City Council Packet 2004 09-28-04 •j United City of Yorkville
EST atii wires.°�' rtsss County Seat of Kendall County
800 Game Farm Road
O 11 q Yorkville, Illinois, 60560
'9 0 Telephone: 630-553-4350
4 , ,�,♦. Fax: 630-553-7575
Website: www.yorkville.il.us
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 PM
Tuesday, September 28, 2004
Call to Order: 7:00 p.m.
Pledge of Allegiance:
Roll Call by Clerk: WARD I WARD II WARD III WARD IV
Rich Sticka Valerie Burd Marty Munns Joe Besco
Paul James Larry Kot Wanda Ohare Rose Ann Spears
Establishment of Quorum:
Introduction of Guests:
Amendments to Agenda:
Committee Meeting Dates:
Public Works Committee Meeting: Ad-hoc: Technology Committee
7:00 p.m., Monday, October 25, 2004 To be announced
Economic Development Committee:
7:00 p.m., Thursday, October 21, 2004
City Hall Conference Room
Administration Committee Meeting:
6:30 p.m., Thursday, October 7, 2004
City Hall Conference Room
Public Safety Committee Meeting:
6:30 p.m., Thursday, October 14, 2004
City Hall Conference Room
Public Hearings: None
Citizen Comments:
Presentations: 1. Summer Sleuths
1
City Council Meeting Agenda
September 28, 2004
Page 2
Consent Agenda
1. Building Permit Report for August 2004
2. Beecher Parking Lot RFP Results - award contract to Aurora Blacktop in an amount not to exceed
$41,119.50 and authorize the Mayor and staff to execute the construction bid documents
3. Payroll Direct Deposit- authorize Mayor to execute Automated Clearing House Agreement with Old Second
Bank- Yorkville
4. NIU Graduate Internship Program Contract-authorize City Administrator to execute
Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals:
Minutes for Approval(Corrections and Additions):
Minutes of City Council— None
Minutes of Committee of the Whole—August 3, 2004 and September 7, 2004
BM payments for approval from the current Bill List(Corrections and Additions):
Checks total these amounts:
$ 374,926.00 (vendors)
$ 141,619.60(payroll period ending 9/4/04)
$ 516,545.60(total)
Reports:
Mayor's Report:
1. IMLRMA Safety Award for 2003
2. Yas/Fischel Scope of Service and Contract for Facility Master Plan
3. Resolution Establishing Time and Place for Countryside Center TIF Public Hearing
a. Appointment of City Representative for Joint Review Board
4. Development Attorney Recommendation by Mayor/ Staff
5. Coffee with the Mayor: October 2, 2004 at Sunflower Estates, 1896 Walsh Dr. from 9:00 - 11:00 am
Attorney's Report:
City Clerk's Report:
City Council Meeting Agenda
September 28,2004
Page 3
Reports(con't):
City Treasurer's Report:
City Administrator's Report:
Finance Director's Report:
Director of Public Works Report:
Chief of Police Report:
Executive Director of Parks&Recreation Report:
Community&Liaison Report:
Committee Reports:
Public Works Committee Report:
1. Subdivision Control Ordinance
Economic Development Committee Report:
1. Fire Department Request for Development Fee Increase
a. Resolution Approving Fire Department Development Fee Increase
2. Fourth Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement for Fox Hill Subdivision
a. Ordinance Authorizing the Execution
3. Raintree Village
a. Resolution Approving Final Plat for Unit 4
b. Resolution Approving Final Plat for Unit 5
c. Resolution Approving Final Plat for Unit 6
Public Safety Committee Report:
1. No Report.
Administration Committee Report:
1. No Report.
Additional Business:
Executive Session:
1. For the purchase or lease of real property for the use of the public body.
Adjournment:
City Council Meeting Agenda
September 28, 2004
Page 4
COMMITTEES, MEMBERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES F/Y 2004—2005
'USLIC WORKS
Committee Departments Liaisons
Chairman: Alderman Besco Water and Sewer Park Board
Committee: Alderman Munns Streets and Alleys YBSD
Committee: Alderman Sticka Sanitation and Waste
Committee: Alderwoman Burd
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT!
Committee Departments Liaisons
Chairman: Alderman Sticka Planning&Building&Zoning Chamber of Commerce
Committee: Alderwoman Burd Business&Economic Dev. Kendall County Econ. Dev.
Committee: Alderwoman Spears Plan Commission
Committee: Alderman Munns Bristol Plan Commission
Yorkville Econ. Dev. Corp.
Aurora Area Convention&
Tourism Council
Downtown Re-development
1UBLIC SAFETY
Committee Departments Liaisons
Chairman: Alderman Kot Police Human Resource Comm.
Committee: Alderwoman Ohare Schools School District
Committee: Alderwoman Spears Public Relations KenCom
Committee: Alderman James
ADMINISTRATION!
Committee Departments Liaisons
Chairman: Alderman James Finance Metra
Committee: Alderwoman Ohare Public Properties Library
Committee: Alderman Kot Personnel Cable Consortium
Committee: Alderman Besco
'AD-HOC: TECHNOLOGY
Committee
Chairman: Alderman Munns
Committee: Alderman Kot
Committee: Alderman Sticka
Committee: Alderwoman Ohare
Page 1 of 11 DRAFT
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Conference Room
August 3,2004- 7:00 p.m.
In Attendance:
City
Art Prochaska—Mayor Richard Sticka-Alderman
Valerie Burd- Alderwoman Rose Spears -Alderwoman
Paul James-Alderman Larry Kot -Alderman
Wanda Ohare-Alderwoman Joe Besco- Alderman
Tony Graff—City Administrator Traci Pleckham—Finance Director
Marty Munns—Alderman Eric Dhuse—Director of Public Works
Harold Martin—Chief of Police Dan Kramer—City Attorney
Bill Powell—City Treasurer
Guests
Lynn Whitman—Burnside Construction
Jeff Hyman—Burnside Construction
Jeff Freeman—EEI
John Whitehouse—EEI
Kathy Farren—Kendall County Record
Linda Schweitzer—The Beacon News
The meeting was called to order at 7pm by Mayor Art Prochaska.
PRESENTATION:
Jeff Freeman and John Whitehouse of Engineering Enterprises, Inc. presented a
proposal for a feasibility study for a Beecher Road extension. Mr. Freeman stated
there is a need for a new or expanded north/south transportation corridor in the City
and region due to the Route 47 congestion. He also stated there is a need to identify
the potential available land before the area is lost to development. Other issues are
the existing and potential new traffic on the south side of Yorkville. He stated a
western collector between Rte. 47 and Eldamain had already been identified on the
transportation plan.
Mr. Freeman then produced an exhibit that showed the suggested feasibility study
area for the Beecher Road extension. That extension would run from Corneils to
Rte. 34,then to Rt. 71. The total extension from Rt. 34 to Rt. 71 would be 3 miles.
He said 16 general work items would be included in the study. Among those are:
• data collection
• traffic projection
Page 2 of 11
• alignment analysis
• right of way projection
• cost estimate
EEI proposed to provide this service to the City at no cost at this time. In exchange,
they want to be considered as the primary firm to complete the phase I work. Phase
II would be the final design and Phase III would be the final implementation.
Other pertinent issues are a regional connection of Beecher to the north. EEI is
currently planning a western collector called Municipal Drive, which is near the
Sugar Grove village hall.
As part of the EEI study,they would incorporate an additional Fox River bridge and
a rail crossing. They would examine spans and alignment and would consider an
underpass.
Another consideration is the River's Edge subdivision. On the eastern part of the
subdivision a 50-foot right of way was identified. There is also a tree line at that
point.
Finally, funding and financing were considered in the EEI study. State and federal
assistance are possibilities.
Mr. Freeman then concluded his presentation and opened the floor to questions.
Mayor Prochaska said he does not think the City can afford this study at the present
time, however, as the properties become available or wish to annex, a right of way
should be dedicated. Mayor Prochaska and Mr. Freeman addressed the"free for
now" aspect of the proposal. Mr. Freeman said that if their firm was not considered
for the Phase I portion, that EEI would then charge the City$36,000 for the study
they will have completed. If EEI did secure the phase I portion,then$36,000
would be deducted from the charges.
Alderwoman Spears asked if Sugar Grove is doing a similar study. Mr. Freeman
replied that currently two contracts are under consideration. One is for the Galena
Road area and the other is for the southwest portion of Sugar Grove.
Alderman Kot asked about the status of Eldamain. The Mayor said he had received
a letter from the County requesting money for improvements near Rte. 34.
Administrator Graff stated that Phase I had been submitted to the federal
government for funding, however it could be 6-7 years before construction. The
Mayor said a determination must be made if a road is needed between Eldamain and
Rt. 47,but that right of ways must be secured now while the land is still
undeveloped. Alderman Kot said that he expected opposition from citizens in
Page 3 of 11
River's Edge and White Oaks subdivisions. He also reminded the committee that
the Prairie Parkway is still being considered which would be a north/south road.
Alderwoman Spears felt that the City should wait until they had the $36,000 before
such a study is done. She said that the wording of the contract basically locked in
EEI and would preclude any other firms from submitting a bid. Mayor Prochaska
asked how EEI arrived at the $36,000 cost. The cost,according to Mr.Freeman,
was based on 4-5 other feasibility studies they have done in Kane County and the
costs were prorated.
The area of the study was then discussed. At this time, there are 10 homes near the
river that would be affected. Mr. Whitehouse stated that developers are already
talking to property owners in that area. Another consideration was to tie in the
extension with Greenbriar and possibly as far as Rte. 71. With the proposed
development south of the City, Mr. Whitehouse said there would be a need for many
people to get across the river.
Alderman Kot felt that this potential road should not become a truck route, but
rather be an alternative road. In addition, Alderwoman Ohare said she did not want
to see another Rt. 59. She also questioned if this would hurt the Rt. 47 businesses.
Mayor Prochaska said those businesses are complaining that the traffic backups are
actually a deterrent. Alderman Sticka felt it made sense to do the study now before
houses are built. Approval for the project was expressed by Alderman James who
said it made sense and was a smart investment to use today's dollars.
This item will moved to City Council consent agenda for a vote.
PRESENTATION
Jeff Hyman and Lynn Whitman of Burnside Construction were present and
represented the Villas of the Reserve. They attended this meeting to answer any
questions the committee might have. This item has been to Economic Development
and will be scheduled for a public hearing.
Mr. Hyman explained they have a 25-acre site on Rt. 71 just west of a commercial
area on Rt. 47. They are planning 84 duplex units totaling 42 buildings. They have
already presented this to the Plan Commission and have taken into consideration,
some of the comments made by the Commission.
They plan to relocate some of the wetlands and allow the existing creek bed to
remain and re-channel part into a detention pond.
Page 4 of 11
A 28-foot wide access lane that will be privately maintained by the homeowner's
association will lead to the duplexes. The units are 2-bedroom or 2 bedroom/den
and will be age-targeted. Potential buyers being targeted are newly married couples
or empty-nesters. Ranch houses and 2-story homes are being planned with a
bedroom on the first floor of the 2-story homes. The sizes will range from 1450-
1750 square feet and prices are projected to start in the low$200's.
Mr. Hyman commented that as a result of suggestions at the Economic
Development meeting, his company would incorporate no less than 40% masonry
on the front elevation of the units. Full brick will be included on units where the
entire side is in full view. He asked the committee to extend some "architectural
license" so that various features could be used to avoid an institutional look.
The home plans are designed to look like single family homes and will have 2-car
front-loaded and side-loaded garages. Earth tones will be incorporated on the
exteriors. Mr. Hyman requested consideration of the reduction of the setbacks from
30 feet to 20 feet. Alderwoman Ohare commented that she was glad to see duplexes
brought into the area.
Alderman Kot asked how the side road leading to the units will align with the
existing businesses. Mr. Hyman answered that it is located off to the side of the
Shell property.
A public hearing is scheduled for August 24th for annexation..
DETAIL BOARD REPORT(Bill List)
Many items from the bill list were discussed and the following were discussed more
at length:
1. Page 29: Administrative-Bank Reconciliations—approximately$1700 was
spent for an outside service to verify bank reconciliations, in the absence of
the County Clerk performing this duty. It was recommended that an outside
agency verify the reconciliation's for 15 bank accounts so that a City
employee is not verifying their own work. Alderman Spears suggested
reviewing the contract for the outside firm due to the amount charged and
asked for a copy of the invoice.
2. Page 6: Speedway legal charges—legal charges are usually billed back to
the other party unless the action results from staff-related purposes.
3. Several other billbacks were also discussed briefly.
4. Page 12: Previous note-taker Gail Denton is being paid for past services.
5. Page 23: Library Board meetings—The Board requested a note-taker so the
Board member currently performing that duty could participate in the
meeting
The bill list now moves to City Council for approval on consent agenda.
Page 5 of 11
ITEMS RECOMMENDED BY COMMITTEE FOR CONSENT AGENDA:
(Discussed out of order)
1. Police Reports for June 2004
Alderman Kot pointed out that is was very significant that the crime rate in
Yorkville had dropped 18.7% from 2002 to 2003 and said that was a testament to
the fme job by the Police Department.
6. Grande Reserve Well#9
Alderwoman Spears asked if a spreadsheet was being compiled regarding well#9
costs. Mr. Graff replied that city employee, Jill, monitors those costs.
Alderwoman Ohare questioned why water pump#3 was so much deeper. This was
due to water loss during the pump malfunction and quantity of water pumped
according to the Public Works Director.
3. Grande Reserve Earthwork Letter of Credit
This letter of credit for earthwork is to insure that the credit does not run out. This
agreement is slated for renewal on October 10, 2004
As there was no further discussion on any other items of this portion of the agenda,
the above items will be placed on the City Council consent agenda.
MINUTES FOR APPROVAL/CORRECTION:
1. AdHoc Tourism, January 12, 2004
Mayor Prochaska reported it was the consensus of the Tourism committee to
approve the minutes of January 12, 2004. He also said City Clerk Jackie
Milschewski asked that it be added--that was the last meeting of that committee.
MAYOR
1. Master Facility Plan
At the request of the department heads, a survey was sent out to other municipalities
about 10 days ago. Not all are turned in yet. Alderwoman Burd asked what the
survey was for. The staff had given recommendations regarding the master plan,
but they wanted additional input in writing from other towns.
This item moves to the next C.O.W.
Page 6 of 11
2. Intergovernmental Agreement with Forest Preserve/Hoover Property
The agreement was presented at this meeting for review and Mayor Prochaska said
he would like input from Laura Brown. There was a brief discussion regarding
some minor changes to the agreement and the possible use of effluent as a land
application on sports fields within the Forest Preserve. Mr. Graff noted there may
be grants available to facilitate the land application and the City will talk with the
Forest Preserve District personnel.
This item will be brought back to C.O.W.
3. Greenspace--Countryside Property Owners
A meeting at Congregational Church will be held August 30th regarding the green
space at Countryside Subdivision. Since the Mayor cannot be present for the
meeting, either Dan or Kelly Kramer will be there for a legal presentation. A
mailing will be sent to the residents and an article placed in the paper to instruct
residents to bring plats or other papers to this meeting. Alderwoman Spears and
Alderman Besco requested written information regarding items that will be
discussed that night.
4. Fox Hill SSA Ordinance
The ordinance was presented and Alderman Munns stated that maintenance of the
public parks and trails should not be included, nor should snow removal on the
trails. An informal vote of the committee was taken to decide if this language
should remain in the ordinance. Three members stated it should be left in the
ordinance while seven stated it should be removed. It was noted by Administrator
Graff that the annual tax levy was $283.46. The ordinance will be revised by
Friday.
Item moves to City Council for a vote.
5. Galena Road (Rosenwinkel Property) Water Main Easement
Since there are multiple owners of the affected property and not all have signed an
agreement granting the easement,this item was tabled. When all agreements are
signed,this item will be brought to the City Council rather than C.O.W. It was
noted that the property owners who had signed, agreed to $10 payments.
6. Clean-up Route 34—Adopt a Highway
The aldermen/alderwomen are responsible for cleanup of Rte. 34 from Cannonball
to Eldamain. Saturday, August 28th will be scheduled as a cleanup day.
Page 7 of 11
7. Aldennanic Ward Map - Update
Administrator Graff presented an updated ward map and noted that Ward 4 had
greatly increased. Mayor Prochaska stated that a new guideline requires that any
new areas must be contiguous to the ward. He noted that no new redistricting can
be done until 2010, the next decennial census. City personnel will speak with the
Attorney General about a possible special census before that time. The Mayor said
he would like the City Council to ratify the map as shown. The Hoover property
was briefly discussed and Mayor Prochaska stated that a private party owns the
property now. That owner would be asked at a later time to annex it to the City.
This item will move forward to the City Council agenda for a vote.
8. Coffee with the Mayor—Ace Hardware
Mayor Prochaska will hold a"Coffee with the Mayor" at Ace Hardware. He said
normally he does not hold coffees outside the City limits;however,the City is in
discussions with them for annexation.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
1. Cara Behrens Development Agreement
Mayor Prochaska noted that Cara Behrens had appeared before the Plan
Commission to request a change in zoning for 801 N. Bridge Street. Ms. Behrens is
requesting a business use for a previous residential use. Mr. Graff noted a minor
disagreement with the landscaper. At present,there is only three feet of green area,
on which nothing grows, between that property and the one to the south. The
adjacent property owner was contacted about allowing additional land to be added
to the three-foot piece to form a berm. That owner stated he was also interested in
rezoning his property for office space. Mr. Graff suggested to the owner to work
with the adjacent property owner for an easement and then to return to the City
regarding rezoning. The property owner was told he would need to produce an
exhibit to bring to the City Council.
