The URL can be used to link to this page

Economic Development Packet 2018 04-03-18 AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, April 3, 2018 6:00 p.m. City Hall Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL Citizen Comments: Minutes for Correction/Approval: March 6, 2018 New Business: 1. EDC 2018-23 Building Permit Report for February 2018 2. EDC 2018-24 Building Inspection Report for February 2018 3. EDC 2018-25 Property Maintenance Report for February 2018 4. EDC 2018-26 Economic Development Update 5. EDC 2018-27 Kendall Marketplace – PUD Amendment for Signage 6. EDC 2018-28 Kendall Marketplace – PUD Amendment for Residential Lots 7. EDC 2018-29 Ashley Pointe Subdivision – Third Amendment to the Annexation Agreement and Amended Final Plat 8. EDC 2018-30 Sales Tax Incentive Update 9. EDC 2018-31 Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 10. EDC 2018-32 Goal 1 – Manufacturing and Industrial Action Plan – BNSF Site Certification Update 11. EDC 2018-33 Goal 1 – Manufacturing and Industrial Action Plan – YBSD Old Business: Additional Business: 2017/2018 City Council Goals – Economic Development Committee Goal Priority Staff “Downtown Planning” 1 Bart Olson & Krysti Barksdale-Noble “Southside Development” 2 Bart Olson & Krysti Barksdale-Noble “Manufacturing and Industrial Development” 4 Krysti Barksdale-Noble “Revenue Growth” 9 Krysti Barksdale-Noble “Capital Improvement Plan” 11 Bart Olson & Krysti Barksdale-Noble “Community Entrance Signage and Wayfinding” 14 Krysti Barksdale-Noble United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 www.yorkville.il.us UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, April 3, 2018 6:00 PM CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. March 6, 2018 □ Approved __________ □ As presented □ With corrections --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2018-23 Building Permit Report for February 2018 □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. EDC 2018-24 Building Inspection Report for February 2018 □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. EDC 2018-25 Property Maintenance Report for February 2018 □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. EDC 2018-26 Economic Development Update □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. EDC 2018-27 Kendall Marketplace – PUD Amendment for Signage □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. EDC 2018-28 Kendall Marketplace – PUD Amendment for Residential Lots □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. EDC 2018-29 Ashley Pointe Subdivision – Third Amendment to the Annexation Agreement and Amended Final Plat □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. EDC 2018-30 Sales Tax Incentive Update □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. EDC 2018-31 Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. EDC 2018-32 Goal 1 – Manufacturing and Industrial Action Plan – BNSF Site Certification Update □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. EDC 2018-33 Goal 1 – Manufacturing and Industrial Action Plan – YBSD □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Minutes Tracking Number Minutes of the Economic Development Committee – March 6, 2018 Economic Development Committee – April 3, 2018 Majority Committee Approval Minute Taker Name Department Page 1 of 3 DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, March 6, 2018, 6:00pm City Conference Room In Attendance: Committee Members Chairman Ken Koch Alderman Joel Frieders Alderman Carlo Colosimo Absent: Alderman Alex Hernandez Other City Officials Interim Assistant City Administrator Erin Willrett Community Development Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble Code Official Pete Ratos Senior Planner Jason Engberg Alderman Chris Funkhouser City Consultant Lynn Dubajic Other Guests Gary Neyer, Marker Inc. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Ken Koch at 6:00pm. Citizen Comments: None Minutes for Correction/Approval: February 6, 2018 The minutes were approved on a unanimous voice vote. New Business 1. EDC 2018-17 Building Permit Reports for January 2018 Mr. Ratos reported 43 total permits, 15 single family permits, (11 were B.U.I.L.D.) and also 10 commercial permits. No further discussion. 2. EDC 2018-18 Building Inspection Report for January 2018 There were 163 inspections, most of which were for Ryan Homes in Caledonia. No further discussion. 3. EDC 2018-19 Property Maintenance Report for January 2018 Mr. Ratos cited a case of an unsafe structure on S. State St. where the 98 year old owner does not reside in the house. Many offers have been made, however, the owner/bank will only accept a certain minimum amount. No further discussion. Page 2 of 3 4. EDC 2018-20 Economic Development Report for February 2018 Ms. Dubajic reported the following: 1. Owners of restaurant “1836” notified city of their immediate closure, plan to reopen with a new concept and new signage 2. Owner of banquet hall on Stagecoach has gotten building permit for exterior 3. Idea Marketing and Subway have left Fountain Village development Lower rents might encourage tenancy. 4. Owner of Kendall Marketplace has requested larger signs due to Rt. 34 expansion, working with potential junior box store that wishes to be on the signs. Another fashion store looking at this area. Residential building has also begun on the nearby lots. 5. Chicago Fire coming to Go For It Sports to hold free camps, dates to be announced. 5. EDC 2018-21 Kendall Marketplace SSA Amendment Ms. Noble said this amendment revises the SSA since some lots had been erroneously included. Attorney Orr has drafted the ordinance and it is recommended to move this forward to the March 13th Council consent agenda. 6. EDC 2018-22 Warpinski – Walker Road Rezoning – 1.5 Mile Review Mr. Engberg said the County had notified the city of a rezoning request on a 7-acre parcel on Walker Road from A-1 to R-1 and requires the 1.5 Mile Review. The ITEP Plan shows trails and the County and property owners were made aware. This matter moves to the Planning and Zoning Commission on March 14 and the committee was OK with this request. Old Business 1. EDC 2018-15 Developer Deposit Report/Ordinance Ms. Noble made some revisions after suggestions from the committee last month. Developer fees will increase from $5,000 to $25,000 with a minimum deposit of $2,500. An upfront engineering fee estimate will be provided and the developer can pay in full or replenish as necessary. Ms. Noble also noted 2 charges that would be removed from the changes suggested. All changes will be codified. Ms. Noble reached out to Gary Neyer of Marker Inc. since he had voiced concern about the high amounts. Mr. Neyer was present and said the plan review fees were much too high. He said they did a development in 2011 when plan reviews were done by the city in-house. He said just the earthwork is a very substantial cost. Alderman Colosimo asked how the proposed rates compare to the nearby cities and Ms. Noble said it was comparable. He does not want to scare developers away, while making sure the city covers their costs. He would like to see a fixed fee. As the project moves along, Alderman Frieders requested performance indicators. Alderman Funkhouser compared the proposed rates to other towns he had researched. He said the proposal will affect developers and he would like the rates tightened, though he prefers a fixed fee. Page 3 of 3 This proposal will move forward for a Public Hearing and will return to EDC in May. Mr. Sanderson and Ms. Noble will work together on the fee structure and invoices can be adjusted. Additional Business None There was no further business and the meeting adjourned at 6:47pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #1 Tracking Number EDC 2018-23 Building Permit Report for February 2018 Economic Development Committee – April 3, 2018 N/A N/A N/A Informational None All permits issued in February 2018. D. Weinert Community Development Name Department C:\Users\jbehland\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\Y805XFBK\Feb 2018.doc Prepared by: D Weinert UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUILDING PERMIT REPORT February 2018 TYPES OF PERMITS Number of Permits Issued SFD Single Family Detached B.U.I.L.D Single Family Detached Program Begins 1/1/2012 SFA Single Family Attached Multi- Family Apartments Condominiums Commercial Includes all Permits Issued for Commercial Use Industrial Misc. Construction Cost Permit Fees February 2018 45 6 2 12 0 16 0 9 2,755,869.00 248,008.35 Calendar Year 2018 88 10 13 12 0 26 0 27 6,085,054.00 471,022.48 Fiscal Period 785 63 70 24 0 137 0 491 65,547,956.00 2,537,949.22 February 2017 41 1 4 0 0 10 0 26 914,889.00 80,663.89 Calendar Year 2017 74 2 10 0 0 20 0 42 2,835,966.00 178,819.44 Fiscal Period 712 41 86 0 0 101 0 484 31,023,705.00 1,563,652.52 February 2016 32 0 8 0 0 7 0 17 1,633,170.00 116,157.38 Calendar Year 2016 51 0 8 0 0 17 0 26 1,801,812.00 118,557.38 Fiscal Period 510 7 62 0 0 112 0 329 16,056,917.00 942,988.46 February 2015 10 0 0 0 0 3 0 7 33,546.00 932.15 Calendar Year 2015 31 0 5 0 0 14 0 12 31,076,297.00 97,112.42 Fiscal Period 2015 460 2 52 0 0 87 0 319 50,319,614.00 879,009.19 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #2 Tracking Number EDC 2018-24 Building Inspection Report for February 2018 Economic Development Committee – April 3, 2018 N/A N/A N/A Informational None All inspections scheduled in February 2018. D. Weinert Community Development Name Department DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:42:25 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2018 TO 02/28/2018 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR _____ 009-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20160888 129 COMMERCIAL DR 18 02/22/2018 PR _____ 040-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20160894 1050 FREEMONT ST 02/27/2018 Comments1: 1ST FLOOR PR _____ 041-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 02/27/2018 Comments1: 1ST FLOOR PR _____ 013-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170311 2738 CRANSTON CIR 116 02/27/2018 PR _____ 014-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 02/27/2018 TK _____ 015-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 02/26/2018 PR _____ 013-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170314 2795 CRANSTON CIR 140 02/27/2018 PR _____ 014-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 02/26/2018 TK _____ 015-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 02/26/2018 BC _____ AM 013-STP STOOP 20170494 602 WINDETT RIDGE RD 159 02/28/2018 BC _____ 010-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170524 1800 MARKETVIEW DR 4 02/28/2018 Comments1: PARTIAL FINAL FOR STOCKING PR _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170612 2836 CRANSTON CIR 96 02/08/2018 PR _____ 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 02/08/2018 TK _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 02/08/2018 Comments1: BBOX KEYABLE OK TO TEMP PR _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170645 1985 MEADOWLARK LN 115 02/05/2018 PR _____ 017-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 02/05/2018 TK _____ 018-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 02/05/2018 Comments1: BBOX KEYABLE OK TO TEMP PR _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170648 927 N CARLY CIR 128 02/14/2018 PR _____ 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 02/14/2018 TK _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 02/14/2018 Comments1: BBOX KEYABLE OK TO TEMP PR _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170649 911 PURCELL ST 65 02/14/2018 DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 15:42:25 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2018 TO 02/28/2018 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 02/14/2018 TK _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 02/14/2018 Comments1: BBOX KEYABLE OK TO TEMP PR _____ 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170666 661 OMAHA DR 02/28/2018 PR _____ 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 02/28/2018 PR _____ 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 02/28/2018 PR _____ 004-RST FIRE OR DRAFT STOPPING 02/28/2018 PR _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 02/28/2018 PR _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170759 584 WINDETT RIDGE RD 167 02/02/2019 PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 02/02/2008 TK _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 02/02/2018 Comments1: BBOX KEYABLE OK TO TEMP PR _____ 007-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170796 2609 FAIRFAX WAY 251 02/07/2018 PR _____ 008-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 02/07/2018 PR _____ 009-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 02/07/2018 PR _____ 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 02/07/2018 BC _____ 011-INS INSULATION 02/14/2018 BC _____ AM 012-STP STOOP 02/28/2018 BC _____ 014-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 02/28/2018 PR _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170806 811 CAULFIELD PT 107 02/02/2018 TK _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 02/02/2018 Comments1: BBOX KEYABLE OK TO TEMP PR _____ 017-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 02/02/2008 TK _____ 014-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20170807 2465 WILTON CT 128 02/27/2017 Comments1: BBOX KEYABLE PR _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 02/27/2018 DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 15:42:25 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2018 TO 02/28/2018 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR _____ 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 02/27/2018 PR _____ 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170824 1100 W VETERANS PKWY 02/21/2018 PR _____ 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 02/21/2018 PR _____ 004-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 02/21/2018 PR _____ 005-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 02/21/2018 PR _____ 005-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170836 331 WESTWIND DR 34 02/22/2018 PR _____ 006-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 02/22/2018 PR _____ 007-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 02/22/2018 PR _____ 008-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 02/22/2018 BC _____ 009-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 02/27/2018 PR _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170841 3161 LAUREN DR 87 02/20/2018 PR _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 02/20/2018 TK _____ 019-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 02/20/2018 Comments1: COULD NOT KEY BBOX DUE TO FLOODED AREA A Comments2: ROUND IT. TK _____ 018-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20170842 505 SHADOW WOOD DR 106 02/13/2018 Comments1: BBOX KEYABLE OK TO TEMP PR _____ 019-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 02/13/2018 PR _____ 020-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 02/13/2018 PR _____ 005-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170859 982 N CARLY CIR 57 02/06/2018 PR _____ 006-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 02/06/2018 PR _____ 007-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 02/06/2018 PR _____ 008-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 02/06/2018 BC _____ 009-INS INSULATION 02/14/2018 BC _____ PM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170924 1705 CANDLEBERRY LN 22 02/01/2018 BC _____ PM 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170925 129 COMMERCIAL DR 18 02/27/2018 DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 15:42:25 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2018 TO 02/28/2018 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BC _____ 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170945 1414 ASPEN LN 86 02/21/2018 PR _____ 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170949 344 FONTANA DR 54 02/14/2018 PR _____ 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 02/14/2018 PR _____ 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 02/14/2018 PR _____ 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 02/14/2018 PR _____ 013-INS INSULATION 02/16/2018 PR _____ 014-STK STACK TEST 02/16/2018 BC _____ 015-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 02/21/2018 BC _____ 016-STP STOOP 02/21/2018 PR _____ 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20170960 465 SHADOW WOOD DR 33 02/21/2018 PR _____ 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 02/21/2018 PR _____ 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 02/21/2018 PR _____ 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 02/21/2018 PR _____ 013-INS INSULATION 02/23/2018 PR _____ 014-STK STACK TEST 02/23/2018 BC _____ 015-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 02/21/2018 BC _____ 016-STP STOOP 02/20/2018 BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20170961 3245 LONGVIEW DR 44 02/28/2018 BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 20170962 3204 PINEWOOD DR 37 02/06/2018 PR _____ 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 02/05/2018 PR _____ 005-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 02/05/2018 PR _____ 006-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 02/16/2018 BC _____ 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 02/21/2018 BC _____ 008-CRL CRAWL SPACE 02/21/2018 DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 15:42:25 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2018 TO 02/28/2018 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BC _____ AM 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 20170981 2731 PHELPS CT 268 02/28/2018 BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 20170982 2667 FAIRFAX WAY 258 02/07/2018 PR 11:30 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 02/14/2018 BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 20170985 3475 RYAN DR 3 02/06/2018 PR _____ 004-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 02/05/2018 PR _____ 005-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 02/05/2018 PR _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 02/16/2018 BC _____ 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 02/21/2018 BC _____ 008-CRL CRAWL SPACE 02/21/2018 PR _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20170986 562 SHADOW WOOD DR 96 02/07/2018 BC _____ 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 02/14/2018 BC _____ 008-CRL CRAWL SPACE 02/14/2018 PR _____ 009-STK STACK TEST 02/28/2018 BC _____ 010-INS INSULATION 02/28/2018 PR _____ 014-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 02/27/2018 PR _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20170987 582 SHADOW WOOD DR 94 02/07/2018 BC _____ 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 02/14/2018 BC _____ 008-CRL CRAWL SPACE 02/14/2018 BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20170988 3228 BOOMBAH BLVD 137 02/14/2018 BC _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 02/16/2018 BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 02/23/2018 PR _____ 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 02/26/2018 PR _____ 005-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 02/26/2018 BC _____ PM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 20170991 984 S CARLY CIR 109 02/02/2018 DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 TIME: 15:42:25 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2018 TO 02/28/2018 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 02/20/2018 BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20170992 996 S CARLY CIR 111 02/22/2018 BC _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 02/28/2018 BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 20170993 988 S CARLY CIR 110 02/08/2018 BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 02/20/2018 BC _____ AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170999 1571 CORNERSTONE DR 41 02/20/2018 BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20171002 2643 MCLELLAN BLVD 45 02/06/2018 BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 02/14/2018 BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 02/23/2018 PR _____ PM 004-WAT WATER 02/28/2018 BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20171004 2609 BURR ST 79 02/06/2018 BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 02/13/2018 BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 02/23/2018 PR _____ 004-WAT WATER 02/28/2018 BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180015 3303 CALEDONIA DR 77 02/23/2018 BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 02/27/2018 BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180016 542 SHADOW WOOD DR 98 02/28/2018 BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180017 3208 BOOMBAH BLVD 136 02/14/2018 BC _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 02/16/2018 BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 02/26/2018 PR _____ 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 02/26/2018 PR _____ 005-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 02/26/2018 BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180018 3182 LAUREN DR 115 02/23/2018 BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 02/27/2018 DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 TIME: 15:42:25 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2018 TO 02/28/2018 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180023 548 REDHORSE LN 138 02/05/2018 Comments1: ONE SLAT AT REAR OF FENCE IS NOT NAILED Comments2: AT BOTTOM STRINGER.4TH SLAT SOUTH OF 2ND Comments3: POST FROM NE CORNER POST. BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180033 2691 FAIRFAX WAY 261 02/14/2018 BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 02/23/2018 PR _____ 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 02/26/2018 BC _____ PM 001-OCC OCCUPANCY INSPECTION 20180045 1185 N BRIDGE ST 02/07/2018 BC _____ 001-OCC OCCUPANCY INSPECTION 20180047 234 GARDEN ST 6 02/06/2018 BKF _____ 002-OCC OCCUPANCY INSPECTION 02/07/2018 PR _____ 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180053 88 CROOKED CREEK DR 10 02/27/2018 PR _____ 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 02/27/2018 PR _____ 003-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 02/27/2018 DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 TIME: 15:42:25 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2018 TO 02/28/2018 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: APT APARTMENT, CONDO 2 BIP BUILD INCENTIVE PROGRAM SFD 52 BSM BASEMENT REMODEL 3 CCO COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 3 CRM COMMERCIAL REMODEL 7 DCK DECK 1 FNC FENCE 1 GEN STAND BY GENERATOR 1 REP REPAIR 5 SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 72 WIN WINDOW REPLACEMENT 1 INSPECTION SUMMARY: BKF BACKFILL 10 BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 6 CRL CRAWL SPACE 4 EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPECTION 11 ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 4 ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WATER 6 FIN FINAL INSPECTION 18 FOU FOUNDATION 9 FTG FOOTING 10 GAR GARAGE FLOOR 3 INS INSULATION 5 OCC OCCUPANCY INSPECTION 3 PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READY 13 PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 8 PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 4 REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 9 RFR ROUGH FRAMING 8 RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 7 RST FIRE OR DRAFT STOPPING 1 STK STACK TEST 3 STP STOOP 4 WAT WATER 2 INSPECTOR SUMMARY: BC BOB CREADEUR 57 BKF BRISTOL KENDALL FIRE DEPT 1 PR PETER RATOS 79 TK TOM KONEN 11 STATUS SUMMARY: C BC 5 C BKF 1 C PR 4 C TK 2 I BC 52 DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9DATE: 03/01/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 TIME: 15:42:25 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2018 TO 02/28/2018 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I PR 57 T PR 18 T TK 9 REPORT SUMMARY: 148 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #3 Tracking Number EDC 2018-25 Property Maintenance Report for February 2018 Economic Development Committee – April 3, 2018 Informational None Pete Ratos Community Development Name Department Page | 1 Property Maintenance Report February 2018 Adjudication: 9 Property Maintenance Cases heard in February 2/12/2018 N3588 804 Morgan St Junk, Trash, Refuse Dismissed N3589 107 E Washington St Motor Vehicles Dismissed N3590 506 W Hydraulic St Exterior Structure Dismissed N3591 1303 Evergreen Ln Boats Dismissed N3592 1945 Marketview Dr Building Code Permits Liable $75 N3593 2029 Raintree Rd Motor Vehicles Dismissed N3594 687 Parkside Ln Motor Vehicles Dismissed N3595 4562 Gardiner Ave Work Without Permit Dismissed Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Pete Ratos, Code Official CC: Bart Olson, Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Lisa Pickering Date: February 28, 2018 Subject: February Property Maintenance Page: 1 of 2 Case Report 02/01/2018 - 02/28/2018 Case # Case Date TYPE OF VIOLATION STATUS VIOLATION LETTER SENT FOLLOW UP STATUS CITATION ISSUED 20180062 2/27/2018 Signs with out permit IN VIOLATION 2/27/2018 20180061 2/26/2018 Sign blocking the view IN VIOLATION 2/26/2018 20180060 2/26/2018 Sign for renewal IN VIOLATION 2/26/2018 20180059 2/26/2018 Work with out a permit IN VIOLATION 2/26/2018 20180058 2/20/2018 Off Street Parking IN VIOLATION 2/21/2018 20180057 2/20/2018 Boat IN VIOLATION 2/21/2018 20180056 2/16/2018 Vehicle PENDING 20180055 2/16/2018 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 2/16/2018 20180054 2/16/2018 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 2/16/2018 20180053 2/14/2018 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 2/15/2018 20180052 2/14/2018 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 2/15/2018 20180051 2/13/2018 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 2/15/2018 20180050 2/13/2018 Snow Deposits on Street IN VIOLATION 2/14/2018 20180049 2/13/2018 Snow Deposits on Street IN VIOLATION 2/14/2018 20180048 2/12/2018 Snow Deposit on Street IN VIOLATION 2/13/2018 20180047 2/12/2018 Snow Deposit on Street IN VIOLATION 2/13/2018 20180046 2/8/2018 Snow Deposits on Street IN VIOLATION 2/8/2018 20180045 2/8/2018 Snow Deposits on Street IN VIOLATION 2/8/2018 20180044 2/8/2018 Snow Deposits on Street IN VIOLATION 2/8/2018 20180043 2/8/2018 Snow Deposits on Street IN VIOLATION 2/8/2018 20180042 2/8/2018 Car parked on the street after snowfall IN VIOLATION 2/8/2018 20180041 2/8/2018 Car parked on the street after snowfall IN VIOLATION 2/8/2018 20180040 2/8/2018 Car parked on the street after snowfall IN VIOLATION 2/8/2018 20180039 2/8/2018 Car parked on the street after snowfall IN VIOLATION 2/8/2018 20180038 2/8/2018 Car parked on the street after snowfall IN VIOLATION 2/8/2018 20180037 2/8/2018 Snow Deposits on Street IN VIOLATION 2/8/2018 Page: 2 of 2 20180036 2/7/2018 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 2/8/2018 20180035 2/6/2018 Accessory Structure CLOSED 20180034 2/6/2018 Boat CLOSED 20180033 2/6/2018 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 2/8/2018 20180032 2/6/2018 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 2/8/2018 20180031 2/2/2018 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 2/8/2018 20180030 2/2/2018 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 2/2/2018 20180029 2/2/2018 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 2/2/2018 20180028 2/1/2018 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 2/2/2018 Total Records: 35 3/1/2018 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #4 Tracking Number EDC 2018-26 Economic Development Report for March 2018 Economic Development Committee – April 3, 2018 N/A See attached. Bart Olson Administration Name Department 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 102  Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Phone 630-553-0843  FAX 630-553-0889 Monthly Report – for April 2018 EDC Meeting of the United City of Yorkville March 2018 Activity Downtown Redevelopment: - Continue working with Imperial Investments to identify a variety of businesses who may be potential tenant candidates for future and existing buildings. - Working with Minor Threat Restaurant Group to assist with any needs for the expedient opening of Pizza Riot and Rivers Edge Theatre. Development south of Fox River: - Continue working with Eleno Silva. Eleno has been issued an exterior building permit for the partially built structure in Sta gecoach Crossing. Exterior construction will begin very soon. - Working with broker from Fountain Village Center (Route 47 & 71), to identify perspective tenants so that center can begin a “renewal” process. A nail salon has signed a lease, and there is one other perspective tenant that is negotiating on approximately 4,000 square feet of space. This new business may be just the right catalyst to get the Center attracting other new business. Development north of the Fox River: - Kendall Crossing…Construction is moving along on the Holiday Inn Express and Banquet Facility. The Banquet and Event Center is now named “Kendall Gardens”. Plans for that building will be delivered to the City for review and building permit during the first week of April. Also, Kendall Hospitality has joined the Yorkville Area Chamber of Commerce as a Premier Member. All systems are GO!! - Kendall Marketplace…Working with Alex Berman (owner) to identify potential additional development on the project. The junior box is continuing to negotiate their lease. The final hurdle is signage. With the removal of the SSA from the attached single family portion, Alex and I have been meeting with potential residential builders, who may be interested in constructing the townhome component. I am also working with Alex and his brokers from Edgemark to determine whether the time is right is build a multi-tenant building on an outlot. - Continue to work with two National restaurants chains are looking closely at Yorkville. While I am unable to disclose the names of these two very familiar chains, I can state that one has put a piece of property under contract, and has now extended their contract. - Salerno’s Hot Dogs has withdrawn from the little “A” frame building on Route 34 just east of Route 47. - Culver’s is celebrating 12 years in Yorkville. It is time for a general remodel of the restaurant. To get this done correctly and quickly, the Yorkville Culvers will close on Sunday, April 8th at 3PM and will remain closed until Friday, April 13th at 10:30AM normal opening time). - Yorkville’s Aldi will also be building an addition onto their store. The store will remain open and fully operational during the construction. Industrial Development: - Working with Joyce Sloan, the industrial broker, who is the listing agent on Lincoln Prairie on Eldamain Road. - Continue working with small industrial user to locate in Yorkville. This business owner is a resident, and currently operates in a sur rounding community. I hope to be able to report more specifics in the next 30 to 60 days. Project is out for financing options at this time. Recreation: - Go for it Sports…continue working with the center, who now has their own Special Olympics team. The team is comprised of 10 area athletes from the ages of 7 to adult, who are training every Tuesday in hopes of making it to the state meet. Also, JC Health & Fitness is now operating in the facility. JC Health & Fitness offers personal training, monthly memberships and fitness classes. At this time, “Spring Break Camps” are being conducted at the facility, and “Summer Camps” are being formulated to meet the need of area families. Other Activity: - Attended the Open House for Anthony Place. - Attended Waubonsee Community College selection day for the awarding of scholarships of the 2018-2019 school year. Respectfully submitted, Lynn Dubajic 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 102 Yorkville, IL 60560 lynn@dlkllc.com 630-209-7151 cell Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #5 Tracking Number EDC 2018-27 Kendall Marketplace PUD Amendment for Signage Economic Development Committee - April 3, 2018 10/24/2006 Approval of Ord. 2006-125 Majority Approval Requested Planned Unit Development Amendment to increase the overall sign height for two (2) monument tenant signs. Krysti Barksdale – Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department 1 BACKGROUND & REQUEST: The applicant, Kendall Holdings I, LLC, is requesting an amendment to the Kendall Marketplace Planned Unit Development to permit an increase in overall sign height by five (5) feet for two (2) existing freestanding business monument signs which serve as the sole outdoor tenant signage for current and future tenants of the partially developed Kendall Marketplace commercial development. The approximately 150-acre commercial portion of the development, which has two (2) inline retail buildings with major tenant anchors, two (2) stand alone big-box retailers (Target and Home Depot) and various outlots, is a Planned Unit Development with underlining B-3 General Business District (formerly Service Business District) zoning. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) and subsequent development conditions were approved in 2006 via Ordinances 2006-88 and 2006-125 (see attached). While Ordinance 2006-88 approving development conditions for Kendall Marketplace did not address specific signage criteria, the subsequent amending Ordinance 2006-125 allowed for the for the installation of two (2) approximately 29’-4 H x 13’-0” W (192 square foot sign area) freestanding business monument signs located along US Rte 34 (Veterans Parkway) and near the intersection of Beecher Road and US Rte 34. According to the applicant, the proposed increase in height for the two (2) existing monument signs is needed to provide increased visibility for the remaining inline retail tenant spaces in the commercial development Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Jason Engberg, Senior Planner Date: February 27, 2018 Subject: PZC 2018-02 Kendall Marketplace PUD Amendment for Signage 731 - 795 Erica Lane 2 as these units are not immediately adjacent to a major roadway; as well as provide additional business identification along US Route 34 for the undeveloped commercial outlots. EXISTING & PROPOSED SIGNAGE: As previously mentioned, the two (2) 29’-4” tall existing tenant monument signs are located along US Rte 34 (Veterans Parkway) and near the intersection of Beecher Road and US Rte 34, and are oriented perpendicular to the roadway (see image below). The EDC may recall, the existing sign along US 34 was recently granted a variance to allow the sign to remain in its current location, although is now within the IDOT right-of-way as a result of the ongoing roadway widening project. The proposed reconstructed signs would increase the overall sign height to by five (5) feet to approximately 35”-0’ tall by removing the existing sign cabinets, inserting new steel pipes on top and installing a new cabinet piece near the bottom of the sign base and a sign cap/top. The new cabinet piece will allow for three (3) rows of new tenant panels per sign. All new tenant panels will be fabricated of the same aluminum material of the exiting sign panels, and will be routed for copy with push-through white acrylic. 3 All exposed metal surfaces will be coated with acrylic polyurethane for a seamless appearance. The tenant panels will be internally illuminated with LED lighting as the existing panels. The foundation materials of the monument signs will remain. Images of the proposed modified signs are provided below. STAFF ANALYSIS: The intent of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) is to provide flexibility from the rigidity of the conventional zoning/bulk/signage regulations, if there is a greater benefit to the property and the City as a whole. The applicant believes there is a greater benefit to offering new/existing in-line tenants as an incentive for extending or confirming new leases and to the future tenants of the remaining undeveloped outlots in the Kendall Marketplace development, should they be permitted to increase the overall height of the (two) existing freestanding signage by five (5) feet. The addition of six (6) new tenant panels will provide needed visibility for those businesses which do not have frontage along Veterans Parkway (US Route 34). The City has previously approved amendments to Planned Unit Developments for increases or new monument tenant signage which exceeds the maximum size and height requirement set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. The following table compares the proposed modified signs and recently approved signs with Planned Unit Development approval for commercial retail developments: 4 CURRENT ZONING ORDINANCE REGULATIONS FOR MONUMENT SIGNS HEARTLAND BUSINESS CENTER MONUMENT SIGN (2013) KENDALL CROSSING MONUMENT SIGN (2014) PROPOSED MODIFIED KENDALL MARKETPLACE SIGNS SIGN AREA (Section 10-20-9-A-1) • Max. 32 square feet for lots less than three (3) acres • Max. 64 square feet for lots three (3) or more acres. • Approx. 148 square feet • Approx. 472 square feet • Approx. 255 square feet SIGN HEIGHT (Section 10-20-9-A-1) • Max. 12 feet in height • 24 feet 8 inches • 31 feet 2 inches • Approx. 35 feet YARD REQUIREMENTS (Section 10-20-6-C) • Located at least 5’ from any driveway and lot line. • Signs taller than thirty inches (30”) shall not be located within that part of the yard or open area of a corner lot included within a triangular area twenty-five feet (25’) from the point of intersection of two street right of way lines forming a corner (line-of-sight). • Located within the front yard approx. eleven feet (11’) from the lot line and more than five (5) feet from a driveway or drive aisle. • Not located within a line-of-sight. • Located within a driveway median, but more than 5’ from an intersection. • Not located within a line-of-sight. • Located within IDOT right-of-way and less than five (5) feet from a driveway or drive aisle and lot line. • Not located within a line-of-sight. In staff’s review of the proposed PUD amendment, consideration was given to the relationship the existing and future in-line tenants have to where the sign is located for potential visibility opportunities along US Rte 34; recently approved amended PUD agreements of increased multi-tenant monument signage for similar type commercial developments and how the proposed modified sign does not significantly deviate from the intent of the originally approved PUD. STAFF COMMENTS: This request will require a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission at the April 11, 2018 meeting for formal recommendation. Notice of the proposed amendment will be published in the March 16, 2018 edition of the Beacon Newspaper and the applicant will be available at Tuesday night’s meeting to address the Economic Development Committee (EDC) regarding this matter. PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PZC 2018-02 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT Kendall Holdings I, LLC, petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting amendment to the Kendall Marketplace Planned Unit Development to permit an increase in overall sign height by five (5) feet for two (2) existing freestanding business monument signs for the purpose of added tenant panels in the Kendall Marketplace commercial development. The real property is located at 731-795 Erica Lane in Yorkville, Illinois. The legal description is as follows: LOTS 1-19, 21, 55 AND 57 IN KENDALL MARKETPLACE SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTIONS 19, 20 AND 29, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, RECORDED MAY 7, 2007 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 200700014779 IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PINs: 02-20-353-008 (Part of Lot l); 02-29-131-005 (Part of Lot 1 ); 02-29-1 01-001 (Lot 2); 02-29-101-002 (Lot 3); 02-29-101 -003 (Lot 4); 02-29-101-004 (Lot 5); 02-29-131- 001 (Lot 6); 02-29-131-002 (Lot 7); 02-29-131-003 (Lot 8); 02-29-131-004 (Part of Lot 9); 02-20-381-008 (Part of Lot 9); 02-20-381-007 (Lot 10); 02-20-381-006 (Lot I I); 02- 20-381 -005 (Lot 12); 02-20-381-004 (Lot 13); 02-20-381-003 (Lot 14); 02-20-381 -002 (Lot 15); 02-19-481 -002 (Lot 16); 02-20-353-004 (Part of Lot 17); 02- 19-482-001 (Part of Lot 17); 02-1 9-482-003 (Part of Lot 18); 02-20-353-005 (Part of Lot 18); 02-19-482- 002 (Part of Lot 19); 02-20-353-003 (Part of Lot 19); 02- 19-483-001 (Lot 21);02-19- 482-004 (Part of Lot 55); 02-20-353-006 (Part of Lot 55); 02-20-353-002 (Lot 57) NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT the Planning and Zoning Commission for the United City of Yorkville will conduct a public hearing on said application on Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 7 p.m. at the United City of Yorkville, City Council Chambers, located at 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. The public hearing may be continued from time to time to dates certain without further notice being published. Application and information materials regarding this notice are available for public review and any questions or written comments should be addressed to the United City of Yorkville Community Development Department, City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois. All interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing and will be given an opportunity to be heard. By order of the Corporate Authorities of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. BETH WARREN City Clerk BY: Lisa Pickering Deputy Clerk Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #6 Tracking Number EDC 2018-28 Kendall Marketplace PUD Amendment for Residential Lots Economic Development Committee - April 3, 2018 10/24/2006 Approval of Ord. 2006-125 Majority Approval Requested Planned Unit Development Amendment to revise the architectural standards for single family residential units in Kendall Marketplace. Krysti Barksdale – Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department 1 BACKGROUND & REQUEST: The applicant, McCue Builders, Inc., is requesting an amendment to the Kendall Marketplace Planned Unit Development (PUD) to permit a revision to Article III of the agreement regarding design standards for the new construction of single-family residential units within the currently platted, but undeveloped, portion of the property. The single-family residential portion of the development consists of 28 parcels on nearly 9-acres of land. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) and subsequent development conditions for the residential portion was approved in 2006 via Ordinance 2006-125 (see attached). Per this ordinance, special provisions for design standards were established for the single-family detached residential units which are as follows: 1. Masonry products shall be incorporated on the front façade of 75% of the total units. 2. A minimum of 75% of the front façade of each building shall incorporate masonry products. A 10% reduction of the required masonry area will be given for each major architectural feature on the front façade. 3. A minimum of 50% of each building elevation shall incorporate premium siding material. 4. Primary structures shall be constructed upon either a basement or foundation – “slab” construction shall not be used. According to the applicant, the current material and design standards for the exterior of the residential units is cost prohibitive and not keeping with the price point offered or warranted for the development. EXISTING & PROPOSED DESIGN STANDARDS: On June 14, 2005, the United City of Yorkville approved Ordinance No. 2005-51 which adopted an Appearance Code as part of the Building Regulations (see attached). Among the objectives of the Appearance Code is to foster sound and harmonious design of new buildings and sites, establish standards for new Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Jason Engberg, Senior Planner Date: March 22, 2018 Subject: PZC 2018-05 Kendall Marketplace PUD Amendment for Residential Lots Lots 24 -51 along Blackberry Shore Lane 2 construction and development and encourage creative non-monotonous community designs utilizing design professionals. Per this ordinance, the provisions of the Appearance Code is applicable to residential, commercial and industrial land uses seeking building permit approval for new construction, or building permit approval for additions to existing commercial or industrial buildings where the cumulative addition(s) are equal to 10% of the area or 200 sq. ft., whichever is greater. The City’s Appearance Code does not apply to industrial accessory structures (although these structures should complement the main structure), buildings where siding is being replaced with similar siding material, or any Planned Unit Development (PUD) already approved prior to the adoption of the ordinance unless so stipulated in the PUD. While the Appearance Code does provide specific criteria for both residential and non-residential uses, the regulations are very general in nature and relate mostly to anti-monotony standards (i.e., no two dwelling units with similar appearance shall be located adjacent to or across the street from each other) with regard to single family detached units and site planning and building design elements for single-family attached and multiple family dwelling units. Non-residential uses (commercial and industrial) Appearance Code standards focus on the relationship of buildings to the site, relationship of the site to the adjoining area and building design. Subsequent to the approval of the Appearance Code in 2005, the United City of Yorkville adopted new Comprehensive Plan Design Guidelines on May 26, 2009 (see attached). Unlike the Appearance Code Ordinance, the Design Guidelines were not codified as part of the Municipal Code and therefore, are advisory only. These guidelines are intended to “maintain the unique character and acknowledge the heritage of Yorkville” by establishing principles related to overall planning, site planning, landscaping and community character. Again, the applicability of these guidelines are limited to all new developments constructed after its adoption and does not apply to lots which have buildings constructed upon them prior to its adoption with the exception of properties substantially redeveloped, rezoned to which a special use is being requested. Substantial redevelopment consists of any construction activity that will result in a greater than 25% increase to the existing square footage or the addition of twelve (12) or more parking spaces. Staff has routinely referenced both documents in our review of applicable developments, with the most recent being the Kendall Crossing, Anthony Place Senior Apartments and Cedarhurst Living developments. Since most of the residential planned developments were approved through annexation agreements with ordinance and fee locks associated, staff has deferred to those documents during compliance reviews. Although the Kendall Marketplace PUD was approved after the adoption of the Appearance Code and would be subject to its standards, it was approved prior to the adoption of Design Guidelines and is not subject to those more specific aesthetic criteria. However, the PUD provided specific design provisions which were in addition to those required in the Appearance Code. The following page has a comparison chart of the existing Kendall Marketplace PUD design standards for single-family detached residential units, current Appearance Code standards and the applicant’s proposed amendments: 3 EXISTING KMP PUD DESIGN STANDARDS CURRENT APPEARANCE CODE DESIGN STANDARDS PROPOSED NEW DESIGN STANDARDS Masonry Products on 75% of the total units Minimum of 75% of the front façade of each building to incorporate masonry products. (10% reduction of the required masonry area will be given for each major architectural feature on front façade) Minimum of 50% of each building elevation to incorporate premium siding material. Primary structure shall be constructed upon either a basement or foundation – “slab” construction shall not be used. No residential dwellings shall be similar in appearance unless two (2) or more buildings of dissimilar design separate the buildings. A newly constructed residential building shall be dissimilar in appearance to another residential building across the street from, or adjacent to the newly constructed building. A residential dwelling on a corner lot is not considered similar to one adjacent to it if the two (2) dwellings face different streets. On cul-de-sacs not more than two (2) dwellings shall be similar in appearance on any lots having front lot lines contributing to the arc of the cul-de-sac. All homes shall have some type of covered porch on the front elevation. All homes shall have a 2-car garage with raised panel garage doors. All front elevation windows shall have grilles in the windows. All homes shall have architectural shingles. At least 75% of the homes shall have at least a 7/12 pitch on the main roof. At least 75% of the homes shall have at least a 10/12 pitch on the front gables At least 75 % of the homes shall have at least 25% brick or stone on the first floor elevation on the walls that run parallel to the street. Homes that do not have any brick or stone on the front elevation shall be required to have the following: -All windows on the front elevation shall have shutters or be wrapped with 4” trim -Windows in the upper panel of the garage door -Some type of Shake siding or Batten Board siding on front elevation. STAFF ANALYSIS: The intent of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) is to provide flexibility from the rigidity of the conventional regulations of the code while offering a greater benefit to the property and the City as a whole. The development’s existing standards, while specific to mainly building material, did not necessarily enhance architectural interest or encourage creative non-monotonous community design. Additionally, the current Appearance Code, which would be the default design standards if the PUD had not required the added provisions, solely focuses on similarities in dwelling appearances. However, the proposed new design standards proposed by the applicant requires at least three (3) architectural features on the front elevation of all homes (covered porches, grilles on windows and raised panel garage doors) in addition to higher grade roof shingles and steeper pitched roof slopes. For those homes with front elevations without masonry products, the applicant proposes window details, garage door features and premium siding materials. It is staff’s opinion that the proposed amended design elements for this development are more substantial than for newly constructed homes in other residential subdivisions approved under the current Appearance Code standards. 4 For your consideration, below are sample elevations of four (4) models of homes the applicant has planned for the Kendall Marketplace development: STAFF COMMENTS: This request will require a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission at the April 11, 2018 meeting for formal recommendation. Notice of the proposed amendment will be published in the March 16, 2018 edition of the Beacon Newspaper and the applicant will be available at Tuesday night’s meeting to address the Economic Development Committee (EDC) regarding this matter. Chapter 15 APPEARANCE CODE 8-15-1: OBJECTIVES: A. The fostering of: 1. Sound and harmonious design of new buildings and sites. 2. Greater interest in the development and redevelopment of business and industrial areas with an emphasis on appearance as it relates to each specific project, its surroundings and the community, by giving encouragement, guidance and direction. 3. Better maintenance of properties through encouragement of preservation, upkeep, protection and care. 4. Greater public interest and enthusiasm in overall community beauty, appearance, cleanliness and order. B. Establish standards for new construction and development with respect to, but not limited to, buildings, streetscapes and landscapes. C. Encourage creative nonmonotonous community designs utilizing design professionals. (Ord. 2005-51, 6-14-2005) 8-15-2: APPLICABILITY: A. The provisions of this code shall apply to: 1. Building permits for new construction applied for after the execution hereof; and/or 2. Building permits for additions to existing commercial or industrial buildings where the permit is applied for after the execution hereof and where the cumulative addition(s) is equal to ten percent (10%) of the floor area or two hundred (200) square feet, whichever is more; and/or 3. The standards in this code shall be prorated when being applied to additions to all principal buildings or major reconstruction (i.e., 25 percent of the facade is removed Page 1 of 9Sterling Codifiers, Inc. 4/11/2012http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php and/or different type of facade material is used and/or if the size of windows/doors are being modified by more than 25 percent) done tononresidential or attached single- family or multi-family buildings. 4. Additions and/or major facade work shall be assessed on a cumulative basis (i.e., if a 10 percent modification is conducted at one time and later another 10 percent modification is made, the cumulative impact is 20 percent and therefore, a 20 percent compliance ratio is expected). B. The provisions of this code shall not apply to: 1. Industrial accessory structures. However, all accessory structures should complement the main structure. 2. Those buildings where siding is being replaced with similar siding materials. 3. Any PUDs already approved prior to the adoption of this code unless so stipulated in the PUD. C. The provisions of this code shall be deferred until May 1, 2009, for lots located within the Fox industrial park. (Ord. 2005-51, 6-14-2005) 8-15-3: PROCEDURES: A. The city building official, or his/her designee, shall review the plan and/or drawing of the exterior design of every building and site to be constructed in the city for compliance with this code, prior to the issuance of a building permit. Building permits shall only be issued upon authorization of the city building official. B. Any appeals to this code or the city building official's determination of compliance with this code, shall be made in writing and submitted to the city building official. The city building official shall direct such requests to the facade committee, who shall make a recommendation to the city council. The city council's decision shall be final. C. The facade committee shall consider the following points prior to providing the city council with a written recommendation: 1. Will the objectives outlined in section 8-15-1 of this chapter be met if the requested deviations are granted? Page 2 of 9Sterling Codifiers, Inc. 4/11/2012http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 2. Is there a particular physical condition of the specific property and/or building(s) involved that would create a particular hardship to the owner, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of these regulations were carried out? 3. Will granting the requested deviation from these regulations be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which theproperty is located? 4. Will granting the requested deviation impair an adequate supply of light and air to buildings on the subject property or to the adjacent property? 5. Will granting the requested deviation increase the danger to the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood? (Ord. 2005- 51, 6-14-2005) 8-15-4: DEFINITIONS: ACROSS THE STREET: A lot with a side yard property line, when projected across the street, intersects the front property line of the subject lot. ADJACENT TO: Lots sharing a side yard property line. CONTIGUOUS LOT: Shares a common property line extended across the street with such lot. FRONT FACADE: The net surface area, excluding windows, doors and garages, that faces a street and includes a main entry to the building. MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES: Covered porches, boxed out bays/projections, decorative dormers, Juliet balconies, metal roofs. (10 percent credit for each) MASONRY PRODUCTS: Brick, stone, split face brick or architectural blocks. PREMIUM SIDING MATERIAL: Masonry products, cultured stone, natural wood siding and synthetic stucco. (Ord. 2005-51, 6-14-2005) 8-15-5: CRITERIA FOR APPEARANCE: A. General: Creativity and ingenuity in applying the standards and guidelines listed in this code are encouraged. Likewise, ingenuity and creativity, while considering deviations to the standards and guidelines of this code, are encouraged. Page 3 of 9Sterling Codifiers, Inc. 4/11/2012http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php B. Landscape And Site Treatment: 1. The provisions of the city of Yorkville's landscape ordinance shall apply. 2. Exterior lighting, when used, shall enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures shall be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent areas. Lighting shall be restrained in design and excessive brightness and brilliant colors avoided. Maximum illumination at the property line shall not exceed 0.1foot-candle and no glare shall spill onto adjacent properties or rights of way. 3. The provisions of this chapter in regards to bulk regulations, standards and off street parking; relating to trees and shrubs; all other ordinances, or portions of ordinances, which directly affect appearance, shall be a part of the criteria of this subsection. C. Residential: 1. Single-Family Detached And Duplexes: a. Unless stated otherwise within this chapter, no residential dwellings shall be similar in appearance unless two (2) or more buildings of dissimilar design separate the buildings. b. A newly constructed residential building shall be dissimilar in appearance to another residential building across the street from, or adjacent to the newly constructed building. c. A residential dwelling on a corner lot is not considered similar to one adjacent to it if the two (2) dwellings face different streets. d. On cul-de-sacs not more than two (2) dwellings shall be similar in appearance on any lots having front lot lines contributing to the arc of the cul-de-sac. e. For the purpose of this section, "similar in appearance" shall mean a residential building, which is identical to another, in combination with any four (4) or more of the following architectural characteristics: (1) Roof type (gable, hip, mansard, gambrel, flat, combination). (2) Height of roof ridge above finished grade of property. (3) Dimensions (height and length) and shape of the facades facing the front lot line. (4) Locations and sizes of windows, doors (including garage doors) and ornamental work on the facade facing a front lot line. (5) Type of facade, materials (i.e., brick veneer, lapped horizontal siding, half timber, board and batten, shakes, etc.) on the facade facing a lot line. (6) Porch dimension and elevation treatment. Page 4 of 9Sterling Codifiers, Inc. 4/11/2012http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php f. A building is considered dissimilar when less than four (4) of the above characteristics exist among subject dwellings. 2. Single-Family Attached And Multiple-Family: The intent of this chapter, specifically pertaining to single-family attached and multi-family buildings, is to create a "sense of community". Thiscan be achieved through careful site planning as well as thoughtful building design and color selections. a. The building footprint of single-family attached and multi-family buildings can be the same. However, the facade treatments must vary between buildings that are adjacent to one another. Facade variations may include building materials or colors in any one or more of the following: (1) Siding; (2) Masonry; (3) Roof; (4) Paint/stain; (5) Doors. b. Sites where requested setbacks and yards are less than the minimum zoning district requirements must provide an interesting relationship between buildings. c. Parking areas shall be treated with decorative elements, building wall extensions, plantings, berms and other innovative means so as to largely screen parking areas from view from public ways. d. The height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and adjoining buildings. e. Newly installed utility services, and service revisions necessitated by exterior alterations, shall be underground. f. The architectural character of the building shall be in keeping with the topographical dictates of the site. g. Masonry products shall be incorporated on the front facade of at least seventy five percent (75%) of the total buildings in the approved community, and shall incorporate a minimum of fifty percent (50%) premium siding material on the front facade. No less than half (25 percent of the total) of the minimum "premium siding" requirements must incorporate masonry products. Credit toward the remaining "premium siding" requirement can be earned via the use of major architectural features. Each major architectural feature used will earn a credit of ten percent (10%) towards the calculation of the minimum premium siding requirement. Example: A building with thirty percent (30%) masonry on the front elevation will require the use of two (2) "major architectural features" (10% + 10% = 20%) to comply with the total "fifty percent (50%) premium siding material on the front facade". Page 5 of 9Sterling Codifiers, Inc. 4/11/2012http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php h. Pedestrian features/amenities, such as covered walkways,street furniture, and bicycle rack facilities are encouraged. i. Common open space and outdoor features are encouraged. D. Nonresidential: 1. General Provisions: a. Relationship Of Buildings To Site: (1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape, and to provide for adequate planting, pedestrian movement, and parking area. (2) Site planning in which setbacks and yards are in excess of the minimum zoning district requirement is encouraged to provide an interesting relationship between buildings. (3) Newly installed utility services, and service revisions necessitated by exterior alterations, shall be underground. (4) The architectural character of the building shall be in keeping with the topographical dictates of the site. (5) In relating buildings to the site, the provisions of the zoning ordinance in regard to bulk regulations, standards, and off street parking shall be part of this criteria. This shall also apply to subsection D1b of this section. b. Relationship Of Site To Adjoining Area: (1) Adjacent buildings of different architectural styles shall be made compatible by such means as screens, site breaks and materials. (2) Attractive landscape transition to adjoining properties shall be provided. (3) Harmony in texture, lines and masses is required. (4) The height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and adjoining buildings. 2. Building Design: a. Commercial, Office And Institutional Uses: (1) Guidelines For Sites That Have Existing Buildings: (A) When adding an addition, distinct color variation to an existing building is prohibited. Page 6 of 9Sterling Codifiers, Inc. 4/11/2012http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php (B) When a site abuts a county, state or federal highway, and when an existing building is modified, the property owner shall be required, to the greatest extent possible, to meet the standards set forth belowfor the entire building. (C) If an additional building(s) is placed on the site, the additional building(s) shall, to the greatest extent possible, complement the architectural style of the principal building. (D) Any additional building(s) placed on the site shall, to the greatest extent possible, complement the materials and/or colors of the principal building on the site. (2) Guidelines For Unbuilt Sites: (A) Masonry products or precast concrete shall be incorporated on at least fifty percent (50%) of the total building, as broken down as follows: The front facade shall itself incorporate masonry products or precast concrete on at least fifty percent (50%) of the facade. Any other facade that abuts a street shall incorporate masonry products. The use of masonry products or precast concrete is encouraged on the remaining facades. (B) Creative layout and design of the buildings within the commercial, office or institutional development is encouraged. Use of windows or the impression of windows on all sides of the building and the utilization of a campus style layout are encouraged. Creative layout and design will help to decrease the overall mass of the development, to prevent monotony, and to improve the aesthetic quality of the development. (C) The height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and adjoining buildings. (D) Outlots shall reflect the style, materials, and/or design elements of the main building. In cases where the main building does not meet the design guidelines and standards (i.e., in terms of visual design materials and layout of the building), new outlot development proposals will be reviewed using the guidelines and standards contained in this chapter. (E) Pedestrian scale features/amenities, such as solid colored awnings, covered walkways, windows, street furniture, bicycle rack facilities and clearly defined entranceways are encouraged. (F) Common open space and outdoor seating areas are encouraged within commercial, office and institutional developments. (G) The location of parking lots in a manner that is logical, safe and pedestrian friendly is encouraged.In this respect, the location of parking lots in the rear or side of a building is encouraged. (H) Parking areas shall be treated with decorative elements, building wall extensions, plantings, berms and other innovative means so as to largely screen parking areas from view of public ways. Page 7 of 9Sterling Codifiers, Inc. 4/11/2012http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php (I) The location of drive-through facilities, including drive-through lanes, bypass lanes, and service windows, adjacent to a public right of way are not desirable and are discouraged. (J) Loading bays for commercial and office uses shall not be located in the front of a building or in the area abutting a public right of way. (3) Standards: (A) All commercial, office and institutional buildings shall consist of solid and durable facade materials and be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding area. (B) Masonry products shall not be painted. (C) Trash enclosures shall be located in areas that are easily accessible by service vehicles, but minimally exposed to the public street. Screening these enclosures with a material that is compatible with the principal commercial, office or institutional building is required. (D) Rooftop mechanicals shall be screened and enclosed in a manner that masks the equipment from view from all sides and is of the same character and design as the structure. Architectural features such as parapet walls and varying rooflines, are encouraged. Ground level mechanicals shall be screened by landscaping and/or fencing, as appropriate and shall be maintained year round. (E) When loading bays are placed where they can be viewed from a county, state or federal highway or from a city street designated on the comprehensive plan as an arterial or collector road, landscaping between the building and the street shall be such that within five (5) years of installing the landscaping, it can be reasonably assumed that the bay doors will be screened from the road. E. Industrial Uses: 1. Guidelines: a. Masonry products or precast concrete shall be incorporated onat least fifty percent (50%) of the total building, as broken down as follows: The "front facade" (defined as that facade that faces a street that includes a main entry to the building) shall itself incorporate masonry products or precast concrete on at least fifty percent (50%) of the facade. Any other facade that abuts a street shall incorporate masonry products or precast concrete. The use of masonry products or precast concrete is encouraged on the remaining facades. Where precast concrete panels or split face block is utilized, the use of colors, patterns, or other architectural features within these panels/blocks is encouraged. b. Building entryways shall be clearly identified. Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves and parapets shall be in proportion to one another. Page 8 of 9Sterling Codifiers, Inc. 4/11/2012http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php c. The location of parking lots in a manner that is logical, safe, and pedestrian friendly is encouraged. In this respect, the location of parking lots in the rear or side of a building is encouraged. d. Loading bays for industrial uses may be placed along the front of the building or the side(s) abutting a public right of way when there is an industrial use across from that facade. Otherwise, loading bays for industrial uses shall be discouraged from being placed in the front of the building or in the area abutting a public right of way. When loading bays are placed where they can be viewed from a county, state or federal highway or from a city street designated on the comprehensive plan as an arterial or collector road, landscaping between the building and the street shall be such that within five (5) years of installing the landscaping, it can be reasonably assumed that the bay doors will be screened from the road. 2. Standards: a. Industrial buildings shall consist of solid and durable facade materials and be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding area. b. Industrial buildings with facades greater than one hundred feet (100') in length shall incorporate recesses, projections, windows or other ornamental/architectural features along at least thirty percent (30%) of the length of the facade abutting a public street in an effort to break up the mass of the structure. c. Trash enclosures shall be located in areas that are easily accessible by service vehicles but minimally exposed to the public street. Screening these enclosures with a material that is compatible with the principal industrial building is required. (1) Rooftop mechanicals shall be screened and enclosed in a manner that masks the equipment from view from all sides and is of the same character and design as the structure. Architectural features such as parapet walls and varying rooflines are encouraged. Ground level mechanicals shall be screened bylandscaping and/or fencing, as appropriate. F. Signs: The provisions of this subsection are meant to supplement the city's sign code. All provisions of the sign code are in full force. Where conflicts between the two (2) regulations may occur, the more stringent requirement will apply. Wall signs shall be part of the architectural concept. Size, color, lettering, location and arrangement shall be harmonious with the building design, and shall be compatible with signs on adjoining buildings. (Ord. 2005-51, 6-14-2005) Page 9 of 9Sterling Codifiers, Inc. 4/11/2012http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #7 Tracking Number EDC 2018-29 Prestwick of Yorkville (YCHS) – 3rd Annexation Agreement Amendment Economic Development Committee - April 3, 2018 05/13-14 Approval of Ord. 2014-57 PC 2014-07 Majority Vote Requested 3rd Amendment to the Annexation Agreement regarding required access off of Ashley Road and IL Rte. 126 and Ashley Road intersection improvements. Krysti Barksdale – Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Summary As the EDC will recall, the petitioners, John and Michelle Stewart, purchased the incomplete Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision in March 2013 and were granted approval of an amendment to the original annexation agreement (Ord. 2013-56) with a revised final plat of Unit 2 to construct a new Christian high school focused on agricultural studies in October 2014. As originally proposed, the school would have a maximum student capacity of 850 students but would be constructed in phases with the first phase accommodating about 100 students. The 2013 overall site plan indicated a school size of approximately 25,000 square feet with primary school traffic occurring off of Ashley Road, as illustrated below. Since that time, the applicants have secured the a permit from the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) to make intersection improvements at Route 126 and Penman Road, work towards the completion of punch list items in Unit 1 of the subdivision, and obtain earthwork and foundation permits for the school site. However, no intersection or roadway improvements to IL Route 126 at Penman, intersection of Ashley Road and IL Route 126, nor the Ashley Road improvements adjacent to school lot have occurred. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: March 26, 2018 Subject: PZC 2018-04 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Request for 3rd Amendment to Annexation Agreement The petitioners are now seeking to amend the current annexation agreement to relieve them from completing required intersection improvements to Ashley Road and Illinois Route 126, and constructing an access roadway off of Ashley Road from the Yorkville Christian school site until such time homes in Phase II of the Prestwick (Ashley Pointe) development are being constructed. Additionally, and not part of the amended annexation agreement request, the petitioner’s have revised the overall layout of the school site and increased the building size to 52,000 square feet to accommodate the full student capacity. Project Background Below is a chronological bullet point summation of the City Council approvals related to this project since the purchase of the stalled development by the current petitioners:  Per the amended Annexation Agreement approved in 2013 (Ord. No. 2013-56) Lot 358 of the original Final Plat was resubdivided for the purpose of accommodating the new private high school.  Per Ordinance 2013-56, the developer was given credit against all City and County required road impact fees to which would be collected at time of building permit issuance based upon the understanding that the developer would make roadway improvements to IL Route 126 at Penman, Ashley Road and IL Route 126 intersection and Ashley Road improvements adjacent to Lot 358 where the new school will be located.  Per Ordinance 2013-56, the Developer agreed to provide all required security for the high school development and roadways.  Per Ordinance 2013-56, the City agreed to allow the school to open with forty percent (40%) of the required parking in place and the remaining sixty percent (60%) to be land banked and installed as determined by the City.  Ordinance 2014-57, approved in October 2014 authorizing the Final Plat for the school, stipulated in Exhibit B that the improvements to IL Route 126 at Penman and IL Route 126 at Ashley Road must be substantially completed prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the school.  Ordinance 2014-26, approved in May 2014, allowed for the release/reduction in the security requirements for the roadway completion as part of the development with the written acknowledgement and agreement by the Owner/Developer that no certificate of occupancy for the school or any other structure constructed on the property will be issued by the City until such time a deposit sufficient for the roadway improvements related to the Il Route 126 intersection with IDOT has been provided. Annexation Agreement Amendment Section 2 of the Second Amendment stated that “the Developer will provide any required security for the high school improvements, including roadways”. The developer requests that the annexation agreement be further amended to stipulate the proposed new language which is underlined and the removal of the existing annexation agreement language crossed out: The Developer acknowledges its responsibility for all required security for the high school improvements, including roadways; Owner/Developer agrees not to construct any access roadway from the Yorkville Christian School site to Ashley Road until the intersection improvements for Ashley Road and Route 126 are completed; the City agrees that no intersection improvements for Ashley Road and Route 126 shall be required to be made by Owner/Developer until such time as Phase II homes are being constructed in Ashley Pointe Subdivision (formerly known as Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision); the City agrees to release to the Developer/Owner any security for the roadway improvements related to the Route 126 intersection held by the City upon written acknowledgement by the Owner/Developer that it understands and agrees that no certificates of occupancy for any houses constructed as part of Phase II of Ashley Pointe Subdivision shall be issued by the City until such time as Owner/Developer has deposited sufficient security for the roadway improvements related to the Route 126/Ashley Road intersection provided, however, the City agrees to release to the Developer/Owner any security for the roadway improvements related to the Route 126 intersection held by the City upon written acknowledgement by the Owner/Developer that it understands and agrees that no certificate of occupancy for the school or any other structure constructed on the Property shall be issued by the City until such time as the Owner/Developer has deposited sufficient security for the roadway improvements related to the Route 126 intersection with the Illinois Department of Transportation (“IDOT”) and the City has received confirmation from IDOT of the receipt of such security. All other provisions of the original, First and Second amended annexation agreements will remain in effect. Traffic Study Analysis: The petitioner’s have provided an addendum to the original Traffic Study prepared in 2013 by KLOA Inc., transportation engineers. The original Traffic Study took into consideration the traffic impacts of the proposed school at maximum enrollment (850 students), Phase I and Phase II residential build out and the utilization of two (2) access roads that will serve the development, Ashley Road and the intersection of IL Rte 126 and Penman. Ashley Road was to serve as the primary access point for the school traffic, while IL Rte 126 and Penman would be a secondary access point for the school and the main access for the residential units. This report also assumed a 2% rate of traffic growth per year. At the conclusion of the study, it was determined that the addition of the new traffic generated from the school and full build-out of the Prestwick subdivision (Phases I and II) could be accommodated by the required roadway improvements to IL Rte. 126 and Penman, IL Rte. 126 and Ashley Road and Ashley Road. Further it was recommended that westbound left-turn lanes should be provided on Il Rte. 126 at the intersections with Ashley Road and Penman Road. The addendum prepared by KLOA, Inc. dated February 16, 2018, considered the revised site plan, school enrollment at full capacity (850 students) and the build out of only Phase I of the subdivision with the only vehicular access off of IL Rte. 126 and Penman Road. The report also projected a 1% rate of traffic growth per year. The findings of the traffic addendum concluded the connection to Ashley Road for the school was not needed to accommodate the estimated traffic generated by both the school and the complete build-out of the residential homes in Phase I of the development. Staff Comments: Staff is not supportive of postponing the roadway improvements (access point) off of Ashley Road adjacent to the school site until such time Phase II of the development has commenced construction, as the intent of the original annexation agreement amendment (Ord. 2013-56) and subsequent approvals related to this development were contingent upon the roadway improvements being completed. Further, the assumptions in the addendum to the traffic study were incongruent with those used in the original study. Staff has shared these concerns with the Petitioner and stated this will need to be addressed prior to any final recommendation regarding the amended request. While the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) expressed concerns in 2008-2009 with the previous developer utilizing the current IL Rte. 126 and Penman intersection for residential vehicular traffic (it was only intended for construction traffic), the petitioner is committed to completing these roadway improvements before being issued final occupancy permits for any new residential construction in Phase I or for the school building. Additionally, staff has requested the petitioners obtain IDOT’s written opinion on the proposed revised traffic study and postponed roadway improvements. Should the City consider the requested postponement of the improvements, staff recommends not tying the trigger for construction to the development of Phase II (which has not been final platted), but to a fixed number of permits issued in Phase I, specifically after the issuance of the 75th building permit for certificate of occupancy, the developer would be required to commence construction of the roadway improvements off of Ashley Road and be completed within three (3) years of the date the 75th building permit for certificate of occupancy or no further building permits will be issued in either phase of the development. This recommendation is predicated on the satisfactory analysis of the traffic study and upon confirmation from IDOT that the additional traffic from the school through the IL Rte 126 and Penman intersection is acceptable. Additionally, it is also staff’s reasoning to support the proposed amendment based upon the petitioners expressing that funding is needed from the sale of the residential lots within Phase I to finance the cost of the Ashley Road access and the Ashley Road and IL Rte. 126 intersection improvements. The petitioners are currently negotiating a contract with a nation-wide builder to purchase lots in a series of four (4) take-downs of approximately 25 lots per “grab”. This would allow the petitioner to sell off approximately 75 units in three (3) take downs before having to commence the roadway improvements. Conversely, there are no active buyers for Phase II of the Prestwick (Ashley Pointe) development. Staff would further recommend if the postponement of the Ashley Road improvements are approved, that the developer would be required to post a sufficient security deposit in the form of a letter of credit, bond or cash to cover the required work. A Plan Council meeting was conducted on March 22, 2018 between staff and the petitioners where these concerns and recommendations were discussed. The petitioner seem amendable to the recommendations and are considering providing an emergency access drive off of Ashley Road for first responder entry. Further, staff suggested that the petitioners reach out to the existing residential homeowners within the Prestwick subdivision prior to the public hearing regarding the proposed amendment, since formal notification by certified mailing is not required for annexation agreement amendments. Comments from that meeting prepared by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer are attached for your reference. This matter is tentatively scheduled to be considered at a public hearing on April 10, 2018 before the City Council. A copy of the public hearing notice posted in the Beacon Newspaper on March 16th has also been attached. Should the Economic Development Committee have question regarding this matter, staff and the petitioners will be available at Tuesday night’s meeting. Attachments: 1. Copy of Petitioners’ Amended Annexation Agreement Application. 2. Ordinance No. 2013-56 1st Amended Annexation Agreement. 3. Ordinance No. 2014-26 2nd Amended Annexation Agreement. 4. Plan Council Memorandum dated March 13, 2018 prepared by the Community Development Director. 5. EEI Review letter dated March 14, 2018 prepared by Brad Sanderson, City Engineer. 6. Copy of Public Notice I have reviewed the following documents: Final Plat of Subdivision date revised February 21, 2018; Overall Site Plan dated February 2, 2018 prepared by HR Green; and Traffic Study Addendum dated February 16, 2018 prepared by KLOA. I have also reviewed the proposed draft Third Amendment to the Annexation Agreement of the Yorkville Farms Development and the United City of Yorkville (Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision) dated February 27, 2018 and prepared by Patti Bernhard, attorney, of Dommermuth, Cobine, West, Gensler, Philipchuck, Corrigan and Bernhard, Ltd. regarding the Prestwick of Yorkville development generally located in the southwest quadrant of Rte. 126 and Ashley Road. Based upon my review and those of other city and local agency staff members of these plans and documents, I have compiled the following comments: General Comments: • Per the amended Annexation Agreement approved in 2013 (Ord. No. 2013-56) Lot 358 of the original Final Plat was resubdivided for the purpose of accommodating the new private high school. • Per Ordinance 2013-56, the developer was given credit against all City and County required road impact fees to which would be collected at time of building permit issuance based upon the understanding that the developer would make roadway improvements to IL Route 126 at Penman, Ashley Road and IL Route 126 intersection and Ashley Road improvements adjacent to Lot 358 where the new school will be located. • Per Ordinance 2013-56, the Developer agreed to provide all required security for the high school development and roadways. • Per Ordinance 2013-56, the City agreed to allow the school to open with forty percent (40%) of the required parking in place and the remaining sixty percent (60%) to be land banked and installed as determined by the City. • Ordinance 2014-57, approved in October 2014 authorizing the Final Plat for the school, stipulated in Exhibit B that the improvements to IL Route 126 at Penman and IL Route 126 at Ashley Road must be substantially completed prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the school. • Ordinance 2014-26, approved in May 2014, allowed for the release/reduction in the security requirements for the roadway completion as part of the development with the written acknowledgement and agreement by th e Owner/Developer that no certificate of occupancy for the school or any other structure constructed on the property will be issued Memorandum To: Plan Council From: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: March 13, 2018 Subject: PZC 2018-04 Prestwick of Yorkville Annexation Agreement & Final Plat Amendment Submittal by the City until such time a deposit sufficient for the roadway improvements related to the Il Route 126 intersection with IDOT has been provided. • As of the date of this memorandum, no intersection or roadway improvements to IL Route 126 at Penman, intersection of Ashley Road and IL Route 126, nor the Ashley Road improvements adjacent to Lot 358 have occurred. Amended Final Plat of Subdivision/Overall Site Plan Comments: • Per Section 10-16-3 of the Zoning Ordinance, off-street parking requirements for high schools are calculated as 0.25 per student plus 1 per staff. Phase 1 of the school development anticipates 100 students and 20 staff members, thereby requiring a minimum of 45 parking stall. The developer proposes to install 144 parking spaces in Phase 1. The minimum parking requirements have been met. • Would the developer be amenable to sign Mustang Way for the entire length of the street rather than bifurcating the street into two (2) names, Mustang Way and Whitekirk Lane? It is understood that Whitekirk Lane was approved and platted in the existing Unit 1 Final Plat, but have suggested this change for ease of use. • Additional comments regarding the Final Plat of Subdivision will be provided by the City’s engineering consultant, Engineering Enterprises, Inc. under a separate memorandum. Amended Annexation Agreement Comments: • Staff is not supportive of postponing the roadway improvements (access point) off of Ashley Road adjacent to the school site until such time Phase II of the development has commenced construction, as the intent of the original annexation agreement amendment (Ord. 2013-56) and subsequent approvals related to this development were contingent upon the roadway improvements being completed. • Should the City consider the requested postponement of the improvements, we would recommend not tying the trigger for construction to the development of Phase II (which has not been final platted), but to a fixed number of permits issued in Phase I, such as after the issuance of the 1st 50 certificate of occupancies, the developer would be required to commence construction of the roadway improvements off of Ashley Road and be completed by a certain date or no further building permits will be issued. • Staff would further recommend if the postponement of the Ashley Road improvements are approved that the developer would be required to post a sufficient security deposit in the form of a letter of credit, bond or cash to cover the required work. • The petitioner also sought to include the following additional language in the proposed amended annexation agreement: The City releases its review and approval rights contained in The Highlands at Ashley Pointe Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions recorded in Kendall County on May 2, 2007 as Document No. 200700014390. • Per the attached e-mail from the City Attorney’s office dated March 12, 2018, “…the City of Yorkville does not currently have review and approval rights over architectural design of the subdivision. Section 4.3.10 provides that the City must issue a building permit for out-buildings but leaves architectural decision in the hands of the Architectural Review Board (“ARB”). That said, no amendment is necessary. If an amendment were required, it would need to be done in accordance with Article 14 of the Declaration and not through the Annexation Agreement.” o Staff does not recommend this language be included in the amended agreement. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 2018 AT 7:00 P.M. AT CITY HALL UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN a public hearing shall be held on a third amendment to that certain Annexation Agreement (Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision) dated April 26, 2005, as amended October 8, 2013 and May 27, 2014, by and among Yorkville Farms Development, LLC. (Owner/Developer), an Illinois Limited Liability Corporation, and the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, on April 10, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall at the United City of Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois for the purpose of amending the requirements for the construction of an access roadway from the Yorkville Christian School site to Ashley Road. Legal Description: UNIT 1: LOTS 1 TROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 12 TROUGH 41, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 43 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 52 THROUGH 63, INCLUSIVE, LOT 65 THROUGH 108, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 357 THROUGH 363, INCLUSIVE, AND LOT 365 IN PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE UNIT 1, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTIONS 3 & 10, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 31, 2006, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 200600035287, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. UNIT 2: THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 10, 1776.14 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, 258.23 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 283.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 38 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 31.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 41 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, 269.09 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 283.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 68 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 262.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST, 0.59 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 54 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 35.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST, 70.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 265.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 14 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 0.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, 145.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST, 37.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 116.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST, 153.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, 112.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 111.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, 55.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 90.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST, 85.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST, 238.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, 13.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 288.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, 127.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 267.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 22 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 46.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, 216.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 02 SECONDS EAST, 106.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, 106.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, 86.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST, 80.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, 72.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, 71.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 54 SECONDS EAST, 71.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, 77.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 80.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, 87.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, 106.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 52.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST, 84.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, 74.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, 1006.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LANDS CONVEYED TO ROBERT M. AND ELAINE E. STEWART BY DOCUMENT NO. 72-5656; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LANDS PER DOCUMENT NO. 72-5656, 2655.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LANDS PER DOCUMENT NO. 72-5656, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, AND 1876.91 FEET SOUTHERLY OF (AS MEASURED ALONG SAID WEST LINE) THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 35 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 10, 1876.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF KENDALL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AND CONTAINING 110.29 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS. The public hearing may be continued from time to time without further notice being published. Application and information materials regarding this notice are available for public review and any questions or written comments should be addressed to the United City of Yorkville Community Development Department, City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois. All interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing and will be given an opportunity to be heard. By order of the Corporate Authorities of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. BETH WARREN City Clerk BY: Lisa Pickering Deputy Clerk Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #8 Tracking Number EDC 2018-30 Sales Tax Incentive Update Economic Development Committee - April 3, 2018 N/A See attached memo. Bart Olson Administration Name Department Summary Sales Tax Incentive update between the City and developer James Ratos. Background In June of 2002 the City entered into a Development/Economic Initiative with James Ratos, to reimburse eligible costs associated with a development located south of US Route 34 and east of Cannonball Trail. This development, commonly known as Cannonball Run Plaza, contains several sales tax generating commercial enterprises including: Jimmy Johns; Legends Sports Bar & Grill; Lakeview Grille; Joyce Lee; and Salsa Verde. Pursuant to the agreement, eligible costs for public improvements totaling $166,055 were to be reimbursed to the developer from 50% of the sales tax generated from the development, with interest accruing on the balance at a rate of 5% per year. The term of the agreement was for 15 years, which expired on October 31, 2017. The graph below illustrates total accumulated sales tax (since FY 2007) reimbursed and the total value of the incentive agreement (including accrued interest). Over the course of the 15 year incentive agreement, the development generated $493,124 in sales tax, of which $246,562 (including interest of $80,507) was reimbursed to the developer. The total value of the incentive, including accrued interest, was $249,302. The City was able to net $2,740 due to the agreement expiring before a full reimbursement could be made. Recommendation Informational item. ‐ 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 Accum Reimb Dvlp Bal 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director Date: March 22, 2018 Subject: Sales Tax Incentive Update - Ratos Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #9 Tracking Number EDC 2018-31 Ordinances Establishing Downtown TIF 2 Economic Development Committee - April 3, 2018 N/A Approval See attached memo Bart Olson Administration Name Department Majority Summary Consideration of an ordinance creating Downtown TIF 2. Background This item was last discussed at the March 27th City Council meeting, when the ordinance deleting properties from Downtown TIF 1 was approved. The next and final step in the creation of TIF 2 is the consideration of the trio of ordinances attached to this memo. The first ordinance approves the redevelopment plan as originally submitted on December 1, 2017. The second ordinance sets the boundaries of the TIF district. The third ordinance approves the tax increment financing allocation for the boundaries and the redevelopment plan (the final ordinance). Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the attached ordinances. Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: March 29, 2018 Subject: TIF 2 Ordinance Ordinance No. 2018-_____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, APPROVING THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council (collectively, the “Corporate Authorities”) of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”), have determined that the stable economic and physical development of the City is endangered by the presence of blighting factors as often manifested by progressive and advanced deterioration of structures and site improvements, inadequate utilities, lack of community planning, and by a decline in the equalized assessed value, all of which impair the value of private investment, threaten the sound growth and the tax base of the City and the taxing districts having the power to tax real property in the City (the “Taxing Districts”), and threaten the health, safety, morals, and welfare of the public; and, WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have determined that in order to promote and protect the health, safety, morals, and welfare of the public, the blighting factors in certain parts of the City need to be eradicated and redevelopment of the City be undertaken in order to remove and alleviate adverse conditions, encourage private investment, and restore and enhance the tax base of the City and the Taxing Districts; and, WHEREAS, the City has authorized an eligibility study to determine whether the proposed United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Redevelopment Project Area # 2 (the “Project Area”) qualifies as a “redevelopment project area” pursuant to the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (the “TIF Act”) 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1, et seq.; and, WHEREAS, the City has heretofore evaluated various lawfully available programs to provide assistance in order to encourage private investment and has determined that the use of tax increment allocation financing is necessary to achieve the redevelopment goals of the City for the Project Area; and, WHEREAS, the City was advised in December of 2017, that the Project Area qualifies as a “redevelopment project area” as both a “blighted” area and a “conservation” area under Section 11-74.4-3 of the TIF Act; and, WHEREAS, it is therefore concluded by the Corporate Authorities that the improved parcels of property in the Project Area qualify as a “conservation” area and the vacant parcels of property in the Project Area qualify as a “blighted” area under Section 11-74.4-3 of the TIF Act as of the date hereof; and, WHEREAS, the City has further caused the preparation of and made available for public inspection the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Redevelopment Plan (the “Plan”); and, WHEREAS, the Plan sets forth in writing the program to be undertaken to accomplish the objectives of the City and includes estimated redevelopment project costs for the Project Area, evidence indicating that the Project Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise, an assessment of the financial impact of the Project Area on and the minimal demand, if any, for services from any taxing district affected by the Plan, the sources of funds to pay costs, the nature and term of any obligations to be issued, the most recent equalized assessed valuation of the Project Area, an estimate as to the equalized assessed valuation after redevelopment, the general land uses to apply in the Project Area, and a commitment to fair employment practices and an affirmative action plan, and the Plan accordingly complies in all respects with the requirements of the TIF Act; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11-74.4-5 of the TIF Act, the Corporate Authorities by an Ordinance No. 2018-02 adopted on January 9, 2018, called a public hearing (the “Hearing”) relative to the Plan and the designation of the Project Area as a redevelopment project area under the TIF Act, and fixed the time and place for such Hearing for the 13th Day of March, 2018, at 7:00 p.m., at the United City of Yorkville, City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois; and, WHEREAS, due notice in respect to such Hearing was given pursuant to Sections 11- 74.4-5 and 11-74.4-6 of the TIF Act, said notice, together with a copy of the Plan, was sent to the Taxing Districts and to the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity of the State of Illinois by certified mail on January 24, 2018, and was published on February 16, 2018 and February 23, 2018; and, WHEREAS, the City has established and published an “interested parties registry” for the Project Area in compliance with the requirements of the TIF Act; and, WHEREAS, the City gave such notice to all persons and organizations who have registered for information with such registry, all in the manner and at the times as provided in the TIF Act; and, WHEREAS, the City gave due notice of the availability of the Plan to all residents within 750 feet of the boundaries of the Project Area, in compliance with the requirements of the TIF Act; and, WHEREAS, the City convened a Joint Review Board, as required by and in all respects in compliance with the provisions of the TIF Act; and, WHEREAS, the Joint Review Board met at the time and as required by the TIF Act, and reviewed the public record, planning documents, and a form of a proposed ordinance approving the Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Joint Review Board adopted by a majority vote an advisory, non- binding recommendation that the City proceed to implement the Plan and designate the Project Area as a redevelopment project area under the TIF Act; and, WHEREAS, the Joint Review Board based its decision on the basis of the Project Area satisfying the eligibility criteria defined in Section 11-74.4-3 of the TIF Act, and all as provided in Section 11-74.4-5(b) of the TIF Act; and, WHEREAS, the City held the Hearing on March 13th, 2018 at the United City of Yorkville, City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois at 7:00 p.m.; and, WHEREAS, at the Hearing, any interested party or affected Taxing District was permitted to file with the City Clerk written objections and was heard orally in respect to any issues embodied in the notice of said Hearing, and the City heard and determined all protests and objections at the Hearing; and WHEREAS, the Hearing was adjourned on the 13th day of March, 2018; and, WHEREAS, the Plan sets forth the factors which cause the improved parcels in the Project Area to be a conservation area and the vacant parcels to be a blighted area and the Corporate Authorities have reviewed the information concerning such factors presented at the Hearing and are generally informed of the conditions in the Project Area which could cause the Project Area to be both a “conservation” area and a “blighted” area as defined in the TIF Act; and, WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have reviewed evidence indicating that the Project Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise, and have reviewed the conditions pertaining to lack of private investment in the Project Area to determine whether private development would take place in the Project Area as a whole without the adoption of the proposed Plan and assistance as authorized by the TIF Act; and, WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have reviewed the conditions pertaining to real property in the Project Area to determine whether contiguous parcels of real property and improvements thereon in the Project Area would be substantially benefited by the proposed project improvements; and, WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have made an assessment of any financial impact of the Project Area on or the minimal demand, if any, for services from any Taxing District affected by the Plan and found that the redevelopment projects proposed by the Plan will not cause any significant financial impact or increased demand for facilities or services by any local taxing body; and, WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have reviewed the proposed Plan and the existing comprehensive plan of the City for development as a whole and finds that the proposed Plan conforms to the comprehensive plan of the City. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1: Findings. The Corporate Authorities hereby make the following findings: (a) The Project Area is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set out in full by this reference. The map of the Project Area showing the street location is depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set out in full by this reference. (b) There exist conditions which cause the Project Area to be subject to designation as a redevelopment project area under the TIF Act and for each improved parcel to be classified as a conservation area and each vacant parcel to be classified as a blighted area, as defined in Section 11- 74.4-3 of the TIF Act. (c) The Project Area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise and would not be reasonably anticipated to be developed without the adoption of the Plan. (d) The Plan conforms to the comprehensive plan for the development of the City as a whole. (e) As set forth in the Plan and in the testimony at the public hearing, the estimated date of completion of the Plan is December 31 of the year in which the payment to the municipal treasurer, as provided in subsection (b) of Section 11-74.4-8 of the TIF Act, is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the 23rd calendar year after the year in which the ordinance approving the Project Area as a redevelopment project area under the TIF Act was adopted. (f) The parcels of real property in the Project Area are contiguous, and only those contiguous parcels of real property and improvements thereon which will be substantially benefited by the proposed project improvements are included in the Project Area. Section 2: Exhibits Incorporated by Reference. The Plan entitled, United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Redevelopment Plan, which was the subject matter of the public hearing held on the 13th day of March, 2018, is hereby adopted and approved. A copy of the Plan, which incorporates the eligibility findings is attached hereto as Exhibit C and is incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3: Invalidity of Any Section. If any section, paragraph, or provision of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. Section 4: Superseder and Effective Date. All ordinances, resolutions, motions, or orders in conflict with this Ordinance are repealed to the extent of such conflict, and this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage by the Corporate Authorities and approval as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this _________ day of _________________, 2018. ______________________________ CITY CLERK CARLO COLOSIMO ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ ARDEN JOE PLOCHER ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ SEAVER TARULIS ________ ALEX HERNANDEZ ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this _________ day of _________________, 2018. ______________________________ MAYOR Attest: ___________________________________ CITY CLERK Exhibit A Legal Description United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF SECTIONS 32 AND 33, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 83 IN KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF DYDYNA COURT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF BENJAMIN STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 5 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5 TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 86 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 86 TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 12 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12 TO THE WEST LINE OF TOMASIK COURT; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY MOST CORNER OF LOT 17 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 27 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 27 TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BENJAMIN STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BENJAMIN STREET TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 29 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 29 TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 84 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 84 TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 84; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF THE COMMONWEALTH EDISON RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF VAN EMMON STREET ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID VAN EMMON STREET ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID VAN EMMON STREET ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND SAID WEST LINE EXTENDED NORTH, TO THE NORTH LINE OF VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID VAN EMMON STREET TO THE WEST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED JULY 3, 1990, AS DOCUMENT 904281; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 12 IN SECTION 33, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED ON PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 96; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ILLINOIS RAILNET RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-156-016; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF SAID EAST LINE AND THE EAST LINES OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHERLY MOST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-156-017; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL AND SAID WEST LINE EXTENDED TO THE NORTH LINE OF HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET AND THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 4 IN TER-JAC SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN SAID TER-JAC SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 6 FEET OF LOT I IN SAID TER-JAC SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF HEUSTIS STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF EAST VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN TRUSTEE’S DEED DATED JANUARY 23, 2002 AND RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 200200002291; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF HEUSTIS STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE, EXTENDED NORTH, OF THE 20’ ALLEY RUNNING THROUGH BLOCK SIX OF BLACKS ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE EXTENDED NORTH AND SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN THE OLD SECOND NATIONAL BANK BRIDGE STREET SUBDIVISION; THENCE FOLLOWING A CLOCKWISE DIRECTION AROUND THE PERIMETER OF SAID LOT 2 TO THE EAST LINE OF ROUTE 47; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO A BEND POINT IN SAID SOUTH LINE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG A WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BELL STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF BELL STREET AND THE WEST LINE OF BELL STREET EXTENDED SOUTH TO THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST FOX STREET; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE, TO THE WEST LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL TWO, DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 25, 2003 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 200300025623; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID SOUTH LINE AND ON THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 1, 2010 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 201000002076 TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 11 IN THE ORIGINAL VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE AND ON THE WEST LINE OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 11 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN SAID BLOCK 11; THENCE EASTERLY, ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE WEST LINE OF AFORESAID PARCEL TWO, DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 25, 2003 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 200300025623; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST FOX STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 14 IN THE ORIGINAL VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE; THENCE EASTERLY, ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7, 30 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7 AND ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 6 IN SAID BLOCK 14 TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL WITH A PIN OF 02-32-429-002 AND OWNED BY THE COUNTY OF KENDALL; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VACATED RIDGE STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID VACATED RIDGE STREET TO THE EAST LINE OF VACATED JEFFERSON STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1995 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 9506986; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE, SAID LINE BEING THE CENTERLINE OF VACATED MADISON STREET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL, BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL, BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE, TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID WEST LINE TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 28 IN SAID ORIGINAL VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 5 AND 6 IN SAID BLOCK 28, 125 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 3 IN SAID BLOCK; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID EAST LINE AND ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 4, 100 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 5 AND 6 IN SAID BLOCK 28 TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 1 IN BLACKS ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 6, 12, 11 AND 10 IN SAID BLOCK 1 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 10; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID SOUTH LINE AND ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 2 IN SAID BLOCK 1 TO THE WEST LINE OF ROUTE 47; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF WEST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF MORGAN STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION TO THE NORTH LINE OF WEST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF MORGAN STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID MORGAN STREET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF VACATED VAN EMMON STREET. THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 24 IN BLACKS SECOND ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 143 FEET OF LOTS 3 AND 4 IN SAID BLOCK 24; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE AND ON THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF SAID WEST LINE, TO THE NORTH LINE OF WEST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE, TO THE EAST LINE OF WHITE OAK FARM UNIT 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID EAST LINE, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL TWO, DESCRIBED IN TRUSTEES DEED RECORDED MARCH 5, 2004 AS DOCUMENT 200400005336; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF PARCEL 3, DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED, RECORDED OCTOBER 11, 2012 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 201200019862; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE, 100 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF MADISON STREET; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK 23 IN BLACKS SECOND ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF VACATED MADISON STREET; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 21 IN SAID BLACKS SECOND ADDITION; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST MADISON STREET; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTH MAIN STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST WASHINGTON STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST WASHINGTON STREET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 10 FEET OF LOT 10 IN BLOCK 5 OF MASON’S ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF YORKVILLE, EXTENDED SOUTH; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE EXTENDED AND SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK 5; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND THE SOUTH LINES OF LOTS 2, 3 AND 4 IN SAID BLOCK 5 TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND SAID EAST LINE EXTENDED NORTH TO THE NORTH LINE OF EAST FOX STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-301-011; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND THE EAST LINE OF THE FOLLOWING 2 P.I.N.’S 02-33-301-008 AND 02-33-301-013 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN THE OLD SECOND NATIONAL BANK BRIDGE STREET SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-301-004; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND SAID SOUTH LINE EXTENDED EAST, TO THE EAST LINE OF HEUSTIS STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-304-005; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-304-014; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET; THENCE EASTERLY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILL STREET AND EAST RIDGE STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF MILL STREET TO THE NORTH LINE OF PRICE’S FIRST ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PRICE’S FIRST ADDITION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO AN OLD CLAIM LINE DESCRIBED IN QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED JULY 6, 1988 AS DOCUMENT 883256; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID OLD CLAIM LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE COMMONWEALTH EDISON RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Exhibit B United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Boundary Map Mill StB e n j a m i n S t W Fox St State StDeer StHeustis StE Fox St E Van Emmon St Beaver St W Ridge St Morgan StE Orange St Adrian StW Madison St Blaine St Elizabeth St Colonial Pkwy W River St Badger StE Washington St Garden St Illini Dr Wolf St Crooked Creek DrAdams StGawne Ln W Van Emmon St W Orange St Wooden Bridge DrWalsh DrOlsen St Walter St E Barberry CirE Hydraulic Ave Wood Sage AveE Ridge St Worsley StDydyna CtW Hydraulic Ave Garden CirW Dolph St Bator StCornersto n e D r W Was hi n gt o n St W Beecher St Rodak St Buhrma st er Ct Illini CtState StMorgan StW Hydraulic Ave S Main StW Dolph St W Washington St S Bridge StS Bridge StSc h o o l h o u s e R d Sc h o o l h o u s e R d 47 126 Fox River LEGEND Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Boundary Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Parcels N All map data provided by the City of Yorkville Community Development Department. October 2017. LEGEND Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #1 Boundary Parcels Added From Project Area #1 into Project Area #2 N All map data provided by the City of Yorkville Community Development Department. October 2017. Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Boundary Remaining Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #1 Parcels Additional Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Parcels Exhibit C United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Redevelopment Plan Prepared by: Kathleen Field Orr Kathleen Field Orr & Associates 53 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 964 Chicago, Illinois 60604 312.382.2113 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 Mill StB e n j a m i n S t W Fox St State StDeer StHeustis StE Fox St E Van Emmon St Beaver St W Ridge St Morgan StE Orange St Adrian StW Madison St Blaine St Elizabeth St Colonial Pkwy W River St Badger StE Washington St Garden St Illini Dr Wolf St Crooked Creek DrAdams StGawne L n W Van Emmon St W Orange St Wooden Bridge DrWalsh DrOlsen St Walter St E Barberry CirE Hydraulic Ave Wood Sage AveE Ridge St Worsley StDydyna CtW Hydraulic Ave Garden CirW Dolph St Bator StCornerst o n e D r W Was hi n gt o n St W Beecher St Rodak St Buhrma st er Ct Illini CtState StMorgan StW Hydraulic Ave S Main StW Dolph St W Washington St S Bridge StS Bridge StSc h o o l h o u s e R d Sc h o o l h o u s e R d 47 126 Fox River LEGEND Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Boundary Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Parcels N All map data provided by the City of Yorkville Community Development Department. October 2017. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 1 In February 1977, the Illinois General Assembly passed the initial version of what is now the present Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (the “Act”) (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seq.). This 1977 legislation was the initial authorization for the use of tax increment financing (“TIF”) in Illinois. The Act provides a means for municipalities, after the approval of a Redevelopment Plan, designation of a Redevelopment Project Area and adoption of tax increment allocation financing, to redevelop blighted, conservation, or industrial park conservation redevelopment project areas and to finance “redevelopment project costs” (“Redevelopment Project Costs”) with “incremental property tax revenues” (“Incremental Property Taxes”). Incremental Property Taxes are derived from the increase in the equalized assessed valuation (“EAV”) of taxable real property within the Redevelopment Project Area over and above the equalized assessed value of such property from the time tax increment allocation financing is adopted (“Initial EAV”). Any year-to-year increase in EAV over the Initial EAV of such property is then multiplied by the current tax rate, which results in Incremental Property Taxes. The Act defines a number of eligible items that qualify as Redevelopment Project Costs. Incremental Property Taxes may pay for eligible Redevelopment Project Costs or may be pledged, notes or other obligations issued for that purpose. In addition, a municipality may pledge, as payment, additional revenues including revenues from the Redevelopment Project, municipal property taxes or other revenue sources, and may issue bonds backed by the general obligation of the municipality or payable solely from Incremental Property Taxes and other sources. As stated above, as a result of the adoption of TIF, Incremental Property Taxes are captured as new tax revenues generated by the increase of the EAV over the Initial EAV. This increased EAV of properties can result from a municipality’s redevelopment program, improvements, various developments and redevelopment activities, and the reassessment of properties. Under the Act, all taxing districts continue to receive property taxes levied by application of their tax rates on the Initial EAV of properties within the Redevelopment Project Area. Taxing districts benefit from the increased property tax base after Redevelopment Project Costs and obligations have been paid and the designation of the redevelopment project is terminated. If the taxing districts have building and structures in the Redevelopment Project Area, those facilities are eligible for repair, remodeling and rehabilitation to the extent funds are available. Any capitalized term not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning ascribed to such term by the Act. I. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 2 II. THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE The United City of Yorkville (the “City”) is located approximately 50 miles southwest of Chicago within Kendall County’s Fox River Valley as the Fox River runs directly through the City. The City is generally bounded by the Villages of Montgomery and Sugar Grove to the north; the Village of Oswego the east; the City of Plano to the west; and, the City of Morris to the south. The town of Yorkville was originally settled in 1832 as an agricultural business center with a downtown district south of the Fox River on Bridge Street. Although the City started as a small town, growth has been a hallmark of the community since its inception as illustrated by Yorkville’s designation as the County Seat in 1859; the establishment of the Chicago Burlington and Quincy railroad route through Yorkville in 1870; and, Yorkville’s incorporation in 1887. Yorkville grew even further when in 1957, based on shared circumstances, the then town of Yorkville and its neighbor to the north of the Fox River, the town of Bristol, combined to form what we know today as the “United City of Yorkville”. Between 1960 and the census of 2000, the City’s population grew to 6,189. In the following 10 years, the population grew by over 10,000 people to 16,921 per the 2010 census. Due to the swelling population, the City is currently in the process of conducting a special census as it estimates its current population at 18,500 people. The City continues to annex hundreds of acres; develop residential subdivisions, commercial corridors and an industrial park; and, has begun to attract tourists with the recreational amenities provided by the Fox River and the opening of the Marge Cline Whitewater Course at the Glen D. Palmer Dam located at the City’s Bicentennial Riverfront Park. Despite the aforementioned population increase and the substantial residential and commercial development in recent years, little has been done to the area comprising the City’s “downtown district” to keep up with the changing times. Many of the buildings therein suffer from deterioration as a result of aging such as defects in doors, windows, porches, gutters, downspouts and fascia. As the oldest part of the City, the area is also serviced by outdated utilities that are insufficient to keep up with the growing population. In addition, because of its age, the area was developed at a time when a comprehensive plan did not exist for the City, resulting in a poor street design that impedes the overall flow and plan of the City. Finally, and most distressing, is the rampant decline in the assessed values of properties within the area. As regional growth of the Chicago metropolitan area proceeds southwestward, the City has focused its planning efforts on guiding development to assure a compatible balance of land uses reflective of the City’s small town heritage but also responsive to its continuing population growth and contemporary development opportunities. Implementation of the Act shall permit the City to provide incentives to attract developers, who have been unwilling to undertake development to date because of the factors detailed above, which development would eradicate those same detrimental factors and bring the City’s downtown district in line with the Comprehensive Plan which the City adopted in 2016. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 3 III. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA The proposed “United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2”, as legally described on Exhibit A hereto and depicted by the map attached hereto as Exhibit B (the “Redevelopment Project Area”), encompasses some of the oldest structures in the United City of Yorkville dating from the late 1800’s and early 1900’s including the Kendall County Courthouse originally built in 1864. This Downtown district is a mixed-use area with a range of commercial and retail uses, restaurants, residential uses, public and civic uses with a few industrial uses remaining from the dependence on the Fox River and freight rail line in the past. In the early 1970’s however, commercial development occurred at the intersecting corridors of US Route 34 and Il Route 47 which included a strip retail center, big box uses and businesses. This new auto-oriented commercial area significantly imported the Downtown district and new private investment in the Downtown diminished. The current land uses within the Project Area are detailed on the map attached hereto as Exhibit C. In 2000, the City began to address the changing opportunities for redevelopment of the Downtown and in 2005, adopted the “United City of Yorkville Downtown Vision Plan” which set forth recommendations for development and redevelopment in this area. As a part of its strategy, in 2006, the City designated the area as a “redevelopment project area” under the Act in order to revitalize the Downtown and stimulate new development, redevelopment and rehabilitation in the Downtown. The best efforts on the part of the City’s capable staff were thwarted by the country’s economic decline occurring shortly after the adoption of the TIF Act. The opportunities for growth and redevelopment were seriously limited for some period of time. Since the date of the adoption of the Act in 2006, as applicable to the Downtown, the equalized assessed value of all properties included in this redevelopment project area increased from $5,745,902 to $5,865,094 a total increase of approximately two percent (2%) in ten (10) years. The City has come to the realization that it must give more attention to the Downtown in order to retain its colorful history while providing the infrastructure and amenities needed. The construction of the Marge Cline Whitewater Course at Bicentennial Riverfront Park in 2010 was expected to create new interest in the Downtown district, however, minimal redevelopment has occurred. This Redevelopment Plan provides an updated coordinated plan for sixty (60) parcels of property included in the 2006 Downtown Redevelopment Project Area, and the addition of adjacent parcels in order to address the recommendations provided by the City’s 2016 Comprehensive Plan and the improvements of the river front. The Project Area is positioned around the Route 47 and Van Emmon Street intersection and its general boundary contains a majority of the parcels both north and south of Van Emmon Street from 5 blocks West of Route 47 to 3 blocks east of Route 47, as well as parcels on the east side of Main Street from Madison Street to Washington Street, parcels on the west side of Mill St from Van Emmon Street to Ridge Street, parcels on the east side of Heustis Street from Van Emmon Street to Fox Street, and parcels on the east side of Route 47 from Washington Street to Van Emmon Street. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 4 IV. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ADDRESS EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Upon the designation of the Redevelopment Project Area as a “redevelopment project area” under the Act, the City intends to use tax increment financing to pay Redevelopment Project Costs and to stimulate private investment for development and redevelopment thereby eliminating those conditions, the existence of which qualified both the improved area and vacant area of the proposed Redevelopment Project Area. Under the Act, the purpose for preparation of a Redevelopment Plan is to set forth a guide to be undertaken for activities with a goal toward stimulating comprehensive and coordinated redevelopment in order to induce private investment. As required by the Act, each Redevelopment Plan must include the program to be undertaken by the municipality in order to complete its objectives and must set forth the following: 1. an itemized list of estimated redevelopment project costs; 2. evidence indicating that the redevelopment project area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise; 3. an assessment of any financial impact of the redevelopment project area on or any increased demand for services from any taxing district affected by the plan and a program to address such financial impact or increased demand; 4. the sources of funds to pay development or redevelopment costs; 5. the nature and term of the obligations to be issued, if any; 6. the most recent equalized assessed valuation of the proposed Redevelopment Project Area; 7. an estimate as to the equalized assessed valuation after redevelopment and the general land uses to apply in the proposed Redevelopment Project Area; 8. a commitment to fair employment practices and an affirmative action plan; 9. if it concerns an industrial park conservation area, the plan shall also include a general description of any proposed developer, user and tenant of any property; a description of the type, structure and general character of the facilities to be developed, a description of the type, class and number of new employees to be employed in the operation of the facilities to be developed; and, 10. if property is to be annexed to the municipality, the plan shall include the terms of the annexation agreement. B. The Act prohibits the adoption of a Redevelopment Plan unless the municipality complies with the following: 1. The municipality finds that the proposed redevelopment project area on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by private enterprise and would not reasonably be anticipated to be developed without the adoption of the redevelopment plan. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 5 2. The municipality finds that the redevelopment plan and project conform to the comprehensive plan for the development of the municipality as a whole, or, for municipalities with a population of 100,000 or more, regardless of when the redevelopment plan and project was adopted, the redevelopment plan and project either: (i) conforms to the strategic economic development or redevelopment plan issued by the designated planning authority of the municipality, or (ii) includes land uses that have been approved by the planning commission of the municipality. 3. The redevelopment plan establishes the estimated dates of completion of the redevelopment project and retirement of obligations issued which may be issued to finance redevelopment project costs. Those dates may not be later than the dates set forth under Section 11-74.4- 3(n)(j)(3); i.e., not later than December 31 of the year in which the payment to the municipal treasurer of Incremental Property Taxes is to be made with respect to real estate taxes levied in the twenty-third year after the year in which the ordinance approving the Redevelopment Project Area is adopted. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 6 V. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA GOALS AND OBJECTIVES A. Redevelopment Project Area Goals In order to benefit from the Act and achieve new private investment within the proposed Redevelopment Project Area, the City must establish a framework for guiding decisions to be made as a part of the implementation of this Redevelopment Plan. These include: 1. Preservation of the history of the City through retention of historic structures. 2. Creation of an environment within the Redevelopment Project Area that will contribute more positively to the health, safety and general welfare of the City and preserve or enhance the value of properties in and adjacent to the Redevelopment Project Area. 3. An increase in the sales tax base of the City and the property tax base of overlapping taxing districts. 4. Addition of new amenities, businesses and services to the City thereby creating new jobs and retaining existing jobs for City and area residents. 5. Strengthening the economy and future economic viability of the Downtown and the larger community. 6. Stabilizing a revitalized downtown business district. 7. Rehabilitation and renovation of structures within the Redevelopment Project Area to address the current market place requirements. 8. Sound economic development within the Redevelopment Project Area that is consistent with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan for the development of the Downtown and the City as a whole. B. Redevelopment Objectives The designation of the Redevelopment Project Area as a “redevelopment project area” under the Act shall grant the City the power to: 1. Reduce or eliminate those conditions that qualified the Redevelopment Project Area as a “conservation area”. Reduce or eliminate those blighting conditions in the improved “conservation area” which qualified said area as a Redevelopment Project Area. Such conditions include deterioration, inadequate utilities, lack of community planning and a declining equalized assessed value as defined by the Act, as more fully described in the Eligibility Study in order to encourage the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Project Area. 2. Encourage preservation of the historic appearance of buildings, rights-of-way, and open spaces and encourage the development and improved standards of design. 3. Strengthen the economic vitality of the Redevelopment Project Area by increasing business activity, improving the tax base, and providing job opportunities. 4. Stimulate through incentives, if necessary, new private investment in improvements and redevelopment within the Redevelopment Project Area. 5. Provide needed public improvements to the infrastructure or facilities in proper relationship to the projected demand for such facilities and in accordance with present-day standards DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 7 for such facilities. Infrastructure improvements should address the problems cited in the Eligibility Study in order to encourage redevelopment of the Redevelopment Project Area. 6. Provide needed financial assistance, if necessary, to induce a broad range of improvements. 7. Provide the renovation and rehabilitation of structures where economic obsolescence is a material impediment to the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Project Area. 8. Address the deteriorating street pavement, sidewalks, parking areas, driveways and curbs. 9. Improve the visual attractiveness of the City through landscaping and coordination of design in the Redevelopment Project Area. 10. Improve opportunities for commercial, office and mixed-use development and redevelopment. C. Redevelopment Implementation Strategy The implementation and conclusion of a well-devised redevelopment strategy is a key element in the success of this Redevelopment Plan. In order to maximize program efficiency and to take advantage of redevelopment interest in the Redevelopment Project Area, and with full consideration of available funds, the City intends to proceed in an expeditious manner. A combination of public and private investments is an essential element of this Redevelopment Plan. In order to achieve the foregoing investments and improvements, the City may enter into agreements, including agreements with private developers, proposing that assistance may be provided pursuant to the Act, where deemed appropriate, to facilitate private projects and development. The City may also contract with other entities, including governmental units, to accomplish certain public and private projects as contained in this Redevelopment Plan. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 8 VI. LACK OF DEVELOPMENT, GROWTH AND FISCAL IMPACT ON TAXING DISTRICTS A. Evidence of the lack of development and growth within the Redevelopment Project Area As documented in the Eligibility Study, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit D, the Redevelopment Project Area has suffered from a lack of growth and development through investment by private enterprise and qualifies as a “conservation area”. Absent financial assistance from the City, development or redevelopment in the Redevelopment Project Area is not reasonably anticipated to occur. The Redevelopment Project Area’s blighting conditions, as documented in the Eligibility Study, are reasonably present to a meaningful extent, are reasonably distributed throughout the Redevelopment Project Area, and will continue to worsen if not addressed by the City. In addition, these conditions discourage private sector investment whether in development of residential opportunities or commercial enterprises or in the redevelopment of existing facilities. Accordingly, the City finds that actions taken, at least in part, through the implementation of this Redevelopment Plan will significantly mitigate such problems. B. Assessment of Fiscal Impact on Affected Taxing Districts It is not anticipated that redevelopment projects implemented as part of this Redevelopment Plan will have a negative financial impact on or cause increased demand for services or capital improvements from any taxing district affected by the Redevelopment Plan. No current property taxes will be diverted from any taxing district. Instead, taxing districts could benefit from distributions of any surplus tax increment. Capital funds will also be available to assist in the development of public improvements. The Redevelopment Project Costs set forth in Section VIII of this Redevelopment Plan provide for significant amounts to pay taxing district capital costs in accordance with the Act should impacts be greater than expected. The following is an assessment of the impact on each individual taxing district: Kendall County There is expected to be no impact and no expected increase in demand for services or negative financial impact. Waubonsee Community College District #516 There is expected to be no impact and no expected increase in demand for services. Funds are also available for job training. United City of Yorkville There is expected to be minimal impact and minimal expected increase in demand for services. Funds are available for capital projects undertaken by the City within the Redevelopment Project Area. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 9 Yorkville Unit School District 115 Residential development may be a component of the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area. In the event the net amount of students from development undertaken in the Redevelopment Project Area increases as a result of the TIF assistance to the development of housing units, funds have been allocated in the budget for estimated Redevelopment Project Costs hereinafter set forth for reimbursement pursuant to the Act. In addition, funds are available for capital costs which may be incurred by the district as a result of activities in the Redevelopment Project Area. Kendall Township There is expected to be no impact and no expected increase in demand for services or negative financial impact. Bristol Township There is expected to be no impact and no expected increase in demand for services or negative financial impact. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 10 VII. REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES Pursuant to the goals and objectives as stated in Article V, the City will implement a coordinated program of action. The City may use any program element authorized by the Act including, but not limited to, those listed below. The City proposes to achieve the redevelopment goals and objectives of this Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area through the use of “incremental property taxes” available to it pursuant to the Act and through public financing techniques including, but not limited to, tax increment financing and by utilizing such other financing techniques deemed necessary to undertake some or all of the following activities and improvements: 1. Analysis, Administration, Studies, Surveys, Legal, etc. The City may undertake or engage professional consultants, engineers, architects, attorneys, etc. to conduct various analyses, design façade improvements, study alternative potential uses, survey current needs for the City, provide legal services to establish, implement and administer the Redevelopment Plan. 2. Property Assembly The City, or an agent for the City, may acquire and assemble land for the purpose of development or redevelopment. Underutilized or misused property may be acquired by purchase, exchange, or long-term lease by private developers or the City for the purpose of new development or redevelopment. 3. Land Preparation The City may assist in the preparation of land to include demolition, environmental remediation, and flood mitigation. 4. Rehabilitation and Lease Hold Improvements The City may assist in rehabilitation, remodel, repair, and lease hold improvements. 5. Land Acquisition The City may purchase land within the proposed Redevelopment Project Area. 6. Development or Redevelopment Agreements The City may enter into development and redevelopment agreements with private or public entities in the furtherance of this Redevelopment Plan. Such agreements may be for the assemblage of land, construction of improvements or facilities, improvement of access, the provision of services, reimbursement of eligible redevelopment project costs under the Act or any other lawful purpose. Agreements may contain terms and provisions that are more specific than the controls that are summarized in this Redevelopment Plan. In the case where a private individual or entity received benefits under the Act for the purpose of originating, locating, maintaining, rehabbing, or expanding a business facility and abandons or relocates its facility in violation of a redevelopment agreement, the City reserves the right to collect reimbursement for funds extended in accordance with the Act. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 11 7. Provision of Public Works or Improvements The City may provide public works and improvements that are necessary to service the Redevelopment Project Area in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. Public works and improvements may include, but are not limited to, the following: Streets, Sidewalks, Lighting, Utilities, and Parking Public infrastructure improvements may be necessary to adequately serve the Redevelopment Project Area and potential new development. Improved access will be necessary to develop portions of the Redevelopment Project Area. Certain infrastructure improvements, in connection with and adjacent to the Redevelopment Project Area, may be necessary to advance the goals and objectives of this Redevelopment Plan. It is expected that streets, sidewalks, utilities (including any electrical or data upgrades needed to accommodate current technology), and parking improvements will be part of any redevelopment activity. Landscaping Landscape/buffer improvements, street lighting and general beautification improvements may be provided. Sanitary Sewer System Improvements and rehabilitation of sanitary sewer mains to eliminate sewer backup including the relining of existing sewer mains and replacement of manholes. In addition, improvements to the City’s wastewater treatment system must be made, including the construction of a new waste water treatment plant. Stormwater Management Analysis of the existing stormwater management structure and improvements as may needed to be created to reduce stormwater runoff. Coordinate Design for Improvement within the Redevelopment Project Area Where possible, design elements should be planned in such a way as to make the Redevelopment Project Area aesthetically pleasing. Consistent and coordinated design patterns should be promoted. Job Training The City may assist facilities and enterprises located within the Redevelopment Project Area in obtaining job training assistance. Job training and retraining programs currently available from or through other governments include, but are not limited to: • Federal programs; • State of Illinois programs; • Applicable local vocational educational programs, including community college sponsored programs; and, • Other federal, state, county, or non-profit programs that are currently available or will be developed and initiated over time. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 12 Interest Subsidy Funds may be provided to reimburse redevelopers for a portion of interest costs related to the construction of qualifying redevelopment facilities and improvements. Assist in Financing Redevelopment Project Area Contiguous TIFs Funds derived from either this Redevelopment Project Area or others that may be contiguous are eligible to be used for the support of the other redevelopment programs under this Redevelopment Plan. The Project Area’s proposed land uses will be as detailed on the map attached hereto as Exhibit E. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 13 VIII. ESTIMATED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COSTS The Act defines Redevelopment Project Costs as the sum total of all reasonable or necessary costs in- curred or estimated to be incurred, and any such costs incidental to the Redevelopment Plan and its implementation through development and redevelopment projects. All costs to be paid or reimbursed in the Redevelopment Project Area will conform to this definition. A wide range of redevelopment activities and improvements will be required to implement the Rede- velopment Plan. The activities and improvements and their estimated costs (2017 dollars) are sum- marized below. To the extent that obligations are issued to pay for such Redevelopment Project Costs prior to, and in anticipation of, the adoption of TIF and designation of the Redevelopment Project Area, the City may directly pay or be reimbursed from Incremental Property Taxes for such Redevelopment Project Costs to their fullest extent. These costs are in addition to total Redevelopment Project Costs. The total Redevelopment Project Costs set forth below are an upper estimate of expenditures and do not commit the City to undertake any particular Redevelopment Project Costs. While all of the costs in the budget below are eligible Redevelopment Project Costs under the Act and this Redevelopment Plan, inclusion herein does not commit the City to finance all of these costs with TIF funds. A. Total Redevelopment Project Budget DESCRIPTION COST Costs of studies, surveys, development of plans and specifications, implementation and ad- ministration (annual administrative costs shall not include general overhead or administra- tive costs of the municipality that would still have been incurred by the municipality if the municipality had not designated a Redevelopment Project Area or approved a Redevelop- ment Plan) of the Redevelopment Plan including, but not limited to, staff and professional service costs for architectural, engineering, legal, financial, planning or other services, as provided for by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(1-1.5). $200,000 Costs of marketing sites within the Redevelopment Project Area to prospective businesses, developers, and investors, as provided for by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(1.6). $50,000 Property assembly costs, including, but not limited to, acquisition of land and other prop- erty, real or personal, or rights or interests herein, demolition of buildings, site preparation, site improvements that serve as an engineered barrier addressing ground level or below ground environmental contamination, including, but not limited to, parking lots and other concrete or asphalt barriers, and the clearing and grading of land, as provided for by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(2). $4,000,000 Costs of rehabilitation, reconstruction or repair or remodeling of existing public or private buildings, fixtures, and leasehold improvements; and the cost of replacing an existing pub- lic building if pursuant to the implementation of a redevelopment project, the existing public building is to be demolished to use the site for private investment or devoted to a different use requiring private investment; including any direct or indirect costs relating to Green Globes or LEED certified construction elements or construction elements with an equivalent certification, as provided for by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(3). $2,000,000 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 14 Costs of the construction of public works or improvements, including any direct or indirect costs relating to Green Globes or LEED certified construction elements or construction ele - ments with an equivalent certification, as provided for by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(4). $3,000,000 Costs of job training and retraining projects, including the cost of “welfare to work” pro- grams implemented by businesses located within the Redevelopment Project Area, as pro- vided for by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(5). $ 150,000 Financing costs, including, but not limited to, all necessary and incidental expenses related to the issuance of obligations and which may include payment of interest on any obliga- tions including interest accruing during the estimated period of construction of the Rede- velopment Project for which such obligations are issued and for not exceeding 36 months thereafter and including reasonable reserves related thereto, as provided for by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(6). $2,000,000 To the extent the City, by written agreement, accepts and approves the same, all or a por- tion of a taxing district’s capital costs resulting from the Redevelopment Project necessarily incurred or to be incurred within a taxing district in furtherance of the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan (impacts such as those on the City may be addressed through these funds), as provided for by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(7). $ 300,000 Relocation costs to the extent that a municipality determines that relocation costs shall be paid or the municipality is required to make payment of relocation costs by federal or State law or in order to satisfy subparagraph (7) of subsection (n) of Section 11-74.4-3 of the Act, as provided for by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(8). $ 100,000 Payment in lieu of taxes, as provided by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(9). $ 500,000 Cost of job training, retraining, advanced vocational education or career education, includ- ing but not limited to courses in occupational, semi-technical or technical fields leading di- rectly to employment, incurred by one or more taxing districts, provided that such costs (i) are related to the establishment and maintenance of additional job training, advanced vo- cational education or career education programs for persons employed or to be employed by employers located in a Redevelopment Project Area; and (ii) when incurred by a taxing district or taxing districts other than the municipality, are set forth in a written agreement by or among the municipality and the taxing district or taxing districts, which agreement describes the program to be undertaken, including, but not limited to, the number of em- ployees to be trained, a description of the training and services to be provided, the num- ber and type of positions available or to be available, itemized costs of the program and sources of funds to pay for the same, and the term of the agreement. Such costs include, specifically, the payment by community college districts of costs pursuant to Sections 3-37, 3-38, 3-40 and 3-40.1 of the Public Community College Act and by school districts of costs pursuant to Sections 10-22.20a and 10-23.3a of the School Code, as provided for by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(10). $150,000 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 15 Interest cost incurred by a redeveloper related to the construction, renovation or rehabilita- tion of a redevelopment project, as provided for by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(11). $500,000 Contributions of incremental revenues transferred to contiguous redevelopment project areas, as provided for by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-4(q). $1,000,000 Total Estimated Costs $13,950,000 Notes regarding Redevelopment Project Costs: 1. All costs are in 2017 dollars and may be increased annually after adjusting for annual inflation reflected in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers in U.S. Cities, published by the U.S. Department of Labor, as allowed by the Act. 2. Private redevelopment costs and investment are in addition to the above. 3. To the extent permitted by law, the City reserves the right to adjust and transfer budgeted amounts within the Total Estimated Costs within the Total Redevelopment Project Budget among the categories of eligible Redevelopment Project Costs set forth therein, provided any such adjustment or transfer shall not increase the Total Redevelopment Project Budget, other than as otherwise provided in a. above. 4. Certain infrastructure work in connection with and appurtenant to the Redevelopment Project Area can be undertaken under the Act. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 16 IX. MOST RECENT EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA The most recent equalized assessed valuation for the Redevelopment Project Area is based on 2016 and is $4,487,777.00. X. ANTICIPATED EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUATION FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Upon completion of the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Project Area over a twenty-three (23) year period, it is estimated that the EAV of the property within the Redevelopment Project Area would increase to between approximately $15,000,000 to $18,000,000 depending upon market conditions and the scope of the redevelopment projects. XI. COMMITMENT TO FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES AND AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN The City is committed to and will affirmatively implement the assurance of equal opportunity in all personnel and employment actions with respect to this Redevelopment Plan. This includes, but is not limited to: hiring, training, transfer, promotion, discipline, fringe benefits, salary, employment working conditions, termination, etc. without regard to any non-merit factor, including race, national origin, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability (physical or mental), age, marital status, status as a parent, or genetic information. In order to implement this principle for this Redevelopment Plan, the City shall require and promote equal employment practices and affirmative action on the part of itself and its contractors and vendors. In particular, parties engaged by the City shall be required to agree to the principles set forth in this section. XII. COMPLETION OF REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND RETIREMENT OF OBLIGATIONS ISSUED TO FINANCE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT COSTS The Redevelopment Project is to be completed and all obligations issued to finance Redevelopment Project Costs are to be retired upon receipt of the incremental property taxes generated from the twenty-third (23rd) year after the adoption of an ordinance designating the Redevelopment Project Area. The actual date for such completion and retirement of obligations shall not be later than Decem- ber 31 of the year in which the payment to the City treasurer pursuant to the Act is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third calendar year after the year in which the ordi- nance approving the Redevelopment Project Area was adopted. This Redevelopment Plan may be amended pursuant to the provisions of the Act. XIII. PROVISIONS FOR AMENDING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PROJECT DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 17 Exhibit A Legal Description of the Redevelopment Project Area Exhibit B Map of Redevelopment Project Area Exhibit C Redevelopment Project Area Current Land Use Map Exhibit D Redevelopment Project Area Future Land Use Map Exhibit E Eligibility Report of Downtown TIF #2 United City of Yorkville, Illinois Exhibit F Housing Study of Downtown TIF #2 United City of Yorkville, Illinois EXHIBITS DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 18 EXHIBIT A: LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF SECTIONS 32 AND 33, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 83 IN KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID KEND- ALLWOOD ESTATES TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF DYDYNA COURT; THENCE WEST- ERLY ALONG THE SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF BENJAMIN STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 5 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5 TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 86 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 86 TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 12 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12 TO THE WEST LINE OF TOMASIK COURT; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY MOST CORNER OF LOT 17 IN SAID KENDALL- WOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 TO THE SOUTHEAST- ERLY LINE OF LOT 27 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH- EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 27 TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BENJAMIN STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BENJAMIN STREET TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 29 IN SAID KEND- ALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 29 TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 84 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 84 TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 84; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF THE COMMONWEALTH EDISON RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF VAN EMMON STREET ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID VAN EMMON STREET ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID VAN EMMON STREET ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND SAID WEST LINE EXTENDED NORTH, TO THE NORTH LINE OF VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID VAN EMMON STREET TO THE WEST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED JULY 3, 1990, AS DOCUMENT 904281; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 12 IN SECTION 33, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED ON PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 96; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ILLINOIS RAILNET RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-156-016; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF SAID EAST LINE AND THE EAST LINES OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHERLY MOST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-156- 017; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL AND SAID WEST LINE EXTENDED TO THE NORTH LINE OF HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EX- TENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET AND THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 4 IN TER-JAC SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN SAID TER-JAC SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 6 FEET OF LOT I IN SAID TER- JAC SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF HEUSTIS STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 19 EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF EAST VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN TRUSTEE’S DEED DATED JANUARY 23, 2002 AND RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 200200002291; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF HEUSTIS STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE, EXTEND- ED NORTH, OF THE 20’ ALLEY RUNNING THROUGH BLOCK SIX OF BLACKS ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE EXTENDED NORTH AND SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN THE OLD SECOND NATIONAL BANK BRIDGE STREET SUBDIVISION; THENCE FOLLOWING A CLOCK- WISE DIRECTION AROUND THE PERIMETER OF SAID LOT 2 TO THE EAST LINE OF ROUTE 47; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO A BEND POINT IN SAID SOUTH LINE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG A WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BELL STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF BELL STREET AND THE WEST LINE OF BELL STREET EXTENDED SOUTH TO THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST FOX STREET; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE, TO THE WEST LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL TWO, DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 25, 2003 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 200300025623; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID SOUTH LINE AND ON THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 1, 2010 AS DOC- UMENT NUMBER 201000002076 TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 11 IN THE ORIGINAL VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE AND ON THE WEST LINE OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 11 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN SAID BLOCK 11; THENCE EASTERLY, ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE WEST LINE OF AFORESAID PARCEL TWO, DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 25, 2003 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 200300025623; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST FOX STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 14 IN THE ORIGINAL VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE; THENCE EASTERLY, ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7, 30 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7 AND ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 6 IN SAID BLOCK 14 TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE WEST- ERLY ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL WITH A PIN OF 02-32-429-002 AND OWNED BY THE COUNTY OF KENDALL; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTH- EAST CORNER OF VACATED RIDGE STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID VACATED RIDGE STREET TO THE EAST LINE OF VACATED JEFFERSON STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1995 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 9506986; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE, SAID LINE BEING THE CEN- TERLINE OF VACATED MADISON STREET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL, BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL, BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE, TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID WEST LINE TO THE EAST- ERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 28 IN SAID ORIGINAL VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 5 AND 6 IN SAID BLOCK 28, 125 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 3 IN SAID BLOCK; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID EAST LINE AND ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 4, 100 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 5 AND 6 IN SAID BLOCK 28 TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 1 IN BLACKS ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 6, 12, 11 AND 10 IN SAID BLOCK 1 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 10; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID SOUTH LINE AND ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 2 IN SAID BLOCK 1 TO THE WEST LINE OF ROUTE 47; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF WEST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF MORGAN STREET; DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 20 THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION TO THE NORTH LINE OF WEST HYDRAULIC AVE- NUE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF MORGAN STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID MORGAN STREET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF VACATED VAN EMMON STREET. THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 24 IN BLACKS SECOND ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 143 FEET OF LOTS 3 AND 4 IN SAID BLOCK 24; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE AND ON THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF SAID WEST LINE, TO THE NORTH LINE OF WEST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE, TO THE EAST LINE OF WHITE OAK FARM UNIT 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID EAST LINE, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL TWO, DESCRIBED IN TRUSTEES DEED RECORDED MARCH 5, 2004 AS DOCUMENT 200400005336; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF PARCEL 3, DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED, RE- CORDED OCTOBER 11, 2012 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 201200019862; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE, 100 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF MADISON STREET; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK 23 IN BLACKS SECOND ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID SOUTH- ERLY EXTENSION TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF VACATED MADISON STREET; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 21 IN SAID BLACKS SECOND ADDITION; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST MADISON STREET; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTH MAIN STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST WASHINGTON STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST WASHINGTON STREET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 10 FEET OF LOT 10 IN BLOCK 5 OF MASON’S AD- DITION TO THE TOWN OF YORKVILLE, EXTENDED SOUTH; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE EX- TENDED AND SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK 5; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND THE SOUTH LINES OF LOTS 2, 3 AND 4 IN SAID BLOCK 5 TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND SAID EAST LINE EXTENDED NORTH TO THE NORTH LINE OF EAST FOX STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-301-011; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND THE EAST LINE OF THE FOLLOWING 2 P.I.N.’S 02-33-301-008 AND 02-33-301-013 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN THE OLD SECOND NATIONAL BANK BRIDGE STREET SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-301-004; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND SAID SOUTH LINE EXTENDED EAST, TO THE EAST LINE OF HEUSTIS STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02- 33-304-005; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-304-014; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET; THENCE EASTERLY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILL STREET AND EAST RIDGE STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF MILL STREET TO THE NORTH LINE OF PRICE’S FIRST ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PRICE’S FIRST ADDITION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO AN OLD CLAIM LINE DESCRIBED IN QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED JULY 6, 1988 AS DOCU- MENT 883256; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID OLD CLAIM LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE COM- MONWEALTH EDISON RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTHWEST- ERLY LINE OF SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 21 EXHIBIT B: MAP OF REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Mill StB e n j a m i n S t W Fox St State StDeer StHeustis StE Fox St E Van Emmon St Beaver St W Ridge St Morgan StE Orange St Adrian StW Madison St Blaine St Elizabeth St Colonial Pkwy W River St Badger StE Washington St Garden St Illini Dr Wolf St Crooked Creek DrAdams StGawne L n W Van Emmon St W Orange St Wooden Bridge DrWalsh DrOlsen St Walter St E Barberry CirE Hydraulic Ave Wood Sage AveE Ridge St Worsley StDydyna CtW Hydraulic Ave Garden CirW Dolph St Bator StCornerst o n e D r W Was hi n gt o n St W Beecher St Rodak St Buhrm a st er Ct Illini CtState StMorgan StW Hydraulic Ave S Main StW Dolph St W Washington St S Bridge StS Bridge StSc h o o l h o u s e R d Sc h o o l h o u s e R d 47 126 Fox River LEGEND Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Boundary Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Parcels N All map data provided by the City of Yorkville Community Development Department. October 2017. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 22 EXHIBIT C: REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA CURRENT LAND USE MAP Mill StB e n j a m i n S t W Fox St State StDeer StHeustis StE Fox St E Van Emmon St Beaver St W Ridge St Morgan StE Orange St Adrian StW Madison St Blaine St Elizabeth St Colonial Pkwy W River St Badger StE Washington St Garden St Illini Dr Wolf St Crooked Creek DrAdams StGawne L n W Van Emmon St W Orange St Wooden Bridge DrWalsh DrOlsen St Walter St E Barberry CirE Hydraulic Ave Wood Sage AveE Ridge St Worsley StDydyna CtW Hydraulic Ave Garden CirW Dolph St Bator StCornerst o n e D r W Was hi n gt o n St W Beecher St Rodak St Buhrma st er Ct Illini CtState StMorgan StW Hydraulic Ave S Main StW Dolph St W Washington St S Bridge StS Bridge StSc h o o l h o u s e R d Sc h o o l h o u s e R d 47 126 Fox River LEGEND Residential Land Use N All map data provided by the City of Yorkville Community Development Department. October 2017. Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Boundary Commercial Land Use Industrial Land Use Public/Institutional Use Vacant Parking Lot DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 23 EXHIBIT D: MAP OF REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Mill StB e n j a m i n S t W Fox St State StDeer StHeustis StE Fox St E Van Emmon St Beaver St W Ridge St Morgan StE Orange St Adrian StW Madison St Blaine St Elizabeth St Colonial Pkwy W River St Badger StE Washington St Garden St Illini Dr Wolf St Crooked Creek DrAdams StGawne L n W Van Emmon St W Orange St Wooden Bridge DrWalsh DrOlsen St Walter St E Barberry CirE Hydraulic Ave Wood Sage AveE Ridge St Worsley StDydyna CtW Hydraulic Ave Garden CirW Dolph St Bator StCornerst o n e D r W Was hi n gt o n St W Beecher St Rodak St Buhrm a st er Ct Illini CtState StMorgan StW Hydraulic Ave S Main StW Dolph St W Washington St S Bridge StS Bridge StSc h o o l h o u s e R d Sc h o o l h o u s e R d 47 126 Fox River LEGEND Residential Land Use N All map data provided by the City of Yorkville Community Development Department. October 2017. Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Boundary Downtown Mixed Land Use Public/Institutional Land Use DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 1, 2017 PREPARED BY: JASON ENGBERG SENIOR PLANNER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 1 The United City of Yorkville is seeking to establish a new Tax Increment Financing District (TIF) in the central downtown portion of the City near Illinois Route 47 and Van Emmon Street. With the widening of Route 47, this older area of the City has seen a variety of proposed developments not come to fruition and has been identified as an area with significant economic development potential. An existing Downtown Redevelopment Project Area was established in this general area in 2006. Due to the timing of its establishment and the economic recession which followed, the existing Downtown Redevelopment Project Area has not reached its potential in terms of development and increment generation. Overall, equalized assessed values (EAVs) in the existing area have dropped and over the course of the past decade and those values are the primary factor in generating TIF Increment revenues. Since the adoption of a new Comprehensive Plan in 2016, Yorkville wants to encourage mixed-use structures compatible with Riverfront Park. This new plan specifies a wider range of properties and blocks in the downtown for potential mixed-use developments in the future than was thought in 2006. By developing a new TIF District and Redevelopment Project Area, the entire downtown which is set for long term planning will be covered by both districts. This Eligibility Report compares the characteristics of the study area to criteria outlined in state statutes for creation of a Redevelopment Project Area. As shown in Exhibit A – Project Area Boundary, the Project Area is positioned around the Route 47 and Van Emmon Street intersection. The Project Area general boundary contains a majority of the parcels both north and south of Van Emmon Street from 5 blocks West of Route 47 to 3 blocks east of Route 47, as well as parcels on the east side of Main Street from Madison Street to Washington Street, parcels on the west side of Mill St from Van Emmon Street to Ridge Street, parcels on the east side of Heustis Street from Van Emmon Street to Fox Street, and parcels on the east side of Route 47 from Washington Street to Van Emmon Street. The Project Area consists of 168 parcels containing 133 structures. The total area of the Project Area (including right-of-way) is approximately 86.6 acres. The report that follows is an assessment of the eligibility of the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2. INTRODUCTION DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 2 EXHIBIT A - PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY Mill StB e n j a m i n S t W Fox St State StDeer StHeustis StE Fox St E Van Emmon St Beaver St W Ridge St Morgan StE Orange St Adrian StW Madison St Blaine St Elizabeth St Colonial Pkwy W River St Badger StE Washington St Garden St Illini Dr Wolf St Crooked Creek DrAdams StGawne L n W Van Emmon St W Orange St Wooden Bridge DrWalsh DrOlsen St Walter St E Barberry CirE Hydraulic Ave Wood Sage AveE Ridge St Worsley StDydyna CtW Hydraulic Ave Garden CirW Dolph St Bator StCornerst o n e D r W Was hi n gt o n St W Beecher St Rodak St Buhrm a st er Ct Illini CtState StMorgan StW Hydraulic Ave S Main StW Dolph St W Washington St S Bridge StS Bridge StSc h o o l h o u s e R d Sc h o o l h o u s e R d 47 126 Fox River LEGEND Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Boundary Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Parcels N All map data provided by the City of Yorkville Community Development Department. October 2017. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 3 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING The Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11 - 74.4 -1, et seq., as amended (the “Act”), stipulates specific procedures which must be adhered to in designating a Redevelopment Project Area and amendments thereto. A Redevelopment Project Area is defined as: “…an area designated by the municipality, which is not less in the aggregate than 1 ½ acres and in respect to which the municipality has made a finding that there exist conditions which cause the area to be classified as an industrial park conservation area, or a blighted area or a conservation area, or a combination of both blighted areas and conservation areas” (65 ILCS 5/ 11-74.4-3(p)). Section 5/11-74.4-3(a) defines a “conservation area” as: “…any improved area within the boundaries of a redevelopment project area located within the territorial limits of the municipality in which 50% or more of the structures in the area have an age of 35 years or more. Such an area is not yet a blighted area, but because of a combination of 3 or more of the following factors: dilapidation; obsolescence; deterioration; presence of structures below minimum code standards; illegal use of individual structures; excessive vacancies; lack of ventilation, light, or sanitary facilities; inadequate utilities; excessive land coverage and overcrowding of structures and community facilities; deleterious land use or layout; lack of community planning; environmental remediation costs impede development; decline or minimal marginal increase in equalized assessed valuation; is detrimental to the public safety, health, morals, or welfare and such an area may become a blighted area.” This report summarizes the analyses and findings of the City’s Community Development Department. The Downtown TIF District #2 Study Area (the “Project Area”) is eligible for designation as a conservation area based on the presence of vacant parcels that exhibit: (1) Deterioration of structures and site improvements in neighboring areas adjacent to the vacant land; (2) Need for environmental remediation; (3) Declining total equalized assessed value, as defined by the act; As well as the presence of improved parcels that exhibit: (1) Age of buildings averaging greater than 35 years; (2) Deterioration of site or structures on the subject parcels; (3) Obsolescence; (4) Inadequate utilities; (5) Lack of community planning; and (6) Declining total equalized assessed value, as defined by the Act. The present condition of the Project Area inhibits development potential. This report elaborates further on the specific conditions, which have contributed to this decline. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 4 ELIGIBILITY FINDINGS The United City of Yorkville Community Development Department conducted a field survey of every property within the Project Area. Based on an inspection of the exteriors of buildings and grounds, field notes were taken to record the condition for each parcel. This survey occurred on July 10, 2017. Photographs further document the observed conditions. Field observations were supplemented with additional City information. The Act indicates different qualifying criteria for vacant land and improved land. As illustrated in Exhibit B - Vacant and Improved Land, the Project Area contains a mix of vacant and improved land uses. To ensure proper designation, the vacant and improved parcels were evaluated according to the criteria for each respective land use. Obsolete platting refers to vacant land that results in parcels of limited or narrow size or configurations of parcels of irregular size or shape that would be difficult to develop on a planned basis and in a manner compatible with contemporary standards and requirements, or platting that failed to create right-of-ways for streets or alleys or that created inadequate right-of-way widths for streets, alleys, or other public right-of-way or that omitted easements for public utilities. The layout, shape, and size of vacant parcels located throughout the Project Area do not demonstrate obsolete platting. Many of the parcels are located in the Kendallwood Estates subdivision which is platted specifically for new single family home development. Additionally, the other vacant properties are an adequate size and shape to develop the uses intended in their respective zones. Due to the lack of presence and distribution of parcels exhibiting obsolete platting, this factor does not contribute to the designation of the Project Area as a conservation area. OBSOLETE PLATTING VACANT LAND In order to be designated as a blighted area, a combination of at least two (2) of the qualifying factors outlined in the Act must be present to a meaningful extent and reasonably distributed throughout the Project Area (or in this case, reasonably distributed throughout the vacant portion of the Project Area). Exhibit B illustrates the vacant properties in the Project Area (50 parcels). Diversity of ownership of parcels of vacant land sufficient in number to retard or impede the ability to assemble the land for development. While there are several different owners of the vacant land within the Project Area, it is not considered a major impediment to development. Therefore, diversity of ownership does not contribute to the Project Area as a conservation area. DIVERSITY OF OWNERSHIP Tax and special assessment delinquencies exist or the property has been the subject of tax sales under the Property Tax Code within the last 5 years. There are no significant known tax or special assessment delinquencies present on the vacant parcels within the Project Area, and therefore, tax delinquency does not contribute to the Project Area as a conservation area. TAX AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DELINQUENCIES DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 5 EXHIBIT B - VACANT AND IMPROVED LAND Mill StB e n j a m i n S t W Fox St State StDeer StHeustis StE Fox St E Van Emmon St Beaver St W Ridge St Morgan StE Orange St Adrian StW Madison St Blaine St Elizabeth St Colonial Pkwy W River St Badger StE Washington St Garden St Illini Dr Wolf St Crooked Creek DrAdams StGawne L n W Van Emmon St W Orange St Wooden Bridge DrWalsh DrOlsen St Walter St E Barberry CirE Hydraulic Ave Wood Sage AveE Ridge St Worsley StDydyna CtW Hydraulic Ave Garden CirW Dolph St Bator StCornerst o n e D r W Was hi n gt o n St W Beecher St Rodak St Buhrm a st er Ct Illini CtState StMorgan StW Hydraulic Ave S Main StW Dolph St W Washington St S Bridge StS Bridge StSc h o o l h o u s e R d Sc h o o l h o u s e R d 47 126 Fox River LEGEND Vacant Parcels N All map data provided by the City of Yorkville Community Development Department. October 2017. Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Boundary Improved Parcels DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 6 Deterioration of structures or site improvements in neighboring areas adjacent to the vacant land refers to physical deficiencies or disrepair in buildings or site improvements requiring treatment or repair. Examples of deterioration of buildings and surface improvements on improved parcels within the Project Area are outlined in the following section, “Improved Land.” Additionally, the parcels adjacent to the Kendallwood Estate properties which are not in the proposed Project Area show minor site and building deterioration as determined by field observations. Due to the presence of structures and site improvements demonstrating deterioration in neighboring areas adjacent to vacant parcels within the Project Area, deterioration is a contributing factor towards designation of the Project Area as a conservation area. DETERIORATION OF NEIGHBORING STRUCTURES OR SITES This factor is relevant when the area has incurred Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs for, or a study conducted by an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has determined a need for, the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances, or underground storage tanks required by State or federal law, provided that the remediation costs constitute a material impediment to the development or redevelopment of the redevelopment project area. There is approximately 2.4 acres of vacant property within the Project Area which require environmental remediation per the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA). A Comprehensive Site Investigation Report was conducted in 2007 and the parcels are generally located between E Van Emmon Street and Hydraulic Street and west of Heustis Street. The site is recognized by the IEPA as “Grainco” and is LPC# 0930255064. This accounts of nearly 10% of the vacant property within the TIF and is a major site for redevelopment. The quantity of environmental remediation sites compared to the overall vacant properties within the Project Area is significant and does contribute to the Project area as a conservation area. ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION This factor can be cited if the total equalized assessed value of the proposed redevelopment project area has declined for three of the last five calendar years, for which information is available; or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality for three of the last five calendar years, for which information is available; or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor or successor agency for three of the last five calendar years, for which information is available. Levy Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Project Area Parcels (EAV)$163,460 $146,309 $145,109 $211,109 $213,493 $226,909 Percent Change -10.49% -0.82%45.48% 1.13% 6.28% City’s Total EAV $490,538,275 $443,686,399 $420,637,121 $418,661,883 $426,766,690 $458,924,589 Percent Change -9.55% -5.19% -0.47%1.94% 7.54% The equalized assessed value for all the vacant parcels in the Project Area has decreased two out of the past five levy years. The rate of growth of the vacant properties over the past five years compared to the City’s overall EAV growth has been slower in 3 of the past 5 years (2012, 2015, 2016). Decline in the equalized assessed value (EAV) contributes toward the designation of the Project Area as a conservation area based on decline in EAV compared to the City’s total EAV over the past five years. DECLINE OR MINIMAL MARGINAL INCREASE IN THE EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 7 Based on field analysis and data collected from Kendall County, a total of 109 out of 126 (83.2%) structures within the Project Area were built more than 35 years ago (1982). This exceeds the statutory requirement that at least 50% of the buildings in the conservation area be 35 years of age or older. AGE OF BUILDINGS Dilapidation refers to an advanced state of disrepair or neglect of necessary repairs to the primary structural components of buildings or improvements in such a combination that a documented building condition analysis determines that major repair is required or the defects are so serious and so extensive that the buildings must be removed. No structures in the Project Area display this extreme physical state of disrepair. Therefore, dilapidation does not significantly contribute towards the designation of the Project Area as a conservation area. DILAPIDATION Obsolescence is the condition or process of falling into disuse. Obsolete structures have become ill-suited for the original use. With respect to properties and buildings, the nature of obsolescence may be functional or economic, or a combination of both. Generally, functional obsolescence relates to the physical utility of a property or structure, and economic obsolescence relates to the ability of a property or building to compete in the market place. A. Functional Obsolescence The design and spatial layout of buildings and site improvements and their geographical location respond to market needs for specific uses at the time those buildings and improvements are constructed. Additionally, buildings and improvements are designed within the technological constraints of the time. Design and spatial layout characteristics of buildings and site improvements include, but are not limited to, floor area, height, column spacing, loading and service areas, building orientation, on-site parking and storage areas, and vehicular circulation. Over time, geographical and structural changes occur within industries and real estate markets causing properties to become ill suited for their original use, resulting in deficiencies in those buildings that limit their ability to function for their original purpose. This loss in functionality and overall usefulness or desirability of a property, diminishes the value of the property and the building. B. Economic Obsolescence Economic obsolescence is generally a result of building or site improvements that cause some degree of market rejection, resulting in a diminished market value of the property for its original intended use. Symptoms of economic obsolescence include excessive vacancies, lack of maintenance, deterioration, and dilapidation of buildings and site improvements. Site improvements, including sewer and water lines, public utility lines (gas, electric, and telephone), roadways, parking areas, parking structures, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, lighting, etc., may also evidence obsolescence in terms of their relationship to contemporary development standards for such improvements. Factors of this type of obsolescence may include inadequate utility capacities, outdated designs, etc. Typically, buildings with excessive vacancies or those classified as deteriorating or dilapidated contain OBSOLESCENCE IMPROVED LAND In order to be designated as a conservation area, at least 50% of the structures must be 35 years or more in age. Additionally, a combination of at least three of the other qualifying factors outlined in the Act must be present to a meaningful extent and reasonably distributed throughout the Project Area. There are a total of 118 improved lots within the Project Area. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 8 undesirable building or site improvement conditions that may be infeasible to cure, resulting in an accelerated decline in market value. When not corrected, these building and site improvement deficiencies adversely impact neighboring areas, thereby detracting from the physical, functional, and economic vitality of the overall area. Obsolescence, both functional and economic, is widely present within the Project Area. There are a few structures which are functionally and economically obsolete from their original use north of East Van Emmon Street. Additionally, almost all of the parcels within the Project Area are functionally obsolete. The lot sizes and shapes of the parcels do not conform to the standards the City currently maintains. This includes flag lots, parcels without an access point, structures located on more than one parcel, and structures encroaching in required yards. The layout of the parcels and the structures upon them are no longer functional and are a deterrent to development. Therefore, the presence of both functional and economic obsolescence of buildings and site improvements does significantly contribute towards the designation of the Project Area as a conservation area. With respect to buildings, deterioration refers to defects including, but not limited to, major defects in the secondary building components such as doors, windows, porches, gutters and downspouts, and fascia. The field survey found that 38 out of 126 buildings (29%) exhibit these types of deteriorating characteristics. These deteriorating effects include cracks in masonry walls and foundations, aging windows and doors, deteriorating columns, and roofs and gutters in need of repair. These issues are widely distributed throughout the Project Area. With respect to surface improvements, the condition of roadways, alleys, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, off-street parking, and surface storage areas may evidence deterioration, including, but not limited to, surface cracking, crumbling, potholes, depressions, loose paving material, and weeds protruding through paved surfaces. Deterioration of surface improvements was found on 66 out of 126 parcels (52.4%) in the Project Area. Poor condition of streets, sidewalks, paved parking areas, driveways, and curbs were the most common examples. The distribution of deterioration, both of buildings and surface improvements, is widely distributed throughout the Project Area (Exhibit C – Deterioration). In terms of overall deterioration, 22.7 acres of the 33.7 acres (67.4%) of all parcels within the Project Area exhibit either building deterioration, site deterioration, or a combination of both. The presence of deterioration of buildings and surface improvements and its is reasonable distribution throughout the area contributes towards the designation of the Project Area as a conservation area. DETERIORATION Illegal use of individual structures refers to the use of structures in violation of applicable federal, State, or local laws, exclusive of those applicable to the presence of structures below minimum code standards. The exterior field survey conducted by United City of Yorkville found no obvious instances of illegal use of structures within the Project Area. Therefore, illegal use of individual structures does not contribute to the designation of the Project Area as a conservation area. ILLEGAL USE OF INDIVIDUAL STRUCTURES DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 9 EXHIBIT C - DETERIORATION Mill StB e n j a m i n S t W Fox St State StDeer StHeustis StE Fox St E Van Emmon St Beaver St W Ridge St Morgan StE Orange St Adrian StW Madison St Blaine St Elizabeth St Colonial Pkwy W River St Badger StE Washington St Garden St Illini Dr Wolf St Crooked Creek DrAdams StGawne L n W Van Emmon St W Orange St Wooden Bridge DrWalsh DrOlsen St Walter St E Barberry CirE Hydraulic Ave Wood Sage AveE Ridge St Worsley StDydyna CtW Hydraulic Ave Garden CirW Dolph St Bator StCornerst o n e D r W Was hi n gt o n St W Beecher St Rodak St Buhrm a st er Ct Illini CtState StMorgan StW Hydraulic Ave S Main StW Dolph St W Washington St S Bridge StS Bridge StSc h o o l h o u s e R d Sc h o o l h o u s e R d 47 126 Fox River LEGEND Site Deterioration N All map data provided by the City of Yorkville Community Development Department. October 2017. Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Boundary Building Deterioration Both Site & Building Deterioration DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 10 SITE DETERIORATION EXAMPLES DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 11 BUILDING DETERIORATION EXAMPLES DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 12 Excessive vacancies refer to the presence of buildings that are unoccupied or under-utilized and that represent an adverse influence on the area because of the frequency, extent, or duration of the vacancies. Four of the 126 buildings are vacant or partially vacant throughout the Project Area (3.2%). Although vacancies are present within the Project Area, they are concentrated, not evenly distributed throughout the Project Area, and not numerous enough in quantity to be considered excessive. Therefore, excessive vacancies do not contribute towards designation of the Project Area as a conservation area. EXCESSIVE VACANCIES Inadequate ventilation is characterized by the absence of adequate ventilation for light or air circulation in spaces or rooms without windows, or that require the removal of dust, odor, gas, smoke, or other noxious airborne materials. Inadequate natural light and ventilation means the absence or inadequacy of skylights or windows for interior spaces or rooms and improper window sizes and amounts by room area to window area ratios. Inadequate sanitary facilities refer to the absence or inadequacy of garbage storage and enclosure, bathroom facilities, hot water and kitchens, and structural inadequacies preventing ingress and egress to and from all rooms and units within a building. None of the buildings in the Project Area are known to exhibit this characteristic of lack of ventilation, light or sanitary facilities. Therefore, lack of ventilation, light, or sanitary facilities does not contribute to the designation of the Project Area as a conservation area. LACK OF VENTILATION, LIGHT, OR SANITARY FACILITIES This factor relates to all underground and overhead utilities such as storm sewers and storm drainage, sanitary sewers, water lines, and gas, telephone, and electrical services that are shown to be inadequate. Inadequate utilities are those that are: (i) of insufficient capacity to serve the uses in the redevelopment project area, (ii) deteriorated, antiquated, obsolete, or in disrepair, or (iii)lacking within the redevelopment project area. An evaluation of utilities within the Project Area was conducted by the City Engineer and Director of Public Works. In terms of water services, there are several locations where the water mains are not sufficient in size to meet capacity standards. This includes stretches along Madison Court, Main Street, and W Washington Street. The sanitary sewer lines are sufficient in size for capacity in all of downtown but they are old clay pipes and require lining. The deteriorating conditions of the existing sanitary sewer lines is a existing condition the City has been actively trying to remedy. Finally, storm sewers are lacking within the entire Project Area. Since this is the oldest part of the Yorkville community, the presence of storm sewers is below capacity. Additionally, the sewer lines which do exist are old and deteriorating. After the analysis conducted by the City Engineering Department and Public Works Department, there are many utilities in the Project Area which are insufficient in capacity and quality. Therefore, the presence of inadequate utilities is a contributing factor to the designation of the Project Area as a conservation area. INADEQUATE UTILITIES Deleterious land uses include the existence of incompatible land-use relationships, buildings occupied by inappropriate mixed-uses, or uses considered to be noxious, offensive, or unsuitable for the surrounding area. While there are several locations within the Project Area which have incompatible land uses next to each other, for example manufacturing next to residential, a majority of the land uses in the area are residential and compatible with on another. Therefore, deleterious land use does not significantly contribute to the designation of the Project Area as a conservation area. DELETERIOUS LAND USE OR LAYOUT DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 13 This factor relates to the over-intensive use of property and the crowding of buildings and accessory facilities onto a site. Examples of problem conditions warranting the designation of an area as exhibiting excessive land coverage are: the presence of buildings either improperly situated on parcels or located on parcels of inadequate size and shape, in relation to present-day standards of development for health and safety, and the presence of multiple buildings on a single parcel. For there to be a finding of excessive land coverage, these parcels must exhibit one or more of the following conditions: insufficient provision for light and air within or around buildings, increased threat of spread of fire due to the close proximity of buildings, lack of adequate or proper access to a public right-of-way, lack of reasonably required off-street parking, or inadequate provision for loading and service. There are 6 out of the 131 structures (4.6%) which excessively cover the parcels where they are located . Therefore, excessive land coverage and overcrowding of structures and community facilities does not contribute to the designation of the Project Area as a conservation area. EXCESSIVE LAND COVERAGE AND OVERCROWDING OF STRUCTURES Lack of community planning occurs when the proposed redevelopment project area was developed prior to or without the benefit or guidance of a community plan. This means that the development occurred prior to the adoption by the municipality of a comprehensive or other community plan or that the plan was not followed at the time of the area’s development. This factor must be documented by evidence of adverse or incompatible land-use relationships, inadequate street layout, improper subdivision, parcels of inadequate shape and size to meet contemporary development standards, or other evidence demonstrating an absence of effective community planning. The United City of Yorkville adopted its first Comprehensive Plan in 1974. A majority of the parcels and structures within the Project Area were platted and constructed before the City had a plan for the area’s development. Additionally, there are an abundant amount of parcels which are oddly shaped, have structures on them which are oddly laid out and have small setbacks from neighbors, and there are many incompatible land uses adjacent to each other. All of these factors illustrate a lack of community planning throughout the entire Project Area. Lack of community planning is prevalent throughout the Project Area, and therefore, qualifies as a factor towards designation of a conservation area. LACK OF COMMUNITY PLANNING This factor is relevant when the area has incurred Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or United States Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs for, or a study conducted by an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has determined a need for, the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances, or underground storage tanks required by State or federal law, provided that the remediation costs constitute a material impediment to the development or redevelopment of the redevelopment project area. There are no improved properties which require environmental remediation. Therefore, this factor does not contribute to the designation of the Project Area as a conservation area. ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 14 Structures below minimum code standards include all structures that do not meet the standards of zoning, subdivision, building, fire, and other governmental codes applicable to property, but not including housing and property maintenance codes. In 2013, the City began a substantive and concentrated effort to address ongoing building code violations throughout the downtown. Over the past four (4) years of conducting these “downtown sweeps”, the City has issued nearly 80 citations resulting in numerous violations and judgments. While a majority of these citations were property maintenance related, the more significant building code violations were related to either exterior damage or structural soundness, which have been addressed with the recent demolition of several buildings. At the time the field survey was conducted, information was gathered from the City’s Building Official; it was determined that there were no presence of structures below minimum code standards. While there are several buildings showing deterioration or violation of current zoning bulk regulations, these structures are considered legally non-conforming uses and therefore do not qualify as they are currently legal structures. The City maintains but for future redevelopment in this area, continual building code violations will occur. The presence of structures below minimum code standards does not contribute towards the designation of the Project Area as a conservation area. PRESENCE OF STRUCTURES BELOW MINIMUM CODE STANDARDS This factor can be cited if the total equalized assessed value of the proposed redevelopment project area has declined for three of the last five calendar years, for which information is available; or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality for three of the last five calendar years, for which information is available; or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor or successor agency for three of the last five calendar years, for which information is available. Levy Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Project Area Parcels (EAV)$4,857,551 $4,641,064 $4,255,518 $4,217,153 $4,273,954 $4,487,777 Percent Change -4.46% -8.31% -0.90%1.35% 5.00% The equalized assessed value for all the parcels in the Project Area has decreased three out of the past five levy years. Decline in the equalized assessed value (EAV) contributes toward the designation of the Project Area as a conservation area based on decline in EAV of the Project Area over the previous five years. DECLINE OR MINIMAL MARGINAL INCREASE IN THE EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 15 Based on the findings contained herein, the Project Area qualifies as a conservation area according to the criteria established by the Act, based on the predominance and extent of parcels exhibiting the following primary characteristics: VACANT LAND (1) Deterioration of structures and site improvements in neighboring areas adjacent to the vacant land; (2) Need for environmental remediation; (3) Declining total equalized assessed value, as defined by the act. IMPROVED LAND (1) Age of buildings averaging greater than 35 years; (2) Deterioration of site or structures on the subject parcels; (3) Obsolescence (4) Inadequate utilities; (5) Lack of community planning; and (6) Declining total equalized assessed value, as defined by the Act. Each of these factors contributes significantly to the eligibility of the Project Area as a conservation area. All of these characteristics point to the need for designation of the Project Area as a conservation area, to be followed by public intervention in order that redevelopment might occur. CONCLUSION DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 ELIGIBILITY REPORT | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 16 PINS The Following is a list of the PINs within the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2: 02-32-252-001 02-32-284-002 02-32-434-005 02-33-307-003 05-04-131-002 02-32-252-003 02-32-284-003 02-33-154-009 02-33-307-004 05-04-131-003 02-32-252-004 02-32-284-004 02-33-154-015 02-33-307-005 05-04-130-004 02-32-252-005 02-32-284-005 02-33-154-019 02-33-307-014 05-04-130-003 02-32-252-006 02-32-284-006 02-33-154-020 02-33-307-016 05-04-130-002 02-32-252-008 02-32-285-001 02-33-154-022 02-33-307-018 05-04-130-001 02-32-252-010 02-32-285-002 02-33-154-023 02-33-307-020 05-04-129-001 02-32-252-011 02-32-285-003 02-33-156-004 02-33-307-021 05-04-129-002 02-32-253-001 02-32-285-004 02-33-156-005 02-33-307-022 05-04-129-003 02-32-253-002 02-32-286-001 02-33-156-006 02-33-326-008 05-04-129-004 02-32-253-003 02-32-286-002 02-33-156-007 02-32-280-004 05-04-129-005 02-32-253-004 02-32-286-003 02-33-156-008 02-32-280-005 05-04-129-006 02-32-280-002 02-32-286-004 02-33-156-009 02-32-280-006 05-04-129-007 02-32-280-003 02-32-286-005 02-33-156-014 02-32-280-007 05-04-129-008 02-32-280-010 02-32-287-001 02-33-156-018 02-32-280-008 05-04-129-009 02-32-280-011 02-32-287-005 02-33-157-007 02-32-280-009 05-04-128-001 02-32-280-012 02-32-287-007 02-33-157-008 02-33-154-013 05-04-128-002 02-32-280-013 02-32-287-008 02-33-158-004 02-33-154-014 05-04-128-003 02-32-280-014 02-32-291-001 02-33-177-001 02-33-154-018 05-04-128-004 02-32-280-015 02-32-291-002 02-33-177-002 02-33-326-004 05-04-128-005 02-32-280-016 02-32-292-002 02-33-177-013 02-33-377-001 05-04-128-006 02-32-281-001 02-32-429-001 02-33-178-001 02-33-377-007 05-04-128-007 02-32-281-002 02-32-429-002 02-33-301-002 02-33-377-008 05-04-128-008 02-32-281-003 02-32-429-003 02-33-301-003 02-33-377-009 05-04-128-009 02-32-281-006 02-32-429-009 02-33-301-004 02-33-377-020 02-32-281-007 02-32-429-010 02-33-301-008 02-33-377-021 02-32-282-001 02-32-433-001 02-33-301-011 02-33-377-022 02-32-282-003 02-32-433-002 02-33-301-013 02-33-377-023 02-32-282-004 02-32-433-003 02-33-301-015 02-33-377-024 02-32-282-005 02-32-433-004 02-33-302-017 02-33-377-034 02-32-282-006 02-32-433-005 02-33-302-021 02-33-377-033 02-32-283-001 02-32-433-008 02-33-304-004 05-04-127-001 02-32-283-002 02-32-433-009 02-33-304-005 05-04-127-002 02-32-283-003 02-32-433-011 02-33-304-019 05-04-127-003 02-32-283-004 02-32-433-013 02-33-304-020 05-04-127-004 02-32-284-001 02-32-434-004 02-33-307-002 05-04-131-001 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 1, 2017 PREPARED BY: JASON ENGBERG SENIOR PLANNER CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS DRAFT DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 HOUSING STUDY | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 1 For the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Study Area, officials of the United City of Yorkville have determined that, without direct municipal involvement and financial assistance, planning objectives for the area cannot be met. To encourage new investment in the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2, the City has decided to utilize Tax Increment Financing (TIF) as one of several potential financial tools to facilitate redevelopment. As a part of the feasibility study for a proposed TIF district, the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/11 - 74.4 - 1, et seq.) (the Act) stipulates that a Housing Impact Study must be prepared when: “the redevelopment plan would result in the displacement of residents from 10 or more inhabited residential units, or if the redevelopment project area contains 75 or more inhabited residential units and no certification is made [ that the redevelopment plan will not result in displacement of residents]... (Section 11-74.4-3(n)(5))” The implementation of the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Redevelopment Plan may result in the displacement of as many as 8 residential units. While this does not exceed the displacement of 10 or more inhabited residential unit’s threshold, the redevelopment project area contains 102 inhabited residential dwelling units, which is greater than the threshold of 75 or more inhabited dwelling units. Therefore, completion of this Housing Impact Study is required. This estimate is based on a field inventory completed as a part of the TIF Eligibility Study, conducted on July 10, 2017. The City has recently prepared a Comprehensive Plan which recommends future land uses within the proposed Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2. Some of the existing residential units have been projected to be displaced in order to facilitate redevelopment opportunities. Therefore, the United City of Yorkville has prepared this report to satisfy the requirements of Section 11-74.4-3(n)(5). The number and type of residential buildings in the Project Area potentially affected by the Redevelopment Plan were identified during the building condition and land use survey conducted as part of the eligibility analysis for the Project Area. A good faith estimate and determination of the number of residential units within each such building, whether such residential units were inhabited, and whether the inhabitants were low-income or very low-income households were based on a number of research and analytical tools including physical building surveys, data received from the City of Yorkville, and the 2015 American Community Survey (ACS). INTRODUCTION DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 HOUSING STUDY | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 2 The Act stipulates specific information that must be provided in a Housing Impact Study. According to the Act, Part I of the Housing Impact Study shall include: i. data as to whether the residential units are single family or multi-family units, ii. the number and type of rooms within the units, if that information is available, iii. whether the units are inhabited or uninhabited, as determined not less than 45 days before the date that the ordinance or resolution required by subsection (a) of Section 11-74.4-5 is passed, and iv. data as to the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units. The data requirement as to the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units shall be deemed to be fully satisfied by data from the most recent federal census. PART 1: HOUSING INVENTORY Table 1 describes the residential units by type. TABLE 1 | DWELLING UNITS BY TYPE Housing Type # of Housing Units % of Housing Units Single-Family 64 62.7% Multi-Family 38 37.3% Total 102 100% Source: Field Survey - July 10, 2017 TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL USES For purposes of this study, data has been gathered from the United States Census 2015 American Community Survey and represented in the form of Block Groups. A Block Group is a combination of census blocks. The Block Group is the lowest level of geography for which the Census Bureau has tabulated data. In this study, Yorkville has relied on the 2015 American Community Survey because it contains the best available information regarding the structures and residents of the Downtown TIF District #2. The Project Area contains portions of the block group 1 and block group 4 of Census Tract 8906.00. In total, there are 102 housing units and approximately 264 residents within the Project Area (Table 2). TABLE 2 | HOUSING UNITS AND POPULATION Census Tract Block Group Average Household Size Housing Units Estimated Number of Residents 8906.00 1 2.91 64 186 8906.00 4 2.05 38 78 Total 102 264 Source: 2015 American Community Survey NUMBER OF RESIDENTS DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 HOUSING STUDY | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 3 Table 3 shows the estimated number of bedrooms in residential units in the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2. As defined by the Census Bureau, number of bedrooms includes all rooms intended for use as bedrooms even if they are currently used for some other purpose. A residential unit consisting of only one room, such as a one-room efficiency apartment, is classified by definition as having no bedroom. TABLE 3 | ESTIMATED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS PER DWELLING UNIT Census Tract 8906.00 Block Group 1 Block Group 4 Number of Bedrooms Dwelling Units Percentage Dwelling Units Percentage 0 Bedrooms 1 2%0 0% 1 Bedroom 3 4%1 3% 2 Bedrooms 12 18%25 65% 3 Bedrooms 21 34%8 21% 4 Bedrooms 20 31%3 9% 5 or More Bedrooms 7 11%1 2% Total 64 100%38 100% Source: 2015 American Community Survey NUMBER OF BEDROOMS Table 4 shows the estimated number of conventional residential units in the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 with kitchen and plumbing facilities. As defined by the Census Bureau, a unit has complete kitchen facilities when it has all of the following: (1) an installed sink with piped water; (2) a range, cook top and convection or microwave oven, or cook stove; and (3) a refrigerator. All kitchen facilities must be located in the structure. They need not be in the same room. Portable cooking equipment is not considered a range or cook stove. An ice box is not considered to be a refrigerator. As defined by the Census Bureau, complete plumbing facilities include hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet, and a bathtub or shower. All three facilities must be located inside the house, apartment, or mobile home, but not necessarily in the same room. Housing facilities are classified as lacking complete plumbing facilities when any of the three facilities are not present. TABLE 4 | ESTIMATED NUMBER OF UNITS WITH KITCHEN AND PLUMBING FACILITIES Facility Units with Facility % of Units Units without Facility % of Units Kitchen 94 92%8 8% Plumbing 100 98%2 2% Source: 2015 American Community Survey UNITS WITH KITCHEN AND PLUMBING FACILITIES INHABITED UNITS The occupancy status of the residential units in the Project Area must be determined not less than 45 days prior to the adoption of an ordinance or resolution fixing the time and place for public hearing. As of that date, as determined initially by a building-by-building field survey, an estimated 1.1% of units in the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 were determined to be uninhabited (1 Dwelling Unit). Therefore, 93 residential units in the Project Area are assumed to be inhabited. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 HOUSING STUDY | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 4 As required by the Act, the racial and ethnic composition of the residents in the inhabited residential units is determined according to the most recent Federal census data. As noted, there are an estimated 264 residents in project area. Racial and ethnic composition is available from the 2015 American Community Survey. Table 5 identifies residents by their racial and ethnic composition, and estimates the racial and ethnic composition of the estimated 264 residents of the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2. TABLE 5 | ESTIMATED RACIAL AND ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF RESIDENTS Race 8906.00, Block Group 1 8906.00 Block Group 4 Total Percent of Population Estimated in Project Area White Only 3,493 973 4466 96.7%255 Black or African American Only 71 14 85 1.8%5 American Indian and Alaskan Native Only 0 0 0 0.0%0 Asian Only 0 0 0 0.0%0 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Only 0 0 0 0.0%0 Other Single Race 15 12 27 0.6%2 Two or More Races 30 12 42 0.9%2 TOTAL 3,609 1011 4620 100.0%264 Source: 2015 American Community Survey RACIAL AND ETHNIC COMPOSITION The distribution of household income for residents within the Project Area is based on 2015 American Community Survey data. In order to estimate the number of moderate, low, very low, and extremely low-income households in the Project Area, Census Tract household incomes from the 2015 American Community Survey were used. As determined by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), the definitions of the income categories, adjusted for household size, are as follows: i. An extremely low-income household has an adjusted income of not more than 30% of the area median income. ii. A very low-income household has an adjusted income of more than 30% and not more than 50% of the area median income. iii. A low-income household has an adjusted income of more than 50% and not more than 80% of the area median. iv. A moderate-income household has an adjusted income of more than 80% and not more than 120% of the area median. The median household income for the City of Yorkville is $89,850, based on data from the 2015 American Community Survey. The estimates of households at or below the moderate-income level collectively represent approximately 61.4% of the total inhabited residential units in the Project Area. As a result, the City will implement the Redevelopment Plan (including the requirements applicable to composition of the joint review board under Section 11-74.4-5(b)of the Act) as if more than 50 percent of the residential units are occupied by extremely low, very low, low ,or moderate income households. ECONOMIC COMPOSITION DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 HOUSING STUDY | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 5 TABLE 6 | STUDY AREA EXTREMELY LOW, VERY LOW, LOW, AND MODERATE HOUSEHOLD INCOME LEVEL Median Household Income Level Income Categories Based on Level % of Households within Study Area Extremely Low Income (1)$0-$26,955 11.4% Very Low Income (2)$26,956-$44,925 12.1% Low Income (3)$44,926-$71,880 16.1% Moderate Income (4)$71,881-$107,820 21.8% Source: 2015 American Community Survey 1. Definition of Extremely Low Income Household as defined by the Illinois Affordable Housing Act: “Extremely low-income household” means a single person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is not more than 30% of the median income of the area of residence. 2. Definition of Very Low Income Household as defined by the Illinois Affordable Housing Act: “Very low- income household” means a single person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is not more than 50% of the median income of the area of residence. 3. Definition of Low Income Household as defined by the Illinois Affordable Housing Act: “Low-income household” means a single person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is more than 50% but less than 80% of the median income of the area of residence. 4. “ Moderate income household” means a single person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is more than 80% but less than 120% of the median income of the area of residence. 5. The percentages of the study area households that qualify as extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income were determined at the block group level, as per 2014 American Community Survey data. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 HOUSING STUDY | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 6 The Act specifies that the second part of a Housing Impact Study must: “…identify the inhabited residential units in the proposed redevelopment project area that are to be or may be removed. If inhabited residential units are to be removed, then the housing impact study shall identify (i) the number and location of those units that will or may be removed, ( ii) the municipality’s plans for relocation assistance for those residents in the proposed redevelopment project area whose residences are to be removed, (iii) the availability of replacement housing for those residents whose residences are to be removed, and shall identify the type, location, and cost of the housing, and (iv) the type and extent of relocation assistance to be provided.” PART 2: RELOCATION PLANS The Redevelopment Plan indicates that inhabited residential units may be redeveloped during the 23-year lifetime of the TIF. Residential units may be displaced from the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 in order to facilitate potential future development opportunities. The potential removal of any buildings containing residential units and any displacement of residents of inhabited units will be done within the intent of the Redevelopment Plan. These units, if displaced, are likely to be displaced over time throughout the life of the Redevelopment Plan. RESIDENTIAL UNITS WHICH MAY BE DISPLACED According to data in the 2015 American Community Survey, approximately 79% of housing units in the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 are owner occupied. Conversely, approximately 20% of housing units in TIF District #2 are estimated to be renter occupied. The remaining 1% of residential units are vacant. Therefore, both for-sale and for-rent units are considered for potential replacement housing. TABLE 7 | OWNER VS. RENTER OCCUPANCY Number Percentage Owner Occupied 81 79.4% Renter Occupied 20 19.6% Vacant 1 1.0% Total:102 100.0% Source: 2015 American Community Survey In order to determine appropriate replacement housing, real estate listings were examined in areas in close proximity to the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2. According to the 2015 American Community Survey, the median home value in Yorkville is $232,500, and according to www.trulia.com the median rent per month for a single family home is $1,595. Listings were obtained for homes with list prices approximately equivalent to the market values of homes which may be displaced ($260,000 and below). The location, type, and cost of a sample of possible replacement housing units in these areas are shown in Tables 8 and 9. The information presented is based on classified advertisements from multiple sources, including Trulia.com and Zillow.com during July 2017. If relocation for displaced residents of the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 is required, there are similar priced single-family homes and rental units available both within the City of Yorkville and in the immediate vicinity. AVAILABILITY OF REPLACEMENT HOUSING DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 HOUSING STUDY | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 7 TABLE 8 | REAL ESTATE FOR SALE NEAR DOWNTOWN TIF DISTRICT #2 Similar Nearby For Sale:City Price # Bedrooms/Baths Type 22 Gawne Ln Yorkville $180,000 3 Bedroom Single-Family Home 19 Maple St Yorkville $164,900 3 Bedroom Single-Family Home 706 Morgan St Yorkville $184,900 3 Bedroom Single-Family Home 502 W Dolph St Yorkville $199,000 3 Bedroom Single-Family Home 703 S Main St Yorkville $235,000 3 Bedroom Single-Family Home 3403 Veronica St Plano $137,300 3 Bedroom Single-Family Home 207 Pleasure Dr #A Yorkville $155,000 4 Bedroom Single-Family Home 2342 Emerald Ln Yorkville $190,095 4 Bedroom Single-Family Home 2203 Ryan Dr Yorkville $219,990 5 Bedroom Single-Family Home 57 Stanfield Dr Plano $169,713 5 Bedroom Single-Family Home TABLE 9 | REAL ESTATE FOR RENT NEAR DOWNTOWN TIF DISTRICT #2 Similar Nearby For Rent:City Rent # Bedrooms/Baths Type 302 E Kendall Dr Yorkville $1,710 3 Bedroom Apartment 221 Fairhaven Dr #00 Yorkville $1,985 3 Bedroom Multi-Family Home 4201 Foli St Plano $1,795 3 Bedroom Single-Family Home 1386 Carolyn Ct Yorkville $1,695 3 Bedroom Single-Family Home 477 E Barberry Cir Yorkville $1,850 4 Bedroom Single-Family Home 1393 Carolyn Ct #C Yorkville $1,595 2 Bedroom Townhome 3821 Bailey Rd #336010 Yorkville $1,695 3 Bedroom Townhome 302 Morgan St Yorkville $1,550 3 Bedroom Townhome 3935 Havenhill Ct Yorkville $1,695 3 Bedroom Townhome 3821 Bailey Rd Yorkville $1,695 3 Bedroom Townhome CITY’S PLANS FOR RELOCATION ASSISTANCE AND TYPE AND EXTENT OF RELOCATION ASSISTANCE The TIF Act allows the City of Yorkville to provide relocation assistance to residents displaced by the Redevelopment Plan. The City plans on providing relocation assistance to those individuals who qualify under the TIF Act. As stated, the City will utilize guidelines from the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (URA) and other federal guidelines as the basis for its relocation assistance where appropriate. In addition, to the extent that any removal or displacement will affect households of low-income and very low income persons, the City will provide affordable housing and relocation assistance not less than that which would be provided under the URA and the regulations thereunder, including the eligibility criteria. Affordable housing may either be existing or newly constructed housing and the City shall make a good faith effort to ensure that the affordable housing is located in or near the Project Area. For the purposes of this Housing Impact Study, “low-income households”, “very low-income households”, and “affordable housing” shall have the meanings set forth in the Illinois Affordable Housing Act. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 HOUSING STUDY | DECEMBER 1, 2017 PAGE 8 As of the date of this Redevelopment Plan, these statutory terms have the following meaning: (i) “low-income household” means a single person, family or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is more than 50 percent but less than 80 percent of the median income of the area of residence, adjusted for family size, as such adjusted income and median income are determined from time to time by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) for purposes of Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (“Section 8”); (ii) “very low-income household” means a single person, family, or unrelated persons living together whose adjusted income is not more than 50 percent of the median income of the area of residence, adjusted for family size, as so determined by HUD for the purposes of Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937; and (iii) “affordable housing” means residential housing that, so long as the same is occupied by low-income households or very low-income households, requires payment of monthly housing costs, including utilities other than telephone, of no more than 30 percent of the maximum allowable income for such households, as applicable. Ordinance No. 2018-___ Page 1 Ordinance No. 2018-______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, DESIGNATING THE PROPOSED UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 PURSUANT TO THE TAX INCREMENT ALLOCATION REDEVELOPMENT ACT WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the best interests of the citizens of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”), for the City to implement tax increment allocation financing pursuant to the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, as amended, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1, et seq. (the “TIF Act”), for a Redevelopment Plan and Project as set forth in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Redevelopment Plan (the “Plan”) within the municipal boundaries of the City and within a proposed redevelopment project area (the “Project Area”), described in Section 1 of this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council of the City (collectively, the “Corporate Authorities”) have heretofore by ordinance adopted and approved the Plan, which Plan was identified in such ordinance and was the subject, along with the Project Area designation hereinafter made, of a public hearing held on the 13th day of March, 2018, at the United City of Yorkville, City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, and it is now necessary and desirable to designate the Project Area as a “redevelopment project area” pursuant to the TIF Act. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. Area Designated. The Project Area, as described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set out in full by this reference, is hereby designated as a Ordinance No. 2018-___ Page 2 redevelopment project area pursuant to Section 11-74.4-4 of the TIF Act. The map of the Project Area showing the street location is depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set out in full by this reference. Section 2. Determination of Total Initial Equalized Assessed Valuation; Parcel Identification Numbers Identified. It is hereby expressly found and determined that the year the County Clerk of Kendall County (the “County Clerk”), shall use for determining the total initial equalized assessed valuation of the Project Area is 2016. It is further hereby expressly found and determined that the list of the parcel tax identification numbers for each parcel of property included in the Project Area, described in Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein, is a true, correct, and complete list of said numbers for said parcels of property. Section 3. Transmittal to County Clerk. The City Clerk is hereby expressly directed to transmit to the County Clerk a certified copy of this Ordinance, which includes a legal description of the Project Area, a map of the Project Area, identification of the year that the County Clerk shall use for determining the total initial equalized assessed value of the Project Area, and a list of the parcel tax identification numbers for each parcel property included in the Project Area. Section 4. Invalidity of Any Section. If any section, paragraph, or provision of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. Section 5. Superseder and Effective Date. All ordinances, resolutions, motions, or orders in conflict with this Ordinance are repealed to the extent of such conflict, and this Ordinance No. 2018-___ Page 3 Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage by the Corporate Authorities and approval as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this _______ day of _________________, 2018. ______________________________ CITY CLERK CARLO COLOSIMO ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ ARDEN JOE PLOCHER ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ SEAVER TARULIS ________ ALEX HERNANDEZ ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this _______ day of _________________, 2018. ______________________________ MAYOR Attest: ___________________________________ CITY CLERK Ordinance No. 2018-___ Page 4 Exhibit A DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF SECTIONS 32 AND 33, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 83 IN KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF DYDYNA COURT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF BENJAMIN STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 5 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5 TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 86 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 86 TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 12 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12 TO THE WEST LINE OF TOMASIK COURT; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY MOST CORNER OF LOT 17 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 27 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 27 TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BENJAMIN STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BENJAMIN STREET TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 29 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 29 TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 84 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 84 TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 84; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF THE COMMONWEALTH EDISON RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF VAN EMMON STREET ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID VAN EMMON STREET ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID VAN EMMON STREET ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND SAID WEST LINE EXTENDED NORTH, TO THE NORTH LINE OF VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID VAN EMMON STREET TO THE WEST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED JULY 3, 1990, AS DOCUMENT 904281; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 12 IN SECTION 33, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED ON PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 96; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ILLINOIS RAILNET RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-156-016; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF SAID EAST LINE AND THE EAST LINES OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHERLY MOST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-156-017; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL AND SAID WEST LINE EXTENDED TO THE NORTH LINE OF HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET AND THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 4 IN TER-JAC SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN SAID TER-JAC SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 6 FEET OF LOT I IN SAID TER-JAC SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF HEUSTIS STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF EAST VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN TRUSTEE’S DEED DATED JANUARY 23, 2002 AND RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 200200002291; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF HEUSTIS STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE, EXTENDED NORTH, OF THE 20’ ALLEY RUNNING THROUGH BLOCK SIX OF BLACKS ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE EXTENDED NORTH AND SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN THE OLD SECOND NATIONAL BANK BRIDGE STREET SUBDIVISION; THENCE FOLLOWING A CLOCKWISE DIRECTION AROUND THE PERIMETER OF SAID LOT 2 TO THE EAST LINE OF ROUTE 47; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO A BEND POINT IN SAID SOUTH LINE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG A WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BELL STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF BELL STREET AND THE WEST LINE OF BELL STREET EXTENDED SOUTH TO THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST FOX STREET; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE, TO THE WEST LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL TWO, DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 25, 2003 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 200300025623; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID SOUTH LINE AND ON THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 1, 2010 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 201000002076 TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 11 IN THE ORIGINAL VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE AND ON THE WEST LINE OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 11 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN SAID BLOCK 11; THENCE EASTERLY, ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE WEST LINE OF AFORESAID PARCEL TWO, DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 25, 2003 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 200300025623; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST FOX STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 14 IN THE ORIGINAL VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE; THENCE EASTERLY, ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7, 30 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7 AND ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 6 IN SAID BLOCK 14 TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL WITH A PIN OF 02-32-429-002 AND OWNED BY THE COUNTY OF KENDALL; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VACATED RIDGE STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID VACATED RIDGE STREET TO THE EAST LINE OF VACATED JEFFERSON STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1995 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 9506986; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE, SAID LINE BEING THE CENTERLINE OF VACATED MADISON STREET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL, BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL, BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE, TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID WEST LINE TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 28 IN SAID ORIGINAL VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 5 AND 6 IN SAID BLOCK 28, 125 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 3 IN SAID BLOCK; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID EAST LINE AND ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 4, 100 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 5 AND 6 IN SAID BLOCK 28 TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 1 IN BLACKS ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 6, 12, 11 AND 10 IN SAID BLOCK 1 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 10; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID SOUTH LINE AND ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 2 IN SAID BLOCK 1 TO THE WEST LINE OF ROUTE 47; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF WEST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF MORGAN STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION TO THE NORTH LINE OF WEST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF MORGAN STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID MORGAN STREET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF VACATED VAN EMMON STREET. THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 24 IN BLACKS SECOND ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 143 FEET OF LOTS 3 AND 4 IN SAID BLOCK 24; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE AND ON THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF SAID WEST LINE, TO THE NORTH LINE OF WEST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE, TO THE EAST LINE OF WHITE OAK FARM UNIT 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID EAST LINE, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL TWO, DESCRIBED IN TRUSTEES DEED RECORDED MARCH 5, 2004 AS DOCUMENT 200400005336; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF PARCEL 3, DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED, RECORDED OCTOBER 11, 2012 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 201200019862; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE, 100 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF MADISON STREET; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK 23 IN BLACKS SECOND ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF VACATED MADISON STREET; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 21 IN SAID BLACKS SECOND ADDITION; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST MADISON STREET; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTH MAIN STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST WASHINGTON STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST WASHINGTON STREET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 10 FEET OF LOT 10 IN BLOCK 5 OF MASON’S ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF YORKVILLE, EXTENDED SOUTH; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE EXTENDED AND SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK 5; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND THE SOUTH LINES OF LOTS 2, 3 AND 4 IN SAID BLOCK 5 TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND SAID EAST LINE EXTENDED NORTH TO THE NORTH LINE OF EAST FOX STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-301-011; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND THE EAST LINE OF THE FOLLOWING 2 P.I.N.’S 02-33-301-008 AND 02-33-301-013 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN THE OLD SECOND NATIONAL BANK BRIDGE STREET SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-301-004; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND SAID SOUTH LINE EXTENDED EAST, TO THE EAST LINE OF HEUSTIS STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-304-005; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-304-014; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET; THENCE EASTERLY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILL STREET AND EAST RIDGE STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF MILL STREET TO THE NORTH LINE OF PRICE’S FIRST ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PRICE’S FIRST ADDITION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO AN OLD CLAIM LINE DESCRIBED IN QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED JULY 6, 1988 AS DOCUMENT 883256; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID OLD CLAIM LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE COMMONWEALTH EDISON RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Ordinance No. 2018-___ Page 5 Exhibit B Mill StB e n j a m i n S t W Fox St State StDeer StHeustis StE Fox St E Van Emmon St Beaver St W Ridge St Morgan StE Orange St Adrian StW Madison St Blaine St Elizabeth St Colonial Pkwy W River St Badger StE Washington St Garden St Illini Dr Wolf St Crooked Creek DrAdams StGawne Ln W Van Emmon St W Orange St Wooden Bridge DrWalsh DrOlsen St Walter St E Barberry CirE Hydraulic Ave Wood Sage AveE Ridge St Worsley StDydyna CtW Hydraulic Ave Garden CirW Dolph St Bator StCornersto n e D r W Was hi n gt o n St W Beecher St Rodak St Buhrma st er Ct Illini CtState StMorgan StW Hydraulic Ave S Main StW Dolph St W Washington St S Bridge StS Bridge StSc h o o l h o u s e R d Sc h o o l h o u s e R d 47 126 Fox River LEGEND Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Boundary Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Parcels N All map data provided by the City of Yorkville Community Development Department. October 2017. LEGEND Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #1 Boundary Parcels Added From Project Area #1 into Project Area #2 N All map data provided by the City of Yorkville Community Development Department. October 2017. Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Boundary Remaining Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #1 Parcels Additional Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Parcels Ordinance No. 2018-___ Page 6 Exhibit C DOWNOTWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 PIN LIST 02-32-252-001 02-32-292-002 02-33-307-016 02-32-252-003 02-32-429-001 02-33-307-018 02-32-252-004 02-32-429-002 02-33-307-020 02-32-252-005 02-32-429-003 02-33-307-021 02-32-252-006 02-32-429-009 02-33-307-022 02-32-252-008 02-32-429-010 02-33-326-008 02-32-252-010 02-32-433-001 02-32-280-004 02-32-252-011 02-32-433-002 02-32-280-005 02-32-253-001 02-32-433-003 02-32-280-006 02-32-253-002 02-32-433-004 02-32-280-007 02-32-253-003 02-32-433-005 02-32-280-008 02-32-253-004 02-32-433-008 02-32-280-009 02-32-280-002 02-32-433-009 02-33-154-013 02-32-280-003 02-32-433-011 02-33-154-014 02-32-280-010 02-32-433-013 02-33-154-018 02-32-280-011 02-32-434-004 02-33-326-004 02-32-280-012 02-32-434-005 02-33-377-001 02-32-280-013 02-33-154-009 02-33-377-007 02-32-280-014 02-33-154-015 02-33-377-008 02-32-280-015 02-33-154-019 02-33-377-009 02-32-280-016 02-33-154-020 02-33-377-020 02-32-281-001 02-33-154-022 02-33-377-021 02-32-281-002 02-33-154-023 02-33-377-022 02-32-281-003 02-33-156-004 02-33-377-023 02-32-281-006 02-33-156-005 02-33-377-024 02-32-281-007 02-33-156-006 02-33-377-034 02-32-282-001 02-33-156-007 02-33-377-033 02-32-282-003 02-33-156-008 05-04-127-001 02-32-282-004 02-33-156-009 05-04-127-002 02-32-282-005 02-33-156-014 05-04-127-003 02-32-282-006 02-33-156-018 05-04-127-004 02-32-283-001 02-33-157-007 05-04-131-001 02-32-283-002 02-33-157-008 05-04-131-002 02-32-283-003 02-33-158-004 05-04-131-003 02-32-283-004 02-33-177-001 05-04-130-004 02-32-284-001 02-33-177-002 05-04-130-003 02-32-284-002 02-33-177-013 05-04-130-002 02-32-284-003 02-33-178-001 05-04-130-001 02-32-284-004 02-33-301-002 05-04-129-001 02-32-284-005 02-33-301-003 05-04-129-002 02-32-284-006 02-33-301-004 05-04-129-003 02-32-285-001 02-33-301-008 05-04-129-004 02-32-285-002 02-33-301-011 05-04-129-005 02-32-285-003 02-33-301-013 05-04-129-006 02-32-285-004 02-33-301-015 05-04-129-007 02-32-286-001 02-33-302-017 05-04-129-008 02-32-286-002 02-33-302-021 05-04-129-009 02-32-286-003 02-33-304-004 05-04-128-001 02-32-286-004 02-33-304-005 05-04-128-002 02-32-286-005 02-33-304-019 05-04-128-003 02-32-287-001 02-33-304-020 05-04-128-004 02-32-287-005 02-33-307-002 05-04-128-005 02-32-287-007 02-33-307-003 05-04-128-006 02-32-287-008 02-33-307-004 05-04-128-007 02-32-291-001 02-33-307-005 05-04-128-008 DOWNOTWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 PIN LIST 02-32-291-002 02-33-307-014 05-04-128-009 Ordinance No. 2018-___ Page 1 Ordinance No. 2018-______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ADOPTING TAX INCREMENT ALLOCATION FINANCING FOR THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the best interests of the citizens of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”), for the City to adopt tax increment allocation financing pursuant to the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, as amended, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1, et seq. (the “TIF Act”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the TIF Act, the Mayor and City Council of the City (collectively, the “Corporate Authorities”) have heretofore approved the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Redevelopment Plan (the “Plan”) for the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 (the “Project Area”) as required by the TIF Act by passage of an ordinance and have heretofore designated the Project Area as required by the TIF Act by passage of an ordinance and have otherwise complied with all other conditions precedent required by the TIF Act. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. Tax Increment Adoption. The TIF Act is hereby adopted to pay redevelopment project costs, as defined in the TIF Act and as set forth in the Plan, within the Project Area, as legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein. The map of the Project Area showing the street location is depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set out in full by this reference. Ordinance No. 2018-___ Page 2 Section 2. Allocation of Ad Valorem Taxes. Pursuant to the TIF Act, the ad valorem taxes, if any, arising from the levies upon taxable real property in the Project Area by taxing districts and tax rates determined in the manner provided in Section 11-74.4-9(c) of the TIF Act each year after the effective date of this Ordinance until the Plan costs and obligations issued in respect thereto have been paid, shall be divided as follows: (a) That portion of taxes levied upon each taxable lot, block, tract, or parcel of real property which is attributable to the lower of the current equalized assessed value or the initial equalized assessed value of each such taxable lot, block, tract, or parcel of real property in the Project Area, shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid by the county collector to the respective affected taxing districts, in the manner required by law in the absence of the adoption of tax increment allocation financing. (b) That portion, if any, of such taxes which is attributable to the increase in the current equalized assessed valuation of each lot, block, tract, or parcel of real property in the Project Area over and above the initial equalized assessed value of each property in the Project Area, shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid to the municipal treasurer or to his designee, pursuant to Section 207A of the Revenue Act of 1939 of the State of Illinois, as amended, who shall deposit said taxes into a special fund, hereby created, and designated the “Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Special Tax Allocation Fund” of the City, and such taxes shall be used for the purpose of paying Project costs and obligations incurred in the payment thereof. Ordinance No. 2018-___ Page 3 Section 3. Invalidity of Any Section. If any section, paragraph, or provision of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. Section 4. Superseder and Effective Date. All ordinances, resolutions, motions, or orders in conflict with this Ordinance are repealed to the extent of such conflict, and this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage by the Corporate Authorities and approval as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this _________ day of _________________, 2018. ______________________________ CITY CLERK CARLO COLOSIMO ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ ARDEN JOE PLOCHER ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ SEAVER TARULIS ________ ALEX HERNANDEZ ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this _________ day of _________________, 2018. ______________________________ MAYOR Attest: ___________________________________ CITY CLERK Ordinance No. 2018-___ Page 4 Exhibit A DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA #2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF SECTIONS 32 AND 33, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 83 IN KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF DYDYNA COURT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF BENJAMIN STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 5 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID LOT 5 TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 86 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 86 TO THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 12 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12 TO THE WEST LINE OF TOMASIK COURT; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY MOST CORNER OF LOT 17 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 17 TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 27 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 27 TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BENJAMIN STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BENJAMIN STREET TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 29 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 29 TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 84 IN SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 84 TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 84; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF THE COMMONWEALTH EDISON RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF VAN EMMON STREET ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID VAN EMMON STREET ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID VAN EMMON STREET ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND SAID WEST LINE EXTENDED NORTH, TO THE NORTH LINE OF VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID VAN EMMON STREET TO THE WEST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED JULY 3, 1990, AS DOCUMENT 904281; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 12 IN SECTION 33, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED ON PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 96; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE ILLINOIS RAILNET RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-156-016; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF SAID EAST LINE AND THE EAST LINES OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHERLY MOST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-156-017; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL AND SAID WEST LINE EXTENDED TO THE NORTH LINE OF HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET AND THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 4 IN TER-JAC SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN SAID TER-JAC SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 6 FEET OF LOT I IN SAID TER-JAC SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF HEUSTIS STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF EAST VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN TRUSTEE’S DEED DATED JANUARY 23, 2002 AND RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 200200002291; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF HEUSTIS STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID EAST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE, EXTENDED NORTH, OF THE 20’ ALLEY RUNNING THROUGH BLOCK SIX OF BLACKS ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE EXTENDED NORTH AND SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN THE OLD SECOND NATIONAL BANK BRIDGE STREET SUBDIVISION; THENCE FOLLOWING A CLOCKWISE DIRECTION AROUND THE PERIMETER OF SAID LOT 2 TO THE EAST LINE OF ROUTE 47; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO A BEND POINT IN SAID SOUTH LINE; THENCE SOUTH ALONG A WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BELL STREET; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF BELL STREET AND THE WEST LINE OF BELL STREET EXTENDED SOUTH TO THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST FOX STREET; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE, TO THE WEST LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL TWO, DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 25, 2003 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 200300025623; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID SOUTH LINE AND ON THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 1, 2010 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 201000002076 TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 11 IN THE ORIGINAL VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE AND ON THE WEST LINE OF LOT 4 IN SAID BLOCK 11 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN SAID BLOCK 11; THENCE EASTERLY, ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE WEST LINE OF AFORESAID PARCEL TWO, DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 25, 2003 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 200300025623; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST FOX STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EASTERLY 30 FEET OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 14 IN THE ORIGINAL VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE; THENCE EASTERLY, ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 7, 30 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7 AND ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 6 IN SAID BLOCK 14 TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL WITH A PIN OF 02-32-429-002 AND OWNED BY THE COUNTY OF KENDALL; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VACATED RIDGE STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID VACATED RIDGE STREET TO THE EAST LINE OF VACATED JEFFERSON STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1995 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 9506986; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE, SAID LINE BEING THE CENTERLINE OF VACATED MADISON STREET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL, BEING ALSO THE WEST LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL, BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF VAN EMMON STREET; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE, TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID WEST LINE TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 28 IN SAID ORIGINAL VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 5 AND 6 IN SAID BLOCK 28, 125 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 3 IN SAID BLOCK; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID EAST LINE AND ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 4, 100 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOTS 5 AND 6 IN SAID BLOCK 28 TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 6 IN BLOCK 1 IN BLACKS ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 6, 12, 11 AND 10 IN SAID BLOCK 1 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 10; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID SOUTH LINE AND ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF LOT 2 IN SAID BLOCK 1 TO THE WEST LINE OF ROUTE 47; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF WEST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF MORGAN STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION TO THE NORTH LINE OF WEST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF MORGAN STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID MORGAN STREET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF VACATED VAN EMMON STREET. THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 2 IN BLOCK 24 IN BLACKS SECOND ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHERLY 143 FEET OF LOTS 3 AND 4 IN SAID BLOCK 24; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE AND ON THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF SAID WEST LINE, TO THE NORTH LINE OF WEST HYDRAULIC AVENUE; THENCE WESTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE, TO THE EAST LINE OF WHITE OAK FARM UNIT 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID EAST LINE, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL TWO, DESCRIBED IN TRUSTEES DEED RECORDED MARCH 5, 2004 AS DOCUMENT 200400005336; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF PARCEL 3, DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED, RECORDED OCTOBER 11, 2012 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 201200019862; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE, 100 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF MADISON STREET; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION TO THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK 23 IN BLACKS SECOND ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY, ON SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF VACATED MADISON STREET; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 7 IN BLOCK 21 IN SAID BLACKS SECOND ADDITION; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST MADISON STREET; THENCE EASTERLY, ON SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTH MAIN STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ON SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF WEST WASHINGTON STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST WASHINGTON STREET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 10 FEET OF LOT 10 IN BLOCK 5 OF MASON’S ADDITION TO THE TOWN OF YORKVILLE, EXTENDED SOUTH; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE EXTENDED AND SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 5 IN SAID BLOCK 5; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND THE SOUTH LINES OF LOTS 2, 3 AND 4 IN SAID BLOCK 5 TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND SAID EAST LINE EXTENDED NORTH TO THE NORTH LINE OF EAST FOX STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-301-011; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND THE EAST LINE OF THE FOLLOWING 2 P.I.N.’S 02-33-301-008 AND 02-33-301-013 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 IN THE OLD SECOND NATIONAL BANK BRIDGE STREET SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-301-004; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND SAID SOUTH LINE EXTENDED EAST, TO THE EAST LINE OF HEUSTIS STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-304-005; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND WITH A P.I.N. OF 02-33-304-014; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF MILL STREET; THENCE EASTERLY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILL STREET AND EAST RIDGE STREET; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF MILL STREET TO THE NORTH LINE OF PRICE’S FIRST ADDITION TO YORKVILLE; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PRICE’S FIRST ADDITION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO AN OLD CLAIM LINE DESCRIBED IN QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED JULY 6, 1988 AS DOCUMENT 883256; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID OLD CLAIM LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE COMMONWEALTH EDISON RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID KENDALLWOOD ESTATES; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Ordinance No. 2018-___ Page 5 Exhibit B Mill StB e n j a m i n S t W Fox St State StDeer StHeustis StE Fox St E Van Emmon St Beaver St W Ridge St Morgan StE Orange St Adrian StW Madison St Blaine St Elizabeth St Colonial Pkwy W River St Badger StE Washington St Garden St Illini Dr Wolf St Crooked Creek DrAdams StGawne Ln W Van Emmon St W Orange St Wooden Bridge DrWalsh DrOlsen St Walter St E Barberry CirE Hydraulic Ave Wood Sage AveE Ridge St Worsley StDydyna CtW Hydraulic Ave Garden CirW Dolph St Bator StCornersto n e D r W Was hi n gt o n St W Beecher St Rodak St Buhrma st er Ct Illini CtState StMorgan StW Hydraulic Ave S Main StW Dolph St W Washington St S Bridge StS Bridge StSc h o o l h o u s e R d Sc h o o l h o u s e R d 47 126 Fox River LEGEND Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Boundary Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Parcels N All map data provided by the City of Yorkville Community Development Department. October 2017. LEGEND Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #1 Boundary Parcels Added From Project Area #1 into Project Area #2 N All map data provided by the City of Yorkville Community Development Department. October 2017. Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Boundary Remaining Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #1 Parcels Additional Downtown Redevelopment Project Area #2 Parcels Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Previously discussed at the Economic Development Committee on February 6, 2018. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #10 Tracking Number EDC 2018-32 UPDATE: Manufacturing and Industrial City Council Goal Action Plan Economic Development Committee – April 3, 2018 N/A N/A N/A See Memo. Erin Willrett Administration Name Department Summary Review of staff proposals for action plans related to the City Council’s highest priority goal, Manufacturing and Industrial development. Update At the February 6, 2018 Economic Development Committee received the below update on the Manufacturing and Industrial City Council Goal along with an Action Plans. There has been an update since that meeting regarding the BNSF Site Certification process. The update is summarized below. Staff had a conference call with the Manager of Economic Development of BNSF, who is also the Manager of the Site Certification Program. She reviewed the items that BNSF considers important for Certification, which include level of readiness, availability of rail, size and location. Once selected, BNSF conducts an in-depth review of the sites to determine if they meet the readiness standards, which are intended to minimize development risks and increase speed to market. Some of the key requirements for the site certification program include:  Documentation of site ownership  Commitment of site availability  Detailed description of site and survey by qualified professional  Letters from utility providers summarizing their capability to provide industrial services  Report that delineates all bodies of water on and near site  Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment  Cultural report/study  Endangered Species study to determine presence of any animal or plant species designated as endangered or threatened under US and state laws  Rail and Road access Of those items listed above, there are two hurdles to this certification that staff was unaware of until the conference call. 1. The program is eligible for property owners. The City must own the site or the property owner must be the primary applicant. 2. The property must have a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment completed. Because of the significant undertaking and/or costs of both of the large hurdles, staff is recommending pivoting the BNSF Certification process. Instead of the City being the applicant, staff will work with the property owners of the parcels to educate them on the benefit of the certification process. Staff will Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: April 3, 2018 Subject: UPDATE - Manufacturing and Industrial City Council Goal Action Plan assist the property owner(s) with the application process and studies that would need to be completed prior to submittal. Thus the redesigned action plan for the BNSF Site Certification is: a. Continue with information gathering on the BNSF Site Certification Process. The next steps include meeting with BNSF Officials, and then Wrigley and Lincoln Prairie representatives to educate them about the benefits of the program and steps for which the City can assist. Provided both landowners are supportive of the program, the site certification process takes 1-2 years to complete. Recommendation Staff is requesting feedback on the amended action plan. Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #11 Tracking Number EDC 2018-33 Goal 1 – Manufacturing and Industrial Action Plan - YBSD Economic Development Committee - April 3, 2018 N/A Discussion will take place at the meeting. Bart Olson Administration Name Department