills, MD 21117 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Prepared for: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT New City Hall 102 East Van Emmon Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560 PREPARED BY: EMG CONTACT: EMG Andrew Hupp 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Senior Engineering Consultant Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 800.733.0660 x6632 800.733.0660 arhupp@emgcorp.com www.EMGcorp.com EMG Project Number: Date of Report: On Site Date: 122700.17R000-001.322 June 13, 2017 May 16, 2017 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition ................................................................ 1 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations ...................................................................... 3 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Scope .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Personnel Interviewed ................................................................................................................. 6 2.4. Documentation Reviewed ........................................................................................................... 7 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire ........................................................................................................... 7 2.6. Weather Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 7 3. Accessibility and Property Research ................................................................................................. 8 3.1. ADA Accessibility ........................................................................................................................ 8 4. Existing Building Assessment ............................................................................................................ 9 4.1. Unit or Space Types .................................................................................................................... 9 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed ...................................................................... 9 5. Site Improvements ............................................................................................................................. 10 5.1. Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 10 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks ................................................................................................ 10 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control .................................................................................... 11 5.4. Topography and Landscaping ................................................................................................... 12 5.5. General Site Improvements ....................................................................................................... 13 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems ............................................................................... 15 6.1. Foundations ............................................................................................................................... 15 6.2. Superstructure ........................................................................................................................... 15 6.3. Roofing ...................................................................................................................................... 16 6.4. Exterior Walls ............................................................................................................................ 17 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs ......................................................................................................... 17 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors ..................................................................................................... 18 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony ...................................................................................................... 18 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems .................................................................................. 19 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) ..................................................... 19 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water ............................................................................. 21 7.3. Building Gas Distribution ........................................................................................................... 22 7.4. Building Electrical ...................................................................................................................... 22 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems .............................................................................. 23 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems ....................................................................................... 24 8. Interior Spaces .................................................................................................................................... 25 8.1. Interior Finishes ......................................................................................................................... 25 9. Other Structures ................................................................................................................................. 27 10. Certification ......................................................................................................................................... 28 11. Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 29 NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 1 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition The property information is summarized in the table below. More detailed descriptions may be found in the various sections of the report and in the Appendices. Property Information Address: 102 East Van Emmon Street, Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Year Constructed/Renovated: Originally constructed 1930s Addition 2002 Partially renovated 2012 to 2014 Current Occupants: None Percent Utilization: 0% Management Point of Contact: Mr. Peter Ratos, Building Code Official, City of Yorkville 630.553.8574 phone Property Type: Municipal Site Area: 3.43 acres Building Area: 14,000 SF Number of Buildings: 1 Number of Stories: 1 Parking Type and Number of Spaces: 41 spaces in open lots Building Construction: Masonry bearing walls and metal-framed roofs. Roof Construction: Flat roofs with built-up membrane. Exterior Finishes: Brick Veneer Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning: Central system with boilers, air handlers, and split system units. Individual package unit. Fire and Life/Safety: Fire sprinklers, hydrants, smoke detectors, alarms, strobes, extinguishers, pull stations, alarm panel, exit signs, and backup light fixtures. Dates of Visit: 5/16/2017 On-Site Point of Contact (POC): Peter Ratos Assessment and Report Prepared by: Kevin Koranda Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 Systemic Condition Summary Site Fair to Poor HVAC Fair Structure Fair Plumbing Fair NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 2 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Systemic Condition Summary Roof Fair to Poor Electrical Fair Vertical Envelope Fair Elevators Fair Interiors Poor Fire Fair The following bullet points highlight the most significant short term and modernization recommendations:  Replace asphalt parking area  Replace site lighting fixtures  Renovate interior spaces  Upgrade building automation system  Upgrade lighting system  Replace main switchgear  Replace air handlers  Upgrade sump pumps and perimeter drainage tile Generally, the property appears to have been constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained in recent years and is in fair overall condition. According to property management personnel, the property has had an active capital improvement expenditure program over the past three years. Capital expenditures include, but are not limited to: roof membrane replacement. The building was newly purchased and the scope of renovations that occurred within the last three years was not clear. Supporting documentation was not provided in support of these claims but some of the work is evident. 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate the FCI, which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. Two FCI ratios are calculated and presented, the Current Year and Ten-Year. The Current Year FCI is the ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to the building’s Current Replacement Value. Similarly, the Ten-Year FCI is the ratio of anticipated Capital Reserve Needs over the next ten years to the Current Replacement Value. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 3 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Fci Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value Good In new or well-maintained condition, with no visual evidence of wear, soiling or other deficiencies. 0% to 5% Fair Subjected to wear and soiling but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. > than 5% to 10% Poor Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. > than 10% to 60% Very Poor Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal is now necessary. > than 60% The graphs above and tables below represent summary-level findings for the FCA. The deficiencies identified in this assessment can be combined with potential new construction requirements to develop an overall strategy that can serve as the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy. Key findings from the assessment include: Key Finding Metric Current Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (IR)/(CRV) 115% VERY POOR 10-Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (RR)/(CRV) 49.1% Poor Current Replacement Value (CRV) 14,000 SF * 78.57 / SF = $1,100,000 Year 0 (Current Year) - Immediate Repairs (IR) $1,268,442 Years 1-10 – Replacement Reserves (RR) $540,971 Total Capital Needs $1,809,413 The major issues contributing to the Immediate Repair Costs and the Current Year FCI ratio are summarized below:  Replace asphalt parking area  Replace site lighting fixtures  Renovate interior spaces  Upgrade building automation system  Upgrade lighting system  Replace main switchgear  Replace air handlers  Upgrade sump pumps and perimeter drainage tile Further detail on the specific costs that make up the Immediate Repair Costs can be found in the cost tables at the beginning of this report. 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations As part of the FCA, a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) was performed to determine the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. Property personnel were interviewed concerning any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Sampling is not a part of this assessment. There are no visual indications of the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, or evidence of moisture in representative readily accessible areas of the property. 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost Cost estimates are attached at the front of this report (following the cover page). These estimates are based on Invoice or Bid Document/s provided either by the Owner/facility and construction costs developed by construction resources such as R.S. Means and Marshall & Swift, EMG’s experience with past costs for similar properties, city cost indexes, and assumptions regarding future economic conditions. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 4 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary, order of magnitude budgets. Actual costs most probably will vary from the consultant’s opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy, quality of materials and installation, manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected, field conditions, whether a physical deficiency is repaired or replaced in whole, phasing of the work (if applicable), quality of contractor, quality of project management exercised, market conditions, and whether competitive pricing is solicited, etc. ASTM E2018-08 recognizes that certain opinions of probable costs cannot be developed within the scope of this guide without further study. Opinions of probable cost for further study should be included in the FCA. 1.4.1. Methodology Based upon site observations, research, and judgment, along with referencing Expected Useful Life (EUL) tables from various industry sources, EMG opines as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement. Accurate historical replacement records, if provided, are typically the best source of information. Exposure to the elements, initial quality and installation, extent of use, the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised, etc., are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component. As a result, a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual chronological age. The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age. Projections of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) are based on continued use of the Property similar to the reported past use. Significant changes in occupants and/or usage may affect the service life of some systems or components. Where quantities could not be derived from an actual take-off, lump sum costs or allowances are used. Estimated costs are based on professional judgment and the probable or actual extent of the observed defect, inclusive of the cost to design, procure, construct and manage the corrections. 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs Immediate repairs are opinions of probable costs that require immediate action as a result of: (1) material existing or potential unsafe conditions, (2) material building or fire code violations, or (3) conditions that, if not addressed, have the potential to result in, or contribute to, critical element or system failure within one year or will most probably result in a significant escalation of its remedial cost. 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves Replacement Reserves are for recurring probable expenditures, which are not classified as operation or maintenance expenses. The replacement reserves should be budgeted for in advance on an annual basis. Replacement Reserves are reasonably predictable both in terms of frequency and cost. However, Replacement Reserves may also include components or systems that have an indeterminable life but, nonetheless, have a potential for failure within an estimated time period. Replacement Reserves exclude systems or components that are estimated to expire after the reserve term and are not considered material to the structural and mechanical integrity of the subject property. Furthermore, systems and components that are not deemed to have a material effect on the use of the Property are also excluded. Costs that are caused by acts of God, accidents, or other occurrences that are typically covered by insurance, rather than reserved for, are also excluded. Replacement costs are solicited from ownership/property management, EMG’s discussions with service companies, manufacturers' representatives, and previous experience in preparing such schedules for other similar facilities. Costs for work performed by the ownership’s or property management’s maintenance staff are also considered. EMG’s reserve methodology involves identification and quantification of those systems or components requiring capital reserve funds within the assessment period. The assessment period is defined as the effective age plus the reserve term. Additional information concerning system’s or component’s respective replacement costs (in today's dollars), typical expected useful lives, and remaining useful lives were estimated so that a funding schedule could be prepared. The Replacement Reserves Schedule presupposes that all required remedial work has been performed or that monies for remediation have been budgeted for items defined in the Immediate Repair Cost Estimate. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 5 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2. Purpose and Scope 2.1. Purpose EMG was retained by the client to render an opinion as to the Property’s current general physical condition on the day of the site visit. Based on the observations, interviews and document review outlined below, this report identifies significant deferred maintenance issues, existing deficiencies, and material code violations of record at municipal offices, which affect the Property’s use. Opinions are rendered as to its structural integrity, building system condition and the Property’s overall condition. The report also notes building systems or components that have realized or exceeded their typical expected useful lives. CONDITIONS: The physical condition of building systems and related components are typically defined as being in one of five conditions: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Failed or a combination thereof. For the purposes of this report, the following definitions are used: Excellent = New or very close to new; component or system typically has been installed within the past year, sound and performing its function. Eventual repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Good = Satisfactory as-is. Component or system is sound and performing its function, typically within the first third of its lifecycle. However, it may show minor signs of normal wear and tear. Repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Fair = Showing signs of wear and use but still satisfactory as-is, typically near the median of its estimated useful life. Component or system is performing adequately at this time but may exhibit some signs of wear, deferred maintenance, or evidence of previous repairs. Repair or replacement will be required due to the component or system’s condition and/or its estimated remaining useful life. Poor = Component or system is significantly aged, flawed, functioning intermittently or unreliably; displays obvious signs of deferred maintenance; shows evidence of previous repair or workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards; has become obsolete; or exhibits an inherent deficiency. The present condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of contiguous elements or systems. Either full component replacement is needed or repairs are required to restore to good condition, prevent premature failure, and/or prolong useful life. Failed = Component or system has ceased functioning or performing as intended. Replacement, repair, or other significant corrective action is recommended or required. Not Applicable = Assigning a condition does not apply or make logical sense, most commonly due to the item in question not being present. FORMAT OF THE BODY OF THE REPORT: Throughout sections 5 through 9 of this report, each report section will typically contain three subsections organized in the following sequence:  A descriptive table (and/or narrative), which identifies the components assessed, their condition, and other key data points.  A simple bulleted list of Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements, which lists components and assets typically in Excellent, Good, or Fair condition at the time of the assessment but that will require replacement or some other attention once aged past their estimated useful life. These listed components are typically included in the associated inventory database with costs identified and budgeted beyond the first several years.  A bulleted cluster of Actions/Comments, which include more detailed narratives describing deficiencies, recommended repairs, and short term replacements. The assets and components associated with these bullets are/were typically problematic and in Poor or Failed condition at the time of the assessment, with corresponding costs included within the first few years. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 6 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PLAN TYPES: Each line item in the cost database is assigned a Plan Type, which is the primary reason or rationale for the recommended replacement, repair, or other corrective action. This is the “why” part of the equation. A cost or line item may commonly have more than one applicable Plan Type; however, only one Plan Type will be assigned based on the “best” fit, typically the one with the greatest significance. The following Plan Types are listed in general weighted order of importance: Safety = An observed or reported unsafe condition that if left unaddressed could result in an injury; a system or component that presents a potential liability risk. Performance/Integrity = Component or system has failed, is almost failing, performs unreliably, does not perform as intended, and/or poses a risk to overall system stability. Accessibility = Does not meet ADA, UFAS, and/or other handicap accessibility requirements. Environmental = Improvements to air or water quality, including removal of hazardous materials from the building or site. Modernization/Adaptation = Conditions, systems, or spaces that need to be upgraded in appearance or function to meet current standards, facility usage, or client/occupant needs. Lifecycle/Renewal = Any component or system in which future repair or replacement is anticipated beyond the next several years and/or is of minimal substantial early-term consequence. 2.2. Scope The standard scope of the Facility Condition Assessment includes the following:  Visit the Property to evaluate the general condition of the building and site improvements, review available construction documents in order to familiarize ourselves with, and be able to comment on, the in-place construction systems, life safety, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and the general built environment.  Identify those components that are exhibiting deferred maintenance issues and provide cost estimates for Immediate Costs and Replacement Reserves based on observed conditions, maintenance history and industry standard useful life estimates. This will include the review of documented capital improvements completed within the last five-year period and work currently contracted for, if applicable.  Provide a full description of the Property with descriptions of in-place systems and commentary on observed conditions.  Provide a general statement of the subject Property’s compliance to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This will not constitute a full ADA survey, but will help identify exposure to issues and the need for further review.  Perform a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) for the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. EMG will also interview Project personnel regarding the presence of any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Potentially affected areas will be photographed. Sampling will not be considered in routine assessments.  List the current utility service providers.  Review maintenance records and procedures with the in-place maintenance personnel.  Observe a representative sample of the interior spaces/units, including vacant spaces/units, in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas to be observed include the exterior of the property, the roofs, interior common areas, and the significant mechanical, electrical and elevator equipment rooms.  Provide recommendations for additional studies, if required, with related budgetary information.  Provide an Executive Summary at the beginning of this report.  Prepare a mechanical equipment inventory list. 2.3. Personnel Interviewed The management staff was interviewed for specific information relating to the physical property, available maintenance procedures, historical performance of key building systems and components, available drawings and other documentation. The following personnel from the facility and government agencies were interviewed in the process of conducting the FCA: Name and Title Organization Phone Number Peter Ratos Building Code Official City of Yorkville 630.553.8574 NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 7 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 The FCA was performed with the assistance of Peter Ratos, Building Code Official, City of Yorkville, the onsite Point of Contact (POC), who was cooperative and provided information that appeared to be accurate based upon subsequent site observations. The onsite contact is completely knowledgeable about the subject property and answered most questions posed during the interview process. The property has only been owned by the city for a very short period of time and the POC was relatively unfamiliar with the facility. 2.4. Documentation Reviewed Prior to the FCA, relevant documentation was requested that could aid in the knowledge of the subject property’s physical improvements, extent and type of use, and/or assist in identifying material discrepancies between reported information and observed conditions. The review of submitted documents does not include comment on the accuracy of such documents or their preparation, methodology, or protocol. The Documentation Request Form is provided in Appendix E. 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire A Pre-Survey Questionnaire was sent to the POC prior to the site visit. The questionnaire is included in Appendix E. Information obtained from the questionnaire has been used in preparation of this report. 2.6. Weather Conditions 5/16/17: Clear, with temperatures in the 60s (°F) and light winds. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 8 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 3. Accessibility and Property Research 3.1. ADA Accessibility Generally, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by entities to access and use of “areas of public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” on the basis of disability. Regardless of its age, these areas and facilities must be maintained and operated to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). Buildings completed and occupied after January 26, 1992 are required to comply fully with the ADAAG. Existing facilities constructed prior to this date are held to the lesser standard of compliance to the extent allowed by structural feasibility and the financial resources available. As an alternative, a reasonable accommodation pertaining to the deficiency must be made. During the FCA, a limited visual observation for ADA accessibility compliance was conducted. The scope of the visual observation was limited to those areas set forth in EMG’s Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist provided in Appendix D of this report. It is understood by the Client that the limited observations described herein does not comprise a full ADA Compliance Survey, and that such a survey is beyond the scope of EMG’s undertaking. Only a representative sample of areas was observed and, other than as shown on the Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist, actual measurements were not taken to verify compliance. The facility does not appear to be accessible with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Elements as defined by the ADAAG that are not accessible as stated within the priorities of Title III, are as follows: Parking  Adequate number of designated parking stalls and signage for cars are not provided.  Adequate number of designated parking stalls and signage for vans are not provided.  Signage indicating accessible parking spaces for cars and vans are not provided.  Curb ramps are required from the parking area to the sidewalks providing access to the building. Paths of Travel  Stair handrails do not extend beyond the top and bottom risers. Elevators  Raised elevator markings at control panel and hall buttons are not provided in Braille and Standard Alphabet.  Audible signals are not provided at floor level changes or elevator lobbies indicating car arrival. Restrooms.  Wrap drain pipes below lavatory with insulation; protect against contact with hot, sharp, or abrasive surfaces.  Add pull station alarm in unisex bathroom. A full ADA Compliance Survey may reveal additional aspects of the property that are not in compliance. Corrections of these conditions should be addressed from a liability standpoint, but are not necessarily code violations. The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines concern civil rights issues as they pertain to the disabled and are not a construction code, although many local jurisdictions have adopted the Guidelines as such. The cost to address the achievable items noted above is included in the cost tables. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 9 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 4. Existing Building Assessment 4.1. Unit or Space Types All 14,000 square feet of the building are currently unoccupied but are planned to be renovated to accommodate the City of Yorkville’s new City Hall. The spaces are mostly vacant. Some leftover finishes from previous occupants, including an office/spa area in the basement, bank vaults on the Second Floor, and restrooms, are still in place. Other spaces include a combination of mechanical and other utility spaces. 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed All of the interior spaces were observed in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas accessed included the site within the property boundaries, exterior of the property and the roof. Areas of note that were either inaccessible or not observed for other reasons are listed in the table below: Key Spaces Not Observed Room Number Area Access Issues NA Basement vault Locked bank vault room and no combination A “down unit” or area is a term used to describe a unit or space that cannot be occupied due to poor conditions such as fire damage, water damage, missing equipment, damaged floor, wall or ceiling surfaces, or other significant deficiencies. There are no down units or areas. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 10 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 5. Site Improvements 5.1. Utilities The following table identifies the utility suppliers and the condition and adequacy of the services. Site Utilities Utility Supplier Condition and Adequacy Sanitary sewer City of Yorkville Good and Adequate Storm sewer City of Yorkville Good and Adequate Domestic water City of Yorkville Good and Adequate Electric service Commonwealth Edison Good and Adequate Natural gas service Nicor Gas Good and Adequate Actions/Comments:  According to the POC, the utilities provided are adequate for the property. There are no unique, onsite utility systems such as septic systems, water or waste water treatment plants, or propane gas tanks. An emergency electrical generator is located on the site. 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks Item Description Main Ingress and Egress East Van Emmon Access from North Additional Entrances Briggs Street Additional Access from West Paving and Flatwork Item Material Last Work Done Condition Entrance Driveway Apron Concrete 2000 Fair Parking Lot Asphalt 1995 Poor Drive Aisles Asphalt 1995 Poor Service Aisles None NA -- Sidewalks Concrete 1995 Fair Curbs Concrete 1995 Fair Site Stairs Concrete 1995 Poor Pedestrian Ramps None NA -- NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 11 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Parking Count Open Lot Carport Private Garage Subterranean Garage Freestanding Parking Structure 41 - - - - Total Number of ADA Compliant Spaces 1 Number of ADA Compliant Spaces for Vans 0 Total Parking Spaces 41 Parking Ratio (Spaces/Apartments) NA Method of Obtaining Parking Count Physical count Exterior Stairs Location Material Handrails Condition Northwest corner Concrete stairs Metal Poor Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Asphalt seal coating  Asphalt pavement  Sidewalks  Site stairs Actions/Comments:  The asphalt pavement exhibits significant areas of deterioration in the form of alligator cracking, raveling, large depressions, and displaced pavement surfaces across the entire lot. Much of the lot is in a state of complete failure requiring full-depth replacement. In order to restore an effective and usable pavement system, the paving must be completely replaced, with the sub-base re-graded and compacted.  The concrete sidewalks have isolated areas of cracking and spalling concrete sidewalks. These areas occur along the sidewalk leading to the main entrance at the south side of the facility. The damaged areas of concrete sidewalks will require lifecycle replacement.  The concrete site stairs at the northeast corner of the facility are in poor condition. The steps are uneven and subsiding. Replacement of these concrete stairs is recommended. 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control Drainage System and Erosion Control System Exists At Site Condition Surface Flow ☐ -- Inlets ☒ Fair Swales ☒ Fair Detention pond ☐ -- Lagoons ☐ -- Ponds ☐ -- NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 12 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Drainage System and Erosion Control System Exists At Site Condition Underground Piping ☒ Fair Pits ☐ -- Municipal System ☒ Fair Dry Well ☐ -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Sump pumps Actions/Comments:  There is no evidence of storm water runoff from adjacent properties.  The facility is reportedly located atop a natural spring. Water damage is evident in the old area of the basement and is presumably a result of this spring. The existing sump pumps are undersized and will require replacement with larger units. The excavation of a larger sump pit and installation of a new larger sump basin will also be required. The approximate cost for this work is included in the cost for the replacement of the two sump pumps.  Additionally, an upgrade of the perimeter drainage tile system is recommended. A budgetary cost for this work is included in the report. 5.4. Topography and Landscaping Item Description Site Topography Slopes steeply down from the east side of the property to the west property line. Landscaping Trees Grass Flower Beds Planters Drought Tolerant Plants Decorative Stone None ☒ ☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Landscaping Condition Fair Irrigation Automatic Underground Drip Hand Watering None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Irrigation Condition -- Retaining Walls Type Location Condition Concrete Adjacent south entrance Fair Concrete Adjacent northeast entrance Fair Concrete South perimeter of parking lot Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 13 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  The topography and adjacent uses do not appear to present conditions detrimental to the property. There are no significant areas of erosion.  Some erosion-control gravel from the sloped area of the site has fallen down onto the curb and asphalt parking area at the east side of the site. This stone should be cleared from the parking area and returned to the adjacent slope. The cost for this work is relatively insignificant and can be accomplished through the city’s routine maintenance program. 5.5. General Site Improvements Property Signage Property Signage Building mounted Street Address Displayed? Yes Site and Building Lighting Site Lighting None Pole Mounted Bollard Lights Ground Mounted Parking Lot Pole Type ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ Fair Building Lighting None Wall Mounted Recessed Soffit ☐ ☒ ☒ Fair REFUSE DISPOSAL Refuse Disposal Individual garbage bins Dumpster Locations Mounting Enclosure Contracted? Condition Trash room Concrete pad None Yes Fair Other Site Amenities Description Location Condition Playground Equipment None -- -- Tennis Courts None -- -- Basketball Court None -- -- Swimming Pool None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Exterior lighting  Site lighting NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 14 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 15 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems 6.1. Foundations Building Foundation Item Description Condition Foundation Concrete foundation walls Fair Basement and Crawl Space None Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  Isolated areas of the foundation systems are exposed, which allows for limited observation. The foundation systems are concealed. There are no significant signs of settlement, deflection, or movement. The basement walls appear intact and structurally sound. There is no evidence of movement or water infiltration. 6.2. Superstructure Building Superstructure Item Description Condition Framing / Load-Bearing Walls Masonry walls Fair Ground Floor Concrete slab Fair Upper Floor Framing Concrete beams Fair Upper Floor Decking Concrete, cast-in-place Fair Roof Framing Open-web steel joists Fair Roof Decking Metal decking Fair to Poor Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The superstructure is exposed in some locations, which allows for limited observation. There is isolated evidence of structural damage due to water intrusion in the older section of the basement. This condition appears to affect the concrete floor decking immediately above the exterior perimeter walls on the west and south side of the basement. The concrete is cracked and deteriorating and several pieces have cracked and come loose. The affected area is approximately 20 SF. The property is reportedly situated near a natural spring and this degradation is presumably due to water from this spring. This concrete will require repairs. Additional repair work will be necessary to divert water from the perimeter of the facility and prevent future damage. This work is discussed in section 5.3. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 16 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6.3. Roofing Primary Roof Type / Geometry Flat Finish Built-up membrane Maintenance In-house Staff Roof Age 3 Yrs Flashing Built-up base and Edge flashing Warranties Unknown Parapet Copings Exposed copings Roof Drains Internal drains Fascia Metal Panel Insulation Rigid Board Soffits None Skylights No Attics None Ponding Yes Ventilation Source-1 Power Vents Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 None Roof Condition Good The primary roof is located over the majority of the building at the newer sections of the facility. Secondary Roof Type / Geometry Flat Finish Built-up membrane Maintenance In-house Staff Roof Age 25 Yrs Flashing Built-up base and Edge flashing Warranties Unknown Parapet Copings Exposed copings Roof Drains Internal drains Fascia Metal Panel Insulation Rigid Board Soffits None Skylights No Attics None Ponding Yes Ventilation Source-1 Power Vents Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 None Roof Condition Poor The secondary roof is located at the older portion of the building at the northwest corner of the facility. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  TPO roof membrane  Modified bituminous roof membrane Actions/Comments:  The roof finishes were reportedly installed in 2014 and 1992 respectively. Information regarding roof warranties or bonds was not available. The roofs are maintained by the in-house maintenance staff. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 17 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660  According to the POC, it is unknown whether there are active roof leaks. Isolated evidence of roof leaks was observed in several locations. Water damaged ceiling finishes were observed: at the interface between the newer and older sections of the building on the upper floor, in the room outside of the main vault at the southwest corner of the building, and in the small coat room adjacent to the narrow stairwell. Additionally, corrosion was observed on the underside of the metal roof decking throughout the upper floor of the facility. It is unclear whether these roof leaks are still active and they are assumed to have been repaired during the most recent roof replacement. All active roof leaks must be repaired.  There is no significant evidence of roof deck or insulation deterioration. The roof substrate and insulation should be inspected during any future roof repair or replacement work.  The field of the older roof has significant areas of cracking, and seam deterioration across the entire roof surface. The roof membrane requires replacement.  Roof drainage appears to be inadequate. Significant areas of ponding are evident across many areas of the roof, including: the center of the facility, the lower potion over the bank vault, and the south of the facility near the package unit.  There are ponding stains and a moderate build-up of debris at some of the drain locations. The affected drains must be cleaned and cleared and debris must be removed from the roof surfaces. 6.4. Exterior Walls Building Exterior Walls Type Location Condition Primary Finish Brick veneer Fair Secondary Finish None -- Accented with None -- Soffits Not Applicable -- Building sealants (caulking) are located between dissimilar materials, at joints, and around window and door openings. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Caulking  Masonry re-pointing Actions/Comments:  Isolated portions of the mortar joints along the brick veneer are cracked along the East Van Emmon elevation. The damaged mortar joints must be cleaned and re-pointed.  There are isolated areas of brittle and deteriorated sealant along the west elevation of the facility. The damaged sealant must be replaced. 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs Building Exterior and Interior Stairs Type Description Riser Handrail Balusters Condition Building Exterior Stairs None None None None -- Building Interior Stairs Steel-framed with pre-cast treads Open Wood Metal Fair Building Interior Stairs Steel-framed with pre-cast treads Closed Wood None Fair NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 18 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors Building Windows Window Framing Glazing Location Window Screen Condition Aluminum framed storefront Double glaze Building exterior ☐ Fair Building Doors Main Entrance Doors Door Type Condition Fully glazed, metal framed Fair Secondary Entrance Doors None -- Service Doors None -- Overhead Doors Vinyl Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Storefront glazing  Exterior storefront doors  Overhead doors Actions/Comments:  The windows display isolated evidence of damaged frames at the center of the east elevation of the building. The damaged window frames must be repaired.  The glazing system has isolated areas of missing or loose gaskets at the east elevation of the building. Several windows were observed to have loose thermal glass, with the most notable example being the windows at the southeast corner of the facility. The damaged or loose gaskets must be replaced. 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony Not applicable. There are no patios, terraces, or balconies. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 19 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems See the Mechanical Equipment List in the Appendices for the quantity, manufacturer’s name, model number, capacity and year of manufacturer of the major mechanical equipment, if available. 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Building Central Heating System Primary Heating System Type Hot water boilers Quantity and Capacity of Major Components 1 boiler at 150 MBH 1 boiler at 900 MBH Total Heating Capacity 1150 MBH Heating Fuel Natural gas Location of Major Equipment Mechanical rooms Space Served by System Entire building Age Ranges Vary from 1980 to 2002 Boiler Condition Fair Heat Exchanger Condition -- Distribution System HVAC Water Distribution System Two-pipe Heating Water Circulation Pump Size and Quantity 2 pumps at 1/6th HP each Pump Condition Fair Air Distribution System Variable volume Quantity and Capacity of Air Handlers 2 air handlers ranging from 6000 to 15000 CFM each Location of Air Handlers Mechanical rooms Large Spaces the Larger Dedicated AHU’s Serve Entire building Age of Air Handlers All units dated 1976 Air Handler Condition Fair Terminal Units None Quantity and Capacity of Terminal Units One hydronic radiator Location of Terminal Units Basement storage room Spaces Served by Terminal Units Storage room Terminal Unit Condition Fair NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 20 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Supplemental Components Supplemental Component #1 Package unit Location / Space Served Rooftop / First Floor, main area Condition Fair Supplemental Component #2 Split system condensing unit Location / Space Served Rooftop / Air handler 1 Condition Fair Supplemental Component #3 Split system condensing unit Location / Space Served Rooftop / Air handler 2 Condition Fair Controls and Ventilation HVAC Control System BAS, pneumatic controls HVAC Control System Condition Poor Building Ventilation Roof top exhaust fans Ventilation System Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Boilers  Air handling units  Air handler fan motors  Duct fans and motors  Distribution pumps and motors  Fan coil units  Package units  Condensing units  Electric wall heaters  Rooftop exhaust fans  Building automation system  Expansion tank Actions/Comments:  The HVAC systems are maintained by an outside contractor. It is unknown whether records of the installation, maintenance, upgrades, and replacement of the HVAC equipment at the property have been maintained.  Approximately 15 percent of the HVAC equipment is original. The HVAC equipment varies in age. HVAC equipment is replaced on an "as needed" basis.  The HVAC equipment appears to be functioning adequately overall. The property management staff was interviewed about the historical and recent performance of the equipment and systems. No chronic problems were reported and an overall sense of satisfaction with the systems was conveyed. However, due to the inevitable failure of parts and components over time, some of the equipment will require replacement. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 21 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660  The air handler fan motors lack variable frequency drives (VFD’s). As the motors are fairly substantial in size, the overall system would benefit from the utilization of VFD’s to reduce full-speed usage and improve efficiency. Installation of VFD’s is highly recommended.  The facility HVAC is controlled using an outdated pneumatic system supplied by an air compressor. For modernization, reliability, and increased control, full conversion to a web-based direct digital control (DDC) platform is highly recommended. 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water Building Plumbing System Type Description Condition Water Supply Piping Copper Fair Waste/Sewer Piping Cast iron Fair Vent Piping Cast iron Fair Water Meter Location Basement riser room Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Components Water Heaters Fuel Natural gas Quantity and Input Capacity 1 unit at 129,999 BTU/h Storage Capacity 80 gallons Boiler or Water Heater Condition Fair Supplementary Storage Tanks? No Storage Tank Quantity and Volume None Quantity of Storage Tanks 0 Storage Tank Condition -- Domestic Hot Water Circulation Pumps (3 HP and over) No Adequacy of Hot Water Adequate Adequacy of Water Pressure Adequate Plumbing Fixtures Water Closets Commercial Toilet (Water Closet) Flush Rating 1.6 GPF Common Area Faucet Nominal Flow Rate 2.0 GPM Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Water heaters  Toilets  Urinals  Sinks  Ejector pumps NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 22 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  The plumbing systems appear to be well maintained and functioning adequately. The water pressure appears to be sufficient. No significant repair actions or short term replacement costs are required. Routine and periodic maintenance is recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components or systems listed above will be required. 7.3. Building Gas Distribution Gas service is supplied from the gas main on the adjacent public street. The gas meter and regulator is located along the exterior wall of the building. The gas distribution piping within the building is malleable steel (black iron). Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The pressure and quantity of gas appear to be adequate.  The gas meter and regulator appear to be functioning adequately and will require routine maintenance.  Only limited observation of the gas distribution piping can be made due to hidden conditions. 7.4. Building Electrical Building Electrical Systems Electrical Lines Underground Transformer Pad-mounted Main Service Size 800 Amps Volts 120/208 Volt, three-phase Meter and Panel Location Basement mechanical room Branch Wiring Copper Conduit Metallic Step-Down Transformers? No Security / Surveillance System? No Building Intercom System? No Lighting Fixtures T-12 Main Distribution Condition Fair Secondary Panel and Transformer Condition Fair Lighting Condition Fair Building Emergency System Size 26 kW Fuel Natural gas Generator / UPS Serves Emergency lights, elevators Tank Location NA Testing Frequency Bi-Weekly Tank Type None Generator / UPS Condition Fair NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 23 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Circuit breaker panels  Main switchgear  Interior light fixtures  Emergency generator Actions/Comments:  The onsite electrical systems up to the meters are owned and maintained by the respective utility company.  The electrical service and capacity appear to be adequate for the property’s demands.  The switchgear and some panels are original 1976 components. The electrical service is reportedly adequate for the facility’s needs. However, due to the age of the panels and switchgear and increasing difficulty of obtaining replacement parts over time, lifecycle replacements are recommended per above.  The light fixtures throughout most of the facility utilize older, inefficient T-12 lamps. Replacement with newer fixtures with electronic ballasts and T-8 lamps is highly recommended to save substantial amounts of energy. 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems Building Elevators Manufacturer Dover Machinery Location Ground floor or basement adjacent to shaft Safety Stops Mechanical Emergency Equipment Yes Cab Floor Finish Vinyl-tiled Cab Wall Finish Plastic-laminated wood Hydraulic Elevators 1 car at 2500 lbs Overhead Traction Elevators None Freight Elevators None Machinery Condition Fair Controls Condition Fair Cab Finish Condition Fair Other Conveyances Dumb-waiter (non-functional, not inventoried) Other Conveyance Condition Failed Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Elevator controls  Hydraulic machinery Actions/Comments:  The elevators are serviced by Schindler Elevator Corp on a routine basis. The elevator machinery and controls are the originally installed system. The elevators are utilizing outdated controls and equipment. Full modernization is recommended. A budgetary cost for this work is included.  The elevators are inspected on an annual basis by the municipality, and a certificate of inspection is displayed in the elevator cab. The inspection certificates have expired. It is common for inspections to occur behind schedule. A new inspection should be scheduled as soon as possible.  The emergency communication equipment in the elevator cabs appears to be functional. Equipment testing is not within the scope of the work.  The finishes in the elevator cabs will require replacement. The cost to replace the finishes is relatively insignificant and the work can be performed as part of the property management’s operations program. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 24 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems Item Description Type Wet pipe Fire Alarm System Central Alarm Panel ☒ Battery-Operated Smoke Detectors ☐ Alarm Horns ☒ Annunciator Panels ☒ Hard-Wired Smoke Detectors ☒ Strobe Light Alarms ☒ Pull Stations ☒ Emergency Battery-Pack Lighting ☒ Illuminated EXIT Signs ☒ Alarm System Condition Fair Sprinkler System None ☐ Standpipes ☒ Backflow Preventer ☒ Hose Cabinets ☐ Fire Pumps ☐ Siamese Connections ☐ Suppression Condition Fair Central Alarm Panel System Location of Alarm Panel Installation Date of Alarm Panel Water meter room 2013 Fire Extinguishers Last Service Date Servicing Current? January, 2016 Yes Hydrant Location Adjacent to building Siamese Location None Special Systems Kitchen Suppression System ☐Computer Room Suppression System ☐ Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Central alarm panel  Alarm devices and system Actions/Comments:  Some of the ceiling mounted brackets which hold an area of fire suppression piping in the old storage area were observed to have become detached. The piping is resting on wooden shelving. This condition increases the likelihood of a pipe leak or an inadvertent triggering of the suppression system. This condition must be repaired. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 25 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 8. Interior Spaces 8.1. Interior Finishes The facility is currently vacant. Previously it was used as a bank, and then concurrently as an exercise gym and a massage therapy facility. Planned renovations will result in all 14,000 square feet of the facility being used for municipal offices for the City of Yorkville. The most significant interior spaces include open spaces, offices, and bank vaults. Supporting areas include hallways, stairs, restrooms mechanical rooms, utility closets, and back-of-house areas. The following table generally describes the locations and typical conditions of the interior finishes within the facility: Typical Floor Finishes Floor Finish Locations General Condition Rubber flooring Basement exercise area, small area in upper area Poor Vinyl plank Renovated area of basement Fair Carpet Basement hallways, upper floor vaults and office areas Poor Quarry tile Entry vestibules Fair Ceramic tile Restrooms Fair Concrete Mechanical/utility areas, storage area Fair Typical Wall Finishes Wall Finish Locations General Condition Painted drywall Throughout building Fair Ceramic tile Restrooms Fair Exposed CMU/masonry Mechanical/utility areas, storage area Fair Typical Ceiling Finishes Ceiling Finish Locations General Condition Suspended T-bar (Acoustic) Some areas of basement, upper floor restrooms, stairwells Fair Hard glued tiles Small vault, upper floor Fair Exposed structure Throughout building Fair NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 26 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Interior Doors Item Type Condition Interior Doors Hollow core Solid core Bank vault (solid metal) Fair Door Framing Wood Metal Fair Fire Doors Yes Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Carpet  Vinyl plank  Ceramic tile  Interior paint  Suspended acoustic ceiling tile  Hard tile ceilings  Interior doors Actions/Comments:  The interior areas were last partially renovated around 2012.  The interior finishes have mostly been removed from the facility. Some of the remaining fixtures are in fair condition, however comprehensive renovations are planned for the facility are in order to render it compatible with the planned facility uses. A general cost for this work has been included in the report.  The ceiling tiles have isolated areas of water-damage in several areas, including the basement coat room, the area immediately outside of the main bank vault, and the older section of the facility. The damaged ceiling tiles need to be replaced. This work can be accomplished as part of the planned renovations. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 27 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 9. Other Structures A storage building is located at the northeast corner of the parking area. The maintenance building is a cast-in-place concrete structure set on a concrete slab. The building is integrated into the retaining wall. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Storage shed doors Actions/Comments:  The door weather strip and threshold are deteriorated and damaged. The threshold is splintering and portions of the weather strip are missing. Replacement of these components is recommended. The cost for this work is relatively insignificant and can be accomplished through the City’s routine maintenance program. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 28 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 10. Certification The City of Yorkville retained EMG to perform this Facility Condition Assessment in connection with its continued operation of New City Hall, 102 East Van Emmon Street, Yorkville, Illinois, the “Property”. It is our understanding that the primary interest of the City of Yorkville is to locate and evaluate materials and building system defects that might significantly affect the value of the property and to determine if the present Property has conditions that will have a significant impact on its continued operations. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the brief review of the plans and records made available to our Project Manager during the site visit, interviews of available property management personnel and maintenance contractors familiar with the Property, appropriate inquiry of municipal authorities, our Project Manager’s walk-through observations during the site visit, and our experience with similar properties. No testing, exploratory probing, dismantling or operating of equipment or in depth studies were performed unless specifically required under Section 2 of this report. This assessment did not include engineering calculations to determine the adequacy of the Property’s original design or existing systems. Although walk-through observations were performed, not all areas were observed (See Section 4.2 for areas observed). There may be defects in the Property, which were in areas not observed or readily accessible, may not have been visible, or were not disclosed by management personnel when questioned. The report describes property conditions at the time that the observations and research were conducted. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for the use of the City of Yorkville for the purpose stated within Section 2 of this report. The report, or any excerpt thereof, shall not be used by any party other than the City of Yorkville or for any other purpose than that specifically stated in our agreement or within Section 2 of this report without the express written consent of EMG. Any reuse or distribution of this report without such consent shall be at the City of Yorkville and the recipient’s sole risk, without liability to EMG. Prepared by: Kevin Koranda, Project Manager Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 29 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 11. Appendices Appendix A: Photographic Record Appendix B: Site Plan Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Appendix D: Pre-Survey Questionnaire NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix A: Photographic Record NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #1: EAST ELEVATION PHOTO #2: SOUTH ELEVATION PHOTO #3: EAST ELEVATION PHOTO #4: NORTH ELEVATION PHOTO #5: NORTH ELEVATION PHOTO #6: WEST ELEVATION NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #7: SOUTH ELEVATION PHOTO #8: PARKING AREA PHOTO #9: DAMAGED ASPHALT PHOTO #10: DAAMGED ASPHALT PHOTO #11: HILL ADJACENT PARKING AREA PHOTO #12: SIDEWALK NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #13: SITE LIGHTING PHOTO #14: PARKING AREA RETAINING WALL PHOTO #15: SIDEWALK RETAINING WALL PHOTO #16: PARKING LOT PHOTO #17: SIDEWALK, EAST END OF SITE PHOTO #18: STAIRS, EAST EDGE OF SITE NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #19: STORAGE ROOM PHOTO #20: BUILDING SOFFIT PHOTO #21: STOREFRONT WINDOWS PHOTO #22: MISSING AREA OF WINDOW GASKET PHOTO #23: DAMAGED WINDOW FRAME PHOTO #24: EFFLORESCENCE ON BRICK NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #25: RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURE PHOTO #26: ROOF, WATER STAINING PHOTO #27: ROOF, CLOGGED DRAIN PHOTO #28: ROOF, TPO MEMBRANE PHOTO #29: ROOF, MODIFIED BITUMINOUS MEMBRANE PHOTO #30: PACKAGE UNIT NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #31: EXHAUST FAN PHOTO #32: CONDENSING UNIT PHOTO #33: MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL PHOTO #34: BOILER ROOM PHOTO #35: BOILER PHOTO #36: ELECTRICAL/SUMP PUMP ROOM NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #37: COLD WATER ENTRY PHOTO #38: GENERATOR PHOTO #39: MAIN ENTRY DOORS PHOTO #40: UPPER FLOOR, MAIN SPACE PHOTO #41: UPPER FLOOR, EAST WALL PHOTO #42: ROOF DECK, CORROSION NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #43: OLD BUILDING AREA, UPPER FLOOR PHOTO #44: WATER STAIN ADJACENT TO EAST WALL PHOTO #45: CEILING, OLDER AREA PHOTO #46: BRICK INTERIOR WALL PHOTO #47: STEEL STRUCTURAL BEAM PHOTO #48: WATER DAMAGE NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #49: FIRE ALARM STROBE AND SPRINKLER HEAD PHOTO #50: EXIT SIGN AND EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURE PHOTO #51: ELEVATOR CAB INTERIOR PHOTO #52: WATER DAMAGED CEILING TILE PHOTO #53: UPPER FLOOR BANK VAULT ROOM PHOTO #54: WATER DAMAGED CEILING TILE NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #55: MAIN ENTRY VESTIBULE, QUARRY TILE PHOTO #56: STAIRWELL PHOTO #57: CENTRAL STAIRWELL PHOTO #58: BASEMENT, VACANT AREA PHOTO #59: RENOVATED BASEMENT AREA PHOTO #60: OLD STORAGE ROOM NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #61: DETERIORATING CONCRETE PHOTO #62: DETERIORATING CONCRETE PHOTO #63: DETERIORATING CONCRETE PHOTO #64: SHOWERS PHOTO #65: TOILET STALLS PHOTO #66: SINKS NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix B: Site Plan Site Plan Project Name: New City Hall Project Number: 122700.17R000-001.322 Source: Google Earth Pro On-Site Date: May 16, 2017 NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Page 1 of 4 Date Completed: May 16, 2017 Property Name: New City Hall EMG Project Number: 122700.17R000-001.322 Building History Yes No Unk Comments 1 Has an ADA survey previously been completed for this property? ✓ 2 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? ✓ 3 Does a Transition Plan / Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? ✓ 4 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints that have not been resolved? ✓ 5 Is any litigation pending related to ADA issues? ✓ Parking Yes No NA Comments 1 Are there sufficient accessible parking spaces with respect to the total number of reported spaces? ✓ 1 accessible space, no signage 2 Are there sufficient van-accessible parking spaces available? ✓ None 3 Are accessible spaces marked with the International Symbol of Accessibility? Are there signs reading “Van Accessible” at van spaces? ✓ 4 Is there at least one accessible route provided within the boundary of the site from public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones, if provided, and public streets and sidewalks? ✓ 5 Do curbs on the accessible route have depressed, ramped curb cuts at drives, paths, and drop-offs? ✓ No depression, only a slope 6 If required does signage exist directing you to accessible parking and an accessible building entrance? ✓ Ramps Yes No NA Comments 1* Do all ramps along accessible path of travel appear to meet slope requirements? ( 1:12 or less) ✓ 2 Are ramps that appear longer than 6 ft complete with railings on both sides? ✓ 3 Does the width between railings appear at least 36 inches? ✓ Page 2 of 4 Ramps (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 4 Is there a level landing for approximately every 30 ft horizontal length of ramp, at the top and at the bottom of ramps and switchbacks? ✓ Entrances/Exits Yes No NA Comments 1 Do all required accessible entrance doorways appear at least 32 inches wide and not a revolving door? ✓ 2 If the main entrance is inaccessible, are there alternate accessible entrances? ✓ 3 Is the door hardware easy to operate (lever/push type hardware, no twisting required and not higher than approximately 48 inches above the floor)? ✓ Paths of Travel Yes No NA Comments 1 Are all paths of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair (appear at least 36 inches wide)? ✓ 2 Are wheelchair-accessible facilities (toilet rooms, exits, etc.) identified with signage? ✓ Signs removed from doors 3 Is there a path of travel that does not require the use of stairs? ✓ Elevator Elevators Yes No NA Comments 1 Do the call buttons have visual and audible signals to indicate when a call is registered and answered when car arrives? ✓ 2 Are there visual and audible signals inside cars indicating floor change? ✓ Indicator not functional 3 Are there standard raised and Braille marking on both jambs of each hoist way entrance as well as all cab/call buttons? ✓ 4 Do elevator doors have a reopening device that will stop and reopen a car door if an object or a person obstructs the door? ✓ 5 Are elevator controls low enough to be reached from a wheelchair (appears to be between 15 and 48 inches)? ✓ 6 If a two-way emergency communication system is provided within the elevator cab, is it usable without voice communication? ✓ Page 3 of 4 Toilet Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 Are common area public restrooms located on an accessible route? ✓ Route is clear to one restroom, threshold renders room inaccessible 2 Are pull handles push/pull or lever type? ✓ 3 Are there audible and visual fire alarm devices in the toilet rooms? ✓ 4 Are toilet room access doors wheelchair- accessible (appear to be at least 32 inches wide)? ✓ 5 Are public restrooms large enough to accommodate a wheelchair turnaround (appear to have 60” turning diameter)? ✓ All but one at older area of upper floor 6 In unisex toilet rooms, are there safety alarms with pull cords? ✓ 7 Are toilet stall doors wheelchair accessible (appear to be at least 32” wide)? ✓ 8 Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? ✓ 9 Are sinks provided with clearance for a wheelchair to roll under (appear to have 29” clearance)? ✓ 10 Are sink handles operable with one hand without grasping, pinching or twisting? ✓ 11 Are exposed pipes under sink sufficiently insulated against contact? ✓ Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 How many total accessible sleeping rooms does the property management report to have? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible sleeping rooms with respect to the total number of reported guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. ✓ Page 4 of 4 Guest Rooms (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 2 How many of the accessible sleeping rooms per property management have roll- in showers? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible rooms with roll-in showers with respect to the total number of reported accessible guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. ✓ 3 How many assistive listening kits and/or rooms with communication features are available per property management? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported assistive listening devices with respect to the total number of rooms? See attached hot sheet. ✓ Pools Yes No NA Comments 1 Are public access pools provided? If the answer is no, please disregard this section. ✓ 2 How many accessible access points are provided to each pool/spa? Provide number in comment field. Is at least one fixed lift or sloped entry to the pool provided? ✓ Play Area Yes No NA Comments 1 Has the play area been reviewed for accessibility? All public playgrounds are subject to ADAAG standards. ✓ Exercise Equipment Yes No NA Comments 1 Does there appear to be adequate clear floor space around the machines/equipment (30” by 48” minimum)? ✓ *Based on visual observation only. The slope was not confirmed through measurements. NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix D: Pre-Survey Questionnaire NEW CITY HALL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-001.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 On the day of the site visit, provide EMG's Field Observer access to all of the available documents listed below. Provide copies if possible. INFORMATION REQUIRED 1. All available construction documents (blueprints) for the original construction of the building or for any tenant improvement work or other recent construction work. 2. A site plan, preferably 8 1/2" X 11", which depicts the arrangement of buildings, roads, parking stalls, and other site features. 3. For commercial properties, provide a tenant list which identifies the names of each tenant, vacant tenant units, the floor area of each tenant space, and the gross and net leasable area of the building(s). 4. For apartment properties, provide a summary of the apartment unit types and apartment unit type quantities, including the floor area of each apartment unit as measured in square feet. 5. For hotel or nursing home properties, provide a summary of the room types and room type quantities. 6. Copies of Certificates of Occupancy, building permits, fire or health department inspection reports, elevator inspection certificates, roof or HVAC warranties, or any other similar, relevant documents. 7. The names of the local utility companies which serve the property, including the water, sewer, electric, gas, and phone companies. 8. The company name, phone number, and contact person of all outside vendors who serve the property, such as mechanical contractors, roof contractors, fire sprinkler or fire extinguisher testing contractors, and elevator contractors. 9. A summary of recent (over the last 5 years) capital improvement work which describes the scope of the work and the estimated cost of the improvements. Executed contracts or proposals for improvements. Historical costs for repairs, improvements, and replacements. 10. Records of system and material ages (roof, MEP, paving, finishes, furnishings). 11. Any brochures or marketing information. 12. Appraisal, either current or previously prepared. 13. Current occupancy percentage and typical turnover rate records (for commercial and apartment properties). 14. Previous reports pertaining to the physical condition of property. 15. ADA survey and status of improvements implemented. 16. Current / pending litigation related to property condition. Your timely compliance with this request is greatly appreciated. EMG Corporate Headquarters 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100, Owings Mills, MD 21117 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Prepared for: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT Public Library 902 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 PREPARED BY: EMG CONTACT: EMG Andrew Hupp 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Senior Engineering Consultant Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 800.733.0660 x6632 800.733.0660 arhupp@emgcorp.com www.EMGcorp.com EMG Project Number: Date of Report: On Site Date: 122700.17R000-008.322 June 14, 2017 May 24, 2017 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition ................................................................ 1 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations ...................................................................... 3 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Scope .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Personnel Interviewed ................................................................................................................. 6 2.4. Documentation Reviewed ........................................................................................................... 7 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire ........................................................................................................... 7 2.6. Weather Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 7 3. Accessibility and Property Research ................................................................................................. 8 3.1. ADA Accessibility ........................................................................................................................ 8 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone ................................................................ 8 4. Existing Building Assessment ............................................................................................................ 9 4.1. Unit or Space Types .................................................................................................................... 9 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed ...................................................................... 9 5. Site Improvements ............................................................................................................................. 10 5.1. Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 10 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks ................................................................................................ 10 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control .................................................................................... 11 5.4. Topography and Landscaping ................................................................................................... 12 5.5. General Site Improvements ....................................................................................................... 12 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems ............................................................................... 14 6.1. Foundations ............................................................................................................................... 14 6.2. Superstructure ........................................................................................................................... 14 6.3. Roofing ...................................................................................................................................... 14 6.4. Exterior Walls ............................................................................................................................ 16 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs ......................................................................................................... 16 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors ..................................................................................................... 16 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony ...................................................................................................... 17 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems .................................................................................. 18 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) ..................................................... 18 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water ............................................................................. 20 7.3. Building Gas Distribution ........................................................................................................... 21 7.4. Building Electrical ...................................................................................................................... 22 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems .............................................................................. 22 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems ....................................................................................... 23 7.7. Life Support Systems ................................................................................................................ 24 8. Interior Spaces .................................................................................................................................... 25 8.1. Interior Finishes ......................................................................................................................... 25 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment .............................................................................. 26 9. Other Structures ................................................................................................................................. 27 10. Certification ......................................................................................................................................... 28 11. Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 29 PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 1 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition The property information is summarized in the table below. More detailed descriptions may be found in the various sections of the report and in the Appendices. Property Information Address: 902 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Kendall, IL 60560 Year Constructed/Renovated: 1983 Current Occupants: City of Yorkville – Public Library Percent Utilization: 100% Management Point of Contact: City of Yorkville, Mr. Peter Ratos 630.553.8574 phone pratos@yorkville.il.us email Property Type: Library Site Area: 2.29 acres Building Area: 40,000 SF Number of Buildings: 1 Number of Stories: 2 Parking Type and Number of Spaces: 59 spaces in open lots Building Construction: Steel frame with concrete-topped metal decks Roof Construction: Sloped roofs with metal finish Flat roof with EPDM membrane Exterior Finishes: Stone, brick veneer, siding. Heating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning: Central system with boilers, chillers, and air handlers feeding VAV and hydronic baseboard and ceiling radiators. Supplemental components: computer room air conditioning unit, cabinet unit heaters, and suspended unit heaters. Fire and Life/Safety: Fire sprinklers, hydrants, smoke detectors, alarms, strobes, extinguishers, pull stations, alarm panel, exit signs, and emergency lighting. Dates of Visit: May 24, 2017 On-Site Point of Contact (POC): Scott Sleezer Assessment and Report Prepared by: Paul Prusa Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6623 Systemic Condition Summary Site Good HVAC Fair PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 2 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Systemic Condition Summary Structure Good Plumbing Fair Roof Good Electrical Good Vertical Envelope Good Elevators Fair Interiors Fair Fire Fair The following bullet points highlight the most significant short term and modernization recommendations:  No significant short term of modernization recommendations were observed. Generally, the property appears to have been constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained since it was first occupied and is in good overall condition. The property has had no major capital improvements. The property is less than 10 years old and has not required any major capital improvements. 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate the FCI, which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. Two FCI ratios are calculated and presented, the Current Year and Ten-Year. The Current Year FCI is the ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to the building’s Current Replacement Value. Similarly, the Ten-Year FCI is the ratio of anticipated Capital Reserve Needs over the next ten years to the Current Replacement Value. Fci Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value Good In new or well-maintained condition, with no visual evidence of wear, soiling or other deficiencies. 0% to 5% Fair Subjected to wear and soiling but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. > than 5% to 10% PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 3 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Fci Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value Poor Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. > than 10% to 60% Very Poor Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal is now necessary. > than 60% The graphs above and tables below represent summary-level findings for the FCA. The deficiencies identified in this assessment can be combined with potential new construction requirements to develop an overall strategy that can serve as the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy. Key findings from the assessment include: Key Finding Metric Current Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (IR)/(CRV) 0.0% Good 10-Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (RR)/(CRV) 27.8% Poor Current Replacement Value (CRV) 40,000 SF * 183.24 / SF = $7,329,485 Year 0 (Current Year) - Immediate Repairs (IR) $1,543 Years 1-10 – Replacement Reserves (RR) $2,042,965 Total Capital Needs $2,044,508 The major issues contributing to the Immediate Repair Costs and the Current Year FCI ratio are summarized below:  No significant immediate repair costs were observed. Further detail on the specific costs that make up the Immediate Repair Costs can be found in the cost tables at the beginning of this report. 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations As part of the FCA, a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) was performed to determine the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. Property personnel were interviewed concerning any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Sampling is not a part of this assessment. There are no visual indications of the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, or evidence of moisture in representative readily accessible areas of the property. 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost Cost estimates are attached at the front of this report (following the cover page). These estimates are based on Invoice or Bid Document/s provided either by the Owner/facility and construction costs developed by construction resources such as R.S. Means and Marshall & Swift, EMG’s experience with past costs for similar properties, city cost indexes, and assumptions regarding future economic conditions. Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary, order of magnitude budgets. Actual costs most probably will vary from the consultant’s opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy, quality of materials and installation, manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected, field conditions, whether a physical deficiency is repaired or replaced in whole, phasing of the work (if applicable), quality of contractor, quality of project management exercised, market conditions, and whether competitive pricing is solicited, etc. ASTM E2018-08 recognizes that certain opinions of probable costs cannot be developed within the scope of this guide without further study. Opinions of probable cost for further study should be included in the FCA. PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 4 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1.4.1. Methodology Based upon site observations, research, and judgment, along with referencing Expected Useful Life (EUL) tables from various industry sources, EMG opines as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement. Accurate historical replacement records, if provided, are typically the best source of information. Exposure to the elements, initial quality and installation, extent of use, the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised, etc., are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component. As a result, a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual chronological age. The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age. Projections of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) are based on continued use of the Property similar to the reported past use. Significant changes in occupants and/or usage may affect the service life of some systems or components. Where quantities could not be derived from an actual take-off, lump sum costs or allowances are used. Estimated costs are based on professional judgment and the probable or actual extent of the observed defect, inclusive of the cost to design, procure, construct and manage the corrections. 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs Immediate repairs are opinions of probable costs that require immediate action as a result of: (1) material existing or potential unsafe conditions, (2) material building or fire code violations, or (3) conditions that, if not addressed, have the potential to result in, or contribute to, critical element or system failure within one year or will most probably result in a significant escalation of its remedial cost. 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves Replacement Reserves are for recurring probable expenditures, which are not classified as operation or maintenance expenses. The replacement reserves should be budgeted for in advance on an annual basis. Replacement Reserves are reasonably predictable both in terms of frequency and cost. However, Replacement Reserves may also include components or systems that have an indeterminable life but, nonetheless, have a potential for failure within an estimated time period. Replacement Reserves exclude systems or components that are estimated to expire after the reserve term and are not considered material to the structural and mechanical integrity of the subject property. Furthermore, systems and components that are not deemed to have a material effect on the use of the Property are also excluded. Costs that are caused by acts of God, accidents, or other occurrences that are typically covered by insurance, rather than reserved for, are also excluded. Replacement costs are solicited from ownership/property management, EMG’s discussions with service companies, manufacturers' representatives, and previous experience in preparing such schedules for other similar facilities. Costs for work performed by the ownership’s or property management’s maintenance staff are also considered. EMG’s reserve methodology involves identification and quantification of those systems or components requiring capital reserve funds within the assessment period. The assessment period is defined as the effective age plus the reserve term. Additional information concerning system’s or component’s respective replacement costs (in today's dollars), typical expected useful lives, and remaining useful lives were estimated so that a funding schedule could be prepared. The Replacement Reserves Schedule presupposes that all required remedial work has been performed or that monies for remediation have been budgeted for items defined in the Immediate Repair Cost Estimate. PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 5 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2. Purpose and Scope 2.1. Purpose EMG was retained by the client to render an opinion as to the Property’s current general physical condition on the day of the site visit. Based on the observations, interviews and document review outlined below, this report identifies significant deferred maintenance issues, existing deficiencies, and material code violations of record at municipal offices, which affect the Property’s use. Opinions are rendered as to its structural integrity, building system condition and the Property’s overall condition. The report also notes building systems or components that have realized or exceeded their typical expected useful lives. CONDITIONS: The physical condition of building systems and related components are typically defined as being in one of five conditions: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Failed or a combination thereof. For the purposes of this report, the following definitions are used: Excellent = New or very close to new; component or system typically has been installed within the past year, sound and performing its function. Eventual repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Good = Satisfactory as-is. Component or system is sound and performing its function, typically within the first third of its lifecycle. However, it may show minor signs of normal wear and tear. Repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Fair = Showing signs of wear and use but still satisfactory as-is, typically near the median of its estimated useful life. Component or system is performing adequately at this time but may exhibit some signs of wear, deferred maintenance, or evidence of previous repairs. Repair or replacement will be required due to the component or system’s condition and/or its estimated remaining useful life. Poor = Component or system is significantly aged, flawed, functioning intermittently or unreliably; displays obvious signs of deferred maintenance; shows evidence of previous repair or workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards; has become obsolete; or exhibits an inherent deficiency. The present condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of contiguous elements or systems. Either full component replacement is needed or repairs are required to restore to good condition, prevent premature failure, and/or prolong useful life. Failed = Component or system has ceased functioning or performing as intended. Replacement, repair, or other significant corrective action is recommended or required. Not Applicable = Assigning a condition does not apply or make logical sense, most commonly due to the item in question not being present. FORMAT OF THE BODY OF THE REPORT: Throughout sections 5 through 9 of this report, each report section will typically contain three subsections organized in the following sequence:  A descriptive table (and/or narrative), which identifies the components assessed, their condition, and other key data points.  A simple bulleted list of Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements, which lists components and assets typically in Excellent, Good, or Fair condition at the time of the assessment but that will require replacement or some other attention once aged past their estimated useful life. These listed components are typically included in the associated inventory database with costs identified and budgeted beyond the first several years.  A bulleted cluster of Actions/Comments, which include more detailed narratives describing deficiencies, recommended repairs, and short term replacements. The assets and components associated with these bullets are/were typically problematic and in Poor or Failed condition at the time of the assessment, with corresponding costs included within the first few years. PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 6 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PLAN TYPES: Each line item in the cost database is assigned a Plan Type, which is the primary reason or rationale for the recommended replacement, repair, or other corrective action. This is the “why” part of the equation. A cost or line item may commonly have more than one applicable Plan Type; however, only one Plan Type will be assigned based on the “best” fit, typically the one with the greatest significance. The following Plan Types are listed in general weighted order of importance: Safety = An observed or reported unsafe condition that if left unaddressed could result in an injury; a system or component that presents a potential liability risk. Performance/Integrity = Component or system has failed, is almost failing, performs unreliably, does not perform as intended, and/or poses a risk to overall system stability. Accessibility = Does not meet ADA, UFAS, and/or other handicap accessibility requirements. Environmental = Improvements to air or water quality, including removal of hazardous materials from the building or site. Modernization/Adaptation = Conditions, systems, or spaces that need to be upgraded in appearance or function to meet current standards, facility usage, or client/occupant needs. Lifecycle/Renewal = Any component or system in which future repair or replacement is anticipated beyond the next several years and/or is of minimal substantial early-term consequence. 2.2. Scope The standard scope of the Facility Condition Assessment includes the following:  Visit the Property to evaluate the general condition of the building and site improvements, review available construction documents in order to familiarize ourselves with, and be able to comment on, the in-place construction systems, life safety, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and the general built environment.  Identify those components that are exhibiting deferred maintenance issues and provide cost estimates for Immediate Costs and Replacement Reserves based on observed conditions, maintenance history and industry standard useful life estimates. This will include the review of documented capital improvements completed within the last five-year period and work currently contracted for, if applicable.  Provide a full description of the Property with descriptions of in-place systems and commentary on observed conditions.  Provide a general statement of the subject Property’s compliance to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This will not constitute a full ADA survey, but will help identify exposure to issues and the need for further review.  Perform a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) for the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. EMG will also interview Project personnel regarding the presence of any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Potentially affected areas will be photographed. Sampling will not be considered in routine assessments.  List the current utility service providers.  Review maintenance records and procedures with the in-place maintenance personnel.  Observe a representative sample of the interior spaces/units, including vacant spaces/units, in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas to be observed include the exterior of the property, the roofs, interior common areas, and the significant mechanical, electrical and elevator equipment rooms.  Provide recommendations for additional studies, if required, with related budgetary information.  Provide an Executive Summary at the beginning of this report.  Prepare a mechanical equipment inventory list. 2.3. Personnel Interviewed The building engineer were interviewed for specific information relating to the physical property, available maintenance procedures, historical performance of key building systems and components, available drawings and other documentation. The following personnel from the facility and government agencies were interviewed in the process of conducting the FCA: Name and Title Organization Phone Number Scott Sleezer City of Yorkville – Parks and Recreation 630.878.7291 The FCA was performed without the assistance of an onsite Point of Contact (POC). PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 7 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2.4. Documentation Reviewed Prior to the FCA, relevant documentation was requested that could aid in the knowledge of the subject property’s physical improvements, extent and type of use, and/or assist in identifying material discrepancies between reported information and observed conditions. The review of submitted documents does not include comment on the accuracy of such documents or their preparation, methodology, or protocol. The Documentation Request Form is provided in Appendix E. Although Appendix E provides a summary of the documents requested or obtained, the following list provides more specific details about some of the documents that were reviewed or obtained during the site visit.  No documents were provided. 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire A Pre-Survey Questionnaire was sent to the POC prior to the site visit and was not returned. The questionnaire is included in Appendix E. 2.6. Weather Conditions May 24, 2017: Cloudy, with temperatures in the 80s (°F) and light winds. PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 8 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 3. Accessibility and Property Research 3.1. ADA Accessibility Generally, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by entities to access and use of “areas of public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” on the basis of disability. Regardless of its age, these areas and facilities must be maintained and operated to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). Buildings completed and occupied after January 26, 1992 are required to comply fully with the ADAAG. Existing facilities constructed prior to this date are held to the lesser standard of compliance to the extent allowed by structural feasibility and the financial resources available. As an alternative, a reasonable accommodation pertaining to the deficiency must be made. During the FCA, a limited visual observation for ADA accessibility compliance was conducted. The scope of the visual observation was limited to those areas set forth in EMG’s Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist provided in Appendix D of this report. It is understood by the Client that the limited observations described herein does not comprise a full ADA Compliance Survey, and that such a survey is beyond the scope of EMG’s undertaking. Only a representative sample of areas was observed and, other than as shown on the Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist, actual measurements were not taken to verify compliance. At a office property, the areas considered as a public accommodation besides the site itself and parking, are the exterior accessible route, the interior accessible route up to the tenant lease lines and the interior common areas, including the common area restrooms. The facility does not appear to be accessible with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Elements as defined by the ADAAG that are not accessible as stated within the priorities of Title III, are as follows: Parking  Adequate number of designated parking stalls and signage for vans are not provided. Restrooms  Wrap drain pipes below lavatory with insulation; protect against contact with hot, sharp, or abrasive surfaces. Original library area only. A full ADA Compliance Survey may reveal additional aspects of the property that are not in compliance. Corrections of these conditions should be addressed from a liability standpoint, but are not necessarily code violations. The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines concern civil rights issues as they pertain to the disabled and are not a construction code, although many local jurisdictions have adopted the Guidelines as such. The cost to address the achievable items noted above is included in the cost tables. 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone Not applicable. PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 9 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 4. Existing Building Assessment 4.1. Unit or Space Types All 40,000 square feet of the building are occupied by a single occupant, City of Yorkville Public Library. The spaces are a combination of offices, reading rooms, library, meeting rooms, supporting restrooms, mechanical, and other utility spaces. 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed The interior spaces were observed in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas accessed included the site within the property boundaries, exterior of the property and the roof. All areas of the property were available for observation during the site visit. PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 10 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 5. Site Improvements 5.1. Utilities The following table identifies the utility suppliers and the condition and adequacy of the services. Site Utilities Utility Supplier Condition and Adequacy Sanitary sewer City of Yorkville Good Storm sewer City of Yorkville Good Domestic water City of Yorkville Good Electric service Commonwealth Edison Good Natural gas service Nicor Gas Good Actions/Comments:  According to the POC, the utilities provided are adequate for the property. There are no unique, onsite utility systems such as emergency electrical generators, septic systems, water or waste water treatment plants, or propane gas tanks. 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks Item Description Main Ingress and Egress Game Farm Road Access from West Additional Entrances -- Additional Access from -- Paving and Flatwork Item Material Last Work Done Condition Entrance Driveway Apron Asphalt 2006 Fair Parking Lot Asphalt 2006 Fair Drive Aisles Asphalt 2006 Fair Service Aisles None -- -- Sidewalks Concrete 2006 Good Curbs Concrete 2006 Good Site Stairs Cast-in-place concrete 2006 Good Pedestrian Ramps None -- -- PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 11 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Parking Count Open Lot Carport Private Garage Subterranean Garage Freestanding Parking Structure 59 0 0 0 0 Total Number of ADA Compliant Spaces 6 Number of ADA Compliant Spaces for Vans 0 Total Parking Spaces 59 Parking Ratio (Spaces/Apartments) -- Method of Obtaining Parking Count Physical count Exterior Stairs Location Material Handrails Condition Right side of building Concrete stairs Metal Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Asphalt seal coating  Asphalt pavement Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control Drainage System and Erosion Control System Exists At Site Condition Surface Flow ☐ -- Inlets ☒ Good Swales ☐ -- Detention pond ☐ -- Lagoons ☐ -- Ponds ☐ -- Underground Piping ☒ Good Pits ☐ -- Municipal System ☒ Good Dry Well ☐ -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 12 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  There is no evidence of storm water runoff from adjacent properties. The storm water system appears to provide adequate runoff capacity. There is no evidence of major ponding or erosion. 5.4. Topography and Landscaping Item Description Site Topography Generally flat Landscaping Trees Grass Flower Beds Planters Drought Tolerant Plants Decorative Stone None ☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☒ ☒ ☐ Landscaping Condition Good Irrigation Automatic Underground Drip Hand Watering None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Irrigation Condition -- Retaining Walls Type Location Condition Concrete East end of site separating parking lot of adjacent building Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The topography and adjacent uses do not appear to present conditions detrimental to the property. There are no significant areas of erosion. 