Alderman Sticka reminded the committee that several months ago an architectural
overlay of that area was done, but not well received by the public. That overlay was
completed to address that particular area of Rt. 47. He suggested that issue may
need to be revisited and perhaps the hours of business be restricted in that area.
Some of the property owners in that area felt the architectural standards were too
stringent and thus, resisted the plan.
Attorney Kramer stated hours of operation can be restricted when a development
agreement is done. Alderman Kot expressed concern if hours of operation were not
spelled out, in the event of the business changing hands in the future. Attorney
Page 8 of 11
Kramer felt that hours of operation should be placed on the overlay for a certain
district rather than applied to a certain business, which would be discriminatory.
Alderwoman Burd expressed further concern about houses being torn down for
business use, rather than the structure being preserved and renovated. Mayor
Prochaska stated that the EDC will focus on an"appearance code"to help preserve
some of the structures/architecture.
It was suggested by Alderwoman Spears that the overlay issue be placed on the next
C.O.W. for further discussion.
PARK BOARD
1. Naming of River's Edge South Park
Alderman James reported that a new park is being constructed in River's Edge. A
recommendation for a park name was suggested in a letter to the Park Board from
Mr. Virgil Rice's son. The suggestion of"Rice Park"would be named in honor of
Mr. Rice who owned the former Kendall County FS on Van Emmon and was also
active in many community endeavors.
This item moves to the City Council consent agenda.
PUBLIC WORKS
1. Hydraulic Avenue Interceptor Re-bid Results
Alderman Besco reported that an acceptable bid had been received from H. Linden
& Sons in the amount of$1,847,778. It was recommended that the bid be accepted
with the contract subject to legal staff review.
2. Discussion to Limit Parking on One Side of John Street at Park
The area in question is in Fox Hill and concerns cars parked on both sides of the
street near the park, creating a safety issue. An ordinance is required in order to
post signs in the hazardous area. It was determined that the problem primarily
exists during baseball season. It was suggested that temporary"no parking"signs
could be erected during the season,however, Mayor Prochaska pointed out that it
just pushes cars farther down the street. He suggested that an officer do a site
analysis and then this issue be brought back C.O.W.
Page 9 of 11
3. Van Emmon Overlay Update
Alderman Besco reported that MFT funds cannot be used and that the overlay
would be in excess of$15,000 and would be considered cosmetic. It was suggested
to not include this on the in-town road program as there are roads more needy of
repair. It was suggested by Alderman Kot that since it would be a minimal cost, it
should be considered as an option later. The Mayor said that it could be considered
at the end of the year when extra money might be available for capital expenditures.
He also said the tilting wall on the south should be looked at in the future.
4. EarthMover Credit Union's Request for a Water Variance
The variance is no longer needed as they brought water in. Their landscaper
mistakenly believed they could lay sod and then water it alternate days. This was
not true due to the conservation ordinance. Administrator Graff suggested this issue
be revisited at the Public Works level next fall as requests had been received from
homeowners and commercial owners for sod and front yard watering. He felt that
next year there would be enough water capacity. According to Administrator
Graff; over 100 violations were recorded during this past season and education was
needed to rectify this matter.
This item will move to the next Public Works agenda.
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
1. Hiring of Budgeted Employees
Another police officer can be hired effective August 1st and an additional position
will be filled January 1st if the budget permits. This hiring date will be earlier if
possible. Chief Martin said also a secretarial position is budgeted for August 1s`as
well. Alderwoman Ohare pointed out that the applicants already have their college
degrees. In conclusion, the first officer position will be approved and the second
one will be filled contingent on the budget.
This item moves to the City Council consent agenda.
ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE
1. ShredCo Contract for Records Disposal
The wording of the previously proposed contract contained language and items that
needed clarification. The contract presented at this meeting addressed the
discrepancies and is for a one-year period with 13 pickups a year. This revised
contract met with committee approval.
This moves to the City Council consent agenda.
Page 10 of 11
2. Joint Utility Bill Design
A copy of the proposed new bill was presented and feedback was solicited. The
cost of implementing this new combined bill is from$2,000 to $2,300,which will
be shared with the Sanitary District. The combined billing will reflect both phone
numbers,the billing cycle and read date and will show separate charges for the
Sanitary District. Alderwoman Spears suggested using different colors for the two
charges. It will be determined if that can be done since they are printed on a laser
printer. A letter will be sent to the Sanitary District so they understand the costs.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
In regards to a letter received regarding Glen Palmer Dam improvements,
Alderwoman Spears asked about an inter-governmental agreement that Attorney
Kramer is working on. It was clarified by Mr. Graff that IDNR provided the
agreement draft and the letter was Attorney Kelly Kramer's review.
A recent mailing by the Friends of the Fox River contained information regarding
the dam removal and also thanked the City of Yorkville for being a sponsor of the
river cleanup. Alderwoman Spears felt this might appear to be a conflict of interest.
Mayor Prochaska said that at this point, no action will be taken.
Alderman Munns reported a problem with mini-motorcycles using bike paths in Fox
Hill. Chief Martin said he is reviewing ordinances from other towns and will
present them at the next Public Safety Meeting on August 26th.
A citizen recently approached Alderwoman Ohare regarding the spelling of the
street named Fremont. The original spelling contained only one"e";however, the
street signs show"Freemont" as the spelling. A petition was signed by all residents
of the street to reflect the spelling as"Fremont". That petition will be forwarded to
the Clerk's office and new signs will be ordered. Attorney Kramer will change the
spelling on the plat and will draft an ordinance to correct this.
Alderman Sticka asked if any information had been received as to why the County
had not paid their share of the USGS study. Mayor Prochaska will be attending the
Mayor's meeting Wednesday night and will address this issue.
Mayor Prochaska received a copy of a letter from the County Engineer, addressed to
Lakewood Homes. The County is requesting that the developers pay the County for
the improvements to Eldamain Road. The amount is$18,000 now and additional
Page 11 of 11
money is to come from future commercial development. The Mayor will express
his concern at the Mayor's meeting,that the County should first discuss this with
the towns.
As there was no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:50pm.
Minutes respectfully submitted by
Marlys Young, Minute Taker
Pagelofl8 DcFT
Yah
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Tuesday, September 7, 2004
7:00 P.M.
City Conference Room
Committee Members Present: Mayor Art Prochaska, Alderman Joe Besco,
Alderwoman Val Burd, Alderman Paul James, Alderman Larry Kot, Alderman Marty
Munns, Alderwoman Wanda Ohare, Alderwoman Rose Spears, Alderman Rich Sticka,
City Treasurer Bill Powell, Administrator Tony Graf l; Attorney Dan Kramer, Police
Chief Harold Martin,Public Works Director Eric Dhuse, Park&Rec Director Laura
Brown, Finance Director Traci Pleckham
Guests: See Attached Sheet.
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm by Mayor Art Prochaska.
Public Hearing: None
Presentations: None
Detail Board Report (Bill List): Mayor Art Prochaska asked those present if there were
any comments or questions regarding the bill list.
It was requested by the Committee to move the page number to a point that was visible
and to print on the front and back of the paper to save paper. Traci Pleckham stated that
they usually do use front and back, but will address both issues with the office
employees.
Alderwoman Spears had a question regarding the bills from EEI and Walter E. Deuchler
&Associates. She questioned how the Committee would know which bills are
reimbursable to the City. Traci Pleckham stated that if the funds are reimbursable to the
City they will be marked under A/R—OTHER account. Alderwoman Spears went on to
question if the total on page 7 from Walter E. Deuchler&associates in the amount of
$106, 919.85 was all billable to the City with out reimbursement coming. Traci
Pleckham stated that was all billable to the City.
Mayor Art Prochaska asked the Committee if there were any more questions. It was
moved to send the bill list to City Council as Consent Agenda along with all items on the
list that were recommended by Committee for Consent Agenda as follows:
1. Building Permit Reports for July 2004
2. Greenbriar Unit 4—Letter of Credit—PW 8/23/04
3. Hiring of Water Department Operator—PW 8/23/04
4. Raintree Unit 1 —Bond Reduction#1 —PW 8/23/04
1
Page 2 of 18
5. Route 34 Improvements— Supplemental MFT Appropriation Resolution—PW
8/23/04
6. Police reports for July 2004—PS 8/26/04
Mayor's Report: Mayor Art Prochaska stated that the Coffee with the Mayor will be at
the Riverfront Park on September 11th from 9:00- 11:00 a.m. Mayor Prochaska stated
that also on September 11th 2004 the City will be having the 3rd annual Patriot's Walk.
The walk will be at 6:30 p.m. starting at City Hall and ending at Towne Square Park.
The Mayor added that he had spoken to Chief Martin regarding having traffic halted on
Route 47 while the moment of silence is done during the ceremony to keep noise
reduced. This is so that the time can be used for reflection and not overrun by the noise
from traffic and loud trucks going by which occurred the previous year. He stated that
traffic will be stopped at Somonauk Street and across the bridge.
Economic Development Committee: Mayor Art Prochaska moved the meeting on to
discuss the topics for EDC.
1.) The first item to be discussed is the Fire Department's request for Development Fee
Increase from a Facility Planning Study from the EDC's 7/21/04 meeting. The Mayor
introduced Chief Michael Hitzemann with the Bristol Kendall Fire Department to discuss
the topic at hand.
Chief Michael Hitzemann started the discussion by explaining how the issue came about
from the last EDC Committee Meeting. The Mayor added that basically the increase
would bring the fee up to $500.00 for Single Residential, $500.00 per unit for Multi-
residential, and up to $0.16 per sp ft W/$500.00 minimum for Commercial.
Alderman Sticka went on to say that at the EDC meeting it was discussed that the City
does need some justification when a fee increase comes about. He also said that the
Committee did receive a lot of information about future plans the Fire Department has,
but the fees that are suggested are the result of the mean of what the Fire Department
found other local communities are charging. Mr. Sticka questioned if that is a defensible
way to arrive with a final fee. City Attorney, Dan Kramer responded saying that
"standard Illinois is uniquely attributable to what we are facing". He also agreed with
Alderman Sticka in the fact that the Study is a useful way in comparing,there are a lot of
differences in the standards in different States on Impact Fees and Developer issues
where they cannot do Impact Fees as Home Ruled, but they can negotiate as part of an
agreement. Mr. Kramer went on to state that the guide in Illinois is equally attributable to
the Developer or actual cost and future cost. Mr. Sticka stated that the future needs
provided are quite significant and there is no question about these needs having to be met.
Mr. Sticka stated that the amount of the fees chosen to charge the Public needs to be
related to the needs the Fire Department has, not what is charged in local communities.
Alderman Kot added that the City's Coding Inspector, Mr. Dettmer sent out a memo
saying that `I do not agree that the consultant justified the proposed amount of increase in
this report.' Mr. Kot stated with that being in writing in a Public Document,the City
2
Page 3 of 18
should make sure they have the right justification before moving forward with the fee
increase.
Mayor Prochaska moved on to summarize that the Committee is saying that they do not
disagree with the Fire Department needing the money to use towards future needs,they
just need to come up with justification in the amount of the fee increase that is chosen.
Mayor Prochaska also pointed out that in three of the Communities in the Study;there is
no fee for Commercial protection, also having one Community charge only a flat fee.
These are Communities that Yorkville is competing with for growth in bringing in new
Commercial Development. He stated that the Committee should be aware of how this
will impact the City and that the EDC has been working well with the City on these
issues by justifying the costs needed. Mayor Prochaska said he feels that the Committee
is on the right track. Mr. Sticka agreed with the Mayor that the City does not want to
push Commercial Development away with the fees, which will then bring a negative
effect with the loss of tax dollars.
Alderwoman Spears questioned Chief Hitzemann about if the Department had equipment
now that would maintain a fire in anything above a 3 story structure and if not how much
would that equipment cost to purchase and house. Chief Hitzemann stated that they do
not have a ladder truck with those capabilities now. A new ladder truck would be about
$700,000.00 to $750,000.00 and the Department does have a place to house that now.
She also questioned Chief Hitzemann about what other equipment would be needed to
handle 4-6 story structures. Chief Hitzemann stated that the balance of additional
equipment would be minimal;the money mainly would be needed for training as far as
the difference in form of fire suppression activity. The cost of the training that would be
needed could not be determined at this point. The Committee briefly discussed how the
ladder truck would be needed for larger structures as well as the taller structures too.
Mayor Prochaska rounded up the conversation by asking Chief Hitzemann if he could tie
a justification up with the fee requested as the City's Attorney, Mr. Kramer has
suggested. The Committee suggested for Chief Hitzemann to gather information of what
the amount is needed from the Consultants to help gathering support. The Committee
also agreed to help in the gathering of information for the justification for the Fire
Department's Fee Increase. Mayor Prochaska informed Chief Hitzemann to bring this
back to COW as soon as ready.
2.) The item of the Revised Landscape Ordinance was moved to be tabled due to lack of
not having the strike-out version in the packets. It will be moved to the next COW
meeting.
3.) Mayor Prochaska moved the meeting on to discuss the issue of the Appearance Code
from the EDC 8/19/04 meeting. He introduced Anna Kurtzman from the Building
Department to start the discussion on the issue after bringing up three questions that have
come up from home-owners.
1. The first question brought up is regarding masonry on Duplexes, Single-family
attached(i.e.town homes) and multi-family(i.e. apartments). The Mayor
3
Page 4 of 18
questioned if the language should read to encourage a greater amount of masonry
along the frontages that face a street. As the language is written now the building
has to be at least 50%masonry on the front,with the remaining 50%being place
on one or more of the remaining sides of the building. The Mayor stated if the
language is changed and someone was to build with a completing bricked front,
the builder could then use the extra 50%of front brick towards credit to having to
have the building at least 50%bricked.
2. Location of Bay Doors on Industrial buildings: The present language indicates
that bay doors on industrial building should not be visible from the street. Is this
standard reasonable in the middle of an industrial park? Should this restriction be
place on the following types of streets: Arterials, Collector that serve more that
one type of zoning district, Streets that are maintained by other governments, and
streets that provide a boundary between the industry and some other type of
zoning district? The Mayor stated that once you get into an Industrial park and
you need big turning radiuses for the trucks, it begins to get difficult to build the
large roads to get to the back of the buildings for access to loading docks. The
City should be encouraging the growth of the Commercial Development in the
area. The Committee questioned what the City would do if they had a road that is
a collector road that has industrial more than a mile away from the residential
area? The Committee agreed that it is hard to pinpoint all the future situations the
City will have to deal with. Mayor Prochaska stated he wanted the change made
to the language to ease the traffic conditions in an Industrial Park. Mayor
Prochaska also added that they should add that if there is no way to prevent the
bay doors from being visible to the road,the Company will have to buffer, so not
to have direct view from the road with landscaping.
3. Applicability of Existing Buildings: Do we need further clarification of how to
handle modifications to non-residential buildings? For example, if there is an
existing non-residential building that does not meet the proposed standards and an
addition is proposed for that building—does the addition and/or the original part
of the building need to comply with the rest of the ordinance: What happens if an
accessory building is proposed on a lot where there is an existing primary
building and the primary building does not meet the ordinance? Does it make
sense to have the accessory structure meet a more intensive standard than the
primary building?
The Committee discussed this issue and found they agreed to let the owners build
matching what already exists on the lot, but encourage bettering the look.
4. How to address in-fill development: Should this ordinance be applied universally
throughout the City or should certain areas be exempt, such as within existing
areas that are essentially built-out(as Fox Industrial Park)?
Mayor Prochaska asked if they should allow the same types of buildings to be
built in these built-out areas. The Committee discussed how the City handles
4
Page 5 of 18
other types of zoning improvements and what needs to be up to code. Alderman
James suggested that the City sets what their standards will be and then handle the
issues that need to be handled case by case for these few and far between
situations. Mayor Prochaska stated that variances are only for hardships only and
that even set backs are 40%of the building is what you match. In the case of in-
fill areas the Mayor would like to see the new buildings matching what is
surrounding it. Mr. Kramer clarified that `nearby buildings' would be clarified as
`buildings that have frontage of the street they're on'. The Committee brought up
that if they are going to allow new buildings to look like the older style around
them to be built, what is the point of the appearance code? They discussed maybe
just going back to say what the standard will be and let that be it.
Mr. Joe Wisniewski with Wise Construction who is a business owner in town
steps up to speak with the Committee regarding the appearance code issue. Mr.
Wisniewski stated that he has been in the building business for 28 years and has
seen appearance codes come and be changed, altered, and have things thrown out.
He stated that some times they get over board in saying masonry or block which
still doesn't make the building look pleasant. He feels that what is being left out
of these appearance codes is the part of the City's stating that they are open to
builders presenting different ideas in any situation that may not meet the
appearance code and are open without a variance to look at it. The City still can
have the right to say no and then the builder can file for a hardship. He feels the
City's are being too strict in how all the buildings have to be made.
Mayor Prochaska reiterated that is how the variance process works,but is only for
dealing with hardships. Alderman Sticka stated that this is the same situation that
came up at the Architectural Committee, where a group of people will come up
with an approval. The Committee agreed that they see how Mr. Wisniewski is
stating that there is no leeway for creativity with the Appearance Code. Anna
Kurtzman with the Building Department stated that the way it is written now, any
one looking to build without fitting the code would have their plan review by a
Facade Committee(a recommending body), not the Zoning Committee. She
stated that the last paragraph of the Appearance Code is where this is pointed out
already.
