Loading...
Plan Council Packet 2004 10-28-04 s.0 1United City of Yorkville 0 MI EST �� x___1836 County Seat ofFarm KendRoadall County ..Z 800 Game Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 si : '�0 Telephone: 630-553-4350 1...4..74EL t�v`` Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us PLAN COUNCIL AGENDA Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:30 a.m. CITY CONFERENCE ROOM 8:30 a.m. Staff Meeting 1. Approval/Correction of Minutes: September 23, 2004 2. 9:30 a.m. - PC 2001-06 Grande Reserve Unit 10 - Final Plat 3. 10:30 a.m. - PC 2004-14 Swanson Lane Estates - Preliminary Plan 4. Additional Business • DT1T., United City of Yorkville Plan Council Meeting Sept.24,2004 Members: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Anna Kurtzman, ICCI John Whitehouse, EEI Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Jeff Freeman, EEI Tim Fairfield,BKFD Mike Schoppe, Schoppe Design Sgt. Ron Diedrich, Police Dept. Guests: Pete Huinker, Smith Engineering David Schultz, Smith Engineering Trevor Ryan, Marquette Companies Matt Cudney, Pulte Homes The meeting was called to order at 9:35 AM. The minutes from the August 26th meeting were approved with corrections. Theidel Property—Preliminary Plan Comments from EEI—John Whitehouse 1) Plat of survey item#8 - Smith will be submitting a single legal description that is on the plat of survey and on the preliminary plat to the title company, to update from the five parcel description. 2) Preliminary plat item#20, 21 and 22 -Regarding block lengths, EEI is recommendation of those in excess of the 1320 feet. Where the trial cuts through, EEI is in favor of these for pedestrian access and reasonable cross vehicular traffic. Regarding lots 21-33, another access to Rt. 34 will not be proposed, so the right of way has been provided for a potential road extension. Mr. Whitehouse stated the stubbed roads will be coordinated with Grande Reserve. The Gr. Reserve access to Kennedy Rd.was eliminated. 3) Preliminary plat item#26 - There will be 1900 feet between the centerline of the proposed access for this subdivision and the proposed westerly entrance to Grande Reserve from U.S. Rt. 34. Mr. Huinker said that there will be signals here, per IDOT. 4) Regarding the additional road way on the north side of Kennedy,Mr. Whitehouse stated that they would like to remove the road, because of additional road maintenance with the four driveways. The unincorporated area has two accesses from out lot N, for access to park access. Mr. Fairfield states there is only one temporary way into the north end of the subdivision, and he needs a 2nd access, providing additional for traffic during construction and safety(gas lines)problems. Mr. Whitehouse stated there is an additional field entrance, backing lots 240 and 251 on the nursery property, which he will coordinate with the two developments(jogging onto Gr. Reserve's property) and upgrade with a stone base. 5) Preliminary engineering details requested Mr. Whitehouse have been provided by Smith. 6) Preliminary engineering plan item#40—Mr. Whitehouse stated the City would need temporary hydrants on the end (on the east). The valves would be in the right of way, and Gr. Reserve will remove when their mains are extended. 7) Mr. Whitehouse stated that in a condominium, the City prefers a meter room in each building,with a B-box for each unit. One 6-inch sewer service would be sufficient to each building per Mr. Whitehouse, with a clean-out on one end. In the annexation agreement, if the developer had condominiums,Mr. Whitehouse stated the City should add language that each unit had individual sewer connectors(not fee simple). Mr. Dhuse and engineering would need to make certain there are adequate valves. 1 0 8) Preliminary engineering plan item#42— The developer will extend the 8"water main into the school site(lot 21)will be and an additional water main stub into the commercial area. The number of multi-family units is decreased, because Pulte wanted to reserve additional depth in the commercial area. The water main has been flipped to the north side on the northwest side of the school/park area and the sewer will be on the south side. 9) Preliminary engineering plan item#44—Based on Gr. Reserve(Neighborhood#17)and Autumn Crest,the proposed Rt. 34 water main and easement coordination will be monitored by City engineering and EEI. 10) Traffic Study item#47—Traffic adjacent to the commercial site would bring it close to the ADF classification. The developer has agreed to keep the pavement structure intact. 