Loading...
Public Works Packet 2004 11-22-04 .4 D C/ry O United City of Yorkville EST. 1835 County Seat of Kendall County 800 Game Farm Road -� rf w Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 �9s. 4 Telephone: 630-553-4350 �Li<CE t‘�• �2 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Monday, November 22, 2004 7:00 PM City Hall Conference Room Approval/Correction of Minutes: October 25, 2004 Presentations: None New Business: 1. Water Quality Issues for Residents on or Near Bristol Ridge Road Private Wells 2. CEC Recommendations Phase I —ESA Countryside Shopping Center 3. Watershed Planning Implementation Program Donation 4. Water Reports for September and October 2004 5. Well #7 Treatment Facility — Change Order #4 6. Request to Purchase Trucks 7. Well #8 — Change Order #1 8. Hydrogeology and Water Quality Study For a Potential Development of a Safe Secondary Municipal Water Supply from the Shallow Aquifer Within the Northwest Planning Area Old Business: 1. Director of Public Works — Salary Survey 2. Utility Locator Position - PW 10/25/04 3. Game Farm Road / Somonauk Street Update - PW 10/25/04 4. Smith Engineering Agreement for an"As Needed Basis" - PW 8/23/04 5. Six Year Capital Improvement Program — Funding Analysis Update - COW 10/5/04 and PW 9/27/04 Additional Business: UMTD CITY OF E PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING DRAFT Monday,October 25,2004 7:00 P.M. City Hall Conference Room In Attendance: Alderwoman Val Burd Alderman Marty Munns Alderman Sticka Non-Committee in Attendance: Mayor Art Prochaska Public Works Director Eric Dhuse City Engineer Joe Wywrot The meeting was called to order by Alderman Marty Munns at 7:05p.m. ApprovaUCorrection of Minutes: The Committee looked over the two sets of minutes presented for approval this evening. The Committee approved as written the minutes for August 23, 2004. There were two corrections found to be made for the minutes on September 27, 2004. The Committee approved these with the revisions to be made. Presentations: None NEW BUSINESS: 1. Deuchler Agreement for Southwest and Pavillion Road Improvements: Mr. Wywrot opened discussion with the first item informing the Committee on the specifics of what was in front of them. He stated that this is for the design services for the sewer system. He pointed out the specifics with the attachment from Deuchler to show where it will be located. Mayor Art Prochaska pointed out that the drawing shows it flowing through the middle of Pavillion Heights and questioned if there was an easement there to allow this to happen. Mr. Wywrot replied that there could be utility easements when the ordinance was platted, but he told the Committee that they are going to have to obtain for most of the sewers anyways. The Committee discussed why they chose to cut throe h a subdivision and private property. Mr. Wywrot explained that where it is cutting through is the natural low section through the development,but they could probably follow the right of way with talking to Kendall Township. The Committee moved to send this on to 11/2/04 COW on Consent Agenda. They also agreed to make sure it is known that this project is subject to the City acquiring the dollars from the developers before Deuchler proceeds forward with it. 2. Utility Locator Position: Alderman Munns moved the meeting on to the next item. Mr. Wywrot stated to the Committee that the individual, Mike Robinson, 1 who is currently doing the J.U.L.I.E. locates is working beyond the part-time position it was supposed to consume in his day. Mr. Wywrot and the Public Works Department feel that a full-time position needs to be filled to handle the workload they are handling now. They feel that someone new can come in with proper experience and knowledge to do this work and they can then pull Mr. Robinson into the Engineering Department on a full-time basis. The Committee discussed that the Department is sent tickets on what areas that they need to locate their Utilities and the workload varies day to day with no compensation from anyone. The position rate would be at a middle of the low end of the pay scale. Mr. Dhuse explained that it would take skill to run the infrastructure locator and the street light locator,being that you need to hook up to live power. They will be putting together a job description for the actual position and will bring back to the Committee to look over next month. 3. Snow Removal Policy: Mr. Dhuse started the discussion explaining to the Committee that it has been inquired by the business owners in the downtown area on Route 47 if snow removal would be provided by the City to clear off the sidewalks. He went on to state that the City has previously done that,but there is no policy stating if this is a service the City provides. The Committee discussed different issues and liability this would bring up. The Committee agreed that they will clear the snow that builds up at the edge of the roadway and the sidewalk only, but will not go down the sidewalks themselves. Mayor Prochaska asked that Mr. Dhuse would explain to the business owners they will do all they can to keep the parking spots and up to the sidewalk by the curb as clear as possible during the snow storms. The Committee unanimously agreed that the public parking provided should be cleaned by the City as best they can. They asked that a policy be made that states that the City will be responsible for the snow removal from the curb out. 4. Smell Street Forcemain& Sanitary Sewers—Final Payment: Mr. Wywrot started explaining the situation the City is being asked to resolve regarding the money that was lost by H. Linden& Sons Sewer& Water,Inc. when they received a contract by the City for this project and then the project was only done half way. They are now asking for compensation in the amount of$51,609.00 from not constructing the whole project. He also explained to the Committee the way most companies bill and now with only half of the awarded project being done,the company that did the rest of the work will be losing money on the entire job. Mr. Wywrot walked the Committee through the spreadsheet provided showing the specifics of where they lost money,which is shown below: • Additional cost of Trench Back Fill $43,434.00 • Cost of Special TEES $ 4,784.00 • Restocking charge on pipe $ 766.00 • Restocking charge on manhole $ 2,625.00 • TOTAL REQUEST $51,609.00 The Committee discussed the specifics of each individual compensation request. The Committee agreed that they wanted to be fair to the company for the contract 2 they were awarded, but at the same time do not want to hand over more money than is found to be a fair amount. As far as the restocking charges the Committee all agreed that those fees were fair. As far as the cost of the Special Tees the Committee agreed that if they are being asked to pay for the entire cost of the product,they should be owned by the City. When it came to the Additional cost of the Trench Back Fill,the Committee asked Mr.Wywrot to come up with the fair amount the City should be asked to pay for compensation in this area. The Committee agreed it would not be fair to pay for the Companies entire profit that was expected when doing the entire job, when only half the job was needed to be done. Mr. Wywrot will speak to Mr. Kramer after coming up with the figures he feels are fair and this will go to COW on 11/16 for discussion on all the different figures this Committee feels is appropriate to pay. The Committee agreed that it would be fair to get this paid as fast as possible with the Bond money there and ready. The Committee also discussed the idea of starting a policy should be put in place stating that a project can not be started until all the easements are obtained. 5. Game Farm Road/Somonauk Street—Update: Mr. Wywrot rolled out the proposed plans provided by Smith Engineering to explain to the Committee what they are proposing to do along this route. He stated that Smith Engineering is expecting IDOT will want a wider sidewalk on one side of the street due to the schools and parks in the area. Mr. Wywrot stated that Smith Engineering is proposing on the plans to place a l Oft wide sidewalk on the north side of Somonauk and the east side of Game Farm Road. The other questions that goes along with this is if the City wanted concrete or asphalt, and would they like to pursue reducing the width down to 8 feet wide. The Committee discussed this issue in depth and came to the agreement that the City should request that they put in a 5ft wide walk on both sides and make one a bike path and one a sidewalk and make it apearant and clearly marked which is which. The conclusion being that the Committee would like a wider sidewalk as a bike path on the north side of Somonauk which would transition into a 5ft sidewalk beyond West Street and have 5 ft sidewalk along the South and then West side of Somonauk and Game Farm Road. Mr. Wywrot will take this back to have Smith Engineering to propose to IDOT. Mr. Wywrot stated that Smith Engineering is asking if the City would like to combine Tower Lane with the school driveway. The Committee discussed this idea and agreed that those two roads are better left as is. It has also been asked if the City would like to continue the side walks on the West side of Game Farm Road from Route 47 to the North side of the High School which will result in more rights of way to be purchased. The Committee found this was not a necessity to find it feasible to do. 3 Another topic they discussed is bringing the intersection of Somonauk Road with Game Farm Road to form a right angle intersection. It was felt by the Committee that this would result in the City having to purchase the home-owner's property that is currently living there for that right of way to happen. Mr. Wywrot stressed the point that this right angle necessary would be necessary for the project to happen. The Committee also discussed the topic of Smith Engineering calling for a 3-lane roadway(one lane in each direction with a center bi-directional turn lane for the full Iength of the project), which they are also calling for a separate southbound right-turn lane for the high school entrance. Mr.Wywrot stated he has already spoken with at least 2 residents along Game Farm that didn't want to have a 3- lane road in front of their homes. He asked if the Committee would like to consider having just a 2-lane roadway from the north end of Beecher Park to Route 34 with still having a 3-lane road approaching Route 34 to have a separate left-hand turn bay. The Committee discussed this issue and felt that if the High School on the West side of the Road would change the traffic flow direction to the opposite as it is now,that would help with the traffic flow on Game Farm now and that area should have 3 lanes. As far as the rest of Game Farm Road and Somonauk Road they will see what the right of way situation concludes with as far as width. The Committee discussed this further and found that having 3 lanes for the entire stretch of roadway that is being considered is not going to increase traffic, but just help the flow of traffic. So they concluded to try and keep it at 3- lanes for the entire length except where there will be 4-lanes with the right turn lane at the west side of the High School entrance. Mr. Wywrot will take this back to Smith Engineering with the suggestions that the Committee has decided on as well as clarifying the situation regarding the homeowner on the corner of Somonauk and Game Farm Roads with the right angle intersection. He knows that they are following IDOT standards in the respect that you do not start right of way acquisition until Phase I is complete. The Committee also thought it would be a good idea to send a letter out to the home-owners in the area to inform them that the right of ways will be looking to be acquired in the near future. They also felt the need to speak to Mr.Kramer;the City Attorney to check into the legal rights the City has in determining the legal right of way. This item will move onto the next Public Works Committee Meeting in November for an update for where it stands. 6. River's Edge Unit 1 —Letter of Credit Reduction#3: Mr. Wywrot stated that this is a standard credit reduction request for River's Edge Unit 1. Mr. Wywrot supports this reduction to go forward and has found some errors in the numbers from the Developers spreadsheets, so he prepared a new spreadsheet to show the proper amount. The correct amount of the reduction should be$243,213.88 4 leaving the remainder of the letter of credit at$790,190.17. The Committee agreed to send this on to COW on 11/2/04 as Consent Agenda. 7. River's Edge—Final Acceptance: Mr. Wywrot stated they are making good progress in their work but are not ready for final acceptance at this point due to not having some of the punch list work to do. Once that is done this item will go onto a future COW. 8. Grande Reserve Mass Grading—Letter of Credit Reduction#1: Mr. Wywrot explained that in this situation they had established a Mass Grading letter of Credit,which had expired. Since it expired before they could get the reduction in they were hoping for,they renewed the letter of credit and now are looking for the reduction. Mr. Wywrot concurs with this and is supportive of the reduction of $2,380,731.35, leaving the remaining letter of credit at$668,679.58. This will move onto COW on 11/2 as Consent Agenda. OLD BUSINESS: 1. Director of Public Works: Mr. Dhuse stated to the Committee he is not finished getting all the information together for this item and will bring back to the November Public Works Meeting if he can get the#'s to work out right. 2. North Water Tower—Change Order#3: Mr. Wywrot stated to the Committee this change order came about due to a delay in the project. They had an almost year delay due to the water main not being constructed into the North Water Tower. The increase is $10,770.00 for material costs which Mr. Wywrot is concurring as a legitimate cost. Mr. Wywrot stated this delay was due to easements not being acquired in time again. The Committee agreed to the cost and this will go to COW on 11/2/04 as Consent Agenda. 3. Smith Engineering Agreement for an "As needed Basis"—PW 8/23/04: Mr. Wywrot started by saying there was no paperwork from Smith Engineering, but he had spoke to Jim Hoving and he confirmed that this was to formalize the relationship in having an agreement on hand if someone from the City of Yorkville with authority were to call them with work. This will establish with the City agreed prices ahead of time. Mr. Wywrot will bring this back to Public Works Committee with more information. 4. Grande Reserve - Landscape Irrigation—PW 9127/04: The Committee decided that there was no new information since Grande Reserve never responded, so they will remove this from the agenda. 5. Deuchler Agreement for FPA Amendment to YBSD Southwest Service Area—PW 9/27/04: Mr. Wywrot told the Committee that if both the changes that were previously requested by the Committee that this could move to COW 5 on 11/2/04 as Consent Agenda along with#1 on New Business. The Committee agreed both of these should move forward co currently. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: 1. Mayor Prochaska stated to the Committee that he had Eric look at the Downtown area as far as having someone down there once a month for cleanup. 2. Mayor Prochaska told the Committee that the East alley-way has a railing that looks like it has taken some hits by vehicles due to the way the traffic flow is allowed to go. He suggested that the vehicles be limited to cars only to prevent further damage to the railing and maybe putting in a stairway and railway for pedestrians. He asked that pricing be put together for the Committee to look at. 3. Mayor Prochaska also brought up the West alley-way in the respect of finding out if the parking lot there is actually owned by the City to have it paved. The meeting was ended at 8:40pm. Minutes by: Sheila Teausaw 6 Page 1 of 1 Annette Williams From: Brian Mihelich [bmihelich@cecinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 10:05 AM To: tgraff@yorkville.il.us; awilliams@yorkville.il.us Cc: mmonteith@cecinc.com Subject: Countryside Shopping Center Tony, Per our conversation last night, I'm attaching a copy of CEC's recommendations for addressing environmental issues related to the shopping center. If necessary, CEC can prepare a cost estimate to address these issues for the City. Also, I just got off the phone with Mark Book's regarding the MBRG project. He indicated that it would not be a problem, but I did need to reduce the grant amount accordingly. As was his stance when we first approached this, he is adamant about the City benefiting more than FS. Mark asked me to prepare a short letter outlining what the City would like to do with the project site. I'll get that letter out to you later today with the attachments. Lastly, I'll wait for the heads up from you to have Geneva Capital to contact Kevin at Speers. Thanks and let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Brian S. Mihelich, CHMM Project Manager Civil &Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3041 Woodcreek Drive Suite 210 Downers Grove, IL 60515-5417 Phone: 630.963.6026 ext. 18 Fax: 630.963.6027 Email: bmihelich(cecinc.com Website: http://www.cecinc.com 10/6/2004 I)vi May 7, 2004 Mr. Tony Graff City Administrator United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Subject: Recommendations Phase I ESA- Countryside Center Mall 514 Countryside Yorkville, Illinois Dear Mr. Graff: Civil&Environmental Consultants,Inc. (CEC)has reviewed the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the Countryside Center Mall,dated June 28,2002 and prepared by Levine Fricke Recon(LFR). The following summarizes the next steps to take prior to any remediation/demolishing or property transactions. 1. The Phase I ESA report was completed in 2002. CEC recommends the completion of an updated Phase I ESA as per the requirements outlined in ASTM 1527. The updated Phase I ESA should include securing a Historical Shopping Center Occupant Report,if available for the Site. The Historical Shopping Center Occupant Report should assist in developing a history of tenants operating in the shopping center and evaluate the potential for additional historical impacts at the Site. Any additional due diligence documentation including Freedom of Information Act Responses from the Illinois State Fire Marshals Office, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's Bureau of Air, and Land, and from the Illinois Emergency Management Agency should be completed. In addition,confirmation of building permit records from the City, and Assessment records from Kendall County should be obtained and reviewed. Freedom of Information Act requests should be completed on the two adjoining service stations located at the northwest and northeast corners of Route 47 and Route 34. Should the results of the updated Phase I ESA suggest the potential for onsite or offsite Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), a Phase II Subsurface Investigation will be recommended to assess these RECs. If subsurface impacts are encountered, an additional investigation will be recommended to delineate the extent of impact,and enroll the property into the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's (IEPA) Site Remediation Program (SRP) for the purposes of obtaining a No Further Remediation (NFR) letter. Mr. Tony Graff May 7, 2004 Page 2 2. The Phase I ESA indicated the presence of a "plant on premises" dry cleaner. An investigation should be completed on the Countryside Cleaners. The investigation should first include the eligibility of the drycleaner to enroll into the Drycleaner Environmental Response Trust Fund. The trust allows owners of eligible drycleaning facilities to seek reimbursement of investigative and remediation costs of drycleaner solvent related impacts. Funding includes the completion of a Phase I ESA. There are deductibles associated with investigative and remediation related activities. Whether or not the dry cleaner is eligible for reimbursement through the trust fund,a Phase II subsurface investigation is recommended to characterize the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions. Should impacts be encountered,an additional investigation should be completed in order to develop a plan for remediating the area and enter the property into the IEPA's SRP for the purposes of obtaining an NFR letter. 3. The Phase I ESA generally described the materials observed inside of the four buildings. The report referenced the presence of potential asbestos containing materials (pipe wrap)in the Countryside Cleaners. The report did not describe the sampling of any building materials. An investigation is recommended to assess building materials for potential concentrations of asbestos and lead. If asbestos and lead are encountered, a work plan can be prepared to manage or remove the materials as required prior to demolition. CEC appreciates the opportunity to review the documentation referenced,and provide environmental recommendations to you. If you have any questions or need additional information,please contact Brian Mihelich or myself at (630) 963-6026. Sincerely, Civil&Environmental Consultants, Inc. Michael D. Monteith, P.G. Brian S. Mihelich, CHMM Senior Project Manager Project Manager 1 THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION We save land. We save rivers. •THE• CONSERVATION FOUNDATION Established 1972 Founding Chairman Mayor Art Prochaska Brooks McCormick 800 Game Farm Rd. Trustees Yorkville, IL. 60560 James D'Ambrosio Chairman October 21, 2004 Dalip Bammi Vice Chairman Dear Mayor Prochaska: Robert Hutchinson Treasurer I am following up on my letter of August 1, 2004 asking for your support for the next year Betty Bradshaw of the Watershed Planning Implementation Program. As you know, the watershed plan secretary Implementation Councils are made up of local stakeholders such as yourself who promote Christopher B.Burke,Ph.D. James M.Huck,Jr. the recommendations in the watershed plans. Ruth Kretschmer Douglas B.Mains,M.D. Our recent work in Kendall County has expanded into the Aux Sable watershed to address Ron Nosek Kaaren Oldfield Joliet's western expansion into the county. Because of input from the local communities, Mary Ochsenschlager Joliet continues to revise its comprehensive plan for the area to include more principles of Jack Riley conservation design. The result of this should be a higher quality of life for new Bruce A.Schurman Christine Sobek,Ed.D. developments and for existing residents and neighbors. We have also been inventorying Stephen C.VanArsdell Blackberry Creek in Yorkville and working with residents in Countryside to promote and Leadership Board facilitate protection of the creek via a protected greenway for the creek corridor. In James Bramsen President/CEO S, addition,we continue to work with homeowners and their children to promote awareness Spraying Systems Company of the importance of watershed protection.These initiatives provide to municipalities,and Karen A.Callanan ''' specifically to Yorkville, a helping hand as they design their future communities. Will Country Treasurer Dr.William Carroll Funding for these projects is renewed on an annual basis and it is conditioned on President contributions from watershed communities. Therefore,we ask all the municipalities in the Benedictine University Sunil Chand,Ph.D. watershed to support the program fmancially by contributing three thousand dollars President annually. Yorkville has made this contribution in the past, and we hope it will do so again College of DuPage this year. Frank M.Clark , President I acknowle•= and tha , ou for your continuing support of our efforts, Commonwealth Edison Kay Hatcher Kendall County Forest Preserve District Mike McCoy Ksenia Rudensiuk,MS, JD ` Kane County Board Chairman Director of Watershed Planning/Legal Counsel : , Cl - D.Dewey Pierotti,Jr. i/P/f .-}L. DuPage County e kJ J Forest Preserve President Robert J.Schillerstrom DuPage County /17L1 -2 Board Chairman Cc: Tony Graff, City Administrator Thomas Schneider Vice President Molex,Inc. {3__1_�i President/CEO w � /7 Brook McDonald ww.theconservationfot / 0/ 2 10 S 404 Knoch Knolls Road, Naperville, Illinois ( 111 ilk. .. 1 ti CITY OF YORKVILLE _gat 1„,_ Iiiii nillpi WATER DEPARTMENT REPORT la-` .-- MONTH SEPTEMBER 2004 WELLS WELL DEPTH PUMP DEPTH WATER ABOVE THIS MONTH'S PUMPAGE NO. (FEET) (FEET) PUMP (FEET) (MILLION GALLONS) 3 1335 463 205 17,693 4 1393 447 180 18,545 TOTAL 36,238 CURRENT MONTH'S PUMPAGE IS 3,429,000 GALLONS MOR£ THAN LAST MONTH ❑ LESS il MORE 6,962,000 GALLONS THAN THIS MONTH LAST YEAR 0 LESS DAILY AVERAGE PUMPED: 1,208,000 GALLONS DAILY MAXIMUM PUMPED: 1,531,000 GALLONS DAILY AVERAGE PER CAPITA USE: 125.8 GALLONS WATER TREATMENT CHLORINE FED: 431 LBS. CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 1.4 MG/L FLUORIDE FED: 541 LBS. CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 0.33 MG/L WATER QUALITY AS DETERMINED FROM SAMPLES ANALYZED BY ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY BACTERIOLOGICAL: 9 SAMPLES TAKEN 9 SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY (EXPLAIN FLUORIDE : 2 SAMPLE(S) TAKEN CONCENTRATION: 1.03 MG/L MAINTENANCE NUMBER OF METERS REPLACED: 5 NUMBER OF LEAKS OR BREAKS REPAIRED : 0 NEW CUSTOMERS RESIDENTIAL 56 COMMERCIAL 1 INDUSTRIAL/GOVERNMENTAL 1 COMMENTS JOE MOORE FINISHED SUMMER PROJECT WITH ISMA PRAIRIE GARDEN INDUSTRIAL PK ON LINE IA CITY OF YORKV I LLE coll; Ilk. `,. WATER DEPARTMENT REPORT ` lk_ MONTH OCTOBER 2004 WELLS , WELL DEPTH PUMP DEPTH WATER ABOVE THIS MONTH'S PUMPAGE NO. (FEET) (FEET) PUMP (FEET) (MILLION GALLONS) 3 1335 463 200 16,513 4 1393 447 170 18,112 TOTAL 34,146 CURRENT MONTH'S PUMPAGE IS '.2,092,000 GALLONS E MORE THAN LAST MONTH ® LESS El MORE 3,274,000 GALLONS THAN THIS MONTH LAST YEAR D LESS DAILY AVERAGE PUMPED: 1,101,000 GALLONS DAILY MAXIMUM PUMPED: 1,648,000 GALLONS DAILY AVERAGE PER CAPITA USE: 114.6 GALLONS WATER TREATMENT CHLORINE FED: 482 LBS. CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 1.7 MG/L FLUORIDE FED: 586. 5 LBS. CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 0.36 MG/L WATER QUALITY AS DETERMINED FROM SAMPLES ANALYZED BY ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY BACTERIOLOGICAL: 9 SAMPLES TAKEN 9 SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY (EXPLAIN FLUORIDE : 2 SAMPLE(S) TAKEN CONCENTRATION : 1.03 MG/L MAINTENANCE NUMBER OF METERS REPLACED : 9 NUMBER OF LEAKS OR BREAKS REPAIRED : 0 NEW CUSTOMERS RESIDENTIAL 46 COMMERCIAL 1' INDUSTRIAL/GOVERNMENTAL COMMENTS FLUSHED HYDRANTS IN TOWN. WELL #9 PASSED ALL SAMPLES AND ON LINE.RAW WATER MAIN FROM WELL #9 TO WATER TREATMENT PLANT PASSED ALL SAMPLES AND ON LINE WATER TREATMENT nvFR PLANT SAMPLES ALL PASSED AND FILTERS ARE ONLINE, ALL WATERMAINS AND WATER TOWER PASS ALL SAMPLES AND ALSO ON LINE, CORNERSTONE SUBDIVISION WATERMAIN ARE ON LINE, 161,000 GALLONS OF WATER WAS USED FOR COUNTRY HILL PARK BY PARKS DEPARTMENT. .I>�, r �' UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE To: Tony Graff, City Administra r From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Subject: Well#7 Treatment Facility—C ange Order#4 Date: October 29, 2004 Attached find one copy of proposed Change Order#4 for the referenced project. This change order, in the amount of a$9,368.50 increase, is for changes to the building and well controls. The change order also adds 7 calendar days to the contract to complete the building changes. The treatment building was bid with an exterior comprised of brick and"Hardy Plank" siding. Upon further review, direction was given by the City Council to have an all-brick exterior. The proposed cost of$8000 is very similar to the change order approved for the Well 8 & 9 treatment building. The change to the well controls in the amount of$1368.50 is intended to reduce problems with water hammer. Water hammer is a pressure wave that can be created within the watermains whenever a valve is suddenly closed. Excessive water hammer can result in watermain breaks and also stir up rust. I recommend that this •_. ge order be approve . Please place this item on the Public Works Committee agenda • Novem. - 2, 2004 fo •nsideration. (/// Cc: Liz D'Anna, Deputy City Clerk CHANGE ORDER Order No.: 4 Date: October 5, 2004 Agreement Date: December 26, 2003 NAME OF PROJECT: Well No. 7 Well House and Treatment Facility OWNER: United City of Yorkville CONTRACTOR: Poulos Construction Company The following changes are hereby made to the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: 1) Furnish and install masonry exterior in lieu of fiber cement board siding at all building elevations as per architectural drawing revisions dated 1/04 (Add: $8,000.00). 2) Provide an additional 7 days to the contract time to allow for the masonry change. 3) Furnish and install control relays,sockets,terminal blocks,wiring, programming,etc. to open the deep well pump control valve upon Well No. 7 pump shutoff required (Add: $1,368.50). Justification: 1) The City has selected masonry in lieu of fiber cement board. 2) The increase of 7 days to the Contract Completion Date is to allow for time lost due to the masonry revision. 3) The deep well pump control valve revisions are necessary to help prevent excessive water hammer upon Well No. 7 shut down. Change of CONTRACT PRICE: Original CONTRACT PRICE: $ 1,655,000.00 Current CONTRACT PRICE adjusted by previous CHANGE ORDER(S) $ 1,678,212.23 The CONTRACT PRICE due to this CHANGE ORDER will be (increased) (dec ) by: $ 9,368.50 The new CONTRACT PRICE including this CHANGE ORDER will be $ 1,687,580.73 CO-04 CHANGE ORDER Page 2 Change to CONTRACT TIME: The CONTRACT TIME will be (increased) (decreased) by 7 calendar days. The date for completion of all work will be December 17, 2004. Approvals Required: To be effective this order must be approved by the agency if it changes the scope or objective of the PROJECT, or as may otherwise be required by the SUPPLEMENTAL GENERAL CONDITIONS. Requested by: .