The URL can be used to link to this page

Economic Development Packet 08-18-05 4.0cry Colk United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road EST. 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 G Telephone: 630-553-4350 �9 L 1 Fax: 630-553-7575 <LE ‘‘'‘' AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, August 18, 2005 7:00 p.m. City Hall Conference Room 1. Approval/Correction of Minutes: July 21, 2005 2. Building Permit Report for June 2005 and July 2005 3. Northwest Comprehensive Plan Amendment— Plan Commission Recommended Alternative #1 4. PC 2005-35 Bristol Bay Units 1-7 — Final Plat 5. PC 2005-37 Corneils Crossing — Annexation and Zoning 6. PC 2005-36 Lynwood Baptist Church— 1 1/2 Mile Review 7. PC 2005-27 Autumn Creek Unit 1 — Final Plat 8. PC 2004-27 X-Pac Preliminary/Final Plat 9. PC 2005-34 Evergreen Farm— Annexation and Zoning 10. PC 2005-48 Del Webb — PUD Zoning 11. SSA Tax Policy 12. Draft Policy for Collection of Transportation Development Fees for Kendall County Highways 13. Discussion of Future Incentive Programs to Attract Commercial/Industrial Business to Yorkville 14. Additional Business Page 1 of 3 DRAFT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Thursday,July 21,2005 7:00 pm City Hall Conference Room Present: Mayor Art Prochaska(arrived at 7:10) Shane Flynn,Yorkville Farms Alderman Marty Munns, Chairman David Knott, Yorkville Farms Alderman Joe Besco Phil Stuepfert, SEC Planning Alderman Jason Leslie David Schultz, SEC City Attorney John Wyeth Lisa Welz, Kendall County Record City Administrator, Tony Graff(arrived at 7:30) Jim Ratos, Parkway Bart Olson(arrived at 7:50) John Duggan, Lincoln Prairie Brian Watkins, Peaceful Pathways Montessori Jim Olguin, Yorkville Farms Betty Bennett, Corneils Rd. Patrick Hughes, Ocean Atlantic Gary Bennett, Corneils Rd. Dan Kramer, Attorney Kim Kaskel, Comp. Plan Revision Lynn Dubajic,Yorkville Economic Roberta Konicek, Comp. Plan Revision Development Corporation Howard Rosenwinkel, Comp. Plan RevisionAladdin Nassar,Woodlands, Inc. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm by Chairman Munns. 1. Approval/Correction of Minutes: 1/20/05, 4/21/05, 5/19/05, and 6/16/05—The minutes for 4/21/05 have Alderman Munns name misspelled. The minutes were approved with the notation that Alderman Leslie was not in attendance at any of the meetings, Alderman Besco was not in attendance 1/20/05, and 4/21/05, and Alderman Munns was not in attendance 1/20/05. 2. PC 2005-28 Woodlands,Inc.-Annexation and Zoning—This is a 4 '/2 acre parcel on Rt. 34 200 yards East of Rt. 47 that is currently zoned Agricultural, and would like to be zones B3 Commercial, and annex into the city. This will move on to COW. 3. PC 2005-29 YBSD—Annexation and Zoning—This is for water treatment, it is west of the creek. This will move on to COW. 4. PC 2005-22 Prestwick of Yorkville—Preliminary Plan—The size of the Park site has been made smaller at the request of the Park Board. Some of the lots were removed, and there was a minor change in the configuration of the roads. It meets all the standards of zoning with no variances. There was some discussion about the way the intersections lined up. They will be changed to line up as a 4 way intersection. This will move on to COW. 5. PC 2005-25 Westbury Village POD 6—Final Plat—This will comply with the Preliminary Plat. It will move on to COW. 6. PC 2005-31 Peaceful Pathways Montessori—1 %Mile Review—They will agree to the annexation agreement so long as it allows the Montessori School to operate. This will move on to COW. Page 2 of 3 7. PC 2005-30 Ocean Atlantic—Rosenwinkel Property—Annexation and Zoning— This is a 128 acre parcel South of Cornelis Rd.,goes South to the Yorkville Business Park, and continues West to Beecher Rd. They would like to change the zoning from MI to R4 with not any requests for apartments. It will be single family homes for 48%of the property, 30%of the property will be for open space, and a place for Town homes on the South and West. This will have to go through the requirements for PUD. This will comply with all the requests for Park dedication and will be contingent that the city adopt the Northwest Comprehensive Plan. There would be an amendment for an annexation agreement and the property would be bound by the annexation agreement and would go through the PUD process. This will move on to COW. 8. Fox Hill Economic Incentive Agreement—This is a commercial center that the IDS department of IDOT in Springfield has required an excessive deceleration lane out to Fox Hill using a material called BAM. Since this is an off site improvement, they are requesting the city to agree to a sales tax reimbursement program of 1/2 of the sales tax generated on this property for 12 years or$83,000. There was some discussion about the length of time, and 10 years after the first occupancy would be agreeable. This will move on to COW. 11 9. PC 2005-04 Lincoln Prairie Yorkville—Special Use Request—This is for an Asphalt Plant. A study was done and the nuisance level for the odors of the asphalt would be 40 parts per billion. 8 parts per billion would be any detectable smell. With the velocity of the wind being less than 5 knots (which would happen less than 1% of the time) 4.3 parts per billion will be detected 100 yards away, which is the closest proposed building to the plant. There was already a Public Hearing for this. This will move on to COW. 10. Northwest Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment—There will be a Public Hearing for this on August 10th. This will limit Industrial Development in this area to what is currently there,with no room for expansion. Right now there is a proposed residential area over an existing Asphalt Plant. Mayor Prochaska is worried this Comprehensive Plan,the way it is proposed, will create a problem for an existing business. There will be some Open space, or recreational areas around the existing plants (which include Aurora Blacktop,Kendall County Concrete, and Feltes Sand and Gravel plant). This will move on to COW, then there will be a Public Hearing on August 10th. 11. Population Projection and Residential Development Key—This is updated monthly, with a population update every 6 months, and it is passed out to the city's partners, such as the School District,the Fire Protection District, the County,the Forest Preserve District, IDOT, Economic Development, the Chaimber of Commerce, the Metro Study, and others. It is based on current developments, and possible developments that have had some kind of discussion with the city. If no other developments were allowed to build the city's population would be at 38,000. With developments that have not yet annexed into the city the population would be at 62,000. • Page 3 of 3 12. Proposal for Cost of Doing Feasibility Study for Downtown Redevelopment TIF District Process (Downtown Business Area)—A resolution of intent has been passed. This will cost up to $40,000 which is not budgeted and can be recaptured through the TIF,but the city will have to fund this up front with Fund Balance