Loading...
Economic Development Packet 2003 02-20-03 J 0 United City of Yorkville .1 County Seat of Kendall County Est 1836 800 Game Farm Road ,< Cl) Yorkville, Illinois 60560 O _J p Phone:630-553-4350 1/ KL v2 Fax:630-553-7575 `tLE \‘' AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, February 20, 2003 7:00 p.m. City Hall Conference Room 1. Approval/Correction of Minutes: January 16, 2003 2. Building Permit Reports - January 2003 3. PC 2001-06 Grande Reserve: MPI-2 Yorkville North LLC, MPI-2 Yorkville Central LLC, and MPI-2 Yorkville South LLC, petitioners, have filed an application with the United City of Yorkville requesting annexation to the United City of Yorkville and rezoning from Kendall County A-1 Agricultural to United City of Yorkville R-2 Planned Unit Development. The real property consists of approximately 1,127.30 acres and is located South of Galena Road and North of Route 34, Bristol Township, Kendall County, Illinois. 4. PC 2002-31 Deere Crossing: B & B Land Development, LLC, petitioners, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois requesting 1 % Mile Review for Kendall County RPD-2 Residential Planned Development - Two. The real property consists of approximately 36.878 acres and is located on Immanuel Road at the Southwest corner of Section 17, Kendall Township, Kendall County, Illinois. 5. PC 2002-32 Landford Lakes: Montalbano Homes, petitioners, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois requesting final plat approval. The real property consists of approximately 13.6 acres and is located at Landmark Center, Rt. 34 and Rt. 47. 6. Text Amendment for R-3 Zoning 7. Additional Business Page 1 of 3 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE DRAFT THURSDAY, JANUARY 16, 2003 7 P.M. IN ATTENDANCE: Committee members Mike Anderson, Richard Sticka, Valerie Burd and Joe Besco; City Administrator Tony Graff; Chad Gunderson and Dirk Gunderson with the Kylyn's Ridge subdivision; and Alan Brauer with Land Vision. MINUTES Minutes from the December 19 Downtown Plan Presentation and the December 19 Economic Development Committee meetings were approved. Building Permit Report The committee members reviewed the December 2002 building permit reports. PC 2002-12 Kylyn's Ridge Chad Gunderson said they are looking for fmal plat approval for Phase 1 of the subdivision development which includes the first 55 lots on the east side of High Ridge Road. It also includes work on the detention area. Gunderson said of the 55 lots, 50 will be buildable. The other five lots won't be buildable until the lift station is ready. Gunderson also said that all of the changes that involve the plat have been made. However, there are some changes suggested by city engineer Joe Wywrot regarding engineering that have not been made. He said the developers plan to meet with Wywrot next week to discuss the suggestions by Wywrot. Committee Chairman Richard Sticka said that the Plan Commission gave unanimous approval to the fmal plat at its January meeting. Committee Member Mike Anderson said doesn't mind approving the final plat as long as Joe Wywrot's comments are met. Gunderson said that comments made by City Planner Mike Shoppe regarding the plat have been met. He added that if the developers cannot convince Wywrot that their way is better, they will agree to his comments on the engineering issues. The committee agreed to forward the fmal plat approval to the next Committee of the Whole meeting. Page2of3 PC 2002-29 Bowman Property Alan Brauer with Land