Loading...
Public Works Packet 2003 01-27-03 r.„1) I�1 , United City of Yorkville County Seat of Kendall County EST.% m 1836 800 Game Farm Road O rU) Yorkville, Illinois 60560 , L Phone:630-553-4350 'Q SFax:630-553-7575 �i<<E PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Monday, January 27, 2003 6:30 PM City Hall Conference Room Approval/Correction of Minutes: None Presentations: None New Business: 1. Sunflower Estates Unit 3 - Bond Reduction #1 2. Yorkville Business Center Units 1, 2, & 3 - Letter of Credit Reduction 3. YBSD Easement for Sanitary Sewer River Crossing 4. Van Emmon Street Repairs 5. Fox Hill - 1728 John Street 6. Water Reports for December 2002 7. Truck Orders 8. Ordinance Vacating Utility Easement on Lot 1, Block 2 in Fox Industrial Park Unit 1 9. Revised Engineering Agreements with EEI for Water Improvements Old Business: 1. Fox Hill Subdivision Acceptance 2. Wetland Protection Ordinance 3. Sanitary System Overview • 4. Proposed Soil Erosion & Sedimentation Control Ordinance 5. Historical Street Names 6. Street Survey Update - Smith Engineering Additional Business: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE To: Tony Graff, City Administrator �_ From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer - �� Subject: Sunflower Estates Unit 3 — d Re suction No. 1 Date: December 31, 2002 Attached find a request from Inland to reduce the bond for Sunflower Estates Unit 3. I have reviewed the request and concur with two exceptions. Those exceptions are: • The street light poles have been set, but cable has not been run to the rear of the lots. I recommend that we give credit for only half the engineer's estimate of this item. • Recently we have begun reducing bonds/letters of credit to 15% of the engineer's estimate of cost for items substantially complete. I recommend that the bond for Sunflower Estates Unit 3 be reduced to $188,093.56. A summary of the bond status is as follows: Original Bond Amount: $622,501.39 Previous Reductions: $ 0.00 This Reduction: $434,407.83 Remaining Amount: $188,093.56 Please place this item on the January 27, 2003 Public Works Committee agenda for consideration. Cc: Ken Jernberg, Inland Real Estate Development Corp. 31-Dec-02 Letter of Credit/Bond Reduction Subdivision: Sunflower Estates- Unit 3 Reduction No. 1 LOC/Bond Approved Original Substantially complete Amount to remain Item Eno. Est. Letter of Credit prior to Red. No.1 after Red. No. 1 San. Sewer $105,844.00 $116,428.40 $105,844.00 $15,876.60 Watermain $92,574.00 $101,831.40 $92,574.00 $13,886.10 Storm Sewer $103,392.00 $113,731.20 $103,392.00 $15,508.80 Pavement $167,550.60 $184,305.66 $144,911.40 $46,639.83 Street Lighting $18,900.00 $20,790.00 $9,450.00 $11,812.50 Erosion Control $2,200.00 $2,420.00 $1,100.00 $1,375.00 Miscellaneous $75,449.75 $82,994.73 $0.00 $82,994.73 Totals $565,910.35 $622,501.39 $457,271.40 $188,093.56 Notes: 1) LOC/Bond amt. to be 15% of subsantially completed items plus 110% of uncompleted items. s. Inland Real Estate Development Corporation 0 2901 Butterfield Road Oak Brook,Illinois 60523 630-218-8000 Fax:630-954-5673 z ® www.inlandgroup.com/ired December 11, 2002 Joe Wywrot City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 RE: Sunflower Estates, Unit 3 Yorkville, IL Bond No. B21867156 Dear Joe: Enclosed is a copy of Cemcon's Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Costs with the improvements completed to date and a summary of our bond amounts, we would like to reduce the bond at this time. Please process the necessary paper work and present it to the City Council for approval. If you need any further information please contact me at 630-218- 8000, Ext. 5431. Sincerely, INLA P REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION .A.., / • Ken Je rns erg Construction Manage KJ/mlr Enclosures Cc: Matt Fiascone REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT SPECIALISTS Bond Reduction Subdivision Name: Sunflower Estates- Unit 3 Reduction No. 1 Bond No. B21867156 Approved Original amount Substantially complete Bond amt. to remain Item Eng. Est. for Bond Qriior to Red. No. 1 after to Red. No. 1 Sanitary Sewer $105,844.00 $116,428.40 $105,844.00 26,461.00 Watermain $92,574.00 $101,831.40 $92,574.00 23,143.50 Storm Sewer $103,392.00 $113,731.20 $103,392.00 25,848.00 Pavement $167,550.60 $184,305.66 $144,911.40 61,130.97 Street Lighting $18,900.00 $20,790.00 $18,900.00 4,725.00 Erosion Control $2,200.00 $2,420.00 $1,100.00 1,485.00 Miscellaneous $75,449.75 $82,994.73 $0.00 82,994.73 Totals $565,910.35 $622,501.39 $466,721.40 $225,788.20 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE To: Tony Graff, City Administrate From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Subject: Yorkville Business Center Bond xeduc ion Requests Date: January 2, 2003 Attached find a request from Inland to reduce the bonds for Units 1, 2, and 3 of Yorkville Business Center. I have reviewed the request and recommend the following reductions: Unit 1 Unit 1 was accepted for maintenance by the city in 1998. The bond Inland is referring to is actually for Lot 1 in Unit 1, which was supposed to be a multi-tenant building located just south of the detention basins along Route 47. The plans for this project were approved in 2000, but the project is not yet built. I recommend that the bond not be reduced. Unit 2 The amount of the bond for Unit 2 was agreed to by the city in the summer of 2000 before the plans were submitted for review. Siebert's preliminary cost estimate at that time was $162,655, which was increased by 15% (resulting in the approximate total of$187,100) hoping to cover any increases that might occur before the plans were approved. The plans were approved in May 2001 and had a corresponding cost estimate of$876,072.50. I recommend that we use the true cost estimate when considering any reductions to the bond. Based on that estimate and the work completed to date, we could reduce the bond to $174,267.28, which corresponds to a reduction of$12,832.72. A summary of the bond status is as follows: Original bond amount: $187,100.00 Minus previous reductions: $ 0.00 Minus this reduction: $ 12,832.72 Remaining bond amount: $174,267.28 Unit 3 This is the second reduction request for Unit 3. Since that time the only major work item completed was the excavation of the detention basin. Based on that work, I recommend a bond reduction to $147,336.35, which corresponds to a reduction of$210,538.98. A summary of the bond status is as follows: Original bond amount: $777,294.65 Minus previous reductions: $419,419.32 Minus this reduction: $210,538.98 Remaining bond amount: $147,336.35 Please place this item on the Public Works Committee agenda of January 27, 2003 for consideration. Cc: Ken Jernberg, Inland Real Estate Development Corp. i Inland Real Estate Development Corporation 0 2901 Butterfield Road 2 Oak Brook,Illinois 60523 630-218-8000 Fax:630-954-5673 z a www.inlandgroup.com/ired December 11, 2002 Joe Wywrot City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 RE: Yorkville Business Center Dear Joe: Enclosed is a summary of the improvements completed at Yorkville Business Center, Units 1,2,and 3. We are requesting to have the three bonds reduced for the amounts shown on the summary. Please process the necessary paper work and present it to the City Council for approval. If you need any further information please contact me at 630-218-8000, Ext. 5431. Sincerely, INLAND AL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Ken Jemberg Construction Manag KJ/mlr Enclosures Cc: Matt Fiascone REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT SPECIALISTS Bond Reduction Date: 12/10/2002 Subdivision Name: Yorkville Business Center- Unit 1 Reduction No. 2 Bond No. 6E929573 Approved Original amount Substantially complete Bond amt. to remain Item Enq. Est. for Bond prior to Red. No. 2 after to Red. No. 2 Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer $138,250.00 $159,000.00 $138,250.00 $34,562.50 Watermain Subdivision Name: Yorkville Business Center- Unit 2 Reduction No. 2 Bond No. 8E929572 Approved Original amount Substantially complete Bond amt. to remain Item Enq. Est. for Bond prior to Red. No. 2 after to Red. No. 2 Sanitary Sewer Watermain $162,655.00 $187,100.00 $151,918.00 * $49,790.20 Streets *=Surface course is$10,737 Subdivision Name: Yorkville Business Center- Unit 3 Reduction No. 2 Bond No. BE0949646 Approved Original amount Substantially complete Bond amt. to remain Item Enq. Est. for Bond prior to Red. No. 2 after to Red. No. 2 Earthwork $18,847.50 $20,732.25 $18,847.50 4,711.88 Sanitary Sewer $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 Watermain $65,833.00 $72,416.30 $65,833.00 16,458.25 Storm Sewer $245,409.00 $269,949.90 $245,409.00 61,352.25 Pavement $206,862.50 $227,548.75 $169,325.00 83,622.50 Pond Embankment $169,679.50 $186,647.45 $169,679.50 42,419.88 Totals $706,631.50 $777,294.65 $669,094.00 $208,564.75 2-Jan-03 Letter of Credit/Bond Reduction Subdivision: Yorkville Business Center- Unit 2 Reduction No. 1 Theoretical Substantially LOC/Bond Approved Original amount Complete Prior Amount to remain Item Eno. Est. for LOC/Bond to Red. No.1* after Red. No.1 San. Sewer $322,180.00 $354,398.00 $302,180.00 $67,327.00 Watermain $68,571.00 $75,428.10 $68,571.00 $10,285.65 Storm Sewer $174,817.50 $192,299.25 $174,817.50 $26,222.63 Pavement $130,906.00 $143,996.60 $110,471.50 $39,048.68 Earthwork $179,598.00 $197,557.80 $174,920.50 $31,383.33 Totals $876,072.50 $963,679.75 $830,960.50 $174,267.28 Notes: 1) LOC/Bond amt. to be 15% of subsantially completed items plus 110% of uncompleted items. *Work not completed: a) $20,000 for lift station b) $11,184.50 for tack coat &surface course c) $3750 for street lights d) $4500 for sidewalk e) $1000 for parkway trees f) $2400 for berm seeding g) $2277.50 for parkway restoration 2-Jan-03 Letter of Credit/Bond Reduction Subdivision: Yorkville Business Center- Unit 3 Reduction No. 2 LOC/Bond Approved Original amount Substantially complete Substantially complete Amount to remain Item Eno. Est. for LOC/Bond prior to Red. No.1 prior to Red. No.2* after Red. No.2 Earthwork $18,847.50 $20,732.25 $12,867.50 $12,867.50 $8,508.13 San. Sewer $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Watermain $65,833.00 $72,416.30 $65,833.00 $65,833.00 $9,874.95 Storm Sewer $249,945.50 $274,940.05 $245,409.00 $249,945.50 $37,491.83 Pavement $206,862.50 $227,548.75 $169,325.00 $169,325.00 $66,690.00 Pond Embankment $165,143.00 $181,657.30 $0.00 $165,143.00 $24,771.45 Totals $706,631.50 $777,294.65 $493,434.50 $663,114.00 $147,336.35 Notes: 1) LOC/Bond amt. to be 15% of subsantially completed items plus 110% of uncompleted items. Work not completed: a) $17,812.50 for tack coat&surface course b) $14,725 for sidewalk c) $5,000 for streetlights d) $5,980 for parkway restoration MON 16: 19 FAX 630 268 9594 SIEBERT ENGINEERS tjuuc • WHEATON AVENUE EXTENSIO Rev. 4-24-01 — Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost For: Inland Real Estate Development Corporation 2901 Butterfield Road 7 - Oak Brook, IL 60521 By: Siebert Engineers, Inc. 261 Eisenhower Lane South Lombard, Illinois 60148 SEI 45317.1 o r Item Description, Quantrty '. Untf Un rt L pst Cost A. Sanitary Sewer Improvements A-1 10" Dia. PVC, SDR 18 1,176 LF $40.00 $47,040.00 A-2 8" Dia. PVC, SDR 26 1,265 LF $18.00 $22,770.00 A-3 Manhole, Type A, 4' Dia., with Type 1 Frame & SS Lid 13 EA S 1,950.00 $25,350.00 A-4 6" Forcemain DIP with Polyethylene Encasement 42 LF $36.00 $1.512.00 A-5 4' dia. Drop MH 1 EA 53.000.00 $3,000.00 A-6 Vacuum test MH 13 LF $140.00 $1.820.00 A-7 Dewatering 1 'LS S70,000.00 $70,000.00 A-8 4" PVC SDR18-Utility Conduit, 86 LF 58.00 $688.00 A-9 Lift Station 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000.00 Subtotal = S322,180.00 B. Watermain Improvements B-1 12" Dia. D.I.W.M., Cl. 52 with Polyethylene Encasement 778 LF $25.00 $19.450.00 B-2 16" Dia. D.I.W.M., Cl. 52 with Polyethylene Encasement 610 LF $35.00 $21,350.00 B-3 6" Dia. D.I.W.M., Cl 52 with Polyethylene Encasement 178 LF $17.00 $3,026.00 B-4 6" Dia. Valve in 4' Dia. Vault 2 EA $1,300.00 $2.600.00 B-5 12" Dia. Valve in 4' Dia. Vault 2 EA $1,800.00 $3,600.00 B-6 16" Dia. Valve in 5' Dia. Vault (butterfly) 2 EA ' S2,600.00 $5.200.00 B-7 Fire Hydrant with Aux. Valve & Box 5 EA 51,600.00 $8.000.00 B-8 Mechanical fittings 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 B-9 Connect to Existing 2 EA $350.00 $700.00 B-10 Stub & Plug 4 EA S250.00 $1,000.00 B-11 Trench Backfill 43 CY $15.00 S645.00 Subtotal = $68,571.00 . ' ' ' MON 16: 20 FAX 630 26 9594 SIEBERT ENGINEERS 003 - . Storm Sewer Improvements C-1 12" Dia. RCP, CL. IV 193 LF S 14.50 $2.798.50 C-2 30" Dia. RCP 838 LF $34.00 $28,492.00 C-3 30" ADS N-12 Non-perforated pipe 1,475 LF $30.00 $44.250.00 C-4 48" Dia. RCP 1,220 LF $56.00 $68.320.00 C-5 12" RCP FES 1 EA $400.00 $400.00 C-6 48" RCP FES 1 EA $1,800.00 $1.800.00 C-7 2 Miter 45 degree bend-24" ADS N-12 Fitting 1 EA $380.00 S380.00 C-8 22.5 degree bend-24" ADS N-12 Fitting 3 EA $260.00 $780.00 C-9 Inlet, Type A with Type EJIW 7010 Frame & Grate 1 EA $550.00 $550.00 C-10 Catch Basin, Ty. C, with Type EJIW 7010 Frame & Grate 2 EA $600.00 $1.200.00 C-11 Manhole, Type A, 48" with Type I Frame & C.L. 2 EA $1,000.00 $2,000.00 C-12 Manhole, Type A, 60" with Type 1 Frame & C.L. 3 EA $1,450.00 $4,350.00 C-13 Manhole, Type A, 72" with Type 1 Frame & C.L. 5 EA 51,800.00 $9,000.00 C-14 Outlet Structure, 60" Manhole with IDOT Bridge grate 1 EA $3,000.00 $3.000.00 C-15 TV Inspection 3,657 LF $1.00 $3.657.00 C-16 Connect to Existing 2 EA $300.00 $600.00 C-17 Trench Backfill 216 CY $15.00 $3,240.00 Subtotal = $174,817.50 • D. Street Improvements D-1 Fine Grading 3,763 SY $1.00 $3,763.00 D-2 Rough Grading 3,763 SY $2.00 $7,526.00 D-3 Geotextile Fabric 3,763 SY $1.50 $5,644.50' D-4 Aggregate Subbase, Type B, 4" 3,763 SY $1.75 $6,585.25 D-5 Aggregate Base Course, Type B, 8" 3,579 SY $5.00 $17,895.00 D-6 Bit. Conc. Binder Course, Mix. B, 4.5" 3,579 SY $8.50 $30.421.50 _ D-7 Bit. Conc. Surface Course, Class I, 1.5" 3,579 SY S3.00 $10,737.00 D-8 Bit. Materials (Prime Coat) 1,181 GAL $1.25 $1,476.25 D-9 Bit. Materials (Tack Coat) 358 GAL $1.25 $447.50 D-10 Conc. Curb & Gutter, Ty. B-6.12 1,652 LF $10.00 $16.520.00 D-11 5' P.C.C. Walk, 5" thick 826 LF $15.00 $12,390.00 D-12 Parkway trees 40 EA . S250.00 $10.000.00 D-13 Street Lights 3 EA S2,500.00 $7.500.00 Subtotal = $130,906.00 E. Earthwork Improvements E-1 Berm Seeding 2 AC $1,200.00 $2.400.00 E-2 Parkway Restoration - Topsoil & Grading 911 CY $2.50 $2,277.50 E-3 Topsoil Excavation & Stockpile 5.150 CY $1.85 $9.527.50 E-4 Unsuitable Material to be Removed 100 CY $2.50 $250.00 E-5 Embankment (cut) 150.130 CY S1.10 $165.143.00 Subtotal = $179,598.00 TOTAL = 5876,072.50 YORKVILLE BUSINESS CENTER UNIT 3 5'g o' Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 1-26-01 For: Inland Real Estate Development Corporation Rev. 5-01-01 2901 Butterfield Road Oak Brook, IL 60521 By: Siebert Engineers, Inc. 261 Eisenhower Lane South Lombard, Illinois 60148 SEI #5670.3 No.: .Item Descriptionx :.Quantity°- Unit,=:.Unit Cost;. Cost A. Watermain Improvements A-1 6" Dia. D.I.W.M., Cl. 52 with Polyethylene Encasement 269 LF 517.00 54,573.00 A-2 6" Dia. Valve in 4' Dia. Vault 3 EA $1,150.00 $3,450.00 A-3 12" Dia. D.I.W.M., Cl. 52 with Polyethylene Encasement 1365 LF $25.00 534,125.00 A-4 12" Dia. Valve in 5' Dia. Vault 2 EA $1,800.00 $3,600.00 A-5 Fire Hydrant with Aux. Valve & Box 4 EA $1,600.00 $6,400.00 A-6 Mechanical fittings 1 LS $3,000.00 53,000.00 A-7 Connect to Existing 1 EA $350.00 $350.00 A-8 Stub & Plug 1 EA $250.00 $250.00 A-9 Long Sanitary Services 7 EA $650.00 $4,550.00 A-10 Trench Backfill 369 CY $15.00 $5,535.00 Subtotal = S65,833.00 B. Storm Sewer Improvements B-1 12" Dia. RCP, CL. IV 360 LF 514.50 55,220.00 B-2 15" Dia. RCP 343 LF 517.00 $5,831.00 B-3 18" Dia. RCP 294 LF 520.00 $5,880.00 B-4 21" Dia. RCP 161 LF 524.00 53,864.00 B-5 30" ADS N-12 Non-perforated pipe 2,309 LF $30.00 569,270.00 B-6 30" Dia: RCP 873 LF $32.50 S28,372.50 B-7 36" Dia. RCP 349 LF 540.00 513,960.00 B-8 ,42" Dia. RCP 850 LF $48.00 $40,800.00 B-9 30" Dia. ADS N-12 perforated tile 944 LF $32.50 530,680.00 B-10 12" RCP FES 1 EA $400.00 $400.00 B-11 21" RCP FES 1 EA 5700.00 5700.00 B-12 2 Miter 45 degree bend-24" ADS N-12 Fitting 2 EA 5380.00 $760.00 B-13 Inlet, Type A with Type EJIW 7010 Frame & Grate 2 EA 5550.00 51,100.00 B-14 Catch Basin, Ty. C, with Type EJIW 7010 Frame & Grate 2 EA $600.00 $1,200.00 B-15 Double Inlet with Neenah R-3283-B Frame & Grate 2 EA $750.00 $1,500.00 1 B-16 Double Catch Basin with Neenah R-3283-B Frame & Gra 2 EA $800.00 $1,600.00 B-17 Manhole, Type A, 60" with Type 1 Frame & C.L. 12 EA $1,450.00 $17,400.00 B-18 Manhole, Type A, 72" with Type 1 Frame & C.L. 6 EA $1,800.00 $10,800.00 B-19 TV Inspection 6,483 LF $1.00 $6,483.00 B-20 Connect to Existing 1 EA $300.00 $300.00 B-21 Trench Backfill 255 CY $15.00 $3,825.00 Subtotal = S249,945.50 C. Street Improvements C-1 Fine Grading 5,990 SY $1.00 $5,990.00 C-2 Rough Grading 5,990 SY $2.00 $11,980.00 C-3 Geotextile Fabric 5,990 SY $1.50 $8,985.00 C-4 Aggregate Subbase, Type B, 4" 5,990 SY $1.75 $10,482.50 C-5 Aggregate Base Course, Type B, 8" 5,700 SY $5.00 $28,500.00 C-6 Bit. Conc. Binder Course, Mix. B, 4.5" 5,700 SY $8.50 $48,450.00 C-7 Bit. Conc. Surface Course, Class I, 1.5" 5,700 SY $3.00 $17,100.00 C-8 Bit. Materials (Prime Coat) 1,710 GAL $1.25 $2,137.50 C-9 Bit. Materials (Tack Coat) 570 GAL $1.25 $712.50 C-10 Conc. Curb & Gutter, Ty. B-6.12 2,630 LF $10.00 $26,300.00 C-11 5' P.C.C. Walk, 5" thick 1,315 LF $15.00 $19,725.00 C-12 Parkway trees 66 EA $250.00 $16,500.00 C-13 Street Lights 4 EA $2,500.00 $10,000.00 Subtotal = S206,862.50 D. Earthwork Improvements D-1 Road Embankment 1,430 CY $2.00 $2,860.00 D-2 Parkway Restoration - Topsoil, Seeding, & Grading 5,990 SY $2.00 $11,980.00 D-3 Topsoil Excavation & Stockpile 1,950 CY $1.85 $3,607.50 D-4 Unsuitable Material to be Removed 100 CY $4.00 $400.00 D-5 Pond Embankment (cut) 0 CY $1.10 $0.00 Subtotal = $18,847.50 TOTAL = S541,488.50 Pond Embankment (cut) (constructing in Unit 2) 150,130 CY $1.10 S165,143.00 GRAND TOTAL = S706,631.50 2 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE To: Tony Graff, City Administrat From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Subject: YBSD Easement for Sanitary S wer River Crossing Date: January 9, 2003 Attached find a letter from Walter Deuchler Associates, Inc. regarding an easement they will need in order to construct the 42" gravity sewer river crossing. The easement would be located immediately west of the existing siphon chambers between State Street and Adams Street. The city recently entered into an agreement with Corlands, Inc. to acquire this property from Frank Wilman. I understand that Corlands is the current owner, and that the city will be purchasing it from them next fiscal year with a $100,000 grant supplemented by city funds. Assuming that we are willing to grant the easement, we will need to obtain sign-offs from Corlands and also IDNR, which is the administering agency for the grant. Laura Brown indicated that IDNR might require an environmental assessment before they would agree to any construction on the property. Deuchler should investigate this further. Please place this item on the January 27, 2003 Public Works Committee agenda for discussion. Cc: Ralph Pfister, YBSD Laura Brown, Director of Parks& Recreation Bill Dunn, Walter E. Deuchler Associates, Inc. WALTER E. DEUCHLER ASSOCIATES INC. Consulting Engineers 230 WOODLAWN AVENUE • TELEPHONE (630) 897-4651 • FAX (630) 897-5696 AURORA, ILLINOIS 60506 January 3, 2003 Mr. Joseph Wywrot, City Engineer United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Re: 42-Inch Sanitary Interceptor River Crossing Permanent and Temporary Easements On Hydraulic Avenue Dear Mr Wywrot: We are currently working on the plans and specifications for the proposed 42-inch siphon (gravity sewer) that will be installed immediately west of the existing Hydraulic Avenue siphons and convey the sanitary flows from the south side of Yorkville to the YBSD treatment facility. With the work at the treatment plant continuing, the timing of the construction of the new siphon has become a key issue. In order to not adversely effect the completion of the treatment plant project, we are targeting construction of the new river crossing for mid-summer. In order for this to happen, we will need to secure permanent (35-foot) and temporary (50-foot) easements on the north side of Hydraulic Avenue as quickly as possible. The enclosed sketch illustrates the necessary easements. I understand that you have either been working on securing these easements or have knowledge regarding the disposition of this property. In either case, we would appreciate knowing the current status of easement acquisition and knowing what we can do to help expedite the process. in advance, foryour helpin the matter. I would also like to wishyou and your staff a Thank you, very happy and prosperous New Year. Very truly yours, Wal - E. Deuchler Associates, Inc. William E. Dunn, P.E. Enclosure cc: Project File 777-02051-01 • Water Works and Sewerage • Buildings and Structures • Design and Construction • Streets and Street Lighting • Investigations and Reports • Project Financing / ¼!) SCALE IN FEET Qo "� e9*o �\ 0 30 60 90 N ^y By3{/4 , �s \� �w � _ � � / .T4v\ �� EXIST STORM MH ` -- RIM EL. .557...59 ,_ , -_ - - INV. 581.8k NW w \., 4 i= e2 nuiVgo2inu. • \ �� Q. �" ---6-, 4 .\.., :.,-1%: �V,0 ,_ \\ ry S2-6 mi; Y' �I 41,fr, � Or�� i 1 ..s",-,-----_„_ time. c,, \ \�.�� EXIST. STORM MH _ R/M EL SB7 10 �' EXIST STORM M//� lis. _ ty INV. EL. 583.97; N l T <' ° •A`EL. 586.50 ° _0446,1/4_, QlNV EL: 584.97; S£. AppA .1 aC2R �Y�.c1,4-TtD 17AK /NV. EL 581.8; SE f3 9e�£2 �� /�voPi✓co ✓.r*-) o �4e s S2-5 tel o 4., / ,.. 1,k,/ 1 • \®i �v UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE To: Tony Graff, City Administrato From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Subject: Van Emmon Street Repairs Date: January 13, 2003 I got a call from Fran Klaas last week regarding a proposed county project to grind, patch, and overlay Van Emmon Street from Route 71 to the eastern city limits. Fran wanted to know if the city was interested in participating in the project and extend the work to Route 47. The county is currently planning to do this work either late this year or sometime next year. The timing would depend on funding. Fran also said that he confirmed with IDOT that we could use MFT funds as long as the work within city limits was substantially similar to that performed outside city limits. We would probably have to perform non-similar items such as curb patching, detector loop replacement, curb drain repairs, etc. separately either before or after the county work is done. With the possible postponement of this year's MFT project on Countryside Parkway (due to the Countryside Interceptor construction), we should have funds available for Van Emmon. We are planning to construct a 12" watermain on Mill Street and Van Emmon this year as part of our larger water treatment project. The watermain replacements are needed to re-distribute water to the system after treatment. The watermain on both streets is proposed to be under the pavement, so participating in the county project is a great opportunity to not only cover the trench patch, but also put Van Emmon in good shape. Fran will prepare a rough cost estimate of our cost and get it to us in the next couple of weeks. Please place this item on the January 27, 2003 Public Works Committee agenda for consideration. Cc: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Traci Pleckham, Director of Finance 0 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE To: Tony Graff, City Administrator From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Subject: Fox Hill— 1728 John Street Date: January 15, 2003 Attached find a letter from Ms. Sandra Partin regarding a fire hydrant in front of her home on John Street. The hydrant is in front of her garage, requiring the driveway to curve around it. Ms. Partin is requesting help in moving the hydrant. I checked with the Building Department to see if anything could be done to avoid this type of problem in the future. There is nothing in the Building Code requiring items such as a hydrant to be identified in the building permit application. If we noticed a problem during construction of the home we could talk to the homeowner about it, but it would be too late to change the layout of the home. The hydrant was there before the house, so I don't believe the developer has any liability. The homeowner might have an argument against their builder, but it may be too late in this instance to have the builder move the hydrant. From the city's prospective we certainly don't want to have a car or the hydrant damaged, but the builder/homeowner should have realized the potential problem and changed the house layout before they applied for a building permit. Please place this item on the Public Works Committee agenda of January 27, 2003 for discussion. Cc: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Bill Dettmer, Building Inspector Joe Wyrot, As per our conversation on Jan. 14th 2003,I am writing this letter to request the movement of the fire hydrant located at the front of our property, 1728 John Street. Due to the placement of the hydrant our driveway actually turns at the base. Several cars have already struck the hydrant simply by backing out of the driveway straight. I would appreciate any resolution to this problem you might have. n Sincerely, C):7/iretai Sandra Partin tea (630)552-3106 411 Nitp or. I H 6 i _ Alt. CITY OF YORKVILLE -11.17,0 1 :p., I nowiy, of, WATER DEPARTMENT REPORT mi I. MONTH DECEMBER 31, 2002 0 WELLS WELL DEPTH PUMP DEPTH WATER ABOVE THIS MONTH'S PUMPAGE NO. (FEET) ( FEET) PUMP (FEET) (MILLION GALLONS) 3 1335 458 183 9915 4 1393 450 163 13146 TOTAL 23061 1,639,000 ❑ MORE CURRENT MONTH'S PUMPAGE IS GALLONS THAN LAST MONTH LESS 2,320,000 GALLONS 57;1LESS THAN THIS MONTH LAST YEAR DAILY AVERAGE PUMPED: 744,000 GALLONS DAILY MAXIMUM PUMPED: 878,000 GALLONS DAILY AVERAGE PER CAPITA USE: 118. 1 GALLONS WATER TREATMENT CHLORINE FED: 270 LBS. CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 1.4. MG/L FLUORIDE FED: 363.5LBS. CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 0.34 MG/L WATER QUALITY AS DETERMINED FROM SAMPLES ANALYZED BY ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY BACTERIOLOGICAL: 9 SAMPLES TAKEN 9 SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY (EXPLAIN FLUORIDE : 2 SAMPLE(S) TAKEN CONCENTRATION : 1.0 MG/L MAINTENANCE NUMBER OF METERS : 20 REPAIRED NUMBER OF LEAKS OR BREAKS REPAIRED : 2 NEW CUSTOMERS RESIDENTIAL 32 COMMERCIAL 3 INDUSTRIAL/GOVERNMENTAL V.O.C. SAMPLE WAS TAKEN DURING DECEMBER ALSO RADIUM SAMPLES COMMENTS MENARD'S PHASE III PUT ON WATER MAIN 2 WATERMAIN BREAKS REPAIRED #1 WAS ON 12/10/02 6 inch MAIN CRACKED AT 702 GAME FARM ROAD LOST 90,000 GALLONS OF WATER. #2 WAS ON 12/18/02 ON BEAVER ST ACROSS FROM BKFD LOST 120,000 GALLONS OF WATER. TOTAL WATER LOSS WAS 210,000 GALLONS OF WATER. FOR THE YEAR 2002 WE HAD TOTAL OF 18 MAIN BREAKS. 4 DECEMBER 2002 127762 12/2/02 762 FIR COURT-NEW 128339 12/30/02 339 GARDEN CIRCLE -NEW 135040 12/18/02 407 E BARBERRY CIRCLE -NEW 138120 12/2/02 1324 CORALBERRY COURT-NEW 142630 12/16/02 211 WALSH CIRCLR- NEW 145506 12/6/02 506 KELLY AVE-NEW 145559 12/19/02 559 POPLAR DRIVE -NEW 146527 12/11/02 527 KELLY AVE-NEW 146581 12/20/02 581 KELLY AVE -NEW 148584 12/3/02 584 RED HORSE LANE -NEW 203160 12/5/02 506 HEUSTIS -REPLACEMENT 261021 12/19/02 2021 MURFIELD DR-NEW 261025 12/12/02 2025 MURFIELD DR-NEW 261027 12/12/02 2027 MURFIELD DR-NEW 261029 12/19/02 2029 MURFIELD DR-NEW 302020 12/19/02 106 W RIVER-REPLACEMENT 323684 12/12/02 684 W VETERANS PKWY-NEW - COMMERCIAL 324411 12/6/02 1411 CANNONBALL TR-NEW-COMMERCIAL 344335 12/16/02 1335 CHESTNUT CIRCLE-REPLACEMENT 346412 12/18/02 1412 ASPEN LANE-NEW 349330 12/30/02 1333 CHESTNUT -NEW 356225 12/18/02 1225 EVERGREEN LANE-NEW 357207 12/19/02 1207 WILLOW WAY - NEW 357220 12/10/02 1220 WILLOW WAY-NEW 357224 12/4/02 1224 WILLOW WAY-NEW 357302 12/16/02 1302 WILLOW WAY - REPLACEMENT 401130 12/10/02 716 N BRIDGE ST-REPLACEMENT 421150 12/30/02 589 HEARTLAND DR- NEWQ 421480 12/30/02 904 HEARTLAND DR- NEW 423100 12/6/02 1224 MISTWOOD CT-NEW 423130 12/10/02 1211 MISTWOOD CT-NEW 427100 12/17/02 1092 STILLWATER COURT -NEW 607160 12/18/02 1855 MARKETVIEW DR-NEW - COMMERCIAL 736633 12/18/02 633 YELLOWSTONE - REPLACEMENT 737170 12/11/02 2222 NORTHLAND -NEW 737180 12/8/02 2203 NORTHLAND -NEW 737200 12/18/02 2195 NORTHLAND-NEW 737250 12/30/02 2184 NORTHLAND-NEW 737310 12/30/02 2112 NORTHLAND -NEW 737320 12/2/02 2107 NORTHLAND COURT-NEW 737430 12/11/02 2078 NORTHLAND COURT-NEW )ATE 123102 [UBU] UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE SYS TIME 11:21 REGULAR BILL REGISTER / UPDATE fTE 12/31/02 TUESDAY DECEMBER 31,2002 PAGE 481 !STEM 123102 TIME 11:21 FROM TO 1ER SERV RATE SEQ DESCRIPTION READING READING CONSUMPTION AMOUNT TAX PENALTY EST • )TAL NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS LISTED IS 2842 '* GRAND TOTAL ********* 'OTAL PREV BAL $51,143.90 'OTAL BILLED $447,397.98 'OTAL NET $498,541.88 OTAL PENALTY $44,279.50 'OTAL GROSS $542,821.38 SERVICE / RATE UNITS CHARGE # OF BILLS TAX ***** TOTAL D / COM 0 2196.00 122 TOTAL S / COM 672135 13071.60 123 TOTAL W / CL1 740625 16864.39 148 TOTAL D / RE5 0 90.00 1 TOTAL S / RE5 5100 380.56 1 TOTAL W / RE5 5100 132.36 1 TOTAL D / RES 0 42982.40 2425 TOTAL S / RES 3647278 181868.66 2423 TOTAL W / RE1 3747728 92350.12 2453 TOTAL D / CL3 0 486.00 9 TOTAL S / CL3 32100 2055.06 9 TOTAL W / CL3 23200 545.75 3 TOTAL D / CL2 0 504.00 14 TOTAL S / CL2 13700 2131.08 14 TOTAL W / CL2 4400 188.73 6 TOTAL R / SRD 0 2021.61 231 TOTAL R / FEE 0 21652.78 2015 TOTAL W / OUT 124400 3539.28 76 TOTAL D / CL5 0 900.00 10 TOTAL S / CL5 49590 3805.40 10 TOTAL W / CL5 12600 295.11 1 TOTAL D / RE4 0 432.00 6 TOTAL S / RE4 19000 1826.64 6 TOTAL W / RE4 19000 533.70 6 TOTAL D / RE2 0 324.00 9 TOTAL R / RE2 0 196.20 9 TOTAL S / RE2 21000 1369.98 9 TOTAL W / RE2 21000 535.90 9 TOTAL M / TRN 0 300.00 12 TOTAL M / 999 0 173.81 2 TOTAL R / SR2 0 35.60 1 TOTAL D / GOV 0 234.00 13 TOTAL S / GOV 164151 2153.54 13 TOTAL W / GOV 164151 3618.61 13 TOTAL D / IND 0 802.50 45 TOTAL S / IND 283578 5699.63 45 _ TOTAL W / IND 254156 5763.83 43 TOTAL D / RE8 0 720.00 5 TOTAL S / RE8 30000 3044.40 5 TOTAL W / RE8 30000 824.40 5 TOTAL D / RE6 0 432.00 4 TOTAL S / RE6 18700 1826.64 4 TOTAL W / RE6 18700 533.70 4 J TOTAL M / NSF 0 25.00 1 TOTAL S / RE7 0 532.78 1 TOTAL W / DUM 61800 .00 0 TOTAL D / OUT 0 1277.40 71 TOTAL S / OUT 116400 5479.92 72 TOTAL D / CL4 0 72.00 1 TOTAL S / CL4 3400 304.44 1 TOTAL D / R12 0 1296.00 6 TOTAL S / R12 49700 5479.92 6 TOTAL W / R12 49700 1390.61 6 TOTAL D / R51 0 1836.00 2 TOTAL S / R51 51400 7763.24 2 TOTAL W / R51 51400 1557.58 2 TOTAL D / C10 0 180.00 1 TOTAL S / C10 1900 761.12 1 )ATE 123102 (UBU2) UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE SYS TIME 11:21 UTILITY BILLING REGISTER - - - UTILITY BILLS - - - REGISTER # kTE: 12/31/02 TUESDAY DECEMBER 31,2002 PAGE 1 GENERAL LEDGER DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY UPDATED TO MONTH/YEAR OF 12/02 ACCOUNT TITLE AMOUNT DEBIT CREDIT 10-1222-000 ACC. REC. - CUSTOMER 23906.19 23906.19 10-4410-000 GARBAGE SURCHARGE 23906.19 23906.19 W-1222-000 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - CUSTOMER 129172.88 129172.88 W-4101-200 WATER SALES 129172.88 129172.88 W-1222-000 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - CUSTOMER 55525.42 55525.42 10-4103-000 SEWER MAINTENANCE FEES .55525.42 55525.42 I0-1222-000 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - CUSTOMER 238793.49 238793.49 I0-4407-000 SANITARY FEES COLLECTED 238793.49 238793.49 iCTION AMOUNTS 1 DEBITS.... 447397.98 .L CREDITS... 447397.98 'S TO BE POSTED L DEBITS.... 447397.98 L CREDITS... 447397.98 -- (cioc>,- , .. ,�g4g`Uq \\,.6.„0, 0 .-, Y UNITED CITY of YORKVILLE County Seat of Kendall County H I 800 Game Farm Rd. L Yorkville, IL 60560 •1:. E 630-553-4350 4O56 `NOED 4N+I. /I �/", To: Larry Kot, Chairman ,f � d ` r�' From: Eric Dhuse, Public Works / _ // / Date: January 21, 2003 � � Re: Truck Orders ` Larry, As we have done in years past, I would like to ask permission to order our dump trucks as soon as possible even though we do not pay for, nor take possession of until next fiscal year. We need to order now to allow for the lag time it actually takes to manufacture and distribute this type of truck. When we did this last year, we ordered in February or March, and we did not receive the truck until October. We do not want to get caught without a truck that we need for winter. For the purposes of authorization, I would ask that a not to exceed $80,000 be used for budget. That will ensure us not only the truck, but will include the lights and snow plow as well. I would ask that this be placed on the Public Works agenda for January 27, 2003. If you have any questions, or comments, let me know. Cc: Art Prochaska, Mayor Tony Graff, Administrator Traci Pleckham, Finance Director UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE To: Tony Graff, City Administrator From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer '\` Subject: Burk's Drywall Easements Date: January 23, 2003 Attached find a proposed ordinance vacating a utility easement along the south side of Lot 1 in Block 2 of Fox Industrial Park, Unit 1. Also attached is a partial copy of the recorded plat showing the location of this easement, and a proposed watermain easement along the east side of the Burk's Drywall development. The easement will need to be vacated in order for Don Burks to develop his property according to the plans he has submitted. The proposed new easement, however, is only one easement among several that we will need. Other easements will be needed for existing and proposed utilities, ingress and egress, drainage, detention, and perimeter easements. I recommend that the existing easement be vacated, but that it be done concurrently with the creation of the other easements. Don needs to prepare a plat of easement showing describing all of the easements in one document. This item is scheduled for discussion at the Public Works Committee meeting of January 27, 2003. Cc: Dan Kramer, City Attorney Don Burks, Burks Drywall .„.., ,..•L,,-,"14.116141,F . . , ",-_,Ia. -'i=''. ''''''''4.''`?;:-.41!?,.•;I:ni".:;".i:Lr ,:: LI'...':. ,,, -::‘ ,,'. -",'', :"; • -.frj77t,...''''-',1,l';':'":. 1/:1:1'..1:'•--;,?'.'..,:..".:;ii,?;E I:'",.,:-, ' ::,.: ..: ,... '. ,. -.-..,':-.,,-,,:1:- '''..- ' .' .., 11pli,j,,.- ..,''''.'• '',-';'...''f"--'2.1.''''1,:1,';',.T.,17,-p'•-••••!r-',7',7;1,-,.,,,,,,,,--..- •74-...i....;:-•-", ,,,.. ,, -'-,--t' ....,--• ., t,,, . L",:-...,;--T•-,-; •.,,'•;:,,r:',-'''.:•'4--,-.--:4-',.i."%",--!--`.--' ."'-if--.2T:' t- f•-..1 ',,,".1!•-•:<,•' `,..:`,2''' • '•."2 ''- ' ;-:--'- - •••L'''''2,•; L.,--1.'" 1.,,wy, „INN-1:;:i.,,'7*;:;:'1'.,'-:37i•-'&074,::,04• ::',',:'VV--•';.,"-t''''''z'..•"'"--.4''''''••BLOCK•••,5' ;o2---7....- k-•',.=-.'".7.-:.,4'.: ... -- -,i ' ' .2'..` 1 .. ' ""11'';.-.,1,,"0.-.i .'•'... . -.,,,,,,-.7..•-."-*-- '4,',,. .'.-' ''.'4';'.Y.-ki.;,.:17.,7, ';'4,,,,'.).''''' ''-`'.‘.±.I.,2-'. -- •-•.•!An': 427 ' .c1",;...2i7-..,..,:.;..''-',.; .,v,,,,.la:•::: •:,-;;;r4r",.':.',2.--;-';'7';;'‘.7:;•11Z.::., ,i;.7f,.'....:•:;':;;;; '-7*''';:.",..fr,• -'••;•,::'''•;::::'...-'":',.••77;::::',..::it:. ,... :-. L. ', - „ . ---''''...7v 'F:'71' l''-‘-'''''.-i ,;'44: . : L: N''''''' '''' '.1'''': ''';'...:1';''.1?...i. ' .'..''. ',.''' . .,,, I LI 7 :'- : 1-;7.,'"':,.'. - ..:4 '..- .,.---- -,.'..!: ::.. , :l.:- r.'-...:----;•:' :: : - -7 - ''„,,--.., ..., • -t i ? 4,-,T_:,w :::::',ii,::::,, 17-:;;;;;:i'f.:,;441..