dollars. This is based on a redevelopment plan the city will adopt for the TIF project. The city will drive the project to be able to have more control over it. Some of the property owners are willing to front fund some of the project. We will not know if any of this will qualify for the TIF district until the study is completed. This will move on to COW. 13. Discussion of Future Incentive Programs to Attract Commercial/Industrial Business to Yorkville—The city will be more willing to create an incentive program if the business will create jobs for local residents and if that business would be willing to use other Yorkville businesses for services and to build the building. The bigger business rewards would be a bigger investment with the city,but the % of return would be smaller that with a smaller development. This city document with the Industrial program would mirror what the county does, and Commercial developments would be under a separate program. The city can change the points for industrial, targeted industry, or regional businesses. There would be a credit if the business would use Yorkville contractors and workers and if they would partner with other local businesses for services. Points will be awarded for the total number of jobs created, the type of industry, the investment in the community, and the potential sales revenues. Public improvements will be considered. How will the development enhance future development around it. The city would like to make things favorable for a company that could choose to move,but would stay in Yorkville and expand. This would be a Non-Transferable 3 year abatement program of 75%, 50%, 25%of sales tax. A very large project could be 50% of sales tax for 5 years. 14. Additional Business—None. The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 pm. Minutes submitted by Laura Leppert. BUILDING PERMIT REPORT United City of Yorkville Department of Building Safety July 2005 TypesofiPermits -F 2 anvil rof Permits Y Number Issued SFD (Beginning 101h MU ltiPle- Fam[Y Commercial Industrial Miscellaneous Totaln Construction Cost 2 Permits= Strath / ve I July 2005 1 139 54 0 0 4 0 81 $10,585,000.00 Calendar Year 2005 1 762 278 5 0 29 0 445 $67,834,115.00 Fiscal Year 2005 445 152 0 0 13 0 280 $34,132,659.00 July 2004 89 39 0 0 1 0 49 $7,182,910.00 Calendar Year 2004 2 I 616 287 3 0 7 0 318 $58,139,358.00 Fiscal Year 2004 344 155 0 0 4 0 185 $33,113,763.00 July 2003 107 36 5 0 4 0 62 $10,695,205.00 Calendar Year 2003 3 519 , 197 11 0 19 1 291 $50,088,125.00 Fiscal Year 2003 � 304 101 8 0 11 0 184 $26,309,724.00 July 2002 83 22 1 0 2 0 58 $5,227,116.00 Calendar Year 2002 4 490 157 3 2 28 0 300 $36,294,121.00 Fiscal Year 2002 249 62 1 0 12 0 174 $14,505,892.00 July 2001 55 22 2 0 1 0 30 $6,998,754.00 Calendar Year 2001 281 99 5 4 5 1 167 $25,113,732.00 Fiscal Year 2001 168 55 4 3 2 1 103 $15,316,312.00 t Permit Number Y-05-0012 was voided,thus only 762 of 763 assigned permit numbers were actually used 2 Permit Number Y-04-097 and Y-04-098 were issued for each side of a duplex,only 1 structure was built. 3 Permit Number Y-2003-324 was voided,thus only 519 of 520 assigned permit numbers were actually issued. Permit Numbers Y-2002-034 was voided,thus only 490 01491 assigned permit numbers were actually issued. BUILDING PERMIT REPORT United City of Yorkville Department of Building Safety June 2005 ....................................................... i Types of Permits s - F 2 anvil Y Number of Permits Issued SFD (Be;nn•w oas� Multiple-Family le Fa milY Commercial Industrial Miscellaneous Total Construction Cost 1Pernats-I Structure) June 2005 172 55 0 0 3 0 114 $11,027,814.00 Calendar Year 2005 623 224 5 0 25 0 364 $57,249,115.00 Fiscal Year 2005 306 98 0 0 9 0 199 $23,547,659.00 June 2004 I 128 55 0 0 1 0 72 $10,515,220.00 Calendar Year 2004 2 I 527 248 3 0 6 0 269 $50,956,448.00 Fiscal Year 2004 255 116 0 0 3 0 136 $25,930,853.00 June 2003 104 34 2 0 4 0 64 $8,083,515.00 Calendar Year 2003' 1 412 161 6 0 15 1 229 $39,392,920.00 Fiscal Year 2003' 1 197 65 3 0 7 0 122 $15,614,519.00 June 2002 83 17 0 0 4 0 62 $3,543,862.00 Calendar Year 2002 4 407 135 2 2 26 0 242 $31,067,005.00 Fiscal Year 2002 166 40 0 0 10 0 116 $9,278,776.00 June 2001 60 22 2 3 0 1 32 $5,639,428.00 Calendar Year 2001 226 77 3 4 4 1 137 $18,114,978.00 Fiscal Year 2001 113 33 2 3 1 1 73 $8,317,558.00 I Permit Number Y-05-0012 was voided,thus only 451 01 452 assigned permit numbers were actually used 2 Permit Number Y-04-097 and Y-04-098 were issued for each side of a duplex,only 1 structure was built. 3 Permit Number Y-2003-324 was voided,thus only 412 of 413 assigned permit numbers were actually issued Permit Numbers Y-2002-034 was voided,thus only 324 of 325 assigned permit numbers were actually issued. T"/ lfrl t Sc1loppe Design Associates, Inc. Landscape Architecture and Land Planning 126 S. Main St. Ph. (630) 551-3355 Oswego, IL 60543 Fax(630) 551-3639 July 29, 2005 Mr. Tom Lindblom Plan Commission Chairman City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Rd. Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment—Northwest Area Dear Tom, Attached is a copy of a proposed amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan for the northwest portion of the City's planning area. We have also included an exhibit that shows the existing Comprehensive Plan for the same area so that you can more readily identify the proposed changes. General The study area for this amendment is outlined as the territory lying east of Eldamain Rd., south of Galena Rd., west of Route 47, and north of Comeils Rd. including a small portion of land lying south of Comeils Rd. and east of Beecher Rd. The purpose for considering these changes to the Comprehensive Plan stem from the Comprehensive Plan amendment for the southern portions of the City, which the City adapted in February of 2005. In that amendment, an additional 913 acres of Office/Research and Industrial were added to the Comprehensive Plan. This additional acreage of Office/Research and Industrial are located along the planned major highways of Route 47 and the Prairie Parkway. Proposed Changes The study area is approximately 1,756.0 acres in size. The current land uses within the study area include: 1. The 300 acre Westbury Village Property which has been annexed to the City 2. Feltes Sand and Gravel pit 3. Aurora Blacktop Asphalt Plant 4. A composting facility east of Aurora Blacktop Page 1 of 3 5. Kendall County Concrete 6. The closed Nelson landfill property 7. Undeveloped agricultural uses which encompass the majority of the study area Rob Roy Creek and a northerly tributary to the creek run through the area. The study area is split by two school districts with approximately 501 acres in the Plano School District and 1,255 acres in the Yorkville School District. The existing Comprehensive Plan outlines the following land uses: 1. Commercial Space (75.0 acres) 2. Industrial (871.0 acres) 3. Office/Research/Industrial (281.0 acres) 4. Transitional Neighborhood (255.0 acres) 5. Open Space (274.0 acres) The primary change