The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Minutes 2003 05-27-03 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY. ILLINOIS, HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 800 GAME FARM ROAD, ON TUESDAY, MAY 27.2003. Mayor Prochaska called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Clerk Milschewski called the roll. Ward I James Present Sticka Present Ward II Burd Present Kot Present Ward III Munns Present Ohare Present Ward IV Besco Absent Spears Present Also present: City Clerk Milschewski, City Treasurer Powell, City Administrator Graff, City Attorney Kelly Kramer, Police Chief Harold Martin, Director of Public Works Dhuse, Executive Director of Parks & Recreation Brown and Finance Director Traci Pleckham. OUORUM A quorum was established INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS Mayor Prochaska welcomed guests and asked those present to enter their name on the attendance sheet provided. _ AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA None. COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Public Works Committee 6:30 P.M., Monday, June 23, 2003 City of Yorkville Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road Economic Development Committee 7:00 P.M., Thursday, June 19, 2003 City of Yorkville Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road Administration Committee 6:30 P.M., Thursday, June 12, 2003 City of Yorkville Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road Public Safety Committee 6:30 P.M., Thursday June 26, 2003 City of Yorkville Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road PRESENTATIONS AAIM DUI Awards Mayor Prochaska presented United City of Yorkville Police Officers Dan Pleckham, Sam Stroup — and Barry Groesch with Certificates of Appreciation from the Alliance Against Intoxicated Motorist (AAIM) for outstanding service in DUI (driving under the influence) enforcement. CITIZEN COMMENTS Helen Drew Mitchler of 7542 Route 34 West addressed the City Council with concerns about the Grande Reserve development. The following answers were provided for Mrs. Mitchler's questions (see attached): • Mayor Prochaska explained that he was not sure who the current owner of the property was because there are contracts for the property which may not have closed yet. He explained that this process is not uncommon. • The property is currently unincorporated. • Moser Enterprise petitioned the United City of Yorkville for annexation. i The Minutes of the ReLyular Meeting of the Citv Council - Mav 27.2003 - Daze 2 • If the United City of Yorkville denies the annexation the developer could petition Kendall County or another community. If the development stays in the County it would be unincorporated. • Construction is estimated to begin in spring of 2004. • Wells are contingent on permits from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) and as long as they are approved, they can be dug. They will be dug at the developers risk if the annexation is not signed at the time they begin digging. The wells - shouldn't affect the water table or springs but Administrator Graff suggested that Mrs. Mitchler discuss this with the developer's engineers. • Mayor Prochaska explained that the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) is beginning their Phase I engineering of Route 34 from Route 47 to Orchard Road. When this is finished they will immediately go into Phase H engineering. Currently there isn't a date for construction. Administrator Graff explained that annexation agreement requires that Bristol -Ridge Road, Kennedy Road, etc. are widened however this will be determined by the phasing of the development. Also, there will be traffic signals placed at five intersections. • It was clarified that eight City Council members would be voting on the annexation. • The development does not have to be approved by the County but the County has been in discussion regarding the roads. Robert Mitchler of 7542 Route 34 West addressed the Council. He explained that he has been a precinct committee member since 1954 and he has been receiving calls regarding the development. He stated that the main concern people have is for the density of the development. He asked the Council to consider the lot sizes being requested by the developer and cited Blackberry Oaks and White Oaks subdivisions as positive examples of areas with large lots. He stated that another concern was the roads and traffic. Property owners are concerned that easements will be taken from them instead of the developer to widen the roads. Mayor Prochaska suggested that concerned residents contact the state and IDOT with their concerns since they are currently engineering the widening of Route 34. The widening will take place whether or not the development goes through. Mr. Mitchler also expressed concerns with open burning allowed in the County and its affects on the new homes. He stated that he was not addressing the Council to complain but to bring resident's concerns to the attention of the Council. Glenna Patterson of 2625 Kennedy Road addressed the Council. She stated that her concerns are similar to the Mitchler's but her main concern was if she would lose property if Kennedy Road is widened. Mayor Prochaska explained that if the City annexes the Moser property, the City annexes to the far side of the right -of -way so that the whole street becomes the City's responsibility. Administrator Graff noted that according to the engineering plans, no right -of -way will be taken from any of the existing homes on Kennedy road. The right -of -way will be taken from The Grande Reserve. George Patterson of 2625 Kennedy Road asked if the developer would follow the whole project through to the end. Mayor Prochaska explained that the developer places funds into Letters of Credit with the City which are held until certain things on a punch list are completed properly. This ensures that the developer doesn't walk away until the development is finished. PUBLIC HEARINGS PC 2002 -16 Menard's Residential Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to go into public hearing for PC 2002 -16 Menard's Residential: Menard, Inc., petitioner, requests to annex to the United City of Yorkville and rezone from Kendall County A -1 Agricultural to United City of Yorkville R -2 Planned Unit Development and for hearing as to the Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement of petitioner. The real property consists of approximately 142 acres and is located on the south side of Kennedy Road, approximately 1,300' east of Route 47, Bristol Township, Kendall County, -- Illinois. So moved by Alderwoman Spears; seconded by Alderman Munns. I . Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays -0 Ohare -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye Please see attached Report of Proceedings taken before Nicola Gengler, C.S.R. from Depo Court Reporting Service for the transcription of the public hearing. Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to close the public hearing. So moved by Alderman Sticka; seconded by Alderwoman Spears. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays -0 Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Ohare -aye The Minutes of the Regular Meetine of the Citv Council - Mav 27.2003 - Dase 3 CONSENT AGENDA 1. Bruell Street Pump Station — Walter E. Deuchler Associates Design Engineering Agreement — in an amount not to exceed $294, 000.00 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute 2. Policy for Naming City Parks 3. Building Permit Reports for March 2003 and April 2003 4. Resolution 2003 -19 - Authorizing Treasurer William Powell to Sign Checks on Behalf of the United City of Yorkville — authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute 5. Resolution 2003 -20 - Authorizing Alderman Ohare to Sign Checks on Behalf of the United City of Yorkville — authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented. So moved by Alderman Sticka; seconded by Alderman Munns. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays -0 Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Ohare -aye PLANNING COMMISSION /ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL None. MINUTES FOR APPROVAL A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting from April 29, 2003 and May 13, 2003: seconded by Alderwoman Burd. Motion approved by a viva voce vote. A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to approve the minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting from April 2, 2003: seconded by Alderwoman Burd. Alderwoman Spears noted a correction needed on page 8, second paragraph, fourth line should read "However, Montgomery officials have indicated.... " The word "don't" should be removed. The minutes were approved as corrected. Motion approved by a viva voce vote. BILLS FOR APPROVAL Alderwoman Spears clarified that one portion of checks was coming out of the fiscal year 02/03 budget and the other out of the fiscal year 03/04 budget. i A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to approve the paying of the bills listed on the Detailed Board Reports dated May 22, 2003 and May 23, 2003 totaling the following amounts: checks in the amount of $597,243.72 (vendor for fiscal year 02/03), $87,747.47 (vender for fiscal year 03/03) for a total of $684,991.19; seconded by Alderman James. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays -0 Burd -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Ohare -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Ohare -aye REPORTS - MAYOR'S REPORT Proclamation for Relay for Life, June 6tb — June 7tb Mayor Prochaska read a proclamation declaring June 6` and 7' "Relay for Life Days ". See attached. Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to ratify the proclamation. So moved by Alderman Sticka; seconded by Alderman Kot. Motion approved by a viva voce vote. Mayor Prochaska noted that he has a team participating in the "Relay for Life ". He stated that he had a few openings on the team if anyone was interested in joining him and also donations are welcome. I I The Minutes of the Regular Meetine of the Citv Council - Mav 27, 2003 - page 4 Pork Chop Dinner Mayor Prochaska reported that the Citizens Police Academy Alumni are holding their annual Pork Chop Dinner on May 29, 2003 from 4:30 to 7:30. Dinners are $8.00 /person and this is the main fund raiser for the group. Grande Reserve Letters Mayor Prochaska reported that he received two letters regarding the Grande Reserve Subdivision. He read letters from Lois Seaton and Jessica Lee. Please see attached. Mayor Prochaska commented that the Council would take all comments into considerations. He noted that the issue of parks was addressed in Ms. Seaton's letter and he noted that the Youth Baseball had to turn children away due to the lack of baseball fields. He wondered if several residents would be willing to put their yards together to form a baseball diamond if we are not going to have any parks. Alderman Sticka commented that this is the first time he has heard someone object to the city having parks. ATTORNEY'S REPORT No report. CITY CLERK'S REPORT No report. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT No report. CITY ADMINISTATOR'S REPORT No report. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report. — I DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT Public Works Director Eric Dhuse reported that the areas of street that were affected by water main breaks were saw cut and will be paved soon. Alderwoman Spears asked what could be done about those who put brush out after the pick up because the next one isn't until the end of June. Administrator Graff stated that he would check with the Building Department to verify if this was a violation of the property maintenance standards. CHIEF OF POLICE REPORT No report. I EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION No report. COMMUNITY & LIAISON REPORT Alderman Ohare thanked Chief Martin, Administrator Graff and Bill Dettmer for working to get the grass cut at the abandon house on Freemont Street. COMMITTEE REPORTS PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT PC 2003 -05 Heartland Circle — Final Plat A motion was made by Alderman Sticka to approve PC 2003 -05 Heartland Circle Final Plat, Units 1, 2 and 3, subject to final engineering approval by the City Engineer before the Mayor and City Clerk execute the Final Plat documents; seconded by Alderman James. Alderman Sticka commented that the final plat conforms to the preliminary plat. Administrator Graff stated that City Engineer Joe Wywrot did have a few issues with sewer, water and streets. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council - Mav 27, 2003 - nab I Alderwoman Spears asked if Chief Martin's concerns were going to be addressed and Administrator Graff stated that these would be addressed under the engineering review. i Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays -0 Ohare -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye, Mums -aye - PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS Transmitter Alderman Munns asked Chief Martin if he had any complaints regarding radio problems on Countryside Parkway near Pizza Hut. He stated that he lost his car radio signal in that area and he wondered if there was a transmitter in the area. Chief Martin stated he would check into it. City Administrator Alderman Sticka commented that recently the Council received a copy of a letter criticizing the City Administrator. He stated that his personal view was that Administrator Graff has been very effective in doing his job. He noted that the Administrator has a difficult job and there area lot of different situations happening in the City which he has addressed well. Memorial Day Activities Alderwoman Burd thanked everyone who was involved in the Memorial Day event. She stated that the park looked beautiful, it was a nice event and it was well attended. Mayor Prochaska also thanked the American Legion for the new plaques on the memorial, one for each branch of the service. He also thanked all those who participated. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to adjourn. So moved by Alderwoman Burd; seconded by Alderwoman Spears. Motion approved by a viva voce vote. I Meeting adjourned at 8:45 P.M. Minutes submitted by: JJ Jacquelyn Milschewski, City Clerk City of Yorkville, Illinois I CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 27, 2003 PLEASE PRINT NAME: ADDRESS: Al k n + r ��u� 1 1110 Ju46,I) Lavle � l--i v o &o" "; Go�� -� ESL i�G l �l ��'h � � �� /�,� � !✓I l � _ I , SIGNIN I� YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 27, 2003 REMARKS CONCERNING THE GRANDE RESERVE DEVELOPMENT Mayor Prochaska and Council Members My name is Helen Drew Mitchler My address is 7542 Rt34 West Oswego, IL 60543 -9174 Our home is located half way between Oswego and Yorkville, on Rt34, across from the fields designated for the Grande Reserve Development. I have attended meetings concerning this development, listened to many people that have questions pertaining to some of the problems involved, and wish to bring these to your attention, even though you are aware of them. Let me get some things straight: The property in question, 1,129 acres belongs to who? Was it sold to the Moser Enterprise? Is it unincorporated land now? Did the Moser Enterprise petition to have it annexed into the City of Yorkville? What if you deny the annexation? To whom will Moser petition next? Bristol Township, or the County? If it went to the County, would it be unincorporated? When will construction start on homes? Why are water wells being dug in July? What about the water table and our spring? When will R04, Bristol Ridge Road, Kennedy Road, Mill Road and Galena Road be Widened? How is the gulley on the former Hastert property going to be used? For drainage? Page 2 Yorkville City Council Meeting May 27, 2003 The potential buyers into this development, are being hoodwinked into thinking there Are "major roadways near by, namely Bristol Ridge, Rt34, Kennedy, Mill and Rt 30. How many people are going to vote on approval of this Grande Reserve as proposed? Are the eleven members of the City Council going to decide the fate of hundreds of others living nearby -- changing their live forever. i The meeting at the Beecher Center on April 29` brought all negative feelings to this project. Perhaps these people should proceed with petitions from all the surrounding homes, to oppose it. The council should consider what is at stake! The developers are not trying to improve Kendall County, Bristol Township, or any other area. They found an area on which to make money. Consider the move of an ordinary house down Rt34, from River Heights to Timber Ridge (the Tanner subdivision. Instead of moving a telephone pole on the north side of R04, they cut off half of a 400 year old Oak tree and all the other tree branches along Rt34 to accommodate the house. Do you recall several years ago when the sheriff called a meeting of concerned citizens in regard to complaints of newly arrived people into Kendall County? They complained that they had come here to enjoy "the pristine country air" and were disappointed because of the farmers - -their equipment on the highways and roads, their plowing and work in the fields, some times at night with their lights on, and the smell of manure!! Were they going to try and change that? Do you recall the time that manufactured housing was being proposed along Orchard Road, but was voted down by the Oswego Village. Do you recall the Drag Strip? New people moving into the area, objected to the noise of the drag strip engines on Sunday mornings and wanted the drag strip closed. Consider what the explosion of 8,000 people will do to this area. We all know the impact on the fire district. We all know the impact on the school system. Have you talked to the Yorkville City Library? News items are appearing now about the library district in Round Lake with a 63% increase in visitors, over the same month last year. The Oswego Library is concerned about its ability to serve the increase of visitors - -in 2002 they saw a 16% increase over the previous year, in items circulated. They are very concerned about the ability to serve the community. Page 3 Yorkville City Council May 27, 2003 Do we understand the development is a done -deal? Will it proceed regardless of objections ?. Should not the roads be improved before construction starts? The understanding should be, that land for the widening of the roads should be taken from the developers land. Should not the lot sizes be considered, with the intention of increasing the lot sizes and improving the development into a more desirable addition to Kendall County ?. Other subdivisions have achieved a beautiful look with larger lots and lovely homes. If this development is to be - -then please consider that you represent the people and should listen to the people. Does the city of Yorkville really have to more than double in size? For what reasons? What happened to the Comprehensive Plan for Kendall County? Has the County Board been involved? What is their opinion? Please realize what you are doing to the county and this area, when you vote on this issue. We are depending on you to preserve the soul of this county and what it has meant to the hundreds of people who have lived here and protected it up to this time. Thank you. i ORIGINAL STATE OF ILLINOIS ) SS: COUNTY OF KENDALL ) BEFORE THE YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING PC2002 -16 Menards Residential REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had and testimony taken at the hearing of the above - entitled matter, taken before Nicola Gengler, C.S.R., No. 84 -3780, on May 27, 2003, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., at 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois. i D- 653003 REPO • COURT reporting service 800 West Fifth Avenue • Suite 203C • Naperville, IL 60563 • 630 - 983 -0030 • Fax 630 - 983 -6013 www.depocoui,t.com 2 3 1 PRESENT: 1 (Proceedings were had which 2 MAYOR ARTHUR F. PROCHASKA; 2 are not herein transcribed.) 3 MR. WILLIAM POWELL, City Treasurer; 3 MAYOR PROCHASKA: We are now in public 4 MR. ANION GRAFF, City Administrator; 4 hearing. 5 MS. JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI, City Clerk; 5 Basically this is a public hearing 6 MS. VALERIE BURR, Alderwoman; 6 for the annexation to PUD agreement. 7 MR. PAUL JAMES, Alderman; 7 MS. KRAMER: If anybody is speaking 1 8 MR. LARRY KOT, Alderman; 8 tonight, we will ask they identify themselves; and Art 9 MR. MARTY Mums, Alderman; 9 will be swearing them in. If there are any comments, 10 MS. WANDA OHARE, Alderwoman; 10 we will hear them. 11 MR. RICHARD STICKA, Alderman; 11 MAYOR PROCHASKA: We don't swear them in. 12 MS. ROSE SPEARS, Alderwoman; 12 MS. KRAMER: Okay. First we will let the 13 and 13 petitioner briefly speak and explain the project and 14 LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL J. KRAMER 14 then let anybody from the public speak; and then if the 1107A South Bridge Street 15 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 15 petitioner would like to address some of the comments BY: MS. KELLY KRAMER, 16 appeared on behalf of The United City of 16 of the public, they will feel free to do so or ask the Yorkville. 17 17 public any kind of questions and the public can also 18 - - - 18 ask the petitioner any questions that they may have. 19 19 MAYOR PROCHASKA: What I'd ask is the 20 20 council if they have any questions please wait until 21 21 the end as we normally do. 22 22 MR. BAKER: Yes. If it is okay, I will 23 23 stand over here. 24 24 MAYOR PROCHASKA: State your name for us, DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 i t ' I 4 5 1 please. 1 briefly some of the changes that we have wade over the 2 MR. BAKER: My name is Mark Baker with 2 past year. It is a fairly detailed concept plan that 3 SEC Planning Consultants. I am here tonight with Kevin 3 we actually did the subdivision plotting for the 4 Biscan with Smith Engineering and Gary Kolby with 4 neighborhood. 5 Menards. 5 We are showing townhome cash product i 6 MAYOR PROCHASKA: We are probably going to 6 that is directly behind the retail center to act as a 7 need you to come up or we can move the mic over. We 7 buffer and a transitional use into a detached 8 want to make sure we get all of this on record. 8 single - family product that would fit basically within 9 MR. BAKER: Okay. My name is Mark Baker 9 the City's current R -2 zoning category. 