Mr. Wisniewski pointed out that he currently is working with a Customer who is
dealing with an Appearance Code that states must use Masonry material and is
now using Stucco Board,which is not the nicest looking out. He stated a lot of
people building do not want to spend the money necessary to get the look the
Committee members are probably looking for. He also recommended that the
City focus mainly on making sure people in the more noticeable areas keep the
appearance up and not worry so much about the areas that are out of the general
public's sight.
Alderman Sticka stated that the City is just looking to better the look of the City
with the Appearance Code as a response to the Public. Mayor Prochaska added to
5
Page 6 of 18
state that appeals may be made for architectural preferences, but will be decided
by this Committee. Alderwoman Burd stated that standards should be set up to
keep from having builders feel that they may have their different ideas judged
unevenly if it does go to the Façade Committee. Mayor Prochaska stated that it
should also state in some form that there has to be a reason the builder wishes to
go against the code besides just not liking the code.
Alderman Sticka questioned Mr. Wisniewski as to ever experiencing someone in
the town saying 'yes' or 'no' when there is no Appearance Code present. Mr.
Wisniewski stated that if there are no rules or codes it will be a subjective process.
The more the restrictive he sees the towns try to make it,he feels the towns are
not accomplishing there goals as far as keeping the main town and arteries
looking pleasant. Mr. Wisniewski brought up a situation of taking Mr. Kramer's
property as is now with wood siding and wanting to add a storage building out
back for papers. With the Appearance Code going thru as is now, Mr. Kramer
would now have to put up a Masonry building to add that to his business,which
just would not look even or compatible.
Mayor Prochaska stated that at this point with the Appearance Code,the City is
speaking only of new buildings going up in new growth areas, in-fill development
or add-ons to existing buildings. He would like it appealed thru the Facade
Committee only for an Architectural Uniqueness. Mr. Sticka questioned how the
Committee would address the issue of someone following the code by using an
unpleasant product which Mr. Wisniewski brought up earlier. Mr. Sticka
questioned if every building should then be brought back to the Committee for
final approval to solve this issue. Mr. Wisniewski at this point stated that in
Communities close to Yorkville,there are towns that are to the point of telling
builders how much brick should be a certain color even. Mr. Wisniewski
reflected that the Appearance Code is a necesisity; yet don't take it too far.
Mayor Prochaska directed Anna Kurtzman with wording the last paragraph more
to the point that the City will send to the Facade Committee anything that is
Architecturally Creative to be considered and make more prominent in the
Appearance Code.
Alderman Kot brought up the point that the Appearance Code does have to go up
for Public Hearing. Mr. Kramer responded strongly with a definite need for
Public Hearing. Mayor Prochaska asked to have this issue come back to COW
with some corrections based on the discussion that was had this evening, at that
point the Committee can look at scheduling the Public Hearing.
Anna Kurtzman stated that she understands what the Committee has requested
from the discussion and is also looking into putting 3-4 points in to provide some
very broad guidelines for the Façade Committee.
6
Page 7 of 18
4) Mayor Prochaska moved the meeting onto the Fox Hill Unit 7 POD 10—
Preliminary/Final Plat—EDC 8/19/04 discussion. Alderman Sticka stated that EDC
Committee was okay with all information provided at the last meeting. Mr. Marvin
DeLahr passed out for the Committee a copy of the Elevations and the Control
Foundation Plan.
David Meek, Attorney with Quarles&Brady LLP spoke regarding the issue of Fox Hill.
The plat has been revised as presented this evening. They have brought the set-backs into
conformance for the most part. There is still a 25ft set back from the Lane off of
Eldamain. He stated there were a few constraints which related to how much land was
given to the City for Rob Roy Creek. They are here tonight to do the 4th amendment for
approval to get final plat.
Alderman Sticka brought up the building elevations that were in question at EDC
meeting. Mayor Prochaska and Alderman Sticka also discussed how the Plan
Commission was questioning why they were asking for a variation without telling the
City what was to be put there. The Committee discussed that the variation had
justification at this point and would have been okay if had been justified at the Plan
Commission. The Committees recommendation at this point is to move forward. The
Committee discussed the plat details with the large plans provided. The Committee
discussed where parking, garages, lot lines, easements, and access will be. The question
of who will be doing road maintenance was brought up by Alderwoman Ohare. The City
will take care of the streets, and the home-owners Association will take care of the drive
up to the actual drives.
The Committee agreed for the Staff to move forward with setting up a date for this to go
for Public Hearing.
5) Villas at the Preserve—Annex, Zoning &preliminary Plan—CC pub hear 8/24/04.
Alderman Sticka stated this issue has gone thru EDC and was approved. Mr. Graff stated
that they need to have Staff review and there are a couple of policy questions that need to
be addressed in the agreement. Mr. Kramer stated one of the policy questions he needs to
back-up for the special service tax area language which is traditionally used. The other
question was in regards to what the Park Board recommending into land cash donations
which is generally collected at building permit time. The Park Board would like to have
the latitude they need to collect that money at Plat time, which they would have the City
Council take care of that. Laura Brown stated this is requested to have more flexibility
with funds in building some of the other Parks and will not take as long as it did in
collecting money with the Country Hills Subdivision. It will also allow the Park&Rec
Department to get some other parks on line faster.
The Committee discussed that there are going to be 84 buildings with 2 units in each with
a total of 168 populations. This will bring in$123,480.00. Mayor Prochaska stated he
does not have a problem with the Committee looking into the funds coming earlier, but
this does need to go to City Council to have it move forward.
7
Page 8 of 18
Alderwoman Ohare questioned if there is no park planned in this Subdivision, only a
trail, can the City request funds at an earlier time to be used for other Parks. Mayor
Prochaska stated that in other circumstances,the City has had Developers volunteer the
money up front for the City to use right away. Laura Brown added that this money
always goes to Regional Services, so if they are using the money towards parks in the
area for those Residents to use locally. Tony Graff stated that maybe they could have
Laura Brown talk with the Developer regarding this issue to explain the need and see if
first they are willing to put a percentage of the money up front and then pay the rest later
by their own doing. Mayor Prochaska suggested the idea that maybe they could even
give in 3rds to break up the payment more.
Gary Taylor, Attorney who is representing the Developer in question, approached the
Committee stating that he believes the Developer would be willing to pay half of the
funds at Platting and the other half could be spread out over the building permits. The
Committee thanked him for his willingness to help out.
Tony Graff asked Dan Kramer about the last paragraph on page 6 of the Annex
Agreement. Mr. Graff stated that the language regarding `these Development Ordinances
shall be frozen from the date of this Agreement and any amendments to these
Development Ordinances shall not apply to the Subject Realty except as stated for life
safety issues.' Mr. Graff asked if the City is going to be freezing all Ordinances, or is
this going to be universally applied to all Developers. Mr. Kramer stated what the City is
doing is having a freeze as far as the Building Code for a period of 3 years or 5 years,
except for Public Health or Safety Issue. Mayor Prochaska stated as this Agreement
reads now it will be frozen for a 20 year period. Mr. Kramer replied that is an issue that
he will help clean up with`Gary'.
The Committee agreed that this will come back by 9/21/04 COW and then set up for
Public Hearing with City Council on 9/28/04.
Park Board: Park&Rec Director Laura Brown stated that this is coming before the
COW Committee is because IDNR has asked for the City to give them a conceptual
drawing and then grading plans so that may match it with their plans for the Dam
reconstruction. Laura went over the actual Conceptual Park Plan drawing provided and
showed how they incorporated the Park&Rees plans with the Darn Reconstruction and
Canoe shoots that IDNR has planned.
Laura Brown explained that the Amphitheatre that was previously planned can no longer
be placed down by the river due to the noise the canoe shoots are going to cause. She
explained the differences of how the park appears now and what will be occurring when
IDNR comes in to do their work. She also explained that the gentleman who developed
the Canoe bypass also develops these out in Colorado and has done work with the
Olympic shoots.
Laura Brown stated that if the Committee would okay the plans and send onto City
Council, they can get the plans to IDNR to let them proceed on their end. IDNR will be
8
Page 9 of 18
providing most of the fill to make the canoe shoot possible. She also stated that Phase 1
of the Dam reconstruction will begin next summer.
The bridge that is pictured on the Conceptual Plans is an upgrade, which would be at the
City's expense, is not what would be provided by IDNR in their Phase 2. It has been
recommended to upgrade to something more visual due to the attraction it would give
from the Route 47 Bridge. The Committee also discussed the issue of having a fountain
for the kids to enjoy at the new park.
Phase 2 would begin in year 3-4, depending on how long it takes to reconstruct most of
the Dam and get the canoe shoot dug out and completed. Laura Brown stated that every
improvement made on the ground will be the City's cost and will be done in Phases. The
parking lots and canoe launch will be completed first so that the facility can be used as
soon as possible.
The total park will be approximately a 5 acre park. The Committee agreed to move this
forward with IDNR to keep the process flowing. Laura Brown informed the Committee
that they will need to make a decision regarding the Conceptual Bridge within the next 6-
8 months as well. The City can decide the details of what is actually placed where on
land at a later time,IDNR just needs the Conceptual plans to move forward on their end.
Laura Brown stated she will go now and put together a 3-4 phase process of how the Park
will come together with this being Land cash funding. She pointed out this is one of the
areas where the money will be going for Regional funding from the new Developments
since all of the Public will be using the facilities.
Administration Committee: The meeting moved ahead on the Agenda to discuss the
Grande Reserve Central,North, and South SSA Establishing Ordinances. Peter Raphael
from the Grande Reserve started the discussion stating these Ordinances establish the
SSA and will not be adopted this evening. He explained that it is now time to establish
these areas so that the next step will be a later date to come back and ask for the bond
ordinance which will allow the issuance of the bonds. The first bonds that will need to be
issued will be in the Central area, with the North and South area bonds being a necessity
at a later date. It was explained that the Central Region is from Bristol Ridge up to
BNRR on the map provided. Mayor Prochaska stated this will cover infrastructure costs.
There was no response from the Public Hearing that was previously held on the issue.
Alderwoman Spears questioned if the City should be comfortable with SSA after what
has happened in Montgomery with that City having a hard time with collecting the tax
from the home-owners. It was explained that Montgomery had SAA in their area, and
SSA has been recommended to the City. Mayor Prochaska made the Committee aware
that they need to speak to the County Clerks Office as far as covering the County's
additional costs that they will have from setting up these SSA's. Mr. Kramer stated that
they have proactively set-up an administrative fee for the County to cover these costs that
will be endured. Mr. Raphael also added that each of the SSA's already having an
9
Page 10 of 18
administrative fee to cover Trustee, County and City costs. Mr. Kramer stated that the
money owed by the home-owners will be directly billed on the real estate bills. That way
there is no separate billing.
Mr. Raphael stated that in October they will come to request the SSA Central Bond.
The Committee discussed that they should have informational packets available to the
public as to what the SSA is and how it works. A phone number available as well for the
public to have questions answered. The Committee agreed that point had to be stressed.
It was also pointed out by Mayor Prochaska to inform the Public that the people who are
buying these lots to come, are paying for all the improvements that go along with the
Development as well.
Mr. Kramer explained that if sales are slow,there will be reserved funds available to pay
the bonds with no recourse to the City. It will also not effect the City's credit rating.
There is also an outside Consultant who has been hired to make sure the bonds go thru
properly and make sure the public is informed about the SSA. With the SSA staying with
whoever owns the home down the road,the 800#will still be available to the Public as
needed until the SSA is paid off, Mr. Kramer recommended for the City itself not to get
involved in the informational end of the SSA issue so that the City does not have to
worry about having the proper disclosure.
The Committee discussed the difficulty of not being able to recapture the funds to build
schools with a SSA.
The Committee agreed to move this forward to the City Council Agenda.
Public Works Committee: The meeting moved back to the next item on the Agenda.
1) Subdivision Control Ordinance—COW 8/17/04: This issue will come back to COW
on 9/21/04 to give time for the corrections to be made that were brought up previously. It
was also brought up by Mr. Kramer that City Engineer,Joe Wywrot had suggested to
have the Developers report the range of depth on various utilities so that the City is
informed where they lay under ground. This can be added to the Subdivision Control
Ordinance before the next COW meeting as well.
2) USGS Groundwater Study—Phase 2 & 3 County Funding—PW 8/23/04: Alderman
Kot said the PW Committee chose to move along, except they were questioning why the
County had not contributed fully in Phase 1. Mayor Prochaska stated that this Study the
County had contributed fully to this Study; it was the Blackberry Creek Watershed Study
they voted on only partial funding. Alderwoman Ohare asked if these amounts did seam
reasonable to the Committee. Mr. Graff responded it was a justified amount. It was
discussed among the Committee members the point that as the City grows they will need
to know what shallow waters, down to 40feet,can be blended in with the rest of the
City's water supply. The money is to be budgeted in the years from 2005-2008 to pay for
the Study. As far as how the neighboring Communities were divided as to how much
10
Page 11 of 18
each will pay, it seems that was determined by how big the actual Community is in
population. Mr. Graff was asked to look into how these amounts were exactly
determined.
The Committee is being asked to be committed now due to USGS's budget starting in
November of this year. The Committee agreed to commit and this issue will move onto
the next City Council meeting with the information Mr. Graff receives regarding the
division of money from the different Communities. This will be brought not as Consent
Agenda.
3) Countryside Pump Station Bid Opening Results—PW 8/23/04: Alderman Kot
explained why the Public Works is agreeing with the recommendation of going with the
second lowest bid. Mr. Kramer agreed with the letter of recommendation for choice B)
WEMCo Model F6K-S and urged the Committee to move forward. With the money
being available for the higher bid the Committee agreed to send on to City Council as
Consent Agenda.
4) Deuchler Engineering Agreement for Bruell/Woodworth Pump Station—PW 8/23/04:
The PW Committee wants this to move forward as long as the language with the
Easements in section 2.4.4 is reviewed and excepted by Mr. Kramer. The COW
Committee agreed to move forward with this issue and put to City Council as Consent
Agenda. This will be paid for out of the Bond from Bruell Street
5) EEI Scope of Service for Southwest Watermain Project—PW 8/23/04: Mr. Kot
started the discussion stated that this is Developer driven;the only question that arose
was the funding for this. Mr. Graff replied that this will be funded by Developers. This
will be subject to receiving funds, which are expected to have some of the deposit in the
next few days. The City is negotiating the rest of the funding now. The Committee
agreed to move to City Council on Consent Agenda subject to receiving funding.
6) Water Works System Needs Assessment and Project Plan IEPA Loan—Re-initiation
and Re-submittal—PW 8/23/04: Mr. Graff stated that the City had submitted the IEPA
Loan plan based on the previous Business/Project Plan. He explained that the City now
has to do a re-submittal due to the IEPA had comments at the March/April review. The
City now has to have the re-submittal in by 11/01/04 to meet the new deadline. Once the
paperwork is in order and re-submitted, discretionary funds will be available since the
11/01/04 deadline will not be met. The next step will be to do a Public Hearing in
December as well as taking care of the notices and sign-offs. Tracy Pleckham and Mr.
Graff are confident to receive funds even with Yorkville being the second group that is to
be looked at. The fee from EEI will be approximately$15,000.00 to revise the Project
Plan and resubmit for the City of Yorkville. The Committee agreed to move this to City
Council on Consent Agenda.
7) Raintree Village—IDOT Highway Permit: This issue had a few technical changes
made according to Mr. Kramer, but is still the basic IDOT permit for doing roadway
improvements on Route 71 at Raintree Road. The Committee agreed this needs to keep
11
Page 12 of 18
moving forward. Mr. Kramer stated that the City needs to pass a resolution stating that
the City approves them for granting a permit at that location for the work to be done.
This will go onto City Council as Consent Agenda.
Public Safety Committee:
1) The Committee briefly discussed that the Police Department has recommended that the
Trick or Treat Hours for Halloween be kept from 4:00—7:00 p.m. even with Halloween
being on Sunday this year. This did not go to Public Safety due to the meeting date and
the next meeting will not be until early October and this needed to move on.
2) The PS Committee has had a request from Chief Martin to have a Crossing Guard
placed at Route 126 and Mill Street. The cost should be in the area of$3,750.00 for a
morning and afternoon guard for a year. Chief Martin stated he would like to revisit this
issue in 90 days to make sure the need is still there at that time. Chief Martin added that
Eric Dhuse is working to reduce the speed limit in the area thru IDOT to help out in that
area. The Committee agreed to move this to City Council as Consent Agenda subject to a
90 day review. Tracy Pleckham stated some of the money is available in the Crossing
Guard line item and some money can come out of the overtime line item. Chief Martin
has someone to fill in, if not take the position, until the job is filled for certain.
Administration Committee:
1-4) Alderman James started the discussion stating he would like to speak about the first
4 items on the Admin. Agenda together. They are all job descriptions that have been
identified as a need for the City to have filled now or in the near future. All of the
positions have been budgeted for already. Tracy Pleckham added that the budget called
for a Full-Time Accounting Clerk position and now the City Staff is only asking for a
Part-Time Position to be filled. All the job descriptions have been looked over by the
City's Labor Attorney and have been cleaned up accordingly.
