City Council Packet 2004 05-11-04 e.. .,,.,
g,tH9 United City of Yorkville
County Seat of Kendall County
EST.% 1836
-1 800 Game Farm Road
u) Yorkville,Illinois 60560 AGENDA
Q II n \ Q Phone:630-553-4350
9 72:: Fax:630-553-7575 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
`it L E `w CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 PM
Tuesday, May 11,2004
Call to Order: 7:00 p.m.
Pledge of Allegiance:
Roll Call by Clerk: WARD I WARD II WARD III WARD IV
Rich Sticka Valerie Burd Marty Munns Joe Besco
Paul James Larry Kot Wanda Ohare Rose Ann Spears
Establishment of Quorum:
Introduction of Guests:
Amendments to Agenda:
Committee Meeting Dates:
Public Works Committee Meeting: Ad-hoc: Technology Committee
7:00 p.m., Monday, May 24, 2004 To Be Announced
City Hall Conference Room
Economic Development Committee:
7:00 p.m., Monday, May 20, 2004
City Hall Conference Room
Administration Committee Meeting:
6:30 p.m., Thursday, May 13, 2004
City Hall Conference Room
Public Safety Committee Meeting:
6:30 p.m., Thursday, May 27, 2004
City Hall Conference Room
------- ------- ------------ - -- —
— ------------- -- - ----------------------
Public Hearings:
1. Fox Hill Special Service Area Number 2004-201
Citizen Comments:
Presentations: None
City Council Meeting Agenda
May 11, 2004
Page 2
Consent Agenda
1. Police Reports for March 2004
2. Plat of Easement for 307 & 309 Mulhern Court- authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute
3. Bruell Street Pump Station Change Order#1 -approve extension of bid contract time from 60 to 90 days
4. Bruell Street Forcemain& Sanitary Sewers Change Order#1 -approve extension of contract completion
date by 60 calendar days
5. Raintree Village - ComEd Easements - authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute
6. 2004 Crack Filling MFT Appropriation Resolution - authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
7. Bristol Ridge Road Reconstruction- award contract to Aurora Blacktop in an amount not to exceed
$1,435,017.08
8. Water Department Report for February 2004
9. Route 47 Watermain award contract to Neslund&Associates in an amount not to exceed$737,021.15
10. Pollution Control Ordinance - authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute
11. Ordinance Banning Depositing of Snow in the Street - authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute
12. Game Farm Road & Somonauk Roadway Improvements - approve Smith Engineering Consultants to
perform Phase 1 Engineering Services and authorize Mayor, City Clerk and City Engineer to execute
MFT Resolution
13. USGS Joint Funding Agreements to Survey Channel Crossing from Blackberry Creek - authorize Mayor
and City Clerk to execute
14. Sewer Vacuum Truck- approve purchase from EJ Equipment in an amount not to exceed$220,375
15. Ordinance Amending Liquor Sampling Ordinance - authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute
16. Digital Recording of Interview Room - approve purchase of Thomas Alarm equipment and installation in
an amount not to exceed$2,200
Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals:
Minutes for Approval(Corrections and Additions):
Minutes of City Council—March 23, 2004 and April 27, 2004
Minutes of Committee of the Whole—October 21, 2003, April 20, 2004, and April 27, 2004
City Council Meeting Agenda
May 11, 2004
Page 3
Bill payments for approval from the current Bill List (Corrections and Additions):
Checks total these amounts:
$ 507,121.98 (vendors)
$ 127,705.55 (payroll period ending 4/17/04)
$ 634,827.53 (total)
Reports:
Mayor's Report:
1. Swearing-in of K-9 Sammy
2. Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Officer Barry Groesch
3. Proclamation for Poppy Awareness Days
4. Proclamation Supporting Click It or Ticket/Operation ABC (America Buckles Up Children)
5. Reappointment of Department Heads
6. Reappointments to Committees/Commissions
7. Schoppe Design Associates Amendment to Professional Services Agreement
8. Ethics Ordinance
9. 2003-2004 Tax Levy Adjustment
Attorney's Report:
City Clerk's Report:
1. MFT Audit Report No. 55 for January 1, 2003 - December 31, 2003
2. Reappointment of Deputy Clerk
City Treasurer's Report:
City Administrator's Report:
Finance Director's Report:
Director of Public Works Report:
Chief of Police Report:
Executive Director of Parks & Recreation Report:
Community& Liaison Report:
Committee Reports:
Public Works Committee Report:
1. Bruell Street Lift Station- Main Street Overlay
City Council Meeting Agenda
May 11, 2004
Page 4
Committee Reports (con't):
Economic Development Committee Report:
1. No Report.
Public Safety Committee Report:
1. No Report.
Administration Committee Report:
1. No Report.
Additional Business:
Executive Session:
1. The purchase or lease of real property for the use of the public body, including meetings held for the purpose
of discussing whether a particular parcel should be acquired.
2. The appointment, employment, compensation, discipline, performance, or dismissal of specific employees of
the public body or legal counsel for the public body, including hearing testimony on a complaint lodged
against an employee of the public body or against legal counsel for the public body to determine its validity.
Adjournment:
COMMIT LEES, MEMBERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES F/Y 2003 —2004
PUBLIC WORKS
Committee Departments Liaisons
Chairman: Alderman Besco Water and Sewer Park Board
Vice-Chair: Alderman Munns Streets and Alleys YBSD
Committee: Alderman Sticka Sanitation and Waste
Committee: Alderman Kot
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
-------------_____=--- --------- ---- -- ------- ----- -- ---------------
Committee Departments Liaisons
Chairman: Alderman Sticka Planning& Building&Zoning Chamber of Commerce
Vice Chair: Alderwoman Burd Business& Economic Dev. Kendall County Econ. Dev.
Committee: Alderwoman Ohare Plan Commission
Committee: Alderman Besco Bristol Plan Commission
Yorkville Econ. Dev. Corp.
Aurora Area Convention&
Tourism Council
Downtown Re-development
City Council Meeting Agenda
May 11, 2004
Page 5
COMMITTEES, MEMBERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES F/Y 2003 —2004 (con't)
1UBLIC SAFET Y_
Committee — — Departments Liaisons
Chairman: Alderman Kot Police Human Resource Comm.
Vice Chair: Alderwoman Ohare Schools School District
Committee: Alderwoman Spears Public Relations KenCom
Committee: Alderman James
ADMINISTRATION
------- ---------- — -------- ---- ------------ ---
Committee Departments Liaisons
Chairman: Alderwoman Spears Finance Metra
Vice Chair: Alderman James Public Properties Library
Committee: Alderwoman Burd Personnel Cable Consortium
Committee: Alderman Munns
AD-HOC: TECHNOLOGY'
Committee _-� — ----- --- — ---------- -- ----
Chairman: Alderman Munns
Vice Chair: Alderman Kot
Committee: Alderman Sticka
Committee: Alderwoman Ohare
Revised: 5/4/04
AMENDED PUBLICATION OF
NOTICE OF HEARING
UNITED CITY OF YOKVILLE
SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER 2004-201
FOX HILL SUBDIVISION
NOTICE IS HEREBVY GIVEN that on May 11, 2004 at 7:00 p.m. at the Yorkville City
Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, a hearing will be held by the City of Yorkville to
consider forming a special service area, to be called "City of Yorkville Special Service Area
Number 2004-201 Fox Hill Subdivision," consisting of the territory legally described in Exhibit
"A"to this Notice.
The approximate street location is the area generally depicted on the map of a portion of
the City, which map is attached as Exhibit "B" to this Notice.
The general purpose of the formation of the City of Yorkville Special Service Area
Number 2004-201 Fox Hill Subdivision is to provide special municipal services to the area
which may include: mowing, trimming, mulching, weeding, monument repairs, trail
maintenance, beautification, snow removal, equipment and materials necessary for the
maintenance thereof, public parks, park improvements and bicycle paths, landscaping, general
maintenance and other eligible costs.
There will also be considered at the hearing the method of financing the proposed special
service area which consists of a Two Hundred Eighty-three and 46/100 Dollars($283.46)tax
by the City to each unit located in the proposed special service area. The amount of tax is
sufficient to produce revenues to provide special municipal services to the proposed special
service area as evidenced in the attached Exhibit "C".
At the hearing, all interested persons affected by the formation of such special service
area, including all persons owning taxable real estate therein, may file written objections to an be
heard orally regarding the formation of and the boundaries of the special service area, the
issuance of bonds and the levy of taxes affecting the area. The hearing may be adjourned by the
City Council without further notice other than a motion to be entered upon the minutes of its
meeting fixing the time and place of its adjournment.
If a petition signed by at least 51%of the electors residing within the City of Yorkville
Special Service Area Number 2004-201 Fox Hill Subdivision and by at least 51% Of the owners
of record of the land included within the boundaries of the City of Yorkville Special Service
Area Number 2004-201 Fox Hill Subdivision is filed with the City Clerk of the City of Yorkville
within 60 days following the final adjournment of the public hearing objecting the creation of the
special service area, the issuance of bonds for the provision of special services to the area or the
levy of taxes affecting the area, no such area may be created and no such bonds may be issued or
taxes levied or imposed.
iL
Fox Hill SSA Legal Description
That part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 19, Township 37 North, Range 7 East of
the Third Principal Meridian, and that part of the North one-half of Section 30, Township
37 North, Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian, described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Fox Hill Unit Four, thence North 0°41'57"West a
distance of 615.20 feet; thence North 80°41'57" West a distance of 110 feet; thence
North 33°48'01" East a distance of 436.27 feet; thence North 83°30'31" East a distance
of 230.19 feet; thence South 51°44'23" East a distance of 206.38 feet to a point on the
west right-of-way line of John Street; thence northeasterly along the right-of-way line of
John Street, said line being a curve to the right with a chord bearing of North 40°54'57"
East and a radius of 580.00 feet, an arc distance of 690.88 feet; thence North 3°21'28"
West a distance of 152.06 feet; thence South 75°20'57" West a distance of 84.13 feet;
thence North 57°04'26" West a distance of 153.41 feet; thence North 8°01'49" West a
distance of 188.86 feet; thence North 59°25'25" East a distance of 189.88 feet; thence
North 39°54'28" East a distance of 179.25 feet; thence North 13°03'54" East a distance
of 201.45 feet to a point on the south right-of-way line of U.S. Route 34; thence South
83°37'42" East along the right-of-way line of U.S. Route 34 a distance of 65.00 feet;
thence easterly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 34,427.48 feet, an arc
line of Diehl Farm Road;
distance of 647.88 feet to a point on the east right-of-way ,
thence South 5°21'36" West along the right-of-way line of Diehl Farm Road a distance
of 119.93 feet; thence southerly along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of
360.00 feet, an arc distance of 184.99 feet; thence South 24°04'54" East a distance of
226.66 feet; thence southerly along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 440.00
feet, an arc distance of 165.26 feet; thence South 2°33'42" East a distance of 121.43 feet
to a point on the north right-of-way line of John Street; thence easterly along the right-of-
way line of John Street, said line being a curve to the left with a chord bearing of North
86°03'32" East and a radius of 1960.00 feet, an arc distance of 14.36 feet; thence North
85°50'56" East a distance of 384.53 feet; thence easterly along a tangential curve to the
right with a radius of 2040.00 feet, an arc distance of 578.78 feet; thence South
76°46'17" East a distance of 80.02 feet to a point on the east right-of-way line of
Sycamore Road; thence South 14°21'08" West a distance of 130.40 feet; thence southerly
along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 510.00 feet, an arc distance of 199.13
feet; thence South 8°01'10" East a distance of 347.78 feet; thence southerly along a
tangential curve to the right with a radius of 590.00 feet, an arc distance of 128.33 feet;
thence South 4°26'36" West a distance of 100.00 feet to the southeast corner of Fox Hill
Unit Two; thence North 85°33'24" West a distance of 842.50 feet to a point on the
boundary of Fox Hill Unit One; thence North 85°33'24" West a distance of 976.60 feet
to a point on the boundary of Fox Hill Unit Four; thence South 0°12'34" East a distance
of 861.53 feet to the southeast corner of Fox Hill Unit Four; thence North 80°41'57"
West a distance of 1207.52 feet to the Point of Beginning, all within the United City of
Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, and containing 89.64 acres, more or less.
5/3/04
1 Exhioit 3
, , ,, , ,,, ,,r, , , , ,, ,, , , ,, ,,,, , , ,, , „ ,,„„, ,... ,,,,, ,, , , , „ „ , „ , "t ' . Ps
11 I. I- ox LL eca . Sov ' A , ea .,..i‘ii
'I I I: I.h I:.. o-I I - I' I'. 1'! I I r I n I I It II II I I. II`I I -1 p I . I I . I'1 I: I r 1' ,.I I' ,11I:II
, Ilii
II
I
i.
i lb
l;
"IP
,I LI
il.
1.
. MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRRNIBRssft- : _ IIIIIIIIIIIB :
III
p.
���',�S 11\111111 111/ ��elf�I ---�+=��
.ten,,, r. /i 3 ~—�'
'�r '�° Hlltllill �` �''‘ III
:
. Wall
i IS rilkill= i a 1,
,,
• .
,,,
, , „
. , .,.
. ,
1 / • 0 1,
11/ aim UM
, ti.is f'! l MN �oHNsm„,
' ohm imp ag,aa an--10. di•• Era WWII OEM
, ,,''' 4111004 WO,ite a ir' 41110 14:41"trk41141111111 111111V46gIV
1/A 11114:BIB ril zglit Sall
III
I
III MI laig R Es Ell l'
. IN mriallivim „,
a►► ►�1 i i1;
..,., SSA Boundary
Scale) 1 In.=880 ft.
Mill
I
May 3, 2004
II.
P x I , , ., ;. , I I ,r I— g I. P I'I I, :. .I I_I „I.I, , I. 1-. ../, ,:, ,,I I., I.I I , I I ..I I r I. r 1'' i.;, u I.; ,.I II rI IN .
t
[-Xdk:i b t+ - .
21-Jul-03 FOX HILL SSA WORKSHEET
rev.1/8/04
rev.4/27/04
Item Unit Quantity Price Cost
Mowing AC 5.29 $50.00 $7,406.00
Trimming EA 14 $250.00 $3,500.00
Mulching LS 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00
Weeding EA 4 $250.00 $1,000.00
Monument repairs LS 1 $100.00 $100.00
General Maintenance LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
Beautification LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
Snow Removal LS 1 $500.00 $500.00
based on 28 cuttings per season sub total $18,506.00
Trail Maintenance SF 66424 $3.00 $199,272.00
sub total $217,778.00
2% Contingency $4,355.56
Grand Total $222,133.56
Mowing Maintenance Breakdown Trail Maintenance Breakdown Contingency Breakdown
5 yr. maintlreplacementirepair
Total Cost $199,272.00
Yearly Maintenance Cost $18,506.00 Divided by 5 years $39,854.40 2% Contingency $4,283.56
Divided by 221 Units $83.74 Divided by 221 Units $180.34 Divided by 221 Units $19.38
Total Yearly Cost Per Unit $283.46
05/05/2004 13: 12 630553437777 CITYHOFOYORKVILLE PAGE 02
... ...............
ORDINANCE NO. 04—
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Snow Deposits on Streets
WHEREAS, after careful consideration by the Mayor and City Council it
has been determined that snow deposited onto City streets from residents driveways and
sidewalks has become a serious problem; and
WHEREAS, the snow deposited back onto the streets becomes packed by
traffic and subsequently becomes a traffic safety issue in that if the packed snow on the
streets does not melt, it can become a problem during the next City snow removal; and
NOW THEREFORE, the Mayor and City Council of the UNITED CITY
OF YORKVILLE, upon motion duly made, seconded, and approved, hereby ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1: DEPOSITS ON STREETS, SIDEWALKS:
Section of the Code of Ordinances shall be amended to add the following:
1. It shall be unlawful to deposit snow on to the streets while removing
snow from driveways and sidewalks,
2. Violation of this Ordinance shall result in a Fifty Dollar ($50.00) fine
per occurrence.
3. Any United City of Yorkville inspector, employee, officer a citizen
observing a violation of said ordinance may file a complaint by
notifying the United City of Yorkville Police Department.
05/05/2004 13: 12 630553437777 CI TYHDFOYORKV ILLE PAGE 03
SEVERABILITY: The various parts, sections, and clauses of this
Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
If any part, sentence, paragraph, section, or
clause is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid
by a court of competent jurisdiction, the
remainder of the Ordinance shall not be affected
thereby.
REPEALER: Any Ordinances or parts thereof in conflict with the
provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to
the extent of such conflict.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect 15
days from and after its passage and approval by the
Mayor and City Council,
TN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Ordinance has been enacted this day of
, 2004
PAUL JAMES MARTY MUNNS
RICHARD STICKA WANDA O'HARE
VALERIE BURP ROSE SPEARS
LARRY KOT JOSEPH BESCO
APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall
County, Illinois, this day of , 2004.
Mayor
PASSED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall
County, Illinois this day of , 2004.
City Clerk
This Document Prepared by:
Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer
1107A South Bridge Street
Yorkville,IL 60560
630-553-9500
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF DRAFT
THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS,
HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS,800 GAME FARM ROAD
ON TUESDAY,MARCH 23,2004.
Mayor Prochaska called the meeting to order at 7:03 P.M and led the Council in the Pledge of
Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Clerk Milschewski called the roll.
Ward I James Present
Sticka Present
Ward II Burd Absent
Kot Present
Ward III Munns Present
Ohare Absent
Ward IV Besco Present
Spears Present
Also present: City Clerk Milschewski,Administrator Graff,City Attorney Kelly Kramer,Police
Chief Martin,Director of Public Works Dhuse,Finance Director Pleckham and Executive
Director of Parks&Recreation Brown
QUORUM
A quorum was established.
INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS
Mayor Prochaska welcomed guests and asked those present to enter their name on the attendance
sheet provided.
AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
Mayor Prochaska stated that there would not be an executive session this evening.
COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Public Works Committee 7:00 P.M.,Monday,April 26,2004
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Economic Development Committee 7:00 P.M.,Monday,April 19,2004
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Administration Committee 7:00 P.M.,Thursday,April 8,2004
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Public Safety Committee 6:30 P.M.,Thursday,March 25,2004
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Ad Hoc Technology Committee To Be Announced
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to go into public hearing for the purpose of discussing the
Jean Dresden and DCI-Charrington,Inc.petitioners,request to amend their Annexation and
Planned Unit Development Agreement in regards to rezoning from United City of Yorkville B-3
Service Business District and R-2 One-Family Residence District to United City of Yorkville B-3
Service Business District and R-4 General Residence District. The real property consists of
approximately 34.25 acres located at the southeast corner of Route 34 and Eldamain Road on the
west side of Rob Roy Creek,in the United City of Yorkville,Bristol Township,Kendall County,
Illinois and to discuss Special Service Areas 2004-103 North Grande Reserve,2004-104 Central
Grande Reserve,2004-105 South Grande Reserve and 2004-106 Total Grande Reserve. So
moved by Alderman Sticka;seconded by Alderman Besco.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
Besco-aye,James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye,Spears-aye,Sticka-aye
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—March 23,2004-page 2
Fox Hill/Jean Dresden and DCI-Charrington,Inc.
Please see attached Report of Proceedings taken before Chris Visla,C.S.R.from Depo Court
Reporting Service for the transcription of this portion of the public hearing.
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to close this portion of the public hearing.So moved by
Alderwoman Spears;seconded by Alderman Sticka.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye,Spears-aye,Sticka-aye,Besco-aye
SSA Number 2004-103 for North Grande Reserve
SSA Number 2004-104 for Central Grande Reserve
SSA Number 2004-105 for South Grande Reserve
SSA Number 2004-106 for Total Grande Reserve
Finance Director Traci Pleckham reported that this public hearing is for the taxpayer's record and
a requirement of establishing the Special Service Areas(SSA).
The floor was opened for comments from the public;there were none.
The floor was opened for questions from the City Council;there were none.
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to close the public hearing.So moved by Alderman
Besco;seconded by Alderwoman Spears.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye,Spears-aye,Sticka-aye,Besco-aye
CITIZEN COMMENTS
None
PRESENTATIONS
None
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Police Reports for January 2004
2. Resolution 2004-08—Acknowledgment and Endorsement of the Kendall County
Trails and Greenways Plan,2004-authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
3. Historical Street Name List
4. Athletic Field Reservation Fees for FY 2004-2005
5. Part-time and Seasonal Staff—Position Titles and Pay Scales
6. Ordinance 2004-17—Adopting Water Conservation Regulations for the City-
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
7. Ordinance 2004-18—Regulating Development in Floodplain Areas-authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute
8. Site Analysis of Boy Scout Property—Mike Schoppe's Scope of Services—not to
exceed$10,000.00
9. United States Geological Survey(USGS)Study of Area Groundwater—authorize
payment of Yorkville's share of additional costs not to exceed$1,860.00
10. Bruell Street Pump Station—award contract to Seagren Construction,Inc.in an
amount of$541,400.00 and notice to proceed subject to land acquisition and
easements
11.Bruell Street Forcemain and Sanitary Sewers—award contract to H.Linden&Sons
Sewer&Water in an amount not to exceed$1,511,895.00 and notice to proceed
subject to land acquisition and easements
12. South Comprehensive Plan Amendment-Mike Schoppe's Scope of Services—not to
exceed$47,500.00 and subject to approval of FY 2004-2005 Budget
13. Request for Second K-9 for Police Department
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. So moved
by Alderwoman Spears;seconded by Alderman Besco.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye,Spears-aye,Sticka-aye,Besco-aye
PLANNING COMMISSION/ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL
No report.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—March 23,2004-page 3
MINUTES FOR APPROVAL
A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting
from March 9,2004;seconded by Alderman Munns.
Motion approved by a viva voce vote.
BILLS FOR APPROVAL
A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to approve the paying of the bills listed on the
Detailed Board Report dated March 12,2004 totaling the following amounts:checks in the
amount of$1,235,997.29(vendor);$133,453.13(payroll period ending 3/10/04)for a total of
$1,369,450.42;seconded by Alderman Munns.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
Besco-aye,James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye,Spears-aye,Sticks-aye
REPORTS
MAYOR'S REPORT
Presentation of the"Saved by the Belt"Award
Mayor Prochaska reported that Jodie Chiavario recipient of the"Saved by the Belt"Award was
unable to attend the meeting but would be given her award. At the Mayor's request,Chief Martin
explained that the program,which is being promoted by the Illinois Department of
Transportation,awards individuals for escaping serious harm during an automobile accident
because they were wearing their seat belt.
School Site Study
Mayor Prochaska reported that the Council was given copies of City Planner Mike Schoppe's
School Site Study which will be presented at the April 14,2004 Plan Commission meeting. He
suggested that the Council review the document and attend the meeting if they have any
questions. He also invited the School District and School Board to attend.
Update on Post Office Site Location
Mayor Prochaska read a letter he received from Bryant Schroeder,Real Estate Specialist with the
United States Post Office(see attached)which indicated that the Post Office has narrowed the
location down to both the northeast corner and the southwest corner of McHugh Road and
Countryside Parkway. Mayor Prochaska noted that there were several other locations that were
offered to the Post Office but not accepted such between Van Emmon Street and Hydraulic
Street,east of Route 47. He indicated that after residents expressed the concern that the Post
Office stay in the downtown,the Van Emmon Street site was discussed by the City Council at an
executive session. The Council had the staff approach landowners in the area regarding the sale
of their property for the Post Office site. Mayor Prochaska also noted that the Council has thirty
days to give written testimony and he asked that if the Council wants to discuss this further to let
him know so it can be placed on the Committee of the Whole agenda.
ATTORNEY'S REPORT
No report.
CITY CLERK'S REPORT
No report.
CITY TREASURER'S REPORT
No report.
CITY ADMINISTATOR'S REPORT
No report.
FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No report.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT
No report.
CHIEF OF POLICE REPORT
No report.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF PARKS&RECREATION REPORT
City Golf Outing
Executive Director of Parks&Recreation Laura Brown reminded that Council of the May 7,
2004 City golf outing. She stated that golfers were still being accepted for the event and she
indicated that this year's sponsorship has exceeded last year's.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—March 23,2004-pave 4
Volunteer Appreciation Event
Ms.Brown reminded the Council that the Mayor will be hosting a Volunteer Appreciation Event
on May 1,2004 at the Riverfront Park.
COMMUNITY&LIAISON REPORT
Park Board Meeting
Mayor Prochaska reported that he attended the Park Board meeting on March 22,2004 where
they recommended an"Exemplary Employee Program"be instituted for the Parks&Recreation
Department. They asked if the Council would be interested in making the program citywide.
Mayor Prochaska asked that this item be placed on the Administration Committee meeting
agenda for further discussion. He also noted that they voted to move forward with the Country
Hills Park and the Riverfront Park Shelter this summer. These items will come before the
Council for approval.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT
No report.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
No report.
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT
No report.
ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT
No report.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Senior Services Associates,Inc Fund Raiser
Alderwoman Spears noted that the Council received information regarding the Senior Service
Associates,Inc.13`'Annual Dinner/Auction on April 30,2004.She requested the United City of
Yorkville become a sponsor. Mayor Prochaska indicated that the City has been a sponsor in the
past at the$250.00 Corporate and Individual Donor level. Alderwoman Spears recommended
that the City become a donor at the$1,500.00 level as is done with other organizations.
Alderman Munns commented that this was a good cause but he did not know if the City needed to
donate$1,500.00. Alderwoman Spears inquired about donations to other organizations and
Mayor Prochaska stated most donations are$50.00 to$100.00. Alderwoman Spears stated she
was recommending the$1,500.00 donation to show the City's support to other area chairmen
such as Representative Hastert. She stated that if the City jumped on the band wagon,others
local municipalities might match the donation. She asked if any of the other Council members
were interested in increasing the amount. Alderman Sticka commented that this would be using
taxpayer's dollars. Alderwoman Spears stated that the funds were going back to the seniors.
