The URL can be used to link to this page

Economic Development Packet 2019 02-05-19 AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, February 5, 2019 6:00 p.m. City Hall Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL Citizen Comments: Minutes for Correction/Approval: January 2, 2019 New Business: 1. EDC 2019-08 Building Permit Report for December 2018 2. EDC 2019-09 Building Inspection Report for December 2018 3. EDC 2019-10 Property Maintenance Report for December 2018 4. EDC 2019-11 Economic Development Report for January 2019 5. EDC 2019-12 Annual Foreclosure Update 6. EDC 2019-13 204 Boombah Blvd. – Final Plat Request 7. EDC 2019-14 Hively Landscaping – Rezoning Request 8. EDC 2019-15 Raintree Village – Proposed Developer Incentive Agreement 9. EDC 2019-16 Unified Development Ordinance RFP – Recommendation of Contract Award 10. EDC 2019-17 Renewal of Intergovernmental Agreement with Kendall County for Building Inspection Services 11. EDC 2019-18 Parking Regulations - W. Van Emmon St. Old Business: Additional Business: 2018/2019 City Council Goals – Economic Development Committee Goal Priority Staff “Manufacturing and Industrial Development” 1 Bart Olson, Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Erin Willrett, Lynn Dubajic, Eric Dhuse & Brad Sanderson “Downtown Planning” 2 Bart Olson, Krysti Barksdale-Noble & Erin Willrett “Riverfront Development” 3 Bart Olson, Tim Evans & Krysti Barksdale-Noble “Southside Development” 4 Bart Olson, Krysti Barksdale-Noble & Lynn Dubajic “Revenue Growth” 8 Rob Fredrickson, Krysti Barksdale-Noble & Lynn Dubajic “Entrance Signage” 12 Krysti Barksdale-Noble & Erin Willrett United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 www.yorkville.il.us --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. EDC 2019-18 Parking Regulations - W. Van Emmon St. □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Minutes Tracking Number Minutes of the Economic Development Committee – January 2, 2019 Economic Development Committee – February 5, 2019 Majority Committee Approval Minute Taker Name Department Page 1 of 3 DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Wednesday, January 2, 2019, 6:00pm City Conference Room In Attendance: Committee Members Chairman Ken Koch Alderman Jason Peterson Alderman Joel Frieders Absent: Alderman Carlo Colosimo Other City Officials City Administrator Bart Olson Assistant City Administrator Erin Willrett Alderman Chris Funkhouser Community Development Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble Senior Planner Jason Engberg Other Guests Lynn Dubajic, City Consultant The meeting was called to order at 6:00pm by Chairman Ken Koch. Citizen Comments: None Minutes for Correction/Approval: December 4, 2018 The minutes were approved on a unanimous voice vote. New Business 1. EDC 2019-01 Building Permit Report for November 2018 Ms. Noble reported the statistics and said there were 251 new single family home permits as of November and 260 as of December. No further discussion. 2. EDC 2019-02 Building Inspection Report for November 2018 Almost 400 inspections have been done so far and Mr. Ratos will be doing more plumbing inspections. No further discussion. 3. EDC 2019-03 Property Maintenance Report for November 2018 There were 4 cases heard with all being dismissed and Ms. Noble will verify the reasons for the dismissals. Page 2 of 3 4. EDC 2019-04 Economic Development Report for December 2018 Ms. Dubajic reported the following activity: 1. The D & H Ag building on south Rt. 47 is being sold and will re-open as Bridge Street Lumber which will sell specialty reclaimed wood, windows, doors, etc. This will create about 8 jobs. 2. A produce business will open in February selling to restaurants and open to public on Saturday. 3. Hacienda Real and Flight Building to start construction. 4. Grace to open soon. 5. Planet Fitness sales office open. 6. Arby's progressing. 5. EDC 2019-05 Kane County – 9 S. 661 Jeter Road (Rezone) 1.5 Mile Review Mr. Engberg said Kane County Development had a rezoning request within 1.5 miles of Yorkville's boundary and outside of the city's Comprehensive Plan boundary. Five acres of an 82-acre parcel on Jeter Rd., between Galena Rd. and Jericho Rd. will be rezoned from F (farming) to F-1 (rural residential/farming district). The property was purchased by the petitioner Kane County Forest Preserve and the purpose is to preserve historical farmhouses. This moves to PZC on February 13th with the committee's approval. 6. EDC 2019-06 Massage Establishment Text Amendment Changes are being made from licensing and zoning perspectives. Businesses operated by one person must have a license and a commercial occupancy permit. An existing business submitted a permit showing an “O” office district and at this time, massage businesses are only allowed in Business districts B-1 through B-4. Office districts allows medical clinics, chiropractors so staff is proposing to allow a massage businesses in O. This will go to Public Hearing at PZC on February 13th. The committee was OK with this and Mr. Olson said Public Safety will review the content changes. He said 2-3 of the current sole proprietors have no room for lobbies or they rent a single unit in a larger building. He also said some of these proprietors have other concerns regarding fees and background checks, but the city is not addressing those at this time. The fees were clarified to be $500 for the annual fee and $50 per chair per year. 7. EDC 2019-07 Neighborhood Design Manual This project resulted from the 2016 Comprehensive Plan and focused on the historical areas of Yorkville and guidance for preservation. The project was done by a Master's Degree candidate, Tony Heath, who is also an engineer and has architecture experience. He took photos, did research and went door to door. The manual includes the boundaries of the area, maintenance issues for these homes and renovation suggestions. The manual will not be codified but can serve as a guidebook for preservation. The committee approved the work that was done and it moves to the January 9th PZC meeting to be reviewed. The public will have access to this and a webpage will be created. Other recommendations were made by the Aldermen. Alderman Peterson suggested it would be beneficial to give the manual to potential buyers of these homes and to distribute it to real estate brokers. Other items that need clarification or revision are: Page 3 of 3 address septic systems, define “old” as it pertains to the homes, draft a historic neighborhood definition, eliminate dollar figures since there is no disclaimer or add a disclaimer, fix links that do not work, change stats on steel roofs and include language to check dryer/lint traps for fire hazards. Other changes can be emailed to Mr. Engberg. An app was created for each home and project. As of now, there are no incentives for these projects and the information pertains only to exterior changes. Old Business None Additional Business None There was no further business and the meeting adjourned at 6:34pm Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #1 Tracking Number EDC 2019-08 Building Permit Report for December 2018 Economic Development Committee – February 5, 2019 N/A N/A N/A Informational None All permits issued in December 2018. D. Weinert Community Development Name Department C:\Users\jbehland\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\Y805XFBK\Dec 2018.doc Prepared by: D Weinert UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUILDING PERMIT REPORT December 2018 TYPES OF PERMITS Number of Permits Issued SFD Single Family Detached B.U.I.L.D Single Family Detached 1/1/12 thru 12/31/17 SFA Single Family Attached Multi- Family Apartments Condominiums Commercial Includes all Permits Issued for Commercial Use Industrial Misc. Construction Cost Permit Fees December 2018 31 9 0 0 0 5 0 17 2,016,829.00 84,900.80 Calendar Year 2018 1005 210 14 36 0 130 0 615 55,529,975.00 2,523,390.39 Fiscal Period 2019 698 169 0 0 0 74 0 455 39,294,783.00 1,443,181.28 December 2017 49 9 1 12 0 10 0 17 3,031,142.00 285,721.30 Calendar Year 2017 930 69 85 12 1 155 0 608 70,056,246.00 2,622,579.27 Fiscal Period 2018 697 53 57 12 1 111 0 463 59,462,902.00 2,033,109.74 December 2016 31 0 6 0 0 5 0 20 1,576,272.00 101,679.76 Calendar Year 2016 855 46 105 0 0 121 0 573 36,639,237.00 1,843,802.42 Fiscal period 2017 634 39 76 0 0 80 0 439 28,157,061.00 1,380,584.08 December 2015 25 0 5 0 0 6 0 14 1,344,184.00 83,994.95 Calendar Year 2015 605 8 76 0 0 132 0 389 49,791,115.00 1,211,968.84 Fiscal Period 2016 459 7 54 0 0 95 0 303 14,255,105.00 821,731.08 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #2 Tracking Number EDC 2019-09 Building Inspection Report for December 2018 Economic Development Committee – February 5, 2019 N/A N/A N/A Informational None All inspections scheduled in December 2018. D. Weinert Community Development Name Department DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF _____ 050-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20170301 4040 CANNONBALL TR 12/05/2018Comments1: CEDARHURST 2ND FLOOR CORRIDOR, GREAT ROOComments2: M 134, 135, 136, NURSES ROOM 138, 139 ANComments3: D SALON ROOM 159BF _____ 051-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/05/2018Comments1: SAME AREAS AS THE ROUGH ELECTRIC.- NOT RComments2: EADYBF _____ 052-REI REINSPECTION 12/12/2018Comments1: MECHANICAL FIRST FLOOR SOFFIT AREAS, CEDComments2: ARHURSTBF _____ 053-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/17/2018Comments1: CEDARHURST REINSPECTION, LOBBY, DIRECTORComments2: 'S OFFICE & ACTIVITY ROOM, METAL SOFFITBF _____ 054-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/19/2018Comments1: CEDARHURST, DINING ROOM SEE INSPECTION SComments2: HEETEEI _____ 019-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20170577 1006 S CARLY CIR 112 12/13/2018Comments1: PROPERTY CORNERSEEI _____ 021-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20170648 927 N CARLY CIR 128 12/13/2018Comments1: NO TREE, PROPERTY CORNERS, CRACKED SW SQComments2: UAREEEI _____ 019-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20170859 982 N CARLY CIR 57 12/13/2018Comments1: PROPERTY PINS NO COVER ON BBOXBF _____ 014-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20170900 1926 RENA LN 11 12/12/2018Comments1: WALKS COMPLETE COMPACTION OF STONE BASE,Comments2: BASE MUST BE MIN OF 3" PRIOR TO POURINGBF _____ 015-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20170901 1924 RENA LN 11 12/12/2018Comments1: WALKS COMPLETE COMPACTION OF STONE BASE,Comments2: BASE MUST BE MIN OF 3" PRIOR TO POURINGBF _____ 015-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20170902 1922 RENA LN 11 12/12/2018Comments1: WALKS COMPLETE COMPACTION OF STONE BASE,Comments2: BASE MUST BE MIN OF 3" PRIOR TO POURINGComments3: WALKSBF _____ 014-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20170903 1928 RENA LN 11 12/12/2018Comments1: WALKS COMPLETE COMPACTION OF STONE BASE,Comments2: BASE MUST BE MIN OF 3" PRIOR TO POURING DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF _____ 015-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20170904 1920 RENA LN 11 12/12/2018Comments1: WALKS COMPLETE COMPACTION OF STONE BASE,Comments2: BASE MUST BE MIN OF 3" PRIOR TO POURINGBF _____ 015-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20170905 1932 RENA LN 11 12/12/2018Comments1: WALKS COMPLETE COMPACTION OF STONE BASE,Comments2: BASE MUST BE MIN OF 3" PRIOR TO POURINGBF _____ 014-REI REINSPECTION 20170906 1902 RENA LN 12 12/12/2018Comments1: BUILDING FINAL (REFER TO BF TICKET 24865Comments2: 9 11-29-18)BF _____ 015-REI REINSPECTION 20170907 1912 RENA LN 12 12/12/2018Comments1: BUILDING FINAL (REFER TO BF TICKET 24865Comments2: 9 11-29-18)BF _____ 014-REI REINSPECTION 20170908 1904 RENA LN 12 12/12/2018Comments1: BUILDING FINAL (REFER TO BF TICKET 24865Comments2: 9 11-29-18)BF _____ 014-REI REINSPECTION 20170909 1910 RENA LN 12 12/12/2018Comments1: BUILDING FINAL (REFER TO BF TICKET 24865Comments2: 9 11-29-18)BF _____ 014-REI REINSPECTION 20170910 1908 RENA LN 12 12/12/2018Comments1: BUILDING FINAL (REFER TO BF TICKET 24865Comments2: 9 11-29-18)BF _____ 014-REI REINSPECTION 20170911 1906 RENA LN 12 12/12/2018Comments1: BUILDING FINAL (REFER TO BF TICKET 24865Comments2: 9 11-29-18)BF _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 20170926 3146 MATLOCK DR 672 12/11/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDPR _____ 004-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 12/11/2018PR _____ 005-WAT WATER 12/11/2018BF _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 20170927 3142 MATLOCK DR 673 12/21/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDBF _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 12/28/2018Comments1: UPLAND GRBF _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170928 3152 MATLOCK DR 671 12/06/2018Comments1: GR HORTON DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/06/2018EEI _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/07/2018BF _____ 008-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20170937 3137 MATLOCK DR 653 12/05/2018BC _____ 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 12/05/2018BC _____ 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/05/2018BC _____ 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/05/2018BF _____ 012-INS INSULATION 12/07/2018BF _____ 013-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20170964 1942 RENA LN 10 12/13/2018Comments1: WALKBF _____ 012-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20170965 1944 RENA LN 10 12/12/2018Comments1: NOT READY BRACING NOT COMPLETE, STONE BAComments2: SE MUST BE A MIN OF 3" PRIOR TO POURINGBF _____ 013-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 12/13/2018Comments1: WALKBF _____ 012-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20170966 1946 RENA LN 10 12/12/2018Comments1: NOT READY BRACING NOT COMPLETE, STONE BAComments2: SE MUST BE A MIN OF 3" PRIOR TO POURINGBF _____ 013-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 12/13/2018Comments1: WALKBF _____ 012-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20170967 1948 RENA LN 10 12/12/2018Comments1: NOT READY BRACING NOT COMPLETE, STONE BAComments2: SE MUST BE A MIN OF 3" PRIOR TO POURINGBF _____ 013-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 12/13/2018Comments1: WALKBF _____ 013-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20170968 1952 RENA LN 10 12/12/2018Comments1: NOT READY BRACING NOT COMPLETE, STONE BAComments2: SE MUST BE A MIN OF 3" PRIOR TO POURINGBF _____ 014-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 12/13/2018Comments1: WALKBF _____ 014-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20170969 1954 RENA LN 10 12/12/2018Comments1: NOT READY BRACING NOT COMPLETE, STONE BAComments2: SE MUST BE A MIN OF 3" PRIOR TO POURING DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF _____ 015-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 12/13/2018Comments1: WALKBF _____ 012-INS INSULATION 20170970 1968 RENA LN 9 12/05/2018Comments1: ABBY PROPSBF _____ 013-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 12/12/2018Comments1: NOT READY BRACING NOT COMPLETE, STONE BAComments2: SE MUST BE A MIN OF 3" PRIOR TO POURINGBF _____ 014-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 12/13/2018Comments1: WALKBF _____ 012-INS INSULATION 20170971 1966 RENA LN 9 12/05/2018BF _____ 012-INS INSULATION 20170972 1974 RENA LN 9 12/05/2018BF _____ 011-INS INSULATION 20170973 1962 RENA LN 9 12/05/2018BF _____ 011-INS INSULATION 20170974 1972 RENA LN 9 12/05/2018BF _____ 012-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 12/12/2018Comments1: NOT READY BRACING NOT COMPLETE, STONE BAComments2: SE MUST BE A MIN OF 3" PRIOR TO POURINGBF _____ 013-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 12/13/2018Comments1: WALKBF _____ 011-INS INSULATION 20170975 1964 RENA LN 9 12/05/2018BF _____ 005-REI REINSPECTION 20180075 1311 CAROLYN CT 6 12/03/2018Comments1: PRE POUR SLABBF _____ 005-REI REINSPECTION 20180076 1303 CAROLYN CT 6 12/03/2018Comments1: PRE POURBF _____ 005-REI REINSPECTION 20180077 1309 CAROLYN CT 6 12/03/2018Comments1: PRE POURBF _____ 005-REI REINSPECTION 20180078 1305 CAROLYN CT 6 12/03/2018Comments1: PRE POURBF _____ 005-REI REINSPECTION 20180079 1307 CAROLYN CT 6 12/03/2018Comments1: PRE POURBC _____ 004-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20180081 1321 CAROLYN CT 5 12/06/2018BC _____ 004-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20180082 1323 CAROLYN CT 5 12/06/2018 DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 004-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20180083 1325 CAROLYN CT 5 12/06/2018BC _____ 004-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20180084 1327 CAROLYN CT 5 12/06/2018BC _____ 004-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20180085 1329 CAROLYN CT 5 12/06/2018BC _____ 004-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20180086 1331 CAROLYN CT 5 12/06/2018GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180100 3376 RYAN DR 64 12/13/2018Comments1: COULD NOT FULLY INSPECT - COULD ONLY ACCComments2: ESS FRONTGH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180107 2923 GRANDE TR 380 12/14/2018GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180138 1311 WILLOW WAY 219 12/13/2018GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180194 492 HONEYSUCKLE LN 165 12/13/2018BF _____ 012-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180200 8710 RT 71 12/13/2018Comments1: ELECTRIC RESTORE CHURCH-SEE INSPECTION RComments2: EPORTBF _____ 003-FOU FOUNDATION 20180208 3121 LAUREN DR 91 12/04/2018Comments1: CAL MIDWESTBC _____ 004-BKF BACKFILL 12/10/2018Comments1: CAL MIDWESTPR _____ 005-SEW SEWER INSPECTION 12/11/2018PBF _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 12/18/2018Comments1: CAL RYANBC _____ 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 12/17/2018BC _____ 006-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180218 171 SARAVANOS DR 6 12/11/2018BC _____ 007-INS INSULATION 12/21/2018Comments1: FOAM AROUND WINDOWS AND DOORS BEFORE INSComments2: TALLING DRYWALLBC _____ 022-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180242 1835 MARKETVIEW DR 7 12/07/2018PR _____ 023-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/04/2018BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180288 307 CENTER PKWY 20 12/18/2018BF _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 20180330 3126 MATLOCK DR 677 12/11/2018Comments1: GR UPLAND DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 004-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 12/11/2018PR _____ 005-WAT WATER 12/11/2018BF _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 20180331 3122 MATLOCK DR 679 12/26/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDBC _____ 008-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20180333 3053 JUSTICE DR 633 12/13/2018BC _____ 008-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20180334 3075 JUSTICE DR 634 12/13/2018BC _____ 013-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20180335 3097 MATLOCK DR 635 12/13/2018BF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180336 3106 MATLOCK DR 681 12/03/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDBC _____ 007-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20180337 3021 JUSTICE DR 632 12/13/2018GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180344 2909 GRANDE TR 377 12/14/2018BC _____ 012-INS INSULATION 20180360 3132 MATLOCK DR 675 12/03/2018BF _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180361 3133 MATLOCK DR 652 12/13/2018Comments1: GR HORTONBF _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/13/2018Comments1: GR HORTONBF _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/13/2018Comments1: GR HORTONPBF _____ 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 12/13/2018Comments1: GR HORTONBC _____ 012-INS INSULATION 12/17/2018BC _____ 007-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20180362 3105 MATLOCK DR 636 12/13/2018BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180364 3102 MATLOCK DR 682 12/21/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDBF _____ 018-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180386 2505 LYMAN LOOP 78 12/18/2018Comments1: GR PULTEPBF _____ 019-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/18/2018Comments1: GR PULTEEEI _____ 020-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/18/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONS CORNER LOT DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180404 316 E FOX ST 12/17/2018BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180405 308 W DOLPH ST 12/17/2018GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180413 348 BERTRAM DR 1154 12/13/2018GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180422 4474 SARASOTA AVE 1041 12/13/2018GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180431 1032 WHITE PLAINS LN 55 12/13/2018Comments1: COULD NOT FULLY INSPECT - COULD ONLY ACCComments2: ESS FRONTGH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180432 308 WESTWIND DR 2 12/14/2018Comments1: ALUMINUM FENCEGH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180440 331 WESTWIND DR 34 12/14/2018GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180454 2758 CRANSTON CIR 110 12/14/2018Comments1: BACK SECTION OF FENCE DIFFERENT STYLE TComments2: HAN SIDES/FRONTBC _____ 008-ABC ABOVE CEILING 20180479 42 W COUNTRYSIDE PKWY 12/03/2018BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180480 115 E WASHINGTON ST 12/17/2018BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180483 309 E SOMONAUK ST 12 12/17/2018BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180484 102 W FOX ST 12/13/2018BKF _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 12/13/2018BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180488 201 W CENTER ST 12/17/2018GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180494 465 SHADOW WOOD DR 33 12/13/2018BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180500 532 BUCKTHORN CT 82 12/18/2018BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180513 215 HILLCREST AVE 8 12/18/2018BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180514 208 W FOX ST 12/17/2018GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180526 105 W CENTER ST 12/14/2018Comments1: MISSED NAILING APPROX 9 PICKETS AT BOTTOComments2: M - EAST SIDE BY BIG TREEGH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180527 3405 RYAN DR 10 12/13/2018Comments1: GATE ON LEFT SIDE OF HOUSE DRAGS ON GROComments2: UND, COULD BE DUE TO FROST HEAVING GROUNComments3: D. COULD NOT FULLY INSPECT, COULD ONLY AComments4: CCESS FRONT. DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180545 1122 CARLY DR 25 12/04/2018PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/04/2018BF _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 20180547 3124 MATLOCK DR 678 12/20/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDBF _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 12/28/2018Comments1: UPLAND GRBC _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180548 3128 MATLOCK DR 676 12/20/2018BC _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/20/2018BC _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/20/2018PR _____ 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 12/20/2018BC _____ 012-INS INSULATION 12/26/2018BC _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180557 1206 CANNONBALL TR 3 12/27/2018PBF _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/27/2018Comments1: BLACKBERRY WOODS MCCUEEEI _____ 019-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/27/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONSGH _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180579 504 W FOX RD 12/14/2018BF _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180593 2628 MCLELLAN BLVD 58 12/17/2018PBF _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/17/2018EEI _____ 019-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/18/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONSBF _____ 019-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180594 2631 BURR ST 81 12/11/2018Comments1: GR PULTEPBF _____ 020-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/11/2018Comments1: GR PULTEEEI _____ 021-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/12/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONS OK TO TEMPBC _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180595 2622 BURR ST 14 12/05/2018 DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/05/2018EEI _____ 019-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/05/2018PBF _____ 001-WAT WATER 20180617 2821 SHERIDAN CT 206 12/12/2018Comments1: GR WINNINGERBC _____ 002-FTG FOOTING 12/13/2018BC _____ 003-FOU FOUNDATION 12/14/2018BF _____ 004-BKF BACKFILL 12/19/2018Comments1: GR MIDWESTBC _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180661 2721 PHELPS CT 267 12/19/2018Comments1: FIRE FOAM 2 1/2" GAS PIPE PENETRATIONS FComments2: ROM BASEMENT. TIGHTEN SUPPORT BEAM BOLTSComments3: IN BASEMENTPR _____ 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/19/2018EEI _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/19/2018BC _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180682 1441 WOODSAGE AVE 21 12/11/2018EEI _____ 018-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/11/2018PR _____ 019-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/11/2018BF _____ 012-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180696 4294 E MILLBROOK CIR 277 12/20/2018Comments1: GR RYANPBF _____ 013-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/20/2018Comments1: GR RYANEEI _____ 014-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/20/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONSBC _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180701 742 KENTSHIRE DR 116 12/20/2018PR _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/20/2018EEI _____ 019-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/20/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONSBC _____ 013-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180720 2843 KETCHUM CT 219 12/03/2018Comments1: SCUTTLE COVER IN MASTER BR CLOSET NOT YEComments2: T INSTALLED DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 014-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/03/2018EEI _____ 015-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/03/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONS OK TO TEMPBC _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180724 826 ALEXANDRA LN 33 12/05/2018PR _____ 017-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/05/2018EEI _____ 018-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/05/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONS OK TO TEMPBC _____ 013-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180736 3333 CALEDONIA DR 19 12/26/2018PBF _____ 014-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/26/2018Comments1: CAL RYANEEI _____ 015-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/26/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONS OK TO TEMPBC _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180738 3101 LAUREN DR 93 12/11/2018PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/11/2018EEI _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/11/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONS OK TO TEMP $5000PBF _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 20180739 2846 KETCHUM CT 211 12/12/2018Comments1: GR RYANBC _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 12/12/2018EEI _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/11/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONS OK TO TEMP $5000BC _____ AM 004-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180742 2934 OLD GLORY DR 268 12/19/2018Comments1: KITCHEN REMODELPBF _____ 005-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/19/2018Comments1: KITCHEN REMODEL, GRPR _____ 015-SUM SUMP 20180744 510 WINDETT RIDGE RD 173 12/20/2018BF _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 20180745 821 CAULFIELD PT 108 12/05/2018Comments1: WIN COMEXPR _____ AM 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 12/10/2018 DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20180746 732 KENTSHIRE DR 117 12/04/2018BC _____ 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 12/04/2018Comments1: NAIL STAIR TO STUDS 1ST FLOOR, INSTALL AComments2: NCHOR BOLTS GARAGE, AF103.12 POWER SOURCComments3: E NEEDED IN ATTIC FOR FUTURE INSTALLATIOComments4: N OF RADON VENT PIPE FANBC _____ 012-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/04/2018BC _____ 013-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/04/2018BC _____ 014-INS INSULATION 12/06/2018Comments1: INSULATE TOP & BOTTOM OF BUMPOUT IN GARAComments2: GEBF _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 20180747 2352 WINTERTHUR GREEN 181 12/05/2018Comments1: WIN COMEX-NOT READYBC _____ 003-REI REINSPECTION 12/06/2018Comments1: FOUNDATION COMEX PM PLEASEPR _____ 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 12/11/2018Comments1: CANCELLED VERUNABF _____ 005-BKF BACKFILL 12/13/2018Comments1: COMEXPBF _____ 006-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 12/19/2018Comments1: VERUNAPBF _____ 014-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 20180754 828 ALEXANDRA LN 34 12/20/2018Comments1: HEARTLAND MEADOWS MARKEREEI _____ 015-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/19/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONSBC _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 12/20/2018BC _____ 017-REI REINSPECTION 12/21/2018Comments1: FINAL ELECBC _____ 013-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180769 3102 LAUREN DR 107 12/20/2018PBF _____ 014-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/20/2018Comments1: CAL RYANEEI _____ 015-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/20/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONS DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 008-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20180771 2688 MCLELLAN BLVD 52 12/07/2018BF _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/07/2018BF _____ 010-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 12/07/2018Comments1: TIGHTEN NUTS/BOLTS ON ALL BASEMENT I-BEAComments2: MS, BOLT DOWN ALL GARAGE PLATES BOTH SIDComments3: ES MISSING NUTSBF _____ 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/07/2018Comments1: GR PPULTEBF _____ 012-INS INSULATION 12/11/2018Comments1: GR PULTEBC _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180774 2639 BURR ST 82 12/18/2018BC _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/18/2018BC _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/18/2018PBF _____ 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 12/18/2018BF _____ 012-INS INSULATION 12/20/2018BF _____ AM 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180776 2009 SHETLAND CT 36 12/26/2018Comments1: KHOV PRESTWICKEEI _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/26/2018Comments1: MODEL-- BBOX KEYABLE, OSR INSTALLEDPBF _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/26/2018Comments1: PRESTWICK KHOV THIS IS A MODEL HOME WILComments2: L NOT NEED OCCUPANCYGH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180780 1189 WALSH DR 125 12/14/2018Comments1: ALUMINUM FENCE - BACK GATE DRAGS ON GROUComments2: NDBF _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180787 3148 BOOMBAH BLVD 128 12/12/2018PBF _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/12/2018Comments1: CAL RYANEEI _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 12/12/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONS, OK TO TEMP $5000BC _____ 012-INS INSULATION 20180794 978 S CARLY CIR 107 12/03/2018Comments1: ANCHOR BOLTS INSTALLED IN GARAGE DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 011-INS INSULATION 20180816 2849 KETCHUM CT 221 12/03/2018EEI _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20180817 3238 BOOMBAH BLVD 138 12/13/2018Comments1: WINTER CONDITIONS, OK TO TEMP $5000BF _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 12/13/2018PBF _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 12/13/2018Comments1: CAL RYANBF _____ 002-FTG FOOTING 20180826 3171 LAUREN DR 86 12/04/2018Comments1: CAL MIDWESTBF _____ 003-FOU FOUNDATION 12/05/2018Comments1: CAL MIDWEST-NOT READYBC _____ 004-REI REINSPECTION 12/05/2018Comments1: FOUNDATION WALLBF _____ 005-BKF BACKFILL 12/11/2018Comments1: CAL MIDWESTPR _____ 006-SEW SEWER INSPECTION 12/11/2018PBF _____ 007-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 12/18/2018Comments1: CAL RYANBC _____ 008-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 12/17/2018BC _____ 009-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 12/17/2018BC _____ 010-STP STOOP 12/21/2018BC _____ 011-STP STOOP 12/21/2018BC _____ 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180832 2564 OVERLOOK CT 17 12/07/2018BC _____ 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180837 2544 MADDEN CT 11 12/14/2018BC _____ 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180843 103 E MAIN ST 12/07/2018Comments1: ROOF & HEADERSBF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180848 3112 MATLOCK DR 680 11/30/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDBC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 12/27/2018Comments1: GR UPLAND DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF _____ 005-BKF BACKFILL 20180849 4274 E MILLBROOK CIR 280 12/04/2018Comments1: GR MIDWESTPBF _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 12/13/2018Comments1: GR RYANBC _____ 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 12/13/2018BC _____ 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 12/19/2018BC _____ 009-STP STOOP 12/19/2018PBF _____ 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 12/28/2018Comments1: GR RYAN W/STACKBF _____ 011-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/28/2018BF _____ 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/28/2018BF _____ 014-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 12/28/2018BC _____ 009-INS INSULATION 20180850 3352 CALEDONIA DR 145 12/13/2018PBF _____ 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 12/12/2018Comments1: CAL RYANBF _____ 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 12/11/2018BF _____ 012-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/11/2018BF _____ 013-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/11/2018BF _____ 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 20180851 383 FONTANA DR 61 12/03/2018Comments1: CAL BLANKETED, MIDWEST, CRAWLBF _____ 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 12/06/2018Comments1: CAL MIDWESTPBF _____ 009-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 12/17/2018Comments1: CAL RYANBF _____ 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/17/2018Comments1: CAL RYANBF _____ 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 12/17/2018Comments1: CAL RYANBF _____ 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/17/2018Comments1: CAL RYAN DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 013-INS INSULATION 12/19/2018BF _____ 014-STP STOOP 12/13/2018Comments1: CAL MIDWESTPR _____ 008-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20180852 3356 CALEDONIA DR 144 12/07/2018Comments1: STACKBC _____ 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 12/07/2018BC _____ 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/07/2018BC _____ 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/07/2018BC _____ 012-INS INSULATION 12/10/2018PR _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20180861 1041 BLACKBERRY SHORE LN 38 12/03/2018BF _____ 004-FOU FOUNDATION 20180864 762 KENTSHIRE DR 113 12/04/2018BF _____ 005-BKF BACKFILL 12/06/2018Comments1: WIN COMEXPR _____ 006-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 12/11/2018PR _____ PM 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 20180869 2431 FITZHUGH TURN 148 12/07/2018Comments1: WAITING FOR TICKET GOT A VERBAL APPROVALComments2: FROM PETEPR _____ 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20180872 376 E VETERANS PKWY 9 12/03/2018PR _____ 002-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 12/03/2018BC _____ 003-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 12/04/2018BC _____ 004-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/04/2018BC _____ 005-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 12/06/2018PBF _____ 006-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 12/12/2018Comments1: PLANET FITNESSBF _____ 007-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/13/2018Comments1: PLANET FITNESS (IN BATHROOMS)BF _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 12/13/2018Comments1: PLANET FITNESS DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 009-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/26/2018PR _____ AM 003-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 20180874 1559 SYCAMORE RD 12/19/2018Comments1: CAN CUNBC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180875 1835 MARKETVIEW DR 12/10/2018Comments1: MONUMENT SIGNBF _____ 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20180885 3301 LAUREN DR 80 12/11/2018Comments1: & STOOP, CAL MIDWEST, CANCEL GARAGEBF _____ 009-STP STOOP 12/13/2018Comments1: CAL MIDWESTPBF _____ 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 12/20/2018Comments1: STACK, CAL RYANBF _____ 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 12/20/2018BF _____ 012-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/20/2018BF _____ 013-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/20/2018BF _____ 014-INS INSULATION 12/26/2018BC _____ 015-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 12/17/2018BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180891 3127 MATLOCK DR 651 12/14/2018GH _____ 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180905 474 E BARBERRY CIR 140 12/14/2018Comments1: ALUMINUM FENCE - MISSING ONE CAP BY BACComments2: K GATE - TALKED TO H/O AND LET HIM KNOW.BC _____ 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180909 2142 BLUEBIRD LN 254 12/12/2018BC _____ 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/12/2018BC _____ 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12/12/2018PBF _____ 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 12/12/2018Comments1: BASEMENT REMODELBC _____ 005-INS INSULATION 12/26/2018BC 11:30 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20180926 400 BLAINE ST 12/13/2018Comments1: GARAGE,BC _____ 005-BKF BACKFILL 20180927 4282 E MILLBROOK CIR 279 12/03/2018Comments1: GR MIDWEST DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PBF _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 12/13/2018Comments1: GR RYANBC _____ 007-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 12/13/2018BC _____ 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 12/19/2018BC _____ 009-STP STOOP 12/19/2018BF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180935 1911 WREN RD 14 12/06/2018Comments1: UPLAND, THESE FOOTINGS WILL BE READY 10:Comments2: 30-11:00BF _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 12/17/2018Comments1: PW UPLANDBF _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 12/21/2018Comments1: UPLAND PRESTWICKBF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180936 1901 WREN RD 13 12/06/2018Comments1: UPLAND PRESTWICK - WILL BE READY 1030-11Comments2: 00BF _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 12/13/2018Comments1: UPLAND PRESTWICKBF _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 12/21/2018Comments1: UPLAND PRESTWICKBC _____ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20180938 3194 BOOMBAH BLVD 135 12/10/2018BC _____ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20180940 924 STONY CREEK LN 68 12/05/2018BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 12/11/2018PR _____ AM 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20180947 1003 S CARLY CIR 88 12/05/2018BC _____ 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 12/11/2018BC _____ 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 12/11/2018PR _____ 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 12/11/2018BF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180949 4254 E MILLBROOK CIR 283 12/19/2018Comments1: GR MIDWESTBC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 12/21/2018 DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 12/19/2018Comments1: GR WINNINGERBC _____ 004-BKF BACKFILL 12/26/2018BF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180950 4242 E MILLBROOK CIR 285 12/19/2018Comments1: GR MIDWESTBC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 12/21/2018PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 12/19/2018Comments1: GR WINNINGERBC _____ 004-BKF BACKFILL 12/26/2018BC _____ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20180953 1963 MEADOWLARK LN 126 12/12/2018BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 12/21/2018PR _____ 001-WAT WATER 20180956 4234 E MILLBROOK CIR 286 12/05/2018BF _____ 002-FTG FOOTING 12/07/2018Comments1: GR MIDWESTBC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 12/13/2018Comments1: GR MIDWEST BRACE WALLS BEFORE BACKFILLINComments2: GBF _____ 004-FOU FOUNDATION 12/11/2018Comments1: GR MIDWESTPBF _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 12/27/2018BC _____ 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 12/27/2018PR _____ 001-WAT WATER 20180957 4228 E MILLBROOK CIR 287 12/05/2018BF _____ 003-FOU FOUNDATION 12/07/2018Comments1: GR MIDWESTBF _____ 004-BKF BACKFILL 12/12/2018Comments1: GR MIDWESTPBF _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 12/27/2018Comments1: GR RYANBC _____ 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 12/27/2018 DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180964 3101 REHBEHN CT 637 12/17/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDBF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180966 3105 REHBEHN CT 638 12/17/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDBF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180968 3109 REHBEHN CT 639 12/18/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDBF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180969 3121 REHBEHN CT 640 12/18/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDBF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180971 3125 REHBEHN CT 641 12/18/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDBF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180973 3129 REHBEHN CT 642 12/18/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDBF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180975 3133 REHBEHN CT 643 12/20/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDBF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180977 3137 REHBEHN CT 644 12/20/2018Comments1: GR UPLANDBC _____ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20180978 772 HAYDEN DR 63 12/18/2018BC _____ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20180979 794 HAYDEN DR 62 12/18/2018BC 09:00 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20180981 259 COMMERCIAL DR 12/18/2018BC 11:30 001-FTG FOOTING 20180988 508 CENTER PKWY 6B 12/19/2018BF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180992 2093 SQUIRE CIR 218 12/12/2018Comments1: GR RYANPBF _____ 002-WAT WATER 12/12/2018Comments1: WINNINGERBF _____ 003-FOU FOUNDATION 12/13/2018Comments1: MIDWEST GRBF _____ 004-BKF BACKFILL 12/18/2018Comments1: MIDWEST GRBF _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20180996 3287 BOOMBAH BLVD 143 12/28/2018PBF _____ 002-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 12/27/2018Comments1: CAL WINNINGER DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF _____ 003-FOU FOUNDATION 12/31/2018Comments1: CAL MIDWEST WINTER CONDITIONS-PROTECTINGComments2: POURED CONCRETE ABOVE 50 FOR 72 HOURS,Comments3: BLANKETS ON SITEBC _____ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20180998 642 DENISE CT 37 12/06/2018BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 12/14/2018Comments1: 6 PICKETS ON NORTH SIDE OF FENCE HAVE ONComments2: LY 1 NAIL AT TOP STRINGER. 