Alderwoman Spears questioned what the salary will be for the Payroll Benefits
Specialist. Tracy Pleckham replied that the Committee had decided to stay around
$26,900.00 to $49,000.00 which is the same as General Support Administration.
Alderwoman Spears passed around handouts for the Committee which did show the
results of research she had done as far as surrounding Communities Office Staff Positions
filled and their Salary ranges. Alderwoman Spears stated this was done to show how few
positions were needed in other communities compared to what the City of Yorkville has.
Alderwoman Spears stated she felt it is not justified to have all the Positions that are now
being requested for Office Personnel. She stated that the right way for the City to go is in
hiring an Office Manager who can evenly distribute the work load the way the other
Communities are doing it.
Alderman James stated that the Committee should stick to the Personnel at Yorkville and
look at the work load they currently have and how it will change as the City continues to
12
Page 13 of 18
grow. Mayor Prochaska added that these positions were created do to a work study that
had previously been done to show where the City of Yorkville needed more employees.
Alderman James also stated with all the Development in the City boundaries,this is the
time to have more staff on hand to handle all the paperwork and phone calls that goes
along with it.
Alderwoman Spears and Alderwoman Burd questioned then how the other Communities
with comparable growth are handling their work load with fewer employees. It was
pointed out as far as Oswego goes;they have a Park District,not just a Park Department
like Yorkville. Oswego also has a Library District,not just a Library. All that
accounting is done thru the City's Accounting Department, unlike Oswego where their
Districts handle that Accounting work load themselves, not thru the City's main
Accounting Personnel. The Committee discussed the differences in how the
Communities are run as far as finance and accounting from the hand-outs Alderwoman
Spears brought to the Committee.
Mayor Prochaska reiterated the fact that the time study was done as justification for the
new job descriptions to be a necessity. This Committee at that time asked for the Job
Descriptions to be made and brought back and that is where the process stands now.
Alderwoman Ohare added that she has never seen the Staff not working at a constant
pace when she has been in and out of the City Offices. Alderman Sticka added that he
questioned if the Staff are at a point where they can't handle any more,then it is time to
add more Staff irregardless of what other Communities have employed as finance and
accounting Staff. Alderman Munns agreed that if the City's Employees are working a
normal business day and still having work left to be done constantly, then the City should
add some more positions. Once again Mayor Prochaska stated that this need was felt by
Staff, the work Study was done and has gone thru the COW Committee with
recommendation to City Council to approve. He also stated that when in the Committee
Meetings another task is found to need to be done;the question arises of who is going to
able to take on more work.
Alderwoman Burd moved on to ask if the Deputy Clerk here at Yorkville needs an
assistant when the position in Yorkville only entails Deputy Clerk work: Why are other
communities able to have just a Deputy Clerk do the work of the Deputy Clerk plus the
some of the Accounting work. Mayor Prochaska brought up the point that in other
Communities their City Clerks are Full-Time,where in Yorkville the City Clerk is not.
That puts the rest of that work onto the Deputy Clerk. Mr. Kramer added that in Oswego
they have Community Development that is separate with 3 planners with 1-2 Full time
Secretaries. In Yorkville,the Deputy Clerk handles a lot of that paperwork.
Alderman James stated that the Committee could handle it in one of two ways:
1)Take the recommendation from the Staff in the City Office.
2) Spend$10,000.00 to call a Consultant back in to judge if these are a necessity.
13
Page 14 of 18
Alderwoman Burd stated that her concern is to not always just add new positions, but
make sure the City's Offices have the work divided properly for the current Staff to be
able to handle easier. Alderman Munns stated that if it is felt that the office is not running
the way it should, that should be told to the proper Managers or Administrator to correct
the situation for the City.
City Treasurer Bill Powell approached the Committee regarding what Alderwoman Byrd
stated on how the work load could be divided differently. He stated that when he comes
into the City Office he sees the Finance Director is usually too busy working on other
things to be working on Finance. He feels that the City needs to take the extra busy work
away from her and give her time to work on Finance. By hiring a payroll/benefits
specialist that will take some of the extra work load away from the Finance Director. Mr.
Powell stated that he is in the Office quite often and fmds the employees always busy.
Mr. Graff added that to date the Finance Director has been asked again and again to look
into multi-year financial planning. This has not been done due to the lack of Staff to
handle the every day work that the Finance Director is currently taking on as well. He
stressed the point of hiring the Payroll/Benefits Specialist for the workload and to handle
the questions and problems that arise daily with an up to date education and knowledge
on the subject. Mr. Graff stated the one position of the Full-Time Janitor is something
that has to be filled immediately.
Alderman Kot stated that earlier this year this issue was addressed and it was told to City
Staff that help would be made available if they could hold out while everything was
processed properly. Alderman Kat did ask Mr. Graff if the Committee could have an
organizational chart as to how the Office will flow with the new positions. Alderman Kot
feels there is no question that these positions are a necessity for the City to run correctly.
Alderman James stated to the Committee that the Administration Committee all agreed to
the Job Descriptions as presented.
Alderwoman Spears questioned if the Experience and Education of the Payroll/Benefits
Specialist could be discussed. She felt that someone gaining this position should have
more than a High School Degree and 60 Credit Hours of College with Minimum 2 years
of Human Resource/payroll experience. Mayor Prochaska commented that the education
or experience should be based accordingly with the pay range. Alderwoman Spears
brought up that in the past when the City has hired at the lower education/experience
range,there have been issues with having to then pay to send that person to classes to
better qualify them to then be able to handle the work load. She would like to see the
City not make that mistake again. Alderwoman Spears requested that the job description
for the Payroll/Benefits Specialist specify that the person hired have an Associates
Degree. Alderwoman Spears also stated that she felt that the position that the
Payroll/Benefits Specialist would be taking on is not a Full-time position. Alderwoman
Ohare stated that she disagreed and feels that in this field information is constantly
changing and should be given the time to keep ahead of the work load.
14
Page 15 of 18
Mayor Prochaska moved on the conversation to state that the person hired will probably
not be the top in the field with a high pay scale. It should be a person with experience
and the knowledge to handle the tasks at hand. Mr. Graff added that this person will be
hiring new employees, looking at the benefits constantly, keeping the personnel files up
to date, etc.
Alderman James reminded the Committee that what they are looking at this evening is
just the job description,which describes the minimum the person to be hired, may have to
be a possible candidate to be hired.
Alderwoman Spears stated again that looking at the job description she feels this can not
possibly keep the new hire busy. She feels that this job along with the others up for
question can be handled in 10 minutes a week by the employees the City already has.
Alderman James moved the conversation along letting the Committee know these will be
coming up again in the near future for the hiring process. Mayor Prochaska stated to the
Committee that there job for the evening is to look at the actual job descriptions and
decide if that part can move forward. Mayor Prochaska stated that these four job
descriptions will be voted on separately.
Alderman James also asked the Committee if the job descriptions are passed will they
have to come back before the Committee before the City can start to hire for them.
Alderwoman Spears replied 'as history proves no,they can start to run an ad to hire
provided the position is already budgeted for'.
Alderman Sticka questioned who does the tasks now that the new positions will take on
when hired. Tracy Pleckham stated that if a current employee or spouse were to call in
now with Benefit questions,the only person available to answer those questions would be
the Accounting Clerk. The Accounting Clerk would have her job description re-
evaluated to take some of the work load off of Tracy Pleckham so that Tracy could move
on to some of the other requested work by the different Committees.
Alderwoman Spears stated that six months ago the City did have on person doing the
Accounting and all of the Human Resource work. The Committee reminded
Alderwoman Spears that at that point in time the Committee had identified the need to
separate the work and lesson the load on one person.
City Treasurer Bill Powell once again stepped in to say that he feels very strongly about
the need for Tracy Pleckham to have more assistance in the office so that the City Office
can run more efficiently and smoothly.
Alderman James asked the Committee to have all four of the Job Descriptions move
forward.
Mr. Graff added that this is a need for the City office to run. There are not enough people
to keep the Office running efficiently all the time, especially when others have vacation
15
Page 16 of 18
time away. There has got to be enough people to keep the City moving forward. He
questioned why this issue is not going over well, when six months ago it was brought to
the Committee and there was absolutely no disagreement.
Alderwoman Spears requested that these jobs be brought back before the COW
Committee before hiring begins. She also requested that a specific salary be clarified
before hiring due to past history with the hiring in the City Office. Mayor Prochaska
brought up the fact that the positions have to be set into a range,but the Council can
propose a hiring rate if they want.
Tracy Pleckham stated to the Committee that the Treasurer and she can not even get to
the projects they want to work on because of the lack of help in the office. As far as her
and her one other employee in her department letting others help with the Human
Resource end,that would be against confidentiality laws. Tracy Pleckham stated that all
of the positions in question have been budgeted for at a higher rate than what is actually
needed.
The Committee moved to move all four job descriptions on to City Council for
consideration.
The Committee discussed to not allow hiring a new employee at the top of the range.
Alderman James stated he felt that it was a bad idea to set a salary before resumes are
even looked at. He feels that will disqualify a good potential employee before even
speaking with them.
Alderman Sticka brought up the point that it seems to him that it is felt by some
Committee Members that someone who is presently working for the City is currently
being paid too much for the work they are doing. Mr. Sticka asked what has made this
feeling come about. Alderwoman Spears brought up that an employee was moved into a
new position with the approval of Administration to be paid at entry-level range. Later
the fact that the person was hired at mid-level salary range. This event became
disheartening to Alderwoman Spears that the Staff did not take direction from the
Council. Alderman Sticka then questioned if she felt that person was being paid too
much. Alderwoman Spears replied that that was not what she was saying.
Mayor Prochaska brought up the point that the City will get the best person for the money
paid. Mayor Prochaska stated that Alderwoman Spears is probably right regarding the
way the economy is today, that the City should be able to find the right person closer to
the entry-level range.
Alderwoman Ohare requested once again that the Committee have made available an
organizational chart showing what work goes to whom.
5) NIU Graduate Internship Program Contract—Admin 8/12/04: Tony Graff stated that
they are still waiting for the actual contract from NIU. NIU has formally accepted Mr.
Olson into the Internship Program and has been assigned to the City. The Contract will
16
Page 17 of 18
bind him with the City for a two year program. This topic will come back to the next
COW meeting.
*Alderwoman Burd stated that she had thought of speaking to Northern regarding them
being able to help the City with their set-up as far as the flow in the Offices. She also
brought up that there is a group of retired City Officials that will also help in the set-up
process. Mayor Prochaska stated that the City did have Northern come and do an
assessment of their services and had a presentation given to them when it was complete.
6) Mr. Graff started the discussion explaining that Provena provides the standard drug
testing regulated by DOT. Alderman Munn stated the specifications that require this type
e of testing and brought up the fact that the price should be negotiated due to the high
price listed. He requested that whoever is in charge of setting up the testing for the City
have them negotiate the price down to at least$45.00 instead of the$55.00 requested.
The Committee asked if this was a time issue to have done. Laura Brown and d Eric
Dhuse stated that presently they do not have anyone doing the DOT testing and it should
be completed immediately. Laura Brown also stated that there's a memo missing from
the packet that explained the fact that it was looked into and was reviewed by Dunbar&
Shaw. The Committee advised Laura Brown to move forward and speak with Provena
regarding the price issue to see if they are negotiable. Alderman Munn highly
recommended to the Committee that the testing could be found to be done cheaper
elsewhere if Provena is not negotiable. Mr. Graff stated that this needs to move forward
since there are 8 employees waiting to be tested. The Committee decided to move this
onto City Council with the pricing pending.
Executive Session: The Committee decided to hold off until the next COW meeting due
to the late hour of the meeting.
Additional Business:
1) Alderman Besco thanked Laura Brown for coming to the Countryside meeting and
giving such a good presentation.
2) Alderman Munns brought up the fact that he has personally been called in regards to
the safety issue out by the Soccer field with kids running out into traffic. This will be
sent to the Public Safety CounciL
3) Alderwoman Burd stated that the owner of OJ's thought Laura Brown had done such
a good job.
4) Alderwoman Spears asked where the City stood on the emergency generator. Chief
Martin replied that it's been ordered. She also questioned what the weekend cost would
be. Chief Martin is still waiting for a reply, but will find out. It was explained to the
Committee that due to Weather events in other parts of the world, it could be a delay in
getting the correct workers back in the area to be able to install it. The office will only
have to be closed down for 3 days.
17
Page 18 of 18
5) Alderwoman Spears asked the Committee members if anyone knew if Pat Summerall
made TV. She also asked if everyone had paid there commitments. Tracy Pleckham
stated that the City had received funds today and will have two more coming by Friday,
with maybe one more. A list will be made to the Committee of all who participated.
6) Mayor Prochaska stated that IDNR is planning a meeting for the Citizens Committee
regarding the Dam on the 30th of September to go over where they are in the design
process here at City Hall.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:38 pm.
Minutes by: Sheila Teausaw
18
DATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1
LIME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
CD: AP441000.WOW •
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004 ' e3«�il40Low 461'*von
4Cs
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
JENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
AMOCO BP AMOCO OIL COMPANY
5902009801409 09/08/04 01 SEWER OP — AUG 9—SEPT 8 CHARGE 52-000-65-00-5812 09/28/04 1,988.98
GASOLINE
INVOICE TOTAL: 1,988.98
VENDOR TOTAL: 1,988.96
kROLAB ARRO LABORATORY, INC.
32818 08/13/04 01 WATER OP — SAMPLES 51-000-65-00-5822 00201947 09/28/04 310.00
WATER SAMPLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 310.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 310.00
ASOCTECH ASSOCIATED TECHNICAL SERVICES
14226 08/30/04 01 WATER OP — NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 51-000-65-00-5804 00202075 09/28/04 4,550.00
OPERATING SUPPLIES
02 LOCATOR ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 4,550.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 4,550.00
ATD ATD—AMERICAN CO.
751082 08/12/04 01 POLICE — OFFICE CHAIR 20-000-75-00-7001 00302680 09/28/04 332.95
EQUIPMENT
INVOICE TOTAL: 332.95
752428 08/20/04 01 POLICE — OFFICE CHAIR 20-000-75-00-7001 00302682 09/28/04 402.67
EQUIPMENT
INVOICE TOTAL: 402.67
753549 08/28/04 01 POLICE — CONFERENCE TABLE 20-000-75-00-7001 00302682 09/28/04 199.81
EQUIPMENT
INVOICE TOTAL: 199.81
VENDOR TOTAL: 935.43
P1
)ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2
'IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
:D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
TENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
STT AT&T
082404-4350 08/24/04 01 ADMIN - LONG DISTANCE 01-110-62-00-5436 09/28/04 176.28
TELEPHONE
02 POLICE - LONG DISTANCE 01-210-62-00-5436 176.28
TELEPHONE
03 WATER OP - LONG DISTANCE 51-000-62-00-5436 176.29
TELEPHONE
INVOICE TOTAL: 528.85
082504-2965 08/25/04 01 ADMIN - LONG DISTANCE 01-110-62-00-5436 09/28/04 17.93
TELEPHONE
02 POLICE - LONG DISTANCE 01-210-62-00-5436 17.93
TELEPHONE
03 WATER OP - LONG DISTANCE 51-000-62-00-5436 17.93
TELEPHONE
INVOICE TOTAL: 53.79
VENDOR TOTAL: 582.64
AURBLA AURORA BLACKTOP
091704EEI 09/17/04 01 STREETS-EST NO. 3 01-410-75-00-7099 09/28/04 86,913.62
BRISTOL RIDGE ROAD
INVOICE TOTAL: 86,913.62
14544 09/01/04 01 MFT - HOT MIX 15-000-75-00-7111 00202072 09/28/04 777.87
HOT PATCH
INVOICE TOTAL: 777.87
VENDOR TOTAL: 87,691.49
BCBS BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
091404 09/14/04 01 ADMIN - OCT 1 - NOV 1 01-110-50-00-5203 09/28/04 48,935.78
BENEFITS - HEALTH INSURANC
INVOICE TOTAL: 48,935.78
VENDOR TOTAL: 48,935.78
P2
ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3
IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
ENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
EHRD BEHRENS, DAVID
090704 09/07/04 01 ADMIN - DENTAL REIMBURSEMENT 01-110-50-00-5205 09/28/04 110.00
BENEFITS - DENTAL/VISION A
INVOICE TOTAL: 110.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 110.00
RENART BRENART EYE CLINIC
415292 08/06/04 01 POLICE - EXAM MCMAHON 01-210-62-00-5430 09/28/04 40.00
HEALTH SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 40.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 40.00
'AM CORRECTIVE ASPHALT MATERIALS
7749 08/31/04 01 STREETS-ASPHALT PAVEMENT 01-410-75-00-7100 09/28/04 32,690.66
STREET REHAB PROJECTS
02 SURFACE TREATMENT ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 32,690.66
VENDOR TOTAL: 32,690.66
'ENLIME CENTRAL LIMESTONE COMPANY, INC
1432 08/31/04 01 STREETS - GRAVEL 01-410-65-00-5817 00202071 09/28/04 195.48
GRAVEL
INVOICE TOTAL: 195.48
VENDOR TOTAL: 195.48
:ERNEKS CERNEKEE, SARAH
091404 09/14/04 01 ADMIN - VISION REIMBURSEMENT 01-110-50-00-5205 09/28/04 325.00
BENEFITS - DENTAL/VISION A
INVOICE TOTAL: 325.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 325.00
;INTAS CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY
P3
)ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4
'IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
CD: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
TENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
:INTAS CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY
0343237557 09/02/04 01 WATER OP - RESTOCK MED CABINET 51-000-75-00-7004 00202073 09/28/04 53.76
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
INVOICE TOTAL: 53.76
VENDOR TOTAL: 53.76
2LARKE CLARK ENVIRONMENTAL
279751 09/08/04 01 STREETS - TOUCH UP FOR 01-410-75-00-5418 09/28/04 200.00
MOSQUITO CONTROL
02 COMMUNITY FESTIVAL ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 200.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 200.00
2LEANSWP CLEAN SWEEP SWEEPING SERV.