10 with SEC Planning Consultants. I am here tonight with 10 Some of the changes that we have 11 Kevin Biscan of Smith Engineering and Gary Kolby of 11 made over the past year are that we have changed the 12 Menards. We are here before you to present a draft 12 density from the townhomes from initially five units to 13 document for the zoning PUD for Menards Residential 13 the acre to 4.25. We have added additional access 14 located behind the Menards store at Kennedy Road and 14 points to McHugh Road. We have added an access stub to 15 Route 47. 15 the east, an access stub to the south of Hartman Lake; 16 I'd like to start first by talking 16 and we have modified an access point along Kennedy 17 about a little background about where we have been in 17 Road. 18 the past year. We started working on this project 18 So with that said, we feel pretty 19 around January of '02, and we have gone through the 19 comfortable with the fact that we have net with the 20 concept plan stage and met with various boards and 20 Park Board and we have addressed comments. one of the 21 commissions and have revised our concept plan based on 21 other changes we made to the Park Board convents is 22 comments that we have received. 22 initially we had our park land more dispersed centrally 23 I'd like to admit into evidence what 23 in the residential neighborhood, and one of the 24 is labeled as Exhibit E, concept plan, and go over 24 requests was to consolidate that park land into a DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 6 7 1 larger uniformed park. We have done that and now show 1 70 feet to 74 feet; but the actual square footage of 2 a seven -acre park. That is also closer in proximity to 2 those lots is in excess of 12,000 square feet; and on 3 the higher listing product. 3 an overall development standpoint, we average over 4 I'd also like to admit Exhibit B, 4 14,000 square foot per lot. 5 just to describe what we are requesting in the PUD 5 Another variation that we are asking 6 document. Part of the property is within the City and 6 for from the current zoning code is private streets 7 part of it is not, and we are requesting the area that 7 within the townhome area. We are requesting 26 -foot 8 is shown in blue to be rezoned, and the area that is 8 pavement widths with a 48 -foot access easement to allow 9 shown in yellow to be annexed and rezoned as part of a 9 for utilities adjacent to the roads, but to have that 10 PUD. The rezoned area in blue is approximately 10 flexibility to have a private street within the 11 73.7 acres, and the area to be annexed and rezoned is 11 townhomes and narrow right of ways than would be 12 approximately 68.5 acres. 12 allowed for a typical zoning. 13 I'd like to admit Exhibit C labeled 13 I'd like to admit Exhibit H which 14 Exhibit C preliminary plan; and in the process of 14 outlines the requested variations from the current 15 refining the concept plan and in conjunction with 15 zoning code, and I'd like to pass on to Kevin to 16 preparing this PUD, we are also preparing a preliminary 16 explain a little bit about the depth of the detention. 17 plat of the subdivision line; and in the process of 17 We are asking for a variation on the detention depth to 18 doing that, we have identified variances that we would 18 stay consistent with the detention ponds that are 19 like to call out in the PUD; and those variances 19 currently being used for the Menards retail site. 20 include four lots which are smaller than the typical 20 Kevin, if you could please say a 21 width allowed in the R -2 straight zoning category; and 21 couple of words about that. 22 those lots on Exhibit C are called out with a circle; 22 MR. BISCAN: I am Kevin Biscan with Smith 23 and they are Lots 143, 144, 78 and 77. 23 Engineering, and the intent of the Menards Residential 24 Their lot size width vary from 24 subdivision is to expand an existing storm water DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I 8 9 1 management facility that is at Kennedy Road and provide 1 which would be more of a primary monument signage with 2 our storm water storage for the residential development 2 landscaping and the primary identification for the 3 in the area adjacent to that existing basin. 3 community. 4 In order to do that, the existing 4 Then we have a step down from that 5 basin has a depth of six feet. The current subdivision 5 which we are calling neighborhood entry column which is 6 control ordinance only allows for four feet of depth. 6 a scale -down neighborhood entry for the secondary entry 7 In order to be able to match into that, it would have 7 into the property, and they would be a reflection of 8 to go into the six feet at least at the area where we 8 the main monument but a smaller scale, like a column 9 have the two meeting; and that is why we are asking for 9 with a logo inset and landscape it. So that through 10 the variation for that. 10 these other access points throughout, you would know 11 MR. BAKER: There are a series of other 11 that it is a uniform comprehensive neighborhood and 12 exhibits I'd like to just briefly go over to illustrate 12 that it would all tie back together with the same look 13 the intent that we are thinking in terms of landscape 13 and design. 14 and amenities and signage, and I'd like to admit 14 We have also prepared an exhibit to 15 Exhibit G which is called the Signage Location Map, and 15 analyze the landscape areas within the development, and 16 it identifies the areas where we would like to locate 16 I'd like to admit that as Exhibit C -1 labeled 17 identification signage for the new development. 17 Preliminary Landscape Plan; and what we have identified 18 We have a hierarchy of signage 18 on the preliminary landscape plan are the buffers that 19 within this location map; and first of all, we have a 19 we are proposing throughout the development; and those 20 marketing signage that we are calling out that would be 20 include a 25 -foot landscape buffer adjacent to McHugh 21 more of a temporary billboard marketing sign to attract 21 Road which would be on the residential lots and would 22 visitors to be aware of the new subdivision. 22 serve as an access or an easement over those lots to 23 The next sign would be the primary 23 allow for three -foot berms, three to four -foot berm 24 entry which will be located at Kennedy Road and McHugh 24 with landscaping along that corridor. DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 10 11 1 We also currently show on this 1 and one green identifies park land to be dedicated. 2 exhibit a 25 -foot landscape buffer along Kennedy Road 2 Another green identifies the landscape buffers along 3 based on our preliminary plat drawings that we are in 3 Kennedy Road and McHugh Road, and another green 4 the process of preparing. We have analyzed the 4 identifies the detention open space areas, and we have 5 expansion of Kennedy Road and it looks like we are 5 currently calculated the acreage for each of those and 6 going to add an additional 20 feet on to the buffer 6 calculated also the amount of required park land per 7 along McHugh Road. So ultimately it is going to be in 7 the specific land cash ordinance, and this is one of 8 the 40 to 50 -foot width range which is going to allow 8 the areas that we are still negotiating with the park 9 us to put a five to six-foot landscape berm with 9 director on but one of the things that we are 10 plantings. 10 considering is that we receive -- we work out a way 11 I have an additional exhibit that is 11 that we can get credit for facilities for construction 12 labeled Exhibit C -2, Preliminary Landscape Plan, 12 materials that could be dedicated or provided for the 13 Kennedy Road, which illustrates a typical 400 -foot 13 building of park facilities, trails, city facilities, 14 section of landscaping for one of these landscape 14 for the park land. 15 buffers; and it specifies a plant list, typical number 15 We are also working to refine the 16 of plants, from large shade trees to evergreen trees to 16 language in the PUD in terms of the maintenance of the 17 smaller ornamental trees. That will be intermixed with 17 detention and the easement of the park land and how 18 that buffer in conjunction with the berm for the buffer 18 that is transitioned over. 19 along these roadways. 19 With that said, I'd like to pass it 20 The final exhibit I'd like to admit 20 on to Gary Kolby if he has any closing remarks; and I'd 21 is labeled Exhibit J, Common Facilities; and we 21 like to thank you for your time this evening; and I 22 prepared this exhibit to illustrate the variety of 22 look forward to answering any questions you might have 23 canron open space areas that we have throughout the 23 and working with you in the future. 24 development. We have three shades of green on the plan 24 MR. KOLBY: Good evening. I am Gary Kolby DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 12 13 1 with Menards. I don't have anything to add. Mark did 1 I notice you have the single family 2 an excellent job, but I would like to let you know that 2 pretty well laid out, and do you have any renderings so 3 we are glad to be a part of Yorkville and we are glad 3 we have an idea what we are dealing with here? 4 to be a part of the community. 4 MR. BAKER: Mark Baker. Currently what we 5 I am sure you are all aware of the 5 have in some of our preliminary concept plans, we show 6 development that we already have going on around the 6 the site plan for a typical townhome layout. 7 store that is open within the co munity here. We are 7 The reality of the situation is 8 looking forward to continuing this relationship, and we 8 right now we don't have a developer for that product, 9 want to build these houses and get going with that 9 and so there is not a set site plan for it. So we ' I 10 project. 10 don't want to mislead anybody as to what it is. i 11 We are looking at this point for 11 Currently the way the plan is set 12 your support and your input so we can move forward 12 up, the way the PUD is drafted, is that that parcel 13 cohesively with the community. Thank you. 13 stands alone with an entitled number of units; but for 14 MAYOR PROCHASKA: could you bring that back 14 that to be developed, it has to come back before you 15 up here. 15 with a site plan to be reviewed and approved because 16 At this time then, I would open up 16 quite frankly right now we are not sure of what the 17 the floor to anyone that would have any comments or 17 product is actually going to be and what the ultimate 18 questions from the audience, from the development. 18 density is on that property. 19 (No response.) 19 MR. KOT: Even though you are looking to 20 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Is there any cmmients or 20 bring in the whole piece, you are focusing on the 21 questions from the council? 21 single family; right? 22 Larry? 22 MR. BAKER: Right. 23 MR. KOT: Is there some kind of a plan for 23 MS. KRAMER: And that area there that is 24 the townhomes that we could look at? 24 the R -3 residential district is already annexed into DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 14 15 1 Yorkville. So they are just seeking rezoning whereas 1 cash ordinance for the seven -acre park on the 2 the single family is an annexation and rezoning. 