2 ARE REQUIREComments3: D, HOMEWONER NOTIFIED VERBALLYBC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20180999 1439 CHESTNUT LN 79 12/05/2018BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 12/07/2018BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20181000 108 APPLETREE CT 12/26/2018Comments1: WINDOWSBC _____ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20181002 3195 LONGVIEW DR 47 12/13/2018BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 12/18/2018BF _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20181005 2501 LYMAN LOOP 62 12/21/2018Comments1: GR PULTEBC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20181018 1409 ASPEN LN 12/21/2018PR _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20181020 4642 PLYMOUTH AVE 989 12/20/2018 DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: BDO COMMERCIAL BUILD-OUT 2BIP BUILD INCENTIVE PROGRAM SFD 3BSM BASEMENT REMODEL 10CCO COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 2COM COMMERCIAL BUILDING 8CRM COMMERCIAL REMODEL 12DCK DECK 1ESN ELECTRIC SIGN 1FNC FENCE 29FOU FOUNDATION 1GAR GARAGE 1MIS MISCELLANEOUS 1REM REMODEL 2ROF ROOFING 13SFA SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED 44SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 229WIN WINDOW REPLACEMENT 1INSPECTION SUMMARY: ABC ABOVE CEILING 1BKF BACKFILL 19BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 6EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPECTION 23ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 2ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WATER 6FIN FINAL INSPECTION 62FOU FOUNDATION 17FTG FOOTING 23GAR GARAGE FLOOR 6INS INSULATION 21PHD POST HOLE - DECK 5PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 7PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READY 24PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 14PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 9PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 31REI REINSPECTION 15REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 16RFR ROUGH FRAMING 17RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 16ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & WATER 2SEW SEWER INSPECTION 2STP STOOP 6SUM SUMP 1UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 1WAT WATER 8 DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22DATE: 12/31/2018 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22TIME: 12:12:55 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 12/01/2018 TO 12/31/2018INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------INSPECTOR SUMMARY: BC BOB CREADEUR 124BF B&F INSPECTOR CODE SERVICE 128BKF BRISTOL KENDALL FIRE DEPT 1EEI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES 23GH GINA HASTINGS 17PBF BF PLUMBING INSPECTOR 33PR PETER RATOS 34STATUS SUMMARY: C BC 24C BKF 1C EEI 2C GH 17C PR 3I BC 88I BF 121I EEI 2I PBF 23I PR 23T BC 12T BF 7T EEI 19T PBF 10T PR 8REPORT SUMMARY: 360 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #3 Tracking Number EDC 2019-10 Property Maintenance Report for December 2018 Economic Development Committee – February 5, 2019 Informational None Pete Ratos Community Development Name Department Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #4 Tracking Number EDC 2019-11 Economic Development Report for January 2019 Economic Development Committee – February 5, 2019 N/A See attached. Bart Olson Administration Name Department 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 102  Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Phone 630-553-0843  FAX 630-553-0889 Monthly Report – for February 2019 EDC Meeting of the United City of Yorkville January 2019 Activity Downtown Redevelopment: - Worked with a variety of land and building owners to discuss potential development and redevelopment opportunities. - Worked with a variety of businesses looking at Yorkville’s downtown for their new home. Development south of Fox River: - Continue working with Eleno Silva on banquet center. Eleno has begun exterior and interior construction in Stagecoach Crossing. He is focusing on opening in spring of 2019. - Continue working with “Yorkville Animal Hospital” as they prepare for a major expansion of services to the community, which will include a large capital investment. - Continue working with “Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen”, who is leasing the former Subway space along with a portion of adjacent vacant space for a new restaurant with a drive-up at Fountain Village. - Also worked with three other perspectives tenants for Fountain Village. - Working with Paul McCue, owner of Bridge Street Lumber, LLC. Paul has purchased the building at 1111 South Bridge and will be opening “North American Building Supply”. This business will sell windows, doors, cabinetry and millwork to both builders and the public. Development north of the Fox River: - Kendall Crossing…Construction is in full swing for the “Hacienda Real” building, the “Flight Tasting Room & Bottle Shoppe” building, and of course the “Holiday Inn Express & Suites” and “Kendall Banquets”. Continue to meet with other complementary business for the new 7000 square foot building “Grace Coffee, Eats Wine” is on target for opening in February. - Kendall Marketplace…Continue to work with specialist consultants from “Bespoke” who have been hired by center owner, Alex Berman, to work through a plan to determine new options and opportunities for the remainder of the project. Also working with perspective inline tenants, and a national restaurant for new construction on an outlot. - “Arby’s” will begin remodel of the former Hardee’s location on Route 47 in early 2019. Yonas Hagos will purchase this building. - Working with new broker, Daniel Bessey, who is taking over the “Prairie Point Executive Center”. - “C&H Exterior Restorations” has opened at 720 North Bridge Street. This former home based business specializes in windows, sidings and roofing and has created 15 new jobs. - Working with a variety of retail and service based businesses that are exploring opportunities in Yorkville. Some of these businesses are negotiating their leases and, I expect to be able to provide details in the near future. Industrial Development: - Continue working with small industrial user to locate in Yorkville. This business is nationally known and recognized and will create approximately 30 jobs. Recreation: - Go for it Sports…continue working with the center. “Go For It Sports” continues to work with JC Health and Fitness to provide core based functional training; Lil’ Kickers soccer and instructional program; and Chad Johansen and his Golf Academy. Other Activity: - Attended quarterly SBA meeting in Chicago to learn about programs available for area businesses. - Attended quarterly KEDA meeting to discuss opportunities and issues that are facing the communities of Kendall County. Respectfully submitted, Lynn Dubajic 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 102 Yorkville, IL 60560 lynn@dlkllc.com 630-209-7151 cell Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. Informational item. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #5 Tracking Number EDC 2019-12 Annual Foreclosure Tracking Economic Development Committee - February 5, 2019 N/A N/A N/A Annual update on newly filed foreclosures from calendar year 2018. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Below is the foreclosure comparison from calendar year 2018. These results are compared to the same months for 2017 and all data is provided by http://www.public- record.com. Based on these results, the total number of foreclosures decreased slightly from 61 in CY 2017 to 56 in CY 2018. The following graphs illustrate the trend in foreclosures month by month for 2017 and 2018. It also breaks down the amount of foreclosures by ward, subdivision and property type (residential, commercial, vacant land, etc). Month Breakdown: • The number of total foreclosures from 2017 to 2018 decreased by approximately 8%. In total, there were 61 newly filed foreclosures in 2017 and 56 in 2018, a decrease by five (5) less filings. While this represents a marginal decline in new foreclosure filings, the overall effect appears to represent a further stabilization in the housing market for Yorkville. Ward Breakdown: • As indicated in the graph below, Ward 3 continues to have the most foreclosures, both in calendar year 2017 and 2018. However, Ward 3 saw a significant overall decrease in new foreclosures from 24 filings in 2017 to 16 filings in 2018. While the newly-filed foreclosures increased slightly in Ward 1, Ward 4 also saw a slight decrease during calendar year 2018 versus 2017. Ward 2, meanwhile, experienced a significant increase in calendar year 2018 foreclosure filings. The increase of four (4) foreclosures in Ward 2 in 2018 was adequately off-set by the decrease in foreclosures in Ward 3 (-8) and Ward 4 (-2) to reduce the total number of newly filed foreclosures by five (5) from 61 in 2017 to 56 in 2018. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: January 3, 2019 Subject: Annual Foreclosure Update – Calendar Year 2018 Subdivision Breakdown: There were numerous subdivisions throughout the City that recorded newly filed foreclosures. Staff took the top five subdivisions for a comparison and grouped all other subdivisions into the “Other” category. • As indicated in the graph below, Bristol Bay had the highest amount of newly filed foreclosures in both 2017 and 2018. Raintree Village, Grande Reserve and Autumn Creek saw stabilization or an overall decrease in newly filed foreclosures; however, Fox Hill saw a slight uptick in foreclosure filings in 2018. Property Type Breakdown: • As indicated in the graph above, Single Family Residential properties remains the most foreclosured upon unit type in Yorkville with a slight increase in total number of filings from 40 in calendar year 2017 to 43 in 2018. A slight increase was also observed in the Townhome segment; however a significant decrease in foreclosure filings in the Condominium segment was noted. Commercial properties also saw a decline in the number of newly-filed foreclosures, while the Industrial segment remained unchanged. Summary Month Breakdown: The monthly breakdown of foreclosures indicates a fluctuating pattern from month to month in years 2013 and 2017; however, the trend indicates a high number of filings in first half of the year and then a slight increase with a leveling off towards the end of the year in 2018. Ward Breakdown: Ward 3 remains as having the highest amount of newly filed foreclosures of all the wards in Yorkville, although the overall number of filings decreased significantly. Fox Hill, Bristol Bay and Whispering Meadows are a couple of the larger subdivisions within Ward 3, which would indicate the reason for the higher amount of foreclosures. Ward 1 had the second most newly filed foreclosures in 2018, which included foreclosures in the Raintree and Windett Ridge subdivisions. Ward 2, generally located within the downtown/older part of town and would normally show a stronger stability in the foreclosure market, saw the biggest jump in foreclosure filings this year. Subdivision Breakdown: Bristol Bay had the highest amount of newly file foreclosures in calendar year 2018 which is understandable with its mix of single family residences, townhomes and condominiums. Therefore, it would point towards a higher rate of foreclosures compared to other subdivisions. However, it is important to note, the number of foreclosures decreased in Bristol Bay from eleven (11) in 2017, to eight (8) in 2018. Staff will continue to closely monitor the Bristol Bay subdivision for any future trends in significant increases or decreases in foreclosures. Property Type Breakdown: The largest amount of newly filed foreclosures in calendar year 2018 continues to be single family residences. Since a majority of the housing stock in Yorkville is single family detached, this statistic is anticipated. Future Trends: According to RealtyTrac (http://www.realtytrac.com/statsandtrends/foreclosuretrends/il), Illinois has a newly filed foreclosure rate of 1 in every 1,420 (down from 1 in every 1,196 in 2017). In 2018, Kendall County is no longer ranked in the top 5 counties with the highest rates of foreclosures in Illinois. Comparatively, in 2017, Kendall County had a newly filed foreclosure rate of 1 in every 825 homes. Expectations are that the foreclosures will continue to level off or decrease in 2019 as compared to 2018. Below is a graph illustrating the trend of foreclosures in Yorkville for calendar years 2009 to 2018. Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memorandum. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #6 Tracking Number EDC 2019-13 204 Boombah Blvd. – Lot 3 Final Plat of Resubdivision of Yorkville Business Center Economic Development Committee - February 5, 2019 Majority Vote Proposed Final Plat of Resubdivision of Lot 3 in the Yorkville Business Center Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Proposed Request: The petitioner, Boombah Inc., is seeking final plat approval to resubdivide Lot 3 of the Yorkville Business Center, an approximately 21-acre parcel. Located in the southwest quadrant of IL Route 47 (N. Bridge Street) and Boombah Boulevard, this parcel was part of the original Inland Land/F.E. Wheaton Annexation Agreement approved by the City of Yorkville in 1995. Currently, the parcel is improved with two (2) buildings zoned B-3 General Business District utilized by Boombah Inc. for their custom athletic apparel business operations. Proposed Final Plat of Resubdivision: As proposed, the approximately 21-acre parcel will be resubdivided into four (4) separate lots as defined below: PARCEL DESCRIPTION LOT SIZE ACCESS AVAILABLE Lot 1 New Parcel/Unimproved 49,562 sq. ft (1.138 acres) Existing access from Boombah Blvd. Lot 2 New Parcel/Existing Building 570,264 sq. ft (13.091 acres) Existing access from Boombah Blvd. Requires supplemental access easement from Lot 1 to connect Boombah Blvd for accessory truck traffic. Lot 3 New Parcel/Existing Building 252,114 sq. ft. (5.788 acres) Existing access from Boombah Blvd and private side road. Lot 4 New Parcel/Unimproved 26,291 sq. ft (1.292 acres) Future access from extension of private side road. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: January 23, 2019 Subject: PZC 2019-01 204 Boombah Blvd – Lot 3 of Yorkville Business Center Final Plat of Resubdivision Approval The proposed Final Plat of Resubdivision has been reviewed by the City’s engineering consultant, Engineering Enterprises Inc., for compliance with the Subdivision Control Ordinance’s Standards for Specification. Comments dated January 2, 2019 were provided (see attached) and have been responded to by the petitioner’s engineer, HR Green in a resubmitted Final Plat of resubdivision dated 01/21/19. The subsequent EEI engineering review, provided in a letter dated 1-24-19, has found the submitted plans in general conformance with the City’s requirements and standard engineering practices with minor comments to be addressed by the petitioner prior to final plat recordation. Staff Comments: Based upon the review of the proposed Final Plat of Resubdivision of Lot 3 in the Yorkville Business Center, staff believes the submitted plans are consistent with the approved development site plan and the current subdivision control regulations. Therefore, we intend to recommend approval of the Final Plat to the Planning and Zoning Commission at the February 13, 2019 meeting with subsequent final determination by the City Council at the February 26, 2019 meeting. Should you have any questions regarding this matter; staff will be available at Tuesday night’s meeting. Attachments: 1. Copy of Petitioner’s Application 2. Final Plat of Resubdivision of Lot in the Yorkville Business Center prepared by HR Green date last revised 01/21/19. 3. Letter from HR Green dated 1-22-19 4. EEI Letter to the City dated January 24, 2019 re: Boombah, Lot 3 – Final Plat. 5. Plan Council packet materials from January 10, 2019 United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-3436 AppliCAtion For lot replAtting (re-SUbdividing) Purpose of Application The purpose of the Subdivision Control Ordinance is to regulate the orderly division of land into two (2) or more lots or parcels by protecting the interests of the landowner, the city and the general public. The process for applying for lot re-platting or “re-subdividing” land allows for the review of a proposed layout of the divided lots and establishes standard design specification to ensure adequate roadways for safe and efficient traffic circulation is provided; safeguard against flood damage; promotes access and availability of utilities; and requires the provision of other necessary public improvements. However, there are some instances where an application for replatting is not required as the type of resubdivision is deemed exempt. Refer to Section 11-1-4 of the Subdivision Control Ordinance for those circumstances. This packet explains the process to successfully submit and complete an Application for Resubdividing a Lot. It includes a detailed description of the process and the actual application itself (Pages 7 and 10). Please type the required information in the application on your computer. The application will need to be printed and signed by the applicant. The only item that needs to be submitted from this packet is the application. The rest of the packet is to help guide you through the process unto completion. For a complete explanation of what is legally required throughout the Replatting process, please refer to “Title 11 Subdivision Control” of the Yorkville, Illinois City Code. 1 Procedure Flow Chart Step 2 Plan Council Presentation Review (Meets 2nd and 4th Thursday of the month) Step 3 Plan Commission Review (Meets 2nd Wednesday of the month) Step 4 Economic Development Committee Review (Meets 1st Tuesday of the month) Step 5 City Council Review (Meets 2nd and 4th Tuesday of the month) Step 6 Final Plat Recording (City’s Clerk Office) 2 Application Procedure Step 1 Submit Application, Fees, and All Pertinent Information to the Community Development Department Application Procedure Step 1 Application Submittal The following must be submitted to the Community Development Department: 2 orignal signed applications with legal description. 5 copies each of the application, proposed drawings, location map, site plan. Appropriate filing fee. (See attached Fee Sheet on page 6) 1 CD containing an electronic copy (pdf) of each of the signed application (complete with ex- hibits), proposed drawings, location map, and site plan. Subdivision Plats: 15 copies depicting the originally platted lots, the proposed new lots, the proposed modifications and adjustments. 5 of the copies must be full size while the remaining 10 must be 11” by 17”. Within one (1) week of submittal, the Community Development Department will determine if the aplication is complete or if additional information is needed. These materials must be submitted a minimum of 45 days prior to the targeted Plan Commission meeting. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of the project. Applicant is responsible for making submittals to other review agencies such as Kendall County, Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, etc., to allow timely review by the City. Applicant will be responsible for payment of recording fees and public hearing costs, including written transcripts of the public hearing and outside consultant costs (i.e. legal review, land planner, zoning coordinator, environmental, etc.). The applicant will be required to establish a deposit account with the city to cover these fees. The Petitioner Deposit Account/Acknowledgement of Financial Responsibility form is attached to this document and must be submitted with the application. • • • • • 3 Step 2 plan Council Applicant must present the proposed subdivision re-plat to the Plan Council. The Plan Council meets on the 2nd and 4th Thursday of the month. The members of the Council include the Community Development Director, City Engineer, the Building Department Official, the Public Works Director, the Director of Parks and Recreation, a Fire Department Representative, and a Police Department Representative. Upon recommendation by the Plan Council, applicant will move forward to the Plan Commission hearing. Application Procedure Step 3 Step 4 economic development Committee Applicant must present the proposed plan to the Economic Development Committee. Economic Development Committee meets at 7:00 p.m. on the 1st Tuesday of each month. This session is to discuss and consider recommendations prior to full City Council considerations and provide informal feedback. The Economic Development Committee will submit its recommendation to Cit Council. Step 5 City Council Applicant must present the proposed subdivision replat to the City Council. The City Council meets the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays of every month at 7:00 p.m. in the Yorkville City Hall Council Chambers. The proposal will be discussed at the City Council hearing where formal voting takes place. City Council will make the final approval of the replatting. 4 plan Commission Applicant will attend a public hearing conducted by the Plan Commission. The Plan Commission meets on the 2nd Wednesday of the Month at 7:00pm. Notice will be placed in the Kendall County Record by the United City of Yorkville. The applicant is responsible for sending certified public hearing notices to adjacent property owners within 500 feet of the subject property no less than 15 days and no more than 30 days prior to the public hearing date. Twenty Four (24) hours prior to the public hearing, a certified affidavit must be filed by the applicant with the Community Development Department containing the names, addresses and permanent parcel numbers of all parties that were notified. The Plan Commission will conduct a public hearing on the request, take public comments, discuss the request, and make a recommendation to City Council. Step 6 Final plat recording Once the final subdivision plat is approved by the City Council and all required documents, bonds, and letters of credit are submitted to the city, the final plat must be recorded with Kendall County. Submit the final plat mylar to the Deputy Clerk for signatures. When all city signatures are in place, the developer or his surveyor may take the mylar to the Kendall County Clerk for their signature. The next step is to have six (6) paper prints made and return to the Kendall County Recorder’s office for recording. Kendall County requires the mylar and 4 paper copies. The City of Yorkville requires that you submit 2 recorded paper copies to the Deputy Clerk. Application Procedure 5 Dormant Applications The Community Development Director shall determine if an application meets or fails to meet the requirements stated above. If the Director determines that the application is incomplete it will become dormant under these circumstances: The applicant has been notified of such deficiencies and has not responded or provided a time line for completing the application within ninety (90) days from the time of notification. The applicant has not responded in writing to a request for information or documentation from the initial plan commission review within six (6) months from the date of that request. The applicant has not responded to a request for legal or engineering deposit replenishment for city incurred costs and fees within ninety (90) days from the date of the request. If the Community Development Director has sent the required notice and the applicant has not withdrawn their application or brought it into compliance, then the director shall terminate the application. After termination, the application shall not be reconsidered except after the filing of a completely new application. Withdrawal or termination of an application shall not affect the applicant’s responsibility for payment of any costs and fees, or any other outstanding debt owed to the city. The balance of any funds deposited with the city that is not needed to pay for costs and fees shall be returned to the applicant. (Ord. 2011-34, 7-26-2011) • • • INVOICE & WORKSHEET PETITION APPLICATION CONTACT: DEVELOPMENT/ PROPERTY: ____________________________________ ________________________________________ _____________________________________ Acreage: ______________ _____________________________________ Date: _____________ Concept Plan Review: [ ] Yes [ ] No $____________ Engineering Plan Review Deposit of $500 due Amendment: [ ] Yes [ ] No $____________ $500.00 Fee due for each: (Annexation) (Plan) (Plat) (PUD) Annexation: [ ] Yes [ ] No $____________ $250.00, plus $10/acre for each acre over 5. # of acres: ________ - 5 = ________ x $10 = ________ + $250 Rezoning: [ ] Yes [ ] No $____________ $200.00, plus $10/acre for each acre over 5. # of acres: ________ - 5 = ________ x $10 = ________ + $200 If annexing and rezoning, charge only 1 per acre fee. If rezoning to a PUD, charge PUD Development Fee- not Rezoning Fee. Special Use: [ ] Yes [ ] No $____________ $250.00, plus $10/acre for each acre over 5. # of acres: ________ - 5 = ________ x $10 = ________ + $250 Mile and ½ Review: $250.00 [ ] Yes [ ] No $____________ Zoning Variance: $85.00 [ ] Yes [ ] No $____________ Outside Consultants deposit of $500.00 due Preliminary Plan Fee: $500.00 [ ] Yes [ ] No $____________ P.U.D. Fee: $500.00 [ ] Yes [ ] No $____________ Final Plat Fee: $500.00 [ ] Yes [ ] No $____________ Engineering Plan Review Deposit: [ ] Yes [ ] No $____________ [ ] Less than 1 acre = $1,000 due [ ] Over 1 acre and less than 10 acres = $2,500 due [ ] Over 10 acres and less than 40 acres = $5,000 due [ ] Over 40 acres and less than 100 acres = $10,000 due [ ] Over 100 acres = $20,000 due Outside Consultants Deposit: [ ] Yes [ ] No $____________ Legal, Land Planner, Zoning Coordinator, Environmental Services Annexation, subdivision and Special Use: [ ] Less than 2 acres = $1,000 due [ ] Over 2 acres and less than 10 acres = $2,500 due [ ] Over 10 acres = $5,000 due TOTAL AMOUNT DUE: $____________ Word/ O Drive/ Dev. Dep. ARO/ Fee Sheet Wkst United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Property Street Address Property Existing Zoning Property Total Acreage Number of Lots to be Created proposed lot Areas and dimensions Application For Lot Replatting (Re-Subdividing) 7 Property Information Lot Number Lot Dimensions (W x L, in ft.)Lot Area (sq. ft.) Name of Applicant(s) Business Address City State ZIP Business Phone Business Fax Business Cell Business E-mail Applicant Information StAFF USe onlY Date of Submission PC# Development Name Attorney Name Address City State ZIP Phone Fax E-mail engineer Name Address City State ZIP Phone Fax E-mail land planner/Surveyor Name Address City State ZIP Phone Fax E-mail Application For Lot Replatting (Re-Subdividing) 8 Additional Contact Information AgreementAttachments Applicant must attach a legal description of the property to this application and title it as “Exhibit A”. 651 Prairie Pointe Drive | Suite 201 | Yorkville, IL 60560 Main 630.553.7560 + Fax 630.553.7646 HRGREEN.COM January 22, 2019 Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Boombah, Lot 3 – Final Plat (204 Boombah Blvd) United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois HR Green Job No.: 180274 Dear Ms. Barksdale-Noble, HR Green, Inc. has received the comment letter from Engineering Enterprises, Inc., dated January 2, 2019. Below is a point-by-point response to that letter. Comment 1: The Plat shows PU&DE easements being added on the west side of the property for the existing storm sewer and sanitary sewer service for the existing building. These are privately owned and maintained utilities and do not require public utility easements. Response 1: That is correct about the private utilities and services and will remain as private, as a result of the discussions at the plan council meeting with the public works director, those public easements shall remain on the plat for the purpose of access by the City as required in the future Lot splits. Comment 2: Additional information is required for the proposed Lot 1. There are PU&DE easements shown with Lot 1 but without information on the purpose of the easements we can’t complete our review. Response 2: Noted, an aerial overlay has been submitted to provide additional information on the existing private utilities and private services. A utility easement would still be required to benefit Lot 2 access across the future Lot 1 and based on discussions above the PU&DE remains at this time. Existing 20’ PU&DE on west side was previously platted. Comment 3: Remove the provisions titled Easement Provisions Response 3: Revised as requested. Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble HR Green Job No.: 180274 January 22, 2019 Page 2 Comment 4: Change the provisions title Easement for Public Utilities and Drainage Provisions to Public Utilities and Drainage Easement Provisions. Response 4: Revised as requested. Additional Plan Council Comments based on agenda paperwork (PC 2019-01): Response 1: Noted about surrounding zoning and current property zoned B-3 General Business District. Response 2: Revised aerial overlay has been included in submittal. Response 3: Front Yard Building Setback Line (BSL) of 50’ has been added to Lot 1 and Lot 4 as requested based on current zoning requirements. Additional setbacks are defined by zoning at the time of building permit and review and are subject to change over time and therefore should not bound by a final plat. Response 4: Noted, regarding the maximum building height for B-3 is 80 feet and to apply at building permit at a later date. No plans have been discussed or prepared at this time. Response 5: Noted, regarding the maximum lot coverage for B-3 is 80% and to apply at the time of building permit. No plans have been discussed or prepared at this time. Response 6: Noted, refer to engineer’s comments above. Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble HR Green Job No.: 180274 January 22, 2019 Page 3 If you have any further questions or require any additional information, please contact me at 630.708.5002. Sincerely, HR GREEN DEVELOPMENT, LLC David W. Schultz, PE, LEED AP Project Manager DWS/sab Cc: Mike Mann (via e-mail) EEI (via e-mail) \\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2018\180274\Corr\ltr-012219-Comment Response-Barksdale-Noble.docx L O T 2 Y O R K V I L L E B U S I N E S S C E N T E R Illinois Professional Design Firm # 184-001322 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 201, Yorkville, Illinois 60560 t. 630.553.7560 f. 630.553.7646 www.hrgreen.com1 OF 2PIN: 02-17-400-012BOOMBAHBOULEVARDCOMMERCIAL DRIVECOMMONWEALTH EDISON R.O.W.LOT 4YORKVILLE BUSINESS CENTER LOT 3YORKVILLE BUSINESS CENTERDOCUMENT 200000013808CERTIFICATES OF CORRECTION:200000014055, 200000014761 & 200000015028LOT 149,562± SQ.FT.1.138± ACRESLOT 2570,246± SQ.FT.13.091± ACRESLOT 3252,114± SQ.FT.5.788± ACRESLOT 426,291± SQ.FT.1.292± ACRES PIN: 02-17-400-012Illinois Professional Design Firm # 184-001322 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 201, Yorkville, Illinois 60560 t. 630.553.7560 f. 630.553.7646 www.hrgreen.com2 OF 2 L O T 2 Y O R K V I L L E B U S I N E S S C E N T E R Illinois Professional Design Firm # 184-001322 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 201, Yorkville, Illinois 60560 t. 630.553.7560 f. 630.553.7646 www.hrgreen.com1 OF 2PIN: 02-17-400-012BOOMBAHBOULEVARDCOMMERCIAL DRIVECOMMONWEALTH EDISON R.O.W.LOT 4YORKVILLE BUSINESS CENTER LOT 3YORKVILLE BUSINESS CENTERDOCUMENT 200000013808CERTIFICATES OF CORRECTION:200000014055, 200000014761 & 200000015028LOT 149,562± SQ.FT.1.138± ACRESLOT 2570,246± SQ.FT.13.091± ACRESLOT 3252,114± SQ.FT.5.788± ACRESLOT 426,291± SQ.FT.1.292± ACRES PIN: 02-17-400-012Illinois Professional Design Firm # 184-001322 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 201, Yorkville, Illinois 60560 t. 630.553.7560 f. 630.553.7646 www.hrgreen.com2 OF 2 I have reviewed the application for Final Plat approval received November 14, 2018 as submitted by HR Green on behalf of Boombah, Inc., Petitioner, as well as a Final Plat of Resubdivision prepared by HR Green, Inc. dated last revised 08/16/18. The petitioner is seeking Final Plat approval for an approximately 21-acre site located in the southwest quadrant of IL Rte 47 (N. Bridge St.) and Boombah Blvd. Based upon my review of the application documents and plans; I have compiled the following comments: GENERAL ZONING/PLANNING COMMENTS: 1. ZONING - The subject property is currently zoned B-3 General Business District. The following are the current immediate surrounding zoning and land uses: Zoning Land Use North OS-1 Open Space (Passive) B-3 General Business District (Yorkville Business Center) Wheaton Woods Park Commercial South Public Utilities ComEd right-of-way BNSF Railroad East B-3 General Business District (Yorkville Business Center) Undeveloped West M-1 Limited Manufacturing District Undeveloped 2. AERIAL OVERLAY – Staff is requesting an aerial overlay of the proposed resubdivision of land, as there are two (2) existing buildings on Lots 2 and 3 which also have parking lots. Please provide a calculation of the parking that will be provided on each parcel after the proposed resubdivision as well building setback dimensions for each resubdivided lot. 3. BUILDING SETBACKS – the following building setbacks are for parcels zoned B-3 General Business District: BUILDING SETBACK REQUIRED MINIMUM PROPOSED SETBACK Side/Corner Yard Setback 20’/30’ 25’ (East/West) Front Yard 50’ 25’ (North) Rear Yard/Transitional Yard 20’/30’ Unknown (South) Memorandum To: Plan Council From: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Date: December 5, 2018 Subject: PC 2019-01 204 Boombah Blvd – Lot 3 (Final Plat) Proposed Resubdivision of Approximately 21-acres According to the proposed Final Plat, there is a building setback of 25 feet which references recorded document 200000013808 & 9507157. However, per Ordinance No. 1995-5 which annexed the original development, any approved bulk regulations for this development were locked into place until the term of the document. The annexation agreement (Ord. No, 1995-5) expired March 23, 2015. Therefore, the proposed new lots will have to meet the current building setback standard. 4. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT - Maximum building height for the B-3 District is 80 feet. 5. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE – Per Section 10-7-1 of the Yorkville Zoning Code, the maximum lot coverage for the B-3 General Business District (inclusive of sidewalks, parking areas and all impervious surfaces) is 80%. 6. FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT – Refer to engineer’s comments. Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memorandum. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #7 Tracking Number EDC 2019-14 Hively Landscaping – Windmill Farms Annexation (Rezoning) Economic Development Committee - February 5, 2019 Majority Vote Proposed Nursery & Garden Center Development on the former Windmill Farms Development. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department PROPOSED REQUEST: The petitioner, Matthew Hively, is seeking rezoning approval of three (3) parcels within the Windmill Farms Annexation and Planned Unit Development agreement, which approved certain land uses consistent with those found in the R-4 General Multi-Family Residence District and B-3 General Business zoning districts. The requested new zoning would be B-3 General Business District on two (2) parcels and A-1 Agricultural District on one (1) parcel. The purpose of the rezoning is to establish and operate a nursery and garden center with retail store on the proposed B-3 zoned parcels, and an accessory building for the storage of equipment and landscape materials in the proposed A-1 zoned parcel. The total proposed area to be rezoned consists of approximately 16.21-acres of vacant land near IL Route 71 and IL Route 126. PROPERTY BACKGROUND: The subject property was zoned within the Planned Unit Development (PUD) District with B-3 General Business District and R-4 General Multi-Family Residence District land uses, as part of the Windmill Farm’s annexation approved in 2008 per Ordinance 2008-40. Per Exhibit “E” of Ord. 2008-40, Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: January 23, 2019 Subject: PZC 2019-03 Hively Landscaping – Windmill Farms Annexation Proposed Nursery & Garden Center Development (Rezoning) ---Windmill Farms Boundaries the approximately 91-acre site, of which the subject parcels are included, was to be developed with a mix of residential and commercial land uses. The annexation and concept site plan were the only approvals granted for the Windmill Farm development. The property has remained vacant and unplatted since the original approvals in 2008. Per the City Attorney, since the concept plan was never subsequently formalized by a Planned Unit Development (PUD) final plat, and with the passage of time, the concept plan for the Windmill Farm development is no longer valid. Separate ordinances clarifying the invalidity of the PUD zoning classification and an annexation agreement amendment removing the provisions of the PUD will be prepared by the City Attorney for City Council approval, in conjunction with this request, to allow for this property, and any future parcels within the Windmill Farms development, to seek rezoning to a more suitable land use designation. Those ordinances will be presented to the EDC in March. SITE ANALYSIS: The following are the current immediate surrounding zoning and land uses for the entire area surrounding the approximately 91-acre Windmill Farms PUD: Zoning Land Use North A-1 Agriculture Unincorporated Kendall County (Farm Land)/IL Rte. 71 South A-1 Agriculture/R-2 & R-2D Detached & Attached Residential Unincorporated Kendall County (Landscape Business)/Raintree Village (Residential) East A-1 Agriculture Unincorporated Kendall County (Farm Land) West B-3 Business/R-2 Detached Residential Country Hills (Commercial & Residential) Zoning • The proposed requested uses are defined in the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance as a “nursery/greenhouse” and “agricultural”. • The nursery/greenhouse use is a permitted use in the B-3 General Business District, which is by definition, a “retail business whose principal activity is the selling of plants and having outdoor storage, growing and/or display of plants.” • The agricultural use is a permitted use in the A-1 Agricultural District, which is defined as “the employment of land for the primary purpose of raising, harvesting, and selling crops, or….by any other horticultural, floricultural or viticulture use…” Comprehensive Plan (Future Land Use) The subject property’s future land use is classified as “Estate/Conservation Residential (ERC)” which is intended to provide flexibility for residential design in areas that can accommodate low-density detached single-family housing but also include sensitive environmental and scenic features that should be retained and enhanced. Due to this future land use classification, if the rezoning requests are approved, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use map will be necessary. The proposed B-3 zoned parcel would correlate with a future land use designation of “Destination Commercial (DC)” and “Agricultural Zone (AZ)” for the A-1 zoned parcel. Proposed Concept/Site Plan As proposed, only Parcel 2 (#05-03-300-039) will be redeveloped for the nursey/greenhouse and retail business. The site plan illustrates a 4,000 square foot retail building with outdoor scale and customer parking. Parking required for nursery use (B-3) is 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet, requiring a minimum of 12 parking spaces, and the petitioner proposes to utilize a permeable paver surface for the parking lot coverage. Accessory outdoor storage will be maintained in plant material bins, temporary plant houses and pallets. Finally, an onsite detention basin is also proposed within the northeast area of the parcel. All buildings will be subject to the City's Appearance Code which requires new commercial land uses to utilize masonry products or precast concrete shall be incorporated on at least fifty percent (50%) of the total building, as broken down as follows: The front facade shall itself incorporate masonry products or precast concrete on at least fifty percent (50%) of the facade. Any other facade that abuts a street shall incorporate masonry products. The use of masonry products or precast concrete is encouraged on the remaining facades. Currently, there are no redevelopment plans for other proposed B-3 zoned property, Parcel 1 (05- 03-200-022), and the proposed A-1 zoned property, Parcel #3 (05-03-300-035) will be utilized primarily for stocking and storing plant material. The following chart illustrates the minimum required yard setbacks for buildings/structures within the B-3 General Business District: Minimum Requirement Proposed Setback Front (IL Rte. 126) 50 feet +/- 220’ (Retail Building) Rear 20 feet +/- 20’ (Temp. Plant Houses) Corner Side (North/IL Rte. 71) 30 feet +/- 50’ (Temp. Plant Houses) Corner Side (Southwest/IL Rte. 126) 30 feet +/- 45’ (Material Bins) Additionally, parking lots within the B-3 zoning district located adjacent to a major arterial roadway must maintain a minimum of 20 feet setback from the property line which is provided on the proposed site plan. Utilities There are no nearby public utilities (water, sewer) in this area. The petitioner will utilize an existing well and septic field for the on-site needs of the development. Access/Transportation Proposed access to the commercial site (nursey/greenhouse) will be in two (2) locations, one to the north off IL Route 71 and another southwest off IL Route 126. IDOT's approval will be required for all proposed access points and any work within IDOT's right-of-way (i.e. berm along IL 71). Landscape Ordinance It is anticipated that the property will need to be cleared in preparation for the installation of the nursery site. Per Section 8-12-2-H of the Landscape Ordinance, a Tree Preservation Plan is required for all lots five (5) acres or greater in area. No live trees with a four-inch (4”) DBH (diameter breast height) may be removed without first submitting an application for tree removal and receiving approval from the City as part of the building permit process. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REZONING: Section 10-4-10-B of the City’s Zoning Ordinance establishes criteria for findings of fact related to rezoning (map amendment) requests. No rezoning shall be recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission without each of the following considered: 1. The existing uses and zoning of nearby property. 2. The extent to which the property values are diminished by the particular zoning restrictions. 3. The extent to which the destruction of the property values of plaintiff promotes the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the public. 4. The relative gain to the public as compared to the hardship imposed upon the individual property owner. 5. The suitability of the subject property for the zoned purpose. 6. The length of time the property has been vacant as zoned considered in the context of land development in the area in the vicinity of the subject property. 7. The community need for the proposed use. 8. The care to which the community has undertaken to plan its land use development. The petitioner has provided written responses to these findings as part of their application (see attached) and requests inclusion of those responses into the public record at the March 13, 2019 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff is generally supportive of the proposed rezoning; even though, if approved, would require an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Update. Our recommendation is in consideration of the length of time the area has remained undeveloped under the current concept plan and zoning. This is in addition to the existing annexation agreement not correctly approving a special use authorizing a PUD for the Windmill Farm development. A separate request to clarify that oversight and clear the path for the other parcels within Windmill Farms to redevelop is concurrently being pursued by staff. As stated earlier, this rezoning request is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission on March 13, 2019. Staff and the petitioner will be available at Tuesday night’s meeting to answer any questions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Hively Landscaping Geometric Plan dated 01/09/19, prepared by Spaceco, Inc. 2. A-1 Rezoning Application 3. B-3 Rezoning Application 4. Ordinance 2008-40 - Windmill Farms Annexation and PUD Agreement 5. 01-10-19 Plan Council Packet 3"PVC VERTICAL CABLE MARKER FIBER OPTIC MARKER AT&T CABLE 6'NW-SE UP W/MAST 6'NW-SE UP W/MAST CONTROL BOX TRAFFIC SIGNAL "ROUTE 126 EAST" CULVERT 15"CMP "I-55 15" "PLAINFIELD 12" USE CONTROL SIGN INTERSECTION LANE SIGNAL" "TRAFFIC CULVERT 18"CMP "IL 71 JUNCTION" "IL 71 - IL 126" SIGNAL" "TRAFFIC 7 WIRES 7 WIRES SIGNAL" "TRAFFIC SIGNAL" "TRAFFIC "IL 126 - IL71" CULVERT 2'X3' BOX "OSWEGO..." "OTTAWA..." SIGNAL" "TRAFFIC CULVERT" "15"CMP RIGHT" CURVES "ROAD "8780RT126" CULVERT 15"CMP 1 WIRE 1 WIRE 1 WIREGUY WIRE AHEAD" "STOPLIGHT 2 W I RESUP W/TRANS CULVERT 2'X5' BOX CULVERT 15"CMP LIMIT 50" "SPEED "8720RT126" GUY WIRE 4 WI RES FRAME SHED 1 STORY TANK PROPANE AC UNIT DECK WOOD POLE CLOTHESLINE 4' WOOD FENCE AS OF 11/10/2016 EDGE OF WATER "STOP" 4' WOOD FENCE4' WI RE F ENCECULVERT CRUSHED CMP OF DITCH CENTERLINE DEBRIS PILE 8'NW-SE UP W/MAST 6 WIRES 6'NW-SE UP W/MAST 6 WIRES 6 WIRES 6 WIRES 4 WI RE S 4 WI RES 4 WI RES 4 WI RES 4 WI RES 4 WI RES 4 WI RES 4' WIRE FENCE 8"DIP UNKNOWN ORIGINS OF DITCH CENTERLINE FRAME SHED 1 STORY HEIGHT=23.8' BUILDING HEIGHT=17.9' BUILDING GUY WIRE 6 WIRES 6 WIRES 6 WIRES 6'NE-SW 6'NW-SE & UP W/MAST SIGN STREET 8'NW-SE UP W/MAST 8'NW-SE UP W/MAST 8'NW-SE UP W/MAST 8'NW-SE UP W/MAST OF DITCH CENTERLINE "ROUTE 71" LIMIT 45" "SPEED "NAPERVILLE..." "OSWEGO..." SIGN 4' WI RE FENCEDECK WOOD LIMIT 35" "SPEED 74.92' 75.49'90.31'89.85' RESIDENCE FRAME SPLIT LEVEL 44.28'44.28'26.27'26.34'10.05'10.05'10.02'10.02' METER ELECTRIC T T Phone: (815) 941-0260 Fax: (815) 941-0263Morris, Illinois 60450 N. Liberty Street,21224OF REMARKSDATENO.JOB NO. FILENAME: DATE: SHEET NO.DATEREMARKSN 0 50 SCALE 1" = 50' 100 DETENTION BASIN 1 WI NG ROADIL ROUTE 71 IL ROUTE 126 LEGEND P ALLETS & MATERI AL STORAGEMATERI AL BI NS M A T E R IA L B IN SPLANT MATERIAL STORAGE PLANT MATERIAL STORAGE @ GRADE PROPOSED SCALE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS9252.04 01/09/19 9252.04EXH-GEOMETRICHIVELY LANDSCAPING1 1 EXH-AEXHIBIT A - GEOMETRIC PLAN2 5' 50'25' 50' 50' 4 5' 4 5' 7 0' 50' 8 0' BUILDING PROPOSED 4,000 SF 9' 18' 10' 5 0'50'2 5' 9'18'P ARKI NGP ARKI NG2 0' 20' 20' 2 0' 10' 10'20'35' 35' 40'R40'R40'R40' R TEMP ORARY P LANT HOUS ES11' STANDARD B-6.12 CURB & GUTTER GRAVEL PAVERS CONCRETE PAVEMENT OR APRON HMA PAVEMENT N:\Projects\9252-M\9252.04 - Hively\EXHIBITS\9252.04EXH-GEOMETRIC PLAN.dgn Default User=fdeltoro PARCEL 3 That part of the Northeast quarter of Section 3, Township 36 North, range 7 East of the third principal meridian described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Northeast quarter; thence North 01 degrees 34 minutes 52 seconds West along the West line of said Northeast quarter 245.12 feet; thence South 84 degrees 27 minutes 30 seconds East 198.51 feet; thence North 00 degrees 42 minutes 30 seconds West 423.02 feet to the center line of Illinois State Route No. 71; thence North 60 degrees 02 minutes 30 seconds East along said center line 472.59 feet to a line drawn North 00 degrees 10 minutes 48 seconds East parallel with the West line of said Northeast ¼, from a point on the South line of said Northeast ¼ which is 598.62 feet Easterly of the Southwest corner of said Northeast ¼; thence South 00 degrees 10 minutes 48 seconds West along said parallel line 880.56 feet to said South line; thence South 89 degrees 34 minutes 48 seconds West along said South line 598.62 feet to the point of beginning, being a portion of a larger parcel of land described as parcel 3 in Quit Claim Deed recorded on April 24, 2017 as Document 2001700006075, in Kendall County, Illinois. PARCEL 8 That part of the Southwest quarter of Section 3, Township 36 North, Range 7 East of the third principal meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Southwest quarter; thence North 00 degrees 08 minutes 14 seconds West along the West line of said Southwest quarter, 1,995.75 feet to the center line of Illinois State Route No. 71; thence North 71 degrees 23 minutes 59 seconds East along said center line 30.45 feet to the point of intersection of said center line with center line of Illinois State Route No. 126 for the point of beginning; thence North 71 degrees 23 minutes 59 seconds East along said Route 71 center line 230.67 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left having a radius of 11,459.20 feet which is tangent to the last described course at the last described point at the last description point, 1,141.60 feet to the intersection with the center line extended Northwesterly of Wing Road; thence South 21 degrees 30 minutes 13 seconds East along said Wing Road center line 761.0 feet; thence South 58 degrees 16 minutes 47 seconds West 265.38 feet to said Route 126 center line; thence Northwesterly along said Route 126 center line being along a curve to the left and having a radius of 2292.01 feet which is tangent to a line drawn North 72 degrees 57 minutes 06 seconds West from the last described point 147.83 feet; thence North 76 degrees 38 minutes 49 seconds West along said Route 126 center line 850.98 feet thence Northwesterly along said Route 126 center line being along a curve to the right and having a radius of 2,148.79 feet which is tangent to the last described course at the last described point, 383.53 feet to the point of beginning, Excepting therefrom that part described as follows: that part of the Southwest quarter of Section 3, Township 36 North, Range 7 East of the third principal meridian described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Southwest quarter; thence North 00 degrees 08 minutes 14 seconds West along the West line of said Southwest quarter 1,995.75 feet to the center line of Illinois State Route 71; thence North 71 degrees 23 minutes 59 seconds East along said Route 71 center line 261.12 feet to a point of curvature; thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left having a radius of 11,459.20 feet which is tangent to the last described course 1,141.60 feet to the intersection with the center line extended Northwesterly of Wing Road for the point of beginning; thence South 21 degrees 30 minutes 13 seconds East along said Wing Road center line 258.05 feet; thence South 68 degrees 29 minutes 47 seconds West 200.0 feet; thence North 21 degrees 30 minutes 13 seconds West parallel with said Wing Road center line 250.0 feet to said Route 71 center line; thence Northeasterly along said Route 71 center line 200.16 feet to the point of beginning, in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. And also excepting, that part of the Southwest quarter of Section 3 in Township 36 North, Range 7 East of the third principal meridian, Kendall County, Illinois, described as follows with bearings referenced to the Illinois State Plane Coordinate System East Zone (NAD83); commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southwest quarter of said Section 3; thence North 01 degree 35 minutes 30 seconds West, 1995.04 feet along the West line of said Southwest quarter to the centerline of a public highway designated Il 71; thence North 69 degrees 55 minutes 19 seconds East, 31.52 feet along said centerline to the point of beginning, from the point of beginning; thence North 69 degrees 55 minutes 19 seconds East, 230.66 feet along said centerline; thence Northeasterly, 940.58 feet along an 11,479.02 foot radius curve to the left having a chord bearing North 67 degrees 34 minutes 29 seconds East, 940.31 feet; thence South 22 degrees 56 minutes 31 seconds East, 60.03 feet; thence Southwesterly, 418.10 feet on an 11,539.02 foot radius curve to the right having a chord bearing South 66 degrees 16 minutes 29 seconds West, 418.08 feet; thence South 59 degrees 24 minutes 09 seconds West, 71.10 feet; thence South 25 degrees 14 minutes 24 seconds West, 60.52 feet; thence Southeasterly, 570.87 feet on an 875.00 foot radius curve to the left having a chord bearing South 55 degrees 22 minutes 46 seconds East, 560.80 feet; thence South 74 degrees 04 minutes 13 seconds East, 274.41 feet; thence South 64 degrees 05 minutes 29 seconds East, 35.85 feet; thence South 56 degrees 49 minutes 00 seconds West 64.56 feet to the center line of a public highway designated IL 126; thence Northwesterly, 162.08 feet on said centerline being a 2,291.64 foot radius curve to the left having a chord bearing North 76 degrees 16 minutes 12 seconds West, 162.05 feet thence North 78 degrees 17 minutes 46 seconds West, 357.37 feet on said centerline; thence North 53 degrees 52 minutes 46 seconds West, 96.76 feet to the existing Northerly right of way line of IL 126, thence Northwesterly, 297.03 feet on a 990.00 foot radius curve to the right having a chord bearing North 45 degrees 17 minutes 03 seconds West, 295.92 feet; thence North 36 degrees 39 minutes 21 seconds West, 23.77 feet; thence North 77 degrees 19 minutes 38 seconds West, 84.74 feet; thence South 69 degrees 03 minutes 36 seconds West, 100.61 feet; thence South 69 degrees 55 minutes 52 seconds West, 149.98 feet to the Southerly right of way line of said IL 71; thence South 65 degrees 32 minutes 40 seconds West, 113.94 feet to the centerline of said IL 126; thence Northwesterly, 119.55 feet on said centerline being a 2170.59 foot radius curve to the right having a chord bearing North 69 degrees 20 minutes 17 seconds West, 119.54 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel 8A (included in parcel 8 but separated out for title vesting purposes only): That part of the Southwest quarter of Section 3 in Township 36 North, Range 7 East of the third principal meridian, Kendall County, Illinois, described as follows with bearings referenced to the Illinois State Plane Coordinate System East Zone (NAD83): Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southwest quarter of said section 3; thence North 01 degree 35 minutes 30 seconds West, 1995.04 feet along the West line of said Southwest quarter to the centerline of a public highway designated IL 71; thence North 69 degrees 55 minutes 19 seconds East , 31.52 feet along said centerline to the centerline of pavement SBI Route 66 (IL 126); thence South 69 degrees 20 minutes 17 seconds East, 119.54 feet along said centerline of pavement to the point of beginning; thence North 65 degrees 32 minutes 40 seconds East, 113.94 feet to the Southeasterly right of way line of FA Route 97 (IL 71); thence Southerly 44.66 feet on said right of way line being a 20.00 foot radius curve to the left whose chord bears South 03 degrees 27 minutes 31 seconds East, 35.94 feet to the Northeasterly existing right of way line of SBI Route 66 (IL 126); thence South 74 degrees 54 minutes 15 seconds East, 177.74 feet on said right of way line; thence South 78 degrees 17 minutes 46 seconds East, 376.03 feet on said right of way line; thence South 53 degrees 52 minutes 46 seconds East, 96.76 feet to the Centerline of SBI Route 66 (IL 126); thence North 78 degrees 17 minutes 46 seconds West, 464.15 feet along said centerline; thence Northwesterly 279.59 feet along the center pavement of SBI Route 66 (IL 126), being a 2,170.59 foot radius curve to the right whose chord bears North 74 degrees 36 minutes 21 seconds West, 279.40 feet to the point of beginning situated in Kendall County, Illinois. I have reviewed the applications for Rezoning request provided December 11, 2018 as submitted by Matthew C. Hively, petitioner, as well as the concept site plans. The petitioner is seeking rezoning approval from the expired concept plan for a Planned Unit Development (PUD), which was never final platted, that had an underlying zoning of R-4 General Multi-Family Residence District and B-3 General Business Zoning to a zoning of B-3 General Business District and A-1 Agricultural District. The purpose of the rezoning is to establish and operate a nursery and garden center with retail store on the proposed B-3 zoned parcel and an accessory building for the storage of equipment and landscape materials in the proposed A-1 zoned parcel. The total proposed area to be rezoned consists of approximately 16.21-acres of vacant land near IL Route 71 and IL Route 126. Included within the applications are the following documents: 1) Application for Rezoning Parcel (05-03-200-022) to A-1 Agricultural District 2) Legal Description 3) Surrounding Property Owners 4) Plat of Survey prepared by Spaceco Inc., dated 10/30/17 with hand-drawn concept plan for nursery, retail shop, hoop house, gravel parking lot and landscaping. 5) Application for Rezoning Parcel (05-03-300-039 and 05-03-300-035) to B-3 General Business District 6) Legal Description 7) Surrounding Property Owners 8) ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey prepared by Spaceco Inc., date revised 12/01/16 with hand- drawn concept plan for hoop houses, material bin storage, plant material storage and landscaping. Based upon my review of the application documents and materials, I have compiled the following comments (requests to the petitioner are underlined): Land Use History • The subject property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) with an underlying zoning of B-3 General Business District and R-4 General Multi-Family Residence District, as part of the Windmill Farm PUD approved in 2008 per Ordinance 2008-40. • Per Exhibit “E” of Ord. 2008-40 granting Annexation and Planned Unit Development approval for the Windmill Farms development, the approximately 91-acre site, of which the subject property is included, was to be developed as with mixed residential and commercial land uses. • The annexation and concept PUD plan were the only approvals granted for the Windmill Farm development. The property has remained vacant and unplatted since the original approvals in 2008. Per the City Attorney, since the concept plan was never subsequently formalized by a final Memorandum To: Plan Council From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Date: January 2, 2019 Subject: PZC 2019-03 Hively Landscaping – former Windmill Farms PUD Proposed new Nursery/Greenhouse Retail Use (Rezoning) plat or plan, and with the passage of time, the concept plan for the Windmill Farm development is no longer valid. • A separate ordinance repealing the original Windmill Farm PUD (Ord. 2008-40) will be prepared with by the City Attorney for recordation along with the ordinances rezoning the subject parcels, if approved by the City Council. Zoning • The proposed uses are defined in the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance as a “nursery/greenhouse” and “agricultural”. • The nursery/greenhouse use is a permitted use in the B-3 General Business District, which is by definition, a “retail business whose principal activity is the selling of plants and having outdoor storage, growing and/or display of plants.” • The agricultural use is a permitted use in the A-1 Agricultural District, which is defined as “the employment of land for the primary purpose of raising, harvesting, and selling crops, or….by any other horticultural, floricultural or viticulture use…” The following are the current immediate surrounding zoning and land uses for the entire area surrounding the approximately 91-acre Windmill Farms PUD: Zoning Land Use North A-1 Agriculture Unincorporated Kendall County (Farm Land)/IL Rte 71 South A-1 Agriculture/R-2 & R-2D Detached & Attached Residential Unincorporated Kendall County (Landscape Business)/Raintree Village (Residential) East A-1 Agriculture Unincorporated Kendall County (Farm Land) West B-3 Business/R-2 Detached Residential Country Hills (Commercial & Residential) Comprehensive Plan (Future Land Use) • The subject property’s future land use is classified as “Estate/Conservation Residential (ERC)” which is intended to provide flexibility for residential design in areas that can accommodate low- density detached single-family housing but also include sensitive environmental and scenic features that should be retained and enhanced. • Due to this future land use classification, if the rezoning requests are approved, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use map will be necessary. The proposed B-3 zoned parcel would correlate with a future land use designation of “Destination Commercial (DC)” and “Agricultural Zone (AZ)” for the A-1 zoned parcel. Proposed Concept/Site Plan • All buildings will be subject to the City's Appearance Code (see attached). o For new commercial land uses, Masonry products or precast concrete shall be incorporated on at least fifty percent (50%) of the total building, as broken down as follows: The front facade shall itself incorporate masonry products or precast concrete on at least fifty percent (50%) of the facade. Any other facade that abuts a street shall incorporate masonry products. The use of masonry products or precast concrete is encouraged on the remaining facades. • Gravel parking lot will not be permitted. • Depending on total proposed impervious surface, onsite detention maybe required. Maximum impervious surface for the B-3 Zoning District (Nursery) is 80%. • Parking required for nursery use (B-3) is 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet. • More details will need to be provided regarding the material bin/plant storage containers, hoop houses and scale area. Photographic images, manufacturing cut sheets or elevation drawings of these operational areas will be required. • The following chart illustrates the minimum required yard setbacks for buildings/structures within the B-3 General Business District: Minimum Requirement Proposed Setback Front (IL Rte. 71) 50 feet Not Provided Rear 20 feet Not Provided Interior Side (East) 20 feet Not Provided Interior Side (West) 20 feet Not Provided • The following chart illustrates the minimum required yard setbacks for buildings/structures within the A-1 Agricultural District: Minimum Requirement Proposed Setback Front (IL Rte. 71) 100 feet Not Provided Rear N/A N/A Interior Side (East) 50 feet Not Provided Interior Side (West) 50 feet Not Provided • Staff recommends a hard-lined, non hand-drawn concept plans with setback dimensions, parking calculations and total impervious surface for submittal to the Economic Development Committee meeting. Revised concept plans will be required to be submitted to staff no later than January 22, 2019. Utilities • What is your planned water source? There are no nearby public utilities (water, sewer) in this area. Please provide narrative of proposed water source. Fencing • Maximum fence height is 6 feet, 8 feet if adjacent to residential. A dimensioned section detail will be required for any proposed fence. Access/Transportation • Any work within IDOT's right-of-way (i.e. berm along IL 71) will require an IDOT permit. • IDOT's approval will be required for all proposed access points off of IL 71 and IL 126. Signage • Section 10-20-9 of the Zoning Ordinance provides criteria related to business zoning district signage. Please refer to the following link to the Sign Ordinance for additional information: https://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php?book_id=415&ft=4&find=10-20 Landscape Ordinance • It is anticipated that the property will need to be cleared in preparation for the installation of the nursery site. Per Section 8-12-2-H of the Landscape Ordinance, a Tree Preservation Plan is required for all lots five (5) acres or greater in area. No live trees with a four inch (4”) DBH (diameter breast height) may be removed without first submitting an application for tree removal and receiving approval from the City. Please provide, if required. • Please refer to the following link to the Landscape Ordinance for additional information: http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index.php?book_id=415 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memorandum. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #8 Tracking Number EDC 2019-15 Raintree Village – Economic Incentive/Development Agreement Economic Development Committee - February 5, 2019 Majority Vote Proposed agreement for fee locks, prepayment of fees & park construction to allow for the build-out of the remaining residential lots. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department 1 Request Summary: An application has been filed with the City of Yorkville by the CalAtlantic Group, Inc., the contract purchaser of lots within the Raintree Village subdivision, seeking approval of an economic incentive/development agreement which which would spur the build-out of the remaining residential dwelling units. The proposed agreement would establish provisions related to fee schedule and a fee lock for 5 years; lump sum prepayment of $384,300 for certain impact fees; prepayment of $135,000 for the SSA improvement fund for the completion of certain infrastructure projects; front funding of $93,000 for park construction and enhancements in Unit 4; and certain building code locks. Background: In March 1997, the City approved the original annexation agreement for the Raintree Village development. Subsequent annexation agreement amendments approved in 1999, 2002, 2004 and 2005 followed, establishing the approximately 190-acre subdivision consisting of roughly 650 single-family, duplex and townhome dwelling units. While the original developer/owners, Windham Deerpoint and successor builder Lennar, proceeded to build out 288 dwelling units, the economic conditions in the home construction market soured and the development stalled. The incomplete subdivision eventually was succeeded over to MS Rialto Raintree Village IL and MS Rialto Raintree Village, II, LLC, the current owners. There are currently 366 dwelling units (257 lots) that remain vacant. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Brad Sanderson, EEI Date: January 30, 2019 Subject: Raintree Village – Economic Incentive/Development Agreement Proposed Agreement for Fee Locks, Prepayment of Fees & Park Construction to Allow for the Build-Out of the Remaining Residential Lots 2 Special Service Area (SSA) Fund & Recent Infrastructure Improvements At the time of the original 1997 annexation, Special Service Area (SSA) bonds were issued to fund the construction of the public improvements installed to service the subdivision. The bonds were attached to the individual home sites and are repaid as a line item on the property owners real estate taxes. Due to over half of the development remaining unbuilt, the property tax revenue generated from the existing residents does not adequately cover the debt service owed on the SSA bonds. Recognizing the impact the economic downturn had on development, in 2013, the City amended the annexation agreement for the fifth time to help position the property for completion. As part of that amendment, the successor owner, MS Rialto, would pay the real estate taxes and SSA payments on all vacant lots within Units 1-6 for tax years 2011-2013. While this was done, the parcels remained undeveloped and the accrued SSA taxes on the unbuilt lots (including the fees, interest and penalties) rendered the lots “economically infeasible” to purchase and construct homes. In 2014, the City called the previous developer’s performance bonds and began punchlist work and paving in Units 4, 5, and 6 of the Raintree Village Subdivision. The work generally consisted of utility punchlist repairs, landscaping repairs and roadway paving and striping completion. These items have subsequently been accepted by the City as publicly owned infrastructure. However, all back of curb site development and parkway construction adjacent to each home site, such as driveways, parkway trees, sidewalks, remains the responsibility of the homebuilder. According to the most recent City Engineer’s estimate, the remaining infrastructure improvements total approximately $300,000. This consists of punchlist items related to street light installation/repair, street sign installation and basin maintenance. Currently, the fund balance of the SSA is roughly $165,000, leaving a deficit of $135,000 of which the City would be responsible for covering. The petitioner, CalAtlantic, has stated they are now in the position to acquire the lots. They are also currently in negotiations with the bond holders to purchase the outstanding SSA bonds, and Kendall County to settle the unpaid real estate taxes on the vacant lots. CalAtlantic has also proposed to front fund to the City the $135,000 SSA improvement fund balance deficit. Current Development Status, Permit Fees & Recent Infrastructure Improvements: As previously mentioned, there are 366 units (257 lots) consisting of single-family, duplex and townhomes dwellings which remain vacant, as illustrated in the map below. 3 At the time of the 2002 and 2004 annexation agreement amendment approval, the prior developer prepaid certain building permit fees (prepaid ½ of school transition fee; prepaid water connection fee for Units 1-4; and prepaid $1,800 of the $2,000 city sewer connection fee for Units 1-6). The building permit fees for the Raintree Development were locked as part of the 2013 annexation agreement amendment for five (5) years or until August 22, 2018. Since the fee lock expiration, the most significant change in building permit fees affecting this development were the increase in water connection fees ($800 to $5,554) and development impact fees (from $1,050 to $2,500) per permit. Proposed Economic Development Agreement Terms: According to the petitioner, to make the construction of dwelling units in Raintree Village financially feasible, which will benefit the City, its residents and all relevant taxing bodies, CalAtlantic seeks City approval of an Economic Incentive Development Agreement (EDA) on the terms summarized below: 1. The City has accepted all public improvements that have been constructed in Units 1 through 6 of Raintree Village as of the effective date of this EDA and has assumed the role of developer of those units by utilizing the SSA improvement bonds for the completion of all unconstructed public and private improvements secured by those bonds. For that reason, CalAtlantic will not be responsible for incomplete subdivision improvements or correction of any deficiencies in existing common or public subdivision improvements, and in the EDA will be referred to as “Builder,” not “Developer.” 2. CalAtlantic will only be responsible for completion of (i) residential lot improvements as CalAtlantic constructs dwelling units on such lots and (ii) sidewalk, street tree and sod improvements adjacent to such lots, all in accordance with the existing approved engineering and landscape plans for the Subject Property. o Specifically, this includes:  Replacing/maintaining the landscaping in the common areas including the replacement of dead trees and vegetation that exists as of the date of this agreement. Modifications from the approved landscape plan will be acceptable by the City, provided the changes are reasonable.  Damage to any completed City public improvements caused by the construction of houseline construction. The City and the petitioner will agree to video the existing conditions ahead of houseline construction.  Any minor utility structure adjustments (up to 12”) required by the houseline construction.  Punchlist items associated with the water service connections required by houseline construction 3. The City will complete and maintain all (i) public improvements, including, without limitation, sanitary sewers and manholes, valves and fire hydrants (minus water service), storm sewer, recommissioning of inactive water mains necessary to provide such services to the Subject Property (ii) common buffers, medians, outlot sidewalks, parkways and outlot grading, and (iii) all other improvement obligations of the original developer of Units 1 through 6 of Raintree Village inclusive of streets, curb and gutter and pavement. 4. In its construction of dwelling units on the Subject Property during the term of the EDA, CalAtlantic shall be required to pay only those building permit fees and impact fees that are 4 identified on the attached Fee Schedule. CalAtlantic will pay those fees as and when it receives building permits to construct such dwelling units. (Water connection fees for Units 1-4 have already been paid in full. Water connection fees for Units 5-6 shall be fixed at the amount identified in the Fee Schedule for five years from the EDA’s effective date.) Upon expiration of the aforesaid five-year period, water connection fees shall be those established by City ordinance for residential developments throughout the City; provided, however, that CalAtlantic shall have the right to pre-pay those water connection fees prior to expiration of the aforesaid five-year period. In addition, CalAtlantic shall have the right to pre-pay all other fees on the Fess Schedule prior to expiration of the term of the EDA. (Refer to attached draft Raintree Fee Schedule). 5. Within one year of CalAtlantic’s acquisition of the Subject Property, CalAtlantic will pay the City $93,000 so that the City can improve the Lot 286 park site in Unit 4 (“Park Site”) in accordance with the Park Concept Plan prepared by Gary R. Weber Associates, Inc., dated October 23, 2018 (“Park Concept Plan”). o The City will agree to construct the park site within two (2) years of receiving funds from the petitioner and the petitioner will provide elevations and/or sketch details of the proposed shelter for the park, as illustrated on the park plan, to ensure the final product meets the design standards of both the petitioner and City. 6. Within 30 days of CalAtlantic’s acquisition of the Subject Property, CalAtlantic will pay to the City $519,300 as full compensation for all Public Works, Police, Library and Bristol Kendall Fire District impact fees associated with the Subject Property. This amount also includes the payment of $135,000 for the outstanding public improvements. No additional impact or land-cash fees shall be due or payable in connection with CalAtlantic’s construction of dwelling units on the Subject Property. 7. Single-family detached dwelling units constructed on the Subject Property shall not be required to be equipped with a fire suppression sprinkler system. Single-family attached townhouse and duplex dwelling units shall be equipped with a fire suppression sprinkler system in accordance with the City’s currently adopted international building codes. 8. The EDA shall become null and void if CalAtlantic fails to acquire the Subject Property by a date certain, as such date may be extended at the request of CalAtlantic with the approval of the Corporate Authorities and shall expire on the first to occur of ten years from the EDA’s effective date or at the time CalAtlantic no longer owns any portion of the Subject Property. 