11) Traffic Study item#49 - The City is preceding with plans across the Kennedy Rd. frontage and the annexation agreement should provide for the$2000/per unit impact fee. The bids would be done over the winter, and front money for construction money should be provided in escrow by the developer for design purposes,prior to the final plat. 12) Storm water item# 52—Mr. Whitehouse stated there is a discrepancy in the commercial area storm management outlet placement, and if it needs to be tied into Hamman's and Fox River. The developer will have no detention on the commercial area. The initial drain will go to the east(out lot A basin) and this basin will not be increased in size. There will be a serpentine swale developed east of Blackberry Creek and Mr. Schoppe will be provided these plans by the developer. 13. Mr. Whitehouse stated that, depending on YBSD, a permanent pump station will be needed north of Kennedy, and a temporary on the Hermann property for the gravity area. 14. In conversation regarding phasing,the City's concern would be the access to Kennedy along Rt.34. The developer stated final platting will be done in April or May. Mike Schoppe's comments 1) Preliminary plat item#4—The street is called Prairie Grass Lane in Prairie Meadows, and Mr. Schoppe stated the cul-de-sac should be named Prairie Grass Court. When Mr. Schoppe and Smith will explore the school/land cash standard when reconfiguration is completed to make certain it is within the City's specifications. 2) Comment#1 -Mr. Schoppe needs a document titled"Preliminary PUD plan and plat", with a separate sheet for preliminary engineering. 3) Comment#2— Per Mr. Cudney the driveways on the east west road configurations will be changed. Mr. Cudney stated this particular unique layout provides amenities for the townhouses, e.g. back-up to the detention area, giving a higher premium on the townhouses. 4) Comment#3 —Inter-city roads connectors for owners in Gr. Reserve,Hamman, and Pulte were discussed. The developer pointed out the additional stub out of the commercial property. Of concern is, in particular,the road across Hamman which is commercial on one side and residential on the other side. The developer will look at the possibility of an additional two feet of right of way(making it 70 foot) and putting in a turn bay. City staff advises the developer to continue the hybrid collector through the Hamman property to Countryside Parkway. 5) Out lot L ownership was discussed. Mr. Cudney suggested the parcel ownership would be discussed at Park board,City Council and Plan Commission. Mr. Schoppe stated there is a detention basin there. Mr. Cudney stated that their in the preliminary plan,the detention area would be a part of the Homeowner's Association and that the flood plain line would not be bisected. 6) Comment# 9 -CDF information will be forwarded by Mr. Schoppe on the wetland delineation. 2 7) Comment# 11 -Architectural plans need to be submitted 10 days prior to Plan Commission. 8) Comment# 12—Per Mr. Schoppe cross access language needed in the annexation agreement and on the preliminary plan and plan, for access to the adjacent commercial on the Hamman property. 9) Comment#13 - The developer will clarify the detail for setbacks. Lot detail now shows a 30' side yard setback. 10) Preliminary Engineering Plan item# 1 —The developer will add notes indicating the school and park sites will be developed to the City's Park Development Standards. Anna Kurtzman's comments 1) Comment 3 —Neighborhood#19 for use as a school site is contingent on the Theidel property(Hinsdale Nursery) on Kennedy also being used as a school campus. Mr. Schoppe stated that he is proceeding with the assumption that there is no school on the Theidel property. The intent is that the school site is being proposed on the Hamman property. 2) Mr. Whitehouse stated the annexation agreement should have language regarding the storm water/wetland ordinance. Ms. Kurtzman will check into the schedule for the new ordinance. 3) Comment#5—Ms. Kurtzman's concern is with the width. Mr. Schoppe stated that some of the buffered area will need to be on the lots. The width of the landscaped area should be 30 wide strips on the urban section. The benning would begin were the lots back up again to the basin. 4) Comment# 7—The developer will make the lots abutting with Gr. Reserve 12,000 feet. 5) Comment# 8—The developer will rerun the calculations. If the maximum coverage is 30%, wording should be included that"the intent of having the open area is there". Mr. Whitehouse suggested a gross summary of lot coverage be provided, making certain lot lines are in accordance with the setbacks needed. 6) Comment# 10—The developer will add the 10 foot to the internal sides. 