Loading...
Economic Development Packet 2019 08-06-19 AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, August 6, 2019 6:00 p.m. City Hall Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL Citizen Comments: Minutes for Correction/Approval: July 2, 2019 New Business: 1. EDC 2019-59 Building Permit Report for June 2019 2. EDC 2019-60 Building Inspection Report for June 2019 3. EDC 2019-61 Property Maintenance Report for June 2019 4. EDC 2019-62 Economic Development Report for July 2019 5. EDC 2019-63 Lenny’s Gas N Wash – Special Use, Sign Variance, and Final Plat 6. EDC 2019-64 208 E. Main Street – Front Yard Setback Variance 7. EDC 2019-65 Tactical Urbanism 8. EDC 2019-66 Downtown Landscape Hill Project – Invitation to Bid 9. EDC 2019-67 Kane/Kendall Council of Mayors Bike Sharing – Memorandum of Understanding 10. EDC 2019-68 Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) – Change Order 11. EDC 2019-69 Old Jail Term Sheet Old Business: 1. EDC 2019-23 Downtown Form-Based Code and Streetscape Master Plan Additional Business: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 www.yorkville.il.us Economic Development Agenda August 6, 2019 Page 2 2019/2020 City Council Goals – Economic Development Committee Goal Priority Staff “Southside Development” 4 Bart Olson, Krysti Barksdale-Noble & Lynn Dubajic “Downtown and Riverfront Development” 5 Bart Olson, Tim Evans & Krysti Barksdale-Noble “Metra Extension” 7 Bart Olson, Rob Fredrickson, Eric Dhuse, Krysti Barksdale-Noble & Erin Willrett “Manufacturing and Industrial Development” 8 (tie) Bart Olson, Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Erin Willrett, Lynn Dubajic, Eric Dhuse & Brad Sanderson “Expand Economic Development Efforts” 10 Krysti Barksdale-Noble & Lynn Dubajic “Revenue Growth” 13 Rob Fredrickson, Krysti Barksdale-Noble & Lynn Dubajic “Entrance Signage” 17 Krysti Barksdale-Noble & Erin Willrett UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, August 6, 2019 6:00 PM CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. July 2, 2019 □ Approved __________ □ As presented □ With corrections --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2019-59 Building Permit Report for June 2019 □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. EDC 2019-60 Building Inspection Report for June 2019 □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. EDC 2019-61 Property Maintenance Report for June 2019 □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. EDC 2019-62 Economic Development Report for July 2019 □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. EDC 2019-63 Lenny’s Gas N Wash – Special Use, Sign Variance, and Final Plat □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. EDC 2019-64 208 E. Main Street – Front Yard Setback Variance □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. EDC 2019-65 Tactical Urbanism □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. EDC 2019-66 Downtown Landscape Hill Project – Invitation to Bid □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. EDC 2019-67 Kane/Kendall Council of Mayors Bike Sharing Memorandum of Understanding □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. EDC 2019-68 Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) – Change Order □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. EDC 2019-69 Old Jail Term Sheet □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OLD BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2019-23 Downtown Form-Based Code and Streetscape Master Plan □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Minutes Tracking Number Minutes of the Economic Development Committee – July 2, 2019 Economic Development Committee – August 6, 2019 Majority Committee Approval Minute Taker Name Department Page 1 of 2 DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, July 2, 2019, 6:00pm City Conference Room In Attendance: Committee Members Chairman Jackie Milschewski Alderman Joel Frieders Alderman Ken Koch Absent: Alderman Jason Peterson Other City Officials Mayor John Purcell (arr. 6:03pm) City Administrator Bart Olson Community Development Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble Senior Planner Jason Engberg Code Official Pete Ratos Other Guests Lynn Dubajic, City Consultant Katie Finlon, Kendall County Record The meeting was called to order at 6:00pm by Chairman Jackie Milschewski Citizen Comments: None Minutes for Correction/Approval: June 4, 2019 The minutes were approved as presented. New Business 1. EDC 2019-54 Building Permit Report for May 2019 Mr. Ratos said there were 17 single family detached and 5 single family attached for a total of 128 permits for the month. 2. EDC 2019-55 Building Inspection Report for May 2019 There were 389 inspections for the month and most were residential, said Mr. Ratos. 3. EDC 2019-56 Property Maintenance Report for May 2019 Eight cases were heard in May. Mr. Ratos said the hotel under construction was found liable for no silt fence, open manholes and other violations. Mayor Purcell said he received complaints about dumping in a vacant lot preventing the owner from mowing. Mr. Ratos advised the actions that could be taken by the owner. Page 2 of 2 4. EDC 2019-57 Economic Development Report for June 2019 Ms. Dubajic reported the following: 1. The Roadhouse in Fountain Village is expected to be re-opened by a new group of people who will take over the lease and possibly keep the name. 2. The Pinheadz building is bank-owned and the business is in receivership. The bank also owns a similar property in Richton Park and both properties would both have to be purchased. If it goes into foreclosure the properties can be split. 3. Popeye's is still planning on a freestanding building. 5. EDC 2019-58 Accessory Structures and Uses – Text Amendment Ms. Noble explained the reason for this amendment and said a resident asked to build a basketball court on their adjoining lot. Their home is one lot and the other lot is for extra space. She said the code was not clear on accessory structures when there was no home on the second lot. Staff decided to revise the code and also researched policies from other communities before suggesting a change in language to be incorporated. The owner will only be allowed one accessory structure and will be required to put in sidewalk and trees prior to the permanent accessory structure. This matter will go to Public Hearing at PZC on July 10th and then to City Council for final approval. Alderman Koch noted in Ward I there are 3 properties like this and one does not have a sidewalk. Mr. Ratos noted that when developers sell adjoining lots, they stipulate the sidewalk must be completed for both. Old Business 1. EDC 2019-23 Downtown Form-Based Code and Streetscape Master Plan Ms. Noble said staff had addressed several comments received at last month's meeting and there was brief discussion regarding those comments including overhead lighting. Ms. Noble said 400 people also responded with suggestions for the downtown. Mr. Olson said the purpose of the plan was to pre-load the properties so a permit could easily be pulled and approved in the future. This matter will be brought back in August (or September) to discuss potential downtown uses based on sample buildings on certain properties. Additional Business There was no further business and the meeting adjourned at 6:26pm Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #1 Tracking Number EDC 2019-59 Building Permit Report for June 2019 Economic Development Committee – August 6, 2019 N/A N/A N/A Informational None All permits issued in June 2019. D. Weinert Community Development Name Department C:\Users\jbehland\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\FHT11SZI\June 2019.doc prepared by D Weinert UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUILDING PERMIT REPORT June 2019 TYPES OF PERMITS Number of Permits Issued SFD Single Family Detached B.U.I.L.D Single Family Detached SFA Single Family Attached Multi- Family Apartments Condominiums Commercial Includes all Permits Issued for Commercial Use Industrial Misc. Construction Cost Permit Fees June 2019 240 9 0 0 0 11 0 220 3,314,915.00 125,499.42 Calendar Year 2019 650 74 0 10 0 62 0 504 24,512,878.00 950,158.73 Fiscal Year 2020 369 26 0 5 0 19 0 319 7,042,898.00 340,829.01 June 2018 123 30 0 0 0 11 0 81 61,748,401.00 248,887.93 Calendar Year 2018 543 90 14 36 0 79 0 324 31,278,361.00 1,521,112.55 Fiscal Year 2019 237 48 0 0 0 23 0 166 14,925,169.00 430,762.49 June 2017 92 2 13 0 0 8 0 69 16,688,860.00 559,688.70 Calendar Year 2017 452 27 49 0 0 71 0 305 31,577,273.00 1,343,479.34 Fiscal Year 2018 219 11 21 0 0 27 0 160 20,983,929.00 759,269.81 June 2016 109 0 15 0 0 13 0 81 4,490,566.00 196,837.61 Calendar Year 2016 430 14 53 0 0 64 0 299 18,502,673.00 845,806.19 Fiscal Year 2017 209 7 23 0 0 23 0 156 10,020,497.00 382,404.85 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #2 Tracking Number EDC 2019-60 Building Inspection Report for June 2019 Economic Development Committee – August 6, 2019 N/A N/A N/A Informational None All inspections scheduled in June 2019. D. Weinert Community Development Name Department DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF _____ 034-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 20170655 577 E KENDALL DR 4&5 06/18/2019Comments1: NORTH SIDE, HOLIDAY INN (INSPECTORS NOTEComments2: S: TWO 3" PVC PIPES FOR COMED)EEI _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20170928 3152 MATLOCK DR 671 06/27/2019Comments1: N - RED POINTE MAPLE 3.2" NOT APPROVED TComments2: REE. S - RED POINTE MAPLE 2.9" NOT APPROComments3: VED TREE.PR _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170934 3168 MATLOCK DR 667 06/10/2019PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/10/2019EEI _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 06/10/2019EEI _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20170939 3147 MATLOCK DR 655 06/20/2019Comments1: GREENSPIRE LINDEN NOT ON APPROVED LIST,Comments2: INLET BASKET TO BE REMOVED IN REAR, SURFComments3: ACE DAMAGE ON SIDEWALK TO BE REPLACEDPR _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170940 3177 MATLOCK DR 661 06/10/2019PR _____ 017-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/10/2019EEI _____ 018-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 06/10/2019BC _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170964 1942 RENA LN 10 06/12/2019PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/12/2019BC _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/27/2019BC _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170965 1944 RENA LN 10 06/12/2019PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/12/2019BC _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/27/2019BC _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170966 1946 RENA LN 10 06/12/2019PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/12/2019BC _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/27/2019BC _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170967 1948 RENA LN 10 06/12/2019PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/12/2019 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/27/2019BC _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170968 1952 RENA LN 10 06/12/2019PR _____ 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/12/2019BC _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/27/2019BC _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170969 1954 RENA LN 10 06/12/2019PR _____ 017-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/12/2019BC _____ 018-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/27/2019BC _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170970 1968 RENA LN 9 06/13/2019PR _____ 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/13/2019BF _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/28/2019Comments1: NUMEROUS ITEMS FAILED - REFER TO INSPECTComments2: ION SHEETPBF _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/28/2019Comments1: NUMEROUS ITEMS FAILED - REFER TO INSPECTComments2: ION SHEETBC _____ 013-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170971 1966 RENA LN 9 06/13/2019PR _____ 014-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/13/2019BF _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/28/2019Comments1: NUMEROUS ITEMS FAILED - REFER TO INSPECTComments2: ION SHEETPBF _____ 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/28/2019Comments1: NUMEROUS ITEMS FAILED - REFER TO INSPECTComments2: ION SHEETBC _____ 013-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170972 1974 RENA LN 9 06/13/2019PR _____ 014-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/13/2019BF _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/28/2019Comments1: NUMEROUS ITEMS FAILED - REFER TO INSPECTComments2: ION SHEETPBF _____ 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/28/2019Comments1: NUMEROUS ITEMS FAILED - REFER TO INSPECTComments2: ION SHEET DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 012-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170973 1962 RENA LN 9 06/13/2019PR _____ 013-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/13/2019BF _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/28/2019Comments1: NUMEROUS ITEMS FAILED - REFER TO INSPECTComments2: ION SHEETPBF _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/28/2019Comments1: NUMEROUS ITEMS FAILED - REFER TO INSPECTComments2: ION SHEETBC _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170974 1972 RENA LN 9 06/13/2019PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/13/2019BF _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/28/2019Comments1: NUMEROUS ITEMS FAILED - REFER TO INSPECTComments2: ION SHEETPBF _____ 017-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/28/2019Comments1: NUMEROUS ITEMS FAILED - REFER TO INSPECTComments2: ION SHEETBC _____ 012-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20170975 1964 RENA LN 9 06/13/2019PR _____ 013-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/13/2019BF _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/28/2019Comments1: NUMEROUS ITEMS FAILED - REFER TO INSPECTComments2: ION SHEETPBF _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/28/2019Comments1: NUMEROUS ITEMS FAILED - REFER TO INSPECTComments2: ION SHEETBF _____ 023-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20170994 967 N CARLY CIR 124 06/13/2019Comments1: RUAN, BBWEEI _____ 024-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 06/27/2019Comments1: PARKWAY TREE NOT ON APPROVED LIST. DAMAGComments2: ED SIDEWALKBF _____ 021-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20180158 1012 S CARLY CIR 113 06/13/2019Comments1: RUAN, BBWBF _____ PM 009-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20180330 3126 MATLOCK DR 677 06/17/2019Comments1: UPLAND CANCELLED DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180331 3122 MATLOCK DR 679 06/17/2019BC _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/17/2019BC _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 06/17/2019PR _____ 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 06/17/2019BC _____ 012-INS INSULATION 06/19/2019BF _____ 013-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 06/17/2019EEI _____ 019-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20180335 3101 MATLOCK DR 635 06/27/2019Comments1: REMOVE REAR INLET BASKET. N AMERICAN SENComments2: TRY LINDEN 2.3" . GRADING/SOD PITCHED TOComments3: WARD SW HOLDING WATER. SW ADA & SURFACEComments4: DAMAGE.BF _____ 013-STP STOOP 20180336 3106 MATLOCK DR 681 06/18/2019BF _____ 014-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 06/28/2019Comments1: UPLANDEEI _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20180360 3132 MATLOCK DR 675 06/20/2019Comments1: GREENSPIRE LINDEN MEASURED 2.3" - NOT APComments2: PROVED TREEEEI _____ 020-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20180362 3105 MATLOCK DR 636 06/27/2019Comments1: SWAMP WHITE OAK 2.3"BC _____ 013-STP STOOP 20180364 3102 MATLOCK DR 682 06/04/2019BF _____ 014-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 06/28/2019Comments1: UPLANDEEI _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20180366 3173 MATLOCK DR 660 06/20/2019Comments1: REDMOND LINDEN MEASURED 2.1", AUX UB BURComments2: IED, REMOVE INLET BASKET IN REAREEI _____ 021-REI REINSPECTION 20180386 2505 LYMAN LOOP 78 06/03/2019Comments1: ONE SQUARE OF SIDEWALK DAMAGED, MUST BEComments2: REPLACEDBC _____ 011-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180463 512 E MAIN ST 2 06/20/2019BF _____ 020-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20180466 971 S CARLY CIR 91 06/13/2019Comments1: RUAN, BBW DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF _____ 018-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20180467 946 N CARLY CIR 54 06/13/2019Comments1: RUAN, BBWBC _____ 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180515 1149 HOMESTEAD DR 138 06/25/2019EEI _____ 014-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20180546 3166 MATLOCK DR 668 06/28/2019Comments1: MARMO MAPLE NOT APPROVED TREE. BURIED SAComments2: NITARY STRUCTURE. SURFACE DAMAGE ON SW.BF _____ PM 015-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20180547 3124 MATLOCK DR 678 06/17/2019Comments1: UPLANDEEI _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20180548 3128 MATLOCK DR 676 06/27/2019Comments1: RED POINTE MAPLE 2.4" NOT APPROVED TREE.Comments2: DAMAGED SW.BC _____ 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180583 110 E KENDALL DR 06/19/2019Comments1: GATE LATCH TO REMAIN LOCKED WHEN POOL ISComments2: NOT IN USEEEI _____ 020-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20180593 2628 MCLELLAN BLVD 58 06/03/2019Comments1: TEMP TO FULLEEI _____ 022-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20180594 2631 BURR ST 81 06/03/2019Comments1: TEMP TO FINALBC _____ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20180673 911 PURCELL ST 65 06/14/2019EEI _____ 016-REI REINSPECTION 20180720 2843 KETCHUM CT 219 06/28/2019BC _____ 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180729 1973 MEADOWLARK LN 121 06/21/2019BF _____ 017-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 20180738 3101 LAUREN DR 93 06/13/2019Comments1: CAL, MIDWESTBC _____ 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180767 1845 ASTER DR 95 06/10/2019EEI _____ 020-REI REINSPECTION 20180794 978 S CARLY CIR 107 06/28/2019BF _____ 025-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20180826 3171 LAUREN DR 86 06/13/2019Comments1: ADA RAMP, CAL, MIDWESTPR _____ 013-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180854 1131 GRACE DR 62 06/12/2019PR _____ 014-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/12/2019EEI _____ 015-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 06/12/2019 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 010-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180873 211 E SPRING ST 06/27/2019Comments1: GUARD EXPOSED ROMEX IN BSMT FROM BOXES UComments2: P. FLUSH ALL OUTLETS AND SQUARE THEM. REComments3: PAIR GFCI IN GARAGE. CONDUIT AROUND POWEComments4: R TO A/C UNITS.BF _____ 019-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 20180885 3301 LAUREN DR 80 06/03/2019Comments1: MIDWESTPR _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20180936 1901 WREN RD 13 06/20/2019PR _____ 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/20/2019EEI _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 06/21/2019Comments1: REMOVE REAR INLET BASKET, MARMO MAPLE NOComments2: T ON APPROVED LISTBF _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180964 3101 REHBEHN CT 637 06/04/2019Comments1: DR HORTONBF _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/04/2019BF _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 06/04/2019PR _____ 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 06/04/2019BC _____ 012-INS INSULATION 06/06/2019BF _____ 013-STP STOOP 06/18/2019Comments1: UPLANDBF _____ 014-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 06/27/2019Comments1: UPLANDBF _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180966 3105 REHBEHN CT 638 06/24/2019BF _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/24/2019BF _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 06/24/2019PR _____ 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 06/24/2019BF _____ 012-INS INSULATION 06/26/2019Comments1: HORTON, GRBF _____ 010-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180968 3109 REHBEHN CT 639 06/21/2019BF _____ 011-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/21/2019 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF _____ 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 06/21/2019PR _____ 013-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 06/21/2019BF _____ 014-INS INSULATION 06/26/2019Comments1: GR - DR HORTONBC _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180969 3121 REHBEHN CT 640 06/07/2019BC _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/07/2019BC _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 06/07/2019PR _____ 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 06/07/2019BC _____ 012-INS INSULATION 06/11/2019BF _____ 009-BGS BASEMENT GARAGE STOOPS 20180970 3122 REHBEHN CT 648 06/18/2019Comments1: UPLANDBC _____ 007-BGS BASEMENT GARAGE STOOPS 20180971 3125 REHBEHN CT 641 06/04/2019BF _____ 010-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20180972 3126 REHBEHN CT 647 06/13/2019BF _____ 011-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/13/2019BF _____ 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 06/13/2019PR _____ 013-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 06/13/2019BC _____ 014-INS INSULATION 06/17/2019BF _____ 015-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 06/18/2019Comments1: UPLAND, STOOPS & GAR FLOORBF _____ 016-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 06/28/2019Comments1: UPLANDBF _____ PM 014-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20180974 3132 REHBEHN CT 646 06/17/2019Comments1: UPLANDBC _____ 007-BGS BASEMENT GARAGE STOOPS 20180975 3133 REHBEHN CT 643 06/05/2019BF _____ 007-BGS BASEMENT GARAGE STOOPS 20180977 3137 REHBEHN CT 644 06/12/2019Comments1: UPLAND, GRANDE RESERVEBC _____ 019-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20181003 3162 LAUREN DR 113 06/14/2019 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 012-SUM SUMP 20181004 2581 LYMAN LOOP 37 06/04/2019BF _____ AM 013-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 06/20/2019Comments1: COX, GRBC _____ PM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20181012 211 E SPRING ST 06/28/2019Comments1: FURNACE & A/CEEI _____ 019-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20181019 4210 E MILLBROOK CIR 289 06/03/2019BF _____ 014-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20181025 1101 BLACKBERRY SHORE LN 44 06/03/2019Comments1: RANDABF _____ 013-PWK PRIVATE WALKS 20181026 901 BLACKBERRY SHORE LN 24 06/03/2019Comments1: RANDA GROUPPR _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20190001 938 PURCELL ST 82 06/06/2019PR _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/06/2019PR _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 06/06/2019PR _____ 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 06/06/2019BF _____ 012-INS INSULATION 06/13/2019Comments1: BBW, MEADOWBROOKBC _____ AM 013-STP STOOP 06/24/2019BF _____ 019-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 20190002 3258 BOOMBAH BLVD 140 06/13/2019Comments1: CAL, MIDWESTBF _____ AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190007 4510 GARDINER AVE 1138 06/04/2019BC _____ AM 012-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20190016 991 BLACKBERRY SHORE LN 33 06/21/2019BC _____ AM 013-STP STOOP 06/21/2019BC _____ 014-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20190017 1093 REDWOOD DR 47 06/17/2019BC _____ AM 001-ELU ELECTRICAL - UNDERSLAB 20190028 1652 N BEECHER RD 54 06/18/2019Comments1: TRENCHBF _____ 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 06/26/2019Comments1: TARGET - JOEL 812-371-4784BF _____ 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/26/2019Comments1: TARGET, FITTING ROOMS 812-371-4784 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------EEI _____ 020-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20190030 4351 E MILLBROOK CIR 209 06/03/2019BF _____ 015-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 20190032 3291 LAUREN DR 81 06/03/2019Comments1: MIDWESTBF _____ 012-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20190033 3251 LAUREN DR 83 06/03/2019Comments1: MIDWESTPR _____ 013-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/14/2019PR _____ 014-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/14/2019PR _____ 015-REI REINSPECTION 06/17/2019Comments1: FINALSPR _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190035 2683 MCLELLAN BLVD 49 06/10/2019PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/10/2019EEI _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 06/13/2019EEI _____ 017-REI REINSPECTION 06/27/2019PR _____ PM 014-SUM SUMP 20190036 2692 MCLELLAN BLVD 51 06/18/2019PR _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/25/2019PR _____ 008-SUM SUMP 20190040 2577 LYMAN LOOP 36 06/18/2019PR _____ 013-SUM SUMP 20190043 2583 LYMAN LOOP 38 06/04/2019PR _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/19/2019PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/19/2019EEI _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 06/24/2019BC _____ 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190049 433 E BARBERRY CIR 153 06/17/2019BC _____ 005-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190055 2393 AUTUMN CREEK BLVD 269 06/05/2019BF _____ AM 014-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20190060 2445 WYTHE PL 6 06/07/2019Comments1: WINDETT, COMEXPR _____ 015-SUM SUMP 06/19/2019EEI _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 06/24/2019 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/24/2019PR _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/24/2019EEI _____ 019-REI REINSPECTION 06/27/2019BF _____ AM 014-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20190061 2451 WYTHE PL 7 06/07/2019Comments1: WINDETT, COMEXBC _____ 006-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20190064 981 BLACKBERRY SHORE LN 32 06/06/2019BC _____ 007-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/06/2019BC _____ 008-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 06/06/2019PR _____ 009-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 06/06/2019BC _____ 010-INS INSULATION 06/17/2019Comments1: BASEMENT PERIMETER NOT COMPLETE CHECK ONComments2: FINALBC _____ 011-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 06/25/2019BC _____ 012-STP STOOP 06/25/2019BF _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20190066 2835 KETCHUM CT 217 06/18/2019Comments1: RYAN, GRBF _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/18/2019Comments1: INSPECTION NOTES: ALL ELECTRIC BOXES NEEComments2: D TO BE AIR TIGHT, CEILING BOXES NEED TOComments3: BE DONEBF _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 06/18/2019PR _____ 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 06/18/2019BC _____ 012-INS INSULATION 06/20/2019BF _____ 014-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 20190067 3192 LAUREN DR 06/13/2019Comments1: CAL MIDWESTEEI _____ 015-REI REINSPECTION 06/27/2019PR _____ 013-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190085 2828 KETCHUM CT 215 06/10/2019PR _____ 014-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/10/2019 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------EEI _____ 014-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20190086 2847 KETCHUM CT 220 06/24/2019PR _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/26/2019PR _____ 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/26/2019EEI _____ 017-REI REINSPECTION 06/26/2019BF _____ 012-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190089 1941 WREN RD 17 06/12/2019Comments1: PUBLIC WALK & STOOPS UPLANDBC _____ 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20190100 501 OMAHA DR 3 06/04/2019Comments1: REINSPECTIONBC _____ 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 06/04/2019Comments1: REINSPECTIONBC _____ 013-INS INSULATION 06/06/2019BC _____ 014-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 06/24/2019BC _____ 015-STP STOOP 06/24/2019BC _____ 002-TRN TRENCH - (GAS, ELECTRIC, 20190104 1482 WALSH DR 193 06/03/2019BC _____ AM 013-STP STOOP 20190105 800 ALEXANDRA LN 20 06/27/2019BC _____ 014-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 06/27/2019Comments1: PATIOPR _____ 014-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190114 2821 SILVER SPRINGS CT 245 06/19/2019PR _____ 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 06/19/2019EEI _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 06/21/2019BC _____ AM 002-FTG FOOTING 20190115 3168 BOOMBAH BLVD 130 06/06/2019Comments1: MIDWESTBC _____ PM 003-FOU FOUNDATION 06/10/2019BF _____ 004-BKF BACKFILL 06/17/2019Comments1: MIDWESTBF _____ 005-BGS BASEMENT GARAGE STOOPS 06/20/2019Comments1: NOT READY TO POURPR _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 06/20/2019 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 007-BGS BASEMENT GARAGE STOOPS 06/20/2019BC _____ 008-STP STOOP 06/21/2019BC _____ pm 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 20190130 1112 CARLY DR 26 06/07/2019BC _____ 007-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 06/19/2019Comments1: ADD HURRICANE TIES TO RAFTERS/JOISTS ONComments2: REAR PORCH. REINSPECT WITH INSULATION.BC _____ 008-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/19/2019BC _____ 009-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 06/19/2019PR _____ 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 06/19/2019BC _____ PM 011-INS INSULATION 06/21/2019BC _____ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20190134 2636 BURR ST 12 06/10/2019Comments1: CANCEL DUE TO STORM DAMAGEPR _____ 008-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20190160 2799 GAINS CT 195 06/12/2019BC _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/12/2019BC _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 06/12/2019BC _____ 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 06/12/2019BC _____ 012-INS INSULATION 06/14/2019BF _____ AM 013-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 06/21/2019BC _____ 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190162 229 WALSH CIR 40 06/06/2019Comments1: SHEDBC _____ 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20190182 2411 ALAN DALE LN 134 06/14/2019PR _____ 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20190183 2544 MADDEN CT 11 06/21/2019PR _____ 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/21/2019PR _____ 003-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 06/21/2019BF _____ AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 20190190 4376 E MILLBROOK CIR 269 06/03/2019Comments1: MIDWESTPR _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 06/07/2019 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ AM 006-BGS BASEMENT GARAGE STOOPS 06/10/2019PR _____ AM 007-WAT WATER 06/25/2019BC _____ AM 006-BG BASEMENT AND GARAGE FLOOR 20190193 272 WINDETT RIDGE RD 17 06/11/2019PR _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20190199 875 PURCELL ST 71 06/17/2019BF _____ 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 06/25/2019BC _____ 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190203 478 HONEYSUCKLE LN 160 06/06/2019Comments1: IRC APP G AG105.0(8) ACCESS GATE MUST BEComments2: SELF CLOSING/LATCHING WITH NO OPENING LComments3: ARGER THAN 1/2" WITHIN 18" OF RELEASE MEComments4: CHANISM. GARES NOT 48" TALL, MEASURED FRBC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190212 310 ILLINI DR 10 06/19/2019BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190217 1979 MEADOWLARK LN 118 06/11/2019BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190218 2422 FITZHUGH TURN 146 06/03/2019Comments1: DECKBC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190221 1538 SIENNA DR 76 06/03/2019BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190222 114 CONOVER CT 11 06/19/2019Comments1: GATE LATCHES MUST BE AT LEAST 54" ABOVEComments2: GRADE, CURRENTLY AT 36"BC _____ AM 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190232 2929 GRANDE TR 381 06/11/2019Comments1: EARLY AMBC _____ 003-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20190243 1121 BLACKBERRY SHORE LN 46 06/14/2019BC _____ 004-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/14/2019BC _____ AM 005-INS INSULATION 06/21/2019BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190245 131 E HYDRAULIC AVE 06/14/2019BC _____ 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190250 3183 MATLOCK DR 662 06/13/2019PR _____ AM 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20190255 841 OMAHA DR 20 06/21/2019BC _____ PM 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 06/24/2019BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190260 114 CONOVER CT 11 06/19/2019 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ AM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20190263 2056 HEARTHSTONE AVE 342 06/04/2019BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/11/2019BF _____ 007-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20190265 2785 GAINS CT 191 06/25/2019Comments1: GR- RYANBF _____ 008-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/25/2019BF _____ 009-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 06/25/2019PR _____ 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 06/25/2019BF _____ 011-INS INSULATION 06/27/2019Comments1: GRPR _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20190266 832 ALEXANDRA LN 36 06/10/2019BC _____ 006-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 06/14/2019BC _____ 007-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 06/14/2019BC _____ 008-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 06/14/2019PR _____ 009-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 06/14/2019BF _____ 010-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 06/14/2019Comments1: MARKER, HMDBF _____ 011-INS INSULATION 06/19/2019Comments1: MARKER, HMDBC _____ PM 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190271 861 PRAIRIE CROSSING DR 172 06/25/2019BC _____ 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20190272 2322 WINTERTHUR GREEN 178 06/27/2019BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20190276 3271 LAUREN DR 82 06/06/2019BC _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 06/11/2019BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 06/17/2019BF _____ 004-BGS BASEMENT GARAGE STOOPS 06/20/2019Comments1: NOT READY TO POURPR _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 06/20/2019BC _____ PM 006-BGS BASEMENT GARAGE STOOPS 06/20/2019Comments1: CRAWL DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 007-STP STOOP 06/21/2019BC _____ 003-FOU FOUNDATION 20190279 1992 MEADOWLARK LN 143 06/05/2019BC _____ 004-BKF BACKFILL 06/10/2019Comments1: NORWOOD, COUNTRY HILLSBF _____ AM 005-BKF BACKFILL 20190287 709 CLOVER CT 5 06/05/2019Comments1: RSSBC _____ PM 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190289 711 KENTSHIRE DR 134 06/20/2019BC _____ AM 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190290 2943 GRANDE TR 383 06/11/2019Comments1: EARLY AM - PATIOBC _____ 003-TRN TRENCH - (GAS, ELECTRIC, 20190291 1991 MEADOWLARK LN 113 06/04/2019PR _____ 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 20190292 1455 CRIMSON LN 222-1 06/05/2019PR _____ 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 20190293 1453 CRIMSON LN 222-2 06/05/2019PR _____ 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 20190294 1451 CRIMSON LN 222-3 06/05/2019PR _____ 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 20190295 1449 CRIMSON LN 222-4 06/05/2019PR _____ 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 20190296 1447 CRIMSON LN 222-5 06/05/2019BF _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20190302 2037 SQUIRE CIR 208 06/14/2019Comments1: MIDWEST, GRBF _____ PM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 06/21/2019Comments1: MIDWESTBF _____ AM 003-BKF BACKFILL 06/25/2019PR _____ 005-WAT WATER 06/27/2019PR _____ 006-WAT WATER 06/28/2019BC _____ PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20190303 2052 SQUIRE CIR 190 06/06/2019BC _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 06/10/2019BC _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 06/12/2019PR _____ 004-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 06/14/2019Comments1: NOT READY DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 005-WAT WATER 06/14/2019Comments1: NOT READYPR _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 06/20/2019PR _____ 007-REI REINSPECTION 06/18/2019Comments1: WATER/STORMBF _____ AM 008-BGS BASEMENT GARAGE STOOPS 06/21/2019Comments1: GR-RYANBC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190309 503 SUTTON ST 212 06/10/2019Comments1: RECEPTACLEBC _____ 001-TRN TRENCH - (GAS, ELECTRIC, 20190311 2867 MCMURTRIE WAY 06/27/2019BC _____ PM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20190312 2651 MCLELLAN BLVD 46 06/05/2019BF _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 20190320 2078 SQUIRE CIR 182 06/07/2019Comments1: MIDWEST, GRPR _____ 003-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 06/17/2019PR _____ AM 004-WAT WATER 06/11/2019PR _____ 005-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 06/11/2019BC _____ 006-BKF BACKFILL 06/12/2019BF 13:00 007-BGS BASEMENT GARAGE STOOPS 06/17/2019Comments1: MIDWEST, GRBC _____ 002-FTG FOOTING 20190321 4262 E MILLBROOK CIR 282 06/03/2019BC _____ PM 003-FOU FOUNDATION 06/05/2019PR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 06/14/2019BC _____ AM 005-BKF BACKFILL 06/11/2019BF 13:00 006-BGS BASEMENT GARAGE STOOPS 06/17/2019Comments1: MIDWEST, GRPR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20190322 2782 GAINS CT 188 06/10/2019BC _____ AM 005-BGS BASEMENT GARAGE STOOPS 06/10/2019PR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20190323 1952 WREN RD 6 06/05/2019 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 005-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 06/06/2019BF _____ 006-BG BASEMENT AND GARAGE FLOOR 06/07/2019Comments1: LATE AM, PRESTWICK UPLANDPR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20190324 1921 WREN RD 15 06/05/2019PR _____ 005-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 06/06/1929BC _____ 006-BG BASEMENT AND GARAGE FLOOR 06/13/2019Comments1: UPLAND, PRESTWICKBC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190327 4433 PLEASANT COURT 06/10/2019BC _____ AM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20190338 1847 COLUMBINE DR 71 06/11/2019PR _____ PM 001-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 20190340 976 S CARLY CIR 106 06/30/2019BC _____ 002-FTG FOOTING 06/06/2019Comments1: MCCUEBF _____ 003-FOU FOUNDATION 06/13/2019Comments1: MCCUE, BBWBF _____ PM 004-BKF BACKFILL 06/19/2019Comments1: MCCUE, BBWBC 14:30 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190345 1201 WILLOW WAY 202 06/07/2019Comments1: ABOVE GROUND POOLBC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190346 587 W BARBERRY CIR 06/04/2019BC _____ 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190347 1533 CORAL DR 171 06/10/2019PR _____ PM 001-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 20190351 834 ALEXANDRA LN 37 06/03/2019BF _____ AM 002-FTG FOOTING 06/05/2019BF _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 06/14/2019Comments1: MARKER, HMDBC _____ 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20190355 2778 GOLDENROD DR 254 06/13/2019BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190356 3153 MATLOCK DR 656 06/24/2019Comments1: FENCE WK OF 6/24/19BC _____ AM 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190359 493 KELLY AVE 109 06/07/2019Comments1: PATIO INSPECTION NOTES: PIN PATIO TO FOUComments2: NDATION USING #4 OR LARGER REBAR AT 30"Comments3: INTERVALS BEFORE POURING DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC 11:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190361 1008 JOHN ST 06/05/2019BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/13/2019BC _____ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20190364 2988 ELLSWORTH DR 348 06/12/2019Comments1: LATE AMBC _____ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20190369 2623 BURR ST 80 06/11/2019BF _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20190371 2858 CRYDER WAY 445 06/05/2019BF _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 06/12/2019Comments1: R&J CONC, GRANDE RESERVEBF _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 06/17/2019Comments1: R & J CONC, GRPR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 06/20/2019BC _____ 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20190376 838 GREENFIELD TURN 152 06/10/2019BC _____ 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 06/12/2019BC _____ 002-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20190377 722 KENTSHIRE DR 118 06/04/2019Comments1: LANDINGBC _____ 003-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 06/04/2019BC _____ 004-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/11/2019BF _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20190380 2684 PATRIOT CT 221 06/24/2019Comments1: GR - RYANBF _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 06/27/2019Comments1: GR RYANPR _____ AM 001-WAT WATER 20190381 2792 GAINS CT 186 06/11/2019BF _____ AM 002-FTG FOOTING 06/13/2019Comments1: MIDWESTBF _____ PM 003-FOU FOUNDATION 06/19/2019Comments1: MIDWEST GRBF _____ AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 06/21/2019Comments1: GR- RYANPR _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 06/28/2019 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF _____ 006-REI REINSPECTION 06/24/2019Comments1: BACKFILLBC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20190384 1991 WREN RD 22 06/10/2019BF _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 06/12/2019Comments1: UPLANDBF _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 06/17/2019Comments1: UPLANDPR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 06/26/2019BF _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20190386 1942 WREN RD 5 06/07/2019Comments1: UPLAND, PRESTWICKBC _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 06/11/2019BF _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 06/17/2019Comments1: UPLANDPR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 06/26/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190396 111 N CONOVER CT 06/03/2019BC _____ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20190405 3333 CALEDONIA DR 19 06/10/2019Comments1: CANCEL DUE TO STORM DAMAGEBF _____ 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190406 216 LEISURE ST B 103 06/28/2019Comments1: DRIVE, PATIO W/WALK CHUY 630-330-7580PR _____ 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190418 508 CENTER PKWY 6B 06/06/2019PR _____ 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190419 508 CENTER PKWY 6B 06/06/2019BC _____ 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190421 732 KENTSHIRE DR 117 06/03/2019BC _____ 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190422 2511 EMERALD LN 122 06/26/2019BC _____ 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20190423 1282 SPRING ST 189 06/17/2019Comments1: NEED RESUBMIT PLANS, RE SCHEDULEBC _____ 002-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 06/27/2019BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190427 4572 HARRISON ST 1116 06/18/2019Comments1: ROOFBC _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20190429 2435 FAIRFAX WAY 242 06/06/2019Comments1: DECK DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 06/18/2019PR _____ PM 001-WAT WATER 20190438 2829 SHERIDAN CT 208 06/25/2019BC _____ 002-FTG FOOTING 06/28/2019PR _____ AM 001-WAT WATER 20190439 2801 OWEN CT 178 06/25/2019BC _____ 002-FTG FOOTING 06/28/2019BC _____ 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190444 2795 CRANSTON CIR 140 06/17/2019BC _____ 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190449 2481 CATALPA TR 174 06/13/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190451 4538 MARQUETTE ST 06/06/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190460 2210 NORTHLAND LN 76 06/07/2019Comments1: CANCELLED PER BOBBC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190468 4675 PLYMOUTH AVE 1026 06/14/2019BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/24/2019Comments1: WK OF 6/24BF 11:00 001-FTG FOOTING 20190469 824 ALEXANDRA LN 32 06/19/2019Comments1: SOPRIS, HMDPR _____ 002-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 06/27/2019PR _____ 003-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 06/27/2019BF _____ 004-BKF BACKFILL 06/27/2019Comments1: HMDBC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190470 1002 WHITE PLAINS LN 57 06/14/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190471 2464 SUMAC DR 59 06/13/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190472 319 W KENDALL DR 06/13/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190475 2942 OLD GLORY AVE 267 06/10/2019Comments1: FINALBC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190476 682 YELLOWSTONE LN 73 06/13/2019BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190480 2605 OVERLOOK CT 25 06/25/2019Comments1: PATIO DOOR DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ AM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190481 4579 GARDINER AVE 1105 06/10/2019BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190482 2901 ELLSWORTH DR. 06/28/2019BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20190483 1405 WOODSAGE AVE 23 06/19/2019BF _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 06/26/2019Comments1: RSS, BRIARWOODBC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190484 1107 S BRIDGE ST 06/21/2019BC _____ AM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190490 492 HONEYSUCKLE LANE 06/13/2019Comments1: LATE AMBC _____ 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20190492 794 HAYDEN DR 62 06/27/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190495 428 WINTERBERRY DR. 98 06/14/2019BF _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20190497 1555 MONTROSE CT 34 06/24/2019Comments1: PRESTWICK - UPLANDBF _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 06/27/2019Comments1: LATE AM, UPLANDBF _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20190498 1961 WREN RD 19 06/21/2019Comments1: PRESTWICK - UPLANDBF _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 06/25/2019Comments1: PW- UPLANDBF _____ 003-BKF BACKFILL 06/28/2019Comments1: UPLANDBC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190503 1203 SUNSET AVE 06/18/2019BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 06/24/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190505 2121 IROQUOIS LN 70 06/14/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190509 1000 INDEPENDENCE BLVD 12 06/18/2019PR _____ 001-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 20190515 836 ALEXANDRA LN 38 06/27/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190516 2512 BOOMER LN 06/13/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190519 1124 WESTERN LN 75 06/20/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190527 377 BERTRAM DR 1112 06/17/2019 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190531 2481 CATALPA TR 174 06/20/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190534 1022 WHITE PLAINS LN 56 06/17/2019BC _____ AM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190535 1021 WHITE PLAINS LN 50 06/18/2019BC _____ AM 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20190537 687 PARKSIDE LN 114 06/24/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190538 2398 IROQUOIS LN 34 06/26/2019Comments1: 10-11BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190543 2521 ALAN DALE LN 124 06/25/2019Comments1: LATE AMBC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190545 2977 OLD GLORY DR 260 06/20/2019BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190546 807 STATE ST 06/21/2019Comments1: WINDOWS/PATIO DOORBC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190549 405 W RIDGE ST 06/25/2019BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20190550 105 APPLE TREE COURT A 0 06/24/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190552 668 YELLOWSTONE LANE 06/21/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190555 2255 NORTHLAND LN 06/28/2019BC _____ AM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190559 442 HONEYSUCKLE LN 157 06/25/2019BC _____ PM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190560 2421 ALAN DALE LN 133 06/25/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190564 428 FAIRHAVEN DR 58 06/19/2019BC _____ PM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190568 2835 CRYDER WAY 480 06/26/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190574 873 CANYON TRAIL 06/28/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190577 2469 CATALPA TR. 06/28/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190584 1032 WHITE PLAINS LN 55 06/20/2019BC _____ AM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190585 2007 SWITCHGRASS LN 06/25/2019Comments1: LATE AM (11AM)BC _____ AM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190588 2391 IROQUOIS LN 5 06/26/2019Comments1: 10AMBC _____ AM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190589 893 CANYON TR 123 06/26/2019Comments1: 10:30-11 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 23DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 23TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ AM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190591 884 CANYON TR 106 06/25/2019Comments1: 10:30-11BC _____ AM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190592 603 WHITE OAK WAY 35 06/21/2019Comments1: MID AMBC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190593 2837 CRANSTON CR 06/26/2019BC _____ AM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190594 2351 SUMAC DR. 22 06/25/2019Comments1: MID AM (10AM)BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190599 407 DOVER COURT NORTH 25 06/26/2019Comments1: 11-12BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190611 1925 CONEFLOWER CT 162 06/26/2019Comments1: 1030-1100BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190612 772 HAYDEN DR 63 06/26/2019Comments1: 1230-1200BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190615 2341 SUMAC DR 17 06/27/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190620 445 WINTERBERRY DR 110 06/27/2019PR _____ 001-WK SERVICE WALK 20190621 1447 CANNONBALL TR 06/25/2019BC _____ PM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190623 2178 ALAN DALE LN. 06/27/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190630 2492 CATALPA TRAIL 06/27/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190638 2222 IROQUOIS LANE 06/26/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190650 688 RED TAIL CT 30 06/28/2019BC 11:30 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190651 443 TWINLEAF TR 86 06/27/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190665 756 HEARTLAND 06/27/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190674 1104 WESTERN LN 06/26/2019BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20190679 2268 MEADOWVIEW LN 11 06/27/2019 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 24DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 24TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: ADD ADDITION 3AGP ABOVE-GROUND POOL 4BDO COMMERCIAL BUILD-OUT 2BIP BUILD INCENTIVE PROGRAM SFD 2BSM BASEMENT REMODEL 3COM COMMERCIAL BUILDING 1CRM COMMERCIAL REMODEL 3DCK DECK 21DRV DRIVEWAY 3FNC FENCE 11GAR GARAGE 1HVC HVAC UNIT/S 1IGP IN-GROUND POOL 1MIS MISCELLANEOUS 1PRG PERGOLA 1PTO PATIO / PAVERS 11REP REPAIR 1ROF ROOFING 63SDW SIDEWALK 1SFA SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED 47SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 273SHD SHED/ACCESSORY BUILDING 1SOL SOLAR PANELS 1WHR WATER HEATER REPLACEMENT 2WIN WINDOW REPLACEMENT 3INSPECTION SUMMARY: BG BASEMENT AND GARAGE FLOOR 3BGS BASEMENT GARAGE STOOPS 13BKF BACKFILL 17BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 4EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPECTION 22ELU ELECTRICAL - UNDERSLAB 1EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 5ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 2ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WATER 10FIN FINAL INSPECTION 67FOU FOUNDATION 16FTG FOOTING 19GAR GARAGE FLOOR 3INS INSULATION 15PHD POST HOLE - DECK 5PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 8PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READY 29PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 14PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 17PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20PWK PRIVATE WALKS 1 DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 25DATE: 07/01/2019 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 25TIME: 09:56:24 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORTID: PT4A0000.WOWINSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 06/01/2019 TO 06/30/2019INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP.TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------REI REINSPECTION 10REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 16RFR ROUGH FRAMING 24RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 14ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & WATER 57STP STOOP 10SUM SUMP 5TRN TRENCH - (GAS, ELECTRIC, ETC) 3UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 2WAT WATER 8WK SERVICE WALK 1WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20INSPECTOR SUMMARY: BC BOB CREADEUR 218BF B&F INSPECTOR CODE SERVICE 105EEI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES 29PBF BF PLUMBING INSPECTOR 6PR PETER RATOS 103STATUS SUMMARY: A BC 1C BC 34C BF 6C EEI 15C PR 25I BC 182I BF 92I EEI 3I PBF 6I PR 76T BC 1T BF 7T EEI 11T PR 2REPORT SUMMARY: 461 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #3 Tracking Number EDC 2019-61 Property Maintenance Report for June 2019 Economic Development Committee – August 6, 2019 Informational None Pete Ratos Community Development Name Department Page | 1 Property Maintenance Report June 2019 Adjudication: 12 Property Maintenance Cases heard in June 6/3/2019 N 3941 4512 Marquette St. Motor Vehicles Dismissed N 3943 2772 Hobbs Ct. Motor Vehicles Dismissed N 3944 98 E Schoolhouse Rd. Unpermitted Signs Liable $250 6/24/2019 N 3945 2366 Sumac Dr. Motor Vehicles Dismissed N 3946 2744 Alan Dale Ln. Motor Vehicles Dismissed N 3947 2374 Titus Dr. Motor Vehicles Dismissed N 3948 2374 Titus Dr. Motor Vehicles Dismissed N 3949 410 E Main St. Accessory Building Liable $2,625 N 3950 1569 Walsh Dr. Weeds Liable $500 N 4151 706 Heustis St. Weeds Liable $500 N 4152 1084 Redwood Dr. Weeds Dismissed N 4153 577 E Kendall Dr. Exterior Property Liable $500 Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Pete Ratos, Code Official CC: Bart Olson, Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Lisa Pickering Date: July 1, 2019 Subject: June Property Maintenance Case # Case Date TYPE OF VIOLATIONSTATUS VIOLATION LETTER SENTFOLLOW UP STATUSCITATION ISSUEDDATE OF HEARINGPOSTED PUBLIC WORKS TO MOW20190420 6/26/2019 Grass & Weeds IN VIOLATION20190419 6/28/2019 SIGN BLOCKING SIGHTLINEIN VIOLATION20190418 6/24/2019 Grass Height IN VIOLATION6/24/201920190417 6/24/2019 Grass Height IN VIOLATION6/24/201920190416 6/27/2019 Grass & Weeds IN VIOLATION20190415 6/27/2019 Weeds & Grass IN VIOLATION20190414 6/26/2019 Damage to Parkway IN VIOLATION 6/27/201920190413 6/26/2019 Junk, Trash & RefuseIN VIOLATION 6/27/201920190412 6/26/2019 RV Parking IN VIOLATION 6/26/201920190411 6/26/2019 Accessory Building Too Close to Main StructureIN VIOLATION 6/26/201920190410 6/26/2019 Grass Height IN VIOLATION 6/26/201920190409 6/17/2019 Lack of Public SidewalkCLOSED COMPLIANT20190408 6/19/2019 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 6/20/201920190406 6/19/2019 Fence in Disrepair & Grass HeightIN VIOLATION 6/20/201920190405 6/19/2019 Vehicle Parking IN VIOLATION 6/20/201920190404 6/19/2019 Grass Height COMPLIANT COMPLIANT20190403 6/13/2019 Damage to Parkway IN VIOLATION 6/14/201920190402 6/13/2019 Grass Clippings in StreetCLOSED 6/14/2019 COMPLIANT20190401 6/13/2019 Grass Clippings in StreetCLOSED 6/14/2019 COMPLIANT20190400 6/13/2019 Grass Height CLOSED COMPLIANT 6/13/201920190399 6/12/2019 Grass Height IN VIOLATION6/12/201920190398 6/12/2019 Wind Feathers Installed without PermitPENDING 6/12/201920190397 6/12/2019 Auxillary building too close to main structureCLOSED 6/12/2019 COMPLIANT20190396 6/12/2019 Grass & Weeds IN VIOLATION6/12/201920190395 6/12/2019 Vehicle & Junk, Trash & RefuseIN VIOLATION 6/12/201920190394 6/12/2019 Grass Height IN VIOLATION6/12/201920190393 6/11/2019 Grass & Weeds IN VIOLATION6/11/201920190392 6/11/2019 Grass & Weeds IN VIOLATION6/11/2019Case Report06/01/2019 - 06/30/2019ADDRESS OF COMPLAINT541 Omaha DrGREENBRIAR & RT 47706 Heustis St1569 Walsh DrFairfax WayCountry Hills Rt 71 442 Honeysuckle Ln2765 Cranston Cir372 Sutton Dr2967 Ellsworth Dr4499 Tampa Dr711 Greenfield Turn4512 Marquette St112 S Conover Ct120 Strawberry Ln2042 Wild Indigo Ln613 Greenfield Turn2588 Lyman Loop2587 Lyman Loop3284 Pinewood Dr301 Adams102 W Fox St2923 Grande Trail702 S Main St112 Blackberry Ct2957 Ellsworth Dr1192 Taus Cir1142 Kate DrPage: 1 of 3 20190391 6/5/2019 Weeds CLOSED COMPLIANT 6/5/201920190390 6/11/2019 Grass Height IN VIOLATION 6/11/2019 6/11/201920190389 6/11/2019 NOXIOUS ODOR COMING FROM GREEN ORGANICSCLOSED20190388 6/11/2019 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 6/11/201920190387 6/10/2019 Lack of Permit CLOSED COMPLIANT20190386 6/10/2019 Grass Height CLOSED 6/11/2019 COMPLIANT 6/10/201920190385 6/7/2019 Possible fence without a permitCLOSED COMPLIANT20190384 6/7/2019 Light Pole IN VIOLATION 6/10/201920190383 6/7/2019 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 6/10/201920190382 6/7/2019 Grass Height CLOSED COMPLIANT 6/7/201920190381 6/7/2019 Vehicle CLOSED 6/10/2019 COMPLIANT20190380 6/7/2019 Vehicle CLOSED 6/10/2019 COMPLIANT20190379 6/7/2019 Grass Height CLOSED COMPLIANT 6/7/201920190378 6/7/2019 Grass & Weeds IN VIOLATION6/7/201920190377 6/7/2019 Grass & Weeds CLOSED COMPLIANT 6/7/201920190376 6/7/2019 Grass & Weeds CLOSED COMPLIANT 6/7/201920190375 6/6/2019 Grass & Weeds IN VIOLATION6/7/201920190374 6/5/2019 Grass & Weeds IN VIOLATION6/5/201920190373 6/6/2019 Tree Branches/RubbishIN VIOLATION 6/6/2019 6/25/2019 7/29/201920190372 6/6/2019 Soil Erosion and Sediment Control MaintenanceIN VIOLATION 6/6/201920190371 6/15/2019 GRASS & WEEDS DUPLICATE COMPLIANT 6/6/201920190370 6/5/2019 Soil Erosion and Sediment Control MaintenanceIN VIOLATION 5/5/2019 7/8/201920190369 6/4/2019 Sign without Permit IN VIOLATION 6/5/2019 IN VIOLATION20190368 6/5/2019 Grass Height CLOSED COMPLIANT 6/4/201920190367 6/4/2019 Grass Height CLOSED COMPLIANT 6/4/201920190366 6/4/2019 Grass Height CLOSED COMPLIANT 6/4/201920190365 6/4/2019 Grass & Weeds CLOSED 6/5/2019 COMPLIANT 6/4/201920190364 6/4/2019 Grass & Weeds IN VIOLATION6/4/201920190363 6/4/2019 Grass & Weeds IN VIOLATION20190362 6/4/2019 Grass & Weeds COMPLIANT COMPLIANT20190361 6/4/2019 Grass Height PENDING20190360 6/3/2019 Grass Height CLOSED 6/4/2019 COMPLIANT20190359 6/4/2019 Junk, Trash & RefuseCLOSED COMPLIANT20190358 6/4/2019 Open Burning CLOSED 6/4/2019 COMPLIANT20190357 6/4/2019 Grass Height CLOSED COMPLIANT 6/6/201920190356 6/3/2019 Grass Height CLOSED COMPLIANT 5/23/2019 6/24/2019 5/15/2019 YES20190355 6/3/2019 Vehicle IN VIOLATION 6/4/201920190354 6/3/2019 Grass & Weeds PENDING COMPLIANT 6/11/2019 7/15/2019 5/31/2019 YES2389 Iroquois Ln302 Olsen St0208100006203 Center Pkwy904 S Main St512 Redbud807 Morgan St1901 S Bridge St602 Greenfield Turn1824 B Country Hills 851 Greenfield Turn847 Greenfield Turn847 Greenfield Turn906 S Carly Cir966 S Carly Cir947 N Carly Circle956 & 966 N Carly Shadow Wood Dr 320 Blackberry LnLyman Loop - Grande Reserve Subdivision373 Bertram DrTIMBER GLEN SUBDIVISION98 E Schoolhouse Road2477 Wilton Ct602 Windette Ridge 437 Sutton StBldg 2 Lot 3044 1021 Blackberry Behind 261 Barrett Greenbriar Retention Prestwick 307 W Ridge St2947 Ellsworth8591 Route 126373 Bertram Dr1084 Redwood Dr307 W Ridge St407 Adams StPage: 2 of 3 Total Records: 667/1/2019Page: 3 of 3 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #4 Tracking Number EDC 2019-62 Economic Development Report for July 2019 Economic Development Committee – August 6, 2019 N/A See attached. Bart Olson Administration Name Department 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 102 • Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Phone 630-553-0843 • FAX 630-553-0889 Monthly Report – for August 2019 EDC Meeting of the United City of Yorkville July 2019 Activity Downtown Redevelopment: - Working with tenants who are interested in the commercial space of the Old Historic Jail. Also working with Peter McKnight and his business partner Cary Coles. - Working with a new restaurant on the former Cobblestone addition (last known as 1836 Provisions and Drink Lab). The name of the restaurant is “Parma Pizza Bar”. www.parmapizzabar.com The menu will include Italian specialties and Neapolitan style pizza. It is hopeful that the new restaurant will be open this fall. The entrance to the restaurant will be in the rear of the building. - Working with owner of the Casa Santiago building and perspective tenant(s). Development south of Fox River: - Continue working with Eleno Silva on banquet center. Eleno is completing both exterior and interior construction in Stagecoach Crossing. Official name of the business is “Martini Banquets”. He is focusing on opening very soon. The first official wedding is scheduled for Saturday, September 7th. - “Roadhouse Rte 47”, at Fountain Village, is officially opening on Friday, August 2nd. - Continue working with a business who is interested in the NE corner of Route 47 and 71 to do a major ground up project. - Working with the “School of Expressive Arts & Learning (SEAL)” www.seal-il.com . Karen Larsen, currently owns and operates 3 other locations in Romeoville, Lombard & Woodstock. The location that she has selected in Yorkville is 109 Beaver (former Meadowvale facility) in the Fox Industrial Park. Currently 18 students from Yorkville School District 115 travel to the Romeoville location. Yorkville School District is very supportive of this project, and has provided a letter of support to the City. This school works with students from Kindergarten through age 22. The school focus on life skills, and is also vocational. They work with the local business community, as well. When fully operational, there be approximately 80 students at the Yorkville location, and this facility will create 40 new jobs. They have applied for a Special Use, for the location. There will be significant renovations made to the building, after special use process is complete, and they close on the property. Development north of the Fox River: - Kendall Crossing…Construction is in full swing for the “Hacienda Real” building (opening December 2019), the “Flight Tasting Room & Bottle Shoppe” (opening September 2019) building, and of course the “Holiday Inn Express & Suites” and “Kendall Banquets”. “Burnt Barrel Social” (opening Fall 2019) with 2,300 square feet and “Chicago Title” (opening September 2019) with 1,600 square feet will complete the remainder of the multi- tenant building. “Burnt Barrell Social” is a new local gathering place with great food, and small batch whiskey and will be owned and operated by Yorkville resident, Matt Strong. - Kendall Marketplace…Continue to work perspective inline tenants, tenants for a future multi-tenant out lot building, and a national restaurant for new construction on an out lot and with Alex’s broker, Jason Pesola. - “Arby’s” remodel has begun. It is hopeful that the building renovation will be complete in late September. Then the owner, Yonas Hagos, has to begin training. Opening is anticipated in October 2019. - “Gas N Wash” has a new site in Yorkville. They have submitted plans and are officially beginning their approval process. This is for a 5 plus acre parcel under contract at northeast corner of Route 47 and Waterpark Way. They would like to begin construction this fall, and be open in the spring of 2020. - Working with a variety of retail and service-based businesses that are exploring opportunities in Yorkville. Industrial Development: - Continue to work with “Morton Buildings” as they begin building their construction center in Yorkville Business Center. Recreation: - Go for it Sports…continue working with the center. “Go For It Sports” continues to develop exciting new programs such as “Summer Sports Camps”, “Indoor Adult Flag Football League”, and “Private Birthday Parties”. Other Activity: - Personally, met with 47 existing Yorkville businesses in July. - Attended the quarterly SBA meeting in Chicago, to learn about programs available to assist our local business community. Respectfully submitted, Lynn Dubajic 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 102 Yorkville, IL 60560 lynn@dlkllc.com 630-209-7151 cell Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #5 Tracking Number EDC 2019-63 Lenny’s Gas N Wash (Special Use, Sign Variance, Final Plat) Economic Development Committee - August 6, 2019 Details proposed Gas N Wash Special Use, Sign Variance, and Final Plat requests Jason Engberg Community Development Name Department SUMMARY: The petitioner, Leonard McEnery, on behalf of Lenny’s Gas N Wash, LLC, has filed an application requesting special use permit and final plat approval pursuant to Section 10-6-0 of the Yorkville City Code for a gasoline service station with accessory convenience store and ancillary car wash. The petitioner is also seeking sign variance approval to increase the maximum sign area for a monument sign in a business district from 64 square feet to 107 square feet. The property is zoned B-3 General Business District and is located at the northeast corner of the State Route 47 (Bridge Street) and Waterpark Way intersection. This property will be a subdivision of the larger, approximately 72-acre, O’Keefe property which was originally annexed into the City in 2006 via Ordinances 2006-101 and 2006-102. PROPERTY INFORMATION: The 5.04-acre property is currently being utilized for agricultural purposes and is currently zoned as B-3 General Business District. The following are the current immediate surrounding zoning and land uses: Zoning Land Use North B-3 General Business District Undeveloped Land East B-3 General Business District Raging Waves/Farmland South B-3 General Business District Raging Waves Parking West R-2/R-4 PUD (Westbury East) Undeveloped Land Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Jason Engberg, Senior Planner Date: July 23, 2019 Subject: PZC 2019-19 Lenny’s Gas N Wash – Waterpark Way Proposed New Fuel Station & Convenience Store (Special Use, Sign Variance & Final Plat) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: As proposed, the Gas N Wash will be a full-service gas station for personal vehicles and large semi- trucks. The project will also include an automated car wash and convenience store for its patrons. Two potential fast food establishment will be attached to the convenience store and both will be accessible internally and one will be accessible externally via a drive-through lane. SITE PLAN: The proposed site plan was reviewed by various City departments and outside agencies to ensure compliance with applicable ordinances, regulations and standards with regard to building setbacks, parking/parking setbacks, circulation/access roads, stormwater management/utilities, landscaping and signage. Below are the summaries of those reviews. Bulk Regulations The petitioner has depicted the following property’s building setback locations: Building Setback Required Minimum Proposed Setback Front Yard 20 feet 95.5 feet (Car Wash) Interior Side Yard 50 feet 128.8 feet (Car Wash) Corner Side Yard 30 feet 82 feet (C-Store) Rear Yard 20 feet 145 feet (C-Store) Section 10-3-5-B states that “No accessory building or structure shall be closer than ten feet (10') to any main building or closer to the public way than the principal building on the lot.” Therefore, due to its location on the property, the Car Wash will be deemed as the primary structure since it is located closer to the public way than the C-Store. The maximum building height in the B-3 District is 80 feet. The overall height of the primary building is about 34 feet at its peak (Car Wash) and the accessory building maximum height is about 21 feet. The maximum lot coverage for the B-3 General Business District including all impervious surfaces is 80 percent. As stated on the site data table, the proposed impervious lot coverage is 67 percent. Therefore, the petitioner meets all bulk regulations according to the submitted materials. Parking and Loading The submitted plans show a total of 31 parking spaces including 2 handicap accessible spaces. Additionally, there are 15 parking spots detailed as “vacuum stalls” to accommodate the car wash with another 1 handicap accessible spot. The total minimum required parking spaces needed per the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance is 21 spaces (Section 10-16-3). Therefore, the proposed 31 spaces exceed the required minimum. Due to the overall gross floor area of the C-Store, the petitioner is not required to locate a loading berth as designated in Section 10-16-9. While it is not required, the petitioner has designated an area away from the main structure for box car deliveries. This space is adequate in size and location to allow for deliveries without interfering with onsite traffic and parking. The petitioner meets the required parking lot setback of 20 feet from arterial roadways and 10 feet from non-arterial roadways (Section 10-7-1). Stacking All drive-in and drive-through facilities shall provide vehicle stacking in accordance with table 10.16.05 of the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance: Use Minimum Number of Vehicles Car Wash, Automatic 5 vehicles per bay at entrance 2 vehicles per bay at exit Restaurant, Fast Food 3 vehicles behind menu board 3 vehicles behind first window The petitioner meets these requirements by providing 5 vehicle spots at the entrance and 2 vehicle spots at the exit of the car wash. Additionally, the petitioner is providing 7 vehicle spots behind the menu board and 3 vehicle spots before the first window. Appearance Code The petitioner has submitted elevations and renderings which illustrate that the project will comply with the City’s Appearance Code (Section 8-15-5): Criteria for Appearance of the City Code, new non-residential structures shall have at least fifty percent (50%) of the total building constructed of masonry products or precast concrete incorporated as follows: i. Front Façade: At least 50% shall incorporate masonry products or precast concrete. ii. Any other facade that abuts a street shall incorporate masonry products or precast concrete. Signage The petitioner has submitted a sign package for the entire project and is requesting a sign variance for the size of the monument sign. Per Section 10-20-9-A of the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance, free standing monument signs on lots three (3) acres or larger with more than one street frontage, one freestanding sign sixty-four (64) square feet or less in area and twelve feet (12’) or less in height per street frontage with an entrance/exit is allowed. The petitioner is requesting a single monument sign which is just under 12 feet in height and is 107 square feet in area. The sign height meets the City’s standards, but the area of the sign is 40% larger than the City’s maximum allowable area. Therefore, the petitioner is requesting a sign variance to increase the maximum allowable sign area. The most recent gas station developed within Yorkville, Casey’s Gas Station, also requested a variance for their monument sign which requested a 32% increase in size due to state laws requiring the E-85 price to be shown. This request was recommended for approval by Planning and Zoning Commission and approved by City Council. Staff supports the sign variance request due to the increased right-of-way acquired for Illinois Route 47 (55 feet) and the State regulations requiring the E-85 pricing being shown. Driveways Per Section 10-16-3-D of the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance, nonresidential driveways shall be a minimum of two hundred feet (200') from the driveway edge to the nearest intersecting street right of way line. Driveways not meeting the minimum distances may be approved administratively by the City Administrator with a recommendation to approve made by the City Engineer. If administrative approval is not granted, the petitioner must request a variance for this item. The proposed driveways meet this standard but staff is recommending providing a “Do Not Block Entrance” sign at both southern driveway entrances with pavement striping on Waterpark Way to avoid potential conflicts with vehicles in turning lanes exiting the waterpark and/or gas station. Lighting A photometric plan has been provided along with manufacturers cut sheets of the proposed light standards to be installed within the parking lot area. Maximum illumination at the property line shall not exceed 0.1 foot-candle and no glare shall spill onto adjacent properties or rights of way. Section 10-16-3-D-7 of the Zoning Code requires the average foot candle to be between 2.0 and 2.5. Proposed average is 2.31. However, the maximum to minimum light intensity ratio should be no more than 20:1. The petitioner’s submission meets these standards except for the light intensity ration which is a proposed 22.1:1. The petitioner is aware of this requirement and is revising the lighting plan. Truck Turning Template A truck turning template demonstrating the maneuverability of standard sized semitrucks within the site layout has been provided. It appears that there are a few spots where a truck may breach the curbs. Specifically, the right-in-right-out access point off Route 47 shows interference on both northbound ingress and egress. The petitioner will need to address this issue by enlarging the lanes or by making the island mountable to avoid damage to the curbs. Sidewalks Existing sidewalks are located along the southern side of Waterpark Way and the site plans show a sidewalk on the north side of Waterpark Way from Route 47 to the eastern edge of the property. Stormwater Detention Area A backup/dormant Special Service Area will be required per the Stormwater Ordinance to ensure future maintenance of the detention facility. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The 2016 Comprehensive Plan designates this for neighborhood retail. This land use is designated for small to medium scale auto-oriented commercial uses, such as retail centers and restaurants located near residential areas. Additionally, this land use should have landscaping treatments between front parking lots and right-of-ways as well as containing high quality signage which is scaled appropriately. Therefore, the proposed use is consistent with the designated future land use plan. ENGINEERING REVIEW: The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and continues to work with the petitioner in updating the plans as comments are given. All requests made will be required as part of the special use request. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff is seeking input and comments from the Economic Development Committee. The proposed special use, sign variance and final plat is scheduled for a public hearing on August 14, 2019 before the Planning and Zoning Commission. A recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration at the September 10, 2019 regularly scheduled meeting if all requested materials are submitted and comments from the public and commissions are addressed. Staff will be available to answer any question the Economic Development Committee may have at Tuesday night’s meeting. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Petitioner Applications 2. ALTA Survey 3. Gas N Wash Final Plat 4. Gas N Wash Preliminary Site Plans (7-19-19 submission) 5. Gas N Wash Landscape Plan (7-19-19 submission) 6. Gas N Wash Elevations (7-19-19 submission) 7. Gas N Wash Photometric Plan (6-21-19 submission) 8. Gas N Wash Renderings (7-19-19 submission) 9. Gas N Wash Sign Package (7-19-19 submission) PIN - 02-09-100-003-0000IL R O U T E 4 7 W A T E R P A R KNOBUILDINGSOBSERVEDPART OF5.63 ACW A YDATEBYDESCRIPTIONCK. BY:FILE:DR. BY:DATE ISSUED:ORDERED BY:JOB NO.:PG:CIVIL ENGINEERINGSURVEYINGM GINGERICH GEREAUX & ASSOCIATESProfessional Design Firm License # 184.005003P. 815-478-9680 www.mg2a.com F. 815-478-968525620 S. GOUGAR RD | MANHATTAN, IL. 604422MGAGAS N WASHNIBRFS06-08-20191 of 119-45135-3558PROFESSIONALLANDSURVEYORSTATE OFILLINOIS ROB E R T F. SLUIS MANHATTAN, I LL I NOIS Legend of Symbols & AbbreviationsUN2Items Corresponding to Schedule BUtility NotesCALL "J.U.L.I.E." FOR FIELD LOCATIONS OFUNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES 1-800-892-0123UN1THE LOCATION OF UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROMOBSERVED EVIDENCE OF ABOVE GROUND APPURTENANCESONLY. THE SURVEYOR WAS NOT PROVIDED WITHUNDERGROUND PLANS OR SURFACE GROUND MARKINGS TODETERMINE THE LOCATION OF ANY SUBTERRANEAN USES.Miscellaneous NotesMN1MN2MN3MN4BEARING BASIS PER SUBDIVISION PLATDIMENSIONS ON THIS PLAT ARE EXPRESSED IN FEET ANDDECIMAL PARTS THEREOF UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.AREA = 245,233 SQ. FT. OR 5.63 ACRESPART OF PIN # 02-09-100-003-0000POWER POLEGUY WIRESANITARY SEWER MANHOLESTORM SEWER MANHOLEASPHALT SURFACEFIRE HYDRANT(7.77')7.77'P.U.E.D.E.DRAINAGE EASEMENTPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTRECORDED DATAMEASURED DATASET MAG NAILFOUND IRON RODSET IRON RODUNKNOWN MANHOLETELEPHONE PEDESTALELECTRIC METERTRANSFORMERB.S.L.BUILDING SETBACK LINECONCRETE SURFACE AGGREGATE SURFACEVicinity MapSITEROBERT F. SLUISILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR #35-3558LICENSE EXPIRES NOVEMBER 30, 2020THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WEREMADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FORALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS,AND INCLUDES ITEMS () OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON JUNE08, 2019.DATED: 06/08/2019TO: INSURANCE COMPANYSCALE: 1" = 40'L.E.LANDSCAPE EASEMENTMN5AT THE TIME OF THE SURVEY THERE WAS NOOBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF CHANGES IN STREETRIGHT-OF-WAY LINES OR STREET AND SIDEWALK REPAIRSOR CONSTRUCTION.MN6AT THE TIME OF THE SURVEY THERE WAS NOOBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF EARTH MOVING, BUILDINGCONSTRUCTION , OR BUILDING ADDITIONS WITHIN RECENTMONTHS.GALENA ROADROUTE 47TRAFFIC SIGNALTHE FOLLOWING ARE ITEMS IN SCHEDULE B IN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLECOMMITMENT NO. WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF ____________________, 2019WATERPARK WAYDRAFTFOR REVIEWREV 7 / 18 / 19LAND DESCRIPTIONTHAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3 IN O'KEEFE SUBDIVISION UNIT ONE, RECORDED ASDOCUMENT 200800012915, THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3 55.01 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 46 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3 70.14 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAYOF ROSEWINKEL STREET; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY 108.35 FEET TO A CURVE,CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 315.00 FEET, A CHORD OF 285.34 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 61 DEGREES 00MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID RIGHT OF WAY 296.12 FEET TO A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,HAVING A RADIUS OF 385.00 FEET, A CHORD OF 82.42 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 40 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST;THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID RIGHT OF WAY 82.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST 324.66 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST 520.00 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF ROUTE 47; THENCE SOUTH 01DEGREES 05 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY 465.06 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PIN - 02-09-100-003-0000IL R O U T E 4 7 W A T E R P A R KNOBUILDINGSOBSERVEDPART OF5.63 ACW A Y OWNER:BETTY O'KEEFE FAMILY LIMITEDPARTNERSHIP, LLPLOT 3LOT 15.04 acHEREBY DEDICATED 0.59 ac STORM WATER DETENTIONEASEMENT55.0'S87°58'15"W 55.01'N87°58'09"E 55.01'N1°05'25"W 465.06'50' B.S.L.50' B.S.L. S1°05'08"E 90.38' L = 5 2.8 6' R = 3 15.0 0'N88°13'01"E 308.96'S83°17'12"W 33.89'S69°16'59"E 38.44'S24°16'59"E 33.88'S0°17'03"E 38.40' S3 0 ° 2 9 ' 2 2 " W 3 3 . 0 1 ' S1°46'59"E 224.15'35-3558PROFESSIONALLANDSURVEYORSTATE OFILLINOIS ROB E R T F. SLUIS MANHATTAN, I LL I NOIS COUNTY OF WILL ) SSSTATE OF ILLINOIS )_______________________________________Illinois Professional Land Surveyor #035-003558Dated this ________ day of _______________________, 2019.Robert F. SluisLicense Expires November 30, 2020I DO FURTHER CERTIFY THAT:1. NO PART OF THIS SUBDIVISION IS LOCATED WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA AS IDENTIFIED BY THE FEDERALEMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, FIRM MAP NUMBER 17093C0030G, EFFECTIVE DATE FEBRUARY 4, 2009.2. THE ACCOMPANIED PLAT IS TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF SAID SURVEY.3. ALL LOTS CORNERS WILL BE STAKED WITH 5/8 INCH BY 24 INCH IRON RODS OR MONUMENTED ACCORDING TO THE PLAT ACT ASAMENDED.4. DISTANCES ARE IN FEET AND DECIMAL PARTS THEREOF.5. THIS SUBDIVISION CONTAINS 5.63 ACRES.6. PART OF PIN # 02-09-100-0037. THE PROPERTY LIES WITHIN CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE.THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I, ROBERT F. SLUIS, AN ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, HAVESURVEYED AND SUBDIVIDED THE BELOW DESCRIBED PROPERTY: SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION DATEBYDESCRIPTIONFINAL PLAT BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRDPRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS.GAS N WASHNIBRFS6/14/20191 of 219-451ofGAS N WASH ROUTE 47 YORKVILLE SUBDIVISIONCK. BY:FILE:DR. BY:DATE ISSUED:ORDERED BY:JOB NO.:PG:CIVIL ENGINEERINGSURVEYINGM GINGERICH GEREAUX & ASSOCIATESProfessional Design Firm License # 184.005003P. 815-478-9680 www.mg2a.com F. 815-478-968525620 S. GOUGAR RD | MANHATTAN, IL. 60442MGASCALE: 1" = 30'B.S.L. - BUILDING SETBACK LINE - CONCRETE MONUMENTD.E. - DRAINAGE EASEMENTP.U.E. - PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTDRAFTFOR REVIEWREV 7 / 18 / 2019THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRDPRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THENORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3 IN O'KEEFE SUBDIVISION UNIT ONE, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT200800012915, THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OFSAID LOT 3 55.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTHLINE OF SAID LOT 3 70.14 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF ROSEWINKEL STREET; THENCENORTH 87 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY 108.35 FEET TO ACURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 315.00 FEET, A CHORD OF 285.34 FEETAND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 61 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST; THENCE ALONG SAIDCURVE AND SAID RIGHT OF WAY 296.12 FEET TO A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST, HAVING ARADIUS OF 385.00 FEET, A CHORD OF 82.42 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 40 DEGREES 15MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID RIGHT OF WAY 82.58 FEET; THENCENORTH 01 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST 324.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 58MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST 520.00 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF ROUTE 47; THENCE SOUTH 01DEGREES 05 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY 465.06 FEET TO THE POINT OFBEGINNING. NOTARY CERTIFICATESTATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SSCOUNTY OF _____________________ )I,_______________________________________, A NOTARY PUBLIC, IN AND FOR SAIDCOUNTY, IN THE STATE AFORESAID, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PEOPLE WHOSESIGNATURES APPEAR IN THE "OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE" ARE PERSONALLY KNOWNTO ME TO BE THE SAME PERSONS WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED ON THEFOREGOING INSTRUMENT AS SUCH OWNERS AND THAT THEY APPEARED BEFORE METHIS DAY IN PERSON AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY SIGNED AND DELIVERED THEANNEXED PLAT AS THEIR OWN FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR PURPOSES THEREINSET FORTH.GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND NOTORIAL SEALTHIS ______ DAY OF ___________________________, A.D. 2019.____________________________________________________(NOTARY PUBLIC)OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATESTATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SSCOUNTY OF _____________________ )__________________________________________________ IS THE OWNER OF THE LANDDESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED PLAT HAS CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SURVEYED,SUBDIVIDED AND PLATED AS SHOWN BY THE PLAT FOR USES AND PURPOSES ASINDICATED THEREON, AND DOES HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE AND ADOPT THE SAMEUNDER THE STYLE AND TITLE THEREON INDICATED.DATED THIS ______ DAY OF _________________________, A.D. 2019.BY ____________________________________________________ (OWNER)SCHOOL DISTRICT CERTIFICATESTATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SSCOUNTY OF _____________________ )TO THE BEST OF THE UNDERSIGNED OWNER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE ABOVE DESCRIBEDSUBDIVISION KNOWN AS GAS N WASH YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION LIES WITHIN ____________________________ SCHOOL DISTRICT #_______ AND_______________________________________ HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT #________.DATED THIS ______ DAY OF _________________________, A.D. 2019.BY ____________________________________________________ (OWNER)NOTARY CERTIFICATESTATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SSCOUNTY OF_____________________ )I,_______________________________________, A NOTARY PUBLIC, IN AND FOR SAIDCOUNTY, IN THE STATE AFORESAID, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PEOPLE WHOSESIGNATURES APPEAR IN THE "SCHOOL DISTRICT CERTIFICATE" ARE PERSONALLYKNOWN TO ME TO BE THE SAME PERSONS WHOSE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED ON THEFOREGOING INSTRUMENT AS SUCH OWNERS AND THAT THEY APPEARED BEFORE METHIS DAY IN PERSON AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY SIGNED AND DELIVERED THEANNEXED PLAT AS THEIR OWN FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR PURPOSES THEREINSET FORTH.GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND NOTORIAL SEALTHIS ______ DAY OF ___________________________, A.D. 2019.____________________________________________________(NOTARY PUBLIC)COUNTY CLERK'S CERTIFICATESTATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SSCOUNTY OF KENDALL )I, ______________________________, COUNTY CLERK OF KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS,AND CUSTODIAN OF THE RECORDS AND FILES OF SAID OFFICE, DO HEREBY CERTIFYTHAT I FIND FROM SUCH RECORDS AND FILES, NO DELINQUENT GENERAL TAXES,NO UNPAID CURRENT GENERAL TAXES, NO DELINQUENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTSON FILE AGAINST THE TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED ON THE ATTACHED PLAT OF GAS N WASH ROUTE 47 YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION , AND THAT THERE ARENO UNPAID DEFERRED INSTALLMENTS OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THESAID PROPERTY OR ANY PART THEREOF.DATED THIS ______ DAY OF _________________________, A.D. 2019.________________________________________________COUNTY CLERKSURFACE WATER STATEMENTSTATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SSCOUNTY OF WILL )TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATERSWILL NOT BE CHANGED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS OR ANYPART THEREOF, OR THAT IF SUCH SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE WILL BE CHANGED,REASONABLE PROVISION HAS BEEN MADE FOR COLLECTION AND DIVERSION OF SUCHWATERS INTO PUBLIC AREAS, OR DRAINS WHICH THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS A RIGHTTO USE, AND THAT SUCH SURFACE WATERS WILL BE PLANNED FOR IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE GENERALLY ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES SO AS TO REDUCE THELIKELIHOOD OF DAMAGE TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTY BECAUSE OF THECONSTRUCTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS.DATED THIS ______ DAY OF ____________________________________A.D. 2019._________________________________________________________,ILLINOIS REGISTERED P.E. #062-054935“”“”“”“”DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONSTATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SSCOUNTY OF _________________THIS PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONWITH RESPECT TO ROADWAY ACCESS PURSUANT OF §2 OF “AN ACT TO REVISE THELAW IN RELATION TO PLATS,” AS AMENDED. A PLAN THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTSCONTAINED IN THE DEPARTMENT'S “POLICY ON PERMITS FOR ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TOSTATE HIGHWAYS” WILL, BE REQUIRED BY THE DEPARTMENT. DAY OF , A.D. 2019. ANTHONY J. QUIGLEY, P.E., REGION ONE ENGINEER“”“”CITY ENGINEER CERTIFICATESTATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SSCOUNTY OF ____________________ )I , CITY ENGINEER FOR THE UNITED CITY OFYORKVILLE DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEENINSTALLED OR THE REQUIRED GUARANTEE COLLATERAL HAS BEEN POSTED FORTHE COMPLETION OF ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS, DATED AT YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS THIS _______ DAY OF _______________________ A.D., 2019.________________________________________________CITY ENGINEERDATEBYDESCRIPTION BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRDPRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS.GAS N WASHNIBRFS6/14/20192 of 219-451CK. BY:FILE:DR. BY:DATE ISSUED:ORDERED BY:JOB NO.:PG:CIVIL ENGINEERINGSURVEYINGM GINGERICH GEREAUX & ASSOCIATESProfessional Design Firm License # 184.005003P. 815-478-9680 www.mg2a.com F. 815-478-968525620 S. GOUGAR RD | MANHATTAN, IL. 604422MGACITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATESTATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SSCOUNTY OF KENDALL )APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS,AT A MEETING HELD ON THE _______ DAY OF _______________________ A.D., 2019.________________________________________________PRESIDENT________________________________________________CLERKPLAN COMMISSION CERTIFICATESTATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SSCOUNTY OF KENDALL )APPROVED BY THE PLAN COMMISSION OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS,AT A MEETING HELD ON THE ______ DAY OF _____________________, A.D., 2019.________________________________________________CHAIRMAN________________________________________________SECRETARYOWNER:GAS N WASH YORKVILLE LLC8200 185TH ST. - UNIT KTINLEY PARK, IL 60487CITY CLERK CERTIFICATESTATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SSCOUNTY OF KENDALL )I , CITY CLERK OF THE UNITED CITY OFYORKVILLE ILLINOIS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE NO DELINQUENT ORUNPAID CURRENT OR FORFEITED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS OR ANY DEFERREDINSTALLMENTS APPORTIONED AGAINST THE TRACT INCLUDED IN THIS PLAT,DATED AT YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY ILLINOISTHIS _______ DAY OF _______________________ A.D., 2019.________________________________________________CITY CLERKCITY ADMINISTRATOR CERTIFICATESTATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SSCOUNTY OF KENDALL )APPROVED BY THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS THIS _______ DAY OF _______________________ A.D., 2019.________________________________________________CITY ADMINISTRATORFINAL PLATofGAS N WASH ROUTE 47 YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION LOT 1 5.04 ac 55-ft ROW DEDICATION0.59 acSTORM WATER DETENTION AREA W A T E R P A R K W A YI L L I N O I S R O U T E 4 7O'KEEFE SUBDIVISION UNIT ONE PER DOC. 200800012915445' C-C SPACING12'x75' LOADING ZONE202.0'REFUSESHED55.0' 5' TOP OF BANK= 651 650 646 648 651 650 648 HWL=649.5 ~2.0 Ac-Ft CAR WASH 4,574 S.F.32.7'140.0' S87°58'15"W 55.01' S87°58'15"W 465.00' N87°58'09"E 55.01'S1°05'31"E 465.06'N1°05'25"W 465.06'15 VACUUM STALLS @ 10'W = 150'1 H.C. = 16' MENU BOARD & SPEAKER 651.00 652.20651.70652.50652.006 5 2 . 5 0652.00652.00651.50651.00650.30 651.506 5 3 . 0 0 653.5065 3 . 1 0 653.0065 2 . 6 0 653.00651.70650.7 0 653.306 5 3 . 3 0 652.9565 2 . 9 5 652.40653.10 652.6 0 652.40653. 0 0 650 . 7 0 6 5 0 . 4 0 650.10 649.20 651.00 650.00650.20650. 6 0 650.00 65 0 . 0 0 650.60 650.40 650. 1 0 652.50 651.20 653.30652.20 652.30652.90 652.00652.10652.406 5 2 . 9 0652.40652.90 652.40 650.1 0 6 5 0 . 5 0 651.10 651.5 0 651.9065 0 . 2 0 649 . 9 0 650.30 650.70651.00651.80651.3 0 651.0 0 650.50 651 . 0 0 650.7065 0 . 3 0650.50650.00 64 9 . 6 0 650.10651.10651.20653.30650.806 5 0 . 5 0651.00651.90 650.30651.90651.60 651. 6 0 652.25 650.1 5651.10650.50649.60651. 7 0 6 5 2 . 5 0 6 5 2 . 2 0 65 2 . 2 0 651.20 652.80652.40652.90650. 6 0 650.60649 . 2 0651.40PR TRENCH DRAINLOT 3 50' B.S.L.50' B.S.L.FF=653.00 Dry Bay=652.67 Wash Bay=652.50 650.50651. 0 0 651 . 2 0 650.90650.90650.80650.80650. 5 0UNDERGROUNDFUEL TANKSUNDERGROUNDFUEL TANKS649.05649.12649.37649.63651.30651.00650.006 5 0 . 0 0 650.80650.90 653.30 652.8 0 652.55 652.6 0 651.20652. 2 0 652.4065 0 . 3 0 649.60651.5 0 650.20 651.00650.90 6 5 0 . 4 0 651.10 651 648.70649.05 11 SP.=99.0' C-STORE 7,000 S.F. 87.5'80.0'2 SP.=18.0'2 H.C. SP=32.0'3 SP.=27.0'FF=653.50 650.40 652.00652.30651.90651.70 652.60 651.8 0 65 1 . 9 5 651.60 13 SP.=117.0' 142.5'82.0 ' 95.5' 81.5' 10.0' 112.0'93.5'ESCAPE50.5'50.3'69.5'PROPANE128.8'65 0 . 9 0650.60650. 5 0652.70652.45651.50PROPOSED RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT ACCESSw/ RAISED MEDIAN PER IDOT STANDARDSPROP. 5' CONC. SIDEWALK DETE C T A B L E WAR NI N G ( T Y P.)6/20/19BPHISSUE FOR REVIEW7/18/19RFVCITY COMMENTS© 2018 M.GINGERICH, GEREAUX & ASSOCIATES SHEET NO. OFDESIGN:DRAWING:CHECKED:APPROVED:PLAN EDITION MILESTONESDATEBYDESCRIPTIONCIVIL ENGINEERINGSURVEYINGM GINGERICH GEREAUX & ASSOCIATES2MGAProfessional Design Firm License # 184.005003www.mg2a.com 25620 S. GOUGAR RD. | MANHATTAN, IL. 60442P. 815-478-9680 F. 815-478-9685PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (GEOMETRIC & GRADING)GAS n WASHNE CORNER IL RTE 47 & WATERPARK WAYYORKVILLE, ILLINOIS1 4 SITE DATA Area:219,693.83 sq.ft. (5.04 ac) Current Zoning:B-3 Building Area:11,813 sq.ft. Building Coverage:5.4% Pavement Area*:104,505 sq.ft. Pavement Coverage*:47.6% Landscaping Area:**TBD sq.ft.± Landscaping Coverage:**TBD %± Impervious Coverage:67% * Fueling Canopies are included in Pavement Area. **To be verified with Landscape Architect Plan Height of Proposed C-Store: 34' Height of Proposed Car Wash:21'-2" PARKING DATA Gas Station & Convenience Store (7,000 sf): Convenience Store Number of Parking Stalls Provided:31 Number of Parking Stalls Req'd: 21 (3 spaces /1,000 s.f) Drive Thru / Behind Menu Board Number of Stacking Stalls Provided:7 Number of Stacking Stalls Req'd: 3 Drive Thru / Menu to 1st Window Number of Stacking Stalls Provided:3 Number of Stacking Stalls Req'd: 3 Automatic Car Wash: Entrance Number of Stacking Stalls Provided:5 Number of Stacking Stalls Req'd: 5 (5 stalls per bay) Exit Number of Stacking Stalls Provided:2 Number of Stacking Stalls Req'd: 2 (2 stalls per bay) Pay Station Number of Stacking Stalls Provided:15 Number of Stacking Stalls Req'd: n/a Vacuum Stalls / Parkling Number of Parking Stalls Provided:16 Number of Parking Stalls Req'd: n/a LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3 IN O'KEEFE SUBDIVISION UNIT ONE, RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 200800012915, THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3 55.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3 70.14 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF ROSEWINKEL STREET; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY 108.35 FEET TO A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 315.00 FEET, A CHORD OF 285.34 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 61 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID RIGHT OF WAY 296.12 FEET TO A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 385.00 FEET, A CHORD OF 82.42 FEET, AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 40 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID RIGHT OF WAY 82.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST 324.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST 520.00 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF ROUTE 47; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY 465.06 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Vicinity Map SITE GALE N A R O A D IL ROUTE 47WATER P A R K W A Y OWNER DATA Gas N Wash - Yorkville LLC 8200 185th Street, Unit K Tinley Park, IL 60487 LOT 1 5.04 ac 55-ft ROW DEDICATION0.59 acSTORM WATER DETENTION AREA W A T E R P A R K W A YI L L I N O I S R O U T E 4 7O'KEEFE SUBDIVISION UNIT ONE PER DOC. 200800012915445' C-C SPACING12'x75' LOADING ZONE202.0'REFUSESHED55.0' 5' TOP OF BANK= 651 650 646 648 651 650 648 HWL=649.5 ~2.0 Ac-Ft CAR WASH 4,574 S.F.32.7'140.0' S87°58'15"W 55.01' S87°58'15"W 465.00' N87°58'09"E 55.01'S1°05'31"E 465.06'N1°05'25"W 465.06'15 VACUUM STALLS @ 10'W = 150'1 H.C. = 16' MENU BOARD & SPEAKER 101 L.F. OF 6" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY SERV @ 1.00% PR GREASE TRAP PR 2" WATER SERVICE (TO BE CONFIRMED w/ ANY FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS) PR 6" VAL V E PR 6" D.I. WATER SERVICE (PER FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS) PR SAN INSPECTION M.H. RIM = 652.50 6" INV W=645.76 6" INV N= 645.74 PR TRIPLE SEPARATOR TANKS FOR CAR WASH RIM = 651.50 153 L.F. OF 6" PVC SDR 26 SAN SERV @ 5.43%PR TRENCH DRAIN248 L.F. OF 6" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY SERV. @ 2.32% PR SAN M.H. RIM = 647.20 10" INV N=634.32 10" INV S=634.30 LOT 3 50' B.S.L.50' B.S.L.PR SAN M.H. RIM = 648.00 10" INV N=634.41 10" INV S=634.39 48 L.F. OF 10" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.35% 223 L.F. OF 10" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.35% PR SAN M.H. RIM = 648.00 10" INV N=636.08 (STUB) 10" INV S=636.06 UNDERGROUNDFUEL TANKSUNDERGROUNDFUEL TANKSPR SAN M.H. RIM = 650.70 10" INV N=635.21 10" INV S=635.19 6" INV E=637.19 6" INV NE=637.19 244 L.F. OF 10" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.35% 651 PR SAN M.H. RIM = 651.20 6" INV N=643.96 6" INV S=644.73 6" INV W=642.94 138 L.F. OF 6" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY SERV. @ 1.5% 11 SP.=99.0' C-STORE 7,000 S.F. 87.5'80.0'2 SP.=18.0'2 H.C. SP=32.0'3 SP.=27.0'SPLIT DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE IN BUILDING 13 SP.=117.0' 142.5'82.0 ' 95.5' 81.5' 10.0' 112.0'93.5'ESCAPE50.5'50.3'69.5'PROPANE128.8'PROPOSED RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT ACCESSw/ RAISED MEDIAN PER IDOT STANDARDSPROP. 5' CONC. SIDEWALK DETE C T A B L E WAR NI N G ( T Y P.) OIL/WATER SEPARATOR 1.30 F.E.S. 12” INV SE= 646.00 1.20 CB Ty A, 6' Dia. w/ Restrictor w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 650.00 12” INV NW= 645.94 2.5” Restr. INV = 646.00 3.5" Restr. INV = 647.10 12" INV SW = 645.66 1.10 MH Ty A, 4' Dia w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 651.00 12” INV NE= 645.22 12” INV SW= 645.20 1.00 MH Ty A, 4' Dia w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 650.00 12” INV NE= 644.78 12” INV S= 644.76 EX.EX. INLET - PROP. INV. NORTH 12” INV N= 644.70 EX. INV. S = 644.6+/- 2.50 INL A, 2' Dia w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 650.50 12" INV E = 647.51 2.40 MH Ty A, 4' Dia w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 650.30 12” INV N= 647.09 12" INV E = 647.07 2.36 D.S. CONNECTION F/G = 653.00 12” INV E= 647.07 2.34 D.S. CONNECTION F/G = 653.00 12” INV E= 646.99 2.32 MH Ty A, 4' Dia w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 651.60 12” INV N= 646.91 12” INV W= 646.91 12" INV S = 646.89 2.30 MH Ty A, 4' Dia w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 650.15 12” INV N= 646.81 12” INV S= 646.81 15" INV NE = 646.79 2.20 MH Ty A, 4' Dia w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 650.10 15” INV SW= 646.59 15" INV NE = 646.57 2.12 TRENCH DRAIN w/EJIW V-7384 Grate or similar RIM = 650.10 12” INV SE= 646.24 2.10 MH Ty A, 4' Dia w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 649.50 12” INV NW= 646.11 15” INV SW= 646.11 15" INV NE = 646.09 2.00 F.E.S. 15” INV SW= 646.00 3.40 INL A, 2' Dia w/EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM=650.10 12” INV E= 646.79 3.36 TRENCH DRAIN w/EJIW V-7384 Grate or similar RIM = 652.20 12” INV SE= 647.28 3.34 D.S. CONNECTION F/G = 652.90 12” INV E= 647.33 3.32 CLEANOUT RIM = 652.80 12” INV E= 647.25 12" INV N =647.25 12" INV S =647.23 3.30 MH Ty A, 4' Dia w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 650.50 12” INV N= 646.79 12" INV E= 646.79 12" INV S= 646.77 3.22 INL A, 2' Dia w/EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM=650.50 12” INV E= 646.67 3.20 MH Ty A, 4' Dia w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 650.30 12” INV NW= 646.56 12" INV SW= 646.56 15" INV NE= 646.54 3.10 MH Ty A, 4' Dia w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 649.20 15" INV SW= 646.15 15" INV E= 646.13 3.00 F.E.S. 15” INV E= 646.00 4.10 INL A, 2' Dia w/EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM=650.00 15” INV N= 646.14 4.00 F.E.S. 12” INV S= 646.00 5.40 INL A, 2' Dia w/EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM=650.40 12” INV N= 647.34 5.30 MH Ty A, 4' Dia w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 650.10 12” INV S= 646.94 12" INV NE= 646.92 5.28 CLEANOUT F/G = 651.70 12” INV N= 648.03 5.26 CLEANOUT RIM = 651.40 12” INV S= 647.24 12" INV NE =647.22 5.24 CLEANOUT F/G = 652.10 12” INV N= 647.81 5.22 CLEANOUT RIM = 652.00 12” INV S= 647.14 12" INV N =647.12 5.20 MH Ty A, 4' Dia w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 651.20 8” INV SW= 646.87 8" INV S =646.87 15" INV NW= 646.85 5.10 MH Ty A, 4' Dia w/ EJIW 1050 Fr / M1 Gr RIM= 650.00 12” INV SW= 646.16 15" INV SE =646.16 15" INV N= 646.14 5.00 F.E.S. 12” INV S= 646.00 6/20/19BPHISSUE FOR REVIEW7/18/19RFVCITY COMMENTS© 2018 M.GINGERICH, GEREAUX & ASSOCIATES SHEET NO. OFDESIGN:DRAWING:CHECKED:APPROVED:PLAN EDITION MILESTONESDATEBYDESCRIPTIONCIVIL ENGINEERINGSURVEYINGM GINGERICH GEREAUX & ASSOCIATES2MGAProfessional Design Firm License # 184.005003www.mg2a.com 25620 S. GOUGAR RD. | MANHATTAN, IL. 60442P. 815-478-9680 F. 815-478-9685PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN (UTILITY & STORMWATER)GAS n WASHNE CORNER IL RTE 47 & WATERPARK WAYYORKVILLE, ILLINOIS2 4 STORM SEWER PIPE SCHEDULE 1.00 - EX.19 ln. ft. - 12” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 1.10 - 1.00 137 ln. ft. - 12” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 1.20 - 1.10 145 ln. ft. - 12” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 1.30 - 1.20 25 ln. ft. - 12” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 2.10 - 2.00 29 ln. ft. - 15” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 2.12 - 2.10 41 ln. ft. - 12” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 2.20 - 2.10 91 ln. ft. - 15” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 2.30 - 2.20 66 ln. ft. - 15” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 2.32 - 2.30 24 ln. ft. - 12” PVC Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 2.34 - 2.32 25 ln. ft. - 8” PVC Storm Sewer @ 1.0% 2.36 -2.32 42 ln. ft. - 8” PVC Storm Sewer @ 1.0% 2.40 - 2.30 84 ln. ft. - 12” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 2.50 - 2.40 140 ln. ft. - 12” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 3.10 - 3.00 26 ln. ft. - 15” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 3.20 - 3.10 130 ln. ft. - 15” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 3.22 - 3.20 35 ln. ft. - 12” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 3.30 - 3.20 42 ln. ft. - 12” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 3.32 - 3.30 44 ln. ft. - 8” PVC Storm Sewer @ 1.0% 3.34 - 3.32 26 ln. ft. - 8” PVC Storm Sewer @ 1.0% 3.36 - 3.32 10 ln. ft. - 8” PVC Storm Sewer @ 1.0% 3.40 - 3.30 84 ln. ft. - 12” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 4.10 - 4.00 27 ln. ft. - 12” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 5.10 - 5.00 28 ln. ft. - 15” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 5.20 - 5.10 171 ln. ft. - 12” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 5.22 - 5.20 49 ln. ft. - 8” PVC Storm Sewer @ 1.0% 5.24 - 5.22 133 ln. ft. - 8” PVC Storm Sewer @ 1.0% 5.26 - 5.20 70 ln. ft. - 8” PVC Storm Sewer @ 1.0% 5.28 - 5.26 157 ln. ft. - 8” PVC Storm Sewer @ 1.0% 5.30 - 5.20 90 ln. ft. - 12” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% 5.40 - 5.30 152 ln. ft. - 12” RCP Storm Sewer @ 0.3% OWNER DATA Gas N Wash - Yorkville LLC 8200 185th Street, Unit K Tinley Park, IL 60487 LOT 1 5.04 ac 55-ft ROW DEDICATION0.59 acSTORM WATER DETENTION AREA O'KEEFE SUBDIVISION UNIT ONE PER DOC. 200800012915445' C-C SPACING12'x75' LOADING ZONE202.0'REFUSESHED55.0' 5' TOP OF BANK= 651 650 646 648 651 650 648 HWL=649.5 ~2.0 Ac-Ft CAR WASH 4,574 S.F.32.7'140.0' S87°58'15"W 55.01' S87°58'15"W 465.00' N87°58'09"E 55.01'S1°05'31"E 465.06'N1°05'25"W 465.06'15 VACUUM STALLS @ 10'W = 150'1 H.C. = 16' MENU BOARD & SPEAKER PR TRENCH DRAINU. S. R O U T E 4 7W A T E R P A R K W A Y LOT 3 50' B.S.L.50' B.S.L.FF=653.00 Dry Bay=652.67 Wash Bay=652.50 UNDERGROUNDFUEL TANKSUNDERGROUNDFUEL TANKS651 11 SP.=99.0' C-STORE 7,000 S.F. 87.5'80.0'2 SP.=18.0'2 H.C. SP=32.0'3 SP.=27.0'FF=653.50 13 SP.=117.0' 142.5'82.0 ' 95.5' 81.5' 10.0' 112.0'93.5'ESCAPE50.5'50.3'69.5'PROPANE128.8'PROPOSED RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT ACCESSw/ RAISED MEDIAN PER IDOT STANDARDSPROP. 5' CONC. SIDEWALK DETE C T A B L E WAR NI N G ( T Y P.) OIL/WATER SEPARATOR 6/20/19BPHISSUE FOR REVIEW7/18/19RFVCITY COMMENTS© 2018 M.GINGERICH, GEREAUX & ASSOCIATES SHEET NO. OFDESIGN:DRAWING:CHECKED:APPROVED:PLAN EDITION MILESTONESDATEBYDESCRIPTIONCIVIL ENGINEERINGSURVEYINGM GINGERICH GEREAUX & ASSOCIATES2MGAProfessional Design Firm License # 184.005003www.mg2a.com 25620 S. GOUGAR RD. | MANHATTAN, IL. 60442P. 815-478-9680 F. 815-478-96853 4 OWNER DATA Gas N Wash - Yorkville LLC 8200 185th Street, Unit K Tinley Park, IL 60487 TRUCK TURNING PLANGAS N WASHYORKVILLE, ILLINOISWB-65 TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT (7) - SOUTHBOUND TRUCK TURNING EAST ONTO WATERPARK WAY FROM THE LEFT TURN LANE ON ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 TO THE TRUCK FUELING ENTRANCE AND TURN LEFT TO THE AUTO FUELING AREA. - ENTERING AUTO FUELING AREA FOR FUEL TANKER DELIVERIES -SOUTHBOUND TRUCKS MAY EXIT THE SITE VIA THE RIGHT-IN, RIGHT-OUT ENTRANCE ON ROUTE 47, HEADING NORTHBOUND, OR MAY TURN RIGHT AT NORTH E-W DRIVE AS SHOWN IN MOVEMENT (8) AND THRU TRUCK FUELING FOR EXIT TO WATERPARK WAY. WB-65 TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT (2) - EASTBOUND TRUCK TURNING INTO COMMERCIAL FUELING AREA OFF OF WATERPARK WAY - TRUCKS WILL EXIT THE SITE VIA THE RIGHT-IN, RIGHT-OUT ENTRANCE ON ROUTE 47, HEADING NORTHBOUND ONLY, UNLESS THEY "U" TURN AFTER FUELING AND EXIT TO WATERPARK WAY AS SHOWN IN MOVEMENT (3). LOT 1 5.04 ac 55-ft ROW DEDICATION0.59 acSTORM WATER DETENTION AREA O'KEEFE SUBDIVISION UNIT ONE PER DOC. 200800012915445' C-C SPACING12'x75' LOADING ZONE202.0'REFUSESHED55.0' 5' TOP OF BANK= 651 650 646 648 651 650 648 HWL=649.5 ~2.0 Ac-Ft CAR WASH 4,574 S.F.32.7'140.0' S87°58'15"W 55.01' S87°58'15"W 465.00' N87°58'09"E 55.01'S1°05'31"E 465.06'N1°05'25"W 465.06'15 VACUUM STALLS @ 10'W = 150'1 H.C. = 16' MENU BOARD & SPEAKER PR TRENCH DRAINU. S. R O U T E 4 7W A T E R P A R K W A Y LOT 3 50' B.S.L.50' B.S.L.FF=653.00 Dry Bay=652.67 Wash Bay=652.50 UNDERGROUNDFUEL TANKSUNDERGROUNDFUEL TANKS651 11 SP.=99.0' C-STORE 7,000 S.F. 87.5'80.0'2 SP.=18.0'2 H.C. SP=32.0'3 SP.=27.0'FF=653.50 13 SP.=117.0' 142.5'82.0 ' 95.5' 81.5' 10.0' 112.0'93.5'ESCAPE50.5'50.3'69.5'PROPANE128.8'PROPOSED RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT ACCESSw/ RAISED MEDIAN PER IDOT STANDARDSPROP. 5' CONC. SIDEWALK DETE C T A B L E WAR NI N G ( T Y P.) OIL/WATER SEPARATOR 6/20/19BPHISSUE FOR REVIEW7/18/19RFVCITY COMMENTS© 2018 M.GINGERICH, GEREAUX & ASSOCIATES SHEET NO. OFDESIGN:DRAWING:CHECKED:APPROVED:PLAN EDITION MILESTONESDATEBYDESCRIPTIONCIVIL ENGINEERINGSURVEYINGM GINGERICH GEREAUX & ASSOCIATES2MGAProfessional Design Firm License # 184.005003www.mg2a.com 25620 S. GOUGAR RD. | MANHATTAN, IL. 60442P. 815-478-9680 F. 815-478-96854 4 OWNER DATA Gas N Wash - Yorkville LLC 8200 185th Street, Unit K Tinley Park, IL 60487 TRUCK TURNING PLANGAS N WASHYORKVILLE, ILLINOISWB-65 TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT (4) - EXITING AUTO FUELING AREA FOR FUEL TANKER DELIVERIES -TRUCKS EXITING THE SITE WILL BE ABLE TO USE EITHER THE LEFT TURN OR RIGHT TURN LANES ON WATERPARK WAY AT THE ROUTE 47 INTERSECTION TO PROCEED EITHER NORTHBOUND OR SOUTHBOUND WB-65 TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT (5) - NORTHBOUND TRUCK TURNING EAST INTO SITE VIA RIGHT-IN, RIGHT-OUT ON ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 - TRUCKS WILL EXIT THE SITE VIA THE COMMERCIAL FUELING ENTRANCE PROVIDED ON WATERPARK WAY, AND PROCEED TO THE LEFT OR RIGHT TURN LANES AT ROUTE 47 INTERSECTION. WB-65 TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT (6) - EXTENSION FROM TURNING MOVEMENT (4), TO CHECK TANKER DELIVERIES COMING INTO SITE FROM RIGHT-IN, RIGHT-OUT REFUSE SHED 5' TOP OF BANK= 651650646648651650648HWL=649.5 ~2.0 Ac-FtCAR WASH4,574 S.F.S87°58'15"W 55.01'S87°58'15"W 465.00'N87°58'09"E 55.01'S1°05'31"E 465.06'N1°05'25"W 465.06'15 VACUUM STALLS @ 10'W = 150'1 H.C. = 16'MENU BOARD& SPEAKER50' B.S.L.50' B.S.L.FF=653.00Dry Bay=652.67Wash Bay=652.50UNDERGROUNDFUEL TANKS UNDERGROUNDFUEL TANKS 651C-STORE7,000 S.F.FF=653.50ESCAPE 414'-9"320'-1" 8 2 ' - 3 "335'-8"92'-5"8 7 ' - 3 "58'-5"201'-8"DRAW / REVISIONLD/VTReview21JUN2019SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEGas N WashYorkville, IllinoisPROJECT815-254-0091 www.uplanddesign.comPark Planning and Landscape Architecture24042 Lockport St, Plainfield, Illinois 60544ltdProject Number 707© Copyright 2019 Upland Design Ltd.W:\746-Yorkville Gas N wash II\20-ConceptsPLOT: UPLAND 2013LandscapePlanLandscapePlan1.Notes indicated on grading plans shall pertain to landscape plans. Final grade of plantingbeds shall be as per grading plan.2.The landscape contractor shall be responsible for making themselves familiar with allunderground utilities and structures.3.All existing plant material and trees shall be saved and protected unless otherwise noted.Contractor to protect new and existing trees and landscaping from damage and shall restoreall areas disturbed as a result of construction.4.Plant material shall be supplied from Northern Illinois nursery stock, shall be dug the plantingseason it is installed, and shall conform to the American Association of Nurseryman'sstandards.5.Plant material shall be size and type specified. Substitution of plant material shall be on acase by case basis and approved in writing by the Owner's Representative. In no case shallplant material be smaller than indicated in the plans.6.Do not willfully proceed with plantings as designed when it is obvious that obstructionsand/or grade differences exist that may not have been known during the design process.Such conditions shall be immediately brought to the attention of the Owner's Representative.7.All plant material shall be inspected and approved by the Owner's Representative prior to theinstallation of any and all plant material.8.Plant locations shall be flagged in field with Owner's Rep. Final location of all plant materialshall be subject to approval of the Owner's Representative prior to digging any holes. Thelandscape contractor is responsible for providing Owner's Representative with 48 hourminimum advance notice prior to planting.9.Plants shall be watered on the day they are planted and maintained with watering until finalacceptance of the project.10.Apply a pre-emergent as per manufacturer's specification prior to installing mulch.11.Beds and tree rings (6' diameter) shall have 3" of hardwood shredded mulch applied and a4" deep spade edge at lawn. Trees that are not located in beds, shall have a tree ring.12.Landscape plant material shall be guaranteed for 12 months from final acceptance. Anyplant 1/3 dead or more shall be replaced under the guarantee.13.Contractor to prepare landscape beds by roto-tilling 2" of Mushroom Compost into new beds.Do not add compost nor roto-till within drip line of existing trees.14.Lawn Seeding shall be under favorable weather conditions, and shall follow dates inspecification.15.Turf mixes shall be installed and lawn established at all disturbed areas.16.Do not overseed into mulch beds and paving.17.Contractor shall restore all areas disturbed as a result of construction.GENERAL NOTES: LANDSCAPE0SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"15'30'60'90'North LEGENDShade TreeShrubOrnamental GrassPLANT LISTProperty LinePr o p e r t y L i n e IL-47Waterpark WayLawnLawnLawn5 - Invincibelle Ruby Hydrangea7 - Prairie Dropseed5 - Dark Horse Weigela3 - Grow-Low Sumac5 - Double PlayArtisan Spirea5 - Dense Yew5 - Double PlayArtisan Spirea5 - White Knock Out Rose5 - Dense Yew5 - White Knock Out Rose5 - White Knock Out Rose5 - Dense Yew5 - White Knock Out Rose1 - Espresso Kentucky Coffeetree3 - Hackberry4 - Skyline ThornlessHoneylocust1 - Autumn Gold Gingko3 - Espresso Kentucky CoffeetreeREQUIREMENT CHART5 - Invincibelle Ruby HydrangeaTree Installation1L2.0L1.0Shrub Installation2L2.0Perennial and OrnamentalGrass Installation3L2.0LawnLawn2 -Skyline Thornless Honeylocust7 - Double Play Artisan Spiraea7 - Double Play Artisan Spiraea1 - Espresso KentuckyCoffeetree7 - Prairie Dropseed7 - Dark Horse Weigela1 - Accolade Elm3 - Skyline ThornlessHoneylocust1 -Skyline Thornless Honeylocust3 - Hackberry3 - Grow-Low Sumac2 - Autumn Gold Gingko1 - Accolade Elm5 - Purple Bloomerang Lilac3 - Dense Yew5 - Purple Bloomerang Lilac3 - Dense Yew5 - Purple Bloomerang Lilac3 - Invincibelle Ruby Hydrangea3 - Invincibelle Ruby Hydrangea3 - Invincibelle RubyHydrangea3 - Invincibelle RubyHydrangeaStormwater Detention Area1 - Espresso Kentucky Coffeetree1 - Accolade ElmLawn1 - Accolade Elm2 - Hackberry3 - Accolade Elm2 - Skyline Thornless Honeylocust3 - Autumn Gold Gingko3 - Espresso Kentucky Coffeetree2 Accolade Elm3 - Hackberry6 - Hameln Fountain Grass6 - Hameln Fountain Grass2 - Espresso KentuckyCoffeetree6 - Grow-Low Sumac5 - Invincibelle Ruby Hydrangea7 - Double Play Artisan Spiraea7 - Double Play Artisan Spiraea6 - Grow-Low Sumac6 - Hameln Fountain Grass6 - Hameln Fountain Grass6 - Double Play Artisan Spiraea6 - Grow-Low Sumac9 - Dark Horse Weigela5 - Grow-Low Sumac5 - Double Play Artisan Spiraea3 - Invincibelle Ruby Hydrangea DRAW / REVISIONLD/VTReview21JUN2019SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEGas N WashYorkville, IllinoisPROJECT815-254-0091 www.uplanddesign.comPark Planning and Landscape Architecture24042 Lockport St, Plainfield, Illinois 60544ltdProject Number 707© Copyright 2019 Upland Design Ltd.W:\746-Yorkville Gas N wash II\20-ConceptsPLOT: UPLAND 2013LandscapePlanLandscapePlanSCALE:Shrub InstallationN.T.S.d-plant-shrub_12BACKFILL MIXTURE TO BE85% TOPSOIL AND 15%MUSHROOM COMPOST,MIXED THOROUGHLYREMOVE BURLAP FROM TOPHALF OF BALL AND REMOVEALL WIRE AND PLASTICCONTAINERS REMOVE TAGSFROM PLANTS3" DEEP SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCHEXTEND MULCH TO 8" PASTEDGE OF LIMBS ON SHRUBINSTALL BASE OF BALL ORROOT MASS ON EXISTINGSUBGRADE OR TAMPEDTOPSOILTOP OF ROOT BALL SHALLBE AT FINISHED GRADE.SCALE:Perennial & Ornamental Grass Installation1" = 1'-0"d-perennialsBACKFILL MIXTURE TO BE 85%TOPSOIL AND 15% MUSHROOMCOMPOST, MIXEDTHOROUGHLYREMOVE PLASTICCONTAINERS AND TAGSFROM PLANTS PRIOR TOINSTALLEXTEND MULCH AS SHOWNON LANDSCAPE PLAN ANDMINIMUM OF 18" PASTCENTER OF PLANTINSTALL BASE OF POT SOILMASS ON EXISTINGSUBGRADE OR TAMPEDTOPSOILTOP OF POT SOIL SHALL BEAT FINISHED GRADE.12SCALE:Tree InstallationN.T.S.d-plant-tree_12BACKFILL MIXTURE TO BE TOPSOILAS REQUIRED, PLACE ON ALL SIDESOF TREE, EXTEND 12" BEYONDOUTSIDE EDGE OF ROOT BALL.4" HIGH SOIL SAUCER BEYOND EDGEOF ROOT BALL. 6' DIAMETER MULCHRING OR MULCH AS PART OFPLANTING BED.3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOODMULCH. MULCH SHALL NOT TOUCHTREE TRUNKBASE OF BALL SHALL BE PLACEDON UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE ORTAMPED SOIL. TREE SHALL BETRUE AND PLUMB12"ROOT CROWN TO BE AT FINISHGRADE OR 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADEREMOVED ALL CONTAINERS, STRING,WIRE, AND TWINE AT TOP 1/2 OFROOT BALL. REMOVE TAGS ON TREETREE WITH STRONG CENTRALLEADER36"8' MIN.ALL SINGLESTEM TREESNOTE:PULVERIZED TOPSOIL IS NOT TOBE USED FOR TREE BACKFILL3L2.02 220.0" 158"4"24"16.0"24''x72'' LED DISPLAY AREA 36"97.5"141.5" 29"92"129" 248"45"136"24"21"65"92" 176"32"45"32 ft 45"60"45"65 ft 165 ft 30 ft 136"24"62"9"59"114.5"114.5"59"81"42" 24"214"30"7"384.0" 27.5"25"215.5"65.5"60.5"27.5"25"215.5"65.5"60.5"27.5"25"215.5" 141"15"141"15"141"15"141"15"138 ft 45"24"141"286" 286" 636"45"24"141" 636" 220.0" 158"4"24"16.0"24''x72'' LED DISPLAY AREA 36"97.5"141.5" 158" 24"12"48"36"16" 24"48"12"36"6" 30"4"4"4"4"6"36"4"232" 220"97.5"141.5"82" 1411 W. Peterson Avenue, Suite 203 • Park Ridge, IL 60068 • tel 847-698-4438 / fax 847-698-9889 Yorkville IL Jul 17, 2019 page 1 1411 W. Peterson Avenue, Suite 203 • Park Ridge, IL 60068 • tel 847-698-4438 / fax 847-698-9889 Yorkville IL Jul 17, 2019 page 2 1411 W. Peterson Avenue, Suite 203 • Park Ridge, IL 60068 • tel 847-698-4438 / fax 847-698-9889 Yorkville IL Jul 17, 2019 page 3 1411 W. Peterson Avenue, Suite 203 • Park Ridge, IL 60068 • tel 847-698-4438 / fax 847-698-9889 Yorkville IL Jul 17, 2019 page 4 1411 W. Peterson Avenue, Suite 203 • Park Ridge, IL 60068 • tel 847-698-4438 / fax 847-698-9889 Yorkville IL Jul 17, 2019 page 5 1411 W. Peterson Avenue, Suite 203 • Park Ridge, IL 60068 • tel 847-698-4438 / fax 847-698-9889 Yorkville IL Jul 17, 2019 page 6 1411 W. Peterson Avenue, Suite 203 • Park Ridge, IL 60068 • tel 847-698-4438 / fax 847-698-9889 Yorkville IL Jul 17, 2019 page 7 1411 W. Peterson Avenue, Suite 203 • Park Ridge, IL 60068 • tel 847-698-4438 / fax 847-698-9889 Yorkville IL Jul 17, 2019 page 8 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: 208 E. Main Street – Variance Request Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #6 Tracking Number EDC 2019-64 Economic Development Committee – August 6, 2019 Majority Vote Reduction in front yard setback from 30 feet to 20 feet for the purpose of rebuilding a previously existing porch. Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department SUMMARY: The petitioners, Charles and Gayle Ashley, have filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting a reduction in the front yard setback from the required minimum 30 feet from the property line to the building to 20 feet for a residential parcel located at 208 E. Main Street. The property is zoned R-2 Traditional Family Residence District and purpose of the request is to allow for the reconstruction of an attached covered porch, as was part of the original home, to be located within the required front yard. The proposed porch will reflect the established neighborhood character and forward the goals of the recently adopted Neighborhood Design Manual. PROPERTY BACKGROUND: The property, a two-story is located approximately 2 blocks east of IL Rte. 47 (N. Bridge Street) on Main Street surrounded by similar single-family homes in the older residential part of Yorkville. This parcel, as well as the adjacent parcels, was platted as a narrow, deep lot which backs up to wooded open space and the Fox River. This area of the City was developed prior to any modern zoning regulations existed in Yorkville and therefore the structures and parcels in the area may or may not conform to current code standards. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Jason Engberg, Senior Planner Date: July 10, 2019 Subject: PZC 2019-20 208 E. Main Street – Front Yard Setback Variance As currently situated, the nearest distance from the property line to the edge of the home is approximately 29.4’. However, the existing front stoop extends an additional eight feet (8’) into the yard, effectively rendering the front setback at 21.4’, less than the required minimum 30 feet for the R-2 zoning district. Therefore, this property is considered “legally non-conforming” since its non- conformity existed prior to the adoption of the current ordinance. The exhibit below illustrates where the house is located on the parcel. The required front yard is shaded and shows the existing stoop. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The two-story brick residence, as seen in the picture to the right, was originally built circa 1860 with architectural features common to Victoria Stick Style homes. These features include steep gable and side gable rooflines; rectangular windows in a simple pattern of one-over-one; and unusually announced porches with large brackets that form curved diagonal braces. At some point, the front façade of the home was altered to remove the covered porch and the current homes exterior is depicted in the images below. As proposed, the petitioners are seeking to rebuild the one-story porch to the existing front façade of the home in its original location. The porch would extend approximately thirty-two (32) feet across the front plane of the house and project out about eight (8) feet into the front yard, following the line of the existing front stoop. The covered roof of the porch would be approximately ten (10) feet in height and the floor material will be a one inch (1”) thick composite deck. The overall setback will essentially remain at its current distance of 21’-4” if the variance is approved. VARIANCE REQUEST: Section 10-7-1 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance requires all buildings located in the R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District to maintain a minimum front yard setback of thirty feet (30’). Although the current home does not maintain this setback, it is non-conforming to this standard, Section 10-15-3-B-3 states the non-conforming structure can be maintained, repaired or altered but cannot expand or create any additional nonconformities. Therefore, the petitioner is seeking the variance so that they are legally allowed to encroach, expand and alter their home to the newly requested setback of 20 feet and not constrained, now or in the future, by the current non- conforming status. NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN: In February 2019, the City Council adopted the Neighborhood Design Manual, which is geared towards retaining and enhancing the character and livability of Yorkville’s traditional neighborhoods. As part of this non-binding manual, guidelines were established for renovation and new construction with the goal of any repair or reconstruction blending into the fabric of the surrounding neighborhood. Specifically, regarding porches, the Neighborhood Design Manual acknowledges that “the front porch can be a great place to relax and enjoy the breeze on a cool summer evening” and therefore recommends when renovating an existing home in the older parts of town, “care should be taken to preserve or replicate the styling of historic elements…into the new design.” Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as “Traditional Neighborhood Residential” which encourages the current residential character. The petitioners main purpose is to replace the previous porch feature onto their home as it was originally built. They also desire to enhance the character of their home with the addition of this architectural element and “bring back some old-time touches” to the neighborhood, as other homes also have front porches. Furthermore, the variance for the front yard setback is consistent with the established neighborhood frontage and the addition of the requested porch would maintain that line, as illustrated in the aerial below. STAFF COMMENTS Staff is supportive of the request for front yard setback reduction as proposed by the petitioners. The original architecture of the home was designed with a Victorian Stick Style porch, similar to the surrounding residences. Additionally, the property, and most properties within the neighborhood, are legally non-conforming with regards to front yard setbacks, as they were built prior to the modern zoning code. Finally, the proposed porch would not change the character of the street line and is consistent with the recently adopted Neighborhood Design Manual and Comprehensive Plan. Staff is seeking preliminary feedback from the Economic Development Committee in regard to this proposed variance. A public hearing for the variance is tentatively scheduled for the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on September 11, 2019. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Petitioner Application (with attachments) 2. Public Hearing Notice PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PZC 2019-20 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT Charles and Gayle Ashley, petitioners, have filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting a reduction in front yard setback from 30 feet to 20 feet for a residential parcel located at 208 E. Main Street. The purpose of this request is to allow for the reconstruction of an attached covered porch, as was part of the original home, to be located within the required front yard. The real property, zoned R- 2 Traditional Family Residence District, is located east of South Bridge Street (IL Route 47) and immediately south of East Main Street in Yorkville, Illinois. The legal description is as follows: LOT 9 AND THAT PART OF LOTS 5, 6 AND 10 IN BLOCK 22 OF MCCLELLAN’S ADDITION TO BRISTOL DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND SAID EASTERLY LINE EXTENDED, 320.0 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 6; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, 100.0 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY LINE EXTENDED AND SAID EASTERLY LINE, 320.0 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, 100.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE UNITED CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PIN : 02-33-109-006 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT the Planning and Zoning Commission for the United City of Yorkville will conduct a public hearing on said application on Wednesday, September 11, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. at the United City of Yorkville, City Council Chambers, located at 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. The public hearing may be continued from time to time to dates certain without further notice being published. Application and information materials regarding this notice are available for public review and any questions or written comments should be addressed to the United City of Yorkville Community Development Department, City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois. All interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing and will be given an opportunity to be heard. By order of the Corporate Authorities of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. Lisa Pickering City Clerk Ordinance No. 2019-____ Page 1 Ordinance No. 2019-_______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, GRANTING A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 208 E. MAIN STREET (Front Porch) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”) is a duly organized and validly existing non-home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/11-13-5) the Mayor and City Council of the City (the “Corporate Authorities”) may provide for and allow variances to provide relief when strict compliance with the requirements of the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance (the “Zoning Ordinance”) presents a particular hardship; and, WHEREAS, Charles and Gayle Ashley (the “Applicants”), requested to reduce the required minimum front yard setback in the R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District from thirty feet (30’) to twenty feet (20’) for the purposes of constructing an attached porch on their residential property in the front yard that is not permitted pursuant to Section 10-07-01 of the Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, A notice of a public hearing on said application was published and pursuant to said notice the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City conducted a public hearing on September 11, 2019, on said application in accordance with the State statutes and the ordinances of the City; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission made the required written Findings of Fact finding that the variation met the standards in Section 10-4-7C of the Zoning Ordinance and recommended that the variance be granted; and, Ordinance No. 2019-____ Page 2 WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the City of Yorkville have received and considered the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1: That this Ordinance shall apply to the Subject Property legally described as: LOT 9 AND THAT PART OF LOTS 5, 6 AND 10 IN BLOCK 22 OF MCCLELLAN’S ADDITION TO BRISTOL DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 9; THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 9 AND SAID EASTERLY LINE EXTENDED, 320.0 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 6; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, 100.0 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY LINE EXTENDED AND SAID EASTERLY LINE, 320.0 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, 100.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE UNITED CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Commonly known as 208 E. Main Street, Yorkville, Illinois, Property Index Number: 02-33-109-006 Section 2: That a variation pursuant to Section 10-07-01 of the Zoning Ordinance to reduce the required minimum front yard setback in the R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District from thirty feet (30’) to twenty feet (20’) of the Subject Property is hereby granted. Section 3: That the front porch shall be constructed, operated and maintained in accordance with the requirements of the Yorkville City Code and generally located as shown on the attached plat of survey prepared by Phillip D. Young and Associates, Inc. dated May 23, 2005 and made a part hereof as Exhibit A. Section 4: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. Ordinance No. 2019-____ Page 3 Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this _____ day of __________________, 2019. ______________________________ CITY CLERK KEN KOCH ________ DAN TRANSIER ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ ARDEN JOE PLOCHER ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ SEAVER TARULIS ________ JASON PETERSON ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this _____ day of __________________, 2019. ______________________________ MAYOR Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #7 Tracking Number EDC 2019-65 Tactical Urbanism/Planning Program Economic Development Committee – August 6, 2019 Details the proposed Tactical Planning projects Jason Engberg Community Development Name Department 1 SUMMARY Yorkville has taken steps to improve its long-term planning efforts in recent years by completing the 2016 Comprehensive Plan and currently finishing the Downtown Overlay District. These plans provide suggestions on how the City may accomplish its vision in the long-term by providing implementable objectives throughout each of the plans’ horizons. It is the responsibility as Community Development staff to implement the given objectives to ensure that the community’s vision is accomplished. One of the objectives given in the Comprehensive Plan which was further detailed in the Downtown Overlay District, is to pursue “tactical urbanism/planning” efforts in the downtown. Tactical planning provides low-cost, temporary changes to the built environment intended to improve local neighborhoods and gathering places. This memorandum will outline tactical planning concepts, potential projects in Yorkville, and potential future opportunities in the tactical planning field. WHAT IS TACTICAL PLANNING? Typical long term urban planning practices include gathering existing conditions, evaluating goals and visions, creating a roadmap to achieve these goals, and finally a guide to implement the plan. This process is excellent for creating long term success for a community and gives direction for future development. While an excellent process for planning, the amount of time and resources dedicated to these efforts can be intense. Also, the length of time it takes to implement the plan is typically long. Tactical planning offers quicker and affordable solutions which provide a base for long term improvements. The purpose of tactical planning is to create a sense of place and provide activity by utilizing underused areas within a public space immediately. It may be executed by City departments, local advocates, or businesses. Some examples of tactical planning include pop-up cafes/parklets, food trucks, chair bombing, or street painting (for additional information please see the attached “Tactical Urbanism 2” document). Overall, tactical planning efforts provide short-term commitments and realistic expectations. It is a great way to start incremental change and provide something tangible that residents and guests can see immediately. Providing better public spaces improves the quality of life for residents while incentivizing private investment in the area. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Jason Engberg, Senior Planner CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Date: July 11, 2019 Subject: Tactical Urbanism/Planning Program 2 TACTICAL PLANNIG EXAMPLES From top left to bottom right: turf parklet; painted shared roadway; street yoga; overhead lanterns. PROJECT BACKGROUND Yorkville’s decision to explore the possibility of providing tactical planning projects throughout the downtown began with suggestions from the draft Streetscape Master Plan and a contest being held by the College of New Urbanism (CNU) in 2018. During its drafting, the Streetscape Master Plan provided several different ideas for public improvements including murals, public art, painted intersections, and parklets. During this process, staff was already prioritizing which of the ideas could be implemented by the City and how much capital and time it would take to complete. As their charter states, the CNU is an organization of people which dedicates itself to the restoration of existing urban centers and towns within coherent metropolitan regions, the reconfiguration of sprawling suburbs into communities of real neighborhoods and diverse districts, the conservation of natural environments, and the preservation of our built legacy. In 2018, the CNU held a contest to provide funding for tactical planning projects. Applicants were given a chance to present their ideas and the winner would be given $5,000 for implementation. Staff utilized the ideas in the Streetscape Master Plan and proposed three separate tactical planning projects. Unfortunately, Yorkville did not win the competition. While the City did not win the implementation money, there is still value in these projects and $2,500 has been budgeted for this fiscal year for implementation. 3 Original location map for tactical planning projects POTENTIAL PROJECTS For the original project, three places in the downtown were chosen for three separate projects: a beach box behind nearby businesses; life size chess near the dam; and kickball billiards at the Van Emmon Activity Center. Over the past year, some of these projects have changed in design and scope as potential issues were discussed. The final projects and locations that the City is proposing include: • Beach Box – along the river behind nearby businesses • Life Size Chess – near the dam and pedestrian bridge to the island • Concrete Cornhole – on the hill at the Van Emmon Activity Center The following pages will provide insight and basic information about each of these projects. 4 Beach Box Location: Fox River Existing Location Planned Improvements SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENTS: • Shallow sandbox into the ground • Concrete wall painted with mural • Chairs for sitting and enjoying the view • Large umbrella for shade POTENTIAL ISSUES AND MITTIGATION: Potential Issues Mitigation People will steal the umbrella. The umbrella will be weighted and steaked in the ground beneath the beach box. People will steal the chairs. Similarly, the chairs will be chained to an underground weight or affixed to the ground in a semi-permanent way What about ADA compliance? The beach box will be recessed into the ground and be level with the adjacent walkway. The sand will be shallow to allow for easy movement. 5 Life Size Chess Location: Fox River Dam Existing Location Planned Improvements SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENTS: • Different paver patio blocks arrange to look like a chess board • Plastic chess pieces purchased online POTENTIAL ISSUES AND MITTIGATION: Potential Issues Mitigation The pieces will blow away in the wind. Each piece will be weighed down by pouring sand into the base of each piece. People will steal the pieces. Possibly. If this is a problem, the board could always be switched to checkers which would be less desirable to steal and easier to replace. 6 Concrete Cornhole Location: Van Emmon Activity Center Existing Location Planned Improvements SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENTS: • Permanent cornhole set on the grass • Potential for bench seating if budget allows POTENTIAL ISSUES AND MITTIGATION: Potential Issues Mitigation Are we going to provide bags? No. Users will have to bring their own bags which will deter any nuisances with nearby traffic. The ground isn’t level. While the ground isn’t perfectly level, the boards will be able to be shimmed and poured level to each other. 7 POTENTIAL FUTURE PROJECTS: These three projects will be the initial step into a larger improvement downtown. There are many long-term plans for the area, but sometimes these small projects can provide interest and excitement for bigger and better things. For example, if we install one set of cornhole boards and the popularity is high, residents might request more sets in the downtown. Or if the beach box is well received and residents want more places to sit, the City could install hammocks all along the river. The hope is that these projects will entice residents, businesses, and visitors to come up with their own ideas for improvements and let the City know what they want to see. This type of participation in their own community is what gives residents a sense of ownership and pride in their community. INSTALLATION AND FUNDING: As stated previously, the City has allotted $2,500 for these tactical planning projects. Installation of these projects is expected to be completed by City staff members. There is potential for volunteers to help with the construction of these projects, such as the boy scouts or local tradesmen. For example, the City could partner with the High School Art program to paint and design the mural on the beach box wall, or the boy scouts could help install the paver blocks for the chessboard. Currently, the plan is for members of staff to install these projects. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff is seeking input from the Economic Development Committee on these potential tactical planning projects. After review by the committee, staff will have a resolution drafted and it will be reviewed by the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Tactical Urbanism 2 Short Term, Long Change NEX T G E N ERAT IONOF NEW U R B A NISTSNEXTGEN 2TacticalURBANISM Short-Term Action | | Long-Term Change tac·ti·cal adj: \tak-ti-kəl\ 1. of or relating to small-scale actions serving a larger purpose 2. adroit in planning or maneuvering to accomplish a purpose MIKE LYDON, Project Editor/Author DAN BARTMAN, Layout/Copy Editor TONY GARCIA, Contributor RUSS PRESTON, Contributor RONALD WOUDSTRA, Contributor Tacticians TacticalURBANISMiv “The lack of resources is no longer an excuse not to act. The idea that action should only be taken after all the answers and the resources have been found is a sure recipe for paralysis. The planning of a city is a process that allows for corrections; it is supremely arrogant to believe that planning can be done only after every possible variable has been controlled.” - Jaime Lerner Architect, urbanist, former mayor of Curitiba, Brazil TacticalURBANISMv A NOTE ON VOLUME 2! During the fall of 2010 I traveled to New Orleans to take part in a retreat with my friends and colleagues who sometimes self-identify as the Next Generation of New Urbanists. While staying there in the Marigny, I shared my notes on a number of seemingly unrelated, but similar small- scale initiatives happening in the streets of New York, San Francisco, Portland, and Dallas. Per usual, they challenged me to better articulate my ideas and offered to help. Tactical Urbanism: Short-term Action, Long-term Change, Volume 1 was then assembled during the spring of 2011 and uploaded from 38,000 feet while flying to Bangkok—as inspirational a city as any for the tactical urbanist. The intent of the publication was to place an umbrella over a growing number of short-term, often self-funded efforts that were demonstrably leading to long-term change. The term “tactical urbanism” is inspired by a June 2010 faslanyc blog post that discusses the pedestrianization of Times Square. In the introduction the author describes the DOT’s efforts as “tactical interventions,” and “hacks.” It was my first exposure to such terms applied to the built environment and it seemed to perfectly describe not just the Greenlight for Broadway project, but a groundswell of other low-cost, un- semi- and fully-sanctioned interventions. Volume 1 was uploaded to my company’s website and to the Pattern Cities blog. In less than two months the document was downloaded more than 10,000 times, the maximum number allowed with our free SCRIBD account. We knew that the publication struck a chord with a whole new generation of citymakers. Sensing a need to further discuss and share tactical initiatives from across the country, we partnered with numerous organizations in the fall of 2011 to produce the first Tactical Urbanism Salon. Approximately 150 people from around the country (and Canada) discussed their projects, listened to others, and drank free beer. Prior to the Salon we promised attendees that we’d release Volume II. However, with several other projects in the works, that promise turned out to be a bit too ambitious. Nonetheless, from Weed Bombing and Depave, to Ad-Busting and Camps, Tactical Urbanism Volume 2 presents updated information, new insights, new photos, and 12 additional short-term actions inspiring long- term change. I hope you find the initiatives presented herein as inspirational as they are practical. MIKE LYDON Editor / Author The Street Plans Collaborative March 2, 2012 TacticalURBANISM1 THE CHALLENGE Cities are in a constant state of flux, which may explain we planners are often preoccupied with control. Large-scale transformations, such as stadiums, muse- ums, large waterfront parks, and convention centers are all big-ticket items with measurable curb appeal (for some). Yet, such projects require a substantial invest- ment of time, as well as a deep reserve of political, social, and fiscal capital. Moreover, the long-term economic or social benefit cannot be guaranteed. In the pursuit of equitable progress, citizens are typically invited to engage in a process that is fundamen- tally broken: rather than being asked to contribute to incremental change at the neighborhood or block level, residents are asked to react to proposals they often don’t understand, and at a scale for which they have little con- trol. For better or worse, this often results in NIMBYism of the worst kind. Surmounting the challenges inherent to these “public” processes continues to prove difficult. Fortunately, cities were not always made this way. We do have alternatives. TACTICAL URBANISM Improving the livability of our towns and cities commonly starts at the street, block, or building scale. While larger scale efforts do have their place, incremen- tal, small-scale improvements are increasingly seen as a way to stage more substantial investments. This approach allows a host of local actors to test new concepts before making substantial political and financial commitments. Sometimes sanctioned, sometimes not, these actions are commonly referred to as “guerilla urbanism,” “pop-up urbanism,” “city repair,” or “D.I.Y. urbanism.” While exhibiting several overlapping character- stics, “tactical urbanism,” is a deliberate approach to city- making that features the following five characteristics: • A deliberate, phased approach to instigating change; • An offering of local ideas for local planning chal- lenges; • Short-term commitment and realistic expectations; • Low-risks, with a possibly a high reward; and • The development of social capital between citizens, and the building of organizational capacity between PARK(ing) Day participants temporarily reclaim an on-street parking space for a more productive use. Credit: Parking Day flickr pool TacticalURBANISM2 public/private institutions, non-profit/NGOs, and their constituents. EXPERIMENTATION INFORMS DESIGN Case studies from across North America reveal the benefit of taking an incremental approach to the pro- cess of city building—long-term change often starts with trying something small. Upon implementation, results may be observed and measured in real time. In this way, tactical urbanism projects intentionally create a laborato- ry for experimentation. Or, to paraphrase professor Na- beel Hamdi, they allow for the making of plans without the preponderance of planning. When such experiments are done inexpensively, and with flexibility, adjustments may be made before moving forward with large capital expenditures. Indeed, there is real merit in a municipality or developer spending $30,000 on temporary plaza before investing $3,000,000 in changes that are permanent. If the project doesn’t work as planned, the entire budget is not exhausted and future designs may be calibrated to absorb the lessons learned from what is surely a particular and dynamic context. If done well, such small-scale changes may be conceived as the first step in realizing lasting change. Thus, tacti- cal urbanism is most effective when used in conjunction with long-term planning efforts that marry the urgency of now with the wisdom of patient capital. If included as part of a public planning process, tactical urbanism may more quickly build trust amongst disparate interest groups and community leaders. Indeed, if the public is able to physically participate in the im- provement of the city, no matter how small the effort, there is an increased likelihood of gaining increased pub- lic support for more permanent change later. Involving the public in the physical testing of ideas may also yield unique insights into the expectations of future users and the types of design features for which they yearn; truly participatory planning must go beyond drawing on flip charts and maps. Finally, using tactical urbanism to activate those plans already sitting on the shelf may recover the mo- mentum gained during the actual planning process and move some of the most realistic or exciting ideas closer to fruition. Tactical urbanism can be used to simply build public awareness, to identify a small but pressing issue. Recently in Baltimore, Maryland a “guerilla crosswalk” was painted across a busy street with inexpensive white paint and rollers. Although the city typically removes unauthorized signs and pavement markings in short or- der, the temporary improvement directly communicated the need, and a real desire from the public for better pe- destrian infrastructure. The crosswalk has since become permanent. Similarly, the Toronto-based Urban Repair Squad maintains a website that gathers images of D.I.Y. urban repairs in the city’s public spaces. They recently featured images of bicycle symbols painted on streets indicating the need for future extensions of the city’s bicycle net- work. In an increasing number of instances, municipali- ties follow the lead of their citizens by more permanently implementing the short-term, low-budget livability im- provements initiated by citizen-activists. In other cases, those working within city hall are taking the lead. WHY NOW? While many of the tactics profiled herein are new, the city- and place-making process we now call tac- tical urbanism is not (see pgs. 4-5). Indeed, the develop- ment of human settlements has always included, if not required incremental and self-directed action aimed to- wards increasing social capital, commercial opportunity, and urban livability. In many developing cities and coun- tries, this remains the only way forward. It is only recently that the triumvirate of cheap oil, easy financing, and government regulations, like Euclid- ean zoning, has dulled the spirit of the North American tactical urbanist. We attribute the new wave of tactical projects, which run along a continuum of unsanctioned to sanctioned efforts (see pgs. 7), to three recent and overlapping trends: 1. The Great Recession 2. Shifting demographics Temporary experiments can test physical improvements prior to implementation. Credit: Edward Erfurt IV TacticalURBANISM3 3. The Internet as a tool for building the civic economy First, a benefit of the recession is that it slowed the North American growth machine. This effectively forced citizens, city departments, and developers to take matters into their own hands, get creative with project funding, and concentrate on smaller, more incremental efforts. This has occurred while more and more people— especially the young and well educated—have continued to move into once forlorn walkable neighborhoods.This cohort includes retirees, who are also interested in re- making their chosen neighborhoods. Interestingly, some of these young people are also moving into government leadership positions as the baby boomers retire. Finally, the culture of sharing tactics online has grown tremendously and is becoming more sophisticat- ed. Thanks to web-based tools, a blogger can share some- thing tactical in Dallas and have it re-blogged, tweeted, facebooked etc. in dozens of cities within minutes. The most industrious tactical urbanists, such as Team Better Block, Rebar, and Depave, are using the web as a plat- form for sharing free how-to manuals aimed at helping you bring their tactics to your town. Such a trend is an example of what Britain’s National Endowment for Sci- ence, Technology and the Arts (NESTA) calls the ‘civic economy’ — the spirit of entrepreneurship combined with the aspiration of civic renewal. WHY HERE AND NOT THERE? Theoretically, tactical urbanism can be applied to the arterials, parking lots, and cul-de-sacs of America. Yet, the best examples are consistently found in compact towns and cities featuring an undervalued/underutilized supply of walkable urban fabric. We believe this calls at- tention to the limited social, economic, and physical re- The Great Recession Shifting Demographics The Internet as a Tool for Building the Civic Economy TacticalURBANISM siliency found in sprawling, auto-centric environments. It seems that human-scaled places, where social capital and creativity are most easily catalyzed, are a pre-req- uisite for tactical urbanism. The larger moves and de- sign techniques, such as those highlighted in the Sprawl Repair Manual and Retrofitting Suburbia might provide more appropriate first moves in dealing with America’s unwalkable suburbs. The rise in tactical urbanism may be attributed to three recent and overlapping trends. Can this be chairbombed? How does a parklet add value if there is no on-street parking or sidewalks? Can you build a better block if there is no coherent block structure? Credit: Unknown TacticalURBANISM4 PatternCITIES A handful of cities continually establish urban development paradigms that others readily follow. These cities, which we call Pattern Cities, aren’t always the progenitors of innovation, nor are they necessarily Global Cities. Rather, they are the first to adapt ideas 1914 NYC launches the Play Streets program 1950 Play Streets spread to London, England 1965 Seattle starts first Open Streets initiative 1970 San Francisco artist Bonnie Ora Sherk introduces Portable Architecture project, a foreunner of Park(ing) Day 1973 Guerilla Gardening efforts start in NYC 1997 City Repair adopt intersections in Portland 2001 First Pop-Up Retail event held in London 2005 Park(ing) Day develops in San Francisco 2006 Programmed, Bogotá-styled Open Streets initatives spread to North America 2006 Pavement to Plazas program starts in NYC 2007 Depave program launched in Portland, OR 2007 Site Pre-Vitalization used for Hercules Market in Hercules, CA Tactical TIMELINE Select Patterns of Influence 2007 Sao Paulo, Brazil bans billboards, inspires Ad- Busters around the world 2009 Pavement to Parks begins in San Francisco 2010 Build a Better Block started in Dallas 2010 DoTank Chair Bombs the Streets of Brooklyn 2010 NYC rebrands San Fran’s Pavement to Parks as Pop-Up Cafes 2011 City Point developers use Site Pre- Vitalization at Brooklyn’s Dekalb Market 2011 Guggenheim Museum opens its traveling T Town Hall, the Guggenheim Lab 2011 San Francisco launches the Parkmobile 2011 Activists begin Weed Bombing Miami streets 2012 Grand Central Park, Biscayne Parkway bring insta-parks to downtown Miami at a meaningful scale and/or time in history. In the age of the Internet, new patterns spread faster than ever before. Tactical urbanism is but one pattern and it’s being adopted in cities across the United States and beyond. Learn more at http://patterncities.com TacticalURBANISM5 TacticalURBANISM40 1500s Traveling Book Sellers begin setting up infor - mal “pop-up” shops along the Seine 1649 Book sellers banned at Pont Neufe, later rein- stated 1789 “Bouquiniste” appears in French dictionary 1859 City permits Bouquinistes at fixed points along the Seine, regulates amount of space allowed, charges registration fee 1930s Box dimensions are fixed, regulated by City 1993 Jacque Chirac signs law standardizing new box size 2007 Declared UNESCO World Heritage site 2012 300,000 books, 900 boxes, 240 sellers, along 3km of prime Seine real estate Tactical TIMELINE Les Bouquinistes Les Bouquinistes in Paris, France, demonstrate that tactical urbanism is nothing new. Beginning in the 16th century, unsanctioned booksellers began congregat- ing along the banks of the Seine to hawk the latest best- sellers. However, much like brick and mortar restau- rants denounce today’s food trucks, physical bookshop owners complained loudly enough to have the booksell- ers banned in 1649. Not to be deterred, les bouquinistes proved so popular that the city had to eventually allow, their presence. However, regulations confined them to specific locations and stipulated that each “shop” must collapse into a box at day’s end. In 2007 the area occupied by Les Bouquinistes was designated as a UNESCO World Heritage site, which makes this tactic one of the slowest, if not the most lauded, examples of tactical urbanism. Les Bouquinistes. Credit: Charles Simond, La vie parisienne à travers le XIXe siècle, Paris, E. Plon, Nourrit et cie, 1900, p. 458. What began as an unsanctioned use of public space in the 16th century has become a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Credit: EventSeekr.com TacticalURBANISM6TacticalURBANISM42 The boxes of Les Bouquinistes. Credit: Acscosta via Wikipedia TacticalURBANISM7 Unsanctioned TacticalUrbanism Sanctioned Park(ing) Day Pop-Up Shops Food Carts/Trucks Mobile Vendors Site Pre-Vitalization Temporary Retail Pop-Up Civic Forum Intersection Repair Bike Parking Build a Better Block Guerilla Gardening Chairbombing Ad Busting Local Activists - Comunity Groups - Artists - Open Streets Pavement to Plazas Play Streets Street Fairs Pop-Up Cafes City Agencies - Mayor’s Office - BIDs - Hybrid Non-profits - Entrepreuners - Developers - Tacticstacticians THE TACTICAL URBANISM SPECTRUM Tactical urbanism projects can be placed along a spectrum of unsanctioned to sanctioned efforts. Many examples in this guide began as unsanctioned grassroots interventions that proved so successful that they soon became sanctioned or permanent. The Depave program, for example, began with neighborhood activists but has transformed into a non-profit funded by the City of Portland and the EPA. This is how short-term action creates long-term change. This is tactical urbanism. VOLUME 2 Two dozen tactics are included in this, the second survey of tactical urbanism projects. While not compre- hensive, and mostly limited to the North American con- text, the work described herein presents numerous op- portunities to transform our towns and cities into better places to occupy together. If you have additional tactics to add, please send them to info@streetplans.org Brainstorming the tactical spectrum at the Project Lodge. Credit: Payton Chung The Project Lodge at CNU 19 in Madison, WI. Credit: Aurash Khawarzad TacticalURBANISM42 Because there should be one... Credit: Team Better Block Tactics OPEN STREETS PLAY STREETS BUILD A BETTER BLOCK PARK(ING) DAY GUERILLA GARDENING POP-UP RETAIL PAVEMENT TO PLAZAS PAVEMENT TO PARKS POP-UP CAFES DEPAVE CHAIR BOMBING FOOD CARTS/TRUCKS SITE PRE-VITALIZATION POP-UP TOWN HALL INFORMAL BIKE PARKING INTERSECTION REPAIR AD-BUSTING RECLAIMED SETBACKS PARK MOBILE WEED BOMBING MOBILE VENDORS MICRO-MIXING PARK-MAKING CAMPS Ten Twelve Thirteen Fourteen Sixteen Seventeen Eighteen Twenty Twenty One Twenty Two Twenty Four Twenty Six Twenty Seven Twenty Eight Thirty Thirty One Thirty Two Thirty Four Thirty Five Thirty Six Thirty Eight Thirty Nine Forty Forty Two DoTank TacticalURBANISM10 Savannah, GA Winnipeg, MB Cleveland, OH Seattle, WA OPEN STREETS SUMMARY MAP - 2005 OPEN STREETS SUMMARY MAP - 2011 TacticalURBANISM11 open STREETS PURPOSE: To temporarily provide safe spaces for walking, bicycling, skating and social activities; promote local economic development; and raise awareness about the detrimental effects of the automobile on urban living. LEADERS: City departments Politicians Advocates Non-Profits SCALE: City || District || Corridor FACT: 50 of the 70 known North American open streets initiatives began within the last three years. Open Streets initiatives are increasingly common in cities seeking innovative ways to meet environmental, social, economic, and public health goals. Open streets are often referred to as “ciclovía,” which in Spanish trans- lates literally as “bike path.” The origin is largely thought to be Bogotá, Colombia, a city known worldwide for being a leader of the ciclovía/open streets movement. However, before there was Ciclovía in Bogotá, there was “Seattle Bicycle Sundays,” which first launched in 1965, predating Bogotá’s ciclovía by nearly a decade. While the benefits of Open Streets initiatives are widely recognized, perhaps the most tangible benefit is the social interaction and activity that develops—thou- sands of people of all ages, incomes, occupations, reli- gions, and races have the opportunity to meet in the pub- lic realm while sharing in physical or social activities. In doing so, participants develop a wider understanding of their city, each other, and the potential for making streets friendlier for people. The resulting vibrancy therefore enables people to experience their city’s public realm in a different way, which helps build broader political support for undertak- ing more permanent pedestrian, bicycle, and other liv- ability improvements. In this way, open streets are a tool for building social and political capital, while having very real economic impacts for businesses, vendors, and orga- nizations along the chosen route. Perhaps Waterloo, ON City Councilor, Melissa Durrell, said it best when describing her city’s Car Free Sunday initiative: “This is about bringing people into the core.” Madison, Wisconsin’s Ride The Drive initiativeconsistently draws 20,000 - 25,000 participants. Credit: Mike Lydon The Open Streets Project Guide. Credit: Street Plans and Alliance for Biking & Walking Atlanta’s Streets Alive! initiative brings people together. Credit: Mike Lydon TacticalURBANISM12 Play STREETS PURPOSE: To create safe spaces for people of all ages to be social and active. LEADERS: Neighborhood / Block Associations Advocates City departments SCALE: Street || Block FACT: Many city neighborhoods lack adequate park and open space. Play Streets fill this need by providing a safe space for recreation and community interaction. “Play streets,” popular in New York City and London, re-purpose the public right-of-way for recre- ational activities. In essence, play streets create a public playground within a space formerly used for the move- ment and storage of private automobiles. They often occur seasonally and are typically located adjacent to schools or in neighborhoods where open space is scarce. When implemented in low-income neighborhoods, they may be paired with farmers’ markets or underutilized school playgrounds, which can have a multiplier effect. In New York City, a ‘play street’ is made possible when 51% of the residents living on a one-way residen- tial block sign a petition and offer it to their local police and transportation officials, who then send it to the lo- cal Community Board for review. If approved, the City provides youth workers to oversee the program. Approxi- mately 75% of these initiatives are organized by the New York City Police Athletic League, which began organiz- ing play streets in 1914. New York’s Jackson Heights neighborhood dem- onstrates how an incremental approach may bring forth permanent change. In 2008 and 2009 a single block of 78th street (located next to a school, between North- ern Boulevard and 34th street) was closed to motor- ists on Sundays-only during the spring, summer, and fall months. Instantly loved by community members, the block was then closed in July and August to motor vehicle traffic every day during the following year. Suc- ceeding once again, the play street expanded to include the month of September in 2011 so that public health officials could study how the street closure works when school is in session. If deemed successful by the City, the street will become permanently closed to motor vehicles, while remaining fully open to people. A London play street. Credit: streetplaylondon.blogspot.com In Jackson Heights, car-free space creates carefree play space. Credit: Clarence Eckerson Play streets create playgrounds where they don’t currently exist Credit: New York Times TacticalURBANISM13 PURPOSE: To promote livable streets and neighborhood vitality. LEADERS: Local Advocates Local Businesses SCALE: Street || Block || Building FACT: Fort Worth’s Better Block Project was “built” using only $500 worth of materials. Today, some of the changes proposed are being made permanent by the City of Forth Worth. Local community activists in the Dallas neigh- borhood of Oak Cliff launched the Build a Better Block project. Spearheaded by Go Oak Cliff, the organization relied upon cheap or donated materials, and the work of many volunteers to transform a single underutilized urban block. In short, Build a Better Block encourages local activists and property owners to temporarily activate vacant storefronts and public space. In Dallas, the first effort utilized food vendors and sidewalk cafe tables as places to congregate. “New York style” cycle tracks painted along the curb pushed cars outward to reduce the number of travel lanes, which effectively slowed traf- fic. Finally, native landscaping and street furniture helped improve the block’s sense of place. To date, the Build a Better Block effort has had a substantial spin-off effect: the momentum gained from the project led to the permanent use of formerly under- utilized retail space. Additionally, the process helped ad- vocates in Dallas and Forth Worth garner a commitment from their leaders to permanently implement complete street improvements. It has also spurred a new consul- tancy firm, called Team Better Block. They are now ad- vising other organizations and cities to use the low-cost, low-risk process to to incite change. As a touchstone of the tactical urbanism move- ment, the Better Block approach continues to capture the attention of urbanists and advocates. Similar efforts have now taken place in Forth Worth, Oklahoma City, Philadelphia, Memphis, and beyond. In Oyster Bay, NY, a similar strategy deployed by DoTank and Street Plans utilized “pop-up shops” and a farmers’ market, which have since become permanent. This includes Billy Joel’s 20th Century Cycles, a motor- cycle showroom that has become a regional draw. Joel participated in the initial event and was struck by the potential of the space he now rents. build a blockBETTER The Fort Worth, TX Build a Better Block effort led to permanent change. Credit: fortworthology.com Before and after: Dallas Build a Better Block Credit: Go Oak Cliff In Oyster Bay, Billy Joel rehabbed a vacant storefront for his motorcycle collection, which is now a regional draw. Credit: Mike Lydon TacticalURBANISM14 A street temporarily transformed. Credit: Art Monaco Portland via my.parkingday.org TacticalURBANISM15 PARK ING DAY( ) PURPOSE: To reclaim space devoted to automobiles, and to increase the vitality of street life LEADERS: Advocates Non-Profits Community Groups SCALE: Street || Block FACT: In 2011, 975 on-street parking spaces were temporarily reclaimed in 165 cities, 35 countries, and across six continents. PARK(ing) Day is an annual event where on- street parking spaces are converted into park-like public spaces. The initiative is intended to draw attention to the sheer amount of space devoted to the storage of private automobiles. While its provenance is sometimes debated among advocates in New York and San Francisco, re- search reveals that Bonnie Ora Sherk, a San Francisco- based artist, first began converting pavement to parks with her 1970 project entitled “Portable Architecture.” Nonetheless, the outward marketing of the ini- tiative first occurred in 2005 when the interdisciplinary design group Rebar converted a single San Francisco parking space into a mini-park. The group simply laid down sod, added a bench and tree, and fed the meter with quarters. Instantly garnering national attention, PARK(ing) Day has spread rapidly amongst livable city advocates and is thought to be the pre-cursor to New York and San Francisco’s parklet and pavement to parks programs. At its core, PARK(ing) Day encourages collabo- ration amongst local citizens to create thoughtful, but temporary additions to the public realm. Once reclaimed, parking spaces are programmed in any number of ways; many focus on local, national, or international advocacy issues, while others adopt specific themes or activities. The possibilities and designs are as endless as they are fun. While participating individuals and organizations operate independently, they do follow a set of established guidelines. Newcomers can pick up the PARK(ing) Day Manifesto, which covers the basic principles and includes a how-to implementation guide. A PARK(ing) Day installation. Credit: flickr user iomarch In 2010 a group of non-profit and neighborhood organizations hosted a pot-luck park(ing) day after party below the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway. Credit: flickr user Brodowski Bonnie Ora Sherk’s 1970 Portable Architecture project. Credit: Bonnie Ora Sherk TacticalURBANISM16 Guerilla GARDENING PURPOSE: To introduce more greenery and gardening into the urban environment LEADERS: Neighborhood Advocates SCALE: Block || Lot FACT: Guerilla Gardening first began in 1973 when New York City activists threw condoms with local seeds, water, and fertilizer into vacant lots First coined by Liz Christy and her Green Guer- rilla group in 1973, guerilla gardening is now an inter- national movement. Although there are many permuta- tions, guerrilla gardening is the act of gardening on public or private land without permission. Typically, the chosen sites are vacant or underutilized properties in urban areas. The direct re-purposing of the land is often intended to raise awareness for a myriad of social and environmental issues, including sustainable food systems, urban storm- water management, improving neighborhood aesthetics, and the power of short-term, collaborative local action. When applying the tactic to contested land, guerilla gardeners often take action under the cover of night, where vegetables may be sowed, or flower gardens planted and cared for without running the risk of being caught. Guerilla gardening is an excellent tactic for no- ticeably improving an urban neighborhood. Often times, gardens are cared for years after they are first created, illegally. Indeed, the first garden started in a vacant New York City lot by the Green Guerillas became so loved that volunteers and the New York City Parks Depart- ment now maintain it. This exemplifies how unsanc- tioned short-term action creates sanctioned, long- term change. San Francisco’s Sunday Streets Credit: ??? Guerilla Gardening offers an outlet for creative energy. Credit: Loralee Edwards, Lethbridge Guerilla Gardening Green Guerillas at work. Credit: Guerilla Gardening Development Blog TacticalURBANISM17 POP UP RETAIL PURPOSE: To promote the temporary use of vacant retail space or lots. LEADERS: Developers Local Entrepreneurs Artists Corporations SCALE: Street || Building FACT: ‘Pop-up retail,’ was coined in late 2003 by trendwatching.com. The concept of pop-up urban improvement initiatives has since been applied to dozens of other similar temporary interventions. Apparel companies looking to generate brand awareness first utilized the pop-up retail tactic. At first, such efforts made temporary use of vacant retail spaces by creating an event-like atmosphere for a limited time— sometimes even just one day. For retailers, the focus is generally on marketing or proof-of-concept, rather than producing sales. Companies large and small, property owners, art- ists and community organizations quickly adopted and calibrated the concept for a wide range of purposes. To be sure, pop-up retail is moving beyond the common seasonal holiday store and the trendy one-off designer brand sales event to becoming a sanctioned community revitalization technique. Main streets with vacant store fronts, oversized parking lots, and underutilized public spaces are increasingly being used as local incubators for a seemingly endless number of temporary to permanent commercial and community uses. For example, in Oakland, CA an urban planner and restaurant owner are collaborating in producing Pop- uphood, a three-block stretch of short-term lease pop-up stores intended to revitalize the downtown through new business incubation. In this way, the pop-up trend re- flects the new economy where aligning the interests of property owners and local entrepreneurs is happening in a more nimble and creative way. Finally, the interest and public exposure pop- ups generate by way of their temporary nature provide a powerful tool for sparking long-term change. Successful pop-up stores often earn the right to stay, creating a win- win for the property owner, occupant, and neighborhood. Manifesto Bicycles is one of six stores in Oakland’s Popuphood. Credit: Oakland North Melbourne’s Rebecca Walk features pop-up retail under a rail Viaduct. Credit: Mike Lydon The solar powered KiosKiosk is a pop-up store that can be setup almost anywhere. Credit: KiosKiosk - TacticalURBANISM18 The iconic, but temporary changes in Times Square will be soon be upgraded and made permanent. Credit: New York City Department of Transportation TacticalURBANISM19 PURPOSE: To reclaim underutilized asphalt as public space without large capital expenditure LEADERS: City Departments Business Improvement Districts SCALE: Street || Block FACT: Following the implementation of the New Times Square pedestrian plaza, injuries to motorists and their passengers declined by 63%. Similarly, pedestrian injuries decreased 35%, even while pedestrian volumes increased Pavement to Plaza programs, popularized recently in New York City, but echoed in cities like San Francisco, seemingly define sanctioned tactical urbanism. These interventions typically start by using temporary, inexpensive materials to re-assign excessive motor vehicle space for the use of pedestrians and/or bicyclists. Because these efforts do not require a large outlay of capital, public spaces are able to appear almost overnight. While the city funds the design and the construction, partners from the local business or advocacy community are usually asked to operate, maintain, and manage the new plazas. Following the immediate closure of Times Square, the centerpiece of New York’s highly successful “Greenlight for Midtown” street improvement project, Tim Tompkins of the Times Square Alliance realized that people might want to sit somewhere. So, he bought 376 folding chairs for $10.74 each and “instantly — millions of people have a new way of enjoying the city.” By taking this experimental “pilot project” approach using temporary materials, the City and public-at-large are able to test the performance of each new plaza without wasting scarce public resources. When successful, the plazas transition into a more permanent design and construction phase, which is happening currently in many of New York City’s first generation of pilot plazas and sustainable street projects. pavement plazas TO Broadway at Columbus Circle: Before and after. Credit: New York City Department of Transportation Putnam Triangle Putnam Triangle: Before and after. Credit: New York City Department of Transportation TacticalURBANISM20 PURPOSE: To reclaim underutilized asphalt as public space without large capital expenditure LEADERS: Local Restaurants Municipalities Transportation Departments Business Improvement Districts SCALE: Street || Block FACT: Startup costs for a “parklet” in San francisco include a $1,000 application fee, and a $650 fee for the removal of parking meters. A $221 fee is then charged annually. Parallel Park, a parklet in Vancouver, BC cost $18,000 to design and construct. The similar Pavement to Plaza projects carried out in New York City inspired San Francisco’s Pavement to Parks program. Using many of the same techniques— moveable tables and chairs, painting asphalt, and the in- stallation of inexpensive planters and re-purposed stone bocks, municipal officials were able to quickly establish a formal program that increased the balance of public space. The Pavement to Parks program is a collabora- tive effort between the San Francisco Mayor’s Office, the Department of Public Works, the Planning Department, and the Municipal Transportation Agency. The low- cost “parklets” are now found in more than 20 locations throughout the city. As in New York, the City views each parklet as a laboratory for testing the potential of a more perma- nently designed public space. The materials are meant to be temporary and the design malleable should changes be desired during the trial period. A typical parklet consists of a platform that sits flush with the sidewalk. Each one is built in the place of two or three parking spaces. In most cases, they in- clude seating and various amounts of greenery and occa- sionally include bicycle parking and/or tables to serve as outdoor dining areas for nearby restaurants or cafes. The cost of constructing a parklet is typically covered by an individual business or several businesses that recognize the ability to attract customers. Privately sponsored or not, parklets are part of the public realm and completely open to the public at large. pavement parksTO Some parklets feature bicycle parking. Credit: flickr user Jeremy Shaw Vancouver, BC’s “Parallel Park.” Credit: Facebook user Parallel Park One of San Francisco’s many parklets. Credit: flickr user Jeremy Shaw (PARKLETS) TacticalURBANISM21 POP UP- CAFES PURPOSE: To promote outdoor public seating in the parking lane (during the warm months) and to promote local businesses LEADERS: City Departments Local Restaurants Business Improvement Districts Local Designers SCALE: Block || Street FACT:: Parking spaces used for Pop-Up Cafes in NYC are leased from the Department of Transportation Inspired by New York City’s Pavement to Pla- za program, San Francisco began its own Pavement to Parks effort, which includes parklets (page 19). That riff on the concept was the imported back to New York an re-named pop-up cafés, which have become specialized tactic used where public outdoor seating is sorely needed. Similar to how things are set up in San Fran- cisco, New York City’s program requires that the busi- ness sponsoring the cafe must agree to cover the design, construction and maintenance costs. If such agreement is reached, the City’s Department of Transportation pro- vides technical assistance and may even make street im- provements, such as applying traffic markings or placing safety bollards around the cafe. In cities with a short supply of public space and a need for more publicly accessible seating, pop-up cafés are fast becoming a valued addition to the public realm. When successful, they act as placeholders for a time when city sidewalks can be permanently expanded. Out- side of New York City and San Francisco, parklets and pop-up cafés may be found in Long Beach, Los Angeles, and Vancouver. A narrow sidewalk limits the possibility of outdoor seating. Credit: DNAinfo.com Trading parking space for outdoor seating improves the public realm. Credit: DNAInfo.com Pop-up cafes are sponsored by private businesses, but are public spaces open to anyone Credit: DNAinfo.com TacticalURBANISM22 Depavers assess their work. Credit: Brent Wojahn/The Oregonian TacticalURBANISM23 DEPAVE PURPOSE: To reduce storm water pollution and increase the amount of land available for habitat restoration, urban farming, tree planting, native vegetation, and social gathering LEADERS: Neighborhood Activists Non-Profits SCALE: Lot || Block FACT: Since 2007, over 700 volunteer have replaced more than 94,100 square feet of unnecessary asphalt with permeable gardens and community green space. As a result, 2,221,115 gallons of stormwater is diverted annually. While impervious surfaces are a fact of urban life, the paving of millions of acres contributes to numerous environmental problems, namely the polluting of our waterways through stormwater runoff. Portland’s all-volunteer Depave organization seeks to incrementally reduce stormwater pollution by surgically removing unnecessary pavement. To do so, Depave transforms impervious driveways and parking into community green spaces and gardens that naturally mitigate stormwater runoff pollution. Depave began as an unsanctioned, self-organized neighborhood effort in 2007, but has blossomed into an influential non-profit organization that has received grants from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen- cy, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Patagonia, and the Multnomah Soil and Water Con- servation Districts. It is also supported by many other businesses, organizations, government departments and schools. Depave therefore provides a great example of how short-term unsanctioned initiatives can become sanctioned, long-term efforts within a very short amount of time. Over the past four years Depave has turned near- ly 100,000 thousand square feet of parking lots into ex- panded school yards, community gardens, food forests, and pocket parks. While this work has reduced millions of gallons of stormwater runoff, it has also built strong ties between neighbors and the city in which they live. If you want learn more, Depave written a helpful how-to guide describing their process. Clear instructions. Credit: Picasa user DepavePDX Depaving in action. Credit: Picasa user DepavePDX The Fargo Forest Garden replaced 3,000 square feet of asphalt. Credit: Picasa user DepavePDX TacticalURBANISM24 Chairbombing. Credit: Aurash Khawarzad TacticalURBANISM25 Chair BOMBING PURPOSE: To improve the social well-being of neighborhoods by salvaging waste materials and activating the public realm. LEADERS: Community Activists Local Property Owners Small Businesses SCALE: Street || Building FACT: By taking discarded shipping pallets and converting them into quality public seating, the urban waste stream can be reduced, and streets made more welcoming. Whether to rest, socialize, or to simply watch the world go by, increasing the supply of public seating al- most always makes a street, and by extension, a neigh- borhood, more livable. Chairbombing is the act of removing salvage- able material from the local waste stream, and using it to build public seating. The entire process of building and placing the chairs requires attention to the design and construction, but also a thoughtful approach as to where they are needed most, and where they would be able to support existing social activity, or serve as a catalyst for community gathering. In general, chair bombing calls attention to the general lack of public seating in the urban environ- ment. It also indicates locations where further physical improvements may be made by a municipality, property owner, retail tenant, and/or other change agents. Chair placement begins by retrieving discarded materials such as shipping pallets from dumpsters, con- struction sites, or other locations where solid waste is found. The pallets can be disassembled and then reas- sembled for seating. DoTank, a Brooklyn-based interdisciplinary collective, has placed chairs in six locations throughout northern Brooklyn. While the bombings are often done in conjunction with outdoor events, the first effort has resulted in permanent seating at Blue Bottle Coffee in Brooklyn’s Williamsburg neighborhood. Collecting discarded shipping pallets. Credit: Ted Ulrich Design Chairs placed adjacent to Brooklyn’s Blue Bottle Coffee. Credit: Aurash Khawarzad Permanent seating added by Blue Bottle Coffee. Credit: Aurash Khawarzad TacticalURBANISM26 food CARTS / TRUCKS PURPOSE: To provide low cost food, incubate small businesses, and activate undertutilized sites. LEADERS: Entrepreneurs Municipalities SCALE: Block || Lot FACT: Portland’s food carts are regulated as normal restaurants, including semi- annual inspections. They also pay rent for the off-street parking spots they occupy. From construction sites to industrial parks, hospitals to local neighborhood centers, cities large and small continue to witness a surge in street food vending activity. Long before the Twitter-induced food truck craze, noted urbanist William H. Whyte acknowledged that street food is a magnet for human activity. Food carts and trucks not only stimulate entrepreneurial activity, they serve a critical role in the activation of the public realm. Indeed, few people know where people tend to congregate as well as a good food vendor, as his or her success relies upon high pedestrian volumes. In turn, a good food vendor, or groups of vendors quickly become an additional destination within already successful places of congregation. In Portland, Oregon, food carts take on a unique character. Typically housed in stationary trailers, RVs, or self-made shacks, the City encourages vendors to cluster their fare. With each new arrival, each food vendor’s prosperity often increases. And because they mask surface parking lots, they activate otherwise harsh street edges that repel human activity. In many cases, porches, bar stools and garden seating are added, resulting in an even more inviting streetscape. Interestingly, Portland’s food carts are regulated as normal restaurants, including semi-annual inspections. They also pay rent for the off- street parking spots they occupy. Today, the city’s most successful food cart entrepreneurs are able to move into more permanent locations, which allows opportunity for the next operator to take their place in a succession of small business development. From Los Angeles to Miami, smart cities not only lower the barrier to entry, but also nurture such businesses because they reflect and contribute to the strength of the local economy, and enhance the city’s sense of place. Food carts mask surface parking lots in downtown Portland. Credit: Better Cities & Towns (New Urban Network) Food carts line the central square in Seaside, FL. Credit: Mike Lydon Vendors activate a park edge in Brunswick, ME Credit: Mike Lydon TacticalURBANISM27 Site PRE-VITALIZATION PURPOSE: To temporarily activate a (re)develop- ment site. LEADERS: Municipalities Developers Citizen Activists Business Improvement Districts SCALE: Block || Lot || Building FACT: Red Barn, the developer behind the temporary Hercules Market Hall, sees the project as market research on “what people look for, what they want to eat, the goods they want, and how long they will stay” for a more permanent project they call Market Town. Site Pre-vitalization is the temporary re-activa- tion of a previously inactive, underutilized parcel of land. This tactic brings a variety of art, food, and retail uses to a single location. Typically, this is done to generate needed revenue for the land owner/developer, raise the community’s awareness about the site’s long-term po- tential, and to build community while supporting local entrepreneurs. Site pre-vitalization uses often include public markets, art exhibitions and studios, community festivals, beer gardens, micro-retail opportunities, flea markets, and other temporary programs capable of “pre-vitalizing” a site before more permanent building is possible. By ac- tivating a site during the planning, approvals, and financ- ing stages, a vacant site can therefore provide low-cost community building and economic opportunities while a more formal transition occurs, from inactive parcel of land to a fully redeveloped and programmed addition to the town or city. Site Pre-vitalization is a relatively new tactic and one that that is largely a private sector response to the restrictive commercial lending standards now im- posed by banks. Thus, the tradeoff between the tempo- rary uses—markets, beer gardens, ping-pong tables, art shows, vegetable growing etc.—and the realization of the final long-term private development has not yet been ad- dressed. We’ll be watching this tactic closely as Proxy, Dekalb Market and others like it move from temporary installations to permanent development. The Dekalb Market entrance in downtown Brooklyn Credit: Mike Lydon Proxy is a temporary placeholder for a long-term development plan. Credit: Inside Scoop SF Hercules Market. Credit: Dan Gregory TacticalURBANISM28 The BMW Guggenheim Lab, New York City. Credit: Bob Arihood TacticalURBANISM29 pop up TOWN HALL- PURPOSE: To provide a temporary forum for discussions of civic importance LEADERS: Philanthropic Organizations Community Coalitions Activists SCALE: Block || Building FACT: The Guggenheim Lab will travel to nine major world cities in six years. A pop-up town hall provides an informal, non- government sponsored venue for serious civic discourse and the exchange of ideas. While pop-up town halls often make use of underutilized city spaces, such as vacant lots or storefronts, they can also be held in a myriad of other venues. Pop-up town halls should capitalize on locations where a healthy dose of civic discussion is already occurring; for instance, some pop-up town halls are organized in tandem with conferences, exhibitions, festivals and other events. The BMW Guggenheim Lab captures the spirit of this tactic. The Lab, which is designed to temporarily re-imagine an overlooked city space as a civic forum, is a migratory town hall that is traveling between nine different cities. The carbon fiber structure is to be disassembled and reassembled in each of the nine cities—it is sometimes referred to as a “traveling toolbox.” The objective is to provide a space that brings people of many disciplines together brings in a discussion on the future of their city. The organizers of the BMW Guggenheim Lab call their invention “part urban think thank, part community center, and part public gathering space” which are the basic characteristics of any pop-up town hall. The BMW Guggenheim Lab site before construction began, Credit: wallpaper.com Over 100 free events were hosted at the Lab. Credit: Mike Lydon A temporary cafe was built adjacent to the Lab. Credit:© flickr user archidose TacticalURBANISM30 informal BIKE PARKING PURPOSE: To increase the supply of bicycle parking where needed. LEADERS: Community Activists Local Businesses Property Owners SCALE: Street || Block || Building FACT: Every parked bicycle belongs to a potential customer. At the intersection of tactical urbanism and transportation infrastructure is the creation and installation of informal bike racks. The lack of parking options in many cities is inspiring activists, including progressive businesses and “enlightened” property own- ers, to take it upon themselves to install various types of temporary and semi-permanent solutions. Groups like DoTank have built bike racks and tested them on lamp posts in Williamsburg, with the intent of providing bike parking while also making a statement about the city’s lack of bicycle parking. Busi- nesses such as ¿Por Que No? taqueria in Portland, have also taken it upon themselves to install bike parking in front of their store as a tactic for attracting and servic- ing customers from the city’s growing bicycle commu- nity. Finally, property owners, such as Green Desks in Brooklyn’s DUMBO neighborhood, have affixed “bike rails” directly adjacent to the entrance of the building to meet growing demand. While not all informal bike racks designs are practical or secure for long-term use, they do indicate demand. Smart cities will leave the well-designed racks alone, while replacing the more poorly conceived tempo- rary solutions with higher performing city racks. To meet demand, this property owner installed a long bike rail. Credit: Ronald Woudstra Small bike rails provide bicycle parking at a popular beer garden. Credit: Mike Lydon Valet event parking by The Street Plans Collaborative. Credit:Mike Lydon TacticalURBANISM31 intersection REPAIR PURPOSE: To repurpose neighborhood street intersections as community space. LEADERS: Neighbors Activists Community Organizations Home Owners Associations SCALE: Street || Block FACT: City Repair and local residents refer to intersection repair as an exercise in “Village Building.” Intersection repair reclaims neighborhood streets as public gathering places. The initiative first began in Portland, OR and continues to be stewarded by City Repair, a local placemaking group. While the brightly painted intersections communicate to drivers that they are entering a place of neighborhood importance, it’s the process of making and maintaining the repaired intersections that matters most. Indeed, once the initial reclamation occurs, neighbors often take it upon themselves to further enhance their new public gathering place with benches, community bulletin boards, gardens and art positioned prominently at the corners. In some cases, less temporary paint has given way to bricks and cobblestones. While the design elements are important, “repaired intersections” encourage neighbors to interact more frequently and give them a nearby place to care about outside their homes. Intersection repair provides another great example of how tactical urbanism initiatives move along the continuum, from unsanctioned activity to a fully sanctioned program. Unsurprisingly, Portland’s Bureau of Transportation did not initially allow intersection repair. Regardless, communities continued to transform implement them anyway. As is the case with many unsanctioned tactics, the City no longer stands in the way. In fact, the Bureau of Transportation has an official City Repair liaison. This liaison helps coordinate the permitting, street closures, and oversees some of the designs to aid in the success of each project. Intersection repair projects may now be found in communities across the United States. Intersection repair is a placemaking and community building tactic. Credit: Flickr user Sara Dent This is what an intersection repair master plan looks like. Credit: Sara Dent An intersection repair project in Los Angeles, CA. Credit: Los Angeles Eco-Village Blog TacticalURBANISM32 A billboard turned swingset. Credit: Broken City Lab TacticalURBANISM33 ad -BUSTING PURPOSE: To reduce visual pollution within the public realm. LEADERS: Activists Municipal Leaders SCALE: Corridor || Block || Building FACT: Citizens of São Paulo were amazed at the architecture of their city once billboards blocking building facades were removed. In 2007, one of Brazil’s largest cities adopted a radical ban on outdoor advertising. São Paulo’s “Lei Cidade Limpa” or Clean City Law was a project led by mayor Gilberto Kassab and gave the world an example of what a major city could look like without being overrun by advertising. In the United States, marketing and advertising has pervaded the public realm to such a degree that ac- tivists and civil servants have begun to develop and im- plement creative tactics combating the daily onslaught of consumerism. While the goal of ad-busting is to improve the aesthetic quality of public spaces, it also sends the message that the public realm should not be used un- abashedly for the selling and consumption of commer- cial products. Groups such as the Public Ad Campaign and DoTank have developed physical methods of altering existing ads to reflect a different message—one that highlights local art and/or community events and assets. DoTank’s digital community billboard project, called WeSee.Us, allowed passersby to anonymously submit live photos from their smart phones. The submitted pho- tos were displayed in real-time on an empty billboard, which allowed individuals to share their own visuals with the community at large. The advertising content generated during the WeSee.Us installation quickly became community ori- ented, focusing on the people and events taking place in the neighborhood rather than on the products corpora- tions urge us to buy. The WeSee.Us installation. Credit: Aurash Khawarzad Ad-busting. Credit: Credit: This is Not an Ad What if... Credit: This is Not an Ad TacticalURBANISM34 reclaimed SETBACKS PURPOSE: To create a more engaging streetscape by activating the space between the structure and the sidewalk. LEADERS: Property Owners Activists SCALE: Lot FACT: Most municipal zoning codes require setbacks between the street and the primary structure, which often creates awkward and underutilized semi- public spaces. Setback reclamations intentionally activate the underutilized, semi-public space found between the pub- lic right-of-way (typically the sidewalk) and a property owner’s principal structure. The distances are uniformly mandated in municipal zoning codes and homeowner as- sociations often limit their use beyond ornament. Awk- ward setback distances of 20 feet or more are especially common in single-family neighborhoods built after the 1920s. Increased setback distances broke the traditional relationship between street, building, and building owner. As a result, most social activity is found in the backyard, not the front. Setback reclamations range from illegal struc- ture extensions to temporary programming to commu- nity gardening. Such tactics help diminish the real and perceived distances found between the structure and the sidewalk. If done well, reclamations can effectively cre- ates a more engaging and social neighborhood street en- vironment. Free poems make for an engaging experience in this Streamboat, CO neighborhood. Credit: Mike Lydon Front setbacks provide a perfect opportunity to grow food. Credit: flickr user Shira Golding TacticalURBANISM35 park MOBILE PURPOSE: To add more neighborhood green space and to further activate streets with public seating. LEADERS: City Departments Business Owners Business Improvement Districts Neighborhood Organizations SCALE: Street || Block FACT: Each parkmobile costs approximately $6,000. One of the most appropriate uses of tacti- cal urbanism is to jumpstart the implementation of long-term vision plans. Parkmobiles, designed by San Franciso-based CMG Landscape Architecture, were installed in the summer of 2011. They are a direct re- sponse to the neighborhood’s desire for more green space, as voiced in San Francisco’s Yerba Buena Street Life strategic plan. Fashioned from custom dumpsters, each parkmobile fits within a single vehicular parking space and contributes to “a vision and road map for a next generation of public space in the Yerba Buena District.” Other initiatives featured in the plan include widened sidewalks, mid-block crossings, and the tacti- cal conversion of alleys into plazas or shared streets. At present there are six parkmobiles being moved periodically around the neighborhood. Each unit contains a different type of vegetation, including Tasmanian Tree Ferns, Strawberry Trees, Yuccas, and shrubs that attract birds and butterflies. In doing so, they highlight the importance of an agreeable pedes- trian experience and recognize the importance that vegetation and seating play in creating an attractive environment for pedestrians. Overall, the initiative pays homage to San Francisco’s longstanding tactical tradition of improv- ing the larger urban landscape in small and fluid ways. Parkmobiles are, well, mobile. Credit: Dwell via Miyoko Ohtake A parkmobile located outside of SPUR’s urban center. Credit: Dwell via Miyoko Ohtake A parkmobile working as intended. Credit: Mark Boster/Los Angeles Times. TacticalURBANISM36 tactic NAME FAST FACT: blah blah blah LEADERS: blah, blah, blah SCALE: City || District || Corridor || Street || Block || Building PURPOSE: blah, blah, blah blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah... Weed bombing on an overgrown corner in downtown Miami (Not photoshopped). Credit: Grant Stern TacticalURBANISM37 weed PURPOSE: To draw attention to blighted neighborhoods and to incite action in cleaning them up. LEADERS: Neighborhood Associations Artists Activists SCALE: Street || Block FACT: Weed bombing began in Miami, FL under the cover of darkness, but sheds light on public and private property negligence. Weed bombing is the act of converting overgrown weeds into works of street art. Inspired by other forms of ‘tactical bombings,’ downtown Miami resident and business owner, Brad Knoefler enlisted other neigborhood activists and artists to spray paint weeds in bright colors. Knoefler, who is also the founder of the Omni Parkwest Redevelopment Association (OPRA), is a vocal critic of the various large-scale redevelopment plans slated for his Omni Parkwest, and the lack of maintenance efforts. He is also known to take action into his own hands. “We used to cut the weeds ourselves,” say Knoefler, “but it’s much more beneficial to beautify them and convert them into street art. Unlike traditional graffiti, weed bombing doesn’t damage private or public property and has immediate benefits to our quality of life.” While Knoefler undertook the effort in creative protest, he’s found little resistance from the city and downtown development authority. Still, according to one newspaper article, Knoefler plans to keep bombing the weeds until a more concerted, sanctioned city effort is made. BOMBING Weed bombing can make overgrowth look more like flowers. Credit: Kerry McLaney A weed bomb just north of downtown Miami. Credit: Kerry McLaney Weed bombs highlight disparities in where public and private maintenance dollars are spent. Credit: Kerry McLaney TacticalURBANISM38 Mobile VENDORS PURPOSE: To offer needed commercial services, activate public spaces, and help citizens earn income. LEADERS: Micro-Entrepreneurs SCALE: Street || Block FACT: Street Vendors selll a variety of goods besides food, including art, photographs, clothing and various other merchandise. Vending is often a second source of income for urban households. There is nothing more tactical than helping small-scale entrepreneurs get a footing in the local econ- omy. As with food carts, small-scale street vendors at- tract people, fill small commercial voids, and help give life to public spaces. Overseas, and increasingly in North American cities, inventive street vendors are using a vari- ety of low-cost mobile means to transport and sell their wares. Bicycles in particular have become quite popular in some cities. Hiroyuki Shinohara, a Japanese architect has conducted a study of the various roles bicycle-based vending plays in the streets of Chinese cities. He found that bicycles were being used as mobile bookshops, ice cream vending stations, mobile garbage collectors, and even as mobile water tanks. Because vendors play a key role in animating the various spaces of a city, municipal governments should make regulations simple, clear, and readily available in multiple languages. The Center for Urban Pedagogy’s Vending Power! A Guide to Vending in New York City does a fantastic job explaining the city’s confusing mobile vending regulations to a wide audience of current and future vendors. The vendor stores his newstand in the basement entrance of a nearby apartment building Credit: Mike Lydon Vending Power! A Guide to Street Vending in New York City Credit: Candy Chang/Center for Urban Pedagogy This Brooklyn newspaper vendor sets up a mobile stand every morning by the Clinton-Washington subway entrance on Fulton Street. Credit: Mike Lydon TacticalURBANISM39 Micro- MIXING PURPOSE: Too incubate