Loading...
Planning and Zoning Commission Packet 2018 03-14-18 revised PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA Wednesday, March 14, 2018 7:00 PM Yorkville City Hall Council Chambers 800 Game Farm Road REVISED: 3/9/18 Meeting Called to Order: 7:00 p.m. Roll Call: Previous Meeting Minutes: December 13, 2017 Citizen’s Comments -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Hearings Old Business New Business 1. PZC 2018-01 Keith and Kathleen Warpinski have filed an application with Kendall County requesting a rezone from A-1 Agricultural District to R-1 Residential District on 6.9 acres to build a single-family home in the future. The real property is located at the north side of Walker Road, approximately 0.31 miles east of IL Route 47 in unincorporated Kendall County. Action Item 1 ½ Mile Review (Rezone) 2. PZC 2018-05 LaSalle National Trust #47016 is seeking a variance from the Kendall County Zoning Ordinance to allow for a temporary concrete crusher and temporary batch plant a minimum of 318 feet from the nearest occupied structure. The real property is located on the north side of US Route 34, east of Diehl Farm Road in unincorporated Kendall County. Action Item 1 ½ Mile Review (Variance) Additional Business 1. Commissioner Training – Christina L. Emmert, a professional registered parliamentarian will conduct a training seminar for Planning and Zoning Commissioners to review committee meeting rules, review the Illinois open meetings practice act, and provide education regarding basics of making motions and dealing with difficult attendees at public meetings. United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 www.yorkville.il.us 2. Downtown Overlay District Streetscape Master Plan and Form Based Code a. Update on the progress of the project. 3. Potential Additional Commissioner Training with Pete Pointner, FAICP. Adjournment PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA Wednesday, March 14, 2018 7:00 PM Yorkville City Hall Council Chambers 800 Game Farm Road Meeting Called to Order: 7:00 p.m. Roll Call: Previous Meeting Minutes: December 13, 2017 Citizen’s Comments -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Hearings Old Business New Business 1. PZC 2018-01 Keith and Kathleen Warpinski have filed an application with Kendall County requesting a rezone from A-1 Agricultural District to R-1 Residential District on 6.9 acres to build a single-family home in the future. The real property is located at the north side of Walker Road, approximately 0.31 miles east of IL Route 47 in unincorporated Kendall County. Action Item 1 ½ Mile Review (Rezone) Additional Business 1. Commissioner Training – Christina L. Emmert, a professional registered parliamentarian will conduct a training seminar for Planning and Zoning Commissioners to review committee meeting rules, review the Illinois open meetings practice act, and provide education regarding basics of making motions and dealing with difficult attendees at public meetings. 2. Downtown Overlay District Streetscape Master Plan and Form Based Code a. Update on the progress of the project. 3. Potential Additional Commissioner Training with Pete Pointner, FAICP. Adjournment United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 www.yorkville.il.us Page 1 of 3 DRAFT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION City Council Chambers 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Il Wednesday, December 13, 2017 7:00pm Meeting Called to Order Chairman Randy Harker called the meeting to order at 7:00pm, roll was called and a quorum was established. Roll Call: Bill Gockman-yes, Reagan Goins-yes, Deborah Horaz-yes, Don Marcum-yes, Jeff Olson- yes, Randy Harker-yes Absent: Richard Vinyard City Staff Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Lynn Dubajic, City Consultant Other Guests Dave Schultz, HR Green Rob Getz, VP Centex Previous Meeting Minutes October 18, 2017 and November 8, 2017 Mr. Marcum moved and Mr. Gockman seconded a motion to approve both sets of minutes. Roll call: Goins-yes, Horaz-yes, Marcum-yes, Olson-yes, Gockman-yes, Harker-yes Motion carried 6-0 Citizen’s Comments None Public Hearings None Old Business None New Business 1. PZC 2017-14 Centex Real Estate Company, LLC, petitioner has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting final plat amendment approval for the resubdivision of Bristol Bay Units 9 and 11. The real property is located within the northeast quadrant of Illinois Route 47 (Bridge) and Galena Road in Yorkville. Mr. Getz said Centex is requesting replatting of units 9 and 11 which were originally platted for condos until the recession occurred. Going forward, the condo market seems to be poor. They wish to close out the built portions and turn over to the HOA. The rest Page 2 of 3 of the properties may be rezoned. They have been performing punchlist items and the engineer has approved the completed work. Commissioner Marcum questioned the “squares not included” on the map. Mr. Getz gave an explanation and said the lots could be built out at a later time. Mr. Getz also said the common area will be turned over to the HOA in areas already built. Action Item Final Plat Amendment A motion was made by Mr. Olson and seconded by Ms. Horaz as follows: In consideration of the proposed Final Plat of Resubdivision of Bristol Bay Lot 2048 – Unit 9 and Lot 2049 – Unit 11, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the plat to the City Council as presented by the Petitioner in a plan prepared by HR Green, dated last revised December 6, 2017. Roll