Vision presented the plan for a subdivision called Ravine Woods. Brauer was before the committee on behalf of Inland Real Estate Development Corporation who requested a 1 1/2-mile review for Kendall County RPD-3. The property consists of approximately 32 acres near the corner of Route 71 and Hilltop Road. Brauer said18 lots are planned in the subdivision, with each lot the size of more than 35,000 square feet. The largest lot is 47,000 square feet, which exceeds the county's maximum allowable lot size of 45,000 square feet, so the developers will ask for a variance, he said. The planned subdivision will feature 12 acres, or 32 percent, of open space, he said. The main drainage will come through the middle of the property. Brauer added that homes will be serviced by wells and septic systems. The right-of-way will be 70 feet with 28 feet of back-to-back curb and gutter. Committee Member Joe Besco asked if a turn lane from Route 71 would be needed. Brauer said the developers have had discussions with the Illinois Department of Transportation. IDOT suggested the entrance to the subdivision be moved 20 feet to the south. Besco asked how that would affect the lots and Brauer said he was not sure. He said it depends on the soils and the septics. Sticka asked if there was a ravine on the property since the name of the proposed subdivision is Ravine Woods. Brauer said it was just the name that the developers came up with. Sticka informed the committee that the Plan Commission gave its recommendation for approval at the January meeting. Anderson asked if there was a possibility of the property eventually being annexed to the city. Brauer said he didn't know. City Administrator Tony Graff said the city's plan for water and sewer services don't extend that far. He added that the city attorney suggested the city only ask for an annexation agreement when there are city facilities serving the site, or future plans for the city to service the site. The committee recommended that the review go before the Committee of the Whole. PC 2002-30 Tucek Property No one representing the Tucek family attended the meeting. Ronald Tucek, the petitioner, requested a 1 1/2—review for Kendall County RPD-2. The property consists of approximately 51 acres and is located on the west side of High Point Road. Sticka commented that the review given a recommendation by the Plan Commission. Page 3 of 3 He said there are two entrances to the planned subdivision because Long Grove Road goes to the Maple Grove Subdivision and loops around. Graff said that there is an existing homestead on the property that is staying. He also said there is 21.83 acres of open space planned in the proposed development. He added that the subdivision right of ways will be 66 feet. Sticka asked if Kendall County was asking developers to put in trails. Graff said the developer seemed very favorable to putting in trails. Committee Member Valerie Burd asked if the city would like to see trails as part of every subdivision and Sticka answered yes. The committee agreed to send the review to the Committee of the Whole. The meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Minutes respectfully submitted by Dina Gipe BUILDING PERMIT REPORT City of Yorkville January 2003 ...................................................................... Types of Permits Number of Permits Issued SFD 2-Family Multiple-Family Commercial Industrial Miscellaneous Total Construction Cost January 2003 36 24 0 0 1 0 11 $6,505,969.00 Calendar Year 2003 36 