Loading...
City Council Minutes 2002 11-26-02 i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE. KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 800 GAME FARM ROAD, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2002. Mayor Prochaska called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Clerk Milschewski called the roll. Ward I James Present Sticka Present Ward H Burd Present Kot Present Ward III Anderson Present Munns Present Ward N Besco Present Spears Present OUORUM A quorum was established. INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS Mayor Prochaska welcomed guests and asked those present to enter their name on the attendance sheet provided. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA Alderman Kot tabled the Grande Reserve - Metro Traffic Study Contract under the Public Works Committee Report until the next City Council meeting. Alderwoman Spears tabled the proposed contract for web development and technology services under the Administration Committee Report until the next City Council meeting. City Attorney Dan Kramer tabled the consent for the creation of a special service tax area, the i ordinances establishing the special service area and the enabling ordinances to create a special tax service areas for both Heartland Circle and Windette Ridge. This will be tabled until he receives signed consents from the record titleholders. City Treasurer Allen tabled the October Treasurer's Report until the next City Council meeting. COMIVIITTEE MEETING DATES Public Works Committee 6:30 P.M., Monday, December 23, 2002 City of Yorkville Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road Economic Development Committee 7:00 P.M., Thursday, December 19, 2002 City of Yorkville Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road Administration Committee 6:30 P.M., Thursday, December 12, 2002 City of Yorkville Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road Public Safety Committee 6:30 P.M., Wednesday, December 18, 2002 City of Yorkville Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road PRESENTATION Senator Edward Petka Mayor Prochaska presented Senator Edward Petka with a Certificate of Appreciation and a United City of Yorkville flag in recognition of his sixteen years as senator for western Kendall County. Senator Petka addressed the Council and stated that it has been his honor and privilege to serve the area. He stated that he has had the opportunity to meet many Yorkville residents and to become friends with them and he expressed his sadness at being redistricted out of the area. He stated that Yorkville did not loose a senator but rather gained one because he will always consider his former constituents in Kendall County as people who reflect the same value system that he has. He expressed his hopes that his service in the General Assembly will double the efforts for the City of Yorkville. - The Minutes of the ReLyular MeetinLF of the Citv Council - November 26. 2002 - naee 2 CITIZEN COMMENTS Doris Dick, 504 Teri Lane, addressed the Council and distributed a letter (see attached). She expressed her concerns regarding the Heartland Circle annexation and Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement. Her concerns were sewer service, the developers traffic study, construction traffic and lot size. Richard Stone, 176 Tuma Road, addressed the Council and thanked them for the their time and - diligence regarding the Heartland Circle development. He stated that no one wants to stop the subdivision but they want what is best for Yorkville. He complimented the homes in Heartland I. Mr. Stone distributed and read a letter addressed to Mayor Prochaska dated November 26, 2002 (see attached). His concern was that the right -of -way for an access road to Tuma Road was on his lot line and fifteen feet from his living room. He stated that he felt that this was a potential safety hazard for his family and was in violation of city and county ordinances. Attached to his letter were photographs of other access roads, the road in relationship to his home and the distances between existing homes in Heartland. Mr. Stone commented that at the last City Council meeting, Mr. Marker's representative stated that it was City Engineer Joe Wywrot's idea to put the right -of -way up against Mr. Stone's lot line. Mr. Stone stated that he has since spoken with Mr. Wywrot who said that he recommended the road be centered between lots 49 and 50. He felt that since the developer's representatives are making claims regarding City employees, it is imperative that every detail be spelled out in the PUD. Michael Burks, 302 Oakwood, addressed the Council regarding Heartland Circle. He stated that he is a life long resident of Yorkville who lives in the subdivision common to the Heartland area. He commented that he did not see any problems with the product that Mr. Marker is producing. He stated that the developer seems to be working with everyone, which is evident by the changes they made in the plan. He wanted it recognized that there are people who support the development and as development is coming to Yorkville the better developers should be recognized. He also stated that the development affects residents and local business that build the homes on lots purchased from Mr. Marker. He noted that some local builders are building their own homes in Heartland so funds are reinvested in the City. He also commented on the quality of Heartland I and stated that he felt that this would continue in Heartland Circle. Sean Michels, 748 Tudor Court, Sugar Grove, addressed the Council. He stated that he is an employee of McCue Builders who is one of the builders building in Heartland I and Heartland has !' been a good development for McCue. He felt that people moving into the subdivision appreciate the open space that was planned into the development and which is being carried through in j Heartland Circle. He stated that the Markers have scrutinized the architectural styles requiring brick facades. He stated that Markers have been willing to work with the City and that the City should appreciate the developer of Heartland Circle. j Gary Szurkowski, 1211 Mistwood, addressed the Council. He stated that he was a representative of DTS Design Contractors who is a builder. He stated that he chose to build his own home in Heartland even though he could have chosen to build anywhere. He stated that he has been involved with other PUD's in the Aurora area and felt that Marker had many good ideas especially the one to have multiple builders in a subdivision. He noted that this eliminates spec homes which all look the same and that Marker Associates scrutinize the drawings. He stated that ten years from now the subdivision will look as beautiful as it does today and felt it was a family- oriented subdivision with green areas and paths. He stated that this is what drew him to build his family home in the subdivision and he felt there was a feeling of community and this would help maintain the small town atmosphere as Yorkville grows. I Jesus Munoz, 203 E. Spring Street, addressed the Council. His expressed his concern that when the property for Heartland I was purchased, the developer planned to purchase this piece of property. He questioned why the developer did not leave space in Heartland I for a roadway that would connect Heartland Circle to Route 34. Mary Heeren, 14 Parkbrive South, addressed the Council