The URL can be used to link to this page

Economic Development Packet 2018 03-06-18 AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, March 6, 2018 6:00 p.m. City Hall Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL Citizen Comments: Minutes for Correction/Approval: February 6, 2018 New Business: 1. EDC 2018-17 Building Permit Report for January 2018 2. EDC 2018-18 Building Inspection Report for January 2018 3. EDC 2018-19 Property Maintenance Report for January 2018 4. EDC 2018-20 Economic Development Report for February 2018 5. EDC 2018-21 Kendall Marketplace SSA Amendment 6. EDC 2018-22 Warpinski – Walker Road Rezoning – 1.5 Mile Review Old Business: 1. EDC 2018-15 Developer Deposit Report/Ordinance Additional Business: 2017/2018 City Council Goals – Economic Development Committee Goal Priority Staff “Downtown Planning” 1 Bart Olson & Krysti Barksdale-Noble “Southside Development” 2 Bart Olson & Krysti Barksdale-Noble “Manufacturing and Industrial Development” 4 Krysti Barksdale-Noble “Revenue Growth” 9 Krysti Barksdale-Noble “Capital Improvement Plan” 11 Bart Olson & Krysti Barksdale-Noble “Community Entrance Signage and Wayfinding” 14 Krysti Barksdale-Noble United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 www.yorkville.il.us UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, March 6, 2018 6:00 PM CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. February 6, 2018 □ Approved __________ □ As presented □ With corrections --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2018-17 Building Permit Report for January 2018 □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. EDC 2018-18 Building Inspection Report for January 2018 □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. EDC 2018-19 Property Maintenance Report for January 2018 □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. EDC 2018-20 Economic Development Update □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. EDC 2018-21 Kendall Marketplace SSA Amendment □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. EDC 2018-22 Warpinski – Walker Road Rezoning – 1.5 Mile Review □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OLD BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2018-15 Developer Deposit Report/Ordinance □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Minutes Tracking Number Minutes of the Economic Development Committee – February 6, 2018 Economic Development Committee – March 6, 2018 Majority Committee Approval Minute Taker Name Department Page 1 of 3 DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, February 6, 2018, 6:00pm City Conference Room In Attendance: Committee Members Chairman Ken Koch Alderman Alex Hernandez Alderman Joel Frieders Alderman Carlo Colosimo Other City Officials City Administrator Bart Olson Interim Assistant City Administrator Erin Willrett Community Development Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble Code Official Pete Ratos Senior Planner Jason Engberg Alderman Chris Funkhouser City Consultant Lynn Dubajic City Engineer Brad Sanderson/EEI Other Guests Dan LaTurno, President, Aurora Specialty Textiles The meeting was called to order by Chairman Ken Koch at 6:00pm. Citizen Comments: None Minutes for Correction/Approval: January 2, 2018 The minutes were approved on a unanimous voice vote. New Business 1. EDC 2018-09 Building Permit Reports for December 2017 Mr. Ratos reported 9 single family permits, 1 B.U.I.L.D. and 12 single family attached. He also reported the number of permits for the year. No further comments. 2. EDC 2018-10 Building Inspection Report for December 2017 Inspections done in December totaled 218, most of which were for Ryan Homes in Grande Reserve. Mr. Ratos said some permits have already been issued for spring where roads do not yet exist in Grande Reserve. No further discussion. 3. EDC 2018-11 Property Maintenance Report for December 2017 Four cases were heard in December. Mr. Ratos said other violations that were ticketed were rectified in the 10-day period. No discussion. Page 2 of 3 4. EDC 2018-12 Economic Development Update 1. Ms. Dubajic said a Yorkville resident with a scrapbooking business will host retreat weekends for scrapbookers twice a month. This will generate 1,200 hotel stays per year. She will have permanent space in the city and hopes to be open in late spring. 2. Working with prospective tenants for downtown buildings 3. Received permit application for banquet hall in Stagecoach Crossing 4. Working on prospective tenants for Kendall Marketplace, 28 lots nearby have been sold 5. Environmental Services bought empty bank building at Rt. 47 & Cannonball 6. Two national chain restaurants looking at Yorkville 7. A-frame building by Rt. 34 & 47 will become Salerno's Red Hots No further comments. 5. EDC 2018-13 Annual Foreclosure Update Ms. Noble said there were 61 single family foreclosures in 2017, most in Ward 3. She compared the numbers to previous years and said overall there was a downward trend. Kendall County now ranks number 4 in foreclosures in the State. It was decided the yearly total minus detail was adequate for the committee in the future. 6. EDC 2018-14 Manufacturing and Industrial City Council Goal Action Plans Mr. Olson expanded on three Council action plan items from the Goal Setting Meeting which had also been discussed the previous year. 1. BNSF Site Certification process for Eldamain and Wrigley corridors 2. Marketing Eldamain area 3. Meet with developers to discuss enterprise zones The committee also discussed compiling packets for developers which would include zoning and other data. Alderman Frieders proposed the business directory discussed 2 years ago and said the city could provide a free link on the city website along with a featured business. Ms. Willrett said there is now a draft business directory and a questionnaire to use for joining the directory. Alderman Koch said that YEDC had a website a few years ago, however, it was a membership-based website. Mr. Olson continued with new goals: 4. YBSD plant capacity: Mr. Dan LaTurno, President of Aurora Specialty Textiles in Yorkville, was present. His business uses 25,000 gallons of water a day and YBSD has informed them their water usage will be cut by 60% in July. This would mean the loss of 85 jobs if accommodations cannot be made. He will be meeting with the head of YBSD. Mr. Sanderson said he is also trying to secure a meeting with YBSD and said they recently expanded capacity. Alderman Koch noted that any Eldamain development would be connected to YBSD and the committee agreed this is an important issue to be addressed. 5. Metra Site: Location needs to be determined. 6. Utility Expansion Plans: The city did a cost estimate for extending water and sewer to Eldamain to help secure businesses. 7. Nicor and ComEd Status: Meet with these utilities to discuss capacity and possible expansion. Page 3 of 3 8. Boundary Agreement with Plano: Most of Eldamain is in Plano School District and Yorkville schools might not benefit. Will discuss alignment of boundaries. Alderman Colosimo noted most of Schaefer Woods has Plano address, but attend Yorkville schools. 9. Food Hub: promote historical background in agriculture, protect land for agricultural uses. 10. Marijuana Legalization: Significant discussion in upcoming governor's election, prepare for less regulated industry. 11. Industrial Development Feasibility Study: Engage consultant to make recommendations to attract businesses. Will also research grant applications. Alderman Frieders asked Mr. Olson to prioritize the above items and the committee agreed that YBSD capacity is the most critical. Mr. Colosimo said the city needs to have a portfolio of all lots and utility stats available for prospective businesses. Mr. Engberg said he has already started compiling this information. In conclusion, Mr. Olson said the action plan items will be forwarded to the regular Council agenda for adoption on February 13th. 7. EDC 2018-15 Developer Deposit Report/Ordinance Ms. Noble discussed a memo that addressed deposit/engineering review fees established in 2002. She said the fees are now falling short especially since outside consultants are being used. Staff researched what other communities are charging and it is being recommended to increase developer fees. Mr. Olson added that the city is still spending less on outsourcing engineering work. Comments included to raise the fees and return unused funds, fees need to be more well- defined depending on the project details such as a pole building vs. an assisted living both on the same acreage, developers would balk at paying huge fees upfront, concentrate on better estimates of engineering fees, charge percentage-based fees determined by cost of project, escrow, etc., consider whether project is commercial or residential. While the staff recommendation was a flat amount increase, the committee was leaning towards percentage-based fees. It was decided the deposit would be collected when the developer initially comes in. Ms. Noble will bring past projects as examples and this will be brought back to committee for further consideration. 8. EDC 2018-16 Renewal of Intergovernmental Agreement with Kendall County For Building Inspection Services The committee was OK with this agreement. Old Business None Additional Business: None There was no further business and the meeting adjourned at 7:38pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #1 Tracking Number EDC 2018-17 Building Permit Report for January 2018 Economic Development Committee – March 6, 2018 N/A N/A N/A Informational None All permits issued in January 2018. D. Weinert Community Development Name Department C:\Users\lpickering\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\LGD8F903\Jan 2018.doc Prepared by: D Weinert UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUILDING PERMIT REPORT January 2018 TYPES OF PERMITS Number of Permits Issued SFD Single Family Detached B.U.I.L.D Single Family Detached Program Begins 1/1/2012 SFA Single Family Attached Multi- Family Apartments Condominiums Commercial Includes all Permits Issued for Commercial Use Industrial Misc. Construction Cost Permit Fees January 2018 43 4 11 0 0 10 0 18 3,329,185.00 223,014.13 Calendar Year 2018 43 4 11 0 0 10 0 18 3,329,185.00 223,014.13 Fiscal Period 2018 740 57 68 12 1 121 0 481 62,792,087.00 2,228,495.07 January 2017 32 1 6 0 0 10 0 15 1,916,727.00 98,105.55 Calendar Year 2017 32 1 6 0 0 10 0 15 1,916,727.00 98,105.55 Fiscal Period 2017 669 40 82 0 0 91 0 456 30,098,866.00 1,480,888.63 January 2016 19 0 0 0 0 10 0 9 168,642.00 2,400.00 Calendar Year 2016 19 0 0 0 0 10 0 9 168,642.00 2,400.00 Fiscal Period 2016 478 7 54 0 0 105 0 312 14,423,747.00 825,131.08 January 2015 21 0 5 0 0 11 0 5 31,042,751.00 72,189.77 Calendar Year 2015 21 0 5 0 0 11 0 5 31,042,751.00 72,189.77 Fiscal Period 2015 453 2 52 0 0 86 0 313 50,301,068.00 852,193.98 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #2 Tracking Number EDC 2018-18 Building Inspection Report for January 2018 Economic Development Committee – March 6, 2018 N/A N/A N/A Informational None All inspections scheduled in January 2018. D. Weinert Community Development Name Department DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1TIME: 12:21:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 01/01/2018 TO 01/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 006-ABC ABOVE CEILING 20160888 129 COMMERCIAL DR 18 01/29/2018Comments1: BUILDING LOCKED UNABLE TO INSPECTPR _____ AM 007-REI REINSPECTION 01/30/2018Comments1: ABOVE CEILINGPR _____ 037-ABC ABOVE CEILING 20160894 1050 FREEMONT ST 01/03/2018PR 08:00 038-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 01/17/2018BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170261 110 E COUNTRYSIDE PKWY 01/11/2018PR _____ 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170422 809 MORGAN ST 01/05/2018Comments1: FURNACEPR _____ 006-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170494 602 WINDETT RIDGE RD 159 01/16/2018PR _____ 007-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 01/16/2018PR _____ 008-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 01/16/2018PR _____ 009-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 01/16/2018BC _____ 010-INS INSULATION 01/18/2018Comments1: INSPECT BASEMENT AT FINALBC _____ 011-FTG FOOTING 01/30/2018BC _____ 012-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 01/30/2018PR _____ 008-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170524 1800 MARKETVIEW DR 4 01/17/2018Comments1: FINAL FOR STOCKINGBC _____ AM 009-FTG FOOTING 01/30/2018PR _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170577 1006 S CARLY CIR 112 01/18/2018Comments1: IEC STICKER NEEDED IN PANELPR _____ 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 01/18/2018TK _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 01/19/2018Comments1: OK TO TEMPPR _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170585 1321 SPRING ST 168 01/09/2018PR _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 01/09/2018BC _____ 018-FTG FOOTING 20170593 3465 RYAN DR 4 01/17/2018 DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2TIME: 12:21:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 01/01/2018 TO 01/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 018-FTG FOOTING 20170594 2611 MCLELLAN BLVD 42 01/17/2018PR _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170597 2838 SILVER SPRINGS CT 255 01/08/2018PR _____ 017-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 01/08/2018PR _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170599 2824 SILVER SPRINGS CT 259 01/08/2018PR _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 01/08/2018BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170609 536 W BARBERRY CIR 70 01/08/2018Comments1: EXTREME ICE BUILDUP ON INTERIOR GLASS &Comments2: FRAMES. POTENTIAL SEAL PROBLEMBC _____ 002-REI REINSPECTION 01/26/2018BC _____ 012-INS INSULATION 20170611 2866 CRANSTON CIR 93 01/03/2018PR _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170615 2732 CRANSTON CIR 118 01/04/2018PR _____ 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 01/04/2018TK _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 01/04/2018Comments1: BBOX KEYABLE OK TO TEMPPR _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170619 2298 GRANDE TRAIL CT 173 01/19/2018PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 01/19/2018TK _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 01/19/2018Comments1: OK TO TEMPPR _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170650 951 PURCELL ST 61 01/24/2018PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 01/24/2018TK _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 01/24/2018Comments1: BBOX KEYABLE OK TO TEMPPR _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170662 2591 LYMAN LOOP 40 01/11/2018PR _____ 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 01/11/2018BC _____ 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170703 2800 N ROUTE 47 01/12/2018PR _____ 002-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20170712 2584 MADDEN CT 9 01/05/2018Comments1: THE WORK THAT HAS BEEN DONE IS APPROVED.Comments2: DO NOT DO ANY OTHER WORK UNTIL A PROFESComments3: SIONAL HAS LOOKED AT THE WATER DAMAGE TOComments4: THE STRUCTURE DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3TIME: 12:21:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 01/01/2018 TO 01/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 007-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170734 2184 BURR CT 9 01/09/2018PR _____ 008-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 01/09/2018PR _____ 009-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 01/09/2018PR _____ 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 01/09/2018PR _____ 011-INS INSULATION 01/11/2018BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170775 402 SANDERS CT 12 01/09/2018PR _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170778 2798 CRANSTON CIR 98 01/29/2018PR _____ 017-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 01/29/2018TK _____ 018-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 01/29/2018Comments1: BBOX KEYABLE OK TO TEMPPR _____ 005-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170781 958 PURCELL ST 84 01/25/2018PR _____ 006-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 01/25/2018PR _____ 007-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 01/25/2018PR _____ 008-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 01/25/2018BC _____ 005-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 20170796 2609 FAIRFAX WAY 251 01/30/2018Comments1: WAITING FOR UNDERSLAB PLUMBING INSPECTIOComments2: NPR _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 01/30/2018PR _____ 013-INS INSULATION 20170807 2465 WILTON CT 128 01/02/2018PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 20170817 3178 BOOMBAH BLVD 131 01/26/2018PR _____ AM 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20170824 1100 W VETERANS PKWY 01/30/2018BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170825 2277 NORTHLAND LN 01/11/2018PR _____ 004-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170830 308 WESTWIND DR 2 01/22/2018PR _____ 005-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 01/22/2018PR _____ 006-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 01/22/2018PR _____ 007-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 01/22/2018 DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4TIME: 12:21:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 01/01/2018 TO 01/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 008-INS INSULATION 01/25/2018BC _____ 009-REI REINSPECTION 01/26/2018Comments1: INSULATIONPR _____ 010-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 01/26/2018BC _____ 011-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 01/31/2018PR _____ 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170840 3111 LAUREN DR 92 01/12/2018PR _____ 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 01/12/2018PR _____ 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 01/12/2018PR _____ 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 01/12/2018PR _____ 013-STK STACK TEST 01/16/2018BC _____ 014-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 01/11/2018BC _____ 015-STP STOOP 01/18/2018PR _____ 009-INS INSULATION 20170841 3161 LAUREN DR 87 01/04/2018PR _____ 010-STK STACK TEST 01/04/2018PR _____ 011-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 01/02/2018PR _____ 012-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 01/02/2018PR _____ 013-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 01/02/2018PR _____ 014-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 01/02/2018BC _____ 015-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 01/08/2018BC _____ 016-STP STOOP 01/08/2018BC _____ 016-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20170842 505 SHADOW WOOD DR 106 01/08/2018BC _____ 017-STP STOOP 01/08/2018BC _____ 009-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20170877 488 SHADOW WOOD DR 103 01/18/2018BC _____ 010-STP STOOP 01/18/2018BC _____ AM 003-BKF BACKFILL 20170888 941 PURCELL ST 62 01/22/2018 DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5TIME: 12:21:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 01/01/2018 TO 01/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170896 1366 SPRING ST 219 01/16/2018PR _____ 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 01/16/2018PR _____ 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 01/16/2018PR _____ 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 01/16/2018PR _____ 004-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170917 215 W KENDALL DR 01/10/2018PR _____ 005-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 01/10/2018BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170919 622 BIRCHWOOD DR 151 01/05/2018BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 20170920 521 OMAHA DR 4 01/23/2018PR _____ PM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170921 10 SARAVANOS DR 1 01/30/2018PR _____ PM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 01/30/2018PR _____ PM 003-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 01/30/2018BC _____ AM 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170945 1414 ASPEN LN 86 01/30/2018BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20170949 344 FONTANA DR 54 01/10/2018BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 01/11/2018BC _____ PM 003-BKF BACKFILL 01/18/2018PR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 