identified in the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is changing approximately 1,152 acres of Industrial and Office/Research/Industrial in the western half of the study area to Suburban Residential. With the amendments, the proposed land uses would be as follows: 1. Commercial Space (99.0 acres) 2. Suburban Neighborhood (111.03 acres) 3. Transitional Neighborhood (252.0 acres) 4. Open Space (295.0 acres) An important element of the plan to bring to your attention is that the existing industrial uses of Feltes Gravel, Kendall County Concrete, Aurora Blacktop, and the composite facility are identified to ultimately someday be Suburban Residential. This change should be viewed as a long term change in land use and not something that would necessarily happen in the near future. However, if the proposed residential property surrounding these existing industrial uses were to develop while the current industrial uses are in operation, then it would be necessary for the residential uses to incorporate appropriate buffering of those uses. The potential need for this buffering will need to be described in the text of the Comprehensive Plan. Conclusion Considering the above, the City Council is requesting that the Plan Commission conduct a public hearing on the proposed amendments to gather input from the public as well as the Plan Commission. Following the public hearing, the Plan Commission should forward a recommendation on to the City Council reflecting the Commissions thoughts. Page 2 of 3 I will make a brief presentation on these changes at the August 10th Plan Commission meeting and will be available to answer any questions that the public or the Commission might have. Sincerely, Schoppe Design Associates, Inc. IQfl - . Mike Schoppe CC: Plan Commission Members Mayor Art Prochaska Tony Graff—City Administrator Emo Furfori, Schoppe Design Associates, Inc. MS/dh Page 3 of 3 I :• • -"' - . -. --, C ,„:,,' •::-.:,-,;4`: LE-Al A w • 0 i ():I 11 11111 41 iC 41 1 Lt CO I iX .„ ,. , • ..,•,. :.?,.-4,..?:,':,41-.,,',...•,;.:`'',1.1:-',A,',4,, '•• r',,,,,,,,., . • .„.. , . , . ... , ,;,.•: •:,.,44•,,.,. •!.';',:- :!' :"'/:-P" -',' __________ink ., .. ...,,,,...,,,,, ,,,.;:•,,,,-...,•,:•,.-•.'....'.,-..•.,..,•,''' , v,,:,,;..:: 7-,,..•....,,,, •:,:,...'_„,...,.,..',:,,,:;•••,:•4,:if.'..,:i?i-,•.".;:'i;,i•:::',.!•:,":.'si'i'.;•:.:1•-:•)•'•.'''.',:.'-•. ..,..,,::.0..-4•'Pi-.'11:-..,,•?, --71,-;:••:.;•.,,•;':'••••';••••••••:.'i:,'-:',,•:,.: ::::::,... ;::.....;., ,•.•. '-'-,...••,''..: :•',•,,,r•-. •••.2.•,',.-.:'•.1...,,•-,..c:„.17,:';r 1.':'L i,T,'",::'',...:.N1‘.:I4'' .:,',..1'.Y S';'..-7.'',.;.'',,;:1#;,*".....-,,',... LU '',..';::"..?•::. ',.:';:,..''''-,'.,,,;.-,.,,..„-;.,:',.,':..,,':,....'.;,,.,:',,:'...'.1',.,-.1,,..,, .....::..-:," ,.•,,, ,..',1‘..`,..,';',. .•,:-..''..,':-,-;;11,,,,•;:! '',;•'.1';`::?1,;!.. :-....‘'; '!:`,,,F.:":;,',•,‘L'i,",'I:‘'...''..'.;- l'. ';':::,::: :','",::''''',.--.:','I'l::':J''.,', '', . ,"' .::::::72:4;.''' i''', 'IC:-,;.t.:-.v. '',*!'::.i.:-:,f,,'!1'.. "c,;,:;i: :::?4",: i...''',;::!li:,',1,e1';::'''..,:.:J. -',;: ,,,',', ','1,\ .::-..,:::':• .:S,,,,. . . ..r., .• , ,;'.:'.'.'. ......' '',,.:, " :'..;'..'... :,` .„::k:....:,_,.'::':::,:''':..„.,,..2 ,,:::::,:..,..:',‘ .;",I.,,,''',''•.::,' '.' -..;,...:',.''''''''!/,',..''','!;.C.'•' '''',. .:'''...,'''.::::1::;!:?•':.:7.t;'!:;:...:',.';',..;.'i("1.-/,':::„ ;:f.:,..:,,.- ::.4.,"l'...'2.'.',',.'.,'• '-'..: -.' 't: ;'' ;;; ':!.. ‘,1,'', ,. ::::-,. .',...'.,:, ''....,'•Y''..::',':::‘,-J;.'::,',.;-1:::%,,. .'.').,'',Y''',;';'.'...`_.i.",':: :!:;,,-;. ';',';:"4, „:,.....: ,,,,...,...,,;, ...,,,..,,,,,,,,,.. ,::...,,, ,i4.,,,,,,,..,,-. ,..,, ,...-.,,...,.•f „„:-.'.. - ' ,,.-:',..,.,",1,.f, •'•."'”, ":'",',:.,'..,7", :•.'''t,.-..t",, ,',, c.;:".',41,--.,.;:t;74..'.e.....,i".7,,,.',`.'t7",'-',,r›,,,, NI- 1,,---: , . : - ,;':'-'•-••••:_.••••;-•',':•.‘..i.-„ ,:::..''::::',''••'•.„',.2:":•'..,•';':•..,:•,•,;,ri:;•:;,......,( .',,^-;,,,•';:'' :.• '.•..-i 'i•'..,...',.•','...::-,;•..•:....`;'.;',''.c,..:..„•',I':::•:..',....),:. ..,..:!.,•x•:,..;3•,:..1:t.4,:::-.,•,),...,,:„.":„;•,..:,',,,,,,,.,i, 1,.•.':;41,.‘:•,-.:•::::::':•.':,„. ..'Pr•';',.;r :::' P. ..'':..','-',.,r, ::',..,•:,..::•• •!:?::',T..',4.-. f;•:!..:,,::: •:,,,;,,4,;•,,[-,,,;,;..•:••4i-,.•:f,.:, ••,:`.t,f'..•.i,r,,,::::::7:1:: :1.:',',••'',;-:,214',..1:,4.;''f:.,ii..:,•...,k,.,':":1".:',. .,,'44:i•'' ,,,,,;.!,...,,,,,,.:,..-.;,:,.,,-,,,,,:,,::,-.,:,,,,,:',..,,, :;•, ..,i••!:,•,.,,.,:.,,,,.,,2,,:..;',..:,',;-•:•:!:,..h.•'. .,-.•,;.:,„„*--./ ',.::,'.,1•::!, , ,.•:, ,7.,,,,,:,,,,,',-.•:•v,';•••;',,,;;,,,.•• ; :::.',;',.:•",C'Z:-.4%,••;•:::.1') ,:••, '2 :''' '.', :. •,--,,.. 174:,''''):-.:, -'-7-'• :,--1. r' ',''''',.i ..L''''. ''.'''''.1,':.': ' '::' . : . '''\''''''','::::;...::::::: ..,..F',.'...',:.e.'..:-1'2.',..',',-.''F. I . ..'•'..;:.:. ...(ii'.:\"'..'..1 ',:',14' '.' ''16111P.' , . , ''''' ''+'..''' ' .. ,,ak''' .iiiiia;1111.' '''.—.7.i,',-,,, . ltitaiiim1.11, - ''''':' :•:•:•P:. , :••' . .,"., ;- '••,.:-.'?'; . { :.a.:{."'.,.:.a.::; ,{a;',,:a aa P,,a 'P.'''':':{{.Pa'P{'fPP.....,•P;t'.a:{. a... rii. 1,4 SEIMM'‘. , a...al !,...,... '{a{j{'P',P::P:'4:174.''.. ,;.:..i7";-;:'' : :';. .';:p ,••r: (n ..-• : -. ',":,....',,:, ‘,, :.,i,,,,i,r,:'''-=:',-- ..... '....,, :;-4,''.'r•tsr..r . ,,,,;(i:+;',,,g,,,,,,,A?1,,'r r' ,.;..p:,,,;. - ::•;;''',,r,,'..'"''',.., —:;:,..:.;,•.:-:.',;-:....:::;;'f ;:..:; :::Vitt;,ii,;ki.;,',',::'.',;,.;:':;',";.4:'t;: : ;i',.,f).:.',;.,?l;.'' s,':',.i'- , ,.,,!. ....,.,,-, ,,.. ..4.,,,4-:;v411',',,,'1....•'" '''';.tr,V;-..-,,Ai4!:44'ii„,;°"rik:.,.:Fr 7,".^4'."'i' ' :"::%:::"r.:...,1-:; I::: . , P''.. ' '. f,.fa•'.''a i‘P.':;:a,:.;‘.a.!'1!.(:.' 'Ii:'41,1 aal.{;1 iaLa:a.Pa '.{:aa:,.. 1 I I {.'. '' ...a:, { ' a.Pa'.•'P a a..' ...: r!fa'1 Paa'{aPV:a'aP';',a'i'Nr''.{ ','''''ara'IlLaaa:',4..,?• .'..';',t.:1.P.a • II,a i;!;.PPia.a,,.::',a,....'Pa a ia IP:a P';'.::...a ' i ..., a a'...:P 1.aa:': a:a •.{af.'ir{{. '....'{'a:/4.{1,{ia.6.a.: .',..''..,',',a,'...,;,,a,{. ,„9..,.a .' .{P.'::i P., 'P'aa'aP'.''::a'a P.,'..',tf.a.a::aai:'aaaa a a....:i Pr.::PC:.{.. j:'i '.4r'•?"'a,..V'r...a. 4. 4 aaa qf'...a''a• ., !II : a a{ f .i a.aa a a ' ,.,'{' .,f ..aa:..:".'a a a a..a',,,a{a'a{'''.c Pa'aP: ''{. '1.;'a'YPP4.: 'J.{aVaa aa{.1{4'P''':. P{'{'3''Va40,4{e.,..'a..!:la.aa. i. {, ., ... 1 a,....4i...m.,. ..a,.a.,{a, Ia .a a f ...{7.{.aa'{ a{' -.„''Z,"/"'`, ;..,. P4.4:,..-:`/Q'''.-;,...-...,- ,iiikit ,, ''.", '7,:..`.,:;.?.,-, ,&=,.1:::„!_,, i.,•,^.',,',7F,,!), ..‘ `'',,,‘ ' I I c RD. . . .. ..'.....-,.,,-.:-..,.;-.., .. ..,,..,.,:',,,,,,,... ....:...‘..,:.:,;::,. ••:..,''''.'..-;•,''.i;v:``.711'1'...;.:•":"..:1,,',.--.4,-,r!,.',";:. •'r.:,..r,o 7' /-1 0 NE,.._- t-, '',.,•-•;',..-..-'''...:...--',.....-...,..-.,...7.,-....-..:.....,'-':..-,..,'..- -,....,:. '-..,,:...,,;.... Ur\ _ _ ..... 1 !..''..,.::;:-..,.:,':::::...-:"..s.''..:..::..',::.!;.Y.,..1:',' ...:',':-?,:,."':...1,,''; :'''.'.-:'•:.::'''.:';'',:.:,•.„.....4'::: : .,..:,,,...,z."..,,T,',;(i''',1'-'•''', ..''''4')Ilf^..,:"?"'`',C;;;;'....V •A...,— ,,...,11.