959 08/24/04 01 STREETS-ASPHALT PAVEMENT 01-410-75-00-7100 09/28/04 495.00
STREET REHAB PROJECTS
02 SURFACE TREATMENT ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 495.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 495.00
2OMDIR COMMUNICATIONS DIRECT INC
64725 08/31/04 01 POLICE - GEAR DISPLAY, BULB 01-210-62-00-5409 00302705 09/28/04 320.50
MAINTENANCE - VEHICLES
02 ROTATOR, PARK KILL MOD. ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 320.50
VENDOR TOTAL: 320.50
CONED COMMONWEALTH EDISON
081904-1002 08/19/04 01 420 FAIRHAVEN 01-410-62-00-5435 00202077 09/28/04 506.07
ELECTRICITY
INVOICE TOTAL: 506.07
P4
)ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5
'IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
:D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
TENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
:OMED COMMONWEALTH EDISON
082004-1000 08/20/04 01 CITY 01-410-62-00-5435 00202077 09/28/04 1,441.79
ELECTRICITY
INVOICE TOTAL: 1,441.79
082604-1002 08/26/04 01 420 FAIRHAVEN 51-000-62-00-5435 00202077 09/28/04 8,201.70
ELECTRICITY
INVOICE TOTAL: 8,201.70
082704-1005 08/27/04 01 133 E HYDRAULIC 01-410-62-00-5435 00202077 09/28/04 133.09
ELECTRICITY
INVOICE TOTAL: 133.09
082704-2014 08/27/04 01 908 GAME FARM RD 01-410-62-00-5435 00202077 09/28/04 13.45
ELECTRICITY
INVOICE TOTAL: 13.45
082704-6002 09/14/04 01 CITY 01-410-62-00-5435 00202077 09/28/04 1,801.71
ELECTRICITY
INVOICE TOTAL: 1,801.71
082704-6018 08/27/04 01 908 GAMEFARM RD 01-410-62-00-5435 00202077 09/28/04 171.75
ELECTRICITY
INVOICE TOTAL: 171.75
082704-8036 08/27/04 01 1908 RAINTREE RD 01-410-62-00-5435 00202077 09/28/04 106.21
ELECTRICITY
INVOICE TOTAL: 106.21
083004-2114 09/14/04 01 7 COUNTRYSIDE 01-410-62-00-5435 00202077 09/28/04 190.87
ELECTRICITY
INVOICE TOTAL: 190.87
083004-4009 08/30/04 01 1 MCHUGH RD 01-410-62-00-5435 00202077 09/28/04 99.23
ELECTRICITY
INVOICE TOTAL: 99.23
P5
ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6
IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
ENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
OMED COMMONWEALTH EDISON
083004-6081 08/30/04 01 1 COUNTRYSIDE 01-410-62-00-5435 00202077 09/28/04 231.37
ELECTRICITY
INVOICE TOTAL: 231.37
083004-9019 08/30/04 01 4600 N BRIDGE 01-410-62-00-5435 00202077 09/28/04 29.76
ELECTRICITY
INVOICE TOTAL: 29.76
VENDOR TOTAL: 12,927.00
ONDESGN CONSERVATION DESIGN FORUM
0003349 09/07/04 01 BLDG/ZONE - WETLAND PORTECTION 01-220-62-00-5401 09/28/04 1,687.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 1,687.50
0003357 09/07/04 01 BLDG/ZONE-STORM WATER CONSULT 01-220-62-00-5401 09/28/04 93.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 93.75
VENDOR TOTAL: 1,781.25
=PETTY CITY OF YORKVILLE PETTY CASH
091504CTY 09/15/04 01 WATER OP-WATER LIEN 51-000-65-00-5804 09/28/04 21.00
OPERATING SUPPLIES
02 STREETS-8 BALES OF HAY 01-410-62-00-5420 24.00
MAINTENANCE-STORM SEWER
03 WATER OP-WATER LIEN 51-000-65-00-5804 21.00
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 66.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 66.00
)HUSE DHUSE, ERIC
091604 09/16/04 01 WATER OP - TRANSPORTATION & 51-000-64-00-5605 09/28/04 765.54
TRAVEL EXPENSES
P6
kTE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7
IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
3: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
ZNDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
HUSE DHUSE, ERIC
091604 09/16/04 02 MEALS TO APWA NATL. CONE ** COMMENT ** 09/28/04
INVOICE TOTAL: 765.54
VENDOR TOTAL: 765.54
IRT DIRT, INC.
2059 08/20/04 01 STREETS - PULVERIZED MATERIAL 01-410-65-00-5804 00201999 09/28/04 132.00
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 132.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 132.00
REYER DREYER MEDICAL CLINIC
12790241 08/06/04 01 POLICE - MCMAHON 01-210-62-00-5430 00302709 09/28/04 190.00
HEALTH SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 190.00
12790242 08/06/04 01 POLICE - MCMAHON 01-210-62-00-5430 00302709 09/28/04 10.00
HEALTH SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 10.00
12790243 08/06/04 01 POLICE - MCMAHON 01-210-62-00-5430 00302709 09/28/04 70.00
HEALTH SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 70.00
12790244 08/06/04 01 POLICE - MCMAHON 01-210-62-00-5430 00302709 09/28/04 72.00
HEALTH SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 72.00
12790245 08/04/04 01 POLICE - OSMUNDSON 01-210-62-00-5430 00302709 09/28/04 190.00
HEALTH SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 190.00
12790246 08/04/04 01 POLICE - BETTENHAUSEN 01-210-62-00-5430 00302709 09/28/04 10.00
HEALTH SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 10.00
P7
)ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8
'IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
:D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
7ENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
)REYER DREYER MEDICAL CLINIC
12790247 08/04/04 01 POLICE - BETTENHAUSEN 01-210-62-00-5430 00302709 09/28/04 70.00
HEALTH SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 70.00
12790248 08/04/04 01 POLICE - BETTENHAUSEN 01-210-62-00-5430 00302709 09/28/04 72.00
HEALTH SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 72.00
12857750 08/27/04 01 POLICE - SMUDZINSKI 01-210-62-00-5430 00302709 09/28/04 190.00
HEALTH SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 190.00
12857751 08/27/04 01 POLICE - SMUDZINSKI 01-210-62-00-5430 00302709 09/28/04 10.00
HEALTH SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 10.00
12857752 08/27/04 01 POLICE - SMUDZINSKI 01-210-62-00-5430 00302709 09/28/04 70.00
HEALTH SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 70.00
12857753 08/27/04 01 POLICE - SMUDZINSKI 01-210-62-00-5430 00302709 09/28/04 72.00
HEALTH SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 72.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 1,026.00
E2SERV E2 SERVICES
1959 08/22/04 01 ADMIN - LIBRARY FIREWALL 01-110-62-00-5411 09/28/04 237.50
MAINTENANCE - COMPUTERS
INVOICE TOTAL: 237.50
VENDOR TOTAL: 237.50
EASYLINK EASYLINK SERVICES CORP.
06831130409 08/31/04 01 POLICE - EFAX CHARGES 01-210-65-00-5804 09/28/04 3.62
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 3.82
VENDOR TOTAL: 3.82
P8
>ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9
'IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
:LAN ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES
090204 09/02/04 01 PARK & REC-SOCCER BALLS 01-000-13-00-1372 00102175 09/28/04 195.77
A/R - OTHER
02 ADMIN-KENDALL COUNTY MEETING 01-110-64-00-5605 19.67
TRAVEL/MEALS/LODGING
03 WITH MAYOR-MEALS ** COMMENT **
04 ADMIN-KENDALL COUNTY MEETING 01-110-64-00-5605 151.59
TRAVEL/MEALS/LODGING
05 WITH MAYOR-MEALS ** COMMENT **
06 POLICE-AOL 01-210-62-00-5436 24.95
TELEPHONE
07 ADMIN-TONY IML LEADERSHIP 01-110-64-00-5605 197.58
TRAVEL/MEALS/LODGING
08 COURSE ** COMMENT **
09 WATER OP-AOL 51-000-62-00-5436 23.90
TELEPHONE
10 PARK & REC-PRESCHOOL-TABLES 01-000-13-00-1372 374.48
A/R - OTHER
11 ADMIN-3 FILE CABINETS-CLERKS 01-110-75-00-7003 1,485.00
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
12 ADMIN-IL PK & REC ASSOC 01-110-65-00-5802 42.50
OFFICE SUPPLIES
13 POLICE-IL PK & REC ASSOC 01-210-65-00-5802 42.50
OFFICE SUPPLIES
14 WATER OP-IL PK & REC ASSOC 51-000-65-00-5804 42.50
OPERATING SUPPLIES
15 PARK & REC-IL PK & REC ASSOC 01-000-13-00-1372 42.50
A/R - OTHER
16 P&R-CONES & FRISBEE GOLF/SATOR 01-000-13-00-1372 60.37
A/R - OTHER
17 PARK & REC-STACKING CHAIRS 01-000-13-00-1372 549.40
A/R - OTHER
18 REC - AOL 01-000-13-00-1372 23.90
A/R - OTHER
19 PARK & REC-WALMART/PRESCHOOL 01-000-13-00-1372 199.20
A/R - OTHER
P9
)ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10
'IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
:D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
/ENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
MAN ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES
090204 09/02/04 20 P&R-SLEEZER TRAVEL-CONFERENCE 01-000-13-00-1372 00102175 09/28/04 446.75
A/R - OTHER
21 P&R-SLEEZER HOTEL-TRAVEL 01-000-13-00-1372 538.60
A/R - OTHER
22 ADMIN-MICROSOFT ACCESS CLASS 01-110-64-00-5604 399.00
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
23 PARK & REC-PRESCHOOL-CHAIRS 01-000-13-00-1372 143.45
A/R - OTHER
24 WATER OP-DHUSE APWA CONFERENCE 51-000-64-00-5605 148.19
TRAVEL EXPENSES
25 ADMIN-AOL 01-110-62-00-5436 23.90
TELEPHONE
26 PARK-AOL 01-000-13-00-1372 23.90
A/R - OTHER
27 PARK & REC-MEDICAL SUPPLIES 01-000-13-00-1372 30.92
A/R - OTHER
28 ADMIN-BOOKS 01-110-65-00-5804 44.50
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 5,275.02
VENDOR TOTAL: 5,275.02
ELITE ELITE PRINTERS
1003 09/10/04 01 POLICE - PURCHASE ORDER FORMS 01-210-65-00-5809 09/28/04 425.00
PRINTING & COPYING
INVOICE TOTAL: 425.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 425.00
FIRST FIRST PLACE RENTAL
114388 08/17/04 01 STREETS - ADAPTER 01-410-62-00-5408 00202000 09/28/04 7.12
MAINTENANCE-EQUIPMENT
INVOICE TOTAL: 7.12
114670 08/30/04 01 STREETS - PISTON & RINGS 01-410-62-00-5408 00202000 09/28/04 96.14
MAINTENANCE-EQUIPMENT
INVOICE TOTAL: 96.14
P 1 0
fTE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11
:ME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
): AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
[NVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
3NDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
EAST FIRST PLACE RENTAL
L14738 08/26/04 01 WATER OP - OIL CAP, SPADES 51-000-65-00-5815 00201948 09/28/04 86.00
HAND TOOLS
INVOICE TOTAL: 86.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 189.26
DXRIDGE FOX RIDGE STONE
3137 08/31/04 01 WATER OP - AUG STONE BALANCE 51-000-65-00-5817 00202070 09/28/04 72.91
GRAVEL
INVOICE TOTAL: 72.91
VENDOR TOTAL: 72.91
VTA FOX VALLEY TROPHY & AWARDS
18573 07/19/04 01 POLICE - PLAQUES 01-210-65-00-5804 00302708 09/28/04 140.00
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 140.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 140.00
LOBEQ GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY
84104297 08/23/04 01 SEWER OP - 2 FLAT FILE CABINET 52-000-75-00-7003 00202068 09/28/04 1,893.00
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
INVOICE TOTAL: 1,893.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 1,893.00
ROESCHB GROESCH, BARRY
081804 08/18/04 01 ADMIN - DENTAL REIMBURSEMENT 01-110-50-00-5205 09/28/04 59.00
BENEFITS - DENTAL/VISION A
INVOICE TOTAL: 59.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 59.00
ENNE VERNE HENNE CONSTR. &
P11
ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12
IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
ENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
ENNE VERNE HENNE CONSTR. &
24349 08/12/04 01 STREETS - RT. 47 & FOX ST. 01-410-62-00-5414 09/28/04 34.20
MAINTENANCE-TRAFFIC SIGNAL
INVOICE TOTAL: 34.20
24351 08/12/04 01 STREETS - E. BARBERRY & WALSH 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 152.89
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 152.89
24352 08/12/04 01 STREETS - 491 SPICE CT. 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 111.28
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 111.28
24392 08/12/04 01 STREETS - 586 HEARTLAND 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 79.39
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 79.39
24393 08/12/04 01 STREETS - 1436 CHESTNUT LANE 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 79.39
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 79.39
24394 08/12/04 01 STREETS - BADGER 1ST POLE S. 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 66.89
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 66.89
24395 08/12/04 01 STREETS - YELLOWSTONE & ALLEND 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 37.50
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 37.50
24396 08/12/04 01 STREETS - REPAIR BEAVER/DEER 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 37.50
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 37.50
24397 08/12/04 01 STREETS - DOVER & FAIRHAVEN 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 231.17
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 231.17
P12
SATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13
'IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
ENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
.ENNE VERNE HENNE CONSTR. &
24398 08/12/04 01 STREETS - 538 W. BARBERRY 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 256.17
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 256.17
24404 08/26/04 01 STREETS - DEER & RT. 126 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 75.28
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 75.28
24405 08/26/04 01 STREETS - 965 HEARTLAND DR. 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 75.28
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 75.28
24406 08/26/04 01 STREETS - 89 CROOKED CREEK DR. 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 169.09
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 169.09
24407 08/26/04 01 STREETS- 1 POLE PAST FREEMONT 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 231.17
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 231.17
24417 08/26/04 01 STREETS - PARK AT COUNTRY HILL 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 180.62
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
02 OFF RT. 71 ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 180.62
24418 08/26/04 01 STREETS - 201 SOMONAUK ST. 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 92.42
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 92.42
24419 08/26/04 01 STREETS - 47 & CENTER E CORNER 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 54.28
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 54.28
24420 08/26/04 01 STREETS - SW RT. 34 & 47 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 71.00
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 71.00
P13
)ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14
'IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
[ENNE VERNE HENNE CONSTR. &
24421 08/26/04 01 STREETS - RT. 47 & COUNTRYSIDE 01-410-62-00-5415 00201996 09/28/04 50.00
MAINTENANCE-STREET LIGHTS
02 PARKWAY NE CORNER ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 2,085.52
IOLSEPT HOLLEY SEPTIC SERVICE
1990 08/31/04 01 SEWER OP - STAND BY FOR REPAIR 52-000-62-00-5422 00202045 09/28/04 350.00
LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE
02 AT MAIN ST. LIFT STATION ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 350.00
1993 08/31/04 01 SEWER OP - PUMP @ GAWN LN. 52-000-62-00-5422 00202045 09/28/04 150.00
LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE
INVOICE TOTAL: 150.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 500.00
CCCI INTERNATIONAL CODES
20040913 09/07/04 01 ADMIN - BLDG PERMITS 01-110-61-00-5314 09/28/04 53,767.75
BUILDING INSPECTIONS
INVOICE TOTAL: 53,767.75
20040914 09/07/04 01 ARO - ZONING/PLAN COORDINATOR 01-000-13-00-1372 09/28/04 375.00
A/R - OTHER
INVOICE TOTAL: 375.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 54,142.75
CCE ICE MOUNTAIN
04H8105151347 08/31/04 01 POLICE - WATER 01-210-65-00-5804 09/28/04 95.50
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 95.50
VENDOR TOTAL: 95.50
•
P14
ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15
IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
ENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
LCCMA ILLINOIS CITY/COUNTY
091504 09/15/04 01 ADMIN - BART NIU INTERN FEE 01-110-64-00-5600 09/28/04 20.00
DUES
INVOICE TOTAL: 20.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 20.00
LTACTIC ILLINOIS TACTICAL OFFICERS
091504-DELANEY 09/17/04 01 POLICE - REG FOR ITOA CONF. 01-210-64-00-5604 00302707 09/28/04 225.00
TRAINING & CONFERENCE
INVOICE TOTAL: 225.00
091504-HART 09/15/04 01 POLICE - REG FOR ITOA CONF. 01-210-64-00-5604 00302707 09/28/04 225.00
TRAINING & CONFERENCE
INVOICE TOTAL: 225.00
091504-SCHWARTZ 09/16/04 01 POLICE - REG FOR ITOA CONF 01-210-64-00-5604 00302707 09/28/04 225.00
TRAINING & CONFERENCE
INVOICE TOTAL: 225.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 675.00
'EWEL JEWEL-OSCO
090104PD 09/01/04 01 POLICE - DOG FOOD, SUPPLIES 01-210-65-00-5804 09/28/04 55.18
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 55.18
VENDOR TOTAL: 55.18
TNPR KENDALL PRINTING
12407 08/27/04 01 ADMIN - BUSINESS CARDS SPEARS 01-110-65-00-5809 09/28/04 39.50
PRINTING & COPYING
INVOICE TOTAL: 39.50
12434 09/03/04 01 ADMIN - BUSINESS CARDS BART 01-110-65-00-5809 09/28/04 39.50
PRINTING & COPYING
INVOICE TOTAL: 39.50
VENDOR TOTAL: 79.00
P15
TATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16
'IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
:OPY KOPY KAT COPIER
98724 09/02/04 01 ADMIN - PAPER 01-110-65-00-5802 00102181 09/28/04 333.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 333.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 333.00
CRAMD KRAMER, DANIEL
080204DC 08/02/04 01 STREETS - IN TOWN ROAD PROGRAM 01-410-75-00-7101 09/28/04 1,200.00
IN TOWN ROAD PROGRAM
02 DEBT CERT - ATTORNEY FEES ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 1,200.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 1,200.00
:,AWSON LAWSON PRODUCTS
2305887 08/10/04 01 STREETS - HEX NUT 01-410-65-00-5804 00202003 09/28/04 34.91
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 34.91
VENDOR TOTAL: 34.91
4CDOWEL MCDOWELL TRUCK PARTS, INC.