with her concerns regarding Heartland Circle. She stated that she has attended the public hearings and meetings regarding the development and lot size has always been discussed. She asked that the developer abide by the lot size set by the City. Also, she was concerned about traffic coming through existing, quiet neighborhoods. She stated that these issues have been discussed for several months and she felt that they have not been resolved. She thanked the members of the Council who spoke at the last City Council meeting because they heard what so many people were saying about the development. Gary Neyer, 1223 Mistwood, addressed the Council. He stated that he has been an employee of Richard Marker Associates for twenty -five years and he would not have stayed with the developer for so many years if he did not believe in what they are doing. He stated that I The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council - November 26, 2002 - Aage 3 he believes enough in the development to move his own family there. He noted that he enjoyed the fact that there is a lot of open space in the development, more so than in a straight twelve thousand foot lot subdivision and he stated that children can ride their bikes to a community park without crossing a street. He noted that these same issues and ideas are being implemented in Heartland Circle. He commented that he had the choice to build in this type of community and the choice should be made available to others who would like to live in Yorkville. Daniel O'Neill, 674 Andrea Court, addressed the Council and thanked them for their time considering this matter. He stated that even though those opposing the development may have valid concerns, there should be compromises made. He stated the sewer problem should not prohibit building but rather postpone it until the problem is fixed. He asked that everyone keep in mind that the concern regarding construction traffic is temporary. He stated that he felt it was important to consider that the development will not contain the same style home over and over. He felt that the time spent in making each house different shows the developer cares. He noted that the roads in the Heartland subdivisions are curved which prevents speeding and helps to keep it safer for children playing. He commented that there will be two parks between the Heartland subdivisions in which to play. He also noted that if Richard Marker Associates does not build this subdivision someone else will and there could be track homes on the property. He stated that he supported the subdivision and asked the Council to vote in favor for it. Barry Mayworm, 765 Heartland Drive, addressed the Council. He stated that he picked to build in Heartland because it is a quality development. He noted that this type of development does not come along all the time and should not be taken for granted. He stated that the developer has voluntarily done many things that other developers wouldn't do under any circumstances and has tried to accommodate the local residents, as has the City Council. He stated that Richard Marker is a quality builder who has been in business for over twenty -five years. He stated that if this development were in the middle of a cornfield, there wouldn't be any opposition. Greg Millen, owner of St. Joseph's Cabinetry, addressed the Council. He stated that he has just recently built a home in Heartland. He explained that he makes his living designing beautiful kitchens from $5,000.00 to $80,000.00 and he is very particular with the integrity he puts into a kitchen. He submitted drawings of his home and the Markers denied the first few sets because they insisted he put more brick or flagstone on the fagade of the house. He stated that he is glad they insisted on this detail because he is happy with the way the house has turned out and he respects their opinion and their push to "up" the standards. He saluted Mr. Marker and his associates for their efforts. He also pointed out that Mr. Marker's sons, along with other relatives and City employees live in Heartland I. He noted that the homes in Heartland Circle will probably sell for $300,000.00 to $400,000.00 and won't be "cookie cutter" houses. He stated that he wanted to see this developer stay in Yorkville and encouraged the Council to vote in favor of the development. Mike Bollweg, 9301 Quinsey Lane, addressed the Council and explained that his property borders the south end of the subdivision. He stated that during the first planning stage of the development, Richard Marker invited him to view the concept plan and assured him that there would not be a lot within 240 feet of his property. This area was to be for detention. This plan has vanished and now there is a reduced detention area causing runoff to flow over his property. Mr. Bollweg stated that Mr. Marker spoke about putting a pipe through the area but has not offered to purchase an easement from him. He felt there should be more studies done as to the drainage before the development is approved. He stated that he will monitor the flow and quality of the water flowing over his property and will take action if he is not satisfied. I Larry King, 900 E. Spring Street, addressed the Council and commented that he felt that the approval of the Heartland Circlg development was being rushed. He stated that development projects already underway should be "digested" to see how they affect his little comer of the community bordered by Routes 47 and 34, the Fox River and Tuma Road. He stated that Heartland I was not in question; it is a fine development with good access. He discussed the traffic study and how the people in that corner of Yorkville live the traffic every day and don't need someone from outside the area to explain it to them. He stated that he has followed this development through all the phases of the process and Richard Marker Associates were given recommendations, guidelines, deadlines and ultimatums on the PUD agreement and plat. He felt that a lot of these things have still not been addressed and that the language of the PUD regarding density and lot sizes should be changed. He commented that it would be hard to find another subdivision in the State of Illinois of this size that does not have access to a main thoroughfare or U.S. highway. He stated that he felt that the development infringes on existing neighborhoods, devalues homes in existing surrounding neighborhoods, will clog the streets and will compromise the safety of the children of the area. He stated he appreciated the Council members who voted against, this at the last City Council meeting. I The Minutes of the Reeular Meeting of the Citv Council - November 26.2002.2002 - naue 4 Mr. Heeren, Tuma Road, addressed the Council and stated that everyone was losing site of the fact that the people around Heartland Circle were asking for small concession such as lot size and traffic. He stated that residents don't have a problem with Heartland I and they are .not saying that they do not want homes built just that they want their concerns taken into consideration. There were no further citizen's comments. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. i PLANNING COMMISSION /ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL /SIGN REVIEW BOARD Alderman Sticka reported that the Plan Commission had two public hearings at their last meeting. One hearing was for proposed senior apartments on Route 47 south of Route 71. The affordable apartments would be for residents sixty -two years old or older. Rents range from $475.00 to $575.00 and are government assisted. There were concerns from residents on Walnut Drive regarding the proximity of the development to their homes. The Plan Commission had concerns regarding the garages being separate from the houses. The builder explained that this was done in order to keep the rents low. The Plan Commission decided that the plan as presented was not appropriate for the City of Yorkville and suggested that the developer make changes and/or modifications and return to the Commission on December 11, 2002. The other item was the Menard's residential development and the neighbors were concerned with traffic, construction, flooding, drainage and the affect of the development on their wells. The Plan Commission voted unanimously for annexation and the R -2 PUD. They asked that the developer observe the comments of City Planned Mike Schoppe and City Engineer Wywrot. They also reviewed Fox River Bluffs, which is under the 1 '/z mile review. Their main concern with the development was emergency exits /entrances because of the railroad track running through it. MINUTES FOR APPROVAL - A motion was made by Alderman Anderson to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting from November 12, 2002: seconded by Alderman James. Motion approved by a viva voce vote. BILLS FOR APPROVAL A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to approve the paying of the bills listed on the Vendor Invoice Register #223 dated November 22, 2002. Checks in the amount of $302,867.60(vendor), $100,266.73 (payroll period ending 11/02/02), for a total of $403,134.33: seconded by Alderman Anderson. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye REPORTS ATTORNEY'S REPORT No report. MAYOR'S REPORT Appointment of Dean Bromann to Zoning Board of Appeals Mayor Prochaska reported on his recommendation of Dean Bromann to the Zoning Board of Appeals. He stated that Mr. Bromann resides in the White Oak Subdivision and has asked to be considered for appointment to the Board. This appointment will be through May 2007. Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve the appointment of Dean Bromann to the Zoning Board of Appeals. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Besco. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye, Besco -aye 2002 Tax Levy Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve the Public Hearing for the consideration of the proposed Tax Levy increase by the United City of Yorkville for 2002 to be held on December 10, 2002 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chamber, 800 Game Farm Road. Any person desiring to appear at the public hearing and present testimony for the taxing district may contact the City The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council - November 26.2002.2002 - Dage 5, Treasurer, Bob Allen, or the Finance Director, Traci Pleckham, at 800 Game Farm Road; telephone number 630 -553 -4350. The corporate and special purpose property taxes for 2001 were $1,255,485.21. The proposed corporate and special purpose property taxes to be levied in 2002 are $1,476,592.00. This represents a 17.6% increase over the previous year. There were no reassessments this year so the increase in assessments was generally caused by the sale or improvement of property. The City has historically incorporated this increase into the average assessed value home to determine a new rate. The rate for 2002 is .091260/$100.00 of assessed value. Last years rate was .09286/$100.00 of assessed value. There was a reduction in the tax rate charged to homeowners. So moved by Alderman Besco; seconded by Alderman Anderson. Mayor Prochaska noted that City Attorney Dan Kramer pointed out that the assessment pool or number of dollars has grown every year based on new development especially new commercial development. The Council has tried to hold the rate or reduce it if possible. Residents whose property was not reassessed should see a reduction in the City portion of their taxes. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye Blackberry Creek Update Mayor Prochaska gave an update on the Blackberry Creek Interceptor Project. He stated that Deuchler & Associates have met with the Conservation Design Forum (CDF) and seen the executive summary of their report. A recommendation was made to the Yorkville- Bristol Sanitary District (YBSD) to look at "Option 6" for the Blackberry Creek Interceptor. This option is for a lift station along Route 47 near Menards and runs a force main down Route 47 to Countryside Parkway. A gravity line would run down Countryside Parkway along the existing sewer. This would then connect to the interceptor on Route 34. YBSD authorized Deuchler to prepare the maps and get the area "J.U.L.I.E.'d" in an effort to begin the engineering for the project. The route along the Blackberry Creek is no longer being recommended. The YBSD has proposed an intergovernmental agreement for this project in which they will own the interceptors and the City will own the lift station. This is being discussed by the Public Works Committee and reviewed by the City Attorney and should come before the Council sometime in January. CITY CLERK'S REPORT No report. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT No report. Mr. Allen commented that it was good to see people attending the City Council meeting. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT No report. i FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report. 1 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT C No report. CHIEF OF POLICE REPORT No report. DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION No report. COMMUNITY & LIAISON REPORT Kendall County Board Meeting Alderwoman Spears reported that she attended the November 19, 2002 Kendall County Board meeting where Tim McCann announced that the State's Attorney's office would be conducting a meeting on December 4, 2002 at 7:00 P.M. at the courthouse addressing the Open Meetings Act. Also discussed was the Alternate Bond Ordinance for the new County office building (passed 6 to 4) and Alternate Bond Ordinance for the Kendall County Jail expansion ( passed 9 -1). They agreed to a intergovernmental agreement with Bristol Township for the $700,000.00 construction cost at the Galena, Eldamain and Ash intersection. Bristol Township agreed to pay $200,000.00 of the cost and they also discussed the County Kennel. I I I I The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council - November 26, 2002, 2002 - oage 6 Kendall County Senior Services Meeting Alderwoman Spears reported that she attended the Kendall County Senior Service Providers meeting on November 18, 2002 where it was announced that there is going to be a Senior Legislative Session held on December 9, 2002 from 12:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M. at Pottawatomie Community Center in St. Charles, Illinois. It was also announced that Grundy and Kendall Counties have signed an intergovernmental transportation agreement and are waiting for funding to become available. Also, the new County Administrator Jeff Wilkins was introduced. It was - also discussed if the Health and Human Services would still be located in Countryside Center. Park & Recreation Board Meeting Alderman James reported that the Park Board is working on a