call: Horaz-yes, Marcum-yes, Olson-yes, Gockman-yes, Goins-yes, Harker-yes Motion carried 6-0 2. PZC 2017-15 David Schultz, Engineer, as petitioner, on behalf of Cedarhurst of Yorkville Real Estate, LLC, owner, has filed an application with the City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting final plat amendment approval for the Cedarhurst of Yorkville P.U.D. Subdivision. The real property is located at the northeast corner of US 34 (Veterans Parkway) and Cannonball Trail in Yorkville. Mr. Schultz said he is seeking approval for the final plat amendment and dedication of right-of-way. Water plans have been approved by the engineer. Action Item Final Plat Amendment Mr. Marcum moved and Mr. Gockman seconded the following motion: In consideration of the proposed Final Plat of Cedarhurst of Yorkville PUD Subdivision, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the plat to the City Council as presented by the Petitioner in a plan prepared by HR Green, dated last revised May 23, 2017. Roll call: Marcum-yes, Olson-yes, Gockman-yes, Goins-yes, Horaz-yes, Harker-yes Carried: 6-0 Additional Business City Council Action Updates a. PZC 2017-13 Dave and Debbie Coffman requesting rezoning: City Council approved on December 12, 2017. b. Downtown Overlay District Streetscape Master Plan and Form Based Code – Contract Award City went out for RFP for a scope of downtown streetscape and contract awarded to Farr and Associates. Meetings will be scheduled and this will come back to PZC. This will be a 6-month process. Page 3 of 3 c. Downtown Wayfinding Signage – Bid Award Update The bid was awarded to Michael's Signs for directional signs and two kiosks to be done in 2018 and 2019. d. Downtown Landscape Hill Project - Update An ITEP grant application has been submitted to assist with this project. Ms. Dubajic also presented updates: 1. YPAC (2nd facility) will move into the old Record Building 2. Deli and candy store will move into the previous St. Joe's bulding and will employ some special needs kids 3. “1836” opened 4. Banquet hall will open in the unfinished building at Stagecoach Crossing Adjournment There was no further business and the meeting was adjourned 7:18pm on a voice vote. Respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker Proposal Summary Staff has reviewed a request from Kendall County Planning and Zoning Department along with the subsequent documents attached. This property is located within one and a half miles of the planning boundary for Yorkville, allowing us the opportunity to review and provide comments to Kendall County. The petitioners, Keith and Kathleen Warpinski, are requesting a map amendment rezone for their property from A-1 Agricultural District to R-1 Residential District. Petitioners would like to construct a single family home in the future and may not do so due to the zoning requirements of the agricultural district in Kendall County. The 6.9 acre property is located at the north side of Walker Road approximately 0.31 miles east of Route 47. As stated in the petitioner’s findings of fact, they believe the use is compatible with other nearby uses in the area as the adjacent properties have single family homes constructed upon them. The petitioners state that the subject property is not suitable by site acreage nor site usage for current modern row crop farming practices. The petitioners believe the construction of a single family home would be consistent with the adjacent rural residential uses. Yorkville Comprehensive Plan Yorkville’s current 2016 Comprehensive Plan designation for this property is agricultural which is intended to allow for farming and open space uses. The plan states that environmentally sensitive areas such as tree groves, wetlands, and poorly drained areas will be protected from development during the Comprehensive Plan’s time horizon. The petitioner has attached a Natural Resource Information Executive Summary to their application which includes a Kendall County Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA). The LESA determines the suitability of a land use change or zoning request as it relates to agricultural land. The results of the assessment concluded that the property is considered to need a low level of protection. This means that the change in land use will have a small effect on surrounding agricultural uses. Memorandum To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Jason Engberg, Senior Planner CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Date: February 26, 2018 Subject: PZC 2018-01 – Kendall County Case #18-05 (Rezone) 1.5 Mile Review Integrated Transportation Plan Yorkville’s Integrated Transportation Plan (ITP) designates a trail along the Aux Sable Creek and one along the north side of Walker Road. In the future if the construction of these trails becomes a reality, the City would like to make it aware at this moment to the interested parties that there are future plans for these trails though the property and right-of-way designations may be requested in the future. Staff Recommendation & Comments Staff has reviewed the request for rezone and does not have an objection to the petitioner’s request. After reviewing the Comprehensive Plan, the land use will be compatible with future land uses at this location according to the plan. Additionally, the property is not currently adjacent to the Yorkville Municipal Boundary and therefore annexation of this property in the near future is very unlikely. If the property is annexed into the City at some point in the future, it would most