-4---ii4-'4: , ,t,4_ -_L-,,;-,...,:,.1,1...2-....;.-J,!cg, ;=:,.••• -.,. ,:. ,,-• :,0:.: ,..--,:..-tt.-.. .-,•.!- co --- ' ':'.:.F•-'•`•.''.%'•,:i: ;:-.1''•:-,:--,'.:4j.'7-.,,',•-.- ...-,• .'... ..:..?• t i.•-'`';'•'._ --„ '•'•',..-.; .t-„ ,, ,,,.,,- .,::,....,,-.:,:,•-/.:: .::: .ev%,:~;.,-.': -.--; ,. ,,i_. .. 61,. ',.',.- .,--.,..'.!t- L': '':.:',..'..'"' .-:•• U L 'L•z4',k!'''':''.'.. . ' .2,6 Nr---- - . --- - ...,-',.- -.., --.:'•„‘--'•: ' ., ..--*-::-' 1.Z742.i.-.: -`'.: ,;---t ..--,-4-7:-4,:!..,,-1.,-4' !..g:;j:;'-!'::;,' - 014:--- ---_ -..t• ---k-- :--'-ii' -5-f-'-iti,'-':•-:','...,;:t;:'=:•„- •-•.•---,4.-.P..------7,:.'.',--, • . t. .';'...:',.z:' i.;.' '..*.. .-",..-.1/1, 0' .8•,. '..r: . .4 l'.,, :-.. . -,-,:.`.--r. :7-.Li;''A'..f..'f;'''''.''';-"SIN!I:A • *--.."-, ;,•::' - -- 4; ,. ,- %9 ':,''T„.''V.'-' ``,k ;''•, ::-:-':'-.1',,''-': • • ' - ,,,. . - ':-."•••'':',' . 'O.1 .'1`•• •:-'.,01 ' . ,f•ri- "!1,::', :'. ....r ' '.2.,' L. .' ,,;., 1.,7.,..'4,:';'z',!,',;.''':'',;:-.:',..e •-•i.:;,•.:Is..)--..---,---,-,.. , --, :-_----4,•;,:_--,.--,:„.--, ,:,:--..,.-.,------,i;t - ---:„...,-,-„t,„...- r4...-i•-„,,,,---,:„•.--,,-.--'-:.,--,-- , .--itt:',-. ---,- -• - - -,'-- %it,'-'.------_-...,....."I. ,''' .7 -i. L'.';- 1:',.:4•:::-:, *' i'4J,Illt, ,.:- ',,"•::‘;:e. ',2,:e.1„:4,_1-.' ''t,.:,_.,L .,`?.;;:-'' : ''''i''..1'''' : _ --T. s9'0.‘,•:'.:,...,-...1:-.:: f.:-...:,.-,, .--' .1..-'‘:,'•:-;---.9' ;,__ :;---51,-r .r. -- -.'' ''4 -G2:::1-!,• .; --.,:::;,t•".',-i.,4 .*:,,,-ir:/-,-(il ,--L-,. •li; t;hz;':1:•--:',.r-7.-1..---.:' 'L.. 7,'-''-"-':•'•_:-.-,'--.'7=.--'-„'---:, -.,--;‘,•,..--,-isit',I:i.,4--,,,,„,,,,•,..„.....:1''4 4-....,i.- =‘,. , ; , . .,,,..,i. --,:•',..t,„ ::-;:!;.4.,--,:-;."-* -I'. -: -„,,..-7:;',':,!,-.:..L-I--,„,'"'•-.-4-2:;:'-i.'.'''''';',Vit''''.r T':';i":.4: '. .16''':':.4::i'L:' ' ' '''';''..et '' .7117`;',":,:i':',:ii:Z:..::;!::'':'.'':,'*': ' ''..,':'''.;'-'7'.:?i,,;:.'''1:3'7: '.5, T. ,'f. " ' '' :e:;....'7'' .:,i;,-I'''.'.: ' T.::, S.:::'''...:: ''''''i f'. ;:'1''.-C'..:k 1 '','.7-,:i-4.1',.:A.- '.,:.7"'.---i',r-:'•''.;'-''''' _4..), 'iT,4-rYL,,;;,,:•`;', - , ..,,. 4,,i,tii.i.7-.,,,,T:.:--...-,',..-,:-.' :•• -4-_,...'..,:i. ,:',-..,'-,,;-.: tc.,,ir .. ..., , „:, .".,..tL..7.2,...',J,,,,..,.4'„:.:7.::,,,:.-7....,-...•ii ..• - '.... .)..- -:..., ..::, ;,..•;.,,.•-•:.: -';.:1'.,::•,•,:.., ',.,'-.'.1'1M-,ii, ,•r.:.:. ... '.....-;,7;,:-r.7,-,,:t,',.;" :14:H.S7r.:":•,:?'',.,i ,...';'•;,,...,:,,,;:.:,.,,_:.""it,7,-,... ":• . ' '''''_•; ..; ' :!.L'...: .,...--:',"-- - ..,, •'-.:.:'; ..-,-'. ";;;,"1;:,',.-'-•;,';, ,L7.,..'76 l'•:: ., :•::: ,1:::•-,:i.7, li -66 ''- If:"7-•.11.(.1.0,AY:'''41:,..-....',.---'. .---.-..:-',:'----;:f'-..'" :.,-': -..5:','•:;,."-.4-t-I.- c:I.'-:"...-.--;:,-'1?.r•L: .,:..:1;-;',.... .fet4';.'-;--]..=;"':'1.--7'7-;,::-":,2-(.' '....41*-7.-, •"`"-: .. . :::•-.:.•:12.40,0 ,::..,.1.,:; ,-.1,. ,;,"':::_\.•... --,-',s3:::::;,,,,c,--- ,::,;‘ le\q".*',I.,, ,-:t'*-'.-:,'---- ....,'.?,',....'11;:.--.'.4-::,'!','.- : '.‘‘,..''.,:-:.. ..,,,..-;.:. --)'::."-:.i.,:e.:..'iii 4•',; .::::1'...1'-'.7,-!;:';: i'..i7 L'::':_.t4:;2--i.:';...;-4.:--.': :',.',:,;.:-..'...,',','"11:7:-'': :- - '',.',,:.-:.- ''.---;- -,i004C.' ''.. ' .: .1'.-,.:1-;:-.;'*'. -i7,,:.'"i-!'"--:t., ';-•••.1.;=.'4'V'4,...-- •-ti,,- -3;'...-'''-!**'-i7'Y:::,:--'' '•:::".•.t' .,":", •-•L; t:',".--•,:•.".'--..f„r•':ii'i..2;..:';;;',',••• .•••• !.:;•-TY.-2••'2' -4tr-2:1.-7-,:;-:::::.V.::''-,%':- ..''';', ''-:-‘,'•.',:?'.it,.':-.;„':',.--.7-;:,12,--->4:.-', :,.i :•.;•,, •:.:7:1-:-i-i0 b ii,c4,:.. -'',:. -1...,,, :':.::,..."7,.,,;:.:.p...,...-::;,....;',,:,,,., --..,..',...-.„--:.,;,;,-::, ,z.:2,,:.:.: Ili.; ,::-,- ....%.:-4.,,k.7-:.,,,,,,;..,;..J.:;-?::::::,....-!..atitirtis.4_,,L1.0•,.: _ -...,,,-,....,.,,,..-,.::,.. 1 4i, ,:-.. „.;.,--......-z.lici'r.:,..;-.1,1; ..,"4,,:::: ;' ri'-'61-0-- k:,'', . 7'.7....--- '.:'..;.L,'::' ' .'L:'. ';':'' '''''''''',-,.‘';-- ': . - ''..". ., --.•C: ,-. 1,i-:,•-, ,..4, :: ,::-__4itZt„';;!...7„.7....t. .,i7:.';Iiri.'...:!1...'4,r,'',!.'":'''r::::7:::::::14,/•. TS'T':'='!.,',: .I..,,,,,• .,-:-'.i,•:::„.',,,;•::'..-,..:z...;;%l'-'„: II .r...'.;. 7At 7:: _'-',;:'-'-'-:, 7,7 '-',4•J;;''''..-• "'C.:::,.:?,• -t -:"-,";' -'--i.' ' ..,-1:.:` .-'.I''.• ',-,4''7.;...• ',-- ' ' . L,. ' Air „ „,„..„:::,..:t:_,,,,,. ,_,k,e:'-''•'>;:--.:4'.':-.-jl. , ..i.:.:,-.,- ..,.,-, ,?tiet.0:1.2!...f.t - '.-:''k.'".7..'."':7,*'.;:;;:.?:;-'4. -1.:(?)!..!-,--_-- -;-,-' lj--:. ,,,---„ir:.;,1%-:-- - 1,--i--4-!•-:-15-1-;: .' '--_-_--..--.,-:. --- 4,---0,-z,,p----v.,,t-,--.:-•,. ---,----..?--,,-.-,-,--, ,•,.. ,,ls .. , , :-.7,-,,..r.:',..'s.;:.',.--.,1, ''!-7'3?,i....!.1':;%,:::'•:,,:r::•::7 , ,, - 2:, ,;,4--,”:..,, f' ..7'-' ; ..f.','...::—.:-. o•-!!:,,.',.. ,..-,',,',..''.,.7:::,,-, .,.. ., ' : 7-..:'n...7,;,7:: . 4;:.',(44';',.:;,-. ,111:-.4' ‘;:t..1:.1.21‘...' '...:.',, .:1: s..-."--,1.,•-7,, ,: -• -----1,c.--,.7:::---2-•::'-'4?- I- -- -.''•--',.." --•-'i•-",'-::-:-,,„ -1-.-.; '-- .„-:."',; ----", -' _ ' ''.--" r'.::,;:: ,, ' ;,:i 4 t'71* '.. "..:'...i''c ''., ''''Zt6:71;::','''' :ar .!:,:''' .,;:. '; ''' •''''' . ' . ' e;id . .. : ' --Iti)'''..; 7--7 '",•:,,,R.-'-:10,7' .---, ,--,'..,--;i--,-,;---- ': ,-,-- -,..' •,'":,,,,--••-.-. --- t-r•.•.'-,-,-'- '..i,,,-....0.-,?..:.-- -.,---'-' '-';:.- ,-','''... -'''.' -. I .-'- ''. --;: -,-.....c:' ' -•'- - '-:' tiL`' ' *- • .i 52--.7 .- a.' :c.fi•-t-1,-.11 -- 'l',-_--t',.•-•x-3,: ---•••:-:,, .C',..-01:-.-:-----•: -Art- , --':1 -',-, ,. .,.,., r.,„,,,,, _,.- . ..,,,,cov,,,,.%.„.I : A,7,4,-1., .- ,,.k ...,,,,,.. •,..i.%5 .,,,,„1..,. : , . ..... ... ... •4 6 ...6,5 ...ipw. . ,;--. ,L-, : '-.'-.7* 1" 'i' '''' .-- '''''.".4,-7,...';z. '' r.,-.9,,-... . ,-: ---‘,---,-,-•---,- - 11 Si* - , ---2,,,-....:, 12::•--,.'''-''' , '9'Sto 7'1- -;:.•::"..;,-•-",.'''J.:. .';'''' V--.2.'-'3. ;Jo,i.i;'''-` :;-'--,_.:.'....,..'.:.--•": f.,:.-;:-:_-':'- 5! ''1:.-- •.-4: ' ' ',' : ' __, ;4_,,)" • .:H'-', ' . o. .,77..::t...i ; :.,..,,,,,,,:. ,-... % : . ',.,.'s,.L..,„1,:::-:::;,''-,.•::.-•,'.1R.' '-'-'.--.. ',:,.••,'.:3-L'.,:'..., ..:"!..-'f-iiStlr,•4!..'.'3. -,,-':''' -'. .-.1 ,--,„;,.,„,:„:,... '-.., .......-4,..,_,-m- E.-., - .-: --, _, -. ..,,,,,..„,..,,,,,,:„......,....,„- ;,.. ,f,.., .1.., •,:.,--:-.,,,,.:,„-.-,,,:,,,, --., ,. -...t.- 7---- --Vt%•`j- '"•:----:, • .---i-ILL:',41:4f".,:'-',--.7-..,' . .:;:i?-ft'A ,,',7'-'.P;•- ,f:,,,• .-L,-,,,,-.,.k..,,:--• ,,-..-":2;---..,..,-',!....V.,.-.:-",--...'.77 -5-*- -,-.- .:.:-- -- , ' . ..•;..!:,•-4,'2.' .': W--i,',*.,:1-t -',,.,'.ia::.-,:::: .:,-.-!'f.P.',c7.,-;.,:.,:.;-... 77.'„:., 7-i.,,-.-..„',,i,..-4' : -..--''.-,t.-,;:. -;:•_.;T.:---,'-;".:,...,';.•'..-:,..„' --.,.-:-_-44"- -•-;,, . . ,.., ,i*! '-i,-.;-,,'-'.'i;'-'.';;":-,Y,</-11,'",-. .:;',--:-i.;e,'',-,'..-:.71;t-i-.•2.:1;,,i7C-7.•:':*':77--'-'4°7:-:. .---, -._,!•:':'-..-i.''-'•; il.-5-.1--:;.r.4,4‘ ..:1--_,-.,,.T.,„ '.•''''..'1•1'..,'. ,::::::•::,,-",.:., ," , ,,-i,,,,,.-;,•,;r:;:'•,,',i..-•,,, , - :','-','-: .'.'.:.. ';'.".1-,,,e'',"_:.-;"_‘,:-.),,,--!;,.,;, --1,4,,y,,--t.: -P-,;;-..-,,A- ,:;.;'_.:.„-,i,,:--iiiis7" :15 --:4*--,...,[•!;..-i,:-.:.-'-:ii...:.:-.-...„.!, .104,,t.:::-...--.'.',-.,..-,. :-,,31-:iri:,.`,:;.,:;- ,-:-.::,,... - , . •.,..,,-,,,.....,--,.,,,.....,„!.,.,,,,'...-'-.,,,,.-,.7, ,,,::•.--'--J-.,Ti:',',-,-.7-,....-.-c-:.--,,.-_-.--- ,Lz,,,!...-,,.---•;-(•,',-. 7,-r,:!,,,i, 4-',.13 AV , . '.., 0.1..0,,,;'.';',:.,;'%-4tilr:': ! .' ' ' :.,..;=.,1,.': ,..:;,.,,..ii,..,-";i9'..ter.',' .,-..4"!".,'''. '.'•.,.. .'„,...:::..,-.,.,:.:. 2. _. :-.:,,,.,:,,,,::-.:,.._,,,?;;Z::_-:1?:-?L.,-, , 4 ti.;'-i'.4'.:rn-M Ikk - - , ,'--- ,f;-.,,.-_-.-7..,••4,.:.*_•-:!,-;;, ...,-,-.-i-4-Y---k'-:-:-.,„'...,,..,.- ---...„,--'.-,,, . .----- ,..,.,-"'!•;7.---70.-----_,-4,,,..-,::,:-,-,..4..-it'':'-•`;.*••'...-,,,.--•'it.",,,-.:4• 497?-:.1- 4-.4' -'"-- --'-'4,,,A .; 4.1t e_ -,•--,•:•-•-•`-l'ir.-- :1 --d.;--4)''a:c • 4,: '',''.',. ,:',1,',-,-..-''':-.'•:Fi''''':•"'"' .'''.-, ,'?)5A"frir'j'..t.'. i ,t: ;',..'..iV% ,14,I,/.;',---. .,,,? ::'".'',-"-: ..?"...1'. ..44,',tiA.-4.7,.'.4! E \ ,, ,-_- --9 -..4=- _,-,...7,-:7,-„,-.,_-..,...:4=.-:;-- •:',,S. ,...,,,,,,,,,,-.;.-:,.:-..,..,A4Nt0.,, t, 1.4, .,. ',_..,:-;:.--, --, '•'-'-:-,e1--,.:.,'...:,,,:.',',.,4,,,,,,-,:,-,.:4,.1.,--Y,-z--1,p;. ..::',.-i,,-..----i,,Lco ,:..!.,:r .,----,-,..'-:,,:-I':',.1,-,..•::',.it:::_,•,„.„, ,,„., e 1 „ , , -• ,• - ,::,.::::,;:,,:,,,..„,.,,, ,.,, . .„.....__ .,.,_,....,„:„• ._,.,,,,.._ ":„.„..„_,....•,,L. ,„•:,...,..,,-..„.r-:'V.4.::%. ''1-,,-' •'''Al. '',i...., -,.*-...1 -ii-•;---;•-_-_ .,,,-- -z.-,._,,:,. .--,...'.-....-:::,,,,, -,4-...f,---....,‘,I,i7,:„--,...i:,,,,,i--.,1--....-•„ -.:,,,-;-',-,:-..„--- -- -,-;;'-,,f-',;.",:,-4- *'-i-!.• .--- . v-r-,,,,,%,,,,--- -''-,4--•• - --,:-•-;.,,' .r.a1/4_-1-'• ,:--..,'--,,,,,----- A ':.1--i--i,..,---;,1-1_4--.-- -,-.'. ••'---‘ ----'--ity----1--c-I i _ . ,1,,,4,-; t---_-_---4--A-;--.-,..-,, - ,•....,,,,,,,:=4,-2,,,,,-,,.,-,.- -, -- 4.1,,•..:-- _,---',-,---.,--'„,-.7-'--.,-':-. ---,- ,---- ..,--.,,', „ -.4-.,:-..iis0;541'.?;,,--'(:,-.--.•-,,it,-44;-,:;;;;,•-;-:-'',-i,, ,..----,1 ,-,,.„4-r---".: 7` -..rf-.f.•-::--T-' T-'-:-'- .'''-'-•'•:::f:'.;•-:-,r-'-'•••••?. 141:51::'-'1•- -.71:ii.'-',Y''-"...-'''''..'"'",7--,: ..-,-.-•-•-•';-•.:'- . •- -..-..--: -'.?;•''•••••• .•-'-''';,--.'-,'_''``.•:':-4::::':',.. !!k'2-'-',,,'•:-.-;;'-'''''''!--,:l''-' ri. '''..... .....;- ,,.. 41,4-''t' ':.-?;',...,-,',-.;•.,,-;.:•--',,t--; ...4,,,; `:N...i..'7,--,'"- -.,t,::: ...,' ''' ', . 7_=4,77.!•, l. --,'" ';"-11 1::,' -;,,,,-,',".,`C‘j ,2.,,'''..::,'-,• 0t, -€-:„.,-- ,,. C .1Y,.'-',,,-,:ii.44..-7,,tilik,4-, -.--'-:-•-,-;•-,-,.--..'-',7,...„. -- •••,:,:,--::•;, -i-A-1*1.,,,-..r.-•4,,,:.i..--,,,,,:.-.-,,'....it 1-'..--,- -; : . „. ;---..• - -,..._;-#.••,iiV:Ttt',"1:.',•,-...4,-:!.• :?"'.7.- ---',. .- :.7 `,0,- '*i..',-,;-::',7. • :,:::.y:ctjtAt.le.i .:;7." '-'''- SIL',-,,V.,_, ..1:";2-::- ...,C:,:,-'1,,<?',.4-,- ;'•1::.'4, 1,•:!,:7:,-,.:...i:5-.;;:',;.-,, '- ,. - a' . ' ', '',' :-''.,...,''':N'.13.114.''',,,k -; ,-.:.,..•...Lti-'-'.. ..''4.!:--,7',. I,...'--INS -ii,--,:::-'...,:,''''''..: '-..; -'-..-.-• •;'..,.,itr9tort --..'N': 01--, - '..; '-:•4--4 '..,-4,:-0,,,..:4- t,' . 1 ., , ,i..,,- .'-..,:,-.,_,:-.. -4::-N::.4,:- .,,,: ; ,,,.:4- : ...,.,,.,.,:.:--i;--,...' -' -1',.:_=,. '.:1 ' . ',:-.::.:',: :-.- ,-,-..,-:i,:- '-f-n--..:;74.::.-40..-;&;''',,,;t0'77.it:!-, '''''''V''':•;;:34';: '-0''''•:.'' ;'''' '''' -:',-4:' ''''44 - ''''. ..,:'-', ''•;---„::''..- ?"'P4'-.'i'''4.t. .., ''.4';':: ''.-. . 14t1t-. 1;1 '7-',':- '.,- ,=,;-.. ..!...: 1-.,...-.!,- - !%- w45 -,:-., -L..,. ..-..-,-' -.. -1,:*...w .","1-; ,..- ,•?,-,'=1:j7.,v-.''' -7"-,,,,,, ,„,,—,,' ::. .'''. 1;jiiii : ,' *.;',.:',, ..;.F. L.:21'.• - ,'"';i.::'-' 4.. '''44. ti;','''',"• - ,-—:-.,, :L.T'r-''..;''''!;:' 4p 3 ''1.:-‘5-4'•1.1'."-2'''.:'X 46u •-:-—'-' '';""-:-- .4 k-. 17 - -7.----''' '---:, 147 '1•--;'.;.--74,7;..=;;.-7-•,'---,:i.:'-'-::.4-..:,.- - -il- - ',.--'-i-':!''i---',-'T•71;;;;- •-•.--..L .,-;;i'•*;...-t•t'' '-'i,4,•:,-'.:',-, ,''..-.7'.-.-.:'''.-'...' *:4'.: ',4.,':-.:'-',. -`4,-• ;%.. .„, ., : :':',`.:--,,,?;',;-1'1,','.:';'.."'` f.'-7-." 7.'' '.... :-.,in. 4-;, ,--"?'.._,'...1''. .•,-;.. -;,,t,-P-''J''‘-- ''-r.;''5-:'',4.,,,a''..:;;,_:-.,•-' ...47.?.V. • -;•,--,---."-;.::".:':' -,'"'-;,,--:'-i'.--'1- 11tVIA.,...4•-, ,`-:-.,, ' --,•!..-----.y:v.- „,,,,---,•,--,,:-L-.,.;1.:...!,41,....-4,„..,-,:-.1-12-..,?-,,,--r, -,,..,i.•.,-., ..,..4.•;•,....„,,-., ,2-71,,?...2 s,:. , ..,7,...-,,`.1.... .„,.,1,- ,;,*,<:',.;:e!..V.."ij,!..7.,,,,,,,,..‘.;:fit-,:,:2,;•,".41ti:-,,T!Z 2,!...r.,"ii).,,It.:,..:t!..,';•::,....;•.'2.-..,......"-%2-;V _•... ...-.'i :-:.::•:.c):-.'-‘7---..--1-." "•i-..:,-.7-' r!,•-:1-4,';' • ••,.•--; -71 :.--'-'•-',-,'',''.'•.. 2_,:-.•• •'•''.: --'-`,t4',';',','t 7.t.':''i It,.,•:-.•'-'%. t-r"-.';.,',.:`:-'_,;t•.-'-'',-.,:•.*';.--tA.,,,g.:.,..K1•7,,,..._.f7t. -,:'..-'•t-':,,-2,'•---'-,:''. :. '--. :,..-t•'""...--'"''4'f'-:.- r"-"-,- T"-,•I'Llk * - - -. -- -:--, _ -•,- • - . . :,•,, ','•4-`'•'''. , : ' ''....,L;' t,-,f,-'• • 0' .. ' '.1 . -,, ::•,,,. 'r',..-.t..',;y::::,:.:',.1::).?:471;:::-.7.,,,-!,::?..,..--....Z...-•,..5..il,-,i'!-;,....:4... ...,•-',...:-•;,::-.k:47...r. :,',•-.....,`•:-',...,›-14:. f.t.•.-.7.7 ,'..:--.z...,0,4,,.--;•,:7,,,. .•-:,,,..--'.:.,,,•,,i.a-,...- . :. .._,,,_.i.„.,::::,,,,,:,,./..j.,,...,-,-..:.,,,..,,,,..4....,4. .t.,,,f-u•.;:,..., '.'yr),-.:,, ,1: .;:-.,i.t...,,,,,,•,..•„,:,,,,,,,,,cA_:,„,,_?4,,,,,.:::•,., ,....-..'-3,:;-::::,c,,:"_11.,,'-'. ..::.t.il,-;4::'Z' 7:.`-';;',4,i-.:;-'•;::::,-,,-,:•.::,- -...:-,......i' ',;.-:1-K-,..-:.-'-',;-.2.:,,':'''':'•-..--':::.::•,..:,-_-;&-L'':,fr..'•.:,-rt# 2.-:'-;-.' ,.?.;;-' : ---',L1.,-..;:•--r - - „ .,,i. et fl.e. '!-.. ::•.-„:4-'::-.--..);".', :r.--'--;-..A. *,,.C--i-4;"'"7,"114': '''-'::;;:'•-•'',-',.,:.'..,.' ";‘';.$.7-',...C,""!•1--::::;'„,,,,,,..V. ,1t,.- _:•.; rt.,••-- r4- „.,.., • 11..,..;'..:liZ7k2.---..,'-':.1 j'.:'•..--„ - '''-'?. .-.-.--,i-,'-4;:,-',7,:-hi:7,1:i-i-.:---.7,--7 .-,:,-:::,•-.."', . -,---,, '-'- ;t:;•'",-1"-' .'•'.'„,----5--'-';' ,''.i- -;-,,-;-- :. q' 2-1,4;-,--r::,--'.---.r.',..,::'''I''.," ;---! ,',- ";'-',\;.*L7,i;414d.;--,.. ",..--i'--.7'''q-,',."..--.:!..;It• :-T.- --,-. _,'-''••?-t,',.1'..t''.:i-',ItlY.'-'''',W7tili,.-',-3.- ..1%._Ir7. ',,':„:-1---*''''•. ,-,.,''..'''',:!: ,, :It, .-., .,:;4_,'-' 'a-'' -:,, - -;. 1`.1.,i'- -.!---::-,:-,;:-:` -- ',.';'-".!-!:.•-:-'*'-''',-7:-t7 ,-.4:-.,:‘,;-ii-:-.:;.: '',. 1,,,,,..-4i•i,-,...4',U4..i.;-",;,--,,:c.1,.',• ;--„-:-,!•,,4•- •.,-.‘:-•,-i-'1-,:.-4-.--4.-'8,eilt ::•-::•;,•._;_ f:';-.1. -: - ::.-,.',. ..;,-:""-,,','::',.'.. ,-,_',..;.,...•,._;;;-::::. ,-i:4:.--,:,:.,, . ...1-.2..:::;-,.: ,:(:','„,-.7., ,-..'',- - -.'_., :..-.4-;;. ••---,-..i:?,.$4:-..,:eL', 77.:, •-.:, ,:4:::::-V.I. 1.--, '._.;.,,,,,..,:,,.,,,,,',i,-. ..., .;:i.:-...i.--'- '--....-, '..,...i. '...:;. ,-,-e-...,:,:. '....:;'- -. ....'':..,':;:-..,-f....55.,,,..i.T,-; ""- :-'1.'q.:4L•;!'"1.5','.S.'." '•' -,"I‘,; :."'?";'i-"''^. '::•'-''',': '.' --'•'''' ''' ',;-:'' '' '''-'; ''.i'it'..' •”''' '.•.':: :::'..":-L!‘ ' '•"'-..,--ii_i:;t-''.F 1.''r•`. '-•' 1 ''l Vt.:,,,,,"'''' j; 1,- -C.','',-:.40". 1=c';'S'--',c-:;',:/.4.L.;,;.'?: ::,,,,',,,,1:':-.,.,.'.'::.,,'"-:,.'''='•-,1- .•- 1,...- .,--_'.‘2P--...4,2,-,:. •. , • --c, - -.:- L':: ''';*•'•'-,•- • -v..,.i' -,--/-';f4.1.•;!--••• :::-'"-.:''--.,7 z,.- - ...,.-', ->:',...'7-s.•..-: -:::::e.-.:,...)'',-.-,•-k','"','-:' '4',:'7'-4,7--';.;:"•••:,::.•:!".,•:"L'f,4' ,'.7f.', 'ji,'-44;,..;,,'":147 , '.'''.4,---.-;'•121'':-'.i-',:":1'4 ."•.: . t; ' --' ''''.--,;,-'•"4:,-' -. 1' ', .' ,'•,. '. , ‘,..4 !,,;:i,,:.!..„,.1,2, 1;,,•.; ',,,,:•-•--','._,• ;, .: ';•-,-;-,-7-".: "--..=;;1,..?.'4'..-''•',':,t4t: ' . '''' ',,,‘ .'-•'L '•..--,-.•--le' : .-.4,-.'-• r.44;'''.',,:i..4 ';•',-.;,...:,,'.-..,•,4 0 i i,•.'.1.;. •'•*/..,-,.'' ' - . •• ,,, 42 .1r, ,,,:k•-•:,'1•:',,,t•47 .. -: '1;`,,.?;';:.!..' ' :'.";,.:, ,e.,`, -:;:, ',' ;-;,Z''''-,',':, -;; ;•.•s '-•.:-.- ....; '',•, ' ......•72.-•.'"' '. •'''' .'",..-'',,e.i`::.-:.', ''• a'.7-; 4::.'.. ..,-,;;..A.,,,,,,,, .:'..,;,..-,'::::-;:.,,1::..,..:-.:z„,:A .r..:. ---:_- .. ....,, 4:''• - '' '` : ' .. :,..-,i7C,:,•"'f:'-' ''' ' "t-c•'t:.14c-1'.8e.:4`1'711n4.'-'12'1";-:'-•.,-...''--31i•-;'1'. .:•'-'•'''..'1.-?, ',-i',"'•:-,-"::.!' '-''.(::..2•'"'.', .;;:.% ''''.:'; -..'•.-.',2....:;'...‘ ' ''''3-'4:14'1••:14',Aq.'':,...!-'-':','.,,-;Iii•reitlilri3O-.?',,-,'i...''.;: ;.'',..: ;.i.--4.-' .',:,'7.:-.t. ;'..":• -•;-.--'--2 .... `,-.'•••':''.' ;,:.--1:-.-Ar,',- ,,, , •...,...'-,„ ...:,-:,..-:-.!',...-':::::::- . -,•,- - ..', ,:',.,,„ .,,,,,.-5;‘,1vv..15,v,„.at-'..,,,;':4:---',,-;xi:.,,A-:- .t-'•,'....,,..::. 7.,-;,;.,-. -,-. ,-...',-,•`-,:•;.,,,-,4 . ,,A,L. ,i, %...,,,,.1,4.-'5.-..2.:?3,,..g.,.:4T-i,:;,,,:.,..4,:-..'.ii-. ,, ,',,x,,' i-d..4';',-'',' '.., ,. . Lik.uf.'''',V,„': .,.-,,-,..-4.k.,-';:;.-: :.L. • .:-: - .,...,, .::-, .','!-.,- lit ,--::-.,::_,i,. -.,Y. ;: ..,.:,?.',:.--,-:--;;:,,IT.::,-,..1-;;,Y- -.:;.,...,,-...•:,,-.,-,--, ,.:-.".'.1F.',,'„';°• ?,-:,P.-1.'77'.:"..k.:;., ,t,, ,,,, .::I!'e,47."!•,*i•Af;$%:4,-;:.,,.!:,..4 ',q=,:i-. •''S''',;,' ''•••4;'','-''''-:::'.F.'::,f,4.-4.-....,'.':.,.,:,r1.11,!4,n'. ni::::-.',...7'.',:''.:•,•;•:iI,:..C. '•'' ._:_ ..•,. ' • ,_;tii •1.::'',•.?C.-“'i•;"l';.-..,1:: Li..,..t...'..;,,,- ---; ... 1.,,,,, -.1.;‘..„ y..,:m*LrYst:.,:f; .,'....!....,......,4,i5ff,14--;,,i7:21,t1,.!,-,-;,,4i,ii•2:v.,,-.:::-..:..,: ;:,i-;,-.4-,:.-:-,.::::f,-...:.'. .2,..r.,.-,Lii,i'Ogg'1,,f,,'.-•:.- .-'''''.''''''''''''''' ' :---14z14":'•'-:'•••;-.-'• .'s n .',....k:f.'-' 37.P.407,;:;';'.-':,' s .f :'; `e.:::.:?:•:.°4- 6,'.7ihi:"-41:1;.:%.4 ;,Kt•:.t.71',t.,..qi.'tri:74'4 , :.; 7,7:. ''','----' .:eilli'ir.'':1 '.7'Ar:7'''''''.:. .,,'''''t:':•42..4 .,f,..•12.I.,;...,'t';-Itl.i.,iik.`etsti'',V, '' '.1.••••.:::?..illeh...4•X',..;:,:'d'ir.J4-?..f;74;'''''..,I.'i';':':"--4;44,1•• -pkt-rg' -.,', ...:.',‘......::'•.':Lf:.',7,‘441'.. .:4'S•,',.:-L-'41C.'':.-'ir:..ri.•:.V,;c10'"*A1. -11''...,'''..;',4''.i *:?;.,,,::',,i,.J.,t', ;•-=i,'t.," "- .4::`;'-.'2,1',T.t.:*21 .'.',';---. ''',401':•':-1...-4,.-",.::,:";::,;!:;,i.lfli,*;i,,rilk:ig.,,..-$••••,,t.:;.4...:f..'t?!..,t. , *:-..--tr,,,;. .N'•.4 !PA 4:,.7,:n '''',4: 117'-liC*'' ' 01/23/2003 08: 17 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J KRAMER lI002/010 LAW OFFICES OF gtritedi elaa/0262 1107A SOUTH BRIDGE STREET DANIEL J.KRAMER YOKNLLE,ILLINOIS 60560 JILL K.KONEN (830)5539500 KELLY A.KRAMER FAX:(630)553.5764 January 22, 2003 Tony Graff, City Administrator Joe Wywrot, City Engineer United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Rd. Yorkville, IL 60560 Dear Tony &Joe: Please put the enclosed Ordinance Vacating the 10 foot Utility Easement located in Lot 1 in Block 2 in Fox Industrial Park Unit 1 in the United City of Yorkville on the Public Works agenda for Monday, January 27, 2003. If you could likewise process it through COW and City Council it would be greatly appreciated. My understanding is that the existing easement that runs east and west across Lot 1 in the Oakwood Building's parcel in Fox Industrial Park is to be vacated and in turn Oakwood Building is dedicating to the United City of Yorkville at no cost, a ten (10) foot water utility easement running parallel with the east property line of the subject property, a copy likewise of which is enclosed herein, Thank you and should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Vcry truly yours, Daniel J. Kramer Attorney at Law DJK/lgc Encl. 01/23/2003 06 17 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J KRAMER 0 003/010 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) ss COUNTY OF KENDALL ) ORDINANCE NO.2003- ORDINANCE VACATING THE 10 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED IN LOT 1 IN BLOCK 2 IN FOX INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT 1 IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WHEREAS,the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE received a Petition to Vacate the 10 Foot Wide Utility Easement located across lot 1 in block 2 in Fox Industrial Park Unit 1,within the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE; and WHEREAS, the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, through its Mayor and City Council have held a Public Hearing pursuant to 65 1LCS 5/1 1-91-1 (2002)permitting all public input and comment in regard to said Petition to Vacate said utility easement in the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the UNITED CITY OF YORKVIT-LE to vacate the entire 10 foot wide utility easement located across lot 1 in block 2 in the Fox Industrial Park Unit 1, within the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE to OAKWOOD BUILDING AND LAND CORP, an Illinois Corporation, who is the Owner of Record of said lot 1 in block 2 in Fox Industrial Park Unit 1; and -1- 01/23/2003 06 17 FAX 830 553 5764 DANIEL J KRAMER Z 004/010 WHEREAS, it is the intent of the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE to vacate the entire 10 foot wide utility easement located across lot 1 in block 2 in the Fox Industrial Park Unit 1, within the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE to the Owner of Record of said lot; and WHEREAS, the City finds that no utilities of any kind are located within the 10 foot utility easement, nor are any utilities planned for said easement in the future; and WHEREAS,the City finds that said property does not have substantial value that would result in compensation to the City if said utility easement were to be sold; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE has determined it to be in the public interest to vacate said utility easement to relieve the City of any burden of installation and maintenance of said utility easement; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE by a positive vote of at least three fourths of its elected members of the City Council hereby agree to vacate the entire 10 foot wide utility easement located across lot 1 in block 2 in the Fox Industrial Park Unit 1,within the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE to OAKWOOD BUILDING AND LAND CORP., an Illinois Corporation; and The City Council of the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE further finds that said utility easement vacation is in the Public interest based upon the findings herein above made, and that no damage, monetary or otherwise shall exist to the residents of the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE by reason of vacation of said street right of way. -2- 01/23/2003 08 17 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J KRAMER 005/010 MIKE ANDERSON JOSEPH BESCO VALERIE BURR PAUL JAMES LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS RICHARD STICKA APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois, this day of , A.D. 20 MAYOR PASSED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County, Illinois this day of ,A.D. 20 Attest: CITY CLERK Prepared by and Return to: Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer 1107A S. Bridge St. Yorkville, IL 60560 (630) 553-9500 01/23/2003 00 17 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J. KRAMER 12006/010 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )ss Revised January 22,2003 COUNTY OF KENDALL ) GRANT OF PERMANENT WATER MAIN EASEMENT AGREEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT the Grantors: OAKWOOD BUILDING AND LAND CORP., an Illinois Corporation, and NARVICK BROS.LUMBER CO.,an Illinois Corporation,in consideration of the sum of Ten and 00/100(Dollars)($10.00)and other good and valuable consideration,the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged do hereby grant,bargain, sell and convey to the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,a Municipal Corporation, its successors, and assigns, hereinafter referred to as Grantee, in consideration of the covenants to be kept and performed by the Grantee herein, a permanent easement to maintain, and operate a permanent water main underground and further the right of access to said area for the maintenance and repair of said water main easement as well as all appurtenances thereto such as fire hydrants, valve shut-offs, and similar apparatus if it is actually installed in, upon, and across the tract of land described as follows and shown on the attached plat, to-wit; Over the easterly ten(10)feet of the following described property: PARCEL 1: LOT 1 I BLOCK 2 IN FOX INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT 1,IN THE CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF THE EAST'/OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5,TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH,RANGE 7, LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1(4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4,655.52 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE TANGENT OF ILLINOIS STATE ROUTE NO. 47, EXTENDED FROM THE SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 01 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE TANGENT AND SAID CENTER LINE, 475.21 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST 1812.98 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 9 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST 1890.09 FEET TO A LINE DRAWN NORTH 81 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF"CROOKED CREEK WOODS"AS PER THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 14 OF PLATS AT PAGES 4 AND 5 AS -1- 1 01/23/2003 08 17 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J. KRAMER a007/010 DOCUMENT 71-4055 IN THE R.O. OF KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS;THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID LINE 528.93 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 907.05 FEET SOUTH 81 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST OF THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY ROUTE NO, 47, SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY BEING 40 FEET NORMALLY DISTANT EASTERLY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF SAID HIGHWAY;THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREE 44 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WET PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE 390 FEET;THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST 947.65 FEET OF THE CENTER LINE OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY RTE.NO,47;THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREE 44 MINUTES 07 SECONDS<WALONG SAID CENTER LINE 1268.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;(EXCEPT FOX INDUSTRIAL PARK,UNITS 1 AND 5),IN THE CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, AND,(EXCEPT THAT PART OF OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, SECTION 5,TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH,RANGE 7,EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT AN IRON PIPE LOCATED ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5 WHICH IS 655.52 FEET SOUTH 07 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 36 SECONDS WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5 ON A BEARING REFERECED TO GRID NORTH OF THE ILLINOIS STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM,EAST ZONE,SAID IRON PIPE IN THE TANGENT CENTER LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 EXTENDED FROM THE SOUTH;THENCE SOUTH 3 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 36 SECONDS EAST 1,048.91 FEET ON SAID EXTENDED TANGENT AND CENTERLINE TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF A TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT 7401463 IN THE RECORDER'S OFFICE OF SAID COUNTY AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 3 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 36 SECONDS EAST 695.19 FEET ON SAID CENTER LINE TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT; THENCE SOUTH 84 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 37 SECONDS EAST 60.90 FEET ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT;THENCE NORTH 3 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 36 SECONDS WEST 705.63 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT; THENCE SOUTH 86 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 24 SECONDS WEST 60.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING) Said grant of easement is made under the additional following terms and conditions: The Grantors hereby grant the right of ingress and egress to said permanent water main easement to Grantee. The Grantee herein shall and hereby agrees to: 1. Restore the surface of said permanent and construction casement to the condition thereof existing at the time of entry upon same, and shall leave the surface of such easement level and free of all debris,rocks in excess of two inches (2"), and gravel, and providing a covering of a minimum of six inches (6") of clean, black, fertile top soil and replanting of grass whenever disturbed. 2. Replace all lot lines and property line stakes,fencing,and signage moved or disrupted in the course of performing working connection with the purpose of which the easements herein is granted. 3. The Grantee warrants and agrees to keep the legal descriptions conveyed for said easements free and clear of any and all construction lien claims. 4. Grantee shall indemnify and hold Grantors and its mortgagees, its successors,and its assigns, harmless and defend them, and each of them, from and against any and all claims, actions, -2- 01/23/2003 08 16 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J KRAMER fl 008/010 damages,liability,losses,expenses and liens,including(but not limited to)reasonable attorneys and other professional fees, arising out of any occurrence causing injury or damage to any person(s)or property, whomsoever and wheresoever, and resulting from or caused by any acts or admissions of grantees,their employees,agents,licensees,contractors,successors and assigns in exercising any of the rights and privileges granted herein. 5. Following completion of construction of facilities described herein, or any other excavation work to be performed hereunder in connection with the exercise of the rights and privileges granted hereby,Grantee, shall cause all excavated spoil material to be spread evenly over the area subject to the easement and temporary construction easement and to reasonably level the surface on tap of the easement and temporary construction easement leaving a clean black dirt surface of at least eight(8")inches. Grantee shall remove any trees or other debris cleared as a result of construction. In the event the Grantor has sustained any property damages as a result of Grantee's construction activities, Grantee shall reimburse Grantors any expenses or damages incurred. 6. Said easement shall be treated as a covenant running with the land. 7. Said easement shall be binding upon the successors,heirs,and assigns of each party hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors have hereunto set their hands and seals this day of , 2003. -3- 01/23/2003 08 18 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J. KRAMER Z009/010 GRANTOR; OAKWOOD BUILDING AND LAND CORP., an Illinois Corporation By: Attest: STATE OF ILLINOIS ) COUNTY OF KENDALL ) being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and states that they are the Grantor who signed the foregoing Agreement;that it understands the contents thereof,and the same are true and correct, Subscribed and sworn to before me, , A.D. 20 NOTARY PUBLIC -4- 01/23/2003 08 18 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J. KRAMER 0010/010 GRANTOR: NARVICK BROS, LUMBER CO., an Illinois Corporation By: Attest: STATE OF ILLINOIS ) COUNTY OF KENDALL ) being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and states that they are the Grantor who signed the foregoing Agreement;that it understands the contents thereof, and the same are true and correct. Subscribed and sworn to before me, , A.D. 20 NOTARY PUBLIC Prepared by and return to: Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer 1107A S. Bridge Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560 630.553.9500 -5- UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE To: Tony Graff, City Administrator From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Subject: Water System Improvements--Revised Engineering Agreement Date: January 22, 2003 Attached find one copy of the proposed new engineering agreement with Engineering Enterprises, Inc. for the several water improvement projects we will need to construct in the next few years. The revised agreement supercedes, rather than amends, the previous • The treatment process was changed from Lime Softening back to Cation Exchange. • Changes to the distribution watermain routes due to the change in treatment plant location. • Additional work is needed in the new south pressure zones. • Construction of a new well to keep up with growth. The original process for water treatment was Cation Exchange, but was changed to Lime Softening due to concerns voiced by Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District. We have had ongoing discussions with YBSD since then, and they have now agreed to accept the waste from the Cation Exchange process. The Lime Softening plant would have been located on Route 34 east of Tuma Road. The main Cation Exchange plant will be located at the Public Works yard on Tower Lane. The change in location requires different routes and sizes of raw watermains to transport water to the plant, and finished watermains to re-distribute the treated water back to the system. The City Council recently entered into agreements with the developers of The Highlands and Windett Ridge subdivisions regarding water supply. Those agreements obligate the city to construct a water tower and pressure boosting/reducing stations south of Route 71. The attached bar chart shows our ability to meet average day and maximum day demands based on past records, and also projects future growth. A widely accepted standard is to be able to keep up with demands with the largest well out of service. The chart indicates that for maximum day demands we have failed to meet this standard since 1995, and that even with both wells operating we will not be able to keep up with the demand in 2005. The chart also shows that we will be unable to keep pace with average day demands this year if a well went out of service. The new wells proposed for the Grande Reserve development will not be in service for at least a few years, and even then will only be able to serve that development. Proposed Well No. 6 at the new north water will help alleviate the problem in the north pressure zone, but transferring significant amounts of water from there to the new south zone will not be practical. Since it is good design practice to have at least one source of supply in each zone, EEI and I recommend that a well be drilled in the new south pressure zone as soon as possible. The cost of the current and proposed projects are summarized as follows: Item/Task Current Proposed Construction: $16,432,410 $14,803,184 Legal/Loan Admin./Testing: $ 100,000 $ 145,000 Total Construction& Additional Services: $16,532,410 $14,948,184 Design Engineering: $ 1,157,254 $ 1,027,840 Construction Administration: $ 226,870 $ 247,270 Resident Engineering: $ 587,524 $ 461,404 Total Engineering: $ 1,971,648 $ 1,736,514 Total Project Cost: $18,504,058 $16,684,698 While we realized a significant reduction in cost in the radium compliance work by switching back to Cation Exchange, we added work for the south pressure zones and Well No. 7. The estimated engineering cost for the current project is 12.00% of the construction cost. The estimated engineering cost for the proposed project is 11.73% of the construction cost. Please place this item on the Public Works Committee agenda of January 27, 2003 for consideration. MAXIMUM DAY WATER USE United City of Yorkville, Kendall Co., IL 3.50 3.00 Current Well Capacity 2.502Q,rfttJ ti O 1.50 f 44 E ' s f, a 1 'R .,, rCurrent Well Capacity With ' z.:.2 ,' w ; ,..;;'4,,,.....;; ,. Largest Well Out of Service 0.50 i - _ ' ` -- 0.00 1995 ' 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Year AVERAGE DAY WATER USE United City of Yorkville, Kendall Co., IL 3.50 3.00 Current Well Capacity 2.50 0 o2 0) 2.00 m O• 1.50 d co 2 Q Current Well Capacity With 1.00 4.11nrik.........IMPO.F.M.11..,.,... -....,.......