Park Master Plan and will be randomly sending out about one thousand surveys to homes in Yorkville. This information will be used to create the Master Plan. Mayor Prochaska asked all those receiving the survey to take time to fill it out and return the survey. COMMITTEE REPORTS PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT I Grande Reserve - Metro Traffic Studv Contract A motion was made by Alderman Kot to table the Grande Reserve -Metro traffic study contract until the next City Council meeting on December 10, 2002; seconded by Alderman Sticka Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT Reconsideration for Annexation & P.U.D. Agreement/Heartland Circle Alderman Sticka noted that this item would require a motion by Alderman Kot, Munn or Besco. A motion was made by Alderman Munns to reconsider the motion for an ordinance for the Annexation and approval of the Planned Unit Development between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois and Richard Marker Assoc., Inc. developer and Taus Trust, owner of record; seconded by Alderwoman Burd. Mayor Prochaska noted that this was only a vote to reconsider not the actual vote on the annexation and agreement. Alderman Kot asked to clarify that this was the same motion that was presented to the Council two weeks earlier and nothing has changed. That evening there were three nay votes and even with the full Council present there still wouldn't have been enough to meet the super majority requirements. Attorney Kramer stated that this was correct. Alderman Sticka clarified that this vote decides if there will be a subsequent vote and Attorney Kramer stated that this was correct. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -6 Nays -2 Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye, Besco -nay, Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -nay (Ordinance) 2002 -47 Annexation and PUD Agreement Richard Marker Associates, Inc. A motion was made by Alderman Sticka. to approve an ordinance for the Annexation and Planned Unit Development between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois and Richard Marker Assoc., Inc. developer and Taus Trust, owner of record; seconded by Alderwoman Burd. Alderman Kot commented that the overriding factor with this development is traffic. He stated that he bad an opportunity to review, analyze and discuss the traffic studies with Smith Engineering. The reports regarding the traffic study of Route 47 and Somonauk Road indicate an overall rating of "B" however the major concern is the movement of traffic at this intersection at the peak hours when it is rated "D ". This is the worse acceptable rating that the state will allow. Currently, without the subdivision, the intersection has a "C' rating. He stated that he felt that the City of Yorkville should hold this to a higher standard because this will affect people for many years to come and he felt that the lower rating is not acceptable. He discussed the widening I The Minutes of the Regular - � Meeting of the City Council - November 26, 2002, 2002 aage 7 of Route 47 and how the change in Governors may change when this project will actually get done. He stated that he has not changed his mind since the last vote i Alderman Munns commented that at the last vote he was 55% to 45% for the development but he felt that there was enough information that needed to be researched. He stated that he spent considerable time and effort on this issue. He received many calls from individuals representing both sides including local businesses that noted that local tradesmen spend money in the community. He stated that he walked the area, drove around Heartland I and investigated Teri Lane where it will join the new subdivision. He felt that Heartland I has the nicest houses in any subdivision in Yorkville. He stated that development is money for the City and it is coming either way. If Heartland Circle isn't built on the property, there will still be homes built there eventually because the property will accommodate homes sooner or later. He doubted that if this happens the houses would be better than those in Heartland I. He noted that in regards to density, the developer could add more homes even if they went with 12,000 square foot lots. He noted that other developments have traffic issues such as Fox Hill where he lives. He asked that whatever happens, the residents of Yorkville be civil to each other and realize that we are all in the same city together. Alderman Sticka explained his yes vote by reading a statement (see attached). He comments were: ➢ The Plan Commission approved the Plan and the Chairman even complimented the proposal. ➢ The Park Board, after lengthy negotiation, gave their approval of the subdivision. ➢ R -2 zoning allows for 3.3 dwellings /acre. The proposed subdivision has 262 lots but could l have 165 homes per the zoning. The average lot size is 12,331 square feet. The smallest lots are slightly more than 10,000 square feet. ➢ There is a trail system that can be accessed by everyone in Yorkville but is maintained by the subdivision's property owners. ➢ All the lots in Heartland have been sold with the smaller lots being sold first even though they carry a higher price. ➢ This is the last large parcel of land in this area of the City and it is not sprawl but infill. ➢ Other farms were sold and developed so that the homes of those objecting to this development could be built. Residents in the Wackerlin subdivision objected to the homes on Teri Lane but the City Council backed the developer and the homes on Teri Lane were built. Also, the residents in the older homes along Route 47 objected to the Prairie Park subdivision but it still was built. ➢ The old comprehensive plan showed Spring Street continuing east and crossing the Fox River, which would create more traffic. Heartland Circle precludes this possibility. ➢ The traffic study indicates that the existing streets can handle the additional traffic flow. ➢ The developer is paying $140,000.00 in fees to the school district that he is not required to Pay• ➢ The developer is a local business and local tradesmen are building the houses. He concluded by stating that Heartland is an attractive upscale subdivision and he believes that Heartland Circle will be as well. Alderwoman Spears stated the she received a lot of correspondences and telephone calls regarding this. She expressed her concern regarding Quinsey Lane. She stated that it would be impossible for residents to back out of Quinsey Lane and she asked the Markers if they would be willing to install a turn- around for these residents. Steve Roake of Roake & Associates, engineer for the developer, stated that he understood that Quinsey Lane would be widened at Spring Street so there would be enough room for two cars to get in and out of the location. The widened area would be for about 100 feet and be the equivalent of a two -lane road. Alderwoman Spears also asked that if permission is not granted for the proposed storm sewers south of the development how will this problem be addressed. Mr. Roake stated that by providing the storm water detention areas the rate of water run -off will be affected and he discussed this with the property owners. However, there will still be some flow across their property. If they permit it, the developer would like to install a storm sewer. Mr. Roake thought that Mr. Bollweg agreed to this. If he no longer