7) Comment#11 —The developer will submit the information. Tim Fairfield added a comment about lot#s being the same. The multi-family will be started when the street is taken out at the north end, with a note on the plat to designate the single family and multi-family lot numbers. This will be scheduled for Plan Commission on October 13, 2004. Deadline for submittal of 35 preliminary plans will be submitted on October 5th. Needed are new submittals for preliminary engineering, preliminary PUD/plat, and landscaping. Respectfully submitted, Annette Williams 3 1., '1974 - 2004 52 Wheeler Road • Sugar Grove, IL 60554 TEL: 630 / 466-9350 FAX: 630 / 466-9380 Fare ine_crirp Fir•,#��rpz-�s:t:=ss, www.eeiweb.com 30 YEARS OF EXCELLENCE October 21, 2004 Mr. Joseph A. Wywrot, P.E. City Engineer United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Preliminary & Final Plat and Preliminary & Final Engineering Improvement Plans, Grande Reserve, Unit 10, (Neighborhood 7), United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. Dear Mr. Wywrot: We have reviewed the Preliminary/Final Plat and the Preliminary/Final Engineering Improvement Plans for the referenced Unit 10. The Plat has been prepared by Midwest Technical Consultants, Inc. and contains 2 sheets with latest revision date of September 13, 2004. The Engineering Improvement Plans have been prepared by Cowhey Gudmundson Leder, Ltd. and contain 16 sheets with latest revision date of September 21 , 2004. We offer the following comments: In general, the Plat and Improvement Plans are clear and well presented. Our review of these plans is to generally determine the plan's compliance with City of Yorkville ordinances and whether the improvements will conform to existing City systems and equipment. This review and our comments do not relieve the designer from his duties to conform to all required codes, regulations, and acceptable standards of engineering practice. Engineering Enterprises, Inc.'s review is not intended as an in-depth quality assurance review. We cannot and do not assume responsibility for design errors or omissions in the plans. GENERAL COMMENTS It should be noted that this is the first presentation of the proposed land plan for this multi- family neighborhood and thus, in our opinion, should be looked at primarily as a Preliminary Plan with regard to overall layout and internal traffic circulation. An engineer's estimate of probable construction cost should be submitted with the revised plans for use in establishing the required Letter of Credit for Unit 10. G:\Public\Yorkville\2002\Y00215 Grande Reserve(MPI)\doc\Iwywrot29GRUNITI0-01.doc Consulting Engineers Specializing in Civil Engineering and Land Surveying Water main shall be constructed in accordance with Section 41 of the Standard Specifications For Water & Sewer Main Construction In Illinois, in addition to City and any other applicable ordinances. Cover Sheet 1 . The second benchmark listed should be removed from the plans since this utility pole has been removed during the Kennedy/Bristol Road reconstruction project. SHEET 4, Master Utility Plan 2. A valve should be added between Lots 20 and 21 on the 8" main to enable isolation of 9 housing units at one time instead of 18 units. All other proposed valving is adequate. 3. A fire hydrant should be added near the intersection of Litchfield Lane and Matlock Drive. 4. All other fire hydrant spacing meets the City's spacing requirements. However, since this is a relatively dense multi-family area, we recommend that additional fire hydrants be added near the ends of the private access drives for the following lot combinations: 1-2, 5-6, 9-10, 11-12 and 15-16. Since snow will probably be pushed past the end of the pavement turn-a-rounds, these hydrants should be offset about 20 feet from the center of these drives. 5. We recommend that manholes be provided at all changes in direction and at the ends of all sanitary sewer lines serving more than 1 residential unit. We are concerned with the durability, accessibility and the number of cleanouts proposed. Also, profiles should be provided for these sanitary sewer lines. 6. Sanitary structures 7-2 and 7-2C should be relocated to eliminate structure 7-2A. 7. Sanitary structure 7-7C should be eliminated and the sewer line run straight from 7-7D to 7-7. 8. Sanitary structure 7-7A should be eliminated. 9. The storm sewer runs from structure 7-15 to 7-18 should be modified to eliminate the "inlet to inlet" 21 inch storm sewer crossing of Farren Drive. SHEETS 5 & 6, Grading Plan North-South 10. We need to discuss an alternate means of access to the common driveways and the end unit. We believe the "cluster" of 3 access points will be dangerous and confusing. One alternate to discuss is shown on the attached sketch. All other aspects of the grading plan are satisfactory as proposed. G:\Public\Yorkville\2002\YO0215 Grande Reserve(MPI)\doc\Iwywrot29GRUNITI0-01.doc SHEET 7, Plan & Profile 11. The sanitary sewer length and slope from 7-4B to 7-4 need correction. SHEET 8, Plan & Profile 12. The "Exception to Blanket Easement" lines should be revised throughout this Unit as necessary to provide a minimum of 10 feet from the easement line to an underground utility. The Final Plat will require revisions based on this comment. SHEET 9, Plan & Profile 13. There does not appear to be a need for the 1 foot drop in Sanitary MH 7-8. The east invert should be raised and the slope increased. 