5.5. General Site Improvements Property Signage Property Signage Monument Street Address Displayed? Yes Site and Building Lighting Site Lighting None Pole Mounted Bollard Lights Ground Mounted Parking Lot Pole Type ☐ ☒ ☒ ☐ ☒ Fair PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 13 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Site and Building Lighting Building Lighting None Wall Mounted Recessed Soffit ☐ ☒ ☒ Fair Site Fencing Type Location Condition Wrought iron Multiple locations Good REFUSE DISPOSAL Refuse Disposal Common area dumpsters Dumpster Locations Mounting Enclosure Contracted? Condition East side of property Concrete pad Wood board fence Yes Good Other Site Amenities Description Location Condition Playground Equipment None -- -- Tennis Courts None -- -- Basketball Court None -- -- Swimming Pool None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Exterior lighting  Site fencing  Benches Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 14 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems 6.1. Foundations Building Foundation Item Description Condition Foundation Concrete spread footings Good Basement and Crawl Space None -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The foundation systems are concealed. There are no significant signs of settlement, deflection, or movement. 6.2. Superstructure Building Superstructure Item Description Condition Framing / Load-Bearing Walls Steel columns and beams Good Ground Floor Concrete slab Good Upper Floor Framing Steel beams Good Upper Floor Decking Metal decking with concrete topping Good Roof Framing Steel beams or girders Good Roof Decking Metal decking Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The superstructure is exposed in some locations, which allows for limited observation. Walls and floors appear to be plumb, level, and stable. There are no significant signs of deflection or movement. 6.3. Roofing Primary Roof Type / Geometry Sloped Finish Metal Maintenance Outside Contractor Roof Age 10 Years Flashing Sheet metal Warranties Yes PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 15 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Primary Roof Parapet Copings None Roof Drains Gutters and downspouts Fascia Metal Panel Insulation Rigid Board Soffits Concealed Soffits Skylights No Attics None Ponding No Ventilation Source-1 Turtle Vents Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 Soffit Vents Roof Condition Good The primary roof is located throughout the majority of the building. Secondary Roof Type / Geometry Flat Finish EPDM Membrane Maintenance Outside Contractor Roof Age 10 Years Flashing Built-up base and Edge flashing Warranties Yes Parapet Copings Pre-cast Concrete and Sheet Metal Roof Drains Internal drains Fascia None Insulation Rigid Board Soffits None Skylights No Attics None Ponding Yes Ventilation Source-1 Parapet and Wall Vent Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 -- Roof Condition Fair The secondary roof is located at the center portion of the building, second story. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  EPDM roof membrane  Roof flashings (included as part of overall membrane replacement)  Parapet wall copings (included as part of overall membrane replacement) Actions/Comments:  The roof finishes were reportedly installed in 2006. Information regarding roof warranties or bonds was not available but given the age it is assumed a warranty is still active. The roofs are maintained by an outside contractor.  According to the POC, there are no active roof leaks. There is no evidence of active roof leaks.  There is no evidence of roof deck or insulation deterioration. The roof substrate and insulation should be inspected during any future roof repair or replacement work.  Roof drainage appears to be adequate. However, debris build-up has caused ponding issues around the flat roof drains. Clearing and minor repair of drain system components should be performed regularly as part of the property management’s routine maintenance and operations program. PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 16 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6.4. Exterior Walls Building Exterior Walls Type Location Condition Primary Finish Cement board siding Good Secondary Finish Brick veneer Good Accented with Stone veneer Good Soffits Concealed Good Building sealants (caulking) are located between dissimilar materials, at joints, and around window and door openings. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Exterior painting Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance, including patching repairs, graffiti removal, and re-caulking, is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs Building Exterior and Interior Stairs Type Description Riser Handrail Balusters Condition Building Exterior Stairs Concrete stairs Closed Metal Metal Good Building Interior Stairs Steel framed with pan-filled concrete Closed Metal Metal Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors Building Windows Window Framing Glazing Location Window Screen Condition Curtain wall Double glaze Exterior walls ☐ Good Aluminum framed storefront Double glaze Front elevation ☐ Good Aluminum framed, fixed Double glaze Exterior walls ☐ Good PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 17 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Building Doors Main Entrance Doors Door Type Condition Fully glazed, metal framed Good Secondary Entrance Doors Fully glazed, metal framed Good Service Doors Metal, insulated Fair Overhead Doors None -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Windows  Curtain wall glazing  Storefront glazing  Exterior doors Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony Not applicable. There are no patios, terraces, or balconies. PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 18 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Individual Units (Original Library 1983) Primary Components Split system furnaces and condensing units Cooling (if separate from above) performed via components above Quantity and Capacity Ranges 2 units at 5 tons each Total Heating or Cooling Capacity 10 tons Heating Fuel Natural gas Location of Equipment Utility closets Space Served by System Original library wing (1983) Age Ranges Vary from 2002 to 2010 Primary Component Condition Fair Building Central Heating System Primary Heating System Type Hot water boilers Quantity and Capacity of Major Components 2 boilers at 1,999 MBH each Total Heating Capacity 3,998 MBH Heating Fuel Natural gas Location of Major Equipment Mechanical rooms Space Served by System Newer wing Age Ranges All units dated 2006 Boiler Condition Fair Heat Exchanger Condition -- Building Central Cooling System Primary Cooling System Type Air-cooled chillers Quantity and Capacity of Major Components 1 chillers at 170 tons Total Cooling Capacity 170 tons Refrigerant R-134A Cooling Towers None Location of Major Equipment Building exterior Space Served by System Newer wing Age Ranges Unit dated 2006 PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 19 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Building Central Cooling System Chiller Condition Fair Cooling Tower Condition -- Distribution System HVAC Water Distribution System Four-pipe Heating Water Circulation Pump Size & Quantity 2 pumps at 5.0 HP each – primary pumps 2 pumps at 7.5 HP each – secondary pumps Chilled Water Circulation Pump Size & Quantity 1 pump at 15 HP Condenser Water Circulation Pump Size & Quantity -- Pump Condition Fair Air Distribution System Variable volume Quantity and Capacity of Air Handlers 1 air handler at 32,025 CFM Location of Air Handlers Mechanical rooms Large Spaces the Larger Dedicated AHU’s Serve -- Age of Air Handlers Unit dated 2006 Air Handler Condition Fair Terminal Units VAV boxes Quantity and Capacity of Terminal Units Approximately 32 VAV boxes assumed to an average size of 1,000 cfm. Location of Terminal Units Above ceilings Spaces Served by Terminal Units Throughout facility Terminal Unit Condition Fair Supplemental Components Supplemental Component #1 Dedicated computer room air conditioners Location / Space Served by Computer Room Air Conditioners Telecom Computer Room Air Conditioners Condition Fair Supplemental Component #2 Radiant ceiling panel Location / Space Served by Radiant Ceiling Panel Building Perimeter Radiant Ceiling Panel Condition Fair Supplemental Component #3 Suspended and cabinet unit heaters Location / Space Served by Unit Heater Mechanical rooms and stairwells Unit Heater Condition Fair PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 20 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Controls and Ventilation HVAC Control System BAS, direct digital controls (DDC) HVAC Control System Condition Fair Building Ventilation Roof top exhaust fans Ventilation System Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Boilers  Chillers  Air handling unit  Distribution pumps and motors  VAV boxes  Split system furnaces and condensing units  Electric wall heaters  Suspended hydronic unit heaters  Cabinet unit heaters  Baseboard heaters  Radiant ceiling panels  Rooftop exhaust fans  Humidifier Actions/Comments:  The HVAC systems are maintained by the in-house maintenance staff. Records of the installation, maintenance, upgrades, and replacement of the HVAC equipment at the property have been maintained since the property was first occupied.  The HVAC equipment appears to vary in age with approximately 90% of the equipment being installed with the 2006 addition. The property is relatively new and has not required any major HVAC equipment replacements.  The HVAC equipment appears to be functioning adequately overall. The building occupants were interviewed about the historical and recent performance of the equipment and systems. No chronic problems were reported and an overall sense of satisfaction with the systems was conveyed. However, due to the inevitable failure of parts and components over time, some of the equipment will require replacement. A budgetary cost for this work is included. 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water Building Plumbing System Type Description Condition Water Supply Piping Copper Good Waste/Sewer Piping Cast iron Good Vent Piping Cast iron Good Water Meter Location Mechanical room Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Components Water Heaters Fuel Natural gas Quantity and Input Capacity 1 unit at 125,000 BTUH PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 21 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Storage Capacity 60 gallons Boiler or Water Heater Condition Fair Supplementary Storage Tanks? No Storage Tank Quantity & Volume -- Quantity of Storage Tanks -- Storage Tank Condition -- Domestic Hot Water Circulation Pumps (3 HP and over) No Adequacy of Hot Water Adequate Adequacy of Water Pressure Adequate Plumbing Fixtures Water Closets Commercial Toilet (Water Closet) Flush Rating 1.6 GPF Common Area Faucet Nominal Flow Rate 2.0 GPM Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Water heater  Toilets  Urinals  Sinks  lavatories Actions/Comments:  The plumbing systems appear to be well maintained and functioning adequately. The water pressure appears to be sufficient. No significant repair actions or short term replacement costs are required. Routine and periodic maintenance is recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components or systems listed above will be required. 7.3. Building Gas Distribution Gas service is supplied from the gas main on the adjacent public street. The gas meter and regulator are located along the exterior walls of the building. The gas distribution piping within the building is malleable steel (black iron). Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The pressure and quantity of gas appear to be adequate.  The gas meter and regulator appear to be functioning adequately and will require routine maintenance.  Only limited observation of the gas distribution piping can be made due to hidden conditions. PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 22 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7.4. Building Electrical Building Electrical Systems Electrical Lines Underground Transformer Pad-mounted Main Service Size 1,200 Amps Volts 277/480 Volt, three-phase Meter & Panel Location Electrical Room Branch Wiring Copper Conduit Metallic Step-Down Transformers? Yes Security / Surveillance System? Yes Building Intercom System? No Lighting Fixtures T-8 Main Distribution Condition Good Secondary Panel and Transformer Condition Good Lighting Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Circuit breaker panels  Main switchboard  Step-down transformer  Interior light fixtures Actions/Comments:  The onsite electrical systems up to the meters are owned and maintained by the respective utility company.  The electrical service and capacity appear to be adequate for the property’s demands.  The panels, switchboard, step-down transformer are mostly original 2006 components, however, the original library has 1983 components. The electrical service is reportedly adequate for the facility’s needs. However, due to the age of the panels, switchboard, and step-down transformers and increasing difficulty of obtaining replacement parts over time, lifecycle replacements are recommended per above. 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems Building Elevators Manufacturer ThyssenKrupp Machinery Location Ground floor or basement adjacent to shaft Safety Stops Electronic Emergency Equipment Yes Cab Floor Finish Carpet Cab Wall Finish Plastic-laminated wood Hydraulic Elevators 1 car at 2,500 LB Overhead Traction Elevators None Freight Elevators None Machinery Condition Good Controls Condition Fair Cab Finish Condition Fair Other Conveyances None PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 23 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Building Elevators Other Conveyance Condition -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Elevator controls  Hydraulic machinery  Elevator cab finishes Actions/Comments:  The elevators appear to provide adequate service. The elevators are serviced by an outside contractor on a routine basis. The elevator machinery and controls are the originally installed system. The elevators will require continued periodic maintenance.  The elevators are inspected on an annual basis by the municipality, and a certificate of inspection is displayed in each elevator cab.  The emergency communication equipment in the elevator cabs appears to be functional. Equipment testing is not within the scope of the work.  The finishes in the elevator cabs will require replacement. The cost to replace the finishes is relatively insignificant and the work can be performed as part of the property management’s operations program. 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems Item Description Type Wet pipe Fire Alarm System Central Alarm Panel ☒ Battery-Operated Smoke Detectors ☐ Alarm Horns ☒ Annunciator Panels ☒ Hard-Wired Smoke Detectors ☒ Strobe Light Alarms ☒ Pull Stations ☒ Emergency Battery-Pack Lighting ☒ Illuminated EXIT Signs ☒ Alarm System Condition Fair Sprinkler System None ☐ Standpipes ☒ Backflow Preventer ☒ Hose Cabinets ☐ Fire Pumps ☐ Siamese Connections ☐ Suppression Condition Fair Central Alarm Panel System Location of Alarm Panel Installation Date of Alarm Panel Entry vestibule 2006 Fire Extinguishers Last Service Date Servicing Current? April 2017 Yes Hydrant Location Front elevation Siamese Location -- Special Systems Kitchen Suppression System ☐Computer Room Suppression System ☐ PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 24 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Central alarm panel  Alarm devices and system  Sprinkler heads Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 7.7. Life Support Systems Not applicable. PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 25 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 8. Interior Spaces 8.1. Interior Finishes The facility is used as a library for the City of Yorkville. The most significant interior spaces include library, offices, meeting room, and main entrance lobby. Supporting areas include hallways, stairs, restrooms, employee break rooms, mechanical rooms, utility closets, back-of-house areas. The following table generally describes the locations and typical conditions of the interior finishes within the facility: Typical Floor Finishes Floor Finish Locations General Condition Carpet Library, offices, meeting rooms, breakroom Fair Vinyl tile Utility closets Fair Ceramic tile Lobby, restrooms Good Wood strip Lounge, breakroom Good Unfinished Mechanical rooms Good Typical Wall Finishes Wall Finish Locations General Condition Painted drywall Throughout building Fair Ceramic tile Restrooms Good Wallpaper Lobby Fair Typical Ceiling Finishes Ceiling Finish Locations General Condition Suspended T-bar (Acoustic) Offices, library, lounges Fair Painted drywall Meeting room, library, restrooms, lobby Fair Exposed structure Library, mechanical rooms Good Interior Doors Item Type Condition Interior Doors Solid core wood Fair Door Framing Metal Fair Fire Doors Yes Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Carpet  Vinyl tile PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 26 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660  Ceramic tile  Wood strip flooring  Interior paint  Wallpaper  Suspended acoustic ceiling tile  Interior doors  Kitchenette appliances Actions/Comments:  The interior areas were last renovated in 2006.  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment Not applicable. PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 27 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 9. Other Structures Not applicable. There are no major accessory structures. PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 28 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 10. Certification City of Yorkville retained EMG to perform this Facility Condition Assessment in connection with its continued operation of Public Library, 902 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, the “Property”. It is our understanding that the primary interest of City of Yorkville is to locate and evaluate materials and building system defects that might significantly affect the value of the property and to determine if the present Property has conditions that will have a significant impact on its continued operations. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the brief review of the plans and records made available to our Project Manager during the site visit, interviews of available property management personnel and maintenance contractors familiar with the Property, appropriate inquiry of municipal authorities, our Project Manager’s walk-through observations during the site visit, and our experience with similar properties. No testing, exploratory probing, dismantling or operating of equipment or in depth studies were performed unless specifically required under Section 2 of this report. This assessment did not include engineering calculations to determine the adequacy of the Property’s original design or existing systems. Although walk-through observations were performed, not all areas were observed (See Section 4.2 for areas observed). There may be defects in the Property, which were in areas not observed or readily accessible, may not have been visible, or were not disclosed by management personnel when questioned. The report describes property conditions at the time that the observations and research were conducted. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for the use of City of Yorkville for the purpose stated within Section 2 of this report. The report, or any excerpt thereof, shall not be used by any party other than City of Yorkville or for any other purpose than that specifically stated in our agreement or within Section 2 of this report without the express written consent of EMG. Any reuse or distribution of this report without such consent shall be at City of Yorkville and the recipient’s sole risk, without liability to EMG. Prepared by: Paul Prusa P.E., LEED AP, Project Manager Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6623 PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 29 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 11. Appendices Appendix A: Photographic Record Appendix B: Site Plan Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix A: Photographic Record PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #1: FRONT ELEVATION #2: REAR ELEVATION #3: RIGHT ELEVATION #4: LEFT ELEVATION #5: ADA, RESTROOM, LAVATORY PIPE WRAPS #6: SIDEWALK PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #7: PARKING LOTS, ASPHALT PAVEMENT #8: PARKING LOTS, MINOR CRACKING #9: BUILDING SIGNAGE #10: WALKWAY BOLLARD LIGHTING #11: POLE LIGHT, EXTERIOR, DECORATIVE #12: POLE LIGHT, EXTERIOR, DOUBLE FIXTURE PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #13: POLE LIGHT, EXTERIOR, SINGLE FIXTURE #14: FENCES & GATES, WROUGHT IRON #15: BENCH #16: ROOF, METAL #17: ROOF, SINGLE-PLY EPDM MEMBRANE #18: PONDING AT DRAINS PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #19: EXTERIOR WALL, PAINTED SURFACE #20: EXTERIOR DOOR, FULLY- GLAZED ALUMINUM-FRAMED SWINGING #21: EXTERIOR DOOR, FULLY- GLAZED ALUMINUM-FRAMED SWINGING MOTOR-OPERATED #22: EXTERIOR DOOR, STEEL #23: STOREFRONT, METAL-FRAMED WINDOWS #24: CURTAIN WALL, ALUMINUM- FRAMED SYSTEM W/ GLAZING PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #25: WINDOW, ALUMINUM DOUBLE- GLAZED #26: WINDOW, ALUMINUM DOUBLE- GLAZED #27: AIR HANDLER #28: RADIANT CEILING PANELS #29: CONDENSING UNIT/HEAT PUMP #30: CHILLER PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #31: AIR HANDLER #32: CABINET HEATER #33: CIRCULATION PUMP, CHILLER WATER #34: CIRCULATION PUMP, HEATING WATER, PRIMARY #35: CIRCULATION PUMP, HEATING WATER, SECONDARY #36: HUMIDIFIER, STEAM, DUCT W/ CONTROLS PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #37: BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEM (HVAC CONTROLS) #38: INTERIOR STAIRS #39: BOILER #40: AIR CONDITIONER, COMPUTER ROOM #41: VARIABLE AIR VOLUME (VAV) UNIT #42: GLYCOL FEED SYSTEM PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #43: RADIATOR, HYDRONIC BASEBOARD #44: EXHAUST FAN, ROOF MOUNTED #45: DRINKING FOUNTAIN, REFRIGERATED #46: BACKFLOW PREVENTER, 2" #47: WATER HEATER, CONDENSING STYLE, HIGH EFFICIENCY #48: SERVICE SINK PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #49: LAVATORY #50: WATER SOFTENER #51: TOILET, TANKLESS #52: DRINKING FOUNTAIN, REFRIGERATED #53: LAVATORY #54: URINAL PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #55: SINK, STAINLESS STEEL #56: BACKFLOW PREVENTER, 3" #57: VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE (VFD) #58: SECONDARY TRANSFORMER, DRY #59: LIGHTING SYSTEM #60: METAL HALIDE LIGHTING FIXTURE, WALL MOUNT PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #61: MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL #62: SWITCHBOARD, 1,000 AMP #63: ELEVATOR, HYDRAULIC #64: ELEVATOR, MACHINERY #65: CAMERA, SECURITY SYSTEM #66: EXIT LIGHTING FIXTURE, LED PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #67: BACKFLOW PREVENTER, 4" #68: FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL, ADDRESSABLE #69: FIRE EXTINGUISHER #70: INTERIOR DOOR #71: RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES, REFRIGERATOR #72: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, CERAMIC TILE PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #73: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, WALLPAPER #74: TOILET PARTITIONS #75: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, VINYL TILE (VCT) #76: INTERIOR WINDOW #77: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, CERAMIC TILE #78: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, CARPET PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #79: INTERIOR DOOR, BI-FOLD #80: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, GYPSUM BOARD #81: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, WOOD STRIP #82: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, GYPSUM BOARD #83: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, WOOD PANELING #84: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, ACOUSTICAL TILE (ACT) PUBLIC LIBRARY 902 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #85: INTERIOR DOOR, FIRE 90- MINUTES AND OVER #86: INTERIOR DOOR, FULLY- GLAZED WOOD-FRAMED #87: KITCHEN CABINET, BASE AND WALL SECTION, WOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix B: Site Plan Site Plan Project Name: Public Library Project Number: 122700.17R000-008.322 Source: Google Maps On-Site Date: May 24, 2017 PUBLIC LIBRARY EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-008.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Page 1 of 4 Date Completed: June 14, 2017 Property Name: Public Library EMG Project Number: 122700.17R000-008.322 Building History Yes No Unk Comments 1 Has an ADA survey previously been completed for this property? X 2 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? X 3 Does a Transition Plan / Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? X 4 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints that have not been resolved? X 5 Is any litigation pending related to ADA issues? X Parking Yes No NA Comments 1 Are there sufficient accessible parking spaces with respect to the total number of reported spaces? X 2 Are there sufficient van-accessible parking spaces available? X 3 Are accessible spaces marked with the International Symbol of Accessibility? Are there signs reading “Van Accessible” at van spaces? X 4 Is there at least one accessible route provided within the boundary of the site from public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones, if provided, and public streets and sidewalks? X 5 Do curbs on the accessible route have depressed, ramped curb cuts at drives, paths, and drop-offs? X 6 If required does signage exist directing you to accessible parking and an accessible building entrance? X Ramps Yes No NA Comments 1* Do all ramps along accessible path of travel appear to meet slope requirements? ( 1:12 or less) X 2 Are ramps that appear longer than 6 ft complete with railings on both sides? X Page 2 of 4 Ramps (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 3 Does the width between railings appear at least 36 inches? X 4 Is there a level landing for approximately every 30 ft horizontal length of ramp, at the top and at the bottom of ramps and switchbacks? X Entrances/Exits Yes No NA Comments 1 Do all required accessible entrance doorways appear at least 32 inches wide and not a revolving door? X 2 If the main entrance is inaccessible, are there alternate accessible entrances? X 3 Is the door hardware easy to operate (lever/push type hardware, no twisting required and not higher than approximately 48 inches above the floor)? X Paths of Travel Yes No NA Comments 1 Are all paths of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair (appear at least 36 inches wide)? X 2 Are wheelchair-accessible facilities (toilet rooms, exits, etc.) identified with signage? X 3 Is there a path of travel that does not require the use of stairs? X Elevators Yes No NA Comments 1 Do the call buttons have visual and audible signals to indicate when a call is registered and answered when car arrives? X 2 Are there visual and audible signals inside cars indicating floor change? X 3 Are there standard raised and Braille marking on both jambs of each hoist way entrance as well as all cab/call buttons? X 4 Do elevator doors have a reopening device that will stop and reopen a car door if an object or a person obstructs the door? X 5 Are elevator controls low enough to be reached from a wheelchair (appears to be between 15 and 48 inches)? X 6 If a two-way emergency communication system is provided within the elevator cab, is it usable without voice communication? X Page 3 of 4 Toilet Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 Are common area public restrooms located on an accessible route? X 2 Are pull handles push/pull or lever type? X 3 Are there audible and visual fire alarm devices in the toilet rooms? X 4 Are toilet room access doors wheelchair- accessible (appear to be at least 32 inches wide)? X 5 Are public restrooms large enough to accommodate a wheelchair turnaround (appear to have 60” turning diameter)? X 6 In unisex toilet rooms, are there safety alarms with pull cords? X 7 Are toilet stall doors wheelchair accessible (appear to be at least 32” wide)? X 8 Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? X 9 Are sinks provided with clearance for a wheelchair to roll under (appear to have 29” clearance)? X 10 Are sink handles operable with one hand without grasping, pinching or twisting? X 11 Are exposed pipes under sink sufficiently insulated against contact? X Missing in 1983 wing of building but installed in main building. Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 How many total accessible sleeping rooms does the property management report to have? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible sleeping rooms with respect to the total number of reported guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X Page 4 of 4 Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 2 How many of the accessible sleeping rooms per property management have roll- in showers? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible rooms with roll-in showers with respect to the total number of reported accessible guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X 3 How many assistive listening kits and/or rooms with communication features are available per property management? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported assistive listening devices with respect to the total number of rooms? See attached hot sheet. X Pools Yes No NA Comments 1 Are public access pools provided? If the answer is no, please disregard this section. X 2 How many accessible access points are provided to each pool/spa? Provide number in comment field. Is at least one fixed lift or sloped entry to the pool provided? X Play Area Yes No NA Comments 1 Has the play area been reviewed for accessibility? All public playgrounds are subject to ADAAG standards. X Exercise Equipment Yes No NA Comments 1 Does there appear to be adequate clear floor space around the machines/equipment (30” by 48” minimum)? X *Based on visual observation only. The slope was not confirmed through measurements. EMG Corporate Headquarters 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100, Owings Mills, MD 21117 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Prepared for: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT City Hall/Police Department 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 PREPARED BY: EMG CONTACT: EMG Andrew Hupp 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Senior Engineering Consultant Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 800.733.0660 x6632 800.733.0660 arhupp@emgcorp.com www.EMGcorp.com EMG Project Number: Date of Report: On Site Date: 122700.17R000-004.322 September 13, 2017 May 18, 2017 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT Immediate Repairs Report City Hall/Police Department 9/13/2017 Location Name EMG Renamed Item NumberID Cost Description QuantityUnit Unit Cost Subtotal Deficiency Repair Estimate * City Hall/Police Department 3.1 610281 Accessible Parking, Parking, Designated Stall with Pavement Markings & Signage (Van),2 EA $1,391.50 $2,783 $2,783 City Hall/Police Department 3.1 610289 Accessible Restroom, Restroom, Lavatory Pipe Wraps,7 EA $75.90 $531 $531 City Hall/Police Department 5.2 610309 Parking Lot, Parking Lot, Repair 6275 SF $0.38 $2,381 $2,381 City Hall/Police Department 5.2 610262 Parking Lot, Parking Lot, Repair 11590 SF $0.38 $4,398 $4,398 City Hall/Police Department 5.2 610347 Parking Lot, Parking Lot, Repair 8410 SF $0.38 $3,192 $3,192 City Hall/Police Department 5.5 610260 Exterior Light Pole, Exterior, 135 to 1000 W HID (Fixture, Ballast, & Lamp), Repair 8 EA $2,246.90 $17,975 $17,975 City Hall/Police Department 6.3 610266 Roof, Premium Grade, Replace 14300 SF $5.04 $72,069 $72,069 City Hall/Police Department 6.5 610311 Exterior Stair/Ramp, (per LF of Nosing), Replace 80 LF $8.54 $683 $683 City Hall/Police Department 6.6 610304 Exterior Door, Exterior Door, Repair 7 EA $69.94 $490 $490 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610273 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610313 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610328 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 1 Ton, Replace 1 EA $2,118.94 $2,119 $2,119 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610297 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610337 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610308 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610336 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610283 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610272 HVAC System, Full Upgrade, Office (per SF),1000 SF $37.86 $37,859 $37,859 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610332 Water Pumps, 1 to 3 HP, Replace 1 EA $2,993.56 $2,994 $2,994 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610345 Water Pumps, 1 to 3 HP, Replace 1 EA $2,993.56 $2,994 $2,994 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610294 Water Pumps, 1 to 3 HP, Replace 1 EA $2,993.56 $2,994 $2,994 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610317 Water Pumps, 1 to 3 HP, Replace 1 EA $2,993.56 $2,994 $2,994 City Hall/Police Department 8.1 610290 Floor Finishings, Standard Commercial, Medium Traffic, Replace 1500 SF $7.26 $10,884 $10,884 Immediate Repairs Total $212,418 * Location Factor included in totals. Replacement Reserves Report City Hall/Police Department 9/13/2017 Location Name EMG Renamed Item Number ID Cost Description Lifespan (EUL)EAge RUL QuantityUnit Unit Cost Subtotal 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Deficiency Repair Estimate City Hall/Police Department 3.1 610281 Accessible Parking, Parking, Designated Stall with Pavement Markings & Signage (Van),0 0 0 2 EA $1,391.50 $2,783 $2,783 $2,783 City Hall/Police Department 3.1 610289 Accessible Restroom, Restroom, Lavatory Pipe Wraps,0 0 0 7 EA $75.90 $531 $531 $531 City Hall/Police Department 5.2 610309 Parking Lot, Parking Lot, Repair 5 17 0 6275 SF $0.38 $2,381 $2,381 $2,381 $2,381 $2,381 $9,525 City Hall/Police Department 5.2 610262 Parking Lot, Parking Lot, Repair 5 17 0 11590 SF $0.38 $4,398 $4,398 $4,398 $4,398 $4,398 $17,594 City Hall/Police Department 5.2 610347 Parking Lot, Parking Lot, Repair 5 17 0 8410 SF $0.38 $3,192 $3,192 $3,192 $3,192 $3,192 $12,766 City Hall/Police Department 5.2 610282 Parking Lot, Parking Lot, Repair 25 20 5 8410 SF $3.28 $27,588 $27,588 $27,588 City Hall/Police Department 5.2 610258 Pedestrian Pavement, , Replace 30 17 13 2825 SF $19.82 $55,997 $55,997 $55,997 City Hall/Police Department 5.5 610287 Lighting Fixture, 80 W, Replace 20 17 3 9 EA $256.88 $2,312 $2,312 $2,312 City Hall/Police Department 5.5 610322 Site Signage, Property, Monument/Pylon, Replace/Install 20 12 8 1 EA $8,602.00 $8,602 $8,602 $8,602 City Hall/Police Department 5.5 610260 Exterior Light Pole, Exterior, 135 to 1000 W HID (Fixture, Ballast, & Lamp), Repair 10 17 0 8 EA $2,246.90 $17,975 $17,975 $17,975 $35,950 City Hall/Police Department 6.3 610266 Roof, Premium Grade, Replace 30 30 0 14300 SF $5.04 $72,069 $72,069 $72,069 City Hall/Police Department 6.4 610335 Exterior Wall 10 7 3 200 LF $2.82 $564 $564 $564 $1,128 City Hall/Police Department 6.4 610286 Vinyl Siding, Exterior, 1-2 Stories, Replace 25 17 8 3850 SF $7.81 $30,065 $30,065 $30,065 City Hall/Police Department 6.4 610346 Brick Veneer Exterior Wall, Exterior, 1-2 Stories, Repair 25 17 8 40 SF $41.28 $1,651 $1,651 $1,651 City Hall/Police Department 6.5 610311 Exterior Stair/Ramp, (per LF of Nosing), Replace 0 17 0 80 LF $8.54 $683 $683 $683 City Hall/Police Department 6.6 610321 Window, Double Glazed, 1-2 Stories, 12 SF, Replace 30 17 13 14 EA $555.58 $7,778 $7,778 $7,778 City Hall/Police Department 6.6 610314 Window, Double Glazed, 1-2 Stories, 24 SF, Replace 30 17 13 39 EA $813.20 $31,715 $31,715 $31,715 City Hall/Police Department 6.6 610324 Storefront 30 17 13 40 SF $48.00 $1,920 $1,920 $1,920 City Hall/Police Department 6.6 610304 Exterior Door, Exterior Door, Repair 10 17 0 7 EA $69.94 $490 $490 $490 $979 City Hall/Police Department 6.6 610275 Exterior Door, Exterior Door, Replace 25 17 8 2 EA $1,352.72 $2,705 $2,705 $2,705 City Hall/Police Department 6.6 610291 Exterior Door, Insulated, Exterior Door, Replace 25 17 8 7 EA $1,577.53 $11,043 $11,043 $11,043 City Hall/Police Department 6.6 610327 Overhead Door, 144 SF, Replace 35 17 18 3 EA $4,025.54 $12,077 $12,077 $12,077 City Hall/Police Department 6.6 610318 Garage Door Opener, Belt Drive, 0.5 HP, Replace 15 7 8 3 EA $519.03 $1,557 $1,557 $1,557 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610334 Elevator, Hydraulic, 1500 to 2500 LB, 2 Floors,30 17 13 1 EA $108,794.40 $108,794 $108,794 $108,794 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610325 Water Heater, Gas, Commercial, 60 to 120 GAL, Replace 15 4 11 1 EA $10,698.82 $10,699 $10,699 $10,699 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610263 Hydraulic Pump, Submersible, 20 HP, Replace 15 8 7 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610273 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 15 17 0 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 $6,440 $12,880 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610313 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 15 17 0 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 $6,440 $12,880 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610328 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 1 Ton, Replace 15 17 0 1 EA $2,118.94 $2,119 $2,119 $2,119 $4,238 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610297 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 15 17 0 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 $6,440 $12,880 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610337 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 15 17 0 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 $6,440 $12,880 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610308 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 15 17 0 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 $6,440 $12,880 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610336 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 15 17 0 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 $6,440 $12,880 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610283 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 15 17 0 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 $6,440 $12,880 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610259 Split System, Split System DX, Air-Cooled, 5 Ton, Replace 15 8 7 1 EA $6,439.81 $6,440 $6,440 $6,440 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610306 Exhaust Fan, Centrifugal, 251 to 800 CFM, Replace 15 13 2 1 EA $2,021.87 $2,022 $2,022 $2,022 $4,044 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610296 Exhaust Fan, Centrifugal, 251 to 800 CFM, Replace 15 13 2 1 EA $2,021.87 $2,022 $2,022 $2,022 $4,044 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610272 HVAC System, Full Upgrade, Office (per SF),20 20 0 1000 SF $37.86 $37,859 $37,859 $37,859 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610331 Furnace, Gas, 101 to 150 MBH, Replace 20 17 3 1 EA $5,644.27 $5,644 $5,644 $5,644 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610265 Furnace, Gas, 101 to 150 MBH, Replace 20 17 3 1 EA $5,644.27 $5,644 $5,644 $5,644 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610285 Unit Heater, Natural Gas, 26 to 55 MBH, Replace 20 17 3 1 EA $4,281.60 $4,282 $4,282 $4,282 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610330 Furnace, Gas, 101 to 150 MBH, Replace 20 17 3 1 EA $5,644.27 $5,644 $5,644 $5,644 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610315 Unit Heater, Natural Gas, 26 to 55 MBH, Replace 20 17 3 1 EA $4,281.60 $4,282 $4,282 $4,282 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610329 Furnace, Gas, 101 to 150 MBH, Replace 20 17 3 1 EA $5,644.27 $5,644 $5,644 $5,644 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610343 Furnace, Gas, 101 to 150 MBH, Replace 20 17 3 1 EA $5,644.27 $5,644 $5,644 $5,644 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610307 Furnace, Gas, 101 to 150 MBH, Replace 20 17 3 1 EA $5,644.27 $5,644 $5,644 $5,644 Location Name EMG Renamed Item Number ID Cost Description Lifespan (EUL)EAge RUL QuantityUnit Unit Cost Subtotal 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Deficiency Repair Estimate City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610316 Furnace, Gas, 101 to 150 MBH, Replace 20 17 3 1 EA $5,644.27 $5,644 $5,644 $5,644 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610270 Unit Heater, Electric, Infrared, 1 to 2 kW, Replace 20 17 3 1 EA $1,095.84 $1,096 $1,096 $1,096 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610292 Furnace, Gas, 101 to 150 MBH, Replace 20 17 3 1 EA $5,644.27 $5,644 $5,644 $5,644 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610299 Unit Heater, Electric, Infrared, 3 to 6 kW, Replace 20 17 3 1 EA $1,741.57 $1,742 $1,742 $1,742 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610312 Transfer Switch, Auto, 600 V, 40 Amp, Replace 18 13 5 1 EA $6,704.24 $6,704 $6,704 $6,704 City Hall/Police Department 7.1 610340 Fire Alarm System, Addressable, Replace 15 13 2 1 EA $20,297.59 $20,298 $20,298 $20,298 $40,595 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610269 Toilet Partitions, Metal, Overhead Braced, Replace 20 12 8 2 EA $850.00 $1,700 $1,700 $1,700 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610293 Toilet, , Replace 20 12 8 4 EA $842.97 $3,372 $3,372 $3,372 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610279 Toilet, One Piece, Replace 20 12 8 2 EA $1,055.15 $2,110 $2,110 $2,110 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610319 Urinal, Vitreous China, Replace 20 12 8 3 EA $1,193.44 $3,580 $3,580 $3,580 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610303 Lavatory, Enameled Steel, Replace 20 12 8 7 EA $353.05 $2,471 $2,471 $2,471 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610268 Sink, Plastic, Replace 20 12 8 1 EA $575.99 $576 $576 $576 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610264 Bathtub/Shower, Fiberglass, Replace 20 12 8 2 EA $2,599.44 $5,199 $5,199 $5,199 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610288 Drinking Fountain, Refrigerated, Replace 10 8 2 3 EA $1,257.51 $3,773 $3,773 $3,773 $7,545 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610339 Emergency Eye Wash, , Replace 15 9 6 1 EA $1,417.04 $1,417 $1,417 $1,417 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610332 Water Pumps, 1 to 3 HP, Replace 15 17 0 1 EA $2,993.56 $2,994 $2,994 $2,994 $5,987 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610345 Water Pumps, 1 to 3 HP, Replace 15 17 0 1 EA $2,993.56 $2,994 $2,994 $2,994 $5,987 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610294 Water Pumps, 1 to 3 HP, Replace 15 17 0 1 EA $2,993.56 $2,994 $2,994 $2,994 $5,987 City Hall/Police Department 7.2 610317 Water Pumps, 1 to 3 HP, Replace 15 17 0 1 EA $2,993.56 $2,994 $2,994 $2,994 $5,987 City Hall/Police Department 7.4 610276 Distribution Panel, 208 Y, 120 V, 100 Amp, Replace 30 17 13 3 EA $5,079.93 $15,240 $15,240 $15,240 City Hall/Police Department 7.4 610320 Distribution Panel, 208 Y, 120 V, 100 Amp, Replace 30 17 13 5 EA $5,079.93 $25,400 $25,400 $25,400 City Hall/Police Department 7.4 610302 Distribution Panel, 208 Y, 120 V, 800 Amp, Replace 30 17 13 1 EA $13,423.81 $13,424 $13,424 $13,424 City Hall/Police Department 7.4 610261 Lighting & Branch Wiring System, Full Upgrade, Office (per SF),25 17 8 18568 SF $9.24 $171,605 $171,605 $171,605 City Hall/Police Department 7.4 610305 Generator, Diesel, 65 to 125 kW, Replace 25 13 12 1 EA $113,996.22 $113,996 $113,996 $113,996 City Hall/Police Department 7.4 610278 Ceiling Fan, Residential, Replace 15 12 3 10 EA $354.11 $3,541 $3,541 $3,541 $7,082 City Hall/Police Department 7.6 610333 Fire Extinguisher, , Replace 15 8 7 6 EA $356.54 $2,139 $2,139 $2,139 City Hall/Police Department 7.6 610344 Emergency Exit System, 2 Light w/ Battery, Replace 10 6 4 2 EA $1,227.87 $2,456 $2,456 $2,456 $4,911 City Hall/Police Department 7.6 610323 Emergency Exit System, w/ Battery, Replace 10 6 4 10 EA $418.95 $4,190 $4,190 $4,190 $8,379 City Hall/Police Department 7.6 610271 Defibrillator, Cabinet Mounted, Replace 5 3 2 1 EA $1,409.50 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $5,638 City Hall/Police Department 8.1 610295 Interior Door, , Replace 15 12 3 4 EA $762.99 $3,052 $3,052 $3,052 $6,104 City Hall/Police Department 8.1 610338 Interior Door, Painted/Stained, Fully Glazed, Interior Door, Replace 15 12 3 3 EA $1,982.31 $5,947 $5,947 $5,947 $11,894 City Hall/Police Department 8.1 610326 Interior Door, , Replace 20 12 8 11 EA $1,649.06 $18,140 $18,140 $18,140 City Hall/Police Department 8.1 610342 Interior Door, Solid Core, Painted/Stained, Interior Door, Replace 20 12 8 47 EA $1,423.11 $66,886 $66,886 $66,886 City Hall/Police Department 8.1 610280 Interior Walls, Interior Wall, Repair 8 1 7 36208 SF $1.42 $51,531 $51,531 $51,531 $103,062 City Hall/Police Department 8.1 610298 Floor Finishings, , Replace 15 10 5 1856 SF $4.80 $8,910 $8,910 $8,910 City Hall/Police Department 8.1 610290 Floor Finishings, Standard Commercial, Medium Traffic, Replace 10 17 0 1500 SF $7.26 $10,884 $10,884 $10,884 $21,769 City Hall/Police Department 8.1 610274 Ceilings, Ceiling, Repair 10 8 2 12070 SF $1.94 $23,375 $23,375 $23,375 $46,750 City Hall/Police Department 8.1 610348 Ceilings, , Replace 20 8 12 12070 SF $3.11 $37,550 $37,550 $37,550 City Hall/Police Department 8.1 610300 Refrigerator, Residential, 14-18 CF,15 9 6 2 EA $956.04 $1,912 $1,912 $1,912 City Hall/Police Department 8.1 610284 Range, Gas, Residential,15 9 6 1 EA $768.11 $768 $768 $768 City Hall/Police Department 8.1 610277 Kitchen Cabinet, Base and Wall Section, Wood, Replace 20 12 8 16 LF $467.63 $7,482 $7,482 $7,482 Totals, Unescalated $212,418 $0 $52,898 $71,971 $6,645 $53,174 $4,097 $66,520 $338,746 $0 $39,321 $10,699 $180,103 $260,831 $6,645 $120,674 $0 $25,751 $24,617 $0 $1,475,110 Totals, Escalated (3.0% inflation, compounded annually)$212,418 $0 $56,120 $78,644 $7,479 $61,643 $4,892 $81,811 $429,113 $0 $52,844 $14,810 $256,783 $383,039 $10,052 $188,007 $0 $42,562 $41,908 $0 $1,922,126 CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition ................................................................ 1 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations ...................................................................... 3 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Scope .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Personnel Interviewed ................................................................................................................. 7 2.4. Documentation Reviewed ........................................................................................................... 7 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire ........................................................................................................... 7 2.6. Weather Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 7 3. Accessibility and Property Research ................................................................................................. 8 3.1. ADA Accessibility ........................................................................................................................ 8 4. Existing Building Assessment ............................................................................................................ 9 4.1. Unit or Space Types .................................................................................................................... 9 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed ...................................................................... 9 5. Site Improvements ............................................................................................................................. 10 5.1. Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 10 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks ................................................................................................ 10 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control .................................................................................... 11 5.4. Topography and Landscaping ................................................................................................... 12 5.5. General Site Improvements ....................................................................................................... 12 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems ............................................................................... 14 6.1. Foundations ............................................................................................................................... 14 6.2. Superstructure ........................................................................................................................... 14 6.3. Roofing ...................................................................................................................................... 14 6.4. Exterior Walls ............................................................................................................................ 15 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs ......................................................................................................... 16 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors ..................................................................................................... 16 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony ...................................................................................................... 17 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems .................................................................................. 18 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) ..................................................... 18 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water ............................................................................. 19 7.3. Building Gas Distribution ........................................................................................................... 20 7.4. Building Electrical ...................................................................................................................... 20 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems .............................................................................. 21 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems ....................................................................................... 22 8. Interior Spaces .................................................................................................................................... 24 8.1. Interior Finishes ......................................................................................................................... 24 9. Other Structures ................................................................................................................................. 26 10. Certification ......................................................................................................................................... 27 11. Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 28 CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 1 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition The property information is summarized in the table below. More detailed descriptions may be found in the various sections of the report and in the Appendices. Property Information Address: 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL 60560 Year Constructed/Renovated: Constructed 2000 Current Occupants: City of Yorkville Percent Utilization: 100% Management Point of Contact: Mr. Peter Ratos, Building Code Official, City of Yorkville 630.553.8574 phone Property Type: Municipal Site Area: 1 acre Building Area: 18,988 SF Number of Buildings: 1 Number of Stories: 2 Parking Type and Number of Spaces: 66 spaces in open lots (12 for police vehicles) Building Construction: Wood and concrete framed structure set on a concrete slab Roof Construction: Pitched roof with asphalt shingles Exterior Finishes: Brick veneer Vinyl siding Heating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning: Central system with furnaces and split-system condensing units Supplemental components: electric wall heaters Fire and Life/Safety: Fire sprinklers, hydrants, smoke detectors, alarms, strobes, extinguishers, pull stations, alarm panel, exit signs, and backup light fixtures. Dates of Visit: May 18, 2017 On-Site Point of Contact (POC): Peter Ratos Assessment and Report Prepared by: Kevin Koranda Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 Systemic Condition Summary Site Fair HVAC Fair to Poor CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 2 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Systemic Condition Summary Structure Fair Plumbing Fair Roof Fair to Poor Electrical Fair Vertical Envelope Fair Elevators Fair Interiors Fair Fire Fair The following bullet points highlight the most significant short term and modernization recommendations:  Roof replacement  HVAC upgrades and replacement of aged condensing units and furnaces  Asphalt parking area milling and overlaying  Site lighting replacements  Interior carpet replacements  Sprinkler system retrofit Generally, the property appears to have been constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained in recent years and is in fair overall condition. According to property management personnel, the property has not had a capital improvement expenditure program over the past three years. 1.2. F acility Condition Index (FCI) One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate the FCI, which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. Two FCI ratios are calculated and presented, the Current Year and Ten-Year. The Current Year FCI is the ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to the building’s Current Replacement Value. Similarly, the Ten-Year FCI is the ratio of anticipated Capital Reserve Needs over the next ten years to the Current Replacement Value. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 3 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Fci Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value Good In new or well-maintained condition, with no visual evidence of wear, soiling or other deficiencies. 0% to 5% Fair Subjected to wear and soiling but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. > than 5% to 10% Poor Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. > than 10% to 60% Very Poor Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal is now necessary. > than 60% The graphs above and tables below represent summary-level findings for the FCA. The deficiencies identified in this assessment can be combined with potential new construction requirements to develop an overall strategy that can serve as the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy. Key findings from the assessment include: Key Finding Metric Current Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (IR)/(CRV) 7.7% Fair 10-Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (RR)/(CRV) 24.7% Poor Current Replacement Value (CRV) 18,988 SF * 183.24 / SF = $3,479,307 Year 0 (Current Year) - Immediate Repairs (IR) $271,023 Years 1-10 – Replacement Reserves (RR) $860,877 Total Capital Needs $1,131,900 The major issues contributing to the Immediate Repair Costs and the Current Year FCI ratio are summarized below:  Roof replacement  HVAC upgrades and replacement of aged condensing units and furnaces  Asphalt parking area milling and overlaying  Site lighting replacements  Interior carpet replacements Further detail on the specific costs that make up the Immediate Repair Costs can be found in the cost tables at the beginning of this report. 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations As part of the FCA, a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) was performed to determine the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. Property personnel were interviewed concerning any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Sampling is not a part of this assessment. There are no visual indications of the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, or evidence of moisture in representative readily accessible areas of the property. 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost Cost estimates are attached at the front of this report (following the cover page). These estimates are based on Invoice or Bid Document/s provided either by the Owner/facility and construction costs developed by construction resources such as R.S. Means and Marshall & Swift, EMG’s experience with past costs for similar properties, city cost indexes, and assumptions regarding future economic conditions. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 4 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary, order of magnitude budgets. Actual costs most probably will vary from the consultant’s opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy, quality of materials and installation, manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected, field conditions, whether a physical deficiency is repaired or replaced in whole, phasing of the work (if applicable), quality of contractor, quality of project management exercised, market conditions, and whether competitive pricing is solicited, etc. ASTM E2018-08 recognizes that certain opinions of probable costs cannot be developed within the scope of this guide without further study. Opinions of probable cost for further study should be included in the FCA. 1.4.1. Methodology Based upon site observations, research, and judgment, along with referencing Expected Useful Life (EUL) tables from various industry sources, EMG opines as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement. Accurate historical replacement records, if provided, are typically the best source of information. Exposure to the elements, initial quality and installation, extent of use, the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised, etc., are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component. As a result, a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual chronological age. The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age. Projections of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) are based on continued use of the Property similar to the reported past use. Significant changes in occupants and/or usage may affect the service life of some systems or components. Where quantities could not be derived from an actual take-off, lump sum costs or allowances are used. Estimated costs are based on professional judgment and the probable or actual extent of the observed defect, inclusive of the cost to design, procure, construct and manage the corrections. 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs Immediate repairs are opinions of probable costs that require immediate action as a result of: (1) material existing or potential unsafe conditions, (2) material building or fire code violations, or (3) conditions that, if not addressed, have the potential to result in, or contribute to, critical element or system failure within one year or will most probably result in a significant escalation of its remedial cost. 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves Replacement Reserves are for recurring probable expenditures, which are not classified as operation or maintenance expenses. The replacement reserves should be budgeted for in advance on an annual basis. Replacement Reserves are reasonably predictable both in terms of frequency and cost. However, Replacement Reserves may also include components or systems that have an indeterminable life but, nonetheless, have a potential for failure within an estimated time period. Replacement Reserves exclude systems or components that are estimated to expire after the reserve term and are not considered material to the structural and mechanical integrity of the subject property. Furthermore, systems and components that are not deemed to have a material effect on the use of the Property are also excluded. Costs that are caused by acts of God, accidents, or other occurrences that are typically covered by insurance, rather than reserved for, are also excluded. Replacement costs are solicited from ownership/property management, EMG’s discussions with service companies, manufacturers' representatives, and previous experience in preparing such schedules for other similar facilities. Costs for work performed by the ownership’s or property management’s maintenance staff are also considered. EMG’s reserve methodology involves identification and quantification of those systems or components requiring capital reserve funds within the assessment period. The assessment period is defined as the effective age plus the reserve term. Additional information concerning system’s or component’s respective replacement costs (in today's dollars), typical expected useful lives, and remaining useful lives were estimated so that a funding schedule could be prepared. The Replacement Reserves Schedule presupposes that all required remedial work has been performed or that monies for remediation have been budgeted for items defined in the Immediate Repair Cost Estimate. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 5 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2. Purpose and Scope 2.1. Purpose EMG was retained by the client to render an opinion as to the Property’s current general physical condition on the day of the site visit. Based on the observations, interviews and document review outlined below, this report identifies significant deferred maintenance issues, existing deficiencies, and material code violations of record at municipal offices, which affect the Property’s use. Opinions are rendered as to its structural integrity, building system condition and the Property’s overall condition. The report also notes building systems or components that have realized or exceeded their typical expected useful lives. CONDITIONS: The physical condition of building systems and related components are typically defined as being in one of five conditions: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Failed or a combination thereof. For the purposes of this report, the following definitions are used: Excellent = New or very close to new; component or system typically has been installed within the past year, sound and performing its function. Eventual repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Good = Satisfactory as-is. Component or system is sound and performing its function, typically within the first third of its lifecycle. However, it may show minor signs of normal wear and tear. Repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Fair = Showing signs of wear and use but still satisfactory as-is, typically near the median of its estimated useful life. Component or system is performing adequately at this time but may exhibit some signs of wear, deferred maintenance, or evidence of previous repairs. Repair or replacement will be required due to the component or system’s condition and/or its estimated remaining useful life. Poor = Component or system is significantly aged, flawed, functioning intermittently or unreliably; displays obvious signs of deferred maintenance; shows evidence of previous repair or workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards; has become obsolete; or exhibits an inherent deficiency. The present condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of contiguous elements or systems. Either full component replacement is needed or repairs are required to restore to good condition, prevent premature failure, and/or prolong useful life. Failed = Component or system has ceased functioning or performing as intended. Replacement, repair, or other significant corrective action is recommended or required. Not Applicable = Assigning a condition does not apply or make logical sense, most commonly due to the item in question not being present. FORMAT OF THE BODY OF THE REPORT: Throughout sections 5 through 9 of this report, each report section will typically contain three subsections organized in the following sequence:  A descriptive table (and/or narrative), which identifies the components assessed, their condition, and other key data points.  A simple bulleted list of Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements, which lists components and assets typically in Excellent, Good, or Fair condition at the time of the assessment but that will require replacement or some other attention once aged past their estimated useful life. These listed components are typically included in the associated inventory database with costs identified and budgeted beyond the first several years.  A bulleted cluster of Actions/Comments, which include more detailed narratives describing deficiencies, recommended repairs, and short term replacements. The assets and components associated with these bullets are/were typically problematic and in Poor or Failed condition at the time of the assessment, with corresponding costs included within the first few years. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 6 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PLAN TYPES: Each line item in the cost database is assigned a Plan Type, which is the primary reason or rationale for the recommended replacement, repair, or other corrective action. This is the “why” part of the equation. A cost or line item may commonly have more than one applicable Plan Type; however, only one Plan Type will be assigned based on the “best” fit, typically the one with the greatest significance. The following Plan Types are listed in general weighted order of importance: Safety = An observed or reported unsafe condition that if left unaddressed could result in an injury; a system or component that presents a potential liability risk. Performance/Integrity = Component or system has failed, is almost failing, performs unreliably, does not perform as intended, and/or poses a risk to overall system stability. Accessibility = Does not meet ADA, UFAS, and/or other handicap accessibility requirements. Environmental = Improvements to air or water quality, including removal of hazardous materials from the building or site. Modernization/Adaptation = Conditions, systems, or spaces that need to be upgraded in appearance or function to meet current standards, facility usage, or client/occupant needs. Lifecycle/Renewal = Any component or system in which future repair or replacement is anticipated beyond the next several years and/or is of minimal substantial early-term consequence. 2.2. Scope The standard scope of the Facility Condition Assessment includes the following:  Visit the Property to evaluate the general condition of the building and site improvements, review available construction documents in order to familiarize ourselves with, and be able to comment on, the in-place construction systems, life safety, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and the general built environment.  Identify those components that are exhibiting deferred maintenance issues and provide cost estimates for Immediate Costs and Replacement Reserves based on observed conditions, maintenance history and industry standard useful life estimates. This will include the review of documented capital improvements completed within the last five-year period and work currently contracted for, if applicable.  Provide a full description of the Property with descriptions of in-place systems and commentary on observed conditions.  Provide a general statement of the subject Property’s compliance to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This will not constitute a full ADA survey, but will help identify exposure to issues and the need for further review.  Perform a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) for the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. EMG will also interview Project personnel regarding the presence of any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Potentially affected areas will be photographed. Sampling will not be considered in routine assessments.  List the current utility service providers.  Review maintenance records and procedures with the in-place maintenance personnel.  Observe a representative sample of the interior spaces/units, including vacant spaces/units, in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas to be observed include the exterior of the property, the roofs, interior common areas, and the significant mechanical, electrical and elevator equipment rooms.  Provide recommendations for additional studies, if required, with related budgetary information.  Provide an Executive Summary at the beginning of this report.  Prepare a mechanical equipment inventory list. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 7 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2.3. Personnel Interviewed The management staff was interviewed for specific information relating to the physical property, available maintenance procedures, historical performance of key building systems and components, available drawings and other documentation. The following personnel from the facility and government agencies were interviewed in the process of conducting the FCA: Name and Title Organization Phone Number Peter Ratos Building Code Official City of Yorkville 630.553.8574 The FCA was performed with the assistance of Peter Ratos, Building Code Official, City of Yorkville, the onsite Point of Contact (POC), who was cooperative and provided information that appeared to be accurate based upon subsequent site observations. The onsite contact is completely knowledgeable about the subject property and answered most questions posed during the interview process. The POC’s involvement with the property has spanned the past 6 years. 2.4. Documentation Reviewed Prior to the FCA, relevant documentation was requested that could aid in the knowledge of the subject property’s physical improvements, extent and type of use, and/or assist in identifying material discrepancies between reported information and observed conditions. The review of submitted documents does not include comment on the accuracy of such documents or their preparation, methodology, or protocol. The Documentation Request Form is provided in Appendix E. 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire A Pre-Survey Questionnaire was sent to the POC prior to the site visit. The questionnaire is included in Appendix E. Information obtained from the questionnaire has been used in preparation of this report. 2.6. Weather Conditions 5/18/17: Clear, with temperatures in the 70s (°F) and light winds. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 8 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 3. Accessibility and Property Research 3.1. ADA Accessibility Generally, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by entities to access and use of “areas of public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” on the basis of disability. Regardless of its age, these areas and facilities must be maintained and operated to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). Buildings completed and occupied after January 26, 1992 are required to comply fully with the ADAAG. Existing facilities constructed prior to this date are held to the lesser standard of compliance to the extent allowed by structural feasibility and the financial resources available. As an alternative, a reasonable accommodation pertaining to the deficiency must be made. During the FCA, a limited visual observation for ADA accessibility compliance was conducted. The scope of the visual observation was limited to those areas set forth in EMG’s Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist provided in Appendix D of this report. It is understood by the Client that the limited observations described herein does not comprise a full ADA Compliance Survey, and that such a survey is beyond the scope of EMG’s undertaking. Only a representative sample of areas was observed and, other than as shown on the Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist, actual measurements were not taken to verify compliance. The facility does not appear to be accessible with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Elements as defined by the ADAAG that are not accessible as stated within the priorities of Title III, are as follows: Parking  Signage indicating accessible parking spaces for cars and vans are not provided. Restrooms.  Wrap drain pipes below lavatory with insulation; protect against contact with hot, sharp, or abrasive surfaces. A full ADA Compliance Survey may reveal additional aspects of the property that are not in compliance. Corrections of these conditions should be addressed from a liability standpoint, but are not necessarily code violations. The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines concern civil rights issues as they pertain to the disabled and are not a construction code, although many local jurisdictions have adopted the Guidelines as such. The cost to address the achievable items noted above is included in the cost tables. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 9 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 4. Existing Building Assessment 4.1. Unit or Space Types All 18,988 square feet of the building are currently occupied by the City of Yorkville and is used as the city hall and police department. The spaces are mostly office areas. Other significant spaces include: the city council chambers and meeting rooms, and a police vehicle service bay. Other spaces include a combination of restrooms, mechanical spaces, storage areas, and other utility spaces. 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed All of the interior spaces were observed in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas accessed included the site within the property boundaries, exterior of the property and the roof. All areas of the property were available for observation during the site visit. A “down unit” or area is a term used to describe a unit or space that cannot be occupied due to poor conditions such as fire damage, water damage, missing equipment, damaged floor, wall or ceiling surfaces, or other significant deficiencies. There are no down units or areas. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 10 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 5. Site Improvements 5.1. Utilities The following table identifies the utility suppliers and the condition and adequacy of the services. Site Utilities Utility Supplier Condition and Adequacy Sanitary sewer City of Yorkville Good and Adequate Storm sewer City of Yorkville Good and Adequate Domestic water City of Yorkville Good and Adequate Electric service Commonwealth Edison Good and Adequate Natural gas service Nicor Gas Good and Adequate Actions/Comments:  According to the POC, the utilities provided are adequate for the property. There are no unique, onsite utility systems such as septic systems, water or waste water treatment plants, or propane gas tanks. An emergency electrical generator is located on the site. 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks Item Description Main Ingress and Egress Game Farm Road Access from West Additional Entrances Adjacent parking areas/drive aisles Additional Access from North and South Paving and Flatwork Item Material Last Work Done Condition Entrance Driveway Apron Asphalt 2000 Fair Parking Lot Asphalt 2000 Fair to Poor Drive Aisles Asphalt 2000 Fair to Poor Service Aisles None -- -- Sidewalks Concrete 2000 Fair Curbs Concrete 2000 Fair Site Stairs Concrete 2000 Fair to Poor Pedestrian Ramps Concrete 2000 Fair CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 11 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Parking Count Open Lot Carport Private Garage Subterranean Garage Freestanding Parking Structure 54 spaces 12 spaces for police vehicles - - - - Total Number of ADA Compliant Spaces 2 Number of ADA Compliant Spaces for Vans 0 Total Parking Spaces 66 Parking Ratio (Spaces/Apartments) NA Method of Obtaining Parking Count Physical count Exterior Stairs Location Material Handrails Condition None -- -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Asphalt seal coating  Asphalt milling and overlaying  Sidewalks Actions/Comments:  The asphalt pavement exhibits significant areas of deterioration in the form of alligator cracking, raveling, and medium-sized depressions. The deterioration primarily affects the west lot and northeast lot. All of the paving must be overlaid with new asphalt paving in order to maintain the integrity of the overall pavement system. 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control Drainage System and Erosion Control System Exists At Site Condition Surface Flow ☐ -- Inlets ☒ Fair Swales ☒ Fair Detention pond ☐ -- Lagoons ☐ -- Ponds ☐ -- Underground Piping ☒ Fair Pits ☐ -- Municipal System ☒ Fair Dry Well ☐ -- CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 12 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  There is no evidence of storm water runoff from adjacent properties. The storm water system appears to provide adequate runoff capacity. There is no evidence of major ponding or erosion. 5.4. Topography and Landscaping Item Description Site Topography Relatively flat Landscaping Trees Grass Flower Beds Planters Drought Tolerant Plants Decorative Stone None ☒ ☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Landscaping Condition Fair Irrigation Automatic Underground Drip Hand Watering None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Irrigation Condition -- Retaining Walls Type Location Condition Concrete Stairwells Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The topography and adjacent uses do not appear to present conditions detrimental to the property. There are no significant areas of erosion. 5.5. General Site Improvements Property Signage Property Signage Post mounted wood Street Address Displayed? Yes CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 13 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Site and Building Lighting Site Lighting None Pole Mounted Bollard Lights Ground Mounted Parking Lot Pole Type ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ Fair Building Lighting None Wall Mounted Recessed Soffit ☐ ☒ ☒ Fair REFUSE DISPOSAL Refuse Disposal Common area dumpsters Dumpster Locations Mounting Enclosure Contracted? Condition Northeast parking area Concrete pad Chain link fence Yes Fair Other Site Amenities Description Location Condition Playground Equipment None -- -- Tennis Courts None -- -- Basketball Court None -- -- Swimming Pool None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Exterior lighting  Site lighting Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 14 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems 6.1. Foundations Building Foundation Item Description Condition Foundation Concrete foundation walls Good Basement and Crawl Space Concrete slab and concrete walls Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  Isolated areas of the foundation systems are exposed, which allows for limited observation. The foundation systems are concealed. There are no significant signs of settlement, deflection, or movement. The basement walls appear intact and structurally sound. There is no evidence of movement or water infiltration. 6.2. Superstructure Building Superstructure Item Description Condition Framing / Load-Bearing Walls Conventional wood/metal studs Good Ground Floor Concrete slab Good Upper Floor Framing Concrete beams Good Upper Floor Decking Metal decking Good Roof Framing Wood trusses Good Roof Decking Plywood or OSB Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The superstructure is exposed in some locations, which allows for limited observation. Walls and floors appear to be plumb, level, and stable. There are no significant signs of deflection or movement. 6.3. Roofing Primary Roof Type / Geometry Hip Roof Finish Asphalt shingles CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 15 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Primary Roof Maintenance In-house Staff Roof Age 18 Yrs Flashing Sheet metal Warranties Unknown Parapet Copings None Roof Drains Gutters and downspouts Fascia Metal Panel Insulation Fiberglass batts Soffits Exposed Soffits Skylights No Attics Yes Ponding No Ventilation Source-1 Power Vents Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 None Roof Condition Fair The primary roof is located over the majority of the building at the newer sections of the facility. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Asphalt shingles Actions/Comments:  The roof finishes are original. Information regarding roof warranties or bonds was not available.  According to the POC, there are no active roof leaks. There is no evidence of active roof leaks.  There is no evidence of roof deck or insulation deterioration. The roof substrate and insulation should be inspected during any future roof repair or replacement work.  Roof drainage appears to be adequate. Clearing and minor repair of drain system components should be performed regularly as part of the property management’s routine maintenance and operations program.  The attics are not accessible and it could not be determined if there is moisture, water intrusion, or excessive daylight in the attics.  The field of the roofs have curling and deteriorated shingles, primarily at the south side of the facility. Replacement of the entire roof is recommended. 6.4. Exterior Walls Building Exterior Walls Type Location Condition Primary Finish Vinyl siding Fair Secondary Finish Brick veneer Good Accented with None -- Soffits Exposed Fair Building sealants (caulking) are located between dissimilar materials, at joints, and around window and door openings. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Vinyl siding  Caulking  Masonry re-pointing CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 16 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  The vinyl siding has isolated areas of cracking and damage on the south side of the building near the condensing unit. The damaged finishes must be replaced. The cost for this work is relatively insignificant and can be accomplished through the City’s routine maintenance program. 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs Building Exterior and Interior Stairs Type Description Riser Handrail Balusters Condition Building Exterior Stairs Concrete stairs Closed Metal Metal Good Building Interior Stairs Steel-framed with pre-cast treads Closed Metal Metal Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors Building Windows Window Framing Glazing Location Window Screen Condition Aluminum framed storefront Double glaze Building exterior ☐ Fair Vinyl framed Double glaze Building exterior ☒ Fair Building Doors Main Entrance Doors Door Type Condition Fully glazed, metal framed Fair Secondary Entrance Doors Partially glazed, metal framed Fair Service Doors Metal, insulated Fair Overhead Doors Vinyl, sectional Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Storefront glazing  Exterior storefront doors  Overhead doors Actions/Comments:  There are a significant number of delaminated doors. The damaged doors must be refinished. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 17 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony Building Patio, Terrace and Balcony Type Description Location Condition Ground Floor Patio Pavers East elevation Fair Upper Balcony Structure None -- -- Balcony Decks None -- -- Balcony Deck Toppings None -- -- Balcony Guardrails None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 18 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems See the Mechanical Equipment List in the Appendices for the quantity, manufacturer’s name, model number, capacity and year of manufacturer of the major mechanical equipment, if available. 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Individual Units Primary Components Split system furnaces and condensing units Cooling (if separate from above) performed via components above Quantity and Capacity Ranges 8 furnaces ranging from 120 MBH to 135 MBH 9 condensing units ranging from 1 ton to 5 tons Total Heating or Cooling Capacity 1032 MBH 31 tons Heating Fuel Refrigerant Natural gas R-22 and R-134A Location of Equipment Furnaces in mechanical rooms Condensing units located adjacent to east wall Space Served by System Entire building Age Ranges Majority dated 2000 Primary Component Condition Fair to Poor Supplemental Components Supplemental Component #1 Split system condensing unit Location / Space Served Adjacent east wall/IT Room Condition Fair Supplemental Component #2 Electric wall heater Location / Space Served Entry vestibule Condition Fair Controls and Ventilation HVAC Control System Individual programmable thermostats/controls HVAC Control System Condition Fair Building Ventilation Roof top exhaust fans CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 19 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Controls and Ventilation Ventilation System Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Furnaces  Condensing units  Gas-fried unit heaters  Exhaust fans  Electric wall heaters Actions/Comments:  The HVAC systems are maintained by an outside contractor. It is unknown whether records of the installation, maintenance, upgrades, and replacement of the HVAC equipment at the property have been maintained.  Approximately 90 percent of the HVAC equipment is original. The HVAC equipment varies in age. HVAC equipment is replaced on an "as needed" basis.  The HVAC equipment appears to be not functioning adequately. The property management staff was interviewed about the historical and recent performance of the equipment and systems. The staff member reported that the system is zoned poorly and does not keep up with cooling loads. A budgetary cost for the upgrade or addition of supplementary components has been included in the report.  The existing component are generally in fair condition, however, due to the inevitable failure of parts and components over time, some of the equipment will require replacement. 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water Building Plumbing System Type Description Condition Water Supply Piping Copper Fair Waste/Sewer Piping PVC Fair Vent Piping PVC Fair Water Meter Location Basement mechanical room Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Components Water Heater Fuel Natural gas Quantity and Input Capacity 1 unit at 75,100 BTU/h Storage Capacity 70 gallons Boiler or Water Heater Condition Good Supplementary Storage Tanks? No Storage Tank Quantity & Volume None Quantity of Storage Tanks 0 Storage Tank Condition -- Domestic Hot Water Circulation Pumps (3 HP and over) No Adequacy of Hot Water Adequate CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 20 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Adequacy of Water Pressure Adequate Plumbing Fixtures Water Closets Commercial Toilet (Water Closet) Flush Rating 1.6 GPF Common Area Faucet Nominal Flow Rate 2.0 GPM Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Water heaters  Toilets  Urinals  Sinks  Ejector pumps  Eyewash station  Toilet stalls  Drinking fountains Actions/Comments:  The plumbing systems appear to be well maintained and functioning adequately. The water pressure appears to be sufficient. No significant repair actions or short term replacement costs are required. Routine and periodic maintenance is recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components or systems listed above will be required. 7.3. Building Gas Distribution Gas service is supplied from the gas main on the adjacent public street. The gas meter and regulator is located along the exterior wall of the building. The gas distribution piping within the building is malleable steel (black iron). Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The pressure and quantity of gas appear to be adequate.  The gas meter and regulator appear to be functioning adequately and will require routine maintenance.  Only limited observation of the gas distribution piping can be made due to hidden conditions. 7.4. Building Electrical Building Electrical Systems Electrical Lines Underground Transformer Pad-mounted Main Service Size 800 Amps Volts 120/208 Volt, three-phase CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 21 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Building Electrical Systems Meter & Panel Location Basement mechanical room Branch Wiring Copper Conduit Metallic Step-Down Transformers? No Security / Surveillance System? No Building Intercom System? No Lighting Fixtures T-8 Main Distribution Condition Good Secondary Panel and Transformer Condition Good Lighting Condition Fair Building Emergency System Size 125 kW Fuel Diesel Generator / UPS Serves Emergency lights, elevator Tank Location Integral Testing Frequency Bi-Weekly Tank Type Integral ("belly") tank Generator / UPS Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Circuit breaker panels  Main switchgear  Interior light fixtures  Emergency generator  Ceiling fans Actions/Comments:  The onsite electrical systems up to the meters are owned and maintained by the respective utility company.  The electrical service and capacity appear to be adequate for the property’s demands.  The switchgear and some panels are original 2000 components. The electrical service is reportedly adequate for the facility’s needs. However, due to the age of the panels and switchgear and increasing difficulty of obtaining replacement parts over time, lifecycle replacements are recommended per above. 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems Building Elevators Manufacturer Dover Machinery Location Ground floor or basement adjacent to shaft Safety Stops Electronic Emergency Equipment Yes Cab Floor Finish Vinyl-tiled Cab Wall Finish Plastic-laminated wood CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 22 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Building Elevators Hydraulic Elevators 1 car at 2500 lbs Overhead Traction Elevators None Freight Elevators None Machinery Condition Fair Controls Condition Fair Cab Finish Condition Fair Other Conveyances None Other Conveyance Condition NA Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Elevator controls  Hydraulic machinery Actions/Comments:  The elevators are serviced by Schindler Elevator Corp on a routine basis. The elevator machinery and controls are the originally installed system. The elevators will require continued periodic maintenance.  The elevators are inspected on an annual basis by the municipality, and a certificate of inspection is displayed in each elevator cab.  The emergency communication equipment in the elevator cabs appears to be functional. Equipment testing is not within the scope of the work.  The finishes in the elevator cabs will require replacement. The cost to replace the finishes is relatively insignificant and the work can be performed as part of the property management’s operations program. 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems Item Description Type Wet pipe Fire Alarm System Central Alarm Panel ☒ Battery-Operated Smoke Detectors ☐ Alarm Horns ☒ Annunciator Panels ☒ Hard-Wired Smoke Detectors ☒ Strobe Light Alarms ☒ Pull Stations ☒ Emergency Battery-Pack Lighting ☒ Illuminated EXIT Signs ☒ Alarm System Condition Fair Sprinkler System None ☐ Standpipes ☐ Backflow Preventer ☒ Hose Cabinets ☐ Fire Pumps ☐ Siamese Connections ☐ Suppression Condition Fair Central Alarm Panel System Location of Alarm Panel Installation Date of Alarm Panel Basement mechanical room 2000 CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 23 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Item Description Type Wet pipe Fire Extinguishers Last Service Date Servicing Current? March, 2017 Yes Hydrant Location Adjacent to building Siamese Location None Special Systems Kitchen Suppression System ☐ Computer Room Suppression System ☐ Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Central alarm panel  Exit signs  Backup light fixtures  Extinguishers  Automated external defibrillator Actions/Comments:  The majority of the building is not protected by fire suppression; sprinkler heads are currently limited to the files storage room in the basement near the mechanical room. Due to its construction date, the facility is most likely “grandfathered” by code and the installation of fire sprinklers not required until major renovations are performed. Regardless of when or if installation of facility-wide fire suppression is required by the governing municipality, EMG recommends a retrofit be performed. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 24 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 8. I nterior Spaces 8.1. I nterior Finishes All 18,988 square feet of the building are currently occupied by the City of Yorkville and is used as the city hall and police department. The spaces are mostly office areas. Other significant spaces include: the city council chambers and meeting rooms, and a police vehicle service bay. Other spaces include a combination of restrooms, mechanical spaces, storage areas, and other utility spaces. The following table generally describes the locations and typical conditions of the interior finishes within the facility: Typical Floor Finishes Floor Finish Locations General Condition Carpet Throughout building Fair Vinyl tile Throughout building, stairwells, miscellaneous spaces Fair Ceramic tile Restrooms Fair Quarry tile Entry vestibule Fair Concrete Sally port, storage areas Fair Typical Wall Finishes Wall Finish Locations General Condition Painted drywall Throughout building Fair Exposed CMU/masonry Basement mechanical room Fair Typical Ceiling Finishes Ceiling Finish Locations General Condition Suspended T-bar (Acoustic) Office spaces, basement areas Fair Painted drywall Council chambers, entry vestibule, sally port Fair Exposed structure Basement mechanical room Fair Interior Doors Item Type Condition Interior Doors Hollow core Solid core Fair Door Framing Wood Metal Fair Fire Doors Yes Fair CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 25 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Carpet  Vinyl tile  Interior paint  Suspended acoustic ceiling tile  Interior doors  Kitchenette cabinetry  Residential grade appliances Actions/Comments:  The interior areas were last renovated in 2015. The renovations consisted primarily of repainting.  The carpeting in the city hall area is rippling and in poor condition. Replacement of the carpeting in this area is recommended. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 26 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 9. Other Structures Not applicable. There are no major accessory structures. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 27 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 10. Certification The City of Yorkville retained EMG to perform this Facility Condition Assessment in connection with its continued operation of City Hall/Police Department, Yorkville, IL, the “Property”. It is our understanding that the primary interest of the City of Yorkville is to locate and evaluate materials and building system defects that might significantly affect the value of the property and to determine if the present Property has conditions that will have a significant impact on its continued operations. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the brief review of the plans and records made available to our Project Manager during the site visit, interviews of available property management personnel and maintenance contractors familiar with the Property, appropriate inquiry of municipal authorities, our Project Manager’s walk-through observations during the site visit, and our experience with similar properties. No testing, exploratory probing, dismantling or operating of equipment or in depth studies were performed unless specifically required under Section 2 of this report. This assessment did not include engineering calculations to determine the adequacy of the Property’s original design or existing systems. Although walk-through observations were performed, not all areas were observed (See Section 4.2 for areas observed). There may be defects in the Property, which were in areas not observed or readily accessible, may not have been visible, or were not disclosed by management personnel when questioned. The report describes property conditions at the time that the observations and research were conducted. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for the use of the City of Yorkville for the purpose stated within Section 2 of this report. The report, or any excerpt thereof, shall not be used by any party other than the City of Yorkville or for any other purpose than that specifically stated in our agreement or within Section 2 of this report without the express written consent of EMG. Any reuse or distribution of this report without such consent shall be at the City of Yorkville and the recipient’s sole risk, without liability to EMG. Prepared by: Kevin Koranda, Project Manager Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 28 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 11. Appendices Appendix A: Photographic Record Appendix B: Site Plan Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Appendix D: Pre-Survey Questionnaire CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix A: Photographic Record CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #1: COVER PHOTO PHOTO #2: FRONT ELEVATION PHOTO #3: NORTH ELEVATION PHOTO #4: NORTH ELEVATION PHOTO #5: EAST ELEVATION PHOTO #6: SOUTH ELEVATION CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #7: SITE IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE PHOTO #8: SIDEWALK PHOTO #9: CURB, DAMAGED PHOTO #10: SITE LIGHTING PHOTO #11: MAIN ENTRANCE RAMP PHOTO #12: RAMP WALL CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #13: STAIR WALL, SPALLING PHOTO #14: FRONT LOT, CRACKING AND DETERIORATED PHOTO #15: NORTHEAST LOT, CRACKING PHOTO #16: DUMPSTER AREA PHOTO #17: BUILDING LIGHTING PHOTO #18: BUILDING LIGHTING CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #19: EXTERIOR DOOR PHOTO #20: EXTERIOR DOOR PHOTO #21: MAIN ENTRANCE, DOOR OPENER PHOTO #22: SMALL BASEMENT WINDOW PHOTO #23: LARGE WINDOW PHOTO #24: PATIO AREA CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #25: ROOF PHOTO #26: ROOF, CURLING PHOTO #27: ROOF PHOTO #28: VINYL SIDING PHOTO #29: STAIRWELL PHOTO #30: STAIRWELL CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #31: GENERATOR PHOTO #32: CONDENSING UNITS PHOTO #33: DISTRIBUTION PANEL PHOTO #34: CIRCUIT BREAKERS PHOTO #35: MAIN MECHANICAL ROOM PHOTO #36: FURNACES CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #37: UNIT HEATER, SALLY PORT PHOTO #38: THERMOSTAT PHOTO #39: WALL MOUNTED ELECTRIC HEATER PHOTO #40: BACKUP LIGHT FIXTURE AND STROBE ALARM PHOTO #41: SMOKE DETECTOR PHOTO #42: EXIT SIGN CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #43: EXTINGUISHER PHOTO #44: RESTROOM PHOTO #45: URINAL PHOTO #46: TOILET PHOTO #47: LAVATORY SINKS PHOTO #48: BUILDING DEPARTMENT OFFICE AREA CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #49: STAIRS PHOTO #50: FIRE DOOR PHOTO #51: ENTRY VESTIBULE PHOTO #52: HALLWAY PHOTO #53: DRINKING FOUNTAINS PHOTO #54: COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #55: LIGHTING FIXTURES PHOTO #56: ACOUSTICAL TILE CEILING PHOTO #57: CARPET, RIPPLING PHOTO #58: KITCHENETTE PHOTO #59: SOLID CORE DOOR PHOTO #60: SALLY PORT CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #61: BATHROOM, POLICE AREA PHOTO #62: EYEWASH PHOTO #63: OFFICE, POLICE AREA PHOTO #64: OFFICE, POLICE AREA PHOTO #65: KITCHENETTE PHOTO #66: POLICE SERVICE DESK AND WAITING ROOM CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix B: Site Plan Site Plan Project Name: City Hall/Police Station Project Number: 122700.17R000-004.322 Source: Google Earth Pro On-Site Date: 5/18/2017 CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Page 1 of 4 Date Completed: 5/19/17 Property Name: City Hall/Police Station EMG Project Number: 122700.17R000-004.322 Building History Yes No Unk Comments 1 Has an ADA survey previously been completed for this property? ✔ 2 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? ✔ 3 Does a Transition Plan / Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? ✔ 4 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints that have not been resolved? ✔ 5 Is any litigation pending related to ADA issues? ✔ Parking Yes No NA Comments 1 Are there sufficient accessible parking spaces with respect to the total number of reported spaces? ✔ 2 Are there sufficient van-accessible parking spaces available? ✔ 3 Are accessible spaces marked with the International Symbol of Accessibility? Are there signs reading “Van Accessible” at van spaces? ✔ 4 Is there at least one accessible route provided within the boundary of the site from public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones, if provided, and public streets and sidewalks? ✔ 5 Do curbs on the accessible route have depressed, ramped curb cuts at drives, paths, and drop-offs? ✔ 6 If required does signage exist directing you to accessible parking and an accessible building entrance? ✔ Ramps Yes No NA Comments 1* Do all ramps along accessible path of travel appear to meet slope requirements? ( 1:12 or less) ✔ 2 Are ramps that appear longer than 6 ft complete with railings on both sides? ✔ Page 2 of 4 Ramps Yes No NA Comments 3 Does the width between railings appear at least 36 inches? ✔ 4 Is there a level landing for approximately every 30 ft horizontal length of ramp, at the top and at the bottom of ramps and switchbacks? ✔ Entrances/Exits Yes No NA Comments 1 Do all required accessible entrance doorways appear at least 32 inches wide and not a revolving door? ✔ 2 If the main entrance is inaccessible, are there alternate accessible entrances? ✔ 3 Is the door hardware easy to operate (lever/push type hardware, no twisting required and not higher than approximately 48 inches above the floor)? ✔ Paths of Travel Yes No NA Comments 1 Are all paths of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair (appear at least 36 inches wide)? ✔ 2 Are wheelchair-accessible facilities (toilet rooms, exits, etc.) identified with signage? ✔ 3 Is there a path of travel that does not require the use of stairs? ✔ Elevators Yes No NA Comments 1 Do the call buttons have visual and audible signals to indicate when a call is registered and answered when car arrives? ✔ 2 Are there visual and audible signals inside cars indicating floor change? ✔ 3 Are there standard raised and Braille marking on both jambs of each hoist way entrance as well as all cab/call buttons? ✔ 4 Do elevator doors have a reopening device that will stop and reopen a car door if an object or a person obstructs the door? ✔ 5 Are elevator controls low enough to be reached from a wheelchair (appears to be between 15 and 48 inches)? ✔ 6 If a two-way emergency communication system is provided within the elevator cab, is it usable without voice communication? ✔ Page 3 of 4 Toilet Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 Are common area public restrooms located on an accessible route? ✔ 2 Are pull handles push/pull or lever type? ✔ 3 Are there audible and visual fire alarm devices in the toilet rooms? ✔ 4 Are toilet room access doors wheelchair- accessible (appear to be at least 32 inches wide)? ✔ 5 Are public restrooms large enough to accommodate a wheelchair turnaround (appear to have 60” turning diameter)? ✔ 6 In unisex toilet rooms, are there safety alarms with pull cords? ✔ 7 Are toilet stall doors wheelchair accessible (appear to be at least 32” wide)? ✔ 8 Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? ✔ 9 Are sinks provided with clearance for a wheelchair to roll under (appear to have 29” clearance)? ✔ 10 Are sink handles operable with one hand without grasping, pinching or twisting? ✔ 11 Are exposed pipes under sink sufficiently insulated against contact? ✔ Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 How many total accessible sleeping rooms does the property management report to have? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible sleeping rooms with respect to the total number of reported guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. ✔ Page 4 of 4 Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 2 How many of the accessible sleeping rooms per property management have roll- in showers? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible rooms with roll-in showers with respect to the total number of reported accessible guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. ✔ 3 How many assistive listening kits and/or rooms with communication features are available per property management? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported assistive listening devices with respect to the total number of rooms? See attached hot sheet. ✔ Pools Yes No NA Comments 1 Are public access pools provided? If the answer is no, please disregard this section. ✔ 2 How many accessible access points are provided to each pool/spa? Provide number in comment field. Is at least one fixed lift or sloped entry to the pool provided? ✔ Play Area Yes No NA Comments 1 Has the play area been reviewed for accessibility? All public playgrounds are subject to ADAAG standards. ✔ Exercise Equipment Yes No NA Comments 1 Does there appear to be adequate clear floor space around the machines/equipment (30” by 48” minimum)? ✔ *Based on visual observation only. The slope was not confirmed through measurements. CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix D: Pre-Survey Questionnaire CITY HALL/POLICE DEPARTMENT EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-004.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 On the day of the site visit, provide EMG's Field Observer access to all of the available documents listed below. Provide copies if possible. INFORMATION REQUIRED 1. All available construction documents (blueprints) for the original construction of the building or for any tenant improvement work or other recent construction work. 2. A site plan, preferably 8 1/2" X 11", which depicts the arrangement of buildings, roads, parking stalls, and other site features. 3. For commercial properties, provide a tenant list which identifies the names of each tenant, vacant tenant units, the floor area of each tenant space, and the gross and net leasable area of the building(s). 4. For apartment properties, provide a summary of the apartment unit types and apartment unit type quantities, including the floor area of each apartment unit as measured in square feet. 5. For hotel or nursing home properties, provide a summary of the room types and room type quantities. 6. Copies of Certificates of Occupancy, building permits, fire or health department inspection reports, elevator inspection certificates, roof or HVAC warranties, or any other similar, relevant documents. 7. The names of the local utility companies which serve the property, including the water, sewer, electric, gas, and phone companies. 8. The company name, phone number, and contact person of all outside vendors who serve the property, such as mechanical contractors, roof contractors, fire sprinkler or fire extinguisher testing contractors, and elevator contractors. 9. A summary of recent (over the last 5 years) capital improvement work which describes the scope of the work and the estimated cost of the improvements. Executed contracts or proposals for improvements. Historical costs for repairs, improvements, and replacements. 10. Records of system & material ages (roof, MEP, paving, finishes, furnishings). 11. Any brochures or marketing information. 12. Appraisal, either current or previously prepared. 13. Current occupancy percentage and typical turnover rate records (for commercial and apartment properties). 14. Previous reports pertaining to the physical condition of property. 15. ADA survey and status of improvements implemented. 16. Current / pending litigation related to property condition. Your timely compliance with this request is greatly appreciated. Prepared for: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT Riverfront Rental Building 131 East Hydraulic Avenue Units A, B, C Yorkville, Illinois 60560 PREPARED BY: EMG CONTACT: EMG Andrew Hupp 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Senior Engineering Consultant Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 800.733.0660 x6632 800.733.0660 arhupp@emgcorp.com www.EMGcorp.com EMG Project Number: Date of Report: On Site Date: 122700.17R000-010.322 June 13, 2017 May 23, 2017 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT EMG Corporate Headquarters 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100, Owings Mills, MD 21117 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition ................................................................ 1 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations ...................................................................... 3 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Scope .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Personnel Interviewed ................................................................................................................. 6 2.4. Documentation Reviewed ........................................................................................................... 7 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire ........................................................................................................... 7 2.6. Weather Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 7 3. Accessibility and Property Research ................................................................................................. 8 3.1. ADA Accessibility ........................................................................................................................ 8 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone ................................................................ 8 4. Existing Building Assessment ............................................................................................................ 9 4.1. Unit or Space Types .................................................................................................................... 9 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed ...................................................................... 9 5. Site Improvements ............................................................................................................................. 10 5.1. Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 10 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks ................................................................................................ 10 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control .................................................................................... 11 5.4. Topography and Landscaping ................................................................................................... 12 5.5. General Site Improvements ....................................................................................................... 12 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems ............................................................................... 14 6.1. Foundations ............................................................................................................................... 14 6.2. Superstructure ........................................................................................................................... 14 6.3. Roofing ...................................................................................................................................... 14 6.4. Exterior Walls ............................................................................................................................ 16 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs ......................................................................................................... 16 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors ..................................................................................................... 16 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony ...................................................................................................... 17 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems .................................................................................. 18 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) ..................................................... 18 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water ............................................................................. 19 7.3. Building Gas Distribution ........................................................................................................... 20 7.4. Building Electrical ...................................................................................................................... 20 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems .............................................................................. 20 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems ....................................................................................... 21 7.7. Life Support Systems ................................................................................................................ 21 8. Interior Spaces .................................................................................................................................... 22 8.1. Interior Finishes ......................................................................................................................... 22 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment .............................................................................. 23 9. Other Structures ................................................................................................................................. 24 10. Certification ......................................................................................................................................... 25 11. Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 26 RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 1 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition The property information is summarized in the table below. More detailed descriptions may be found in the various sections of the report and in the Appendices. Property Information Address: 131 E Hydraulic Ave, Yorkville, Kendall, IL 60560 Year Constructed/Renovated: 1970 Current Occupants: Foxy’s Ice Cream Ginger + Soul Percent Utilization: 100% Management Point of Contact: City of Yorkville, Mr. Peter Ratos 630.553.8574 phone pratos@yorkville.il.us email Property Type: Retail Site Area: 0.07 acres Building Area: 2,152 SF Number of Buildings: 1 Number of Stories: 1 Parking Type and Number of Spaces: Parking available in public lot and on street. Public lot included in separate report. Building Construction: Conventional wood frame structure on concrete slab Roof Construction: Gabled roof with metal finish – Ginger + Soul Flat roof with built-up membrane – Foxy’s Ice Cream Exterior Finishes: Vinyl Siding – Ginger + Soul Painted CMU – Foxy’s Ice Cream Heating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning: Individual split-system units. Supplemental components: air curtain. Fire and Life/Safety: Hydrants, smoke detectors, extinguishers, exit signs, and emergency battery-powered lighting. Dates of Visit: May 23, 2017 On-Site Point of Contact (POC): Scott Sleezer Assessment and Report Prepared by: Paul Prusa Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 Systemic Condition Summary Site Fair HVAC Fair Structure Good Plumbing Fair RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 2 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Systemic Condition Summary Roof Excellent – Foxy’s Ice Cream Fair – Ginger + Soul Electrical Fair Vertical Envelope Fair Elevators -- Interiors Fair Fire -- The following bullet points highlight the most significant short term and modernization recommendations:  Replacement of furnace  Replacement of water heater  Installation of a complete fire suppression system  Installation of a complete fire alarm system Generally, the property appears to have been constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained in recent years and is in fair overall condition. According to property management personnel, the property has had a limited capital improvement expenditure program over the past three years, primarily consisting of painting, asphalt pavement seal coating, and roof finish replacement. Supporting documentation was not provided in support of these claims but some of the work is evident. 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate the FCI, which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. Two FCI ratios are calculated and presented, the Current Year and Ten-Year. The Current Year FCI is the ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to the building’s Current Replacement Value. Similarly, the Ten-Year FCI is the ratio of anticipated Capital Reserve Needs over the next ten years to the Current Replacement Value. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 3 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Fci Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value Good In new or well-maintained condition, with no visual evidence of wear, soiling or other deficiencies. 0% to 5% Fair Subjected to wear and soiling but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. > than 5% to 10% Poor Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. > than 10% to 60% Very Poor Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal is now necessary. > than 60% The graphs above and tables below represent summary-level findings for the FCA. The deficiencies identified in this assessment can be combined with potential new construction requirements to develop an overall strategy that can serve as the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy. Key findings from the assessment include: Key Finding Metric Current Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (IR)/(CRV) 5.4% Fair 10-Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (RR)/(CRV) 20.6% Poor Current Replacement Value (CRV) 2,152 SF * 183.24 / SF = $394,326 Year 0 (Current Year) - Immediate Repairs (IR) $21,625 Years 1-10 – Replacement Reserves (RR) $81,566 Total Capital Needs $103,191 The major issues contributing to the Immediate Repair Costs and the Current Year FCI ratio are summarized below:  Installation of a complete fire suppression system  Installation of a complete fire alarm system Further detail on the specific costs that make up the Immediate Repair Costs can be found in the cost tables at the beginning of this report. 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations As part of the FCA, a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) was performed to determine the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. Property personnel were interviewed concerning any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Sampling is not a part of this assessment. There are no visual indications of the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, or evidence of moisture in representative readily accessible areas of the property. 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost Cost estimates are attached at the front of this report (following the cover page). These estimates are based on Invoice or Bid Document/s provided either by the Owner/facility and construction costs developed by construction resources such as R.S. Means and Marshall & Swift, EMG’s experience with past costs for similar properties, city cost indexes, and assumptions regarding future economic conditions. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 4 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary, order of magnitude budgets. Actual costs most probably will vary from the consultant’s opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy, quality of materials and installation, manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected, field conditions, whether a physical deficiency is repaired or replaced in whole, phasing of the work (if applicable), quality of contractor, quality of project management exercised, market conditions, and whether competitive pricing is solicited, etc. ASTM E2018-08 recognizes that certain opinions of probable costs cannot be developed within the scope of this guide without further study. Opinions of probable cost for further study should be included in the FCA. 1.4.1. Methodology Based upon site observations, research, and judgment, along with referencing Expected Useful Life (EUL) tables from various industry sources, EMG opines as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement. Accurate historical replacement records, if provided, are typically the best source of information. Exposure to the elements, initial quality and installation, extent of use, the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised, etc., are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component. As a result, a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual chronological age. The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age. Projections of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) are based on continued use of the Property similar to the reported past use. Significant changes in occupants and/or usage may affect the service life of some systems or components. Where quantities could not be derived from an actual take-off, lump sum costs or allowances are used. Estimated costs are based on professional judgment and the probable or actual extent of the observed defect, inclusive of the cost to design, procure, construct and manage the corrections. 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs Immediate repairs are opinions of probable costs that require immediate action as a result of: (1) material existing or potential unsafe conditions, (2) material building or fire code violations, or (3) conditions that, if not addressed, have the potential to result in, or contribute to, critical element or system failure within one year or will most probably result in a significant escalation of its remedial cost. 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves Replacement Reserves are for recurring probable expenditures, which are not classified as operation or maintenance expenses. The replacement reserves should be budgeted for in advance on an annual basis. Replacement Reserves are reasonably predictable both in terms of frequency and cost. However, Replacement Reserves may also include components or systems that have an indeterminable life but, nonetheless, have a potential for failure within an estimated time period. Replacement Reserves exclude systems or components that are estimated to expire after the reserve term and are not considered material to the structural and mechanical integrity of the subject property. Furthermore, systems and components that are not deemed to have a material effect on the use of the Property are also excluded. Costs that are caused by acts of God, accidents, or other occurrences that are typically covered by insurance, rather than reserved for, are also excluded. Replacement costs are solicited from ownership/property management, EMG’s discussions with service companies, manufacturers' representatives, and previous experience in preparing such schedules for other similar facilities. Costs for work performed by the ownership’s or property management’s maintenance staff are also considered. EMG’s reserve methodology involves identification and quantification of those systems or components requiring capital reserve funds within the assessment period. The assessment period is defined as the effective age plus the reserve term. Additional information concerning system’s or component’s respective replacement costs (in today's dollars), typical expected useful lives, and remaining useful lives were estimated so that a funding schedule could be prepared. The Replacement Reserves Schedule presupposes that all required remedial work has been performed or that monies for remediation have been budgeted for items defined in the Immediate Repair Cost Estimate. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 5 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2. Purpose and Scope 2.1. Purpose EMG was retained by the client to render an opinion as to the Property’s current general physical condition on the day of the site visit. Based on the observations, interviews and document review outlined below, this report identifies significant deferred maintenance issues, existing deficiencies, and material code violations of record at municipal offices, which affect the Property’s use. Opinions are rendered as to its structural integrity, building system condition and the Property’s overall condition. The report also notes building systems or components that have realized or exceeded their typical expected useful lives. CONDITIONS: The physical condition of building systems and related components are typically defined as being in one of five conditions: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Failed or a combination thereof. For the purposes of this report, the following definitions are used: Excellent = New or very close to new; component or system typically has been installed within the past year, sound and performing its function. Eventual repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Good = Satisfactory as-is. Component or system is sound and performing its function, typically within the first third of its lifecycle. However, it may show minor signs of normal wear and tear. Repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Fair = Showing signs of wear and use but still satisfactory as-is, typically near the median of its estimated useful life. Component or system is performing adequately at this time but may exhibit some signs of wear, deferred maintenance, or evidence of previous repairs. Repair or replacement will be required due to the component or system’s condition and/or its estimated remaining useful life. Poor = Component or system is significantly aged, flawed, functioning intermittently or unreliably; displays obvious signs of deferred maintenance; shows evidence of previous repair or workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards; has become obsolete; or exhibits an inherent deficiency. The present condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of contiguous elements or systems. Either full component replacement is needed or repairs are required to restore to good condition, prevent premature failure, and/or prolong useful life. Failed = Component or system has ceased functioning or performing as intended. Replacement, repair, or other significant corrective action is recommended or required. Not Applicable = Assigning a condition does not apply or make logical sense, most commonly due to the item in question not being present. Throughout sections 5 through 9 of this report, each report section will typically contain three subsections organized in the following sequence:  A descriptive table (and/or narrative), which identifies the components assessed, their condition, and other key data points.  A simple bulleted list of Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements, which lists components and assets typically in Excellent, Good, or Fair condition at the time of the assessment but that will require replacement or some other attention once aged past their estimated useful life. These listed components are typically included in the associated inventory database with costs identified and budgeted beyond the first several years.  A bulleted cluster of Actions/Comments, which include more detailed narratives describing deficiencies, recommended repairs, and short term replacements. The assets and components associated with these bullets are/were typically problematic and in Poor or Failed condition at the time of the assessment, with corresponding costs included within the first few years. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 6 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PLAN TYPES: Each line item in the cost database is assigned a Plan Type, which is the primary reason or rationale for the recommended replacement, repair, or other corrective action. This is the “why” part of the equation. A cost or line item may commonly have more than one applicable Plan Type; however, only one Plan Type will be assigned based on the “best” fit, typically the one with the greatest significance. The following Plan Types are listed in general weighted order of importance: Safety = An observed or reported unsafe condition that if left unaddressed could result in an injury; a system or component that presents a potential liability risk. Performance/Integrity = Component or system has failed, is almost failing, performs unreliably, does not perform as intended, and/or poses a risk to overall system stability. Accessibility = Does not meet ADA, UFAS, and/or other handicap accessibility requirements. Environmental = Improvements to air or water quality, including removal of hazardous materials from the building or site. Modernization/Adaptation = Conditions, systems, or spaces that need to be upgraded in appearance or function to meet current standards, facility usage, or client/occupant needs. Lifecycle/Renewal = Any component or system in which future repair or replacement is anticipated beyond the next several years and/or is of minimal substantial early-term consequence. 2.2. Scope The standard scope of the Facility Condition Assessment includes the following:  Visit the Property to evaluate the general condition of the building and site improvements, review available construction documents in order to familiarize ourselves with, and be able to comment on, the in-place construction systems, life safety, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and the general built environment.  Identify those components that are exhibiting deferred maintenance issues and provide cost estimates for Immediate Costs and Replacement Reserves based on observed conditions, maintenance history and industry standard useful life estimates. This will include the review of documented capital improvements completed within the last five-year period and work currently contracted for, if applicable.  Provide a full description of the Property with descriptions of in-place systems and commentary on observed conditions.  Provide a general statement of the subject Property’s compliance to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This will not constitute a full ADA survey, but will help identify exposure to issues and the need for further review.  Perform a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) for the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. EMG will also interview Project personnel regarding the presence of any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Potentially affected areas will be photographed. Sampling will not be considered in routine assessments.  List the current utility service providers.  Review maintenance records and procedures with the in-place maintenance personnel.  Observe a representative sample of the interior spaces/units, including vacant spaces/units, in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas to be observed include the exterior of the property, the roofs, interior common areas, and the significant mechanical, electrical and elevator equipment rooms.  Provide an Executive Summary at the beginning of this report.  Prepare a mechanical equipment inventory list. 2.3. Personnel Interviewed The building engineer was interviewed for specific information relating to the physical property, available maintenance procedures, historical performance of key building systems and components, available drawings and other documentation. The following personnel from the facility and government agencies were interviewed in the process of conducting the FCA: Name and Title Organization Phone Number Scott Sleezer Parks and Recreation 630.878.7291 RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 7 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 The FCA was performed with the assistance of Scott Sleezer, Yorkville Parks and Recreation, the onsite Point of Contact (POC), who was cooperative and provided information that appeared to be accurate based upon subsequent site observations. The onsite contact is completely knowledgeable about the subject property and answered most questions posed during the interview process. The POC’s management involvement at the property has been for the past 26 years. 2.4. Documentation Reviewed Prior to the FCA, relevant documentation was requested that could aid in the knowledge of the subject property’s physical improvements, extent and type of use, and/or assist in identifying material discrepancies between reported information and observed conditions. The review of submitted documents does not include comment on the accuracy of such documents or their preparation, methodology, or protocol. The Documentation Request Form is provided in Appendix E. 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire A Pre-Survey Questionnaire was sent to the POC prior to the site visit and was not returned. The questionnaire is included in Appendix E. 2.6. Weather Conditions May 23, 2017: Raining, with temperatures in the 70s (°F) and light winds. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 8 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 3. Accessibility and Property Research 3.1. ADA Accessibility Generally, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by entities to access and use of “areas of public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” on the basis of disability. Regardless of its age, these areas and facilities must be maintained and operated to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). Buildings completed and occupied after January 26, 1992 are required to comply fully with the ADAAG. Existing facilities constructed prior to this date are held to the lesser standard of compliance to the extent allowed by structural feasibility and the financial resources available. As an alternative, a reasonable accommodation pertaining to the deficiency must be made. During the FCA, a limited visual observation for ADA accessibility compliance was conducted. The scope of the visual observation was limited to those areas set forth in EMG’s Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist provided in Appendix D of this report. It is understood by the Client that the limited observations described herein does not comprise a full ADA Compliance Survey, and that such a survey is beyond the scope of EMG’s undertaking. Only a representative sample of areas was observed and, other than as shown on the Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist, actual measurements were not taken to verify compliance. At a retail property, the areas considered as a public accommodation besides the site itself and parking, are the exterior accessible route, the interior accessible route up to the tenant lease lines and the interior common areas, including the common area restrooms. The facility does not appear to be accessible with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Elements as defined by the ADAAG that are not accessible as stated within the priorities of Title III, are as follows: Restrooms  Wrap drain pipes below lavatory with insulation; protect against contact with hot, sharp, or abrasive surfaces. A full ADA Compliance Survey may reveal additional aspects of the property that are not in compliance. Corrections of these conditions should be addressed from a liability standpoint, but are not necessarily code violations. The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines concern civil rights issues as they pertain to the disabled and are not a construction code, although many local jurisdictions have adopted the Guidelines as such. The cost to address the achievable items noted above is included in the cost tables. 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone Not Applicable. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 9 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 4. Existing Building Assessment 4.1. Unit or Space Types All 2,152 square feet of the building are occupied by a multiple occupants, Foxy’s Ice Cream and Ginger + Soul. The building is owned and maintained by the City of Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department. The spaces are a combination of kitchens, dining areas, supporting restrooms, mechanical, and other utility spaces. The following table identifies the reported unit types and mix at the subject property. Unit Types and Mix Quantity Type Floor Area (Sf) 1 Ginger + Soul 1,440 1 Foxy’s Ice Cream 625 1 Shared Mechanical Space 87 TOTAL 2,152 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed The interior spaces were observed in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas accessed included the site within the property boundaries, exterior of the property, and the roof. All areas of the property were available for observation during the site visit. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 10 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 5. Site Improvements 5.1. Utilities The following table identifies the utility suppliers and the condition and adequacy of the services. Site Utilities Utility Supplier Condition and Adequacy Sanitary sewer City of Yorkville Good Storm sewer City of Yorkville Good Domestic water City of Yorkville Good Electric service Commonwealth Edison Good Natural gas service Nicor Gas Good Actions/Comments:  According to the POC, the utilities provided are adequate for the property. There are no unique, onsite utility systems such as emergency electrical generators, septic systems, water or waste water treatment plants, or propane gas tanks. 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks Item Description Main Ingress and Egress Hydraulic Ave Access from South Additional Entrances -- Additional Access from -- Paving and Flatwork Item Material Last Work Done Condition Entrance Driveway Apron -- -- -- Parking Lot -- -- -- Drive Aisles -- -- -- Service Aisles -- -- -- Sidewalks -- -- -- Curbs -- -- -- Site Stairs -- -- -- Pedestrian Ramps -- -- -- RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 11 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Parking Count Open Lot Carport Private Garage Subterranean Garage Freestanding Parking Structure -- -- -- -- -- Total Number of ADA Compliant Spaces 0 Number of ADA Compliant Spaces for Vans 0 Total Parking Spaces Utilizes Public Lot Parking Ratio (Spaces/Apartments) -- Method of Obtaining Parking Count -- Exterior Stairs Location Material Handrails Condition None -- -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control Drainage System and Erosion Control System Exists At Site Condition Surface Flow ☒ Good Inlets ☐ -- Swales ☐ -- Detention pond ☐ -- Lagoons ☐ -- Ponds ☐ -- Underground Piping ☐ -- Pits ☐ -- Municipal System ☐ -- Dry Well ☐ -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 12 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  There is no evidence of storm water runoff from adjacent properties. The storm water system appears to provide adequate runoff capacity. There is no evidence of major ponding or erosion. 5.4. Topography and Landscaping Item Description Site Topography Generally flat Landscaping Trees Grass Flower Beds Planters Drought Tolerant Plants Decorative Stone None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Landscaping Condition -- Irrigation Automatic Underground Drip Hand Watering None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Irrigation Condition -- Retaining Walls Type Location Condition None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The topography and adjacent uses do not appear to present conditions detrimental to the property. There are no significant areas of erosion. 5.5. General Site Improvements Property Signage Property Signage Building mounted Street Address Displayed? Yes Site and Building Lighting Site Lighting None Pole Mounted Bollard Lights Ground Mounted Parking Lot Pole Type ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ -- RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 13 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Site and Building Lighting Building Lighting None Wall Mounted Recessed Soffit ☐ ☒ ☐ Good – Foxy’s Ice Cream Fair – Ginger + Soul Site Fencing Type Location Condition None -- -- REFUSE DISPOSAL Refuse Disposal Common area dumpsters Dumpster Locations Mounting Enclosure Contracted? Condition Public Lot Asphalt paving Wood board fence Yes Excellent Other Site Amenities Description Location Condition Playground Equipment None -- -- Tennis Courts None -- -- Basketball Court None -- -- Swimming Pool None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Exterior lighting Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 14 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems 6.1. Foundations Building Foundation Item Description Condition Foundation Slab on grade with integral footings Good Basement and Crawl Space None -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The foundation systems are concealed. There are no significant signs of settlement, deflection, or movement. 6.2. Superstructure Building Superstructure Item Description Condition Framing / Load-Bearing Walls Conventional wood/metal studs Good Ground Floor Concrete slab Good Upper Floor Framing -- -- Upper Floor Decking -- -- Roof Framing Wood trusses Good Roof Decking Plywood or OSB Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The superstructure is exposed in some locations, which allows for limited observation. Walls and floors appear to be plumb, level, and stable. There are no significant signs of deflection or movement. 6.3. Roofing Primary Roof Type / Geometry Flat Finish Modified Bituminous Maintenance Outside Contractor Roof Age 0 Yrs Flashing Membrane Warranties Yes RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 15 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Primary Roof Parapet Copings Parapet with sheet metal coping Roof Drains Gutters and downspouts Fascia Metal Panel Insulation Rigid Board Soffits Concealed Soffits Skylights No Attics -- Ponding No Ventilation Source-1 Turtle Vents Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 -- Roof Condition Excellent The primary roof is located at Foxy’s Ice Cream and Share Mechanical Space. Secondary Roof Type / Geometry Gable Roof Finish Metal Maintenance Outside Contractor Roof Age Approximately 20 Yrs Flashing Membrane Warranties No Parapet Copings None Roof Drains Gutters and downspouts Fascia Metal Panel Insulation Fiberglass batts Soffits None Skylights No Attics Wood joists with plywood sheathing Ponding No Ventilation Source-1 Ridge Vents Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 -- Roof Condition Fair The secondary roof is located at Ginger + Soul. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Metal roofing  Modified bituminous membrane  Roof flashings (included as part of overall membrane replacement)  Parapet wall copings (included as part of overall membrane replacement) Actions/Comments:  The roof finishes vary in age. Information regarding roof warranties or bonds was not available. The roofs are maintained by an outside contractor.  According to the POC, there are no active roof leaks. There is no evidence of active roof leaks.  There is no evidence of roof deck or insulation deterioration. The roof substrate and insulation should be inspected during any future roof repair or replacement work.  Roof drainage appears to be adequate. Clearing and minor repair of drain system components should be performed regularly as part of the property management’s routine maintenance and operations program.  The attics are not accessible and it could not be determined if there is moisture, water intrusion, or excessive daylight in the attics. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 16 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6.4. Exterior Walls Foxy’s Ice Cream Building Exterior Walls Type Location Condition Primary Finish Painted CMU Good Secondary Finish -- -- Accented with Wood siding Fair Soffits Concealed Fair Ginger + Soul Building Exterior Walls Type Location Condition Primary Finish Vinyl siding Fair Secondary Finish -- -- Accented with -- -- Soffits -- -- Building sealants (caulking) are located between dissimilar materials, at joints, and around window and door openings. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Exterior paint  Vinyl siding Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance, including patching repairs, graffiti removal, and re-caulking, is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs Not applicable. There are no exterior or interior stairs. 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors Building Windows Window Framing Glazing Location Window Screen Condition Vinyl framed, operable Double glaze Foxy’s Ice Cream ☐ Fair Aluminum framed, fixed Double glaze Ginger + Soul ☐ Fair RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 17 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Building Doors Main Entrance Doors Door Type Condition Glazed, metal framed Good Secondary Entrance Doors -- -- Service Doors -- -- Overhead Doors -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Windows  Exterior glazed metal doors Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony Building Patio, Terrace and Balcony Type Description Location Condition Ground Floor Patio Asphalt Rear – Ginger + Soul Front – Foxy’s Ice Cream Poor Excellent Upper Balcony Structure -- -- -- Balcony Decks -- -- -- Balcony Deck Toppings -- -- -- Balcony Guardrails -- -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Seal coating of asphalt pavement Actions/Comments:  The rear patio asphalt must be seal coated in order to maintain the integrity of the overall pavement system. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 18 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems See the Mechanical Equipment List in the Appendices for the quantity, manufacturer’s name, model number, capacity and year of manufacturer of the major mechanical equipment, if available. 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Individual Units Primary Components Split system furnaces and condensing units Cooling (if separate from above) performed via components above Quantity and Capacity Ranges 2 units at 2.5 tons each Total Heating or Cooling Capacity 5 tons Heating Fuel Natural gas Location of Equipment Building exterior Space Served by System Entire building Age Ranges 2016 – Foxy’s Ice Cream 2006 – Ginger + Soul Primary Component Condition Excellent – Foxy’s Ice Cream Fair – Ginger + Soul Supplemental Components Supplemental Component #1 Air Curtain Location / Space Served by Air Curtain Foxy’s Ice Cream kitchen area Air Curtain Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Split system furnaces and condensing units  Air curtain Actions/Comments:  The HVAC systems are maintained by the in-house maintenance staff.  The HVAC equipment varies in age. HVAC equipment is replaced on an "as needed" basis.  The HVAC equipment appears to be functioning adequately overall. The engineering staff was interviewed about the historical and recent performance of the equipment and systems. No chronic problems were reported and an overall sense of satisfaction with the systems was conveyed. However, due to the inevitable failure of parts and components over time, some of the equipment will require replacement. A budgetary cost for this work is included. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 19 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water Building Plumbing System Type Description Condition Water Supply Piping Copper Fair Waste/Sewer Piping PVC Fair Vent Piping PVC Fair Water Meter Location Shared Space Mechanical Room Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Components Water Heaters Fuel Electric Quantity and Input Capacity 2 units 4,500 W – Ginger + Soul Inaccessible – Foxy’s Ice Cream Storage Capacity 50 gallons – Ginger + Soul Approximately 40 gallons – Foxy’s Ice Cream Boiler or Water Heater Condition Excellent – Ginger + Soul Poor – Foxy’s Ice Cream Supplementary Storage Tanks? No Storage Tank Quantity & Volume -- Quantity of Storage Tanks -- Storage Tank Condition -- Domestic Hot Water Circulation Pumps (3 HP and over) No Adequacy of Hot Water Adequate Adequacy of Water Pressure Adequate Plumbing Fixtures Water Closets Residential grade Toilet (Water Closet) Flush Rating 1,6 GPF Common Area Faucet Nominal Flow Rate 2.0 GPM Condition Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Water heaters  Toilets  Sinks  Lavatories RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 20 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  The plumbing systems appear to be well maintained and functioning adequately. The water pressure appears to be sufficient. No significant repair actions or short term replacement costs are required. Routine and periodic maintenance is recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components or systems listed above will be required. 7.3. Building Gas Distribution Gas service is supplied from the gas main on the adjacent public street. The gas meter and regulator are located along the exterior walls of the buildings. The gas distribution piping within each building is malleable steel (black iron). Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The pressure and quantity of gas appear to be adequate.  The gas meter and regulator appear to be functioning adequately and will require routine maintenance.  Only limited observation of the gas distribution piping can be made due to hidden conditions. 7.4. Building Electrical Building Electrical Systems Electrical Lines Overhead Transformer Pole-mounted Main Service Size (2) 200 Amps Volts 120/240 Volt, single-phase Meter & Panel Location West side Branch Wiring Copper Conduit Metallic Step-Down Transformers? No Security / Surveillance System? Yes Building Intercom System? No Lighting Fixtures T-8 Main Distribution Condition Fair Secondary Panel and Transformer Condition -- Lighting Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Circuit breaker panels  Interior light fixtures Actions/Comments:  The onsite electrical systems up to the meters are owned and maintained by the respective utility company.  The electrical service and capacity appear to be adequate for the property’s demands.  The panels are mostly original 1970 components. The electrical service is reportedly adequate for the facility’s needs. However, due to the age of the panels and increasing difficulty of obtaining replacement parts over time, lifecycle replacements are recommended per above. 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems Not applicable. There are no elevators or conveying systems. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 21 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems Item Description Type None Fire Alarm System Central Alarm Panel ☐ Battery-Operated Smoke Detectors ☒ Alarm Horns ☐ Annunciator Panels ☐ Hard-Wired Smoke Detectors ☐ Strobe Light Alarms ☐ Pull Stations ☐ Emergency Battery-Pack Lighting ☒ Illuminated EXIT Signs ☒ Alarm System Condition -- Sprinkler System None ☒ Standpipes ☐ Backflow Preventer ☐ Hose Cabinets ☐ Fire Pumps ☐ Siamese Connections ☐ Suppression Condition -- Central Alarm Panel System Location of Alarm Panel Installation Date of Alarm Panel -- -- Fire Extinguishers Last Service Date Servicing Current? 08/2015 & 03/2017 No Hydrant Location Hydraulic Avenue Siamese Location -- Special Systems Kitchen Suppression System ☐Computer Room Suppression System ☐ Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Central alarm panel  Alarm devices and system  Sprinkler heads Actions/Comments: The building is not protected by fire suppression. Due to its construction date, the facility is most likely “grandfathered” by code and the installation of fire sprinklers not required until major renovations are performed. Regardless of when or if installation of facility-wide fire suppression is required by the governing municipality, EMG recommends a retrofit be performed. A budgetary cost is included.  The fire alarm systems appear limited to locally alarmed devices. There is a lack of strobes, audio alarms, insufficient pull stations, and system alarms locally only. Due to the age of the components and apparent shortcomings, a full modernization project is recommended. A budgetary cost is included. 7.7. Life Support Systems Not Applicable. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 22 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 8. Interior Spaces 8.1. Interior Finishes The facility is used as a restaurant and ice cream shop. The most significant interior spaces include dining areas and kitchens. Supporting areas include hallways, restrooms, and back-of-house areas. The following table generally describes the locations and typical conditions of the interior finishes within the facility: Typical Floor Finishes Floor Finish Locations General Condition Vinyl tile Ginger + Soul kitchen, Foxy’s Ice Cream Fair Ceramic tile Ginger + Soul corridor and restrooms Good Painted/sealed concrete Ginger + Soul dining area Fair Wood strip Ginger + Soul dining area Good Typical Wall Finishes Wall Finish Locations General Condition Painted CMU Foxy’s Ice Cream Fair Painted drywall Ginger + Soul Fair Typical Ceiling Finishes Ceiling Finish Locations General Condition Suspended T-bar (Acoustic) Foxy’s Ice Cream kitchen, throughout Ginger + Soul Fair Exposed painted structure Foxy’s Ice Cream dining area Fair Exposed structure Shared space mechanical room Fair Interior Doors Item Type Condition Interior Doors Hollow core wood Fully glazed wood Solid core metal Fair Door Framing Wood Fair Fire Doors No -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Vinyl tile  Ceramic tile  Interior paint  Suspended acoustic ceiling tile RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 23 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660  Interior doors Actions/Comments:  It appears that the interior finishes have been renovated at different time.  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment Not applicable. Commercial kitchen equipment is owned and maintained by the tenant. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 24 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 9. Other Structures Not applicable. There are no major accessory structures. RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 25 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 10. Certification City of Yorkville retained EMG to perform this Facility Condition Assessment in connection with its continued operation of Riverfront Rental Building, 131 East Hydraulic Avenue, Yorkville, Illinois, the “Property”. It is our understanding that the primary interest of City of Yorkville is to locate and evaluate materials and building system defects that might significantly affect the value of the property and to determine if the present Property has conditions that will have a significant impact on its continued operations. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the brief review of the plans and records made available to our Project Manager during the site visit, interviews of available property management personnel and maintenance contractors familiar with the Property, appropriate inquiry of municipal authorities, our Project Manager’s walk-through observations during the site visit, and our experience with similar properties. No testing, exploratory probing, dismantling or operating of equipment or in depth studies were performed unless specifically required under Section 2 of this report. This assessment did not include engineering calculations to determine the adequacy of the Property’s original design or existing systems. Although walk-through observations were performed, not all areas were observed (See Section 4.2 for areas observed). There may be defects in the Property, which were in areas not observed or readily accessible, may not have been visible, or were not disclosed by management personnel when questioned. The report describes property conditions at the time that the observations and research were conducted. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for the use of City of Yorkville for the purpose stated within Section 2 of this report. The report, or any excerpt thereof, shall not be used by any party other than City of Yorkville or for any other purpose than that specifically stated in our agreement or within Section 2 of this report without the express written consent of EMG. Any reuse or distribution of this report without such consent shall be at City of Yorkville and the recipient’s sole risk, without liability to EMG. Prepared by: Paul Prusa P.E., LEED AP, Project Manager Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 26 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 11. Appendices Appendix A: Photographic Record Appendix B: Site Plan Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix A: Photographic Record RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING 131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #1: REAR ELEVATION - GINGER + SOUL #2: FRONT ELEVATION - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #3: LEFT ELEVATION - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #4: RIGHT ELEVATION - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #5: RIGHT ELEVATION - GINGER + SOUL #6: FRONT ELEVATION - GINGER + SOUL RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING 131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #7: ADA, RESTROOM, LAVATORY PIPE WRAPS #8: ROOF, METAL #9: ROOF, MODIFIED BITUMINOUS #10: DAMAGED DOWNSPOUT #11: EXTERIOR WALL, PAINTED SURFACE #12: EXTERIOR WALL, VINYL SIDING RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING 131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #13: WINDOW, VINYL-CLAD DOUBLE- GLAZED 12 SF #14: WINDOW, VINYL-CLAD DOUBLE- GLAZED 6 SF #15: WINDOW, ALUMINUM DOUBLE- GLAZED #16: EXTERIOR DOOR, STEEL W/ GLASS - GINGER + SOUL #17: EXTERIOR DOOR, STEEL W/ GLASS - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #18: PEDESTRIAN PAVEMENT, ASPHALT - GINGER + SOUL RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING 131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #19: PEDESTRIAN PAVEMENT, ASPHALT - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #20: AIR CURTAIN #21: CONDENSING UNIT - GINGER + SOUL #22: CONDENSING UNIT - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #23: FURNACE, GAS - GINGER + SOUL #24: FURNACE, GAS - FOXY'S ICE CREAM RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING 131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #25: WATER HEATER, ELECTRIC - GINGER + SOUL #26: WATER HEATER, ELECTRIC - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #27: SINK, STAINLESS STEEL - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #28: SINK, POT, MULTI- COMPARTMENT - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #29: LAVATORY, VITREOUS CHINA #30: TOILET, FLUSH TANK (WATER CLOSET) RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING 131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #31: SINK, POT, MULTI- COMPARTMENT - GINGER + SOUL #32: SINK, PLASTIC #33: LIGHTING SYSTEM, INTERIOR - GINGER + SOUL #34: LIGHTING SYSTEM, INTERIOR - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #35: MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #36: MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL - GINGER + SOUL RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING 131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #37: INCANDESCENT LIGHTING FIXTURE, BASIC #38: LED LIGHTING FIXTURE, BASIC #39: FLOOD LIGHT, EXTERIOR #40: EMERGENCY/EXIT COMBO #41: FIRE EXTINGUISHER #42: EXIT LIGHTING FIXTURE RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING 131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #43: CAMERA, SECURITY SYSTEM - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #44: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, GYPSUM BOARD - GINGER + SOUL #45: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, CONCRETE/MASONRY - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #46: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, PAINTED STRUCTURE - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #47: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, ACOUSTICAL TILE (ACT) - GINGER + SOUL #48: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, (ACT) DROPPED FIBERGLASS - GINGER + SOUL RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING 131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #49: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, ACOUSTICAL TILE (ACT) - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #50: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, CERAMIC TILE - GINGER + SOUL #51: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, VINYL TILE (VCT) - GINGER + SOUL #52: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, VINYL TILE (VCT) - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #53: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, WOOD STRIP - GINGER + SOUL #54: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, CONCRETE - GINGER + SOUL RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING 131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #55: INTERIOR DOOR, WOOD HOLLOW-CORE - GINGER + SOUL #56: INTERIOR DOOR, GLAZED WOOD - GINGER + SOUL #57: INTERIOR DOOR, STEEL - FOXY'S ICE CREAM #58: INTERIOR DOOR, WOOD HOLLOW-CORE - FOXY'S ICE CREAM RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix B: Site Plan Site Plan Project Name: Riverfront Rental Building Project Number: 122700.17R000-010.322 Source: Google Maps On-Site Date: May 23, 2017 RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Page 1 of 4 Date Completed: June 7, 2017 Property Name: Riverfront Rental Building EMG Project Number: 122700.17R000-010.322 Building History Yes No Unk Comments 1 Has an ADA survey previously been completed for this property? X 2 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? X 3 Does a Transition Plan / Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? X 4 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints that have not been resolved? X 5 Is any litigation pending related to ADA issues? X Parking Yes No NA Comments 1 Are there sufficient accessible parking spaces with respect to the total number of reported spaces? X Parking is provided via a public lot (included in separate report) and street parking. 2 Are there sufficient van-accessible parking spaces available? X 3 Are accessible spaces marked with the International Symbol of Accessibility? Are there signs reading “Van Accessible” at van spaces? X 4 Is there at least one accessible route provided within the boundary of the site from public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones, if provided, and public streets and sidewalks? X 5 Do curbs on the accessible route have depressed, ramped curb cuts at drives, paths, and drop-offs? X 6 If required does signage exist directing you to accessible parking and an accessible building entrance? X Ramps Yes No NA Comments 1* Do all ramps along accessible path of travel appear to meet slope requirements? ( 1:12 or less) X 2 Are ramps that appear longer than 6 ft complete with railings on both sides? X 3 Does the width between railings appear at least 36 inches? X Page 2 of 4 Ramps Yes No NA Comments 4 Is there a level landing for approximately every 30 ft horizontal length of ramp, at the top and at the bottom of ramps and switchbacks? X Entrances/Exits Yes No NA Comments 1 Do all required accessible entrance doorways appear at least 32 inches wide and not a revolving door? X 2 If the main entrance is inaccessible, are there alternate accessible entrances? X 3 Is the door hardware easy to operate (lever/push type hardware, no twisting required and not higher than approximately 48 inches above the floor)? X Paths of Travel Yes No NA Comments 1 Are all paths of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair (appear at least 36 inches wide)? X 2 Are wheelchair-accessible facilities (toilet rooms, exits, etc.) identified with signage? X 3 Is there a path of travel that does not require the use of stairs? X Elevators Yes No NA Comments 1 Do the call buttons have visual and audible signals to indicate when a call is registered and answered when car arrives? X 2 Are there visual and audible signals inside cars indicating floor change? X 3 Are there standard raised and Braille marking on both jambs of each hoist way entrance as well as all cab/call buttons? X 4 Do elevator doors have a reopening device that will stop and reopen a car door if an object or a person obstructs the door? X 5 Are elevator controls low enough to be reached from a wheelchair (appears to be between 15 and 48 inches)? X 6 If a two-way emergency communication system is provided within the elevator cab, is it usable without voice communication? X Page 3 of 4 Toilet Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 Are common area public restrooms located on an accessible route? X 2 Are pull handles push/pull or lever type? X 3 Are there audible and visual fire alarm devices in the toilet rooms? X 4 Are toilet room access doors wheelchair- accessible (appear to be at least 32 inches wide)? X 5 Are public restrooms large enough to accommodate a wheelchair turnaround (appear to have 60” turning diameter)? X 6 In unisex toilet rooms, are there safety alarms with pull cords? X 7 Are toilet stall doors wheelchair accessible (appear to be at least 32” wide)? X 8 Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? X 9 Are sinks provided with clearance for a wheelchair to roll under (appear to have 29” clearance)? X 10 Are sink handles operable with one hand without grasping, pinching or twisting? X 11 Are exposed pipes under sink sufficiently insulated against contact? X Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 How many total accessible sleeping rooms does the property management report to have? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible sleeping rooms with respect to the total number of reported guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X 2 How many of the accessible sleeping rooms per property management have roll-in showers? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible rooms with roll-in showers with respect to the total number of reported accessible guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X Page 4 of 4 Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 3 How many assistive listening kits and/or rooms with communication features are available per property management? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported assistive listening devices with respect to the total number of rooms? See attached hot sheet. X Pools Yes No NA Comments 1 Are public access pools provided? If the answer is no, please disregard this section. X 2 How many accessible access points are provided to each pool/spa? Provide number in comment field. Is at least one fixed lift or sloped entry to the pool provided? X Play Area Yes No NA Comments 1 Has the play area been reviewed for accessibility? All public playgrounds are subject to ADAAG standards. X Exercise Equipment Yes No NA Comments 1 Does there appear to be adequate clear floor space around the machines/equipment (30” by 48” minimum)? X *Based on visual observation only. The slope was not confirmed through measurements. EMG Corporate Headquarters 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100, Owings Mills, MD 21117 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Prepared for: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT New Public Works 609 North Bridge Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560 PREPARED BY: EMG CONTACT: EMG Andrew Hupp 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Senior Engineering Consultant Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 800.733.0660 x6632 800.733.0660 arhupp@emgcorp.com www.EMGcorp.com EMG Project Number: Date of Report: On Site Date: 122700.17R000-002.322 September 13, 2017 May 19, 2017 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition ................................................................ 1 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations ...................................................................... 3 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost .......................................................................................................... 4 1.4.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Scope .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Personnel Interviewed ................................................................................................................. 7 2.4. Documentation Reviewed ........................................................................................................... 7 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire ........................................................................................................... 7 2.6. Weather Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 7 3. Accessibility and Property Research ................................................................................................. 8 3.1. ADA Accessibility ........................................................................................................................ 8 4. Existing Building Assessment .......................................................................................................... 10 4.1. Unit or Space Types .................................................................................................................. 10 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed .................................................................... 10 5. Site Improvements ............................................................................................................................. 11 5.1. Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 11 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks ................................................................................................ 11 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control .................................................................................... 12 5.4. Topography and Landscaping ................................................................................................... 13 5.5. General Site Improvements ....................................................................................................... 13 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems ............................................................................... 15 6.1. Foundations ............................................................................................................................... 15 6.2. Superstructure ........................................................................................................................... 15 6.3. Roofing ...................................................................................................................................... 15 6.4. Exterior Walls ............................................................................................................................ 16 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs ......................................................................................................... 17 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors ..................................................................................................... 17 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony ...................................................................................................... 18 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems .................................................................................. 19 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) ..................................................... 19 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water ............................................................................. 20 7.3. Building Gas Distribution ........................................................................................................... 21 7.4. Building Electrical ...................................................................................................................... 22 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems .............................................................................. 22 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems ....................................................................................... 23 8. Interior Spaces .................................................................................................................................... 24 8.1. Interior Finishes ......................................................................................................................... 24 9. Other Structures ................................................................................................................................. 26 10. Certification ......................................................................................................................................... 27 11. Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 28 NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 1 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition The property information is summarized in the table below. More detailed descriptions may be found in the various sections of the report and in the Appendices. Property Information Address: 609 North Bridge Street, Yorkville, IL 60560 Year Constructed/Renovated: Originally constructed early 1900s Current Occupants: City of Yorkville Percent Utilization: 0% Management Point of Contact: Mr. Peter Ratos, Building Code Official, City of Yorkville 630.553.8574 phone Property Type: Municipal Site Area: 0.5 acres Building Area: 2,464 SF Number of Buildings: 1 Number of Stories: 3 Parking Type and Number of Spaces: No designated spaces Building Construction: Conventional wood framed structure with concrete foundation walls Roof Construction: Pitched roof with asphalt shingles Exterior Finishes: Wood siding Heating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning: Furnace and split system condensing unit Fire and Life/Safety: Aged fire alarm system with pull stations and exit signs Dates of Visit: 5/19/2017 On-Site Point of Contact (POC): Peter Ratos Assessment and Report Prepared by: Kevin Koranda Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 Systemic Condition Summary Site Fair HVAC Good Structure Fair Plumbing Fair to poor Roof Fair Electrical Fair to poor NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 2 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Systemic Condition Summary Vertical Envelope Fair Elevators NA Interiors Fair Fire Poor The following bullet points highlight the most significant short term and modernization recommendations: ▪ Wood siding replacement ▪ Electrical system upgrades ▪ Plumbing system upgrades ▪ Lighting upgrades ▪ Sprinkler system retrofit ▪ Fire alarm system upgrades ▪ Interior finish replacement, including: wood floor refinishing, repainting, and carpet replacement ▪ Garage structure demolition Generally, the property appears to have been constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained in recent years and is in fair overall condition. According to property management personnel, the property has had a nonexistent capital improvement expenditure program over the past three years. 1.2. F acility Condition Index (FCI ) NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 3 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate the FCI, which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. Two FCI ratios are calculated and presented, the Current Year and Ten-Year. The Current Year FCI is the ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to the building’s Current Replacement Value. Similarly, the Ten-Year FCI is the ratio of anticipated Capital Reserve Needs over the next ten years to the Current Replacement Value. Fci Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value Good In new or well-maintained condition, with no visual evidence of wear, soiling or other deficiencies. 0% to 5% Fair Subjected to wear and soiling but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. > than 5% to 10% Poor Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. > than 10% to 60% Very Poor Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal is now necessary. > than 60% The graphs above and tables below represent summary-level findings for the FCA. The deficiencies identified in this assessment can be combined with potential new construction requirements to develop an overall strategy that can serve as the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy. Key findings from the assessment include: Key Finding Metric Current Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (IR)/(CRV) 49.0% Poor 10-Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (RR)/(CRV) 12.9% Poor Current Replacement Value (CRV) 2,464 SF * 183.24 / SF = $451,503.36 Year 0 (Current Year) - Immediate Repairs (IR) $449,683 Years 1-10 – Replacement Reserves (RR) $118,443 Total Capital Needs $568,126 The major issues contributing to the Immediate Repair Costs and the Current Year FCI ratio are summarized below: ▪ Wood siding replacement ▪ Electrical system upgrades ▪ Plumbing system upgrades ▪ Lighting upgrades ▪ Sprinkler system retrofit ▪ Fire alarm system upgrades ▪ Interior finish replacement, including: wood floor refinishing, repainting, and carpet replacement ▪ Garage structure demolition Further detail on the specific costs that make up the Immediate Repair Costs can be found in the cost tables at the beginning of this report. 1.3. Special Issues and Follow -Up Recommendations As part of the FCA, a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) was performed to determine the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. Property personnel were interviewed concerning any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Sampling is not a part of this assessment. There are no visual indications of the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, or evidence of severe moisture in representative readily accessible areas of the property. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 4 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 No studies or follow up recommendations appear to be necessary. 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost Cost estimates are attached at the front of this report (following the cover page). These estimates are based on Invoice or Bid Document/s provided either by the Owner/facility and construction costs developed by construction resources such as R.S. Means and Marshall & Swift, EMG’s experience with past costs for similar properties, city cost indexes, and assumptions regarding future economic conditions. Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary, order of magnitude budgets. Actual costs most probably wi ll vary from the consultant’s opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy, quality of materials and installation, manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected, field conditions, whether a physical deficiency is repaired or replaced in whole, phasing of the work (if applicable), quality of contractor, quality of project management exercised, market conditions, and whether competitive pricing is solicited, etc. ASTM E2018-08 recognizes that certain opinions of probable costs cannot be developed within the scope of this guide without further study. Opinions of probable c ost for further study should be included in the FCA.w 1.4.1. Methodology Based upon site observations, research, and judgment, along with referencing Expected Useful Life (EUL) tables from various industry sources, EMG opines as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement. Accurate historical replacement records, if provided, are typically the best source of information. Exposure to the elements, initial quality and installation, extent of use, the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised, etc., are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component. As a result, a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual chronological age. The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age. Projections of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) are based on continued use of the Property similar to the reported past use. Significant changes in occupants and/or usage may affect the service life of some systems or components. Where quantities could not be derived from an actual take-off, lump sum costs or allowances are used. Estimated costs are based on professional judgment and the probable or actual extent of the observed defect, inclusive of the cost to design, procure, construct and manage the corrections. 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs Immediate repairs are opinions of probable costs that require immediate action as a result of: (1) material existing or potential unsafe conditions, (2) material building or fire code violations, or (3) conditions that, if not addressed, have the potential to result in, or contribute to, critical element or system failure within one year or will most probably result in a significant escalation of its remedial cost. 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves Replacement Reserves are for recurring probable expenditures, which are not classified as operation or maintenance expenses. The replacement reserves should be budgeted for in advance on an annual basis. Replacement Reserves are reasonably predictable both in terms of frequency and cost. However, Replacement Reserves may also include components or systems that have an indeterminable life but, nonetheless, have a potential for failure within an estimated time period. Replacement Reserves exclude systems or components that are estimated to expire after the reserve term and are not considered material to the structural and mechanical integrity of the subject property. Furthermore, systems and components that are not deemed to have a material effect on the use of the Property are also excluded. Costs that are caused by acts of God, accidents, or other occurrences that are typically covered by insurance, rather than reserved for, are also excluded. Replacement costs are solicited from ownership/property management, EMG’s discussions with service companies, manufacturers' representatives, and previous experience in preparing such schedules for other similar facilities. Costs for work performed by the ownership’s or property management’s maintenance staff are also considered. EMG’s reserve methodology involves identification and quantification of those systems or components requiring capital reserve funds within the assessment period. The assessment period is defined as the effective age plus the reserve term. Additional information concerning system’s or component’s respective replacement costs (in today's dollars), typical expected useful lives, and remaining useful lives were estimated so that a funding schedule could be prepared. The Replacement Reserves Schedule presupposes that all required remedial work has been performed or that monies for remediation have been budgeted for items defined in the Immediat e Repair Cost Estimate. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 5 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2. Purpose and Scope 2.1. Purpose EMG was retained by the client to render an opinion as to the Property’s current general physical condition on the day of the site visit. Based on the observations, interviews and document review outlined below, this report identifies significant deferred mainten ance issues, existing deficiencies, and material code violations of record at municipal offices, which affect the Property’s use. Opinions are rendered as to its structural integrity, building system condition and the Property’s overall condition. The report also notes building systems or components that have realized or exceeded their typical expected useful lives. CONDITIONS: The physical condition of building systems and related components are typically defined as being in one of five conditions: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Failed or a combination thereof. For the purposes of this report, the following definitions are used: Excellent = New or very close to new; component or system typically has been installed within the past year, sound and performing its function. Eventual repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Good = Satisfactory as-is. Component or system is sound and performing its function, typically within the first third of its lifecycle. However, it may show minor signs of normal wear and tear. Repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Fair = Showing signs of wear and use but still satisfactory as-is, typically near the median of its estimated useful life. Component or system is performing adequately at this time but may exhibit some signs of wear, deferred maintenance, or evidence of previous repairs. Repair or replacement will be required due to the component or system’s condition and/or its estimated remaining useful life. Poor = Component or system is significantly aged, flawed, functioning intermittently or unreliably; displays obvious signs of deferred maintenance; shows evidence of previous repair or workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards; has become obsolete; or exhibits an inherent deficiency. The present condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of contiguous elements or systems. Either full component replacement is needed or repairs are required to restore to good condition, prevent premature failure, and/or prolong useful life. Failed = Component or system has ceased functioning or performing as intended. Replacement, repair, or other significant corrective action is recommended or required. Not Applicable = Assigning a condition does not apply or make logical sense, most commonly due to the item in question not being present. FORMAT OF THE BODY OF THE REPORT: Throughout sections 5 through 9 of this report, each report section will typically contain three subsections organized in the following sequence: ▪ A descriptive table (and/or narrative), which identifies the components assessed, their condition, and other key data points. ▪ A simple bulleted list of Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements, which lists components and assets typically in Excellent, Good, or Fair condition at the time of the assessment but that will require replacement or some other attention once aged past their estimated useful life. These listed components are typically included in the associated inventory database with costs identified and budgeted beyond the first several years. ▪ A bulleted cluster of Actions/Comments, which include more detailed narratives describing deficiencies, recommended repairs, and short term replacements. The assets and components associated with these bullets are/were typically problematic and in Poor or Failed condition at the time of the assessment, with corresponding costs included within the first few years. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 6 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PLAN TYPES: Each line item in the cost database is assigned a Plan Type, which is the primary reason or rationale for the recommended replacement, repair, or other corrective action. This is the “why” part of the equation. A cost or line item may commonly have more than one applicable Plan Type; however, only one Plan Type will be assigned based on the “best” fit, typically the one with the greatest significance. The following Plan Types are listed in general weighted order of importance: Safety = An observed or reported unsafe condition that if left unaddressed could result in an injury; a system or component that presents a potential liability risk. Performance/Integrity = Component or system has failed, is almost failing, performs unreliably, does not perform as intended, and/or poses a risk to overall system stability. Accessibility = Does not meet ADA, UFAS, and/or other handicap accessibility requirements. Environmental = Improvements to air or water quality, including removal of hazardous materials from the building or site. Modernization/Adaptation = Conditions, systems, or spaces that need to be upgraded in appearance or function to meet current standards, facility usage, or client/occupant needs. Lifecycle/Renewal = Any component or system in which future repair or replacement is anticipated beyond the next several years and/or is of minimal substantial early-term consequence. 2.2. Scope The standard scope of the Facility Condition Assessment includes the following: ▪ Visit the Property to evaluate the general condition of the building and site improvements, review available construction documents in order to familiarize ourselves with, and be able to comment on, the in-place construction systems, life safety, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and the general built environment. ▪ Identify those components that are exhibiting deferred maintenance issues and provide cost estimates for Immediate Costs and Replacement Reserves based on observed conditions, maintenance history and industry standard useful life estimates. This will include the review of documented capital improvements completed within the last five-year period and work currently contracted for, if applicable. ▪ Provide a full description of the Property with descriptions of in-place systems and commentary on observed conditions. ▪ Provide a general statement of the subject Property’s compliance to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This will not constitute a full ADA survey, but will help identify exposure to issues and the need for further review. ▪ Perform a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) for the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. EMG will also interview Project personnel regarding the presence of any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Potentially affected areas will be photographed. Sampling will not be considered in routine assessments. ▪ List the current utility service providers. ▪ Review maintenance records and procedures with the in-place maintenance personnel. ▪ Observe a representative sample of the interior spaces/units, including vacant spaces/units, in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas to be observed include the exterior of the property, the roofs, interior common areas, and the significant mechanical, electrical and elevator equipment rooms. ▪ Provide recommendations for additional studies, if required, with related budgetary information. ▪ Provide an Executive Summary at the beginning of this report. ▪ Prepare a mechanical equipment inventory list. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 7 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2.3. Personnel Interviewed The management staff was interviewed for specific information relating to the physical property, available maintenance procedures, historical performance of key building systems and components, available drawings and other documentation. The following personnel from the facility and government agencies were interviewed in the process of conducting the FCA: Name and Title Organization Phone Number Eric Dhuse Public Works Director City of Yorkville 630.553.4370 The FCA was performed with the assistance of Eric Dhuse, Public Works Director, City of Yorkville, the onsite Point of Contact (POC), who was cooperative and provided information that appeared to be accurate based upon subsequent site observations. The onsite contact is completely knowledgeable about the subject property and answered most questions posed during the interview process. The property has only been owned by the city for a short period of time. The POC has been involved with the property since its purchase in 2016. 2.4. Documentation Reviewed Prior to the FCA, relevant documentation was requested that could aid in the knowledge of the subject property’s physical improvements, extent and type of use, and/or assist in identifying material discrepancies between reported information and observed conditions. The review of submitted documents does not include comment on the accuracy of such documents or their preparation, methodology, or protocol. The Documentation Request Form is provided in Appendix E. 2.5. Pre -Survey Questionnaire A Pre-Survey Questionnaire was sent to the POC prior to the site visit. The questionnaire is included in Appendix E. Information obtained from the questionnaire has been used in preparation of this report. 2.6. Weather Conditions 5/19/17: Partly cloudy and raining with temperatures in the 60s (°F) and moderate winds. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 8 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 3. Accessibilit y and Property Resea rch 3.1. ADA Accessibility Generally, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by entities to access and use of “areas of public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” on the basis of disability. Regardless of its age, these areas and facilities must be maintained and operated to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). Buildings completed and occupied after January 26, 1992 are required to comply fully with the ADAAG. Existing facilities constructed prior to this date are held to the lesser standard of compliance to the extent allowed by structural feasibility and the financial resources available. As an alternative, a reasonable accommodation pertaining to the deficiency must be made. During the FCA, a limited visual observation for ADA accessibility compliance was conducted. The scope of the visual observation was limited to those areas set forth in EMG’s Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist provided in Appendix D of this report. It is understood by the Client that the limited observations described herein does not comprise a full ADA Compliance Survey, and that such a survey is beyond the scope of EMG’s undertaking. Only a representative sample of areas was observed and, other than as shown on the Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist, actual measurements were not taken to verify compliance. The facility does not appear to be accessible with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. However, the building is not planned to be used as an area of public accommodation. Achieving ADA compliance would require substantial modifications to the facility and modifications may not be necessary given the planned facility use. With this acknowledged, the issues are nonetheless noted below. The facility does not appear to be accessible with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Elements as defined by the ADAAG that are not accessible as stated within the priorities of Title III, are as follows: Parking ▪ Adequate number of designated parking stalls and signage for cars are not provided. Provide description of location where new stalls are required (adjacent to rental office/adjacent to XX building) ▪ Adequate number of designated parking stalls and signage for vans are not provided. ▪ Access aisles adjacent to parking spaces, crossing hazardous vehicle areas, from main roadways or public transportation stops to the building sidewalks and entrances are not provided. Ramps ▪ The building requires the construction of a straight entrance ramp with handrails to allow wheelchair access. Entrances/Exits ▪ Install buzzer or intercom for assistance and service at exterior entrance doors or parking space. ▪ Existing entrance doors are not wide enough to accommodate wheelchair access and clear floor space beside the door swing is lacking. ▪ Existing stairs are set too close to the front doors for wheelchair access at ground level door ▪ Lever action hardware is not provided Paths of Travel ▪ There are no accessible paths of travel to the second floor or the basement of the building. ▪ Existing carpeting is not securely attached or has a pile thickness exceeding 1/2”. ▪ Stair handrails do not extend beyond the top and bottom risers. ▪ Stair handrails do not extend beyond the top and bottom risers. ▪ Lower objects mounted higher than 27” off the floor, project more than 4” into walks, halls, corridors, passageways, or aisles. Restrooms ▪ Existing restrooms do not meet any ADA criteria and are inaccessible. A full ADA Compliance Survey may reveal additional aspects of the property that are not in compliance. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 9 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Corrections of these conditions should be addressed from a liability standpoint, but are not necessarily code violations. The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines concern civil rights issues as they pertain to the disabled and are not a construction code, although many local jurisdictions have adopted the Guidelines as such. The cost to address the achievable items noted above is included in the cost tables. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 10 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 4. Existing B uilding Assessment 4.1. Unit or Space Types All 5,000 square feet of the building are currently unoccupied. The facility was previously used as a residential home. The spaces are vacant. Primary building areas include: living quarters, a kitchen, and an unfinished basement. 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces N ot Observed All of the interior spaces were observed in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas accessed included the site within the property boundaries, exterior of the property and the roof (observed from the ground). Areas of note that were either inaccessible or not observed for other reasons are listed in the table below: A “down unit” or area is a term used to describe a unit or space that cannot be occupied due to poor conditions such as fire damage, water damage, missing equipment, damaged floor, wall or ceiling surfaces, or other significant deficiencies. There are no down units or areas. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 11 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 5. Site Improvements 5.1. Utilities The following table identifies the utility suppliers and the condition and adequacy of the services. Site Utilities Utility Supplier Condition and Adequacy Sanitary sewer City of Yorkville Good and Adequate Storm sewer City of Yorkville Good and Adequate Domestic water City of Yorkville Good and Adequate Electric service Commonwealth Edison Good and Adequate Natural gas service Nicor Gas Good and Adequate Actions/Comments: ▪ According to the POC, the utilities provided are adequate for the property. There are no unique, onsite utility systems such as emergency electrical generators, septic systems, water or waste water treatment plants, or propane gas tanks. 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks Item Description Main Ingress and Egress North Bridge Street Access from East Additional Entrances NA Additional Access from NA Paving and Flatwork Item Material Last Work Done Condition Entrance Driveway Apron Asphalt 1995 Fair Parking Lot Asphalt 1995 Fair Drive Aisles None NA -- Service Aisles None NA -- Sidewalks Concrete 1995 Fair Curbs None NA -- Site Stairs None NA -- Pedestrian Ramps None NA -- NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 12 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Parking Count Open Lot Carport Private Garage Subterranean Garage Freestanding Parking Structure No designated spaces - - - - Total Number of ADA Compliant Spaces NA Number of ADA Compliant Spaces for Vans 0 Total Parking Spaces NA Parking Ratio (Spaces/Apartments) NA Method of Obtaining Parking Count Physical count Exterior Stairs Location Material Handrails Condition None -- -- - Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ Asphalt seal coating ▪ Asphalt pavement milling and overlaying ▪ Sidewalks Actions/Comments: ▪ The asphalt pavement exhibits isolated areas of failure and deterioration, such as alligator cracking, transverse cracking an d localized depressions. The most severely damaged areas of paving must be cut and patched in order to maintain the integrity of the overall pavement system. All of the paving must be overlaid with new asphalt paving in order to maintain the integrity of the overall pavement system. Milling is recommended as part of the overall repair work. 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control Drainage System and Erosion Control System Exists At Site Condition Surface Flow ☒ Fair Inlets ☒ -- Swales ☐ -- Detention pond ☐ -- Lagoons ☐ -- Ponds ☐ -- Underground Piping ☐ -- Pits ☐ -- Municipal System ☒ -- Dry Well ☐ -- NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 13 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ No components of significance Actions/Comments: ▪ There is no evidence of storm water runoff from adjacent properties. The storm water system appears to provide adequate runoff capacity. There is no evidence of major ponding or erosion 5.4. Topography and Landscaping Item Description Site Topography Slopes gently down from the north side of the property to the south property line. Landscaping Trees Grass Flower Beds Planters Drought Tolerant Plants Decorative Stone None ☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Landscaping Condition Fair Irrigation Automatic Underground Drip Hand Watering None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Irrigation Condition -- Retaining Walls Type Location Condition None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ No components of significance Actions/Comments: ▪ The topography and adjacent uses do not appear to present conditions detrimental to the property. There are no significant areas of erosion. 