Alderman Munns stated that increasing the donation sets a precedent;if you give one group
$1,500.00 everyone will want it. There were no other comments from Council members.
Alderwoman Spears stated that if this was the general consensus of the Council,she would have
to go with it however she was not pleased.
In-town Road Program
Alderman Besco reported that the Public Works Committee asked the City Engineer to give an
update on the in-town road program which will be presented at the next Committee of the Whole
meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to adjourn. So moved by Alderman Besco;seconded by
Alderman Munns.
Motion approved by a viva voce vote.
Meeting adjourned at 7:40 P.M.
Minutes submitted by:
Jacquelyn Milschewski,
City Clerk City of Yorkville,Illinois
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE , ILLINOIS
REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had at the meeting
of the above-entitled matter taken before
CHRISTINE M . VITOSH, C . S . R . , R . P . R . , on March 23 ,
2004 , at the hour of 7 : 00 p . m. , at 800 Game Farm
Road, in the City of Yorkville, Illinois .
D- 699604
i
REPO 0 COURT
reporting service
800 West Fifth Avenue • Suite 203C • Naperville, IL 60563 • 630-983-0030 • Fax 630-983-6013
www.depocourt.com
2
1 PRESENT :
2 MR . ARTHUR PROCHASKA, Chairman;
3 MR . JOSEPH BESCO, Alderman;
4 MR. JAMES STICKA, Alderman ;
5 MR . LARRY KOT, Alderman;
6 MR . PAUL JAMES , Alderman;
7 MS . ROSE ANN SPEARS , Alderwoman;
8 MR . MARTY MUNNS , Alderman;
9 MS . JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI , City Clerk .
10
11
12 APPEARANCES :
13 LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL J. KRAMER
1107A Bridge Street
14 Yorkville , Illinois 60560
BY : MS . KELLY KRAMER,
15 appeared on behalf of the United
City of Yorkville , Illinois .
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
3
1 ( Pledge of
2 Allegiance )
3 MAYOR PROCHASKA : This evening we do
4 have public hearings . At this time I would
5 entertain a motion to go into public hearing for
6 the purpose of discussing the Jean Dresden and
7 DCI-Charrington, Inc . , petitioners , request to
8 amend their annexation and planned unit
9 development agreement in regard to rezoning from
10 United City of Yorkville B-3 service business
11 district and R-2 one-family residence district
12 to United City of Yorkville B-3 service
13 business district and R-4 general residence
14 district .
15 The real property consists of
16 approximately 34 . 25 acres located at the
17 southeast corner of Route 34 and Eldamain Road on
18 the west side of Rob Roy Creek in the United City
19 of Yorkville, Bristol Township, Kendall County,
20 Illinois .
21 And then the other part of the
22 public hearing will be for Special Service Area
23 2004 -1023 , North Grande Reserve ; 2004 -104 ,
24 Central Grande Reserve ; 2004 -105 , South Grande
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
4
1 Reserve ; 2004-106 , Total Grande Reserve .
2 MR . STICKA : So moved .
3 MR . BESCO : Second .
4 MAYOR PROCHASKA : Moved and
5 seconded . May I have roll call , please?
6 MS . MILSCHEWSKI : Besco .
7 MR . BESCO : Aye .
8 MS . MILSCHEWSKI : James .
9 MR . JAMES : Aye .
10 MS . MILSCHEWSKI : Kot .
11 MR. KOT : Aye .
12 MS . MILSCHEWSKI : Munns .
13 MR . MUNNS : Aye .
14 MS . MILSCHEWSKI : Spears .
15 MS . SPEARS : Aye .
16 MS . MILSCHEWSKI : Sticka .
17 MR . STICKA : Aye .
18 MAYOR PROCHASKA : Motion is carried .
19 We are now in public hearing .
20 I ' ll take the first item, which
21 is the request to amend the annexation and
22 planned unit development , and I ' d ask if the
23 petitioner has a representative .
24 WHEREUPON :
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
5
1 ROBERT L . GAMRATH, III ,
2 and
3 MARVIN DeLAHR,
4 testified before the City Council as follows :
5 MR . GAMRATH : Visible to everyone?
6 (No response )
7 MR . GAMRATH : Good evening . I am
8 Rob Gamrath . I represent Paul Dresden, the
9 developer of Foxhill Subdivision . Pleased to be
10 here tonight .
11 For those of you that are on
12 the EDC, I ' m sorry if this is be a little bit
13 repetitive to what you heard Thursday night , but
14 there is some important information itself that
15 bears repeating .
16 One thing I want to start off
17 with right off the bat is to correct a
18 misperception that this is in some way the
19 developer coming back in, trying to be a greedy
20 developer, and max out the site based on the plan
21 that was approved ten years ago .
22 This original plan for Unit 7 ,
23 which we refer to as Pod 7 , in the south portion
24 of Foxhill Subdivision , located along Eldamain
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
6
1 Road just south of 34 , was approved ten years
2 ago, and in that intervening period of time ,
3 there ' s been significant changes that have
4 happened that make the plan originally approved
5 no longer feasible for this particular parcel .
6 You really have two petitions
7 before you from my client . I 'm going to speak
8 tonight mainly on the petition dealing with the
9 residential portion of this particular piece of
10 property .
11 To the north, the parcel that
12 actually is at the intersection of 34 and
13 Eldamain Road, is our commercial piece .
14 The reason we have a separate
15 petition for that piece is in conjunction with
16 redesigning the southerly parcel , we are also
17 going to -- we would also like to resubdivide
18 and square off the lot line between the two
19 parcels .
20 When we do that , we will end up
21 changing some of the -- a small amount of zoning
22 that ' s on the boundary line between the two
23 properties , so that ' s the reason for our
24 request .
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
7
1 Also, when we lay out the new
2 plan and do our design, the new access road --
3 which I ' ll show you on this particular exhibit --
4 the new access road created a parcel that
5 really didn ' t -- that stood off by itself . It
6 really didn ' t make sense to just have an island
7 of residential right here , so we are asking for
8 this small piece to also be rezoned to
9 commercial .
10 With that as a backdrop, I just
11 want to provide you with a copy of a development
12 matrix .
13 Really what you are receiving
14 outlines what ' s occurred over ten years to bring,
15 us to today and this request before you .
16 The first thing, and one of the
17 primary things , is when we came back to the City
I 18 in 2001 for approval of our preliminary plat , we
19 started to go through the process , and we were
20 just about scheduled for consideration of the
21 final plat for the residential portion , and at
22 that time we were informed that the City was in
23 the process of mapping the floodway for Rob Roy
24 Creek and that we were asked to consider the
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
8
1 potential floodplain and its impact on this
2 development , even though it had been previously
3 approved .
4 When we had -- When that was
5 considered, we lost four single-family lots , but
6 we did go back and reengineer the site, trying to
7 take into consideration this floodplain that was
8 now being mapped .
9 We went through, reengineered
10 the site , spent -- you see it there , we lost four
11 single-family lots and also spent about $ 95 , 000
12 to reengineer the site , got again scheduled
13 for -- to come in for approval of a new
14 single-family plan, and in the interim period of
15 time a Lakewood development to the west of
16 Eldamain Road was approved in Plano, and as a
17 result of that development , the access point from
18 the Lakewood Homes development on the west side
19 of Eldamain was going to be fixed at a point
20 about 200 feet south of where we had originally
21 designated to enter into our site, and we were
22 asked again by the City to consider locating the
23 access point -- for good planning reasons , to
24 locating the access point across , directly
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
9
1 across , from the development in Plano .
2 When we did that , we lost six
3 more single-family lots . We reengineered the
4 site at a cost of $ 65 , 000 .
5 We also had to expand this
6 entryway because now we were trying to get an
7 entry into our site that matched up with the
8 level of intensity for the entryway on the other
9 side of Eldamain Road . That increased cost was
10 about $25 , 000 . So now we ' ve got about a 75 --
11 78-foot wide entryway into our site .
12 Beyond just the economic
13 impact , by losing the lots and with the
14 redevelopment and the reconfiguration and the
15 uses in this area , single-family really just no
16 longer makes sense here . You really have a
17 commercial node developing at 34 and Eldamain
18 Road .
19 Our commercial piece , you have
20 a large commercial parcel , I think it ' s about 75
21 acres that ' s designated as commercial in Plano
22 adjacent to our site .
23 Your comprehensive plan
24 considers the northeast corner commercial here ,
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
10
1 and when you look at what you ' ve done
2 consistently throughout your city, that ' s one of
3 the planning techniques that you have used, is to
4 have multi-family adjacent to commercial .
5 The other thing that calls
6 for -- other reason that multi-family makes sense
7 here is Eldamain Road here as you know has been
8 turned over to the County and is expected to be
9 widened as an arterial roadway .
10 We will also have considerably
11 more traffic in the future if the bridge is put
12 over the river . That ' s going to become a
13 thoroughfare .
14 Again, your typical planning in
15 the city has been to locate multi-family closer
16 to more of your thoroughfares .
17 I will note that we worked very
18 closely with your City staff and with the City
19 trying to develop a plan that gave a nice
20 balance between the amount of density here and
21 also took into account what the City was trying
22 to achieve .
23 We are not trying to max out
24 the R-4 zoning . If we were trying to max out the
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
11
1 R-4 zoning, we would call for 96 units . We are
2 asking for 74 units under the R-4 zoning, which
3 is significantly less than what that category
4 would call for, that particular zoning
5 designation .
6 With that said, I ' ll have
7 Marvin DeLahr just fill you in on the balance of
8 the site plan, and then we ' d be happy to take any
9 questions .
10 MR . DeLAHR : Just one quick
11 correction . There is 72 units , not 74 .
12 And as you can tell on the
13 layout here , we are just trying to get a simple
14 layout that ' s going to be aesthetically
15 pleasing .
16 There was some talk about the
17 proximity to existing houses over in the Foxhill
18 Subdivision, and these are drawn in over here ,
19 and as you can see, there is only about six homes
20 that are going to be anywhere in the vicinity of
21 this property .
22 The homes out there , the people
23 had said that they had paid a premium for the
24 lots for the green space behind them, and that
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
12
1 was not charged by the developer .
2 The developer sold the lots to
3 the builder, the builder turned around and sold
4 the lots to the individual home builders -- or
5 home owners , and the people will still have the
6 green area . As a matter of fact, they will have
7 more than what they had before .
8 In our original plan, the homes
9 came all the way over to this darker green area
10 in here , so it ' s moved them out further away, we
11 have the detention area here , this is the
12 detention area over on this side .
13 There is a heavily wooded area
14 along the creek, and some of the Aldermen have
15 gone out there and took a look at it, and even
16 without the leaves on the trees out there , it ' s
17 hard to see through it .
18 And there was concern about
19 lights and things like that , and we don ' t feel
20 that ' s going to be a problem at all .
21 And there is an elevation
22 difference , these homes over here sit higher
23 than these over here will be . That ' s pretty
24 much our whole design plan . If there is any
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
13
1 questions .
2 MAYOR PROCHASKA : At this time I
3 would open the floor to anyone who would like to
4 ask questions or have comments .
5 Please come forward and address
6 the Council . Give your name and address , please .
7 WHEREUPON :
8 DAVID WILLIAMS ,
9 testified before the City Council as follows :
10 MR . WILLIAMS : Hi . David Williams ,
11 1307 Willoway . I was before the Plan Commission
12 and submitted a petition somewhat being opposed
13 to this . Not what somewhat , we are opposed to
14 it .
15 I guess tonight I am the last
16 man standing . I don ' t know why no one else is
17 not here from our subdivision .
18 But as far as that being
19 heavily wooded and not being able to see through
20 there , I can tell you right now I can set out my
21 window, look out any of my windows , and that ' s
22 not so heavily wooded that you -- I can see every
23 bulldozer , I can see every car on Route 34 , so
24 that ' s -- that ' s not the case .
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
14
1 And when I bought my house , I
2 was one of the homeowners that did pay a premium
3 not only for the open space and the creek behind
4 us , because I was looking for an area where
5 someone wouldn ' t be able to build right behind
6 me .
7 I also checked out the zoning
8 on the other side and realized that it was
9 single-family .
10 If that hadn ' t been the case , I
I1 don ' t think I would be standing here right now
12 and I wouldn ' t have a complaint , but it was
13 already zoned that way, so I was not opposed to
14 paying a premium for that lot .
15 I ' ve heard all the pros and
16 cons of this , I had an opportunity to talk to Joe
17 Dwyer .
my opinion,18 In o inion I don ' t believe
19 that this -- there is a hardship here . I don ' t
20 think there is anything quite unique about this
21 that constitutes a zoning change .
22 I believe that Mr . Dresden can
23 make a reasonable return on the existing zoning
24 even if he has to give up four or five
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
15
1 single-family lots or whatever .
2 As for all the money they spent
3 in rezoning and grounds , well , that ' s part of
4 doing business .
5 And I also happened to look at
6 the Kendall County real estate transactions on
7 February 9th to -- February 2nd through February
8 9th, and in there was 13 . 72 acres at Route 34
9 and Eldamain Road, Yorkville , owned by Jean
10 Dresden, sold to DCI-Charrington Trust Fund for
11 $ 800 , 000 .
12 Well , I believe that someone in
13 his firm believed that they could make a
14 reasonable return off that property as it exists
15 or they would not have purchased that , or they at
16 least would have asked for a contingency as to
17 whether this will be rezoned, so I guess I don ' t
18 have a lot more to say .
19 You all have -- know
20 everything I know about this , and again I will
21 reiterate that I don ' t believe that this
22 constitutes a hardship and that Mr . Dresden
23 cannot make a reasonable return under the
24 existing zoning . Thank you .
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
16
1 MAYOR PROCHASKA : Thank you,
2 Mr . Williams .
3 Is there anyone else that would
4 like to approach the Council?
5 (No response )
6 MAYOR PROCHASKA : Does anyone on the
7 Council have any questions for the developer?
8 And again , it ' s not our turn to make comments .
9 You can ask questions if you have a question .
10 MR . JAMES : I was just curious on
11 the buffer zone . From the homes to the creek,
12 what ' s the distance and then from the creek to
13 the other -- the new development what ' s the
14 distance?
15 MR . GAMRATH : I don ' t know that --
16 and maybe Marvin, you can help me with this . I
17 know that the full distance from the closest
18 point of the multi-family to the closest home is
19 600 feet .
20 MAYOR PROCHASKA : Any questions ?
21 MR. MUNNS : And that whole area is
22 34 acres , right , from the dark over? Is that the
23 whole -- Is that that 34 acres ? That ' s the whole
24 project?
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
17
1 MR . DeLAHR : No . 34 acres
2 encompasses the multi-family area and the
3 commercial .
4 MR . MUNNS : And the top part , okay .
5 You said there is 72 , so --
6 MR. DeLAHR: Yes .
7 MR . MUNNS : -- that ' s six units per
8 12 , is that --
9 MR . DeLAHR : Yes .
10 MR . MUNNS : Is that six townhomes
11 or --
12 MR . DeLAHR : Yes . There is six
13 units in 12 buildings .
14 MR . MUNNS : Okay . Thanks .
15 MR . DeLAHR : There is I believe it ' s
16 twenty and a half acres on the north parcel and
17 then the remainder to the south .
18 MR . MUNNS : Okay . That ' s all
19 included in that . Okay .
20 MR . KOT : Do you have a rendering of
21 what these are going to look like?
22 MR . GAMRATH : At this point in time ,
23 no . We have only come through with the zoning
24 request .
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
18
1 At the Economic Development
2 Committee meeting, it was raised whether we would
3 consider some architectural standards , and I can
4 report that we are willing to consider
5 architectural standards subject to seeing what
6 the City ' s position is for those standards .
7 We ' d be happy to discuss those further with the
8 City .
9 MR. JAMES : Is there any discussion
10 about some kind of landscape buffer back there?
11 MR. GAMRATH : Well -- And, Marvin,
12 you may be able to elaborate a little bit -- but
13 there will be -- it doesn ' t show on this plan ,
14 but there will be buffers around all of these
15 buildings .
16 We have also committed -- Based
17 on the Economic Development Committee meeting
18 last week, we have committed to also installing a
19 buffer along this south property line to buffer
20 the development from the property directly to our
21 south .
22 We haven ' t developed exactly
23 what that buffer will look like, but we are
24 willing to work with the City on that .
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
19
1 MR . JAMES : So there is existing
2 trees that are there right now that basically is
3 giving the buffering and then you plan on to do
4 some more landscaping --
5 MR . GAMRATH : Yes .
6 MR . JAMES : -- and adding
7 additional buffering?
8 MR . GAMRATH : Yes .
9 MR. STICKA: I don ' t remember what
10 the landscape plan calls for in the rear of
11 something like this . I don ' t believe it calls
12 for anything .
13 MAYOR PROCHASKA : It would be --
14 There are standards that we have that the
15 City -- when you have two different types of
16 zoning abut , so there will be requirements just
17 because you have R-4 zoning abutting R-2 zoning,
18 so that in itself, there is certain landscape
19 requirements .
20 MR . STICKA : It doesn ' t actually
21 abut it --
22 MAYOR PROCHASKA : Well , the
23 zoning -- No . Yeah, but it ' s the zoning . The
24 zoning parts abut .
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
20
1 MR . JAMES : So would that buffering
2 be at the end of that property or right behind
3 the townhomes .
4 MAYOR PROCHASKA : I don ' t know .
5 MR. DeLAHR : Right at the end of the
6 townhomes . The end of the property is actually
7 right at the floodplain, so we won ' t be doing any
8 work in that floodplain .
9 MR . STICKA : One comment that was at
10 EDC -- I ' m sorry to make a comment -- was that
11 the existing tree line shouldn ' t be hampered .
12 Nothing should be removed from it .
13 MAYOR PROCHASKA : Any other
14 questions ?
15 (No response )
16 MAYOR PROCHASKA : Okay . If not ,
17 then I would like to move on to the next part of
18 this public hearing, which would be --
19 MR . WILLIAMS : Well , before we move
20 on, can I make a comment?
21 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Well , that ' s why I
22 asked the question, Dave . Yes .
23 MR. WILLIAMS : I just wanted to
24 point out a couple other issues . There is a four
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
21
1 and a half acre parcel behind us that Mark was
2 referring to, to the green space, and that abuts
3 both sides of that creek, and I would say that
4 the City of Yorkville probably owns 100 feet on
5 the other side of that creek with the commonlaw
6 and the green space .
7 And also, I think a year and a
8 half when Primus was going to develop this as
9 single-family under the current zoning before he
10 realized he had some floodplains , they had
11 already sold 10 or 12 lots within a month , so I
12 still find this hard to comprehend that they
13 cannot develop it and get a reasonable return in
14 single-family .
15 MAYOR PROCHASKA : Thank you ,
16 Mr . Williams .
17 We ' ll go ahead and close this
18 one? Is there any other discussion then?
19 (No response )
20 MAYOR PROCHASKA : If not , I would
21 entertain a motion to close this portion of the
22 public hearing .
23 MS . SPEARS : So moved .
24 MR . KOT : Second .
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
22
1 MAYOR PROCHASKA : Moved and
2 seconded . May I have roll call?
3 MS . MILSCHEWSKI : James .
4 MR . JAMES : Aye .
5 MS . MILSCHEWSKI : Kot .
6 MR . KOT : Aye .
7 MS . MILSCHEWSKI : Munns .
8 MR . MUNNS : Aye .
9 MS . MILSCHEWSKI : Spears .
10 MS . SPEARS : Aye .
11 MS . MILSCHEWSKI : Sticka .
12 MR . STICKA : Aye .
13 MS . MILSCHEWSKI : Besco .
14 MR . BESCO : Aye .
15 MAYOR PROCHASKA : That portion of
16 the public hearing is closed then .
17 (WHEREUPON, which
18 were all the
19 proceedings reported
20 at the aforementioned
21 date and time . )
22 ---000---
23
24
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
23
1 STATE OF ILLINOIS )
ss :
2 COUNTY OF LASALLE )
3
4 CHRISTINE M . VITOSH, being first duly
5 sworn, on oath says that she is a Certified
6 Shorthand Reporter and Registered Professional
7 Reporter doing business in the State of Illinois ;
8 That she reported in shorthand the
9 proceedings had at the foregoing meeting;
10 And that the foregoing is a true and
11 correct transcript of her shorthand notes so
12 taken as aforesaid and contains all the
13 proceedings had at the said meeting .
14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set
15 my hand this day of 2004 .
16
17
4 �y .:
18
19
CHRISTINE M . VITOSH, C . S . R .