% O Poulos Construction Corn.an Recommended by: —Engineerinq Enterprises, Inc. Accepted by: United City of Yorkville CO-04 POULOS INC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CHANGE ORDER REQUEST Project: Well No. 7 Well House and Treatment Facility COR#: 13 To: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. Date: 08/31/04 Attn: Timothy Farrell, P.E. Poulos Inc. Construction Company is directed to proceed with the following work which represents a change or changes in the work as described by the contract documents: DESCRIPTION: Provide masonry exterior in lieu of siding at all building elevations as per EEI architectual modifications drawings dated 01/04. Provide material from brick manufacturer as directed by EEI 01/20/04. [1375 sf=4095 brick @ $505/1000 less than originally specified.] The performance of the work described requires a cost adjustment to the contract as follows: Subcontractor Cost OH & P Total Cost Poulos, Inc. $ 8,000.00 0.00% $ 8,000.00 The time estimated to be required for the work to be accomplished upon acceptance: NOTE: Field work will be affected. Yes No Time extension is required to perform work. Yes X No These revisions affect certain long lead items. Yes No Project schedule critical path delay [days]: FOR POULOS INC. CONSTRUCTION CO. BY: Poulos Inc Construction Company is hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the work as described above at the cost indicated. The time required for perfoinnance of the contract for construction will be extended by 7 days ACCEPTED BY: DATE: Project Architect ACCEPTED BY: DATE: Owner Representative POULOS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 735 South Laramie Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60644-5224 Phone: (773) 626-8600 Fax: (773) 626-8646 E-mail:admin@poulosconstruction.com Web:www.pouloscoRstruction.com POULOS INC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CHANGE ORDER REQUEST Project: Well No. 7 Well House and Treatment Facility COR#: 16 To: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. Date: 09/29/04 Attn: Timothy Farrell, P.E. Poulos Inc. Construction Company is directed to proceed with the following work which represents a change or changes in the work as described by the contract documents: DESCRIPTION: Revise influent check value to prevent excessive water hammer in the system as per the attached. The performance of the work described requires a cost adjustment to the contract as follows: Subcontractor Cost OH & P Total Cost US Filter $ 1,190.00 15.00% $ 1,368.50 The time estimated to be required for the work to be accomplished upon acceptance: NOTE: Field work will be affected. Yes No Time extension is required to perform work. Yes No These revisions affect certain long lead items. Yes No Project schedule critical path delay [days]: FOR POULOS INC. CONSTRUCTION CO. BY: Poulos Inc Construction Company is hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the work as described above at the cost indicated. The time required for performance of the contract for construction will be extended by days ACCEPTED BY: DATE: Project Architect ACCEPTED BY: DATE: Owner Representative POULOS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 735 South Laramie Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60644-5224 Phone: (773) 626-8600 Fax: (773) 626-8646 E-mail:admin@poulosconstruction.com Web:www.pouloscoixstruction.com Page 1 of 1 Tim Curtin From: Hoislin, Dale <HolslinD@USFilter.com> To: <tcurtin@poulosconstruction.com> Cc: <JGreaney@Gasvoda.com>; Erickson, Robert <EricksonR@USFilter.com>; Forsman, Kevin <ForsmanK@USFilter.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 3:14 PM Attach: Yorkville Well 7 Brine Change Order 1.doc Subject: Yorkville, IL Well 7 Tim, Attached is the quote per EEI's request regarding the Brine Pump and Vent Valve. Please contact me with any questions. <<Yorkville Well 7 Brine Change Order 1.doc>> Regards, Dale Hoislin Application Engineer USFilter Control Systems 1239 Willow Lake Blvd. Vadnais Heights, MN 55110 Office: 651-766-2700, Ext. 3117 Fax: 651-766-2701 e-mail: holslind(q USFilter.com www.usfilter.com Confidentiality Note: This e-mail message and any attachments to it are intended only for the named recipients and may contain confidential information. If you are not one of the intended recipients, please do not duplicate or forward this e-mail message and immediately delete it from your computer. Control Systems CHANGE ORDER FORM 1239 Willow Lake Blvd Vadnais Heights, MN 55110 Change Order No. 001 Phone: (651) 766-2700 Fax: (651) 766-2701 TO: Poulos Construction Co. JOB NAME: Yorkville, IL Well 7 ATTN: Tim Curtin JOB NUMBER: 503251 PURSUANT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PURCHASE ORDER, THE UNDERSIGNED PARTIES TO SAID CONTRACT DESIRE TO MODIFY SAME BY CHANGING THE EQUIPMENT AND/OR LABOR TO BE FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SAID CONTRACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CERTAIN INSTRUL ZION REQUESTS, PLANS AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS OF IN THE FOLLOWING PARTICULARS: ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE AND STATEMENT OF REASON AMOUNT 1 Brine Pump System: $518.00 • Per EEI. Programming services to monitor Brine Pump High Lubricant Level and provide pump alarm. Includes programming updates to PLC, PanelView and HMI Software. Tim Farrell advised USFCS on 8/25/04 that Brine pump shutdown is not required. • Revised documentation updates. NOTE: Quote does not include brine pump sensors or sensing relay. These items are furnished and installed by others in the Brine Drive Panel. 2 Well Vent Valve Additions: $1,190.00 • Per EEI's request; The MCC will be revised to delay shutoff of the well pump f"t until the vent valve has fully opened. The valve is normally open when the well pump starts and when the well flow is reached the valve closes. When the pump is required to shutoff,the valve solenoid will be de-energized and the valve will start to open. When the valve"full open" limit switch is actuated,the pump will shut down. The circuit will be wired so"Hand"operation from the MCC also provides the correct vent valve operation. Additions Include: o Control Relays and Sockets. o Field Services to install relays,terminal blocks,etc., for valve additions in existing MCC o Revised documentation updates. NOTE: Quote does not include any valve equipment such as limit switches,solenoids, etc. Any wiring or conduit required from the valve to the MCC will be provided by others. THIS OFFER OF MODIFICATION IS DEEMED ACCEPTED AND ASSENTED TO BY PURCHASER'IF WITHINA REASONABLE TIME•THE TERMS OF THIS CHANGE ORDER HAVE NOT BEEN OBJECTED TO IN WW!!RITING BY PURCHASER To=SELLER. IT BEING AGREED UPON BY THE PARTIES THAT A REASONABLE TIME FOR OBJEC/ION 15 20 DAYS..FROM THE DATEHEREOF PREVIOUS CONTRACT AMOUNT: $101,478.00 NEW CONTRACT AMOUNT: $103,186.00 IT ISFURTHER UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS WRITTEN MODIFICA77OV IN NO'WA YADVERSELL YAFFECTS THE,1/ALIDITYAND/OR:ENFORCEABILITY OFALL TERMSAND CONDITIONS OF SAID PURCHASE ORDER'. JUDYSPECIFICALL YAND EXPRESSLY MODIFIED HEREBY Customer Signature Title Date Date Cc: 503251, Job File Kevin Forsman, USFCS Bob Erickson, USFCS Pk/ Coro" United City of Yorkville Memo J , ' Public Works Department EST `- _1836 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 11 rc (3 P �0 Telephone: 630-553-4370 Kendtl Camey LLE r°' Fax: 630-553-4377 Date: November 15, 2004 To: Joe Besco, Chairman From: Eric Dhuse, Public Works Director CC: Art Prochaska, Mayor, Tony Graff, Admi strator, Traci Pleckham, Finance Director, Joe Wywrot, Engineer Subject: Truck Purchases Joe, We have put together bids for the purchase of the following trucks: Sewer Department Utility Truck This truck is a budgeted expenditure in the public works equipment capital budget. This will be a one ton pick up equipped with a crane. The crane will be used for pulling lift station motors from the wet wells. At the present time, we have to call a contractor to do this for us at an average cost of$1000.00 per time. Currently we are pulling at least one pump from each lift station per year for routine maintenance and cleaning. Although this truck may seem expensive, it should save us up to $10,000 per year by not having to call a contractor out to pull the motors. This truck will also be equipped with a snow plow to assist in the plowing operations. Parks Department Landscape Utility Truck This truck is also budgeted out of the public works equipment capital budget. This was proposed to be purchased from this line item in lieu of the street and water department purchasing mowing equipment that will be needed to maintain the new road medians and all of the well sites, booster stations and lift stations. This truck will be equipped with a special landscape bed that allows a mower to drive right into the bed of the truck. This truck will also be equipped with a snow plow to assist in the plowing operations. Engineering Department Truck This Truck Was not a budgeted line item in the public works equipment capital budget. It was a planned purchase by the engineering department for next fiscal year. The current vehicle is a 1987 Chevy pick up that was purchased new by the city and given to the engineering department a few years ago. This truck is to a point where it is unreliable for service. I would propose to purchase the truck now out of the public works equipment capital budget, then get repaid as the engineering capital fees come in. I would also like to upgrade the truck to a 3/4 ton truck and equip it with a snow plow to assist in the plowing operations. This would be paid for by public works since it is not needed by engineering. Each of these trucks is being purchased through the State purchase program. I have attached a worksheet completed by Scott Sleezer that outlines the cost of each truck. I would ask that this be placed on the November 22nd public works agenda for discussion. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: ERIC DHUSE FROM: SCOTT SLEEZER SUBJECT: TRUCKS DATE: 11/16/2004 CC: LAURA BROWN Eric, Here are individual prices on the truck you asked for. The State of Illinois has just renewed the state purchase program with the Ford Motor Company for next year. These vehicles will be purchased using state purchasing pricing,contract number PSD 4010659. Sewer Truck This truck is a specialty truck equipped with a crane to lift pumps, motors, and other essential equipment in the operation of our sewer department. This truck will also be able to assist other departments with various tasks due to the equipment this truck will carry. This truck will be four wheel drive and will be equipped with a plow to assist in snow removal. Vehicle Cost $ 56,100.00 Park Truck This truck will be use mainly in the operations of turf maintenance. This truck will be equipped with a landscape body, this allows equipment to be driven up onto the back of the truck for transportation. This is a safer way to transport equipment, it allows for better visibility especially along boulevards where a vehicle is stopped in a lane of traffic. This truck will be four wheel drive and will be equipped with a plow to assist in snow removal. Vehicle Cost $ 38,100.00 Engineering Truck This truck will be used in the operation of the engineering department. This truck will be a pickup truck with an extended cab to house all the field drawings necessary to execute field inspections. This truck will be four wheel drive and will be equipped with a plow to assist with snow removal. Vehicle Cost $ 29,800.00 * None of these trucks include title or license plate costs, add $75.00 per unit to cover this item car o United City of Yorkville Memo : ,,.` 't` 800 Game Farm Road EST.kv. 1a36 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: hone: 630-553-8545 ° p Fax: 630-553-3436 4741.E 0.1 Date: November 17, 2004 To: Tony Graff, City Administrator From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer CC: Traci Pleckham, Director of Finance Liz D'Anna, Deputy City Clerk Subject: Well No.8 —Change Order No.1 Attached find one copy each of Change Order No. 1 for the referenced project. This change order, in the amount of a $39,145.50 decrease, is the final balancing change order for this project. The final contract price is $488,802.50. While the up front cost of this project is being paid for by the Grande Reserve developer, the annexation agreement requires the city to grant credits and approve recapture agreements based on the final cost. Therefore it is important that we keep track of and approve any changes to the project costs. I recommend that this change order be approved. Please place this item on the Public Works Committee agenda of November 22, 2004 for consideration. CHANGE ORDER Order No.: 1 Date: September 14, 2004 Agreement Date: September 2, 2003 NAME OF PROJECT: Well No. 8 OWNER: Pasquinelli Development Group, Inc. CONTRACTOR: Layne-Western The following changes are hereby made to the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: ADDED/ ADDED/ UNIT DEDUCTED DEDUCTED ITEMS UNITS PRICE QUANTITY VALUE 2 DRILL 29"MIN. DIA. HOLE FOR 24"O.D. CASING (ESTIMATED 0'TO 100')(ACTUAL 0'TO 97') LF $200 -3 -$600.00 3 FURNISH AND INSTALL 24"O.D. STEEL CASING (ESTIMATED 0'TO 100')(ACTUAL 0'TO 97') LF $116 -3 -$348.00 4 DRILL 23" MIN. DIA. HOLE FOR 18"O.D. CASING (ESTIMATED 100'TO 1278')(ACTUAL 97'TO 930') LF $160 -345 -$55,200.00 5 FURNISH AND INSTALL 18"O.D. STEEL CASING (ESTIMATED+2'TO 1278')(ACTUAL+2'TO 930') LF $59 -348 -$20,532.00 7 FURNISH CEMENT GROUT BAGS $14 -268 -$3,752.00 9 DRILL 17" MIN. DIA. HOLE (ESTIMATED 1278'TO 1400')(ACTUAL 930'TO 1384') LF $140 332 $46,480.00 10 WELL DEVELOPMENT BY HYDRAULIC JETTING METHOD 10b. PERFORM WELL DEVELOPMENT HR $335 1.5 $502.50 11 WELL DEVELOPMENT BY AIR PRESSURIZING 11b. PERFORM WELL DEVELOPMENT HR $380 -1 -$380.00 12 SAND BAILING WITH RIG AND 2 MAN CREW HR $268 -12 -$3,216.00 19 PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BONDS LS $2,100 -1 -$2,100.00 TOTAL -$39,145.50 Justification: The contract quantities have been adjusted to reflect the conditions encountered when drilling the new water well. CO-01 CHANGE ORDER Page 2 Change of CONTRACT PRICE: Original CONTRACT PRICE: $ 527,948.00 Current CONTRACT PRICE adjusted by previous CHANGE ORDER(S) $ 527,948.00 The CONTRACT PRICE due to this CHANGE ORDER will be(increased)(decreased) by: $ 39,145.50 The new CONTRACT PRICE including this CHANGE ORDER will be $ 488,802.50 Change to CONTRACT TIME: The CONTRACT TIME will be (incrcased) (decreased) by 0 calendar days. The date for completion of all work will be October 24, 2003. Approvals Required: To be effective this order must be approved by the agency if it changes the scope or objective of the PROJECT, or as may otherwise be required by the SUPPLEMENTAL GENERAL CONDITIONS. Requested by: 7 : � Layne-Western Recommended by: r �`" En•ineerin. Enter.rises, Inc. Accepted by: j 1 4 ; Pasquinelli Development Group, Inc. Accepted by: United City of Yorkville CO-02 P„,,ENT OF lh ;31”` 9 United States Department of the Interior `' s 4, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 9 4RCH 3 ,aa WATER RESOURCES DISCIPLINE 221 NORTH BROADWAY AVENUE, SUITE 101 URBANA, ILLINOIS 61801-2748 (217) 344-0037 FAX (217) 344-0082 WEB SITE: il.water.usgs.gov/ November 9, 2004 Mr. Anton Graff United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 601560 Dear Mr. Graf: The Illinois Water Science Center of the U.S. Geological Survey is submitting the enclosed proposal to investigate the hydrogeology and water quality of the glacial-drift aquifer in the vicinity of the Nelson Landfill site near Yorkville. If our proposal is accepted the investigation will be used to characterize the hydrogeology of this important aquifer in Kendall County, identify the impacts of waste disposal practices on water quality in the vicinity of the site, and characterize ambient water quality in this aquifer. We anticipate that this investigation will be of use to you in your efforts to return the landfill site to beneficial use and to establish the viability of the glacial-drift aquifer in this area as a source of safe drinking water for your community. Per previous arrangement, Bob Kay of our DeKalb office will be meeting with you and other interested parties on November 16 to discuss the particulars of the proposed investigation. Feel free to call Bob at (815) 756-9207 if you have any questions about the proposal or the investigation it describes. Sincerely, gel Robert R. Holmes, Jr., PhD, P.E. Director, Illinois Water Science Center Enclosure PROJECT TITLE Kendall County Glacial Hydrogeologic Assessment PROBLEM The City of Yorkville, as well as the remainder of Kendall County, north-central Illinois is expected to experience continued rapid residential development. Water supply for the city of Yorkville, and much of Kendall County, is being supplied exclusively by ground water from the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer system. Ground-water withdrawals from the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer system in northeastern Illinois have exceeded recharge, resulting in large drawdowns and (potentially) degraded water quality. These problems, as well as concentrations of radium in the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer above U.S. Environmental Protection Agency health-based standards, have resulted in a shift to alternate water supplies, particularly Lake Michigan and glacial drift aquifers, in parts of northeastern Illinois. The City of Yorkville and other municipalities in Kendall County anticipate expanding use of glacial-drift aquifers to meet the growing demands for water. A sand-and-gravel deposit in the northern part of town, and which underlies much of Kendall County, has been identified as having a great potential for development of municipal-water supplies (Engineering Enterprises Inc., 2001). Development of this aquifer is hindered by a lack of information on the hydrogeology of the aquifer as well as concerns about water quality. Point sources (the Nelson Landfill) (fig. 1) and diffuse sources of aquifer contamination are concerns. In addition, both the city of Yorkville and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) have expressed an interest in redevelopment of the Nelson Landfill for reuse under the Brownfields program. To determine the potential to redevelop the Nelson Landfill, the USEPA has asked the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Illinois Water Science Center to characterize the hydrogeology and water quality in the vicinity of the landfill. To assess the ground-water resources in Kendall County, the city of Yorkville also has asked that the hydrogeology and water quality of the glacial-drift aquifer near the landfill be characterized to help determine the potential for development of a safe municipal- water supply from this aquifer. OBJECTIVES The objective of this investigation is to determine the potential for development of the glacial- drift aquifer in the city of Yorkville and northern Kendall County to be a safe source for municipal water supply. RELEVANCE AND BENEFITS To effectively assess the shallow ground-water resources in Kendall County, the USGS will monitor water levels in monitoring wells, determine aquifer characteristics by aquifer testing, and perform water-quality sampling for a variety of constituents. The data will be published in a report and be made available on the World Wide Web. These data will be used to characterize the geology of the deposit, assess flow directions and water quality, and quantify hydraulic properties that will be used by other investigators to help determine the sustainable yield of this aquifer and the potential for contamination from either point or diffuse sources to degrade water quality. The data are critical to community planners for broad-based planning and managing of water-resources projects. This effort will compliment current (Kay and others, in review) and proposed USGS investigations of the water resources of Kendall County. By focusing on the glacial-drift aquifer in the vicinity of the Nelson Landfill, this investigation will provide a more detailed understanding of hydrogeologic and water-quality conditions in the aquifer throughout the county. This detailed understanding will allow more accurate prediction of the potential for development of the aquifer and the impacts of natural and non-point sources of contamination on water quality in the county. An important part of the USGS mission is to provide scientific information to manage the water resources of the nation. The information gathered by this study will fulfill USGS objectives in aquifer management, impacts of natural geochemistry and diffuse sources on water quality, flow in shallow aquifers, ground-water interaction with surface water, and improved understanding of the hydrogeologic framework of a sub-regional aquifer. BACKGROUND The Nelson Landfill is a closed facility located on East Beecher road 3 miles north of Yorkville, Illinois (NW1/4, SW1/4, section 8, T. 37 N., R. 7 E.). The site occupies about 100 acres, of which approximately 20 acres have been used as a landfill (fig. 2). The landfill is now being considered for redevelopment as a Brownfield site. The landfill overlies, and has contaminated, a sand-and-gravel aquifer (hereafter referred to as the shallow aquifer) that the city of Yorkville is considering utilizing for municipal supply. Site History Sand and gravel were excavated from the site prior to landfilling. Landfill operations began in 1967. Accurate records of waste quantities and characteristics are not available. There are records of complaints regarding open burning, poor operation, and odors. The landfill accepted mostly general refuse and construction debris. An IEPA inspection on March 17, 1971 indicated that approximately 8,000 gallons per week of septic tank sludge, 500 gallons per week of sludge from a packing plant, 500-750 gallons per week from an oil company, 500-1,000 gallons per week of industrial waste consisting mainly of water and ink, and 1,000 gallons per week of plating wastes were disposed of at the site. Some other wastes also were accepted, potentially including paint filter wastes, iron/steel foundry wastes, plating/polishing wastes, and laboratory/hospital wastes. Early reports by State inspectors note the disposal of oily waste and sludge. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (TEPA) became involved with the landfill in the early 1970s. The landfill was no longer authorized to accept septic or industrial waste in the early 1970s. The landfill closed and covered in 1977. In 1974, at IEPA request, synthetic liners and leachate collection systems were installed in disposal trenches, but it is unknown if the landfill is completely lined. No complete leachate collection system is believed to be present. Polyethylene pipes were noted to have been installed in the trenches for leachate collection in January 1975, but the inspector concluded the pipes likely were being crushed by the weight of the fill and the liner was ineffective due to improper sealing and overlap. Although the site is completely covered, the material used as cover and its thickness to not meet IEPA closure requirements. Topography The landfill is situated on along the flank of a northwest-southeast trending topographic ridge, which may be a glacial ice-contact remnant feature known as an esker. The landfill is located on the southeast part of the ridge. Surface drainage along the site is to the east to Rob Roy Creek, located approximately 500 ft east of the site, then south to the Fox River. The area is flat, sloping gently towards the Fox River about 3 miles to the south. Land Use Currently, land surrounding the site is primarily rural (figs. 1 and 2). Agricultural land borders the site to the south, east, west, and northeast. Several residences are currently located at the northwest edge of the site. Future land use surrounding the site is projected to be entirely residential. Geology Geologic deposits beneath the landfill consist of 50-100 ft of glacial outwash sand and gravel. Apparently discontinuous silt and clay deposits are interspersed with the sand and gravel beneath much of this area. Near Rob Roy Creek there is a clay layer at about 16 ft. However, this clay does not appear to extend to the vicinity of the landfill. The bedrock in this area is composed of dolomite of the Galena and Platteville Groups. Hydrology Water-level data indicate flow in the shallow aquifer is from north to south (fig. 3), presumably toward the Fox River. The depth to water in the vicinity of the site is approximately 10 ft from ground surface. The horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the glacial-drift aquifer was calculated to be about 900 ft/d based on the value from one test. Ground-water velocity through the shallow aquifer was calculated to be 6.9-11.2 ft/d. Water Quality A sample of ponded water at the landfill collected by the IEPA in May 1981 contained 34 mg/L of ammonia, 1.6 mg/L of boron, 2,350 mg/L of chemical oxygen demand, 38 mg/L of oil and grease, 1.14 mg/L of phenolic compounds, 1,800 ug/L of toluene, and unidentified ketones and aliphatic alcohols at concentrations up to 6-7 mg/L. Seven monitoring wells were installed in the glacial drift deposits around the site in January 1985 (table 1)(fig. 4). An oily layer was detected during drilling of well NL-6. These monitoring wells, and five residential-supply wells, were sampled in January 1985. The residential-supply wells also are thought to draw water from the shallow aquifer. Monitoring well N-4, located downgradient of the landfill, contained about 16 ug/L of 1,1- dichlorethene. Aldrin was detected in monitoring well NL-6A at 0.2 ug/L. Vinyl chloride was detected in monitoring wells NL-6 and NL-6A at concentrations of 2.1 and 3.0 ug/L, respectively. Concentrations of vinyl chloride exceeded the USEPA maximum contaminant level (MCL) for drinking water. Elevated (in comparison to upgradient) concentrations of calcium, magnesium, iron, barium, and manganese were detected in the remaining wells, both monitoring and residential supply, but were not at concentrations above MCLs. Additional sampling in August 1987 from five monitoring wells and five residential-supply wells identified the presence of 31 ug/L of chloroethane in well NL-3, 3 ug/L of 1,1-dichloroethane in wells NL-3 and NL-4, and 2 ug/L of 1,2-dichloroethene in well NL-4. Mercury was detected in well NL-3 at a concentration of 4.1 ug/L, above it's MCL of 2 ug/L. Arsenic was detected in well NL-6 at a concentration of 2.8 ug/L. Cyanide was detected in wells NL-4, NL-5, and NL-6 at a concentration of 22, 27, and 44 ug/L, respectively. The presence of these compounds was attributed to leaching from landfill wastes. Semivolatile organic compounds, and pesticides and polychlorinated biphenols (PCBs) attributed to in-situ water quality were not detected in any well. Contamination was not detected in any of the residential-supply wells. APPROACH 1. Phase I Shallow Aquifer Characterization: the existing monitoring wells will be examined to determine their current integrity (presence of locks, damage to casing, presence of sediment infilling the wells, etc.) and, to the extent feasible, rehabilitated. If necessary, wells will be redeveloped by use of a bailer or a Brainard-Killman hand pump to remove sediment. Once redeveloped, water levels will be measured in these wells, slug tests will be performed, and wells will be sampled for water quality (field parameters, ammonia, nitrate, metals, cyanide, and volatile organic compounds) (table 2) as will be described in the Field Sampling Plan. Water samples also will be taken at one location on Rob Roy Creek near the likely point where contaminated ground water may be discharging. The survey and sampling of Rob Roy Creek will be done during a period of low flow. The location where discharge of impacted ground water is occurring will be based on water levels measurements and a survey of field parameters in the stream. These data will provide information on current direction of ground-water flow, aquifer properties, and the type and location of contamination in the aquifer. These data will be collected in the Fall/Winter of 2004 and will be used to help plan subsequent components of the investigation. 2. Development of Site Documents: appropriate documents (Field Sampling Plan, Quality Assurance Project Plan, Health and Safety Plan) will be developed at the beginning of the project and submitted for approval to the USEPA. Sampling activities described in Step 1 will be performed as described in the existing sampling documents for the site. It is anticipated that the existing Health and Safety Plan can be adapted for use for this investigation. 