117594 08/05/04 01 STREETS - STAR STROBE HEAD 01-410-62-00-5409 00201998 09/28/04 165.76
MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 165.76
VENDOR TOTAL: 165.76
1EADE MEADE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
616713 08/29/04 01 STREETS - REPAIR 47 & KENNEDY 01-410-62-00-5414 00202074 09/28/04 552.38
MAINTENANCE-TRAFFIC SIGNAL
INVOICE TOTAL: 552.38
VENDOR TOTAL: 552.38
NIENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE
P16
I ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17
IME: 12:48:12 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE ## INVOICE ITEM
ENDOR # DATE. # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
ENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE
20977 08/11/04 01 STREETS - UTILITY BLADE, 9PC 01-410-65-00-5804 09/28/04 14.46
OPERATING SUPPLIES
02 HEX KEY SET,8PC HEX SET & ** COMMENT **
03 10" ADJUSTABLE WRENCH ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 14.46
21005 08/11/04 01 WATER OP - BUNGI CORDS 51-000-65-00-5804 09/28/04 4.28
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 4.28
22176 08/17/04 01 WATER OP - BLEACH 51-000-65-00-5804 09/28/04 10.72
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 10.72
22313 08/18/04 01 WATER OP - NEEDLE VALVE, 51-000-65-00-5804 09/28/04 13.57
OPERATING SUPPLIES
02 COMPRESSION NUT & SLEEVE ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 13.57
22508 08/19/04 01 STREETS - CEMENT 01-410-65-00-5804 09/28/04 9.98
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 9.98
23585 08/24/04 01 STREETS - PLATED ALLTHREAD 01-410-65-00-5804 09/28/04 1.08
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 1.08
23897 08/26/04 01 STREETS - 36" INSULATED WAND 01-410-65-00-5804 09/28/04 21.20
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 21.20
23944 08/26/04 01 STREETS - HEX KEY SET 01-410-65-00-5804 09/28/04 9.98
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 9.98
P17
DATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18
LIME: 12:48:13 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
/ENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
9ENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE
24028 08/27/04 01 SEWER OP-LUMBER 52-000-65-00-5804 09/28/04 57.18
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 57.18
24980 09/14/04 01 SEWER OP-PAPER TOWELS 52-000-65-00-5804 09/28/04 14.70
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 14.70
26332 09/07/04 01 POLICE - KEY 01-210-65-00-5804 09/28/04 0.96
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 0.96
26535 09/08/04 01 POLICE - 60 & 20 LB HANGERS, 01-210-65-00-5804 09/28/04 68.47
OPERATING SUPPLIES
02 QTY 3-65W BR 30-2PK,QTY 4-60W ** COMMENT **
03 G25 GLOBES 3PK,QTY 1-65W 30- ** COMMENT **
04 2 PK, CLOCK, 6 OUTLET STRIP, ** COMMENT **
05 4 PK 9V & 4 PK AA BATTERIES ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 68.47
26576 09/08/04 01 ADMIN - WET/DRY VAC 01-110-65-00-5804 09/28/04 46.99
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 46.99
VENDOR TOTAL: 273.57
4IDAM MID AMERICAN WATER
13356A 08/06/04 01 WATER OP - HYDRANT 51-000-75-00-7507 00201949 09/28/04 1,350.00
HYDRANT REPLACEMENT
INVOICE TOTAL: 1,350.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 1,350.00
9ATLWTR NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC.
1401290 06/22/04 01 WATER OP - METERS 51-000-75-00-7508 00201951 09/28/04 2,090.64
METERS & PARTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 2,090.64
P18
ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19
IME: 12:48:13 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
ENDOR ## DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
ATLWTR NATIONAL WATERWORKS, INC.
1527959 08/18/04 01 WATER OP - METERS 51-000-75-00-7508 00201951 09/28/04 3,212.00
METERS & PARTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 3,212.00
1556365 08/07/04 01 WATER OP - METERS 51-000-75-00-7508 00201951 09/28/04 2,256.00
METERS & PARTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 2,256.00
1573948 08/19/04 01 WATER OP - METERS 51-000-75-00-7508 00201951 09/28/04 2,328.00
METERS & PARTS
INVOICE TOTAL: 2,328.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 9,886.64
(ICOR NICOR GAS
090104-5591 09/03/04 01 ADMIN-AUG CHARGES 01-110-78-00-9002 09/28/04 25.00
NICOR GAS
INVOICE TOTAL: 25.00
090904-0360 09/09/04 01 ADMIN - THRU SEPT 9 01-110-78-00-9002 09/28/04 83.44
NICOR GAS
INVOICE TOTAL: 83.44
090904-1910 09/09/04 01 ADMIN - AUG 11-SEPT 9 01-110-78-00-9002 09/28/04 721.40
NICOR GAS
INVOICE TOTAL: 721.40
VENDOR TOTAL: 829.84
TORWEGIA NORWEGIAN IMPLEMENT CO.
97967 08/24/04 01 WATER OP - BOX BLADES 51-000-65-00-5804 00201946 09/28/04 233.82
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 233.82
VENDOR TOTAL: 233.82
P19
ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20
IME: 12:48:13 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
ENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
TFWORK OFFICE WORKS
059727I 09/09/04 01 POLICE-QTY1-24 PK-11X8 BINDERS 01-210-65-00-5802 00302706 09/28/04 186.24
OFFICE SUPPLIES
02 QTY 2-24PK INDEX BINDERS ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 186.24
059780 09/14/04 01 POLICE - 1 SPRAY OZIUM 01-210-65-00-5804 09/28/04 6.14
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 6.14
060125 09/16/04 01 ENG - 1 DZ LEGAL PADS 01-150-65-00-5802 09/28/04 4.99
OFFICE SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 4.99
VENDOR TOTAL: 197.37
)MALLEY O'MALLEY WELDING & FABRICATING
10375 08/13/04 01 STREETS - MATERIALS 01-410-62-00-5409 00201997 09/28/04 170.00
MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 170.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 170.00
?ATTEN PATTEN INDUSTRIES, INC.
P53C0075869 08/10/04 01 WATER OP - BEARING KITS 51-000-62-00-5408 00201943 09/28/04 67.52
MAINTENANCE-EQUIPMENT
INVOICE TOTAL: 67.52
VENDOR TOTAL: 67.52
?OSTNET POSTNET IL 124
14893 09/01/04 01 ADMIN - S. PRV STATION PRINTS 01-150-65-00-5809 09/28/04 10.50
PRINTING & COPYING
INVOICE TOTAL: 10.50
VENDOR TOTAL: 10.50
P20
ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21
:ME: 12:48:13 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
): AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
3NDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
)ULOS POULOS INC
)90704EEI 09/07/04 01 WATER IMPROV-EST NO. 5 41-000-61-00-5408 09/28/04 20,354.53
CENTRAL ZONE - CONTRACT C
02 CONTRACT C.7 WELL NO.7 WELL ** COMMENT **
03 HOUSE & TREATMENT FACILITY ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 20,354.53
VENDOR TOTAL: 20,354.53
RELUBE PRECISION LUBE
212774 08/03/04 01 POLICE - OIL CHANGE M132940 01-210-62-00-5409 00302704 09/28/04 20.00
MAINTENANCE - VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 20.00
213047 08/10/04 01 ENG - OIL CHANGE LUMINA 01-150-62-00-5409 09/28/04 20.00
MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 20.00
213067 08/17/04 01 ENG - OIL CHANGE M145022 01-150-62-00-5409 09/28/04 21.60
MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 21.60
213390 08/18/04 01 POLICE - OIL CHANGE m140155 01-210-62-00-5409 00302704 09/28/04 20.00
MAINTENANCE - VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 20.00
213454 08/19/04 01 POLICE - OIL CHANGE M119155 01-210-62-00-5409 00302704 09/28/04 20.00
MAINTENANCE - VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 20.00
213604 08/23/04 01 POLICE - OIL CHANGE M137636 01-210-62-00-5409 00302704 09/28/04 20.00
MAINTENANCE - VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 20.00
213676 08/25/04 01 POLICE - OIL CHANGE M129601 01-210-62-00-5409 00302704 09/28/04 20.00
MAINTENANCE - VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 20.00
P21
)ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22
'IME: 12:48:13 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
:D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
'RELUBE PRECISION LUBE
213884 08/30/04 01 POLICE - OIL CHANGE M132941 01-210-62-00-5409 00302704 09/28/04 20.00
MAINTENANCE - VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 20.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 161.60
?ROAUTO PRO AUTO GLASS
101267 08/23/04 01 WATER OP - FRONT WINSHEILD 51-000-65-00-5804 00201945 09/28/04 233.00
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 233.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 233.00
ZUILL QUILL CORPORATION
1741719 08/30/04 01 ADMIN - BUSINESS CARD FOR WEB 01-110-65-00-5802 00102184 09/28/04 7.19
OFFICE SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 7.19
1823687 09/01/04 01 ADMIN - 2 PKGS AA BATTERIES, 01-110-65-00-5802 00102182 09/28/04 68.09
OFFICE SUPPLIES
03 2 DEFLECTO MAGNETIC POCKET, ** COMMENT **
04 12 BXS BINDER CLIPS, 1 BX ** COMMENT **
05 INTEROFFICE ENVELOPES ** COMMENT **
06 WATER OP-8 PKGS INSERT TABS, 51-000-65-00-5804 124.60
OPERATING SUPPLIES
07 1 BX HOLE REINFORCEMENTS, ** COMMENT **
08 1 DZ POST IT NOTE PADS, ** COMMENT **
09 4 THERMAL PRINT CARTRIDGES, ** COMMENT **
10 6 CLIPBOARDS & 3DZ PENCILS ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 192.69
1968821 09/09/04 01 BLDG/ZONE - WASTEBASKETS/SUPPL 01-220-65-00-5804 09/28/04 51.58
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 51.58
P22
ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 23
IME: 12:48:13 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
ENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
QUILL QUILL CORPORATION
1969139 09/09/04 01 ADMIN - TONER & SUPPLIES 01-110-65-00-5802 00102184 09/28/04 123.98
OFFICE SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 123.98
1970227 09/09/04 01 BLDG/ZONE - BUS CARD HOLDERS 01-220-65-00-5804 00102184 09/28/04 12.58
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 12.58
1993460 09/10/04 01 BLDG/ZONE - BUS CARD HOLDERS 01-220-65-00-5804 00102184 09/28/04 12.58
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 12.58
286440CM 09/10/04 01 BLDG/ZONE - CREDIT BROKEN ITEM 01-220-65-00-5804 09/28/04 -12.58
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: -12.58
VENDOR TOTAL: 388.02
2ATOSJ RATOS, JAMES
091604 09/16/04 01 ADMIN - SALES TAX REBATE 01-110-78-00-9003 09/28/04 2,544.39
SALES TAX REBATE
INVOICE TOTAL: 2,544.39
VENDOR TOTAL: 2,544.39
2EIMELEC RIEMENSCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INC
9109 08/20/04 01 WATER OP - WELL #3 REPAIR 51-000-65-00-5804 00201944 09/28/04 2,388.98
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 2,388.98
VENDOR TOTAL: 2,388.98
ZELIABLE RELIABLE COMPUTER SERVICES
2998 08/24/04 01 SEWER OP - REPAIRS, VIDEO CARD 52-000-75-00-7002 00202076 09/28/04 329.90
COMPUTER EQUIP & SOFTWARE
INVOICE TOTAL: 329.90
VENDOR TOTAL: 329.90
P23
DATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 24
CIME: 12:48:13 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
ED: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
JENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
2USH RUSH-COPLEY MEDICAL CENTER
2002118475 04/18/04 01 ADMIN-MEDICAL SERVICE 01-110-78-00-9004 09/28/04 36.00
MISCELLANEOUS
02 BETHANY JOHNSON ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 36.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 36.00
3ALISM SAILSBURY, MARGARET
5852-27 08/29/04 01 WATER OP - CLEANING ON AGU 29 51-000-62-00-5401 09/28/04 50.00
CONTRACUAL SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00
5652-28 09/14/04 01 WATER OP - CLEANING ON SEPT 4 51-000-62-00-5401 09/28/04 50.00
CONTRACUAL SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 100.00
SBC SBC
630553114108 08/25/04 01 POLICE DEPT. FAX JUL 26-AUG 25 01-210-62-00-5436 09/28/04 45.22
TELEPHONE
INVOICE TOTAL: 45.22
630553121008 08/25/04 01 LIFT STATION JUL 26-AUG 25 51-000-62-00-5436 09/28/04 21.52
TELEPHONE
INVOICE TOTAL: 21.52
630553170308 08/25/04 01 WATER OP - JUL 26-AUG 25 51-000-62-00-5436 09/28/04 19.97
TELEPHONE
INVOICE TOTAL: 19.97
630553434908 08/25/04 01 CITY HALL JUL 26-AUG 25 01-110-62-00-5436 09/28/04 908.71
TELEPHONE
02 CITY HALL JUL 26-AUG 25 01-210-62-00-5436 908.71
TELEPHONE
P24
SATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 25
IME: 12:48:13 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
'ENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
SBC SBC
630553434908 08/25/04 03 CITY HALL JUL 26-AUG 25 51-000-62-00-5436 09/28/04 908.71
TELEPHONE
INVOICE TOTAL: 2,726.13
630553542608 08/25/04 01 PUMP HOUSE JUL 26-AUG 25 51-000-62-00-5436 09/28/04 70.50
TELEPHONE
INVOICE TOTAL: 70.50
630553652208 08/25/04 01 POLICE DEPT JUL 26-AUG 25 01-210-62-00-5436 09/28/04 19.19
TELEPHONE
INVOICE TOTAL: 19.19
630553757508 08/25/04 01 CITY HALL FAX JUL 26-AUG 25 01-110-62-00-5436 09/28/04 99.93
TELEPHONE
INVOICE TOTAL: 99.93
630553901608 08/25/04 01 POLICE DEPT JUL 26-AUG 25 01-210-62-00-5436 09/28/04 57.53
TELEPHONE
INVOICE TOTAL: 57.53
630882841208 08/25/04 01 WATER OP - JUL 26-AUG 25 51-000-62-00-5436 09/28/04 23.97
TELEPHONE
INVOICE TOTAL: 23.97
VENDOR TOTAL: 3,083.96
SERVMASC SERVICEMASTER COMMERCIAL
124109 09/15/04 01 ADMIN - MONTHLY CHARGES 01-110-62-00-5406 09/28/04 550.00
OFFICE CLEANING
INVOICE TOTAL: 550.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 550.00
SIBENG SIBENALLER, GREGORY
082404 08/24/04 01 ADMIN - VISION REIMBURSEMENT 01-110-50-00-5205 09/28/04 666.95
BENEFITS - DENTAL/VISION A
INVOICE TOTAL: 666.95
VENDOR TOTAL: 666.95
P25
ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 26
IME: 12:48:13 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
D: AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
ENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
MITH SMITH ENGINEERING
323334 07/23/04 01 MFT - GAME FARM/SOMONAUK RD 15-000-75-00-7107 09/28/04 21,769.50
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING
INVOICE TOTAL: 21,769.50
VENDOR TOTAL: 21,769.50
ITEVENS STEVEN'S SILKSCREENING
080204 08/02/04 01 STREETS - 10 TSHIRTS 01-410-62-00-5421 00202002 09/28/04 140.00
WEARING APPAREL
INVOICE TOTAL: 140.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 140.00
'APCO TRAFFIC & PARKING CONTROL INC
204515 08/25/04 02 WATER OP - SAFETY VESTS 51-000-75-00-7004 00202069 09/28/04 103.40
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
INVOICE TOTAL: 103.40
204594 08/25/04 01 MFT - YIELD & AHEAD SIGNS 15-000-75-00-7007 00202069 09/28/04 231.88
SIGNS
INVOICE TOTAL: 231.88
204623 08/25/04 01 MFT - HARDWARE 15-000-75-00-7007 00202069 09/28/04 87.76
SIGNS
INVOICE TOTAL: 87.76
VENDOR TOTAL: 423.04
CEAUSAWS SHEILA TEAUSAW
082304PW 08/23/04 01 ADMIN - PUBLIC WORKS MINUTES 01-110-62-00-5401 09/28/04 55.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 55.00
082604PS 08/26/04 01 ADMIN - PUBLIC SAFETY MINUTES 01-110-62-00-5401 09/28/04 65.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 65.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 120.00
P26
FE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 27
4E: 12:48:13 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
. AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
EVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
NDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
SIL UPS
0004296X2364 09/04/04 01 WATER OP - 2 PACKAGES 51-000-65-00-5808 09/28/04 28.40
POSTAGE & SHIPPING
INVOICE TOTAL: 28.40
0004296X2374 09/11/04 01 WATER OP-2 PACKAGES 51-000-65-00-5808 09/28/04 53.65
POSTAGE & SHIPPING
INVOICE TOTAL: 53.65
VENDOR TOTAL: 82.05
STE WASTE MANAGEMENT
164566-2011-3 09/01/04 01 HEALTH & SANITATION 01-540-62-00-5442 09/28/04 40,843.78
GARBAGE SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 40,843.78
VENDOR TOTAL: 40,843.78
JUBONSE WAUBONSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
!005-022 09/01/04 01 ADMIN-DEALING WITH DIFFICULT 01-110-64-00-5604 00102183 09/28/04 900.00
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
02 SITUATIONS CLASS ** COMMENT **
INVOICE TOTAL: 900.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 900.00
;BLINX WEBLINX INCORPORATED
L969 09/03/04 01 ADMIN - SEPT WEBSITE 01-110-62-00-5401 09/28/04 100.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 100.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 100.00
HOLTIRE WHOLESALE TIRE
105479 09/09/04 01 POLICE - BATTERY ADJUSTMENT 01-210-62-00-5409 09/28/04 11.99
MAINTENANCE - VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 11.99
P27
1TE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 28
CME: 12:48:13 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
): AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
ENVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
3NDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
IOLTIRE WHOLESALE TIRE
105536 09/14/04 01 POLICE - BATTERY ADJUSTMENT 01-210-62-00-5409 09/28/04 8.00
MAINTENANCE - VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 8.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 19.99
IREWIZ WIRE WIZARD OF ILLINOIS, INC
R 3861 08/25/04 01 WATER OP - BURGLAR ALARM MONT. 51-000-65-00-5804 09/28/04 69.00
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 69.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 69.00
OODJ WOODRICK, JENNIFER
090304 09/03/04 01 ENG - CLASSES AT WCC 01-150-64-00-5604 09/28/04 369.00
TRAINING & CONFERENCES
INVOICE TOTAL: 369.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 369.00
TRPRD WATER PRODUCTS, INC.