� Largest Well Out of Service ::: . i' Ii_i 1 I ; ' ! I I I i i I I I Ii I ! I I I I' 'i i I i I' . ' ' i i . I I 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Year ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. SUGAR GROVE, IL 1/21/03 UPDATED COST ESTIMATE WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Estimated Contract Construction Number Project Cost A.1 Elevated Water Storage Tank $1,391,655 A.2 Rt. 47 Finished W.M. & BP/PRV Station $1,085,243 Subtotal Contract A Construction Costs $2,476,898 Engineering (Contract A) $198,154 Subtotal Contract A Improvements $2,675,052 B.1 Wells No. 3 and 4 Treatment Facility $1,644,500 B.2 State Street Finished Water Main $491,745 B.3 Wells No. 3 and 4 Raw W.M. & King St. Finished W.M. $1,526,485 B.4 Well No. 6 $544,500 B.5 Well No. 6 Well House and Treatment Facility $1,705,000 B.6 Well No. 6 W.H. and T.F. Lift Station and Forcemain $532,400 Subtotal Contract B Construction Costs $6,444,630 Engineering (Contract B) $821,650 Legal Surveying, Grant and Loan Admin., Soils Testing, and Well Siting $114,027 Subtotal Contract B Improvements $7,380,307 C.1 South Water Storage Tank $1,500,000 C.2 Mill and Van Emmon Street Finished Water Main $687,450 C.3 Liberty Street Finished Water Main $478,406 C.4 South BP/PRV Station $444,650 C.5 South PRV Station $109,150 C.6 Well No. 7 $544,500 C.7 Well No. 7 Well House and Treatment Facility $1,705,000 Subtotal Contract C Construction Costs $5,469,156 Engineering (Contract C) $634,104 Legal Surveying, Grant and Loan Admin. and Soils Testing $30,973 Subtotal Contract C Improvements $6,134,233 D.1 SCADA System Integration $412,500 Subtotal Contract D Construction Costs $412,500 Engineering (Contract D) $82,606 Subtotal Contract D Improvements $495,106 TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS $16,684,698 G:\PUBLIC\Yorkville\2001\YO0101 Water Works Projects Proposal\Eng\Icost estimate.xls]Rev.Estimate 1-21-03 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. SUGAR GROVE, IL UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 AMENDED 1/21/03 AMENDED AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES This Agreement, made this day of , 20 , by and between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, hereafter referred to as the OWNER, and Engineering Enterprises, Inc., Sugar Grove, Illinois hereinafter referred to as the ENGINEER amends and supercedes all previous contracts: The OWNER intends to construct Water Works System Improvements in Kendall County, State of Illinois and for which the ENGINEER agrees to perform the various professional engineering services for the design and construction of said improvements. The OWNER intends to construct the improvements as follows: construct the 1,000,000 Gallon North Elevated Water Storage Tank (E.W.S.T.); install approximately 9,600 LF of 16-inch water main along Route 47, including the North Central Booster Pumping/Pressure Reducing Valve (BP/PRV) station to connect the new E.W.S.T. into the existing Water Works System; construct the Wells No. 3 and 4 Cation Exchange Treatment Facility; install approximately 2,850 LF of finished water main (preliminarily sized at 16-inch) along State Street; install approximately 3,740 LF of raw water main (preliminarily sized at 12-inch) to connect Wells No. 3 and 4 to the Wells No. 3 and 4 Treatment Facility and approximately 3,090 LF of finished water main (preliminarily sized at 16-inch) along King Street; construct Water Well No. 6 (deep sandstone); construct the Well No. 6 Well House and Treatment Facility; construct the Well No. 6 Well House and Treatment Facility Lift Station and Force Main (approximately 12,000 LF); construct the South Water Storage Tank; install approximately 2,680 LF of finished water main (preliminarily sized at 16-inch) along Mill and approximately 1,370 LF of finished water main (preliminarily sized at 12-inch) along Van Emmon Street; install approximately 2,800 LF of finished water main (preliminarily sized at 16-inch) along Liberty Street; install the South BP/PRV station; install the South PRV station; construct Water Well No. 7 (deep sandstone); construct the Well No. 7 Well House and Treatment Facility; install a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system throughout the Water Works System; and continue the Shallow Well Siting Program. WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises between the parties hereto, it is hereby agreed: SECTION A - PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES The ENGINEER shall furnish professional design engineering services as follows: 1. The ENGINEER will attend conferences with the OWNER, or other interested parties as may be reasonably necessary. 1 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 (Section A—Continued) 2. The ENGINEER will perform the necessary design surveys, accomplish the detailed design of the project, prepare construction drawings, specifications and contract documents, and prepare a final cost estimate based on final design for the entire system. It is also understood that if subsurface explorations (such as borings, soil tests, rock soundings and the like) are required, the ENGINEER will furnish coordination of said explorations without additional charge, but the costs incident to such explorations shall be paid for by the OWNER as set out in Section D hereof. 3. The contract documents furnished by the ENGINEER under Section A-2 shall utilize IEPA endorsed construction contract documents, including Supplemental General Conditions, Contract Change Orders, and partial payment estimates. 4. Prior to the advertisement for bids, the ENGINEER will provide for each construction contract, not to exceed 10 copies of detailed drawings, specifications, and contract documents for use by the OWNER, appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies from whom approval of the project must be obtained. The cost of such drawings, specifications, and contract documents shall be included in the basic compensation paid to the ENGINEER. 5. The ENGINEER will furnish additional copies of the drawings, specifications and contract documents as required by prospective bidders, material suppliers, and other interested parties, but may charge them for the reasonable cost of such copies. Upon award of each contract, the ENGINEER will furnish to the OWNER five sets of the drawings, specifications and contract documents for execution. The cost of these sets shall be included in the basic compensation paid to the ENGINEER. Original documents, survey notes, tracings, and the like, except those furnished to the ENGINEER by the OWNER, are and shall remain the property of the ENGINEER. 6. The drawings prepared by the ENGINEER under the provisions of Section A-2 above shall be in sufficient detail to permit the actual location of the proposed improvements on the ground. The ENGINEER shall prepare and furnish to the OWNER without any additional compensation, three copies of map(s) showing the general location of needed construction easements and permanent easements and the land to be acquired. Property surveys, property plats, property descriptions, abstracting and negotiations for land rights shall be accomplished by the OWNER, unless the OWNER requests, and the ENGINEER agrees to provide those services. In the event the ENGINEER is requested to provide such services, the ENGINEER shall be additionally compensated as set out in Section D hereof. 2 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 1/21/03 (Section A—Continued) 7. The ENGINEER will attend the bid opening and tabulate the bid proposal, make an analysis of the bids, and make recommendations for awarding contracts for construction. 8. The ENGINEER further agrees to obtain and maintain, at the ENGINEER's expense, such insurance as will protect the ENGINEER from claims under the Workman's Compensation Act and such comprehensive general liability insurance as will protect the OWNER and the ENGINEER from all claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance by the ENGINEER or by the ENGINEER's employees of the ENGINEER's functions and services required under this Agreement. 9. The ENGINEER will complete the final plans, specifications and contract documents and submit for approval of the OWNER, and all State regulatory agencies to meet the project schedule(s) as summarized in Attachment A: "Schedule-Water Works System Improvements" dated January 21, 2003 . If the above is not accomplished within the time period specified, this Agreement may be terminated by the OWNER. The time for completion may be extended by the OWNER for a reasonable time if completion is delayed due to unforeseeable cases beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the ENGINEER. SECTION B -PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING SERVICES The ENGINEER shall furnish professional construction engineering services as follows: 1. The ENGINEER will review, for conformance with the design concept, shop and working drawings required by the construction Contract Documents and indicate on the drawings the action taken. Such action shall be taken with reasonable promptness. 2. The ENGINEER will interpret the intent of the drawings and specifications to protect the OWNER against defects and deficiencies in construction on the part of the contractors. The ENGINEER will not, however, guarantee the performance by any contractor. 3. The ENGINEER will evaluate and determine acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s). 4. The ENGINEER will establish baselines for locating the work together with a suitable number of bench marks adjacent to the work as shown in the contract documents. 3 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 (Section B—Continued) 5. The ENGINEER will provide general engineering review of the work of the Contractor(s) as construction progresses to ascertain that the Contractor is conforming with the design concept. (a) ENGINEER shall have authority, as the OWNER's representative, to require special inspection of or testing of the work, and shall receive and review all certificates of inspections, testing and approvals required by laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, orders or the Contract Documents (but only to determine generally that their content complies with requirements of, and the results certified indicate compliance with, the Contract Documents). (b) During such engineering review, ENGINEER shall have the authority, as the OWNER's representative, to disapprove of or reject Contractor(s)' work while it is in progress if ENGINEER believes that such work will not produce a completed Project that conforms generally to the Contract Documents or that it will prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the Project as reflected in the Contract Documents. 6. The ENGINEER will provide resident construction observation. Resident construction observation shall consist of visual inspection of materials, equipment, or construction work for the purpose of ascertaining that the work is in substantial conformance with the contract documents and with the design intent. Such observation shall not be relied upon by others as acceptance of the work. The ENGINEER's undertaking hereunder shall not relieve the Contractor of Contractor's obligation to perform the work in conformity with the drawings and specifications and in a workmanlike manner; shall not make the ENGINEER an insurer of the Contractor's performance; and shall not impose upon the ENGINEER any obligation to see that the work is performed in a safe manner. Attachment 1 - The Limitations of Authority, Duties and Responsibilities of the Resident Construction Observer is attached to this Agreement. 7. The ENGINEER will cooperate and work closely with representatives of the OWNER. 8. Based on the ENGINEER's on-site observations as an experienced and qualified design professional, on information provided by the Resident Construction Observer, and upon review of applications for payment with the accompanying data and schedules by the Contractor, the ENGINEER: (a) Shall determine the amounts owing to Contractor(s) and recommend in writing payments to Contractor(s) in such amounts. Such recommendations of payment will constitute a representation to OWNER, based on such observations and review, that the work has progressed to the point indicated, and that, to the best of the ENGINEER's knowledge, information and belief, 4 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 (Section B—Continued) the quality of such work is generally in accordance with the Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of such work as a functioning whole prior to or upon substantial completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Contract Documents, and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation). (b) By recommending any payment, ENGINEER will not hereby be deemed to have represented that exhaustive, continuous or detailed reviews or examinations have been made by ENGINEER to check the quality or quantity of Contractor(s)' work as it is furnished and performed beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER in the Agreement and the Contract Documents. ENGINEER's review of Contractor(s)' work for the purposes of recommending payments will not impose on Engineer responsibility to supervise, direct or control such work or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto or Contractor(s) compliance with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. It will also not impose responsibility on ENGINEER to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes any Contractor has used the moneys paid on account of the Contract Price, or to determine that title to any of the work, materials equipment has passed to OWNER free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests, or encumbrances, or that there may not be other matters at issue between OWNER and Contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid. 9. The ENGINEER will prepare necessary contract change orders for approval of the OWNER, and others on a timely basis. 10. The ENGINEER will make a final review prior to the issuance of the statement of substantial completion of all construction and submit a written report to the OWNER. Prior to submitting the final pay estimate, the ENGINEER shall submit the statement of completion to and obtain the written acceptance of the facility from the OWNER. 11. The ENGINEER will provide the OWNER with one set of reproducible record (as-built) drawings, and two sets of prints at no additional cost to the OWNER. Such drawings will be based upon construction records provided by the contractor during construction and reviewed by the resident construction observer and from the resident construction observer's construction data. 12. If State Statutes require notices and advertisements of final payment, the ENGINEER shall assist in their preparation. 5 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 AMENDED 1/21/03 (Section B—Continued) 13. The ENGINEER will be available to furnish engineering services and consultations necessary to correct unforeseen project operation difficulties for a period of one year after the date of statement of substantial completion of the facility. This service will include instruction of the OWNER in initial project operation and maintenance but will not include supervision of normal operation of the system. Such consultation and advice shall be at the hourly rates as described in the attached "Standard Schedule of Charges", dated January 1, 2003. The ENGINEER will assist the OWNER in performing a review of the project during the 11th month after the date of the certificate of substantial completion. 14. The ENGINEER further agrees to obtain and maintain, at the ENGINEER's expense, such insurance as will protect the ENGINEER from claims under the Workman's Compensation Act and such comprehensive general liability insurance as will protect the OWNER and the ENGINEER from all claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance by the ENGINEER or by the ENGINEER's employees of the ENGINEER's functions and services required under this Agreement. 15. The ENGINEER will provide construction engineering services in accordance with the periods summarized in Attachment A: "Schedule -Water Works System Improvements" dated January 21, 2003 . If the above is not accomplished within the time period specified, this Agreement may be terminated by the OWNER. The time for completion may be extended by the OWNER for a reasonable time if completion is delayed due to unforeseeable cases beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the ENGINEER. SECTION C—COMPENSATION FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES 1. The OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for professional design engineering services in the amount of One Million Twenty Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Forty and 00/100 - Fixed Fee (FF) Dollars ($ 1,027,840 FF ) as summarized on Attachment B: "Summary of Compensation for Professional Engineering Services" dated January 21, 2003, and further summarized on Attachments B-1 through B- 16. (a) The compensation for the professional design engineering services shall be payable as follows: (1) A sum which does not exceed ninety percent (90%) of the total compensation payable under Section C-1 shall be paid in monthly increments for work actually completed and 6 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 AMENDED 1/21/03 (Section C—Continued) invoiced, for the preparation and submission to the OWNER and/or IEPA of the construction drawings, specifications, cost estimates and contract documents. (2) A sum which, together with the compensation paid pursuant to Section C-1(a)(1) above, equals one hundred percent (100%) of the total compensation due and payable in accord with Section C-1 above, shall be due immediately after the award of construction contract(s) is approved by the corporate authorities. 2. The OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for the administration of the construction contracts (Construction Administration) in the amount of Two Hundred Forty Seven Thousand Two Hundred Seventy and 00/100 — Fixed Fee (FF) Dollars ($ 247,270 FF ) as summarized on Attachment B: "Summary of Compensation for Professional Engineering Services"dated January 21, 2003. (a) The compensation for the construction administration services shall be payable as follows: (1) A sum which does not exceed ninety percent (90%) of the total compensation payable under Section C-2 shall be paid in monthly increments for work actually completed and invoiced, for the administration of the construction contracts. (2) A sum which, together with the compensation paid pursuant to Section C-2(a)(1) above, equals one hundred percent (100%) of the total compensation due and payable in accord with Section C-2 above, shall be due immediately after the final Contractor pay-out is processed. 3. The OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for the construction staking, construction observation (including the Resident Construction Observer), and the additional consultation and surveying services on the basis of Hourly Rates - HR as described on the attached "Standard Schedule of Charges" dated January 1, 2003. The estimated values are included in Attachment B. (a) The compensation for the construction staking, construction observation (including the Resident Construction Observer), and any additional consultation and surveying services shall be payable as follows: 7 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (Section C—Continued) (1) A sum which equals any charges for work actually completed and invoiced shall be paid at least once per month. 4. The compensation for any additional engineering services authorized by the OWNER pursuant to Section D shall be payable as follows: (a) A sum which equals any charges for work actually completed and invoiced shall be paid at least once per month. SECTION D—ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES In addition to the foregoing being performed, the following services may be provided UPON PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE OWNER. 1. Site surveys for water treatment plants, sewage treatment works, dams, reservoirs, and other similar special surveys as may be required. 2. Laboratory tests, well tests, borings, specialized geological soils hydraulic, or other studies recommended by the ENGINEER. 3. Property surveys, detailed description of sites, maps, drawings, or estimates related thereto; assistance in negotiating for land and easement rights. 4. Necessary data and filing maps for litigation, such as condemnation. 5. Redesigns ordered by the OWNER after final plans have been accepted by the OWNER and IEPA. 6. Appearances before courts or boards on matters of litigation or hearings related to the project. 7. Preparation of environmental impact assessments or environmental impact statements. 8. Making drawings from field measurements of existing facilities when required for planning additions or alterations thereto. 9. Services due to changes in the scope of the Project or its design, including but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, schedule or character of construction. 8 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (Section D—Continued) 10. Revising studies or reports which have previously been approved by the OWNER, or when revisions are due to cases beyond the control of the ENGINEER. 11. Preparation of design documents for alternate bids where major changes require additional documents. 12. Preparation of detailed renderings, exhibits or scale models for the Project. 13. Providing special analysis of the OWNER's needs such as owning and operating analysis, plan for operation and maintenance, OWNER's special operating drawings or charts, and any other similar analysis. 14. The preparation of feasibility studies, appraisals and evaluations, detailed quantity surveys of material and labor, and material audits or inventories by the OWNER. 15. Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by (1) work damaged by fire or other cause during construction, (2) defective or incomplete work of the Contractor, and/or (3) the Contractor's default on the Construction Contract due to delinquency or insolvency. 16, Providing design services relating to future facilities, systems and equipment which are not intended to be constructed or operated as a part of the Project. 17. Providing other services not otherwise provided for in this Agreement, including services normally furnished by the OWNER as described in Section F — SPECIAL PROVISIONS — Owner's Responsibilities. Payment for the services specified in this Section D shall be as agreed in writing between the OWNER and the ENGINEER prior to commencement of the work. The ENGINEER will render to OWNER for such services an itemized bill, separate from any other billing, once each month, for compensation for services performed hereunder during such period, the same to be due and payable by OWNER to the ENGINEER on or before the 10th day of the following period. Payment for services noted in D shall be at Actual Cost (AC), Fixed Fee (FF) or Hourly (HR). SECTION E -INTEREST ON UNPAID SUMS OWNER shall make all payments to ENGINEER in accord with the requirements of the Illinois Local Government Prompt Payment Act, 50 ILCS 505/1 et seq., including but not limited to the penalty provisions contained therein. 9 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE SECTION F-SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES (a) Provide to the ENGINEER all criteria, design and construction standards and full information as to the OWNER's requirements for the Project. (b) Designate a person authorized to act as the OWNER's representative. The OWNER or his representative shall receive and examine documents submitted by the ENGINEER, interpret and define the OWNER's policies and render decisions and authorizations in writing promptly to prevent unreasonable delay in the progress of the ENGINEER's services. (C) Furnish laboratory tests, air and water pollution tests, reports and inspections of samples, materials or other items required by law or by governmental authorities having jurisdiction over this Project, or as recommended by the ENGINEER. (d) Provide legal, accounting, right-of-way acquisition and insurance counseling services necessary for the Project, legal review of the construction Contract Documents, and such auditing services as the OWNER may require to account for expenditures of sums paid to the Contractor. (e) Furnish above services at the OWNER's expense and in such manner that the ENGINEER may rely upon them in the performance of his services under this Agreement and in accordance with the Project timetable. (f) In the event that the OWNER shall bring any suit, cause of action or counterclaim against the ENGINEER, to the extent that the ENGINEER shall prevail, the party initiating such action shall pay to the ENGINEER the cost and expenses incurred to answer and/or defend such action, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs. In no event shall the ENGINEER indemnify any other party for the consequences of that party's negligence, including failure to follow the ENGINEER's recommendations. (g) Guarantee full and free access for the ENGINEER to enter upon all property required for the performance of the ENGINEER's services under this Agreement. (h) Give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever the OWNER observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in the Project or other event which may substantially affect the ENGINEER's performance of services under this Agreement. 10 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 (Section F—Continued) (i) Protect and preserve all survey stakes and markers placed at the project site prior to the assumption of this responsibility by the Contractor and bear all costs of replacing stakes or markers damaged or removed during said time interval. 2. All original documents, including but not limited to ideas, designs, drawings and specifications, are to remain the property of the ENGINEER, however, the ENGINEER shall provide signed duplicate originals of same to the OWNER. Modifications of any signed duplicate original document not authorized by ENGINEER will be at OWNER's sole risk and without legal liability to the ENGINEER. Use of any incomplete, unsigned document will, likewise, be at the OWNER's sole risk and without legal liability to . the ENGINEER. 3. Delegation of Duties - Neither the OWNER nor the ENGINEER shall delegate his duties under this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 4. Extent of Agreement - This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the OWNER and the ENGINEER and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreement, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by the OWNER and the ENGINEER. 5. Governing Law - Unless otherwise specified within this Agreement, this Agreement shall be governed by the law of the principal place of business of the ENGINEER. 6. Access to Records: (a) The ENGINEER agrees to include subsections F-6(b) through F-6(e) below in all his contracts and all subcontracts directly related to project performance which are in excess of$25,000. (b) The ENGINEER shall maintain books, records, documents and other evidence directly pertinent to performance of Agency loan work under this Agreement consistent with generally accepted accounting standards in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Professional Standards (666 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10019; June 1, 1987). The agency or any of its duly authorized representatives shall have access to such books, records, documents and other evidence for the purpose of inspection, audit and copying. The ENGINEER will provide facilities for such access and inspection. 1 1 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 (Section F—Continued) (c) Audits conducted pursuant to this provision shall be in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. (d) The ENGINEER agrees to the disclosure of all information and reports resulting from access to records pursuant to subsection F-6(b) above, to the Agency. Where the audit concerns the ENGINEER, the auditing agency will afford the ENGINEER an opportunity for an audit exit conference and an opportunity to comment on the pertinent portions of the draft audit report. The final audit report will include the written comments, if any, of the audited parties. (e) Parties under subsection F-6(b) above shall be maintained and made available during performance on Agency loan work under this agreement and until three years from date of final Agency loan audit for the project. In addition, those records which relate to any "dispute" appeal under an Agency loan agreement, or litigation, or the settlement of claims arising out of such performance, costs or items to which an audit exception has been taken, shall be maintained and made available until three years after the date of resolution of such appeal, litigation, claim or exception. 7. Covenant Against Contingent Fees - The ENGINEER warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bonafide employees. For breach or violation of this warranty, the loan recipient shall have the right to annul this agreement without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee. 8. Certification Regarding Debarment—The ENGINEER certifies that the services of anyone that has been debarred or suspended under Federal Executive Order 12549 has not, and will not, be used for work under this Agreement. 9. Affirmative Action — The ENGINEER agrees to take affirmative steps to assure that small, minority and women's Business enterprises are utilized when possible as sources of supplies, equipment, construction and services in accordance with Part 35.3145(d). As required by the award conditions of USEPA's Assistance Agreement with IEPA, the ENGINEER acknowledges that the fair share percentages are 2% for MBE's and 11`)/0 for WBE's. 10. In the event any provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid and unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall be valid and binding upon the parties. 12 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 (Section F—Continued) 11. The ENGINEER has not been retained or compensated to provide design services relating to the Contractor's safety precautions or to means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures required by the Contractor to perform his work but not relating to the final or completed structure; omitted services include but are not limited to shoring, scaffolding, underpinning, temporary retainment of excavations and any erection methods and temporary bracing. 12. The ENGINEER intends to render his services under this Agreement in accordance with generally accepted professional practices for the intended use of the Project. 13. Since the ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s) methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, his opinions of probable Project Costs and Construction Costs provided for herein are to be made on the basis of his experience and qualifications and represent his best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with the construction industry; but the ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual project or construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by him. If prior to the bidding or negotiating phase OWNER wishes greater assurance as to project or construction costs he shall employ an independent cost estimator. 14. TERMINATION (a) Should the OWNER decide to abandon, discontinue, or terminate the Project at any stage of development, the ENGINEER shall receive seven (7) days written notice and be compensated for their services through the appropriate fee schedule provided for in the Agreement to date of abandonment, discontinuance or termination. (b) In the event the project is delayed for causes beyond the control of the ENGINEER for a period of six months or more, the ENGINEER shall be paid for has services to the beginning of the delay on the basis of actual cost plus 125% to cover profit, overhead and readiness to serve - "actual cost" being defined as material costs plus actual payrolls, insurance, social security and retirement deductions. Traveling and other out-of-pocket expense will be reimbursed to the ENGINEER at his actual cost. 13 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed, or caused to be executed by their duly authorized officials, this Agreement in duplicate on the respective dates indicated below. (SEAL) OWNER: City of Yorkville By ATTEST Print Name Art Prochaska Print Name Ms. Jackie Milschewski Title Mayor Title City Clerk Date (SEAL) ENGINEER: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. ATTEST ciY\ \ , 1 Print Name James K. Michels, P.E. Print Name Ms. Dawn M. Tillman Title President Title Secretary Date //2/Ao S \\eeint\EEI-DOCS\PUBLIC\Yorkville\2001\Yo0101 Well No.6 Improvements\Doc\agreement.doc 14 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ATTACHMENT 1 to Agreement for Professional Engineering Services THE LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE RESIDENT CONSTRUCTION OBSERVER ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Resident Construction Observer shall act under the direct supervision of the ENGINEER, shall be the ENGINEER's agent in all matters relating to on-site construction review of the Contractor's work, shall communicate only with the ENGINEER and the Contractor (or Contractors), and shall communicate with subcontractors only through the Contractor or his authorized superintendent. The OWNER shall communicate with the Resident Construction Observer only through the ENGINEER. 2. The Resident Construction Observer shall review and inspect on-site construction activities of the Contractor relating to portions of the Project designed and specified by the Engineer as contained in the Construction Contract Documents. 3. Specifically omitted from the Resident Construction Observer's duties are any review of the Contractor's safety precautions, or the means, methods, sequences, or procedures required for the Contractor to perform the work but not relating to the final or completed Project. Omitted design or review services include but are not limited to shoring, scaffolding, underpinning, temporary retainment of excavations and any erection methods and temporary bracing. 4. The specific duties and responsibilities of the Resident Construction Observer are enumerated as follows: (a) Schedules: Review the progress schedule, schedule of Shop Drawing submissions and schedule of values prepared by Contractor and consult with ENGINEER concerning their acceptability. (b) Conferences: Attend preconstruction conferences. Arrange a schedule of progress meetings and other job conferences as required in consultation with ENGINEER and notify those expected to attend in advance. Attend meetings and maintain and circulate copies of minutes thereof. (c) Liason: (1) Serve as ENGINEER's liaison with Contractor, working principally through Contractor's superintendent and assist him in understanding the intent of the Contract Documents. 