01/30/2018PR _____ 005-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 01/19/2018PR _____ 006-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 01/19/2018PR _____ 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 01/30/2018PR _____ 008-CRL CRAWL SPACE 01/30/2018BC _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20170953 2186 BURR CT 8 01/17/2018BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 01/19/2018PR _____ 003-WAT WATER 01/29/2018BC _____ AM 001-FOU FOUNDATION 20170954 2623 BURR ST 80 01/22/2018 DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6TIME: 12:21:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 01/01/2018 TO 01/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 002-BKF BACKFILL 01/26/2018PR _____ 003-WAT WATER 01/29/2018BC _____ 001-OCC OCCUPANCY INSPECTION 20170957 1155 N BRIDGE ST 01/24/2018Comments1: UN GROUNDED CIRCUIT UNDER NEW COUNTERPR _____ 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170958 220 S BRIDGE ST 01/29/2018BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20170960 465 SHADOW WOOD DR 33 01/10/2018BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 01/11/2018BC _____ PM 003-BKF BACKFILL 01/18/2018PR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 01/30/2018PR _____ 005-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 01/19/2018PR _____ 006-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 01/19/2018PR _____ 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 01/30/2018PR _____ 008-CRL CRAWL SPACE 01/30/2018BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20170962 3204 PINEWOOD DR 37 01/24/2018PR _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 01/29/2018BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170977 2454 WAVERLY CIR 239 01/17/2018Comments1: CAULKING MISSING IN SPOTS OF FRONT BAY WComments2: INDOW. SUBJECT TO MOISTURE PENETRATION.PR _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170978 1439 CANNONBALL TR 01/17/2018BKF _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 01/17/2018Comments1: NO FIRE EXTINGUISHERSBC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20170981 2731 PHELPS CT 268 01/09/2018BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 01/10/2018BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 01/17/2018PR _____ 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 01/25/2018PR _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20170982 2667 FAIRFAX WAY 258 01/29/2018 DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7TIME: 12:21:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 01/01/2018 TO 01/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 01/31/2018BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20170985 3475 RYAN DR 3 01/24/2018PR _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 01/29/2018BC _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20170986 562 SHADOW WOOD DR 96 01/18/2018BC _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 01/23/2018BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 01/30/2018PR _____ 004-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 01/29/2018PR _____ 005-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 01/29/2018BC 11:30 001-FTG FOOTING 20170987 582 SHADOW WOOD DR 94 01/18/2018BC _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 01/22/2018BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 01/30/2018PR _____ 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 01/29/2018PR _____ 005-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 01/29/2018BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20170993 988 S CARLY CIR 110 01/12/2018BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20170995 1202 PATRICK CT 13 01/10/2018BC 11:30 002-FOU FOUNDATION 01/18/2018Comments1: PLACE 2 4 IN TOP OF THE WALLBC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 01/31/2018BC _____ PM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20180002 1956 SUNNY DELL CT 97 01/08/2018BC _____ AM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20180005 522 BURNING BUSH DR 99 01/30/2018BC _____ 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20180010 2246 LAVENDER WAY 61 01/23/2018BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 01/31/2018BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180014 1531 STONERIDGE CT 66 01/22/2018BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180020 311 CHURCH ST 01/26/2018BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180021 407 COLTON ST 1 01/26/2018 DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8TIME: 12:21:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 01/01/2018 TO 01/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ PM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20180023 548 REDHORSE LN 138 01/29/2018BC _____ 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180029 1893 WALSH DR. 01/26/2018BC _____ 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 01/26/2018BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180043 4562 GARDINER AVE 1131 01/25/2018 DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9TIME: 12:21:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 01/01/2018 TO 01/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: ADD ADDITION 1APT APARTMENT, CONDO 2BDO COMMERCIAL BUILD-OUT 3BIP BUILD INCENTIVE PROGRAM SFD 48BSM BASEMENT REMODEL 8CCO COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 3COM COMMERCIAL BUILDING 1CRM COMMERCIAL REMODEL 6DCK DECK 3ESN ELECTRIC SIGN 1FNC FENCE 3HVC HVAC UNIT/S 1MIS MISCELLANEOUS 1MSC MISCELLANEOUS 1REM REMODEL 1REP REPAIR 1ROF ROOFING 1SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 73WIN WINDOW REPLACEMENT 5INSPECTION SUMMARY: ABC ABOVE CEILING 2BKF BACKFILL 9BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 4CRL CRAWL SPACE 2EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPECTION 5ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 1ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 4ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WATER 5FIN FINAL INSPECTION 23FOU FOUNDATION 11FTG FOOTING 17GAR GARAGE FLOOR 5INS INSULATION 6OCC OCCUPANCY INSPECTION 1PHD POST HOLE - DECK 1PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 3PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READY 11PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 9PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 5REI REINSPECTION 3REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 9RFR ROUGH FRAMING 12RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 7STK STACK TEST 2STP STOOP 4WAT WATER 2 DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10DATE: 01/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10TIME: 12:21:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 01/01/2018 TO 01/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------INSPECTOR SUMMARY: BC BOB CREADEUR 67BKF BRISTOL KENDALL FIRE DEPT 1PR PETER RATOS 90TK TOM KONEN 5STATUS SUMMARY: C BC 12C BKF 1C PR 6I BC 54I PR 68T BC 1T PR 16T TK 5REPORT SUMMARY: 163 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #3 Tracking Number EDC 2018-19 Property Maintenance Report for January 2018 Economic Development Committee – March 6, 2018 Informational None Pete Ratos Community Development Name Department Page | 1 Property Maintenance Report January 2018 Adjudication: 3 Property Maintenance Cases heard in January 1/03/2018 N 3586 305 E Fox St Motor Vehicles on Property Dismissed 1/17/2018 N 3587 601 Heustis St Exterior Property Areas Liable $0.0 1/22/2018 N 2703 706 S State St Unsafe Structures Continued Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Pete Ratos, Code Official CC: Bart Olson, Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Lisa Pickering Date: January 30, 2018 Subject: January Property Maintenance Case # Case DateADDRESS OF COMPLAINTTYPE OF VIOLATIONDOWNTOWN SWEEPSTATUS VIOLATION LETTER SENTFOLLOW UP STATUSCITATION ISSUEDDATE OF HEARINGFINDINGS20180025 1/30/20185360 Willow wayWork with out a permitCLOSED20180024 1/29/2018 Parking Lot On 634 A-F W Veterans PkwyDo Not Enter SignIN VIOLATION1/30/201820180023 1/26/2018 120 Naden Ct VehicleIN VIOLATION1/30/201820180022 1/26/2018 109 N Conover CtVehicleIN VIOLATION1/30/201820180021 1/26/2018 107 E Kendall DrVehicleIN VIOLATION1/26/201820180020 1/25/2018 119 Strawberry LnOff street parkingIN VIOLATION1/26/201820180019 1/25/2018 2204 Meadowview LnOff Street ParkingIN VIOLATION1/25/201820180018 1/25/2018 211 Walsh Cir Off Street ParkingIN VIOLATION1/25/201820180017 1/25/2018 1875 Walsh Dr Off Street ParkingIN VIOLATION1/25/201820180016 1/22/2018 Parking Lot in Autumn Creek Blvd next to Orchid StVehiclesIN VIOLATION1/24/201820180015 1/22/2018 Parking Lot in Autumn Creek Blvd next to Orchid StVehiclesIN VIOLATION1/24/2018Case Report1/1/2018 - 1/31/2018Page: 1 of 2 20180014 1/22/2018 Parking Lot in Autumn Creek Blvd next to Orchid StVehiclesIN VIOLATION1/22/201820180013 1/19/2018 1609 Cottonwood TrlOff Street ParkingIN VIOLATION1/19/201820180012 1/19/2018 1620 Cottonwood TrlVehicleIN VIOLATION1/19/201820180011 1/19/2018 1405 Aspen Ln VehiclePENDING20180010 1/19/2018 1438 Chest Nut LnVehiclePENDING20180009 1/19/2018 1433 Chestnut LnVehiclePENDING20180008 1/19/2018 1406 Chestnut LnVehiclePENDING20180007 1/17/2018 2551 N Bridge StWork with out a permitCLOSED1/17/2018 COMPLIANT20180006 1/16/2018 683 YELLOWSTONE LNCAR PARKED ON LAWNCLOSED20180005 1/5/2018 2398 Iroquois LnJunk and RefuseCLOSED20180004 1/3/2018 308 N. Bridge St.No Occupancy PermitCLOSED1/3/201820180003 1/2/2018 Caledonia Subd. Snipe SignsIN VIOLATION1/2/201820180002 1/2/2018 Walnut st. Snipe SignsIN VIOLATION1/2/2018Total Records: 241/31/2018Page: 2 of 2 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #4 Tracking Number EDC 2018-20 Economic Development Report for February 2018 Economic Development Committee – March 6, 2018 N/A See attached. Bart Olson Administration Name Department 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 102  Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Phone 630-553-0843  FAX 630-553-0889 Monthly Report – for March 2018 EDC Meeting of the United City of Yorkville February 2018 Activity Downtown Redevelopment: - Continue working with Imperial Investments to identify a variety of businesses who may be potential tenant candidates for future and existing buildings. - Working with other small businesses looking at opportunities in the Downtown. Development south of Fox River: - Continue working with Eleno Silva. Eleno has been issued an exterior building permit for the partially built structure in Stagecoach Crossing. - Idea Marketing which is currently located in Fountain Village (Route 47 & 71), has purchased a portion of former West Suburban Bank building in Stagecoach Crossing. They are planning on moving into their new home in the spring. They will also have small spaces available to lease out to individuals who may be looking to grow their business. - Subway Sandwich Shop has closed at Fountain Village. With this business closing, and Idea Marketing moving, this Center has limited tenants. Development north of the Fox River: - Kendall Crossing…Construction is moving along on the Holiday Inn Express and Banquet Facility. Working with a variety of perspective businesses, who are looking at leasing space or purchasing land at Kendall Crossing. - Kendall Marketplace…Working with Alex Berman (owner) to identify potential additional development on the project. The junior box is continuing to negotiate their lease. The final hurdle is signage. Alex has begun the process to get approvals for an increase in height for the two monument signs to meet the needs of this retailer. There is also another national retailer looking at center that would be considered a small space fashion business. Also working with quick casual and fast food users, who are considering outlot development at Kendall Marketplace. Alex is determining whether the time is right is build a multi-tenant building on an outlot in 2018. - Continue to work with two National restaurants chains are looking closely at Yorkville. While I am unable to disclose the names of these two very familiar chains, I can state that one has put a piece of property under contract and is completing their due diligence. The other has narrowed their search to three sites. The due diligence on these potential businesses continues. - While I am not able to provide detailed information because of ongoing negotiation, I would like to state that I have been working with a number of new business that are considering existing vacant space to lease for their business. Industrial Development: - Working with Joyce Sloan, the industrial broker, who is the listing agent on Lincoln Prairie on Eldamain Road. - Working with small industrial user to locate in Yorkville. This business owner is a resident, and currently operates in a su rrounding community. I hope to be able to report more specifics in the next 30 to 60 days. Project is out for financing options at this time. Recreation: - Go for it Sports…continue working with the center, who now has teams in rugby, lacrosse, track, baseball, soccer, softball, and track practicing at the facility. They have also been working with the Chicago Fire Professional Soccer Team, who is going to be holding free soccer clinics for area youth. Other Activity: - Hosted the quarterly KEDA meeting. We were able to get representatives from DCEO (the State of Illinois) to make a presentation for the group regarding the State of Illinois programs for business such as EDGE. Respectfully submitted, Lynn Dubajic 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 102 Yorkville, IL 60560 lynn@dlkllc.com 630-209-7151 cell Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #5 Tracking Number EDC 2018-21 Kendall Marketplace SSA Amendment Economic Development Committee - March 6, 2018 N/A See attached memo. Bart Olson Administration Name Department Summary Consideration of an ordinance to remove a property from the Kendall Marketplace SSA. Background The City approved development and incentive agreements, and SSA creation documents, for the Kendall Marketplace property in 2006. The SSA was formally and finally established in 2007, as part of Ordinance 2007-26. The SSA was used to fund public roadwork for Beecher Road, Cannonball Trail, and Route 34. Those improvements were part of the approval of the commercial portion of the Kendall Marketplace development, and were not intended to benefit or be paid for by any of the residential areas in Kendall Marketplace. This intent is memorialized in the various bond documents (not included, due to length) for the project and the metes and bounds legal description in Ordinance 2007-26. The metes and bounds legal description is hand-drawn with a red outline on the attached final plat exhibit. Generally, it includes all of the southern portion of the property, does not include the majority of Lot 52, and does not include any of the single family residential lots on the north end of the property. The problematic property in question is the eastern panhandle of lot 52, immediately north of lot 57 which is the detention basin. This eastern panhandle of lot 52 is a townhouse parcel, and should not have been included in the metes and bounds legal description for the SSA boundaries. On a related, but mutually exclusive note – a decade ago, the County had misread the metes and bounds legal description for the Kendall Marketplace SSA and incorrectly included all of the single family residential lots and all of lot 52 (the townhouse lot) in the Kendall Marketplace SSA. Because the metes and bounds legal description did not contain these areas, the County was able to correct that error administratively. Because the property under consideration as part of this agenda item was included in the metes and bounds legal description (even improperly so), the County can not remove the parcel from the SSA without City action. Attorney Orr has drafted a memo clarifying the City’s authority to remove this non-benefited parcel from the Kendall Marketplace SSA. A draft ordinance is also attached. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the attached ordinance. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: February 27, 2018 Subject: Kendall Marketplace SSA cleanup LAW OFFICE KATHLEEN FIELD ORR & ASSOCIATES 53 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 935 Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312)382-2113 (312)382-2127 facsimile KATHLEEN FIELD ORR kfo@kfoassoc.com M E M O R A N D U M To: Mayor Golinski and City Council of the United City of Yorkville cc: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Kathleen Field Orr, City Attorney Date: March 1, 2018 Subject: Special Service Area for Kendall Market Place __________________________________________________________________________ In 2007, pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Law, 35 ILCS 200/27-5 et seq. (the “Act”), the City established a special service area covering the property included in Kendall Marketplace to finance the cost of the roadwork for Beecher Road, Cannonball Trail and Route 34. Included in such special service area was a parcel of property which is the detention basin for the subdivision and, therefore, should hot have been included. Section 200/27-120 of the Act provides: “Exclusion of erroneously included property. If a property is determined by the corporate authorities of the municipality to be erroneously included in a special service area, the corporate authorities of the municipality may disconnect that property from the special service area solely by municipal action without regard to Section 27-60 or Section 27-65 of this Act.” In accordance with the authorization to remove erroneously included property in a special service area as provided by the Act, attached hereto is an Ordinance taking such action for your consideration. Ordinance No. 2018-___ Page 1 Ordinance No. 2018-______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, DISCONNECTING CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR SPECIAL SERVICE AREA 2006-113 WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”), is a non-home rule municipality duly organized in accordance with the 1970 Constitution and the laws of the State of Illinois; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Article VII, Section 7(6) of the Constitution of the State of Illinois, and pursuant to the provisions of the Illinois Special service Area Tax Law, 35 ILCS 200/27-5 et seq. (the “Act”), the City is authorized to establish special service areas for the provision of special governmental services in portions of the City and to levy or impose a special tax and to issue bonds for the provision of such special services; and, WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2007-26 passed by the Mayor and City Council on March 13, 2007, Special Service Area 2006-113 was established to finance the cost of infrastructure benefitting the property legally described on Exhibit C attached to said Ordinance No. 2007-26 (the “Legal Description”), which legal description erroneously included a parcel of property utilized as a detention basin; and, WHEREAS, the Act provides at Section 200/27-5: “Exclusion of erroneously included property. If a property is determined by the corporate authorities of the municipality to be erroneously included in a special service area, the corporate authorities of the municipality may disconnect that property from the special service area solely by municipal action without regard to Section 27-60 or Section 27-65 of this Act.” WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council are prepared to delete that certain parcel of property used as a detention basin, legally described on Exhibit A attached Ordinance No. 2018-___ Page 2 hereto and made a part hereof as hereinafter provided, as such parcel was erroneously included in Special Service Area 2006-113. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. The parcel of real estate legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof is hereby deleted from Special Service Area 2006-113 as having been erroneously included therein. Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record this Ordinance with the Recorder of Kendall County and to file it with the Kendall County Clerk upon its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this ____ day of ____________________, A.D. 2018. ______________________________ City Clerk CARLO COLOSIMO ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ ARDEN JOE PLOCHER ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ SEAVER TARULIS ________ ALEX HERNANDEZ ________ APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this _____ day of ____________________, A.D. 2018. ____________________________________ Mayor Ordinance No. 2018-___ Page 3 Attest: _________________________________ City Clerk Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #6 Tracking Number EDC 2018-22 One and a half mile review for County Case 18-05 Economic Development Committee – March 6, 2018 none none Memo explains County Case 18-05 mile and one half review of a rezone request Jason Engberg Community Development Name Department Proposal Summary Staff has reviewed a request from Kendall County Planning and Zoning Department along with the subsequent documents attached. This property is located within one and a half miles of the planning boundary for Yorkville, allowing us the opportunity to review and provide comments to Kendall County. The petitioners, Keith and Kathleen Warpinski, are requesting a map amendment rezone for their property from A-1 Agricultural District to R-1 Residential District. Petitioners would like to construct a single family home in the future and may not do so due to the zoning requirements of the agricultural district in Kendall County. The 6.9 acre property is located at the north side of Walker Road approximately 0.31 miles east of Route 47. As stated in the petitioner’s findings of fact, they believe the use is compatible with other nearby uses in the area as the adjacent properties have single family homes constructed upon them. The petitioners state that the subject property is not suitable by site acreage nor site usage for current modern row crop farming practices. The petitioners believe the construction of a single family home would be consistent with the adjacent rural residential uses. Yorkville Comprehensive Plan Yorkville’s current 2016 Comprehensive Plan designation for this property is agricultural which is intended to allow for farming and open space uses as well as single family dwellings on large lots related to agricultural use. The proposed single family home would meet this criterion. Additionally, the plan states that environmentally sensitive areas such as tree groves, wetlands, and poorly drained areas will be protected from development during the Comprehensive Plan’s time horizon. The petitioner has attached a Natural Resource Information Executive Summary to their application which includes a Kendall County Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA). The LESA determines the suitability of a land use change or zoning request as it relates to agricultural land. The results of the assessment concluded that the property is considered to need a low level of protection. This means that the change in land use will have a small effect on surrounding agricultural uses. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Jason Engberg, Senior Planner CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Date: February 26, 2018 Subject: PZC 2018-01 – Kendall County Case #18-05 (Rezone) 1.5 Mile Review Integrated Transportation Plan Yorkville’s Integrated Transportation Plan (ITP) designates a trail along the Aux Sable Creek and one along the north side of Walker Road. In the future if the construction of these trails becomes a reality, the City would like to make it aware at this moment to the interested parties that there are future plans for these trails though the property and right-of-way designations may be requested in the future. Comments Staff has reviewed the request for rezone and is seeking input from the Economic Development Committee on this County Case. This one and a half mile review will be on the agenda for the March 13, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Any comments from the EDC will be given to the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider whether or not to formally oppose this request. Attachments 1. Application with Attachments ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier –February 20, 2018 Page 1 of 3 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, BUILDING & ZONING 111 West Fox Street  Room 203 Yorkville, IL  60560 (630) 553-4141 Fax (630) 553-4179 Petition 18-05 Keith and Kathleen Warpinski Map Amendment Rezoning Property from A-1 to R-1 INTRODUCTION Keith and Kathleen Warpinski are requesting a map amendment rezoning the subject property from A -1 to R- 1 in order to have the ability to construct a single-family home on the property. SITE INFORMATION PETITIONER: Keith and Kathleen Warpinski ADDRESS: Between 9239 and 9125 Walker Road LOCATION: 0.31 Miles East of Route 47 on the North Side of Walker Road ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier –February 20, 2018 Page 2 of 3 TOWNSHIP: Kendall PARCEL #: 05-21-400-011 LOT SIZE: 6.57 acres EXITING LAND USE: Residential/Agricultural ZONING: A-1 Agricultural District LRMP: Land Use Agricultural Roads Walker Road is a County Road classified as a Minor Collector Road Trails Trails are planned along Walker Road and along the Middle Aux Sable Creek Floodplain/ Wetlands The Middle Aux Sable Creek is located near the northern property line REQUESTED ACTION: Map Amendment Rezoning Property from A-1 to R-1 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 13.07 – Map Amendment Procedures SURROUNDING LAND USE Location Adjacent Land Use Adjacent Zoning Land Resource Management Plan Zoning within ½ Mile North Agricultural A-1 Rural Res.; Trans. Corridor A-1; A-1 SU South Agricultural/Residential A-1 Rural Estate Res.; Comm.; Trans. Corridor A-1 East Agricultural/Residential A-1 Rural Res. A-1 West Agricultural/Residential A-1 Rural Res.; Comm.; Trans. Corridor A-1; B-3 Two (2) houses are located east of the property; one (1) house is located to the south of the property; one (1) house is located west of the property. Commonwealth Edison also has a planned area along the east side of Route 47. PHYSICAL DATA ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT EcoCAT Report submitted and consultation was terminated. NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY LESA Score was 200 indicating a low level of protection. ACTION SUMMARY KENDALL TOWNSHIP Petition information was sent to Kendall Township 2.20.18. ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier –February 20, 2018 Page 3 of 3 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE Petition information was sent to the United City of Yorkville 2.20.18. GENERAL INFORMATION The petitioner desires the map amendment in order to have the ability to construct a house on the property at some point in the future. The subject property does not have an allocation for the construction of a home and does not possess forty (40) acres. Therefore, a map amendment is required in order to construct a home onsite. The petitioner does not believe that the property is large enough for farming. Pictures of the property are included. The Land Resource Management Plan calls for this area to be rural residential in the future. Existing single - family homes are located around the subject property. For these reasons, Staff does not believe that the approval of this request would constitute spot zoning. The property is currently for sale. BUILDING CODES Any new homes or accessory structures would be required to meet applicable building codes. ACCESS The property fronts Walker Road. Pending comments from Kendall Township, Staff has no concerns regarding the ability of Walker Road to support a proposed home at this location. ODORS No new odors are foreseen. LIGHTING Any new lighting would be for residential use only. Staff does not foresee any concerns regarding lighting. SCREENING No fencing or buffer is presently planned for the property. Any new fences or plantings would be for a residential use. Any new fences would have to follow applicable regulations. STORMWATER The northern portion of the property touches the Middle Aux Sable Creek. Any new homes would have to be constructed per Kendall County’s Stormwater Management Ordinance. UTILITIES Electricity is near the property. A new well and septic system would have to obtain applicable permits. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed map amendment. ATTACHMENTS 1. Application Materials (Including the Petitioner’s Findings of Fact, Plat, and EcoCat) 2. NRI Executive Report 3. Aerial 4. Looking North 5. East Side of Property 6. West Property Line (Spring Picture) 7. Looking South (Spring Picture) NATURAL RESOURCE INFORMATION (NRI) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT: 1703 June 2017 Petitioner: Keith & Kathleen Warpinski Contact: Attorney Daniel J. Kramer Prepared by: Kendall County Soil & Water Conservation District 7775A Route 47 • Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Phone: (630)553-5821 x3 • Fax: (630)553-7442 www.kendallswcd.org 1703 Executive Summary June 12, 2017 Petitioner: Keith & Kathleen Warpinski Contact Person: Attorney Daniel J. Kramer County or Municipality the petition is filled with: Kendall County Location of Parcel: SE¼ Section 21 T.36N.-R.7E. (Kendall Township) of the 3rd Principal Meridian in Kendall Co., IL Project or Subdivision Name: N/A Existing Zoning & Land Use: A-1 Agricultural; Vegetation, Trees Proposed Zoning & Land Use: R-1; Single Family Home Proposed Water Source: Well Proposed Type of Sewage Disposal System: Septic Proposed Type of Storm Water Management: None Size of Site: 6.9 acres Land Evaluation Site Assessment (LESA) Score: 200 Natural Resource Concerns Soil Map: SOIL INFORMATION: Based on information from the United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) 2008 Kendall County Soil Survey, this parcel is shown to contain the following soil types (please note this does not replace the need for or results of onsite soil testing; please refer to onsite soil test results for planning/engineering purposes): Table 1: Map Unit Soil Name Drainage Class Hydrologic Group Hydric Designation Farmland Designation 60C2 La Rose silt loam, 5-10% slopes, eroded Moderately well drained C Non-hydric Farmland of Statewide Importance 145B Saybrook silt loam, 2-5% slopes Moderately well drained C Non-hydric Prime Farmland 152A Drummer silty clay loam, 0-2% slopes Poorly Drained B/D Hydric Prime Farmland if drained Hydrologic Soil Groups: Soils have been classified into four (A, B, C, D) hydrologic groups based on runoff characteristics due to rainfall. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second letter is for undrained areas.  Hydrologic group A: Soils have a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.  Hydrologic group B: Soils have a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet, consist chiefly of moderately deep to deep, moderately well drained to well drained soils that have a moderately fine to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.  Hydrologic group C: Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission.  Hydrologic group D: Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. Hydric Soils: A soil that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part of the soil profile. Of the soils found onsite, 152A Drummer silty clay loam is classified as a hydric soil. Prime Farmland: Prime farmland is land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for agricultural production. Prime farmland soils are an important resource to Kendall County and some of the most productive soils in the United States occur locally. Of the soils found onsite, two are designated as prime farmland: 152A Drummer silty clay loam and 145B Saybrook silt loam. Table 2: Map Unit Surface Runoff Water Table Ponding Flooding 60C2 High February – April Upper Limit: 2.0’-3.5’ Lower Limit: 2.2’-4.0’ February – April Surface Water Depth & Duration: -- Frequency: None February – April None 145B Low February – April Upper Limit: 2.0’-3.5’ Lower Limit: 2.2’-3.8’ February – April Surface Water Depth & Duration: -- Frequency: None February – April None 152A Negligible January - May Upper Limit: 0.0’-1.0’ Lower Limit: >6.0’ January – May Brief, Frequent Surface Water Depth: 0.0-0.5’ January - May None Surface Runoff: Refers to the loss of water from an area by flow over the land surface. Surface runoff classes are based upon slope, climate and vegetative cover. Indicates relative runoff for very specific conditions (it is assumed that the surface of the soil is bare and that the retention of surface water resulting from irregularities in the ground surface is minimal). Ponding: Ponding is standing water in a closed depression. Unless a drainage system is installed, the water is removed only by percolation, transpiration or evaporation. Duration is expressed as very brief (less than 2 days), brief (2 to 7 days), long (7 to 30 days), very long (more than 30 days). Frequency is expressed as none (ponding is not probable), rare (unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions), occasional (occurs, on average, once or less in 2 years) and frequent (occurs, on average, more than once in 2 years). Flooding: Temporary inundation of an area caused by overflowing streams, by runoff from adjacent slopes, or by tides. Water standing for short periods after rainfall or snowmelt is not considered flooding, and water standing in swamps and marshes is considered ponding rather than flooding. Duration expressed as brief is 2 to 7 days and a frequent frequency means that it is likely to occur often under normal weather conditions. SOIL LIMITATIONS: According to the USDA-NRCS, soil properties influence the development of building sites, including the selection of the site, the design of the structure, construction, performance after construction and maintenance. This report gives ratings for proposed uses in terms of limitations and restrictive features. The tables list only the most restrictive features. Ratings are based on the soil in an undisturbed state, that is, no unusual modification occurs other than that which is considered normal practice for the rated use. Even though soils may have limitations, an engineer may alter soil features or adjust building plans for a structure to compensate for most degrees of limitations. The final decision in selecting a site for a particular use generally involves weighing the costs for site preparation and maintenance.  Not Limited: Indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use; good performance and low maintenance can be expected.  Somewhat Limited: Indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning, design or installation; fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected.  Very Limited: Indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or expensive installation procedures; poor performance and high maintenance can be expected. Conventional Septic System Rating Criteria: The factors considered are the characteristics and qualities of the soil that affect the limitations for absorbing waste from domestic sewage disposal systems. Soils that are deemed unsuitable for installation of an on-site sewage disposal system per the Kendall County Subdivision Control Ordinance may necessitate the installation of a non-conventional onsite sewage disposal system. For more information please contact: Kendall County Health Department located at 811 W. John Street, Yorkville, IL; (630)553-9100 ext. 8026. Limitations are listed below for dwellings with basements, dwellings without basements, and conventional sewage disposal systems. Please note this information is based on information compiled as part of the USDA- NRCS 2008 Soil Survey of Kendall County, IL and the Kendall County Subdivision Control Ordinance; this does not replace the need for site specific soil testing or results of onsite soil testing. Table 3: Building Limitations Soil Type Dwellings with Basements Dwellings without Basements Small Commercial Building Onsite Conventional Sewage Disposal System 60C2 Very Limited: Depth to saturated zone Somewhat Limited: Depth to saturated zone Somewhat Limited: Slope Depth to saturated zone Suitable 145B Somewhat Limited: Depth to saturated zone Somewhat Limited: Shrink-swell Somewhat Limited: Shrink-swell Suitable 152A Very Limited: Depth to saturated zone Shrink-swell Very Limited: Depth to saturated zone Shrink-swell Very Limited: Depth to saturated zone Shrink-swell Unsuitable Reason to avoided: Wet 0 20 40 60 80 100 Dwellings with Basements Dwellings without Basements Small Commercial Building Conventional Septic System % of Soil Type of Improvement SOIL LIMITATIONS Not Limited Somewhat Limited Very Limited 5 Building Limitations Map: Figure 2a: Dwellings with Basements Figure 2b: Dwellings without Basements 6 Kendall County Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA): Decision-makers in Kendall County use the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) system to determine the suitability of a land use change and/or a zoning request as it relates to agricultural land. The LESA system was developed by the United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) and takes into consideration local conditions such as physical characteristics of the land, compatibility of surrounding land-uses, and urban growth factors. The LESA system is a two-step procedure that includes:  LAND EVALUATION (LE) – The soils of a given area are rated and placed in groups ranging from the best to worst suited for a stated agriculture use, cropland or forestland. The best group is assigned a value of 100 and all other groups are assigned lower values. The Land Evaluation is based on data from the Kendall County Soil Survey. The Kendall County Soil and Water Conservation District is responsible for this portion of the LESA system.  SITE ASSESSMENT (SA) – The site is numerically evaluated according to important factors that contribute to the quality of the site. Each factor selected is assigned values in accordance with the local needs and objectives. The Kendall County LESA Committee is responsible for this portion of the LESA system. Table 4a: Land Evaluation Computation The Land Evaluation score for this site is 98, indicating that this site is predominately prime farmland well suited for agricultural production. Table 4b: Site Assessment Computation A. Agricultural Land Uses Points 1. Percentage of area in agricultural uses within 1.5 miles of site. (20-10-5-0) 20 2. Current land use adjacent to site. (30-20-15-10-0) 20 3. Percentage of site in agricultural production in any of the last 5 years. (20-15-10-5-0) 0 4. Size of site. (30-15-10-0) 0 B. Compatibility / Impact on Uses 1. Distance from city or village limits. (20-10-0) 20 2. Consistency of proposed use with County Land Resource Management Concept Plan and/or municipal comprehensive land use plan. (20-10-0) 0 3. Compatibility of agricultural and non-agricultural uses. (15-7-0) 7 C. Existence of Infrastructure 1. Availability of public sewage system. (10-8-6-0) 10 2. Availability of public water system. (10-8-6-0) 10 3. Transportation systems. (15-7-0) 7 4. Distance from fire protection service. (10-8-6-2-0) 8 Site Assessment Score: 102 Land Evaluation Value: 98 + Site Assessment Value: 102 = LESA Score: 200 The LESA Score for this site is 200 which indicates a low level of protection for the proposed project site. Note: Selecting the project site with the lowest total points will generally protect the best farmland located in the most viable areas and maintain and promote the agricultural industry in Kendall County. Soil Type Value Group Relative Value Acres Product (Relative Value x Acres) 60C2 5 82 0.3 24.6 145B 2 94 1.9 178.6 152A 1 100 4.7 470.0 Totals 6.9 673.2 LE Score LE= 673.2/6.9 LE=97.6 (98) LESA SCORE LEVEL OF PROTECTION 0-200 Low 201-225 Medium 226-250 High 251-300 Very High 7 Wetlands: The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s National Wetland Inventory map does not indicate the presence of a wetland on the project site. If a wetland is present and will be impacted by the project, a wetland delineation specialist, who is recognized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, should determine the exact boundaries and value of the wetlands. Floodplain: A portion of the parcel is located within the floodplain. Sediment and Erosion Control: Development on this site should include an erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with local, state and federal regulations. Soil erosion on construction sites is a resource concern because suspended sediment from areas undergoing development is a primary nonpoint source of water pollution. Please consult the Illinois Urban Manual (http://www.aiswcd.org/illinois-urban-manual/) for appropriate best management practices. 