24 0 0 1 0 11 $6,505,969.00 Fiscal Year 2002 r 2 601 213 4 2 30 1 351 $46,241,058.00 January 2002 34 15 2 0 5 0 12 $3,843,700.00 Calendar Year 2002 2 34 15 2 0 5 0 12 $3,843,700.00 Fiscal Year 2001 3 4 5 393 148 9 3 22 2 207 $46,924,619.00 January 2001 16 j 8 0 1 0 0 7 $1,343,700 Calendar Year 2001 16 8 0 1 0 0 7 $1,343,700 Fiscal Year 2000 6 7 242 108 2 1 5 0 141 $21,712,062 t _ January 2000 9 2 0 0 0 0 7 $271,200 Calendar Year 2000 9 2 0 0 0 0 7 $271,200 Fiscal Year 1999 8 172 61 4 1 8 0 121 $15,453,911 January 1999 4 2 0 0 0 0 2 $366,599 Calendar Year 1999 4 2 0 0 0 0 2 $366,599 Fiscal Year 1998 171 27 1 0 3 1 127 $16,219,023 I The SFD permit issued in August as Y-2002-579 was voided and reissued as Y-2002-691 in October. To maintain a correct count,it shall remain on the August 2002 count. 2 Permit Numbers Y-2002-034, Y-2002-467,and Y-2002-579 were voided,thus only 806 of 809 assigned permit numbers were actually issued. J Permit Number 01490 was voided,thus only 583 of 585 assigned permit numbers were actually used. Also,Permit Number 01478 was for 4 Attached SFDs(Town/romes);reissued as Permits 01478A,B,C,and D. Also,Permit Number 01480 was for 6 Attached SFDs;reissued as Permits 01480A,B,C,D,E,and F. 4 Permit Number 01385 was for 6 Attached SFDs;reissued as Permits 01385A,B,C,D,E,and F. 5 Permit Number 01259 was for 4 Attached SFDs;reissued as Permits 01259A,B,C,and D. 6 Permits Number 00122,00189 and 00262 were each for 6 Attached SFDs. 7 Permit Number 00101 was voided,thus only 233 of 234 assigned permit numbers were actually issued. 8 Permit Number 99080 was for 5 Attached SFDs. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE DISCUSSION POINTS FOR GRAND RESERVE FEBRUARY 20, 2003 Land Use Plan • Overview ➢ Highlights— 1. 2,625 units on 1,126 acres 2. Density ■ Overall - 2.33 Units/Acre ■ Transitional—2.82 Units/Acre ■ Suburban— 1.28 Units/Acre 3. Neighborhoods 1, 2 and 3 4. Comprehensive Plan—Full Compliance ➢ Potential Phasing of Development • Route 34 to the tracks (Neighborhoods 9—20) • Area north of the tracks (Neighborhoods 1 — 8, including commercial) • Area southwest of Bristol Ridge Road (Neighborhoods 21- 23) • Neighborhood 24 ➢ Product mix, pricing and lot sales • Plan Commission recommendation Annexation Agreement—Review in March • Finalize Infrastructure Improvements— Terms, Funding and Timing ➢ Sanitary (Fox Metro and Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District) ➢ Water (Tower and 2 Wells) ➢ Storm Sewer (Linwood and Storybook Highlands) ➢ Streets (Function as part of overall system, minimize traffic) ➢ Roadways(Exceeding ROW width recommendations per Traffic Study) ➢ SSA • Parks and Open Space ➢ 435 acres of Open Space (38.6% of the total acreage) ➢ 144 acres Open Space Corridor total along Blackberry Creek(88 acre donation, and 56 acre regional park) ➢ Parks— 118.46 acres ✓ Regional Park ✓ 2 Community Parks ✓ 7 Neighborhood Parks ✓ Trail System ➢ Park to be delivered graded and seeded D. $2.6 million($1,000/lot for park development) ➢ Stormwater Quality • Schools ➢ Elementary School Site— Central ➢ Potential High School Campus—Neighborhood 23/Nursery Page 1 of 2 Fiscal Impact Study—Brief Overview City Council—Process and Next Steps • EDC 3/20 • Committee of Whole in April • Public Hearing—April 29 • Council Consideration—May Questions and Answers—Consensus? Page 2 of 2 Site Data Summa> t ALAI._ Po-16,1_ limp, A,_: ryn„_ s'A. 1 0, .$ _ in:limwetY gyp{ Fy TW.I bile 1126.59 100351 74 I0.F�I,.Iy 106 :�•:4 125 Pod Rued R.