likely be for a larger development and this land use would be replaced. Staff will be available to answer any questions the Planning and Zoning Commission may have regarding the County Petition. This item was delivered to the City on February 22, 2018 with feedback requested prior to Kendall County Board consideration. Attachments 1. Application with Attachments ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier –February 20, 2018 Page 1 of 3 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, BUILDING & ZONING 111 West Fox Street  Room 203 Yorkville, IL  60560 (630) 553-4141 Fax (630) 553-4179 Petition 18-05 Keith and Kathleen Warpinski Map Amendment Rezoning Property from A-1 to R-1 INTRODUCTION Keith and Kathleen Warpinski are requesting a map amendment rezoning the subject property from A-1 to R- 1 in order to have the ability to construct a single-family home on the property. SITE INFORMATION PETITIONER: Keith and Kathleen Warpinski ADDRESS: Between 9239 and 9125 Walker Road LOCATION: 0.31 Miles East of Route 47 on the North Side of Walker Road ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier –February 20, 2018 Page 2 of 3 TOWNSHIP: Kendall PARCEL #: 05-21-400-011 LOT SIZE: 6.57 acres EXITING LAND USE: Residential/Agricultural ZONING: A-1 Agricultural District LRMP: Land Use Agricultural Roads Walker Road is a County Road classified as a Minor Collector Road Trails Trails are planned along Walker Road and along the Middle Aux Sable Creek Floodplain/ Wetlands The Middle Aux Sable Creek is located near the northern property line REQUESTED ACTION: Map Amendment Rezoning Property from A-1 to R-1 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: Section 13.07 – Map Amendment Procedures SURROUNDING LAND USE Location Adjacent Land Use Adjacent Zoning Land Resource Management Plan Zoning within ½ Mile North Agricultural A-1 Rural Res.; Trans. Corridor A-1; A-1 SU South Agricultural/Residential A-1 Rural Estate Res.; Comm.; Trans. Corridor A-1 East Agricultural/Residential A-1 Rural Res. A-1 West Agricultural/Residential A-1 Rural Res.; Comm.; Trans. Corridor A-1; B-3 Two (2) houses are located east of the property; one (1) house is located to the south of the property; one (1) house is located west of the property. Commonwealth Edison also has a planned area along the east side of Route 47. PHYSICAL DATA ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT EcoCAT Report submitted and consultation was terminated. NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY LESA Score was 200 indicating a low level of protection. ACTION SUMMARY KENDALL TOWNSHIP Petition information was sent to Kendall Township 2.20.18. ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier –February 20, 2018 Page 3 of 3 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE Petition information was sent to the United City of Yorkville 2.20.18. GENERAL INFORMATION The petitioner desires the map amendment in order to have the ability to construct a house on the property at some point in the future. The subject property does not have an allocation for the construction of a home and does not possess forty (40) acres. Therefore, a map amendment is required in order to construct a home onsite. The petitioner does not believe that the property is large enough for farming. Pictures of the property are included. The Land Resource Management Plan calls for this area to be rural residential in the future. Existing single- family homes are located around the subject property. For these reasons, Staff does not believe that the approval of this request would constitute spot zoning. The property is currently for sale. BUILDING CODES Any new homes or accessory structures would be required to meet applicable building codes. ACCESS The property fronts Walker Road. Pending comments from Kendall Township, Staff has no concerns regarding the ability of Walker Road to support a proposed home at this location. ODORS No new odors are foreseen. LIGHTING Any new lighting would be for residential use only. Staff does not foresee any concerns regarding lighting. SCREENING No fencing or buffer is presently planned for the property. Any new fences or plantings would be for a residential use. Any new fences would have to follow applicable regulations. STORMWATER The northern portion of the property touches the Middle Aux Sable Creek. Any new homes would have to be constructed per Kendall County’s Stormwater Management Ordinance. UTILITIES Electricity is near the property. A new well and septic system would have to obtain applicable permits. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed map amendment. ATTACHMENTS 1. Application Materials (Including the Petitioner’s Findings of Fact, Plat, and EcoCat) 2. NRI Executive Report 3. Aerial 4. Looking North 5. East Side of Property 6. West Property Line (Spring Picture) 7. Looking South (Spring Picture) NATURAL RESOURCE INFORMATION (NRI) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT: 1703 June 2017 Petitioner: Keith & Kathleen Warpinski Contact: Attorney Daniel J. Kramer Prepared by: Kendall County Soil & Water Conservation District 7775A Route 47 • Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Phone: (630)553-5821 x3 • Fax: (630)553-7442 www.kendallswcd.org 1703 Executive Summary June 12, 2017 Petitioner: Keith & Kathleen Warpinski Contact Person: Attorney Daniel J. Kramer County or Municipality the petition is filled with: Kendall County Location of Parcel: SE¼ Section 21 T.36N.