5.5. General Site Improvements Property Signage Property Signage None Street Address Displayed? Yes NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 14 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Site and Building Lighting Site Lighting None Pole Mounted Bollard Lights Ground Mounted Parking Lot Pole Type ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ -- Building Lighting None Wall Mounted Recessed Soffit ☐ ☒ ☐ Fair REFUSE DISPOSAL Refuse Disposal Individual garbage bins Dumpster Locations Mounting Enclosure Contracted? Condition NA - vacant None None NA -- Other Site Amenities Description Location Condition Playground Equipment None -- -- Tennis Courts None -- -- Basketball Court None -- -- Swimming Pool None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ No components of significance Actions/Comments: ▪ No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 15 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems 6.1. Foundations Building Foundation Item Description Condition Foundation Masonry foundation walls Fair Basement and Crawl Space Concrete slab and concrete walls Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ No components of significance Actions/Comments: ▪ The foundations and footings cannot be directly observed. However, there are isolated areas of standing water, efflorescence, and excessive moisture conditions on the walls and floors in the subterranean basement. The subterranean walls must be repaired and waterproofed. The scope of the repair includes excavation, the installation of a new waterproof system and footing drains, and the backfilling and re-compacting of the excavated soil. 6.2. Superstructure Building Superstructure Item Description Condition Framing / Load-Bearing Walls Conventional wood/metal studs Fair Basement Concrete slab Fair Upper Floor Framing Wood joists Fair Upper Floor Decking Wood Fair Roof Framing Wood trusses Fair Roof Decking Wood boards Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ No components of significance Actions/Comments: ▪ The superstructure is exposed in some locations, which allows for limited observation. Walls and floors appear to be plumb, level, and stable. There are no significant signs of deflection or movement. 6.3. Roofing Primary Roof Type / Geometry Gable Roof Finish Asphalt shingles NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 16 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Primary Roof Maintenance In-house Staff Roof Age 18 Yrs Flashing Sheet metal Warranties None Parapet Copings None Roof Drains Gutters and downspouts Fascia Wood fascia Insulation Fiberglass batts Soffits Exposed Soffits Skylights No Attics Yes Ponding No Ventilation Source-1 Gable end vents Leaks Observed Yes Ventilation Source-2 None Roof Condition Fair The primary roof is located over the entirety of the building. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ Asphalt shingles Actions/Comments: ▪ The roof finishes appear to be more than 15 years old. Information regarding roof warranties or bonds was not available. The roofs are maintained by the in-house maintenance staff. ▪ According to the POC, there are no active roof leaks. There is no evidence of active roof leaks. ▪ There is no evidence of roof deck or insulation deterioration. The roof substrate and insulation should be inspected during any future roof repair or replacement work. ▪ Roof drainage appears to be adequate. Clearing and minor repair of drain system components should be performed regularly as part of the property management’s routine maintenance and operations program. ▪ The attics are not accessible and it could not be determined if there is moisture, water intrusion, or excessive daylight in the attics. There is no evidence of moisture, water intrusion, or excessive daylight in the attics. The insulation in the attics appears to be adequate. 6.4. Exterior Walls Building Exterior Walls Type Location Condition Primary Finish Painted wood Fair to Poor Secondary Finish None NA Accented with Wood trim Fair to Poor Soffits Not Applicable -- Building sealants (caulking) are located between dissimilar materials, at joints, and around window and door openings. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ Wood siding ▪ Exterior painting NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 17 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments: ▪ The wood siding has significant areas of weathered wood siding and wood trim. The painted finishes across much of the building are deteriorated. The damaged materials must be replaced. In addition to these repairs, the exterior walls will require painting. 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs Building Exterior and Interior Stairs Type Description Riser Handrail Balusters Condition Building Exterior Stairs Cast in place concrete Closed Metal Metal Fair Building Exterior Stairs Wood-framed Open Wood Wood Fair Building Interior Stairs Wood-framed Closed Wood Wood Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ No components of significance Actions/Comments: ▪ The wood stairs at the north side of the building have isolated evidence of deteriorated, treads, risers, and balusters. The damaged stair components must be replaced. 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors Building Windows Window Framing Glazing Location Window Screen Condition Wood framed, operable Single glaze Throughout building ☐ Poor Building Doors Main Entrance Doors Door Type Condition Wood, partially glazed Fair Secondary Entrance Doors Solid core wood or metal Fair Service Doors None -- Overhead Doors None -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ Wooden windows ▪ Glazed doors ▪ Metal door NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 18 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments: ▪ The windows are antiquated, energy-inefficient units with single-pane glazing. Some of the windows are difficult to open and close and several of the windows were loose in their sashes. Window replacement is recommended. 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony Not applicable. There are no patios, terraces, or balconies. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 19 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems See the Mechanical Equipment List in the Appendices for the quantity, manufacturer’s name, model number, capacity and year of manufacturer of the major mechanical equipment, if available. 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Building Central Heating System Primary Heating System Type Forced air furnace Quantity and Capacity of Major Components 1 furnace at 95 MBH Total Heating Capacity 95 MBH Heating Fuel Natural gas Location of Major Equipment Basement Space Served by System Entire building Age Ranges 2015 Condition Good Heat Exchanger Condition -- Building Central Cooling System Primary Cooling System Type Condensing unit Quantity and Capacity of Major Components 1 condensing unit at 3 tons Total Cooling Capacity 3 tons Refrigerant R-410A Cooling Towers NA Location of Major Equipment Adjacent north wall Space Served by System Entire building Age Ranges 2015 Condensing Unit Condition Good Supplemental Components Supplemental Component #1 NA Location / Space Served NA Condition -- NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 20 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Controls and Ventilation HVAC Control System Individual non-programmable thermostats/controls HVAC Control System Condition Poor Building Ventilation Natural ventilation only Ventilation System Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ Furnace ▪ Split system condensing unit Actions/Comments: ▪ The HVAC systems are maintained by the in-house maintenance staff. Records of the installation, maintenance, upgrades, and replacement of the HVAC equipment at the property have been maintained since the property was first occupied. ▪ Approximately 0 percent of the HVAC equipment is original. HVAC equipment is replaced on an "as needed" basis. ▪ The HVAC equipment appears to be functioning adequately overall. The property management staff was interviewed about the historical and recent performance of the equipment and systems. No chronic problems were reported and an overall sense of satisfaction with the systems was conveyed. However, due to the inevitable failure of parts and components over time, some of the equipment will require replacement. 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water Building Plumbing System Type Description Condition Water Supply Piping Copper and galvanized iron Fair to poor Waste/Sewer Piping Cast iron and PVC Fair to poor Vent Piping Cast iron and PVC Fair to poor Water Meter Location Basement Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Components Water Heater Fuel Natural gas Quantity and Input Capacity 1 unit at 32 MBH Storage Capacity 40 gallons Boiler or Water Heater Condition Fair Supplementary Storage Tanks? No Storage Tank Quantity & Volume 0 Quantity of Storage Tanks 0 Storage Tank Condition -- Domestic Hot Water Circulation Pumps (3 HP and over) No Adequacy of Hot Water Unknown NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 21 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Adequacy of Water Pressure Unknown Plumbing Fixtures Water Closets Residential Toilet (Water Closet) Flush Rating 3.5 GPF Common Area Faucet Nominal Flow Rate 2.0+ GPM Condition Fair to poor Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ Supply distribution piping ▪ Waste/sanitary distribution piping ▪ Water heater ▪ Toilets ▪ Sinks ▪ Bathtubs Actions/Comments: ▪ Most of the domestic water lines are galvanized iron. To date there has been no history of chronic leaks or water pressure problems. However, it is quite common for galvanized iron piping to develop problems due to long-term corrosion with thinning walls and/or interior mineral deposit accumulation, especially once it has aged 40 or 50 years. EMG highly encourages some easily accessible pipe sections be examined to more accurately determine the interior pipe wall conditions after nearly 60 years of use. Pending these results, consideration should be given to replacing all the plumbing supply lines with copper. A budgetary cost for full replacement is included. ▪ The cast iron sanitary piping is aged and appears to be original to the building. The piping is corroded and generally in poor condition. The budgetary cost above includes an amount for the replacement of the original sanitary piping. ▪ The restroom accessories and fixtures are antiquated and exhibit significant wear. The restroom accessories and fixtures require replacement. 7.3. Building Gas D istribution Gas service is supplied from the gas main on the adjacent public street. The gas meter and regulator is located along the exterior wall of the building. The gas distribution piping within the building is malleable steel (black iron). Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ No components of significance Actions/Comments: ▪ The pressure and quantity of gas appear to be adequate. ▪ The gas meter and regulator appear to be functioning adequately and will require routine maintenance. ▪ Only limited observation of the gas distribution piping can be made due to hidden conditions. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 22 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7.4. Building Electrical Building Electrical Systems Electrical Lines Overhead Transformer Pole-mounted Main Service Size 100 Amps Volts 120/208 Volt, three-phase Meter & Panel Location Basement Branch Wiring Copper Conduit Metallic Step-Down Transformers? No Security / Surveillance System? No Building Intercom System? No Lighting Fixtures Incandescent Main Distribution Condition Fair Lighting Condition Fair to poor Building Emergency System Size None Fuel -- Generator / UPS Serves -- Tank Location -- Testing Frequency -- Tank Type -- Generator / UPS Condition -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ Circuit breaker panel ▪ Interior light fixtures ▪ Distribution wiring Actions/Comments: ▪ The onsite electrical systems up to the meters are owned and maintained by the respective utility company. ▪ The electrical service and capacity appear to be adequate for the property’s demands. ▪ Some of the electrical components within the building, including the knob-and-tube style wiring, are original. A partial modernization/upgrade is recommended to the aging interior electrical infrastructure. An overall budgetary allowance is included to account for some corresponding wiring and sub-feed replacements and upgrades. 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems Not applicable. There are no elevators or conveying systems. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 23 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems Item Description Type None Fire Alarm System Central Alarm Panel ☐ Battery-Operated Smoke Detectors ☒ Alarm Horns ☒ Annunciator Panels ☐ Hard-Wired Smoke Detectors ☐ Strobe Light Alarms ☐ Pull Stations ☒ Emergency Battery-Pack Lighting ☐ Illuminated EXIT Signs ☒ Alarm System Condition Poor Sprinkler System None ☒ Standpipes ☐ Backflow Preventer ☐ Hose Cabinets ☐ Fire Pumps ☐ Siamese Connections ☐ Suppression Condition Fair Central Alarm Panel System Location of Alarm Panel Installation Date of Alarm Panel None NA Fire Extinguishers Last Service Date Servicing Current? None located NA Hydrant Location Adjacent streets Siamese Location None Special Systems Kitchen Suppression System ☐ Computer Room Suppression System ☐ Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ Exit light fixture Actions/Comments: ▪ Fire extinguishers appear to be missing at all locations. New fire extinguishers must be installed at all required locations immediately. ▪ The fire alarm systems appear somewhat antiquated and not up to current standards. The system utilized outdated components a nd lacks strobe light alarm, does not have a sufficient number of pull stations, has non-functional lighted exit signs and no backup light fixtures. Due to the age of the components and apparent shortcomings, a full modernization project is recommended. As part of the major planned short term renovations, a facility-wide fire alarm modernization is recommended. A budgetary cost is included. ▪ The building is not protected by fire suppression. Due to its construction date, the facility is most likely “grandfathered” by code and the installation of fire sprinklers not required until major renovations are performed. Regardless of when or if installatio n of facility- wide fire suppression is required by the governing municipality, EMG recommends a retrofit be performed. As part of the major recommended short term renovations, a facility-wide fire suppression retrofit is recommended. A budgetary cost is included. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 24 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 8. I nterior Spaces 8.1. I nterior Finishes All 2,464 square feet of the building are currently unoccupied. The facility was previously a single-family home. The spaces are vacant. The following table generally describes the locations and typical conditions of the interior finishes within the facility: Typical Floor Finishes Floor Finish Locations General Condition Wood Throughout first floor living room areas, second floor bedrooms Fair to poor Carpet Stairwell, first floor bedroom Poor Vinyl tile Kitchen, bathrooms Fair to poor Concrete Basement Fair Typical Wall Finishes Wall Finish Locations General Condition Painted plaster Throughout building Fair Painted CMU Basement Fair Typical Ceiling Finishes Ceiling Finish Locations General Condition Painted plaster Throughout building Fair Interior Doors Item Type Condition Interior Doors Solid core/hollow core Fair Door Framing Wood Fair Fire Doors No NA Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements: ▪ Carpet ▪ Vinyl tile ▪ Wood flooring refinishing ▪ Interior painting ▪ Interior doors NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 25 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments: ▪ It appears that the interior finishes have not been renovated within the last 30 years. ▪ The interior finishes are old, worn, and outdated The VCT and carpeting is aged. The wood flooring is worn in some areas and will require refinishing. Partial interior renovations that include comprehensive updating of the interior finishes are recommended as part of the overall facility renovation. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 26 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 9. Other Structures A garage building is located to the west of the main building. The garage is a wood framed structure set on a concrete slab. The garage is deteriorating and in poor overall condition. Actions/Comments: ▪ The property management stated that the City currently plans on demolishing the garage. No replacement costs for any of the garage finishes are included in the report. A budgetary allowance for the demolition work is included. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 27 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 10. Certification The City of Yorkville retained EMG to perform this Facility Condition Assessment in connection with its continued operation of New Public Works, 609 North Bridge Street, Yorkville, IL, the “Property”. It is our understanding that the primary interest of the City of Yorkville is to locate and evaluate materials and building system defects that might significantly affect the value of the property and to determine if the present Property has conditions that will have a significant impact on its continued operations. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the brief review of the plans and records made available to our Project Manager during the site visit, interviews of available property management personnel and maintenance contractors familiar with the Property, appropriate inquiry of municipal authorities, our Project Manager’s walk-through observations during the site visit, and our experience with similar properties. No testing, exploratory probing, dismantling or operating of equipment or in depth studies were performed unless specifically required under Section 2 of this report. This assessment did not include engineering calculations to determine the adequacy of the Property’s original design or existing systems. Although walk-through observations were performed, not all areas were observed (See Section 4.2 for areas observed). There may be defects in the Property, which were in areas not observed or readily accessible, may not have been visible, or were not disclosed by management personnel when questioned. The report describes property conditions at the time that the observations and research were conducted. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for the use of the City of Yorkville for the purpose stated within Section 2 of this report. The report, or any excerpt thereof, shall not be used by any party other than the City of Yorkville or for any other purpose than that specifically stated in our agreement or within Section 2 of this report without the express written consent of EMG. Any reuse or distribution of this report without such consent shall be at the City of Yorkville and the recipient’s sole risk, without liability to EMG. Prepared by: Kevin Koranda, Project Manager Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 28 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 11. Appendices Appendix A: Photographic Record Appendix B: Site Plan Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Appendix D: Pre-Survey Questionnaire NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix A: Photographic Record NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #1: FRONT ENTRANCE PHOTO #2: FRONT ELEVATION PHOTO #3: NORTH ELEVATION PHOTO #4: SOUTH ELEVATION PHOTO #5: SOUTH ELEVATION PHOTO #6: WEST ELEVATION NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #7: SITE PHOTO #8: SIDEWALK PHOTO #9: SIDEWALK PHOTO #10: ASPHALT DRIVEWAY PHOTO #11: GARAGE PHOTO #12: ENTRY DOOR NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #13: ENTRY STEPS PHOTO #14: FRONT ENTRY STEPS PHOTO #15: WINDOWS PHOTO #16: SMALL BASEMENT WINDOW PHOTO #17: NORTH ENTRY DOOR PHOTO #18: WOOD SIDING NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #19: NORTH STAIRS PHOTO #20: ROOF DECKING PHOTO #21: INSULATION PHOTO #22: WOOD WINDOW PHOTO #23: LOAD CENTER PHOTO #24: FURNACE NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #25: CONDENSING UNIT PHOTO #26: THERMOSTAT PHOTO #27: WATER HEATER PHOTO #28: GALVANIZED WATER PIPE PHOTO #29: CAST IRON SANITARY PIPE PHOTO #30: CAST IRON SANITARY PIPE, AGED NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #31: PULL STATION PHOTO #32: FIRE ALARM BELL PHOTO #33: EXIT SIGN PHOTO #34: SMOKE DETECTOR PHOTO #35: KITCHEN, VINYL TILE PHOTO #36: KITCHEN CABINETS NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #37: WOOD FLOORING PHOTO #38: WOOD FLOORING PHOTO #39: BUILT-IN CABINETRY PHOTO #40: WINDOWS PHOTO #41: CARPET PHOTO #42: TOILET NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #43: SINK PHOTO #44: TUB PHOTO #45: SINK PHOTO #46: STAIRWELL PHOTO #47: WOOD FLOORING PHOTO #48: SECOND FLOOR EXIT DOOR, METAL NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #49: LIGHT FIXTURE PHOTO #50: LIGHT FIXTURE PHOTO #51: WOOD FLOOR PHOTO #52: BATHROOM, SECOND FLOOR PHOTO #53: VINYL TILE PHOTO #54: BATHTUB NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #55: BASEMENT STAIRS PHOTO #56: CONCRETE SLAB PHOTO #57: CONCRETE LAUNDRY SINK PHOTO #58: WORKSHOP ROOM NORTH OF STAIRS PHOTO #59: EFFLORESCENCE AND WATER STAINING PHOTO #60: WATER DAMAGED WALL NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix B: S ite Plan Site Plan Project Name: New Public Works Project Number: 122700.17R000-002.322 Source: Google Earth Pro On-Site Date: 5/19/2017 NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Page 1 of 4 Date Completed: 5/19/17 Property Name: New Public Works EMG Project Number: 122700.17R000-002.322 Building History Yes No Unk Comments 1 Has an ADA survey previously been completed for this property? ✔ 2 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? ✔ 3 Does a Transition Plan / Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? ✔ 4 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints that have not been resolved? ✔ 5 Is any litigation pending related to ADA issues? ✔ Parking Yes No NA Comments 1 Are there sufficient accessible parking spaces with respect to the total number of reported spaces? ✔ 2 Are there sufficient van-accessible parking spaces available? ✔ 3 Are accessible spaces marked with the International Symbol of Accessibility? Are there signs reading “Van Accessible” at van spaces? ✔ 4 Is there at least one accessible route provided within the boundary of the site from public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones, if provided, and public streets and sidewalks? ✔ 5 Do curbs on the accessible route have depressed, ramped curb cuts at drives, paths, and drop-offs? ✔ 6 If required does signage exist directing you to accessible parking and an accessible building entrance? ✔ Ramps Yes No NA Comments 1* Do all ramps along accessible path of travel appear to meet slope requirements? ( 1:12 or less) ✔ 2 Are ramps that appear longer than 6 ft complete with railings on both sides? ✔ Page 2 of 4 Ramps Yes No NA Comments 3 Does the width between railings appear at least 36 inches? ✔ 4 Is there a level landing for approximately every 30 ft horizontal length of ramp, at the top and at the bottom of ramps and switchbacks? ✔ Entrances/Exits Yes No NA Comments 1 Do all required accessible entrance doorways appear at least 32 inches wide and not a revolving door? ✔ 2 If the main entrance is inaccessible, are there alternate accessible entrances? ✔ 3 Is the door hardware easy to operate (lever/push type hardware, no twisting required and not higher than approximately 48 inches above the floor)? ✔ Paths of Travel Yes No NA Comments 1 Are all paths of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair (appear at least 36 inches wide)? ✔ 2 Are wheelchair-accessible facilities (toilet rooms, exits, etc.) identified with signage? ✔ 3 Is there a path of travel that does not require the use of stairs? ✔ Elevators Yes No NA Comments 1 Do the call buttons have visual and audible signals to indicate when a call is registered and answered when car arrives? ✔ 2 Are there visual and audible signals inside cars indicating floor change? ✔ 3 Are there standard raised and Braille marking on both jambs of each hoist way entrance as well as all cab/call buttons? ✔ 4 Do elevator doors have a reopening device that will stop and reopen a car door if an object or a person obstructs the door? ✔ 5 Are elevator controls low enough to be reached from a wheelchair (appears to be between 15 and 48 inches)? ✔ 6 If a two-way emergency communication system is provided within the elevator cab, is it usable without voice communication? ✔ Page 3 of 4 Toilet Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 Are common area public restrooms located on an accessible route? ✔ 2 Are pull handles push/pull or lever type? ✔ 3 Are there audible and visual fire alarm devices in the toilet rooms? ✔ 4 Are toilet room access doors wheelchair- accessible (appear to be at least 32 inches wide)? ✔ 5 Are public restrooms large enough to accommodate a wheelchair turnaround (appear to have 60” turning diameter)? ✔ 6 In unisex toilet rooms, are there safety alarms with pull cords? ✔ 7 Are toilet stall doors wheelchair accessible (appear to be at least 32” wide)? ✔ 8 Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? ✔ 9 Are sinks provided with clearance for a wheelchair to roll under (appear to have 29” clearance)? ✔ 10 Are sink handles operable with one hand without grasping, pinching or twisting? ✔ 11 Are exposed pipes under sink sufficiently insulated against contact? ✔ Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 How many total accessible sleeping rooms does the property management report to have? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible sleeping rooms with respect to the total number of reported guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. ✔ Page 4 of 4 Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 2 How many of the accessible sleeping rooms per property management have roll- in showers? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible rooms with roll-in showers with respect to the total number of reported accessible guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. ✔ 3 How many assistive listening kits and/or rooms with communication features are available per property management? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported assistive listening devices with respect to the total number of rooms? See attached hot sheet. ✔ Pools Yes No NA Comments 1 Are public access pools provided? If the answer is no, please disregard this section. ✔ 2 How many accessible access points are provided to each pool/spa? Provide number in comment field. Is at least one fixed lift or sloped entry to the pool provided? ✔ Play Area Yes No NA Comments 1 Has the play area been reviewed for accessibility? All public playgrounds are subject to ADAAG standards. ✔ Exercise Equipment Yes No NA Comments 1 Does there appear to be adequate clear floor space around the machines/equipment (30” by 48” minimum)? ✔ *Based on visual observation only. The slope was not confirmed through measurements. NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix D: Pre-Survey Questionnaire NEW PUBLIC WORKS EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-002.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 On the day of the site visit, provide EMG's Field Observer access to all of the available documents listed below. Provide copies if possible. INFORMATION REQUIRED 1. All available construction documents (blueprints) for the original construction of the building or for any tenant improvement work or other recent construction work. 2. A site plan, preferably 8 1/2" X 11", which depicts the arrangement of buildings, roads, parking stalls, and other site features. 3. For commercial properties, provide a tenant list which identifies the names of each tenant, vacant tenant units, the floor area of each tenant space, and the gross and net leasable area of the building(s). 4. For apartment properties, provide a summary of the apartment unit types and apartment unit type quantities, including the floor area of each apartment unit as measured in square feet. 5. For hotel or nursing home properties, provide a summary of the room types and room type quantities. 6. Copies of Certificates of Occupancy, building permits, fire or health department inspection reports, elevator inspection certificates, roof or HVAC warranties, or any other similar, relevant documents. 7. The names of the local utility companies which serve the property, including the water, sewer, electric, gas, and phone companies. 8. The company name, phone number, and contact person of all outside vendors who serve the property, such as mechanical contractors, roof contractors, fire sprinkler or fire extinguisher testing contractors, and elevator contractors. 9. A summary of recent (over the last 5 years) capital improvement work which describes the scope of the work and the estimated cost of the improvements. Executed contracts or proposals for improvements. Historical costs for repairs, improvements, and replacements. 10. Records of system & material ages (roof, MEP, paving, finishes, furnishings). 11. Any brochures or marketing information. 12. Appraisal, either current or previously prepared. 13. Current occupancy percentage and typical turnover rate records (for commercial and apartment properties). 14. Previous reports pertaining to the physical condition of property. 15. ADA survey and status of improvements implemented. 16. Current / pending litigation related to property condition. Your timely compliance with this request is greatly appreciated. EMG Corporate Headquarters 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100, Owings Mills, MD 21117 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Prepared for: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT Historic Jail 111 West Madison Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560 PREPARED BY: EMG CONTACT: EMG Andrew Hupp 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Senior Engineering Consultant Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 800.733.0660 x6632 800.733.0660 arhupp@emgcorp.com www.EMGcorp.com EMG Project Number: Date of Report: On Site Date: 122700.17R000-003.322 September 13, 2017 May 17, 2017 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT Immediate Repairs Report Historic Jail 9/13/2017 Location NameEMG Renamed Item NumberID Cost Description QuantityUnit Unit Cost Subtotal Deficiency Repair Estimate * Historic Jail 1.3 609536 Engineer, Environmental, Mold Remediation, Evaluate/Report 1 EA $3,162.50 $3,163 $3,163 Historic Jail 5.2 609539 Exterior Stairs, Concrete, Replace 15 SF $48.94 $734 $734 Historic Jail 5.5 609221 Lighting Fixture, 80 W, Replace 2 EA $256.88 $514 $514 Historic Jail 5.5 609191 Exterior Light Pole 1 EA $2,721.00 $2,721 $2,721 Historic Jail 6.2 609223 Structural Frame 1000 SF $25.10 $25,100 $25,100 Historic Jail 6.2 609216 Study, Structural, Superstructure,1 EA $10,120.00 $10,120 $10,120 Historic Jail 6.3 609196 Roof, , Replace 60 SF $10.52 $631 $631 Historic Jail 6.3 609225 Roof, Premium Grade, Replace 3765 SF $5.04 $18,975 $18,975 Historic Jail 6.4 609174 Brick Veneer Exterior Wall, Exterior, 1-2 Stories, Repair 80 SF $48.56 $3,884 $3,884 Historic Jail 6.4 609179 Brick Veneer Exterior Wall, Exterior, 1-2 Stories, Repair 600 SF $41.28 $24,770 $24,770 Historic Jail 6.4 609228 Exterior Wall 80 LF $2.82 $226 $226 Historic Jail 6.4 609232 Field Stone, Exterior, 1-2 Stories, Repair 150 SF $49.82 $7,473 $7,473 Historic Jail 6.4 609188 Wood Shakes/Shingles, 1-2 Stories, Replace 90 SF $6.69 $602 $602 Historic Jail 6.5 609183 Interior Stairs/Ramp, Interior Stairs, Replace 110 SF $44.53 $4,898 $4,898 Historic Jail 6.6 609181 Window, 1-2 Stories, 12 SF, Replace 4 EA $719.86 $2,879 $2,879 Historic Jail 6.6 609175 Exterior Door, Solid Core, Fully Glazed, Exterior Door, Replace 2 EA $1,982.31 $3,965 $3,965 Historic Jail 6.6 609193 Exterior Door, Solid Core, Painted, Exterior Door, Replace 2 EA $1,423.11 $2,846 $2,846 Historic Jail 6.6 609234 Overhead Door, 144 SF, Replace 1 EA $2,634.03 $2,634 $2,634 Historic Jail 7.6 609205 Fire Extinguisher, , Replace 5 EA $356.54 $1,783 $1,783 Historic Jail 7.6 614544 Emergency Lighting Pack, 2 Light w/ Battery, Replace 1 EA $1,227.87 $1,228 $1,228 Historic Jail 8.1 609227 Interior Walls, Interior Wall, Repair 1800 SF $3.18 $5,726 $5,726 Historic Jail 8.1 609219 Ceilings, Ceiling, Repair 850 SF $7.32 $6,221 $6,221 Immediate Repairs Total $131,093 * Location Factor included in totals. Replacement Reserves Report Historic Jail 9/13/2017 Location Name EMG Renamed Item Number ID Cost Description Lifespan (EUL)EAge RUL QuantityUnit Unit Cost Subtotal 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 Deficiency Repair Estimate Historic Jail 1.3 609536 Engineer, Environmental, Mold Remediation, Evaluate/Report 0 2016 0 1 EA $3,162.50 $3,163 $3,163 $3,163 Historic Jail 5.2 609539 Exterior Stairs, Concrete, Replace 50 50 0 15 SF $48.94 $734 $734 $734 Historic Jail 5.2 609180 Parking Lot, Parking Lot, Repair 5 3 2 1000 SF $0.38 $380 $380 $380 $380 $380 $1,518 Historic Jail 5.2 609236 Parking Lot, Parking Lot, Repair 25 7 18 1000 SF $3.28 $3,280 $3,280 $3,280 Historic Jail 5.5 609221 Lighting Fixture, 80 W, Replace 20 27 0 2 EA $256.88 $514 $514 $514 Historic Jail 5.5 609191 Exterior Light Pole 20 27 0 1 EA $2,721.00 $2,721 $2,721 $2,721 Historic Jail 6.2 609223 Structural Frame 50 50 0 1000 SF $25.10 $25,100 $25,100 $25,100 Historic Jail 6.2 609216 Study, Structural, Superstructure,0 50 0 1 EA $10,120.00 $10,120 $10,120 $10,120 Historic Jail 6.3 609196 Roof, , Replace 20 27 0 60 SF $10.52 $631 $631 $631 Historic Jail 6.3 609225 Roof, Premium Grade, Replace 30 41 0 3765 SF $5.04 $18,975 $18,975 $18,975 Historic Jail 6.3 609213 Roof, , Replace 20 18 2 150 SF $9.00 $1,349 $1,349 $1,349 Historic Jail 6.4 609174 Brick Veneer Exterior Wall, Exterior, 1-2 Stories, Repair 0 121 0 80 SF $48.56 $3,884 $3,884 $3,884 Historic Jail 6.4 609179 Brick Veneer Exterior Wall, Exterior, 1-2 Stories, Repair 25 41 0 600 SF $41.28 $24,770 $24,770 $24,770 Historic Jail 6.4 609228 Exterior Wall 10 17 0 80 LF $2.82 $226 $226 $226 $451 Historic Jail 6.4 609232 Field Stone, Exterior, 1-2 Stories, Repair 0 121 0 150 SF $49.82 $7,473 $7,473 $7,473 Historic Jail 6.4 609188 Wood Shakes/Shingles, 1-2 Stories, Replace 20 41 0 90 SF $6.69 $602 $602 $602 Historic Jail 6.5 609183 Interior Stairs/Ramp, Interior Stairs, Replace 50 50 0 110 SF $44.53 $4,898 $4,898 $4,898 Historic Jail 6.6 609181 Window, 1-2 Stories, 12 SF, Replace 30 41 0 4 EA $719.86 $2,879 $2,879 $2,879 Historic Jail 6.6 609175 Exterior Door, Solid Core, Fully Glazed, Exterior Door, Replace 25 41 0 2 EA $1,982.31 $3,965 $3,965 $3,965 Historic Jail 6.6 609193 Exterior Door, Solid Core, Painted, Exterior Door, Replace 25 41 0 2 EA $1,423.11 $2,846 $2,846 $2,846 Historic Jail 6.6 609234 Overhead Door, 144 SF, Replace 35 41 0 1 EA $2,634.03 $2,634 $2,634 $2,634 Historic Jail 7.6 609205 Fire Extinguisher, , Replace 15 22 0 5 EA $356.54 $1,783 $1,783 $1,783 $3,565 Historic Jail 7.6 614544 Emergency Lighting Pack, 2 Light w/ Battery, Replace 10 26 0 1 EA $1,227.87 $1,228 $1,228 $1,228 $2,456 Historic Jail 8.1 609227 Interior Walls, Interior Wall, Repair 0 39 0 1800 SF $3.18 $5,726 $5,726 $5,726 Historic Jail 8.1 609219 Ceilings, Ceiling, Repair 0 39 0 850 SF $7.32 $6,221 $6,221 $6,221 Totals, Unescalated $131,093 $0 $1,729 $0 $0 $0 $0 $380 $0 $0 $1,453 $0 $380 $0 $0 $1,783 $0 $380 $3,280 $0 $140,477 Totals, Escalated (3.0% inflation, compounded annually)$131,093 $0 $1,834 $0 $0 $0 $0 $467 $0 $0 $1,953 $0 $541 $0 $0 $2,777 $0 $627 $5,585 $0 $144,877 HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition ................................................................ 1 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations ...................................................................... 3 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost .......................................................................................................... 4 1.4.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 6 2.1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Scope .......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3. Personnel Interviewed ................................................................................................................. 7 2.4. Documentation Reviewed ........................................................................................................... 8 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire ........................................................................................................... 8 2.6. Weather Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 8 3. Accessibility and Property Research ................................................................................................. 9 3.1. ADA Accessibility ........................................................................................................................ 9 4. Existing Building Assessment .......................................................................................................... 10 4.1. Unit or Space Types .................................................................................................................. 10 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed .................................................................... 10 5. Site Improvements ............................................................................................................................. 11 5.1. Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 11 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks ................................................................................................ 11 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control .................................................................................... 12 5.4. Topography and Landscaping ................................................................................................... 13 5.5. General Site Improvements ....................................................................................................... 13 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems ............................................................................... 15 6.1. Foundations ............................................................................................................................... 15 6.2. Superstructure ........................................................................................................................... 15 6.3. Roofing ...................................................................................................................................... 16 6.4. Exterior Walls ............................................................................................................................ 17 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs ......................................................................................................... 17 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors ..................................................................................................... 18 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony ...................................................................................................... 18 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems .................................................................................. 19 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) ..................................................... 19 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water ............................................................................. 20 7.3. Building Gas Distribution ........................................................................................................... 21 7.4. Building Electrical ...................................................................................................................... 21 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems .............................................................................. 22 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems ....................................................................................... 22 8. Interior Spaces .................................................................................................................................... 24 8.1. Interior Finishes ......................................................................................................................... 24 9. Other Structures ................................................................................................................................. 26 10. Certification ......................................................................................................................................... 27 11. Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 28 HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 1 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition The property information is summarized in the table below. More detailed descriptions may be found in the various sections of the report and in the Appendices. Property Information Address: 111 West Madison Street, Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Year Constructed/Renovated: Originally constructed 1893 Addition/restoration 1970s Current Occupants: None Percent Utilization: 0% Management Point of Contact: Mr. Peter Ratos, Building Code Official, City of Yorkville 630.553.8574 phone Property Type: Municipal Site Area: 0.30 acres Building Area: 5,000 SF Number of Buildings: 1 Number of Stories: 3 Parking Type and Number of Spaces: 3 spaces adjacent to street Building Construction: Conventional wood framed structure with areas of reinforced concrete Roof Construction: Pitched roof with asphalt shingles Flat roofs with built-up membrane at small area Exterior Finishes: Brick Veneer Field stone Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning: Central system with boiler serving older area Furnace and split system condensing unit serving newer area and garage Fire and Life/Safety: Hydrants, extinguishers, and one backup light fixture. Dates of Visit: 5/17/2016 On-Site Point of Contact (POC): Peter Ratos Assessment and Report Prepared by: Kevin Koranda Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 Systemic Condition Summary Site Fair HVAC Poor HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 2 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Systemic Condition Summary Structure Poor Plumbing Poor Roof Failed Electrical Poor Vertical Envelope Poor Elevators NA Interiors Failed Fire Poor The following bullet points highlight the most significant short term and modernization recommendations:  Structural evaluation and repairs  Roof replacement  Exterior brick repointing  Foundation wall repointing Generally, the property appears to have been constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been poorly maintained in recent years and is in poor overall condition. According to property management personnel, the property has had a nonexistent capital improvement expenditure program over the past three years. 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate the FCI, which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. Two FCI ratios are calculated and presented, the Current Year and Ten-Year. The Current Year FCI is the ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to the building’s Current Replacement Value. Similarly, the Ten-Year FCI is the ratio of anticipated Capital Reserve Needs over the next ten years to the Current Replacement Value. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 3 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Fci Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value Good In new or well-maintained condition, with no visual evidence of wear, soiling or other deficiencies. 0% to 5% Fair Subjected to wear and soiling but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. > than 5% to 10% Poor Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. > than 10% to 60% Very Poor Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal is now necessary. > than 60% The graphs above and tables below represent summary-level findings for the FCA. The deficiencies identified in this assessment can be combined with potential new construction requirements to develop an overall strategy that can serve as the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy. Key findings from the assessment include: Key Finding Metric Current Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (IR)/(CRV) 14.4% Poor 10-Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (RR)/(CRV) 0.3% Good Current Replacement Value (CRV) 5,000 SF * 183.24 / SF = $916,186 Year 0 (Current Year) - Immediate Repairs (IR) $132,443 Years 1-10 – Replacement Reserves (RR) $2,823 Total Capital Needs $135,266 The major issues contributing to the Immediate Repair Costs and the Current Year FCI ratio are summarized below:  Structural evaluation and repairs  Roof replacement  Exterior brick repointing  Foundation wall repointing Further detail on the specific costs that make up the Immediate Repair Costs can be found in the cost tables at the beginning of this report. 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations As part of the FCA, a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) was performed to determine the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. Property personnel were interviewed concerning any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Sampling is not a part of this assessment. Areas of suspect fungal growth, fungal or mildew-like odors, moisture, elevated humidity, moisture stains, mildew, and water damage were observed along the drywall in the following areas:  Central hallway, upper and lower floors: a severe roof leak has resulted in significant water damage to these areas of the facility. Substantial micro-mold growth and the growth of both plants and macro-fungi was observed. Additional growth is presumed to be present within the walls, floors, and attic spaces in this area.  Third Floor loft: moisture stains and mold/mildew odors were observed in this area. Based on the apparent extent of fungal growth (more than 30 square feet), the fungal growth must be abated by a qualified fungal growth remediation contractor. The cost to retain a consultant to conduct an extensive fungal growth survey and to recommend clean- up methods and repairs is included in the cost tables. A cost allowance to address the roof and replace the affected areas of fungal growth is also included. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 4 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 The following study is recommended.  The central hallway is in very poor condition due to water infiltration. The structure in this area has potentially been rendered unsound from water damage. A professional engineer must be retained to analyze the existing condition, provide recommendations and, if necessary, estimate the scope and cost of any required repairs. The cost of this study is included in the cost tables. A cost allowance to repair structural damage is also included in the cost tables. There are a number of unresolved Fire Code violations. See Section 7.6 for descriptions and comments. 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost Cost estimates are attached at the front of this report (following the cover page). These estimates are based on Invoice or Bid Document/s provided either by the Owner/facility and construction costs developed by construction resources such as R.S. Means and Marshall & Swift, EMG’s experience with past costs for similar properties, city cost indexes, and assumptions regarding future economic conditions. Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary, order of magnitude budgets. Actual costs most probably will vary from the consultant’s opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy, quality of materials and installation, manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected, field conditions, whether a physical deficiency is repaired or replaced in whole, phasing of the work (if applicable), quality of contractor, quality of project management exercised, market conditions, and whether competitive pricing is solicited, etc. ASTM E2018-08 recognizes that certain opinions of probable costs cannot be developed within the scope of this guide without further study. Opinions of probable cost for further study should be included in the FCA. 1.4.1. Methodology Based upon site observations, research, and judgment, along with referencing Expected Useful Life (EUL) tables from various industry sources, EMG opines as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement. Accurate historical replacement records, if provided, are typically the best source of information. Exposure to the elements, initial quality and installation, extent of use, the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised, etc., are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component. As a result, a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual chronological age. The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age. Projections of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) are based on continued use of the Property similar to the reported past use. Significant changes in occupants and/or usage may affect the service life of some systems or components. Where quantities could not be derived from an actual take-off, lump sum costs or allowances are used. Estimated costs are based on professional judgment and the probable or actual extent of the observed defect, inclusive of the cost to design, procure, construct and manage the corrections. 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs Immediate repairs are opinions of probable costs that require immediate action as a result of: (1) material existing or potential unsafe conditions, (2) material building or fire code violations, or (3) conditions that, if not addressed, have the potential to result in, or contribute to, critical element or system failure within one year or will most probably result in a significant escalation of its remedial cost. 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves Replacement Reserves are for recurring probable expenditures, which are not classified as operation or maintenance expenses. The replacement reserves should be budgeted for in advance on an annual basis. Replacement Reserves are reasonably predictable both in terms of frequency and cost. However, Replacement Reserves may also include components or systems that have an indeterminable life but, nonetheless, have a potential for failure within an estimated time period. Replacement Reserves exclude systems or components that are estimated to expire after the reserve term and are not considered material to the structural and mechanical integrity of the subject property. Furthermore, systems and components that are not deemed to have a material effect on the use of the Property are also excluded. Costs that are caused by acts of God, accidents, or other occurrences that are typically covered by insurance, rather than reserved for, are also excluded. Replacement costs are solicited from ownership/property management, EMG’s discussions with service companies, manufacturers' representatives, and previous experience in preparing such schedules for other similar facilities. Costs for work performed by the ownership’s or property management’s maintenance staff are also considered. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 5 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 EMG’s reserve methodology involves identification and quantification of those systems or components requiring capital reserve funds within the assessment period. The assessment period is defined as the effective age plus the reserve term. Additional information concerning system’s or component’s respective replacement costs (in today's dollars), typical expected useful lives, and remaining useful lives were estimated so that a funding schedule could be prepared. The Replacement Reserves Schedule presupposes that all required remedial work has been performed or that monies for remediation have been budgeted for items defined in the Immediate Repair Cost Estimate. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 6 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2. Purpose and Scope 2.1. Purpose EMG was retained by the client to render an opinion as to the Property’s current general physical condition on the day of the site visit. Based on the observations, interviews and document review outlined below, this report identifies significant deferred maintenance issues, existing deficiencies, and material code violations of record at municipal offices, which affect the Property’s use. Opinions are rendered as to its structural integrity, building system condition and the Property’s overall condition. The report also notes building systems or components that have realized or exceeded their typical expected useful lives. CONDITIONS: The physical condition of building systems and related components are typically defined as being in one of five conditions: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Failed or a combination thereof. For the purposes of this report, the following definitions are used: Excellent = New or very close to new; component or system typically has been installed within the past year, sound and performing its function. Eventual repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Good = Satisfactory as-is. Component or system is sound and performing its function, typically within the first third of its lifecycle. However, it may show minor signs of normal wear and tear. Repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Fair = Showing signs of wear and use but still satisfactory as-is, typically near the median of its estimated useful life. Component or system is performing adequately at this time but may exhibit some signs of wear, deferred maintenance, or evidence of previous repairs. Repair or replacement will be required due to the component or system’s condition and/or its estimated remaining useful life. Poor = Component or system is significantly aged, flawed, functioning intermittently or unreliably; displays obvious signs of deferred maintenance; shows evidence of previous repair or workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards; has become obsolete; or exhibits an inherent deficiency. The present condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of contiguous elements or systems. Either full component replacement is needed or repairs are required to restore to good condition, prevent premature failure, and/or prolong useful life. Failed = Component or system has ceased functioning or performing as intended. Replacement, repair, or other significant corrective action is recommended or required. Not Applicable = Assigning a condition does not apply or make logical sense, most commonly due to the item in question not being present. FORMAT OF THE BODY OF THE REPORT: Throughout sections 5 through 9 of this report, each report section will typically contain three subsections organized in the following sequence:  A descriptive table (and/or narrative), which identifies the components assessed, their condition, and other key data points.  A simple bulleted list of Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements, which lists components and assets typically in Excellent, Good, or Fair condition at the time of the assessment but that will require replacement or some other attention once aged past their estimated useful life. These listed components are typically included in the associated inventory database with costs identified and budgeted beyond the first several years.  A bulleted cluster of Actions/Comments, which include more detailed narratives describing deficiencies, recommended repairs, and short term replacements. The assets and components associated with these bullets are/were typically problematic and in Poor or Failed condition at the time of the assessment, with corresponding costs included within the first few years. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 7 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PLAN TYPES: Each line item in the cost database is assigned a Plan Type, which is the primary reason or rationale for the recommended replacement, repair, or other corrective action. This is the “why” part of the equation. A cost or line item may commonly have more than one applicable Plan Type; however, only one Plan Type will be assigned based on the “best” fit, typically the one with the greatest significance. The following Plan Types are listed in general weighted order of importance: Safety = An observed or reported unsafe condition that if left unaddressed could result in an injury; a system or component that presents a potential liability risk. Performance/Integrity = Component or system has failed, is almost failing, performs unreliably, does not perform as intended, and/or poses a risk to overall system stability. Accessibility = Does not meet ADA, UFAS, and/or other handicap accessibility requirements. Environmental = Improvements to air or water quality, including removal of hazardous materials from the building or site. Modernization/Adaptation = Conditions, systems, or spaces that need to be upgraded in appearance or function to meet current standards, facility usage, or client/occupant needs. Lifecycle/Renewal = Any component or system in which future repair or replacement is anticipated beyond the next several years and/or is of minimal substantial early-term consequence. 2.2. Scope The standard scope of the Facility Condition Assessment includes the following:  Visit the Property to evaluate the general condition of the building and site improvements, review available construction documents in order to familiarize ourselves with, and be able to comment on, the in-place construction systems, life safety, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and the general built environment.  Identify those components that are exhibiting deferred maintenance issues and provide cost estimates for Immediate Costs and Replacement Reserves based on observed conditions, maintenance history and industry standard useful life estimates. This will include the review of documented capital improvements completed within the last five-year period and work currently contracted for, if applicable.  Provide a full description of the Property with descriptions of in-place systems and commentary on observed conditions.  Provide a general statement of the subject Property’s compliance to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This will not constitute a full ADA survey, but will help identify exposure to issues and the need for further review.  Perform a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) for the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. EMG will also interview Project personnel regarding the presence of any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Potentially affected areas will be photographed. Sampling will not be considered in routine assessments.  List the current utility service providers.  Review maintenance records and procedures with the in-place maintenance personnel.  Observe a representative sample of the interior spaces/units, including vacant spaces/units, in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas to be observed include the exterior of the property, the roofs, interior common areas, and the significant mechanical, electrical and elevator equipment rooms.  Provide recommendations for additional studies, if required, with related budgetary information.  Provide an Executive Summary at the beginning of this report.  Prepare a mechanical equipment inventory list. 2.3. Personnel Interviewed The management staff was interviewed for specific information relating to the physical property, available maintenance procedures, historical performance of key building systems and components, available drawings and other documentation. The following personnel from the facility and government agencies were interviewed in the process of conducting the FCA: Name and Title Organization Phone Number Peter Ratos Building Code Official City of Yorkville 630.553.8574 HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 8 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 The FCA was performed with the assistance of Peter Ratos, Building Code Official, City of Yorkville, the onsite Point of Contact (POC), who was cooperative and provided information that appeared to be accurate based upon subsequent site observations. The onsite contact is completely knowledgeable about the subject property and answered most questions posed during the interview process. The POC’s involvement with the property has spanned the past 6 years. 2.4. Documentation Reviewed Prior to the FCA, relevant documentation was requested that could aid in the knowledge of the subject property’s physical improvements, extent and type of use, and/or assist in identifying material discrepancies between reported information and observed conditions. The review of submitted documents does not include comment on the accuracy of such documents or their preparation, methodology, or protocol. The Documentation Request Form is provided in Appendix E. 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire A Pre-Survey Questionnaire was sent to the POC prior to the site visit. The questionnaire is included in Appendix E. Information obtained from the questionnaire has been used in preparation of this report. 2.6. Weather Conditions 5/17/17: Clear to partly cloudy, with temperatures in the 70s (°F) and moderate winds. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 9 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 3. Accessibility and Property Research 3.1. ADA Accessibility Generally, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by entities to access and use of “areas of public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” on the basis of disability. Regardless of its age, these areas and facilities must be maintained and operated to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). Buildings completed and occupied after January 26, 1992 are required to comply fully with the ADAAG. Existing facilities constructed prior to this date are held to the lesser standard of compliance to the extent allowed by structural feasibility and the financial resources available. As an alternative, a reasonable accommodation pertaining to the deficiency must be made. During the FCA, a limited visual observation for ADA accessibility compliance was conducted. The scope of the visual observation was limited to those areas set forth in EMG’s Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist provided in Appendix D of this report. It is understood by the Client that the limited observations described herein does not comprise a full ADA Compliance Survey, and that such a survey is beyond the scope of EMG’s undertaking. Only a representative sample of areas was observed and, other than as shown on the Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist, actual measurements were not taken to verify compliance. The facility does not appear to be accessible with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Elements as defined by the ADAAG that are not accessible as stated within the priorities of Title III, are as follows: Parking  Adequate number of designated parking stalls and signage for vans are not provided. Paths of Travel  Door thresholds do not allow for wheelchair access Restrooms.  Restrooms do not meet any ADA accessibility criteria. A full ADA Compliance Survey may reveal additional aspects of the property that are not in compliance. Corrections of these conditions should be addressed from a liability standpoint, but are not necessarily code violations. The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines concern civil rights issues as they pertain to the disabled and are not a construction code, although many local jurisdictions have adopted the Guidelines as such. Because this facility is currently unused and no major renovations are currently planned, the cost to address the achievable items noted above is not included in the cost tables. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 10 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 4. Existing Building Assessment 4.1. Unit or Space Types All 5,000 square feet of the building are currently unoccupied. The facility was previously used as the Yorkville Sherrif’s office and jail. The spaces are vacant. Primary building areas include: living quarters, the jail/holding area, a garage, office space, and an unfinished basement. 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed All of the interior spaces were observed in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas accessed included the site within the property boundaries, exterior of the property and the roof (observed from the ground). Areas of note that were either inaccessible or not observed for other reasons are listed in the table below: A “down unit” or area is a term used to describe a unit or space that cannot be occupied due to poor conditions such as fire damage, water damage, missing equipment, damaged floor, wall or ceiling surfaces, or other significant deficiencies. There are substantial portion of the facility that are down, and the entire facility is considered to be a down area. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 11 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 5. Site Improvements 5.1. Utilities The following table identifies the utility suppliers and the condition and adequacy of the services. Site Utilities Utility Supplier Condition and Adequacy Sanitary sewer City of Yorkville Good and Adequate Storm sewer City of Yorkville Good and Adequate Domestic water City of Yorkville Good and Adequate Electric service Commonwealth Edison Good and Adequate Natural gas service Nicor Gas Good and Adequate Actions/Comments:  According to the POC, the utilities provided are adequate for the property. There are no unique, onsite utility systems such as emergency electrical generators, septic systems, water or waste water treatment plants, or propane gas tanks. 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks Item Description Main Ingress and Egress West Madison Street Access from South Additional Entrances NA Additional Access from NA Paving and Flatwork Item Material Last Work Done Condition Entrance Driveway Apron None -- -- Parking Lot Asphalt 2010 Good Drive Aisles None -- -- Service Aisles None -- -- Sidewalks Concrete 2010 Good Curbs Concrete 2010 Good Site Stairs Concrete 1970 Poor Pedestrian Ramps None -- -- HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 12 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Parking Count Open Lot Carport Private Garage Subterranean Garage Freestanding Parking Structure 3 - - - - Total Number of ADA Compliant Spaces 1 Number of ADA Compliant Spaces for Vans 0 Total Parking Spaces 3 Parking Ratio (Spaces/Apartments) NA Method of Obtaining Parking Count Physical count Exterior Stairs Location Material Handrails Condition East wall of building Concrete stairs None Poor Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Asphalt seal coating  Asphalt pavement milling and overlaying  Sidewalks  Concrete stairs Actions/Comments:  The concrete site stairs at the northeast corner of the facility are in poor condition. The steps are spalling and deteriorated. Replacement of these concrete stairs is recommended. 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control Drainage System and Erosion Control System Exists At Site Condition Surface Flow ☐ -- Inlets ☒ Fair Swales ☒ Fair Detention pond ☐ -- Lagoons ☐ -- Ponds ☐ -- Underground Piping ☒ Fair Pits ☐ -- Municipal System ☒ Fair Dry Well ☐ -- HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 13 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  There is no evidence of storm water runoff from adjacent properties. The storm water system appears to provide adequate runoff capacity. There is no evidence of major ponding or erosion 5.4. Topography and Landscaping Item Description Site Topography Slopes moderately down from the south side of the property to the north property line. Landscaping Trees Grass Flower Beds Planters Drought Tolerant Plants Decorative Stone None ☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Landscaping Condition Fair Irrigation Automatic Underground Drip Hand Watering None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Irrigation Condition -- Retaining Walls Type Location Condition None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The topography and adjacent uses do not appear to present conditions detrimental to the property. There are no significant areas of erosion. 5.5. General Site Improvements Property Signage Property Signage Building mounted Street Address Displayed? Yes HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 14 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Site and Building Lighting Site Lighting None Pole Mounted Bollard Lights Ground Mounted Parking Lot Pole Type ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ -- Building Lighting None Wall Mounted Recessed Soffit ☐ ☒ ☐ Poor REFUSE DISPOSAL Refuse Disposal Individual garbage bins Dumpster Locations Mounting Enclosure Contracted? Condition NA - vacant None None NA -- Other Site Amenities Description Location Condition Playground Equipment None -- -- Tennis Courts None -- -- Basketball Court None -- -- Swimming Pool None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Exterior lighting Actions/Comments:  The exterior lighting fixture is aged. Replacement is recommended. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 15 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems 6.1. Foundations Building Foundation Item Description Condition Foundation Concrete foundation walls Fair Basement and Crawl Space Concrete slab and concrete walls Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  Isolated areas of the foundation systems are exposed, which allows for limited observation. The foundation systems are concealed. There are no significant signs of settlement, deflection, or movement. The basement walls appear intact and structurally sound. There is no evidence of movement or water infiltration. 6.2. Superstructure Building Superstructure Item Description Condition Framing / Load-Bearing Walls Conventional wood/metal studs Fair Ground Floor Raised wood or concrete slab Fair Upper Floor Framing Wood joists Fair to Poor Upper Floor Decking Wood or concrete, cast-in-place Fair to Poor Roof Framing Wood trusses Fair to Poor Roof Decking Wood boards or plywood Fair to Poor Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The superstructure is exposed in some locations, which allows for limited observation. There is significant evidence of structural damage due to water intrusion in the central hallway on the First and Second Floors. This condition appears to affect the rafters, joists, and studs in these areas as well as the floor and roof decking. A Professional Engineer with specific expertise in structural design and construction in this geographical area must be retained to evaluate the structure and to provide remedial recommendations consistent with local regulatory and code requirements. Although the estimated cost of repair cannot be accurately determined without the recommended study, a budgetary cost allowance to repair the affected elements is also included. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 16 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6.3. Roofing Primary Roof Type / Geometry Hip Roof Finish Asphalt shingles Maintenance In-house Staff Roof Age 50 Yrs Flashing Sheet metal Warranties None Parapet Copings Exposed copings Roof Drains Gutters and downspouts Fascia Concrete cornice Metal panel fascia Insulation Fiberglass batts Soffits Exposed Soffits Skylights No Attics Yes Ponding No Ventilation Source-1 Gable end vents Leaks Observed Yes Ventilation Source-2 None Roof Condition Failed The primary roof is located over the majority of the building. The roof valley at the intersection between the older and newer portions of the building is clad with a TPO membrane. Secondary Roof Type / Geometry Flat Finish Single-ply membrane Maintenance In-house Staff Roof Age 50 Yrs Flashing Sheet metal Warranties Unknown Parapet Copings None Roof Drains Gutters and downspouts Fascia Metal Panel Insulation Rigid Board Soffits None Skylights No Attics None Ponding No Ventilation Source-1 Power Vents Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 None Roof Condition Poor The secondary roof is located at a small area at the south end of the facility. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  TPO roof membrane  Asphalt shingles Actions/Comments:  The roof finishes appear to be more than 30 years old. Information regarding roof warranties or bonds was not available. The roofs are maintained by the in-house maintenance staff.  There is evidence of active roof leaks. There are areas of severe water damage within several areas of the building. The most severe area of water damage was observed at the central hallway of the facility. The water damage in this area is extensive and affects the upper and lower levels. All active leaks must be repaired. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 17 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660  The roof sheathing exhibits signs of significant areas of sagging and visible penetrations. This condition is indicative of substrate damage. The damaged areas must be repaired or replaced. The cost of this work is included with the roof finish replacement costs.  The roof insulation has significant areas of missing or water damaged materials. This condition is present in several locations, most notably at the central hallway mentioned above. New insulation must be installed in this area. 6.4. Exterior Walls Building Exterior Walls Type Location Condition Primary Finish Brick veneer Fair to Poor Secondary Finish Field stone Fair to Poor Accented with Concrete Fair to Poor Soffits Exposed Fair Building sealants (caulking) are located between dissimilar materials, at joints, and around window and door openings. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Caulking  Masonry re-pointing Actions/Comments:  Significant portions of the mortar joints along the brick veneer and stone veneer are cracked at the front elevation, east elevation, and north elevation of the older portion of the facility. The damaged mortar joints must be cleaned and re-pointed.  The brick masonry has isolated areas of efflorescence at the front elevation of the building. The affected areas of brick masonry must be cleaned and an efflorescence-checking coating must also be applied to the brick masonry. 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs Building Exterior and Interior Stairs Type Description Riser Handrail Balusters Condition Building Exterior Stairs Cast in place concrete Closed None None Poor Building Interior Stairs Steel-framed with pre-cast treads Open Metal Metal Poor Building Interior Stairs Wood-framed Closed Wood None Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The interior metal stairs at the south stairwell have suffered extensive water damage from the active roof leak in this area. The stairs are severely corroded and will require replacement.  The exterior concrete steps leading to the basement boiler room are spalling and uneven. Replacement of these steps is recommended. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 18 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors Building Windows Window Framing Glazing Location Window Screen Condition Wood framed, operable Single glaze Throughout building ☐ Poor to Failed Building Doors Main Entrance Doors Door Type Condition Wood, partially or fully glazed Poor Secondary Entrance Doors Solid core wood Poor Service Doors None -- Overhead Doors Wood Poor Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Wooden windows  Glazed doors  Solid door  Overhead door Actions/Comments:  The windows are antiquated, energy-inefficient units with single-pane glazing. Some of the windows are difficult to open and close and several of the windows were loose in their sashes. Replacement of the deteriorated windows is recommended.  Several windows were rendered unnecessary as a result of the building renovations. These windows look onto interior structural elements of the building or have been covered entirely. These interior windows are not included in the replacement costs.  The exterior doors are antiquated and in poor condition. The basement door does not close properly, the upper floor stairwell door has a cracked pane of glass, and the main entry door has a single pane of glazing. Replacement of all of the exterior doors is recommended. 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony Not applicable. There are no patios, terraces, or balconies. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 19 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems See the Mechanical Equipment List in the Appendices for the quantity, manufacturer’s name, model number, capacity and year of manufacturer of the major mechanical equipment, if available. 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Building Central Heating System Primary Heating System Type Hot water boiler Forced air furnace Quantity and Capacity of Major Components 1 boiler at 250 MBH (estimated) 1 furnace at 90 MBH Total Heating Capacity 340 MBH Heating Fuel Natural gas Location of Major Equipment Basement Garage mechanical room Space Served by System Older portion of building Newer portion of building Age Ranges 1930s (estimated) 1978 Condition Poor Heat Exchanger Condition -- Distribution System HVAC Water Distribution System Two-pipe Heating Water Circulation Pump Size and Quantity None Pump Condition -- Air Distribution System NA Quantity and Capacity of Air Handlers NA Location of Air Handlers -- Large Spaces the Larger Dedicated AHU’s Serve NA Age of Air Handlers NA Air Handler Condition -- Terminal Units Radiators Quantity and Capacity of Terminal Units Five cast-iron radiators Location of Terminal Units Throughout older portion of building Spaces Served by Terminal Units Older portion of building HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 20 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Distribution System Terminal Unit Condition Poor Controls and Ventilation HVAC Control System Individual non-programmable thermostats/controls HVAC Control System Condition Poor Building Ventilation Natural ventilation only Ventilation System Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The HVAC systems are maintained by the in-house staff. It is unknown whether records of the installation, maintenance, upgrades, and replacement of the HVAC equipment at the property have been maintained.  Approximately 50 percent of the HVAC equipment is original. The HVAC equipment varies in age. All of the equipment is antiquated. HVAC equipment is replaced on an "as needed" basis.  The HVAC equipment is non-functional. The property management staff was interviewed about the historical and recent performance of the equipment and systems. The systems are antiquated and the management staff stated that the systems are unused. The facility is vacant and the systems are not necessary. The facility is unused and there are no immediate plans to renovate the building or restore the facility to a functional state. Replacement of the HVAC components is not recommended. 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water Building Plumbing System Type Description Condition Water Supply Piping Copper and galvanized iron Fair to poor Waste/Sewer Piping Cast iron Fair Vent Piping Cast iron Fair Water Meter Location Basement Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Components Water Heater Fuel Natural gas Quantity and Input Capacity 1 unit at 45 MBH Storage Capacity 40 gallons Boiler or Water Heater Condition Poor Supplementary Storage Tanks? Yes Storage Tank Quantity and Volume 2 at 30 gallons each Quantity of Storage Tanks 0 HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 21 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Storage Tank Condition -- Domestic Hot Water Circulation Pumps (3 HP and over) No Adequacy of Hot Water Unknown Adequacy of Water Pressure Unknown Plumbing Fixtures Water Closets Commercial and residential Toilet (Water Closet) Flush Rating 1.6 to 3.5 GPF Common Area Faucet Nominal Flow Rate 2.0 GPM Condition Poor Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  Most of the domestic water lines are galvanized iron original to the 1970s renovation. The plumbing system is currently unused and has not been functional for a significant period of time. It is quite common for galvanized iron piping to develop problems due to long- term corrosion with thinning walls and/or interior mineral deposit accumulation, especially once it has aged 40 or 50 years. As such, EMG recommends replacing all the plumbing supply lines with copper. The facility is unused and there are no immediate plans to renovate the building or restore the facility to a functional state. Replacement of the domestic plumbing components is not recommended.  The restroom accessories and fixtures appear outdated and exhibit significant evidence of heavy wear or damage. The plumbing fixtures in the First Floor restroom, except for the toilet, are missing. The facility is unused and there are no immediate plans to renovate the building or restore the facility to a functional state. Replacement of the plumbing fixtures is not recommended. 7.3. Building Gas Distribution Gas service is supplied from the gas main on the adjacent public street. The gas meter and regulator is located along the exterior wall of the building. The gas distribution piping within the building is malleable steel (black iron). Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The pressure and quantity of gas appear to be adequate.  The gas meters and regulators appear to be functioning adequately and will require routine maintenance.  Only limited observation of the gas distribution piping can be made due to hidden conditions. 7.4. Building Electrical Building Electrical Systems Electrical Lines Overhead Transformer Pole-mounted HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 22 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Building Electrical Systems Main Service Size 200 Amps Volts 120/208 Volt, three-phase Meter and Panel Location Basement Branch Wiring Copper Conduit Metallic Step-Down Transformers? No Security / Surveillance System? No Building Intercom System? No Lighting Fixtures Incandescent and T-12 Main Distribution Condition Poor Secondary Panel and Transformer Condition Poor Lighting Condition Poor Building Emergency System Size None Fuel NA Generator / UPS Serves NA Tank Location NA Testing Frequency NA Tank Type NA Generator / UPS Condition -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The onsite electrical systems up to the meters are owned and maintained by the respective utility company.  The electrical service and capacity appear to be adequate for the property’s demands.  The panels and wiring are a mix of 1978 components and 1950s components. Despite the age of the electrical components, because the facility is unused and there are no immediate plans to renovate the building or restore the facility to a functional state, an upgrade of the electrical systems is not recommended.  The light fixtures throughout a portion of the facility utilize older, inefficient T-12 lamps. The facility is unused and there are no immediate plans to renovate the building or restore the facility to a functional state, an upgrade of the lighting fixtures is not recommended 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems Not applicable. There are no elevators or conveying systems. 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems Item Description Type None HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 23 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Item Description Type None Fire Alarm System Central Alarm Panel ☐ Battery-Operated Smoke Detectors ☐ Alarm Horns ☐ Annunciator Panels ☐ Hard-Wired Smoke Detectors ☐ Strobe Light Alarms ☐ Pull Stations ☐ Emergency Battery-Pack Lighting ☒ Illuminated EXIT Signs ☐ Alarm System Condition Failed Sprinkler System None ☒ Standpipes ☐ Backflow Preventer ☐ Hose Cabinets ☐ Fire Pumps ☐ Siamese Connections ☐ Suppression Condition Fair Central Alarm Panel System Location of Alarm Panel Installation Date of Alarm Panel None NA Fire Extinguishers Last Service Date Servicing Current? October, 2010 No Hydrant Location Adjacent streets Siamese Location None Special Systems Kitchen Suppression System ☐Computer Room Suppression System ☐ Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Backup light fixture Actions/Comments:  The fire extinguishers have not been inspected within the last year. A qualified fire equipment contractor must inspect and service the fire extinguishers.  Fire extinguishers appear to be missing at many locations. New fire extinguishers must be installed at all required locations immediately.  The only backup light fixture at the building is in the central hallway on the Second Floor. The light fixture appears to be failed.  The fire alarm systems are largely nonexistent and are not up to current standards. The system lacks smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, strobe alarms, pull stations, and older non-illuminated exit signs. The facility is unused and there are no immediate plans to renovate the building or restore the facility to a functional state. An upgrade of the fire alarm system is not recommended  The building is not protected by fire suppression. Due to its construction date, the facility is most likely “grandfathered” by code and the installation of fire sprinklers not required until major renovations are performed. The facility is unused and there are no immediate plans to renovate the building or restore the facility to a functional state. Installation of a fire suppression system is not recommended HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 24 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 8. Interior Spaces 8.1. Interior Finishes All 5,000 square feet of the building are currently unoccupied. The facility was previously used as the Yorkville Sherrif’s office and jail. The spaces are vacant. Primary building areas include: living quarters, the jail/holding area, a garage, office space, and an unfinished basement. The following table generally describes the locations and typical conditions of the interior finishes within the facility: Typical Floor Finishes Floor Finish Locations General Condition Unfinished (wood) Older area of building on First and Second Floors Poor Carpet Second Floor central hallway and newer area of Second Floor Poor to Failed Vinyl tile First Floor hallway, Second Floor restroom and kitchen Poor Linoleum Old kitchen area Poor to Failed Concrete Garage, jail area, basement Poor Typical Wall Finishes Wall Finish Locations General Condition Painted drywall Newer area of building Poor Painted plaster Older area of building Poor Unfinished Garage, basement Poor Painted concrete Jail area Poor Wooden wainscoting Third Floor of old section of building Poor Typical Ceiling Finishes Ceiling Finish Locations General Condition Painted drywall Some areas of basement, upper floor restrooms, stairwells Poor Painted plaster Small vault, upper floor Poor Painted concrete Jail area Poor Unfinished Basement Poor Wooden wainscoting Third Floor of old section of building Poor HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 25 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Interior Doors Item Type Condition Interior Doors Hollow core Poor Door Framing Wood Poor Fire Doors No Poor Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The interior areas were last partially renovated around 2000.  The interior finishes have mostly been removed from the facility. The remaining interior finishes area aged, worn, and generally in poor to failed condition. The facility is unused and there are no immediate plans to renovate the building or restore the facility to a functional state. Replacement of the interior finishes is not recommended  The ceilings have significant areas of water-damage in the central hallway and several isolated area of physical damage from animals on the Third Floor of the old section of the facility and the Second Floor of the newer section of the facility. The damaged ceiling areas need to be replaced.  There are significant areas of water-damaged and physically damaged wall finishes throughout the building. The most severely damaged areas are located in the central hallway of the facility. The damaged wall areas need to be replaced. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 26 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 9. Other Structures Not applicable. There are no major accessory structures. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 27 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 10. Certification The City of Yorkville retained EMG to perform this Facility Condition Assessment in connection with its continued operation of Historic Jail, 111 West Madison Street, Yorkville, Illinois, the “Property”. It is our understanding that the primary interest of the City of Yorkville is to locate and evaluate materials and building system defects that might significantly affect the value of the property and to determine if the present Property has conditions that will have a significant impact on its continued operations. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the brief review of the plans and records made available to our Project Manager during the site visit, interviews of available property management personnel and maintenance contractors familiar with the Property, appropriate inquiry of municipal authorities, our Project Manager’s walk-through observations during the site visit, and our experience with similar properties. No testing, exploratory probing, dismantling or operating of equipment or in depth studies were performed unless specifically required under Section 2 of this report. This assessment did not include engineering calculations to determine the adequacy of the Property’s original design or existing systems. Although walk-through observations were performed, not all areas were observed (See Section 4.2 for areas observed). There may be defects in the Property, which were in areas not observed or readily accessible, may not have been visible, or were not disclosed by management personnel when questioned. The report describes property conditions at the time that the observations and research were conducted. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for the use of the City of Yorkville for the purpose stated within Section 2 of this report. The report, or any excerpt thereof, shall not be used by any party other than the City of Yorkville or for any other purpose than that specifically stated in our agreement or within Section 2 of this report without the express written consent of EMG. Any reuse or distribution of this report without such consent shall be at the City of Yorkville and the recipient’s sole risk, without liability to EMG. Prepared by: Kevin Koranda, Project Manager Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 28 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 11. Appendices Appendix A: Photographic Record Appendix B: Site Plan Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Appendix D: Pre-Survey Questionnaire HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix A: Photographic Record HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #1: FRONT ELEVATION PHOTO #2: EAST ELEVATION PHOTO #3: NORTH ELEVATION PHOTO #4: WEST ELEVATION PHOTO #5: CURB CUTAWAY PHOTO #6: SIDEWALK HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #7: ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE PHOTO #8: CORNICE AND SHINGLES PHOTO #9: ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF, DETERIORATING PHOTO #10: EFFLORESCENCE AND DETERIORATED MORTAR PHOTO #11: MISSING MORTAR PHOTO #12: MISSING MORTAR HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #13: WINDOW, WOOD FRAME, SINGLE PANE PHOTO #14: GARAGE DOOR, WOOD PHOTO #15: FOUNDATION WALL, MISSING MORTAR, LOOSE STONES PHOTO #16: EFFLORESCENCE AND MISSING MORTAR PHOTO #17: CHIMNEY, DETERIORATING PHOTO #18: CONDENSING UNIT HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #19: RADIATOR PHOTO #20: EXPANSION TANKS, JAIL AREA PHOTO #21: EXTINGUISHER PHOTO #22: LOAD CENTER PHOTO #23: SANITARY PIPING PHOTO #24: DOMESTIC WATER HEATER HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #25: FURNACE PHOTO #26: CIRCUIT BREAKER PHOTO #27: WATER SOFTENER PHOTO #28: BOILER PHOTO #29: EXPANSION TANK PHOTO #30: OLD KITCHEN AREA HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #31: METAL STAIRS, JAIL PHOTO #32: CELLS PHOTO #33: CELL TOILET PHOTO #34: CELL INTERIOR PHOTO #35: CENTRAL HALLWAY PHOTO #36: WATER DAMAGE, CENTRAL HALLWAY HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #37: SOUTH STAIRS PHOTO #38: WATER DAMAGE, SECOND FLOOR, SOUTH STAIRS PHOTO #39: WATER DAMAGE PHOTO #40: FUNGAL GROWTH PHOTO #41: GARAGE AREA PHOTO #42: GARAGE DOOR HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #43: GARAGE DOOR OPENER PHOTO #44: GARAGE UTILITY AND STORAGE AREA PHOTO #45: SECOND FLOOR CENTRAL HALLWAY, MOSS GROWING FROM CARPET PHOTO #46: SECOND FLOOR CENTRAL HALLWAY, CEILING PHOTO #47: SECOND FLOOR, NEW WING, DAMAGED CEILING PHOTO #48: SECOND FLOOR RESTROOM, NEW WING HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #49: SECOND FLOOR OFFICE AREA, CARPET PHOTO #50: WATER DAMAGED CEILING PHOTO #51: LIVING QUARTERS, RESTROOM PHOTO #52: LIVING QUARTERS PHOTO #53: LIVING QUARTERS PHOTO #54: FUNGAL GROWTH HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PHOTO #55: LIVING QUARTERS, THIRD FLOOR PHOTO #56: LIVING QUARTERS, THIRD FLOOR PHOTO #57: WATER DAMAGE, THIRD FLOOR PHOTO #58: BASEMENT PHOTO #59: BASEMENT CONDUIT PHOTO #60: CORRUGATED STEEL ARCH FIRST FLOOR FRAMING HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix B: Site Plan Site Plan Project Name: Historic Jail Project Number: 122700.17R000-003.322 Source: Google Earth Pro On-Site Date: May 17, 2017 HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Page 1 of 4 Date Completed: May 17, 2017 Property Name: Historic Jail EMG Project Number: 122700.17R000-003.322 Building History Yes No Unk Comments 1 Has an ADA survey previously been completed for this property? ✔ 2 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? ✔ Parking area only 3 Does a Transition Plan / Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? ✔ 4 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints that have not been resolved? ✔ 5 Is any litigation pending related to ADA issues? ✔ Parking Yes No NA Comments 1 Are there sufficient accessible parking spaces with respect to the total number of reported spaces? ✔ 2 Are there sufficient van-accessible parking spaces available? ✔ None 3 Are accessible spaces marked with the International Symbol of Accessibility? Are there signs reading “Van Accessible” at van spaces? ✔ 4 Is there at least one accessible route provided within the boundary of the site from public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones, if provided, and public streets and sidewalks? ✔ 5 Do curbs on the accessible route have depressed, ramped curb cuts at drives, paths, and drop-offs? ✔ 6 If required does signage exist directing you to accessible parking and an accessible building entrance? ✔ Ramps Yes No NA Comments 1* Do all ramps along accessible path of travel appear to meet slope requirements? ( 1:12 or less) ✔ 2 Are ramps that appear longer than 6 ft complete with railings on both sides? ✔ 3 Does the width between railings appear at least 36 inches? ✔ Page 2 of 4 Ramps (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 4 Is there a level landing for approximately every 30 ft horizontal length of ramp, at the top and at the bottom of ramps and switchbacks? ✔ Entrances/Exits Yes No NA Comments 1 Do all required accessible entrance doorways appear at least 32 inches wide and not a revolving door? ✔ 2 If the main entrance is inaccessible, are there alternate accessible entrances? ✔ 3 Is the door hardware easy to operate (lever/push type hardware, no twisting required and not higher than approximately 48 inches above the floor)? ✔ Paths of Travel Yes No NA Comments 1 Are all paths of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair (appear at least 36 inches wide)? ✔ 2 Are wheelchair-accessible facilities (toilet rooms, exits, etc.) identified with signage? ✔ 3 Is there a path of travel that does not require the use of stairs? ✔ Elevators Yes No NA Comments 1 Do the call buttons have visual and audible signals to indicate when a call is registered and answered when car arrives? ✔ 2 Are there visual and audible signals inside cars indicating floor change? ✔ 3 Are there standard raised and Braille marking on both jambs of each hoist way entrance as well as all cab/call buttons? ✔ 4 Do elevator doors have a reopening device that will stop and reopen a car door if an object or a person obstructs the door? ✔ 5 Are elevator controls low enough to be reached from a wheelchair (appears to be between 15 and 48 inches)? ✔ 6 If a two-way emergency communication system is provided within the elevator cab, is it usable without voice communication? ✔ Page 3 of 4 Toilet Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 Are common area public restrooms located on an accessible route? ✔ 2 Are pull handles push/pull or lever type? ✔ 3 Are there audible and visual fire alarm devices in the toilet rooms? ✔ 4 Are toilet room access doors wheelchair- accessible (appear to be at least 32 inches wide)? ✔ 5 Are public restrooms large enough to accommodate a wheelchair turnaround (appear to have 60” turning diameter)? ✔ 6 In unisex toilet rooms, are there safety alarms with pull cords? ✔ 7 Are toilet stall doors wheelchair accessible (appear to be at least 32” wide)? ✔ 8 Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? ✔ 9 Are sinks provided with clearance for a wheelchair to roll under (appear to have 29” clearance)? ✔ 10 Are sink handles operable with one hand without grasping, pinching or twisting? ✔ 11 Are exposed pipes under sink sufficiently insulated against contact? ✔ Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 How many total accessible sleeping rooms does the property management report to have? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible sleeping rooms with respect to the total number of reported guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. ✔ Page 4 of 4 Guest Rooms (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 2 How many of the accessible sleeping rooms per property management have roll- in showers? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible rooms with roll-in showers with respect to the total number of reported accessible guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. ✔ 3 How many assistive listening kits and/or rooms with communication features are available per property management? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported assistive listening devices with respect to the total number of rooms? See attached hot sheet. ✔ Pools Yes No NA Comments 1 Are public access pools provided? If the answer is no, please disregard this section. ✔ 2 How many accessible access points are provided to each pool/spa? Provide number in comment field. Is at least one fixed lift or sloped entry to the pool provided? ✔ Play Area Yes No NA Comments 1 Has the play area been reviewed for accessibility? All public playgrounds are subject to ADAAG standards. ✔ Exercise Equipment Yes No NA Comments 1 Does there appear to be adequate clear floor space around the machines/equipment (30” by 48” minimum)? ✔ *Based on visual observation only. The slope was not confirmed through measurements. HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix D: Pre-Survey Questionnaire HISTORIC JAIL EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-003.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 On the day of the site visit, provide EMG's Field Observer access to all of the available documents listed below. Provide copies if possible. INFORMATION REQUIRED 1. All available construction documents (blueprints) for the original construction of the building or for any tenant improvement work or other recent construction work. 2. A site plan, preferably 8 1/2" X 11", which depicts the arrangement of buildings, roads, parking stalls, and other site features. 3. For commercial properties, provide a tenant list which identifies the names of each tenant, vacant tenant units, the floor area of each tenant space, and the gross and net leasable area of the building(s). 4. For apartment properties, provide a summary of the apartment unit types and apartment unit type quantities, including the floor area of each apartment unit as measured in square feet. 5. For hotel or nursing home properties, provide a summary of the room types and room type quantities. 6. Copies of Certificates of Occupancy, building permits, fire or health department inspection reports, elevator inspection certificates, roof or HVAC warranties, or any other similar, relevant documents. 7. The names of the local utility companies which serve the property, including the water, sewer, electric, gas, and phone companies. 8. The company name, phone number, and contact person of all outside vendors who serve the property, such as mechanical contractors, roof contractors, fire sprinkler or fire extinguisher testing contractors, and elevator contractors. 9. A summary of recent (over the last 5 years) capital improvement work which describes the scope of the work and the estimated cost of the improvements. Executed contracts or proposals for improvements. Historical costs for repairs, improvements, and replacements. 10. Records of system and material ages (roof, MEP, paving, finishes, furnishings). 11. Any brochures or marketing information. 12. Appraisal, either current or previously prepared. 13. Current occupancy percentage and typical turnover rate records (for commercial and apartment properties). 14. Previous reports pertaining to the physical condition of property. 15. ADA survey and status of improvements implemented. 