(LW, 38.59 1.42 11.6.9.9 no. (05. 82.66 11 kl \ & rlb•,'. � • � F.aluff ltoNl! .22.24 I,V% T.w-tan0y� 776 0279 10,06 C01111140.41 000 UAI Yglw 290 $0.11 (0,91 tab.;a X. J � OPsN Sp •lNl Ur.,YNAsA Uu1k.91 -116.71 18.76 fiinplc Fwnlly WA 2741.111 6131 i / '� `. RaukMul 621.40 53.41 Tntal ...9225 62416 10(/2x! \: t 1 , 1' �NL1GN/OANODJ.1-•r. .'4 (i.o.s Sae Dimity *1.37 O.U./Ad.GIGS U.UJI 126.Sx AL) Opo space Urn9Jnm Su,A ra LNumu,lw o,, Yv:as I Ate:.A.rn An•4 Aln. Aly Nogpho 6116,1 Rrc a,i. 1 • 4 1 •i {.', lieaideatial Ina C,„1„Nu,l,ly C(ob o.em.cA. .-- 5.111 5.10 510 --- ' "/ I Q, Ill . RnlJ:ncr Mhlinwm Mm 6x66 Tp,iar On kIJ Ic Sdwlol S Ir(PWI.\la 820 122326 :23316 7945 Sy]II Nooh9nlhoo0 T314' ,ly�ti J,,.`h kWIlhh tlrto PA!. ((tIA au IM+ 14.32 74.51 86.83 68143 -•• \r yta • 1.Ii(L' r1 - Yet 1,2&) WI. NA NA NA 9611 90 51666,60a Mlw.y mmt 111 97.17 12110 111,90 •.• I ,- •r 1f. �}?� .•:,,d,: lit' 4' Ten-Fainly 11156%7 9(1 Fl. 80 I.0 :1.50 118 Uln1,IKIr Crrrn Culurrv9ncal An:. 87.51 8732 -. 8732 1 4 .• . 'ri'silo 1I 1 ( 3 Tomlhamas NA NA NA 1170 99 Taal 174.72 10194 4)6.71 29419 142233 • S ':��� �W sits 1 ,rr"• 6 Tonnhumu NA NA NA 17311 140 1 ydy •'i• •.i•vie1 ••. .•` T,,'I -� yt" a \ r ,+ 1 ..i11‘ F 11` 7 Tamlhnna NA NA NA 24311 n4 i1 l .'S••is 7.s .vI' I n Twu•8000y I0P00 751'1, 75 Ft. i7,50 'O% \acs ��,0 , '••• ' 6`• 1 %l1 'il� � 9 Twn-Fal'lv - I(0871 13 H. 75 FI 21679 511 I All pmmrn,rl�xr,JjKa4 to r.14.1.11 C 11).116219+,S mll 4 e ns s , " ♦,� l T• � F +' 10 Tannho t. NA -4A NA 1966 "5 h+.r ',OMNI,"25 Fl.Inld.ury hut kr Iw.in�341i,w11.1 I .�" ^•0 0. ••`�5?�6I . S� x • II Tam.hano NA NA NA 13.16 '(M ` ' , ��rr/ 12 Mulli-FAndy NA NA NA 2fi74 5167 a� •` .',:•,r1ti,.'i! .••,. Y',- v/.� I) Single F4ni,y Iap9U 711 FL 75 H. 40.15 114 /\ d •.Nu)t' Qe it ,01,..., r �3 11 Single Family 10.001 ill Fl. 73 F1. 19.75 9S F• �i1'7iiiltl.l+•1 ��1 • ' :• C-Ci I' 1' 1 13 Suyle Family 11,000 70 Fl. 7S Ft. 29,12 99 1-N i{ J N. •4:1.,-.,,.1., ). • I r'' 16 Sms4<Fwnily 11,000 75 U. 96 FI. 12.1,2 90 •1••sC �. 1 �•��'. I1, _1'o'Z.. 17 Single flintily 1119711 75 F1, 911 U. fYAs 54 li.i•• •- 6••t• s,• ,m• •.1 I I • C I ° 18 Single Fanly 125970 II FI, 95 F. 47'3 '21 j 17: • .r 1:! jr+ •1n 4 r1(i5 iirrof• 1 n I. -1 '� 19 Slogk Fwotly 123100 101 Fl. 9S I I. 24]9 61 r� 'l ' C :U Singk Fmlily il,lx7u 75(, %0 Fl 1"hl 102 _ 1i• �7 lei•�I !,� ��i L...�, '�' `2 21 Sulg6•Fumiiy L5x7n %O Ft. NSfr ns.%] 171 :'"�4i-,1 h7 !c 's r , /,� ,I _ 1 22 S ogle Fanuly 12,1x01 60 Ft. $5 FI 2164 59 • �P1© •i\• 4 23 Single Lmuly 1'2.000 %C FI. 33 FI. 23.91 59 --r� 21 Singk F.•n6y 41(5001 1101 Ft. i(0,hl. _4,011. ..._t. -�.e i r�•'i/• 1 Taal d14.(2 2925 + _ _' _Nuell4D .E i141,1:.s el P L.'a]IIJW] a T. .l Ndl0NIORN000 i i Y610e°D 6 f ft w" , ///�/1X'0 P (rye .1 *amour* ) R E. '''/'/,/% j- �/��/�0 4 .., .Ill .-..---,'/,'14-" j�-f h, ia.' / //�/ / �/j j r e lib ` NpQM/ORN000 •7 ,•.,,. " _�- xolr l)./, /�//j/ t�... % won )'C, . .';'-'•. :',.(''4:'.;'7./.7%,' / s>»- Iii �4i. / NGON$ 11 111/ �-; `,T /� ''r ...1 P /� ,�f�///�/i //// �� i ` F4YlOMi0RN000 11 ./� t --- • R I dA,` --- - "'i M`r ., ..,_...... 6046-vau7t7 i i Oa `'�, _ill /art kl ii �_ 1. 4,%,A4‘/•ii/' ��r /��![��1 � , ry_, � �` ��i �.IIII OS nos *eV. ��. ALAI . ` . :::, 77:1" \, .di'5';:•'.1-2' ',fTr'ik,11111 & r-H---1. aims ;Lt., r.,_ .., .,,r.trAgi\,2_,.1 • 1 ` 8UH0147310N TS. am rBIACK119/161'OAKS A 2, - ♦ rr \'J ,. 111 a+-*�A NON. ���j`,,>,n i111_4� v/i A . :.:C'';3''''•,.. g: /lel-NCJQHDO FOOD 21 i •�.1+�•�, •,� , •1•�.7`•••!.