-:1,q:c.:",,,;......,••= 11 .,":."''','":.:::.••'",::;:"..:,;:''",":::-.- ,::";:'.:,":‘;',:..7:".,:::;-..,.?',:ef.•.„,:e;',.'"r:^.‘,".:,.•:il.:"‘;,44i/72'4i:',J1 'i.g7J.::"4A1'''..!.,:lilt ' a - ..5.‘,••••,,...--,-,-,:.;,-.7•-••••.--- •-•: ..,...,1.• •-• ., :.,,:..:.;.,.`,..'.,,,'7:1,.:...:''.-.''...•',.?,('',''.'..2•::•,::,.,..,...,,..,.,.'..',.....:';......?'..,,,,',.;.,,',.,:,,.,-:;:;-•,.,,.,-„,..'..'....:...'y::,.:'-•-..,..''L,1,.'-.',.„,.'.1-'.,:..,..:I.:',-.-,.;'':,:--•-.•',•.:.',.,.'.-.'...',-..,'.;-.:::,..'-:..':..--',':'.'..''.;,,'?•''t..:.': '-', :',,',.,.:.-„:';.,l:,-,•4'„,,,,'4,,,',,,-',',7;.':,...,'.t:-f..,:!,:',:,4....;'..',,,-•.';,';:.,.'..,;.,...'1-,..,'',,,i1-,.'.',?',',..0,' 4.,•'.''4',,,'.*f,*,...,.,,.4;„.3...i..s..,.,,.,,:.;o,i..,,,.„V,?",.,;,,...:..'4.,'4At'i:„'';i'.‘,,..i".4.•,Z.!,';"'.:.; ; ‘:! .I; •55 .. ../... ..-..;,t,',..!'..,'-‘,':.`.,..,........,..,.,... ......,..,•,..,, '2 ,-,,..--r r:•..'r .j,:c:',''''''.1'''...,..'try' ,,r,'-!r,,r''•ir :,t,'..,... '. ,`”. --,,fri,,',,'7,'-'7.",;','-'''',,,'.‘,' ' .... ', .;.-•.•', ..,!,',.••.:-.'i,),,,,,,..,'”:,',.:.,'-.s'',”7..,‘'V,;°:' 1.'1'-t; ;',, ..;; .7",. ;:?.11,'47.-`..../,'-.•• "'.,...".. .• • ',.,;,'...';;'..,':', '.'''.-'7."-7:'''' ""III , .,-.1'...7,,::,•,.,','7,:.,,. ,,,,„..;7',.;;',e,.,..,?:,.. •.; ,...•;...:','• 1,.....,,,,,,-.'• ..••.;.t.•, ...-,.- t-',.‘ .-', •,, ..q.:.','j.v i,'4+:4,-'7',-',-,',',,, „..,•,„:,:-.:,1,',;;.2.,-,,J.i...c;,ii;'';•:,....;:i.l'4F7'll'i'...'" '1''''i;.'21.v,'-`.:''''''' '.',,-:.';'•,': ...,,'.7',. ",.i.','.:.,-"..,-.,"" ,''.,"-",.."'', r(r-",'"4" .,',.,.''..'' "7',,,*.`4,',`..,.,2 '.'1,,..',- '‘,...1-':;').;°"40.6.'....:-:.:;,,i-.',f''''''/I''''.j..:,''',.',''''!7' .." !',.;./ ;'*''';":'l'7''''.;•:-`,".:‘,:f6,;-.".'''i'''.::' P:..a'..'f: P.":{.{..,;''a..{‘•'{. '..a'''.r,.:a'''Paa''. P{'.{'•{aai'a:.'...a,"a'''.Pa I'Pi':':...1". '=:P.'P'P'' a :'[.±{5:::'..:4'•7'''''':-. ..:::'''','-'''.1•',,'%,,,:-..'":::....'.: ! ;-7,1,1,!,.:-‘f.:-.7:".7., "..----'.7:7,%"','-7..7-." '....^‘"..,•-;• -'....u,'"::::7,',•;.;4'-.''',1,'"-„"..'-:' .'7.,`,',..,'7.‘:"":.: ' '.:-,• ":,"'.-":,r;.1:''''i.'S::.:.',f',;..,':':"'.;!!„,r''..' '..,"•:' ''. , v.E... g.g• 1 ,.. . , . ..,„,.. , , .• ,„,,,,..„...,,,,.,;;,,, :-..:-..;..,...-•:;;;,...,•-••,:,,, „.-,....„-...,,,... ; .,,,•:1„,;„..A.,,,i2t.,1,.-2-,4. -.•.,•-•:,.,. ,P.-••.•-•,,:- -•,.:-,:-.-:. •';•.,,L.-:•;'-•'-;--,'s'i,,,',',..--,', , ,,, . ,--•,-''...:-r' ''T •,' .'... ,-....%,, ,',- P P i aa P"'Pfa''.'a:PaC .:1'a'a,: *a{',..;.'a.".:..''la P',{Pa.:'..' a;;PIP;':':.{.P'.'P•''1 ' :' ':'....Pa..Pa''[.fa''4'''.'al.':.•'''..'aa'a ':::{.1 . ' ,.• rk_... .. '',,i7;,''..';',:''' f.',.';:: ' :',:',.' '':.: ?`:'. '''':,,‘:::7>,.:....•-',;.'''..:-'.':'''-:',''''" 74:''' ,:-.. ;.t.'.2‘,,,,';'.' . .i::71::,:41.k;'•';',i';'...?.',..',''..1'‘'..;'''• ':'',',. ' 'D '.,•:,'..,i. ,-:,r.'‘,:,'.1.',.'..-`‘,:i:::,:.:2:':''-!..'... -, ‘':'-',., ::•:,' ., ''''..;•;t:',.,;-,f..-:: Jr.. ,..,...,.'.'..4-::-:-./.'-;':.: ..';':;'!;:'-',L..i..'!..''':,',.':','.....,,':'''.7..'..';',;...`-.,....,.„,:.« • .. .''.•,..'1'::,'..,;".,.: .,.'...;:,•,-.:.:'2,;,;''''','.....-.....-'.''''..;r:";.:"..,:.':',.:'41;,.;,.':.....'....':. ,.'.:...,,,::::::,:,...,',,.....:..-';`.:.,:' , 1 . , , ,.. .,:-..-, ' . `' 7' ''''' ' ' .:-." ',.`:,,,;','''' .,":,,:;.,' ',-• '`"7'' ,"''''''''::. ''.'?:" ."AT'',..,1.':.',:•,. ..14,tikibla, :''y'',-'Ll'`,,,'''.(..7" ,. -..i.ik.4.4iii,ii . ,,,, 4;;;;Ir''ii9,1Z,..."',1,:"'.!,‘,;,.i.,;•,,,.;.,•41..,:;:..:.7«:.,Nt,;..„ .1•94..illfili.4 1.1a iNDEX" —-— —--111111.111$1 Tc—---1115"111-10111 II I ill'aguiril r,, AREA BOUNDARY i • ktalliti • rilif.71,jill PLANNING iru 1 I I SU AL NEIGHBORHOOD LAI ND USE —I I TRANSITION 1.11miii* Ig .. 111311111111.N".‘ Fg-0:.ilkiliwillir. 11111.1011°;'41Lr*iatiw' I . ( I i I IURBAN NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ESTATE NEIGHBORHOOD TRADITIONAL J BURBAN NEIGHBORHOOD l SCHOOL LIMITS 1p:•, II.. ..11, PPEP XAmR_PROPOSED K:PT 00I°NssGPEEEDRDNOPRSAL AOPDAASDC SE I 1111*:tMdiglialtOTA`• ' ail I ' .rme.1!2,111111'1;ZiO!11% 04tri40 i I.'. inirt-0 r'llitr4,1,e, ijk, 2400 ,iijo,l..'1111 v *)i,for I 600' 1200' 1 J, 111/1111111/4 '' -1111:6•1.,.41.41.....' 0 ;kigrkrallrl;'):1411g11,!'ilialf;c ..itI 0 fim."Im...1.1.11 . - 200' Scale: 1 - 1 )C rihVIre411,1-iiiii,10-11.11.§VAD* iot r"--471 oICNOFD:UICMSETE/RRRICEAISLAELARCH/INDUSTRIAL NORTH , 2005 •1 01111..5- - .4..;L,..._ ''..z. --4''4tIfillii& Date: July 29, 2005 Iffit-ii,ti,19,:i. Es,Iv_ Adopted: — ,SCI10-PPE D ESIGN,,IS_S,0(7,1,1,1,,,,T,:,:, . II (630)551-3355 PLAN ,,,,,„dccape.4,-ch,:ectrire c$770 I..a.icp.. ._ 126 S MAIN STREET nsli'EGO.IL 60543 G F,,,I.A"(630)551-3639 EXISTING Base considered as preliminary,data should be , ct to change. ..i.i.,,,I. ,-. 800 Game Farm 0 ,..,f,,,O The United Rd. City Of Yorkville COMPREHENSIVEBasmapping .. 1" •P Yorkville, IL 6056 ILLINOIS .A I • An -rs r53_4350 \- 6iu-' UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE .anotafi otvureir.er iAfiacHnan?dt 1 oadnno,easn d .and plan is concepntual in nsoutbireecptretosecnn.taancnn°yernrePTgihruellsdaltfoar°rymabpepsrotvaavlatiPablalein iinnsfeoseurmdhle • r — — ij — 400 Ani owe am ow rim gni NMI II= MN IIIIII 0, D 105 Co • • ' _AN "\,:,..A1,.:::iii:i ,.• . . ,, / iiikti '7,',,:.::,,.:...: ;.„,.,:,-. .,...6 - _ , I a , / ' ' tpt, Q • GAir L z, w �� SENA R LU — / r/ ,,,,,,, ,\ .,.,, ______7 \ n r /_ '' .t `\� t, �'t � YORKVILI_E ; SCHOOL DISTRICT I 'F'''''`'.'''',,,,:..,:'..,"';''.',1''''..I'-,''';:;'''''''''''''1"'4'111111:":.:'.r.-1::''''''' „ 4011*t> en, PLANO Q ��:i F , SCHOOL DISTRICT '�' (n C)' ' - ./- 4`.---E---.7-- -- . _4//7/y- ,,\ — , \ . / .,,..• „ , , ;n • ri � :. n f raw bill. ORNEILS RD. _________,_ Air; . ,:, �j a "' 1. ......, • ., i a iC l! '''.::;:k:',';''.:11'.',,.%,4', t: y A';'.'',,:',1:..21' 1:'.,-;,s17'.:.•''.: '..",t,,..';-,:‘,"::..,..",':::2, 1:s:'s-. . i ‘: I . it t y. 4i M..'' i i• p . \ „. 1'.t1`i, My 14 i Lf"•+t'ti art "t ..;-"L,,,,:,",- ' �, ,ids t , t .:'” a t �.x�1 �..', 1 F.�.t, 4 ttt p � r. ! f : "euro, . � �r *r 5 n)tt ' y u.a y t 1 3yp t i l t r } i p A `hi.'S r § y V i r 3 a t, r fY t �_ L et T L Yp 1 , 1 i g t 3 i Y I,. R• ,- 4 1 lA �. 4 S1 i z r r i?5 Ss• '°r F+,C4t ,�ht �:. `t r t r `kk C,k}`Ntn 3 r:Ywrrc r ,h �� ti a 1r T �, -�p.F - • INDEX: * II, I LAND USE —_, . _ IV's-- '1_, 1\ ._._. N1r0,o0irr giI,‘4iF-,r'1/—4d I.- _ ESTATE NEIGHBORHOOD I PARK/OPEN SPACE SUBURBAN NEIGHBORHOOD EXISTING ROADS aiklix.,14_5l7iI.:5,0r./01 1$'A.in?A ,._..-- ....:.:..,...;_, .i:.,...-.1:7_,. I„'(, I y -01 I I TRANSITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD '� PROPOSED ROADS t AW0I I URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD i' !' PROPOSED PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY AREA► I -� TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD F"'""1 SCHOOL LIMITS ail Ill) EXISTING INDUSTRIAL SPECIAL y��`e �® �'� j COMMERCIAL USES IN KENDALL COUNTY 8 � 1 /j - I INDUSTRIAL 'u`` ;_ i r _� OFFICE/RESEARCH/INDUSTRIAL A ______ _ I 0 Scale: 1" = 1200' Osoo izoo 2400 SCHf�Pl'E DSICI�'ASSOCIATES INC'. ', Landscape Architecture and Land P/•arvairvo NORTH Date: July 29, 2005 1 6 S. ntA!,N STREET Pt,. (630)55/-3'355 Adopted: 2005 OSWEGO.IL 60543 FAX(630)55/-3639 PROPOSED 40 crr, The United City Of Yorkville COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMMENDMENT -, -� 800 Game Farm Rd. ' Yorkville, IL 60560K. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE Base mapping compiled from best available information.All map �� 630-553-4350 data should be considered as preliminary,in need of verification,and ILLINOIS subject to change. This land plan is conceptual in nature and does ALT E R N AT!V E #7 not represent any regulatory approval. Plan is subject to change. T - I � r � , ba: w 1: 4. , ' �_4 mz''' D 105 ..1. mow um to INN — 'r N — — — — r INN 4 ,..' } ip . d.. i O c 1,°<,, 1 V ��. :44AI l`C -- Z : b v ry�^4 '^ y��:n� 1i i'S�*�4��++i yr A Lu ,Fh t r" ds, 4�"r ,x�,S 1 7z1,: 7F^i;'+. A r�[ sx Q'' /�. a z � A� 1 t<-?�7v,,�SA- wk }d.€ 84�` � r . _ Ian k a. u, • r i. 1..¢ ,1:.•,.1.-::,''-i-' Y'S • .gil`` ;p :' r d'"ly t: ,, ..0(.:3410.%,,N, '. Z t f `*" .;;;;;;.9 Qtka fi » ' Vs r�,., t: ..?9, N>�1: 1 3p" fk�1 1 ..,,!..'•,,,,.',;',a,I } `ttv,z'i'I 'n w!"?.„,,".t v i ax,,aZt]'"gyp, r O;: .,jz 4y ny ,p b,r r 1t,x s k !Ct ;+'I£$`,w. • % 1�ir,,,1 �'j(,,1N.t r Tfi' h 't y^'. t k f 'aJ , h rsa a n� i •I vett' e' <. A 4,. ,dry I,i _ ______ �/, k4 t,? '' 7 • •rr,-•,„:>„10,1.,." + 4t, w , a; i,. ,,a~ , e+'�� 5 L •• ,' �.t` z r r 1yoto; rH fis*k ' r r, "t',v r'1'� >� W f a i s x' ,, I A '''Gpw 1 'er.t iiWatC,f` ""s �r i,,41,,,,' rc.f ��t�rrs j, ti, `:u,r�i r f „!!`if.:"....,,, .a i,z ?� '� hr 414 s S `i\„ c p a�',{4 wr i” ti::fi,z q 1,.t ' 411t 3 T. `�r� �` h a At. !, T aYto .7 sy, i4r �' 9r `i eY ti t R; xrMd e e .1,-",',,,'',-,1.', r �at d 1 v $ i C t 13 n; r 4. r �tar4� t n r �► t. Y Tk a r��ta a kid 1 x 1 �t ,..'',44'.,,, iyy�n tr w{ 4 3k4tcyrL ',,k,„',''''..;',,,,-..,7,'.,,, div y e a 4 7 , If xF.S '.:/ h:h d iG kl r*}»l 1 ./11' 11 4 4 X 1L1 ,,:, i "-, , r 4 ,x y! '.6:,',:::.,! ';;'..1'•"14:4•1; i. i �,5� ro a t ri :., '' ,',..,•:',0i;:,,i' t' N;ii,, Iugra ° YORKVILLEoj .`as ',,, n ', ,,5 §, SCHOOL DISTRICT • t ,. 1 • . I — - _ ' , .,, I, -• I ' 1'.',:',:at .41.'',''',:t;'*.i.,',$').. W c );',:ii PLANO Q > '°i,'1 fr; nr :h v: ' r 1 i}:: is SCHOOL DISTRICT Al ,,' 1,, CO 4! I I .r h n t7°q. :� x ki t m .. r I`a t L' ;P • '`s4 ' ORNEILS RD. '.0'..' is �; -- lig -- r5, i. t, 1111 M�rt1 e�S `-i 4 4 i1 „,y ' Aram',,ria , ,° V ,nh r"ih . i rtj T l�l ,.y�rT^k rtn" yy'^Y (}'ti is ,:4-‘:,-..,,'�, 44,'„,•''," � J r. } i tl ,3£zd ° 1V".Ct ag,x, .Fy* 'hSr� tr z ." : '�, r F 4 S �„,rL�-,� t 9 .,�'.11'S ^'ila'I'd i h`4� k .kn V'''''''''''• f':,.• mL''T •1 iM y, a f r #'.„4-4:- • y {t 1'�.tF YYyy,,,�,, r 1 rra4 z i ''t S t h r 3«1 cc''4041 7i „ X ,x•W'I 1� 7 , .$. f• vli 1 rvF • ,,,� t i 1 v Y „• .a i s ct,, Ak t51 3 t re fp 4,1,,, , c b. Vi„ I,}v ,41��1�Y3'c� r ,,,,%,- k: to ,y r (, �, ?� ," Sr10 5 r roY 1A J ;„iF,'• a • v t �" 1+r at 5 r r v ?tR V,Z. ` 1 'y'�I'.: . ", f �; 'y �ay.nh c 5.37' �h. 1 ��g,, } 4 A r,.0 U d�- t e i. r 4 v yrd l i d , r i dt Yk°'`d N.,r F rr 1 ''r.r `.ra1;4+ ti A 1+� :^�-'t'7't5,.� a,f r� 5f in :n ih x 3„," �'.,..4,,,s 'r an; a f 4;-,2 ,;, ,t • p .a°d: c tI ,,yy - ''ts y ,. c x 4�C .0.4 1+s.nR�;'s q .,Fi.id Y r (,:; -, �y�1; �•'.: g. ,'4 +,t6x �` d-'.�� z eYf:0 7 I d t >>�.+� �t ki,1 4f n r N tiN,v,"k ,t'f z ' rr't, A .'•'4 i 1, �r 'jJ;“ ar k `tai L ?:('! k r 4 t t 1 i' > k �. ,r.' ,N•. t'"1 h.1Yt yam' w�qs"��>r.'�'f�� 7tt t .4- ��.�o`r< tJI r�3,�` t}i£� "7lhw',r.;V:'...,..50 Yt�'^��s r �„ J: i�� '�+' --w,ata• �, `a, t r53�°.:72. '. u' 4; ' . iA v r q, y h"¢-ra.6 y'�''a'`nt a' ' 1 k`pii�i 4.9;71�-rgii'4,7;.* $S*"2`,„,4� ,.,,,# `r ..4, Y r :%�-v .., t ,m'dN a n w 4 4?. 5 .* - ii, . ",i44,1:-t tk' i 1 t}z ,a�, "1' 1F. 1'ti ri,✓ Yk=}r�1 .3� -� " "tti:��''trH�+d Y' r y `''t{R'vj,.»'.1 t z x 0 � }c 4K ,t .1 �.. z. a:i , I j4 ° .1 Y .eH +dry ak 4y� ` <, R it " ' s, . ,9 l e Mh,..,,, 7'fi y*7 ,. 4:fM q�':,�Ip,), °' :1.t'Y °st,,*.m., ;4, 4 N"r t °i F ,,,t , T-,.1 '•,,s'.'',,',";:,,'tC ..fY w .k, ig: i'f , „, ��",'.4 �l �m� 1d1 '' � 1T A i xJ��r• i at« d S 9�a''S F. z Vi: , 93 � . t°' .';',, i z."Li t p,, > ,r1.,,5 , „'it °' ,,. 'AN.;4t4^1,' tsrt r�yy s ,,14,0,t `:it rtr', 'V u s` .; :�t�. �'}�1',"''• R 5"..-a.• })F '' a T,'s fl p'� 7G �i wy. 3.1y .+a ' t i 'i.'1 q.`, `--- � d�„, .4. �7-a r F r�� ,k}r}�,i t`,.i t, ,k,£i { y %,;°�4 P t 11:"7"4a. 9'; k7 F;: a g3 a s �Sv S,A , ..-',a,. r - ,'yn, : :^ di f/ �,y,ve. °t,,, ,''; $}' .�1 7.'t 'q ,i} '�a Ip r' nx , L f ' .rpt --/3�,,'�,. hr �'r ,iu �'r°,�,,J r,j��r ;^ � ��d S�v:��i;,. ws �' v� 3. 4 �t '�z sdy., -,v t. }!, t x' I t ; '" -� , g�4Na h? e i t r r s�' ,4. d- is 7 5 k .. G-�. ¢;,,. v -, N to t 94 Ne!%. . ',sw1l� t ,t +E-c4'. ,{a,.,cY a - , —_ INDEX: ®O _". 24--1 ;fligatet, J 1,1;,, ,,,,,./ _ , k v LAND USE / ,tra pil.4& t__ ESTATE NEIGHBORHOOD r""^""""^1 PARK/OPEN SPACE - I I I SUBURBAN NEIGHBORHOOD �'i EXISTING ROADS • + ' 1� Illti ' 11 I I TRANSITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD PROPOSED ROADS —� df��,X51, I �- I I URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD O!'�� PROPOSED PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY STUDY AREA.t r a' [ 1TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD I""■"� SCHOOL LIMITS , r IfT G� ,y I P "t COMMERCIAL 1/A EXISTING INDUSTRIAL SPECIAL flib W INDUSTRIAL USES IN KENDALL COUNTY ri ; --tii w” I y j F-----`7 OFFICE/RESEARCH/INDUSTRIAL 0 GDO' 4266 2400 SCIJOPPE DESIGN ASSOCJA7E.S INC- ii Scale: l2 = ?200' Landscape ftrchitectnre and Land Planning NORTH Date: July 29,2005 176 S. MAIN STREET P11. (630)551-3355 Adopted: 2005 OSWEGO,11,60543 FAX(630)551-3639 PROPOSED ,r !,.,o The United City Of Yorkville COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMMENDMENT "- 800 Game Farm Rd. ra Yorkville, IL 60560 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLEBase mapping compiled com iled from best available information.All map 4.a 630-553-4350 ILLINOIS data should be considered as preliminary,in need of verification,and subject to change. This land plan is conceptual in nature and does ALTERNATIVE #2 not represent any regulatory approval Plan is subject to change 2• car United City of Yorkville Memo •• 800 Game Farm Road jog EST.II‘11.77----18411 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 �n�y Seat® ® Fax: 630-553-7575 �� Nenaflll Canly L/4 E 1�0, Date: August 16, 2005 To: EDC From: Tony Graff, City Administrator' CC: Subject: Eligible infrastructure types survey for special tax bond policy Eligible Infrastructure Favorable Not No Favorable Opinion/Neutral Water mains, laterals and qualified water storage and production facilities Sewer interceptors, mains & laterals Sewer treatment facilities Roads including signaling Right of way landscaping & curbs Engineering and related professional fees Walking paths & sidewalks Park improvements Offsite land acquisition cost for storm water & detention improvements including regional or multi-party storm water management use Certain connection fees Certain mass grading costs Certain pro-rata costs for police, fire and/or public