Loading...
Public Works Packet 2018 01-16-18 AGENDA PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, January 16, 2018 6:00 p.m. City Hall Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL Citizen Comments: Minutes for Correction/Approval: December 19, 2017 New Business: 1. PW 2018-01 Snow Operations Report 2. PW 2018-02 Water Department Reports for October, November and December 2017 3. PW 2018-03 Capital Improvement Projects Update 4. PW 2018-04 Bond/LOC Reduction Quarterly Update 5. PW 2018-05 MFT Resolution for 2018 Road to Better Roads Program 6. PW 2018-06 Letter of Support to IDOT for Funding for Intersection Improvement at Route 47 and Galena Road and for Expansion of the Northern Illinois Route 47 Corridor 7. PW 2018-07 Wyland National Mayors Challenge for Conservation Old Business: 1. ADM 2017-70 Building Conditions Survey Results Additional Business: 2017/2018 City Council Goals – Public Works Committee Goal Priority Staff “Municipal Building Needs and Planning” 5 Bart Olson & Eric Dhuse “Vehicle Replacement” 6 Bart Olson & Eric Dhuse “Water Planning” 8 Eric Dhuse & Brad Sanderson “Capital Improvement Plan” 11 Bart Olson & Eric Dhuse “Water Conservation Plan” 15 Eric Dhuse & Brad Sanderson United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 www.yorkville.il.us UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE Tuesday, January 16, 2018 6:00 PM CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. December 19, 2017 □ Approved __________ □ As presented □ With corrections --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2018-01 Snow Operations Report □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PW 2018-02 Water Department Reports for October, November, and December 2017 □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. PW 2018-03 Capital Improvement Projects Update □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. PW 2018-04 Bond/LOC Reduction Quarterly Update □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. PW 2018-05 MFT Resolution for 2018 Road to Better Roads Program □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. PW 2018-06 Letter of Support to IDOT for Funding for Intersection Improvement at Route 47 and Galena Road and for Expansion of the Northern Illinois Route 47 Corridor □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. PW 2018-07 Wyland National Mayors Challenge for Conservation □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OLD BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ADM 2017-70 Building Condition Survey Results □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Minutes Tracking Number Minutes of the Public Works Committee – December 19, 2017 Public Works Committee – January 16, 2018 Majority Committee Approval Minute Taker Name Department Page 1 of 2 DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE Tuesday, December 19, 2017, 6:00pm Yorkville City Hall, Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road IN ATTENDANCE: Committee Members Chairman Joel Frieders Alderman Ken Koch Alderman Jackie Milschewski Absent: Alderman Seaver Tarulis Other City Officials City Administrator Bart Olson Interim Assistant City Administrator Erin Willrett Public Works Director Eric Dhuse Engineer Brad Sanderson, EEI Other Guests: None The meeting was called to order at 6:02pm by Chairman Joel Frieders. Citizen Comments: None Previous Meeting Minutes: November 21, 2017 The minutes were approved as presented. New Business: 1. PW 2017-85 Snow Operations Report Mr. Dhuse reported 1 brining and 1 salt application so far. He will report each month. 2. PW 2017-86 2017 Road to Better Roads Program – Change Order No. 1 This is the final order for the regular contract and resulted in a decrease of $11,738.07. Chairman Frieders asked to move this to the regular agenda. 3. PW 2017-87 Road to Better Roads Program Additional Work – Change Order No. 1 This change order for the additional work performed, resulted in a decrease of $22,081.07. This moves to the consent agenda. 4. PW 2017-88 Center Parkway / Countryside Parkway Resurfacing – Change Order No. 1 A decrease of $35,395.58 was reflected in this first and final change order and will move to the consent agenda. Page 2 of 2 5. PW 2017-89 Kennedy Road Resurfacing -Change Order No. 1 This project completed by Geneva Construction also reflects a decrease, which is in the amount of $34,884.06. This moves to the regular agenda per Chairman Frieders. 6. PW2017-90 2018 Sanitary Sewer Lining Engineering Agreement Mr. Olson referred to the agreement in the packet and said it should be approved now for the schedule that construction crews adopt in November and December. The agreement deals with design and construction engineering. This moves to consent. 7. PW 2017-91 East Orange Street Water Main Replacement Engineering Agreement This is a large, costly project and only design engineering will be addressed for certain sections. The design agreement for $43,000 is budgeted and recommended. A separate contract will be brought back for the construction engineering. Mr. Dhuse said the water main in this area is from 1939. He also said the fire flow would improve with this project. This moves to consent agenda. 8. PW 2017-92 Bristol Bay Unit 11 – Partial Acceptance Mr. Sanderson reported this is related to the annexation agreement amendment and is the formal acceptance of a portion of Unit 11. He recommended reduction of the bonds and he said there is still a a 1-year maintenance agreement for $16,159. All punchlist items are completed and this moves to the consent agenda. 9. PW 2017-93 Water Code Amendment – Section 7-5-4-1 Meter Costs Ms. Willrett said this a cleanup for a staff error when the water ordinance was updated in October. The meter costs had already been done in July. This moves to the consent agenda. Old Business: 1. ADM 2017-70 Building Conditions Survey Results Ms. Willrett presented two more building reports: Beecher Center and Wolf Street building (which houses the Public Works Department). She outlined the repairs needed at Beecher and said the overall building condition is fair. An RFP will go out for repair costs and the recommendation by staff is to continue to maintain this building. She also detailed the issues and repair costs for the Wolf St. building. Staff also recommends maintaining this building since it is in good condition. There was some further discussion by the committee. These two buildings will also be discussed at next month's Administration Committee meeting. Additional Business: Chairman Frieders asked what the process is for forced annexation of businesses. Mr. Olson said there are certain guidelines as part of the Comp Plan. Mr. Frieders said with the gas station coming in on McHugh, it would make good sense for contiguity, to include the parcels still outside the city limits. In conjuncton, Mr. Olson said people are still burning leaves in that area. It is illegal in the city limits and the County is not enforcing it at this time. In another matter, it was noted the school district has not yet approved the TIF. There was no further business and the meeting was adjourned at 6:28pm. Minutes respectfully transcribed by Marlys Young, Minute Taker Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #1 Tracking Number PW 2018-01 Snow Removal Update Public Works Committee – January 16, 2018 None, informational only Monthly update of snow removal operations Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department Summary Below please find the monthly report for snow removal operations. I have also included salt and brine data that we have gathered from our trucks. December 24, 2017 This event started slow and lingered for hours longer than expected. We had a crew of 12 employees in working from 8:00am-7:30pm. During this time, we used approximately 60 tons of salt and 1500 gallons of brine. December 25, 2017 Crews came back in to try and remove as much snow as possible from the streets before the temperatures dropped below zero and snow became frozen to the streets. During this operation, we had 13 drivers in from 10:00am-2:00pm, used approximately 50 tons of salt and 1500 gallons of brine. December 29, 2017 We had two separate events, early morning and late evening. The first event was a salt only event from 5:00am-7:00am. There were 9 drivers to cover all 9 routes. The evening event was a full snow removal event that started at 7:00 pm and lasted until 1:15 am. This was a full plowing and salting operation for 12 drivers. December 30, 2017 This was a cleanup and re-salt operation due to blowing snow. 9 drivers plowed and salted all streets from 1:00pm – 5:45pm. I have attached a spreadsheet that outlines the usage of salt and brine for the 12/29 and 12/30 events for your review. January 7, 2018 A crew of 10 drivers were called in for a salt only operation due to freezing rain and snow. The operation was from 2:00pm-5:30 pm. January 8, 2018 A crew of 10 drivers were called in for a salt only operation due to overnight snow/ice pellets. The operation was from 4:00am-7:00am. I have attached a spreadsheet that outlines the usage of salt and brine for the 1/7 and 1/8 events for your review. Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works CC: Bart Olson, Administrator Date: January 9, 2018 Subject: January Snow Operations Report Recommendation I would ask that this be placed on the January 16, 2018 Public Works Committee meeting as an informational item. If you have any questions or need further information, please let me know. 12/29 & 12/30 1/4/2018 Recorder JS Total Miles Average Lbs of Tons of Lbs of Gallons of Gal Brine/ Route Truck ID Driven MPH Salt Used Salt Used Salt/Mi. Brine Used Ton Salt 1 9 137 14.60 23991 12.00 557 481 40.10 2 27 119 9.20 20120 10.06 492 393 39.07 3 4 13 127 12.50 27429 13.71 484 244 17.79 5 23 189 14.30 50415 25.21 507 652 25.87 6 10 81 7.70 23122 11.56 503 307 26.55 7 28 112 10.50 29927 14.96 537 219 14.64 8 22 79 13.00 17711 8.86 492 0 0.00 9 11 140 11.90 29376 14.69 501 430 29.28 983 11.71 222091 111 509.03 2726 24.16 Avg. Avg. Avg. 1/7 & 1/8 1/9/2018 Recorder ED Total Miles Average Lbs of Tons of Lbs of Gallons of Gal Brine/ Route Truck ID Driven MPH Salt Used Salt Used Salt/Mi. Brine Used Ton Salt 1 9 122.00 15.10 38416 19.21 653.33 576.00 29.99 2 27 97.40 11.20 38581 19.29 553.53 650.00 33.70 3 4 13 96.00 10.30 34143 17.07 570.00 471.00 27.59 5 23 108.10 15.20 36386 18.19 506.77 612.00 33.64 6 10 92.00 11.70 38912 19.46 553.51 430.00 22.10 7 28 91.80 13.10 29927 14.96 448.68 501.00 33.48 8 22 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 #DIV/0! 0.00 #DIV/0! 9 11 94.20 9.40 39397 19.70 549.47 579.00 29.39 702 10.75 255762 128 547.90 3819 29.98 Avg. Avg. Avg. EVENT TOTALS No Data Available.  Route driven by small trucks with no recording capabilities. No Data Available.  Route driven by small trucks with no recording capabilities. Snow Event Date Date of Recording Snow Operations Salt and Brine Data Snow Operations Salt and Brine Data Snow Event Date Date of Recording EVENT TOTALS Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #2 Tracking Number PW 2018-02 Water Department Reports for October, November, and December 2017 Public Works Committee – January 16, 2018 Majority Approval Monthly water reports. Tom Konen Public Works Name Department 4.0 CI?, United City of Yorkville E.tk-ins WATER DEPARTMENT REPORT LE 0 OCTOBER 2017 MONTH I YEAR WELLS NO WELL DEPTH PUMP DEPTH WATER ABOVE PUMP THIS MONTH'S PUMPAGE FEET) FEET) FEET) GALLONS) 4 1401 665 204 21,909,000 7 1527 1105 430 7,678,000 8 1384 840 170 19,352,000 9 1368 870 463 000 TOTAL TREATED 45,466,000 CURRENT MONTH'S PUMPAGE IS 9,066,000 GALLONS less THAN LAST MONTH 3,268,000 GALLONS more THAN LAST YEAR DAILY AVERAGE PUMPED: 1,466,645 GALLONS DAILY MAXIMUM PUMPED: 1,903,000 GALLONS DAILY AVERAGE PER CAPITA USE:81.48 GALLONS WATER TREATMENT: CHLORINE: 777 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 3.0 MG/L FLUORIDE: 64 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 39 MG/L POLYPHOSPHATE:1295 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 1.33 MG/L WATER QUALITY: BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLES ANALYZED BY ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY: 27 SATISFACTORY 0 UNSATISFACTORY (EXPLAIN) FLOURIDE: 3 SAMPLE(S)TAKEN CONCENTRATION: 0.75 MG/L MAINTENANCE: NUMBER OF METERS REPLACED: 11 NUMBER OF LEAKS OR BREAKS REPAIRED: 0 MXU'S: 12 BATTERIES: 2 NEW CUSTOMERS: RESIDENTIAL: 19 COMMERCIAL: 0 INDUSTRIAL/GOVERNMENTAL: 0 COMMENTS: C,T, United City ofityofYorestkWATERDEPARTMENTREPORT E 0).7 NOVEMBER 2017 MONTH / YEAR WELLS NO WELL DEPTH PUMP DEPTH WATER ABOVE PUMP THIS MONTH'S PUMPAGE FEET) FEET) FEET) GALLONS) 4 1386 664 384 18,682,000 7 1527 1125 430 7,180,000 8 1384 840 450 15,370,000 9 1368 861 498 4,190,000 TOTAL TREATED 42,122,000 CURRENT MONTH'S PUMPAGE IS 3,344,000 GALLONS less THAN LAST MONTH 985,000 GALLONS more THAN LAST YEAR DAILY AVERAGE PUMPED: 1,404,066 GALLONS DAILY MAXIMUM PUMPED: 2,113,000 GALLONS DAILY AVERAGE PER CAPITA USE:78.00 GALLONS WATER TREATMENT: CHLORINE: 918 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 3.0 MG/L FLUORIDE: 185 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 59 MG/L POLYPHOSPHATE: 1,156 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 97 MG/L WATER QUALITY: BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLES ANALYZED BY ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY: 27 SATISFACTORY 1 UNSATISFACTORY (EXPLAIN) FLOURIDE: 3 SAMPLE(S)TAKEN CONCENTRATION: 0.75 MG/L MAINTENANCE: NUMBER OF METERS REPLACED: 6 NUMBER OF LEAKS OR BREAKS REPAIRED: 1 MXU'S: 2 BATTERIES REPLACED: 13 NEW CUSTOMERS: RESIDENTIAL: 14 COMMERCIAL: 0 INDUSTRIAL/GOVERNMENTAL: 0 COMMENTS: Service break: Heaustis Street at Casa Santiago, Unknown amount lost. so o-T o United City of Yorkville WATER DEPARTMENT REPORT DECEMBER 2017 MONTH / YEAR WELLS NO WELL DEPTH PUMP DEPTH WATER ABOVE PUMP THIS MONTH'S PUMPAGE FEET) FEET) FEET) GALLONS) 4 1386 664 384 21,018,000 7 1527 1125 430 7,233,000 8 1384 840 456 8,540,000 9 1368 861 509 8,649,000 TOTAL TREATED 41,987,000 CURRENT MONTH'S PUMPAGE IS 253,000 GALLONS less THAN LAST MONTH 1,410,000 GALLONS more THAN LAST YEAR DAILY AVERAGE PUMPED: 1,354,419 GALLONS DAILY MAXIMUM PUMPED: 2,153,000 GALLONS DAILY AVERAGE PER CAPITA USE:75.24 GALLONS WATER TREATMENT: CHLORINE: 960 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 3.0 MG/L FLUORIDE: 129 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 74 MG/L POLYPHOSPHATE:1,119 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 97 MG/L WATER QUALITY: BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLES ANALYZED BY ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY: 27 SATISFACTORY 0 UNSATISFACTORY(EXPLAIN) FLOURIDE: 3 SAMPLE(S)TAKEN CONCENTRATION: 0.75 MG/L MAINTENANCE: NUMBER OF METERS REPLACED: 9 NUMBER OF LEAKS OR BREAKS REPAIRED: 2 MXU'S: 20 BATTERIES REPLACED: 1 NEW CUSTOMERS: _ RESIDENTIAL: 22 COMMERCIAL: 0 INDUSTRIAL/GOVERNMENTAL: 0 COMMENTS: Main breaks: 511 Madison Court: Lost 90,000 gallons. Route 47 and Beaver Street: Lost 360,000 gallons. Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number New Business #3 Tracking Number PW 2018-03 Capital Project Update Public Works Committee – January 16, 2018 None Status Update Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department The purpose of this memo is to update the Public Works Committee as to the status of the several projects. A brief summary on the status of the projects is provided below: Construction Projects Kennedy Shared Use Path – ITEP  The project is substantially complete. Punchlist items will be addressed in the spring. Planning/Design Projects Rt 71 Water main and Sanitary Sewer Relocation  Final plans have been submitted to IDOT. Permitting is in process.  Fox Highlands Plans need to be completed. Pavillion Road Streambank Stabilization  Design engineering is underway. We are tentatively targeting a June 2018 letting and a late summer/early fall construction. 2018 RTBR Program Final design has been initiated. We are tentatively targeting a March 2018 letting. Fountain Village – Completion of Improvements Final design has been initiated. We are tentatively targeting a February/March 2018 letting. 2018 Sanitary Sewer Lining Program Final design has been initiated. We are tentatively targeting a March 2017 letting. East Orange Street Water Main Improvements Final design has been initiated. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: January 10, 2018 Subject: Capital Improvement Projects Update Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #4 Tracking Number PW 2018-04 Bond/LOC Reduction Summary – December 31, 2017 Public Works Committee – January 16, 2018 Informational Informational Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Please see the attached reduction summary through December 31, 2017. If you have any questions, please let me know. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: January 10, 2018 Subject: 2017 Bond/LOC Reduction Summary – To Date 31-Dec-17 2017 Bond and Letter of Credit Reduction Report Date Development/Project Engineer Concurrence City Administrator Concurrence Mayor Concurrence Reduction Final Release Reduction Value Remaining Balance 1/10/2017 Hamman Water main X X X $3,774.09 $0.00 1/24/2017 Bristol Bay Unit 3 X X X $112,267.81 $172,371.00 2/28/2017 Caledonia X X X $416,010.52 $557,615.58 3/17/2017 Ashley Pointe X X X $58,781.25 $119,989.25 9/7/2017 Lot 19 - Yorkville Business Park X X X $5,371.20 $0.00 9/26/2017 Autumn Creek - Unit 2C X X X $458,854.83 $240,015.05 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #5 Tracking Number PW 2018-05 2018 Road to Better Roads Program Public Works Committee – January 16, 2018 Majority Consideration of Approval MFT Resolution Consideration Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department In accordance with the planned FY19 budget and Roads to Better Roads Program, we are proceeding with design of the 2018 program. The budgeted MFT portion of the Roads to Better Roads Program will be $460,000. Since MFT funds are being utilized to fund the project, IDOT requires the passing of a resolution to appropriate the funds. Accordingly, please see the attached Appropriation Resolution in the amount of $460,000. Staff is seeking approval of the resolution from the City Council. If you have any questions or require additional information, please let us know. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: January 5, 2018 Subject: 2018 Roads to Better Roads Program t Resolution for MaintenanceDepartrnero0 of Transportation Under the Illinois Highway Code Resolution Number Resolution Type Section Number Original 18-00000-00-GM BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Goveming Body Type Local Public Agency Type Yorkville Illinois that there is hereby appropriated the sum of four hundred sixty Name of Local Public Agency thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($460,000.00 of Motor Fuel Tax funds for the purpose of maintaining streets and highways under the applicable provisions of Illinois Highway Code from 05/01/18 to 04/30/19 . Beginning Date Ending Date BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that only those operations as listed and described on the approved Estimate of Maintenance Costs, including supplemental or revised estimates approved in connection with this resolution,are eligible for maintenance with Motor Fuel Tax funds during the period as specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that City of Yorkville Local Public Agency Type Name of Local Public Agency shall submit within three months after the end of the maintenance period as stated above,to the Department of Transportation,on forms available from the Department,a certified statement showing expenditures and the balances remaining in the funds authorized for expenditure by the Department under this appropriation,and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk is hereby directed to transmit four(4)ceritified originals of this resolution to the district office of the Department of Transportation. i Beth Warren City Clerk in and for said City Name of Clerk Local Public Agency Type Local Public Agency Type of Yorkville in the State of Illinois,and keeper of the records and files thereof,as Name of Local Public Agency provided by statute,do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by the Council of Yorkville at a meeting held on 01/23/18 Governing Body Type Name of Local Public Agency Date IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 23rd day of January, 2018 Month,Year SEAL) Clerk Signature APPROVED Regional Engineer Department of Transportation Date Printed 01/ 11/18 BLR 14220(Rev.03/13/17) Instructions for BLR 14220 This form shall be used when a Local Public Agency(LPA)wants to perform maintenance operations using Motor Fuel Tax(MFT)funds. Refer to Chapter 14 of the Bureau of Local Roads and Streets Manual(BLRS Manual)for more detailed information.This form is to be used by a Municipality or a County. Road Districts will use BLR 14221.For signature requirements refer to Chapter 2,Section 3.05(b)of the BLRS Manual. When filling out this form electronically,once a field is initially completed,fields requiring the same information will be auto-populated. Resolution Number Insert the resolution number as assigned by the LPA, if applicable. Resolution Type From the drop down box,choose the type of resolution: Original would be used when passing a resolution for the first time for this project. Supplemental would be used when passing a resolution increasing appropriation above previously passed resolutions. Amended would be used when a previously passed resolution is being amended. Section Number Insert the section number of the improvement covered by the resolution. Governing Body Type From the drop down box choose the type of administrative body.Choose Board for County;Council or President and Board of Trustees for a City,Village or Town. LPA Type From the drop down box choose the LPA body type;County,City,Town or Village. Name of LPA Insert the name of the LPA. Resolution Amount Insert the dollar value of the resolution for maintenance to be paid for with MFT funds in words, followed by the same amount in numerical format in the 0. Beginning Date Insert the beginning date of the maintenance period.Maintenance periods must be a 12 or 24 month consecutive period. Ending Date Insert the ending date of the maintenance period. LPA Type From the drop down box choose the LPA body type;County,City,Town or Village. Name of LPA Insert the name of the LPA. Name of Clerk Insert the name of the LPA Clerk. LPA Type From the drop down box choose the LPA body type;County, City,Town or Village. LPA Type From the drop down box choose the LPA body type;County,City,Town or Village. Name of LPA Insert the name of the LPA. Governing Body Type From the drop down box choose the type of administrative body.Choose Board for County;Council or President and Board of Trustees for a City,Village or Town. Name of LPA