9. All terms and provisions of annexation agreements pertaining to the Subject Property in effect on the effective date of the EDA shall remain in effect. In the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions of those agreements and the EDA, the terms and provisions of the EDA shall prevail. Staff Comments: Staff has worked with the petitioner over the past several months to reconcile the building permit fees obligated and paid for this development by the previous owner. We have also reviewed with the City Engineer the most recent punchlist regarding the outstanding work items for the public improvements completed by the City (see attached). Since this request is for an economic incentive/ development agreement, a public hearing is not required. Should the matter proceed out of committee, staff has tentatively scheduled it for discussion before the entire City Council at the February 26, 2019 meeting. The City Attorney will have a draft of the proposed agreement and approving ordinance at that meeting for your review. Staff and the petitioner will be available at the EDC meeting to answer any questions. Narrative to Application for Approval of Economic Incentive Development Agreement (CalAtlantic Group, Inc./Raintree Village) CalAtlantic Group, Inc., as contract purchaser of 257 lots in the Raintree Village community which were platted for purposes of constructing 366 single-family detached and attached dwelling units on the subject property (the “Subject Lots”), is applying to the City of Yorkville for approval of an Economic Incentive Development Agreement that contains the terms set forth on Exhibit I to the application, so that the build-out of dwelling units in Raintree Village, as contemplated by the City more than 20 years ago, can be completed. After the City approved the Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement for Raintree Village in March 1997, Special Service Area bonds (“SSA Bonds”) were issued to fund the construction of the public improvements designed to serve Raintree Village. Although the subject property was developed and homes built in the years that followed, the financial crisis commencing in December 2007 and the resulting collapse of the housing market brought dwelling construction to a standstill. Since that time, taxes levied against the lots in the community to pay the debt service on the SSA Bonds continue to accrue. Today, 366 out of the 654 dwelling units planned for construction in Raintree Village remain unbuilt. The vacant state of the Subject Lots, which constitutes 56% of the lots in Raintree Village, has precluded the generation of adequate property tax revenue to pay either debt service on the SSA Bonds or the costs of maintaining previously constructed public improvements in Raintree Village which are now owned by the City. Today, the accrued SSA taxes, including associated fees, interest and penalties, when added to land costs, home building costs and increased City permit fees, have together rendered construction of dwelling units on the Subject Lots economically infeasible. Consequently, neither the City, nor other units of government nor the holders of the SSA Bonds are receiving property tax revenues from the Subject Lots because they have no taxable value. By contrast, CalAtlantic projects that the taxable value of the Subject Lots could increase to approximately $27.2M if CalAtlantic acquires and constructs dwelling units on them. To make the construction of dwelling units in Raintree Village financially feasible, which will benefit the City, its residents and all relevant taxing bodies, CalAtlantic seeks City approval of an Economic Incentive Development Agreement on the terms described in the exhibits to this application. Those terms include CalAtlantic’s agreement to pay the City, within 30 days of CalAtlantic’s acquisition of the Subject Lots, a prepayment of $384,300 in Public Works, Police, Library, and Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District impact fees, and its agreement to pay the City $93,000 so that the City can improve the Lot 286 park site in Unit 4. The implementation of the proposed Economic Incentive Development Agreement will not only foster the complete build-out of Raintree Village; it will also: (i) enable the City and other taxing bodies to realize substantial economic benefits that they will not realize from if the build-out of dwelling units in Raintree Village is not completed, (ii) provide a more attractive and useful recreational area on the Lot 286 park site; and (iii) produce a steady revenue stream to the City and the Raintree Village homeowner’s associations which will make it possible for them to maintain all public and common area improvements in Raintree Village for years to come. {30084: 307: 02501671.DOCX : } EXHIBIT A PARCEL 1: LOTS 4, 10, 13, 14 AND 16 IN RAINTREE VILLAGE UNIT ONE, BEING A SUBDIVISION IN PART OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED JANUARY 13, 2004 AS DOCUMENT 200400000938, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: LOTS 139 TO 143, INCLUSIVE, AND LOT 147 IN RAINTREE VILLAGE UNIT TWO, BEING A SUBDIVISION IN PART OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED AUGUST 19, 2004 AS DOCUMENT 200400023274, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 3: LOTS 234 TO 237, INCLUSIVE, AND LOTS 240 TO 244, INCLUSIVE, IN RAINTREE VILLAGE UNIT THREE, BEING A SUBDIVISION IN PART OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED AUGUST 19, 2004 AS DOCUMENT 200400023275, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 4: LOTS 264 TO 282, INCLUSIVE, AND LOTS 262,263,283,284 AND 285 (LESS ANY PART OF SAID LOTS IN RAINTREE VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM) AND INCLUDING 'EBE' LOTS 287 TO 292, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 297 AND 298 AND LOTS 300 TO 318, INCLUSIVE, IN RAINTREE VILLAGE UNIT FOUR, BEING A SUBDIVISION IN PART OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED MAY 30, 2006 AS DOCUMENT 200600015999, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 5: LOT 341, LOTS 346 TO 428, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 430 TO 432, INCLUSIVE, AND LOTS 436 TO 438, INCLUSIVE, IN RAINTREE VILLAGE UNIT FIVE, BEING A SUBDIVISION IN PART OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED JUNE 20, 2005 AS DOCUMENT 200500017195, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 6: LOTS 439 TO 466, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 469 TO 483, INCLUSIVE, AND LOTS 485 TO 542, INCLUSIVE, IN RAINTREE VILLAGE UNIT SIX, BEING SUBDIVISION IN PART OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED NOVEMBER 7, 2007 AS DOCUMENT 200700032691, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. EXHIBIT B {30084: 307: 02495857.DOCX :2 } 1 Unit Lot Address Street Product PIN 1 4 1920 Raintree Road SF 05- 04- 401- 016 1 10 481 Hazeltine Way SF 05- 04- 378- 008 1 13 421 Hazeltine Way SF 05- 04- 378- 005 1 14 401 Hazeltine Way SF 05- 04- 378- 004 1 16 371 Hazeltine Way SF 05- 04- 378- 002 2 139 2010 Ingemunson Lane SF 05- 03- 354- 001 2 140 2022 Ingemunson Lane SF 05- 03- 354- 002 2 141 2034 Ingemunson Lane SF 05- 03- 354- 003 2 142 2046 Ingemunson Lane SF 05- 03- 354- 004 2 143 2058 Ingemunson Lane SF 05- 03- 354- 005 2 147 2093 Ingemunson Lane SF 05- 10- 103- 006 3 234 2123 / 2125 Bluebird Lane Duplex 05- 03- 354- 007 3 235 2135 / 2137 Bluebird Lane Duplex 05- 03- 354- 008 3 236 2147 / 2149 Bluebird Lane Duplex 05- 03- 378- 001 3 237 2159 / 2161 Bluebird Lane Duplex 05- 03- 378- 002 3 240 2195 / 2197 Bluebird Lane Duplex 05- 10- 125- 002 3 241 2192 / 2194 Bluebird Lane Duplex 05- 03- 377- 001 3 242 2172 / 2174 Bluebird Lane Duplex 05- 03- 377- 002 3 243 1052 / 1054 Canary Ave Duplex 05- 03- 377- 003 3 244 1062 / 1064 Canary Ave Duplex 05- 03- 337- 004 4 264 1322 / 1324 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 03- 381- 005 4 265 1312 / 1320 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 001 4 266 1302 / 1304 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 002 4 267 1292 / 1294 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 003 4 268 1282 / 1284 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 004 4 269 1272 / 1274 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 005 4 270 1262 / 1264 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 006 4 271 1252 / 1254 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 007 4 272 1242 / 1244 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 008 4 273 1232 / 1234 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 009 4 274 1222 / 1224 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 010 4 275 1212 /1220 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 011 4 276 1202 / 1204 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 012 4 277 1196 / 1198 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 013 4 278 1192 / 1194 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 014 4 279 1186 / 1188 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 015 4 280 1182 / 1184 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 016 4 281 1176 / 1178 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 017 4 282 1172 / 1174 Hawk Hollow Drive Duplex 05- 10- 128- 018 4 287 1842 /1844 /1846 /1848 Wren Road Townhome 05- 03- 382 -002 4 288 1852 /1854/1856 /1858 Wren Road Townhome 05- 03- 382- 003 4 289 1861 / 1863 / 1865 / 1867 Wren Road Townhome 05- 03- 381- 001 4 290 1881 / 1883 / 1885 / 1887 Wren Road Townhome 05- 03- 381- 002 4 291 1332 / 1334 / 1336 / 1338 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 03- 381- 004 4 292 1342 /1344/1346 /1348 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 03- 381- 003 4 297 1121 / 1123 / 1125 / 1127 Goldfinch Avenue Townhome 05- 03- 379- 001 4 298 1101 / 1103 / 1105 / 1107 Goldfinch Avenue Townhome 05- 10- 126- 001 4 300 1110/1112 /1120/1122 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 128- 023 4 301 1124/1126 /1128 /1132 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 128- 022 4 302 1134/1136 /1138 /1142 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 128- 021 4 303 1144/1146/1148/1152 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 128- 020 4 304 1154/1156 /1158 /1162 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 128- 019 4 305 1159 / 1161 / 1163 / 1165 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 127- 009 4 306 1151 / 1153 / 1155 / 1157 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 127- 010 4 307 1143/1145/1147/1149 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 127- 011 4 308 1135/1137/1139/1141 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 127- 012 4 309 1110/1112/1120/1122 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 127- 013 4 310 1109 / 1111 / 1121 / 1123 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 127- 014 4 311 1112/1120/1122/1124 Goldfinch Avenue Townhome 05- 10- 127- 001 4 312 2073 / 2075 / 2077 / 2079 Blueberry Hill Townhome 05- 10- 127- 002 4 313 2083 / 2085 / 2087 / 2089 Blueberry Hill Townhome 05- 10- 127- 003 4 314 1251 / 1253 / 1255 / 1257 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 127- 004 4 315 1241 / 1243 / 1245 / 1247 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 127- 005 4 316 1231 / 1233 / 1235 / 1237 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 127- 006 4 317 1221 / 1223 / 1225 / 1227 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 127- 007 4 318 1201 / 1203 / 1205 / 1207 Hawk Hollow Drive Townhome 05- 10- 127- 008 5 341 2056 Hearthstone Avenue SF 05- 09- 232- 003 EXHIBIT B {30084: 307: 02495857.DOCX :2 } 2 Unit Lot Address Street Product PIN 5 346 2077 Hearthstone Avenue SF 05- 09- 231- 004 5 347 2120 Hartfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 231- 003 5 348 2112 Hartfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 231- 002 5 349 2104 Hartfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 231- 001 5 350 2121 Hartfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 226- 003 5 351 2143 Hartfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 233- 003 5 352 581 Warbler Lane SF 05- 09- 233- 001 5 353 576 Warbler Lane SF 05- 09- 213- 008 5 354 564 Warbler Lane SF 05- 09- 213- 007 5 355 556 Warbler Lane SF 05- 09- 213- 006 5 356 548 Warbler Lane SF 05- 09- 213- 005 5 357 536 Warbler Lane SF 05- 09- 213- 004 5 358 524 Warbler Lane SF 05- 09- 213- 003 5 359 512 Warbler Lane SF 05- 09- 213- 002 5 360 520 Warbler Lane SF 05- 09- 213- 001 5 361 467 Parkside Lane SF 05- 09- 211- 009 5 362 463 Parkside Lane SF 05- 09- 211- 010 5 363 459 Parkside Lane SF 05- 09- 211- 011 5 364 455 Parkside Lane SF 05- 09- 211- 012 5 365 451 Parkside Lane SF 05- 09- 211- 013 5 366 2201 Parkside Lane SF 05- 09- 215- 001 5 367 2111 Parkside Lane SF 05- 09- 215- 002 5 368 2223 Parkside Lane SF 05- 09- 215- 003 5 369 2235 Parkside Lane SF 05- 09- 215- 004 5 370 2247 Parkside Lane SF 05- 09- 215- 005 5 371 2259 Parkside Lane SF 05- 09- 215- 006 5 372 2289 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 216- 005 5 373 2281 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 216- 004 5 374 2275 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 237- 015 5 375 2263 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 237- 014 5 376 2251 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 237- 013 5 377 2243 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 237- 012 5 378 2235 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 237- 011 5 379 2227 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 237- 010 5 380 2211 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 237- 009 5 381 656 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 237- 008 5 382 638 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 237- 007 5 383 620 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 237- 006 5 384 584 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 237- 005 5 385 576 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 237- 004 5 386 568 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 237- 003 5 387 556 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 237- 002 5 388 544 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 237- 001 5 389 532 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 216- 003 5 390 520 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 216- 002 5 391 508 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 216- 001 5 392 509 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 214- 013 5 393 521 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 214- 012 5 394 533 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 214- 011 5 395 545 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 214- 010 5 396 557 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 214- 009 5 397 569 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 214- 008 5 398 577 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 236- 006 5 399 585 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 236- 005 5 400 593 Manchester Lane SF 05- 09- 236- 004 5 401 632 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 236- 003 5 402 602 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 236- 002 5 403 586 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 236- 001 5 404 582 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 214- 007 5 405 574 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 214- 006 5 406 562 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 214- 005 5 407 546 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 214- 004 5 408 534 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 214- 003 5 409 522 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 214- 002 5 410 510 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 214- 001 5 411 511 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 213- 017 5 412 523 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 213- 016 EXHIBIT B {30084: 307: 02495857.DOCX :2 } 3 Unit Lot Address Street Product PIN 5 413 535 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 213- 015 5 414 547 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 213- 014 5 415 559 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 213- 013 5 416 567 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 213- 012 5 417 575 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 213- 011 5 418 583 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 213- 010 5 419 591 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 213- 009 5 420 593 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 233- 002 5 421 2155 Coach Road SF 05- 09- 233- 004 5 422 2142 Hartfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 234- 001 5 423 2154 Hartfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 234- 002 5 424 2162 Hartfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 234- 003 5 425 2176 Hartfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 234- 004 5 426 2188 Hartfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 234- 005 5 427 2181 Hearthstone Avenue SF 05- 09- 234- 006 5 428 2165 Hearthstone Avenue SF 05- 09- 234- 007 5 430 2135 Hearthstone Avenue SF 05- 09- 234- 009 5 431 2121 Hearthstone Avenue SF 05- 09- 234- 010 5 432 2120 Hearthstone Avenue SF 05- 09- 235- 001 5 436 2168 Hearthstone Avenue SF 05- 09- 235- 005 5 437 2182 Hearthstone Avenue SF 05- 09- 235- 006 5 438 3194 Hearthstone Avenue SF 05- 09- 235- 007 6 439 2202 Hearthstone Avenue SF 05- 09- 235- 008 6 440 2220 Hearthstone Avenue SF 05- 09- 235- 009 6 441 2263 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 235- 010 6 442 2243 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 235- 011 6 443 2223 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 235- 012 6 444 2203 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 235- 013 6 445 2161 Country Hills Drive SF 05- 09- 235- 014 6 446 2141 Country Hills Drive SF 05- 09- 235- 015 6 447 2121 Country Hills Drive SF 05- 09- 235- 016 6 448 2101 Country Hills Drive SF 05- 09- 235- 017 6 449 2091 Country Hills Drive SF 05- 09- 235- 018 6 450 2088 Country Hills Drive SF 05- 09- 238- 001 6 451 2096 Country Hills Drive SF 05- 09- 238- 002 6 452 2120 Country Hills Drive SF 05- 09- 238- 003 6 453 2144 Country Hills Drive SF 05- 09- 238- 004 6 454 2176 Country Hills Drive SF 05- 09- 238- 005 6 455 2212 Country Hills Drive SF 05- 09- 238- 006 6 456 2131 Tremont Avenue SF 05- 09- 238- 007 6 457 2125 Tremont Avenue SF 05- 09- 238- 008 6 458 2111 Tremont Avenue SF 05- 09- 238- 009 6 459 2105 Tremont Avenue SF 05- 09- 238- 010 6 460 2104 Tremont Avenue SF 05- 10- 106- 001 6 461 2110 Tremont Avenue SF 05- 10- 106- 002 6 462 2124 Tremont Avenue SF 05- 10- 106- 003 6 463 2134 Tremont Avenue SF 05- 10- 106- 004 6 464 2144 Tremont Avenue SF 05- 10- 106- 005 6 465 2154 Tremont Avenue SF 05- 10- 106- 006 6 466 2164 Tremont Avenue SF 05- 10- 106- 007 6 469 2221 Country Hills Drive SF 05- 09- 242- 001 6 470 2201 Country Hills Drive SF 05- 09- 242- 002 6 471 2252 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 242- 003 6 472 2266 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 242- 004 6 473 2274 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 242- 005 6 474 2282 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 242- 006 6 475 2288 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 242- 007 6 476 2294 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 242- 008 6 477 2312 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 242- 009 6 478 2334 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 242- 010 6 479 2346 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 242- 011 6 480 2362 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 242- 012 6 481 2404 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 242- 013 6 482 2428 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 242- 014 6 483 2456 Richmond Avenue SF 05- 09- 242- 015 6 485 2493 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 016 6 486 2485 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 015 EXHIBIT B {30084: 307: 02495857.DOCX :2 } 4 Unit Lot Address Street Product PIN 6 487 2469 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 014 6 488 2451 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 013 6 489 2437 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 012 6 490 2425 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 011 6 491 2411 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 010 6 492 2407 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 009 6 493 2401 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 008 6 494 2387 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 007 6 495 2375 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 006 6 496 2361 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 005 6 497 2349 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 004 6 498 2333 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 003 6 499 2327 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 002 6 500 2305 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 243- 001 6 501 2288 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 239- 001 6 502 2282 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 239- 002 6 503 2276 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 239- 003 6 504 2264 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 239- 004 6 505 2248 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 239- 005 6 506 2236 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 239- 006 6 507 2222 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 239- 007 6 508 2204 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 239- 008 6 509 2196 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 239- 009 6 510 2182 Fairfax Way SF 05- 09- 239- 010 6 511 661 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 239- 011 6 512 641 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 239- 012 6 513 621 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 239- 013 6 514 601 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 239- 014 6 515 581 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 239- 015 6 516 561 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 239- 016 6 517 541 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 239- 017 6 518 521 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 239- 018 6 519 501 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 239- 019 6 520 502 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 001 6 521 522 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 002 6 522 542 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 0031 6 523 572 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 0041 6 524 602 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 005 6 525 622 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 006 6 526 642 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 007 6 527 662 Ashworth Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 008 6 528 665 Bramore Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 009 6 529 645 Bramore Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 010 6 530 625 Bramore Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 011 6 531 605 Bramore Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 012 6 532 555 Bramore Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 013 6 533 525 Bramore Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 014 6 534 505 Bramore Lane SF 05- 09- 240- 015 6 535 508 Bramore Lane SF 05- 09- 241- 001 6 536 538 Bramore Lane SF 05- 09- 241- 002 6 537 608 Bramore Lane SF 05- 09- 241- 003 6 538 648 Bramore Lane SF 05- 09- 241- 004 6 539 668 Bramore Lane SF 05- 09- 241- 005 6 540 2466 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 241- 006 6 541 2444 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 241- 007 6 542 2422 Fairfield Avenue SF 05- 09- 241- 008 EXHIBIT C {30084: 307: 02496033.DOCX : } 1 Property Owners: 1. Owner: MS Rialto Raintree Village IL, LLC, a Delaware LLC Address: c/o U.S. Home Corporation 25 Enterprise Drive, Suite 400 Aliso Veijo, California 92656 Email: sandy.goldberg@lennar.com 2. Owner: MS Rialto Raintree Village II IL, LLC, a Delaware LLC Address: c/o U.S. Home Corporation 25 Enterprise Drive, Suite 400 Aliso Veijo, California 92656 Email: sandy.goldberg@lennar.com 3. Owner: Raintree Village II L.L.C., an Illinois LLC Address: 1300 E. Woodfield Road, Suite 650 Schaumburg, IL 60173 Phone: 224-293-3100 Email: chris.gillen@lennar.com EXHIBIT D {30084: 307: 02501688.DOCX : } 1 NOT APPLICABLE EXHIBIT F {30084: 307: 02496350.DOCX : } 1 THERE ARE NO APPOINTED OR ELECTED OFFICIALS OF THE CITY OF YORKVILLE WHO OWN A PORTION OF THE PROJECT OR REAL ESTATE UNDERLYING THE PROJECT BLUEBERRY HILLHAWK HOLLOW DRIVEG O L D F I N C H A V E N U E PICNIC SHELTERSEATING AREASEATING AREAOPEN PLAYEXISTING TREESEXISTINGTREESPARK CONCEPT PLAN10/23/2018YORKVILLE, ILLINOISNORTHSCALE: 1"=60'60300RAINTREE VILLAGE LOT 286 Current Conditions (2018) Legend 200 ft N➤➤N © 2018 Google © 2018 Google © 2018 Google Raintree Village Lennar Corporation Yorkville, Illinois Preliminary Cost Opinion for Park Landscape Work. October 23, 2018 Page 1 of 1 Quantity Item Size Unit/Cost Extension SITE FURNISHINGS 6 PICNIC TABLE EA $1,800.00 $10,800.00 1 PICNIC SHELTER (METAL, PRE-FABRICATED)EA.$40,000.00 $40,000.00 2 6' BENCH EA $2,400.00 $4,800.00 200 PAVERS S.F.$18.00 $3,600.00 1,500 CONCRETE WALK S.F.$7.00 $10,500.00 TOTAL ADDITIONAL SITE FURNISHINGS $69,700.00 PARK PLANTINGS 17 ORNAMENTAL TREES 8' Ht.$375.00 $6,375.00 18 DECIDUOUS SHRUBS #5 $50.00 $900.00 180 PERENNIALS #1 $15.00 $2,700.00 50 GRASSES #1 $18.00 $900.00 10 MULCH C.Y.$50.00 $500.00 1 SOD (DISTURBED AREAS ONLY)ALLOW $3,500.00 $3,500.00 TOTAL PLANTINGS $14,875.00 COST SUMMARY ADDITIONAL SITE FURNISHINGS $69,700.00 PARK PLANTINGS $14,875.00 TOTAL $84,575.00 10% CONTINGENCY $8,457.50 GRAND TOTAL $93,032.50 L:\Projects\1_Cost_Estimates\2018 Projects\LN1815_ PRECE01_PARK.xls {30084: 307: 02501751.DOCX : } Raintree Village Proposed Economic Development Agreement (“EDA”) Terms By and Between the United City of Yorkville and CalAtlantic Group, Inc. • CalAtlantic is contract purchaser of 366 lots of record in Units 1 through 6 of Raintree Village (“Subject Property”). See legal description attached as Exhibit “A”. • The City has accepted all public improvements that have been constructed in Units 1 through 6 of Raintree Village as of the effective date of this EDA and has assumed the role of developer of those units by calling the performance bonds for the completion of all unconstructed public and private improvements secured by those bonds. For that reason, CalAtlantic will not be responsible for incomplete subdivision improvements or correction of any deficiencies in existing common or public subdivision improvements, and in the EDA will be referred to as “Builder,” not “Developer.” • CalAtlantic will only be responsible for completion of (i) residential lot improvements as CalAtlantic constructs dwelling units on such lots and (ii) sidewalk, street tree and sod improvements adjacent to such lots, all in accordance with the existing approved engineering and landscape plans for the Subject Property. • The City will complete and maintain all (i) public improvements, including, without limitation, dry utilities (e.g., electric, telecommunications and natural gas) and recommissioning of inactive water mains necessary to provide such services to the Subject Property (ii) common buffers, medians, outlot sidewalks, parkways and outlot grading, (iii) outlot landscape elements and (v) all other improvement obligations of the original developer of Units 1 through 6 of Raintree Village. • In its construction of dwelling units on the Subject Property during the term of the EDA, CalAtlantic shall be required to pay only those building permit fees and impact fees that are identified on the attached Fee Schedule. CalAtlantic will pay those fees as and when it receives building permits to construct such dwelling units. (Water connection fees for Units 1-4 have already been paid in full. Water connection fees for Units 5-6 shall be fixed at the amount identified in the Fee Schedule for five years from the EDA’s effective date.) Upon expiration of the aforesaid five-year period, water connection fees shall be those established by City ordinance for residential developments throughout the City; provided, however, that CalAtlantic shall have the right to pre-pay those water connection fees prior to expiration of the aforesaid five-year period. In addition, CalAtlantic shall have the right to pre-pay all other fees on the Fess Schedule prior to expiration of the term of the EDA. • Within one year of CalAtlantic’s acquisition of the Subject Property, CalAtlantic will pay the City $93,000 so that the City can improve the Lot 286 park site in Unit 4 (“Park Site”) in accordance with the Park Concept Plan prepared by Gary R. Weber Associates, Inc., dated October 23, 2018 (“Park Concept Plan”). {30084: 307: 02501751.DOCX : } • Within 30 days of CalAtlantic’s acquisition of the Subject Property, CalAtlantic will pay to the City $384,300 as full compensation for all Public Works, Police, Library and Bristol Kendall Fire District impact fees associated with the Subject Property. No additional impact or land-cash fees shall be due or payable in connection with CalAtlantic’s construction of dwelling units on the Subject Property. • Single-family detached dwelling units constructed on the Subject Property shall not be required to be equipped with a fire suppression sprinkler system. Single-family attached townhouse and duplex dwelling units shall be equipped with a fire suppression sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13D requirements. • The EDA shall become null and void if CalAtlantic fails to acquire the Subject Property by a date certain, as such date may be extended at the request of CalAtlantic with the approval of the Corporate Authorities, and shall expire on the first to occur of ten years from the EDA’s effective date or at the time CalAtlantic no longer owns any portion of the Subject Property. • All terms and provisions of annexation agreements pertaining to the Subject Property in effect on the effective date of the EDA shall remain in effect. In the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions of those agreements and the EDA, the terms and provisions of the EDA shall prevail. EXHIBIT J: RAINTREE UNITS 1-6 FEE SCHEDULE UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 Fees PER HOMESITE PER HOMESITE PER HOMESITE PER HOMESITE PER HOMESITE PER HOMESITE Building Permit REMAINING UNITS 5 6 18 146 90 101 Building Permit Fee (per master plan, not individual permit)$650 $650 $650 $650 $650 $650 Building Plan Review Fee (.20/SF)$0.20/sq. foot $0.20/sq. foot $0.20/sq. foot $0.20/sq. foot $0.20/sq. foot $0.20/sq. foot Water Meter Cost (not applicable to fee lock)$700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 Water and Sewer Inspection Fee $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 Public Walks and Driveway Inspection Fee $35 $35 $35 $35 $35 $35 TOTAL (Excludes plan review fee)$1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 Site Fees School District Transition Fee (prepaid 1/2 at Final Plat)$1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District Connection Fee $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 Water Connection Fee ( See Note 4, below)$0 $0 $0 $0 $3,700 $3,700 City Sewer Connection Fee $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Public Works (Development Impact Fee) - PREPAID PER THIS AGR.Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Police (Development Impact Fee) - PREPAID PER THIS AGR.Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Library (Development Impact Fee) - PREPAID PER THIS AGR.Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Bristol Kendall Fire District (Development Impact Fee) - PREPAID PER THIS AGR.Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Total (exclude Plan Review Fee)$2,900 $2,900 $2,900 $2,900 $6,600 $6,600 PERMITS $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 SITE FEES $2,900 $2,900 $2,900 $2,900 $6,600 $6,600 $4,310 $4,310 $4,310 $4,310 $8,010 $8,010 FEE NOTES: 2. School District Transition Fee (previously prepaid 1/2, $3,000 due at Final Plat)Payment in accordance with table and prior agreement 3. Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District Connection Fee (previously prepaid 1/2 of $2,800 fee)Payment in accordance with table and prior agreement 6. Development Impact Fee. Owner will prepay the City Development Fee in full for the balance of Lots in Units 1-6. In accordance with the following, and below: Per Unit # Units TOTAL Public Works (Development Impact Fee)$450 366 $164,700 Police (Development Impact Fee)$150 366 $54,900 Library (Development Impact Fee)$150 366 $54,900 Bristol Kendall Fire District (Development Impact Fee)$300 366 $109,800 TOTAL PREPAYMENT $1,050 $384,300 NO OTHER FEES WILL BE APPLICABLE DURING THE TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT 1. All Fees in Building Permit Fees Section will be paid in accordance with this table 4. Water Connection Fee: 5. Sewer Connection Fee, Not applicable. Fees paid in full up front. UNITS 5-6 Water Connection Fee payable in accordance to Table amounts for 5 years from the effective date of this agreement. Builder may prepay for any or all lots at the above price at any time prior to expiration. Any connection fees not prepaid by that date will be charged at the rate in effect and applied to developments at the time of permit. UNITS 1-4: Water Connection Fee not applicable. Fees paid up front. EXHIBIT J: RAINTREE UNITS 1-6 FEE SCHEDULE 1/29/2019 UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 6 Fees PER HOMESITE PER HOMESITE PER HOMESITE PER HOMESITE PER HOMESITE PER HOMESITE Building Permit REMAINING UNITS 5 6 146 18 90 101 Building Permit Fee $650 $650 $650 $650 $650 $650 Building Plan Review Fee (.20/SF)$0.20/sq. foot $0.20/sq. foot $0.20/sq. foot $0.20/sq. foot $0.20/sq. foot $0.20/sq. foot Water Meter Cost (not applicable to fee lock)$700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 Water and Sewer Inspection Fee $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 $25 Public Walks and Driveway Inspection Fee $35 $35 $35 $35 $35 $35 TOTAL (Excludes plan review fee)$1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 Site Fees School District Transition Fee (prepaid 1/2 at Final Plat)$1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District Connection Fee $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 Water Connection Fee ( See Note 4, below)$0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 $3,000 City Sewer Connection Fee $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Public Works (Development Impact Fee) - PREPAID PER THIS AGR.Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Police (Development Impact Fee) - PREPAID PER THIS AGR.Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Library (Development Impact Fee) - PREPAID PER THIS AGR.Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Bristol Kendall Fire District (Development Impact Fee) - PREPAID PER THIS AGR.Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Prepaid Total (exclude Plan Review Fee)$2,900 $2,900 $2,900 $2,900 $5,900 $5,900 PERMITS $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 $1,410 SITE FEES $2,900 $2,900 $2,900 $2,900 $5,900 $5,900 $4,310 $4,310 $4,310 $4,310 $7,310 $7,310 FEE NOTES: 2. School District Transition Fee $1,500 per permit (previously prepaid 1/2 of $3,000 total, $1,500 due at permit) 3. Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District Connection Fee $1,400 per permit (previously prepaid 1/2 of $2,800 fee total, $1400 due at permit) 6. Development Impact Fee. Owner will prepay the City Development Fee in full for the balance of Lots in Units 1-6. In accordance with the following, and below: Per Unit # Units TOTAL Public Works (Development Impact Fee)$450 366 $164,700 Police (Development Impact Fee)$150 366 $54,900 Library (Development Impact Fee)$150 366 $54,900 Bristol Kendall Fire District (Development Impact Fee)$300 366 $109,800 TOTAL PREPAYMENT- DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES $1,050 366 $384,300 7. Cash payment to United City of Yorkville for Public Improvement matters, per agreement:$135,000 TOTAL CASH PREPAYMENTS (ITEMS 6 & 7):$519,300 NO OTHER FEES WILL BE APPLICABLE DURING THE TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT 1. All Fees in Building Permit Fees Section will be paid in accordance with this table 4. Water Connection Fee: 5. Sewer Connection Fee, Not applicable. Fees paid in full up front. UNITS 5-6 Water Connection Fee payable in accordance to Table amounts for 5 years from the effective date of this agreement. Builder may prepay for any or all lots at the above price at any time prior to expiration. Any connection fees not prepaid by that date will be charged at the rate in effect and applied to developments at the time of permit. UNITS 1-4: Water Connection Fee not applicable. Fees paid up front. JOB NO:YO1822-C PREPARED BY:NLS DATE:January 15, 2019 PROJECT TITLE:RAINTREE VILLAGE - UNITS 4, 5 AND 6 ITEM UNIT NO.UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 1 LS 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 2 EACH 15 6,000.00$ 90,000.00$ 3 EACH 5 6,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 4 EACH 25 6,000.00$ 150,000.00$ 5 LS 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 6 EACH 3 1,005.00$ 3,015.00$ 7 EACH 3 1,005.00$ 3,015.00$ 8 EACH 3 1,005.00$ 3,015.00$ 294,045.00$ ENGINEERING AND CONTINGENCY 58,800.00$ TOTAL COST 352,845.00$ TOTAL ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST MAINTENANCE FOR BASIN H - UNIT 4 (2019) STREET LIGHT INSTALLLATION - UNIT 5 STREET LIGHT INSTALLLATION - UNIT 6 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost ITEM STREET LIGHT REPAIR - UNITS 4 & 5 MAINTENANCE FOR BASIN G - UNIT 6 (2019) STREET LIGHT INSTALLLATION - UNIT 4 MAINTENANCE FOR BASIN F - UNIT 6 (2019) SIGN INSTALLATION BASIN MAINTENANCE ROADWAY G:\Public\Yorkville\2018\YO1822-C Raintree Village-Lennar\Eng\EOPCC - 01-15-2019 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #9 Tracking Number EDC 2019-16 Unified Development Ordinance - RFP Economic Development Committee - February 5, 2019 10/23/18 Approval of RFP to solicit for UDO 2018-72 Majority Approval Approval of RFP award to Houseal Lavigne for a Unified Development Ordinance. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Summary: As the Economic Development Committee (EDC) will recall, in November staff solicited Request for Proposals (RFP) for a Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). At the close of the RFP, the City received a total of two (2) submissions. Upon evaluation of the methodology and proposed project scopes, the review panel, consisting of the Community Development Director, the Assistant City Administrator and the Senior Planner interviewed both respondent firms. While each candidates’ proposals were very strong, it was the decision of the review panel that the Houseal Lavigne Associate’s proposal was most impressive and provided an all- inclusive project methodology, previous “out-of-the-box” civic engagement programs and smart- code deliverable envisioned for the Unified Development Ordinance. Below is an overview of the selection process, review criteria, candidate analysis, and decision-making approach used as a basis for our joint recommendation. RFP Candidates: As previously mentioned, the City received two (2) submissions in response to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Request for Proposal. Below is a summary matrix of those submittals in alphabetical order. Firm Location Proposal Summary Highlights Cost Antero Group, LLC Chicago, IL • All “in-house” Project Team • Firm specializes in comprehensive plans, zoning ordinances, subdivision ordinances, commercial corridor plans, civil engineering and economic development services. • Team of unban designers, planners and civil engineers. • Emphasis on reviewing current regulations and review practices, as well as zoning cases form past 5-7 years to provide a “Key Issues Report” prior to engaging in the preparation of the draft UDO. • Traditional & Online Community Engagement Program $100,000 Houseal Lavigne Associates Chicago, IL • Partnered with enCode Plus (web -based “smart-code” technology) • Firm specializes in all areas of zoning, community planning, urban design, and economic development. Has also completed two (2) recent Unified Development Ordinances. • Emphasis on technical analysis & best management practices; district standards & concepts; development standards; subdivision design/improvements; and migration of written code to smart-code online with interactive site-specific zoning analysis capabilities. • Traditional and website/app-based Community Engagement Approach utilizing “map. Social” a proprietary map-based civic engagement platform. $140,610 Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Jason Engberg, Senior Planner Date: January 17, 2019 Subject: Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) – RFP Recommendation of Contract Award – Houseal Lavigne Review Criteria: Each proposal was ranked using the following criteria areas reviewed by staff: Methodology, Relevant Projects, Project Team Experience, Understanding of Local Conditions and Project Cost. Points were attributed to each criteria area, weighted by importance, to determine the firms’ ability to successfully complete the objectives of the RFP. After tabulating the scores of the staff who reviewed the proposals, an overall score was given. The maximum total score to be obtained by a proposal was 100 points. Below is a detailed description of each criteria area and the point valuation assigned to it. Methodology (40 points) This area reviewed the firm’s explanation of the general and technical approaches and processes to be employed for executing the requirements of the project objectives requested in the RFP which includes: • Review and assess the land use regulations of the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Control Ordinance and Standard Specifications, Landscape Ordinance, Stormwater Management Ordinance, Appearance Code and all other relevant City Ordinances governing development. • Identification of deficiencies and inconsistencies within these variance ordinances and propose recommendations prior to fully incorporating changes into the formal UDO draft document. • Modernization of design standards. • Alignment of the UDO with the goals and action steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan Update 2016. • Incorporate the Downtown Overlay District with streetscape master plan guidelines and Form Based Code regulations into the UDO. • Use of innovative methods to cooperatively develop regulations with City staff and consultants throughout the development of the UDO. • Integration of codes into a user-friendly format so that all development related regulations are consolidated into a single document and easily cross-referenced. Relevant Projects (20 points) A brief summary provided of at least three (3) recent relevant projects which are similar in scope to the Unified Development Ordinance RFP project objectives. The firms also submitted client contact information for the referenced projects. Project Team Experience (15 points) Resumes and credentials of all personnel assigned to the project including specific experiences each team member will contribute to the project as well as identifying and defining their individual roles. Understanding of Local Conditions (15 points) General knowledge of and familiarity with the current policies and ordinances (i.e., comprehensive plan) related to development in Yorkville, and specifically to the existing codes which regulate development (zoning, subdivision control, landscaping, appearance code, etc.) Project Cost (10 points) Submittal of a cost breakdown for the proposed Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) RFP, supplemented with appropriate explanatory detail and justifying costs and calculations. Candidate Analyses: Of the two (2) firms interviewed, Houseal Lavigne’s proposal scored the highest with a combined average score by the staff reviewers of 87 out a possible 100 points, as detailed below: ANTERO GROUP HOUSEAL LAVIGNE Methodology 33.0 38.3 Relevant Projects 13.3 18.3 Project Team Experience 12.3 13.3 Understanding of Local Conditions 12 10.6 Project Cost 9.3 6.6 TOTAL AGGREGATE SCORE 79.9/100 87.1/100 Houseal Lavigne Associates Proposal The above scoring was based on Houseal Lavigne’s proposal providing the strongest interview/in-person presentation, project methodology, partnership with enCode Plus for the robust web-based smart-code technology and depth of recent relevant projects of both submittals. Their proposal also offered an eight (8) step project approach detailed below under “Methodology”. Methodology The eight (8) step project approach proposed by Houseal Lavigne Associates consists of (1) Project Initiation & Outreach; (2) Technical Analysis & Best Practices; (3) Draft District Standards and Concepts; (4) General Development Standards; (5) Draft Subdivision Design/ Improvements; (6) Administrative & Procedural Standards; (7) Draft & Final UDO; (8) Web- based “Smart-Code” Integration. The scope of the work as detailed above will consist of several staff meetings; public workshops/focus groups; applicability assessment and research of existing and proposed codes; evaluation of neighborhoods, corridors, and districts; Planning and Zoning Commission workshops and meetings; public hearings; and development of “user-friendly” content as part of the smart code with interactive, site-specific zoning analysis capabilities. Relevant Projects Along with their thorough technical code and design approaches, Houseal Lavigne offered three (3) relevant project summaries all consisting of prior Unified Development Ordinances recently completed in Bloomington, Illinois, Ardmore, Oklahoma, and Cary, Illinois. These projects span over serval years, with the most recent in 2018 for Cary, Illinois which transformed the Village’s zoning ordinance into a UDO, addressing issues such as adding and consolidating districts based on non-conformities analysis, modernizing parking and landscaping standards, updating subdivision regulations and re-writing the sign ordinance to comply with recent court decisions. Staff has reviewed some of these studies and also contacted the former clients to understand the working relationship they had with Houseal Lavigne and the fulfillment of deliverables promised. Project Team Experience Houseal Lavigne has provided public sector clients with various urban planning design related services such as zoning ordinance update, downtown regulatory strategies and neighborhood zoning, as well as a unified development ordinance. The project team assembled for this Unified Development Ordinance proposes an interdisciplinary approach which allows for a more cohesive regulatory document and hi-tech end-product accessible to staff and the public. Understanding of Local Conditions During the in-person interview regarding their proposal for the Unified Development Ordinance RFP, Houseal Lavigne showed familiarity of