�I ., ',4c,:.),,....d •■ • �•''4• 4A .0_, -1 , •,:,. ..,....,,,,,•,....;•;,,•::., Ate* :\ ' Ir./( 1� � V'1■■►�, �1 / �� $ /r� N �� 1 \■ # %* W fW (w; _::\♦ , � '' u�: \�L � 4' ,Mfr lib 1 44 eill ,-2 2 ,,,IPiricy- s._.,, ,,,, , • t L. i, ', . �.,♦.,,,'/ • ...,,,,,/,,, ; •. 4� .'♦,' '�,, , y`'+,,,". ll lIP♦� ij _grxoo :it ', m., � lVr . , 010 • f% • • y#zi- / ?r,4' .:1,:-*:.:,,,I.:11.‘ r,. f 51 r 1" i►'• 't R 04lon• Jot,No, 3500 %• • , MPI - Yorkville . Concept Plan :EN LAND DESIGN, INC. 4 1 • I F, Seds N.T.S 5 5 Plainfield Pnnd `_suite I - .. ;I' 1 'c ! GRANDE RESERVE PLANNING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Dot. U2-t8-U3 'hillowbrock, it 60527 5517 N. Cumber 1.15d, Suite 906 Chi;a7o, IL 60656 IlI (630), 3;5-62.01 Yorkville, Illinois It 7117614320 lot 1717611325 Ee3 (5 JTlafleciuel #3300 MPI- Yorkville dwguVIPI\3300\sd021303.xls Site Data Acres Percent Total Site 1126.58 100.00 Perimeter Road R.O.W. 38.58 3.42 Feature Roads 22.29 1.98 Commercial 4.60 0.41 Open Space(incl. Det., Parks& Buffers) 436.71 38.76 Residential 624.40 55.43 Gross Site Density =2.33 D.U./Ac. (2652 D.U./1126.58 Ac.) Residential Area Residence Minimum Minimum Typical Buildable Neighborhood Type Lot Size Lot Width Lot Width Acres D.U. 1,2 & 3 Villas NA NA NA 68.11 290 4 Duplex 10,000 80 Ft. 80 Ft. 24.50 138 5 Townhomes NA NA NA 14.70 88 6 Townhomes NA NA NA 17.50 140 7 Townhomes NA NA NA 20.50 108 8 Duplex 10,000 75 Ft. 75 Ft. 17.50 92 9 Duplex 10,000 75 Ft. 75 Ft. 20.79 130 10 Townhomes NA NA NA 16.60 117 11 Townhomes NA NA NA 13.36 106 12 Multi-Family NA NA NA 26.74 300 13 Single Family 10,000 70 Ft. 75 Ft. 46.35 139 14 Single Family 10,000 70 Ft. 75 Ft. 28.75 85 15 Single Family 10,000 70 Ft. 75 Ft. 29.12 88 16 Single Family 11,000 75 Ft. 80 Ft. 33.62 98 17 Single Family 11,000 75 Ft. 80 Ft. 19.45 54 18 Single Family 12,000 80 Ft. 85 Ft. 47.73 123 19 Single Family 12,000 80 Ft. 85 Ft. 24.39 63 20 Single Family 11,000 75 Ft. 80 Ft. 37.61 102 21 Single Family 12,000 80 Ft. 85 Ft. 65.83 171 22 Single Family 12,000 80 Ft. 85 Ft. 23.64 58 23 Single Family 12,000 80 Ft. 85 Ft. 23.61 59 24 Single Family 40,000 100 Ft. 100 Ft. 4.00 4 Total 624.40 2625 Summary Units Acres Percent Multi-Family 300 26.74 4.28 Townhomes 615 82.66 13.24 Two-Family 376 62.79 10.06 Villas 290 68.11 10.91 Single Family 1044 384.10 61.51 Total 2625 624.40 100.00 Open Space Breakdown Suburban Transitional Area Acres Area Acres Acres Neighborhood Regional Community Clubhouse/Rec. Area 5.10 5.10 5.10 --- School Site/Park Sites 8.20 125.26 133.46 78.45 55.01 HOA Buffers 14.32 74.51 88.83 88.83 --- Stormwater Management 24.68 97.12 121.80 121.80 --- Blackberry Creek Conservation Area 87.52 ---- 87.52 --- 87.52 Total 134.72 301.99 436.71 294.18 142.53 Notes 1. All perimeter lots adjacent to existing County subdivisions will have a minimum 25 Ft. landscape buffer easement in addition to the required rear yard. (;c!D C/Ty tE o teilin EST.% 1836 1111,111 -1 9 �f��` o 1 ` United Cityof Yorkville �z<<E x‘-`• 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560 MEMO February 18, 2003 TO: Economic Development Committee FROM: Tony Graff CC: Mayor Prochaska RE: Text Amendment for R-3 Zoning Outlined below is the suggested text amendment: ACCESS TO PUBLIC STREET: Except as otherwise provided for in this Title, every residential building shall be constructed or erected upon a lot or parcel of land which abuts or has public act upon a public street unless a permanent easement of access to a public street was of record prior to the effective date hereof. TG:ead