works facilities related to the project A POLICY FOR THE COLLECTION OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR KENDALL COUNTY HIGHWAYS - VILLAGE OF OSWEGO - DRAFT Background The suburban Chicago region has been experiencing tremendous growth over the past few decades. Kendall County and the municipalities within Kendall have recently become a part of this growth trend, as evidenced by the recent revelation that Kendall County is the 2nd fastest growing county in the nation. Additionally, the Chicago Area Transportation Study (CATS) has now included all of Kendall County in its metropolitan planning area. With this tremendous growth comes a myriad of issues, not the least of which is transportation needs. More population means more traffic on the entire transportation network, including state, county, municipal and township roadways. An evaluation of the historical growth trends reveals that the vast majority of new residential units are located within corporate limits. Kendall is no exception. In fact, in 2004, new residential building starts in the unincorporated region of Kendall County represented less than 10% of the total new building starts county-wide.1 The Village of Oswego recognizes this impact on the municipal transportation network, and has taken steps to address the municipal needs through implementation of the Roadway Capital Improvements Cost Allocation & Recovery Program (2004). This program identifies capital costs over a 5-year period and assigns some of this cost to new development, based on an estimated number of new residential starts. Fees collected generally fund improvements on just the municipal transportation system. The Village of Oswego also recognizes that Kendall County, like most counties in Illinois, has limited ability to collect fees from new municipal developments, even though those developments contribute directly to the need for capacity-type improvements on the County Highway System. To remedy this inequity, the Village desires to adopt a policy that will address some of the funding deficiencies on the County Highway System, by collecting fees from new residential developments that will fund capital improvements on County Highways. Fee Guidelines As a rule, all residential developments would be subject to the collection of fees on behalf of the County, even if they don't have frontage on a County Highway. This is because the average trip from nearly every development in Oswego would involve travel on a County Highway. And each new residential subdivision will have an incremental impact on the need for a capacity improvement. In general terms, it is more desirous to have larger developments, with significant frontage on a County Highway, actually install the capacity improvements on the adjacent county highway, rather than pay a fee that is collected by the Village. This tends to be a more efficient means of realizing the capacity improvement. The cost of such a capacity improvement would be credited to the developer, and if the cost is equal to or greater than the fees that would have been collected through cash payments, then there would be no further obligation to pay transportation development fees to the Village. Site specific improvements such as turning lanes, signals, etc. that are directly attributable to the development are exempt from receiving any credit on the transportation development fee. Smaller developments with limited frontage will be more likely to simply pay the transportation development fee. Again, site specific improvements would not yield any credit on the collection of fees. Upon collection of sufficient fees, the County will then have the ability to let a contract for the capacity-type improvement. The Villa cae is supportive of the collection of a transportation fee en behalf of Kendall County, but desires to guarantee that said fees will be spent only on improvements that will directly benefit the residents of the Village. Therefore, the Village will collect and hold transportation fees, and will only release fees to Kendall County upon mutual agreement on the scope and extent of work to be completed on the County Highway. Fee Calculation The Kendall County 2005-2030 Transportation Improvement Plan identifies slightly more than $21 million in needed capital improvements in the Oswego area (see Exhibit 1)2. These costs do not include routine maintenance,but are all generally capacity-type improvements. The Village of Oswego's Roadway Capital Improvements Cost Allocation & Recovery document estimates 2470 new residential units in the 2004-2008 time period. In reviewing that document today, the number of units appears under-estimated, since 890 new residential building permits were issued in 2004.3 Another source of information that provides insight on anticipated development is the Village of Oswego Comprehensive Plan, which is currently being updated by the Lannert Group. Although the plan will probably only be relevant for the next 5-years due to the rate of development,it does identify the ultimate expected build-out for Oswego, considering current municipal boundary agreements and assumed residential densities. That build-out would yield a total Village population of approximately 70,000 people.4 The 2005 population is estimated at nearly 20,000, so approximately 50,000 additional people could move to Oswego in the coming years. In an attempt to marry the County Transportation Plan to the Village Comprehensive Plan, this policy assumes that the Village will, for all practical purposes, reach "build-out" by 2030. Therefore, all the transportation projects identified in the County Plan will need to be constructed, at a cost of$21,050,000 in 2005 dollars. 50,000 people = 2.79 people/units = ± 17,921 units $21,050,000 = 17,921 units = $1175/unit Conclusion An efficient transportation network will undoubtedly be one of the key issues facing Oswego for the foreseeable future. And both Village of Oswego and Kendall County will need to partner their efforts to insure the necessary steps are taken to provide a safe and efficient transportation network that will continue to stimulate the local economy. For these reasons, the Village of Oswego hereby agrees to negotiate in good faith with new residential developments in an attempt to collect transportation development fees consistent with the context herein. Specifically, the Village will attempt to negotiate the collection of not less than $1175 per residential unit for all new developments negotiated in the years 2005 or earlier, or will negotiate the actual construction of the capacity-type improvement by the developer. An inflator of 3% per year, effective January 1, 2006 and each subsequent January 1st shall be added to the $1175 (see table below). This policy will be reevaluated as agreed by both the Village of Oswego and Kendall County. Year Negotiated Fee 2005 or earlier $1,175 2006 $1,210 207 $1,246 2008 $1,283 2009 $1,321 2010 $1,361 2011 $1,402 2012 $1,444 2013 $1,487 2014 $1,532 2015 $1,578 Source: Kendall County Record Source: Kendall County 