Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Public Works Packet 2003 02-24-03
: .° cis.` 0 United City of Yorkville ° , County Seat of Kendall County EST. -.N. 1836 800 Game Farm Road ,� Cl) Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Q Q Phone:630-553-4350 S. Fax:630-553-7575 k L E ‘‘'' PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Monday, February 24, 2003 6:30 PM City Hall Conference Room Approval/Correction of Minutes: December 23, 2002 Presentations: None New Business: 1. 2003 Joint & Crack Filling 2. Fox Industrial Park - Final Balancing Change 3. Supplemental Truck Purchase 4. PW Time Studies 5. Menard Commercial Commons Bond Reduction Old Business: 1. Wetland Protection Ordinance 2. Fox Hill - 1728 John Street 3. Sanitary System Overview 4. Yorkville Road Program Update - Smith Engineering Additional Business: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE To: Tony Graff, City Administrator From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Subject: 2003 Joint & Crack Filling Date: February 12, 2003 Attached find one copy each of the proposed MFT appropriation resolution, location map, and cost estimate for the referenced project. The estimated project cost is $26,682.60. Crack filling is an annual maintenance project that helps keep water out of the pavement and weeds from growing at the curbline. Last year was the first year that we had an actual project dedicated for this work. Prior to then we either added this work on to a street project (which resulted in higher costs due to general contractor mark-up) or relied on the county to do spot crack filling in isolated areas. With our growth adding miles of streets every year, it is important to keep our streets in good condition for as long as possible. Crack filling is one way can do that. The streets I am proposing to crack fill this year are in the White Oak and Blackberry North subdivisions. We were planning to get White Oak done last year, but that work was cancelled due to budget concerns. Both of these subdivisions received Reclamite surface treatment last year, and following up with crack filling will complete our programmed maintenance efforts in these areas and allow us to move on to other areas next year. This year we are proposing to use MFT funds to pay for this work. This will free up general funds for other projects where we might not want to strictly follow IDOT guidelines. Please place this item on the Public Works Committee agenda of February 24, 2003 for consideration. Cc: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Traci Pleckham, Director of Finance 'L_ Illinois Department Resolution for Maintenance of Streets and Highways by Municipality of Transportation Under the Illinois Highway Code BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the (Council or President and Board of Trustees) United City of Yorkville , Illinois, that there is hereby (City,Town or Village) (Name) appropriated the sum of $26,682.60 of Motor Fuel Tax funds for the purpose of maintaining streets and highways under the applicable provisions of the Illinois Highway Code from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that only those streets, highways, and operations as listed and described on the approved Municipal Estimate of Maintenance Costs, including supplemental or revised estimates approved in connection with this resolution, are eligible for maintenance with Motor Fuel Tax funds during the period as specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall, as soon a practicable after the close of the period as given above, submit to the Department of Transportation, on forms furnished by said Department , a certified statement showing expenditures from and balances remaining in the account(s) for this period; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall immediately transmit two certified copies of this resolution to the district office of the Department of Transportation, at Ottawa , Illinois. I, Jacquelyn Milschewski Clerk in and for the United City (City,Town or Village) of Yorkville , County of Kendall hereby certify the foregoing to be a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by the City Council at a meeting on March 11, 2003 (Council or President and Board of Trustees) Date IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this day of (SEAL) City Clerk (City,Town or Village) APPROVED Date Department of Transportation District Engineer BLR 4123(Rev.6/2000) I r © 711 A Il giiiiiiiiiglirelD . __ 4, -1 ),p PPP 1111 20 1 11pU �I itqr 1 P.N.A. is wr.:_di pir _i_j_tcp ..„,‘ ...,1,, c , 0 nr__. . ;i c ? .. E::: ,r 11%) ,11,747 g 29)- in ml 11 28 is.:...A4 ir' Youth / - Camp � la Q cHEDLI/ 1l _ IGH SCFi00L � ,-� � g �I [ CIL O 1 111.101---- 11611".. EVIdliMMIA __ �� A:: - - -11:1174Mg1"1"."1"11111144116111 liii ON _____ , , _IFS ft Ilialinaja Fox talftethi 11) ' :::DRiver S v' pa]om®D animmralli---&---- 1".4 ■r 1"=2000' / Id11( LI bithe ,-' litilirrni 2003 CRACK FILLING PROGRAM LOCATION MAP LEGEND AREO IDENTIFIER ilk STREET t- LOCATION Illinois Department Municipal Estimate of of Transportation Maintenance Costs Period from 05/01/2003 to 04/30/2004- Municipality Yorkville Estimated Cost of Maintenance Operations Material. Eauioment or Labor Maintenance Operation Quantity Unit Operation (No.-Description-Total Quantity) Item and Specification and Unit Cost Cost Cost Joint & Crack Fillina Crack Fillina - Section 451 25412 LB 1.05 26682.60 26.682.60 • 4 Total Estimated Maintenance Cost $26,682.60 Submitted 02/12/2003 Approved By \, � City Engineer Municipal'pfficial Title District Engineer JJ J Submit Four (4) Copies to District Engineer BLR 8202(Rev.7/01) Crackfilling Calculation Spreadsheet 2003 Crack & Joint Filling Section No. 03-00000-00-GM Area ID Number 1 2 Area/Subdivision: Blackberry North White Oak Total Total Pavement Area (SY): 15550 28664 44214 Total Centerline Distance of Streets (FT): 4500 11900 16400 Average crackfill weight per SY of pvmt (LB): 0.3 0.3 0.3 Average length of crack per pound of crackfill (FT): 2.7 2.7 2.7 Total length crack routing (FT): 21596 47018 68613 Crackfill quantity- random cracks (LBS): 4665 8599 13264 Crackfill quantity - EOP sealing (LBS): 3333 8815 12148 Total crackfill quantity (LBS): 7998 17414 25412 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE Memo To: Public Works Committee From: Tony Graff, ' dministrator CC: Joe Wywrot, Eric Dhuse, and Traci Pleckham Date: 2/17/03 Re: Proposed Crack Filling Project for FY03/04 I have reviewed Engineer Wywrot's request for the 2003 Joint Crack Filling project for FY03/04. This project was recommended for the FY03/04 proposed budget to be included within the MFT Fund. I believe this type of maintenance project enhancing the capital street project. Furthermore, the RFP should be prepared to be announced in May, so the project can be completed immediately since we do not have to wait for the reclamite surface treatment. --__ —_.---- __--------_—_-_-- /i., ROUTING SLIP To: DATE: 2J/VL)_3 El Mayor 0 Liz El Joe El Harold O Eric CTEaura Jackie 0 Council: From: Tony Graff El FYI Action Needed: fleA--.,/ C.,,,'� L1 L /'`', ,L.,',, ° '' /4_ t //e 7Ater ,,, L t; /475, CC�r ,�v t E , 7-c,cr / 2i UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE To: Tony Graff, City Administrator From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer -, 7-----Subject: Fox Industrial Park-Final Balancing ge Order Date: February 11, 2003 Attached find a copy of the proposed final balancing change order for last year's Fox Industrial Park project. The change order is in the amount of a $42,659.98 decrease. Most of the pay items only had minor differences between the awarded and final quantities, and there is nothing unusual about that. There were several pay items, however, that experienced significant changes (in excess of$5,000) that require some explanation. These are as follows: Combination Curb & Gutter- A$9855.51 increase resulted from replacing more curbing at various locations throughout the industrial park. A significant amount of this additional curb was placed on Badger Street, where we had three property owners pay to have their mountable curb replaced with depressed curb. There was also some curb on Badger that we replaced after re-evaluating its condition. Earth Excavation-A $16,155.10 decrease was due to better soil conditions than anticipated on Deer Street south of Beaver. We didn't have to replace as much of the support soil as we thought we would. Porous Granular Embankment -A $27,955.65 decrease was also due to the better soil conditions on Deer Street. Bituminous Drive Repair-A $5,997.60 increase was due to replacing more driveway area than anticipated. In some of these areas the property owners paid for this work, but most of the increase was due to increasing the area of repair where driveways were in poor condition or damaged during construction. Bituminous Binder Course- A $5,607.76 decrease resulted from overestimating the quantity needed when the plans were prepared. Bituminous Surface Course- A$6,028,60 decrease resulted from overestimating the quantity needed when the plans were prepared. Please place this change order on the Public Works Committee agenda of February 24, 2003 for consideration. ' . UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE Fox Industrial Park Roadway Improvements . MFT Section No.00-00023-00-FP Change Order No. 2(FINAL) Aurora Blacktop Inc Date: 12-Feb-03 1065 Sard Ave. Montgomery,IL 60538 Awarded Final Difference in No. Item Quantity Quantity Difference Unit Unit Price Cost 1 BIT.SURFACE REMOVAL,6" 5193 5202 9 SQ YD $3.15 $28.35 • 2 PCC PAVEMENT REMOVAL 72 63 -9 SQ YD $6.50 ($58.50) 3 BIT.SURFACE REMOVAL,PARTIAL 1423 1475 52 SQ YD $2.70 $140.40 • 4 COMB.CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL 1523 1997 474 FT $4.75 $2,251.50 5 COMB.CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER,TM6.12 1553 2170.9 617.9 FT $15.95 $9,855.51 6 CONCRETE CURB REM&REPL,TY B,6" 50 0 -50 FT $20.00 ($1,000.00) 7 EARTH EXCAVATION 4200 3082 -1118 CU YD $14.45 ($16,155.10) 8 GEOTECH.FABRIC FOR GROUND STABILIZATION 4300 5187 887 SQ YD $1.20 $1,064.40 9 POROUS GRANULAR EMBANKMENT 5625 3172.75 -2452.25 TON $11.40 ($27,955.65) 10 PREPARATION OF BASE 8966 3861 -5105 SQ YD $0.35 ($1,786.75) 11 MANHOLES TO BE ADJUSTED 8 6 -2 EA $535.00 ($1,070.00) 12 INLETS TO BE ADJUSTED 6 6 0 EA $330.00 $0.00 13 STORM SEWERS,TY 1,RCP,CL4,12" 548 525 -23 FT $15.75 ($362.25) 14 STORM SEWERS,TY 1,RCP,CL 4,15" 43 40 -3 FT $17.30 ($51.90) 15 STORM SEWERS,TY 2,RCP,CL 3,18" 169 168 -1 FT $8.40 ($8.40) 16 STORM SEWERS,TY 1,RCP,CL 4,21" 40 33 -7 FT $23.10 ($161.70) 17 STORM SEWERS,TY 2,RCP,CL 3,21" 517 502 -15 FT $22.60 ($339.00) 18 STORM SEWERS,TY 1,RCP,CL 4,24" 105 104 .-1 FT $26.25 ($26.25) 19 STORM SEWERS,TY 2,RCP,CL 3,24" 881 858 -23 FT $25.20 ($579.60) 20 STORM SEWERS,TY 1,RCP,CL 3,30" 169 160 -9 FT $33.60 ($302.40) 21 MANHOLE TY A,5'DIA,TIFCL 8 8 0 EA $2,475.00 $0.00 22 RD MANHOLES,5'DIA,T1 F CL 7 7 0 EA $2,165.00 $0.00 23 RD MANHOLES,6'DIA,T1 F CL 3 3 0 EA $3,195.00 $0.00 24 CATCH BASIN,TYA 2 2 0 EA $1,805.00 $0.00 25 CATCH BASIN,TY C 7 7 0 EA $840.00 $0.00 26 INLET,TV A 7 7 0 EA $790.00 $0.00 27 INLET,TY B 2 2 0 EA $945.00 $0.00 28 PRC FLARED END SECTION,30" 2 2 0 EA $1,680.00 $0.00 29 PRC FLARED END SECTION,15" 1 1 0 EA $550.00 $0.00 30 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 1216 1198 -18 FT $5.50 ($99.00) 31 REMOVING MANHOLES 10 10 0 EA $1,050.00 $0.00 32 REMOVING INLETS 4 4 0 EA $550.00 $0.00 33 FRAMES AND GRATES,SPECIAL 3 3 0 EA $385.00 $0.00 34 ADJUSTING WATER SERVICE LINES 40 0 -40 FT $16.50 ($660.00) 35 ADJUSTING SANITARY SEWERS 40 12 -28 FT $16.50 ($462.00) 36 TRENCH BACKFILL 979 820 -159 CU YD $12.60 ($2,003.40) 37 STONE RIPRAP,CL A2 47 66 19 SQ YD $60.00 $1,140.00 38 AGGREGATE DRIVE REPAIR 34 15.65 -18.35 TON $20.00 ($367.00) 39 BIT.DRIVE REPAIR 1131 1572 441 SQ YD $13.60 $5,997.60 40 PCC DRIVE REPAIR 201 206.4 5.4 SQ YD $45.90 $247.86 41 BUTT JOINT 259 274 15 FT $3.50 $52.50 42 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE,TY B,4" 3753 5169 1416 SQ YD $2.20 $3,115.20 43 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS(PRIME COAT) 2230 225.92 -2004.08 GAL $1.45 ($2,905.92) 44 AGGREGATE PRIME COAT 18 0 -18 TON $20.00 ($360.00) 45 BIT. CONC.BINDER CSE.,CLASS I,MIX 0,TY 2 2062 1878.44 -183.56 TON $30.55 ($5,607.76) 46 BIT.CONC.SURFACE CSE.,CLASS I,MIX C,TY 2 1321 1141.31 -179.69 TON $33.55 ($6,028.60) 47 OC/QA BITUMINOUS 3383 2990.68 -392.32 TON $1.80 ($706.18) 48 CONSTRUCTING TEST STRIP 2 0 -2 EA $1,500.00 ($3,000.00) 49 GUTTER OVERLAY REMOVAL 10 0 -10 FT $15.00 ($150.00) 50 JOINT OR CRACK ROUTING 1736 38 -1698 FT $0.30 ($509.40) 51 JOINT OR CRACK FILLING 9594 9612 18 FT $0.55 $9.90 , 52 THPL PVT MK LINE 12 27 57 30 FT $10.00 $300.00 53 THPL PVT MK LINE 4 960 960 0 FT $2.00 $0.00 54 TEMP.AGGREGATE FOR DRIVEWAYS 300 256.28 -43.72 TON $20.00 ($874.40) 55 BLOCK RETAINING WALL 1 1 0 L SUM $4,000.00 $0.00 56 TREE REMOVAL 1 1 0 L SUM $1,650.00 $0.00 57 FURNISHING AND PLACING TOPSOIL,6" 4381 5988 1607 SQ YD $2.30 $3,696.10 58 SEEDING,CLASS 1A 4381 5988 1607 SQ YO $0.60 $964.20 59 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 4381 5988 1607 SQ YD $1.15 $1,848.05 60 TREES,KENTUCKY COFFEETREE,3"CAL. 8 8 0 EA $550.00 $0.00 61 TREES,SUGAR MAPLE,3"CAL. 5 5 0 EA $550.00 $0.00 62 TREES,AMERICAN LINDEN,3"CAL. 3 3 0 EA $550.00 $0.00 63 TREES,RED MAPLE,3"CAL. 4 4 0 EA $550.00 $0.00 64 TREES,RED OAK,3"CAL. 3 3 0 EA $550.00 $0.00 65 TREES,WHITE OAK,3"CAL. 3 3 0 EA $550.00 $0.00 66 TREES,WHITE ASH,3"CAL. 3 3 0 EA $550.00 $0.00 67 TREES,NORWAY MAPLE,3"CAL. 2 2 0 EA $550.00 $0.00 68 TREES,TULIP,3"CAL. 1 1 0 EA $550.00 $0.00 69 REMOVAL OF EXISTING LIGHTING UNIT,SALVAGE 1 1 0 EA $515.00 $0.00 70 STREET LIGHT POLE INSTALLATION 14 14 0 EA $1,785.00 $0.00 71 CONDUIT PUSHED,2"DIA,GALV.STEEL 345 415 70 FT $14.70 $1,029.00 72 CONDUIT IN TRENCH,2"DIA,GALV.STEEL 281 234 -47 FT $7.70 ($361.90) 73 TRENCH&BACKFILL FOR ELECTRICAL WORK 1853 1759 -94 FT $2.75 ($258.50) 74 UNIT DUCT,3#6XLP,1"POLYETHYLENE 2345 2282 -63 FT $3.00 ($189.00) 75 ELECTRIC SERVICE INSTALLATION,TV C 8 8 0 EA $875.00 $0.00 76 SIGN PANEL,TY 1 39 39 0 SQ FT $15.00 $0.00 77 METAL POST ASSEMBLY 11 11 0 EA $170.00 $0.00 78 TRAFFIC CONTROL&PROTECTION 1 1 0 L SUM $5,500.00 $0.00 Total change: 042.6St58) Contract Award Amount: $618,866.35 Plus Previous Change Orders: $0_40 Revised Contract Amount: $576,206.37 C Recommend for A royal: `d• ' _ Date: ' I'"1 j /____ . Al • off orkville I Approved: /�" ' Date: �//a/G3 Aurora Blacktop,Inc. Approved: Date: City of Yorkville United City of Yorkville Public Works Department Water Department Maintenance Plan and Standards Goals Maintaining a municipal water system, which provides the citizens of Yorkville with clean, safe drinking water and adequate water for fire protection. Complying with all Federal and State Environmental Protection Agency rules and regulations. Purpose • Scheduling- identifying recurring and non-recurring work • Monitor work functions and data collection • Preview future schedules • Determine frequency of maintenance • Determine personnel standards and levels • Determine growth impacts on maintenance • Determine cost impacts for maintenance and expansion Classification of Maintenance • Housekeeping - General cleaning in the shop and office areas. For example, sweeping, mopping, scrubbing, emptying garbage cans, and washing vehicles. • Routine Maintenance - daily well monitoring, installation of outside readers, acting on problem response forms, and similar recurring maintenance activities. • Preventative Maintenance— (includes periodic inspections to prevent breakdown)- trucks, backhoe, pumps, power tools, and other equipment used by the water department • City Programs— assisting other departments in the preparation for city sponsored events. • Scheduled Improvements—flushing hydrants, exercising valves, main and service installations, hydrant replacement, and large equipment repairs and replacements. • Emergency Repairs—usually due to weather, misuse, or other unpredictable occurrences. • Other—items that do not fit into one of the identified categories. Water Maintenance Identification 10-Water Main Maintenance 10-01 Main Break Repair 10-02 New Installation 10-03 Contractor Assistance 10-04 Other 20- Water Service Maintenance 20-01 Raise/Lower B Boxes 20-02 Locate Service 20-03 Leak Repair 20-04 Service Tap 20-05 Other 30- Samples and Testing 30-01 Monthly Samples 30-02 New Construction Samples 30-03 Boil Order Samples 30-04 Other Samples 40- Well Maintenance 40-01 Daily Check 40-02 Booster Station Check 40-03 Monthly Well Data Reports 40-04 Draw Downs 40-05 Emergency Repair 40-06 Annual Check 50- Hydrant and Valve Maintenance 50-01 Hydrant Repair 50-02 Hydrant Replacement 50-03 Hydrant Flushing 50-04 Valve Repair 50-05 Valve Replacement 50-06 Valve Operation 60- Customer Service 60-01 Service Call 60-02 Meter Repair 60-03 Meter Installation 60-04 Meter Reading 60-05 Customer Questions 70- Cross Department Support 70-01 City Events 70-02 Street Support 70-03 Sewer Support 70-04 Park Support 70-05 Police 70-06 Non-City 70-07 Administration 70-08 City Council 70-09 Other 80- Administration and Training 80-01 In House Training 80-02 In House Workshop 80-03 Off Sit Local Training 80-04 Off Site Regional Training 80-05 Off Site Sate Conferences 80-06 Staff Meetings 80-07 City Meetings 80-08 Educational 90- Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance 90-01 Routine Vehicle Maintenance 90-02 Routine Equipment Maintenance 90-03 Major Vehicle Maintenance 90-04 Major Equipment Maintenance 100- Time Off 100-01 Vacation 100-02 Sick Leave 100-03 Holiday 100-04 Compensation Time 100-05 Overtime 100-06 Other 110- Office/Prep 110-01 Data Entry 110-02 Coding Bills 110-03 Research 110-04 Correspondence 110-05 Cleaning Water Maintenance Hours ID Number Description Daily Weekly Monthly Annually As Needed Total Water Main Maintenance 1001 Main Break Repairs 55 480 * 1002 New Installation 0 0 1003 Contractor Assistance 240 240 1004 Other 0 category total 720 Water Service Maintenance 2001 Raise/Lower B-Boxes 2 104 2002 Locate Service/b-box 4 48 * 2003 Leak Repair 120 120 2004 Service Tap 12 12 2005 Other category total 284 Samples and Testing 3001 Monthly Samples _ 6 72 3002 New Construction Samples 255.5 255.5 * 3003 Boil Order Samples 16 16 3004 Others category total 343.5 Well Maintenance 4001 Daily Check 1 260 * 4002 Booster Station Check 0.25 65 * 4003 Monthly Well Data Reports 2 24 4004 Draw Downs 16 16 4005 Emergency Repair 16 16 4006 Annual Check 40 40 category total 421 Water Maintenance Hours ID Number Description Daily Weekly Monthly Annually As Needed Total Hydrant and Valve Maintenance 5001 Hydrant Repair 16 16 5002 Hydrant Replacement 16 16 * 5003 Hydrant Flushing 160 160 5004 Valve Repair 5005 Valve Replacement 5006 Valve Operation 160 160 * category total 352 Water Maintenance Hours Customer Service 6001 Service Calls 1.5 390 6002 Meter Repairs 1 260 6003 Meter Installation 2.25 _ _ 585 * 6004 Meter Reading 2 104 6005 Customer Questions 1 52 category total 1391 Cross Department Support 7001 City Wide Events 40 40 7002 Street Support 89.5 89.5 7003 Sewer Support 135 135 7004 Park Support 32 32 7005 Police 2 2 7006 Non-City 16 16 7007 Administration 40 40 7008 City Council 8 8 7009 Other 0 category total 362.5 Water Maintenance Hours ID Number Description Daily Weekly Monthly Annually As Needed Total Administration and Training 8001 In House Training -- 40 40 8002 In House Workshop --- 16 16 8003 Off Site Local Training 8 8 * 8004 Off Site Regional Training 8 8 * 8005 Off Site State Conferences 16 16 * 8006 Staff Meetings 80 80 8007 City Wide Meetings 8 8 8008 Educational --- 8 8 category total 184 Vehicle & Equipment Maint. 9001 Routine Vehicle Maintenance 1 52 9002 Routine Equipment Maint. 1 52 9003 Major Vehicle Maint. 40 40 9004 Major Equipment Maint. 