1 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (Attachment 1 —Continued) (2) Assist ENGINEER in serving as OWNER's liaison with Contractor when Contractor's operations affect OWNER's on-site operations. (3) As requested by ENGINEER, assist in obtaining from OWNER additional details or information, when required at the job site for proper erection of the work. (d) Shop Drawings and Samples: (1) Receive and record date of receipt of Shop Drawings and samples. (2) Receive samples which are furnished at the site by Contractor, and notify ENGINEER of their availability for examination. (3) Advise ENGINEER and Contractor or its superintendent immediately of the commencement of any work requiring a Shop Drawing or sample submission if the submission has not been approved by ENGINEER. (e) Review of Work, Rejection of Defective Work, Inspections and Tests: (1) Conduct on-site inspection of the work in progress to assist ENGINEER in determining if the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents and that completed work will conform to the Contract Documents. (2) Report to ENGINEER whenever he believes that any work is unsatisfactory, faulty or defective or does not conform to the Contract Documents, or does not meet the requirements of any inspections, test or approval required to be made or has been damaged prior to final payment; and advise ENGINEER when he believes work should be corrected or rejected or should be uncovered for inspection, or requires special testing, inspection or approval. (3) Verify that tests, equipment and systems start-ups, and operating and maintenance instructions are conducted as required by the Contract Documents and in presence of the required personnel, and that Contractor maintains adequate records thereof; observe, record and report to ENGINEER appropriate details relative to the test procedures and start-ups. 1_ 2 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (Attachment 1 —Continued) (4) Accompany visiting inspectors representing public or other agencies having jurisdiction over the Project, record the outcome of these inspections and report to ENGINEER. (f) Interpretation of Contract Documents: Transmit to Contractor ENGINEER's clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents. (g) Modifications: Consider and evaluate Contractor's suggestions for modifications in Drawings or Specifications and report them with recommendations to ENGINEER. (h) Records: (1) Maintain at the job site orderly files for correspondence, reports of job conferences, Shop Drawings and samples submissions, reproductions of original Contract Documents including all addenda, change orders, field orders, additional drawings issued subsequent to the execution of the Contract, ENGINEER's clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents, progress reports, and other Project related documents. (2) Keep a diary or log book, recording hours on the job site, weather conditions, data relative to questions of extras or deductions, list of visiting officials and representatives of manufacturers, fabricators, suppliers and distributors, daily activities, decisions, observations in general and specific observations in more detail as in the case of observing test procedures. Send copies to ENGINEER. (3) Record names, addresses and telephone numbers of all Contractors, subcontractors and major suppliers of materials and equipment. (i) Reports: (1) Furnish ENGINEER periodic reports as required of progress of the work and Contractor's compliance with the approved progress schedule and schedule of Shop Drawing submissions. (2) Consult with ENGINEER in advance of schedule major tests, inspections or start of important phases of the work. (3) Report immediately to ENGINEER upon the occurrence of any accident. 3 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (Attachment 1 —Continued) (i) Payment Requisitions: Review applications for payment with Contractor for compliance with the established procedure for their submission and forward them with recommendations to ENGINEER, noting particularly their relation to the schedule of values, work completed and materials and equipment delivered at the site but not incorporated in the work. (k) Certificates, Maintenance and Operating Manuals: During the course of the work, verify that certificates, maintenance and operation manuals and other data required to be assembled and furnished by Contractor are applicable to the items actually installed; and deliver this material to ENGINEER for his review and forwarding to OWNER prior to final acceptance of the work. (I) Completion: (1) Before ENGINEER issues a Statement of Substantial Completion, submit to Contractor a list of observed items requiring completion or correction. (2) Conduct final review in the company of ENGINEER, OWNER and Contractor and prepare a final list of items to be completed or corrected. (3) Verify that all items on final list have been completed or corrected and make recommendations to ENGINEER concerning acceptance. \\EEINT\EEI-DOCS\PUBLIC\Yorkville\2001\YO0101 Well No.6 Improvements\Doc\agreement.doc 4 i CONTRACT Al. --- CONTRACT)!.5 _ WELL No.6 WELL-- ---- NOR HEL6VA'-� — i., 'r• - ..- "--.. -WA -STORAGE HOUSE EAT AND - �---'-----_ TA TREATMENT FACILITY 1-3-7 CONTRACT B 1 / / / !/ WELL No.6 - _ 71 -1[ � �- 7/ I 1 [ 1 \ /ie.,/ r__/_,,, / C"44zIK,CR ROAD EAE FEET III (/ FEET _] q! i a SCALE E. 110 CONTRACT B.6 II 1____.------ \ / 0 / / WELL No.6 WHS F j p' / LIFT STATION AN T 1 I - / fn tri I FORCEMAIN I 1 -t. --F-----F-------------- ----- -- --------------- I i C JO I ' l _ ji 1. \ Ii ME o — IL - Irk ''�" , �� -'1 I 1 �r �� / /1/I , ,-,.., -ill j 7 fi —___. --CONTRACT A.2 G'� \ i\ _-.I �`I - �2N RT.47 WM AND �� `' , ✓ � � /' 1 _.-i NORTHWEST BPl l I � 0� _ _ \� \ __ I \v� �`�2\ •\ /� - 1 PRV STA "- J-----�� _l_ _ y \ - 0 ., <" • \ i �� �\ , %�� _� �V A OPS \ ,_ I ydam �� ��. \ \\-\\O-1 1 A ��i �� r__,_, I \,,,:, ' 1 \ �, •� \, /rte A,, \ 0:0-� i.\ ' yam'-� 0.%�� ___ v A " -� � 1 /IIS \/\ \ / t II - T --,LA" ,I I ' \ _i -----/ ' / I 1 i �� �i .,// l �_ r I / \ \ ILO \, v ? WELL�o 6 J • ft l ZONE 1 _ ( \"� .../,--,-,,( f A ti --„,,,,://7 / I N•RTH- •N I -j �� Z� (TTS � v / , PRESSURE f -' [it ' IIIIII ii . \ rf ZONE No.2 itra \ \• / (NORTH CENTRA ;�_ T �` �\( - C-)----- \ ---- --, \. / / / / '-I" 'awl / _Ii I / �� � ' . _! n\ lc t_ CT L. ,,Iswu / -,4,+yy • i �C. G �- l i \ �3� CONTRACT BA, C 7 �: —1�' • I WELLS No.3 6 4'� __� +`; < 1,___ - /I�_ ,�1��� e-"' :. �� / /` _,.-.7--v,',e1;:-1,\--/IY<N,,,,--1-:,::::-?<\-- -..-:'\' 1:1,..__:;17:1 - --1_-- TREATMENT FACILITY 11:1 / ".� a___ �_ ili: . „ �/,yl _ 14 WM ,Litoitmee. --� CONTRACT 8.3 _- --_--t Aram _ _ __ 7 \ WELL No.364- W EN el /� ,�Mal JV C q ��� f �al� CONTRACT C.3 �'> �I// �� .1�. l .- 7/� L/ ®� Nn • N■ / 1 'INISHE I 'I �IV'•/1I P fIII }-- FINISHED - ' \� ',, / r l Ike'/:' If\S i 1 - - MQKIN _ -' G ETRE 1 �� + _._.- .i � -� 9� l t, , in RNER Rom.- I V\ V I I:I o.. ' �= _ --t 'C+4iy"�, -J 11',,M11,-t i _ ,,w �, I.���p� � ! �f \ \ __ Ye •a,VM r. 9 Fox River \ • �-., > rte/ I - �,1 / ., -- -T✓. I \ -r c BI,,,i l ✓F j; i yam•6I �Uueu� 11 ti ry l , t lt- 1 1 � Q/ �\ 6I if, 't E 1 CON f WELL „+. Id T Ei I FINISHED WM H -- e a 1� �'' O7- 2 V - -. �� 7 I // G:f 9Y�! n I I ,EFT_ NED - + f J b0,113 elft$' IIif,' ' F \/ n+riiit I Y �`. I / Q �\ \ d `f4f � p OR�(VILLE �/ pQ IV- j i - SOUTH CENT v I� �p� � Fp ��1 �'�--� /�' 1 �IBPI PRV STATION �" \ A „...,,,,, _ -----:----\- LI, , 1 -, 1 1 f •NTRACT C.4 �. `\ 1 , �L ,. BP/PRV STATION __ __ ___ - ---__--,-- \ I I '� - -1- .- - ,` - \�1 ;1 ���• - ::- L_.. _ 0,000 11 `` � �. �v �:�' CONTRACT C.1 -- \\--7:-_::_--71, _-�_=�I j \ L BE '��'- V "I I -- GAL , ���� SOUTH WATER ,` O \<�r, ? \ORALE TANK �I P�NENa'1 ZONEI \ CON - CT C.5 LJ'a ----ROUTH �� :.,� - Ll ZO ENt�' : 1 l _.-CENTRAL !y( .�7 C SOUTH PRV STATION ' .�.'y- OptN i 1 i r� �� PO E Z55N O El V -',\ �� � �� Ea�W.S.T. y IN kE N \ „ �� � �� �/ IP N N Z FAIRGROUNDS \ ZGN \ . \ 7 \ 004I A ' / i KEI�pALL COUNTY 1� \_� 46\ ,� �� r-I I ��� -` ILS IN \ �� \I \�• I1 ,' I-A#'1.111) I _ CONTRACT f3.6 �l Rp�/�'E • 7 i. +`/ �N i _5-/_ "* ��l ,.�ffi 7"\,__ S--,Y /� / � CONTRACTC\ --- ---- Q ( L � - - j\ C NN WELL No.4' _ - r_ f I I I `\�: ' I EXISTING 6"WATER MAIN ATER MAIN PRE I' v EXISTING 10'EXISTING 8"WWATER MAIN ZONE No.4(SOUTH ZONE) I \ '-'---17-ir1 [{� /Q I \`J,,1/LI \ `/' I EXISTING 12"WATER MAIN - ' ''/A / p - �C I ��y'/ EXISTING 16"WATER MAIN Engineering Enterprises,Inc. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROD. N0. Y00101 1112 Consulting Engineers KENDALL COUNTY, IWNOIS u PROJECT PLAN FILE No. Y0010103 52 Wheeler Rood Sugar Grove, Illinois 50554 63O/466-8330 n&rr Fr i,ir, 1 .. 1 ^� �u ^ �rY. •M'.,,-.`'''`om , r ��'+'tt w1 + `a' i".. RF F' 'i' ' ,:'-'4,,:.-.';-3. 6 t1•* • I ' ASF�IJN ii . a ROUT 3Q ems "' ' �`a, r �• -;-,4-_,,..7,1 , 'a c,.i�.;'.: r 1 t'' ,r,.�+ ka •C,It„,,,-, • " .1 ` $1 ` 4 u'9 k� Q�4' s. JM.li '-• ( 4, r �a CONTRACT A.1 /s� a`! CONTRACT 8.5 }�; at°' " a{"+ NORTH ELEVATED '",. WELL No. 6 WELL, ' r" " TM ' ;.y WATER STORAGE t HOUSE AND i •� ,g o yY, f " 1.1;,,, 2000' 0' 2000' 4000' 1. y �,,, ��• i��. '"i,��'6�`r/++ a i T a 4'"�,� ',:": TREATMENTFACILITY t� SCALE FEET ‘t a :aS, •Ct ,;:,•47k,,,- -`144(' �'. x..r '-! , p t + ",.• #t, • r '��„ s 9 s ' e t. .� „ �( .r }� yap l: ',� j ri i CONTRACT B.4 ' .,..r yr •_ r �`. - , 4a 10- .S ,. i, " , • : t:,.`6,,'71` f ..Y "IP"iy,�•� ' r WELL No. 6 ''14,t14-4- VA'''''-., A'1 :r 0 '''p**-,..,,, r fi " }, , ' ," t .blaF a w + ,s - ly E, �.. r+..' ..IosT yy '11 4�+'S). ,, e x ti . ''''''1, 1 ) ' 1-;-1/4",-:::: ,17"74:;;;42,44t":;,..::',' r,.'; ''•�,�! :. -.. k y,. .�,a'+l t i'y�i^A f w,•:, a�..; 9' r-'.j' 4 "� 'f' -�� � � i '411f.il t / j + ,i6 t TwJ714,11,4>:',,:i "",-,, j J ; CONTRACT B.6 7 ° j �4;:" " f «; �" ^�l ,i• .t° WELL NO. 6WH& • gy� c %, / tF.• a, tqyd,�' .. '�2.t"� t � �; ;o• '/ ...n ,�.i #v 'r �� �., �It � '}ks'� ti� r -:',. { wnom, :;,,..''‘t-go,,,, ra LIFT STATIONND # t: r # + ( �F i.. ">t to '. #?$ � ;ip FORCEMAIN ' ki r-�""`fi `mi.71.6tkt.gh.4,10.1:,,..,ItrY.'�t-g .irJ '." L/ rah t« .,.;__-,i4,--7;;,•,,,----„;rr €, a : � .::yr „x• ' r 4,r " t ,.,,,,,,i„,-. q��y �,r�'l� R +'.'f "�.. '�a .d1? 5°'.'3r- e. .., + t 9Pr ""1 ...r i r -'�, -i fr, v '`f j'' v,✓e, •_:r 6' ,`£P'r b i.' ,gym..• n.• t:W '„ +, n ',.rf a �' { 51 , ,,,,4,.;--:!,,,,,,,Y •,"' ' '_ i.4.-74,-,r, ., d`j,y"� a 4' .4 H ., r 1:1...,: t PJ .E'L:' ',,,, :,, a,�•SY ,J ,rN, .{1+. ..: ,° 1 ' l} Y a , {',, a ! ,! y 4 ..11''.%:;..:-F y i :4 „ :. . CONTRACT A.2 iw, �' t , ••' d,' , •• - i+ .:',,-..:,,,„',t,-` f 3.fb" f a d 0'' • ;,,,,,E1:3„.,, `4, mow' r .? '.- a !_ ' -,4.44.A,,-1v, � " t '., ;. ' �� a RT. 47 WM AND , ti y � ew ✓ sc,�f r4.107� , if .4-4,,,',•.1,.f. � : NORTHWEST BP/ .,P A„ '�` ':-444;41;.'-',..,di.,: 0 t � ?".-!:,..1,-..:;,,,,,,r...,.,,�: ' ` ;�x ,$' alrt ° PRV STATION �s- ;!>M f r ;y f� vim,. • 4 '- , , , rM *-�>`'' s F 'C• •a x f. ,il_ .,f� sus��'�'g"��, :4,....i.,, � 4,-,--,..,;", ��;i� lk�.'•.. r, 7'f y�c '.Y. ray t e.T'�'yb • /0,0,„' •'- � .-..' ',� , } �_�l i_ t.y,t,t 1 '•i� m'°i f f� 1 r -•rr-''�'" - 1 ac,; .'". •ATI , {�r *.Y '+, ...t4; r �'K'M c" '•'' ,,...,,. ,. \ t at+ , 4 fA Q�. ,. , +:_i ,,,,.: It w h� F�:1 va • ,'.a^'y • '''t'-.;.,...1$•:'..' 5 T' '.;?t ,;.,;;',,....,.;,‘,s.:;-..-1 4R 1,'' 2? f`Y' - vy,.�y '�K 4_..:....,.. �' ..,,,,„4:„ ,:,t , Z �f•w '.y Y"°:' f `fit .,rt',�} �y�"y'.y ' r. ! � y%f r'1t tr e°�.t.. } i � �"i, 1M .�" n.�it , ;,c' ay �• � st ,�ae�. � �1 +,t �''� t(t• s,`��'69rr' icyG �� .�.; r�if�) • � ,.�y 7C�::- .W! isi ✓t tlbW •Y •f...1$• s`� ,rilit •° *',r� t r _, 4.('" ,t. ‘',,,,,I,,-..--,,,,,,e.:.i ,.' i :Gr, ;;' .I' .ria" .''.:&7+ irb', .-rte �'•' ,/qf� � �' � � �•{ �. ��•, ',a�'.y, �„ �'•'y�` r. ti: a w 1,�r;: � ��'Y: � � y , CONTRACTA.2 .Y.:7';'• ? ::rd r"4,4,a. i a � ,s . ,F;•, .� RT. 47 WM AND 1•,.'"•:'if )t 5 6444,-,' rot' z.,�l,'a ' Q ��' NORTHWEST BP/ ',,,..--;; ;*/*,,-,:;; i� M"- ' � �, j p'r s •� ,�,,d .T 'R+�` -.447P::,,,;';,''', :','-;T �, , ? r �,,w�,'',,';',„.''?Y':.:,/��,; y/4 f �'�I r ��, f R '.",;$4! PRV STATION n� ✓fz ,.. c '. L� +,,�, y a,r„ Y� , • _ � ,,�,r,, �, sv .� n� i�,. =::". F - I ��p` '_' ,F •{t i. ,.. ,!.;-,T.,-;d Q,+, .z ura yy.t 1 ,+p; r a + a , 'z-,,,,;....,,'A.'`� '' T�` �" ,i`�✓�`d r:'•`���a�`Fak: ,, ^ :1� .:47,..,,,,' , s, 4s `r .-r ,„r '�='� � •�� t t ,f�c k% Wyk?�� � 1,eny{ "' {r« _ '�+.. , 1� �.t •..� �,r5-/ �V'h� 7 l s, ��' �,.r c,�, k ../,,,'1' �' + -...4., a,ar t. :�' _. �.,,�j ' Vi,•e ,,,,,,,,,. ....41.:,;f,,-.1,,,'-,,,h;;',,,,:::,?,„,., � � 4 t.: r' "1r .,.,,,,,,11.7-0;-,,,,,-,.-4-• ''' -'- f "� ji. yy-. �ii 'kir • w;� sy p t' t . •, • :��c./ r ;z4r -, ;•i , ',#-~ * .s� ' _ � ��g,� , ,?, I ^fit E, >� 9„b � i a L.,y f 1, wy +� •:::::i"2",2-5=',, I.,",, r �+' .mk-J , ""''i"a1c (/.'t"� a " 5 '� 7,'„V:c '` ,,,,,,',,,i; 1 r +f', 'r ,+a • :',411'!„.41,-' �''�'� r , .«1' 'r -......,.44,1,;(c.,, i, 'r':�t4. "�3r 'st �" ,„ • �., {' :Y r.tiHs< F, 11� • �1„ y ,w. ,# .�' � : � '_.. �4P ",L , :C,� � f • oyi'',• r t4 ti,' -'"� �! � `-- `__. ._.� "..-9:-.-' " ,+�`r• a .�'1}� .- of :43...3-4.: ,,,,, �J ' '' �a+�'� t 1�n'�1.:�t�'�R�'1 ,,, \'�`•� �� �.•�,,,+ tt rY' t�•: { � �R -. ll„r4- i '' ....'-'-..,'',:k: NTRACT �► 'F z YI.` -1-‘0,7„:'44,4,49,4;" f�� t. t c P.. i ‘0 ,-,$ WELLS No. 3&4 M I Rf r r" > , " �, ,/ ti ;,v ,, fe? 'rr' Dg r ` .+•et_ t �i 'Y ,� "+',7 'Yt'f •i4 t v9k' ... i 4`'."¢ y, T''. S' � � ,:.,-,1:;:i-.;" � / r ,"ii?'sk r, � a� . .y �.� .:;.,:i4-,;,, Rlt, � TREATMENT FACILITY " "'� � � ,!.0..;:,`,-',,4:7,.`,71,,f4-'r' '�OSx • , ! „4-44,.-,.. yx tr x n ,i M .rl '. •✓' lir •,',#.:&,":••••,i. ' , y +' d + n "`T. :'�C'. ri.,F • CONTRACT 6.3 "• : t,t �Z ei� l� w' a " r �} : i. S w t fA« 1.� �.,,Q„ r� .$y Y,_..._� , . ,,<a .._;_ � ?7 t,it ' ,.7� 'i�! �, ,.,+,1-,4.,.., N '�i' .i,,,,,..,41, -J�• � .. �' WELLS No. 3&4 RAW �"' � •• � �°5flil�l� �.• ` -. . CONTRACT C.3 *1�,,"w�'� � ,, '� ,'� r� 5�•� ;: :„ WM & KING STREET 1 $� ; f LIBERTY STREET �k .:1 1.-,4,,,i5::::,•,,--..,;,,,,,7 7, - FINISHED WMA pv 1 ??TM. rg�{�! 3 FINISHED WM � a _ { ' itr, /eD ::21.,..../.-..,...10i,...- . a a (�>�i' „ I,f �'•' 1 atf r y. 4:4., .;•?,! $ } ✓r, �I � ,....".,,,,,,,,t.-.4_114, .-- I� '�y,�r`{ •1�' �t� l''', ��ra, �:trE''s.7 vr�r•Yr, '' ,+ t :�'�',��Y y a�j 9�'�a � ,,x M1 � \ -F,,,.. • .'•�• I. R ."+ Y4, y^S Cr'.� >' '� reel, { •'f,w r..,-,11?---::. ---::Ati,i, ._ .'• x• i?L'i 9'w__,. '* r „ � t R Y ';../ . €' ,,,S'.', -�,--,...,„4. ,,,...:., ""fru .K p a"'0.' t.{:. f r + t '.f' '� '��rip5 M .' 1•�_ w '�*'� • '�' 'tom Y«,'_ r,' CONTRACT B.2 N-R t y STATE STREET • ��ia�- ,t F+ r;t, t' � '.1 CONTRACT C.2 tm , ,s74! +cr ,` '} F• INISHED WM a � t i 1 rW `, 5 1 MILL&VAN EMMON " t a t -- f�'' t r• 7r' , `'_:-7,I� °i: w.►r4 p ,1if :,,1 STREET FINISHED WM J; •.• n ,7',, k ', � .y , A:et k,-r t ,y f'i. 11.dI, f'�..� ta�Av.f 'c t';: •"�.'� y •wl` rr„..,,,,4,..a ,a e ?°�'� {�:a'y •*•',!`-12-. .4‘,•'4,;.-•V � .:i ��, � � ��' rf- � � � a�9� � • • l'-''',•,• F,,•,..4,;=;;,,,r,'; ` tt � a �: �'k e, d r i t �K ' i u a F 3'F4 r rkt • ,1_,'(:-,;;;0„...." .(0...e-f,", _1 , v ' .: .: to . ,. . i. r .„t "-'---'n--, -' ti'''�1 .1t.t'':94,`...1 ,• ' • '" a e 1 ''.1''''''t �Yr' ,`�O�j;. �, �� t � � '�• �� "!/..� ''� CONTRACT C.4 4'..;:%-‘,....? �a..+ 1 J, � t , r& a,.��,.�L"�ffi�3.�� � '' ,,e�1 a '.:;''1:1-;' "°+� ` t;s.' { ,ti..trr • ,��I,T 4 SOUTH BP/PRV STATION 14,.",-14'...- .>< ' '» ;w .0:-;-....,,..4.,,,,,:-..-, �yy�,• � ?� 1'' "� �` ' yy`�E'i „�• •y,. ,j ,,�. 4yp' :.It.�' ,,,, l'--'''',/-.' ' v N,.. .:J> jc.•, �0�D,�{ "•-*:::',.1 Wd' . • r+i R v % .-4..;„7„?..-.t..1.1.. .. ' 'p,."��t o .fi r,. , ,,, '.T,7'• _ ` ,��w i. ; .'... '''.....0,j,14;„..,... '�A s _-._-41-.1' 4 p •, ' €y.-! ...••,,,.....4t A....-• �pr',i, t� �� t '' , , ',� CONTRACTtC.S --�";' ' '' n t N f.. , CONTRACT C.1 L a '' .• _. int r," ,, • ` " SOUTH PRV STATION � "� I "�'_�. 1 � :; j •+�'' ' SOUTH WATER �� �,'�,�,,, . �k " W �� ',,,'°51-,-,''t '',11k,,...,-.;, " 5x1` ' p �T y t, STORAGE TANK i �', K � . �"Mt'q"4* �,pr '�/ Ti,,,,,y� a- � rt _ � 4. �L-- �` ' ..1:., a � N� r'�,s � t yi . +' b • Ra'` �, F r ., q`a 4, '• s ) ,(,,,0,7.-, N',... .,.., ' ° ' , '' yrv, t i '' ' st 5 ,. � 1 -fi,.,,,i„ � r. ,f.,."� r. `I T s7• +'; ',X !"+ s.�t xi a Y�r,�o4t* avr �'/ r I a y "�{j 7I ' ,_,‘,AL.-:rP4 4 �, 3 ,� r " a *.F .- , CONTRACT C.6 .,'..."4,..e,;,-,,,me'". Iry n�` a yr ` a , ,�..� ro V44i3 1 I r. ..; WELL No. 7 a CONTRACT C.7 f;^ sta i a,f f,-a• y� 1 •s !as Y.. 1! -- y �.: Akt fin, WELL No.7 ' r ;j • ,.,4L,„,;;. `� ;'� ,2, r !� WH&TF ', !1 1 ' V'' ice, � �+. :f t 4 • ,�. '� .N, d �6 tt J "5'11,. ,k � f.�a'',•- '.{'Ott p� "'.ey e q.,' '•yz Kr r 1 f, r• a • ''S •�'�1. ..,t• "�5° y �ry�: �R �H'�'n U�t r,�,•\.� r� '�'"�:.�, rt,"r' • ' 'TMw7.:,,,.,..,;,,,,,,,,e, 'r ,�.��'�r,�; '�r d� 9 r y� , ,t ,: �,T •M�"`,' °� ,w.. �'t. rig, ,. f 5'11 1 ; 't si.y 6 �y M" �"'` 'M k`$ 1 �,� 4,�' r i '# . w.''1 / ' ' _J }� t : ,. �Yimp'. r u. „ iaa, P'^ p`,A ,. " y' '. • .da r ' �4 •< � Z',f9 4. .� W '' ''' :t e 1+ �..,1 ,-"r�"N� .;, •'Y T Ir ` �, 4444. I •°f` ^ a,� .. 1, ',.,icit;4 •wrY•` e �,,: , '1`' ay' :� ''4'M+� m{a, ,� t, +r . t „ .%w dR a>•_, I, ,+m r a y�`, Z -y ' .( •.:'":4i i ,�k -1 4117 y :i.{. '�K'aY[w. �,.Nm,.e.. h ;r !p `F� ' Q 6▪ ,,.: e • KK Sr/ y ,9,` "R .� T �'. �`+ o • s ii- ,...."4y_ f. 1 Y•11 Qin , -- , l 'a. _-�,y '. -�;,.. �r Art,•�.. 6 ,]( A t(} ,,-la `E� 4a° f f t t {1 r�. . i1 ?, �4-17t . •r' E,_. 77: 3-,,,.,` q •t9a'. ''^;' r `` ,,, {' R �y� $, •,.,«- 1 shv"t:����� � '�(i - � � .t�_ ��q.AA �• • �tf�'.� . -I„y�q"4"' .�V'•f f� �.�Y ��'•�1 },fl,""i; . '!h4'��r�"1is. ,ay t� , �{'��' ' '+vv+wt� ' �.. .. �i-r .5 I. 1 ' e,.t r .., .an i '. 3 ' '".-1., ,j 1 [ �r♦r� , - . ti�'•'t- > i`i- ~i., S�..r , .'y, a;.. ' 1{, • ..a 1 ,. t r y , 1 y '• y'' R •••1t • /tJfr C a , tfe ..,.,, :d �''4 t, 4?iv,tit . ,'� Se' • a I+° A,+� r , .' `y fa ,.' .w* . !� � rr� ' ''� �` a"'•tl * rnA ' � 1,,_,,,,,.,, ti� ft �� t t �' 4c,. "tntw d'+ N.,... arc a,yr,n"�'f'�.,� �7M,�"',�'*�"oAr. ~ �,� •s<• •'�"�'+r ! 'p" 1 �4 t i'�::..11t-el:.n" t�Y+.^y,# � 9 .�. `.�y .;� � , r• „-� as i :;W 'y:''rs., f' y { �'. pf :•t'4 15.1`;{' •- ' , +�R 1, 3"' r`" Ad 3 d �''r ';: • y '� «,, �pp�'a ��{ s,.�1e1, ''`,4 � x .,'�q � t `.t �,. ' a� :4,5'1;,:;,::, r� `�t`" y fi ,�j ii f -ilb`I •�.. '-r ,q�..:�•''� ;' �Ni`Y�'�, ga�d����LLl! �r •• �w�y • y� +I�4`�. a{ ' fa r ��` P L N. tP; �s, ,• 4`"•.wtt'~i'u:h ak"YV'fleL'+•x at.:r'rtp. 't. �(�.. it ro"3i,'�a t,:. r�r ,�•mi� �Si + v :_ IF' 7P t,,,y♦ r,,., ,"i�r� ��8, o.•�W{ TY' 1 ' °+"'NA`.•, *.r'r ,.w': ▪r ,,r4 r 4114-0141#,.... .. �% ✓y, ,i �•, "� k � adt M!t ,..' t i r:. .. ,m a „. 1�cA: � , t+,;"+n., ��7 '''i::'�+ x 4•,��••��;,,• !x �-,,,),•14.t,-!,,,;•;,. �1,,,: � ����]^ y7 ti�?', 'r �+►�. v� �a4 . .,','''''''.,,q, l/1 s.�"" 1�T' -w ..,c-k!,,.. r-, , r+�� I t ; li i .f,' • " ' 'f tl .+• � .. e ll' p� ! ,wr�`" ,y t r ; a t t r r v � --sr ',TT/s,:, '� 1 m.1 a:r. ".0A, ":�}'7L..7';'o � e'pK :fi q�c�,,, � F. F �, � ,�,,�, ,�'.5 �•i !a '*8 +�, 1 ,t . It .t `.� f• �i w' ' ;',.' '� 'TM y,�:fi•:a:.z :i'i IT" •fl ' /,S'i { ,•,. '',..,..:r.:1-. ; ' �µt r,,,„M"1 ,tr s ' °•-�, j ' IF r, r , i to , a 7t+I .- .1'•,,. w'r, .- r s.. ;i s11. P, ,- t :. .L r � '� .6 '�"� ' e '� .'$r.-.. 5. y"�',."wL1,44: *�i, �t� :�" 3 F fi M�1' Y•`I,�.,.11-.",:i,,:::ldiPn. t,as ,t ,: +• r 1., t.t` {..44,4---=',4v t r NN6 ' °1 {,r„• y ,r* 'P�r_4r, • 'is .a". .iut :,yam ` .';;;,� i' 4 y�$.� fs ,b,, - r c"",.,.` , ?'+ it i ,.. •. , _ V i a.?^f: . `+7�'t`2 i';.''..: ry : • iti •.i' ... ,!'a�F• • lir --. i,., j.• tP-t r s 'r '' .¢,r'; (}� k,,4-a,. . f r4++ 'a..�1 ,'".•: e6 , Z. .•.y...:it?r.�liM •i' yy • +i' -n .[3•: i. a M ,.'� . . P' _t"�4 �i ,.;,;'.-...:1,z14-;,..., i``, .w P "I.r,.:. uS"4'a 1- .Jr t i- • _:.-,-;,:11-..:,:-.,,,, • ,-+,r+ �'�' ,_r•c rr:Fft. .• .4 g i4:1,( t:a ' { "kwz a r 'dna *,^`{ 01,..-4 ti�L't., 'T.; ���1.5 ,. ♦W 11'.1•4^:'-'' L�-�?`9 �,,...4,-;-y..��..f'�`' x/.I ( A�� ,� t '� J'+' �'A i�.r 1� 4 � T I { S• �'�tk• �'.G � ..di V 7.4 r '�' w-'. % '?M r:''yl d ,�� 4. ....?•,..t i }4 �f:'�'r a,r,''''-. ce y 'rt �.,, -k4-',...,;4,..: ` "� 9 ,i ' ;,�i i'tif f, y "�;.. ' 1 ' ,:. ..pd-� `i.:‘'.1 1 � t 11"t, '. ' - '• > e ^i�' r ''''' ' ,r �"- ys i.,,,,-,.. s+ " ,' e, a d':r:v# -y '" .r , rr A �ry 1 i' t� '':::":71E,04'.,. �'; .• ' 'e... �N'(/ ;.rye t' F4•).' '•' ,3;'y� } ` ( ° s 7 k t' I b a t' t,;-• _p i-.?..iii,,,,,.„- - -.",, .,:``L n _ _��,$7 iPy„r@�+ 511. y* ,..!•..,4;_ ,,,Ii'"s' r E f�Y=a ti'I!r F , y4,'. NM Wal 4 -'." .� .R •75:*4 RM , i itn s •'7."•';r1` ,+r COPYRIGHT©2003 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES. INC. nr =�.�soseYao,�roami�owc�rooiow< Engineering Enterprises, Inc. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WATER WORKS SYSTEM DATE JANUARY 2003 Consulting Engineers KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY FROJ. N0. Y00101 FILE N0. Y0010104 � 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 630/466-9350 1 SHEET of ■ I ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 7/30/01 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. ATTACHMENT B-1 CONTRACT A.1 -NORTH ELEVATED WATER STORAGE TANK WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL e:' a t, 3 ENGINEERING , ; DRAFTING " ,-SURVEYING'- '"ADI N. ,..WORK ;< , , WORK SENIOR SENIOR . SENIOR SENIOR" ' , ITEM COST ITEM '. PRINCIPAL PROJECT PROJECT .PROJECTPROJECT CAD PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT SENIOR PROJECT ," , HOUR PER' NO,,,, WORK'TEA ... ENGINEER MANAGER MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER MANAGER TECHN. TECHN., SURVEYOR 'SURVEYOR TECHN., ` SECRET' ';SUMMARY' ITEM Jr 100 Project Meetings 12 16 20 20 , 68 $6,204 200 Surveying 8 12 8 8 16 16 16 16 100 $8,052 300 Design Calculations 8 12 50 50 120 $10,314 400 Construction Drawings 4 8 50 40 8 40 40 190 $15,342 500 Technical Specifications 4 12 24 32 24 96 $7,416 600 Front End Documents 4 2 8 8 12 34 $2,580 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 2 2 6 8 6 24 $1,872 800 Permitting 2 6 12 12 6 38 $3,090 900 Bidding 2 8 12 12 6 I 40 $3,282 MAN-HOUR TOTAL' 38 0 74 194 190 16 56 40 16 16 16 54 710 $58,152 FEE EI)tJLE:45OF.01/Oiit>1 yp� ,.... .. ,_. .:� ...... �.�. .. ... .�.ea d.�_, �. •;,,e*.. .1`fi;? .., __:.:„ �' =' � ;1„��I�E4'lACO$TS....*:,.:,--,;.,"*...*44. ,yR,` Principal Engineer E-3 38 hours @ $114 per hour= $4,332 Printing $1,000 Senior Project Manager E-2 0 hours $105 per hour= $0 Supplies&Misc. Project Manager E-1 74 hours © $96 per hour= $7,104 Computer Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 210 hours @ $87 per hour= $18,270 Transportation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 190 hours @ $78 per hour= $14,820 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 16 hours � $69 per hour= $1,104 DIRECT EXPENSES= $1,000 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 hours @ $60 per hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours $51 � per hour= CAD Manager E-1 16 hours @ $96 per hour= $1,536 Engineering Expenses= $43,134 Senior Project Technician T-5 56 hours @ $78 per hour= $4,368 Drafting Expenses= $8,664 Project Technician T-4 56 hours @ $69 per hour= $3,864 Surveying Expenses= $3,600 Senior Technician T-3 hours © $60 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $2,754 Technician T-2 hours @ $51 per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $58,152 Associate Technician T-1 hours Secretary A-3 54 hours @ $42 per hour= @ $51 per hour= $2,754 HOURLY TOTAL= 710 TOTAL LABOR= $58,152 TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= I $59,152 GIPUBLIC\Yorkville12001\YO0101 Water Works Projects ProposaliEnp\(fee inventory-AMENDED CE.xislA.1-N Tank ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 7/30/01 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE, IL. ATTACHMENT B-2 CONTRACT A.2 - RT.47 FINISHED WATER MAIN AND BP/PRV STATION WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL c ROEE .S.; "" RT : , ORRK Y .. k %„SURVEYING ” I„' r at GRAFTING `t* d ri : I1EM, cf .. z " ' SENIOR cPC z OTPROJECT :WORK z ti i` FALPSRENOJIEORTEGRER AECGPJEC ` ROETCAtlD ''''''''''''''''''''''46-11!V'''''7'' PSITECNJIEOCR. TECHNPUSNJOXCROx"r- UREVNIEYRORPTERQJCNENCTS3-1E-S. .SUO6U- R, $6IGEEM4 ,TEM ;; ��' I,,: ENGINEER MANAGER MANAGERENGINEER ENGINEER= WORKTEM-. 100 Project Meetings 12 16 20 20 200 Surveying 8 16 24 8 16 8 40 40 40 200 $15,600 300 Design Calculations 0 $0 400 Construction Drawings 6 20 60 60 16 80 80 322 $25,800 500 Technical Specifications 4 8 32 32 6 82 $6,810 600 Front End Documents 4 4 24 24 8 64 $5,208 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 2 4 8 8 2 24 $2,034 800 Permitting 2 6 12 12 4 36 $2,988 900 Bidding 2 8 12 12 8 42 $3,384 MAN-HOURR TOTAL: 32 0 74 184 192 24 96 88 40 40 40 28 838 $68,028 E S kIEDiJLi 1=fil folio 41,�.�'? ..W .,,�,�.'_ _,-,,,,,,-i-`: .^ .,..r.�.� i.... .E.., ,�..� , .,.,� ... �, R''t'rr z' ,� '•�,ds ,f' -:i, a ." rx ,,',.� e� rem :-. Principal Engineer E-3 32 hours @ $114 per hour $3,648 Printin• $1,000 Senior Project Manager E-2 0 hours @ $105 per hour= $0 Su..lies&Misc. Project Manager E-1 74 hours @ $96 per hour= $7,104 Com.uter Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 224 hours @ $87 per hour= $19,488 Trans.ortation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 192 hours @ $78 per hour= $14,976 - error Engineer/Surveyor P-3 40 hours @ $69 hour= $2,760 DIRECT EXPENSES= $1,000 Engineer/Surveyor @ $51 per hour= P-1 hours P-2 hours Associate Engineer/Surveyor @ $60 perper hour= CAD Manager E-1 24 hours @ $96 per hour= $2,304 Engineering Expenses= $41,736 Senior Project Technician T-5 96 hours @ $78 per hour= $7,488 Drafting Expenses= $15,864 Project Technician T-4 128 hours @ $69 per hour= $8,832 Surveying Expenses= $9,000 Senior Technician T-3 hours @ $60 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $1,428 Technician T-2 hours @ $51 per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $68,028 Associate Technician T-1 hours @ $42 per hour= Secretary A-3 28 hours @ $51 per hour= $1,428 HOURLY TOTAL= 838 TOTAL LABOR= $68,028 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= $69,0281 G:\PUBLIC\Yorkville\2tK11\V00101 Water Works Projects Proposel\Enp\jfee inventory-AMENDED CE.xlsy4.2-47 WM ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE, IL. AMENDED 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-3 CONTRACT B.1 -WELLS NO. 3 AND 4 TREATMENT FACILITY WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL a`�' ' R „',ENGINEERING :, * ',DRAFTING4. ', , 'SURVEYING' 'ADMIN. y .. WORI6 SENIOR SENIOR `'SENIOR SENIOR �' ��.. . ^s''�. ;' p .�., . ` „•'', ,� � - e� �COST s ITEM y PRINCIPAL ;PROJECT,>3 :.PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT CAD t'- PROJECT_ PROJECT PROJECT SENIOR PROJECT. HOUR NO WORK ITEM . 3r PEM ` z.? ENGINEER M1(NAGER', MANAGER''ENGINEER '''ENGINEER MANAGER: TECkiN, TECHN,'' SURVEYOR:: SURVEYOR .,;TEGHN., .SECR!'f;` ',SUMMARY .,ITEM-:' ;..; 100 Project Meetings 20 20 20 20 80 $7,980 200 Surveying 8 8 8 4 40 8 8 8 92 $7,944 300 Design Calculations 10 8 40 40 98 $9,096 400 Construction Drawings 20 20 120 120 20 150 150 600 $51,570 500 Technical Specifications 20 20 80 80 12 212 $19,284 600 Front End Documents 8 8 20 20 12 68 $6,000 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 8 8 20 20 56 $5,316 800 Permitting 8 4 12 20 8 52 $4,620 900 Bidding 12 12 40 40 8 112 $10,200 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 106 0 . 108 360 368 24 190 150 8 8 8 40 1 1370 $122,010 'ali .cau .,. fii. fEE SC..HECIULCE.AS t '41191/03 ,g*:, , i4* ,A, �a * =L Principal Engineer E-3 106 hours @ $120 per hour= $12,720 Printing $3,000 Senior Project Manager E-2 0 hours @ $111 per hour= $0 Supplies&Misc. Project Manager E-1 108 hours @ $102 per hour= $11,016 Computer Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 368 hours @ $93 per hour= $34,224 Transportation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 368 hours @ $84 per hour= $30,912 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 8 hours @ $75 per hour= $600 DIRECT EXPENSES= $3,000 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 hours @ $66 per hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $57 per hour= CAD Manager 9 E-1 24 hours @ $102 per hour= $2,448 Engineering Expenses= $88,128 Senior Project Technician T-5 190 hours @ $84 per hour= $15,960 Drafting Expenses= $29,658 Project Technician T-4 158 hours @ $75 per hour= $11,850 Surveying Expenses= $1,944 Senior Technician T-3 hours @ $66 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $2,280 Technician T-2 hours @ $57 'per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $122,010 Associate Technician T-1 hours @ $48 per hour= Secretary A-3 40 hours @ $57 per hour= $2,280 HOURLY TOTAL= 1370 TOTAL LABOR= $122,010 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= $125,0101 G\PUBLIC\Yorkville\2001\Y00101 Water Works Projects Proposal\Enp\tfee inventory-AMENDED CE.xlsl8.1.3&4 TF ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-4 CONTRACT B.2-STATE STREET FINISHED WATER MAIN WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL , ,r: ENGINEERING ,v DRAFTING `'„ SURVEYIING '" ..,' DMIN WORK g WORK SENIOR- SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR f.. r ATEA! COST ITEt1! PRINCIPAL PROJECT PROJECT .,PROJECT• PROJECT- CAD PROJECT„ PROJECT.: . PROD T SENIOR PROJECT, , - „ R. PER ,' NO.”'WORK ITEM !, r' -' , ENGINEER';MANAGER 'MANAGER ENGINEER 'ENGINEER MANAGER TECHN TECHN.' SURVEYOR SURVEYOR, TECNN }SECRET `SUMMARY., , 'ITEM , .; 100 Project Meetings 4 8 10 10 32 $3,066 200 Surveying 4 8 12 4 8 4 20 20 20 100 $8,400 300 Design Calculations 0 $0 400 Construction Drawings 4 8 30 30 8 40 40 160 $13,782 500 Technical Specifications 1 4 16 16 6 43 $3,702 600 Front End Documents 1 2 12 12 8 35 $2,904 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 1 2 4 4 2 13 $1,146 800 Permitting 1 4 6 6 4 21 $1,818 900 Bidding 1 4 6 6 8 25 $2,046 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 13 0 36 92 96 12 48 44 20 20 20 28 429 $36,864 Principal Engineer E-3 13 hours @ $120 per hour= $1,560 Printing $1,000 Senior Project Manager E-2 0 hours @ $111 per hour= $0 Supplies&Misc. Project Manager E-1 36 hours @ $102 per hour= $3,672 Computer Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 112 Y hourshour @ $93 per = $10,416 Transportation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 96 hours @ $84 per hour= $8,064 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 20 hours @ $75 per hour= $1,500 DIRECT EXPENSES= $1,000 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 hours @ $66 per hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $57 per hour= CAD Manager E-1 12 hours @ $102 per hour= $1,224 Engineering Expenses= $21,852 Senior Project Technician T-5 48 hours @ $84 per hour= $4,032 Drafting Expenses= $8,556 Project Technician T-4 64 hours @ $75 per hour= $4,800 Surveying Expenses= $4,860 Senior Technician T-3 hours @ $66 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $1,596 Technician T-2 hours @ $57 per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $36,864 Associate Technician T-1 hours @ $48 per hour= Secretary A-3 28 hours @ $57 per hour= $1,596 HOURLY TOTAL= 429 TOTAL LABOR= $36,864 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= $37,8641 G:IPUBLICIYorkville120011YD0101 Water Works Projects ProposaliEnpi(fee inventory-AMENDED CE.xisjB.2-5S WM ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-5 CONTRACT B.3-WELLS NO. 3 AND 4 RAW WATER MAIN & KING ST. FINISHED W.M. WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL . ENGINEERING +`'��� {VNORlI'� Vi. ^�r GRAFTING $UItV�YING 'ACHt+IIN WORK SENIOR;. SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR ' ''ITEM COST ITEM PRINCIPAL:" e ' a ,, r s , d PROJECT PROJECT; PROJECT „PROJECT: CAA '; PROJECT PROJECT QJ1E++f.:i SENIOR PROJECT ';� M.HOGR PER NO. WORK ITEM ''' ENGINEER ;:MANAGER MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER= MANAGER TECHN.: TECHN.' `SU " URYES!OR'; SURVEYOR TECFIN. .,.SECRET`• SUMMARY ITEM �- 100 Project Meetings 16 20 24 24 84 $8,208 200 Surveying 10 20 30 12 24 12 40 65 65 278 $23,010 300 Design Calculations 0 $0 _ 400 Construction Drawings 8 40 120 120 12 100 100 500 $43,404 500 Technical Specifications 4 20 60 60 32 176 $14,964 600 Front End Documents 4 6 24 24 20 78 $6,480 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 4 6 12 12 8 42 $3,672 800 Permitting 4 10 16 16 8 54 $4,788 900 Biddin. 4 12 16 16 12 60 $5,220 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 44 0 124 292 302 24 124 112 40 65 65 80 1272 $109,746 ,. " s FEE SCHEt,ULEAS W.01/07/03 41 , Principal Engineer E-3 44 hours @ $120 per hour= $5,280 Printing $1,000 Senior Project Manager E-2 0 hours @ $111 per hour= $0 Supplies&Misc. Project Manager E-1 124 hours @ $102 per hour= $12,648 Computer Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 332 hours @ $93 per hour= $30,876 Transportation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 302 hours @ $84 per hour= $25,368 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 65 hours @ $75 per hour= $4,875 DIRECT EXPENSES= $1,000 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 hours @ $66 per hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $57 per hour= CAD Manager E-1 24 hours @ $102 per hour= $2,448 Engineering Expenses= $70,452 Senior Project Technician T-5 124 hours @ $84 per hour= $10,416 Drafting Expenses= $21,264 Project Technician T-4 177 hours @ $75 per hour= $13,275 Surveying Expenses= $13,470 Senior Technician T-3 hours @ $66 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $4,560 Technician T-2 hours @ $57 per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $109,746 Associate Technician T-1 hours @ $48 per hour= Secretary A-3 80 hours @ $57 per hour= $4,560 HOURLY TOTAL= 1272 TOTAL LABOR= $109,746 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= $110,7461 G:\PUBLIC\Yorkville\2001\Y00101 Water Works Projects Proposal\Enp\tfee inventory-AMENDED CE.xisje.3-Raw WM ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-6 CONTRACT B.4—WELL NO. 6 WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL ° ENGINEERING GRAFTING ,, 5URVEVING N' AOti(►M a WORK ' SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR _ ' SENIOR / ti " ' REM COOT ,w`- PRINCIPAL PROJECT .PROJECT PROJECT^ ,PROJECT' CAD PROJECT' ECT' <'p .,'' + k ,i,','--, "' P a: '° ' �� PROJECT' RO,�ECT SENIO�2�. ,PROJECT r 3qUp P �. , u y H FPER :i.40.2WORK ITEM.,.;, ',.?4'_=:::C,,''; ENGINEER, MANAGER: MANAGER" ENGINEER ENGINEER" MANAGER TECHN."":_ TECHN.F SURVEYOR SURVEYOR TECHN.- SECRET.',":�SUMMARY "ITEM V 100 Project Meetings 8 10 12 30 $3,096 200 Surveying 4 8 4 8 12 6 6 48 $4,248 300 Design Calculations 2 4 8 14 $1,392 400 Construction Drawings 2 12 12 4 16 16 62 $5,532 500 Technical Specifications 4 12 40 24 80 $6,792 600 Front End Documents 4 8 12 16 40 $3,324 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 2 2 6 6 16 $1,344 800 Permitting 2 4 8 6 I 20 $1,734 900 Bidding 2 8 12 8 30 $2,628 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 26 0 64 118 0 8 24 16 12 6 6 60 I 340 $30,090 0a ,4:t1;'-, }r FEE SCNE 414E:AS QFx01101/ .'