Insert the name of the LPA. Date Insert the date of the meeting. Day Insert the day the Clerk signed the document. Month,Year Insert the month and year of the clerk's signature. Clerk Signature Clerk shall sign here. Approved The Department of Transportation representative shall sign and date here upon approval. A minimum of four(4)certified signed originals must be submitted to the Regional Engineer's District office. Following the Regional Engineer's approval,distribution will be as follows: Local Public Agency Clerk Engineer(Municipal,Consultant or County) District Compliance Review District File Printed 01/11/18 BLR 14220(Rev.03/13/17) ix ip Municipal Estimate of10IibloisDepartment of Transportation Maintenance Costs o .4 °L Submittal Type Original Maintenance Period Local Public Agency County Section Number Beginning Ending City of Yorkville Kendall 18-00000-00-GM 05/01/18 4/30/2019 Estimated Cost of Maintenance Operations Maint. For Group I, IIA, IIB or III Maintenance Operation Eng. Insp. Unit Item Est Total No.and Description)Group Req. Item Unit Quantity Price Cost Operation Cost Resurfacing IV Y 460,000.00 Add Row Total Estimated Maintenance Operation Cost $460,000.00 Estimated Cost of Maintenance Engineering Maintenance Program Estimated Costs Preliminary Engineering Estimated Cost MFT Portion Other Funds Engineering Inspection Maint Oper 460,000.00 460,000.00 0.00 Material Testing Maint Eng Advertising Totals 460,000.00 460,000.00 0.00 Bridge Inspections Total Estimated Maintenance Cost 460,000.00 Total Estimated Maintenance Engineering Cost Submitted Municipal Official Date Approved Regional Engineer Department of Transportation Date Title Mayor Printed 01/10/18 Page 1 of 1 BLR 14231 (Rev.05/16/17) Instructions for BLR 14231 This form shall be used when a Municipality wants to expend funds for a maintenance period.The maintenance estimate must include all operations to be funded with Motor Fuel Tax(MFT)funds. If operations are added during the maintenance period,a revised or supplemental estimate is required.All estimates of maintenance costs must be submitted to the district for approval prior to incurring any expenses.The amount of MFT funds expended on items covered in the estimate is limited to the amount of MFT funds appropriated in the maintenance resolution.IF rental equipment is included in the estimate, BLR 12110 must also be completed and submitted. For additional information refer to the Bureau of Local Roads and Streets Manual(BLRS),Chapter 14. For signature requirements refer to Chapter 2,Section 3.05(b)of the BLRS Manual. Submittal Type From the drop down,choose Original(being submitted for the first time), Revised(revising a previously approved submittal),or Supplemental(addition to estimate(s)already approved). Local Public Agency Insert the name of the municipality. County Insert the name of the County in which the municipality is located. Maintenance Period Beginning Insert the beginning date of the maintenance period.This must be 12 or 24 consecutive months.The dates must match those on the resolution. Ending Insert the ending date of the maintenance period,following the above guidelines. Estimated Cost of Maintenance Operations To aid in determining quantities for maintenance operations,the LPA may develop their own spreadsheet containing the following information. IDOT does not provide a form for this purpose. Location Surface Maintenance Operation Street/Road From To Existing Type Length Width No. Description Unit Quantity Maintenance Operations List each maintenance operations with a consecutive operation number. If an operation is not listed MFT funds cannot be expended for that operation. Maint. Engineering Group From the drop down,select the group number that applies to the maintenance operation to be performed.All maintenance operations shall require one of the following group designations. 1.Group I.Services purchased without a proposal such as electrical energy or materials purchased from Central Management Services'Joint Purchasing Program(www.purchase.state.il.us)or another joint purchasing program that has been approved by the District BLRS or Central BLRS. 2.Group II-A.Routine maintenance or maintenance items that do not require competitive sealed bids according to section 12-1.02(a)or local ordinance/resolution. 3.Group II-B. Routine maintenance items that require competitive sealed bids according to Section 12-1.02(a)or a local ordinance/resolution. Routine maintenance includes all items in the following work categories:snow removal,street sweeping,lighting and traffic signal maintenance,cleaning ditches or drainage structures,tree trimming or removal, mowing,crack sealing, pavement marking,shoulder maintenance, limited amounts of CC&G repair,scour mitigation, pavement patching and minor drainage repairs. 4.Group III.Maintenance items that are not covered by Group I or IIB and require competitive bidding with a material proposal or a delivery and install proposal. 5.Group IV. Maintenance items that are not covered by Group I or IIB and require competitive bidding with a contract proposal. Insp Req. From the drop down,select if the operation being performed requires an engineering inspection or N'if the operation does not need an engineering inspection. Item For Groups I, IIA, IIB(not performed by a formal contract),and III type operations list each item to be used in this maintenance operation. For Group IIB items being done by a formal contract and Group IV items list"by contract". Unit For Groups I, IIA, IIB(not performed by a formal contract),and III insert the unit of measure for each listed item. Quantity For Groups I, IIA, IIB(not performed by a formal contract),and III insert the estimated quantity for each listed item. Unit Price For Groups I, IIA, IIB(not performed by a formal contract),and III insert the estimated unit price for each listed item. Item Cost This is a calculated field,no entry is necessary. It calculates the quantity times the unit price. Est.Total Operation Cost For each operation listed, insert the total estimated cost of that operation. Total Estimated Maintenance This is a calculated field,no entry is necessary. It sums all the maintenance operations listed. Operation Cost Printed 01/10/18 BLR 14231(Rev.05/16/17) Estimated Cost of Maintenance Engineering Preliminary Engineering Insert the estimated cost for preliminary engineering.This will be calculated based on the maintenance engineering agreement. Engineering Inspection Insert the estimated cost of engineering inspection.This will be calculated based on the maintenance engineering agreement. Material Testing Insert the estimated cost of material testing,if applicable. Advertising Insert the estimated cost of advertising,if applicable. Bridge Inspections Insert the estimated cost of bridge inspections, if applicable.This will be calculated based on the engineering agreement. Total Estimated Maintenance This is a calculated field, no entry is necessary. It sums all the maintenance engineering costs listed. Engineering Costs Maintenance Program Estimated Costs Estimated Costs For maintenance,insert the total estimated maintenance operation costs. For Maintenance Engineering,this will be automatically inserted based on the estimated engineering costs from the maintenance engineering table.The totals will automatically calculate. MFT Portion For each type insert the MFT funds estimated to be used for that type.The totals will automatically calculate. Other Funds For each type insert the amount of other funds estimated to be used for that type.The totals will automatically calculate. Totals This is a calculate field,no entry is necessary. It sums the total for estimated cost,MFT portion and other funds. Submitted The proper municipal official shall insert their title and date here. Approved Upon approval the Regional Engineer shall sign and date here. A minimum of four(4)signed originals must be submitted to the Regional Engineer's District office. Following the Regional Engineer's approval,distribution will be as follows: Municipal Clerk Engineer(Municipal or Consultant) District Compliance Review District File Printed 01/10/18 BLR 14231 (Rev.05/16/17) ()-()- ()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-)()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()- ()- ()-()-()-()-()- ()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-( )-)()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()- ()- ()-()-()- Madison StMadison CtBridgeSpring Main MillVan Emmon Park Somonauk Center Benjamin OrangeState TeriDeerapl e McHughElm KingOmahaLibertyB a r b e r r y HeustisWashington WackerJackson BruellFreemontBeaverMorganChurchAdrian Ka BristolColonial Madison Coltonhite Oak Blaine F o x b o r o Wolf ked CreekElizabeth BadgerGardenGame FarmAdamsGawneWi n d s o r Ridge Illini Wooden BridgeOlsenWest Walter Martin Wood SaWoodworthDolph WorsleyHydraulic Woodland AuburnSandersOakwoodTowerDydyna R Behrens Marie SpruceBellOx f o r d JohnsonBatorTomasikVictoria Beecher Appletree Rodak Buck t hor n JeffersonB u h r ma s t e r Spicebush Wooddale StateRidge MainDolph MainS c h o ol h o u s eMorganMainHydraulic Legend 2018 RTBR PROGRAM ()-()-()- ( )-()-()-()-TimberCreek ArcadiaPavillion LegionHighview Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 (630) 466-6700 PROPOSED 2018 RTBR PROGRAM LOCATION MAP www.eeiweb.com DATE: PROJECT NO.: FILE: PATH: BY: September 2017 YO1739 YO1739_2018 Road Program .MXD H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2017\ MJT United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 630-553-4350 ³IL Route 71 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #6 Tracking Number PW 2018-06 Letter of Support, Funding for IL 47 Improvements Public Works Committee - January 16, 2018 N/A Majority Approval Review of Letter of Support to IDOT for funding for the intersection improvement at IL Route 47 and Galena Road and the expansion of the IL Route 47 corridor. Erin Willrett Administration Name Department Summary Review of Letter of Support to IDOT for funding for the intersection improvement at Illinois Route 47 and Galena Road as well as the expansion of Northern Illinois Route 47 corridor. Background The state of the roadway of the northern section of the IL 47 corridor and safety concerns regarding the intersection of IL 47 and Galena Road was discussed under additional business at the January 4, 2018 Public Safety Committee meeting. Attached is a letter of support to IDOT concerning funding for the intersection improvement at IL 47 and Galena Road as well as the expansion of the northern IL 47 corridor. This project will promote safety and efficient traffic flow north and south within the region. Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council approve the letter of support for funding for the future IL Route 47 roadway improvements. Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator CC: Date: January 16, 2018 Subject: Letter of Support, Funding for IL 47 Improvements January 23, 2018 Illinois Department of Transportation Attn: Kevin Marchek, Region 2 Engineer 700 East Norris Drive Ottawa, Illinois 61350-0697 Dear Mr. Marchek, As the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) reviews and considers funding for projects, the United City of Yorkville wishes to voice its fullest support for the intersection improvement at Illinois State Route 47 and Galena Road as well as the expansion of the Northern Illinois Route 47 corridor. These projects exemplify facets of smart investments of funds, and will promote safety and efficient traffic flow north and south within the region. The intersection improvement and expansion of the roadway will lead to improved safety measures. Between 2011 and today there have been 150 accidents reported at the intersection of IL Route 47 and Galena Road. Of those 150 accidents, 17 have been personal injury accidents and 1 recent accident resulted in a fatality. At an intersection just to the south, IL Route 47 and Corneils Road, there have been 28 accidents reported. Of those 28 reported, 5 were personal injury accidents and 1 was a fatality. Regionally, a roadway that lessens crashes, especially fatal ones, and improves capacity and mobility is desperately needed. Currently, the United City of Yorkville’s residents are limited with roadway capacity and un-improved intersections. Improvements of this scope will increase and enhance public safety and allow IDOT to follow its own policies and standards. According to IDOT policy, the current average daily traffic capacity of a two-lane highway (similar to IL Route 47) should be between 8,500 and 12,500 vehicles. The northern corridor average daily traffic count is between approximately 15,000 and 20,000. Clearly, this number is way beyond policy levels. Currently, IL 47 from County Line Road to South of Kennedy Road in Yorkville is in the FY 2018 – 2023 Highway Improvement Program within District 3. However, only $2,000,000 is programmed for resurfacing and ADA improvements. Full funding for reconstruction is needed along this corridor. We are aware that safety improvements were programmed for the Galena and IL Route 47 intersection in an early IDOT budget and were subsequently removed due to budget cuts. Given the recent accidents at this intersection, we would encourage those improvements to United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 www.yorkville.il.us receive immediate funding while the Route 47 expansion plan is being considered for funding on a longer term. In summary, this project will have far-reaching impact beyond the residents of the City. The United City of Yorkville wishes to add its support for funding to move the intersection improvements and overall expansion of the Northern Illinois Route 47 corridor forward. As IDOT moves forward in planning and programming projects, we hope you give the corridor, including the intersection of IL Route 47 and Galena Road your full consideration and support for additional lanes, reconstruction and ADA improvements. Sincerely, Gary J. Golinski Mayor, United City of Yorkville cc: Randall S. Blankenhorn, Illinois Transportation Secretary i4 STATE OF ILLINOIS ss COUNTY OF KENDALL ) RESOLUTION NO: RESOLUTION TO THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONCERNING ILLINOIS STATE ROUTE 47 Whereas,the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville have determined that there is a need to widen and upgrade Illinois State Route 47,also known as Bridge Street,to maintain a safe and efficient flow of traffic through the City;and Whereas the City recognizes that the issue of the redesign,reconstruction and/or removal of the retaining wall located adjacent to Route 47 in Downtown Yorkville needs to be addressed by the Illinois Department of Transportation; and Whereas the ever increasing use of Route 47 by large and heavy vehicles has caused concern for public safety with the congestion caused by these slower moving vehicles and the lack of hard shoulder in many areas to provide a place for said vehicles to move to in order to allow for the passing of emergency vehicles;and Whereas Route 47 provides the only river crossing within the City making this route very important for the normal movement through the City by its citizens, its public safety personnel, its public works personnel, other city staff and officials,the Fire District and the School District; and Whereas because Route 47 as a major collector and conduit for moving local, regional, intrastate and interstate traffic, continues to experience traffic increases at rates beyond that created by Yorkville's own growth;and Whereas the City has determined that it is also imperative to the economic development of Yorkville to keep traffic flowing efficiently on Rt. 47;and Whereas the City has identified that the improvement of Rt. 47 is imperative to keep traffic flowing efficiently, which is critical to continue attracting the industrial and commercial development required for creating new jobs,retaining existing jobs, and generally strengthening the tax base of the City;and Whereas IDOT has also recognized the need to widen and upgrade Rt. 47, is in the process of completing Phase I engineering for the section of the highway from just south of IL Rt. 71 to just north of Countryside Parkway within Yorkville, and has begun Phase II engineering on that same section;and Whereas the City has concerns that with the amount of traffic already present on Rt. 47 that any further delay in completing said project could have a devastating effect on local businesses and public safety during the construction period and cause major disruption of basic movement though the City: Now therefore be it resolved that the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville strongly recommend and request that IDOT and the State of Illinois use all resources available to expedite the current Rt. 47 project planned in Yorkville to complete construction as soon as possible and work with the City to minimize the impact of said project on local citizens and businesses. Furthermore,the Mayor and City Council strongly recommend and request that IDOT immediately begin the necessary engineering and then construction of widening and upgrading Rt. 47 both north and south of the present project through Kendall County and beyond to I-80 to the south and I-88 to the north. This resolution passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville and authorized by the Mayor this ,-<<4 i day of October,2004. PASSED AND APPROVED this -day of C- ti" 1 , 2004. WANDA OHARE JOSEPH BESCO VALERIE BURD PAUL JAMES LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS G ROSE SPEARS RICHARD STICKA r' YOR CIO z " CITY CLERK i I i Resolution No. 2013- 0 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR STATE FUNDING OF THE NORTHERN ROUTE 47 CORRIDOR I WHEREAS , the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, hereinafter called the CITY, has approved Resolution 2013 - 13 in support of the reallocation of Prairie Parkway earmarked funds from the stretch of Route 47 from Caton Farm Road to 1- 80 , hereinafter called the Southern Route 47 Corridor, to the stretch of Route 47 from Kennedy Road in Yorkville to Cross Street in Sugar Grove, hereinafter called the Northern 47 Corridor; and WHEREAS , it has become apparent that the State does not wish to reallocate the Prairie Parkway earkmarked funds per our request in Resolution 2013 - 13 ; and I WHEREAS , the current IDOT FY 2014-2019 Proposed Multi -Modal Transportation I Improvement program, hereinafter called the IDOT Highway Program , contains design and construction funding for the Southern Route 47 Corridor; and i WHEREAS , the current IDOT Highway Program contains full funding of Phase I engineering costs, half-funding for Phase 11 engineering costs, and no funds for construction of the Northern Route 47 Corridor; and WHEREAS , approximately $ 51 million in unallocated funds remain in the Prairie Parkway earmark; and WHEREAS , the cost of expanding the Northern Route 47 Corridor is estimated at $ 77 million; and i WHEREAS, the Northern Route 47 Corridor contains average daily traffic counts between 75 % and 291 % higher than the average daily traffic counts for the sections of Route 47 between 1- 80 and Caton Farm Road ; and WHEREAS, IDOT ' s own policies state the average daily traffic capacity of a two -lane highway, similar to Route 47, should be between 8 , 500 and 12 , 500 vehicles for safe and efficient operations ; and i WHEREAS, all of the sections of the Northern Route 47 Corridor has an average daily traffic count exceeding the upper end of that safe usage standard, and none of the sections of the Southern Route 47 Corridor have an average daily traffic count that exceeds the lower end of that safe usage standard; and WHEREAS, the Northern Route 47 Corridor had 300 reported crashes between 2007 and 2011 , and the Southern Route 47 Corridor had 97 crashes between 2007 and 2011 ; and I i i I Resolution No. 2013- O Page 1 i WHEREAS , IDOT is holding public hearings throughout the State to take public comment on their IDOT Highway Plan ; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED , by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, that the IDOT Highway Plan should contain funding for all design and construction costs for the Northern Route 47 Corridor. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this i day of 3 64// ,6ei2. A. D . 2013 , bapu-r y CITY CLERK i CARLO COLOSIMO KEN KOCH JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT JOEL FRIEDERS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING 1 Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of S aj E// (Ei2 A . D . 2013 . Loot R i MAYO i i i i I Resolution No. 2013 - KO I Page 2 I Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #7 Tracking Number PW 2018-07 Wyland National Mayors Challenge for Conservation Public Works Committee - January 16, 2018 N/A Majority Approval/Support Intiate participation in a national program to challenge residents to conserve water, Energy and other natural resources Erin Willrett Administration Name Department Summary Initiate participation in a national program to challenge the residents to conserve water, energy and other natural resources, in alignment with City Council Goal #14 – Water Conservation Plan. Background The Wyland Foundation, in partnership with the National League of Cities and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, invited the United City of Yorkville to participate in the 7th annual National Mayor’s Challenge for Water Conservation. The commitment from the City to participate is as simple as drafting the statement of support below, and as complex as marketing the challenge if we’d like. There is no cost to the City. Residents who are interested in conservation efforts and who would like to accept the challenge can go online (www.mywaterpledge.com) and make a pledge to conserve water, energy, and other natural resources over the next year by selecting from different pledge options. Some options are as easy as wasting less food and recycling. When the resident enters their location, the drop down menu for pledges will contain our draft statement about water conservation. Our draft statement will read as: “A sustainable water source for the City’s future water supply is a main focus for our community and its residents. Yorkville currently obtains its water from the deep sandstone aquifer, which is being steadily drawn down as it is being pumped beyond its long-term sustainable yield due to increasing water demands and growth of the region. The City is committed to building strong, collaborative relationships regionally for sustainable water use. We hope to partner with our neighboring communities and our actual neighbors to promote water conservation efforts in the home. By taking the water pledge, you can help extend the capacity of the City’s water supply.” When a resident goes online to accept the challenge, they will search for “Yorkville, IL”, the website will then walk the resident through the process to pledge to make thoughtful conservation choices at home. There are several check boxes that the residents can choose from depending on the changes they are pledging to make. At the end of the “choices” portion of the pledge, an email address is required and the option for the resident to be entered into the prize drawing is made as a check box. After the resident enters their email address the pledge process is complete. Additionally, the website has several informational items for the resident to read through and learn about. City standings in the challenge are on the website and the residents can check back and see how their “choices” positively affect the community. This program is designed to get residents to think about how their choices impact the natural environment and if changes are made, no matter how small, benefits add up quickly. There is no further commitment and no additional information that is needed from the residents other than those listed above. Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: January 16, 2018 Subject: Wyland National Mayors Challenge for Conservation The City will also be posting several items on social media and on our website to promote this challenge. The City’s main goal by promoting this program is to help residents be aware of the importance of the natural resources that are used on a daily basis and the pressing need to protect those precious resources. Recommendation While not a requirement to participate in the program, staff recommends an acknowledgment by the City Council for support of the statement above and participation in marketing the program. This initiative aligns with the City Council Goal #14 – Water Conservation Plan. Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Old Business #1 Tracking Number ADM 2017-70 Building Condition Reports 2017 Public Works Committee - January 16, 2018 N/A N/A N/A Discussion of the Reports from the Building Condition Survey that EMG performed on City-owned structures and facilities. Erin Willrett Administration Name Department Summary Review of 201 West Hydraulic and 131 East from the Building Condition Survey that EMG performed on City-owned structures and facilities. Background EMG’s reports include an assessment of all City-owned buildings, structures and parking facilities (structural frame and building envelope, curtain wall, roofing, plumbing, heating, air conditioning and ventilation, electrical, vertical transportation, life safety/fire protection, interior elements, code inquiries, ADA, and mold). The presentation walks a reader through Report #037 “Parks and Recreation Office, 201 West Hydraulic Avenue” and Report #010 “Riverfront Rental Building, 121 East Hydraulic Avenue Units A, B, & C”. One component of the report is to calculate the immediate repair cost. This was calculated by EMG and represents items that were in disrepair as of the date of the site visit. The description and cost are provided in the Immediate Repairs Report at the beginning of each document. Another important report is the Replacement Reserve Report which spans a 20 year period. This outlines the description, cost and estimates the year that the item will need to be replaced/repaired/maintained. In time, this report will be uploaded to a database for staff to maintain and keep updated when items are programmed and/or completed. Other items to note within the report is the Executive Summary where the general property information is located as well as the site visit date, point of contact and the general systematic condition summary is located. Another major goal of the reports was to calculate the Facility Condition Index (FCI), which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. The FCI ranking is calculated by dividing the cost of the Immediate Repair cost by the cost of the Current Replacement Value. That number is represented by a percentage and that equates to a condition rating from “Good” to “Very Poor”. This FCI was calculated for the current state of the facility and also the 10-year FCI. This rating can be used as a guide for each facility when determining to maintain facilities or to replace facilities. Within the FCI findings page also included is the Current Replacement Value (CRV) and the calculation of the Total Capital Needs. The Total Capital needs is calculated by the cost of the immediate repairs added to the Replacement Reserves. This represents a cost that it will take to maintain the facility over the next 10 years. Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: January 16, 2018 Subject: EMG Building Condition Reports 2017 Other items included in the report are photographs of the facility and certain equipment, a site plan of the facility, an aerial photograph of the facility, ADA checklist, and a pre-visit questionnaire. This is all information relevant to the facility and was used in the creation of the overall report. Recommendation Staff has made recommendations for both City facilities based on the Building Condition Reports. This is informational at this time.  Parks and Recreation Office, 201 West Hydraulic – Continue to Maintain  Riverfront Rental Building, 131 East Hydraulic – Requesting Further Direction from City Council Ykill M iil Fili Yorkville Municipal Facility Condition Assessment ReviewCondition Assessment ReviewFACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT Report #037Parks and Recreation Office201 W Hydraulic Immediate Repairs Report 201 West HydraulicyEMG outlined items that were in disrepair as of the date of the site visit The main item are listed below:of the site visit. The main item are listed below:Backflow Installation- $1,010Sprinkler System Retrofit - $37,594Fire Alarm Install $11 090Fire Alarm Install -$11,090Outlines Item Number ID for more detail in report Page 2 of the report gives description of the immediate irepairAppendix A outlines the pictures of the areas reviewed Immediate Repairs Report201 West Hydraulic Replacement Reserve Report – 20 years201 West HydraulicyChart shows planned repairs/replacements over a 20 year time-frame (Page 3 and 4 of the Report)frame (Page 3 and 4 of the Report)This data will be uploaded to a databaseCreate report and update when items are programmed and/or completedpThis report shows additional projects to be programmed within the next 20 years. Large Items are listed below. Total Escalated Costs = $482,223Parking Lot ReplacementSidewalk ReplacementPlay structure (Pre-School)Air Handler ReplacementpSprinkler SystemFire Alarm System (Replace)Interior Door ReplacementInterior Wall FinishInterior Wall Finish Executive Summary 201 West HydraulicyGeneral Property pyInformationSite Visit Date/Point of ContactBuilding Condition S (P)Summary (Poor) Facility Condition Index (FCI) 201 West HydraulicyIndication of Building’s Overall ConditionOverall ConditionMeasured for Current Year and +10 YearsCurrent =Ratio of Current =Ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to Current Replacement Value10 Year = Ratio of Anticipated Capital Reserve Needs to the 10 Y Rl t VlYear Replacement ValueRating from Very Poor to Good FCI Rating Cont’d 201 West Hydraulic yMetric for Current Year FCI = FairFCI = Immediate Repair ($51 805) / Current Replacement Value ($366 474) = 14 1%FCI Immediate Repair ($51,805) / Current Replacement Value ($366,474) 14.1%Metric for Current Year FCI = Poor10-Year FCI = Replacement Reserves ($482,223) / Current Replacement Value ($366,474) = 61.6% = Very PoorTotal Capital Needs through 2037 (IR + RR) = $277 555Total Capital Needs through 2037 (IR + RR) = $277,555Current Replacement Value (CRV) = $366,474 Important Pictures201 West Hydraulicy Work Completed Since EMG Site Visit201 West HydraulicyParking Lot Paving and Stripingggpg FCA Report #010Riverfront Rental Building131 East Hydraulic Units A, B, & C Immediate Repairs Report 131 East Hydraulic3yTotal Immediate Repair Cost $21,625p,5Page 2 of the ReportCosts Include:Sprinkler System Retrofit $16,517Fire Alarm System Install $4,873 Replacement Reserve Report 131 East Hydraulic3yTotal Deficiency Repair Estimate through 2037 = $240,694P & f th tPages 3 & 4 of the reportCostly Items:Security System ReplacementDi t ib ti P l R l tDistribution Panel ReplacementInterior Lighting System UpgradeSprinkler System UpgradeFire Alarm System InstallFire Alarm System InstallExterior Wall ReplacementCondensing Unit ReplacementInterior Floors ReplacementInterior Ceiling Tile ReplacementFurnace ReplacementWater Heater Replacement FCI 131 East Hydraulic3yPDF Page 7 of the report, page number 2number 2Current Year Metric for FCI = FairCurrent Year FCI = Immediate Repair ($21,625) / Current Replacement Value ($394 326) = Replacement Value ($394,326) = 5.4% = FairMetric for 10-Year FCI = Poor10-Year FCI = Replacement R ($8 66) / C t Reserves ($81,566) / Current Replacement Value ($394,326) = 20.6% = PoorTotal Capital Needs through 2037 (IR RR) $(IR + RR) = $103,191Current Replacement Value (CRV) = $394,326 Important Pictures131 East Hydraulic3y Staff RecommendationsParks and Recreation Building–201 West HydraulicgyImmediate Repairs = $51,805p5,5Replacement Reserves Report (20 year) = $482,223Current Year FCI = 14.1% = Poor410-Year FCI = 61.6% = Very PoorCurrent Replacement Value (CRV) = $366,474p()$3,474Total Capital Needs = $277,555Recommendation = Continue to MaintainWithin TIF District Can use TIF funds for improvements Staff RecommendationsRiverfront Rental Building –131 East Hydraulicg3yImmediate Repairs = $21,625Replacement Reserves Report (20 year) = $240,694Current Year FCI = 5.4% = Fair10-Year FCI = 20.6% = PoorCurrent Replacement Value (CRV) = $394,326Ttl C itl N d $Total Capital Needs = $103,191Recommendation = Requesting Further Direction from City Councilfrom City CouncilRepairs are TIF eligibleNew construction is NOT TIF eligibleg Prepared for: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, Illinois 60560 PREPARED BY: EMG CONTACT: EMG Andrew Hupp 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Senior Engineering Consultant Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 800.733.0660 x6632 800.733.0660 arhupp@emgcorp.com www.EMGcorp.com EMG Project Number: Date of Report: On Site Date: 122700.17R000-011.322 June 30, 2017 May 23, 2017 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition ................................................................ 1 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations ...................................................................... 3 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost .......................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves ............................................................................................................... 4 2. Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Scope .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Personnel Interviewed ................................................................................................................. 6 2.4. Documentation Reviewed ........................................................................................................... 7 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire ........................................................................................................... 7 2.6. Weather Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 7 3. Accessibility and Property Research ................................................................................................. 8 3.1. ADA Accessibility ........................................................................................................................ 8 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone ................................................................ 8 4. Existing Building Assessment ............................................................................................................ 9 4.1. Unit or Space Types .................................................................................................................... 9 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed ...................................................................... 9 5. Site Improvements ............................................................................................................................. 10 5.1. Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 10 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks ................................................................................................ 10 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control .................................................................................... 11 5.4. Topography and Landscaping ................................................................................................... 12 5.5. General Site Improvements ....................................................................................................... 12 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems ............................................................................... 14 6.1. Foundations ............................................................................................................................... 14 6.2. Superstructure ........................................................................................................................... 14 6.3. Roofing ...................................................................................................................................... 14 6.4. Exterior Walls ............................................................................................................................ 15 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs ......................................................................................................... 16 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors ..................................................................................................... 16 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony ...................................................................................................... 16 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems .................................................................................. 17 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) ..................................................... 17 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water ............................................................................. 18 7.3. Building Gas Distribution ........................................................................................................... 19 7.4. Building Electrical ...................................................................................................................... 19 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems .............................................................................. 19 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems ....................................................................................... 20 7.7. Life Support Systems ................................................................................................................ 20 8. Interior Spaces .................................................................................................................................... 21 8.1. Interior Finishes ......................................................................................................................... 21 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment .............................................................................. 22 9. Other Structures ................................................................................................................................. 23 10. Certification ......................................................................................................................................... 24 11. Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 25 PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 1 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition The property information is summarized in the table below. More detailed descriptions may be found in the various sections of the report and in the Appendices. Property Information Address: 201 West Hydraulic Avenue, Yorkville, Kendall, IL 60560 Year Constructed/Renovated: 1985 Current Occupants: City of Yorkville – Parks and Recreation Percent Utilization: 100% Management Point of Contact: City of Yorkville, Mr. Peter Ratos 630.553.8574 phone pratos@yorkville.il.us email Property Type: Office/Day Care Site Area: 0.37 acres Building Area: 4,700 SF Number of Buildings: 1 Number of Stories: 1 Parking Type and Number of Spaces: 17 spaces in open lots Building Construction: Masonry bearing walls and steel-framed roofs Roof Construction: Flat roofs with built-up membrane. Exterior Finishes: Brick Veneer Heating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning: Individual package split-system units Fire and Life/Safety: Hydrants, smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, extinguishers, exit signs, and emergency lights. Dates of Visit: May 23, 2017 On-Site Point of Contact (POC): Scott Sleezer Assessment and Report Prepared by: Paul Prusa Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 2 Systemic Condition Summary Site Fair HVAC Fair Structure Good Plumbing Fair Roof Fair Electrical Fair Vertical Envelope Fair Elevators -- Interiors Good Fire Fair The following bullet points highlight the most significant short term and modernization recommendations:  Installation of a complete fire suppression system  Installation of a complete fire alarm system  Asphalt pavement mill & overlay Generally, the property appears to have been constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained in recent years and is in good overall condition. According to property management personnel, the property has had an active capital improvement expenditure program over the past three years, primarily consisting of new flooring, asphalt pavement seal coating, and interior painting. Supporting documentation was not provided in support of these claims but some of the work is evident. 1.2. F acility Condition Index (FCI) One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate the FCI, which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. Two FCI ratios are calculated and presented, the Current Year and Ten-Year. The Current Year FCI is the ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to the building’s Current Replacement Value. Similarly, the Ten-Year FCI is the ratio of anticipated Capital Reserve Needs over the next ten years to the Current Replacement Value. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 3 Fci Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value Good In new or well-maintained condition, with no visual evidence of wear, soiling or other deficiencies. 0% to 5% Fair Subjected to wear and soiling but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. > than 5% to 10% Poor Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. > than 10% to 60% Very Poor Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal is now necessary. > than 60% The graphs above and tables below represent summary-level findings for the FCA. The deficiencies identified in this assessment can be combined with potential new construction requirements to develop an overall strategy that can serve as the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy. Key findings from the assessment include: Key Finding Metric Current Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (IR)/(CRV) 14.1% Poor 10-Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (RR)/(CRV) 61.6% Very Poor Current Replacement Value (CRV) 4,700 SF * 183.24 / SF = $366,474 Year 0 (Current Year) - Immediate Repairs (IR) $51,805 Years 1-10 – Replacement Reserves (RR) $228,750 Total Capital Needs $277,555 The major issues contributing to the Immediate Repair Costs and the Current Year FCI ratio are summarized below:  Installation of a complete fire suppression system  Installation of a complete fire alarm system Further detail on the specific costs that make up the Immediate Repair Costs can be found in the cost tables at the beginning of this report. 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations As part of the FCA, a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) was performed to determine the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. Property personnel were interviewed concerning any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Sampling is not a part of this assessment. There are no visual indications of the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, or evidence of moisture in representative readily accessible areas of the property. 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost Cost estimates are attached at the front of this report (following the cover page). These estimates are based on Invoice or Bid Document/s provided either by the Owner/facility and construction costs developed by construction resources such as R.S. Means and Marshall & Swift, EMG’s experience with past costs for similar properties, city cost indexes, and assumptions regarding future economic conditions. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 4 Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary, order of magnitude budgets. Actual costs most probably will vary from the consultant’s opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy, quality of materials and installation, manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected, field conditions, whether a physical deficiency is repaired or replaced in whole, phasing of the work (if applicable), quality of contractor, quality of project management exercised, market conditions, and whether competitive pricing is solicited, etc. ASTM E2018-08 recognizes that certain opinions of probable costs cannot be developed within the scope of this guide without further study. Opinions of probable cost for further study should be included in the FCA. 1.4.1. Methodology Based upon site observations, research, and judgment, along with referencing Expected Useful Life (EUL) tables from various industry sources, EMG opines as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement. Accurate historical replacement records, if provided, are typically the best source of information. Exposure to the elements, initial quality and installation, extent of use, the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised, etc., are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component. As a result, a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual chronological age. The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age. Projections of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) are based on continued use of the Property similar to the reported past use. Significant changes in occupants and/or usage may affect the service life of some systems or components. Where quantities could not be derived from an actual take-off, lump sum costs or allowances are used. Estimated costs are based on professional judgment and the probable or actual extent of the observed defect, inclusive of the cost to design, procure, construct and manage the corrections. 