8 LAND USE OPINION: The Kendall County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) Board has reviewed the proposed development plans for Petitioner Keith & Kathleen Warpinski for the proposed Warpinski project. This parcel is located in Section 21 of Kendall Township (T.36N.-R.7E. of the 3rd Principal Meridian) in Kendall County. Based on the information provided by the petitioner and a review of natural resource related data available to the Kendall County SWCD, the SWCD Board has the following opinions and recommendations. The Kendall County SWCD has always had the opinion that Prime Farmland should be preserved whenever feasible. A land evaluation, which is a part of the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) was conducted on this parcel. The soils on this parcel scored a 99 out of a possible 100 points indicating the soils found on the project site are predominately prime farmland well suited for agricultural production. Overall, the LESA score was 200 indicating a low level of protection as selecting a project site with the lowest total points will generally protect the best farmland located in the most viable areas and maintain and promote the agricultural industry in Kendall County. Of the soils identified onsite, two (145B and 152A) are designated as prime farmland; the remaining soil (60C2) is noted as farmland of statewide importance. For proposed land uses, soils can have potential limitations. This report indicates that for soils located on the parcel, 72% of the soils are very limited for dwellings with basements; 68% of the soils are very limited for dwellings without basements, small commercial building and conventional septic systems. This information is based on the soil in an undisturbed state and does not replace the need for site specific soil testing. Some soil reclamation, special design, or maintenance may be required to obtain suitable soil conditions to support development with significant limitations. Additionally, if the scope of the project includes the use of onsite septic systems, please consult with the Kendall County Health Department. This site is located within the Illinois River Watershed and Middle Branch Aux Sable Creek subwatershed. This development should include a soil erosion sediment control plan to be implemented during construction. Sediment may become a primary non-point source of pollution. Eroded soils during the construction phase can create unsafe conditions on roadways, degrade water quality and destroy aquatic ecosystems lower in the watershed. For intense project uses it may be necessary to have a drainage tile survey completed on the parcel to locate any subsurface drainage tile if suspected onsite. Drainage tile expedites drainage and facilitates farming. It is imperative that these drainage tiles remain undisturbed. Impaired tile may affect a few acres or hundreds of acres of drainage. The information that is included in this Natural Resources Information Report is to assure the Land Developers take into full consideration the limitations of that land that they wish to develop. Guidelines and recommendations are also a part of this report and should be considered in the planning process. The Natural Resource Information Report is required by the Illinois Soil and Water Conservation District Act (Ill. Complied Statues, Ch. 70, Par 405/22.02a). R D .PENMAN-002 -003 -004 -006 -007 -013-014-011-010 -008 -005 3 7 .3 9 1273.842 8 1 .0 9 78..84 610700 R13106 6 2 0 4 1401.21270 691.65 4 0 7 .534.2711.43 7 0 .3 28.43414 3 5 1 5 8 ..7 1.1 5178.4 41259.591 3 4 M id d le A u x S a b le C r e e k 38.50 6.05 5.005.005.0074.18 3.01 6.575.20 5.34 80.34 W a l k e r R d Penman RdMiddle Aux Sable Creek ´ This work is provided as is, without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The inform ation represented m ay contain proprietary and confidential property of Kendall County Illinois.Under United S tates Copyright protection laws you m ay not use, reproduce, or distribute any part of this document without prior written perm ission. To obtain written perm ission please contact Kendall County GIS at 111 W Fox St, Yorkville, IL 60560. 05-21-400-011Kendall Twp.Kendall County Illinois 0 140 280 420 Feet 1 inch = 100 feet Created : 02/22/2017Aerial: Spring 2016 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Old Business #1 Tracking Number EDC 2018-15 Developer Deposit Report/Ordinance Economic Development Committee - March 6, 2018 N/A N/A N/A Approval. Discussion of engineering service fees related to commercial development projects. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department 1 Summary Per direction from the Economic Development Committee at last month’s meeting, staff has revised its recommendations for minimum engineering deposit amount for projects based upon development area acreage and engineering review type. For your consideration, below is a summary of the comments provided to staff during the February meeting; a chart comparing of the existing engineering deposit fees with that of the previously proposed and the currently proposed fees; and a draft ordinance codifying the proposed fee amendments. Staff Comments/Recommendations At the February 6th meeting, feedback was provided to staff to reduce the originally proposed initial deposit requirements based upon a percentage of the overall estimated amount for engineering plan review and construction services (i.e., 5.5% of the approved engineer’s estimate of construction cost for all land improvements). There were also suggestions to lower the previously proposed minimum deposit amounts; allow for discretion by the Community Development Director to either lower minimum deposits based on project scope/use or provide a separate reduced deposit amount for such projects; and provide an upfront engineering fee estimate if the developer submitted an engineers estimate of cost for completion (EEOC) of the land improvements. It would be stipulated to the developer that the fee estimate maybe subject to change, as the City engineer would have to approve the EEOC. Based upon these comments, staff’s revised recommendations are as follows: • Revised minimum escrow deposit amounts. The intent is to have the initial deposit cover the cost of a preliminary due diligence meeting and the generation of first round plan review comments. This deposit would typically be in the range of 1% – 1.5% of the project construction cost for all land improvements. Additionally, this fee would apply to new construction development and any development requiring land use approvals (e.g. special use, rezoning, planned unit development, annexation, final plat, etc.) An example of the revised deposit amount is provided below: Current Engineering Deposit Originally Proposed Engineering Deposit Revised Proposed Engineering Deposit • <1 acre = $1,000.00 • >1 acre but <10 acres = $2,500.00 • >10 acres but < 40 acres = $5,000.00 • > 40 acres but < 100 acres = $10,000.00 • > 100 acres = $20,000.00 • <1 acre = $5,000.00 • >1 acre but <10 acres = $12,500.00 • >10 acres but < 40 acres = $25,000.00 • > 40 acres but < 100 acres = $50,000.00 • > 100 acres = $100,000.00 • <1 acre = $5,000.00 • >1 acre but <10 acres = $10,000.00 • >10 acres but < 40 acres = $15,000.00 • > 40 acres but < 100 acres = $20,000.00 > 100 acres = $25,000.00 • Small-Scale or Limited Scope Project Minimum Escrow Deposits. For those developments that require a limited scope of engineering review without the need for land use approvals (e.g. commercial building additions, parking lot expansion, driveway curb cut, etc.), staff recommends Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Brad Sanderson, EEI, City Engineer Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director Date: February 22, 2018 Subject: Developer Deposit Report/Ordinance 2 a minimum engineering deposit of $2,500.00. These projects typically do not require a due diligence meeting and generally arise as part of a building permit application. The recommended deposit is estimated to cover at least two (2) rounds of plan review comments and the bond approval/release process, if applicable. • Provide an upfront engineering fee estimate. This estimate would be provided as part of the initial due diligence meeting and will include the plan review, inspection services and administrative close out fees for the project utilizing a five and one-half percent (5.5%) calculation based on the approved engineer’s estimate of construction cost for all land improvements. • Codification of Fees. The City Attorney has prepared the attached ordinance which codifies the proposed fee amendments in Title 11: Subdivision Control Chapter 8: Fee Schedule. The amendment to the Subdivision Control Ordinance will address the revised minimum escrow deposits for new construction development and development requiring land use approvals. Further Direction Staff is also seeking direction regarding the existing Coordination Fee (0.35% of EEOC) and the Administration Fee (1.75% of EEOC). These fees were initially designed to cover in-house City staff time in the processing of engineering related projects and provided direct revenue to the City, aside from application fees for development projects. Should we continue to collect these fees in addition to the proposed new fee structure? Per the current Ordinance, the Coordination Fee was used as a pass through fee for engineering services related to new subdivisions, platting or replatting of existing subdivisions when completed solely by an outside consultant. In this scenario, the then in-house City Engineer would preliminarily review plans and make determination if an outside consultant would be required for review. If so, the in-house engineer would coordinate the distribution of the plans to the outside consultant and provide all review comments to the developer/applicant. Since the City has moved to exclusively using an outside consultant for engineering review, there is limited preliminary review of engineering plans by City staff prior to passing along to the consultant or coordination of review comments with the developer/applicant. The Administrative Fee, approved via a resolution, was intended to cover the cost of services provided by the the Public Works Department and Administrative Staff prior to the recording of a final plat. This fee would only affect new development projects which require the subdivision of land and typically would require an entitlement approval review process (planned unit development, special use, etc). While most of the administrative staff time in preparing the entitlement review process is covered as part of the application fee, and a majority of the Public Works Department review and inspection services are now handled by the engineering consultant, it may not be necessary to collect this fee going forward. Staff has consulted with the Public Works Department and City Attorney and have recommended in the attached draft ordinance repealing the previous ordinance and resolution effectively removing these fees. Next Steps If the proposed revisions and draft ordinance meets the satisfaction of the Economic Development Committee, this matter will be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a public hearing regarding the proposed text amendment to the Subdivision Control Ordinance. A public hearing notice will be placed in the March 16th edition of the Beacon Newspaper for the Planning and Zoning Commission April 11, 2018 meeting. Should the committee have any questions regarding the revised recommendations proposed, staff will be available to discuss in greater detail at Tuesday night’s meeting. Ordinance No. 2018-____ Page 1 Ordinance No. 2018-_____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS, AMENDING THE REQUIREMENTS IN THE YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION CONTROL ORDINANCE REGARDING ESCROW DEPOSITS FOR ENGINEERING REVIEW FEES WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the “City”) is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11-7-1 of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance the Mayor and City Council (the “Corporate Authorities”) may initiate amendments to the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities authorized the filing of amendments to the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance regarding escrow deposits for engineering review fees; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission convened and held a public hearing on the 11th day of April, 2018, to consider the request to amend the Subdivision Control Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission after the close of the hearing approved findings of fact and made a recommendation to the Corporate Authorities that the proposed amendments be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1: That Resolution 2002-27 entitled, RESOLUTION AMENDING CITY ORDINANCE WITH REGARD TO PAYMENT OF DEVELOPER DEPOSITS AND ENGINEERING FEES, and Ordinance 2006-11 entitled, ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY ORDINANCE WITH REGARD TO PAYMENT OF COORDINATION FEE be and are hereby repealed. Section 2: That Section 11-8-2, FEES, and 11-8-3, COORDINATION FEE, of the Yorkville City Code, as amended, be and are hereby repealed. Section 3: That Sections 11-8-2 and 11-8-3 be and are hereby added to the Yorkville City Code to read as follows: “11-8-2: ENGINEERING REVIEW FEE ESCROW DEPOSIT A. An engineering review fee escrow deposit shall be required for all new construction projects and any development requiring land use approvals including but not limited to a special use, rezoning, planned unit development, annexation, or subdivision, or for those limited scope Ordinance No. 2018-____ Page 2 projects that require a limited scope of engineering review without land use approvals. The engineering review fee escrow deposit shall be for the reimbursement of any City fees and expenses for the project from the initial contact by the applicant to the time of final approval. B. The city shall provide an initial engineering fee estimate that will include the plan review, inspection services and administrative fees for the project which shall be based on a five and one-half percent (5.5%) of the approved engineer’s estimate of construction cost for all land improvements. C. Not including a limited scope of development, the initial minimum engineering review fee escrow deposit for new construction projects and any development requiring land use approvals including but not limited to a special use, rezoning, planned unit development, annexation, or subdivision shall be: Size of development Escrow Deposit Less than 1 acre $5,000.00 Greater than 1 acre but less than 10 acres $10,000.00 Greater than 10 acres but less than 40 acres $15,000.00 Greater than 40 acres but less than 100 acres $20,000.00 Greater than 100 acres $25,000.00 D. The initial minimum engineering review fee escrow deposit for a limited scope development that requires a limited scope of engineering review without a land use approval shall be $2,500.00. 11-8-3: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. The City reserves the right to charge and collect fees on an hourly basis for complex work or time-consuming developments if the time expended on a particular project exceeds the fees required herein. B. In the event that an escrow deposit described in Sections 11-8-2 is reduced to a sum of 10% or less of the original deposit, the City Administrator shall request an additional deposit for the reasonably expected costs to be incurred by the City for the completion of the project.” Section 4: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its passage, publication, and approval as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this ______ day of __________________, 2018. ______________________________ City Clerk Ordinance No. 2018-____ Page 3 CARLO COLOSIMO ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ ARDEN JOE PLOCHER ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ SEAVER TARULIS ________ ALEX HERNANDEZ ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this ______ day of __________________, 2018. ____________________________________ Mayor 1 Summary As a result of a recent letter from the developer of the Heartland Meadows subdivision regarding engineering service fees, staff is providing an overview of the historical and current policies for collecting such fees and an analysis of fees paid for recent Yorkville projects. We have also provided a comparison of surrounding communities’ practice of charging engineering related fees. It is the intention of staff to have an open discussion with the Economic Development Committee (EDC) of how staff currently requests, administer, and replenish engineering related development fees and deposits for projects and if new procedures should be considered. Background In 2002, City Council approved a resolution (Res. 2002-27) establishing the payment of developer deposits and engineering review fees for all land development applications and permits. These fees were implemented to cover the expense of in-house engineering staff to review and administrative services associated with private development. The resolution assessed Engineering review fees for all new subdivisions, platting and re-platting of existing subdivisions, or for building permit applications where engineering review is necessary. It also required the fee be charged at time of initial contact to final plat and/or plan approval used to cover all normal city expenses. The breakdown of the fees will be as followed: FEE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Engineering Review Fee Cost for services related to plan reviews. • 1.25% of the approved engineer’s estimate of cost of all land improvements (public and private) • $500 deposit for Concept Plan Review Engineering Deposit In addition to the plan review fee, this fee is required at time of application for site plan approved based upon the size of the development. • <1 acre = $1,000.00 • >1 acre but <10 acres = $2,500.00 • >10 acres but < 40 acres = $5,000.00 • > 40 acres but < 100 acres = $10,000.00 • > 100 acres = $20,000.00 Administrative/Inspection Fee Covers costs of services provided by the Public Works Department and Administrative staff. This fee is due prior to recording of Final Plat. 1.75% of the approved engineer’s estimate of cost of all land improvements (public and private – including mass earth grading, private storm sewer, parking areas and trails) Additionally, the resolution allows for the City the right to charge fees on an hourly basis for complex work or time consuming developments with City Council approval, if the time expended on a particular development project exceeds the percentage fees set out above. These fees are also applicable to petitions for map amendments (rezoning), variances and special uses. Incidentally, in 2006 the City passed Ord. 2006-11 which assessed a subsequent Coordination Fee of 0.35% of the engineer’s estimate of cost of all land improvements. This fee was used as a pass- Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Brad Sanderson, EEI, City Engineer Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director Date: January 9, 2017 Subject: Developer Deposit Report/Ordinance 2 through fee for engineering services related to new subdivisions, platting or replatting of existing subdivisions when completed solely by an outside consultant. Current Policy Application The City utilized the above engineering review fee policy from 2002 until early 2011 when all in- house engineering staff was let go and replaced with the current outside consultant, Engineering Enterprise Incorporated (EEI). Since engaging EEI for the City’s engineering services, we have honored those developments which prepaid the Administrative/Inspection Fee at time of Final Plat recordation under the former policy and have not charged fees for typical follow-up engineering services, such as site inspections, punch list reviews and letter of credit/bond reduction requests. However, all new requests for engineering related development approvals, plan reviews and inspections are charged at an hourly rate and drawn down upon from an initial deposit submitted by the applicant based upon the schedule established in Resolution 2002-27, as stated in the table above. Since 2011, every application for a development project requiring engineering plan review and/or inspection services, applicants are required to complete and sign an “Acknowledgement of Financial