` a . O 3/ Principal Engineer E-3 26 hours 1� � o �' "" � 0 @ $120 per hour= $3,120 Printing $500 Senior Project Manager E-2 0 hours @ $111 per hour= $0 Supplies&Misc. Project Manager E-1 64 hours @ $102 per hour= $6,528 Computer Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 130 hours @ $93 per hour= $12,090 Transportation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 0 hours @ $84 per hour= $0 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 6 hours @ $75 ' per hour= $450 DIRECT EXPENSES= $500 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 hours , @ $66 per hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $57 per hour= CAD Manager E-1 8 hours @ $102 per hour= $816 Engineering Expenses= $20,622 Senior Project Technician T-5 24 hours @ $84 per hour= $2,016 DraftingExpenses= $4,032 Project Technician T-4 22 hours perSurveying Expenses Senior Technician T-3 @ $75 hour= $1,650 y' g p ses= $2,016 Technicianehours @ $66 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $3,420 T-2 hours @ $57 per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $30,090 Associate Technician T-1 hours @ $48 per hour= Secretary A-3 60 hours @ $57 per hour= $3,420 HOURLY TOTAL= 340 TOTAL LABOR= $30,090 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= $30,5901 G:\PUBLIC\Yorkville\2001\Y00101 Water Works Projects Proposal\Eng1ffee inventory-AMENDED CE.xlsj8.4-Well No.8 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE, IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-7 CONTRACT B.5 -WELL NO. 6 WELL HOUSE AND TREATMENT FACILITY WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL NGiNEERING ��� '� DRAFTINGSURVEYING ADMIN. SNORKA.W < f WORK SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR .. SENIOR TELA COST ITEM za ' PRINCIPAL -;-PROJECT.,' PROJECT. .PROJECT, ',PROJECT. CAD PROJECT PROJECT' :.PROJECTS:..SENIOR PROJECT ;4 v OUR,,' NO. WORK ITEM ''' ^: , :ENGINEER MANAGER MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER MANAGER' TECHN. TECHN.' SURVEYOR SURVEYOR TECHN. SECRET ;SUMMARY ',ITEM",, '; 100 Project Meetings 20 20 20 20 80 $7,980 200 Surveying 8 8 8 4 40 8 8 8 92 $7,944 300 Design Calculations 10 12 40 40 102 $9,504 400 Construction Drawings 20 24 120 120 20 140 140 584 $50,388 500 Technical Specifications 20 24 100 _ 100 12 256 $23,232 600 Front End Documents 8 12 20 20 12 72 $6,408 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 8 12 24 24 68 $6,432 800 Permitting 8 4 12 20 8 52 $4,620 900 Bidding 12 12 40 40 8 112 $10,200 -+— MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 106 0 128 384 392 24 180 140 8 8 8 40 1418 $126,708 .: :. ::',:',1FEE,SCHEDULEAS'':QF4-iio1/03.. , ! K :- z-: pRiEctgpST5e y; ;a04 Principal Engineer E-3 106 hours @ $120 per hour= $12,720 Printing $3,000 Senior Project Manager E-2 0 hours @ $111 per hour= $0 Supplies&Misc. Project Manager E-1 128 hours @ $102 per hour= $13,056 Computer Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 392 hours @ $93 per hour= $36,456 Transportation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 392 hours @ $84 per hour= $32,928 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 8 hours @ $75 per hour= $600 DIRECT EXPENSES= $3,000 1 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 hours @ $66 per hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $57 per hour= CAD Manager E-1 24 hours @ $102 per hour= $2,448 Engineering Expenses= $94,416 Senior Project Technician T-5 180 hours @ $84 per hour= $15,120 Drafting Expenses= $28,068 Project Technician T-4 148 hours @ $75 per hour= $11,100 Surveying Expenses= $1,944 Senior Technician T-3 hours @ $66 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $2,280 Technician T-2 hours @ $57 per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $126,708 Associate Technician T-1 hours @ $48 per hour= Secretary A-3 40 hours @ $57 per hour= $2,280 HOURLY TOTAL= 1418 TOTAL LABOR= $126,708 ( TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= $129,7081 G:\PUBLIC\Yorkvifle\2001\Y00101 Water Works Projects Proposal\Enp\(fee inventory-AMENDED CE.xis]B.5-6 WHBTF ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE, IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-8 CONTRACT B.6-WELL NO. 6 LIFT STATION AND FORCE MAIN WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL .' ENGINEERING �- '`SSU •fIVORK r � DRAFTtkG > .� SURVEYING �<� .a � � SENIOR ApMI VVf) ». ..ITEM . �., °� 9 3 � � .�. r s x �N ITEM ENK)R k- SF�NtOR j SENKN2,:T a PRINCIPAL; PROJECT PROJECT-, PROJECT. "„PROJECT'. ” ''' ',GAO PROJEC'( ,PROJECT„ `�'ROJEC�eT"' SENIOR;, PROJECT %s �� NO. WORK ITEM,- s sulpi PERS ENGINEER' MANAGER, MANAGER ENGINEER ;ENGINEER„MANAGER TEGHN U .,TLCHN: StfRVEI'OR .SURVEYOR TECHN. , �8ECRET„�; SUMMARY ,"�.:' ITEM .,.:. 100 Project Meetings 8 12 16 36 $3,672 200 Surveying 4 8 4 8 12 6 6 48 $4,248 300 Design Calculations 2 4 8 14 $1,392 400 Construction Drawings 2 12 40 40 4 20 20 138 $12,132 500 Technical Specifications 4 12 30 30 24 100 $8,382 600 Front End Documents 4 8 8 8 16 li 44 $3,624 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 2 2 6 6 6 ( 22 $1,848 800 Permitting 2 4 8 8 6 ll 28 $2,406 900 Bidding 2 8 8 8 8 34 $2,928 1 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 26 0 66 132 100 8 28 20 12 6 6 60 I 464 $40,632 1: def 4: S O V , ' ” .., EE,.0„Hr—:DULE.AS OF 0144).110,3' A,x t,V :' c a'V* r 9 P Principal Engineer E-3 26 hours @ $120 per hour= $3,120 Printin Senior Project Manager E_2 0 9 $500 hours @ $111 per hour= $0 Supplies Project Manager pp t r Misc. 9 E-1 66 hours @ $102 per hour= $6,732 Computer Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 144 hours @ $93 per hour= $13,392 Transportation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 100 hours @ $84 per hour= $8,400 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 6 hours @ $75 per hour= $450 DIRECT EXPENSES= $500 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 hours @ $66 per hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $57 per hour= CAD Manager E-1 8 hours @ $102 per hour= $816 Engineering Expenses= $$4,668Senior Project Technician T_5 hours @ $84 per hour= $2,352 Project Technician T-4 26 hours @ $75 per hour= $1,950 Drafting Expenses= $2,016 Senior Technician T-3 Surveying Expenses= $2,016 Sehnician hours @ $66 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $3,420 T-2 hours @ $57 per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $40,632 Associate Technician T-1 hours @ $48 per hour= Secretary A-3 60 hours @ $57 per hour= $3,420 HOURLY TOTAL= 464 TOTAL LABOR= $40,632 1 TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= $41,1321 G:\PUBLIC\Yorkville\2001\Y00101 Water Works Projects Proposal\Eng\fee inventory-AMENDED CE.xls]8.8-8 LS&FM ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-9 CONTRACT C.1 -SOUTH WATER STORAGE TANK WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL ENGINEERING' DRAfTiNG r SURVEYING ADMIN. WORK :: WORK SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR ''..SENIOR t ;' COST ITEM!'' aoa,i • \ `�• PRINCIPAL 'PROJECT .;PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT CAD 'PROJECT PROJECT-„PROJ S ‘• —•.:;:'-‘—'-:',,':, Ewa ��SENIOR; PROJECT •;,,;;"4,-,,,11-, EJR PER: NO. WORK ITEM ,: .. ,. iC rx • ` .. :ENGtNEP.R;.•MANAGER MANAGER ,ENGINEER ENGINEER MANAGER TECHN. T$GNN.' SURVEYOR' SURVEYOR ..'tECiIN. ,SECR ,,,, SUMMARY iTEMt 100 Project Meetings 16 32 40 40 128 $12,264 200 Surveying 8 12 8 8 16 16 16 16 ( 100 $8,652 300 Design Calculations 8 12 60 60 140 $12,804 400 Construction Drawings 4 8 60 60 8 40 40 220 $19,092 500 Technical Specifications 4 12 32 32 24 104 $8,736 600 Front End Documents 4 2 8 8 12 34 $2,784 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 2 2 6 8 6 24 $2,016 800 Permitting 2 6 12 12 6 38 $3,318 900 Bidding 2 8 12 12 6 40 $3,522 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 42 0 90 242 240 16 56 40 16 16 16 54 828 $73,188 , i• ''EE;SCNEDULEAS,DF011, 1,03 • • RAP $ Principal Engineer E-3 42 hours @ $120 per hour $5,040 Printing $1,000 Senior Project Manager E-2 0 hours @ $111 per hour= $0 Supplies&Misc. Project Manager E-1 90 hours @ $102 per hour= $9,180 Computer Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 258 hours @ $93 per hour= $23,994 Transportation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 240 hours @ $84 per hour= $20,160 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 16 hours @ $75 per hour= $1,200 DIRECT EXPENSES= $1,000 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 hours @ $66 per hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $57 per hour= CAD Manager E-1 16 hours @ $102 per hour= $1,632 Engineering Expenses= $56,886 Senior Project Technician T-5 56 hours @ $84 per hour= $4,704 Drafting Expenses= $9,336 Project Technician T-4 56 hours @ $75 per hour= $4,200 Surveying Expenses= $3,888 Senior Technician T-3 hours @ $66 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $3,078 Technician T-2 hours @ $57 per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $73,188 Associate Technician T-1 hours @ $48 per hour= Secretary A-3 54 hours @ $57 per hour= $3,078 HOURLY TOTAL= 828 TOTAL LABOR= $73,188 ( TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= $74,1881 G:1PUBIIC\Yorkville\2001\Y00101 Water Works Projects Proposal\Eng\Ifee inventory-AMENDED CE.xisjC.1-S Tank ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE, IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-10 CONTRACT C.2-MILL AND VAN EMMON STREET FINISHED WATER MAIN WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL c ,: '' ENGINEERING DRAFTING' '�`_' SURVEYING,. ADMIN WO ¢ WORK t'` SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR `i ITEM PRENCIPAL' ` PROJECT PROJECT;: 'PROJECT --'PROJECT, CAD'' PROJECT PROJECT; ,PROJECT;< , SENIOR- 'PROJECT . t HOUR< "pER, NO WORK ITEM ,;' 't ENGINEER; MANAGER MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER MANAGER TECHN.`' TECHN SURVEYOR: .SURVEYOR TECHN. `:''SECRET,":: SUMMARY ,` `ITEM 100 Project Meetings 4 12 16 16 48 $4,536 200 Surveying 4 8 12 4 8 4 20 20 20 100 $8,400 300 Design Calculations 0 $0 400 Construction Drawings 4 12 60 60 8 60 60 264 $22,680 500 Technical Specifications 1 4 30 30 6 71 $6,180 600 Front End Documents 1 2 12 12 8 , 35 $2,904 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 1 2 12 12 2 29 $2,562 800 Permitting 1 4 8 8 4 25 $2,172 900 Bidding 1 4 10 10 8 , 33 $2,754 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 13 0 44 156 160 12 68 64 20 20 20 28 605 $52,188 46.. n,. .. it , -Z ,,. . . '. J!eE SCHEDULE:-AS OF;01/O1703 M f 0 4"4_... y+3 V c«., , .,. ,. " "; fr. ; ,DIREGTVST i V Principal Engineer E-3 13 hours @ $120 per hour= $1,560 Printing $1,000 Senior Project Manager E-2 0 hours @ $111 per hour= $0 Supplies&Misc. Project Manager E-1 44 hours @ $102 per hour= $4,488 Computer Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 176 hours @ $93 per hour= $16,368 Transportation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 160 hours @ $84 per hour= $13,440 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 20 hours @ $75 per hour= $1,500 DIRECT EXPENSES= $1,000 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 hours @ $66 per hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $57 per hour= CAD Manager E-1 12 hours @ $102 per hour= $1,224 Engineering Expenses= $33,996 Senior Project Technician 1-5 68 hours @ $84 per hour= $5,712 Drafting Expenses= $11,736 Project Technician T-4 84 hours @ $75 per hour= $6,300 Surveying Expenses= $4,860 Senior Technician T-3 hours @ $66 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $1,596 Technician T-2 hours @ $57 per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $52,188 Associate Technician T-1 hours @ $48 per hour= Secretary A-3 28 hours @ $57 per hour= $1,596 HOURLY TOTAL= 605 TOTAL LABOR= $52,188 ( TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= $53,1881 G:\PUBLIC\Yorkville\2001\Y00101 Water Works Projects Proposal\Engi fee inventory-AMENDED CE.xls1C.2-Mill WM ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE, IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-11 CONTRACT C.3 -LIBERTY STREET FINISHED WATER MAIN WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL ENGINEERING `' ? DRAFTING ? SUI VEYING M1N. a IMO WORK ° x � t r 4i SENIOR SEMPR SENIOR z SENIOR r: 1 ,iz�t ft a t i r :r AT , ,,,,P..414' PRINCIPAL' :PROJECT "PRO TECT-: PROJECT ,PROJECT.. . .CADPROJECT PROJECT ,''PROJECT;; SENIOR 'PROJECT i,€ HOU PER ,':•'00.'4 WORK ITEM •"' ''.'''''''.''''':,;n4-:' '"ENGINEER: 'MANAGER ;,MANAGER' ENGINEER ENGINEER MANAGER -TECHN. ''TECHN.,., 'SURVEYOR',SURVEYOR ,;TECHN. ;;SECRET:;; SUMMARY ;''ITEM.e 100 Project Meetings 4 6 8 8 26 $2,508 200 Surveying 4 8 8 4 8 4 20 20 20 96 $8,064 300 Design Calculations 0 $0 400 Construction Drawings 4 8 30 30 8 40 40 160 $13,782 500 Technical Specifications 1 4 16 16 6 43 $3,702 600 Front End Documents 1 2 12 12 8 35 $2,904 r 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 1 2 4 4 2 13 $1,146 800 Permitting 1 4 6 6 4 21 $1,818 900 Bidding 1 4 6 6 8 25 $2,046 ' MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 13 0 34 90 90 12 48 44 20 20 20 28 419 $35,970 : .. ni. , :r FEE SGMEDt14 AS,0E-.01/0!/i13'. '. A .d? ' y. l x OIEE I~GtOSTS, f< Principal Engineer E-3 13 hours @ $120 per hour= $1,560 Printing $1,000 Senior Project Manager E-2 0 hours @ $111 per hour= $0 Supplies&Misc. Project Manager E-1 34 hours @ $102 per hour= $3,468 Computer Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 110 hours @ $93 per hour= $10,230 Transportation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 90 hours @ $84 per hour= $7,560 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 20 hours @ $75 per hour= $1,500 DIRECT EXPENSES= $1,000 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 hours @ $66 per hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $57 per hour= CAD Manager E-1 12 hours @ $102 per hour= $1,224 Engineering Expenses= $20,958 Senior Project Technician T-5 48 hours @ $84 per hour= $4,032 Drafting Expenses= $8,556 Project Technician T-4 64 hours @ $75 per hour= $4,800 Surveying Expenses= $4,860 Senior Technician T-3 hours @ $66 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $1,596 Technician T-2 hours @ $57 per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $35,970 Associate Technician T-1 hours @ $48 per hour= Secretary A-3 28 hours @ $57 per hour= $1,596 HOURLY TOTAL= 419 TOTAL LABOR= $35,970 TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= $36,970 G:\PUBLIC\Yorkville\2001\YO0101 Water Works Projects Proposal\Engijtee inventory-AMENDED CE.xisJC.3-Liberty WM • . ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE, IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-12 CONTRACT C.4-SOUTH BP/PRV STATION WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL WORKENGINEERING DRAFTING SURVEYING ADMIN. WORK ENIOR SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR - ITEM COST ITE - :'::, :- ,;• : ss:•'•:,‘ •'-- ,,,,'! :-- PRINcT1, PROJECT PROJECT'PNOJECT. PROJECT ,PROJECT ' 'CAD' PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT .i`SENIOR( PROJECT' ','":1,'':-,'- ',,,', .-*-0Olfil:; '; PERuCh,;,',, NO.' WORK ITEM ':' '' '---'' 'W •'' '-',"1 ENGINEER MANAGER MANAGER ENGINEER 'ENGINEER MANAGER TECHN; TEcHN:,, SURVEYOR SURVEYOR' TECHN., ;SECRET.`, SUMMARY ' ITEM 100 Project Meetings 4 6 8 8 26 $2,508 200 Surveying 4 8 8 4 8 4 4 8 8 56 $4,776 300 Design Calculations . 0 $0 400 Construction Drawings 4 8 30 30 8 40 40 160 $13,782 500 Technical Specifications 1 4 20 20 6 51 $4,410 600 Front End Documents 1 2 12 12 8 35 $2,904 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 1 . 2 4 4 , 2 13 $1,146 800 Permitting 1 4 6 6 , 4 21 $1,818 900 Bidding 1 . 4 6 6 8 25 $2,046 ' MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 13 0 34 94 94 12 48 44 4 8 8 28 387 $33,390 ',''''.,'' ''''''',,-"-If'.., `'•::''",:;-"c'''•.4,.. ,...i•i,4,'--;i"!:0-‘ "'',':,-, FEE SCHEDULE AS OF 01/01103 ',-4..,q`iiki.-.,,:,,9,-•,-,!:-;"--',—,-•-•','2'#in,Y4-- --''''-', •',--- • , • ,%-*--fozoPiligcr,-pcwsi :-,,,,,,,,,f,Ar.c*.,,,014 Principal Engineer E-3 13 hours @ $120 per hour= $1,560 Printing $1,000 Senior Project Manager E-2 0 hours @ $111 per hour= $0 Supplies&Misc. Project Manager E-1 34 hours @ $102 per hour= $3,468 Computer Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 98 hours @ $93 _per hour= $9,114 Transportation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 94 hours @ $84 per hour= $7,896 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 8 hours @ $75 per hour= $600 DIRECT EXPENSES= $1,000 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 hours @ $66 per hour= , Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $57 per hour= CAD Manager E-1 12 hours @ $102 per hour= $1,224 Engineering Expenses= $21,666 Senior Project Technician T-5 48 hours @ $84 per hour= $4,032 Drafting Expenses= $8,556 Project Technician T-4 52 hours @ $75 per hour= $3,900 Surveying Expenses= $1,572 Senior Technician T-3 hours @ $66 per hour=, Administrative Expenses= $1,596 Technician T-2 hours @ $57 per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $33,390 Associate Technician T-1 hours @ $48 per hour= Secretary A-3 28 hours @ $57 per hour= $1,596 HOURLY TOTAL= 387 TOTAL LABOR= $33,390 TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= $34,390 G•NPUBLIC\Yorkville\2001\Y00101 Water Works Projects Proposal Enci\jfee inventory-AMENDED CE,xls]C.4-south BP-PRV ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE, IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-13 CONTRACT C.5 -SOUTH PRV STATION WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL ' M ENGINEERING DRAFTING ' SURVEYING ADMIN WORK WORK SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR , xk ITEM COST jTEM ,, PRINCIPAL; PROJECT PROJECT `PROJECT ..PROJECT GAO:, PROJECT. PROJECT.. :PROJECT,' ,SENIOR PROJECT ,:-...- "4,.,4, , 1OUR PER NO WORK ITEM `, ;. "ENGINEER; MANAGER MANAGER ENGINEER -'ENGINEER MANAGER TEGHN. TECHN.' SURVEYOf ,SURVEYOR TECHN. :SECRET, *SUMMARY ITEM'✓', 100 Project Meetings 1 2 2 2 7 $678 r 200 Surveying 2 2 2 1 2 2 4 8 8 31 $2,550 300 Design Calculations 0 $0 400 Construction Drawings 1 2 10 10 2 10 10 45 $3,888 500 Technical Specifications 1 2 8 8 2 21 $1,854 600 Front End Documents 1 1 2 2 2 8 $690 - 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 1 1 2 2 6 $576 800 Permitting 1 1 2 2 2 8 $690 900 Bidding 1 1 4 4 2 12 $1,044 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 7 0 12 32 32 3 12 12 4 8 8 8 138 $11,970 -,,,,,,,,, ,'.44,4,9,-;;;,. FEE SCHEDULE AS:OF 01/01/03 -,,,":1-T41,.,‘, .'•, ".s,',4" ,...: >"'_: `fk 1,0filE?C+T OOS ., `"r,,A'° Principal Engineer E-3 7 hours @ $120 per hour= $840 Printing $1,000 Senior Project Manager E-2 0 hours @ $111 per hour= $0 Supplies&Misc. Project Manager E-1 12 hours @ $102 per hour= $1,224 Computer Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 36 hours @ $93 per hour= $3,348 Transportation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 32 hours @ $84 per hour= $2,688 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 8 hours @ $75 per hour= $600 DIRECT EXPENSES= $1,000 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 hours @ $66 per hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $57 per hour= CAD Manager E-1 3 hours @ $102 per hour= $306 Engineering Expenses= $7,728 Senior Project Technician T-5 12 hours @ $84 per hour= $1,008 Drafting Expenses= $2,214 Project Technician T-4 20 hours @ $75 per hour= $1,500 Surveying Expenses= $1,572 Senior Technician T-3 hours @ $66 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $456 Technician T-2 hours @ $57 per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $11,970 Associate Technician T-1 hours @ $48 per hour= Secretary A-3 8 hours @ $57 per hour= $456 HOURLY TOTAL= 138 TOTAL LABOR= $11,970 TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= $12,970 G.\PUBLICworkville\2001\Y00101 Water Works Projects Proposal\Enp\jfee inventory-AMENDED CE Asp 5-South PRV ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE, IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-14 CONTRACT C.6 -WELL NO. 7 WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL ,',-::•,', ':-,X.'•-•:,:r.-'''',',`:v' '' 4,"<,'-'; 'sitV...',:'; ',,,- '"-•''.,'',,'-----‘':,-,,t-' ENGINEERING,..' , "'`„---'-'n' ; • '" ,,''''," DRAFTING' -''';,';"'" : i'--"',;'9V4:,URVEYING. '` t"' ",7",'AOMIN:,, -;,SWORO WORK Se ' •:;', , ', ,'.-":''',?;' 2'igt 1,i.?: •-, ,' ,,SENIOR ‘,',. ,, L ', '-•,SENIOR ,' '''''," ',`".- ' , SENIOR, , • SENIOR ITEM''',"-,!',, i , . : '.f.f"7"-;---:,/,„,,i;i ';!:,,,ATK.;, ,,,..,0sr,/g. Rem ,— ,'', --;;...:,, ,c..---,,:':. is4,-7-1;,,.;',.:-.,,,, PRINCIPAL ,,PROJECT; ,pROJECT, PROJECT ,PROJECT CAD,..-,--: pgfaJEcT, ,PROJECT PROJECT SENIOR . PROJECT ,fititr,,,' „;V:1190 ,. ,' 44",..gkil,:, NO. , WORK ITEM"—"‘:""'";;".,43:''1-,-,f,"'-,';'',V;',' ENGINEER MANAGER MANAGER' ENGINEER ENGINEER MANAGER TECHN. ' TECHN.:,' SURVEYOR SURVEYOR TECHN., ,":;;SECRET: SUMMARY ;;'1:5EM 100 Project Meetings 8 10 12 30 $3,096 200 Surveying 4 8 4 8 12 6 6 48 $4,248 300 Design Calculations 2 4 8 14 $1,392 400 Construction Drawings 2 12 12 _ 4 16 16 62 $5,532 500 Technical Specifications 4 12 40 24 80 $6,792 600 Front End Documents 4 8 12 16 40 $3,324 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 2 2 6 , 6 16 $1,344 800 Permitting 2 4 8 , 6 20 $1,734 900 Bidding 2 8 12 8 30 $2,628 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 26 0 64 118 0 8 24 16 12 6 6 60 340 $30,090 fge.-skieoPLE AS ORItioi/03,,,,,, ,too,6,--ifi-***43-0*Tiwt.$4, ,.,..?;-nfDIREct,PS Principal Engineer E-3 26 hours @ $120 per hour= $3,120 Printin• $500 Senior Project Manager E-2 0 hours @ $111 per hour= $0 Su••lies&Misc. Project Manager ' E-1 64 hours @ $102 per hour= $6,528 Com•uter Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 130 hours @ $93 per hour= $12,090 Trans.ortation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 0 hours @ $84 per hour= $0 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 6 hours @ $75 per hour= $450 DIRECT EXPENSES= .11:01 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 hours @ $66 per hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $57 per hour= CAD Manager E-1 8 hours @ $102 per hour= $816 Engineering Expenses= $20,622 Senior Project Technician T-5 24 hours @ $84 per hour= $2,016 Drafting Expenses= $4,032 Project Technician T-4 22 hours @ $75 per hour= $1,650 Surveying Expenses= $2,016 ... Senior Technician , T-3 hours @ $66 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $3,420 Technician T-2 hours @ $57 per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $30,090 Associate Technician T-1 hours @ $48 per hour= Secretary A-3 60 hours @ $57 per hour= $3,420 HOURLY TOTAL= 340 TOTAL LABOR= $30,090 TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= $30,590 a NPUBLICWorkvilleV001W00101 Water Works Projects Proposat\Englfee inventory-AMENDED CE.xlsp.8-Well No.7 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE, IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-15 CONTRACT C.7 -WELL NO.7 WELL HOUSE AND TREATMENT FACILITY WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL ,, 1«c TIN 2 �� .�, 2 `����,'� ENGINEERING �.,�"� i ''DRAFTING° �'� > SURVEYING '� � � k�� . WORK s SENIOR SENIOR "! SENIOR SENIOR ,. ' ITEM S COST L, I � ' HOUR/6:-. r PER :ITEM' "`". ,> � �; '. � PRINCIPAL PROJECT PROJECT =PROJECT.. PROJECT CAD PROJECT; PROJECT': PROJECT, SENIOR. PROJECT r jNO,� WORK ITEM;` ... ; �,.;...,: ENGINEER=''MANA(3Et2 MANAGER ENGINEER ;'ENGINEER MANAGER TECHN. `TECHN.' SURVEYOR; SURVEYOR - TECHN. "°$EGRET':' SUMMARY" 'ri:FTEM 100 Project Meetings 20 20 20 20 80 $7,980 200 Surveying 8 8 8 4 40 8 8 8 92 $7,944 300 Design Calculations 10 12 40 40 102 $9,504 400 Construction Drawings 20 24 120 120 20 140 140 584 $50,388 500 Technical Specifications 20 s 24 100 100 12 256 $23,232 600 Front End Documents 8 12 20 20 12 72 $6,408 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 8 12 24 24 68 $6,432 800 Permitting 8 4 12 20 8 52 $4,620 900 Bidding 12 12 40 40 8 112 $10,200 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 106 0 128 384 392 24 180 140 8 8 8 40 I 1418 $126,708 1=EE FIEDULE-11S Q,F.'01l01103 ' �s;,.i..4�;. . ,WM.-,,,,,,..:)q,,.;:,,--,:':‘,',:' ',,'',i,., Principal Engineer E-3 106 hours $120 per hour= $12,720 Printing $3,000 Senior Project Manager E-2 0 hours slot $111 per hour= $0 Supplies&Misc. Project Manager E-1 128 hours @ $102 per hour= $13,056 Computer Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 392 hours @ $93 per hour= $36,456 Transportation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 392 hours @ $84 per hour= $32,928 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 8 hours @ $75 per hour= $600 DIRECT EXPENSES= $3,000 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 hours @ $66 per hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours _ @ $57 per hour= CAD Manager E-1 24 hours @ $102 per hour= $2,448 Engineering Expenses= $94,416 Senior Project Technician T-5 180 hours @ $84 per hour= $15,120 Drafting Expenses= $28,068 Project Technician T-4 148 hours @ $75 per hour= $11,100 Surveying Expenses= $1,944 Senior Technician T-3 hours @ $66 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $2,280 Technician T-2 hours @ $57 per hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $126,708 Associate Technician T-1 hours @ $48 per hour= Secretary A-3 40 hours @ $57 per hour= $2,280 HOURLY TOTAL= 1418 TOTAL LABOR= $126,708 1 TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= $129,7081 G:\PUBLICWorkville\2001\Y00101 Water Works Projects Proposal\Enp\jfee inventory.AMENDED CE.xls]C.7-7 WH&TF ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-16 CONTRACT D.1 -SCADA SYSTEM INTEGRATION WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL " • NGINEERING" DRAFTING -:,-,::::,::-;', 'SURVEYING ADMIN. '"°WORK WORK � ..: . . SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR a SENIOR :. . - ;`,„:,:::1.7"1:;'.,-,,, COST ITEM > PRtNCIpA�. PROJECT PROJECT; PROJECT- 'PROJECT, GAD; PROJECT.• PROJEC'Y' ,;PROJECT;:; SENIOR PRWECT ,�• HOUIt,� PER �; NO. WORK ITEM , ..::'''.4:::::',; :, ENGINEER: MANAGER MANAGER ENGINEERS ';ENGINEER. MANAGER TECHN.., TECHN. SURVEYOR SURVEYOR TECHN. ;,SECRET.; ATTACHMENT A: SCHEDULE -WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 7/30/01 AMENDED 3/25/02 United City of Yorkville, Kendall Co., IL AMENDED 1/21/03 Contr. 2002 2003 2004 2005 No. Project Work Items p© 0© D Q©©Q©000© 0© D Q©©Q©000© 0© D OQ©Q©Q -- Project Plan Project Plan Revision EMI=MMIMMIIIIIIMMIII EMINIMIMMEIMIll 11111111.1111111 Env.Sign-offs Resubmittal1111■...�e....11......11.1111............ (Under Separate Env. Sign-offs Review .111111.. i _111111111111.11..1111111111.11111111..11111111. Contract-For Project Plan Review-TEPA 11111111111 f I ....11.11..11..11............. Reference P.E.I.D.-IEPA ......11111 111111.111111..1111..111111111111..111111.. Purposes Only) Public Hearing ..11..11.1111.11..111111..............1111... Project Plan Acceptance 11111111.111111..1 111111111111111111111111111111111111•••I•• A.1 North Elevated Water Site Acquisition Consult. 11111111111111111111111111111111....1111........11111111. Storage Tank Design 11..11....11..11..1111.11..11..11.1111...1111111111 =--IEPA Plan Review 11......111111...111111.....1111111111.11....... Bidding and Contracting 111111.......11................111111.. Construction 11.. 11..111111...11111111..111111.. A.2 Route 47 Finished Design 11111111..11111111.....1111111111...1111111111111111111111. Water Main&BP/PRV IEPA Plan Review 1111......111111....11...1111111111........... Station Finalize Easements .....I I 111111...111111111111...1111.11111111111111111111 Bidding and Contracting 1111 .. 11..1111 .11111111..11E... Construction 11.11..11....11. 1111111111. ... 11111111.11.....111111.1111111111 B.1 Wells No.3 and 4 Design Mum orrrx.m.runsimsommuniom mum Treatment Facility IEPA Plan Review 11.......11..', I 11..11.11...11........... Bidding and Contracting 11.....1111.11...11 1111............... Construction .................. ....... B.2 State Street Finished Design 11.11111111-'{ 7 NN 111111111111.111111111111...11.11.. . =Water Main IEPA Plan Review .. .11...... I I 11111111....111111.11111111111111.11 Bidding and Contracting .....11.......11 .11111111.........1111. Construction 11.....11.11...1111...MI.. ...11111111. 6.3 Wells No. 3 and 4 Raw Design .( i[ ��ry( "�JI r__l 7 ,L 11.11111111.111111.111111111111..11.... Water Main&King IEPA Plan Review 11...11...111111, 1 'I ....111111111111...11..11111111. Street Water Main Bidding and Contracting 111111111111111111..... .1111.111111111111....... Construction U...1111.11F11r.11.1111.111111111111 .11111111111111 B.4 Well No.6 Design 11••1111111AmEr7,rAmpu11111111111111111111NEEN mum IEPA Plan Review .....111111.1111 .r UNI 11111111111111.....MEM. Bidding and Contracting .....111111111111.1111 ........11.11..11111111 Construction 111111..1111....111111.... .......111111...11 B.5 Well No.6 Well House Design 1111..11• r [ ' L..l.J..1111..........1111....11 and Treatment Facility IEPA Plan Review 111111...1111... [ LE...111111111111.1111...1111111111 Bidding and Contracting 11...11111111...... ................. Construction 11........1111.....1111..11 ..1111. B.6 Well No.6 WH and TF Design .....11..L; .......11..11...1111..11..... Lift Station and IEPA Plan Review ...........1 f I 11111111111111111.1111111.11.111111111111 Forcemain Bidding and Contracting 11111111..111111..111111 ...........1111111111. Construction MEM............I.. . ..11 .. . 11.1111 -- IEPA Loan Documen- Loan Application Prep. 1111111111111111E L 1111111111111111.....11111111...11.11. tation i - I-I S • Millrff,AIMMIIIIMOunimmunmuno Resolutions IIeIII11 U■■■■! I IUUU U■■■11■■■11I■■=MIME Debt Authorization Ord. .11111111.1111111111'1 T ■.11..11........11....... Public Comment 1.U1111l I•UUUUIIL_:INE 11111...1111111111111111 NUMMI Water Use Ordinance Rev. mum.is....L..11..1111....1111.......= _ 11 Application Complete .11.....111111....1'' _ ..........11....... Loan Agreement Issued EMMENM11111111111111111111j_f.■■■11■11■11■11■■1111■■■ C.1 South Water Storage Predesign Report 11...1111.1111 ...1111.....11111111....11.111111111111 Tank Design I....UU f..-simsIUI I...000.U......U.. IEPA Plan Review .111111.....: I 11......1111........1111....11 Bidding and Contracting ....111111011 .....1111........111111...11 Construction ..11...f11..11..11 .11.111111.1111 C.2 Mill and Van Emmon Design .N I I ; L�_ILLIUII111111111111■■U■111111■■■■■11111111■11 Finished Water Main IEPA Plan Review ...11..11j 1 111111.1111...11....1111111111.....11. Bidding and Contracting 11111111..... .1111....111111..........11... Construction MM.■ ■11N NM 111.11111111...11...111.11111111...11...11111111 C.3 Liberty Street Finished Design 11L fl ■■�'L111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111NEM = Water IEPA Plan Review .111111..E I 1111....M11111111.........■■■1111■ Bidding and Contracting 111111111. . 1111111111..1111.......1111 NENE.. Construction 111111111111111111111111 11111111...111111111111.1111111111. C.4 South BP/PRV Station Design 11111 1111111ILIEMEMMIIIIIIIIIM............11....11 IEPA Plan Review 111111.... I_ 1 11..111111=.1111............... Bidding and Contracting 11111111.... 1111111111. .111111............11 Construction 1111111111.11111111 El 111.11111111EINNIMINEI 11111111111. C.5 South PRV Station Design 111111.L F IIIIIEMEMIIEM MEMIIIIME1101111111 MENEM Bidding and Contracting 1111MIIMIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIMM -11-11-11'.11. 1111111..11111111....11..1111.1111 Construction .111111..lUll 11111111..111111 1111111111..111111 C.6 Well No.7 Design 1111111111111..AMMEI1111111111 11■111111■■■■■■■■■■11■ IEPA Plan Review 11111111 Ell j I 1111U111111I■■■■■■11■■■■■MENEM Bidding and Contracting rims 111E1 111111..11.111111....0.1111111111 Construction 1111111111111 11111111............... C.7 Well No.7 Well House Design METE f € . 1 Pl11..11111111111111.....11111111NEE= and Treatment Facility IEPA Plan Review ......11...1 111111.....111111..11.....11.. Bidding and Contracting 11...11.11....11. ............1111....11 Construction 11111111111111111111f1111111111 11 r 11111111111111111111. 111111 D.1 SCADA System Design 111111 ' F _'11111_�_� '1111 NE omm fl[lllUl ll.11. Integration Bidding and Contracting 11111111 .1111.... 11.1111111111 .1111111111. Construction ..1111111111111111...111111 ....11111111.... 1111 LEGEND NOTES ................. Report Work ;, IEPA Loan Application Preparation Some of the project construction schedules will be contingent L __ Design Construction on funding availability from the IEPA Public Water Supply Loan Agency Review I Site Acquisition Consultation/Easements Program(PWSLP). Bidding and Contracting Enarprlrr . ATTACHMENT B: SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 7/30/01 AMENDED 325/02 WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AMENDED 1/21/03 City of Yorkville,Kendall Co., IL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION STAKING DESIGN ENGINEERING ADMINISTR. ANL)OBSERVATION (Contract=FF) (Contract=FF) (Contract=HR) Estimated Total Total Total Total Total Total %Of Constr. Constr. Constr. Total %Of Constr. Direct Engin. Drafting Surveying Admin. Design Constr. Administration Staking&Drafting Observ. Constr. Constr. Contract Project Costs Expenses Expenses Expenses Expenses Expenses Expenses Cost Expenses Expenses Expenses Expenses Cost A.1 North Elevated Water Storage Tank $1,200,000 $1,000 $43,134 $8,664 $3,600 $2,754 $59,152 4.9% $15,300 $4,000 $13,000 $32,300 • 2.7% A.2 Rt.47 Finished W.M. &BP/PRV Station _ $897,000 $1,000. $41,736 $15,864 $9,000 $1,428 $69,028 7.7% $8,970 $13,455 $15,249 $37,674 4.2% k_ .�.,.,... - > ..�U �T. .� NTA._GT ,'� ECTS .. $ �7, .. _ ._ 4a+Y> > . rx584v .h. . � 4 528.,,._. "_$1 2...00. ., � .._.. , 2. .�6 � ,. _..+-.� Q, .. ..... ., :...:$ .,4 $ 24fl74 ,: . . � > B.1 Wells No. 3 and 4 Treatment Facility $1,644,500 $3,000 $88,128 $29,658 $1,944 $2,280 $125,010 7.6% $30,000 $6,000 $37,500 $73,500 4.5% B.2 State Street Finished Water Main $491,745 $1,000 $21,852 $8,556 $4,860 $1,596 $37,864 7.7% $6,900 $6,900 $20,600 $34,400 7.0% B.3 Wells No.3 and 4 Raw W.M.&King St. Finished W.M. $1,526,485 $1,000 $70,452 $21,264 $13,470 $4,560 $110,746 7.3% $18,300 _ $18,300 $54,900 $91,500 6.0% B.4 Well No.6 $544,500 $500 $20,622 _ $4,032 $2,016 $3,420 $30,590 5.6% $15,000 $3,000 $15,000 $33,000 6.1% B.5 Well No.6 Well House and Treatment Facility $1,705,000 $3,000 $94,416 $28,068 $1,944 $2,280 $129,708 7.6% $32,000 $7,500 $37,500 $77,000 4.5% B.6 Well No.6 W.H.and T.F. Lift Station and Forcemain $532,400 $500 $30,528 $4,668 $2,0115 $3,420 $41,132 , 7.7% $10,200 $7,500 $19,500 $37,200 7.0% 44-'a .r. _ ..._n. A .,. ,.,i. ,.z - -,-,,',' -41.$:2,-',:.., NT T .PR C '-..'$26,260.::'?: ,.. _. . ._ ...,,.,. U TOTAL +O RAC .B O.fE 44463 :. ,_, 9 0;3.. ,. 3259 96246 - ,. �. � _ :, _ _.. G TS 56, .. . . $ .$ 17 556.. .. 75 ,., 4 . ,. ,.,...... > .. . ,,. 0,.._ ,�. ..... 98. $ , ..: .. ,,$ $4 ,ti50 . �. to, $11 400 . $200:; 8 C.1 South Water Storage Tank $1,500,000 $1,000 $56,886 $9,336 $3,888 $3,078 $74,188 4.9% $19,200 _ $5,000 $16,300 $40,500 2.7% C.2 Mill and Van Emmon Street Finished Water Mains $687,450 $1,000 $33,996 $11,736 $4,860 $1,596 $53,188 7.7% $10,000 $10,000 $28,000 $48,000 7.0% C.3 Liberty Street Finished Water Main$ $478,406 $1,000 $20,958 $8,556 $4,860 $1,596 $36,970 7.7% i $6,700 $6,700 $20,100 $33,500 7.0% C.4 South BP/PRV Station $444,650 $1,000 $21,666 $8,556 $1,572 $1,596 $34,390 7.7% $5,700 $2,300 $14,500 $22,500 5.1% C.5 South PRV Station $109,150 $1,000 $7,728 $2,214 $1,572 $456 $12,970 11.9% $2,000 $1,000 $4,600 $7,600 7.0% C.6 Well No.7 $544,500 $500 $20,622 - $4,032 $2,016 $3,420 $30,590 5.6% $15,000 $3,000 $15,000 $33,000 6.1% C.7 Well No.7 Well House and Treatment Facility $1,705,000 $3,000 $94,416 $28,068 $1,944 $2,280 $129,708 7.6% $32,000 $7,500 $37,500 $77,000 4.5% • ..� . __ _ >11� c�` __ X69�. � ',,,,''-*6472':'!;!'__ 7z 498. _ - �' � � _ _. -,', 1,:4,00;0:01%.,',1 ';',.5.. _-. ;, A���N _ �� µ . <._ «..$_ `goo � $xe � , ... _ 7 , __. � _ _ � _._. _ � t)zz 2004 �� -� ... _. .. � ._ _ _ _ _ _.. ,� - .$9th .�.,. 30a � , _. ,. .. .. . , � �..�_ - D.1 `- SCADA System Integration $412,500 $13,000 $32,808 $4,974 $0 $1,824 $52,606 12.8% $20,000 $2,500 $7,500 $30,000 7:3% F .,. :�} GT ECS a ., _..,. .. ANTRA _.. $ .... . 2 . 456_. € . .._ .... __ � g�� � �p�, O , 04 __ lit'- . _ _ ._. ., . .. ._... _. ..,.._.>.... _.., - .... 4 :_,- k��. tom.. _ _ ._ .. ...,,.. .l�k�'�. �y �,. ,F.. _,� � .