40 40 category total 184 Time Off 10001 Vacation 320 320 * 10002 Sick Leave 168 168 * 10003 Holiday 208 208 10004 Compensation Time 160 160 * 10005 Overtime 625 625 * 10006 Other 40 40 category total 1521 Office/Prep 11001 CoEntry 1 364 11002 Coding 1 Bills 1 52 11003 Research 16_ 126 11004 Correspondence 0.5 26 11005 Cleaning 80 80 category total 714 Total Hours 6477 * Denotes areas needing improvement or change in scheduling Locate service/B-Box-we need to update our files with locations of B-Boxes for ease of future reference. New Construction Samples- This item will continue to grow as the city does, and as we expand our own facilities. Daily Well Check-As we expand, this will increase dramatically with the addition of the Cation exchange plants start to come on line. Daily Booster Check- This will increase with expansion will include at least two more for sure. Hydrant Replacement-We have some older hydrants that need replacing. If we can budget time and money, I would like to replace at least 4 per year. Valve Operation - We need to get back to seasonal operation of each valve. We have gotten away from it due to time and manpower constraints Meter Installation - This is actually a combination of outside reader installation on new construction and meter replacement in existing residences. This is exploding with the new growth. Training - We need to continue education in all departments, but water is very important with the implementation of new treatment methods, and the requirement of C.E.U.'s to maintain a valid license. I I Summary Each department within public works has unique characteristics which make it difficult to set one standard for maintenance throughout public works. I have used figures that more truly represent what each department's responsibilities are within public works. All dollar amounts are from the 2002-2003 fiscal year budget. All figures are current, and do not include the following: Windett Ridge, The Highlands, Country Hills H, Heartland Circle, Grande Reserve, Kimball Hill, Menard's Residential, or either project in Yorkville Marketplace. Water Department Salaries(Full time, Part time, Overtime and benefits) $162,995 TOTAL MILES OF WATER MAIN 66 = $2469 per mile Infrastructure and Operational Supplies $359,850 TOTAL MILES OF WATER MAIN 66 = $5452 per mile Capital Expenses* $84,000 TOTAL MILES OF WATER MAIN 66 = $1272 per mile TOTAL COST PER MILE OF WATER MAIN $9193 *Reflects entire public works capital budget divided by 3 for sewer, water and streets. Manpower Existing manpower 2 full time employees @ 2080 per year= 4160 1 part time employee @ 400 per year= 400 Total Hours 4560 Total hours needed per study 6477 Difference - 1917 Conclusion— 1 full time employee is needed to meet the standards that are being set forth. Fiscal Impact 1 full time employee Maintenance Worker I with benefits $34580 1 Full set of uniforms and gear $2000 TOTAL $36580 totals 2002 WATER DEPT.2002 JAN. FEB. MARCH APRIL MAY JUN JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. TOTAL HOURS TOTALS ROUNDS 52.5 36 28 34 38.5 36 41 42.5 30 34.5 33 36 442 SERVICE CALL 10.5 19.5 32 20 38.5 33 32 40.5 31.5 17 31 33.5 339 VALVES/B-BOX 2 11 10.5 6 24.5 10 3 4 11 6 13.5 8 109.5 METERS 42.51 128 61 52 77 58.5 59 56.5 52.5 64.5 66 73.5 791 HYDRANTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 83 0 0 83 H20 BREAKS 2 0 0 0 13 0 3 121 0 9 4.5 if 55 TAP H20 MAINS 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 Or 0 4 0 0 5.5 LOCATES 16 13 5 15 29 43 31 31_ 8.5 8 18 16 240.5 NEW CONSTRUCTION 29 13 . 42.5 34.5 15 2 7 39.5 6 22.5 26 18.5 255.5 EQUIP.REPAIR 42 5 14.5 10 8 2 2 0 0 0 12.5 13 109 TRUCK REPAIR 3 0 5.5 5 1.5 0.5 3 7 0 2 4.5 3 35 OFFICE/BILLS 69.5 44 56.5 8.5 25 16 13.5 5.51- 25 14 30.5 20.5 328.5 MONTHLY SAMPLES 0 0 4.5 6.5 15.5 5 5.5 3.51 15.5 51 4.5 6 71.5 STREET DEPT. 25.5 10 10 0 0 8 o e. 2 5 17 4 89.5 PARKS DEPT. 0 0 7 3 2 0 0 5 11 0 4 0 32 SEWER DEPT. 8 4 2 18 21 11 181 22 5 81 6 12 135 MISC. 23 9 48.5 87 18 49 2 4 40.5 201 7 9.5 317.5 CITY BUILDINGS 3 2 1 0 0 0 4 0 6.5 1.51- 0 4 22 SICK PAY 32 2.5 8 19 16 10 0 16 8 16 10f 11 148.5 ' VACATION 0 8 0 0 0 0 96 241 56 0 0 0 184 HOLIDAY 8 16 16 0 16 0 16 01 16 0 48 641 200 OVERTIME 38.5 50 64.5 62 58.5 54.5 26.5 67.51 31 75.5 50.5 46 625 O.T.TO COMP. 0 0 13.5 26.5 6 6.5 2 8751 1 34.5 7.5 3.5 109.5 COMP TIME TAKEN 0 0 8 28 8 36 32 24 10 48 0 8 202 P.T. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,TOTAL HOURS 407 371 438.5 435 432.5 381 396.5 428 367 478 394 401.5 4930 Page 1 i JOE MOORE 2002 WATER DEPT.2002 JAN. FEB. MARCH APRIL MAY JUN 1JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. TOTAL HOURS ----, JOE MOORE ROUNDS 46.5 36 28 26 36.5 30 17 36.5 28 26. 331 26 370 SERVICE CALL 3.5 1.5 3 2 5.5 6 9 6.5 8.5 5 9 5.5 65 VALVES/B-BOX 3 0.5 1 1 1 6.5 1 14 METERS 32.5 85 61 50 76 54.5 35 56.5 52.5 55.5 58 64.5 681 HYDRANTS 27 27 H2O BREAKS 4 0.5 1.5 6 TAP H20 MAINS 1.5 1.5 LOCATES 2 4 1.5 1 8 16.5 NEW CONSTRUCTION 25 245 12.5 12 5 34.5 1 14.5, 15 6.5 150.5 EQUIP.REPAIR 30 0.5 1.5 2.5 34.5 TRUCK REPAIR 1.5 1.5 0.5 0.5 4 OFFICE/BILLS 7.5 14.5 35.5 6.5 12.5 11 5.5 5.5 131 2 7.5 6.5 127.5 MONTHLY SAMPLES 45 6.5 15.51 5 4.51 3.51 15.5 5 4.5 6 70.5 STREET DEPT. 5.5 1 6.5 PARKS DEPT. 0 SEWER DEPT. 0 MISC. 15 9 24.5 35 6 35 2 4 18.5 2 4 7.5 162.5 CITY BUILDINGS 3 2.5 1.5 7 SICK PAY 16 2.5 3 8 2 5 21 3 44.6':: VACATION 80 80' HOLIDAY8 8 8 8 8 24 32 96 OVERTIME 16 15.5 30.5 25 23.5 20 8 22 19.51 20 12.5 13 225.5 O.T.TO COMP. 10 19.5 6.5 2 8.5 1 34.5 7.5 3.5 93 COMP TIME TAKEN 28 16 16 24 10 32 8 134 P.T. 0 TOTAL HOURS 200.5 176.5 233 214 207.5 186.5 194 206.5 179.5 238751- 188 192.51 2417 , I 1 Page 1 ‘ / brian 2002 WATER DEPT.2002 JAN. FEB. MARCH APRIL MAY JUN JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC. 1TOTAL HOURS BRIAN SORENSEN ROUNDS 6 8 2 6 24 6 2 8 10 72 SERVICE CALL 7 18 29 18 33 27 23 34 23 12 221 28 274 . ,— VALVES/B-BOX 2 8 10 6 235 10 3 3 11 5 7 7 95.5 METERS 10 43 2 1 4 24 9 8 9 110 HYDRANTS 56 56 H2O BREAKS 2 13 3 12 5 4 10 49 TAP H20 MAINS 4 4 LOCATES 16 13, 5 15 29 43 29 34 7 8 17 8 224 NEW CONSTRUCTION 4 13 18 22 3 2 2 5 5 8 11 12 105 EQUIP.REPAIR 12 4.5 13 10 8 2 2 10 13 74.5 TRUCK REPAIR 3 4 5 3 7 2 4 3 31 OFFICE/BILLS 62 29.5 21 2 12.5 5 8 12 12 23 14 201 MONTHLY SAMPLES I 1 1 STREET DEPT. 20 9 10 8 8 2 5 17 4 83 PARKS DEPT. 7 3 2 5 11 4 32 SEWER DEPT. 8 4 2 18 21 11 18 22 5 8 6 12 135 MISC. 8 24 52 12 14 22 18 3 2 155 CITY BUILDINGS 2 1 4 4 4 15 SICK PAY 16 8 16 8 8 16 8 8 8 8 104 VACATION 8 16 24 5C 104 HOLIDAY 8 8 8 8 8 8 24 32 104 OVERTIME 22.5 34.5 34 37 35 34.5 18.5 45.5 11.5 55.5 38 33 399.5 O.T.TO COMP. 3.5 7 6 16.5 COMP TIME TAKEN 8 8 20 16 16 68 P.T. 0 TOTAL HOURS 206.5 194.5 205.5 221 225 194.5 202.5 221.5, 187.5 239.5 206 209 2513 Page 1 10111, Name Week Of Description SUN MON TUE WED THUR FRI SAT TOTAL Water Main Maintenance Main Break Repair New Installation Contractor Assistance Other Water Service Maintenance Raise/Lower B-Box Locate Service Leak Repair Service Tap Other Samples and Testing Monthly Samples New Construction Samples Boil Order Samples Other Samples Well Maintenance Daily Check Booster Station Check Monthly Well Data Reports Draw Downs Emergency Repair Annual Check Hydrant and Valve Maint. Hydrant Repair Hydrant Replacement Hydrant Flushing Valve Repair Valve replacement Valve Operation Customer Service Service Call Meter Repair Meter Installation Meter Reading Customer Questions Cross Department Support City Events Sewer Support Street Support Park Support Police Non-City Administration City Council Other Administration and Training In House Training In House Workshop Off Site Local Training Off Site Regional Training Off Site State Conferences Staff Meetings City Wide Meetings Educational Vehicle and Equipment Maint Routine Vehicle Maintenance Routine Equipment Maint. Major Vehicle Maintenance ` Major Equipment Maint. Time Off Vacation Sick Leave Holiday Comp Time _ Overtime Other Office/Prep Data Entry Coding Bills Research Correspondence Cleaning United City of Yorkville Public Works Department Sewer Department Maintenance Plan and Standards Goals • Provide citizens of Yorkville with certain services that ensure safe and effective transportation of sanitary waste. Purpose • Scheduling- identifying recurring and non-recurring work • Monitor work functions and data collection • Preview future weekly and monthly schedules • Establish a level of maintenance standards • Determine frequency of maintenance • Determine personnel standards and levels • Determine growth impacts on maintenance • Determine cost impacts for maintenance and expansion Classification of Maintenance • Housekeeping- General cleaning in the shop and office areas. For example, sweeping, mopping, scrubbing, emptying garbage cans, washing vehicles • Routine Maintenance- Checking lift stations, degreasing, performing JULIE locates,jetting, and similar recurring maintenance activities • Preventative Maintenance- (includes periodic inspections to prevent break down)- trucks,jetter, backhoe, power tools, and other equipment used by the sewer department • City Programs- assisting other departments in the preparation for city sponsored events. • Scheduled Improvements- pulling lift station pumps for inspection and rebuilding, exercising generator motors, infrastructure upgrades, and large equipment repairs and replacements. • Emergency Repairs -Usually due to weather, misuse, or other unpredictable occurrences. • Other- items that do not fit into one of the identified categories Sewer Maintenance Identification 10 Maintenance Sanitary Sewer Manhole 10-01 Manhole inspection 10-02 Minor Repairs 10-03 Major Repairs 10-04 Frame Adjustments 10-05 Cleaning 20 Sanitary Sewer Main Maintenance 20-01 Weekly Jetting 20-02 Monthly Jetting 20-03 Emergency Repairs 30 Customer Service 30-01 Service Call 30-02 Sanitary Sewer Main Check 30-03 General Customer Questions 30-04 Contractor Questions 30-05 JULIE Locates 40 Lift Station Maintenance 40-01 Daily Check 40-02 Degreasing Lift Stations 40-03 Monthly Maintenance 40-04 Exercise Generators 40-05 Emergency Repair 40-06 Annual Check 50 Cross Department Support 50-01 City Wide Events 50-02 Street Support 50-03 Water Support 50-04 Park Support 50-05 Police Support 50-06 Non-City Support 50-07 Administration 50-08 City Council 50-09 Other 60 Administration and Training 60-01 In House Training 60-02 In House Workshop 60-03 Off Site Local Training 60-04 Off Site Regional Training 60-05 Off Site State Conferences 60-06 Staff Meetings 60-07 City Wide Meetings 60-08 Educational 70 Time Off 70-01 Vacation 70-02 Sick Leave 70-03 Holiday 70-04 Compensation Time 70-05 Over Time 70-06 Other 80 Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance 80-01 Routine Vehicle Maintenance 80-02 Routine Equipment Maintenance 80-03 Major Vehicle Maintenance 80-04 Major Equipment Maintenance 90 Office/Prep 90-01 Data Entry 90-02 Coding bills 90-03 Research 90-04 Correspondence 90-05 cleaning Sewer Maintenance Hours ID Number Description Daily Weekly Monthly Annually As Needed Total Manhole Maintenance ill 1001 Inspections 4 48 * 1002 Minor Repairs 16 16 1003 Major Repairs 32 32 1004 Frame Adjustments 32 32 1005 Cleaning 80 80 * category total 208 Main Maintenance 2001Weekly Jetting 16 384 IIM 20022 Monthly Jetting 32 384 2003 Emergency Repairs -- 120 120 1336 Customer Service 3001 Service Call 2 104 3002 Main Check 1 52 3003 Customer Questions 1 52 3004 Contractor Questions 4 208 3005 JULIE Locates 4 1040 category total 1456 Lift Station Maintenance 4001 Daily Check 2 520 4002 Degreasing Lift Stations 2 104 4003 Monthly Maintenance 2 24 * 4004 Exercise Generators 2 104 * 4005 Emergency Repair 160 160 4006 Annual Check 80 80 category total 992 Cross Department Support 5001 City Wide Events 200 200 5002 Street Support 190 190 5003 Water Support 330 330 5004 Park Support 40 40 5005 Police 2 2 5006 Non-City III 16 16 5007 Administration 40 40 5008 City Council 8 8 5009 Other 0 category total 826 Sewer Maintenance Hours ID Number Description Daily Weekly Monthly Annually As Needed Total Administration and Training 6001 In House Training 40 40 6002 In House Workshop 16 16 6003 Off Site Local Training 8 8 6004 Off Site Regional Training 8 8 6005 Off Site State Conferences 16 16 6006 Staff Meetings 80 80 6007 City Wide Meetings 8 8 6008 Educational 8 8 category total 184 Vehicle&Equipment Maint. 7001 Routine Vehicle Maintenance 1 52 7002 Routine Equipment Maint. 1 52 7003 Major Vehicle Maint. 40 40 7004 Major Equipment Maint. 40 40 category total 184 Time Off 8001 Vacation 160 160 * 8002 Sick Leave 168 168 * 8003 Holiday 208 208 8004 Compensation Time -- 80 80 8005 Overtime 400 400 * 8006 Other 40 40 category total 1056 Office/Prep 9001 Data Entry 1 52 9002 Coding Bills 1 52 9003 Research 8 96 9004 Correspondence 0.5 26 9005 Cleaning 80 80 category total 306 Total Hours 6588 * Denotes areas needing Improvement or change in scheduling Manhole Inspections-I would like to start a preventative program where we try and stop problems before they progress to an emergency situation. Manhole Cleaning-Follow up to inspections,we will spend more time cleaning after inspections. Weekly Jetting-Establish a weekly jetting program for maintenance. Devise plan to encompass entire town on a rotational basis throughout the year. Lift station monthly maintenance-a comprehensive program for routine maintenance to ensure a long working life of each of our lift stations. Vacation,sick time, and overtime-we need to start accounting for this time. It is becoming very difficult to schedule employees when many of them have hundreds of hours of time off. Summary Each department within public works has unique characteristics which make it difficult to set one standard for maintenance throughout public works. I have used figures that more truly represent what each department's responsibilities are within public works. All dollar amounts are from the 2002-2003 fiscal year budget. All figures are current, and do not include the following: Windett Ridge, The Highlands, Country Hills II, Heartland Circle, Grande Reserve, Kimball Hill, Menard's Residential, or either project in Yorkville Marketplace. NOTE—at this time, we are using the same number of miles as water main until such time we can get a more accurate count. Sewer Department Salaries (Full time, Part time, Overtime and benefits) $127,578 TOTAL MILES OF WATER MAIN 66 = $1933 per mile Infrastructure and Operational Supplies $55027 TOTAL MILES OF WATER MAIN 66 = $833 per mile Capital Expenses* $84,000 TOTAL MILES OF WATER MAIN 66 = $1272 per mile TOTAL COST PER MILE OF WATER MAIN $4038 *Reflects entire public works capital budget divided by 3 for sewer, water and streets. Manpower Existing manpower 2 full time employees @ 2080 per year= 4160 Total Hours 4160 Total hours needed per study 6588 Difference - 2428 Conclusion— 1 full time employee is needed to meet the standards that are being set forth. Fiscal Impact 1 full time employee Maintenance Worker I with benefits $34580 1 Full set of uniforms and gear $2000 TOTAL $36580 2002 I TOTAL JAN FEB MAR APR I MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC TOTAL LIFT STATIONS 85 59 76.5 67.5_1_ 52.5 45.5 79 92 105.5 65 55 65.5 848 LOCATES 90 83 88 701 58 55 109 130 118.5 126 72 75.5 1075 JETTING 38 3.5 13 27.5 11.5 9.5 24 19 13 0 8.5 8.5 176 STORM/SEWER 3 23.5 8 11 7 01 3 1 3 6.5 2.5 0 68.5 SANITARY/SEWER 6 0 19 17.5 0 0 0 5 0 0 2.5 0 50 SERVICECALL 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 2 1 0 4.5 7.5 PLOWSNOW 7 2.5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.5 SALTING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 2:5' OFFICE/BILLS 3 0 16 7 7.5 2 3 12.5 1 16 8.5 8 84.5 .MISC 41 9 0 0 0 0 it 13 5 0 1.5 6 76.5 .EQUIP/REPAIR 0 3.5 4 5 0 3 7 0 0 14 5.5 13.5 55.5 TRUCK/REPAIR 4 0 5 01, 14 5 0 0 7 0 13.5 14.5 63 1 CITY/BLDGS 20 21.5 18.5 0 3.5 21.5 3.5 13 21 10 51.5 195 WATER/DEPT 23 . 17.5 21 21.5 22 20.5. 1±L 31 43.5 81.5 16 17.5 329 STREET/DEPT 8.5 9 44 8 4.5 16 10.51 21 8.5 11 25 19.5 185.5 PARK/DEPT 0 0 3 2 1.5 0 01 9 0 0 17 1 33.5 SICK/DAY 0 32 0 8 0 0 01 0 0 0 19.5 16 75.5 HOLIDAY 32 16 81_ 0 8 0 8 0 16 8 48 32 176 VAC/DAY 0 0 8 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 OVER/TIME 9.5 24 63.5 17 0 0- 0.5 0 11 17.5 4 17 164 OTC 10 18 0 0 6 19 15.5 15.5 3 24 0 20 131 F/H 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 24 .COMP/TAKEN 0 62 0 0 0 0 8 16 5 11.5 32 8 145.5 TOTAL 380 384 399.5 361 192.5 179 304 368.5 358 411 341 389 4067.5 ( . . SEWER DEPARTMENT 2002' L 1 _ CARL FERGUSON .JAN .FEB .MARCH .APRIL .MAY JUNE .JULY AUGT .SEPT .OCT .NOV .DEC TOTAL LIFTSTATIONS 30 50 56.5 35t 21.5 17 210 LOCATES 40 81.5 66 88 66 68 409.5 JETTING 10 8.5 6.5 2 27 _ STORM/SEWER ------' 3 1 4 .SANITARY/SEWER 0 SERVICECALL 0 PLOWSNOW 0 SALTING 0 OFFICE/BILLS 1 2.5 3.5 .MISC 113 2.5 6 22.5 .EQUIP/REPAIR 3 11 21, 3 19 .TRUCK/REPAIR3.5 5.5 7 16 CITY/BLDGS 8.5 ' 3 13 5 25 54.5 WATER/DEPT 5.5 12.5 16.5 29 6 i 8 77.5 STREET/DEPT 2 3 5.5 1 10 20.5 PARK/DEPT 4.5 17 21.5 SICK/DAY 11.5 11.5 ...___ HOLIDAY 8 8 24 16 56 VAC/DAY I -I-- 0 OVER/TIME 0.59 2 11.5 1_ ,_. OTC 2.5 3 6.5 12 F/H 8 8 .COMP/TAKEN 1 1.5 8 8 17.5 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 104.5 179 . 171 201 170.5 176 1002 1 ^ . oswsnosp�nIm�w� 2002 | | - _ ' ----- --� --� MIFF MIKKELSON .JAN .FEB .MARCH --��---- --'---- - Jowe TJlL, -.AUG !SEPT __-.00T .NOV .DEC TOTAL LIFTSTATIONS 43 31 46.5 20 140.5 LOCATES 45.5 64.5 o.6628 138.66 JETTING 20.5 3.5 8 m 42 .STORmmewsn 23.5 7 4 - _ 34.5oAw/n��uewsn 6 6.5 m uu.o SERVICECALL � _ __ pLnwswmw 1 �s 1 - 4.5 SAcr/wo » OFFICE/BILLS 3 16 7 - -- 26 .M/no 24 9� - � --'- --- _ _ Ji .EQUIP/REPAIR -� --------- --- o .TRUCK/REPAIR 4 u " -_ -- _- CITY/ � a�uoo _ _ __ '_- �Arsnmspr --- 9 1 3 � 1. ---- _ 14 STREET/DEPT 4 r 4 --__ '_ 15 pAnmuspr ~ SICK/DAY 32 -- - __ __ 32 HOLIDAY - 16 8 ---- -- -- . 24 VAC/DAY ---� u 80 --- - _ 88 OVER/TIME 9.5 24 44.5 ' 1 __ - re oro ~ pm - -- a « -__ - .COMP/TAKEN xxsw �- _ _ __- TOL 185.5 '---- 206 147./6 -'169- o��- 0 0 0 mr' 2101 170.5 213 707.66 , � • , SEWER DEPARTMENT ��_ DAVE BEHRENS --' JAN .�ee .MARCH APRIL ��vJUNE --- .JULY .AUG�oo SEPT' aePT OCT' o� mov �bso TOTAL LIFTSTATIONS 42 28 aO47.5 52.5- 45.5 4S 42 4n 30 33.5 48.5 497.5 LOCATES lOCATsa 44.5 18.5 22 42 58 -- 55 -��nn - 48.5 52.5 38 6 7.5 461.5 JETTING 17.5 5- 17.5 11.5 9.5 14 10.5 6.5 6.5 8.5 107 .STORM/SEWER 3 --- 1 7 7 - - 3 6.5 ---2.5 30 .SANITARY/SEWER | ----1Z5--- ,�5 5 2.5 . 27.5 / -----' - -- SERVICECALL 2 1 4.5 7 n PLOWSNOW 6 �3 9_-- _ --------- SALTING z 7.5 2 2 10 1 16 8.5 . 2.5 o OFFICE/BILLS8 55 . �|oC.EQUIP/REPAIR 17 --� --- --------- 2.5 1.5 21 - 3.5 4 n 3 - � 3 3.5 10.5 365 ' .TRUCK/REPAIR 3 14 5 as 8 7.5 41 CJTv�Loan 20 21.5 18.5 11 3.5 13 3.5 10 n S 26.5 140.5 -WATER/DEPT 14 16.5 1820.5uz co� 8.5 18.5 27 52.5 10 9.5 237.5STREET/DEPT 4.5 - 2 �0 -- 8 4.5 - 16 on - 18 3 11 25 9.5 150 PARK/DEPT3� u - �.n 4.5 1 12 - - - SICK/DAYx 16 32e HOLIDAY 16 8 --- 8 - 8 8 � 24 16 96 " VAC/DAY - - ovEOVER/TIME1n 16 11 8.5 T|�s2 17 735 OTC 10 18 ---- --- 6 19 15.5 7o . 