14. The sanitary sewer length and slope from 7-10B to 7-10 need correction. 15. The sanitary sewer length and slope from 7-8B to 7-8 need correction. SHEET 10, Plan & Profile 16. We recommend keeping fire hydrant 7-24 on the same side of Duryea Drive as the water main to avoid the long hydrant lateral. The lot side of the right of way line should be acceptable. SHEET 11, Street Lighting Plan 17. Though this area is congested with underground utilities, a street light should be added along the curve at approximately Station 33+48, 17'R. All other street light locations, spacing and specifications are in accordance with City standards. SHEETS 12 & 13 Construction Standards & Details 18. Though allowed by a variance granted as part of the Annexation Agreement, we are concerned with the garage face to face dimension of 61 feet as shown in Section A-A. This dimensions yields very little maneuvering room, especially if the garages are not fully utilized and there are a lot of cars parked in front of them. STORM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 19. Drainage Area No. 7 is mislabeled as No. 17. 20. All other data is correctly presented and conforms to the engineering plans. G:\Public\Yorkville\2002\Y00215 Grande Reserve(MPI)\doc\Iwywrot29GRUNITI0-01.doc FINAL PLAT 21. To avoid lengthy metes and bounds legal descriptions for both building permit issuance and fee simple conveyances for the individual units, each parcel containing a multi- family building (EBE 1, etc.) should be platted as a single lot. Following the consecutive lot numbering scheme from Unit 9, these lots should be numbered 836 through 865. 22. Lot 19 is designated to contain a proposed 4 unit building but it appears that the footprint is for a 5 unit building. 23. Non easement areas will need to be revised based on comment #12 above. 24. Farren should be a designated a Street or a Lane, not both. 25. The ultimate owner of Lots 3018 through 3022 inclusive should be noted on the plat. 26. As with other multi-family developments, it is worth noting that if there is a potential that these housing units will be conveyed as condominiums, it would be beneficial to make that decision now as the sewer and water service requirements would be one per building, instead of one per housing unit. 27. That portion of Lot 3022 to be used for stormwater management purposes should be dimensioned and designated as a Stormwater Management Easement. 28. We need to discus the Building to Building separation requirements for this multi-family development (Annexation Exhibit E1) and its application to this proposed layout at the Staff level prior to the Plan Council meeting. If you have any questions or comments regarding this review, or require any additional information, please contact our office. Sincerely, ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. 1\ i 4 ,i( , ! /"- (*" zi(-/C/ ✓ L / 1 John T. Whitehouse, P.E., P.L.S. Senior Project Manager pc: Liz D'Anna, Deputy Clerk Tim Winter, P.E., PDG @ 630-325-5595 Dan Oefner, P.E., CGL @ 630-250-9644 JWF, EEI G:\Public\Yorkville\2002\Y00215 Grande Reserve(MPI)\doc\Iwywrot29GRUNIT10-01.doc H:\sdskproj\Y00215\dwg\Y0021504-ANNEX-EXHIBITS.dwg,Model,10/20/2004 8:21:55 PM,jwhitehouse IN (J1 I— I° z C m --i I:0 I> C) z m 25.00' � I o 0o 0 0 0 0 ` ' I II I �I II I 1 12' 1 30.00' Typical 3ct • 21 • 2004 10 : 54AM No • 6435 P. 2/3 „,, d = � . Schoppe Design Associates Landscape Architecture and Land Planning 126 S, Main St. Ph. (630)551-3355 Oswego, IL 60543 Fax (630) 551-3639 October 21, 2004 MEMORANDUM To: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer From: Mike Schoppe- Schoppe Design Associates, Inc, Re: Grand Reserve—Unit 10 (Neighborhood 7) We have reviewed the Final Plat dated 9/13/04 prepared by Midwest Technical Consultants, Engineering Improvement Plans dated 9/21/04 prepared by Cowhey Gudmundson Leder, Ltd., and the Final Landscape Plans dated September 17, 2004 prepared by Rolf C. Campbell and Associates, and provide the following comments: Final Plat I. The layout of the streets and buildings are consistent with the approved Concept Plan Exhibit"C” of the annexation agreement. • 2. The ownership of lots 3019 and 3022 need to be noted. 3. The location of the front, side and rear of the buildings should be clarified by the Building Department at the Plan Council meeting. The locations of those sides may have an impact on how the design standards in Exhibit El are applied. EngineerinE Improvement Plans 1. At the Plan Council meeting, we should discuss with the staff whether or not we feel there is a need for additional guest parking. 