2005-2030 Transportation Improvement Plan 3 Source: Oswego Building Department 4 Source: Oswego Community Development Department 5 Source: 2000 Census T I, �' e' y of Yorkville Memo rm Road EST, ` L '_nois 60560 1 ;30-553-4350 0k '-off ' o30-553-7575 Date: August 18, 2005 To: EDC From: Bart Olson, Administrative Intern; Traci Pleckham, Finance Director CC: Tony Graff, City Administrator Subject: Economic incentive packages for discussion As discussed at a previous EDC meeting, staff has looked into common types of economic incentive packages that can be used to lure developers/businesses into the City. All examples given are meant to be theoretical in nature, and the numbers that have been chosen are mostly arbitrary but based on general industry standards of sales and tax rates. These examples should be used to identify which types of packages are most favorable and which packages may be more common or favorable in different situations. In studying the options of economic incentive packages a municipality can give to a business, a few policy questions are likely to arise. Traditionally, sales tax rebates are the preferred method of economic incentive packages. In fact, Yorkville already has a few of these packages in place with existing businesses/developers. However, in order to lure more commercial development, more creative options may be necessary. These creative options can involve adding utility tax rebates, multiple layered rebates, capping rebates, and rent kickers. Illustrated with Attachments: Option 1 Sales tax rebates involve rebating a percentage of sales tax to the business. This can be completed as part of a project that involves infrastructure improvements, or as a general incentive to lure a business to the area before the population threshold for the business is present. This is the most common and simple form of economic incentive package, and involves a flat percentage of sales taxes. For example, in trying to lure a big box retail store to the area, Yorkville decides to give up 50% of its sales tax from the development for 7 years. In a 175,000 square foot store, $350,000 of sales taxes is expected to be generated (based on $200 sales per square foot), and $175,000 of that would be rebated to the business developer. Over the term of the agreement, S875,000 would be rebated to the developer. Illustrated with Attachments: Option 2 Utility tax rebates involve rebating a percentage of the utility tax to the business. Generally this is completed as part of a project that specifically involves utilities, such as burying power lines. Policy questions with utility tax rebates involve whether or not the developer is undertaking a special project, or a project that has been encouraged by the City. Most commercial developers require that power lines be buried on their property,but may still be aesthetically hindered by power lines near or adjacent to their property. In this case, it may be beneficial for both the developer and City to enter into an agreement to have these "off-site" power lines buried. In order to do this, the City may offer a percentage of its utility tax for a set number of years. For example, burying power lines may cost a big box retailer $2,000,000. A 175,000 square foot big box retailer is expected to bring in $262,500 in utility taxes (at $1.50/sf) each year. A "50% utility tax rebate for 7 years"package would yield $918,750 for the developer. Not enough to completely pay off the burying of the cables, but possibly enough to give the developer incentive enough to undertake the project. Illustrated with Attachments: Option 3 Multiple layered rebates involve more than one percentage or type of tax rebate. This would be offered in cases where a developer/business is responsible for multiple projects on the property, or needs an incentive to build in the town before the business' population threshold has been reached. For example, a big box retail store has identified Yorkville as a town it would like to build in within the next 5 years. Unfortunately, the population threshold isn't likely to be reached for four years (projected), but the cost of land is expected to grow substantially. Also, the developer has some soil issues that will require some extra mass grading. In response to this, the City offers a substantial incentive package that will rebate 50% of sales taxes for 3 years for land acquisition and general incentives, and an extra 25% of sales taxes for 5 years to subsidy the soil issues. Using the same big box as in the utility tax example, the City can expect S35,000,000 in sales and $350,000 in sales tax ($200/sf in sales). This package would pay-out S787,500 the first 3 years, and $175,000 for the final two years of the package. Assuming $100,000 an acre on a 40 acre property is the current price, with an increase in price per year expected at 5% brings the price in 2010 (when the company would normally build in Yorkville) to $127,628 an acre. Purchasing the land now would save the developer/business $1.1 million dollars in land costs, in addition to the $962,500 it will receive in incentives for land acquisition. Illustrated with Attachment 4 Another option for tax incentive packages includes caps. Caps located at the end of a package are generally included in a project where the end goal is for the incentive to pay off a specific percentage of specific project. For example, the City is currently in an incentive package with Menard's to rebate a portion of infrastructure costs until the total cost is repaid (a.k.a. —no term on the length of the incentive package). Caps located each year in a package may be tied to the perfoimance of the business. In an example from an NIU budgeting class, a mall had an empty anchor store and the City was looking to give incentives to an anchor for taking the anchor space (due to the heavy correlation between anchor store sales and the sales of interior stores). Because the estimated revenue the anchor was going to bring in was largely unknown (due to the shaky nature of the economy and the mall's recent history with not being able to retain anchor stores), the City decided to put a yearly cap on the amount of sales tax rebates the developer would receive (attached). As is illustrated on the chart, the City implemented a sliding scale rebate; falling from 95% of sales taxes within the first year to 55% of sales taxes in the tenth year. However, the yearly cap was set at $700,000 for the first four years, $600,000 for the following three years, and $500,000 for the following three years. Given the projected perfoiniance of the mall ("Total New Sales Tax"), it is shown that the cap amount was less than the amount of sales tax projected; meaning the mall owner received the cap amount, and the City pocketed the rest. As we can see, using a yearly cap can be beneficial in instances when the sales tax amount is generated tough to predict. Should the anchor store have underperformed (as had been witnessed in the past), both the business and the City would have seen their share of sales tax decrease, but if the anchor