has an interest in the storm sewer, the developer still has the right to discharge the storm water at the property line however this will be at a slower rate than the current unrestricted run -off that comes off the farm field. Attorney John Philipchuck, representing the developer, stated that this brings up a legal issue. He reiterated that if the developer does not get an easement, the detention area will be designed to release the water at the property line instead of a storm sewer. He stated that the law recognizes the right to continue an uninterrupted flow of water. Alderwoman Spears asked if the water would run -off directly into the Fox River. Mr. Philipchuck stated that the rainwater would absorb into the ground until the ground reaches a saturated point, then the water will have sheet flow over the ground. This is typical of farm fields. With the development of the property, the rainwater is collected in storm sewers and collected in detention facilities. It is then released at a designed rate that the i The Minutes of the Re ular Meetin - � � of the City Council - November 26, 2002 aaee 8 4 community has established. Ultimately, the run -off will reach the river. Alderman Besco mentioned the fact that the developer has produced several different copies of the Metro Transportation Group study. Every time he has viewed a new copy, the are different figures. He expressed his concern regarding Route 47 being able to accommodate the traffic from this and other developments. He stated that the Council should take the comments of the citizens seriously. Treasurer Allen asked Attorney Kramer if the City could face litigation over the drainage issue if it is not resolved. Attorney Kramer stated that this is a possibility but anyone seeking litigation would have to come to the City Engineer with a design, which he will reviewed and make recommendations for alternative ways to handle the discharge. Mr. Allen asked the Mayor if the Council could receive a response from the property owners since this is a new issue before the Council. He asked if Mr. Bollweg could be asked if he was satisfied with the response from Mr. Roake. Mayor Prochaska stated according to Robert's Rules the discussion has to stay with the people making the decision. He pointed out that Mr. Allen is not one of those decision - makers. The Mayor stated that he thought that the aldermen would take Mr. Bollweg's comments into consideration before casting their vote. Alderwoman Burd noted that the drainage issue is not new to the Council, they have discussed it at other meetings. She stated that Attorney Kramer explained the flow of water from property to property and City Engineer Wywrot has reviewed this issue. Alderwoman Burd also commented that she agreed 100% with Alderman Sticka's statement. She stated that she has been listening to the residents and their concerns and the mantra for 12,000 square foot lots does not change the density of the development. She stated that the developer is giving the City more open space than required so how can the City ask for more. She stated that this is the nicest subdivision that she has seen in her five years on the City Council. She stated that if the Council does not approve this development, people will think they have won but she felt that no one will win if this happens. If this does not pass, another developer will come along and the subdivision might not be as nice as this one. In regards to traffic, she noted that no one voted against the Jewel being built and this brought in more traffic than this subdivision will. She stated that she is supporting the development. Mayor Prochaska reminded the Council that the questions at this point are does the property get annexed and is the property unique enough for a PUD to apply. The vote has nothing to do with the layout or the agreement. That will be the next motion. Alderman Kot commented that how it gets annexed is critical to the other issues. He also responded to Alderwoman Burd's comment about the Jewel store; Jewel's traffic does not go through a neighborhood but goes out to a highway. He stated that he realizes he sounds negative but he is pleased with what Mr. Marker has developed so far but he feels that this particular plan does not fit this particular piece of property. He stated that people have moved to Yorkville to get away from gridlock and congestion and this will create it for the City. He stated that he felt the City could do better and the residents deserve it. Alderman Anderson commented that the Council has listened to the citizens. This is by far the longest annexation process that he has been involved with in his four years on the Council. He stated that this length of time is in response to the citizen's comments. He stated that throughout this time, there have been many changes to the original proposal because of citizen input. Alderman James agreed with Alderman Anderson's comments and noted that when Heartland I was being developed some unexpected things came up along Spring Street. Mr. Marker stepped up and corrected the problems. His past history with the city indicates that he is a good builder to work with. Alderwoman Spears clarified why she questioned the storm sewer system. She wanted to make sure the water was not going to be directly running off into the Fox River and possibly polluting it. Mayor Prochaska again noted that the Council was not voting for or against the development but whether it should be annexed and zoned in a PUD manner. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -6 Nays -2 Kot -nay, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye, Besco -nay, Burd -aye, James -aye I, i I I The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council - November 26, 2002.2002 - Dage 9 (Ordinance) 2002 -48 Execution of the Annexation and PUD Agreement Richard Marker Associates. Inc. A motion was made by Alderman Sticka to approve an ordinance authorizing the execution of an Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement of Richard Marker Associates, Inc. and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement; seconded by Alderman James. The Mayor commented that with this vote, the Council will be looking at the plan as it sits. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays -2 Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye, Besco -nay, Burd -a a James-aye, Kot -nay, Prochaska-aye e Y� Y� Y� Y (Ordinance) 2002 -49 Rezoning for Coach Road Hills n/k/a Windett Ridge A motion was made by Alderman Sticka to approve an ordinance granting rezoning for Michael Wheeler, Robert Davidson, Jr. and George Engel, owners and Wiseman- Hughes Enterprises, Inc., h an Illinois corporation, developer (Coach Road Hills n/k/a Windett Ridge Subdivision) from R -3 General Residence Districts to R -2 One Family Residence District and to modify the area zoned B -2 General Business District; seconded by Alderman Munns Mayor Prochaska noted that townhomes are being replaced with single - family homes in the plan and Administrator Graff noted that the business district is being increased. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye, (Ordinance) 2002 -50 Executing the Amendment to P.U.D. for Coach Road Hills n/k/a Windett Ridge A motion was made by Alderman Sticka to approve an ordinance authorizing the execution of a first amendment to the Planned Unit Development Agreement between the United City of Yorkville, a municipal corporation and Michael Wheeler, Robert Davidson, Jr. and George Engel, owners, and Wiseman- Hughes Enterprises, Inc., an Illinois corporation, developer, (Coach Road Hills Subdivision n/k/a/ Windett Ridge Subdivision) and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement; seconded by Alderman James. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -9 Nays -2 Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye, Besco -aye, Prochaska -aye PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT Request to Hire New Officer A motion was made by Alderman Anderson to approve the request by the Chief of Police to hire a full time police officer to begin employment after January 1, 2003; seconded by Alderman Munns. Mayor Prochaska stated that this is in the budget and the City is looking to get the process started because it takes six to seven months before the officer is on the streets. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye ADMINISTRATION COMIVIITftE REPORT Joint Policv Statement for Executive Dirl efor of Parks & Recreation A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to approve the Joint Policy Statement as agreed upon by the United City of Yorkville and the Yorkville Park and Recreation Board for the Executive Director's position; seconded by Alderman James. The Mayor noted that the wording requested by the City Council was included in the statement. Alderman Sticka asked who would be responsible for giving the Executive Director performance reviews. The Mayor noted that the statement states that it will be one representative appointed by the Park Board and the Mayor. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes- 8 Nays -0 Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye The Minutes of the Regular Meetine of the Citv Council- November 26, 2002.2002 - DaLye 10 Administration Secretary Job DescrpDtion A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to approve the revisions to the Administration Secretary job description; seconded by Alderman Sticka. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes- 8 Nays -0 Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye (Resolution) 2002 -39 First Time Homebuver Down Pavment Assistance Program A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to approve the resolution evidencing the intention of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois to issue Single Family Mortgage revenue Bonds and related matters; seconded by Alderman Sticka. Alderwoman Spears noted that this is the First Time Homebuyers Down Payment Assistance Program, which the City has participated in for several years. She noted that this has been a successful program. Mayor Prochaska noted that the City does not have any liability with the program and Attorney Kramer stated that it lends the City's tax- exempt status to the program. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes- 8 Nays -0 Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye Contract for Web Develonment & TechnolOLV Services A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to table the contract for technology - consulting services with Innovative Information Systems, Inc. until the next City Council meeting; seconded by Alderman Sticka. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Anderson -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye Administrator's Assistant Job DeSCriDti0n A motion was made b Alderwoman ' Spears to table the revisions to the Administrator's r y p s o s Assistant job description until the changes are received from the Labor Attorney; seconded by Alderman Sticka. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye I Library Architect Contract A motion was made by Alderwoman Spears to ratify the architectural contract services between the United City of Yorkville Public Library and Brunidge Cassell Associated of Elgin, Illinois. (Note: The Library Board approved this contract at their last meeting and funding is available for this contract.); seconded by Alderman Anderson. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye, Besco -aye I EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to go into executive sessions for the purposes of land acquisition for the purpose of purchasing or leasing of real property for the use of the public bodies being considered and collective bargaining for the purpose of negotiating matters between public employers and their employees or representatives. He asked that the City Adminsitrator, City Attorney, Chief of Police, City Clerk, City Treasurer and Park & Recreation Director be included. He stated that they may be action taken after the session. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Anderson Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Anderson -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Sticka -aye I Executive session was entered at 9:47P.M. o i The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council - November 26, 2002, 2002- Mee 11 i The Council returned to regular session at 9:50 P.M. Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a contract with THK Associates Inc. for the first phase of a feasibility study for marketing a golf course in Yorkville in the amount of $6125.00 plus direct expenses. So moved by Alderman James; seconded by Alderman Munns. —� Mayor Prochaska commented that the City is looking at this study to be a tool to help the City set aside open space. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Spears -aye, Sticka -aye, Anderson -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Kot -aye, Munns -aye ADDITIONAL BUSINESS None. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to adjourn. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderwoman Burd. Motion approved by a viva voce vote. Meeting adjourned at 9:51 P.M. Minutes submitted by: n • . -�, � Jacquelyn Milschewski, City Clerk City of Yorkville, Illinois I ' PLEASE SIGN IN MEETING CITY COUNCIL DATE: 11 -26 -02 NAME STREET ADDRF SS CITY R� `� ym4F,)AJ z tuf�v I ��, tilq � �rolg� U � 6 L & 12 j L tl c4s `1 d ,� 2 t rl C e�, r— o ,z v L u-t I l `►� Ci �e � � S M � �y / G V I A St�� L �, �K r( JI t L o4,wv-4 Y r k (A u P Kk 18 �a� ►���� ����� a dl l n PLEASE SIGN IN MEETING: CITY COUNCIL DATE: 11 -26 -02 NAM � ko�.1k � I I ✓l V . STREET ADDRESS L5 T il l Way Avvcw . �UO 6 l( r�tJ r"V,� �✓7 /��!zTCAo�J.p �vd CITY zlez �R�U��I V, , I X �� L- cr- PLEASE SIGN IN MEETING CITY COUNCIL DATE: 11 -26 -02 NAME rocc Elm 6 - ko "e Jane l ovrl F1 4 11 u a v At' Tn #1 OQ41.; STREET ADDRESS CITY ncfe-s I) l 76', 70 Rd, B12?; 03 E S <4' nif V6 kv I "7ct�� y. 5 1 G1 �G'i 'N t /m A.l- i) (� C. z� SARK bR . S "'i"© � rN g e lf) i 'l / .e, G-RA q S r' ke 4AW-6 S 3 2 -,QN ( fin_ �- ,J 14KrA) f � 1 , 4l 566i PLEASE SIGN IN MEETING CITY COUNCIL DATE: 11 -26 -02 NAME STREET ADDRESS CITY ` & JlCC&_ X�'te� Dear Members of the City Council, Thank you for this time to speak and for all the many hours you give to this community. Tonight is another important evening for many residents of this City & County, in which you will make a significant decision "if" a motion is made to reconsider the Heartland Circle Annexation and PUD Agreement between the United City of York- ville and Richard Marker Associates. I believe the important issues surrounding the development should be addressed publicly since it may include the taxpayers who will pay for a portion of the infrastructure for this new development. I believe it is unfortunate that Heartland (188 homes) is on a temporary sewer pump station. Maybe a few carts are ahead of the horses. I believe we all add to the sewer problems, but it should be ironed out and the cost, before we issue more permits. We will pay more for water next year. Will we pay another increase for sewer? Should the new Regional Pump Station's cost be reflective of Heartland and Heartland Circle which will be approx. 