2. The grading plans show certain buildings having a front TF elevation which is 7' to 10' above the street elevation, such as buildings #1, 30, 20 and 22. Given the mass of these buildings, we recommend that the elevations be lowered as much as possible. It appears that several of these buildings could be lowered a couple of feet be redirecting some of the drainage patterns. For example, the drive between buildings 29 and 30 could have the majority of the drive drain towards Grand Trail rather than all going to Litchfield. page I d2 Oct • 21 • 2004 10 . 54AM No . 6435 P . 3/3 • 3. There are walks shown on slopes of 4 or 5 to 1. This walk will create hazards in snow and ice conditions. The slopes need to be reduced or steps incorporated into the plans to eliminate this condition. 4. The sidewalk in front of building 22 cuts diagonally across a 4 to 1 slope, which will create a hazard, Either the elevations need to be reduced, or retaining walls need to be implemented to eliminate this condition. Final Landscape Plans 1. It appears there are differences in the number of plant symbols on the landscape plan vs. the quantities listed in the plant lists. Revise the plan so that the quantity of plant symbols match the quantity listed in the plant lists. 2. Relocate all parkway trees located in the 5' — 6' islands between driveways. There is insufficient space available in these islands to assure adequate growing space and the long term health of the trees. 3. The northeast corner of Neighborhood 7 appears to have two lines dividing the phases. Eliminate the northern cut line so there is a clear boundary between the two separate phases. 4. It does not appear the landscaping around the townhomes is in keeping with the landscape standards that have been embraced for this community. Even though the landscaping is in compliance with the minimum standards required by the City's Landscape Ordinance, we recommend additional landscaping by added so that the facades are more in character with the rest of the community. 5. The landscape plans need to identify the limits and types of the vaxious plant communities around the stormwater basin. If you have any questions, please call. CC: Mayor Art Prochaska Tony Graff, City Administrator Liz D'Anna, Deputy Clerk Tim Winter— MPI John Whitehouse— EEI Bill Dettmer, Building Official peye2of2 PC,' :r")--' 'C' C 1-' C CI United City of Yorkville 06, EST. % 1836 County Seat of Kendall County -:�— 800 Game Farm Road * Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 _ �� Telephone: 630-553-4350 9,�`kLE `\ " Fax: 630 553 7575 Website: www.yorkvllle.il.us October 19, 2004 TO: Tony Graff FROM: Anna B. Kurtzman, AICPZ/C SUBJECT: Compliance Review Final Subdivision Plat - Grande Reserve Unit 10 (Neighborhood 7) I have reviewed the document identified above, along with associated documents, for compliance with the adopted annexation agreement. Based upon this review I note the following: 1. Building#19 has a note indicating that it will be a 4 unit building, however, based upon the size of the building and the annexation agreement, I believe this is suppose to be a 5 unit building. 2. Exhibit El provides separation standards. I do not see separations between buildings listed on the plat. Please have the petitioner provide that information so compliance with Exhibit El can be made. 3. One of the separation standards listed in Exhibit El is to provide a 30 foot perimeter setback. This setback is reflected on all lots, except for the north side of Lot 3022. Please have the petitioner provide this infoimation. 4. Exhibit D5 of the annexation agreement indicates that architectural details will be provided for this unit as part of the PUD approval package. This infoiniation was not provided. /abk filename: C:\Documents and Settings\Anna\My Documents\Grande Reserve\Unit 10\10-19-04GrandeReserve.doc Pc; ace „,_ __ , „,_ r„) .,,. ,. United City of Yorkville EST. 1 _1s3s County Seat of Kendall County -� - 800 Game Farm Road P (VI ` S2Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 9,f„ , a",,-`=0 Telephone: 630-553-4350 <CE XV Website: Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us October 20, 2004 Mr. Kenneth Woods Landmark Consulting, P.C. 25030 Ramm Drive Naperville, Illinois 60564 Re: Swanson Lane Estates Dear Mr. Woods: I have reviewed the proposed final plan for the referenced development, received on October 8, 2004, and have the following comments: General • A plat of subdivision should be submitted for review. • The landscape plan will be reviewed by Mike Schoppe, our land planner. • Please submit plans to Walter E. Deuchler Associates to review on behalf of the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District (YBSD). See comments below about possible city sanitary service instead of septic fields. • If individual septic fields are to be built, permits will be needed from the Kendall County Health Department. • This development will likely disturb more than one acre