2 residential, that that could be credited forward to the 3 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Paul? 3 townhome development, but we will definitely work with 4 MR. JAMES: The linear park that goes 4 the park director. 5 around by the townhomes, it is my understanding the 5 MR. JAMES: One of their concerns with the 6 recamiendation from the Park Board is that they did not 6 linear park is the maintenance. 7 want the linear park. They want to keep that as a 7 MR. STICKA: The Park Board would like to 8 landscape buffer still keeping the bike trail going 8 maintain it as private? 9 through there but not being City park around the 9 MR. JAMES: It would be a landscape buffer 10 property that would be part of the landscape buffer. 10 area and would be part of the townhomes and the 11 MR. BAKER: Mark Baker. That is something 11 commmity -- and would be maintained by that community. 12 that we will definitely talk with Laura about. 12 MR. STICKA: Would we still have access for 13 The way we have approached it is 13 the general public? 14 that we would like to keep that linear park flexible 14 MR. JAMES: Yes, through that trail. 15 because of not knowing the actual layout. One thing 15 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Like we have done on 16 that we would be willing to do is commit a set acreage 16 several other developments. 17 like a minimum of three acres. 17 MR. STICKA: I am wondering about schools. 18 We will work something out as to 18 The schools lately have been saying they want land 19 what that linear park would be, but we would like to 19 instead of cash. Is this strictly a cash contribution 20 keep it flexible now so that when a developer came to 20 to the schools? 21 do a layout for the townhome parcel, they can slide it 21 MS. KRAMER: Most likely. 22 north or south based on how their design worked; and we 22 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Have you had any 23 would also like to keep it flexible. 23 discussion yet with the school district? 24 If there is any excess in the land 24 MR. KOLRY: No. DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 16 17 I 1 MAYOR PROCHASKA: You know, that will need 1 MR. BAKER: That is one of the exhibits 2 to be part of the -- before this will come for a vote 2 that we have outlined. Like I said earlier, it is a 3 before the City Council, we will need to have advice as 3 work in progress right now. 4 to the school district as to what they are looking for 4 MR. STICKA: Just a coment about those 5 in that area. 5 narrower lots. I don't think we are comfortable with a 6 MR. GRAFF: I do know that we had some 6 request for smaller setbacks. 7 general discussion with the school district when we 7 MAYOR PROCHASKA: In other words, 8 talked about the Moser project and bringing this 8 maintain -- 9 project in and with the Theidel -- the Hinsdale Nursery 9 MR. STICKA: I am just mentioning that. 10 project that when the school district met with Doc 10 MAYOR PROCHASKA: I think I was thinking 11 Engler in this roan here with Rich Theidel, they were 11 the same thing as I was looking at that. 12 looking at -- since this was more of a residential near 12 MR. STICKA: One of the lots is wide in the 13 the commercial, that locating an elementary school on 13 back and narrower in the front. Some of the lots are 14 the Theidel piece was more favorable. 14 not that way. 15 That is what the superintendent was 15 MR. BAKER: We are not requesting a 16 looking for. We never went any further. He was aware 16 variation in the setbacks. 17 of this project in regards to the whole concept of the 17 MR. STICKA: I don't think setback 18 area, and we were looking for direction from the school 18 reduction is -- well, the other question I had was 19 superintendent. 19 about that detention depth. I kind of forget what 20 MAYOR PROCHASKA: As is normally the case, 20 happened there. 21 the school district will be asked to supply a letter to 21 Did we approve a deeper pond? 22 us letting us know that that is their feelings. I 22 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Well, I think the other 23 would suggest you sit down and talk to them and make 23 one was based on being a commercial area. Now, you 24 sure. 24 are -- DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 18 19 1 MR. JAMES: So the requirements for 1 it, that you want to make sure that there is some kind 2 commercial are a little different. 2 of a safety slope. 3 MAYOR PROCHASKA: I think -- well, the 3 MR. STICKA: Safety slope, step down. 4 engineer does have some discretion on when these things 4 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Right because it would be 5 are laid out; and, again, when they are in the 5 right adjacent to the townhomes. If that was the case, 6 commercial area as opposed to residential, they may 6 you would be right against residential. That would be 7 have children there or something. I know that will be 7 something I'd like to look at. 8 looked at as a whole and other things in the past, too, 8 MR. GRAFF: This was looked at in the 9 when we start looking around as far as variances. 9 commercial site. They have done some re- engineering 10 Now, we are marrying a commercial 10 from the initial site plan working with CDF, our r 11 area with a residential area, and I think that is where 11 environmental engineers, to have -- since it is a 12 the -- 12 granular area -- to have it recharged to ground water 13 MR. STICKA: So your goal would be to try 13 so we are not releasing water into the Blackberry Creek 14 to -- obviously it has to be six -foot deep where it 14 at a higher rate. 15 meets the existing ponds. There is no choice in the 15 I know our city engineer as well as 16 matter, but they would gradually reduce that depth. 16 our conservation design form come up with -- and Mike 17 MR. BISCAN: We would like to keep the 17 Schoppe -- to come up with prairie grass type method 18 basic design and expand on that. 18 along with the wet bottom that will sustain those types 19 MR. STIC'KA: The whole thing? 19 of plant materials and also help filter the water. 20 MR. BISCAN: Yes, where the storage is. 20 MR. BISCAN: The storm water management 21 MAYOR PROCHASKA: I'd like to get some 21 won't be a wet bottom per se as a deep 10 -foot pond, 22 input on our engineering on that. I would be concerned 22 but it will have a tendency to have a high moisture 23 that at least as it backs up along -- especially if you 23 content in the bottom for the wetlands and prairie 24 are looking at a linear park and a trail very close to 24 grasses. DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 l 20 21 1 MR. STICKA: I support that idea as far as 1 cross - section pavement. 2 the landscape buffer is concerned. I don't remember if 2 Mike Schoppe has to look at this. 3 our landscape ordinance addresses like the buffer along 3 What sounds like -- with the realignment for the 4 Kennedy Road or not. 4 recommendation for traffic issues of Kennedy Road, it 5 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Again, I believe it does, 5 sounds like now we are going to be a 40 -foot buffer 6 along arterial streets, yes. 6 minimum along Kennedy Road. 7 MR. STICKA: So long as you are doing at 7 MR. STICKN: In conformance with the 8 least what our ordinance calls for, I am fine with 8 ordinance when Kennedy Road is widened, the land comes 9 that. 9 from the developer's property and not from the other 10 MS. KRAMER: The way the PUD is they have 10 side of the street; is that correct? 11 to do what is required to the landscape ordinance, and 11 MR. GRAFF: Correct. We are mainly doing 12 I think actually the preliminary plans they showed us 12 the engineering for helping soften the curve to slow 13 go beyond that. 13 the traffic down to 35 miles an hour speed limit there, 14 MR. STIC'KA: Yes. That is what I thought, 14 and we are requiring a barrier curb because that would 15 too. 15 also be a safety issue that was recommended by our 16 MS. KRAMER: That is one of those things 16 safety transportation engineers. 17 that will get ironed out completely when they came in 17 MS. OHARE: I have a question. Because 18 with their preliminary plat. 18 your development property won't start I am assuming 19 MAYOR PROCHASKA: The only question I had 19 until the construction is done on Kennedy, will there 20 was it 25 or does the ordinance say 30? 20 be like turn lanes there? Will there be a stop light 21 MR. GRAFF: I believe it is 25 on the 21 there? 22 collector roads, but we will have to get this verified 22 I know eventually you said Kennedy 23 in regards to Kennedy Road how we are going to be 23 is going to be widened to four lanes; is that right? 24 looking at this when it is going through a three -lane 24 MR. BISCAN: Kennedy will be widened to I DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 i 22 23 1 three lanes. 1 of the development agreement is that they would be 2 MS. OHARE: With a turn lane? 2 allowed to have private streets in there which means 3 MR. BISCAN: It will have three lanes and 3 the City would not maintain them. It would be the 4 basically the center lane will be a striped median 4 homeowner's association or whatever, and I am sorry. I 5 except for the left -turn lanes to go into the side 5 know you said the 48 -foot right of way. How wide is 6 streets. Otherwise, that center lane will not be used. 6 the back to back? 7 I believe there is already a traffic signal going in at 7 MS. BISCAN: 26 feet back to back. 8 Kennedy Road and Route 47. That is currently part of 8 MAYOR PROCHASKA: 26 feet back to back. 9 the plat I believe. 9 Now, current City standard is 31 foot? 10 MAYOR PROCHASKA: It is already there. We 10 MR. GRAFF: 30 foot back. 11 are waiting for it to get connected. 11 MAYOR PROCHASKA: 30 foot back to back with 12 MR. GRAFF: We are waiting for ComEd 12 a 66 -foot right of way. So they are asking for a 13 connection. 13 little bit narrower than what we allow. They want 14 MS. OHARE: My second question is -- you 14 private streets. 15 and the council may already know this, but that area 15 That would be something we would 16 where the townhones are, when that starts to be -- you 16 also have to take into account when we look at parking 17 find an actual developer for it, will we have control 17 and what is being allowed when they go to plat. That 18 over the size of that area and the streets? 18 would all have to be -- 19 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Well, that is exactly 19 MS. OHARE: That would be my concern. 20 what they are saying. They would have to come back to 20 With single -car garages there 21 us with a plat. 21 assuming people park in the streets, you can't get 22 MS. OHARE: The developer. 22 around it. 23 MAYOR PROCHASKA: When the developer 23 MR. GRAFF: Our townhome requirement, you 24 starts. However, what they are asking is for as part 24 have to have two car garages and you have to have DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 i 24 25 1 stacking in the driveway so you fit four cars in the 1 I probably will have that answer for 2 driveways. The driveways would have to be long enough 2 you though by the time we come back to you for 3 to have cars park on them. 3 preliminary plat approval. 