17.5 20 119 F/H 8 8 .COMP/TAKEN �� � _ _ _ 8 16 -o 10 24 128 TOTAL194.5 178 � 187 192 �� 5 179 199.5 189.5 187 210 170.5' 213 uu§c.s • _ __ _ _ _ -_ _ _ ___ 1 Name Week Of Description SUN MON TUE WED THUR FRI TOTAL Maintenance Sanitary MH Inspection Minor Repairs Major Repairs Frame Adjustment Main Maintenance Weekly Jetting Monthly Jetting ---_- Emergency Repair Customer Service Service Call Sanitary Sewer Main Check General Customer Questions Contractor Questions JULIE Locates 11111111 Lift Station Maintenance _------= -- Daily Check -- Degrease Lift Station - Monthly Maintenance ExerciseGenerators Emerency Repait -_ ---- Annual Maintenance Cross Department Support City Wide Events Street Support ---- Water Support Parks Support Police Support --_--- Non-City SupportMEI -�- Administration Support C City Council Other Administration and Training MEM In House Training InHouse Workshop Off �----- ff Site Local Training Off Site Regional Training --=- Off Site State Conferences Staff Meetings City Wide Meetings -- Educational �-- --- Time Off Vacation Sick Leave --- --- Holiday ---- 1.1 Comp Time Overtime14 .111.1.11=111 Other Vehicle and Equipment Maint Routine Vehicle Maintenance Equipment Maint. Major Vehicle Maintenance ---- MajorficEquipment Maint. ----- Office/PrepElli Data Entry -- Coding Bills Research Correspondence Cleaning United City of Yorkville Public Works Department Street Department Maintenance Plan and Standards Goals Maintaining a municipal network of roadways to ensure safety for the motoring public. Maintaining all signage within the United City of Yorkville to ensure efficiency and safety. Maintaining street lights and traffic signals to ensure safety. Maintain all storm sewers to ensure drainage of roadways and ditches. Purpose • Scheduling- identifying recurring and non-recurring work • Monitor work functions and data collection • Preview future schedules • Determine frequency of maintenance • Determine personnel standards and levels • Determine growth impacts on maintenance • Determine cost impacts for maintenance and expansion Classification of Maintenance • Housekeeping - General cleaning in the shop and office areas. For example, sweeping, mopping, scrubbing, emptying garbage cans, and washing vehicles. • Routine Maintenance - daily well monitoring, installation of outside readers, acting on problem response forms, and similar recurring maintenance activities. • Preventative Maintenance—(includes periodic inspections to prevent breakdown)- trucks, backhoe, pumps, power tools, and other equipment used by the water department • City Programs— assisting other departments in the preparation for city sponsored events. • Scheduled Improvements—flushing hydrants, exercising valves, main and service installations, hydrant replacement, and large equipment repairs and replacements. • Emergency Repairs—usually due to weather, misuse, or other unpredictable occurrences. • Other—items that do not fit into one of the identified categories. Water Maintenance Identification 100- City Services 101 Brush Pick Up 102 Leaf Removal 103 Storm Clean Up 104 Other 200- Traffic Control/Street Lighting 201 Sign Installation 202 Sign Repair 203 Traffic Signal Repair 204 Street Light Installation 205 Street Light Repair 206 Other 300- Street Maintenance 301 Hot Patch 302 Cold Patch 303 Curb Maintenance 304 Striping 305 Other 400- Plowing/Salting 401 Streets 402 Parking Lots 403 Sidewalks 404 Bulk Snow Removal 405 Other 500- Vehicle/Equipment Maintenance 501 Routine Vehicle Maintenance 502 Routine Equipment Maintenance 503 Major Vehicle Maintenance 504 Major Equipment Maintenance 505 Emergency Repair 600—Facility Maintenance 601 General Maintenance 602 Special Projects 603 Electrical 604 Plumbing 605 Heating/Cooling 606 Other 700- Right of Way Maintenance 701 Mowing 702 Trash/Litter Removal 703 Weed Spraying 704 Trimming/Pruning Trees 705 Landscaping 706 Grade and Fill Shoulders 800- Storm Sewer Maintenance 801 Catch Basin Cleaning 802 Catch Basin Repair 803 Pipe Repair 804 Manhole Repair 900- Cross Department Support 901 City Wide Events 902 Sewer Support 903 Water Support 904 Park Support 905 Police 906 Non-City 907 Administration 908 City Council 1000- Administration and Training 1001 In House Training 1002 In House Workshop 1003 Off Site Local Training 1004 Off Site Regional Training 1005 Off Site State Conferences 1006 Staff Meetings 1007 City Wide Meetings 1008 Educational 2000- Time Off 2001 Vacation 2002 Sick Leave 2003 Holiday 2004 Compensation Time 2005 Overtime 2006 Other 3000- Office/Prep 3001 Data Entry 3002 Coding Bills 3003 Research 3004 Correspondence 3005 Cleaning Street Department Maintenance ID Number Description Daily Weekly Monthly Annually As Needed Total City Services 101 Brush Pick Up 480 800 * 102 Leaf Removal 160 320 * 103 Storm Clean Up 40 40 104 Other Category Total 1160 Traffic Control/Street Lighting 201 Sign Installation 200 200 202 Sign Repair 93.5 93.5 203 Traffic Signal Repair 11 132 204 Street Light Installation 24 24 205 Street Light Repair 12.5 150 206 Other Category Total 599.5 Street Maintenance 301 Hot Patch 31 31 * 302 Cold Patch 11.5 138 303 Curb Maintenance 56 56 304 Striping 80 80 * 305 Other Category Total 305 Plowing/Salting 401 Streets 265 648 * 402 Parking Lots 403 Sidewalks 404 Bulk Snow Removal 405 Other Category Total 648 Street Department Maintenance ID Number Description Daily Weekly Monthly Annually As Needed Total Vehicle/Equipment Maint 501 Routine Vehicle Maintenance 10 120 502 Routine Equipment Maintenance 10 120 503 Major Vehicle Maintenance 8 96 504 Major Equipment Maintenance 10 120 505 Emergency Repair 10 120 Category Total 576 Facility Maintenance 601 General Maintenance 16 192 602 Special Projects 80 80 603 Electrical 40 40 604 Plumbing 40 40 605 Heating/Cooling 606 Other 50 50 Category Total 402 Right of Way Maintenance 701 Mowing 400 400 702 Trash/Litter Removal 8 8 703 Weed Spraying 8 8 704 Trimming/Pruning 480 480 * 705 Landscaping 119 119 706 Grade and Fill Shoulders 40 40 * Category Total 1055 Storm Sewer Maintenance 801 Catch Basin Cleaning 56 56 * 802 Catch Basin Repair 16 16 803 Pipe Repair 804 Manhole Repair Category Total 72 Street Department Maintenance ID Number Description Daily Weekly Monthly Annually As Needed Total Cross Department Support 901 City Wide Events 80 902 Sewer Support 100 100 903 Water Support 245.5 245.5 904 Park Support 147 147 905 Police 16 16 906 Non-City 8 8 907 Administration 8 8 908 City Council 0 Category Total 524.5 Administration and Training 1001 In House Training 16 16 1002 In House Workshop 0 1003 Off Site Local Training 48 48 1004 Off Site Regional Training 0 * 1005 Off Site State Conferences 0 * 1006 Staff Meetings 48 48- 1007 City Wide Meetings 16 16 1008 Educational 0 Category Total 128 Time Off 2001 Vacation 200 200 * 2002 Sick Leave 400 400 * 2003 Holiday 224 224 2004 Compensation Time 480 480 * 2005 Overtime 0 2006 Other Category Total 1304 Street Department Maintenance ID Number Description Daily Weekly Monthly Annually As Needed Total Office/Prep 3001 Data Entry 3002 Coding Bills 1 52 3003 Research 2 104 3004 Correspondence 1 260 3005 Cleaning 6 312 Category Total 728 Total 7502 * Denotes areas needing improvement or change in scheduling Street Department Maintenance Standards 1. Brush Pick Up —as the City expands, it is becoming increasing difficult to complete brush pick up throughout the city in one week. I would like to explore the possibility of asking the residents to cut their brush to 4' in length and bundle it. This would end our time crunch, and disputes on size. 2. Leaf Removal—we are currently budgeting for a leaf copper/vacuum, this will speed up our time by allowing us to pick up on our schedule instead of relying on Waste Management. The drawback to the whole idea of leaf pick up is that it is becoming increasingly expensive to compost the material (currently $125.00 per load), and we are only getting leaves from less than half of the City. As the years go by, we are going to have to budget an ever increasing amount to this task to continue to serve the City. We may need to re-educate the residents to remind them that they have a special service with WMI in that they have unlimited yard waste removal without stickers. If we could get them to take advantage of this program, we would save both time and money. 3. Hot Patch—I would like to take a more aggressive approach to try and maintain our current streets. If we would cut out bad spots, and patch them, it will prolong the life of the street instead of cold patching little holes only to come back later to do it again. 4. Striping—we need to stripe at least twice per year. Right now, we do it once per year when needed. 5. Plowing streets—the number on the street department time study is not a true representation of the actual time spent clearing the roads, parking lots, and sidewalks of the City. I realize that all departments will assist the street department in plowing and salting, but we need to be able to have some employees in reserve in case something else is happening, or people are not here. Right now, we have to be very careful how many people we call in, and how long they are on duty. 6. Trimming/Pruning— instead of trimming only the branches that become a problem, we need to have a seasonal program that we will be able to follow to help us maintain our parkway trees in a better manner than we are today. 7. Grade and Fill Shoulders—I would like to spend at least one week per month grading road shoulders to allow the water to drain off the pavement. Where we have gravel shoulders, I would like to re-grade them as well and add or subtract as needed. This will prolong the life of our current streets, and assist in getting the water off the pavement. 8. Catch Basin Cleaning— right now they are only cleaned on an as needed basis, I would like to set up a system where we can take at least a quadrant of the city and clean each basin. This will allow for better water flow, cleaner water flow into our detention basins, and will remove a breeding ground for mosquitoes. 9. Offsite Regional Training and Offsite State Conferences—I need to send more employees to training and conferences to keep up with the techniques and technologies. I can't do that right now, because it leaves extremely short handed for the days that they are not at work. Summary Each department within public works has unique characteristics which make it difficult to set one standard for maintenance throughout public works. I have used figures that more truly represent what each department's responsibilities are within public works. All dollar amounts are from the 2002-2003 fiscal year budget. All figures are current, and do not include the following: Windett Ridge, The Highlands, Country Hills II, Heartland Circle, Grande Reserve, Kimball Hill, Menard's Residential, or either project in Yorkville Marketplace. Street Department Salaries (Full time, Part time, Overtime and benefits) $128,858 TOTAL CENTER LINE MILES OF ROAD 41 = $3143 per mile Infrastructure and Operational Supplies $186,600 TOTAL CENTER LINE MILES OF ROAD 41 = $4551 per mile Capital Expenses* $84,000 TOTAL CENTER LINE MILES OF ROAD 41 = $2048 per mile TOTAL COST PER CENTER LINE MILE $9742 *Reflects entire public works capital budget divided by 3 for sewer, water and streets. Manpower Existing manpower 2 full time employees @ 2080 per year= 4160 1 part time employee @ 400 per year= 400 Total Hours 4560 Total hours needed per study 7502 Difference - 2942 Conclusion— 1 full time employee and 1 part time employee are needed to meet the standards that are being set forth. Fiscal Impact 1 full time employee Maintenance Worker I with benefits $34580 1 Full set of uniforms and gear $2000 1 part time employee @ 8.50 per hour for 400 hours $3400 TOTAL $39980 Name � _11111111111.1. Week Of Description SUN MON TUE WED THUR FRI SAT TOTAL City Services -- --- Bruch Pick Up Leaf Removal Removal -- _-_ Strom Clean Up Traffic Control/Lighting Sign Installation Sign Repair -- -- - TrafficSignal Repair -� - Street Light Installation IStreet Light Repair --Street Maintenance Hot Patch �- Cold Patch -- =�- Curb Maintenance Striping Plowing/Salting Streets Parking Lots Sidewalks =-Bulk Snow Removal Vehicle/Equipment Maint. Routine Vehicle Maint --Routine Equipment Maint Major Vehicle Maint Major Equipment Maint Emergency Repair Facility Maintenance General Maintenance Special Projects Electrical Plumbing Heating/Cooling Right of Way Maintenance Mowing Trash/Litter Removal Weed Spraying Trimming/Pruning Landscating Grade and Fill Shoulders Storm Sewer Maintenance Catch Basin Cleaning _ Catch Basin Repair -_ - ipe Repair Manhole Repair Cross Department Support City WideEvents SewerrSupport Water Support Parks Support Police Support Non-City Support Administration SupportA ---� In sand Training --� -� In House Training -- - InWorkshop O Site -�- Off Site Local Training OffStie Regional Training Off Site State Conferences Staff Meetings _ City Wide Meetings Time Off Vacation SiLeave Leaave Holiday Comp Time OTC Overtime Other �_--- Totals _ JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH TAPRIL MAY (JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER (DECEMBER TOTAL Date: Traffic Light 10 10 20 15 10 7 14 21 12 4 2 6 131 Street Light 16 5 25.5 5 38 6 25 3 12 13 12 _ 12 172.5 Cold Patch 13 4 11 21 31 19 4 18 0 8 0 10 139 Hot Patch 0 0 0 2 0 8 0 9 8 4 0 0 31 Plowing/SALTING 41.5 107 95.5 2 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.5 14.5 265 Road Shoulders 0 0 7 18 67 51 96.5 77 50 56 10 6 438.5 Landscaping 0 0 8 59 29 0 10 0 7 0 6 0 119 Brush 0 0 3 40 1 24 10.5 22 5 40 77 0- 222.5 Signs 6 3 11 9 12 13 28 23 - - 104 28 35.5 21 293.5 Storm Sewer 2 0 7 12 6 8 0 15 6 0 0 0 56 Equipment Repair 59 9 11 16 18 15 26.5 6 4 76 46 67 353.5 Vehicle Repair 66.5 14 32 12 _ 2 4 8 _ 8 _ _ 3 _ 11 20 36.5 217 Office Work 15 31 7 15 8 6 _ 14 17 10 19 6 _ 12 160 Misc. _ 5 8 _ 4 4 6 8 5 0 13 7 0 1 61 Water Department 12 29 5 17.5 33 10 18.5 18 34 47 _ 5 16.5 245.5 Parks Department 9 3 0 2 2 36 14 32 18 4 10 17 147 Sewer Department _ 6 3 0 5.5 15 3 1.1 14 15.5 3 10 14 100 Schooling 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 26 City Buildings 67 14 33 _ 35 50 14 51 29 14 12f 28 57 404 Comp Time Taken 8 48 0 0 0 22 0 8 3 12 0 4 105 Sick Day 0 0 12 24 0 48 0 16 1.5 16 0 - 9.5 127 Vacation 0 0 28 12 24 18 16 16 0 0 16 8 138 Holiday 32 32 16 0 16 0 16 0 16 8 48 40 224 Overtime 50 41.5 91.5 33.5 9.5 5.5 9.5 32.5 23 18 32 35 381.5 0 0 - - - Total 418 361.5 427.5 385.5 377.5 325.5 377.5 384.5 359 386 368 387 4557.5 i John Sleezer JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER 'OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER TOTAL - Date: Traffic Light 8 2 12 6 8 2 10 11 4 0 0 6 69 Street Light 14 2 14.5 5 - 26 6 15 2 6 7 12 6 115.5 Cold Patch 0 0 0 3 1.9 6 0 7 _ 0 0 _ 0 0 35 Hot Patch 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 11 Plowing 15.5 64 64.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.5 7.5 156 Road Shoulders 0 0 2 10 22- 24 47.5 41 33 28 8 0 215.5 Landscaping 0 0 0 19 19 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 400 Brush 0 0 0 24 0 0 10.5 20 3 20 35 0 112.5 Signs 0 0 3 3 0 7 5 4 - 50 10 9.5 2 93.5 Storm Sewer _ 0 0 0 4 0 4 _ 0 7 0 0 _ 0 0 15 Equipment Repair 50 _ 8 6 16 16 1.2 23.5 5 1 58 36 47 278.5 Vehicle Repair 52.5 13 6 7 0 2 6 _ 7 2 0 8 26 129.5 Office Work 6 31 _ _ 2 10 5 6 _ 10 13 5 1.4 4 5 111 Misc. 2 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 13 Water Department 0 29 _ 4 9.5 21 3 10.5 10 24 36 5 10.5 162.5 Parks Department 0 0 0 2 0 4 4 15 6 0 0 - 0 31 Sewer Department 0 3 0 5.5 12 - 0 11 3 9 3 - 6 10 62.5 Schooling 0 _ 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 City Buildings 20 0 - 16 8 19 0 15 16 8 0 16 28 146 Comp Time Taken 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 3 0 0 4 29 Sick Day 0 0 8 24 _ 0 _ 40 0 '_ 0 0 0 0 0 72 Vacation 0 0 20 12 4 18 8 8 0 0 0 0 70 Holiday 16 8 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 8 24 24 112 Overtime 27.5 30 52 16.5 5.5 0 9.5 19.5 17.5 16 14 28 236 0 Total 211.5 190 220 192.5 189.5 160 193.5 195.5 185.5 200 182 204 2324 \l i Matt Seng JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER TOTAL Date: — — - Traffic Light 2 8 8 9 2 5 4 10 8 4 2 0 62 Street Light 2 3 11 0 12 _ 0 10 1 6 — 6 - 0 6 57 Cold Patch 13 4 11 18 12 13 4 11 0 8 0 10 104 Hot Patch 0 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 20 --- - - - — — 0 p 7 7 109 Plowing/SALTING 26 43 31 2 0 0 0 0—_. 0Road Shoulders _ 0 0 5 8 45 27 49 3 6 1728 2 6 223 Landscaping 0 0 8 40 10 0 10 0 5 01 6 0 79 0 110 Br Brush 0 0 3 16 1 24 0 2 2 20 42 __— Signs 6 3 8 6 12 6, 23 19 54 18 2 19 200 -' - — 0 0 0 41 Storm Sewer 2 0 7 8 6 4 0 8 6 _- -- 1 _ - �— - Equipment Repair 9 1 5 0 2 3 3 1 3 18 10 20 75 Vehicle Repair 14 1 26 5 2 2 2 1 1 11 12 10.5 87.5 — --- - -- - -- -" 49 _ Office Work 9 0 5 _ 5 3 0 4 4 5 5 2 71- - 7 2 7 49 Misc. 3 8 2 4 1 8 5 0 9 - Water Department _ 12 0 1 8 12 7 8 8 10 _ 11 0 6 83 Parks Department 9 3 0 0 2 32 10 17 12 — 4 10 17 116 Sewer Department 6 0 0 0 3 3 0 11 6.5 0 4 4 37.5 Schooling 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 City Buildings _ 47 14 17 27 31 14 36 13 6 12 12 29 258 Comp Time Taken 8 48 0 0 0 _ 0 0 _ 8 0 -- 12'— _ 01--- 0 76 Sick Day 0 4 0 0 8 0 16 1.5 16 0 9.5 55 16 8 68 Vacation 0 8 -.- 0-- 20- 8 � 0 24 16 112 Holiday 16 24 8 0 8 __-- Overtime 22.5 11.5 39.5 17 4 5.5 0 13 5.5 2 18 7 145.55 Total 206.5 171.5 207.5 193 188 165.5 184 189 173.5 186 186 183 2233.5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WATER DEPARTMENT Current study shows a deficiency of 1 full time employee. Standards indicate that 1 full time employee is needed per 22 miles of water main. One additional employee will be needed when Cation exchange plants are operational SEWER DEPARTMENT Current study shows a deficiency of 1 full time employee Standards indicate that one full time employee is needed per 22 miles of sanitary sewer main. STREET DEPARTMENT Current study shows a deficiency of 1 full time and 1 part time employee. Standards indicate that 1 full time employee is needed every 14 center line mile of streets. YEARLY MANPOWER COSTS Water Department - $36,580 Sewer Department - $36,580 Street Department - $39,980 TOTAL $113,140 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE To: Tony Graff, City Administrator From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Subject: Menard Commercial Common's—BorfdReduction No. 2 Date: February 19, 2003 Attached find a request from Smith Engineering Consultants, Inc. to reduce the bond amount for Menard Commercial Commons. I have reviewed the request and concur with the most of their estimated work completed to date. There are some items that are not complete which we should not reduce the bond, such as sidewalks on McHugh Road, finishing off the Kennedy Basin, Kennedy Road construction, and some traffic signal items on Route 47. We have also recently changed our policy to allow reductions to 15% of the engineer's estimate of cost for substantially complete work. Based on the work completed to date, I recommend that the bond amount for Menards Commercial Commons be reduced by $5,795,825.35. A summary of the bond status is as follows: Original Bond amount: $9,548,792.06 Less previous reductions: $ 885,514.49 Less this reduction: $5,795,825.35 Amount remaining in Bond: $2,867,452.22 Please place this item on the Public Works Committee agenda of February 24, 2003 for consideration. Cc: Roger Arens, Menards Kevin Biscan, Smith Engineering Consultants, Inc. 19-Feb-03 Bond Reduction Calculations Subdivision: Menards Commercial Commons Reduction No. 2 Bond Approved Initial Bond Amount Substantially complete Amount to remain Item Enq. Est. Bond Amount After Red. No.1 prior to Red. No.2 after Red. No. 2 Onsite Roadways: Carpenter Street $166,560.00 $183,216.00 $119,671.70 $166,560.00 $24,984.00 Menard Drive $68,862.00 $75,748.20 $73,402.20 $68,862.00 $10,329.30 Marketview Drive $1,250,369.75 $1,375,406.73 $998,260.03 $1,250,369.75 $187,555.46 Countryside Parkway $3,118,716.75 $3,430,588.43 $3,278,013.21 $3,118,716.75 $467,807.51 McHugh Road $753,635.75 $828,999.33 $828,999.33 $690,858.75 $172,683.51 Miscellaneous $771,497.50 $848,647.25 $558,744.98 $759,311.50 $127,301.33 Landscaping $607,908.00 $668,698.80 $668,698.80 $0.00 $668,698.80 Offsite Roadways: $1,943,170.30 $2,137,487.33 $2,137,487.33 $978,310.55 $1,208,092.31 Totals $8,680,720.05 $9,548,792.06 $8,663,277.57 $7,032,989.30 $2,867,452.22 Notes: 1) Bond amt. to be 15% of substantially completed items plus 110% of uncompleted items. Smith Engineering Consultants, Inc. Civil/Structural Engineers and Surveyors Illinois Texas Wisconsin February 17, 2003 Mr. Joe Wywrot City Engineer United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Re: Menards Job No. MENA-010373-3 Dear Mr. Wywrot: On behalf of Menard, Inc., we hereby submit Letter of Credit Reduction requests for the on-site roadways and the off-site roadways for the above referenced project. Enclosed are spreadsheets detailing the completed improvements. We request reduction in the letter of credit to $1,532,410.44 or 25% of the Engineer's Estimate for the on-site roadways and $506,631.15 for the off-site roadways. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please call. Thank you, SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. Kevin J. Biscan, P.E., P.L.S. Senior Project Manager KJB/j mk Enclosure cc: Roger Arens, w/enc. Y:\Jobs\Smith\200I\010373-Menards-Yorkville-Redesign\correspondence\letters\010373 ltr-wywrot 021703 KJB.doc 759 John Street,Yorkville, IL 60560 www.smithengineering.com Telephone 630.553.7560 Fax 630.553.7646 `' UNITED CITY of YORKVILLE R ? County Seat of Kendall County K I800 Game Farm Rd. LL Yorkville, IL 60560 i,' 630-553-4350 kOLNOEO IN'' To: Larry Kot, Chairman ,...,t , .,�r From: Eric Dhuse, Public Works r_ _ --- Date: Date: February 18, 2003 "` Re: Truck Purchase Larry, I would like to request City Council Approval to purchase a utility truck for the water department. We were planning to purchase this truck in the next fiscal year through the Public Works Capital Fund, but due to the pending hiring of the engineer tech, we would like to move the purchase up a few months. In our five year plan, the Dodge Dakota is scheduled to be sold in the 03-04 fiscal year. Instead of selling it, we would like to utilize that truck in the engineering department until such time as a new truck can be budgeted for the department. We currently have enough money in the reserve of the capital fund to purchase the truck in this fiscal year, then remove it from next years budget to reimburse the reserve. I would ask that this be placed on the February 24, 2003 Public Works agenda for discussion. If you have any questions, please call me. Cc: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Traci Pleckham, Finance Director UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE To: Tony Graff, City Administrator From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Subject: Proposed Wetland Protection rdin ce Date: February 21, 2003 The proposed wetland ordinance, received on 1/22/03, has been revised per my memo dated 12/5/02. Most of my comments, however, dealt only with clarifications and minor issues. We should try to get input from the development community before proceeding to adopt the ordinance. If we don't get input within a reasonable period of time (perhaps by the end of March 15t) then I would recommend that we proceed with adoption. We will also need to pass a supplemental resolution that establishes an application fee and an escrow fee. The application fee helps to pay for administrative costs. I recommend that the application fee be around $100. The escrow fee is actually a deposit used to pay for consultant review of the application. I checked to see what the review costs were for several recent developments: Development Billed to Date Remarks Bristol Club $5600 Review incomplete Grande Reserve $3000 Review incomplete Westbury Village $2000 Review incomplete Windett Ridge $ 400 Review incomplete Based on these costs, I recommend that the escrow fee be around $5000. Please place this item on the Public Works Committee agenda of February 24, 2003 for consideration. Cc: Dan Kramer, City Attorney 02/24/2003 13: 16 6309545673 INLAND R E DEV CORP PAGE 02 i Inland Real Estate Development Corporation Q 7901 Butterfield Road Z Oak Brook,Illinois 60523 5 630-218.6000 Fax:630-954-5673 www,inlandgroup.com/ired February 21, 2003 VIA FACSIMILE Tony Graff City Administrator City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Dear Tony: You have requested our input on the proposed Wetlands Ord ance for the City of Yorkville. We have had two of our outside consultan , review the ordinance for their input, Beyond our consultants specific concerns, we are concerned bout the amount of new regulation being adopted by the City of York ille, Recently you have adopted a new Stormwater Management Ordinanc a and now propose this Wetland Ordinance, both of which are covered ther by prior regulation and/or are regulated by other governmental agenc •s. In the case of wetlands, they have been regulated for many years by the ' rmy Corps of Engineers as well as the NRCS. As you are aware, we have . ways found the Yorkville Subdivision Ordinance to be among the most strin, ent of the over two dozen that we deal with on a regular basis. Costs added r over regulation may be viewed as necessary to insure good Bevel• 'ment by the community, but these costs also do much to discourage deve apers. In addition new regulations create the need for more staff and t refore more costs to the City. While it can be argued that the City will pa . these costs along to developers, the truth is they ultimately get passed o to the future residents of Yorkville in the form of higher housing costs an, therefore higher assessed values and higher taxation. On that basis alo i -, we strongly would discourage the adoption of any City Wetland Ordinan' -. That being said, our consultants have pointed out specific sei ions of the draft ordinance which are objectionable. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT SPECIALISTS • 02/24/2003 13:16 6309545673 INLAND R E DEV CORP PAGE 03 Tony Graff February 21, 2003 Page—2- 1. Isolated waters of Yorkville are defined so that areas whi h would be exempted by the Code of Federal Regulations would not e exempted under the Yorkville Ordinance. For example an isolated . ea which is formed in an upland section of land due to poor grading ould be exempted under the 1987 Federal Regulation but the prod .sed Yorkville Ordinance would not exempt these. This alone would gre tly expand the City's jurisdiction. 2. The draft ordinance regulates roadside ditches even in ex avated upland areas. These too would be exempted under Federal Regu tions. 3. Section 3.1.2 of the proposed ordinance lacks any objecti e standards and leaves any developer open to subjective and arbitrary tre. ment by whoever Yorkville chooses to enforce this ordinance. Th section specifically concerns us. 4. Section 3.2.2 would require those people or companies d; i ineating wetlands to trespass on adjoining properties to identify o i site wetland areas, We don't think that was the City's intent but it is - end result of this section as drafted. Once again I must reiterate that we feel further regulations o wetlands at the municipal level expands the scope of municipal regulation b yond what is reasonably necessary to insure well planned, well developed _rowth and in fact could act as a deterrent to that. It certainly will add to c. .is incurred by the City and its current and future residents. Please feel free . call me with any questions you might have. Sincerely, INLAND RE//AL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT I •RPORATION Matthew G. Fiascone Senior Vice President MGF/mlr UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE To: Tony Graff, City Administrator From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Subject: Yorkville Road Program Date: February 18, 2003 Attached find the results of a street analysis prepared by Smith Engineering Consultants for several streets in the older sections of town. These streets in general are in poor condition, narrow, and have poor drainage. The analysis also included boring data, which indicates the thickness of the pavement and potential problems with underlying soils. Smith considered three basic repair methods, those being resurfacing, reconstruction, and recycling. Resurfacing consists of patching and milling the roadway as needed, paving leveling binder to smooth out the bumps, then finishing with a 1.5" layer of surface course. Reconstruction is total removal of the existing pavement and construction of a completely new roadway. Recycling consists of pulverizing and mixing the existing bituminous surface with the underlying aggregate, compacting the resulting mix to form the new roadway base, then paving 4" of asphalt. Any of these methods could be used if we needed to widen the road. Smith also evaluated roads regarding width, drainage, and operational problems. The minimum standard was a 22' wide roadway with roadside swales. Smith found that the wider pavement was achievable in most cases, the exceptions being Van Emmon(Adams to Morgan) and Center Street. Roadside swales would function well in most areas, but need to be supplemented with new storm sewers to provide adequate drainage. Smith also recommended that the Adams Street connection to Van Emmon be eliminated. Their recommendations are summarized in Exhibit 5 of the report. We had previously identified some areas where new watermain should be constructed before the roadway work begins. Those watermains need to be replaced due to deterioration, inadequate size, and/or age. Those locations are Washington (east of Mill), Fox (east of Mill), Heustis (Fox—Hydraulic), and Adams (Hydraulic— Van Emmon). The estimated cost of constructing storm sewers and watermains is about $1,050,000. This work would be done in Year 1 of the project. The roadway work, estimated to be $1,720,000, would be done in Year 2. Smith also prepared (for comparison purposes only) estimates for total reconstruction of these roadways. Those reconstruction cost estimates total about $4,500,000. Please place this item on the February 24, 2003 Public Works Committee meeting for consideration. rt Yorkville Road Program 18-Feb-03 Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Reconstruction Reconstruction Street Terminii Roadway Cost Storm Sewer Cost Watermain Cost Total Cost Roadway Cost Total Cost Hydraulic Adams- Morgan $53,270 $22,844 $0 $76,114 $109,650 $132,494 Van Emmon State- Morgan $99,647 $41,000 $0 $140,647 $196,800 $237,800 Madison Main- Morgan $139,608 $57,437 $0 $197,045 $275,700 $333,137 Morgan Hydraulic-Van Emmon $43,951 $33,744 $0 $77,695 $85,470 $119,214 Adams Hydraulic-Ridge $147,756 $69,875 $52,075 $269,706 $294,900 $416,850 Mill Fox-Hydraulic $366,000 $71,875 $0 $437,875 $366,000 $437,875 Heustis Fox-Hydraulic $164,314 $82,725 $109,145 $356,184 $356,580 $548,450 Fox East of Mill $99,976 $40,500 $55,225 $195,701 $180,900 $276,625 Washington East of Mill $89,641 $35,188 $46,850 $171,679 $155,400 $237,438 Orange Bridge- Mill $137,079 $80,125 $0 $217,204 $335,100 $415,225 Colton Main-Somonauk $129,115 $80,581 $0 $209,696 $332,790 $413,371 Liberty Main-Park $159,401 $111,671 $0 $271,072 $455,025 $566,696 Center Bridge-Liberty $88,550 $60,375 s0 $148,925 280800 $341,175 Totals $1,718,308 $787,940 $263,295 $2,769,543 $3,425,115 $4,476,350 Note: Costs include 10%contingency and 15%for engineering. Smith Engineering Consultants, Inc. Civil/Structural Engineers and Surveyors Illinois Texas Wisconsin 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS PREPARED FOR: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Job No. YORK-020405-2 January 17, 2003 Revised January 31, 2003 Revised February 14, 2003 Prepared By: Smith Engineering Consultants, Inc 759 John Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Phone: (630) 553-7560 759 John Street,Yorkville,IL 60560 www.smithengineering.com Telephone 630.553.7560 Fax 630.553.7646 r TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4-5 ANALYSIS 6-7 RECOMMENDATIONS 8-15 COST ANALYSIS 16 LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT NO. LOCATION MAP 1 SECTION ONE EXHIBIT 2 SECTION TWO EXHIBIT 3 SECTION THREE EXHIBIT 4 SUMMARY TABLE 5 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 6 SOIL BORING GRAPHICS 7 OPINION OF COST 8 • 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2 YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Yorkville has decided to conduct an engineering study to recommend improvements to various roadways located within the city limits. This particular study focuses on the following roadways: .4.S treet °. . .t.. k s ;•,11 . . . ,. .Limits r y ,'.` Z, . Section One Hydraulic Avenue Adams Street to Morgan Street Van Emmon Street State Street to Morgan Street Madison Street Main Street to Morgan Street Morgan Street Hydraulic Avenue to just past Van Emmon Street Adams Street Hydraulic Avenue to Ridge Street Section Two Mill Street Fox Street to Hydraulic Avenue Heustis Street Fox Street to Hydraulic Avenue Fox Street Mill Street to East End Washington Street Mill Street to East End Orange Street IL Route 47 to Mill Street Section Three Colton Street Main Street to Somonauk Street Liberty Street Main Street to Park Street Center Street IL Route 47 to Liberty Street Section One is located south of the Fox River, west of Illinois Route 47, and north of Fox Road. Section Two is located south of the Fox River, east of Illinois Route 47, and north of Illinois Route 126. Section Three is located north of the Fox River, east of Illinois Route 47, and south of Somonauk Street. (See Exhibit 1). The purpose of this study is to determine pavement rehabilitation options, drainage options, and various watermain improvements for the listed streets. The alignment of Van Emmon Street will also be analyzed and recommendations provided. A brief field survey was conducted to determine lengths and widths of the individual streets. For each of the listed streets, one pavement core per block was taken and analyzed to determine the existing pavement structure. Also, drainage features and structures were located, but a detailed topographic survey was not completed. The City provided a contour map for the area south of the Fox River, while USGS maps were utilized for the area north of the Fox River. 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 3 YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 • EXISTING CONDITIONS Right-off Way The existing right-of-way was researched utilizing the 2001 Edition of the Kendall County Tax Map Atlas. The existing right-of-way is a limiting factor in regards to the extent of drainage and watermain improvements to various streets. The existing right-of-way widths for each of the subject streets for the study area are listed in the table below: Street ; ; Right-of Way:'Widths --- Section One Hydraulic Avenue 66 Feet Van Emmon Street 60 Feet Madison Street 50 Feet Morgan Street 50 Feet Adams Street 60 Feet Section Two Mill Street 50 Feet Heustis Street 50 Feet Fox Street 60 Feet Washington Street 60 Feet Orange Street 60 Feet Section Three Colton Street 66 Feet Liberty Street 60 Feet Center Street 66 Feet Pavement Conditions Existing pavement structures were determined by analyzing data collected from obtaining pavement cores (one per block). In general, the pavement cores revealed that the existing bituminous surface and binder courses were in poor to fair condition. The majority of the existing base courses were silty clay with traces of sand and gravel. Additional infoiuiation is located in the soils report written by Schleede Hampton Associates, Inc. as attached in Appendix A. Roadway Conditions A brief field survey was conducted to determine the existing pavement widths and lengths. These widths were compared to the minimum pavement width as listed in the City of Yorkville's Subdivision Ordinances. As listed in the Standard Specifications for Improvements, local residential streets are to be bound with B-6.12 concrete curb and gutter to a width of 30 feet from back of curb to back of curb. This results in a pavement width of 27 feet edge to edge. Due to the older nature of the study area, the existing right-of-way limits, trees and utility poles, budget constraints, and a goal to minimize impacts to existing landscaping, a minimum standard width 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 4 YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 ► of 22' feet edge to edge without curb and gutter was chosen as the preferred minimum width. However, it may not be possible to widen every street to meet the minimum standard. The recommended improvements for individual streets are discussed in a later section. Drainage Drainage features and structures were located throughout the project area, even though a detailed topographic survey was not completed. The City provided a contour map for the area south of the Fox River, while USGS maps were utilized for the area north of the Fox River. The existing drainage patterns were studied along with existing drainage conveyance devices. General observations of existing drainage indicate the following conditions: • No defined drainage • Limited storm sewer • Under-utilized storm sewer • Under-sized storm sewer • Edge of pavement erosion on steep slopes Watermain For the purposes of this report, watermain installation was not researched for each street within the study area. The City provided a list of streets that have problems with the existing watermain. These problems include age, maintenance issues and/or poor flows. Existing watermain atlases were reviewed along with future watermain plans developed by the City. The recommended improvements are detailed in a later section. 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 5 YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 p ANALYSIS The engineering analysis of the existing pavement centered around the structural soundness of the existing pavement. Utilizing the pavement core data, a windshield survey of the existing pavement was performed to determine the extent of base failure along each of the roadways. The condition of a flexible pavement (i.e.; asphalt pavement) is only as good as the condition of the pavement base course. If the base is deteriorated or questionable, it is not recommended to resurface the pavement without performing some type of remedial base repair. The pavement core report indicated that the bituminous surface and underlying binder/base courses for all but two cores were in poor condition. At a minimum, this material should be removed and replaced unless the base course is stable. For the majority of the roadways studied, the pavement exhibited greater than 50% base failure. Three types of construction were considered for the rehabilitation of the existing pavement: 1. Simple Resurfacing The simple resurfacing method includes the application of a bituminous leveling binder to achieve the desired crown of the pavement and then resurfaced with 1-1/2 inches of bituminous surface course. Where curb and gutter or excessive pavement crown is present, some milling of the existing surface may be necessary to properly resurface the pavement. The pavement can be widened in this option as well by excavating the area desired and backfilling with aggregate base material and applying a 2" binder course prior to resurfacing. 2. Complete Reconstruction The pavement in this method is completely removed to a sufficient depth to allow for the construction of the City's standard residential pavement section (10 inches of aggregate base course, 2-1/2 inches of bituminous binder course and 1-1/2 inches of bituminous surface course). 3. Cold In-place Recycling The recycling method involves the pulverization of the existing pavement to a depth of approximately 6-8 inches. Once pulverized, the material is re-shaped and compacted to form a normal crown and then it is resurfaced with 2-1/2 inches of bituminous binder mix and 1-1/2 inches of bituminous surface mix. If widening is required, the area to be widened is excavated to a depth of 15 to 18 inches prior to the pulverization process and filled with compacted granular base course material. The degree of improvement is directly correlated to the expected design life of the pavement. With a simple resurfacing, the expected life of the pavement is contingent upon the integrity of the existing pavement beneath it. This method should only be used when the integrity of the pavement base is intact. The reconstruction of a pavement should yield the desired design life expectancy since the base and surface courses are completely removed and replaced with virgin materials. A hybrid of these two options is the cold in-place recycling option in which the pulverized pavement is used as the "new" base course and is then resurfaced with virgin material. In this option, the pavement base is compacted to a design specification thus restoring 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 6 YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 its structural integrity. This hybrid method is an efficient, cost effective method to construct a solid base course when the resurfacing option is not recommended due to poor base conditions. The measure by which a pavement's structural strength is measured is through its structural number. This is an empirical calculation of each of the material properties in a pavement section. For a minor residential street as defined in the City's Subdivision Control Ordinance, the structural number is equal to 2.75 for a 20 year design life. If the pavement were to be reconstructed, the new pavement would be designed to meet this standard. In a maintenance type design, the structural number is less relevant as the purpose of the maintenance operation is to extend the life of the pavement to the extent practical. An assumption was made, however, that the minimum design life for a maintenance improvement would be 10 years. The analysis of the existing drainage systems was limited to the field observation of the facilities and some limited survey to determine if adequate depth was available to tie into existing structures. The intent of the analysis was to be able to make some general recommendations as to what level of improvement was needed for each segment of roadway under study. It is apparent that there are definite needs for the improvement of the storm water system in the original areas of the City. There is a lack of records documenting the available infrastructure in the original parts of the City both north and south of the Fox River. As a general recommendation, the City should invest in the development of an overall storm water infrastructure atlas and then conduct an overall study to determine what improvements should be made to rectify any existing drainage issues. This study could be coupled with the City's watermain improvement plan and coordinated with the improvement to the roadways. The recommendations for improvement to the watermain system were deteiinined by the City Engineer and are reported as such in the next section. The improvements were based on the age and maintenance history of the existing infrastructure in the vicinity of the roadways studied. 