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs Immediate repairs are opinions of probable costs that require immediate action as a result of: (1) material existing or potential unsafe conditions, (2) material building or fire code violations, or (3) conditions that, if not addressed, have the potential to result in, or contribute to, critical element or system failure within one year or will most probably result in a significant escalation of its remedial cost. 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves Replacement Reserves are for recurring probable expenditures, which are not classified as operation or maintenance expenses. The replacement reserves should be budgeted for in advance on an annual basis. Replacement Reserves are reasonably predictable both in terms of frequency and cost. However, Replacement Reserves may also include components or systems that have an indeterminable life but, nonetheless, have a potential for failure within an estimated time period. Replacement Reserves exclude systems or components that are estimated to expire after the reserve term and are not considered material to the structural and mechanical integrity of the subject property. Furthermore, systems and components that are not deemed to have a material effect on the use of the Property are also excluded. Costs that are caused by acts of God, accidents, or other occurrences that are typically covered by insurance, rather than reserved for, are also excluded. Replacement costs are solicited from ownership/property management, EMG’s discussions with service companies, manufacturers' representatives, and previous experience in preparing such schedules for other similar facilities. Costs for work performed by the ownership’s or property management’s maintenance staff are also considered. EMG’s reserve methodology involves identification and quantification of those systems or components requiring capital reserve funds within the assessment period. The assessment period is defined as the effective age plus the reserve term. Additional information concerning system’s or component’s respective replacement costs (in today's dollars), typical expected useful lives, and remaining useful lives were estimated so that a funding schedule could be prepared. The Replacement Reserves Schedule presupposes that all required remedial work has been performed or that monies for remediation have been budgeted for items defined in the Immediate Repair Cost Estimate. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 5 2. Purpose and Scope 2.1. Purpose EMG was retained by the client to render an opinion as to the Property’s current general physical condition on the day of the site visit. Based on the observations, interviews and document review outlined below, this report identifies significant deferred maintenance issues, existing deficiencies, and material code violations of record at municipal offices, which affect the Property’s use. Opinions are rendered as to its structural integrity, building system condition and the Property’s overall condition. The report also notes building systems or components that have realized or exceeded their typical expected useful lives. CONDITIONS: The physical condition of building systems and related components are typically defined as being in one of five conditions: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Failed or a combination thereof. For the purposes of this report, the following definitions are used: Excellent = New or very close to new; component or system typically has been installed within the past year, sound and performing its function. Eventual repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Good = Satisfactory as-is. Component or system is sound and performing its function, typically within the first third of its lifecycle. However, it may show minor signs of normal wear and tear. Repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Fair = Showing signs of wear and use but still satisfactory as-is, typically near the median of its estimated useful life. Component or system is performing adequately at this time but may exhibit some signs of wear, deferred maintenance, or evidence of previous repairs. Repair or replacement will be required due to the component or system’s condition and/or its estimated remaining useful life. Poor = Component or system is significantly aged, flawed, functioning intermittently or unreliably; displays obvious signs of deferred maintenance; shows evidence of previous repair or workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards; has become obsolete; or exhibits an inherent deficiency. The present condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of contiguous elements or systems. Either full component replacement is needed or repairs are required to restore to good condition, prevent premature failure, and/or prolong useful life. Failed = Component or system has ceased functioning or performing as intended. Replacement, repair, or other significant corrective action is recommended or required. Not Applicable = Assigning a condition does not apply or make logical sense, most commonly due to the item in question not being present. FORMAT OF THE BODY OF THE REPORT: Throughout sections 5 through 9 of this report, each report section will typically contain three subsections organized in the following sequence:  A descriptive table (and/or narrative), which identifies the components assessed, their condition, and other key data points.  A simple bulleted list of Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements, which lists components and assets typically in Excellent, Good, or Fair condition at the time of the assessment but that will require replacement or some other attention once aged past their estimated useful life. These listed components are typically included in the associated inventory database with costs identified and budgeted beyond the first several years.  A bulleted cluster of Actions/Comments, which include more detailed narratives describing deficiencies, recommended repairs, and short term replacements. The assets and components associated with these bullets are/were typically problematic and in Poor or Failed condition at the time of the assessment, with corresponding costs included within the first few years. PLAN TYPES: Each line item in the cost database is assigned a Plan Type, which is the primary reason or rationale for the recommended replacement, repair, or other corrective action. This is the “why” part of the equation. A cost or line item may commonly have more than one applicable Plan Type; however, only one Plan Type will be assigned based on the “best” fit, typically the one with the greatest significance. The following Plan Types are listed in general weighted order of importance: PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 6 Safety = An observed or reported unsafe condition that if left unaddressed could result in an injury; a system or component that presents a potential liability risk. Performance/Integrity = Component or system has failed, is almost failing, performs unreliably, does not perform as intended, and/or poses a risk to overall system stability. Accessibility = Does not meet ADA, UFAS, and/or other handicap accessibility requirements. Environmental = Improvements to air or water quality, including removal of hazardous materials from the building or site. Modernization/Adaptation = Conditions, systems, or spaces that need to be upgraded in appearance or function to meet current standards, facility usage, or client/occupant needs. Lifecycle/Renewal = Any component or system in which future repair or replacement is anticipated beyond the next several years and/or is of minimal substantial early-term consequence. 2.2. Scope The standard scope of the Facility Condition Assessment includes the following:  Visit the Property to evaluate the general condition of the building and site improvements, review available construction documents in order to familiarize ourselves with, and be able to comment on, the in-place construction systems, life safety, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and the general built environment.  Identify those components that are exhibiting deferred maintenance issues and provide cost estimates for Immediate Costs and Replacement Reserves based on observed conditions, maintenance history and industry standard useful life estimates. This will include the review of documented capital improvements completed within the last five-year period and work currently contracted for, if applicable.  Provide a full description of the Property with descriptions of in-place systems and commentary on observed conditions.  Provide a general statement of the subject Property’s compliance to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This will not constitute a full ADA survey, but will help identify exposure to issues and the need for further review.  Perform a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) for the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. EMG will also interview Project personnel regarding the presence of any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Potentially affected areas will be photographed. Sampling will not be considered in routine assessments.  List the current utility service providers.  Review maintenance records and procedures with the in-place maintenance personnel.  Observe a representative sample of the interior spaces/units, including vacant spaces/units, in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas to be observed include the exterior of the property, the roofs, interior common areas, and the significant mechanical, electrical and elevator equipment rooms.  Provide an Executive Summary at the beginning of this report.  Prepare a mechanical equipment inventory list. 2.3. Personnel Interviewed The building engineer was interviewed for specific information relating to the physical property, available maintenance procedures, historical performance of key building systems and components, available drawings and other documentation. The following personnel from the facility and government agencies were interviewed in the process of conducting the FCA: Name and Title Organization Phone Number Scott Sleezer Parks and Recreation 630.878.7291 The FCA was performed without the assistance of an onsite Point of Contact (POC). PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 7 2.4. Documentation Reviewed Prior to the FCA, relevant documentation was requested that could aid in the knowledge of the subject property’s physical improvements, extent and type of use, and/or assist in identifying material discrepancies between reported information and observed conditions. The review of submitted documents does not include comment on the accuracy of such documents or their preparation, methodology, or protocol. The Documentation Request Form is provided in Appendix E. Although Appendix E provides a summary of the documents requested or obtained, the following list provides more specific details about some of the documents that were reviewed or obtained during the site visit.  No documents provided. 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire A Pre-Survey Questionnaire was sent to the POC prior to the site visit. The questionnaire is included in Appendix E. 2.6. Weather Conditions May 23, 2017: Raining, with temperatures in the 70s (°F) and winds. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 8 3. Accessibility and Property Research 3.1. ADA Accessibility Generally, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by entities to access and use of “areas of public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” on the basis of disability. Regardless of its age, these areas and facilities must be maintained and operated to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). Buildings completed and occupied after January 26, 1992 are required to comply fully with the ADAAG. Existing facilities constructed prior to this date are held to the lesser standard of compliance to the extent allowed by structural feasibility and the financial resources available. As an alternative, a reasonable accommodation pertaining to the deficiency must be made. During the FCA, a limited visual observation for ADA accessibility compliance was conducted. The scope of the visual observation was limited to those areas set forth in EMG’s Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist provided in Appendix D of this report. It is understood by the Client that the limited observations described herein does not comprise a full ADA Compliance Survey, and that such a survey is beyond the scope of EMG’s undertaking. Only a representative sample of areas was observed and, other than as shown on the Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist, actual measurements were not taken to verify compliance. At a office property, the areas considered as a public accommodation besides the site itself and parking, are the exterior accessible route, the interior accessible route up to the tenant lease lines and the interior common areas, including the common area restrooms. The facility does not appear to be accessible with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Elements as defined by the ADAAG that are not accessible as stated within the priorities of Title III, are as follows: Parking  Adequate number of designated parking stalls and signage for cars are not provided.  Adequate number of designated parking stalls and signage for vans are not provided. Paths of Travel  Add visual alarm to existing audible fire alarm. A full ADA Compliance Survey may reveal additional aspects of the property that are not in compliance. Corrections of these conditions should be addressed from a liability standpoint, but are not necessarily code violations. The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines concern civil rights issues as they pertain to the disabled and are not a construction code, although many local jurisdictions have adopted the Guidelines as such. The cost to address the achievable items noted above is included in the cost tables. 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone Not applicable. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 9 4. Existing Building Assessment 4.1. Unit or Space Types All 4,700 square feet of the building are occupied by a single occupant, City of Yorkville – Parks and Recreation. The spaces a combination of offices, classrooms, supporting restrooms, mechanical, and other utility spaces. 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed The interior spaces were observed in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas accessed included the site within the property boundaries, exterior of the property and the roof. Areas of note that were either inaccessible or not observed for other reasons are listed in the table below: Key Spaces Not Observed Room Number Area Access Issues -- Roof Requires a ladder but due to rain it was unsafe to climb metal ladder. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 10 5. Site Improvements 5.1. Utilities The following table identifies the utility suppliers and the condition and adequacy of the services. Site Utilities Utility Supplier Condition and Adequacy Sanitary sewer City of Yorkville Good Storm sewer City of Yorkville Good Domestic water City of Yorkville Good Electric service Commonwealth Edison Good Natural gas service Nicor Gas Good Actions/Comments:  According to the occupants, the utilities provided are adequate for the property. There are no unique, onsite utility systems such as emergency electrical generators, septic systems, water or waste water treatment plants, or propane gas tanks. 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks Item Description Main Ingress and Egress Hydraulic Avenue Access from South Additional Entrances -- Additional Access from -- Paving and Flatwork Item Material Last Work Done Condition Entrance Driveway Apron Asphalt >20 Fair Parking Lot Asphalt >20 Poor Drive Aisles Asphalt >20 Poor Service Aisles None -- -- Sidewalks Concrete Approx. 20 Fair Curbs None -- -- Site Stairs None -- -- Pedestrian Ramps Cast-in-place concrete Approx. 20 Fair PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 11 Parking Count Open Lot Carport Private Garage Subterranean Garage Freestanding Parking Structure 17 -- -- -- -- Total Number of ADA Compliant Spaces 0 Number of ADA Compliant Spaces for Vans 0 Total Parking Spaces 17 Parking Ratio (Spaces/Apartments) -- Method of Obtaining Parking Count Physical count Exterior Stairs Location Material Handrails Condition None -- -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Asphalt seal coating  Asphalt pavement  Sidewalks  Pedestrian ramps Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control Drainage System and Erosion Control System Exists At Site Condition Surface Flow ☒ Fair Inlets ☐ -- Swales ☐ -- Detention pond ☐ -- Lagoons ☐ -- Ponds ☐ -- Underground Piping ☐ -- Pits ☐ -- Municipal System ☐ -- Dry Well ☐ -- PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 12 Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  There is no evidence of storm water runoff from adjacent properties. The storm water system appears to provide adequate runoff capacity. There is no evidence of major ponding or erosion. 5.4. Topography and Landscaping Item Description Site Topography Slopes gently down towards the adjacent river. Landscaping Trees Grass Flower Beds Planters Drought Tolerant Plants Decorative Stone None ☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ Landscaping Condition Good Irrigation Automatic Underground Drip Hand Watering None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Irrigation Condition -- Retaining Walls Type Location Condition None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The topography and adjacent uses do not appear to present conditions detrimental to the property. There are no significant areas of erosion. 5.5. General Site Improvements Property Signage Property Signage Building mounted Street Address Displayed? Yes PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 13 Site and Building Lighting Site Lighting None Pole Mounted Bollard Lights Ground Mounted Parking Lot Pole Type ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ -- Building Lighting None Wall Mounted Recessed Soffit ☐ ☒ ☒ Fair Site Fencing Type Location Condition Stained wood board and posts Rear lot Fair Chain link with metal posts Rear lot Fair REFUSE DISPOSAL Refuse Disposal Common area dumpsters Dumpster Locations Mounting Enclosure Contracted? Condition Left side of building Asphalt paving Wood board fence Yes Fair Other Site Amenities Description Location Condition Playground Equipment Plastic and metal Rear lot Good Tennis Courts None -- -- Basketball Court None -- -- Swimming Pool None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Exterior lighting  Site fencing  Playground equipment  Playground surfaces Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 14 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems 6.1. Foundations Building Foundation Item Description Condition Foundation Masonry foundation walls Good Basement and Crawl Space None -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The foundation systems are concealed. There are no significant signs of settlement, deflection, or movement. 6.2. Superstructure Building Superstructure Item Description Condition Framing / Load-Bearing Walls Masonry walls Good Ground Floor Concrete slab Good Upper Floor Framing -- -- Upper Floor Decking -- -- Roof Framing Steel beams or girders Good Roof Decking Metal decking Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The superstructure is exposed in some locations, which allows for limited observation. Walls and floors appear to be plumb, level, and stable. There are no significant signs of deflection or movement. 6.3. Roofing Primary Roof Type / Geometry Flat Finish Built-up membrane PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 15 Primary Roof Maintenance Outside Contractor Roof Age Approximately 20 Yrs Flashing Built-up base and Edge flashing Warranties No Parapet Copings Pre-cast Concrete Roof Drains Internal drains Fascia None Insulation Rigid Board Soffits Exposed Soffits Skylights No Attics None Ponding Unknown Ventilation Source-1 None Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 -- Roof Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Built-up roof membrane  Roof flashings (included as part of overall membrane replacement)  Parapet wall copings (included as part of overall membrane replacement) Actions/Comments:  The roof finishes appear to be more than 20 years old. Information regarding roof warranties or bonds was not available.  According to the POC, there are no active roof leaks. Roof leaks have occurred in the past year. The leaks have since been repaired, and no active roof leaks are evident  There is no evidence of roof deck or insulation deterioration. The roof substrate and insulation should be inspected during any future roof repair or replacement work.  Roof drainage appears to be adequate. Clearing and minor repair of drain system components should be performed regularly as part of the property management’s routine maintenance and operations program. 6.4. Exterior Walls Building Exterior Walls Type Location Condition Primary Finish Brick veneer Good Secondary Finish Metal siding Fair Accented with Pre-cast concrete Good Soffits Exposed Fair Building sealants (caulking) are located between dissimilar materials, at joints, and around window and door openings. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Metal siding PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 16 Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance, including patching repairs, graffiti removal, and re-caulking, is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs Not applicable. There are no exterior or interior stairs. 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors Building Windows Window Framing Glazing Location Window Screen Condition Aluminum framed storefront Double glaze Front elevation ☐ Fair Aluminum framed, operable Single glaze Exterior walls ☐ Poor Building Doors Main Entrance Doors Door Type Condition Fully glazed, metal framed Fair Secondary Entrance Doors Metal, insulated Fair Service Doors Metal, insulated Fair Overhead Doors None -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Windows  Storefront glazing  Exterior doors Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony Not applicable. There are no patios, terraces, or balconies. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 17 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems See the Mechanical Equipment List in the Appendices for the quantity, manufacturer’s name, model number, capacity and year of manufacturer of the major mechanical equipment, if available. 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Individual Units Primary Components Split system furnaces and condensing units Cooling (if separate from above) performed via components above Quantity and Capacity Ranges 2 units at 5 tons each Total Heating or Cooling Capacity 10 tons Heating Fuel Natural gas Location of Equipment Mechanical rooms Space Served by System Entire building Age Ranges Vary from 2000 to 2014 Primary Component Condition Good to Fair Controls and Ventilation HVAC Control System Individual programmable thermostats/controls HVAC Control System Condition Good Building Ventilation Roof top exhaust fans Ventilation System Condition Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Split system furnaces and condensing units  Rooftop exhaust fans Actions/Comments:  The HVAC systems are maintained by the in-house maintenance staff.  The HVAC equipment varies in age. HVAC equipment is replaced on an "as needed" basis.  The HVAC equipment appears to be functioning adequately overall. However, due to the inevitable failure of parts and components over time, the equipment will require replacement. A budgetary cost for this work is included. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 18 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water Building Plumbing System Type Description Condition Water Supply Piping Copper Fair Waste/Sewer Piping Cast iron Fair Vent Piping PVC Fair Water Meter Location Mechanical room Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Components Water Heater Fuel Natural gas Quantity and Input Capacity 1 unit at 32,000 BTUH Storage Capacity 40 gallons Boiler or Water Heater Condition Fair Supplementary Storage Tanks? No Storage Tank Quantity & Volume -- Quantity of Storage Tanks -- Storage Tank Condition -- Domestic Hot Water Circulation Pumps (3 HP and over) No Adequacy of Hot Water Adequate Adequacy of Water Pressure Adequate Plumbing Fixtures Water Closets Commercial Toilet (Water Closet) Flush Rating 1.6 GPF Common Area Faucet Nominal Flow Rate 2.0 GPM Condition Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Water heater  Toilets  Urinals  Sink  Lavatory Actions/Comments:  The plumbing systems appear to be well maintained and functioning adequately. The water pressure appears to be sufficient. No significant repair actions or short term replacement costs are required. Routine and periodic maintenance is recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components or systems listed above will be required. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 19 7.3. Building Gas Distribution Gas service is supplied from the gas main on the adjacent public street. The gas meter and regulator are located along the exterior wall of the building. The gas distribution piping within the building is malleable steel (black iron). Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The pressure and quantity of gas appear to be adequate.  The gas meter and regulator appear to be functioning adequately and will require routine maintenance.  Only limited observation of the gas distribution piping can be made due to hidden conditions. 7.4. Building Electrical Building Electrical Systems Electrical Lines Overhead Transformer Pole-mounted Main Service Size 200 Amps Volts 120/208 Volt, three-phase Meter & Panel Location Rear elevation Branch Wiring Copper Conduit Metallic Step-Down Transformers? No Security / Surveillance System? No Building Intercom System? No Lighting Fixtures T-8 Main Distribution Condition Fair Secondary Panel and Transformer Condition -- Lighting Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Circuit breaker panels  Interior light fixtures Actions/Comments:  The onsite electrical systems up to the meters are owned and maintained by the respective utility company.  The electrical service and capacity appear to be adequate for the property’s demands.  The panels are original 1985 components. The electrical service is reportedly adequate for the facility’s needs. However, due to the age of the panels and increasing difficulty of obtaining replacement parts over time, lifecycle replacements are recommended per above. 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems Not applicable. There are no elevators or conveying systems. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 20 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems Item Description Type None Fire Alarm System Central Alarm Panel ☐ Battery-Operated Smoke Detectors ☒ Alarm Horns ☐ Annunciator Panels ☐ Hard-Wired Smoke Detectors ☐ Strobe Light Alarms ☐ Pull Stations ☐ Emergency Battery-Pack Lighting ☒ Illuminated EXIT Signs ☒ Alarm System Condition Fair Sprinkler System None ☒ Standpipes ☐ Backflow Preventer ☐ Hose Cabinets ☐ Fire Pumps ☐ Siamese Connections ☐ Suppression Condition -- Central Alarm Panel System Location of Alarm Panel Installation Date of Alarm Panel -- -- Fire Extinguishers Last Service Date Servicing Current? May 2017 Yes Hydrant Location Hydraulic Avenue Siamese Location -- Special Systems Kitchen Suppression System ☐ Computer Room Suppression System ☐ Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The building is not protected by fire suppression. Due to its construction date, the facility is most likely “grandfathered” by code and the installation of fire sprinklers not required until major renovations are performed. Regardless of when or if installation of facility- wide fire suppression is required by the governing municipality, EMG recommends a retrofit be performed. A budgetary cost is included.  The fire alarm systems appear somewhat antiquated and not up to current standards. There is a lack of strobes, audio alarms, insufficient pull stations, and system not fully addressable. Due to the age of the components and apparent shortcomings, a full modernization project is recommended. A budgetary cost is included. 7.7. Life Support Systems Not applicable. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 21 8. I nterior Spaces 8.1. I nterior Finishes The facility is used as a pre-school and an office building for the Department of Parks and Recreation. The most significant interior spaces include classrooms and offices. Supporting areas include restrooms, storage rooms, and mechanical rooms. The following table generally describes the locations and typical conditions of the interior finishes within the facility: Typical Floor Finishes Floor Finish Locations General Condition Carpet Offices and classrooms Fair Vinyl tile Mechanical room Fair Ceramic tile Lobby and restrooms Good Typical Wall Finishes Wall Finish Locations General Condition Painted drywall Throughout the building Fair Painted CMU Throughout the building Fair Typical Ceiling Finishes Ceiling Finish Locations General Condition Suspended T-bar (Acoustic) Throughout the building Fair Painted drywall Restrooms Fair Exposed structure Storage room Poor Interior Doors Item Type Condition Interior Doors Hollow core wood & steel Fair Door Framing Metal Fair Fire Doors Yes Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Carpet  Vinyl tile  Ceramic tile  Interior paint PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 22  Suspended acoustic ceiling tile  Interior doors  Kitchenette appliances Actions/Comments:  The interior areas were last renovated in past 5 years.  The ceiling tiles have isolated areas of water-damaged ceilings. The damaged ceiling tiles need to be replaced. The cost to replace the damaged finishes is relatively insignificant and the work can be performed as part of the property management’s routine maintenance program.  Paint on the exposed structure is worn and chipping in the storage room. 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment Not applicable. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 23 9. Other Structures Not applicable. There are no major accessory structures. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 24 10. Certification City of Yorkville retained EMG to perform this Facility Condition Assessment in connection with its continued operation of Park and Recreation Office, 201 West Hydraulic Avenue, Yorkville, IL, the “Property”. It is our understanding that the primary interest of City of Yorkville is to locate and evaluate materials and building system defects that might significantly affect the value of the property and to determine if the present Property has conditions that will have a significant impact on its continued operations. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the brief review of the plans and records made available to our Project Manager during the site visit, interviews of available property management personnel and maintenance contractors familiar with the Property, appropriate inquiry of municipal authorities, our Project Manager’s walk-through observations during the site visit, and our experience with similar properties. No testing, exploratory probing, dismantling or operating of equipment or in depth studies were performed unless specifically required under Section 2 of this report. This assessment did not include engineering calculations to determine the adequacy of the Property’s original design or existing systems. Although walk-through observations were performed, not all areas were observed (See Section 4.2 for areas observed). There may be defects in the Property, which were in areas not observed or readily accessible, may not have been visible, or were not disclosed by management personnel when questioned. The report describes property conditions at the time that the observations and research were conducted. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for the use of City of Yorkville for the purpose stated within Section 2 of this report. The report, or any excerpt thereof, shall not be used by any party other than City of Yorkville or for any other purpose than that specifically stated in our agreement or within Section 2 of this report without the express written consent of EMG. Any reuse or distribution of this report without such consent shall be at City of Yorkville and the recipient’s sole risk, without liability to EMG. Prepared by: Paul Prusa P.E., LEED AP Project Manager Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical Report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 25 11. Appendices Appendix A: Photographic Record Appendix B: Site Plan Appendix C: Supporting Documentation Appendix D: EMG Accessibility Checklist Appendix E: Pre-Survey Questionnaire PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 Appendix A: Photographic Record Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #1: FRONT ELEVATION #2: RIGHT ELEVATION #3: LEFT ELEVATION #4: REAR ELEVATION #5: PARKING LOTS, ASPHALT PAVEMENT #6: SIDEWALK, CLAY BRICK/MASONRY PAVERS Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #7: PEDESTRIAN PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, CONCRETE #8: FENCES & GATES, WOOD BOARD #9: FENCES & GATES, CHAIN LINK #10: PLAY STRUCTURE, PRE- SCHOOL #11: EXTERIOR WALL, ALUMINUM SIDING #12: EXTERIOR DOOR, FULLY- GLAZED ALUMINUM-FRAMED SWINGING MOTOR-OPERATED Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #13: EXTERIOR DOOR, STEEL #14: STOREFRONT, METAL-FRAMED WINDOWS #15: WINDOW, ALUMINUM DOUBLE- GLAZED AWNING #16: WINDOW, ALUMINUM DOUBLE- GLAZED, SMALL #17: CONDENSING UNIT, SPLIT SYSTEM #18: AIR HANDLER, INTERIOR Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #19: TOILET, TANKLESS (WATER CLOSET) #20: LAVATORY, VITREOUS CHINA #21: SINK, STAINLESS STEEL #22: WATER HEATER, GAS #23: LIGHTING SYSTEM, INTERIOR #24: METAL HALIDE LIGHTING FIXTURE Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #25: HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LIGHTING FIXTURE #26: COMPACT FLUORESCENT LIGHTING FIXTURE #27: MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL #28: FIRE EXTINGUISHER #29: EMERGENCY/EXIT COMBO #30: KITCHEN CABINET, BASE AND WALL SECTION, WOOD Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #31: INTERIOR DOOR, STEEL #32: INTERIOR DOOR, WOOD HOLLOW-CORE #33: INTERIOR DOOR, BI-FOLD #34: INTERIOR DOOR, FULLY-GLAZED ALUMINUM-FRAMED SWINGING #35: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, PAINTED STRUCTURE #36: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, CMU Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #37: INTERIOR WALL FINISH, GYPSUM BOARD #38: INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, ACOUSTICAL TILE (ACT) #39: STAINED ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE #40: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, CERAMIC TILE #41: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, VINYL TILE (VCT) #42: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, CARPET STANDARD- COMMERCIAL MEDIUM-TRAFFIC Park & Rec Office 201 West Hydraulic Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-011.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 #43: INTERIOR WINDOW #44: RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES, REFRIGERATOR #45: INTERIOR DOOR, FIRE 90- MINUTES AND OVER #46: INTERIOR DOOR, FULLY-GLAZED WOOD-FRAMED #47: STORAGE SHED PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 Appendix B: Site Plan Site Plan Project Name: Park & Rec Office Project Number: 122700.17R000-011.322 Source: Google Maps On-Site Date: May 23, 2017 PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 Appendix C: Supporting Documentation www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 THIS APPENDIX INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 Appendix D: EMG Accessibility Checklist Page 1 of 4 Date Completed: June 30, 2017 Property Name: Park & Rec Office EMG Project Number: 122700.17R000-011.322 Building History Yes No Unk Comments 1 Has an ADA survey previously been completed for this property? X 2 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? X 3 Does a Transition Plan / Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? X 4 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints that have not been resolved? X 5 Is any litigation pending related to ADA issues? X Parking Yes No NA Comments 1 Are there sufficient accessible parking spaces with respect to the total number of reported spaces? X 2 Are there sufficient van-accessible parking spaces available? X 3 Are accessible spaces marked with the International Symbol of Accessibility? Are there signs reading “Van Accessible” at van spaces? X 4 Is there at least one accessible route provided within the boundary of the site from public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones, if provided, and public streets and sidewalks? X 5 Do curbs on the accessible route have depressed, ramped curb cuts at drives, paths, and drop-offs? X 6 If required does signage exist directing you to accessible parking and an accessible building entrance? X Ramps Yes No NA Comments 1* Do all ramps along accessible path of travel appear to meet slope requirements? ( 1:12 or less) X 2 Are ramps that appear longer than 6 ft complete with railings on both sides? X Page 2 of 4 Ramps (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 3 Does the width between railings appear at least 36 inches? X 4 Is there a level landing for approximately every 30 ft horizontal length of ramp, at the top and at the bottom of ramps and switchbacks? X Entrances/Exits Yes No NA Comments 1 Do all required accessible entrance doorways appear at least 32 inches wide and not a revolving door? X 2 If the main entrance is inaccessible, are there alternate accessible entrances? X 3 Is the door hardware easy to operate (lever/push type hardware, no twisting required and not higher than approximately 48 inches above the floor)? X Paths of Travel Yes No NA Comments 1 Are all paths of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair (appear at least 36 inches wide)? X 2 Are wheelchair-accessible facilities (toilet rooms, exits, etc.) identified with signage? X 3 Is there a path of travel that does not require the use of stairs? X Elevators Yes No NA Comments 1 Do the call buttons have visual and audible signals to indicate when a call is registered and answered when car arrives? X 2 Are there visual and audible signals inside cars indicating floor change? X 3 Are there standard raised and Braille marking on both jambs of each hoist way entrance as well as all cab/call buttons? X Page 3 of 4 Elevators (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 4 Do elevator doors have a reopening device that will stop and reopen a car door if an object or a person obstructs the door? X 5 Are elevator controls low enough to be reached from a wheelchair (appears to be between 15 and 48 inches)? X 6 If a two-way emergency communication system is provided within the elevator cab, is it usable without voice communication? X Toilet Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 Are common area public restrooms located on an accessible route? X 2 Are pull handles push/pull or lever type? X 3 Are there audible and visual fire alarm devices in the toilet rooms? X 4 Are toilet room access doors wheelchair- accessible (appear to be at least 32 inches wide)? X Toilet Rooms (cont.) Yes No NA Comments 5 Are public restrooms large enough to accommodate a wheelchair turnaround (appear to have 60” turning diameter)? X 6 In unisex toilet rooms, are there safety alarms with pull cords? X 7 Are toilet stall doors wheelchair accessible (appear to be at least 32” wide)? X 8 Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? X 9 Are sinks provided with clearance for a wheelchair to roll under (appear to have 29” clearance)? X 10 Are sink handles operable with one hand without grasping, pinching or twisting? X 11 Are exposed pipes under sink sufficiently insulated against contact? X Page 4 of 4 Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 How many total accessible sleeping rooms does the property management report to have? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible sleeping rooms with respect to the total number of reported guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X 2 How many of the accessible sleeping rooms per property management have roll- in showers? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible rooms with roll-in showers with respect to the total number of reported accessible guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X 3 How many assistive listening kits and/or rooms with communication features are available per property management? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported assistive listening devices with respect to the total number of rooms? See attached hot sheet. X Pools Yes No NA Comments 1 Are public access pools provided? If the answer is no, please disregard this section. X 2 How many accessible access points are provided to each pool/spa? Provide number in comment field. Is at least one fixed lift or sloped entry to the pool provided? X Play Area Yes No NA Comments 1 Has the play area been reviewed for accessibility? All public playgrounds are subject to ADAAG standards. X Exercise Equipment Yes No NA Comments 1 Does there appear to be adequate clear floor space around the machines/equipment (30” by 48” minimum)? X *Based on visual observation only. The slope was not confirmed through measurements. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 Appendix E: Pre-Survey Questionnaire 1 PP RR OO PP EE RR TT YY CC OO NN DD II TT II OO NN AA SS SS EE SS SS MM EE NN TT :: PP RR EE --SS UU RR VV EE YY QQ UU EE SS TT II OO NN NN AA II RR EE This questionnaire must be completed by the property owner, the owner's designated representative, or someone knowledgeable about the subject property. The completed form must be presented to EMG's Field Observer on the day of the site visit. If the form is not completed, EMG’s Project Manager will require additional time during the on-site visit with such a knowledgeable person in order to complete the questionnaire. During the site visit, EMG's Field Observer may ask for details associated with selected questions. This questionnaire will be utilized as an exhibit in EMG's final Property Condition Report. Name of person completing questionnaire: Association with property: Length of association with property: Date Completed: Phone Number: Property Name: EMG Project Number: Directions: Please answer all questions to the best of your knowledge and in good faith. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. INSPECTIONS DATE LAST INSPECTED LIST ANY OUTSTANDING REPAIRS REQUIRED 1 Elevators 2 HVAC, Mechanical, Electric, Plumbing 3 Life-Safety/Fire 4 Roofs QUESTION RESPONSE 5 List any major capital improvement within the last three years. 6 List any major capital expenditures planned for the next year. 7 What is the age of the roof(s)? 8 What building systems (HVAC, roof, interior/exterior finishes, paving, etc.) are the responsibilities of the tenant to maintain and replace? 2 Mark the column corresponding to the appropriate response. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. (NA indicates “Not Applicable”, Unk indicates “Unknown”) QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENTS Y N Unk NA 9 Are there any unresolved building, fire, or zoning code issues? 10 Are there any "down" or unusable units? 11 Are there any problems with erosion, stormwater drainage or areas of paving that do not drain? 12 Is the property served by a private water well? 13 Is the property served by a private septic system or other waste treatment systems? 14 Are there any problems with foundations or structures? 15 Is there any water infiltration in basements or crawl spaces? 16 Are there any wall, or window leaks? 17 Are there any roof leaks? 18 Is the roofing covered by a warranty or bond? 19 Are there any poorly insulated areas? 20 Is Fire Retardant Treated (FRT) plywood used? 21 Is exterior insulation and finish system (EIFS) or a synthetic stucco finish used? 22 Are there any problems with the utilities, such as inadequate capacities? 23 Are there any problems with the landscape irrigation systems? 24 Has a termite/wood boring insect inspection been performed within the last year? 25 Do any of the HVAC systems use R-11, 12, or 22 refrigerants? 26 Has any part of the property ever contained visible suspect suspect fungal growth growth? 3 Mark the column corresponding to the appropriate response. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. (NA indicates “Not Applicable”, Unk indicates “Unknown”) QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENTS Y N Unk NA 27 Is there a suspect fungal growth Operations and Maintenance Plan? 28 Have there been indoor air quality or suspect fungal growth related complaints from tenants? 29 Is polybutylene piping used? 30 Are there any plumbing leaks or water pressure problems? 31 Are there any leaks or pressure problems with natural gas service? 