�.. +'' G:\PUBLIC\Yorkville\2001\YO0101 Water Works Projects Proposal\Eng\tfee inventory-AMENDED CE.xls]Summary ADDITIONAL CONSULTATION,SURVEYING,AND TESTING SERVICES Estimated Contract Service • Costs ' Type CONTRACT DESIGNATIONS Shallow Well Siting Program $35,000 HR AC=Actual Cost Easements and Legal Surveying $30,000 HR HR=Hourly Rate With Estimated Fee Federal Grant Application Consultation and Prep. $15,000 HR FF=Fixed Fee Subsurface Soils Investigation And Material Testing $50,000 - AC ,, IEPA Loan Program Documentation i $15,000 HR TOTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTATION: $145,000 - Notes: °Formerly Central City Finished Water Main-North project. I Formerly Central City Finished Wafer Main-South project. c Subsurface soils investigation and material testing costs.are estimated; Work to be completed by another company with EEI coordination ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. , SUGAR GROVE,IL 52 Wheeler Road • Sugar Grove, IL 60554 TEL: 630/466-9350 FAX: 630/466-9380 www.eeiweb.com STANDARD SCHEDULE OF CHARGES January 1, 2003 Engineering Enterprises. Inc_ EMPLOYEE DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE Principal Engineer E-3 $120.00 Senior Project Manager E-2 $111.00 Project Manager E-1 $102.00 Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 $ 93.00 Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 $ 84.00 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 $ 75.00 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 $ 66.00 Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 $ 57.00 Senior Project Technician T-5 $ 84.00 Project Technician T-4 $ 75.00 Senior Technician T-3 $ 66.00 Technician T-2 $ 57.00 Associate Technician T-1 $ 48.00 Secretary A-3 57.00 VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT AND REPROGRAPHICS Vehicle for Construction Observation VEH $ 10.00 Global Positioning System Equipment GPS $ 25.00 Scanning ($1.50 per Sheet) SCA N/A Reproduction ($1.50 per Sheet) REP N/A G:\EEI\DOCS\FORMS\GENERAL\STADS0103.DOC Consulting Engineers Specializing in Civil Engineering and Land Surveying Personnel, Positions & Classifications James K.Michels,P.E. E-3 Timothy V.Weidner,E.I. P-4 President Project Engineer Peter G.Wailers,P.E. E-3 Michele L.Daly,E.I. P-4 Senior Vice President Project Engineer David R.Burroughs,P.E. E-3 Gregory A.Chambers T-5 Vice President Senior Project Technician(Field) Ronald G.Naylor,P.E. E-2 Steven Gozner,Ill T-5 Senior Project Manager Senior Project Technician(CAD) John T.Whitehouse,P.E.,P.L.S. E-2 David S.Stewart T-5 Senior Project Manager Senior Project Technician(Field) Bradley P.Sanderson,P.E. E-1 William C.Pierson T-4 Project Manager Project Technician(CAD) Jeffrey W.Freeman,P.E. E-1 C.Larry Nolan T-4 Project Manager Project Technician(CAD) Scott A.Swanson E-1 Randall L.Long T-4 Computer Aided Drafting& Project Technician(Field) Information Systems Manager Kristopher K.Pung T-4 Timothy P.Farrell,P.E. P-5 Project Technician(CAD) Senior Project Engineer/Environmental Daniel R.Breisch T-4 George R.Burgess,P.L.S. P-5 Senior Technician(CAD) Senior Project Surveyor Ryan M.Christoffel 1-3 Jeremey T.Lay,E.I. P-5 Senior Technician(Field) Senior Project Engineer/Environmental Joshua M.Boatman T-3 Timothy N.Paulson,P.E. P-5 Senior Technician(Field) Senior Project Engineer Thomas A.Ness T-3 Kevin S.Bomstad,P.E. P-5 Senior Technician(Field) Senior Project Engineer Denise M.Migliorini A-3 Andrew R.Deitchman,P.E. P-5 Administrative Assistant Senior Project Engineer/Environmental Denise M.Thelander A-3 Mark G.Scheller,S.I. P-4 Accounting Assistant Project Surveyor Angela R.Ford A-3 Christopher E.Peterson,S.I. P-4 Secretary Project Surveyor • Dawn M.Tillman A-3 Jed R.Davis,E.I. P4 Secretary Project Engineer Nicole A.Morris A-3 Julie A.Morrison,E.I. P-4 Accounting Assistant Project Engineer Bobbi M.Erdmann A-3 Yifang Lu,E.I. P4 Marketing Director Project Engineer Angela D.McCoy A-3 Darrin P.Schertz P4 Accounting Assistant Project Engineer East Dundee.Illinois David A.Kamano,E.I. P4 Project Engineer Mark C.Weber,P.L.S. P-5 Senior Project Surveyor Brian R.Valleskey P-4 Project Hydrologist Robert C.Watts T-5 Senior Project Technician(Field) Jason M.Bauer,E.I. P-4 Project Engineer Brent D.Keil T-5 Senior Project Technician(Field) Travis A.Carroll T-3 Senior Technician(Field) LEGEND: P.E.=Professional Engineer Stacy L.Nilsen A-3 P.L.S.=Professional Land Surveyor Office Manager E.I.=Engineer Intern S.I.=Surveyor Intern E=Executive P=Professional T=Technical A=Administrative 11/25/02 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE To: Tony Graff, City Administra or From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer ._ z Subject: Fox Hill Punchlists Date: January 14, 2003 Below find the current punchlist items for all units of Fox Hill requested for acceptance by the developer. I compared the items from the most recent set of punchlists (December 2002) with the next previous set of punchlists (January 2002 for all except Unit 4. The first punchlist for Unit 4 was generated in July 2002). Items that were on the previous punchlists and either remained undone or were expanded upon in more detail in the most current punchlists are in regular type. Examples of these would be water services that need repair, missing landscaping, structures that were damaged during punchlist repair work, etc. Items shown in boldface type were listed for the first time in the December 2002 punchlists. Unit 1 Water: • The following water services need work: Lot 98 - Sleeve BB, replace 1 square walk, restore landscaping Lot 115 - Sleeve & lower BB, replace 1 square walk, restore sod(tripping hazard) • VB @ SE corner Lot 120—Plumb valve box and clean out dirt. Sanitary Sewer: • Sewers need to be televised. Submit written and video log of TV reports for review. Repair any deficiencies and re-televise as required. Storm Sewer: • All open lid structures to be cleaned of dirt, mud, PCC, and miscellaneous debris Sidewalk, Pathways, Pavement & Signage: • Pour public sidewalk across rearyard bit. Trail @ 1440 Aspen. Rem& Repl trail as necessary. Landscaping; • Landscape common areas along Route 34 and those occupied by bit. trail per plan. Miscellaneous: • The following street light foundations were found to be too shallow. Remove and replace to minimum 5-ft depth. 1)North side of Cottonwood Ct. 2)Light directly across from 1418 Aspen Ln. at entrance to trail. • Submit as-built field survey data and calculations to verify adequate detention pond volume. • Submit 2 prints of record drawings for review. After approval, submit 2 prints and Mylar original. Also submit on AutoCAD disk if possible. Unit 1 Park Site • Fill in and landscape large hole near first storm sewer outfall north of pedestrian bridge. • Several trees along the John Street frontage have died. It appears that they may have been replaced. If they leaf out OK in the spring, this item will have been satisfied. Unit 2 Watermain: • Valve#5 —Plumb & clean out dirt. • Valve #3 —Replace and plumb broken VB. Raise as necessary to meet final grading around 7' diameter storm MH at dead end of Sycamore Rd. Sanitary: • Sewers need to be televised. Submit written and video log of TV reports for review. Repair any deficiencies and re-televise as required. Storm: • Clean mud & debris from all structures. • MH 0 —Re-grade and landscape to properly drain common area along trail. • MH Nos. Q, L, K, & K3 —Remove mud & debris. • 7' dia. MH @ dead-end of Sycamore Rd. — Grade over the flat top of this structure with about 12" of topsoil so grass can grow. Remove mud & debris. • FES "N2" —Place 20+ SY riprap at base of FES. • Submit as-built field survey data and calculations to verify adequate pond volume. • Place overflow weir at pond. Repair washed-out berm. • Set 24" end section on outfall sewer per plan. • Perform landscaping of pond area. Needs a healthy stand of grass. • The outfall sewer is mostly buried. A swale needs to be excavated from the sewer pipe to lower ground. Place riprap @ outfall. Landscape area disturbed by swale excavation. Roadway: • Reimburse city for cost of installing signage. • Rem& replace broken or sunken sidewalk, or construct missing walk at following locations: 1) N. side John Street near hydrant mid-block Sycamore/Chestnut. 2) Sidewalk along east side of Sycamore Rd from Chestnut to dead-end. Miscellaneous: • The street light foundation on the north side of Sequoia Circle was found to be too shallow. Remove and replace to minimum 5-ft depth. • Run cables to provide power to the streetlights on Sycamore Road. • Landscape parkway along east side Sycamore Road south of Chestnut. • Submit 2 prints of record drawings of all improvements for review. Final record drawings to be submitted on Mylar with 2 sets of prints. Also submit CAD files if possible. Unit 3 Sanitary: • Sewers need to be televised. Submit written and video log of TV reports for review. Repair any deficiencies and re-televise as required. Water: • Repair B-Boxes identified below. 1407 Cottonwood— Top broken 1504 Stoneridge Circle—Can't key 1409 Cottonwood—Can't key 1513 Stoneridge Circle—Can't key 1411 Cottonwood—Can't key 1514 Stoneridge Circle—Can't open 1412 Cottonwood—Buried 1523 Stoneridge Ct. — Can't key 1504 Cottonwood—Buried 1525 Stoneridge Ct. —Can't key 1506 Cottonwood—Buried 1532 Stoneridge Ct. —Full of asphalt 1512 Cottonwood— Can't key 1544 Stoneridge Ct. — Can't get cap off 1518 Cottonwood—Bent, can't key 1520/1522 Cottonwood— One BB is OK, other is buried 1547 Cottonwood— Can't key Storm: • Remove sediment from all catch basins. • Submit pond detention calcs to verify adequate detention volume. Pavement & Signage and Streetlights: • Stripe parking stalls. • Replace broken luminaire lens at Cottonwood/Stoneridge Ct. • Replace streetlight foundation for pole @ 1407 Cottonwood. Set, plumb, and re-wire existing pole on new foundation. Miscellaneous: • Submit 2 prints of record drawings for review. Final record drawings to be submitted on mylar with 2 sets of prints. Also submit CAD files if possible. Unit 4 General • Need as-builts for all utilities, including benchmarks on all hydrants. The as-builts should be prepared after all adjustments listed below have been made. • Verify adequate pond volume. • For all of the items listed below that will disturb previously landscaped areas, restore the landscaping. • Get Park Board to sign off on acceptance of park areas. • Replace dead, dying, and missing trees in public and common open space areas. Sanitary • Repair and satisfactorily vacuum test Sanitary Manhole Nos. 1, 3, 6, and 9A, which have failed previous test attempts. • Remove debris from San MH No. 4. • Landscape around MH No. 2, which was raised recently. • MH on John Street Sta. 15+50R-Repair chimney seal. • Reset and seal the frame of MH No. 16. Water • Wire brush and paint all hydrants"fire hydrant red" when weather permits. • Locate and raise the following buried B-Boxes to finished grade: 1201, 1211, 1213, 1215, 1219, 1221, 1224, 1223, 1301, 1302, 1303, 1307, 1309, 1311, and 1316 Willow Way. 1206, 1216, 1218, 1314, 1316, 1318, and 1319 Evergreen. 1722, 1724, 1726, 1731, 1735, 1737, 1738, and 1742 John. • Lower the following B-Boxes to finished grade: 1226 Willow Way, 1733 John, 1214 Evergreen. • Lower and replace cracked B-Box cap at 1209 Willow Way. • Repair bent B-Box at 1225 Willow Way. • Clean PCC out of B-Box at 1734 John and 1210 Evergreen. • Raise buried 16" valve vault rim at north intersection of John & Evergreen. • Hydrant @ John Street Sta. 12+50L-Replace broken aux. valve box. • 16" VV @ east side Rob Roy Creek-Lower rim about 18" and regrade this area. Place 4x4 marker post. • Hydrant H15 - This will probably need to be raised, but will be placed on the Unit 7 punchlist. • 16" VV west of Rob Roy Creek- This will probably need to be raised, but will be placed on the Unit 7 punchlist. • Raise, clean, and straighten buried valve No. V3. • Raise, clean, & straighten buried aux. valve box for Hydrant H15. Storm • Lots of mud visible in storm structures. Clean out all structures and sewers. • Landscape area near ST 19, which was reset recently. • ST 23 -Lower rim about 4". Regrade area around structure to drain properly. • ST 35 - Clean out mud & debris. • • ST 4 — Set one MH step. Remove debris from MH(stakes below water line). • ST 2— Set 2 MH steps @ bottom. • FES @ Lot Nos. 216-217 —Re-landscape pond above outfall. • ST 15 —Remove fabric once lots are landscaped. • Pond outfall to creek—Grout around 12" DIP exiting structure. • North FES discharging to pond—place more riprap. • Grade and landscape around ST 17, which was raised recently. • Repair crushed/broken storm sewer between MH Nos. 7-8 and 40-41. SIDEWALK/TRAILS • Cut and re-pave corners of trail as marked at the back-of-curb to eliminate trip hazard at Lot Nos. 182, 165, 173, and 201. • Check trail for flat/low spots at the following locations. Replace and/or grade swales as needed to get drainage to storm drains. o South of Lot 176 o Rear of Lot 162 o Rear of Lot 172 • Patch the trail as marked at Lot Nos. 172 and 220. Unit 6 Sanitary: • MH S3 — Seal frame. • Vacuum test manholes. Manholes were vacuum tested on 2/22/99 with all failing. Repair any deficiencies and retest as required. Roadway: • Run cables to provide power to the streetlights on Sycamore Road. • Reimburse city for cost of installing signage. • Add a triangular piece of sidewalk at NW corners of Sycamore/John intersection to make the N/S walk align properly. • Rem & Rep12 squares as marked about 40 feet south of San. MH S-3. • Replace three dead parkway trees. Miscellaneous: • Submit 2 prints of record drawings of all improvements for review. Final record drawings to be submitted on Mylar with 2 sets of prints. Also submit CAD files if possible. Route 34 Improvements Storm Sewer: • Entire storm sewer system needs to be jetted to remove mud. Clean out all manholes, catch basins, and inlets. • MH No.10—Remove stack of adjusting rings and replace with a barrel section. o • Raise the buried MH just east of FES #7. • Reset and seal offset frame of MH just west of FES #1. Traffic Signals: • Apply sealant around exposed metal and cover foundations with topsoil. Miscellaneous: • Submit 2 prints of record drawings of all improvements for review. Final record drawings to be submitted on Mylar with 2 sets of prints. Also submit CAD files if possible • Need IDOT acceptance letter for work in IDOT right-of-way. • Reset/replace disturbed concrete monument west of MH No.2. These punchlists are scheduled for discussion at the Public Works Committee meeting on January 27, 2003. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WETLANDS PROTECTION ORDINANCE Article 1 Authority, Purpose and Definitions Section 1.1 Statutory Authority This Ordinance is enacted pursuant to the police powers granted to this City by Illinois Revised Statutes, Chapter 24. Section 1.2 Findings The United City of Yorkville finds that Isolated Waters of Yorkville and Waters of the U.S. for the Blackberry Creek, Rob Roy, and Fox River watersheds including the creek and river, and all their tributaries, are indispensable and fragile resources that provide many public benefits including maintenance of surface and groundwater quality through nutrient cycling and sediment trapping as well as flood and storm water runoff control through temporary water storage, slow release, and groundwater recharge. In addition, Isolated Waters of Yorkville and Waters of the U.S. provide open space; passive outdoor recreation opportunities; fish and wildlife habitat for many forms of wildlife including migratory waterfowl, and rare, threatened or endangered wildlife and plant species; and pollution treatment via biological and chemical oxidation processes. Preservation of the remaining Isolated Waters of Yorkville and Waters of the U.S. in a natural condition shall be and is necessary to maintain hydrological, economic, recreational, and aesthetic natural resource values for existing and future residents of the United City of Yorkville, and therefore the City Council declares a policy of no net loss of Isolated Waters of Yorkville and Waters of the U.S. Furthermore the City Council declares a long-term goal of net gain of Isolated Waters of Yorkville and Waters of the U.S. to be accomplished through mitigation requirements of this Ordinance. Section 1.3 Purpose of the Ordinance The principal purpose of this Ordinance is the protection, preservation, replacement, proper maintenance, restoration, and use in accordance with the character, adaptability, and stability of the Isolated Waters of Yorkville in order to prevent their pollution or contamination; minimize their disturbance and disturbance to the natural habitat therein; and prevent damage from erosion, siltation, and flooding. Other purposes of this ordinance include: • Preserve and enhance the natural hydrologic and hydraulic functions and natural characteristics of watercourses and wetlands to protect water quality, aquatic habitats, provide recreational and aesthetic benefits, and enhance community and economic development. • Maintain and enhance the special aquatic resources of the City. 1 • Protect environmentally sensitive areas from deterioration or destruction by private and public actions. • Protect and improve surface water quality and promote best management practices of surface water runoff prior to entering lakes, ponds, wetlands, streams, and rivers. • Require planning for development to carry out water resource management including the protection of natural areas such as remnant woodland and prairie habitats, wetlands, waterways, steep topography, and highly erodible soils, in order to reduce potential impacts, or creation of unstable conditions that may promote erosion and degradation of ground and surface water quality. • Coordination of and support for the enforcement of applicable federal, state, and county statutes, ordinances, and regulations pertaining to Waters of the U.S., floodplain regulatory, and soil erosion and sediment control. • Establishment of standards and procedures for the review and regulation of the use of Isolated Waters of Yorkville. • A procedure for appealing decisions. • Establishment of enforcement procedures and penalties for the violation of this Ordinance. Article 2 Definitions Section 2.1 Definition of Terms Terms not specifically defined shall have the meaning customarily assigned to them. Administrator is the person designated by the United City of Yorkville to administer and enforce this ordinance. agricultural land is land predominantly used for agricultural purposes. applicant is any person, firm, or governmental agency who submits an application for a permit under this ordinance (or other applicable ordinance of the City, e.g., development ordinance, zoning ordinance). BMP or best management practices is a measure used to control the adverse stormwater related effects of development, and includes structural devices (e.g., swales, filter strips, infiltration trenches, level spreaders, and site runoff storage basins designed to remove pollutants), reduce runoff rates and volumes, and protect aquatic habitats. In addition, nonstructural approaches used to prevent contamination of runoff include planning and design practices that reduce impervious areas, provide comprehensive site planning, and implement buffer zones, setback requirements, easements, and critical areas. Other nonstructural approaches include public education and maintenance programs. 2 buffer is an area of predominantly vegetated land adjacent to channels, wetlands, lakes, ponds, or other surface waters that are to be left undeveloped for the purpose of providing stabilization, reduction of contaminants, and eliminate or minimize impacts to such areas. For all new development, buffer areas shall consist of deep-rooted native vegetation. Category I wetland impact means wetland impacts to Isolated Waters of Yorkville that are less than or equal to one (1) acre and does not impact high quality aquatic resources. Category ll wetland impact means wetland impacts to Isolated Waters of Yorkville that are greater than one (1) acre and does not impact high quality aquatic resources. Category Ill wetland impact means wetland impacts to roadside drainage ditches or manmade stormwater management facilities that meet the definition of Isolated Waters of Yorkville. Category IV wetland impact means wetland impacts for the restoration, creation, and enhancement of Isolated Waters of Yorkville provided that there are net gains in aquatic resource function. Category V wetland impact means wetland impacts to high quality aquatic resources as defined in this Ordinance. channel is any river, stream, creek, brook, branch, natural or artificial depression, ponded area, flowage, slough, ditch, conduit, culvert, gully, ravine, wash, or natural or manmade drainageway that has a definite bed and bank or shoreline, in or into which surface, groundwater, effluent, or industrial discharges flow either perennially or intermittently. channel modification is alteration of a channel by changing the physical dimensions or materials of its bed or banks, and includes damming, riprapping (or other armoring), widening, deepening, straightening, relocating, lining, and significant removal of bottom or woody rooted vegetation, but does not include the clearing of debris or removal of trash or dredging to previously documented thalweg elevations and sideslopes. City is the United City of Yorkville. developer is a person, firm, or institution who creates or causes a development. development is any manmade change to the land and includes — A. the construction, reconstruction, repair, or replacement of a building or any addition to a building; B. the installation of utilities, construction of roads, bridges or similar projects; C. the construction or erection of levees, walls, fences, dams, or culverts; D. drilling or mining activities; E. the clearing of land as an adjunct of construction; 3 F. channel modifications, filling, dredging, grading, excavating, paving, or other nonagricultural alterations of the ground surface; G. any direct or indirect wetland impacts including the removal of vegetation to the extent such that the wetland would no longer meet the criteria of supporting a dominance of hydrophytic vegetation as defined in the 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual except that which would be considered appropriate for management purposes; H. any other activity of man that might change the direction, height, or velocity of flood or surface water, including the extensive removal of vegetation; I. the storage of materials and the deposit of solid or liquid waste; and J. the installation of a manufactured home on a site, the preparation of a site for a manufactured home, or the installation of a recreational vehicle on a site for more than 180 days. Development does not include maintenance of existing buildings and facilities such as resurfacing of roadways when the road elevation is not significantly increased or gardening, plowing, and similar agriculture practices that do not involve filling, grading, or construction of levees. Nor does development include agricultural uses, maintenance of existing drainage systems for the limited purpose of maintaining cultivated areas and crop production or for any agricultural uses or improvements undertaken pursuant to a written NRCS conservation plan. ecological restoration is the re-establishment of a natural area or plant community via associated management practices such as prescribed burns, weed control, selective clearing, reintroduction of native plant species, etc. ephemeral stream is a stream whose bed elevation does not intersect with the groundwater table and carries flow only during and immediately after a runoff producing rainfall event. erosion is the process whereby soil is removed by flowing water, wave action, or wind. farmed wetland means wetlands that are identified by the NRCS in a Certified Wetland Determination as currently farmed, or have been farmed within 5 years previous to the permit application date, as defined in 7 CFR Part 12 (61 FR 47025). fen is a wetland community that occurs in areas where glacial formations are such that carbonate-rich ground water discharges at a constant rate along the slopes of kames, eskers, moraines, river bluffs, dunes, or in flats associated with these formations.. floristic inventory is a record of all existing vegetation within a defined project area. This includes all woody (trees and shrubs) as well as herbaceous plants, i.e., wildflowers and grasses. Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) refers to a method of assessing landscapes based upon the existing vegetation. A useful method for determining the floristic quality of an area is through an analysis of the conservatism and diversity of species appearing in a plant inventory. Refer to floristic quality index and Mean C for further definition of terms. 4 Floristic Quality Index (FQ1) is a statistic derived by multiplying Mean C by the square root of the number of species inventoried. This parameter is correlated to the diversity and conservatism of native plant species present within a plant community as defined in Plants of the Chicago Region, 4th Ed. (Swink and Wilhelm,1994). forested wetland is an area dominated by wetland plants, that have a predominance of woody vegetation and a population of at least one of the following native trees or shrubs: Buttonbush, Pagoda Dogwood, Blue-fruited Dogwood, Black Ash, Butternut, or Swamp Whit Oak. This may include other conservative, native woody plants that may be found in wetland habitats, but not included in this list. functional assessment is an assessment of a wetland's flood storage, water quality, wildlife habitat, and other beneficial functions. groundwater is that water that is located within soil or rock below the surface of the earth. hemi-marsh is a wetland habitat that consists of approximately 40 — 50% open water and 50 — 60% emergent wetland. The open water areas are in the form of deeper water pockets that are interspersed with emergent wetland habitat. The structure and interspersion of vegetation within this type of wetland habitat make it more complex and diverse than an open water body surrounded by emergent vegetation. High Quality Aquatic Resources (HQAR) means aquatic areas considered to be regionally critical due to their uniqueness, scarcity, and/or value, and other wetlands considered to perform functions important to the public interest, as defined in 33 CFR Part 320.4(b) (2). These resources include ephemeral pools, fens, forested wetlands, sedge meadows, seeps, streams rated Class A or B in the Illinois Biological Stream Characterization study, streamside marshes, wet prairies, wetlands supporting Federal or Illinois endangered or threatened species, and wetlands with a native floristic quality index of 25 or greater and/or a native Mean C value of 3.2 or greater. hydrology is the science of the behavior of water including its dynamics, composition, and distribution in the atmosphere, on the surface of the earth and underground. hydrologically disturbed is an area where the land surface has been cleared, grubbed, compacted, or otherwise modified to alter stormwater runoff, volumes, rates, flow direction, or inundation duration. Index of Biotic Integrity (181) is a biological stream characterization rating system that assesses the quality of a stream from the sum of 12 metrics based on fish population composition, quality, and abundance. The IBI value can range from 12 to 60 (low to high rating). Isolated Waters of Yorkville means all wetlands and waterbodies such as ponds, lakes, streams, - including ephemeral and intermittent streams and roadside ditches with a drainage area greater than 20-acres - farmed wetlands, and detention basins that meet the criteria of wetland habitat as defined in the USACE 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual; and are not under U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jurisdiction and are located within the limits of the United City of Yorkville or with any area under consideration for annexation into the United City of Yorkville. 5 A. The limits of Isolated Waters of Yorkville extend to the ordinary high water mark or the delineated wetland boundary. B. Compensatory wetland mitigation created to meet the requirements of this Ordinance or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act is not excluded. intermittent stream is a stream whose bed intersects the groundwater table for only a portion of the year on average or any stream that flows continuously for at least one month out of the year, but not the entire year. lake is a body of water two or more acres in size that retains water throughout the year. linear Waters of the U.S. means wetlands along creeks, streams, rivers, ponds, lakes, or impoundments that are hydraulically connected to surface water. Mean C is the average coefficient of conservatism for a site. The concept of"conservatism" refers to the fundamental character of native plant species to display varying degrees of tolerance to disturbance, as well as varying degrees of fidelity to specific habitat integrity. As a result, each native species can be assigned a coefficient of conservatism (C value) ranging from 0 to 10, "weedy to conservative," reflecting its disposition within a defined geographic region. mitigation are measures taken to eliminate or minimize negative impacts caused from development activities, such as impact to Isolated Waters of Yorkville, by replacement of the resource. Native Mean Wetness is the wetness value (W) designated to each species. This value defines the estimated probability of each species occurring in a wetland. Plants are designated as Obligate Wetland (OBL=-5), Facultative Wetland (FACW=-3), Facultative (FAC=0), Facultative Upland(FACU=3), and Obligate Upland(UPL=5). natural area is a landscape with a sufficient level of intact habitat structure and plant species composition to resemble a pre-settlement landscape, e.g., prairie, oak savanna, and other landscapes native to Kendall County. NRCS is the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. pond is a body of water less than two acres in size that retains a normal water level year- round. qualified professional is a person trained in one or more of the disciplines of biology, geology, soil science, engineering, or hydrology whose training and experience ensure a competent analysis and assessment of stream, lake, pond, and wetland conditions and impacts. Relative Importance Value (RIV). The RIV for each species is calculated by summing relative frequency and relative cover and dividing by 2. The RIV is calculated from data collected during the transect inventory. 6 roadside ditches are drainage ditches created for the purpose of providing roadway drainage. runoff is the water derived from melting snow or rain falling within a tributary drainage basin that exceeds the infiltration capacity of the soils for that basin. seep is a wetland, herbaceous or wooded, with saturated soil or inundation resulting from the diffuse flow of groundwater to the surface stratum. site is all of the land contemplated to be part of a coordinated development of one or more parcels. thalweg is a line along the lowest point in a channel. USACE is the United States Army Corps of Engineers. valid wetland delineation means an on-site wetland delineation conducted in accordance with the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual within three years of the initial permit application date. watershed is the land area above a given point on a channel that contributes stormwater to that point. Waters of the U.S. is a term that refers to those water bodies and wetland areas that are under the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jurisdiction. wetland is land that is inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, under normal conditions, a prevalence of vegetation adapted Under v for life in saturated soil conditions (known as hydrophytic vegetation). A wetland is identified the higr based upon the three attributes: 1) hydrology, 2) soils, and 3) vegetation as mandated by to the n the 1987 Federal wetland determination methodology(Wetlands Delineation Manual). of no to protecti EPA tyE wetland impact is the direct or indirect loss of Isolated Waters of Yorkville that results from from po implementation of a proposed activity. This includes Isolated Waters of Yorkville that are adversely affected by flooding, excavation, dredging, fill, drainage, hydrological disturbance, vegetation removal (other than for maintenance or restoration purposes), that results from implementation of a development activity or dumping, or non-permitted discharge of chemicals or other pollutants into Isolated Waters of Yorkville. Article 3 Protection of Isolated Waters of Yorkville and Waters of the U.S. Section 3.1 General Standards The requirements of this Ordinance are for the region of the United City of Yorkville and based on the ecological characteristics of this region. Section 3.1.1 Buffer Requirements 7 1. Buffer areas shall be required for all areas defined as either Waters of the U.S. or Isolated Waters of Yorkville except for areas that meet a Category III definition. Waters of the U.S. as defined in Section 2.1 of this Ordinance refers to areas that are under the jurisdictional authority and regulated by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Isolated Waters of Yorkville are under the jurisdictional authority of this Ordinance and is defined in Section 2.1 of this Ordinance. 2. Buffer areas are divided into two types, linear buffers and water body buffers. The following buffer requirements shall be met for all proposed development projects and provided for all wetlands except for areas meeting the definition of a Category III wetland (roadside ditches and manmade stormwater management facility, refer to Section 2.1). a. Linear buffers shall be designated along both sides of the channel. The buffer width shall be determined as follows: 1) All channels except those determined to be High Quality Aquatic Resource (HQAR) shall have a minimum buffer of 30 feet. Also, five (5) additional feet of buffer shall be required for each percent of buffer slope greater than 5% up to a maximum of a 100 foot buffer. For example, a 30-foot buffer with a 10% slope will require an additional 25 feet of buffer. 2) Linear HQAR and streams with an Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) greater than 40 shall have a minimum buffer width of 100 feet on each side of the channel. (Initial IBI based on IEPA Illinois Water Quality Report. A site-specific IBI assessment may override this report). 3) For streambank stabilization projects, those projects that involve a change in land use shall apply the minimum 30 foot buffer and up to a maximum of 100 foot buffer criteria. If the project does not involve a change in land use, then a 10 foot buffer shall be required adjacent to all streambank stabilization work. b. Water body buffers shall encompass all non-linear bodies of water including wetlands. The buffer width shall be determined as follows: 1) For all water bodies including wetlands with a total surface area greater than one quarter (1/4) acre and equal to or less than one (1) acre and determined not to be a HQAR, a minimum buffer width of 30 feet shall be established. Also, five (5) additional feet of buffer shall be required for each percent of buffer slope greater than 5% up to a maximum of a 100 foot buffer 2) For all water bodies or wetlands with a total surface area greater than one (1) acre and determined not to be a HQAR, a minimum buffer width of 50 feet shall be established. Also, five (5) additional feet of buffer shall be required for each percent of buffer slope greater than 5% up to a maximum of a 100 foot buffer 3) For all water bodies or wetlands regardless of size that meet the definition of a HQAR (ephemeral pools, fens, forested wetlands, sedge meadows, seeps, streamside marshes, wet prairies, wetlands supporting Federal or Illinois endangered or threatened species, and wetlands with a native floristic quality index (FQI) of 25 or greater and/or a native Mean C value of 3.2 or greater), shall have a minimum buffer width of 100 feet. 8 3. Buffer areas for all linear and non-linear Isolated Waters of Yorkville or Waters of the U.S., except wetlands, shall extend from the ordinary high water mark. The buffer area for wetlands shall extend from the edge of the approved delineated wetland boundary. A site may contain buffer that originates from Waters of the U.S. or Isolated Waters of Yorkville on another property. 4. Buffers shall be established using appropriate native, deep-rooted vegetation, protected from direct and indirect disturbance, and shall be appropriately managed and maintained according to the approved plan as provided under Section 3.2.3. 