new businesses and sustain existing ones through the co-location of mutually supportive uses. LEADERS: Entrepreneurs Property Owners Business Improvement Districts SCALE: Block || Building FACT: The simplest form of retail micro- mixing is the coffee shop inside the book store, something corporations figured out long ago. By mixing multiple businesses in a single retail space, micro-mixing provides entrepreneurial shop owners an opportunity to mitigate the high overhead costs associated with opening a new venture. This tactical retailing technique combines complimentary uses and activities that can be used by existing retailers as well as cooperative and startup incubator spaces. The best use of the micro-mixing technique can create some of the most exciting and memorable shopping experiences. The success of large format bookstores in the 1990’s and 2000’s illustrated the mutually beneficial relationship that exists between a coffee shop and a bookstore. These two uses together, a latte and a new book, seem to fit together naturally. Today, more unconventional and perhaps more exciting mixes are emerging. In Denver, Salvagetti Bicycle Workshop has included an espresso bar on its sales floor. In New York, Barbershops are selling clothing, and jewelry stores are selling Vietnamese sandwiches. In Providence, a craft co-op store is running a gallery out of the back of house space and a coffee shop is selling potted plants and gardening supplies. All of these operators are creatively maximizing the return on their space’s floor area by working together with complimentary retailers. At its core, micro-mixing is a “buddy system” economic development strategy that helps small businesses grow incrementally. By using clever merchandising and efficient space planning, existing retail spaces can quickly be adapted to handle multiple users or businesses. Thus, micro-mixing provides an easy opportunity to test new ideas. If successful, micro-mixing tenants can one day strike out on their own. Salvagetti Bicycle Workshop Credit: Panoramio user chachafish Happy Coffee Espresso Window Credit: Jonathan Shikes TacticalURBANISM40 The construction of Grand Central Park took one month. Credit: Grand Central Park TacticalURBANISM41 Park-MAKING PURPOSE: To increase the supply of park space by quickly reclaiming undertutilized parcels of vacant land and parking lots. LEADERS: Activists Artists City Departments Business Improvement Districts Neighborhood Organizations SCALE: Lot || Block FACT: Miami’s Grand Central Park is a five-acre park that was built in 30 days. While it’s exciting that the tactic of PARK(ing) Day has led to the development of parklets and pavement to plazas programs, larger public spaces are still needed in many urban neighborhoods. A new response to this challenge is the tactic of park-making, which utilizes the techniques of PARK(ing) Day and deploys them at a larger scale. In Miami, FL, local activists are partnering with private sector companies and government entities to transform some of the city’s most overlooked opportunity sites into sizeable parks. The 5-acre Grand Central Park, pictured at left, is the brainchild of the Miami’s most notorious Weed Bomber, Brad Knoefler (see pgs 36-37). Knoefler, and his colleagues at the Omni Parkwest Redevelopment Association (OPRA) took it upon themselves to transform the former Miami Arena site into a much needed park space. After securing a local grant, OPRA procured pro bono landscape design services and signed a multi-year lease with the property owner. Fees generated from programmed events, concerts, and food vendors will sustain the maintenance of the park and pay the lease obligation. Built in early 2012, and in just 30 days, the park has already been a huge success. Building on this model is Bayfront Parkway, a one-week installation led by Street Plans and the engineering firm C3TS. While several a downtown plans have called for transforming Biscayne Boulevard’s median parking lots into a green doorstep for downtown Miami, action has never been taken...until now. At the time of publication, the one-block park intervention is currently underway and generating support from stakeholders to follow through with the long-term park plan. In Miami, Biscyane Boulevard’s medians are dedicated parking lots. Credit: Ana Bikic Biscayne Parkway’s exercise equipment is a popular attraction. Credit: Ana Bikic Biscayne Parkway transformed one parking lot into a park. Credit: Ana Bikic CAMPS PURPOSE: To create or take part in the temporary occupation of space, often with an eye toward creating permanent change. LEADERS: Activists Protesters Refugees Government NGOs SCALE: Lot || Building || Block || District FAST FACT: In his book Camps: A Guide to 21st Century Space, author Charlie Hailey organizes 103 types of camps into three broad categories: Autonomy, Control, and Neccessity. Whether for protest, military action, recreation, or necessary shelter, camps provide a ubiquitous cross- cultural reference, and not just one of outdoor occupation. While pervasive the cultural understanding of camps hifts on an almost daily basis. The much debated meaning of the Occupy movement is one of our most recent examples. According to Hailey, the process of urbanization often begins with informal camps that eventually move along a continuum, from temporary to permanent, from being unsanctioned to sanctioned places of habitation. By their nature, camps capably adapt to various conditions and therefore serve well in the transitonal phases of development. In this way, the connections between camp and city is nothing new. Indeed, many of the world’s great cities began as Roman military camp outposts, including Vienna, Barcelona, and Prague. A less sexy example is that of the trailer park where the possibility of mobility is often a misnomer—mobile homes don’t usually move, they evolve over time and very much stay rooted in place. Camps of all types, demonstrate how the short- term action of temporarily occupying space, often leads to incremental, permanent change. A park in Port-Au-Prince, Haiti before the earthquake. Credit:New York Times. Same park in Port-Au-Prince, Haiti as post-earth quake relief camp. Credit: New York Times Occupy Camp. Credit:Chuck Wolfe TacticalURBANISM43 SHARE YOUR TACTICS! This tactical urbanism survey includes several strategies employed by individuals, local community groups, and municipalities. However, it’s by no means exhaustive. The Tactical Urbanism Project is only going to get better through reader contributions. If you or someone you know has an addition to make or would like to organize a Tactical Urbanism Salon, please EMAIL INFO@STREETPLANS.ORG or share it on the Tactical Urbansim Facebook page. The Tatical Urbanist’s decision tree. Credit: Fast Company “...in order to do something big, to think globally and act globally, one starts with something small and one starts where it counts. Practice, then, is about making the ordinary special and the special more widely accessible — expanding the boundaries of understanding and possibility with vision and common sense. It is about building densely interconnected networks, crafting linkages between unlikely partners and organizations, and making plans without the usual preponderance of planning. It is about getting it right for now and at the same time being tactical and strategic about later. This is not about forecasting, nor about making decisions about the future. But it is about the long range, about making sure that one plus one equals two or three, about being politically connected and grounded, and about disturbing the order of things in the interests of change.” - Nabeel Hamdi Author, Small Change: About the Art of Practice and the Limits of Planning in Cities TacticalURBANISM45 TACTICAL URBANISM The Street Plans Collaborative Pattern Cities Tactical Urbanism Salon The Interventionists Toolkit Tactical Urbanism Facebook page Grist The New York Times The Atlantic Cities More Grist OPEN STREETS The Open Streets Project PLAY STREETS NYC Play Streets Play Street Becomes a Sanctuary Reclaiming The Residential Street As Play Space PARK(ING) DAY Parkingday.org BUILD A BETTER BLOCK Build a Better Block Fort Worth Better Block Project A New Face for an Old Broad GUERRILLA GARDENING Guerilla Gardening.org Wikipedia PAVEMENT TO PLAZAS NYC Plaza Program PAVEMENT TO PARKS Pavement to Parks Program POP-UP CAFES NYC DOT Pop-UP Cafes CHAIR BOMBING DoTank POP-UP RETAIL Trendwatching DEPAVE Depave Streetfilms: Depaving Day! FOOD CARTS Portland Food Carts The Architectural Maturation of Portland Food Carts SITE PRE-VITALIZATION Dekalb Market Proxy Hercules Market: What Comes Next? Box Park Shoreditch POP-UP TOWN HALL BMW Guggenheim Lab INTERSECTION REPAIR City Repair Streetfilm AD-BUSTING Public Ad Campaign PARK MOBILE New Forms of Public Space: Parkmobile WEED BOMBING Weed Bombing MOBILE VENDORS The Street Vendor Project Custom Bike Urbanism MICRO-MIXING PARK-MAKING Bayfront Parkway CAMPS Camps: A Guide to 21st Century Space Sources TacticalURBANISM46A project of Locke’s Department of Urban Betterment. Credit: Design Taxi TacticalURBANISM47 Your Guide to How to 1 Planning Site PlanCall Before You Digneighbors and PermitsReuse and DisposalPossible Soil Contamination 2 Tool SeleCTion Safety FirstHand ToolsPower Tools 3 BReaking! Conventional Techniquesnatural Techniques 4 Soil ReHaBiliTaTion/ReSToRaTion Raised BedsRemoving and Replacing SoilUtilizing Plants to Break up SoilPhytoremediation 5 PoRTlanD ReSoURCeS THE PARK(ing) DAYMANUAL A Primer on User-Generated Urbanism and Temporary Tactics for Improving the Public Realm Introduction: The Ideas Behind PARK(ing) Day In urban centers around the world, inexpensive curbside parking results in increased traffi c, wasted fuel and more pollution. The strategies and values that generate these conditions are no longer sustainable, nor do they promote a healthy, vibrant urban human habitat.1 It’s time to rethink the way streets are used and to re-imagine the possibilities of the urban landscape! A metered parking spot is an inexpensive short-term lease for a plot of precious urban real estate. What is the range of possibilities for creativity in a space usually dedicated to the storage of a private vehicle? Motivated by the desire to activate the metered parking space as a site for creative experimentation, political and cultural expression, and unscripted social interaction, Rebar offers PARK(ing) Day as a prototype for open-source urban design, accessible to all. In response, thousands of people around the globe—working independently of Rebar but guided by common core principles—have created hundreds of “PARK” installations and formed an annual international event. Urban inhabitants worldwide recognize the need for new approaches to making the urban landscape, and realize that converting small segments of the automobile infrastructure—even temporarily—can alter the character of the city. From public parks to free health clinics, from art galleries to demonstration gardens, PARK(ing) Day participants have claimed the metered parking space as a rich new territory for creative experimentation and activism. The event continues to expand virally, over the Internet and by word of mouth. Since its inception in 2005, PARK(ing) Day has blossomed into a global experiment in remixing, reclaiming and reprogramming vehicular space for social exchange, recreation and artistic expression. The project 1 See Donald Shoup, The High Cost of Free Parking, (Amer. Planning Assn., 2011) The vast majority of outdoor urban space is dedicated to the private vehicle, while only a fraction of that land is allocated to open space for people. TacticalLIBRARY TacticalURBANISM48 NEX T G E N ERAT IONOF N EW U R B A N ISTSNEXTGEN Tactical Urbanism Vol. 2 Release Onsite Public Space Intervention FEATURING Short Film Screenings Keynote Presentations RSVP info@streetplans.org Music, Drinks, Networking Facebook Next American City Magazine Next Generation of New UrbanistsProject for Public SpacesTeam Better Block PRESENTED BY A SALON on OCTOBER 15TH 2011During the CONGRESS OF COLLECTIVESIn LONG ISLAND CITY, NYC Flux Factory39-31 29th St., Queens NY Short Term Action // Long Term Change DESIGN BY SUPPORTED BY New Urban NewsPlayLabStreetfilmsTransit Miami Social BicyclesPattern Cities TreeKIT Transportation Alternatives CNU New York Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #8 Tracking Number EDC 2019-66 Downtown Landscape Hill Project Economic Development Committee – August 6, 2019 Majority Approval Bid Request for Downtown Landscape Hill project consisting of a retaining wall sign and base landscaping budgeted for $50,000. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Summary Recommendation to go out for bid on the budgeted approved Downtown Landscape Hill project. The approved budget of $50,000 will cover a limited scope of the overall concept plan, consisting of the retaining wall sign and surrounding base landscaping. Background In April/May 2016, City staff engaged HR Green to prepare a downtown landscape plan that beautifies and improves the visual character of the corridor along IL Route 47 in the downtown to soften the expanse of roadway, create a pedestrian scale experience of greenery and ultimately contributes to an overall sense of place when entering Downtown Yorkville. The area proposed for this landscape feature is the approximately 75 ’wide, 560’ long and 20’ tall embankment slope on the west side of IL Route 47/Bridge Street located between Van Emmon and Fox Streets. The final proposed concept plan prepared by HR Green, as seen on the following page, illustrates a meandering dry creek bed parallel to IL Route 47 flanked by pockets of perennial and/or annual plants for year-round color. The most prominent detail of the plan is the great retaining wall/sign feature facing IL Route 47 constructed of a limestone veneer with individually mounted letters reading “YORKVILLE”. Clusters of plantings near the base of the wall sign will again enhance year-round interest and small stature flowering trees will provide a sophisticated backdrop. Other amenities offered as part of the proposed landscape plan is a scenic overlook in the northwest corner with a pergola structure, benches and fence details which match other decorative fencing in the City along the river walk for continuity and to create a sense of place. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: July 31, 2019 Subject: Downtown Landscape Hill – Request for BID While the estimated total cost of the full proposed landscape hill plan is approximately $566,000.00, staff is proposing a scaled-down scope of the plan to fit the $50,000 budgeted in FY 20, as follows: 1. Installation of Landscaping approx. $2,975.00 a. Five (5) Ornamental Trees b. Fifteen (15) shrubs 2. Installation of Hardscape approx. $19,725.00 a. Limestone out-croppings b. Lighting 3. Installation of 35’ of Retaining Wall/Sign Feature approx. $27,300.00 Total approx. $50,000.00 These estimates were based upon engineer’s opinion of probable construction costs provided by HR Green with the 2016 concept plan and should be consistent with current costs for materials and labor. BID Request As proposed in the attached draft bid packet, the City is requesting design-build bid proposals for the landscape hill project. The design component of the bid proposal will consist of the responder providing two (2) to three (3) limestone veneer sign wall concepts; while the build component will be cost estimates for the complete installation of the sign wall and landscape materials, in accordance with the approved plan. Staff aims to have the bid proposal posted in August 2019 with responses received by Monday, September 23, 2019. Once the bids have been submitted, staff proposes to provide all sign wall concepts to the Economic Development Committee for final recommendation to City Council for final bid award. Based upon this schedule, it is anticipated the bid will be awarded in fall 2019 and all work completed by May 1, 2020. Recommendation Staff recommends approving the attached Downtown Landscape Hill project bid packet for publication. Should you have any questions regarding this request, staff will be available at Tuesday night’s meeting for further discussion. INVITATION TO BID THE DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF THE DOWNTOWN HILL LANDSCAPE PROJECT Deadline: Monday, September 23, 2019 11:30 a.m. Local Time 2 | Page UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS LEGAL NOTICE INVITATION FOR BID The United City of Yorkville, Illinois will accept sealed bids for the Design and Installation of the Downtown Hill Landscape Project. Sealed bids will be received at the address listed below until Monday, September 23, 2019, at 11:30 a.m. local time. Bids will be publicly opened and read aloud at this time. All proposals should be addressed to: United City of Yorkville Re: (Contractor name) Sealed Bid Downtown Hill Landscape Project Attention: Carri Parker, Purchasing Manager 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Proposal packets are available online at http://www.yorkville.il.us. The link can be found under the Business Tab-Bids & RFPs. Additional packets may be picked up at the United City of Yorkville City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL 60560. Please contact the Purchasing Manager to schedule a time to pick up the packet. Any questions or interpretation request regarding this Legal Notice or actual bid specifications shall be directed to Carri Parker, Purchasing Manager in writing at cparker@yorkville.il.us, not less than ten (10) business days prior to the scheduled bid opening date. The contractor shall at all times observe and conform to all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the Federal, State, and City which may in any manner affect the preparation of bids or the performance of the contract. Carri Parker Purchasing Manager 3 | Page INTRODUCTION Purpose of Request: The United City of Yorkville’s Comprehensive Plan Update, approved in 2016, identified key planning goals and strategies for creating a “vibrant city” within the downtown district. Revitalizing Yorkville’s downtown is a high priority to its residents and business owners within the area. Therefore, the City is seeking an experienced landscape vendor, offering design-build services, to propose and install a retaining wall identification sign and surrounding plantings on a berm within the center of the downtown. This placemaking and streetscape design treatment will enhance the visual appearance, pedestrian environment and functionality of downtown Yorkville. Project Description: The City is requesting design-build bid proposals for the landscape hill project in the Downtown area, according to the Project Specifications and Plans contained herein (the “Project”). The subject project area is located on a grass embankment, approximately 75 feet wide, 560 feet long and 20 feet tall, on the west side of Illinois Route 47/Bridge Street, beginning at the southwest corner of IL Rte. 47 and East Van Emmon Street and continuing south. The property is owned by the Illinois Department of Transportation (“IDOT’) and is maintained by the United City of Yorkville. The design component of the bid proposal will consist of no less than two (2), but up to three (3) limestone veneer sign wall design concepts (3.5’ height x 35’ linear feet width) with costs for construction and complete installation of the landscape materials in accordance with the approved plan. All work will be completed by May 1, 2020. 4 | Page PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND PLANS Scope of Work: The City has a completed final concept “Yorkville Downtown Landscape Plan” designed and approved by the City Council. The approved plan is attached. The scope of work will focus only on the indicated area of the final concept plan which includes the following specifications provided on the bid sheet. Installation: The contractor shall install all items that are designated per the plan, depending on scope of the project. Requirements shall be as follows: A. The Contractor shall have the locations surveyed for underground utilities (JULIE) prior to starting work. B. All plant material will be locally grown and will be inspected by the City Representative prior to planting. C. Plant beds shall be prepared prior to planting according to specifications. D. Plant material will be planted per design and in accordance to “National Standards” with all containers, the top 1/3 burlap, twine and/or baskets being removed. A “water holding material” will be added to each hole prior to planting, as approved by the City. E. A minimum of 3” hardwood mulch will be added around each plant and/or plant bed. F. After planting, each plant will be watered accordingly. G. Boulder Outcropping, Retaining Wall & Signage will be installed according to plan. H. Any topsoil used shall be pulverized and free of any foreign material. Site Restoration: The Contractor will be responsible for the repairs or other damages that might be caused during the execution of this Contract. The Contractor shall insure that all disturbed areas be re-seeded with the same grass seed and blanket. Site cleanup shall take place at the completion of the project with all materials and debris generated during the job, be removed from the work areas. This includes any parking lots, sidewalks, rights-of-way and any other areas affected by the work. If site cleanup is to be delayed for any particular reason, barricades, cones and/or caution tape must be used until the site is clean as designated by the City’s Representative. Upon completion of the entire project, the sites outside the scope of the project should be returned to the same condition that existed prior to work being done. 5 | Page Maintenance: The Contractor will be responsible for plant material maintenance for a period of 60 days after final acceptance. Guarantees: All plant material and workmanship shall be guaranteed for one (1) year, at time of City’s acceptance of the completed project. Bid Schedule: Selection Process Steps Estimated Date(s) Committee Approval to Release City Council Approval to Release Release of Invitation to Bid (ITB) Optional Pre-Bid Meeting Final Date for Contractors to Submit Questions Addendum Posted Proposals Due Committee Approval City Council Approval Mandatory Pre-Season Meeting 6 | Page INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTORS - GENERAL CONDITIONS These Instructions to Contractors and General Conditions apply to all bids requested and accepted by the City and become a part of the contract unless otherwise specified. Contractors or their authorized representatives are expected to fully inform themselves as to the conditions, requirements, and specifications before submitting bids. The City assumes that submission of a bid means that the Contractor has familiarized himself with all conditions and intends to comply with them unless noted otherwise. 1. Forms – All bids must be submitted on the forms provided, complete with all blank spaces filled in and properly signed in ink in the proper spaces and submitted in a sealed envelope. All bid forms may be obtained from the United City of Yorkville located at 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL 60560. Please contact the Purchasing Manager to schedule a time to pick up the packet. When completed, deliver the packet to the United City of Yorkville, Attn. Carri Parker, Purchasing Manager, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL 60560, prior to the bid opening date and time. Bids must be identified as such on the outside of the sealed envelope by marking the envelope “SEALED BID” and with the following information: Company’s name, address, item bid, date and time of opening. Contractors may attach separate sheets for the purpose of explanation, exception, or alternative proposal and to cover required unit prices. 2. Submittal of Bid – Bids must be submitted to the attention of the Carri Parker, Purchasing Manager at the above address no later than Monday, September 23, 2019, at 11:30 a.m. local time. Bids arriving after the specified time will not be accepted. Mailed bids which are delivered after the specified hour will not be accepted regardless of postmarked time on the envelope. Contractors should carefully consider all bid delivery options and select a method that will successfully deliver their bid by the required time and date. 3. Examination of Bid Forms, Specifications, and Site – The contractor shall carefully examine the bid forms which may include the invitation to bid, instruction to contractors, general conditions, special conditions, plans, specifications, bid form, bond, contract, and any addenda to them before submitting the bid. The contractor shall verify all measurements relative to the work, shall be responsible for the correctness of same. Failure of the contractor to notify the City, in writing, of any condition(s) or measurement(s) making it impossible to carry out the work as shown and specified, will be construed as meaning no such conditions exist and no additional money will be added to the contract. The submission of the bid shall be considered conclusive evidence that the contractor has investigated and is satisfied as to all conditions to be encountered in performing the work, and is fully informed as to character, quality, quantities, and costs of work to be performed and materials to be furnished, and as to the requirements of the bid forms. If the bid is accepted, the contractor will be responsible for all errors in his proposal resulting from his failure or neglect to comply with these instructions, and the City shall not be responsible for any charge for extra work or change in anticipated profits resulting from such failure or neglect. 4. Scope of Work – The contractor shall supply all required supervision, skilled labor, transpiration, new materials, apparatus, and tools necessary for the entire and proper 7 | Page completion of the work. The contractor shall supply, maintain and remove all equipment for the performance of the work and be responsible for the safe, proper and lawful construction, maintenance and use of the same. This work shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City. The City is not responsible for site safety. The contractor is solely and exclusively responsible for construction means, methods, and technologies. 5. Interpretation of Bid Documents – Questions regarding bid documents, discrepancies, omissions, or intent of the specifications or plans shall be submitted in writing to the Purchasing Manager at cparker@yorkville.il.us, at least ten (10) working days prior to the opening of bids to provide time for issuing and forwarding an addendum. Any interpretations of the Contract Documents will be made only by addendum duly issued or delivered by the City to each person receiving a set of bid documents. The City will not be responsible for any other explanations for interpretations of the Contract Documents. Letters, requested interpretations, clarifications, and/or explanations shall be so noted on the outside of the envelope and on the first page of the letter with the words, INTERPRETATION REQUEST. Letters not properly marked will not be considered as a formal request. Any letter received within ten working days of the bid date will be returned unopened. 6. Bid Guarantee – Unless specifically waived, each bid shall be accompanied by a bid security in an amount of ten percent (10%) or such other percentage as stated in the supplementary conditions of the full amount of the bid in the form of a certified or bank cashier’s check or bid bond. In a reasonable time after the bid opening, bid deposits of all except the three lowest responsible bids will be released. The remaining deposits will be released after the successful contractor has entered into the contract and furnished the required insurance and bonds. The bid deposit shall become the property of the City if the successful contractor within fourteen (14) days from awarding the contract refuses or is unable to comply with the contract requirements, not as a penalty, but as liquidated damages. 7. Receiving Bids – Bids received prior to the time of opening will be securely kept, unopened. The Purchasing manager, whose duty it is to open them will decide when the specified time has arrived, and no bid received thereafter will be considered. No responsibility will be attached to the Purchasing Manager or the City for the premature or nonopening of a bid not properly addressed and identified, except as otherwise provided by law. 8. Late and Fax Bids – Bids arriving after the specified time, whether sent by mail, courier, or in person, will not be accepted and will be refused and returned unopened. It is the contractor’s responsibility for timely delivery regardless of the methods used. Mailed bids which are delivered after the specified hour will not be accepted regardless of postmarked time on the envelope. Facsimile machine transmitted bids will not be accepted, nor will the City transmit bid documents to prospective contractors by way of a facsimile machine. 9. Completeness – All information required by the Invitation to Bid must be supplied to constitute a responsive bid. The Contractor’s submittal shall include the completed Bid Proposal found in the contract documents. The City will strictly hold the contractor to the terms of the bid. The bid must be executed by a person having the legal right and authority to bind the contractor. 8 | Page 10. Error in Bids – When an error is made in extending total prices, the unit bid price and/or written words shall govern. Otherwise, the contractor is not relieved from errors in bid preparation. Erasures in bids must be explained over signature of contractor. 11. Withdrawal of Bids – A written request for the withdrawal of a bid or any part thereof may be granted if the request is received by the Purchasing Manager prior to the specified time of opening. After the opening, the contractor cannot withdraw or cancel his bid for a period of forty-five (45) calendar days, or such longer time as stated in the bid documents. 12. Contractor Interested in More than One Bid – Unless otherwise specified if more than one bid is offered by any one party, by or in the name of his or their agent, partner, or other persons, all such bids may be rejected. A party who has quoted prices on work, materials, or supplies to other contractors is not thereby disqualified from quoting prices to other contractors or from submitting a bid directly for the work, materials, or supplies. 13. Contractor’s qualifications – No award will be made to any contractor who cannot satisfy to the City that they have sufficient ability and experience in this class of work, as well as sufficient capital and equipment to do the job and complete the work successfully within the time named (i.e., responsible). The City’s decision or judgment on these matters shall be final and binding. The City may make such investigations as it deems necessary. The contractor shall furnish to the City all information and data the City may request for the purpose of investigation. 14. Bid Award for All or Part – Unless otherwise specified, bids shall be submitted for all of the work or items for which bids are requested. The City reserves the right to make award on all items, or any of the items, according to the best interests of the City. 15. Samples – Samples or drawings requested shall be delivered and removed at no cost to the City. The City shall not be responsible for damage to samples. Samples shall be removed by the contractor within thirty (30) days after notification. Samples must be submitted prior to the time set for the opening of bids. 16. Equipment or Materials – Each contractor shall submit catalogs, descriptive literature, and detailed drawings necessary to fully describe those features or the material or work not covered in the specifications. The parts and materials bids must be of current date (latest model) and meet specifications. This provision excludes surplus, remanufactured, and used products except as an alternate bid. The brand name and/or manufacturer of each item proposed must be clearly stated in the bid. Guarantee and/or warranty information must be included with this bid. 17. Toxic Substance – Prior to delivery of any material which is caustic, corrosive, flammable or dangerous to handle, the supplier shall provide written directions as to methods of handling such products, as well as the antidote or neutralizing material required for its first aid (Material Safety Data Sheet). 18. Delivery – Where applicable all materials shipped to the City must be shipped F.O.B. delivered, designated location, Yorkville, Illinois. If delivery is made by truck, arrangements must be made in advance by the bidder, with concurrence by the City, for receipt of the materials. The materials must be delivered where directed. Truck deliveries 9 | Page will be accepted at the Public Works Facility between 7:00 AM and 3:30 PM and at all other City locations 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM, weekdays only. 19. Estimated Bid Quantities – On “Estimated Quantities,” the City may purchase more or less than the estimates. The Contractor shall not be required to deliver more than ten (10) percent in excess of the estimated quantity of each item unless otherwise agreed upon. 20. Trade Names – Alternative Bid – When an item is identified in the specifications by a manufacturer’s or trade name or catalog number, the contractor shall bid upon the item so identified. If the specifications state “or equal” bids on other items will be considered, provided the contractor clearly identifies in his proposal the item to be furnished, together with any descriptive matter which will indicate the character of the item. Contractors desiring to bid on items which deviate from these specifications, but which they believe are equivalent, are requested to submit alternate bids. However, ALTERNATE BIDS MUST BE CLEARLY INDICATED AS SUCH AND DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPLICABLE SPECIFICATIONS PLAINLY NOTED. The bid must be accompanied by complete specifications for the items offered. Contractors wishing to submit a secondary bid must submit it as an alternate bid. The City shall be the sole and final judge unequivocally as to whether any substitute from the specifications is of equivalent or better quality. 21. Price – Unit prices shall be shown for each unit on which there is a bid as well as the aggregate price and shall include all packing, crating freight and shipping charges, and cost of unloading at the destination unless otherwise stated in the bid. Unit prices shall not include any local, state, or federal taxes. The City is exempt, by law, from paying State and City Retailer’s Occupation Tax, State Service Occupation and Use Tax and Federal Excise Tax. The City will supply the successful contractor with its tax exemption number. Cash discounts will not be considered in determining overall price but may be used in an overall evaluation. 22. Consideration of Bid – No bid will be accepted from or contract awarded to any person, firm or corporation that is in arrears or is in default to the City upon any debt or contract, or that is a defaulter, as surety or otherwise, upon any obligation to the City or had failed to perform faithfully any previous contract with the City. The contractor, if requested, shall present within 48 hours evidence satisfactory to the City of performance ability and possession of necessary facilities, pecuniary recourses, and adequate insurance to comply with the terms of these specifications and contract documents. 23. Award or Rejection – The City reserves the right to reject and/or award any and all bids or parts thereof and to waive formalities and technicalities according to the best interests of the City. Any bid submitted will be binding for forty-five (45) days subsequent to the 10 | Page date of the bid opening. A contract will be awarded to the lowest responsible bid complying with the conditions of the contract documents only when it is in the best interest of the City to accept the bid. The City shall be the sole judge of compliance with the specifications and reserves the right to accept or reject any and/or all bids or parts thereof. 24. Execution of Contract – The successful contractor shall, within fourteen (14) days after notification of the award: (a) enter into a contract in writing with the City covering all matters and things as are set forth in the specifications and his bid and (b) carry insurance acceptable to the City, covering public liability, property damage, and workmen’s compensation. After the acceptance and award of the bid and upon receipt of a written purchase order executed by the proper officials of the City, this Instruction to Contractors, including the specifications, will constitute part of the legal contract between the United City of Yorkville and the successful contractor. 25. Performance and Labor and Material Payment Bonds – Unless specifically waived or amended in the Special Conditions, the successful bidder shall furnish at the time of execution of the contract a performance bond for the full amount of the contract acceptable in form and surety to the City to guarantee the completion of any work to be performed by the contractor under the contract Unless specifically waived or amended in the Special Conditions, the successful bidder shall furnish at the time of execution of the contract a bond for the full amount of the contract acceptable in form and surety to the City conditioned upon the faithful performance and completion of the contract, payment of material used in such work, and for all labor performed in such work including by subcontractors. In the event that the bidder fails to furnish the bonds within 14 days after notification of the award, then the bid guarantee shall be retained by the City as liquidated damages and not as a penalty. It is agreed that the sum is a fair estimate of the amount of damages that the City will sustain due to the bidder's failure to furnish the bonds. 26. Compliance with All Laws – All work under the contract must be executed in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations which may in any manner affect the preparation of the bid or performance of the contract. 27. RESERVED 28. Compliance with the Substance Abuse Prevention on Public Works Projects Act – The Contractor and its Subcontractors shall comply with the Substance Abuse Prevention on Public Works projects Act (820 ILCS 265/1 et seq.) and prior to commencing work on a “public works” project (as defined in the Prevailing Wage Act) file with the City its program to comply with the Act or file that portion of its collective bargaining agreement that deals with the matters covered by the Act. 29. Equal Employment Opportunity – During the performance of the contract and/or supplying of materials, equipment, and suppliers, bidder must be in full compliance with 11 | Page all provisions of the Acts of the General Assembly of the State of Illinois relating to employment, including equal opportunity requirements. 30. Contract Alterations – No amendment of a contract shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the City Administrator or his/her authorized agent. 31. Notices – All notices required by the contract shall be given in writing. 32. Nonassignability – The Contractor shall not assign the contract, or any part thereof, to any other person, firm, or corporation without the previous written consent of the City Manager. Such assignment shall not relieve the Contractor from his obligations or change the terms of the contract. 33. Indemnity – To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Contractor hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, agents, and employees, against all injuries, deaths, loss, damages, claims, patent claims, suits, liabilities, judgments, cost, and expenses, which may in anywise accrue against the City, its officials, agents, and employees, arising in whole or in part or in consequence of the performance of this work by the Contractor, its employees, or subcontractors, or which may anywise result therefore, except that arising out of the sole legal cause of the City, its agents, or employees, the Contractor shall, at its own expense, appear, defend, and pay all charges of attorneys and all costs and other expenses arising therefore or incurred in connections therewith, and, if any judgment shall be rendered against the City, its officials, agents, and employees, in any such action, the Contractor shall, at its own expense, satisfy and discharge the same. Contractor expressly understands and agrees that any performance bond or insurance policies required by this contract, or otherwise provided by the Contractor, shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the City, its officials, agents, and employees as herein provided. 34. Insurance – In submission of a bid, the contractor is certifying that he has all insurance coverages required by law or would normally be expected for contractor’s type of business. In addition, the contractor is certifying that he has or will obtain at least the insurance coverages on the attached Insurance requirements. 35. Default – The City may terminate a contract by written notice of default to the Contractor if: 1. The Contractor fails to make delivery of the materials or perform the services within the time specified in the proposal, or 2. fails to make progress so as to endanger performance of the contract, or 3. fails to provide or maintain in full force and effect, the liability and indemnification coverages or performance bond as required. If the City terminates the contract, the City may procure supplies or services similar to those so terminated, and the Contractor shall be liable to the City for any excess costs for similar supplies and services, unless the Contractor provides acceptable evidence that failure to perform the contract was due to causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor. 12 | Page 36. Inspection – The City shall have a right to inspect, by its authorized representative, any material, components, or workmanship as herein specified. Materials, components, or workmanship that has been rejected by the authorized representative as not in accordance with the terms of the specifications shall be replaced by the Contractor at no cost to the City. 37. Supplementary Conditions – Wherever special conditions are written into the specifications or supplementary conditions which are in conflict with conditions stated in these Instructions to Contractor, the conditions stated in the specifications or supplementary conditions shall take precedence. 38. Permits and Licenses – The successful contractor and their subcontractor(s) shall obtain, at their own expense, all permits and licenses which may be required to complete the contract. Fees for all City permits and licenses shall be waived. 39. Contractor's Certification – - In compliance with the Illinois State Law that requires each contractor to file a certification regarding bid rigging and bid rotating and that it is not delinquent in its taxes, the contractor shall file with its bid the attached Bid Proposal Certification. 40. Change Orders – After the contract award, changes in or additions to the work and/or a change in the amount of money to be paid to the contractor must be the result of an approved change order first ordered by the Director of the lead department and approved by the City Administrator and/ or City Council. 41. Time of Completion – The successful contractor shall completely perform its bid in strict accordance with its terms and conditions within the number of consecutive calendar days after notification of award of the contract as stated in the bid proposal. 42. Payment – Payment will be made within thirty (30) days after acceptance of the job by the City after the completion of the work as covered within the contract documents. 43. Guarantees and Warranties – All guarantees and warranties required shall be furnished by the successful contractor and shall be delivered to the City before final payment on the contract is issued. 44. Waiver of Lien – where applicable a waiver of lien and contractor’s affidavit must be submitted by the successful contractor, verifying that all subcontractors and material invoices have been paid prior to the City approving final payment. 13 | Page SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Contractors Qualifications - If requested, the interested Contractor must provide a detailed statement regarding the business and technical organization of the Contractor that is available for the work that is contemplated. Information pertaining to financial resources, experiences of personnel, previously completed projects, plant facilities, and other data may also be required to satisfy the City that the Contractor is equipped and prepared to fulfill the Contract should the Contract be awarded to him. The competency and responsibility of Contractors and of their proposed subcontractors will be considered in making awards. If requested by the City, the Contractor shall include a complete list of all equipment and manpower available to perform the work intended on the Plans and Specifications. The list of equipment and manpower must prove to the City that the Contractor is well qualified and able to perform the work, and it shall be taken into consideration in awarding the Contract. The list shall be included with the sealed bid package. The City may make such investigations as it deems necessary, and the Contractor shall furnish to the City under oath, if so required, all such information and data for this purpose as the City may request. A responsible Contractor is one who meets all of the following requirements: • Have adequate financial resources or the ability to secure such resources. • Have the necessary experience, organization, and technical qualifications, and has or can acquire, the necessary equipment to perform the proposed Contract. • Is able to comply with the required performance schedule or completion date, taking into account all existing commitments. • Has a satisfactory record of performance, integrity, judgment, and skills. • Is qualified and eligible to receive an award under all applicable laws and regulations. 2. Basis of Payment - The Contractor shall submit with each payment request the Contractor’s Partial Waiver of Lien for the full amount of the requested payment. Beginning with the second payment request, and with each succeeding payment request, the Contractor shall submit partial waivers of lien for each subcontractor and supplier showing that the amount paid to date to each is at least equivalent to the total value of that subcontractor’s work, less retainage, included on the previous payment request. The Contractor’s request for final payment shall include the Contractor’s Final Waiver of Lien which shall be for the full amount of his Contract, including any change orders thereto, and Final Waivers of Lien from all subcontractors and suppliers for which Final Waivers of Lien have not previously been submitted. 3. Project Acceptance Procedures – All final pay item quantities shall be agreed upon between the City and the Contractor, and a final invoice shall be submitted by the Contractor, complete with all required waivers of lien and surety. Approval of the final pay estimate by the Director of Public Works shall constitute acceptance of the project by the United City of Yorkville, and written notice of such action shall be given to the Contractor. The date of approval of the final pay estimate shall be the Date of Acceptance and shall also be the date of the Start of Guarantee. 14 | Page Prior to the required Date(s) of Substantial Completion, a partial project acceptance may be granted in accordance with the foregoing procedure for entire project acceptance, with the exception that the pay estimate for the quantities of items included in the partial project acceptance shall not be the final pay estimate for the entire project. In the case of the City’s acceptance of any portion of the work as may be required because of the inclusion of a Date of Substantial Completion requirement, or for other reasons as may be agreed to by the United City of Yorkville, such partial acceptance action shall not constitute acceptance of any other portion of the project not noted in the written notice of partial acceptance which shall be provided to the Contractor by the Director of Public Works. 4. General Guarantee - Neither the final certificate of payment nor any provision in the Contractor Documents, shall constitute an acceptance of work not done in accordance with the Contract Documents or relieve the Contractor of liability in respect to any express warranties or responsibility for faulty materials or workmanship. The Contractor shall remedy any defects in the work and pay for any damage to other work resulting therefrom, which shall appear within a period of one (1) year from the date of final acceptance of the work unless a longer period is specified. The United City of Yorkville will give notice of observed defects with reasonable promptness. The Contractor shall guarantee all materials and workmanship as defined by the Performance Bond, and Maintenance Bond requirements. Unless otherwise amended in writing by the Purchasing Manager, the date of the Start of any Guarantees, Warranties and Maintenance Bonds shall be coincident with the Date of Acceptance of the entire project. 5. Maintenance Bond – The Maintenance Bond shall be in a penal sum of twenty percent (20%) of the final Contract amount for a period of one (1) year after the date of acceptance of the entire project. The Contractor may elect to reduce the Performance Bond, and the Labor and Material Bond to twenty percent (20%) of the final Contract amount in lieu of a separate Maintenance Bond. Such bond shall guarantee the work against defective workmanship and materials for a period of not less than one (1) year following acceptance of work. 6. Termination of Contract - The United City of Yorkville reserves the right to terminate the whole or any part of this Contract, upon written notice to the Contractor, in the event that sufficient funds to complete the Contract are not appropriated by the Board of Trustees of the United City of Yorkville. The United City of Yorkville further reserves the right to terminate the whole or any part of this Contract, upon written notice to the Contractor, in the event of default by the Contractor. Default is defined as failure of the Contractor to perform any of the provisions of this Contract, or failure to make sufficient progress so as to endanger performance of this Contract in accordance with its terms. In the event of default and termination, the United City of Yorkville may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as the United City of Yorkville may deem appropriate, supplies or services similar to those so terminated. The Contractor shall be liable for any excess costs for such similar supplies or service unless acceptable evidence is submitted to the United City of Yorkville that failure to perform the Contract was due to causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor. 15 | Page 7. Notification of Work - The Contractor shall notify the City’s Director of Public Works 48 hours prior to commencement of work and 24 hours prior to each inspection. 8. Cleaning - During construction, the Contractor and his subcontractors shall remove from the premises, rubbish, waste material, and accumulations, and shall keep the premises clean. The Contractor shall keep the premises clean during construction to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 9. Restoration - the calculation of quantities and limits of Restoration which will be allowed for payment will be in accordance with the “Standard Specifications.” Restoration, fill sand, stone, etc., required outside of the limits as indicated in the Contract Documents will be considered incidental to the Contract. The Contractor shall at all times maintain all equipment and materials within the limits of restoration as specified. 10. Removal and Replacement - all removal and replacement items will be marked and measured for payment prior to removal by the Contractor. Any removal beyond these lines will be replaced to the satisfaction of the Director Public Works with no additional compensation. 11. Business/Resident Notification - The Contractor shall not close any street or private driveway without the consent of the Director of Public Works, and the proper notification of the affected business/resident. 12. Use of Fire Hydrants - no fire hydrants shall be used to obtain water for non-emergency use. Water can be purchased and obtained at the City’s Director of Public Works Building. 16 | Page INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The Contractor shall provide satisfactory proof of commercial general liability, property damage, bodily injury, automobile liability, and workers compensation insurance, naming the United City of Yorkville, together with its officers, agents, employees and engineers as additional primary, non-contributory named insureds prior to commencing work. All policies shall be written on a "per occurrence" basis. The Contractor shall procure and maintain insurance for protection from claims under worker's compensation acts, claims for damages because of bodily injury including personal injury, sickness or disease or death of any and all employees or of any person other than such employees, and from claims or damages because of injury to or destruction of property including loss of use resulting therefrom, alleged to arise from the Contractor’s or its officers’, agent’s, employees’ negligence in the performance of services under this Agreement. Contractors certificate of insurance shall contain a provision that the coverage afforded under the policy(s) will not be canceled or reduced without thirty (30) days prior written notice (hand delivered or registered mail) to the City. Contractor shall promptly forward new certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the coverage(s) required herein upon annual renewal of the subject policies. Failure of the Contractor to supply a valid certificate of insurance, or if a previously valid certificate of insurance has expired and is not replaced, is grounds for issuance of a stop work order until such time as a valid certificate of insurance is provided. Failure of the City to collect or demand a certificate of insurance shall not be deemed a waiver of the requirement to provide one. The limits of liability for the insurance required by this Subsection shall not be less than the following: Workmen’s Compensation Insurance: All Liability imposed by Workmen’s Compensation statute Employer’s Liability Insurance $1,000,000 Contractual Liability Insurance $1,000,000 Completed Operations Insurance $ 500,000 Owned, Hired, and Non-Ownership Vehicle, Bodily Injury and Property Damage to the following Limits: Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 (each occurrence) Bodily Injury $2,000,000 (each person) $2,000,000 (each accident) Property Damage $2,000,000 (each accident) Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit (each accident) Umbrella Liability $3,000,000 (each occurrence) $3,000,000 (aggregate) 17 | Page BID PROPOSAL Note: The Contractor must complete all portions of this Bid Sheet The undersigned, having examined the specifications, and all conditions affecting the specified project, offer to furnish all services, labor, and incidentals specified for the price below. The undersigned Bidder certifies that they are not barred from bidding on this contract as a result of a conviction for the violation of state laws prohibiting bid rigging or bid rotating (720 ILCS 5/33E-1, et seq.) and is not delinquent in any taxes to the Illinois Department of Revenue (65 ILCS 5/11-42.2-1). It is understood that the City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any irregularities and that the prices contained herein will remain valid for a period of not less than forty-five (45) days. I (We) propose to complete the following project as more fully described in the specifications for the following: Bidding Company Name: ________________________________________________________ _____ Our firm has not altered any of the written texts within this document. Only those areas requiring input by the respondent have been changed or completed. If it is the Contractor’s intention to utilize a subcontractor(s) to fulfill the requirements of the Contract, the City must be advised of the subcontractor’s company name, address, telephone and fax numbers, and a contact person’s name at the time of bid submittal. YES NO Will you be utilizing a subcontractor? ____ ____ If yes, have you included all required Information with your bid submittal? ____ ____ OR NO BID – Keep our company on your Contractors List ______________________________ Signature ______________________________ Date NO BID – Remove our company from Your Contractors List ______________________________ Signature ______________________________ Date BID PROPOSAL CONTINUED Plant List Description Size (height) Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Acer Platanoides “Royal Red” Norway Maple 6 foot 5 $ $ Juniperus Chinensis “Sea Green” Sea Green Juniper 24-48 inches 15 $ $ Labor Cost $ Total Plant List Cost $ Hardscape Description Size Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost Limestone Veneer Retaining Wall 3.5’ exposed 35 foot 1 $ $ Individual Channel Steel Letters “YORKVILLE” 24 inches 9 $ $ Limestone Boulder Outcroppings 12-18 inches 15 $ $ Solar Lighting (up lighting or back channel letter lighting) TBD TBD $ $ Labor Cost $ Total Hardscape Cost $ Total Project Cost $ Contractor’s Firm Name Date Signed Name Print Name Title 19 | Page BID PROPOSAL CONTINUED The undersigned contractor; A. Certifies that it is not barred from bidding or contracting with the City as a result of a violation of either Paragraph 33E-3 (Bid rigging) or 33E-4 (Bid rotating) of Act 5, Chapter 720 of the Illinois Complied Statutes regarding criminal interference with public contracting, and B. Swears under oath that it is not delinquent in the payment of any tax administered by the Illinois Department of Revenue as required by Chapter 65, Act 5, paragraph 11-42.1 of the Illinois Complied Statutes, and C. States that is has a written sexual harassment policy as required by the Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/2-105(A) (4) a copy of which shall be provided to the City upon request, and D. Agrees to comply with the requirements of the Illinois Human Rights Act regarding Equal Employment Opportunities as required by Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/2-105) and agrees to comply with the EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY CLAUSE in Appendix A, Section 750, Part 750, Chapter X, Subtitle B of Title 44 of the Illinois Administrative Code incorporated herein by reference, and D. Agrees to comply with the civil rights standards set forth in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as mandated in Executive Order No. 11246, U.S.C.A. Section 2000e n.114 (September 24, 1965), and E. Agrees to comply with the Substance Abuse Prevention on Public Works Projects Act (820 ILCS 265/1 et seq.) if this Project is a “public work” within the meaning of the Illinois Prevailing Wage Act (820 ILCS 130/.01 et seq.) and prohibit substance abuse while performing such work and has a substance abuse prevention program, and F. Agrees to provide a drug free workplace pursuant to the Drug Free Workplace Act (30 ILCS 580/1 et seq.) (25 or more employees under a contract of more than $5,000 or for individuals only when greater than $5,000), and G. Agrees to comply with the Employment of Illinois Workers on Public Works Act (30 ILCS 570/0.01 et seq.) and employ Illinois laborers if at the time of this contract is executed or if during the term of this contract there is excessive unemployment in Illinois as defined in the Act. Contractor’s Firm Name Date Signed Name Print Name Title Street Address City State Zip Phone Number Fax Number Email Address 20 | Page DETAIL EXCEPTION SHEET Any exception must be clearly noted on this sheet. Failure to do so may be reason for rejection of the bid. It is not our intention to prohibit any potential contractor from bidding by virtue of the specifications, but to describe the material(s) and service(s) actually required. The City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all exceptions. Contractor’s exceptions are: _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ 21 | Page EQUIPMENT LIST Name Make Model Year Use If additional sheets are needed, please make copies. 22 | Page SUBCONTRACTOR LISTING Provide the name, contact information, and value of work for each and every subcontractor which will be employed on this project. Subcontractor No. 1 Business Name Address City, State, Zip Code Telephone Number Value of Work Subcontracted Nature of Work Subcontracted Subcontractor No. 2 Business Name Address City, State, Zip Code Telephone Number Value of Work Subcontracted Nature of Work Subcontracted 23 | Page Subcontractor No. 3 Business Name Address City, State, Zip Code Telephone Number Value of Work Subcontracted Nature of Work Subcontracted If additional sheets are needed, please make copies. 24 | Page REFERENCES General Information, the list below current business references for whom you have performed work similar to that required by this proposal. Reference No. 1 Business Name Address City, State, Zip Code Contact Person Telephone Number Dates of Service Reference No. 2 Business Name Address CIty, State, Zip Code Contact Person Telephone Number Dates of Service 25 | Page Reference No. 3 Business Name Address City, State, Zip Code Contact Person Telephone Number Dates of Service If additional sheets are needed, please make copies. 26 | Page UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT made this _____ day of ______________, 2019, by and between the United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation hereinafter called the “Owner” and _________________________________________ located at _________________________ hereinafter called the “Contractor”. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Owner has heretofore solicited Bid Proposals for all labor and materials necessary to complete the work specified in the Invitation To Bid – Design and Installation of the 2019 Downtown Hill Landscape Project; WHEREAS, the Owner has found that the Contractor is the lowest responsible bidder for said work and has awarded the Contractor this contract for said work. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of their mutual promises and agreements, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 1. The Contractor agrees to furnish all materials, supplies, tools, equipment, labor and other services necessary to commence and complete the work proposed in accordance with the conditions and prices stated in the Invitation to Bid, Instructions to Contractors – General Conditions, Special Conditions, Insurance Requirements, Specifications and Plans, Bid Proposal, and Detail Exception Sheet all of which are made a part hereof and herein called the “Contract Documents”. 2. The Owner will pay the Contractor in the amounts, manner and at times as set forth in the Contract Documents. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed, or caused to be executed by their duly authorized officials, this Contract as of the day and year first above written: OWNER: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE By: _________________________________ Mayor Attest: CONTRACTOR: ___________________________ City Clerk By: __________________________________ Signature Attest: __________________________________ Print Name and Title ________________________________ Witness Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #9 Tracking Number EDC 2019-67 Kane/Kendall Council of Mayors Bike Sharing Services – Memorandum of Understanding Economic Development Committee – August 6, 2019 Majority Approval Please see attached. Erin Willrett Administration Name Department Summary Partner with Kane County DOT as part of Kane/Kendall Council of Mayors to research the viability and cost of a bike-share system for the City of Yorkville. Background The Kane County Division of Transportation (KDOT) has begun to work with its municipalities, non-profits, park districts, forest preserves, and private companies to develop a countywide bike sharing system. The anticipated launch of the system is August 2020. The next step in the process is to collect signed Memorandum of Understanding’s (MOU) from interested parties that wish to participate in the program. These MOU’s are not legally or financially binding whatsoever, but simply state that the City is potentially interested in participating. The main purpose in signing these MOU’s is that only participants that sign the MOU before the deadline will be able to view and provide comments on the Request for Proposal (RFP) for a bike sharing company that KDOT will be releasing in September 2019. Signing of the MOU does not require the City to take part in the program. A bicycle-sharing system, public bicycle system, or bike-share scheme, is a service in which bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a short term basis for a price or free. Many bike share systems allow people to borrow a bike from a "dock" and return it at another dock belonging to the same system. Docks are special bike racks that lock the bike, and only release it by computer control. The user enters payment information, and the computer unlocks a bike. The user returns the bike by placing it in the dock, which locks it in place. Other systems are dockless. For many systems, smartphone mapping apps show nearby available bikes and open docks. The benefits of bike sharing schemes include transport flexibility, reductions to vehicle emissions, health benefits, reduced congestion and fuel consumption, and financial savings for individuals. Research has shown that bike sharing has a positive impact on commercial activity, as well. Users reported that they engaged in new spending at these neighborhood businesses because of the access provided by bike sharing. In short, for both businesses and consumers, bike share systems have a positive effect on business activity due to increased accessibility within local neighborhoods. With help and investment from local municipalities, non-profits, organizations, and recreational districts, Kane County is hoping to create a system with at least 12 stations for the initial planned launch in August 2020. These stations will be placed at recreational, residential, commercial destinations, as well as strategic public transportation stops. However, each participant has the flexibility to place the station wherever they see fit within their community and/or property. The County will provide support to all participants to ensure that stations are not being placed in close proximity to another station, which would decrease ridership for both stations. Each station owner is responsible for the capital and annual financial obligations of owning and operating a bike share station. Each station will cost an estimated $10,000 per year to own and operate, with an estimated $3,000 installation fee. However, these costs will fluctuate depending on the number of stations included within the system. A higher number of stations will decrease the price for all participants. One of the main sources of revenue for a bike share station owner is selling advertising/sponsorship space on the bikes and station. Station owners have full autonomy on the Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: August 6, 2019 Subject: Bike Sharing Memorandum of Understanding sponsors that they procure for their stations. Owners also have the right to set sponsorship prices independent of other stations. Recommendation Staff is seeking approval for the Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Bike Sharing Services. This would allow staff to provide comments on the future Request for Proposal for a bike sharing company. The RFP would be released in September 2019. This does not require the City to take part in the bike sharing program. Kane County Bike Share System Development Program Overview The Kane County Division of Transportation (KDOT) is very excited to announce its intention to work with its municipalities, park districts, forest preserve(s), non-profits, and private institutions to create a countywide bike sharing system! A bicycle-sharing system, public bicycle system, or bike-share scheme, is a service in which bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a short term basis for a price or free. Many bike share systems allow people to borrow a bike from a "dock" and return it at another dock belonging to the same system. Docks are special bike racks that lock the bike, and only release it by computer control. The user enters payment information, and the computer unlocks a bike. The user returns the bike by placing it in the dock, which locks it in place. Other systems are dockless. For many systems, smartphone mapping apps show nearby available bikes and open docks. The benefits of bike sharing schemes include transport flexibility, reductions to vehicle emissions, health benefits, reduced congestion and fuel consumption, and financial savings for individuals. Research has shown that bike sharing has a positive impact on commercial activity, as well. Users reported that they engaged in new spending at these neighborhood businesses because of the access provided by bike sharing. In short, for both businesses and consumers, bike share systems have a positive effect on business activity due to increased accessibility within local neighborhoods. Bike sharing will be an affordable, healthy, safe, environmentally sustainable, and popular addition to Kane County’s transportation options. Implementing a top-quality system will boost the County’s transportation network and further advance Kane County’s position as a high quality destination and place to live. Bike share will help connect residents, commuters and visitors to more of Kane County’s businesses, institutions and attractions. Future requests from neighboring counties or municipalities for participation in the Kane County System offer the possibility for expansion beyond the initial service area. If you have any questions regarding the program please contact Ryan Peterson at 630-444-3143 or petersonryan@co.kane.il.us. System Implementation With help and investment from local municipalities, non-profits, organizations, and recreational districts, Kane County is hoping to create a system with at least 12 stations for the initial planned launch in August 2020. We hope that these stations will be placed at recreational, residential, commercial destinations, as well as strategic public transportation stops throughout the County. However, each participant has the flexibility to place the station wherever they see fit within their community and/or property. The County will provide support to all participants to ensure that stations are not being placed in close proximity to another station, which would decrease ridership for both stations. Each station owner is responsible for the capital and annual financial obligations of owning and operating a bike share station. Each station will cost an estimated $10,000 per year to own and operate, with an estimated $3,000 installation fee. However, these costs will fluctuate depending on the number of stations included within the system. A higher number of stations will decrease the price for all participants. The County will also help to subsidize the cost of these stations. There are three main types of bike share systems: docked, dockless, and hybrid. Each system type has their own benefits and drawbacks, making them ideal for different settings and locales. The Kane County system will focus on only docked stations at the initial launch in 2020. This type was chosen because docked systems have the least administrative strain; lowest potential for vandalism and theft; highest potential for advertising; and are easily implemented into suburban locations. Other systems can be incorporated into the County system at a later date, however. Pictured below is a typical configuration of a docked bike share station and the features that come standard on most bike share bicycles. Timeline In order to create the system by August 2020, there needs to be lots of coordination and communication between the participating station owners, sponsors, and the bike share organizers. The draft timeline listed below outlines the dates for a successful, timely launch. These dates are subject to change. 2019 May KKCOM Bike & Pedestrian Committee meeting; presentations by bike sharing companies May 31 & June 6 Conference call(s) involving interested stakeholders (municipalities, forest preserves, park districts, etc.) August 23 Deadline to sign non-binding MOU to participate in opening round of funding September Release RFP to select bike share provider October Select preferred provider; start drafting network design November Start holding public input meetings to educate public on bike sharing and determine ideal station locations 2020 January Finalize financial obligations for participants February Finalize network locations March Secure advertising, sponsors for system June Start marketing and outreach efforts July Financial obligations due to bike share provider August Construction and implementation of stations Sponsorship Opportunities One of the main sources of revenue for a bike share station owner is selling advertising/sponsorship space on the bikes and station. Station owners have full autonomy on the sponsors that they procure for their stations. Owners also have the right to set sponsorship prices independent of other stations. Pictured below are diagrams that display some of the space available to station owners for sponsorships. Throughout the county, there have been a variety of different sponsorship formats that bike share systems and the station owners have created in order to generate revenue. The five main types of sponsorship opportunities that are recommended are listed below: 1. Title Sponsor  System naming rights  Brand inclusion on bikes/stations  Brand inclusion on system website, social media, and location-based promotions  In-app advertising 2. Presenting Sponsor  If no title sponsor is found, 3-4 presenting sponsors will take place  Many of the same advertising components but without system naming rights 3. Station Sponsor  Brand inclusion on station kiosk 4. Station Host  Donate property to host station at residential, recreational or commercial location 5. Digital Advertising  In-app advertising  Social media Applicable Case Studies o St. Lucie County, Florida  Population: 313,506  Density: 486 residents per sq. mile  Created a nine station, 50 bike system aimed at increasing connectivity throughout the county  Spaced stations one to four miles apart to cover a larger area but not restrict connectivity and access between stations  Used Zagster as their bike share provider  County retains 93% of the operation’s bike share rental fees o Howard County, Maryland o Population: 287,085 o Density: 1,279 residents per sq. mile o Nine stations and 78 bike system throughout two of its largest cities o Had over 4,800 rides in its first year of operation o Used Bewegen Technologies as their contractor  Anne Arundel County, Maryland o Population: 573,235 o Density: 1,381 residents per sq. mile o Dockless bike share program focusing primarily around attractions and locations in Annapolis o Attracted 700+ members in the first three months o Used Pace as their bike share provider     Memorandum of Understanding   Regarding Bike Sharing Services    This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is made by and between the Kane County  Division of Transportation (the “County”) and ____________ (the “Local Public Agency”).    TERMS OF UNDERSTANDING  1. Definitions.  a. “Bicycles” means all standard pedal bicycles and/or other mobility vehicles that  might be included within the program.  b. “Kane County Bike Share Program” means the future bike share program being  organized by the Kane County Division of Transportation.    PROGRAM OUTLINE  The Local Public Agency has expressed interest in participating in the Kane County Bike Share  Program. This memorandum of understanding is meant to serve as an outline of key elements  and dates of the Kane County Bike Share Program as it would relate to the Local Public Agency’s  participation therein.    1. Purpose of the Program. Bike sharing will be an affordable, healthy, safe,  environmentally sustainable, and popular addition to Kane County’s transportation  options. Implementing a top‐quality system will boost the County’s transportation  network and further advance Kane County’s position as a high quality destination and  place to live. Bike share will help connect residents, commuters and visitors to more of  Kane County’s businesses, institutions and attractions. Requests from neighboring  counties and municipalities therein for participation in the Kane County System offer the  possibility for expansion beyond the initial service area.  2. Goals and Objectives. The following goals and objectives have been identified for the  initial launch of the system:   Create a quality user experience with a convenient and easy‐to‐use system,   Enhance connections to the public transit network and park‐and‐ride lots,   Increase physical activity to benefit public health,   Promote travel to landmarks, parks, trails and shopping districts (among  residents and visitors),   Increase access to job opportunities and education,   Expand mobility options for low‐income residents,   Improve connectivity between existing hubs of activity, and   Leverage bike share to help shift local culture towards multi‐modal  transportation  3. The Local Public Agency’s Responsibilities. Following the Request for Proposal process,  the Local Public Agency will be responsible for all financial obligations for the stations  that they purchase from the chosen contractor. The County will not own or operate any  stations. The Local Public Agency will be responsible for negotiating the revenue sharing      breakdown, station location placement, and other financial matters with the chosen  contractor.     OBLIGATIONS  This MOU does not create any financial or legal obligations, nor does it signal any commitment  of funds from either Party.     In order to move forward, The Parties will sign this Memorandum of Understanding that will be  executed no later than Friday, August 23, 2019.    This MOU shall automatically terminate if the Memorandum of Understanding is not entered  into, for any reason, on or before August 23, 2019.    In order to be eligible to offer comments on the forthcoming Request for Proposals that will be  used to procure a bike sharing contractor, this MOU must be signed before August 23, 2019.  Those who do not wish to sign the MOU before the aforementioned deadline will not be  eligible to offer comments to the RFP.    We look forward to working with the municipalities, agencies, and organizations of Kane  County to improve mobility for its residents and visitors. It is the hope of Kane County Division  of Transportation that this program will help create more liveable cities, enhanced recreational  offerings, additional transportation options and a reduced carbon footprint.    [Remainder of page intentionally blank. Signatures follow on subsequent page.]         The Local Public Agency Kane County By: By: Name: Name: Title: Title: Date: Date: Attest: Clerk of the Board Approved as to form and legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney     Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #10 Tracking Number EDC 2019-68 Unified Development Ordinance – Change Order Request Economic Development Committee – August 6, 2019 2/26/2019 Approval of RFP Award EDC 2019-16 Majority Approval Approval of a fee change order regarding the Unified Development Ordinance. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Summary: The purpose of this memo is to request a change order to the approved Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) project for a budget increase of $7,125. The overall total project cost would increase from $148,360 to $155,485. By definition, a Change Order, is a written order to the Contractor authorizing an addition, deletion or revision in the work within the general scope of the contract documents or authorizing an increase or decrease in the contract price or contract time. In paragraph E of the attached executed contract with Houseal Lavigne, the contract consultant for the UDO project, any such changes to the contract, including increases or decreases in amount of compensation, which are mutually agreed upon, requires a written amendment to the agreement. Background: In December 2018, the City solicited request for proposals (RFP) from qualified consulting firms for a Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) which would to modernize and consolidate the various existing City ordinances into a cohesive, single-reference, graphic-based document. As part of the scope of services in the UDO RFP, the City specifically requested “an online digital smart code with interactive site specific zoning analysis capable of rendering calculations for zoning criteria such as minimum parking requirements for proposed land use, maximum lot coverage, required setbacks and transition yards, and volumetric limits (FAR, height, etc.) based upon ESRI ARC GIS base layer data provided by the City. After submittals from two (2) firms in response to the RFP, the City Council approved a contract with Houseal Lavigne in February 2019 for the commencement of a Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). The agreement for the contract was valued at $148,360 which included a suite of features from enCode Plus, a web-based document presentation and management system developed by planners and code writers, as part of the Advanced 180 package ($5,250 billed annually) with an embedded calculator for a one-time fee of $2,500 (see below). It was staff’s understanding at the time of the contract and interview with Houseal Lavigne that the total cost included all zoning calculators enumerated in the scope of services requested as part of the deliverables in the RFP. No other information detailing enCode Plus fees were provided in the proposal. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. CC: Jason Engberg, Senior Planner Date: April 22, 2019 Subject: Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Change Order request regarding fees for enCode Plus enCode Plus Fees: As the subconsultant, enCode Plus, who was not present at the interview with Houseal Lavigne, would be designing the platform for the dynamic online smart-code. During the kick-off meeting with Houseal Lavigne, after the award of the contract, staff was provided the attached service agreement from enCode Plus. It was then relayed to staff by enCode Plus, that although the Advanced 180 package comes with a suite of up to seven (7) features/calculators, there would be a one-time set-up fee of $2,500 per calculator or $17,500. The calculators offered are as follows: 1. Parking Calculator1 – calculates the minimum required number of off-street parking spaces based on use by zoning district. 2. Shared Use Parking Calculator - calculates the minimum required number of off-street parking spaces when two or more land uses share the same parking area. 3. Landscape Calculator2 - calculates the minimum required landscaping material by zoning district, based upon lot size and adjacent land uses. 4. Bufferyard Calculator3 - calculates the minimum required landscaped bufferyard area and vegetation type by zoning district, based upon lot size and adjacent land uses. 5. Signage Calculator4- calculates the minimum required number, area, setback, distance separation and maximum height for signage based on zoning district and sign type. 6. Project Fee Calculator – calculates the fees for land use applications based upon request type (annexation, rezoning, special use, etc.) and land area. 7. Yield Calculator5 – calculates the maximum total buildable dwelling units and/or maximum total buildable non-residential square feet by zoning district. Additionally, the built-in calculators will also have the ability for the user to export the data or to save the data entered into the calculator. Real world examples of communities currently utilizing the enCode Plus calculators as part of their online codes are provided as links in the footnotes at the bottom on this page. Request: To acquire all the above-mentioned calculator features, which are available in the Advance 180 package, the City will need to authorize a change order since the one-time set up fee for the calculators requested was not clearly articulated to us by Houseal Lavigne during the RFP review process. As originally proposed, Houseal Lavigne listed the pricing for only one (1) calculator at a cost of $2,500.00. However, in order to purchase the additional six (6) calculators offered in the Advance 180 package, there is a one-time set-up fee of $2,500 per calculator or $15,000 of which $2,625 (15%) is discounted for a total of $12,375. Since discovering the miscommunication about the start-up fee for the calculators, Bret Keast of EnCode Plus has subsequently agreed to remove the initial licensing fee of $1,875 included in Houseal Lavigne’s proposal. Additionally, Houseal Lavigne has agreed to amend their hours for the UDO preparation by consolidating two (2) meetings (Step #6b and #6c), thereby lessening their billable hours by $3,375. 1 http://online.encodeplus.com/regs/greensboro-nc/calculators.aspx http://online.encodeplus.com/regs/johnston-ia/calculators.aspx 2 http://online.encodeplus.com/regs/greensboro-nc/calculators.aspx http://online.encodeplus.com/regs/johnston-ia/calculators.aspx 3 http://online.encodeplus.com/regs/stmary-la/webtools/landscape/bufferrequirements.aspx 4 http://online.encodeplus.com/regs/greensboro-nc/calculators.aspx http://online.encodeplus.com/regs/johnston-ia/calculators.aspx 5http://online.encodeplus.com/regs/valparaiso-in/doc-viewer.aspx#secid-490 Therefore, the requested change order amount would be for $7,125. This represents the difference between the total HL & enCode plus fee ($155,485) and the approved project budget ($148,360). The following chart has been prepared to clearly explain and layout the fee difference proposed as part of this change order request.   Approved UDO Project Budget Houseal Lavigne (HL) RFP Proposed enCode Plus Additional Calculator Fees & Discounts Houseal Lavigne RFP $138,735 One-Time Build Fee for additional six (6) calculators $15,000 enCode Plus Initial Licensing Fee $1,875 15% Discount Fee -$2,625 enCode Plus Advance 180 (1st year) $5,250 Discount of enCode Plus Initial Licensing Fee* -$1,875 enCode Plus one (1) embedded calculator $2,500 Discount of Houseal Lavigne Billable Hours -$3,375 TOTAL $148,360.00 TOTAL $7,125.00 TOTAL proposed new UDO Project Budget $155,485 Staff Comments: Staff supports the change order request for a budget increase of $7,125 and strongly believes, to realize the full potential of the interactive, site specific zoning analysis capabilities offered by enCode Plus in the smart-code, purchasing the suite of embedded calculators is required. The added calculator features will provide clarity to the code’s regulations for any end user (resident and developer) regarding bulk standards (setbacks, buffers, maximum height, etc.), as well as reduce staff review time of submitted permits and proposals. Although staff had requested the capabilities of all these calculators as part of our initial RFP request, the quote provided of $2,500 was not clearly stated in the HL proposal, nor fully understood by the consultant themselves, that this price was for a single calculator. Based upon that, enCode Plus has discounted the initial licensing fee of $1,875.00 from the original quote and the consultant has adjusted their billable hours to reduce the contracted fee by $3,375. Attached is the revised License Agreement from enCode Plus for the purchase of additional embedded calculators within the “smart code” and the amended scope of work with Houseal Lavigne indicating the meeting schedule adjustment. The City Attorney has also reviewed both of the revised agreements. Staff will be available to Tuesday night’s meeting to discuss this matter in greater detail. Resolution No. 2019- A RESOLUTION OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HOUSEAL LAVIGNE ASSOCIATES,LLC. WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS,the City sought proposals for technical and professional services for the creation of a unified development ordinance for the City; and, WHEREAS, after a thorough review of the proposals received, the City Council has determined that the proposal presented by Houseal Lavigne Associates, LLC. is in the best interest of the City and hereby approves an agreement for such services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1: That the AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS AND HO USEAL LA VIGNE ASSOCIATES, LLC. between the City and Houseal Lavigne Associates, LLC. attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof by reference, is hereby approved, and the City Administrator be and is hereby authorized to execute said Agreement on behalf of the United City of Yorkville. Section 2: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and approval as provided by law. Passed by the City Coun it of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, nois this 26 day of 2019. CITY CLERK CARLO COLOSIMO KEN KOCH 11Y JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ARDEN JOE PLOCHER CHRIS FUNKHOUSER JOEL FRIEDERS SEAVER TARULIS JASON PETERSON Resolution No.2019-0(0 Page 1 Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of MflRCff 2019. 9 V MA OR Resolution No.2019-Go— Page 2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT MARC H S , 2019 BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS AND HOUSEAL LAVIGNE ASSOCIATES, LLC. Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville UDO 1 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS AND HOUSEAL LAVIGNE ASSOCIATES, LLC. THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 9 day of 1` "C ff , 2019, by and between HOUSEAL LAVIGNE ASSOCIATES LLC., an Illinois Limited Liability Company with principal offices at 188 W. Randolph, Suite 200, Chicago, IL 60601 (hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT"), and the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS, a municipal corporation of the State of ILLINOIS,whose mailing address is 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560 hereinafter referred to as the"CLIENT"). WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, the CLIENT desires to engage the services of the CONSULTANT to furnish technical and professional assistance in connection with the preparation of the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (hereinafter referred to as the"PROJECT") and the CON- SULTANT has signified its willingness to furnish technical and professional service to the CLIENT; and WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents to the CLIENT that it has sufficient expertise and resources to enable it to provide such advice and assistance to the CLIENT; and NOW,THEREFORE, the parties do mutually agree as follows: Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 2 A. Scope of Consultant's Services The CONSULTANT agrees to perform in a good and professional manner those services described in Attachment A, Scope of Services, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated in this AGREEMENT. All documents, work papers, maps, and study materials produced by the CONSULTANT in the performance of these services become the property of the CLIENT during and upon completion of the services to be performed under this AGREEMENT. B. Services to be Provided by the Client All existing information, data, reports and records which are useful for carrying out the work on this PROJECT and which are owned or controlled by the CLIENT shall be furnished to the CONSULTANT in a timely manner. The completion of the services to be performed by the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT is contingent upon the receipt from the CLIENT, at no cost to the CONSULTANT, the data and reports and other material as described in Attachment A, Section 1, in a timely manner. If, by reason of any fault of CLIENT, the information, data, reports and records to be provided by the CLIENT are not made available to the CONSULTANT in a timely manner, the CONSULTANT may, at its option, stop work on the PROJECT until such materials are provided. C. Meetings and Consultant Visits The CONSULTANT will attend meetings associated with the following tasks, and any additional meetings deemed reasonable and needed to complete the PROJECT, as outlined in Attachment A, Scope of Services. 1a: Project Initiation—Staff Meeting & Review of Preliminarily Issues 1 b: Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop 1c: Residential Areas Zoning Workshop 1d: Commercial and Industrial Areas Zoning Workshop Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 3 1e: Subdivision Ordinance Focus Group 2d: City Staff Working Session 2e: PZC Meeting 3e: Staff Review Meeting 3f: PZC Meeting 4b: Staff Review Meeting 5c: Staff Review Meeting 5d: PZC Meeting 6b: Staff Review and Meeting 6c: PZC Meeting 7b: Staff Review Meeting 7c: PZC Meeting 7e: Public Hearing 7f: City Council Presentation and Adoption A meeting within the body of this AGREEMENT shall mean a gathering requiring the atten- dance of the CONSULTANT or CONSULTANT's staff, including workshops, formal presentations and meetings. Public meetings shall be scheduled at least seven (7)to fifteen 15) days in advance, and public hearings shall be scheduled with sufficient advance notice to comply with state and local notice requirements. Attendance at additional meetings will be subject to the provisions of Article M (Extra Work) of this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT may conduct "site visits" to gather information, data, and perform field reconnaissance. These "site visits" shall not be counted as meetings under this AGREEMENT. D. Deliverables CONSULTANT agrees to provide products to the CLIENT as follows: 1: Workshop Summaries 1: Project Website and online outreach platform (map.social) (optional) 2: Summary and presentation of outreach, research, and assessment 3: Draft Residential and Agricultural District Standards 3: Draft Commercial and Industrial District Standards 3: Draft Special District Standards (OS, PUD, Downtown Overlay) 3. Proposed Zoning Districts Map 4: Prelim Amendments for Parking, Landscaping, Development Standards, etc 5: Draft Modified Subdivision Design/Improvement Regulations 6: Draft Administrative, Applications, Approval, and Procedures 7: Draft UDO Ordinance Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 4 7: Revised UDO & Final Legal Review 7: City Council Presentation and Adoption 8: enCode Plus ready Yorkville UDO Document The CONSULTANT shall provide all deliverables at least five (5) days in advance of all public meetings. All deliverables become the property of the CLIENT, including all hard copies and electronic file copies. E. Changes The CLIENT may, from time to time, request changes in Attachment A, Scope of Services, of the services to be performed by the CONSULTANT hereunder. Such changes, including any appropriate increase or decrease in the amount of compensation, which are mutually agreed upon, shall be incorporated in written amendments to this AGREEMENT. F. Consultant's Compensation The CONSULTANT shall be compensated for services rendered under the terms of this AGREEMENT on the basis of the CONSULTANT's hourly rates as stated under Article G Hourly Rates) and Attachment A for the staff time devoted to the PROJECT, and for directly related project expenses. The maximum cost for CONSULTANT services under this AGREEMENT is $140,610, including directly related job expenses. Directly related job expenses include, but are not limited to: travel, printing, graphic reproduction, mailing, the purchase of additional maps, plans and reports and other out-of-pocket expenses that are related to carrying out services under this AGREEMENT. Any reimbursable expenses that are not enumerated above must be identified by the CONSULTANT and approved by the CLIENT. The CONSULTANT will not exceed the "not to exceed amount' without specific written authorization from the CLIENT or an amendment to this AGREEMENT. The Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 5 CONSULTANT represents and warrants that absent Extra Work, as referenced in Article M, all work to be performed under this AGREEMENT can and will be performed without exceeding the maximum compensation amount and directly related job expense amount, both set forth above. G. Hourly Rates The CONSULTANT reserves the right to increase the hourly charge rates, but only after one calendar year from the date of this AGREEMENT, provided however that the maximum CONSULTANT costs as provided in Section F shall not be exceeded. The CLIENT shall be notified at least 30 days in advance and increase must be agreed to in writing by both parties. Hourly rates in effect for purposes of this AGREEMENT are provided in Attachment A. H. Method of Payment The CONSULTANT will submit invoices for services performed and directly related job expenses incurred on the PROJECT during the billing period. The CONSULTANT will submit monthly invoices for services performed and directly related job expenses incurred on the PROJECT during the billing period. Invoices are due and payable no later than thirty 30) days from the date of CLIENT's receipt of the invoice and in accordance with the governmental prompt payment act. I. Time of Performance The services of the CONSULTANT will begin upon delivery to the CONSULTANT of an executed copy of this AGREEMENT, and shall, absent causes beyond the reasonable control of the CONSULTANT, be completed within twenty-four (24) months of delivery of Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I 6 UDO said executed AGREEMENT. The completion of services by the CONSULTANT shall be, among other things, contingent upon the timely receipt of the services, data, and other reports described in Attachment A, Scope of Services and upon the timely conduct by the CLIENT of meetings and decisions required for its purposes in the execution of Attachment A. For the purpose of this AGREEMENT, timely shall mean that decisions and choices be made within ten (10) working days for CLIENT staff review of CONSULTANT submittals, services, data, and reports as are delivered to the CLIENT's representative; and twenty- one (21) calendar days for such decisions and choices to be made by the City Council, or other elected or appointed bodies of the CLIENT. If the CLIENT requests that CONSULT- ANT perform Extra Work as defined in Article M such as is not now included in Attachment A, the CONSULTANT, if agreed to by the CLIENT, may suspend work on the PROJECT or a portion of the PROJECT, and may extend the period of time allotted to perform the services identified in Attachment A under this AGREEMENT, to a mutually agreed upon period of time necessary to compensate for Extra Work. Where the CLIENT and CONSULTANT mutually agree to extend the period of time to perform services under this AGREEMENT, the hourly rates may not be increased beyond those set forth in Section G. of this AGREEMENT, provided that the cause or reasons of such extension(s) are not the fault of the CLIENT. J. Excusable Delays The CONSULTANT shall not be in breach of this AGREEMENT by reason of any failure in performance of this AGREEMENT in accordance with its terms if such failure arises out of causes beyond the reasonable control and without the fault or negligence of the CONSULTANT. Such causes may include, but are not restricted or limited to, acts of God or of the public enemy, acts of government in either its sovereign or contractual capacity, Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 7 fires, floods, strikes, and unusually severe weather, but in every case, so long as the failure to perform is beyond the reasonable control and without the fault or negligence of the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall not be deemed to be in breach of this AGREEMENT. K. Termination The CLIENT shall have the right to terminate this AGREEMENT by written prior notice to the CONSULTANT at least five (5)working days before the specified effective date of such termination. In such event, documents and work papers prepared by the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT shall become the property of the CLIENT. On receipt of said documents and work papers by the CLIENT, the CONSULTANT shall receive compensation and reimbursement for the work actually performed before the date of termination, in accordance with Article F, CONSULTANT's Compensation, of this AGREEMENT, less payment for services and expenses previously paid. L. Non-discrimination The CONSULTANT has an Affirmative Action program and shall engage in lawful employment practices. The CONSULTANT shall not fail, refuse to hire, discharge, or otherwise discriminate against any individual with respect to his or her compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or handicap unrelated to the individual's ability to perform the duties of the position. Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 8 M. Extra Work If requested and agreed to in writing by the CLIENT and CONSULTANT, the CONSUL- TANT will be available to furnish, or obtain from others, Extra Work of the following types: 1. Extra work or extended services due to changes in the general scope or timing of the PROJECT, including, but not limited to; changes in size, complexity or character of the work items; acceleration of the work schedule involving services beyond normal working hours; non-delivery of any materials, data, or other information to be furnished by the CLIENT not within the reasonable control of the CONSULTANT. 2. Additional or extended services, including PROJECT administration due to the prolongation of the period of delivery of services specified in this AGREEMENT time through no fault of the CONSULTANT. 3. Attendance at additional meetings beyond those made part of the AGREEMENT. 4. Other additional services requested and agreed to by the CLIENT and CON- SULTANT,which are not otherwise provided for under this AGREEMENT. The compensation and schedule for completing Extra Work authorized by the CLIENT shall be subject to negotiation between the CLIENT and the CONSULTANT in accordance with the provision of Article E (Changes) of this AGREEMENT. However, the hourly rate in effect at the time of any change authorizing Extra Work will continue to be in effect for such Extra Work. N. Entire Agreement This agreement, including the attachments to this agreement, contains the entire agreement of the parties. It may not be changed orally but only by an amendment in writing executed by the parties to this AGREEMENT. Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 9 O. Governing Law This AGREEMENT will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois and within the jurisdiction of Kendall County. P. Client Representative to Consultant The CLIENT designates Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble to act as its representative with respect to the work to be performed under this AGREEMENT, and such person shall have authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define CLIENT's policies and provide decisions in a timely manner pertinent to the work covered by this AGREE- MENT until the CONSULTANT has been advised in writing by the CLIENT that such authority has been revoked. The CONSULTANT designates John Houseal and Nik Davis as the CONSULTANT's representatives to the CLIENT. Q. Conflict of Interest The CONSULTANT certifies that to the best of its knowledge no person associated with the CONSULTANT has any interest that would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the AGREEMENT. R. Default If it should appear at any time that the CONSULTANT has failed, refused, or delayed to perform or satisfy the PROJECT or any other requirement of this Agreement ("Event of Default), and fails to cure any such Event of Default within ten business days after the CONSULTANT's receipt of written notice of such Event of Default from the City, then the City shall have the right, without prejudice to any other remedies provided by law or equity, to pursue any one or more of the following remedies: Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 10 1.Cure by CONSULTANT. The City may require the CONSULTANT, within a reasonable time, to complete or correct all or any part of the PROJECT that is the subject of the Event of Default; and to take any or all other action necessary to bring the CONSULTANT and the PROJECT into compliance with this Agreement. 2.Termination of Agreement by City. The City may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Article K of this Agreement. 3. Withholding of Payment by City. The City may withhold from any payment, whether or not previously approved, or may recover from the CONSULTANT, any and all costs, including attorneys' fees and administrative expenses, incurred by the City as the result of any Event of Default by the Consultant or as a result of actions taken by the City in response to any Event of Default by the CONSULTANT. Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CLIENT and the CONSULTANT have executed this AGREEMENT on the date and year first above written. CONSULTANT: HOUSEAL LAVIGNE ASSOCIATES, LLC. X John seal,AICP Principal Date: March 4, 2019 CLIENT: UNITED CITY KVILLE X 1,d lName/Title: ",,,{ r' Y OtZK " Date: Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 12 ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF SERVICES and HOURLY RATES This section describes the Scope of Services for preparing the Unified Development Ordinance for the United City of Yorkville. Section 1 Whereas the scope of services will be undertaken by the CONSULTANT, it is understood and agreed that the CLIENT will provide the following assistance to the CONSULTANT: 1. The CLIENT, with the CONSULTANT's assistance, will schedule and arrange and provide notices for all meetings and workshops including contacting agencies, individuals and citizens to be invited to meetings. 2. The CLIENT, with the CONSULTANT'S assistance, will collect and compile previously prepared and available reports, projects, studies, maps and other data owned or in control of the CLIENT and that might be useful for the project. 3. The CLIENT will provide to the CONSULTANT an up-to-date base map (electronic and hard copy)for the City, including GIS files and information. Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 13 Section 2 SCOPE OF WORK Below is a detailed, step-by-step, Scope of Work for completing the United City of Yorkville's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) assignment. The Scope of Work contains several steps, including staff meetings; public workshops; "best practices" research and applicability assessment; evaluation of neighborhoods, corridors, and districts; Planning and Zoning Commission and City Commission workshops and meetings, public hearings, development of user-friendly"formats, and more. Step 1: Project Initiation and Outreach Step 1 represents the kick-off of the project and is designed to provide City staff and the consultant team with opportunities to set project expectations and protocols, convey issues and concerns with the existing code, and engage those who administer and are impacted by the code. 1a: Project Initiation—Staff Meeting & Review of Preliminarily Issues This step will include a meeting with City staff to review various aspects of the project, including the schedule, expectations of local appointed and elected leaders, and public outreach and adoption process. The meeting will also provide an opportunity for staff and consultants to discuss any issues related to the present ordinances already identified by staff. If necessary, staff may lead a driving tour of the City to point out specific instances where current zoning and subdivision regulations either conflict with or complement community development objectives. 1b: Planning and Zoning Commission Workshop This step will include a workshop with City staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission PZC)to identify, review, and discuss zoning related matters within the City. The PZC members have a unique perspective and insight into local zoning, planning, and development issues and will provide vital feedback and project focus. They also can articulate frustrations with current ordinances as policy tools, such as difficulties in navigating the document, unclear regulations, inconsistent references or definitions, issues with procedures and enforcement, etc. 1c: Residential Areas Zoning Workshop A workshop will be conducted with City residents to identify, review, and discuss zoning and ordinance related matters pertaining to the City's residential areas/neighborhoods. Attendees could include residents, neighborhood groups, local builders, local residential architects, and more. 1d: Commercial and Industrial Areas Zoning Workshop A workshop will be conducted with business owners and managers in the City. This workshop will allow the local business community to provide input regarding the impact of zoning and subdivision controls on their ability to invest in Yorkville, successfully operate a business, and meet the goals that the City has set forth for development. Attendees should include local business owners and managers, developers, local commercial and industrial property owners, and more. Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 14 1e: Subdivision Ordinance Focus Group We will work with City staff and officials to identify various stakeholders with extensive experience and understanding of the existing Subdivision Ordinance, including members of the development community, engineers, and significant property owners. We will reconcile preliminary findings with stakeholder input to ensure that recommended changes to subdivision regulations are vetted with respect to development realities. 1f: Project Website Houseal Lavigne is recognized as a leader in technology-based outreach and community engagement. For this assignment, we will work with City staff to determine requirements for a project website that can be used to provide information regarding the zoning update process and documents available for review and comment though the course of the project. As an alternative, we can work with existing City protocol to distribute materials for review through the PZC. The most appropriate approach will be determined through conversations with City staff during project initiation. 1g: map.social (Online Map-Based Engagement Platform) (Optional) Should Yorkville see value in implementing a unique project website, as described in step 1 F, we will feature map.social, an interactive web-based community issues mapping tool, on the project website. Developed by Houseal Lavigne, this tool allows users to identify, map, and comment on geographic areas of concern and valued community amenities. map.social simplifies the mapping process and familiarizes users with areas the project may affect in a manner that is exciting, interactive, and effective. Input from users allows us to create a composite map of community issues to assist with the development of the UDO from the perspective of the community. Step 2: Technical Analysis & Best Practices Step 2 includes a full assessment of the current code, as well as the development of a conceptual approach to ensure that the new code addresses local issues and meets statutory requirements. 2a: Assessment of Existing Land Use Regulations A detailed and thorough review of the City's existing ordinances, including Zoning and Subdivision Control Ordinances, Landscape Ordinance, Stormwater Management Ordinance, Appearance Code, Downtown Overlay Districts (adoption pending), and any other relevant ordinances, will be undertaken as a starting point for preparing the new ordinance. The existing code will also be evaluated with respect to the recommendations and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and other adopted policies. This step will highlight areas where the existing zoning district boundaries and related regulations are inconsistent with either what is currently built or what is envisioned as expressed in adopted plans and policies. This will establish a framework for the calibration of regulations to meet these conditions. 2b: "Best Practices" Research and Assessment Extensive research will be undertaken to assess the best practices from around the region and country relating to zoning, development, and subdivision regulations. These best practices will be evaluated for appropriateness and applicability to the Yorkville community. Traditional zoning, form-based codes, hybrid zoning, incentive zoning, planned unit development Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 15 ordinances, processes and procedures will all be examined for potential application to the City, its developed areas, and its anticipated growth areas. The result of this task will be a memorandum identifying relevant best practices and their potential application in Yorkville. The memorandum will include; a summary of issues identified through workshops conducted in Steps 1a-1d, a summary of the assessment of the current code conducted in Step 2a, and a conceptual approach to the new code that will address topics related to: District regulatory metrics and thresholds Structure and navigability of the code document The integration of tables, graphics and other tools to clarify regulations and standards The use of references to other portions of the City's municipal code Administrative procedures and processes, permits and approvals 2c: Form-based Code Applicability Analysis—Evaluation of Neighborhoods, Corridors, Districts The United City of Yorkville is currently preparing a Downtown Overlay District with form-based regulations for Downtown Yorkville. This task will entail the evaluation and analysis of how applicable a form-based zoning approach may be to other areas of the City, such as commercial areas, corridors, residential areas and neighborhoods. It will consider the existing character of various residential and commercial areas, the vision as articulated in the Comprehensive Plan, and other factors that may impact the viability of form-based regulations and their implementation. In any case, this step will result in specific recommendations regarding the applicability and implementation of form-based regulations that will be highlighted in dialogue with the PZC as a part of Step 2e. 2d: City Staff Working Session We will conduct a working session with City staff to 1) review input and findings resulting from various workshops, staff comments and direction, the technical analysis of the existing code, and the legal review of the code, and 2) comprehensively review the existing code and identify an overall direction and outline to present to the PZC. 2e: PZC Meeting This step entails a summary presentation to the PZC of the input received and issues identified in preceding steps. A preliminary approach will be also discussed, and the PZC will be invited to provide feedback regarding the proposed conceptual direction of the new code, and its responsiveness to local issues discussed thus far. This meeting will also include a conversation regarding the recommendations developed as a part of step 2c pertaining to the applicability of further form-based regulations. Step 3: Draft District Standards & Concepts (existing Title 10: Ch. 3, 5— 13) Step 3 includes the development of draft zoning language for all districts identified in the existing code. During this step, we anticipate regular contact with City staff to review incremental recommendations and technical language. The PZC will be engaged at key points to provide input regarding general district regulations, then other regulations that complement the functionality and character of various districts. The creation of new districts and the elimination of some existing districts may be a part of this step. Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 16 3a: Draft Residential and Agricultural District Standards Preliminary Residential and Agricultural District Standards will be prepared for local consideration and discussion, based on community feedback, research and assessment, and community goals and objectives. This phase of the UDO process will focus on district issues and will be presented in an easy to use manner—enabling residents, builders, City officials, and staff to effectively implement the new regulations. This step will include use classifications and standards related to height, coverage, setback, and more. 3b: Draft Commercial and Industrial District Standards Preliminary Commercial and Industrial District Standards will be prepared, similar to Step 3a, however this phase of the UDO process will focus on the City's non-residential areas. These draft standards are intended to respond to the needs of business owners in a manner that is balanced with other City objectives. Both the form and function of the City's commercial and industrial areas will be effectively addressed with the new regulations, in a manner consistent with the priorities of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan. This step will include use classifications and standards related to height, coverage, setback, and more. 3c: Special District Standards (OS, Downtown Overlay) Preliminary District Standards will be prepared for special districts including Open Space, Downtown Overlay districts, and any new overlays.We will work with City staff to carefully review these districts to identify specific problems or concerns that need to be addressed and then prepare standards that improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the special districts as tools to help the City implement its priorities and Comprehensive Plan recommendations. 3d. Proposed Zoning Districts Map Consistent with proposed zoning districts, an official zoning map will be prepared for consideration. The map could reflect new districts, boundary changes to existing districts, or the elimination of some districts. 3e: Staff Review Meeting This step will include a meeting or conference call with City staff to review the draft district regulations, and any proposed map changes. Appropriate modifications will be made prior to presentation to the PZC. 3f: PZC Meeting A meeting will be conducted with the PZC to review and discuss the Draft district standards. Appropriate revisions will be made based on PZC review and discussion. Step 4: General Development Standards exist Title 10: Ch. 14, 16-20, Landscaping, Stormwater Management,Appearance Codes) Step 4 includes the drafting of sections of the code related to "development standards of general applicability". These will include the drafting of sections of the code and regulations that impact all districts, including regulations related to general site development standards, landscaping standards, use-specific regulations, parking design and capacity, and design and location standards. Each set of standards and regulations will include the creation of relevant graphics to illustrate regulatory concepts and standards. Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 17 4a: Preliminary Amendments for Parking, Landscaping, Development Standards, etc. Preliminary amendments for several "non-district" sections of the code will be prepared for local consideration and discussion. These will likely include but not be limited to parking, loading, landscaping, telecommunications infrastructure, alternative energy, definitions, and more. This step will also involve updates and revisions to the sign ordinance. 4b: Staff Review Meeting This task will include a meeting or conference call with City staff to review the draft standards for general development. Appropriate modifications will be made prior to presentation to the PZC. Step 5: Draft Subdivision Design/Improvements (existing Title 11) Step 5 includes modifications to the subdivision code to ensure that it aligns with zoning regulations, the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, and the direction set forth for the new Unified Development Ordinance. 5a: Review of Subdivision Code for Compatibility and Best Practices This Step includes the review of the subdivision control ordinance to ensure that its procedures, requirements and standards align with the Comprehensive Plan and national best practices, as it relates to parks and infrastructure provisions, street and lot dimensions, review and permitting procedures, and approval and appeals, and more. 5b: Draft Modified Subdivision Design/Improvement Regulations This step includes the drafting of a modified subdivision code that reflects input from previous steps. 5c: Staff Review Meeting This step will include a meeting or conference call with City staff to review revisions to subdivision design/improvement regulations prior to incorporation into the Unified Development Ordinance. Appropriate modifications will be made prior to presentation to the PZC. 5d: PZC Meeting A meeting will be conducted with City staff and the PZC to review and discuss draft language developed as part of Steps 4 and 5. At this point in the process, the PZC will be engaged to discuss the regulations guiding development in each district, supplemental regulations, and subdivision regulations applicable throughout the City. Appropriate revisions will be made based on PZC review and discussion. Step 6: Administrative and Procedural Standards existing Title 10: Ch. 1 —2, 4, 15) Step 6 includes the drafting of sections of the code related to administrative processes and support materials. This section will seek to maximize the efficiency of zoning review so that development quality in Yorkville can be improved and permitted, including updates to non- conformity regulations, and procedural requirements for applicants, review standards, and processes for various zoning adjustments(variations, amendments, special uses, planned unit developments, and more). This step also includes the drafting of definitions that will support regulatory concepts and minimize the likelihood of inconsistent interpretation of regulations. Additionally, any relevant graphics will be created to illustrate procedural steps or concepts that Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 18 could otherwise be subject to interpretation. 6a: Draft Administrative, Applications, Approval, and Procedures This step will result in recommendations for application and approval procedures. It will also include flow charts and diagrams clearly articulating such procedures in order to ensure that applicants and code administrators understand who is responsible for various recommendations or approvals. 6b: Staff Review Meeting This step will include a meeting or conference call with City staff to review the draft administrative and procedural standards. Appropriate modifications will be made prior to presentation to the PZC. 6c: PZC Meeting A meeting will be conducted with City staff and the PZC to review and discuss draft language developed as part of Step 6, as it applies to processes and procedures. Appropriate revisions will be made based on PZC review and discussion. Step 7: Draft and Final UDO Step 7 includes the delivery of the Draft Unified Development Ordinance, review and revisions to the Draft UDO, and presentation and adoption of the Final UDO. 7a: Draft UDO Ordinance The draft Unified Development Ordinance will be prepared for local consideration and discussion, based on feedback from previous steps in the planning process. 7b: Staff Review and Meeting A meeting or conference call will be conducted with City staff to review and discuss the Draft UDO. Appropriate revisions will be made based on staff review and discussion. A revised Draft UDO will be prepared for PZC review and discussion. 7c: PZC Meeting A meeting will be conducted with the PZC to review and discuss the Draft Unified Development Ordinance. Appropriate revisions will be made based on PZC feedback. 7d: Revised UDO & Final Legal Review Based on discussion and feedback from staff and the PZC, the revised draft ordinance will be prepared for public hearing. At this time, the City Attorney will also conduct a final legal review to ensure that any modifications are in line with statutory requirements. 7e: Public Hearing A Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing will be conducted consider and recommend action on the draft Unified Development Ordinance. 7f: City Council Presentation and Adoption Following the public hearing and the recommendation of the PZC, appropriate revisions will be Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 19 made, and the Final Unified Development Ordinance will be presented to the City Council for adoption. Step 8: Web-Based "Smart Code" Integration Step 8 includes the creation of an online web-based "smart code"version of the UDO with interactive, site specific zoning analysis capabilities. Houseal Lavigne proposes the following web-based "smart code" option, detailed below. enCode Plus enCode Plus is a web-based document presentation and content management system that is designed to ease navigation, understanding, and use of zoning regulations. Pricing for the use of this system after the UDO is adopted varies based on yearly maintenance fees and optional features. Fees associated with these features will be directly billed from encode plus. Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 20 Section 3 HOURLY RATES Houseal Lavigne Associates Hourly Rates John Houseal........................$205 Nik Davis...............................$185 Carly Petersen......................$120 Jackie Wells..........................$110 Trisha Stevens......................$110 Houseal Lavigne Associates I United City of Yorkville I UDO 21 United City of Yorkville Scope of Services Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Page 1 of 6 United City of Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Houseal Lavigne Associates - Scope of Services Note: Scope is amended to include Advisory Committee workshops (in place of PZC) Step 1: Project Initiation and Outreach Step 1 represents the kick-off of the project and is designed to provide City staff and the consultant team with opportunities to set project expectations and protocols, convey issues and concerns with the existing code, and engage those who administer and are impacted by the code. 1a: Project Initiation – Staff Meeting & Review of Preliminarily Issues This step will include a meeting with City staff to review various aspects of the project, including the schedule, expectations of local appointed and elected leaders, and public outreach and adoption process. The meeting will also provide an opportunity for staff and consultants to discuss any issues related to the present ordinances already identified by staff. If necessary, staff may lead a driving tour of the City to point out specific instances where current zoning and subdivision regulations either conflict with or complement community development objectives. 1b: UDO Advisory Committee Workshop This step will include a workshop with City staff and a Council-approved UDO Advisory Committee to identify, review, and discuss zoning related matters within the City. The UDO Advisory Committee members should bring a unique perspective and insight into local zoning, planning, and development issues and will provide vital feedback and project focus. They also can articulate frustrations with current ordinances as policy tools, such as difficulties in navigating the document, unclear regulations, inconsistent references or definitions, issues with procedures and enforcement, etc. 1c: Residential Areas Zoning Workshop A workshop will be conducted with City residents to identify, review, and discuss zoning and ordinance related matters pertaining to the City’s residential areas/neighborhoods. Attendees could include residents, neighborhood groups, local builders, local residential architects, and more. 1d: Commercial and Industrial Areas Zoning Workshop A workshop will be conducted with business owners and managers in the City. This workshop will allow the local business community to provide input regarding the impact of zoning and subdivision controls on their ability to invest in Yorkville, successfully operate a business, and meet the goals that the City has set forth for development. Attendees should include local business owners and managers, developers, local commercial and industrial property owners, and more. 1e: Subdivision Ordinance Focus Group We will work with City staff and officials to identify various stakeholders with extensive experience and understanding of the existing Subdivision Ordinance, including members of the development community, engineers, and significant property owners. We will reconcile preliminary findings with stakeholder input to ensure that recommended changes to subdivision regulations are vetted with respect to development realities. 1f: Project Website Houseal Lavigne is recognized as a leader in technology-based outreach and community engagement. For this assignment, we will work with City staff to determine requirements for a project website that can be used to United City of Yorkville Scope of Services Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Page 2 of 6 provide information regarding the zoning update process and documents available for review and comment though the course of the project. As an alternative, we can work with existing City protocol to distribute materials for review through the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC). The most appropriate approach will be determined through conversations with City staff during project initiation. 1g: map.social (Online Map-Based Engagement Platform) (Optional) Should Yorkville see value in implementing a unique project website, as described in step 1F, we will feature map.social, an interactive web-based community issues mapping tool, on the project website. Developed by Houseal Lavigne, this tool allows users to identify, map, and comment on geographic areas of concern and valued community amenities. map.social simplifies the mapping process and familiarizes users with areas the project may affect in a manner that is exciting, interactive, and effective. Input from users allows us to create a composite map of community issues to assist with the development of the UDO from the perspective of the community. Step 2: Technical Analysis & Best Practices Step 2 includes a full assessment of the current code, as well as the development of a conceptual approach to ensure that the new code addresses local issues and meets statutory requirements. 2a: Assessment of Existing Land Use Regulations A detailed and thorough review of the City’s existing ordinances, including Zoning and Subdivision Control Ordinances, Landscape Ordinance, Stormwater Management Ordinance, Appearance Code, Downtown Overlay Districts (adoption pending), and any other relevant ordinances, will be undertaken as a starting point for preparing the new ordinance. The existing code will also be evaluated with respect to the recommendations and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and other adopted policies. This step will highlight areas where the existing zoning district boundaries and related regulations are inconsistent with either what is currently built or what is envisioned as expressed in adopted plans and policies. This will establish a framework for the calibration of regulations to meet these conditions. 2b: “Best Practices” Research and Assessment Extensive research will be undertaken to assess the best practices from around the region and country relating to zoning, development, and subdivision regulations. These best practices will be evaluated for appropriateness and applicability to the Yorkville community. Traditional zoning, form-based codes, hybrid zoning, incentive zoning, planned unit development ordinances, processes and procedures will all be examined for potential application to the City, its developed areas, and its anticipated growth areas. The result of this task will be a memorandum identifying relevant best practices and their potential application in Yorkville. The memorandum will include; a summary of issues identified through workshops conducted in Steps 1a-1d, a summary of the assessment of the current code conducted in Step 2a, and a conceptual approach to the new code that will address topics related to: • District regulatory metrics and thresholds • Structure and navigability of the code document • The integration of tables, graphics and other tools to clarify regulations and standards • The use of references to other portions of the City’s municipal code • Administrative procedures and processes, permits and approvals 2c: Form-based Code Applicability Analysis – Evaluation of Neighborhoods, Corridors, Districts The United City of Yorkville is currently preparing a Downtown Overlay District with form-based regulations for Downtown Yorkville. This task will entail the evaluation and analysis of how applicable a form-based zoning approach may be to other areas of the City, such as commercial areas, corridors, residential areas and United City of Yorkville Scope of Services Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Page 3 of 6 neighborhoods. It will consider the existing character of various residential and commercial areas, the vision as articulated in the Comprehensive Plan, and other factors that may impact the viability of form-based regulations and their implementation. In any case, this step will result in specific recommendations regarding the applicability and implementation of form-based regulations that will be highlighted in dialogue with the UDO Advisory Committee as a part of Step 2e. 2d: City Staff Working Session We will conduct a working session with City staff to 1) review input and findings resulting from various workshops, staff comments and direction, the technical analysis of the existing code, and the legal review of the code, and 2) comprehensively review the existing code and identify an overall direction and outline to present to the UDO Advisory Committee. 