0171787 08/06/04 01 WATER OP - COMBO KEY 51-000-65-00-5804 00201950 09/28/04 85.95
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 85.95
0171788 08/06/04 01 WATER OP - CURB BOX KEY 51-000-65-00-5804 00020195 09/28/04 45.00
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 45.00
0171874 08/10/04 01 WATER OP - HYDRANT EXTENSION 51-000-65-00-5804 00020195 09/28/04 380.00
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 380.00
0171875 08/10/04 01 WATER OP - CURB STOP /COUPLING 51-000-65-00-5804 00020195 09/28/04 343.52
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 343.52
P28
ATE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 29
:ME: 12:48:13 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
): AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
ENVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
3NDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
CRPRD WATER PRODUCTS, INC.
)172353 08/24/04 01 SEWER OP - SEWER BALL PLUG 52-000-62-00-5419 00202050 09/28/04 733.00
MAINTENANCE-SANITARY SEWER
INVOICE TOTAL: 733.00
0172769 09/09/04 01 SEWER OP - RETURNING BALL PLUG 52-000-62-00-5419 00202050 09/28/04 -613.00
MAINTENANCE-SANITARY SEWER
INVOICE TOTAL: -613.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 974.47
DPDPET YORKVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
090304 09/14/04 01 POLICE - CUTTING STRIP/BLADE 01-210-65-00-5802 09/28/04 14.70
OFFICE SUPPLIES
02 POLICE - SOLICITOR BACKGROUND 01-210-65-00-5802 16.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
03 POLICE - BACKGROUND CHECK 01-210-65-00-5802 64.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
04 PARK & RECREATION ** COMMENT **
05 POLICE - LUNCH 203 & 215 01-210-64-00-5605 10.83
TRAVEL EXPENSES
06 POLICE - LIQUOR LICENSE 01-210-65-00-5804 7.50
OPERATING SUPPLIES
07 COMPLIANCE CHECK ** COMMENT **
08 POLICE - COMPLIANCE CHK DINNER 01-210-64-00-5605 26.43
TRAVEL EXPENSES
09 POLICE - GET WELL HART/HAYES 01-210-65-00-5804 138.14
OPERATING SUPPLIES
10 POLICE - MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 01-210-64-00-5605 29.17
TRAVEL EXPENSES
11 POLICE - TOTAL STATION TRAININ 01-210-64-00-5605 65.00
TRAVEL EXPENSES
12 POLICE - PELICAN CASE 01-210-65-00-5804 97.95
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 469.72
VENDOR TOTAL: 469.72
P29
TE: 09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 30
ME: 12:48:13 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
. AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
NVOICE # INVOICE ITEM
NDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
POST YORKVILLE POSTMASTER
91604 09/14/04 01 WATER OP - STAMPS FOR PENALTY 51-000-65-00-5808 09/28/04 92.00
POSTAGE & SHIPPING
INVOICE TOTAL: 92.00
VENDOR TOTAL: 92.00
)RKACE YORKVILLE ACE & RADIO SHACK
)78749 08/24/04 01 WATER OP - STAPLE 51-000-65-00-5804 09/28/04 10.47
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 10.47
VENDOR TOTAL: 10.47
)UNGM YOUNG, MARLYS
)72004COW 08/28/04 01 ADMIN - RECORDING MINUTES COW 01-110-62-00-5401 09/28/04 131.25
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 131.25
)81204ADMIN 09/03/04 01 ADMIN-ADMIN COMMITTEE MINUTES 01-110-62-00-5401 09/28/04 93.75
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
INVOICE TOTAL: 93.75
VENDOR TOTAL: 225.00
2KAUT0 YORKVILLE AUTO PARTS
083104CM 08/31/04 01 POLICE - CREDIT 01-210-62-00-5409 09/28/04 -66.25
MAINTENANCE - VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: -66.25
660672 08/04/04 01 SEWER OP - SILICONE 52-000-65-00-5804 09/28/04 2.59
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 2.59
661325 08/09/04 01 STREETS - WRENCH 01-410-62-00-5409 09/28/04 8.49
MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 8.49
P30
09/22/04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 31
12:48:13 DETAIL BOARD REPORT
AP441000.WOW
INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 09/28/2004
✓DICE # INVOICE ITEM
DOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT
AUTO YORKVILLE AUTO PARTS
1767 08/11/04 01 STREETS - AIR & OIL FILTER 01-410-62-00-5409 09/28/04 27.64
MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 27.64
3573 08/24/04 01 ENG-BRACKET 01-150-62-00-5409 09/28/04 3.99
MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 3.99
3580 08/24/04 01 STREETS - BATTERY 01-410-62-00-5409 09/28/04 90.87
MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 90.87
3870 08/26/04 01 SEWER OP - 4 QTS HD30 52-000-65-00-5804 09/28/04 5.56
OPERATING SUPPLIES
INVOICE TOTAL: 5.56
;4328 08/30/04 01 STREETS - 1 RELAY 01-410-62-00-5409 09/28/04 13.99
`\/ MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES
�\{ INVOICE TOTAL: 13.99
54515 08/31/04 01 STREETS - 1 HONE 01-410-62-00-5409 09/28/04 17.49
V MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES
INVOICE TOTAL: 17.49
VENDOR TOTAL: 104.37
TOTAL ALL INVOICES: 374,926.00
P31
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
PAYROLL SUMMARY
PAY PERIOD ENDING 09/04/04
SOCIAL
REGULAR OVERTIME TOTAL SECURITY IMRF TOTALS
ADMINISTRATION $17,008.94 $0.00 $17,008.94 $1,301.18 $1,611.04 $19,921.16
ENGINEERING $9,211.79 $0.00 $9,211.79 $704.69 $927.63 $10,844.11
POLICE $48,994.12 $2,729.86 $51,723.98 $3,956.92 $391.69 $56,072.59
PUBLIC WORKS $17,127.12 $1,356.52 $18,483.64 $1,414.05 $1 ,861.31 $21,759.00
LIBRARY $5,118.18 $0.00 $5,118.18 $391.53 $330.62 $5,840.33
RECREATION $10,725.34 $0.00 $10,725.34 $820.53 $625.46 $12,171.33
PARKS $12,602.97 $427.09 $13,030.06 $996.76 $984.26 $15,011.08
TOTALS $120,788.46 $4,513.47 $125,301.93 $9,585.66 $6,732.01 $141,619.60
TOTAL INVOICES 9/28/2004 $374,926.00
TOTAL PAYROLL 9/4/2004 $141,619.60
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $516,545.60
Page 1 of 1
Liz D'Anna
From: Kelly Kramer[kkramer@dankramerlaw.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 1:30 PM
To: Idanna@yorkville.iLus
Subject: Fw: United City of Yorkville Agreement-Revised
Importance: High
Liz
For packets
Kelly
—Original Message —
From: Jonathan L. Fischel, AIA
To: Kelly Kramer
Cc: Tony Graff; Stephen Yas
Sent: Wednesday, September 22,2004 5:41 PM
Subject: United City of Yorkville Agreement-Revised
Kelly,
Attached please find a revised Owner/Planner Agreement(with modifications"red-lined"), responding to issues
identified at the 21 September 2004 Board Meeting, and in your letter dated 22 September 2004. Please note the
following responses to that letter:
Item 1: Regarding Reimbursable Expenses: Per the Board discussion,we have identified a "cap"of
approximately $2,700 for this item, and included, in Attachment C, a list of potential reimbursable expenses.
Item 2: Regarding interest-we have deleted this clause.
Item 3: Regarding mediation -we have deleted this clause. One possibility to consider is that this could be a
voluntary process where agreement of both parties would be required in order to implement it.
Item 4: Regarding termination-reference proposed language under Paragraph IX.D.
Item 4: Regarding ownership of documents-reference proposed language under Paragraph IX.E.
Item 5: Reference see language added per Paragraph V, regarding invoicing.
Kelly,we would appreciate if you would review this revised Agreement and email both of us with any questions, or
to confirm modifications.
Please identify the deadline for the 28 September 2004 Board packets.
Regards,
Jonathan L. Fischel,AIA, and Stephen Yas,AIA, RIBA
Yas/Fischel Partnership
1603 Orrington Avenue
Evanston, Illinois 60201-3841
Tel 847.475.0500
Fax 847.475.1501
9/23/2004
Y A S / F I S C H E L PARTNERSHIP
ARC H 1 T E C T U R E + URBAN DESIGN
1603 ORRINGTON AVENUE EVANSTON ILLINOIS USA60201 -3841
0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0
13 September 2004 Emailed this date
Revised 22 September 2004
Mr.Anton Graff
City Administrator
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville,Illinois 60560
Dear Mr.Graff:
Re: Professional Planning Services for a Municipal Facilities and Downtown Vision Plan
Pursuant to our discussions recently, we are submitting the following proposal for Planning Services for
the above referenced project. The scope of services is defined as follows:
For purposes of this Agreement, Owner is identified as United City of Yorkville (UCY), and Planner is
identified as Yas/Fischel Partnership(YFP).
I. Design Scope shall incorporate:
A. See Attachment A
II. Deliverables
A. Municipal Facilities Master Plan
1. Possible Building Types:
a. City Hall
b. Police Facility
c. Public Works
d. Library
e. Aquatic Center
f. Golf Course
g. Community Center
h. Community Building
i. Future Parks Building
2. For Each Building Type:
a. Area(sf)Summaries
b. "Ideal"Spatial Relationships Diagram
c. "Idealized"Prototypical Conceptual Design
d. Recommended Location Delineated for Each Building Type on Yorkville Plan
e. Final Report with Graphics
0 Tel . 8 4 7 . 4 7 5 . 0 5 0 0 0 Fax . 8 4 7 . 4 7 5 . 1 5 0 1 0
Project: Yorkville Municipal Facilities and Downtown Vision Plan
Letter to: Anton Graff
Date: 13 September 2004—Revised 22 September 2004
Page: 2 of 4
B. Downtown Redevelopment Plan
1. Base Drawing of Downtown
2. Conceptual Design Options(Maximum of Three)
3. Typical Conceptual Plans and Sections
4. Conceptual Landscape Plan
5. Conceptual Lighting Plan
6. Conceptual Signage Plan
7. Bird's-eye View Rendering of Vision(One)
8. Ground-level Rendering(s)of Vision(Maximum of Three)
9. Market Study Memo
10. Final Report with Graphics
III. Meetings
A. Staff Meetings
1. To Define Scope
2. Building Type Interviews
3. Building Type Product Reviews
4. Financial Workshop
5. Downtown Vision Plan of In-Progress"Conceptual"Options
6. Downtown Vision"Final"Plan
B. Board Meetings
1. Listening Session to Solicit Ideas
2. Meeting to Present Facilities Plan
3. Financial Workshop
4. Presentation of Downtown Vision Plan Conceptual Options
5. Downtown Vision Plan Final Plan
C. Public Meetings
1. City Listening Session#1
2. City Listening Session#2
3. City Listening Session#3/Public Forum to Present the Vision
IIV. ClientOwner Contact
A. Mr.Anton Graff;Mr.Bart Olsen
V. Compensation
A. Fixed Fee of$116,732.00.
B. Reimbursable Expenses: Estimated to be approximately$3.300.00. If reimbursable expenses
will exceed this amount, Yas/Fischel Partnership shall inform the Owner for authorization for
additional expenditures.
Customary Reimbursable Expenses. Consists of Printing, Plotting, Materials, Postage,
Express Mail, Messenger Service, Mileage, etc. Reference Attachment C for Schedule of
Reimbursable Expenses.at cost plus 15%.
❑
0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑
Project: Yorkville Municipal Facilities and Downtown Vision Plan
Letter to: Anton Graff
Date: 13 September 2004—Revised 22 September 2004
Page: 3 of 4
Note: Services are invoiced monthly and are due in full upon receipt of invoice. Each invoice
shall be accompanied by an explanation of services performed during that billing period.
All invoices past due over 30 days are assessed 1% interest per month(12% annually.)
VI. Schedule
A. 6—8 months(See Attachment B.)
VIII. Additional meetings/services are billed at the following rates:
Partner $150/hour
Project Architect/Planner $100/hour
Architect/Planner $ 80/hour
Administrative $ 65/hour
IIX. Standard YFPSupplementary Contract Clauses
A. Payment shall be due for services rendered. This contract is not contingent upon whether or
not the project goes forward.
B. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CLAUSE
The Owner and the ArchitectPlanner have discussed the risks, rewards and benefits of the project
and the ArchitectPlanner's total fee for services. The risks have been allocated such that the
Owner agrees that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the ArchitectPlanner's total liability to
the Owner for any and all injuries, claims, losses, expenses, damages or claims expenses arising
out of this Agreement from any cause or causes, shall not exceed a multiple of twice the actual
fee amount. Such causes include but are not limited to the rehiteetPlanner's negligence, errors,
omissions,strict liability,or breach of contract.
C. MEDIATION CLAUSE
All claims, disputes, and controversies arising out of or in relation to the performance,
Rules of the American Arbitration Association prior to any recourse to arbitration or a judicial
forum.
D. TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon not less than seven days' written notice
should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement through no fault of the party initiating the termination. This Agreement may be
L7
0 ❑ 0 0 0 ❑
Project: Yorkville Municipal Facilities and Downtown Vision Plan
Letter to: Anton Graff
Date: 13 September 2004—Revised 22 September 2004
Page: 4 of 4
terminated by the Owner upon not less than fourteen (14) days' written notice to the Planner for
the Owner's convenience and without cause. In the event of termination not the fault of the
Planner, the Planner shall be compensated for services performed prior to termination. together
with Reimbursable Expenses then due.
E. OWNERSHIP OF INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE:
The Owner acknowledges the Planner's documents, including electronic files, as instruments of
professional service. Nevertheless, the final documents prepared under this Agreement shall
become the property of the Owner upon completion of the the services and payment in full of all
monies due the Planner. Planner shall retain the right to use project materials for promotional
business purposes.
If you agree with the above, please sign below and forward one original signed copy to this office with a
10%retainer(which will be drawn down from the final invoice) in the amount of$11,673.00, which will
signify the start of this project.
Yas/Fischel Partnership is very interested in being an integral part of your team throughout the design
and, later the construction process. Mr. Graff, we share your vision and enthusiasm for this pivotal
project in Yorkville,Illinois.