3. Vertical Aquifer Sampling: characterization of the glacial-drift aquifer will be performed by use of a leed screen auger at four borings in the vicinity of the Nelson Landfill. It is anticipated that one of the borings will be located hydraulically upgradient (north) of the landfill and remaining three borings will be located east, west and south of the landfill. The precise location of these borings will be based, in part, on the results of the sampling and water-level measurements performed in Step 1. The borings will be drilled to a depth of 100 ft or refusal, whichever comes first, prior to initiation of sampling. Lithologic logs of the auger return will be made during drilling and each hole will be geophysically logged (natural gamma) to determine lithology at the borehole. Water samples will be collected approximately every 20 ft in permeable (sand or gravel) deposits beginning at the bottom of the borehole and extending upward to the water table. Water samples will be collected from a leed screen auger with a length of 5 ft and analyzed for volatile organic compounds (table 2). It is estimated that five samples will be collected from each boring, at approximate depth of 95-100 ft, 75-80 ft, 55-60 ft, 35-40 ft, and near the water table. Water level measurements will be collected at each test interval and referenced to a standard datum to provide a more detailed depiction of the vertical gradients in the aquifer. Where feasible, single-water aquifer tests will be performed in the test intervals to provide a more detailed depiction of the distribution of horizontal hydraulic conductivity in the aquifer. Access to the landfill and the drilling and sampling sites will be secured by the USEPA, the City of Yorkville, or its designees, as appropriate. Investigation derived solid wastes will be collected and stored at the landfill. The USGS will not be responsible for sampling or disposal of these wastes. 4. Well Installation: after the results of the vertical-aquifer sampling have been analyzed, and in consultation with EPA and other interested parties, single monitoring wells will be installed at each of the boreholes. Wells will be constructed with stainless steel screens and riser pipe and will be constructed and developed in accordance with USEPA standard procedures that will be outlined in the Field Sampling Plan for the site. Well location and altitude will be surveyed by USGS personnel. 5. Phase II Aquifer Characterization: water levels will be measured in all available monitoring wells, slug tests will be performed in the new wells, and all available monitoring wells will be sampled for water quality (field parameters, metals, cyanide, volatile organic compounds, ammonia, nitrate, and major ions) as will be described in the Field Sampling Plan. A minimum of three samples will be collected from Rob Roy Creek (upgradient, at the site, and downgradient) and analyzed for water quality (metals, cyanide, ammonia, nitrate, and volatile organic compounds). The number and location of samples as well as the list of analytes may be modified depending on the results of the Phase I sampling and in consultation with USEPA and the city of Yorkville. The sampling of Rob Roy Creek will be done during a period of low flow within month of the ground-water sampling effort. These data will provide information on the three-dimensional direction of ground-water flow, aquifer properties, and the type and location of contamination in the aquifer. It is anticipated that this data will be collected in the Spring of 2005. 6. Data Analysis and Report Writing: the data will be analyzed and presented in a U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report. The report will have a restricted distribution in print, but will be made available digitally in its entirety on the Illinois District Web site. REPORTS: The results of the investigation will be presented in a USGS Open-File Report to be authored by investigators from the Illinois Water Science Center and potentially other site investigators. Print copies will be available for limited distribution to the public free of charge while supplies are available. The report will also be made accessible through the Illinois Science Center. The USEPA and the City of Yorkville will receive regular updates on the progress of the investigation. PERSONNEL: This investigation will require personnel with a variety of abilities, including familiarity with water- quality sampling and aquifer testing. Personnel with these abilities have been identified and are currently present in the Illinois Water Science Center of the USGS. Bob Kay, a hydrologist with the Illinois Science Center will be the project chief and principal investigator. This investigation is expected to occupy him for about half time for a period of 1 year. FUNDING: The breakdown of costs for this project by work activity and Federal fiscal year is presented in table 3. It is anticipated that the Interagency Agreement between the USEPA and the USGS will be used to fund $50,000 of this investigation. The remainder of the project costs will be paid by use of a Joint Funding Agreement between the USGS and the City of Yorkville, with the USGS contributing $40,000 to this project and the City of Yorkville contributing $53,139 over the period of investigation ($45,108 in fiscal 2005 and $8,030 in fiscal 2006). SCHEDULE: This project is anticipated to begin in November 2004. Field activities will be completed by June 2005. Data analysis and report writing will commence in December 2004 and will be completed by August 2005. The report will be sent for colleague review by October 2005 and published by September 2006. A detailed schedule is presented in table 4. Table 1. Monitoring well information, Nelson Landfill site. Well Depth (feet below land Well name surface) NL-1 29 NL-2 35 NL-3 29 NL-4 23 NL-5 30 NL-6 28 NL-6A 13 Table 2. List of analytes, Nelson Landfill site. Field Parameters Reporting Limit (ug/L) Dissolved Oxygen Not applicable Oxidation-Reduction Potential Not applicable Temperature Not applicable pH Not applicable Specific Conductance Not applicable Volatile Organic Compounds (EPA Method 8260B) Total xylenes 5 Acetone 10 Benzene 5 Bromodichloromethane 5 Bromoform 5 Bromomethane 10 2-Butanone 10 Carbon disulfide 5 Carbon tetrachloride 5 Dibromochloromethane 5 Chlorobenzene 5 Chloroethane 10 Chloroform 5 Chloromethane 10 1,1-Dichloroethane 5 1,2-Dischloroethane 5 1,1-Dichloroethene 5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5 1,2-Dichloropropane 5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 5 Ethylbenzene 5 2-Hexanone 10 Methylene chloride 5 Methyl tert-butyl ether 5 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10 Styrene 5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5 Tetrachloroethene 5 Toluene 5 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 Trichloroethene 5 Vinyl acetate 5 Vinyl chloride 2 Table 2. List of analytes, Nelson Landfill site (continued). Metals (EPA method 61 E) Reporting Limit (mg/L) Ag 0.010 Al 0.100 As 0.020 Ba 0.005 Be 0.005 Ca 0.500 Cd 0.005 Co 0.020 Cr 0.010 Cu 0.010 Fe 0.050 Hg 0.002 Mg 0.500 Mn 0.010 Ni 0.010 Pb1 0.005, Sb 0.050 Se 0.030 Ti 0.030 V 0.020 Zn 0.010 Sr 0.050 MoI 0.050 Sn 0.050 B 0.050 Pesticides (EPA method 8081A) 'Reporting limit (ug/L) alpha-BHC 0.050 beta-BHC 0.050 delta-BHC j ( 0.050' gama-BHC (lindane) 0.050 Heptachlor 0.050 Aldrin 0.050 Heptachlor epoxide 0.050 Endosulfan I 0.050 Dieldrin 0.050 4,4'-DDD 0.050 Endosulfan sulfate 0.050 4,4'-DDT 0.050 Methoxychlor 0.250 alpha-Chlordane 0.050 gamma-Chlordane I 0.050 Toxaphene 0.500 Endrin aldehyde 1 0.050. Endrin ketone 0.0501 1 Table 3. Cost Estimate for Kendall County Glacial Hydrogeologic Assessment. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year 2005 2006 1. Phase I Investigation 14,294 0 Well Rehab Salaryl 4,379 0 Water levels and Slug Testing Salaryl 1,771 0 Stream Profiling Salaryl 876 0 Sampling Salaryl 1,752 0 Equipment and Supplies 187 0 Lab 5,217 0 Shipping 112 0 2. Development of Site Documents 15,326 0 Salaryl 15,326 0 3. Phase II Investigation 79,982 0 Aquifer Profiling Salaryl 17,515 0 Equipment and Supplies 187 0 Lab 3,740 0 Shipping 640 0 Contractor 20,480 0 Well Installation Salaryl 4,379 0 Equipment and Supplies 11,755 0 Contractor 7,100 0 Sampling, Water Levels and Slug Testing Salaryl 4,379 0 Equipment and Supplies 187 0 Lab 9,088 0 Shipping 533 0 Table 3. Cost Estimate for Kendall County Glacial Hydrogeologic Assessment [continued] 7. Data Analysis, Report Writing, and Report Review 25,506 0 Salaryl 25,506 0 9. Report Drafting and Publication 0 8,030 Salary2 0 5,905 Salaryl 0 1,752 Printing 374 10. Totals j 135,108 8,030 6. Contribution from USEPA 50,000 0 11. Contribution from USGS 40,000 0' 12. Contribution from Yorkville 45,108, 8,030 Table 4. Project Schedule, Kendall County Glacial Hydrogeologic Assessment. Fiscal Year 2005 2006 Calendar Year 2004 2005 2006 O N 1D J F M A iM J J ASONDJ FMAMJ J ASOND Phase I Investigation X X Development of Site Documents XXX X Vertical Aquifer Sampling X X _ _ Well Installation _ X Phase II Investigation X X Data Analysis and Report Writing X XX X _X X X Colleague Review X X X Address Comments _ X Final Approval _ X X Report Preparation X X X Report Publication X - / - KANE CO"_-1i . - J �`l / ..„ , ;/r6�r _ _77,7" itENDALL CO / `� f 6Z ■ . / 1 1 II r` �� ,, J I ^� �� i ft uNots ,� / I! 1 ii 'I �� '�,p °\ QUADRANGLE LOCAT QN BM6 7, �'� If ii ••'j. ---'-:----- , i �� 670 �' .... /J tl1111, 68 �\`t l ' �f Q �', �-, -, \.--, ,�C� • ;� . �- 666 --\� i � 1 — '��° I : • aeras -` , .(i._....//\--),u \�- _i-,1\ J 6s0.K_._ ;�° • 662 ‘•, ./,------,_ i 1 668 i 2 \ ' ''',----' t` i 1647 \. { 1. _� / G 0' ` ^^ r \ 61yi ,` �� o I ( _.------N„;---� C ,•� 8 is 1 2 \ •° ` 7 669 ',4,if}.T T`ai 1 x ? _l; I. 67'YORKVILLE/NELSON LANDFILL •rti$ :� c v 1 �iAA�tti �+�, 1 l G7 �'3Vyti��ii►ta k--,j; /�� O r ' • c..5',,,-Th :✓ k ,' - ter- I 1 ,'f �� 659 i \ • ' ° _ . _.._ 655 ( °O' ^ :../ /—�J J� ••"�--_�_�'I 8th 6.b.5J� " .av f Pit �/ �� ISI � a5 ("`t ;; 650 r ° ( // 1 °I i d rL- o x © / 1 . Sb I !' / �� 17 13 6`5 -' �__ __ t 656 b ° 1 = 1 4-1 r--- 1, _.... . SOURCE: USGS SCALE 0 05 1M1LE iis 0 0S 1 KILOMETER ttr Figure 1. Location of Nelson Landfill site. Cc C � u 1 s U w 4- C CCI SITE BOUNDARY O •. • :) • LANDFILL (VV. ••,,aacess Agricultural Land Q TO ILLINOIS RTE. 47 CORNE,L,. ��� �"i► NE1Lg.1}0.40 SCALE 0 500 1000 1500 FEET a... _ MilimminiiriMENWISMONIMMI Figure 2. Site features. LEGEND ' WATER TABLE CONTOUR LINE . ► FLOW LINE Oa 0 CO s NL-1 :o 79.82 \\ 14.(2 \\ 1 '19O 1 � NL-2 •79.221111111 78,5 NL-6 // 78.96 78'0 pir I 11 =4y 77.5 A� Ilit 77.0 NL-3 \ NL-5 77.34 �� 76.78 • ';\NL-4 • `_ 77.16 SCALE 0 200 400 600 800 1000FEET Figure 3. Water table map in the vicinity of the Nelson Landfill, January 18, 1985. m uU '-R OSTREKO PW-1 ILI . 44o . uj:. NL-1 SITE BOUNDA;Y 0 • C) 4 co • m • a' 7c NL-6A NL-2 NL-6 r • a e • • • 1. t1 -3 ., L �`• NL-4 NL-5 LEGEND • MONITORING WELL M RESIDENTIAL WELL POSS B. BENNETT CHRISTENSEN PW-4 ■ PW-3 L BENNETT m PW-2 SCALE 0 500 1000 1500 FEET sommurommos Figure 4. Ground-water sampling locations in the vicinity of the Nelson Landfill, January 18, 1985. t. QM. `.. A United States Department of the Interior A U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY �4ACH 3 ,a� WATER RESOURCES DISCIPLINE 221 NORTH BROADWAY AVENUE, SUITE 101 URBANA, ILLINOIS 61801-2748 (217) 344-0037 FAX (217) 344-0082 WEB SITE: il.water.usgs.gov/ November 9, 2004 Mr. Anton Graff United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 601560 Dear Mr. Graf: The Illinois Water Science Center of the U.S. Geological Survey is submitting the enclosed proposal to investigate the hydrogeology and water quality of the glacial-drift aquifer in the vicinity of the Nelson Landfill site near Yorkville. If our proposal is accepted the investigation will be used to characterize the hydrogeology of this important aquifer in Kendall County, identify the impacts of waste disposal practices on water quality in the vicinity of the site, and characterize ambient water quality in this aquifer. We anticipate that this investigation will be of use to you in your efforts to return the landfill site to beneficial use and to establish the viability of the glacial-drift aquifer in this area as a source of safe drinking water for your community. Per previous arrangement, Bob Kay of our DeKalb office will be meeting with you and other interested parties on November 16 to discuss the particulars of the proposed investigation. Feel free to call Bob at (815) 756-9207 if you have any questions about the proposal or the investigation it describes. Sincerely, Robert R. Holmes, Jr., PhD, P.E. Director, Illinois Water Science Center Enclosure PROJECT TITLE Kendall County Glacial Hydrogeologic Assessment PROBLEM The City of Yorkville, as well as the remainder of Kendall County, north-central Illinois is expected to experience continued rapid residential development. Water supply for the city of Yorkville, and much of Kendall County, is being supplied exclusively by ground water from the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer system. Ground-water withdrawals from the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer system in northeastern Illinois have exceeded recharge, resulting in large drawdowns and (potentially) degraded water quality. These problems, as well as concentrations of radium in the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer above U.S. Environmental Protection Agency health-based standards, have resulted in a shift to alternate water supplies, particularly Lake Michigan and glacial drift aquifers, in parts of northeastern Illinois. The City of Yorkville and other municipalities in Kendall County anticipate expanding use of glacial-drift aquifers to meet the growing demands for water. A sand-and-gravel deposit in the northern part of town, and which underlies much of Kendall County, has been identified as having a great potential for development of municipal-water supplies (Engineering Enterprises Inc., 2001). Development of this aquifer is hindered by a lack of information on the hydrogeology of the aquifer as well as concerns about water quality. Point sources (the Nelson Landfill) (fig. 1) and diffuse sources of aquifer contamination are concerns. In addition, both the city of Yorkville and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) have expressed an interest in redevelopment of the Nelson Landfill for reuse under the Brownfields program. To determine the potential to redevelop the Nelson Landfill, the USEPA has asked the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Illinois Water Science Center to characterize the hydrogeology and water quality in the vicinity of the landfill. To assess the ground-water resources in Kendall County, the city of Yorkville also has asked that the hydrogeology and water quality of the glacial-drift aquifer near the landfill be characterized to help determine the potential for development of a safe municipal- water supply from this aquifer. OBJECTIVES The objective of this investigation is to determine the potential for development of the glacial- drift aquifer in the city of Yorkville and northern Kendall County to be a safe source for municipal water supply. RELEVANCE AND BENEFITS To effectively assess the shallow ground-water resources in Kendall County, the USGS will monitor water levels in monitoring wells, determine aquifer characteristics by aquifer testing, and perform water-quality sampling for a variety of constituents. The data will be published in a report and be made available on the World Wide Web. These data will be used to characterize the geology of the deposit, assess flow directions and water quality, and quantify hydraulic properties that will be used by other investigators to help determine the sustainable yield of this aquifer and the potential for contamination from either point or diffuse sources to degrade water quality. The data are critical to community planners for broad-based planning and managing of water-resources projects. This effort will compliment current (Kay and others, in review) and proposed USGS investigations of the water resources of Kendall County. By focusing on the glacial-drift aquifer in the vicinity of the Nelson Landfill, this investigation will provide a more detailed understanding of hydrogeologic and water-quality conditions in the aquifer throughout the county. This detailed understanding will allow more accurate prediction of the potential for development of the aquifer and the impacts of natural and non-point sources of contamination on water quality in the county. An important part of the USGS mission is to provide scientific information to manage the water resources of the nation. The information gathered by this study will fulfill USGS objectives in aquifer management, impacts of natural geochemistry and diffuse sources on water quality, flow in shallow aquifers, ground-water interaction with surface water, and improved understanding of the hydrogeologic framework of a sub-regional aquifer. BACKGROUND The Nelson Landfill is a closed facility located on East Beecher road 3 miles north of Yorkville, Illinois (NW1/4, SW1/4, section 8, T. 37 N., R. 7 E.). The site occupies about 100 acres, of which approximately 20 acres have been used as a landfill (fig. 2). The landfill is now being considered for redevelopment as a Brownfield site. The landfill overlies, and has contaminated, a sand-and-gravel aquifer (hereafter referred to as the shallow aquifer) that the city of Yorkville is considering utilizing for municipal supply. Site History Sand and gravel were excavated from the site prior to landfilling. Landfill operations began in 1967. Accurate records of waste quantities and characteristics are not available. There are records of complaints regarding open burning, poor operation, and odors. The landfill accepted mostly general refuse and construction debris. An IEPA inspection on March 17, 1971 indicated that approximately 8,000 gallons per week of septic tank sludge, 500 gallons per week of sludge from a packing plant, 500-750 gallons per week from an oil company, 500-1,000 gallons per week of industrial waste consisting mainly of water and ink, and 1,000 gallons per week of plating wastes were disposed of at the site. Some other wastes also were accepted, potentially including paint filter wastes, iron/steel foundry wastes, plating/polishing wastes, and laboratory/hospital wastes. Early reports by State inspectors note the disposal of oily waste and sludge. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) became involved with the landfill in the early 1970s. The landfill was no longer authorized to accept septic or industrial waste in the early 1970s. The landfill closed and covered in 1977. In 1974, at IEPA request, synthetic liners and leachate collection systems were installed in disposal trenches, but it is unknown if the landfill is completely lined. No complete leachate collection system is believed to be present. Polyethylene pipes were noted to have been installed in the trenches for leachate collection in January 1975, but the inspector concluded the pipes likely were being crushed by the weight of the fill and the liner was ineffective due to improper sealing and overlap. Although the site is completely covered, the material used as cover and its thickness to not meet IEPA closure requirements. Topography The landfill is situated on along the flank of a northwest-southeast trending topographic ridge, which may be a glacial ice-contact remnant feature known as an esker. The landfill is located on the southeast part of the ridge. Surface drainage along the site is to the east to Rob Roy Creek, located approximately 500 ft east of the site, then south to the Fox River. The area is flat, sloping gently towards the Fox River about 3 miles to the south. Land Use Currently, land surrounding the site is primarily rural (figs. 1 and 2). Agricultural land borders the site to the south, east, west, and northeast. Several residences are currently located at the northwest edge of the site. Future land use surrounding the site is projected to be entirely residential. Geology Geologic deposits beneath the landfill consist of 50-100 ft of glacial outwash sand and gravel. Apparently discontinuous silt and clay deposits are interspersed with the sand and gravel beneath much of this area. Near Rob Roy Creek there is a clay layer at about 16 ft. However, this clay does not appear to extend to the vicinity of the landfill. The bedrock in this area is composed of dolomite of the Galena and Platteville Groups. Hydrology Water-level data indicate flow in the shallow aquifer is from north to south (fig. 3), presumably toward the Fox River. The depth to water in the vicinity of the site is approximately 10 ft from ground surface. The horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the glacial-drift aquifer was calculated to be about 900 ft/d based on the value from one test. Ground-water velocity through the shallow aquifer was calculated to be 6.9-11.2 ft/d. Water Quality A sample of ponded water at the landfill collected by the IEPA in May 1981 contained 34 mg/L of ammonia, 1.6 mg/L of boron, 2,350 mg/L of chemical oxygen demand, 38 mg/L of oil and grease, 1.14 mg/L of phenolic compounds, 1,800 ug/L of toluene, and unidentified ketones and aliphatic alcohols at concentrations up to 6-7 mg/L. Seven monitoring wells were installed in the glacial drift deposits around the site in January 1985 (table 1)(fig. 4). An oily layer was detected during drilling of well NL-6. These monitoring wells, and five residential-supply wells, were sampled in January 1985. The residential-supply wells also are thought to draw water from the shallow aquifer. Monitoring well N-4, located downgradient of the landfill, contained about 16 ug/L of 1,1- dichlorethene. Aldrin was detected in monitoring well NL-6A at 0.2 ug/L. Vinyl chloride was detected in monitoring wells NL-6 and NL-6A at concentrations of 2.1 and 3.0 ug/L, respectively. Concentrations of vinyl chloride exceeded the USEPA maximum contaminant level (MCL) for drinking water. Elevated (in comparison to upgradient) concentrations of calcium, magnesium, iron, barium, and manganese were detected in the remaining wells, both monitoring and residential supply, but were not at concentrations above MCLs. Additional sampling in August 1987 from five monitoring wells and five residential-supply wells identified the presence of 31 ug/L of chloroethane in well NL-3, 3 ug/L of 1,1-dichloroethane in wells NL-3 and NL-4, and 2 ug/L of 1,2-dichloroethene in well NL-4. Mercury was detected in well NL-3 at a concentration of 4.1 ug/L, above it's MCL of 2 ug/L. Arsenic was detected in well NL-6 at a concentration of 2.8 ug/L. Cyanide was detected in wells NL-4, NL-5, and NL-6 at a concentration of 22, 27, and 44 ug/L, respectively. The presence of these compounds was attributed to leaching from landfill wastes. Semivolatile organic compounds, and pesticides and polychlorinated biphenols (PCBs) attributed to in-situ water quality were not detected in any well. Contamination was not detected in any of the residential-supply wells. APPROACH 1. Phase I Shallow Aquifer Characterization: the existing monitoring wells will be examined to determine their current integrity (presence of locks, damage to casing, presence of sediment infilling the wells, etc.) and, to the extent feasible, rehabilitated. If necessary, wells will be redeveloped by use of a bailer or a Brainard-Killman hand pump to remove sediment. Once redeveloped, water levels will be measured in these wells, slug tests will be performed, and wells will be sampled for water quality (field parameters, ammonia, nitrate, metals, cyanide, and volatile organic compounds) (table 2) as will be described in the Field Sampling Plan. Water samples also will be taken at one location on Rob Roy Creek near the likely point where contaminated ground water may be discharging. The survey and sampling of Rob Roy Creek will be done during a period of low flow. The location where discharge of impacted ground water is occurring will be based on water levels measurements and a survey of field parameters in the stream. These data will provide information on current direction of ground-water flow, aquifer properties, and the type and location of contamination in the aquifer. These data will be collected in the Fall/Winter of 2004 and will be used to help plan subsequent components of the investigation. 2. Development of Site Documents: appropriate documents (Field Sampling Plan, Quality Assurance Project Plan, Health and Safety Plan) will be developed at the beginning of the project and submitted for approval to the USEPA. Sampling activities described in Step 1 will be performed as described in the existing sampling documents for the site. It is anticipated that the existing Health and Safety Plan can be adapted for use for this investigation. 3. Vertical Aquifer Sampling: characterization of the glacial-drift aquifer will be performed by use of a leed screen auger at four borings in the vicinity of the Nelson Landfill. It is anticipated that one of the borings will be located hydraulically upgradient (north) of the landfill and remaining three borings will be located east, west and south of the landfill. The precise location of these borings will be based, in part, on the results of the sampling and water-level measurements performed in Step 1. The borings will be drilled to a depth of 100 ft or refusal, whichever comes first, prior to initiation of sampling. Lithologic logs of the auger return will be made during drilling and each hole will be geophysically logged (natural gamma) to determine lithology at the borehole. Water samples will be collected approximately every 20 ft in permeable (sand or gravel) deposits beginning at the bottom of the borehole and extending upward to the water table. Water samples will be collected from a leed screen auger with a length of 5 ft and analyzed for volatile organic compounds (table 2). It is estimated that five samples will be collected from each boring, at approximate depth of 95-100 ft, 75-80 ft, 55-60 ft, 35-40 ft, and near the water table. Water level measurements will be collected at each test interval and referenced to a standard datum to provide a more detailed depiction of the vertical gradients in the aquifer. Where feasible, single-water aquifer tests will be performed in the test intervals to provide a more detailed depiction of the distribution of horizontal hydraulic conductivity in the aquifer. Access to the landfill and the drilling and sampling sites will be secured by the USEPA, the City of Yorkville, or its designees, as appropriate. Investigation derived solid wastes will be collected and stored at the landfill. The USGS will not be responsible for sampling or disposal of these wastes. 4. Well Installation: after the results of the vertical-aquifer sampling have been analyzed, and in consultation with EPA and other interested parties, single monitoring wells will be installed at each of the boreholes. Wells will be constructed with stainless steel screens and riser pipe and will be constructed and developed in accordance with USEPA standard procedures that will be outlined in the Field Sampling Plan for the site. Well location and altitude will be surveyed by USGS personnel. 5. Phase II Aquifer Characterization: water levels will be measured in all available monitoring wells, slug tests will be performed in the new wells, and all available monitoring wells will be sampled for water quality (field parameters, metals, cyanide, volatile organic compounds, ammonia, nitrate, and major ions) as will be described in the Field Sampling Plan. A minimum of three samples will be collected from Rob Roy Creek (upgradient, at the site, and downgradient) and analyzed for water quality (metals, cyanide, ammonia, nitrate, and volatile organic compounds). The number and location of samples as well as the list of analytes may be modified depending on the results of the Phase I sampling and in consultation with USEPA and the city of Yorkville. The sampling of Rob Roy Creek will be done during a period of low flow within month of the ground-water sampling effort. These data will provide information on the three-dimensional direction of ground-water flow, aquifer properties, and the type and location of contamination in the aquifer. It is anticipated that this data will be collected in the Spring of 2005. 6. Data Analysis and Report Writing: the data will be analyzed and presented in a U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report. The report will have a restricted distribution in print, but will be made available digitally in its entirety on the Illinois District Web site. REPORTS: The results of the investigation will be presented in a USGS Open-File Report to be authored by investigators from the Illinois Water Science Center and potentially other site investigators. Print copies will be available for limited distribution to the public free of charge while supplies are available. The report will also be made accessible through the Illinois Science Center. The USEPA and the City of Yorkville will receive regular updates on the progress of the investigation. PERSONNEL: This investigation will require personnel with a variety of abilities, including familiarity with water- quality sampling and aquifer testing. Personnel with these abilities have been identified and are currently present in the Illinois Water Science Center of the USGS. Bob Kay, a hydrologist with the Illinois Science Center will be the project chief and principal investigator. This investigation is expected to occupy him for about half time for a period of 1 year. FUNDING: The breakdown of costs for this project by work activity and Federal fiscal year is presented in table 3. It is anticipated that the Interagency Agreement between the USEPA and the USGS will be used to fund $50,000 of this investigation. The remainder of the project costs will be paid by use of a Joint Funding Agreement between the USGS and the City of Yorkville, with the USGS contributing $40,000 to this project and the City of Yorkville contributing $53,139 over the period of investigation ($45,108 in fiscal 2005 and $8,030 in fiscal 2006). SCHEDULE: This project is anticipated to begin in November 2004. Field activities will be completed by June 2005. Data analysis and report writing will commence in December 2004 and will be completed by August 2005. The report will be sent for colleague review by October 2005 and published by September 2006. A detailed schedule is presented in table 4. Table 1. Monitoring well information, Nelson Landfill site. Well Depth (feet below land Well name surface) NL-1 29 NL-2 35 NL-3 29 NL-4 23 NL-5 30 NL-6 28 NL-6A 13 Table 2. List of analytes, Nelson Landfill site. Field Parameters Reporting Limit (ug/L) Dissolved Oxygen Not applicable Oxidation-Reduction Potential Not applicable Temperature Not applicable pH Not applicable Specific Conductance T- - - I - Not applicable pp ble Volatile Organic Compounds (EPA Method 8260B) Total xylenes 5' Acetone 0 Benzene 5 Bromodichloromethane 5 Bromoform 5 Bromomethane 10 2-Butanone10''. Carbon disulfide 5 Carbon tetrachloride 5 Dibromochloromethane 5 Chlorobenzene 5 Chloroethane 10 Chloroform 5 Chloromethane 10. 