of land, therefore a Notice of Intent needs to be submitted to the Illinois EPA. Please provide proof of that submittal. • A site development permit is needed from the city. Attached find an application form and pertinent portions of our Erosion Control Ordinance. • Please submit the plans to Bristol-Kendall Fire Protection District to review with respect to hydrant locations and access. • The plans call for a public right-of-way dedication for Boomer Lane. I recommend that Boomer Lane south of the Blackberry Creek North subdivision remain a private road. An ingress/egress easement should be dedicated along that road for vehicles and pedestrians. A public utility and drainage easement should be dedicated over the entire 33-foot width along the west edge of this development. • An engineer's estimate of cost is needed once the final plan is approved. Sheet 1 • A second benchmark is needed. Sheet 2 • The General Notes should also reference the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance, and state that in case of conflict the ordinance shall govern. • Revise the Hydrant Materials note to call for"Safety Red" color. • Revise the Pipe Culvert note to specify RCP. • Revise the Watermain Testing note by calling for a 4-hour pressure test. Also, delete the system pressure leakage test. • Revise the Water Service Connection Materials note to specify Mueller H15154 curb stops and Mueller H10300 B-Boxes. Sheet 3 • List the T/F elevation for the existing home on Lot 4, and also show the location of the existing septic field. • Our floodplain ordinance requires defines the Base Flood Elevation along Blackberry Creek as the 500-yr floodplain as shown in the 1989 Soil Conservation Service Study. The floodplain is shown correctly on the plan. • Due to the low impact of this development, the large number of trees, and the fairly steep terrain, stormwater detention will not be required. Sheet 4 • The existing watermain at the Boomer/Fairhaven intersection is not shown correctly. Please refer to the attachment. The watermain to the west only serves a fire hydrant. You can connect directly to the watermain with a 16"x8" reducer, but you will have to pressure test up against the hydrant leg(constructed in 2003) and the 16" butterfly valve(constructed in 1990). If you are not comfortable with those conditions, call for an 8" gate valve in box at the connection to the existing watermain. • An offsite easement will be needed for the proposed watermain along Boomer Lane. If you cannot obtain that easement, you can cross Boomer just south of Fairhaven. • Revise the watermain alignment near Lot 2 to increase the distance from the existing shed and concrete slab to at least 20 feet. • Show the correct width of the utility easement between Lots 72 and 73. Call for sod restoration and replacement of the sidewalk and property corners that will be removed during construction. • Move Hydrant#3 to the west of the looped cul-de-sac drive to minimize potential from traffic damage. • The invert of the existing sanitary sewer on Fairhaven Drive near Lot 73 is approximately 627.6. It appears that a gravity sewer could be extended south between 306 and 308 Fairhaven to serve at least Lot 3 and possibly Lots 2 and 4 by gravity. Those lots that could not be served by gravity sewer could have individual "grinder" pumps that would pump to a common forcemain and discharge to the gravity sewer. The city would maintain the gravity sewer and common forcemain, but the grinder pumps would be maintained by the individual homeowners. We have a similar set-up on River Birch Drive in the White Oak Estates development. • All culverts should be RCP with precast flared-end-sections and grates. • The existing culvert on Boomer Lane north of the Swanson Lane is in poor condition, and the condition downstream of that point is unknown. Call for the entire culvert to be removed and replaced with a Swale. • Existing Boomer Lane south of Fairhaven Drive is about 19 feet wide. It should be increased to at least 22 feet and given an overlay. • A streetlight should be provided on Boomer Lane at Swanson Lane. • Swanson Lane is proposed to be 16 feet wide. The Police Department and BKFD should review this to determine if it is adequate. Sheet 6 • The existing fence along the west side of Lot 1 is in conflict with the proposed sidewalk and Swanson Lane. Call for this fence to be removed. Sheet 7 • Revise the Bituminous Pavement detail to call for the subgrade fabric to be installed below the aggregate base course. • The existing public sidewalk on Boomer Lane is 4 feet wide. Revise the sidewalk detail to match this width. • Revise the Valve Vault detail to also have"City of Yorkville" cast into the lid. • Revise the hydrant detail to call for a Trench Adaptor valve box or clamps to hold the box plumb with the hydrant barrel. Revise Note 2 to call for"Safety