-R.7E. (Kendall Township) of the 3rd Principal Meridian in Kendall Co., IL Project or Subdivision Name: N/A Existing Zoning & Land Use: A-1 Agricultural; Vegetation, Trees Proposed Zoning & Land Use: R-1; Single Family Home Proposed Water Source: Well Proposed Type of Sewage Disposal System: Septic Proposed Type of Storm Water Management: None Size of Site: 6.9 acres Land Evaluation Site Assessment (LESA) Score: 200 Natural Resource Concerns Soil Map: SOIL INFORMATION: Based on information from the United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) 2008 Kendall County Soil Survey, this parcel is shown to contain the following soil types (please note this does not replace the need for or results of onsite soil testing; please refer to onsite soil test results for planning/engineering purposes): Table 1: Map Unit Soil Name Drainage Class Hydrologic Group Hydric Designation Farmland Designation 60C2 La Rose silt loam, 5-10% slopes, eroded Moderately well drained C Non-hydric Farmland of Statewide Importance 145B Saybrook silt loam, 2-5% slopes Moderately well drained C Non-hydric Prime Farmland 152A Drummer silty clay loam, 0-2% slopes Poorly Drained B/D Hydric Prime Farmland if drained Hydrologic Soil Groups: Soils have been classified into four (A, B, C, D) hydrologic groups based on runoff characteristics due to rainfall. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second letter is for undrained areas.  Hydrologic group A: Soils have a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.  Hydrologic group B: Soils have a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet, consist chiefly of moderately deep to deep, moderately well drained to well drained soils that have a moderately fine to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission.  Hydrologic group C: Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission.  Hydrologic group D: Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. Hydric Soils: A soil that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part of the soil profile. Of the soils found onsite, 152A Drummer silty clay loam is classified as a hydric soil. Prime Farmland: Prime farmland is land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for agricultural production. Prime farmland soils are an important resource to Kendall County and some of the most productive soils in the United States occur locally. Of the soils found onsite, two are designated as prime farmland: 152A Drummer silty clay loam and 145B Saybrook silt loam. Table 2: Map Unit Surface Runoff Water Table Ponding Flooding 60C2 High February – April Upper Limit: 2.0’-3.5’ Lower Limit: 2.2’-4.0’ February – April Surface Water Depth & Duration: -- Frequency: None February – April None 145B Low February – April Upper Limit: 2.0’-3.5’ Lower Limit: 2.2’-3.8’ February – April Surface Water Depth & Duration: -- Frequency: None February – April None 152A Negligible January - May Upper Limit: 0.0’-1.0’ Lower Limit: >6.0’ January – May Brief, Frequent Surface Water Depth: 0.0-0.5’ January - May None Surface Runoff: Refers to the loss of water from an area by flow over the land surface. Surface runoff classes are based upon slope, climate and vegetative cover. Indicates relative runoff for very specific conditions (it is assumed that the surface of the soil is bare and that the retention of surface water resulting from irregularities in the ground surface is minimal). Ponding: Ponding is standing water in a closed depression. Unless a drainage system is installed, the water is removed only by percolation, transpiration or evaporation. Duration is expressed as very brief (less than 2 days), brief (2 to 7 days), long (7 to 30 days), very long (more than 30 days). Frequency is expressed as none (ponding is not probable), rare (unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions), occasional (occurs, on average, once or less in 2 years) and frequent (occurs, on average, more than once in 2 years). Flooding: Temporary inundation of an area caused by overflowing streams, by runoff from adjacent slopes, or by tides. Water standing for short periods after rainfall or snowmelt is not considered flooding, and water standing in swamps and marshes is considered ponding rather than flooding. Duration expressed as brief is 2 to 7 days and a frequent frequency means that it is likely to occur often under normal weather conditions. SOIL LIMITATIONS: According to the USDA-NRCS, soil properties influence the development of building sites, including the selection of the site, the design of the structure, construction, performance after construction and maintenance. This report gives ratings for proposed uses in terms of limitations and restrictive features. The tables list only the most restrictive features. Ratings are based on the soil in an undisturbed state, that is, no unusual modification occurs other than that which is considered normal practice for the rated use. Even though soils may have limitations, an engineer may alter soil features or adjust building plans for a structure to compensate for most degrees of limitations. The final decision in selecting a site for a particular use generally involves weighing the costs for site preparation and maintenance.  Not Limited: Indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use; good performance and low maintenance can be expected.  Somewhat Limited: Indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning, design or installation; fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected.  