4 MS. OHARE: I have recently driven through 4 MR. STICKA: You will have some fancy -- I 5 the area of Fox Hill, and it is like a raceway trying 5 am saying some fancy, romantic name? 6 to get through there. 6 MR. KOLBY: It will be attractive. 7 MR. STICKA: I was wondering about the 7 MR. STICKA: Okay. I was just wondering. 8 signage. I am assuming it will conform to the 8 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Just a point of issue 9 ordinance requirements. I don't know. 9 here, as I was reading on Page 10 as you are looking in 10 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Actually 124 feet is a 10 there about the sewer lines, it states that the 11 little larger -- 11 Sanitary District with any lines 18 inches or larger 12 MR. STIC'KA: So is this actually a variance 12 would be conveyed to the Sanitary District; and as you 13 request? 13 read down a little bit further it says it is 14 Also, is it going to be known as 14 responsible for ongoing care, maintenance, replacement, 15 Menards Residential? Is that the sign? When people 15 renewal of said large lines and sanitary lines which 16 enter the subdivision, they are living in Menards 16 are 18 inches in diameter, shall be conveyed to the 17 Residential? 17 City. 18 MR. KOLBY: No. Hopefully not. We will be 18 I think you want to say which are 19 a little more creative than that. 19 less than 18 inches because we don't want to have that 20 We have thrown a bunch of names at 20 issue where that 18 inches does go to the City -- so 18 21 this point but haven't specifically narrowed down one 21 and larger goes to the sanitary. Anything less than 22 because we are still negotiating with a specific home 22 that goes to the City. 23 builder to get started there. I don't have that 23 Point of note, but it is a point 24 specific answer. 24 that can become an issue some day. DepoOourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 26 27 1 Anything else? 1 hearing is now closed. 2 (No response.) 2 (Whereupon proceedings were 3 MAYOR PROCHASKA: At this time, I would 3 then had which are not 4 entertain a motion to close the public hearing on 4 herein transcribed.) 5 PC2002 -16, Mekm Residential. 5 6 MR. STICKA: So moved. 6 7 MS. SPEARS: Second. 7 8 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Moved and second. 8 9 Would you do roll call, please. 9 10 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Burd? 10 11 MS. BURR: Aye. 11 12 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: James? 12 13 MR. JAMES: Aye. 13 14 MS. MIISCHEWSKI: Kot? 14 15 MR. KOT: Aye. 15 16 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Munns? 16 17 MR. MUNNS: Aye. 17 18 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Spears? 18 19 MS. SPEARS: Aye. 19 20 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Sticka? 20 21 MR. STICKA: Aye. 21 22 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Ohare? 22 23 MS. OHARE: Aye. 23 24 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Motion carried. Public 24 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 28 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS. 2 COUNTY OF KENDAL L ) 3 I, Nicola Gengler, C.S.R., No. 84 -3780, do 4 hereby certify that the proceedings had in the 5 above- entitled cause were recorded stenographically by 6 we and reduced to typewriting via conputer -aided 7 transcription under my personal direction; and that the 8 foregoing is a true and correct transcript of the 9 proceedings had at the time and place previously 10 specified. 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my 12 hand this 4th day of June, 2003. 13 � 14 kola lengler, C.S.R. 4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 YORX527.TXT Page 1 -------------------- - - - - -- above- entitled 1:12; 28:5 background 4:17 closer 6:2 access 5:13,14,15,16; 7:8; backs 18:23 closing 11:20 -------------------- - - - - -- 9:10,22; 15:12 BARER 3:22; 4:2,9; 8:11; code 7:6,15 1 02 4:19 account 23:16 13:4,22; 14:11; 17:1,15 cohesively 12:13 -------------------- - - - - -- acre 5:13 barrier 21 :14 collector 20:22 * acreage 11:5; 14:16 based 4:21; 10:3; 14:22; column 9:5,8 -------------------- - - - - -- acres 6:11,12; 14:17 17:23 come 4:7; 13:14; 16:2; * 27:5 1 act 5:6 J basic 18:18 19:16,17; 20:17; 22:20; -------------------- - - - - -- actual 7:1; 14:15; 22:17 basically 3:5; 5:8; 22:4 25:2 - actually 5:3; 13:17; basin 8:3,5 ComBd 22:12 -------------------- - - - - -- 20:12; 24:10,12 become 25:24 comes 21:8 - 2:18 add 10:6; 12:1 behalf 2:16 comfortable 5:19; 17:5 -------------------- - - - - -- added 5:13,14 behind 4:14; 5:6 comment 17:4 1 additional 5:13; 10:6,11 believe 20:5,21; 22:7,9 comments 3:9,15; 4:22; -------------------- - - - - -- address 3:15 berm 9:23; 10:9,18 5:20,21; 12:17,20 10 25:9 addressed 5:20 berms 9:23 commercial 16:13; 17:23; 10 -foot 19:21 addresses 20:3 beyond 20:13 I 18:2,6,10; 19:9 1107A 2:14.5 adjacent 7:9; 8:3; 9:20; bike 14:8 commissions 4:21 12,000 7:2 19:5 billboard 8:21 commit 14:16 124 24:10 Administrator 2:4 Biscan 4:4,11; 7:22; common 10:21,23 14,000 7:4 admit 4:23; 6:4,13; 7:13; 18:17,20; 19:20; 21:24; community 9:3; 12:4,7,13; 143 6:23 8:14; 9:16; 10:20 22:3; 23:7 15:11 144 6:23 advice 16:3 bit 7:16; 23:13; 25:13 completely 20:17 18 25:11,16,19,20 agreement 3:6; 23:1 Blackberry 19:13 comprehensive 9:11 -------------------- - - - - -- Alderman 2:7,8,9,11 blue 6:8,10 computer -aided 28:6 2 Alderwoman 2:6,10,12 Board 5:20,21; 14:6; 15:7 concept 4:20,21,24; 5:2; -------------------- - - - - -- allow 7:8; 9:23; 10:8; boards 4:20 6:15; 13:5; 16:17 20 10:6 23:13 bottom 19:18,21,23 concern 23:19 2003 1:14; 28:12 allowed 6:21; 7:12; 23:2, Bridge 2:14.5 concerned 18:22; 20:2 25 20:20,21 17 briefly 3:13; 5:1; 8:12 concerns 15:5 25 -foot 9:20; 10:2 allows 8:6 bring 12:14; 13:20 conform 24:8 26 23:7,8 alone 13:13 bringing 16:8 conformance 21:7 26 -foot 7:7 already 12:6; 13:24; 22:7, buffer 5:7; 9:20; 10:2,6, conjunction 6:15; 10:18 27 1:14 10,15 18; 14:8,10; 15:9; 20:2, connected 22:11 -------------------- - - - - -- amenities 8:14 3; 21:5 connection 22:13 3 amount 11:6 buffers 9:18; 10:15; 11:2 conservation 19:16 -------------------- - - - - -- analyze 9:15 build 12:9 considering 11:10 30 20:20; 23:10,11 analyzed 10:4 builder 24:23 consistent 7:18 31 23:9 annexation 3:6; 14:2 building 11:13 consolidate 5:24 35 21:13 annexed 6:9,11; 13:24 bunch 24:20 construction 11:11; 21:19 -------------------- - - - - -- another 7:5; 11:2,3 BURD 2:6; 26:10,11 Consultants 4:3,10 4 answer 24:24; 25:1 -------------------- - - - - -- I content 19:23 -------------------- - - - - -- answering 11:22 C continuing 12:8 4.25 5:13 ANTON 2:4 -------------------- - - - - -- ( contribution 15:19 40 10:8 anybody 3:7,14; 13:10 C -1 9:16 control 8:6; 22:17 40 -foot 21:5 appeared 2:16 C -2 10:12 conveyed 25:12,16 400 -foot 10:13 approached 14:13 C.S.R 28:14.5 correct 21:10,11; 28:8 47 4:15; 22:8 approval 25:3 C.S.R. 1:13; 28:3 corridor 9:24 48 -foot 7:8; 23:5 approve 17:21 calculated 11:5,6 council 1:6; 3:20; 12:21; 4th 28:12 approved 13:15 call 6:19; 26:9 16:3; 22:15 -------------------------- approximately 6:10,12 called 6:22; 8:15 COUNTY 1:3.5; 28:2 5 area 6:7,8,10,11; 7:7; calling 8:20; 9:5 couple 7:21 -------------------- - - - - -- 8:3,8; 13:23; 15:10; calla 20:8 creative 24:19 50 -foot 10:8 16:5,18; 17:23; 18:6,11; came 14:20 credit 11:11 -------------------- - - - - -- 19:12; 22:15,18; 24:5 car 23:24 credited 15:2 6 areas 8:16; 9:15; 10:23; care 25:14 Creek 19:13 -------------------- - - - - -- 11:4,8 carried 26:24 I cross- section 21:1 60560 2:15 around 4:19; 12:6; 14:5,9; cars 24:1,3 curb 21:14 66 -foot 23:12 18:9; 23:22 case 16:20; 19:5 current 5:9; 7:6,14; 8:5; 68.5 6:12 Art 3:8 cash 5:5; 11:7; 15:1,19 23:9 -------------------- - - - - -- arterial 20:6 category 5:9; 6:21 currently 7:19; 10:1; 7 ARTHUR 2:2 cause 28:5 11:5; 13:4,11; 22:8 -------------------- - - - - -- association 23:4 CDF 19:10 curve 21:12 70 7:1 assuming 21:18; 23:21; center 5:6; 22:4,6 -------------------------- 73.7 6:11 24:8 centrally 5:22 D 74 7:1 attract 8:21 certify 28:4 -------------------------- 77 6:23 attractive 25:6 changed 5:11 D- 653003 1:18 78 6:23 audience 12:18 changes 5:1,10,21 DANIEL 2:14 7 :00 1:14 average 7:3 children 18:7 day 25:24; 28:12 -------------------- - - - - -- aware 8:22; 12:5; 16:16 choice 18:15 dealing 13:3 8 Aye 26:11,13,15,17,19,21, circle 6:22 dedicated 11:1,12 -------------------- - - - - -- 23 city 1:6; 2:3,4,5,16; 6:6; deep 18:14; 19:21 800 1:14 -------------------- - - - - -- 11:13; 14:9; 16:3; 19:15; deeper 17:21 84 -3780 1:13; 28:3 B 23:3,9; 25:17,20,22 definitely 14:12; 15:3 -------------------------- ------------------ ---- ---- City's 5:9 density 5:12; 13:18 A back 9:12; 12:14; 13:14; Clerk 2:5 depth 7:16,17; 8:5,6; -------------------- - - - - -- 17:13; 22:20; 23:6,7,8, close 18:24; 26:4 17:19; 18:16 able 8:7 10,11; 25:2 closed 27:1 describe 6:5 YORK527.TXT Page 2 design 9:13; 14:22; 18:18; -------------------- - - - - -- higher 6:3; 19:14 lane 22:2,4,6 19:16 F Hill 24:5 lanes 21:20,23; 22:1,3,5 detached 5:7 -------------------- - - - - -- Hinsdale 16:9 language 11:16 detailed 5:2 facilities 10:21; 11:11,13 home 24:22 large 10:16; 25:15 detention 7:16,17,18; facility 8:1 homeowner's 23:4 larger 6:1; 24:11; 25:11, 11:4,17; 17:19 fact 5:19 Hopefully 24:18 21 developed 13:14 fairly 5:2 hour 1:14; 21:13 LARRY 2:8; 12:22 developer 13:8; 14:20; family 13:1,21; 14:2 houses 12:9 lately 15:18 22:17,22,23 fancy 25:4,5 However 22:24 Laura 14:12 developer's 21:9 far 18:9; 20:1 -------------------- - - - - -- LAW 2:14 development 7:3; 8:2,17; Farm 1:15 I layout 13:6; 14:15,21 9:15,19; 10:24; 12:6,18; favorable 16:14 -------------------- - - - - -- least 8:8; 18:23; 20:8 15:3; 21:18; 23:1 feel 3:16; 5:18 idea 13:3; 20:1 left -turn 22:5 developments 15:16 feelings 16:22 identification 8:17; 9:2 less 25:19,21 diameter 25:16 feet 7:1,2; 8:5,6,8; 10:6; identified 6:18; 9:17 letter 16:21 different 18:2 23:7,8; 24:10 identifies 8:16; 11:1,2,4 letting 16:22 direction 16:18; 28:7 filter 19:19 identify 3:8 light 21:20 directly 5:6 final 10:20 ILLINOIS 1:2.5,15; 2:15; likely 15:21 director 11:9; 15:4 find 22:17 28:1 limit 21:13 discretion 18:4 fine 20:8 illustrate 8:12; 10:22 line 6:17 discussion 15:23; 16:7 first 3:12; 4:16; 8:19 illustrates 10:13 linear 14:4,7,14,19; 15:6; dispersed 5:22 fit 5:8; 24:1 inches 25:11,16,19,20 18:24 district 13:24; 15:23; five 5:12; 10:9 include 6:20; 9:20 lines 25:10,11,15 16:4,7,10,21; 25:11,12 flexibility 7:10 initial 19:10 list 10:15 Doc 16:10 flexible 14:14,20,23 initially 5:12,22 listing 6:3 document 4:13; 6:6 floor 12:17 input 12:12; 18:22 little 4:17; 7:16; 18:2; doing 6:18; 20:7; 21:11 focusing 13:20 inset 9:9 23:13; 24:11,19; 25:13 done 6:1; 15:15; 19:9; foot 7:4; 23:9,10,11 instead 15:19 living 24:16 21:19 footage 7:1 intent 7:23; 8:13 locate 8:16 down 9:4; 16:23; 19:3; foregoing 28:8 intermixed 10:17 located 4:14; 8:24 21:13; 24:21; 25:13 forget 17:19 ironed 20:17 locating 16:13 draft 4:12 form 19:16 issue 21:15; 25:8,20,24 location 8:15,19 drafted 13:12 forward 11:22; 12:8,12; issues 21:4 logo 9:9 drawings 10:3 15:2 -------------------- - - - - -- long 20:7; 24:2 driven 24:4 four 6:20; 8:6; 21:23; J look 9:12; 11:22; 12:24; driveway 24:1 24:1 -------------------- - - - - -- 19:7; 21:2; 23:16 driveways 24:2 four -foot 9:23 JACKIB 2:5 looked 18:8; 19:8 -------------------- - - - - -- Fox 24:5 JAMBS 2:7; 14:4; 15:5,9, looking 12:8,11; 13:19; B frankly 13:16 14; 18:1; 26:12,13 16:4,12,16,18; 17:11; -------------------- - - - - -- free 3:16 January 4:19 18:9,24; 20:24; 25:9 each 11:5 front 17:13 job 12:2 looks 10:5 earlier 17:2 further 16:16; 25:13 June 28:12 lot 6:24; 7:4 easement 7:8; 9:22; 11:17 future 11:23 -------------------- - - - - -- lots 6:20,22,23; 7:2; east 5:15 -------------------- - - - - -- K 9:21,22; 17:5,12,13 elementary 16:13 G ---- ----------- --- -------- -------------------------- end 3:21 -------------------- - - - - -- keep 14:7,14,20,23; 18:17 M engineer 18:4; 19:15 Game 1:14 keeping 14:8 -------------------------- engineering 4:4,11; 7:23; garages 23:20,24 KELLY 2:15.5 made 5:1,11,21 18:22; 21:12 Gary 4:4,11; 11:20,24 KBNDALL 1:3.5; 28:2 main 9:8 engineers 19:11; 21:16 general 15:13; 16:7 Kennedy 4:14; 5:16; 8:1, mainly 21:11 Engler 16:11 Gengler 1:13; 28:3,14.5 24; 10:2,5,13; 11:3; maintain 15:8; 17:8; 23:3 enough 24:2 glad 12:3 20:4,23; 21:4,6,8,19,22, maintained 15:11 enter 24:16 goal 18:13 24; 22:8 maintenance 11:16; 15:6; entertain 26:4 gradually 18:16 Kevin 4:3,11; 7:15,20,22 25:14 entitled 13:13 GRAFF 2:4; 16:6; 19:8; kind 3:17; 12:23; 17:19; management 8:1; 19:20 entry 8:24; 9:5,6 20:21; 21:11; 22:12; 19:1 map 8:15,19 environmental 19:11 23:10,23 knowing 14:15 Mark 4:2,9; 12:1; 13:4; especially 18:23 granular 19:12 known 24:14 14:11 Even 13:19 grass 19:17 Kolby 4:4,11; 11:20,24; marketing 8:20,21 evening 11:21,24 grasses 19:24 15:24; 24:18; 25:6 marrying 18:10 eventually 21:22 green 10:24; 11:1,2,3 ROT 2:8; 12:23; 13:19; MARTY 2:9 evergreen 10:16 ground 19:12 26:14,15 match 8:7 evidence 4:23 -------------------- - - - - -- KRAMBR 2:14,15.5; 3:7,12; materials 11:12; 19:19 exactly 22:19 H 13:23; 15:21; 20:10,16 matter 1:12; 18:16 excellent 12:2 -------------------- - - - - -- -------------------- - - - - -- MAYOR 2:2; 3:3,11,19,24; except 22:5 Hamman 5:15 L 4:6; 12:14,20; 14:3; excess 7:2; 14:24 hand 28:12 -------------------- - - - - -- 15:15,22; 16:1,20; 17:7, exhibit 4:24; 6:4,13,14, happened 17:20 labeled 4:24; 6:13; 9:16; 10,22; 18:3,21; 19:4; 22; 7:13; 8:15; 9:14,16; hear 3:10 10:12,21 20:5,19; 22:10,19,23; 10:2,11,12,20,21,22 hearing 1:7,12; 3:4,5; laid 13:2; 18:5 23:8,11; 24:10; 25:8; exhibits 8:12; 17:1 26:4; 27:1 Lake 5:15 26:3,8,24 existing 7:24; 8:3,4; help 19:19 land 5:22,24; 11:1,6,7,14, McHugh 5:14; 8:24; 9:20; 18:15 helping 21:12 17; 14:24; 15:18; 21:8 10:7; 11:3 expand 7:24; 18:18 hereby 28:4 landscape 8:13; 9:9,15,17, means 23:2 expansion 10:5 herein 3:2; 27:4 18,20; 10:2,9,12,14; median 22:4 explain 3:13; 7:16 hereunto 28:11 11:2; 14 :8,10; 15:9; meeting 8:9 hierarchy 8:18 20:2,3,11 meets 18:15 high 19:22 landscaping 9:2,24; 10:14 Menards 1:8; 4:5,12,13,14; YORR527.TXT Page 3 7:19,23; 12:1; 24:15,16; outlined 17:2 16:8,9,10,17 Road 1:15; 4:14; 5:14,17; 26:5 outlines 7:14 property 6:6; 9:7; 13:18; 8:1,24; 9:21; 10:2,5,7, mentioning 17:9 over 3:23; 4:7,24; 5:1,11; 14:10; 21:9,18 13; 11:3; 20:4,23; 21:4, met 4:20; 5:19; 16:10 7:3; 8:12; 9:22; 11:18; proposing 9:19 6,8; 22:8 method 19:17 22:18 provide 8:1 roads 7:9; 20:22 mic 4:7 overall 7:3 provided 11:12 ( roadways 10:19 might 11:22 -------------------- - - - - -- proximity 6:2 roll 26:9 Mike 19:16; 21:2 P public 1:7; 3:3,5,14,16, romantic 25:5 miles 21:13 -------------------- - - - - -- 17; 15:13; 26:4,24 room 16:11 MILSCHEWSRI 2:5; 26:10,12, p.m. 1:14 PUD 3:6; 4:13; 6:5,10,16, ROSE 2:12 14,16,18,20,22 Page 25:9 19; 11:16; 13:12; 20:10 Route 4:15; 22:8 minimum 14:17; 21:6 parcel 13:12; 14:21 put 10:9 mislead 13:10 park 5:20,21,22,24; 6:1,2; -------------------- - - - - -- I S modified 5:16 11:1,6,8,13,14,17; 14:4, Q I -------------------------- moisture 19:22 6,7,9,14,19; 15:1,4,6,7; -------------------- - - - - -- safety 19:2,3; 21:15,16 monument 9:1,8 18:24; 23:21; 24:3 question 17:18; 20:19; same 9:12; 17:11 Moser 16:8 parking 23:16 21:17; 22:14 sanitary 25:11,12,15,21 Most 15:21 part 6:6,7,9; 12:3,4; questions 3:17,18,20; saying 15:18; 22:20; 25:5 motion 26:4,24 14:10; 15:10; 16:2; 22:8, 11:22; 12:18,21 says 25:13 move 4:7; 12:12 24 quite 13:16 scale 9:8 moved 26:6,8 pass 7:15; 11:19 -------------------- - - - - -- scale -down 9:6 MS. 2:5,6,10,12,15.5; 3:7, past 4:18; 5:2,11; 18:8 R school 15:23; 16:4,7,10, 12; 13:23; 15:21; 20:10, PAUL 2:7; 14:3 -------------------- - - - - -- 13,18,21 16; 21:17; 22:2,14,22; pavement 7:8; 21:1 R -2 5:9; 6:21 schools 15:17,18,20 23:7,19; 24:4; 26:7,10, PC2002 -16 1:8; 26:5 R -3 13:24 Schoppe 19:17; 21:2 11,12,14,16,18,19,20,22, people 23:21; 24:15 raceway 24:5 se 19:21 23 per 7:4; 11:6; 19:21 range 10:8 SEC 4:3,10 MUNNS 2:9; 26:16,17 personal 28:7 ( rate 19:14 second 22:14; 26:7,8 -------------------- - - - - -- petitioner 3:13,15,18 re- engineering 19:9 secondary 9:6 N piece 13:20; 16:14 read 25:13 section 10:14 -------------------- - - - - -- place 28:9 reading 25:9 seeking 14:1 name 3:24; 4:2,9; 25:5 plan 4:20,21,24; 5:2; realignment 21:3 series 8:11 names 24:20 6:14,15; 9:17,18; 10:12, reality 13:7 serve 9:22 narrow 7:11 24; 12:23; 13:6,9,11,15; receive 11:10 set 13:9,11; 14:16; 28:11 narrowed 24:21 19:10 received 4:22 setback 17:17 narrower 17:5,13; 23:13 Planning 4:3,10 recently 24:4 setbacks 17:6,16 near 16:12 plans 13:5; 20:12 recharged 19:12 seven -acre 6:2; 15:1 need 4:7; 16:1,3 plant 10:15; 19:19 recommendation 14:6; 21:4 several 15:16 negotiating 11:8; 24:22 plantings 10:10 recommended 21:15 sewer 25:10 neighborhood 5:4,23; 9:5, plants 10:16 record 4:8 shade 10:16 6,11 plat 6:17; 10:3; 20:18; recorded 28:5 shades 10:24 never 16:16 22:9,21; 23:17; 25:3 reduce 18:16 shall 25:16 new 8:17,22 please 3:20; 4:1; 7:20; reduced 28:6 show 6:1; 10:1; 13:5 next 8:23 26:9 reduction 17 :18 showed 20:12 Nicola 1:13; 28:3,14.5 plotting 5:3 refine 11:15 showing 5:5 No. 1:13; 28:3 point 5:16; 12:11; 24:21; refining 6:15 ( shown 6:8,9 normally 3:21; 16:20 25:8,23 reflection 9:7 side 21:10; 22:5 north 14:22 points 5:14; 9:10 regards 16:17; 20:23 sign 8:21,23; 24:15 note 25:23 pond 17:21; 19:21 relationship 12:8 signage 8:14,15,17,18,20; notice 13:1 ponds 7:18; 18:15 releasing 19:13 9:1; 24:8 number 10:15; 13:13 POWELL 2:3 remarks 11:20 signal 22:7 Nursery 16:9 prairie 19:17,23 remember 20:2 since 16:12; 19:11 -------------------- - - - - -- preliminary 6:14,16; 9:17, renderings 13:2 single 13:1,21; 14:2 0 18; 10:3,12; 13:5; 20:12, renewal 25:15 single -car 23:20 -------------------- - - - - -- 18; 25:3 replacement 25:14 single- family 5:8 obviously 18:14 prepared 9:14; 10:22 REPORT 1:11 sit 16:23 OFFICES 2:14 preparing 6:16; 10:4 request 17:6; 24:13 site 7:19; 13:6,9,15; OHARE 2:10; 21:17; 22:2, present 2:1; 4:12 requested 7:14 19:9,10 14,22; 23:19; 24:4; pretty 5:18; 13:2 requesting 6:5,7; 7:7; situation 13:7 26:22,23 previously 28:9 17:15 six 8:5,8 okay 3:12,22; 4:9; 25:7 primary 8:23; 9:1,2 requests 5:24 six -foot 10:9; 18:14 one 5:20,23; 10:14; 11:1, private 7:6,10; 15:8; required 11:6; 20:11 size 6:24; 22:18 7,9; 14:15; 15:5; 17:1, 23:2,14 requirement 23:23 slide 14:21 12,23; 20:16; 24:21 probably 4:6; 25:1 requirements 18:1; 24:9 slope 19:2,3 ongoing 25:14 proceedings 1:11; 3:1; requiring 21:14 slow 21:12 only 8:6; 20:19 27:2; 28:4,9 residential 1:8; 4:13; smaller 6:20; 9:8; 10:17; open 10:23; 11:4; 12:7,16 process 6:14,17; 10:4 5:23; 7:23; 8:2; 9:21; 17:6 opposed 18:6 PROC74ASKA 2:2; 3:3,11,19, 13:24; 15:2; 16:12; 18:6, Smith 4:4,11; 7:22 order 8:4,7 24; 4:6; 12:14,20; 14:3; 11; 19:6; 24:15,17; 26:5 soften 21:12 ordinance 8:6; 11:7; 15:1; 15:15,22; 16:1,20; 17:7, response 12:19; 26:2 something 14:11,18; 18:7; 20:3,8,11,20; 21:8; 24:9 10,22; 18:3,21; 19:4; responsible 25:14 19:7; 23:15 ornamental 10:17 20:5,19; 22:10,19,23; retail 5:6; 7:19 sorry 23:4 other 5:21; 8:11; 9:10; 23:8,11; 24:10; 25:8; reviewed 13:15 sounds 21:3,5 15:16; 17:7,18,22; 18:8; 26:3,8,24 revised 4:21 south 2:14.5; 5:15; 14:22 21:9 product 5:5,8; 6:3; 13:8, rezoned 6:8,9,10,11 space 10:23; 11:4 Otherwise 22:6 17 rezoning 14:1,2 speaking 3:7 out 6:19,22; 8:20; 11:10; progress 17:3 Rich 16:11 SPEARS 2:12; 26:7,18,19 13:2; 14:18; 18:5; 20:17 project 3:13; 4:18; 12:10; RICHARD 2:11 specific 11:7; 24:22,24 YORF527.TXT Page 4 specifically 24:21 I transcribed 3:2; 27:4 I 24:8,18; 25:1,4,6 I I specified 28:10 I transcript 28:8 I WILLIAM 2:3 I I specifies 10:15 I transcription 28:7 I willing 14:16 I I speed 21:13 I transitional 5:7 I within 5:8; 6:6; 7:7,10; square 7:1,2,4 I transitioned 11:18 I 8:19; 9:15; 12:7 SS 1:3; 28:1.5 I transportation 21:16 I WITNESS 28:11 stacking 24:1 I Treasurer 2:3 I wondering 15:17; 24:7; I I stage 4:20 I trees 10:16,17 I 25:7 I I stand 3:23 I true 28:8 I words 7:21; 17:7 I I standard 23:9 I try 18:13 I work 11:10; 14:18; 15:3; standpoint 7:3 I trying 24:5 I 17:3 stands 13:13 I turn 21:20; 22:2 I worked 14:22 start 4:16; 18:9; 21:18 I two 8:9; 23:24 I working 4:18; 11:15,23; I I started 4:18; 24:23 I type 19:17 I 19:10 I I starts 22:16,24 I types 19:18 I -------------- ------ - - - - -- I I STATE 1:2.5; 3:24; 28:1 I typewriting 28:6 I Y states 25:10 I typical 6:20; 7:12; 10:13, I -------------------------- stay 7:18 I 15; 13:6 I year 4:18; :18; 5:2,11 I I stenographically 28:5 I--- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- l y e I I step 9:4; 19:3 I U I YORKVILLE 1:6,15; 2:15, STICFA 2:11; 15:7,12,17; I -------------------- - - - - -- I 16.5; 12:3; 14:1 17:4,9,12,17; 18:13,19; I ultimate 13:17 I -------------------- - - - - -- I I 19:3; 20:1,7,14; 21:7; I ultimately 10:7 I Z I I 24:7,12; 25:4,7; 26:6,20, I under 28:7 I -------------------------- 21 I understanding 14:5 I zoning 4:13; 5:9; 6:21; still 11:8; 14:8; 15:12; I uniform 9:11 I 7:6,12,15 I I 24:22 I uniformed 6:1 I ----- ------ -- --- -------- -- I I stop 21:20 I United 2:16 storage 8:2; 18:20 I units 5:12; 13:13 I -------------------------- store 4:14; 12:7 I until 3:20; 21:19 I - storm 7:24; 8:2; 19:20 I up 4:7; 12:15,16; 13:12; I 28:14 straight 6:21 I 18:23; 19:16,17 I I I street 2:14.5; 7:10; 21:10 I utilities 7:9 I I I streets 7:6 20:6 22:6, I --- ---------- ----- -- - - - - -- I I I 18; 23:2,14,21 I V I I I strictly 15:19 I -------------------------- striped 22:4 I VALERIE 2:6 I I I Stub 5:14,15 I variance 24:12 I I I subdivision 5:3; 6:17; I variances 6:18,19; 18:9 I I I 7:24; 8:5,22; 24:16 I variation 7:5,17; 8:10; suggest 16:23 I 17:16 I I I superintendent 16:15,19 I variations 7:14 I I I supply 16:21 I variety 10:22 I I I support 12:12; 20:1 I various 4:20 sustain 19:18 I vary 6:24 I I I swear 3:11 I verified 20:22 I I I swearing 3:9 I via 28:6 I I I --------------- ----- - ----- I visitors 8:22 T I vote 16:2 I--------------------- --- -- I ---- ------------ --- ---- --- I I I talked 16:8 I W temporary 8:21 I -------------------------- tendency 19:22 I wait 3:20 terms 8:13; 11:16 I waiting 22:11,12 testimony 1:11 I WANDA 2:10 Theidel 16:9,11,14 I water 7:24; 8:2; 19:12,13, I I I themselves 3:8 I 19,20 I I I thing 14:15; 17:11; 18:19 I way 11:10; 13:11,12; things 11:9; 18:4,8; 20:16 I 14:13; 17:14; 20:10; thinking 8:13; 17:10 I 23:5,12 I I I though 13:19; 25:2 I ways 7:11 three 9:23; 10:24; 14:17; I wet 19:18,21 I I I 22:1,3 I wetlands 19:23 I I I three -foot 9:23 I whatever 23:4 I I I three -lane 20:24 I whereas 14:1 throughout 9:10,19; 10:23 I WHEREOF 28:11 thrown 24:20 I Whereupon 27:2 I I I tie 9:12 I whole 13:20; 16:17; 18:8, I I I together 9:12 I 19 I I I tonight 3:8; 4:3,10 I wide 17:12; 23:5 I I I townhome 5:5; 7:7; 13:6; I widened 21:8,23,24 I I I 14:21; 15:3; 23:23 I width 6:21,24; 10:8 townhomes 5:12; 7:11; I widths 7:8 I I I 12:24; 14:5; 15:10; 19:5; I will 3:8,9,10,12,16,22; I I I 22:16 I 8:24; 10:17; 14:12,18; I I I traffic 21:4,13; 22:7 I 15:3; 16:1,2,3,21; 18:7; I I I trail 14:8; 15:14; 18:24 I 19:18,22; 20:17,22; I I I trails 11:13 I 21:19,20,24; 22:3,4,6,17; I I I ' ICI III CONCEPTUAL DETENTION, EXPANSION FOR RESIDENTIAL /� 60' FROM CENTER LINE TO REAR LOT LINE FOR -{ I APPROX. 