Red" color. • Details may be needed for sanitary sewer items. Use YBSD standard details. • Details may be needed for trench patching depending on possible watermain revisions and sanitary sewer construction. This plan is scheduled for review at our Plan Council meeting on October 28, 2004. Please make the requested revisions and resubmit for review at your earliest convenience. If you have questions about any of these comments, please call me at 553-8545. Very truly yours, Wywrot h w w t P City Engineer Cc: Tony Grafi; City Administrator Liz D'Anna, Deputy City Clerk L 4 cy, \•\ 4 \ X65 L 21" • — �� \ NN. CR ® 0.25% \ 1 \/. \ \ 27" FES —, *111114111111i: ST2 N l �1' \ WK GRATE __ \ \\\ INV=635,30 �' _ ,�h �` - _ I. 74 Ls 18" ' �. . RCP IP 0.46% q- A cas --- in3 ry^) \, / '''--.�.—, --9.�- M ST1 / FES _. r INV • -- INV=634.90 IMMO —8 LF 12" l.' al EXI TING PAVEMEN RCP ® 0.629x/_•• . _ CURB & GUTTER 1 P __ "Gs, EX GATE ='= REMOVED AND REF __� _ 3 VAVLE .i MATCH TCH EXISTING SI 634.80 --- _-.�� I V--------4".--• C� SN1 csT in b' it .-.- _/ Nan _ •..-.-. / y .8 x8 TEE _... SS~"a s IN M G ,co �:`3P. ---- -----_- _�... iv.--___________ _9.1-,E. .. �' 0 .�_ OF _ _ _W� z . �..,,•-.._...__ --- — - LF 8" A „..,...,)r,,5' �'” � � " / HE. ` 56 r` o co REMOVE & REPLACE EX, FRAME ` ° � \ i & GRATE W/ DEPRESSED FRAME e -- - SHE ` ~mss / ! - _ ---_____________I .... --o- & GRATE: RIM-637.63 T DC I w � ,- _.�� HE � ) EX_ AMERITECH MH �� ir EX SAN MH EX MH BENCH TO BE iG ��� ATO BE ADJUSTED RIM=638,14 MODIFIED AS NECESSARY. '''-'7: L: �I INV=630.20 lap EX. CURB & GUTTER I j / (a., r..l TO BE REMOVED & \J REPLACED. SAWCUT _ EX. CURB TO BE REMOVED. A INSTALL EXPANSION JOINTS \�f �r ` -•T >`/ TOD X.00URBTWITH PROPOSED CURB �`t , t �� ! r� Nin �_) l"i' , United City of Yorkville Ordinance No. 0p3.1, 1, SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCE FOR UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE Jl. THIS '/ ` DAY OFf ' fr4 2003. PUBLISHED IN PAMPHLET FORM BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CI OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINaIS THIS ""DAY 0 2003 Page 1 of 15 March 5, 2003 • 400.0 Site Development Permit, 401.0 Permit Required: • Except as otherwise provided in this ordinance, no person shall commence or perform any clearing, grading, stripping, excavating, or filling of land that meets the following provisions without having first obtained a site development permit from the City: 401.1 Any land disturbing activity (i.e., clearing, grading,stripping, excavation,fill, or any combination thereof) that will affect an area in excess of 10,000 square feet; 401.2 Any land disturbing activity that will affect an area in excess of 500 square feet if the activity is within 25 feet-of a lake, pond, stream, or wetland; or 401.3 Excavation, fill, or any combination thereof that will exceed 100 cubic yards. 402.0 Exceptions:. A permit shall not be required for any of the following provided that the person responsible for any such development shall implement necessary soil erosion and sediment control measures to satisfy • the principles set forth in Section 300.0 of this Ordinance: . 402.1 Appurtenant structures on a site in excess of two acres for which a building permit has been issued or excavation below final grade for the basement and footings of a single-family residence; 402.2 Agricultural use of land, including the implementation of conservation measures included in a farm conservation plan approved by the Soil and Water Conservation District, and including the construction of agricultural structures; or • 402.3 Installation, renovation, or replacement of a septic system to serve an existing dwelling or structure.• 403.0 Application for Permit: Application for a site development permit shall be made by the owner of the property or his authorized agent to the (permitting authority) on a form furnished for that purpose. Each application shall bear the name(s) and address (es) of the owner or developer of the site and of any consulting firm retained by the applicant together with the name of the applicant's principal contact at such firm, and shall be accompanied by an application fee of$100.00. Each application shall include certification that any land clearing, construction, or development involving the movement of earth shall be in accordance with the plans approved upon issuance of the permit. 