Very Limited: Indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or expensive installation procedures; poor performance and high maintenance can be expected. Conventional Septic System Rating Criteria: The factors considered are the characteristics and qualities of the soil that affect the limitations for absorbing waste from domestic sewage disposal systems. Soils that are deemed unsuitable for installation of an on-site sewage disposal system per the Kendall County Subdivision Control Ordinance may necessitate the installation of a non-conventional onsite sewage disposal system. For more information please contact: Kendall County Health Department located at 811 W. John Street, Yorkville, IL; (630)553-9100 ext. 8026. Limitations are listed below for dwellings with basements, dwellings without basements, and conventional sewage disposal systems. Please note this information is based on information compiled as part of the USDA- NRCS 2008 Soil Survey of Kendall County, IL and the Kendall County Subdivision Control Ordinance; this does not replace the need for site specific soil testing or results of onsite soil testing. Table 3: Building Limitations Soil Type Dwellings with Basements Dwellings without Basements Small Commercial Building Onsite Conventional Sewage Disposal System 60C2 Very Limited: Depth to saturated zone Somewhat Limited: Depth to saturated zone Somewhat Limited: Slope Depth to saturated zone Suitable 145B Somewhat Limited: Depth to saturated zone Somewhat Limited: Shrink-swell Somewhat Limited: Shrink-swell Suitable 152A Very Limited: Depth to saturated zone Shrink-swell Very Limited: Depth to saturated zone Shrink-swell Very Limited: Depth to saturated zone Shrink-swell Unsuitable Reason to avoided: Wet 0 20 40 60 80 100 Dwellings with Basements Dwellings without Basements Small Commercial Building Conventional Septic System % of Soil Type of Improvement SOIL LIMITATIONS Not Limited Somewhat Limited Very Limited 5 Building Limitations Map: Figure 2a: Dwellings with Basements Figure 2b: Dwellings without Basements 6 Kendall County Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA): Decision-makers in Kendall County use the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) system to determine the suitability of a land use change and/or a zoning request as it relates to agricultural land. The LESA system was developed by the United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) and takes into consideration local conditions such as physical characteristics of the land, compatibility of surrounding land-uses, and urban growth factors. The LESA system is a two-step procedure that includes:  LAND EVALUATION (LE) – The soils of a given area are rated and placed in groups ranging from the best to worst suited for a stated agriculture use, cropland or forestland. The best group is assigned a value of 100 and all other groups are assigned lower values. The Land Evaluation is based on data from the Kendall County Soil Survey. The Kendall County Soil and Water Conservation District is responsible for this portion of the LESA system.  SITE ASSESSMENT (SA) – The site is numerically evaluated according to important factors that contribute to the quality of the site. Each factor selected is assigned values in accordance with the local needs and objectives. The Kendall County LESA Committee is responsible for this portion of the LESA system. Table 4a: Land Evaluation Computation The Land Evaluation score for this site is 98, indicating that this site is predominately prime farmland well suited for agricultural production. Table 4b: Site Assessment Computation A. Agricultural Land Uses Points 1. Percentage of area in agricultural uses within 1.5 miles of site. (20-10-5-0) 20 2. Current land use adjacent to site. (30-20-15-10-0) 20 3. Percentage of site in agricultural production in any of the last 5 years. (20-15-10-5-0) 0 4. Size of site. (30-15-10-0) 0 B. Compatibility / Impact on Uses 1. Distance from city or village limits. (20-10-0) 20 2. Consistency of proposed use with County Land Resource Management Concept Plan and/or municipal comprehensive land use plan. (20-10-0) 0 3. Compatibility of agricultural and non-agricultural uses. (15-7-0) 7 C. Existence of Infrastructure 1. Availability of public sewage system. (10-8-6-0) 10 2. Availability of public water system. (10-8-6-0) 10 3. Transportation systems. (15-7-0) 7 4. Distance from fire protection service. (10-8-6-2-0) 8 Site Assessment Score: 102 Land Evaluation Value: 98 + Site Assessment Value: 102 = LESA Score: 200 The LESA Score for this site is 200 which indicates a low level of protection for the proposed project site. Note: Selecting the project site with the lowest total points will generally protect the best farmland located in the most viable areas and maintain and promote the agricultural industry in Kendall County. Soil Type Value Group Relative Value Acres Product (Relative Value x Acres) 60C2 5 82 0.3 24.6 145B 2 94 1.9 178.6 152A 1 100 4.7 470.0 Totals 6.9 673.2 LE Score LE= 673.2/6.9 LE=97.6 (98) LESA SCORE LEVEL OF PROTECTION 0-200 Low 201-225 Medium 226-250 High 251-300 Very High 7 Wetlands: The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s National Wetland Inventory map does not indicate the presence of a wetland on the project site. If a wetland is present and will be impacted by the project, a wetland delineation specialist, who is recognized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, should determine the exact boundaries and value of the wetlands. Floodplain: A portion of the parcel is located within the floodplain. Sediment and Erosion Control: Development on this site should include an erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with local, state and federal regulations. Soil erosion on construction sites is a resource concern because suspended sediment from areas undergoing development is a primary nonpoint source of water pollution. Please consult the Illinois Urban Manual (http://www.aiswcd.org/illinois-urban-manual/) for appropriate best management practices. 