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 7 YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations made as part of this report are geared toward improving the roadways to meet the minimum pavement design criteria set forth by the city to achieve a minimum design life of 10 years and to address drainage and watermain issues. It is recognized that it is the City's prerogative to determine the scope of the improvements based on budgetary and fiscal constraints. For this reason, we have also included recommendations and associated costs for the full improvement of the sub-standard roads should the City desire to expand the scope of improvement or delay the improvement until funding is available. In most instances, a maintenance type improvement is recommended which includes the widening of the existing pavement to a minimum width of 22' and the repair of the pavement base prior to resurfacing. Drainage improvements are recommended on all streets and water main improvements are recommended where necessary. The City has the option to apply their MFT funds towards a maintenance or construction type improvement depending on the scope of work and meeting applicable policies set forth by IDOT. The City can elect to use their own funds toward the various roadway improvements and not have to follow the MFT policies. In this case the standards used will be based on good engineering judgment and the approval of the City Engineer. In a maintenance improvement, the use of MFT funds is limited to items such as simple resurfacing, shoulder repairs, minor ditch/storm sewer improvements or other improvements intended to extend the life of the existing facility. In a maintenance improvement substandard street widths and other substandard elements are allowed to remain, recognizing the fact that the first priority is to preserve the life of the roadway facility. Minimum resurfacing thicknesses and certain policies need to be met to classify the improvement as a maintenance improvement. If an improvement involves the widening of the roadway, modification of the pavement base structure (i.e. reconstruction of the pavement) or any major improvement to the roadway facility, the improvement is classified as a construction section and it must conform to the standards and policies as outlined in IDOT's Local Roads Policy manual. This includes adhering to minimum pavement widths, minimum shoulder widths (or concrete curb and gutter), minimum clear zone, construction of adequate drainage facilities, and construction of standard pavement depths. It also includes the preparation of typical contract plans and specifications, whereas, a maintenance improvement can be constructed with a simple specification booklet. Drainage It is recommended that improving the roadway pavement follow at least one winter season after any storm sewer or watermain construction. This will allow any trenches across the road to properly settle and avoid patching "new" pavement. It is highly recommended that the City conduct a detailed investigation of the existing storm sewers in the areas of interest and obtain detailed topographic information to determine drainage areas. 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 8 YORKVIiLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 The recommended drainage improvements include the construction of new storm sewers to replace old ineffective storm sewers, the extension of existing storm sewers where available and where capacity is available, the improvement of ditches, replacement of driveway culverts and improvement of roadway crowns and ditches, and addition of type A gutters. Section One: Hydraulic Avenue Morgan to Adams: Hydraulic Avenue is approximately 16 feet wide in this segment and it is proposed to widen and resurface the pavement to the standard width of 22 feet and resurface with 1 ''A inches of bituminous surface course and 2 '/2 inches of bituminous binder course. The proposed method of construction is to pulverize and recycle the existing pavement and to widen the pavement by 6' to the north. The pavement cannot be widened to the south due to the presence of the existing railroad tracks. The widening will require the relocation of several utility poles located along the north side of pavement. It is recommended to construct a drainage swale along the north side as well which will drain to existing storm sewers connecting to the Fox River. No watermain improvements are recommended for this segment. Van Emmon Street Morgan to Adams: This segment of Van Emmon Street has a very steep profile that rises as it heads east from Morgan Street. The existing pavement width is 16 feet and it is proposed to remain the same width due to existing terrain constraints. Van Emmon Street is essentially cut out of the side of a severely sloped embankment, with the existing ground higher on the south side and the existing ground falling away to the north. Any pavement widening would require extensive placement of new embankment on the north side and extensive retaining wall construction(2-3' in height) along the south side of the street. The recommended method of construction is to pulverize the existing base and resurface with 1 V2 inches and bituminous surface course and 2 V2 inches of bituminous binder course. The existing guardrail in this segment is substandard and is proposed to be removed and replaced with standard type A guardrail. An existing sidewalk exists along the south side of the road and is in need of moderate repair. It is estimated that approximately 25% of the sidewalk should be removed and replaced. Due to the low volume of traffic along Van Emmon and the residential character of the surrounding area, it is recommended that nothing be done to the existing profile at this time. The profile is substandard (greater than 10% slope) however any re-profiling would require the lowering of the centerline which would adversely affect the two driveways located in this section. Constructing a standard profile would also be 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 9 YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 considered a major reconstruction effort and widening of the road to a standard width would be recommended at the same time. Additional R.O.W. may have to be acquired to achieve the desired cross section. For the reasons cited above regarding the embankment and retaining wall required, a project of this scope should be undertaken as a separate project. No watermain improvements are recommended for this segment. The drainage of this section would be directed toward paved gutters and collected in proposed storm sewers for conveyance to the Fox River. Adams to State The centerline profile of this segment is less undulating than the segment to the west, however, there still exists the same topographical constraints as described above. If the pavement were to be widened, retaining wall and embankment would be required along the south and north sides, respectively. The existing guardrail is recommended to be removed and replaced as in the section to the west. The same method of construction is also recommended keeping the same pavement width. It is recommended that the existing wye intersection with Adams Street be eliminated. The four residences along Adams can be adequately served via the access from Hydraulic Avenue and there appears to be no pressing need to keep it open. The existing intersection presents a potential safety hazard and the owners of the abutting residence should be consulted regarding its closure and possible vacation of right-of-way. Fire/Police consulted. A new access to the west out to Morgan should be investigated. No watermain improvements are recommended for this segment. The drainage of this section would be handled in the same manner as the section to the west. Madison Street Morgan to Adams It is recommended that the existing pavement in this block be widened from its existing width of 14 feet to at least 20 feet which will match the width of the pavement to the east. During the detailed design phase it should be investigated whether a standard 22' wide pavement can be constructed without removing trees or power poles that appear to be in the way. The existing pavement in this section is recommended to be pulverized widened and resurfaced with 1 1/2 inches of bituminous surface course and 2 '/2 inches of bituminous binder course. No watermain improvements are recommended for this segment. Recommended drainage improvements include constructing gentle swales to direct runoff to proposed storm sewers for conveyance to the Fox River. 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 10 YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 Adams to State State to Main These two blocks of Madison Street are similar in nature and the recommended method of improvement is to pulverize the existing pavement and resurface with 1 `/z inches of bituminous surface and 2 '/z inches of bituminous binder course keeping the same width at a minimum (20 feet) or possibly widening it to 22' depending on the location of trees and power poles. No watermain improvements are recommended for this segment. Morgan Street South of Van Emmon to Hydraulic This segment of Morgan Street should be improved to match the existing width of the street to the south which was improved as part of the last street improvement project. The pavement width should be increased by 1.5 feet on each side to achieve 22' wide pavement. The recommended method of construction is to pulverize the existing pavement, widen and resurface with 1 '/2 inches of bituminous surface and 2 `/2 inches of bituminous binder course. Due to the steep grade on Morgan in this segment, it is also recommended to install type A gutter along both edges of pavement to reduce erosion. The gutter would empty in to the proposed storm sewer for conveyance to the Fox River. No watermain improvements are recommended for this segment. Recommended drainage improvements include constructing gentle swales to direct runoff to proposed storm sewers for conveyance to the Fox River. Adams Street Ridge to Madison Madison to Van Emmon Drainage improvements for these two sections would include gentle swales from Ridge to Madison and type A gutter from Madison to Van Emmon directing runoff to the proposed storm sewer for conveyance to the Fox River. The pavement in these two sections is recommended to be widened to 22' from its existing width of 13.5 to 16.5 feet. The existing pavement should be pulverized, reshaped and resurfaced with 2-1/2 inches of bituminous binder and 1-1/2 inches of surface. No watermain improvements are recommended for this segment. Recommended drainage improvements include constructing gentle swales to direct runoff to proposed storm sewers for conveyance to the Fox River. Van Emmon to Hydraulic The pavement in this section is recommended to be widened to 20' from its existing width of 14 feet. The existing pavement should be pulverized, reshaped and resurfaced with 2-1/2 inches of binder and 1-1/2 inches of surface. Drainage of this section would 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 11 YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 be provided by gentle swales to the proposed storm sewer for conveyance to the Fox River. The existing 1" watermain is proposed to be removed and replaced with the standard 8 inch watermain. New services will need to be constructed for the three residences served by this watermain. It should be determined prior to construction whether the new services need to be constructed all the way to the houses or just to the buffalo boxes. Section 2: Mill Street Hydraulic to Van Emmon Van Emmon to Ridge Ridge to Fox The existing pavement along Mill Street is in poor condition and the width of pavement ranges from 18 feet to 22.5 feet. The City plans to install a 16 inch water main along the center of Mill Street in the spring of 2003 as part of the ongoing water main improvement project. Construction of the watermain further degrades the condition of the existing pavement. Therefore, the recommended method of roadway improvement is complete reconstruction with widening, curb and gutter, and storm sewer. There was some discussion regarding the possibility of pursuing Federal Surface Transportation Program Funds (STP) from the Kane County Council of Mayors for this project. The use of these funds requires adherence to more stringent design criteria than MFT funds and the process could take years to accomplish. The STP policies would require a minimum pavement width (31 feet BOC-BOC) and it is evident that any widening along Mill Street will likely require right-of-way acquisition due to the severe side slopes adjacent to the existing roadway. There are advantages to pursuing the federal funds since the City would only have to pay for 20% of the construction cost, however, often overlooked is the cost of right-of-way acquisition and phase I and II engineering which is the sole financial responsibility of the local agency. The time and ability to acquire the necessary right-of-way can be major obstacles that delay a project for years. Our recommendation is to not pursue the STP funding for the improvement of Mill Street but to select another project to contend for this competitive funding source. Heustis Street Fox to Van Emmon Van Emmon to Hydraulic The recommended method of construction for these segments is to grind the existing top 2 inches of bituminous material and replace it with 2-1/2 inches of bituminous binder and 1-1/2 inches of bituminous surface course. The existing width of pavement is sufficient (22') and there is little evidence of complete base failure. Where the base has failed, it is 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 12 YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 recommended to patch the pavement with a full depth class D patch. Scattered curb and gutter exists along the edge of pavement and it is assumed that approximately 300 feet will need to be removed and replaced. It is proposed to remove and replace the existing 4"wateimain on Heustis with an 8" watermain. Services shall also be replaced to the buffalo box connection. Recommended drainage improvements consist of type A gutter from Fox St. to Van Emmon with connection to proposed storm sewers. Fox Street Mill to East End The existing pavement is exhibiting complete base failure and it is recommended to pulverize the existing pavement, widen it to 22' where possible and resurface with 1-1/2 inches of bituminous surface course and 2-1/2 inches of binder course. It is proposed to replace the existing 4" watermain with an 8" main and loop the watermain at the east end of Fox Street with the new watermain at the east end of Washington Street. Appropriate easements will need to be acquired from the homeowners in order to construct and maintain the water main loop. Drainage can be improved in this area by regrading the existing ditch system and replacing and extending driveway culverts and installing permanent erosion control. Washington Street Mill to East End The existing pavement is exhibiting complete base failure and it is recommended to pulverize the existing pavement, widen it to 22' where possible and resurface with 1-1/2 inches of bituminous surface course and 2-1/2 inches of binder course. The existing 4"water main is proposed to be removed and replaced with an 8"watermain and looped with the new watermain on Fox Street. Drainage can be improved in this area by regrading the existing ditch system and replacing and extending driveway culverts and installing permanent erosion control. Orange Street Bridge to Heustis Heustis to Mill The recommended method of construction for these segments is to pulverize the existing pavement, widen it to 22' and resurface with 1-1/2 inches of bituminous surface course and 2-1/2 inches of binder course. No wateinuain improvements are recommended for this segment. 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 13 YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 • Drainage can be improved in this area by regrading the existing ditch system and replacing and extending driveway culverts and utilizing the existing storm sewer system for ditch outlets. Section 3: Colton Street Main to Center Center to Spring Spring to Somonauk The recommended method of construction for these segments is to pulverize the existing pavement, widen it to 22' and resurface with 1-1/2 inches of bituminous surface course and 2-1/2 inches of binder course. No watermain improvements are recommended for this segment. Recommended drainage improvements include constructing gentle swales to direct runoff to the proposed storm sewer for conveyance to the Fox River. Liberty Street Main to Center Center to Spring Spring to Somonauk Somonauk to Park The recommended method of construction for these segments is to pulverize the existing pavement, widen it to 22' and resurface with 1-1/2 inches of bituminous surface course and 2-1/2 inches of binder course. Curb and gutter exists along the east edge of pavement between Spring and Park and the excessive material generated by the pulverization process will have to be removed to allow for the installation of the 4 inches of bituminous material. No watermain improvements are recommended for this segment. Recommended drainage improvements include constructing gentle swales to direct runoff to the proposed storm sewer for conveyance to the Fox River. Center Street Bridge to Colton Colton to Liberty The recommended method of construction for these segments is to grind the existing top 2 inches of bituminous material and replace it with 2-1/2 inches of bituminous binder and 1-1/2 inches of bituminous surface course. The existing width of pavement is sufficient (20') and there is little evidence of complete base failure. Where the base has failed, it is recommended to patch the pavement with a full depth class D patch. 