1,1-Dichloroethane 5 1,2-Dischloroethane 5 1,1-Dichloroethene 5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 5 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5 1,2-Dichloropropane 5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 5 trans-1,3-Dichloro_propene 5 Ethylbenzene 5 2-Hexanone 10. Methylene chloride 5 Methyl tert-butyl ether 5 4-Meth I-2- entanone 10 Styrene 5:- 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5; Tetrachloroethene 5 Toluene 5 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 Trichloroethene 5 Vinyl acetate 5 Vinyl chloride 2 Table 2. List of analytes, Nelson Landfill site (continued). Metals (EPA method 61 E) j Reporting Limit (mg/L) Ag 0.010 Al 1 0.100' As 0.020 Ba 0.0051 Be 0.005 Ca 0.500, Cd 0.005' Co0 r 00. 000201 _ - Cu 0.010 Fe0.050 Hg_- 0.002', - ---_ - Mg 0.500 Mn 0.010 Ni 0.010'. Pb 0.005 Sb 0.050 Se 0.030 Ti 0.030 V 0.020 Zn 0.010 Sr 0.050. Mo 0.050 Sn 0.050 B 0.050 Pesticides (EPA method 8081 A) Reporting limit (ug/L) alpha-BHC 0.050 beta-BHC 0.050 delta-BHC 0.050 gama-BHC (lindane) 0.050 Heptachlor 0.050 Aldrin 0.050 Heptachlor epoxide 0.050. Endosulfan I 0.050 Dieldrin 0.050 4,4'-DDD 0.050 Endosulfan sulfate 0.050 4,4'-DDT 0.050 Methoxychlor 0.250 alpha-Chlordane 0.050 gamma-Chlordane 0.050 Toxaphene 0.500 Endrin aldehyde 0.050. Endrin ketone 0.050 Table 3. Cost Estimate for Kendall County Glacial Hydrogeologic Assessment. Fiscal Year Fiscal Year ', 2005 2006 1. Phase I Investigation 1 14,29411 01 Well Rehab 1 I Salaryl 4,379! 0 Water levels and Slug Testing Salaryl 1,771 0 Stream Profiling Salary1 876 0 Sampling Salaryl 1,752; 0 Equipment and Supplies 187 0 Lab 5,217 0 Shipping 112 0 2. Development of Site Documents 15,326 0 Salaryl 15,326 0 3. Phase II Investigation 79,982 0 Aquifer Profiling Salaryl 17,515 0 Equipment and Supplies 187 0 Lab 3,740, 0 Shipping 640 0 Contractor 20,480 0 Well Installation Salaryl 4,379 0 Equipment and Supplies 11,755 0 Contractor 7,100 0 Sampling, Water Levels and Slug Testing Salaryl 4,379 0 Equipment and Supplies 187 0 Lab 9,088 0 Shipping 533 0 Table 3. Cost Estimate for Kendall County Glacial Hydrogeologic Assessment [continued] 7. Data Analysis, Report Writing, and Report Review 25,506 0 Salaryl 25,5061 01 9. Report Drafting and Publication 01 8,030' Salary2 0 5,905 Salaryl - _ 0 1,7521 Printing 374 10. Totals 135,1081 8,030. 6. Contribution from-� - - USEPA 50,000 0, 11. Contribution from USGS 1 40,000' 0 12. Contribution from Yorkville 45,108' 8,030 Table 4. Project Schedule, Kendall County Glacial Hydrogeologic Assessment. Fiscal Year 1 2005 1 2006 1 I S T 1D 2004 , J F IM A MIJ J TAIS O�, Calendar Year OND 2005 A S_ J 'O N D JF M A M J N_ 20061 Phase Investigation X X1 T Development of Site , 1 Documents , IX Vertical Aquifer 1 Sampling X X Well Installation X Phase ll Investigation X X Data Analysis and Report Writing XXXXXXX Colleague Review X X X Address Comments X Final Approval X X Report Preparation X X X Report Publication X It—r, ,) iCANE c VI`s • . T -77_777-7, 1 I ,Irl ,i k - e� T KENDALL CO -{yea i � ' °%/ It ri 1r 6 f J i ! QUACRANGLE�_OCArOri 8M 67,7 I, ,.1--11..,5,i/67,_,...;.6-'440::1-216,„ 632 /- tt.c ,, /r ,/ ' 6'121 '1�✓ 663‘,....,..".,_, ,�--�� ,�'\�.1/ Jr^`l 1 L'6do \`, ,,,,,_,.‘,.:'°,,,i ;1..,) :___:._7. j.,.„,,,,' / \� c./J sss 1 � �.j _ � 3 t \ f t ,.,,_,,,,,,,,1:1,. .,-,., ) o �o ==='issH 1 .,i 647 __�i 1 ._-.� �_'� �� I1� % �� ���\✓' C�'i'.� �� S \ / 67'YORKVI LLE/NELSON LANDFILL '1�F f� a� V" c�a , Q , i /\.____N [ r 65p� �I} o �'�✓ , J r / _� V % 659 \, a 655 �s----� ----,' / i /^�;. .�1 8715i' .av�i Pit i.l i 2 i \---„, rII 7 1 U / / 501 o C/ / ! It I • OI I i i C i� ©� v • --------7, 7Co cr- 13 1' .0,:5 �r 'C :..2a 656 I 1,, ��. _ .... — (11 rin. SOURCE: USGSSCALE 0 OSSMILE i mss 0 01 KILOMETER aima Figure 1. Location of Nelson Landfill site. O ff I t CC L W SITE BOUNDARY • LANDFILL • • Agricultural Land ❑ TO ILLINOIS RTE. 47 ROAO SCALE 0 50O 1000 15O0FEET urremmoimommommunim ....■ Figure 2. Site features. LEGEND WATER TABLE CONTOUR LINE 1\ \ . . ammaimpo.. FLOW LINE03,\ 0 - _ ) .. O CO s NL-1 m 79.82 \� 1g6 \\ 11 NL-2 0 79.227g,5 -6 // 78.96 illO 441110 78.0 ,,,, i .144 77.5 ,1.2z:::.. 77.0 NL-3 ` NL-5 77.34 ``� 76.7 8 NL-4 •i / 77.16 • �~_ SCALE 0 200 400 600 800 1000FEET Figure 3. Water table map in the vicinity of the Nelson Landfill, January 18, 1985. C U I I W OSTREKO Mo PW-1 0 � CCI • uj: NL-1 SITE BOUNOA;Y 0 n 0 • NL-6A NL-2 NL-6 R R !4 l444 -3 44 NL `'�• •... •..: NL-4 NL-5 LEGEND • MONITORING WELL ▪ RESIDENTIAL WELL POSS B. BENNETT PW-4 ■ PW-3 L BENNETT PH4NRITENN PW-2 i SCALE q 500 1000 1500 FEET Mina Figure 4. Ground-water sampling locations in the vicinity of the Nelson Landfill, January 18, 1985. Page 1 of 1 Lisa Pickering From: Annette tll�illiams[awilliams@yorkville.il.us] Sent: Monday, November 22,2004 2:35 PM To: Idanna@yorkviile.ii.us Cc: Ipickering@yorkville.itus Subject: FW: Proposal to Perform Hydrogeologic Assessment Activities FYI. Joe was taking copies to the public works committee meeting tonight Annette Original Message From: Sarah Rupiper[mailto:srupiper@cecinc.com] Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 12:47 PM To: awilliams@yorkville.il.us Subject: Proposal to Perform Hydrogeologic Assessment Activities Per discussion with Mark Waxali, please find the attached proposal. Sincerely, Sarah E. Rupiper Civil &Environmental Consultants 3041 Woodcreek Drive,Suite 210 Downers Grove,Illinois 60515-5417 Phone:630-963-6026 ext.10 Toll free:877-963-6026 Fax:630-963-6027 Email:srupiper@cecinc.com Website:www.ceciFIC_COM 11/24/2004 November 21,2004 Mr.Tony Graff City Administrator United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville,IL 60560 Subject Proposal to Perform Hydrogeologic Assessment Activities Nelson Landfill,Yorkville CEC Proposal No.042188 Dear Mr. Graff: Civil&Environmental Consultants,Inc.(CEC)is pleased to provide this proposal to perform services associated with the planned investigation of the hydrogeology and water quality of the glacial-drift aquifer in the vicinity of Nelson Landfill in Yorkville,Illinois. CEC will provide services,on behalf of the United City of Yorkville (Yorkville) associated with the review and oversight of work to be performed by the Illinois Water Science Center of the U.S.Geological Survey(USGS). The following paragraphs contain background information of the landfill gathered from historical documents, and discussions of the proposed scope of work,the cost estimates to complete the scope of work, and schedule. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Nelson Landfill is located within Kendall County, approximately 3 miles north of the City of Yorkville (Yorkville). The 20-acre landfill operated between 1967 and 1977 on a property that was reportedly an abandoned sand and gravel pit. Available historical information reveals that the landfill operators accepted a variety of wastes including mixed municipal,sludge,industrial,and construction debris. The USGS has proposed to complete an investigation to characterize the hydrogeology of the glacial- drift aquifer and to identify impacts of waste disposal practices on water quality in the vicinity of the site. The USGS proposal indicated that funding for the investigation was to be provided,in part,by the USGS and the United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA). The objective of the USGS work is to determine the potential for development of the glacial-drift aquifer in the City of Yorkville and northern Kendall County to be a safe source for municipal water supply. Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Chicago 3041 Woodcreek Drive Plttsburph 800/385-2324 Suite 210 Cincinnati 800/759-5814 Columbus 888/598.6808 Downers Grove,Illinois 60515-54171 ri. Export 800/899-3610 Phone 630/963.60 1 lin e 1 t -- Indianapolis 877/748-0749 Fax 630/963-6027 Nashville 800/763-2328 ToN Free 877/963-6026 St.Louis 866.250-3679 E mail chic agoeoacinc.com Corporate Web Site http//www.cecinc.com Hydrogeologic Assessment Proposal November 21,2004 Page 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES CEC will complete the following scope of work items(Tasks): • Task 1: Prepare and Submit Grant Applications • Task 2: Review Historical Landfill Water Quality Data • Task 3: Perform Site Visit with USGS Personnel • Task 4: Review Documents Prepared by USGS • Task 5: Perform Surface Water Quality Sampling and Analyses • Task 6: Coordinate efforts with EEI and USGS These tasks are described in the following paragraphs. Task 1• Prepare and Submit Grant Applications CEC will prepare and submit the necessary grant applications to the USGS and the USEPA. These applications were presented by Bob Kay during our meeting on November 16. CEC will prepare the applications for review by Yorkville personnel prior to submittal to the respective agencies. Task 2: Review Historical Landfill Water Quality Data CEC has obtained landfill related documents from the Kendall County Solid Waste Commission,and the United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA). CEC will review water quality data to determine the parameters and concentrations identified at monitoring wells on site. This information will be used to develop the investigation work plans. Task 3: Perform Site Visit with USGS Personnel CEC shall perform a site visit with USGS personnel to assess the conditions of the monitoring wells currently on site. This assessment will establish the need for the wells to be developed, sparged, repaired,etc. USGS personnel will be collecting samples from these wells for analyses as part of the proposed investigation. Task 4: Review Documents Prepared by USGS CEC shall review documents prepared by USGS personnel prior to the start of field activities. These documents include but may not be limited to Field Sampling Plan,Quality Assurance Project Plan,and a Health and Safety Plan. CEC will also review final work products prepared by the USGS on behalf of Yorkville.Comments generated by CEC personnel during this review will be forwarded to the USGS for incorporation into the respective documents. Task 5: Perform Surface Water Quality Sampling and Analyses Water samples will be taken from one location within Rob Roy Creek during a period of low flow. This sample will be collected during the fall/winter of 2004. The data will be used to identify potential impacts to the creek by the landfill,and may be used in the planning of the field activities proposed by the USGS. Hydrogeologic Assessment Proposal November 21,2004 Page 3 Task 6: Coordinate Efforts with EEI and USGS CEC will coordinate efforts with FRI,Yorkville's Civil Engineers and USGS to define specific work activities that may be necessary to characterize landfill impacts. Based on information provided by RF.I, we anticipate 4 meetings in Yorkville to discus the initial work plan,perform status reviews and to convey our comments on the draft report's. CEC work will focus on the landfill and its impacts on the aquifer. It is our understanding that EEl will provide guidance with defining the aquifer as a potable source and with the Shallow Well Siting Program. ESTIMATED COSTS CEC can complete these tasks for the following Not-to-Exceed amount of$15,500. Additional work beyond the scope of services presented in this proposal shall be approved by Yorkville prior to the start of such work. Our schedule of Terms and Conditions,which apply to the proposed work,is attached. Your written authorization to proceed will form a binding contract and indicates your acceptance of our Terms and Conditions!and the conditions of this proposaL SCHEDULE CEC can begin work immediately upon receipt of written authorization to proceed. Authorization may be issued by endorsing the indicated space on the last page 4 of this proposal and may be received by mail or facsimile at the address and facsi+ile number identified in the letterhead of the first page. Please contact either of the undersigned at (630) 963-6026 if you have any questions regarding this proposal or if you need additional information. Sincerely, Civil&Environmental Consultants, Ina Mark Z.Waxali,P.E. Senior Project Manager • cc: Joe Wywrot,P.E. Hydrogeologic Assessment Proposal November 21,2004 Page 4 AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED:CEC Proposal No. 042188 Signature: Date: Printed Name: Title: Phone Number: Facsimile Number MEMO (if To: Tony Graff Joe Wywrot, P.E. From: Jeffrey W. Freeman, P.E. Engineering Enterprises, Ino_ Date: November 19, 2004 (Revised: November 22, 2004) Re: Shallow Well Siting Analysis EEI Job #: Y00224 It should be clear that the City has made excellent progress in expanding the Water Works System to meet, and exceed, the growing water demand throughout the community. Expansion of the Water Works System has been, or currently is being, implemented on all of the system components, namely supply, treatment, distribution, storage, and controls. More specifically, three new deep sandstone wells have been drilled, and corresponding treatment facilities are being constructed, so these new sources of supply can be integrated into the system. With the addition of a treatment facility for the combined treatment of the City's two existing wells, the City will have the ability to utilize five deep sandstone water wells throughout the Water Works System, and have the ability to supply over 7,000,000 gallons of water per day to the City's water consumers. Nevertheless, even with these additions, it also should be clear that the capacity of these water supply improvements will someday be reached, and additional supply and treatment improvements will be required in the future. As you may recall, our firm has continued to work with the City to identify all appropriate sources of potable water supply that could be utilized in the vicinity of Yorkville. While the City currently depends on the deep sandstone groundwater for all of its water supply, another possible component, shallow groundwater, continues to remain as another viable, sustainable alternative. Through our investigations as part of the Water Works System Needs Assessment and Project Plan (July 2000), we identified the good potential for shallow sand and gravel deposits on the north side of the community. The recently released draft Water Resources of Kendall County, Illinois, prepared by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), agrees with that finding. You may also recall that as part of our review of the shallow groundwater, we also conducted an environmental database search. Through this search, the location of the now abandoned Nelson's Landfill was reiterated. Based on further research into the landfill's history, and the potential hydraulic connection of the abandoned landfill to the sand and gravel deposits on the north side of the community, it had appeared that additional hydrogeological review should be conducted within the vicinity of the landfill. Primarily through your facilitation, the City has continued to keep a watchful eye on funding opportunities, especially situations where outside agencies will help fund the work, to further review the groundwater near Nelson's landfill. The recently submitted proposal by the USGS appears to provide this opportunity with a significant amount of federal funding attached. United City of Yorkville November 19, 2004 (Revised: November 22, 2004) Page 2 Per your request, we have reviewed the USGS proposal, and we also attended the meeting at City Hall on Tuesday, November 16 where the proposal was discussed in detail. Based on our review of the proposal, and the need for the City to further plan to diversify the source of supply, we highly recommend considering this investment. With this investment, the USGS will conduct field and office research to characterize the hydrogeology in the vicinity of the Nelson's Landfill. In addition, the water quality sampling that they are proposing can also be used to determine if the landfill is affecting the water quality within the shallow sand and gravel deposits in the area. With this information, the City will have a better understanding of whether it is appropriate to further explore the siting of a sand and gravel water well, or multiple sand and gravel water wells within the northern planning area. Acting as your Water Works System planning consultants, we propose to work with the City Council and City Staff to monitor the progress of the USGS investigation. We also will help review the findings of the investigation, and help determine how the results of the study affect the shallow groundwater siting options. As part of our work within this process, we anticipate between 3 — 5 progress/update meetings and then the review and commentary on the final report. We estimate that our time on this project would result in fees between $3,000 - $5,000. As you may recall, we currently are under contract (February 11, 2003 contract with February 19, 2003 Notice To Proceed) with the City for a Shallow Well Siting Program. The fees for this work were proposed to be hourly with a budget estimate of $35,000. We would propose that the February 11, 2003 contract for the Shallow Well Siting Program be amended to include the work for this task. If you have any questions, or comments do not hesitate to contact me. AMENDED AGREEMENT APPROVAL AND NOTICE TO PROCEED: Mayor— United City of Yorkville City Clerk— United City of Yorkville Date pc: Art Prochaska — Mayor (Fax: 553-7575) Eric Dhuse — Director of Public Works (Fax: 553-4377) Robert R. Holms, Jr., PHD, P.E. — USGS (Fax: (217)344-0082) Bob Kay— USGS (Fax: (815)756-9214) Mark Waxali, P.E. — CEO (Fax: 963-6027) JKM, JTW, TPF, ARD — EEI G:\Public\Yorkville12002\700224 Shallow Well Siting Analysis\Doc\M Graff 02.doc i41\0, United City of Yorkville County Seat of Kendall County EST. M LLg 1836 800 Game Farm Road 1 CO Yorkville,Illinois 60560 R s � Q Phone:630-553-4350 V'LL'Z;t Fax:630-553-7575 4LE February 19, 2003 Mr. Jeff Freeman Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 Re: Water Works System Improvements Dear Jeff: This letter shall serve as your Notice to Proceed with the engineering services for the referenced project. The project has been revised to provide Cation Exchange treatment for radium removal, changes to the distribution watermain routing, additional work related to a new south pressure zone, and engineering for a new well. The new agreement supersedes previous agreements regarding this project. Attached find one copy of the fully executed agreement for your files. The proposal was approved by our City Council at their meeting on February 11, 2003. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at 553-4350. Very truly yours, Joseph Wywrot City Engineer FEB 2 5 2003 L_ Cc: Tony Grath City Administrator Liz D'Anna, Deputy City Clerk tt 52 Wheeler Road • Sugar Grove. IL 60554 TEL: 630/466-9350 FAX: 630/466-9380 www.eelweb.com EnglnNring Ent I P IS ' January 21, 2003 Inc. Mayor Art Prochaska City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Professional Engineering Services For Water Works System.Improvements City of Yorkville, Kendall County, IL Dear Art: We have amended our contract for professional design and construction engineering services for the planned Water Works System Improvements to be consistent with the change in size and scope of the proposed projects. We have attached three (3) copies of the contract and supporting documentation for your review and execution. Due to the change from Lime Softening Treatment back to Cation Exchange Treatment as the radium compliance treatment system, we are pleased to report that the total costs for the radium compliance projects has been reduced by more than 50%. The total estimated:cost for the radium compliance improvements is now estimated to be approximately $7,400,000. We have organized the construction projects into four (4) general categories, Contracts A -- D. The two (2) projects beginning with the Contract A designation generally represent projects 'that provide water service and capacity within the North portion of the City. The six (6) projects beginning with the Contract B designation generally represent the radium compliance projects. The seven (7) projects beginning with the Contract C designation generally represent improvement projects that benefit the central and southern portion of the City, and the'one (1) Contract 0 project will benefit the entire Water Works System as a whole. Based-on the current estimate of construction costs for Contracts A - D of $14,803,184, the proposed design and.construction engineering fees are 12% of the estimated. construction costs. We are pleased to report that we were able to maintain the same percentage as the previous contract. Coneviting Englnaars Spaelallsino In Civil Enginaaring and Land Survaying ,Mr. Art Prochaska January 21, 2003 Page 2 Thank you for this opportunity to resubmit. We Look forward to continuing our close working relationship with the City. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully submitted, ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. 9 , /, Jeffrey W. Freeman, P.E. Project Manager JWF/me Encl. pc: Mr. Anton Graff— City Administrator %NO% om 111leers (4;Total) Mr. Joseph Wywrot, P.E. — City Engineer Mr. Eric Dhuse— Director of Public Works Attny. Dan Kramer— City Attorney • PGW, JKM, BPS, DMT- EEI \\eeint\EEI-DOCS1PUBLIC\Yorkville\2001\YO0101 Water Works Projects Proposal\Doc\imayor04.doc 10 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE - tt? AMENDED 3/25/02 gl AMENDED 1/21/03 NDED AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES This Agreement, made this `\ day or , 2043 , by and between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, hereafter referred to as the OWNER, and Engineering Enterprises, Inc., Sugar Grove, Illinois hereinafter referred to as the ENGINEER amends and supercedes all previous contracts: The OWNER intends to construct Water Works System Improvements in Kendall County, State of Illinois and o for which the ENGINEER agrees to perform the various professional engineering services for the design and construction of said improvements. The OWNER intends to construct the improvements as follows: construct the 1,000,000 Gallon North Elevated Water Storage Tank (E.W.S.T.); install approximately 9,600 LF of 16-inch water main along Route 47, including the North Central Booster Pumping/Pressure Reducing Valve (BP/PRV) station to connect the new E.W.S.T. into the existing Water Works System; construct the Wells No. 3 and 4 Cation Exchange Treatment Facility; install approximately 2,850 LF of finished water main (preliminarily sized at 16-inch) along State Street; install approximately 3,740 LF of raw water main (preliminarily sized at 12-inch) to connect Wells No. 3 and 4 to the Wells No. 3 and 4 Treatment Facility and approximately 3,090 LF of finished water main (preliminarily sized at 16-inch) along King Street; construct Water Well No. 6 (deep sandstone); construct the Well No. 6 Well House and Treatment Facility; construct the Well No. 6 Well House and Treatment Facility Lift Station and Force Main (approximately 12,000 LF); construct the South Water Storage Tank; install approximately 2,680 LF of finished water main (preliminarily sized at 16-inch) along Mill and approximately 1,370 LF of finished water main (preliminarily sized at 12-inch) along Van Emmon Street; install approximately 2,800 LF of finished water main (preliminarily sized at 16-inch) along Liberty Street; install the South BP/PRV station; install the South PRV station; construct Water Well No. 7(deep sandstone); construct the Well No. 7 Well House and Treatment Facility; install a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system throughout the Water Works System; and continue the Shallow Well Siting Program. WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises between the parties hereto, it is hereby agreed: SECTION A-PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES The ENGINEER shall furnish professional design engineering services as follows: 1. The ENGINEER will attend conferences with the OWNER, or other interested parties as may be reasonably necessary. 1 REVISED 7/31/01 • ), UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 (Section A—Continued) 2. The ENGINEER will perform the necessary design surveys,accomplish the detailed design of the project, prepare construction drawings, specifications and contract documents, and prepare a final cost estimate based on final design for the entire system. It is also understood that if subsurface explorations(such as borings, soil tests, rock soundings and the like) are required, the ENGINEER will furnish coordination of said explorations without additional charge, but the costs incident to such explorations shall be paid for by the OWNER as set out in Section D hereof. 3. The contract documents furnished by the ENGINEER under Section A-2 shall utilize IEPA endorsed construction contract documents, including Supplemental General Conditions, Contract Change Orders, and partial payment estimates. 4. Prior to the advertisement for bids, the ENGINEER will provide for each construction contract, not to exceed 10 copies of detailed drawings, specifications, and contract documents for use by the OWNER, appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies from whom approval of the project must be obtained. The cost of such drawings, specifications, and contract documents shall be included in the basic compensation paid to the ENGINEER. 5. The ENGINEER will furnish additional copies of the drawings, specifications and contract documents as required by prospective bidders, material suppliers, and other interested parties, but may charge them for the reasonable cost of such copies. Upon award of each contract, the ENGINEER will furnish to the OWNER five sets of the drawings, specifications and contract documents for execution. The cost of these sets shall be included in the basic compensation paid to the ENGINEER. Original documents, survey notes, tracings, and the like, except those furnished to the ENGINEER by the OWNER, are and shall remain the property of the ENGINEER. 6. The drawings prepared by the ENGINEER under the provisions of Section A-2 above shall be in sufficient detail to permit the actual location of the proposed improvements on the ground. The ENGINEER shall prepare and furnish to the OWNER without any additional compensation, three copies of map(s) showing the general location of needed construction easements and permanent easements and the land to be acquired. Property surveys, property plats, property descriptions, abstracting and negotiations for land rights shall be accomplished by the OWNER, unless the OWNER requests, and the ENGINEER agrees to provide those services. In the event the ENGINEER is requested to provide such services, the ENGINEER shall be additionally compensated as set out in Section D hereof. 2 REVISED 7/31/01 '1, UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 1/21/03 (Section A—Continued) 7. The ENGINEER will attend the bid opening and tabulate the bid proposal, make an analysis of the bids, and make recommendations for awarding contracts for construction. 8. The ENGINEER further agrees to obtain and maintain, at the ENGINEER's expense, such insurance as will protect the ENGINEER from claims under the Workman's Compensation Act and such comprehensive general liability insurance as will protect the OWNER and the ENGINEER from all claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance by the ENGINEER or by the ENGINEER's employees of the ENGINEER's functions and services required under this Agreement. 9. The ENGINEER will complete the final plans, specifications and contract documents and submit for approval of the OWNER, and all State regulatory agencies to meet the project schedule(s) as summarized in Attachment A: "Schedule-Water Works System Improvements" dated January 21, 2003. If the above is not accomplished within the time period specified, this Agreement may be terminated by the OWNER. The time for completion may be extended by the OWNER for a reasonable time if completion is delayed due to unforeseeable cases beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the ENGINEER. SECTION B-PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING SERVICES The ENGINEER shall furnish professional construction engineering services as follows: 1. The ENGINEER will review, for conformance with the design concept, shop and working drawings required by the construction Contract Documents and indicate on the drawings the action taken. Such action shall be taken with reasonable promptness. 2. The ENGINEER will interpret the intent of the drawings and specifications to protect the OWNER against defects and deficiencies in construction on the part of the contractors. The ENGINEER will not, however, guarantee the performance by any contractor. 3. The ENGINEER will evaluate and determine acceptability of substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s). 4. The ENGINEER will establish baselines for locating the work together with a suitable number of bench marks adjacent to the work as shown in the contract documents. 