8 LAND USE OPINION: The Kendall County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) Board has reviewed the proposed development plans for Petitioner Keith & Kathleen Warpinski for the proposed Warpinski project. This parcel is located in Section 21 of Kendall Township (T.36N.-R.7E. of the 3rd Principal Meridian) in Kendall County. Based on the information provided by the petitioner and a review of natural resource related data available to the Kendall County SWCD, the SWCD Board has the following opinions and recommendations. The Kendall County SWCD has always had the opinion that Prime Farmland should be preserved whenever feasible. A land evaluation, which is a part of the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) was conducted on this parcel. The soils on this parcel scored a 99 out of a possible 100 points indicating the soils found on the project site are predominately prime farmland well suited for agricultural production. Overall, the LESA score was 200 indicating a low level of protection as selecting a project site with the lowest total points will generally protect the best farmland located in the most viable areas and maintain and promote the agricultural industry in Kendall County. Of the soils identified onsite, two (145B and 152A) are designated as prime farmland; the remaining soil (60C2) is noted as farmland of statewide importance. For proposed land uses, soils can have potential limitations. This report indicates that for soils located on the parcel, 72% of the soils are very limited for dwellings with basements; 68% of the soils are very limited for dwellings without basements, small commercial building and conventional septic systems. This information is based on the soil in an undisturbed state and does not replace the need for site specific soil testing. Some soil reclamation, special design, or maintenance may be required to obtain suitable soil conditions to support development with significant limitations. Additionally, if the scope of the project includes the use of onsite septic systems, please consult with the Kendall County Health Department. This site is located within the Illinois River Watershed and Middle Branch Aux Sable Creek subwatershed. This development should include a soil erosion sediment control plan to be implemented during construction. Sediment may become a primary non-point source of pollution. Eroded soils during the construction phase can create unsafe conditions on roadways, degrade water quality and destroy aquatic ecosystems lower in the watershed. For intense project uses it may be necessary to have a drainage tile survey completed on the parcel to locate any subsurface drainage tile if suspected onsite. Drainage tile expedites drainage and facilitates farming. It is imperative that these drainage tiles remain undisturbed. Impaired tile may affect a few acres or hundreds of acres of drainage. The information that is included in this Natural Resources Information Report is to assure the Land Developers take into full consideration the limitations of that land that they wish to develop. Guidelines and recommendations are also a part of this report and should be considered in the planning process. The Natural Resource Information Report is required by the Illinois Soil and Water Conservation District Act (Ill. Complied Statues, Ch. 70, Par 405/22.02a). RD.PENMAN-002 -003 -004 -006 -007 -013-014-011-010 -008 -005 37.39 1273.84281.09 78. .84 610700 R131066 204 1401.21270 691.65 407.534.2711.4370.328.4341435 158. .71.15 178.441259.591 3 4 Middle Aux Sa b l e Creek 38.50 6.05 5.005.005.0074.18 3.01 6.575.20 5.34 80.34 Walker Rd Penman RdMiddle Aux Sable Creek ´ This work is provided as is, without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The information represented may contain proprietary and confidential property of Kendall County Illinois. Under United States Copyright protection laws you may not use, reproduce, or distribute any part of this document without prior written permission. To obtain written permission please contact Kendall County GIS at 111 W Fox St, Yorkville, IL 60560. 05-21-400-011Kendall Twp.Kendall County Illinois 0 140 280 420 Feet 1 inch = 100 feet Created : 02/22/2017 Aerial: Spring 2016 Making, Adopting and Amending Motions: a guide for Presiding Officers and Assembly Members Christina L. Emmert, RDH, RP hygiene93@gmail.com September 2017 Main Motion•RONR-IB Chapter 3 •Introduction brings business before an assembly •No debate on a matter before a motion has been made •Only one main motion may be before the assembly for action at a time How you get to speak at a meeting •Stand after previous speaker has finished •“Madam(Mister) President” or appropriate title •Chair recognizes you by stating your name or title •You now have the floor •When you are finished, you sit down, and thus yield the floor How to make a motion•Once you obtain the floor simply state “I move that…” •Important to state precisely the words of the motion •Chair can assist with wording if needed •Exact wording to be voted on to be put in the minutes by the Secretary •Good practice to write out your motion, sometimes required by