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 14 YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 r � No watermain improvements are recommended for this segment. Recommended drainage improvements include constructing gentle swales to direct runoff to the proposed stoiui sewer for conveyance to the Fox River. Some general drainage recommendations listed by section follow these specific recommendations. Section One: Area west of Route 47 and south of the Fox River—Morgan Street, Adams Street, Main Street, Hydraulic, Van Emmon, Madison. It is recommended to construct a storm sewer along Morgan to the Fox River with legs on Madison and Van Emmon. Sections should be improved to include crowned pavements and swales. Type A gutters are recommended in areas with excessive slopes. Section Two: Area east of Route 47 and south of the Fox River—Orange Street, Heustis Street, Mill Street, Washington Street, Fox Street. It is recommended to extend existing storm sewers along Heustis and Mill. Regrade ditches and improve driveway culverts and Washington. Drain Orange Street to existing storm sewer. Improve roadway sections with crown and swales, type A gutters are recommended on steep slopes on Mill and Heustis. Section Three: Area east of Route 47 north of the Fox River— Somonauk Street, Center Street, Main Street, Colton Street and Liberty Street. This entire area is poorly drained and flat which severely limits the opportunity to utilize ditches. A storm sewer is needed to convey the runoff away. It is recommended to construct a stoini sewer down Liberty Street to outlet at the Fox River with legs along side streets. Roadway sections should be improved to include crowned pavement and swales. The recommended improvements are listed by street and section below. The existing width, length and pavement condition for each street are listed in exhibit 5. 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 15 YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 COST ANALYSIS The recommendations contained in this report represent our opinion of the minimum effort needed to rehabilitate the roadways in the subject areas. These minimums would improve the base structures and widen and resurface the existing roadways as well as improve drainage. We have based our opinion of cost on these assumptions. For comparison, we have also included an opinion of probable cost for total reconstruction of these roadways. Total reconstruction would include removing the existing material, widening to the standard width, installing new base material, installing binder and surface courses, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, drainage improvements, and storm sewer. Our opinion of cost separates the storm sewer and the water main items because these improvements would be needed for both scenarios. Installation of storm sewer main lines from the subject areas to the Fox River is the only available option to provide adequate drainage for these areas. The total opinion of cost for rehabilitation of the subject streets is $1,345,157.93 versus $3,059,100.00 for total reconstruction. These totals do not include $366,000.00 for total reconstruction of Mill Street, $787,940.63 for storm sewer improvements, and $263,295.00 for water main improvements which should be considered a part of both options. 2003 ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 16 YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS February 14,2003 H x w SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANT , INC. prn,/e�octv780SOLlvsfo� lea I.L 55817 70687071 LIMON 58181 Mk 6e0-ee8-7600 FAL mo-eea-nu 86886.8117•0007•=176poom 6-11611c.400•688128668•0•180.088 81671110067 is 107181.17 870R7IIJ.1 =PON PROPTSBIONAL DISKI11 FMK+ 164-000105 x* r ruesvro NEN'L01w1t1 ��JIL E aacks���y : [ r L Park ,t-2C ri � c� E �Orrr.3naL ,t LI VI �._.. 11(E-.,rJ` J L � t Lc, t L F� j-1'rid ((i ;,. ,u 6�t ren; J EI 1 f t1r�r, f,�,�aln 2I I., r«r. RR La' t w 11 • k Firer EIr'ch Dr SECTION #3 ti•ri H iiiraultil A,, j1 jAEl crrt'nc,r, 5r , 6UE11r) (�r�I'vr_rth •rr? 5`orkr'Ifl tr. IA Maed�bcl91 sr __ c art Errrr�r7 �d ,,r} •;‘-e-:. SECTION 1 , SECTION #2 co`. S N ,'4,- (rail Qa3t E - lrar)i9E. ;t. t5' r 3 ;p . 41\ NNIini Cir S_a:C. S' YORK-IiLLE ROAD PROGRAA1 YGIQKVL.La LL1VOIS LOCA TAC W MAP I U11 I IIENSIONS oRASM ex DAM PROJECT Ma r. E 00amft H .SCALL: SHEET NO. I S A MCKIM St %UT.SCALDa N H H x x ri f r ri SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. 0+00 HYDRAULIC EXISl1NGTOMILIC ��� PSC� = 3+02.8 MORGAN TO FOX RIVER 24' TN FOX RIVER ■a ur 3+65.5 HYDRAULIC 02„ fec.a., ' �11 of = 0+00 N. ADAMS PLOT FL& EXISTING o 18' TO FOX RIVER 0 AVE NM PEER 2+84.9 0 R.R. XING 0+13.2 0 R.R. XING SYh UNE CONFLICTS PROPOSED EXISTING 15" T + ® 0 STORM MANHOLE ® O -------- 4 1 STORM CATCH BASIN/INLET 0 • Z CATCH BASIN c = 9.0' TYPICAL PAVEMENT WIDTH FLARED END SECTION t> + 14.0' ---I'_ i PAVED GU I ILKS I STORM SEWER )--- ) -- p 0 DRAINAGE ARROW 0 3+87.0 VAN EMMON PROPOSED STORM SEWER = 5+023 S. ADAMS J x ro W. VAN x 4+81.0 x 6+56.0 fai\ / a t c---c --- —cc o 1 I PAVED GUTTERS INLET L T W/25.H, Ri i INLET W/FLAT GRATE 6+20.3, 12.0' RT.--/ I ---*----- 16.5' (VAN EMMON) 11 I (131.4 tiii INLET.W/BH MH 6+67.9, 14.0' LT. 6+50.1, 21.0' L T. f Q PAVEMENT WID7H = INLET W/ BH CO 25.0' 0 7+80 TO 9+19 0 6+35.9, 16.0' LT. o 3+86.8 MADISON = o Ai) 2+59.9 S. ADAMS N N } ssi 41)::)x0÷.• Ar/AD1SON ST. x 9+19.0 C C — mac I ./i. INLET W/BH c 6+30.3, 21.3' RT. INLET W/BH INLET W/BH (MADISON)1, 25.5' RT. 3+720, 20.0' RT. - 13.5' CL / CL 6+50.1 INLET W/BH 6+69.5, 19.0' RT. 1 US -� X 0+00 S ADAMS $Ec7 W al EXPENT ( I Eva we alae NO.NOM t we OMMOZ a► I-- MAW as�O. s KTS • dpi•1t 1■- mut a ow KIS M H N hr ri __... _ n91QTH�RRI CONSULTANTS. INC.$ . .,.a.o ...�r..w..w... .r�o.�...r...♦...r.� a0a�010 n0n00+aRa BMW MK/tx-10008 CURB INLET ,�,,,0r ,,1 11+98.8, 13.0' RT. ��„n �1 12+16.5 11+88.6x ,'�. . . / I FLAT GRATE �_ 11+96.3 0 R.R. XING 11+47.6, 17.7' RT. 11+69.2 O R.R. XING 0 1 i. +m■ --- 22.5' CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER CONNECT TO EXISTING INLET W/ BHo INLET W/BH STORM SEWER 9+04.9, 17.7 LT. 8+82.5, 20.7' LT. I ,. 8+2Z t x E VAN 5WMCAN ST. x 8+52.8 0 Q / Q INLET W/ BH 7+84.0, 17.5' LT. 0, CURB INLET 1.5X1.5' INLET 7+58.0, 14.0' RT. I I 8+12.2, 15.3' RT. I INLET W/ FLAT GRATE „ PROPOSED STORM SEWER 6+74.3, 17.6' LT. 1.5'X2' INLET 7-5+67.5, 11.2' RT. 18' TI SYAVOL LEGEW •EXISINLET W/ BH -0 2'X3' FLAT INLET 4+19.3, 12.0' T LT. �3+99.3, 13.4 RT. 0 O n STORM MANHOLE 0 e I STORM CATCH BASIN/INLET 0 • x3+74,3R�GE ST. CATCH BASIN c n FLARED END SEC770N t> STORM SEWER )--- )-- 131-11-11 @II-11 "V" GUTTER TY INLET 3+46.0, 12.6' RT. DRAINAGE ARROW ^"— i N / \ I / FOX ST 6+03 x I TO CREEK 0+00 MILL = 0+00 FOX Q• � k. co 0� S1' 0 J 5+18x WAST-IVGTON ST. x 0+00 TO CREEK V 1r INLET W/BH INLET W/ BH 2+03.6, 21.7' LT. INLET W/ BH 9+01.6, 23.0' RT. 7+12.7, 19.1' RT. 0i INLET W/ BH N J�( 6+22.8, 18.9' RT. \ x 0+00 ` Ii'=�rLef4 - I����.. a.. x 11+17 Jl 1 INLET W/ BH INLET W/BH INLET W/BH INLET W/BH 5+61.5, 21.5' RT 7+96.8, 20.3' RT. 2+04.3, 22.1' RT. 2+33.9, 22.4' RT. CURB INLET 7+63.1 O C / ,' YORKVL.LE ROAD PROGRAM 0+20.4, 29.4' RT. MH YOIRKVLLE LLIVOS 0+23.5, 30.2' RT. SECnON s#2 E O- T taws emu ren DAM! ONO. s onson Nora ICN. 11 .?Na air MT& 4 GEOID S'* yin 110Ala _4 aer N.T.S. N x ri 3MJS '1H34 ;f.8 ammo 213412! X03 '0N Mt ams ' H 1.8 311930 z 3H1 Ol , . S0t0Z0 Ha' 7 :. SOH 1031'021d 3L`- ;1.8 DORM MHO , D Rf f ` J - — II6 -L 2 e# NOLLQ.2S f1 x-----004-0 '1S x---00-1-0 WIN S/ONT1 (g77P1>d0 ( C • /' r . w a OVOat g771A>12f0A ,o'sc /,‘, 1 1S 213LN39 83413S maims 03SOd02/d y 17 ,i-'91 "11-'69+* .� H8/M 1.37M ,0'1Z 17 ,F OZ 0'69+£ ('�H8/M 137N1 77 ,09 HB�M 137N1_� C �` r• +2 1S.1213817 6'99+4' ILS 5`b+S o\ o• IN X 1S AMIGO 00+0 c J Q 0'94'+6 x of to C: "�H8 Al 137N/91+i� / 979+C O ' I ) r :"•1 Is_ ' £L1 12/,Z'61 'SL'15+9 ,0',"1 77 ,9'Ll r99+1, C HO/M 137N1 H8/M 137N1 • C: • • ^ 0 17,L L `9'99+9 121.f I Z9'+9 O 12/ ,971e 9Z'09+L')3-- y 1 vi /1.11.37N1 H8/M 137N1 137N/ Gym � ©� J � x 3 / 3J gm-FL .LS O Yl1GK7J 0 17/721 ,0'0 '9L'16-FL ( '''' /3 69+LO 12/ ,4"14' 9L'S6+L7 MYV 137N/ 82/170 i • ,0'1Z 1 ,991 C, I :LH ,0-Ll '0'16+01 j y 137N1 821f10 / y •\ 2 I x3 /35'51+11 1S X7VAIOINOS 33/3 £60+11 . j --- • ►'31►►V ,0.91 --C— --c— • 4 NUL=GPO(13211eld • _ 1#15118 1011e0 • e 1-THAVSY13 'GIVJ MIMS • • 37WIVm IRE .Ls 9 I 8 =MIST—BMW argearrovrg 2 3/ 3 SL91+yl x 1S ,,,,,c, � J 13n0(07 ;4 3t1 ....o.4..71J 107d \ 1.-•"'"" 5Px•£-00, 371.1 VICO IMIMIMMEIMMINIIIMMININV 90T000-/'4T # 1u was= munsszioad mem \\ 11 trILS3311• ZSRlIIIH■ =max■ 7 i a 11 aa 9194—S99-0C200904! 'Ed ZLIZUS KROf 041 SZOLIA3IIS an samshThDla 7T81UMIIg3S/11d13 'DNI s1NyUuhSNO3 ONTaaHisa i HSS ! x , A H x �C ri t r SUMMARY TABLE Evidence Proposed Pavement Pavement Pavement Structural Core of Base Proposed Width of Watermain Recommended Type of MFT Section Street Name Segment Width Length Condition Number Number_ Failure Widening Widening Proposed Drainage Improvements Improvements Construction Type Section#1 Hydraulic Avenue Morgan to Adams 16 365.5 Poor 1.6 Cl 80% Y _ 6(N) Gutter on north EOP N _Pulcerize and resurface Construction Van Emmon Street ,Morgan to Adams 16 387 Fair 1.54 C3 80% N 0 Swales with gutter at Adams and at Morgan N Pulverize and resurface Construction Adams to State 16 269 Poor 2.31 C2 50% N 0 Swales N Pulverize and resurface Construction Madison Street Morgan to Adams 14 386.6 Poor 1.83 C9 60% Y 6-8 Swales N Pulverize and resurface Construction Adams to State 20 263.3 Poor 1.61 C7 60% Maybe 0-2 Swales N Pulverize and resurface Construction State to Main 20 268.9 Poor 0.91 C8 50% Maybe 0-2 CC&G on N. EOP, slope pavement to north N. Pulverize and resurface Construction ` Morgan Street Van Emmon to Hydraulic 19 302.8 Poor/Fair 1.28/5.31 C11/C10 50% Y 3 .Gutter along E&W EOP N Pulverize and resurface Construction Adams Street Ridge to Madison 14 259.9 Poor 0.91 C6 80% Y 8 Swale N Pulverize and resurface Construction Madison to Van Emmon 16 242.4 Poor 1.28 C5 80% Y 6 Swale and Gutter at Van Emmon N Pulverize and resurface Construction Van Emmon to Hydraulic 14 481 Poor 1.39 C4 80% Y 8 Swales Y Pulverize and resurface Construction Section#2 Mill Street Fox to Ridge 18 . 374.3 Poor 1.42 C17 40% TBD TBD TBD Y TBD with watermain project Ridge to Van Emmon 18 478.5 Poor 1.65 C16 40% TBD TBD TBD Y TBD with watermain project Van Emmon to Hydraulic 22 363.7 Poor 2.41 C15 40% TBD TBD TBD Y TBD with watermain project Heustis Street Fox to Van Emmon 22-24 827 Poor/Poor 1.59/1.63 C14/C13 10% N 0 1CC&G along E&W EOP Y Mill and resurface Maintenance Van Emmon to Hydraulic 22-24 361.6 Poor 1.52 C12 60% N 0 Swales Y Pulverize and resurface Maintenance Fox Street Mill to East End 18 603 Poor 0.80 C18 . 70% Y 4 Swales Y Pulverize and resurface Construction Washington Street Mill to East End 18 518 Poor 0.96 C19 70% Y 4 Swales Y Pulverize and resurface Construction Orange Street Route 47 to Heustis 20 763.1 Poor/Poor 1.19/1.27 C22/C21 60% Y 2 Swales N Pulverize and resurface Construction ` Heustis to Mill 20 353.9 Poor 1.05 C20 50% Y 2 Swales N Pulverize and resurface Construction Section#3 Colton Street Main to Center 19 385.6 Poor 1.2950% Q Y 3 Swales N Pulverize and resurface Construction Center to Spring 15 383.8 Poor 3.21 C24 60% Y 7 Swales N Pulverize and resurface Construction Spring to Somonauk 16 339.9 Poor 1.45 C25 50% Y 6 Swales N .Pulverize and resurface Construction Liberty Street Main to Center 21 385.9 Poor 2.18 C29 50% Y 1 Swales N Pulverize and resurface Construction Center to Spring 17 391.4 Poor 1.89 C28 50% Y 5 Swales N Pulverize and resurface Construction Sping to Somonauk 21 338.3 Poor 1.29 C27 60% Y 1 Swales N Pulverize and resurface Construction Somonauk to Park 16 401.3 Poor 1.19 C26 80% Y 6(W) Swales N Pulverize and resurface Construction Center Street Route 47 to Colton 20 391 Poor 2.50 C31 20% N 0 Swales N Mill and resurface Maintenance Colton to Liberty 20 545 Poor 1.93 C30 60% N 0 Swales N -Mill and resurface Maintenance F x �c w • • SCm, • 1 • SOC INC CONSULTING ENGINEERS •• • • • • i • CIVIL • GEOTECHNICAL • CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS • CONSULTANTS • • 1 SCHLEEDE AM i } Y - N} ASSOCa �` q�. INC CONSULI TTG ENGINEERS November 8, 2002 Ms. Camie Ferrier Smith Engineering Consultants, Inc. 759 John Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Re: Pavement Exploration Yorkville 2002 Road Program Yorkville, Illinois SHA File No. 82353 Dear Ms. Ferrier: This letter will serve to summarize our pavement exploration program conducted for the referenced project. Field Explorations and Project Description Our exploration program consisted of making and thirty-one (31) pavement cores for streets scheduled for resurfacing. For details of the pavement core locations, refer to the attached "Pavement Core Measurement and Condition" data sheet. West Section Streets Resurface Streets - Hydraulic, Van Emmon, Adams, Morgan Pavement Cores C-1 through C-6, C-10, C-11 The existing pavement sections encountered for these streets generally consist of 1-1/2 inches to 7 inches of Class I Bituminous Surface and Binder Courses, placed in singular to multiple lifts. The bituminous sections are underlain to the subgrade by an asphalt section approximately 3-5/8 inches thick in core C- 5, and by a cement section approximately 1-5/8 inches thick in core C-6. Granular Base Course layers approximately 1-1/2 inches to 38-1/8 inches thick underlie the bituminous layers in the remaining cores. The granular layer is underlain by an additional Bituminous Surface Course approximately 3/4 of a n inch thick in core C-3, which in turn is underlain by an additional Granular Base Course approximately 8-1/4 inches thick and extending to the subgrade. The subgrade soil encountered beneath the pavement for these streets was brown Clayey SAND in core C-1, and brown and gray Silty CLAY and Sandy Clay in all other coring locations. CORPORATE OFFICE LABORATORY LABORATORY FROM/ 3966 WEST DAYTON STREET,SUITE D 1612 LANDMEIER ROAD,UNIT C 3966 WEST DAYTON STREET,SUITE A REPLY O McHENRY,ILLINOIS 60050-8376 0 ELK GROVE VILLAGE,ILLINOIS 60007-2463 , McHENRY,ILLINOIS 60050-8376 TO: 815-578-8900•FAX:815-578-8862 847-228-1079•FAX:847-228-0633 815-385-8351 •FAX:815-385-8456 SCHLEEDE HAMPTON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS Resurface Streets - Madison Pavement Cores C-7 through C-9 The existing pavement section encountered for these streets consists of 1 -1/2 inches to 2-5/8 inches of Bituminous Surface and Binder Courses, placed i n multiple lifts, over 1-1/2 inches to 2 inches of Granular Base Course. The granular sections are underlain by a secondary Bituminous Surface Course, approximately 1-1/2 to 2 inches thick, which in turn is underlain by a secondary Granular Base Course approximately 1 inch to 11-3/4 inches thick, and extending to the subgrade in cores C-8 and C-9. An additional Bituminous Surface Course approximately 2 inches is present below the secondary granular layer in core C-9, which in turn is underlain by an additional Granular Base Course approximately 12 inches thick and extending to t h e subgrade. The subgrade soil encountered beneath the pavement for these streets was brown Clayey SAND in core C-9, and brown and gray Silty CLAY in both of t h e other coring locations. East Section Streets Resurface Streets - Heustis, Mill, Fox, Washington, Orange Pavement Cores C-12 through C-22 The existing pavement sections encountered for these streets consists of 1-1/2 inches to 8 inches of Bituminous Surface and Binder Courses, placed i n multiple lifts, over 4 inches to 22 inches of Granular Base Course. The granular base course consisted of brown SAND and GRAVEL, with crushed Limestone present predominantly in the upper part of the granular section i n core C-5 and exclusively in the granular layer in core C-18. An asphalt layer was found between the bituminous and granular sections in core C-12 a n d between the granular section and subgrade soil in core C-17. The subgrade soil encountered beneath the pavement for these streets was brown and gray Silty CLAY and Sandy CLAY at all core locations. Northwest Section Streets Resurface Streets — Colton, Liberty, and Center Borings C-23 through C-31 The existing pavement sections encountered for these streets consist of 1 inch to 5-1/8 inches of Bituminous Surface and Binder Courses, placed in singular to multiple lifts, over 2-3/4 inches to 33-7/8 inches of Granular Base Course. The granular base course consisted of brown SAND and GRAVEL, with crushed stone present in the upper part of the granular section in core C-27. A n asphalt layer approximately 3/4 of an inch thick is present below the initial granular section in core C-25, which in turn is underlain by an additional Granular Base Course approximately 7 inches thick and extending to t h e subgrade. The subgrade soils encountered beneath the pavement for these streets was brown Gravelly SAND in cores C-24 and C- 28, and brown and gray Silty CLAY and Sandy CLAY at all other core locations. 2 SCHLEEDE HAMPTON ASSOCIATES, INC, CONSULTING ENGINEERS Closure Thank you for the opportunity to be of continuing service. Please contact m e with any questions you have regarding this data. Very truly yours, SCHLEEDE-HAMPTON ASSOCIATES,INC. ( .,:44 I 4 Gregory J. Sc)haertl. Staff Engineer ,„ William J. Wyzgala, P.E. Project Engineer GJS/WJW/rlh Attachments: Pavement Core Data, C-1 through C-31 3 PAVEMENT CORE MEASUREMENTS.AND CONDITION YORKVILLE 2002 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS YORK-020405-2 SHA PROJECT NO. 82353 Core No. C-1 IDOT Struc. Location Hydraulic, 180' E of Morgan Street, 4' from Center Line, Westbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 1/2 1 1/2 Class I, poor condition, some air voids 0.30 0.45 Bit. Binder Course 1 1/2 to 3 1 1/2 Poor condition 0.25 0.38 Granular Base Course 3 to 5 2 Brown crushed stone 0.10 0.20 Road Mix 5 to 8 3 Aggregate and asphalt Mix 0.11 0.33 Granular Base Course 8 to 1 1 3 Brown crushed stone 0.08 0.24 Subgrade 11+ Dark Brown Clayey SAND, some Gravel, Mc=17% Total 1 .27 Core No. C-2 IDOT Struc. Location Van Emmon, 133' W of State Street, 4' from Center Line, Eastbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.l Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 5/8 1 5/8 Class I, poor condition 0.30 0.49 Granular Base Course 1 5/8 to 1 4 12 3/8 Crushed limestone 0.10 1 .24 Road Mix 1 4 to 1 6 2 Aggregate and asphalt Mix 0.1 1 0.22 Granular Base Course 1 6 to 2 2 6 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.36 Subgrade 22+ Grey Silty CLAY, trace Sand and Gravel, Mc=19% Total 2.31 Core No. C-3 IDOT Struc. Location Van Emmon, 195' E of Morgan Street, 3' from Center Line, Westbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 1/2 1 1/2 Class I, fair condition 0.30 0.45 Granular Base Course 1 1/2 to 7 3/4 6 1/4 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.08 0.50 Bit. Surface Course 7 3/4 to 8 1/2 3/4 Poor condition 0.12 0.09 Granular Base Course 8 1/2 to 16 3/4 8 1/4 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.50 Subgrade 16 3/4+ Dark Brown Sandy CLAY, trace Gravel, Mc=17% Total 1.54 PAVEMENT CORE MEASUREMENTS AND CONDITION YORKVILLE 2002 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS YORK-020405-2 SHA PROJECT NO. 82353 Core No. C-4 !DOT Struc. Location Adams, 130' S of Hydraulic Avenue, 3' from center Line, Southbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 1/2 1 1/2 Class I, poor condition, many air voids 0.30 0.45 Bit. Surface Course 1 1/2 to 4 2 1/2 Class I, poor condition, some air voids 0.23 0.58 Granular Base Course 4 to 10 6 Misc. SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.36 Subgrade 10+ Dark Brown Silty CLAY, trace Sand and Gravel, Mc=30% Total 1.39 • Core No. C-5 IDOT Struc. Location Adams 122' N of Madison Street, 4' from Center Line, Northbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 1 Class I, poor condition 0.30 0.30 Bit. Binder Course 1 to 2 5/8 1 5/8 Class I, poor condition 0.25 0.41 Bit. Surface Course 2 5/8 to 3 3/8 3/4 Class I, poor condition 0.23 0.17 Asphalt Road Mix 3 3/8 to 7 3 5/8 Poor condition 0.11 0.40 Subgrade 7 to 9 2 Grey Silty CLAY, trace Sand and Gravel Total 1 .28 Subgrade 9+ Brown Silty CLAY, trace Sand and Gravel, Mc=27% Core No. C-6 IDOT Struc. Location Adams, 130' S of Madison Street, 3' from Center Line, Southbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 1/8 1 1/8 Class I, poor condition, some air voids 0.30 0.34 Bit. Surface Course 1 1/8 to 3 1/8 2 Poor condition 0.12 0.24 PCC Base 3 1/8 to 4 3/4 1 5/8 Poor condition 0.20 0.33 Subgrade 4 3/4+ Grey Sandy CLAY, trace Gravel, Mc=18% Total 0.90 PAVEMENT CORE MEASUREMENTS AND CONDITION YORKVILLE 2002 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS YORK-020405-2 SHA PROJECT NO. 82353 Core No. C-7 IDOT