the City’s recently adopted Comprehensive Plan Update; current awarded RFP for the Downtown Overlay District Master Streetscape Plan and Form-Based Code; as well as the existing ordinances related to zoning, landscaping, subdivision control and appearance standards. Project Cost & Project Schedule Per the proposal, Houseal Lavigne will provide the Unified Development Ordinance for $140,610.00, which includes approximately 1,040 hours of work. As presented, this proposal is estimated to have a total twenty-four (24) month completion schedule with the kick-off estimated in March 2019 and completion in December 2020. The fee estimate includes plan preparations, meeting attendance and public engagement workshops/forums, as well as the web-based “smart- code”, enCode Plus, implementation required as part of the RFP. While this proposal was the not the least of the submitted RFP fees, it was the most comprehensible and provided a more realistic projection of anticipated project hours. Additionally, the proposal provides the cost for yearly enCode Plus maintenance fees and pricing for optional features such as the embedded calculator. Staff proposes to include with this request the first year of enCode Plus maintenance (Advanced 180) at $5,250.00 and the embedder calculator at $2,500.00 for a total price of $148,360.00. Currently staff has budgeted $50,000.00 for FY 2019 (available now to initiate the project with HL and cover the start up with enCode Plus). Staff has also proposed $50,000 for FY 2020 (beginning April 2019), and will request an additional $50,000.00 in FY 2021 (beginning April 2020) to complete the project. This lines up perfectly with the estimated 2-year timeframe for completion proposed by the consultant with expected project close out in December 2020. Further, staff anticipates once the online “Smart-Code” platform is up and running, and with the proposed new city-wide ERP system , the Community Development Department can discontinue its current iWorqs property maintenance tracking and online permitting module and devote those annual contract fees (approximately $7K annually) to the enCode Plus system. The Antero Group Proposal The Antero Group’s overall aggregate score of 79.9 out of 100. Their interview presentation and interdisciplinary project team (urban designers, planners and civil engineers) placed them very competitively with the preferred candidate. However, where staff made the distinction between Houseal Lavigne Associates and the Antero Group was Houseal Lavigne’s vast catalogue of unified development ordinance preparation experience, site specific design capabilities, methodology and most importantly, the partnership with enCode Plus for the smart- code technology. Staff Recommendation: Based on the strong methodology, partnership with enCode Plus, reasonable proposed project costs, it is staff’s recommendation to award the RFP contract for the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) to Houseal Lavigne Associates for a commitment of $140,610.00 with the understating that additional fees to be paid directly to enCode Plus in the amount of $7,750 for 1st year maintenance and embedded calculator for a grand total of $148,360, as outlined in the RFP submittal. Staff and the award candidate will attend Tuesday’s meeting to answer any questions the EDC members may have regarding this recommendation. United City of Yorkville, IllinoisUnified Development OrdinanceProposal December 7, 2018 PLANNING DEVELOPMENTDESIGN HOUSEAL LAVIGNE ASSOCIATES, LLC CHICAGO, IL 188 West Randolph Street, Suite 200 Chicago, Illinois 60601 (312) 372-1008 www.hlplanning.com info@hlplanning.com December 7, 2018 Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director Unified City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Dear Ms. Barksdale-Noble, On behalf of Houseal Lavigne, I am pleased to submit this proposal for the preparation of a Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for the United City of Yorkville. Our depth of experience with the preparation of traditional and form-based codes, as well as design guidelines, for communities throughout the region, and the rest of the United States, makes us uniquely qualified to assist the City with this important project. Our firm’s approach to zoning will balance several important considerations, including the vision for the community as established in its 2016 Comprehensive Plan, the currently underway Downtown Overlay District and streetscape master plan guidelines, and local and regional market realities that will dictate future development. The UDO will create an ordinance environment intended to balance development with the existing form of the community, neighborhood context, site characteristics, and infrastructure and environmental capacities. We don’t presume one zoning approach will be best for a given community. Rather, we bring the expertise necessary to effectively balance euclidean zoning, form-based regulations, modernized design guidelines, performance-based standards, and simple, streamlined review processes into a code that is reflective of local opportunities and priorities. But no matter the context, a zoning code that is clear, concise, easy to use and understand, cooperatively developed, and directly supportive of the City’s goals—are the hallmarks of our approach to zoning. In addition to our community specific approach, Houseal Lavigne is nationally recognized for the integration of technology and graphics in planning and zoning. We strive to take the guesswork out of zoning by using a graphic approach to better communicate regulations in a user-friendly, easy-to-understand, and attractive manner. Our tables, flowcharts, diagrams, plans, and 3D visualizations have the ability to clearly detail every aspect of a zoning code, including bulk and site standards, development standards, use provisions, administrative procedures, and definitions, so that residents, builders, and developers can understand the intent of regulations, and staff, appointed officials, and elected leaders can interpret and administer the code consistently. We will utilize web-based and face-to-face public outreach to engage the Yorkville community and better understand the key issues and potential impacts of development regulations. At the request of the City, the final UDO will be delivered as a web-based “smart code”, integrating enCodePlus technology, with optional features available. We appreciate the opportunity to be considered for this important project and look forward to the prospect of working with you and the Yorkville community on the development of the City’s Unified Development Ordinance. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Houseal Lavigne John Houseal, FAICP Principal v Proposal Signature Form vii Section 1 Executive Summary 1 Section 2 Organizational Profile & Project Team 6 Section 3 Previous Project Experience 7 Section 4 Methodology 15 Section 5 Project Schedule 22 Section 6 Fee Proposal 23 Section 7 Appendix I TABLE OF CONTENTS viiUnified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne United City of Yorkville, Illinois | Unified Development Ordinance Request for Proposal10 PROPOSAL SIGNATURE FORM The undersigned, as proposal responder, declares that he/she has carefully examined all the items of the Specifications and Instructions herein that he/she fully understands and accepts the requirements of the same, and he/she agrees to furnish the specified items and will accept, in full payment therefore, the amount specified below. Proposals shall include all fees required. Note: terms are firm for 90 days. TOTAL PRICE: __________________________________________________________ FIRM NAME: __________________________________________________________ DATE: __________________________________________________________ ADDRESS: __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ TELEPHONE: __________________________________________________________ SIGNATURE: __________________________________________________________ (Person executing response & official capacity) $140,610 (includes Yorkville's one-time enCodePlus initiation fee) Houseal Lavigne 12/07/18 188 W. Randolph Street Chicago, IL (312) 372-1008 SECTION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne SECTION 1EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The staff proposed for the United City of Yorkville’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) project is made up of a team of professionals with specialized expertise in all areas of zoning, community outreach and engagement, comprehensive and strategic plan recommendation implementation, design standards, and efficient administrative and enforcement procedure development. Our Key Staff have been specifically chosen to provide the United City of Yorkville with a responsive, effective, creative, and user-friendly ordinance for this important project. Houseal Lavigne is an award-winning, innovation-based consulting firm specializing in all areas of zoning, community planning, urban design, and economic development. Houseal Lavigne has distinguished itself as an industry leader in technology and innovation and is recognized nationally for its zoning, outreach, plans, and graphics. Houseal Lavigne has worked with more than 300 communities across the country and has unparalleled experience in a wide variety of planning, zoning, and design projects. Houseal Lavigne prides itself on creativity, collaboration, and delivery of quality. Our Team’s approach prioritizes strong relationships, the exchange of ideas, embracing creativity, and commitment to the integration of technology, innovation, and best practices. Since our firm’s inception, Houseal Lavigne has received 12 awards for “Best Plan” from several state chapters of the American Planning Association (APA) and was awarded the APA’s 2014 National Planning Excellence Award for an Emerging Planning and Design Firm. This prestigious award recognizes our innovative planning approach, targeted implementation strategies, creative and effective outreach, integration of emergent technologies, industry-leading graphic communication, and overall influence on the professional planning profession across the United States. Firm Information Houseal Lavigne 188 W. Randolph St., Suite 200 Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 372-1008 Primary Contact John Houseal, FAICP Principal jhouseal@hlplanning.com (312) 372-1008 x 101 RECENT AWARDS 2018 IL APA Healthy Active Community Award Healthy Chicago 2.0 Special Achievement in GIS Award (Esri) Oshkosh Corporation World Headquarters / Lakeshore Redevelopment VA APA - Commonwealth Plan of the Year Award Bristol Comprehensive Plan 2017 IL APA - Outreach Award Envision Oak Park Comprehensive Plan 2016 MN APA - Innovation Award St. Cloud Comprehensive Plan 2015 MI APA - Daniel Burnham Award (Best Plan) Imagine Flint Master Plan 2014 American Planning Association National Planning Excellence Award for an Emerging Planning & Design Firm MI APA - Planning Excellence Award for Public Outreach - Imagine Flint Master Plan IA APA - Daniel Burnham Award (Best Plan) Coralville Community Plan 2013 Kane County Plan of the Year Award City of St. Charles Comprehensive Plan 2012 IL APA - Daniel Burnham Award (Best Plan) Village of Downers Grove Comprehensive Plan ACEC Illinois - Merit Award - Studies & Research IL 47 Corridor Plan 2 Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne Firm Profile Houseal Lavigne is an award-winning consulting firm specializing in all areas of community planning, economic development and urban design, with expertise in comprehensive planning, corridor planning, downtown planning, neighborhood planning, zoning, market analysis, project implementation and financing, and citizen engagement. We strive for a true collaboration of disciplines and talents, infusing all of our projects with creativity, realism, and insight. Houseal Lavigne provides a fresh approach to urban planning, a strong foundation in contemporary development practices, an insightful understanding of market and economic analysis, and an effective ability to conduct engaging community outreach. Our firm is able to meet the unique challenges of any planning project and develop creative solutions that ensure compatibility between both the existing and the new, and the built and natural environments. Houseal Lavigne provides services ranging from detailed economic analysis to long-term community visioning; from smaller site planning and design projects to larger regional studies; from creating exciting new transit-oriented development plans to revitalizing historic downtowns; and from shaping broad community strategies to creating context- sensitive zoning regulations. Houseal Lavigne consists of a team dedicated professionals experienced in community planning, urban design, and economic development. Our firm has worked with more than 250 communities in states across the country, providing professional planning services for both public and private sector clients. Houseal Lavigne is founded on a set of core principles that, when combined with our professional experience and expertise, creates a consulting firm that stands above the rest. These principles include Better Community Outreach, Commitment to Creativity, Graphic Communication, Technology Integration, and Client Satisfaction. Firm History Houseal Lavigne was founded in 2004 by John Houseal and Devin Lavigne. John and Devin first began working together in 2001 at the planning firm Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen & Payne (TPAP) where John served as a firm Principal and Devin as a Senior Associate. In 2003, TPAP was acquired by URS Corporation where John was promoted to Midwest Director of Urban Planning and Devin to Planning Manager of the Chicago office. In November 2004, they left URS to establish Houseal Lavigne. Despite a sluggish national economy, Houseal Lavigne has flourished, growing from the two founders working in a small room to a staff of 16 in a Downtown Chicago office working in 21 states throughout the nation. SERVICES Comprehensive Planning Downtown Planning Transit-Oriented Development Corridor Planning Neighborhood & Subarea Planning Zoning/Regulatory Controls Design Guidelines Land Planning & Site Design Park, Recreation & Trail Master Planning Market & Demographic Analysis Fiscal/Economic Impact Analysis Development Services Retainer Services 3Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne Approach to Planning The Houseal Lavigne team stands apart from other consultants with our understanding of the importance of the Unified Development Code assignment. We have nation-wide experience working with communities to develop new zoning and development regulations consistent with its comprehensive plan and see that it is implemented. Our expertise is built on a foundation of professional experience, sound planning and a track record of award-winning projects. Our approach combines extensive community outreach and participation, highly illustrative and user-friendly maps and graphics, and utilization of cutting-edge technologies. Our approach to this assignment will include and be guided by the following core principles: Focus on Urban Planning and Zoning. Houseal Lavigne specializes in community planning and writing user-friendly zoning ordinances. Our focus and size allow us to provide the creativity, flexibility, and responsiveness needed, without wasting precious resources. Foundation of Experience. Houseal Lavigne has extensive experience in community planning, visioning and goal setting, implementation strategies, comprehensive planning, economic development studies, urban design, and more. We have directed, managed, and assisted with similar planning assignments for communities across the country. Engaging Community Outreach. One of our greatest strengths is our ability to design and conduct engaging and effective community outreach. It is a vital part of all of our planning projects. It is important that all interested persons have the ability to participate in the planning process and to know they have been heard. We believe strongly in fostering a stewardship for the community and achieving a high level of community consensus for planning initiatives. Illustrative Format and Quality Graphics. All our projects incorporate a highly illustrative and graphic approach to communicating planning and development policies and recommendations. The results of this approach are reports and plans that are attractive, distinctive, and easy to use and understand. Technology Integration. Integrating appropriate technologies can greatly improve the planning process and product. We specialize in the use of GIS, designing and hosting project websites, online surveys, keypad polling, and utilizing 3d rendering to improve planning and development concepts. When designed and managed appropriately, these technologies greatly improve communication and involvement with the public. Vision, Creativity, and Innovation. We believe vision and creativity are among the most important components of good planning and design. Too often, vision and creativity are lacking in the planning process and final planning product. With the help of the community, we will establish a “vision” that captures the local spirit and character. Our fresh approach to planning and development will broaden the range of available options and maximize the potential of community resources. Targeted Implementation. Identifying the “next steps” to be taken is an important part of any good plan. Plans are not meant to sit idle on a shelf, but should be used on a regular and on-going basis as a foundation for decision-making. Our plans identify key implementation steps that should be taken to “jump start” the ultimate realization of a plan’s vision and recommendations. Commitment to Client Satisfaction. Our Firm’s primary focus is on client satisfaction. We pride ourselves on our professional relationships, reputation, and client references. We develop strong relationships with our clients and are often considered to be an extension of staff. We are responsive to clients’ concerns, we are available at anytime to assist with unforeseen events and issues, and we are committed to doing whatever it takes to serve the client. prepared by Houseal Lavigne Associates Hitchcock Design Group • McDonough AssociatesFebruary 6, 2008 Ogden Avenue Corridor Enhancement Initiativedraft - for review only prepared by Houseal Lavigne Associates Hitchcock Design Group • McDonough AssociatesFebruary 6, 2008 Ogden Avenue Corridor Enhancement Initiative draft - for r e v i e w o n l y Rowhouses/Streetscape for 80’ Right-of-Way Prairie Grove Town Center 05/30/06 RE D H A W K REDHAWKNWEST STREET OSWEGO ROAD WASHINGTON STREETMARTIN AVENUEHILLSIDE AVENUEWEBSTER STREET BROM DRIVEOSLER DRIVEAUR OR A A V E N U E Naperville Cemetery to remain Expanded Fitness Edward/NPD New Medical Buildings New Parking Deck New NPD Parking softball softball baseballsoftball little league little leaguepony pony New NPD Parking Existing Park Maintenance Without The Barn New Shared Parking Deck Naper Settlement with planned expansion Community Garden Plots to remain Linden Oaks to remain Sportsman’s Club to remain Von Oven Scout Camp to remain Dist #203 soccer fields to remain Existing Parking Deck Broeker Parkway to remain Existing Central High School with additions Reconfigured parking with plaza and Riverwalk connection Edward Hospital Reconfigured Knoch Park prepared by Houseal Lavigne Associates September 6, 2007 Caroline Martin Mitchell Properties Preliminary Concept Plans Existing Parking Deck Leased property purchased for shared parking facility Playground draft for discus s i o n p u r p o s e s o n l y a Expanded Tennis 4 Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne Project Understanding The United City of Yorkville Comprehensive Plan, updated in 2016, establishes policies and strategies to guide the community’s growth and development. The Plan identified zoning considerations to ensure that development regulations are made consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s goals and objectives. The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) needs to address the specific considerations and recommendations from the Comprehensive Plan, including allowances for new use and density provisions, updated subdivision regulations, and streamlined review and approval processes, among many others. The Zoning Ordinance was adopted in its entirety in 1974 and a major revision was adopted in November 2014. At present, the ordinance is not a simple-to-follow resource for the City, its residents, and prospective developers—as it should be. Houseal Lavigne will create a consolidated zoning district ordinance that better illustrates individual districts and organizes regulations and standards for those districts for easy access and interpretation. It is important to recognize that there are opportunities in a properly drafted zoning code that can actually remove barriers to investment, providing more flexible standards and clearer expectations for potential developments, while still meeting the community needs. Yorkville has experienced a period of rapid growth with a changing built landscape. The new ordinance must utilize the latest planning strategies to balance development projects with the existing form of the community. Modernized development standards are a means through which the City can start to realize its vision for the future. The new UDO will help guide Yorkville towards a better form of development, including landscaping, parking, signs, and more. Other local land use regulations were adopted as individual ordinances 5Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne outside of the Zoning Ordinance, including standalone landscaping, appearance, and stormwater management ordinances. This disconnected structure makes the code difficult to interpret and can cause inconsistencies, contradictions, and ambiguity. By cross- referencing and combining all land use and subdivision regulations, the new UDO will eliminate interpretation problems, provide much needed clarity, and better outcomes for built form. Form-based code regulations are very important for high-visibility areas like Downtown Yorkville, and the Downtown Yorkville Overlay district will be an important component of the UDO. While additional zoning overlays may be necessary, form-based regulations may not fit all other areas and districts in the community. A common zoning practice is the use of a “hybrid” code that unites form-based standards with traditional zoning elements. The result is a unified development ordinance that can meet the City’s goals with regards to aesthetics, design, and land use, with integrated graphics, renderings, illustrations, flowcharts, and tables for ease of use and understanding. Our team’s methods, described in the project Scope of Work, will encourage the community of the United City of Yorkville to consider important questions about the future of development, and the type of zoning that can best meet their objectives related to land use, design elements, and administrative process. The final ordinance will be a “contemporary” code that uses clear language, identifies and corrects problems with the current code, and leaves the City in a better position to interpret, administer, and enforce their regulations. SECTION 2 ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE & PROJECT TEAM 6Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne SECTION 2ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE & CONSULTANT TEAM The professional staff Houseal Lavigne proposes to assist the United City of Yorkville provides a collaboration of the disciplines and expertise necessary to undertake this zoning rewrite project. Our team is committed to developing creative solutions that ensure compatibility between the existing, new, built, and natural environments; providing Yorkville with consistent interpretations of its new Unified Development Ordinance; and implementing the intended outcome of its 2016 Comprehensive Plan. The following pages provide information regarding Houseal Lavigne’s key personnel that will be assigned to the Unified City of Yorkville’s UDO assignment. For this project, John Houseal will provide project oversight, and his experience and expertise will be leveraged as zoning text and approaches are developed and at key meetings and outreach efforts. Nik Davis will also be acting in an advisory role to ensure that the Yorkville UDO is rewritten in a manner that aligns with the City’s vision and is applicable and unique to the community through form- based code applicability analysis, design guideline recommendations, scenario testing and assessments, procedural modeling, and manage enCodePlus process. Carly Petersen will act as Project Manager and will be the primary contact person for staff. She will work with Jackie Wells in the research, diagnostics, and writing of the district and development standards, as well as the administration and procedures section of the code. Trisha Stevens will provide graphic support including, diagnostics, design and development standards, enCodePlus UDO document formatting, and maps and visualizations. Project ManagementProject Management Graphics SupportGraphics Support Alignment & Applicability enCodePlus Support Alignment & Applicability enCodePlus Support Project OversightProject Oversight Zoning SupportZoning Support Carly Petersen, AICP Trisha Stevens Nik Davis John Houseal, FAICP Jackie Wells Organizational Chart Note: Resumes for this proposed Consultant Team can be found in Section 7: Appendix SECTION 3 PREVIOUS PROJECT EXPERIENCE 7Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne SECTION 3 PREVIOUS PROJECT EXPERIENCE zoningpractice 3.12AmericAN PlANNiNg Associ A t i o N | page 7 Vol. 29, no. 3 Zoning practice is a monthl y p u b l i c a t i o n o f t h e a m e r i c a n p l a n n i n g a s s o c i a t i o n . s u b s c r i p t i o n s a r e available for $95 (U.s.) an d $ 1 2 0 ( f o r e i g n ) . W . p aul farmer, faicp, chief executive officer; William r. Klein, aicp, Director of researchZoning practice (issn 154 8 – 0 1 3 5 ) i s p r o d u c e d a t apa. Jim schwab, aicp, and David Morley, aicp, editors; Julie Von Bergen, assistant editor; lisa Barton, Desig n a n d p r o d u c t i o n . Missing and damaged prin t i s s u e s : contact customer service, a m e r i c a n p l a n n i n g a s s o c i a t i o n , 2 0 5 n . Michigan ave., suite 1200 , c h i c a g o , i l 6 0 6 0 1 ( 3 1 2 - 4 3 1 - 9 1 0 0 o r c u s t o m e r s e r v i c e @ p l a n n i n g . o r g ) w i t h i n 90 days of the publicatio n d a t e . i n c l u d e t h e n a m e o f t h e p u b l i c a t i o n , y e a r , v o l u m e a n d i s s u e n u m b e r o r month, and your name, mai l i n g a d d r e s s , a n d m e m b e r s h i p n u m b e r i f a p p l i c a b l e . copyright ©2012 by amer i c a n p l a n n i n g a s s o c i a t i o n , 2 0 5 n . M i c h i g a n a v e . , s u i t e 1 2 0 0 , c h i c a g o , i l 60601–5927. the americ a n p l a n n i n g a s s o c i a t i o n a l s o h a s o f f i c e s a t 1 0 3 0 1 5 t h s t . , n W, suite 750 West, Washington, Dc 20005–15 0 3 ; w w w . p l a n n i n g . o r g . all rights reserved. no pa r t o f t h i s p u b l i c a t i o n m a y b e r e p r o d u c e d o r u t i l i z e d i n a n y f o r m o r b y a n y means, electronic or mecha n i c a l , i n c l u d i n g p h o t o c o p y i n g , r e c o r d i n g , o r b y a n y i n f o r m a t i o n s t o r a g e a n d retrieval system, without p e r m i s s i o n i n w r i t i n g f r o m t h e a m e r i c a n p l a n n i n g a s s o c i a t i o n . printed on recycled pape r , i n c l u d i n g 5 0 - 7 0 % r e c y c l e d f i b e r a n d 1 0 % p o s t c o n s u m e r w a s t e . The cover depicts a google SketchUp model created to illust r a t e d e s i g n g u i d e l i n e s f o r t h e main street of a town ce n t e r d e v e l o p m e n t . © H o u s e a l L a v i g n e A s s o c i a t e s resoUrces • google sketchUp http://sketchup.google. c o m • google earth http://earth.google.com • Adobe Photoshop www.adobe.com/produc t s / p h o t o s h o p • Pictometry www.pictometry.com • Pictomtetry online http://pol.pictometry.co m • V-ray http://chaosgroup.com • city engine www.esri.com/software/cit y e n g i n e • 3D Warehouse http://sketchup.google.co m / 3 d w a r e h o u s e Planners can take advantage of Pictometry’s measuring tool to assist in building massing models in SketchUp. This model represents downtown Asheville, north Carolina. zoom into sections of your d e s i r e d a r e a a n d import smaller, higher re s o l u t i o n p i e c e s t h a t SketchUp will place in it s p r o p e r g e o g r a p h i c location, allowing you to “ s t i t c h ” t o g e t h e r multiple images. Combined with detailed m e a s u r i n g ability of Pictometry, Ske t c h U p c a n d e l i v e r a quick massing model of a n a r e a . T h i s c a n be used to serve as a sim p l e r e f e r e n c e d r a w - ing for notes and recom m e n d a t i o n s , o r a s a contextual model for de v e l o p m e n t visualization. conclUsion it is important to note that the programs, tools, and techniques i covered in this article are not the definitive list. Software companies will continue developing software, an d cutting-edge firms and in g e n i o u s p l a n n e r s will continue to find new w a y s t o c r e a t e b e t - ter documents. Take for instance City Engi n e . Developed by Procedura l i n S w i t z e r l a n d and recently acquired by E s r i , C i t y E n g i n e is a software application f o r t h e d e s i g n , planning, and modeling of c i t i e s a n d u r b a n environments in 3-D. City E n g i n e a l l o w s p r o - fessional users to quick l y g e n e r a t e 3 - D c i t i e s entertainment. City Engin e u s e r s c a n “ g r o w streets” based on differ e n t p a r a m e t e r s (i.e., curvilinear, block, or g a n i c ) a n d c r e a t e blocks that can be subdi v i d e d a n d “ d e v e l - oped” based on a set of r u l e s f o r s e t b a c k , lot size, building height, a n d s e v e r a l o t h e r parameters. Finally, as you begin to inc l u d e a n d introduce graphics and i l l u s t r a t i o n s t o improve the effectiveness a n d u s e r f r i e n d l i - from existing 2-D giS dat a ; d o c o n c e p t u a l design in 3-D, based on g i S d a t a a n d p r o c e - dural rules; and efficient l y m o d e l virtual 3-D urban environ - ments for simula- tion and ness of your products, r e m e m b e r t h a t e v e r y - thing conveyed in this arti c l e i s o n l y a t o o l or a technique and that s u p p o r t i n g g r a p h i c s should be used appropriat e l y . k n o w i n g when to use an illustratio n i s a s e q u a l l y i m - portant as how to do an i l l u s t r a t i o n .Zoning PracticeAMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION205 N. Michigan Ave.Suite 1200Chicago, IL 60601–59271030 15th Street, NWSuite 750 WestWashington, DC 20005–1503zoning Practice MARCh 2012 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION issue number 3 Practice visualization 3is your community making the most of new visualiZation tools?3 IS YOUR ZONING CALIBRATED TO HELP IMPLEMENT YOUR PLANS?ZONING PRACTICEAMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION205 N. Michigan Ave.Suite 1200Chicago, IL 60601–59271030 15th Street, NWSuite 750 WestWashington, DC 20005–1503ZONING PRACTICE AUGUST 2015 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 8 8 ISSUE NUMBER 8 PRACTICE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ZONINGPRACTICE 8.15 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION | page 7 Cover: Fuse/Thinkstock; design concept by Lisa Barton. VOL. 32, NO. 8 Zoning Practice is a monthly publication of the American Planning Association. Subscriptions are available for $95 (U.S.) and $120 (foreign). James M. Drinan, jd, Executive Director; David Rouse, aicp, Managing Director of Research and Advisory Services. Zoning Practice (ISSN 1548–0135) is produced at APA. Jim Schwab, aicp, and David Morley, aicp, Editors; Julie Von Bergen, Assistant Editor; Lisa Barton, Design and Production. Missing and damaged print issues: Contact Customer Service, American Planning Association, 205 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 1200, Chicago, IL 60601 (312-431- 9100 or customerservice@planning.org) within 90 days of the publication date. Include the name of the publication, year, volume and issue number or month, and your name, mailing address, and membership number if applicable. Copyright ©2015 by the American Planning Association, 205 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 1200, Chicago, IL 60601–5927. The American Planning Association also has offices at 1030 15th St., NW, Suite 750 West, Washington, DC 20005–1503; www.planning.org. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the American Planning Association. Printed on recycled paper, including 50-70% recycled fiber and 10% postconsumer waste. As part of the public review process, the Flint, Michigan, uses zoning kits to demonstrate the link between the master plan and proposed zoning regulations. This article is based upon the content developed for and presented at the 2015 APA National Planning Conference by John Houseal, aicp, principal and cofounder of Houseal Lavigne Associates; Douglas Hammel, aicp, senior associate with Houseal Lavigne Associates; Brandon Nolin, aicp, senior associate with Houseal Lavigne Associates; and Christina Bader, aicp, leed ap, director of marketing and special projects at Farr Associates. Content and editing assistance for this article was provided by John Houseal. Subject Matter Experts Houseal Lavigne has authored technical articles featured in the American Planning Association’s Zoning Practice publication. Topic of articles drafted by HLA staff include the integration of clear and user- friendly graphics in zoning ordinances, and the development of locally contextual and appropriate design guidelines and form-based codes. Houseal Lavigne has in-depth expertise and experience updating municipalities’ zoning ordinances, including amendments; complete re-writes of entire code sections; developing entirely new ordinances; creating unified development ordinances, planned- unit development ordinances and overlay districts; landscape ordinances; sign ordinances; Zoning Board of Appeals and Plan Commission support and training; administrative and procedural components; and more. Our experience with zoning and development regulations, coupled with our extensive expertise in several other areas of planning (comprehensive planning, downtown planning, neighborhood planning, site planning and development review, corridor planning, and more) allows us to create a responsive, appropriate, modernized, and user-friendly UDO that both implements and reflects the City’s vision, desires, and past planning efforts.. Zoning & Development Review Houseal Lavigne has provided zoning and development review and ZBA and Plan Commission support on an on-going basis for several communities, including River Forest, IL, Oakbrook Terrace, IL, Palos Park, IL, Palos Heights, IL, Kenilworth, IL, Harwood Heights, IL, Sugar Grove, IL, and many more. Expert Analysis & Testimony In addition, John Houseal, Principal Director, has served as a zoning expert regarding zoning related matters for several municipalities, including Marion, IA, LaGrange, IL, Countryside, IL, Oakbrook Terrace, IL, Chicago, IL, and more. Traditional and Form-based Codes Houseal Lavigne’s staff has extensive experience in assisting communities throughout the country in developing traditional or form-based development regulations. Our balanced approach of local character assessment, standards development and testing, stakeholder outreach, and analysis of appropriate procedures and review commissions takes into account the complete process of drafting and implementing regulations that are most locally appropriate. Communities in which Houseal Lavigne has developed traditional or form-based codes include, but are not limited to: • Baltimore, MD* • Benton Harbor, MI • Buffalo, NY* • Carpentersville, IL • Cary, IL • Chicago, IL • Cleveland Heights, OH* • Dunwoody, GA • Elmhurst, IL • Flint, MI • Fort Dodge, IA* • Harwood Heights, IL • Hinsdale, IL • Kenilworth, IL* • La Grange Park, IL • Marion, IA • Melrose Park, IL • Mundelein, IL* • Muskogee, OK • New Orleans, LA* • Northbrook, IL • Northfield, IL • Oak Brook, IL • Oak Brook Terrace, IL • Oak Park, IL* • Palos Park, IL • Palos Heights, IL • Park Ridge, IL* • Richton Park, IL • River Forest, IL • Riverside, IL* • Sunset Hills, MO • Wilmette, IL* • Winnebago County, IL* • Winnetka, IL Note: An asteriks (*) indicates work performed while employed at an other firm. 8 Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne E1-PD A1 B1 B2 B3 B3R B4 E1 M R1 R2 R2A R3 PO PUD Property Lines Water Map Features Zoning District Zoning Mapµ Village of Cary, IllinoisUnified Development Ordinance After completing a recent Comprehensive Plan for the Village of Cary, Houseal Lavigne updated the Village’s existing zoning ordinance to reflect the goals and vision established in that plan. The project involved transforming the Village’s zoning ordinance into a unified development ordinance (UDO), addressing issues such as adding and consolidating districts based on nonconformities analysis, modernizing parking and landscaping standards, updating subdivision regulations to support the development of walkable neighborhoods, and rewriting the sign ordinance to comply with Reed vs. the Town of Gilbert. 9Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne WOMACK MEADOWCREEK TRAILRIDGEOAK TRAILNANDINACHAMBLEE DUNWOODYCENTER HIDDEN R I D G E D U N W O O D Y C H ESTNUT RIDGEVERNON NORT HVILLAGE TE R R ACEC H A M BLEE DUN W O O D Y DUN W OODY VILLA G E BankFood Service/Restaurant/BarGas/Auto-OrientedGroceryInstitutional Office Pharmacy Residential Retail/Shopping/Clothing Vacant Study Area Boundary map legend City of Dunwoody, GeorgiaZoning Ordinance Update Houseal Lavigne, as part of a professional consul- tant team, assisted the City of Dunwoody with an update to its zoning ordinance. Dunwoody is located approximately 13 miles north of Downtown Atlanta, and is a thriving community with quality neighbor- hoods, high-end office development, and regional access via I-285. Dunwoody Village is the heart of the community, and includes retail, office, and residential development. Based on our previous experience on the Dunwoody Village Master Plan, Houseal Lavigne was charged with drafting form-based development regulations for the Dunwoody Village area and creating zoning graphics for the entirety of the new code. The form- based regulations aimed to preserve the southern colonial architecture style prevalent in Dunwoody Village, support multi-modal mobility and the City’s in- vestment in the Dunwoody Village Parkway complete street, and minimize the visual impacts of parking lots through site planning and landscaping standards. The graphics created for the code include plans, elevations and 3D visualizations of architectural elements, site design and building location standards, landscaping materials and buffers, and waterway protection areas. Transition Yard Parking Lot Interior Landscaping Multi-Dwelling Bulk Diagram 10 Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne Village of Kenilworth, IllinoisZoning Ordinance Update / Design & Development Guidelines Houseal Lavigne, in addition to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, created a set of detailed Design & Development Guidelines for a small and struggling commercial district. These Guidelines are intended to be used by Village staff when first sitting down with a developer to discuss an idea or concept, and by the Plan Commission and Village Board when evaluating and considering a more specific development proposal. The Guidelines address architectural style; building height; bulk and orientation; building materials; roofs and rooflines; doors, windows and ornamentation; pedestrian realm; parking and service areas; lighting and landscaping; and business signage and awnings. These Guidelines were designed to assist in preserving the unique architectural legacy of the Village while simultaneously allowing for select infill redevelopment. Although there exists some architecturally significant commercial structures along the corridor, many of the existing buildings and sites are underutilized, in poor condition, and are prime candidates for redevelopment. As part of a larger comprehensive plan assignment, which won the American Planning Association’s Illinois Chapter Award for “Best Plan”, Houseal Lavigne prepared Carpentersville’s first ever Planned Unit Development Ordinance (PUD), design and development guidelines, and a completely updated zoning ordinance. The PUD ordinance governs all large-scale, complex, or strategically-located developments, while the guidelines set standards of review to be met for all such developments. In addition, a complete overhaul of the Village’s residential districts, including single family detached, single-family attached, and multi-family residential districts was performed to contain specific development and design standards that carry the full weight of a standard zoning regulation. Since then, the Village has also engaged Houseal Lavigne to undertake a complete re-write of the commercial, industrial, and institutional district sections of the zoning ordinance. Village of Carpentersville, Illinois Zoning Ordinance Update, Planned Unit Development Ordinance & Design and Development Guidelines City of Muskogee, OklahomaComprehensive Plan & Zoning Ordinance Houseal Lavigne was retained by the City of Muskogee, Oklahoma to update the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The City is home to one of the most inland ports in the country and includes several major employers, healthcare facilities and universities. While the City has many assets it also has several challenges including an aging downtown and several commercial corridors and neighborhoods in need of improvement. Issues related to growth and annexation and extension of city services are an important consideration of the updated Comprehensive Plan. Of particular concern to the community is a zoning ordinance that includes districts and classifications that are no longer relevant. Code enforcement is also a growing issue for the community. As part of our engagement and immediately following the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan we will begin work on updating the City’s Zoning Ordinance and addressing code enforcement issues. 11Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne City Sunset Hills, MissouriComprehensive Plan & Zoning Ordinance Update Houseal Lavigne prepared a comprehensive plan that included detailed subarea plans for the City’s three major corridors, Watson Road, Lindbergh Boulevard and Gravois Road. The planning process included extensive community outreach including separate meeting for each of the corridors. In that there was ongoing development pressure within each of the corridor study areas, including proposed transportation improvements, the subarea planning process was expedited. This allowed the City to proceed with planning and review of pending development. Following plan adoption, Houseal Lavigne began working on a revision to the City’s zoning ordinance. The City has also engaged the firm to prepare development concepts for potential redevelopment sites within the Lindbergh and Watson corridors. Village of Harwood Heights, Illinois Zoning Ordinance Houseal Lavigne completed the Land Use and Airport Compatibility Plan for the Village of Harwood Heights, which included the creation of a new Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The goals of the new Comprehensive Plan (adopted in 2011) are to mitigate future land use conflicts, remediate existing conflicts, and leverage opportunities for economic growth, ensuring future prosperity and a high quality of life for Village residents. As part of the project, Houseal Lavigne also created an entirely new zoning ordinance to ensure that desired land use and development was being promoted in a strategic manner. The new community strategy, guided by the new comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance, has already yielded significant benefits as once dilapidated industrial areas are now being entitled and developed into highly successful commercial and retail development. The new Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance are effectively serving as tools of community transformation. Village of Richton Park, IllinoisComprehensive Plan & Zoning Ordinance Update Richton Park is located approximately 27 miles south of Downtown Chicago, and is at the fringe of regional development in the south suburbs. Houseal Lavigne assisted the Village of Richton Park with an update to its Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance through the grant provided by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP). The Comprehensive Plan focuses on stabilizing and preserving existing neighborhoods while ensuring that anticipated community development respects the character of the Village and its important natural features. The Plan includes a subarea plan for Sauk Trail Road, an emerging commercial corridor that links the community’s Town Center an interchange with I-55. This subarea plan identifies opportunities for the Village to take advantage of recent civic investment in order to revitalize aging commercial development. The Comprehensive Plan is serving as the foundation for an update to the Zoning ordinance that will consider sustainable development, community character, active transportation, and other priorities identified through the planning process. EXISTING DISTRICTS PROPOSED DISTRICTS NU R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 R-5 R-6 C-1 PD PD-R PD-RC PD-BC PD-LC (A) PD-LC (B) PD-LC (C) PD-MXD PD-LS PD-LI R-1 R-2 R-4 R-6 LC RC PO LI POS 12 Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne Village of River Forest, IllinoisComprehensive Plan & Zoning Ordinance Update The Village of River Forest is a mature community noted for its historic homes, beautiful neighborhoods, and tree lined streets. Houseal Lavigne has worked on several zoning related projects within the Village of River Forest. Most recently, we have assisted the Village with major amendments to the Single-Family Residential Districts. The purpose of the study was to establish residential zoning standards that: (1) Provide for more creativity and flexibility in the design of homes; (2) Encourage the rehabilitation and expansion of existing homes rather than the demolition and replacement of existing homes; and (3) Encourage new construction and additions that are respectful of and more in character with the established River Forest neighborhoods. Working with an Ad Hoc Committee comprised of six area architects, two Plan Commission members, and two Zoning Board of Appeals members, we developed new zoning standards addressing floor area ratio, height, setbacks, garage location and articulation, “canyon effect”, basements, and more. City of Chicago, IllinoisBroadway Avenue Zoning & Market Analysis The City of Chicago’s zoning reform in 2004 resulted in a neighborhood split over the most appropriate zoning of Broadway Avenue, between Foster Avenue and Devon Avenue. Houseal Lavigne, working with Loyola University and the City of Chicago, undertook a comprehensive analysis of the impacts of downzoning the corridor from B3-3 to B3-2 and provided a visual model of how the corridor would look under each zoning district. Village of Hinsdale, IllinoisOgden Avenue Corridor Plan & Overlay District As the Village’s prominent gateway and economic engine, the Ogden Avenue Corridor was not reflective of the character and quality of the Hinsdale community. Further, the Corridor was suffering from “dated” development insufficient to accommodate contemporary tenant requirements. The Ogden Avenue Corridor Plan, prepared by Houseal Lavigne created two distinct overlay districts as a foundation for the development of form-based zoning, established design and development guidelines to ensure the appropriate character and quality of new development, and identified strategies to improve the safety, mobility, and appearance of the Corridor. Village of Oak Brook, Illinois22nd Street / Commercial Corridor Plan, Sign Ordinance & PUD Ordinance Suffering from an outdated zoning ordinance and sign code, business and developers in Oak Brook were unable to appropriately sign building and development sites in a manner that accommodated the needs of tenants. Also, due to a lack of any planned unit development (PUD) ordinance, creative development was not being effectively accommodated. The Village retained Houseal Lavigne, as part of a larger corridor plan project, to develop a new sign ordinance and PUD ordinance that creatively addressed the unique needs of the business community, including contemporary development practices, mixed-use development, identification signage along I-290, high rise office building signage, office campuses, signage for large-scale mixed-use shopping centers, and much more. Rowhouses/Streetscape for 80’ Right-of-Way Prairie Grove Town Center 05/30/06 prepared by Houseal Lavigne Associates Hitchcock Design Group • McDonough AssociatesFebruary 6, 2008 Ogden Avenue Corridor Enhancement Initiative draft - for r e v i e w o n l y 13Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne City of Flint, MichiganFlint Zoning Code Flint, MI is a community in transition. Once an industrial leader in the auto industry, the City now has vast tracts of brownfields, disinvested and vacant neighborhoods, and empty commercial districts. It also has a thriving traditional downtown, nationally recognized cultural campus, and historic residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional architecture. Building upon the Imagine Flint Master Plan, the City is in the process of developing a new zoning code that will support the transformation and preservation of the community. Houseal Lavigne was retained to develop both the Flint Master Plan and new zoning code. The code integrates a variety of zoning approaches depending on priorities in different portions of the community. Historic areas utilize form-based regulations to preserve their character. Neighborhood regulations will allow for local food production, native plantings and ecosystems, and centralized stormwater management. Large brownfields, under the new Green Innovation zoning district, will be the testing ground for commercial energy production, materials recycling, and other emerging sustainable practices. City of Benton Harbor, MichiganZoning Ordinance Following the adoption of the community’s Master Plan, the City of Benton Harbor adopted a new Zoning Ordinance. Both the Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance were prepared by Houseal Lavigne. The new ordinance replaces the City’s previous code, which was adopted in the 1960s, and is designed to aid in the efficient implementation of Master Plan recommendations. The zoning ordinance focuses on encouraging invest- ment in commercial and industrial areas, protecting important natural features such as Lake Michigan’s shoreline areas and riparian areas along the St. Joseph and Paw Paw Rivers, revitalization of the historic Downtown area, and stabilization of Benton Harbor’s residential neighborhoods. A new planned unit development ordinance was created as part of the new ordinance to better facilitate creative development and context sensitive site solutions that had flexibility from strict application of zoning standards. City of Marion, Iowa Zoning Ordinance After completing the City’s Comprehensive Plan, Houseal Lavigne was retained to develop an entirely new zoning ordinance to reflect the recommendations of the plan. The update to the Marion, Iowa Comprehensive Plan came approximately ten years after the last adopted plan and had the goal of defining growth boundaries and planning for a projected increase in population. Houseal Lavigne led a process that included extensive citizen involvement, visioning, development of a growth strategy, brownfield site redevelopment recommendations, and detailed subarea plans for the City’s distinct neighborhoods. The Plan prioritized “place-making” to ensure Historic Uptown and the City’s neighborhoods were attractive and inviting, creating an enhanced quality of life and community character for all areas. The key issues addressed in the update to the City’s zoning ordinance included a new sign ordinance that enhances the appearance of the commercial areas, residential areas guidelines to improve the quality of housing with both new and established neighborhoods, and an landscaping regulations that promote the greening of new development and public rights of way. A new overlay district for the Uptown area and related 7th Street corridor was also incorporated into zoning regulations regarding signage, landscaping, height and bulk standards and setback regulations. 14 Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne Additional Zoning Experience In addition to the communities and projects identified previously, Houseal Lavigne’s zoning code experience includes the following communities, in which our firm covered a wide range of zoning issues: Ardmore, OK – Update and development of a new Unified Development Code to reflect and support the recommendations of the recently adopted Ardmore Comprehensive and Subarea Plans, which was also prepared by Houseal Lavigne. Bloomington, IL – Creation of a new Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Elmhurst, IL – Creation of a new Planned Unit Development Ordinance (PUD). Fairview Heights, IL – New zoning ordinance to reflect the recently adopted Comprehensive Plan, which was also prepared by Houseal Lavigne. Jackson, TN – Update and development of a new Zoning Ordinance to reflect and support the recommendations of the recently adopted One Jackson Civic Master Plan, which was also prepared by Houseal Lavigne. Melrose Park, IL – Zoning amendments for Adult Use Regulations and Sign Ordinance. Palos Park, IL – Overhaul of residential and commercial districts and creation of the Village’s first Planned Unit Development Ordinance for commercial and mixed-use development, including detailed design and development guidelines as required components of “Standards of Review”. Palos Heights, IL – Analysis of “teardown” zoning standards for bulk criteria and design. Winnetka, IL – Floor Area Ratio analysis for residential districts; Complete overhaul of administrative and departmental processes for development application, review, approval, and permitting. Wilmette, IL – Several zoning code amendments over a two year period and creation of the Village’s first Planned Unit Development Ordinance. SECTION 4 METHODOLOGY 15Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne SECTION 4 METHODOLOGY SCOPE OF WORK Below is a detailed, step-by-step, Scope of Work for completing the United City of Yorkville’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) assignment. The Scope of Work contains several steps, including staff meetings; public workshops; “best practices” research and applicability assessment; evaluation of neighborhoods, corridors, and districts; Plan Commission and City Commission workshops and meetings, public hearings, development of “user-friendly” formats, and more. Step 1: Project Initiation and Outreach Step 1 represents the kick-off of the project and is designed to provide City staff and the consultant team with opportunities to set project expectations and protocols, convey issues and concerns with the existing code, and engage those who administer and are impacted by the code. 1a: Project Initiation – Staff Meeting and Review of Preliminarily Issues This step will include a meeting with City staff to review various aspects of the project, including the schedule, expectations of local appointed and elected leaders, and public outreach and adoption process. The meeting will also provide an opportunity for staff and consultants to discuss any issues related to the present ordinances already identified by staff. If necessary, staff may lead a driving tour of the City to point out specific instances where current zoning and subdivision regulations either conflict with or complement community development objectives. 1b: Plan Commission Workshop This step will include a workshop with City staff and the Plan Commission (PC) to identify, review, and discuss zoning related matters within the City. The PC members have a unique perspective and insight into local zoning, planning, and development issues and will provide vital feedback and project focus. They also can articulate frustrations with current ordinances as policy tools, such as difficulties in navigating the document, unclear regulations, inconsistent references or definitions, issues with procedures and enforcement, etc. 1c: Residential Areas Zoning Workshop A workshop will be conducted with City residents to identify, review, and discuss zoning and ordinance related matters pertaining to the City’s residential areas/neighborhoods. Attendees could include residents, neighborhood groups, local builders, local residential architects, and more. 1 2 3 5 7 ProjectInitiation & Outreach Technical Analysis & Best Practices Draft DistrictStandards & Concepts General Development Standards Administrative & Procedural Standards Draft & Final UDO 4 6 Draft SubdivisionDesign/Improvements 8 Web-Based “Smart Code”Integration 16 Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne 1d: Commercial and Industrial Areas Zoning Workshop A workshop will be conducted with business owners and managers in the City. This workshop will allow the local business community to provide input regarding the impact of zoning and subdivision controls on their ability to invest in Yorkville, successfully operate a business, and meet the goals that the City has set forth for development. Attendees should include local business owners and managers, developers, local commercial and industrial property owners, and more. 1e: Subdivision Ordinance Focus Group We will work with City staff and officials to identify various stakeholders with extensive experience and understanding of the existing Subdivision Ordinance, including members of the development community, engineers, and significant property owners. We will reconcile preliminary findings with stakeholder input to ensure that recommended changes to subdivision regulations are vetted with respect to development realities. 1f: Project Website (Optional) Houseal Lavigne is recognized as a leader in technology-based outreach and community engagement. For this assignment, we will work with City staff to determine requirements for a project website that can be used to provide information regarding the zoning update process and documents available for review and comment though the course of the project. As an alternative, we can work with existing City protocol to distribute materials for review through the PC. The most appropriate approach will be determined through conversations with City staff during project initiation. 1g: map.social (Online Map-Based Engagement Platform) (Optional) Should Yorkville see value in implementing a unique project website, as described in step 1F, we will feature map.social, an interactive web-based community issues mapping tool, on the project website. Developed by Houseal Lavigne, this tool allows users to identify, map, and comment on geographic areas of concern and valued community amenities. map.social simplifies the mapping process and familiarizes users with areas the project may affect in a manner that is exciting, interactive, and effective. Input from users allows us to create a composite map of community issues to assist with the development of the UDO from the perspective of the community. Step 2: Technical Analysis & Best Practices Step 2 includes a full assessment of the current code, as well as the development of a conceptual approach to ensure that the new code addresses local issues and meets statutory requirements. 2a: Assessment of Existing Land Use Regulations A detailed and thorough review of the City’s existing ordinances, including Zoning and Subdivision Control Ordinances, Landscape Ordinance, Stormwater Management Ordinance, Appearance Code, Downtown Overlay Districts (adoption pending), and any other relevant ordinances, will be undertaken as a starting point for preparing the new ordinance. The existing code will also be evaluated with respect to the recommendations and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and other adopted policies. This step will highlight areas where the existing zoning district boundaries and related regulations are inconsistent with either what is currently built or what is envisioned as expressed in adopted plans and policies. This will establish a framework for the calibration of regulations to meet these conditions. 17Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne 2b: “Best Practices” Research and Assessment Extensive research will be undertaken to assess the best practices from around the region and country relating to zoning, development, and subdivision regulations. These best practices will be evaluated for appropriateness and applicability to the Yorkville community. Traditional zoning, form-based codes, hybrid zoning, incentive zoning, planned unit development ordinances, processes and procedures will all be examined for potential application to the City, its developed areas, and its anticipated growth areas. The result of this task will be a memorandum identifying relevant best practices and their potential application in Yorkville. The memorandum will include; a summary of issues identified through workshops conducted in Steps 1a-1d, a summary of the assessment of the current code conducted in Step 2a, and a conceptual approach to the new code that will address topics related to: • District regulatory metrics and thresholds • Structure and navigability of the code document • The integration of tables, graphics and other tools to clarify regulations and standards • The use of references to other portions of the City’s municipal code • Administrative procedures and processes, permits and approvals 2c: Form-based Code Applicability Analysis – Evaluation of Neighborhoods, Corridors, Districts The United City of Yorkville is currently preparing a Downtown Overlay District with form-based regulations for Downtown Yorkville. This task will entail the evaluation and analysis of how applicable a form-based zoning approach may be to other areas of the City, such as commercial areas, corridors, residential areas and neighborhoods. It will consider the existing character of various residential and commercial areas, the vision as articulated in the Comprehensive Plan, and other factors that may impact the viability of form-based regulations and their implementation. In any case, this step will result in specific recommendations regarding the applicability and implementation of form-based regulations that will be highlighted in dialogue with the PC as a part of Step 2e. 2d: City Staff Working Session We will conduct a working session with City staff to 1) review input and findings resulting from various workshops, staff comments and direction, the technical analysis of the existing code, and the legal review of the code, and 2) comprehensively review the existing code and identify an overall direction and outline to present to the PC. 2e: PC Meeting This step entails a summary presentation to the PC of the input received and issues identified in preceding steps. A preliminary approach will be also discussed, and the PC will be invited to provide feedback regarding the proposed conceptual direction of the new code, and its responsiveness to local issues discussed thus far. This meeting will also include a conversation regarding the recommendations developed as a part of step 2c pertaining to the applicability of further form-based regulations. 18 Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne Step 3: Draft District Standards and Concepts (existing Title 10: Ch. 3, 5 – 13) Step 3 includes the development of draft zoning language for all districts identified in the existing code. During this step, we anticipate regular contact with City staff to review incremental recommendations and technical language. The PC will be engaged at key points to provide input regarding general district regulations, then other regulations that complement the functionality and character of various districts. The creation of new districts and the elimination of some existing districts may be a part of this step. 3a: Draft Residential and Agricultural District Standards Preliminary Residential and Agricultural District Standards will be prepared for local consideration and discussion, based on community feedback, research and assessment, and community goals and objectives. This phase of the UDO process will focus on district issues and will be presented in an easy to use manner— enabling residents, builders, City officials, and staff to effectively implement the new regulations. This step will include use classifications and standards related to height, coverage, setback, and more. 3b: Draft Commercial and Industrial District Standards Preliminary Commercial and Industrial District Standards will be prepared, similar to Step 3a, however this phase of the UDO process will focus on the City’s non-residential areas. These draft standards are intended to respond to the needs of business owners in a manner that is balanced with other City objectives. Both the form and function of the City’s commercial and industrial areas will be effectively addressed with the new regulations, in a manner consistent with the priorities of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan. This step will include use classifications and standards related to height, coverage, setback, and more. 3c: Special District Standards (OS, PUD, Downtown Overlay) Preliminary District Standards will be prepared for special districts including Open Space, Planned Unit Development, Downtown Overlay districts, and any new overlays. We will work with City staff to carefully review these districts to identify specific problems or concerns that need to be addressed and then prepare standards that improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the special districts as tools to help the City implement its priorities and Comprehensive Plan recommendations. 3d. Proposed Zoning Districts Map Consistent with proposed zoning districts, an official zoning map will be prepared for consideration. The map could reflect new districts, boundary changes to existing districts, or the elimination of some districts. 3e: Staff Review Meeting This step will include a meeting or conference call with City staff to review the draft district regulations, and any proposed map changes. Appropriate modifications will be made prior to presentation to the PC. 3f: PC Meeting A meeting will be conducted with the PC to review and discuss the Draft district standards. Appropriate revisions will be made based on PC review and discussion. 19Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne Step 4: General Development Standards (existing Title 10: Ch. 14, 16 – 20, Landscaping, Stormwater Management, Appearance Codes) Step 4 includes the drafting of sections of the code related to “development standards of general applicability”. These will include the drafting of sections of the code and regulations that impact all districts, including regulations related to general site development standards, landscaping standards, use-specific regulations, parking design and capacity, and design and location standards. Each set of standards and regulations will include the creation of relevant graphics to illustrate regulatory concepts and standards. 4a: Preliminary Amendments for Parking, Landscaping, Development Standards, etc. Preliminary amendments for several “non-district” sections of the code will be prepared for local consideration and discussion. These will likely include but not be limited to parking, loading, landscaping, telecommunications infrastructure, alternative energy, definitions, and more. This step will also involve updates and revisions to the sign ordinance. 4b: Staff Review Meeting This task will include a meeting or conference call with City staff to review the draft standards for general development. Appropriate modifications will be made prior to presentation to the PC. Step 5: Draft Subdivision Design/Improvements (existing Title 11) Step 5 includes modifications to the subdivision code to ensure that it aligns with zoning regulations, the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, and the direction set forth for the new Unified Development Ordinance. 5a: Review of Subdivision Code for Compatibility and Best Practices This Step includes the review of the subdivision control ordinance to ensure that its procedures, requirements and standards align with the Comprehensive Plan and national best practices, as it relates to parks and infrastructure provisions, street and lot dimensions, review and permitting procedures, and approval and appeals, and more. 5b: Draft Modified Subdivision Design/Improvement Regulations This step includes the drafting of a modified subdivision code that reflects input from previous steps. 5c: Staff Review Meeting This step will include a meeting or conference call with City staff to review revisions to subdivision design/ improvement regulations prior to incorporation into the Unified Development Ordinance. Appropriate modifications will be made prior to presentation to the PC. 5d: PC Meeting A meeting will be conducted with City staff and the PC to review and discuss draft language developed as part of Steps 4 and 5. At this point in the process, the PC will be engaged to discuss the regulations guiding development in each district, supplemental regulations, and subdivision regulations applicable throughout the City. Appropriate revisions will be made based on PC review and discussion. 20 Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne Step 6: Administrative and Procedural Standards (existing Title 10: Ch. 1 – 2, 4, 15) Step 6 includes the drafting of sections of the code related to administrative processes and support materials. This section will seek to maximize the efficiency of zoning review so that development quality in Yorkville can be improved and permitted, including updates to non-conformity regulations, and procedural requirements for applicants, review standards, and processes for various zoning adjustments (variations, amendments, special uses, and more). This step also includes the drafting of definitions that will support regulatory concepts and minimize the likelihood of inconsistent interpretation of regulations. Additionally, any relevant graphics will be created to illustrate procedural steps or concepts that could otherwise be subject to interpretation. 6a: Draft Administrative, Applications, Approval, and Procedures This step will result in recommendations for application and approval procedures. It will also include flow charts and diagrams clearly articulating such procedures in order to ensure that applicants and code administrators understand who is responsible for various recommendations or approvals. 6b: Staff Review Meeting This step will include a meeting or conference call with City staff to review the draft administrative and procedural standards. Appropriate modifications will be made prior to presentation to the PC. 6c: PC Meeting A meeting will be conducted with City staff and the PC to review and discuss draft language developed as part of Step 6, as it applies to processes and procedures. Appropriate revisions will be made based on PC review and discussion. Step 7: Draft and Final UDO Step 7 includes the delivery of the Draft Unified Development Ordinance, review and revisions to the Draft UDO, and presentation and adoption of the Final UDO. 7a: Draft UDO Ordinance The draft Unified Development Ordinance will be prepared for local consideration and discussion, based on feedback from previous steps in the planning process. 7b: Staff Review and Meeting A meeting or conference call will be conducted with City staff to review and discuss the Draft UDO. Appropriate revisions will be made based on staff review and discussion. A revised Draft UDO will be prepared for PC review and discussion. 7c: PC Meeting A meeting will be conducted with the PC to review and discuss the Draft Unified Development Ordinance. Appropriate revisions will be made based on PC feedback. 7d: Revised UDO & Final Legal Review Based on discussion and feedback from staff and the PC, the revised draft ordinance will be prepared for public hearing. At this time, the City Attorney will also conduct a final legal review to ensure that any modifications are in line with statutory requirements. 21Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne 7e: Public Hearing A Plan Commission public hearing will be conducted consider and recommend action on the draft Unified Development Ordinance. 7f: City Board Presentation and Adoption Following the public hearing and the recommendation of the PC, appropriate revisions will be made, and the Final Unified Development Ordinance will be presented to the City Board for adoption. Step 8: Web-Based “Smart Code” Integration Step 8 includes the creation of a web-based “smart code” version of the UDO with interactive, site specific zoning analysis capabilities. Houseal Lavigne proposes the use of the enCodePlus software for the United City of Yorkville. 8a: enCodePlus Houseal Lavigne will coordinate and facilitate the setup and launch of the enCodePlus software at the beginning of the UDO project. enCodePlus has a one-time license fee that is billed directly to the City of Yorkville. This license fee will occur during the project initiation phase to secure a project domain and provide Houseal Lavigne direct access to the enCodePlus maintenance module. Using the enCodePlus maintenance module, Houseal Lavigne will draft UDO text directly in the software as well as integrate pop- up definitions, dynamic tables, external references, inline illustrations, hyperlinks, search term statistics, auto- numbering, and GIS standard maps. The cost to launch enCodePlus and maintain access to the software throughout the duration of the UDO development process is a one-time fee of $1,875, billed directly to the City of Yorkville. 8b: Annual Software Tiers After the adoption of the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance, the City will need to determine the most appropriate tier of enCodePlus software that meets their needs. enCodePlus offers three yearly maintenance tiers, which have been outlined in Section 6: Fee Proposal. 8c: Optional Features The United City of Yorkville may also wish to include optional features such as embedded calculators or GIS interactive maps, the cost of which are also detailed in Section 6: Fee Proposal. These additional costs can include the build and launch portion of the feature as well as annual fees. Listed in Section 6 are a few of the features the United City of Yorkville should consider once the UDO has been adopted and launched using the enCodePlus software, including embedded calculators to build and launch buffer yard simulator, landscaping and screening, parking, loading, and ADA shared parking, signage, and site capacity/site yield, as well as GIS Interactive Map (Advanced or Premium) to allow land bank mapping, land use look up, Multiple Listing Service (MLS) lease / sale data, parcel buffer tool. SECTION 5 PROJECT SCHEDULE 22Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne 2019 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021 Jan Feb Mar 1 Step 1: Project Initiation and Outreach 1A Project Initiation – Staff Meeting & Review of Preliminarily Issues 1B Plan Commission Workshop 1C Residential Areas Zoning Workshop 1D Commercial and Industrial Areas Zoning Workshop 1E Subdivision Ordinance Focus Group 1F Project Website (optional) 1G map.social (Online Map-Based Engagement Platform)(optional) 2 Step 2: Technical Analysis & Best Practices 2A Assessment of Existing Land Use Regulations 2B “Best Practices” Research and Assessment 2C Form-based Code Applicability Analysis 2D City Staff Working Session 2E PC Meeting 3 Step 3: Draft District Standards and Concepts 3A Draft Residential and Agricultural District Standards 3B Draft Commercial and Industrial District Standards 3C Special District Standards (OS, PUD, Downtown Overlay) 3D Proposed Zoning Districts Map 3E Staff Review Meeting 3F PC Meeting 4 Step 4: General Development Standards 4A Preliminary Amendments for Parking, Landscaping, Development Standards 4B Staff Review Meeting 5 Step 5: Draft Subdivision Design/Improvements 5A Review of Subdivision Code for Compatibility and Best Practices 5B Draft Modified Subdivision Design/Improvement Regulations 5C Staff Review Meeting 5D PC Meeting 6 Step 6: Administrative & Procedural Standards 6A Draft Administrative, Applications, Approval, and Procedures 6B Staff Review Meeting 6C PC Meeting 7 Step 7: Draft & Final UDO 7A Draft UDO Ordinance 7B Staff Review and Meeting 7C PC Meeting 7D Revised UDO & Final Legal Review 7E Public Hearing 7F City Board Presentation and Adoption 8 Step 8: Web-based “Smart Code” Integration 8A enCodePlus Software Integration Percent of Total Workload Expended per Month 9%5%5%4%4%5%3%8%6%5%4%4%8%6%3%9%2%2%2%1%1%1%1%1%1% SECTION 5 PROJECT SCHEDULE Denotes meetings to be conducted by Project Team.Denotes events to be held by the Project Team.Denotes products to be delivered by the Project Team Legend for Diagram: Timeline The schedule below provides an overall 24-month framework to complete Houseal Lavigne’s approach for each step outlined in our Scope of Work, including the 6-month Adoption process outlined in the City’s RFP. As the City desires, this schedule anticipates a project “kick-off” in March of 2019 and completion in December of 2020. We are ready to begin work immediately and committed to devoting the proposed personnel and resources for the entire length of time necessary to complete the project. Adoption Period SECTION 6 FEE PROPOSAL 23Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne SECTION 6 FEE PROPOSAL The following table summarizes Houseal Lavigne’s proposed fee for the United City of Yorkville’s Unified Development Ordinance assignment. This fee totals $140,610 and reflects the services required to complete all tasks described in each step within the Methodology section of our firm’s proposal, including the delivery of a web-based “smart code” using the enCodePlus software. It should also be noted that we have built the initial licensing fee for enCodePlus, which totals $1,875, into our Project Budget, but this fee will be billed to the City directly from enCodePlus. In addition, yearly licensing fees, as well as one-time fees for optional features, exist for the City’s continued use of enCodePlus—beyond adoption. These yearly fees/optional features have been outlined below, but are not included in our total project budget. Throughout the project, we will work with City staff to identify opportunities to reduce direct costs in order to maximize resources and will assist the City in its decision making regarding what yearly fee/optional features of enCodePlus best meet the City’s needs. The fee proposal also includes anticipated costs for direct expenses related to travel, document production, data-sources, and other reasonable expenses necessary to complete the Scope of Work. Fee Proposal Houseal Lavigne Total Principal PM Associate $205 $120 $110 Step 1: Project Initiation and Outreach Step 1: Total Hours 20 25 20 65 Step 1: Total Professional Fees $4,100 $3,000 $2,200 $9,420 Step 2: Technical Analysis and Best Practices Task 2: Total Hours 25 75 60 160 Task 2: Total Professional Fees $5,125 $9,000 $6,600 $21,750 Step 3: Draft District Standards and Concepts Task 3: Total Hours 20 75 70 165 Task 3: Total Professional Fees $4,100 $9,000 $7,700 $21,210 Step 4: General Development Standards Task 4: Total Hours 20 75 65 160 Task 4: Total Professional Fees $4,100 $9,000 $7,150 $19,890 Step 5: Draft Subdivision Standards Task 5: Total Hours 16 75 55 158 Task 5: Total Professional Fees $3,280 $9,000 $6,050 $19,890 Step 6: Administrative Procedural Standards Step 6: Total Hours 16 75 55 146 Step 6: Total Professional Fees $3,280 $9,000 $6,050 $19,890 Step 7: Draft and Final UDO Step 7: Total Hours 30 80 75 185 Step 7: Total Professional Fees $6,150 $9,600 $8,250 $24,000 Step 8: Web-based “Smart Code” Implementation enCodePlus Initial Licensing Fee ------$1,875 Project Totals, Excluding Yearly enCodePlus Fees Total Project Hours 1,037 Total Project Professional Fees (steps 1-7)$131,735 enCodePlus Initial Licensing Fee (step 8)$1,875 Direct Expenses $7,000 TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET $140,610 Hourly Rates of Key Staff Houseal Lavigne Hourly Rate John Houseal $205 Nik Davis $185 Carly Petersen $120 Jackie Wells $110 Trisha Stevens $110 Yearly enCodePlus Fee/Optional Features (after adoption) Total enCodePlus Yearly Maintenance Fees Standard 90 $4,250 Advanced 180 $5,250 Premium 360 $7,250 Total enCodePlus Optional Features Embedded Calculator (no annual fee)$2,500 GIS Interactive Map (Advanced) Build and Launch $4,500 Plus Annual Fee $3,500 GIS Interactive Map (Premium) Build and Launch $6,500 Plus Annual Fee $4,550 SECTION 7 APPENDIXES IUnified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne REFERENCES Main ColfaxEmpire Britain P i p e s t o n e Klock OgdenBroadwayUnionColumbusOak Lake Graham Market May Emery Wall RiverviewTerritorial Highland 8thPearl11thHullCross WeldShore SuperiorBishopMonroeHurd2ndLavetteHigh MiltonBuss ClayClay Catalpa JenningsPaw PawPavoneSalemFair9th6th5thMiller Ri v e r WaterParker Searles Bond JohnOdenThresher McallisterBuenaGreen 4th12th BairdMorton Mcguigan Niles Gray Division Enterprise V a l l e y MarionRobbins Wauceda Bru n s o n Hastings PitkinSeeleyWall Harrison StevensBentonHeckKline Cherry Maple Riversi de SchulzNowlenLincoln Bellview Sum m i t Apple Edwards Park Red Arro w Foster WarwickWinans Crystal Riford PackardEdgecumbe 10thCollegePasade n a Garfield Washington Frank Boughton Mineral Nathaniel Wells Senior HannahMadison Winans8thPark Hig h Kirby MccordLasalle FairRed Arro w 9thRiverCass AgardSingle Family Residential - Detached Single Family Residential - Attached Multi-Family Residential Commercial Office Schools / Religious Institutions Public / Semi-Public / Utilities Healthcare Parks / Open Space Golf Course Industrial Airport Vacant Land Use Legend Lake Michigan St. Joe RiverP a w Paw Rive r Redeveloped multi-family buildings should be well buffered and separated from adjacent single family homes The potential exists to realign Maple Avenue, improving circulation through the area and eliminating a railroad crossing Larger and exaggerated setbacks would improve pedestrian comfort on Fairview Avenue Parking in the rear of commercial buildings would improve the area’s walkability and character. Existing street grid should carry through to the development on the north side of 2nd Street Existing parking area may be too narrow