20 CSR License No . 084 -002883
21
22
23
24
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030
City Council Meeting Multi-Page $25,000 - final
United City of Yorkville, Illinois
8:24 Beyond[1] 9:12 committed[2] 18:16,18 developed[1] 18:22
-$- account[1] 10:21 bit[2] 5:12 18:12 Committee[2] 18:2,17 developer[6] 5:9,19,20
$25,000[1] 9:10 achieve[i1 10:22 bought[i] 14:1 commonlaw[i] 21:5 12:1,2 16:7
$65,000[1] 9:4 acre[1] 21:1 boundary[1] 6:22 complaint[1] 14:12 developing[3] 9:17
$800,000[1] 15:11 acres[7] 3:16 9:21 15:8 bridge[2] 2:13 10:11 comprehend[i1 21:12 development[12] 3:9
16:22,23 17:1,16 4:22 7:11 8:2,15,17,18 9:1
$95,000[1] 8:11 bring[i1 7:14 comprehensive[i] 9:23 16:13 18:1,17,20
adding[1] 19:6
Bristol i 3:19 concern[11 12:18
difference
[i1
12:22
-0- additional[iI 19:7
buffer[5] 16:11 18:10,19 conjunction[i] 6:15
different i 19:15
address[2] 13:5,6 18:19,23 cons[i1 14:16
4- 23:20directlyz 8:2418:20
08 002883[1] [ 1
adjacent[2] 9:22 10:4 buffering[3] 19:3,7 20:1 consider[a] 7:24 8:22
_ aesthetically[1] 11:14 buffers[i1 18:14 18:3,4
discuss[1] 18:7
-1aforementioned[1] build[1] 14:5 considerably[i1 10:10 discussing[t1 3:6
100[1] 21:4 22:20 builder[2] 12:3,3 consideration[2] 7:20 discussion[2] 18:9
1107A[t] 2:13 aforesaid[1] 23:128:7 21:18
builders[1] 12:4 distance[3] 16:12,14,17
13.72[1] 15:8 again[5] 8:12,22 10:14 buildings[2] 17:13 considered[1] 8:5
1307[i1 13:11 15:20 16:8 18:15 considers[1] 9:24 district[4] 3:11,11,13,14
ago[2] 5:21 6:2 bulldozer[1] 13:23 consistently[1] 10:2 doesn't[2] 18:13 19:20
-2- agreement[11 3:9 business[4] 3:10,13 15:4 consists[1] 3:15 done[1] 10:1
200[11 8:20 ahead[i1 21:17 23:7 constitutes[21 14:21 drawn[i1 11:18
2001 [1] 7:18 Alderman[5] 2:3,4,5,6 15:22 Dresden[5] 3:6 5:8
2004[2] 1:9 23:15 2:8 -C- contains[1] 23:12 14:22 15:10,22
Aldermen[1] 12:14 contingency C i 2:12 [ ] 15:16 duly[1] 23:4
2004-1023[1] 3:23 Alderwoman[1] 2:7 Dwyer[1] 14:17
2004-104[1] 3:23 Allegiance[1] 3:2 C.S.R[2] 1:8 23:19 copy[i] 7:11
gcorner[2] 3:17 9:24 _
calls[3] 10:51 :10 11
9
2004-105[1] 3:24 along[3] 5:24 12:14 -E-
2004-106 cannot z15:2321:13correct[2] 5:17 23:11
2004 106[1] 4:1
• [ 1
m.19 correction[1] 11:11 E[4] 2:1,1,12,12
2nd[i1 15:7 amend(z1 3:8 4:21 car[i1 13:23 economic[3] 9:12 18:1
jl amount[2] 6:21 10:20 carried[i1 4:18 cost[z1 9:4,9 18:17
-3- ANN[1] 2:7 case[2] 13:24 14:10 Council[6] 1:1 5:4 13:6 EDC[2] 5:12 20:10
category[1] 11:3 13:9 16:4,7
34[9] 3:17 6:1,12 9:17 annexation[2] 3:8 4:21 County[4] 3:19 10:8 elaborate[1] 18:12
13:23 15:8 16:22,23 17:1 appeared[1] 2:15 Central[1] 3:24 15:6 23:2 Eldamain[9] 3:17 5:24
34.25[1] 3:16approach[1] 16:4 couple[1] 20:24 certain[1] 19:18 6:13 8:16,19 9:9,17 10:7
Certified[1] 23:5 15:9
approval[2] 7:18 8:13 created[11 7:4
-6- approved[5] 5:21 6:1,4 Chairman[1] 2:2 creek[8] 3:18 7:24 12:14 elevation[1] 12:21
600[1] 16:19 8:3,16 change[1] 14:21 14:3 16:11,12 21:3,5 encompasses[1] 17:2
60560[11 2:14 architectural[2] 18:3,5 changes[1] 6:3 CSR[i] 23:20 end[4] 6:20 20:2,5,6
area[101 3:22 9:15 12:6,9 changing[i] 6:21 curious[1] 16:10 enter[i] 8:21
_7_ 12:11,12,13 14:4 16:21 charged[1] 12:1 current[1] 21:9 entertain[2] 3:5 21:21
17:2 checked[1] 14:7 entry[i] 9:7
72[2] 11:11 17:5 arterial[1] 10:9 CHRISTINE[3] 1:8 -D- entryway[3] 9:6,8,11
74[2] 11:2,11 ARTHUR[1] 2:2 23:4,19
75[2] 9:10,20D-699604[1] 1:22 estate[i1 15:6
away(11 12:10 city[22] 1:1,2,10 2:9,15 evening[2] 3:3 5:7
78-foot[1] 9:11 Aye[12] 4:7,9,11,13,15 3:10,12,18 5:4 7:17,22 DANIEL[11 2:13 exactly[1] 18:22
7:00[1] 1:9 4:17 22:4,6,8,10,12,14 8:22 10:2,15,18,18,21 dark[1] 16:22
13:9 18:8,24 19:15 21:4 darker[1] 12:9 exhibit[i1 7:3
City's[1] 18:6 date 22:21 existing[s] 11:17 14:23
-8- -B- [i1 Clerk[i] 2:9 15:24 19:1 20:11
Dave[11 20:22
800[1] 1:9 B-3[2] 3:10,12 client[i1 6:7 exists[1] 15:14
D avid[z] 13:8,10
backdrop[1] 7:10 close[2] 21:17,21 expand[1] 9:5
-9- balance[2] 10:20 11:7 DCI Charrington[z1 expected[1] 10:8
closed[1] 22:16 3:7 15:10
96[i] 11:1 based[2] 5:20 18:16 closely[1] 10:18 dealing[1] 6:8
9th[2] 15:7,8 bat[i] 5:17 closer[1] 10:15 DeLahr[9] 5:3 11:7,10 -F-
bears[1] 5:15 closest[2] 16:17,18 17:1,6,9,12,15 20:5 fact[1] 12:6
-A- become[1] 10:12 coming[i] 5:19 density[1] 10:20 far[1] 13:18
behalf[i1 2:15 di
able[3] 13:19 14:5 18:12 comment[3] 20:9,10,20 design[z
] 7:2 12:24 Farm[i] 1:9
above-entitled[i1 1:7 behind el[] 11:24 14:3,5 comments[2] 13:4 16:8 designated[2] 8:21 9:21 feasible[1] 6:5
20:2 21:1 [1] 11:5 designation February abut[3] 19:16,21,24 Besco[6] 2:3 4:3,6,7 commercial[9] 6:13 7:9 g [3
] 15:7,7,7
abuts[1] 21:2 22:13,14 9:17,19,20,21,24 10:4 detention[2] 12:11,12 feet[3] 8:20 16:19 21:4
between[31 6:18,22 17:3 develop3
abutting[i1 19:17 [ 1 10:19 21:8 fill(11 11:7
Commission[i1 13:11 21:13
access[5] 7:2,4 8:17,23 10:20 final[1] 7:21
Depo Court Reporting Index Page 1
Naperville, Illinois (630) 983-0030
City Council Meeting Multi-Page"` firm - R-4
United City of Yorkville, Illinois
firm[1] 15:13 License[1] 23:20 new[5] 7:1,2,4 8:13 16:13 plan[14] 5:20,22 6:4 7:2
first[3] 4:20 7:16 23:4 -I- lights[1] 12:19 next[i] 20:17 8:14 9:23 10:19 11:8 12:8
five[1] 14:24 line[4] 6:18,22 18:19 nice[i] 10:19 12:24 13:11 18:13 19:3
III[1] 5:119:10
fixed[1] 8:1920:11 night Illinois[�] 1:2,10 2:14 locate[1] 10:15 g [1] 5:13 planned[2] 3:8 4:22
floodplain[4] 8:1,7 20:7 2:15 3:20 23:1,7 node[1] 9:17 planning[3] 8:23 10:3
20:8 impact[z] 8:1 9:13 located[z] 3:16 5:24 north[3] 3:23 6:11 17:16 10:14
floodplains[1] 21:10 important[1] 5:14 locating[2] 8:22,24 northeast[1] 9:24 Plano[3] 8:16 9:1,21
floodway[1] 7:23 Inc[1] 3:7 longer[z] 6:5 9:16 note[1] 10:17 plat[z] 7:18,21
floor[1] 13:3 included[1] 17:19 IOok[6] 10:1 12:15 13:21 notes[1] 23:11 Pleased[1] 5:9
follows[z] 5:4 13:9 increased[1] 9:9 15:5 17:21 18:23 Nothing20:12
looking 1 [1] pleasing[1] 11:15
foregoing[z] 23:9,10 individual[1] 12:4 g[ ] 14:4 now[7] 4:19 8:8 9:6,10 Pledge[1] 3:1
forward[1] 13:5 information(1] 5:14 losing[1] 9:13 13:20 14:11 19:2
four[a] 8:5,10 14:24 lost[3] 8:5,10 9:2 Pod[1] 5:23
informed[1] 7:22 - point[7] 8:17,19,23,24
20:24 lots[9] 8:5,11 9:3,13
installing[1] 18:18 11:24 12:2,4 15:1 21:11 -0- 16:18 17:22 20:24
Foxhill[3] 5:9,24 11:17 intensity[1] 9:8 oath[1] 23:5 portion[s] 5:23 6:9 7:21
full pi 16:1721:21 22:15
interim[1] 8:14 _M_ occurred[1] 7:14
Fund pi 15:10 intersection[1] 6:12 off[s] 5:16,17 6:18 7:5 position[1] 18:6
future[1] 10:11 intervening m 6:2 M[3] 1:8 23:4,19 15:14 potential[1] 8:1
island[1] 7:6 makes[2] 9:16 10:6 OFFICES[I] 2:13 preliminary[1] 7:18
-G_ issues[1] 20:24 man[1] 13:16 one[81 5:16 7:16 10:2 premium[3] 11:23 14:2
Game[1] 1:9 item[1] 4:20 mapped[1] 8:8 11:10 13:16 14:2 20:9 14:14
itself[3] 5:14 7:5 19:18 2]:18
Gamrath[9] 5:1,5,7,8 mapping[1] 7:23 pretty[1] 12:23
16:15 17:22 18:11 19:5,8 March(1i 1:8 one-family[1] 3:11 previously[1] 8:2
general[I] 3:13 _J- Mark[1] 21:1 open[z] 13:3 14:3 primary[1] 7:17
giving[1] 19:3 MARTY[1] 2:8 opinion[11 14:18 Primus[1] 21:8
J[1] 2:13
gone(1] 12:15 Marvin[41 5:3 11:7 opportunity 1 PP ty[ ] 14:16 problem[1] 12:20
JACKIE[1] 2:9 16:16 18:11 opposed[3] 13:12,13
good[z] 5:7 8:23 PP proceedings(ai 1:6
Grande[41 3:23,24,24 4:1 James[11] 2:4,6 4:8,9 matched[1] 9:7 14:13 22:19 23:9,13
16:10 18:9 19:1,6 20:1 matrix[1] 7:12 original[zi 5:22 12:8 process[2] 7:19,23
greedy[1i 5:19 22:3,4
green[s] 11:24 12:6,9 Jean[2] 3:6 15:9 matter pi 1:7 12:6 originally[2] 6:4 8:20 PROCHASKA psi 2:2
21:2,6 max[3] 5:20 10:23,24 outlines[1] 7:14 3:3 4:4,18 13:2 16:1,6,20
Joe(1] 14:16 owned[1] 15:9 19:13,22 20:4,13,16,21
JOSEPH[1] 2:3
grounds[1] 15:3 may[3] 4:5 18:12 22:2 21:15,20 22:1,15 guess[z] 13:15 15:17 MAYOR[17] 3:3 4:4,18 owners[1] 12:5 Professional[1] 23:6
13:2 16:1,6,20 19:13,22 owns[1] 21:4
_H_ -K- 20:4,13,16,21 21:15,20 project pi 16:24
KELLY[1] 2:14 22:1,15 _P_ properties[1] 6:23
half[3] 17:16 21:1,8 Kendall[2] 3:19 15:6 meeting[6] 1:1,6 18:2 property[8] 3:15 6:10
hampered[1] 20:11 18:17 23:9,13 P[3] 2:1,12,12 11:21 15:14 18:19,20 20:2
hand[i] 23:15 kind[1] 18:10 MILSCHEWSKI[13] P-11:1[11 1:9 20:6
Kot[7] 2:5 4:10,11 17:20 2:9 4:6,8,10,12,14,16 22:3 aid 11:23 pros[1] 14:15
happy[z] 11:8 18:7 21:24 22:5,6 P [1]
KRAMER[z] 2:13,14 22:5,7,9,11,13 parcel[7] 6:5,11,16 7:4 provide[1] 7:11
hard[z] 12:17 21:12 P P
hardship[2] 14:19 15:22 misperception[1] 5:18 9:20 17:16 21:1 proximity[1] 11:17
heard[z] 5:13 14:15 -L- money[1] 15:2 parcels[1] 6:19 public[7] 3:4,5,22 4:19
hearing[6] 3:5,22 4:19 month pi 21:11 part[a] 3:21 15:3 17:4 20:18 21:22 22:16
20:18 21:22 22:16 L[1] 5:1 motion[3] 3:5 4:18 21:21 20:17 purchased[1] 15:15
hearings[1] 3:4 Lakewood[z] 8:15,18 move[2] 20:17,19 particular[a] 6:5,9 7:3 purpose[1] 3:6
heavily[3] 12:13 13:19 landscape[3] 18:10 moved[s] 4:2,4 12:10 11:4 put[1] 10:11
13:22 19:10,18 21:23 22:1 parts[1] 19:24
help(1] 16:16 landscaping[11 19:4 MS[181 2:7,9,14 4:6,8,10 Paul[2] 2:6 5:8 _Q_
large[1] 9:20 4:12,14,15,16 21:23 22:3 pay(1i 14:2
hereunto[1] 23:14 22:5,7,9,10,11,13 questions[7] 11:9 13:1
LARRY pi 2:5 paying[1] 14:14
Hi[1] 13:1013:4 16:7,9,20 20:14
higher[1] 12:22 LASALLE[1] 23:2 multi-family[s] 10:4,6 people[z] 11:22 12:5 quick(1] 11:10
g 10:15 16:18 17:2 q
last[z] 13:15 18:18 per[1] 17:7 uite[1] 14:20
home[3] 12:4,5 16:18 Munns[11] 2:8 4:12,13 q
homeowners[1] 14:2 LAW[1] 2:13 16:21 17:4,7,10,14,18 period[ z] 6:2 88:14
homes[6] 8:18 11:19,22 lay[1] 7:1 22:7,8 petition[3] 6:8,15 13:12 _R_
12:8,22 16:11 layout[z] 11:13,14 petitioner[1i 4:23
hour[1] 1:9 least[1] 15:16 -N- petitioners[1] 3:7 R[z] 2:1,12
house[1] 14:1 leaves[1] 12:16 petitions[1] 6:6 R-2[2] 3:11 19:17
N[2] 2:1,12 R-4[5] 3:13 10:24 11:1,2
houses[1] 11:17 less[1] 11:3 name[1] 13:6 piece[s] 6:9,13,15 7:8 19:17
level[1] 9:8 9:19
Depo Court Reporting Index Page 2
Naperville, Illinois (630) 983-0030
City Council Meeting Multi-Pagem4 R.P.R - zoning
United City of Yorkville, Illinois
R.P.R[i] 1:8 ROBERT[1] 5:1 started[1] 7:19 up[3] 6:20 9:7 14:24
raised[i] 18:2 roll[2] 4:5 22:2 State[2] 23:1,7 used[i] 10:3
real[2] 3:15 15:6 ROSE[i] 2:7 Sticka[9] 2:4 4:2,16,17 uses[i] 9:15
realized[2] 14:8 21:10 Route[3] 3:17 13:23 15:8 19:9,20 20:9 22:11,12
really[6] 6:6 7:5,6,13 Roy[2] 3:18 7:23 still[2] 12:5 21:12 -V-
9:15,16 stood[1] 7:5
rear[i] 19:10 _S_ Street[i] 2:13 vicinity[i] 11:20
reason[3] 6:14,23 10:6 subdivision[4] 5:9,24
,24
Visible[i] 5:5
S 2 2:1 12 VITOSH 3 1:8 23:4,19
reasonable[4] 14:23 11:18 13:17 [ ]
says[1] 23:5
15:14,23 21:13 scheduled[2] 7:20 8:12 subject[ll 18:5 -w-
reasons[1] 8:23 submitted[1] 13:12
receiving[1] 7:13 Second[2] 4:3 21:24 sworn[1] 23:5 week[ll 18:18
reconfiguration[i] seconded[2] 4:5 22:2 west[3] 3:18 8:15,18
see 6 8:10 11:19 12:17
9:14 [ ] _T_ WHEREOF[1] 23:14
13:19,22,23
redesigning[i] 6:16 whole[4] 12:24 16:21,23
redevelopment[1] 9:14 seeing[i] 18:5• T[i] 2:1 16:23
reengineer[z] 8:6,12 sense[3] 7:6 9:16 10:6 techniques[i] 10:3 wide[1] 9:11
10:9
se
reengineered[z] 8:9 9:3 separate[i] 6:14 ten[3] 5:21 6:1 7:14 widened
P [i]
refer[1] 5:23 service[3] 3:10,12,22 testified[2] 5:4 13:9 Williams[7] 13:8,10,10
referring[i] 21:2 set[2] 13:20 23:14 thank[3] 15:24 16:1 16:2 20:19,23 21:16
1:15
re and[i] 3:9 shorthand[3] 23:6,8,11 willing[2] 18:4,24
g show[2] 7:3 18:13 Thanks[i] 17:14 Willoway[1] 13:11
Registered[I] 23:6 [ l
thorou hfare i 10:13
g
reiterate 15:21
side[6] 3:18 8:18 9:9 window[i] 13:21
thoroughfares[�] 10:16
remainder[i] 17:17 12.12 14.8 21:5 g windows[1] 13:21
sides[1] 21:3 through[6] 7:19 8:9 within[1] 21:11
remember[i] 19:9 12:17 13:19 15:7 17:23
significant[1] 6:3 without[ll 12:16
removed[i] 20:12 significantly[i] 11:3 throughout[�] 10:2
g Y WITNESS[I] 23:14
rendering m 17:20 Thursday[i] 5:13
simple[i] 11:13 wooded[3] 12:13 13:19
repeating[i] 5:15 today[�] 7:15
single-family[9] 8:5 13:22
repetitive[i] 5:13 8:11,14 9:3,15 14:9 15:1 tonight[3] 5:10 6:8 13:15
worked[i] 10:17
report[2] 1:6 18:4 21:9,14 took[2] 10:21 12:15
reported[2] 22:19 23:8 sit[1] 12:22 top[1] 17:4 -y-
Reporter[2] 23:6,7 site[io] 5:20 8:6,10,12,21 Total[i] 4:1
represent[1] 5:8 9:4,7,11,22 11:8 townhomes[3] 17:10 year[11 21:7
representative[1] 4:23 six[5] 9:2 11:19 17:7,10 20:3,6 years[3] 5:21 6:1 7:14
request[5] 3:7 4:21 6:24 17:12 Township[1] 3:19 Yorkville[9] 1:2,10 2:14
small[2] 6:21 7:8 2:15 3:10,12,19 15:9 21:4
7:15 17:24 traffic[�] 10:11
requirements[2] 19:16 sold[41 12:2,3 15:10 transactions[1] 15:6
19:19 21:11 transcript[1] 23:11 -Z-
Reserve[4] 3:23,24 4:1 someone[2] 14:5 15:12 tree[I] 20:11 zone[i] 16:11
4:1 somewhat[2] 13:12,13 trees[z] 12:16 19:2 zoned m 14:13
residence[2] 3:11,13 sorry[2] 5:12 20:10 true[i] 23:10 zoning[17] 6:21 10:24
residential[3] 6:9 7:7 south[7] 3:24 5:23 6:1 Trust[i] 15:10 11:1,2,4 14:7,21,23 15:24
7:21 8:20 17:17 18:19,21 17:23 19:16,17,17,23,23
response[4] 5:6 16:5 southeast[i] 3:17 trying[8] 5:19 8:6 9:6 19:24 21:9
10:19,21,23,24 11:13
20:15 21:19
southerly[i] 6:16 turn[i] 16:8
resubdivide[i] 6:17 space[4] 11:24 14:3 21:2 tamed[z] 10:8 12:3
result[1] 8:17 21:6
return[4] 14:23 15:14,23 speak[1] 6:7 twenty[i] 17:16
21:13 Spears[6] 2:7 4:14,15 two[4] 6:6,18,22 19:15
rezoned[2] 7:8 15:17 21:23 22:9,10 types[i] 19:15
rezoning[2] 3:9 15:3 Special[I] 3:22 typical[i] 10:14
right[io] 5:17 7:7 13:20 spent[3] 8:10,11 15:2
14:5,11 16:22 19:2 20:2,5 square[I] 6:18 -U-
20'7
SS[i] 23:1 under[3] 11:2 15:23 21:9
river u] 10:12 staff[11 10:18 unique[i] 14:20
road[u] 1:10 3:17 6:1,13 standards[4] 18:3,5,6 unit[3] 3:8 4:22 5:22
7:2,4 8:16 9:9,18 10:7 19:14
15:9 United[s] 1:2 2:15 3:10
roadway m 10:9 standing[2] 13:16 14:11 3:12,18
Rob[3] 3:18 5:8 7:23 start[1] 5:16 units[5] 11:1,2,11 17:7
17:13
Depo Court Reporting Index Page 3
Naperville, Illinois (630) 983-0030
MINUTES OF 1'HIt REGULAR MEETING OF 1'Hl,CITY COUNCIL OF DRAFT
THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS,
HELD IN 1'Hr.CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS,800 GAME FARM ROAD
ON TUESDAY.APRIL 27,2004.
Mayor Prochaska called the meeting to order at 9:30 P.M and led the Council in the Pledge of
Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Clerk Milschewski called the roll.
Ward I James Present
Sticka Present
Ward II Burd Absent
Kot Present
Ward III Munns Present
Ohare Absent
Ward IV Besco Present
Spears Present
Also present: City Clerk Milschewski,City Treasurer Powell,Administrator Graff,City Attorney
Kelly Kramer,Police Lieutenant Don Schwartzkopf and Executive Director of Parks&
Recreation Brown
QUORUM
A quorum was established.
INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS
Mayor Prochaska welcomed guests and asked those present to enter their name on the attendance
sheet provided.
AMENDMENTS TO 1'HL AGENDA
Mayor Prochaska asked the Council to place items#1 and#2 from the Public Works Committee
Report;item#2 from the Economic Development Committee Report and items#1 and#3 from
the Administration Committee report on the Consent Agenda.Alderwoman Spears asked that
item#2 from the Public Works Committee agenda be left on the regular agenda for a vote.
Mayor Prochaska tabled items#4(Amendment to the Schoppe Design Agreement)and#6(Fox
Hill PUD Amendment)from the Economic Development Committee Report along with item#2
(Records Disposal Service)from the Administration Committee Report.
Alderwoman Spears asked that the Ordinance Approving the 2004-2005 Fiscal Budget be tabled
because it was no discussed at that April 20,2004 Committee of the Whole(COW)meeting.
Mayor Prochaska noted that by tabling this,the City will go into its new fiscal year without a
budget. She indicated that there issues that were not addressed. Alderman Besco stated he would
like to have the full Council available for a vote. Attorney Kramer stated that the item should be
tabled when the Administration Committee Report is given.
COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Public Works Committee 7:00 P.M.,Monday,May 24,2004
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Economic Development Committee 7:00 P.M.,Monday,May 20,2004
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Administration Committee 7:00 P.M.,Thursday,May 13,2004
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Public Safety Committee 6:30 P.M.,Thursday,May 27,2004
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Ad Hoc Technology Committee 6:30 P.M.,Wednesday,May 5,2004
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
The Minutes of the Regular Meetine of the City Council—April 27,2004-page 2
PRESENTATIONS
None
CITIZEN COMMENTS
None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
PLANNING COMMISSION/ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL
Mayor Prochaska noted that the things presented to the Planning Commission were discussed
earlier in the evening at the COW meeting.
MINUTES FOR APPROVAL
A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting
from April 13,2004;seconded by Alderman James.
City Clerk Milschewski noted an error on page 6. The heading of the item regarding the final
plats for Grande Reserve incorrectly indicates that the plat for Unit 5 was approved. The heading
should read units 2,3,4,and 6.
Motion approved by a viva voce vote.
BILLS FOR APPROVAL
A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to approve the paying of the bills listed on the
Detailed Board Report dated April 17,2004 totaling the following amounts:checks in the amount
of$566,715.90(vendor);$134,458.22(payroll period ending 04/03/04)for a total of
$701,174.12;seconded by Alderman Besco.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
Besco-aye,James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye,Spears-aye,Sticka-aye
REPORTS
MAYOR'S REPORT
Coffee with the Mayor
Volunteers Appreciation Day Lunch
Mayor Prochaska reported that there were two events being held on Saturday,May 1,2004.
Coffee with the Mayor will from 9:00 to 11:00 A.M.at Carriage I Gifts and the Volunteer
Appreciation Day Lunch will be at the Riverfront Park from 12:30 to 3:30 P.M. He invited all
resident of Yorkville who volunteer their time to any cause to join him at the lunch.
Resolution 2004-10 Informed Emergency Response Grant
Mayor Prochaska reported that the City Council approval was needed in order to apply for the
Informed Emergency Response Grant. Attorney Kramer stated that Kendall County will be
applying for the grant. She explained that the Yorkville Police Department is supporting a co-
operative effort between the Yorkville,Plano,Oswego and the Kendall County Police
Departments because the Yorkville Police Department is seeking to implement the technology
into its department. There is no cost at this point for the United City of Yorkville.
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve the resolution of support and endorsement of
the grant for the Informed Emergency Response,LLC Computer Software System for the United
City of Yorkville Police Department. So moved by Alderman Kot;seconded by Alderwoman
Spears.
Alderman Kot noted that this is a software program that the Police Department has wanted
however due to funding has held off obtaining. He stated that this is an excellent opportunity to
obtain the funding. Mayor Prochaska stated that if the grant is received,the City will be able to
obtain the expensive software.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
Besco-aye,James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye,Spears-aye,Sticka-aye
Community Preparedness Planning Process Agreement
Mayor Prochaska reported that this is an agreement with a group that wants to assist the City in
preparing its emergency preparedness and disaster plan. With the agreement comes a$10,000.00
grant to be used by the City to update its disaster plan.There is no cost to the City. Alderman
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—April 27,2004-page 3
Kot stated that this comes at a good time as the City's disaster plan is on the verge of completion.
The group will review the plan and ensure it meets the needs of the community.
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve the agreement for the Community
Preparedness Planning Process CEO Pre-Site Agreement and to authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute the agreement.So moved by Alderman Kot;seconded by Alderman Sticka.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
Spears-aye,Sticka-aye,Besco-aye,James-aye,Kot-aye,Mums-aye
Yorkville Trade Show Volunteers
Mayor Prochaska reported that he was looking for volunteers to help at the Yorkville Trade Fair
on Friday,May 14,2004 from 4:00 to 6:00 P.M.or 6:00 to 8:00 P.M.and Saturday,May 15,
2004 from 9:00 to 11:00 A.M.,11:00 A.M.to 1:00 P.M.or 1:00 to 3:00 P.M. He asked those
interested to fill out the sign-up sheet.
Champions of Industry 300 Award Payments
Mayor Prochaska reported that the City received a request for payment for half of the cost for the
production cost for the award. Pat Summerall Productions is aware that the City is looking for
sponsors and he asked the Council to approve payment contingent on receiving the funds.
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve the first payment to Pat Summerall Productions
in the amount of$14,000.00 contingent upon receiving sponsorship funds. So moved by
Alderman Sticka;seconded by Alderman James.
Alderwoman Spears asked that the City Council be provided with a list of the contributors.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye,Spears-aye,Sticka-aye,Besco-aye
ComEd Right-of-Way Lease
Mayor Prochaska reported that he just received the renewal of the ten-year lease with ComEd for
trails along the ComEd right-of-way on the south side of the City. It needs to be approved by the
end of April and there is no cost to the City. He also noted that this is the area where the sewer
line was run and the City did apply for a grant for the trail however did not receive it.
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve the continuation of the lease with ComEd for
the use of their right-of-way for trails and authorize the Mayor to execute the lease. So moved by
Alderman Sticka;seconded by Alderman Kot.
Alderman Sticky asked what would happen if the trail is built and the City looses the lease in ten
years? Administrator Graff stated that if this happens the City may be able to negotiate an
agreement with ComEd.
Alderwoman Spears question if this could be voted on because it was not on the agenda. Mayor
Prochaska and Attorney Kramer stated that the Council can vote on it because it is not
expenditure.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
Spears-aye,Sticka-aye,Besco-aye,James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye
ATTORNEY'S REPORT
No report.
CITY CLERK'S REPORT
No report.
CITY TREASURER'S REPORT
No report.
CITY ADMINISTATOR'S REPORT
No report.
FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No report.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT
No report.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—April 27,2004-pane 4
CHIEF OF POLICE REPORT
No report.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF PARKS&RECREATION REPORT
No report.
COMMUNITY&LIAISON REPORT
No report.