450 homes? Concerning the latest Traffic Study data obtained on November 12, 2002 I find the study was completed for 2 hours. 7:00- 9:00 a.m. only and only at Rt.47 and Somonauk St. and on a "Sunny day ". I must point out what I commented on before. Bus service is not provided for the high school and on rainy days many children ride in a vehicle to all 3 schools. This may be important since a study should include all the variables effecting the rate of this intersection. The end result from Smith Engineering Consultants review, states "all movements operate at a. level of service of D or better." What if we had a LOS F on the rainy days? What constitutes a study, 2 hours of data or data over a longer time span? Also is Spring Street gated at Tuma or West Road? Aren't the horizontal and vertical curves along with the 18 ft. width a safety issue? This was mentioned in the original Traffic Study , page 8 & 9, of June 14, 2002. The concern of construction traffic is important. Since the route is stated through Omaha Drive in Heartland as a note on the Engineering Plan, does this make it as legally binding as in the PUD Agreement? If the lots are too small for 30' side yard frontage on a street maybe larger lots would accommodate this. Just as it takes more than a house to make a home, it takes more than a development of beautiful houses to make a great Community. We anticipate your continued support for our community. Thank you, Doris Dick r November 14, 2002 Mr. Joseph Wywrot City Engineer City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois. 60560 Smith Engineering Consultants, Inc. Civil /Structural Engineers and Surveyors Illinois Texas Wisconsin RE: Heartland Circle Traffic Study Yorkville, Illinois MITH Job No. YORK- 020693 -7 Dear Mr. Wywrot: Smith Engineering Consultants, Inc. has completed a review of the revised traffic counts and capacity analysis received November 13, 2002 from Metro Transportation Group, Inc. for the Heartland Circle Residential Development. The revised traffic counts, taken on Tuesday, November 12, 2002, indicate that the a.m. peak hour is from 7:15 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. These counts appear to be reasonable as they include the morning school traffic. The capacity analysis provided by Metro Transportation Group indicates that the intersection of Illinois Route 47 and Somonauk Road operates at an overall level of service of B with an overall intersection delay of 17.4 sec /veh. All - movements operate at a level of service - of D or better, which is acceptable by the Illinois Department of Transportation. Since Metro Transportation Group has addressed all issues raised in our previous reviews and the revised capacity analysis and traffic counts are in accordance with our original findings and IDOT standards, the traffic study is approved as modified. Should you have any questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me at (630) 553 -7560. Sincerely, SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. Camie R. Ferrier Project Engineer - -- CRF /ams 2 � -� , . Y:Vobs\Smith\2002 \620693- Heartland Traffic Study \coirespondence \letters \000693 -7- heartland traffic review new cts- wywrot -crf -1 l 1402.doc 75 John Street, Yorkville, IL 60560 www.smithengineeritig.com Telephone 630.553.7560 Fax 630.553.7646 ([U3 a) Mr. Steve Roake June 14, 2002 Page 8 ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This section of the report will provide a discussion of the analyses performed at the study intersections during the weekday morning and evening peak periods to examine the impact of the anticipated site traffic on the surrounding roadway system. The evaluation included peak hour capacity analyses. Metro conducted capacity analyses of the study area intersections with existing and project - related traffic conditions. A capacity analysis is a measure of the effectiveness of how well an intersection operates and is expressed in terms of level -of- service (LOS). Level -of- service ranges from LOS "A" to LOS "F ", with LOS "A" being the best level of operation for an intersection. The analyses were conducted for the projected weekday morning and evening peak hours. Table 3 shows the projected operating capacity for each intersection. Table 3 Intersection Level -of- Serv �1?M�Peak�our� IL 47 /Somonuak St. B C B C (signalized) Spring St. /McHugh A A A A Road (unsignalized) All of the intersections operate at acceptable levels of service during both peak hours. The traffic generated by the proposed development can be accommodated by the existing intersection geometry. Currently, there is minimal traffic using Spring Street east of McHugh Road. The connection to the proposed subdivision will - significantly increase traffic volumes on Spring Street over what currently exists. However, the projected volumes do not even approach the capacity of a two lane residential street. There are no parking restrictions on existing Spring Street. Parking restrictions should be not necessary due to increases in traffic on Spring Street from the proposed Heartland Circle subdivision. At the request of the City a review of potential access to Tuma Road south of South Park Road was conducted. Tuma Road, in this area, is approximately 18 feet wide with minimal shoulders. South of South Park Road, Tuma Road has both vertical and horizontal curvature, which limits sight distance. A connection to the subdivision in this area is not recommended due to the horizontal and vertical curves and the narrow width of the roadway. The subdivision has access to Homestead drive and two future signalized intersections on US 34, additional access to US 34 is not needed. (Iu�0) Mr. Steve Roake June 14, 2002 Page 9 Also at the request of the City the location of Quinsey Lane was reviewed related to the proposed street network. Quinsey Lane is approximately 130 west of Omaha Drive.. Quinsey Lane serves a number of houses along the river and generates negligible traffic. The spacing between Quinsey Lane and proposed /existing streets is sufficient considering the minimal amount of traffic using the street. CONCLUSION The traffic generated by the proposed residential development will increase traffic on Spring Street. The analyses conducted indicate that the McHugh Road /Spring Street intersection will continue to, operate at a LOS A and the _existing LOS at the signalized intersection of IL 47 and Somonuak Street does not change with the additional residential traffic. Additional access to Tuma Road is not recommended and presents some potential safety concerns. The existing location' bf Quincy Lane is located an adequate distance from other existing /proposed cross streets. KWanparkA02Y1G10 Werta.doc November 26, 2002 City of Yorkville ATTN: Mayor Art Prohaska 804 Game Farm Rd, Yorkville, II 60560 Dear Sir, This letter is regarding the future development of the Taus farm into Heartland Circle. The developer, Richard