Responsibility” form. This form explains the initial fee and deposit account process and specifies the deposit account is intended to cover all actual expenses occurred as a result of reviewing and processing their plans or permit request. Periodically throughout the project review/approval process, staff provides the applicant with an invoice summary reflecting the charges made against the account. At any time the balance of the fund account falls below ten percent (10%) of the original deposit amount, the applicant is requested to provide additional funds equal to one-hundred percent (100%) of the initial deposit if subsequent reviews/fees related to the project are required. If replenishment is not made, the City may suspend action on the project or permit until the account is fully refunded. Conversely, if a surplus of funds remains in the deposit account at the completion of the project, the city will refund the balance to the applicant. Analysis of Recent Projects Staff has compiled the following tables of all eleven (11) commercial/industrial development projects reviewed by the City’s engineering consultant, Engineering Enterprises Incorporated (EEI) during calendar year 2017. The tables compare the fees charged by EEI on an hourly basis versus what would have been charged by the City if in-house engineers used fees in Resolution 2002-27 for completed projects and projects under construction. Project Engineering Services Engineering Fees Charged 1 Fees If Paid Under Resolution 2002-27 Actual % of EEOC Charged Remarks COMPLETED PROJECTS Fountainview Subdivision Plan Review $12,291 EEOC =$479,822 6.20% Complete. Multiple rounds of plan review required; Construction not completed in a timely manner; multiple punchlist inspections required. Construction Svcs. $16,426 1.25% x EEOC = $5,998 Expenses $665 1.75% x EEOC = $8,397 Sub-consultant $484 TOTAL = $14,395 TOTAL $29,866 Yorkville Business Park (Lot 3) Plan Review $5,857 EEOC= $448,239 3.40% Complete. Construction Svcs. $9,036 1.25% x EEOC = $5,603 Expenses $353 1.75% x EEOC = $7,844 Sub-consultant $203 TOTAL = $13,447 TOTAL $15,449 Kendall Crossing (Lot 3) Plan Review $6,264 EEOC = $203,365 8.50% Complete. Increased construction fees due to connections to existing utilities; multiple water main pressure tests failed and had to be re-tested; issue with sanitary sewer connection that took time to resolve. Construction Svcs. $10,297 1.25% x EEOC = $2,542 Expenses $503 1.75% x EEOC = $3,559 Sub-consultant $135 TOTAL = $6,101 TOTAL $17,199 1 Fee includes billed labor, expenses & sub-consultant fee, if any, as of 12/31/2017 3 203 Commercial Drive Plan Review $1,641 EEOC =$2,280 147.50% Complete. EEOC is artificially low, as it only covered erosion control. The overall project required reviews and inspections for grading, stormwater, SESC and landscaping. Construction Svcs. $1,500 1.25% x EEOC = $29 Expenses $34 1.75% x EEOC = $40 Sub-consultant $190 TOTAL = $69 TOTAL $3,365 Project Engineering Services Engineering Fees Charged2 Fees If Paid Under Resolution 2002-27 Actual % of EEOC Charged Remarks UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Yorkville Christian HS Plan Review $31,980 EEOC =$900,000 (est) 4.50% 20% Complete; grading only; Complicated site plan and off-site drainage concerns; Exterior road improvements required; Site plan has had multiple changes; project started and then restarted. SESC on-going concerns Construction Svcs. $8,445 1.25% x EEOC = $11,250 Expenses $398 1.75% x EEOC = $15,750 Sub-consultant $0 TOTAL = $27,000 TOTAL $40,823 Heartland Meadows Plan Review $28,359 EEOC =$2,004,791 2.30% 50-60% Complete; involved extensive city street work to install water main & sanitary sewer services to existing city utilities. Improvements to existing streets required per agreements. Extra inspections required vs normal green development. Construction Svcs. $15,864 1.25% x EEOC = $25,060 Expenses $1,184 1.75% x EEOC = $35,084 Sub-consultant $795 TOTAL = $60,144 TOTAL $46,202 KBL Community Center (Go For It Sports) Plan Review $9,309 EEOC =$905,676 2.30% 95% Complete; minor punchlist work to be completed in the spring. Construction Svcs. $10,717 1.25% x EEOC = $11,321 Expenses $671 1.75% x EEOC = $15,849 Sub-consultant $0 TOTAL = $27,170 TOTAL $20,697 Marin Bros. Addition (1951 Rena Lane) Plan Review $3,853 EEOC = $38,542 16.80% 99% Complete. EEOC is artificially low. The overall project required reviews and inspections for grading, stormwater, SESC and landscaping. Construction Svcs. $2,296 1.25% x EEOC = $482 Expenses $158 1.75% x EEOC = $674 Sub-consultant $169 TOTAL = $1,156 TOTAL $6,476 Cedarhurst Living Plan Review $11,663 EEOC = $819,941 2.80% 80-90% Complete. Multiple rounds of plan review required; majority of work has been inspected. Construction Svcs. $10,531 1.25% x EEOC = $10,249 Expenses $700 1.75% x EEOC = $14,349 Sub-consultant $0 TOTAL = $24,598 TOTAL $22,894 Casey’s Development Plan Review $8,657 EEOC = $692,689 1.30% 0% Complete; construction not started. Multiple rounds of plan review required; Construction Svcs. $0 1.25% x EEOC = $8,659 Expenses $0 1.75% x EEOC = $12,122 Sub-consultant $238 TOTAL = $20,781 TOTAL $8,895 Holiday Inn (Kendall Crossing) Plan Review $11,570 EEOC = $636,994 2.20% 20% Complete. Multiple rounds of plan review required; Construction Svcs. $1,981 1.25% x EEOC = $7,962 Expenses $41 1.75% x EEOC = $11,147 Sub-consultant $428 TOTAL = $19,109 TOTAL $14,020 Although there anomalies in both the completed projects and the projects under construction (203 Commercial Drive and Marin Bros. Addition), on average for the completed and near completed projects (excluding the anomalies), the engineering fees billed were approximately 5-6% of the engineers estimated cost of completion (EEOC) as compared to 3% if calculated under Resolution 2002-27. While a majority of the fees for these projects exceeded both the estimated plan review and construction services totals under Resolution 2002-27, the reasons for the difference varied depending on the scope of the project, the number of plan reviews needed for approval, artificially low estimates for land improvements, 2 Fee includes billed labor, expenses & sub-consultant fee, if any, as of 12/31/2017 4 or the need for outside consultant review; all of which can only be determined on a project-by-project basis and is not under the control of the reviewing engineer. Typical Consultant Services To further articulate the level of services the City is receiving by the engineering consultant as part of the plan review and inspection process, EEI has prepared the attached memo dated January 11, 2018 which lists of typical work items conducted during the course of development from plan review through construction and close-project out. There is also attached a sample plan review check lists for commercial developments. Additionally, EEI now coordinates the landscaping plan reviews for the City since the departure of Laura Schraw, former Director of Parks and Recreation, who was a registered and licensed landscape architect. The landscape reviews are conducted by a sub-consultant, Planning Resources, Inc. These fees are not accounted for in the hourly billings by EEI, but are rather invoiced separately at a rate of $95.00/hour and included in the final engineering project bill. Below is a 2017 fee comparison table of EEI and five (5) other engineering firms active in surrounding communities. The break down is by job title and lists the hourly rate each employee classification charges. In an effort to accurately compare the fee schedules of each firm, some grids within the table may be blank, indicating that particular job title does not exist within the corresponding firm. Job Classification EEI TAI WBK CBBEL H.R. Green Gewalt Hamilton (Sugar Grove) (Chicago) (St. Charles) (Rosemont) (Yorkville) (Vernon Hills) Expert Testimony $ 225 $ 250 Senior Principal $ 196 $ 224 $ 210 $ 257 $ 198 Principal $ 191 $ 224 $ 210 $ 232 $195 to $280 $ 198 Senior Project Manager $ 185 $ 214 $ 185 $ 191 $ 172 Project Manager $ 168 $ 189 $ 169 $ 155 $165 to $250 $ 170 Senior Project Engineer/Planner/Surveyor II $ 155 $ 179 $ 142 $ 152 $ 168 Senior Project Engineer/Planner/Surveyor I $ 145 $ 166 $ 148 Project Engineer/Planner/Surveyor $ 133 $ 149 $ 140 $ 138 Senior Engineer/Planner/Surveyor $ 121 $ 130 $ 117 $ 134 Engineer/Planner/Surveyor $ 111 $ 105 $ 98 $ 110 $110 to $180 $ 118 Associate Engineer/Planner/Surveyor $ 100 $ 110 $ 84 $ 110 $85 to $ 135 Senior Project Technician II $ 145 $ 155 $ 138 $ 180 $ 168 Senior Project Technician I $ 133 $ 134 $ 116 $ 148 $95 to $130 Project Technician $ 121 $ 122 $ 133 $ 124 Senior Technician $ 111 $ 109 $ 115 $ 114 Technician $ 100 $ 96 $ 97 $45 to $115 $ 100 Associate Technician $ 87 $ 81 $ 59 $ 74 Engineering/Land Surveying Intern $ 82 GIS Technician $ 67 $ 78 Administrative Assistant $ 80 $ 75 $ 62 $ 98 $55 to $115 $ 62 Sub-consultants Cost Cost + 5% Cost + 10% Cost + 10% Cost + 10% Cost + 10% Reimbursable Expenses Cost Cost + 5% Cost + 10% Cost + 12% Cost + 10% Cost + 10% Annual Escalator (NTE) Notice 5% 5% 5% Notice 5% 5 Typically, the majority of the time from EEI’s office for general plan reviews and construction services is billed at the Project Engineer rate of $133/hour. The highest rate billed by EEI is for the Senior Principal (Brad Sanderson) at $196/hour. Therefore, on average the hourly rate for a project is roughly $165/hour. If the same is true of the other firms, their average hourly rates would range between $168/hour to $199/hour. Surrounding Community Research Staff felt it would be beneficial to understand how surrounding and area communities charge for engineering services, either in-house or outsourced, to see if our current practices were in line with theirs. On the following page is a comparison table of surrounding communities which illustrate how in-house and out-sourced engineering fees are charged. Municipality In-House/ Out-Sourced Engineering Review/ Inspection Fee Remarks Aurora In-House 2.25% of engineers’ estimate Minimum fee $750. Includes fees for filing, plan review and inspections. Batavia In-House 0.75% to 4% of engineers’ estimate (higher for smaller projects) Minimum fee $50 - $6,000. Fees are for plan reviews only. Elburn Out-sourced Based on billable hours Deposit required to establish an escrow account. Minimum of $1,000. Montgomery Out-Sourced Based on billable hours Deposit required to establish an escrow account. Naperville In-House Residential- 1.5% of engineers’ estimate Commercial- $46/parking stall (1-50 stalls) $24/parking stall (51-100 stalls) $19/parking stall (100+) (minimum $380 fee) Commercial plan review is based upon number of parking stalls. North Aurora Out-Sourced Based on billable hours Deposit required to establish an escrow account. Oswego In-House & Out-Sourced Based on billable hours (when using consultant) Minimum $5,000 deposit is required. Plainfield In-House & Out-Sourced Based on billable hours (when using consultant) Minimum $5,000 deposit is required. Plano Out-Sourced Based on billable hours No escrow account required. Invoices are provided to applicant for immediate payment. Shorewood Out-Sourced Based on billable hours Deposit required to establish an escrow account. Minimum of $3,000. Sugar Grove Out-Sourced Flat Fee + Billable Hours Engineering Review & Services flat permit fee varies based on type of development and size ($480 - $8,400). Deposit required to establish an escrow account. Minimum of $10,000. Sycamore In-House Based on billable hours No deposit required. Hampshire Out-Sourced Based on billable hours Deposit required to establish an escrow account. Minimum of $5,000. Pingree Grove Out-Sourced Based on billable hours No escrow account required. Invoices are provided to applicant for immediate payment. Yorkville Out-Sourced Based on billable hours Deposit required to establish an escrow account. Minimum of $1,000. 6 Staff Comments/Recommendations From the research and analysis provided above, staff has the following observations: 1. The current engineering minimum deposit of $1,000 (based on project land area) is too low as compared to other surrounding communities, as well as the type and complexity of the development the City has experienced. The low deposit threshold results in frequent requests by the City for replenishment of funds from the applicant. 2. Current average billable hours for EEI ($165/hr) are on par or significantly lower than other firms working in surrounding communities, which range between $168/hour and $199/hour. Although, depending on the completeness and quality of plans submitted, as well as number of site plan revisions, EEI’s billed plan review fees have typically exceed the fee schedule established in Resolution 2002-27. Conversely, EEI’s billed inspection fees have been on average less than the fee charged under Resolution 2002-27. 3. For completed and nearly completed projects, the total engineering review fees tend to be 5-6% of the engineer’s estimate of construction versus the 3% charged for plan review and inspection services under Resolution 2002-27. 4. For the smaller scale projects (building additions, parking lot expansions, etc) the engineering plan review and inspection fees under Resolution 2002-27 are artificially low, as the determining factor is the engineer’s cost for land development which is typically limited to grading, erosion control and some limited landscaping. 5. Due to the loss of in-house staff to perform landscape plan reviews, additional costs are incurred by sub-consultants and passed through on the engineering project fees. 6. Yorkville is consistent with other area communities that out-source engineering plan or inspection services by billing an hourly rate and establishing an escrow account to draw down upon. Based upon these observations, it is staff’s recommendation to do the following: • Increase the minimum escrow deposit amounts. The intent is to have the initial deposit cover the cost of an initial due diligence meeting and the generation of first round plan review comments. This deposit would typically be in the range of 1% – 1.5% of the project construction cost for all land improvements. An example of the deposit amount increase is provided below: Current Engineering Deposit Proposed Engineering Deposit • <1 acre = $1,000.00 • >1 acre but <10 acres = $2,500.00 • >10 acres but < 40 acres = $5,000.00 • > 40 acres but < 100 acres = $10,000.00 • > 100 acres = $20,000.00 • <1 acre = $5,000.00 • >1 acre but <10 acres = $12,500.00 • >10 acres but < 40 acres = $25,000.00 • > 40 acres but < 100 acres = $50,000.00 • > 100 acres = $100,000.00 • Provide an upfront engineering fee estimate. This estimate would include the plan review, inspection services and administrative close out fees for the project utilizing a five and one-half percent (5.5%) calculation based on the approved engineer’s estimate of construction cost for all land improvements. A hypothetical scenario of how these recommendations would work is below: Developer A meets with the City staff and engineer to discuss a new project. A copy of the revised engineering deposit schedule is provided to Developer A at the conclusion of the meeting as part of the Commercial Development Packet (see attached). Upon submittal of a development approval application (special use, rezoning, PUD, etc), site grading or building permit, Developer A will have the option of: (A) Posting funds for an engineering deposit escrow account based upon the overall acreage of the development site; or 7 (B) Posting funds for the entire estimated engineering fees for the project based upon 5.5% of the engineer’s estimate of construction cost for all land improvements. In either scenario, the City Engineer will continue to bill the project monthly at an hourly rate whereby the invoices will be paid against the established escrow fund. The advantage in scenario “A” is the developer would pay a smaller up front deposit, but will likely receive multiple requests for replenishment of the escrow account throughout the development of the project. The advantage to scenario “B” is although the developer may pay a larger upfront deposit for the engineering plan review, inspection and administrative closeout services, there will be little to no requests for replenishments by the City to the developer throughout the development process. Additionally, providing the upfront estimate of fees allows the developer to better budget for these soft costs as part of their due diligence phase. Staff will be available to discuss the analysis provided in this memo and to garner feedback on the preliminary staff recommendations. Engineering Enterprises, Inc. Memo To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, P.E. Date: January 11, 2018 Re: Land Development Construction Observation Services EEI Job #: YO1800 As requested, we have developed a list of typical work items as it relates to construction activity with land development projects. Typically, our fees range from 1.5 to 3.0 % (higher for smaller projects) of the approved engineer’s estimate for these types of services, which includes part-time construction observation. The service level (and fees) are also dependant on the desires of the local community. Some communities require a higher level of expectations and service, while others may require something a little less. In addition, each project has unique issues which may affect the fees charged to the developer and as a result we have noted that our fees do vary from development to development. Also, to put things in perspective, the Illinois Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration have a cap on construction inspection fees on state and federally funded projects at 15% of construction costs. The logic behind the State/Federal position is that after the improvement is built the State and not the Contractor is responsible for all future life cycle costs. They have determined the need and value for full time inspection to protect the public investment. This concept of course rings true for the City as well since the City and not the developer is responsible for the future life cycle and maintenance costs. The typical work items associated with land development construction services are as follows:  Pre-Construction Meeting Coordination and Attendance  Construction Inspection and Observation o Earthwork / Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control (as required by NPDES Permit) o Underground (w/required testing)  Water Main  Sanitary Sewer  Lift Stations / Force Mains  Storm Sewer  Other Engineering Enterprises, Inc. Memo o Roadway  Curb and Gutter (w/required testing-IDOT Standard)  Aggregate Base Inspection (proof rolls, thickness verification)  Bituminous Binder and Base Courses (w/required testing-IDOT Standard)  Public Sidewalk and ADA Compliance o Street Light Inspection o Landscaping o Storm W ater Management Facility Construction o Wetlands o Daily Field Reports Prepared and Distributed  Private Utility Company Reviews  Coordination w/Developer and Contractors  Coordination w/other Agencies as Required  Coordination w/City Staff as Required  Addressing Resident Complaints  Letter of Credit (LOC) / Bond Reductions  Punchlist Inspections and Letters  As-Built Reviews  Sanitary/Storm Sewer Televising Review  City Atlas Map Updates  City Water Model Updates  Acceptance and GASB 34 Documentation Also for your information, we have attached a memo of understanding for Commercial/Industrial Site Inspections between our office and the building department, dated April 17, 2014. We have also attached copies of our construction observation checklists that have been developed, which generally detail what our staff is investigating when they perform site visits. If you have any questions on the provided material or if you need additional information, please let me know. pc: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works JAM, EEI The purpose of this memo is to define the responsibilities of EEI vs. the Building Department when it comes to construction observation on single lot commercial/industrial developments. EEI will be responsible for observing the construction of the following items: • Water service from the water main to the curb box, including tap • Sanitary service from the sewer main to and including the inspection manhole located outside the building • Any required testing of the sanitary or water main • Sidewalk within the City right-of-way, including any handicap ramps • Driveway entrance and exit aprons located in City right-of-way • Curb and gutter delineating driveway and parking lot area • Aggregate and asphalt for the parking lot area – No proof roles required • Parking lot striping • Traffic Control Signage • Landscaping • Site drainage, including storm sewer • Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Building Department will be responsible for all other site construction including: • Water line construction on the building side of the curb box • Sewer line construction on the building side of the inspection manhole • Sidewalk construction outside of the City right-of-way, including any handicap ramps • Parking lot and/or site lighting • Retaining wall construction • Stair construction • Trash enclosures construction • Building construction • All other construction not specifically mentioned in this memo Memorandum To: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Pete Ratos, Building Inspector Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: April 17, 2014 Subject: Commercial/Industrial Site Inspections Project ___________________________________ Project No. _________________ Contractor ______________________________________ Date: ________________ ITEM CHECK N/A CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION (Section 606) 1 Air Entrainment shall be 5% - 8%; Slump shall be 2-4 inches 2 Test cylinders shall be made and tested to ensure minimum compressive strength. 