Struc. Location Madison, 133' W of State Street, 5' from Center Line, Westbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 1 Class I, poor condition 0.30 0.30 Bit. Surface Course 1 to 2 1/8 1 1/8 Class B, poor condition 0.17 0.19 Bit. Surface Course 2 1/8 to 2 5/8 1 /2 Poor condition 0.12 0.06 Granular Base Course 2 5/8 to 4 1/8 1 1/2 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.09 Bit. Surface Course 4 1/8 to 6 1/4 2 1/8 Fair condition ,0.12 0.26 Granular Base Course 6 1/4 to 1 8 11 3/4 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.71 Subgrade 18+ Brown Silty CLAY, trace Sand and Gravel, Mc=27% Total 1 .60 Core No. C-8 IDOT Struc. Location Madison, 135' W of South Main Street, 6' from Center Line, Eastbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 1/8 1 1/8 Class B, poor condition 0.23 0.26 Bit. Surface Course 1 1/8 to 2 7/8 Poor condition 0.12 0.11 Granular Base Course 2 to 4 2 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.12 Bit. Surface Course 4 to 5 1/2 1 1/2 0.12 0.18 Granular Base Course 5 1/2 to 9 1/2 4 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.24 Subgrade 9 1/2+ Grey Silty CLAY, trace Sand and Gravel, Mc=26% Total 0.90 Core No. C-9 IDOT Struc. Location Madison, 195' W of Adams Street, 4' from Center Line, Eastbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 3/4 3/4 Class I, poor condition 0.30 0.23 Bit. Binder Course 3/4 to 1 1/2 3/4 Class I, poor condition 0.25 0.19 Granular Base Course 1 1/2 to 3 1 1/2 Crushed Limestone 0.10 0.15 Bit. Surface Course 3 to 5 2 Class B, poor condition 0.12 0.24 Granular Base Course 5 to 6 1 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.06 Bit. Surface Course 6 to 8 2 Class I, poor condition 0.12 0.24 Granular Base Course 8 to 20 1 2 Brown Clayey SAND, some Gravel, Mc=16% 0.06 0.72 Total 1 .82 PAVEMENT CORE MEASUREMENTS AND CONDITION YORKVILLE 2002 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS YORK-020405-2 SHA PROJECT NO. 82353 Core No. C-10 IDOT Struc. Location Morgan, 153' S of Hydraulic avenue, 5' from Center Line, Northbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 5/8 1 5/8 Class I, fair condition 0.30 0.49 Bit. Binder Course 1 5/8 to 6 7/8 5 1/4 Class I, fair condition 0.25 1 .31 Granular Base Course 6 7/8 to 42 35 1/8 Crushed Limestone 0.10 3.51 Subgrade 42+ Dark Brown Silty CLAY, some Sand, trace Gravel, Mc=19% Total 5.31 Core No. C-11 IDOT Struc. Location Morgan, 62' S of Van Emmon Street, 5' from Center Line, Southbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 2 5/8 2 5/8 Class I, poor condition 0.30 0.79 Granular Base Course 2 5/8 to 8 3/4 6 1/8 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.08 0.49 Subgrade 8 3/4+ Brown Silty CLAY, some Sand, trace Gravel, Mc=19% Total 1 .28 Core No. C-12 IDOT Struc. Location Heustis, 170' S of East Hydraulic Avenue, 4' from Center Line, Southbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 3/4 3/4 Class I, poor condition 0.30 0.23 Bit. Surface Course 3/4 to 1 3/4 1 Class B, poor condition 0.17 0.17 Bit. Binder Course 1 3/4 to 2 1/2 3/4 Poor condition 0.20 0.15 Asphalt Road Mix 2 1/2 to 8 5 1/2 Aggregate and asphalt Mix 0.11 0.61 Granular Base Course 8 to 14 6 Misc. SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.36 Subgrade 14+ Brown and Grey Silty CLAY with SAND, Mc=19% Total 1.51 l PAVEMENT CORE MEASUREMENTS AND.CONDITION YORKVILLE 2002 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS YORK-020405-2 SHA PROJECT NO. 82353 Core No. C-13 IDOT Struc. Location Heustis, 278' S of Van Emmon Street, 7' from Center Line, Northbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 7/8 7/8 Poor condition 0.30 0.26 Bit. Surface Course 7/8 to 2 3/8 1 1/2 Class I, poor condition 0.23 0.35 I Bit. Surface Course 2 3/8 to 4 1 5/8 Class 1, poor condition 0.23 0.37 Bit. Surface Course 4 to 5 1/4 1 1/4 Class, poor condition 0.23 0.29 Granular Base Course 5 1/4 to 11 1/4 6 Dark Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.36 Subgrade 11 1/4+ Brown and Grey Silty CLAY, trace Sand and Gravel, Mc=21% Total 1 .63 Core No. C-14 IDOT Struc. Location Heustis, 278' N of Fox Street, 8' from Center Line, Southbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 1 Poor condition 0.30 0.30 Bit. Surface Course 1 to 3 2 Class I, poor condition 0.23 0.46 Bit. Surface Course 3 to 3 1/2 1 /2 Class B, poor condition 0.17 0.09 Bit. Surface Course 3 1/2 to 4 1/2 1 Poor condition 0.23 0.23 Granular Base Course 4 1/2 to 1 3 8 1/2 Dark Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.51 Subgrade 13+ Brown and Grey Silty CLAY, trace Sand and Gravel, Mc=20% Total 1.59 Core No. C-15 IDOT Struc. Location Mill, 200' N of Van Emmon Street, 6' from Center Line, Southbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 1/2 1 1/2 Class I, poor condition 0.30 0.45 Granular Base Course 1 1/2 to 17 1/2 1 6 Crushed Limestone 0.10 1.60 Granular Base Course 17 1/2 to 23 1/2 6 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.36 Subgrade 23 1/2+ Grey Silty CLAY, some Sand, trace Gravel, Mc=17% Total 2.41 PAVEMENT CORE MEASUREMENTS AND CONDITION YORKVILLE 2002 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS YORK-020405-2 SHA PROJECT NO. 82353 Core No. C-16 IDOT Struc. Location Mill Street, 239' S of East Ridge Street, 5' from Center Line, Northbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 1/2 1 1/2 Poor condition 0.30 0.45 Bit. Surface Course 1 1/2 to 3 1/2 2 Class I, poor condition 0.23 0.46 Granular Base Course 3 1/2 to 9 5 1/2 Crushed Limestone 0.08 0.44 Granular Base Course 9 to 14 5 Misc.SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.30 Subgrade 14+ Brown and Grey Sandy CLAY, trace Gravel, Mc=17% Total 1 .65 Core No. C-17 IDOT Struc. Location Mill, 186' N of Fox Street, 5' from Center Line, Southbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.1 Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 3/8 3/8 Poor condition 0.30 0.11 Bit. Surface Course 3/8 to 1 1/4 7/8 Class I, poor condition 0.23 0.20 Bit. Surface Course 1 1/4 to 2 3/4 Class B, poor condition 0.17 0.13 Bit. Surface Course 2 to 4 2 Class I, poor condition 0.23 0.46 Bit. Binder Course 4 to 5 1 Class B, poor condition 0.17 0.17 Granular Base Course 5 to 9 4 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.24 Asphalt Road Mix 9 to 10 1 Aggregate and asphalt Mix 0.11 0.11 Subgrade 1 0+ Brown Sandy CLAY, some Gravel, Mc=11% Total 1 .42 Core No. C-18 IDOT Struc. Location Fox, 302' E of Mill street, 4' from Center Line, Eastbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 3/4 3/4 Class I, poor condition 0.30 0.23 Bit. Binder Course 3/4 to 2 1 1/4 Class B, poor condition 0.17 0.21 Granular Base Course 2 to 6 1/2 4 1/2 Crushed Limestone 0.08 0.36 Subgrade 6 1/2+ Grey Silty CLAY, trace Sand, some Gravel, Mc=14% Total 0.80 PAVEMENT CORE MEASUREMENTS AND CONDITION YORKVILLE 2002 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS YORK-020405-2 SHA PROJECT NO. 82353 Core No. C-19 IDOT Struc. Location Washington, 156' E of Mill Street, 4' from Center Line, Eastbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 3/4 3/4 Class I, poor condition 0.30 0.23 Bit. Binder Course 3/4 to 1 3/4 1 Class B, poor condition 0.25 0.25 Granular Base Course 1 3/4 to 7 3/4 6 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.08 0.48 Subgrade 7 3/4+ Dark Grey Silty CLAY, trace Sand and Gravel, Mc = 20% Total 0.96 Core No. C-20 IDOT Struc. Location Orange, 175' W of Mill Street, 5' from Center Line, Westbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 1/2 1 1/2 Class B, poor condition 0.23 0.35 Bit. Binder Course 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 1 Class B, poor condition 0.17 0.17 Granular Base Course 2 1/2 to 11 1/4 8 3/4 Dark Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.53 Subgrade 11 1/4+ Dark Brown Silty CLAY, trace Sand and Gravel, Mc=20% Total 1.04 Core No. C-21 IDOT Struc. Location Orange, 250' W of Heustis Street, 5' from Center Line, Eastbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten, Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 3/8 1 3/8 Class I, poor condition 0.30 0.41 Bit. Binder Course 1 3/8 to 2 5/8 1 1/4 Class I, poor condition 0.25 0.31 Bit. Surface Course 2 5/8 to 4 1 3/8 Class I, poor condition 0.23 0.32 Granular Base Course 4 to 7 3/4 3 3/4 Dark Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.23 Subgrade 7 3/4 to 14 1/2 6 3/4 Grey Silty CLAY with Gravel Total 1 .27 Subgrade 14 1/2+ Dark Brown Silty CLAY, Mc=24% PAVEMENT CORE MEASUREMENTS AND CONDITION YORKVILLE 2002 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS YORK-020405-2 SHA PROJECT NO. 82353 Core No. C-22 IDOT Struc. Location 250' E of Bridge Street/Rte. 47, 5' from Center Line, Westbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 3/4 3/4 Class I, poor condition 0.30 0.23 Bit. Surface Course 3/4 to 1 3/4 1 Class B, poor condition 0.17 0.17 Bit. Binder Course 1 3/4 to 2 3/4 1 Class I, poor condition 0.20 0.20 Granular Base Course 2 3/4 to 12 1/2 9 3/4 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.59 Subgrade 12 1/2+ Black Silty CLAY, trace Sand and Gravel, Mc=20% Total 1.18 Core No. C-23 IDOT Struc. Location Colton, 192' N of West Main Street, 5' from Center Line, Southbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 1/4 1 1/4 Class I, poor condition 0.30 0.38 Bit. Binder Course 1 1/4 to 2 1/2 1 1/4 Class I, poor condition 0.25 0.31 Granular Base Course 2 1/2 to 12 1/2 10 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.60 Subgrade 12 1/2+ Dark Brown Silty CLAY, trace Sand and Gravel, Mc=17% Total 1 .29 Core No. C-24 IDOT Struc. Location Colton, 192' N of Center Street, 4' from Center Line, Northbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 3/4 3/4 Poor condition 0.30 0.23 Bit. Surface Course 3/4 to 1 7/8 1 1/8 Class I, poor condition 0.23 0.26 Bit. Surface Course 1 7/8 to 3 1 1/8 Class I, poor condition 0.23 0.26 Bit. Surface Course 3 to 4 1 Class I, poor condition 0.23 0.23 Bit. Surface Course 4 to 5 1/8 1 1/8 Class I, poor condition 0.23 0.26 Granular Base Course 5 1/8 to 38 32 7/8 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 1 .97 Subgrade 38+ Brown Gravelly SAND, Mc=9% Total 3.20 PAVEMENT CORE MEASUREMENTS AND CONDITION YORKVILLE 2002 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS YORK-020405-2 SHA PROJECT NO. 82353 Core No. C-25 IDOT Struc. Location Colton, 170' N of Spring Street, 4' from Center Line, Southbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 5/8 5/8 Poor condition 0.30 0.19 Bit. Surface Course 5/8 to 1 1/2 7/8 Class I, poor condition 0.23 0.20 Bit. Surface Course 1 1/2 to 2 1/4 3/4 Class B, poor condition 0.17 0.13 Bit. Binder Course 2 1/4 to 3 3/4 1 1/2 Class B, poor condition 0.17 0.26 Granular Base Course 3 3/4 to 6 1/2 2 3/4 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.17 Asphalt Road Mix 6 1/2 to 7 1/4 3/4 Aggregate and asphalt Mix 0.11 0.08 Granular Base Course 7 1/4 to 14 1/4 7 Dark Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.42 Subgrade 14 1/4+ Brown and Grey Silty CLAY, some Sand, trace Gravel, Mc=22% Total 1 .44 Core No. C-26 IDOT Struc. Location Liberty, 200' N of Somonauk street, 4' from Center Line, Northbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 1/2 1 1/2 Class I, poor condition, many air voids 0.30 0.45 Bit. Binder Course 1 1/2 to 2 1/4 3/4 Class I, poor condition, many air voids 0.25 0.19 Bit. Surface Course 2 1/4 to 3 1/4 1 Class B, poor condition 0.25 0.25 Granular Base Course 3 1/4 to 8 1/4 5 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.30 Subgrade 8 1/4+ Dark Brown Silty CLAY, some Sand, trace Gravel, Mc=22% Total 1 .19 Core No. C-27 IDOT Struc. Location Liberty, 170' N of Spring Street, 5' from Center Line, Southbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 1 Class B, poor condition 0.23 0.23 Granular Base Course 1 to 3 1/2 2 1/2 Brown crushed stone 0.10 0.25 Granular Base Course 3 1/2 to 17 13 1/2 Dark Brown SAND and GRAVEL with Brown Silty CLAY 0.06 0.81 Subgrade 1 7+ Brown Silty CLAY, trace Sand and Gravel, Mc=21% Total 1.29 PAVEMENT CORE MEASUREMENTS AND CONDITION YORKVILLE 2002 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS YORK-020405-2 SHA PROJECT NO. 82353 Core No. C-28 IDOT Struc. Location Liberty, 180' N of Center Street, 3' from Center Line, Northbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 3/4 3/4 Class I, poor condition 0.30 0.23 Bit. Surface Course 3/4 to 2 1/4 1 1/2 Class B, poor condition 0.17 0.26 Granular Base Course 2 1/4 to 25 1/2 23 1/4 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 1 .40 Subgrade 25 1/2+ Brown Gravelly SAND, Mc=6% Total 1 .88 Core No. C-29 IDOT Struc. Location Liberty, 192' S of Center Street, 5' from Center Line, Southbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.l Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 1 3/4 1 3/4 Class I, poor condition, many air voids 0.30 0.53 Granular Base Course 1 3/4 to 13 1/2 11 3/4 Crushed Limestone 0.10 1 .18 Granular Base Course 13 1/2 to 21 1/4 7 3/4 Misc. SAND and GRAVEL with Clay 0.06 0.47 Subgrade 21 1/4+ Dark Brown Silty CLAY, some Sand, trace Gravel, Mc=17% Total 2.17 Core No. C-30 IDOT Struc. Location Liberty, 270' E of Colton Street, 5' from Center Line, Westbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 2 1/2 2 1/2 Class I, poor condition, many air voids 0.30 0.75 Bit. Surface Course 2 1/2 to 3 1/2 1 Class B, poor condition 0.17 0.17 Bit. Binder Course 3 1/2 to 4 3/4 1 1/4 Class B, poor condition 0.17 0.21 Granular Base Course 4 3/4 to 1 8 13 1/4 Brown SAND and GRAVEL 0.06 0.80 Subgrade 18+ Dark Brown Silty CLAY, some Sand, trace Gravel, Mc=25% Total 1 .93 Core No. C-31 IDOT Struc. Location Liberty, 196' W of Colton Street, 5' from Center Line, Eastbound Lane Equivalents Material Depth(in.) Thickness(in.) Remarks/Condition Coef. Exten. Bit. Surface Course 0 to 7/8 7/8 Class I, poor condition 0.30 0.26 Bit. Binder Course 7/8 to 2 1/8 1 1/4 Class B, poor condition 0.17 0.21 Granular Base Course 2 1/8 to 36 33 7/8 Brown SAND and GRAVEL with Cobbles 0.06 2.03 Subgrade 36+ Brown Sandy CLAY, trace Gravel, Mc=19% Total 2.51 H x �c rTl HYDRAULIC STREET BLACK TOP 3" (POOR CONDITION) GRAVEL AND STONE B' SILTY CLAY SAND AND GRAVEL VAN EMM ON S TREE T BLACK TCP (FAIR TO POOR CONDITION) 1.5" STONE; SAND, AND CRAM. (POOR TO FAIR CONDITNW) r- (VARIES) ROAD CRA VEL STONE 6'-8" Skil'CLAY Mill SAND AND GRAVEL ADAMS STREET BLACK TOP 25" (POOR CONDITION) GRAVEL AND STONE 1.5"-6"(VARIES) SILTY CLAY SAND AND GRAVEL MADISON S TREE T BLACK TOP (POOR CONDITION) 2.5" STONE; SAND, AND GRAVEL 2" BLACK TOP 2• STONE 4"-12"(VARIES) SILTY CLAY INTH SAND AND GRAVEL MORGAN STREET BLACK TOP 2.5"- (POOR TO FAIR CONDITION) GRAVEL AND STONE 6"-35" (VARIES) SILTY CLAY SAND AND GRAVEL HEUSTIS STREET BLACK TOP 25'-5' (POOR CONDI m I) LIRA LEL AND STOVE 6•-12•(VARIES) SOY CLAY SAND AND GRA MILL STREET BLACK TOP 1.5-5- (POOR CONDITION) CRAWL AND STONE r-zr(VARIES) SILTY CLAY SAND AND O A ND. FOX S TREE T BLACK TOP 2" (POOR CONDITION) CRUSHED LIMESTONE 4.5" SILTY CLAY SAND AND GRAVEL //A SHI N G TON S TRF ET BLACK TOP 2' (POOR CONDI770N) GRAVEL AND STONE 6" SILTY CLAY SAND AND GRAVEL ORANGE STREET BLACK TOP 2.5"-4" (POOR CONDITION) STONE AND GRAVEL 4--9" (VARIES) SILTY CLAY SAND AND GRAVEL CENTER S TREE T BLACK TOP 3" (POOR CONDITION) CRAWL AND STONE 9.75" SILTY CLAY SAND AND GRAVEL COL TON S TREE T SLACK TOP (POOR CONDI770N) STONE AND GRAVEL 5"-33" (VARIES) SILTY CLAY SAND AND GRAVEL , LIBERTY STREET BLACK TOP 1--5" (POOR CONDI770N) STONE AND GRAVEL 5"-34" (VARIES) • SILTY CLAY SAND AND GRAVEL ca x w ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST Project: Yorkville Road Program REVISED 1-31-03 KJB A. Section 1 REVISED 2-13-03 KJB C.Section 2 D. Section 3 A. Section 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS APPROX.QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST HYDRAULIC AVE. I. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER,TYPE A(GUTTER) FT 365.5 $18.00 $ 6,579.00 AGGREGATE SHOULDERS,TYPE B-8" TONS 37.4 $24.00 $ 897.60 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PULVERIZING AND SHAPING SQ YD 649.8 $2.50 $ 1,624.50 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,MIX B,TY2,2.5" TONS 128.4 $35.00 $ 4,494.00 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,MIX D,TY2,1.5" TONS 77.1 $40.00 $ 3,084.00 15"EXCAVATION FOR WIDENING ' YD' 101.5 $18.00 $ 1,827.00 AGGREGATE BASE,TYPE B TONS 168.1 $15.00 $ 2,521.50 BASE REPAIR(ESTIMATE-85%) SQ YD 552.33 $18.00 $ 9,941.94 SANITARY MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS W/CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 1 $800.00 $ 800.00 CULVERT REMOVAL FT 10 - $20.00 $ 200.00 DRIVEWAY CULVERT REPLACEMENT FT 20 $24.00 $ 480.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY'GRINDING SQ YD 56 $12.00 $ 672.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT SQ YD 56 $10.00 $ 560.00 RESTORATION AND SEEDING SQ YD 1,786.90 $5.00 $ 8,934.50 SUBTOTAL $ 42,616.04 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 4,261.60 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 6,392.41 TOTAL 5 53,270.05 RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL FT 365.50 5300.00 $ 109,650.00 II. STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FT 365.50 $50 $ 18,275.00 STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 0.00 $750 $ - TOTAL STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION S 18,275.00 VAN EMMON RD I. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT'S AGGREGATE SHOULDERS,TYPE B-8' TONS 134.1 $24.00 $ 3,218.40 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PULVERIZING AND SHAPING SQ YD 1 1166.2 - $2.50 $ 2,915.50, BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,MIX B.TY2,2.5" TONS 167.6 $35.00 $ 5,866.00 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,MIX D,TY2,1.5" TONS ` 100.5 $40.00 $ 4,020.00 GUARD RAIL REMOVAL FT 500 $15.00 $ 7,500.00 GUARD RAIL TYPE A FT 500 $25.00 $ 12,500.00 TRAFFIC BARRIER TERMINAL SPECIAL ' EACH 3 $1,500.00 $ 4,500.00 BASE REPAIR(ESTIMATE-85%) SQ YD 991.27 $18.00 $ 17,842.86 SANITARY MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS W/CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 2 $800.00 $ 1,600.00 CULVERT REMOVAL FT 10 $20.00 $ 200.00 DRIVEWAY CULVERT REPLACEMENT FT 10 $24.00 $ 240.00 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK,5' ' SQ FT 656 $4.00 $ 2,624.00 SIDEWALK REMOVAL SO FT 656 $1.00 $ 656.00 RESTORATION AND SEEDING SQ YD 3207 $5.00 $ 16,035.00 SUBTOTAL $ 79,717.76 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 7,971.78 ENGINEERING(15%) - $ 11,957.66 TOTAL $ 99,647.20 RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL FT - 656.00 $300.00 S 196,800.00 II. STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FT 656 $50.00 $ 32,800.00 STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 0.00 $750 $ - TOTAL STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION $ 32,800.00 • 020405-EOPC.xls Page 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS APPROX.QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST MADISON ST I. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER,TYPE A(CURB) FT 268.9 $18.00 $ 4,840.20 AGGREGATE SHOULDERS,TYPE B-8" - TONS 160.4 $24.00 $ 3,849.60 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PULVERIZING AND SHAPING SO YD 1784.4 $2.50 $ 4,461.00 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,MIX B,TY2,2.5" ' TONS 322.9 $35.00 $ 11,301.50 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,MIX 0,TY2,1.5" TONS 193.8 $40.00 $ 7,752.00 15"EXCAVATION FOR WIDENING YD' 192.6 $18.00 $ 3,466.80 AGGREGATE BASE,TYPE B TONS 318.8 $15.00 $ 4,782.00 BASE REPAIR(ESTIMATE-65%) SQ YD 1159.86 $18.00 $ 20,877.48 SANITARY MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS W/CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 3 $800.00 $ 2,400.00 CULVERT REMOVAL FT 320 $20.00 $ 6,400.00 DRIVEWAY CULVERT REPLACEMENT FT 320 $24.00 $ 7,680.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY GRINDING SQ YD 890 $12.00 $ 10,680.