Marker Associates proposes an access road ( Bluejay Dr.) to Tuma Rd through lot 49 of Fox River Gardens Subdivision. For the last 20 years, I have lived on lot 48 otherwise known as 176 Tuma Rd. Lots 49 and 50 of Fox River Gardens have remained vacant even though they were listed for sale several years ago. As proposed, the road right -of -way is on my eastern lot line. This places the right -of -way within 15 feet of my living room. Though this access is to be for emergencies only, I'm not naive enough not to expect this road to be opened as Tuma Rd is improved. The traffic generated by the new subdivision and by through traffic will be considerable. The potential safety hazard for myself and my family will be substantial without the proper set -back. As proposed, the right -of -way is in violation of every city and county ordinance regarding corner set - backs. There is no reason, except for profit, to jeopardize my family. There are good reasons for corner set - backs. I believe that this development should follow the ordinances. As previously demonstrated in the Phase 1 development (Heartland), Tuma Rd. access has substantial corner set -backs and provides a level of safety for the existing residents of Tuma Rd. The minimum set -back requirements should be in place during Phase 2 development (Heartland Circle.) Sincerely, Richard Stone Cc: Richard Marker Associates m� w. Cu'r're'nt Heartland Access to Tuma Rd. Page 2 Aerial View Heartland 1 Tuna Rd. Access JAW w y 4 t c 4 Current - Gray Phase 2 Example - Red Page 3 Set- • • • e: E Mal Page 4 s i• - i. ► ';r• a z •t '� Page 1 I want to explain my vote on the proposed Heartland Circle subdivision. Several weeks ago the City Council unanimously approved a new comprehensive plan. The new plan designates the area under consideration as R2, which is what the developer proposes. Twenty acres of the area, adjacent to Teri Lane, is already annexed to the city and is zoned R2. The Plan Commission has reviewed the currently proposed plan for Heartland Circle and voted to approve it. I was at the initial presentation, many months ago, when the developer appeared before the Plan Commission with his concept plan. At that meeting the chairman of the Commission complimented the proposal. He expressly stated he really liked the concept and said how pleased he was to see a plan that was not just another rehash, but one that showed originality and innovation. The plan for the development has changed considerably since then, and, in my opinion, not always for the better. But, be that as it may, the Park Board, after lengthy negotiation, also has given their approval of the subdivision. The Taus family, the current owners of the land, and long time residents of the area, stated at a public meeting that they chose this particular developer because of his past performance and their desire to leave behind a worthy legacy. R2 zoning allows for a density of 3.3 dwelling units per acre. The proposed subdivision has 262 single family lots which gives a density of 2.02 units per acre. To put that into perspective, if the subdivision had the maximum number of allowable dwelling units, there would not be 262, but 427. That's 165 more homes that could be built on this property if it came into the City not with a PUD, but was simply annexed and zoned R2 with every lot at 12000 square feet. That brings up the question of lot size. Although the average lot size in Heartland Circle is 12331 square feet, there are many lots that are less than 12,000. The smallest are just slightly more than 10,000 square feet. The reason the number of dwelling units has not increased with this reduction in lot size is that large amounts of land are given over to common green space. The proposed plan includes green areas with a trail system that can be accessed by everyone in the community, but is maintained at the subdivision's property owner's expense. That's a valuable amenity for Yorkville. The existing Heartland of Yorkville subdivision has a trail system that is already being used by Yorkville residents although the subdivision is still under construction. It's worth noting that all of the lots in Heartland of Yorkville have been sold, but it was the smaller lots that sold first, even though many of them carried a higher price tag than the larger lots. Many homeowners like the notion of green space but do not desire to maintain a large backyard. Consider someone in his sixties who may have already had a heart episode. He may be affluent, he may want to live in a single family home, but he doesn't need a large backyard to mow on hot Saturday afternoons. There are a lot of reasons why people who would be desirable neighbors might choose a smaller lot. Yorkville should not raise the drawbridge when these people approach, especially when you consider an upscale subdivision with fewer dwelling units because of community green space. Some of the subdivisions near Heartland Circle are more than ten years old some a lot older than that. This is the last large parcel in the area. There has not been a hurry to develop. This Page 2 development is not suburban sprawl. It is infill. It is patently unreasonable to assume that the property will never develop -- that the Taus family will farm forever. Look at the picture on the wall and you can see the farms that were sold and developed so that many of the objectors to Heartland Circle could buy homes there. How many know that property owners in the Wackerlin subdivision objected to the development of Teri Lane? They didn't want small lots backing up to their large well and septic lots. They didn't want a subdivision with that density built next to their's. There are as many as five lots on the west side of Teri Lane that abut a single lot in Wackerlin. They brought their objections to the City Council, but the Council back then allowed the Teri Lane subdivision to be built. You can also see the older homes of long time residents near Route 47 in the picture. I'm told that they too had objections when Prairie Park went in. The idea of "I'm here, raise the drawbridge" is not a new one. The old comprehensive plan showed Spring Street continuing east and crossing the Fox River. If this plan were ever implemented, imagine the traffic Spring Street would see. Heartland Circle precludes that possibility. A traffic study was done by Metro Traffic that states the additional traffic flow can be handled by existing streets. Consider these facts: The intersection of McHugh and Route 34 has been straightened and will be signalized. Landmark Drive and Route 47 has been signalized. Game Farm Road and Route 34 will soon be signalized. Drivers will make adjustments and find the most expeditious route for them. That's what they always do. Of course a few hundred more cars will be on the streets. That only sounds like a lot until you compare it to the 40000 or so cars and semis that move on Route 47 every day and we all manage to pull out onto Route 47. There are other reasons for my yes vote for Heartland Circle, like the $140,000 in "not required" fees that the developer is willing to pay the School District, and the fact that Richard Marker Associates is now a local business and the homes in the subdivision are being built by local builders, using local subcontractors and suppliers. I see Heartland of Yorkville as an attractive upscale subdivision and I believe that Heartland Circle will be as well.