3 Contraction Joints shall be saw cut according to IDOT Standards (4hrs - 24 hrs) 4 Sawed joints shall be caulked immediately using polysulfide material 5 Membrane curing compound shall be IDOT Type 1 Clear Transparent Membrane Curing Compound ( sec 1022.01 ) 6 Sewer (S) and Water (W) shall be stamped in the face of the curb 7 All depression locations shall be staked out prior to curb placement. The contractor/owner shall be responsible for the exact locations of the depressions and replacing the curb where any depressions are found in the incorrect location. 8 All curb depressions for sidewalk ramps are to be constructed according to the IDOT Standard. (424001-07) 9 All utility trench crossings shall have two #4 Rebar constructed in the curb with a minimum length of 10' on either side of the trench. 10 Two 18" long, 3/4" diameter smooth dowels required at expansion joints 11 Concrete shall be tested on the first load and every 50 CY thereafter or additionally as required by the Engineer. 12 No additional water shall be added to the surface for finishing purposes. 13 Care shall be taken while broom finishing the surface of the Curb and Gutter. 14 No painting on curb after completion is allowed in the United City of Yorkville 15 All concrete curb and gutter shall be constructed according to the Illinois Standard Specifications. 16 All curb shall be constructed on a minimum of a 4" crushed aggregate base course. 17 Curb and Gutter can not be constructed on frozen subgrade. 18 Enusre IDOT protocol is followed for concrete pours below freezing temperatures. 19 Contractor/owner responsible for curb grades; provide visual inspection and contact contractor/owner if problems are suspected. 20 No honeycombing or voids will be allowed above or below finished grade. United City of Yorkville Curb and Gutter Checklist \\Milkyway\EEI_Storage\Docs\Public\Yorkville\Standard Notes, Forms and Checklists\Checklists\Subdivision Construction\COY Curb and Gutter Checklist Revised January 2018 Project ___________________________________ Project No. _________________ Contractor ______________________________________ Date: ________________ ITEM CHECK N/A ROAD CONSTRUCTION 1 After Subbase grade is achieved, a proof roll will be performed to determine the stability of the subbase. A representative of the City and/or City Engineer must be in attendance. If necessary, a geotechnical engineer will attend with the City's representative. 2 The subbase will be string lined to verify proper grade. 3 Verify proper compaction at structures and pipe crossings. 4 The contractor/developer will be responsible to provide a truck with the appropriate weight (6 wheeler with weight ≥ 12 tons; weight ticket required) to perform the proof roll. 5 Any unsuitable areas will be marked. It will be the responsibility of the contractor/owner to determine the method of corrective action for the failed areas. 6 A maximum of 1/2" deflection will be allowed during the subgrade proof roll (this does not include areas that "roll" away from the truck tires). 7 Any unsuitable material shall be replaced and the failed areas shall be re-proof rolled. 8 The base course shall be crushed aggregate CA-6 or approved equal. (Section 311) 9 The base course shall be proof rolled after final grade and compaction has been reached. 10 No deflection will be allowed on the base course proof roll. 11 The base course will be string lined to verify proper grade and slope. 12 Any unsuitable areas will be marked, it will be the responsibility of the contractor/owner to determine the method of corrective action for the failed areas. 13 Hot-Mix Asphalt Binder and Surface course shall be constructed according to the Illinois "Standard Specification for Road and Bride Construction" latest edition or as shown on the approved engineering plans. (Section 406) 14 Air temperature for bituminous binder course must be 40 degrees and rising. 15 Air temperature for bituminous surface course must be 45 degrees and rising. 16 Paving will not be allowed during inclement weather. 17 The hot-mix asphalt binder course shall be cleaned and primed prior to placing the bituminous surface course. 18 The condition of the hot-mix asphalt binder course will be reviewed by the City Engineer (or representative) prior to the placement of the surface course. Any necessary repairs shall be made prior to surface paving. 19 The binder course must experience one winter prior to the installation of the surface course unless otherwise improved. 20 Paving shall be done with equipment in accordance with the Illinois "Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction" (Section 406). 21 Pavement and base course thickness' and slopes shall be in accordance with the project plans and specifications. United City of Yorkville Paving and Road Construction Checklist \\Milkyway\EEI_Storage\Docs\Public\Yorkville\Standard Notes, Forms and Checklists\Checklists\Subdivision Construction\COY Paving Checklist Revised January 2018 United City of Yorkville Sanitary Sewer Checklist Project ___________________________________ Project No. _________________ Contractor ______________________________________ Date: ________________ Item CHECK N/A Sanitary Sewer Construction 1 All Sanitary Sewer shall be constructed in accordance with the "Standard Specificiations for Sanitary Sewer Construction in the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District". 2 All CA-6 Trench Backfill shall be compacted to 95% Standard Proctor in maximum 12" lifts using manual equipment. 3 All Non-Structural Backfill shall be compacted to 85% Standard Proctor. 4 All Type B lids shall have "City of Yorkville" and "Sanitary" cast into the top, and shall be concealed pickhole type. 5 Chimney seals to be installed on all sanitary manholes epr City of Yorkville specifications. 6 Services to be marked with 4x4 Post - Painted Green Sanitary Sewer Testing 7 All sanitary sewer will be subject to an air exfiltration test, televising test, and deflection test according to the Standard specification for Water and Sewer Main Construction in Illinois. 8 Vacuum testing of each Manhole shall be carried out according to the "Standard Specificiations for Sanitary Sewer Construction in the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District". 9 No manholes will be allowed in pavement, sidewalk or driveways unless shown on approved engineering plans 10 The inside of all manholes shall be mortared at the joints and around the pipes. \\Milkyway\EEI_Storage\Docs\Public\Yorkville\Standard Notes, Forms and Checklists\Checklists\Subdivision Construction\COY Sanitary Sewer Checklist Revised March 2009 Project ___________________________________ Project No. _________________ Contractor ______________________________________ Date: ________________ ITEM CHECK N/A SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION 1 Provide a minimum of 4" CA-6 Subbase Granular Material in accordance with Sections 202 and 311. 2 The sidewalk shall be 5' wide and shall extend through driveways. 3 The sidewalk shall be a minimum of 5" in thickness and at all driveway locations shall be a minimum of 6" thick. 4 The sidewalk shall be constructed 1' from the right-of-way boundary on public property unless directed by the City Engineer. 5 The concrete shall be Class SI concrete. 6 Membrane curing compound shall be IDOT Type 1 Clear Transparent Membrane Curing Compound (Section 1020.13) 7 The surface finish shall be a light broom finish. 8 No structures or B-Boxes will be allowed in sidewalks or driveways. 9 The sidewalk shall be constructed with tooled contraction joints at no more than 6' and no less than 4' intervals and be 1" in depth. 10 Bituminous type expansion joint filler, 1/2" thick and with height equal to the sidewalk thickness shall be provided at all lot lines, cold joints and/or minimum 100' intervals. 11 Concrete tickets shall be provided to the City or City Engineer 12 Handicapped Ramps shall be provided at all intersections according to the IDOT Standard Detail and ADA specifications, with the exception that the detectable warning shall be a composite insert per Village Detail. (Section 424) 13 Cold weather procedures will be enforced in inclement weather. 14 No additional water may be applied to the surface of the concrete for finishing purposes. 15 Contractor/Owner responsible to replace any sidewalk damaged by graffiti. 16 Concrete to be cured and protected for 72 hours prior to use by public. RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION 17 Six (6") inch PCC over six (6) inches of compacted CA-6 limestone or crushed gravel 18 Two (2) inch HMA survace course over eight (8") inches of compacted CA-6 limestone or crushed gravel. COMMERICAL DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION 19 Eight (8") inch PCC over six (6) inches of compacted CA-6 limestone or crushed gravel 20 Three (3) inch HMA over eight (10") inches of compacted CA-6 limestone or crushed gravel. TESTING (≥ 50 CU YD or at Engineer's discrection) 21 Air Content shall be between 5% and 8% 22 Slump shall be 2"-4" 23 Minimum strength of 3500 psi 24 Cast a minimum of 4 test cylinders for every 50 yards of concrete United City of Yorkville Sidewalk and Driveway Apron Checklist \\Milkyway\EEI_Storage\Docs\Public\Yorkville\Standard Notes, Forms and Checklists\Checklists\Subdivision Construction\COY Sidewalk and Driveway Apron Checklist Revised January 2018 United City of Yorkville Storm Sewer Checklist Project ___________________________________ Project No. _________________ Contractor ______________________________________ Date: ________________ Item CHECK N/A Storm Sewer Construction 1 All Storm Sewer within the public right-of-way and easements parallel to and adjacent to public right-of-way shall be reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). 2 Storm Sewers in rear yards and side yards may be high-density polyethylene (HDPE) of a manufacturer and design, to be approved by the City of Yorkville. 3 Jogs in Storm Sewer line will not be permitted 4 Catch Basins shall have a 24" minimum sump unless otherwise marked on the plans 5 Storm Sewer Manholes shall be precast reinforced concrete ASTM C-478. 6 All manhole castings, adjusting rings and manhole sections shall be set in butyl rope joint sealant. 7 All final adjustments of castings will be accomplished by the use of precast adjusting rings set in butyl rope joint sealant. 8 Total adjusting rings shall be eight (8") inches in height and no more than two (2). 9 Curb Inlet frames shall be Neenah No. R-32868V, East Jordan No. EV-7520, or approved equal. 10 All manhole castings shall be Neenah No. R-1030, East Jordan No. 105123, and Type B cover, or approved equal. 11 All Type B lids shall have "City of Yorkville" and Storm" cast into the top, and shall be concealed pickhole type. 12 Initial backfill, bedding and haunching material shall be class 1, grade CA 7. 13 All CA-6 Trench Backfill shall be compacted to 95% Standard Proctor in maximum 12" lifts using manual equipment. 14 Storm sewer to be televised and videos submitted to the City prior to acceptance. 15 All Non-Structural Backfill shall be compacted to 85% Standard Proctor. 16 Construct fillets, benches, and inverts according to plan specifications. \\Milkyway\EEI_Storage\Docs\Public\Yorkville\Standard Notes, Forms and Checklists\Checklists\Subdivision Construction\COY Storm Sewer Checklist Revised January 2018 United City of Yorkville Street Lighting Checklist Project ___________________________________ Project No. _________________ Contractor ______________________________________ Date: ________________ Item CHECK N/A Street Lighting 1 The Contractor/Owner shall be held responsible for coordinating all phases of work and correcting any deficiencies to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2 Each light shall be controlled by a photoelectric control integral to the fixture. 3 All driveways, street and sidewalk crossovers shall have 2" HD PVC conduit used as raceways for underground cable. 4 All underground cable shall be installed not less than 2' from the back of the curb and shall be buried at least 30" below the normal finished grade. 5 All cable on the underground section shall be continuous, and no splicing shall be made underground. All necessary splices shall be made above ground level. 6 For grounding, a copper-clad ground rod shall be placed at each pole. The rod shall be minimum 5/8-inch diameter, and ten (10') feet long. 7 For fusing, all underground feeders shall be fused at or below their rated capacity. Each standard shall contain in- line fuse holders, with proper fusing in series with each underground conductor to protect the luminaire located on that pole. 8 Poles shall be placed as shown on the approved engineering plans. Local Streets Streetlight 9 Poles shall be 906 B19-AD4, American Concrete Company pole and bracket, or approved equal. 10 Luminaires shall be mounted 19'9" above the street, shall have a four (4') foot arm. 11 Luminaires shall be fitted with General Electric Company "Lucalox" high-pressure sodium lamps LU 150/55/D, or approved equal, with GE Company ANSI specifications "S55" high-pressure sodium ballasts (or approved equal) or American Electric 115 15-S-RN-120-R2-DA-4B. Major Collector Streets Streetlight 12 Poles shall be Stress Crete E340-BPO-G, with Style 210 low rise tapered aluminum davit, or approved equals. 13 The Davit outreach length shall be eight (8') feet. 14 Luminaire shall be mounted thirty (30') feet above the street. 15 Poles shall have an embedment depth of five (5') feet, and be backfilled with CA-6 limestone. \\Milkyway\EEI_Storage\Docs\Public\Yorkville\Standard Notes, Forms and Checklists\Checklists\Subdivision Construction\COY Street Lights Revised January 2018 United City of Yorkville Water Main Checklist Project ___________________________________ Project No. _________________ Contractor ______________________________________ Date: ________________ Item CHECK N/A Water Main Construction 1 All Water Main shall follow the United City of Yorkville's Water Main Construction notes. 2 All CA-6 Trench Backfill shall be compacted to 95% Standard Proctor in maximum 12" lifts using manual equipment. 3 All Non-Structural Backfill shall be compacted to 85% Standard Proctor. 4 Valve Vault Frame - Neenah R-1713 or Equal 5 Valve Vault Lid - Type B Marked "Water" and "City of Yorkville" 6 Fire Hydrant location and Valve Vault rim grades are to be installed per approved engineering plans. Water Service 8 Services to be marked with 4x4 Post - Painted Blue 9 Water Service B-Box Location shall be staked for location and grade prior to construction. 10 Water services up to 3" diameter shall be Type "K" Copper conforming to the latest revised specification requirement of ASTM B88. Minimum size for residential units shall be 1" diameter. 11 All corporation stops shall be McDonalds No. 4701, Meuller H-1500, or Ford F-600. 12 All curb stops shall be McDonald No. 6104, Meuller H-15154, or Ford B22-333M. 13 All curb boxes shall be Mueller Minneapolis Pattern B-Boxes similar to McDonald N.5614, or Meuller H-10300. 14 No B-Boxes to be installed within sidewalks or driveways. Water Main Testing 15 Pressure Test shall be 150 psi for a two hour duration . 2 psi max loss, leakage based on first 1000 feet. 16 Flushing - United City of Yorkville is to be Notified 17 Disinfection - EEI is to be Notified 18 Sampling - EEI is to be notified \\Milkyway\EEI_Storage\Docs\Public\Yorkville\Standard Notes, Forms and Checklists\Checklists\Subdivision Construction\COY Watermain Checklist Revised January 2018 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTPACKET United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us INTENT AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this commercial development packet is to inform those seeking to develop a commercial property within the United City of Yorkville. It includes samples of items which will be required for development, permit applications which will need to be completed, and a worksheet to estimate possible fees associated with commercial development. A pre-development informational meeting with City Sta will be required before permits will be issued. Please ll out the forms in this packet and contact the Community Development Department (630-553-4350) to arrange the pre-development meeting. CONTENTS: • BUILDING PERMIT FEE ESTIMATE • LETTER OF CREDIT SAMPLES • PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE • STORMWATER PERMIT APPLICATION • SUBDIVISION MAINTENANCE BOND SAMPLE • SURETY BOND SAMPLE • YORKVILLE BRISTOL SANITARY DISTRICT FORM SAMPLES COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT FEE ESTIMATE United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us BUILDING PERMIT FEE TITLE 8 CHAPTER 101A New Development $750.00 + $0.20 per square foot TOTAL: $ Alteration $350.00 + $0.10 per square foot Addition $500.00 + $0.20 per square foot PLAN REVIEW FEE TITLE 8 CHAPTER 101A Plan review fee is based on the size of the building in cubic feet. TOTAL: $ NEW/ADDITION ALTERATION Up to 60,000 cu. ft. $355.00 $177.50 60,001 to 80,000 cu. ft. $400.00 $200.00 80,001 to 100,000 cu. ft. $475.00 $237.50 100,001 to 150,000 cu. ft. $550.00 $275.00 150,001 to 200,000 cu. ft. $650.00 $325.00 Over 200,000 cu. ft. $650.00 + $6.50 per 10,000 cu. ft. over $325.00 + $3.25 per 10,000 cu. ft. over ENGINEERING FEE ORDINANCE 200227 Consultant based fees billed at an hourly rate. Deposit required at the time of application for Site Plan approval are due according to the following schedule: TOTAL: $ Up to one (1) acre $1,000.00 Over one (1) acre, but not over ten (10) acres $2,500.00 Over ten (10) acres, but not over forty (40) acres $5,000.00 Over forty (40) acres, but not over one hundred (100) acres $10,000.00 In excess of one hundred (100.00) acres $20,000.00 Typical total engineering fees equals 1.75% of total construction cost. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST: ____________________ x 1.75% = ____________________ FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS TITLE 8 CHAPTER 101A $115.00 per 10,000 sq. ft. of oor area, or any consultant fees TOTAL: $ FIRE SPRINKLERS TITLE 8 CHAPTER 101A Assumes one (1) head per 225 sq. ft. TOTAL: $ Up to 200 sprinkler heads $250.00 201 to 300 sprinkler heads $300.00 301 to 500 sprinkler heads $400.00 Over 500 sprinkler heads $450.00 + $0.60 per sprinkler head over 500, or any consultant fees PLUMBING INSPECTIONS TITLE 8 CHAPTER 101D $45.00 each or any consultant fees (Assume 3 inspections: underground; rough; and nal)TOTAL: $ SEWER CONNECTION TITLE 8 CHAPTER 101I All nonresidential properties shall be charged a fee based on the total number of drain units times $400.00 based on use of building. This fee is in addition to all other fees charged by any other entity including sanitary districts.TOTAL: $ 1 OF 3 COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT FEE ESTIMATE United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us WATER CONNECTION TITLE 7 CHAPTER 53A WATER METER SIZE WATER CONNECTION FEE TOTAL: $ < 1 inch $3,700.00 1.5 inch $4,000.00 2 inch $5,000.00 3 inch $8,000.00 4 inch $15,000.00 6+ inch TBD WATER CONNECTION TITLE 8 CHAPTER 101I 1st Re-Inspection $50.00 TOTAL: $ 2nd Re-Inspection $75.00 3 0r more Re-Inspection $100.00 each Engineering Re-Inspection $100.00 each TOTAL BUILDING PERMIT FEE ESTIMATE TITLE 8 CHAPTER 101I To calculate the building permit fee estimate, please add the amounts in all of the blue boxes.TOTAL: $ PLEASE NOTE • Bristol Kendall Fire Department (BKFD) and Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District (YBSD) are outside agencies which conduct separate plan reviews and generate separate fees to be paid by the permittee. • Building plan reviews are typically completed within 1-2 weeks from date of complete submittal. • Site Plan Reviews are conducted by the Engineering Department and are typically completed within 1-2 weeks from date of complete submittal. • Building Plans and Site Plans are reviewed concurrently. Should outsourcing of plan reviews be needed (e.g. alternative energy components), the coordination of such review will be done by the City. • Building permit inspections can be scheduled with a minimum of 24 – 48 hour notice by calling 630-553-8545. For larger scale projects, a standing inspection schedule can be established with regular inspections occurring as frequently as daily, weekly or bi-weekly. • All new developments, including expansion projects, are subject to the recently adopted Stormwater Ordinance (attached). Should a project require a new or expanded stormwater basin, it may require the establishment of a back-up Special Service Area (SSA) for future basin maintenance. This process will require a separate public hearing and approval before the City Council. • A pre-construction meeting is required after issuance of a building permit, but prior to construction commencing. Call 630-553-8545 to schedule upon building permit receipt. 2 OF 3 (Letterhead of a Bank, Savings and Loan or Mortgage House) , 20__ Mayor and Aldermen United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Development Name or Address Letter of Credit No. For Account of Amount Date Dear Mayor and Aldermen: The undersigned by , its' duly (name of financial institution) (name & title) authorized agent, hereby establishes and issues this Irrevocable Letter of Credit in favor of the United City of Yorkville in the amount of $ , which represents 120% of the cost of the work described herein. Such credit is available to be drawn upon by said City upon presentation to this bank of your demand for payment. This Letter of Credit is issued for the purpose of guaranteeing the public improvements and erosion and sediment control, and/or stabilization of disturbed areas in the aforesaid development: Total engineer's estimate = ____________________ The costs of the foregoing work are detailed in the attached Engineer's Cost Estimate. The development is legally described as follows: See Attached Exhibit "A" Said work shall be constructed by our customer in accordance with the plans, specifications, completion schedules and cost estimates prepared by . The undersigned agrees that this Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall remain in full force and effect and pertain to any and all amendments or modifications which may be made from time to time to the plans, specifications and cost estimated for said work. This Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall expire on , 20 provided, however, that the undersigned shall notify the City Clerk by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, at least ninety (90) days prior to said expiration date, that said Letter of Credit is about to expire. In no event shall this Irrevocable Letter of Credit or the obligations contained herein expire except upon said prior written notice, it being expressly agreed by the undersigned that the above expiration date shall be extended as required to comply with this notice provision. This Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall remain in effect until , 20 , without regard to any default in payment of money owed to the issuer by our customer and without regard to other claims which the Issuer may have against our customer, and in no event shall terminate without notice as specified above. This Letter of Credit may be renewed by the Issuer or our customer prior to the above expiration date by submitting a new Letter of Credit to the same form and substance as this Letter of Credit to the City Clerk in an amount equal to 120% of the estimated cost to complete and pay for the above described improvements. It is agreed that the following shall be considered a default by our customer and shall entitle the City to make demand on this Letter of Credit: 1. that said Letter of Credit will expire within thirty (30) days and has not been renewed; or 2. that the aforesaid improvements have not been completed by the owner at least thirty (30) days prior to the aforesaid expiration date; or 3. that the owner has failed to complete or carry on the work of the installation and construction of the required improvements in accordance with the schedule, or at a faster pace if the installation of the private improvements shall be completed before public improvements to service them are available; or 4. that the United City of Yorkville has determined that the owner has demonstrated that they will be unable to complete the improvement; or 5. that if more funds are disbursed at this time on order of the owner insufficient funds will remain irrevocably committed to guarantee the completion of all improvements, and such certification indicates that the owner has been notified that the municipality finds that a breach of the owner's obligations has occurred and has not been cured within a period of thirty (30) days. The Issuer's obligation to the City is based solely on this Irrevocable Letter of Credit engagement between this financial institution and the City and is not subject to instructions from our customer. It is recognized that the City will issue a Permit to our customer to proceed with construction upon the guarantee of this irrevocable commitment. It is further acknowledged that the consideration for this irrevocable commitment is provided by agreements between this financial institution and our customer. This Irrevocable Letter of Credit sets forth in full the terms of this undertaking between the Issuer and the City, and such undertaking shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, nor shall it be limited by reference to any documents, instrument or agreement referred to herein, and any such reference shall not be deemed to incorporate herein by reference any document, instrument or agreement. Demands on this Letter of Credit shall be made by presenting the Issuer with a letter from the City Clerk of the United City of Yorkville demanding payment accompanied by the certificate of the City Clerk of the United City of Yorkville certifying the basis for the default and demand on this Letter of Credit. The undersigned agrees that this Letter of Credit shall not be reduced or discharged except upon receipt of a certificate of the City Clerk of the United City of Yorkville certifying that this Letter of Credit may be reduced. Reductions to the Letter of Credit amount shall be in compliance with city resolution and/or policy in effect at the time of reduction. All acts, requirements and other preconditions for the issuance of this Irrevocable Letter of Credit have been completed. The undersigned further agrees and engages that it will be responsible and liable for attorney fees and court costs which may be incurred by the City in enforcing collection of this Letter of Credit in accordance with its' terms. We hereby engage with you that all demands for payment in conformity with the terms of this Irrevocable Letter of Credit will be duly honored on presentation to us prior to expiration of this Letter of Credit. Except as otherwise expressly stated herein, this Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, 2007 Revision, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. BY: ATTEST: Name: Name: Title: Title: STATE OF ILLINOIS) ) SS COUNTY OF ) I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that , personally known to me to be the of the (title) , and personally known to me to be the (name of institution) (title) of said institution, and who are personally known to me to be the same persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing Letter of Credit as such and (title) (title) respectively, and caused the corporate seal of said to be affixed thereto (name of institution) pursuant to authority given by the Board of Directors thereof as their free and voluntary acts and as the free and voluntary act and deed of said institution. Given under my hand and official seal this day of 20 . SEAL Notary Public (Letterhead of a Bank, Savings and Loan or Mortgage House) , 20__ Mayor and Aldermen City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Development Name or Address Letter of Credit No. For Account of Amount Date Gentlemen: The undersigned by , its' duly (name of financial institution) (name & title) authorized agent, hereby establishes and issues this Irrevocable Letter of Credit in favor of the City of Yorkville in the amount of $ , which represents 120% of the cost of the work described herein. Such credit is available to be drawn upon by said City upon presentation to this bank of your demand for payment. This Letter of Credit is issued for the purpose of securing and paying for the installation of the following land improvements in the aforesaid development: DIVISION "A" – SANITARY SEWERS (engineer's estimate = ) DIVISION "B" – WATER MAIN (engineer's estimate = ) DIVISION "C" – STORM SEWERS (engineer's estimate = ) DIVISION “D” – STREETS (engineer's estimate = ) DIVISION “E” - DETENTION BASIN (engineer's estimate = ) DIVISION “F” - MISC. IMPROVEMENTS (engineer's estimate = ) Total engineer's estimate = The costs of the foregoing improvements are detailed in the attached Engineer's Cost Estimate. The development is legally described as follows: See Attached Exhibit "A" Said work shall be constructed by , our customer, in accordance with the plans, specifications, completion schedules and cost estimates prepared by . (subdivider’s engineer) The undersigned agrees that this Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall remain in full force and effect and pertain to any and all amendments or modifications which may be made from time to time to the plans, specifications and cost estimated for said work. This Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall expire on , 20 provided, however, that the undersigned shall notify the City Clerk by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, at least ninety (90) days prior to said expiration date, that said Letter of Credit is about to expire. In no event shall this Irrevocable Letter of Credit or the obligations contained herein expire except upon said prior written notice, it being expressly agreed by the undersigned that the above expiration date shall be extended as required to comply with this notice provision. This Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall remain in effect until , 20 , without regard to (expiration date) any default in payment of money owed to the issuer by our customer and without regard to other claims which the Issuer may have against our customer, and in no event shall terminate without notice as specified above. This Letter of Credit may be renewed by the Issuer or our customer prior to the above expiration date by submitting a new Letter of Credit to the same form and substance as this Letter of Credit to the City Clerk in an amount equal to 120% of the estimated cost to complete and pay for the above described improvements. It is agreed that the following shall be considered a default by our customer and shall entitle the City to make demand on this Letter of Credit: 1. that said Letter of Credit will expire within thirty (30) days and has not been renewed; or 2. that the aforesaid improvements has not been completed by the subdivider at least thirty (30) days prior to the aforesaid expiration date; or 3. that the owner and/or subdivider has failed to complete or carry on the work of the installation and construction of the required improvements in accordance with the schedule, or at a faster pace if installation of the private improvements shall be completed before public improvements to service them are available; or 4. that the City of Yorkville has determined that the owner and/or subdivider has demonstrated that they will be unable to complete the improvements; or 5. that if more funds are disbursed at this time on order of the owner and/or subdivider insufficient funds will remain irrevocably committed to guarantee the completion of all improvements, and such certification indicates that the owner and/or subdivider has been notified that the municipality finds that a breach of the owner’s and/or subdivider’s obligations has occurred and has not been cured within a period of thirty (30) days. The Issuer's obligation to the City is based solely on this Irrevocable Letter of Credit engagement between this financial institution and the City and is not subject to instructions from our customer. It is recognized that the City has directed our customer to proceed with construction of public improvements upon the guarantee of this irrevocable commitment. It is further acknowledged that the consideration for this irrevocable commitment is provided by agreements between this financial institution and our customer. This Irrevocable Letter of Credit sets forth in full the terms of this undertaking between the Issuer and the City, and such undertaking shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, nor shall it be limited by reference to any documents, instrument or agreement referred to herein, and any such reference shall not be deemed to incorporate herein by reference any document, instrument or agreement. Demands on this Letter of Credit shall be made by presenting the Issuer with a letter from the City Clerk of the City of Yorkville demanding payment accompanied by the certificate of the City Clerk of the City of Yorkville certifying the basis for the default and demand on this Letter of Credit. The undersigned agrees that this Letter of Credit shall not be reduced or discharged except upon receipt of a certificate of the City Clerk of the City of Yorkville certifying that this Letter of Credit may be reduced. The outstanding balance of this Letter of Credit shall be the face amount of this Letter of Credit less any amount which is discharged upon certificate of the City clerk; Provided however, the outstanding balance of this Letter of Credit shall not be reduced to less than 20% of the approved engineer’s estimate upon which this Letter of Credit is based until the City Council accepts the aforementioned improvements and a certificate of the City Clerk certifying that the Letter of Credit has been released by the City Council of Yorkville. All acts, requirements and other preconditions for the issuance of this Irrevocable Letter of Credit have been completed. The undersigned further agrees and engages that it will be responsible and liable for attorney fees and court costs which may be incurred by the City in enforcing collection of this Letter of Credit in accordance with its' terms. We hereby engage with you that all demands for payment in conformity with the terms of this Irrevocable Letter of Credit will be duly honored on presentation to us prior to expiration of this Letter of Credit. Except as otherwise expressly stated herein, this Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, 2007 Revision, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. BY: ATTEST: Name: Name: Title: Title: STATE OF ILLINOIS) ) SS COUNTY OF ) I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that , personally known to me to be the of the (title) , and personally known to me to be the (name of institution) (title) of said institution, and who are personally known to me to be the same persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing Letter of Credit as such and (title) (title) respectively, and caused the corporate seal of said to be affixed thereto (name of institution) pursuant to authority given by the Board of Directors thereof as their free and voluntary acts and as the free and voluntary act and deed of said institution. Given under my hand and official seal this day of 20 . SEAL Notary Public PERMIT FEE: $100.00 PERMIT NUMBER:DATE: APPLICANT/PETITIONER NAME:COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP:TELEPHONE: EMAIL:FAX: PROPERTY OWNER Please check this box if the property owner is the same as the applicant/petitioner and continue to the next section. NAME:COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP:TELEPHONE: EMAIL:FAX: PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NAME:COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP:TELEPHONE: EMAIL:FAX: LAND SURVEYOR NAME:COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP:TELEPHONE: EMAIL:FAX: 1 OF 4 STORMWATER PERMIT APPLICATIONUnited City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us Please submit completed application to the Engineering Department with required plans, fees and documents. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us PROJECT NUMBER:DATE RECEIVED:DATE APPROVED: The Public Improvement Construction (PIC) schedule is required for any new residential subdivision and/or commercial development within the City of Yorkville. The terms of the PIC schedule identies the public and private improvements required to be constructed, and provides the assurance that the necessary public improvements will be constructed in a manner consistent with the City’s established standards in a timely manner and subject to the applicable warranty periods. If approved by the City, the construction schedule may provide for the installation and acceptance of certain improvements in phases. Any phased development plan ap- proved as part of the PIC schedule must be a self-contained area of the overall development consisting of all public improvements necessary to serve that portion of the property to be developed as part of such phase. Reasonable conditions on the phasing of developments may be imposed by the City in order to protect the community and adjacent properties. Proposed phasing plans shall be submitted with a separate PIC schedule for each phase of construction, and no work shall commence on a subsequent phase without completion and acceptance of the prior phase or approval by the City Engineer. The Public Improvement Construction (PIC) schedule also requires the developer and/or owner to provide nancial security in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit or bond for the proposed improvements. Financial Security shall be provided to the City prior to and as a condition of the issuance of a site development permit. The undersigned Owner agrees to the Public Improvement Construction (PIC) schedule as described below: TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT: LOCATION/SUBDIVISION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION (submit as an attachment) APPROVED CONSTRUCTION TIME PERIOD BEGINNING DATE:ENDING DATE: The Approved Engineer’s Estimate of Cost (EEOC) or Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Costs (EOPC) must be attached to this document. Owner further agrees: • To install all required public improvements as approved per Title 11 Subdivision Control Ordinance of the United City of Yorkville Municipal Code and the Standard Specications for Improvements attached hereto. • To pay all fees and costs associated with the development incurred by the City for plan review and processing, inspection, material testing and other engineering services as prescribed by ordinance or in the municipal code. • To install all streets, sewers, water mains, street lights, and other public improvements in a workmanship like manner within four (4) years of initial construction. All public improvements shall be maintained by the subdivider/developer until they are approved and accepted by the City. • To provide proof by title search that all accepted infrastructure is free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PIC SCHEDULE OWNER/ DEVELOPER NAME: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP:TELEPHONE: EMAIL:FAX: Owner/Developer Signature SITE IMPROVEMENT DETAILS SITE ADDRESS: DEVELOPMENT NAME: PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER PIN: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1/4 SECTION:TOWNSHIP:RANGE: LOTS: UNIT/PHASE: GROSS ACRES:CUT (CUBIC YARDS):NUMBER OF BUILDINGS (IF ANY): AREA TO BE DISTURBED (SQ. FT.):FILL (CUBIC YARDS): TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): Development within a regulatory oodplain or oodplain within property boundary. Any land disturbing activity performed in a water course of water body. Fill that will exceed three (3) feet in vertical height as its highest point measured from the natural ground surface. Any land disturbing activity requiring a site runo storage facility. The development disturbs more than 10,000 square feet of ground cover, unless exempt per Section 500.1.A.e. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: UNDER PENALTY OF INTENTIONAL MISREPRESENTATION AND/OR PERJURY, I declare that I have examined and/or made this application and it is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I agree to construct said improvement(s) in compliance with all provisions of the applicable ordinances. I realize that the information that I have armed hereon forms a basis for the issuance of the stormwater management permit(s) herein applied for and approval of plans in connection therewith shall not be constructed to permit any construction upon said premises or use thereof in violation of any provision of any applicable ordinance or to excuse the owner or his/her successors in title from complying therewith. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE DATE 2 OF 4 STORMWATER PERMIT APPLICATIONUnited City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us Please submit completed application to the Engineering Department with required plans, fees and documents. REQUIRED DOCUMENTS FOR STORMWATER PERMIT ISSUANCE Please review and check that all the following documents, calculations, and agency approvals are submitted with your permit application. DOCUMENTS: refer to article 5 of Stormwater Ordinance for full list of required documents PROJECT OVERVIEW PLAN • A location map or description providing township, range and nearest roadways • Acreage and zoning of property area • Property area lines and dimensions including right-of-ways, easements, and setback lines • Existing and proposed site conditions including buildings, roads, impervious surfaces, and ground elevations where site grading is proposed • Proposed limits and restoration of disturbed areas • Existing and proposed drainage features such as culverts, conduits, swales, streams, ponds, wetlands, etc. • Location and report of on-site subsurface drains and tiles and all o-site drains tiles (upstream and downstream) potentially impacted by the development • Location of wells, septic systems, water mains, and sanitary sewers EROSION CONTROL PLAN refer to Article 3 of the Stormwater Ordinance • Notice of Intent (NOI) for construction activity • Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) ENGINEERING PLAN SET SUBMITTAL • Site Topographic Map • General Plan View Drawing • Vicinity Topographic Map STORMWATER SUBMITTAL • Narrative of the existing and proposed site drainage patterns and conditions • Schedule for implementation of the site stormwater plan • On-site and o-site runo calculations • Site runo storage calculations FLOODPLAIN SUBMITTAL refer to Article 4 of Stormwater Ordinance This is only necessary if development has oodplains on-site or if on-site variance requested. • Regulatory oodplain boundary determination • Floodway hydrologic and hydraulic analyses • Floodplain ll and compensatory storage calculations for below and above 10-year ood elevation up to the base ood elevation • Flood proong measures • Flood Protection Easements, if required MAINTENANCE PLAN, SCHEDULE AND FUNDING (refer to Article 6 of Stormwater Ordinance 3 OF 4 STORMWATER PERMIT APPLICATIONUnited City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us Please submit completed application to the Engineering Department with required plans, fees and documents. CALCULATIONS STORMWATER DATA SUMMARY:WETLAND DATA SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY OWNERSHIP:ACRES EXISTING WETLAND ACREAGE:ACRES HYDROLOGIC DISTURBANCE:ACRES WATERS OF THE US:ACRES WATERSHED TRIBUTARY AREA:ACRES ISOLATED WATERS:ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA:ACRES IMPACTED WETLAND ACREAGE:ACRES EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA:ACRES WATERS OF THE US:ACRES DETENTION VOLUME REQUIRED:ACRES ISOLATED WATERS:ACRES COMPENSATORY STORAGE REQUIRED:ACRES MITIGATION REPLACEMENT RATIO:ACRES DEPRESSIONAL:ACRES MITIGATION REPLACEMENT REQUIRED:ACRES RIVERINE 0 TO 10YEAR:ACRES WATERS OF THE US:ACRES RIVERINE 10 TO 100YEAR:ACRES ISOLATED WATERS:ACRES ON-SITE:ACRES OFF-SITE:ACRES MITIGATION BANK:ACRES APPROVALS FROM OUTSIDE AGENCIES PERMIT TYPE ISSUING AGENCY PERMIT NUMBER APPLICATION FILING DATE PERMIT ISSUE DATE UNDER PENALTY OF INTENTIONAL MISREPRESENTATION AND/OR PERJURY, I declare that I have examined and/or made this application and it is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I agree to construct said improvement(s) in compliance with all provisions of the applicable ordinances. I realize that the information that I have armed hereon forms a basis for the issuance of the stormwater management permit(s) herein applied for and approval of plans in connection therewith shall not be constructed to permit any construction upon said premises or use thereof in violation of any provision of any applicable ordinance or to excuse the owner or his/her successors in title from complying therewith. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE DATE 4 OF 4 STORMWATER PERMIT APPLICATIONUnited City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us Please submit completed application to the Engineering Department with required plans, fees and documents. COMMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT FEE ESTIMATE United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us PETITIONER DEPOSIT ACCOUNT FUND It is the policy of the United City of Yorkville to require any applicant seeking a building permit which requires engineering review establish a Petitioner Deposit Account Fund to cover all actual expenses occurred as a result of plan reviews and administration costs. Typical requests requiring the establishment of a Petitioner Deposit Account Fund include, but are not limited to, new commercial construction, stormwater management related permits and signicant building additions. Deposit account funds may also be used to cover costs for services related to legal fees, engineering and other plan reviews, processing of other governmental applications, recording fees and other outside coordination and consulting fees. Each fund account is established with an initial deposit based upon the estimated cost for services provided above. This initial deposit is drawn against to pay for these services related to the project or request. Periodically throughout the project review/building permit process, the Financially Responsible Party will receive an invoice reecting the charges made against the account. At any time the balance of the fund account fall below ten percent (10%) of the original deposit amount, the Financially Responsible Party will receive an invoice requesting additional funds equal to one-hundred percent (100%) of the initial deposit if subsequent reviews/fees related to the project are required. In the event that a deposit account is not immediately replenished, review by the administrative sta, consultants, boards and commissions may be suspended until the account is fully replenished. If additional funds remain in the deposit account at the completion of the project, the city will refund the balance to the Financially Responsible Party. A written request must be submitted by the Financially Responsible Party to the city by the 15th of the month in order for the refund check to be processed and distributed by the 15th of the following month. All refund checks will be made payable to the Financially Responsible Party and mailed to the address provided when the account was established. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Financially Responsible Party: I acknowledge and understand that as the Financially Responsible Party, expenses may exceed the estimated initial deposit and, when requested by the United City of Yorkville, I will provide additional funds to maintain the required account balance. Further, the sale or other disposition of the property does not relieve the individual or Company/Corporation of their obligation to maintain a positive balance in the fund account, unless the United City of Yorkville approves a Change of Responsible Party and transfer of funds. Should the account go into decit, all City work may stop until the requested replenishment deposit is received. Name (print) Title Signature* Date *The name of the individual and the person who signs this declaration must be the same. If a corporation is listed, a corporate ocer must sign the declaration (President, Vice-President, Chairman, Secretary or Treasurer 3 OF 3 SUBDIVISION MAINTENANCE BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That ______________________________________________________________________ as Principal, hereinafter called Contractor and _______________________________________________________________________ as Surety, hereinafter called Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, 60560, as Obligee, hereinafter called City, in the penal sum of ____________________________________ ($_________), for payment whereof Contractor and Surety bind themselves, and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, by this obligation. WHEREAS, the Contractor has constructed certain public improvements for lots within a subdivision commonly known as ___________________________________________________ and as more particularly described and designated on the plat of said property, said plat being incorporated herein and made a part hereof by reference thereto; and, WHEREAS, the aforementioned public improvements were made pursuant to certain plans and specifications on file with the City and the City’s Subdivision Control Ordinance, both made a part hereof by reference thereto; and, WHEREAS, the Contractor has requested the City accept the public improvements pursuant to Section 11-5-2 of the City’s Subdivision Control Ordinance that requires in Section 11-5-3 the Contractor to post with the City this bond in the amount of ten percent of the improvements to guarantee the maintenance and performance of the improvements to properly function as designed and to remain free of defects in material, workmanship and installation for a period of one year from the date of approval by the City accepting the improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that, if the Principal shall perform the obligations in accordance with the ordinances, standards and requirements of the City and shall fully indemnify and save harmless the City from all cost and damage which the City may suffer by reason of failure on the Principal’s part, not to exceed the penal sum of this bond, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED the City shall notify the Principal in writing of any defect for which the Principal is responsible and shall specify in said notice a period of time in which Principal shall have to correct said defect. The Surety unconditionally covenants and agrees that if the Principal fails to correct said defects, within the time specified, the Surety, upon 30 days certified mail notice to the address above 1 from the City of the defect will correct such defect or defects and pay all City expenditures and obligations thereof, including, but not limited to construction costs and consultant fees. Should the Surety fail or refuse to correct the defects, the City in consideration of the public health, welfare and safety and in approving and accepting said improvements shall have the right to resort to any and all legal remedies against the Principal and Surety, both at law and in equity, including specifically repair or replacement of said improvements to which the Principal and surety unconditionally agree. The City, at its option, shall have the right to correct said defects resulting from faulty materials or workmanship, or, pursuant to bidding cause to be corrected any said defects in case the Principal shall fail or refuse to do so, and in the event the City should exercise and give effect to such right, the Principal and Surety shall be jointly and severally bound hereunder to reimburse the City the total cost thereof, including, but not limited to, engineering, legal and contingent cost, together with any damages which may be sustained on account of the failure of the Principal to correct said defects. The City shall have no obligation to actually incur any cost or correct any deficient performance of the Principal in order to be entitled to receive the proceeds of this bond for any defect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and Surety have executed this bond this ___ day of _____, 201_. Principal ____________________________________ By: _____________________________________ Surety: _____________________________________ By: _____________________________________ Attorney-in-fact Attach standard form showing Attorney-in-fact authorization 2 (Letterhead of Surety) , 20 Mayor and Aldermen City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Subdivision Name Subdivision Bond No. For Account of Amount Date Gentlemen: The undersigned by , its' duly (Name of Surety) (Name & title) authorized agent,, hereby establishes and issues this Subdivision Bond in favor of the City of Yorkville in the amount of $ , which represents 120% of the cost of the improvements described herein. Said amount is available to be drawn upon for the benefit of said City upon presentation to this institution of your demand for performance accompanied by a copy of this Subdivision Bond. This Subdivision Bond is issued for the purpose of guaranteeing the installation of the following land improvements in the aforesaid subdivision: DIVISION "A" - SANITARY SEWERS (engineer's estimate = ) DIVISION "B" - WATER MAIN (engineer's estimate = ) DIVISION "C" - STORM SEWERS (engineer's estimate = ) DIVISION "D" - STREETS (engineer's estimate = ) DIVISION "E" - DETENTION BASIN (engineer's estimate = ) DIVISION "F" - MISC. IMPROVEMENTS (engineer's estimate = ) Total engineer's estimate = The costs of the foregoing improvements are detailed in the attached Engineer's Cost Estimate. The development is legally described as follows: See Attached Exhibit "A" Said public improvements shall be constructed by our customer, in (subdivider) accordance with the plans, specifications, completion schedules and cost estimates prepared by . (sub divider’s engineer) The undersigned agrees that this Subdivision Bond shall remain in full force and effect and pertain to any and all amendments or modifications that may be made from time to time to the plans, specifications and cost estimated for said modifications. This Subdivision Bond shall expire on , 20 . provided, however, the undersigned shall notify the City Clerk by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, at least ninety (90) days prior to said expiration date that said Subdivision Bond is about to expire. In no event shall this Subdivision Bond or the obligations contained herein expire except upon said prior written notice, it being expressly agreed by the undersigned that the above expiration date shall be extended as required to comply with this notice provision. This Subdivision Bond shall remain in effect until , 20 , without regard to (expiration date) any default in payment of money owed to the issuer by our customer and without regard to other claims that the Issuer may have against our customer, and in no event shall terminate without notice as specified above. This Subdivision Bond may be renewed by the Surety or our customer prior to the above expiration date by submitting a new Subdivision Bond to the same form and substance as this Subdivision Bond to the City Clerk in an amount equal to 110% of the estimated cost to complete and pay for the above-described improvements. It is agreed that the following shall be considered a default by our customer and shall entitle the City to make demand on this Subdivision Bond: 1. that said Subdivision Bond will expire within thirty (30) days and has not been renewed; or 2. that the aforesaid improvements have not been completed by the subdivider at least thirty (30) days prior to the aforesaid expiration date; or 3. that the owner and/or subdivider has failed to complete or carry on the work of the installation and construction of the required improvements in accordance with the schedule, or at a faster pace if the installation of the private improvements shall be completed before public improvements to service them are available; or 4. that the City of Yorkville has determined that the owner and/or subdivider has demonstrated that they will be unable to complete the improvement; or 5. that if more funds are disbursed at this time on order of the owner and/or subdivider insufficient funds will remain irrevocably committed to guarantee the completion of all improvements, and such certification indicates that the owner and/or subdivider has been notified that the municipality finds that a breach of the owner's and/or subdivider's obligations has occurred and has not been cured within a period of thirty (30) days. The Surety's obligation to the City is based solely on this Subdivision Bond engagement between this Surety and the City and is not subject to instructions from our customer. It is recognized that the City has directed our customer to proceed with the construction of public improvements upon the guarantee of this irrevocable commitment. It is further acknowledged that the consideration for this irrevocable commitment is provided by agreements between this Surety and our customer. This Subdivision Bond sets forth in full the terms of this undertaking between the Surety and the City, and such undertaking shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, nor shall it be limited by reference to any documents, instrument or agreement referred to herein, and any such reference shall not be deemed to incorporate herein by reference any document, instrument or agreement. Demands on this Subdivision Bond shall be made by presenting the Surety with a letter from the City Clerk of the City of Yorkville demanding performance accompanied by the certificate of the City Clerk of the City of Yorkville certifying the basis for the default and demand on this Subdivision Bond. The undersigned agrees that this Subdivision Bond shall not be reduced or discharged except upon receipt of a certificate of the City Clerk of the City of Yorkville certifying that this Subdivision Bond may be reduced. The outstanding balance of this Subdivision Bond shall be the face amount of this Subdivision Bond less any amount which is discharged upon certificate of the City Clerk; Provided however, the outstanding balance of this Subdivision Bond shall not be reduced to less than 20% of the approved engineer's estimate upon which this Subdivision Bond is based until the City Council accepts the aforementioned improvements and a certificate of the City Clerk certifying that the Subdivision Bond has been released by the City Council of the City. All acts, requirements and other preconditions for the issuance of this Irrevocable Subdivision Bond have been completed. The undersigned further agrees and engages that it will be responsible and liable for attorney fees and court costs which may be incurred by the City in enforcing performance of this Subdivision Bond in accordance with its terms. We hereby engage with you that all demands for payment in conformity with the terms of this Subdivision Bond will be duly honored on presentation to us prior to expiration of this Subdivision Bond. BY: ATTEST: Name: Name: Title: Title: STATE OF ILLINOIS) COUNTY OF ) ) SS I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that , personally known to me to be the of the (title) , and personally known to me to be the (name of Surety) (title) of said Surety, and who are personally known to me to be the same persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing Subdivision Bond as such and (title) (title) respectively, and caused the corporate seal of said to be affixed thereto (name of Surety) pursuant to authority given by the Board of Directors thereof as their free and voluntary acts and as the free and voluntary act and deed of said Surety. Given under my hand and official seal this day of , 20 . SEAL Notary Public SAM P L E S AM P L E