10 -11 ACRES / EXPANSION OF KENNEDY ROAD tJt`11T1t® CITY OFYORKVILLE �\ /� / LANDSCAPE EASEMENT PROVIDES BUFFER / BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND CITY COUNCIL — \ v ° SECOND ACCESS TO MCHUGH i - KENNEDY ROAD PUBLIC ' INO ` ADDED PER REQUEST _ \ \ Oaten a -�.p 3 BY PLANNING COMMISSION \ PC # �LOa l to / - _ \ PARCEL 2 m i 12,000 S.F. Minimum Lot Size / 80 X 150 Avg. Lo Size I I I I I K ENNEDY ROA p - _ / \\ 79.2 gross ac I _ 1 - - -- - -11 �—� EXPANDED Il / I I I DETENTION I — EXISTING - 1 - -- DETENTION -- j 1 -- --------- I y I, I� RETAIL` 7 LAND USE SUMMARY I - Residential Study Area EXPANDED /� / 'PARLdEL 1 GROSS NET GROSS ACTUAL DETENTION TOWNHOMES I Q � � _ / PARCEL LAND USE AC. AC. DENSITY UNITS UNITS { 63.0 gross ac Q I _ STREET STUB TO THE PARCEL 1 Townhomes 63.0 34.9 4.25 268 I I SOUTH PER REQUEST PARCEL 2 Single Family 79.2 65.5 2.2 174 164 I - - BY PLANNING COMMISSION 142.2 100.4 3.11 442 164 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS MENARDS 1 ( // I'PARK �� - - -10 acres of open space required per 1000 residents 7.0 ac - - - ACCESS TO LAND USE UNITS RESIDENTS/DU # of Residents � ( W 7I HAMMAN LAKE Single Family 174 3.749 652 bedr ooms /DU Town o � �� I •: '_ Townhomes 268 2.196 588 k �_ - - . - -2 bedrooms/ m / DU c J -- 442 1 1240 L11 — � 12.4 acres of land /cash required ~ I EXISTING`` - 10.4 acres of land provided per conceptual plan O - - DETENTION OC - ws . LARGE PARK LOCATE\ 5'H RETAIL + CENTRALLY AND ADJACENT EXHIBIT E -- 1 } -- - TO FUTURE HAMMAN LAKE PARK AREA \ RETAIL CONCEPT PLAN Owner: Menard, Inc. COUNTRYSIDE P.ARKWA,Y —_ - NORTH 4777 Menard Drive - -- Eau Claire, WI 54703 -- -.__ r - 0 200 400 600 I Scale: 1" = 400' *I „ Date: May 2003 SEC Plannin MASTER PLANNING SERVICES MENARDS RESIDENTIAL SHEET FILE: T: \020038- mena \cadfiles PUDsubmittal \E- concept plan.dwg Base mapping compiled from best available information. r. AUSTIN, TEXAS All map data should be considered as preliminary, (512) 246.7003 phone I (512) 246.7703 fax i Yorkville, Illinois in need of verification, and subject to change. This land www.s- plaaning.com 1 -Mall: Info4�secplanning,nom plan is conceptual in nature and does not represent any regulatory approval. Plan is subject to change. LJWM CITY OF YORML L CITY COUNCL - X PUBLIC HEARING tie � -- - - -_—� ' Exhibit # 11 /! RE -ZONE 73.7 AG. F ANNEX and -ZONE � 1 1 •, - + KENNEDY � ROAD- -- - _ 68.5 AC. - I . I - y ` i RETAIL 11 I II MENARDS H - I H I -- - - 0 Ix Ili t II -� t �\ RETAIL -- - - EXHIBIT B - ANNEXATION PARCEL — I RETAIL Owner: Menard, Inc. - -- - - -- COUNTR SiD PARKWAY- - 4777 Menard Drive _ - ` - --mo = NORTH Eau Claire, WI 54703 i _- _`- = ___` --'— �f �-- -_ i 4 200 400 soo Scale: 1" = 400' SEC Planning Consultants Date: May 2003 _... .•.. _ ... MASTER PLANNING SER VICES SHEET FILE: TA020038- mena \cadfles \PUD submittal \B - annexation.dwg MENARDS RESIDENTIAL Base mapping compiled from best available information. AUSTIN, TEXAS All map data should be considered as preliminary, (512) 246.7003 phone 1(512) 246.7703 fax I Yorkville, Illinois www.secplanning.com l E -Mail: info®secplanning.com in need of verification, and subject to change. This land plan is conceptual in nature and does not represent any regulatory approval. Plan is subject to change. II UNITT1 =d CITY OFVORKV#LI 25' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT CIT .E �� . Y COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING � i' 35 " Date: "l 0 94 3 �� Exhibit # 36 j I/ 29 30 / 118 99 \ � 117 W - ,? 8 � 118 119 ♦. "41 \ PARCEL 2 ,,, ,as t22 12,000 S.F. Minimum Lot Size 23 24 ,is ~ ,37" \ 134 44 \ 80' x 150' Avg. Lot Size j. KENNEDY ROA 22 "2 ±23 „ � Indicates narrower lot no size t 75' X 160' YP• ) 79.2 gross ac 48 EXPANDED I y_ DETENTION t3 u - � 9_9 e2 ]07u ss 2 ,z7 s2 - " so XISTINGI �• -_: E DETENTIO -_ I i48" 44 / I s5 148 I 88 \ —62 0 , , l� RETAIL 62 " " F I e9 LAND USE SUMMARY RA 3 Residential Study Area " EXPANDED �� 'PARCEL 1 66 /� / 70 -°-" GROSS NET GROSS ACTUAL DETENTION TOWNHOMES Q s " 73 e'_ ) s7 66 PARCEL LAND USE AC. AC. DENSITY UNITS UNITS 63. gross ac "r 4 / 72 PARCEL 1 Townhomes 63.0 34.9 4.25 268 PARCEL 2 Single Family 79.2 — 65.5 2.2 174 164 I 3 - _ 74 7 69 142.2 100.4 3.11 442 164 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS MENARDS �II \ / PARK - ( -10 acres of open space required per 1000 residents F.0 ac LAND USE UNITS RESIDENTS/DU # of Residents) 1 Single Family 174 3.749 652 LINEAR PARK- - -4 bedrooms/ DU I _ Townhomes 268 2.196 588 3.4 ac 25' LANDSCAPE EASEME_NT.. -2 bedrooms /DU n = J � 44 � ii - - -_T --- - i 2 1240 required I I - - - - - 12.4 acres of land /cash re I q - - EXISTING \� - 10.4 acres of land provided per conceptual plan \ DETENTION - _ RETAIL �._ _ - - EXHIBIT C PRELIMINARY PLAN I - RETAIL Owner: Menard, Inc. - -_ COUNTRYSIDE - PARKWAY _ - NORTH 4777 Menard Drive Eau Claire, WI 54703 _ _ - j - 0 200 40 800 Scale: 1" = 400' SEC Planning Consultants Date: May 2003 MASTER PLANNIN G 5ER VICES Iv H S w, A R D RESIDENTIAL " SHEET FILE: T:1020038- mena \cadfiles \PUD submittal \C - preliminary plan.dwg M E Base mapping compiled from best available information. AUSTIN, TEXAS All map data should be considered as preliminary, ( 512) 246.7003 phone 1(512) 246.7703 fax 1 Yorkville Illinois in need of verification, and subject to change. This land www.secplanning.com I E -Mail: info ®secplanning.com plan Is Conceptual In nature and does not represent any regulatory approval. Plan is subject to change. UNITE CITY 0, + CITY OF YORKVILLE CI ! f l 1�1ML PUBLL <ANG EXHIBIT H Date: _'L a 03 Exhibit # -PERMITTED VARIATIONS AND DESIGN STANDARDS - PC # 1. LOT WIDTHS (less than standard of 80' minimum width in R2 district) Lot #77 - Width of 70.8 ft. Lot size of 12,762 sf. Lot #78 - Width of 75.0 ft. Lot size of 13,628 sf Lot #143 - Width of 74.0 ft. Lot size of 12,726 sf Lot #144 - Width of 74.0 ft. Lot size of 13,510 sf 2. DEPTH OF DETENTION "Storm water storage depth of 6 feet between normal water elevation and high water elevation" in the storm water management facility. 3. PRIVATE STREETS IN TOWNHOMES to' , 26' to' , ` UTILITYCASCMENT ACCESSEASEMENT UTILITYEASEMENT 26 , BACK TO BACK OF CURB 2.0'M 2. tlYa STORM O ssweR 1 3' \ — WATERMAIN ' TYPICAL SECTION O (PRIVATE STREET) SANITARY SEWER �\ UNITED CITY OF YORKVRi E l CITY COUNCIL. PUBLIC HEARING i A �. a c - - Exhibit # 5 COMMUNITY ENTRY - ENTRY COLUMN AND LANDSCAPE " SIGNAGE AND ��, .- BED LOCATED WITHIN 25' i PC .# \ LANDSCAPING LANDSCAPE EASEMENT PARCEL 2 12,000 S.F. Minimum Lot Size t S - - �� 80' x 150' l � � MARKETING SIGNAGE A �I � O - -_ � ' Avg. Lot Size �� KENNEDY .Ri — - _ 79.2 gross ac Eil" _ __ C�> = 1 �. ..EXPANDED DETENTION _ �� Q EXISTING DETENTION' -- _. l _ RETAIL EXPANDED ,i 'PARCEL 1 I i I DETENTION /_ T-OWNHOMES 63.0 gross Q l _ C - NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRY 1 © SIGNAGE WITH LANDSCAPING NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRY COLUMN 2 Zld.` _ i � WITH LANDSCAPE BED MENARDS Ill PARK D O I\ 7.0 ac Q MARKETING SIGNAGE ACCESS To ©o i HAMMAN LAKE - �EXISTING - - -, ' - - I l i - \ �.. - - - -- _` - --_ I II I. p I ' \ DETENTION N ENTRY COLUMN AND I RETAIL � .- LANDSCAPE BED `; EXHIBIT G SIGNAGE LOCATION MA - - - \ OCA P RETAIL Owner: 1 11 I� o� _ SI - d p j - Menard, Inc. COUNTRYSIDE PgRKWAY - MARKETING SIGNAGE 4777 Menard Drive NORTH 0 200 400 600 �— °, Eau Claire, WI 54703 — _— Scale: 1" = 400' SEC Planning Consultants Date: May 2003 MASTER PLANNING SERV ICES MENARDS RESIDENTIAL SHEET FILE: T: \020D38- mena \cadfiles \PUD submittal \G- sig Base mapping co nage.dwg I mpiled from best available information. All map data AUSTIN, TEXAS should be considered as preliminary, in need of verification, and ( 512) 246.7003 phone l c512) 246.7703 fax l Yorkville, Illinois www— planning.com E -Mail: info ®secplanning.com subject to change. This land plan is conceptual in nature and does not represent any regulatory approval. Plan is subject to change. UNITED CITY OFYORKVILLE �� j RESERVED RIGHT OF WAY FOR \C, CIT`" °l °OIL EXPANSION OF KENNEDY ROAD 25' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT TO BE USED FOR BERMING AND LANDSCAPE PUBL :ING I - TREATMENTS AS A BUFFER BETWEEN Date: �, a -- I �3 ENTRY COLUMN WITH \ 35 3a SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND # LANDSCAPE BED - Vi KENNEDY ROAD 1 . Exhi /� 33 37 # ��`� �" COMMUNITY ENTRANCE WITH MONUMENT — P p / 31 32 36 39 LANDSCAPE EASEMENT TO BE \.A , SIGNS AND LANDSCAPING QO 90 y 117 qe INCLUDED WITHIN THE LOTS 8 116 119 41 r\ 27 BERMS TO BE �! 121 3' -4' TALL ,22 1i8 49 ?q BERMS TO BE SHAPED AND LANDSCAPING 19 184 4a ll 1s '.22 p 7 ��- _ _ - Y TO BE INSTALLED BY DEVELOPER, LONG 153 132 ; TER M MAINTENANCE TO BE DONE BY ,ss' 15 uo . as `,,� HOME OWNER 's 92 151 DETENTION 1a _ J 107' ' ,zs af� — I ,1156 ._1s0 :i42; 30 127 \ 52 1 f 157 10 I sa 95 10 - 85_. - 98 ID9 159 � 147 145 58 ss - i /84 160 '57 `R3 9 7 �mz u6 5 TOWNHOMES s 63 101 s1 se r 98 62 60 I.' 163 164 ' f I t01L- 89 9 a 5 80 4 79 � - ' 70 71 66 r 8 'f 78 72 4 - B9 75 74 73 - 8 i r 25' LA NDSCAPE` E SEMENT TO BE USED FOR BEAMING 'AND LANDSCAPE TREATMENTS AS A Il, R3 BUFFER .BETWEEN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND �- TOWNHOMES - s ,�' MCHUGH�ROAD'. X �� _ NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRANCE WITH EXHIBIT C -1 - - MONUMENT SIGNS AN b; LANDSCAPING � '�� PRELIMINARY �� _ f -- _ -, __ \�\ - - - LANDSCAPE PLAN - Owner: \\ Menard, Inc. J i i 4777 Menard Drive -- NORTH Eau Claire, WI 54703 — . — - -�- v -- �. _ -— �� - - ��0 40 00 Scale: 1" = 400' SEC Planning Consultants Date: May 2003 MASTER PLANNING SERVICES M E N A R D S RESIDENTIAL Base mapping FILE: T: \020038- mena \cadfiles\PUD submittal \C7 - landscape plan.dwg compiled from best available information. All map data AUSTIN, TEXAS should be considered as preliminary, in need of verification, and (512) 246.7003 phone 1. (5, 2) 246.7703 fax I Yorkville, Illinois subject to change. This land plan is conceptual in nature and does www.secplanning.com E -Mail: info ®secplanning.com not represent any regulatory approval. Plan is subject to change. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILL.E CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC BEARING Date: sl y "O KEN NEpY ROAp w! 0-00 — TYPICAL 400' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT PLANT LIST ' ��, r ° # PLANTS TYPE SIZE PLANT LIST r ® 25' Easement R•o:w 5 Large Shade 3" cal. Red Maple S Large Shade � _ „' i Trees Bradford Pear Tree >•s -mo a W _ g Silver Linden w " Everg Austrian Pine Ever 8erm — Trees 12 en 8 ht. o R.o:w• 4 " Trees Ce e Eve rgreen ' Black Hills Spruc Norway Spru Or na ntal� _ White Pine _ r I _ p ° .. , �' �'% - as 36 Ornamental 6' ht. Cookspur Hawthorne Trees Downy Hawthorne " _Ea Star Magnolia -- Redbud 1 .