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Ordinance 2004-20—Amending Water Conservation Ordinance 2004-17
2. Building Permit Report for February 2004
3. Resolution 2004-11—Resolution in Support of Illinois Tourism Industry
4. Health Insurance Renewal
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve the Consent Agenda which includes Item 41
from the Public Works Committee Report;Item#2 from the Economic Development Committee
Report and Items#1 and#3 from the Administration Committee Report. So moved by Alderman
Kot;seconded by Alderman Munns.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye,Spears-aye,Sticka-aye,Besco-aye
COMMITTEE REPORTS
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT
Park,Gazebo and Shelter Reservation Policy
A motion was made by Alderman Besco to approve the Park and Recreation Department's Park,
Gazebo and Shelter Reservation Policy as recommended by the Park and Recreation Board;
seconded by Alderman Sticka.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-5 Nays-1
Kot-aye,Munns-aye,Spears-nay,Besco-aye,James-aye
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
Ordinance 2004-21 Amending the PUD Agreement with Cornerstone
Development/Triangle Investment,Inc.and
Authoring Execution of the Agreement
A motion was made by Alderman Sticka to approve an ordinance amending the Planned Unit
Development Agreement with Triangle Investment,Inc.for the project known as Cornerstone
Development and to authorize the execution of the agreement by the Mayor and City Clerk;
seconded by Alderman James.
Alderman Sticks noted that this was the property on Route 47 and Greenbriar.
Attorney Kramer stated that the amendment has been reviewed and everything is agreeable.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
Munns-aye,Spears-aye,Sticka-aye,Besco-aye,James-aye,Kot-aye
Ordinance 2004-22 Amending Land Cash Ordinance 1996-3 and 2003-12
A motion was made by Alderman Sticka to approve an ordinance amending the Land Cash
Ordinances 41996-03 and#2003-12;seconded by Alderman Besco
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
Spears-aye,Sticka-aye,Besco-aye,James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye
Schoppe Design Associates Amendment to Professional Services Agreement
A motion was made by Alderman Sticka to table the motion to approve the amendment to the
Professional Services Agreement between the United City of Yorkville and Schoppe Design
Associates until the next City Council meeting;seconded by Alderman Kot.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
Sticka-aye,Spears-aye,Besco-aye,James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—April 27,2004-page 5
Resolution 2004-12 Approving Grande Reserve Units 5,7&8 Final Plats
A motion was made by Alderman Sticka to approve the resolution approving Final Plat of
Subdivision for Grande Reserve Subdivision Units 5,7,and 8 Final Plats as recommended by the
Planning Commission and City Engineer and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the
plats.
Attorney Kramer asked that the motion be altered to include the approval of the preliminary plat.
A motion was made by Alderman Sticka to approve the resolution approving the Preliminary Plat
and Final Plat of Subdivision for Grande Reserve Subdivision Units 5,7,and 8 Preliminary and
Final Plats as recommended by the Planning Commission and City Engineer and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute the plats.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
Sticka-aye,Spears-aye,Besco-aye,James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye
Amending the PUD and Rezoning Fox Hill Development Unit 6
and Authorizing Execution of Agreement
A motion was made by Alderman Sticks to table the approval of an Ordinance amending the
Planned Unit Development Agreement and Rezoning the Fox Hill Development Unit 6 until the
next City Council meeting;seconded by Alderman Besco.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
Besco-aye,James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye,Spears-aye,Sticks-aye
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMPTTEE REPORT
No report.
ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Records Disposal Service
Attorney Kramer asked that a motion be made to table the Records Disposal Services Contract
until the next City Council meeting.
A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to table the Service Agreement with Accurate
Destruction,Inc.until the next City Council meeting;seconded by Alderman Besco.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0
James-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye,Spears-aye,Sticka-aye,Besco-aye
Approving the 2004-2005 Fiscal Budget
A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to table the approval of an Ordinance approving the
2004-2005 Fiscal Year Budget for the United City of Yorkville;seconded by Alderman Munns.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-5 Nays-1
Munns-aye,Spears-aye,Sticka-aye,Besco-aye,James-nay,Kot-aye
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Alderman Munns asked about the certified letters sent to Fox Hill Residents. He asked if the
residents would be paying for maintenance of the park and Attorney Kramer stated no and that
there will be an amended publication to address the engineering error.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to go into Executive Session for the purpose of discussing
the purchase or lease of real property for the use of the public body,including meetings held for
the purpose of discussing whether a particular parcel should be acquired.
He noted that the other Executive Session on the agenda is not needed at this time. He also stated
that there may be action taken after the session. He asked that the City Clerk,City Treasurer,
City Attorney,City Administrator be included in the session.So moved by Alderman James;
seconded by Alderman Munns.
The Council entered into Executive Session at 10:03 P.M.
The Council returned to regular session at 10:20 P.M.and no action was taken.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—April 27,2004-page 6
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to adjourn. So moved by Alderman Besco;seconded by
Alderman Kot.
Motion approved by a viva voce vote.
Meeting adjourned at 10:21 P.M.
Minutes submitted by:
Jacquelyn Milschewski,
City Clerk City of Yorkville,Illinois
DRAFT
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 21,2003
7:00 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Mayor Art Prochaska
Alderman Joe Besco
Alderwoman Val Burd
Alderman Larry Kot
Alderwoman Rose Spears
Alderman Rich Sticka
Alderman Marty Munns
Alderwoman Wanda Ohare
CITY STAFF PRESENT:
City Administrator Anton Graff
City Treasurer Bill Powell
City Attorney Dan Kramer
Police Chief Harold Martin
Finance Director Traci Pleckham
Executive Director of Yorkville Economic
Development Commission Lynn Dubajic
Public Works Director Eric Dhuse
Guests (as listed below and on attached list):
Mike Kachlic of Vat &Vine Liquors
Mike Schoppe of Schoppe Design Associates
Jason Humm and Larry Vaupel, both of Wiseman-Hughes Enterprises
This meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m.
Presentations:
Dhuse Property- Concept Plan/Wiseman Hughes-Plan Commission (10/8/03)
Mr. Larry Vaupel and Mr. Jason Humm of Wiseman Hughes presented to the Committee
the Concept Plan of the Dhuse Property acquisition, which involves 80 acres of land
along Route 47. Their plan is to expand on the existing Windett Ridge Subdivision,
currently containing 277 lots. This has been presented previously to the Planning
Commission, the Park Board and the School District. He is asking the Committee for
their input with respect to the density which is higher than the zoning requirement. At
the time the plan was being put together, it was unknown that the City would capture
additional land through the Sanitary District, which now extends the area further along
Route 47 to Caton Farm Road, referred to as the commercial corridor.
The key component in this plan is to have a central school and park site. The proposed
site, as Mr. Vaupel explained, would be 20+ acres donated to the School District who are
proposing to build a new elementary school. The Park District requested a smaller park
site, in order to have more available cash from the donation to be able to improve their
existing parks.
As was discussed in a previous Plan Commission meeting, Alderman Sticka and Mayor
Prochaska both indicated that the Comprehensive Plan will be revised in these areas,
particularly with respect to the sewage along the south of the corridor to Caton Farm
Road, now that the Sanitary District has a proposed a plan for this extension. According
to Mayor Prochaska, this would be the logical sewer boundary, as this is as far south as
Yorkville is able to grow. He stated that this could not be expanded to the east of Route
47 due to the geographical boundaries. Mr. Graff pointed out that there is a tributary area
along the Morgan Creek Crossing area down to Ament ? Road.
Alderman Larry Kot pointed out that when this Comprehensive Plan was discussed,
infrastructure was not the only issue reviewed. He believes that these proposed changes
contradict the estate concept, which is now a year old. He is concerned that a precedent
may be set wherein future developers may ask to change comprehensive plans long after
their inception. The Mayor pointed out that as this continues to evolve, and as new
information is received, change is inevitable. This, he stated, will need to be reviewed
and changed again in five years anyway. Administrator Graff stated that the land use
plan did contain language that would require the review of land use changes as utilities
are developed in the southern area because of recent discussions of recording the
centerline for the Aldemain Corridor. Prairie Parkway has also recently been discussed.
Mayor Prochaska stated that the estate is on county zoning. Further, he stated that utilities
must be diligently developed if the City is to continue to expand along Route 47 past the
southern boundary of Windett Ridge. The attraction and commercial value of that area is
Route 47, irregardless of the amount of congestion that Alderman Kot expressed a
concern about.
Upon Alderman Sticka's inquiry, Mayor Prochaska confirmed that a large portion of the
water and sewer has already been funded by developers. Administrator Graff stated that
the City already has a vested interest in this as well, since previously, the Council voted
to exchange the River Crossing to a larger diameter, in order to get to the Caton Farm
Road. He stated that when the land use plan was finished, it was the Sanitary District that
approached the City about preserving the area to Caton Farm Road. This is a$5 million
project. The City is funding $1.7 million of that. This is an investment that the City
hopes to recapture once developments come in along the Route 47 corridor. This area is
considered a transitional area, from the typical suburbia to an open space, but will also
able to take advantage of a proposed new school site. Ultimately, Mr. Graff believes that
this 90-acre addition of land has advantages for the whole community. He stated that the
balance of growth can still be achieved by keeping the density at 1.5-2.0 in that corridor
and still be able to have larger lots, with minimal impact to the area.
With respect to the concerns with setting a precedence, Attorney Dan Kramer stated that
there has never been a case in the State of Illinois that would require the annexation of a
parcel of property. Thus, setting a precendence is not even an issue, since there is no
duty to annex. He stated that Fox Metro would agree that a municipality could not afford
to expand utilities with less than two dwelling units per acre. He believes by keeping the
density at 1.5-2.0, it would still be lower than many of the surrounding communities.
Furthermore, he stated, an estate character can still be maintained.
Attorney Daniel Kramer stated that since the annexation agreement form he uses for
the
City has language that actually requires an amendment to the comprehensive plan to
accommodate the zoning, he would also process a text ordinance when going through the
preliminary plan process. This would cover the density issue so it closely matches the
Comprehensive Plan.
The City has been working with the land planner on the open space corridor plan to
ensure incorporation of the additional acre of the trail corridor.
Mr. Vaupel indicated that if a commercial corridor along Route 47 is what the Committee
members invision, there must be surrounding houses to support it. He encouraged
members to think in terms of long-term taxes. Ultimately, if no action is taken, another
developer will develop the area with utilities and extend the water main.
Alderman Kot inquired of the Mayor if any meetings have been scheduled with Joliet to
move forward with discussions of a boundary agreement. The Mayor's response was that
since they are more than three miles, any action that they take at this time is not legally-
binding. Administrator Graff stated that Mr. John Mersaros (sp??) of Joliet has requested
a meeting with Yorkville, Oswego and Plainfield officials to discuss the Caton Farm
corridor. He was waiting until after their sanitary issue is resolved. Mr. Graff stated that
this issue is in its final stages of resolution, and expects a meeting within the next six
months. Already, discussions have taken place with respect to transportation issues, and
conservation and preservation rights.
Mr. Mike Schoppe of Schoppe Design Associates advised the committee members those
issues that were discussed in a recent Plan Commission meeting. He stated that the
members were in favor of this type of development.
Mayor Prochaska encouraged the members to think about how the City is to determine
what is to be done with the undeveloped land located east on the map that was presented
at this meeting as a visual display.
Alderwoman Burd stated that the initial plan when council members voted to oversize the
sewer lines was to expand down Caton Farm Road. She believes that this issue needs to
be reviewed to determine a final and specific plan on how to develop along the corridor,
one that needs to be followed through to the end. The Mayor stated that at the time of
the Comprehensive Plan, factors such as the proposed school that needed to be built, and
River Crossing that had to be determined, did not allow for enough time for council
members to make fully informed decisions. Alderwoman Burd inquired if this area
continues to extend to Caton Farm Road, would they be committed to that type of
development. The Mayor's response was that, yes, a committment must be made to some
type of development. Alderman Sticka stated that the land use plan must be specific. He
stated that if there will be areas of estate zoning, the council members need to be told
exactly where they will be.
The Mayor stated that,with respect to the boundaries to the south,there is not the same
urgency to develop this area as there was to the area to the north, as no one is pressing the
boundaries to the south. He stated, however, that there has to be a plan implemented to
be in that area, and,to convince the landowners to agree to this plan in order to get a
boundary agreement. Alderman Kot is concerned with the changing densities on the
south end than what was originally presented to the citizens of the community. In
defense to this statement, Administrator Graff stated that with hopes of lowering the
public's concerns, consideration was made to enlarge the school site beyond the
contribution that was required of the land cash. Therefore, if another developer wanted to
come in and look at a similiar type of schematic land use plan, Yorkville is offering
"uniqueness" by allowing them to have 12,000 square foot lots in the estate area because
15 acres of school site was given that meets the elementary need in that area. He stated
that there was a "mix-match" of planning in that area that had developed over the years.
He further stated that they are just now reviewing the land use for open space for parks,
schools and conservation areas. In the past,there was not the same partnership in place
to look at this. He asked the committee if they wish to move forward for annexation or
wait until the land use plan modification. Attorney Kramer's response was that this
should be done simultaneously. He did indicate that the entire area all the way down to
Caton Farm road does not have to be dealt with all at one time. The Mayor suggested that
they consider reviewing PUD's on a case-by-case basis, instead of doing a straight
annexation. It was unanimously agreed by the Committee to allow Wiseman-Hughes to
move forward with the current plan as presented.
MAYOR
NIU Downtown Study
The Mayor stated that William Dettmer received a call from Roger Dalhstrom with
Northern Illinois University to discuss the proposal recently submitted to the City, which
covers the redevelopment plan for the exterior renovations of the downtown area. He is
recommending the removal of the Exterior Building Conditions Map since it would not
affect the overall report. Alderwoman Burd stated that this map was a poor reference,
which may give a negative opinion of the older structures in the downtown area.
It ws unanimously agreed by the Committee to take out the map, which will be placed on
Consent Agenda. Also, it was decided to place on the regular agenda Mr. Dalhstrom's
report for review and/or acceptance.
Adhoc Committee for City/School District#115
The Mayor stated that he has been approached by the School District with respect to
setting up an Adhoc Committee for the joint property sharing as per agreement of earlier
this year. It was proposed that this Committee would consist of members of the school
board, park board and key city staff members to review the school's use of some of the
City's facilities. The School Board is recommending Dave Dockstetter as their
representative, Bob Pilmer as the Park Board liason, John Evans as a city staff member
and Alderwoman Wanda Ohare as a representative from the City Council, since she is the
City's school board representative. Alderman Paul James,who was not present at this
meeting, would also be approached by the Mayor for his participation in this Committee.
The Mayor suggested meeting before November's proposed first meeting for initial set up
of participating members.
Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 2003-30 Amending the Liquor Control
Ordinance allowing Sampling or Tasting of Alcoholic Liquors from Class A
The Mayor stated that when Title 3, Chapter 3, Article 4, Section(B)of the Liquor
Control Ordinance was originally drafted, the tasting of liquor was placed in the bar class,
which actually allows for serving liquor without an ordinance. The ordinance allowing
tasting was suppose to go into the packaged liquor class. Thus, the newly proposed
ordinance, allows the change back into the "B" class for Liquor License Holders to peimit
sampling of the products being sold, but subject to certain restrictions. These would
include the proper supervision of the serving of liquor, the consumption of liquor being
strictly prohibited to any persons under the age of 21, the number of times of week
allowed for the sampling event,the number of ounces of wine that shall be allowed and
the number of products that are allowed to be sampled. Mike Kachlic of Vine and Vat
Liquors, who had a recent wine tasting event had to obtain a "special event" license to
allow him to do this. Mr. Kachlic stated that the original ordinance does not define the
number of bottles that are allowed to be open for wine tasting. Further, the number of
different wines the customer is currently allowed to sample was limited to three, which,
he believes is unrealistic since he would be required to "police" customers who are in his
store during such an event. He is proposing limiting the quantity poured at these events,
as opposed to attempting the difficult task of monitoring consumption by each individual.
The Mayor requested that this ordinance be passed to get the wine sampling placed into
the correct class, after grammatical errors have been corrected. Then in order to review
the remaining issues closer, the Mayor recommended that this go back to the Public
Safety Committee (for November's meeting) for determination of the following: The
total number of bottles that will be allowed to be opened (specifically defining the
number for beer, wine and various spirits), the number of ounces allowed per serving for
each category, definition of a "special event" used specifically for this purpose, and the
number of"tastes" allowed by each customer. With the upcoming holidays, the Mayor
has allowed the fee required to obtain the "special event" license to be waived for Mr.
Kachlic while this Ordinance is being reviewed.
It was unanimously agreed to place this issue on the regular agenda for the next City
Council meeting.
CITY ATTORNEY
Cooper Land Purchase
Attorney Daniel Kramer stated that the Cooper family and his office are in their fmal
stages of the agreement. He has been negotiation the acquisition of one-half of an acre
from the Coopers for a booster pumping station that ties in with the City's water tower.
The Coopers have amicably agreed to give this half-acre for $17,500 and three free
residential tap-ons. Attorney Kramer is requesting approval to have the Coopers sign the
easement document and the authority to pay the Coopers the $17,500 for their property.
This will be placed on the Public Works agenda for a two-third's vote.
CITY TREASURER
Treasurer's Report
City Treasurer William Powell presented to the Committee, a draft of the 2002-2003
Treasurer's Report which still needs revision. Mr. Powell stated that there are some
errors that need correction with respect to the numbers and intends to have this ready to
have this placed on the regular agenda for the following week, since he only just received
this report earlier in the day. The original will be filed with the City Clerk after revisions
have been made. Attorney Kramer stated that this will be accepted on a Motion, after it
has been discussed and agreed upon by City Council.
Mr. Powell also stated that he is in the process of reviewing and tracking the City's five-
year history of expenses. This he intends to present at a future Administration
Committee. As per Alderman Munn's request, it was agreed by Traci Pleckham to clarify
those line items that only list a name, by issuance of an addendum before it gets
published. This, Alderman Munns stated, will assist members in determining the
following year's budget.
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
No Report
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Zoning Variance for Kimberly and Michael O'Malley, 906 Morgan Street-Zoning
Board of Appeals (10/14/03)
Administrator Graff stated that a public hearing took place to discuss the deviation to the
variance proposed by the O'Malley's, whose property is located at 906 Morgan Street, and
is currently zoned as R-2. It was voted 4-0 by the Zoning Board of Appeals to allow the
reduction of the rear yard set back by 12 feet. Currently, their yard contains a back porch
that extends 12 feet into the setback, even though no records have been located
demonstrating that a variance was granted for this porch. They are seeking to remove the
existing porch and extend the existing living room by 12 feet. Attorney Daniel Kramer
will be drafting the ordinance and by Committee's majority consensus, this will be placed
on the consent agenda for City Council since the requested variance is greater than a
10%.
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
No Report
ADMINISTRATION COMMITEE
Internship Manual-Administration Committee (10/9/03)
Alderwoman Spears indicated that her Committee recommended that this be brought to
C.O.W. to decide if they will be approving the cost to sponsor interns, so members are
aware of the amount of money needed to be budgeted. The Mayor's response to this was
that anytime an amount exceeds $5,000, it would automatically have to be budgeted. Ms.
Spears also inquired of the Committee if they would have the ability to approve the cost
for each intern who is contracted to work. Further she inquired if Council members will
be kept abreast of each intern's performance with a summary of projects they are working
on. The Mayor suggested each intern provide a final summary at the end of their
contract to determine the value of their work. Administrator Graff indicated that interns
are already required to submit a weekly report to their school toward their final grade, as
referenced in the cooperative agreement portion of the field placement section in the
Internship Manual. He offered to give copies of this report to Council members. Further,
he stated,that he can submit an evaluation and assessment of the intern program to
determine its effectiveness.
Alderman Besco asked if verbiage could be included in the Internship Manual with
respect to nepotism(favoritism shown by appointing employment positions to relatives of
City employees, based on family relationship). Administrator Graff stated that according
to discussions with the labor attorney, the City's policy prohibits a city employee to
supervise his or her spouse, but was not sure if it specifically covered other family
relationships. Both he and Attorney Dan Kramer agreed to look into this. The Mayor
suggested that this verbiage cover all family relationships, which would specifically
prohibit an employee from supervising any relative within the same department.
With respect to intern, Bart(LAST NAME??), Alderwoman Spears inquired of Traci
Pleckham if he submitted his final evaluation. As of the date of this meeting, he had not.
Ms. Pleckham stated that she would provide that to the Committee at the next C.O.W.
meeting. It was unanimously agreed by this Committee to bring this issue back to the
next scheduled C.O.W. meeting.
Hire Part-time Secretary for City Council-Administration Committee (10/9/03)
Alderwoman Spears stated that her Committee recommended hiring an administrative
assistant that would report directly to the City Council whose main job function would be
to review the overwhelming amount of paperwork that Council members receive. The
issue that continues to arise each time this is brought up is: Who would this person
ultimately report to? Alderman Munns asked, if this person is to report to all eight
council members, how would that person know how to prioritize each council members
request? Both Alderman Munns and Alderman Sticka expressed their opposition to
hiring a secretary. Alderwoman Burd stated that since city staff members are overloaded
with their own work, it is very difficult for council members to expect their assistance.
Mayor Prochaska reminded the Council members that no money has been budgeted this
year for additional staff. He stated that with the coming year's budget,the priority will be
to budget money for additional staff, which, he believes, will alleviate some of the
problems that council members are experiencing. Discussions have started,he stated, to
determine staffing needs. Further,he stated that an ordinance should be drafted to define
this proposed person's job responsibilities and to whom they are to report. He
recommended that if a person were to be hired, they could also assist the deputy clerk
with putting together the packets for meetings, whenever he or she is not working on
assignments from council members. It was recommended that this be returned to the
Administration Committee for the purpose of putting together a precise job description
for this proposed position in order for Attorney Kramer to draft an ordinance.
Funding for Library Building Expansion Project-Administration Committee(10/9/03)
As per memo dated October 17, 2003 from Traci Pleckham, Finance Director, it was the
Administration Committee recommendation that Ehlers &Associates serve as the City's
Financial Advisory Service Provider for the Library Building Expansion Project. Ms.
Pleckham advised that as per Attorney Kelly Kramer's advisement,the $250 Library
Development Fee can be used toward this project. The Mayor advised that this would be
added to the revised Budget. He stated that he is currently looking into having Moser
Enterprises provide funding up front for the total permit fees for the MPI Project to allow
available dollars for the City's capital purchases. According to Administrator Graff,the
total permit fees would be around $9,000. The Mayor proposed drafting a memo to send
to the Library Board reflecting this. He also expressed this as a possible option at a
recent Library Board Meeting. He recommended another meeting with the Library
Board to make sure they were comfortable with having Moser fund the dollars versus
having the City do so, as they originally proposed.
It was this Committee's recommendation that this be placed on the Agenda for City
Council for November 10, 2003, which follows the Library Board meeting.
In-Town Road Program-Smith Engineering Contract and Funding
Alderwoman Spears presented to the Committee the Proposal from Smith Engineering to
perform design engineering for utilities and roadways for Phase 1 and Phase 2. This
proposal is for the total fixed fee amount of$87,870, as opposed to a"not-to-exceed"
amount for both Phases. She also indicated that Smith Engineering will not invoice for
more than$40,000 of the work before May 1, 2004. Smith Engineering projected
completion date would be early Spring of 2004. The balance would be invoiced in May,
2004, which would mean that this would need to be budgeted for the next fiscal year. In
essence, Mrs. Spears stated, Smith Engineering is agreeing to carry the cost for this
project until the City can afford to pay for it, which is why they proposed the fixed fee
amount, as the trade-off. If City Council approves their Proposal, funds could be
expensed from the City's General Fund Contingency line item, which currently has a
balance of$146,203.00. Administrator Graff reminded the committee members that the
engineering portion of this project is critical to get the financing for this program.
The Mayor recommended placing this on City's Council's Consent Agenda, subject to the
attorney's review of Smith Engineering's Proposal.
PARK BOARD
Concord Homes-Raintree Village Park Land
The Mayor stated that this particular issue involves Concord Homes wanting to take back
a portion of the green space of the Raintree Village Park Land. They still intend to use it
for recreational purposes, and proposed building a clubhouse and possibly a pool on the
property. They are proposing instead of giving the City land, they would give cash for
this space. Administrator Graff advised that a Motion must be accepted by the Council
to accept the offer of cash($106,000)over the land, which is 1.8 acres. The cost is
$58,000 per acre.
It was agreed by the Committee to place this on City Council's Consent Agenda to accept
the cash offer.
Beecher Use- Committee of the Whole (10/7/03)
This was tabled due to the fact that the Parks and Recreational Director, Laura Brown
was unable to attend this meeting.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
For the purshase of lease of real property for the use of the public body.
Parks and Recreation Director, Laura Brown was not in attendance for this meeting, due
to another committment,thus the Executive Session has been rescheduled for November
18, 2003.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Alderwoman Burd inquired when the new version of the overlay ordinance would be
ready. Mayor Prochaska's response was that he would look into having that ready as
soon as the following Tuesday.
Alderwoman Spears shared with the Committee the letter she received from the Colonial
Parkway residents with respect to garbage pick up. Administrator Graff stated that
residents have been calling for about six months wondering to whom they are to pay their
garbage service;whether it needs to be paid to the management company or directly to
the owners. He reviewed the Contract and found that it specifically states that since these
are townhouses, the City is responsible for providing garbage services. Mr. Graff further
stated that discussions have occurred with Waste Management to take this over. He
stated that the difficulty the residents are having with taking their cans all the way to the
curb for pick up. Thus, it was decided to keep the dumpsters for the residents and
provide them with recycling cans. The residents were happy with that idea. A letter will
be going out to each resident confirming this new arrangement.
The Mayor reminded the Committee that the Tourism Committee will be having a
breakfast the following day at 7:30 a.m. at Gray's Mill.
Meeting Adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
- � L. Li
Page 1 of 4
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Tuesday,April 20, 2004
City Hall Lower Level Conference Room
7:00 p.m.