the chair, or assembly rules •Immediately sit after making motion, wait to give reasons for proposal Next steps for motion•Once a member makes a motion, another member must second the motion for the motion to be considered by the group •Seconder does not necessarily have to agree, just means they want to discuss the motion •Member simply calls out “Second!” from their seat, you do not have to be recognized Stating the Question•Once a motion has been moved and seconded, the chair states the question •Chair simply says “It is moved and seconded that…” •Once the chair states the question, it is before the group for consideration, important for two reasons: •First, the group must know exactly what is being proposed •Second, the chair must determine if the motion is in order at the time, and the chair must ensure the motion is clearly phrased. Script for motions•Member A: (standing) Madam Chair! •Chair: The chair recognizes Member A •Member A: I move that the City of Yorkville buy the secretary a new computer. (member sits) •Member B: Second! •Chair: It is moved and seconded that the City of Yorkville buy the secretary a new computer. Are you ready for the question? Debate•RONR-IB Chapter 4 •Means the discussion on the merits of the question- that is whether the proposed action should or should not be taken. •Chair normally turns towards the maker of the motion to see if he or she wishes to be assigned the floor first. •RONR allows debate twice on any debatable motion for 10 minutes each time on the same day. •Cannot save time or transfer it to someone else. Debate•Who gets preference in Recognition to Debate? •Generally, the Chair should recognize the first person who rises first after the previous speaker has finished and sat down. •Maker of the motion has the right to speak first, immediately after the chair has stated the motion. •Member cannot speak a second time until everyone who wants to speak has had a chance to speak first. •If the chair knows speakers have opposing opinions, he or she should try to alternate between speakers who favor the motion and those who oppose the motion. Debate•Debate must be germane, meaning that your remarks must have bearing on whether or not the pending motion should be adopted. Going off on irrelevant topics is not in order. •Debate issues, not personalities. No personal attacks towards opposing views. Cannot debate by saying someone else’s statement is false. “I believe there is strong evidence that the member is mistaken” •Speak directly to the chair, not other members. Do not address a member by name telling them their statement is ridiculous. Instead address the chair “The last speaker’s point did not make sense” •Ask questions of another member through the chair as well. Putting the Question•When no one else seeks recognition to debate, the chair may ask “Are you ready for the Question?” Or “Is there any further debate?” •Chair then states “The question is on the adoption of the motion that the City of Yorkville buy the secretary a new computer” •Most main motions require a majority vote, chair to give directions on what vote is required, some require a 2/3 vote •Abstentions do not count, only number of votes cast •Most common type of voting is voice vote. The chair says “All those in favor, say aye.” Those is favor stay seated and call out “aye” •Chair then states “All those opposed, say no.” The opponents say “no.” Announcing result of vote•After voting is complete, chair announces result: 1) reports which side “has it” 2) declares that the motion is adopted or lost; and 3) indicates the effect of the vote, if needed •Immediately after announcing the result of the vote, the chair announces the next item of business, when applicable. Script for voting on a question•Chair: Are you ready for the question? (Pause) The question is on the adoption of the motion that the City of Yorkville buy the secretary a new computer. Those in favor say aye. (Pause) Those in favor say no. (Pause) The ayes (noes) have it and the motion is adopted (lost). The City of Yorkville will (will not) buy the secretary a new computer. The next item of business is _____. OR Is there further new business? Amendments•RONR-IB chapter 5 •Member can agree with the idea of a main motion, but wants to improve it. •Modifies the wording, and within limits, often the meaning of the motion. •Amendments must say exactly where in the main motion the change is to be made and precisely what words to use. •Often required that amendments be submitted in writing. •Vote on an amendment does not decide if the main motion is adopted, only whether the wording in the main motion will be changed. Amendments-Insert or Add •Insert or add words Motion to add words at the ends of a motion or insert words in between other words. Main Motion is: “That the committee hosts a dinner in August.” You want the motion to read: “That the committee host a dinner in honor of the Mayor in August.” This requires inserting the words “in honor of the Mayor” after “dinner.” Amendments-Insert or Add•After being recognized by the chair, you say, “I move to insert the words ‘in honor of the mayor’after the word dinner.” (If you wanted words to be put at the end of the motion, you would say “I move to add the word(s)…” Some other member must second the amendment, the chair states it, and debate goes on as in a main motion. The chair then puts the question on the amendment to a vote. The chair: 1)States the amendment; 2)Gives the main motion as it would read if the amendment were to be adopted; and 3)Makes clear once more what the