5. If a buffer area is disturbed by permitted activities during construction, the buffer area shall be stabilized following the provisions of the United City of Yorkville's Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and appropriately planted with native vegetation. 6. Access through buffer areas shall be provided, when necessary, for maintenance purposes. Unless otherwise dedicated for a public purpose or to a public entity, buffer areas shall remain private property and are not generally accessible to the public. 7. Preservation of buffer areas shall be provided by deed or plat restrictions. No lot lines shall be allowed within the limits of the buffer areas. 8. Features of a stormwater management system approved by the Administrator may be allowed within the buffer area provided it is a naturalized detention basin that consists of a more natural design shape as well as native plant communities or other naturalized stormwater management features provided there is no direct discharge to the wetland habitat. The Administrator shall review and approve as appropriate well designed stormwater management systems within the buffer area on a project by project basis. 9. Stormwater discharges that enter a buffer shall have appropriate energy dissipation measures to prevent erosion and scour. 10. All buffer areas shall be maintained free from development including disturbance of the soil, dumping or filling, erection of structures, and placement of impervious surfaces except as follows: a. A buffer area may be used for passive recreation (e.g., bird watching, walking, jogging, bicycling, and picnicking) and it may contain pedestrian or bicycle trails, provided that the created path is no wider than 10 feet. If the path leads to a wetland, it must be designed to prevent erosion. b. Impervious surfaces including trails, may occupy a maximum of 15% of that portion of required buffer. c. Utility maintenance and maintenance of drainage facilities and drainage easements shall be allowed provided the maintenance activity meets all other federal, state, and local regulations. d. Anchoring and placement of boat docks and piers shall be allowed provided the structure meets all other federal, state, and local regulations. 9 Section 3.1.2 Wetland Hydrology Protection 1. Any development that may reasonably be expected to impact the recharge zone of a fen, seep, or other groundwater-driven wetlands with vegetation characteristic of these habitats require a higher level of protection. Due to the uniqueness and fragility of these habitats, the developer of any proposed development within such areas shall meet with the City and its representatives to determine permitting and mitigation requirements. Section 3.1.3 Detention in Waters of the U.S. and Isolated Waters of Yorkville 1. Detention shall only be allowed in farmed wetlands currently in farm production; or in Waters of the U.S. or Isolated Waters of Yorkville consist of an existing vegetative cover by a minimum of 85% of one or more of the following species. • Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea). • Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). • Common Reed (Phragmites australis). • buckthorn (Rhamnus spp.). In addition, the detention facility shall be designed as a naturalized wetland detention basin that contains native vegetation communities and does not exceed a 4-foot bounce for the 100-year, 24-hour storm event. 2. Mitigation requirements for wetland impacts due to development of detention facilities within the wetland habitat may be waived by the Administrator if the designed naturalized wetland detention meets the above criteria. If the proposed detention facility does not meet the above criteria, the mitigation requirements of Article 4 of this Ordinance shall apply. Section 3.1.4 Discharge to Waters of the U.S. or Isolated Waters of Yorkville 1. There shall be no direct discharge to Waters of the U.S. or Isolated Waters of Yorkville. All discharges shall be to the buffer and the applicant shall divert and detain one (1) inch of runoff per impervious acre with a minimum of 0.2 inches over the watershed area or provide similar level of treatment and provide energy dissipation such as a level spreader. Section 3.1.5 Protection of Waters of the U.S. and Isolated Waters of Yorkville During Development 1. All preserved Waters of the U.S. and Isolated Waters of Yorkville shall be protected during development such that a FQI calculated two years after the commencement of development shall not be more than five (5) points less than the originally calculated FQI. The re-evaluation of all preserved wetlands shall be completed during a similar stage of the growing season as was conducted for the original assessment (±30 days). If final build out of the development has not occurred, the re-evaluation of all preserved wetlands shall be repeated each year until completion of development. If there is a decrease in the FQI value for two consecutive years, and/or a > 5 point drop in the FQI value from the original value, a wetland impact to Isolated Waters of Yorkville or Waters of the U.S. shall be assumed, and the mitigation requirements of Section 4.2 of this Ordinance shall apply. 10 2. The initial re-evaluation data shall be submitted to the Administrator during the second year after commencement of the development. All subsequent re-evaluation data shall be provided to the Administrator on an annual basis until final build out of the development has occurred. Section 3.1.6 Maintenance of Stormwater Management Facilities 1. Dredging of stormwater management facilities for the purpose of periodic maintenance shall be allowed without the issuance of a Wetland Protection Permit given that the dredging activity will only re-establish the original design depths and measures shall be taken to preserve any wetland fringe and/or buffer (if applicable). If any disturbance to the wetland fringe is unavoidable, then the wetland fringe shall be restored with appropriate native vegetation. All applicable federal, state, and other local regulations and ordinances shall be met, and notification of the maintenance activities to the Administrator shall be required prior to commencement of the maintenance activity. Section 3.2 Wetland Permit Provisions Section 3.2.1 Applicability 1. No person, firm, corporation, governmental agency, or organized district shall commence any development regulated by the City on any lot or parcel of land without first submittal of applicable items presented in 3.2.2 and 3.2.3. 2. No lot lines shall occur in created, restored, enhanced, or preserved Waters of the U.S. or Isolated Waters of Yorkville and their associated buffer areas. Section 3.2.2 Wetland Determination Requirement 1. All development projects shall provide a letter of findings from a qualified professional that identifies all Waters of the U.S. or Isolated Waters of Yorkville, natural areas, and other habitats on the proposed project site or within 100 feet of the project site. Identification of each of these areas shall include a floristic inventory and floristic quality assessment (FQA) data. If no wetlands are identified within the limits of the site or within 100 feet of the site, then a wetland determination letter of findings shall be submitted, which shall contain the floristic inventory and FQA data. If Waters of the U.S. or Isolated Waters of Yorkville are identified within the limits of the site or within 100 feet of the site, a Wetland Permit Submittal following Section 3.2.3 shall be required. Section 3.2.3 Wetland Permit Submittal Requirements 1. The applicant shall provide a wetland delineation report as specified in Section 3.2.4 of this Ordinance. In addition, the applicant shall provide a narrative report as part of the wetland permit submittal and Site Plan that demonstrates compliance with the provisions of Sections 3.1.1 through 3.1.6 of this Ordinance and specifies prescribed management activities and long-term management provisions following Article 5 of this Ordinance for the buffer area(s). 2. The applicant shall provide a USACE statement of jurisdictional determination as to which wetlands on the development site are Waters of the U.S. or Isolated Waters of 11 Yorkville. A copy of the letter shall be provided to the Administrator. The wetland permit submittal requirements for potential wetland impacts depend upon whether the proposed impact is within Waters of the U.S. or Isolated Waters of Yorkville as provided below. If the proposed development may impact both Waters of the U.S. and Isolated Waters of Yorkville, the applicant shall meet the requirements of a.(1) and a.(2) and provide all required items under b. Wetland Impacts to Isolated Waters of Yorkville, as identified below. a. Wetland Impacts to Waters of the U.S.: The following information is required. 1) A USACE permit for the proposed development or a letter from the USACE that states the proposed development does not require USACE authorization. 2) All wetland impacts that occur in the City's jurisdiction that exceed the mitigation threshold of the USACE regulatory program shall be mitigated for within the limits of the City's jurisdiction at the mitigation ratio specified by the USACE for that development impact. 3) Soil erosion and sediment control measures following the City's Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. b. Wetland Impacts to Isolated Waters of Yorkville: The following information is required. 1) A cover letter signed by the applicant that provides a clear project purpose and need statement, a description of the proposed activity, area (in acres) of wetland impact, date upon which the activity is proposed to commence, a list of all federal, state, county, or other local government permits or approvals required for the proposed project including permit approvals and denials already received, and a statement on the permit category to be used as follows: a). Category I: Wetland impacts less than or equal to one (1) acre and does not impact a HQAR. b). Category II: Wetland impacts greater than one (1) acre and does not impact a HQAR. c). Category III: Roadside ditches and stormwater management facilities that meet the definition of Isolated Waters of Yorkville. d). Category IV: Wetland impacts for the restoration, creation, and enhancement of wetlands, including streambank stabilization, that utilize biotechnical treatment techniques or a similar treatment approved by the Administrator, provided that there are net gains in aquatic resource function. e). Category V: Wetland impacts that affect a HQAR. 2) Documentation that the development is in compliance with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources' Endangered Species Consultation Program 12 and the Illinois Natural Areas Preservation Act [520 ILCS 10/11 and 525 ILCS 30/17]. 3) Documentation that the development is in compliance with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's consultation program under the Endangered Species Act. 4) A statement on the occurrence of any HQAR on or adjacent to the development. 5) A mitigation plan (if applicable) that meets the requirements of Section 4 of this Ordinance. 6) (For Category II and Category V impacts only) — A narrative of the alternative measures taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate for wetland impacts to Isolated Waters of Yorkville. 7) (For Category Ill impacts only) — A narrative of the measures taken to mitigate for water quality functions. 8) Soil erosion and sediment control measures following the City's Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. Section 3.2.4 Requirements for Wetland Delineation 1. Before any development in or near Waters of the U.S., or in or near Isolated Waters of Yorkville, a wetland delineation that identifies the boundaries, location, function, and applicable floristic quality of all onsite Waters of the U.S. and Isolated Waters of Yorkville as well as a floristic inventory and FQA data of natural areas and other habitats on the proposed project site shall be submitted. The presence and limits of wetland areas shall be determined by a valid wetland delineation conducted in accordance with the 1987 USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual. Delineations for permitting purposes shall generally be performed only during the period beginning the 2nd week of March and ending the first week of December. Any presence of farmed wetlands shall be determined by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). 2. The following are minimum requirements for the Wetland Delineation Report: a. A plan shall be submitted showing the exact location of Waters of the U.S. and Isolated Waters of Yorkville within the development boundaries. The wetland boundary shall be flagged in the field. In order to determine buffer requirements and any applicable wetland mitigation requirements, the wetland boundary shall be surveyed. b. An aerial photograph delineating the wetland and the development boundaries shall be provided. c. A copy of the following maps (most recent available) delineating the development boundary shall be provided: • USGS topographic map. • Kendall County soil survey map. 13 • NWI map. • FEMA floodplain map. d. Completed USACE data sheets with representative color photographs provided for each data point. e. A written description shall be provided for each wetland habitat(s), and shall include the following: 1) FQA of each wetland as determined by the methodology contained in Swink, F. and G. Wilhelm's Plants of the Chicago Region (1994. 4th Edition). In general, the floristic inventory shall be conducted between May 1st and October 15th. Floristic assessments conducted outside this time period may require additional sampling during the growing season to satisfy this requirement. 2) Completed wildlife habitat assessment for each wetland that evaluates utilization of the wetland by wildlife, interspersion and structure of vegetative cover (number of plant communities, e.g., emergent marsh, wet prairie, seep, forested, etc., present within the wetland system), and ratio of vegetative cover to open water. 3) Description of the present functions provided by each wetland. f. If any farmed wetlands are present, a letter from NRCS shall be provided. 3. Waters of the U.S. and Isolated Waters of Yorkville within 100 feet of the development property shall be identified. Methods of identification include site specific delineation according to the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual. If such delineation is not available, then wetlands identified on a NWI map may be sufficient. - Article 4 Wetland Impacts and Mitigation Requirements All development that has a wetland impact shall comply with this Article. A wetland permit for any wetland impact shall be obtained from the Administrator. Any impact on a portion of a wetland complex shall require an evaluation of the entire wetland complex to determine the total impacts, direct or indirect, on the wetland complex. The zone of negative impact will determine the wetland impact and mitigation acreage requirements. Section 4.1 Unmitigable Wetland Impacts 1. Wetlands of any size identified as having a FQI greater than or equal to 35 or mean C value of 3.5 or greater shall not be impacted via flooding, excavation, dredging, fill, drainage, or other hydrological disturbance, vegetation removal (other than for maintenance or restoration purposes) as part of any development or dumping, or non-permitted discharge of chemicals or other pollutants. The FQI is solely based on the wetland vegetation. To 14 determine the floristic value of the wetland, buffers and adjacent plant communities shall not be included in the calculation. 2. If the application of this section would (i) have the effect of depriving the owner of all economically beneficial or productive use of the land; or (ii) make the construction or installation of an essential public improvement by a public entity impossible or highly impracticable, the applicant may apply for a variance from the requirements of this section under Article 8. If such a variance is granted, mitigation for the wetland impact allowed shall be made in accordance with Section 4.2 of this Ordinance. Section 4.2General Wetland Mitigation Requirements 1. Mitigation shall be required for all impacts, regardless of size to Category V wetlands. 2. Mitigation shall be required for wetland impacts greater than or equal to 1/4 (0.25) acre to Isolated Waters of Yorkville defined under Category I and Category II wetland impacts. 3. Mitigation shall provide for the replacement of the wetland habitat lost to development activities at the following ratios (creation acreage to wetland impact acreage): a. A minimum of 1.5:1 for wetland impacts under Category I or II that are not to a HQAR and are mitigated on-site b. A minimum of 10:1 for wetland impacts that are to a HQAR under Category V and are mitigated on-site 4. Wetland impacts covered under Category III will not require mitigation per se, but at a minimum, shall replace the water quality functions through BMP's as approved by the Administrator. 5. No mitigation is required for Category IV wetland impacts provided the restoration, creation, or enhancement contributes a net gain of aquatic resource function(s). However, Category IV wetland impacts shall be required to provide items 1, 2.b.(1) — 2.b.(4), and 2.b.(8) of Section 3.2.3 of this Ordinance. The rates of mitigation 6. Mitigated wetlands shall be designed to optimize hydrologic requirementso are higher 9 9 Pstability than some other diversity. Wetlands with designed permanent open water area(s) ; ordinances for HQAR, but mitigation acreage. given their uniqueness, hopefully higher rates will 7. Any creation of wetlands for required mitigation shall take place or .deter impacts. are not of a remnant plant community, wetlands, or other natural areas on the site. 8. Enhancement of existing wetlands may be used as mitigation credits for up to 25% of the enhanced wetland acreage completed, and provided that the wetland impact acreage created on-site is at a minimum 1:1 ratio and the impacted wetland(s) does not meet the definition of HQAR. 9. All wetland mitigation areas shall be buffered according to the requirements of Section 3.1.1. No buffer is required for that portion of a wetland mitigation area that is adjacent to an existing preserved wetland. 15 10. A five-year wetland mitigation irrevocable letter of credit in favor of the City or equivalent security for 110% of mitigation cost following the provisions of Article 10 of this Ordinance shall be submitted prior to obtaining a permit. 11. Wetland impacts occurring prior to issuance of a Wetland Permit shall presume the wetland disturbed was a HQAR and shall require mitigation at a minimum rate of 10:1. Section 4.2.1 Off-site Mitigation Requirements 1. For wetland mitigation that is proposed off-site of the development site, but within the same watershed as the wetland impact, the mitigation rate shall be 1 1/2 (1.5) times the on- site required mitigation acreage and shall meet the requirements of the Wetland Mitigation Plan, Section 4.2. 2. For wetland mitigation that is proposed off-site of the development site and outside the watershed of the wetland impact, the mitigation rate shall be three (3.0) times the on-site required mitigation acreage and shall meet the requirements of the Wetland Mitigation Plan, Section 4.2. 3. For those impacts that will have a total wetland impact of less than or equal to 0.5 acre and not affect a HQAR, mitigation may be allowed by the payment of a fee-in-lieu of mitigation following the provisions of Article 11. The fees paid in lieu shall be comparable to mitigation off-site, but within the same watershed as the wetland impact. The mitigation rate shall be 1 1/2 (1.5) times the on-site required mitigation acreage for calculation of the estimate of probable mitigation cost. Section 4.2.2 Wetland Mitigation Plan 1. A Wetland Mitigation Plan shall be submitted. At a minimum, the plan shall contain the following: a. A narrative description of the wetland impacts and proposed mitigation including a summary table with acreage for each existing wetland, proposed impact acreage, and proposed mitigation acreage. This summary table shall also be presented on the Wetland Mitigation Plan graphic. b. A description of the proposed mitigation site including the following: • existing conditions. • hydrology. • vegetation, including FQA data. • soils. • topography. c. If the owner is different then the applicant, identify the owner of the site and provide a written assurance from the owner that the applicant has permission to use the site for mitigation. 16 d. If off-site mitigation is proposed, provide the following maps to identify the location of the mitigation site: • USGS topographic map. • County soil survey. • NWI map. • NRCS swampbuster map (if applicable). • Hydrologic Atlas. • Aerial photograph(s). • Site photographs. e. Documentation of the proposed mitigation parameters. It is strongly recommended that wetland mitigation should attempt to restore wetland hydrology to historic hydric soils that have been drained or dewatered. Also, where possible, grading activities for wetland creation and/or restoration should be minimized. 1) Hydrologic Conditions — Identify_ source(s) of water, both surface and groundwater; include on-site and off-site water sources and factors that influence water quality. Describe and provide model results of the expected hydroperiod (at a minimum, 2-yr, 10-yr, and 100-yr, 24-hr storm events), including frequency, duration, and depth of inundation or saturation. 2) Planting Plan - Provide a planting plan, including a complete list of plants by common and scientific name for each community type; quantities of seed, plugs, rootstock, transplants, or other propagules; specific planting locations; description of planting methods; and a planting schedule. Provide plant list per designated plant community or zone on the Wetland Mitigation Plan graphic. Seed and plant stock source(s) shall originate from within 200 miles of the mitigation site. 3) Soil Characteristics— Provide a detailed soil profile description. Based on the proposed grading plan (if applicable) identify the soil conditions that will be present from 12 inches to 24 inches below the surface. Provide a description of methods to be used in the planting/seed bed preparation including allowable compaction, treatment of potential compacted soils, depth of topsoil, disking of topsoil with top layer of subsurface soil, etc. Identify the source and soil series of topsoil to be used. 4) Topography — Submit existing and proposed grades with 1-foot contour lines and reference elevations to bench marks. f. Provide a detailed narrative and illustrate applicable items on the Wetland Mitigation Plan graphic for the proposed implementation schedule that identifies the key components of the mitigation including, but not limited to, site preparation including placement of construction fencing, installation of soil erosion and sediment control measures, construction methods, time of year, stockpile locations and length of time soil would be stockpiled, types of equipment to be used, identification of construction access points, protection of preserved Isolated Waters of Yorkville and 17 Waters of the U.S., planting schedule, post-planting maintenance and monitoring etc. g. Proposed Management Activities. 1) Prescribed Activities During 5-year Monitoring — Describe planned maintenance activities including, but not limited to, soil erosion and sediment control inspections, control of undesirable plant species, herbivore control, trash removal, prescribed burn management, enhancement planting, and any other necessary activities. Provide a schedule that indicates approximate month and year for each of the proposed activities and inspections. Schedules for overseeding, replanting, or other remedial measures to be undertaken shall be identified in the appropriate annual report. 2) Responsible Parties — Follow the provisions of Article 5 of this Ordinance. 3) Long-term Management — identify long-term management strategies that shall include a prescribed burn management program for all applicable portions of the mitigation. If burn management is not utilized, documentation shall be submitted that specifies the reasons why burn management will not be used and describes alternative management strategies that are known to be effective. h. Proposed Monitoring Protocol. Following the general USACE guidelines, a 5-year mitigation monitoring period shall be required to assess the success of the mitigation. The first monitoring year is considered the first full growing season post installation. In general, if the as-built conditions are completed by end of May in a particular year, that year can be considered the first monitoring year. If installation is not completed until later in the growing season, then the first monitoring year will be the next calendar year. From the quality of native vegetation development across a landscape, one can infer that similar development may be occurring with other elements of the native biota (desirable insects, birds, etc.). Therefore, the following monitoring protocol for wetland mitigation shall be adhered to. Provide a description of a monitoring protocol that meets the following provisions. 1) General Sampling Methods. Every year of the required monitoring period, monitoring shall include two (2) monitoring events: one in late spring (May— mid-June) and the second during the late summer period from mid-August to mid-October. The purpose of the spring visit is a qualitative assessment of the mitigation site, accomplished through a meander throughout the entire mitigation area, including the buffer area, and inventories of vegetation across the different plant communities/zones. Denote any site conditions where land management should be addressed (e.g.,weed control, herbivory impacts, soil erosion and sedimentation impacts). The spring site visit shall be documented in a field report as described in Section 4.2.3. 18 The focus of the second monitoring event is not only to provide an amplified qualitative assessment, but also to conduct a quantitative sampling along transect lines and document the site conditions with photographs that are taken at permanent photo stations. The general inventory and FQA data shall be compiled and summarized in the annual monitoring report as described in Section 4.2.3 2) Transect Sampling Methods. At least one (1) transect line shall be established within each of the proposed plant communities across the mitigation site, including one in the buffer area. Transect locations shall be documented so that sampling can be repeated year to year. A sufficient number of quadrats shall be sampled along each transect line to provide full representation of the plant community. In general, a minimum of ten (10) 0.25 square meter quadrats per transect is sufficient. Quadrat intervals and number will depend on the size and uniformity of the plant community. The sampling procedure includes the recording of all plant species within the quadrat and the assignment of a cover value. For further detail of the sampling method refer to the "Monitoring Vegetation" chapter in The Tallgrass Restoration Handbook: for prairies, savannas, and woodlands (Packard, S. and Mutel, C. 1996). From these data, the mean C, FQI, and relative importance values (RIV) are generated and are to be compared with results of the previous monitoring events. To a large degree, it is through the comparison of yearly FQA data that management decisions are made and ultimately the success and/or performance of the wetland mitigation are determined. 3) Additional Monitoring Parameters. In addition to the FQA methodology stated above, some projects may require additional monitoring parameters such as hydrology, wildlife, etc. The requirements of additional monitoring parameters shall be reviewed and required (if any) on a project by project basis. 4) Preliminary Wetland Delineation. A preliminary wetland delineation of the mitigation wetland(s) boundary shall be conducted during the third (3rd) year of monitoring. The extent of developed wetland shall be based on the prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation. If the delineated wetland acreage deviates negatively, 10% or greater than the required mitigation acreage, the applicant shall be required to prepare and submit a Remedial Action Plan to the Administrator. The Remedial Action Plan shall address measures that will be undertaken to resolve the lack of wetland habitat. The Remedial Action Plan shall be 19 submitted to the Administrator within sixty (60) days of submitting the preliminary wetland delineation findings. Refer to Section 4.2.3 for monitoring report requirements. If the applicant fails to comply with the provisions of this section, the City may draw upon the required performance security following the provisions of Article 10 of this Ordinance to remediate the mitigation site conditions. 5) Final Wetland Delineation. A final wetland delineation of the mitigation wetland(s) boundary shall be conducted during the fifth (5th) monitoring year. If the delineated wetland acreage does not meet the required mitigation wetland acreage, the Administrator may require an extension of the 5-year monitoring period, payment of fee-in-lieu equivalent to the costs associated with the development, planting, monitoring and maintenance of the wetland acreage that is lacking, or request other measures to meet the intention, requirements, and spirit of this Ordinance. Failure to meet the required wetland acreage shall be reviewed and measures required on a project by project basis. i. Proposed Performance Standards. 1) Erosion Control —A biodegradable erosion blanket shall be used for areas up to the 2-year stage and a temporary cover crop shall be seeded within the wetland mitigation including the buffer areas above the 2-year stage immediately upon completion of construction activities to reduce soil erosion. Within one (1) month, at least 90% of the seeded area, as measured by aerial coverage, shall be vegetated. If the permanent seed matrix is not sown with the temporary crop, it must then be seeded at the earliest appropriate time. If a temporary crop is not seeded immediately upon completion of work, a soil erosion blanket shall be installed to reduce soil erosion. Any bare soil areas not vegetated within one (1) month of project completion shall require implementation of appropriate stabilization measures to prevent erodible soils. 2) Floristic Quality Assessment. a) General Inventory. By the end of the third full growing season, 30% of the seeded species and 90% of the plugged species should be present; and native mean C and native FQI values shall be greater than or equal to 2.5 and 15, respectively, for each installed plant community. By the end of the fifth full growing season, a native mean C value of greater than or equal to 3.2 shall be achieved as measured for each of the plant community types that comprise the mitigation area, including the buffer area. The native mean C value must increase each successive year after installation. This mean C value is generated from the general inventory assessment. 20 By the end of the fifth full growing season, the native FQI value shall be greater than or equal to 20 as measured for each of the plant community types that comprise the mitigation area including the buffer area. The native FQI must increase each successive year after installation. This FQI value is also generated from the general inventory assessment. By the end of the fifth full growing season, the native mean W shall be less than or equal to zero (0) in each of the wetland communities. The mean W is generated from the general inventory assessment. Generally, prior to the fifth monitoring year, the FQA data presented in the annual report should reflect a positive trend in floristic metrics in order to be confident that the mitigation shall meet the stated performance standards in the fifth year. If the mean wetness coefficient is greater than zero (0), this is an indication that wetland conditions are not developing. If the native mean C has not increased from the previous year's monitoring results, this is an indication that additional management activities may be required. It is in the permittee's best interest to take necessary measures early in the project in order to ensure compliance with the proposed wetland mitigation. b) Transect Inventory. The RIV of total native plants shall increase each successive year after installation. This RIV is generated from the transect inventory assessment. Generally, at the transect level there should be a positive trend in the floristic metrics for the mitigation monitoring period. If such a trend is observed, one can conclude that for a particular plant community all reasonable measures have been taken to manage that area. 3) General Standards. a) By the end of the fifth full growing season, no area over the entire mitigation site greater than 0.5 square meter shall be devoid of vegetation, as measured by areal coverage, unless specified in the approved mitigation plan. This standard does not apply to emergent communities. b) By the end of the fifth full growing season, none of the three most dominant plant species in any of the communities that comprise the mitigation site, which includes the buffer area, may be non-native or weedy species including, but not limited to, Reed Canary Grass, Common Reed, Kentucky Blue Grass, Purple Loosestrife, cattails, Sandbar Willow, Field Thistle, and woody shrubs such as buckthorn, Eurasian honeysuckles, European High Bush Cranberry, and other non-native, weedy species. c) By the end of the fifth full growing season, the proposed wetland acreage as depicted in the approved plan shall have been achieved. The extent, or deficiency of wetland acreage, that has not been achieved, is the extent to 21 4. which the applicant shall be liable. The applicant shall meet with the Administrator to determine the acceptable means by which the applicant shall meet his/her required wetland mitigation acreage. Based upon the review and decision of the Administrator, the applicant may be required to (i) create or restore on-site wetland habitat, (ii) provide additional mitigation credits through enhancement measures for other existing wetland(s), or (iii) provide funding into the fee-in-lieu program following the provisions of Article 11 of this Ordinance for the deficit of wetland acreage. Should the applicant choose to provide the additional required mitigation credits via creation, restoration, or enhancement measures, the applicant shall be required at a minimum, to maintain and monitor the creation, restoration, or enhancement wetland(s) for an additional three (3) years. Should the applicant choose to provide enhancement measures, the applicant shall provide baseline floristic data of the proposed enhancement wetland(s). 4) Additional Proposed Criteria — Depending upon the mitigation plan submitted there may be other criteria considered to supplement the above standards. These shall be evaluated on a project by project basis. 