16. Current / pending litigation related to property condition. Your timely compliance with this request is greatly appreciated. Prepared for: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT Public Works Garage (Frame Building) 185 Wolf Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560 PREPARED BY: EMG CONTACT: EMG Andrew Hupp 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Senior Engineering Consultant Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 800.733.0660 x6632 800.733.0660 arhupp@emgcorp.com www.EMGcorp.com EMG Project Number: Date of Report: On Site Date: 122700.17R000-041.322 July 18, 2017 June 26, 2017 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition ................................................................ 1 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations ...................................................................... 3 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Scope .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Personnel Interviewed ................................................................................................................. 6 2.4. Documentation Reviewed ........................................................................................................... 7 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire ........................................................................................................... 7 2.6. Weather Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 7 3. Accessibility and Property Research ................................................................................................. 8 3.1. ADA Accessibility ........................................................................................................................ 8 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone ................................................................ 8 4. Existing Building Assessment ............................................................................................................ 9 4.1. Unit or Space Types .................................................................................................................... 9 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed ...................................................................... 9 5. Site Improvements ............................................................................................................................. 10 5.1. Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 10 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks ................................................................................................ 10 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control .................................................................................... 11 5.4. Topography and Landscaping ................................................................................................... 12 5.5. General Site Improvements ....................................................................................................... 12 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems ............................................................................... 14 6.1. Foundations ............................................................................................................................... 14 6.2. Superstructure ........................................................................................................................... 14 6.3. Roofing ...................................................................................................................................... 14 6.4. Exterior Walls ............................................................................................................................ 15 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs ......................................................................................................... 16 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors ..................................................................................................... 16 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony ...................................................................................................... 17 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems .................................................................................. 18 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) ..................................................... 18 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water ............................................................................. 19 7.3. Building Gas Distribution ........................................................................................................... 20 7.4. Building Electrical ...................................................................................................................... 20 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems .............................................................................. 21 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems ....................................................................................... 21 7.7. Life Support Systems ................................................................................................................ 22 8. Interior Spaces .................................................................................................................................... 23 8.1. Interior Finishes ......................................................................................................................... 23 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment .............................................................................. 24 9. Other Structures ................................................................................................................................. 25 10. Certification ......................................................................................................................................... 26 11. Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 27 PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 1 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition The property information is summarized in the table below. More detailed descriptions may be found in the various sections of the report and in the Appendices. Property Information Address: 185 Wolf Street, Yorkville, IL 60560 Year Constructed/Renovated: 2008 Current Occupants: City of Yorkville Percent Utilization: 100% Management Point of Contact: City of Yorkville, Mr. Peter Ratos 630.553.8574 phone pratos@yorkville.il.us email Property Type: Office, Garage Site Area: 2.4 acres Building Area: 10,600 SF Number of Buildings: 1 Number of Stories: 1 Parking Type and Number of Spaces: 32 spaces in open lots. Building Construction: Steel frame with concrete-topped metal decks. Roof Construction: Sloped roofing with metal finish. Exterior Finishes: Metal Siding Heating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning: Condensing unit, Furnace, Ceiling Fans, and Unit Heaters. Fire and Life/Safety: Smoke detectors, strobes, extinguishers, exit signs, and carbon monoxide detectors. Dates of Visit: June 26, 2017 On-Site Point of Contact (POC): Tony Hule Assessment and Report Prepared by: Tammy Prusa Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 Systemic Condition Summary Site Fair HVAC Good PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 2 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Systemic Condition Summary Structure Good Plumbing Fair Roof Good Electrical Good Vertical Envelope Good Elevators -- Interiors Fair Fire -- The following bullet points highlight the most significant short term and modernization recommendations:  Installation of a complete Fire Alarm System  Installation of a complete Sprinkler System Generally, the property appears to have been constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained since it was first occupied and is in fair overall condition. The property has had no major capital improvements. The property is less than 9 years old and has not required any major capital improvements. 1.2. F acility Condition Index (FCI) One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate the FCI, which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. Two FCI ratios are calculated and presented, the Current Year and Ten-Year. The Current Year FCI is the ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to the building’s Current Replacement Value. Similarly, the Ten-Year FCI is the ratio of anticipated Capital Reserve Needs over the next ten years to the Current Replacement Value. Fci Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 3 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Good In new or well-maintained condition, with no visual evidence of wear, soiling or other deficiencies. 0% to 5% Fair Subjected to wear and soiling but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. > than 5% to 10% Poor Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. > than 10% to 60% Very Poor Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal is now necessary. > than 60% The graphs above and tables below represent summary-level findings for the FCA. The deficiencies identified in this assessment can be combined with potential new construction requirements to develop an overall strategy that can serve as the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy. Key findings from the assessment include: Key Finding Metric Current Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (IR)/(CRV) 5.9% Fair 10-Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (RR)/(CRV) 2.8% Good Current Replacement Value (CRV) 10,600 SF * 183.24 / SF = $1,832,371 Year 0 (Current Year) - Immediate Repairs (IR) $109,797 Years 1-10 – Replacement Reserves (RR) $53,136 Total Capital Needs $162,933 The major issues contributing to the Immediate Repair Costs and the Current Year FCI ratio are summarized below:  Installation of a complete Fire Alarm System  Installation of a complete Sprinkler System Further detail on the specific costs that make up the Immediate Repair Costs can be found in the cost tables at the beginning of this report. 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations As part of the FCA, a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) was performed to determine the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. Property personnel were interviewed concerning any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Sampling is not a part of this assessment. There are no visual indications of the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, or evidence of moisture in representative readily accessible areas of the property. 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost Cost estimates are attached at the front of this report (following the cover page). These estimates are based on Invoice or Bid Document/s provided either by the Owner/facility and construction costs developed by construction resources such as R.S. Means and Marshall & Swift, EMG’s experience with past costs for similar properties, city cost indexes, and assumptions regarding future economic conditions. Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary, order of magnitude budgets. Actual costs most probably will vary from the consultant’s opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy, quality of materials and installation, manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected, field conditions, whether a physical deficiency is repaired or replaced in whole, phasing of the work (if applicable), quality of contractor, quality of project management exercised, market conditions, and whether competitive pricing is solicited, etc. ASTM E2018-08 recognizes that certain opinions of probable costs cannot be developed within the scope of this guide without further study. Opinions of probable cost for further study should be included in the FCA. PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 4 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1.4.1. Methodology Based upon site observations, research, and judgment, along with referencing Expected Useful Life (EUL) tables from various industry sources, EMG opines as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement. Accurate historical replacement records, if provided, are typically the best source of information. Exposure to the elements, initial quality and installation, extent of use, the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised, etc., are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component. As a result, a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual chronological age. The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age. Projections of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) are based on continued use of the Property similar to the reported past use. Significant changes in occupants and/or usage may affect the service life of some systems or components. Where quantities could not be derived from an actual take-off, lump sum costs or allowances are used. Estimated costs are based on professional judgment and the probable or actual extent of the observed defect, inclusive of the cost to design, procure, construct and manage the corrections. 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs Immediate repairs are opinions of probable costs that require immediate action as a result of: (1) material existing or potential unsafe conditions, (2) material building or fire code violations, or (3) conditions that, if not addressed, have the potential to result in, or contribute to, critical element or system failure within one year or will most probably result in a significant escalation of its remedial cost. 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves Replacement Reserves are for recurring probable expenditures, which are not classified as operation or maintenance expenses. The replacement reserves should be budgeted for in advance on an annual basis. Replacement Reserves are reasonably predictable both in terms of frequency and cost. However, Replacement Reserves may also include components or systems that have an indeterminable life but, nonetheless, have a potential for failure within an estimated time period. Replacement Reserves exclude systems or components that are estimated to expire after the reserve term and are not considered material to the structural and mechanical integrity of the subject property. Furthermore, systems and components that are not deemed to have a material effect on the use of the Property are also excluded. Costs that are caused by acts of God, accidents, or other occurrences that are typically covered by insurance, rather than reserved for, are also excluded. Replacement costs are solicited from ownership/property management, EMG’s discussions with service companies, manufacturers' representatives, and previous experience in preparing such schedules for other similar facilities. Costs for work performed by the ownership’s or property management’s maintenance staff are also considered. EMG’s reserve methodology involves identification and quantification of those systems or components requiring capital reserve funds within the assessment period. The assessment period is defined as the effective age plus the reserve term. Additional information concerning system’s or component’s respective replacement costs (in today's dollars), typical expected useful lives, and remaining useful lives were estimated so that a funding schedule could be prepared. The Replacement Reserves Schedule presupposes that all required remedial work has been performed or that monies for remediation have been budgeted for items defined in the Immediate Repair Cost Estimate. PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 5 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2. Purpose and Scope 2.1. Purpose EMG was retained by the client to render an opinion as to the Property’s current general physical condition on the day of the site visit. Based on the observations, interviews and document review outlined below, this report identifies significant deferred maintenance issues, existing deficiencies, and material code violations of record at municipal offices, which affect the Property’s use. Opinions are rendered as to its structural integrity, building system condition and the Property’s overall condition. The report also notes building systems or components that have realized or exceeded their typical expected useful lives. CONDITIONS: The physical condition of building systems and related components are typically defined as being in one of five conditions: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Failed or a combination thereof. For the purposes of this report, the following definitions are used: Excellent = New or very close to new; component or system typically has been installed within the past year, sound and performing its function. Eventual repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Good = Satisfactory as-is. Component or system is sound and performing its function, typically within the first third of its lifecycle. However, it may show minor signs of normal wear and tear. Repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Fair = Showing signs of wear and use but still satisfactory as-is, typically near the median of its estimated useful life. Component or system is performing adequately at this time but may exhibit some signs of wear, deferred maintenance, or evidence of previous repairs. Repair or replacement will be required due to the component or system’s condition and/or its estimated remaining useful life. Poor = Component or system is significantly aged, flawed, functioning intermittently or unreliably; displays obvious signs of deferred maintenance; shows evidence of previous repair or workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards; has become obsolete; or exhibits an inherent deficiency. The present condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of contiguous elements or systems. Either full component replacement is needed or repairs are required to restore to good condition, prevent premature failure, and/or prolong useful life. Failed = Component or system has ceased functioning or performing as intended. Replacement, repair, or other significant corrective action is recommended or required. Not Applicable = Assigning a condition does not apply or make logical sense, most commonly due to the item in question not being present. FORMAT OF THE BODY OF THE REPORT: Throughout sections 5 through 9 of this report, each report section will typically contain three subsections organized in the following sequence:  A descriptive table (and/or narrative), which identifies the components assessed, their condition, and other key data points.  A simple bulleted list of Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements, which lists components and assets typically in Excellent, Good, or Fair condition at the time of the assessment but that will require replacement or some other attention once aged past their estimated useful life. These listed components are typically included in the associated inventory database with costs identified and budgeted beyond the first several years.  A bulleted cluster of Actions/Comments, which include more detailed narratives describing deficiencies, recommended repairs, and short term replacements. The assets and components associated with these bullets are/were typically problematic and in Poor or Failed condition at the time of the assessment, with corresponding costs included within the first few years. PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 6 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PLAN TYPES: Each line item in the cost database is assigned a Plan Type, which is the primary reason or rationale for the recommended replacement, repair, or other corrective action. This is the “why” part of the equation. A cost or line item may commonly have more than one applicable Plan Type; however, only one Plan Type will be assigned based on the “best” fit, typically the one with the greatest significance. The following Plan Types are listed in general weighted order of importance: Safety = An observed or reported unsafe condition that if left unaddressed could result in an injury; a system or component that presents a potential liability risk. Performance/Integrity = Component or system has failed, is almost failing, performs unreliably, does not perform as intended, and/or poses a risk to overall system stability. Accessibility = Does not meet ADA, UFAS, and/or other handicap accessibility requirements. Environmental = Improvements to air or water quality, including removal of hazardous materials from the building or site. Modernization/Adaptation = Conditions, systems, or spaces that need to be upgraded in appearance or function to meet current standards, facility usage, or client/occupant needs. Lifecycle/Renewal = Any component or system in which future repair or replacement is anticipated beyond the next several years and/or is of minimal substantial early-term consequence. 2.2. Scope The standard scope of the Facility Condition Assessment includes the following:  Visit the Property to evaluate the general condition of the building and site improvements, review available construction documents in order to familiarize ourselves with, and be able to comment on, the in-place construction systems, life safety, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and the general built environment.  Identify those components that are exhibiting deferred maintenance issues and provide cost estimates for Immediate Costs and Replacement Reserves based on observed conditions, maintenance history and industry standard useful life estimates. This will include the review of documented capital improvements completed within the last five-year period and work currently contracted for, if applicable.  Provide a full description of the Property with descriptions of in-place systems and commentary on observed conditions.  Provide a general statement of the subject Property’s compliance to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This will not constitute a full ADA survey, but will help identify exposure to issues and the need for further review.  Perform a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) for the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. EMG will also interview Project personnel regarding the presence of any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Potentially affected areas will be photographed. Sampling will not be considered in routine assessments.  List the current utility service providers.  Review maintenance records and procedures with the in-place maintenance personnel.  Observe a representative sample of the interior spaces/units, including vacant spaces/units, in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas to be observed include the exterior of the property, the roofs, interior common areas, and the significant mechanical, electrical and elevator equipment rooms.  Provide recommendations for additional studies, if required, with related budgetary information.  Provide an Executive Summary at the beginning of this report. 2.3. Personnel Interviewed The management were interviewed for specific information relating to the physical property, available maintenance procedures, historical performance of key building systems and components, available drawings and other documentation. The following personnel from the facility and government agencies were interviewed in the process of conducting the FCA: Name and Title Organization Phone Number Tony Hule City of Yorkville (630) 885-3569 PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 7 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 The FCA was performed with the assistance of Tony Hule, City of Yorkville, the onsite Point of Contact (POC), who was cooperative and provided information that appeared to be accurate based upon subsequent site observations. The onsite contact is completely knowledgeable about the subject property and answered most questions posed during the interview process. The POC’s management involvement at the property has been for the past 14 years. 2.4. Documentation Reviewed Prior to the FCA, relevant documentation was requested that could aid in the knowledge of the subject property’s physical improvements, extent and type of use, and/or assist in identifying material discrepancies between reported information and observed conditions. The review of submitted documents does not include comment on the accuracy of such documents or their preparation, methodology, or protocol. The Documentation Request Form is provided in Appendix E. Although Appendix E provides a summary of the documents requested or obtained, the following list provides more specific details about some of the documents that were reviewed or obtained during the site visit.  No documents available. 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire A Pre-Survey Questionnaire was sent to the POC prior to the site visit, and was not returned. The questionnaire is included in Appendix E. 2.6. Weather Conditions June 26, 2017: Clear, with temperatures in the 70s (°F) and light winds. PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 8 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 3. Accessibility and Property Research 3.1. ADA Accessibility Generally, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by entities to access and use of “areas of public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” on the basis of disability. Regardless of its age, these areas and facilities must be maintained and operated to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). Buildings completed and occupied after January 26, 1992 are required to comply fully with the ADAAG. Existing facilities constructed prior to this date are held to the lesser standard of compliance to the extent allowed by structural feasibility and the financial resources available. As an alternative, a reasonable accommodation pertaining to the deficiency must be made. During the FCA, a limited visual observation for ADA accessibility compliance was conducted. The scope of the visual observation was limited to those areas set forth in EMG’s Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist provided in Appendix D of this report. It is understood by the Client that the limited observations described herein does not comprise a full ADA Compliance Survey, and that such a survey is beyond the scope of EMG’s undertaking. Only a representative sample of areas was observed and, other than as shown on the Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist, actual measurements were not taken to verify compliance. At a Garage/Office property, the areas considered as a public accommodation besides the site itself and parking, are the exterior accessible route, the interior accessible route up to the tenant lease lines and the interior common areas, including the common area restrooms. The facility does not appear to be accessible with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Elements as defined by the ADAAG that are not accessible as stated within the priorities of Title III, are as follows: Parking  Adequate number of designated parking stalls and signage for vans are not provided. Ramps  Existing exterior ramps and stairs are not equipped with the required handrails (each side). Restrooms  Install grab bars in accessible stalls at 36” above the floor. A full ADA Compliance Survey may reveal some aspects of the property that are not in compliance. Corrections of these conditions should be addressed from a liability standpoint, but are not necessarily code violations. The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines concern civil rights issues as they pertain to the disabled and are not a construction code, although many local jurisdictions have adopted the Guidelines as such. The cost to address the achievable items noted above is included in the cost tables. 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone Not applicable PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 9 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 4. Existing Building Assessment 4.1. Unit or Space Types All 10,600 square feet of the building are occupied by a single occupant, City of Yorkville. The spaces are mostly a combination of offices, supporting restrooms, garages. 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed The interior spaces were observed in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas accessed included the site within the property boundaries, exterior of the property and the roof. All areas of the property were available for observation during the site visit. PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 10 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 5. Site Improvements 5.1. Utilities The following table identifies the utility suppliers and the condition and adequacy of the services. Site Utilities Utility Supplier Condition and Adequacy Sanitary sewer City of Yorkville Good Storm sewer Yorkville Department of Public Works Good Domestic water City of Yorkville Good Electric service ComEd Good Natural gas service Nicor Good Actions/Comments:  According to the POC, the utilities provided are adequate for the property. There are no unique, onsite utility systems such as emergency electrical generators, septic systems, water or waste water treatment plants, or propane gas tanks. 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks Item Description Main Ingress and Egress Wolf Street Access from North Additional Entrances N/A Additional Access from N/A Paving and Flatwork Item Material Last Work Done Condition Entrance Driveway Apron Asphalt 2008 Fair Parking Lot Asphalt 2008 Fair Drive Aisles None -- -- Service Aisles None -- -- Sidewalks Concrete 2008 Good Curbs Concrete 2008 Fair Site Stairs None -- -- Pedestrian Ramps None -- -- PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 11 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Parking Count Open Lot Carport Private Garage Subterranean Garage Freestanding Parking Structure 23 -- -- -- - Total Number of ADA Compliant Spaces 1 Number of ADA Compliant Spaces for Vans 0 Total Parking Spaces 23 Parking Ratio (Spaces/Apartments) -- Method of Obtaining Parking Count Physical count Exterior Stairs Location Material Handrails Condition None -- -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Asphalt seal coating  Asphalt pavement Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control Drainage System and Erosion Control System Exists At Site Condition Surface Flow ☒ Good Inlets ☐ -- Swales ☐ -- Detention pond ☐ -- Lagoons ☐ -- Ponds ☐ -- Underground Piping ☐ -- Pits ☐ -- Municipal System ☐ -- Dry Well ☐ -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 12 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  There is no evidence of storm water runoff from adjacent properties. The storm water system appears to provide adequate runoff capacity. There is no evidence of major ponding or erosion. 5.4. Topography and Landscaping Item Description Site Topography Generally flat. Landscaping Trees Grass Flower Beds Planters Drought Tolerant Plants Decorative Stone None ☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Landscaping Condition Good Irrigation Automatic Underground Drip Hand Watering None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Irrigation Condition -- Retaining Walls Type Location Condition None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The topography and adjacent uses do not appear to present conditions detrimental to the property. There are no significant areas of erosion. 5.5. General Site Improvements Property Signage Property Signage Post mounted wood Street Address Displayed? Yes Site and Building Lighting Site Lighting None Pole Mounted Bollard Lights Ground Mounted Parking Lot Pole Type ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Choose an item. PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 13 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Site and Building Lighting Building Lighting None Wall Mounted Recessed Soffit ☐ ☒ ☐ Fair Site Fencing Type Location Condition None -- -- REFUSE DISPOSAL Refuse Disposal Common area dumpsters Dumpster Locations Mounting Enclosure Contracted? Condition South part of Front Elevation Asphalt paving None No Fair Other Site Amenities Description Location Condition Playground Equipment None -- -- Tennis Courts None -- -- Basketball Court None -- -- Swimming Pool None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Exterior lighting Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 14 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems 6.1. Foundations Building Foundation Item Description Condition Foundation Slab on grade with integral footings Good Basement and Crawl Space None -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  There are no significant signs of settlement, deflection, or movement. 6.2. Superstructure Building Superstructure Item Description Condition Framing / Load-Bearing Walls Steel columns and beams Good Ground Floor Concrete slab Good Upper Floor Framing Wood joists Good Upper Floor Decking Plywood or OSB Fair Roof Framing Steel beams or girders Good Roof Decking Metal decking Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The superstructure is exposed in some locations, which allows for limited observation. Walls and floors appear to be plumb, level, and stable. There are no significant signs of deflection or movement. 6.3. Roofing Primary Roof Type / Geometry Gable Roof Finish Metal Maintenance Outside Contractor Roof Age 9 Yrs PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 15 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Primary Roof Flashing Sheet Metal Warranties None Parapet Copings None Roof Drains Gutters and downspouts Fascia Metal Panel Insulation Fiberglass batts Soffits None Skylights No Attics Steel beams Ponding No Ventilation Source-1 Ridge Vents Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 -- Roof Condition Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The roof finishes are original. Information regarding roof warranties or bonds was not available. The roofs are maintained by an outside contractor.  There is no evidence of active roof leaks.  There is no evidence of roof deck or insulation deterioration. The roof substrate and insulation should be inspected during any future roof repair or replacement work.  Roof drainage appears to be adequate. Clearing and minor repair of drain system components should be performed regularly as part of the property management’s routine maintenance and operations program.  The attics are not accessible and it could not be determined if there is moisture, water intrusion, or excessive daylight in the attics. 6.4. Exterior Walls Building Exterior Walls Type Location Condition Primary Finish Metal siding Good Secondary Finish Painted CMU Good Accented with -- -- Soffits Not Applicable -- Building sealants (caulking) are located between dissimilar materials, at joints, and around window and door openings. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 16 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  The metal siding has isolated areas of damaged siding along the top side of Garage No. 5. The damaged siding must be repaired. The cost for this work is relatively insignificant and the work can be performed as part of the property managements’ routine maintenance program. 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs Building Exterior and Interior Stairs Type Description Riser Handrail Balusters Condition Building Exterior Stairs None -- -- -- -- Building Interior Stairs Wood-framed Closed Wood Wood Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors Building Windows Window Framing Glazing Location Window Screen Condition Aluminum framed, operable Double glaze Front Elevation of Building ☐ Good Building Doors Main Entrance Doors Door Type Condition Metal, insulated Fair Secondary Entrance Doors Metal, insulated Fair Service Doors Metal, hollow Fair Overhead Doors Aluminium Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Exterior Metal doors Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 17 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony Not applicable. There are no patios, terraces, or balconies. PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 18 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems See the Mechanical Equipment List in the Appendices for the quantity, manufacturer’s name, model number, capacity and year of manufacturer of the major mechanical equipment, if available. 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Individual Units Primary Components Split system furnaces and condensing units Cooling (if separate from above) performed via components above Quantity and Capacity Ranges 1 unit ranging from 5 tons/BTUH Total Heating or Cooling Capacity 5 tons/BTUH Heating Fuel Electric Location of Equipment Interior Garage Space Served by System Entire building Age Ranges All units dated 2014 Primary Component Condition Good Supplemental Components Supplemental Component #1 Suspended unit heaters Location / Space Served by Suspended Unit Heaters Above Office in Garage Suspended Unit Heater Condition Good Supplemental Component #2 Ceiling Fans Location / Space Served by Ceiling Fans Throughout Building Ceiling Fans Condition Fair Supplemental Component #3 Engine Exhaust Removal Location / Space Served by Engine Exhaust Removal Ceiling of Garage Engine Exhaust Removal Condition Good Controls and Ventilation HVAC Control System Individual programmable thermostats/controls HVAC Control System Condition Good Building Ventilation Engine Exhaust Removal Ventilation System Condition Good PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 19 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Engine Exhaust Removal Fans  Suspended Unit Heaters  Electric Furnace  Ceiling Fans  Condensing Unit Actions/Comments:  The HVAC systems are maintained by an outside contractor. Records of the installation, maintenance, upgrades, and replacement of the HVAC equipment at the property have been maintained since the property was first occupied.  The HVAC equipment appears to vary in age. The property is relatively new and has not required any major HVAC equipment replacements.  The HVAC equipment appears to be functioning adequately overall. No chronic problems were reported and an overall sense of satisfaction with the systems was conveyed. However, due to the inevitable failure of parts and components over time, some of the equipment will require replacement. 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water Building Plumbing System Type Description Condition Water Supply Piping Copper Fair Waste/Sewer Piping Cast iron Fair Vent Piping Cast iron Fair Water Meter Location Right Elevation of Building Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Components Water Heaters Fuel Electric Quantity and Input Capacity 1 unit Storage Capacity 50 gallons Boiler or Water Heater Condition Fair Supplementary Storage Tanks? No Storage Tank Quantity & Volume -- Quantity of Storage Tanks -- Storage Tank Condition -- Domestic Hot Water Circulation Pumps (3 HP and over) No Adequacy of Hot Water Adequate Adequacy of Water Pressure Adequate Plumbing Fixtures Water Closets Residential grade PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 20 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Plumbing Fixtures Toilet (Water Closet) Flush Rating 1.6 GPF Common Area Faucet Nominal Flow Rate 2.0 GPM Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Water Heater  Backflow Preventer  Water Closets  Sinks  Lavatory  Bathroom Vanity Actions/Comments:  The plumbing systems appear to be well maintained and functioning adequately. The water pressure appears to be sufficient. No significant repair actions or short-term replacement costs are required. Routine and periodic maintenance is recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components or systems listed above will be required. 7.3. Building Gas Distribution Not applicable. The property is not supplied with natural gas. 7.4. Building Electrical Building Electrical Systems Electrical Lines Underground Transformer Pad-mounted Main Service Size 800 Amps Volts 120/240 Volt, single-phase Meter & Panel Location North Elevation of Building Branch Wiring Copper Conduit Metallic Step-Down Transformers? No Security / Surveillance System? No Building Intercom System? No Lighting Fixtures T-12 Main Distribution Condition Good Secondary Panel and Transformer Condition Good Lighting Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Distribution Panels  Interior Lighting System PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 21 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  The onsite electrical systems up to the meters are owned and maintained by the respective utility company.  The electrical service and capacity appear to be adequate for the property’s demands.  The panels are mostly original 2008 components. The electrical service is reportedly adequate for the facility’s needs. However, due to the age of the panels and increasing difficulty of obtaining replacement parts over time, lifecycle replacements are recommended per above. 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems Not applicable. There are no elevators or conveying systems. 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems Item Description Type None Fire Alarm System Central Alarm Panel ☐ Battery-Operated Smoke Detectors ☒ Alarm Horns ☐ Annunciator Panels ☐ Hard-Wired Smoke Detectors ☐ Strobe Light Alarms ☐ Pull Stations ☐ Emergency Battery-Pack Lighting ☒ Illuminated EXIT Signs ☒ Alarm System Condition -- Sprinkler System None ☐ Standpipes ☐ Backflow Preventer ☒ Hose Cabinets ☐ Fire Pumps ☐ Siamese Connections ☐ Suppression Condition -- Central Alarm Panel System Location of Alarm Panel Installation Date of Alarm Panel -- -- Fire Extinguishers Last Service Date Servicing Current? 2016 No Hydrant Location None Siamese Location -- Special Systems Kitchen Suppression System ☐ Computer Room Suppression System ☐ Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments: PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 22 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660  The vast majority of the building is not protected by fire suppression. Due to its construction date, the facility is most likely “grandfathered” by code and the installation of fire sprinklers not required until major renovations are performed. Regardless of when or if installation of facility-wide fire suppression is required by the governing municipality, EMG recommends a retrofit be performed. As part of the major recommended short-term renovations, a facility-wide fire suppression retrofit is recommended. A budgetary cost is included.  The fire alarm systems appear somewhat antiquated and not up to current standards. Due to the age of the components and apparent shortcomings, a full modernization project is recommended. As part of the major recommended short-term renovations, a facility-wide fire alarm modernization is recommended. A budgetary cost is included. 7.7. Life Support Systems Not Applicable PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 23 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 8. I nterior Spaces 8.1. I nterior Finishes The facility is used as an Office Building and Garage for the City of Yorkville. The most significant interior spaces include offices, and garage. Supporting areas include hallways, stairs, administrative offices, restrooms, employee break rooms and garages. The following table generally describes the locations and typical conditions of the interior finishes within the facility: Typical Floor Finishes Floor Finish Locations General Condition Concrete Offices, Garage, Restrooms Good Typical Wall Finishes Wall Finish Locations General Condition Painted drywall Office and Restroom Fair Steel Garage Good Typical Ceiling Finishes Ceiling Finish Locations General Condition Painted drywall Office and Restroom Fair Metal Garage Good Interior Doors Item Type Condition Interior Doors Hollow core Wood Fair Door Framing Wood Fair Fire Doors No -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Wood Hollow-Core  Wood Hollow-Core Door w/Glass  Interior paint Actions/Comments:  It appears that the interior finishes are original.  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 24 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment Not applicable. There are no commercial kitchens or laundry onsite. The Office kitchen includes the following residential appliances, fixtures, and equipment: Commercial Kitchen Appliance Comment Condition Refrigerators Up-right Fair Freezers -- -- Ranges -- -- Ovens -- -- Griddles / Grills -- -- Fryers -- -- Hood -- -- Dishwasher -- -- Microwave ☒ Fair Ice Machines ☐ -- Steam Tables ☐ -- Work Tables ☐ -- Shelving ☐ -- Commercial Laundry Equipment Comment Condition Commercial Washing Machines ☐ -- Commercial Dryers ☐ -- Residential Washers ☒ Fair Residential Dryers ☒ Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Refrigerator  Kitchen Cabinet  Residential Washer/Dryer Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 25 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 9. Other Structures Not applicable. There are no major accessory structures. PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 26 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 10. Certification City of Yorkville retained EMG to perform this Facility Condition Assessment in connection with its continued operation of Public Works Garage (Frame Building), 185 Wolf Street, Yorkville, IL 60560, the “Property”. It is our understanding that the primary interest of ClientN is to locate and evaluate materials and building system defects that might significantly affect the value of the property and to determine if the present Property has conditions that will have a significant impact on its continued operations. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the brief review of the plans and records made available to our Project Manager during the site visit, interviews of available property management personnel and maintenance contractors familiar with the Property, appropriate inquiry of municipal authorities, our Project Manager’s walk-through observations during the site visit, and our experience with similar properties. No testing, exploratory probing, dismantling or operating of equipment or in-depth studies were performed unless specifically required under Section 2 of this report. This assessment did not include engineering calculations to determine the adequacy of the Property’s original design or existing systems. Although walk-through observations were performed, not all areas were observed (See Section 4.2 for areas observed). There may be defects in the Property, which were in areas not observed or readily accessible, may not have been visible, or were not disclosed by management personnel when questioned. The report describes property conditions at the time that the observations and research were conducted. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for the use of City of Yorkville for the purpose stated within Section 2 of this report. The report, or any excerpt thereof, shall not be used by any party other than City of Yorkville or for any other purpose than that specifically stated in our agreement or within Section 2 of this report without the express written consent of EMG. Any reuse or distribution of this report without such consent shall be at City of Yorkville and the recipient’s sole risk, without liability to EMG. Prepared by: Tammy Prusa Project Manager Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 27 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 11. Appendices Appendix A: Photographic Record Appendix B: Site Plan Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Appendix D: Pre-Survey Questionnaire PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix A: Photographic Record PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #1: FRONT ELEVATION #2: LEFT ELEVATION #3: REAR ELEVATION #4: RIGHT ELEVATION #5: SIDEWALK, CONCRETE #6: ASPHALT PAVEMENT PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #7: FOUNDATIONS, CONCRETE SLAB-ON-GRADE #8: ROOF, METAL #9: EXTERIOR WALL, ALUMINUM SIDING #10: INTERIOR STAIR/RAMP RAILS, WOOD #11: WINDOW, ALUMINUM DOUBLE- GLAZED #12: OVERHEAD DOOR, ALUMINUM ROLL-UP PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #13: EXTERIOR DOOR, STEEL W/ GLASS #14: EXTERIOR DOOR, STEEL #15: DAMAGE TO OVERHEAD DOOR NO. 5. #16: RESIDENTIAL FIXTURES, CEILING FAN #17: EXHAUST FAN, CENTRIFUGAL #18: UNIT HEATER, NATURAL GAS PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #19: FURNACE, ELECTRIC #20: CONDENSING UNIT/HEAT PUMP, SPLIT SYSTEM #21: UNIT HEATER, NATURAL GAS #22: WATER HEATER, ELECTRIC, RESIDENTIAL #23: BACKFLOW PREVENTER #24: LAVATORY, VITREOUS CHINA PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #25: TOILET, FLUSH TANK #26: SINK, PLASTIC #27: RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES, CLOTHES WASHER #28: SINK, STAINLESS STEEL #29: BATHROOM VANITY CABINET, WOOD, WITH CULTURED MARBLE SINK TOP #30: INCANDESCENT LIGHTING FIXTURE, BASIC PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #31: DISTRIBUTION PANEL #1 #32: DISTRIBUTION PANEL #2 #33: DISTRIBUTION PANEL #3 #34: LIGHTING SYSTEM, INTERIOR, OFFICE BUILDING #35: DISTRIBUTION PANEL #4 #36: DISTRIBUTION PANEL #5 PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #37: HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LIGHTING FIXTURE #38: EXIT LIGHTING FIXTURE, LED #39: FIRE EXTINGUISHER #40: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, GYPSUM BOARD/PLASTER/METAL #41: INTERIOR WINDOW #42: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, STEEL PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #43: INTERIOR DOOR, WOOD SOLID- CORE W/ GLASS #44: INTERIOR DOOR, WOOD HOLLOW-CORE #45: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, METAL #46: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, GYPSUM BOARD/PLASTER #47: KITCHEN CABINET, BASE AND WALL SECTION, WOOD #48: RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES, REFRIGERATOR PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #49: RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES, CLOTHES DRYER PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix B: Site Plan Site Plan Project Name: Public Works Garage (Frame Building) Project Number: 122700.17R000-041.322 Source: Google Earth On-Site Date: June 26, 2017 PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Page 1 of 4 Date Completed: June 26, 2017 Property Name: Public Works Garage (Frame Building) EMG Project Number: 122700.17R000-041.322 Building History Yes No Unk Comments 1 Has an ADA survey previously been completed for this property? X 2 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? X 3 Does a Transition Plan / Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? X 4 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints that have not been resolved? X 5 Is any litigation pending related to ADA issues? X Parking Yes No NA Comments 1 Are there sufficient accessible parking spaces with respect to the total number of reported spaces? X 2 Are there sufficient van-accessible parking spaces available? X 3 Are accessible spaces marked with the International Symbol of Accessibility? Are there signs reading “Van Accessible” at van spaces? X 4 Is there at least one accessible route provided within the boundary of the site from public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones, if provided, and public streets and sidewalks? X 5 Do curbs on the accessible route have depressed, ramped curb cuts at drives, paths, and drop-offs? X 6 If required does signage exist directing you to accessible parking and an accessible building entrance? X Ramps Yes No NA Comments 1* Do all ramps along accessible path of travel appear to meet slope requirements? ( 1:12 or less) X 2 Are ramps that appear longer than 6 ft complete with railings on both sides? X Page 2 of 4 Ramps (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 3 Does the width between railings appear at least 36 inches? X 4 Is there a level landing for approximately every 30 ft horizontal length of ramp, at the top and at the bottom of ramps and switchbacks? X Entrances/Exits Yes No NA Comments 1 Do all required accessible entrance doorways appear at least 32 inches wide and not a revolving door? X 2 If the main entrance is inaccessible, are there alternate accessible entrances? X 3 Is the door hardware easy to operate (lever/push type hardware, no twisting required and not higher than approximately 48 inches above the floor)? X Paths of Travel Yes No NA Comments 1 Are all paths of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair (appear at least 36 inches wide)? X 2 Are wheelchair-accessible facilities (toilet rooms, exits, etc.) identified with signage? X 3 Is there a path of travel that does not require the use of stairs? X Elevators Yes No NA Comments 1 Do the call buttons have visual and audible signals to indicate when a call is registered and answered when car arrives? X 2 Are there visual and audible signals inside cars indicating floor change? X 3 Are there standard raised and Braille marking on both jambs of each hoist way entrance as well as all cab/call buttons? X 4 Do elevator doors have a reopening device that will stop and reopen a car door if an object or a person obstructs the door? X 5 Are elevator controls low enough to be reached from a wheelchair (appears to be between 15 and 48 inches)? X 6 If a two-way emergency communication system is provided within the elevator cab, is it usable without voice communication? X Page 3 of 4 Toilet Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 Are common area public restrooms located on an accessible route? X 2 Are pull handles push/pull or lever type? X 3 Are there audible and visual fire alarm devices in the toilet rooms? X 4 Are toilet room access doors wheelchair- accessible (appear to be at least 32 inches wide)? X 5 Are public restrooms large enough to accommodate a wheelchair turnaround (appear to have 60” turning diameter)? X 6 In unisex toilet rooms, are there safety alarms with pull cords? X 7 Are toilet stall doors wheelchair accessible (appear to be at least 32” wide)? X 8 Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? X 9 Are sinks provided with clearance for a wheelchair to roll under (appear to have 29” clearance)? X 10 Are sink handles operable with one hand without grasping, pinching or twisting? X 11 Are exposed pipes under sink sufficiently insulated against contact? X Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 How many total accessible sleeping rooms does the property management report to have? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible sleeping rooms with respect to the total number of reported guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X Page 4 of 4 Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 2 How many of the accessible sleeping rooms per property management have roll- in showers? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible rooms with roll-in showers with respect to the total number of reported accessible guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X 3 How many assistive listening kits and/or rooms with communication features are available per property management? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported assistive listening devices with respect to the total number of rooms? See attached hot sheet. X Pools Yes No NA Comments 1 Are public access pools provided? If the answer is no, please disregard this section. X 2 How many accessible access points are provided to each pool/spa? Provide number in comment field. Is at least one fixed lift or sloped entry to the pool provided? X Play Area Yes No NA Comments 1 Has the play area been reviewed for accessibility? All public playgrounds are subject to ADAAG standards. X Exercise Equipment Yes No NA Comments 1 Does there appear to be adequate clear floor space around the machines/equipment (30” by 48” minimum)? X *Based on visual observation only. The slope was not confirmed through measurements. PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix D: Pre-Survey Questionnaire PP RR EE --SS UU RR VV EE YY QQ UU EE SS TT II OO NN NN AA II RR EE This questionnaire must be completed by the property owner, the owner's designated representative, or someone knowledgeable about the subject property. The completed form must be presented to EMG's Field Observer on the day of the site visit. If the form is not completed, EMG’s Project Manager will require additional time during the on-site visit with such a knowledgeable person in order to complete the questionnaire. During the site visit, EMG's Field Observer may ask for details associated with selected questions. This questionnaire will be utilized as an exhibit in EMG's final Physical Needs Assessment. Name of person completing questionnaire: Association with property: Length of association with property: Date Completed: Phone Number: Property Name: Property Address Year Built # of Buildings/Stories # of Units Acres Directions: Please answer all questions to the best of your knowledge and in good faith. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. INSPECTIONS DATE OF LAST REPAIR/REPLACEMENT LIST ANY OUTSTANDING REPAIRS REQUIRED 1 Elevators How many? Type of elevator traction or hydraulic How old is the current elevator(s)? 2 HVAC Describe the existing HVAC system (what type of system). How old is the current system? 3 Mechanical Systems Describe current mechanical systems Give ages of each component and type 4 Electrical system How old is the current electrical system? 5 Plumbing System Describe the existing plumbing system (what type of piping for domestic water distribution system, sewer main, storm water). How old are the current plumbing system components? 6 Life-Safety/Fire Systems What systems are currently in place? How old are they? INSPECTIONS DATE OF LAST REPAIR/REPLACEMENT LIST ANY OUTSTANDING REPAIRS REQUIRED 7 Roofs What type of roof is on the building(s), What type of decking? How old is it/are they? 8 Foundation, Structure What type of foundation? (slab on grade, piers, concrete foundation walls, footings) What type of structure (wood frame, concrete, steel) QUESTION RESPONSE 9 List any major capital improvement within the last three years. 10 List any major capital expenditures planned for the next year. 11 Are any building systems (HVAC, roof, interior/exterior finishes, paving, etc.) the responsibilities of the tenant to maintain and replace? Mark the column corresponding to the appropriate response. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. Note: NA indicates “Not Applicable”, Unk indicates “Unknown” QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENTS Y N NA Unk 12 Are there any unresolved building, fire, or zoning code issues? 13 Are there any "down" or unusable units? 14 Are there any problems with erosion, stormwater drainage or areas of paving that do not drain? 15 Is the property served by a private water well? If so, please give age of current well. 16 Is the property served by a private septic system or other waste treatment systems? If so, please give age. Mark the column corresponding to the appropriate response. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. Note: NA indicates “Not Applicable”, Unk indicates “Unknown” QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENTS Y N NA Unk 17 Are there any problems with foundations or structures? 18 Is there any water infiltration in basements or crawl spaces? 19 Are there any wall, or window leaks? 20 Are there any roof leaks? 21 Is the roofing covered by a warranty or bond? 22 Are there any poorly insulated areas? 23 Is Fire Retardant Treated (FRT) plywood used? 24 Is exterior insulation and finish system (EIFS) or a synthetic stucco finish used? 25 Are there any problems with the utilities, such as inadequate capacities? 26 Are there any problems with the landscape irrigation systems? 27 Has a termite/wood boring insect inspection been performed within the last year? 28 Do any of the HVAC systems use R-11, 12, or 22 refrigerants? 29 Has any part of the property ever contained visible suspect mold growth? 30 Is there a mold Operations and Maintenance Plan? 31 Have there been indoor air quality or mold related complaints from tenants? 32 Is polybutylene piping used? 33 Are there any plumbing leaks or water pressure problems? 34 Are there any leaks or pressure problems with natural gas service? Mark the column corresponding to the appropriate response. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. Note: NA indicates “Not Applicable”, Unk indicates “Unknown” QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENTS Y N NA Unk 35 Does any part of the electrical system use aluminum wiring? 36 Do Residential units have a less than 60-Amp service? 37 Do Commercial units have less than 200-Amp service? 38 Are there any recalled fire sprinkler heads (Star, GEM, Central, Omega)? 39 Is there any pending litigation concerning the property? 40 If built before 1978, has there been previous asbestos testing completed 41 Does the property have an Asbestos Operations & Maintenance Program in place? 42 If built before 1978, has there been previous comprehensive Lead- Based Paint testing completed? 43 If built before 1960, has there been a previous Lead Based Paint Risk Assessment completed? 44 Does the property have a Lead- Based Paint Operations & Maintenance Program in place? 45 Has the management previously completed an ADA review? 46 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? 47 Does a Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? 48 Has the Barrier Removal Plan been approved by an arms-length third party? 49 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints? 50 Does elevator equipment require upgrades to meet ADA standards? 51 Are there any problems with exterior lighting? Mark the column corresponding to the appropriate response. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. Note: NA indicates “Not Applicable”, Unk indicates “Unknown” QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENTS Y N NA Unk 52 Are there any other significant issues/hazards with the property? 53 Are there any unresolved construction defects at the property? Please provide EMG with any previous reports completed for the property, including equipment testing, structural assessments, mechanical assessments, plumbing assessments, sewer line scoping, roof scans, electrical testing, etc. PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE (FRAME BUILDING) EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-041.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 On the day of the site visit, provide EMG's Field Observer access to all of the available documents listed below. Provide copies if possible. INFORMATION REQUIRED 1. All available construction documents (blueprints) for the original construction of the building or for any tenant improvement work or other recent construction work. 2. A site plan, preferably 8 1/2" X 11", which depicts the arrangement of buildings, roads, parking stalls, and other site features. 3. For commercial properties, provide a tenant list which identifies the names of each tenant, vacant tenant units, the floor area of each tenant space, and the gross and net leasable area of the building(s). 4. For apartment properties, provide a summary of the apartment unit types and apartment unit type quantities, including the floor area of each apartment unit as measured in square feet. 5. For hotel or nursing home properties, provide a summary of the room types and room type quantities. 6. Copies of Certificates of Occupancy, building permits, fire or health department inspection reports, elevator inspection certificates, roof or HVAC warranties, or any other similar, relevant documents. 7. The names of the local utility companies which serve the property, including the water, sewer, electric, gas, and phone companies. 8. The company name, phone number, and contact person of all outside vendors who serve the property, such as mechanical contractors, roof contractors, fire sprinkler or fire extinguisher testing contractors, and elevator contractors. 9. A summary of recent (over the last 5 years) capital improvement work which describes the scope of the work and the estimated cost of the improvements. Executed contracts or proposals for improvements. Historical costs for repairs, improvements, and replacements. 10. Records of system & material ages (roof, MEP, paving, finishes, furnishings). 11. Any brochures or marketing information. 12. Appraisal, either current or previously prepared. 13. Current occupancy percentage and typical turnover rate records (for commercial and apartment properties). 14. Previous reports pertaining to the physical condition of property. 15. ADA survey and status of improvements implemented. 16. Current / pending litigation related to property condition. Your timely compliance with this request is greatly appreciated. Prepared for: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT River Front Park Pavilion 201 East Hydraulic Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560 PREPARED BY: EMG CONTACT: EMG Andrew Hupp 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Senior Engineering Consultant Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 800.733.0660 x6632 800.733.0660 arhupp@emgcorp.com www.EMGcorp.com EMG Project Number: Date of Report: On Site Date: 122700.17R000-014.366 June 30, 2017 May 22, 2017 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT EMG Corporate Headquarters 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100, Owings Mills, MD 21117 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 RIVER FRONT PARK PAVILION EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-014.366 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition ................................................................ 1 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................... 2 2 Appendices ........................................................................................................................................... 4 RIVER FRONT PARK PAVILION EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-014.366 1 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1 Executive Summary 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition The property information is summarized in the table below. More detailed descriptions may be found in the various sections of the report and in the Appendices. Property Information Address: 201 East Hydraulic Street, Yorkville, Kendall, IL 60560 Year Constructed/Renovated: 1999 Current Occupants: City of Yorkville – Parks and Recreation Management Point of Contact: City of Yorkville, Mr. Peter Ratos 630.553.8574 phone pratos@yorkville.il.us email Property Type: Park Pavilion Site Area: 0.05 acres Building Area: 2,400 SF Number of Buildings: 1 Number of Stories: 1 Parking Type and Number of Spaces: Parking included in separate report, Riverfront Park. Building Construction: Steel frame Roof Construction: Gabled roof with metal roof finish Exterior Finishes: Painted structure Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning: Not applicable Fire and Life/Safety: Hydrants Dates of Visit: May 22, 2017 On-Site Point of Contact (POC): Scott Sleezer Assessment and Report Prepared by: Paul Prusa Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 Systemic Condition Summary Site Good HVAC -- Structure Good Plumbing -- Roof Good Electrical -- Vertical Envelope -- Elevators -- Interiors -- Fire -- RIVER FRONT PARK PAVILION EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-014.366 2 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 The following bullet points highlight the most significant short term and modernization recommendations:  Repair loose and missing stones. Generally, the property appears to have been constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained since it was first occupied and is in good overall condition. According to property management personnel, the property has had an active capital improvement expenditure program over the past three years, primarily consisting of exterior painting. Supporting documentation was not provided in support of these claims but some of the work is evident. 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate the FCI, which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. Two FCI ratios are calculated and presented, the Current Year and Ten-Year. The Current Year FCI is the ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to the building’s Current Replacement Value. Similarly, the Ten-Year FCI is the ratio of anticipated Capital Reserve Needs over the next ten years to the Current Replacement Value. FCI Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value Good In new or well-maintained condition, with no visual evidence of wear, soiling or other deficiencies. 0% to 5% Fair Subjected to wear and soiling but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. > than 5% to 10% Poor Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. > than 10% to 60% Very Poor Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal is now necessary. > than 60% RIVER FRONT PARK PAVILION EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-014.366 3 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 The graphs above and tables below represent summary-level findings for the FCA. The deficiencies identified in this assessment can be combined with potential new construction requirements to develop an overall strategy that can serve as the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy. Key findings from the assessment include: Key Finding Metric Current Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (IR)/(CRV) 0.0% Good 10-Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (RR)/(CRV) 1.6% Good Current Replacement Value (CRV) 500 SF * 183.24 / SF = $91,620 Year 0 (Current Year) - Immediate Repairs (IR) $78 Years 1-10 – Replacement Reserves (RR) $1,478 Total Capital Needs $1,556 The major issues contributing to the Immediate Repair Costs and the Current Year FCI ratio are summarized below:  Repair loose and missing stones. Further detail on the specific costs that make up the Immediate Repair Costs can be found in the cost tables at the beginning of this report. RIVER FRONT PARK PAVILION EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-014.366 4 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2 Appendices Appendix A: Photographic Record Appendix B: Site Plan Appendix C: ADA Checklist RIVER FRONT PARK PAVILION EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-014.366 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix A: Photographic Record RIVER FRONT PARK PAVILION EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-014.366 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #1: FRONT ELEVATION #2: RIGHT ELEVATION #3: LEFT ELEVATION #4: REAR ELEVATION #5: PEDESTRIAN PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, CONCRETE #6: STRUCTURAL FRAME, STEEL COLUMNS & BEAMS RIVER FRONT PARK PAVILION EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-014.366 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #7: PAINTED SURFACES #8: PAINTED SURFACE, SURFACE CORROSION #9: ROOF, METAL #10: STAIRS, CLAY BRICK/MASONRY PAVERS #11: STAIR, MISSING BRICK #12: CLAY BRICK/MASONRY PAVERS, MISSING AND DISLODGED BRICKS RIVER FRONT PARK PAVILION EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-014.366 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix B: Site Plan Site Plan Project Name: River Front Park Pavilion Project Number: 122700.17R000-014.366 Source: Google Maps On-Site Date: May 22, 2017 RIVER FRONT PARK PAVILION EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-014.366 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix C: ADA Checklist Page 1 of 4 Date Completed: June 14, 2017 Property Name: River Front Park Pavilion EMG Project Number: 122700.17R000-014.366 Building History Yes No Unk Comments 1 Has an ADA survey previously been completed for this property? X 2 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? X 3 Does a Transition Plan / Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? X 4 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints that have not been resolved? X 5 Is any litigation pending related to ADA issues? X Parking Yes No NA Comments 1 Are there sufficient accessible parking spaces with respect to the total number of reported spaces? X 2 Are there sufficient van-accessible parking spaces available? X 3 Are accessible spaces marked with the International Symbol of Accessibility? Are there signs reading “Van Accessible” at van spaces? X 4 Is there at least one accessible route provided within the boundary of the site from public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones, if provided, and public streets and sidewalks? X 5 Do curbs on the accessible route have depressed, ramped curb cuts at drives, paths, and drop-offs? X 6 If required does signage exist directing you to accessible parking and an accessible building entrance? X Ramps Yes No NA Comments 1* Do all ramps along accessible path of travel appear to meet slope requirements? ( 1:12 or less) X 2 Are ramps that appear longer than 6 ft complete with railings on both sides? X Page 2 of 4 Ramps (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 3 Does the width between railings appear at least 36 inches? X 4 Is there a level landing for approximately every 30 ft horizontal length of ramp, at the top and at the bottom of ramps and switchbacks? X Entrances/Exits Yes No NA Comments 1 Do all required accessible entrance doorways appear at least 32 inches wide and not a revolving door? X 2 If the main entrance is inaccessible, are there alternate accessible entrances? X 3 Is the door hardware easy to operate (lever/push type hardware, no twisting required and not higher than approximately 48 inches above the floor)? X Paths of Travel Yes No NA Comments 1 Are all paths of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair (appear at least 36 inches wide)? X 2 Are wheelchair-accessible facilities (toilet rooms, exits, etc.) identified with signage? X 3 Is there a path of travel that does not require the use of stairs? X Elevators Yes No NA Comments 1 Do the call buttons have visual and audible signals to indicate when a call is registered and answered when car arrives? X 2 Are there visual and audible signals inside cars indicating floor change? X 3 Are there standard raised and Braille marking on both jambs of each hoist way entrance as well as all cab/call buttons? X 4 Do elevator doors have a reopening device that will stop and reopen a car door if an object or a person obstructs the door? X 5 Are elevator controls low enough to be reached from a wheelchair (appears to be between 15 and 48 inches)? X 6 If a two-way emergency communication system is provided within the elevator cab, is it usable without voice communication? X Page 3 of 4 Toilet Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 Are common area public restrooms located on an accessible route? X 2 Are pull handles push/pull or lever type? X 3 Are there audible and visual fire alarm devices in the toilet rooms? X 4 Are toilet room access doors wheelchair- accessible (appear to be at least 32 inches wide)? X 5 Are public restrooms large enough to accommodate a wheelchair turnaround (appear to have 60” turning diameter)? X 6 In unisex toilet rooms, are there safety alarms with pull cords? X 7 Are toilet stall doors wheelchair accessible (appear to be at least 32” wide)? X 8 Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? X 9 Are sinks provided with clearance for a wheelchair to roll under (appear to have 29” clearance)? X 10 Are sink handles operable with one hand without grasping, pinching or twisting? X 11 Are exposed pipes under sink sufficiently insulated against contact? X Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 How many total accessible sleeping rooms does the property management report to have? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible sleeping rooms with respect to the total number of reported guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X Page 4 of 4 Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 2 How many of the accessible sleeping rooms per property management have roll- in showers? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible rooms with roll-in showers with respect to the total number of reported accessible guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X 3 How many assistive listening kits and/or rooms with communication features are available per property management? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported assistive listening devices with respect to the total number of rooms? See attached hot sheet. X Pools Yes No NA Comments 1 Are public access pools provided? If the answer is no, please disregard this section. X 2 How many accessible access points are provided to each pool/spa? Provide number in comment field. Is at least one fixed lift or sloped entry to the pool provided? X Play Area Yes No NA Comments 1 Has the play area been reviewed for accessibility? All public playgrounds are subject to ADAAG standards. X Exercise Equipment Yes No NA Comments 1 Does there appear to be adequate clear floor space around the machines/equipment (30” by 48” minimum)? X *Based on visual observation only. The slope was not confirmed through measurements. Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number New Business #3 Tracking Number PW 2017-66 Capital Project Update Public Works Committee – October 17, 2017 None Status Update Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department The purpose of this memo is to update the Public Works Committee as to the status of the several projects. A brief summary on the status of the projects is provided below: Construction Projects 2017 RTBR  The project is substantially complete. Center Parkway and Countryside Parkway Resurfacing  The project is substantially complete. Kennedy Road Resurfacing  The project is substantially complete. Kennedy Shared Use Path – ITEP  The project is substantially complete. The major remaining work items are pavement striping and street light re-installation. West Washington Street Water Main Improvements  The project is substantially complete. 2017 Sanitary Sewer Lining  Work has not yet initiated. Work is anticipated to begin around November 1st. The contract completion date is November 30th. Planning/Design Projects Rt 71 Water main and Sanitary Sewer Relocation  Final plans will be submitted to IDOT and to IEPA for permitting within the next week or two. Pavillion Road Streambank Stabilization  Design engineering is underway. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: October 4, 2017 Subject: Capital Improvement Projects Update Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number New Business #4 Tracking Number PW 2017-67 Quarterly Bond/LOC Reduction Summary – 9/30/17 Public Works Committee – October 17, 2017 Informational Informational Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department 30-Sep-17 2017 Bond and Letter of Credit Reduction Report Date Development/Project Engineer Concurrence City Administrator Concurrence Mayor Concurrence Reduction Final Release Reduction Value Remaining Balance 1/10/2017 Hamman Water main X X X $3,774.09 $0.00 1/24/2017 Bristol Bay Unit 3 X X X $112,267.81 $172,371.00 2/28/2017 Caledonia X X X $416,010.52 $557,615.58 3/17/2017 Ashley Pointe X X X $58,781.25 $119,989.25 9/7/2017 Lot 19 - Yorkville Business Park X X X $5,371.20 $0.00 9/26/2017 Autumn Creek - Unit 2C X X X $458,854.83 $240,015.05 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #5 Tracking Number PW 2017-68 Meeting Schedule for 2018 Public Works Committee – October 17, 2017 Proposed meeting dates for 2018. Lisa Pickering Administration Name Department Summary Proposed 2018 meeting schedule for the Public Works Committee. Meeting Schedule for 2018 For 2018, if the Public Works Committee would like to continue meeting the third Tuesday of the month at 6:00 p.m., the tentative meeting dates would be as follows:  January 16, 2018  February 20, 2018  March 20, 2018  April 17, 2018  May 15, 2018  June 19, 2018  July 17, 2018  August 21, 2018  September 18, 2018  October 16, 2018  November 20, 2018  December 18, 2018 Recommendation Staff recommends review of the proposed meeting dates and time so that a meeting schedule can be finalized for 2018. Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: October 11, 2017 Subject: Public Works Committee Meeting Schedule for 2018 Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa 123456 123 123 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5678910 4 5678910 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa 1 234567 12345 1 2 8 9 1011121314 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 456789 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa 1 234567 12341 8 9 1011121314 5 67891011 2 345678 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa Su M Tu W Th F Sa 123456 1231 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5678910 2 345678 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 September October November December January February March April May June July August 2018 Printable Yearly Calendar © 2013 Vertex42.com. Free to Print. http://www.vertex42.com/calendars/printable-calendars.html Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number New Business #6 Tracking Number PW 2017-69 2018 Road to Better Roads Program – Engineering Agreement Public Works Committee – October 17, 2017 N/A Majority Approval See attached. Bart Olson Adiministration Name Department 2018 Road Program United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, IL Professional Services Agreement - Design and Construction Engineering THIS AGREEMENT, by and between the United City of Yorkville, hereinafter referred to as the "City" or “OWNER” and Engineering Enterprises, Inc. hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor" or “ENGINEER” agrees as follows: A. Services: ENGINEER agrees to furnish to the City the following services: The ENGINEER shall provide any and all necessary engineering services to the City as indicated on the included Attachment A. Design engineering for all roadways indicated on Attachment D will be provided; additionally construction engineering will be provided for all roadways on Attachment D that can be included without exceeding the approved 2018 Roadway Program budget. All Engineering will be in accordance with all City and Illinois Department of Transportation requirements. B. Term: Services will be provided beginning on the date of execution of this agreement and continuing, until terminated by either party upon 7 days written notice to the non- terminating party or upon completion of the Services. Upon termination the ENGINEER shall be compensated for all work performed for the City prior to termination. C. Compensation and maximum amounts due to ENGINEER: ENGINEER shall receive as compensation for all work and services to be performed herein, an amount based on the Estimate of Level of Effort and Associated Cost included in Attachment B. Design Engineering will be paid for as a Lump Sum in the amount of $27,264.00 and Construction Engineering will be paid for hourly at the actual rates for services to be performed, currently estimated at $39,832.00. The hourly rates for this project are shown in the attached 2017 Standard Schedule of Charges. All payments will be made according to the Illinois State Prompt Payment Act and not less than once every thirty days. For outside services provided by other firms or subconsultants, the City shall pay the ENGINEER the invoiced fee to the ENGINEER, plus 10%. Such outside services include, but are not limited to services to be provided by Huff and Huff, Inc. and Rubino Engineering, Inc. D. Changes in Rates of Compensation: In the event that this contract is designated in Section B hereof as an Ongoing Contract, ENGINEER, on or before February 1st of any given year, shall provide written notice of 2018 Road Program United City of Yorkville Professional Services Agreement Design and Construction Engineering any change in the rates specified in Section C hereof (or on any attachments hereto) and said changes shall only be effective on and after May 1st of that same year. E. Ownership of Records and Documents: ENGINEER agrees that all books and records and other recorded information developed specifically in connection with this agreement shall remain the property of the City. ENGINEER agrees to keep such information confidential and not to disclose or disseminate the information to third parties without the consent of the City. This confidentiality shall not apply to material or information, which would otherwise be subject to public disclosure through the freedom of information act or if already previously disclosed by a third party. Upon termination of this agreement, ENGINEER agrees to return all such materials to the City. The City agrees not to modify any original documents produced by ENGINEER without contractors consent. Modifications of any signed duplicate original document not authorized by ENGINEER will be at OWNER’s sole risk and without legal liability to the ENGINEER. Use of any incomplete, unsigned document will, likewise, be at the OWNER’s sole risk and without legal liability to the ENGINEER. F. Governing Law: This contract shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois. Venue shall be in Kendall County, Illinois. G. Independent Contractor: ENGINEER shall have sole control over the manner and means of providing the work and services performed under this agreement. The City’s relationship to the ENGINEER under this agreement shall be that of an independent contractor. ENGINEER will not be considered an employee to the City for any purpose. H. Certifications: Employment Status : The Contractor certifies that if any of its personnel are an employee of the State of Illinois, they have permission from their employer to perform the service. Anti-Bribery : The Contractor certifies it is not barred under 30 Illinois Compiled Statutes 500/50-5(a) - (d) from contracting as a result of a conviction for or admission of bribery or attempted bribery of an officer or employee of the State of Illinois or any other state. Loan Default: If the Contractor is an individual, the Contractor certifies that he/she is not in default for a period of six months or more in an amount of $600 or more on the repayment of any educational loan guaranteed by the Illinois State Scholarship 2018 Road Program United City of Yorkville Professional Services Agreement Design and Construction Engineering Commission made by an Illinois institution of higher education or any other loan made from public funds for the purpose of financing higher education (5 ILCS 385/3). Felony Certification: The Contractor certifies that it is not barred pursuant to 30 Illinois Compiled Statutes 500/50-10 from conducting business with the State of Illinois or any agency as a result of being convicted of a felony. Barred from Contracting : The Contractor certifies that it has not been barred from contracting as a result of a conviction for bid-rigging or bid rotating under 720 Illinois Compiled Statutes 5/33E or similar law of another state. Drug Free Workplace: The Contractor certifies that it is in compliance with the Drug Free Workplace Act (30 Illinois Compiled Statutes 580) as of the effective date of this contract. The Drug Free Workplace Act requires, in part, that Contractors, with 25 or more employees certify and agree to take steps to ensure a drug free workplace by informing employees of the dangers of drug abuse, of the availability of any treatment or assistance program, of prohibited activities and of sanctions that will be imposed for violations; and that individuals with contracts certify that they will not engage in the manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance in the performance of the contract. Non-Discrimination, Certification, and Equal Employment Opportunity : The Contractor agrees to comply with applicable provisions of the Illinois Human Rights Act (775 Illinois Compiled Statutes 5), the U.S. Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 504 of the U.S. Rehabilitation Act and the rules applicable to each. The equal opportunity clause of Section 750.10 of the Illinois Department of Human Rights Rules is specifically incorporated herein. The Contractor shall comply with Executive Order 11246, entitled Equal Employment Opportunity, as amended by Executive Order 11375, and as supplemented by U.S. Department of Labor regulations (41 C.F.R. Chapter 60). The Contractor agrees to incorporate this clause into all subcontracts under this Contract. International Boycott: The Contractor certifies that neither it nor any substantially owned affiliated company is participating or shall participate in an international boycott in violation of the provisions of the U.S. Export Administration Act of 1979 or the regulations of the U.S. Department of Commerce promulgated under that Act (30 ILCS 582). Record Retention and Audits: If 30 Illinois Compiled Statutes 500/20-65 requires the Contractor (and any subcontractors) to maintain, for a period of 3 years after the later of the date of completion of this Contract or the date of final payment under the Contract, all books and records relating to the performance of the Contract and necessary to support amounts charged to the City under the Contract. The Contract and all books and records related to the Contract shall be available for review and audit by the City and the Illinois Auditor General. If this Contract is funded from contract/grant funds provided by the 2018 Road Program United City of Yorkville Professional Services Agreement Design and Construction Engineering U.S. Government, the Contract, books, and records shall be available for review and audit by the Comptroller General of the U.S. and/or the Inspector General of the federal sponsoring agency. The Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with any audit and to provide full access to all relevant materials. United States Resident Certification: (This certification must be included in all contracts involving personal services by non-resident aliens and foreign entities in accordance with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Services for withholding and reporting federal income taxes.) The Contractor certifies that he/she is a: x United States Citizen ___ Resident Alien ___ Non-Resident Alien The Internal Revenue Service requires that taxes be withheld on payments made to non resident aliens for the performance of personal services at the rate of 30%. Tax Payer Certification : Under penalties of perjury, the Contractor certifies that its Federal Tax Payer Identification Number or Social Security Number is (provided separately) and is doing business as a (check one): ___ Individual ___ Real Estate Agent ___ Sole Proprietorship ___ Government Entity ___ Partnership ___ Tax Exempt Organization (IRC 501(a) only) x Corporation ___ Not for Profit Corporation ___ Trust or Estate ___ Medical and Health Care Services Provider Corp. I. Indemnification: ENGINEER shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and City’s agents, servants, and employees against all loss, damage, and expense which it may sustain or for which it will become liable on account of injury to or death of persons, or on account of damage to or destruction of property resulting from the performance of work under this agreement by ENGINEER or its Subcontractors, or due to or arising in any manner from the wrongful act or negligence of ENGINEER or its Subcontractors of any employee of any of them. In the event that the either party shall bring any suit, cause of action or counterclaim against the other party, the non-prevailing party shall pay to the prevailing party the cost and expenses incurred to answer and/or defend such action, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs. In no event shall the either party indemnify any other party for the consequences of that party’s negligence, including failure to follow the ENGINEER’s recommendations. J. Insurance: The ENGINEER agrees that it has either attached a copy of all required insurance certificates or that said insurance is not required due to the nature and extent of the types of services rendered hereunder. (Not applicable as having been previously supplied) K. Additional Terms or Modification: The terms of this agreement shall be further modified as provided on the attachments. Except for those terms included on the attachments, no additional terms are included as a 2018 Road Program United City of Yorkville Professional Services Agreement Design and Construction Engineering part of this agreement. All prior understandings and agreements between the parties are merged into this agreement, and this agreement may not be modified orally or in any manner other than by an agreement in writing signed by both parties. In the event that any provisions of this agreement shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall be valid and binding on the parties. The list of attachments are as follows: Attachment A: Scope of Services Attachment B: Estimated Level of Effort and Associated Cost Attachment C: Anticipated Project Schedule Attachment D: Location Map Attachment E: 2017 Standard Schedule of Charges L. Notices: All notices required to be given under the terms of this agreement shall be given mail, addressed to the parties as follows: For the City: For the ENGINEER: City Administrator and City Clerk Engineering Enterprises, Inc. United City of Yorkville 52 Wheeler Road 800 Game Farm Road Sugar Grove Illinois 60554 Yorkville, IL 60560 Either of the parties may designate in writing from time to time substitute addresses or persons in connection with required notices. Agreed to this _____day of __________________, 2017. United City of Yorkville: Engineering Enterprises, Inc.: _________________________________ ________________________________ Gary Golinski Brad Sanderson, P.E. Mayor Vice President _________________________________ ________________________________ Beth Warren Angie Smith City Clerk Executive Assistant 2018 RTBR Program United City of Yorkville Kendall County, IL Professional Services Agreement - Design and Construction Engineering Attachment A – Scope of Services Design Engineering:  Process required documents with the Illinois Department of Transportation for Motor Fuel Tax Projects including: o BLR14230 - Resolution o BLR14231 - Municipal Estimate of Maintenance Costs o BLR11510 - Preliminary Estimate of Cost  Conduct site visit(s) to assess condition of existing pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage, structures and identify non-compliant sidewalk curb ramps.  Obtain, review and inventory existing utility, roadway, right-of-way, ownership, soil data, etc.  Obtain utility information to identify potential conflicts, as necessary.  Obtain geotechnical site data, consisting of pavement cores taken every 300-500 feet, as necessary.  Coordinate documentation for CCDD Management of soils, as necessary.  Coordinate and develop with City Staff the final scope of improvements  Confirm pavement design and rehabilitation methodology.  Prepare MFT General Maintenance Section bid package, and ancillary documents, including: o BLR12200 – Local Public Agency Formal Contract Proposal o BLR12200 A – Schedule of Prices o BLR12230 - Bid Bond Form o BLR12325 - Apprenticeship Certification o BC57 - Affidavit of Availability o BLR11310 – Special Provisions o BLR12326 – Affidavit of Illinois Business Office o Index for Supplemental Specifications and Recurring Special Provisions o Check Sheet for Recurring Special Provisions o Special Provisions o Bureau of Design and Environment Special Provisions/Check sheets o Local Roads Special Provisions o District Special Provisions o Location Map o City Provisions & Details o Existing/Proposed Typical Sections o Highway Standards o Prevailing Wage o BLR14232 – Municipal Maintenance Operations  Spring Street (IL Route 47 to McHugh Road)  Teri Lane (Spring Street to Cul Du Sac)  Walsh Drive (North of East / West Barberry to Dead End)  Pavillion Road (IL Route 71 to City Limit)  Coordinate IDOT and City review, including revisions and approval  Prepare preliminary and final cost estimates 2018 RTBR Program United City of Yorkville Professional Services Agreement Design and Construction Engineering Attachment A - Scope of Services  Assist in bidding, contractor/bid evaluations, contract preparation and additional contract administration as required; facilitate IDOT approval of Contract  Attend public meetings with Staff to review design progress  Provide all bid packages in 8 ½” x 11½” format  Provide planning/design/construction schedule and frequent updates regarding any potential items affecting the schedule Construction Engineering:  Attend the Pre-Construction Conference with the Contractor  Provide resident engineering for on-site observation  Daily documentation of work tasks and calculation of installed pay items  Monitor adherence to specifications  Gather material inspection and coordinate any required testing on behalf of the City  Provide guidance to the contractor when questions arise during construction  Prepare/verify payment estimates  Gather certified payrolls and waivers of lien  Provide information to residents as required  Perform punch list inspections, provide follow up inspections and recommend acceptance when appropriate  Communicate activities with City weekly, or as required based on onsite activities  Prepare necessary IDOT closeout paperwork o BLR13231 – Engineer’s Final Payment Estimate o BLR13210 – Request for Approval of Change in Plans ATTACHMENT B - ESTIMATE OF LEVEL OF EFFORT AND ASSOCIATED COSTPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 2018 RTBR PROGRAMUnited City of Yorkville, ILENTITY:ADMIN. WORKPRINCIPAL SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR ITEM COSTWORKIN PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT CAD PROJECT HOUR PERITEMCHARGE MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER MANAGER SURVEYOR I TECHNICIAN MANAGER TECHNICIAN ADMIN. SUMM. ITEMNO. WORK ITEM HOURLY RATE: $191 $185 $145 $133 $185 $145 $133 $168 $133 $80FINAL ENGINEERING2.1 Project Management and Administration 612 18 3,366$ 2.2 Project Meetings66 6 18 3,126$ 2.3 Geotechnical Investigation (Coordination, Field Work, Review Report)2 4 6 950$ 2.4 Analyze/Finalize Roadway Rehabilitation Methods2 4 6 950$ 2.5 Site Review, Identification of Required Improvements16 2 18 2,480$ 2.6 Prepare Pre-Final Bid Package/Exhibits- 50% 22 16 8 28 4,136$ 2.7 Prepare Pre-Final Bid Package/Exhibits - 90%4 20 8 32 4,704$ 2.8 Prepare Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost - 90%2 8 10 1,530$ 2.9 Submit Bid Package for IDOT Review2 4 6 950$ 2.10 Revise and Resubmit Bid Package for IDOT Approval/Advertisement2 16 4 22 3,222$ 2.11 Bidding and Contracting2 8 4 14 1,850$ Final Engineering Subtotal: 14 36 102 - - - - - 20 6 178 27,264$ CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING3.1 Contract Administration4 8 16 28 4,372$ 3.2 Construction Layout24 24 3,192$ 3.3 Observation and Documentation8 8 220 236 32,268$ Construction Engineering Subtotal: 12 16 - 260 - - - - - - 288 39,832$ PROJECT TOTAL: 26 52 102 260 - - - - 20 6 466 67,096 Printing = -63,956$ CCDD (Huff and Huff) = 5,000$ -$ Geotechnical (Rubino) = 2,500$ 2,660$ Material Testing (Rubino) = 5,000$ 480$ 67,096$ DIRECT EXPENSES = 12,500$ 79,596$ \\Milkyway\EEI_Storage\Docs\Public\Yorkville\2017\YO1745-C 2018 Road Program\PSA\[Attachment B - Fee Estimate.xlsx]Fee SummaryTOTAL EXPENSES = ENGINEERING SURVEYING DRAFTINGEngineering Expenses = DIRECT EXPENSESLABOR SUMMARYPROJECT ROLE:Surveying Expenses = Drafting Expenses = Administrative Expenses = TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES = WORKYear:ITEM Month:NO. WORK ITEM Week Starting:12341234123412341234123412341234123412341234FINAL DESIGN ENGINEERING2.1 Project Management and Administration2.2 Project Meetings2.3 Geotechnical Investigation (Coordination, Field Work, Review Report)2.4 Analyze/Finalize Roadway Rehabilitation Methods2.5 Site Review, Identification of Required Improvements2.6 Prepare Pre-Final Bid Package/Exhibits- 50%2.7 Prepare Pre-Final Bid Package/Exhibits- 90%2.8 Prepare Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost - 90%2.9 Submit Bid Package for IDOT Review; IDOT Review2.10 Revise and Resubmit Bid Package for IDOT Approval/Advertisement2.11 Bidding and ContractingCONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING3.1 Contract Administration3.2 Constructing Layout3.3 Observation and Documentation\\Milkyway\EEI_Storage\Docs\Public\Yorkville\2017\YO1745-C 2018 Road Program\PSA\[Attachment C - Schedule.xls]ScheduleLegendProject Management & QC/QA PreliminaryMeeting(s) Design Work ItemBidding and Contracting ConstructionATTACHMENT C:ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE2018 RTBR PROGRAMUNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILDecemberNovember2017May2018August SeptemberJanuary February March April June July ()-()- ()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-)()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()- ()- ()-()-()-()-()- ()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-( )-)()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()- ()- ()-()-()- Madison StMadison CtBridgeSpring Main MillVan Emmon Park Somonauk Center Benjamin OrangeState TeriDeerapl e McHughElm KingOmahaLibertyB a r b e r r y HeustisWashington WackerJackson BruellFreemontBeaverMorganChurchAdrian Ka BristolColonial Madison Coltonhite Oak Blaine F o x b o r o Wolf ked CreekElizabeth BadgerGardenGame FarmAdamsGawneWi n d s o r Ridge Illini Wooden BridgeOlsenWest Walter Martin Wood SaWoodworthDolph WorsleyHydraulic Woodland AuburnSandersOakwoodTowerDydyna R Behrens Marie SpruceBellOx f o r d JohnsonBatorTomasikVictoria Beecher Appletree Rodak Buck t hor n JeffersonB u h r ma s t e r Spicebush Wooddale StateRidge MainDolph MainS c h o ol h o u s eMorganMainHydraulic Legend 2018 RTBR PROGRAM ()-()-()- ( )-()-()-()-TimberCreek ArcadiaPavillion LegionHighview Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 (630) 466-6700 PROPOSED 2018 RTBR PROGRAM LOCATION MAP www.eeiweb.com DATE: PROJECT NO.: FILE: PATH: BY: September 2017 YO1739 YO1739_2018 Road Program .MXD H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2017\ MJT United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 630-553-4350 ³IL Route 71 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #7 Tracking Number PW 2017-70 US Rt 30 Improvements (Rt 47 – Rt 31) Public Works Committee – October 17, 2017 Consideration of Approval Review of LOU Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Attached is a letter from IDOT regarding the above referenced project. The intent of the letter is to confirm concurrence with the proposed improvement plan and the cost participation responsibilities for the project. Currently, the work is not included in IDOT’s FY 2019-2023 Proposed Highway Improvement Program. IDOT is in the process of concluding the Phase I study of this project. The general scope of the work for this improvement consists of roadway widening and reconstruction to provide two lanes in each direction separated by a raised median, pedestrian and bicycle accommodations, and drainage improvements. A location map and set of preliminary plans are attached. The area within the City’s jurisdiction is the southeast corner of Rt 47 and US Rt 30. Currently, the shared use path is planned on the south and the sidewalk on the north side of the road. The total local share is anticipated to be $28,980 as noted below. Cost Share Item Est. Local Share of Const. Cost Est. Local Share of Eng. Cost Total Est. Local Cost Share Sidewalk $12,600 $1,890 $14,490 Shared Use Path $12,600 $1,890 $14,490 Total: $28,980 After construction, the Cities maintenance responsibilities will be 100% of the shared-use path and sidewalk. The responsibilities noted above are consistent with IDOT policy and recent City/IDOT agreements. Note that the City may choose not to participate in the pedestrian or bicycle accommodations. We have attached the plan from the ITP Study that does indicate an east/west trail to the east of Rt 47 and south of US Rt 30. The proposed trail along US Rt 30 would replace that trail. The City also has an option to upgrade the landscape medians. Any upgrade would require a commitment to maintain. Action Required: IDOT is seeking the following decisions at this time: 1. Concurrence with project scope. 