3 REVISED 7/31/01 • UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 (Section B—Continued) 5. The ENGINEER will provide general engineering review of the work of the Contractor(s) as construction progresses to ascertain that the Contractor is conforming with the design concept. (a) ENGINEER shall have authority, as the OWNER's representative, to require special inspection of or testing of the work, and shall receive and review all certificates of inspections, testing and approvals required by laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, orders or the Contract Documents (but only to determine generally that their content complies with requirements of, and the results certified indicate compliance with, the Contract Documents). (b) During such engineering review, ENGINEER shall have the authority, as the OWNER's representative, to disapprove of or reject Contractor(s)' work while it is in progress if ENGINEER believes that such work will not produce a completed Project that conforms generally to the Contract Documents or that it will prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the Project as reflected in the Contract Documents. 6. The ENGINEER will provide resident construction observation. Resident construction observation shall consist of visual inspection of materials, equipment, or construction work for the purpose of ascertaining that the work is in substantial conformance with the contract documents and with the design intent Such observation shall not be relied upon by others as acceptance of the work. The ENGINEER's undertaking hereunder shall not relieve the Contractor of Contractor's obligation to perform the work in conformity with the drawings and specifications and in a workmanlike manner shall not make the ENGINEER an insurer of the Contractor's performance; and shall not impose upon the ENGINEER any obligation to see that the work is performed in a safe manner. Attachment 1 - The Limitations of Authority, Duties and Responsibilities of the Resident Construction Observer is attached to this Agreement 7. The ENGINEER will cooperate and work closely with representatives of the OWNER. 8. Based on the ENGINEER's on-site observations as an experienced and qualified design professional, on information provided by the Resident Construction Observer, and upon review of applications for payment with the accompanying data and schedules by the Contractor,the ENGINEER: (a) Shall determine the amounts owing to Contractor(s) and recommend in writing payments to Contractor(s) in such amounts. Such recommendations of payment will constitute a representation to OWNER, based on such observations and review, that the work has progressed to the point indicated,and that,to the best of the ENGINEER's knowledge, information and belief, 4 REVISED 7/31/01 ,, UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 (Section B—Continued) the quality of such work is generally in accordance with the Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of such work as a functioning whole prior to or upon substantial completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Contract Documents, and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation). (b) By recommending any payment, ENGINEER will not hereby be deemed to have represented that exhaustive, continuous or detailed reviews or examinations have been made by ENGINEER to check the quality or quantity of Contractor(s)' work as it is furnished and performed beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER in the Agreement and the Contract Documents. ENGINEER's review of Contractor(s)' work for the purposes of recommending payments will not impose on Engineer responsibility to supervise, direct or control such work or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto or Contractor(s) compliance with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. It will also not impose responsibility on ENGINEER to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes any Contractor has used the moneys paid on account of the Contract Price, or to determine that title to any of the work, materials equipment has passed to OWNER free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests, or encumbrances, or that there may not be other matters at issue between OWNER and Contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid. 9. The ENGINEER will prepare necessary contract change orders for approval of the OWNER, and others on a timely basis. 10. The ENGINEER will make a final review prior to the issuance of the statement of substantial completion of all construction and submit a written report to the OWNER. Prior to submitting the final pay estimate, the ENGINEER shall submit the statement of completion to and obtain the written acceptance of the facility from the OWNER. 11. The ENGINEER will provide the OWNER with one set of reproducible record (as-built) drawings, and two sets of prints at no additional cost to the OWNER. Such drawings will be based upon construction records provided by the contractor during construction and reviewed by the resident construction observer and from the resident construction observer's construction data. 12. If State Statutes require notices and advertisements of final payment, the ENGINEER shall assist in their preparation. 5 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 AMENDED 1/21/03 (Section B—Continued) 13. The ENGINEER will be available to furnish engineering services and consultations necessary to correct unforeseen project operation difficulties for a period of one year after the date of statement of substantial completion of the facility. This service will include instruction of the OWNER in initial project operation and maintenance but will not include supervision of normal operation of the system. Such consultation and advice shall be at the hourly rates as described in the attached "Standard Schedule of Charges", dated January 1, 2003. The ENGINEER will assist the OWNER in performing a review of the project during the 11th month after the date of the certificate of substantial completion. 14. The ENGINEER further agrees to obtain and maintain, at the ENGINEER's expense, such insurance as will protect the ENGINEER from claims under the Workman's Compensation Act and such comprehensive general liability insurance as will protect the OWNER and the ENGINEER from all claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance by the ENGINEER or by the ENGINEER's employees of the ENGINEER's functions and services required under this Agreement. 15. The ENGINEER will provide construction engineering services in accordance with the periods summarized in Attachment A: "Schedule-Water Works System Improvements"dated January 21, 2003 . If the above is not accomplished within the time period specified, this Agreement may be terminated by the OWNER. The time for completion may be extended by the OWNER for a reasonable time if completion is delayed due to unforeseeable cases beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the ENGINEER. SECTION C—COMPENSATION FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES 1. The OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for professional design engineering services in the amount of One Million Twenty Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Forty and 00/100 - Fixed Fee (FF) Dollars ($ 1,027,840 FF )as summarized on Attachment B: "Summary of Compensation for Professional Engineering Services" dated January 21, 2003, and further summarized on Attachments B-1 through B- 16. (a) The compensation for the professional design engineering services shall be payable as follows: (1) A sum which does not exceed ninety percent (90%) of the total compensation payable under Section C-1 shall be paid in monthly increments for work actually completed and 6 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 AMENDED 1/21/03 (Section C—Continued) invoiced, for the preparation and submission to the OWNER and/or IEPA of the construction drawings, specifications, cost estimates and contract documents. (2) A sum which, together with the compensation paid pursuant to Section C-1(a)(1) above, equals one hundred percent(100%)of the total compensation due and payable in accord with Section C-1 above, shall be due immediately after the award of construction contract(s)is approved by the corporate authorities. 2. The OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for the administration of the construction contracts (Construction Administration) in the amount of Two Hundred Forty Seven Thousand Two Hundred Seventy and 00/100 — Fixed Fee (FF) Dollars ($ 247,270 FF ) as summarized on Attachment B: "Summary of Compensation for Professional Engineering Services" dated January 21, 2003. (a) The compensation for the construction administration services shall be payable as follows: (1) A sum which does not exceed ninety percent (90%) of the total compensation payable under Section C-2 shall be paid in monthly increments for work actually completed and invoiced, for the administration of the construction contracts. (2) A sum which, together with the compensation paid pursuant to Section C-2(a)(1) above, equals one hundred percent(100%) of the total compensation due and payable in accord with Section C-2 above, shall be due immediately after the final Contractor pay-out is processed. 3. The OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for the construction staking, construction observation (including the Resident Construction Observer), and the additional consultation and surveying services on the basis of Hourly Rates - HR as described on the attached "Standard Schedule of Charges" dated January 1, 2003. The estimated values are included in Attachment B. (a) The compensation for the construction staking, construction observation (including the Resident Construction Observer), and any additional consultation and surveying services shall be payable as follows: 7 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE • • (Section C—Continued) (1) A sum which equals any charges for work actually completed and invoiced shall be paid at least once per month. 4. The compensation for any additional engineering services authorized by the OWNER pursuant to Section D shall be payable as follows: (a) A sum which equals any charges for work actually completed and invoiced shall be paid at least once per month. SECTION D—ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES In addition to the foregoing being performed, the following services may be provided UPON PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE OWNER. 1. Site surveys for water treatment plants, sewage treatment works, dams, reservoirs, and other similar special surveys as may be required. 2. Laboratory tests, well tests, borings,specialized geological soils hydraulic, or other studies recommended by the ENGINEER. 3. Property surveys,detailed description of sites, maps, drawings,or estimates related thereto; assistance in negotiating for land and easement rights. 4. Necessary data and filing maps for litigation,such as condemnation. 5. Redesigns ordered by the OWNER after final plans have been accepted by the OWNER and IEPA. 6. Appearances before courts or boards on matters of litigation or hearings related to the project. 7. Preparation of environmental impact assessments or environmental impact statements. 8. Making drawings from field measurements of existing facilities when required for planning additions or alterations thereto. 9. Services due to changes in the scope of the Project or its design, including but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, schedule or character of construction. 8 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (Section D—Continued) 10. Revising studies or reports which have previously been approved by the OWNER, or when revisions are due to cases beyond the control of the ENGINEER. 11. Preparation of design documents for alternate bids where major changes require additional documents. 12. Preparation of detailed renderings, exhibits or scale models for the Project. 13. Providing special analysis of the OWNER's needs such as owning and operating analysis, plan for operation and maintenance, OWNER's special operating drawings or charts, and any other similar analysis. 14. The preparation of feasibility studies, appraisals and evaluations, detailed quantity surveys of material and labor, and material audits or inventories by the OWNER. 15. Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by (1)work damaged by fire or other cause during construction, (2) defective or incomplete work of the Contractor, and/or(3) the Contractor's default on the Construction Contract due to delinquency or insolvency. 16. Providing design services relating to future facilities, systems and equipment which are not intended to be constructed or operated as a part of the Project. 17. Providing other services not otherwise provided for in this Agreement, including services normally furnished by the OWNER as described in Section F — SPECIAL PROVISIONS — Owner's Responsibilities. Payment for the services specified in this Section D shall be as agreed in writing between the OWNER and the ENGINEER prior to commencement of the work. The ENGINEER will render to OWNER for such services an itemized bill, separate from any other billing, once each month, for compensation for services performed hereunder during such period, the same to be due and payable by OWNER to the ENGINEER on or before the 10th day of the following period. Payment for services noted in D shall be at Actual Cost(AC), Fixed Fee (FF) or Hourly(HR). SECTION E-INTEREST ON UNPAID SUMS OWNER shall make all payments to ENGINEER in accord with the requirements of the Illinois Local Government Prompt Payment Act, 50 ILCS 505/1 et seq., including but not limited to the penalty provisions contained therein. 9 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE SECTION F-SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES (a) Provide to the ENGINEER all criteria, design and construction standards and full information as to the OWNER's requirements for the Project. (b) Designate a person authorized to act as the OWNER's representative. The OWNER or his representative shall receive and examine documents submitted by the ENGINEER, interpret and define the OWNER's policies and render decisions and authorizations in writing promptly to prevent unreasonable delay in the progress of the ENGINEER's services. (c) Furnish laboratory tests, air and water pollution tests, reports and inspections of samples, materials or other items required by law or by governmental authorities having jurisdiction over this Project, or as recommended by the ENGINEER. (d) Provide legal, accounting, right-of-way acquisition and insurance counseling services necessary for the Project, legal review of the construction Contract Documents, and such auditing services as the OWNER may require to account for expenditures of sums paid to the Contractor. (e) Furnish above services at the OWNER's expense and in such manner that the ENGINEER may rely upon them in the performance of his services under this Agreement and in accordance with the Project timetable. (f) In the event that the OWNER shall bring any suit, cause of action or counterclaim against the ENGINEER, to the extent that the ENGINEER shall prevail, the party initiating such action shall pay to the ENGINEER the cost and expenses incurred to answer and/or defend such action, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs. In no event shall the ENGINEER indemnify any other party for the consequences of that party's negligence, including failure to follow the ENGINEER's recommendations. (g) Guarantee full and free access for the ENGINEER to enter upon all property required for the performance of the ENGINEER's services under this Agreement. (h) Give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever the OWNER observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in the Project or other event which may substantially affect the ENGINEER's performance of services under this Agreement. 10 REVISED 7/31/01 , UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 (Section F—Continued) (i) Protect and preserve all survey stakes and markers placed at the project site prior to the assumption of this responsibility by the Contractor and bear all costs of replacing stakes or markers damaged or removed during said time interval. 2. All original documents, including but not limited to ideas, designs, drawings and specifications, are to remain the property of the ENGINEER, however, the ENGINEER shall provide signed duplicate originals of same to the OWNER. Modifications of any signed duplicate original document not authorized by ENGINEER will be at OWNER's sole risk and without legal liability to the ENGINEER. Use of any incomplete, unsigned document will, likewise, be at the OWNER's sole risk and without legal liability to the ENGINEER. 3. Delegation of Duties - Neither the OWNER nor the ENGINEER shall delegate his duties under this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 4. Extent of Agreement - This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the OWNER and the ENGINEER and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreement, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by the OWNER and the ENGINEER. 5. Governing Law- Unless otherwise specified within this Agreement, this Agreement shall be governed by the law of the principal place of business of the ENGINEER. 6. Access to Records: (a) The ENGINEER agrees to include subsections F-6(b) through F-6(e) below in all his contracts and all subcontracts directly related to project performance which are in excess of$25,000. (b) The ENGINEER shall maintain books, records, documents and other evidence directly pertinent to performance of Agency loan work under this Agreement consistent with generally accepted accounting standards in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Professional Standards (666 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10019; June 1, 1987). The agency or any of its duly authorized representatives shall have access to such books, records, documents and other evidence for the purpose of inspection, audit and copying. The ENGINEER will provide facilities for such access and inspection. 11 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 (Section F—Continued) (c) Audits conducted pursuant to this provision shall be in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. (d) The ENGINEER agrees to the disclosure of all information and reports resulting from access to records pursuant to subsection F-6(b) above, to the Agency. Where the audit concerns the ENGINEER, the auditing agency will afford the ENGINEER an opportunity for an audit exit conference and an opportunity to comment on the pertinent portions of the draft audit report. The final audit report will include the written comments, if any,of the audited parties. (e) Parties under subsection F-6(b) above shall be maintained and made available during performance on Agency loan work under this agreement and until three years from date of final Agency loan audit for the project. In addition, those records which relate to any "dispute" appeal under an Agency loan agreement, or litigation, or the settlement of claims arising out of such performance, costs or items to which an audit exception has been taken, shall be maintained and made available until three years after the date of resolution of such appeal, litigation, claim or exception. 7. Covenant Against Contingent Fees-The ENGINEER warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bonafide employees. For breach or violation of this warranty, the loan recipient shall have the right to annul this agreement without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee. 8. Certification Regarding Debarment—The ENGINEER certifies that the services of anyone that has been debarred or suspended under Federal Executive Order 12549 has not, and will not, be used for work under this Agreement. 9. Affirmative Action — The ENGINEER agrees to take affirmative steps to assure that small, minority and women's Business enterprises are utilized when possible as sources of supplies, equipment, construction and services in accordance with Part 35.3145(d). As required by the award conditions of USEPA's Assistance Agreement with IEPA, the ENGINEER acknowledges that the fair share percentages are 2% for MBE's and 11%for WBE's. 10. In the event any provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid and unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall be valid and binding upon the parties. 12 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AMENDED 3/25/02 (Section F—Continued) 11. The ENGINEER has not been retained or compensated to provide design services relating to the Contractor's safety precautions or to means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures required by the Contractor to perform his work but not relating to the final or completed structure; omitted services include but are not limited to shoring, scaffolding, underpinning, temporary retainment of excavations and any erection methods and temporary bracing. 12. The ENGINEER intends to render his services under this Agreement in accordance with generally accepted professional practices for the intended use of the Project. 13. Since the ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s) methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, his opinions of probable Project Costs and Construction Costs provided for herein are to be made on the basis of his experience and qualifications and represent his best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with the construction industry; but the ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual project or construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by him. If prior to the bidding or negotiating phase OWNER wishes greater assurance as to project or construction costs he shall employ an independent cost estimator. 14. TERMINATION (a) Should the OWNER decide to abandon, discontinue, or terminate the Project at any stage of development, the ENGINEER shall receive seven (7)days written notice and be compensated for their services through the appropriate fee schedule provided for in the Agreement to date of abandonment,discontinuance or termination. (b) In the event the project is delayed for causes beyond the control of the ENGINEER for a period of six months or more, the ENGINEER shall be paid for has services to the beginning of the delay on the basis of actual cost plus 125% to cover profit, overhead and readiness to serve - "actual cost" being defined as material costs plus actual payrolls, insurance, social security and retirement deductions. Traveling and other out-of-pocket expense will be reimbursed to the ENGINEER at his actual cost. 13 REVISED 7/31/01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed, or caused to be executed by their duly authorized officials, this Agreement in duplicate on the respective dates indicated below. (SEAL) OWNER: City of Yorkville By �� 4,46/47 jletATTE Print Name Art Prochaska Print Name Ms. Jackie Milschewski Title Mayor Title City Clerk Date (SEAL) ENGINEER: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. By ATTEST I _ Print Name James K. Michels, P.E. ► red Print Name 3er3 W•ftlELAtild Title President Title $ecretrtty f px3 E-f" ri-fAVIA-6 eft Date Z/1//63 11eeintlEEI-DOCSIPUBLICWorkville120011YO0101 Well No.6 Improvements\Doclagreement.doc 14 REVISED 7/31/01 • • • UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ATTACHMENT 1 to Agreement for Professional Engineering Services THE LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE RESIDENT CONSTRUCTION OBSERVER ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Resident Construction Observer shall act under the direct supervision of the ENGINEER, shall be the ENGINEER's agent in all matters relating to on-site construction review of the Contractor's work, shall communicate only with the ENGINEER and the Contractor(or Contractors), and shall communicate with subcontractors only through the Contractor or his authorized superintendent. The OWNER shall communicate with the Resident Construction Observer only through the ENGINEER. 2. The Resident Construction Observer shall review and inspect on-site construction activities of the Contractor relating to portions of the Project designed and specified by the Engineer as contained in the Construction Contract Documents. 3. Specifically omitted from the Resident Construction Observer's duties are any review of the Contractor's safety precautions, or the means, methods, sequences, or procedures required for the Contractor to perform the work but not relating to the final or completed Project. Omitted design or review services include but are not limited to shoring, scaffolding, underpinning, temporary retainment of excavations and any erection methods and temporary bracing. 4. The specific duties and responsibilities of the Resident Construction Observer are enumerated as follows: (a) Schedules: Review the progress schedule, schedule of Shop Drawing submissions and schedule of values prepared by Contractor and consult with ENGINEER concerning their acceptability. (b) Conferences:Attend preconstruction conferences. Arrange a schedule of progress meetings and other job conferences as required in consultation with ENGINEER and notify those expected to attend in advance. Attend meetings and maintain and circulate copies of minutes thereof. (c) Liason: (1) Serve as ENGINEER's liaison with Contractor, working principally through Contractor's superintendent and assist him in understanding the intent of the Contract Documents. 1 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (Attachment 1 —Continued) (2) Assist ENGINEER in serving as OWNER's liaison with Contractor when Contractor's operations affect OWNER's on-site operations. (3) As requested by ENGINEER, assist in obtaining from OWNER additional details or information,when required at the job site for proper erection of the work. (d) Shop Drawings and Samples: (1) Receive and record date of receipt of Shop Drawings and samples. (2) Receive samples which are furnished at the site by Contractor, and notify ENGINEER of their availability for examination. (3) Advise ENGINEER and Contractor or its superintendent immediately of the commencement of any work requiring a Shop Drawing or sample submission if the submission has not been approved by ENGINEER. (e) Review of Work, Rejection of Defective Work, Inspections and Tests: (1) Conduct on-site inspection of the work in progress to assist ENGINEER in determining if the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents and that completed work will conform to the Contract Documents. (2) Report to ENGINEER whenever he believes that any work is unsatisfactory, faulty or defective or does not conform to the Contract Documents, or does not meet the requirements of any inspections, test or approval required to be made or has been damaged prior to final payment;and advise ENGINEER when he believes work should be corrected or rejected or should be uncovered for inspection, or requires special testing, inspection or approval. (3) Verify that tests, equipment and systems start-ups, and operating and maintenance instructions are conducted as required by the Contract Documents and in presence of the required personnel, and that Contractor maintains adequate records thereof, observe, record and report to ENGINEER appropriate details relative to the test procedures and start-ups. 2 • • , 1 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (Attachment 1 —Continued) (4) Accompany visiting inspectors representing public or other agencies having jurisdiction over the Project, record the outcome of these inspections and report to ENGINEER. (f) Interpretation of Contract Documents: Transmit to Contractor ENGINEER's clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents. (g) Modifications: Consider and evaluate Contractor's suggestions for modifications in Drawings or Specifications and report them with recommendations to ENGINEER. (h) Records: (1) Maintain at the job site orderly files for correspondence, reports of job conferences, Shop Drawings and samples submissions, reproductions of original Contract Documents including all addenda, change orders, field orders, additional drawings issued subsequent to the execution of the Contract, ENGINEER's clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents, progress reports,and other Project related documents. (2) Keep a diary or log book, recording hours on the job site, weather conditions, data relative to questions of extras or deductions, list of visiting officials and representatives of manufacturers, fabricators, suppliers and distributors, daily activities, decisions, observations in general and specific observations in more detail as in the case of observing test procedures. Send copies to ENGINEER. (3) Record names, addresses and telephone numbers of all Contractors, subcontractors and major suppliers of materials and equipment. (i) Reports: (1) Furnish ENGINEER periodic reports as required of progress of the work and Contractor's compliance with the approved progress schedule and schedule of Shop Drawing submissions. (2) Consult with ENGINEER in advance of schedule major tests, inspections or start of important phases of the work. (3) Report immediately to ENGINEER upon the occurrence of any accident. 