� �Residential---, TYPICAL 400' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT SCALE V =50' l PAVEMENT �l - RES ERVED R.O.W. FOR 3'-4' BERM EXPANSION OF LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY KENNEDY ROAD EASEMENT TYPICAL LANDSCAPE EASEMENT SECTION ALONG KENNEDY ROAD EXHIBIT C -2 Owner SCALE 1 " =10' PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE Menard, Inc. PLAN - KENNEDY ROAD 4777 Menard Drive Eau Claire, WI 54703 NORTH SEC Planning Consultants Date: May 2003 MASTER PLANNING $ERV/CES SHEET FILE: TA020038- MENA \cadfiles \PUD submittaIM- landscape plan- kennedy.dwg M E NARD S RESIDENTIAL Base mapping compiled from best available information. AUSTIN, TEXAS All map data should be considered as preliminary, in (512) 246.7003 phone I (512) 246,7709 fax I Yorkville Illinois need of verification, and subject to change. This land L--'` wwwsecplanning.com I E -Mail: info ®secplanning.com plan is conceptual in nature and does not represent any regulatory approval. Plan is subject to change. f \ UNITED CITY OF YORMLLE \\ 25' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT CITY COUNCIL - \\1 PUBLIC HEARING - C 32 38 _ i r _- �`� iPG � �' _ - l . _ _I_ 30 118 88 29 40 \ 117 P � / 2e ne 1,9 41 / 27 20 1 36 PARCEL 2 / 26 - 115 1 121 \ a 25 ,,, ,35 122 43 12,000 S.F. Minimum Lot Size - D O _ -- 24 -- 134 47 44 _ \ 80' x 150' Avg. Lot Size f " ` 23 413. 137 _� - 1lENNE Ri_ AD - `� 22 t12 - 123 - - 79.2 gross ac I � ,9 20 21 11, 138 133_ I - 18 110 124 45 4fi 109 139 \ 18 17 I - 153 -- 132 - - - >� 154 152 140 _ 125 _ 48 90 91 108 - 155 131 49..: EXPANDED �� 4 I 13 9z 1 � 151 141 126 51 50 DETENTION i 15 ,56 ,39 � 150 142 127 � - 52 _ _ -- ' __.. -- y��j 88 93 106 '�� - _ - - E/�ISTINC`�.... - -- - /�' - 2 87 �- 149 - 143 8 53 �— 2 DETENTION`_— - /l 9a m5 58 --�� 1za 11 5a . I 88 ,46 a4 95 104 56 - 55 - 70 85 159 96 103 j - 147 56 8 84 160 146 57 87 - 102 58 /} \� 7 62 98 ' RETAIL 6 62 80 59 COMMON FACILITIES SUMMARY I. -- y „ 163 81 99 10 BS 164 82 61 DETENTION 20.9 ac. 0 I? / 6 so 64 DEDICATED PARK 10.4 ac. EXPANDED /j PARCEL 1 65 I - + 79 70 DETENTION TOW_ NHOMES AO i O 71 66 LANDSCAPE EASEMENT 1.8 ac. II 63.0 gross ac O 3 7B 67 72 TOTAL COMMON FACILITIES 33.1 ac. 2 73 8 77 8 74 76 75 89 - 7 ji U OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS -10 acres of open space required per 1000 residents MENARDS I'PARK I I I 17.0 ac OtUttltt \ � �� I 1 _ -�_ - ...- .�— LAND USE UNITS RESIDENTS / DU # of Residents) Single Family 174 3.749 652 � I I � - -- -_ - 4 bedrooms/ DU e ,I LINEAR PARK Townhomes 268 2.196 588 - r { O�lltllilailt�tttttt9 I 3.4 ac � A I — — — �I I 25' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT - bedrooms / Du J I 442 1240 w �I I ' I I - 12.4 acres of land /cash required I'. EXISTING I \ - 10.4 acres of land provided per conceptual plan 0 I\ DETENTION RETAIL - - - EXHIBIT J RETAIL COMMON FACILITIES Owner: ` - Menard, Inc. - COUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY— - NORTH 4777 Menard Drive Cla ire, WI 54703 - - -- - - - - -_. - --- -_ - I - - - 0 200 400 800 Eau Cla , - . j _ �_ I r I Scale: 1" = 400' SEC Planning Consultants Date: May 2003 . MASTER PLANNING SERVICES MENARDS RESIDENTIAL S HEET FILE: T: \020038- mena \cadfiles \PUD submittalW- common facilities.tlwg Base mapping compiled from best available information. AUSTIN, TEXAS All map data should be considered as preliminary, s,z) za6.7oo3 phone (s12) 246.7703 rail Yorkville Illinois in need of verification, and subject to change. This land www.secplanning.com I E -Mail: info ®secplanning.com plan is conceptual in nature and does not represent any regulatory approval. Plan is subject to change. 1 / / /��'u a� a�..o�� +ate 7-� �� +avu�•�� +ate. •.i� +a�i -A l j +ate i�.� +a�i�.� �� +.►�•..� �� +avoo � +�� 7oos +��....►� +wu a \\ \ \L\ / t va" w.v.�� w.v.w.� ,► ,w.v.�� w.v.w .► w.v.v� w. •. vs� w.v.�� w.v.» w.v.�� ► w.vsd vv.v.�� f■\�■... \ - // �.. u��puu■/• ��yuum• �. puuu��►• yuum•/. yumu y , urni�� .,unb,��lpun ■q�� ♦yunus�ly ■, \.. \� *O - :e. /�..; .... �1 ±I_�li , , � �, .;. , � �, , , � �, :. �11I!lr.•,:.�1�1_i:._.�1► �, .;. , � �, ., , , � �, ....,,, .. I�Illljljl�� i ►�►all�l l IIII►�° UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ;. �� ►11► 1 11 ►��,? .��.111 I ►o . 6 i�:i:.� 1 6 ; ffl w d ama ti an , ► I11►,� °; WHEREAS, the American Cancer Society is an organization o�, ►NIA �►��:.;:� which raises funds to support researchers who are working to find a -3: ►�� cure for cancer, which continues to be a leadin cause of death; and :'%°'►'111 1 ►� g 11►,� li► WHEREAS that nearly one -third of those who die of cancer ~� ' ►�► - \.•••off' ►►'�� could be saved through early detection and treatment; and ; /.;; H►'i�. °►111 illl ►�� WHEREAS, that more than one -half of all cancers may be D, ►►111 ( ►�,,�;, prevented through healthy lifestyle choices, particularly avoiding 11 ►'1'� tobacco and choosing a low -fat hi fiber diet and �!%'►'1�11 �I f g � t�- � ►::�! WHEREAS the mission of the American Cancer Society is to ►1► ► ► raise funds to support direct services to local cancer patients and to + � 1 �1 1 0 provide prevention and early detection education programs in Kendall • ►jll�' �� ►,; County schools and businesses; and �'I WHEREAS, the American Cancer Society utilizes Volunteers °�� ►1111 ,•,.�, ► „� ! to coordinate and participate in their fimdraising efforts so that more ►j ► ► ►�.; than 75% of the money raised goes directly to support research, and �,►:�� IIIIIh�;• provide services to cancer victims and their families; and �;� ►jljll' ►, WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville supports the 11' ►�� American Cancer Society Lower Fox Valley "Relay For Life” in its��, 111 ►�-- I ► efforts to raise funds to fight cancer, especially through this annual +� 1 ► ►�� "Rela for Life " lo C�:e; ►�1 ll.� y °►011 11111�h• NOW THEREFORE, I, Arthur F. Prochaska, Jr., Mayor of The .;► j11�' ' United City of Yorkville do hereby proclaim June 6th and June 7th, ,,�� - I llj ► ► 2003 "Relay For Life" Days in THE UNITED CITY OF °� ►► '► ►�� =~ YORKVILLE. 1 � I �� l i� 11 ► 1, +�!? Dated this 27 day of May, 2003, A.D. !i, ►4111' ' ► ii i = :'� ;'� " °��' ! •: 1 11 ►,;. �;; «7 ��` . 9 + ► 1 I ' 1 ►iii'• . '' � ; .. �' �� -' i• �a.'!q�� I j'► ►,�;� `,; ,,., '; Arthur F. Prochaska, Jr., Mayor 'lla �I11 ►�'.. -� ? u,. \ ; = + °e ►1114; �'1,1�1•'0�'�� _ �, = . ! :` ` ,�� ` � X10. "!1,+ - :.� ��tir: �' jI1\` �'■:% �'/ � �' e.' �f �I+\` ��% i�f �I1\` �...../' jI 1\` i�r�..// j � .• i �f�I, \`��•.�,j/ \`� / •.�� :; .,:,:,:,. IIL.,:,:,. llt.,:,:,:,, JIL.,:,:,:,.lIL.,:,:,:,.11L.,e; 1IL. /:,; ,.1IL. ■,.,:, o ';;: ..\o o a�• � �rrr► a �rrr• a w•�r► 'j �.•�.� � �r•�. ►� � �r�r• � rrrr► � •nue' \\■oo a� �u.�a + ao.�.� �a + �i � ..►a �.�.�a + -��.�u•�a + ate �.�.►a + ate o�•�a �.�•�•� /I�w/ s _ �_ c-c�� CONTROL DEVELOPERS IN KENDALL CO. To the Editors: When schools are built on donated land from MPI, the burden will still be on all taxpayers including senior citizens on fixed incomes and other residents who do not have school children. MPI is planning 10 parks for Grande Reserve (in Bristol Twp.) And also lots that are too small: parks attract many people from other areas and create over - crowding. Larger lots would allow children to play in their own yards and provide a safer atmosphere. Who pays the taxes for all these parks? I Why is MPI allowed to inconvenience the people living in 9 homes on Sunset Ave. and Bristol Ridge Rd., in River Ridge Subdivision, by joining the road entrance to Grande Reserve with that of Sunset Ave.? This needs to be addressed. Kendall Co. and Bristol Twp. Need to very carefully control housing development! Please do not allow developers to control Kendall Co. MPI already is developing 885 acres in Kendall Co. - Plainfield called Grande Park. Counties to the east - south -west- and north have open space for developments. I K Voice your opinions to endall Co. officials and councils. They need your input! i �,II i Jessica Lee 189 Rickard Dr. West Oswego, IL 60543 I I I i May 13, 2003 Mayor Arthur Prochaska City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Grande Reserve Dear Mayor Prochaska, Enclosed please find a copy of a letter of concern signed by the residents of Lynwood subdivision. This letter addresses some of our concerns about the Grande Reserve development. The original was presented to the Bristol Township Planning and Zoning Board on May 7, 2003. At this time we ask that you share this letter with the City Council, and please keep our concerns in mind as you make your development plans with Moser Enterprises. Thank you, Jessica Lee We the residents of Lynwood subdivision wish to bring the following concerns to your attention regarding the Moser Enterprises development Grande Reserve. Our first concern is the proposed town homes and apartment complex as we feel it will create the following problems: • Decrease our property values • Close in our open area i • Increase population density } Cause on street parking and abandoned cars • The apartments will bring in transients (persons who will not take pride in property appearance because they do not own the property) The residents of Lynwood that we spoke to would like to see only single family homes in Grande Reserve. We would like to point out that of the 4 developments on the Moser web site Grande Reserve is the only one that is not exclusively single family homes. Our second concern is the buffer zone between Grande Reserve and our existing homes, Moser Enterprises has had plenty of time to respond to this issue and still has not provided information as to: • Will the barrier be high enough and wide enough to separate us from Grande Reserve • What will the barrier be (trees, fencing, land berm, etc.)(Most residents feel a land berm with evergreens on top would be nice) • Does their 25' include the .utilities easement or is it in addition to the utilities easement • Why is there no buffer zone between 18 Anna Maria and Grande Reserve? Our third concern is the most recent map shows plans to extend our road Anna Maria into Grande Reserve we do not want this or any of our roads put through because: • This will turn Lynwood subdivision into a short cut to Route 34 • This will endanger the lives of our residents (we have no sidewalks or street lights) • This added traffic will deteriorate our roads and cause added expenses for the township • Lynwood should remain unconnected to Grande Reserve because we are unincorporated Bristol Township and are not a part of City of Yorkville as they will be SIGNED Name Address / 9 � C� , �,,J o a� ' LB '�_ L 'v� Au e ( r lelik o D .� CAS _/ i _mac -�-✓'° �. _ "9�32z� - �lf �`�� 1 � ��" � 6 J C ��,� �R I rc ;ucla rev 5 P4') K_ SIGNED Name Address 03 -2 c Kfi r cJ ko 1" 1-lr-F 7, 4 14 A 4 /Vo 1)v C44 2--s e �U�c *�CtCv.� � � ,o.s\;� 1�e0�f�dn <<t►�vy lvl►� �- 7J Wa T-_ r- 61 r\ t7 In 14 lee V-a A(� 171 Rjc,4- 0,C aj"j L SIGNED Name Address ANA.... /3 Z . 0-�A. wo L r,C A LA-yrc01, YL, tL Ile' y L� r r lnl� _ �9� 'A "/