In Attendance:
City
Art Prochaska—Mayor Richard Sticka- Alderman
Valerie Burd - Alderwoman Rose Spears - Alderwoman
Paul James -Aldeilrian Larry Kot- Alderman
Wanda Ohare -Alderwoman Joe Besco - Alderman
Tony Graff—City Administrator Traci Pleckham—City Finance Director
Marty Munns—Alderman Kelly Kramer—City Attorney
Laura Brown—Executive Director of Parks &Recreation
Guests
Kathy Farren—Kendall County Record Lois William
Dan Waitt- Beacon News Lois William
Sue Vos—Aurora Tourism Council Peter Huinker— SEC Engineering
Russ Walter—Library Board Lou Riedl
Michelle Pfister— Library Board J. MacNeil—Yas/Fischer
Tim Winter—PDG S. Yas—Yas/Fischer
Craig Cobine, Attorney Drew Daniels - Sexton
Steve Larson—Ehlers & Associates Julie Govi
Joseph Gruber—Library Board Marvin DeLahr—Indep. Engineer
Mayor Prochaska called the meeting to order at 7:03pm
Presentation:
1. Fine Arts Presentation by Sue Vos
Sue Vos of the Aurora Tourism Council appeared before the committee to speak
about tourism possibilities for Yorkville. She started the discussion with a handout
of questions pertaining to "Arts in Yorkville." Ms. Vos stated that art professionals
are leaving the urban areas for safe, friendly areas and seeking small towns. In
addition, travel habits have changed and travelers are now going to "off the beaten
path" areas to purchase art and to shop in unique areas.
She asked for ideas from the committee as to cultural aspects they would like to see
in the community. Some of the suggestions were: art gallery, cultural center,
unique shopping, new library, museum, ability to sponsor events, sculpture gardens
and art pieces/education for children and adults.
Page 2 of 4
Ms. Vos then asked what resources the community has to achieve these goals.
Some of these resources noted were: people, unique buildings, unit of government
in support of these projects, economic development, developers, access to grants,
Riverwalk, Fox River, community theater,junior college nearby, library, access to
grants and many others.
Possible locations suggested for art programs were the former jail, Boy Scout camp,
Riverwalk, shops and restaurants. Ms. Vos suggested the possibility of partnering
with local businesses such as the lumber company and the custom cabinet business.
Further, she offered suggestions of the various types of events which could be held
such as outdoor theater, film festival, art workshops, artist in residence programs,
"organ crawl" (music from several churches) and more.
The discussion turned to funding. In order to begin the program, she suggested
increasing the hotel tax by one point, securing grants and developer fees. She also
noted a proposed program for the State to repay the loans of arts students.
To begin the initiative for a possible arts program Ms. Vos suggested the following:
• Arts Forum—input from people in the arts
• Product Inventory—potential spaces for events
• Benchmark Survey—set up on website, publish in papers asking for input
from citizens
In conclusion, she offered any help her organization could provide.
The Mayor moved forward in the agenda to the Land Cash Ordinance
Mayor:
1. Land Cash Ordinance 96-3 and 2003-12
The dollar amount for the developer has been increased under this ordinance and
would apply to any new development at the time this ordinance is passed. This item
will go before the City Council for consideration.
2. Library Request for Referendum
Mr. Russ Walter of the Library Board introduced Michelle Pfister (Director of the
Library) and Steve Larson (Library Board Financial Advisor).
Mr. Walter gave an overview of Board discussions which included the building plan
for a new library, how much it would cost to build and operate the building based on
community growth and how it could be funded. The Library Board wishes to place
Page 3 of 4
a referendum on the November ballot to raise $8,750,000. This represents about
$40 additional tax dollars on the average $200,000 home or about 10 cents for each
$100. The Library Board favors the referendum as the only way to raise this
money.
Mayor Prochaska asked if there is a plan to enlist the community's involvement to
raise money and place people in positions to support the referendum. Attorney
Kramer cautioned that there is a new ethics ordinance adopted by municipalities
which governs politics. Mr. Walter added that the Board is aware that no signs
showing support for the referendum can appear on the library property, library
employees cannot ask for votes, but can state that there is a referendum and plans
for the library can be displayed inside the building. A "Friends of the Library"
group will be organized to gather support for the project.
Mr. Walter noted there had been some discussion whether November would be the
optimum time for this referendum since the schools would also have a referendum
at that time. The Mayor noted that November would provide the largest voter
turnout.
Alderwoman Ohare asked if six months [before November] would be adequate time
for all the necessary paperwork. The City would have to place the referendum on
the ballot since the Library does not have the authority to issue bonds. It was noted
that the City Council would have to adopt an ordinance to place the referendum on
the ballot after the Library Board adopts a resolution. A resolution must be adopted
by the Library Board 65 days before the election. The Mayor noted that the Council
must also be convinced that this measure warrants a referendum. He also mentioned
that legal meetings/public hearings might be necessary before it is even placed on a
referendum. Attorney Kramer will look into the legal issues. It was noted that the
Library Board has voted to proceed with the referendum on the ballot.
Alderman James asked how long the additional $40 in taxes would be needed to
fund this project. If no other city funds were used, the length of time would be 20
years based on projected growth. Mr. Walter stated that based on projected
population growth, the operating budget could be funded. Development fees could
also offset the bond costs.
It was noted that the group to support the referendum and open bank accounts could
be organized at this time and that anyone can be in that group. Mr. Larson stated
that up to $300,000 can be received or spent, before the State Board of Elections
needs to be notified.
Mr. Walter explained that the State recommends a certain square footage per
population and that the library would be built based on a life expectancy of 20 years.
There would be room for expansion and the existing building would be joined by a
Page 4 of 4
hallway with the new structure. Branch libraries are options as the City grows,
however, since the property is available, the new structure would be built at the
present location. This location also made sense due to the school and Beecher
center being nearby.
To conclude the discussion, the Mayor asked Attorney Kramer to ascertain the
schedule for the City to place this matter on the November ballot, for discussion at
the next Committee of the Whole meeting. Mayor Prochaska also asked for a
Library Board member to be present at the May 4th meeting.
At this point, the meeting was being moved back upstairs for the rest of the agenda
items. Due to tornado conditions in the area, the attendees were immediately moved
back to the basement. After a meeting delay, Mayor Prochaska ended the
Committee of the Whole meeting at approximately 8:20pm due to continued severe
weather conditions.
Minutes respectfully submitted by
Marlys Young, Minute Taker
Page 1 of 10
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE DRAFT
APRIL 27, 2004
6:30 P.M.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT:
Mayor Art Prochaska Alderman Marty Munns
Alderman Joe Besco Alderwoman Rose Spears
Alderman Paul James Alderman Richard Sticka
Alderman Larry Kot City Clerk Jackie Milschewski
City Treasurer Bill Powell
CITY STAFF PRESENT:
City Administrator Tony Graff City Attorney Kelly Kramer
Public Works Director Eric Dhuse (until 8:50) Police Chief Harold Martin(until 8:15)
Police Lieutenant Don Schwartzkopf Director of Parks &Recreation Laura Brown
Finance Director Traci Pleckham(until 7:50)
GUESTS:
See attached list.
Detail Board Report
Mayor Prochaska asked if there were any questions regarding the April 17, 2004 Detail Board
Report.
Alderwoman Spears questioned the following invoices:
• Aquafix—page 1 —$457.64 for bio stimulants and vitamins. Director of Public Works
Dhuse explained that the charge was for microorganisms used in the sewers and lift
stations.
• City of Yorkville Petty Cash—page 5—$57.72 for App. Dinner Supp,Myr Bkfst-
Executive Director of Parks &Recreation Brown explained that this was for the
Salvation Army Dinner
• Elan Financial Services-page 10—line#20 - $173.26 for Present A Plaque Corp.
Finance Director Pleckham stated that this was for the plaques presented at the
appreciation dinner.
• Elan Financial Services—page 10—line#25 —$233.46 for Auction pymt, Eng Dig.
Camera and line#26 - $70.73 for Auction pymt, Eng. Camera Dock. Administrator Graff
explained that the Engineering Depaitment purchased a digital camera and dock from
EBay to use on inspections.
• Elan Financial Services—page 10—line#27 - $250.00 for IL Basketball Academy,Rec
Dep. Ms. Brown explained that this was the entrance fee for a basketball tournament.
• Milschewski, Jackie—page 16 - $102.50 for 4 hrs COW mtg minutes. Mayor Prochaska
explained that the Clerk's office is treated separately from other elected officials and can
hold a paying job with the City along with being City Clerk. Attorney Kelly Kramer
stated that the rules governing this are all statutory.
• Ralph's Place—page 21 - $45.00 for 3-22-04 Business Lunch Graff. Administrator Graff
explained that this was a business lunch with property owners in order to discuss right-of-
way acquisition for Faxon Road
Page 2 of 10
Alderman Munns asked if Paradise Car Wash billed the City once a month and Chief Martin
explained that the squad cars are washed there and the charge is$3.00 or$4.00/car. They do bill
the City once a month and it is usually around $30.00/month.
There were no further comments or questions. This item was sent on to the City Council meeting
for approval.
Building Permit Report for February 2004
There were no comments or questions. This item was sent on to the City Council meeting for
approval.
Ordinance Amending Land Cash Ordinance 1996-03 and 2003-12
Administrator Graff stated that the Council accepted the report from the appraiser and now the
current ordinance needs to be amended to reflect this. Mayor Prochaska noted that this will raise
the Fair Market Value for any parcel of land to $73,500.00.
There were no comments or questions. This item was sent on to the City Council meeting for
approval.
Schoppe Design Association Amendment to Professional Services Agreement
Mayor Prochaska reported that Mike Schoppe has added a level called Project Management
which was not previously in his contract. This level is will cover tasks that he does for the City
as a Project Manager. The proposed rate is $110.00/hour which is less than what is charged when
he is a Project Principal. He also increased the rates for Project Principal from $115/hour to
$123.00/hour and for attendance of City meetings from $95.00/hour to $100.00/hour. Attorney
Kramer has reviewed the agreement.
Upon further review, Mayor Prochaska noted that the copy of the contract in the Council's packet
was the old contract from 2002. He suggested that this item be brought back to the May 4, 2004
Committee of the Whole(COW)meeting. Administrator Graff noted that Mr. Schoppe has a
three year contract with the City and he is amending the fees. Attorney Kramer stated that a rider
or addendum can be added to the contract to address the changes.
Alderman Sticka asked what the City has paid Schoppe Design for services in the past and he
questioned what the impact of the increase would be. He questioned what the budgetary impact
of the increase will be. Mayor Prochaska asked Administrator Graff to contact Mr. Schoppe for a
breakdown of hours. Administrator Graff stated that he would have staff compile a fiscal report
and he would ask Mr. Schoppe what he feels the percentage of jobs will be as Project Principal
versus Project Manager.
Alderwoman Spears asked if staff could obtain comparable rates from other firms for the Council
to review. Administrator Graff stated he would get this information.
This item will be brought back to the May 4, 2004 COW meeting.
Resolution in Support of Illinois Tourism Industry
Mayor Prochaska reported that this was discussed at the last City Council meeting. Administrator
Graff stated that the resolution information was received from the Aurora Area Convention and
Visitors Bureau(AACVB). Attorney Kramer stated that the resolution was reviewed and it states
that the City supports the tourism industry which is being affected by tax cuts in Springfield.
Page 3 of 10
Mayor Prochaska noted that this is important because the City was looking towards the tourism
industry to help build up business in Yorkville and the cuts affect grant dollars available.
The collection of the hotel room tax was discussed. The City's hotel room tax funds the City's
participation in the AACVB. The state's portion is going into the state's general fund rather than
for promoting tourism.
This item was sent on to the City Council meeting for approval.
Proposed Subdivision Control Ordinance—Request for Public Hearing
Alderman Besco reported that the Public Works Committee recommended that this be moved on
to a public hearing. The date of the hearing was discussed and it was recommended by Attorney
Kramer and Administrator Graff that it be at the June 8, 2004 City Council meeting.
Alderwoman Spears noted that on page two of the ordinance, section 5.00,the numbering does
not correspond to the numbering in the ordinance. Attorney Kramer explained that City Engineer
Joe Wywrot was spearheading the changes.He is waiting for response from staff before he
revises the ordinance. She stated that the Council would have a clean copy before the hearing.
Alderwoman Spears questioned if the selection of historic street names was addressed in the
ordinance. Mayor Prochaska agreed this should be included and Administrator Graff and
Attorney Kramer stated that they would discuss this with staff.
Also discussed was a presentation of the ordinance to the Planning Commission before the public
hearing for their input.
Proposed Wetlands Protection Ordinance—Request for Public Hearing
Mayor Prochaska questioned the purpose for the public hearing since one was previously held.
Administrator Graff noted that there is new legislation pending that affects this ordinance and the
City has added storm water quality standards.He recommended that the public hearing be held
either late May or early June 2004. Attorney Kramer stated she would verify the length of the
public notice and if it should be part of the Subdivision Control Ordinance. Administrator Graff
stated that he would send the Council a memo when the legal mechanisms are worked out.
Records Disposal Service Quotes
Mayor Prochaska reported that Attorney Kramer has asked that this be tabled because they have
reviewed the contract and there are a few legal issues to negotiate with the provider. This will be
tabled to a future date.
Health Insurance Renewal
Mayor Prochaska reported that a local insurance broker from Plano has approached the City and
asked to represent it in its insurance needs. He met with the broker who explained that the City
would have the exact same coverage with no change in the cost. They have also offered to help
with open enrollment. The City would have to send a letter to the current broker in Naperville
informing them of the change.
Alderwoman Spears asked why the City is switching brokers. Mrs. Pleckham stated that the
Plano broker currently handles the City's unemployment insurance and is actually a middleman
for the current broker, First Non-Profit.
Page 4 of 10
Alderwoman Spears stated that the Administration Committee recommended that health
insurance renewal moves forward.
Mayor Prochaska asked the Council's opinion about changing brokers. It was the consensus of
the Council to authorize the Mayor and Finance Director to send a letter to the current broker
informing them of the change.
Ordinance Amending Water Conservation Ordinance
Attorney Kramer explained that this amends the penalty section of the current ordinance with
regards to complaints and penalty payment. This allows citizens due process;they cannot be
adjudicated without a finding by a judge.
Alderman James asked if there was a provision in the ordinance which addresses written notice
before an offender is fined. Attorney Kramer stated that it will be monitoring issue with the
Police Department as to first issuing a fine or only a warning. Administrator Graff stated that a
procedure addressing warnings could be drafted for staff to follow. First-time offenders could
receive a warning along with a copy of the ordinance. Mayor Prochaska stated he would like to
see a warning given initially before a fine is issued.
This item was sent on to the City Council meeting for approval.
Park, Gazebo and Shelter Reservation Policy
Attorney Kramer stated that after the previous COW discussion, she and Ms. Brown met and
changed language in the policy so that there is no exclusive use by any particular party. She
stated that Ms. Brown and Mr. Dhuse will discuss if whether or not they want to designate certain
parks that are more applicable for the policy. All public walkways,playgrounds, etc., will be
accessible to the public at any particular time. Mayor Prochaska noted that changes to the policy
have been highlighted in the draft.
Alderman Kot asked if signs will be posted indicating that an area is reserved and if there is a
problem,who would the renters contact. Ms. Brown stated that the reservation will be posted and
renters will have a permit showing they have rented the particular area. Also Park staff is on call
on weekends or the Police Department can be contacted.
Alderwoman Spears questioned if people have paid in the past to reserve a facility. Mayor
Prochaska stated that yes there has been a nominal fee in the past.
Alderman Sticka asked how Yorkville's fees compare to other communities and Ms. Brown
stated that they are approximately half of other communities.
This item was sent on to the City Council meeting for approval.
PC 2001 Grande Reserve Final Plats 5, 7& 8
Administrator Graff reported that the Planning Commission Economic Development Committee
and staff recommended the approval of the final plats.
Mayor Prochaska asked if both the preliminary plat and final plat need to be approved and
Attorney Kramer stated that approval was needed for both.
Page 5 of 10
This item was sent on to the City Council meeting for approval.
PC 2001-16 Fox Hill Amendment to PUD Agreement
Attorney Kramer stated that the ordinance authorizing the amendment to the previous annexation
and development agreements has several request by the developer which are more policy
decisions for the Council. Administrator Graff stated that the Planned Unit Development(PUD)
Agreement highlights a couple of areas that have been negotiated between the developer and
staff. He suggested going through the agreement and addressing the policy questions.
Mayor Prochaska noted that the PUD changes R-2 One-Family Residence District changes to B-3
Service Business District and R-2 One-Family Residence District to R-4 General Residential
District and R-2 zoning is proposed to change to B-3.
Rob Gambarth, attorney for the developer, stated that the jagged property line has been realigned
and squared-up. This creates a small amount of additional commercial area south of the new
property line,along Eldamain Road. Instead of thirty-six single-family residences (SFR),there
will be seventy-two units of multifamily residences(MFR). Mr. Gambarth stated that the
principal reasons behind the request for relief were changes to the property due to changes to
Eldamain Road, realignment of the entrance to match Lakewood Homes' entrance and the Rob
Roy Creek Flood Plain. He stated that thirty-six SFR's lots were reduced to twenty-six lots and
that one third of the land has been lost due to different circumstances. He noted that the changes
have cost the developer over$300,000.00 in additional fees.
Changes to the PUD Agreement were discussed:
• Page 3, item#6 - The developer is asking to be relieved of the contributions to
improvements made to Eldamain Road. The original agreement asked the developer to
contribute 20%to the City for the upgrade of the road. The Council discussed:
o The City has given the jurisdiction for Eldamain Road to Kendall County
o The City of Plano did not require the developer on their side to make
improvements to Eldamain Road
o Public safety issues to having the entrances of the development align
o A right turn lane into the development off of Eldamain
o The developer following the County's requirements.
After some discussion it was agreed that the developer would be relieved of contributions to
improvements on Eldamain Road for everything other than those improvement required by
Kendall County.
• Page 3, item#7—The developer is asking that the City negotiate an Economic
Development Incentive Agreement for sales tax rebates for public improvements,
engineering costs and other related expenses incurred as part of the redesign on
reengineering of Unit 7. Mr. Gambarth stated that cost of realigning the entrance was
approximately $68,000.00. The Council discussed capping the rebate amount; public
improvements; the flood plain; the zoning change as requested by the City; architectural
design standards; square footage of units; the site being a"big box" site and increasing
the school transition fee to the current requirement.
Alderman Sticka stated that the granting of rezoning to R-4 was meant to be compensation for
this cost and he didn't agree with granting a rebate in addition to this. Mr. Gambarth stated the
rezoning was to replace the loss of ten lots due to various impacts. Six SFR lots were loss to the
realignment of the road and an additional four lots were lost to the flood plain. Alderman Munns
Page 6 of 10
agreed with Alderman Sticka because the rezoning allows more multifamily residences.
Alderman Sticka noted that in the past, rebates were given because the developer was building
something that is a public improvement for the community at large. Alderman James commented
that he supported the change to the zoning but did not support the tax rebate. He stated that the
realignment of the entrance road is a benefit to the subdivision and he did not see public
improvements being made that will help the remainder of the community. Alderman Sticka
stated he agreed with Alderman James but it could also be looked at that the road realignment is a
public improvement in the sense that it leads to a commercial area and the signalized intersection
benefits public safety. He stated that the re-engineering of the entrance should be considered but
the re-engineering of the subdivision shouldn't be compensated. Alderwoman Spears also
disagreed with the rebate.
Administrator Graff outlined the history behind the developer's request for the rebate, including
the request for re-engineering by the City. He stated that the third re-engineering of the
subdivision was done at the request of the City and the developer is asking in good faith to be
compensated for this. Administrator Graff stated that the PUD amendment is driven by the
rezoning change. If it is the consensus of the Council to rezone,the policy questions can come
back to the Council with more information to be provided by the developer at a later time.
Attorney Kramer recommended that the Council vote on both the rezoning and amended PUD
together because they are tied together.
Alderman Kot expressed his concern regarding the townhome units being purchased to be used as
rental property. He asked if language could be incorporated into the agreement prohibiting this.
Attorney Kramer stated she would verify is this possible.
Alderman Munns asked what the developer's plans were for buffers. Mr. Gambarth explained
that the developer is contemplating buffering around all the buildings. He stated that they are
willing to work with the City regarding this. There was further discussion regarding the
maintenance of the buffer areas,the Homeowner's Association(HOA)and the Special Service
Area(SSA).
Mayor Prochaska asked the Council, as a directive to the developer, if they were generally
favorable to the rezoning requests.
Aldermen Besco, Sticka, and James indicated that they in favor of the rezoning. Alderwoman
Spears stated she was against it. Alderman Munns indicated that he was possibly in favor of the
rezoning but he still had questions regarding the appearance of the units and buffering. Alderman
Kot indicated that he was reluctantly in favor of the rezoning however he felt it was stepping back
to grant the R-4 zoning and he had public safety issues. He supported new language in the
agreement and moving it ahead.
Dave Williams, 1307 Willow Way, addressed the Council. He expressed his concern regarding
the rezoning of the property and the increase in density. He noted that the Planning Commission
voted unanimously against the PUD amendment by a vote of 9-1. He questioned if the developer
has presented a new final plat. Attorney Kramer explained the process of the change and
indicated that if the developer is granted the zoning change,he would have to resubmit new site
plans and plats. Mr. Williams also commented on the flood plain and the market study done by
the developer. He stated that the concern the residents of Fox Hill has is that the area was
originally intended to be single-family and that is why they bought in the subdivision and the
rezoning now changes this.
Page 7of10
Alderman Sticka asked the audience what they felt was the problem with townhomes. Mr.
Williams indicated that he did not have a problem with townhomes and probably would live in
one some day however he paid premium for his lot after verifying that the area was zoned for
SFR and now there will be MFR behind his lot. Alderman James noted that with the current
proposal,there is a larger buffer area between Mr. Williams' lot and the townhomes. Alderman
Sticka also noted that the current Fox Hill subdivision is prominent with townhomes.
Resident Rose Lederman(Willow Way) stated that when she purchased her home, she was also
told there would be SFR behind her on the other side of the creek. She stated that she felt that the
rug was pulled out from under her with the rezoning. She also expressed her concern about the
area becoming a rental area as she felt that units currently in Fox Hill are being rented. Greg
Ingemunson, board member of the HOA for the townhomes in Fox Hill, stated that they have
passed an amendment to their by-laws stating that the units cannot be rented out.
Alderman Sticka stated that the comment has been made that if the City knew ten years ago what
it knows today,the area would have been planned for townhomes. Mayor Prochaska noted that
with the changes to Eldamain Road,the City is trying to find the best solution to make the area
work that will also help maintain the value of property in the area. Mayor Prochaska also noted
that the townhomes are subject to architectural standards such as 50%brick on the front of the
buildings and the minimum square footage is above what is required. These standards help to
create an upscale development.
Resident Tammy Gesinger stated that she would like to see the City limit the number of
townhomes in Yorkville. Mayor Prochaska explained that the areas of MFR usually develop next
to commercial areas and he noted that MFR are part of planned developments where there are
also SFR being built.
Mr. Williams asked if the developer has submitted architectural plans yet. He felt the Council
should see what the area will look like before approving the rezoning. Attorney Kramer stated
that the architectural plans are not qualifications for entering into a PUD agreement. The
developer may not be the end builder of the development. The City has requested architectural
designs and the developer agreed. She stated that the developer will have to receive site plan
approval and architectural renderings will be required at that time. Mayor Prochaska noted that
there are architectural standards in the PUD Agreement to address this concern.
Joe Foerner, 4255 Eldamain Road, expressed his concern that the development will affect his
agricultural property where he has horses. His stated that people may want to come and pet his
horses and he wanted to know how he could protect both his animals and the people who
approach them. Mayor Prochaska stated that there will not be a backyard or play area adjacent to
his property from this development; a buffer area and open space will be between his property
and the homes. He stated that there is a similar situation on the south side of the City were the
developer was required to construct a buffer berm with plantings that discouraged people from
going over it. He stated that similar language could be included in this agreement. Alderman
Besco stated that he asked the developer to address this because he was aware that Mr. Foerner
had horses on his property and the developer was open to this. Attorney Kramer stated that there
is language in the agreement addressing the landscape buffer. She also stated that City Planner
Mike Schoppe was consulted regarding the buffer and it is planned to be the type of buffer
required between differing zoning classifications. Alderman Besco also asked if the there was
right to farm language in the agreement and Attorney Kramer indicated that this language is on
the final plat for the whole subdivision.
Page 8 of 10
There was no further discussion.
Rob Roy Falls- Concept Plan
Art Daniels, president of the Sexton Companies,addressed the Council. He indicated that Sexton
family has owned the property for about thirty years. It is located north of Veterans Parkway
(Route 34),west of Cannonball Trail and east of Eldamain Road. The long-time tenants of the
property are Dorothy and Wayne Cruise who maintain the property. He turned the presentation
over to Stephen Yas of Yas/Fischel Partnership.
Mr. Yas stated that the spirit of this development is to keep with the identity of the existing
community. He noted the following about the development:
o Fifteen acres of the existing farm is planned to be restored and used as an educational
facility. There will also be horse boarding available for use on the bridle paths planned.
o The existing architecture of the historic areas has been researched and this style will be
reflected in the buildings planned for the area. The developer will maintain architectural
control.
o 80% of the site will be open space or prairie restoration land. A conservation landscape
architect will also be working with the developer on designing the site.
o The entrance to the development is planned to be across from the Sycamore Street
entrance to the Fox Hill subdivision across Route 34.
o The natural lowlands of the property are planned to be wet detention areas; ponds with
prairie grass. There is 34.4 acres of detention.
o Along Route 34 there will be a retail area with offices or condominiums over the
commercial area. Parking will be behind the buildings and the style will appear similar to
the existing downtown area. Depending on the hydrology of the area,there may be
parking below grade,under the buildings. He noted that they have done a similar project
in Willow Springs, Illinois.
o Townhomes with alleys are planned behind the retail area. There will be parallel parking
on one side of the street. Garages,parking areas and garbage pick-up will be in 60' alleys
behind the buildings. There will be 183' between townhomes which will have a 14' front
yard, 5' side yards and 10' of parking.
o 5,000 square foot condos are also planned for the site with alleys behind these buildings.
o There will be a HOA clubhouse and pool. A park with baseball and soccer fields is
planned along with sandy beach areas along the retention pond.
o The plan is for 33 SFR on 15,000 square foot lots; 87 SFR on 12,000 square foot lots; 59
5,000 square foot condos, 240 townhomes and 115 condos over the commercial area
which may be reduced by office units.