to accommo- date any development. Consideration should be given to utilizing this area as open space or for stormwater management Fairview TOD Redevelopment Concept 4 5 8 76 2 1 3 34 Village of Downers Grove Downtown Pattern Book Blo Ck analYsis of DoWntoWn DoWners GroVe An analysis of different blocks and areas of Downtown are presented below. This is preceded by a block by block, building by building overview and assessment . The surface parking lots on both sides of the tracks, includ- ing the large parking areas for the library and the bank and its parking lots, along with the residential conversions offer few of the core ingredients of a traditional downtown. The 1100 block of Warren Avenue is far removed from the Downtown “core” and is best described as a transition area. The orientation of the Community Bank of Downers Grove suggests that the Downtown does not extend be- yond Forest. This is further reinforced by its large parking area and drive up banking which destroy the streetwall any connections to the commercial buildings to the west. This section of Main Street is comprised primarily of residentially scaled commercial buildings and residential conversions. The low building heights fail to provide any sense of enclosure, however streetscape enchantments and wide sidewalks provide pedestrian comfort. While the funeral home building at 4920 Main Street contributes to the character of the area, the fact that it is surrounded by surface parking is detrimental to the downtown charac- ter of the block. The White Hen Pantry building at 4946-4952 Main Street is set back from the property line and has parking in front of the building. This de- velopment pattern is typical of a commercial use along a corridor such as Ogden Avenue, but not typical or generally desirable in a downtown. The development setback pattern is detrimental to the streetwall and negatively impacts the pedestrian connections to the north and the overall character of this section of Main Street. This block of Forest Avenue lacks many of the core components of a traditional downtown. The setbacks of the single-family residential converted buildings mean a streetwall is absent. The setbacks and building heights also fail to provide any sense of enclosure. The new residential building at 4929 Forest contributes only mod- erately to the downtown pattern of this block. With the exception of the backside of the Tivoli, this block is best described as a suburban residential street. Recent development within this area of the Downtown provides almost all of the essential components of a downtown. The building heights provide a sense of enclosure. Streetscape improvements provide a sense of comfort. The mix of uses adds life to the area. Architectural details provide visual interest and a pedestrian scale. The character and feel of this block is significantly enhanced by the presence of the Tivoli Theatre and Station Crossing. The majestic Tivoli with its ornate details provides a unique character to the area, and the plazas and seating areas along with the mix of uses provide enough interest to overcome the void created by the railroad tracks and lack of built form on the south side. With the exception of the historic smith building at the intersection of Maple and Main, this block contributes nothing to the downtown character. The primary land use in this block is surface parking and the uses rein- force an automobile orientation. The low one-story buildings in this part of Main Street along with the surface parking lots fail to provide any sense of comfort and enclosure to the pedestrians, resulting in a feeling of isolation from other parts of Downtown. The surface parking lots also “kill” the streetwall and significantly impact a pedestrians desire to travel north towards Maple. Even though a cemetery occupies a large segment of this block, this section of Main Street is one of the best block segments in Downtown. The masonry wall maintains visual interest along the west side of the street and keeps the streetwall intact. A pedestrian arcade connects the parking garage with Main Street and provides areas for outdoor dining. Emmetts, Ballydoyles and the Downers Grove National Bank are all noteworthy buildings that contribute to Downtown in terms of their use and architecture. The civic uses along this block of Curtiss Street provide an atmosphere and character not present elsewhere in Downtown. Unfortunately the buildings located along Main Street do a poor job of “turning” the corner and connecting this block of Curtiss. This block is further removed from Main Street due to the drive-up banking area of the Downers Grove National Bank. This area of downtown exhibits most of the ingredients of a traditional downtown. With the exception of the US Bank drive-up banking facility the street wall is maintained throughout the entire block. Wide sidewalks, street furniture, pedestrian scale lighting and outdoor dining areas provide a sense of comfort. A mid-block crosswalk is well defined and adds to the pedestrian friendliness of the area. Buildings also contribute, with their architectural details and storefront windows. The low rise buildings however fail to provide a sense of enclosure. At Houseal Lavigne , we are proud of our work and the long-term relationships we maintain with clients. We believe each of these references demonstrate our ability to satisfy clients through an approach that meets the technical and financial needs of client communities. Project Client Contact Name Phone Email Zoning Ordinance City of Flint, Michigan Kevin Schronce, Former City Planner (269) 720-6264 kschronce@gmail.com UDO City of Bloomington, Illinois Katie Simpson, City Planner (309) 434-2341 ksimpson@cityblm.org Downtown Regulatory Strategy Village of Downers Grove, Illinois Stan Popovich, Community Development Director (630) 434-6893 spopovich@downers.us Downtown Neighborhood Zoning City of Bentonville, Arkansas Shelli Kerr, Planning Services Manager (479) 271-3107 skerr@bentonvillear.com Zoning Ordinance City of Marion, Iowa Tom Treharne, Community Development Director (319) 743-6320 ttreharne@cityofmarion.org II Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne John A. Houseal, FAICP Principal-in-Charge|Co-Founder John is a Principal and Co-founder of Houseal Lavigne and has established himself as one of the region’s top urban planning professionals. John’s reputation and expertise within the profession as a leader in urban planning, contemporary development practices, and community outreach has garnered him wide recognition and numerous planning awards. John has been a featured speaker at national, regional, state, and local events and conferences for issues related to urban planning, zon- ing, transportation, context sensitive design, and the environment. John is recognized as one of the top community facilitators, consensus builders, and citizen participation experts in the region. John maintains professional memberships with Lambda Alpha International, American Planning Asso- ciation, the American Institute of Certified Planners, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and Urban Land Institute. John received a Bachelor of Science in environmental sciences from University of Michigan and a Master of Environmental Planning for environmental and urban planning from Ari- zona State University. John is also an AICP inducted Fellow and certification instructor and has been responsible for preparing planners for professional certification since 2005. Prior to co-founding Houseal Lavigne, John was a Principal and the Director of Urban Planning for URS Corporation, a global multi-disciplinary engineering firm based in San Francisco, California. Working from the Michigan Avenue office in Downtown Chicago, John oversaw and directed the firm’s urban planning and community development projects, often coordinating on assignments throughout the country. Prior to being the Director of Urban Planning for URS Corporation, John was a Principal with Trkla, Pettigrew, Allen and Payne (TPAP), a prominent planning and economic development firm in Chicago. While a Principal at TPAP, John directed a wide range of urban planning and community development assignments throughout the Midwest. From revitalization plans for Chicago’s south side neighborhoods to regional highway corridor studies, John has directed, managed, and assisted with a wide range of planning assignments. John has di- rected a number planning and development related assignments in several states, including compre- hensive plans, corridor plans, downtown plans, neighborhood plans, master development/site plans, and more. John has also directed the zoning updates and amendments, as well as the creation of entirely new zoning ordinances, sign ordinances, planned unit development ordinances, overlay dis- tricts, and design and development guidelines. Several unique and very significant assignments have been directed by John and provided significant momentum in his career, including the IDOT SWS Tools for Balanced Growth Study, which was the State of Illinois’ first balance growth initiative; the Cap the Ike Study, which was a study examining the creation of “new land” by capping the Eisenhower Expressway for approximately 1.5 miles; and an FAA funded study to examine land use compatibility and the O’Hare Modernization Project (OMP). As project director, John’s leadership skills and planning and design expertise were pivotal to the suc- cess of these, and many other assignments. John has received several professional planning awards and distinctions, including an ILAPA Gold Award for Planning; an ILAPA Silver Award for Plan Implementation; an ILAPA Award for Planning Education; ILAPA Awards for Strategic Planning; the DePaul University Chaddick Institute Develop- ment Award; the Greater OBCC Commercial Revitalization Award, APA National Excellence Award, and induction into Lambda Alpha International, an international honorary fraternity for professional excellence in the field of land economics. Education Bachelor of Environmental Sciences University of Michigan Master of Environmental Planning Arizona State University Memberships American Planning Association American Institute of Certified Planners inducted Fellow Lambda Alpha International OPRF Community Foundation Board of Directors Awards 2017 APA-IL Outreach Award Envision Oak Park Comprehensive Plan 2014 APA National Award for Excellence Emerging Planning and Design Firm 2014 APA-MI Public Outreach Award Imagine Flint Master Plan 2014 APA-IA Daniel Burnham Award Coralville Community Plan 2012 APA-IL Daniel Burnham Award Downers Grove Comprehensive Plan 2010 APA-IL Strategic Plan Award River Forest Corridors Plan 2009 APA-IL Implementation Award Ogden Avenue Enhancement Initiative 2007 APA-IL Daniel Burnham Award Carpentersville Comprehensive Plan 2007 APA-IL Implementation Award Palos Park Strategic Plan DePaul University’s Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development Award 2012 Oak Brook Commercial Areas Plan 2008 Algonquin Downtown Plan Commercial Revitalization Award Oak Brook Commercial Areas Plan Greater OBCC 2009 AICP Certification Instructor APA National and APA State Chapters 2005 to present IIIUnified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne John A. Houseal, FAICP Project Experience Zoning & Design Guidelines 30 Zoning & Design Guidelines Assignments, including: • Benton Harbor, MI • Bloomington, IL • Brookfield, IL • Carpentersville, IL • Cary, IL • Chicago, IL • Dunwoody, GA • Fairview Heights, IL • Flint, MI • Geneva, IL • Harwood Heights, IL • Hinsdale, IL • Kenilworth, IL • Marion, IA • McHenry, IL • Melrose Park, IL • Montgomery, IL • Muskogee, OK • Murray, KY • Northbrook, IL • Oak Brook, IL • Oakbrook Terrace, IL • Pace TOD Guidelines Manual • Palos Park, IL • Palos Heights, IL • Prairie Grove, IL • Richton Park, IL • River Forest, IL • Wilmette, IL Strategic Planning • Fond du Lac, WI • Morton Grove, IL • Palos Park, IL • Warrenville, IL • West Chicago, IL Retainer Services • Brookfield, IL • Davis Junction, IL • Forest Park, IL • Harwood Heights, IL • Kenilworth, IL • Lockport, IL • Melrose Park, IL • Montgomery, IL • Oakbrook Terrace, IL • Palos Park, IL • Prairie Grove, IL • River Forest, IL • Round Lake, IL • Winnetka, IL Comprehensive Plans 60+ Comprehensive Plans including: • Benton Harbor, MI • Brookfield, IL • Brownsburg, IN • Byron, IL • Carpentersville, IL • Coralville, IA • Council Bluffs, IA • Countryside, IL • Davis Junction, IL • Downers Grove, IL • Edinburgh, IN • Evergreen Park, IL • Fairview Heights, IL • Flint, MI • Frederick, CO • Forest Park, IL • Geneva, IL • Glen Ellyn, IL • Greater Bridgeport Region, CT • Hammond, IN • Harwood Heights, IL • Homer Glen, IL • Jackson, MO • Jackson, TN • Kenilworth, IL • Lynwood, IL • Lansing, MI • Marion, IA • Mattoon, IL • Maywood, IL • Melrose Park, IL • Montgomery, IL • Morton Grove, IL • Mundelein, IL • Niles, IL • Oakbrook Terrace, IL • Oak Park, IL • Palos Heights, IL • Palos Park, IL • Pleasant Hill, IA • Prairie Grove, IL • River Forest, IL • St. Charles, IL • St. Cloud, MN • Sugar Grove, IL • Tipton, IN • Tipton County, IN • Westmont, IL • Whiting, IN • Windsor, CO Downtown Planning 30+ Downtown Plans including: • Algonquin, IL Downtown Plan • Downers Grove, IL Downtown • Forest Park, IL Madison Street Corridor • Geneva, IL Downtown Master Plan • Huntly, IL Downtown Master Plan • McHenry, IL Downtown Plan • Melrose Park, IL Historic Broadway Avenue District Plan • Morton, IL Downtown Master Plan • Murray, KY Main Street Plan • Round Lake, IL Downtown Plan • Oshkosh, WI Downtown Plan • Winfield, IL Downtown/TOD Plan Special Area Planning 50+ Special Area Plans, including: • Bellwood TOD master Development Plan • Bellwood St. Charles Road Corridor/TOD Plan • Countryside Dansher Industrial Park Subarea Plan • Glenview The Glen Parcel 24 Master Plan • Island Lake Commercial Areas Master Plan • Marengo TOD & Western Corridor Planning Area • Melrose Park Rose trail Neighborhood Master Plan • Montgomery Preserve Subarea Master Plan • Naperville Martin Mitchell Campus Master Plan • Oak Brook Commercial Areas Master Plan • Oakbrook Terrace Unit 5 Area Master Plan • Palos Park Commercial Areas Master Plan • Prairie Grove River Front Vision • Rolling Meadows Golf Road Corridor Mobility Plan • South Chicago Heights Station Area Plan • Skokie Dempster Station Area Plan Corridor Planning 70+ Corridor Plans including: • Bellwood - Mannheim Road Corridor; 25th Avenue Corridor Plan • Brookfield - Ogden Ave. Corridor Plan; 47th Street Corridor Plan; 31st Street Corridor Plan • Carpentersville - IL Route 31 Corridor Plan; IL Route 25 Corridor Plan; Randall Road Corridor Plan • Countryside - LaGrange Road Corridor Plan; Joliet Road Corridor Plan; Road Corridor Plan • Davis Junction - IL Route 172 Corridor Plan • Hinsdale - Odgen Avenue Corridor Plan • IL 47 Corridor Study • Kenilworth - Green Bay Road Corridor Plan • Lockport - I-355 Corridor Master Plan • Melrose Park - Lake Street Corridor Plan; Broadway Avenue Corridor Plan; North Avenue Corridor Plan • Melrose Park Broadway Avenue Corridor Plan • Montgomery - Montgomery Road Corridor Plan; Blackberry Creek Corridor Plan • Naperville - Ogden Avenue Enhancement Study • Oak Brook - 22nd Street Corridor Plan • Palos Heights - Harlem Avenue Corridor Plan • Portage, IN - Highway 20 Corridor Plan • River Forest Corridors Plan- Madison Street Corridor Plan; North Avenue Corridor Plan; Lake Street Corridor Plan; Harlem Avenue Corridor Plan • Traverse City, MI- Eight Street Corridor Plan; East Front Street Corridor Plan West Front Street Corridor Plan Garfleld Avenue Corridor Plan 14th Street Corridor Plan IV Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne Nik brings more than 10 years of professional design and planning experience to Houseal Lavigne Associates and as a Principal manages much of the firm’s versatile studio work, as well as hones skill specializations in urban design, landscape architecture, site plan development, streetscape design, and sustainability planning, from the individual lot level up to the regional scale. He provides the connection between the planmaking process and document creation, focusing on concept and site design, graphics, document layout, geographic information and cartographic renderings, and urban- form 3D modeling, using a breadth of software tools and drafting techniques. Nik has extensive experience in landscape and planting design which includes conducting site visits and creating inventory and analysis maps, developing project bases, drafting general development and preliminary plans, producing hand and computer rendered sketches and plans, and submitting construction documents, specifications, plant list schedules, and cost estimates for review and instal- lation. Nik has a diverse background in urban planning and design with experience in the preparation of research and inventory materials, site analysis maps, framework plans, preparation of conceptual development plans for a full range of residential, commercial, mixed-use, office and industrial park developments, and commercial corridors. Prior to joining Houseal Lavigne Associates, Nik worked for consulting firms specializing in landscape architecture, streetscape design, urban design, zoning, and development planning. Nik has a Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture from Purdue University. He is a member of the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA), and some of his past work has been awarded recognition in sustain- ability and environmental stewardship. Nik Davis Principal Education Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture, Purdue University Memberships American Society of Landscape Architects ASLA Positions ILASLA Allied Professionals Liaison ILASLA Legacy Project Co-Chair Past ILASLA Public Awareness Chair Past ILASLA External Communications Officer APA-IL Positions Co-Chair for the Marketing Committee Presentations 2015 National APA Planning Conference New Tools for Zoning & Development Visualization 2013 National APA Planning Conference Putting Zoning on the Map APA-CMS January, 2012 Integrating Sustainability Into Development Regulations October 2011, APA-IL State Conference Awards 2018 APA-VA Plan of the Year Bristol Virginia Comprehensive Plan 2018 Special Acheivement in GIS Award Oshkosh Lakeshore Development 2017 APA-IL Outreach Award Envision Oak Park Comprehensive Plan 2016 APA-MN Innovation Award St. Cloud Comprehensive Plan 2014 APA-MI Public Outreach Award Imagine Flint Master Plan 2009 ILASLA Honor Award for Environmental Stewardship Winnebago County 2030 Land Resource Management Plan Project Experience Zoning/Form-Based Codes • Baltimore, MD* • Bentonville, AR • Buffalo, NY* • Cleveland Heights, OH* • Council Bluffs, IA* • Dunwoody, GA • Flint, MI • Fort Dodge, IA* • Mundelein, IL* • Muskogee, OK • New Orleans, LA* • Park Ridge, IL* • Riverside, IL* • Wilmette, IL* • Winnebago County, IL* Design Guidelines & Standards • Chicago - Archer & Halsted • Council Bluffs, IA* • Fort Dodge, IA* • Kenilworth, IL • Mundelein, IL* • Pace TOD Guidelines Manual , IL* Comprehensive Plans • Aurora, CO • Bentonville, AR • Bristol, TN • Buffalo, NY* • Cary, IL • Council Bluffs, IA • Elgin, IL • Flint Master Plan, MI • Frederick, CO • Hudson, OH • Maywood, IL • St. Charles, IL • St. Cloud, MN • Windsor, CO Downtown/TOD Plans • Carbondale, IL • Carson City, NV • Elmhurst, IL • Fort Dodge, IA • Geneva, IL • Hopkinsville, KY • Hudson, OH • Rolling Meadows, IL Corridors • Ames, IA • Bentonville, AR • Des Plaines, IL* • Elmhurst, IL • Island Lake, IL • Homer Glen, IL • Kenilworth, IL • New Lenox, IL • Park Ridge, IL* • Peoria Heights, IL • Portage, IN • Rolling Meadows, IL • Traverse City, MI Streetscape Designs • Bourbonnais, IL* • Bradely, IL Broadway Street • Chicago - 87th & Stony, Lake Street, Uptown- Broadway Avenue, Auburn Gresham-79th Street • Des Plaines, IL* • Elmhurst - North York • Glen Ellyn, IL • Grayslake, IL* • Huntley, IL • New Buffalo, MI • Richton Park, IL* * Work conducted at another firm. VUnified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne As a certified planner with the American Institute of Certified Planners, Carly brings a diverse background, including thirteen years of public-service centered on economic development, zoning, and planning. Carly is guided by an avid interest in the fields of urban planning, planning theory, geography, and land use, as well as her professional goal to develop plans and ordinances that provide viable, implementable, and user-friendly assets and strategies to the communities in which she works. Her project strengths are derived from two distinct viewpoints; (1) from experience contributing to comprehensive, downtown, special area, and transportation plans for public use and (2) from administering ordinances as a community planner. Her specialization is in functional planning, building an understanding of community context, and translating that information into clear, workable plans, tools, and ordinances. To fulfill client’s goals, Carly focuses on the connection between place and desired results to deliver objective and balanced solutions. Prior to her position with Houseal Lavigne, Carly began her career at the New York City Economic Develop- ment Corporation (NYCEDC), specializing in the use of planning technology in land development projects. At NYCEDC, Carly assisted internal departments and City agencies as an urban planner and technician, providing support in GIS, spatial and 3d technology to public projects, plans, and strategies. When Hurricane Sandy made impact in 2012, she led an important effort to contribute to the City’s resiliency plan. As a result of that experience, Carly has seen first-hand the effects community resolve can have during a project, and the impact that public involvement can make in the planning process. In 2013, Carly and her family relocated to Bloomington, Indiana—the home of Indiana University. As senior planner for Monroe County, she provided oversight, evaluation and project coordination on development projects, zoning requests, and subdivision petitions. She has represented and reported on public petitions to various government committees and boards and is skilled at relating ordinance requirements clearly and effectively. Project Experience PlaNYC, A Greener, Greater New York—New York, NY Contributed research and design content to the 2007 landmark plan for a more sustainable New York City. A Stronger, More Resilient New York—New York, NY Led a support team for the NYC Special Initiative for Rebuilding and Resiliency, post-Hurricane Sandy. Provided content for a responsive resiliency plan effort issued in 2011. Essex Crossing Development (Seward Park) RFP—New York, NY Designed the preliminary site plan for a public RFP for 1.65 million square feet of mixed-use prime real estate in Manhattan, which is presently under development. Property Info—New York, NY Project Manager for NYCEDC web map portal, designing web application system requirements. Urbanizing Area Plan—Monroe County, IN Provided support and assistance to this 2015 amendment to the community’s Comprehensive Plan. Urbanizing Area Plan Implementation Report—Monroe County, IN Contributed to 2016 zoning calibration framework based on comprehensive plan amendment, including drafting conceptual zone maps and a development type-based “hybrid” zoning model. Rural Zoning Framework—Monroe County, IN Completed a rural zoning guidance document in 2017, including conceptual zone map for rural areas. Transportation Alternatives Plan—Monroe County, IN Completed an update of the local transportation alternatives plan, adopted in early 2018. Consolidated Development Ordinance—Monroe County, IN Contributed to the drafting of a consolidated development ordinance (zoning and subdivision control), slated for adoption in 2019. Carly Petersen, AICP Associate II Education Master of Planning, Dalhousie University Bachelor of Arts in Geography (Urban Systems), McGill University Certificate, Project Management, New York University Certificate, Building Information Modeling, New York University Memberships American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, National American Planning Association, IN Awards NYC Economic Development Corporation President’s Award Winner NYC Broadband Development VI Unified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne Jackie is an Associate at Houseal Lavigne. Her time as a consultant has focused on working with municipalities to review, revise, and update their zoning, sign, and subdivision ordinances. Her zoning work is informed by her prior experience working as a planner for a small municipality in Virginia where she gained an understanding of the administrative and enforcement issues communities face. She is focused on the development of responsive and detailed zoning recommendations which meet the specific and unique needs of each community. In addition to zoning projects, Jackie has contrib- uted to the outreach, research, and development of several comprehensive, downtown, and strategic plans. She believes that her experience with both zoning and planning allows her to develop better informed policy recommendations and more responsive zoning regulations. Prior to joining Houseal Lavigne, Jackie was the Housing and Development Planning Specialist for Danville, Virginia, a community of approximately 45,000. There, Jackie was responsible for: develop- ing, implementing, and monitoring the City’s five-year Consolidated Plan and Annual Plans, applying for and administering local, state, and federal grant funding, acting as a liaison between the City and neighborhood and non-profit groups, spearheading the City’s targeted efforts in the Schoolfield and Edgewood neighborhoods, and planning and managing community engagement campaigns and events. In this capacity, she gained valuable experience in developing programs and policies, applying for and administering local, state, and federal grants, engaging community groups, and supporting the establishment of new neighborhood associations. Jackie uses her experience in local government to develop data-driven solutions that manage the needs of elected and appointed officials, department heads, non-profit partners, and residents of the community. She instills detail into all of her projects and is passionate about the communities in which she works. Project Experience Cary, IL - Unified Development Ordinance Assisted with the update and development of the Village of Cary Unified Development Ordinance including adding and consolidating districts based on nonconformities analysis, updating parking and landscaping standards, updating subdivision regulations to support the development of walkable neighborhoods, and rewriting the sign ordinance to comply with Reed vs. the Town of Gilbert. Ardmore, OK - Unified Development Code Assisted with the update and development of a new Unified Development Code to reflect and support the recommendations of the recently adopted Ardmore Comprehensive and Subarea Plans. Jackson, TN - Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Assisted with the update and development of a new Zoning Ordinance to reflect and support the recommendations of the recently adopted One Jackson Civic Master Plan. Sunset Hills, MO - Zoning Ordinance Assisted with the update and development of a new Zoning Ordinance to reflect and support the recommendations of the recently adopted Sunset Hills Comprehensive and Subarea Plans, which was also prepared by Houseal Lavigne. Bloomington, IL - Zoning Ordinance Assisted with the update and development of the Bloomington Zoning Ordinance including assisting staff successfully navigate the public engagement and hearing necessary for the active rezoning of nearly 500 parcels. Eden Prairie, MN - Comprehensive Plan Supported the development of the comprehensive plan for Eden Prairie, a Twin Cities metropolitan community of more than 60,000, through research and application of best practices. Greenwich, CT - Comprehensive Plan Assisted in the development of the Town of Greenwich’s Plan of Conservation and Development through community engagement, reconnaissance, mapping, and research and best practices. Jackie Wells Associate Education Master of Urban Planning, University of Kansas Bachelor of Arts in Architecture, University of Kansas Memberships American Planning Association, VA American Planning Association, National Rotary International Presentations APA Quad State Conference: Economic Argument for Flexible Parking Requirements VIIUnified Development Ordinance• Unified City of YorkvilleHouseal Lavigne Trisha joined Houseal Lavigne in 2016. Her primary focus is creating exciting and innovative graphics to compliment Houseal Lavigne’s plans through illustrative maps, 3D visualizations, and plan docu- ment layouts. Though she largely concentrates on the graphic representation of planning policies, she is interested on all aspects of the planning process. Trisha received a Bachelor of Science in Architecture from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Cham- paign and a Master’s in Urban Planning and Policy from the University of Illinois at Chicago, concen- trating in spatial planning and urban design. While attending the University, she was awarded the AICP Outstanding Student Award honoring her exceptional achievements in the study of planning. During her graduate studies, Trisha worked for the City of Highland Park. Throughout her time with the City, she worked on projects such as the Highland Park Downtown Design Guidelines and the Cultural Arts Master Plan. Project Experience Cary, IL—Unified Development Ordinance Assisted with the update and development of the Village of Cary Unified Development Ordinance including adding and consolidating districts based on nonconformities analysis, updating parking and landscaping standards, and updating subdivision regulations to support the development of walkable neighborhoods. Bloomington, IL—Zoning Ordinance Analyzed parcels within each district to determine the number and extent of nonconformity to help determine the need for the creation of new district or the consolidation of existing districts based on the nonconformities analysis, updating parking and landscaping standards, and updating subdivision regulations to support the development of walkable neighborhoods. Bentonville, AR—Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendment Created 3d visualizations of potential redevelopment sites within the various subareas. Tasks related to the Zoning Amendments including diagrams to help illustrator zoning regulations for Bentonville’s downtown districts. Roscoe, IL—Zoning Ordinance Create diagrams to help illustrator zoning regulations. Sunset Hills, MO—Zoning Ordinance Assisted with the update and development of a new Zoning Ordinance to reflect and support the recommendations of the recently adopted Sunset Hills Comprehensive and Subarea Plans, which was also prepared by Houseal Lavigne. Trisha identified non-conforming lots within each of the City’s residential zoning districts based on their square footage and helped to identified non-conforming lots based on their frontage use ArcGIS. Fort Lupton, CO—Comprehensive Plan Created a story map illustrating the existing condition of City of Fort Lutpon. The story map touched on topics such as existing land use, current zoning, transportation, public facilities, and parks, open space and environmental features. In addition, Trisha created the graphics illustrating the subarea recommendation and 3d visualization for potential site redevelopments. Elmhurst, IL—Subarea Plans Created plans, graphics, and 3d models use to illustrate planning recommendation and redevelop- ment concepts. Hastings, MN—Corridor Plan Generated text detailing the proposed plan and strategies to spur the economic revitalization of the Vermillion Street Corridor. The plan included the identification of opportunity sites to serve as cata- lysts for future investment and recommended development characteristics and public improvements. Trisha was also responsible for the creation of accompanying maps, graphics, and 3d visualizations. Trisha Stevens Associate Education Masters of Urban Planning and Policy with a Certificate in Geospatial Analysis & Visualization University of Illinois, Chicago Bachelor of Science in Architecture, University of Illinois, Champaign/Urbana Memberships American Planning Association Illinois Chapter American Planning Association National Chapter Congress for New Urbanism Awards 2016 AICP Outstanding Student Award UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560 630-553-8573 www.yorkville.il.us SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: DECEMBER 7, 2018 THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS I. INTRODUCTION A. COMMUNITY PROFILE B. PROJECT SUMMARY II. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS B. PROJECT OBJECTIVES C. DELIVERABLES D. PROJECT TIMELINE III. PROPOSAL EVALUATION A. REVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS B. SUBMISSION FORMAT C. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE IV. GENERAL INFORMATION A. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT B. SUBLETTING OF CONTRACT C. CHANGES IN SCOPE OF SERVICES & PERSONNEL D. RIGHT TO REJECT PROPOSALS AND WAIVE INFORMALITIES E. CONTACT INFORMATION F. PUBLIC INFORMATION G. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS H. DISCLAIMERS I. CLARIFICATION OF PROPOSALS J. AWARD K. PAYMENT L. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADDENDA M. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION N. INDEMNITY AGREEMENT AND LIABILITY INSURANCE CONTENTS United City of Yorkville, Illinois | Unified Development Ordinance Request for Proposal1 A. COMMUNITY PROFILE The Kendall County and Yorkville area was first settled around 1829-1832. During the years 1834-1836 the communities of Bristol (north of the Fox River) and Yorkville (south of the Fox River), were platted. These communities continued to grow as similar, but separate, entities for over 100 years with Bristol incorporating as a village in 1861 and Yorkville in 1873. The two communities merged as the United City of Yorkville, a non-home rule community with a mayor-council form of government, in 1957. For the next twenty (20) years, Yorkville maintained its rural community character with residential and a main street like commercial area south of the Fox River until the early 1970’s when a secondary hub of commercial and retail businesses developed in an area north of the river at the intersection of US 34 and IL 47. Then in 1990, the City of Yorkville’s municipal boundaries grew to include the Wrigley Corporation which opened its headquarters of the Amurol Confection Division just north of Route 47 and Cannonball Trail. The City would eventually expand to cover approximately 20 square miles and experience tremendous increase in population between the years 2000 and 2010, from 6,189 residents to 16,921 residents. Current population for Yorkville, per a recent 2017 Special Census, is 19,022 residents. With a construction rebound from the 2008 recession underway in Yorkville, commercial and residential development has boomed since 2013 with new construction permits averaging 120 per year for the past 5 years. While efforts have been made to update various sections of the City Code over the past decade, now is the time to modernize and consolidate all the City’s development ordinances into a single document to meet the needs of our growing community. INTRODUCTION United City of Yorkville, Illinois | Unified Development Ordinance Request for Proposal2 B. PROJECT SUMMARY In 2014 the City overhauled its Zoning Ordinance followed by an update to its Comprehensive Plan in 2016. Several goals and implementation strategies in the Comprehensive Plan recommended improving residential subdivision design and enhancing the physical appearance of the community through an update to certain codes and establishing quality design standards which encourages the protection and preservation of Yorkville’s environmental assets. Therefore, the United City of Yorkville is requesting proposals from qualified firms with considerable experience in land use planning, zoning, subdivision/site development and landscape architecture to modernize and consolidate the various existing City ordinances into a cohesive, single-reference, graphic-based document known as a Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The ordinances requested for review include the following documents: 1. Zoning Ordinance (originally adopted 1974, amended 2014) 2. Subdivision Control Ordinance and Standard Specification for Improvements (adopted 2004) 3. Landscape Ordinance (adopted 2009) 4. Appearance Code (adopted 2005) The City is currently preparing a Downtown Overlay District with streetscape master plan guidelines and Form Based Code regulations which will also be incorporated in the UDO. United City of Yorkville, Illinois | Unified Development Ordinance Request for Proposal3 SCOPE OF SERVICES A. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS Proposals will be considered only from qualified firms with a preference to firms that are based in Illinois. Each proposal will consist of a maximum of 25 pages (excluding appendices) and should include the following: Letter of Transmittal | Prepared on company letterhead identifying the name of the key contact, address, phone number and email address. Executive Summary | Succinct explanation of the Consultant’s interest in the project and why the firm is uniquely qualified for this project. Organizational Profile | Brief description of the firm’s structure and capabilities, length of time in business, and previous work experience. Proposed Project Team | Provide resumes of all personnel, including outside consultants that will be assigned to the project including specific experiences each team member will contribute to the project. Identify and define their individual roles. Previous Project Summaries | List including reference contact information, for a minimum of three (3) projects which are similar in scope to the project described also identifying key personnel who worked on each project listed. The City reserves the right to contact any references provided herein or otherwise obtained. Methodology | Explanation of general technical approaches and processes to be employed for executing the requirements of the Project Components provided herein, which includes a detailed outline of the proposed services. Project Schedule | The proposed amount of time presented in months and as a percentage of total workload. Indication of proposed milestones should also be included. The City reserves the right to negotiate work tasks and schedule prior to finalizing a contract with the selected firm. Project Fees | Provide a fee breakdown of the proposed fees of the research project, with appropriate explanatory detail justifying costs and calculations. Please submit hourly rates for each individual as well. Signature/Certification | Proposal must be signed by an official authorized to bind the offer and shall contain a statement that the proposal is a firm offer guaranteed for a ninety (90) day period from the submittal deadline. The proposal shall also provide the following information: name, title, address, telephone number and e-mail address of the person(s) with authority to contractually bind the company and also who may be contacted during the period of proposal evaluation for the purpose of clarifying submitted information. United City of Yorkville, Illinois | Unified Development Ordinance Request for Proposal4 B. PROJECT OBJECTIVES The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) should address or have the following components: Review and assess the land use regulations of the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Control Ordinance and Standard Specifications, Landscape Ordinance, Stormwater Management Ordinance, Appearance Code and all other relevant City Ordinances governing development. Identification of deficiencies and inconsistencies within these variance ordinances and propose recommendations prior to fully incorporating changes into the formal UDO draft document. Modernization of design standards, paying particular attention to areas related to: • Off-Street Parking – update the parking schedule with new contemporary concepts such as payment in lieu of parking, autonomous vehicle planning, designated vehicle charging stations, etc. • Green Infrastructure – integration of stormwater regulations for a spectrum of densities and incentivize best management practices. • Subdivision Control – utilization of engineering and planning best management practices for sustainable and smart growth development. • Landscape Ordinance and Park Development Standards • Sign Ordinance • Appearance Code Alignment of the UDO with the goals and action steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan Update 2016. Incorporate the Downtown Overlay District with streetscape master plan guidelines and Form Based Code regulations into the UDO. Use of innovative methods to cooperatively develop regulations with City staff and consultants throughout the development of the UDO. Integration of codes into a user-friendly format so that all development related regulations are consolidated into a single document and easily cross-referenced. EXCERPTS FROM DRAFT VERSION OF DOWNTOWN FORM BASED CODE United City of Yorkville, Illinois | Unified Development Ordinance Request for Proposal5 In addition to document format, the creation of an online web-based “smart code” version of the UDO with interactive site specific zoning analysis capabilities. Extensive use of graphics, illustrations, images, photographs, diagrams and tables for ease of use and reference. Clear and concise review criteria and guidelines. Creation of a simple, streamlined review process with flexibility to fast-track development proposals which exceed minimum design criteria. Public input documents, surveys, questionnaires, social media outreach and/or project website and overall community outreach. Presentation of the final draft of the Unified Development Ordinance at meetings and public hearings, which at a minimum may include two (2) Economic Development Committee meeting; two (2) Planning and Zoning Commission meetings; and one (1) City Council meeting. Recommendations for the managing and maintaining codification of the new Unified Development Ordinance following adoption. C. DELIVERABLES The Consultant will prepare exhibits for citizens and elected official review as part of scheduled public presentations and meetings. These exhibits shall illustrate all major changes, revisions or additions proposed as part of the Unified Development Ordinance. The Consultant will be responsible for reproduction of twenty-five (25) final plan documents in hardcopy form. The Consultant will be responsible for providing the draft and final documents in both electronic formats (Microsoft Word and Adobe PDF) allowing reproduction, revision, and web posting by City staff. The Consultant will format the document in 8½” x 11” (vertically oriented) format. All final graphics, illustrations, images, photographs, diagrams and tables shall be provided in JPEG, PNG, PDF and the source format used to create such illustrations will be provided to the City. Provide digital, web ready drafts of the UDO for easy posting on the City’s website, project website and other social media platform. An online digital “smart code” UDO version with interactive site specific zoning analysis capable of rendering calculations for zoning criteria such as minimum parking requirements for a proposed land use, maximum lot coverage, required setbacks and transition yards, and volumetric limits (FAR, height, etc) based upon ESRI® ArcGIS™ base layer data provided by the City. Produce final copies for approval and adoption by the City Council. D. PROJECT TIMELINE The overall timeline for the completion of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) is anticipated to be eighteen (18) months, not including the adoption process. The entire process from authorization, commencement, and approval of the UDO should be completed within 24 months. As a submittal requirement, the applicant will provide a project schedule showing key task target dates, including public meeting and hearings with estimated task duration. Variations from the City’s established timeline should be discussed in the RFP. United City of Yorkville, Illinois | Unified Development Ordinance Request for Proposal6 PROPOSAL EVALUATION A. REVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS Selection criteria are outlined below and will be used to evaluate proposals for invitation to interview/ presentation. This RFP does not commit the City to award a contract or to pay any costs incurred in the preparations or submission of proposals. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals received in response to this RFP. Selection of the successful proposal for interview/ presentation will be made based upon the following criteria: • Responsiveness and proposed approach to work scope and project needs. Although City has identified a general nature of services to be provided, the consultant is given leeway toward the approach to the methodology to provide the requested services. Innovative strategies and creativity are desired. • Demonstrated experience and technical competence in similar projects. • Past record of performance of the firm with respect to such factors as working relationship with sub-consultants or peer consultants on the same project, control of costs, quality of work, and ability to meet schedules. • Cost-effectiveness. • Capacity and capability of the firm/team to perform the work in question, including specialized services. • Quality of key personnel assigned: bios, qualifications. • Understanding of local conditions related to the completion of the services. B. SUBMISSION FORMAT • Interested firms/consultants should submit four (4) paper copies and one (1) digital copy (CD) of the proposal requirements by the deadline of December 7, 2018. • The hard copy proposals shall be submitted in a sealed envelope marked “REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE 2018,” addressed to: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 • Proposals submitted by fax or e-mail will not be accepted. All submittals shall be retained by the City and will not be returned. C. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE A prep-proposal conference is scheduled for Monday, November 19, 2018 beginning at 1:00 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. The purpose of the pre-proposal conference is to assist prospective consultants with questions related to the RFP scope of services and submittal requirements. Attendance at the pre-proposal conference is not mandatory. Attendees must register by Friday, November 16, 2018 to Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director via e-mail at knoble@yorkville.il.us If no firms register, the meeting will not be held. United City of Yorkville, Illinois | Unified Development Ordinance Request for Proposal7 GENERAL INFORMATION A. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT A Professional Service Contract is required. B. SUBLETTING OF CONTRACT The Consulting Firm will agree, after the contract is awarded, not to assign or sublet the whole or any part of the contract without the prior written consent of the City. C. CHANGES IN SCOPE OF SERVICES & PERSONNEL The Consulting Firm will agree that any change of scope in the work to be performed after the original contract has been signed shall be documented as a written change order, be accepted by all parties, and made a part of the original contract by addendum. The personnel identified in the proposal shall work on the project until completion. Any substitution of person- nel shall require the approval of the City in writing. Personnel changes shall only be considered for valid reasons, such as an employee leaving the firm, major illness or accident. Only persons determined by the City to be well qualified shall be approved. D. RIGHT TO REJECT PROPOSALS AND WAIVE INFORMALITIES The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive any non-material irregularities or information in any RFP, and to accept or reject any item or combination of items. E. CONTACT INFORMATION If you have any questions regarding this RFP, please contact Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director: Mail: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 E-Mail: knoble@yorkville.il.us United City of Yorkville, Illinois | Unified Development Ordinance Request for Proposal8 F. PUBLIC INFORMATION All material submitted are available for public inspection. Every proposer is hereby warned that no part of their proposal or any other material submitted may be marked as confidential information and that any material so designated by the proposer will be made public information by its inclusion in the proposal. G. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS All documents shall be completed as requested by the City. No claim for errors or omissions in the bidding will be considered. Should a bidder find during examination of specifications or other contract documents, discrepancies, omissions, ambiguities or conflict among contract documents or be in doubt as to their meaning, it is the responsibility of the bidder to notify the Purchasing Manager who will then issue the necessary clarifications to all prospective bidders by means of addenda. H. DISCLAIMERS Any Request for Qualifications issued may or may not result in an award contract. However, the City reserves the right to cancel any request, at any time, for any reason, and to reject all proposals. Receipt of RFP materials from the City or submission of a proposal to the City confers no rights upon the vendor nor obligates the City in any manner. The determination of whether any proposal submitted by a vendor does or does not conform to the conditions and specification of this Request for Qualifications is the responsibility of the City. Any contract resulting in an award from this Request for Qualifications is invalid until properly approved and executed by the City. The successful vendor must not commence any billable work until a valid contract is executed. A contract resulting from the Request for Qualifications shall not preclude the City from obtaining equipment or services from other vendors if the successful vendor for this RFP is unable to satisfy the project needs in an acceptable manner. I. CLARIFICATION OF PROPOSALS The City reserves the right to obtain clarification of any point in a firm’s proposal or to obtain additional information. Failure of a proposer to respond to such a request for additional information or clarification could result in rejection of the proposal. Firms may be asked to make oral presentations to more fully explain their proposal if requested by the City. These presentations would be held subsequent to the opening of the responses to provide an opportunity for the firm to clarify their proposal. The City would schedule a time and location for each oral presentation. J. AWARD The award of the contract, if it is awarded, will be to the firm who in the City’s opinion serves the best interest of the City. The United City of Yorkville reserves the right to reject any or all proposals and to waive minor informalities in any quotation in order to make this award. K. PAYMENT Payment will be made in accordance with the policies and procedures of the City Council of the United City of Yorkville. The City will make payment in approximately thirty (30) days following completion and acceptance of contract work. United City of Yorkville, Illinois | Unified Development Ordinance Request for Proposal9 L. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADDENDA Original signature of company official on an addendum document shall be construed as an acknowledgement of receipt of any and all addenda pertaining to any specific proposal. Identification of addenda by number should be noted on the proposal form, as provided. M. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION It is the policy of the United City of Yorkville that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, ancestry, disability, sexual orientation, or veterans’ status, be excluded from consideration for employment, denied employment with or be subject to discrimination of any kind by the City. N. INDEMNITY AGREEMENT AND LIABILITY INSURANCE To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, defend, save and hold the City, its trustees, officers, employees, agents, attorneys and lenders (collectively the “Indemnitees”) harmless from and against all loss and expense (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees and other costs and expenses) by reason of any liability or allegation of liability, against the Indemnitees, or any of them, for damages because of property damage or bodily injury, occupational sickness or disease, including death, resulting therefrom, while performing the work or while at the site where work under the Contract is being conducted or elsewhere, while engaged in the performance of Work under the Contract, however such injuries may be caused, whether attributable to a breach of statutory duty or administrative regulation or otherwise, and such injuries for which liability is imputed to the Indemnitees, or any of them, or damage or injury, directly or indirectly arising or alleged to arise out of the performance of or the failure to perform the work or the failure to protect the work or the site, or the condition of the work, the site, adjoining land or driveways, or streets or alleys used in connection with the performance of the work. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the defense and indemnity set forth in this section includes, subject only to the limitations contained in this section, all liabilities, damages, losses, claims, demands and actions on account of bodily injury, death or property loss to an Indemnitee or to any other person or entities, whether based upon, or claimed to be based upon, statutory, contractual, tort or other liability of any Indemnitee. In addition, such defense and indemnity shall include all liabilities, damages, losses, claims, demands and actions for defamation, false arrest, malicious prosecution or any other infringement or similar rights. The Contractor must provide a Certificate of Insurance. The Certificate of Insurance shall be provided by an insurance company with the rate of B+: VI or better in the current edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide. This Certificate of Insurance must be received and approved before commencement of operations. The Certificate must evidence the following coverage in at least the limits stipulated. The Contract must agree to maintain such insurance for the duration of the project or the term for which services will be rendered. Contractor shall be required to provide commercial general liability insurance policy that includes products, operations and completed operations (with no exclusion for sexual abuse or molestation). Limits should be at least: Bodily injury & property damage with an occurrence limit of $1,000,000: Personal & advertising injury limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence: General aggregate limit of $2,000,000 (other than products and completed operations): Products and completed operations aggregate limit of $2,000,000. The contractor’s policy shall be required to name the City as an additional insured. Such coverage will be provided on an occurrence basis and will be primary and shall not contribute in any way to any insurance or self- insured retention carried by the City. Such coverage shall contain a broad form contractual liability endorsement or similar wording within the policy form. United City of Yorkville, Illinois | Unified Development Ordinance Request for Proposal10 PROPOSAL SIGNATURE FORM The undersigned, as proposal responder, declares that he/she has carefully examined all the items of the Specifications and Instructions herein that he/she fully understands and accepts the requirements of the same, and he/she agrees to furnish the specified items and will accept, in full payment therefore, the amount specified below. Proposals shall include all fees required. Note: terms are firm for 90 days. TOTAL PRICE: __________________________________________________________ FIRM NAME: __________________________________________________________ DATE: __________________________________________________________ ADDRESS: __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ TELEPHONE: __________________________________________________________ SIGNATURE: __________________________________________________________ (Person executing response & official capacity) Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number New Business #10 Tracking Number EDC 2019-17 Kendall County Intergovernmental Agreement Renewal – Inspection Services Economic Development Committee - February 5, 2019 2/13/2018 Approval of Renewed Agreement Majority Approval Annual renewal of the Intergovernmental Agreement between the United City of Yorkville and Kendall County related to building & plumbing inspection services. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Summary In May 2013, the City approved Resolution 2013-13 which executed an intergovernmental agreement between the City of Yorkville and Kendall County for shared building inspection services, on an as need basis, for a term of three (3) years. And in 2014, the City approved an amendment to the agreement which added shared plumbing services via Resolution 2014-34 and a renewal to this agreement was approved in March 2016 via Resolution 2016-08 and Resolution 2017-15 in March 2017, each extending the reciprocal service for an additional year. Last year’s agreement renewal was approved via Res. 2018-05. Although the City now outsources some of its inspection services to B&F, staff feels this arrangement has worked very well for both the County and the City over the last several years. The following chart illustrates the number of reciprocal inspections conducted by each governmental entity for calendar years 2016, 2016 and 2018: 2016 2017 2018 Kendall County inspections conducted by City 148 23 40 City inspections conducted by Kendall County 58 11 0 Since the existing agreement is set to expire on February 27, 2018, the proposed attached draft agreement is intended to continue the existing shared services agreement for an additional year with an option to renew annually upon written agreement between the City and the County. Proposed Agreement The basic substance of the agreement offers substitute inspection services for the City of Yorkville and Kendall County should the Code Officials of the respective government agencies be on vacation or otherwise unavailable to conduct their normal duties. The agreement, which is on an as need basis, consists of the following services when requested: footing inspections; backfill inspections; foundation wall inspections; concrete slab inspections; rough framing inspections; rough electric inspections; underground electric inspections; electrical service inspections; insulation inspections; roofing inspections and final inspections. In addition to these services, the agreement also includes rough plumbing and final plumbing inspections but does not include plan review or permit approval of plumbing work. The current intergovernmental agreement also maintains a minimum employee insurance requirement of: (a) comprehensive general liability of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate; and (b) comprehensive excess liability insurance of $1,000,000 for each occurrence with a minimum $5,000,000 aggregate. Staff Comments/Recommendation Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Pete Ratos, Building Code Official Date: January 17, 2019 Subject: Renewed Kendall County Intergovernmental Agreement – Reciprocal Building Inspection and Plumbing Inspection Services Both Yorkville’s Building Department staff and Kendall County’s Building Department believes that this back up for inspection services is beneficial. Therefore, we support the extension of the agreement for an additional year. Kendall County’s Planning Building and Zoning Committee (PB&Z) will be reviewing this proposed amendment in within the next month, as well. Should you have any specific questions regarding the attached proposal; staff will be available at Tuesday night’s meeting. Page 1 of 10 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR RECIPROCAL BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES BETWEEN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS - 2019 THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (“the Agreement”) by and between the County of Kendall, a unit of local government of the State of Illinois (“Kendall County”) and the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”) a municipal corporation of the State of Illinois, is as follows: WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970, Article VII, Section 10, provides that units of local government may contract or otherwise associate among themselves to obtain or share services and to exercise, combine, or transfer any power or function in any manner not prohibited by law or by ordinance and may use their credit, revenues, and other resources to pay costs related to intergovernmental activities; and WHEREAS, the City and Kendall County are units of local government within the meaning of Article VII, Section 1 of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 who are authorized to enter into intergovernmental agreements pursuant to the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, 5 ILCS 220/1 et seq.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted by the Illinois Counties Code and Illinois Municipal Code (55 ILCS 5/1-1001, et seq. and 65 ILCS 5/1-1-1, et seq.), the County and City (collectively referred to as the “Parties”) are both authorized to perform inspections of buildings within their respective jurisdictions to promote the health and safety of the public; and WHEREAS, units of local government may establish agreements with other units of local government within the State of Illinois to enforce building codes pursuant to 20 ILCS 3105/10.09-1(f), which is commonly known as the Capital Development Board Act; and Page 2 of 10 WHEREAS, the County and City wish to share their resources and assist each other in the performance of inspections on an as needed basis, while not surrendering their own jurisdiction or relinquishing any of their rights. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: Section 1. The foregoing preambles are hereby incorporated into this Agreement as if fully restated in this Section 1. Section 2. a. The Parties agree that Kendall County Code Official Brian Holdiman and the United City of Yorkville Building Code Official Pete Ratos shall perform the following services on the other party’s behalf when requested: footing inspections; backfill inspections; foundation wall inspections; concrete slab inspections; rough framing inspections; rough electric inspections; underground electric inspections; electric service inspections; insulation inspections; roofing inspections and final inspections. In instances where Holdiman or Ratos inspect and find violations and a code enforcement action is required in court or administrative adjudication, Holdiman or Ratos may be requested to be a witness to verify any violations found during their inspection. If it is requested that either Ratos or Holdiman attend an administrative or court hearing in regard to violations, then they shall be given reasonable notice of no less than fourteen (14) days for such hearing and they shall attend as requested. b. The Parties agree that the United City of Yorkville Building Code Official Pete Ratos may, in his discretion, perform plumbing inspections on Kendall County’s behalf when requested. In instances where Ratos performs plumbing inspections and finds Page 3 of 10 violations and a code enforcement action is required in court or administrative adjudication, Ratos may be requested to be a witness to verify any violations found during his inspection. If it is requested that Ratos attend an administrative or court hearing in regard to violations, then he shall be given reasonable notice of no less than fourteen (14) days for such hearing and he shall attend as requested. Section 3. The Parties agree that the following inspection services shall not be provided under this agreement: plan review; permit approval, and; initial site inspections prior to a permit being issued. Section 4. Upon request, the Parties agree to coordinate and assist each other in the parties’ performance of the inspections set forth in Section 2 of this Agreement only under the following circumstances: a. If Kendall County Code Official Holdiman or City Building Code Official Ratos is absent from work due to illness, vacation, on an approved leave of absence, or otherwise unavailable to perform one or more of the above listed inspections within Section 2(a) for their respective jurisdiction; and/or b. If Kendall County Code Official Holdiman or City Building Code Official has a conflict of interest in performing one or more of the inspections set forth in Section 2(a) for their respective jurisdiction; and/or c. If the Kendall County Plumbing Contractor is absent from work due to illness, vacation, on an approved leave of absence, or otherwise unavailable to perform plumbing inspections for his or her respective jurisdiction; and/or d. If the Kendall County Plumbing Contractor has a conflict of interest in performing plumbing inspections for his or her respective jurisdiction. Page 4 of 10 For purposes of this Agreement, the party requesting assistance shall be referred to as “the home jurisdiction” and the party providing the inspection services assistance as set forth in Section 2 shall be referred to as “the visiting inspector”. Section 5. In the event the visiting inspector is unable to perform the inspection services set forth in Section 2 of this Agreement, the home jurisdiction shall be responsible for performing its inspection or shall be responsible for retaining and payment of a third party to perform the inspection. Section 6. When the visiting inspector performs an inspection on behalf of the home jurisdiction, the visiting inspector shall utilize the building codes of the home jurisdiction where the inspection is taking place. As such, when an inspection is within the corporate limits of the City, the Kendall County inspector shall use the building codes that are currently adopted and enforced by the City at the time of the inspection. When an inspection is in an unincorporated portion of Kendall County, where the County has jurisdiction, the City inspector shall utilize the building codes that are currently adopted and enforced by Kendall County at the time of the inspection. Section 7. When a home jurisdiction requests the visiting inspector’s assistance, the home jurisdiction shall provide a minimum of twenty-four (24) hours notice when there is a foreseeable need for the other party’s inspection services. In the event of an illness or other emergency, the parties agree to provide each other with as much advance notice as possible if a visiting inspector’s services are needed pursuant to Section 4. Section 8. Inspections must be completed using the proper jurisdiction’s forms. Prior to the commencement of any requested inspection, the home jurisdiction requesting assistance will prepare and provide all necessary inspection reports/forms for use by the visiting inspector Page 5 of 10 and deliver them to the visiting inspector prior to the inspection taking place. Following an inspection, the original, completed inspection reports/forms shall be returned to the home jurisdiction within twenty-four (24) hours after completion of the inspection. After the visiting inspector has returned the original, completed inspection reports/forms to the home jurisdiction, the visiting inspector shall not be required to retain the records of inspections for the home jurisdiction after performing inspections under this Agreement. Section 9. Neither the City nor Kendall County shall subcontract the services provided to the other under this agreement to a third-party inspector without the prior written consent of the other party. Section 10. There will be no compensation paid to, or by, either jurisdiction for the sharing of services under this Agreement. Section 11. When a visiting inspector performs an inspection under this Agreement for the home jurisdiction, the visiting inspector shall use their own equipment, tools and vehicles, and the home jurisdiction shall not be responsible for reimbursing the visiting inspector for mileage or any other expenses incurred by the visiting inspector. Section 12. The City and Kendall County shall each defend, with counsel of the other party’s own choosing, indemnify and hold harmless the other party, including past, present and future board members, elected officials, insurers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities, obligations, losses, penalties, fines, damages, and expenses and costs relating thereto, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees and other legal expenses, which the other party, its past, present and future board members, elected officials, insurers, employees, and/or agents may hereafter sustain, incur or be required to pay relating to or arising in any manner out of the inspections to be performed by the other party under this agreement. As such, Page 6 of 10 when the City performs an inspection for Kendall County, the City will defend with counsel of Kendall County’s own choosing, indemnify and hold harmless Kendall County as set forth above relating to the City’s and the City Building Code Official’s actions in the performance of their duties under this Agreement. When Kendall County performs an inspection for the City, Kendall County will defend with counsel of the City’s own choosing, indemnify and hold harmless the City as set forth above relating to Kendall County’s and the County Code Official’s actions in the performance of their duties under this Agreement. Section 13. Nothing in this agreement shall be deemed to change or alter the jurisdiction of either the City or Kendall County in any respect, including, but not limited to their building and zoning regulations, powers and duties. Section 14. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder may not be assigned (except by operation of law), and the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any party, other than the parties and their respective successors and assigns, any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by reason of such agreements. Section 15. This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced under the laws of the State of Illinois. Any legal proceeding related to enforcement of this Agreement shall be brought in the Circuit Court of Kendall County, Illinois, Twenty-Third Judicial Circuit. In case any provision of this Agreement shall be declared and/or found invalid, illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall, to the extent possible, be modified by the court in such manner as to be valid, legal and enforceable so as to most nearly retain the intent of the parties, and, if such modification is not possible, such provision shall be severed from this Page 7 of 10 Agreement, and in either case the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. Section 16. All notices required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and may be given by (a) depositing the same in the United States mail, addressed to the party to be notified, postage prepaid and certified with the return receipt requested, (b) delivering the same in person, or (c) telecopying the same with electronic confirmation of receipt: If to the County: Director Kendall County Planning, Building & Zoning 111 West Fox Street, Room 203 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Fax: 630-553-4179 With copy to: Kendall County State’s Attorney 807 John Street Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Fax: 630-553-4204 If to the City: Community Development Director United City of Yorkville Building Safety and Zoning 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Fax: 630-553-7264 Or any such other person, counsel or address as any party hereto shall specify pursuant to this Section from time to time. Section 17. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts (including facsimile signatures), each of which shall be deemed to be an original and both of which shall constitute one and the same Agreement. Section 18. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties and there are no other promises or conditions in any other agreement whether oral or written. Except Page 8 of 10 as stated herein, this agreement supersedes any other prior written or oral agreements between the parties and may not be further modified except in writing acknowledged by both parties. Section 19. Nothing contained in this Agreement, nor any act of Kendall County or the City pursuant to this Agreement, shall be deemed or construed by any of the parties hereto or by third persons, to create any relationship of third party beneficiary, principal, agent, limited or general partnership, joint venture, or any association or relationship involving Kendall County and the City. Further, nothing in this agreement should be interpreted to give Kendall County or the City any control over the other’s employees or imply a power to direct the employees of the other government body, which neither entity may exercise. Section 20. When performing inspections under the terms of this Agreement, Kendall County and City intend that any injuries to their respective employee shall be covered and handled exclusively by their jurisdiction’s own worker’s compensation insurance in place at the time of such injury. It is further agreed that all employee benefits, wage and disability payments, pension and worker’s compensation claims, damage to or destruction of equipment, facilities, clothing and related medical expenses of the City or Kendall County and their respective inspectors, which may result from their activities under this Agreement, shall be the responsibility of the jurisdiction which employs the inspector making such a claim. Section 21. The Parties will obtain and continue in force, during the term of this Agreement, all insurance as set forth below. Each insurance policy shall not be cancelled or changed without thirty (30) days prior written notice, given by the respective insurance carrier(s) to the parties at the addresses set forth in Section 16. Before starting inspections hereunder, the parties shall obtain the following insurance at a minimum: (a) Worker’s Compensation and Occupational Disease Disability insurance, in compliance with the laws of the jurisdiction where Page 9 of 10 the work is being performed; (b) Employer’s comprehensive general liability insurance for both personal injury and property damage in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate; (c) Comprehensive business automobile liability insurance in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit; and (d) Comprehensive excess liability insurance with a combined minimum single limit of $1,000,000 for each occurrence and $5,000,000 aggregate. Certificates of such insurance detailing the coverage therein shall be available to the other party upon execution of this Agreement. Neither party waives its immunities or defenses, whether statutory or common law by reason of the indemnification and insurance provisions contained in this Agreement. Section 22. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period of one (1) year from the date of the last signature below, however it may be renewed upon agreement of the parties in writing. Section 23. Either party may terminate this Agreement by providing thirty (30) calendar days’ advance written notice to the other party. However, any act of bad faith in the execution of duties under this Agreement shall result in immediate termination of the other party’s duties as laid out herein. For the purpose of this agreement, “bad faith” is an intentional dishonest act by not fulfilling legal or contractual obligations, misleading another, entering into an agreement without the intention or means to fulfill it, or violating basic standards of honesty in dealing with others. Also, the parties agree to provide prompt written notice within fifteen (15) calendar days to the other party if Kendall County Code Official Brian Holdiman’s or City Building Code Official Pete Ratos’ employment ceases for whatever reason. In such event, this Agreement shall immediately terminate upon receipt of said written notice. Page 10 of 10 Section 24. The parties understand and agree that this Agreement in no way creates a joint employment relationship between the Parties. The Parties understand and agree that they are solely responsible for paying all wages, benefits and any other compensation due and owing to its employees for the performance of visiting inspector services set forth in this Agreement. The parties further understand and agree that the parties are solely responsible for making all required payroll deductions and other tax and wage withholdings pursuant to state and federal law for its employees who perform visiting inspector services as set forth in this Agreement. Section 25. Kendall County and the City each hereby warrant and represent that their respective signatures set forth below have been, and are on the date of this Agreement, duly authorized by all necessary and appropriate corporate and/or governmental action to execute this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Intergovernmental Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the date below in the United City of Yorkville, Illinois. County of Kendall, a unit of local government United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, of the State of Illinois Illinois, a municipal corporation By: ____________________________ By: ____________________________ Chair, Kendall County Board Mayor Date: ____________________________ Date: ____________________________ Attest: Attest: __________________________________ ____________________________ County Clerk City Clerk Resolution No. 2019-____ Page 1 Resolution No. 2019-_____ A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR RECIPROCAL BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AND KENDALL COUNTY BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1: That the Intergovernmental Agreement for Reciprocal Building Inspections Services Between Kendall County, Illinois and the United City of Yorkville, Illinois - 2019, attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as Exhibit A, is hereby approved, and Gary Golinski, Mayor, and Beth Warren, City Clerk, be and are hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the United City of Yorkville. Section 2: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and approval as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this ________ day of ____________________, 2019. ______________________________ CITY CLERK CARLO COLOSIMO ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ ARDEN JOE PLOCHER ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ SEAVER TARULIS ________ JASON PETERSON ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this ________ day of ______________________, 2019. ______________________________ MAYOR Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. Informational item. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #11 Tracking Number EDC 2019-18 Downtown Parking – W. Van Emmon Street Economic Development Committee - February 5, 2019 N/A N/A N/A Proposed time-limited restricted parking for two (2) on-street public parking spaces. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Request Summary Staff has been approached by business owners within the downtown, specifically on the west side of IL Route 47, seeking to limit parking for two (2) of on-street public parking stalls to a maximum of 15 minutes during the busy weekday lunch time rush of 11:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. We are seeking feedback from the EDC on this request. Existing Downtown Parking Conditions The west block of Van Emmon Street currently has four (4) on-street parking spaces available for public use on the north side of the road, as seen in the aerial below. Staff is proposing to limit the two (2) easterly spaces to 15-minute parking during the hours between 11:00 A.M. and 2:00 P.M. Monday – Friday. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: January 23, 2019 Subject: Downtown Parking – W. Van Emmon Street Proposed Restricted Parking Currently, there are approximately five (5) businesses located immediately adjacent to these parking stalls, whose customers would regularly utilize these spaces, and would be directly impacted by the proposed change in regulatory parking: Belladonna Tea + Coffee (beverage & food); Hoof + Horn (metaphysical supply store); Harmony Aesthetics (beauty and spa services); 4 You Massage (personal care services); and Living Divina (yoga & fitness studio). While this quadrant of the downtown is adequately parked by the City’s public parking facility at the corner of S. Main Street and Van Emmon, the various on-street parking spaces on the south side of W. Van Emmon, and the private parking spaces located off the West Alley, the parking stalls on the north side of W. Van Emmon are of premium location for these businesses during peak lunch hour times. Proposed Downtown Parking Regulations As proposed, the time-limited parking stalls would allow patrons in the downtown to either quickly make short stops to the nearby businesses or drop off other riders and locate longer parking options in the area without having to cross traffic. The stalls would be identified with a sign detailing the 15-minute time limit would only be in operation from 11:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. from Monday through Friday each week. Outside of these times, the on-street parking spaces are available for all visitors to the downtown without time limit. Staff has spoken with some of the directly impacted business owners in the area who expressed support of the proposed time limitation for the parking and we anticipate the proposed parking regulations to have no impact on other businesses within the downtown. Enforcement will be done under the current Title 6: Motor vehicles and Traffic section of the City Code by the Police Department. Regarding the cost for sign fabrication and installation, the Public Works department has estimated the cost per sign to be approximately $155 and would take between 2-3 weeks to receive the signs after placing an order. Installation would be done in-house by the Public Works department staff. Staff Comments Staff anticipates having an open discussion with the Economic Development Committee (EDC) on the proposed downtown parking regulations. If it is the direction of the EDC to move forward with this request, the City Attorney will prepare a draft traffic control ordinance for consideration at an upcoming City Council meeting.