32 Does any part of the electrical system use aluminum wiring? 33 Do Residential units have a less than 60-Amp service? 34 Do Commercial units have less than 200-Amp service? 35 Are there any recalled fire sprinkler heads (Star, GEM, Central, Omega)? 36 Is there any pending litigation concerning the property? 37 Has the management previously completed an ADA review? 38 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? 39 Does a Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? 40 Has the Barrier Removal Plan been approved by an arms-length third party? 41 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints? 42 Does elevator equipment require upgrades to meet ADA standards? 43 Are there any problems with exterior lighting? 44 Are there any other significant issues/hazards with the property? 4 Mark the column corresponding to the appropriate response. Please provide additional details in the Comments column, or backup documentation for any Yes responses. (NA indicates “Not Applicable”, Unk indicates “Unknown”) QUESTION RESPONSE COMMENTS Y N Unk NA 45 Are there any unresolved construction defects at the property? _______________________________________________________________________________ Signature of person Interviewed or completing form Date 5 PP RR OO PP EE RR TT YY CC OO NN DD II TT II OO NN AA SS SS EE SS SS MM EE NN TT :: DD OO CC UU MM EE NN TT RR EE QQ UU EE SS TT On the day of the site visit, provide EMG's Field Observer access to all of the available documents listed below. Provide copies if possible. Your timely compliance with this request is greatly appreciated.  All available construction documents (blueprints) for the original construction of the building or for any tenant improvement work or other recent construction work.  A site plan, preferably 8 1/2" X 11", which depicts the arrangement of buildings, roads, parking stalls, and other site features.  For commercial properties, provide a tenant list which identifies the names of each tenant, vacant tenant units, the floor area of each tenant space, and the gross and net leasable area of the building(s).  For apartment properties, provide a summary of the apartment unit types and apartment unit type quantities, including the floor area of each apartment unit as measured in square feet.  For hotel or nursing home properties, provide a summary of the room types and room type quantities.  Copies of Certificates of Occupancy, building permits, fire or health department inspection reports, elevator inspection certificates, roof or HVAC warranties, or any other similar, relevant documents.  The names of the local utility companies which serve the property, including the water, sewer, electric, gas, and phone companies.  The company name, phone number, and contact person of all outside vendors who serve the property, such as mechanical contractors, roof contractors, fire sprinkler or fire extinguisher testing contractors, and elevator contractors.  A summary of recent (over the last 5 years) capital improvement work which describes the scope of the work and the estimated cost of the improvements. Executed contracts or proposals for improvements. Historical costs for repairs, improvements, and replacements.  Records of system & material ages (roof, MEP, paving, finishes, and furnishings).  Any brochures or marketing information.  Appraisal, either current or previously prepared.  Current occupancy percentage and typical turnover rate records (for commercial and apartment properties).  Previous reports pertaining to the physical condition of property.  ADA survey and status of improvements implemented.  Current / pending litigation related to property condition. PARK & REC OFFICE EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-011.322 On the day of the site visit, provide EMG's Field Observer access to all of the available documents listed below. Provide copies if possible. INFORMATION REQUIRED 1. All available construction documents (blueprints) for the original construction of the building or for any tenant improvement work or other recent construction work. 2. A site plan, preferably 8 1/2" X 11", which depicts the arrangement of buildings, roads, parking stalls, and other site features. 3. For commercial properties, provide a tenant list which identifies the names of each tenant, vacant tenant units, the floor area of each tenant space, and the gross and net leasable area of the building(s). 4. For apartment properties, provide a summary of the apartment unit types and apartment unit type quantities, including the floor area of each apartment unit as measured in square feet. 5. For hotel or nursing home properties, provide a summary of the room types and room type quantities. 6. Copies of Certificates of Occupancy, building permits, fire or health department inspection reports, elevator inspection certificates, roof or HVAC warranties, or any other similar, relevant documents. 7. The names of the local utility companies which serve the property, including the water, sewer, electric, gas, and phone companies. 8. The company name, phone number, and contact person of all outside vendors who serve the property, such as mechanical contractors, roof contractors, fire sprinkler or fire extinguisher testing contractors, and elevator contractors. 9. A summary of recent (over the last 5 years) capital improvement work which describes the scope of the work and the estimated cost of the improvements. Executed contracts or proposals for improvements. Historical costs for repairs, improvements, and replacements. 10. Records of system & material ages (roof, MEP, paving, finishes, furnishings). 11. Any brochures or marketing information. 12. Appraisal, either current or previously prepared. 13. Current occupancy percentage and typical turnover rate records (for commercial and apartment properties). 14. Previous reports pertaining to the physical condition of property. 15. ADA survey and status of improvements implemented. 16. Current / pending litigation related to property condition. Your timely compliance with this request is greatly appreciated. Prepared for: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT Riverfront Rental Building 131 East Hydraulic Avenue Units A, B, C Yorkville, Illinois 60560 PREPARED BY: EMG CONTACT: EMG Andrew Hupp 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100 Senior Engineering Consultant Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 800.733.0660 x6632 800.733.0660 arhupp@emgcorp.com www.EMGcorp.com EMG Project Number: Date of Report: On Site Date: 122700.17R000-010.322 June 13, 2017 May 23, 2017 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT EMG Corporate Headquarters 10461 Mill Run Circle, Suite 1100, Owings Mills, MD 21117 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1  1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition ................................................................ 1  1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) ...................................................................................................... 2  1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations ...................................................................... 3  1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost .......................................................................................................... 3  1.4.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 4  1.4.2. Immediate Repairs ...................................................................................................................... 4  1.4.3. Replacement Reserves ............................................................................................................... 4  2. Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 5  2.1. Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 5  2.2. Scope .......................................................................................................................................... 6  2.3. Personnel Interviewed ................................................................................................................. 6  2.4. Documentation Reviewed ........................................................................................................... 7  2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire ........................................................................................................... 7  2.6. Weather Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 7  3. Accessibility and Property Research ................................................................................................. 8  3.1. ADA Accessibility ........................................................................................................................ 8  3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone ................................................................ 8  4. Existing Building Assessment ............................................................................................................ 9  4.1. Unit or Space Types .................................................................................................................... 9  4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed ...................................................................... 9  5. Site Improvements ............................................................................................................................. 10  5.1. Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 10  5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks ................................................................................................ 10  5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control .................................................................................... 11  5.4. Topography and Landscaping ................................................................................................... 12  5.5. General Site Improvements ....................................................................................................... 12  6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems ............................................................................... 14  6.1. Foundations ............................................................................................................................... 14  6.2. Superstructure ........................................................................................................................... 14  6.3. Roofing ...................................................................................................................................... 14  6.4. Exterior Walls ............................................................................................................................ 16  6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs ......................................................................................................... 16  6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors ..................................................................................................... 16  6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony ...................................................................................................... 17  7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems .................................................................................. 18  7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) ..................................................... 18  7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water ............................................................................. 19  7.3. Building Gas Distribution ........................................................................................................... 20  7.4. Building Electrical ...................................................................................................................... 20  7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems .............................................................................. 20  7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems ....................................................................................... 21  7.7. Life Support Systems ................................................................................................................ 21  8. Interior Spaces .................................................................................................................................... 22  8.1. Interior Finishes ......................................................................................................................... 22  8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment .............................................................................. 23  9. Other Structures ................................................................................................................................. 24  10. Certification ......................................................................................................................................... 25  11. Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 26    RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 1 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 1. Executive Summary 1.1. Property Information and General Physical Condition The property information is summarized in the table below. More detailed descriptions may be found in the various sections of the report and in the Appendices. Property Information Address: 131 E Hydraulic Ave, Yorkville, Kendall, IL 60560 Year Constructed/Renovated: 1970 Current Occupants: Foxy’s Ice Cream Ginger + Soul Percent Utilization: 100% Management Point of Contact: City of Yorkville, Mr. Peter Ratos 630.553.8574 phone pratos@yorkville.il.us email Property Type: Retail Site Area: 0.07 acres Building Area: 2,152 SF Number of Buildings: 1 Number of Stories: 1 Parking Type and Number of Spaces: Parking available in public lot and on street. Public lot included in separate report. Building Construction: Conventional wood frame structure on concrete slab Roof Construction: Gabled roof with metal finish – Ginger + Soul Flat roof with built-up membrane – Foxy’s Ice Cream Exterior Finishes: Vinyl Siding – Ginger + Soul Painted CMU – Foxy’s Ice Cream Heating, Ventilation & Air Conditioning: Individual split-system units. Supplemental components: air curtain. Fire and Life/Safety: Hydrants, smoke detectors, extinguishers, exit signs, and emergency battery-powered lighting. Dates of Visit: May 23, 2017 On-Site Point of Contact (POC): Scott Sleezer Assessment and Report Prepared by: Paul Prusa Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632 Systemic Condition Summary Site Fair HVAC Fair Structure Good Plumbing Fair   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 2 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Systemic Condition Summary Roof Excellent – Foxy’s Ice Cream Fair – Ginger + Soul Electrical Fair Vertical Envelope Fair Elevators -- Interiors Fair Fire -- The following bullet points highlight the most significant short term and modernization recommendations:  Replacement of furnace  Replacement of water heater  Installation of a complete fire suppression system  Installation of a complete fire alarm system Generally, the property appears to have been constructed within industry standards in force at the time of construction. The property appears to have been well maintained in recent years and is in fair overall condition. According to property management personnel, the property has had a limited capital improvement expenditure program over the past three years, primarily consisting of painting, asphalt pavement seal coating, and roof finish replacement. Supporting documentation was not provided in support of these claims but some of the work is evident. 1.2. Facility Condition Index (FCI) One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate the FCI, which gives an indication of a building’s overall condition. Two FCI ratios are calculated and presented, the Current Year and Ten-Year. The Current Year FCI is the ratio of Immediate Repair Costs to the building’s Current Replacement Value. Similarly, the Ten-Year FCI is the ratio of anticipated Capital Reserve Needs over the next ten years to the Current Replacement Value.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 3 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Fci Condition Rating Definition Percentage Value Good In new or well-maintained condition, with no visual evidence of wear, soiling or other deficiencies. 0% to 5% Fair Subjected to wear and soiling but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition. > than 5% to 10% Poor Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life. > than 10% to 60% Very Poor Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life. Renewal is now necessary. > than 60% The graphs above and tables below represent summary-level findings for the FCA. The deficiencies identified in this assessment can be combined with potential new construction requirements to develop an overall strategy that can serve as the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy. Key findings from the assessment include: Key Finding Metric Current Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (IR)/(CRV) 5.4% Fair 10-Year Facility Condition Index (FCI) FCI = (RR)/(CRV) 20.6% Poor Current Replacement Value (CRV) 2,152 SF * 183.24 / SF = $394,326 Year 0 (Current Year) - Immediate Repairs (IR) $21,625 Years 1-10 – Replacement Reserves (RR) $81,566 Total Capital Needs $103,191 The major issues contributing to the Immediate Repair Costs and the Current Year FCI ratio are summarized below:  Installation of a complete fire suppression system  Installation of a complete fire alarm system Further detail on the specific costs that make up the Immediate Repair Costs can be found in the cost tables at the beginning of this report. 1.3. Special Issues and Follow-Up Recommendations As part of the FCA, a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) was performed to determine the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. Property personnel were interviewed concerning any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Sampling is not a part of this assessment. There are no visual indications of the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, or evidence of moisture in representative readily accessible areas of the property. 1.4. Opinions of Probable Cost Cost estimates are attached at the front of this report (following the cover page). These estimates are based on Invoice or Bid Document/s provided either by the Owner/facility and construction costs developed by construction resources such as R.S. Means and Marshall & Swift, EMG’s experience with past costs for similar properties, city cost indexes, and assumptions regarding future economic conditions.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 4 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary, order of magnitude budgets. Actual costs most probably will vary from the consultant’s opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy, quality of materials and installation, manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected, field conditions, whether a physical deficiency is repaired or replaced in whole, phasing of the work (if applicable), quality of contractor, quality of project management exercised, market conditions, and whether competitive pricing is solicited, etc. ASTM E2018-08 recognizes that certain opinions of probable costs cannot be developed within the scope of this guide without further study. Opinions of probable cost for further study should be included in the FCA. 1.4.1. Methodology Based upon site observations, research, and judgment, along with referencing Expected Useful Life (EUL) tables from various industry sources, EMG opines as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement. Accurate historical replacement records, if provided, are typically the best source of information. Exposure to the elements, initial quality and installation, extent of use, the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised, etc., are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component. As a result, a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual chronological age. The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age. Projections of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) are based on continued use of the Property similar to the reported past use. Significant changes in occupants and/or usage may affect the service life of some systems or components. Where quantities could not be derived from an actual take-off, lump sum costs or allowances are used. Estimated costs are based on professional judgment and the probable or actual extent of the observed defect, inclusive of the cost to design, procure, construct and manage the corrections. 1.4.2. Immediate Repairs Immediate repairs are opinions of probable costs that require immediate action as a result of: (1) material existing or potential unsafe conditions, (2) material building or fire code violations, or (3) conditions that, if not addressed, have the potential to result in, or contribute to, critical element or system failure within one year or will most probably result in a significant escalation of its remedial cost. 1.4.3. Replacement Reserves Replacement Reserves are for recurring probable expenditures, which are not classified as operation or maintenance expenses. The replacement reserves should be budgeted for in advance on an annual basis. Replacement Reserves are reasonably predictable both in terms of frequency and cost. However, Replacement Reserves may also include components or systems that have an indeterminable life but, nonetheless, have a potential for failure within an estimated time period. Replacement Reserves exclude systems or components that are estimated to expire after the reserve term and are not considered material to the structural and mechanical integrity of the subject property. Furthermore, systems and components that are not deemed to have a material effect on the use of the Property are also excluded. Costs that are caused by acts of God, accidents, or other occurrences that are typically covered by insurance, rather than reserved for, are also excluded. Replacement costs are solicited from ownership/property management, EMG’s discussions with service companies, manufacturers' representatives, and previous experience in preparing such schedules for other similar facilities. Costs for work performed by the ownership’s or property management’s maintenance staff are also considered. EMG’s reserve methodology involves identification and quantification of those systems or components requiring capital reserve funds within the assessment period. The assessment period is defined as the effective age plus the reserve term. Additional information concerning system’s or component’s respective replacement costs (in today's dollars), typical expected useful lives, and remaining useful lives were estimated so that a funding schedule could be prepared. The Replacement Reserves Schedule presupposes that all required remedial work has been performed or that monies for remediation have been budgeted for items defined in the Immediate Repair Cost Estimate.