3 • UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (Attachment 1 —Continued) (j) Payment Requisitions: Review applications for payment with Contractor for compliance with the established procedure for their submission and forward them with recommendations to ENGINEER, noting particularly their relation to the schedule of values, work completed and materials and equipment delivered at the site but not incorporated in the work. (k) Certificates, Maintenance and Operating Manuals: During the course of the work, verify that certificates, maintenance and operation manuals and other data required to be assembled and furnished by Contractor are applicable to the items actually installed; and deliver this material to ENGINEER for his review and forwarding to OWNER prior to final acceptance of the work. (I) Completion: (1) Before ENGINEER issues a Statement of Substantial Completion, submit to Contractor a list of observed items requiring completion or correction. (2) Conduct final review in the company of ENGINEER, OWNER and Contractor and prepare a final list of items to be completed or corrected. (3) Verify that all items on final list have been completed or corrected and make recommendations to ENGINEER concerning acceptance. 11EEINTIEEI-0OCSIPUBLICWorkville120011YO0101 Well No.8 lmprovementslDoc\agreementdoc 4 ATTACHMENT A: SCHEDULE -WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 7/30/01 AMENDED 3/25/02 United City of Yorkville, Kendall Co., IL AMENDED 1/21/03 Contr. 2002 2003 2004 2005 No. ProjectWork Items AS ON D J FM A M JJA S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J t. mama ' e .fA1sztnU1JnmJ ... IEE ' 44-404 �.,44);p: 44.1*-,,:,,,,, i,^-6):,. Cr� 14.,, i it sy..•4 nails at {au 44., -,,:, :tommtmetarmailitilEEN II ~R t EEN K .' w, ^ ; i a��U } [ ti.. ppm �.3.nY2 Jl�'o/Yy tin; �i21 i{ �ig�;10. " w 1 ^ c,-� ".. - �X �?< r'� �?a` ° f:+.ex - . 00 '.N Cf e Paa y �t� d0 ts. �1r°m`�.iil=XS2 Z St"rl�' P Q r `i 4 �' S �[,:" fir' 2MEMNON x IVEMIS ) ,.,t t ,?',� i k < r i,* �SMI � n MEM=�6')"t�VVil C ''JrZ WINELI�'ity , 4 ' t: c ,. "rs�t t m Eros CEA Raja „ , rt{ r is`1*"�_ A���. ° �' t 1.^ c ��,nn:( °�S` t p r r ..,s IMAM I:g l✓ e h� * s• i �i 1mica a�" ' d .0yl 4'4's Wy,•17i,. �! rt16J3 F 3JEIEll), s4, ', qt ! #, y L d♦4 s , EE ? �,y� ,5 �}v� t �yq �'�t P pia k N.�I � W � ME��� "} tt7Mwctc' ^,.Yf,1�5tP�t•L,:�tk?hSI.E Pn.A�IS�C'rA? .J!..� SJYJY� 1 r ,��1 ° +�(J� ^;1`r�i �•• Ott!" r r %.t ;r'', T A.1 North Elevated Water Site Acquisition Consult. Storage Tank Design IEPA Plan Review Bidding and Contracting i II Construction A.2 Route 47 Finished Design Water Main&BP/PRV IEPA Plan Review Station Finalize Easements ' 1111110 Bidding and Contracting Construction 1111i11 B.1 Wells No.3 and 4 Design .■ Treatment Facility IEPA Plan Review Bidding and Contracting Construction II 11111111011.1 B.2 State Street Finished Design Water Main IEPA Plan Review II II 1111111111 11111111I111111111 Bidding and Contracting Construction B.3 Wells No.3 and 4 Raw Design Water Main&King IEPA Plan Review Street Water Main Bidding and Contracting Construction B.4 Well No.6 Design 1111 IEPA Plan Review Bidding and Contracting Construction B.5 Well No.6 Well House Design iligi111111 11110 and Treatment Facility IEPA Plan Review Bidding and Contracting Construction ■.■■. 8.6 Well No.6 WH and TF Design I 11111111 Lift Station and IEPA Plan Review Forcemain Bidding and Contracting IIII Construction -- IEPA Loan Documen- Loan Application Prep. tation .� ResolutionsFinancialSubmittal Debt Authorization Ord. 1 111111 Public Comment IIII. Water Use Ordinance Rev. Application Complete Loan Agreement Issued C.1 South Water Storage Predesign Report Tank Design IEPA Plan Review Bidding and Contracting N ik Construction ■■..■■■.. C.2 Mill and Van Emmon Design iIlll Finished Water Main IEPA Plan Review Bidding and Contracting Construction C.3 Liberty Street Finished Design Water Main IEPA Plan Review Bidding and Contracting Construction C.4 South BP/PRV Station Design IEPA Plan Review Bidding and Contracting II 11111 Construction Ill C.5 South PRV Station Design IEPA Plan Review .. 111111 Bidding and Contracting Construction 11111111 C.6 Well No.7 Designn IEPA Plan Review Bidding and Contracting 11111111 Construction C.7 Well No.7 Well House Design "' and Treatment Facility IEPA Plan Review Bidding and Contracting II ,I Construction D.1 SCADA System Design Integration Bidding and Contracting Construction LEGEND NOTES • Report Work IEPA Loan Application Preparation Some of the project construction schedules will be contingent Design Construction on funding availability from the IEPA Public Water Supply Loan Agency Review Site Acquisition Consultation/Easements Program(PWSLP). Bidding and Contracting Enoin»rino EnbrpAMr.. Ino. ATTACHMENT B: SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 7/30/01 AMENDED 3/25/0 WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AMENDED 1/211103 City of Yorkville,Kendall Co.,IL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION STAKING DESIGN ENGINEERING ADMINISTR. AND OBSERVATION (Contract=FF) (Contract=FF) (Contract=HR) Estimated Total Total Total Total Total Tota -14'6! Constr. Constr. Constr. o r 9. Constr. Direct Engin. Drafting Surveying Admin. :Design Constr.` Administration Staking&Drafting Observ. YCflrStr•,. z Cp ' Contract Project Costs Expenses Expenses Expenses Expenses Expenses es Cost E Expenses Expenses Expenses ria S ,, A.1 North Elevated Water Storage Tank $1,200,000 $1,000 $43,134 $8,664 $3,600 $2,754 9 _.. 4n,. $15,300 $4,000 $13,000e R.47 inished W.M.&BP/PRV Station $897,000 $1,000. , $41,736 $15,864 $9,000 ,•��r.' r '''-::,..,..'.,;_.: 4 r ,� b. $8,970 $13,455 $15,249 IV I 13 Wells No.3 and 4 Treatment Facil' $1,644,500 $3,000 $88,12$ $29,658 $1,944 $2,280 ;$ >•`,r, A,-.' $30,000 $6,000 $37,500 ®; jq fs B_2 State Street Finished Water Main $491,745 $1,000 $21,852 $8,556 $4,860 $1,596 s•: `.. ,�:: $6,900 $6,900 $20,600 x . i1F e �,,E_ B.3 Wells No.3 and 4 Raw W.M.&King St Finished W.M. 1 $1,526,485 $1,000 $70,452 $21,264 $13,470 $4,560 11 1 1% $18,300$18,300 $18,300 $54,900 91,Ss e y ,1w`4r B.4 Well No.6 $544,500 $500 $20,622 $4,032 $2,016 $3,420 30-59b %. 5. K $15,000 $3,000 $15,000 $ 1)00 , B.5 Well;No.6 Well House and Treatment Facility $1,705,000 $3,000 $94,416 $28,068 $1,944 $2,280 7t 8 7.6 $32,000 $7,500 $37,500 :44i,;::::: Vi'' 8.6 W II No.6 W.H.and T.F.Lift Station and Forcemain • $532,400, $500 $30,528 $4,668 $2,016 $3,42fl t1, 32,;' s7 $10,200 $7,500 $19,500 , 0.,, 0_ , w,M, 0% ,,, . : '':.7-:`7E:-:::15 :1-:''4". a-.. 5 `. . .. .,::_ .. .- _ .y',. < :. -a.s _.,. .- C_1 South Water Storage Tank .7; $1,5.00,000 $1,000 $56,886 $9,336 $3,888 $3,078 $74,188:, r49% $19,200 $5,000 $16,300 • 1,,500.: -44-14, C.2 Mill and Van Emmon Street Finished Water Mains $687,450 $1,000 $33,996 $11,736 $4,860 $1,596 $ 3,1$8 ;' 7°,.., $10,000 $10,000 $28,000 = $ :, 0°k .- C.3 Liberty Street Finished Water Main $478,406 $1,000 $20,958 $8,556 $4,860 $1,596 36970 ?;a z $6,700 $6,700 $20,100 $33,000'; 70y6 , A 91x.1 1 C.4 South BP/PRV Station , $444,650 $1,000 $21,666 $8,556 $1,572 $1,596 .390.- 1 7% ? $5,700 $2,300 $14,500 _, l°O C.5 South PRV Station $109,150 $1,000 $7,728 $2,214 $1,572 $456 -$12,970 ' 11 6;`; $2,000 $1,000 $4,600 7,600 : 70%0 C.6 Well No.7 $544,500 $500 $20,622 $4,032 $2,016 $3,420 ,43,045.90_ 5.6% $15,000 $3,000 $15,000 $35,000.,. .41_94_, C.7 Well No.7 Well House and Treatment Facility x1,705,000 $3,000 $94,416 $28,068 $1,944 $2,280 $19,710$; , '.6% $32,000 $7,500 $37,500 ,; t ,„ -$%. , D.1 I. SCADA System Integration $412,500 $13,000 $32,808 $4,974 $0 $1,824 *tit,`, % .I $20,000 $2,500 $7,500 I ii,‘e t t _ G:WUBLICWorkviiIet20011Y00101 Water Works Projects Proposal\Eng'lfee inventory-AMENDED CEAsiSurrmtary 'ADDITIONAL CONSULTATION,SURVEYING,AND TESTING SERVICES ` Estimated Contract 4 Service Costs Type CONTRACT DESIGNATIONS 'PP. 'r Shallow Well Siting Program :' 535,000 HR AC=Actual Cost ='-i Easements and Legal Surveying / $30ti00b HR NR=HOurly Rate With Estimated Fee'. $Federal Grant Application Consultation and Prep. / $15,000 HR _ FF=Fixed Fee Subsurface Soils Investigation And Material Testings $50;000 - AC IEPA Loan Program Documentation _ i $15,000 1112 -- TOTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTATION: $145,000 - Notes Formerly Central City Finished Water Main-North.-project. esFormetly Central City Finished Water Main-South project. {Subsurface soils investigation and material testing costS-are estimated; Work to be completed by another company with EEI coordination ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. SUGAR GROVE.IL • ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 7/30/01 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. ATTACHMENT B-1 CONTRACT A.1 -NORTH ELEVATED WATER STORAGE TANK WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,IL .,:',4-:,,'...,f-,,,1 k �. \:'., 4 ..+'.F � T � ,W�� uid...1L, ..,,;—:-' U A.G.=L^....K.i. 1,��libw.uc...],+v1Rtk�.k.511L+81f�-�YtAST..1M....S+.;6aa�d,r.L.x.:��.iA$,3.•a�i.L:... i4ji'.'.� I. ,�.vF.MJ'.?� ..Lai.wCi� d 1 ::�J Y� v �x.t�E.2 `4.a'.; �.•_.:lal$ „� J:� y,:i.1g""� i�_.rx.�''. � '� T^J �.,, h.T'�:, rT£.^ ,r`4u/ v_ r 'i r..:. ,w :>; v� a '4,. ...� r-C'..3"J.'P... .. e .. wu'.4'� -L \.�a ,,' T. fp, .r,', `q� '.�i-s:jM� t'F;fii•, `'r r. rx, - +. v !v tV�Y a?1;°':4,...,.1({k. "�:�7,�,�,``..� ?�.�+~4.:,yw. ` a.a Fl �Cp �� au t.. ,""�.- e{'��,...�'. y P � ,> a s§ y �.M �. '� a �.t���i "t y-_� 7 iry %� 1, r�1,.. 1. +IC'r w..:'`9�^ F ..;.k irr 9.. :t� l ,75%.7.T'V�.`.•S Wit. i.. �,,fk'4f }.2:,.; y� .ul; tS"r l '/ :N� S: yh �'`S T., f�'1 — +Y` w;2 s`- :t i :r �t x,.44.: Rr fr`L. 't,, t,,,- Y I,1 :p , t;:fr . c ,ui=. � ' �i`9, p t$.:.. . r1 m :As.- ''�: :'.`l,, a. , :. 'i..k. ., ,,.;-a4.,,:�'S- RoJ ...1 ''Kti..'C.. P. ® Ailis ¢A 'Y.. i,,,7 o� -,t iQ,7 ..,e,j /e t �� �' .�r �'i-�� i�:7°<r.. ����.t�' r� c.�*.. `h�, dt. sY�Y , jt9 C.. k.. ak., ,3 t04 :1;,x'1 � „n' < , 'fu "" $� f .. t .n.. C..x k q.d-8* t' yet �/ 'sky �r S L�,- Yr R„ '�Ck". C.:5• ,yd Snrt.4 f:t::,t �Y, ,df e-. �Rlt �;,-4 ak rye+± , S�}.1414d#Yi i A tans§ �' 'Y d.. Y• EEIn...T,. ... A,., � r. »- Y ..I; ,. 6 a' rj �EFf 1 NE��R MA,1 x��z,,j7�.H . '�7E�H�4�'� . � ,�,� .�;-', 'f`EOF1.^!',3rI" .6,7��` °ate C#�,�a 100 Pro'ectMeetin.s 12 16 20 20 68 $6,204 200 Surve in. 8 12 8 8 16 16 16 16 100 $8,052 300 Desi.n Calculations 6 12 50 50 120 $10,314 400 Construction Drawin.s 4 8 50 40 8 40 40 190 $15,342 500 Technical S•eciffcations 4 12 24 32 24 96 $7,416 600 Front End Documents 4 2 8 8 12 34 $2,580 700 En.ineer's Cost Estimate 2 2 6 8 6 24 $1,872 800 Permittin. 2 6 12 12 6 38 $3,090 900 Biddin• 2 8 12 12 6 40 $3,282 IIII MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 38 0 74 194 190 16 56 40 16 16 16 54 710 $58,152 Print•al En.ineer E-3 38 hours 'MIA. $114 •=r hour= $4 332 Printin• $1 000 Senior Pro ect Mana.er E-2 0 hours e' $105 .er hour= $0 Su..lies 8,Misc. Pro'ectMana.er E-1 74 hours WM. $96 .erhour= $7104 Com•uter Senior Pro ect En.ineer/Surve or P-5 210 hours $87 .er hour= $18 270 Trans••rtation Project En.Inver/Surv: or P-4 190 hours a $78 per hour= $14,820 Senior Engineer/Surve or P-3 • 16 hours $89 .er hour= $1,104 DI- T EXPEN ES= 1 000 En•sneer/Surve or P-2 hours ME $60 .er hour= t.. .ineer/Surve or P-1 hours a $51 per hour= CAD Mana.er E-1 16 hoursCf $96 .er hour= $1 536 Engineering Expenses= $43,134 Senior Pro ect Technician T-5 56 hours alr.111111 $78 •-r hour= $4 368 Drafting Expenses= $8,864 Pro'ect Technician T-4 58 hours �• $69 .=r hour= $3 864 Surveying Expenses= $3,600 Senior Technician T-3 hours ® $60 .er hour=- Administrative Expenses= $2,754 Technician T-2 hours a $51 per hour=- TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $58,152 sociate Technician T-1 hours 11111171111111 $42 •er hour= ecreta IIIMMINIEMINEZEMNUEI!♦E0.112Etaka HOURLY TOTAL= 710 TOTAL LABOR= $58 152 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS=I $59,1521 G:\PUBLIC\Yorkvllle\2001\Y0o101 Water Works Projects ProposeeEnOree Inventory-AMENDED CEadsJA.1-N Tank ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 7/30101 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL ATTACHMENT B-2 CONTRACT A.2-RT.47 FINISHED WATER MAIN AND BP/PRV STATION WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY,IL VS� , " ekP Y�S�tF .q )�,;-,',. "4,„:,,‘-2 , 1<��i i -\ ear ":.`.. ,.,,w.d�. <a...m„ w._vx.�dk..-L�„e..�kYrot....,Z�+/�,febe.J.�:a,u�.iv.L'�fi> n.'<.;�11 wr.L.asr.!tr'.i.,i -u:i P,.Y::,x, ..G.�. ������r5������YYY 1 �, � �4 . - eta Ci,,i ::: t7j4;' ., ki r4 S :r' P=1`:;,,,: a-tl � 7 ,#.^ - . ry • � .,,�sr i. p, Gl,, r*;-.4,� � �tYt� -,4�J�'' � <•-. "�a;ra f .�� z-a„- `f '"� ^n� i.�,re•q F. -:'�a, l .r`t i. ,*�, A -�f1 ..- h - �e 6d*•"4 ..:A ,�.r. .g' w',$' _K l t_J:� &�, 4 t. ) � � i .,��+ ia`?f.b ax` Lf �� �,�.?k. ;q SS- . {wva`!so..-A�1�, �i��. ,�, '. S'W � Q 'e � off.esu �_ ".9 � r`Y,i ' Ff� �.,c, r�`x. .�m�. � . ..�'�1a; •.��; "`�a'�--. `�, .:t" � ` � '�.x�; �� ,�, .e r.+� VI -( {:, �y g k •,.•1� '-'7'''',7s*,1 d t•;,;1 � ' e � rx .ti�.�..a :.,v�Si �.�"a�.i c 'li •- a.��- a'1 a p'Y'i. * `�La8' �`• aY n, Vii. i - y1 c a r. r t,t.,R 11 G dINE .I''':. GI•EgR. GER, `"TE.,;iH1 0 ra ffia A' S'S t1 . , �.,Oti;r1, :::, yr -�`4# '� AMA ��. 100 Proect Meetin•s 12 16 20 20 __ 68 $6,204 200 EMUIIIIIIIIIIIII 8 16 24 8 16 8 40 40 40 200 $15,600 300 Desi.n Calculations 0 $0 400 Construction Drawin•s 6 20 60 60 16 80 80 322 $25,800 500 Technical S•ecifications 4 8 32 32 6 I 82 $6,810 600 Front End Documents 4 4 24 24 8 64 $5,208 700 En•ineer's Cost Estimate 2 4 8 8 2 24 $2,034 800 Permittin• 2 6 12 12 4 36 $2,988 900 Biddin• 2 8 12 12 8 42 $3,384 MAN-HOUR TOTAL 32 0 74 184 192 24 96 88 40 40 40 28 838 $68,028 • • Princi.al Enrineer E-3 32 hours Illn.III $114 •er hour= $3 648 Pnntin• $1 000 Senior Proect Mane.er E-2 0 hours �C� $105 •er hour= $0 Su••lies&Misc. Pro ect Mane.er E-1 74 hours ��! $96 •er hour= $7 104 Com•uter Senior Pro ect En r ineer/Sury: or P-5 224 hours MIN $87 •er hour= $19 488 Trans•ortation Project Engineer/Surve or P-4 192 hours Ell EMI $78 •er hour= $14,976 Senior En.ineer/Surveyor P-3 40 hoursC $69 per hour= $2,760 DIRE T EXPENSES s 1 000 En.(neer/Surve •r P-2 hours $60 •er hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $51 •er hour= CAD Mana.er E-1 24 hours IllrjMll $96 •er hour= $2 304 Engineering Expenses= $41,736 Senior Pro ect Technician T-5 96 hours MIMI $78 •er hour= $7 488 Drafting Expenses= $15,864 Pro ect Technician T4 128 hours alralli $69 •=r hour= $8 832 Surveying Expenses= $9,000 Senior Technician T-3 hours @ $60 •:r hour=- Administrativeses Technician T-2 hours ® $51 •erhour= Expert = $1,428 Associate Technician TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES $68,028 T-1 hours �� $42 •=r hour= WANE 28 ours ® $51 •er our=MEM • HOURLY TOTAL= 838 TOTAL LABOR= $68 028 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS a I ;69,0281 0:1PU8UICWorkN11e120011Y00101 Water Wore Projects P•oposollEngll7s.klvunto,y-AMENDED CE.M411.2.47 WM ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 - CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. AMENDED 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-3 CONTRACT B.1 -WELLS NO.3 AND 4 TREATMENT FACILITY WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL s r ,, r r• .'ea J °;3L Y t.-1,...',J,,.....,. .,..11:,,,25f.'. i r. , r, ,�Y ?? -c�..M ,+..•i:c.'<:a>w�.p�r�..s r � ein5� a�. ;t Y:Il..i v.21'r'.'�tibut+ia+c1':as�b�r�.t;���.:Ut•A'.w`:Ss;'rS.�Y?C,:,d44`igru „+ � :i -1,;c'..'•!‘,,',,',,,::t � ti?::'� ..rod� �a prs're�t,i. ^:„s. _ ��- � x t• .;y. a - .i -.ir ., ..-." z+u macr;...r,, ',,g44 ,�.'v:s. •++ a' a5'S.ry.: .r.,. .tea" i �:.: da rn 2�, ;IY-�J, , .,*:°xt�`a.`.}R",..�„j.. „� ,',, b,,.}.- ,d •' a� '0, n -r' '4 - t k.'. ';,:-- P :� ...v.� .: �.�. :: 1.7,4 .:ia i.+ ,15i..,,... �. � �t •��;a yy„„ P � ..,+... � .:._ ..�, ..,� ..a.., .!'',.-"-.,,.,-.,..,,,;-,w-,,.'240,1:_,,,,,: .: . .. {,.. 'u �. .. ;,,���yy".k� u�� ,it• 3r• '4i�:e•� t � :.;� 3 ��°'r �� ".i �a f'?.� :rs C 7 U- i1.�w .,..,y .� :,; '�, , � :3s, N,:.xsa�i^�.rU <.,.kir0i� ,;t:,.;C...ttk ���f"e�... 4 ..-v. yi�r,.l,x ,. '' y ., b'. .,.}.� .. r ” 5 r +St, ,w�a.. .t �'ti n :V r�. .., :S �. `,:Y # - 'r' r 91 -.344,,,,!:.;,-4-3.5344= �"A �t�.r�`s s � � ,,� a• s:A4 „,x1,:.,,,7.ri` `;',:-i1 ,.,"r dItp ��in�p .'+.ea.,rv,^ FtpRetiEdd.°�.r 7 a :.;'S�r ..�.,,". v ,t,i.,7 .;:t4, :•Si...y A''.2,'4,, n:i .. i.8r..;-!. e.' ae •s.. C, ,., 'C12. a.�.t? 4,'.`A`, 't,',e°. s,: s:� t,. .,,,a ,y.. .�7`sj``. ,, 7, FY° r,K:. E ... �..�.#tea..Y a at � •�':, . � �- '"a:4-'k'.4"` - � c� v�MAN/Is: `ENCi1T�!k� �� 11NAtiEf�_;xTECHQI�?i �,';t'EGHN.,23.. UtS�!®,.,. iT�Yj/' T$LH14U,�: ............. � ...��,` #i ,• :...,e. x�< •�'.__s�3 .,•nom>r� ',�u. ... :. ._ �.,a.- ._..�.... _...__ ..� ,M 100 Project Meetings 20 20 20 20 80 $7,980 200 Surveying 8 8 8 4 40 8 8 8 92 $7,944 300 Design Calculations 10 8 40 40 98 $9,096 400 Construction Drawings 20 20 120 120 20 150 150 600 $51,570 500 Technical Specifications 20 20 80 80 12 212 $19.284 600 Front End Documents 8 8 20 20 12 68 $6,000 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 8 8 20 20 56 $5,316 800 Permitting 8 4 12 20 8 52 $4,620 900 Bidding 12 12 40 40 8 112 $10,200 MAN-HOUR TOTAL. 106 0 108 360 368 24 190 150 8 8 8 40 1370 $122,010 Princi.:I E ,ineer E-3 106 hours $120 •er hour= $12 720 Printin a $3 000 Senior Pro ect Mane.er E-2 0 hours 1111111MI $111 •er hour= $0 Su••lies&Misc. Pro ectMana'er E-1 108 hours OM. $102 •erhour= $11016 Com.uter Senior Pro act En.Ineer/Surve or P-5 368 hours MIMI $93 •er hour= $34 224 Trans•.rtation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 368 hours Q $84 per hour= $30,912 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 8 hours Q $75 •er hour= $600 IMIIIIMIs11NXMid/aa-']..'£3 3000 En.ineer/Surve or P-2 hours 11111171 $66 •er hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $57 per hour=_ CAD Mane.er E-1 24 hoursC� $102 .er hour= $2 448 Engineering Expenses= $88,128 Senior Pro act Technician T-5 190 hours MIMI $84 •er hour= $15 960 Drafting Expenses= $29,658 Pro act Technician T-4 158 hours WM $75 •er hour= $11 850 Surveying Expenses= $1,944 Senior Technician T-3 hours @ $66 per hour=- Administrative Expenses= $2,280 Technician T-2 hours 111111n1111 $57 per hour=- TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $122,010 Associate Technician T-1 hoursC� $48 •er hour= ecreta A-3 40 hours C $57 •erhour= 2,280 HOURLY TOTAL= 1370 TOTAL LABOR= $122 010 ( TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS- I $126,0101 G:SPUBUCWorkvllie120011Y00101 Water Worcs Projects ProposanEngt(ee inventory•AMENDED CE..dsjB.1.384 TF ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/031 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. • 1121/03 ATTACHMENT B-4 CONTRACT B.2-STATE STREET FINISHED WATER MAIN WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,IL • 1.. jn t� S;Y, 1 �r t w�, 1v,.-.,a.-.Sa.•,r�Js�ia.`.n.s: 'L,t� �4,1 -7'i t "i?�7. +:+3..'eLn3u`�ls:f,�'.cr��i'�.�.,udt$ .,e 1 -i e iY,4+ ° .' .t_�. -.t .44.411,41141114..104;411 � � :.,. S � �.':_ l.p'v� n �-..�-.,snT;, •. c T^. ., o:,:y�.. ...,`.,,._.. ., .- ��v +1L..tf�,.�.A-f3�a�+rL:3� 1 J.w,s.�� L:�v�L..i'�A+:Si4*,,,,,,„..7_,„,,,,,.„,,,„ ,..,,,,„,.,_,I -!t� � �Y��� .a:..l :`'L3 cd .�a..rg> "':s- .� �F,lr nix•Y ��.o r'as 1. .�4, f�&e.�.,. '"�e':w" t .aa <7. • E 'ti-n fes, �`��,z, -„,Zg.o. C1 w1i:� ��: >�s �:�..:.:Zy � ��a �< t --o- l ;s� -�:�� }• r<r.�” .r .•t�' � .� :.�lr a ,,.1 u'5�2.^v eS .,.� �1s�t ��''N�`���"KKt ,�.,a,,. .� k, a -1:'. i� ���"'�v�. '•r o:' .$.. -R , ,�;s �41 i. .1' @ - — :C,;�:1 {.. �+ A mow.,i� f�s�y�i.a .. 1/'w§" n.,<.:5+'2' moi. rL. ar '�' - 3 i.�. ...1 yr . g .a. }. ..:,v.,k.. a.. f -:st y .i i d M z. . .,4 .:�?,. 1 S."`: r3� }.;�?Y' at ,. dims...� .. n'. - .c:.q: gyp.-.a,. s -...V'� '- '.7.r ..7',• :."i' „. , �....• � j P,�, r',. s' �'`.=xr; .t& a;� ,Sr;, ,�: � �� asf:ts N'..f ..d.S. ^���.`�. •I �`Na a ex j�a :. a . -aR;., t�q^: :n.- a. ,"®..��"{fx jy �` .. .>.. ..a.,.,.1�¢C... �: �V,? .. '- .. at`' ni. �� �.{ n'�{f s�x:ia � �L � .' q _ �. .:,.pj_ a,."'`1/..h a�.z., ��s�,�����4. °#S 1. �;� : z.e.v h... -.iti. . n _ ." �� ,k ����"c',hit :. j ,;�'S�'Zy�+�+� `c'{.�.;� �i:. �n . ..a1'. ;.�,?Te� :1�y �•t. z „��l 7a)�r��� _s,,,� "ei�: ® it a� '4. :4 '::4 SIN ,i,.. im,c-, ' `N ERIe, ...:� d:,,°�`,.. i'i 1,, A ER FI "a ,} ..', ,.l 'a- ( ti r� Vx., Y, epi kt elk Ak iia §id�.�a....c•'ir 100 Pro'ect Meetin•s 4 8 10 10 32 $3,066 200 4 8 12 4 8 4 20 20 20 100 $8,400 300 Desi•n Calculations 0 $0 400 Construction Drawin.s 4 8 30 30 8 40 40 160 $13,782 500 Technical S•ecifications 1 4 16 16 6 43 $3,702 600 Front End Documents 1 2 12 12 8 35 $2,904 700 En•ineer's Cost Estimate 1 2 4 4 2 13 $1,146 800 Permittin. 1 4 6 6 4 21 $1,818 900 Biddin. 1 4 6 6 8 25 $2,046 • MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 13 0 36 92 96 12 48 44 20 20 20 28 429 $36,864 Princi•al En,ineer E-3 13 hours MM. $120 •:r hour= $1 560 Printin, $1 000 Senior Pro ect Mans.er E-2 0 hours �e� $111 •:r hour is $0 • Su••Ties&Misc. Pro ect Man:!er E-1 36 hours �� $102 •=r hour= $3 872 Com.uter S= • P •6•,,r.i•IILL.-Aran.'r-iAMONIM P-5 112 hours 1111n11 $93 .,r hour= $10418 Trans.ortation Pro— En!(neer/Surve or P-4 98 hours a $84 .er hour= $8,084 Senior Engineer/Sury or P-3 20 hours ® $75 .er hour= $1,500 DIRE EXP SES En!sneer/Surve or P-2 hours MIME $66 .,r hour= Associate En!lneer/Surv- or P-1 hours ® $57 .er hour=— CAD Mana!er E-1 12 hours r� $102 •,r hour= $1 224 Engineering Expenses= $21,852 Senior Pro'ect Technician T-5 48 hours Erliiil $84 •er hour= $4 032 Drafting Expenses= $8,558 Pro ect Technician T-4 64 hours WWI $75 .er hour= $4 800 Surveying Expenses= $4,860 Senior Technician T-3 hours © $66 •er hour=— Administrative Expenses= $1,598 Technician T-2 hours 0 $57 •er hour=— TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $38,864'' Associate Technician T-1 hours WI. $48 •er hour=_ Secreta MMAININOWAINNna. © -Initill 'er our= 1, 96 HOURLY TOTAL- 429 TOTAL LABOR= $38 884 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= I $37,8641 0:1PUBLICtYorkvllleI20011Y00101 Water Wore Projects RuposalEng!fee inventory-AMENDED CE.dfi6.2-5S WM ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-5 CONTRACT B.3-WELLS NO.3 AND 4 RAW WATER MAIN&KING ST. FINISHED W.M. WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY,IL -�. -.a „��y '� d '.t xae.iat._Ca.e: .5.. A...i.:lin..r6.4....,.,1:b4S.ES:35s'o'a�...sk.-Ht+a.::i.•..t.1ax,:�f.:: 'iib�aW,s6325,r+ wMIWLI�Jv:Nto ..vX,l.��`i1a 3 w.�...1, .,=. aJ,,..:. i-..� ,:' ''..2,,,':.-1,,,.�F 3.3� ,.,,‘,41::,;;;:,,;,,g.',.-.6:',.; '��4 ' ..'Rti$��1 + �i�i�\'�!•.•. .:. ... ,; � ..� .. ..;� I::.t :�L F. �:3•..., •,�' .'O`P.. �' 1'r._" r \. t:..R'i e,y r.,t 'U+"<`�"'7F�.. ? r a .x. "r+R 77'4 i'0.0#3141,,'., � '.r,. '$• § s..t fr 4 s .�xr. •�. t., N.s, ,..h., :VIVO c "r r,�7 - ,'^.:+:v, i.Y t a .,.J.F.y, •'�i4, �: �! '' , tom•, '1i - 1 I! %� ,9•, t.� y*. 1 r, s' +, .f?K .:Rei ,s`Ot'. .?'�e . � A§';-'41s,.-t, �., C,i.. . ..�:..: '... ;, r• 7h' ��-• ,5 v�. < S!v� .0 [n ..)x�.x. 's., ,+T�.' ,a,, b j.'11.71 le In„- tee :.:.,.-� '- .w. 3 , .- ,: e 11 i k;. 'i?r,� .t�:, t 4. - r`^'u'n'i'. l'-' ' - l a 4!4 {( P Y. 0`3 ®. Y:', n T! an , x � .KY-4 ' ;;, J ,�t<.>,� 4,.7 ':';'141.444,1:1; }} ,�a`r-'�. � 1 ,�. �1+ �. ��'' ,;�� ,4 ,R�. � aq�� .{p��9 ��1 �.•- }.,,=q {' � ,� ,t ,._� ,k,.. ..:;- .t.Y u..'t , .. � .5�'?. ..<, �'v. x. ..., . .,. -hxr-����" s� i n�•..L'k� t�+an,�. r �. r, .r .'�:k?, ,...KY-47 � � +i'.. t3 .:_�f, t.. 3yr,1 dg nu. ,L s f q . .;-_'' :l v.. :-,„ '-.a R" .E.OIl. ... 'i r,""'i.. .L y ' ;3..;••: up Y7u t.e � is {� [.Y �s q4.•o,Kl�rAi :.�.. 5�-E-•�M •= E+ 1..NJ1�R^ �(i1t��t:Ri*jai � ri':I�ANY1QERi•�`F`l7�Ct'li'utt y}fE= f�� 1jU�` �" i �1lQRr e'-``"1''�CEN�I# a rx`S-f.` *. .,y'��.. ,,, gl:"�3 100 Project Meetings 16 20 24 24 84 $8,208 200 Surveying 10 20 30 12 24 12 40 65 65 278 $23,010 300 Design Calculations 0 $0 400 Construction Drawings 8 40 120 120 12 100 100 500 $43,404 500 Technical Specifications 4 20 60 60 32 176 $14,964 600 Front End Documents 4 6 24 24 20 78 $6,480 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 4 6 12 12 8 42 $3,672 800 Permitting 4 10 16 16 8 54 $4,788 900 Bidding 4 12 16 16 12 60 $5,220 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 44 0 124 292 302 24 124 112 40 65 65 80 1272 $109,746 Princi•alEn!ineer E-3 44 hours r' $120 •erhour= $5280 Printin• $1 000 Senior Pro'ect Mana•er E-2 0 hours WIN $111 •er hour= $0 Su••lies&Misc. Pro ect Man=•er E-1 124 hours MIMI $102 •erhour= $12648 Com•uter v •111,,L AJaLat011111111111111 P-5 332 hours 11M11111 $93 •er hour= $30 876 Trans•ortation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 302 hours @ $84 per hour= $25,368 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 65 hours @ $75 per hour= $4,875 �aIl luE 1000 En a ineer/Surve or P-2 hours �@ $66 •er hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours 11111Mill $57 per hour=_ CAD Mane•er E-1 24 hoursC $102 •er hour= $2 448 Engineering Expenses= $70,452 Senior Pro ect Technician T-5 124 hours Wri. $84 •er hour= $10 416 Drafting Expenses= $21,264 Pro ect Technician T-4 177 hours MIME $75 •er hour= $13 275 Surveying Expenses= $13,470 Senior Technician T-3 hours ® $66 per hour=— Administrative Expenses= $4,560 Technician T-2 hours @ $57 per hour=— TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES- ;109,746 Associate Technician T-1 hourse1 $48 •-r hour= ecretary `M. 80 hours IlljinllIllEUAMI per our= 4, 60 HOURLY TOTAL= 1272 TOTAL LABOR= $109 748 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS- I $110,7461 G:1PUBLIC\Yorkvllleg2001\Y00101 Water Works Projects PropoWlErpgtree Inventory-AMENDED CEsisje.3-Raw WM ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-6 CONTRACT B.4-WELL NO.6 WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS • CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL .1.. E S, .V s - vx3a..v.a_: ...I,...,Av,.td,:.,:'s;;,:,l ,,43-7. .�aysh-'-'-m_,,.,,--'- '',4—!a:.'..�. ; k�` e F .' Y f r v 'C=c, F lr�.,1 L 7 ¢ r ,y 1 k>,�?-'n u.� �A•na k, t 'a`' ails } r,�T^..^5"(. �'=7r?_ p„ +,^r i w.+• 1.,�,>t br^ wie4= -it'&N a, t .t., eb ;','2-`1" '".'4;. ..'=-.-• L �;.f' x?i �_,. �-.. t } I. k 1 .,.::., 4,�, ;ta^�•x.r', ,.•„�,. -., r^a h:. >� �I�j i'�a-• � 3-.e' � . - I r .vel s •ti a £E_, ':7_'S .f. t...lyra" d ^Cy -ytea ..TMd" v^i S4.,,,. - F : , 1� 1. tv{. ,.L. �,. .at ..t Is i�dti� ,�, E . :�*, 6. VA r � �n ;� r `.'aR,� ac xlt� rF.- :[ � � ��„ � 3 k, "-,'ii: W k' rr.t.,. >i" ..� �' �� «'`'�,- � � .I I;R"i r 11 f._.,+i_ rt � t. ,o�a ,... � S <c v "�, ti r�_. � ,p, ,;�� �.:tv I �'.S-? ""t' a� ; �, r^.�'. ':a� ,� ,�< z n r k'�� :�7 s y �. 3 45w$: n�i s . k, + tw t,., n i r „ >r;- i.. :J.�A. .�,.. ,„V, zr. .� .F 5t' -v.� -a -c, a. r. ®, ,-s ,l3 p is .,L; �� �v51.� .�-k��Iva,.,,,.ani � �T, �u.- - ms Ll.•. ��'v `�::i'-. -s a � �.'t�h � $ I, �o- »---"eT� K �f ter`. ,.��'"!': w , .��qq aD o- „`°tb� .�. v lb`s ?t•,a ...`a' :.'' a. 1 A:' .� m71; i; <- ci f.,^,r, � Ma.� ..} ` .n,:v k.41,., 3' s i ,:.F- ,f3 t'..1 1e) .; 'I�itN �I :-FM'. -0a- >& TA*.' <ey>,f �, ,r �i ,,,A. { �`.^ � rZ ... t,.i..I'�U 'Xo wi.�,e.e u e+.,iS.aV�maj �i � �rY _, i ,"1`,.,. t. 100 Pro'ect Meetin.s 8 10 12 30 $3,096 200 MgIIIMIIIIIIIII 4 8 4 8 12 6 6 48 $4,248 300 Desi•n Calculations 2 4 8 14 $1,392 400 Construction Drawin.s 2 12 12 4 16 16 62 $5,532 500 Technical S•ecifications 4 12 40 24 80 $6,792 600 Front End Documents 4 8 12 16 40 $3,324 • 700 En.ineer's Cost Estimate 2 2 6 6 16 $1,344 800 Permittin. 2 4 8 6 20 $1,734 900 Biddin. 2 8 12 8 30 $2,628 MAN-HOUR TOTAL. 26 0 64 118 0 8 24 16 12 6 6 60 340 $30,090 Prince -1E •ineer E-3 26 hours IIKMII I $120 •=r hour= $3 120 Printin• •$500 Senior Pro ect Mane.er E-2 0 hours Mr= $111 .er hour= $0 Su..lies&Misc. Pro ect Mane!er E-1 64 hours IMPIEN $102 •=r hour= $6 528 Corn•uter S- P •C: ia•l.r=.»c.i'ii vi. P-5 130 hours MillinIMI $93 .er hour= $12 090 Trans••nation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 0 hours @ $84 per hour= $0 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 6 hours @ $75 .er hour= $450 DIREC EXPENSES= 500 En•sneer/Surve or P-2 -. hours OMNI $66 •er hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours CI $57 •er hour=_ CAD Mana•er E-1 8 hours C• $102 •er hour= $816 Engineering Expenses= $20,622 Senior Pro ect Technician T-5 24 hours WU. $84 ..r hour= $2 016 Drafting Expenses= $4,032 Pro'ect Technician T-4 22 hours MIN $75 •=r hour= $1 650 Surveying Expenses= $2,016 Senior Technician T-3 hours $66 •,r hour=- Administrative Expenses= $3,420 Technician 1-2 hours ® $57 per hour=- TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $30,090 Associate Technician T-1 hours $48 •er hour= so-eta MEM. 60 ours 1111M111111.11tal. .er our= 3,420 HOURLY TOTAL= 340 TOTAL LABOR= $30 090 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= I $30,5901 o:1PU6uclYorkWsel2oo11Yoo1o1 Water Works Projects Propos.11En Inventory-AMENDED CExds18.4- 11 No.6 • ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1121/03 ATTACHMENT B-7 CONTRACT B.5-WELL NO. 6 WELL HOUSE AND TREATMENT FACILITY WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL .,.;, ',.,',',,,,,..',,",;:;;;227:-'..`.* Nc j' --- 'a1 x ,r:L. }.:',.s' 4 : 1 ,,. ,j n I ::n!! i,.:•,., ��..�,4� '+ .v� no::_.,: �sai�e+.[;n ry..�: �s.�.yy.+ ta'!'�ecv3ainLY.�u:br14t3hrxaday�niYe_? IGrs< axx..6uSmL:+ 16w1s'�ErS��'G .i�`u'.:b< t �a�.,,,.w ^-a „ it�a�.et3a'm,..�;k ,✓ . J � :`_ ,,, :44 .y?\.. �L „c,. 4 .4 .n 1S - �,n.:..,.�...2 � �? yryr (,, T' . "1. ;5a ..�.., ,� .�, .t ,r,. � .ar. n )< .. al+b. :3� .�' "a• �,� ""s4� c ?.n'� f, �v:'ah�w �' � # ,��, an:. d�.y. � .i� ,_.y.. :\ .1�,'t}� j vu :a ..[' t'j1 PW .,,c,... 4 :1t..'r" t YH ,Yc. � 7tw�e F. r,L I :.n. a 7,"z.�"r:. c 1".:.,`.0..t. .l< .t. �?+.� ,'T}A.�.,vqy. !, tl11�..�6(n. .� , :tr. , & R ? � (•�,� ,�' �v`. � tf�4 ., .f..t'\. ?, �, §o .., au. s ,. �',. r,0.}�_.�'., A1?IN�H ,p J':il='. F. �[Y��{F yr•,:� �N� (<" n e.<[" ,:'. �''"�p�?,... }-Yf�TT 1 ::: R'y.. . `'.� `.`, :ti u ,Y; .,.�. . . . ., ,r Ag: i..'4.,Sr!r •.t-V'ta�4 >`-,(ne,. :.rice i 1. d1 K'".,�R 1- �\,<, . i,, .1. -..�t � 117: f •dL. sed a•• ;.�#S`.