Mr. Daniels asked the Council if they had any issues or concerns. Mayor Prochaska explained to
the Council that this concept plan was presented to the Planning Commission and the majority of
the Commission was intrigued by the concept. The Commission questioned how the 5,000 square
foot condo sites would work and the alleys.
Alderman James reported that the concept was also presented to the Park Board. He noted that
there were details to be worked out but overall the feedback was positive. The Board was happy
to see this concept. Alderman James thanked Mr. Daniels for bringing in a concept that is
different from other subdivisions.
Alderman James asked if only one condo would be on the 5,000 sq. ft. lots or would it be
multiple units. Mr. Yas stated one unit with one family would be on each 5,000 sq. ft. site.
Alderman James asked how many stories the retail buildings would have. Mr. Yas indicated that
Page 9 of 10
they will be three to four story buildings. Mr. Yas stated that townhomes will be probably two to
three stories and the homes are two to two and a half stories tall. Alderman James asked if the
retail would look similar to the existing downtown. Mr. Yas stated that the objection is to have it
similar; an updated version. Mr. Daniels noted that they are working with the Yorkville
Economic Development Corporation to address what type of businesses would be attracted to the
area. Mr. Yas noted that they have done demographic studies and real estate profiles and the
information indicates that this type of project will work in Yorkville.
Alderman Sticka asked where the development they referred to is in Willow Springs and if it had
the alley concept. Mr. Yas stated that Willow Springs Village Center is on Archer Avenue and
Willow Springs Road and it does have the alley concept. Mr.Yas also noted that they are
working in Plainfield developing condos over retail.
There were no further questions or comments. Mayor Prochaska thanked Mr. Yas and Mr.
Daniels for their presentation.
PC 2004-04 Villas at the Preserve—Concept Plan
Chris Lannert addressed the Council. He noted that the concept plan has been reviewed by both
the Planning Commission and the Park Board. Mr. Lannert outlined the development:
o The site is approximately 24 acres located south of Route 71 and east of Route 47
adjacent to the Shell station and surrounded by the Forest Preserve. The development
will consist of 42 lots for 84 duplexes on 12,000 sq. ft. lots.
o There are two different swales on the site which will be worked into the plan.
o The main entrance and single point of access will be across Route 71 from the entrance of
Sunflower Estates.
o There will be 25%open space and the developer is working with the Park Board and
Forest Preserve District in regards to a walkway. 1.98 acres will be dedicated for parks.
o There will be buffers along the commercial property.
o There will be a stub to the adjoining Forest Preserve Road.
Mr. Lannert displayed a prototype of the duplexes.
Alderman Sticka asked how the Fire Depai Intent felt about the single entrance. Mayor Prochaska
noted that at the Planning Commission it was discussed to get an access easement to the east. Mr.
Lannert stated he is investigating the easement to the Shell property. Attorney Kramer stated that
Planning Commission Chairman Tom Lindblom was happy with the divided access to the
subdivision.
Alderman James asked what the lot sizes were. Mr. Lannert stated that the minimum lot size 80'
by 150' which is 12,000 sq. ft. The average lot is probably going to be around 13, 050 sq. ft.
Mayor Prochaska noted that the standard is 15,000 sq. ft. Attorney Kramer stated that when the
Planning Commission saw the architectural rendering which appears as a large home rather than a
duplex and heard the willingness to follow architectural guidelines in the PUD,they were
comfortable with the concept.
There were no further comments or questions. Mayor Prochaska thanked the developer for the
presentation.
Additional Business
Mayor Prochaska stated in the interest of moving on to the following City Council meeting,
additional business would be held until later.
Page 10 of 10
Administrator Graff asked if some of the items discussed could be placed on the Consent Agenda.
Attorney Kramer stated that if the Council approved,this could be done.
Mayor Prochaska adjourned the meeting and gave a five minute break before beginning the City
Council meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 P.M.
Minutes submitted by Jackie Milschewski, City Clerk
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE r ;) PAGE: 1
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
ABACUS ABACUS/ATLAS, INC.
15412 04/16/04 01 PD-REPAIR SCALE & CERTIFY 0121062005408 00302542 05/11/04 444 .84
INVOICE TOTAL: 444 .84
VENDOR TOTAL: 444 .84
AKKRAMER ATTORNEY DANIEL J. KRAMER
$1. 6M DEBT CERT 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-HYDRAULIC INTERCEPTOR 3700075007502 05/11/04 900.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 900.00
04/21/04 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-RUNGE ANNEXATION 0100013001372 05/11/04 190.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 190.00
3.5M GEN OBBOND 04/23/04 01 ATTY FEES APRIL 2004 3700075007503 05/11/04 1, 050.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 1,050.00
BROWNFIELD 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-BROWNFIELD 0111061005300 05/11/04 205.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 205.00
BRUELL LIFT STA 04/23/04 01 ATTY SERVICES APRIL 2004 3700075007504 05/11/04 735.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 735.00
CAN HILLS 04/23/04 01 CANNONBALL HILLS ZONING 0100013001372 05/11/04 180.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 180.00
CORLANDS 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-HYDRUALIC 7200075007326 05/11/04 692.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 692.00
CORNERSTONE 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-CORNERSTONE 0100013001372 05/11/04 1, 322. 14
INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 322.14
COUNTRY HILLS 04/23/04 01 ATTY SERVICES APRIL 2004 7200075007302 05/11/04 200.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 200.00
CSIDE CTR GREEN 04/23/04 01 ATTY SERVICES APRIL 2004 3700075007503 05/11/04 110.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 110.00 I
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2
TIME: 21:34:09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
AKKRAMER ATTORNEY DANIEL J. KRAMER
FACADE 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-FACADE / APPEAR. ORD 0111061005300 05/11/04 70.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 70.00
FOX HILL P9, 10 04/23/04 01 FOX HILL PODS 9 & 10 0100013001372 05/11/04 1,250.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 250.00
FOX HILL U7 04/23/04 01 FOX HILL UNIT 7 0100013001372 05/11/04 75.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 75.00
GO-TANS 04/21/04 01 GO-TANE PROGRESSIVE HOLDINGS 0100013001372 05/11/04 910.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 910.00
GILBERT PURCH. 04/23/04 01 LEGAL SVC APRIL 2004 7300065005808 05/11/04 270.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 270.00
GOV AGMT 04/23/04 01 FOX METRO AGMT, ATTY SVC 4/04 3700065005800 05/11/04 525.00
02 JUR XFER OF ELDEMAIN RD LGL 0111061005300 230.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 755.00
GRIESMAN EASE 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-BRUELL ST INTERCEPTOR 3700075007504 05/11/04 355.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 355.00
HEARTLAND 04/21/04 Ol ATTORNEY-LITIGATION STORMWATER 0122061005300 05/11/04 5, 150.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 5, 150.00
HOOVER-BOYSCOUT 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-BOY SCOUT 0111061005300 05/11/04 200.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 200.00
INSURANCE CLAIM 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-WORKMAN'S COMP CLAIM 0111061005300 05/11/04 230.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 230.00
KYLYN'S CROSSIN 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-KYLYN'S CROSSING 0100013001372 05/11/04 75.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 75.00
LAND CASH ORD 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-LAND CASH ORDINANCE 0111061005300 05/11/04 200.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 200.00
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
AKKRAMER ATTORNEY DANIEL J. KRAMER
LIQUOR ORDINANC 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-LIQUOR ORDINANCE 0111061005300 05/11/04 140.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 140.00
MENARDS 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-MENDARDS RESIDENT ZON 0100013001372 05/11/04 300.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00
MPI-MOSER 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-GRANDE RESERVE ZONING 0100013001372 05/11/04 1, 400.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 400.00
NELSON LANDFILL 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-NELSON LANDFILL 0111061005300 05/11/04 380.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 380.00
PK BD/REC DEPT 04/23/04 01 LGL SVC PARK BD/REC DEPT 0122061005300 05/11/04 200.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 200.00
POLLUTION CTROL 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-POLLUTION CONTROL ORD 0111061005300 05/11/04 350.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 350.00
POST OFFICE 04/21/04 01 POST OFFICE SITING 0111061005300 05/11/04 1, 390.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 390.00
RIVER'S EDGE 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-RIVER'S EDGE 0100013001372 05/11/04 97.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 97.00
SPRINT TOWER 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-WATER TOWER LEASE 5100061005300 05/11/04 550.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 550.00
TANGLEWOOD 04/23/04 01 TANGLEWOOD TRAILS 0100013001372 05/11/04 1, 140.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 140.00
UTILITY AUDIT 04/21/04 01 UTILITY AUDIT 0111061005300 05/11/04 50.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00
WATER TOWER 04/21/04 01 WATER EASEMENTS-NORTH TOWER 4100061005300 05/11/04 695.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 695.00
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
AKKRAMER ATTORNEY DANIEL J. KRAMER
WCC-CONOVER 04/21/04 01 ATTORNEY-CONOVER PROPERTY 0111061005300 05/11/04 360.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 360.00
WESTBURY 04/21/04 01 WESTBURY ZONING & ANNEXATION 0100013001372 05/11/04 610.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 610.00
WINDETT RIDGE 04/21/04 01 WINDETT RIDGE SSA BOND AGREE 0100013001372 05/11/04 225.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 225.00
WOODWORTH 04/21/04 01 EASEMENTS-BRUELL ST PROJECT 3700075007504 05/11/04 925.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 925.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 23, 936.14
ALOHA ALOHA COFFEE COMPANY
0000040-IN 04/15/04 01 APPRECIATION DINNER 0111064005607 05/11/04 53.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 53.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 53.00
AROWUNI ARROW UNIFORM RENTAL
03-364115 04/19/04 01 FLOOR MAT CLEANING 1600075007203 05/11/04 30.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 30.00
03-367130 04/29/04 01 FLOOR MAT CLEANING 1600075007203 05/11/04 30.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 30.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 60.00
ATT AT&T
04/13/04 04/13/04 01 TELEPHONE 0111062005436 05/11/04 36.12
02 TELEPHONE 0121062005436 36.12
03 TELEPHONE 5100062005436 36.12
INVOICE TOTAL: 108.36
VENDOR TOTAL: 108 .36
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5
I TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
BCBS BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
092465 04/14/04 Ol MAY 2004 HEALTH INSURANCE 0111050005203 05/11/04 43, 392. 64
INVOICE TOTAL: 43, 392. 64
VENDOR TOTAL: 43, 392. 64
BEHRB BEHRENS, BRETT
042604 04/26/04 01 VISION REIMBURSEMENT 0111050005205 05/11/04 314 .80
INVOICE TOTAL: 314 .80
VENDOR TOTAL: 314 .80
BEHRD BEHRENS, DAVID
042104 04/21/04 01 DENTAL REIMBURSEMENT 0111050005205 05/11/04 110.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 110.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 110.00
BIKED BRISTOL KENDALL FIRE DEPART.
MAR/APR 04/30/04 01 MARCH & APRIL FEES 9500078009010 05/11/04 24, 450.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 24, 450.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 24, 450.00
BRENART BRENART EYE CLINIC
409645 04/26/04 01 EYE INJURY - MOORE 5100065005800 05/11/04 67.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 67 .00
VENDOR TOTAL: 67 .00
CINTAS CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY
0343211046 04/14/04 01 FILL PUB WORKS MED CABINET 5200075007004 00201877 05/11/04 71.52
INVOICE TOTAL: 71.52
0343211048 04/14/04 01 WIPES, CREAM, PAIN RELIEF, EYE 0121065005804 00302537 05/11/04 43.50
INVOICE TOTAL: 43.50
VENDOR TOTAL: 115.02
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6
RT
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
COLORFST COLORFAST
1006 04/27/04 01 M4, M13 PAINT REPAIRS 0121062005408 00302353 05/11/04 300.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 300.00
COMDIR COMMUNICATIONS DIRECT INC
62052 04/19/04 01 VEH 8, 11 DECK LT, CAM XPONDER 0121062005409 00302518 05/11/04 110.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 110.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 110.00
COMED COMMONWEALTH EDISON
1887036018 03/31/04 01 MARCH CONCESSION STAND ELEC 1600075007200 05/11/04 119.06
INVOICE TOTAL: 119.06
VENDOR TOTAL: 119.06
CONDESGN CONSERVATION DESIGN FORUM
0003078 04/07/04 01 UNDESSER PROP SITE PLAN REVIEW 0100013001372 05/11/04 93.75
INVOICE TOTAL: 93.75
0003079 04/07/04 01 GR RESERVE PLAN REVIEW 0100013001372 05/11/04 3, 648 .75
INVOICE TOTAL: 3, 648.75
0003080 04/07/04 01 STORMWATER ORD. DEVELOPMENT 0122062005401 05/11/04 1, 125.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 125.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 4, 867.50
DELAND DELANEY, DAVID
DENTAL 04/26/04 04/28/04 01 DENTAL CARE 0111050005205 05/11/04 97.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 97.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 97.00
DEPO DEPO COURT REPORTING SERVICE
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
DEPO DEPO COURT REPORTING SERVICE
10943 04/26/04 01 MINUTE TAKING 0111062005401 05/11/04 319. 60
INVOICE TOTAL: 319. 60
VENDOR TOTAL: 319. 60
DEUCHEN DEUCHLER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
4053 03/31/04 01 YR RADIUM SLUDGE SAMPLING 4100061005401 05/11/04 1, 138 .13
INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 138.13
VENDOR TOTAL: 1, 138. 13
DEUCLER DEUCHLER, WALTER E. ASSOC.
10903 03/31/04 01 MARCH ENG. SVC C'SIDE INTERCEP 3700062005402 05/11/04 6, 922.21
INVOICE TOTAL: 6, 922.21
10904 03/31/04 01 C'SIDE GREENSPACE ENG. FEES 3700062005402 05/11/04 736.43
INVOICE TOTAL: 736.43
10905 03/31/04 01 ENGINEERING-HYDRAULIC INTERCPT 3700062005406 05/11/04 7, 101.42
INVOICE TOTAL: 7, 101.42
10906 03/31/04 01 MARCH ENG. SVC BRUELL ST. FM 3700062005405 05/11/04 664 .98
INVOICE TOTAL: 664 .98
VENDOR TOTAL: 15,425.04
DLT DLT SOLUTIONS, INC.
193369 04/13/04 01 AUTOCAD LT 2005 SUBSCRIPTION 0115065005801 05/11/04 350.00
02 AUTOCAD LT 0115062005410 362.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 712.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 712 .00
EIU EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
04/19/04 04/19/04 01 2003 IL MUN TREASURERS POWELL 0111064005604 05/11/04 285.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 285.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 285.00
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
1
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
FARREN FARREN HEATING & COOLING
3065 04/19/04 01 REPAIR CITY HALL A/C 1600075007204 05/11/04 255.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 255.00
3076 04/27/04 01 CITY HALL REPAIR-AIR CONDITION 1600075007204 05/11/04 730.74
INVOICE TOTAL: 730.74
VENDOR TOTAL: 985.74
FIRST FIRST PLACE RENTAL
FP144604 03/31/04 01 3 STREET BROOMS 0141065005815 00201823 05/11/04 48.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 48 .00
VENDOR TOTAL: 48.00
FOXRIVER FOX RIVER STUDY GROUP
042804 04/28/04 01 WATER STUDY PH2 PYMT 4100065005800 05/11/04 1, 550.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 1,550.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 1,550.00
FOXVALLY FOX VALLEY SEWER SERVICES INC
2003-1531 03/31/04 01 ROD BASEMENT PIPES 1600075007203 00302517 05/11/04 145.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 145.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 145.00
GENEVA GENEVA CONSTUCTION
44551 04/15/04 01 12.3 TONS COLD PATCH 1500075007110 00201874 05/11/04 996.30
INVOICE TOTAL: 996.30
VENDOR TOTAL: 996.30
GRTAMLES GREATAMERICA LEASING CORP.
3771416 04/22/04 01 MONTHLY COPIER LEASE 0111062005412 05/11/04 1, 616.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 616.00
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
GRTAMLES GREATAMERICA LEASING CORP.
3786961 04/28/04 01 PW COPIER LEASE 5100062005408 05/11/04 140.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 140.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 1, 756.00
HELLANDJ HELLAND, JONATHON
042004 04/20/04 01 VISION REIMBURSEMENT 0111050005205 05/11/04 150.85
INVOICE TOTAL: 150.85
VENDOR TOTAL: 150.85
HENNE HENNE CONSTRUCTION & ELECTRIC
041604 04/16/04 01 24029: LIGHT AT 47/71 0141062005414 00201831 05/11/04 50.00
02 23990: 34/47 2 LT HEAD REPLACE 0141062005414 560.40
03 23935: 34/47 1 LT HEAD REPLACE 0141062005414 331.70
04 24004 : 551 GARDEN DR EMERGENCY 0141062005414 253.00
05 24045: 1901 CANDLEBERRY ST LT 0141062005415 140.50
06 24043: MDWVIEW/YELLOW ST LT 0141062005415 87.78
07 24038: 47/SHELL ENTRANCE LT 0141062005415 311.50
08 24040: 34/47 BULB REPLACE 0141062005415 75.00
09 24041: 965 HEARTLAND PHOTOCELL 0141062005415 75.28
INVOICE TOTAL: 1,885.16
VENDOR TOTAL: 1,885.16
HOGAN HOGAN WALKER, LLC
041604 04/16/04 01 355565: 3 FILTER ELEMENTS 0141062005408 00201825 05/11/04 45.75
02 355570: 1 FILTER ELEMENT 0141062005408 6.50
03 355571: 1 LAMP 0141062005408 35.75
INVOICE TOTAL: 88.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 88.00
HOULA HOULE, ANTHONY
04/28/04 04/28/04 01 VISION ASSISTANCE 0111050005205 05/11/04 154 .00
INVOICE TOTAL: 154 .00
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
HOULA HOULE, ANTHONY
04/29/2004 04/29/04 01 VISION CARE REIMBURSEMENT 0111050005205 05/11/04 100.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 100.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 254 .00
ICMA INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTY MGMT
SGN38668304 04/07/04 01 SUB RENEWAL SMART GROWTH NETWK 0111064005600 05/11/04 29.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 29.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 29.00
ILMA ILMA
042004 04/20/04 01 J MOORE MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 5100065005804 00201786 05/11/04 20.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 20.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 20.00
ILMUNLEG ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
MARTIN REGISTER 04/29/04 01 CREATE YOUTH/ADULT PARTNERS 0121064005604 05/11/04 65.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 65.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 65.00
JOLSUSP JOLIET SUSPENSION, INC
56613 04/27/04 01 M-12, REPLACE 2 REAR COILS 0121062005408 00302552 05/11/04 175.88
INVOICE TOTAL: 175.88
VENDOR TOTAL: 175.88
KOPY KOPY KAT COPIER
31236 04/29/04 01 SERVICE FAX MACHINE B & Z 0122065005809 05/11/04 95.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 95.00
47338 04/12/04 01 COLOR COPIER COPIES & SUPPLIES 5100065005809 05/11/04 3,000.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 3,000.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 3,095.00
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11
TIME: 21:34:09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
LANDMRK LANDMARK AUTOMOTIVE
04/28/04 04/28/04 01 M-12 ROTATE TIRES 0121062005409 05/11/04 17.95
02 M-1 COIL 0121062005409 84.84
INVOICE TOTAL: 102.79
VENDOR TOTAL: 102.79
LAWSON LAWSON PRODUCTS
1945458 04/19/04 01 STREET MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 0141075005419 00201872 05/11/04 584 .29
INVOICE TOTAL: 584 .29
VENDOR TOTAL: 584 .29
LOGOMAX LOGOMAX
505382 03/25/04 01 3 POLO, 3 SPORT SCHWARTZKOPF 0121062005421 00302546 05/11/04 153.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 153.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 153.00
MEADE MEADE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
315048, 615163 04/23/04 01 47/C'BALL, 34/MC HUGH MAINT 0141062005414 00201876 05/11/04 681.04
INVOICE TOTAL: 681.04
VENDOR TOTAL: 681.04
MENARDS MENARDS INC.
95840 04/07/04 01 OUTLETS, WIRE, CONNECTORS 0141065005804 05/11/04 47.33
INVOICE TOTAL: 47 .33
95873 04/07/04 01 GATORGRIP SOCKET SET 0141065005804 05/11/04 14 .38
INVOICE TOTAL: 14 .38
96021 04/08/04 01 4PK VIVA PAPER TOWELS 0141065005804 05/11/04 31.12
INVOICE TOTAL: 31.12
98586 04/22/04 01 1-POLE BREAKER, 90* CONNECTOR 0141065005804 05/11/04 10.08
INVOICE TOTAL: 10.08
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12
TIME: 21:34:09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
MENARDS MENARDS INC.
98589 04/22/04 01 5/16" QUICK LINK 0141065005804 05/11/04 3.99
INVOICE TOTAL: 3. 99
VENDOR TOTAL: 106.90
METEOR METEORLOGIX
10664376 04/16/04 01 WEATHER RADAR SUBSCRIPTION 0141075007004 00201873 05/11/04 1, 116.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 116.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 1, 116.00
METLIFE METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CENTER
BGGRO979840001 05/03/04 01 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUMS 0111050005204 05/11/04 2, 478.45
INVOICE TOTAL: 2, 478.45
VENDOR TOTAL: 2, 478.45
NEMRT NORTH EAST MULTI-REGIONAL
51144 04/25/04 01 S. FRIDDLE 40HR JUVENILE TEST 0121064005605 00302568 05/11/04 75.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 75.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 75.00
NEXTEL NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
MAR18-APR17 04/22/04 01 ADMIN/ENGINEERING CHARGES 0111062005438 05/11/04 293.38
02 STREETS DEPT. CHARGES 0141062005438 181.38
03 SEWER DEPT. CHARGES 5200062005438 97 .29
04 WATER DEPT. CHARGES 5100062005438 273.24
06 POLICE DEPT. CHARGES 0121062005438 552 .63
INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 397.92
VENDOR TOTAL: 1, 397.92
NICOR NICOR GAS
04/29/04 04/29/04 01 1 W. VAN EMMON 04/2004 BILL 0111078009002 05/11/04 178. 69
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
NICOR NICOR GAS
04/29/04 04/29/04 02 610 TOWER LN 04/2004 BILL 0111078009002 05/11/04 255.71
03 1 RT 47 04/2004 GAS BILL 0111078009002 241.31
04 131 E HYDRAULIC 04/2004 BILL 0111078009002 549.95
05 908 GAME FARM 04/2004 BILL 0111078009002 1, 192.28
INVOICE TOTAL: 2, 417.94
3-27-86-0360-4 04/12/04 01 610 TOWER LN GAS BILL 0111078009002 05/11/04 749.77
INVOICE TOTAL: 749.77
VENDOR TOTAL: 3, 167.71
OCSIGN O.C. SIGNWORKS
04/26/04 04/26/04 01 NUMBERED SIGNS ABOVE DOORS 1600075007204 05/11/04 293.54
INVOICE TOTAL: 293.54
VENDOR TOTAL: 293.54
OFFWORK OFFICE WORKS
527601 04/26/04 01 WHITE LINEN COVERS 0121065005804 00302550 05/11/04 30.87
INVOICE TOTAL: 30.87
VENDOR TOTAL: 30.87
OHERRCOM RAY O'HERRON COMPANY
18708 04/12/04 01 BIANCHI BELT LINER KLINGEL 0121062005421 00302519 05/11/04 23.95
INVOICE TOTAL: 23.95
VENDOR TOTAL: 23.95
OHERRON O'HERON, RAY
0413025-IN 04/19/04 01 2 K-9 SNARE POLES 0121065005804 00302512 05/11/04 169.25
INVOICE TOTAL: 169.25
VENDOR TOTAL: 169.25
OMALLEY O'MALLEY WELDING & FABRICATING
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14
TIME: 21:34:09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
OMALLEY O'MALLEY WELDING & FABRICATING
041604 04/16/04 01 STEEL 0141075005419 00201827 05/11/04 297. 67
INVOICE TOTAL: 297 . 67
10181 04/23/04 01 REPAIR WELD ON LT POLE FIXTURE 0141062005415 05/11/04 30.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 30.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 327.67
PAYLINE PAYLINE WEST, INC.
P55053 04/05/04 01 BARRIER, FRT IN/OUT 0141062005408 00201830 05/11/04 171.57
INVOICE TOTAL: 171.57
VENDOR TOTAL: 171.57
PFISTERR RALPH PFISTER
53 04/22/04 01 MATL, LABOR TO REPAIR DRIVEWAY 5100065005804 05/11/04 1,725.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 1,725.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 1,725.00
PITNEY PITNEY BOWES, INC.