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 5 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 2. Purpose and Scope 2.1. Purpose EMG was retained by the client to render an opinion as to the Property’s current general physical condition on the day of the site visit. Based on the observations, interviews and document review outlined below, this report identifies significant deferred maintenance issues, existing deficiencies, and material code violations of record at municipal offices, which affect the Property’s use. Opinions are rendered as to its structural integrity, building system condition and the Property’s overall condition. The report also notes building systems or components that have realized or exceeded their typical expected useful lives. CONDITIONS: The physical condition of building systems and related components are typically defined as being in one of five conditions: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Failed or a combination thereof. For the purposes of this report, the following definitions are used: Excellent = New or very close to new; component or system typically has been installed within the past year, sound and performing its function. Eventual repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Good = Satisfactory as-is. Component or system is sound and performing its function, typically within the first third of its lifecycle. However, it may show minor signs of normal wear and tear. Repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service. Fair = Showing signs of wear and use but still satisfactory as-is, typically near the median of its estimated useful life. Component or system is performing adequately at this time but may exhibit some signs of wear, deferred maintenance, or evidence of previous repairs. Repair or replacement will be required due to the component or system’s condition and/or its estimated remaining useful life. Poor = Component or system is significantly aged, flawed, functioning intermittently or unreliably; displays obvious signs of deferred maintenance; shows evidence of previous repair or workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards; has become obsolete; or exhibits an inherent deficiency. The present condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of contiguous elements or systems. Either full component replacement is needed or repairs are required to restore to good condition, prevent premature failure, and/or prolong useful life. Failed = Component or system has ceased functioning or performing as intended. Replacement, repair, or other significant corrective action is recommended or required. Not Applicable = Assigning a condition does not apply or make logical sense, most commonly due to the item in question not being present. Throughout sections 5 through 9 of this report, each report section will typically contain three subsections organized in the following sequence:  A descriptive table (and/or narrative), which identifies the components assessed, their condition, and other key data points.  A simple bulleted list of Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements, which lists components and assets typically in Excellent, Good, or Fair condition at the time of the assessment but that will require replacement or some other attention once aged past their estimated useful life. These listed components are typically included in the associated inventory database with costs identified and budgeted beyond the first several years.  A bulleted cluster of Actions/Comments, which include more detailed narratives describing deficiencies, recommended repairs, and short term replacements. The assets and components associated with these bullets are/were typically problematic and in Poor or Failed condition at the time of the assessment, with corresponding costs included within the first few years.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 6 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 PLAN TYPES: Each line item in the cost database is assigned a Plan Type, which is the primary reason or rationale for the recommended replacement, repair, or other corrective action. This is the “why” part of the equation. A cost or line item may commonly have more than one applicable Plan Type; however, only one Plan Type will be assigned based on the “best” fit, typically the one with the greatest significance. The following Plan Types are listed in general weighted order of importance: Safety = An observed or reported unsafe condition that if left unaddressed could result in an injury; a system or component that presents a potential liability risk. Performance/Integrity = Component or system has failed, is almost failing, performs unreliably, does not perform as intended, and/or poses a risk to overall system stability. Accessibility = Does not meet ADA, UFAS, and/or other handicap accessibility requirements. Environmental = Improvements to air or water quality, including removal of hazardous materials from the building or site. Modernization/Adaptation = Conditions, systems, or spaces that need to be upgraded in appearance or function to meet current standards, facility usage, or client/occupant needs. Lifecycle/Renewal = Any component or system in which future repair or replacement is anticipated beyond the next several years and/or is of minimal substantial early-term consequence. 2.2. Scope The standard scope of the Facility Condition Assessment includes the following:  Visit the Property to evaluate the general condition of the building and site improvements, review available construction documents in order to familiarize ourselves with, and be able to comment on, the in-place construction systems, life safety, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, and the general built environment.  Identify those components that are exhibiting deferred maintenance issues and provide cost estimates for Immediate Costs and Replacement Reserves based on observed conditions, maintenance history and industry standard useful life estimates. This will include the review of documented capital improvements completed within the last five-year period and work currently contracted for, if applicable.  Provide a full description of the Property with descriptions of in-place systems and commentary on observed conditions.  Provide a general statement of the subject Property’s compliance to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This will not constitute a full ADA survey, but will help identify exposure to issues and the need for further review.  Perform a limited assessment of accessible areas of the building(s) for the presence of fungal growth, conditions conducive to fungal growth, and/or evidence of moisture. EMG will also interview Project personnel regarding the presence of any known or suspected fungal growth, elevated relative humidity, water intrusion, or mildew-like odors. Potentially affected areas will be photographed. Sampling will not be considered in routine assessments.  List the current utility service providers.  Review maintenance records and procedures with the in-place maintenance personnel.  Observe a representative sample of the interior spaces/units, including vacant spaces/units, in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas to be observed include the exterior of the property, the roofs, interior common areas, and the significant mechanical, electrical and elevator equipment rooms.  Provide an Executive Summary at the beginning of this report.  Prepare a mechanical equipment inventory list. 2.3. Personnel Interviewed The building engineer was interviewed for specific information relating to the physical property, available maintenance procedures, historical performance of key building systems and components, available drawings and other documentation. The following personnel from the facility and government agencies were interviewed in the process of conducting the FCA: Name and Title Organization Phone Number Scott Sleezer Parks and Recreation 630.878.7291   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 7 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 The FCA was performed with the assistance of Scott Sleezer, Yorkville Parks and Recreation, the onsite Point of Contact (POC), who was cooperative and provided information that appeared to be accurate based upon subsequent site observations. The onsite contact is completely knowledgeable about the subject property and answered most questions posed during the interview process. The POC’s management involvement at the property has been for the past 26 years. 2.4. Documentation Reviewed Prior to the FCA, relevant documentation was requested that could aid in the knowledge of the subject property’s physical improvements, extent and type of use, and/or assist in identifying material discrepancies between reported information and observed conditions. The review of submitted documents does not include comment on the accuracy of such documents or their preparation, methodology, or protocol. The Documentation Request Form is provided in Appendix E. 2.5. Pre-Survey Questionnaire A Pre-Survey Questionnaire was sent to the POC prior to the site visit and was not returned. The questionnaire is included in Appendix E. 2.6. Weather Conditions May 23, 2017: Raining, with temperatures in the 70s (°F) and light winds.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 8 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 3. Accessibility and Property Research 3.1. ADA Accessibility Generally, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by entities to access and use of “areas of public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” on the basis of disability. Regardless of its age, these areas and facilities must be maintained and operated to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). Buildings completed and occupied after January 26, 1992 are required to comply fully with the ADAAG. Existing facilities constructed prior to this date are held to the lesser standard of compliance to the extent allowed by structural feasibility and the financial resources available. As an alternative, a reasonable accommodation pertaining to the deficiency must be made. During the FCA, a limited visual observation for ADA accessibility compliance was conducted. The scope of the visual observation was limited to those areas set forth in EMG’s Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist provided in Appendix D of this report. It is understood by the Client that the limited observations described herein does not comprise a full ADA Compliance Survey, and that such a survey is beyond the scope of EMG’s undertaking. Only a representative sample of areas was observed and, other than as shown on the Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist, actual measurements were not taken to verify compliance. At a retail property, the areas considered as a public accommodation besides the site itself and parking, are the exterior accessible route, the interior accessible route up to the tenant lease lines and the interior common areas, including the common area restrooms. The facility does not appear to be accessible with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Elements as defined by the ADAAG that are not accessible as stated within the priorities of Title III, are as follows: Restrooms  Wrap drain pipes below lavatory with insulation; protect against contact with hot, sharp, or abrasive surfaces. A full ADA Compliance Survey may reveal additional aspects of the property that are not in compliance. Corrections of these conditions should be addressed from a liability standpoint, but are not necessarily code violations. The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines concern civil rights issues as they pertain to the disabled and are not a construction code, although many local jurisdictions have adopted the Guidelines as such. The cost to address the achievable items noted above is included in the cost tables. 3.2. Municipal Information, Flood Zone and Seismic Zone Not Applicable.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 9 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 4. Existing Building Assessment 4.1. Unit or Space Types All 2,152 square feet of the building are occupied by a multiple occupants, Foxy’s Ice Cream and Ginger + Soul. The building is owned and maintained by the City of Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department. The spaces are a combination of kitchens, dining areas, supporting restrooms, mechanical, and other utility spaces. The following table identifies the reported unit types and mix at the subject property. Unit Types and Mix Quantity Type Floor Area (Sf) 1 Ginger + Soul 1,440 1 Foxy’s Ice Cream 625 1 Shared Mechanical Space 87 TOTAL 2,152 4.2. Inaccessible Areas or Key Spaces Not Observed The interior spaces were observed in order to gain a clear understanding of the property’s overall condition. Other areas accessed included the site within the property boundaries, exterior of the property, and the roof. All areas of the property were available for observation during the site visit.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 10 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 5. Site Improvements 5.1. Utilities The following table identifies the utility suppliers and the condition and adequacy of the services. Site Utilities Utility Supplier Condition and Adequacy Sanitary sewer City of Yorkville Good Storm sewer City of Yorkville Good Domestic water City of Yorkville Good Electric service Commonwealth Edison Good Natural gas service Nicor Gas Good Actions/Comments:  According to the POC, the utilities provided are adequate for the property. There are no unique, onsite utility systems such as emergency electrical generators, septic systems, water or waste water treatment plants, or propane gas tanks. 5.2. Parking, Paving, and Sidewalks Item Description Main Ingress and Egress Hydraulic Ave Access from South Additional Entrances -- Additional Access from -- Paving and Flatwork Item Material Last Work Done Condition Entrance Driveway Apron -- -- -- Parking Lot -- -- -- Drive Aisles -- -- -- Service Aisles -- -- -- Sidewalks -- -- -- Curbs -- -- -- Site Stairs -- -- -- Pedestrian Ramps -- -- --   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 11 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Parking Count Open Lot Carport Private Garage Subterranean Garage Freestanding Parking Structure -- -- -- -- -- Total Number of ADA Compliant Spaces 0 Number of ADA Compliant Spaces for Vans 0 Total Parking Spaces Utilizes Public Lot Parking Ratio (Spaces/Apartments) -- Method of Obtaining Parking Count -- Exterior Stairs Location Material Handrails Condition None -- -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. 5.3. Drainage Systems and Erosion Control Drainage System and Erosion Control System Exists At Site Condition Surface Flow ☒ Good Inlets ☐ -- Swales ☐ -- Detention pond ☐ -- Lagoons ☐ -- Ponds ☐ -- Underground Piping ☐ -- Pits ☐ -- Municipal System ☐ -- Dry Well ☐ -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 12 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  There is no evidence of storm water runoff from adjacent properties. The storm water system appears to provide adequate runoff capacity. There is no evidence of major ponding or erosion. 5.4. Topography and Landscaping Item Description Site Topography Generally flat Landscaping Trees Grass Flower Beds Planters Drought Tolerant Plants Decorative Stone None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Landscaping Condition -- Irrigation Automatic Underground Drip Hand Watering None ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Irrigation Condition -- Retaining Walls Type Location Condition None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The topography and adjacent uses do not appear to present conditions detrimental to the property. There are no significant areas of erosion. 5.5. General Site Improvements Property Signage Property Signage Building mounted Street Address Displayed? Yes Site and Building Lighting Site Lighting None Pole Mounted Bollard Lights Ground Mounted Parking Lot Pole Type ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ --   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 13 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Site and Building Lighting Building Lighting None Wall Mounted Recessed Soffit ☐ ☒ ☐ Good – Foxy’s Ice Cream Fair – Ginger + Soul Site Fencing Type Location Condition None -- -- REFUSE DISPOSAL Refuse Disposal Common area dumpsters Dumpster Locations Mounting Enclosure Contracted? Condition Public Lot Asphalt paving Wood board fence Yes Excellent Other Site Amenities Description Location Condition Playground Equipment None -- -- Tennis Courts None -- -- Basketball Court None -- -- Swimming Pool None -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Exterior lighting Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 14 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6. Building Architectural and Structural Systems 6.1. Foundations Building Foundation Item Description Condition Foundation Slab on grade with integral footings Good Basement and Crawl Space None -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The foundation systems are concealed. There are no significant signs of settlement, deflection, or movement. 6.2. Superstructure Building Superstructure Item Description Condition Framing / Load-Bearing Walls Conventional wood/metal studs Good Ground Floor Concrete slab Good Upper Floor Framing -- -- Upper Floor Decking -- -- Roof Framing Wood trusses Good Roof Decking Plywood or OSB Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The superstructure is exposed in some locations, which allows for limited observation. Walls and floors appear to be plumb, level, and stable. There are no significant signs of deflection or movement. 6.3. Roofing Primary Roof Type / Geometry Flat Finish Modified Bituminous Maintenance Outside Contractor Roof Age 0 Yrs Flashing Membrane Warranties Yes   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 15 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Primary Roof Parapet Copings Parapet with sheet metal coping Roof Drains Gutters and downspouts Fascia Metal Panel Insulation Rigid Board Soffits Concealed Soffits Skylights No Attics -- Ponding No Ventilation Source-1 Turtle Vents Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 -- Roof Condition Excellent The primary roof is located at Foxy’s Ice Cream and Share Mechanical Space. Secondary Roof Type / Geometry Gable Roof Finish Metal Maintenance Outside Contractor Roof Age Approximately 20 Yrs Flashing Membrane Warranties No Parapet Copings None Roof Drains Gutters and downspouts Fascia Metal Panel Insulation Fiberglass batts Soffits None Skylights No Attics Wood joists with plywood sheathing Ponding No Ventilation Source-1 Ridge Vents Leaks Observed No Ventilation Source-2 -- Roof Condition Fair The secondary roof is located at Ginger + Soul. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Metal roofing  Modified bituminous membrane  Roof flashings (included as part of overall membrane replacement)  Parapet wall copings (included as part of overall membrane replacement) Actions/Comments:  The roof finishes vary in age. Information regarding roof warranties or bonds was not available. The roofs are maintained by an outside contractor.  According to the POC, there are no active roof leaks. There is no evidence of active roof leaks.  There is no evidence of roof deck or insulation deterioration. The roof substrate and insulation should be inspected during any future roof repair or replacement work.  Roof drainage appears to be adequate. Clearing and minor repair of drain system components should be performed regularly as part of the property management’s routine maintenance and operations program.  The attics are not accessible and it could not be determined if there is moisture, water intrusion, or excessive daylight in the attics.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 16 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 6.4. Exterior Walls Foxy’s Ice Cream Building Exterior Walls Type Location Condition Primary Finish Painted CMU Good Secondary Finish -- -- Accented with Wood siding Fair Soffits Concealed Fair Ginger + Soul Building Exterior Walls Type Location Condition Primary Finish Vinyl siding Fair Secondary Finish -- -- Accented with -- -- Soffits -- -- Building sealants (caulking) are located between dissimilar materials, at joints, and around window and door openings. Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Exterior paint  Vinyl siding Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance, including patching repairs, graffiti removal, and re-caulking, is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 6.5. Exterior and Interior Stairs Not applicable. There are no exterior or interior stairs. 6.6. Exterior Windows and Doors Building Windows Window Framing Glazing Location Window Screen Condition Vinyl framed, operable Double glaze Foxy’s Ice Cream ☐ Fair Aluminum framed, fixed Double glaze Ginger + Soul ☐ Fair   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 17 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Building Doors Main Entrance Doors Door Type Condition Glazed, metal framed Good Secondary Entrance Doors -- -- Service Doors -- -- Overhead Doors -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Windows  Exterior glazed metal doors Actions/Comments:  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 6.7. Patio, Terrace, and Balcony Building Patio, Terrace and Balcony Type Description Location Condition Ground Floor Patio Asphalt Rear – Ginger + Soul Front – Foxy’s Ice Cream Poor Excellent Upper Balcony Structure -- -- -- Balcony Decks -- -- -- Balcony Deck Toppings -- -- -- Balcony Guardrails -- -- -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Seal coating of asphalt pavement Actions/Comments:  The rear patio asphalt must be seal coated in order to maintain the integrity of the overall pavement system.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 18 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7. Building Mechanical and Plumbing Systems See the Mechanical Equipment List in the Appendices for the quantity, manufacturer’s name, model number, capacity and year of manufacturer of the major mechanical equipment, if available. 