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT SQ YD 890 $10.00 $ 8,900.00 RESTORATION AND SEEDING SQ YD 2859.2 55.00 $ 14,296.00 SUBTOTAL $ 111,686.58 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 11,168.66 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 16,752.99 TOTAL $ 139,608.23 - RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL FT 919.00 $300.00 $ 275,700.00 II. STORM SEWER REPAIRIRECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FT 919 $50.00 $ 45,950.00 STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 0.00 $750 $ - TOTAL STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION $ 45,950.00 MORGAN ST I. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER,TYPE A(GUTTER) FT 605.6 $18.00 $ 10,900.80 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PULVERIZING AND SHAPING SQ YD 639.2 $2.50 $ 1,598.00 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,MIX B,TY2,2.5" TONS 106.4 535.00 $ 3,724.00 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,MIX D,TY2,1.5" TONS 63.8 $40.00 $ 2,552.00 15"EXCAVATION FOR WIDENING YD' 42.1 $18.00 $ 757.80 AGGREGATE BASE,TYPE B TONS 69.6 $15.00 $ 1,044.00 BASE REPAIR(ESTIMATE-50%) SO YD 319.6 $18.00 $ 5,752.80 SANITARY MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS W/CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 1 $800.00 $ 800.00 CULVERT REMOVAL FT 20 $20.00 $ 400.00 DRIVEWAY CULVERT REPLACEMENT FT 20 $24.00 $ 480.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY GRINDING SQ YD 111 $12.00 $ 1,332.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT SQ YD 111 $10.00 $ 1,110.00 RESTORATION AND SEEDING SO YD 942 $5.00 $ 4,710.00 SUBTOTAL $ 35,161.40 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 3,516.14 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 5,274.21 TOTAL 5 43,951.75 RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL FT 284.90 5300.00 $ 85,470.00 II. STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ` STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FT 284.9 $50.00 $ 14,245.00 STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 17.00 $750 $ 12,750.00 TOTAL STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION 5 26,995.00 020405-EOPC.xls Page 2 r ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS APPROX.QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST ADAM ST I. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER,TYPE A(GUTTER) FT 100 $18.00 $ 1,800.00 AGGREGATE SHOULDERS,TYPE 5-8" TONS 201 $24.00 $ 4,824.00 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PULVERIZING AND SHAPING SQ YD 1583.4 $2.50 $ 3,958.50 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,MIX B,TY2,2.5" TONS 345.5 $35.00 $ 12,092.50 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,MIX D,TY2,1.5" TONS 207.3 $40.00 $ 8,292.00 15"EXCAVATION FOR WIDENING YD' 341.8 $18.00 $ 6,152.40 AGGREGATE BASE,TYPES TONS 565.9 $15.00 $ 8,488.50 BASE REPAIR(ESTIMATE-85%) SQ YD 1345.89 $18.00 $ 24,226.02 SANITARY MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS W/CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 3 $800.00 $ 2,400.00 • CULVERT REMOVAL FT 240 $20.00 $ 4,800.00 DRIVEWAY CULVERT REPLACEMENT FT 240 $24.00 $ 5,760.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY GRINDING SQ YD 666 $12.00 $ 7,992.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT SQ YD 666 $10.00 $ 6,660.00 RESTORATION AND SEEDING SQ YD 4151.8 $5.00 $ 20,759.00 SUBTOTAL $ 118,204.92 • CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 11,820.49 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 17,730.74 TOTAL 5 147,756.15 RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL FT 983.00 5300.00 5 294,900.00 II. STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FT 983 $50.00 $ 49,150.00 STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 9.00 $750 $ 61750.00 TOTAL STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION 5 55,900.00 III. WATERMAIN REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS WATERMAIN REMOVAL FT 481 $20.00 $ 9,620.00 WATERMAIN INSTALLATION 8" FT 481 $40.00 $ 19,240.00 WATERMAIN SERVICE ADJUSTMENT/INSTALLATION EACH 32 $400.00 $ 12,800.00 SUBTOTAL $ 41,660.00 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 4,166.00 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 6,249.00 TOTAL WATERMAIN REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION 5 52,075.00 020405-EOPC.x)s Page 3 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS APPROX.QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST B.Section 2 MILL ST I. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL FT 1220 300.00 $ 366,000.00 II. STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FT 1000 $50.00 $ 50,000.00 • STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 10.00 $750 $ 7,500.00 TOTAL STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION $ 57,500.00 HUESTAS ST I. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER,TYPE A(CURB) FT 1654 $18.00 $ 29,772.00 AGGREGATE SHOULDERS,TYPE B-8" TONS 73.9 $24.00 $ 1,773.60 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GRINDING SQ YD 2905.5 $3.00 $ 8,716.50 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,MIX B,TY2,2.5" TONS 417.7 $35.00 $ 14,619.50 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,MIX D,TY2,1.5" TONS 250.6 $40.00 $ 10,024.00 BASE REPAIR(ESTIMATE-50%) SQ YD 460 $18.00 $ 8,280.00 SANITARY MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS W/CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 4 $800.00 $ 3,200.00 CULVERT REMOVAL FT 360 $20.00 $ 7,200.00 • DRIVEWAY CULVERT REPLACEMENT FT 360 $24.00 $ 8,640.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY GRINDING SQ YD 888 $12.00 $ 10,656.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT SQ YD 888 $10.00 $ 8,880.00 REMOVE CURB FT 300 $4.00 $ 1,200.00 RESTORATION AND SEEDING SQ YD 3697.9 $5.00 $ 18,489.50 SUBTOTAL $ 131,451.10 - CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 13,145.11 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 19,717.67 TOTAL $ 164,313.88 RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL FT 1,188.60 5300.00 S 356,580.00 II. STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FT 1188.6 $50.00 $ 59,430.00 STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 9.00 $750 $ 6,750.00 TOTAL STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION S 66,180.00 III. WATERMAIN REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS WATERMAIN REMOVAL FT 1188.6 $20.00 $ 23,772.00 WATERMAIN INSTALLATION 8" FT 1188.6 $40.00 $ 47,544,00 WATERMAIN SERVICE ADJUSTMENT/INSTALLATION EACH 40 $400.00 $ 16,000.00 SUBTOTAL $ 87,316.00 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 8,731.60 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 13,097.40 TOTAL WATERMAIN REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION S 109,145.00 020405-EOPC.xls Page 4 ITEM DESCRIPTION - UNITS _ APPROX.QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST FOX ST I. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AGGREGATE SHOULDERS,TYPE B-8" TONS 123.3 $24.00 $ 2,959.20 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PULVERIZING AND SHAPING SQ YD 1206 $2.50 $ 3,015.00 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,MIX B,TY2,2.5" TONS 211.9 $35.00 $ 7,416.50 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,MIX D,TY2,1.5" TONS 127.1 $40.00 $ 5,084.00 15"EXCAVATION FOR WIDENING YD' 117.2 $18.00 $ 2,109.60 AGGREGATE BASE,TYPE B TONS 184.9 $15.00 $ 2,773.50 BASE REPAIR(ESTIMATE-75%) SQ YD 904.5 $18.00 $ 16,281.00 SANITARY MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS W/CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 3.0 $800.00 $ 2,400.00 CULVERT REMOVAL FT 240.0 $20.00 $ 4,800.00 DRIVEWAY CULVERT REPLACEMENT FT 240.0 $24.00 $ 5,760.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY GRINDING SQ YD 666.0 $12.00 $ 7,992.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT SQ YD 666.0 $10.00 $ 6,660.00 RESTORATION AND SEEDING SQ YD 2,546.00 $5.00 $ 12,730.00 SUBTOTAL $ 79,980.80 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 7,998.08 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 11,997.12 TOTAL S 99,976.00 RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL FT 603.00 $300.00 S 180,900.00 II. STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FT 603.00 $50.00 $ 30,150.00 STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 3.00 $750 $ 2,250.00 TOTAL STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION S 32,400.00 III. WATERMAIN REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS WATERMAIN REMOVAL FT 603.0 $20.00 $ 12,060.00 WATERMAIN INSTALLATION 8" FT 603.0 $40.00 $ 24,120.00 WATERMAIN SERVICE ADJUSTMENT/INSTALLATION EACH 20 $400.00 $ 8,000.00 SUBTOTAL $ 44,180.00 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 4,418.00 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 6,627.00 TOTAL WATERMAIN REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION S 55,225.00 020405-EOPC.xls Page 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS APPROX.QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST WASHINGTON ST I. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AGGREGATE SHOULDERS,TYPE B-8" TONS 106 $24.00 $ 2,541.60 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PULVERIZING AND SHAPING SQ YD 1036 $2.50 $ 2,590.00 1 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,MIX B,TY2,2.5" TONS 182 $35.00 $ 6,370.00 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,MIX 0,TY2,1.5" TONS 109.2 $40.00 $ 4,368.00 15"EXCAVATION FOR WIDENING YD' 95.9 $18.00 $ 1,726.20 AGGREGATE BASE,TYPE B TONS 158.9 $15.00 $ 2,383.50 BASE REPAIR(ESTIMATE-75%) SQ YD 777 $18.00 $ 13,986.00 SANITARY MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS WI CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 2 $800.00 $ 1,600.00 CULVERT REMOVAL FT 240 $20.00 $ 4,800.00 DRIVEWAY CULVERT REPLACEMENT FT 240 $24.00 $ 5,760.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY GRINDING SQ YD 666 $12.00 $ 7.992.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT SQ YD 666 $10.00 $ .6,660.00 RESTORATION AND SEEDING SQ YD 2187.1 $5.00 $ 10,935.50 SUBTOTAL $ 71,712.80 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 7,171.28 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 10,756.92 TOTAL $ 89,641.00 RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL FT 518.00 5300.00 5 155,400.00 II. STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FT 518 $50.00 $ 25,900.00 STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 3.00 $750 $ 2,250.00 TOTAL STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION 5 28,150.00 III. WATERMAIN REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS WATERMAIN REMOVAL FT 518 $20.00 $ 10,360.00 WATERMAIN INSTALLATION 8" FT 518 $40.00 $ 20,720,00 WATERMAIN SERVICE ADJUSTMENT/INSTALLATION EACH 16 $400.00 $ 6,400.00 SUBTOTAL $ 37,480,00 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 3,748.00 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 5,622,00 TOTAL WATERMAIN REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION 5 46,850.00 • 020405-EOPC.xIs Page 6 p , i k ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS APPROX.QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST ORANGE ST I. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AGGREGATE SHOULDERS,TYPE 8-8" TONS 228.4 $24.00 $ 5,481.60 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PULVERIZING AND SHAPING SQ YD 2482.2 $2.50 $ 6,205.50 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,MIX B,TY2,2.5" TONS 392.2 $35.00 $ 13,727.00 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,MIX D,TY2,1.5" TONS 235.5 $40.00 $ 9,420.00 15"EXCAVATION FOR WIDENING YD' 103.5 $18.00 $ 1,863.00 AGGREGATE BASE,TYPE B TONS 171.3 $15.00 $ 2,569.50 BASE REPAIR(ESTIMATE-60%) SQ YD 1489.32 $18.00 $ 26,807.76 SANITARY MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS W/CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 4 $800.00 $ 3,200.00 CULVERT REMOVAL ' FT 160 $20.00 $ 3,200.00 DRIVEWAY CULVERT REPLACEMENT FT 160 $24.00 $ 3,840.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY GRINDING SQ YD 444 $12.00 $ 5,328.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT SQ YD 444 $10.00 $ 4,440.00 RESTORATION AND SEEDING SQ YD 4716.2 $5.00 $ 23,581.00 $ - SUBTOTAL $ 109,663.36 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 10,966.34 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 16,449.50 TOTAL $ 137,079.20 RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL FT 1,117.00 $300.00 $ 335,100.00 II. STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER REPAIRJRECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FT 1117 550.00 $ 55,850.00 STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 11.00 $750 $ 8,250.00 TOTAL STORM SEWER REPAIRJRECONSTRUCTION S 64,100.00 C.Section 3 COLTON ST I. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AGGREGATE SHOULDERS,TYPE B-8" TONS 226.8 $24.00 $ 5,443.20 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PULVERIZING AND SHAPING SQ YD 2058 $2.50 $ 5,145.00 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,MIX B,TY2,2.5" TONS 389.8 $35.00 $ 13,643.00 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,MIX 0,TY2,1.5" TONS 233.9 $40.00 $ 9,356.00 15"EXCAVATION FOR WIDENING YD' 272.4 $18.00 $ 4,903.20 AGGREGATE BASE,TYPE B TONS 451.1 $15.00 $ 6,766.50 BASE REPAIR(ESTIMATE-60%) SQ YD 1234.8 $18.00 $ 22,226.40 SANITARY MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS W/CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 3 $800.00 $ 2,400.00 CULVERT REMOVAL FT 60 $20.00 $ 1,200.00 DRIVEWAY CULVERT REPLACEMENT FT 60 $24.00 $ 1,440.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY GRINDING SQ YD 166 $12.00 $ 1,992.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT SQ YD 166 $10.00 $ 1,660.00 RESTORATION AND SEEDING SQ YD 5423.3 $5.00 $ 27,116.50 $ - SUBTOTAL $ 103,291.80 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 10,329.18 ENGINEERING(15%) - $ 15,493.77 TOTAL S 129,114.75 RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL FT 1,109.30 $300.00 S 332,790.00 II. STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FT 1109.3 $50.00 $ 55,465.00 STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 12.00 $750 $ 9,000.00 TOTAL STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION - $ 64,465.00 ill 020405-EOPC.xIs Page 7 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS APPROX.QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST LIBERTY ST I. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AGGREGATE SHOULDERS,TYPE 5-8" TONS 231.2 $24.00 $ 5,548.80 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PULVERIZING AND SHAPING SQ YD • 3142.2 $2.50 $ 7,855.50 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,MIX B,TY2,2.5" TONS 533 $35.00 $ 18,655.00 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,MIX 0,TY2,1.5" TONS - 319.8 $40.00 $ 12,792.00 15"EXCAVATION FOR WIDENING YD' 235.7 $18.00 $ 4,242.60 AGGREGATE BASE,TYPE B TONS - 390.1 - $15.00 $ 5,851.50 BASE REPAIR(ESTIMATE-55%) SQ YD 1728.21 - $18.00 -$ 31,107.78 SANITARY MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS W/CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 4 .. $800.00 $ 3,200.00 CULVERT REMOVAL FT 40 $20.00 $ 800.00 DRIVEWAY CULVERT REPLACEMENT FT 40 $24.00 $ 960.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY GRINDING SQ YD 171 $12.00 $ 2,052.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT SQ YD 171 $10.00 $ 1,710.00 REMOVE EXCESS PULVERIZED MATERIAL YD' 145 $5.00 $ 725.00 RESTORATION AND SEEDING SQ YD 6404.2 $5.00 $ 32,021.00 SUBTOTAL $ 127,521.18 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 12,752.12 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 19,128.18 TOTAL -$ 159,401.48 RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL FT 1,516.75 5300.00 5 455,025.00 II. STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FT 1516.75 $50.00 $ 75,837.50 STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 18.00 $750 $ 13,500.00 TOTAL STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION $ 89,337.50 CENTER ST • I. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AGGREGATE SHOULDERS,TYPE B-8" TONS 191.3 $24.00 $ 4,591.20 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GRINDING SQ YD 2080 $3.00 $ 6,240.00' BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,MIX B,TY2,2.5" TONS 299 $35.00 $ 10,465.00 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,MIX D,TY2,1.5" TONS 179.4 $40.00 $ 7,176.00 BASE REPAIR(ESTIMATE-45%) SQ YD 936 $18.00 $ 16,848.00 SANITARY MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS W/CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 2 $800.00 $ 1,600.00 RESTORATION AND SEEDING SQ YD 4784 $5.00 $ 23,920.00 SUBTOTAL $ 70,840.20 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 7,084.02 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 10,626.03 TOTAL 5 88,550.25 RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL FT 936.00 $300.00 5 280,800.00 II. STORM SEWER REPAIRIRECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FT • 936 - $50.00 $ 46,800.00 STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 2.00 $750 $ 1,500.00 TOTAL STORM SEWER REPAIRJRECONSTRUCTION $ 48,300.00 • • 020405-EOPC.xls Page 8 • ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS APPROX.QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST TOTALS I. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER,TYPE A(GUTTER) FT 1071.1 $18.00 $ 19,279.80 COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER,TYPE A(CURB) FT 192;9 $18.00 $ 34,612.20 AGGREGATE SHOULDERS,TYPE B-8" TONS 1,4'N $24.00 $ 35,407.20 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PULVERIZING AND SHAPING SQ YD 15,747 $2.50 $ 39,368.50 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT GRINDING SQ YD 4,986 $3.00 $ 14,956.50 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,MIX B,TY2,2.5" TONS 3496.4 $35.00 $ 122,374.00 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,MIX D,TY2,1.5" TONS 2,098.0 $40.00 $ 83,920.00 15"EXCAVATION FOR WIDENING YD' 1,502.7 $18.00 $ 27,048.60 AGGREGATE BASE,TYPE B TONS 2,478.7 $15.00 $ 37,180.50 GUARDRAIL REMOVAL FT 500.0 $15.00 $ 7,500.00 GUARDRAIL TYPE A FT 500 $25.00 $ 12,500.00' TRAFFIC BARRIER TERMINAL EACH 3 $1,500.00 $ 4,500.00- BASE ,500.00BASE REPAIR(ESTIMATE-%) SQ YD 11.899 $18.00 $ 214,178.04 SANITARY MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS W/CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 32 $800.00 $ 25,600.00 CULVERT REMOVAL FT 1,700 $20.00 J $ 34,000.00 DRIVEWAY CULVERT REPLACEMENT FT 1,710 $24.00 $ 41,040.00 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK,5" SQ FT 656 $4.00 $ 2,624.00 SIDEWALK REMOVAL SQ FT 656 $1.00 $ 656.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY GRINDING SQ YD 4,724 $12.00 $ 56,688.00 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT SQ YD 4,724 $10.00 $ 47,240.00 REMOVE EXCESS PULVERIZED MATERIAL SQ YD 145 $5.00 $ 725.00 COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL FT 300 $4.00 $ 1,200.00 RESTORATION AND SEEDING SQ YD 42,705.60 $5.00 $ 213,528.00 SUBTOTAL $ 1,076,126.34 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 107,612.63 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 161,418.95 TOTAL(EXCLUDES MILL STREET) 5 1,345,157.93 MILL STREET RECONSTRUCTION FT 1,220.00 5300.00 5 366,000.00 RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL(EXCLUDES MILL STREET) FT 10,197.00 5300.00 5 3,059,100.00 II. STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE FT 11,197.05 $50.00 $ 559,852.50 STORM SEWER STRUCTURES EACH 94.00 $750 $ 70,500.00 I SUBTOTAL $ 630,352.50- CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 63,035.25 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 94,552.88 TOTAL STORM SEWER REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION 5 787,940.63 III. WATERMAIN REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS WATERMAIN REMOVAL FT 2,790.6 $20.00 $ 55,812.00 WATERMAIN INSTALLATION 8" FT 2,790.6 $40.00 $ 111,624.00 . WATERMAIN SERVICE ADJUSTMENT/INSTALLATION EACH 108 $400.00 $ 43,200.00 SUBTOTAL $ 210,636.00 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 21,063.60 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 31,595.40 TOTAL WATERMAIN REPAIR/RECONSTRUCTION 5 263,295.00 020405-EOPC.xls Page 9