�o:� �# � Gk �-^,tai. a, .t.,:R.bJ�µ � �'�... �G ° Ic,,T,*���le ;^f! ,,yyyr 4 �6y ✓d :.n3`Err'kd �h .3,•. � ..::..''r• ,�,.;,., •n ,y+ar. k::• ?1�„$K. ,h =h: 1, r' tYk^' -,Cl §�`}� u<,�me;,e q.,..t :'�t. .11" �,i-, .�13 ^:F'; ,?�".a: u.,:.K n. IC :. r -r'.'-' "' c' y,.. r a .,1 a ¢t,, 5�,, �' M�A�1�t��1N'td�Ne�R .-:�,INET; ''{A�ANA�� ' ZSH �!i.� 1R a ,1t�yr�y 't�C.Net a .-,p,,,,,,,,,,,„,•_,,,„.. x u .. k�. 100 Project Meetings 20 20 20 20 80 $7,980 200 Surveying 8 8 8 4 40 8 8 8 92 $7,944 300 Design Calculations 10 12 40 40 102 $9,504 400 Construction Drawings 20 24 120 120 20 140 140 584 $50,388 500 Technical Specifications 20 24 100 100 12 256 $23,232 600 Front End Documents 8 12 20 20 12 72 $6,408 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 8 12 24 24 68 $6,432 800 Permitting 8 4 12 20 8 52 $4,620 900 Bidding 12 12 40 40 8 112 $10,200 MAN-HOUR TOTAL. 106 0 128 384 392 24 180 140 8 8 8 40 1418 $126,708 Princi.alEnrineer E-3 106 hours t' $120 .er hour= $12720 Printin. $3000 SeniorProectMana.er E-2 0 hours Illall. $111 .er hour= $0 Su"lies 8,Misc. Pro ect Mane r er E-1 128 hours �C' $102 .er hour= $13 056 Com•uter Senior Pro ect En,(neer/Surve or P-5 392 hours MIN $93 .er hour= $36 456 Trans.•rtation Project Engineer/Surve or P-4 392 hours @ $84 •er hour= $32,928 — Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 8 hours @ $75 per hour= $600 DIRECT EXPENSES.. 3000 En,ineer/Surve or P-2 hours Mr= $66 .er hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours ® $57 per hour= CAD Mans.er E-1 24 hours MIMI $102 .er hour= $2,448 Engineering Expenses= $94,416 Senior Pro'ect Technician T-5 180 hours INFIE $84 •er hour= $15 120 Drafting Expenses= $28,068 Pro'ect Technician T-4 148 hours SEMI $75 .er hour= $11 100 Surveying Expenses= $1,944 Senior Technician T-3 hours ® $66 per hour=— Administrative Expenses= $2,280 Technician T-2 hours WANE $57 per hour=— TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES- $126,708 Associate Technician T-1 hoursC� $48 .er hour= ecretary A-3 40 ours @ ELME .er our= 2,280 HOURLY TOTAL= 1418 TOTAL LABOR= $126,708 ( TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS- ;129,7081 O:\PUBLIC1Yorktlle\20011YO0101 Water Works Projects PropoaafEngij(N Inventory•AMENDED CE.iejB.5.8 WH&TF • I ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-8 CONTRACT B.6-WELL NO.6 LIFT STATION AND FORCE MAIN • WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY, IL s efi { L .,4rc'a�.. 9 `:°a3 .:>.,‘‘,',ii,',,,,,',:.:,‘,,,'_,::' -1,',:', e� y �_.>xx.y.,.».a^.l,i .,„w.. .....s 4hr J ', al,aa:ukn31-ij6tUu; �;.va k:mi�.rx.ar' 4 x•.;.,s:.,.,��I�.:s.� vl. r-.... �»ti # :;; a e a E . .:. 4,‘'::::: 0*-;.',;q'�ir '.44 , , . ,e+t�.�: e . � 7ynW3arC . <vVA.„,• ” -a r '`.4;,121.44 - �11 � af1 .%.„.,:..7",' tr71 @ f � i'1 '" � 'lr � '' ` ,.F v . I '. � j�;�'': �'U� �� [41:11=1X'41� � b44i �::4*, �p �¢ tg:; �n •✓,�:cRh:�yt4ni :',.‘1:;F-41-"-.1:..'''';!- fs�b i�' e"a.^; S ��mr,.0.ini ` 3v.,giu 100 Pro•ect Meetin•s 8 12 16 36 $3,672 200 IEENIIIIIIIIIIII 4 8 4 8 12 6 6 48 $4,248 300 Desi•n Calculations 2 4 8 14 $1,392 400 Construction Drawin•s 2 12 40 40 4 20 20 138 $12,132 500 Technical S•ecifications 4 12 30 30 24 100 $8,382 600 Front End Documents 4 8 6 8 16 44 $3,624 700 En•ineer's Cost Estimate 2 2 6 6 6 22 $1,848 800 Permittin• 2 4 8 8 6 28 $2,406 900 Biddin• 2 8 8 8 8 34 $2,928 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 26 0 66 132 100 8 28 20 12 6 6 60 464 $40,632 Prins•al En.inset E-3 26 hours @ $120 •-r hour a $3120 Printin c $500 Senior Pro ect Mana a er E-2 0 hoursi $111 •er hour= Pro ect Mena c er E-1 66 hours = $0 Com lies r Misc.1111.741111 $102$102 •er hour $6 732 Com•uter - i• P •L-At i rlir[- 1Lr1.9-,LAIIIIIIIIIII P-5 144 hours MEMO $93 •erhour= $13 392 Trans.ortation Pro ect Engineer/Surv= or P-4 100 hours illiC� $84 per hour= $8,400 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 6 hours IIMMIN $75 per hour= $450 DIRE T PENSES: 00 En!Ineer/Surve or P-2 hours M11.11 $66 •er hour= Associate Enc ineer/Surve or P-1 hours ® $57 •er hour= CAD Mane.er E-1 8 hours M' $102 •:r hour= $818 Engineering Expenses= $30,528 Senior Pro ect Technician 1-5 28 hours 111171111111 $84 •:r hour= $2 352 Drafting Expenses= $4,668 Pro'ect Technician T-4 28 hoursCy I $75 •=r hour= $1 950 Surveying Expenses= $2,016 Senior Technician T-3 hours ® $66 •=r hour=- Administrative Expenses= $3,420 Technician T-2 hours Minilli $57 per hour=- TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES IN $40,632 Associate Technician T-1 - hours MM $48 •-r hours. ecretary `a= 60 ours MA' •-r our= ,420 • HOURLY TOTAL= 464 TOTAL LABOR• $40 632 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= I ;41,1321 0:1PUBLICWorkvllle12001\Y00101 Vater Wake Projects Propose8Enpljree Inventory-AMENDED CE—Idsje.se LS&FM • ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-9 CONTRACT C.1 -SOUTH WATER STORAGE TANK WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,IL k , ,-.: lf,' \� \. ..i... {� Cir 7,7- SL� .��t� 6 S. :'�..: Yr'.i` r.,y �,ill::.,t ry t.f i��'R 3.� � v Y lil 1 ,.:: �.r� i 'i' t fit, J.i �.' 1z yti dy;i' N1 4-y.. a '...Y-S.,,,U9 ...Si:-'..U.vier''''' Fslr m PAC,' A�i8 3.ud 4 t 7,TC�t.YasyNt,,' •-,,.,; WMJ�•ih.s-- .w-,,�1�{4..+I:.ut J�':C . wA.< '=7 ,t4 ,,,I.L J. �, p -�.. `t¢.tF',t �ti,�y,,..3N'2 S? ix1. - a:,-‘-',=--.,:.-' ...: : .n,., Rr:.,,.,.., wra; ..T fd°H7»3 - �. � r.,'' _.< � rig.._• �' ,. ,WV.,;',-.0a.!4,,.44%,!9-i,'',.' �a'i,;::.•.i t y��.h� 1�',..0:,,,:;":,' ��i�a' .. :�';. :a'; . ,+� ,�.,,?�'TS.. :,r, ��i_:....41, l•N �1 .ti p �/� - .� 1 't '*k,r ,y w '93z -t. • n.tr.e. .'9 .,.. 4;,:,, :3'(l..'�.'..1r :.,..-.4,,,,,,,,,*,,,,. 1d.; 1;1 _} „., T� 77, t,..-. fl hk .ka.oeop..v r.. 1,,,r-15.:„ ...,,,,,i+,.37;. .;X q S..s¢ .t,a1. � + k •,.� tf, a :.r,hr; - i ..� it, �,,,t . ��',� i- si - �.et 4t',, a(GAt)' �+'.p .F - 't rtf�J t�' ;,'YD,'.� - O�1-oa J � a a ak¢ '. -,,N4...,'4 IIRM t �a , � `�,... �a*�� .:,,,. ..K_11. ..FP �+'.+(s`�Tt. M1S.f+."..,`k..' Y+.`rSri”} 1 i `�, , v. n d4`aa�"� sva etw �sv,:zy? "a c .Etat::•" aAG8R3 :`,coEK4.' � E OII�EER :MA'�IAbtfs P�`,'TE 'N 'rt H!L "�v a,,,,-,-.1„0..4HN�s "'trof.S' -- r '""�, , +"rL,': 100 Project Meetings 16 32 40 40 128 $12,264 200 Surveying 8 12 8 8 16 16 16 16 100 $8,652 300 Design Calculations 8 12 60 60 140 $12,804 400 Construction Drawings 4 8 60 60 8 40 40 220 $19,092 500 Technical Specifications 4 12 32 32 24 104 $8,736 600 Front End Documents 4 2 8 8 12 34 $2,784 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 2 2 6 8 6 24 $2,016 800 Permitting 2 6 12 12 6 38 $3,318 900 Bidding 2 8 12 12 6 40 $3,522 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 42 0 90 242 240 16 56 40 16 16 16 54 828 I $73,188 1. Prind•al En.ineer E-3 42 hours $120 •,r hour= $5 040 Printin• $1 000 Senior Pro ect Mana.er E-2 IIMEIM hoursr[t •,r hour= $0 Su••lies&Misc. Pro ect Mana.er E-1 90 hours WINN $102 • rhour= $9 180 Com•uter S, • P • —L.,J{3u,•iirt-.arf.n.c-ruiIIIIIIIIM P-5 258 hours 1111F1.1 $93 •:rhour= $23994 Trans•ortation Project Engineer/Surve or P-4 240 hours ® $84 •:r hour= $20,160 — Senior En.Ineer/Surve or P-3 16 hours MIMI $75 •:r hour= $1,200 'ifT-.i-13.7J4ar3*13 1 000 En•/neer/Surve or P-2 hours I ® $68 •-r hour= 'ssodate En•Ineer/Surve or P-1 hours �E� $57 •er hour= CAD Mana.er E-1 16 hours c' $102 •er hour= $1 832 Engineering Expenses= $56,888 Senior Pro ect Technician T-5 58 hours MIME $84 •er hour= $4 704 Drafting Expenses= $9,336 Proect Technician T-4 56 hours 111M11.1 $75 •:r hour= $4 200 Surveying Expenses= $3,888 Senior echnician T-3 hours @ $68 •er hour=— Administrative Expenses= $3,078 Technician T-2 hours © $57 •-r hour=_ TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES- $73,188 Associate Technician T-1 hourst $48 •=r hour= ecreta MraMi ]•MIKZENEMINI______ ITZER '7__ HOURLY TOTAL= 828 TOTAL LABOR= $73 188 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS-I $74,1881 0:1PUBUC\Yorlcvmet20011Y00101 Water Works Projects ProposaltEre es inventory-AMENDED CEAsjC.1S Tank ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, E FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-10 CONTRACT C.2-MILL AND VAN EMMON STREET FINISHED WATER MAIN WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY, IL � \fin: . ; .. � .,...,,,,,,i,.:., F... ... \ � ^i7{"�C(Y�]1r pC{. r:, t..,'.. wn. �•. 5.., r.1.9 �.-� :a I • _� � k �..,k p,,7 4,,r,y -, .q -,,,C j c..'L, ..l.,- kkw.''- ...,.ad�F.e',-,' `-' k�,.,,dku>Sa..-,leaw ;.,au.....144 ' rz�e9.'i<t.t cJ i: .i,,,- .,r--7,m.�.,,,&.,., i.-e 1.;.2 ik 4,_.,,.+a k a :-N.w. '�,�' .4 n4 s*t 1,,t? '® •c47 a 5 ,.1 ,s,'.d: .C`-'a ct_ 4 v. . ,�q�ir. -�i..:,:� -i14.. �t. •,� �,;• >'�� � �. ..fir-:, � a .,.il ��y s: .c a:s .s t�.1,, r nrg, �'�3+ � 4_:,_' .fA,r. - ,.{g.s! ,... .n�. a.:s,�L{ ,, i.:,;.�. ..,,-„ a. „-�•, x�;R'` }r, nti a:k'IV ,i *e, a,, 33..�..'� $,• t: a, a num 0 ;,� ® aa . ;� o.l 1S. b,%; Ptia. /f P• ^. . �++fes ,,Y,, t f - ” `jr,,,_ x. �.i. '-�. �..,t""S :.-.':� .� Y [1. -*).•. .\ .. .� - �4 .: :'.i1". F„ ��1.,, x'91, +iL.. ��'S�,➢.�A_..cs. �Ye11 ) �_ s.'L v't?•C' `. ;y > X u',-4+14i4141 s ;' °,.s:. .-'. c • .t • +, _ ..�",44 •,='4._.r, r.'! t,. ��„ ..}1` , ;r.,;t.4lxx�:" ;,;4. •'. ta E h ...A._ %1_EFI'ma g:EllBII .''+�aNA�i@}Z7 �# .t,'+'IEN S 4 u�46n s 11<-: r ¢ a u�: u 100 Pro'ect Meetin.s 4 12 16 16 48 $4,536 200 Surve in. 4 8 12 4 8 4 20 20 20 100 $8,400 300 Desi.n Calculations 0 $0 400 Construction Drawn•s 4 12 60 60 8 60 60 264 $22,680 500 Technical S.ecifications 1 4 30 30 6 71 $6,180 600 Front End Documents 1 2 12 12 8 35 $2,904 700 En.ineer's Cost Estimate 1 2 12 12 2 29 $2,562 800 Permittin. 1 4 8 8 4 25 $2,172 900 Biddin. 1 4 10 10 8 33 $2,754 MAN-HOUR TOTAL 13 0 44 156 160 12 68 64 20 20 20 28 605 $52,188 Princi.al En.ineer E-3 13 hours Mi. $120 .er hour= $1,560 Printin• $1 000 Senior Pro sot Mana.er E-2 0 hours $111 •er hour= $0 Su.•lies&Misc. Pro ect Man=•er E-1 44 hours MM. $102 •er hour= $4 488 Com•uter Senior Pro ect En•ineer/Surve or P-5 176 hours . $93 •er hour= $16 368 Trans•.rtation Project En.ineer/Surve or P-4 160 hours EIM.Mil $84 per hour= $13,440 — Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 20 hours Cr $75 •er hour= $1,500 DI• C EXPENSES= 1 000 En.ineer/Surve or P-2 hoursc• $66 •er hour=_ • Associate En.ineer/Surveyor P-1 hours (`CI $57 per hour= CAD Mena.er E-1 12 hours ® $102 .er hour= $1 224 Engineering Expenses= $33,996 Senior Pro ect Technician T-5 68 hours IIMIMII $84 •er hour= $5 712 Drafting Expenses= $11,736 Pro'ect Technician T-4 84 hours MIMI $75 •er hour= $6 300 Surveying Expenses= $4,860 Senior Technician T-3 hours 1111Mil $66 per hour=— Administrative Expenses= $1,596 Technician T-2 hours 111111E.11 $57 •er hour=_ TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $52,188 Associate Technician T-1 hours IMMIll $48 .er hour= Secreta NIMEME 28 oursEms' .er our= 1, 96 HOURLY TOTAL- 605 TOTAL LABOR= $52 188 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS= 1 $53,1881 OAPUBUC1Yorkell te2o01wo0101 Water Works Projects Proposal1Fi area Inventory-AMENDED CE.ndsjC2.M11VMA ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-11 CONTRACT C.3-LIBERTY STREET FINISHED WATER MAIN WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL • • �. "'",r,'''''''''' ''''':::rtr _X..'' .,,.a.r.t]r..,> .v12i.4oro+ui.t.;."':lnlvkaanye" Itt:'^Far4 (u .:ladf:rn Arw 36r h.i.I u.. v. {z,.•.. .,,,.,:W.,::, .7 r k4Z,4,. .S ty! eti,, smv i fit r::t� r rm.t r14% ',,..,' ,t; p� - , "rpt sy d.rK.. s� ..''K-.�s - -`ry . , ,,:,. - .,: °�t'sr Y .z. tl '"r •,y3,, .t 1, -T; !..1,.t'. 3Vn.• ,3,. .'c4! low' ��77t•".< -'. r:�'r ?,. *.• � x_. `-rnr•. °fi,5 s. ,: ; 1T ,9,. .,"Y �Y. h . i . $'� ... ih v!�`,':?:.,�'�s :S"�4d'kN �+,,�,,�& �:}�.,�`•S� ti`:1. "I'!1 -.�'; e � � .t�t y,� '1 � 4, , 0;"fit e t �Y `t"'�r}: n!�u �'t� ."''', =';'7'e i': 1 �a , . .; ., . . .. ;«, .s -..1. •:.td . ... ..r..t. .> . �.r�. .� �: ,.µyew •�p. ,,�, 1�-5�'{"����W :rr.� '� t .4 �yH€ � , owtx t ud .,firy ". $ ..,..,. . ; . e,1^,, . 1, . ee atr a. -'t :-.2,:•e1 rf. rEC r. • r ,,•�. , >:tr .__�. Na';•' a• � �: ! n�:;t'���". $::. ^{ �i �•�..� 7 e - !`kANIS � �. 1s�NCiI�E��R' ,t��fNLff ':;MAN'l�E'RTlGF11L;, N �`x t p;s� .� r. . �'�. ._,.: .7,�... . ..... ..... :...., � :4 ._.,....Q .. N ,. � �- . A .., � ,... . ,���t,' ON: ._. ,'I-xQft�3TECt�t,_ _ .�..... '�""... I�. :r:a.t,. _ g 100 Project Meetings 4 6 8 8 26 $2,508 200 Surveying 4 8 8 4 8 4 20 20 20 96 $8,064 300 Design Calculations 0 $0 400 Construction Drawings 4 8 30 30 8 40 40 160 $13,782 500 Technical Specifications 1 4 16 16 6 43 $3,702 600 Front End Documents 1 2 12 12 8 35 $2,904 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 1 2 4 4 2 13 $1,146 800 Permitting 1 4 6 6 4 21 $1,818 900 Bidding 1 4 6 6 8 25 $2,046 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 13 0 34 90 90 12 48 44 20 20 20 28 419 $35,970 • Princi.alEn.ineer E-3 13 hours 11111R11. $120 .erhour= $1 560 Printin• $1 000 Senior Pro'ect Mana•er E-2 0 hoursc $111 •er hour= $0 Su•.lies&Misc. Pro ect Mane•er E-1 34 hours Illrill $102 .er hour= $3 468 Com.uter [-.K .ce ,•:. •=L1i P-5 110 hours 1110r1.11 $93 .er hour= $10 230 Trans..rtation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 90 hours ® $84 per hour= $7,560 Senior Engineer/Surve or P-3 20 hours 0 $75 •erhour= $1,500 �Ulax'i a.g..169 .. 1 000 En.sneer/Surve or P-2 hours IM11.11 $66 •‘r hour= Associate En.ineer/Surveyor P-1 hours ® $57 •sr hour= CAD Mans.er E-1 12 hours 1111F1111 $102 •er hour= $1 224 Engineering Expenses.= $20,958 Senior Pro ect Technician T-5 48 hours EMI $84 .:r hour= $4,032 Drafting Expenses= $8,556 Pro ect Technician T-4 64 hours EMI $75 .er hour= $4 800 Surveying Expenses= $4,860 Senior Technician T-3 hours 1111M1111 $66 per hour=— Administrative Expenses= $1,596 Technician T-2 hours IIII r $57 .:r hour=— TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES- $35,970 Associate Technician T-1 hours Mr= $48 •:r hour= ecretary IIIIMMIIM' ours `C11111E11' per our= 1,59. HOURLY TOTAL= 419 TOTAL LABOR= $35 970 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS• $36,9701 0:WUBLIC\Yorkville42001\Y00101 Water Works Projects Propo..rEnpl(r..Inventory-AMENDED CE-ldgc.3-Lany MA ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03+ CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-12 CONTRACT C.4-SOUTH BP/PRV STATION WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL . L" ` ..?,..� 4 �;� w �+>y.'S�r.w�r...�l.1.. L's n:<.•....�. a.k -•`_.5o`.k..-3-..:5•1.5h,S.Pa7,�Wt�af..SX,hi te{'- e, aaG,u3. Er 1.bbd. s;.a<.ial'Yar,.l�., a�ivv.iem&tiTs...i :w'F'A. ` _;„d,•..•, -,t� ,,u. ' Y z r„„,:w ✓.x ,., ,J ,;.1 ' > r r : bS ' lv' tv;+ ,a, t7, � , � erM. ., ^+r1 ca,� x? s1 `-" xu - 4Fk. 4 'L ^ rru k � �^ir tr 4r l',',`;;,,,-4,10S; Y Tk' 1i . ay �.§ u�L,< r� r* 6t � fa e� e :v2-:,p, f l • ..`Irghilii;,7044\Yii i`- Ci1 "=. P«� 1 ��,eZ � ; 5fzvi.; � F`titpY <Z= _ t,%4 \� MP rr 7.44-w,t � nk.' i4,64”'' , �ht, . NQ ' r% . } , i.-, r +�.�.. -,ar ,,,,11-4,..]c,--.,'...,,,,,,,w,W : L 411 `a'>aai*`4:34 F 'Iit.'.ia ' i , ti,e __ 1 • rE W as. .-1 3s . ., T, C, rrg 100 Pro'ect Meetin.s 4 6 8 8 26 $2,508 200 4 8 8 4 8 4 4 8 8 56 $4,776 300 Desi.n Calculations 0 $0 400 Construction Drawin•s 4 8 30 30 8 40 40 160 $13,782 500 Technical S•ecifications 1 4 20 20 6 51 $4,410 600 Front End Documents 1 2 12 12 8 35 $2,904 700 En•ineer's Cost Estimate 1 2 4 4 2 13 $1,146 800 Permittin. 1 4 6 6 4 21 $1,818 900 Biddin. 1 4 6 6 8 Y8 $2,046 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 13 0 34 94 94 12 48 44 4 8 8 28 387 $33,390 Princi•al Engineer E-3 13 hours $120 •erhour= $1 560 Printim $1 000 Senior Pro ect Man-•er E-2 0 hours WI. $111 •er hour= $0 Su••lies&Misc. �Pjr�o��'�e��c�t M,e�na•er E-1 34 hours c+ $102 •=r hour= $3 468 Com•uter CL- LIAR. ' •iia-.ad;:ti•1.7aL•illIMINIM P-5 98 hours MIME $93 •=r hour= $9 114 Trans•.rtation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 94 hours @ $84 •=r hour= $7,896 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 8 hours @ $75 per hour= $600 DIRECT EXPENSE = 1 000 En•sneer/Surve or P-2 hours WM $66 •=r hour= Associate En•ineer/Surveyor P-1 hours @ $57 •=r hour=- CAD Mans.er E-1 12 hoursC� El $102 •=r hour= $1 224 Engineering Expenses= $21,666 Senior Pro ect Technician T-5 48 hours Wall $84 •=r hour= $4 032 Drafting Expenses= $8,556 Pro'ect Technician T-4 52 hours NMI $75 •=r hour= $3 900 Surveying Expenses= $1,572 Senior Technician T-3 hours C+ $66 per hour=- Administrative Expenses= $1,596 Technician T-2 hours •@ $57 •=r hour I.- TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $33,390 Associate Technician T-1 hours WWI $48 •er hour= Secretary A-3 28 ours mgaimmiza. per hour= 1, 96 HOURLY TOTAL= 387 TOTAL LABOR= $33 390 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS=1 ;34,3901 O:IPUBUCWorkvlile\2001\Y00101 Water Works Projects ProposallE area Inventory-AMENDED CE.xt]C.4-South BP-PRV ' ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL 1(21/03 ATTACHMENT B-13 CONTRACT C.5-SOUTH PRV STATION WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL I . ,.,....?.; .�? .+!..• +. : Y" .w4i. ,� kt }c.y _:„L'—_,,‘-'‘,,..,,,,,,, ":`-'—'..:. . >y: im-..Jx.t..1, j-..... .1 �dsra:...;.!t.,l.s.5....�.+; w�.: ut.,.�f.a,•f,,1.,s5. irteaJt. 5`at7.•Itir a t. j. s.e':n, 1 1ts �...:�r ',.4104);P ..` I.f.. 4 ?rY4 :,'2,77,7.7.T-77.1i74-S.1 ..a ,t.x�, � .�rRp. .+�g• 5�.��x: Tt t CL ]�`1RBd ROI:',.,'• ]utV' l �o4- r *i�i •tet_- �&, .s3a�. � i s t t lm 4r .o' . � � kI , * r�# .�N.v 5Y ry .'4a,;11-0 Ms'?.�8J•' kya„. .,•:amp(>..�` a .e4 H •o� fa ��ca6 ''a µµ- yti �d Solpy.N „ �1 'I )ter if;:.,. + g . .. , \ L?islt ,,vx . /�li_ � � ���t�l, �2 a„ .- rG. . INEEaR, ,LN 0INfER .tM R "''�<TEbHr ,wf._H46'..!".47P-'1..A'!1,;:.-::e40 '0 o,, �� i" lv,, ili , , 100 Pro ect Meetin•s 1 2 2 2 7 $678 200 Surve in. 2 2 2 1 2 2 4 8 8 31 $2,550 300 Desi•n Calculations 0 $0 400 Construction Drawin•s 1 2 10 10 2 10 10 45 $3,888 500 Technical S.ecifications 1 2 8 8 2 21 $1,854 600 Front End Documents 1 1 2 2 2 8 $690 700 En.ineer's Cost Estimate 1 1 2 2 6 $576 800 Permittin• 1 1 2 2 2 8 $690 900 Biddin• 1 1 4 4 2 12 $1,044 MAN-HOUR TOTAL 7 0 12 32 32 3 12 12 4 8 8 8 138 $11,970 1 r+n Princi.a1En.ineer E-3 7 hours lininlill $120 •-r hour= $840 Printin. $1 000 Senior Pro ect Mana a er E-2 0 hours $111 •er hour= $0 Su••lies 8.Misc. Pro ect Mane•er E-1 12 hours WI. $102 •erhour= $1224 Com auter Senior Pro ect E •ineer/Surve or P-5 36 hours ® $93 •er hour= $3 348 Trans.ortation Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 32 hours MIME $84 per hour= $2,688 Senior Engineer/Surve or P-3 8 hours ® $75 .:r hour= $600 '1l 4 bi 2C 1 000 En a ineer/Surve or P-2 hours 11Mr1111 $66 •:r hour= Associate Engineer/Surve or P-1 hours @ $57 •:r hour= CAD Mena•er E-1 3 hours 11111rMI $102 •er hour= $306 Engineering Expenses= $7,728 Senior Pro ect Technician T-5 12 hours WIN $84 •=r hour= $1 008 Drafting Expenses= . $2,214 Pro ect Technician T-4 20 hours EMI $75 •:r hour= $1 500 Surveying Expenses= $1,572 Senior Technician T-3 hours © $68 per hour=— Administrative Expenses= $456 Technician T-2 hours @ $57 per hour=_ TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES- $11,9T0 Associate Technician T-1 hoursL• $48 •er hour= ecretary A-3 " ours 11119111111.11M11 •er our= 456 HOURLY TOTAL= 138 TOTAL LABOR= $11,970 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS- $12,9701 0:\PUBLIC\YorkvIlle\2001\Y00101 Water Works Projects Propossll&noVoe inventory-AMENDED CE4s]C.S-South PRV r ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1117/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: •MIF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-14 CONTRACT C.6-WELL NO.7 WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY, IL :...S N;'''':''' ':._ ''' _. :w`F� sI. ,,. L1i r .. a. . : ( f �,° i ,, - �����):1,+` `3 { ':7ax� tc�Z,..,.t,:n ` .r Fsa >„+ „z.4.n. ldM.\•.�k[`.a...::.a..,.txsmual�:aarsm uassMrt7wi•&t�,�v.ut ..w.,>Brew.mt,esSAe.L...esvnaas.t• Git".hw.ma ?. ..wl>ah.,.�?•id u;�F.sx 7. .: .:r : Six ra?,u'� yne"*�. �L �"{ is ..51! t n ,..ra?Git, ^`Y� y .� ,- 3r � 4 cafi, ! e,- i• <,,.,a .p 5.,.,:. i ,,z,,t T,,,'t. ,, . ,_e : •s• ,t yj<,�'."�,. 1,&"' -..1, i. `.;- r., �c ?c;,:.,,#.44. : .f- I , x..-r ..� l } r �" ,<;t.. Y ... �, _ v r to _<::;`�•�� .• v's :,. x:z. "'4' R-'� l',.`. u~� �.. #' .�c&. rre e{`i :F':3 :�- .•g17tN1/44gM..r4jei,,tf-C,t4n.� �F^.�+ „h ;.'$- � :: •'. Lt. di 1 '� . 3. �f G iiru s.°=7. }:l�e{•.- a 't .,19., o� :•....,+ v- � `� ;,r � � t p 7 f ,. f �3' �:a.t�" '�. , >. `a > �-;� .:�-�����ygg �,.i .Wt• ��.. �. .a. ����� il a•xn � i ,�;,M. 1�'s a..a��>�. �'l:' ,. v �. rc � . :,....;.•. � ., ,.. „'� ,1�;��.� �e.�` v., a��. r��t-a + _�f.-,'r {..�:.°. ,v . r ' ' - :'. t: �.-,i .S..,,, 4lW. '..3t"a'•r, t' r". " j4 f;c..1. a' ,�qe �i ;�'_ ..1 ,:"Jia� u 4,,V '• ` .r. .. <I.1 .. .` °INfr ' n: d fa 3 I4NAb8R• IN .._U 'ra��t S` INE s ! °>A ° $qua .,+ xt ,. '3 �e. s:= ,..;.,� ,3 100 Pro'ect Meetin•s 8 10 12 30 $3,096 200 Surve in• 4 8 4 8 12 6 6 48 $4,248 300 Desi.n Calculations 2 4 8 14 $1,392 400 Construction Drawin.s 2 12 12 4 16 16 62 $5,532 500 Technical S•ecifications 4 12 40 24 80 $6,792 600 Front End Documents 4 8 12 16 40 $3,324 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 2 2 6 6 16 $1,344 800 Permittin. 2 4 8 6 20 $1.734 900 Biddin• 2 8 12 8 30 $2,628 MAN-HOUR TOTAL 26 0 64 118 0 8 24 16 12 6 6 60 340 $30,090 Prins•al En•ineer E-3 26 hours MAW $120 •-r hour= $3 120 Printin• $500 Senior Pro ect Mane.er E-2 0 hours C $111 •er hour= $0 Su.•lies&Misc. Pro ect Mana•er E-1 64 hours ci $102 •erhour= $6528 Com•uter Senior Pro ect En•ineer/Surve or P-5 130 hours Illc� $93 •er hour= $12 090 Trans••dation - Pro ect Engineer/Surve •r P-4 0 hours @ $84 per hour= $0 Senior Engineer/Surve or P-3 6 hours MEM $75 •er hour= $450 1r]Iax«lg�ad�:6� --f1 500 En.ineer/Surve or . P-2 hoursII c! $66 •er hour= Associate En•ineer/Surveyor P-1 hoursC• $57 per hour= CAD Mana•er . E-1 8 hours =MI $102 •er hour= $816 Engineering Expenses= $20,622 Senior Pro ect Technician T-5 24 hours r:• $84 •er hour= $2 016 Drafting Expenses= $4,032 Pro ect Technician T-4 22 hours C $75 •er hour= $1 650 Surveying Expenses= $2,018 Senior Technician T-3 hours MIUME $66 •er hour=- Administrative Expenses= $3,420 Technician T-2 hours $57 •=r hour= TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES m. $30,090 Associate Technician T-1 hours =7= $48 •er hour= ecreta A-3 6 r ours MUM $57 •er hour= ,420 HOURLY TOTAL= 340 TOTAL LABOR= $30 090 TOTAL.CONTRACT COSTS N. I $30,590 o:1PUBUC1Yorkv ille1z0011Yo01o1 Water Works Projects ProposariEnafee Inventory-AMENDED CE.rdQC.e.Wee No.7 4 e ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-15 CONTRACT C.7-WELL NO.7 WELL HOUSE AND TREATMENT FACILITY WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL �r,e�i , > . i= : 2.r i��. sY.,. is ,_ r. �. a y�y� h..t. ,tt!2 ,e s'... d J 8 am. u e �::, y �� x �:arJy e >r .: 6`f.s.,.. ..K..S,.s.sf.t ..n:.r.,uutAa.l.�..�e..�.r.u�c•,F u�il¢.�.m'�..�,� sun..., ��,sb...,s�i..°1.+�Aa�,.sPL�:d...`U�k�t1�...3�:�' s+...nuc . s5 � �C _..}�p. f �,' � '�aid+ ., • � 1s .;a� �- .: r .. ..,n, k a i=F. �,�,.,..v..,,21,—"551���' q i °` rr :J=2 rC..,� .7:e ,;.r '`p• 79 .,, �p4r , ,0_x,1 a4 ..i ,Q,kt,.F,a,6 t' .{. ' tt . •Y: Hit :n,r ' i h,,. 'ityt ., +�n .ar., ..'. t �, -:at�.m .. >"_ �...%*..�'> .. , �� �,} � }, .,,:it '� .. "7tA v�,-� ,�.p .��' '� v= i �a', 4°54W— .5::;ti. afi �..� �t .., at` - y;. w. ..,..>..v.. z�'4�_ �,3•.< , • .yu.;:1v t sa.1 ,� T �.. ...l fi ,� x ...;� 8 i''-� ».. ,�.:�.�,YK v a• ,r. o .,�_:...„ � � k's � ��r;;�-a o •�:. , 4i- e� s bra d`� �v s if�' s. ,..�. +� � ,z, i 14,444% � atal�Gr,;� � M {Pam"�T� rao�l�+c � , ��-£�:. std •• E � , . .,.�= � a ,::u �.•.r.. .s .. ,.,,.z,• ,, ,ay .. 7 -i.,.. .,, .... ..: . • f, . .z. t .r'�.,ek. -_ okt— i E,„ ue:., ...;w� c:Fi>P.t n r _�sfr: 3b. t•.,,,; d -1 ve �``.'%e `, �?s' Q . ri4, ,� `, :Eor,E tltNEErg "fviANAiir-W 1MECHN ee:,,,b W'�-,'.:Li, ® , -.,*,,,1-4,,, y,. ,,, ,, r':,5 t .,:-,:_i_ `t.,1 0,04#40.'> 100 Project Meetings 20 20 20 20 80 $7,980 200 Surveying 8 8 8 4 40 8 8 8 92 $7,944 300 Design Calculations 10 12 40 40 102 $9,504 400 Construction Drawings 20 24 120 120 20 140 140 584 $50,388 500 Technical Specifications 20 24 100 100 12 256 $23,232 600 Front End Documents 8 12 20 20 12 72 $6,408 700 Engineer's Cost Estimate 8 12 24 24 68 $6,432 800 Permitting 8 4 12 20 8 52 $4,620 900 Bidding 12 12 40 40 8 112 $10,200 MAN-HOUR TOTAL. 106 0 128 384 392 24 180 140 8 8 8 40 1418 $126,708 Princi.al En.'neer E-3 106 hoursr� $120 •=r hour= $12 720 Printin. $3 000 Senior Pro'ect Mane•er E-2 0 hours moram $111 •er hour= $0 Su••lies&Misc. Pro ectMana.er E-1 128:=Y-1C $102 •=rhour= $13056 Com•uter Senior Pro'ect En.ineer/Surve or P-5 392 hours mum $93 •:r hour= $36 456 Trans••rtation Project Engineer/Surve or P-4 392 hours Q $84 •=r hour= $32,928 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 8 hours (Q $75 .er hour= $600 Se]IaXyi3Y»261�1:1 3 000 En,Ineer/Surve or P-2 hours MU= $66 •er hour= Associate Engineer/Surve or P-1 hours IMMO. $57 per hour= CAD Mana•er E-1 24 hoursC� $102 •er hour= $2 448 Engineering Expenses= $94,416 Senior Pro ect Technician T-5 180 hours IIIMM $84 •er hour= $15 120 Drafting Expenses= $28,068 Pro'ect Technician T-4 148 hoursC $75 •er hour= $11 100 Surveying Expenses= $1,944 Senior Technician T-3 hours © $66 per hour= Administrative Expenses= $2,280 Technician T-2 hours C• $57 •:r hour=— TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES= $126,708 Associate Technician T-1 hours E-• $48 •=r hour= ecreta `MN 40 II4MIIG lltall. 2, 80 HOURLY TOTAL= 1418 TOTAL LABOR= $126 708 I TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS=.I $129,7081 a:wueuc\Yorkole 2ooltvoolot Water works Projects ProposaIEn01[tIS Inventory-AMENDED CEsds1C.7-7 WH&TF I • ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PROJECT TRACKING WORKSHEET FOR DATE: 1/17/03 CONSULTING ENGINEERS DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES ENTERED BY: JWF SUGAR GROVE,IL. 1/21/03 ATTACHMENT B-16 CONTRACT D.1 -SCADA SYSTEM INTEGRATION WATER WORKS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF YORVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY, IL a Y',44..... ...,1 a ct 4' La,.,.:,',;->n‘;:‘i :� .&A,,, ,A -w, f,e m',',:i wsd,',�t l}3,i ^vj laloSuk ,a''•'a' +,lbrh s �`� lti ':i Ili i-1s.-.,i. ,�ia,.,:.,..f.'.'�b;Si�Ls ... ,. '.+cw'.a'y+,e3dC.. `,'."�.. .. ., �... ...,..,�.. .. .,T' ..:. .:..... ...�,1• Y. �t 06,41+7,,,4 Y.s�, S" H �' p ��i. � ,< �:� Via. �3a�.� �.t h.5,�^„ Rte".-‘,;',FP :p:' vc: r�3,. �tai,L'T;°' �fi o t N.'%` i7','"'"4"'";7:01:1 .:'''51.';°.--,!.',"j �Fz' .> - :,1,i‘.-:k!,,.3%a, #{ r ti L-,: t. ,-, V',,. ;E i m [ tr11 ,vS 'w S `, 3 >E1U 4.-, Sd ] } ,', ,z. .! •�:-«4 ti,...'y aa�.Vic.� -:... tl, j.n"T ? t`,.11 c. � :.;,. v.�.:,.. .... .�'.` �... �ia k'.,�.v'•� ..�. .�.c� ..+,.0 F G., i }�p ..:.� �-.',%1. � � ti++� C� ..���, r,w...h. ayZ;�t.., � .a, � r-,;.v•-,1t.;,[71‘-',P. � •. --o' e •'w�•�e„y t"� �.,�m77 a ti �F p> Y �S ' �� ,. � �, �a ,.,.a�� � ,, , :z a'aF19�. � •, t: :. -a a . .-. �•':. .. �E����� tt,f,�",, ��,.;, ,., ray 't,�.,{; � Et...'g4.-,': s <s ` `�s �.,e« :.,� ..k�x o��� �'kit��xl, �i.�'• .L�. :j.ry+, �. . , . -�' �i.... ..✓��3�. ry., .,Aa.i. t'+5.'a..-�:... �,�.�=,k�}�h� .�to�Ilii: ', ,... �;;�.a �.y. 'FC�F:.. ,.,; , ,.t�'�, a1: .0t', I i ':'Sa 't ,•lgAll.'k5 ,:', q +r i ie -i c1F1 '+ E`R'.rMANA e I 1 tE. .(�'.H t,.:'e 4' :5i,) l��,L. s x f.. T �::;g e.5 z' ti t° t'r.{,r�' 1rn, *>R�.L4"S.n t fie. .... ten... ,.,F, a ,f ,�,��x,s 7�:�z� �,� iz�_ � �� C3-� .,_ �. �IN� _� v. . - i ..._ �.. zr„�.b�r,�a� ..Jt�.,, . . ns,�.»..r�,�,'�,�.�me� 100 ProectMeetin•s 4 16 24 24 68 $6,360 200 Surve in• 0 $0 300 Desi•n Calculations 0 $0 400 Construction Drawin.s 2 8 40 40 2 30 30 152 $13,110 500 Technical Seecifications 4 8 60 60 8 140 $12,372 600 Front End Documents 2 2 4 4 8 20 $1,608 700 En.ineer's Cost Estimate 2 8 8 8 4 30 $2,700 800 Permittin. 4 4 $228 900 Biddin• 2 4 12 12 8 38 $3,228 MAN-HOUR TOTAL: 16 0 46 148 148 2 30 30 0 0 0 32 452 $39,606 Princi•:I En•ineer E-3 • 16 hours 111111M1111 $120 •er hour= $1 920 Printin a $1 000 Senior Pro ect Mana.er E-2 0 hours WWI $111 •er hour= $0 Su.•lies&Misc. Pro'ectMena•er E-1 46 hours [1 $102 •erhour= $4692 Com.uter Senior Pro act En•sneer/Surve or P-5 148 hours MU $93 •=r hour= $13 764 Trans.