5) Wetland Mitigation Plan graphic shall include at a minimum the following information: • Existing and proposed grades with 1-foot contour lines and reference elevations to bench marks. • Summary Wetland Impact/Mitigation Acreage Table. • Implementation Schedule. • Clearly identify proposed wetland impacts, wetland mitigation area(s) denoting creation vs. enhancement wetlands, and limits of required buffer areas. • Table of plant species per community type including scientific and common names, type of plant material, and quantity per species. • Soil erosion and sediment control measures. • Protection of preserved Waters of the U.S. and Isolated Waters of Yorkville. • Water level control structures, BMPs, and other applicable mitigation items to meet the requirements of this Ordinance. Section 4.2.3 Post Construction Submittal Requirements 1. Submit as-built conditions to the Administrator for review and approval as identified below. a. Final Grading — upon completion of final grading but before planting, submit certified as-built plans with benchmarks that depict elevations in the mitigation area(s), including invert elevations of all water control structures. The normal water level elevation and resulting acreage of open water, if applicable, shall be specified. Provide a narrative explanation for any deviation from the approved mitigation plan. 22 If the grades are not in compliance with the approved plan, the permittee shall be responsible for taking all necessary corrective measures. b. Vegetation — submit a list of the actual species seeded and planted by scientific and common names for each community zone, including the quantity of each species installed (seed weight/acre, number of plugged plants/acre), dates of seeding and/or planting, source of stock, and the installation method(s). The vegetation as-built submittal shall include the Wetland Mitigation Plan graphic that demarks the limits of each community zone installed and identifies any revisions to the planting plan. 2. Monitoring Reports. a. Field reports shall be prepared and submitted to the Administrator following the late spring monitoring event within two weeks of the initial monitoring visit. The field report shall include a brief description of existing site conditions and proposed management activities that should be addressed during the present growing season. b. Annual monitoring reports shall be prepared and submitted to the Administrator by January 30th of the following year. The annual reports shall include the FQA data and discussion of FQA results, when applicable, discussion of adherence to the appropriate performance standards, narrative of the general site conditions, identification of management activities that occurred during the growing season, recommended management activities to occur over the successive 12-month period, and photographs from the established photo stations. The first year monitoring report shall also include a description of the transect line locations as well as a graphic of the Wetland Mitigation Plan that denotes the location of all established transect lines and permanent photo stations. Years 3 and 5 monitoring reports shall also include the results of the surveyed wetland delineation including completed data forms and a graphic that depicts the location of data point. Section 4.2.4 Wetland Permit Conditions 1. The Administrator or City Council, as applicable, shall attach any reasonable conditions considered necessary to ensure that the intent of Article 4 will be fulfilled, to minimize or mitigate damage or impairment to, encroachment in or interference with natural resources and processes within the protected wetlands or watercourses, or to otherwise improve or maintain the water quality. Any conditions related to wetland mitigation shall follow the provisions of Article 4 of this Ordinance. 2. The Administrator or the City Council, as applicable, shall require the applicant to file with the City, a cash or corporate surety bond or irrevocable bank letter of credit. An amount will be determined to ensure compliance with the wetland permit approval conditions and the conditions of this Ordinance as required in Article 10 Performance Security. 3. Any change that increases the size of scope of the development and that affects the criteria considered in approving the permit as determined by the Administrator or City Council as applicable may require the filing of a new wetland permit submittal. 23 • 4. Any temporary, seasonal, or permanent operation that is discontinued for two (2) years or two (2) seasons shall be presumed to have been abandoned and the wetland permit automatically voided. 5. Any permit granted under this Ordinance may be revoked or suspended by the Administrator or City Council, as applicable, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing, for any of the following causes: • A violation of a condition of the permit. • Misrepresentation or failure to fully disclose relevant facts in the application. • A change in a condition that requires a temporary or permanent change in the activity. 6. An applicant who has received a wetland permit under this Ordinance shall comply with the following in connection with any construction or other activity on the property for which the wetland permit has been issued: a. Maintain soil erosion control structures and measures, including but not limited to, silt fences, straw bale berms, and sediment traps. The permittee shall allow periodic inspections throughout the duration of the project by the City or its representatives. b. Maintain clear delineation of the protected wetlands and wetland buffers during the on-going development activities. 7. The wetland permit shall remain effective for a time period coincidental with any other land use permit reviewed and approved concurrent with the wetland permit. If applied for prior to the expiration date and concurrent with the expiring land use permit, the applicant may be granted an extension that corresponds to additional time granted for the underlying land use permit. Extensions shall be approved by the same person or body that made the original decision. The maximum number of extensions shall coincide with the maximum number allowed for the underlying land use permit. 8. When there is no other activity or permit involved, the wetland permit shall remain effective for one (1) year. A maximum of a one (1) year extension may be approved by the granting authority upon request of the applicant. Section 4.2.5 Mitigation Requirements for Non-performing Wetlands 1. At the end of the 5-year monitoring period or upon an earlier request for the release of the performance security, the Administrator or his/her agent shall evaluate the wetland mitigation for compliance with the performance standards, conditions, and standards of this Ordinance. If the Administrator or his/her agent determines that the wetland mitigation meets the performance standards, conditions, and wetland protection standards of this Ordinance, he/she shall release the performance security. If the Administrator or his/her agent determines that the wetland mitigation does not meet the above stated requirements, the applicant shall meet with the Administrator to determine the acceptable means by which the applicant shall meet his/her wetland mitigation obligation(s). Based upon the review and decision of the Administrator, the applicant may be required to (1) create or restore 24 additional on-site wetland habitat for any deficit of wetland acreage, (2) provide additional mitigation credits through enhancement measures for other existing wetland(s), or (3) provide funding into the fee-in-lieu program. 2. If the Administrator requests that the applicant meet his/her mitigation requirements via payment in-lieu, the Administrator shall make an estimate of the probable cost of mitigating for the deficiency in performance. The Administrator shall have the right to draw on the performance security the amount of funds appropriate to remedy the wetland mitigation to meet the performance standards, conditions, and wetland protection standards of this Ordinance. The remainder of the performance security shall then be released. The amount withheld for remedy of the mitigation shall be deposited in the fund created under and expended in the manner described in Article 11. Article 5 Long-Term Maintenance Provisions Section 5.1 Long-term Maintenance 1. Unless maintenance responsibility has been delegated to and accepted by another person under this section, the owner shall maintain that portion of the preserved and mitigation wetlands and their associated buffers. With the approval of the Administrator the preserved and mitigation wetlands and their associated buffers may be: a. Dedicated or otherwise transferred to and accepted by the City or other public entity. b. Conveyed or otherwise transferred to and accepted by a homeowner's association, or similar entity, with the members being the owners of all lots or parcels comprising the development. c. Conveyed to one or more persons or in one or more undivided interests to one or more persons. 2. Except for those portions of the preserved and mitigation wetlands and their associated buffers to be dedicated or otherwise transferred to the City or other public entity, included in the application for a wetland permit shall be a plan for the long-term management, operation and maintenance of the preserved and mitigation wetlands and their associated buffers and a description of the sources of funding therefore. Amendments to the plan must be approved by the Administrator. Section 5.2Transfer to City or Other Public Entity 1. If any portion of the preserved and mitigation wetlands and their associated buffers is to be dedicated or otherwise transferred to the City or other public entity under Section 5.1(a), appropriate easements for ingress and egress and maintenance of such portions shall be reserved for the benefit of such entity on the final plat. Section 5.3 Transfer to Homeowner's or Similar Association 25 1. If any portion of the preserved and mitigation wetlands and their associated buffers is to be conveyed or otherwise transferred to a homeowner's or similar association under Section 5.1(b) then: a. Appropriate easements for ingress and egress and maintenance of such portions shall be reserved for the benefit of such association and the City on the final plat. b. The association shall be duly incorporated and a copy of the Certificate of Incorporation, duly recorded, and bylaws and any amendment to either of them, shall be delivered to the Administrator. c. The bylaws of the association shall, at a minimum, contain the following: 1) A provision acknowledging and accepting the association's obligation to maintain those portions of the preserved and mitigation wetlands and their associated buffer areas conveyed or otherwise transferred to it under this Ordinance. 2) A mechanism for imposing an assessment upon the owners of all of the lots or parcels comprising the development that is sufficient, at a minimum, to provide for the maintenance of those portions of the preserved and mitigation wetlands and their associated buffers conveyed or otherwise transferred to it under this Ordinance, and the payment of all taxes levied thereon. A Special Service Area shall be established for the development area to provide an ongoing revenue source in the event that the homeowners association is not managing the wetland. 3) A provision adopting the plan of long-term maintenance set forth in the application for a wetland permit, with approved amendments. 4) A provision identifying the officer of the association responsible for carrying out the obligations imposed upon the association under this Ordinance. 5) A provision requiring the consent of the City to any amendment of the bylaws changing any of the provisions of the bylaws required by this Ordinance. 6) A provision requiring the consent of the City to the dissolution of the association. d. Any conveyance or other instrument of transfer delivered under Section 5.1(b) shall include a covenant that imposes upon the association the obligations set forth in this section and the association's affirmative acceptance thereof. Section 5.4 Conveyance to One or More Persons 1. If any portion of the preserved and mitigation wetlands and their associated buffers are to be conveyed to one or more persons under Section 5.1(c), then: a. Appropriate easements for ingress and egress and maintenance of such portions shall be reserved for the benefit of the City on the final plat. 26 • b. The final plat shall contain a legend imposing the maintenance obligations of this section upon the grantee and his successors in interest as a covenant running with the land and incorporating by reference the plan of long-term maintenance set forth in the application for a wetland permit, with approved amendments. c. The final plat shall contain a legend reserving the right of the City to enter upon the land to perform the maintenance required in this section if the owner does not do so and to place a lien against the land for the cost thereof. d. Any conveyance delivered under Section 5.1(c), and any subsequent conveyance, shall include a covenant that imposes upon the grantee the obligations, restrictions and provisions set forth in this section and the grantee's affirmative acceptance thereof. Section 5.5 Incorporation of Maintenance Obligations in Wetland Permit 1. The provisions of this section shall be incorporated by reference in the wetland permit and the applicant's acceptance of the permit shall be deemed to be the annlirant'c acceptance and assumption of the obligations imposed under this sectioi Rationale for application shall record such obligations on the deed. fee is to help coveradditional admin costs. Rationale for escrow fee is to have some funding up Article 6 Fees, Enforcement, and Penalties front for review costs, etc. All of the area counties that have a wetland ord. have Section 6.1 Fees fees. Applications for a wetland permit under this Ordinance shall be accompanied by a non- refundable administrative application fee in an amount specified from time to time by resolution of the United City of Yorkville City Council. In addition, an applicant shall pay an additional escrow fee in an amount determined by resolution of the United City of Yorkville City Council for the estimated cost of outside consultant(s) who may be retained by the United City of Yorkville in connection with the review of the application. In the event the cost of the services of the consultant(s) is less than the escrow fee, the applicant shall be refunded the balance. In the event the cost of the services of the consultant(s) exceeds the amount of the escrow fee, the applicant shall pay the deficiency to the United City of Yorkville prior to issuance of the wetland permit. A denial of an application for a wetland permit shall not affect the applicant's obligation to pay the escrow fee provided for in this Section. Section 6.2 Enforcement One of the primary duties of the Administrator or his/her agent shall be the review of all wetland submittal applications and issuance of wetland permits for those projects that are in compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance. The Administrator shall be responsible for the administration and enforcement of this Ordinance. The Administrator or his/her agent, officer, or employee shall have authority under this Ordinance to enter upon privately owned property within the limits of the United City of Yorkville or for any area under consideration for annexation into the United City of Yorkville for the purposes of inspecting any development activity to ensure the activity conforms with 27 requirements, standards, and provisions of this Ordinance and/or the terms and conditions of an issued wetland permit. If a wetland mitigation area is constructed as part of the wetland permit, the Administrator or his/her agent shall at a minimum perform the following inspections: • After final grading and before seeding or plant installation. • After seeding and plant installation. • Annual inspections during the 5-year monitoring and maintenance period. Section 6.3 Penalties and Legal Actions 1. Whenever the Administrator or his/her agent finds a violation of this Ordinance, or of any permit or order issued pursuant thereto, the Administrator or City Council, as applicable, may issue a stop-work order on all development activity on the subject property or on the portion of the activity in direct violation of the Ordinance or withhold issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, permits or inspection until the provisions of this Ordinance, including any conditions attached to a wetland permit, have been fully met. The Administrator shall issue an order that (1) describes the violation (2) specifies the time period for remediation, and (3) requires compliance with this Ordinance prior to the completion of the activity in violation. Failure to obey a stop-work order shall constitute a violation of this Ordinance. 2. In the event a violation involving illegal alteration of an Isolated Waters of Yorkville as protected under this Ordinance, the City shall have the power to order complete restoration of the Isolated Waters of Yorkville by the person or agentresponsible for the violation. If such responsible person or agent does not complete such restoration within a reasonable time following the order, the City shall have the authority to restore the affected Isolated Waters of Yorkville to their prior condition wherever possible, and the person or agent responsible for the original violation shall be held liable to the City for the cost of such restoration. 3. In addition to the rights and remedies herein provided to the City, any person violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be subject to a fine in an amount not exceeding Seven Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($750.00) for each offense. Each calendar day a violation continues to exist shall constitute a separate offense. 4. Any activity conducted in violation of this Ordinance is declared to be a nuisance per se, and the City may commence a civil suit in any court of competent jurisdiction for an order abating or enjoining the violation, and/or requiring restoration of the Isolated Waters of Yorkville as nearly as possible to its condition before the violation. Article 7 General Provisions Section 7.1 Scope of Regulation 1. This Ordinance applies to all new development as well as any dumping or non- permitted discharge of chemicals or other pollutants into Isolated Waters of Yorkville within the United City of Yorkville and all new development within an area under consideration for annexation into the United City of Yorkville. Any person undertaking a development having 28 a wetland on the project site or a wetland within 100 feet of the project site shall obtain a wetland permit from the Administrator. This includes any new development on partially developed sites. Section 7.2 Exemptions 1. This ordinance does not apply to: a. Development which has preliminary plat approval before the effective date of this Ordinance. b. Wetland impacts that have occurred before the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 7.3 Severability 1. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be severable in accordance with the following rules: a. If any court of competent jurisdiction shall adjudge any provision of this ordinance to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect any other provision of this Ordinance. b. If any court of competent jurisdiction shall adjudge to be invalid the application of any provision of this Ordinance to a particular parcel of land or a particular development, such judgment shall not affect the application of said provision to any other land or development. Section 7.4Abrogation and Greater Restrictions 1. This Ordinance is not intended to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. Where this Ordinance and other ordinances, easements, covenants, or deed restrictions conflict or overlap, whichever imposes the more stringent restrictions shall prevail. 2. When provisions of this Ordinance differ from any other applicable law, statute, ordinance, rule, or regulation, the more stringent provision shall apply. Section 7.5 Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effective from and after its passage, approval, and publication according to law. The effective date of this Ordinance is , 20_. Sections that discuss the variance Article 8 Variances and Appeals process were deleted.The section for appeals was changed to reflect Section 8.1Variances similar language to the Soil Erosion Ord. 1. Whenever the standards and requirements of this Ordinance place undue and particular hardship on a specific development proposal, the applicant may apply to the City Council for a variance. The City Council shall have the authority to grant variances from the requirements of this Ordinance, but only in compliance with the procedures set forth in this Section 8.1. 29 2. The petition for a variance shall accompany or follow an application for a Wetland Permit including all necessary submittal items. 3. Every variance petition filed pursuant to this Section 8.1 shall provide the following information: a. The specific feature or features of the proposed construction or development that require a variance. b. The specific provision(s) of this Ordinance from which a variance is sought and the precise extent of the variance therefrom. c. A statement of the characteristics of the development that prevent compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance. d. A statement that the variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to permit the development. e. A statement as to how the variance requested satisfies the standards set forth in Section 8.1.4 of this Ordinance. 4. The City Council may grant such petition for a variance only when it is consistent with the general purpose and intent of this Ordinance and when the development meets the following conditions: a. The relief requested is the minimum necessary and there are no means other than the requested variance by which the alleged hardship can be avoided or remedied to a degree sufficient to permit the reasonable continuation of the development. b. Demonstration that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant. c. The variance is not requested solely for the purpose of increasing the density of the development nor impervious areas on the site. d. The applicant's circumstances are unique and do not represent a general condition or problem. e. The subject development is exceptional as compared to other developments subject to the same provision. f. Granting the variance shall not alter the essential character of the area involved, including existing stream uses. g. The proposed development could not be constructed if it were limited to areas outside the Isolated Waters of Yorkville and required buffer areas. 5. No variance shall be granted for any provision of this Ordinance which would create regulation less restrictive or stringent than federal and/or state required minimum standards for development in such areas. 30 Section 8.2 Conditions 1. A variance of less than or different from that requested may be granted when the record supports the applicant's right to some relief, but not to the relief requested. 2. In granting a variance, the City Council may impose such specific conditions and limitations on the applicant concerning any matter relating to the purposes and objectives of this Ordinance as may be necessary or appropriate. 3. Whenever any variance is granted subject to any condition to be met by the applicant, upon meeting such condition, the applicant shall file evidence to that effect with the Administrator. Section 8.3 Appeals 1. Any applicant may appeal any decision of the Administrator to the City Council provided that no such appeal shall be taken until and unless the applicant has requested a conference with the Administrator and the ordinance reviewer(s), not a subordinate of the Administrator, and either the conference has been held or the Administrator has not scheduled a conference within 30 days of the initial request. Article 9 Administration Section 9.1 Responsibility for Administration 1. The Administrator shall oversee the enforcement and administration of this Ordinance. In performing his/her duties, the Administrator may delegate routine responsibilities to any named designee. Section 9.2 Representative Capacity 1. In all cases when any action is taken by the Administrator or his/her duly appointed designee, to enforce the provisions of this Ordinance, such action shall be taken in the name of the City, and neither the Administrator nor his/her designee, in so acting shall be rendered personally liable. Section 9.3 Service of Notice 1. Unless otherwise provided herein, service of any notice or other instrument under this Ordinance may be made upon any person by: a. First class mail, postage prepaid, addressed to address then on file for such person, if any, or if none, to such person's last known address. b. Any method prescribed under the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure. Section 9.4 Publication 31 Unless otherwise provided herein, publication of any notice or other instrument under this ordinance shall be made by publishing such notice or other instrument once in a newspaper published within the City (or, if no newspaper is published within the City, then a newspaper published in Kendall County and having a general circulation within the City), such publication being not less than 15 nor more than 30 days before the hearing or other event to which the publication relates. Article 10 Performance Security Section 10.1 General Security Requirements 1. To secure the performance of the developer's obligation to successfully complete any required wetland mitigation as part of the wetland permit, and to pay all costs, fees, and charges due under this Ordinance, and to fully and faithfully comply with all of the provisions of this Ordinance, the applicant shall, prior to the issuance of a wetland permit post the security as provided in Section 10.2. 2. The applicant shall bear the full cost and responsibility of obtaining and maintaining the security required by this Article. Section 10.2 Wetland Mitigation and Performance Security 1. A development security shall be posted and shall include the following. a. A schedule, agreed upon by the developer and the Administrator, for the completion of the wetland mitigation required by the permit. b. A statement of the estimated probable cost to install, monitor, and maintain the wetland mitigation area as required by the permit. Such estimate is subject to approval by the Administrator. c. An irrevocable letter of credit in favor of the City or such other adequate security as the Administrator may approve, in an amount equal to 110% of the approved estimated probable cost to complete any required wetland mitigation. d. A statement signed by the applicant granting the Administrator the right to draw on the security and the right to enter the development site to complete required work, in the event that work is not completed according to the work schedule or the mitigation area is not meeting the required performance standards and the applicant has failed to implement management activities or remedial measures to address incompliance issues. 2. The security required by this section shall be maintained by the applicant in favor of the City until all wetland mitigation required by the permit has been completed including vegetation establishment, all conditions set forth in the permit have been satisfied and the applicant has complied with all of the provisions of this Ordinance. 3. The Administrator may approve periodic reductions in the amount of the security based upon the progress of the mitigation. At no time, however, shall more than 75% of the 32 security be released prior to approval of the as-builts and final inspection by the Administrator. A minimum of twenty-five percent (25%) of the security shall be retained for a period of time not to exceed five years after completion of construction and planting of the wetland mitigation area(s) and found to meet the performance standards of Section 4.2.2. Section 10.3 Letters of Credit 1. Letters of credit posted pursuant to this Article shall be in a form satisfactory to the Administrator. 2. Each letter of credit shall be drawn on an institution (1) acceptable to the Administrator; (2) having assets of at least $10 million; (3) having an office in the Chicago metropolitan area; and (4) that is a member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 3. Each letter of credit shall provide the following. a. The letter of credit is irrevocable. b. The consent of the applicant is not required prior to any draw on it by the Administrator. c. If at any time it will expire within 45 days or less, and if it has not been renewed and the renewal submitted to the Administrator, and if any obligation of the applicant for which it stands as security remains uncompleted or is unsatisfactory, then the Administrator may, without notice and without being required to take any further action of any nature whatsoever, present the letter of credit for payment and thereafter either hold all proceeds as security for the satisfactory completion of all such obligations or employ the proceeds to complete all such obligations and reimburse the City for any and all costs and expenses, including legal fees and administrative costs, incurred by the City. 4. If the Administrator at any time determines that the amount of the letter of credit is not, or may not be, sufficient to pay in full the remaining unpaid cost of the wetland mitigation, then, within 10 days following a demand by the Administrator, the applicant shall increase the amount of the letter of credit to the amount determined by the Administrator to be sufficient to pay such unpaid costs. Failure to increase the amount of the letter of credit shall be grounds for the Administrator to present the letter of credit for payment. 5. If at any time the Administrator determines that the bank issuing the letter of credit is without assets of at least $10 million, is unable to meet any federal or state requirement for reserves, is insolvent, is in danger of becoming any of the foregoing, or is otherwise in danger of being unable to honor such letter of credit at any time during its term, then the Administrator shall have the right to demand that the applicant provide a replacement letter of credit from a bank meeting the requirements of this Article. Such replacement letter of credit shall be deposited with the Administrator not more than 10 days following such demand. Upon such deposit, the Administrator shall surrender the original letter of credit to the applicant. 6. If the applicant fails or refuses to fully meet any of its obligations under this Ordinance then the Administrator may, in his/her discretion, present the letter for payment and thereafter either hold all proceeds as security for the satisfactory completion of all such 33 obligations or employ the proceeds to complete such obligations or otherwise mitigate the effects of such failure or refusal and may reimburse the City for any and all costs and expenses, including legal fees and administrative costs, incurred by the City. If as a result of such default, the remaining amount of the letter of credit is less than the amount otherwise required to be then maintained under this Article, then the applicant shall, upon demand of the Administrator, immediately deposit with the Administrator such additional funds as the Administrator determines to be required to be then maintained. Article 11 Fee-In-Lieu of Wetland Mitigation Section 11.1 Fee-in-lieu of Wetland Mitigation If wetland mitigation is required under this Ordinance and the amount of wetland impact to Isolated Waters of Yorkville is equal to or less than 0.5 acre, the applicant may request to satisfy the mitigation requirement by paying a fee-in-lieu of mitigation. In order to meet the requirements of this Article, the applicant shall prepare a statement of the estimated probable cost to acquire the land, construct, monitor, and maintain a wetland mitigation area for five years as if the applicant had chosen to satisfy the mitigation requirement by mitigating off-site, but within the same watershed as the wetland impact and therefore meeting the requirements of Section 4.2.1 of this Ordinance. The estimate of probable costs is subject to the approval of the Administrator. Section 11.2 Procedures and Use of Funds 1. An applicants' statement of its intention to satisfy the wetland mitigation requirement by the payment of a fee-in-lieu of wetland mitigation shall be in writing and filed with the Administrator along with the estimates described in Section 11.1. 2. Fees paid in lieu of wetland mitigation shall be deposited by the City in a separate fund created for such purpose. Provisions shall be made so that all receipts and disbursements of such funds may be accounted for according to the individual watershed. 3. Fees paid in lieu of wetland mitigation shall be expended to plan, design, restore, improve, acquire, or enhance Waters of the U.S. and/or Isolated Waters of Yorkville located within the City's jurisdiction. • 34 J ..E ai, United City of Yorkville ESL ". 1836 County Seat of Kendall County Rose Spears 800 Game Farm Road Alderman Ward 4 Yorkville, IL 60560 •._...a `� Phone: 630-553-4350, ext. 6002 494LE `w Fax: 630-553-7575 DATE: October 4, 2002 TO: Larry Kot FROM: Rose Spears RE: Street Name Nominees On October 3, 2002, the following individuals have been reviewed and recommended by the Human Resources Commission for consideration to have streets named after them in accordance with the United City of Yorkville's policy. Identa Austin Joyce Barrett Jo Anne Behrens Tom Cross Gerald Dalton *J. Dennis Hastert *Dwayne (Bud) Hayden Dallas Ingemunson Elden Madden *John Marshall Richard Undesser I have attached a copy of the completed nominating form and specifics for each of the recommended nominees in order for the Public Works Committee to review. Names denoted with an asterisk indicate additional, specific documentation is currently being compiled. Upon completion, I will forward copies to you for review by the Public Works Committee. We are currently developing a routing form for each of the nominees in order to keep an accurate record of the nominees being reviewed by the Human Resources Commission, Public Works Committee, City Council, City Engineer, KenCom and the U.S. Post Office to avoid duplication. This form should be finalized by the end of next week. I will provide you with copies for each of the above-listed nominees. Please do not forward the names to the City Engineer, Ken Com or the'U:S.Post Office until the form is attached. It will avoid confusion. If you have any questions, please call me. �odsL. �0o ctrl R o *` ‘, -r` United City of Yorkville EST iii Intl 1836 County Seat of Kendall County Rose Spears 800 Game Farm Road .c of ft Alderman Ward 4 p t � � Yorkville,.IL 60560 t7li -`j Phone: 630-553-4350, ext. 6002 4(E `‘.- Fax: 630-553-7575 DATE: November 11, 2002 TO: Larry Kot FROM: Rose Spears RE: Street Name Nominees On November 7, 2002, the following individuals have been reviewed and recommended by the Human Resources Commission for consideration to have streets named after them in accordance with the United City of Yorkville's policy. J. Dennis Hastert Jeaness and Curt Medin I have attached a copy of the completed nominating form and specifics for each of the above- listed, recommended nominees in order for review and/or approval by the Public Works Committee. Also attached is a draft routing form letter for the nominees being reviewed by the Human Resources Commission, Public Works Committee, City Council, City Engineer, KenCom and the U.S. Post Office. Hopefully, duplication of street names will be avoided if these procedures are followed. IAlso attached is a letter the Committee on Street Names (Rose Kahle and Elden Madden) will mail to individulls that are nominated. If you have any questions, please call me.