4060068-MR04 03/23/04 01 QUARTERLY CHARGES 0111065005808 05/11/04 266.06
INVOICE TOTAL: 266.06
790858 04/15/04 01 EZ SEAL FOR POSTAGE MACHINE 0111065005808 05/11/04 28.89
INVOICE TOTAL: 28.89
VENDOR TOTAL: 294.95
PLECKD PLECKHAM, DAN
04/30/04 VISION 04/30/04 01 VISION BENEFITS REIMBURSEMENT 0111050005205 05/11/04 124 .00
INVOICE TOTAL: 124 .00
VENDOR TOTAL: 124.00
POSTNET POSTNET IL 124
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
POSTNET POSTNET IL 124
04/01/04 04/01/04 01 PRINTS & COPIES FEES 0122065005809 05/11/04 87.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 87.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 87.00
PROTECT PROTECTIVE PRODUCTS
0015985-IN 04/22/04 01 1 GLADIATOR VEST SCHWARTZKOPF 0121062005421 00302362 05/11/04 1, 520.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 520.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 1, 520.00
PTW & CO PTW & CO.
042904 04/29/04 01 8174: QTR GEN LEDGER SVC 0111061005305 05/11/04 303.25
02 BANK SVC RFP, COLLATERAL AGMT 0111061005305 1,248.75
03 8228: GASB 34 IMPLEMENTATION 0111061005308 596.13
INVOICE TOTAL: 2, 148.13
VENDOR TOTAL: 2, 148.13
PYRAMID PYRAMID SCHOOL PRODUCTS
04/29/04 04/29/04 01 PD JOINT PURCHASING PO 102085 0121065005804 05/11/04 23.30
INVOICE TOTAL: 23.30
VENDOR TOTAL: 23.30
QUILL QUILL CORPORATION
04/26/04 04/26/04 01 BIND MACHINE, BINDERS, COVERS 0121065005804 00302549 05/11/04 473.95
INVOICE TOTAL: 473.95
7622073 03/29/04 01 5 PKS POST CARDS FOR UTIL BILL 5100065005804 00102117 05/11/04 49.45
INVOICE TOTAL: 49.45
7981979 04/15/04 01 LEGAL HANG FLDRS/BINDER CLIPS 0122065005804 05/11/04 98.47
INVOICE TOTAL: 98.47
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
QUILL QUILL CORPORATION
8199198 04/27/04 01 FILE POCKETS, EASTERNER FOLDER 0115065005801 00102128 05/11/04 108.86
INVOICE TOTAL: 108 .86
8200094 04/27/04 01 PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE SUPPLIES 5100065005804 05/11/04 46.72
INVOICE TOTAL: 46.72
VENDOR TOTAL: 777.45
RESOURCE RESOURCE ONE
7443992 04/14/04 01 EMPLOYMENT APPLICATIONS 0111065005804 00102119 05/11/04 119.80
INVOICE TOTAL: 119.80
VENDOR TOTAL: 119.80
RIVEROAK RIVER OAKS FORD
041604 04/16/04 01 FORD F-350 REPAIRS 0141062005409 00201828 05/11/04 170.44
INVOICE TOTAL: 170.44
VENDOR TOTAL: 170.44
S&S S & S WORLDWIDE
04/29/04 04/29/04 01 PD JOINT PURCHASING PO 102088 0121065005804 05/11/04 27 .64
INVOICE TOTAL: 27.64
VENDOR TOTAL: 27. 64
SAFEKLN SAFETY KLEEN
0025875381 04/14/04 01 OIL, CHEMICAL DISPOSAL 5100062005408 00201875 05/11/04 135.15
INVOICE TOTAL: 135.15
VENDOR TOTAL: 135.15
SAFTYSYS SAFETY SYSTEMS CORPORATION
26496 04/16/04 01 SPEEDLOADERS, SLINGS, SAFETY 0121065005804 00302541 05/11/04 348.54
INVOICE TOTAL: 348.54
VENDOR TOTAL: 348.54
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
SAGECONT SAGE CONTROL ORDNANCE, INC
8120 04/22/04 01 50 STANDARD ENERGY BATONS 2000065005811 00302528 05/11/04 1, 126.20
INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 126.20
VENDOR TOTAL: 1, 126.20
SALISM SAILSBURY, MARGARET
4/25/04 04/25/04 01 3 CLEAN PUBLIC WORKS 0141062005401 00201870 05/11/04 150.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 150.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 150.00
SBC SBC
04/16/04 04/16/04 01 MARCH TELEPHONE CHARGES 0121062005436 05/11/04 427.09
02 MARCH TELEPHONE CHARGES 0111062005436 427.09
03 MARCH TELEPHONE CHARGES 5100062005436 427.08
INVOICE TOTAL: 1,281.26
309T37670804 04/10/04 01 TELEPHONE CHARGES 0111062005436 05/11/04 0.49
INVOICE TOTAL: 0.49
630R06126904 04/16/04 01 FIRE ALARM 0111062005436 05/11/04 11.50
02 FIRE ALARM 5100062005436 11.51
03 FIRE ALARM 0121062005436 11.50
INVOICE TOTAL: 34 .51
708Z91100104 04/16/04 01 ALARM CIRCUIT 5100062005436 05/11/04 67. 64
INVOICE TOTAL: 67. 64
VENDOR TOTAL: 1, 383.90
SERVMASC SERVICEMASTER COMMERCIAL
122950ADM 04/29/04 01 MONTHLY CLEANING CITY OFFICES 0111062005406 05/11/04 550.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 550.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 550.00
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE 4 INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR 4 DATE 4 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT 4 P.O. 4 DUE DATE ITEM AMT
SHOREGAL SHORE GALLERIES, INC.
83026 04/21/04 01 7K RDS .223-CAL AMMO 0121065005813 00302527 05/11/04 948.43
INVOICE TOTAL: 948.43
83027 04/21/04 01 9K RDS 40-CAL TRAINING AMMO 0121065005813 00302526 05/11/04 1,009.71
02 2K RDS 45-AUTO TRAINING AMMO 0121065005813 263.76
03 1K RDS 40-CAL DUTY AMMO 2000065005811 198.88
INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 472.35
VENDOR TOTAL: 2, 420.78
SHREDCO SHRED-CO
21109537 04/20/04 01 PD - 38 UNITS SHREDDED 0121062005408 00302545 05/11/04 239.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 239.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 239.00
SLEEZERS SLEEZER, SCOTT
041404 04/14/04 01 DENTAL AND VISION CARE 0111050005205 05/11/04 485.80
INVOICE TOTAL: 485.80
VENDOR TOTAL: 485.80
SMALENG SMALL ENGINE EMPORIUM
031704 03/17/04 01 CHAIN SHARPENING 0141062005408 05/11/04 90.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 90.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 90.00
SOFT SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE
108178 04/13/04 01 HP WORKSTATION 0111075007002 05/11/04 999.00
02 MS OFFICE XP PROFESSIONAL 0111075007002 1, 089.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 2,088.00
108181 04/16/04 01 UB CLERK - 17" VE175 MONITOR 5100075007002 05/11/04 569.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 569.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 2, 657.00
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
STRYPES STRYPES PLUS MORE INC.
8663 04/26/04 01 ADD K-9 MARKING ON SQUAD CAR 0121062005408 00302551 05/11/04 105.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 105.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 105.00
SWITHINS SWITHIN, SUE
042704 04/27/04 01 DENTAL REIMBURSEMENT 0111050005205 05/11/04 952 .00
INVOICE TOTAL: 952.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 952.00
TAPCO TRAFFIC & PARKING CONTROL INC
04/15/04 04/15/04 01 196547: 2 CHEVRON SIGNS 1500075007007 00201871 05/11/04 47.90
02 196561: 1 BRACKET 1500075007007 20.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 67.90
VENDOR TOTAL: 67.90
THOMWEST THOMPSON WEST
806407053 04/06/04 01 IL CRIMINAL LAW, PROCEDURES 0121064005603 00302540 05/11/04 38.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 38.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 38.00
THREESIS THREE SISTERS AND A FRIEND
1940 MAP 03/23/04 01 CITY 1940 MAP FRAMED 1600075007204 00102121 05/11/04 331 .00
INVOICE TOTAL: 331.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 331.00
UNIFIED UNIFIED SUPPLY
0090800-IN 04/27/04 01 WIRE, CONDUIT, WINGNUTS 0141065005804 05/11/04 38.16
INVOICE TOTAL: 38.16
VENDOR TOTAL: 38.16
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
UNIVMAD UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
635909 04/20/04 01 MUNI. ENG SEMINAR - ENG ASST 0115064005604 00101734 05/11/04 695.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 695.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 695.00
UPSIL UPS
00004296X2164 04/17/04 01 POSTAGE & SHIPPING 5100065005808 05/11/04 46.05
INVOICE TOTAL: 46.05
00004296X2174 04/24/04 01 POSTAGE AND SHIPPING COSTS 5100065005808 05/11/04 41.15
INVOICE TOTAL: 41.15
VENDOR TOTAL: 87.20
VESCO VESCO
22021 04/19/04 01 K-SUN LABELING TAPE 0111065005802 05/11/04 48.21
INVOICE TOTAL: 48.21
VENDOR TOTAL: 48.21
WELDSTAR WELDSTAR
918422 03/24/04 01 CYLINDER BALANCE 0141065005804 00201829 05/11/04 5.80
INVOICE TOTAL: 5.80
VENDOR TOTAL: 5.80
WHOUSED WAREHOUSE DIRECT
04/29/04 04/29/04 01 PD JOINT PURCHASING PAYMENT 0121065005804 05/11/04 19.92
INVOICE TOTAL: 19.92
VENDOR TOTAL: 19.92
WILLIAMA WILLIAMS, ANNETTE
04/30/04 DENTAL 04/30/04 01 DENTAL REIMBURSEMENT 0111050005205 05/11/04 67 .00
INVOICE TOTAL: 67.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 67.00
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21
TIME: 21:34:09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
WOODJ WOODRICK, JENNIFER
042704 04/27/04 01 MILEAGE REIMB - SEMINAR 0115064005605 05/11/04 106.50
INVOICE TOTAL: 106.50
VENDOR TOTAL: 106.50
WYETH WYETH, HEITZ & BROMBEREK
040104 04/01/04 01 SWANSON PROJECT REVIEW, MTGS 0100013001372 05/11/04 1, 080.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 1,080.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 1,080.00
YBSD YORKVILLE BRISTOL
FEB/MAR/APR 02/01/04 01 FEB-APRIL 12TH PAYMENTS 9500078009008 05/11/04 239,254 .06
INVOICE TOTAL: 239,254.06
VENDOR TOTAL: 239,254.06
YOLIBRAR YORKVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY
MAR/APR 04/30/04 01 MARCH & APRIL DEV FEES 9500078009009 05/11/04 13, 500.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 13, 500.00
PPRT-MARCH 04/30/04 01 MARCH PPRT 0100040004010 05/11/04 174 .79
INVOICE TOTAL: 174.79
VENDOR TOTAL: 13, 674.79
YOPDPET YORKVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
042304 04/23/04 01 GASOLINE OFFICER HELLAND 0121064005605 05/11/04 5.00
02 SOLICITOR BGROUND CHECK 0121065005804 12.00
03 SOLICITOR BGROUND CHECK 0121065005804 12.00
04 REC EMPLOYEE BGROUND CHECK 0100013001372 12 .00
05 4 EMPL. BGROUND CHECKS 0121065005804 48.00
06 DUNKIN DONUTS JUVENILE MTG 0121064005605 24 .83
07 MEALS MARTIN/SCHWARTZKOPF 0121064005605 16. 67
INVOICE TOTAL: 130.50
VENDOR TOTAL: 130.50
DATE: 05/04/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22
TIME: 21:34 :09 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ID: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/11/2004
INVOICE 4 INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
YOSCHOL YORKVILLE SCHOOL DIST #115
MAR/APR 04/30/04 01 MARCH & APRIL LAND CASH 9500078009011 05/11/04 94, 920.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 94, 920.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 94, 920.00
YOUNGM YOUNG, MARLYS
04/15/04 04/15/04 01 MINUTE TAKING 0111062005401 05/11/04 130.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 130.00
COW 4/20/04 04/26/04 01 COW 4/20/04 MINUTES 0111062005401 05/11/04 55.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 55.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 185.00
YRKAUTO YORKVILLE AUTO PARTS
646705 04/28/04 01 TOUCH UP, WASHER SOLVENT 0121062005409 05/11/04 12.85
INVOICE TOTAL: 12.85
VENDOR TOTAL: 12.85
YRKSTORG YORKVILLE SELF STORAGE, INC
MAY 2004 04/27/04 01 MAY STORAGE, SPACES 76, 83 1600075007203 05/11/04 150.00
INVOICE TOTAL: 150.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 150.00
TOTAL ALL INVOICES: 507, 121.98
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
PAYROLL SUMMARY
PAY PERIOD ENDING 04/17/04
SOCIAL
REGULAR OVERTIME TOTAL SECURITY IMRF TOTALS
ADMINISTRATION $14,423.41 $0.00 $14,423.41 $1,103.39 $1,412.25 $16,939.05
ENGINEERING $7,313.60 $0.00 $7,313.60 $559.50 $736.48 $8,609.58
POLICE $46,387.91 $675.47 $47,063.38. $3,600.34 $274.59 $50,938.31
PUBLIC WORKS $17,305.01 $2,571.54 $19,876.55 $1,520.56 $1,814.31 $23,211.42
LIBRARY $5,580.57 $0.00 $5,580.57 $426.94 $312.41 $6,319.92
RECREATION $7,829.29 $0.00 $7,829.29 $598.95 $750.27 $9,178.51
PARKS $10,194.81 $629.56 $10,824.37 $828.06 $856.33 $12,508.76
TOTALS $109,034.60 $3,876.57 $112,911.17 $8,637.74 $6,156.64 $127,705.55
TOTAL INVOICES $507,121.98 (05/11/04 Board Report)
TOTAL PAYROLL $127,705.55
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $634,827.53
City Council May 11, 2004
Reappointment of Department Heads:
City Administrator Anton Graff
Finance Director Traci Pleckham
City Engineer Joe Wywrot
Chief of Police Harold Martin
Building and Zoning Code Official William Dettmer
Executive Director of Parks & Recreation Laura Brown
Director of Public Works Eric Dhuse
Library Director Michaeleen Pfister
City Attorney Daniel Kramer
City Council May 11, 2004
Committee/Commission Reappointments:
Fire & Police Commission, (/
Three Years Ending 4/30/07: Margie Putzlery
Library Board,
Three Years Ending 4/30/07: Gail Gaebler ✓
Marilyn Vorderer
Joanne Gryder
Park Board,
Five Years Ending 4/30/09: Heather Fiala
Zoning Board of Appeals,
Five Years Ending 4/30/09: Ralph Pfister —
Ben Moe i/
Facade Committee,
Three Years Ending 4/30/07: Johanna Byram ✓
Police Pension Fund Board,
Two Years Ending 4/30/06: Todd Over
Vacancies:
Human Resource Commission: Three
Façade Committee: One ( )
T.
H( 1-c-r7 S6C-Oy oC
May . 5 . 2004 4 :31PM No . 4775 P . 2/4
Sciioppe Desyn. Associates
Landscape Architecture and Land Planning
430 W. Downer Place Ph. (630)896-2501
Aurora, IL 60508 Fax (630) 896-3228
AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
between
SCHOPPE DESIGN ASSOCIATES
430 W.DOWNER PLACE
AURORA, IL 60506
and
THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
800 GAME FARM ROAD
YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560
Amended May 11,2004
PART ONE—PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Name: City of Yorkville
Location: Yorkville, Illinois
Scope: Consulting Serviced for:
1.Plan Review
2.Ordinances Updates
3.Miscellaneous Consulting and Design
Client Representative: Tony Graff,City Administrator
Term of Contract: Three Years
Commencing: April 23,2002
Ending: April 23,2005
Nit 1 ora
May . 5 . 2004 4 : 31PM No .4775 P . 3/4
PART TWO—BASIC SERVICES
,Plan Review:
SDA will provide the following plan review services:
1. Prepare for and attend meetings with petitioners as requested
2. Provide recommendations for modifications to submitted plans.
3. Review annexation agreements.
4. Review development plans to ensure compliance with the Comprehensive plan,zoning,
subdivision,and landscape ordinances.
5. Prepare memorandums to the UCY documenting our recommendations.
6. Attend the following regularly scheduled meetings;
a. Plan Council
b, Plan Commission
c. City Council,as requested by Mayor
d, Park Board planning meeting
Ordinance Updates
SDA will update sections of the subdivision control and zoning ordinances as directed by the UCY. This work
will include:
1. Reviewing ordinances to incorporate new design standards and criteria.
2. Review ordinances against other City documents to eliminate inconsistent text.
3. Periodically update ordinances to conform to revised procedures and schedules.
4. Other special projects as requested by the UCY.
Prior to proceeding with any services under Ordinance Updates, SBA will submit a proposal outlining services,
approximate range of fees,and hourly rates prior to proceeding with these services.
Miscellaneous Consulting
SDA will from time to time provide miscellaneous planning and design services as requested by the UCY. These
may include the following:
1. Attendance at special staff meetings as requested,
2. Consulting on Comprehensive Plan amendments.
3. Prepare plans identifying future school sites.
4. Consulting and review of Transportation Study.
5. Prepare development plans and landscape plans requested by the City.
Fees for miscellaneous consulting will be invoiced on an hourly basis. However, an expected range of fees will be
provided if requested, for a specific scope of work.
Additional Services
SDA may provide additional services that are not included in the Basic Services, such as, but not limited to;
1. Requested services other than those described under Basic Services.
2. Attendance at meetings other than those described under Basic Services.
If circumstances arise during our performance of the Basic Services, which we believe requires additional services,
we will promptly notify you about the nature,extent and probable additional cost of the additional services and
perform only such additional services following your written authorizations.
rile 2 of 3
May . 5 . 2004 4 : 31 PM No . 4775 P. 4/4
PART THREE—CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES
UCY shall provide SDA with the following information:
1. For those items which the UCY is requesting written comments,the UCY shall provide plans
and other supporting documents to SDA,a minimum of one week prior to the date at which the
UCY is requesting such comments.
2. Copies of approved plans,annexation agreements, and other documents pertaining to
development approvals.
3. Minutes of council meetings,which pertain to development approvals.
4, Current ordinances and the latest amendments.
PART FOUR—COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT
Basic Services:
You agree to compensate us for the services described in Part Two of this Agreement as follows:
Plan Review Hourly
Ordinance Updates Hourly
Miscellaneous Consulting and Design Hourly
Additional Sexy ices
You agree to compensate us for additional services as described in this agreement at our standard rates.
Standard Rates:
Project Principal $123.00 per hour
Project Management . $110.00 per hour
Attendance at Plan Commission, Park Board $100.00 per hour
and City Council meetings
Project Design $ 90.00 per hour
Drafting .. $ 55.00 per hour
Administrative Support $ 50.00 per hour
This rate schedule will be reviewed and updated annually based on mutual consent of both UCY and SDA.
Payment:
Each month,we will provide invoices that describe the invoice period,the services rendered,fees and expenses
due. Invoices for hourly fees will describe the tasks,hours, and hourly rates for the service completed. Payments
will be due 30 days from date of invoice. We reserve the right to suspend our services if you have unpaid invoices
over 60 days old and upon notice thereof,
PART FIVE—ACCEPTANCE
UCY and SDA may terminate this Agreement upon 90 days prior written notice to the other party. Unless and
until such termination,this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Please indicate your acceptance of this Agreement by signing and returning both originals to us. A countersigned
agreement will be returned to you.
Accepted by: _ Date:
Mayor Art Prochaska,United City of Yorkville
Accepted by: Date:
Mike Schoppe, Schoppe Design Associates
Pap 3ofJ
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
COUNTY OF KENDALL )
ORDINANCE NO. 2004-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE REPEALING
ORDINANCE NO. 1999-12 AND AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING THE
PROVISIONS OF THE STATE OFFICICALS AND EMPLOYEES ETHICS ACT
(5 ILCS 430/1-1 ET. SEQ.)
WHEREAS, the Illinois General Assembly has enacted the State Officials and
Employees Ethics Act 5 ILCS 430/1-1 et.seq. (hereinafter referred to as "Act"),which is
a comprehensive revision of State statutes regulating ethical conduct, political activities
and the solicitation and acceptance of gifts by state officials and employees; and
WHEREAS, the Act requires all units of local government and school districts to
adopt ordinances or resolutions regulating the political activities of, and the solicitation
and acceptance of gifts by, the officers and employees of such units "in a manner no less
restrictive"than the provisions of the Act on or before May 19, 2004; and
WHEREAS, it is the clear intention of the Act to require units of local
government and school districts to implement regulations that are at least as restrictive as
those contained in the Act, and to impose penalties for violations of those regulations that
are equivalent to those imposed by the Act, notwithstanding that such penalties may
exceed the general authority granted to units of local government to penalize ordinance
violations; and
WHEREAS, it is the clear intention of the act to provide units of local
government with all authority necessary to implement its requirements on the local level
regardless of any general limitations on the power to define and punish ordinance
violations that might otherwise be applicable; and
WHEREAS, because the Act provides for the imposition of significant penalties
for violations of said local regulations, it is necessary to adopt the required regulations by
Ordinance rather than by Resolution;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDANINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The Code of Ordinances of The United City of Yorkville is hereby
amended by the addition of the following provisions:
1
ARTICLE 1
DEFINITIONS
Section 1-1. For purposes of this ordinance, the following terms shall be given
these definitions:
"Campaign for elective office"means any activity in furtherance of an
effort to influence the selection, nomination, election, or appointment of any individual to
any federal, State, or local public office or office in a political organization, or the
selection, nomination, or election of Presidential or Vice-Presidential electors,but does
not include activities (i) relating to the support or opposition of any executive, legislative,
or administrative action, (ii) relating to collective bargaining, or(iii) that are otherwise in
furtherance of the person's official duties.
"Candidate"means a person who has filed nominating papers or petitions
for nomination or election to an elected office, or who has been appointed to fill a
vacancy in nomination, and who remains eligible for placement on the ballot at a regular
election, as defined in section 1-3 of the election Code (10 ILCS 5/1-3).
"Compensated time"means, with respect to an employee, any time
worked by or credited to the employee that counts toward any minimum work time
requirement imposed as a condition of his or her employment, but for purposes of this
Ordinance, does not include any designated holidays, vacation periods, personal time,
compensatory time off or any period when the employee is on a leave of absence. With
respect to officers of employees whose hours are not fixed, "compensated time" includes
any period of time when the officer is on premises under the control of the employer and
any other time when the officer or employee is executing his or her official duties,
regardless of location.
"Compensatory time off'means authorized time off earned by or awarded
to an employee to compensate in whole or in part for time worked in excess of the
minimum work time required of that employee as a condition of his or her employment.
The definition of"Compensatory time off" or"Compensated time" given herein shall in
no way affect the same definitions under any collective bargaining agreement or
employee manual definition for employee benefit purposes of the City Code of the
United City of Yorkville. The defined terms "Compensatory time off' and
"Compensated time"under Article 1 of this Ordinance, are solely limited to definitions
for purposes of interpreting Article 2 "Prohibited Political Activities" subsection (b) of
this Ordinance.
"Contribution" has the same meaning as that term is defined in section
901.4 of the Election code (10 ILCS 5/9-1.4).
2
"Employee"means a person employed by The United City of Yorkville,
whether on a fulltime or part-time bases or pursuant to a contract,whose duties are
subject to the direction and control of an employer with regard to the material details of
how the work is to be perfoinued, but does not include an independent contractor.
"Employer"means The United City of Yorkville.
"Gift"means any gratuity, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan,
forbearance, or other tangible or intangible item having monetary value including, but not
limited to, cash, food and drink, and honoraria for speaking engagements related to or
attributable to government employment or the official position of an officer or employee.
"Leave of absence"means any period during which an employee does not
receive (i) compensation for employment, (ii) service credit towards pension benefits,
and(iii)health insurance benefits paid for by the employer.
"Officer" means a person who holds, by election or appointment, an office
created by statute or ordinance, regardless of whether the officer is compensated for
service in his or her official capacity.
"Political activity"means any activity in support of or in connection with
any campaign for elective office or any political organization,but does not include
activities (i) relating to the support or opposition of any executive, legislative, or
administrative action, (ii) relating to collective bargaining, or (iii) that are otherwise in
furtherance of the person's official duties.
"Political organization" means a party, committee, association, fund, or
other organization (whether or not incorporated) that is required to file a statement of
organization with the state Board of Elections or a county clerk under section 9-3 of the
Election Code (10 ILCS 5/9-3), but only with regard to those activities that require filing
with the state Board of Elections or a county clerk.
"Prohibited political activity" means:
(1) Preparing for, organizing, or participating in any political
meeting, political rally,political demonstration, or other
political event.
(2) Soliciting contributions, including but not limited to the
purchase of, selling, distributing, or receiving payment for
tickets for any political fundraiser, political meeting, or
other political event.
(3) Soliciting, planning the solicitation of, or preparing any
document or report regarding anything of value intended as
campaign contribution.
3
(4) Planning, conducting, or participating in a public opinion
poll in connection with a campaign for elective office or on
behalf of a political organization for political purposes or
for or against any referendum question.
(5) Surveying or gathering information from potential or actual
voters in an election to determine probable vote outcome in
connection with a campaign for elective office or on behalf
of a political organization for political purposes or for or
against any referendum question.
(6) Assisting at the polls on Election Day on behalf of any
political organization or candidate for elective office or for
or against any referendum question.
(7) Soliciting votes on behalf of a candidate for elective office
or a political organization or for or against any referendum
question or helping in an effort to get voters to the polls.
(8) Initiating for circulation, preparing, circulating, reviewing,
or filing any petition on behalf of a candidate for elective
office or for or against any referendum questions.
(9) Making contributions on behalf of any candidate for
elective office in that capacity or in connection with a
campaign or elective office.
(10) Preparing or reviewing responses to candidate
questionnaires.
(11) Distributing,preparing for distribution, or mailing
campaign literature, campaign signs, or other campaign
material on behalf of any candidate for elective office or for
or against any referendum questions.