2e: UDO Advisory Committee Meeting This step entails a summary presentation to the UDO Advisory Committee of the input received and issues identified in preceding steps. A preliminary approach will be also discussed, and the committee will be invited to provide feedback regarding the proposed conceptual direction of the new code, and its responsiveness to local issues discussed thus far. This meeting will also include a conversation regarding the recommendations developed as a part of step 2c pertaining to the applicability of further form-based regulations. Step 3: Draft District Standards & Concepts Step 3 includes the development of draft zoning language for all districts identified in the existing code. During this step, we anticipate regular contact with City staff to review incremental recommendations and technical language. The UDO Advisory Committee will be engaged at key points to provide input regarding general district regulations, then other regulations that complement the functionality and character of various districts. The creation of new districts and the elimination of some existing districts may be a part of this step. 3a: Draft Residential and Agricultural District Standards Preliminary Residential and Agricultural District Standards will be prepared for local consideration and discussion, based on community feedback, research and assessment, and community goals and objectives. This phase of the UDO process will focus on district issues and will be presented in an easy to use manner—enabling residents, builders, City officials, and staff to effectively implement the new regulations. This step will include use classifications and standards related to height, coverage, setback, and more. 3b: Draft Commercial and Industrial District Standards Preliminary Commercial and Industrial District Standards will be prepared, similar to Step 3a, however this phase of the UDO process will focus on the City’s non-residential areas. These draft standards are intended to respond to the needs of business owners in a manner that is balanced with other City objectives. Both the form and function of the City’s commercial and industrial areas will be effectively addressed with the new regulations, in a manner consistent with the priorities of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan. This step will include use classifications and standards related to height, coverage, setback, and more. 3c: Special District Standards (OS, Downtown Overlay) Preliminary District Standards will be prepared for special districts including Open Space, Downtown Overlay districts, and any new overlays. We will work with City staff to carefully review these districts to identify specific problems or concerns that need to be addressed and then prepare standards that improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the special districts as tools to help the City implement its priorities and Comprehensive Plan recommendations. United City of Yorkville Scope of Services Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Page 4 of 6 3d. Proposed Zoning Districts Map Consistent with proposed zoning districts, an official zoning map will be prepared for consideration. The map could reflect new districts, boundary changes to existing districts, or the elimination of some districts. 3e: Staff Review Meeting This step will include a meeting or conference call with City staff to review the draft district regulations, and any proposed map changes. Appropriate modifications will be made prior to presentation to the UDO Advisory Committee. 3f: UDO Advisory Committee Meeting A meeting will be conducted with the UDO Advisory Committee to review and discuss the Draft district standards. Appropriate revisions will be made based on committee review and discussion. Step 4: General Development Standards Step 4 includes the drafting of sections of the code related to “development standards of general applicability”. These will include the drafting of sections of the code and regulations that impact all districts, including regulations related to general site development standards, landscaping standards, use-specific regulations, parking design and capacity, and design and location standards. Each set of standards and regulations will include the creation of relevant graphics to illustrate regulatory concepts and standards. 4a: Preliminary Amendments for Parking, Landscaping, Development Standards, etc. Preliminary amendments for several “non-district” sections of the code will be prepared for local consideration and discussion. These will likely include but not be limited to parking, loading, landscaping, telecommunications infrastructure, alternative energy, definitions, and more. This step will also involve updates and revisions to the sign ordinance. 4b: Staff Review Meeting This task will include a meeting or conference call with City staff to review the draft standards for general development. Appropriate modifications will be made prior to presentation to the UDO Advisory Committee. Step 5: Draft Subdivision Design/Improvements Step 5 includes modifications to the subdivision code to ensure that it aligns with zoning regulations, the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, and the direction set forth for the new Unified Development Ordinance. 5a: Review of Subdivision Code for Compatibility and Best Practices This Step includes the review of the subdivision control ordinance to ensure that its procedures, requirements and standards align with the Comprehensive Plan and national best practices, as it relates to parks and infrastructure provisions, street and lot dimensions, review and permitting procedures, and approval and appeals, and more. 5b: Draft Modified Subdivision Design/Improvement Regulations This step includes the drafting of a modified subdivision code that reflects input from previous steps. 5c: Staff Review Meeting This step will include a meeting or conference call with City staff to review revisions to subdivision design/improvement regulations prior to incorporation into the Unified Development Ordinance. Appropriate modifications will be made prior to presentation to the UDO Advisory Committee. United City of Yorkville Scope of Services Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Page 5 of 6 5d: UDO Advisory Committee Meeting A meeting will be conducted with City staff and the UDO Advisory Committee to review and discuss draft language developed as part of Steps 4 and 5. At this point in the process, the committee will be engaged to discuss the regulations guiding development in each district, supplemental regulations, and subdivision regulations applicable throughout the City. Appropriate revisions will be made based on committee review and discussion. Step 6: Administrative and Procedural Standards Step 6 includes the drafting of sections of the code related to administrative processes and support materials. This section will seek to maximize the efficiency of zoning review so that development quality in Yorkville can be improved and permitted, including updates to non-conformity regulations, and procedural requirements for applicants, review standards, and processes for various zoning adjustments (variations, amendments, special uses, planned unit developments, and more). This step also includes the drafting of definitions that will support regulatory concepts and minimize the likelihood of inconsistent interpretation of regulations. Additionally, any relevant graphics will be created to illustrate procedural steps or concepts that could otherwise be subject to interpretation. 6a: Draft Administrative, Applications, Approval, and Procedures This step will result in recommendations for application and approval procedures. It will also include flow charts and diagrams clearly articulating such procedures in order to ensure that applicants and code administrators understand who is responsible for various recommendations or approvals. 6b: Staff Review Meeting This step will include a meeting or conference call with City staff to review the draft administrative and procedural standards. Appropriate modifications will be made prior to presentation to the UDO Advisory Committee. 6c: UDO Advisory Committee Meeting A meeting will be conducted with City staff and the UDO Advisory Committee to review and discuss draft language developed as part of Step 6, as it applies to processes and procedures. Appropriate revisions will be made based on committee review and discussion. Step 7: Draft and Final UDO Step 7 includes the delivery of the Draft Unified Development Ordinance, review and revisions to the Draft UDO, and presentation and adoption of the Final UDO. 7a: Draft UDO Ordinance The draft Unified Development Ordinance will be prepared for local consideration and discussion, based on feedback from previous steps in the planning process. 7b: Staff Review and Meeting A meeting or conference call will be conducted with City staff to review and discuss the Draft UDO. Appropriate revisions will be made based on staff review and discussion. A revised Draft UDO will be prepared for UDO Advisory Committee review and discussion. 7c: UDO Advisory Committee Meeting A meeting will be conducted with the UDO Advisory Committee to review and discuss the Draft Unified Development Ordinance. Appropriate revisions will be made based on committee feedback. United City of Yorkville Scope of Services Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Page 6 of 6 7d: Revised UDO & Final Legal Review Based on discussion and feedback from staff and the UDO Advisory Committee, the revised draft ordinance will be prepared for public hearing. At this time, the City Attorney will also conduct a final legal review to ensure that any modifications are in line with statutory requirements. 7e: PZC Public Hearing A Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing will be conducted consider and recommend action on the draft Unified Development Ordinance. 7f: City Council Presentation and Adoption Following the public hearing and the recommendation of the PZC, appropriate revisions will be made, and the Final Unified Development Ordinance will be presented to the City Council for adoption. Step 8: Web-Based “Smart Code” Integration Step 8 includes the creation of an online web-based “smart code” version of the UDO with interactive, site specific zoning analysis capabilities. Houseal Lavigne proposes the following web-based “smart code” option, detailed below. enCode Plus enCode Plus is a web-based document presentation and content management system that is designed to ease navigation, understanding, and use of zoning regulations. Pricing for the use of this system after the UDO is adopted varies based on yearly maintenance fees and optional features. Fees associated with these features will be directly billed from enCode Plus. CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 1 of 15 04.02.2019 enCodePlusTM Software License Advanced 180o LICENSEE: YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS This Software License (“Agreement” or “License”) is made as of the date of the last signature below, between the United City of Yorkville, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the “Licensee” and enCodePlus, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, hereinafter referred to as “Licensor”, do hereby make and enter into the following license agreement. 1) License Grant. This is an Agreement between Licensor and Licensee, with a term as set out in Section 3, below. Licensor grants licensee a non-transferable, non-exclusive, limited, non-assignable license with no right to sublicense, to use the software covered by this Agreement pursuant to the terms of this Agreement including payment of all applicable License Fees. This License gives only certain rights to Licensee. All other rights are reserved to Licensor. 2) Software Covered by this License. The terms of this Agreement apply to Licensee’s use of the following software: Advanced 180o, including unlimited licenses seats and four hours of annual technical support. 3) Term of License. a) The term of this Agreement is the period from April 15, 2019 through April 14, 2020, and is automatically renewable annually thereafter. b) Termination, where permitted under this agreement, shall be effected by providing the other party with written notice of termination delivered at least 30 days prior to the date of termination for an early termination pursuant to this subparagraph 3.b, or two (2) months prior to the date of termination for a termination pursuant to subparagraph 3.c. Upon receipt of notice pursuant to this subparagraph to terminate this Agreement, fees for such maintenance and support paid in advance, if any, shall be returned to the Licensee on a pro rata basis. Early termination shall mean, for purposes of this Agreement, termination during the initial term of the Agreement or, in the event of an automatic renewal, termination more than six (6) months prior to the next automatic annual renewal. Early termination is permitted by either party in the event of a material breach by the other party by giving notice of termination as required in subparagraph 3.b, provided, however, no such termination shall become effective if the breaching party cures the breach within 30 days of the termination notice or, if it is not possible to fully cure the breach within said time period, commences cure and diligently pursues the same to conclusion. Licensor if, in Licensor’s sole discretion, changes in Internet technologies (including software platforms, web browsers, and other technologies that allow the Software to operate) make Licensor’s performance of this Agreement technically infeasible. CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 2 of 15 04.02.2019 c) Licensee may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason if notice of termination is delivered at least two (2) months prior to the date of termination. 4) Upon termination of this Agreement, Licensor is not obligated to return Licensee’s content to Licensee. Licensee has full, unlimited access to the content through its password-protected maintenance module. This access allows the City to export the content to Microsoft Word and Adobe PDF. Also, as set out in Section 15, Security and Backup, the Licensee may save the document at any time in HTML format or as a web archive file. Licensee is advised to keep backups of its content. For an additional fee based on Licensor’s then-current technical support rates, Licensor may offer export services to convert content into other file formats and deliver them to Licensee electronically or on optical or other solid-state media. 5) Build Fees. The fee of $1,875 for Houseal Lavigne (Consultant Partner) to draft the UDO in the online format is waived with the upgrade. The one-time build fee for the Advanced 180o features (parking, shared parking, landscaping, bufferyard, signage, development yield, and f ee calculators) is $17,500, less a $2,625 discount (15%) for a total build amount of $14,875. The build fees are due as follows: a) Execution of Agreement: 50% ($7,438) b) Delivery: 50% ($7,437) 6) Exclusions. This license excludes the following features: AppTrak+, Custom Site Design, Project Website, GIS and MLS integration, Escrow, MuniPro, Cloud Library, Definition Library, and Auto -Notification. 7) License Fees. The annual license fee, payable upon execution of this License and each subsequent year that this License is renewed, is $5,250. 8) Subsequent years: The license fee for the 2020-2021 license year and subsequent years will be the standard license fee that enCodePlus, LLC charges for comparable Advanced 180o implementations. a) Subsequent Years: Licensor will notify the City in writing at least two months in advance of the first date of the contract term regarding the amount of the annual license fee for subsequent license years. If Licensor fails to provide such timely notice, then the Licensee shall pay either the amount identified in subparagraph 7, or the amount identified in Licensor’s defective notice for such one-year term, whichever is less. b) As applicable, the annual escrow fee payment set forth in Section 19 is due and payable with the annual license fee. c) If any payment due under this Agreement ("Payment Due") is more than 15 days past due, a fee of 10% (ten percent) of the Payment Due shall be paid by Licensee as an Administrative Fee in addition to the Payment Due. If Payment Due is more than 30 days late, the Administrative Fee shall be 20% in addition to the Payment Due. If Payment Due is more than 45 days late, the enCodePlus site will be taken off line, and will not be restored until the Payments Due and any Administrative Fees associated with each Payment Due has been paid in full. CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 3 of 15 04.02.2019 9) Scope of License / Use of Software. The Software is an Internet-based information processing and publication service that uses content created by Licensee, or by Licensor under separate agreement with Licensee. Licensor will provide Licensee access to the Internet-based interfaces, including password-protected access to maintenance features, as may be applicable to the Software. Licensee may use the Software through its Internet- based interfaces as follows: a) encodePlusTM may be used to develop, view, access, use, print, copy, edit, publish, utilize, administer, amend, repeal, and solicit, and process comments on the Unified Development Ordinance; and b) Other uses as prescribed by this or subsequent agreements between Licensor and Licensee. 10) Limitations on Use of Software. Licensee must not: a) Reverse engineer, reverse assemble, decompile or disassemble the Software, or otherwise attempt to derive source code from the Software or any component thereof; b) Publish or distribute materials for which Licensee does not have intellectual property rights, or which are outside of the scope of this License; c) Access the server-side programs and source code upon which the Software is based, except to use the Internet-based interfaces provided by Licensor, and except for the HTML and browser-based script code that the server-side programs generate and deliver to end-users; d) Alter the functionality of the software including by composition or injection of unapproved software or services; e) Copy, reproduce, modify, sell, lease, sub-license, market, or commercially exploit in any way the Software or any component thereof (including the further distribution or blank forms or templates) other than as expressly agreed to in this Agreement; and f) Use, or permit the use of, the Software except within the scope set out in Section 8. Licensee agrees that it shall not provide access to or perform services for third parties using the Software including, but not limited to, any service bureau, time-sharing, lease, distribution or re-sale, rental, application service provider arrangement, or any other arrangement. 11) Warranty Against Infringement. a) Licensor warrants that the copyright in and to the Software is owned by Licensor or is distributed by Licensor under a valid current license, that it has the right to license the Software, and that there are no pending liens, claims, or encumbrances against the Software or Licensor pertaining to the Software. Licensor agrees to notify Licensee of any actual or anticipated claims made against it or its customers for patent or copyright infringement in the use of the Software. Licensor agrees to indemnify, h old harmless, and defend Licensee against any and all patent or copyright infringement claims that may be brought against Licensee as the result of its use of the Software as authorized by this License. Licensee shall have the right to participate in the defense of any such claims for patent or copyright infringement at Licensee's cost and expense. In the event that it is determined that the Software infringes on any patent or copyright, CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 4 of 15 04.02.2019 Licensor may (i) procure for the Licensee the right to continue using the Software; (ii) modify the Software so that it becomes non-infringing but continues to provide the same functionality as the original Software; (iii) replace the software with non-infringing software that continues to provide the same functionality as the original Software; or (iv) if modification or replacement cannot be accomplished in a manner that continues to provide the same functionality, Licensee may terminate this License and Licensor will refund to Licensee its pro-rated license fee for the balance of the year in which the infringement was determined. b) Licensee warrants that the copyright in and to the Content created and/or provided by Licensee for Licensor to use in the Software ("Licensee Content") is owned by Licensee or is published or distributed by Licensee under a valid current license, that Licensee has the right to license, use, publish or distribute the Licensee Content it provides to Licensor for use in the Software, and that there are no pending liens, claims, or encumbrances against the Licensee Content or Licensee pertaining to the Licensee Content. Licensee grants to Licensor a royalty-free, non-exclusive license: to use the Licensee Content for any purposes, including, without limitation, using, accessing, reproducing or displaying the Licensee Content within the Licensor's enCodePlusTM Software; to reproduce the Licensee Content; to prepare derivative works based upon the Licensee Content; to distribute copies of the Licensee Content; to publish the Licensee Content; and to display the Licensee Content. Licensee agrees to notify Licensor of any actual or anticipated claims made against it or its customers for patent or copyright infringement in the use of the Licensee Content. Licensor shall have the right to participate in the defense of any claims for patent or copyright infringement at Licensor's cost and expense. In the event that it is determined that the Licensee Content infringes on any patent or copyright, Licensee may (i) procure for the Licensor the right to continue using the Licensee Content; (ii) modify the Licensee Content so that it becomes non -infringing but continues to provide the same functionality as the original Licensee Content; (iii) replace the Licensee Content with non -infringing content that continues to provide the same functionality as the original content; or (iv) if modification or replacement cannot be accomplished in a manner that continues to provide the same functionality, Licensor may terminate this License. 12) Limitations of Software. The Software is provided to facilitate access to information via the Internet. The Software is not a substitute for human judgment, which is necessary for administration of ordinances , plans, and administrative rules. 13) Technical Support. a) Included with the Advanced 180o license is four hours of annual technical support. Licensor will provide technical support at a rate of $100 per hour ($175 per hour for GIS technical support) for additional hours of support. Thereafter, technical support fees are subject to annual adjustment, and will be based on the standard schedule of professional fees for the year in which the support occurs. b) Licensor agrees to provide telephone or web-based technical support regarding the use of service to Licensee within two business days of telephone contact by Licensee during Licensor’s business hours, or at a mutually agreeable time. Licensor makes no promises as to the duration of a resolution, except that CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 5 of 15 04.02.2019 Licensor shall expedite the resolution to the best of its reasonable ability, and Licensor may deem a request as unresolvable. c) With respect to addressing errors which may arise in the Software, Licensor agrees to commence its best efforts to resolve such errors as soon as reasonably possible after notice by Licensee . Generally, Licensor will commence error resolution on the same day as the notice, and if reasonably practicable, will provide Licensee with Licensor’s best good-faith estimate of the time which will be required to resolve the error. Licensee shall not be charged any technical support fee or other charge for addressing or correcting errors in the Software itself. d) Failure of Licensor to achieve the technical support response times set out in S ubsections 12.b. and 12.c. shall not constitute a material breach of this Agreement. 14) Annual License Fee Discounts for Major Service Interruptions Due to Changes by Licensor. a) There will be reductions in the annual license fee if there is a complete inability to use both the user module and the maintenance module (hereinafter “major service interruption”) of the Software as a result of changes to the Software made by Licensor, as follows: i. If a major service interruption lasts more than two, but less than five consecutive days, the annual license fee for the following license year will be reduced by 10 percent. ii. If a major service interruption lasts more than five days, but less than 14 consecutive days, the annual license fee for the following license year will be reduced by 25 percent. iii. If a major service interruption lasts more than 14 days, but less than 30 consecutive days, the annual license fee for the following license year will be reduced by 50 percent. b) If a major service interruption lasts more than 30 consecutive days, the annual license fee for the following license year shall be waived. c) The reductions of license fees that are provided by this Section are not cumulative. If more than one service interruption occurs during a license year, then only the discount that applies to the longest of the service interruptions shall be applied. d) This Section does not apply to outages that are attributable to failures of a third-party Internet Service Provider that hosts the Software. e) If a failure by a third-party Internet Service Provider impacts the use of the Software for more than five consecutive days, Licensor will seek another Internet Service Provider to host the Software. The selection of a new Internet Service Provider will be in Licensor’s sole discretion, however, Licensor will seek quality providers with secure data centers, geographic redundancy, the ability to bring up new instances in a short time frame, and excluding planned downtime, either 99.9 percent or greater guarantee for storage uptime or a strong track-record of service reliability. CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 6 of 15 04.02.2019 15) Updates and Upgrades. a) Licensor will keep the Software in operational condition on a server hosted by Licensor or a third-party Internet Service Provider. Although Licensor selects its Internet Service Providers based on their reputation for reliability and service, Licensor does not guarantee 100 percent uptime. Licensor will promptly notify the Licensor’s contact listed in Section 24 by electronic mail if its Internet Service Provider or third-party hosting service experiences an outage that prevents or severely limits access to the Software for a period in excess of 15 minutes per day or cumulative period in excess of 15 minutes per day . b) Licensor may, at its sole option, apply minor updates from time to time and will provide notice to Licensee within two business days of applying minor updates. Generally, minor updates are those updates which ensure compatibility with server or browser technologies or provide additional data security or enhance system stability or operability of the software. c) Licensor may develop major upgrades to the functionality or interfaces of the software from time to time and will provide notice to Licensee within two business days before applying major upgrades. Such major upgrades that affect data security, system compatibility or stability, or operability will be offered at no additional cost during the term of this Agreement. Major upgrades that include functional changes, such as new or customized features, may be offered to Licensee for an additional fee (which may include an additional annual license fee) to be determined by Licensor when they are released. The Licensee may choose to accept or deny major upgrades that involve new or customized features requiring an additional fee. If Licensee declines a major upgrade, Licensee’s software version will be maintained intact through the license term. d) The Software requires the use of an Internet browser. As of the effective date of this Software License, the Software is fully operable using Microsoft Internet Explorer (IE) 10 and 11. The browser version is supported by the current and one previous major version. On an additional fee basis, Licensee may include a rider to this Agreement to maintain the operability of previous versions other than those provided for in this Agreement. Other browsers supported for desktop editions include FireFox, Chrome, and Safari. Licensor does not guarantee full operability in all browsers, because browser technology changes from time to time. e) Licensor may from time to time, in its sole discretion, change some or all of the functionality or any component of the Software or make any modification for the purpose of improving the performance, service quality, error correction or to maintain the responsiveness of the Software. Such changes shall not negatively impair the overall functionality of the Software. 16) Security and Backup. a) Licensor provides password-level security to the maintenance module of the Software, which allows Licensee to edit regulatory text, upload and link to graphics and multimedia components, create usernames and passwords for Licensee’s staff, and review and respond to public comments. Licensee is responsible CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 7 of 15 04.02.2019 for the securing of passwords and preventing their unauthorized use . Licensee may not select a username which is identical to that used by another person or use a username which is in the sole opinion of Licensor offensive or inappropriate. Licensee shall be solely responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of their password. Licensee is solely responsible for all usage or activity on Licensee’s account, including but not limited to use of Licensee’s account, Licensee’s user name, and Licensee’s password by any third party. Any fraudulent, abusive, or otherwise illegal activity may be grounds for termination of Licensee’s account, in Licensor’s sole discretion, and Licensor may refer Licensee to appropriate law enforcement agencies. b) Licensee is advised to maintain a current off -line backup of the data stored in the Software. A complete version of the published code document is available at: http://online.enCodePlus.com/regs/yorkville- il/maintain/allcodepub.asp. This document may be saved as a web archive file. 17) Ownership of Content. a) Licensee is the sole owner of all documents and information provided by Licensee that will be accessed by Licensee and others through use of the Software. Nothing in this License grants Licensor any interest in said documents and information and the Licensee has the sole rights to use and to authorize others to use the documents and information regardless of whether this License remains in effect. b) Licensor may post “terms of service” on web pages that are used to access the Software, which may disclaim: (1) any interest of Licensor in Licensee’s contents; (2) any liability for use of Licensor’s contents; and (3) any damages that may occur due to malware, viruses, or other malicious code that may be accessible through Licensee’s content. c) Licensor will not charge for public access to Licensee’s content. However, Licensor may develop fee-based services, such as automatic notification of code updates. If Licensor develops such services, they will be considered a “major upgrade,” and Licensor will negotiate with Licensee with respect to pricing and distribution of proceeds. 18) Intellectual Property Rights. Licensor shall retain all ownership, title, copyright, patent, trademark, and other proprietary rights in and to the Software and any component thereof, and all content, features, and functionalities of the Software. Licensee does not acquire any rights, express or implied, in the Software, other than those specified in this Agreement. 19) Software Escrow. If selected as an option and reflected in Paragraph 5, Build Fees, Licensor shall place all source code constituting and relating to the Software into an escrow account pursuant to the terms of an escrow agreement (the “Escrow Agreement”) to be entered into between Licensor and the escrow agent (the “Escrow Agent”) which shall name Licensee as a beneficiary; provided, however, that the Escrow Agree ment shall contain substantially the following conditions with respect to release of escrow to Licensee: (i) Licensor is adjudged bankrupt, and/or (ii) in the event of a catastrophic l oss which terminates Licensor’s operations, then Licensee shall have a non-exclusive, royalty-free, perpetual, worldwide license to use the source code released CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 8 of 15 04.02.2019 from the escrow in its sole discretion, solely for its own internal use and not for any resell, license , or sub- license. In consideration of Licensor placing the source code in escrow, Licensee will pay an annual escrow fee of $1,000, plus a $500 escrow initiation fee, for the first license year and an annual source code escrow fee of $1,000 thereafter. All charges for additional services which may be requested from the escrow company by Licensee as a beneficiary to the escrow agreement shall be payable by Licensee. 20) LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. Neither Licensor not Licensee shall be liable to the other party for special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages for any loss or claim by either party. 21) LIMITATION OF DAMAGES. Except as provided in Sections 9, 10 and 11, and except for bodily injury or violations of Section 21, it is understood and agreed that neither party’s liability, whether in contract or tort, shall exceed the amount received by Licensor from Licensee for the license year in which a cause of action arose, the license fee stated in Subsection 7 is consideration in limiting damages available to each party. 22) Confidential Information. a) For purposes of this Agreement, “Confidential Information” means any software program(s) for electronic data processing and the documentation thereof, and plans, designs, drawings, specifications and trade secrets prepared by Licensor and which remain the property of Licensor. b) Each party acknowledges that Confidential Information may be exchanged between the parties pursuant to this Agreement. Each party shall use no less than the same means it uses to protect its similar confidential and proprietary information, but in any event not less than reasonable means, to prevent the disclosure and to protect the confidentiality of the Confidential Information of the other party. Each party agrees that it will not disclose or use the Confidential Information of the other party except for the purposes of this Agreement. Licensee expressly agrees that, unless ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction, it will not disclose any confidential information, as defined herein, without first obtaining the approval of Licensor in writing. Licensee will promptly report to Licensor any disclosure of Licensor’s Confidential Information that the Licensee becomes aware of and provide reasona ble assistance to Licensor in the investigation and prosecution of any such unauthorized use or disclosure. c) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the recipient of Confidential Information may use or disclose the Confidential Information to the extent that such Co nfidential Information is: (i) already known by the recipient without an obligation of confidentiality, (ii) publicly known or becomes publicly known through no unauthorized act of the recipient, (iii) rightfully received from a third party without any obligation of confidentiality, (iv) independently developed by the recipient without use of the Confidential Information of the disclosing party, (v) approved by the disclosing party for disclosure, or (vi) required to be disclosed pursuant to a requirement of a governmental agency or law so long as the recipient provides the disclosing party with notice of such requirement prior to any such disclosure and takes reasonable steps available to maintain the information in confidence, including allowing the disclosing party to participate in proceedings to defend the confidentiality of the Confidential Information should the Licensee decide to do so in its discretion. CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 9 of 15 04.02.2019 d) Licensor acknowledges that Licensee is a public entity subject to the requirements of the Illinois Freedom of Information Act and that Licensee shall endeavor to maintain the confidentiality of the Confidential Information of Licensor subject to the requirements of the Illinois Freedom of Information Act and except to the extent, Licensee’s employees have a need to access such Licensor Confidential Information in order to enable the Licensee to exercise its rights under this Agreement. Nothing in this Paragraph shall be construed to relieve Licensee of any of the duties and provisions of Subsection 22.b., above. Licensee agrees to notify the Licensor of its intent to provide information relating to this Agreement or the software pursuant to a public information request which the Licensee has determined does not constitut e confidential information. It is the responsibility of Licensor to seek injunctive relief if the Licensor and Licensee disagree on what constitutes confidential information which Licensee shall not disclose in response to an open records request. e) Licensee agrees not to use, or allow its employees or independent contractors to use, the Software and / or Licensor’s Confidential Information to create any computer software or documentation that is substantially similar to the Software or its related documentation. 23) Return of Confidential Information. Upon the termination of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever, each party may request of the other that all documents, information, data, and/or software however recorded, which contain any of the other’s Confidential Information be returned, provided that the party shall be entitled to charge a reasonable fees and materials charge for doing so. If no request is received for the return of Confidential Information within thirty (30) days of the termination of this Agreement, the Confidential Information shall be destroyed within a reasonable time thereafter and shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever. 24) Notices. a) Generally. Except as provided in Subsection 22.b., notices delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent to the people and addresses shown in this Section. Generally, notices shall be delivered by First Class Mail or courier service. Such notice shall be deemed to have been given when deposited in the United States Mail or courier service properly addressed to the intended recipient. To Licensor To Licensee Bret C. Keast, AICP, President enCodePlus, LLC 1415 Highway 6, Suite A-300 Sugar Land, TX 77478 Tel: (281) 302-5847 Email: bret@enCodePlus.com With copy to: William G. Harger, Attorney at Law William G. Harger & Associates, PLLC 704 Main Street Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP, CD Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Tel: (630) 553-8573 Email: noble@yorkville.il.us With a copy to: Kathleen Field Orr Kathleen Field Orr & Associates 53 West Jackson Blvd. CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 10 of 15 04.02.2019 Richmond, Texas 77469 Tel: (281) 202-6000 Fax: (281) 715-4343 fax Email: harger@hargerlaw.com m Suite 964 Chicago, Illinois 60604 Tel: (312) 382-2113 Email: kfo@kfoassoc.com b) Upgrades, Maintenance, Service Interruptions, and Planned Outages. Notices regarding upgrades, maintenance, service interruptions, and planned outages shall be delivered by electronic mail to the Senior Planner or designee. Licensee may change the individuals who receive notice pursuant to this subsection by electronic mail notice to Licensor. 25) Assignment. Licensor may not assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement without prior written notice to Licensee no less than 30 days prior to assignment. Licensee may thereafter continue with the terms of this Agreement attempt to renegotiate with the assignee, or terminate this license pursuant to the provisions of Section 3, Term of License. 26) Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no third-party beneficiaries to this Agreement. 27) No Waiver. The failure of either party to exercise or enforce any right or provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of such right or provision. 28) Effective Date. The effective date shall be the date on which the Licensee executes this Agreement, or such other date as may be agreed to by the parties and indicated as “Effective Date” below. a) Licensor and Licensee agree that this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois. Venue for all actions brought pursuant to this agreement is in Kendall County, Illinois; and all parties consent to Kendall County, Illinois, being the exclusive jurisdiction to resolve said claims or controversies arising pursuant to this agreement. The parties will attempt in good faith to resolve any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement promptly by negotiation between senior executives of the parties who have the authority to settle the controversy. b) The disputing party shall give the other party written notice of the dispute. The other party shall respond in writing within 10 days after receipt of said notice. The notice and response shall include: (1) a statement of the party’s position and a summary of the facts and arguments supporting its position; and (2) the name and title of the executive who will represent the party. The executives shall meet at a mutually acceptable time and place within 20 days of the date of the disputing party’s notice and thereafter as often a s they reasonably deem necessary to exchange relevant information and to attempt to resolve the dispute. c) If the matter has not been resolved within 90 days of the commencement of such procedure, parties may bring their claim in a court of law. Venue for all actions brought pursuant to this agreement is in Kendall County, Illinois; and all parties consent to Kendall County, Illinois, being the exclusive jurisdiction to resolve said claims or controversies arising pursuant to this agreement. CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 11 of 15 04.02.2019 d) Nothing in this Section shall prevent a Party from bringing an action for injunctive relief if such relief is necessary for the protection of a right or property or proprietary information which might be lost absent such relief. 29) Integration. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with regard to the subject matter hereof and thereof. This Agreement supersedes all previous agreements between or among the parties. There are no agreements, representations, or warranties between or among the parties other than those set forth in this Agreement or the documents and agreements referred to in this Agreement. 30) Force Majeure. Neither party shall not be deemed in default of this Agreement to the extent that performance of its obligations or attempts to cure any breach are delayed or prevented by reason of any act of God, fire, natural disaster, or act of government provided that written notice thereof is provided to the other party promptly upon discovery thereof and uses its best efforts to cure the delay. 31) Amendments and Modifications. Together with the separately executed Professional Services Agreement for the Unified Development Ordinance regarding the build fees set out in Paragraph 5, this Agreement constitutes the parties’ entire agreement. No amendment, modification, or supplement to this Agreement shall be binding on any of the parties unless it is in writing and signed by the parties. 32) General Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement have been negotiated by the parties hereto and the language used in this Agreement shall be deemed to be the language chosen by the parties hereto to express their mutual intent. This Agreement shall be construed without regard to any presumption or rule requiring construction against the party causing such instrument or any portion thereof to be drafted, or in favor of the party receiving a particular benefit under the agreement. No rule of strict construction will be appli ed against any person. 33) Further Assurances. Each of the parties agree to take such further action to execute and deliver such additional documents as may be reasonably required to them to effectuate the purpose and intent of this Agreement. 34) Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement is determined to be illegal, unenforceable, or invalid in whole or in part for any reason, such illegal, unenforceable, or invalid provisions or part thereof shall be stricken from this Agreement, and such provision shall not affect the legality, enforceability, or validity of the remainder of this Agreement. If any provision or part thereof of this Agreement is stricken in accordance with the provisions of this section, then this stricken provision shall be replaced, to the extent possible, with a legal, enforceable, and valid provision that is as similar in tenor to the stricken provision as is legally possible. CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 12 of 15 04.02.2019 April 15, 2019 Effective Date enCodePlus, LLC Licensee Licensor Authorized Agent Signature Authorized Agent Signature Bret C. Keast, President Authorized Agent (Typed) Authorized Agent (Typed) Date Date CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 13 of 15 04.02.2019 EXHIBIT A REQUEST FOR USER NAME AND PASSWORD The City of Yorkville, Illinois (“Licensee”) requests that a new password be issued by enCodePlus, LLC (“Licensor”) for the benefit of Licensee to enable the undersigned user (“User”) to access and use the maintenance module and User Guide for the software program. Licensee and the undersigned agree to comply with the below provisions of the license agreement between Licensor and Licensee: Licensee agrees that each of Licensee’s employees having administrative or maintenance access to the Software, and at the full discretion of Licensor, contract workers and any third parties acting on behalf of Licensee or any other person or entity acting as an agent for Licensee in any capacity, shall be identified to Licensor and issued a unique password. Each person receiving a password must first complete and sign the user acknowledgment form below. Submission of such acknowledgment form will constitute a request by Licensee for issuance of a new password for a particular individual, and upon receipt of a completed acknowledgment form, Licensor will issue a password for that individual user. Passwords are not transferable. When Licensee becomes aware that a user will no longer need a password, for any reason, Licensee agrees to immediately notify Licensor that the password is no longer active. Any replacement users will be issued a new password. Licensee assumes full responsibility for any improper use of a password issued at the request of Licensee, and indemnifies Licensor from any loss by or damage to Licensor that may occur as a result of an improper use of any such password. The undersigned supervisor and each licensed user agree to the terms of this Agreement and are responsible for the User’s compliance. _________________________________________________________ SUPERVISOR Printed name:____________________________________________ Date:____________________________________________________ CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 14 of 15 04.02.2019 _______________________________________________________ USER NO. 1 Printed name:____________________________________________ Date:____________________________________________________ User’s address:___________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ User’s relationship to Licensee:______________________________ Username: ______________________________________________ User’s password: _________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ USER NO. 2 Printed name:____________________________________________ Date:___________________________________________________ User’s address:__________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ User’s relationship to Licensee:____________________________ Username: ______________________________________________ User’s password: _________________________________________ CODE PUBLISHING SYSTEM 1415 Highway 6 South, Suite D-100 Sugar Land, Texas 77478 enCodePlus Software License (Yorkville, Illinois) Page 15 of 15 04.02.2019 ________________________________________________________ USER NO. 3 Printed name:____________________________________________ Date:___________________________________________________ User’s address:__________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ User’s relationship to Licensee:____________________________ Username: ______________________________________________ User’s password: _________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ USER NO. 4 Printed name:____________________________________________ Date:___________________________________________________ User’s address:__________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ User’s relationship to Licensee:____________________________ Username: ______________________________________________ User’s password: _________________________________________ Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #11 Tracking Number EDC 2019-69 Old Jail Term Sheet Economic Development Committee – August 6, 2019 See attached memo. Bart Olson Administration Name Department Page 1 of 4 Summary Review of a term sheet for sale of the Historical Jail to KCJ Restoration, LLC (McKnight proposal). Background This item was last discussed by the City Council at the July 23rd meeting. At that meeting, the City Council heard a status update from staff that the negotiations for sale of the jail were ongoing. At this time, the majority of the development, sale, and TIF proposals have been agreed upon in concept. The narratives for those proposals are included in the attached term sheet. If the Economic Development Committee is ok with these terms, it is the intent to get a purchase, sale, and TIF agreement ready for the August 13th City Council meeting. While the developer has no hard deadline for purchase and close of the property, the building continues to take on water during weather events, and the proposer is concerned about moisture observed on the floor joists in the historical section. The outline of the term sheet is as follows: Section 1 – Developer name Section 2 – Property boundaries. The exact legal description will be created at a later date, but the sale will not include the parking lot. Staff and the developer will decide upon an agreeable east-west property subdivision between the building and the parking lot to the north. The subdivision of the building from the parking lot may or may not require City Council action, depending on if the lots meet the Plat Act exemptions. The agreed upon purchase price will be the $1,000 as originally proposed by the developer in their first submittal. Section 3 – Right of first refusals, etc. - The City has a right of first refusal on the property, until the project is complete. This protects the City from a scenario where the project is not completed and/or abandoned. Assuming the developer decides to sell the property during that stage, the City would have the option to match the offer and complete the project itself or sell to another developer. - The developer has right of first refusal on the parking lot for the next 20 years. The building site has no available on-site parking, and so the developer is concerned that a successful project and continued success in the downtown on other properties will create a parking shortage. On the off-chance the City thinks the parking lot should be sold in the future, the developer would like the ability to match the offer and own the parking lot themselves. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: July 30, 2019 Subject: Jail sale term sheet Page 2 of 4 - The City will add a deed restriction that the historic, eastern part of the building may never be torn down. The garage portion of the building has no such restriction going forward. This deed restriction could be lifted by mutual agreement between a future landowner and a future City Council. Section 4 – Zoning issues - The property is currently zoned B-1, which does not permit residential apartments on the ground floor. The property will need to be rezoned to R-3 or R-4 immediately following the approval of the agreement, which the City staff would support. However, if the City’s Form Based Code is approved, the code would allow apartments on this property with no further City Council action. - The commercial/historic side of the building is currently proposed to remain as B-1, although the City staff would support a more intense B-zoning district, if needed. The current permitted uses in B-1 will be referenced in this agreement (ex. bakeries, bookstores, coffee shops, community centers, offices, microbrewery/brewpub/microdistillery/microwineries, photography studio, restaurant, retail store, etc.) to protect the developer from future zoning changes. If the City’s Form Based Code is approved, the code would allow more commercial uses such as hotel/motels. Section 5 – Shows the intent of the developer, per their proposal. Section 6 – Shows the intent of the project budget from the developer, per their proposal. The agreement will not contain any commitment to these dollar amounts, other than the cumulative TIF incentives paid out under Section 7 will never be able to exceed the TIF eligible expenses contained within this project budget. Section 7 – Incentives. Finance Director Fredrickson has prepared the attached budget spreadsheet to show the long-term impacts of the incentives on Downtown TIF 2. In general: - The City will pay the developer $30,000 in TIF incentive after the roof has been fixed, and $50,000 after the asbestos and lead-based paint is remediated. This combined $80,000 is the equivalent to the cost of the City tearing down the building. We anticipate both payouts to occur by the end of calendar year 2019. - The City will pay the developer $17,500 in TIF incentive when the residential units in the building are fully complete. This money is coming from the entirety of the TIF 2 budget, and represents the City’s risk in the TIF deal. We anticipate this payout to occur by the end of calendar year 2020. - The City will pay the developer $17,500 in TIF incentive when the commercial units are fully complete (no tenant required). This money is coming from the entirety of the TIF 2 budget, and represents the City’s risk in the TIF deal. We anticipate this payout to occur by the end of 2021. - During the construction of the building and for two years after the building is complete, the City will rebate 100% of all incremental property taxes on the jail property to the developer. We anticipate this payout to occur in FY 22, FY 23, and FY 24. This money will come from the incremental property taxes on the property and not from other funds within the TIF 2 budget, and this money is not guaranteed. For example, if the assessment on the property remains at zero all Page 3 of 4 the way through construction, no property taxes will be paid nor will any property taxes be rebated. - After the 100% construction/post-construction rebates are satisfied above, the City will rebate the following percentages of incremental property taxes for 10 years or until the total payouts under this section reach an actual value of $150,000: o 90% for a period of 4 years and then o 85% for a period of 3 years and then o 80% for a period of 3 years This money will come from the incremental property taxes on the property and not from other funds within the TIF 2 budget, and this money is not guaranteed. For example, if the incremental property taxes on the property only equate to $5,000, the developer would receive 90%/85%/80% of that $5,000. The developer’s estimate is that the property will generate ~$14,000 in property taxes when fully built out. For purposes of the attached budget illustration (referenced above), Rob and I assumed an inflationary growth to those property taxes over the life of the TIF. - For the entire length of any TIF payments to the developer, if there are any students living on the property, the state law requires the City to set aside some of the incremental property taxes for the school district. For the section of TIF incentives referenced immediately above, the TIF incentives would be calculated from the remaining net amount of the incremental property taxes (i.e. after the school district set aside is done). - All of the above is subject to the normal TIF requirement that we can only provide the above TIF payments if the developer has an equivalent or greater amount of TIF eligible expenses. We anticipate that almost all of their entire renovation costs will be TIF eligible under the law. - The City will waive all building permit fees, plan review fees, water meter fees, water connection fees, and sewer connection fees for any part of the property for 5 years, and for the historic part of the property (jail section) for 10 years. These are foregone revenues and will not be reflected as an expenditure anywhere in the budget. - The City will install water, sewer, and residential electric services into the building. The City has employees with the in-house capabilities to complete these projects. The City’s out of pocket hard costs will be approximately $7,500 for the water and sewer service lines and approximately $2,500 for the electrical services. The agreement will be drafted in such a way that the approximate cost for a contractor to complete the work will be referenced in the agreement, such that if the scope of the expected work for all of the services changes, the City and the developer will be able to re-address the City’s participation in the work; in exchange, the value of the water and sewer service at $15,000 and the electrical service at $5,000 will be converted into a TIF incentive (this would require an amendment to the TIF agreement). - The City and the developer will work together to extend the existing nose-in diagonal parking on Madison St, further to the east. Staff thinks that the ADA spot in this area can be reassigned elsewhere, freeing up two parking spaces at minimal cost, and that the parking area could be extended several spots to the east (with County participation). The developer has agreed to pay for the cost of the parking spots to be added, at a cost of $2,000 per space up to a maximum of $10,000 in exchange for lease-use of those new parking spaces. Attorney Orr has opined that a Page 4 of 4 long-term lease of these new parking spaces is possible, but it would require future City Council action. In this scenario, the City would likely be paving the spots with in-house equipment and staff, and the $2,000 cost to the developer will cover the City’s supply / hard-costs of the installation. Section 8 – Parking issues - Sections 8a and 8b dictate that there is ample public parking in the immediate area surrounding the property, and that the parking requirements under the zoning code for the developers most intense possible use under the zoning code are satisfied by the existing public parking. The developer is very concerned that future actions by the City and the County to sell off the public parking will result in adverse actions against the development should they change their business use. Section 8B(iv) clarifies that no further parking requirements will be placed against the property unless the property is rezoned by the developer. Recommendation Staff requests feedback on the above terms and recommends approval of an agreement in accordance with the term sheet. Pending positive feedback from the committee, we are optimistic that a final agreement could be ready for City Council consideration on August 13th. TERM SHEET United City of Yorkville 111 West Madison Street Old Kendall County Jail 1. Developer: Peter McKnight and Cary Coles, a Limited Liability Company of Illinois to be incorporated for this project 659 North Carpenter Chicago, Illinois 60642 2. Property: 111 West Madison Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560, exclusive of the parking lot. Legal Description: Lots 1 and 2 in Block 28 except any part taken for the people of the State of Illinois, of the original Village of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Purchase Price: $1,000.00 3. Property Encumbrances: A. The Deed of conveyance to the Developer shall be subject to the Right of First Refusal in favor of the City in the event of any subsequent conveyance, sale, transfer, gift or exchange of the Property by the Developer until final completion of the project and the City has issued certificates of occupancy for the residential units and the commercial area. B. The City shall grant the Developer the Right of First Refusal in the event of the conveyance, sale, transfer, gift or exchange of Lots 3 and 4 of Block 28 (the parking lot) for a term of twenty (20) years. C. The Deed of conveyance shall be subject to a covenant running with the land that the historic portion (i.e. jail, not the garage) of the building may never demolished by any private owner, without consent of the City Council. 4. Proposed Project. Development of a Mixed-Use Property 2 Options include the following:  Five (5) residential Beautiful Modern Market Rate Units (in two-story structure/old garage building) o The property is located within the B-1 zoning district. The current zoning ordinance does allow multi-family residential as a permitted use, however only above the first floor in a building and no more than two (2) units. A rezoning of the parcel to an R-3 or R-4 zoning designation would be required for apartment style residential use on both lower and upper floors. o The proposed Yorkville Form-Based Code (FBC) permits all residential dwellings as a permitted use under the “B Street” District. If the FBC is approved, no additional City Council approvals for apartment style dwellings are required.  Plus 2,000 square foot (of finished) Commercial Space (up to 4,240 square foot) Hospitality/Retail/Office space o The property is located within the B-1 zoning district. The current zoning ordinance does allow for mixed use developments with commercial and/or office.  The current permitted uses under zoning code and district are as listed on Exhibit A attached hereto. 5. Project Vision Our plan is to work with the state, county and city government stakeholders as well as the local community and not for profits to repair, remediate, restore the Kendall County Jail site to an income producing property while adhering to the preservation and retention of the relevant historic elements of the building. 6. Project Budget Pre-Construction/Emergency (1st Phase) Immediate Protection of Roof (tarping) $ 7,410 Site Protection (grounds/building) (cameras/alarms/safety) $ 1,800 Erect Construction fencing & baracades $ 3,500 Portable site sanitation (rental) $ 2,400 Sub-Total $15,110 Environmental Remediation (1st Phase) Asbestos $30,000 Lead Based Paint $16,400 Sub-Total $46,400 3 EXTERIOR PHASE Miscellaneous Exterior Demolition (general & interiors) $ 18,000 Sallyport Demo (1st Phase) $ 15,000 New Roof (1st Phase) $ 30,000 Fascia, Downspouts, Misc. $ 8,000 Masonry Repairs $ 54,319 New Windows $ 40,000 Exterior Doors $ 11,000 Exterior Concrete Work $ 16,000 Misc. Structural Repairs $ 5,500 Landscaping $ 6,000 Sub-Total $203,810 INTERIOR PHASE Mechanical Phase Electrical Service Updates $ 30,000 Commercial Space Electrical $ 15,000 HVAC (residential portion) $ 30,000 HVAC (commercial space) $ 25,000 Sub-Total $100,000 Plumbing Residential $35,000 Commercial $30,000 New H20 Service $10,000 Sub-Total $75,000 Interior Finish Phase Rough Carpentry $ 10,000 Finish Carpentry $ 10,000 Finish Plumbing $ 10,000 Finish Electrical $ 4,000 Flooring $ 30,000 Drywall $ 50,000 Plaster Restoration $ 8,000 4 Historic wood work restoration (historic porches) $ 16,000 Insulation $ 10,000 Paint $ 7,000 Appliances (Fridge/range/mwave-hood/DW/WD) $ 12,500 Lighting $ 6,000 Sub-Total $173,500 Miscellaneous Porches (new-in residential section) $30,000 Contingency $40,000 Sub-Total $70,000 Fees and Soft Costs General Contractors Fees $ 49,425 General Conditions $ 15,000 Insurance (during construction phase) $ 8,000 Utilities (during construction phase) $ 2,200 Architectural fees $ 35,000 Engineering fees $ 5,000 Permit fee $ 3,000 Loan fees (bank) $ 5,000 Interest Carry (construction period) $ 21,000 Legal Fees $ 15,000 Sub-Total $158,625 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION BUDGET $842,445 7. TIF Assistance A. City will pay developer $30,000 in TIF incentive after: i. Completion of new roof installation in accordance with applicable code requirements on or before December 1, 2019 or 90 days after permit issuance, whichever comes later. ii. Payment shall be made within 30 days of satisfaction of (i) above. AND B. City will pay developer the lesser of: (i) the cost of abatement of asbestos materials and remediation of lead-based paint; or, (ii) $50,000 in TIF incentive after 5 abatement of asbestos materials and remediation of lead-based paint has been completed in accordance with all applicable building codes. AND C. City will pay developer $17,500 in TIF incentive upon issuance of certificates of occupancy for all of the residential units in the building. AND D. City will pay developer $17,500 in TIF incentive after completion of the construction of all of the commercial space in the building in accordance with all applicable building codes (no certificate of occupancy required until tenant is prepared to occupy). AND E. The City shall rebate 100% of all incremental property taxes on the building: i. During the construction of the building; AND ii. For two tax years after completion of the building permit; AND iii. Subject to there being no property maintenance or building code violations on the property; AND iv. Subject to there being no registered students living on the property, it being understood that if there are students, the amount required to be set aside for the school district distribution shall be taken out of the entire property tax bill, and the TIF rebate shall be 100% of the remaining net amount. AND F. After item E is completed, the City shall rebate the following percentages of incremental property taxes on the building: i. 90% for a period of 4 years AND THEN ii. 85% for a period of 3 years AND THEN iii. 80% for a period of 3 years OR iv. Whenever these item F payouts reach an actual value of $150,000 (i.e. whichever happens first) v. Subject to there being no registered students living on the property it being understood that if there are students, the amount required to be set aside for the school district distribution shall be taken out of the entire property tax bill, and the TIF rebates shall be 90/85/80% of the remaining net amount AND 6 G. All of the above is subject to verification that all payouts to the developers are never cumulatively greater than the amount of TIF eligible expenditures on the property. AND H. The City will waive all building permit fees (including plan review fees), water meter fees, water connection fees, and sewer connection fees for any projects on any portion of the building commenced within 5 years from the date of approval of the agreement, and for any projects on the historic (eastern half) of the building commenced within 10 years from the date of approval of the agreement. I. The City will complete the water and sewer service line extensions into the building i. As of July 2019, this is contemplated at two 1” water service lines and a 6” sanitary service line, and a maximum construction cost estimate of $15,000. J. The City will construct five residential service electrical services into the building i. As of July 2019, this is contemplated at a maximum construction cost estimate of $5,000. K. The City will utilize its best efforts to extend the nose-in diagonal on-street parking adjacent to the property, to the east of the current parking spots to a point yet to be determined near the property line shared with Kendall County, or onto the Kendall County property or adjacent public right-of-way. For each additional parking spot created, the developer’s TIF incentive shall be reduced by $2,000, up to a maximum of $10,000, to be deducted from the payouts as contemplated in Section 7E above. Parking spots for which the developer’s TIF incentive is reduced may be leased for the term of the final redevelopment agreement but only if three-fourths (3/4) of the City Council approve such lease. 