7.1. Building Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Individual Units Primary Components Split system furnaces and condensing units Cooling (if separate from above) performed via components above Quantity and Capacity Ranges 2 units at 2.5 tons each Total Heating or Cooling Capacity 5 tons Heating Fuel Natural gas Location of Equipment Building exterior Space Served by System Entire building Age Ranges 2016 – Foxy’s Ice Cream 2006 – Ginger + Soul Primary Component Condition Excellent – Foxy’s Ice Cream Fair – Ginger + Soul Supplemental Components Supplemental Component #1 Air Curtain Location / Space Served by Air Curtain Foxy’s Ice Cream kitchen area Air Curtain Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Split system furnaces and condensing units  Air curtain Actions/Comments:  The HVAC systems are maintained by the in-house maintenance staff.  The HVAC equipment varies in age. HVAC equipment is replaced on an "as needed" basis.  The HVAC equipment appears to be functioning adequately overall. The engineering staff was interviewed about the historical and recent performance of the equipment and systems. No chronic problems were reported and an overall sense of satisfaction with the systems was conveyed. However, due to the inevitable failure of parts and components over time, some of the equipment will require replacement. A budgetary cost for this work is included.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 19 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7.2. Building Plumbing and Domestic Hot Water Building Plumbing System Type Description Condition Water Supply Piping Copper Fair Waste/Sewer Piping PVC Fair Vent Piping PVC Fair Water Meter Location Shared Space Mechanical Room Domestic Water Heaters or Boilers Components Water Heaters Fuel Electric Quantity and Input Capacity 2 units 4,500 W – Ginger + Soul Inaccessible – Foxy’s Ice Cream Storage Capacity 50 gallons – Ginger + Soul Approximately 40 gallons – Foxy’s Ice Cream Boiler or Water Heater Condition Excellent – Ginger + Soul Poor – Foxy’s Ice Cream Supplementary Storage Tanks? No Storage Tank Quantity & Volume -- Quantity of Storage Tanks -- Storage Tank Condition -- Domestic Hot Water Circulation Pumps (3 HP and over) No Adequacy of Hot Water Adequate Adequacy of Water Pressure Adequate Plumbing Fixtures Water Closets Residential grade Toilet (Water Closet) Flush Rating 1,6 GPF Common Area Faucet Nominal Flow Rate 2.0 GPM Condition Good Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Water heaters  Toilets  Sinks  Lavatories   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 20 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Actions/Comments:  The plumbing systems appear to be well maintained and functioning adequately. The water pressure appears to be sufficient. No significant repair actions or short term replacement costs are required. Routine and periodic maintenance is recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components or systems listed above will be required. 7.3. Building Gas Distribution Gas service is supplied from the gas main on the adjacent public street. The gas meter and regulator are located along the exterior walls of the buildings. The gas distribution piping within each building is malleable steel (black iron). Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  No components of significance Actions/Comments:  The pressure and quantity of gas appear to be adequate.  The gas meter and regulator appear to be functioning adequately and will require routine maintenance.  Only limited observation of the gas distribution piping can be made due to hidden conditions. 7.4. Building Electrical Building Electrical Systems Electrical Lines Overhead Transformer Pole-mounted Main Service Size (2) 200 Amps Volts 120/240 Volt, single-phase Meter & Panel Location West side Branch Wiring Copper Conduit Metallic Step-Down Transformers? No Security / Surveillance System? Yes Building Intercom System? No Lighting Fixtures T-8 Main Distribution Condition Fair Secondary Panel and Transformer Condition -- Lighting Condition Fair Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Circuit breaker panels  Interior light fixtures Actions/Comments:  The onsite electrical systems up to the meters are owned and maintained by the respective utility company.  The electrical service and capacity appear to be adequate for the property’s demands.  The panels are mostly original 1970 components. The electrical service is reportedly adequate for the facility’s needs. However, due to the age of the panels and increasing difficulty of obtaining replacement parts over time, lifecycle replacements are recommended per above. 7.5. Building Elevators and Conveying Systems Not applicable. There are no elevators or conveying systems.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 21 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 7.6. Fire Protection and Security Systems Item Description Type None Fire Alarm System Central Alarm Panel ☐ Battery-Operated Smoke Detectors ☒ Alarm Horns ☐ Annunciator Panels ☐ Hard-Wired Smoke Detectors ☐ Strobe Light Alarms ☐ Pull Stations ☐ Emergency Battery-Pack Lighting ☒ Illuminated EXIT Signs ☒ Alarm System Condition -- Sprinkler System None ☒ Standpipes ☐ Backflow Preventer ☐ Hose Cabinets ☐ Fire Pumps ☐ Siamese Connections ☐ Suppression Condition -- Central Alarm Panel System Location of Alarm Panel Installation Date of Alarm Panel -- -- Fire Extinguishers Last Service Date Servicing Current? 08/2015 & 03/2017 No Hydrant Location Hydraulic Avenue Siamese Location -- Special Systems Kitchen Suppression System ☐Computer Room Suppression System ☐ Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Central alarm panel  Alarm devices and system  Sprinkler heads Actions/Comments: The building is not protected by fire suppression. Due to its construction date, the facility is most likely “grandfathered” by code and the installation of fire sprinklers not required until major renovations are performed. Regardless of when or if installation of facility-wide fire suppression is required by the governing municipality, EMG recommends a retrofit be performed. A budgetary cost is included.  The fire alarm systems appear limited to locally alarmed devices. There is a lack of strobes, audio alarms, insufficient pull stations, and system alarms locally only. Due to the age of the components and apparent shortcomings, a full modernization project is recommended. A budgetary cost is included. 7.7. Life Support Systems Not Applicable.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 22 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 8. Interior Spaces 8.1. Interior Finishes The facility is used as a restaurant and ice cream shop. The most significant interior spaces include dining areas and kitchens. Supporting areas include hallways, restrooms, and back-of-house areas. The following table generally describes the locations and typical conditions of the interior finishes within the facility: Typical Floor Finishes Floor Finish Locations General Condition Vinyl tile Ginger + Soul kitchen, Foxy’s Ice Cream Fair Ceramic tile Ginger + Soul corridor and restrooms Good Painted/sealed concrete Ginger + Soul dining area Fair Wood strip Ginger + Soul dining area Good Typical Wall Finishes Wall Finish Locations General Condition Painted CMU Foxy’s Ice Cream Fair Painted drywall Ginger + Soul Fair Typical Ceiling Finishes Ceiling Finish Locations General Condition Suspended T-bar (Acoustic) Foxy’s Ice Cream kitchen, throughout Ginger + Soul Fair Exposed painted structure Foxy’s Ice Cream dining area Fair Exposed structure Shared space mechanical room Fair Interior Doors Item Type Condition Interior Doors Hollow core wood Fully glazed wood Solid core metal Fair Door Framing Wood Fair Fire Doors No -- Anticipated Lifecycle Replacements:  Vinyl tile  Ceramic tile  Interior paint  Suspended acoustic ceiling tile   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 23 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660  Interior doors Actions/Comments:  It appears that the interior finishes have been renovated at different time.  No significant actions are identified at the present time. On-going periodic maintenance is highly recommended. Future lifecycle replacements of the components listed above will be required. 8.2. Commercial Kitchen & Laundry Equipment Not applicable. Commercial kitchen equipment is owned and maintained by the tenant.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 24 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 9. Other Structures Not applicable. There are no major accessory structures.   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 25 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 10. Certification City of Yorkville retained EMG to perform this Facility Condition Assessment in connection with its continued operation of Riverfront Rental Building, 131 East Hydraulic Avenue, Yorkville, Illinois, the “Property”. It is our understanding that the primary interest of City of Yorkville is to locate and evaluate materials and building system defects that might significantly affect the value of the property and to determine if the present Property has conditions that will have a significant impact on its continued operations. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the brief review of the plans and records made available to our Project Manager during the site visit, interviews of available property management personnel and maintenance contractors familiar with the Property, appropriate inquiry of municipal authorities, our Project Manager’s walk-through observations during the site visit, and our experience with similar properties. No testing, exploratory probing, dismantling or operating of equipment or in depth studies were performed unless specifically required under Section 2 of this report. This assessment did not include engineering calculations to determine the adequacy of the Property’s original design or existing systems. Although walk-through observations were performed, not all areas were observed (See Section 4.2 for areas observed). There may be defects in the Property, which were in areas not observed or readily accessible, may not have been visible, or were not disclosed by management personnel when questioned. The report describes property conditions at the time that the observations and research were conducted. This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for the use of City of Yorkville for the purpose stated within Section 2 of this report. The report, or any excerpt thereof, shall not be used by any party other than City of Yorkville or for any other purpose than that specifically stated in our agreement or within Section 2 of this report without the express written consent of EMG. Any reuse or distribution of this report without such consent shall be at City of Yorkville and the recipient’s sole risk, without liability to EMG. Prepared by: Paul Prusa P.E., LEED AP, Project Manager Reviewed by: Al Diefert Technical report Reviewer For Andrew Hupp Program Manager arhupp@emgcorp.com 800.733.0660 x6632   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 26 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 11. Appendices Appendix A: Photographic Record  Appendix B: Site Plan  Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist    RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix A: Photographic Record   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING  131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C  YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322     www.EMGcorp.com   p 800.733.0660       #1: REAR ELEVATION - GINGER + SOUL      #2: FRONT ELEVATION - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #3: LEFT ELEVATION - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #4: RIGHT ELEVATION - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #5: RIGHT ELEVATION - GINGER + SOUL      #6: FRONT ELEVATION - GINGER + SOUL      RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING  131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C  YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322     www.EMGcorp.com   p 800.733.0660       #7: ADA, RESTROOM, LAVATORY PIPE WRAPS      #8: ROOF, METAL      #9: ROOF, MODIFIED BITUMINOUS      #10: DAMAGED DOWNSPOUT      #11: EXTERIOR WALL, PAINTED SURFACE      #12: EXTERIOR WALL, VINYL SIDING      RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING  131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C  YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322     www.EMGcorp.com   p 800.733.0660       #13: WINDOW, VINYL-CLAD DOUBLE- GLAZED 12 SF      #14: WINDOW, VINYL-CLAD DOUBLE- GLAZED 6 SF      #15: WINDOW, ALUMINUM DOUBLE- GLAZED      #16: EXTERIOR DOOR, STEEL W/ GLASS - GINGER + SOUL      #17: EXTERIOR DOOR, STEEL W/ GLASS - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #18: PEDESTRIAN PAVEMENT, ASPHALT - GINGER + SOUL      RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING  131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C  YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322     www.EMGcorp.com   p 800.733.0660       #19: PEDESTRIAN PAVEMENT, ASPHALT - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #20: AIR CURTAIN      #21: CONDENSING UNIT - GINGER + SOUL      #22: CONDENSING UNIT - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #23: FURNACE, GAS - GINGER + SOUL      #24: FURNACE, GAS - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING  131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C  YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322     www.EMGcorp.com   p 800.733.0660       #25: WATER HEATER, ELECTRIC - GINGER + SOUL      #26: WATER HEATER, ELECTRIC - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #27: SINK, STAINLESS STEEL - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #28:  SINK, POT, MULTI- COMPARTMENT - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #29: LAVATORY, VITREOUS CHINA      #30: TOILET, FLUSH TANK (WATER CLOSET)      RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING  131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C  YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322     www.EMGcorp.com   p 800.733.0660       #31:  SINK, POT, MULTI- COMPARTMENT - GINGER + SOUL      #32: SINK, PLASTIC      #33: LIGHTING SYSTEM, INTERIOR - GINGER + SOUL      #34: LIGHTING SYSTEM, INTERIOR - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #35: MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #36: MAIN DISTRIBUTION PANEL - GINGER + SOUL      RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING  131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C  YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322     www.EMGcorp.com   p 800.733.0660       #37: INCANDESCENT LIGHTING FIXTURE, BASIC      #38: LED LIGHTING FIXTURE, BASIC      #39: FLOOD LIGHT, EXTERIOR      #40: EMERGENCY/EXIT COMBO      #41: FIRE EXTINGUISHER      #42: EXIT LIGHTING FIXTURE      RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING  131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C  YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322     www.EMGcorp.com   p 800.733.0660       #43: CAMERA, SECURITY SYSTEM - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #44:  INTERIOR WALL FINISH, GYPSUM BOARD - GINGER + SOUL      #45:  INTERIOR WALL FINISH, CONCRETE/MASONRY - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #46:  INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, PAINTED STRUCTURE - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #47:  INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, ACOUSTICAL TILE (ACT) - GINGER + SOUL      #48:  INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, (ACT) DROPPED FIBERGLASS - GINGER + SOUL      RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING  131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C  YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322     www.EMGcorp.com   p 800.733.0660       #49:  INTERIOR CEILING FINISH, ACOUSTICAL TILE (ACT) - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #50: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, CERAMIC TILE - GINGER + SOUL      #51: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, VINYL TILE (VCT) - GINGER + SOUL      #52: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, VINYL TILE (VCT) - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #53: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, WOOD STRIP - GINGER + SOUL      #54: INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH, CONCRETE - GINGER + SOUL      RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING  131 EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE UNITS A B C  YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 EMG PROJECT NO: 122700.17R000-010.322     www.EMGcorp.com   p 800.733.0660       #55:  INTERIOR DOOR, WOOD HOLLOW-CORE - GINGER + SOUL      #56: INTERIOR DOOR, GLAZED WOOD - GINGER + SOUL      #57: INTERIOR DOOR, STEEL - FOXY'S ICE CREAM      #58:  INTERIOR DOOR, WOOD HOLLOW-CORE - FOXY'S ICE CREAM        RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix B: Site Plan Site Plan Project Name: Riverfront Rental Building Project Number: 122700.17R000-010.322 Source: Google Maps On-Site Date: May 23, 2017   RIVERFRONT RENTAL BUILDING EMG PROJECT NO.: 122700.17R000-010.322 www.EMGcorp.com p 800.733.0660 Appendix C: EMG Accessibility Checklist Page 1 of 4 Date Completed: June 7, 2017 Property Name: Riverfront Rental Building EMG Project Number: 122700.17R000-010.322 Building History Yes No Unk Comments 1 Has an ADA survey previously been completed for this property? X 2 Have any ADA improvements been made to the property? X 3 Does a Transition Plan / Barrier Removal Plan exist for the property? X 4 Has building ownership or management received any ADA related complaints that have not been resolved? X 5 Is any litigation pending related to ADA issues? X Parking Yes No NA Comments 1 Are there sufficient accessible parking spaces with respect to the total number of reported spaces? X Parking is provided via a public lot (included in separate report) and street parking. 2 Are there sufficient van-accessible parking spaces available? X 3 Are accessible spaces marked with the International Symbol of Accessibility? Are there signs reading “Van Accessible” at van spaces? X 4 Is there at least one accessible route provided within the boundary of the site from public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones, if provided, and public streets and sidewalks? X 5 Do curbs on the accessible route have depressed, ramped curb cuts at drives, paths, and drop-offs? X 6 If required does signage exist directing you to accessible parking and an accessible building entrance? X Ramps Yes No NA Comments 1* Do all ramps along accessible path of travel appear to meet slope requirements? ( 1:12 or less) X 2 Are ramps that appear longer than 6 ft complete with railings on both sides? X 3 Does the width between railings appear at least 36 inches? X Page 2 of 4 Ramps Yes No NA Comments 4 Is there a level landing for approximately every 30 ft horizontal length of ramp, at the top and at the bottom of ramps and switchbacks? X Entrances/Exits Yes No NA Comments 1 Do all required accessible entrance doorways appear at least 32 inches wide and not a revolving door? X 2 If the main entrance is inaccessible, are there alternate accessible entrances? X 3 Is the door hardware easy to operate (lever/push type hardware, no twisting required and not higher than approximately 48 inches above the floor)? X Paths of Travel Yes No NA Comments 1 Are all paths of travel free of obstruction and wide enough for a wheelchair (appear at least 36 inches wide)? X 2 Are wheelchair-accessible facilities (toilet rooms, exits, etc.) identified with signage? X 3 Is there a path of travel that does not require the use of stairs? X Elevators Yes No NA Comments 1 Do the call buttons have visual and audible signals to indicate when a call is registered and answered when car arrives? X 2 Are there visual and audible signals inside cars indicating floor change? X 3 Are there standard raised and Braille marking on both jambs of each hoist way entrance as well as all cab/call buttons? X 4 Do elevator doors have a reopening device that will stop and reopen a car door if an object or a person obstructs the door? X 5 Are elevator controls low enough to be reached from a wheelchair (appears to be between 15 and 48 inches)? X 6 If a two-way emergency communication system is provided within the elevator cab, is it usable without voice communication? X Page 3 of 4 Toilet Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 Are common area public restrooms located on an accessible route? X 2 Are pull handles push/pull or lever type? X 3 Are there audible and visual fire alarm devices in the toilet rooms? X 4 Are toilet room access doors wheelchair- accessible (appear to be at least 32 inches wide)? X 5 Are public restrooms large enough to accommodate a wheelchair turnaround (appear to have 60” turning diameter)? X 6 In unisex toilet rooms, are there safety alarms with pull cords? X 7 Are toilet stall doors wheelchair accessible (appear to be at least 32” wide)? X 8 Are grab bars provided in toilet stalls? X 9 Are sinks provided with clearance for a wheelchair to roll under (appear to have 29” clearance)? X 10 Are sink handles operable with one hand without grasping, pinching or twisting? X 11 Are exposed pipes under sink sufficiently insulated against contact? X Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 1 How many total accessible sleeping rooms does the property management report to have? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible sleeping rooms with respect to the total number of reported guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X 2 How many of the accessible sleeping rooms per property management have roll-in showers? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported accessible rooms with roll-in showers with respect to the total number of reported accessible guestrooms? See attached hot sheet. X Page 4 of 4 Guest Rooms Yes No NA Comments 3 How many assistive listening kits and/or rooms with communication features are available per property management? Provide specific number in comment field. Are there sufficient reported assistive listening devices with respect to the total number of rooms? See attached hot sheet. X Pools Yes No NA Comments 1 Are public access pools provided? If the answer is no, please disregard this section. X 2 How many accessible access points are provided to each pool/spa? Provide number in comment field. Is at least one fixed lift or sloped entry to the pool provided? X Play Area Yes No NA Comments 1 Has the play area been reviewed for accessibility? All public playgrounds are subject to ADAAG standards. X Exercise Equipment Yes No NA Comments 1 Does there appear to be adequate clear floor space around the machines/equipment (30” by 48” minimum)? X *Based on visual observation only. The slope was not confirmed through measurements.