403.1 Submissions: Each application for a site development permit shall be accompanied by the following information: '404.1 A vicinity map in sufficient detail to enable easy location in the field of the site for which the permit-is sought, and including the boundary line and approximate acreage of the site, existing zoning, and a legend and scale. Page 7of15 March 5, 2003 - ORDINANCE 2003-19 SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ORDINANCE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION United City of Yorkville OFFICE USE ONLY • 800 Game Farm Road Date Received: Yorkville, Illinois 60560 ENG Concurrence: Approved By: Date Approved: Permit Number: INDICATE TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT: Subdivision Fill & Grading Pond Dredging Other: ,Being duly sworn upon his oath,in application for a Permit (Applicant) from The United City of Yorkville,Deposes and Says: OWNER'S NAME: ADDRESS: CITY: STALE: ZIP: TELEPHONE: APPLICANT'S NAME: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: TELEPHONE: ENGINEER'S NAME: ADDRESS: CITY: STA1E: ZIP: 1ELEPHONE: CON ITIACTOR'S NAME: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: 1 ELEPHONE: MAINTENANCE PERSON'S NAME: ADDRESS: CITY: STALE: LIP: 1ELEPHONE: SI'1'E DEVELOPMENT PLAN: - 1. Prepare a site development plan in accordance with Section 404.0 (Submissions) and Section 500.0 (Design and Operation Standards and Requirements) of the Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. 2. Attach the legal description of the proposed site on a separate page. 3. COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: A. Starting date: Anticipated completion date: B. Acreage of site: Acreage of project: C. Date of seeding: D. Total area filled or excavated: Cubic yards of fill: E. Max. depth of fill or excavation: Type of fill: F. Presence of: Wetlands Floodplains Woodlands G. Water supply for pond: Surface runoff Ground water H. Additional Information: Signature of Owner Date Ct �� _ =`,QED cry United City of Yorkville Est. - 424"1836 County Seat of Kendall County 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 �<CE `y�?= Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us October 20, 2004 TO: Tony Graff FROM: Anna B. Kurtzmarf-�J//yy 7( SUBJECT: Swanson Lane Estates Review Landscape and Engineering Plans I have reviewed the documents listed above and have the following comments: 1. They have increased the number of lots associated with this subdivision from 5 to either 6 or 8. The Landscape plans show a total of 8 lots (6 buildable lots and 2 outlots) while the engineering plans show 6 lots. Clarification regarding the number of lots will need to be provided. 2. If the outlots will remain, please have the petitioner identify the purpose for these outlots. 3. The petitioner is requesting Estate zoning and has indicated that they want relief from Section 10-6A-4D. This section requires a 50 foot setback from the front property line. They are requesting a 25 foot setback measured from the edge of the cross access easement, which they then state will be roughly 50 feet from Swanson Lane. Staff will need to discuss this concept with the petitioner. Based upon discussions with other developers, the location of the setback may be based, in part, upon the location of utilities within the access easement. 4. Three further comments related to setbacks: a. By definition, the front of a property is that frontage that abuts a public right-of- way. Therefore, the front of lots 1 and 6 will be along Boomer Lane. Given the proposed location of the houses on these two lots, I recommend that the required 50 foot setback from Boomer Lane be reflected on the plat and supporting documents. b. Section 10-6A-4 lists the required setbacks (basically 50 feet from all property lines). Other than relief from the front yard setback the petitioner has not T. Graff Swanson Lane Estates October 20, 2004 Page 2 of 2 requested relief from any other setback. The proposed location of houses on Lots 1, 3 and 6 do not meet the minimum 50 foot setback from all property lines. c. As the definition of setbacks is based upon the location of the front yard (as defined this means from an established right-of-way) and as lots 2 through 5 will not abut a public right-of-way, I would request that all setback lines be drawn on the plat and supporting documents. 5. The petitioner has indicated that they are seeking relief from the standard stoithwater management facilities and that the justification for this is due to the extensive vegetation located on the property. The petitioner also indicated that they would provide additional compensation by adding vegetation to the site. The petitioner is attempting to address this by a note that-is located on the landscape plan. Staff will need to discuss this concept. 6. While the documents indicate the proposed location of houses, no documents have been produced indicating that houses have to be in these locations. If houses can be located anywhere on the property (within the setbacks) then the individual homeowner can elect to place houses where existing trees are located. If trees are deemed to be a valuable asset to this site, then staff will need to discuss how existing trees will be protected. /abk filename: C:\Documents and Settings\Anna\My Documents\Swanson\10-20-04review memo.doc