8. Outstanding Issue, Parking: A. Parking lot to the north (i) Seventeen (17) off-street public parking spaces are currently located north of the existing structure (parking area will be subdivided as a separate parcel upon sale), plus an additional (3) on-street public parking spaces to the south (Madison Street) are immediately available to property. An additional seven (7) striped on-street public parking stalls northeast of the property on W. Van Emmon Street are available, as well as a County- owned off-street public parking lot east of the property on W. Madison Street holding approximately thirteen (13) stalls are available. Total available public parking stalls within 200 feet are forty (40) stalls. 7 (ii) Minimum required parking spaces for the commercial and office uses is three (3) spaces per 1,000 of floor area; one (1) space per lodging unit for the hotel/hospitality use; and two (2) spaces per dwelling unit. B. Parking requirements for proposed use under current zoning codes i. Based upon the proposal, under the current zoning ordinance an estimated maximum twenty-three (23) parking stalls (ten (10) stalls for residential and thirteen (13) for all non-residential uses) would be required. ii. Per the City’s Zoning Ordinance, all required parking spaces are to be located within 1,000 feet of the use served, with the exception for residential or hotel use which should be within 300 feet. iii. The adjacent off-street parking lot to the north of the building can be utilized to fulfil the site’s residential parking needs (ten (10) spaces). The non-residential parking needs can be fulfilled by the other identified off- street and on-street parking areas within 200 feet of the property. iv. The maximum member of parking slots as stated in (i) above, shall not be increased for so long as the property retains its current zoning. If the property is rezoned at any time, the parking requirements under the zoning code as then in effect shall apply. 9. Term of Redevelopment Agreement. a. December 31, 2041. 8 Exhibit A Permitted Uses in B-1 Zone  Multi-family dwelling above first for business or live work space with maximum of two apartments  College, junior college  Library  Religious institution  Advertising Agency  Antique Sales  Bakery  Bank  Beauty/Barber Shop  Bookkeeping Services  Boat Sales  Bookstore  Clothes-Pressing and Repair  Private Club  Coffee Shop  Commercial Laboratory  Trade school  Detective Agency  Dressmaker  Dry Cleaning  Employment Office  Funeral Home  Grocery Store  Liquor Store  Massage Establishment  Medical Clinic  Microbrewery  Pawnbrokers  Photography  Post Office  Professional Services  Radio and Television Studio  Recreation Center  Resale Dealers  Restaurant  Retail Store  Shoe Repair  Tattoo Establishment  Treatment Center UnauditedFY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedRevenue Taxes - 24,597 25,000 33,000 33,000 39,000 39,560 40,142 40,748 41,738 42,033 42,714 43,423 44,160 44,926 45,723 Total Revenue - 24,597 25,000 33,000 33,000 39,000 39,560 40,142 40,748 41,738 42,033 42,714 43,423 44,160 44,926 45,723 ExpendituresContractual Services 2,575 85,000 22,500 30,500 13,000 19,000 18,104 18,628 19,173 19,740 19,478 20,057 20,660 20,328 20,941 21,579 Capital Outlay - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures 2,575 85,000 22,500 30,500 13,000 19,000 18,104 18,628 19,173 19,740 19,478 20,057 20,660 20,328 20,941 21,579 Surplus (Deficit) (2,575) (60,403) 2,500 2,500 20,000 20,000 21,456 21,514 21,575 21,998 22,555 22,657 22,763 23,832 23,985 24,144 Ending Fund Balance (2,575) (62,978) (60,478) (57,978) (37,978) (17,978) 3,478 24,992 46,567 68,565 91,120 113,777 136,540 160,372 184,357 208,501 Downtown TIF Fund II (89)The Downtown TIF II was created in 2018, in order to help promote downtown redevelopment and support the existing Downtown TIF. ($100)$0$100$200$300ThousandsFund Balance UnauditedFY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034Account Number Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected ProjectedDowntown TIF II89-000-40-00-4000 PROPERTY TAXES - 24,597 25,000 33,000 33,000 39,000 39,560 40,142 40,748 41,738 42,033 42,714 43,423 44,160 44,926 45,723 Revenue - 24,597 25,000 33,000 33,000 39,000 39,560 40,142 40,748 41,738 42,033 42,714 43,423 44,160 44,926 45,723 89-890-54-00-5401 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGEBACK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 89-890-54-00-5425 TIF INCENTIVE PAYOUT - 80,000 17,500 25,500 8,000 14,000 13,104 13,628 14,173 14,740 14,478 15,057 15,660 15,328 15,941 16,579 89-890-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,575 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 89-890-54-00-5470 FACADE REHAB PROGRAM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 89-890-60-00-6000 PROJECT COSTS- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Expenditures 2,575 85,000 22,500 30,500 13,000 19,000 18,104 18,628 19,173 19,740 19,478 20,057 20,660 20,328 20,941 21,579 Surplus(Deficit) (2,575) (60,403) 2,500 2,500 20,000 20,000 21,456 21,514 21,575 21,998 22,555 22,657 22,763 23,832 23,985 24,144 Fund Balance (2,575) (62,978) (60,478) (57,978) (37,978) (17,978) 3,478 24,992 46,567 68,565 91,120 113,777 136,540 160,372 184,357 208,501 Description Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Old Business #1 Tracking Number EDC 2019-23 Downtown Form Based Code and Master Streetscape Plan Economic Development Committee – August 6, 2019 Additional Revisions per Committee Vote Feedback Proposed alternative catenary lighting for the downtown overlay district as presented in the Streetscape Masterplan and Form-Based Code documents. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department 7-2-19 SUMMARY: Review and discussion of the proposed alternative overhead catenary lighting in the downtown as part of the Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Plan consisting of a Streetscape Master Plan and Form-Based Code. BACKGROUND: As you may recall, the final draft of the Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Plan was presented at the May 14, 2019 City Council meeting for its first reading prior to adoption. A presentation of the highlights of the Streetscape Master Plan and the Form-Based Code for the overlay district was given at that meeting by the consultant, Doug Farr of Farr & Associates. The plans are intended to establish the broader guidance for street character and development opportunities within the downtown which can be facilitated through public capital improvement projects and private redevelopment. Over the course of 18-months, beginning in January 2018, the consultant and staff hosted a project website; conducted two (2) public workshops; previewed a draft plan at a committee meeting; held a public open house; and had a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission; all to gather input and solicit feedback on the various drafts of the plan. All feedback received during this time was incorporated into the plan. A formal recommendation for adoption was made by the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 10, 2019. At the June 4, 2019 Economic Development Committee meeting, staff received comments regarding certain aspects of the Streetscape Masterplan, specifically the curb treatment for ‘B” Street Residential areas and the proposed overhead catenary lighting on Van Emmon Street. The curb treatment and subsequent edits recommended by Alderman Funkhouser were addressed by staff at the July 2nd meeting. Staff is now addressing the direction given to explore alternative light fixture options to the catenary overhead lights on Van Emmon Street and bring back to the committee for further discussion. ORIGINALLY PROPOSED PLAN: In the originally proposed Streetscape Master Plan, overhead catenary lighting was recommended on Van Emmon Street (east and west) as a gateway and atmospheric feature within the downtown, as illustrated on the following page: Memorandum To: Economic Development Department From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Jason Engberg, Senior Planner Date: July 16, 2019 Subject: Downtown Form Based Code and Streetscape Master Plan Alternative Catenary Lighting 2 Purpose/Benefit The introduction of lighting in any streetscape design is to define the public space. In large open public spaces such as Van Emmon Street, lighting from a suspended catenary system can create a passive transition between environments while visually identifying an intended place for gathering. The ambiance created by the cascading light “roof” maximizes the usable footprint of a public area for pedestrians beyond the sidewalk and heightens the awareness of drivers in this shared space. The increased illumination encourages night time usage of the downtown and adds another layer of security. 3 Design/Location As proposed, the catenary system would have a linear grid light pattern attached to decorative poles suspended between 20 feet to 24 feet above Van Emmon Street and supported with concrete foundations. The lights, individual styled “Edison bulbs”, would extend mid-block on either side of East and West Van Emmon but will not be located within the IL Route 47 (S Bridge Street) right-of-way. The following images depict the originally proposed lighting system with views on both sides of Van Emmon Street: 4 Survey Results As part of the public outreach conducted by the consultant in preparing the Yorkville Downtown Overlay District’s Streetscape Master Plan, a web survey was implemented to garner feedback from citizens on design elements for the downtown. The survey was taken by nearly 500 respondents. When specifically asked “Which is a preferred gateway element into downtown?”, approximately 40% responded that overhead lights should be utilized. 5 PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES: During the June and July EDC discussions regarding the overhead lights, staff received mixed commentary and questions on if the catenary lights should be kept in the plan, the cost and future maintenance and we were also provided an alternative light fixture option by Alderman Funkhouser. Staff was further tasked with providing the committee with three (3) alternative light fixture options for formal consideration. Below are four (4) alternative light fixtures proposed as alternatives to the “Edison Bulb” style depicted in the original proposal: #1 Single Cable Pendant-Style Lights • Simplest and most cost efficient with regards to number of light standards needed. • Recommended for short distances and typically used in alley ways or suspended between buildings or poles where a discrete or delicate lighting effect is desired. #2 Random Central Ring Globe Lights 6 • Ideal for large open areas where connections may be spaced irregularly between buildings and possibly poles. • Depending on the spacing and number of light standards, the random positioning of the lighting can create a celestial or a luminous canopy effect. #3 Linear Grid Bell-Shade Lights • The uniformed and geometric net-like system can be used for both small and large spaces which provides greater flexibility when incorporating temporary or seasonal decorations. • The lighting effect provides the most coverage and the structural form of the net creates a transparent “ceiling” informally defining the space. #4 Central Spine Singular Dome Lights 7 • Utilizes one principal lighting or architectural element to form an elegant appearance. • Lighting effect is pinpoint, offering a “halo” glow at regular intervals. COST & MAINTENANCE: The city’s engineering consultant, Engineering Enterprises Inc. (EEI), provided a preliminary estimate of the costs to design and install the catenary lighting system. Per the originally proposed design, the total preliminary estimated cost for engineering and installation on both East and West Van Emmon Street would be approximately $240,000. Below is a detail of those early estimates: DOWNTOWN CATENARY LIGHTING - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES WEST VAN EMMON EAST VAN EMMON Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount Decorative Poles EA 10 $3,000 $30,000 Decorative Poles EA 12 $3,000 $36,000 Lighting Cable & Fixtures FT 1,200 $25 $30,000 Lighting Cable & Fixtures FT 1,450 $25 $36,250 Concrete Foundations FT 70 $250 $17,500 Concrete Foundations FT 84 $250 $21,000 Electrical Service EA 1 $5,000 $5,000 Electrical Service EA 1 $5,000 $5,000 Subtotal $82,500 Subtotal $98,250 Contingency (15%) $12,400 Contingency (15%) $14,800 Total $94,900 Total $113,050 Engineering (15%) $14,300 Engineering (15%) $17,000 TOTAL PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE $109,200 TOTAL PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE $130,050 The highest percentage of costs associated with the catenary light system are the decorative poles and length of lighting cable and fixtures. These estimates can be adjusted to use less expensive or fewer number of poles in addition to shortening the run of cable or limiting the number of fixtures. With regard to future maintenance of the catenary lights, according to architectural and structural engineers who design and install such systems, they should require very little upkeep as long as careful consideration of access to the power supply in the design stage is taken. Additionally, maintenance may also include the seasonal and themed decoration changes and the washing and replacement of light fixtures. 8 STAFF COMMENTS/REQUESTED DIRECTION: Staff believes the information provided in this memo outlines the comments and feedback received at the June and July Economic Development Committee meetings regarding the proposed catenary lights. Therefore, we are seeking firm direction and consensus from the committee regarding the following: 1. To keep or remove the overhead catenary lighting feature from the Streetscape Master Plan. 2. If to keep, specific catenary lighting fixture preference. We welcome any additional feedback you may have on the information provided and will be available to answer any questions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Revised Yorkville Streetscape Master Plan 2. Draft Revised Yorkville Downtown Form-Based Code Streetscape Master Plan YORKVILLE Downtown Overlay District Yorkville, Illinois Downtown Yorkville 3Table of Contents Appendix Bridge Street Introduction Streetscape Master Plan Hydraulic Street Van Emmon Street ‘B’ Street p. 52 p. 10 p. 18 p. 34 p. 06 p. 26 p. 04 Table of Contents United City of Yorkville Farr Associates Former Mayor Gary J. Golinski Bart Olson, City Administrator Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Jason Engberg, Senior Planner Eric Dhuse, Public Works Director Lisa Pickering, City Clerk Richard T. Hart, Chief of Police Tim Evans, Director of Parks and Recreation Brad Sanderson, EEI, Engineering Consultant Acknowledgements City Council Mayor John Purcell Joel Frieders, Alderman Chris Funkhouser, Alderman Ken Koch, Alderman Jacquelyn Milschewski, Alderman Jason Peterson, Alderman Arden Joe Plocher, Alderman Seaver Tarulis, Alderman Daniel Transier, Alderman Planning and Zoning Commissioners Randy Harker, Chairman Reagan Goins, Commissioner Debra Horaz, Commissioner Don Marcum, Commissioner Jeff Olson, Commissioner Richard Vinyard, Commissioner Daniel Williams, Commissioner 4 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District A streetscape master plan provides guidance for the direction and character of future street related capital improvement projects. As downtown Yorkville continues to evolve, so too should its streets and public spaces to support the changing land uses over time. Downtown has experienced multiple moments of transition over the years, but recently, downtown has experienced a renaissance of sorts with desirable new restaurants and small local businesses occupying existing structures. An improved Fox River-oriented park and other recreational amenities add another layer to downtown’s assets. Introduction At its heart, Yorkville is a small-town on a sleepy river with residents committed to improving the quality of the city for all. What better place to start than improving a downtown that should be the center of the community, where events, festivals, and family gatherings take place regularly. The streets of downtown Yorkville should be the armature that supports these functions and helps contribute to building community and quality of life. Streetscape Master Plan 5 Downtown Overlay District Streetscape Master Plan Hydraulic Street Street Type Classification Bridge Street Van Emmon Street ‘B’ Street Wayfinding and Signage General Streetscape Guidance p. 16 p. 24 p. 40 p. 42 p. 10 p. 32 p. 08 6 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Streetscape Master Plan Because downtown Yorkville needs one. Investors and property owners interested in improving their downtown assets may think twice if they do not sense a commitment from the City. The downtown TIF I was certainly an effort to encourage redevelopment within downtown and TIF II is an added incentive for owners to invest; however, the lack of an inspiring plan that presents future capital improvement priorities for the City leaves much to be desired. This streetscape master plan is intended to get people excited about the potential of downtown. Knowing that improvements are in the pipeline, investors can get out in front and establish a presence prior to downtown realizing its full potential. A streetscape master plan’s focus is on the public realm - most notably the streets, furnishing zones, and sidewalks. It helps to establish what role each street will play moving forward. For example, it establishes which streets are ‘A’ Streets; meaning a street that should be accompanied by building frontages, glazing, signage, and activity. They are the Why a Streetscape Master Plan? streets that residents come to downtown to stroll along and enjoy a sunny Saturday afternoon. Alternatively, a ‘B’ Street supports the ‘A’ Street. Parking access, sides of buildings, and service oriented functions should be accessed off ‘B’ Streets. Like ‘A’ Streets, they are critical to the functioning successes of places we love. Accommodating both within downtown, while defining which is which, can help property owners prioritize where their future front entry is located or where that new café tenant should face. Downtown was identified as a primary concern in the 2016 Yorkville Comprehensive Plan for good reason. Despite its current downfalls, downtown contains exciting assets to build upon. Restaurants, old buildings packed with potential, plenty of infill and redevelopment opportunities, and a fantastic recreational amenity in the Fox River, all bode well for the future of downtown. This plan demonstrates some of the strategies the City can implement to pave the way for the future of downtown. Figure 1 - Bridge Street (Farr Associates) Streetscape Master Plan 7 The streetscape master plan is structured to complement the Downtown Yorkville Form-Based Code. Form-based codes (FBC) are land development regulations that seek to produce predictable built results that prioritize building form over building use as a distinguishing factor. Often times, a regulatory zone or framework is applied at the block level, much like zoning, where parcels fall into a specific FBC classification. The Downtown Yorkville Form-Based Code uses the street types as a regulatory framework. The parcels that front a specific street type identified in this plan use that street type as the underlying FBC classification. If a parcel fronts more than one street, the FBC articulates the process of discerning which FBC zone takes precedent. The FBC includes further instruction on how to identify a parcel, determine the underlying regulatory zone, and easily interpret the zone’s requirements for redevelopment. The streetscape master plan brings a visual interpretation of what form and character future capital improvements will exhibit. Though the streetscape master plan and the FBC are intended to be stand-alone documents, they are coordinated efforts that provide layers of detail to collectively envision the future of downtown Yorkville. The series of diagrams on the right is from the Form-Based Codes Institute (FBCI) and meant to visualize the physical consequences that stem from conventional zoning (top), conventional zoning with supporting design guidelines (middle), and form-based codes (right). Standards that prioritize form over use have the capabilities of encouraging a more fine-grained outcome. Conventional Zoning (FBCI) Zoning Design Guidelines (FBCI) Form-Based Codes (FBCI) Providing Framework for the FBC 8 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District The following street types represent what will be the guiding framework for the form-based code (FBC) parcel classifications. Parcels fronting their respective street type should follow the form-based guidelines outlined in the Downtown Yorkville Form-Based Code. The different street types are • 'A' Streets • Bridge Street • Hydraulic Street • Van Emmon • 'B' Streets Street Type Classification Street Type Classification Figure 3 - Hydraulic Street (Google Maps)Figure 2 - Bridge Street (Google Maps) Figure 5 - Main Street (Google Maps)Figure 4 - Van Emmon Street (Google Maps) These street types are represented on the following pages with the existing condition, proposed near-term improvements, and proposed long-term vision. The street types are represented at typical segments along key stretches; therefore, minor variations will occur where applicable. This Streetscape Master Plan is intended to envision the character and role each street contributes to the future of downtown Yorkville and does not represent finalized landscape and construction details. Street Type Classification 0’75’150’300’ F o x R i v e r S Bridge StreetN Bridge StreetE Fox Street W Ridge Street W Madison Street E Van Emmon Street E Hydraulic Street Mill StreetS Main StreetState StreetHeustis StreetKey Bridge Street Hydraulic Street Van Emmon Street ‘B’ Street ‘B’ Street - Residential Streetscape Master Plan 9 10 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Bridge Street, between Hydraulic Street to the north and Van Emmon Street to the south, was clearly the historic downtown core of Yorkville. Though this stretch is only one block long, it retains much of the scale and character of the past. Bridge Street was historically a two travel-lane street with parallel parking on either side to serve the businesses. Traffic became congested, since Bridge Street (IL 47) is the main truck route through Yorkville. The Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) studied widening the street along with other improvements to alleviate the congestion. Many years after the initial plan of a five-lane Bridge Street, the proposal was finally taken to construction. Yorkville residents were anxious to speed up flow through a downtown long removed from representing the heart of the community. Since the IDOT improvements, the commercial viability of the businesses were challenged. Travel lanes replaced parallel parking and concrete barriers were placed between street and sidewalk. The combination of road widening, increased speed, lack of parallel parking, and other factors drove many of the primary building entries around to the backs of the Bridge Street buildings. The increased speeds and lack of pedestrian traffic along Bridge Street have effectively drained downtown of any potential for vitality. Residents have mixed opinions about the impacts of IDOT’s improvements; however, it is clear that the term “improvements” may not be the correct expression for Bridge Street’s new character. This stretch of Bridge Street may be considered the gateway into downtown Yorkville and retains potential to become the iconic stretch that helps draw people into local businesses and displays an attractive image that represents the people of Yorkville. Figure 6 - Bridge Street Facades (Farr Associates) Figure 7 - Bridge Street Blank Wall (Farr Associates) Figure 8 - Bridge Street Sidewalk/Barrier (Farr Associates) IDOT’s Improvements Bridge Street (Existing) D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE 10’ 12’12’ 10’ 12’ 8’8’5’5’12’ 13’13’ 6’6’ 12’ 4’ 4’4’13’13’ 2’2’11’11’ 14’12’ 12’18’ 12’ 12’8’8’ 8’ 23’23’4’4’6’ 6’ 6’ 6’4’22’16’2’12’8’8’ 6’10’10’Varies 6’ 72’ 72’60’ 50’ - 60’ 50’ - 60’ 60’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ Slip Lane Streetscape Master Plan 11 Bridge Street (Existing) 12 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Figure 9 - Wall Mural (Philly Magazine) Figure 5 - Outdoor Restaurant Seating (Pictures Boss) Bridge Street (Near-Term) Meaningful measures to display an image of vitality and interest can be taken with a cost sensitive approach. For example, instead of temporarily narrowing traffic lanes or tearing down the now important concrete barriers flanking Bridge Street; beautification strategies might include painting the concrete barriers and hand rails with a custom design or painting large iconic murals on the blank downtown building walls. Each of these interventions could contribute to the overall character of downtown and play a dual role of encouraging vehicular and pedestrian traffic to be cautious and slow down. Because this segment of Bridge Street is such an important gateway for the City, concentrating multiple interventions on this location within the greater downtown should take priority over other streets and locations. Drivers would recognize that downtown could be worth visiting. The larger scale of these proposed interventions caters to the car, because it is in this brief moment that downtown has to attract the attention of passersby. Painted Crosswalks Paving Texture or Material Change Public Art/Sculpture Painted Light Poles Outdoor Restaurant Seating Entry Landscape Improvements Seasonal Banners Painted Bridge Street Barrier/Railing Yorkville Entry Wall Mural Tactical Interventions 1 2 3 4 6 5 7 9 8 9 5 Y O R K V I L L E W E L C O M E T O D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE Streetscape Master Plan 13 Figure 11 - Painted Concrete Barrier (NYC Parks)Figure 12 - Public Art / Sculpture (Designboom) 38 1 2 3 4 56 7 8 9 Bridge Street (Near-Term) 14 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District The existing Bridge Street right-of-way affords very little flexibility for major improvements; however, that does not preclude meaningful upgrades from happening. Squeezing in improvements where possible, such as: the addition of seasonal banners to the light poles; repaving the sidewalks with high-quality and interesting materials for pedestrians; or replacing the damaged handrail with a feature handrail that may be an art installation; can make a surprisingly dramatic impact for both drivers and pedestrians. Additionally, if the buildings better engage the sidewalks through accessible entrances, signage, and outdoor seating options, this would improve this highly visible stretch of downtown Yorkville. A reduction in lane width on Bridge street, which would require a reclassification from IDOT to remove its truck route status, is not currently an option. Therefore, a five-lane street will likely be the long-term reality. It will be critical for the City to address the perception issues with Bridge Street through near-term solutions that may last many years. Near-term strategies can add value to downtown Yorkville through amplified crosswalks, branding and wayfinding elements, visible outdoor seating, and much more. Figure 13 - Improved, Feature Handrail (Hype Science) Figure 14 - Seasonal Banners (Farr Associates) Figure 15 - Improved Sidewalk Pavement (California DOT) Minor Upgrades Go a Long Way Bridge Street (Long-Term) Y O R K V I L L E W E L C O M E T O D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLED O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE 10’ 12’12’ 10’ 12’ 8’8’5’5’12’ 13’13’ 6’6’ 12’ 4’ 4’4’13’13’ 2’2’11’11’ 14’12’ 12’18’ 12’ 12’8’8’ 8’ 23’23’4’4’6’ 6’ 6’ 6’4’22’16’2’12’8’8’ 6’10’10’Varies 6’ 72’ 72’60’ 50’ - 60’ 50’ - 60’ 60’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ Streetscape Master Plan 15 Bridge Street (Long-Term) Outdoor Seating Emphasized Crosswalks Landscape Buffer Improved Intersection Yorkville MuralRestriped Parking 5-Lane Streetscape Paving Improvements 16 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Hydraulic Street includes complex conditions, such as utility poles landing in the street; a tapering right-of-way that narrows from west to east; and an active freight rail line that runs parallel to the street surface within the right-of-way. Because it runs parallel to the Fox River, there are multiple access and view corridors that connect pedestrians on Hydraulic Street to one of Yorkville’s most important assets. The freight rail line tracks are immediately adjacent to the southern edge of the street. This proximity could be a safety issue; however, during the citizen engagement events, residents did not voice much concern over the rail, except the noise complaints and potential for trains to back up traffic along Bridge Street. Though only one rail company utilizes the line, it is important to the natural gas industry because it accesses select sand used for the fracking process. Any expectations of the rail line closure are unrealistic, at least in the near-term. The active rail line will remain something that any redesign plans, current or future, must address. Hydraulic Street features a unique industrial character as a result of the rail and adjacent buildings and uses. The short, utilitarian buildings, as well as agricultural relics, such as the grain elevator, create an eclectic mix of land uses and character. Multiple popular businesses and parks exist along Hydraulic Street, and the existing character seems to support these types of businesses. As improvements occur to make Hydraulic Street a more attractive, safe, and usable street, a respect for its industrial past and present should be retained. Figure 16 - Hydraulic Street (Farr Associates) Figure 17 - Hydraulic Street (Farr Associates) Figure 18 - Inactive Grain Elevator (Farr Associates) Unique Industrial Character Hydraulic Street (Existing) Hydraulic Street (Existing) D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE 10’ 12’12’ 10’ 12’ 8’8’5’5’12’ 13’13’ 6’6’ 12’ 4’ 4’4’13’13’ 2’2’11’11’ 14’12’ 12’18’ 12’ 12’8’8’ 8’ 23’23’4’4’6’ 6’ 6’ 6’4’22’16’2’12’8’8’ 6’10’10’Varies 6’ 72’ 72’60’ 50’ - 60’ 50’ - 60’ 60’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ Slip Lane Streetscape Master Plan 17 18 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Hydraulic Street character will remain unique and interesting with or without planning interventions. The low traffic counts and limited number of businesses that currently front onto Hydraulic Street suggest that a lower level of resources should be placed in its near-term improvements. However, a few key improvements that help support the current businesses should be prioritized. This could include allowing outdoor seating areas either in the parking lots or at the edge of the street and sidewalks; painting the existing light poles with unique artwork; adding seasonal banners to the existing light poles; and improving the rear facade of Bridge Street, as this has effectively become the primary entry to many of those businesses. The rear facade of the Bridge Street buildings is highly visible since no structures currently exist to obscure mid-block views. Additionally, moveable planters with trees and other vegetation could bring life, shade, and color to an otherwise utilitarian Hydraulic Street. Painted Light Poles Seasonal Banners Outdoor Restaurant Seating Temporary Tree Planters Painted Crosswalks Maintain Gravel Between Tracks Bridge Street Rear Facade Improvements Street Surface Lane Striping Figure 19 - Painted Light Pole (Tops Images) Figure 20 - Well Maintained Gravel Surface (Dare Inc.) Tactical Interventions Hydraulic Street (Near-Term) 1 1 2 3 64 6 5 7 8 D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE DO W N T O W N YORKVILLESIGNAGE Streetscape Master Plan 19 Figure21 - Rear Facade Lighting and Signage (House St. Clair)Figure22 - Outdoor Restaurant Seating (South Milwaukee) Hydraulic Street (Near-Term) 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 37 20 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District The unique qualities of Hydraulic Street with its irregular street section, limited traffic count, paralleling of the Fox River, and already funky, casual character lends itself well to becoming a woonerf, or “shared street”. This long-term vision would allow Hydraulic Street to be closed down for festivals or events between the current driveway aligning with the rear entrances of the Bridge Street buildings and Heustis or Mill Street. Circulation around the block would still be possible through the use of a “slip lane” or access lane that would run along the south edge of the railroad tracks in order to access future redevelopment on those parcels. Hydraulic Street could take on a unique design such as permeable pavers to add character and stormwater management benefits. Being adjacent to the Fox River, an effort to minimize stormwater runoff and encourage percolation would be an environmentally conscious solution. Continuous pavers spanning between vehicular travel areas and traditional pedestrian areas would effectively blur the line between pedestrian and car right-of-way. This would encourage slow moving traffic on non-event days when Hydraulic Street is open, and add an attractive frontage for the businesses along Hydraulic Street. A shared street deserves a custom design. When City budget is allocated towards Hydraulic Street capital improvements, an emphasis should be placed on hiring highly-qualified landscape architects experienced in right-of-way redesign. Figure 23 - Chicane Plantings (NACTO) Figure 24 - Funky Outdoor Seating (Asik Site) Figure 25 - Shared Street (Ithaca College) Conversion to a Shared Street Hydraulic Street (Long-Term) S I G NAGE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE 10’ 12’12’ 10’ 12’ 8’8’5’5’12’ 13’13’ 6’6’ 12’ 4’ 4’4’13’13’ 2’2’11’11’ 14’12’ 12’18’ 12’ 12’8’8’ 8’ 23’23’4’4’6’ 6’ 6’ 6’4’22’16’2’12’8’8’ 6’10’10’Varies 6’ 72’ 72’60’ 50’ - 60’ 50’ - 60’ 60’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ Slip Lane Streetscape Master Plan 21 Outdoor Seating Shared Street Landscape Frontage Visitor Parking Slip Lane Mixed-use Redevelopment Fox River Hydraulic Street (Long-Term) D O W N T O W N YORK V I L L E 22 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District As previously mentioned, a shared street should blur the lines between vehicle and pedestrian zones. Subtle changes to paving materials and the use of planters, street furnishings, and markings can define where cars should or should not drive. Since Hydraulic Street runs parallel with the Fox River, a street section that sheet flows stormwater into a continuous drainage channel within paving change is an example of integrated street design. These site design details are important, as this will become a major downtown event location. Hydraulic Street Shared Street Paving Texture or Material Change Chicane Planting Beds Maintain Existing Distance from Tracks Raised Planting Beds Planter Seating Ledge Continuous Drainage Channel on One Side 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 Figure 26 - Hydraulic Street Diagram (Farr Associates) Streetscape Master Plan 23 Figure 27 - Paving Texture Change (Site Design Group) Figure 28 - Raised Intersection (NACTO) Figure 29 - Planter Seating Ledge (Transform KC) Subtle paving details, such as a change in material, texture, or orientation, contribute interest to the pedestrian environment. Minor variations can help make a design unique to a specific location and help brand the place. Paving details may be used to delineate where vehicles are allowed to drive or park. These variations may help inform the location of custom street furniture, emphasize locations for tree plantings and signage locations, or simply add aesthetic appeal. Shared streets typically have vehicular travel routes and parking at the same elevation as a sidewalk. This means that the street section will not have its typical curb and gutter condition and will also need to reconcile where a regular street meets the woonerf. Raised intersections and crosswalks commonly feature short ramp transition zones to raise travel lanes to the desired shared height. The transition zones can also help alert drivers that they are entering a special area and a heightened awareness for pedestrians is necessary. A custom street design can include custom street planters and seating. In the instance of a shared street, raised planters made of a durable material could house low plantings and street trees; accommodate one or multiple built in seating ledges; and play a role in vehicular circulation by delineating the travel lanes, narrowing travel lanes to encourage slower travel speeds, or creating chicanes that slow-traffic to a greater degree. Material Contrast Street to Woonerf Transition Planter Seating Ledge 1 5 24 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Traveling east from downtown Yorkville, Van Emmon Street eventually becomes Van Emmon Road and meets Route 71, which connects Yorkville with Oswego. Van Emmon Street acts as the second gateway into downtown, particularly at its intersection with Bridge Street. Recently, buildings have been torn down along Van Emmon Street and the expectation of future redevelopment is not unreasonable. The approach traveling west into downtown along Van Emmon does not best represent Yorkville. Vegetation overgrowth between Mill Street and Heustis Street; an imbalanced street section of residential buildings with parking in front; a concrete retaining wall; and multiple “missing teeth” in the urban fabric leave much to be desired. Additionally, the intersection of Van Emmon Street and Bridge Street is not particularly inspiring, as each corner does not activate the intersection. Businesses are making an effort at providing visible programming at the intersection, but improvements are needed to establish the cohesive image the downtown Yorkville deserves. Van Emmon Street west of Bridge Street has a different character. It generally becomes more residential after the first half block. Naturally, the street section abruptly adjusts as it enters the neighborhood. Figure 30 - View West Down Van Emmon Street (Google) Figure 31 - View West Down Van Emmon Street (Google) Figure 32 - View West Down Van Emmon Street (Google Downtown’s Second Gateway Van Emmon Street (Existing) D O W N T O W N YORKVILLED O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE 10’ 12’12’ 10’ 12’ 8’8’5’5’12’ 13’13’ 6’6’ 12’ 4’ 4’4’13’13’ 2’2’11’11’ 14’12’ 12’18’ 12’ 12’8’8’ 8’ 23’23’4’4’6’ 6’ 6’ 6’4’22’16’2’12’8’8’ 6’10’10’Varies 6’ 72’ 72’60’ 50’ - 60’ 50’ - 60’ 60’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ Slip Lane Streetscape Master Plan 25 Van Emmon Street (Existing) D O W N T O W N YORKVILLED O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE 26 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Figure 33 - Landscape Beautification (Cedrus Landscaping) Figure 34 - Painted Grain Elevator (News OK) Tactical Interventions Van Emmon Street (Near-Term) Interventions should be focused at the intersection of Van Emmon Street and Bridge Street. Businesses on either side of the intersection are already considering providing outdoor seating options, which would add visible energy to the downtown when approaching from the south. This is a positive direction and can be amplified with the removal of parking spaces to construct a temporary or permanent parklet, providing a canopy or other form of weather protection, or introducing outdoor space heaters to extend seating months. This intersection is also the primary crossing for pedestrians and vehicles moving between the east and west sides of Bridge Street due to traffic signalization and pedestrian crossing indicators. Painting the crosswalk and intersection would be an opportunity to brand downtown, enhance safety and visibility for crossing pedestrians, and draw attention to its businesses. In addition to intersection treatments, the southwest corner of the intersection could be used for signage that greets residents and visitors traveling into downtown. Plans are already underway to improve the County Courthouse slope. County Courthouse Landscape Beautification Gateway Monument Signage Painted Crosswalks Painted Intersection Parklet Temporary Street Trees Outdoor Seating Painted Grain Elevator Painted Bridge Street Barrier/Railing 1 2 3 4 6 5 7 8 9 1 8 D O W N T O W N YORKVILLED O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE Streetscape Master Plan 27 Van Emmon Street (Near-Term) Figure 35 - Temporary Street Trees (ASLA)Figure 36 - Painted Crosswalk (Broward Palm Beach) 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 6 3 D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLED O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLED O W N T O WN YORKVILLED O W N T O W N YORKVILLE 28 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Van Emmon Street should be beautiful to establish a first impression to visitors, particularly east of Bridge Street. The mix of topography and building forms can be challenging when the desired outcome is a pleasant street; however, the asymmetry can be accommodated through careful design considerations. A primary consideration should include where stormwater is flowing. With elevated parcels on the south edge of Van Emmon Street, surface water will flow towards the street and sidewalk. Utilizing rain gardens that temporarily store rainwater before discharge or percolation and/or using permeable pavers that allow water to dissipate through the parking surface, are ways to accommodate the increased runoff. Also helping with stormwater, street trees should be planted on either side of the approach from the east to create a block long gateway when driving into Yorkville from Oswego. Downtown branding elements, such as seasonal banners and wayfinding signage, can add to the cohesion of downtown. The historic Kendall County Courthouse slope can act as a gateway feature incorporating signage, or some other built element, to establish a four-sided Van Emmon and Bridge Street intersect. These improvements could be completed in the near-term with the expectation that they would remain as other capital improvements take place. Figure 37 - Stormwater Streetscape (novitalas.com) Figure 38 - Intersection Improvements (PicSnaper) Figure 39 - Permable Parking Pavers (Village of Shorewood) Greeting Visitors with Beauty Van Emmon Street (Long-Term) D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLED O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLED O W N T O WN YORKVILLED O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLED O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE 10’ 12’12’ 10’ 12’ 8’8’5’5’12’ 13’13’ 6’6’ 12’ 4’ 4’4’13’13’ 2’2’11’11’ 14’12’ 12’18’ 12’ 12’8’8’ 8’ 23’23’4’4’6’ 6’ 6’ 6’4’22’16’2’12’8’8’ 6’10’10’Varies 6’ 72’ 72’60’ 50’ - 60’ 50’ - 60’ 60’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ Slip Lane Streetscape Master Plan 29 Van Emmon Street (Long-Term) Outdoor Seating Emphasized Crosswalks Painted Grain Elevator Improved Intersection Gateway Landscape/Signage Restriped Parking Restriped ParkingGateway Beautification 30 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Bulb-outs typically narrow roadways to direct traffic, slow speeds down, expand the sidewalk, or simply accommodate plantings. Integrating bulb-outs that also perform stormwater management functions, would be an attractive design feature along Van Emmon Street. Bulb-out curbs should be slotted, or notched with openings, to allow surface stormwater to enter and exit the planting zone of the bulb-out. Stormwater Bulb-Outs Figure 40 - Stormwater Bulb-Out (Toni Best) Figure 41 - Rain Garden (Vava) Figure 42 - Permeable Pavers (Terran Capital) Stormwater rain gardens could be used to improve runoff quality and provide detention for significant storm events. Like bulb-outs, they can accommodate a variety of planting types and should have inlets allowing water to flow in and out from the street. Trees and a variety of plantings that provide color and texture would add to the beautification of Van Emmon Street. Tying designs back to other streets within downtown, Van Emmon Street could feature open grid permeable pavers that both define the parking areas and increase stormwater capacity. Coordinating pavers between Van Emmon Street, Hydraulic Street, and any other location they are used in the greater downtown would support a cohesive design and branding language. Sidewalk Rain Gardens Permeable Parking Pavers 2 4 5 Streetscape Master Plan 31 Figure 43 - Van Emmon Street Diagram (Farr Associates) Van Emmon Street can represent Yorkville’s demonstration of a sustainable street section. The right-of-way width provides plenty of flexibility for a two-lane street. Additionally, the asymmetrical street section that has a higher elevation on one side is an ideal candidate to display sustainable stormwater strategies. Sustainable Street Section Slotted Curbs Stormwater Bulb-Out Planter Parallel Parking Rain Garden Planter Permeable Pavers 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 5 4 32 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District One of the most charming aspects of Yorkville, is the historic, small-town character inherent in the City’s streets and buildings. These streets may have narrow or no sidewalks, are often curbless, and exhibit a casual feel that may slightly change between each individual property. Many of these streets are both the front door and driveway access to homes and buildings. These types of streets that serve buildings through parking and service access are vital to the functionality of the neighborhoods. Around downtown the north/south streets that run parallel with Bridge Street act as ‘B’ Streets. These streets that feature a small-town character should continue to support the downtown uses, as well as provide a framework for future development to take place. Because future development will likely be limited, to an extent, and single-family homes exist immediately adjacent to the downtown blocks, the ‘B’ Streets should maintain a small-town character that aligns with many future uses but does not negatively affect existing single-family homes. Figure 44 - View North Down Main Street (Google) Figure 45 - View North Down Main Street (Google) Figure 46 - View North Down Main Street (Google) Small-Town Character ‘B’ Street (Existing) D O W N T O W N YORKVILLED O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE 10’ 12’12’ 10’ 12’ 8’8’5’5’12’ 13’13’ 6’6’ 12’ 4’ 4’4’13’13’ 2’2’11’11’ 14’12’ 12’18’ 12’ 12’8’8’ 8’ 23’23’4’4’6’ 6’ 6’ 6’4’22’16’2’12’8’8’ 6’10’10’Varies 6’ 72’ 72’60’ 50’ - 60’ 50’ - 60’ 60’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ Slip Lane Streetscape Master Plan 33 ‘B’ Street (Existing) 4 6 34 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Figure 47 - River Access Signage (Google) Figure 48 - Road Resurfacing (Decatur Daily) Figure 49 - View Towards Water (Google) Tactical Interventions ‘B’ Street (Near-Term) The ‘B’ Streets should be less of an investment priority. They receive less of the pedestrian and vehicular traffic compared to Bridge Street, Hydraulic Street, and Van Emmon Street. It is imporant that they play a supporting role, but resource allocation should be minimal. Ensuring sidewalk continuity and basic maintenance should be the City's top priority. Having overgrown landscape shoulders, missing and poorly maintained portions of the sidewalks, and poor road surfacing are examples of issues that should be addressed. Downtown’s ‘B’ Streets should be eligible for resurfacing and landscape maintenance. One unique aspect of downtown’s ‘B’ Streets, which primarily run north/south, is how they terminate into the Fox River. Each of these moments where drivers and pedestrians can look down the street and have a visual connection to the river is an opportunity that should be taken advantage of by implementing such measures as prohibiting parking, providing an active or focal point of interest, and trimming back overgrown vegetation to reveal the water. Added Crosswalks Towards River Roadside Swale Improvements Additional Street Trees River Access Signage Public Art/Sculpture at Main Street Terminus Trim Vegetation for View Towards Water 1 2 3 4 6 5 River Access 2 Streetscape Master Plan 35 ‘B’ Street (Near-Term) Figure 50 - Basic Roadside Swale (NACTO) 1 3 2 4 5 6 36 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District As streets are rebuilt to support a changing downtown, it will remain important to minimize impact on the pleasant, historic character of the surrounding neighborhood. Careful design consideration to not over-correct the ‘B’ Streets should be maintained. Community members have expressed how they value the small-town character that brought many of them to Yorkville, or kept them there, in the first place. Roadside swales can be used to both direct and detain stormwater. Plantings can include a mixture of City contributions and resident contributions. This will allow the property owner to make some customizations to the extension of their front lawn. For example, small wooden bridges might connect the street with the sidewalk to their front door. These small customizations add to the character that already exists. Small details can make these streets more attractive, such as having a curbless intersection that allows stormwater runoff to enter the roadside swales. The edge of the street pavement can be a gravel transition that delineates between travel lane and shoulder. Trees could be planted irregularly or even provided by the property owners from an approved landscape palette. Sidewalks should be narrow, but continuous to have minimal impact while providing maximum connectivity. Figure 51 - Roadside Swale (Green Infrastructure Digest) Figure 52 - Roadside Swale (Mithun) Figure 53 - Roadside Swale (IPFS) Redefining Small Town Streets ‘B’ Street (Long-Term) River Access D O W N T O W N YORKVILLED O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE 10’ 12’12’ 10’ 12’ 8’8’5’5’12’ 13’13’ 6’6’ 12’ 4’ 4’4’13’13’ 2’2’11’11’ 14’12’ 12’18’ 12’ 12’8’8’ 8’ 23’23’4’4’6’ 6’ 6’ 6’4’22’16’2’12’8’8’ 6’10’10’Varies 6’ 72’ 72’60’ 50’ - 60’ 50’ - 60’ 60’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ Slip Lane Streetscape Master Plan 37 ‘B’ Street (Long-Term) Emphasized Crosswalks Boat Launch River Views Landscape Buffer Restriped Parking ‘B’ Street 6 4 38 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Figure 54 - Rolled Concrete Apron (Specify Concrete) Figure 55 - Personalized Swale (City of Seattle) Figure 56 - Bridge Over Swale (Chesapeake Dock) Fitting with the character, roadside swales are often seen along rural or small-town streets or highways. They can take many forms and be aesthetically pleasing or simply utilitarian. They help detain and direct stormwater runoff from the roadway and provide a layer of buffer between sidewalk and street. Swales can be personalized by adjacent property owners or fully planted and maintained by the City. Small pedestrian bridges can connect the street to sidewalk at each property. Each can take on a slightly different design language or be required to adhere to set design guidelines. These bridges could be a unique contribution to a ‘B’ Street that features minimal design qualities. Roadside Swales Over-Swale Pedestrian Bridges Curbless streets often become unkempt with grass, weeds and dirt loosely defining the edge between roadway and shoulder. To maintain visual tidiness, a 18”-24" concrete curb ribbon may be used to transition from roadway to landscape. This straight curb type is often used along roads to prevent vehicles from crossing over into a pedestrian walkway or any outdoor landscaped area and provides a barrier between the roadway and amenity zone. Concrete Curb Ribbon Apron 6 Streetscape Master Plan 39 Each component from street, to swale, to narrow residential sidewalk works together to maintain a small town feel. No improvements should look over-engineered or oversized on Yorkville’s quaint neighborhood streets. These ‘B’ Streets should feel like a place where kids can play in the street and parents can take a quiet nighttime stroll. Maintaining Small Town Charm Resurfaced Travel Lane Flood Tolerant Street Trees Continuous Swale Along N/S Streets Bridge Over Swale Private Property Concrete Curb Ribbon Apron 11’ Tra v e l L a n e 11’ Co n t . S w a l e 4’ Sidew a l k Private 2’ Con c r e t e A p r o n 1 3 2 4 1 5 2 3 4 5 Figure 57 - ‘B’ Street Diagram (Farr Associates) 6 6 FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW ALUMINUM SIGN STIFFENER MOUNTING HARDWARE EXISTING LIGHT POLE 1/8” ALUMINUM ACCENT 1/8” ALUMINUM ACCENT 1/8” ALUMINUM FIELD (RED) 1/8” ALUMINUM “Y” (CREAM) 1/8” ALUMINUM BORDER (CREAM) 3M CREAM VINYL 4.5” LETTERING 1/8” ALUMINUM PANEL W/ MAP PAINTED FINISHES 3M CREAM VINYL 3.75” LETTERING 4'-0" 5'-10" 9'-0" DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE CITY HALL RIVERFRONT PARK FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW ALUMINUM SIGN STIFFENER MOUNTING HARDWARE EXISTING LIGHT POLE 3'-9" 4'-0" 10'-0" 1/8” ALUMINUM ACCENT 1/8” ALUMINUM ACCENT 1/8” ALUMINUM FIELD (RED) 1/8” ALUMINUM “RIVER/BRIDGE” (CREAM) 1/8” ALUMINUM BORDER (CREAM) 3M WHITE VINYL4.5” LETTERING 1/8” ALUMINUM PANEL W/ MAP PAINTED FINISHES DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE PPUBLIC PARKING 40 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Cohesive Downtown Signage Downtown Signage and Wayfinding Effectively navigating downtown is one of the major elements to be improved. For example, there is currently sufficient parking to accommodate patrons of the downtown uses; however, that parking is dispersed unevenly throughout downtown and is difficult to locate unless you are familiar with the area. Situations, such as no left turns allowed at the Bridge Street and Hydraulic Street intersection, make it difficult to navigate if a turn is missed and an opportunity to redirect is not obvious. One way to help alleviate this problem is through providing downtown signage. This signage can make a statement and solidify a cohesive brand and image for the area as a whole. From signage to banners or emblems, consistent, beautiful signage shows visitors that the city cares about providing an inviting user experience. Wayfinding Sign Directional Sign DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE YORKVILLE HOMETOWN DAYS FESTIVAL FRIDAY AUG. 31 - SUNDAY SEP. 02 5:00p-9:00p DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE YORKVILLE RIVER FEST FRIDAY JUL. 13 - SATURDAY JUL. 14 5:00p-10:00p SIDE VIEW 5" 8'-6" DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE FRONT VIEW 5'-5" 3'-6" 3” DIA. TAPCO POLE TAPCO DECORATIVE FINIALS TAPCO DECORATIVE BASE 2”X2” SQUARE ALUMINUM TUBING MOUNTING BRACKETS ENCLOSED LOCKING CABINET W/ CHANGEABLE GRAPHIC (INFORMATION BOX TO BE ILLUMINATED W/ WHITE SLOAN LEDS) CAM LOCK CUSTOM FABRICATED ALUMINUM CABINET W/ MAP PAINTED FINISH 3M WHITE VINYL 5.5” LETTERING 1/8” ALUMINUM FIELD (RED) 1/8” ALUMINUM “RIVER/BRIDGE” (CREAM) 1/8” ALUMINUM BORDER (CREAM) Streetscape Master Plan 41 DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE YORKVILLE HOMETOWN DAYS FESTIVAL FRIDAY AUG. 31 - SUNDAY SEP. 02 5:00p-9:00p DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE YORKVILLE RIVER FEST FRIDAY JUL. 13 - SATURDAY JUL. 14 5:00p-10:00p Information Kiosk Seasonal Banners 42 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Starting with three different wayfinding sign types: (1) an informational kiosk; (2) pole mounted directional signage; and (3) branded wayfinding signage; Yorkville can make a near-term impact on how users navigate the area. Informational kiosks can house either rotating or stationary content, such as maps, historic markers, or recreational programming. Maps can help pedestrians identify where they are in relation to other nearby destinations and help them discover new places to explore. These kiosks will be sidewalk mounted and cater to the pedestrian over vehicles. Directional signage is most effectively mounted on the existing light poles in locations that help drivers know when to turn for parking or riverfront access. The directional signage should have a specific purpose of getting someone from point A to point B. Though these signs should be pole mounted and high enough to be visible for passing cars, they should also be easily visible to pedestrians. As with each type of sign, wayfinding signage should be both branded and informative, letting users know that they are located in the proper area or neighborhood and provide markers for points of interest. Points of interest within downtown Yorkville may include specific restaurants, the historic Kendall County Courthouse, County offices, Bicentennial Riverfront Park, and public parking lots. Figure 58 - Informational Kiosk (Trans Associates) Figure 59 - Directional Signage (Flickr) Figure 60 - Branded Wayfinding Signage (Google) Downtown Wayfinding 0’75’150’300’ F o x R i v e r S Bridge StreetN Bridge StreetE Fox Street W Ridge Street W Madison Street E Van Emmon Street E Hydraulic Street Mill StreetS Main StreetState StreetHeustis StreetKey Kiosk Parking Wayfinding i i i i i P P P P P P Streetscape Master Plan 43 Downtown Signage 44 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Lighting is a key component of walkability, as it lends itself to creating a more safe environment for pedestrians. There are several streets where street lighting exists, but the lighting is inconsistent and is not always human-scaled. Lighting in the downtown can serve multiple functions, including branding the area, creating more vibrancy, and increasing safe conditions for residents and visitors. The increase and consistency of lighting gives people a sense of street character and trust of what is to come, and encourages walking and biking. Nancy Clanton of Clanton & Associates has provided lighting best-practices for municipalities by creating some “dos and don’ts” for street and facade lighting. In general, well-designed lighting strategies should not only light the area, but take into account all view angles while creating a beautiful ambiance without glare and annoyance. The list on page 45 expands on Nancy Clanton’s strategies. High color temperature (CCT) light sources have the highest concentration of blue light. Many municipalities are limiting the CCT of their street and pedestrian lighting to 3000K or less which is similar to the color of the setting sun. Dimming or turning off lighting is another strategy to reduce over- lighting an area. Ideally, light sources should change color over the course of the evening and into the late night. Blue light will enhance visibility during the rush hour, but as vehicular and pedestrian traffic decreases at night, the spectrum can minimize blue light and switch to the red range. Implement Lighting Best Practices Lighting Strategies Figure 61 - Street Lighting “Do” (American City and County) Figure 62 - Building Lighting “Do” (Houzz) Figure 63 - Public Space Lighting “Do” (Google) Streetscape Master Plan 45 Figure 64 - Street Lighting “Don’t” (Farr Associates) Figure 65 - Building Lighting “Don’t” (Farr Associates) Figure 66 - Public Space Lighting “Don’t” (Google) Street Lighting • Light sidewalks and streets appropriately for the neighborhood and explicitly where needed • Use low-glare streetlights • Minimize uplight of all kinds (cobra lights, etc.) Building Lighting • Mount light at the top of facades and aim inward • Emphasize architectural features such as columns and arches using beam distributions • Use warm-colored, dim light Public Space Lighting • Define the space with lighting of a consistent type and brightness • Dimly light the features where people gather: seating areas, outdoor dining, public parks and plazas Street Lighting • Use streetlights to light yards and private property • Overlight • Use high-glare streetlights Building Lighting • Aim across a visual path with a floodlight • Aim up a façade • Overlight • Select glaring luminaries Public Space Lighting • Light individual elements unless they are features • Flood the public space with heavy lighting • Appear messy and unorganized • Include multiple types of lighting accomplishing the same goal Lighting “Dos” Lighting “Don’ts” 46 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District It is widely understood that stormwater runoff from roofs, pavement, and other urban surfaces are contributing to water body degradation and flooding. Minimizing this impact, particularly in urban contexts, is often difficult because of the amount of land dedicated to dense buildings, supportive surface parking lots, and wide streets with generous sidewalks; however, there are strategies to accommodate both the urban and green infrastructure solutions. Yorkville has been a settlement for a long time - even longer than many other cities and villages in the greater Chicago area. The Fox River was the main reason for locating Yorkville where it is today, so taking measures to preserve the water quality, beauty, and function of the river should be a priority. The City has old stormwater infrastructure, so removing some of the burden would help to lengthen its useful life. As capital improvements occur, there is an opportunity to do two things: 1) updated the stormwater infrastructure and 2) construct green infrastructure in the public rights-of-way to reduce potential negative impacts of storm surges and surface runoff degradation the Fox River. Strategies such as rain gardens, bioswales on the sloped streets, or even green roofs could all contribute to beauty and utility. Green Infrastructure Stormwater Management Figure 67 - Residential Rain Garden (Metro Blooms) Figure 68 - Rain Garden Off Curbless Street (Prairie Rivers) Figure 69 - Rain Garden Signage (City of Springfield, MO) Green infrastructure is not familiar to everyone, so these can be excellent educational opportunities for the public. Signage and story-telling of why the City is placing rain gardens next to sidewalks and bioswales cascading down slopes could encourage residents to invest in doing the same on their properties. Additionally, the City could incentivize rain gardens or rain water cisterns for private residences to minimize negative impacts on natural resources and reduce flooding. Signage Encouraging Awareness Streetscape Master Plan 47 Permeable paving products, such as porous asphalt and concrete, as well as permeable pavers allow water to pass through the surface and into a stone storage layer below. The water stored in the stone layer either infiltrates into the soil below or is slowly released to a sewer or other drainage system to reduce stormwater runoff volumes and rates. Sediment, metals, and organic compounds are filtered and/ or biologically treated as the runoff moves through and is stored in the system. Properly designed permeable paving systems are applicable to both pedestrian and vehicular areas. Permeable paving should be avoided in the through lanes of high traffic areas (such as County and State highway routes) and areas of high sediment or other pollutant loading that could clog the system or overwhelm the system’s ability to treat typical urban runoff pollutants. Ideal locations for pervious pavement might be Hydraulic Street, parallel parking lanes, mid-block alleys, and surface parking lots. Pervious Pavement Figure 70 - Pervious Pavers (Techniseal) Figure 71 - Pervious Pavers (MWMO) Figure 72 - Paver Laying Machine (Detroit News) Pavers appear laborious to lay down in large quantities, such as a street or sidewalk; however, technology advancements have bred paver laying machines that lay down entire swaths of pavers in one motion. This drastically minimizes installation times, but still provides that hand-laid, classic look that is often loved for its character. Pavers can be cost competitive to concrete, because of the external impact it has on sizing stormwater infrastructure systems. Installing Pervious Pavers 48 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Yorkville’s current downtown does not compete well with some of the loved downtowns nearby, such as Oswego and Plainfield; however, it should not need to directly compete. Yorkville can distinguish itself with its own identity and unique character as a community. There are few better ways to do this than through public art. First and foremost, public art is free. Anyone can experience and enjoy it. It also adds a layer of uniqueness when so many downtowns attempt to emulate each other and therefore lose some of their authenticity. There are plenty of opportunities for public art, from blank walls on the sides of buildings, to vacant parcels and parking lots, and even the grain elevator. Each can become a canvas for community expression. The City should seek to commission works in addition to allowing community members to contribute pieces to the collection through interactive events for residents of all ages. When everyone can get involved, there is more of a sense of ownership over the end product. Public art is a medium to show visitors what Yorkville is all about. The Role of Public Art Public Art and Sculpture Figure 73 - Wall Mural on Blank Wall (City of Missouri City) Figure 74 - Interactive Sculpture (ISU College of Design) Figure 75 - Temporary Installation (Playscapes) Not only can art be something to experience visually, but it can also be interactive. This can be done through sculptures that encourage climbing or provide a backdrop for a photograph. Art can cater to children and adults alike and should remain informal enough to fit into Yorkville’s beloved small-town character. Make it Interactive! 