With Best Regards,
Stephen Yas,AIA,RIBA Jonathan Fischel,AIA Authorized Representative
Partner Partner United City of Yorkville
Yas/Fischel Partnership Yas/Fischel Partnership
Date: Date: Date:
\\YfpO81PRJ\Yorkville-(United City of)\Municipal Fac MP+Downtown RADocs\CoteracMgreement 2004-09-22a.doc
0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0
YORKVILLE MUNICIPAL FACILITIES and DOWNTOWN VISION PLAN,YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS
ATTACHMENT C TO OWNER/PLANNER AGREEMENT DATED 13 SEPTEMBER 2004
YAS/FISCHEL PARTNERSHIP EVANSTON,ILLINOIS
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Reproduction and Document Preparation
Copies
8-1/2"x 11" $.12 per copy
11"x 17" $.24 per copy
Word Processing $3.00 per page
CAD Plotting
8-1/2 x 11 or 11 x 17 Bond $5.00 per sheet
30 x 42 Bond $10.00 per sheet
30 x 42 Translucent Bond $12.00 per sheet
30 x 42 Vellum $20.00 per sheet
30 x 42 Color $30.00 per sheet
Photographic and Printing Services Cost x 1.15
Supplies Cost x 1.15
Travel Cost x 1.15
and Mileage @ Current IRS Standard Mileage
Rate
Delivery Service/UPS/Postage Cost x 1.15
Telephone(long distance only) Cost x 1.15
- 1 -
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
To: Tony Graff, City Administrator ,
From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer , Ns,
Subject: Subdivision Control Ordinance= ffecti'e Date
Date: September 22, 2004
Eric mentioned that there was some discussion at Committee of the Whole regarding the
effective date of the proposed Subdivision Control Ordinance and which developments
would need to abide by it. We have always used the date of approval by City Council as the
effective date of the ordinance. Any developments with annexation agreements that are
approved prior to the effective date of the ordinance would not have to abide by it's
standards. Most of the changes in the ordinance are relatively minor, and some benefit the
developer (for such items as streetlight maintenance, storm sewer manholes, etc.).
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please see me.
Cc: Dan Kramer, City Attorney
Liz D'Anna, Deputy City Clerk
United City of Yorkville
t 11
EST.iti _ 12641 1836 County Seat of Kendall County
800 Game Farm Road
..r111 Yorkville, Illinois, 60560
"�,9 Telephone: 630-553-4350
�tG��CE ��? Fax: 630 553 7575
Website: www.yorkville.il.us
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING SAFETY
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 24, 2004
TO: Art Prochaska, Mayor
FROM: William A. Dettmer, de Official
SUBJECT: Fire Department Impact Fee Request Report
Per your request, I have reviewed the Fire Department's report and find it is excellently
written and covers their needs for capital outlay. The report, however, does not extend their
needs over a period of years. Therefore, I would like to offer the following: It is my
understanding that the Council agreed that single-family and single-family attached dwellings
would be $1000. Multi-family dwellings however, should not be included in the $1000
requirement, as it would be built to a higher standard and is placed in the commercial fee
schedule.
In reviewing the report for commercial development, their request was for .1256 - .205¢
per square foot. I would like to offer you the following as a recommendation. I believe their
request should be granted over a period of 3.5 years. The fees to be collected for commercial,
multi-family and industrial buildings, I recommend as follows:
1. A fee of .10¢ per square foot, with a minimum fee of $1000.00 for the first 18
months.
2. A fee of .12¢ per square foot, with a minimum fee of$1200.00 beginning May 1,
2006.
3. A fee of.15¢ per square foot, with a minimum fee of$1500.00 beginning May 1,
2007.
Page2
The reason we are talking about a minimum fee is it would cover fees for buildings
coming in with approximately 10;000 square feet. The square footage fee would come in after
that point. Generally, it takes a period of 3-5 years for this schedule to be put in place and it
would not create a overage cost to commercial and industrial builders as they are coming into the
municipality, but will give a basis and a cost for equipment increases over that period of time.
Should you have any questions, please contact me.
Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District
Development Fee Request Report
September 16, 2004
Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District
103 East Beaver Street
Yorkville, Illinois 60560
630 553-6186
Page 1
The Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District provides fire protection, emergency medical
services (EMS), and rescue services for the majority of The United City of Yorkville, a
portion of The Village of Montgomery, and unincorporated sections of Kendall County
for a total protection area of approximately 81 square miles. Rapid growth within the
Fire Protection District has placed a critical financial burden on providing services to all
areas of the District. The vast majority of the new growth, and thus the greatest impact,
is occurring within the municipalities served by the District. Tax levy dollars are not
being generated in the time frame needed to build services to accommodate this new
growth. The following excerpt from The Elburn Herald, In Focus, dated September 16,
2004, provides additional information that may clarify this point.
"Because of the way the property tax system works, it takes multiple calendar years for
the full tax revenue of an individual piece of developed property to pay its own cost in
services and educational support. This means that entities such as fire, police, emergency
medical responders and school districts are consistently playing monetary catch-up in
regions that experience consistent, significant growth."
The Fire District's primary source of income is through a tax levy. Ambulance fees and
development fees generate a considerably smaller portion of the funds. Development
fees are a preferred method of generating funds to provide infrastructure to new growth
areas, as they allow the new growth to pick up the burden placed on the District that the
new growth creates. The Fire Protection District cannot impose a development fee.
The fees are imposed and collected for the Fire Protection District by the municipalities
within the District through Pre-Annexation Agreements.
The cost of the impact of new growth is not a simple calculation. Many cost and time
variables can affect these calculations. The Fire Protection District has made a
reasonable effort to calculate these costs as accurately as possible.
Several factors and variables have been considered in making the calculations. Some
of these factors will have a greater influence on the recommendation than others;
however, the final recommendation is based on the cumulative assessment of all factors
as they relate to the Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District.
• Population Growth
• Fire District's Demographics
• Existing Fire Station Appropriateness
• Staffing Philosophy
• Property Availability
• Industrial Standards for Station Placement
• Insurance Service Offices, Inc.
• NFPA 1710 & 1720
• Fire Prevention Bureau
• Preemption Traffic Control Equipment
• Automatic Response Areas and Partnerships
• Fiscal Capabilities
• Equipment
Page 2
In order to calculate the impact of development on the District, it utilized the most
common references for Fire Departments, the ISO publication and the ISO Fire
Suppression Rating Schedule. These publications were used to "...review available
public fire suppression facilities, and to develop a Public Protection Classification for
insurance purposes." Although the primary purpose of this tool is to rate fire protection
so that insurance rates can be established, ISO ratings have also been one of the few
standards used to compare community fire protection. Realizing the true intent of the
ISO classification as a method for determining insurance rates, ISO is not the sole
determining factor in establishing a public fire protection program. The schedule was
considered as an instrument for comparison and as an additional factor for
consideration when making decisions for increasing facilities to accommodate the new
growth.
Paragraph 560 of the schedule states, "...the built-upon area of the City should have a
first due Engine Company within 11/2 miles, and a ladder-service company within 21/2
miles". This distance is recognized by ISO as an acceptable level of fire protection. It
can be determined how long it takes for fire units to travel this distance in order to meet
the ISO standard. Based on the 11/2-mile distance standard, a community may determine
its desired average travel time by plugging in its approximate vehicle speed of responding
fire equipment. Given the topography, road system, actual time, and distance studies, it
is reasonable to figure that an average vehicle with a speed of 35 mph will take
approximately 21/2 minutes travel time to cover 1'/2 miles. The FSRS also indicates, when
the fire flow requirement is less than 2,000 gallons per minute (GPM), and the area is
primarily residential, it is generally acceptable to have the first due Engine Company as
much as two miles away. Given an average speed of 35 mph, it will take approximately
3'/2 minutes to travel two miles. Obviously, higher, or lower average vehicle speeds will
impact the distance covered and the travel time.
The minimum cost directly related to adding stations to protect a single response area is
calculated as follows:
Three bay station with crew quarters $1,800,000.00
Ambulance $250,000.00
Engine $350,000.00
Equipment on ambulance and engine $300,000.00
Station equipment $200,000.00
1/2 Ladder truck $375,000.00
$3,275,000.00
It should be noted that there are NO property costs associated with the dollar
amounts described above.
The next calculation needed is the area protected by a station. Using the ISO schedule,
a station response area of a circle 1 1/2 miles radius encompasses 7.065 square miles.
In other words, a station will cover an area of 4,522 acres and may not be fully able to
Page 3
cover all of the needs in any one area. Station coverage should not be calculated by
square miles only. Other factors like response times and population also have to be
figured into the formulas. Support from other stations or departments will be
required to fully provide all services needed at all times.
The next calculation needed is density. This is a number that can vary greatly. Current
density, land topography, waterways, roadways and zoning are among the many
variables that can have an affect on density calculations. In an effort to calculate a
reasonable average density, we referred to the document titled "Current and Pending
Residential Developments", dated August 5, 2004, addressed to the Yorkville Planning
Commission from Bart Olson. We took the number of units approved, divided by the
acres for each development and averaged them all together to determine a true
average number of units per acre.
Development Units Acres Average
Cimarron Ridge 75 40.82 1.8373
Corner Stone 30 36.75 0.8163
Country Hills 172 65.6 2.622
Fox Highlands 123 34.71 3.5436
Grand Reserve 2650 1127.3 2.3507
Greenbriar 186 166 1.1205
Heartland Circle 250 129.55 1.9298
Heartland Subdivision 186 135.58 1.3719
Kylyn's Crossing - West 111 56.6 1.9611
Kylyn's Ridge 134 70 1.9143
Longford Lakes 62 13.6 4.5588
Prairie Gardens 56 24.2 2.314
Prairie Meadows 442 142.2 3.1083
Raintree Village 642 320 2.0063
River's Edge 166 96.906 1.713
Sunflower Estates 117 65.19 1.7948
White Oak Estates 87 113.78 0.7647
Wildwood 431 187.77 2.2954
Windett Ridge 418 163 2.5644
Average number of units per acre 2.1362
With the density calculation determined, it now becomes a matter of determining what
level of build-out that justifies the need for a new facility. We feel it is not in the best
interest of the District or its residents to wait until there is 100% build-out. We feel that a
build-out level between 30% and 40% is appropriate to use as the calculation needed to
base the fee for the construction of a new facility to service the response area. A build
out level between 60% and 70% will require additional EMS and fire equipment. As the
build-out approaches 100%, additional equipment and station facilities will be required,
Page 4
thus requiring the development fee to continue to be collected as the build-out
continues. The estimated population is based on a conservative estimate of 3 people
per unit.
Acres per Estimated
Units per acre area Units per area % Build out Total units population Cost per unit
2.1362 4522 9660 100 9660 28980 $339.03
2.1362 4522 9660 90 8694 26082 $376.70
2.1362 4522 9660 80 7728 23184 $423.79
2.1362 4522 9660 70 6762 20286 $484.33
2.1362 4522 9660 60 5796 17388 $565.05
2.1362 4522 9660 50 4830 14490 $678.06
2.1362 4522 9660 40 3864 11592 $847.58
2.1362 4522 9660 30 2898 8694 $1,130.10
The next calculation needed is a rate for commercial properties. Commercial properties
have different needs and may require different methods to establish a fair rate for
development fees.
Using a residential development fee rate of$678.06 per residential unit, an acre of land
would have an impact value of$678.06 X 2.1362 = $1,448.47. Using the recently
approved "Saravanos Properties Annexation Exhibit", a calculation was made to try to
mirror the residential unit fee. The Saravanos site is 10.15 acres and has 59,700
square feet of commercial structures on the property. This equates to 5,882 square feet
of commercial structure per acre. To generate the same development fee per acre, a
square foot rate of$.2462 is needed.
Using a residential development fee rate of$1,130.10 per residential unit, an acre of
land would have an impact value of$1,130.10 X 2.1362 = $2,414.12. At 5,882 square
feet of commercial structure per acre, a similar development fee rate of$.41 per square
foot is needed.
Given the above information, the Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District is requesting the
development fees collected for the District be set at a rate between $847.58 and
$1,130.10 for residential units. We realize that the impact of commercial properties on
the District is less than the impact of residential properties. The District is requesting
the develpoment fees collected for commercial properties be set at a rate between
$.125 and $.205 per square foot.
Page 5
09/24/2004 09.27 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J. KRAMER 0 002/004
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
) ss
COUNTY OF KENDALL )
ORDINANCE NO. 2004-
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FOX HILL SUBDIVISION
(JEANNE DRESDEN AS TRUSTEE FOR TRUST#8589 OR NOMINEE)
(DCI-CHARRINGTON,INC., OR NOMINEE)
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, Kendall
County, Illinois, that a certain Proposed Fourth Amendment to Planned Unit Development
Agreement pertaining to the development of the real estate described on Exhibit"A"attached hereto
and made a part hereof entered into by the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE; and
WHEREAS,said Proposed Fourth Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement has
been drafted and has been considered by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the legal owners of record of the territory which is the subject of said
Agreement arc ready,willing and able to enter into said Agreement and to perform the obligations as
required hereunder; and
WHEREAS,the statutory procedures provided in 65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-1, as amended, for the
execution of said Proposed Fourth Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement has been
1
09/24/2004 09:27 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J. KRAMER l 003/004
fully complied with; and
WHEREAS, the property is already within the boundaries of the City:
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF
THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1:That the Mayor and City Clerk are herewith authorized and directed to execute,on
behalf of the City, an Proposed Fourth Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement
concerning the development of the real estate described in the attached Exhibit"A",a copy of which
Proposed Fourth Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement is attached hereto and made
a part hereof.
Section 2: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
approval as provided by law.
WANDA OHARE JOSEPH BESCO
VALERIE BURR PAUL JAMES
LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS
ROSE SPEARS RICHARD STICKA
APPROVED by me,as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois,this
day of ,A.D. 20
MAYOR
2
09/24/2004 09:27 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J. KRAMER a 004/004
PASSED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois this
day of , A.D. 20
Attest:
CITY CLERK
Prepared by:
Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer
1107A S. Bridge St.
Yorkville,IL 60560
630.553.9500
3
09/22/2004 1 155 FAX 830 553 5764 DANIEL J KRAMER Z 002/007
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
ss
COUNTY OP KENDALL )
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
FOR
RAINTREE VILLAGE UNIT FOUR
WHEREAS, the City Council of the United City of Yorkville has considered a Petition to
approve the Final Plat of Raintree Village Unit Four; and
WHEREAS,the City Council of Yorkville has received a positive recommendation from the
Plan Commission of the United City of Yorkville recommending approval of said Final Plat of
Subdivision; and
NOW THEREFORE,upon Motion duly made,seconded and approved by a majority of those
members of the City Council voting the following action is taken by the City Council:
1, The Final Plat of Raintree Village Unit Four is approved and all City officials are
authorized to execute the same.
WANDA OHARE JOSEPH BES CO
VALERIE BURD PAUL JAMES
LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS
ROSE SPEARS RICHARD STICKA
1
09/22/2004 11 :55 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J. KRAMER Vi 003/007
APPROVED by me,as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois,this
day of ,A.D. 20
MAYOR
PASSED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois this
day of , A.D. 20
Attest:
CITY CLERK
Prepared by:
Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer
1107A S. Bridge St.
Yorkville, IL 60560
630.553.9500
2
09/22/2004 1 1. 55 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J KRAMER Z 004/007
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
) ss
COUNTY OF KENDALL )
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
FOR
RAINTREE VILLAGE UNIT FIVE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the United City of Yorkville has considered a Petition to
approve the Final Plat of Raintree Village Unit Five; and
WHEREAS,the City Council of Yorkville has received a positive recommendation from the
Plan Commission of the United City of Yorkville recommending approval of said Final Plat of
Subdivision; and
NOW THEREFORE,upon Motion duly made,seconded and approved by a majority of those
members of the City Council voting the following action is taken by the City Council:
1. The Final Plat of Raintree Village Unit Five is approved and all City officials are
authorized to execute the same.
WANDA OHARE JOSEPH BESCO
VALERIE BURD PAUL JAMES
LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS
ROSE SPEARS RICHARD STICKA
09/22/2004 11 :56 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J. KRAMER lj 005/007
APPROVED by me,as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois,this
day of , A.D. 20
MAYOR
PASSED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois this
day of , A.D. 20
Attest:
CITY CLERK
Prepared by:
Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer
1107A S. Bridge St.
Yorkville, IL 60560
630553.9500
2
09/22/2004 11: 56 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J. KRAMER Z006/007
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
) ss
COUNTY OF KENDALL )
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
FOR
RAINTREE VILLAGE UNIT SIX
WHEREAS, the City Council of the United City of Yorkville has considered a Petition to
approve the Final Plat of Raintree Village Unit Six; and
WHEREAS,the City Council of Yorkville has received a positive recommendation from the
Plan Commission of the United City of Yorkville recommending approval of said Final Plat of
Subdivision; and
NOW THEREFORE,upon Motion duly made,seconded and approved by a majority of those
members of the City Council voting the following action is taken by the City Council:
1. The Final Plat of Raintree Village Unit Six is approved and all City officials are
authorized to execute the same.
WANDA OHARE JOSEPH BESCO
VALERIE BURD PAUL JAMES
LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS
ROSE SPEARS RICHARD STICKA
1
09/22/2004 11 : 56 FAX 830 553 5764 DANIEL J. KRAMER 007/007
APPROVED by me,as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois,this
day of , A.D. 20 .
MAYOR
PASSED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois this
day of , A.D. 20
Attest:
CITY CLERK
Prepared by:
Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer
1107A S. Bridge St.
Yorkville, IL 60560
630.553.9500
2