amendment that is to be debated or voted on. Amendment-Insert, scriptChair:The question is on the motion “That the committee hosts a dinner in August.” Are you ready for the question?” Member A: (Stands) Madam President! Chair:The chair recognizes Member A. Member A: I move to insert the words “in honor of the mayor” after dinner. (Sits when finished) Another member: (seated) Second! Chair: It is moved and seconded that the words “in honor of the mayor” are inserted after dinner. If the amendment is adopted, the motion will read “That the committee hosts a dinner in honor of the mayor in August.” The question is on inserting the words “in honor of the mayor.” Amendment-Insert, script(Debate) Chair: Are you ready for the question?... The question is on inserting the words “in honor of the mayor” after “dinner.” If the amendment is adopted the main motion will read “That the committee hosts a dinner in honor of the mayor in August.” Those in favor of inserting the words “in honor of the mayor” says aye. Some members (seated): Aye! Chair: Those opposed, say no. Other members (seated): No! Chair: The ayes have it, and the amendment is adopted. The question is now on the main motion as amended, “That the committee hosts a dinner in honor of the mayor in August.” Is there any further debate? Amendment-Insert Script•(Debate) •Chair: “Are you ready for the question?” (pause) “The question is ‘That the committee hosts a dinner in honor of the mayor in August’; “All those in favor say ‘aye’ •Most members (seated): Ay e! •Chair: Those opposed, say no. •Other members (seated): No! •Chair: “The ayes have it, and the committee will host a dinner in honor of the mayor in August” Dealing with Challenging attendees •The chair must remain calm •Do not raise voice louder than the attendee •Do no bang gavel •Politely remind attendee of rules •If it is known that there will be controversy at a meeting, good idea to have a sergeant at arms, security or police personnel that is willing to escort disruptive attendees from the room Dealing with Challenging attendees •When there is an expectation for a challenging or potentially controversial meeting, extra preparation is warranted. Most of us don’t respond well to surprises, and this statement is never truer than in meetings. When there is potential for controversy, get the key people together and review the agenda, item by item. During that review of each item on the agenda, ask the “what if” questions and determine how to handle them. Try to be creative in figuring out what could possibly happen and how to handle it. Remember, you cannot possibly think of every “what if”, but if you practice how to handle them, you are much more prepared for the meeting -Nancy Sylvester, MA, PRP, CPP-T Dealing with Challenging attendees •Chair should be a facilitator, not a dictator •Do not go into meeting thinking you know best, be open minded, help group come to best decision •Chair must keep the discussion on task, focus on the subject, not random ramblings that veer off subject a) Under 18 b)18 -34 c)35 -49 d)50 -65 e)Over 65 Which is your age group? A.Today! B.This week C.This month D.Within the last year E.Almost never Answer Now When was the last time you visited downtown? A.Food and Drink B.Work C.Recreation D.That’s where I live E.I don’t go downtown Answer Now Which is the primary reason you come to downtown? Where was the first place you lived as an adult? a) Friend’s couch b) Room in family member’s home c) Apartment with roommate d) Apartment by yourself e) Owned condo or house A.20 mph B.30 mph; posted speed C.40 mph D.Fast ; rather not say E.Not sure Answer Now How fast do you drive through downtown? A.Yes ; safe enough for my kids B.Yes; but not with children C.No; it’s too dangerous D.Unsure Answer Now Would you feel safe walking along Bridge Street? a) Shopping b) Residences c) Parks d) Parking What is missing from downtown? a) Small Town Street b) Shared Street c) Rustic Street d) Modern Main Street Which street character do you prefer? Should Bridge Street be downtown’s “front door”? a) Overhead Signage b) Architectural Symmetry c) Bridge over Bridge Street d) Overhead Lights Which is a preferred gateway element into downtown? •‘A’ Street •Primary •Walkable •Commercial •Engaging •‘B’ Street •Secondary •Service oriented •Parking access •Supports ‘A’ street ‘A’ vs. ‘B’ Streets ‘A’ Street (Ann Arbor, MI) A.Van Emmon Street B.Bridge Street C.Heustis D.Hydraulic Street Answer Now Which street do you most consider an ‘A’ Street? A.Leave it the way it is B.Improve it like a regular street C.Service ‘B’ Street for parking D.Unique, funky design change Answer Now What should be done with Hydraulic Street? a) Traditional b) Industrial c) Modern d) Mixture Which architectural character do you prefer? Would apartments and/or condos be a good fit downtown? Would townhomes or other attached housing be a good fit? How Stepbacks Can Preserve a Desired Character a) 2-story b) 3-story c) 4-story Should the Bridge Street façade height remain at 2-stories? A.Front of Bridge Street B.Backs of Bridge Street C.Courthouse Slope D.Hydraulic Street E.Unsure or Other Answer Now Which area is in the most need of immediate improvement? Which image most represents your vision of downtown? a)”Main Street” b) National, Retail Center Which image most represents your vision of downtown? c) Local, Casual Which image most represents your vision of downtown? A.“Main Street” B.National, Retail Center C.Local, Causal D.Other or Unsure Answer Now Which image most represents your vision of downtown?