(12) Campaigning for any elective office or for or against any
referendum questions.
(13) Managing or working on a campaign for elective office or
for or against any referendum question.
(14) Serving as a delegate, alternate, or proxy to a political party
convention.
(15) Participating in any recount or challenge to the outcome of
any election.
4
"Prohibited source"means any person or entity who:
(1) is seeking official action (i)by an officer or(ii) by an
employee, or by the officer or another employee directing
that employee;
(2) does business or seeks to do business (i) with the officer or
(ii) with an employee, or with the officer or another
employee directing that employee;
(3) conducts activities regulated(i)by the officer or (ii) by an
employee, or by the officer or another employee directing
that employee; or
(4) has interests that may be substantially affected by the
performance or non-performance of the official duties of
the officer or employee.
ARTICLE 2
PROHIBITED POLITICAL ACTIVITIES
Section 2-1. Prohibited political activities. (a) No officer or employee shall
intentionally perform any prohibited political activity during any compensated time, as
defined herein. No officer or employee shall intentionally use any property or resources
of the United City of Yorkville in connection with any prohibited political activity.
(b) At no time shall any officer or employee intentionally require any other
officer or employee to perform any prohibited political activity(i) as part of that officer
or employee's duties, (ii) as a condition of employment, or(iii) during any compensated
time off(such as holidays, vacation or personal time off).
(c) No officer or employee shall be required at any time to participate in any
prohibited political activity in consideration for that officer or employee being awarded
additional compensation or any benefit, whether in the form of a salary adjustment,
bonus, compensatory time off, continued employment or otherwise, nor shall any officer
or employee be awarded additional compensation or any benefit in consideration for his
or her participation in any prohibited political activity.
(d) Nothing in this section prohibits activities that are permissible for an officer
or employee to engage in as part of his or here official duties, or activities that are
undertaken by an officer or employee on a voluntary basis which are not prohibited by
this Ordinance.
5
(e) No person either(i) in a position that is subject to recognized merit principles
of public employment or(ii) in a position the salary for which is paid in whole or in part
by federal funds and that is subject to the Federal Standards for a Merit System of
Personnel Administration applicable to grant-in-aid programs, shall be denied or deprived
of employment or tenure solely because he or she is a member or an officer of a political
committee, of a political party, or of a political organization or club.
ARTICLE 3
GIFT BAN
Section 3-1. Gift ban. Except as permitted by this Article, no officer or
employee, and no spouse of or immediate family member living with any officer or
employee (collectively referred to herein as "recipients"), shall intentionally solicit or
accept any gift from any prohibited source, as defined herein, or which is otherwise
prohibited by law or ordinance. No prohibited source shall intentionally offer or make a
gift that violates this section.
Section 3-2. Exceptions. Section 3-1 is not applicable to the following:
(1) Opportunities,benefits, and services that are available on the same
conditions as for the general public.
(2) Anything for which the officer or employee, or his or her spouse or
immediate family member, pays the fair market value.
(3) Any(i) contribution that is lawfully made under the Election Code or(ii)
activities associated with a fundraising event in support of a political
organization or candidate.
(4) Educational materials and missions.
(5) Travel expenses for a meeting to discuss business.
(6) A gift from a relative, meaning those people related to the individual as
father, mother, son, daughter,brother, sister, uncle, aunt, great aunt, great
uncle, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, grandfather,
grandmother, grandson, granddaughter, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-
in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather,
stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother,
half sister, and including the father, mother, grandfather, or grandmother
of the individual's fiancé or fiancée.
6
(7) Anything provided by an individual on the basis of a personal friendship
unless the recipient has reason to believe that, under the circumstances, the
gift was provided because of the official position or employment of the
recipient or his or her spouse or immediate family member and not
because of the personal friendship.
In determining whether a gift is provided on the basis of personal
friendship, the recipient shall consider the circumstances under which the
gift was offered, such as:
(i) the history of the relationship between the individual giving the if
and the recipient of the gift, including any previous exchange of
gifts between those individuals;
(ii) whether to the actual knowledge of the recipient the individual
who gave the gift personally paid for the gift or sought a tax
deduction or business reimbursement for the gift; and
(iii) whether to the actual knowledge of the recipient the individual
who gave the gift also at the same time gave the same or similar
gifts to other officers or employees, or their spouses or immediate
family members.
(8) Food or refreshments not exceeding $75 per person in value on a single
calendar day; provided that the food or refreshments are (i) consumed on
the premises from which they were purchased or prepared or(ii) catered.
For the purposes of this Section, "catered" means food or refreshments
that are purchased ready to consume which are delivered by any means.
(9) Food, refreshments, lodging, transportation, and other benefits resulting
from outside business or employment activities (or outside activities that
are not connected to the official duties of an officer or employee), if the
benefits have not been offered or enhanced because of the official position
or employment of the officer or employee, and are customarily provided to
others in similar circumstances.
(10) Intra-governmental and inter-governmental gifts. For the purpose of this
Act, "intra-governmental gift"means any gift given to an officer or
employee from another officer or employee, and "inter-governmental gift"
means any gift given to an officer or employee by an officer or employee
of another governmental entity.
(11) Bequests, inheritances, and other transfers at death.
(12) Any item or items from any one prohibited source during any calendar
year having a cumulative total value of less than $100.
7
Each of the exceptions listed in this Section is mutually exclusive and
independent of every other.
Section 3-3. Disposition of gifts. An officer or employee,his or her spouse or
any immediate family member living with the officer or employee, does not violate this
Ordinance if the recipient promptly takes reasonable action to return a gift from a
prohibited source to its source or gives the gift or an amount equal to its value to an
appropriate charity that is exempt from income taxation under Section 501 (c) (3) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as now or hereafter amended, renumbered, or succeeded.
Section 4. REPEALER: All ordinances or parts of ordinances conflicting with
any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 5. SEVERABILITY: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase
or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court
of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and
independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions hereof.
Section 6. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be in effect upon its
passage and approval by the United City of Yorkville Mayor and City Council.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Ordinance has been enacted this day of
, 2004.
PAUL JAMES MARTY MUNNS
RICHARD STICKA WANDA OHARE
VALERIE BURD ROSE SPEARS
LARRY KOT JOSEPH BESCO
APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County,
Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2004.
MAYOR
8
PASSED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County,
Illinois this day of , A.D. 2004.
Attest:
CITY CLERK
This Document Prepared by:
Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer
1107A South Bridge Street
Yorkville, Illinois 60560
630-553-9500
9
J•`,ctiO C/?` United City of Yorkville Memorandum
t � 800 Game Farm Road
EST. ,1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560
-6-$14111------- Telephone: 630-553-4350
—*' Fax: 630-553-7575
<C6 �v
Date: May 11, 2004
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Traci Pleckham - Finance Director.
CC: City Administrator & Department Heads
Subject: 2003 Certified Tax Levy Rate
Based on the attached Certified Tax Levy Rate and Extension for the City, the
following are examples of a homeowner's estimated tax amount on a $210,000
home (Keep in mind that although the City's certified levy rate is higher than the
approved rate, the estimated tax amount is less. This is due to a state multiplier of
less than 1 and a lower EAV amount):
2002 Tax Rate of .8674
Home Value = $210,000
$210,000/3 = $ 70,000
$70,000 - $3,500 = $ 66,500 Homeowner Exemption
$665 x .8674 = $ 576.82
Tax Levy Rate Approved 12/23/03
2003 Tax Rate of .7774
$210,000 x 1.10% = $231,000 Estimated EAV increase
$231,000/3 = $ 77,000
$77,000 - $3,500 = $ 73,500 Homeowner Exemption
$735 x .7774 = $ 571.39
Tax amount decrease is $5.43 (estimated)
Certified Rate Dated 05/04/04
2003 Tax Rate of .7895
$210,000 x 1.10% = $231,000 Estimated EAV increase
$231,000/3 = $ 77,000
$77,000 x .9838 *State Multiplier$ 75,753
$75,753 - $3,500 = $ 72,253 Homeowner Exemption
$723 x .7895 = $ 570.81
Tax amount decrease is $6.01 (estimated)
KENDALL COUNTY PROPERTY TAX LIMITATION WORKSHEET DATE 5/ 4/ 4 PAGE 117
TAXING DISTRICT - CITY OF YORKVILLE
TAXING CODE - VCYV THE PRIOR YEAR 2002 WAS USED TO CALCULATE THE NUMERATOR 2003 EAV FOR KENDALL COUNTY 201,321,335
( PRIOR EAV - DISCONNECTED ) = ADJUSTED PRIOR EAV
164,758,054 0 164,758,054
( ( ADJ. PRIOR EXTENSION x ( ADJ. PRIOR EAV / PRIOR EAV ) ) x LIMIT ) NUMERATOR
1,429,114.40 164,758,054 164,758,054 1.0240 1,463,413
( ( CURRENT EAV - ANNEXED IN ) - ( NEW PROPERTY x STATE MULT ) ) - DENOMINATOR
201,321,335 2,264,912 20,674,857 .9838 178,716,499
( NUMERATOR / DENOMINATOR ) = LIMITING RATE
1,463,413 178,716,499 .8188
CALCULATED RATE LIMITING RATE
.7895 .8188 * DISTRICT IS WITHIN THE LIMIT *
CALCULATED CALCULATED LIMITED LIMITED CERTIFIED CERTIFIED
FUND/NAME LEVY REQUEST RATE EXTENSION RATE EXTENSION RATE EXTENSION
*001 CORPORATE 203,718 .1012 203,740.33 .1012 203,740.33 .1012 203,740.47
*005 I.M.R.F 123,135 .0612 123,208.66 .0612 123,208.66 .0612 123,208.66
*014 POLICE PROTECTION 154,176 .0750 150,991.00 .0750 150,991.00 .0750 150,991.00
*015 POLICE PENSION 206,802 .1028 206,958.33 .1028 206,958.33 .1028 206,958.33
*025 GARBAGE 247,093 .1228 247,222.60 .1228 247,222.60 .1228 247,222.60
*027 AUDIT 19,529 .0098 19,729.49 .0098 19,729.49 .0098 19,729.49
*035 LIABILITY INSURANCE 113,063 .0562 113,142.59 .0562 113,142.59 .0562 113,142.59
*047 SOC SEC/IMRF 201,252 .1000 201,321.34 .1000 201,321.34 .1000 201,321.34
*048 SCHOOL CROSS GUARD 9,456 .0047 9,462.10 .0047 9,462.10 .0047 9,462.10
*060 UNEMPLOYMENT INS 11,512 .0058 11,676.64 .0058 11,676.64 .0058 11,676.64
*016 LIBRARY 308,353 .1500 301,914.73 .1500 301,914.73 .1500 301,914.65
*205 IMRF-LIBRARY 0 .0000 .00 .0000 .00 .0000 .00
*347 SOC SECURITY-LIBRARY 0 .0000 .00 .0000 .00 .0000 .00
TOTAL (CAPPED) 1,598,089 .7895 1,589,367.81 .7895 1,589,367.81 .7895 1,589,367.87
TOTAL (NOT CAPPED) 0 .0000 .00 .0000 .00 .0000 .00
TOTAL (ALL) 1,598,089 .7895 1,589,367.81 .7895 1,589,367.81 .7895 1,589,367.87
*Property Cap Fund
Copr 2003 CIDNET Software
KENDALL COUNTY TAX RATE COMPUTATION DATE 5/ 4/2004 PAGE 103
TAXING DISTRICT - CITY OF YORKVILLE
TAXING CODE - VCYV
EQUALIZATION FACTOR - .9838
BOARD OF REVIEW HIE/VET EQUALIZED OWNER STF HOMESTEAD ADJUSTED TAXABLE OVERLAPPING
ASSESSMENT EXEMPTION VALUATION OCCUPIED FREEZE EXEMPTION VALUATION VALUE (TIF) VALUATION
FARM 1,137,928 0 1,132,133 3,500 0 0 1,128,633 1,128,633
RESIDENTIAL 159,809,170 278,791 156,946,374 7,862,673 878,204 537,167 147,668,330 147,660,675
COMMERCIAL 47,823,708 7,947 47,041,134 14,000 0 0 47,027,134 46,944,380
INDUSTRIAL 6,066,142 0 5,967,862 0 0 0 5,967,862 5,569,563
MINERAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RAILROADS-LOCAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RAILROADS-STATE 0 0 18,084 0 0 0 18,084 18,084
TOTAL 214,836,948 286,738 211,105,587 7,880,173 878,204 537,167 201,810,043 201,321,335
MAXIMUM NON LEVIED CALCULATED ACTUAL TOTAL KENDALL
FUND/NAME LEVY REQUEST RATE RATE RATE RATE EXTENSION EXTENSION PER CENT
001 CORPORATE 203,718 .3300 .101190 .1012 203,740 203,740.47 12.82
005 I.M.R.F 123,135 NONE .061160 .0612 123,208 123,208.66 7.75
014 POLICE PROTECTION 154,176 .0750 .076580 .0750 150,991 150,991.00 9.50
015 POLICE PENSION 206,802 NONE .102720 .1028 206,958 206,958.33 13.02
025 GARBAGE 247,093 .2000 .122730 .1228 247,222 247,222.60 15.55
027 AUDIT 19,529 NONE .009700 .0098 19,729 19,729.49 1.24
035 LIABILITY INSURANCE 113,063 NONE .056160 .0562 113,142 113,142.59 7.12
047 SOC SEC/IMRF 201,252 NONE .099960 .1000 201,321 201,321.34 12.67
048 SCHOOL CROSS GUARD 9,456 .0200 .004690 .0047 9,462 9,462.10 .60
060 UNEMPLOYMENT INS 11,512 NONE .005710 .0058 11,676 11,676.64 .73
016 LIBRARY 308,353 .1500 .153190 .1500 301,914 301,914.65 19.00
205 IMRF-LIBRARY 0 NONE .000000 .0000 .00 .00
347 SOC SECURITY-LIBRARY 0 NONE .000000 .0000 .00 .00
TOTAL 1,598,089 .7895 1,589,367 1,589,367.87 100.00
Copr 2003 CIDNET Software Calculations Exclude Parcels Less Than 150
\;,
ivIllinois Department of Transportation
Division of Highways/ District 3
700 East Norris Drive/ Ottawa, Illinois/ 61350-0697
Telephone 815/434-6131
April 30, 2004
Ms. Jacquelyn Milschewski
City Clerk
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
Dear Ms. Milschewski:
Enclosed is a copy of Audit Report No. 55 covering the receipt and
disbursement of Motor Fuel Tax funds by your city for the period beginning
January 1, 2003 and ending December 31, 2003.
PLEASE REFER TO BLR 7402 OF THE AUDIT FOR THE AUDITOR'S
COMMENTS.
This report should be presented to the Mayor and the City Council at the first
regular meeting after the receipt of this letter and then filed as a permanent
record in your office.
Sincerely,
Diane O'Keefe
District Engineer
A
'James R. Threadgill III
District Local Roads & Streets Engineer
cc: Debra Baxter, MFT Auditor
II
A d • t
Agency
Ctt
A dit for: Audit Year
1-4-Motor Fuel Tax 2-601
Township Bridge Audit Number
Special Assessment
G.O. Bond Issue
MFT Fund Bond Issue Date
Illinois Department
of Transportation
Bureau of Local Roads and Streets
BLR 9009 (Rev. 10/91)
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE
TRANSPORTATION
AUDIT REPORT NO. 55
CITY OF YORKVILLE
We hereby certify that we have audited the books and records in so far as they pertain to the receipt
and disbursement of the Motor Fuel Tax Fund of the City of YORKVILLE for the period beginning Jan. 1, 2003
and ending Dec. 31, 2003 , and that entries for receipts in these books and records are true and correct and are in
agreement with the records maintained by the Department of Transportation and that entries for disbursements are
supported by canceled warrants or checks with exceptions noted in the audit findings.
We further certify that we have verified entries in the claim registers with the original claims and
canceled warrants, that we have examined and checked the records fo the City Clerk and City Treasurer,
have compared the expenditures listed in the warrant registers of those offices against the minutes of the City
Council maintained by the City Clerk and have found them to be in accordance therewith exceptions
noted in the audit findings.
Auditor
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY
Date: 3-- 6--09
t Local '•.ds and Streets Engineer
BLR 7401
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF AUDITOR'S COMMENTS
TRANSPORTATION
Audit Report No.55
CITY OF YORKVILLE
Audit Period:Jan. 1, 2003 to Dec. 31, 2003
Purpose of Audit: To determine the status of Motor Fuel Tax Funds as of Dec.31,2003
The other receipts to the Motor Fuel Tax Fund were $19,723.01 received as follows:
Interest 2003 $2,342.13
High Growth FY03 $7,982.00
High Growth FY04 $7,887.00
Reimbursement $245.71
Reimbursement $1,266.17
Total received: $19,723.01
The 2002 Maintenance Expenditure Statement was on file at time of audit.
Adequate records are available to support Fund activity.
This Audit was done on a selective sampling basis.
BLR 7402(Rev. 1-90) SIGNED 412 . v
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF
Fund Balance and Bank Reconciliation
TRANSPORTATION
AUDIT REPORT NO. 55
City of YORKVILLE
Date: March 11, 2004
Audit Period Jan., 1, 2003 - Dec. 31, 2003
Fund Balance Unobliqated Obligated Total Outstanding Warrants
Balance Previous Audit 220,558.56 26,214.99 246,773.55
Allotments & Cert. 176,272.97 0.00 176,272.97
Total MFT Funds 396,831.53 26,214.99 _ 423,046.52
Approved Authorizations (173,288.29) 173,288.29 0.00
Other Receipts 19,723.01 19,723.01
Total 223,543.24 219,226.29 442,769.53
Disbursements 242,497.80 242,497.80
Surplus (Credits) 31,538.26 (31,538.26) 0.00
Unexpended Balance 255,081.50 (54,809.77) 200,271.73
Bank Reconciliation
Balance in Fund per Bank Certificate Dec. 31, 2003 200,634.88
Deduct Outstanding Warrants 363.15
Add Outstanding investments
Additions
Subtraction's
Net Balance in Account Dec. 31, 2003 200,271.73
BLR 7403 (Rev. 1/90)
IL 494-0654 Certified Correct 40 .
A itor
i
SUMMARY OF MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND TRANSACTIONS
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY SECTIONS AND CATEGORIES
CITY OF YORKVILLE Audit Period: January 1,2003-December 1,2003 Audit Report No.55
Surplus to Prey. Total
Balance Total Amount Other Total Funds Total Unobligated Unexpended
SECTION Accumulated Accumulated
Prey.Audit Authorized Adjustments Receipts Available Disbursements Balance Balance
(Credits_ Disbursements Disbursements
MAINTENANCE 0 00 0.00 0.00
01-00000-00-GM 11,402 23 11,402.23 11,402.23 0.00 27,557.77 27557.77
0.00 0.00 0:00
02-00000-00-GM 36,665.95 951.43 37,617.38 26,360.68 11,256 70 10,437.05 36,797.73
0.00 0.00 0.00
03-00000-00-GM 78,675.80 314.74 78,990 54 25,168.04 53,822.50 25,168 04
0 00 0.00 0.00
CONSTRUCTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
01-00024-00-TL 12,750.54 12,750.54 12,750.54 0.00 12,750.54
ENG 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
02-00028-00-TL (33,755.45) (33,755.45) 95,547.88 i (129,303.33)1_ 33,755.45 129,303.33
ENG 27125 6,069.45 6,340.70 6,340.70 0.00 35,750.01 42,090.71
0.00 0.00 0.00
OBLIGATION RET 0.00 0.00 0.00-
0.00 0.00 0.00
00-00023-00-GB 7,609.69 75,792,50 83,402.19 76,329.96 7,072.23 10,731.64 87,061.60
0.00 0.00 0.00
ERRONEOUS (245.71) 245.71 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 I 0.00 0.00
0 00 0.00F 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
INTEREST 0.00 0.00 0.00
0 00 0 00 0 00
02-00000-00-AC 4,267.03 4,267.03 4,267.03 0.00 0.00
03-00000-00-AC 2,342.13 2,342.13 2,342.13 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
03-00000-03-AC OTHER 7,982.00 7,982 00 7,982.00 0.00 0.00
04-00000-03-AC OTHER 7,887.00 7,887.00 7,887.00 0.00 0.00
XXXXX 26,214.99 173,288.29 0.00 19,723.01 219,226.29 242,497.80 31,538.26 (54,809.77) 118,231.92 360,729.72
BLR 7406(Rev.1-90)
'IIIv STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT
1-41.1-117 LAST STATEMENT: NOVEMBER 30, 2003
TOIA STATEMENT: DECEMBERRI, 2033
CASTLE BANK I
TOTAL DAYS N STATEMENTTPERIOD: 31
PAGE NUMBER I ACCOUNT NUMBER
PAGE 1 OF 1 I 0080513239.
DIRECT INQUIRIES TO:
1-800-990-5713
11111.'1111111'ill'11II111'� 11111'1 111111111 1111 CASTLE BANK N.A.
CITY OF YORKVILLE 141 W LINCOLN HWY
800 GAME FARM RD DEKALB, IL 60115
YORKVILLE IL 60560
4
S U M M A R Y OF ACCOUNT B A LANCE _._ - .,.
ACCOUNT NUMBER ENDING BALANCE
PUBLIC FUNDS NOW ACCOUNT 0080513239 $200,634.88
` PUBLIC FUNDS NOW ACCOUNT ! " ,
ACCOUNT NUMBER BEGINNING BALANCE $190,749. 77
0080513239 LOW BALANCE $190,749.77
AVG COLLECTED BALANCE $197,501.00
4 ENCLOSURES INTEREST PAID YEAR TO DATE $2,342. 13
TOTAL ADDITIONS $15, 159.41
TOTAL SUBTRACTIONS $-5,274.30
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
5115 12-11 4,832. 75/ 5117 12-30 195. 75
5116 12-16 245.80 /
DATE DESCRIPTION ADDITIONS SUBTRACTIONS
12-10 DEPOSIT 15,005.00
12-31 #INTEREST CREDIT 154.41
DAILY BALANCES
DATE AMOUNT DATE AMOUNT DATE AMOUNT
11-30 190, 749. 77 12-11 200,922.02 12-30 200,480.47
12-10 205,754.77 12-16 200,676.22 12-31 200,634.88
e FDInuoat ea 008051]2]9 �S I
. ncn
r
DISTRICT 03 COUNTY 093
AGENCY TYPE 3 AGENCY NAME YORKVILLE
TRANS. TRANS. TRANS. SECTION UNOBLIGATED
DATE TYPE NUMBER NUMBER CATEGORY ALLOTMENT AUTHORIZATION CREDIT PAY TO STATE BALANCE
$ 220,558.56
12-31-02 ALLOTMENT $ 14,871.63
$ 235,430. 19
01-31-03 ALLOTMENT $ 14,610.83
$ 250,041 .02
02-07-03 AUTH 030207706 020002800TL ENGINERNG $ 1 , 127.50 $ 248,913.52
02-12-03 CREDIT 030212184 030000003AC OTHER CAT $ 7,982.00 $ 256,895.52
02-28-03 ALLOTMENT $ 14, 199.60
$ 271 ,095. 12
03-03-03 AUTH 030303025 020002800TL ENGINERNG $ 1 ,327.50 $ 269,767.62
03-06-03 AUTH 030306197 010002400TL CONT CONS $ 12,750.54 $ 257,017.08
03-14-03 CREDIT 030314576 010000000GM MAINT $ 11 ,402.23 $ 268,419.31
03-14-03 CREDIT 030314577 020000000AC INTEREST $ 4,267.03 $ 272,686.34
03-28-03 AUTH 030328190 020002800TL ENGINERNG $ 90.00 $ 272,596.34
03-31-03 ALLOTMENT $ 12,517.06
$ 285, 113.40
04-04-03 AUTH 030404409 000002300GB OBL RETMT $ 75,792.50 $ 209,320.90
04-30-03 ALLOTMENT $ 14,297.95
$ 223,618.85
05-08-03 AUTH 030508405 020002800TL ENGINERNG $ 225.00 $ 223,393.85
05-19-03 AUTH 030519846 030000000GM MAINT $ 55,805.00 $ 167,588.85
05-31-03 ALLOTMENT $ 15,612.34
$ 183,201 . 19
06-05-03 AUTH 030605440 020002800TL ENGINERNG $ 202.50 $ 182,998.69
06-30-03 ALLOTMENT $ 13,490.72
$ 196,489.41
07-18-03 AUTH 030718646 030000000GM MAINT $ 22,870.80 $ 173,618.61
07-31-03 ALLOTMENT $ 15,274.56
$ 188,893. 17
08-04-03 AUTH 030804152 020002800TL ENGINERNG $ 427.50 $ 188,465.67
08-31-03 ALLOTMENT $ 15,946.25
$ 204,411 .92
09-03-03 AUTH 030903086 020002800TL ENGINERNG $ 1 ,856.30 $ 202,555.62
09-10-03 AUTH 030910262 020002800TL ENGINERNG $ 450.00 $ 202, 105.62
09-30-03 ALLOTMENT $ 15, 185.47
$ 217,291 .09
10-15-03 CREDIT 031015330 040000003AC OTHER CAT $ 7,887.00 $ 225, 178.09
10-31-03 ALLOTMENT $ 15,261 .56
$ 240,439.65
11-21-03 AUTH 031121252 020002800TL ENGINERNG $ 112.50 $ 240,327. 15
11-21-03 AUTH 031121253 020002800TL ENGINERNG $ 250.65 $ 240,076.50
11-30-03 ALLOTMENT $ 15,005.00
$ 255,081.50
TOTALS $ 176,272.97 $ 173,288.29 $ 31 ,538.26 $ .00 $ 255,081 .50