overperformed, then the business would hit the cap, and the City would gain the extra revenue. The last option studied for economic incentive packages for is rent kickers. This is a folin of a rebate to the City which was used in the previous anchor store example. Should the mall have done successfully enough to remain in the shopping center, and subsequently driven up the property values of the mall (thus increasing rents for stores), the City would receive a portion of the rent increase. In the example provided, this number was set at 7% of the total increase in rent above the base rent at the time of the initiation of the agreement for the first 5 years of the agreement and 3% for the last 5 years. Given a mall that had $8.5 million in rent per year and increased to $12.9 by the end of the agreement, the City re-pocketed $485,800 through rent kickers. OPTION 1 SAMPLE SALES TAX INCENTIVE ANALYSIS ***ESTIMATED*** Annual Property Annual Sales Annual Utility Tax to the Total Annual Year Sales 1% Sales Tax 50% Rebate Tax to the City Tax to the City City Revenue 1 35,000,000 350,000 175,000.00 175,000.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 455,000.00 2 35,000,000 350,000 175,000.00 175,000.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 455,000.00 3 35,000,000 350,000 175,000.00 175,000.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 455,000.00 4 35,000,000 350,000 175,000.00 175,000.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 455,000.00 5 35,000,000 350,000 175,000.00 175,000.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 455,000.00 6 35,000,000 350,000 175,000.00 175,000.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 455,000.00 7 35,000,000 350,000 175,000.00 175,000.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 455,000.00 2,450,000 1,225,000.00 1,225,000.00 1,837,500.00 122,500.00 3,185,000.00 OPTION 1A SAMPLE SALES TAX INCENTIVE ANALYSIS ***ESTIMATED*** Annual Property Annual Sales Annual Utility Tax to the Total Annual Year Sales 1% Sales Tax 75% Rebate Tax to the City Tax to the City City Revenue 1 35,000,000 350,000 262,500.00 87,500.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 367,500.00 2 35,000,000 350,000 262,500.00 87,500.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 367,500.00 3 35,000,000 350,000 262,500.00 87,500.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 367,500.00 4 35,000,000 350,000 262,500.00 87,500.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 367,500.00 5 35,000,000 350,000 262,500.00 87,500.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 367,500.00 6 35,000,000 350,000 262,500.00 87,500.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 367,500.00 7 35,000,000 350,000 262,500.00 87,500.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 367,500.00 2,450,000 1,837,500.00 612,500.00 1,837,500.00 122,500.00 2,572,500.00 OPTION 1B SAMPLE SALES TAX INCENTIVE ANALYSIS ***ESTIMATED*** Annual Property Annual Sales Annual Utility Tax to the Total Annual Year Sales 1% Sales Tax 100% Rebate Tax to the City Tax to the City City Revenue 1 35,000,000 350,000 350,000.00 0.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 280,000.00 2 35,000,000 350,000 350,000.00 0.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 280,000.00 3 35,000,000 350,000 350,000.00 0.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 280,000.00 4 35,000,000 350,000 350,000.00 0.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 280,000.00 5 35,000,000 350,000 350,000.00 0.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 280,000.00 6 35,000,000 350,000 350,000.00 0.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 280,000.00 7 35,000,000 350,000 350,000.00 0.00 262,500.00 17,500.00 280,000.00 2,450,000 2,450,000.00 0.00 1,837,500.00 122,500.00 1,960,000.00 Prepared by Traci Pleckham 8/18/2005 OPTION 2 SAMPLE UTILITY TAX INCENTIVE ANALYSIS ***ESTIMATED*** Annual Annual Annual Utility Tax to Property Tax Total Annual Year Utility Tax 50% Rebate the City Sales 1% Sales Tax to the City Revenue 1 262,500.00 131,250.00 131,250.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 498,750.00 2 262,500.00 131,250.00 131,250.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 498,750.00 3 262,500.00 131,250.00 131,250.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 498,750.00 4 262,500.00 131,250.00 131,250.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 498,750.00 5 262,500.00 131,250.00 131,250.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 498,750.00 6 262,500.00 131,250.00 131,250.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 498,750.00 7 262,500.00 131,250.00 131,250.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 498,750.00 1,837,500.00 918,750.00 918,750.00 2,450,000 122,500.00 3,491,250.00 OPTION 2A SAMPLE UTILITY TAX INCENTIVE ANALYSIS ***ESTIMATED*** Annual Annual Annual Utility Tax to Property Tax Total Annual Year Utility Tax 75% Rebate the City Sales 1% Sales Tax to the City Revenue 1 262,500.00 196,875.00 65,625.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 433,125.00 2 262,500.00 196,875.00 65,625.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 433,125.00 3 262,500.00 196,875.00 65,625.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 433,125.00 4 262,500.00 196,875.00 65,625.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 433,125.00 5 262,500.00 196,875.00 65,625.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 433,125.00 6 262,500.00 196,875.00 65,625.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 433,125.00 7 262,500.00 196,875.00 65,625.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 433,125.00 1,837,500.00 1,378,125.00 459,375.00 2,450,000 122,500.00 3,031,875.00 OPTION 2C SAMPLE UTILITY TAX INCENTIVE ANALYSIS ***ESTIMATED*** Annual Annual Annual Utility Tax to Property Tax Total Annual Year Utility Tax 100% Rebate the City Sales 1% Sales Tax to the City Revenue 1 262,500.00 262,500.00 0.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 367,500.00 2 262,500.00 262,500.00 0.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 367,500.00 3 262,500.00 262,500.00 0.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 367,500.00 4 262,500.00 262,500.00 0.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 367,500.00 5 262,500.00 262,500.00 0.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 367,500.00 6 262,500.00 262,500.00 0.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 367,500.00 7 262,500.00 262,500.00 0.00 35,000,000 350,000 17,500.00 367,500.00 1,837,500.00 1,837,500.00 0.00 2,450,000 122,500.00 2,572,500.00 Prepared by Traci Pleckham 8/18/2005 OPTION 3 SAMPLE SALES TAX INCENTIVE ANALYSIS ***ESTIMATED*** Annual 75% Rebate Years 1-3 Sales Tax to #Years Sales 1% Sales Tax 25% Years 4-5 the City 1 35,000,000 350,000 262,500.00 87,500.00 2 35,000,000 350,000 262,500.00 87,500.00 3 35,000,000 350,000 262,500.00 87,500.00 4 35,000,000 350,000 87,500.00 262,500.00 5 35,000,000 350,000 87,500.00 262,500.00 1,750,000 962,500.00 787,500.00 Prepared by Traci Pleckham 8/18/2005