•dation Project Engineer/Surve or P-4 148 hours 1.11111EMI $84 •er hour= $12,432 Radio Path Surve $12 000 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 0 hours @ $75 •er hour= $0 .t l:7 Xmi ctl;A•L9,-107 13 000 En•ineerlSurve or P-2 hours lErill. $86 •er hour= Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 hours 1111ffallill $57 •er hour= CAD Mane.er E-1 2 hours 11 WIN $102 •-r hour= $204 Engineering Expenses= $32,808 Senior Pro ect Technician T-5 30 hours EWE. $84 •-r hour= $ 520 Drafting Expenses= $4,974 Pro ect Technician T-4 30 hours MM. $75 •=r hour= $2 250 Surveying Expenses= $0 Senior Technician T-3 hours MIMI $66 per hour=- Administrative Expenses= $1,824 Technician T-2 hours IllUnEll $57 •=r hour=- TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES- $39,606 Associate Technician T-1 hours WIN $48 •=r hour= ecreta A-31111IMEZENNC' M ' per our= ,8 4 HOURLY TOTAL= 452 TOTAL LABOR= $39 606 ( TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS in I $52,6061 O:wUBUCIYorkvWeV001W00101 Water Works Projects PropossltEngt(rse inventory-AMENDED CEJdsJD.1-SCADA s .w : t , 52 Wheeler Road • Sugar Grove, IL 60554 itot TEL: 630/468-9350 FAX: 630/466-9380 www.eelweb.com STANDARD SCHEDULE OF CHARGES EnglnNring January 1, 2003 Ent srprlsoo. Inc. EMPLOYEE DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE Principal Engineer E-3 $120.00 Senior Project Manager E-2 $111.00 Project Manager E-1 $102.00 Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor P-5 $ 93.00 Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 $ 84.00 Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 $ 75.00 Engineer/Surveyor P-2 $ 66.00 Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 $ 57.00 Senior Project Technician T-5 $ 84.00 Project Technician T-4 $ 75.00 Senior Technician T-3 $ 66.00 Technician T-2 $ 57.00 Associate Technician T-1 $ 48.00 Secretary A-3 $ 57.00 VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT AND REPROGRAPHICS Vehicle for Construction Observation VEH $ 10.00 Global Positioning System Equipment GPS $25.00 Scanning ($1.50 per Sheet) SCA N/A Reproduction ($1.50 per Sheet) REP N/A G:\EEI\DOCS\FORMS\GENERAL\STADS0103.DOC Consulting Engin••rs Sp•eiallzing In Civil Enginsseing and L•nd Surveying at, • . Personnel, Positions & Classifications James K.Michels,P.E. E-3 Timothy V.Weidner,E.I. P-4 President Project Engineer Peter G.Wailers,P.E. E-3 Michele L Daly,E.I. P-4 Senior Vice President Project Engineer David R.Burroughs,P.E. E-3 Gregory A.Chambers T-5 Vice President Senior Project Technician(Field) Ronald G.Naylor,P.E. E-2 Steven Gozner,I11 T-5 Senior Project Manager Senior Project Technician(CAD) John T.Whitehouse,P.E.,P.L.S. E-2 David S.Stewart T-5 Senior Project Manager Senior Project Technician(Field) Bradley P.Sanderson,P.E. E-1 William C.Pierson T-4 Project Manager Project Technician(CAD) Jeffrey W.Freeman,P.E. E-1 C.Larry Nolan T-4 Project Manager Project Technician(CAD) Scott A.Swanson E-1 Randall L Long T-4 Computer Aided Drafting& Project Technician(Field) Information Systems Manager Kristopher K.Pung T-4 Timothy P.Farrell,P.E. P-5 Project Technician(CAD) Senior Project Engineer/Environmental Daniel R.Breisch 1-4 George R.Burgess,P.LS. - P-5 Senior Technician(CAD) Senior Project Surveyor Ryan M.Christoffel T-3 Jeremey T.Lay,E.I. P-5 Senior Technician(Field) Senior Project Engineer/Environmental Joshua M.Boatman T-3 Timothy N.Paulson,P.E. P-5 Senior Technician(Field) Senior Project Engineer Thomas A.Ness T-3 Kevin S.Bomstad,P.E. P-5 Senior Technician(Field) Senior Project Engineer Denise M.Migliorini A-3 Andrew R.Deltchman,P.E. P-5 Administrative Assistant Senior Project Engineer/Environmental Denise M.Thelander A-3 Mark G.Scheller,S.I. P-4 Accounting Assistant Project Surveyor Angela R.Ford A-3 Christopher E.Peterson,S.I. P-4 Secretary Project Surveyor Dawn M.Tillman A-3 Jed R.Davis,E.I. P-4 Secretary Project Engineer Nicole A.Morris A-3 Julie A.Morrison,E.I. P-4 Accounting Assistant Project Engineer Bobbi M.Erdmann A-3 Yifang Lu,E.I. P-4 Marketing Director Project Engineer Angela D.McCoy A-3 Darrin P.Schertz P-4 Accounting Assistant Project Engineer East Dundee.Illinois David A.Kamano,E.I. P-4 Project Engineer Mark C.Weber,P.L.S. P-5 Senior Project Surveyor Brian R.Valleskey p-4 Project Hydrologist Robert C.Watts T-5 Senior Project Technician(Field) Jason M.Bauer,E.I. P-4 Project Engineer Brent D.Kell T-5 Senior Project Technician(Field) Travis A.Carroll T-3 Senior Technician(Field) LEGEND: P.E.=Professional Engineer Stacy L Nilsen A-3 P.LS.=Professional Land Surveyor Office Manager E.I.=Engineer intern S.I.=Surveyor Intern E=Executive P=Professional • T=Technical A=Administrative °`'° 11/25/02 ,crw o United City of Yorkville Memo 1% 800 Game Farm Road EST.14 ° _``E 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 $� II. p`' Fax: 630-553-7575 44.e �ti>' Date: November 22, 2004 To: Mayor and Committee Members From: Lisa Pickering CC: Department Heads Subject: Additional Information for Public Works Packet—November 22, 2004 Attached is some additional information for your public works packet for November 22, 2004. Please add this information to your packet to New Business Item#8—Hydrogeology and Water Quality Study For a Potential Development of a Safe Secondary Municipal Water Supply from the Shallow Aquifer Within the Northwest Planning Area. '�•n '% F•fi1':i� dF xi$i!:Y�' y1 0:pY'Y,! .'!i. ; is . • November 19, 2004 Mr.Tony Graff City Administrator United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville,IL 60560 Subject: Proposal to Perform Hydrogeologic Assessment Activities Nelson Landfill,Yorkville CEC Proposal No. 042188 Dear Mr. Graff: Civil&Environmental Consultants,Inc. (CEC)is pleased to provide this proposal to perforin services associated with the planned investigation of the hydrogeology and water quality of the glacial-drift aquifer in the vicinity of Nelson Landfill in Yorkville.,Illinois. CEC will provide services,on behalf of the United City of Yorkville (Yorkville) associated with the tevicw and oversight of work to be performed by the Illinois Water Science Center of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The following paragraphs contain background information of the landfill gathered from historical documents, and discussions of the proposed scope of work, the cost. estimates to complete the scope of work, and schedule. BACKGROUNI) INFORMATION -the Nelson landfill is located within Kendall County, approximately 3 miles north of the City of Yorkville (Yorkville). The 20-acre landfill operated between 1967 and 1977 on a property that was reportedly an abandoned sand and gravel pit. Available historical information reveals that the landfill operators accepted a variety of wastes including mixed municipal, sludge, industrial, and construction debris. The USGS has proposed to complete an investigation to characterize the hydroleology of the glacial- drift aquifer and to identify impacts of waste disposal practices on water quality in the vicinity<:,f the site. The USGS proposal indicated that funding for the investigation was to be provided, in part, by the USGS and the IJiutcd States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA). The objective of the USGS work is to determine the potential for development of the glacial-drift aquifer in the City of Yorkville and northern Kendall County to be a safe source for municipal.water supply. Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. Chicago 3041 Woodcroek Drive Pittsburgh 000/365.2324 Sults 210 f1Y Cincinnati 8001759.5614 ()owners Grovo.Illinois 60515-5417 p ': Columbus 888/590.6808 ?� .} Export 800/009.3810 Phone 630/983.6026 1980': ;;.., Indianapolis 877/740.0749 Fax 830/963.6027 ''1 ' s , t/'' Nashville 000/7832328 Toll Free 677/963.6026 St.Louis 866/250.3679 e-mail chicag0ececinc.corn -- --- 'I Telt�itY; { ,< a' w .r.=.r7:, 1: ' I�lydtogwlogic Assessment Proposal -----• •- ' November 19,2004 Page 2 SCOPE OF 5ER.VICES CEC will complete the following scope of work items (Tasks): • Task 1: Prepare and Submit Grant Applications • Task 2: Review Historical Landfill Water Quality Data • Task 3: Perform Site Visit with USGS Personnel • Task 4: Review Documents Prepared by USGS • Task 5: Perform Surface Water Quality Sampling and Analyses These tasks are described in the following paragraphs. Task 1: Prepare and Submit Grant Applications CEC will prepare and submit the necessary grant applications to the USGS and the USEPA. These applications were presented by Bob Kay during our meeting on November 16. CEC will prepare the applications for review by Yorkville personnel prior to submittal to the respective agencies. Task 2: Review Historical Landfill Water Quality Data • CEC:has obtained landfill related documents from the Kendall County Solid Waste Commission,and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). CEC will review water quality data to determine the parameters and concentrations identified at monitoring wells on site. This in formation will be used to develop the investigation work plans. Task 3: Perform Site Visit with USGS Personnel Cr.0 shall perform a site visit with USGS personnel to assess the conditions of the monitoring wells currently on site. This assessment will establish the need for the wells to be developed, sparked, repaired, etc. USGS personnel will be collecting samples from these wells for analyses as part of the proposed investigation. Task 4: Review Documents Prepared by USGS CEC shall review documents prepared by USGS personnel prior to the start of field activities. These documents include but may not be limited to Field Sampling Plan,Quality Assurance Project Plan,and a Health and Safety Plan. CEC will also review final work products prepared by the USGS on behalf of Yorkville. Comments generated by CEC personnel during this review will be forwarded to the USGS for incorporation into the respective documents. Task 5: Perform Surface Water Quality Sampling and Analyses Water samples will be taken from one location within Rob Roy Creek during a period of low flow. This sample will be collected during the fall/winter of 2004. The data will be used to identify potential impacts to the creek by the landfill,and may be used in the planning of the field activities proposed by the USGS. ped 1101 1liTIN4 AM . 'NI H.ydrugeologic Assessment Proposal - - -- . November 19,2004 Page 3 ESTIMATED COSTS CEC can complete these tasks for the following Not-to-Exceed amount of$12,700. Additional work beyond the scope of services presented in this proposal shall he approved by Yorkville prior to the start of such work. Our schedule of Terms and Conditions,which apply to the proposed work,is attached. Your written authorization to proceed will form a binding contract and indicates your acceptance of our Terms and Conditions and the conditions of this proposal. SCHEDULE CEC can begin work immediately upon receipt of written authorization to proceed. Field activities may begin within one week of authorization to proceed. Authorization may be received by mail or.facsimile at the address and facsimile number provided on the last page of this proposal. Please contact either of the undersigned at (630) 963-6026 if you have any questions regarding this proposal or if you need additional information. Sincerely, Civil&Environ e al Consultants,Inc, Mark 1 Waxali,P.F. Senior Project Manager cc: Joe Wywrot, P.E. AUTHORIZA77ON TO PROCEED; CEC Proposal No. 042188 Signature: Date: Printed Name: Title: Phone Number: Facsimile Number: A MEMO To: Tony Graff Joe Wywrot, P.E. From: Jeffrey W. Freeman, P.E. Enginieraring Entarprisess, Inc_ Date: November 19, 2004 Re: Shallow Well Siting Analysis EEI Job #: Y00224 It should be clear that the City has made excellent progress in expanding the Water Works System to meet, and exceed, the growing water demand throughout the community. Expansion of the Water Works System has been, or currently is being, implemented on all of the system components, namely supply, treatment, distribution, storage, and controls. More specifically, three new deep sandstone wells have been drilled, and corresponding treatment facilities are being constructed, so these new sources of supply can be integrated into the system. With the addition of a treatment facility for the combined treatment of the City's two existing wells, the City will have the ability to utilize five deep sandstone water wells throughout the Water Works System, and have the ability to supply over 7,000,000 gallons of water per day to the City's water consumers. Nevertheless, even with these additions, it also should be clear that the capacity of these water supply improvements will someday be reached, and additional supply and treatment improvements will be required in the future. As you may recall, our firm has continued to work with the City to identify all appropriate sources of potable water supply that could be utilized in the vicinity of Yorkville. While the City currently depends on the deep sandstone groundwater for all of its water supply, another possible component, shallow groundwater, continues to remain as another viable, sustainable alternative. Through our investigations as part of the Water Works System Needs Assessment and Project Plan (July 2000), we identified the good potential for shallow sand and gravel deposits on the north side of the community. The recently released draft Water Resources of Kendall County, Illinois, prepared by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), agrees with that finding. You may also recall that as part of our review of the shallow groundwater, we also conducted an environmental database search. Through this search, the location of the now abandoned Nelson's Landfill was reiterated. Based on further research into the landfill's history, and the potential hydraulic connection of the abandoned landfill to the sand and gravel deposits on the north side of the community, it had appeared that additional hydrogeological review should be conducted within the vicinity of the landfill. Primarily through your facilitation, the City has continued to keep a watchful eye on funding opportunities, especially situations where outside agencies will help fund the work, to further review the groundwater near Nelson's landfill. The recently submitted proposal by the USGS appears to provide this opportunity with a significant amount of federal funding attached. United City of Yorkville November 19, 2004 Page 2 Per your request, we have reviewed the USGS proposal, and we also attended the meeting at City Hall on Tuesday, November 16 where the proposal was discussed in detail. Based on our review of the proposal, and the need for the City to further plan to diversify the source of supply, we highly recommend considering this investment. With this investment, the USGS will conduct field and office research to characterize the hydrogeology in the vicinity of the Nelson's Landfill. In addition, the water quality sampling that they are proposing can also be used to determine if the landfill is affecting the water quality within the shallow sand and gravel deposits in the area. With this information, the City will have a better understanding of whether it is appropriate to further explore the siting of a sand and gravel water well, or multiple sand and gravel water wells within the northern planning area. Acting as your Water Works System planning consultants, we propose to work with the City Council and City Staff to monitor the progress of the USGS investigation. We also will help review the findings of the investigation, and help determine how the results of the study affect the shallow groundwater siting options. As part of our work within this process, we anticipate between 3 — 5 progress/update meetings and then the review and commentary on the final report. We estimate that our time on this project would result in fees between $3,000 - $5,000. As you may recall, we currently are under contract (February 11, 2003 contract with February 19, 2003 Notice To Proceed) with the City for a Shallow Well Siting Program. The fees for this work were proposed to be hourly with a budget estimate of $35,000. We would propose that the February 11, 2003 contract for the Shallow Well Siting Program be amended to include the work for this task. If you have any questions, or comments do not hesitate to contact me. pc: Art Prochaska — Mayor (Fax: 553-7575) Eric Dhuse — Director of Public Works (Fax: 553-4377) Robert R. Holms, Jr., PHD, P.E. — USGS (Fax: (217)344-0082) Bob Kay — USGS (Fax: (815)756-9214) Mark Waxali, P.E. — CEC (Fax: 963-6027) JKM, JTW, TPF, ARD — EEI C'\DOCUME-1\joe\LOCALS-1\Temp\M Graff 62.doc / r II l �`(7-� o United City of Yorkville Memo 0iiiin. Public Works Department ESTIto 1836 800 Game Farm Road .� � Yorkville, Illinois 60560 ob I j1L-, a Telephone: 630-553-4370 t. K tlWl County ktE 1,��r Fax: 630-553-4377 Date: November 15, 2004 To: Joe Besco, Chairman From: Eric Dhuse, Public Works CC: Subject: Salary Survey Joe, Here is the salary survey that the committee had requested. All of the un-highlighted towns were taken from the IML survey. I would like to place this on the November 22nd Public Works agenda for discussion. If you have any comments or questions, let me know. Public Works Director Job Title(s)selected Effective Date Nov-2004 Output Sorted by City County Name(s)selected 'Population Estimates for City Tech data were gathered from http://www.nipc.cog.il.us/munipop03.html#Annual(Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission). As a result, 7,000-8,000 some of these are slightly above the 30,000 population cutoff,or below the 7,000 population cutoff. All City Tech data is calculated per year,therefore monthly data is 8,000-9,000 calculated by dividing by 12. 9,000-10,000 City Tech Data 10,000-15,000 PW Director/Engineer 15,000-20,000 20,000-25,000 25,000-30,000 City Size(s)selected City Name(s)selected -{A'c. "qs'.` -..:'2F,'-."5/4-- E x.ii _ _..... _...�.I .i 11?„ KI` rT r Yw101 .v.. ! ky _,+,..c, k�.s vs ' W t " t ¢ 3.rX1xF 1 ( 1 ; q i '#a Search Results for Public Works Director compared to 5833.33333333333 Barrington I Cook 10,168! 1 •I $6,739.00 $8,433.00I $8,433 00 $8,433.00 45% i 2% !Public Works Director IAdmin Svcs Director 4/1/2004 Batavia,City of 26,328 $6,302.08 $8,689.58; $0.001 $7,495.83 29% 163% I Director of Public Works 10/12/2004 Bethalto _ Madison I 9 4541 1 - $5,471.00 $5,471 00 -6% -5% Public Works Director Mayor 4/1/2004 11 _.. 20 21801{ $6,616.17 $8,931.831 $0.001 Bloomingdale Village of $7,774.00 33% 118% Director of Village Services 7/27/2004 Bourbonnais Kankakee 15,256' 1 - $4 056 00) $4,056.00 30% 53% Public Works Director Village Administrator&Mayor 4/1/2004 Burr Ridge DuPage 10,408 1 $5 831.58 _ $8,582.501, $7,732.67] $7,732.67 )--_ 33% _ 4% _ 4 Works/Engmeerin Village Administrator 4/1/2004 Cary McHenry 16,899. 1 l $5,921.001 $7,031.00 $6,998.00 $6,998.00 20% 69% ;Public Works Director City Manager - 4/1/2004 Channahon Will 7,344) 1 -i $6,341.001 $6,341 00 9% ` -27% Public Works Director Village Administrator_ 1/1/2004 Charleston Coles 21 1491 11 $5,833 331 $5,833 33 . . 0% I_ 111% _'Public Works Director 'City Manager _ 4/1/2004 Chatham Sangamon 8,586 1 1 -1 $4,620 001 $4,620.00 -21% -14% Public Works Director .Mayor _ _ _ 4/1/20043 Chicago Ridge Cook 14,1271 1 1 $5,466.001 $5,466.00 -6% 41% Public Works Director ; Village President _4/1/2004 Clarendon Hills Village of 8,235 I $5,515.921 $7,446.331 $0 001 $6,481.13 11% -18% 1Public Works Director _ _ 10/16/2003 Deerfield Lake 18,4201 1_ A 870Ac_18,565.00 $9 537.00 _$9,53700 63% 84% Director -___Village Manager _ - 4/1/2004 East Dundee,Villageof 3,1471 $4,833.331 $5,833.331 $5,572 671 $5,572.67 -4% -69% ,Director of Public Works 8/20/2003 East Peoria i Tazewell 22,6381 1 $5,666.001 $6A15.001 $6,309.001 $6,309.00 8% 126% I Public Works Director City Administrator 4/1/2004 Edwardsville Madison 21,491r 1 $5'824.001 $6,049.001 $5,788.00 $5,788.00 1/ 115% Public Works Director City Administrator 5/1/2004 Flossmoor Cook 9,3011 1 I $6,034.001 $7,542.00I $7,542 001 $7,542.00 29% � -7% iPublic Works Director Village Manager 6/1/20041 Frankfort Will 10,3911 1 $4,000.00; $5,667.001 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 -14% 4% 1 Public Works Director ,Village Administrator 4/1/2004 Geneva Kane 19,5151 1 $5,533.001 $8,006.001 $8,691001 $8691.00 49% 95% iPublic Works Director !City Administrator _ 4!1/2004 Glencoe Village of 8,869 $7,103.081 $9,756.58 $9,666.671 $9,666.67 66% -11% J Director of Public Works 6/17/2004 Grayslake,Village of 21,287 $5 383.67 $7,267.83 _$0 001 $6,325.75 8% 113% Director of Public Works 8/6/2004 Gurnee Village of 30,396 $6,818.83 $9,137.83 $0.00 $7,978.33 37% 204% {Director of Public Works 5/26/2004 Highland Madison 8,438 1 $4,744 00 $4,744 00 1 19/ $6179.00 $9 169.00 -16% Public Works Director 73 City Manager 4/1l2004t Hinsdale DuPage 17,34 ,_. 1 E _$8,305 00 ,$8,305 00 42%_ _ / DirectorNillage Erx}ineer Village Manager _ 4/1/2004 Huntley,Village of 11,769 $4,941.581 $6,970.58, $6,970.58 $6,970.58 { 19% 18% 1,Director of Public Works 2/20/2004 4/1/2004 LaGrange Cook 15,608 1 $6,248.001 $8,100.00 $7,293.00) $7,293.00 25% 56% Public Works Director Village Manager LaGrange Park Cook 13,295, 1 1 $4,831.831 $7,366.00, $6,580.331 $6,580.33 13% 33% ;Public Works Director Village Manager I 4 4/1/200 o Lake Forest,City of 20,7621 - -1 $9,700.00 $9,700.00 . 66% 108% Director of Public Works1VillageAdministrator 7/7/2004' Lake in the Hills McHenry 23,1521 1 $5,987.001 $8,267.00 $7,546.00 $7,546.00 ! 29% 132% .Director of Public Works 4/1/2004 Lincolnshire,Village of 6,398i $6,684.83 $9,050.001 1 $9,050.001 $9,050.00 1 55%- 36% Director of Public Works 2/3/2004 Lincolnwood Village of _ 12,255 $5,166.99 $7,365.64 $6,983 501 $6,983.50 20% 23% 1 Director of Public Works 1 6/2/2004 Lisle,Village of 21,6561 $6,139.751 $8,598.171 $8,313.42 $8,313.42 1 43% 117% Director of Public Works 7/8/2004 Lockport Will 1 18,656; 1 $4,583.00 $6,187.00 $5,981.001 $5,981.00 3% 87% Public Works Director Administrator 5/1/20044 Loves Park Winnebago 20044_ 1 t —__—__--- ----- .._.$4,167.00 $5 333.001 $5,000 00 $5,000.00 14% 100% Director Mayor _ 4/1/20041 __— �..-4/1/2004 Mattoon Coles 18,291, 1 $5,250.001 $6,166.671 $5,416.671 $5,416.67 -7% 83% Public Works Director City Administrator rt 4/1/2004 McHenry McHenry 21,501i 1 $5,867.00 $7,694.001, $6,082 001 $6,082.00 i. 4% ! 115%_ !Public Works Director _ City Administrator 4/1/2004 Montgom> —__ Kane 7 1091 1 $5 347 00 $7 277.001 $6,632 00 $6,632 00 14% -29% ±Pubhc Works Director Village Manager 4/1/2004 Morton Grove,Village of 22,705{ -1 $7 553 33 $7,553.33 . _ 29/ j_ 127% !Director of Public Works 1/13/2004 Mundelein,Village of 32,2514 $6,371.921 $9,061.501 $9,061.50 j $9,061.50 55% 223% [Director of Public Works 9/3/2004 New Lenox Will 17,7711 1 - $6,987.001 $6,987.00 20% 78% Public Works Director _Villa,g_e Administrator 4/1/2004 Niles Village of 29,945;1 -1 1 -1 $8,730.23 $8,730 23 j 50% r 199% 4 Director of Public Works 5/11/2004 North Aurora Kane 10,5851 1 I 1 _ $6,130001 $6,13000 ( 5/ I 6% .Public Works SuperitendentVillage Administrator 4/1/2004 Northbrook,Village of 34,061 1 - I $9,684 50 $9,684.50 /( 66 241V. 1 Director of Public Works 10/7/2004 O'Fallon St Clair 21,910 1 } $5542.00 $7,499.001 $0001 $6,520.50 1 12/ 119/ Engineering City Administrator 1/1/2004 Park Forest Cook 23,462 1 $5,771 00, $7 599.00 $6 934 00 $6,934 00 19/ 135/ Public Works Director ,Villa_e Manager 4/1/2004 Plano,City of j $5,416.67 F $6 666.67 i $6 250.00 f $6,250.00 7% -100% tDirector of Public Works 10/6/2004 River Forest Cook 1 11,6351 1 -1 $7,584.001 $7,584.00 30% 16% 1 Public Works Director Village Administrator 4/1/2004 Rochelle Ogle 9,424 1 1 -1 1 $5,458.001 $5,458.00 -6% ! 6% Public Works Director City Manager 4/1/2004 Round Lake Beach Lake 25,859 1 $5,307.001 $5,307.00 -9% 159% !Public Works Director Villa e Admin 4/1/2004 Salem __ Marion79091 $4,167.001 $5,208.001 $4,719.00! $4,719.00 ]- -19% ,_i I Inspector City Manager 5/1/2004 Shorewood Will 10,003 1 -! $5,208.001 $5,208.00 11/ 0% 4Public Works Superintendent Village Administrator 4/1/2004 Silvis Rock Island 7,269 1 $5,747.00 $8,692.001 $ 097.00 $6097.O0 I 5% 27% 'Director/Administration Mayor&Council 4/1/2004 South Chicago Heights Villa a of 3 960 - 1 $3,750.00 $3,750.00 -36% -60% Director of Public Works 6/12/2003 SouM Elgin,Village $0.001 $6,963.13 19% 102% t Director of Public Works 6/27/2003 St.Charles,City of LaSalle 32,1901 1 $7,147.751 $$0,211 p7l $4,807.001 $4,807.00 -18% 42% Public Works Director City Manager 4/1/2004 y 1 $0.001 $8,679.41 49% 220% 'Director of Public Works 6/7/2004 Swansea SL Clair 10,5631 1 -I 1 $4,439.00 $4,439.00 ! -24% 6% 'Public Works Director Board of Trustees 4/1/2004 $camore,Cityof - 11,500 $6,250.001 $6,250.00 $6,250.00 7% 15% !Public Works Director 7/1/2004 Villa Park !l.1. DuPa e 22,0751 1 I $5 416.001 1 $8,252.00 $8,252.00 i 41% 121% 1 Director of Public Works Village Manager 4/1/2004 g Westem S• Cook 12493 1 1 $8,125_001. $6,292.00_16,292.00 I'I 8% 25% !Municipal Services Director Villa.a Manager 6/1/2004 Westmont,Village of 24639 $6,354.25' $8,896.00f $0 00 $7,625 13 31% 146% Duector of Public Works 9/8/2004 Wilmette,Village of 27266 1 $6 500.00 $9,416 671 $9,125.00 $9,125.00 56/ 173% Director of Public Works 3/12/2004 Winnetka,Village of 12386 - $9,498.00 $9,498.00 1 63% 24% Director of Public Works - ~ 5/4/2004 Woodridge,Village of 33695 $6,682.00 $9,093.07 $9,093.07 $9,093.07I 56/ 237% Director of Public Works 6/25/2004 Yorkville Kendall i 10 000 1 { $4,741.67 $6,138.331., $5,833.33 $5,833.33 1 Public Works Director City Administrator 4/1/20041 Un-aged Averalg_e 1 . L • I $6,886.06, _.- --- -- - C ) UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE "JULIE" LOCATOR JOB DESCRIPTION Department: Public Works Report to: Department Head Status: Full-time Positions Description overview: This individual will be responsible for locating all City utilities in the field as requested by the Joint Utility Locating Information for Excavators (JULIE, Inc.). This individual will mark these utilities in a timely and accurate manner. Candidates should have the ability to handle multiple tasks and interact with both citizens and developers. In addition, this individual will stay infoinaed and current of all JULIE requirements as it applies to municipal utilities. Other duties may be required as prescribed by the Department Head. Basic Requirements—Knowledge, Skills and Abilities 1. The ability to prioritize utility locates and tasks 2. The ability to read and interpret City utility locations as shown on maps and Engineering plans 3. Capable of using AutoCad/GIS software to deteimine utility locations 4. Possess good communication skills 5. The ability to perform physical labor 6. Capable of working outdoors during all types of weather conditions 7. Must possess a valid driver's license Minimum and Preferred Experience and Education 1. Minimum of High School Diploma 2. Must successfully complete a background investigation with findings of good character and no felony convictions I Smith Engineering Consultants, Inc. Civil/Structural Engineers and Surveyors z_. µt.. November 10, 2004 Mr. Tony Graff City Administrator United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Re: 2004 General Consultations City of Yorkville Job No. YORK-040606-7 Dear Mr. Graff: Enclosed is our Authorization to Proceed detailing the scope of services you have requested. We are able to schedule these services to you immediately upon receipt of this signed Authorization. For your information, this Contract will be utilized to account for services requested by the City of Yorkville on an "on-call" basis (i.e.; various meeting attendance, minor service requests, etc.). These services will be unrelated to other Contracts we currently have with the City and will be completed only at the request of the City. To expedite this procedure, you may fax us the signed document at 630.553.7646. If you have any questions regarding services, please call me at 630.553.7560. We look forward to serving you. Sincerely, SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. ame '. -. . .•/P.E Vice President JFH/jmk Enclosure cc: Joe Wywrot, City of Yorkville Y:\Jobs\Smith\2004\040606 Yorkville 2004 General Consultations\administration\contract\040606 Work Order crf 081704.doc 759 John Street,Yorkville,IL 60560 www smithengineering.corn Telephone 630.553.7560 Fax 630.553.7646 rSmith Engineering Consultants, Inc. I . Civil/Structural Engineers and Surveyors AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED To: SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. Job No.: YORK-040606-7 Date: November 10, 2004 Due Date: Work Ordered By: Company United City of Yorkville Contact Mr. Tony Graff Title City Administrator Address 800 Game Farm Road City/State/Zip Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Phone/Fax 630.553.4350 / 630.553.7575 Project Name: City of Yorkville 2004 General Consultations Description of Work: General Consultations for the City of Yorkville on an as needed basis. To be renewed in 2005 as required. County: Kendall Township: Section: Township: Range: Principal: James F. Hoving Project Manager: Camie R. Ferrier Project Surveyor: CONTRACT AMOUNT: Z Cost Plus(or hourly)-Time&Material ❑ Outside Services Included ❑ Cost Plus to a Maximum-Time&Material Not to Exceed E Reimbursables Included ❑ Fixed Fee or Lump Sum 0 Prepayment Required for Work to Begin 0 COPY TO: Z SEC Accounting 0 Z Laura Welter 0 0 0 759 John Street,Yorkville,IL 60560 www.smithengineering.com Telephone 630.553.7560 Fax 630.553.7646 Mr. Tony Graff City Administrator ==f: United City of Yorkville 2004 General Consultations Job No. YORK-040606-7 August 17, 2004 Revised November 10, 2004 Page 2 All claims, disputes or controversies arising out of, or in relation to the interpretation, application or enforcement of the AGREEMENT shall be decided through the Kane County Mediation System. The parties further agree that the CLI bNT shall require, as a condition for participation in the project and their AGREEMENT to perfoun labor or services, that all Contractor, Subcontractors and Material Persons, whose portion of work amounts to five thousand dollars (S5,000.00) or more and their insurers and sureties shall agree to this procedure. The CL11tNT agrees, to the fullest extent peunitted by law, to limit the liability of SEC and its subconsultants to the CL11FNT for any and all claims, losses, costs, damages of any nature whatsoever or claims expenses from any cause or causes, including attorneys' fees and costs and expert witness fees and costs, so that the total aggregate liability of SEC and its subconsultants to all those named shall not exceed SEC's total fee for services rendered on this project, whichever is greater. It is intended that this limitation apply to any and all liability or cause of action however alleged or arising, unless otherwise prohibited by law. All invoices shall be paid within 30 days of the invoice date. Should CLI1~NT fail to pay for professional services hereunder, as billed within 45 days of such billing, SEC shall be excused from rendering any further services under this project. No work shall be signed or sealed until payment in full is received. Additionally, all outstanding invoices must be paid in full before Final Plats of Subdivision shall be submitted for recording or record drawings are submitted to municipalities for final approval. SEC is hereby authorized to proceed with the above described work. NO WORK WILL BEGIN UNTIL WE HAVE THIS SIGNED WORK ORDER AUTHORIZING US TO PROCEED. Thank you. Print Name: Title: Company: Signature Date