2. Concurrence with shared-use path scope, costs and long-term maintenance. 3. Concurrence with sidewalk scope, costs and long-term maintenance. 4. Concurrence with landscaped median long-term maintenance. If you have any questions or require additional information, please let us know. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: October 2, 2017 Subject: US Rt 30 Improvements (Rt 47 to Rt 31) Study Limits US Route 30 IL 47 to East of Albright Road PROJECT LOCATION MAP US Route 30 Illinois Route 47 to Illinois Route 31 Kendall and Kane Counties P-91-403-11 Legend US 30 Phase I Study Limits: IL 47 to East of Albright Road (4.7 miles) IL 47/US 30 District Three Kendall County Kane County District One Blackberry Creek Baseline Rd Bertram Rd Baseline Rd IL 47 US 30 Gordon Rd Lakewood Creek Rd Griffen Rd Galena Rd Albright Rd ()()()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-)()-()-()-()-()-()-()-Jericho RdBase Line RdBertram RdStar LnIllinois Route 47BridgeBaselineEngineering Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6700 / www.eeiweb.conBIKE/PEDESTRIAN PATHSLOCATION MAPDATE:OCTOBER 2017United City of Yorkville800 Game Farm RoadYorkville, IL 60560(630) 553-4350http://www.yorkville.il.usU.S. ROUTE 30IMPROVEMENTSUNITED CITY OF YORKVILLEKENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOISCONSULTING ENGINEERSNO. DATE REVISIONSPROJECT NO.:YO1238PATH:H:/GIS/PUBLIC/YORKVILLE/2012/YO1238-RT 30 PATHS.MXDFILE:fffääNORTH1,000 0 1,000500 FeetU.S. 30PLANNED RT 30SIDEWALKPLANNED RT 47PATHPLANNED RT 30SHARED USE PATHYORKVILLE CORPORATELIMITSAREA SUBJECT TO AGREEMENT SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT 349 KENDALL KANE/ TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SHEET NO. OF SHEETS STA. TO STA. SCALE: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-cover_p&ps.dgn bdecraeneUSER NAME = PLOT SCALE =100.0000 ' / in. PLOT DATE =6/16/2017 = DATE DESIGNED CHECKED DRAWN - - - - REVISED - - - - REVISED REVISED REVISED F.A.P. 134 1 ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PRELIMINARY PRINT PROJECT AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES SUBJECT TO REVISIONS INDEX OF SHEETS U.S. Rte. 30 IL. RTE. 47U. S. Rte. 3 0U.S. Rte. 30Bertram Rd.Dickson Rd.Prescott Dr.Orchard Rd.Griffin Dr.Baseline Rd.IL. Rte. 31Gordon Rd.Lakewood Creek Dr.Blackberry Rd.Horseman Trail2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18192021232425262830312922 273332 Oakton Rd. PLAN AND PROFILES P-91-403-11 KENDALL & KANE COUNTIES IL. RTE. 47 TO IL. RTE. 31 U.S. RTE. 30 PHASE I STUDY OAKTON RD. BASELINE RD. HORSEMAN TRAIL ORCHARD RD. BLACKBERRY RD. GRIFFIN DR. LAKEWOOD CREEK DR. PRESCOTT DR. GORDON RD. DICKSON RD. BERTRAM RD. U.S. RTE. 30 COVER SHEET 33 to 34 32 31 28 to 30 27 26 25 24 22 to 23 21 20 2 to 19 1 DATE: 6/19/2017 635 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 635 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-1.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED SHEET 1 OF 33 SHEETS STA.1006+00 TO STA.1021+00 - - - - - - - - Default 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 MATCH LINE STA 1021+00PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 F.A.P. 349 KENDALL KANE/234 1006+00 1007+00 1008+00 1009+00 1010+00 1011+00 1012+00 1013+00 1014+00 1015+00 1016+00 1017+00 1018+00 1019+00 1020+00 1021+00 PR PVMT PR PVMT11'11'24'US RTE 30 (BASELINE RD) PR US RTE 30 PGL 24'15'15'24'IL RTE 47KENDALL COUNTY KANE COUNTY STANDARD BANK & TRUST 14-33-400-018 DONALD E SCHRAMM 02-04-100-007 ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 PR 10' PATH 80'85'EX GND LINE PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G55.36'62.11'55.36' RT 1013+15.67 PR 5' SW PR SOD SURF 8'8'8'8'LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (PRELIMINARY LAYOUT) INTERSECTION BY DISTRICT 3 IL RTE 47 / US RTE 30 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1017+50 PROJECT BEGINS PR 8' SHLD PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR 8' SHLD LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY DISTRICT 3 PROFILE PR A/C AND ROW 85.00' LT STA 1012+53.51 80.00' RT STA 1014+09.778'12'12'7'62.11' LT 1010+63.87 97.11' RT 1010+71.62 3'3'3'3'WETLANDS 80.00 RRT STA 1019+95.00 LOCATION DETENTION STANDARD BANK & TRUST 14-33-378-001TSTS HMA HMABILLBOARD YORKVILLE ROB ROY CREEKPL EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROWONLYONLY ONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLY ONLY 1010+00 1015+00 1020+00 320+00VPI STA. 1008+00.00ELEVATION 656.65-0.50%+1.10% 200.00' V.C.VPI STA. 1010+05.80ELEVATION 658.91+1.42%VPI STA. 1010+45.80ELEVATION 659.41+1.00%-1.00%VPI STA. 1010+85.80ELEVATION 658.83-1 .50%VPI STA. 1012+50.00ELEVATION 656.37-1 .50%+0.50% 300.00' V.C.+00.00 EL. 657.15+00.00 EL. 657.75+00.00 EL. 658.62+00.00 EL. 657.12K = 125 +1.10% -1 .75% K = 150 VPI STA. 1018+00.00ELEVATION 659.12+0.50%-0.46% 160.00' V.C. K = 167 SSD = 1204'+20.00 EL. 658.72+80.00 EL. 658.75657.03657.00656.87656.65656.58656.63656.84656.17657.20657.51657.62657.46657.22657.17656.80656.87656.78656.94657.07657.07657.28657.38657.36657.43657.55657.56657.65657.75657.84657.84657.92657.65657.40657.15657.00657.05657.30657.75658.30658.85659.37658.62657.95657.45657.12656.95656.95657.12657.37657.62657.87658.12658.37658.62658.84658.93658.86658.66658.43658.20657.97657.74 635 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 635 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-2.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED SHEET 2 OF 33 SHEETS STA.1021+00 TO STA.1036+00 - - - - - - - - Default 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 MATCH LINE STA 1021+00MATCH LINE STA 1036+00PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 3KENDALL KANE/349 F.A.P. 34 1021+00 1022+00 1023+00 1024+00 1025+00 1026+00 1027+00 1028+00 1029+00 1030+00 1031+00 1032+00 1033+00 1034+00 1035+00 1036+00 PR PVMT PR PVMT 24'15'15'24'24'15'15'24'PR US RTE 30 PGL US RTE 30 (BASELINE RD) STANDARD BANK & TRUST 14-33-400-018 DONALD E SCHRAMM 02-04-100-007 DONALD J & CAROL S HAMMAN REVOC. TRS. 14-33-400-017 PR 10' PATH ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 EX GND LINE PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW PR A/C AND ROW55.58'62.36'12' +42.0 ~24'+42.0 ~ 24' PR 5' SW PR SOD SURF 8'8'8'8'LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR 8' SHLD PR 8' SHLD PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G FE +00.0 ~85'80'LOCATION DETENTION3'3'3'3'80.00 RRT STA 1022+05.00 HMA FEAGG FE DIRT FE PL PL EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW 1025+00 1030+00 1035+00 VPI STA. 1034+50.03ELEVATION 657.51-0.50%+0.50% 160.00' V.C.+70.03 EL. 657.91+30.03 EL. 657.91VPI STA. 1022+00.00ELEVATION 657.28+0.80% 160.00' V.C.VPI STA. 1027+00.00ELEVATION 661.26+0.80%-0.50% 160.00' V.C.+80.00 EL. 657.91+20.00 EL. 660.62+80.00 EL. 660.86K = 123 SSD = 913' K = 160 -0.46% K = 127 +20.00 EL. 657.65657.92658.03658.10658.17658.22658.31658.37658.46658.52658.63658.72658.81658.85658.97659.02659.11659.17659.22659.29659.39659.44659.51659.58659.66659.77659.80659.93659.97660.09660.19660.34660.51660.26660.01659.76659.51659.26659.01658.76658.51658.26658.01657.79657.71657.79658.01658.26659.27659.67660.06660.46660.82661.00660.97660.76657.74657.54657.53657.71658.07658.47658.87 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100MATCH LINE STA 1036+00MATCH LINE STA 1051+00SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-3.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED SHEET 3 OF 33 SHEETS STA.1036+00 TO STA.1051+00 - - - - - - - - Default PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 349 F.A.P. KENDALL KANE/434 1036+00 1037+00 1038+00 1039+00 1040+00 1041+00 1042+00 1043+00 1044+00 1045+00 1046+00 1047+00 1048+00 1049+00 1050+00 1051+0024'15'15'24'24'15'15'24'PR PVMT PR PVMT PR US RTE 30 PGL US RTE 30 (BASELINE RD) DONALD J & CAROL S HAMMAN REVOC. TRS. 14-33-400-017 DONALD J & CAROL S HAMMAN REVOC. TRS. 14-34-300-005 ROBERT A PETERS SR., TRUST 02-04-200-001 DONALD E SCHRAMM 02-04-100-003 PR 10' PATH ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 EX GND LINE EX SEC LINE PR A/C AND ROW PR A/C AND ROW PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G (TYP) PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G (TYP) EX SEC LINE 80'85'57.07'62.38'+9824' +45.6 ~ 12' +48.8 ~+0024' PR 5' SW 8'8'8'8'R=6' R=6'+13+8312'12'6'+15+856'12'12'270' TAPER 270' TAPER 115' STORAGE 115' STORAGE PR SM PR SM PR SOD SURF PR SOD SURF PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G 3'LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION 80.00' RT STA 1040+34.23 95.00' RT STA 1040+34.23 80.00' RT STA 1040+64.23 95.00' RT STA 1040+64.23 TEMP ESMT3'PR 8' SHLD PR 8' SHLD PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G FE +50.0 ~3'3'3'3'R HMA FDN FE AGG PE PL PL EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW 1040+00 1045+00 1050+00 +0.50%660.34660.48660.64660.84661.01661.20661.42661.58661.88662.12662.35662.60662.81663.09663.23663.42663.62663.81663.99664.14664.38664.60664.81665.03665.22665.46665.43665.66665.86666.34666.56658.26658.51658.76659.01659.26659.51659.76660.01660.26660.51660.76661.01661.26661.51661.76662.01662.26662.51662.76663.01663.26663.51663.76664.01664.26664.51664.76665.01665.26665.51665.76 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-4.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED SHEET 4 OF 33 SHEETS STA.1051+00 TO STA.1066+00 - - - - - - - - Default 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100MATCH LINE STA 1051+00MATCH LINE STA 1066+00PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 5KENDALL KANE/349 F.A.P. 34 1051+00 1052+00 1053+00 1054+00 1055+00 1056+00 1057+00 1058+00 1059+00 1060+00 1061+00 1062+00 1063+00 1064+00 1065+00 1066+00 24'15'15'24'24'12'15'15'24'NORTH STAR TRUST COMPANY FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN CHICAGO 02-03-100-001 ALCANTAR ARTURO & LIDIA 14-34-400-002 US RTE 30 (BASELINE RD) PR PVMT PR PVMT PR US RTE 30 PGL BERTRAM RD92°19'25" DONALD J & CAROL S HAMMAN REVOC. TRS. 14-34-300-003 ~ BERTRAM RD STA 10+00.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1064+32.42 R=6' R=8' R=360' PR 10' PATH ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 R=50' EX GND LINE PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW PR A/C AND ROW PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G 62.26' LT 1064+17.24 1 1 62.25' LT 1064+83.25 80'85'57.07'62.38'12' +86.0 ~+05+75+90+813'220' STORAGE PR 5' SW PR SOD SURF PR SM PR SOD SURF8'8'8'270' TAPER 12'6'12'70'PR SM R=60' R=55' LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PR ROWEX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX ROWEX ROWR=50' 70.00' LT STA 1065+03.36 90.00' LT STA 1064+83.64 R=300' LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP) PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR 8' SHLD PR 8' SHLD PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G FOR DETAILS) (SEE BERTRAM P&P ~ PR BERTRAM RD 6'4'WATER QUALITY LOCATION 85.00' LT STA 1063+90.84 R=10' PR CURB TRANSITION 3'3'3'3'S G B R R G R HMAAGG PE2-6" 24" 16"10" 6" 6" 8" PE AGG PL PL PLONLYONLY 1055+00 1060+00 1065+00 10+00VPI STA. 1062+50.00ELEVATION 671.51+0.50%-0.50% 160.00' V.C.+70.00 EL. 671.11+30.00 EL. 671.11K = 160 SSD = 1159'666.56666.71666.94667.12667.33667.54667.79668.01668.28668.41668.64668.85669.08669.27669.52669.69669.94670.17670.26670.35670.49670.53670.57670.56670.60670.57670.48670.39670.33670.19670.09665.76666.01666.26666.51666.76667.01667.26667.51667.76668.01668.26668.51668.76669.01669.26669.51669.76670.01670.26670.51670.76671.01671.23671.31671.23671.01670.76670.51670.26670.01669.76 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-5.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 5 OF 33 SHEETS STA.1066+00 TO STA.1081+00 - - - - - - - - Default 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100MATCH LINE STA 1066+00MATCH LINE STA 1081+00PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 6KENDALL KANE/349 34 1066+00 1067+00 1068+00 1069+00 1070+00 1071+00 1072+00 1073+00 1074+00 1075+00 1076+00 1077+00 1078+00 1079+00 1080+00 1081+00 US RTE 30 (BASELINE RD)DICKSON RD24'12'15'15'24'24'24'PR PVMT PR PVMT M&N SUGAR GROVE HOLDINGS, LLC & ET. AL. 14-34-400-004 NORTH STAR TRUST COMPANY FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN CHICAGO 02-03-100-001 PR US RTE 30 PGL 90°34'36" ~ DICKSON RD STA 28+00.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1075+32.44 DONALD J & CAROL S HAMMAN 02-03-200-007 R=360' R=8' R=6' ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 PR PATH 10' (TYP) R=50' R=300' 270' TAPER R=60' 220' TAPER 215' STORAGE220' TAPER EX GND LINE PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW PR A/C AND ROW PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW 58.87' RT 1075+04.12 58.92' RT 1075+64.12 80'70'58.64'61.16'+00.0 ~ 24' +00.0 ~+89+80+6524'12'+38220' STORAGE 215' STORAGE +32+52+1815'15'PR 5' SW +95PR SM PR SOD SURF PR SOD SURF 8'8'8'PR SM 3'12'6'12'R=200' R=200' 80.00' RT STA 1074+61.99 107.71' RT STA 1074+88.52 106.80' RT STA 1075+78.52 80.00' RT STA 1076+04.79 PR ROWPR ROWLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP) LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PR 8' SHLD (TYP) PR 8' SHLD PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G10'4'FOR DETAILS) (SEE DICKSON P&P ~ PR DICKSON RD R=10' PR CURB TRANSITION3'3'3'3'+45NOISE WALL B3 HMAHMA DIRT FE AGG FE PL PL EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX ROWEX ROWONLYONLYONLY ONLY 1070+00 1075+00 1080+00 VPI STA. 1074+00.00ELEVATION 665.76-0.50%+0.52% 160.00' V.C.+20.00 EL. 666.16+80.00 EL. 666.18K = 157 670.09669.84669.74669.56669.40669.21669.04668.89668.72668.54668.38668.26668.08667.88667.69667.58667.40667.34667.36667.42667.53667.67667.89668.12668.35668.54668.83669.04669.29669.51669.70669.76669.51669.26669.01668.76668.51668.26668.01667.76667.51667.26667.01666.76666.51666.26666.04665.97666.05666.28666.54666.80667.06667.31667.57667.83668.09668.35668.61668.87669.13669.38 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690 MATCH LINE STA. 1081+00MATCH LINE STA. 1096+000 50 SCALE IN FEET 100SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-6.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 6 OF 33 SHEETS STA.1081+00 TO STA.1096+00 - - - - - - - - Default PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 7KENDALL KANE/349 34 1081+00 1082+00 1083+00 1084+00 1085+00 1086+00 1087+00 1088+00 1089+00 1090+00 1091+00 1092+00 1093+00 1094+00 1095+00 1096+00 US RTE 30 (BASELINE RD)24'15'15'24'PR PVMT DONALD J. & CAROL S. HAMMAN 02-03-200-007 PR US RTE 30 PGL MONTALBANO BUILDERS INC 14-34-484-006 VILLAGE OF MONTGOMERY 14-34-486-020 VILLAGE OF MONTGOMERY 14-35-352-013 & KATHLEEN A RAMSEY LAWRENCE H SLATTERY 02-03-200-001 PR 10' PATH 300' TAPER ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 80'70'PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW EX GND LINE59.79'59.57'12' +55.7 ~+5824'15'15'24' PR SOD SURF PR PVMT PR 5' SW 8'8'8'8'+72LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PR 8' SHLD PR 8' SHLD PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G3'3'3'3'NOISE WALL B3 DONALD J. & CAROL S. HAMMAN 02-03-200-007 HMA R R R S B B R SILO SILOHMAHMAHMA HMAHMAHMAH MA HMAHMAHMAR RR R R R R RR R R R R POOL MONTGOMERY R HMA18" 10" 14" 15" 24" 24" 24" 20" 2-24" 20" 18" 18" 12" BIT PE 12"10"12"22"4-6" PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPLPLPLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW 1085+00 1090+00 1095+00 +0.52%669.70669.97670.23670.40670.73670.94671.17671.36671.63671.83672.11672.35672.61672.81673.05673.22673.54673.77673.97674.16674.39674.65674.94675.21675.49675.77675.99676.22676.44676.69676.92669.38669.64669.90670.16670.42670.68670.94671.19671.45671.71671.97672.23672.49672.75673.00673.26673.52673.78674.04674.30674.56674.81675.07675.33675.59675.85676.11676.37676.62676.88677.14672.71672.97673.23 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690 695 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690 695SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-7.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 7 OF SHEETS STA.1096+00 TO STA.1111+00 - - - - - - - - Default MATCH LINE STA 1096+00MATCH LINE STA 1111+00(GORDON RD) MATCH LINE STA 38+00 MATCH LINE STA 42+00 (GORDON RD) 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY 33 PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 8KENDALL KANE/349 34 1096+00 1097+00 1098+00 1099+00 1100+00 1101+00 1102+00 1103+00 1104+00 1105+00 1106+00 1107+00 1108+00 1109+00 1110+00 1111+00 US RTE 30 (BASELINE RD)GORDONRDPR PVMT PR PVMT VILLAGE OF MONTGOMERY 14-35-354-018 & SWC 73RD & STONEY GENEVA FARGO LLC 02-02-101-001 & SWC 73RD & STONEY GENEVA FARGO LLC 02-02-101-004 DONALD J & CAROL S HAMMAN 02-02-101-003 DRH CAMBRIDGE HOMES INC 14-35-355-012 90°00'00" 90°34'51" PR US RTE 30 PGL 24'11'11'24'~ GORDON RD STA 40+00.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1100+95.34 R=4' PR 10' PATH 240' STORAGE 240' STORAGE 215' STORAGE220' TAPER R=55' R=60' R=60' 215' STORAGE 310' STORAGE 300' TAPER 220' TAPER EX GND LINE PR A/C AND ROW PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW GORDON RD ~ EX & PR 60.69' RT 1100+48.96 84.62' RT 1101+68.46 US RTE 30 ~ EX & PR CONC C&G PR B-6.24 COMB 60.79' RT 1101+94.63 59.48' LT 1100+25.80 79.28' LT 1100+46.02 R=60' 79.18' LT 1101+46.03 59.48' LT 1101+65.80 80'70'60.67'59.43'24'11'11'24'12'+18.8 ~ 12'+58+00+04+047'7'+8712'PR A/C AND ROW ~ EX & PR US RTE 3011'PR SM PR 10' PATH PR SOD SURF PR SM8'8'PR 5' SW (TYP)8'R=70' R=150' R=7' R=55' R=55' R=200' R=200' R=55' R=55'16'16'80'70'+92+04+94+1475'PR SOD SURF 8'8'PR A/C AND ROW 113.47' LT STA 1100+46.59 75.00' LT STA 1102+41.11 170.00' LT STA 1101+47.05 R=150' LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP) LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP) 75.00' LT STA 1107+00.00 MONTGOMERY VILLAGE OF 14-35-382-030 80.00' RT STA 1101+95.34 105.00' RT STA 1101+68.01 80.00' RT STA 1099+44.24 170.00' RT STA 1100+46.54 80.00' RT STA 1107+34.79 100.00' RT STA 1107+34.79 100.00' RT STA 1106+94.79 80.00' RT STA 1106+94.79 ESMT TEMP 300' TRANSITION FROM 30' MEDIAN TO 22' MEDIAN+04+04PR 8' SHLD PR 8' SHLD PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G (SEE GORDON P&P FOR DETAILS) (SEE GORDON P&P FOR DETAILS) 10' 10'10'10'28'25'11'80.00' RT STA 1109+50.00 95.00' RT STA 1110+00.00 70.00' LT STA 1108+00.00 95'WATER QUALITY LOCATION PARTIALLY SHADOWED APPROACH TAPER (1:75 RATE) R=20' R=10' R=10' R=4' R=20' 24'24'3'3'EX A/C AND ROW 3'3'+37NOISE WALL B3 NOISE WALL B4+9821' 17' R=65' 70.00' LT STA 1100+02.65 R=25' R=20' R=55' DONALD J. & CAROL S. HAMMAN 02-03-200-007 TS R R R R R R RHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMASS ROCK ROCK HMA(TEL) R R R R R R HMAHMAHMAHMAHMAH MA S FDN FDN FDN MONTGOMERY AGG PEPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPLPLPLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPLPL PL PL P LPLPL PL PL PL EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX ROWEX ROWEX ROWEX ROWEX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW ONLY ONLYONLYONLYONLY ONLYONLYONLYONLYONLY 1100+00 1105+00 1110+00 40+00VPI STA. 1103+00.00ELEVATION 680.76+0.52%-0.50% 160.00' V.C.+20.00 EL. 680.35+80.00 EL. 680.36K = 157 SSD = 1141' -0.50%676.92677.12677.32677.59677.83678.07678.25678.36678.57678.54678.74678.77678.89678.91678.93678.89678.77678.73678.61678.45678.31678.25678.04677.82677.65677.48677.27677.07676.88676.72676.49677.14677.40677.66677.92678.18678.43678.69678.95679.21679.47679.73679.99680.24680.47680.56680.48680.26680.01679.76679.51679.26679.01678.76678.51678.26678.01677.76677.51677.26677.01676.76 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-8.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 8 OF 33 SHEETS STA.1111+00 TO STA.1126+00 - - - - - - - - Default MATCH LINE STA 1111+00MATCH LINE STA 1126+000 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 9KENDALL KANE/349 34 1111+00 1112+00 1113+00 1114+00 1115+00 1116+00 1117+00 1118+00 1119+00 1120+00 1121+00 1122+00 1123+00 1124+00 1125+00 1126+00 24'11'11'24'PRESCOTT DRUS RTE 30 (BASELINE RD)24'11'11'24'6'PR PVMT 90°00'00" DONALD J & CAROL S HAMMAN 02-02-101-003 LAKEWOOD CREEK WEST HOMEOWNERS 02-02-135-008 LAKEWOOD CREEK WEST HOMEOWNERS 02-02-134-021 FOXMOOR TOWNHOME OWNERS ASSN 14-35-458-007 VILLAGE OF MONTGOMERY 14-35-458-006 VILLAGE OF MONTGOMERY 14-35-382-030 PR US RTE 30 PGL ~ PRESCOTT DR STA 57+50.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1117+72.70 R=2' R=8' R=3' PR 10' PATH PR 10' PATH R=45' ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 215' STORAGE 220' TAPER 12'EX GND LINE PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G ~ EX & PR PRESCOTT DR 75'70'60.58'59.39'1 90.62' RT 1117+41.99 2 90.61' RT 1118+07.92 60.53' RT 1118+37.91 60.55' RT 1117+12.07 +52+15+30R=45' R=35'5'PR SOD SURF PR SM SURF, 4" PR CONC MED PR SOD SURF+50PR 5' SW 95'8'8'PR SM 4'8'8'75.00' RT STA 1117+02.70 132.36' RT STA 1117+41.97 132.36' RT STA 1118+07.90 70.00' RT STA 1118+42.70 R=70' PR A/C AND ROW PR A/C AND ROW LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP)75.00' RT STA 1113+85.72 PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR 8' SHLD (TYP) PR 8' SHLD (SEE PRESCOTT P&P FOR DETAILS)10'95.00' RT STA 1113+85.96 WATER QUALITY LOCATION R=200' R=10' R=10' R=20'R=200'1:14 TAPERTAPER1:144'3'3'3'3' 70.00' LT STA 1125+00.00 NOISE WALL B4 NOISE WALL B5 NOISE WALL B5+66+30+19RRR HMA HMAHMAR R R R R R R RHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMA H MA R HMAHMARHMAHMAHMARR HMAHMAHMAHMAH MA R R R RR R H MA HMAHMARR SPOOL R R RRHMA HMA HMA HMA R R R R R R R HMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMA MONTGOMERY PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPLPL PL PLPL P LP LP LP LP LP LP LP LP LP LP LP LP LPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX ROWEX ROW 1115+00 1120+00 1125+00 55+00-0.50%676.49676.24676.13675.93675.67675.47675.29675.05674.85674.66674.47674.29674.10673.90673.73673.55673.34673.12672.96672.76672.58672.41672.22672.02671.84671.58671.36671.09670.71670.45670.07676.76676.51676.26676.01675.76675.51675.26675.01674.76674.51674.26674.01673.76673.51673.26673.01672.76672.51672.26672.01671.76671.51671.26671.01670.76670.51670.26670.01669.76669.51669.26 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-9.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 9 OF 33 SHEETS STA.1126+00 TO STA.1141+00 - - - - - - - - Default MATCH LINE STA 1126+00MATCH LINE STA 1141+000 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 KENDALL KANE/349 1034 1126+00 1127+00 1128+00 1129+00 1130+00 1131+00 1132+00 1133+00 1134+00 1135+00 1136+00 1137+00 1138+00 1139+00 1140+00 1141+00 24'11'11'24'24'11'11'24'US RTE 30 (BASELINE RD) PR US RTE 30 PGL PR PVMT PR PVMT DRH CAMBRIDGE HOMES INC 14-35-457-002 COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO 14-35-400-004 FOX VALLEY PARK DISTRICT 14-35-400-003 LAKEWOOD CREEK WEST HOMEOWNERS 02-02-134-021 COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO 02-02-200-002 LAKEWOOD CREEK HOMEOWNERS ASSN 02-02-201-023 PR 10' PATH ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 220' TAPER PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW PR A/C AND ROW EX GND LINE80'75'60.38'59.31'+09.3 ~ 12'+69PR SOD SURF PR 5' SW 80'75'70'8'8'+898'12'75.00' LT STA 1126+00.00 (BY OTHERS) CONNECTION FUTURE PATH 70.00' RT STA 1127+00.00 80.00' RT STA 1129+00.00 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TO BE ABANDONED EXISTING ENTRANCE PR 8' SHLD PR 8' SHLD PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G 125.00' RT STA 1134+50.00125'125.00' RT STA 1131+50.00 80.00' RT STA 1130+91.53 85.01' RT STA 1135+00.00 80.00' RT STA 1136+00.12 WATER QUALITY LOCATION LOCATION WATER QUALITY TO BE ABANDONED EXISTING ENTRANCE 3'3'3'3'WETLANDS NOISE WALL B4 NOISE WALL B5 NOISE WALL B6+20+92+34R R RRRRRHMA HMAHMAHMAHMA R HMAR HMAR HMAR HMARHMAHMA MONTGOMERY (TEL) (TEL) (TEL) (TEL) R H MA HMA W FH WV AGG PE DIRT PE AGG FE DIRT FE PL PL PL PL L L L L PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPLPL PL PLPL PL P LPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPLPLPLPL PL EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW ONLY 1130+00 1135+00 1140+00 VPI STA. 1128+50.00ELEVATION 668.01-0.50%-0.30% 160.00' V.C.VPI STA. 1137+00.00ELEVATION 665.46-0.30%+0.33% 160.00' V.C.+70.00 EL. 668.41+30.00 EL. 667.77+20.00 EL. 665.70+80.00 EL. 665.73K = 800 K = 254 670.07669.84669.48669.21668.88668.51668.19667.85667.52667.17666.86666.60666.23665.98665.69665.54665.34665.26665.20665.21665.30665.38665.52665.63665.79665.85665.92666.06666.18666.29666.39669.26669.01668.76668.51668.27668.05667.87667.71667.56667.41667.26667.11666.96666.81666.66666.51666.36666.21666.06665.91665.76665.63665.59665.64665.79665.96666.12666.29666.45666.62666.78 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-10.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 10 OF 33 SHEETS STA.1141+00 TO STA.1156+00 - - - - - - - - Default MATCH LINE STA 1141+00MATCH LINE STA 1156+000 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 349 KENDALL KANE/34 11 1141+00 1142+00 1143+00 1144+00 1145+00 1146+00 1147+00 1148+00 1149+00 1150+00 1151+00 1152+00 1153+00 1154+00 1155+00 1156+00 US RTE 30 (BASELINE RD)CREEK DRLAKEWOOD24'11'11'24'12'~ LAKEWOOD CREEK DR STA 67+50.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1144+07.41 24'11'11'24'PR PVMT PR US RTE 30 PGL90°00'00"R=3' FOX VALLEY PARK DISTRICT 14-35-400-003 FOX VALLEY PARK DISTRICT 14-36-300-005 LAKEWOOD CREEK HOMEOWNERS ASSN 02-02-227-0326'R=50' R=50' R=6' ~ EX & PR LAKEWOOD CREEK DR ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 215' STORAGE 220' TAPER 215' STORAGE EX GND LINE PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW PR A/C AND ROW PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G 60.04' RT 1143+25.75 60.01' RT 1144+45.91 75'70'59.80'63.90'+48+35R=200'5'PR SM PR SOD SURF PR SOD SURF PR 5' SW +50+7075'80'8'12'4'8'8'PR 10' PATH (TYP)PR A/C AND ROW 130.04' RT STA 1143+26.15 75.00' LT STA 1144+11.69 70.00' LT STA 1144+11.63 R=200' R=200' 110.01' RT STA 1144+46.02 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP) PARK DISTRICT FOX VALLEY 14-36-383-001 TO BE ABANDONED EXISTING ENTRANCE PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G (SEE LAKEWOOD P&P FOR DETAILS) PR 8' SHLD PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G 4'10'80.00' RT STA 1142+98.59 75.00' RT STA 1144+64.75 WATER QUALITY LOCATION R=10'1:19 TAPER1:21 TAPER3'3'3'3'NOISE WALL B6 +14NOISE WALL B6 +48HMA R HMAR HMARHMAHMARHMAHMA HMA (TEL) R R HMAHMAR HMAR HMAHMAR R HMAR HMAR HMAR HMAR HMAR HMAR HMAR HMAHMAW DIRT FE PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPLPLPLPLPL PL PL PL PL PL EX ROWEX ROWEX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW ONLY ONLYONLYONLY 1145+00 1150+00 1155+00 65+00VPI STA. 1147+00.00ELEVATION 668.76-0.50% 160.00' V.C.+80.00 EL. 668.36+0.33%+20.00 EL. 668.50VPI STA. 1154+00.00ELEVATION 665.26-0.50%+0.63% 180.00' V.C.+10.00 EL. 665.71+90.00 EL. 665.83K = 193 SSD = 1380' K = 159 666.39666.49666.54666.72666.79666.87666.97667.07667.14667.20667.22667.21667.15667.04667.02666.88666.81666.75666.66666.58666.50666.35666.26666.13666.02665.81665.79665.72665.79665.84665.86668.01667.76667.51667.26667.01666.76666.51666.26666.01666.78666.95667.11667.28667.44667.61667.77667.94668.10668.27668.43668.57668.60668.49668.26665.76665.56665.52665.63665.89666.21666.52 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-11.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 11 OF 33 SHEETS STA.1156+00 TO STA.1171+00 - - - - - - - - Default MATCH LINE STA 1156+00MATCH LINE STA 1171+000 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 349 KENDALL KANE/34 12 1156+00 1157+00 1158+00 1159+00 1160+00 1161+00 1162+00 1163+00 1164+00 1165+00 1166+00 1167+00 1168+00 1169+00 1170+00 1171+00 24'11'11'24'12'24'12'24'~ GRIFFIN DR STA 80+00.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1168+38.83 PR PVMT US RTE 30 (BASELINE RD)GRIFFINDRPR US RTE 30 PGL 90°00'00"R=3' VILLAGE OF MONTGOMERY 14-36-380-001 VILLAGE OF MONTGOMERY 14-36-381-001 HOMEOWNERS ASSN LAKEWOOD CREEK 02-01-103-045 HOMEOWNERS ASSN LAKEWOOD CREEK 02-02-227-032 PR 10' PATH ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 215' STORAGE220' TAPER R=50' 215' STORAGE EX GND LINE PR A/C AND ROW PR A/C AND ROW R=50'75'70'59.69'64.10'59.49' RT 1167+76.93 59.58' RT 1168+96.93 R=50' 64.49' LT 1169+00.97 +29+49+66R=3'5'+145'PR 10' PATH PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G (TYP) PR SOD SURF PR SM PR SM 6'PR 5' SW 80'75'8'8'4'R=55' R=55'6'4'8'8'PR 10' PATH PR A/C AND ROW PR A/C AND ROW ~ EX & PR GRIFFIN DR LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP) LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP) FOX VALLEY PARK DISTRICT 14-36-383-001 VILLAGE OF MONTGOMERY 14-36-383-002 131.27' RT STA 1167+77.60 70.00' LT STA 1167+35.85 89.64' LT STA 1167+81.12 139.58' RT STA 1168+97.68 79.99' RT STA 1169+18.53 89.34' LT STA 1169+01.18 75.00' LT STA 1169+45.87 PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G (TYP) PR 8' SHLD (SEE GRIFFIN P&P FOR DETAILS)4'10'4'10'4' 10' 4' 10' 75.00' RT STA 1167+56.84 75.00' LT STA 1170+78.30 95.00' LT STA 1170+78.52 95'WATER QUALITY LOCATION TO BE ABANDONED EXISTING ENTRANCE R=200'R=200' R=20' R=10' 64.44' LT 1167+80.90 R=200' R=10' R=10' R=200' R=20'3'3'3'3'WETLANDS NOISE WALL B6 NOISE WALL B8 +07+70RHMAR HMA MONTGOMERY R S R HMAR HMAR HMAR HMAR HMAHMAR R HMARHMARHMARHMA HMA (CATV) (CATV) TS R R SIREN WV FH W TPED SAN DIRT FE PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLP LP LPL PL PL PL PL PLPL PL PL PL PLPLPLPLPL PLPL PL EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROWEX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX ROWEX ROWEX ROWEX ROWONLY ONLYONLYONLY 1160+00 1165+00 1170+00 80+00VPI STA. 1162+00.00ELEVATION 670.31+0.63%-0.60% 200.00' V.C. K = 162 SSD = 973'+00.00 EL. 669.68+00.00 EL. 669.71665.86665.88666.07666.19666.39666.52666.63666.76666.91667.02667.08667.32667.65667.47667.60667.66667.64667.59667.57667.49667.27667.12666.96666.82666.58666.43666.22666.05665.85665.71665.51666.52666.84667.16667.47667.79668.10668.42668.73669.05669.36668.80668.50668.19667.89667.59667.29666.98666.68666.38666.08665.77665.47665.17664.87669.68669.92670.00669.93669.71669.40669.10 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 MATCH LINE STA 1171+00MATCH LINE STA 1186+000 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-12.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 12 OF SHEETS STA.1171+00 TO STA.1186+00 - - - - - - - - Default PRELIMINARY 33 PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 KENDALL KANE/349 1334 1171+00 1172+00 1173+00 1174+00 1175+00 1176+00 1177+00 1178+00 1179+00 1180+00 1181+00 1182+00 1183+00 1184+00 1185+00 1186+00 US RTE 30 (BASELINE RD) PR PVMT PR US RTE 30 PGL FIVE H LLC 14-36-451-001 JAMES J GORSE 14-36-477-001 JOHN T DAY 14-36-477-002 JOHN T DAY 14-36-477-003 ORCHARD PRAIRIE NORTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 02-01-127-001 PR 10' PATH ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 220' TAPER 220' TAPER 215' STORAGE EX GND LINE PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW PR A/C AND ROW80'95'59.43'64.81'+31+51+47+67PR SM PR SOD SURF PR SM11'11'5'24'12'24'8'8'6'4'1'24'12'24'8'8'PR 10' PATH85'80.00' RT STA 1178+99.99 85.00' RT STA 1181+00.00 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR 8' SHLD 10'PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G 80.00' LT STA 1181+17.02 95.00' LT STA 1181+17.18 85.00' RT STA 1182+00.03 145.00' RT STA 1183+00.00 145'80'WATER QUALITY LOCATION LOCATION WATER QUALITY3'3'3'3'NOISE WALL B8 +21NOISE WALL B9 HMA R R R R R R R HMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAR R R R R R RHMA S 7" 24" 7"12" 14"14" 14"16" 12" 12"24" 12" 14"7" 24" 16" 14"24"18"14"14"14" 14" 12" 12"20" 12" 26" 10" 6"10" 5" 46" 30" 30"10"14" 30" 24" 8"TPED PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL P LP L P L PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPLPLPLPL PL PL PL PLPL PL EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW 1175+00 1180+00 1185+00 VPI STA. 1181+00.00ELEVATION 668.76+0.50%-0.50% 160.00' V.C.+20.00 EL. 668.36+80.00 EL. 668.36VPI STA. 1172+00.00ELEVATION 664.26-0.60%+0.50% 180.00' V.C.+10.00 EL. 664.81+90.00 EL. 664.71K = 163 K = 160 SSD = 1159'665.51665.45665.34665.23665.18665.26665.38665.43665.63665.75665.97666.09666.30666.52666.71666.92667.07667.18667.38667.45667.28667.46667.44667.37667.30667.19666.97666.96666.82666.72666.62665.01665.26665.51665.76666.01666.26666.51666.76667.01667.26667.51667.76668.01668.26668.48668.56668.48668.26668.01667.76667.51667.26667.01666.76666.51666.26664.87664.61664.51664.56664.76 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-13.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 13 OF 33 SHEETS STA.1186+00 TO STA.1201+00 - - - - - - - - Default MATCH LINE STA 1186+00MATCH LINE STA 1201+00(ORCHARD RD) MATCH LINE STA 115+00 MATCH LINE STA 119+00 (ORCHARD RD) 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 14 1186+00 1187+00 1188+00 1189+00 1190+00 1191+00 1192+00 1193+00 1194+00 1195+00 1196+00 1197+00 1198+00 1199+00 1200+00 1201+00 BLACKBERRY RDUS RTE 30 (BASELINE RD)ORCHARD RDPR US RTE 30 PGL24'12'24'24'12'~ BLACKBERRY RD STA 90+00.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1187+21.36 PR PVMT 89°22'46"~ ORCHARD RD STA 117+00.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1197+13.69 MITCHELL PAMELA F STEPHEN H & 14-36-478-018 ALFREDO & IGNACIO RUIZ 14-36-479-002 & SCHOOL LOT KECK CEMETERY 02-01-200-001 YORKVILLE LLC MCVICKERS 02-01-204-001 ORCHARD LLC MCVICKERS 02-01-200-029 R=60' R=300' PR 10' PATH (TYP) 215' STORAGE 290' STORAGE 290' STORAGE 370' STORAGE 370' STORAGE PC STA 1198+30.10 220' TAPER 300' TAPER ORCHARD RD ~ EX & PR 110'105'75'90'EX GND LINE PR A/C AND ROW CONC C&G PR B-6.24 COMB 145'85'64.61' LT 1186+88.51 64.59' LT 1187+54.51 59.89' RT 1188+42.92 69.89' RT 1188+42.88 64.41' LT 1195+14.39 70.22' RT 1196+12.71 124.53' RT 1196+57.27 FTMTGIL001 LLC ARC 02-01-200-018 69.96' RT 1198+49.88 117.67' RT 1197+97.26 64.03' LT 1197+64.39 12' +23.7 ~ +01.0 ~ 12'+73+907'+1511'11'24'485' STORAGE 11'11'+1312'8'8'R=150' R=150' R=150' R=150' R=4' R=4' R=55' R=40' R=40' R=55' 1 6'16'1 6'16'R=50' 8'8'1'R=55' +2124'24'8'PR SM +7280'89°18'55" PR SM 12'R=60' +751'+10220' TAPER R=40' AND ROW PR A/C AND ROW EX A/C 105.00' LT STA 1187+54.47 105.00' LT STA 1190+15.00 105.00' LT STA 1189+83.45 TEMP ESMT 85.00' RT STA 1187+55.10 110.00' RT STA 1193+30.51 105.00' LT STA 1195+14.83 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP) 90.00' RT STA 1198+52.51 90.00' RT STA 1199+99.72 131.64' RT STA 1198+07.27 300' TRANSITION FROM 22' MEDIAN TO 30' MEDIAN+90+90TRUSTEE BK OF AURORA, OLD SECOND NATL 15-31-378-028 FOR DETAILS) (SEE BLABKBERRY P&P ~ PR BLACKBERRY RD 10'10'215' STORAGE10'4'R=5' R=5' PR 8' SHLD+21CONC C&G (TYP) PR M-4.24 COMB (SEE ORCHARD P&P FOR DETAILS) (SEE ORCHARD P&P FOR DETAILS) PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G TO BE REMOVED (TYP) EXISTING GUARDRAIL PR A/C AND ROW+92PR 8' SHLD PR 10' PATH CONC C&G (TYP) PR M-4.24 COMB 28' 10' 10' 28'10'10'TERMINAL, TYPE 6 TRAFFIC BARRIER TERMINAL, TYPE 1 TRAFFIC BARRIER R=55' LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP) KENDALL COUNTY FOREST PRESERVE 02-01-200-033 KENDALL COUNTY FOREST PRESERVE 02-01-200-034 ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 PR SM PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G TYPE 1 (SPECIAL) TANGENT TRAFFIC BARRIER TERMINAL, GUARDRAIL, TYPE A (50') STEEL PLATE BEAM TRAFFIC BARRIER TERMINAL, TYPE 6 PR 10' PATH CREEKBLACKBERRY80.00' LT STA 1186+88.50 145.00' RT STA 1186+54.77 85.00' RT STA 1186+55.99 85'85.00' LT STA 1187+74.49 85.00' LT STA 1189+83.45 85.00' LT STA 1190+15.00 CONC C&G PR B-6.12 COMB LOCATION QUALITY WATER R=10' R=10' R=10' PARTIALLY SHADOWED APPROACH TAPER (1:75 RATE)+27+02PR PARAPET WALL3'3'3'3'75.00' LT STA 1198+49.47 R=55' AND ROW PR A/C 75.00' LT STA 1198+35.07 124.23' LT STA 1197+85.04 138.13' LT STA 1197+85.19 R=10'ESMTTEMPWETLANDS NOISE WALL B9 WALL B8 NOISE +50+88+63+86R=55' R=40' 110.00' RT STA 1196+15.78 154.91' RT STA 1196+56.80 R=30'EX ROWPR A/C AND ROW 144.14' RT STA 1196+46.97 TEMP ESMT EX ROW MCCONNELL & ELEANOR SAMUEL T 14-36-477-009 S RR R HMA TS HMAHMAMONTGOMERY DIRT BIT BITBIT PE8"8" 8" 8" 18" 10"8" 16" 10" 12"8" 8" 12" PE CONC PE BIT ROCK18" 12" 2-12" 10" 8" 10" 12" 12" 2-8" 18"2-12" 16" 2-10" PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLEX ROWEX ROWEX ROWEX ROWEX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROWONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLY ONLY ONLY ONLYONLYONLYONLY ONLY 1190+00 1195+00 1200+00 90+00 115+00PI Sta 400+18.84VPI STA. 1189+25.00ELEVATION 664.64-0.50%+0.50% 160.00' V.C.VPI STA. 1197+75.00ELEVATION 668.85+0.50%-0.50% 160.00' V.C.+45.00 EL. 665.04+05.00 EL. 665.03+95.00 EL. 668.45+55.00 EL. 668.45K = 161 K = 161 SSD = 1163'666.62666.53666.42666.27666.22666.09666.11666.18666.19666.24666.29666.42666.45666.54666.62666.81666.99667.12667.21667.47667.62667.86667.94667.77668.20668.33668.47668.52668.65668.79668.81666.26666.01665.76665.51665.26665.01664.86664.85665.01665.26665.50665.75666.00666.25666.50666.74666.99667.24667.49667.73667.98668.23668.48668.63668.63668.47668.22667.97667.72667.47667.22 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 650 655 660 665 670 675 680SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-14.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 14 OF 33 SHEETS STA.1201+00 TO STA.1216+00 - - - - - - - - Default 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100MATCH LINE STA 1201+00MATCH LINE STA 1216+00(HORSEMAN TRA IL ) MATCH L INE STA 206+00 (OLD BASELINE RD)MATCH LINE STA 303+00 PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 15 685 685 1201+00 1202+00 1203+00 1204+00 1205+00 1206+00 1207+00 1208+00 1209+00 1210+00 1211+00 1212+00 1213+00 1214+00 1215+00 1216+00 KEVIN DRUS RTE 30 ~ HORSEMAN TRAIL STA 207+50.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1208+22.61 ~ OLD BASELINE RD STA 304+41.53 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1212+27.55 PR US RTE 30 PGL24'12'11'11'24'24'15'15'24' PR PVMT STORES INC WALMART 02-01-200-022 KANE COUNTY 15-31-378-016 KANE COUNTY 15-31-378-014 TRUST, TRUSTEE OXFORD BANK & 15-31-379-004 GROUP LLC WILLIAMS 15-31-379-008 GROUP LLC WILLIAMS 15-31-379-009 GROUP LLC WILLIAMS 15-31-379-010 MIGLIORNI BARBARA R RAYMOND J & 15-31-379-011 MIGLIORINI BRIAN J 15-31-379-012 MIGLIORINI BRIAN J 15-31-379-013 DCLRN OR TR, TRUSTEE RICHARD C IMMING 15-31-380-001 K = 157 PR 10' PATH PR PATH 10' (TYP) R=30' R=45' R=45' US RTE 30 ~ EX & PR 215' STORAGE 215' STORAGE 220' TAPER 80' PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G CONC C&G PR B-6.24 COMB EX SEC LINE EX GND LINE 300' TAPER 220 ' TAPER 66.30' LT 1205+24.30 R=30' 125.45' LT 1206+13.50 126.61' LT 1206+81.00 54.82' RT 1212+85.74 7'+87+57OAKTON DR ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 220' TAPER8'PR SM PR SOD SURF PR SOD SURF 8'370' STORAGE +99+19+94+14R=8' R=45'R=3' R=6' 99°41'55"15'15'PR SM +72+9212'R=200' PR SM12'12'3'6'R=45' R=110' R=40'8'8' PR A/C AND ROW PR 5' SW 80.00' RT STA 1202+67.51 122.61' LT 1205+21.97 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP) 80.00' RT STA 1212+78.89 PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PROP. CURVE US30CUR1 PI STA. = 1208+20.53 R = 5,633.85' T = 990.43' L = 1,960.82' E = 86.40' P.C. STA. = 1198+30.10 P.T. STA. = 1217+90.92 PROP. CURVE OAKTONCUR2 PI STA. = 408+29.60 R = 5,550.00' T = 800.50' L = 1,590.03' E = 57.43' T.R. = N.C. S.E. RUN = N.C. P.C. STA. = 400+29.10 P.T. STA. = 416+19.13PR ROW(SEE HORSEMAN P&P FOR DETA ILS ) (SEE OLD BASELINE P&P FOR DETAILS) e = 2.2% T.R. = 66' S.E. RUN = 79' e = N.C. (SEE OAKTON P&P FOR DETAILS)+87CONC C&G (TYP) PR M-4.24 COMB (TYP) PR 8' SHLD PR 8' SHLD (TYP) PR 8' SHLD PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G LOCATION DETENTION 75.00' LT STA 1201+26.62 R=10'10'7'10'4' R=10' R=10'3'3'3'3' BK MONTGOMERY LLC 02-01-200-030 MONTGOMERY AUTO LLC 02-01-200-036 MONTGOMERY LLC MCVICKERS 02-01-200-037 ESTATE LLC RHOADES REAL 15-31-378-018 485' STORAGE ENTRANCE FOR FUTURE PRIVATE CURB TO BE DEPRESSED 267.21' LT STA 1201+04.11 297.61' LT STA 1205+14.41 C HMA G HMA G S R R R R G R HMA OAKTON RD HMA S G S MONTGOMERY C HMA HMA HMA HMA HMA R R R R VICTORIA DR HMA HMA HMA HMAHMAHMA HMAHMAHMA HMA HMA HMA HMA EX ROW LINEPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL EX ROW EX ROWEX ROWEX ROWEX A/C AND ROW EX A /C AND ROW EX A /C AND ROWONLYONLYONLY ONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLY 1205+00 1210+00 1215+00 405+00 410+00 VPI STA. 1202+00.00ELEVATION 666.72-0.50%+0.52% 160.00' V.C.+20.00 EL. 667.12+80.00 EL. 667.14K = 157 VPI STA. 1208+00.00ELEVATION 669.82+0.52%-0.30% 150.00' V.C. K = 184 SSD = 1398'VPI STA. 1215+80.00ELEVATION 667.48-0.30% -1.30% 150.00' V.C. K = 150 SSD = 1154'+25.00 EL. 669.43+75.00 EL. 669.59+05.00 EL. 667.71668.81668.88669.05669.16669.32669.42669.12669.17669.38669.40669.40669.57669.63669.33669.26669.22669.03668.95668.69668.42668.21667.90667.80667.63667.38667.12666.88666.65666.40666.26665.91667.22667.00666.93667.01667.24667.50667.75668.01668.27668.53668.79669.04669.30669.54669.67669.65669.52669.37669.22669.07668.92668.77668.62668.47668.32668.17668.02667.87667.72667.50667.12 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-15.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 15 OF SHEETS STA.1216+00 TO STA.1231+00 - - - - - - - - Default MATCH LINE STA 1216+00MATCH LINE STA 1231+000 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY 33 PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 16 1216+00 1217+00 1218+00 1219+00 1220+00 1221+00 1222+00 1223+00 1224+00 1225+00 1226+00 1227+00 1228+00 1229+00 1230+00 1231+00 24'15'15'24'24'24'12'PR US RTE 30 PGL US RTE 30 PR PVMT INVESTMENTS LLC 2255 RATH 15-31-451-013 HELEN M MORRIS RONNIE D & 15-31-451-009 KENNETH MOY 15-31-401-007 ERMAN E CLARK15-31-451-003MARIA E SOTO EMMANUEL & 15-31-451-011 KRAJNOVICH & JILL ANN PAULINE PEARL 15-31-451-012 RANDI S BORNE JAY K & 15-31-476-005 BUILDING CORP UAW #145 15-31-401-005 LASALLE TRUST 15-31-401-006 KENNETH MOY 15-31-401-007 LEE KERSHAW15-31-401-008LEE KERSHAW 15-31-401-009 MARCINIAK LEOKADIA RYSZARD & 15-31-451-014 PT Sta 1217+90.92 PR 10' PATH ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 105'70'80'PR A/C AND ROW PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G EX GND LINE +48.8 ~12' +90.7 ~ 12' PR SOD SURF PR 5' SW+91PR SM+918'8'+25+21+90+108'8'6'3'6'3'12'R=3' R=3'9'9'PR 5' SW R=25'R=25'145' 105.00' LT STA 1217+90.92 105.00' LT STA 1220+27.68 105.00' LT STA 1219+12.79 130.00' LT STA 1219+14.04 130.00' LT STA 1220+51.79 80.00' RT STA 1217+34.62 80.00' RT STA 1229+51.28 70.00' LT STA 1229+74.76 85.00' LT STA 1229+80.31 85.00' LT STA 1230+12.29 70.00' LT STA 1230+06.74 TEMP ESMT 80.00' RT STA 1229+64.79 ESMT TEMP TEMP ESMT 105.00' LT STA 1217+71.44 155.00' LT STA 1217+90.92 APARTMENTS LLC VICTORIAN 15-31-401-024 155.00' LT STA 1216+09.33 128.99' LT 1216+00.31 TEMP ESMT 80'LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PATRICIA SLOVE 15-31-476-001 +91+91115' STORAGE 115' STORAGE220' TAPER PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR 8' SHLD 1:50 TAPER 1:50 TAPER PR A/C AND ROW 145.00' RT STA 1229+27.25 145.00' RT STA 1229+40.76140'STORAGE COMPENSATORY STORAGE COMPENSATORY 300' TRANSITION FROM 30' MEDIAN TO 18' MEDIAN (1:50 RATE) R=50'R=40' R=50' R=40' PR SM3'3'3'3'70.00' LT STA 1229+00.00 WETLANDS NOISE WALL B15 +55ACRE TREE REMOVAL 140.00' LT STA 1223+99.09 140.00' LT STA 1228+06.67 105.00' LT STA 1220+51.75 105.00' LT STA 1223+58.64 77.95' RT STA 1218+91.93 145.00' RT STA 1221+04.67 (DETAILS TO BE DONE IN PHASE II) OUTSIDE EOS CURB & GUTTER WILL BE MODIFIED TO PREVENT PONDING DUE TO FLAT VERTICAL PROFILE*CCCCHMA HMA CONC G RR POOL CONCHMAHMAHMA AGG PEAGG PEGPL PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW ONLY 1220+00 1225+00 1230+00 415+00 -1.30%VPI STA. 1219+40.00ELEVATION 662.80-1.30%-0.28% 260.00' V.C. K = 254 VPI STA. 1222+00.00ELEVATION 662.08-0.28%-0.02% 150.00' V.C. K = 595 VPI STA. 1224+00.00ELEVATION 662.03-0.02%+0.02% 200.00' V.C. K = 4000 VPI STA. 1226+00.00ELEVATION 662.08+0.02%+0.14% 150.00' V.C. K = 1332 +55.00 EL. 666.51+10.00 EL. 664.49+70.00 EL. 662.44+25.00 EL. 662.29+75.00 EL. 662.06+00.00 EL. 662.05+00.00 EL. 662.05+25.00 EL. 662.06+75.00 EL. 662.18665.91665.64665.37665.09664.99664.70664.52664.18663.92663.63663.31663.12662.93662.67662.49662.17662.15662.11661.96661.82661.76661.61661.55661.42661.33661.23661.18661.04660.87660.85660.77667.12666.57665.92665.27664.62664.00663.48663.06662.73662.50662.36662.22662.13662.07662.05662.05662.04662.05662.05662.07662.10662.15662.22662.29662.36662.42662.49662.56662.63662.70662.77 635 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 635 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-16.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED SHEET 16 OF 33 SHEETS STA.1231+00 TO STA.1246+00 - - - - - - - - Default MATCH LINE STA 1231+000 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 MATCH LINE STA 1246+00PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 F.A.P. 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 17 1231+00 1232+00 1233+00 1234+00 1235+00 1236+00 1237+00 1238+00 1239+00 1240+00 1241+00 1242+00 1243+00 1244+00 1245+00 1246+00 PR US RTE 30 PGL & FISHING CLUB AURORA HUNTING 15-31-401-010 & FISHING CLUB AURORA HUNTING 15-31-401-011 RANDI S BORNE JAY K & 15-31-476-005 P GIEBEL MICHAEL 15-31-476-006 ZEPEDA JR MIQUEL C 15-31-476-007 BARBARA HOLTMAN 15-31-476-008 TRS, TRUSTEES LLOYD A & DORIS F BOWMAN 15-31-476-014 BETTY J WENDLING 15-32-300-04724'24'12'24'24'& ALICE BROWN RONALD D 15-31-476-009 PR PVMT US RTE 30 PR 10' PATH ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 PC Sta 1238+92.0370'145'EX GND LINE EX SEC LINE PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW PR A/C AND ROW +85.5 ~ 30' 59.83' RT 1244+01.84 78.96' RT 1243+98.27 PR 5' SW 8'8'8'8'9'9'PR SOD SURF6'3'+53+3380'70' 70.00' LT STA 1238+92.03 89.04' RT 1245+00.10 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION P.T. STA. = 1266+33.61 PROP. CURVE US30CUR2 PI STA. = 1253+78.51 R = 2,859.00' T = 1,486.48' L = 2,741.57' E = 363.34' S.E. RUN = 126' P.C. STA. = 1238+92.03 e = 3.6% T.R. = 54' PR 8' SHLD PR 8' SHLD 220' TAPER PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G 80.00' RT STA 1236+84.99 145.00' RT STA 1243+71.46140' LOCATION WATER QUALITY3'3'3'3'WETLANDS NOISE WALL B15 +85140.00' RT STA 1236+63.15 140.00' RT STA 1238+91.92 140.00' RT STA 1242+00.00 145.00' RT STA 1243+00.00 R S RGR POOL POOL S MONTGOMERYAGG P E2" 2"2"PLPL PL PLPLPL PL EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW ONLY 1235+00 1240+00 1245+00 VPI STA. 1232+20.00ELEVATION 662.93+0.14%-0.51% 150.00' V.C. K = 233 SSD = 1749'+45.00 EL. 662.83+95.00 EL. 662.55+95.00 EL. 655.96660.77660.63660.56660.44660.34660.17660.15660.00660.00659.90659.80659.66659.49659.28659.12658.93658.67658.57658.36658.14657.95657.72657.61657.44657.24657.10656.70656.60656.42656.27656.09662.77662.84662.84662.74662.53662.27662.02661.77661.51661.26661.01660.75660.50660.25659.99659.74659.48659.23658.98658.72658.47658.22657.96657.71657.46657.20656.95656.70656.44656.19655.94 635 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 635 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-17.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 17 OF 33 SHEETS STA.1246+00 TO STA.1261+00 - - - - - - - - Default MATCH LI NE STA 1246+000 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30 MATCH LINE STA 1261+00349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 18 1246+00 1247+00 1248+00 1249+00 1250+00 1251+00 1252+00 1253+00 1254+00 1255+00 1256+00 1257+00 1258+00 1259+00 1260+00 1261+00 US RTE 30 PR US RTE 30 PGL24'24'18' DVLP INC H LINDEN & SONS 15-32-351-002 DEVELOPMENT INC H LINDEN & SONS 15-32-300-060 & FISHING CLUBAURORA HUNTING15-31-401-010 BANK AURORAOLD SECOND NATIONAL15-32-300-046 PR 10' PATH70' PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW EX GND LINE PR PVMT ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 70.77' LT 1248+00.00 60.28' LT 1247+53.00 90.68' LT 1250+99.86 90.58' LT 1255+49.87 95.77' RT 1256+46.43 95.00' LT 1256+96.08 89.11' RT 1257+84.34 PR 5' SW 24'35'8'8' PR SOD SURF ~ US RTE 30 STA 1248+86 PROJECT ENDS+7670.00' LT STA 1247+96.68 P.T. STA. = 1266+33.61 PROP. CURVE US30CUR2 PI STA. = 1253+78.51 R = 2,859.00' T = 1,486.48' L = 2,741.57' E = 363.34' S.E. RUN = 126' P.C. STA. = 1238+92.03 e = 3.6% T.R. = 54' PR 8' SHLD PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G 89.19' RT STA 1247+41.77 145.00' RT STA 1247+38.26 PR A/C AND ROW145' LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION BETTY J WENDLING 15-32-300-047 LOCATION WATER QUALITY EX GUARDRAIL EX BIT SHLD EX BIT PVMT EX BIT PVMT EX B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G3'3' WETLANDS C C C HMA HMA HMA HMA C HMA ROCK ROCK ROCK BILLBOARD PL PL PL PL PL PL PL EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX ROWEX ROWEX A/C AND ROWEX A/C AND ROWEX ROWEX ROW 1250+00 1255+00 1 2 6 0 + 0 0 VPI STA. 1246+70.00ELEVATION 655.58-0.51%-0.40% 150.00' V.C. K = 1440 654.75+45.00 EL. 655.28656.09655.79655.66655.42655.27655.07654.66654.47654.28654.09653.90653.71653.52653.33653.14652.95652.76652.57652.38652.19652.00651.81651.62651.43651.32651.45651.81652.40653.22654.27655.45655.94655.69655.47655.26655.06654.85 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-18.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED SHEET 18 OF SHEETS STA.1261+00 TO STA.1276+00 - - - - - - - - Default 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY 33 PLAN AND PROFILE US RTE 30MATCH LINE STA 1261+00F.A.P. 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 19 1261+00 1262+00 1263+00 1264+00 1265+00 1266+00 1267+00 1268+00 1269+00 1270+00 1271+00 1272+00 1273+00 1274+00 1275+00 1276+00 ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 EX GND LINE24'24' WETLANDS MONTGOMERY HMAROCKHMAHMABURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE US RTE 30 ILL 31 LAKE STILL 31 LAKE ST 1265+00 PT Sta 1266+33.60 1270+00 PC Sta 1274+68.85 1275+0012" WM12" WM12" WM12" WM12" WM PL PL PL PL PL PL PL 1265+00 1270+00 1275+00 655.45656.62657.80658.97660.15661.32662.50663.67664.85665.97666.99667.90668.71669.41670.01670.50670.89671.17671.35671.43671.39671.26671.02670.67670.22669.66669.00667.81(667.12)(665.16)(666.19) 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-19.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED SHEET 19 OF SHEETS STA.10+00 TO STA.17+56 - - - - - - - - Default 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY 33 (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD)MATCH LINE STA 1062+50 (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD)MATCH LINE STA 1066+00 PLAN AND PROFILE BERTRAM RD F.A.P. 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 20 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 ~ BERTRAM RD STA 10+00.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1064+32.42 ~ PR BERTRAM RDPR PVMT BERTRAM RD12'12'12'HAMMAN REVOC TRS DONALD J & CAROL S 14-34-300-003 LLC & ET AL GROVE HOLDINGS, M&N SUGAR 14-34-400-004 ALCANTAR ARTURO & LYDIA 14-34-400-002 ~ BERTRAM RD STA 10+00 PROJECT BEGINS ~ BERTRAM RD STA 18+10 PROJECT ENDS PR BERTRAM RD PGL R=300'87°40'35"215' STORAGE 215' STORAGE EX GND LINE PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G 17.70' LT 10+61.59 48.25' RT 10+64.26 35.60'30.40'+8111'11'(BASELINE RD)US RTE 30PR 5' SW ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 R=50' R=50' +83+63180' TAPER 45'PR ROW 45.00' LT STA 13+73.99 EX ROW EX ROW 47.52' RT STA 10+92.00 BLDG REM 68.03' RT STA 10+72.82 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PR A/C AND ROW PR A/C AND ROWPR A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW STRIPED MEDIAN PR 8' SHLD PR 8' SHLD 45.00' LT STA 17+00.00 31.37' LT STA 18+00.00 EX BIT PVMT4'POT Sta 19+00.00PI Sta 13+74.62POT Sta 10+00.00 WATER QUALITY LOCATION 45.00' LT STA 10+83.24 6' R=10' PR CURB TRANSITION PR CURB TRANSITION 1:45 TAPER 1:45 TAPER12'179°12'00" EX 4' AGG SHLD GRHMA PEAGGPLPLONLYONLYONLYONLY 1065+00 10+00 15+00 670.45670.21670.07669.86669.39668.61667.57666.43665.44664.90664.57664.48664.40664.35663.96663.56670.82669.91669.21668.89668.59668.13667.48666.71665.99665.45665.10664.85664.59664.29663.95VPI STA. 10+15.00ELEVATION 670.60-1 .50%-2 .0 0%-2 .00%VPI STA. 10+84.00ELEVATION 669.22-0.50% 90.00' V.C. K = 60 VPI STA. 12+40.00ELEVATION 668.44-0.50% -1 .57% 150.00' V.C. K = 140 SSD = 1081'VPI STA. 14+30.00ELEVATION 665.45-1 .57% -0.50% 150.00' V.C. K = 140 VPI STA. 16+50.00ELEVATION 664.35-0.50%-0.78% 150.00' V.C. K = 527 SSD = 3867'663.61+39.00 EL. 670.12+29.00 EL. 668.99+65.00 EL. 668.81+15.00 EL. 667.26+55.00 EL. 666.63+05.00 EL. 665.07+75.00 EL. 664.72+25.00 EL. 663.76 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-20.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 20 OF SHEETS STA.20+00 TO STA.28+00 - - - - - - - - Default 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY 33 MATCH LINE STA 1066+00 (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) MATCH LINE STA 1077+00 PLAN AND PROFILE DICKSON RD 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 21 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+0021+0020+00 DICKSON RD US RTE 30 (BASELINE RD)~ DICKSON RD STA 29+00.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1075+32.44 PR PVMT ~ PR DICKSON RD 90°34'36"R=300' NORTH STAR TRUST COMPANY FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN CHICAGO 02-03-100-001 LLC & ET. AL. M&N SUGAR GROVE HOLDINGS, 14-34-400-004 HAMMAN DONALD J & CAROL S 02-03-200-007 ~ DICKSON RD STA 20+64 PROJECT BEGINS ~ DICKSON RD STA 29+00 PROJECT ENDS PR DICKSON RD PGL 215' STORAGE 215' STORAGE EX GND LINE PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR M-4.24 COMB CONC C&G PR A/C AND ROW 28.92' LT 27+41.41 31.08' RT 27+40.77 R=50'30.50'29.50'12'12'12'~ EX & PR US RTE 30 +12+32180' TAPER11'11'PR ROW PR ROW45'45'EX ROW EX ROW EX A/C AND ROWEX A/C AND ROWEX A/C AND ROW29.82' LT STA 21+00.00 71.26' LT STA 28+20.71 R=50' PR A/C AND ROW 30.18' RT STA 21+00.00 45.00' RT STA 27+92.74 71.54' RT STA 28+19.28 PR 10' PATH (TYP) PR A/C AND ROW LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION EX BIT PVMT 45.00' LT STA 22+00.00 45.00' RT STA 22+00.00 PR 8' SHLD PR 8' SHLD STRIPED MEDIAN 10' 4'1:45 TAPER 1:45 TAPER 12'PR CURB TRANSITION PR CURB TRANSITION R=10' 45.00' LT STA 26+00.00 EX 4' AGG SHLD 1075+00 20+00 25+00 HMA RONLYONLYONLYONLY662.91VPI STA. 23+00.00ELEVATION 663.76+0.36%-0.70% 150.00' V.C. K = 141 SSD = 1092'VPI STA. 25+00.00ELEVATION 662.36-0.70%+0.74% 150.00' V.C. K = 104 VPI STA. 27+86.00ELEVATION 664.47+0.74%+2.00% 150.00' V.C. K = 119 +2.00%VPI STA. 28+85.00ELEVATION 666.45+1.50%+25.00 EL. 663.49+75.00 EL. 663.23+25.00 EL. 662.88+75.00 EL. 662.91+11.00 EL. 663.92+61.00 EL. 665.97663.13663.33663.37663.31663.29663.20662.97662.93663.05663.13663.64664.16664.56664.96665.96667.42663.00662.87662.74663.04663.22663.40663.56663.56663.39663.06662.74662.63662.76663.10663.47663.84664.27664.91665.76666.67 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-21.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 21 OF SHEETS STA.30+00 TO STA.43+00 - - - - - - - - Default 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 MATCH LINE STA 43+00PRELIMINARY 33 MATCH LINE STA 1099+00 (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) MATCH LINE STA 1103+00 PLAN AND PROFILE GORDON RD 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 22 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 GORDON RD (BASELINE RD)US RTE 30~ PR GORDON RD 90°00'00"R=5' R=150' R=4' ~ GORDON RD STA 40+00.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1100+95.34 R=4' PR B-6.12 CURB AND GUTTER CAROL S HAMMAN DONALD J & 02-03-200-007 SWC 73RD & STONEY GENEVA FARGO LLC & 02-02-101-004 & SWC 73RD & STONEY GENEVA FARGO LLC 02-02-101-00124'24'24'11'24'11'11'24'24'11'11'24'~ GORDON RD STA 33+31 PROJECT BEGINS PR GORDON RD PGL 120' STORAGE300' TAPER 185' TAPER 115' STORAGE 120' STORAGE 215' STORAGE R=60' PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G EX SEC LINE PR A/C AND ROW (TYP) EX GND LINE 2631.32' RT 21+68.69 2630.97' RT 22+34.69 46.39' LT 39+39.31 73.11' RT 39+15.38 99.29' RT 39+39.21 69.85' RT 40+60.19 49.88' RT 40+79.69 70.14' LT 40+58.78 50.12' LT 40+78.77 59.15'60.83'+51+88+03+88+1024'ADAM AVEPR PVMT ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 PR SOD SURF 8'7'8'PR 5' SW PR SM R=70' R=7' 1 6' 1 6' R=60' R=55' R=55' PATH (TYP) PR 10' R=55' R=55' +92R=55' EX ROW EX ROW EX ROW EX ROW 48.80' LT STA 38+30.00 151.10' LT STA 39+20.00 49.90' LT STA 41+12.97 PR SM 215' STORAGE 49.99' RT STA 41+70.52 R=150' 145.00' RT STA 40+76.47 PR A/C AND ROW (TYP) 72.66' RT STA 38+95.00 100.00' RT STA 39+20.00 EX A/C AND ROW LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP) LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP) EX A/C AND ROW 437' TRANSITION FROM 18' MEDIAN TO 30' MEDIAN+51+88R=9' R=50' R=30' 25'10' 28'10' PROP. CURVE GRDNCUR1 PI STA. = 32+72.36 R = 4,000.00' T = 76.79' L = 153.57' E = 0.74' T.R. = N.C. S.E. RUN = N.C. P.C. STA. = 31+95.57 P.T. STA. = 33+49.14 P.C. STA. = 36+53.46 PROP. CURVE GRDNCUR2 PI STA. = 37+14.43 R = 3,000.00' T = 60.97' L = 121.93' E = 0.62' T.R. = N.C. S.E. RUN = N.C. P.T. STA. = 37+75.38 PC Sta 31+95.57PT Sta 33+49.14PC Sta 36+53.46PI Sta 37+14.43PT Sta 37+75.38CONC C&G EX B-6.12 COMB PVMT EX BITPI Sta 32+72.36 e = N.C.e = N.C. PVMT EX BIT EX PATH EX PATH 4'10'MIN5' PARTIALLY SHADOWED APPROACH TAPER (1:73 RATE) R=200' R=200' 93.40' LT STA 40+69.06 VILLAGE OF MONTGOMERY 14-35-354-019 1100+00 30+00 35+00 40+00 TSR RHMA HMA POOLSS HMA MONTGOMERY(ELEC) APT (TEL)PLPLP PL PLPLPLONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLY ONLYONLY665.36VPI STA. 35+50.00ELEVATION 667.72+1.08%VPI STA. 43+00.00120.00' V.C. +3.35% 160.00' V.C. K = 70 VPI STA. 38+40.00ELEVATION 677.43+3.35% +2.00% 120.00' V.C. K = 89 SSD = 859'VPI STA. 40+00.00ELEVATION 680.63+2.00%-2 .00% 180.00' V.C. K = 45 SSD = 360'VPI STA. 41+50.00ELEVATION 677.63-2 .00% -0.70% 120.00' V.C. K = 92 -0.70%+70.00 EL. 666.85+30.00 EL. 670.40+80.00 EL. 675.42+00.00 EL. 678.63+10.00 EL. 678.83+90.00 EL. 678.83+90.00 EL. 678.83+10.00 EL. 677.21+40.00 EL. 677.00K = 64 SSD = 633'664.83665.16665.48666.18666.79668.05669.04669.66670.62671.60672.76673.87675.10676.59677.90678.75678.03677.46677.17676.89676.66676.24665.56666.10666.64667.24668.17669.45671.07672.74674.42676.07677.49678.63679.45679.73679.45678.64677.83677.29676.92676.30 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-22.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 22 OF SHEETS STA.43+00 TO STA.48+41 - - - - - - - - Default 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100MATCH LINE STA 43+00PRELIMINARY 33 PLAN AND PROFILE GORDON RD 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 23 43+00 44+00 45+00 46+00 47+00 GORDON RD24'24'PR PVMT ~ GORDON RD STA 46+09 PROJECT ENDS PR GORDON RD PGL PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G EX GND LINE 50.63'49.37'CAMBRIDGE LN SIMPSON PKWY300' TAPER ~ PR GORDON RD PR SOD SURF24'11'11'24'8'+09EX ROW EX ROW LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION 300' TRANSITION FROM 18' MEDIAN TO 30' MEDIAN+09+09PVMT EX BIT PVMT EX BIT CONC C&G EX B-6.12 COMB PARTIALLY SHADOWED APPROACH TAPER (1:50 RATE)24'24'18'EX 5' SW EX 10' PATH 45+00 50+00HMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMA HMA POOL R R R R R R (ELEC)ONLYONLYELEVATION 676.58-2 .58% 120.00' V.C.667.93+60.00 EL. 675.03K = 64 SSD = 633'676.24675.11673.85672.51671.18670.04668.79667.54666.20676.30675.28674.00672.71671.42670.12668.83 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-23.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED SHEET 23 OF SHEETS STA.50+00 TO STA.57+50 - - - - - - - - Default 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY 33 MATCH LINE STA 1115+50 (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) MATCH LINE STA 1119+50 PLAN AND PROFILE PRESCOTT DR F.A.P. 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 24 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 ~ PRESCOTT DR STA 57+50.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1117+72.70 90°00'00"US RTE 30 (BASELINE RD) ~ PRESCOTT DR STA 55+50 PROJECT BEGINS ~ PRESCOTT DR STA 57+50 PROJECT ENDS EX GND LINE PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G19'19'20'PRESCOTT DR 18'~ PR PRESCOTT DR ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 PR PRESCOTT DR PGL PR SOD SURF R=4.5' R=35'+86+93R=4.5' R=55' R=60' AND ROW (TYP) PR A/C R=55' R=60' PATH (TYP) PR 10' R=45' R=70' 30.74' LT STA 56+17.64 70.00' LT STA 56+75.00 35.19' RT STA 56+17.64 70.00' RT STA 56+80.00 EX ROW EX ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PR PVMT 4'9'PR 5' SW EX 5' SW EX 5' SW EX B-6.12 C&G EX B IT PVM T PROP. CURVE PRSCTCUR1 PI STA. = 52+85.90 R = 235.00' T = 30.39' L = 60.45' E = 1.96' T.R. = N.C. S.E. RUN = N.C. P.C. STA. = 52+55.51 P.T. STA. = 53+15.96 PROP. CURVE PRSCTCUR2 PI STA. = 54+35.99 R = 235.00' T = 30.43' L = 60.52' E = 1.96' T.R. = N.C. S.E. RUN = N.C. P.C. STA. = 54+05.56 P.T. STA. = 54+66.08 e = N.C.e = N.C.PC Sta 52+55.51PI Sta 52+85.90PT Sta 53+15.96PC Sta 54+05.56PI Sta 54+35.99PT Sta 54+66.0810' 1:14 TAPER 1:14 TAPER R=10' R=10' R=20'14'14'HMA HMA HMA HMA HMAHMA HMA HMA HMA HMAHMAHMA HMA HMAHMAHMA HMA HMA HMA SHMA HMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMA HMAHMASPOOLR R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R RPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLP LPLPLPLPLL PLPL 50+00 55+00 668.27VPI STA. 56+25.00ELEVATION 671.12+3.80% +2.00% 120.00' V.C. K = 67 SSD = 658'VPI STA. 57+15.00ELEVATION 672.92+2.00%+2.00%VPI STA. 57+39.00ELEVATION 673.40+2.00%+1.50%673.56+65.00 EL. 668.84+85.00 EL. 672.32663.35663.48663.80664.09663.77663.62663.77664.45665.44666.29667.12668.27670.70672.24673.23673.82668.27670.08671.53672.62673.56 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-24.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 24 OF SHEETS STA.60+00 TO STA.67+50 - - - - - - - - Default PRELIMINARY 33 MATCH LINE STA 1142+00 (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) MATCH LINE STA 1146+00 PLAN AND PROFILE LAKEWOOD CREEK DR 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 25 60+00 61+00 62+00 63+00 64+00 65+00 66+00 67+00 ~ LAKEWOOD CREEK DR STA 67+50.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1144+07.4190°00'00"R=11' ~ PR LAKEWOOD CREEK DR PR PVMT CREEK DR ~ LAKEWOOD STA 65+50 PROJECT BEGINS CREEK DR ~ LAKEWOOD STA 67+50 PROJECT BEGINS ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 EX GND LINE PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G EX SEC LINE LAKEWOOD CREEK DR +7872'12'12'23'US RTE 30 (BASELINE RD)PR LAKEWOOD CREEK DR PGL PR SOD SURF R=50' R=50' PR 10' PATH (TYP)PR A/C AND ROW (TYP)R=50' R=50' R=55' R=60' 81.29' LT STA 66+19.98 38.58' RT STA 66+39.98 EX ROW EX ROW EX A/C AND ROWEX A/C AND ROWEX A/C AND ROW LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION EX 10' PATH EX 5' SW EX B-6.12 C&G EX B-6.12 C&G EX BIT PVMT EX BIT PVMT PR 10' PATH PR 5' SW 11'19'4' R=9.5' 10' 108.83' LT STA 66+70.03 57.32' RT STA 66+74.99 WATER QUALITY LOCATION 18'18'24'24'36'1:19 TAPER 1:21 TAPER R=10' 1145+00 60+00 65+00 WPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL PLPLONLYONLYONLYVPI STA. 65+95.00ELEVATION 664.42+1.25%+2.00% 90.00' V.C. K = 120 +2.00%VPI STA. 67+39.00ELEVATION 667.30+1.50%+50.00 EL. 663.86+40.00 EL. 665.32663.55663.82663.62663.32663.29663.65663.82664.08663.92663.71663.61663.86664.38664.91666.05666.99663.86664.59665.52666.52667.46 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-25.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 25 OF SHEETS STA.77+50 TO STA.82+00 - - - - - - - - Default 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY 33 MATCH LINE STA 1166+50 (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) MATCH LINE STA 1170+00 PLAN AND PROFILE GRIFFIN DR 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 26 73+00 74+00 75+00 76+00 77+00 78+00 79+00 80+00 81+00 82+00 83+00 84+00 85+00 ~ GRIFFIN DR STA 80+00.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1168+38.83 KATE DRKATE DR90°00'00"12'12'12'24'12'12'12'12'12'PR B-6.12 CURB AND GUTTER PR PVMTUS RTE 30(BASELINE RD)GRIFFIN DR ~ GRIFFIN DR STA 77+50 PROJECT BEGINS ~ GRIFFIN DR STA 83+42 PROJECT ENDS ~ PR GRIFFIN DR EX GND LINE 24'PR GRIFFIN DR PGL PR A/C AND ROW (TYP) PR 5' SW R=3' PR B-6.24 CURB AND GUTTER PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G PR B-6.24 CURB AND GUTTER PR PVMT R=4'+30+70R=55' R=50' R=50' R=50' R=55' 62.14' LT STA 78+69.16 EX ROW 57.88' RT STA 78+60.01 79.15' RT STA 79+19.45 PR 10' PATH (TYP) EX ROW EX ROW EX ROW LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP) LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP)EX A/C AND ROWEX A/C AND ROWEX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW 102.49' LT STA 80+70.71 57.08' LT STA 80+90.04 62.97' RT STA 80+88.90 107.56' RT STA 80+74.25 ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 EX BIT PVMT EX BIT PVMT EX 5' SW EX 10' PATH EX B-6.12 C&G 1:10 TAPER 185' STORAGE 185' STORAGE R=55' 8'2'PR 5' SW PI STA. = 83+12.30 PROP. CURVE GRFFNCUR1 R = 460.00' T = 146.67' L = 283.97' E = 22.82' P.C. STA. = 81+65.62 P.T. STA. = 84+49.60 e = N.C. T.R. = N.C. S.E. RUN = N.C.PT Sta 84+49.60PI Sta 83+12.30PC Sta 81+65.62165' STORAGE 165' STORAGE 4' 10' 95 ' TAPER 4' 10' 82.50' LT STA 79+25.57 1:8.5 TAPER20'24'R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=25' 3'6'95 ' TAPER EX BIT PVMT R=9'G&C CNOC BMOC 21.6-B XEWETLANDS R=25' 1170+00 70+00 75+00 80+00HMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMAHMA TSCIVIC CENTER AVE KATE DR R R R R R HMAHMAHMAHMAS SIREN R R R R R R R PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLONLYONLY ONLYONLY663.34VPI STA. 78+20.00ELEVATION 663.47+0.19%+2.00% 120.00' V.C. K = 66 VPI STA. 80+00.00ELEVATION 667.07+2.00%-2 .00% 120.00' V.C. K = 30 SSD = 330'VPI STA. 81+50.00ELEVATION 664.07-2 .00%+1.49% 170.00' V.C. K = 49 666.78+60.00 EL. 663.35+80.00 EL. 664.67+40.00 EL. 665.87+60.00 EL. 665.87+65.00 EL. 665.77+35.00 EL. 665.34662.65662.45662.27662.20662.66663.10663.44663.76663.53663.35663.34663.63664.00664.38665.23666.43665.66665.15664.78665.03665.75666.41666.97667.17667.30667.42663.34663.55664.14665.07666.05666.47666.05665.19664.81664.94665.56666.31 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-26.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 26 OF SHEETS STA.90+00 TO STA.92+32 - - - - - - - - Default PRELIMINARY 33 MATCH LINE STA 1185+50 (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) MATCH LINE STA 1189+00 PLAN AND PROFILE BLACKBERRY RD 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 27 90+00 91+00 92+00 93+00 94+00 95+00 96+00 BLACKBERRY RD ~ BLACKBERRY RD STA 90+00 PROJECT BEGINS ~ BLACKBERRY RD STA 92+32 PROJECT ENDS~ BLACKBERRY RD STA 90+00.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1187+21.36 11'11'PR PVMT ~ PR BLACKBERRY RD ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 EX GND LINE PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G 22' +69.1 ~US RTE 30(BASELINE RD)PR BLACKBERRY RD PGL PR 10' PATH (TYP) R=40' 34.36' RT STA 91+04.60 PR A/C AND ROW (TYP) EX A/C AND ROWEX A/C AND ROWEX A/C AND ROWEX ROW EX ROW LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF R=60' R=300' PROP. CURVE BLKBRYCUR1 PI STA. = 93+26.46 R = 650.00' T = 94.31' L = 187.32' E = 6.81' T.R. = N.C. S.E. RUN = N.C. P.C. STA. = 92+32.15 P.T. STA. = 94+19.47PI St a 93+26.46PT St a 94+19.47PC Sta 92+32.15EX BIT PVMT 4' 10' e = N.C. 54.14' RT STA 90+84.36 31.90' LT STA 90+80.39 LOCATION QUALITY WATER 11'11' 90+00 95+00 BLUEGRASS DR CONCCONCCONCROCK BIT BIT PER R R R R R R R RR S PEBITPE CONC PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLVPI STA. 90+11.00ELEVATION 665.66-1 .50%-2 .00%VPI STA. 91+15.00ELEVATION 663.58-2 .00%+0.38% 160.00' V.C. K = 67 664.02+35.00 EL. 665.18+95.00 EL. 663.89666.34665.32664.40663.90663.90664.10664.22664.36664.43664.64664.79664.86665.07665.46665.83664.90664.19663.87663.91 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-27.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 27 OF SHEETS STA.100+00 TO STA.114+00 - - - - - - - - Default MATCH LINE STA 114+000 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY 33 PLAN AND PROFILE ORCHARD RD 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 28 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00 105+00 106+00 107+00 108+00 109+00 110+00 111+00 112+00 113+00 114+00 ~ ORCHARD RD STA 102+47 PROJECT BEGINS 24'12'12'PR CONC MED SURF, 4" PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G 300' TAPERORCHARD RD 200' TAPER 220' STORAGE 200' TAPER WAL-MART STORES INC 02-01-200-027 MART PROPERTIES LLC 02-01-200-023 MART PROPERTIES LLC 02-01-200-028 EX GND LINE PR ORCHARD RD PGL C/O J MARINO 930 N RUSH STREET LLC, 02-01-204-014 CREEK LLC MILCO-BLACKBERRY 02-01-204-015 PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G ~ ORCHARD RD STA 102+47 PROJECT BEGINS 160' STORAGE 220' STORAGE CATERPILLER DR+85+81~ PR ORCHARD RD PR PVMT 267' STORAGE 36'36'12'11'11'8'29'+47+01+35140' STORAGE12'12'100' TAPER +8568.84' RT 102+96.24 118.21' RT 102+47.39 120.16' LT 102+24.56 69.56' LT 102+77.67 +81+87+03+03+71+5994.68' RT STA 112+00.00 105.00' RT STA 112+00.00 105.00' RT STA 106+46.48 115.00' LT STA 106+77.10 68.59' LT STA 106+77.10 R=40'R=40' PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G EX ROW R=55' R=60' R=40' R=100' 115.00' LT STA 107+47.10 TEMP ESMT TEMP ESMT R=40' 105.00' RT STA 108+05.22 125.00' RT STA 108+05.22 125.00' RT STA 108+85.22 105.00' RT STA 108+85.22 PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G (TYP) R=40' R=40' R=40' PR ROW 110.00' LT STA 112+70.08 TEMP ESMT R=40' 95.00' RT STA 112+89.00 145.00' RT STA 112+89.00 95.00' RT STA 113+69.00 145.00' RT STA 113+69.00 ESMT TEMP LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION EX ROW PI Sta 112+19.17PI Sta 106+46.18PT Sta 102+45.87PI Sta 101+23.45PROP. CURVE PRORCHCUR1 PI STA. = 101+23.45 R = 1,100.00' T = 123.45' L = 245.87' E = 6.91' e = 3.7% T.R. = 46' S.E. RUN = 123' P.C. STA. = 100+00.00 P.T. STA. = 102+45.87PC Sta 100+00.00R=40' PR 5' SW 4' 6'4'4'6'4'4'6'EX BIT PVMT EX B IT SHLD CONC C&GEX B-6.12 COMB300' TRANSITION FROM 18' MEDIAN TO 30' MEDIAN+85+85PARTIALLY SHADOWED APPROACH TAPER (1:50 RATE)+35(1:50 RATE) MEDIAN TO 18' MEDIAN 150' TRANSITION FROM 12'3'6'6'66.44' LT STA 112+70.08 66.15' LT STA 113+35.00 110.00' LT STA 113+35.00 TEMP ESMT 77.06' LT STA 107+47.10 PNJ INVESTMENTS 02-01-204-013 FULLER GROUP SEVEN LLC 02-01-204-018 FULLER GROUP SEVEN LLC 02-01-204-017 1 0 0 + 0 0 105+00 110+00 CONC 4" 4"4" TPED 4" TPEDFH WV TPED 6"6" 4" 4"6"4"4"4"4"5"5" 5"4"4"4"4"4"4"4"4"4" 4"4"4" 4"4"4" 4"4"4"4" 4" 4"4" 4"4" 4" TS TEL GV FH 6" 6"6" 6"6" 6" 6"6" 6" 4" TPED PLPLONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLY667.31VPI STA. 106+10.00ELEVATION 668.40+0.30%-0.60% 140.00' V.C. K = 156 SSD = 1275'VPI STA. 113+00.00ELEVATION 664.29-0.60%+0.76% 140.00' V.C. K = 104 +40.00 EL. 668.19+80.00 EL. 667.98+30.00 EL. 664.71+70.00 EL. 664.82667.32667.47667.62667.77667.92668.07668.21668.25668.13667.86667.56667.27666.97666.67666.37666.08665.78665.48665.18664.88664.61664.53664.69665.04666.92666.97667.00667.32667.25667.31667.36667.35667.46667.32667.18667.00667.33667.09666.99666.83666.60666.40665.96665.48665.30665.14664.99664.81664.69664.54664.54664.69664.92 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-28.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 28 OF SHEETS 114+00 TO STA.129+00 - - - - - - - - Default MATCH LINE STA 114+00MATCH LINE STA 129+000 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY 33 MATCH LINE STA 1195+50 (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) MATCH LINE STA 1199+00 STA. PLAN AND PROFILE ORCHARD RD 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 29 114+00 115+00 116+00 117+00 118+00 119+00 120+00 121+00 122+00 123+00 124+00 125+00 126+00 127+00 128+00 129+00 ~ ORCHARD RD STA 117+00.00 ~ US RTE 30 STA 1197+13.69 YORKVILLE LLC MCVICKERS 02-01-204-001 ORCHARD RD LLC ARC FTMTGIL001 02-01-200-018 90°37'14"ORCHARD RD CONC C&G PR B-6.24 COMB 350' STORAGE 350' STORAGE BRENTWOOD AVEBRADLEY DR 199.99' LT 124+19.87 300' TAPER 375' STORAGE 200' TAPER R=30'R=30' PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G (TYP) PR CONC MED SURF, 4" PR ORCHARD RD PGLEX GND LINE PR PVMT TRUSTEE BK OF AURORA, OLD SECOND NATL 15-31-378-028 A B C D E F A MARTA DURON 15-31-378-001 B CLARISSA GRAVELLY HARRY GAYTAN, 15-31-351-016 C SANDOVAL SOLEDAD & LAURO 15-31-351-015 D MATTHEW HODGETTS 15-31-351-014 E ROBERT WEBB 15-31-351-013 F BRANDON CARLSON 15-31-351-012MOSHERWILLIAM & SARAH15-31-351-011TINA RUIZ15-31-351-010WHITINGTIMOTHY & JINNELLE15-31-351-009GARY GOROBEGKO15-31-351-008LIVING TRUSTSSHARON & LARRY STOUT,15-31-351-007OLEGARIO VILLALPANDO15-31-351-006+92+81+8430US RTE~ PR ORCHARD RD 36'36'11'11'11'12'36'36'8'8'12'RD)(BASELINER=4'+8PR 10' PATH PR 10' PATH (TYP)R=150' R=150' R=150' R=150' 11'R=55' 16'R=40' 1 6'16'1 6' R=40' R=40' (TYP) R=90' R=4'(TYP)10'R=55' R=55' R=50'18' 100.22' LT 116+28.69 55.07' LT 115+74.87 84.83' RT 115+83.24 137.18' RT 116+31.56 50.00' RT 119+23.34 65.00' RT 119+23.34 65.00' RT 120+52.72 65.00' RT 121+19.69 +81EX ROW LINE EX ROW LINE (TYP) EX ROW LINE 95.00' RT STA 115+69.38 140.14' RT STA 116+11.56 R=55' PR ROW PR ROW 70.00' RT STA 120+53.58 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP) LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP)+44+44EX 10' PATH 7'220' STORAGE 220' STORAGE 7'PR 5' SW 300' TRANSITION FROM 18' MEDIAN TO 30' MEDIAN+44+44STORAGE COMPENSATORY 220' STORAGE PARTIALLY SHADOWED APPROACH TAPER (1:50 RATE)3'134.70' RT STA 117+76.50 120.49' RT STA 117+76.31 R=55' R=10' 70.00' RT STA 118+25.00 70.00' RT STA 118+38.89ESMTTEMP WETLANDS NOISE WALL B16 +24+54+20R=40' 96.72' LT STA 115+88.95 55.21' LT STA 115+44.48 R=30' R=60' 65.16' LT STA 115+55.14 EX ROW TSR R G G G G R R G R G R G POOL POOL MONTGOMERY C PLPLPLPLPLONLYONLYONLYONLYONLY ONLY ONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLY 115+00 120+00 125+00 VPI STA. 115+00.00ELEVATION 665.80+0.76%+2.00% 140.00' V.C. K = 113 VPI STA. 117+00.00ELEVATION 669.80+2.00%-2 .00% 250.00' V.C. K = 63 SSD = 395'VPI STA. 119+50.00ELEVATION 664.80-2 .00%+0.31% 200.00' V.C. K = 87 +30.00 EL. 665.27+70.00 EL. 667.20+75.00 EL. 667.30+25.00 EL. 667.30+50.00 EL. 666.80+50.00 EL. 665.11+0.31%665.04665.44666.02666.82667.75668.35668.55668.35667.75666.80665.94665.38665.10665.11665.26665.42665.57665.73665.88666.03666.19666.34666.50666.65666.81666.96667.11667.27667.42667.58667.73664.92665.34665.88666.35666.79667.05667.89667.13666.65666.39666.16665.95665.80665.71665.91665.50666.12666.16666.25666.27666.45666.58666.77666.79666.78666.95667.12667.28667.45667.62667.75 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-29.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 29 OF SHEETS STA.129+00 TO STA.144+00 - - - - - - - - Default MATCH LINE STA 129+000 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY 33 PLAN AND PROFILE ORCHARD RD 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 30 129+00 130+00 131+00 132+00 133+00 134+00 135+00 136+00 137+00 138+00 139+00 140+00 141+00 142+00 143+00 144+00 PR PVMT 200' STORAGE 200' TAPER PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G (TYP) EX GND LINE PR ORCHARD RD PGL ORCHARD RD 36'36'18'12'36'36'+13+95PR CONC MED SURF, 4"BETSINGERCHARLES & JANEL15-31-351-005GASIOR FITZPATRICKTHOMAS & SUSAN15-31-351-004FLORESOSCAR & ELIZABETH15-31-351-003ANN DILLERRAYMOND & KATHLEEN15-31-351-002BARBARA WILLIAMS15-31-351-017JANELLE RODRIGUEZ 15-31-327-015 ANGELL REALTY VII LLC 15-31-326-032 DONALD & CAROL HAMMAN 14-36-479-018 COUNTYSIDE DR+15+00~ PR ORCHARD RD R=50'+17+1724'24'18'12'12'~ ORCHARD RD STA 143+17 PROJECT ENDS 64.60' RT 132+17.57 84.55' RT 132+37.49 84.38' RT 133+03.49 64.33' RT 133+23.57 64.08' RT 134+23.57 375' STORAGE+21+41+17+15EX ROW LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION 200' TAPER EX ROW EX BIT PVMT EX BIT PVMT EX BIT PVMT EX BIT PVMT EX B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G WETLANDS NOISE WALL B16 +37+03+50+1012'6'3'6' WOOD 18" TPED 6" 6" 8" WVFH 12" 12" 15" 10" 9" 8"8"8" TS TS 10" 18" 12" FH WV 12"BUSH ROW15" 15" 6" FH WV GV TS TS BIT CONC TS TS FH WV6" BBOXBBOX W W CONC CONC BIT W 2' WOOD W BIT CEROW B-6.24 C&G B-6.24 C&G B-6.24 C&G B-6.24 C&G W 6"STEEL BIT BIKE PATH ONLYONLYONLY 130+00 135+00 140+00 667.93+0.31%667.73667.88667.75667.89668.02668.14668.27668.38668.55668.67669.02669.07669.04669.03668.84668.58668.72668.52668.30668.01667.80667.37667.14666.95666.84665.98666.38666.05665.83665.74665.25664.80664.67 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-30.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 30 OF 33 SHEETS STA.200+00 TO STA.207+50 - - - - - - - - Default 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) MATCH LINE STA 1206+50 (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) MATCH LINE STA 1210+00 PLAN AND PROFILE HORSEMAN TRAIL 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 31 200+00 201+00 202+00 203+00 204+00 205+00 206+00 207+00 HORSEMAN TRAIL KEVIN DR 24'R=45' R=45' R=300' ~ HORSEMAN TRAIL STA 205+00 PROJECT BEGINS PR PVMT PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G CREDIT UNION AURORA EARTHMOVER 03-06-100-003 STORES INC WAL-MART 02-01-200-022 TRUST, TRUSTEE OXFORD BANK & 15-31-379-004 30.34' LT 205+96.15 31.48' RT 206+29.00 EX GND LINE OAKTON DREX SECTION LINE ~ US RTE 30 STA 1208+22.61 ~ HORSEMAN TRAIL STA 207+50.00 ~ EX & PR HORSEMAN TRAIL ~ EX & PR US RTE 30 TRAIL PGL PR HORSEMAN (BASELI NE RD)US RTE 3012'12'+28+29+76EX ROW EX ROW EX A/C AND ROWEX A/C AND ROWEX ROW EX ROWLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF 100' TAPER STRIPED MEDIAN 7' 10'EX BIT PVMTEX BIT PVMT EX BIT PVMT EX SW EX B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G EX B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G 12'R=10' 1210+00 200+00 205+00 405+00RSRHMA HMA HMA HMA KEVIN DR BRENTWOOD AVE MULLBERRY DR HMA POOLMONTGOMERY HMAHMA(TEL)SANSR R R R R G G S R R CONC R R RPLPLPLPLPLPLPLONLYONLYONLY 669.27VPI STA. 205+85.00ELEVATION 668.95-0.37%+1.00% 120.00' V.C. K = 87 VPI STA. 207+10.49ELEVATION 670.21+1.00%-2 .18%VPI STA. 207+34.80ELEVATION 669.68-1 .41%669.46+25.00 EL. 669.18+45.00 EL. 669.55665.14665.33665.69666.15666.80667.36667.90668.42668.84669.10669.27669.01668.51668.55668.46669.30669.27669.12669.22669.60670.10669.46 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-31.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 31 OF 33 SHEETS STA.302+95 TO STA.304+42 - - - - - - - - Default (US RTE 30) MATCH LINE STA 1214+50 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY (US RTE 30 BASELINE RD) MATCH LINE STA 1210+50 PLAN AND PROFILE OLD BASELINE RD 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 32 300+00 301+00 302+00 303+00 304+00 US RTE 30OLD BASELINE RDBRENTWOOD AVEVICTORIA DRD R ENILESAB OAKTON DR16'16'~ OLD BASELINE RD STA 302+95 PROJECT BEGINS R=45' PR B-6.24 COMB CONC C&G EX GND LINE ~ US RTE 30 STA 1212+27.55 ~ OLD BASELINE RD STA 304+41.53 ~ EX & PR US RTE 30~ EX & PR OLD BASELINE RD ~ OLD BASELINE RD STA 302+95 PROJECT BEGINSPR A/C AND ROWPR OLD BASELINE RD PGL E X R OW L IN E E X R OW L IN E R=110'EX ROWEX ROWEX A/C AND ROWR=40' PR PVMT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION 49.40' RT STA 303+60.09 4' 10'PT Sta 302+95.23 PI Sta 302+76.38 PC Sta 302+49.94 PC Sta 300+99.14 PT Sta 301+42.15 PI Sta 301+22.08 PROP. CURVE OLDBSLNECUR1 PI STA. = 301+22.08 R = 50.00' T = 22.94' L = 43.01' E = 5.01' T.R. = N.C. S.E. RUN = N.C. P.C. STA. = 300+99.14 P.T. STA. = 301+42.15 PROP. CURVE OLDBSLNECUR2 PI STA. = 302+76.38 R = 35.00' T = 26.44' L = 45.29' E = 8.87' T.R. = N.C. S.E. RUN = N.C. P.C. STA. = 302+49.94 P.T. STA. = 302+95.23 e = N.C. e = N.C. R=10' R=10'EX BIT PVMT 300+00 410+00HMA HMAHMAHMAHMABASELINE RD HMA HMA HMA VICTORIA DR C HMA HMA S HMA HMA HMA HMA R R R R R R R R R R R POOL CPLPL PLPLPLPLPLPLONLYONLY 667.62VPI STA. 304+02.53ELEVATION 669.05+1.33%-2 .2 0%667.62668.52666.83666.79667.56667.65668.08668.16667.56666.79667.48667.69668.35669.02 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-32.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED F.A.P. SHEET 32 OF 33 SHEETS STA.400+00 TO STA.414+00 - - - - - - - - Default 0 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 PRELIMINARY(HORSEMAN TRA IL )MATCH L INE STA 206+50 (US RTE 30)MATCH LINE STA 1215+17&(OAKTON DR)MATCH LINE STA 413+50(OLD BASELINE RD)MATCH LINE STA 303+50(US RTE 30 BASELINE RD)MATCH LINE STA 1201+00PLAN AND PROFILE OAKTON RD 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 33 400+00 401+00 402+00 403+00 404+00 405+00 406+00 407+00 408+00 409+00 410+00 411+00 412+00 413+00 414+00 12'12'+70.4 ~ +21.1 ~ +77.5 ~ 11'22'22' +34.2 ~ 22'22' +90.5 ~ +46.9 ~ 22' +97.4 ~ 12' +54.6 ~ +39.7 ~ 22'22' +25.0 ~+97.5 ~ +11.9 ~ 20'22'20'12'12' OAKTON RD US RTE 30KEVIN DR~ PR OAKTON RD PR PVMT PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G R=30' R=30' TRUST, TRUSTEE OXFORD BANK & 15-31-379-004 GROUP LLC WILLIAMS 15-31-379-008 GROUP LLC WILLIAMS 15-31-379-009 GROUP LLC WILLIAMS 15-31-379-010 MIGLIORNI BARBARA R RAYMOND J & 15-31-379-011 MIGLIORINI BRIAN J 15-31-379-012 41.60' LT 405+25.96 KANE COUNTY 15-31-378-014 KANE COUNTY 15-31-378-016 EX GND LINE PR OAKTON RD PGL+50+34~ OAKTON RD STA 404+50 PROJECT BEGINS PR A /C AND ROW PR A/C AND ROW EX A /C AND ROW LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PR 5' SW PROP. CURVE OAKTONCUR2 PI STA. = 408+29.60 R = 5,550.00' T = 800.50' L = 1,590.03' E = 57.43' T.R. = N.C. S.E. RUN = N.C. P.C. STA. = 400+29.10 P.T. STA. = 416+19.13 e = N.C.PI Sta 408+29.6037.60' LT 403+69.33 40.44' LT 404+59.48LOCATION DETENTION PVMTEX BITEX B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G3'3' ESTATE LLC RHOADES REAL 15-31-378-018 1205+00 1210+00 1215+00 405+00 410+00 HMA HMA R R R R R HMA OAKTON RD HMA MONTGOMERY HMA HMA R R R HMA HMAHMAHMAHMA HMAHMA HMA HMA HMA HMA PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL EX ROW EX ROWEX ROWEX ROWEX A/C AND ROW ONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLYONLY668.57VPI STA. 405+00.00ELEVATION 668.77+0.40%-0.30% 100.00' V.C. K = 143 VPI STA. 410+00.00ELEVATION 667.27-0.30%-0.52% 100.00' V.C. K = 455+50.00 EL. 668.57+50.00 EL. 668.62+50.00 EL. 667.42+50.00 EL. 667.01SSD = 1591' SSD = 4955'665.85666.63667.09667.49667.78668.03668.46668.60668.28668.50668.45668.17667.90667.74667.43667.29667.17666.91666.40666.72666.75666.93666.61666.30666.11665.92665.71665.43665.19668.57668.69668.62668.47668.32668.17668.02667.87667.72667.57667.42667.25667.01666.75666.49666.23665.97665.71665.45665.19 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 640 645 650 655 660 665 670 675 680 (US RTE 30)MATCH LINE STA 1215+17&(OAKTON DR)MATCH LINE STA 413+50(US RTE 30)MATCH LINE STA 1229+500 50 SCALE IN FEET 100 SURVEYEDPLOTTEDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO.PLANALIGNMENT CHECKEDRT. OF WAY CHECKEDCADD FILE NAMEPROFILESURVEYEDPLOTTEDGRADES CHECKEDB.M. NOTEDSTRUCTURE NOTAT'NS CH'KDBYDATENOTE BOOKNO. SECTION COUNTY ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECT TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. CONTRACT NO. SCALE: 1"=50' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS FILE NAME bdecraene=USER NAME 100.0000 ' / in.=PLOT SCALE 6/16/2017=PLOT DATE V:\3171\CADD Sheets\P140311-sht-plnprf-33.dgn =DESIGNED REVISED REVISED REVISED REVISEDDATE DRAWN CHECKED SHEET 33 OF 33 SHEETS STA.413+50 TO STA.418+56 - - - - - - - - Default PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE OAKTON RD F.A.P. 349 KENDALL KANE/ 34 34 414+00 415+00 416+00 417+00 418+00 419+00 ~ PR OAKTON RD PR B-6.12 COMB CONC C&G PR PVMT 12'12'12'12'26'43.98' LT 414+31.40 20'+89.9 ~ 20' MIGLIORINI BRIAN JOHN 15-31-379-013 BUILDING CORP UAW #145 15-31-401-005 OAKTON RD LASALLE TRUST 15-31-401-006 US RTE 30 EX GND LINE PR OAKTON RD PGL R=15' R=10' R=20' ~ OAKTON RD STA 418+69 PROJECT ENDS PR A/C AND ROW PR 5' SW APARTMENTS LLC VICTORIAN 15-31-401-024 VICTORIADR70.00' LT STA 414+40.28 20.00' LT STA 415+99.94 70.00' LT STA 416+19.13 20.00' LT STA 417+41.00 45.00' LT STA 417+42.25 45.00' LT STA 418+60.00 TEMP ESMT TEMP ESMT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION PR 5' SW 18.26' LT STA 418+60.00 STORAGE COMPENSATORY STORAGE COMPENSATORY 3'3'WETLANDS CHMA HMA CONC RCONCHMA R HMAHMAAGG PEHMA PLPLPLPLPLPLEX A/C AND ROW EX A/C AND ROW ONLY 1215+00 1220+00 1225+00 415+00 662.75-0.52% 1:7 665.43665.19665.02664.85664.60664.15663.89663.65663.34662.47661.15658.23665.45665.19664.93664.67664.41664.15663.89663.63663.37663.11662.85658.23 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #8 Tracking Number PW 2017-71 Intersections – Sign Control Public Works Committee – October 17, 2017 Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department As requested, we investigated the possible installation of stop signs at all of the intersections located within Sunflower Estates (Walsh Drive and Walsh Circle – 2 locations, Walsh Circle and Aster Drive – 2 locations, Walsh Circle and Columbine Drive/Court, Walsh Drive and Columbine Court, Walsh Drive and Sunflower Court). Our findings were as follows:  Currently there is only signage control at one of the intersections, the southern Walsh Drive and Walsh Circle intersection. Only the northbound approach of Walsh Drive and Walsh Circle has a stop sign.  Only the southern intersection of Walsh Drive and Walsh Circle has sight distance constraints (due to the bushes and trees in the median on Walsh Drive), which appear to be rectified by the stop sign on the northbound approach.  The governing entity on traffic control signage is the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The manual states as follows in regards to stop sign installation: Guidance: Engineering judgment should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors should be considered: A. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches; B. Number and angle of approaches; C. Approach speeds; D. Sight distance available on each approach; and E. Reported crash experience. YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist: A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law; B. A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or C. An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist: A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day; B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and/or Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: September 25, 2017 Subject: Sunflower Estates Stop Signs C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of- way at the intersection under the normal right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Yield or Stop signs should not be used for speed control. Since the traffic volumes would appear to be below 2,000 units per day, there are no sight distance constraints on most of the intersections, and there does not appear to be an accident history, these intersections do not appear to be a good candidate for stop signs based on the above criteria. Because of the sight distance constraints at the southern Wash Drive and Walsh Circle intersection, the stop sign on the northbound approach should be kept. Generally, at an unsigned intersection, the application of the normal right-of-way rules would apply. Figure D taken from the Illinois Drivers Manual shows that the minor roadway should yield to traffic on the major roadway at uncontrolled intersections. Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number New Business #9 Tracking Number PW 2017-72 Windett Ridge Unit 1 – Acceptance of Improvements Public Works Committee – October 17, 2017 Consideration of Approval Subdivision Acceptance Consideration Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department CalAtlantic Homes (Formally Ryland) has requested that the City accept the public improvements for ownership and maintenance. As required by City Code, the developer will be responsible to provide a performance guarantee to cover the one-year maintenance period. This period starts after the City formally accepts the improvements. It should be noted that the City partially accepted improvements within Unit 1 in 2010. The bill of sale associated with that acceptance is attached. All work related to the public improvements that were identified in Ordinance 2013-51 is substantially complete. There are a couple of items that will require on-going maintenance throughout the one-year maintenance period; naturalized pond and the limestone chip path. EEI will perform a new punchlist inspection in late summer 2018 and CalAtlantic will be responsible for addressing any new items. The naturalized storm water basin has been recently inspected by Encap and a report is attached for your information. We have also attached the maintenance and monitoring report from Down to Earth Environmental (Cal-Atlantic’s Contractor). At this time the City Council should consider accepting the remaining public improvements within Unit 1that were not previously accepted as described in the attached Bill of Sale. Along with final acceptance, there may be a bond reduction to 10% of the value of the public improvements (Maintenance Guarantee). Accordingly, the guarantee value shall be as follows: Original Value $664,780.00 Required Value (10% of Original) $66,478.00 Upon approval by the City Council and the receipt of the new security and the executed Bill of Sales, the existing bond may be released. Let us know if you need more information or if you have any questions. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: October 11, 2017 Subject: Windett Ridge Unit 1 1 BILL OF SALE Seller, _______________, in consideration of One and 00/100th Dollar ($1.00), receipt hereby acknowledged, does hereby sell, assign, transfer and convey to the Buyer, the United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation, at 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560, the following personal property to wit described in Exhibit A attached hereto for the development known as Windett Ridge Subdivision, and generally shown on Exhibit B. Seller hereby represents and warrants to Buyer that Seller is the absolute owner of said property, that said property is free and clear of all liens, charges and encumbrances, and that Seller has full right, power, and authority to sell said property and to make this Bill of Sale. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller has signed and sealed this Bill of Sale at ___________________________________, this _____ day of _______________, 20__. Subscribed and Sworn to before me this _____ day of _____________, 20__. _______________________ Notary Public EXHIBIT A WINDETT RIDGE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE UTILITIES UNITS TOTAL Sanitary Sewer: On-Site ROADWAY UNIT QUANTITY 8" PVC SDR 26-3034 FOOT 13,791 WINDETT RIDGE ROAD FOOT 1,845 8" PVC SDR 21-2241 FOOT 163 SUTTON STREET FOOT 130 8" PVC DR 18 FOOT 1,761 FITZHUGH TURN FOOT 206 6" SAN. SERV. NEAR EACH 138 KENTSHIRE DRIVE FOOT 1,595 6" SAN. SERV. FAR EACH 142 CAULFIELD POINT FOOT 171 SAN. MANHOLE 4' DIA.EACH 76 WILTON COURT FOOT 175 DROP MH 4' DIA.EACH 5 FAIRFAX WAY FOOT 3,260 TRENCH BACKFILL CU YD 1,988 PHELPS COURT FOOT 292 Sanitary Sewer: ComEd Easement 24" PVC DR 18 FOOT 2,002 30" PVC SDR 26-3034 FOOT 1,196 30" PVC DR 18 FOOT 900 SAN. MANHOLE 5' DIA.EACH 12 DROP MH 5' DIA EACH 3 30" CONNECTION TO EXISTING MH EACH 1 TRENCH BACKFILL CU YD 806 Watermain: On-Site 8" DIP CLASS 52 W/ POLY & FITTINGS FOOT 9,961 12" DIP CLASS 52 W/ POLY & FITTINGS FOOT 3,290 16" DIP CLASS 52 W/ POLY & FITTINGS FOOT 5,233 1" TYPE K COPPER SERV. NEAR EACH 118 1" TYPE K COPPER SERV. FAR EACH 162 8" GATE VALVE W/ BOX EACH 33 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ 60" VAULT EACH 7 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE W/ 60" VAULT EACH 11 FIRE HYDRANT EACH 60 TRENCH BACKFILL CU YD 1,098 8" DIP CLASS 52 W/ POLY & FITTINGS FOOT 1,390 12" DIP CLASS 52 W/ POLY & FITTINGS FOOT 2,815 8" GATE VALVE W/ BOX EACH 2 12" GATE VALVE W/ 60" VAULT EACH 4 12" CONNECTION TO EXISTING SLUB EACH 1 AUGER 24" CASING UNDER ROUTE 47 LSUM 1 FIRE HYDRANT EACH 13 TRENCH BACKFILL CU YD 192 Storm Sewer: On-Site 4" PVC SDR 26-3034 FOOT 8,160 6" PVC SDR 26-3034 FOOT 5,809 12" ADS N-12 FOOT 1,420 15" ADS N-12 FOOT 633 18" ADS N-12 FOOT 160 24" ADS N-12 FOOT 457 12" RCP CLASS 4 O-RING FOOT 4,757 15" RCP CLASS 4 O-RING FOOT 2,400 18" RCP CLASS 4 O-RING FOOT 773 24" RCP CLASS 4 O-RING FOOT 1,468 30"RCP CLASS 4 O-RING FOOT 2,816 36" RCP CLASS 4 O-RING FOOT 772 42" RCP CLASS 4 O-RING FOOT 205 34" X 53" HE-4 MJ FOOT 54 48" RCP CLASS 4 O-RING FOOT 471 18" DIP CLASS 50 FOOT 238 SUMP INLET/INLET 24" DIA. EACH 133 STORM MH/INLET 48" IDA.EACH 25 STORM MH/INLET 60" DIA.EACH 29 Watermain: Route 47 EXHIBIT A WINDETT RIDGE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE UTILITIES UNITS TOTAL STORM MH 72" DIA.EACH 15 STORM MH 84" DIA.EACH 5 CB 24" DIA.EACH 39 CB 48" DIA.EACH 3 CB 60" DIA.EACH 3 QUIET CONTROL STRUCTURE EACH 2 12" FES W/ GRATE EACH 4 15" FES W/ GRATE EACH 10 24" FES W/ GRATE EACH 10 30" FES W/ GRATE EACH 5 42" FES W/ GRATE EACH 1 34" X 53" FES W/ GRATE EACH 1 48" FES W/ GRATE EACH 1 FIELD TILE CONNECTION EACH 4 TRENCH BACKFILL CU YD 2,650 Miscellaneous Improvements BIKE PATH: AGGREGATE BASE COURSE 8" & BITUMINOUS SURFACE COURSE LSUM 1 PUBLIC WALK FOOT 32,720 STREET LIGHTS EA 59 I L Ro ut e 4 7 Fairfax WayWindett Ridge RdSutton StFairfield AveLegion RdCoach RdKentshire DrR i c h mond A v e Kingsmill StParkside LnWarbler LnManchester LnBonnie LnAshworth LnWy t h e Pl Conservation DrBraemore LnCl ar emont CtHearthstone AveTremont AveHartfield AveDrayton Ct Phelps CtWinterthur GrnWaverly CirSaravanos DrRaintree RdWilton CtFitzhugh TurnCa u lfie ld P t Engineering Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6700 / www.eeiweb.conEXHIBIT BDATE:OCTOBER 2015United City of Yorkville800 Game Farm RoadYorkville, IL 60560(630) 553-4350http://www.yorkville.il.usWINDETT RIDGE UNIT 1UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLEKENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOISCONSULTING ENGINEERSNO. DATE REVISIONSPROJECT NO.:YO1140PATH:H:/GIS/PUBLIC/YORKVILLE/2011/YO1140-LOCATION.MXDFILE:hhhääNORTH0400800FeetLegendPreviously Accepted October 11, 2017 United City of Yorkville c/o Bradley Sanderson, P.E. Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 RE: Windett Ridge Naturalized Basin Punchlist Items Dear Mr. Sanderson, ENCAP, Inc. was requested to review to-date monitoring reports and existing site conditions for the naturalized basin located within the Windett Ridge community, Yorkville, Illinois. Several items from the September 14, 2017 memo issued by ENCAP, Inc. have been addressed, however some items and vegetation concerns remain throughout the naturalized areas.  Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) is a highly invasive species that is present throughout the basin. The ideal time to treat this species is in the Spring before it is allowed to set seed. It appears that some action may have been taken regarding this species, however treatments will be required in Spring of 2018. The vegetative coverage and effectiveness of treatment will be evaluated after the Spring treatments have occurred.  Considerable stands of common reed (Phragmites australis) have established around the basin and appear to have received treatment since the September site inpection. Follow-up treatment of this species through selective spraying and wicking will be necessary during the 2018 growing season. Care should be taken to conserve desirable vegetation surrounding some stands of common reed.  Cattail (Typha spp.) have received partial treatment, and should continue to receive follow-up treatment during the 2018 growing season.  A majority of sandbar willow (Salix interior) has been cut and treated, but this species will continue to be a management target in the 2018 growing season. At the time of the inspection, several instances of small sandbar willow specimens were evident.  Stands of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) stands have been removed, with a few remaining small specimens throughout the basin. This species should continue to be addressed during the 2018 growing season.  Non-native perennial species, in particular Teasel (Dipsacus spp.) have become prevalent in some areas of the basin. These should be targeted with broadleaf-specific herbicide. As this species has already set seed, follow-up will likely be necessary in 2018.  Bare areas resulting from extensive woody clearing or invasive treatment shall be over- seeded with an appropriate seed mix following a prescribed burn currently planned for Spring of 2018. Page 2 of 2 United City of Yorkville c/o Mr. Bradley Sanderson, EEI RE: Windett Ridge Naturalized Basin, Yorkville October 11, 2017 In addition to vegetative coverage and dominance of non-native versus native, desirable species; the Windett Ridge naturalized areas are also evaluated based on the presence of quality native species found within the basin. These species lists are utilized to formulate the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) of the site. Per performance criteria specified in the monitoring report, the natural areas must have a combined FQI of 20 or greater to satisfy the criteria. ENCAP, Inc. has reviewed the inventory lists included in the 2016 monitoring report prepared by Down to Earth Environmental, Inc. and is in concurrence with the species located on-site. The corresponding FQI of the natural areas at the time of this report are 18.8 for the aquatic/emergent area (open water), 23.5 for the Wet Meadow areas, and 24.0 for the Upland Buffer (Pond Slope) areas. Per the data provided, this criteria is considered to be met. ENCAP, Inc., on behalf of EEI and the City of Yorkville, can re-evaluate the site in Summer of 2018 after the aforementioned tasks have been completed and documented. It is expected that the site will be meeting designated criteria after the punchlist items have been completed in the 2017 and 2018 growing seasons. It is highly recommended that a long-term management contract be pursued by the HOA once turnover occurs as the site will continue to need management services to perform as designed. If you should have any questions regarding this information, please feel free to contact me at (815) 748-4500 or sdedina@encapinc.net. Sincerely, ENCAP, Inc. Samantha DeDina Natural Areas Maintenance Superintendent/ Ecologist Attachment: Windett Ridge Site Photographs dated 10.10.2017 Environmental Consultants • PO Box 723, Elgin, Illinois 60121 • Ph 847-514-5474 February 24, 2017 Chris Proberts Land Development Project Manager CalAtlantic Homes 1141 East Main Street, Suite 108 East Dundee, IL 60118 Re: Windett Ridge Subdivision, Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois – 2016 Natural Area/Stormwater Management Report. Dear Chris: Down to Earth Environmental, Inc (DTEE) has prepared the 2016 Natural Area/Stormwater Management Report for the Windett Ridge Subdivision in Yorkville, Illinois. This report will outline the services that were performed during the 2016 growing season within the naturalized stormwater area on-site. This report will not only outline the services completed during the 2016 but include the scheduled maintenance activities to achieve the developmental standards for the subject site. During the past few growing seasons, specifically 2015 and 2016, on behalf of CalAtlantic Homes DTEE has been working with the village to complete the punch list for the natural pond detention area on the south end of the subdivision. In June of 2015 we received an approval of the original punch list items. This was followed-up with an additional punch list by the city in August of 2015. The naturalized detention punch list items were completed in late Spring 2016 an accepted by city personnel in June 2016. We requested that the native area be moved into the maintenance period with the acceptance of the outstanding items. Due to other items on the site the maintenance period was put on hold. I contend that the native pond is different from the other areas on the site from the vegetation to the required maintenance and this area should be placed in the maintenance period for the goal of acceptance after the year period. Below we have outlined some of the general performance standards and maintenance schedule for the native, detention pond area. We have also included a Floristic Quality Index (FQI) of the native area just as an indicator of the plant life that is on the subject site. In simple terms DTEE will continue the maintenance program that has been implemented since 2014. The general services will include dormant mowing in the fall, controlled burns on even numbered years, and spot herbicide treatments where necessary. Additional services that have been implemented in the past few seasons include invasive tree removal (sandbar willows) and over seeding. We have indicated the services provided and the service year below. As an additional note, the limestone path maintenance will be on-going – in 2017 we will rake the path in the spring and maintain the herbicide treatments throughout the summer as needed. Environmental Consultants • PO Box 723, Elgin, Illinois 60121 • Ph 847-514-5474 General Performance Standards for Windett Ridge Subdivision 1. A temporary cover crop must be sown on all slopes immediately upon completion of grading to prevent erosion. Within 3 months of sowing, at least 90% of the slopes, as measured by aerial coverage, will be vegetated. If the desired long-term slope vegetation is not sown with the temporary cover crop, it must then be sown in the first available growing season. All cover crop species must be non-persistent or native. 2. The following goals must be achieved for percent native, non-weedy species on the naturalized areas: Year 2 - 45%, Year 3 – 55%, Year 4 – 65%, and Year 5+ - 85% 3. By the third year and beyond, a minimum of 30 native perennial species must be present in the natural areas collectively (i.e. prairie buffer slopes and stormwater management facilities combined). 4. By the third year and beyond, the native floristic quality index value (native FQI) must be greater than or equal to 20 in the natural areas. The floristic quality assessment method is described in Swink, Floyd and Gerould Wilhelm, Plants of the Chicago Region. 5. Persistent weed species, including but not limited to Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Common Reed (Phragmites australis). Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinaced), sweet clovers (Melilotus spp.), clovers (Trifolium spp.), thistles (Cirsium spp. and Carduus spp.) or teasel (Dipsacus spp.) will be controlled so that they do not be dominant species on the subject site. It should be noted that the site has met all the above performance standards. Weed control is on- going but after the 2016 growing season the dominant nature of these invasive plants is diminishing and are being maintained. Ecological Maintenance Prescribed Burns. Prescribed burns are required for prairie buffer every other growing season and then as needed. Special priority should be given to specific area that contain a large component of Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris Amndinacea) will be conducted in spring. Area that contains an abundance of cattail will be burned in fall. Controlled Burns were completed in 2014 and 2016. Purple Loosestrife Control Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) control is required throughout wetland buffer. All plants found of this nuisance species should be pulled or treated with herbicide in June or July. Purple Loosestrife will continue to be controlled. Environmental Consultants • PO Box 723, Elgin, Illinois 60121 • Ph 847-514-5474 Cattail Control Narrow-leaved Cattail (Typha angustifolia) should be controlled in all areas. Cattail control is required for area with the designated goal of floristic functional improvement, because cattail is an unacceptable dominant species which tends to displace native species. A combination of burns and herbicide treatments will be utilized. Cattails are not a major issue on the site due to the water lily presence Reed Canary Grass Control Reed Canary Grass should be controlled in the Naturalized Area adjacent to the detention basin. Reed Canary Grass is a very aggressive species that can degrade natural areas by displacing native vegetation. To decrease the Reed Canary Grass component in the area, a combination of spring herbicide and controlled burns will be utilized. Reed Canary Grass will continue to be controlled via burns and herbicide. Supplemental Planting Supplemental planting should be conducted yearly, if necessary, to improve 'floristic diversity and bring prairie buffer area into compliance with applicable performance standards. This would include over seeding scheduled for after controlled burns and after season. Over seed completed in 2016 Post-Planting inspections Planting inspections will be completed monthly to monitor hydrology, erosion, and plant or seed establishment and condition, in the natural areas. During these inspections, water levels within the stormwater management facilities in particular, shall be evaluated to ensure that adequate hydrology is present for successful establishment, or if areas require irrigation due to dry conditions. Annual reporting and inspections will continue. Annual Mowing Mowing the vegetation in the natural areas one time per year will be completed after October 15th or at the end of the growing season. The vegetation height will be no lower than 8 inches after mowing is completed. Over seed will be completed in the fall to coordinate the winter stratification or after the controlled burn to take advantage of the darkened surface to promote germination. Dormant mowing completed in October 2016 Selective Herbicide Application Management of the vegetation in the mitigation area should include selective application of herbicide to control aggressive plant species such as, but not limited to. Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), Common Reed (Phragmites australis), Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea) sweet clovers (Melilotus spp.), clovers (Trifolium spp.X), thistles (Cirsium spp. and Carduus spp.) or teasel (Dipsacus spp.). These weedy species amongst others can displace desirable species, thereby reducing floristic diversity. Herbicide application will be made by Environmental Consultants • PO Box 723, Elgin, Illinois 60121 • Ph 847-514-5474 certified, trained, and experienced professionals. Invasive tree removal and herbicide treatments will be more applicable for this site but all the above will be reviewed and treated. Tree Removal and treatments will continue into 2017, but the level of invasive tree coverage has been reduced each growing season and should be relatively controlled after the 2017 season. Monitoring Vegetation Monitoring A floristic inventory is to be compiled of the plant species occurring in the natural areas at least twice during each growing season. During vegetation monitoring sessions, overall vegetative coverage and dominant plant species in each area are to be recorded. All plant species in these areas are to be scheduled and evaluated using the Floristic Quality Assessment (FAQ) method. Vegetation monitoring will be conducted during May/June and August/September, so that complete growing season data can be collected. Representative photographs will be taken from designated photo points during each monitoring session to document changes in the areas over time and allow for accurate comparison. Management Recommendations Recommendations will be recorded during monitoring sessions to provide remedial action necessary to address problem areas and meet project goals. A schedule of activities will be included to document the corrective actions. Management and Monitoring Reports will be made on all management activities conducted at the site for including mechanical or chemical weed control, supplemental planting or seeding, irrigation, or prescribed burning. Each annual monitoring report will also provide recommended management activities for the following year, in order to achieve performance standards and project objectives. Debris Management All trash, brush, grass, clipping debris etc. will be removed as needed from the Naturalized detention facility, drainage swales, emergency outflows and flood routes. This includes all areas within the naturalized detention facility, such as Open Water, Emergent, and Prairie areas. Stormwater Management Structures All marked control structures and silt basin(s), Emergency spillways, flood routes etc. will be cleaned out and /or repaired as needed to prevent clogging. This will be especially important in early spring and late fall. Erosion Control Management All erosion control device structures and features are to be installed. Floristic Quality Index (FQI) Aquatic/Emergent Area 22 Native Species 24 Total Species 4.0 Native Mean C-Value Environmental Consultants • PO Box 723, Elgin, Illinois 60121 • Ph 847-514-5474 18.8 Native FQI AVG: Obl. Wetland COMMON NAME C-VALUE SCIENTIFIC NAME WETNESS Common Water Planitain 4 Alisma subcordatum OBL – Forb Swamp Milkweed 4 Asclepias incarmata OBL – Forb Common Fox Sedge 3 Carex stipata OBL - Sedge Brown Fox Sedge 2 Carex vulpinoidea OBL – Sedge Needle Spike Rush 2 Eleocharis acicularis OBL – Sedge Red-Rooted Spike Rush 2 Eleocharis erythropoda OBL – Sedge Blue Flag 5 Iris virginica shrevei OBL – Forb Rice Cut Grass 4 Leersia oryzoides OBL – Grass White Water Lily 7 Nymphaea tuberosa OBL – Forb Small Duckweed 5 Lemna minor OBL – Forb Reed Canary Grass 0 Phalaris arundinacea FACW – Grass Illinois Pondweed 7 Potamogeton illinoensis OBL – Forb Long-Leaved Pondweed 7 Potamogeton nodosus OBL – Forb Common Arrowhead 4 Sagittaria latifolia OBL – Forb Crack Willow 0 Salix fragilis FAC+ - Tree Sandbar Willow 1 Salix interior OBL – shrub Black Willow 4 Salix nigra OBL – tree Hard-Stemmed Bulrush 6 Scripus acutus OBL – Sedge River Bulrush 4 Scripus fluviatilis OBL – Sedge Great Bulrush 5 Scripus validus creber OBL – Sedge Common Bur Reed 6 Sparganium eurycarpum OBL – Forb Prairie Cord Grass 4 Spartina pectinata FACW – Grass Narrow-Leaved Cattail 1 Typha angustifolia OBL- Forb Broad-Leaved Cattail 1 Typha latifolia OBL – Forb. Wet Meadow Area 50 Native Species 59 Total Species 3.3 Native Mean C-Value 23.5 Native FQI AVG: FAC Wetland COMMON NAME C-VALUE SCIENTIFIC NAME WETNESS Redtop 0 Agrostis alba FACW - Grass Common Water Planitain 4 Alisma subcordatum OBL – Forb Common Ragweed 0 Ambrosia artemisiifoliaelator FACU- Forb Giant Ragweed 0 Ambrosia trifida FAC – Forb Indian Hemp 4 Apocynum cannabinum FAC - Forb Swamp Milkweed 4 Asclepias incarmata OBL – Forb Side Flowering Aster 4 Aster lateriflorus FACW – Forb New England Aster 2 Aster novae-angliae FACW-Forb Panicled Aster 2 Aster simplex OBL – Forb Environmental Consultants • PO Box 723, Elgin, Illinois 60121 • Ph 847-514-5474 Yellow Rocket 0 Barbarea vulgaris FAC – Frob Common Beggar’s Ticks 1 Bidens frondosa FAC – Forb Bebb’s Oval Sedge 6 Carex bebbii OBL – Sedge Crested Oval Sedge 4 Carex cristatella FACW - Sedge Common Fox Sedge 3 Carex stipata OBL – Sedge Awl-Fruited Oval Sedge 3 Carex tribuloides OBL - Sedge Brown Fox Sedge 2 Carex vulpinoidea OBL – Sedge Partridge Pea 4 Cassia fasciculate FACU – Forb Field Thistle 0 Cirsium arvense UPL – Forb Barnyard Grass 0 Echinochloa crusgalli FACW - Grass Red-Rooted Spike Rush 2 Eleocharis erythropoda OBL – Sedge Blunt Spike Rush 3 Eleocharis obtuse OBL – Sedge Virginia Wild Rye 4 Elymus virginicus FACW- Grass Annual Fleabane 0 Erigeron annuus FAC-Forb Daisy Fleabane 5 Erigeron strigosus UPL-Forb Common Boneset 4 Eupatorium perfoliatum FACW-Forb Wild Strawberry 1 Fragaria virginiana FAC – Frob Sawtooth Sunflower 2 Helianthus grosseserratus FACW – Forb Squirrel-Tail Grass 0 Hordeum jubatum FAC - Grass Blue Flag 5 Iris virginica shrevei OBL – Forb Dudley’s Rush 4 Juncus dudleyi FAC – Forb Torrey’s Rush 4 Juncus torreyi FACW - Frob Rice Cut Grass 4 Leersia oryzoides OBL – Grass Common Water Horehound 5 Lycopus americanus OBL – Forb Purple Loosestrife 0 Lythrum salicaria OBL – Forb Wild Bergamot 4 Monarda fistulosa FACU – Forb Switch Grass 5 Panicum virgatum FAC – Grass Foxglove Beard Tongue 4 Penstemon digitalis FAC – Forb Ditch Stonecrop 5 Penthorum sedoides OBL -Forb Reed Canary Grass 0 Phalaris arundinacea FACW – Grass Common Reed 1 Phargmites australis FACW – Grass Water Knotweed 4 Polygonum amphibium stip OBL-Forb Pinkweed 0 Polygonum pensylvanicum FACW – Forb Eastern Cottonwood 2 Populus deltoids FAC – Tree Common Mountain Mint 5 Pycnanthemum virginianum FACW-Forb Cursed Buttercup 6 Ranunculus sceleratus OBL-Forb Curly Dock 0 Rumex crispus FAC – Frob Peach-Leaved Willow 5 Salix amygdaloides FACW - Tree Sandbar Willow 1 Salix interior OBL – shrub Black Willow 4 Salix nigra OBL – tree Dark Green Rush 4 Scripus atrovirens OBL p Sedge River Bulrush 4 Scripus fluviatilis OBL – Sedge Red Bulrush 4 Scripus pendulus OBL - Sedge Cup Plant 5 Silphium perfoliatum FACW – Forb Bittersweet Nightshade 0 Solanum Dulcamara FAC – Vine Tall Goldenrod 1 Solidago altissima FACU – Forb Late Goldenrod 4 Solidago gigantean FACW – Forb Prairie Cord Grass 4 Sparina pectinata FACW – Grass Environmental Consultants • PO Box 723, Elgin, Illinois 60121 • Ph 847-514-5474 Red Clover 0 Trifolium pretense UPL – Forb Blue Vervain 4 Verbena hastate FACW – Forb Upland Buffer – Pond Slope Prairie Plants 50 Native Species 77 Total Species 3.4 Native Mean C-Value 24.0 Native FQI AVG: FAC Upland COMMON NAME C-VALUE SCIENTIFIC NAME WETNESS Yarrow 4 Achillea millefolium FACU – Forb Common Ragweed 0 Ambrosia artemisiifoliaelator FACU- Forb Giant Ragweed 0 Ambrosia trifida FAC – Forb Big Bluestem Grass 5 Andropogon gerardii FAC - Forb Little Bluestem Grass 5 Andropogon scoparius FACU - Grass Common Milkweed 0 Asclepias syriaca UPL - Forb Whorled Milkweed 1 Asclepias verticillata UPL - Frob Heath Aster 5 Aster ericoides FACU - Forb Smooth Blue Aster 9 Aster laevis UPL – Forb New England Aster 2 Aster novae-angliae FACW-Forb Hairy Aster 0 Aster pilosus FACU - Forb Hungarian Brome 0 Bromus inermis UPL - Grass Partridge Pea 4 Cassia fasciculate FACU – Forb Ox-Eye Daisy 0 Chrysanthemum leu. Pin UPL – Forb Chicory 0 Cichorium intybus UPL - Forb Field Thistle 0 Cirsium arvense UPL – Forb Bull Thistle 0 Cirsium vulgare FACU – Forb Hedge Bindweed 1 Convolvulus sepium FAC – Forb Prairie Coreopsis 6 Coreopsis palmate UPL – Forb Tall Coreopsis 5 Coreopsis tripteris FAC – Forb Gray Dogwood 1 Cornus recemosa FACW – Shrub Crown Vetch 0 Cornilla varia UPL – Forb Queen Anne’s Lace 0 Daucus carota UPL - Forb Deptford Pink 0 Dianthus Armeria UPL – Forb Purple Coneflower 8 Echinacea pallid UPL – Forb Broad-Leaved Purple Coneflower 3 Echinacea purpurea UPL – Forb Canada Wild Rye 4 Elymus Canadensis FAC – Grass Virginia Wild Rye 4 Elymus virginicus FACW – Grass Daisy Fleabane 5 Erigeron strigosus UPL-Forb Meadow Fescue 0 Festuca pratensis FACU – Grass Annual Bedstraw 1 Galium aparine FACU – Forb Honey Locust 2 Gleditsia triancanthos FAC - Tree Sawtooth Sunflower 2 Helianthus grosseserratus FACW – Forb False Sunflower 5 Heliopsis helianthoides UPL – Forb Dame’s Rocket 0 Hesperis matronalis UPL – Forb Environmental Consultants • PO Box 723, Elgin, Illinois 60121 • Ph 847-514-5474 Common Morning Glory 0 Ipomoea purpurea FACU – Forb Prickly Lettuce 0 Laxtuca serriola FAC – Forb Common Peppercress 0 Ledidium virginicum FACU – Forb Yellow Sweet Clover 0 Melilotus officinals FACU - Forb Wild Bergamot 4 Monarda fistulosa FACU – Forb Common Evening Primrose 0 Oenothera biennis FACU – Forb Wild Parsnip 0 Pastinaca sativa UPL - Forb Foxglove Beard Tongue 4 Penstemon digitalis FAC – Forb Purple Prairie Clover 9 Petalostemum purpureum UPL – Forb Reed Canary Grass 0 Phalaris arundinacea FACW – Grass Garden Phlox 0 Phloix paniculata FACU – Forb Tall Ground Cherry 0 Physalia subglabrata UPL – Forb Kentucky Blue Grass 0 Poa pratensis FAC- Grass Water Knotweed 4 Polygonum amphibium stip OBL-Forb Pinkweed 0 Polygonum pensylvanicum FACW – Forb Lady’s Thumb 0 Polygonum persicara FAC- Forb Eastern Cottonwood 2 Populus deltoids FAC – Tree Hairy Mountain Mint 5 Pycnanthemum pilosum UPL - Forb Common Mountain Mint 5 Pycnanthemum virginianum FACW-Forb Yellow Coneflower 4 Ratibida pinnata UPL – Forb Poison Ivy 2 Rhus radicans FAC – Vine Pasture Rose 5 Rosa Carolina FACU – Shrub Black Raspberry 2 Rubus occidentalis UPL – Shrub Black Eyed-Susan 1 Rudbeckia hirta FACU – Forb Sweet Black-Eyed Susan 9 Rudbeckia subtomentosa FACU - Forb Curly Dock 0 Rumex crispus FAC – Forb Sweet William Catchfly 0 Silene Armeria UPL – Forb Compass Plant 5 Silphium laciniatum UPL - Forb Cup Plant 5 Silphium perfoliatum FACW – Forb Prairie Dock 5 Silphium terebinthinaceum FACU - Forb Tall Goldenrod 1 Solidago altissima FACU – Forb Common Grass- Leaf Goldenrod 4 Soildago graminifolia FACW – Forb Stiff Goldenrod 4 Solidago rigida FACU – Forb Common Sow Thistle 0 Sonchus ugliginosus FAC – Forb Indian Grass 5 Sorghastrum nutans FACU – Grass Common Dandelion 0 Taraxacum officinale FACU – Forb Penny Cress 0 Thlaspi arvense UPL – Forb Common Spiderwort 2 Tradescantia ohiensis FACU - Forb Red Clover 0 Trifolium pretense UPL – Forb White Clover 0 Trifolium repens FACU – Forb Common Mullen 0 Verbascum Thapsus UPL – Forb Riverbank Grape 2 Vitis riparia FACW – Vine Recommendations and Conclusions for 2016 Down to Earth Environmental, Inc has been retained by CalAtlantic Homes to complete the management and maintenance for the Windett Ridge Subdivision in United City of Yorkville, Environmental Consultants • PO Box 723, Elgin, Illinois 60121 • Ph 847-514-5474 Kendall County, Illinois. Above we have outlined the agreed on maintenance plan and management activities that has been implemented to achieve the performance standards. As mentioned in the report various punch lists were created and satisfied specifically for the naturalized detention areas in 2015 and 2016. We will continue the maintenance as outlined above from a general standpoint. However, we will continue to treat the invasive trees and plants along with Fall over seed to promote the winter stratification of the seed for maximum benefit. It is our opinion that the naturalized area is meeting the developmental standards and the maintenance period time clock for this specific area should already be in the required maintenance period. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Sincerely, Down To Earth Environmental, Inc. Jon T. Turner President CC: Brad Sanderson – EEI Eric Dhuse – United City of Yorkville – Public Works David Stewart - EEI Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number New Business #10 Tracking Number PW 2017-73 ITEP Grant Applications Public Works Committee – October 17, 2017 N/A Majority Recommendation to proceed/not proceed with applications for each project. See attached memo. Bart Olson Administration Name Department Overview The Illinois Transportation Enhancement Program (ITEP) is a competitive grant reimbursement program. It is a federally funded program that requires local matching funds from an eligible project sponsor. The program focuses on providing alternate modes of transportation where the scope of transportation projects goes beyond the traditional accommodations for cars, trucks and transit. Typical projects include bicycle/pedestrian trails and streetscape projects. IDOT’s next ITEP application period began on Monday, October 2, 2017 and ends on Friday, December 1, 2017 at 4:30 PM CST. The Review and Selection Period should take place from December 2017 to April 2018 with an announcement of selected projects in the spring of 2018. Funding Applicants may apply for up to $2,000,000 maximum per project in federal ITEP funds. Approximately $40,000,000 will be awarded this cycle. Federal funds will provide reimbursement up to 50 percent for right-of-way and easement acquisition costs, and up to 80 percent for preliminary engineering, utility relocations, construction engineering, and construction costs. The required 20 percent or 50 percent local match is the responsibility of the project sponsor. Utilizing federal funds for right-of-way and easement acquisition costs and preliminary engineering costs will lengthen the time required for the project significantly as these activities require federal authorization before proceeding. Project Evaluation and Review Criteria All ITEP projects must be selected through a competitive process. In order to comply with federal guidelines, IDOT has developed a numerically-based scoring process. Unfortunately, this scoring methodology and point system is not available, and the scoring for previous projects is never released. Accordingly, this makes the ITEP funding source difficult to predict. We have included a list of the 33 selected projects from the 2016 cycle for your reference. If more than one application is submitted by a project sponsor, each application will be reviewed and scored based on its own merit, regardless of category or relationship to any other application submissions. Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Brad Sanderson, EEI; Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator; Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: October 3, 2017 Subject: Potential 2018 ITEP Applications The review criteria for ITEP projects are listed as:  Eligibility  Strength of transportation relationship  Project meets category intent  Public benefits and accessibility  Connectivity to existing facilities/linkage  Project support/local commitment  Prior sponsor investment  Project sponsor capacity, readiness and past performance  Application completeness/information provided  Inclusion in a local, state or regional plan  Cost effectiveness  Planning and coordination  Project readiness  Extra points will be given for the completion of Phase I Engineering  Extra points will be given for the completion of Land Acquisition As noted above, extra points are provided for project readiness, completion of Phase I Engineering, and completion of Land Acquisition. This is also true for Surface Transportation Program (STP) and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) scoring methodologies. Submitting for CMAQ funding also requires a Phase I to be in process. If possible, the City should consider completing Phase I Engineering on selected projects to increase a chance for funding. Potential Projects Staff has identified three potential projects which we have investigated further. The projects are as follows:  Fox Road Multi-Use Path from IL 47 to Hoover Forest Preserve  ComEd Multi-Use Path from Kingsmill Street to Riverfront Park  Downtown Hill Landscaping Further detail about each project is provided on the following pages. Fox Road Multi-Use Path Project Perimeters (Logical Termini): IL Route 47 west to Hoover Forest Preserve Entrance Existing Supportive Plans that references project: Kane/Kendall Council of Mayors 2017 Bicycle Planning Map Yorkville Trail Map (no date listed) Yorkville Integrated Transportation Plan (2009) Yorkville Comprehensive Plan (2016) Easement or Land Acquisition Required: Right-of-way or easements would need to be acquired along the length of the project. Brief Description: This path would provide a safe route for cyclists and pedestrians to travel to and from the downtown area to City and County subdivisions without walking/biking on Fox Road that would eventually lead to Hoover Forest Preserve. This would also give pedestrians and cyclists a safe alternative to an on-street option. This would be the first leg of a very important regional trail. Hoover Forest Preserve is a regional destination. It is the home course for the Yorkville Foxes boys and girls cross country teams, a county wide outdoor education center and meeting center. In addition, the preserve has 400+ acres to explore along the Fox River. In the long term, this trail would bring the City’s regional trail system closer to the Eldamain Road Bridge project, which is expected to have its own trail system. It is expected that the Eldamain Rd Bridge project will bring the entire trail system very close to the Silver Springs State Park. Benefits: This trail would allow over 450 homes in the River’s Edge subdivision, White Oak, Fox Glen, Fox Lawn, and homes within the older downtown area of Yorkville, new access to the regional trail network. In the opposite direction, this trail would provide direct trail access to Hoover Forest Preserve’s trail system for the majority of the City. Concern: ROW and land acquisition is a timely and costly process. Estimated Cost: Total Cost: $2,550,000 Grant amount: $1,700,000 Local Share: $850,000 ($725,000 City and $125,000 County) Of the $850,000 local share, we expect $125,000 to be attributable to the trail section that runs from the west side of River’s Edge all the way to the entrance of Hoover. Since City limits generally end at River’s Edge, this trail section west of River’s Edge would be the County’s trail. Since multi- jurisdictional projects should score higher than single-jurisdiction projects, staff plans to approach Kendall County staff to see if they are interested in completing that section of trail and providing funding for it through the City’s ITEP application. Fox Road Multi-Use Path (continued) General Rating: Out of the three projects considered for ITEP, we would expect this project to be the second most likely project to be funded. Based on our understanding of the grant rating process, we think this project will be a decent candidate for funding. ComEd Multi-Use Path Project Perimeters (Logical Termini): Kingsmill Street to Riverfront Park Existing Supportive Plans that references project: Kane/Kendall Council of Mayors 2017 Bicycle Planning Map Yorkville Trail Map (no date listed) Yorkville Integrated Transportation Plan (2009) Yorkville Comprehensive Plan (2016) Easement or Land Acquisition Required: The City currently has an easement agreement with ComEd for the land the multi-use path is proposed to be constructed upon. Easements may be needed along Van Emmon and Mill. Brief Description: Proposed project will complete a multi-use trail gap through a beautiful wooded, stream-lined area that is not along a major arterial roadway (IL 47). The proposed multi-use ComEd path allows the City to plan for an active path through a natural area that has been set aside for the intent of recreational use. This will encourage north south travel in a growing and also throughout an established residential area. It will also provide access to an additional recreational area along the Fox River front and a connection to the downtown commercial corridor. The culverts and bridges that will be installed along the path will also provide a drainage benefit to the naturalized area. Benefits: This trail would allow new, direct access to the regional trail system for over 1,555 homes. This path will be much more picturesque than the Route 47 path. Concern: When the Route 71 expansion project occurs in the next 2-5 years, residents of Raintree Village, Windett Ridge, Country Hills, and Prestwick will be able to connect to the regional trail system through the Route 71 trail. So, the ComEd trail would somewhat duplicate an existing regional trail service. Estimated Cost: Total Cost: $3,200,000 Grant amount: $2,000,000 Local Share: $1,200,000 General Rating: Out of the three projects considered for ITEP, we would expect this project to be the most likely project to be funded. It has minor acquisition issues and it connects a large number of homes to the regional trail network. Based on our understanding of the grant rating process, we think this project will be an excellent candidate for funding. Downtown Hill Landscaping Project Project Perimeters (Logical Termini): Embankment of approximately 75’ wide, 560’ long and 20’ tall, on the west side of Illinois Route 47/Bridge Street, beginning at the southwest corner of IL Rte 47 and East Van Emmon Street and continuing south. Existing Supportive Plans that references project: Yorkville Comprehensive Plan (2016) Downtown Overlay District Plan (2018) Easement or Land Acquisition Required: None Brief Description: Streetscape and landscape treatments for a key visible open space along the Illinois Route 47 Corridor in downtown Yorkville which beautifies and improves the visual character of the corridor and downtown, simplifies maintenance and contributes to an overall sense of place for Yorkville. Benefits: Streetscape design along this highly traveled arterial roadway can create a safe built environment for pedestrians, landmark or focal point feature, and spur economic activity for the nearby business community as a result of the improvements. Site furnishings, light fixtures, waste receptacles, seating areas, paving patterns and planting areas are all elements proposed in the project’s design plan. The proposed design promotes reduced water treatment costs by facilitating natural storm water filtration. The City could also use TIF funds for the project. Concern: This has a limited regional benefit. While we would argue that the overall perception of the City would increase with such a dramatic project, this will not be part of the ITEP rating system. While the project is relatively low cost to the City (a benefit!), the ITEP grant system generally leans towards larger, higher cost projects. Finally, this project contains no transportation related improvements. Estimated Cost: Total Cost: $680,000 Grant amount: $495,000 Local Share: $185,000 Potential Additional Project Items to Include (not included in current project estimate): Improvements to crosswalks, pavement enhancements, traffic control devices and treatments to assist persons with disabilities. Downtown Hill Landscaping Project (continued) General Rating: Out of the three projects considered for ITEP, we would expect this project to be the least likely project to be funded. However, based on our understanding of the grant rating process, we think this project will be a decent candidate for funding. Cycle 12 2016 Approved ITEP Projects 33 Projects = $30,679,850* ITEP Number Project Sponsor Project Title Approved ITEP Funds 141013 City of Park Ridge Park Ridge - South Northwest Highway Streetscape $1,289,150 141047 Village of Niles Niles - Milwaukee Avenue Corridor Improvements - Phase VI $698,620 141051 Village of Romeoville Romeoville Proposed Metra Station - New Construction $296,700 141054 Village of Channahon Channahon- Bridge Street Multi-use Path $682,480 141082 Village of Johnsburg Church Street Streetscape Improvements $1,072,100 241003 Rockford Park District Jefferson Street Bridge Underpass $2,000,000 241005 Winnebago County Winnebago County - Perryville Bike Path Extension (Hart Road to Willow Brook Lane)$984,960 241010 City of Silvis Silvis - Avenue of the Cities Shared-use Path $340,300 241013 City of Dixon Bike Path Extension Project $2,000,000 241014 Village of Port Byron Illinois Route 84 Corridor Enhancement Project - Phase II $1,153,920 341003 Sycamore Park District The Great Western Trail: Brickville Road to Main Street $632,600 341006 City of Ottawa Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Spanning I-80 $2,000,000 341015 Village of Bradley Illinois Route 50 Shared Path Mall Entrance to Larry Power Road $333,800 441007 City of Peoria Rock Island Greenway Extension $485,170 441009 City of Washington McClugage Road/Centennial Drive Recreation Trail Connection $255,840 441011 Village of Creve Coeur Illinois Route 29 Sidewalk and Lighting Improvement $1,936,200 541001 McLean County Historic Route 66 Bikeway - 1.1 Miles South of Shirley to Funk's Grove $160,000 541004 City of Champaign Bradley Avenue Corridor Complete Street $2,000,000 541005 Urbana Park District Park Street Shared-use Path $426,600 541010 Champaign County Forest Preserve District Kickapoo Rail Trail - Phase Two Design Engineering $225,000 641001 City of Litchfield Litchfield Streetscaping - Phase III $1,937,800 641002 Quincy Park District Bill Klingner Bike/Pedestrian Trail - 18th to 24th Street $791,990 641008 Village of Williamsville Heritage Route 66 Trail - Williamsville to Sherman $2,000,000 641016 City of Pana Pana - Lincoln Prairie Trail Bridge Replacement $497,120 641018 City of Havana Business Park Sidewalk Addition $264,130 641020 Sangamon County Sangamon Valley Trail Extension $420,800 741001 City of Charleston Charleston to Mattoon Lincoln Prairie Grass Trail Pedestrian/Bicycle Facility Improvements $800,000 741004 Village of Dieterich Dieterich Downtown Enhancements $1,023,010 741008 City of Newton City of Newton Phase IV - Eagle Trails $1,056,000 741011 City of Effingham Bike Path - Effingham Pavement Marking and Signage Project $934,400 841004 City of Columbia Main Street Streetscape - Phase 2 $998,140 941006 City of Eldorado Eldorado - Rt 45 and Rt 142 Pedestrian Access $274,080 941007 City of Carbondale Carbondale - Northwest Pedestrian and Bicycle Path $708,940 $30,679,850 *The committed dollar amounts may change, pending a more detailed project review to determine any costs ineligible for federal reimbursement such as contingency fees, routine maintenance, road work, etc. Fox RdRiver RdS B r i d g e S tW Fox StP o p l a r D r Hale StW a l s hDrMill StPavillion RdSchaefer RdW River StState StW H i g h p o i n t R dS Main StIllinoisRoute#71Maple StStagecoachTrlDeerStHillside DrHeustis StKing StR e d G ate LnFox St SF o rdD rEldamain RdGreen Briar RdBeaver StW Center StW Ridge StHighviewDrN Bridge StMorgan StKellyAveChurch StMitchel DrPoloClubDrAdrian StW Somonauk StFox CtColton StW Madison StE Orange StWalsh CirE H i g h p o i n t R dSchoolhouse RdBlaine StFoxboro DrWhiteOakWayElizabeth StColonialPkwyWindhamCirB a d g e r S tGarden StE Main StRiver Birch DrJamestownD rW B a r b e rryCirWolf StNorway CirA s t e r D rE Washington StW Van Emmon StBonnie LnR e d h o r s e L n B l a c k h a w k S p r i n g sE Van Emmon StEBarberryCirW a ln u t D rS a ravanosDrE Hydraulic AveWatercress RdFoxGlenDrWCornersto n e DrStony Creek LnC o r a l b e r r y C t Pine CtG a r d enCirW Hydraulic AveW Dolph StFir CtBell StG l e n N e l s o n D r E Cedar CtW Birch CtBuckthorn CtStagecoach TrlEngineering Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6700UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE2018 ITEP APPLICATIONFOX ROAD SHARED USE PATH www.eeiweb.comDATEDATE:PROJECT NO.:FILE:PATH:BY:September 2017YO1736YO1736_2018 ITEP AppH:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2017\MJTNO.REVISIONS³United City of Yorkville800 Game Farm RoadYorkville, IL 60560630-553-4350www.yorkville.il.us1,400 0 1,400700 FeetHOOVER FOREST PRESERVELegendFuture County Shared Use Path (Eldamain Rd)Future City Shared Use PathProposed Shared Use PathExisting City Owned/Maintained AsphaltExisting County TrailSILVER SPRINGSSTATE PARK8,350 FT JOB NO:YO1736-C DESIGNED:CMF DATE:October 3, 2017 PROJECT TITLE:Fox Road Multi-Use Path ITEM UNIT NO.UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 1 CY 4,453 30.00$ 133,600.00$ 2 SY 11,133 1.50$ 16,700.00$ 3 SY 2,227 15.00$ 33,400.00$ 4 LF 16,700 2.00$ 33,400.00$ 5 SY 11,133 20.00$ 222,660.00$ 6 LB 25,050 0.50$ 12,525.00$ 7 TON 1,067 100.00$ 106,700.00$ 8 SF 260 30.00$ 7,800.00$ 9 SF 1,300 10.00$ 13,000.00$ 10 FT 420 2.00$ 840.00$ 11 FT 660 4.00$ 2,640.00$ 12 FT 75 8.00$ 600.00$ 13 SF 13,875 2.00$ 27,750.00$ 14 SY 13,917 8.00$ 111,336.00$ 15 LS 1 55,000.00$ 55,000.00$ 16 LS 1 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 17 LS 1 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 18 LS 1 22,000.00$ 22,000.00$ 19 LS 1 150,000.00$ 150,000.00$ 20 -$ 21 -$ 22 -$ 23 -$ SUBTOTAL 982,451.00$ LAND ACQ ASSUMPTIONS:CONTINGENCY (10%)98,400.00$ ROW AND/OR EASEMENT NEEDED FOR 6,975'TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE 1,080,849.44$ 5,925' - 10' OF ROW AND 5' OF EASEMENT ENGINEERING, GEOTECHNICAL AND TESTING (32%)345,900.00$ 1,050' - 20' OF EASEMENT ROW/EASEMENT ACQUISITION 845,625.00$ $10 / SQ FT FOR ROW, $5 / SQ FT FOR EASEMENT ROW/EASEMENT DOCUMENTS 261,000.00$ 29 PARCELS REQUIRED TOTAL PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 2,534,000.00$ $2,500 PLAT OF HIGHWAY/TITLE, $2,000 APPRAISAL FEDERAL PARTICIPATION =1,694,712.00$ $1,000 REVIEW APPRAISAL, $3,500 NEGOTIATIONS LOCAL PARTICIPATION =839,288.00$ NOTE: ENGINEERING COSTS ASSUME USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS Preliminary Cost Estimate - All Sections (8,350 LF, 10' Wide) IL 47 to Hoover Forest Preserve ITEM EARTH EXCAVATION GEOTECHNICAL FABRIC FOR GROUND STABILIZATION AGGREGATE SUBGRADE IMPROVEMENT 12" PERIMETER EROSION BARRIER TRAFFIC CONTROL TREE TRIMMING, PRUNING, AND REMOVAL AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 10" BITUMINOUS MATERIALS (PRIME COAT) HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, 2" DETECTABLE WARNINGS PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE BIKE PATH, 5" THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKINGS - LINE 6" BOX CULVERT OR PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKINGS - LINE 12" THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKINGS - LINE 24" SIDEWALK REMOVAL RESTORATION MOBILIZATION PATH SIGNING BridgeVan Emmon Main Spring St a g e c o a c hMillSomonauk Center BenjaminParksi OrangeState Deere Kingr r yHeustisWashington Country Hills Rai nt r eeLibertyBruellBeaver Green Briar K in g s mi llMorganTeriChurchWalshAdrianMcHughGrace Colonial Madison ColtonIdentaBanburyBlaine b o r o West onCoachCrooked CreekWolf Ha z e l t i n e Elizabeth BadgerGarden Gr eenf iel dAsteray OmahaGawne WarblerHartfieldHearthstoneFreemontCl ov e r Ridge Wooden BridgeIllini W aln ut Mui rfi el dS u n n y D e llS ara v a n o s Vi l l age Vi ewWoodworthDolph WorsleyHydraulic WoodlandAuburnColumbineOakwoodDydynaSpruce Me a d o wl a r k Westwind BellJohnsonBat or Beecher CandleberryRodak Bu ckt hor n Jeffersonx Ridge MainDolph MainS c h o ol h o u s eMainHydraulic Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 (630) 466-6700 / www.eeiweb.con DATE:OCTOBER 2017United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 (630) 553-4350 http://www.yorkville.il.us PROPOSED COMED SHARED USE PATH UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS CONSULTING ENGINEERS PROJECT NO.:YO1736 PATH:H:/GIS/PUBLIC/YORKVILLE/2017/ YO1739 COMED SHARED PATH.MXDFILE: fffää NORTH 0 800 1,600 Feet Legend Existing City Owned Trail Proposed ComEd Shared Use Path Proposed RT 71 Shared Use Path 10,700 FT RIVER FRONT PARK JOB NO:YO1736-C DESIGNED:CJO, CMF DATE:October 3, 2017 PROJECT TITLE:ComEd Multi-Use Path ITEM UNIT NO.UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 1 CY 5,720 65.00$ 371,800.00$ 2 SY 14,280 2.00$ 28,560.00$ 3 SY 2,860 20.00$ 57,200.00$ 4 LF 21,400 3.00$ 64,200.00$ 5 SY 14,280 25.00$ 357,000.00$ 6 LB 32,130 0.50$ 16,065.00$ 7 TON 1,390 115.00$ 159,850.00$ 8 SF 240 35.00$ 8,400.00$ 9 SF 1,200 15.00$ 18,000.00$ 10 FT 240 2.00$ 480.00$ 11 FT 510 4.00$ 2,040.00$ 12 FT 20 8.00$ 160.00$ 13 FT 60 2,500.00$ 150,000.00$ 14 EA 1 300,000.00$ 300,000.00$ 15 FT 480 20.00$ 9,600.00$ 16 CY 100 800.00$ 80,000.00$ 17 FT 60 65.00$ 3,900.00$ 18 EA 6 800.00$ 4,800.00$ 19 EA 5 1,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 20 SY 17,850 8.00$ 142,800.00$ 21 LS 1 100,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 22 LS 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 23 LS 1 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 24 LS 1 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25 LS 1 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 26 LS 1 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 27 SF 4575 2.00$ 9,150.00$ 28 -$ 29 -$ 30 -$ SUBTOTAL 2,020,005.00$ LAND ACQ ASSUMPTIONS:CONTINGENCY (10%)202,100.00$ 1500' NEEDED ALONG VAN EMMON AND MILL TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE 2,222,105.00$ 10' OF ROW AND 5' OF EASEMENT ENGINEERING, GEOTECHNICAL AND TESTING (32%)711,100.00$ $10 / SQ FT FOR ROW, $5 / SQ FT FOR EASEMENT ROW/EASEMENT ACQUISITION 187,500.00$ 12 PARCELS REQUIRED ROW/EASEMENT DOCUMENTS 108,000.00$ $2,500 PLAT OF HIGHWAY/TITLE, $2,000 APPRAISAL TOTAL PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 3,229,000.00$ $1,000 REVIEW APPRAISAL, $3,500 NEGOTIATIONS FEDERAL PARTICIPATION =2,000,000.00$ LOCAL PARTICIPATION =1,229,000.00$ NOTE: ENGINEERING COSTS ASSUME USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS TRAFFIC CONTROL CROSSING SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS TREE TRIMMING, PRUNING, AND REMOVAL RAILROAD CROSSING ENHANCEMENTS SIDEWALK REMOVAL REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CULVERT, 15 INCH PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE FLARED END SECTIONS, 15 INCH LOCKING COLLAPSABLE BOLLARDS RESTORATION MOBILIZATION PATH SIGNING THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKINGS - LINE 12" THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKINGS - LINE 24" 6 X 12 BOX CULVERT FURNISH AND PLACE PREFABRICATED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE GUARDRAIL STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (ABUTMENTS) AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 10" BITUMINOUS MATERIALS (PRIME COAT) HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, 2" DETECTABLE WARNINGS PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE BIKE PATH, 5" THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKINGS - LINE 6" Preliminary Cost Estimate - All Sections (10,700 LF, 10' Wide) Kingsmill Street to Riverfront Park ITEM EARTH EXCAVATION GEOTECHNICAL FABRIC FOR GROUND STABILIZATION AGGREGATE SUBGRADE IMPROVEMENT 12" PERIMETER EROSION BARRIER JOB NO:YO1736-C DESIGNED:TVW, CMF DATE:October 3, 2017 PROJECT TITLE:Downtown Hill Landscaping CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE FROM HR GREEN (DATED: 11/11/2016)566,041.50$ ANTICIPATED PARTICIPATORY ITEMS FROM ABOVE CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 505,321.50$ ANTICIPATED NON-PARTICIPATORY ITEMS FROM ABOVE CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE 60,720.00$ TOTAL 566,041.50$ ENGINEERING FEES (20% ESTIMATE)113,210.00$ TOTAL PROJECT COST 679,251.50$ FEDERAL FUNDS 494,825.20$ LOCAL FUNDS 184,426.30$ TOTAL PROJECT COST 679,251.50$ ASSUMPTIONS: PROJECT IS ELIGIBLE FOR FUNDING PER IDOT. PROJECT WILL BE A CE 1 (STATE APPROVED CE) WITHOUT A PDR PROJECT WILL BE ON A STATE LETTING Preliminary Cost Estimate Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #11 Tracking Number PW 2017-74 Verizon Site Access Agreement Public Works Committee – October 17, 2017 Positive Approval Proposed site access agreement between Verizon and the City for 610 Tower Ln. For a proposed cell tower location. Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department Summary Before you is a proposed site access agreement with Verizon Wireless that would allow them to perform their due diligence on 610 Tower Ln. to see if the water tower is suitable for their needs as a cell tower. If the site fits their needs we will then negotiate a lease agreement which would come before you at a later time. The proposed site access agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s office. I have attached a mark-up and clean copy for your review. Background The City currently has 2 lease agreements with Verizon Wireless, the Grande Reserve water tower and the Wheaton Woods flag pole antenna. We also have a lease agreement with Sprint and 2 different lease agreements with internet providers. Verizon is looking to install equipment in the base of the water tower located on Tower Ln. and use the rings below the tank to position their arrays. This is becoming more common due to the fact that many water towers already have antennas and arrays on the top of the tower. If the site access agreement is approved the plans will be given to EEI for structural review before the project can proceed. During the review time, the city will be working with Verizon on the lease agreement. Once engineering is approved, the lease agreement will be brought forward for discussion. Recommendation I recommend approval of the site access agreement as proposed. I would ask that this be placed on the October 17, 2017 public works committee agenda for discussion. If you have any questions or need further information, please let me know. Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works CC: Bart Olson, Administrator Date: October 10, 2017 Subject: Verizon Site Access Agreement VZW Site ID: YVHS SITE ACCESS AGREEMENT This Site Access Agreement (this “Agreement”) is executed by Chicago SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (the “Licensee”), with a business address of 180 Washington Valley Road, Bedminster, NJ 07921, and United City of the Village of Yorkville (the “Licensor”) whose mailing address is 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. BACKGROUND As part of Licensee’s consideration of real property (the “Property”) located at 610 Tower Lane, Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as more fully described in Exhibit “A”, attached, for the placement, maintenance and use of a communications facility and appurtenant uses, the Licensor has agreed to grant to Licensee and other persons described herein, a license, to enter upon the Property to conduct activities to help Licensee assess the suitability of the Property for its intended use. These activities may include, among other things, environmental inspection, testing and sampling activities (“Site Investigations”) at the Property. The purpose of this Agreement is to enter into a site access license governing the Site Investigations that may be conducted by Licensee’s authorized agents, contractors, consultants and employees. Licensee and Licensor agree as follows: 1. Authority to Grant a License. Licensor represents that it has the authority to grant the access allowed by this Agreement and that there is no need to obtain the approval or consent of any other party. The Licensor hereby grants a license to Licensee to conduct the Site Investigation. 2. Access to Property and Licensor’s Consent. Licensor grants to Licensee and its agents, advisors, employees, consultants, representatives, and independent contractors, including environmental contractors and consultants hired directly or indirectly by Licensee (collectively, the “Licensee Representatives”), the right, of ingress to, egress from, and access under, above, and through, the Property for the purpose of performing the Site Investigation during Licensor’s normal business hours, Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. The Site Investigation may include, but is not necessarily limited to, activities intended to (1) review environmental, safety and health conditions;(2) conduct radio tests, including the placing of radio broadcast/receive equipment on the Property for necessary periods; (3) conduct physical, structural and geotechnical testing; and (4) perform boundary and other surveys. These activities may, among other things, include the collection and testing of samples of soil, water, building materials and other substances, as more specifically described in Exhibit “B”, attached hereto and incorporated herein. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Licensee Representatives may drill into the soil, remove reasonable amounts of soil, and perform other tests, actions, evaluations, procedures, and treatments to complete its investigations in the locations of Licensee’s proposed equipment installation identified on attached Exhibit “C”. The Licensee Representatives shall undertake all activities on the Property in compliance with all applicable laws and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to minimize any materials interference with Licensor’s business operations on the Property. The cost of all such VZW Site ID: YVHS 2 activities shall be the responsibility of Licensee (or the Licensee Representatives as arranged between the Licensee Representative and the Licensee) and not Licensor. 3. Advance Notice. Licensee or Licensee Representatives shall give Licensor at least forty- eight (48) hours advance notice, either orally (by telephone or in person) or by electronic message of a planned activity that can reasonably be expected to require invasive activities into the Property’s subsurface, including notice of the areas of the Property that are expected to be materially affected by any sampling, monitoring, installation, or similar action. Licensee Representatives shall cooperate with Licensor to schedule the activities so as to minimize the extent and duration of any interference with Licensor’s operations. Licensee shall not take any actions that unreasonably interrupt the normal operations of Licensor on the Property. Licensee further agrees that the Site Investigations shall not cause interference to the use or enjoyment of the Property by Licensor and any other parties or licensees located at the Property. 4. Installation, Sampling, and Removal. Licensor shall cooperate with the Licensee Representatives regarding all installation, monitoring, sampling, removal and related activities that Licensee Representatives desire to conduct on the Property. At the Licensor’s specific request, Licensee Representatives shall use commercially reasonable efforts to schedule its activities to avoid times of peak business activity on the Property. Licensee Representatives may use any electrical or other utility outlets or connections on the Property to conduct its activities. Licensee Representatives shall split all samples with Licensor upon Licensor’s request, so long as Licensor pays for any and all additional costs incurred by the Licensee Representatives in this regard. After completing the activities contemplated by this Agreement, Licensee or Licensee Representatives shall remove their equipment and restore any part of the Property that was affected by its activities to a condition that is reasonably similar to the condition of the Property at the time immediately preceding the commencement of said activities. 5. Indemnification. (a) Licensee shall indemnify and hold harmless Licensor for any penalties, damages or costs that result from the negligence or willful misconduct, misrepresentation or breach of warranty in this agreement by Licensee or Licensee representatives. (b) Licensor shall indemnify and hold harmless Licensee and Licensee Representatives for any penalties, damages or costs that result from the negligence or willful misconduct, misrepresentation or breach of warranty in this agreement by Licensor including any damages or injuries to Licensee Representatives persons and/or property which arise from or relate to any existing hazardous waste, pollutant or hazardous substance presence or release associated with or related to the Property. (c) The indemnification in this agreement shall only apply if prompt notice is provided to the indemnifying party. The indemnity is conditioned on the following: (i) the indemnifying party has the opportunity to fully manage any indemnified matter as it deems appropriate (including any required remediation or defense of claims) with employees, agents, contractors, consultants and attorneys of the indemnifying party’s choosing and (ii) the reasonable cooperation of any indemnified party (including the signing of any properly completed forms that will allow for the continued current use of the property). VZW Site ID: YVHS 3 (d) The site access granted to the Licensee and/or Licensee Representatives pursuant to this Agreement extends to any repair or restoration work required to remediate any damage to the Property that is indemnified pursuant to this Section. 6. Test Results. (a) Licensor understands and acknowledges that the environmental testing to be undertaken may create legal duties applicable to Licensor if conditions of pollution are discovered and that except to the extent required by law, neither Licensee nor Licensee Representatives have an obligation to report any test results or conditions to any party as a result of this Agreement. Licensee and Licensee Representatives will provide copies of test results to Licensor unless Licensor specifically requests, in writing, prior to the start of testing, not to receive the test results from Licensee’s review. Licensor acknowledges that these tests are performed for Licensee’s specific purposes and cannot be relied on by Licensor in any way as being accurate or sufficient for any purposes. Licensor agrees and acknowledges that it is not authorized to share, provide, disseminate, present, and/or make available the test results to any third party unless required by law. (b) In certain cases test results regarding the environmental conditions of the property may result in a reporting obligation specific to Licensee or Licensee Representatives. In any of those cases, Licensee or Licensee Representative shall, if reasonably possible, notify Licensor at least twenty four (24) hours prior to making the notification but in any case within seventy two (72) hours after making the notification to the appropriate agency. Licensor agrees that Licensee and Licensee Representatives bear no responsibility for the costs resulting from that reporting and that Licensee shall not become responsible for any conditions that it discovers during the Site Investigation. (c) Licensor acknowledges and agrees that any samples that are taken during the activities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement and any investigation-derived media (i.e., drill cuttings, well purge water) generated by the investigation may require off-site disposal based upon test results. Licensor agrees to execute all properly completed waste manifests or other documents required for proper disposal of test results. Licensor’s obligation to sign any properly completed waste manifests or other documents required for proper disposal survives this Agreement so long as those items that require disposal were generated pursuant to this Agreement. The cost of off-site disposal of media will be paid for by Licensee or the appropriate Licensee Representative, not Licensor. (d) Licensee may use the results of the Site Investigation as it deems appropriate and may share the results with third parties, including, but not necessarily limited to attorneys, consultants, contractors, employees and regulators. 7. Termination. This Agreement shall terminate automatically on the earlier of: (1) execution of a lease agreement for any part of the Property between Licensee and Licensor, or (2) a decision by Licensee that the site is unsuitable; or (3) one hundred twenty (120) days from the latter signature of this Agreement. 8. Waiver; Modification; Severability. An extension, amendment, modification, cancellation, or termination of this Agreement will be valid and effective only if it is in writing and signed by each party to this Agreement, except as provided otherwise in this Agreement. In addition, a waiver VZW Site ID: YVHS 4 of any duty, obligation, or responsibility of a party under this Agreement will be valid and effective only if it is evidenced by a writing signed by, or on behalf of, the party against whom the waiver or discharge is sought to be enforced. Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement should be construed and interpreted so that it is valid and enforceable under applicable law. However, if a provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, that provision will be deemed severable from the remaining provisions of this Agreement and will not affect the validity, interpretation, or effect of the other provisions of this Agreement or the application of that provision to other circumstances in which it is valid and enforceable. 9. Assignment; Third Party Beneficiaries. Neither the entry of this Agreement or any action taken by Licensee hereunder shall create any third party beneficiary or third party beneficiary rights. 10. Legal Matters. The validity, construction, enforcement, and interpretation of this Agreement are governed by the laws of the State where the Property is located and the federal laws of the United States of America. 11. Notices. Except for oral notices specifically authorized in this agreement, notices permitted by this Agreement will be valid only if such notice is in writing, delivered personally or by e-mail, telecopy, commercial courier, or first class, postage prepaid, United States mail (whether or not certified or registered and regardless of whether a return receipt is requested or received by the sender), and addressed by the sender to the intended recipient at its address set forth in the first paragraph of this Agreement, or to such other address as the intended recipient may designate by notice given to the sender in accordance with this section. A validly given notice, consent, demand, request, or approval will be effective on the earlier of its receipt, if delivered personally or by e-mail, telecopy, or commercial courier, or the third day after it is postmarked by the United States Postal Service, if delivered by first class, postage prepaid, United States mail. Each party promptly shall notify the other of any change in its mailing address or telephone contact number stated in this Agreement. 12. Complete Agreement; Survival. This Agreement records the entire understanding between the parties regarding the subjects addressed in it and supersedes any previous or contemporaneous agreement, understanding, or representation, oral or written, by either of them. 13. Execution and Effectiveness. The parties may execute this Agreement in counterparts. Each executed counterpart will constitute an original document, and all executed counterparts, together, will constitute the same agreement. This Agreement will become effective upon the last signatory’s delivery of the fully executed document to the other party, and the last signatory shall fill in the EXECUTED date below prior to such delivery. VZW Site ID: YVHS 5 EXECUTED: ______________, 2016. LICENSOR: United City of the Village of Yorkville By: ________________________________ Print Name: _________________________ Title: _______________________________ Date: _______________________________ LICENSEE: Chicago SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless By: Cellco Partnership, its general partner By: ________________________________ Print Name: _________________________ Title: ___________________________ Date: _______________________________ The undersigned “Licensee Representative” has reviewed this Agreement and hereby agrees to comply with all obligations pertaining to, and imposed on, Licensee Representatives contained herein. Agreed to and accepted by: EBI Consulting By: Name: _____________________________________ Title: ______________________________________ Date: VZW Site ID: YVHS 6 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PARCEL OF LAND IN KENDALL COUNTY, STATE OF ILLINOIS, AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN DEED DOC# 164595 AND DEED DOC# 73-3386 , ID# 02-28-351-011, BEING KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS METES AND BOUNDS PROPERTY. VZW Site ID: YVHS 7 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF WORK LEAD PAINT SURVEY Physical sampling of representative suspect lead-containing painted on the water tower will be conducted. The proposed scope of work includes the collection of up to two (2) paint chip samples. Samples will be analyzed by a state licensed laboratory for total lead content by the Flame Atomic Absorption EPA method SW846-7420 and reported as dry weight concentration in parts per million (ppm) and/or micrograms per gram (ug/g). LIMITED LEAD-IN-SOIL SAMPLING The scope of services presented herein includes collection of up to three (3) soil samples and subsequent laboratory analysis for lead content within Verizon’s proposed lease area and easements. Soil samples will be collected from representative areas of the Project Site, from a depth of less than one foot below the ground surface, using a hand soil-boring tool or a garden shovel. Samples will be analyzed by a state licensed laboratory. All samples will be analyzed for total lead content by the Flame Atomic Absorption EPA method SW846-7420 and reported as dry weight concentration in parts per million (ppm) and/or micrograms per gram (ug/g). One sample will be analyzed for Lead via Toxicity Characterization Leaching Procedure (TCLP) EPA method SW846-1311/7420 and reported as concentration in ppm and milligrams per Liter (mg/L). VZW Site ID: YVHS 8 VZW Site ID: YVHS SITE ACCESS AGREEMENT This Site Access Agreement (this “Agreement”) is executed by [Enter name of entity seeking access] d/b/a Verizon Wireless (the “Licensee”), with a business address of 180 Washington Valley Road, Bedminster, NJ 07921, and United City of the Village of Yorkville (the “Licensor”) whose mailing address is 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. BACKGROUND As part of Licensee’s consideration of real property (the “Property”) located at 610 Tower Lane, Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as more fully described in Exhibit “A”, attached, for the placement, maintenance and use of a communications facility and appurtenant uses, the Licensor has agreed to grant to Licensee and other persons described herein, a license, to enter upon the Property to conduct activities to help Licensee assess the suitability of the Property for its intended use. These activities may include, among other things, environmental inspection, testing and sampling activities (“Site Investigations”) at the Property. The purpose of this Agreement is to enter into a site access license governing the Site Investigations that may be conducted by Licensee’s authorized agents, contractors, consultants and employees. Licensee and Licensor agree as follows: 1. Authority to Grant a License. Licensor represents that it has the authority to grant the access allowed by this Agreement and that there is no need to obtain the approval or consent of any other party. The Licensor hereby grants a license to Licensee to conduct the Site Investigation. 2. Access to Property and Licensor’s Consent. Licensor grants to Licensee and its agents, advisors, employees, consultants, representatives, and independent contractors, including environmental contractors and consultants hired directly or indirectly by Licensee (collectively, the “Licensee Representatives”), the right, but not the obligation, of ingress to, egress from, and access under, above, and through, the Property for the purpose of performing the Site Investigation. The Site Investigation may include, but is not necessarily limited to, activities intended to (1) review environmental, safety and health conditions;(2) conduct radio tests, including the placing of radio broadcast/receive equipment on the Property for necessary periods; (3) conduct physical, structural and geotechnical testing; and (4) perform boundary and other surveys. These activities may, among other things, include the collection and testing of samples of soil, water, building materials and other substances. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Licensee Representatives may drill into the soil, drill through pavement, remove reasonable amounts of soil, install and sample monitoring wells, and perform other tests, actions, evaluations, procedures, and treatments to complete its investigations. The Licensee Representatives shall undertake all activities on the Property in compliance with all applicable laws and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to minimize the extent and duration of any interference with Licensor’s business operations on the Property. The cost of all such activities shall be the responsibility of Licensee (or the Licensee Representatives as arranged between the Licensee Representative and the Licensee) and not Licensor. Comment [ed1]: What kind of testing and sampling, please explain. Comment [ed2]: During normal business hours which are M-F 7:00am-3:30pm Comment [ed3]: Only in city approved areas. We have far too many pipes in the ground to have a broad grid soil test. VZW Site ID: YVHS 2 3. Advance Notice. Licensee or Licensee Representatives shall give Licensor at least twenty four (24) hours advance notice, either orally (by telephone or in person) or by electronic message of a planned activity that can reasonably be expected to require invasive activities into the Property’s subsurface, including notice of the areas of the Property that are expected to be materially affected by any sampling, monitoring, installation, or similar action. Licensee Representatives shall cooperate with Licensor to schedule the activities so as to minimize the extent and duration of any interference with Licensor’s operations. 4. Installation, Sampling, and Removal. Licensor shall cooperate with the Licensee Representatives regarding all installation, monitoring, sampling, removal and related activities that Licensee Representatives desire to conduct on the Property. Licensor shall cooperate in locating buried utilities and improvements on the Property at the request of Licensee Representative and shall assist the Licensee Representatives in avoiding impacts to such buried or concealed features. At the Licensor’s specific request, Licensee Representatives shall use commercially reasonable efforts to schedule its activities to avoid times of peak business activity on the Property. Licensor authorizes Licensee Representatives to obstruct temporarily, but for a reasonable period of time, access to, or use of, limited areas of the Property to conduct Site Investigations. Licensee Representatives may use any electrical or other utility outlets or connections on the Property to conduct its activities. Licensee Representatives shall split all samples with Licensor upon Licensor’s request, so long as Licensor pays for any and all additional costs incurred by the Licensee Representatives in this regard. After completing the activities contemplated by this Agreement, Licensee or Licensee Representatives shall remove their equipment and restore any part of the Property that was affected by its activities to a condition that is reasonably similar to the condition of the Property at the time immediately preceding the commencement of said activities. 5. Indemnification. (a) Licensee shall indemnify and hold harmless Licensor for any penalties, damages or costs that result from the negligence or willful misconduct, misrepresentation or breach of warranty in this agreement by Licensee or Licensee representatives. (b) Licensor shall indemnify and hold harmless Licensee and Licensee Representatives for any penalties, damages or costs that result from the negligence or willful misconduct, misrepresentation or breach of warranty in this agreement by Licensor including any damages or injuries to Licensee Representatives persons and/or property which arise from or relate to any existing hazardous waste, pollutant or hazardous substance presence or release associated with or related to the Property. (c) The indemnification in this agreement shall only apply if prompt notice is provided to the indemnifying party. The indemnity is conditioned on the following: (i) the indemnifying party has the opportunity to fully manage any indemnified matter as it deems appropriate (including any required remediation or defense of claims) with employees, agents, contractors, consultants and attorneys of the indemnifying party’s choosing and (ii) the reasonable cooperation of any indemnified party (including the signing of any properly completed forms that will allow for the continued current use of the property). Comment [ed4]: 48 hour notice. Comment [ed5]: To the extent to which they do not interfere with the day to day activities of the public works department. Comment [ed6]: Licensee shall abide by all State laws in regards to using the JULIE one call system for underground utility location. Comment [ed7]: No limiting or cutting off access to any parts of our site. our site is very small and it is all a vital part of our operations Comment [ed8]: The same or better VZW Site ID: YVHS 3 (d) The site access granted to the Licensee and/or Licensee Representatives pursuant to this Agreement extends to any repair or restoration work required to remediate any damage to the Property that is indemnified pursuant to this Section. 6. Test Results. (a) Licensor understands and acknowledges that the environmental testing to be undertaken may create legal duties applicable to Licensor if conditions of pollution are discovered and that except to the extent required by law, neither Licensee nor Licensee Representatives have an obligation to report any test results or conditions to any party as a result of this Agreement. Licensee and Licensee Representatives will provide copies of test results to Licensor unless Licensor specifically requests, in writing, prior to the start of testing, not to receive the test results from Licensee’s review. Licensor acknowledges that these tests are performed for Licensee’s specific purposes and cannot be relied on by Licensor in any way as being accurate or sufficient for any purposes. Licensor agrees and acknowledges that it is not authorized to share, provide, disseminate, present, and/or make available the test results to any third party unless required by law. (b) In certain cases test results regarding the environmental conditions of the property may result in a reporting obligation specific to Licensee or Licensee Representatives. In any of those cases, Licensee or Licensee Representative shall, if reasonably possible, notify Licensor at least twenty four (24) hours prior to making the notification but in any case within seventy two (72) hours after making the notification to the appropriate agency. Licensor agrees that Licensee and Licensee Representatives bear no responsibility for the costs resulting from that reporting and that Licensee shall not become responsible for any conditions that it discovers during the Site Investigation. (c) Licensor acknowledges and agrees that any samples that are taken during the activities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement and any investigation-derived media (i.e., drill cuttings, well purge water) generated by the investigation may require off-site disposal based upon test results. Licensor agrees to execute all properly completed waste manifests or other documents required for proper disposal of test results. Licensor’s obligation to sign any properly completed waste manifests or other documents required for proper disposal survives this Agreement so long as those items that require disposal were generated pursuant to this Agreement. The cost of off-site disposal of media will be paid for by Licensee or the appropriate Licensee Representative, not Licensor. (d) Licensee may use the results of the Site Investigation as it deems appropriate and may share the results with third parties, including, but not necessarily limited to attorneys, consultants, contractors, employees and regulators. 7. Termination. This Agreement shall terminate automatically on the earlier of: (1) execution of a lease agreement for any part of the Property between Licensee and Licensor, or (2) a decision by Licensee that the site is unsuitable. 8. Waiver; Modification; Severability. An extension, amendment, modification, cancellation, or termination of this Agreement will be valid and effective only if it is in writing and signed by each party to this Agreement, except as provided otherwise in this Agreement. In addition, a waiver of any duty, obligation, or responsibility of a party under this Agreement will be valid and effective Comment [ed9]: (3) or 120 days, whichever comes first. VZW Site ID: YVHS 4 only if it is evidenced by a writing signed by, or on behalf of, the party against whom the waiver or discharge is sought to be enforced. Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement should be construed and interpreted so that it is valid and enforceable under applicable law. However, if a provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, that provision will be deemed severable from the remaining provisions of this Agreement and will not affect the validity, interpretation, or effect of the other provisions of this Agreement or the application of that provision to other circumstances in which it is valid and enforceable. 9. Assignment; Third Party Beneficiaries. Neither the entry of this Agreement or any action taken by Licensee hereunder shall create any third party beneficiary or third party beneficiary rights. 10. Legal Matters. The validity, construction, enforcement, and interpretation of this Agreement are governed by the laws of the State where the Property is located and the federal laws of the United States of America. 11. Notices. Except for oral notices specifically authorized in this agreement, notices permitted by this Agreement will be valid only if such notice is in writing, delivered personally or by e-mail, telecopy, commercial courier, or first class, postage prepaid, United States mail (whether or not certified or registered and regardless of whether a return receipt is requested or received by the sender), and addressed by the sender to the intended recipient at its address set forth in the first paragraph of this Agreement, or to such other address as the intended recipient may designate by notice given to the sender in accordance with this section. A validly given notice, consent, demand, request, or approval will be effective on the earlier of its receipt, if delivered personally or by e-mail, telecopy, or commercial courier, or the third day after it is postmarked by the United States Postal Service, if delivered by first class, postage prepaid, United States mail. Each party promptly shall notify the other of any change in its mailing address or telephone contact number stated in this Agreement. 12. Complete Agreement; Survival. This Agreement records the entire understanding between the parties regarding the subjects addressed in it and supersedes any previous or contemporaneous agreement, understanding, or representation, oral or written, by either of them. 13. Execution and Effectiveness. The parties may execute this Agreement in counterparts. Each executed counterpart will constitute an original document, and all executed counterparts, together, will constitute the same agreement. This Agreement will become effective upon the last signatory’s delivery of the fully executed document to the other party, and the last signatory shall fill in the EXECUTED date below prior to such delivery. VZW Site ID: YVHS 5 EXECUTED: ______________, 2016. LICENSOR: United City of the Village of Yorkville By: ________________________________ Print Name: _________________________ Title: _______________________________ Date: _______________________________ LICENSEE: Chicago SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless By: Cellco Partnership, its general partner By: ________________________________ Print Name: _________________________ Title: ___________________________ Date: _______________________________ The undersigned “Licensee Representative” has reviewed this Agreement and hereby agrees to comply with all obligations pertaining to, and imposed on, Licensee Representatives contained herein. Agreed to and accepted by: By: Name: _____________________________________ Title: ______________________________________ Date: VZW Site ID: YVHS 6 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALL THAT PARCEL OF LAND IN KENDALL COUNTY, STATE OF ILLINOIS, AS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN DEED DOC# 164595 AND DEED DOC# 73-3386 , ID# 02-28-351-011, BEING KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS METES AND BOUNDS PROPERTY. Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Old Business #1 Tracking Number PW 2017-63 Water Ordinance Public Works Committee – October 17, 2017 Majority Approval See attached memo. Erin Willrett Administration Name Department Summary Attached you will find the staff recommended revisions to the City’s Codified Ordinance Title 7 Chapter 5 Water Use and Service. Staff began meeting to revise this Chapter in the Fall of 2016 and reviewed it section by section. Engineering and Legal has also reviewed the recommended changes. Update At the September 26, 2017 City Council meeting two questions were asked. One of the questions was regarding the vacant dwelling policy, commonly referred to as the “snow bird policy”. The other question was regarding the City’s authority to shut-off water to multi-unit buildings. The 2 items are summarized below. The vacant dwelling unit policy language is contained in Title 7, Chapter 7 “Utility Billing” of the City’s Codified Ordinance. Ordinance No. 2015-01 is attached for your use. The proposed revisions are limited to Title 7, Chapter 5 “Water Use and Service”. Therefore, the vacant dwelling policy is not proposed to be changed at this time. The second question relating to the City’s authority to shut-off water to multi-unit buildings has been looked into further by staff. There are approximately 69 multi-unit buildings with a total of 891dwelling units that are currently listed in the landlord’s name. If the landlord refuses to pay the entire building’s utility bill, the City has the authority currently to shut-off service to the entire building. This is the City’s current practice and there is no recommendation to change this current practice. However, there are approximately 7 multi-unit buildings with 23 dwelling units that have multiple people owning the units within each building and only have 1 shut-off for the entire building. Currently, the City cannot shut-off the entire building. The proposed language would allow the City authority to shut-off an entire building if 1 owner out of many is not paying. This would allow the City to take adverse action in an extreme scenario. There are approximately 20 multi-unit buildings with 86 dwelling units that have 1 single landlord, but multiple water tenant accounts within each building and only have 1 shut-off for the entire building. Currently, the City cannot shut-off the entire building. The proposed language would allow the City authority to shut-off an entire building if 1 owner out many is not paying. Staff proposes to notify the owner of the building and force them to transition to a landlord account in the next year (12 months). This would allow the landlords adequate time to decide how to transition the water tenant accounts and would prevent issues in the future of having to shut-off an entire building for 1 owner that is non-compliant. This would require the landlord to be responsible for the entire building. Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: October 17, 2017 Subject: Revision to Title 7 Chapter 5 Water Use and Service Currently, out of the 27 multi-unit buildings listed there are only a handful of problem buildings. Attached is a spreadsheet listing the units described above. The proposed language would prevent future abuse of City utilities. Staff maintains the original recommendation for approval of the attached revision to Title 7 Chapter 5 Water Use and Service to the City’s Codified Ordinances. Background The red-lined version is attached for your reference. A lot of the changes are updates to match the current practice of the department or to match current legislation. A few key revisions from the Ordinance are listed below:  Throughout the document staff added a reference to the most recent City Subdivision Control Ordinance for a specification reference.  All references to the Superintendent of Public Works have been changed to the Director of Public Works.  All references to the City Treasurer have been changed to the Finance Director.  Bulk Water has been updated from $5.00 to $50.00 per load.  Staff updated the Residential Connection Fee table as outlined in the Master Water Study that EEI authored. This assumes a cost calculated of $1,587.00 per PE from the previous calculation of $1,057.00 per PE.  Changing the water meter testing threshold to meters that are at two percent accuracy, instead of four percent so that more accurate reads can be made.  Proposed change to multi-unit buildings, mandating that each unit must be serviced by a single meter. In the case that that is not feasible, if there are delinquent accounts in the multi-unit building, the entire building may be shut-off, if it is attached by one meter to all units.  Updated the turn-on fee to $50.00 (currently $5.00). This is an accurate reflection of staff time and transportation costs to turn-off/turn-on a unit that had been disconnected. A comparison from current to proposed language is listed below for your use. Several sections have been modified and a side-by-side comparison is used. Proposed Change 1  Section 7-5-1: Water Department: CURRENT LANGUAGE A. Supervision: The Water Department of the City shall be under the active supervision of the city administrator/engineer who shall report to the Public Works Committee the water committee of the city council. Said city administrator/engineer shall make a written report to the City Council of all his acts and doings whenever requested by the Council and such reports shall be placed on file with the City Clerk and shall show the kind and amount of materials used, the cost thereof and all expenses attending the work. He shall also keep a correct map of all water mains now or hereinafter laid in the City, with their dimensions, locations and connections, hydrants and cutoffs; and shall keep just, true and correct books of accounts, and such book, records, maps and other accounts shall be delivered to his successor or the City Council at any time, upon request. PROPOSED LANGUAGE A. Supervision: The Water Department of the City shall be under the supervision of the Director of Public Works who shall report to the City Council the activities of the Department whenever requested by the Council. He shall also keep a correct map of all watermains in the City, with their dimensions, locations and connection, hydrants and cutoffs; and shall keep such books, records, maps and other accounts, which shall be delivered to his successor. Proposed Change 2  Section 7-5-1: Water Department: CURRENT LANGUAGE B. 1. Salaries and Wages: Superintendent of Public Works: The Superintendent of Public Works shall receive his wages from the water fund for his services in the active supervision of said waterworks; such sum to be the current compensation policies fixed by resolution and set forth in the annual budget ordinance. PROPOSED LANGUAGE B. 1. Salaries and Wages: Director of Public Works: The Director of Public Works may receive his wages from the water fund for his services in the active supervision of said waterworks; such sum to be determined by the current City compensation policies. Proposed Change 3  Section 7-5-1: Water Department: CURRENT LANGUAGE B. 2. Department Employees: The mayor and members of the city council shall have the authority to hire all other employees necessary for the proper operation and management of the waterworks. The wages of all such employees shall be fixed by resolution, and all wages and other expenses of the water department shall be paid out of the water fund through vouchers authorized and drawn in the like manner all other vouchers; except that such amounts shall be paid only out of the water fund. PROPOSED LANGUAGE B. 2. Department Employees: The Mayor, or his designee, shall have the authority to hire and fire all other employees necessary for the proper operation and management of the waterworks, all wages and other expenses of the water department may be paid out of the water fund in accordance with the budget as approved by the City Council. Proposed Change 4  Section 7-5-1: Water Department: PROPOSED DELETION C. Audit of Department: The City Council shall cause a proper audit to be made at least once each year of the Water Department. The report of such audit shall be open for inspection at all proper times to any taxpayer, water user or any holder of bonds issued by the Water Department. Staff note - The audit is done annually for all City accounts. This language is redundant and therefore, proposed to be deleted. Proposed Change 5  Section 7-5-2: Applications for Water Service and Connections CURRENT LANGUAGE All applications for water service connections and for water service shall be made in writing on forms to be furnished by the City. No approval for water service connection shall be granted unless and until said forms are filled out and signed by the applicant and until all fees for connection and meter are submitted. PROPOSED LANGUAGE All applications for water service connections and for water service shall be made in writing on forms to be furnished by the City. No approval for water service connection shall be granted unless and until said forms are completed and signed by the applicant with all fees for connection and meter. No connection to a water main shall be made without a permit being issued and 24 hour notice to the Director of Public Works. No water from the city water supply shall be turned on for service into any premises by any person until the water meter has been installed and is registering all water used at the premises. Staff note - This language is clear and implicit when it comes to connections and who is allowed to turn on the water service. Proposed Change 6  Section 7-5-3: Water Service Connections and Installation PROPOSED DELETION A: “Projected PE Per Residence” Staff note - The City has already considered this within the calculation and is listed as a total in the chart below. Therefore, staff is recommending removing the number from the chart and only listing the Proposed Connection Fee. Proposed Change 7  Section 7-5-3: Water Service Connections and Installation PROPOSED AMENDED RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION FEE TABLE: Staff updated Residential Connection Fee table as outlined in the Master Water Study that EEI authored. This assumes a cost calculated of $1,587.00 per PE from the previous calculation of $1,057.00 per PE. The columns in the table below in black are proposed to be deleted to show the new PROPOSED cost calculated. The study recommends the new calculation shown, which is based on a portion of total cost based off of Average Daily Demand. See image below of the calculations and assumption from the Master Water Study. For example, a Single Family Home is CURRENTLY calculated by 3.5 PE multiplied by the Current Fee of $1,057.00 which would equal a Connection Fee of $3,700.00. Staff is PROPOSING the calculation for a Single Family Home by calculating the same 3.5 PE multiplied by the Proposed Connection Fee of $1,587.00 which would equal a Connection Fee of $5,554.00. The proposed increase is $1,854.00 (33.3%) for a Single Family Home. RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION FEES Residence Type PE/Type Current Fee * PE Current Connection Fee PROPOSED Fee * PE PROPOSED Connection Fee Efficiency or studio apartment 1 $1,057.00 $1,057.00 $1,587.00 $1,587.00 1 bedroom apartment/condominium 1.5 $1,057.00 $1,586.00 $1,587.00 $2,380.00 2 plus bedroom apartment/condominium 3 $1,057.00 $3,171.00 $1,587.00 $4,761.00 1 bedroom townhome 1.5 $1,057.00 $1,586.00 $1,587.00 $2,380.00 2 plus bedroom townhome 3 $1,057.00 $3,171.00 $1,587.00 $4,761.00 Duplex home 3 $1,057.00 $3,700.00 $1,587.00 $4,761.00 Single-family home 3.5 $1,057.00 $3,700.00 $1,587.00 $5,554.00 Proposed Change 8  Section7-5-3: Water Service Connections and Installation CURRENT LANGUAGE Item B Materials, Equipment and Labor 1. If the superintendent of public works so desires, he may request the applicant furnish materials, equipment and labor to install the service connection. Where such the request is made the materials used shall be approved by the Superintendent of public works and the installer shall be bonded, qualified and approved by the Superintendent of Public Works before installation. If the Superintendent of Public Works provides any materials, equipment and labor to install the service connection, the cost of such equipment, materials and labor for this installation of such connections shall be in additional to the above charges. PROPOSED LANGUAGE Item B Materials, Equipment and Labor 1. The applicant shall furnish materials, equipment and labor to install the service connection. The materials used shall be in compliance with this Chapter and approved by the Director of Public Works and the installer shall be bonded, qualified as a licensed plumber and approved by the Director of Public Works before installation. If the Director of Public Works provides any materials, equipment and labor to install the service connection, the cost of such equipment, materials and labor for the installation of such connections shall be in addition to the above charges. Proposed Change 9  Section 7-5-3: Water Service Connections and Installation PROPOSED DELETION Item B Materials, Equipment and Labor 2. “The installation of the service connection by applicant shall be allowed only where connection will be made to the new watermains that are not yet in service. Where connection is made to existing city owned watermains, the installation of the service connection shall be made by the superintendent.” Staff Note - That language does not represent current practice as the connection is not made by the Superintendent. This language was deleted in its entirety. Proposed Change 9  Section 7-5-4: Water Meters CURRENT LANGUAGE All water furnished consumers shall be metered, and all meters shall be of a standard and approved make and shall be furnished by the City and set by the Water Department. Meters shall remain the property of the City and are subject to removal any time. PROPOSED LANGUAGE All water furnished consumers shall be metered, and all meters shall be in compliance with this Chapter, and shall be furnished by the City and set by the Water Department or licensed plumber. Meters shall remain the property of the City and are subject to removal any time. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to furnish protection to the water meter from theft, vandalism, breakage due to weather conditions or any other damages which may occur. The property owner will be required to pay for any repair to or replacement costs of the water meter if such is necessary (for other than normal maintenance); otherwise, the water meter is the responsibility of the Department of Public Works for accuracy and maintenance, and/or replacement.” Staff Note - This language clearly defines who is monetarily responsible for repair or replacement of the meter. Proposed Change 10  Section 7-5-4-5: Meter Testing PROPOSED LANGUAGE A. Tests May be Made: “In case of doubt as to the accuracy of a meter, the consumer may request a text to be made….and if the meter is found to measure more than TWO (2%) incorrectly, no charge shall be made; and if an over-register of more than TWO percent (2%) is found….If said meter registers within TWO percent (2%) of accuracy, then all expense of testing shall be borne of the person making the request.” Staff Note – The proposed language above is the same as the current language, except that staff recommends the percentage change from FOUR to TWO percent to gain more accuracy to meter reads. Proposed Change 11  Section 7-5-4-7: Service to More than One Customer Through Single Meter: CURRENT LANGUAGE If, at the request of and for the convenience of the owner of a premises containing more than one customer, water is furnished to said premises through a single meter for the purpose of redistribution to the several customers, the charged set forth for service for a single family meter shall be multiplied by the number of customers served and the product there from shall be the water service connection charge. PROPOSED LANGUAGE SERVICE TO MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WITH ONLY A SINGLE METER OR SHUT-OFF: A. If water is furnished to a multi-family building through a single meter for the purpose of redistribution to the several customers, the water service connection charge shall be the charge for a single-family meter multiplied by the number of customers served. B. No new water service shall be provided by the City to a multi-family building unless each single-family dwelling unit has a separate meter and shutoff box. It is the expressed policy of the City to prevent the establishment of and to encourage the elimination of all multi-family buildings with only a single meter or shutoff box except as allowed in this section. C. Effective August 1, 2018, service to a multi-family building with a single meter or shutoff box shall be billed only in the name of the landlord/owner or his or her duly appointed agent until such water service is exclusive to each single-family dwelling unit with meter and shutoff box. Agents appointed to act for the landlord/owner must be identified and authorized in writing to the City by the landlord/owner. The landlord/owner may also be a person, partnership or corporate entity lawfully designated as being solely responsible for the payment of water service to the City. D. Whenever a disconnection is authorized for a multi-family building with a single meter or shutoff box, water service shall not be reconnected until a separate shutoff box and meter is installed for each single-family dwelling unit at the landlord/owner’s expense. Staff Note - This language allows the City to have access to shut-off and/or turn-on in individual residences in a multi-family dwelling unit. Proposed Change 12  Section 7-5-5-1: Water Service Rates and Charges: Staff Note – We changed the location of bulk water rates by moving those charges to this section of the ordinance under a new Section D, and stipulated that the bulk water rate is $50 per load. Proposed Change 13  Section 7-5-5-1: Water Service Rates and Charges: PROPOSED DELETION D. Temporary Water use; Unmetered Rates: The flat rate for water services supplied on a temporary basis without meters shall be as follow. Staff Note - This was removed because the practice is no longer in place, allowing all to purchase a bulk water rate. Proposed Change 14  Section 7-5-5-1: Water Service Rates and Charges: PROPOSED DELETION E. “Private Sprinkler and Fire Suppression Systems” Staff Note - This is an old practice and is no longer in use. Proposed Changes 15. 16, 17 & 18  Section 7-5-5-2: Bills for Service; Delinquencies: PROPOSED LANGUAGE A. First notice bills for water furnished shall be mailed on or about January 1, March 1, July 1, September 1, and November 1 of each year. Staff Note – This language reflects current practice, outlining the notice for bill dates (every other month starting in January). PROPOSED LANGUAGE B. After 30 days from the mailing of the first bill and the bill not being paid a delinquent second notice bill shall be mailed. Staff Note – This will allow the second notice to be mailed 30 days from the mailing of the first bill not being paid. PROPOSED MODIFICATION C. Turn-on fee increase from a $5.00 to a $50.00 fee. Staff Note - Staff believes this accurately reflects the charge for administration and labor time for the turn on. PROPOSED DELETION Section D. “Additional Deposit Required” Staff Note - It is not the current practice to require an additional deposit for a delinquent user. Proposed Change 19  Section 7-5-5-3: Responsibility of Water Service Customer: PROPOSED ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE: If the bill for a building with multiple units and a single meter with one owner who pays the bill for all of the units is delinquent, the City may shut-off the entire building as provided in Section 7-5-5-2C. Staff Note - This would only affect a multiple-unit building, as it would provide a way for the staff to shut-off the building for delinquent payment. And also links to the shut-off access described in Section 7-5-4-7. Proposed Change 20  Section 7-5-6: Waterworks Revenue: PROPOSED DELETION C. – “Water Surplus Account and Water Bond Redemption Account” Staff Note - These accounts are no longer active and do not apply. Proposed Change 21  Section 7-5-7: Change of Residence By Water Service Customers: PROPOSED MODIFICATION Turn-on fee increase from a $5.00 to a $50.00 fee. Staff Note - Staff believes this accurately reflects the charge for administration and labor time for the turn on. Proposed Change 22  Section 7-5-9: Prohibited Acts and Conditions: CURRENT LANGUAGE B. Unnecessary Waste of Water: Consumers shall prevent unnecessary waste of water and keep all water outlets closed when not in actual use. If unnecessary waste of water takes place, the City Council reserves the right to cut-off the supply, and City further reserves the right to prohibit the use of water for yard sprinklers, elevators and large consumers of water when, in the judgment of the Council, it shall be necessary to do so. PROPOSED LANGUAGE B. It shall be the duty of all consumers of city water, at any times, to exercise due diligence to prevent waste of the water supply and to this end shall stop any leaks on their premises. The city water supply will be shut-off from any and all premises until such violation of this rule is corrected. Proposed Change 23  Section 7-5-9: Prohibited Acts and Conditions: PROPOSED ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE C. 5.: Resale of Water Prohibited: No water shall be resold or distributed by the recipient thereof from the City supply to any premises at a rate other than that charged by the City. A person who resells water from the City supply shall not add any additional costs or charges to the rate charged by the City, other than any applicable administrative fee. The billing statement shall include any applicable administrative fee as a separate line item on the bill. The line item for the administrative fee shall also include the name of the entity that is charging the fee. Any billing statement for water resale shall solely be in the name of the reseller or his or her assigns. The billing statement shall not include any references to the City or the City’s logo. Proposed Change 24  Section 7-5-9: Prohibited Acts and Conditions: PROPOSED ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE C. 6.: Damage to or Tampering with System: It is unlawful for any person not authorized by the Director of Public Works to tamper with, alter, or injure any part of the City’s waterworks or supply system or any meter. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the attached revision to Title 7 Chapter 5 Water Use and Service to the City’s Codified Ordinances. Title 7 Chapter 5 WATER USE AND SERVICE 7-5-1: WATER DEPARTMENT: 7-5-2: APPLICATIONS FOR WATER SERVICE AND CONNECTIONS: 7-5-3: WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND INSTALLATIONS: 7-5-4: WATER METERS: 7-5-4-1: METER COSTS: 7-5-4-2: METER LOCATIONS: 7-5-4-3: SIZE OF METERS: 7-5-4-4: MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR: 7-5-4-5: METER TESTING: 7-5-4-6: READING METERS: 7-5-4-7: SERVICE TO MORE THAN ONE CUSTOMER THROUGH SINGLE METER: 7-5-5: WATER SERVICE RATES; BILLING PROCEDURES: 7-5-5-1: WATER SERVICE RATES AND CHARGES: 7-5-5-2: BILLS FOR SERVICE; DELINQUENCIES: 7-5-5-3: RESPONSIBILITY OF WATER SERVICE CUSTOMER; DEPOSIT: 7-5-6: WATERWORKS REVENUE: 7-5-7: CHANGE OF RESIDENCE BY WATER SERVICE CUSTOMERS: 7-5-8: WATER SHUTOFFS AND TURNONS: 7-5-9: PROHIBITED ACTS AND CONDITIONS: 7-5-10: TEMPORARY SERVICE TO CONTRACTORS: 7-5-11: REGULATIONS FOR DEVELOPERS: 7-5-12: PRIVATE SPRINKLER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS: 7-5-13: WATER CUSTOMER CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT: 7-5-14: VIOLATION AND PENALTY (REP. BY ORD. 2008-74, 8-26-2008): 7-5-15: WATER CONSERVATION REGULATIONS: 7-5-16: INSPECTION; AUDIT; APPEAL: 7-5-1: WATER DEPARTMENT: A. Supervision: The Water Department of the City shall be under the active supervision of the the city administrator/engineer Director of Public Works who shall report to the PUlic Works Committee the water committee of the city council. who.Said city administrator/engineer Said Director shall make a written report to the City Council the activities of the Departmentof all his acts and doings whenever requested by the Council, and such reports shall be placed on file with the City Clerk and shall show the kind and amount of materials used, the cost thereof and all expenses attending the work. He shall also keep a correct map of all water mains now or hereinafter laid in the City, with their dimensions, locations and connections, hydrants and cutoffs; and shall keep just, true and correct books of accounts, and such books, records, maps and other accounts which shall be delivered to his successor or the City Council at any time, upon request. B. Salaries And Wages: 1. Superintendent Director Oof Public Works: The Superintendent Director of Public Works shall may receive his wages from the water fund for his services in the active supervision of said waterworks; such sum to be determined by the current City compensation policies. compensation policies fixed by resolution and set forth in the annual budget ordinance. (Ord 1974, 69, 10 24 1974; and 19953 Code). 2. Department Employees: The mayor and members of the city council The Mayor, or his designee, shall have the authority to hire and fire all other employees necessary for the proper operation and management of the waterworks, The wages of all such employees shall be fixed by resolution, and all wages and other expenses of the water department mayshall be paid out of the water fund through vouchers authorized and drawn in the like manner s all other vouchers; except that such amounts shall be paid only out of the water fund. in accordance with the budget as approved by the City Council. C. Audit Of Department: The City Council shall cause a proper audit to be made at least once each year of the Water Department. The report of such audit shall be open for inspection at all proper times to any taxpayer, water user or any holder of bonds issued by the Water Department. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-1974) 7-5-2: APPLICATIONS FOR WATER SERVICE AND CONNECTIONS: All applications for water service connections and for water service shall be made in writing on forms to be furnished by the City. No approval for water service connection shall be granted unless and until said forms are completedfilled out and signed by the applicant withand until all fees for connection and meter are submitted. No connection to a water main shall be made without a permit being issued and twenty-four (24) hours notice to the Director of Public Works. No water from the City water supply shall be turned on for service into any premises by any person until the water meter has been installed and is registering all water used at the premises. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-1974) 7-5-3: WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND INSTALLATIONS: A. Location Of Connections And Installations Charge: All connections and installations of water service shall, upon application, be made from the existing main upon applicant's street to the street side of applicant's sidewalk or to a point four feet (4') within the curb line, whichever point the Superintendent Director of Public Works shall determineso elect. Said connections and installations shall be witnessed by authorized employees of the City and only after payment by the user or property owner at the time of application for water to the Finance DirectorCity Treasurer or collector of a connection fee as outlined below: (Ord. 1982-9, 3-25- 1982; amd. 1994 Code) RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION FEES1 Residence Type Projected PE Per Residence Connection Fee Based On $ 1,057.00/PE Efficiency or studio apartment 1.00 $ 1,057.001,587.00 1 bedroom apartment/condominium 1.50 $1,586.002,380.00 Formatted: Font: 12 pt 2 plus bedroom apartment/condominium 3.00 $4,761.003,171.00 1 bedroom townhome 1.50 $1,586.002,380.00 2 plus bedroom townhome 3.00 $3,171.004,761.00 Duplex home 3.50 $3,700.004,761.00 Single-family home 3.50 $3,700.005,554.00 NON-RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION FEES2 Water Meter Size Water Connection Fee Less than or equal to 1 inch $ 3,700.00 11/2 inch 4,000.00 2 inch 5,000.00 3 inch 8,000.00 4 inch 15,000.00 6 inch and larger TBD Notes: The above connection fees shall not include the connection only for supplying water for fire suppression. Non-residential land use shall be considered all land uses other than those defined in the residential connection fees table. TBD = Connection fee to be determined by City Council on a case by case basis. (Ord. 2006-32, 4-25-2006) B. Materials, Equipment And Labor: 1. If the superintendent of public works so desires, he may request The applicant will shall furnish materials, equipment and labor to install the service connection. Where such request is made the The materials used shall be in compliance with this Chapter and approved by the Superintendent Director of public Public Wworks and the installer shall be bonded, qualified as a licensed andplumber and approved by the Superintendent Director of Public Works before installation. If the Superintendent Director of Public Works provides any materials, equipment and labor to install the service connection, the cost of such equipment, materials and labor for the installation of such connections shall be in addition to the above charges. 2. The installation of the service connection by applicant shall be allowed only where connection will be made to the new watermains that are not yet in service. Where connection is made to existing city owned water mains, the installation of the service connection shall be made by the superintendent. C. Construction Specifications: All service connections and installations shall be in compliance with the City’s then effective Standard Specifications For Improvements adopted by the City Council provided with corporation cock, curb stopcock, shutoff and curb box and of a standard and approved type, and shall be subject to approval by the Superintendent Director of Public Works. All materials, including pipe, stopcock and valves shall be of a standard and approved type and placed and located under the direction of the Superintendent Director of Public Works. (Ord. 1982-9, 3-25-1982; amd. 1994 2016 Code) 7-5-4: WATER METERS: All water furnished consumers shall be metered, and all meters shall be in compliance with this Chapterof a standard and approved make, and shall be furnished by the City and set by the Water Department or licensed plumber. Meters shall remain the property of the City and are subject to removal any time. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to furnish protection to the water meter from theft, vandalism, breakage due to weather conditions or any other damages which may occur. The property owner will be required to pay for any repair to or replacement costs of the water meter if such is necessary (for other than normal maintenance); otherwise, the water meter is the responsibility of the Department of Public Works for accuracy and maintenance, and/or replacement. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-1974) 7-5-4-1: METER COSTS: All meters and shall be purchased fromthrough the City at the then current prices as established by the City Council and will include the meter, couplers, gaskets, back flow prevention device (for residential units only) meter wire and outside reader. Applicants purchasing non-residential meters will be required to purchase an approved back flow prevention device separately. Prices of water meters will be reviewed from time-to-time by the City Council and set by ordinance. Residential Meter Costs 5/8”x3/4” - $435.00 ¾”x3/4” - $460.00 * 1” - $590.00 * used only when necessitated by plumbing code Non-Residential Meter Costs 1 ½” - $1900.00 2” - $2110.00 3” - $2600.00 The costs involved in furnishing and installing the meter shall be borne by the applicant. Costs to be reimbursed to the city shall include the meter, remote readers, valves, checkvalves, meter setting hardware and labor. The charges shall be actual cost for materials and labor including fringe benefits, but excluding any fees for overhead, profit or similar marginal costs. (Ord. 1974 69, 10 24 1974) 7-5-4-2: METER LOCATIONS: The owners must shall provide suitable locations in the water piping systems for the metersame and meters shall be placed on a service pipe not to exceed two feet (2') from the wall where such pipe enters the premises. The owner shall provide a shutoff valve on the inlet side of the meter and a shutoff valve on the outlet side of the meter. The City shall provide a suitable check valve on the outlet side of the meter. The City shall provide a suitable check valve on the outlet side of the meter. There shall be provided a suitable place for the meter so as to keep it dry and clean, and readily accessible at all times to the meter reader and inspector of the Water Department. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-1974) 7-5-4-3: SIZE OF METERS: A. The size of meter required for any metered water supply shall be governed by the size and character of the premises served or to be served, as determined by the Building Code Official, in accordance with City Building Codes. The size of meters so specified shall be subject to change from time to time as demand or other condition may require. B. The City mayright is reserved to require an increase or decrease in the size of a meter in any case where, in the discretion of the City, the use of water exceeds the capacity of the meter or the use is not accurately measured. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-74) 7-5-4-4: MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR: Owners or occupants shall be responsible for the care and protection of a meter, but a meterthe same shall be subject to inspection and test at any reasonable time by the Water Department; however, meters may be repaired by the City at no cost to the owner and no oneDepartment. No person shall interfere with the registration of or break a seal on any meter; providing, however, that the Superintendent Director of Public Works may grant permission to break a seal for draining pipe or stopping leaks. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-74; 1994 Code) 7-5-4-5: METER TESTING: A. Tests May be Made: In case of doubt as to the accuracy of a meter, the consumer may request acomplain and tests tomay be made by the Superintendent Director of Public Works and if the meter is found to measure more than four two percent (42%) incorrectly, no charge shall be made; and if an over-register of more than four two percent (42%) is found, a proportional deduction shall be made from the previous water bill. If said meter registers within four two percent (42%) of accuracy, then all expense of testing shall be borne by the person making the requestcomplaint. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-74; amd. Ord. 1983-15, 9-22-83; 1994 Code) B. Entry Powers: The Superintendent Director of Public Works or his designated employees in the City Water Department,Department shall be allowed access at any reasonable time to the residences of all City water users for the purposes of checking the accuracy of the water meter located in the home when the home is equipped with a remote water meter indicator on the outside of the residence at all reasonable times. (Ord. 1984-1, 3-22-84) 7-5-4-6: READING METERS: The Superintendent Director of Public Works shall determine the amount of water usage by each individual customer of the City pursuant to any of the following three methodsfollowing methods to be selected by him in his absolute and sole discretion: A. An actual meter reading done by physical examination of the water meter or remote radio read, by employees of the City Water Department on a quarterly basis, but no less than one time a year on a bi-monthly basis; or B. A customer meter reading returned to the City Water Department at the request of the Superintendent of Public Works by the customer; or B. An estimated reading based on customer's usage. during the quarter being estimated from the last one year of the customer’s usage. In the event any specific customer has less than a one year history of water usage with the City, said estimates Estimates shall be based on the most recently ascertainable data on individual usage available to the Superintendent Director of Public Works. In no event shall estimated water billings be made for more than three (3) calendar quarters consecutive billing periods in any one year. (Ord. 1984-1, 3-22-84) 7-5-4-7: SERVICE TO MORE THAN ONE CUSTOMER THROUGH SINGLE METER: If, at the request of and for the convenience of the owner of a premises containing more than one customer, water is furnished to said premises through a single meter for the purpose of redistribution to the several customers, the charges set forth for service for a single family meter shall be multiplied by the number of customers served and the product there from shall be the water service connection charge. (Ord. 1974 69 10 24 74; 1994 Code) 7-5-5: WATER SERVICE RATES; BILLING PROCEDURES: 7-5-4-7: SERVICE TO MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WITH ONLY A SINGLE METER OR SHUTOFF A. If water is furnished to a multi-family building through a single meter for the purpose of redistribution to the several customers, the water service connection charge shall be the charge for a single-family meter multiplied by the number of customers served. B. No new water service shall be provided by the City to a multi-family building unless each single-family dwelling unit has a separate meter and shutoff box. It is the expressed policy of the City to prevent the establishment of and to encourage the elimination of all multi-family buildings with only a single meter or shutoff box except as allowed in this section. C. Effective August 1, 2018, service to a multi-family building with a single meter or shutoff box shall be billed only in the name of the landlord/owner or his or her duly appointed agent until such water service is exclusive to each single-family dwelling unit with meter and shutoff box. Agents appointed to act for the landlord/owner must be identified and authorized in writing to the City by the landlord/owner. The landlord/owner may also be a person, partnership or corporate entity lawfully designated as being solely responsible for the payment of water service to the City. D. Whenever a disconnection is authorized for a multi-family building with a single meter or shutoff box, water service shall not be reconnected until a separate shutoff box and meter is installed for each single-family dwelling unit at the landlord/owner’s expense.” 7-5-5-1: WATER SERVICE RATES AND CHARGES: A. Water Infrastructure Improvement And Maintenance Fee; Water Service Rates Established: 1. All water users shall be charged a water infrastructure improvement and maintenance fee of four dollars eight dollars twenty five cents ($8.254.00) per month through April 30, 20137. (Ord. 2012-18, 6-26-2012, 2016 Code) 2. Water service rates shall be as follows: a. Effective May 1, 2014, the water rates shall be: $14.00 up to 350 cubic feet of usage $2.97 per 100 cubic feet of usage over 350 cubic feet (Ord. 2014-14, 4-22-2014) b. Effective May 1, 2015, the water rates shall be: $16.00 up to 350 cubic feet of usage $3.65 per 100 cubic feet of usage over 350 cubic feet (Ord. 2015-22, 4-28-2015) c. Effective May 1, 2016, the water rates shall be: $17.00 up to 350 cubic feet of usage $4.30 per 100 cubic feet of usage over 350 cubic feet d. Effective May 1, 2017, the water rates shall be: $17.00 up to 350 cubic feet of usage $4.30 per 100 cubic feet of usage over 350 cubic feet e. Effective May 1, 2018, the water rates shall be: $17.00 up to 350 cubic feet of usage $4.30 per 100 cubic feet of usage over 350 cubic feet (Ord. 2014-14, 4-22-2014) 3. In determining the quantity used for billing purposes, one hundred (100) cubic feet shall include any fractional amount of cubic feet used. (Ord. 2010-21, 5-25-2010) B. More Than One Water Customer Through A Single Meter: After the effective date hereof, Eeach residential dwellinghousing unit or individual multi-tenant commercial tenant unitdevelopments will be charged for water as outlined in this section, regardless of the number of housing or commercial units that are served through a single meter. (Ord. 1982-9, 3-25-1982; amd. 1994 Code) C. Users Outside City Limits: 1. Water Rates: For all water consumption and water services rendered beyond the city limits for which each service shall be by meter registration, charges shall now be at the normal in city water rates and no further double charge shall be made. 1. Water Line And Plant Maintenance Fee: From January 1, 1984, forward, a water line and plant maintenance fee shall be charged at the rate of six dollars and seventy cents ($6.70) per month to be paid with each water bill, and upon the same terms, conditions and enforcements for each water service meter registration outside of the City; with said water line and plant maintenance fee being established herein by reason of the additional costs, which may vary from time to time, incurred by the City in maintaining and servicing a water delivery system not within its boundaries. (Ord. 1983-17, 12-15-1983) D. Bulk Water Rates: Bulk water rates are $50.00 per load. D. Temporary Water Use; Unmetered Rates: The flat rate for water services supplied on a temporary basis without meters shall be as follows: Filling outdoor swimming pools $ 75 .00 Outdoor shows, including carnivals, circuses and wild west shows, per day 105 .00 Unmetered service generally, per day 30 .00 (Ord. 1982-9, 3-25-1982) E. Private Sprinkler And Fire Protection Systems: The following rates and charges shall apply to all sprinkler and fire protection services connected with the water mains of the city: 1. Sprinkler system service: For each connection serving 500 sprinkler heads or less, semiannually $12 .50 For each additional sprinkler head on any connection, over 500 heads, semiannually $0.015 each 2. Fire protection service: For each fire hydrant located on private property, semi-annually $5 .00 For each wet hose connection on private property, semi-annually 1 .00 Sprinkler and fire protection service rates and charges shall not be subject to any discount. Such rates and charges shall be considered as payment only for such water as may be necessary to use in making the usual and ordinary tests of such systems under the underwriters' rules, or for actual fires. Sprinkler and fire protection service shall not be required to be metered unless it shall be found that water is used from same for purposes other than for the usual tests or for firefighting, in which case the city is empowered to require the installation of a meter. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24- 1974) 7-5-5-2: BILLS FOR SERVICE; DELINQUENCIES: A. Rendition Of Bills; Payment, First Notice: First notice bills for water furnished shall be mailed on or about July 1, October 1, January 1 and April 11 January 1, March 1, May 1, July 1, September 1, and November 1of1 of each year, and all first notice bills and charges for water usagerents and other services are payable at the office of the Finance Director within 30 days of the date of mailingCity Treasurer or collector. (Ord. 1982-9, 3-25-1982) B. Delinquent Bills, Second Notice: After 30 days from the mailing of the first bill and the bill not being paid a delinquent second notice bill shall be mailed. All charges for water shall be due and payable on rendition by mail of first notice of amount to the owner or tenant and shall become delinquent at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the respective rendition of first notice bills date in section 7-5-5-2A above, or from the actual date of mailing of first notice bills if the rendition by mail date occurs later than the respective rendition of bills date in Section 7-5-5-2 A. above. The delinquent second notice bill amount shall be ten percent (10%) greater than the first notice bill amount. The second notice bill shall be due ten (10) days from its date ofthe respective mailing date. For purposes of enforcing a lien as provided by statutes, the date of delinquency on the second notice bill is the first eligible lien date. C. Shut-off Of Water Service For Nonpayment; Turn-on Fee; Payment Plan: Ten (10) daysIf a delinquent after a bill is not paid before its due dateshall become delinquent, the water service may be shut off from the premises, and shall not be turned on until all back rentals and charges are paid, together with a five fifty dollar ($50.00) fee for turning on the water when service is located within the City limits; said fee shall be ten fifty dollars ($1050.00) plus all back rentals and charges when service is located beyond the City limits; provided however, at the discretion of the City Finance Director, a water service customer may enter into a payment plan with the City in order to avoid water shutoff. In this event the customer does not have a prior history of delinquent bills and , the water service customer shall pays the entirety of the current monthly charges, plus a portion of the delinquent charges as determined by the City Finance Director and the customer does not have a prior history of delinquent bills, so long as all delinquent sums are paid in full within not more than eighteen (18) months, the City shall charge a ten (10%) percent penalty every two months on the past due balance. Nothing in this section shall obligate the City to enter into a payment plan with a water service customer. (Ord. 2010-14, 3-9-2010) D. Additional Deposit Required: In the event a water user becomes more than ten (10) days delinquent on two (2) or more separate occasions, the user may be required to furnish an additional deposit to the city in an amount equal to one estimated bill or not less than twenty five dollars ($25.00), and twenty five dollars ($25.00) in the case of all other property, and the city may refuse to turn said water on again until the aforesaid deposit has been received. (Ord. 1982- 9, 3-25-1982) 7-5-5-3: RESPONSIBILITY OF WATER SERVICE CUSTOMER: Water service accounts and charges shall be kept in the name of the owner of the property served, except as to property owned by the state of Illinois. Only such owner shall be recognized as the consumer, except where the tenant has the account in his/her name . When the account is in the name of the tenant makes and maintains a deposit of an amount of money with the city treasurer equal to the estimated water bills for the premises to be served to guarantee payment for water service, but in no case shall such deposit be less than twenty-five dollars ($25.00). The deposit shall accompany the application for service. Where no deposits are made or where the deposit is not maintained, the owner of the premises served shall be held responsible for the payment of all water rentals and all other proper charges in connection with water services to said premises. Such payments shall be accepted from tenants if tendered by them, but accepting payments from tenants shall not subsequently relieve the owner of the premises from the responsibility of paying water rentals or other service charges when due or relieve the real estate from the lien hereinbefore provided. Any deposit made upon application for service shall be returned to consumer upon termination of service. If the bill for a building with multiple units and a single meter with oneis owned by one common owner who pays the bill for all of the unitsand has multiple units, with one shut-off location is delinquent, the City may shut-off the entire building as provided in Section 7-5-5-2C4-7. until the entire building is up-to-date on billing. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-1974) 7-5-6: WATERWORKS REVENUE: A. Duties Of Finance DirectorCity Treasurer: 1. Monies To: All money due the water department from all purposes and sources, including the collection of water usage chargesrents or rates, shall be paid to the Finance directorCity Treasurer. 2. Custodian Of Funds: The Finance DirectorCity Treasurer shall be custodian of the funds derived from income received from the waterworks system, and shall begive proper bonded for the faithful discharge of his duties. The Finance DirectorTreasurer shall maintain separate accounts as is necessary or required by law. in which shall be placed the interest and sinking fund monies and another account in which shall be placed the depreciation funds and all other funds necessary to provide for refunding outstanding certificates or bonds payable out of water revenue. B. Water Fund: All revenue derived from the sale of water as herein provided shall be kept separate and apart by the Finance DirectorCity Treasurer from the other revenue of the City. Said money shall be known as the water fund and shall be used exclusively for waterworks purposes; that is, for the maintenance, extension, improvement and operation of said waterworks, the retirement of waterworks bonds and certificates, and under no circumstances shall this revenue be diverted to any other purpose unless authorized by City Council at any time. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-1974) C. Water Surplus Account And Water Bond Redemption Account: The city council deems that in its best interest and required pursuant to the terms of an ordinance passed on May 8, 1969, authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds for the purpose of improving its water system, to create two (2) accounts, one designated as a surplus account in which any surplus monies remaining after payment of those monies required to be paid into special accounts created under section 8, subparagraphs (a) through (d) of said ordinance of May 8, 1969, and said account shall be designated as a surplus account and bond redemption account upon the following terms and conditions: 1. Surplus Account: A surplus account shall hereby be established pursuant to the terms of the city ordinance passed May 8, 1969, providing that all monies remaining in the water fund of the city established by said ordinance after all previously described payments shall be placed into the surplus account at the close of each billing quarter. At the end of each fiscal year, a sum of not less than fifty percent (50%) of the amount paid into said surplus account shall be transferred to a bond redemption account created hereafter. The remaining balance contained in said surplus account may be used for the improvement, extension or maintenance of the city water system. 2. Bond Redemption Account: The city hereby creates a bond redemption account which shall be established at the close of the next fiscal year occurring upon the effective date hereof. Fifty percent (50%) of those monies transferred at the close of each fiscal year from the surplus account of the water fund of the city shall be placed in said bond redemption account so as to provide funds with which to retire water bond obligations of the city. (Ord. 1985-16, 10-24- 1985) 7-5-7: CHANGE OF RESIDENCE BY WATER SERVICE CUSTOMERS: No person, either owner or tenant, who, in changing his residence from one location to any other location served by the water department, shall be given water service until any and all delinquent water usage feesrentals which are charged against him at his former place of residence shall have been paid in full, and no water at the new location shall be turned on and, if so, the same shall be turned off until settlement of such delinquent water rental at the former location is made. A charge of five fifty dollars ($50.00) for turning on water and renewing service shall be made, in addition to the payment of the delinquent water usagerental or charges. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24- 1974) 7-5-8: WATER SHUTOFFS AND TURNONS: A. Authority To Shut-Off Water; Non-liability: The City shall not be held responsible by reason of the breaking of any service pipe or apparatus, or for failure toin the supply of water. The City, when necessary, without notice, may shut the water off in its mains for the purpose of making repairs or extensions or for other purposes. No claims shall be made against tThe City shall not be liable by reason of the breakage of any service pipe or service cock, or from other damage that may result from the shutting off of water for repairing, laying or relaying mains, hydrants or other connections. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-1974) B. Requests For Water Shut-off And Turn-on: 1. Water Shut-off: Owners or consumers when they pay for water service desiring to discontinue the use of water shall give notice thereof, in writing, to the superintendent Director of Public Works, or his designee, who shall then cause the water to be turned off. Water usagerents or charges for services shall continuebe made until such notice is given. When water service is discontinued, all water rentals for such service shall become due and payable. When water service is again desired after having been discontinued, a charge of five dollars ($5.00) shall be made and collected before turning on water and renewing service. 2. Water Turn-on: In turning on water, the City Council or the water department shall not be responsible for any damage that may occur by reason of improper fixtures, open or improper connections, or for any other causes. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-1974; amd. 1994 Code) 7-5-9: PROHIBITED ACTS AND CONDITIONS: A. Electrical Grounding To Water System: No part of any water service, including the portion owned or used by any user of water, shall be used as a ground for a radio, telephone and other electrical system or appliance It shall be unlawful for any person to ground an electrical system toBonding of the water supply system shall not be considered to be a ground. B. Unnecessary Waste Of Water: Consumers shall prevent unnecessary waste of water and keep all water outlets closed when not in actual use. If unnecessary waste of water takes place, the City Council reserves the right to cut off the supply, and the City further reserves the right to prohibit the use of water for yard sprinklers, elevators and large consumers of water when, in the judgment of the Council, it shall be necessary to do so. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-1974) B. It shall be the duty of all consumers of city water at any and all times to exercise due diligence to prevent waste of the water supply and to this end shall stop any leaks on their premises. The city water supply will be shut off from any and all premises until such violation of this rule is corrected. C. Use Of Ground Water Prohibited: 1. Prohibited: The use or attempt to use as a water supply, ground water from within the corporate limits of the United City of Yorkville by the installation or drilling of wells or by any other method is hereby prohibited within the City. (Ord. 2008-78, 8-26-2008) 2. Penalties: (Rep. by Ord. 2008-74, 8-26-2008) 3. Definitions: PERSON: Any individual, partnership, firm, company, limited liability company, corporation, association, joint stock company, trust, estate, political subdivision, or any other legal entity, or their legal representative, agents, or assigns. POTABLE WATER: Any water used for human or domestic consumption, including, but not limited to, water used for drinking, bathing, swimming, washing dishes, or preparing foods. 4. Memorandum Of Understanding: The Mayor of the United City of Yorkville is hereby authorized and directed to enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Illinois environmental protection agency ("Illinois EPA") in which the United City of Yorkville assumes responsibility for tracking the remediation sites, notifying the Illinois EPA of changes to the ordinances, and taking certain precautions when siting public potable water supply wells. (Ord. 2005-50, 6-14-2005) 5. Resale of Water Prohibited: No water shall be resold or distributed by the recipient thereof from the City supply to any premises at a rate other than that charged by the City. A person who resells water from the City supply shall not add any additional costs or charges to the rate charged by the City, other than any applicable administrative fee. The billing statement shall include any applicable administrative fee as a separate line item on the bill. The line item for the administrative fee shall also include the name of the entity that is charging the fee. Any billing statement for water resale shall solely be in the name of the reseller or his or her assigns. The billing statement shall not include any references to the City or the City’s logo. 4. Damage to or Tampering with System: It is unlawful for any person not authorized by the Director of Public Works to tamper with, alter, or injure any part of the City’s waterworks or supply system or any meter. Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.25", No bullets or numbering Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt Formatted: Indent: First line: 0", Space Before: 0 pt, After: 0 pt 7-5-10: TEMPORARY SERVICE TO CONTRACTORS: A. If, during construction of a service installation on a three-quarter inch (3/4") or one inch (1") tap, it is temporarily impossible to install a meter as required, the superintendent of public works or the city council may, upon receipt of application, issue a temporary bulk water permit, and turn on the service and allow use of unmetered water for normal construction purposes. Such permit shall not exceed sixty (60) days after the date of issuance of the permit for construction of said service installation. B. The charges for temporary bulk water permit shall be ten dollars ($10.00) for each thirty (30) days or less that a meter is not installed after issuance of a plumbing permit, and not to exceed a total of sixty (60) days. Said charges shall be paid in advance of each period requested and before water is turned on by the Department. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-74; 1994 Code) 7-5-10: REGULATIONS FOR DEVELOPERS: A. Public Water Supply for Subdivisions: No subdivision of land in the corporate limits shall be approved by the City Council unless the lots therein are provided with adequate water connectionsng with the City water system, if at all practical. Water connections and City water main extensions, if necessary in order to connect to the City water system, shall be at the subdivider's expense but under the direct supervision and control of the Director of Public WorksCity Council or its authorized agents. Prior to the time said extension is undertaken, the subdividers shall pay the cost of said extension. Upon completion, any extension shall be dedicated to the City and become property of the City who shall then assume full responsibility for maintenance and repairs of the same. B. Water System Improvements: Use The standards and specifications from Title 11, subdivision control ordinance, of this Code shall be used for contiguity and construction. 1. Where improvements and extensions to the water distribution system are required in order to serve the needs of a development, the developer shall bear all costs ofin the water main installation3. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-74) 2. Prior to proceeding with construction, the developer shall prepare and submit plans and specifications to all Federal, State, County, Township and other governmental agencies as required by law for p. Permits or approvals. shall be received from all appropriate agencies. The contractor shall also submit plans and specifications to the Director of Public Works and shall obtain written approval and a permit from the City Council before proceeding with construction. The following requirements shall be met: a. Plans and specifications submitted shall bear the seal of a current registered Professional Engineer. b. Water mains shall be not less than six eight inches (68") in diameter. c. Fire hydrants shall be set at each intersection and at intervals not to exceed four hundred feet (400') (whichever results in closer spacing). (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-74) (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-74; 1994 Code) d. All future water mains shall be constructed of ductile iron. Ductile iron valves and appurtenances shall be used whenever possible; however, the Superintendent Director of Public Works may, at his discretion, allow the use of cast iron valves and other cast iron appurtenances to the actual water pipe upon his written consent to the installer. (Ord. 1983-15, 9-22-83; 1994 Code) e. Water mains shall be buried such that finished grade will provide not less than five and one-half feet (51/2') of cover and not greater than eight and one-half feet (81/2') of cover over the main. f. All water main extensions shall be designed, installed and tested in accordance with the the most current edition of the "Standard Specifications for Water and Sewer Main Construction in Illinois". (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-74) g. The contractor shall pay all expenses incurred by the City to provide field inspections and approval of water mains before, during and after construction. At the sole option of the City, the following procedures shall be followed: (1) Complete field inspection by the SuperintendentDirector of Public Works or his agent, with free advice and consulting on the project by the design engineer; (2) Complete field inspection by the design engineer for the developer with periodic field checking by the Superintendent Director of Public Works or his agent; (3) Complete field inspection by the design engineer for the developer. If the City selects this option, there shall be submitted to the City a sworn statement carrying the design engineer's signature and seal stating that the water system was installed in strict accordance with the plans and specifications as approved, except as shown in the as-built drawings. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-74; 1994 Code) h. Mylar or cloth reproducible drawings shall be submitted to the City after construction showing the system as-built. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-74; 2016 Codified) C. Installation of Oversize Mains: 1. Notice Requiring Oversized Mains; Compliance: a. When, in any subdivision now within the City or within one and one-half (11/2) miles of the City limits which normally would require an eight inch (8") size water main but which, for the purpose of complying with the plan of development of the City's water system to provide an adequate water supply, not only to the particular subdivision but also to subdivisions which in the future may become a part of the City, and where the City Engineer and Superintendent Director of Public Works have determined that water mains of a larger diameter than eight inches (8") and the size thereof, shall be installed, then the City Engineer or the Superintendent Director of Public Works shall inform the subdividers, builders and developers of the subdivision by a written notice of that fact and require them to install such oversized water mains and at the same time, in said notice, inform them of the size to be installed. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-74; 1994 Code) b. Upon being so notified as provided for in this subsection, no subdivider, builder or developer shall install any water main in such subdivision of any size other than that specified to him by the aforesaid notice. 2. Costs: At such time as the installation of said oversized water main pipe shall have been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to the City for such installation, and also in accordance with the notice specified in this subsection, and all such installations shall have been inspected and approved by the City as provided for by ordinance of the City, then the City will pay any such subdivider, builder or developer who has installed oversized water main pipe as above provided or approve a recapture ordinance, the difference of the cost at current prices, as of the time of said installation, between the eight inch (8") main pipe which was originally planned to be used and the cost of the oversized pipe which the City directed to be used. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-74) 7-5-12: PRIVATE SPRINKLER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS: Private sprinkler and fire protection water systems may be connected with the City water mains subject to the following provisions and regulations and provided the applicant is a consumer taking water supply for other uses from the City at regular rates for such uses: A. Application for Service; Approval: Whenever sprinkler or fire protection services are desired, application shall be made for the privilege of installing such service, which application shall include complete specifications, adherence to the current CityICC Codes and plans of the installation contemplated. If said application is approved by the City Council, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for connection to City mains, subject to the provisions of this Chapter. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-74) B. Inspection of System: 1. City water will be turned into any sprinkler or fire protection system only when such installation shall have been subjected to and passed such inspection and pressure tests as may be required by the Superintendent Director of Public Works. All pipes in connection with such system shall be left exposed until such tests have been made and the system approved. No cross- connections between private water supplies and services connected to City mains shall be permitted. 2. Any and all premises connected to City water mains for sprinkler or fire protection services shall be subject to inspection by the Superintendent Director of Public Works at any time for count and conformity to the City regulations. C. Rates and Charges: Rates and charges shall be as provided in Section 7-5-5-1 of this Chapter. (Ord. 1974-69, 10-24-74; 1994 Code) 7-5-13: WATER CUSTOMER CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT: The rules and regulations as set forth in this chapter shall be considered a part of the contract of every person who takes water supplied by the City through the City Waterworks. Every such person who takes water shall be considered as having expressly agreed to be bound by the provisions of this chapter upon his acceptance of water service from the City. (Ord. 1974-69, 10- 24-1974) 7-5-14: VIOLATION AND PENALTY: (Rep. by Ord. 2008-74, 8-26-2008) 7-5-15: WATER CONSERVATION REGULATIONS: A. Definitions: The following words and phrases when used in this section shall, for the purpose of this section, have the following meanings: CITY: The United City of Yorkville. DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM: A soaking hose that when in use does not result in an actual dissipation of water. DRIP LINE: Pertaining to a tree or shrub, the ground area immediately beneath the branches of the tree or shrub. LANDSCAPE/LANDSCAPING: Sod and seeded turf lawns, gardens, trees, shrubs, and other living plants. PERMITTED HOURS OF WATER USE: A time period between five o'clock (5:00) A.M. and nine o'clock (9:00) A.M., and between nine o'clock (9:00) P.M. and twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight, each day. PERSON: Any individual, firm, partnership, association, corporation, company, organization, or entity of any kind. WATER: The water provided by and obtained by a person from the City water supply and distribution system. B. Application: 1. The provisions of this section shall apply to all persons using water, and to all properties within the City or unincorporated areas which are connected to the City's water supply and distribution system, regardless of whether any person using the water has a contract for service with the City. 2. The provisions of this section shall apply annually from May 1 through September 30, subject to any modifications thereof, including application of these or other regulations during this or any other time, by an emergency proclamation issued pursuant to subsection C of this section. C. Restricted Hours And Days For Specified Uses: 1. Water may be used for landscape watering or the filling of swimming pools only as follows: a. All properties with even numbered street numbers (i.e., numbers ending in 0, 2, 4, 6 or 8) may use water for landscape watering or for pool filling, only on even numbered calendar dates during permitted hours of water use. c. All properties with odd numbered street numbers (i.e., numbers ending in 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9) may use water for landscape watering or for pool filling only on odd numbered calendar dates during permitted hours of water use. d. There shall be no restrictions as to hours or days when water may be used for any of the following: (1) Landscape watering or sprinkling where such watering or sprinkling is done by a person using a handheld watering device; (2) Filling swimming pools with a volume of fifty (50) gallons or less; (3) The automatic watering of trees and shrubs by means of automatic root feed or drip irrigation systems within the drip line of the tree or shrub; or (4) Vehicle and equipment washing; or (5) Any other lawful use of water such as bathing, clothes washing, and other normal household uses not otherwise specifically restricted by the provisions of this section. D. Restrictions For Sod Laying And Lawn Seeding For New Lawns: Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection C of this section, the following special regulations shall apply: 1. Sod laying, lawn seeding, and the planting of other landscaping for the establishment of a new lawn or new landscaping is prohibited from July 1 through August 31 each year unless the source of watering for said sod, lawn seeding and/or planting of landscaping is derived from a private well, imported water source or means other than any municipal water source. 2. From May 1 through June 30 and from September 1 through September 30, water may be used on new lawns (sod or seed), only as follows: a. Priora. Prior to sod laying or lawn seeding, a sod watering permit, attached as exhibit A to the ordinance codified herein, must be shall be obtained from the Director of Public WorksUnited City of Yorkville. b. On the day new sod or seed has been placed on a property, a person may use an automatic sprinkling device to apply water to the sod or seed for a total period of time not to exceed eight (8) hours. c. For the next nine (9) days thereafter, a person may apply water to said sod or seed each day during permitted hours of water use. d. Following the first ten (10) days after the sod or seed is placed, the provisions of subsection C of this section shall apply. 3. Prior to the execution of any real estate contract for the sale of newly constructed property, the builder or owner of such new construction shall: a. Inform prospective purchasers of the restrictions upon the installation of new lawns set forth in this section; b. Attach a copy of these regulations to the contract; and d. Obtain the signature of the purchaser(s) on a statement that he/she or they has /have been informed of the new lawn installation restrictions set forth in this section. 4. The applicant for a certificate of occupancy for any newly constructed property shall submit as a part of his application, and as a condition of issuance of such certificate, a copy of said signed statement. When an application for certificate of occupancy is submitted prior to sale of the property, and the future occupant is unknown, the applicant shall submit his signed statement that he shall comply with the requirements of this section at the time the real estate contract is executed. E. Waste Of Water Prohibited: No person shall allow a continuous stream of water to run off into any gutter, ditch, drain, or street inlet while using water for restricted purposes during the permitted hours of water use. F. Exceptions: The provisions of this section shall not apply to any commercial or industrial entity for which use of water is necessary to continue normal business operations, or to maintain stock or inventory. Provided, however, this exception shall not apply to any and all uses of water not essential to normal business operations or maintenance of inventory or stock, and specifically shall not apply to landscape watering or pool filling. G. Bulk Water Rates: Bulk water rates shall be increased to three (3) times the nonresident water rate during the time described in subsection B of this section. H. Hydrant Use Prohibited: Hydrants connected to the City water supply and distribution system for the purpose of providing water for firefighting purposes shall not be opened by any person, other than authorized City or Fire District personnel, except for the purpose of fighting a fire. I. Emergency Proclamation: 1. Whenever the water supply of the City is diminished from any cause, including, but not limited to, prolonged dry period, increased water demand, equipment failure, or water quality concerns, to an amount which in the opinion of the City Engineer or Director of Public Works is or is likely to become dangerous to the health and safety of the public, the City Mayor is hereby authorized and empowered to issue an emergency proclamation specifying different or additional regulations on the use of water. 2. Such regulations may provide for limitations on the usage of water, limitations on days and hours of use of water for some or all purposes, and the prohibition of specified uses of water. 3. Upon issuing such proclamation, the City Mayor shall make the contents thereof known to the public by posting a copy at the City Hall, and by news release to local newspapers and radio media, and may also endeavor to notify the City residents and other persons in any other practical manner that he or she shall devise. Further, the City Mayor shall immediately deliver notice of such proclamation, and the regulations that have been imposed by such proclamation, to all members of the City Council. 4. The emergency proclamation of the City Mayor, and the regulations imposed thereby, shall remain in full force and effect until any one of the following shall first occur: a. The City Mayor determines that the emergency no longer exists and that the emergency proclamation, and the regulations imposed thereby, shall no longer continue in effect. b. The City Council modifies or repeals the emergency proclamation, and the regulations imposed thereby, by means of an ordinance enacted at any regular or special meeting of the City Council. c. The first regular meeting of the City Council occurring more than thirty (30) days after the date of the emergency proclamation of the City Mayor. 5. Any City employee or officer may, at the direction of the City Mayor, notify and warn any person of the effect of said emergency proclamation and direct said person to comply with said watering or sprinkling restrictions. If any said person, after having first been warned about said restrictions of the emergency proclamation, fails to comply with the water restrictions, the person shall be deemed to be in violation of this section. (Ord. 2004-17, 3-23-2004) J. Restriction On Permanent Landscape Watering Systems Of Nonresidential Properties: 1. This subsection J shall apply only to nonresidential properties, and common and/or open space areas of residential developments. 2. For this subsection J, a "permanent landscape watering system" shall be defined as any system of pipes, sprinkler heads or similar devices installed underground to be used to provide landscape watering. 3. Landscape watering upon nonresidential properties shall be limited as follows: a. For properties with one building, a total area within the property not to exceed one acre may be watered by a permanent landscape watering system using the City's potable water. This area shall be measured by the amount of nonimpervious surface on the property including all landscaped areas, lawn areas and green space regardless of the size of the area initially planned to be irrigated. b. For properties with more than one building, a total area within the property not to exceed three (3) acres may be watered by a permanent landscape watering system using the City's potable water. This area shall be measured by the amount of nonimpervious surface on the property including all landscaped areas, lawn areas and green space regardless of the size of the area initially planned to be irrigated. c. For the common space and/or open space of a primarily residential development, no permanent landscape watering system shall be allowed using the City's potable water. d. All permanent landscape watering systems permitted to use the City's potable water shall be metered the same as domestic water service. No special meters will be permitted. 4. The total area to be watered shall be measured as the area within reach of any permanent device used to water landscape including, but not limited to, sprinkler heads, hoses, trenches or similar devices to water landscape. (Ord. 2006-123, 10-24-2006) 7-5-16: INSPECTION; AUDIT; APPEAL: A. Right Of Access; Use Inspection: The United City of Yorkville and its employees and the Illinois environmental protection agency shall have ready access at all reasonable times to the premises, places or buildings where water service is supplied for the purpose of inspecting, examining and testing the consumption, use and flow of water, and it shall be unlawful for any person to interfere with, prevent or obstruct the United City of Yorkville or its duly authorized agent or the Illinois environmental protection agency in its duties hereunder. Every user of the system shall take the same upon the conditions prescribed in this section. B. Powers And Authority Of Inspectors: 1. The Director of Public Works and other duly authorized employees of the United City of Yorkville and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, bearing proper credentials and identification shall be permitted to enter all properties for the purposes of inspection, observation, measurement, sampling, and testing in accordance with the provisions of this section. The United City of Yorkville or its representative shall have no authority to inquire into any processes, including metallurgical, chemical, oil refining, ceramic, paper, or other industries beyond that point having a direct bearing on the kind and source of discharge to the sewers or waterway or facilities for waste treatment. 2. While performing the necessary work on private properties referred to above the director of public works or duly authorized employees of the United City of Yorkville and the Illinois environmental protection agency shall observe all safety rules applicable to the premises established by the property owner or its agent, and the property owner or its agent shall be held harmless for injury or death to the United City of Yorkville employees, and the United City of Yorkville shall indemnify the company against liability claims and demands for personal injury or property damage asserted against the property owner and growing out of the gauging and sampling operation, except as such may be caused by negligence or failure of the property owner or its agent to maintain conditions as required in this chapter. 3. The Director of Public Works and other duly authorized employees of the United City of Yorkville bearing proper credentials and identification shall be permitted to enter all private properties through which the United City of Yorkville holds a duly negotiated easement for the purposes of, but not limited to, inspection, observation, measurement, sampling, repair, and maintenance of any portion of the waterworks lying within said easement. All entry and subsequent work, if any, on said easement, shall be done in full accordance with the terms of the duly negotiated easement pertaining to the private property involved. C. Access To Records: The IEPA or its authorized representative shall have access to any books, documents, papers and records of the United City of Yorkville, which are applicable to the water system, of user charges for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts and transcriptions thereof to ensure compliance with the terms of any loan obtained from the IEPA under its Public Water Supply (PWS) loan program. D. Annual Review Of Charges: The adequacy of the water service charge shall be reviewed, not less often than annually, by certified public accountants for the United City of Yorkville in their annual audit report. The water service charge shall be revised periodically to reflect a change in the local capital costs or overhead, maintenance and repair costs. E. Appeals: Users shall be provided the method for computing rates and service charges within fourteen (14) days of written request. City shall make best efforts to remedy any disagreement with the method used or the computations made within thirty (30) days of a formal written appeal outlining the discrepancies. (Ord. 2005-19, 3-8-2005) Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 1 Ordinance No. 2017-____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AMENDING THE WATER USE AND SERVICE REGULATIONS WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the “City”) is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City staff has completed a complete review and update to the requirements and regulations in Chapter 5 of Title 7, for water use and service. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1: That Chapter 5, Water Use and Service, of Title 7 of the Yorkville City Code is hereby amended by deleting said Chapter in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following: “Chapter 5 WATER USE AND SERVICE 7-5-1: WATER DEPARTMENT: A. Supervision: The Water Department of the City shall be under the supervision of the Director of Public Works who shall report to the City Council the activities of the Department whenever requested by the Council. He shall also keep a correct map of all water mains in the City, with their dimensions, locations and connections, hydrants and cutoffs; and shall keep such books, records, maps and other accounts which shall be delivered to his successor. B. Salaries And Wages: 1. Director of Public Works: The Director of Public Works may receive his wages from the water fund for his services in the active supervision of said waterworks; such sum to be determined by the current City compensation policies. 2. Department Employees: The Mayor, or his designee, shall have the authority to hire and fire all other employees necessary for the proper operation and management of the waterworks, all wages and other expenses of the water department may be paid out of the water fund in accordance with the budget as approved by the City Council. 7-5-2: APPLICATIONS FOR WATER SERVICE AND CONNECTIONS: All applications for water service connections and for water service shall be made in writing on forms to be furnished by the City. No approval for water service connection shall be granted unless and until said forms are completed and signed by the applicant with all fees for connection and meter. No connection to a water main shall be made without a permit being issued and Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 2 twenty-four (24) hours notice to the Director of Public Works. No water from the City water supply shall be turned on for service into any premises by any person until the water meter has been installed and is registering all water used at the premises. 7-5-3: WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND INSTALLATIONS: A. Location Of Connections And Installations: All connections and installations of water service shall be made from the existing main upon applicant's street to the street side of applicant's sidewalk or to a point four feet (4') within the curb line, whichever point the Director of Public Works shall determine. Said connections and installations shall be witnessed by authorized employees of the City and only after payment by the user or property owner at the time of application for water to the Finance Director of a connection fee as outlined below: RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION FEES Residence Type Connection Fee Efficiency or studio apartment $ 1,587.00 1 bedroom apartment/condominium $2,380.00 2 plus bedroom apartment/condominium $4,761.00 1 bedroom townhome $2,380.00 2 plus bedroom townhome $4,761.00 Duplex home $4,761.00 Single-family home $5,554.00 NON-RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION FEES Water Meter Size Water Connection Fee Less than or equal to 1 inch $ 3,700.00 11/2 inch 4,000.00 2 inch 5,000.00 3 inch 8,000.00 4 inch 15,000.00 6 inch and larger TBD Notes: The above connection fees shall not include the connection only for supplying water for fire suppression. Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 3 Non-residential land use shall be considered all land uses other than those defined in the residential connection fees table. TBD = Connection fee to be determined by City Council on a case by case basis. B. Materials, Equipment And Labor: 1. The applicant shall furnish materials, equipment and labor to install the service connection. The materials used shall be in compliance with this Chapter and approved by the Director of Public Works and the installer shall be bonded, qualified as a licensed plumber and approved by the Director of Public Works before installation. If the Director of Public Works provides any materials, equipment and labor to install the service connection, the cost of such equipment, materials and labor for the installation of such connections shall be in addition to the above charges. C. Construction Specifications: All service connections and installations shall be in compliance with the City’s then effective Standard Specifications For Improvements adopted by the City Council provided with corporation cock, curb stopcock, shutoff and curb box and subject to approval by the Director of Public Works. All materials, including pipe, stopcock and valves shall be placed and located under the direction of the Director of Public Works. 7-5-4: WATER METERS: All water furnished consumers shall be metered, and all meters shall be in compliance with this Chapter and shall be furnished by the City and set by the Water Department or licensed plumber. Meters shall remain the property of the City and are subject to removal any time. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to furnish protection to the water meter from theft, vandalism, breakage due to weather conditions or any other damages which may occur. The property owner will be required to pay for any repair to or replacement costs of the water meter if such is necessary (for other than normal maintenance); otherwise, the water meter is the responsibility of the Department of Public Works for accuracy and maintenance, and/or replacement. 7-5-4-1: METER COSTS: All meters and shall be purchased from the City at the then current prices as established by the City Council and will include the meter, couplers, gaskets, back flow prevention device (for residential units only) meter wire and outside reader. Applicants purchasing non-residential meters will be required to purchase an approved back flow prevention device separately. Residential Meter Costs 5/8”x3/4” - $435.00 ¾”x3/4” - $460.00 Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 4 * 1” - $590.00 * used only when necessitated by plumbing code Non-Residential Meter Costs 1 ½” - $1900.00 2” - $2110.00 3” - $2600.00 7-5-4-2: METER LOCATIONS: The owners shall provide suitable locations in the water piping systems for the meter and meters shall be placed on a service pipe not to exceed two feet (2') from the wall where such pipe enters the premises. The owner shall provide a shutoff valve on the inlet side of the meter and a shutoff valve on the outlet side of the meter. The City shall provide a suitable check valve on the outlet side of the meter. The City shall provide a suitable check valve on the outlet side of the meter. There shall be provided a suitable place for the meter so as to keep it dry and clean, and readily accessible at all times to the meter reader and inspector of the Water Department. 7-5-4-3: SIZE OF METERS: A. The size of meter required for any metered water supply shall be governed by the size and character of the premises served or to be served, as determined by the Building Code Official, in accordance with City Building Codes. The size of meters so specified shall be subject to change from time to time as demand or other condition may require. B. The City may require an increase or decrease in the size of a meter in any case where, in the discretion of the City, the use of water exceeds the capacity of the meter or the use is not accurately measured. 7-5-4-4: MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR: Owners or occupants shall be responsible for the care and protection of a meter, but a meter shall be subject to inspection and test at any reasonable time by the Water Department. No person shall interfere with the registration of or break a seal on any meter; providing, however, that the Director of Public Works may grant permission to break a seal for draining pipe or stopping leaks. 7-5-4-5: METER TESTING: A. Tests May be Made: In case of doubt as to the accuracy of a meter, the consumer may request a test to be made by the Director of Public Works and if the meter is found to measure more than two percent (2%) incorrectly, no charge shall be made; and if an over-register of more Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 5 than two percent (2%) is found, a proportional deduction shall be made from the previous water bill. If said meter registers within two percent (2%) of accuracy, then all expense of testing shall be borne by the person making the request. B. Entry Powers: The Director of Public Works or his designated employees in the City Water Department shall be allowed access at any reasonable time to the residences of all City water users for the purposes of checking the accuracy of the water meter located in the home. 7-5-4-6: READING METERS: The Director of Public Works shall determine the amount of water usage by each individual customer of the City pursuant to any of the following methods to be selected by him in his absolute and sole discretion: A. An actual meter reading done by physical examination of the water meter or remote radio read, by employees of the City on a bi-monthly basis; or B. An estimated reading based on customer's usage. Estimates shall be based on the most recently ascertainable data on individual usage available to the Director of Public Works. In no event shall estimated water billings be made for more than three (3) consecutive billing periods in any one year. 7-5-4-7: SERVICE TO MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WITH ONLY A SINGLE METER OR SHUTOFF A. If water is furnished to a multi-family building through a single meter for the purpose of redistribution to the several customers, the water service connection charge shall be the charge for a single-family meter multiplied by the number of customers served. B. No new water service shall be provided by the City to a multi-family building unless each single-family dwelling unit has a separate meter and shutoff box. It is the expressed policy of the City to prevent the establishment of and to encourage the elimination of all multi-family buildings with only a single meter or shutoff box except as allowed in this section. C. Effective August 1, 2018, service to a multi-family building with a single meter or shutoff box shall be billed only in the name of the landlord/owner or his or her duly appointed agent until such water service is exclusive to each single-family dwelling unit with meter and shutoff box. Agents appointed to act for the landlord/owner must be identified and authorized in writing to the City by the landlord/owner. The landlord/owner may also be a person, partnership or corporate entity lawfully designated as being solely responsible for the payment of water service to the City. D. Whenever a disconnection is authorized for a multi-family building with a single meter or shutoff box, water service shall not be reconnected until a separate shutoff box and meter is installed for each single-family dwelling unit at the landlord/owner’s expense.” 7-5-5-1: WATER SERVICE RATES AND CHARGES: A. Water Infrastructure Improvement And Maintenance Fee; Water Service Rates Established: Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 6 1. All water users shall be charged a water infrastructure improvement and maintenance fee of four dollars ($4.00) per month through April 30, 2017. 2. Water service rates shall be as follows: d. Effective May 1, 2017, the water rates shall be: $17.00 up to 350 cubic feet of usage $4.30 per 100 cubic feet of usage over 350 cubic feet e. Effective May 1, 2018, the water rates shall be: $17.00 up to 350 cubic feet of usage $4.30 per 100 cubic feet of usage over 350 cubic feet 3. In determining the quantity used for billing purposes, one hundred (100) cubic feet shall include any fractional amount of cubic feet used. B. More Than One Water Customer Through A Single Meter: Each residential dwelling unit or individual commercial tenant unit will be charged for water as outlined in this section, regardless of the number of housing or commercial units that are served through a single meter. C. Users Outside City Limits: 1. Water Line And Plant Maintenance Fee: From January 1, 1984, forward, a water line and plant maintenance fee shall be charged at the rate of six dollars and seventy cents ($6.70) per month to be paid with each water bill, and upon the same terms, conditions and enforcements for each water service meter registration outside of the City; with said water line and plant maintenance fee being established herein by reason of the additional costs, which may vary from time to time, incurred by the City in maintaining and servicing a water delivery system not within its boundaries. D. Bulk Water Rates: Bulk water rates are $50.00 per load. 7-5-5-2: BILLS FOR SERVICE; DELINQUENCIES: A. Rendition Of Bills; Payment, First Notice: First notice bills for water furnished shall be mailed on or about January 1, March 1, May 1, July 1, September 1, and November 11 of each year, and all first notice bills and charges for water usage and other services are payable at the office of the Finance Director within 30 days of the date of mailing. Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 7 B. Delinquent Bills, Second Notice: After 30 days from the mailing of the first bill and the bill not being paid a delinquent second notice bill shall be mailed. The delinquent second notice bill amount shall be ten percent (10%) greater than the first notice bill amount. The second notice bill shall be due ten (10) days from its date of mailing. C. Shut-off Of Water Service For Nonpayment; Turn-on Fee; Payment Plan: If a delinquent bill is not paid before its due date, the water service may be shut off from the premises, and shall not be turned on until all back charges are paid, together with a fifty dollar ($50.00) fee for turning on the water when service is located within the City limits; said fee shall be fifty dollars ($50.00) plus all back charges when service is located beyond the City limits; provided however, at the discretion of the City Finance Director, a water service customer may enter into a payment plan with the City in order to avoid water shutoff. In this event the customer pays a portion of the delinquent charges as determined by the City Finance Director, so long as all delinquent sums are paid in full within not more than eighteen (18) months, the City shall charge a ten (10%) percent penalty every two months on the past due balance. Nothing in this section shall obligate the City to enter into a payment plan with a water service customer. 7-5-5-3: RESPONSIBILITY OF WATER SERVICE CUSTOMER: Water service accounts and charges shall be kept in the name of the owner of the property served, except as to property owned by the state of Illinois. Only such owner shall be recognized as the consumer, except where the tenant has the account in his/her name. When the account is in the name of the tenant, the owner of the premises served shall be held responsible for the payment of all water rentals and all other proper charges in connection with water services to said premises. Such payments shall be accepted from tenants if tendered by them, but accepting payments from tenants shall not subsequently relieve the owner of the premises from the responsibility of paying water rentals or other service charges when due or relieve the real estate from the lien hereinbefore provided. Any deposit made upon application for service shall be returned to consumer upon termination of service. If the bill for a building with multiple units and a single meter with one owner who pays the bill for all of the units is delinquent, the City may shut-off the entire building as provided in Section 7-5-4-7. 7-5-6: WATERWORKS REVENUE: A. Duties Of Finance Director: 1. Monies To: All money due the water department from all purposes and sources, including the collection of water usage charges, shall be paid to the Finance director. 2. Custodian Of Funds: The Finance Director shall be custodian of the funds derived from income received from the waterworks system, and shall be bonded for the faithful discharge of his duties. The Finance Director shall maintain separate accounts as is necessary or required by law. B. Water Fund: All revenue derived from the sale of water as herein provided shall be kept separate and apart by the Finance Director from the other revenue of the City. Said money Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 8 shall be known as the water fund and shall be used for the maintenance, extension, improvement and operation of said waterworks, the retirement of waterworks bonds and certificates, and under no circumstances shall this revenue be diverted to any other purpose unless authorized by City Council at any time. 7-5-7: CHANGE OF RESIDENCE BY WATER SERVICE CUSTOMERS: No person, either owner or tenant, who, in changing his residence from one location to any other location served by the water department, shall be given water service until any and all delinquent water usage fees which are charged against him at his former place of residence shall have been paid in full, and no water at the new location shall be turned on and, if so, the same shall be turned off until settlement of such delinquent water rental at the former location is made. A charge of fifty dollars ($50.00) for turning on water and renewing service shall be made, in addition to the payment of the delinquent water usage or charges. 7-5-8: WATER SHUTOFFS AND TURNONS: A. Authority To Shut-Off Water; Non-liability: The City shall not be held responsible by reason of the breaking of any service pipe or apparatus, or for failure to supply water. The City, when necessary, without notice, may shut the water off in its mains for the purpose of making repairs or extensions or for other purposes. The City shall not be liable by reason of the breakage of any service pipe or service cock, or from other damage that may result from the shutting off of water for repairing, laying or relaying mains, hydrants or other connections. B. Requests For Water Shut-off And Turn-on: 1. Water Shut-off: Owners or consumers when they pay for water service desiring to discontinue the use of water shall give notice thereof, in writing, to the Director of Public Works, or his designee, who shall then cause the water to be turned off. Water usage or charges for services shall continue until such notice is given. 2. Water Turn-on: In turning on water, the City shall not be responsible for any damage that may occur by reason of improper fixtures, open or improper connections, or for any other causes. 7-5-9: PROHIBITED ACTS AND CONDITIONS: A. Electrical Grounding To Water System: It shall be unlawful for any person to ground an electrical system to the water supply system. B. It shall be the duty of all consumers of city water at any and all times to exercise due diligence to prevent waste of the water supply and to this end shall stop any leaks on their premises. The city water supply will be shut off from any and all premises until such violation of this rule is corrected. C. Use Of Ground Water Prohibited: Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 9 1. Prohibited: The use or attempt to use as a water supply, ground water from within the corporate limits of the United City of Yorkville by the installation or drilling of wells or by any other method is hereby prohibited within the City. 2. Reserved 3. Definitions: PERSON: Any individual, partnership, firm, company, limited liability company, corporation, association, joint stock company, trust, estate, political subdivision, or any other legal entity, or their legal representative, agents, or assigns. POTABLE WATER: Any water used for human or domestic consumption, including, but not limited to, water used for drinking, bathing, swimming, washing dishes, or preparing foods. 4. Memorandum Of Understanding: The Mayor of the United City of Yorkville is hereby authorized and directed to enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Illinois environmental protection agency ("Illinois EPA") in which the United City of Yorkville assumes responsibility for tracking the remediation sites, notifying the Illinois EPA of changes to the ordinances, and taking certain precautions when siting public potable water supply wells. 5. Resale of Water Prohibited: No water shall be resold or distributed by the recipient thereof from the City supply to any premises at a rate other than that charged by the City. A person who resells water from the City supply shall not add any additional costs or charges to the rate charged by the City, other than any applicable administrative fee. The billing statement shall include any applicable administrative fee as a separate line item on the bill. The line item for the administrative fee shall also include the name of the entity that is charging the fee. Any billing statement for water resale shall solely be in the name of the reseller or his or her assigns. The billing statement shall not include any references to the City or the City’s logo. Damage to or Tampering with System: It is unlawful for any person not authorized by the Director of Public Works to tamper with, alter, or injure any part of the City’s waterworks or supply system or any meter. 7-5-10: REGULATIONS FOR DEVELOPERS: A. Public Water Supply for Subdivisions: No subdivision of land in the corporate limits shall be approved by the City Council unless the lots therein are provided with adequate water connections with the City water system. Water connections and City water main extensions, if necessary in order to connect to the City water system, shall be at the subdivider's expense but under the direct supervision and control of the Director of Public Works. Prior to the time said extension is undertaken, the subdividers shall pay the cost of said extension. Upon completion, any extension shall be dedicated to the City and become property of the City who shall then assume full responsibility for maintenance and repairs of the same. Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 10 B. Water System Improvements: The standards and specifications from Title 11, subdivision control ordinance, of this Code shall be used for contiguity and construction. 1. Where improvements and extensions to the water distribution system are required in order to serve the needs of a development, the developer shall bear all costs of the water main installation. 2. Prior to proceeding with construction, the developer shall prepare and submit plans and specifications to all governmental agencies as required by law for permits or approvals. The contractor shall also submit plans and specifications to the Director of Public Works and shall obtain written approval and a permit before proceeding with construction. The following requirements shall be met: a. Plans and specifications submitted shall bear the seal of a current registered Professional Engineer. b. Water mains shall be not less than eight inches (8") in diameter. c. Fire hydrants shall be set at each intersection and at intervals not to exceed four hundred feet (400') (whichever results in closer spacing). d. All future water mains shall be constructed of ductile iron. Ductile iron valves and appurtenances shall be used whenever possible; however, the Director of Public Works may, at his discretion, allow the use of cast iron valves and other cast iron appurtenances to the actual water pipe upon his written consent to the installer. e. Water mains shall be buried such that finished grade will provide not less than five and one-half feet (51/2') of cover and not greater than eight and one-half feet (81/2') of cover over the main. f. All water main extensions shall be designed, installed and tested in accordance with the most current edition of the "Standard Specifications for Water and Sewer Main Construction in Illinois". g. The contractor shall pay all expenses incurred by the City to provide field inspections and approval of water mains before, during and after construction. At the sole option of the City, the following procedures shall be followed: (1) Complete field inspection by the Director of Public Works or his agent, with free advice and consulting on the project by the design engineer; (2) Complete field inspection by the design engineer for the developer with periodic field checking by the Director of Public Works or his agent; Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 11 (3) Complete field inspection by the design engineer for the developer. If the City selects this option, there shall be submitted to the City a sworn statement carrying the design engineer's signature and seal stating that the water system was installed in strict accordance with the plans and specifications as approved, except as shown in the as-built drawings. h. Mylar or cloth reproducible drawings shall be submitted to the City after construction showing the system as-built. C. Installation of Oversize Mains: 1. Notice Requiring Oversized Mains; Compliance: a. When, in any subdivision now within the City or within one and one-half (11/2) miles of the City limits which normally would require an eight inch (8") size water main but which, for the purpose of complying with the plan of development of the City's water system to provide an adequate water supply, not only to the particular subdivision but also to subdivisions which in the future may become a part of the City, and where the City Engineer and Director of Public Works have determined that water mains of a larger diameter than eight inches (8") and the size thereof, shall be installed, then the City Engineer or the Director of Public Works shall inform the subdividers, builders and developers of the subdivision by a written notice of that fact and require them to install such oversized water mains and at the same time, in said notice, inform them of the size to be installed. b. Upon being notified as provided for in this subsection, no subdivider, builder or developer shall install any water main in such subdivision of any size other than that specified to him by the aforesaid notice. 2. Costs: At such time as the installation of said oversized water main pipe shall have been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to the City for such installation, and also in accordance with the notice specified in this subsection, and all such installations shall have been inspected and approved by the City as provided for by ordinance of the City, then the City will pay any such subdivider, builder or developer who has installed oversized water main pipe as above provided or approve a recapture ordinance, the difference of the cost at current prices, as of the time of said installation, between the eight inch (8") main pipe which was originally planned to be used and the cost of the oversized pipe which the City directed to be used. 7-5-12: PRIVATE SPRINKLER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS: Private sprinkler and fire protection water systems may be connected with the City water mains subject to the following provisions and regulations and provided the applicant is a consumer taking water supply for other uses from the City at regular rates for such uses: A. Application for Service; Approval: Whenever sprinkler or fire protection services are desired, application shall be made for the privilege of installing such service, which application shall include complete specifications, adherence to the current City Codes and plans of the installation Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 12 contemplated. If said application is approved by the City Council, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for connection to City mains, subject to the provisions of this Chapter. B. Inspection of System: 1. City water will be turned into any sprinkler or fire protection system only when such installation shall have been subjected to and passed such inspection and pressure tests as may be required by the Director of Public Works. All pipes in connection with such system shall be left exposed until such tests have been made and the system approved. No cross-connections between private water supplies and services connected to City mains shall be permitted. 2. Any and all premises connected to City water mains for sprinkler or fire protection services shall be subject to inspection by the Director of Public Works at any time for count and conformity to the City regulations. 7-5-13: WATER CUSTOMER CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT: The rules and regulations as set forth in this chapter shall be considered a part of the contract of every person who takes water supplied by the City through the City Waterworks. Every such person who takes water shall be considered as having expressly agreed to be bound by the provisions of this chapter upon his acceptance of water service from the City. 7-5-14: Reserved 7-5-15: WATER CONSERVATION REGULATIONS: A. Definitions: The following words and phrases when used in this section shall, for the purpose of this section, have the following meanings: CITY: The United City of Yorkville. DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM: A soaking hose that when in use does not result in an actual dissipation of water. DRIP LINE: Pertaining to a tree or shrub, the ground area immediately beneath the branches of the tree or shrub. LANDSCAPE/LANDSCAPING: Sod and seeded turf lawns, gardens, trees, shrubs, and other living plants. PERMITTED HOURS OF WATER USE: A time period between five o'clock (5:00) A.M. and nine o'clock (9:00) A.M., and between nine o'clock (9:00) P.M. and twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight, each day. PERSON: Any individual, firm, partnership, association, corporation, company, organization, or entity of any kind. Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 13 WATER: The water provided by and obtained by a person from the City water supply and distribution system. B. Application: 1. The provisions of this section shall apply to all persons using water, and to all properties within the City or unincorporated areas which are connected to the City's water supply and distribution system, regardless of whether any person using the water has a contract for service with the City. 2. The provisions of this section shall apply annually from May 1 through September 30, subject to any modifications thereof, including application of these or other regulations during this or any other time, by an emergency proclamation issued pursuant to subsection C of this section. C. Restricted Hours And Days For Specified Uses: 1. Water may be used for landscape watering or the filling of swimming pools only as follows: a. All properties with even numbered street numbers (i.e., numbers ending in 0, 2, 4, 6 or 8) may use water for landscape watering or for pool filling, only on even numbered calendar dates during permitted hours of water use. c. All properties with odd numbered street numbers (i.e., numbers ending in 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9) may use water for landscape watering or for pool filling only on odd numbered calendar dates during permitted hours of water use. d. There shall be no restrictions as to hours or days when water may be used for any of the following: (1) Landscape watering or sprinkling where such watering or sprinkling is done by a person using a handheld watering device; (2) Filling swimming pools with a volume of fifty (50) gallons or less; (3) The automatic watering of trees and shrubs by means of automatic root feed or drip irrigation systems within the drip line of the tree or shrub; or (4) Vehicle and equipment washing; or (5) Any other lawful use of water such as bathing, clothes washing, and other normal household uses not otherwise specifically restricted by the provisions of this section. D. Restrictions For Sod Laying And Lawn Seeding For New Lawns: Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection C of this section, the following special regulations shall apply: 1. Sod laying, lawn seeding, and the planting of other landscaping for the establishment of a new lawn or new landscaping is prohibited from July 1 through August 31 each year Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 14 unless the source of watering for said sod, lawn seeding and/or planting of landscaping is derived from a private well, imported water source or means other than any municipal water source. 2. From May 1 through June 30 and from September 1 through September 30, water may be used on new lawns (sod or seed), only as follows: a. Prior to sod laying or lawn seeding, a sod watering permit shall be obtained from the Director of Public Works. b. On the day new sod or seed has been placed on a property, a person may use an automatic sprinkling device to apply water to the sod or seed for a total period of time not to exceed eight (8) hours. c. For the next nine (9) days thereafter, a person may apply water to said sod or seed each day during permitted hours of water use. d. Following the first ten (10) days after the sod or seed is placed, the provisions of subsection C of this section shall apply. 3. Prior to the execution of any real estate contract for the sale of newly constructed property, the builder or owner of such new construction shall: a. Inform prospective purchasers of the restrictions upon the installation of new lawns set forth in this section; b. Attach a copy of these regulations to the contract; and d. Obtain the signature of the purchaser(s) on a statement that he/she or they has /have been informed of the new lawn installation restrictions set forth in this section. 4. The applicant for a certificate of occupancy for any newly constructed property shall submit as a part of his application, and as a condition of issuance of such certificate, a copy of said signed statement. When an application for certificate of occupancy is submitted prior to sale of the property, and the future occupant is unknown, the applicant shall submit his signed statement that he shall comply with the requirements of this section at the time the real estate contract is executed. E. Waste Of Water Prohibited: No person shall allow a continuous stream of water to run off into any gutter, ditch, drain, or street inlet while using water for restricted purposes during the permitted hours of water use. F. Exceptions: The provisions of this section shall not apply to any commercial or industrial entity for which use of water is necessary to continue normal business operations, or to maintain stock or inventory. Provided, however, this exception shall not apply to any and all uses of water not essential to normal business operations or maintenance of inventory or stock, and specifically shall not apply to landscape watering or pool filling. Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 15 G. Bulk Water Rates: Bulk water rates shall be increased to three (3) times the nonresident water rate during the time described in subsection B of this section. H. Hydrant Use Prohibited: Hydrants connected to the City water supply and distribution system for the purpose of providing water for firefighting purposes shall not be opened by any person, other than authorized City or Fire District personnel, except for the purpose of fighting a fire. I. Emergency Proclamation: 1. Whenever the water supply of the City is diminished from any cause, including, but not limited to, prolonged dry period, increased water demand, equipment failure, or water quality concerns, to an amount which in the opinion of the City Engineer or Director of Public Works is or is likely to become dangerous to the health and safety of the public, the City Mayor is hereby authorized and empowered to issue an emergency proclamation specifying different or additional regulations on the use of water. 2. Such regulations may provide for limitations on the usage of water, limitations on days and hours of use of water for some or all purposes, and the prohibition of specified uses of water. 3. Upon issuing such proclamation, the Mayor shall make the contents thereof known to the public by posting a copy at the City Hall, and by news release to local newspapers and radio media, and may also endeavor to notify the City residents and other persons in any other practical manner that he or she shall devise. Further, the City Mayor shall immediately deliver notice of such proclamation, and the regulations that have been imposed by such proclamation, to all members of the City Council. 4. The emergency proclamation of the Mayor, and the regulations imposed thereby, shall remain in full force and effect until any one of the following shall first occur: a. The Mayor determines that the emergency no longer exists and that the emergency proclamation, and the regulations imposed thereby, shall no longer continue in effect. b. The City Council modifies or repeals the emergency proclamation, and the regulations imposed thereby, by means of an ordinance enacted at any regular or special meeting of the City Council. c. The first regular meeting of the City Council occurring more than thirty (30) days after the date of the emergency proclamation of the Mayor. 5. Any City employee or officer may, at the direction of the City Mayor, notify and warn any person of the effect of said emergency proclamation and direct said person to comply with said watering or sprinkling restrictions. If any said person, after having first been warned about said restrictions of the emergency proclamation, fails to comply with the water restrictions, the person shall be deemed to be in violation of this section. J. Restriction On Permanent Landscape Watering Systems Of Nonresidential Properties: Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 16 1. This subsection J shall apply only to nonresidential properties, and common and/or open space areas of residential developments. 2. For this subsection J, a "permanent landscape watering system" shall be defined as any system of pipes, sprinkler heads or similar devices installed underground to be used to provide landscape watering. 3. Landscape watering upon nonresidential properties shall be limited as follows: a. For properties with one building, a total area within the property not to exceed one acre may be watered by a permanent landscape watering system using the City's potable water. This area shall be measured by the amount of impervious surface on the property including all landscaped areas, lawn areas and green space regardless of the size of the area initially planned to be irrigated. b. For properties with more than one building, a total area within the property not to exceed three (3) acres may be watered by a permanent landscape watering system using the City's potable water. This area shall be measured by the amount of impervious surface on the property including all landscaped areas, lawn areas and green space regardless of the size of the area initially planned to be irrigated. c. For the common space and/or open space of a primarily residential development, no permanent landscape watering system shall be allowed using the City's potable water. d. All permanent landscape watering systems permitted to use the City's potable water shall be metered the same as domestic water service. No special meters will be permitted. 4. The total area to be watered shall be measured as the area within reach of any permanent device used to water landscape including, but not limited to, sprinkler heads, hoses, trenches or similar devices to water landscape. 7-5-16: INSPECTION; AUDIT; APPEAL: A. Right Of Access; Use Inspection: The United City of Yorkville and its employees and the Illinois environmental protection agency shall have ready access at all reasonable times to the premises, places or buildings where water service is supplied for the purpose of inspecting, examining and testing the consumption, use and flow of water, and it shall be unlawful for any person to interfere with, prevent or obstruct the United City of Yorkville or its duly authorized agent or the Illinois environmental protection agency in its duties hereunder. Every user of the system shall take the same upon the conditions prescribed in this section. B. Powers And Authority Of Inspectors: 1. The Director of Public Works and other duly authorized employees of the United City of Yorkville and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, bearing proper credentials and identification shall be permitted to enter all properties for the purposes of inspection, Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 17 observation, measurement, sampling, and testing in accordance with the provisions of this section. The United City of Yorkville or its representative shall have no authority to inquire into any processes, including metallurgical, chemical, oil refining, ceramic, paper, or other industries beyond that point having a direct bearing on the kind and source of discharge to the sewers or waterway or facilities for waste treatment. 2. While performing the necessary work on private properties referred to above the director of public works or duly authorized employees of the United City of Yorkville and the Illinois environmental protection agency shall observe all safety rules applicable to the premises established by the property owner or its agent, and the property owner or its agent shall be held harmless for injury or death to the United City of Yorkville employees, and the United City of Yorkville shall indemnify the company against liability claims and demands for personal injury or property damage asserted against the property owner and growing out of the gauging and sampling operation, except as such may be caused by negligence or failure of the property owner or its agent to maintain conditions as required in this chapter. 3. The Director of Public Works and other duly authorized employees of the United City of Yorkville bearing proper credentials and identification shall be permitted to enter all private properties through which the United City of Yorkville holds a duly negotiated easement for the purposes of, but not limited to, inspection, observation, measurement, sampling, repair, and maintenance of any portion of the waterworks lying within said easement. All entry and subsequent work, if any, on said easement, shall be done in full accordance with the terms of the duly negotiated easement pertaining to the private property involved. C. Access To Records: The IEPA or its authorized representative shall have access to any books, documents, papers and records of the United City of Yorkville, which are applicable to the water system, of user charges for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts and transcriptions thereof to ensure compliance with the terms of any loan obtained from the IEPA under its Public Water Supply (PWS) loan program. D. Annual Review Of Charges: The adequacy of the water service charge shall be reviewed, not less often than annually, by certified public accountants for the United City of Yorkville in their annual audit report. The water service charge shall be revised periodically to reflect a change in the local capital costs or overhead, maintenance and repair costs. E. Appeals: Users shall be provided the method for computing rates and service charges within fourteen (14) days of written request. City shall make best efforts to remedy any disagreement with the method used or the computations made within thirty (30) days of a formal written appeal outlining the discrepancies.” Section 2: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. Ordinance No. 2017-____ Page 18 Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this ______ day of ____________________, 2017. ______________________________ CITY CLERK CARLO COLOSIMO ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ ARDEN JOE PLOCHER ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ SEAVER TARULIS ________ ALEX HERNANDEZ ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this ______ day of ____________________, 2017. ______________________________ MAYOR Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number Old Business #2 Tracking Number PW 2014-74 Railroad Quiet Zones Public Works Committee – October 17, 2017 N/A N/A Direction See attached memo. Bart Olson Administration Name Department Summary Discussion of railroad quiet zones. Background This item was last discussed at the January 2017 Public Works Committee meeting. At that meeting, the Committee reviewed the attached materials and chose not to move forward with the Quiet Zone engineering agreement. This agenda item was requested by Alderman Plocher. Recommendation Staff requests direction from the committee on the topic. Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: October 12, 2017 Subject: Railroad Quiet Zones Summary Consideration of approval of quiet zone engineering contracts. Background This item was last discussed at the December Public Works Committee meeting. The materials from that meeting are attached. At that meeting, the committee asked for records of railroad and train horn complaints for the past few years. Staff has attached a few hundred pages of emails from residents, survey responses, facebook posts, and other related information submitted by residents. Due to the timeframe of the search and the breadth of applicable emails, I have not completed my search of emailed complaints. I had some mail archiver and computer issues this week and so I was only able to compile emails from one search of the archiver system. As I am able to complete the search, we will issue a supplemental packet of emails. I have spoken with one resident of the White Oak subdivision who indicated a dozen or so residents would be present at the meeting to discuss their experiences. This same group has circulated a petition, which was forwarded to the City Council last week. Erin Willrett has also drafted a memo briefly outlining the steps taken by a few entities which have recently implemented quiet zones, and a map of quiet zones on the BNSF and Union Pacific lines. We have not yet identified an entity that has gone through the process of closing entire crossings and received state funds for doing so. Recommendation Staff still recommends approval of the engineering contracts, but is requesting discussion on the matter. Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: January 12, 2017 Subject: Railroad Quiet Zones Summary Discussion of the agreement for professional services for the proposed Quiet Zone at the BNSF and IR rail lines. Background The City discussed the process of Quiet Zone creation in June, 2015. At that time Council did not move ahead with the initial studies. Recently, after more numerous resident complaints and increased traffic along the IR rail line staff has asked EEI to propose an Agreement for a Quiet Zone study along both rail lines within the City. EEI has successfully completed the establishment of Quiet Zones in Aurora/Sugar Grove Township, Sugar Grove and Plano. This study would provide a preliminary investigation and a current risk index for the proposed Quiet Zones, as well as initial coordination with the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) and both rail lines. This initial study will provide staff and Council more information on if, when and how the City will move forward with a proposed Quiet Zone. Recommendation Staff recommends moving forward with an Agreement for Professional Services with EEI for a Quiet Zone Study on both the BNSF and IR rail lines in the United City of Yorkville at the City Council meeting in January, 2017. Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: December 15, 2016 Subject: Quiet Zone Proposal for Consulting Engineering Services for both BNSF and IR Rail Lines