0’75’150’300’ F o x R i v e r S Bridge StreetN Bridge StreetE Fox Street W Ridge Street W Madison Street E Van Emmon Street E Hydraulic Street Mill StreetS Main StreetState StreetHeustis StreetKey Wall Mural on Blank Wall Interactive Sculpture Temporary Installation Streetscape Master Plan 49 Potential Public Art Locations 50 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District (Page intentionally left blank) Supplemental Content 51 Appendix Supplemental Content Website Survey Results Context Scale Analysis Mapping Site Scale Analysis Mapping p. 68 p. 60 p. 52 52 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District The Downtown Overlay District context scale includes both the defined downtown from the 2016 Comprehensive Plan and the immediate surrounding areas, which includes the north banks of the Fox River. The following series of analysis maps reveals that downtown Yorkville has a variety of commercial, industrial, and public land uses surrounded by primarily lower density single-family housing. The underlying zoning allows for a more intense development pattern than currently exists; therefore, downtown has potential to densify and redevelop to more intense land uses. With relatively high traffic counts along Bridge Street, downtown experiences crosstown traffic that makes it visible and accessible by pedestrians and vehicles, and it could take advantage of higher traffic through non-residential uses. A TIF 1 and 2 are current and future strategies that seek to encourage reinvestment in the downtown. Though the TIF boundaries are not consistent with the downtown boundary defined in the map, it does include much of the downtown land and parcels along the Fox River. Parcels along the Fox River may be the most attractive to investors because of the views towards the river and access to recreation. Investment in public space along the river has helped provide a destination for visitors and residents alike. Additionally, recreational bicycle facilities, trails, and connections to the greater trail system offer opportunities to improve quality of life and may become a catalyst for future real estate investment. Downtown Overlay District Downtown Overlay Context Scale S. Bridge StreetN. Bridge StreetKing StreetLiberty StreetE. Main Street E. Hydraulic Str e e t E. Van Emmon Street E. S c h o o l h o u s e R o a d E Fox Street W Fox Str e et Mill StreetS Main StreetMorgan StreetHeustis StreetRiver Road E. Somonauk Street McHugh RoadF o x R i v e r Supplemental Content 53 Area Scale Map (Aerial)0’150’300’600’ S. Bridge StreetN. Bridge StreetKing StreetLiberty StreetE. Main Street E. Hydraulic Str e e t E. Van Emmon Street E. S c h o o l h o u s e R o a d E Fox Street W Fox Str e et Mill StreetS Main StreetMorgan StreetHeustis StreetRiver Road E. Somonauk Street McHugh RoadF o x R i v e r Key B-1 Local Business B-2 Retail Commerce Business B-3 General Business O Office M-1 Limited Manufacturing R-1 Single-Family Suburban Residence R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence R-2D Two-Family Attached Residence R-3 Multifamily Attached Residence R-4 General Multifamily Residence OS-1 Open Space (Passive) OS-2 Open Space (Recreational) A-1 Agricultural 54 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Existing Zoning Classifications 0’150’300’600’ S. Bridge StreetN. Bridge StreetKing StreetLiberty StreetE. Main Street E. Hydraulic Str e e t E. Van Emmon Street E. S c h o o l h o u s e R o a d E Fox Street W Fox Str e et Mill StreetS Main StreetMorgan StreetHeustis StreetRiver Road E. Somonauk Street McHugh RoadF o x R i v e r Key Residential Commercial Office Industrial Public / Quasi-Public Park / Open Space Supplemental Content 55 Existing Land Uses 0’150’300’600’ F o x R i v e r S. Bridge StreetN. Bridge StreetKing StreetLiberty StreetE. Main Street E. Hydraulic Str e e t E. Van Emmon Street E. S c h o o l h o u s e R o a d E Fox Street W Fox Str e et Mill StreetS Main StreetMorgan StreetHeustis StreetRiver Road E. Somonauk Street McHugh RoadKey TIF 1 Parcels Excluded from TIF 2 (Existing) TIF 1 Parcels Retained in TIF 2 (Existing) New TIF 2 Parcels (Approved) 56 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Existing TIF Boundaries 0’150’300’600’ F o x R i v e r S. Bridge StreetN. Bridge StreetKing StreetLiberty StreetE. Main Street E. Hydraulic Str e e t E. Van Emmon Street E. S c h o o l h o u s e R o a d E Fox Street W Fox Str e et Mill StreetS Main StreetMorgan StreetHeustis StreetRiver Road E. Somonauk Street McHugh RoadSupplemental Content 57 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) 17,40011,8006,9 0 0550800 850 600 2,800 3,200 18,9003,050 1,700 4,3503,500 0’150’300’600’ F o x R i v e r S. Bridge StreetN. Bridge StreetKing StreetLiberty StreetE. Main Street E. Hydraulic Str e e t E. Van Emmon Street E. S c h o o l h o u s e R o a d E Fox Street W Fox Str e et Mill StreetS Main StreetMorgan StreetHeustis StreetRiver Road E. Somonauk Street McHugh RoadKey Proposed Trailhead Proposed Trails Existing Parks and Open Space 58 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Parks and Proposed Trail Network F o x R i v e r S. Bridge StreetN. Bridge StreetKing StreetLiberty StreetE. Main Street E. Hydraulic Str e e t E. Van Emmon Street E. S c h o o l h o u s e R o a d E Fox Street W Fox Str e et Mill StreetS Main StreetMorgan StreetHeustis StreetRiver Road E. Somonauk Street McHugh RoadKey Loop Trail A Loop Trail B Loop Trail C Supplemental Content 59 Proposed Loop Trail System 60 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District The Downtown Overlay District site scale includes most of the downtown as defined in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, as well as the immediate areas to the north and south. The following series of analysis maps illustrates that downtown Yorkville features a walkable grid; however, certain factors are minimizing its effectiveness. Notable contributing factors include segments of non-continuous sidewalks, primary building entries being oriented towards parking lots, and blocks that feature highly visible surface parking. The primary stretch of downtown is defined by buildings that are built to the sidewalk in a continuous row along Bridge Street; however, Bridge Street’s priority as a truck route has added to an anti-pedestrian feel. With only a small stretch of downtown being defined by urban building types, walkability is limited. There are few buildings taller than two-stories, which reduces visual cues that downtown Yorkville is in fact a downtown. Some exceptions to this include the historic courthouse and grain elevator, which provide a unique sense of place. Large, vacant, or underutilized parcels are ripe for redevelopment and, with generous underlying zoning, should be attractive investments with modified guidelines. Downtown Overlay District Downtown Overlay Site Scale F o x R i v e r S Bridge StreetE Fox Street E Washington Street E Ridge Street E Van Emmon Street E Hydraulic Street Mill StreetS Main StreetMorgan StreetAdams StreetState StreetHeustis StreetSupplemental Content 61 Area Scale Map (Aerial)0’75’150’300’ F o x R i v e r S Bridge StreetE Fox Street E Washington Street E Ridge Street E Van Emmon Street E Hydraulic Street Mill StreetS Main StreetMorgan StreetAdams StreetState StreetHeustis StreetKey State-owned County-owned City-owned Private-owned 62 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Parcel Ownership 0’75’150’300’ F o x R i v e r S Bridge StreetE Fox Street E Washington Street E Ridge Street E Van Emmon Street E Hydraulic Street Mill StreetS Main StreetMorgan StreetAdams StreetState StreetHeustis StreetKey Building Entry Commercial Building Public Building Supplemental Content 63 Commercial Buildings & Frontages 0’75’150’300’ F o x R i v e r S Bridge StreetE Fox Street E Washington Street E Ridge Street E Van Emmon Street E Hydraulic Street Mill StreetS Main StreetMorgan StreetAdams StreetState StreetHeustis StreetKey Existing Sidewalk 64 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Existing Sidewalks 0’75’150’300’ F o x R i v e r S Bridge StreetE Fox Street E Washington Street E Ridge Street E Van Emmon Street E Hydraulic Street Mill StreetS Main StreetMorgan StreetAdams StreetState StreetHeustis StreetKey State Route Illinois Railway Inc. Supplemental Content 65 0’75’150’300’ROW Width and Ownership 60’ ROW 60’ ROW 50’ ROW 60’ ROW 60’ ROW60’ ROW80’ ROW60’ ROW60’ ROW60’ ROW50’ ROW50’ ROW50’ ROW50’ ROW80’ ROW66’ ROW 66’ RO W 66’ ROW 66’ ROW 66’ ROW F o x R i v e r S Bridge StreetE Fox Street E Washington Street E Ridge Street E Van Emmon Street E Hydraulic Street Mill StreetS Main StreetMorgan StreetAdams StreetState StreetHeustis StreetKey >50,000 sf 25,000 - 50,000 sf 10,000 - 25,000 sf <10,000 sf 66 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Parcel Area 0’75’150’300’ F o x R i v e r S Bridge StreetE Fox Street E Washington Street E Ridge Street E Van Emmon Street E Hydraulic Street Mill StreetS Main StreetMorgan StreetAdams StreetState StreetHeustis StreetKey 5-story (52 - 64 feet) 4-story (40 - 52 feet) 3-story (28 - 40 feet) 2-story (16 - 28 feet) 1-story (up to 16 feet) Supplemental Content 67 Building Heights 0’75’150’300’ 68 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District The Yorkville Downtown Overlay District website survey was posted between February 19, 2018, and March 12, 2018. The survey gathered 473 responses. The survey participants were conentrated in the 18 - 49 years old range. Key takeaways from the online survey include: • A faster actual driving speed on Bridge Street is revealed • People seem to feel safer than expected walking along Bridge Street; however, online comments conflict • There is a perceived or real lack of parking • Bridge Street is clearly important from a downtown image standpoint • All gateway elements seem popular; however, the overhead lights are leading • Bridge Street, Hydraulic Street, and Van Emmon Street are the focus • The form-based code should not regulate architectural www.downtownyorkville.com/ Website Survey Results style to leave flexibility • The “step back” question was difficult to comprehend in the survey format • The front of Bridge Street needs a makeover Supplemental Content 69 Which is our age group? When was the last time you visited downtown? Question 1 Question 2 70 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District What is the primary reason you come to downtown? (Check multiple) Where was the first place you lived as an adult? Question 3 Question 4 Supplemental Content 71 How fast do you drive through downtown on Bridge Street? Would you feel safe walking along Bridge Street? Question 5 Question 6 72 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District What is missing most from downtown? (Check multiple) Which image most represents your vision of downtown? Question 7 Question 8 Supplemental Content 73 Which street character do you prefer? Should Bridge Street be a gateway to downtown? Question 9 Question 10 74 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Which is a preferred gateway element into downtown? Which street do you most consider an ‘A’ Street? (Check multiple) Question 11 Question 12 Supplemental Content 75 Which architectural character do you prefer? Would attached housing be a good fit downtown? Question 13 Question 14 76 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Would multi-family housing be a good fit downtown? After how many stories should upper levels “step back” from the facade? Question 15 Question 16 Supplemental Content 77 Which place would you invest in first? Question 17 78 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District (Page intentionally left blank) YORKVILLE Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code United City of Yorkville Farr Associates Former Mayor Gary J. Golinski Bart Olson, City Administrator Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Jason Engberg, Senior Planner Eric Dhuse, Public Works Director Lisa Pickering, City Clerk Richard T. Hart, Chief of Police Tim Evans, Director of Parks and Recreation Brad Sanderson, EEI, Engineering Consultant Acknowledgements City Council Mayor John Purcell Joel Frieders, Alderman Chris Funkhouser, Alderman Ken Koch, Alderman Jacquelyn Milschewski, Alderman Jason Peterson, Alderman Arden Joe Plocher, Alderman Seaver Tarulis, Alderman Daniel Transier, Alderman Planning and Zoning Commissioners Randy Harker, Chairman Reagan Goins, Commissioner Debra Horaz, Commissioner Don Marcum, Commissioner Jeff Olson, Commissioner Richard Vinyard, Commissioner Daniel Williams, Commissioner FINAL DRAFT March 2019 3DRAFTTable of Contents 10-21-1 Introduction 1.A. Title 1.B. Intent 1.C. Overview of the Code 1.D. Applicability 1.E. How to Use The Code 1.F. Development Approval Process 1.G Nonconforming Structures 1.H Definitions 10-21-2 Districts 2.A. S1: Bridge Street District 2.B. S2: Hydraulic Street District 2.C. S3: Van Emmon Street District 2.D. S4: ‘B’ Street District 2.E. S5: ‘B’ Street - Residential District 2.F. Hierarchy of Districts 2.G. Primary Streets 10-21-3 Uses 3.A. General Provisions 3.B. Permitted Use Table 3.C. Use Requirements 10-21-4 Building Types 4.A. Introduction to Building Type Standards 4.B. Explanation of Building Type Table Standards 4.C. Downtown Commercial Building Type Siting Height & Use Facade & Roof 4.D. Downtown Living Building Type 4.E. Cottage Commercial Building Type 4.F. Civic Building Type 4.G. Attached Building Type 4.H. Yard Building Type 4.I. Entrance Types 4.J Roof Types 4.K Additional Design Requirements Materials and Color Windows, Awnings, and Shutters Rear Parking Facade Design Balconies 10-21-5 Site Development Standards 5.A. Signage 5.B. Parking Applicability Requirements (#) Multiple Use Reductions Credits Bicycle Parking Access 5.C. Landscape 5.D. Street Guidelines 5.E Temporary Structures Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code4DRAFTA. Title This Article 10-21 shall be known, cited, and referred to as the Downtown Overlay District code. Any reference to this Article following its effective date shall mean this entire Article as it may hereafter be amended. B. Intent It is the intent of this Article to provide development standards to the United City of Yorkville for downtown and adjacent redevelopment areas that promote public health, safety, and general welfare of the community, including, but not limited to the specific purposes set forth below. 1. To guide the development of a mix of uses and a pedestrian- oriented environment as established in the United City of Yorkville 2016 Comprehensive Plan, adopted September 2016, and the 2019 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Streetscape Master Plan. 2. To provide for a mix of housing types within the Downtown Overlay District and adjacent areas for people of all ages and lifestyles. 3. To achieve development that is appropriate in scale and intensity for the Downtown Overlay District and adjacent neighborhoods. C. Overview of the Code 1. Section 10-21-2: Districts. These regulations are organized within street types for adoption into the City’s existing code. These zoning districts shall be mapped on the City’s Zoning Map; however, the Primary Streets designation shall be referenced from Figure 10- 21-2G (4). The following Districts are established for mixed use, commercial, and residential development within downtown and adjacent redevelopment areas. Figure 10-21-1B (1) illustrates the locations for the districts. S1: Bridge Street District S2: Hydraulic Street District S3: Van Emmon Street District S4: ‘B’ Street District S5: ‘B’ Street - Residential District 3. Section 10-21-3: Uses. Use requirements are defined in Section 10-21-3 for each of the Street Districts. Uses may also be further limited by the Building Types. Refer to Section 10-21-2 Building Types and the “Uses” section in the tables per building type. 4. Section 10-21-4: Building Types. Six (6) Building Types are defined for use in the Street Districts. A mix of building types are typically permitted per district. These Building Types outline the desired building forms for the new construction and renovation of structures and contain regulations that determine physical building elements such as build-to-zones, transparency levels, entrance location, and parking location. Refer to Figure 10-21-4A (1) for a typical Building Type page layout. 5. Section 10-21-5: Site Development Standards. The site development standards provide references to other City ordinances or parts of the zoning ordinance and may include additional information or revision to those ordinances applicable only to the Street Districts. These include signage, parking, and landscape. D. Applicability These regulations apply to the downtown and adjacent redevelopment areas within the City as mapped on the City’s zoning map. Refer to Figure 10-21-1B (1) for affected parcels. E. How to Use the Code. Refer to Figure 10-21-1D (1) for a step by step illustration about applying the code to a parcel. Throughout this section, call out boxes titled “How to Use the Code” appear with code application instructions. F. Development Approval Process 1. Site Plan Review. An approved site plan is required for the development or redevelopment of all parcels in any District (refer to 10-4 of the Zoning Ordinance) with the following revisions: (a) The Community Development Director may approve a major site plan if the site plan complies with all requirements of the city’s zoning ordinance. If the Community Development Director denies approval of a major site plan, including the provision of written comments as to the reason for such denial, the denial may be appealed by the applicant to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall then recommend approval to City Council the major site plan, recommend approval to City Council of the major site plan with conditions, or recommend denial of the site plan to City Council. 2. Deviations. The Applicant shall submit requested deviations to the Community Development Director with the Site Plan application. The Community Development Director may approve deviations to a site plan for the following: (a) Minor Deviations. The Community Development Director may approve minor deviations to any dimension or percentage as follows: i. The location of the building within up to one (1) foot from any minimum yard requirement or build-to zone width/ location. ii. Up to five percent (5%) increase in total impervious coverage, not to exceed the total amount of permitted impervious plus semi-pervious coverage. iii. Up to five percent (5%) decrease in Front Property Line coverage. iv. Additional height of any story up to two (2) feet, as long as the overall building height does not exceed the allowable height of all floors at their maximum permitted height. (b) Design Deviations. The Community Development Director shall review and make a recommendation for the following deviations: i. Alternative Building Materials. The Director may approve alternative building materials from the requirements of Section 10-21-5, with the exception of the prohibited materials. For approval, the Applicant shall submit samples and local examples of the material a minimum of four weeks prior to the review, to allow site visits to the location. 10-21-1 Introduction FINAL DRAFT March 2019 5 10-21-4 Building Types 10-21-5 Development Standards 10-21-1 Introduction 10-21-1F Administration What Building Types are permitted in my designated district(s)? Refer to Section 10-21-4 Building Types. Determine permitted Building Types per district in Table 10-21-4A (1) Permitted Building Types by District. Select one Building Type per building or segment of building. Refer to the applicable Building Type regulations for building siting, height, use restrictions, street facade requirements, and roof type requirements found in Sections 10-21-4C through 10-21-4K. General Design Requirements apply. Refer to Section 10-21-4. 10-21-3 Uses What uses are permitted in my designated district(s)? Refer to Section 10-21-2 Uses. Determine permitted uses per district in Table 10-21-3B (1) Permitted Uses. Other standards per Section 10-21-3 may apply. What other requirements apply to Yorkville districts? Refer to Section 10-21-5 Site Development Standards. Refer to the applicable Signage, Parking, Landscape, Street, and Temporary Structure requirements found in Sections 10-21-5A through 10-21-5E. What are the City’s submittal requirements? Locate your parcel on the Yorkville Regulating Plan to determine district. Refer to Figure 10-21-1B (1) Yorkville Regulating Plan and Section 10-21-2 Districts for district descriptions. Refer to Section 10-21-1F Administration for the required submittal processes. Figure 10-21-1D (1). Yorkville Code Flow Chart. How To Use The Code DRAFT10-21-1 Introduction ii. Facade Variety Alternative. The Director may approve a reprieve from the facade variety requirements in Section 10-21-4. The Applicant shall submit fully rendered elevations and three (3) dimensional drawings of all street facades with materials samples for all surfaces to prove a higher quality building design with variation and relief from monotony. (c) Existing Building Deviations. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review and make a recommendation to City Council for the following deviations, when applied to the renovation of an existing building(s): i. For renovation of existing buildings, the maximum front property line coverage may be waived with an existing coverage of sixty percent (60%); however, any expansion on the ground story shall contribute to the extension of the front property line coverage. ii. For renovation of existing buildings, the location of the building within up to five (5) feet from any minimum yard requirement or build-to zone width/location. iii. For renovation of existing buildings, the minimum height of the ground story and upper story may be increased or decreased by up to two (2) feet for existing stories. iv. For renovation of existing buildings, other required dimensions may be modified up to five (5) feet or ten percent (10%), whichever is less, unless otherwise modified by this section. G. Nonconforming Structures 1. Nonconforming Uses. Refer to Section 10-15 of this Article for Non- Conforming Uses requirements with the following exception and addition. 2. Nonconforming Structures. The following regulations allow for the continuation of occupation of a structure that was legally constructed prior to the adoption or amendment to this code, but that could not occur under the provisions of this code. (a) All Building Type standards apply to all new construction and renovation of existing structures, where the renovation includes an addition of more than sixty percent (60%) in gross building square footage. (b) When the existing front or corner facade is located within the build-to zone and a renovation of the front facade occurs with or without any added building square footage, the Street Facade Requirements and Entrance Type Requirements of any permitted Building Type shall be met when the renovation includes any of the following: i. Installation of additional doors or a change in location of a door; ii. Expansion or change in location of thirty percent (30%) of windows on any street façade; or iii. Replacement of thirty percent (30%) or more of facade materials on any street facade with a different facade material. (c) When the existing building front or corner facade is located within the build-to zone and a renovation of the shape or style of the roof occurs with or without added building square Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code6 0’75’150’300’ F o x R i v e r S Bridge StreetN Bridge StreetE Fox Street W Ridge Street W Madison Street E Van Emmon Street E Hydraulic Street Mill StreetS Main StreetState StreetHeustis StreetKey Bridge Street Hydraulic Street Van Emmon Street ‘B’ Street ‘B’ Street - Residential Figure 10-21-1B (1). Yorkville Form-Based Districts Regulating Plan.DRAFT10-21-1 Introduction Note: Street Districts on primary streets may turn any corner and extend up to 100’ down any side street. FINAL DRAFT March 2019 7DRAFTfootage, the Roof Type Requirements of any permitted Building Type shall be met. (d) Under all circumstances, no portion of the Building Type standards must be met in the case of normal repairs required for safety and continued use of the structure, such as replacement of window or door glass. H. Definitions For the purposes of this document, the following terms shall have the following meanings: Applicant. The Owner of a subject property or the authorized representative of the Owner on which a land development application is being made. Block. Refer to Section 10-2-3 for definition. Block Depth. A Block measurement that is the horizontal distance between the Front Lot Line on a Block Face and the Front Lot Line of the parallel or approximately parallel Block Face. Block Ends. The Lots located on the end of a Block; these Lots are often larger than the Lots in the interior of the Block or those at the opposite end of the Block and can be located on a more intense Street Type. They are typically more suitable for more intensive development, such as multiple family or mixed Use development. Block Face. The aggregate of all the building Facades on one side of a Block. Block Length. A Block measurement that is the horizontal distance along the Front Lot Lines of the Lots comprising the Block. Building Type. The Facade of a structure defined by the combination of configuration, form, and function as it relates to the adjacent street. Refer to 10-21-4B Building Type Standards for more information and the list of permitted Building Types. Build-to Zone. An area in which the front or corner side facade of a building shall be placed; it may or may not be located directly adjacent to a lot line. The zone dictates the minimum and maximum distance a structure may be placed from a lot line. Refer to Figure 10-21-1H (3). Courtyard. An outdoor area enclosed by a building on at least three (3) sides and is open to the sky. Coverage, Building. The percentage of a Lot developed with a Principal or Accessory Structure. Coverage, Impervious Site. The percentage of a Lot developed with Principal or Accessory Structures and Impervious Surfaces, such as driveways, sidewalks, and patios. Refer to “Lot Coverage” in Section 10-2-3. Eave. The edge of a pitched roof, typically overhangs beyond the side of a building. Entrance Type. The permitted treatment types of the Ground Floor Facade of a Building Type. Refer to Section 10-21-4I for more information and a list of permitted Entrance Types. Expression Line. An architectural feature consisting of a decorative, three (3) dimensional, linear element, horizontal or vertical, protruding or indented at least two (2) inches from the exterior facade of a building typically utilized to delineate the top or bottom of floors or stories of a building. Facade. The exterior face of a building, including but not limited to the wall, windows, windowsills, doorways, and design elements such as Expression Lines. The front facade is any building face adjacent to the Front Lot Line. Frontage District. A type of zoning district specific to this Article, where the location, height and bulk of structures is defined by Building Types. Refer to Section 10-21-4. Landscape Area. Area on a Lot not dedicated to a structure, parking or loading facility, frontage buffer, side and rear buffer, or interior parking lot landscaping. Landscape Areas may include landscape, sidewalks, patios, or other pedestrian amenities. Lot, Flag. Refer to Section 10-2-3 for definition. Refer to Figure 10-21- 1H (2). Lot, Interior. For the purposes of this Chapter, a parcel of land abutting a vehicular Right-of-Way, excluding an Alley, along one Lot Line; surrounded by Lots along the remaining Lot Lines. Lot, Through. Refer to Section 10-2-3 for definition. Refer to Figure 10- 21-1H (2). Lot Area. Refer to Section 10-2-3 for definition; it is typically denoted in square feet or acres. Lot Depth. For the purposes of this Chapter, the smallest horizontal distance between the Front and Rear Lot Lines measured approximately parallel to the Corner and/or Side Lot Line. Refer to Figure 10-21-1H (2). Lot Frontage. Refer to Section 10-2-3 for definition. Lot Line, Corner. For the purposes of this Chapter, a boundary of a Lot that is approximately perpendicular to the Front Lot Line and is directly adjacent to a public Right-of-Way, other than an Alley or railroad. Refer to Figure 10-21-1H (2). Lot Line, Front. For the purposes of this Chapter, the boundary abutting a Right-of-Way, other than an Alley, from which the required Setback or Build-to Zone is measured, with the following exceptions. (a) Corner and through Lots that abut a Primary Street (refer to Figure 10-21-2G (4)) shall have the Front Lot Line on that Primary Street. (b) Corner and Through Lots that abut two (2) Primary Streets or do not abut a Primary Street shall utilize the orientation of the two (2) directly adjacent lots, or shall have the Front Lot Line determined by the Director. (c) Lot Line, Rear. Refer to Section 10-2-3 for definition. Refer to Figure 10-21-1H (2). Occupied Space. Interior building space regularly occupied by the building users. It does not include storage areas, utility space, or parking. Open Space. Refer to Section 10-2-3 (Public Open Space and Usable Open Space) for definitions. Open space may also be utilized to host temporary private or community events, such as a farmer’s 10-21-1 Introduction Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code8DRAFT10-21-1 Introduction market or art fair. Pedestrianway. A pathway designed for use by pedestrians; it can be located mid-block allowing pedestrian movement from one street to another without traveling along the block’s perimeter. Pervious Surface. Also referred to as pervious material. A material or surface that allows for the absorption of water into the ground or plant material, such as permeable pavers or a vegetated roof. Primary Street. A street that receives priority over other streets in terms of setting front lot lines and locating building entrances. Refer to Figure 10-21-2G (4) for mapped Primary Streets. Roof Type. The detail at the top of a building that finishes a Facade, including a pitch roof with various permitted slopes and a parapet. Refer to 10-21-4I for more information and a list of the permitted Roof Types. Scale. The relative size of a building, street, sign, or other element of the built environment. Semi-Pervious Surface. Also referred to as semi-pervious material. A material that allows for at least forty percent (40%) absorption of water into the ground or plant material, such as pervious pavers, permeable asphalt and concrete, or gravel. Setback. For the purposes of this Chapter, the horizontal distance from a Lot Line inward, beyond which a structure may be placed. For the purposes of this Chapter, structures and parking lots are not permitted within a Setback, unless specifically stated otherwise in this Chapter. Refer to Figure 10.21.1H (1). Solar Reflectance Index (SRI). A measure of a constructed surface’s ability to reflect solar heat, as shown by a small temperature rise. The measure utilizes a scale from zero (0) to one hundred (100) and is defined so that a standard black surface is zero (0) and a standard white surface is one hundred (100). To calculate for a given material, obtain the reflectance value and emittance value for the material; calculate the SRI according to ASTM E 1980-01 or the latest version. Story. For the purposes of this Chapter, a habitable level within a building measured from finished floor to finished floor. Refer to Section 10-21-4 for dimensions. Story, Ground. Also referred to as ground floor. The first floor of a building that is level to or elevated above the finished Grade on the Front and Corner Facades, excluding basements or cellars. Story, Half. For the purposes of this Chapter, a story either in the base of the building, partially below grade and partially above grade, or a story fully within the roof structure with transparency facing the street. Story, Upper. Also referred to as upper floor. The floors located above the Ground Story of a building. Street Face. The Facade of a building that faces a public Right-of-Way. Street Frontage. Also refer to Lot Frontage. The portion of a building or Lot directly adjacent to a vehicular Right-of-Way. Street Termini. At a three (3)-way or “T” intersection, it is the location where one street terminates at the other street. Streetwall. The vertical plane created by building Facades along a street. A continuous Streetwall occurs when buildings are located in a row next to the sidewalk without vacant Lots or significant Setbacks. Transparency. The measurement of the percentage of a facade that has highly transparent, low reflectance windows. Mirrored glass is not permitted. Yard. Refer to Section 10-2-3 for definition. Refer to Figure 10-21-1H (3) Illustration of Yards. Note that the Rear Yard is fully screened from the street by the Structure. (a) Yard, Corner Side. A Yard extending from the corner side building Facade along a Corner Side Property Line between the Front Yard and Rear Property Line. (b) Yard, Front. Refer to Section 10-2-3 for definition. (c) Yard, Rear. Refer to Section 10-2-3 for definition. (d) Yard, Side. Refer to Section 10-2-3 for definition. Visible Basement. A half story partially below grade and partially exposed above with required transparency on the street facade. FINAL DRAFT March 2019 9Side YardStreetStreet Setback LineSetback LineStreet Build-to Zone Build-to ZoneBuild-to Zone Setback Line Corner Side Yard= Yard Corner Lot Corner Lot Corner Lot Corner Lot Interior Lot Flag Lot Interior Lot Interior Lot Through Lot Lot Frontage Corner Lot Line Front Lot LineRear Lot LineLot WidthLot DepthStreetStreet StreetStreetStreet Street Front Yard Principal Building Principal Building Side YardSide YardFront Yard Rear YardRear Yard Figure 10-21-1H (3). Illustration of Yards. Figure 10.21.1H (1). Build-to Zone vs. Setback Line. Figure 10-21-1H (2). Lots.DRAFT10-21-1 Introduction Build-to Zone vs Setback Line A setback line indicates the closest a building may be placed to a property line, but is silent on where behind that line a building may be placed. A build-to zone indicates a zone or area in which the Facade of a building must be located. The use of a build-to zone allows some control over building placement, while the range provides some flexibility. This method also provides an element of predictability that is absent when the only requirement is to locate a building beyond a certain line. Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code10DRAFT10-21-2 Districts The following Districts are established for mixed use, commercial, and residential development within downtown and adjacent redevelopment areas. Figure 10-21-1B (1) illustrates the locations for the districts. S 1: Bridge Street District S 2: Hydraulic Street District S 3: Van Emmon Street District S 4: ‘B’ Street District S 5: ‘B’ Street - Residential District FINAL DRAFT March 2019 11 Bridge Street Building Placement Build-to Zone 0’ to 10’ Space Between Buildings Attached Detached 0’ 5’ to 10’ Building Volume Maximum Building Height 80’ Maximum Stories 6 Minimum Ground Floor Height 14’ Typical Street Attributes Typical ROW Width 72’ Number of Travel Lanes 4 Lane Width 10’ to 13’ Dedicated Turn Lanes 1 Parking Lanes none Pavement Width 60’ Dedicated Bicycle Facilities none Pedestrian Realm Pedestrian Facilities 6’ wide sidewalk Street Buffer concrete barrier D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O WN T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE 10’12’12’ 10’12’8’8’5’5’12’ 13’13’6’6’ 12’ 4’ 4’4’13’13’2’2’11’11’ 14’12’12’18’ 12’12’8’8’8’ 23’23’4’4’6’ 6’ 6’ 6’4’22’16’2’12’8’8’ 6’10’10’Varies 6’ 72’ 72’60’ 50’ - 60’ 50’ - 60’ 60’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ Figure 10-21-2A (1). Bridge Street (Long-term).DRAFT10-21-2 Districts A. S1: Bridge Street District The Bridge Street District may be considered the gateway into downtown Yorkville and retains potential to become the iconic stretch that helps draw people into local businesses and displays an attractive image that represents the people of Yorkville. The form of this retail and service- centered area establishes a street wall of storefront style-building facades with shallow build-to-zones along the sidewalk and parking in the rear or off-site. It focuses pedestrian-friendly retail and service uses on the ground story with office uses in upper stories. Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code12 Hydraulic Street Building Placement Build-to Zone 0’ to 15’ Space Between Buildings Attached Detached 0’ 10’ Building Volume Maximum Building Height 80’ Maximum Stories 5 Minimum Ground Floor Height 14’ Typical Street Attributes1 Typical ROW Width 48’ to 66’ Number of Travel Lanes 2 Lane Width 10’ to 12’ Dedicated Turn Lanes none Parking Lanes 1 lane of parallel parking on south side of street Pavement Width 22’ Dedicated Bicycle Facilities Multi-purpose lane on north side of street Pedestrian Realm Pedestrian Facilities 6’ to 8’ wide sidewalk Street Buffer 1 lane of parallel parking on south side of street; 4’ planter on north side of multi-purpose street Notes: 1 The Streetscape Master Plan includes a proposed slip lane on the south side of Hydraulic Street between Bridge Street and Heustis Street. This table includes dimensions for the public right-of-way section of the street. D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE 10’12’12’ 10’12’8’8’5’5’12’ 13’13’6’6’ 12’ 4’ 4’4’13’13’2’2’11’11’ 14’12’12’18’ 12’12’8’8’8’ 23’23’4’4’6’ 6’ 6’ 6’4’22’16’2’12’8’8’ 6’10’10’Varies 6’ 72’ 72’60’ 50’ - 60’ 50’ - 60’ 60’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ Slip Lane Figure 10-21-2B (1). Hydraulic Street (Long-term).DRAFT10-21-2 Districts B. S2: Hydraulic Street District The Hydraulic Street District includes complex conditions, including a tapering right-of-way that narrows from west to east and an active freight rail line that runs parallel to the street surface within the right- of-way. Hydraulic Street features short, utilitarian buildings, as well as an inoperable grain elevator, that create an eclectic mix of land uses and character. The form of this area remains pedestrian-centered but storefront-style buildings focus a broader spectrum of retail and service uses on the ground story with residential and/or office uses in upper stories. FINAL DRAFT March 2019 13 Van Emmon Street Building Placement Build-to Zone 0’ to 20’ Space Between Buildings Attached Detached 0’ 10’ Building Volume Maximum Building Height 80’ Maximum Stories 5 Minimum Ground Floor Height 12’ Typical Street Attributes Typical ROW Width 60’ Number of Travel Lanes 2 Lane Width 12’ Dedicated Turn Lanes none Parking Lanes 1 lane of parallel parking on each side of street; permeable paving 1 lane of parallel parking each side of street (intermittent planting on south side to accommodate parking) Pavement Width 24’ to 40’ Dedicated Bicycle Facilities none Pedestrian Realm Pedestrian Facilities 8’ to 12’ wide sidewalk Street Buffer 1 lane of parallel parking on north side of street; street trees or 1 lane of parallel parking on south side of street D O WN T O W N YORKVILLED O WN T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE 10’12’12’ 10’12’8’8’5’5’12’ 13’13’6’6’ 12’ 4’ 4’4’13’13’2’2’11’11’ 14’12’12’18’ 12’12’8’8’8’ 23’23’4’4’6’ 6’ 6’ 6’4’22’16’2’12’8’8’ 6’10’10’Varies 6’ 72’ 72’60’ 50’ - 60’ 50’ - 60’ 60’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ Slip Lane Figure 10-21-2C (1). Van Emmon Street (Long-term).DRAFT10-21-2 Districts C. S3: Van Emmon Street District The Van Emmon Street District is a lower scale district. Commercial, residential, and mixed use buildings make up this district in variety of building types. A broader spectrum of retail, service, and office uses support the Bridge Street and Hydraulic Street Districts and ground floor residential is permitted. The form of this area is pedestrian-centered, but allows for more vehicular access and off-street parking options. Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code14 ‘B’ Street Building Placement Build-to-line Location 0’ to 20’ Space Between Buildings Attached Detached 0’ 10’ Building Volume Maximum Building Height 80’ Maximum Stories 5 Minimum Ground Floor Height 9’ Typical Street Attributes Typical ROW Width 50’-60’ Number of Travel Lanes 2 Lane Width 11’ Dedicated Turn Lanes none Parking Lanes 1 lane of parallel parking each side of street (reduce planting where appropriate to accommodate parking) Pavement Width 26’ Dedicated Bicycle Facilities none Pedestrian Realm Pedestrian Facilities 5’ wide sidewalk Street Buffer 13’ swale and/or stormwater buffer; optional parking D O WN T O W N YORKVILLED O WN T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O WN T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE 10’12’12’ 10’12’8’8’5’5’12’ 13’13’6’6’ 12’ 4’ 5’5’8’8’ Opt. Planting Opt. Planting 5’5’2’2’11’11’ 14’12’12’18’ 12’12’8’8’8’ 23’23’4’4’6’ 6’ 6’ 6’4’22’16’2’12’8’8’ 6’10’10’Varies 6’ 72’ 72’60’ 50’ - 60’ 46’ - 62’ 60’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ Figure 10-21-2D (1). ‘B’ Street (Long-term).DRAFT2.0 Districts D. S4: ‘B’ Street District The ‘B’ Street District is a lower scale commercial district designed to serve adjacent neighborhoods and the greater community. Flanked by the Hydraulic and Van Emmon Districts, a wider range of residential uses is permitted. As one of the main street types between primary thoroughfares, pedestrian access and safety remains a priority. FINAL DRAFT March 2019 15 ‘B’ Street - Residential Building Placement Build-to-line Location 0’ to 15’ Space Between Buildings Attached Detached 0’ 10’ Building Volume Maximum Building Height 80’ Maximum Stories 3.5 Minimum Ground Floor Height 9’ Typical Street Attributes Typical ROW Width 50’ to 60’ Number of Travel Lanes 2 Lane Width 11’ Dedicated Turn Lanes none Parking Lanes 1 lane of parallel parking each side of street (reduce planting where appropriate to accommodate parking) Pavement Width 26’ Dedicated Bicycle Facilities none Pedestrian Realm Pedestrian Facilities 4’ wide sidewalk Street Buffer 13’ swale and/or stormwater buffer; optional parking D O WN T O W N YORKVILLE D O WN T O W N YORKVILLE D O WN T O W N YORKVILLE D O WN T O W N YORKVILLE D O W N T O W N YORKVILLE D O WN T O W N YORKVILLE D O WN T O W N YORKVILLE 10’12’12’ 10’12’8’8’5’5’12’ 13’13’6’6’ 12’ 4’ 4’4’13’13’2’2’11’11’ 14’12’12’18’ 12’12’8’8’8’ 23’23’4’4’6’ 6’ 6’ 6’4’22’16’2’12’8’8’ 6’10’10’Varies 6’ 72’ 72’60’ 50’ - 60’ 50’ - 60’ 60’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ 48’ - 66’24’ - 42’ Opt. 8’ Parking Opt. 8’ Parking Figure 10-21-2E (1). ‘B’ Street - Residential (Long-term).DRAFT2.0 Districts E. S5: ‘B’ Street - Residential District The ‘B’ Street Residential District is a lower-scale residential district with a mix of townhouses and yard buildings. With a maximum height of six (6) stories under the general provision of the zoning code, this area provides for a mix of housing types adjacent to downtown for people of all ages and lifestyles. Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code16 Primary Street Front Lot LineSecondary StreetAccess Drive Permitted Location Parking Primary Street Front Lot Line ParkingHighest(Primary)Lowest(Secondary)Bridge Street Hydraulic Street VanEmmon Street ‘B’ Street ‘B’ Street - Residential Principal Building Principal Building Figure 10-21-2G (2). Secondary Street Frontage: Access Drive Permitted Location Figure 10-21-2G (3). Primary Street Frontage Only: Access Drive Permitted Location Figure 10-21-2G (1). Hierarchy of Street Types.DRAFT10-21-2 Districts F. Hierarchy of Districts Development under this code is regulated by street type. The various street types are related to each other in a hierarchical manner. When these streets intersect, the primary street frontage is determined by its higher order in the hierarchy. The front of a building and its main entrance must face the primary street. Figure 10.21.2G (1) illustrates the hierarchy of street types. G. Primary Streets The Primary Streets Map designates Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Streets within the Downtown Overlay District. These designations prioritize the street frontages for locating the Front Lot Line for required amounts building frontage and allowable amounts of parking frontage. Refer to Figure 10.21.2G (4). 1. Vehicular Access. Vehicular access is also managed through this street prioritization within the Building Type requirements (refer to Section 10-21-4). See Figure 10.21.2G (2) and Figure 10.21.2G (3) for illustration of permitted vehicular access locations. (a) The order of access is typically as follows, unless otherwise permitted by Building Type: i. Lane (Tertiary Street) or Alley (un-mapped) permits unlimited access. ii. If no Lane or Alley exists, one (1) driveway per secondary street frontage is permitted. iii. If no tertiary or secondary street abuts the parcel, one driveway is permitted off the Primary Street and shared access with adjacent properties is encouraged. (b) Refer to the Subdivision Control Ordinance for additional requirements of vehicular access off adjacent streets. Interparcel Access requirements shall be met. 2. Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Street Designations. (a) Primary Streets. Primary streets require the most intact and continuous streetwall with few, if any, driveway access. The Front Lot Line shall always be located on the Primary Street. When a parcel is fronted by more than two (2) primary streets, the Director shall determine which is the appropriate street for the Front Lot Line. The determination should be based on locations of existing and other proposed development Front Lot Lines. i. Vehicular access should not be located off a primary street, unless no other options exists. Refer to Section 10-21-4 Building Type requirements for allowances of vehicular access, if applicable. (b) Secondary Streets. Secondary streets are intended to have a fairly continuous streetwall, but will likely have a driveway for each parcel. If no tertiary street exists, access will likely be off the secondary street. (c) Tertiary Streets. Tertiary streets typically have no streetwall requirements and could be fronted by parking structures and parking lots with multiple drives and/or vehicular access points. FINAL DRAFT March 2019 17 Primary Streets Key Primary Street Secondary Street 0’75’150’300’ Tertiary Street F o x R i v e r S Bridge StreetN Bridge StreetE Fox Street W Ridge Street W Madison Street E Van Emmon Street E Hydraulic Street Mill StreetS Main StreetState StreetHeustis StreetFigure 10-21-2G (4). Primary Streets Map.DRAFT10-21-2 Districts Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code18 How To Use The Code Districts CC1: CoreCC2: ShoppingCC3: Core SupportCC4: Residential / OfficeCC5: GatewayResidential & Lodging Uses Residential 8 8 4 4 8 Bed & Breakfast 0 Hotel/Motel 6 4 4 4 4 Care Facilities 8 8 4 0 4 Senior Housing 6 6 6 6 6 Civic / Institutional Uses Assembly Uses 4 4 4 Civic Offices & Services 4 4 4 4 Library/Museum 4 4 4 4 4 School: Elementary, Secondary 4 4 4 School: High School 4 4 School, Private or Special 0 0 Retail Uses Neighborhood Retail 4 4 4 6 4 General Retail 4 4 Adult Establishments 6 6 6 Service Uses Neighborhood Service 4 4 4 6 4 General Service 4 4 Automotive Specialty Shop 6 Service Station 6 Commercial Amusement, Outdoor 0 Daycare Facility 4 4 4 Hospital 4 4 Veterinary Clinic/Hospital or Kennel (Enclosed)6 6 6 Key 4 Permitted 8 Permitted in Upper Stories Only 6 Permitted with Development Standards 0 Requires Special Use Permit Figure 10-21-3A (1). Yorkville Code Permitted Uses How-To. Permitted Use Table Permitted Use Table The Permitted Use Table contains all the uses permitted in the Downtown Overlay District. It is organized by district, so only the information in a parcel’s district is applicable to that parcel. The other columns do not apply. For example, a parcel in CC1 only applies the standards from that column, illustrated below. EXAM P L EDRAFTA. General Provisions The following establishes a simplified set of uses permitted within the Building Forms of each downtown form-based zoning district. 1. Uses by District. Permitted and special uses available in each form- based district are shown in Table 10-21-3B (1). 2. Use Definitions. Uses listed in Tables 10-21-3C (1) - 10-21-3C (4) are defined in Section 10-2-3 of the Zoning Ordinance. Further definitions applicable only to the Yorkville Form-Based Districts are located in Section 10-21-3C. 3. Permitted Use (“4”). These uses are permitted by-right in the form districts in which they are listed. 4. Permitted in Upper Stories Only (“8”). These uses are permitted by-right in the districts in which they are listed, provided that the uses are located in the upper stories of a structure. These uses may also be located in the ground story provided that they are located beyond a depth of at least twenty feet from the front primary facade. 5. Requires a Special Use Permit (“0”). These uses require a Special Use Permit (refer to Section 10-6 Special Use Regulations) in order to occur in the districts in which they are listed and must follow any applicable development standards associated with the use as well as meet the requirements of the special use. 6. Permitted with Development Standards (“6”). These uses are permitted in the districts in which they are listed, provided that they are developed utilizing the listed development standards. These standards, combined with the Building Type requirements, are intended to alleviate any negative impacts associated with the use, making it appropriate in a district where it otherwise might not have been appropriate. 7. Prohibited Use. A blank cell or an unlisted use in the use table indicates that the land use is prohibited in that district. 8. City Determination. When a proposed land use is not explicitly listed in Table 10-21-3B (1), the Director shall determine whether or not it is included in the definition of a listed use or is so consistent with the size, scale, operating characteristics and external impacts of a listed use that it should be treated as the same use. Any such determination may be appealed to the Planning and Zoning Commission. 9. Temporary Accessory Uses. Temporary accessory uses are permitted in all Downtown Overlay Districts, including outdoor displays, seasonal displays and sales, festivals, and vendors. The following requirements apply: (a) Outdoor displays are permitted up to eight (8) hours per day, no more than three (3) consecutive days in any one (1) month. (b) Build-to Zone. Temporary outdoor displays of merchandise are permitted in the Build-to Zone without a permit, subject to all other requirements of Section 10-21-3. (c) Right-of-way. Any temporary outdoor display or occupation in the right-of-way requires a review approval by the Community Development Director. 10-21-3 Uses FINAL DRAFT March 2019 19 Key 4 Permitted 8 Permitted in Upper Stories Only 6 Permitted with Development Standards 0 Requires Special Use Permit Districts S 1: Bridge StreetS 2: Hydraulic StreetS 3: Van Emmon StreetS 4: ‘B’ StreetS 5: ‘B’ Street - ResidentialResidential & Lodging Uses Category Residential Dwelling 8 4 4 4 4 Hotel/Motel 6 6 6 0 Bed & Breakfast Inn 8 8 0 0 0 Residential Care Facility 0 0 Senior Housing 6 6 6 0 Civic & Institutional Uses Category Civic Offices & Services 4 4 4 4 4 Library/Museum 4 4 4 0 0 Police & Fire 6 6 6 Post Office (no distribution)4 4 4 Religious & Organization Assembly 4 4 4 4 4 School: Public or Private 0 0 0 0 0 School: College 0 0 0 0 0 Retail & Service Uses Category Neighborhood Retail (<8,000 sf)4 4 4 4 0 General Retail 6 6 6 Neighborhood Service 4 4 4 0 0 General Service 6 6 6 Recreation/Entertainment 4 4 6 0 Automotive Services 0 0 0 Food Services & Drinking Places 4 4 4 4 0 Office & Industrial Uses Category Office 8 4 4 4 Small-Scale Industry 6 6 6 4 Infrastructure Uses Category Communication Antennae & Towers 0 0 0 0 0 Parking Lot 6 6 6 6 6 Parking Structure 6 6 6 6 6 Public Utility & Infrastructure 4 4 4 4 4 Open Space Uses Category Open Space 6 6 6 6 6 Districts S 1: Bridge StreetS 2: Hydraulic StreetS 3: Van Emmon StreetS 4: ‘B’ StreetS 5: ‘B’ Street - ResidentialAccessory Uses Alternative Energy Generation 6 6 6 6 6 Amphitheater 0 0 Car Washes, Detail Shops, and/or Service Stations 0 0 0 Drive Through Facility 0 0 0 Home Occupation 4 4 4 4 4 Outdoor Storage of Goods 6 6 6 Outdoor Restaurant Dining 4 4 4 4 Parking Lot (Accessory)6 6 6 0 Parking Structure (Accessory)6 6 6 Roadside Produce Stand/Vending 6 6 Sidewalk Sales 6 6 6 0 0 Temporary Storage Containers 6 6 6 6 Mobile Food Vendors 6 6 6 6 6 Temporary Structures 6 6 6 6 6 Table 10-21-3B (1). Permitted Uses Table.DRAFT10-21-3 Uses Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code20DRAFTB. Permitted Use Table See Table 10-21-3B (1) for a list of permitted and special uses. C. Use Requirements 1. Residential and Lodging Uses. A category of uses that include several residence types. (a) Refer to 10-2-3 for the following definitions. i. Residential. ii. Bed & Breakfast Inn. (b) Hotel/Motel. Refer to 10-2-3 for definition. In the districts where a hotel/motel requires development standards (“6”), rooms shall be located in the upper stories. Lobbies and eating facilities shall be located on the ground floor. (c) Residential Care Facility. A facility offering temporary or permanent lodging to the public consisting of an unlimited number of sleeping rooms with or without in-room kitchen facilities. Includes such uses as independent and assisted living facilities, nursing homes, residential care homes, and transitional treatment facilities. Assistance with daily activities may be provided for residents. Secondary service uses may also be provided, such as dining and meeting rooms. Rooms shall be accessed from the interior of the building. In the districts where this use requires a special use permit (“0”), refer to Section 10-21-1F for procedure and development standards. (d) Senior Housing. In the districts where Senior Housing requires development standards (“6”), the following shall apply: i. Housing shall be designed, constructed and operated in accordance with the Fair Housing Amendments Act. ii. The Property shall comply with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations and copies of any applicable permits shall be provided to the Department prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (e) Use Permits. When a use is listed as permitted with a Use Permit “0,“ refer to Section 10-21-1F for procedure and development standards. 2. Civic & Institutional Uses. A category of uses related to fulfilling the needs of day-to-day community life including assembly, public services, educational facilities, and hospitals. (a) Civic Offices & Services. Any use that involves transactions between the City government and residents, property owners, or others doing business with the City or other activities related to the function of the municipality. (b) Library/Museum. A structure open to the general public housing educational, cultural, artistic, or historic information, resources, and exhibits. May also include food service and a gift shop. (c) Police & Fire. A facility providing public safety and emergency services; training facilities, locker rooms, and limited overnight accommodations may also be included. The facilities shall be housed in a permitted building, but shall have the following additional allowances: i. Garage doors are permitted on the front facade. ii. Exempt from maximum driveway widths. 10-21-3 Uses (d) Post Office. A publicly accessed facility for the selling of supplies and mail related products and the small scale collection and distribution of mail and packages. Large-scale postal sorting and distribution is not permitted. (e) Religious & Organization Assembly. Assembly Uses include Assembly Hall; Church, Temple, or Other Place of Worship; and Clubs. (f) Use Permits. When a use is listed as permitted with a Special Use Permit “0,“ refer to Section 10-21-1F for procedure and development standards. 3. Retail & Service Uses. A category of uses that include several retail and service types. Refer to Section 10-2-3 for definitions. (a) Neighborhood Retail. A use in this category occupies a space of less than 8,000 square feet. Neighborhood retail includes such uses as those listed in Table 10-21-3C (1). i. When Neighborhood Retail is permitted with development standards “6“, it is limited to 8,000 square feet. (b) General Retail. A use in this category includes all Neighborhood Retail uses occupying a space of greater than 8,000 square feet and such uses as those listed in Table 10- 21-3C (1). (c) Service Uses. A category of uses that provide patrons services and limited retail products related to those services. Visibility and accessibility are important to these uses, as most patrons do not utilize scheduled appointments. (d) Neighborhood Service. A use in this category occupies a space of less than 8,000 square feet. Neighborhood service includes such uses as those listed in Table 10-21-3C (2). i. When Neighborhood Service is permitted with development standards “6“, it is limited to 6,000 square feet. (e) General Service. A use in this category includes all Neighborhood Service uses occupying a space of greater than 8,000 square feet and such uses as those listed in Table 10- 21-3C (2). (f) Recreation/Entertainment. Refer to Table 10-21-3C (3). (g) Automotive Services. Refer to Section 10-2-3 for definition. In the districts where this use requires a special use permit (“0”), the following applies: i. The use shall meet all of the requirements of the Building Type, refer to Section 10-21-4. ii. Service doors shall all be located on the rear or interior side facade of the building. iii. The showroom or retail space shall be located in the front storefront of the building and shall occupy a minimum of twenty percent (20%) of the gross floor area. (h) Food Services & Drinking Places. Food Services & Drinking Places include only the following: i. Full Service Restaurants ii. Carry-out Food Service Stores iii. Quick Service Restaurants iv. Banquet Centers & Caterers v. Drinking Places (Alcoholic Beverages) FINAL DRAFT March 2019 21DRAFT10-21-3 Uses vi. Brewpubs. A microbrewery that brews beer for both on and off-premise consumption, and may include a bar and/or restaurant. vii. Wine Establishments. A properly licensed business which sells wine only (not liquor or beer) for both on and off- premise consumption, as well as wine accessories and/ or merchandise. 4. Office & Industrial Uses. A category of uses for businesses that involve the transaction of affairs of a profession, service, industry, or government. Patrons of these businesses usually have set appointments or meeting times; the businesses do not typically rely on walk-in customers. Office uses include those listed in Table 10-21-3C (4), List of Typical Uses in Office Category. (a) Office. Office uses include those listed in Table 10-21-3C (4), List of Typical Uses in Office Category. (b) Small-Scale Industry. A use involving small scale manufacturing, production, assembly, and/or repair with little to no noxious by-products that includes a showroom or small retail outlet. Small-Scale Industry includes such uses as those found in Table 10-21-3C (5). List of Typical Uses in Cottage Industry Category. The following development standards apply: i. This use may also include associated facilities such as offices and small scale warehousing, but distribution is limited to vans and small trucks. Distribution access shall be from the rear. ii. The maximum overall gross floor area is limited to 10,000 square feet, unless otherwise noted. iii. The showroom or retail outlet shall be located in the front storefront of the building and shall occupy a minimum of twenty five percent (25%) of the gross floor area. 5. Infrastructure & Open Space Uses. (a) Communication Antennae & Towers. Refer to Section 10-18. Communication Antennae & Towers located within the right-of- way or on utility poles are premitted. (b) Parking Lot. A lot that does not contain a permitted building and is solely used for the parking of vehicles. In the districts where a parking lot requires a special use permit (“0”), the following applies: i. Corner Lots. A corner lot shall not be used as a parking lot. ii. Adjacent Parking Lots. Two (2) parking lots cannot be located directly adjacent to one another. iii. Single Family. Parking lot cannot be associated with a single family use. iv. Distance. Parking lot must be within 1,300 feet of the principal entrance to the associated use unless: (i) At least seventy five percent (75%) of the spaces are dedicated for public use. (ii) An approved joint parking agreement is in place. v. Pedestrian Access. Must be connected to associated use by a dedicated, public pedestrian pathway. vi. Commercial Vehicles. Parking lots for commercial vehicles are not permitted in Downtown Overlay Districts. (c) Parking Structure. A parking structure on a lot that does not contain a permitted Building Type and is solely used for the parking of vehicles. In the districts where a parking lot requires a special use permit (“0”), the following applies: i. Corner Lots. A corner lot shall not be used for a parking structure. ii. Adjacent Parking Lots. Two (2) parking facilities (lots or structures) cannot be located directly adjacent to one another. iii. Primary Street. No facade of the Parking Structure shall be located on a Primary Street. Refer to Figure 10-21-2G (4). For Parking Structures located on a Primary Street, the Main Street Building Type shall be utilized, requiring occupation of the building in the front thirty (30) feet of the facade on any Primary Street. iv. Distance. Parking lot must be within 1,300 feet of the principal entrance to the associated use unless: (i) At least seventy five percent (75%) of the spaces are dedicated for public use. (ii) An approved parking agreement is in place (refer to Section 10-16). v. Pedestrian Access. Must be connected to associated use by a dedicated, public pedestrianway. vi Commercial Vehicles. Parking structures for commercial vehicles are not permitted in these districts. (d) Utility and Infrastructure. A lot that is primarily utilized for the City’s infrastructure needs. Utility and infrastructure includes such uses as electric or gas services, sewage treatment, water treatment and storage, and energy conversion systems. 6. Open Space Uses. A use of land for active or passive, public or private, outdoor space, including such uses as parks, plazas, greens, playgrounds, or community gardens. Open space uses may also be utilized to host temporary private or community events, such as a farmer’s market or art fair. In the districts where open space is permitted with development standards (“6”), the following apply: i. Stormwater Accommodations. Open space that incorporates stormwater management on a site or district scale is encouraged. (i) Stormwater facilities shall be designed to accommodate additional uses, such as an amphitheater or a sports field. (ii) Stormwater facilities shall be designed not to be fenced and shall not impede public use of the land they occupy. ii. This use may involve small scale food and beverage service, no more than two hundred (200) square feet in space, located in a kiosk, with no service access. iii. Buildings located directly adjacent to an open space use shall treat facades facing this use with street facade requirements. 7. Accessory Uses. A category of uses that are not permitted to serve as the principal use on a zoning lot. These uses are incidental to Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code22 Primary Street Building Footprint Drive- Through Canopy Front Property Line Figure 10-21-3C (1). Recommended drive-through Facility layout.DRAFT10-21-3 Uses and customary in connection with the principal building or use and located on the same lot with such principal building or use. (a) Alternative Energy Generation. Refer to Section 10-19. Alternative energy generation includes structures for solar, wind, and geothermal. The following development standards apply: i. Roof or Building Mounted Solar panels are permitted with the following requirements: (i) Panels mounted at the same angle of the roof or flush on the building facade are permitted on any roof or building face. (ii) Panels projecting off the roof or building at a different angle are limited to the rear and side facing roofs, unless solar access is limited in these locations. (iii) Panels shall not extend more than ten (10) feet at maximum pitch/tilt above the surface of the roof to which they are attached. On pitched roofs, panels shall not extend more than three (3) feet. ii. Roof Mounted Small Wind Energy Systems are permitted with the following requirements: (i) Maximum rated capacity of five kW is permitted per turbine. (ii) One turbine is permitted for each seven hundred and fifty (750) square feet of roof area. (iii) Maximum height is fifteen (15) feet above the surface of the roof. iii. Geothermal Energy is permitted in any yard with the following requirements: (i) Any related above ground structure shall be located in a side or rear yard with a maximum height of ten (10) feet, subject to all requirements of the Building Type. (b) Amphitheater. Refer to Section 10-2-3 for definition. In the districts where an amphitheater is permitted with a special use permit “0,“ the following apply: i. Location. The amphitheater shall be located within an Open Space District (refer to Section 10-10). ii. The hours of operation shall be posted and limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. (c) Car Washes, Detail Shops and/or Service Stations. Refer to Section 10-2-3 for definitions. In the districts where car washes, detail shops and/or service stations are permitted with a special use permit (“0”), the following apply: i. Location. Use must be located inside a parking garage and not visible from the exterior of the parking garage. (d) Drive-through Facility. In the districts where drive-through structures are permitted with development standards (“6”), the following applies. Refer to Figure 10-21-3C (1) for one illustration of the following requirements. i. Structure/Canopy. Drive-through structures or canopies shall be located on the rear facade of the building or in the rear of the lot behind the building, where permitted by use. The structure shall not be visible from any Primary Street. ii. Stacking Lanes. Stacking lanes shall be located perpendicular to the Primary Street or behind the building. iii. The canopy and structure shall be constructed of the same materials utilized on the building. (e) Home Occupation. An occupational use that is clearly subordinate to the principal use as a residence and does not require any alteration to the exterior of a building. (f) Outdoor Storage of Goods. i. Commercial Uses. This use includes outdoor storage of goods not typically housed or sold indoors, such as large scale materials and building and landscape supplies. In the districts where Outdoor Storage of Goods is permitted with development standards (“6”), the following apply: (i) Loose materials shall not be stacked higher than six (6) feet. (ii) Loose materials shall at a minimum be stored in a three sided shelter and shall be covered. (iii) Materials shall be set back a minimum of ten (10) feet from any property line. (iv) Materials shall not be located on required parking spaces or associated drive aisles. (v) All outdoor storage areas shall be screened from view of adjacent parcels and vehicular rights-of-way using the Side or Rear Buffer. ii. Residential Uses. This use includes temporary storage of personal or household goods in personal on demand storage (PODS) containers. In the districts where outdoor storage of goods is permitted with development standards (“6”), the following development standards apply: (i) One (1) storage container can be located on a lot at a time. (ii) On site storage of a container is permitted for up to two (2) months per year. (iii) Containers shall not be located in the Front Yard, but permitted on a driveway. (g) Outdoor Restaurant Dining. Commercial outdoor dining, serviced by an adjacent service use, and permitted in any FINAL DRAFT March 2019 23DRAFT10-21-3 Uses yard. When in a side yard along the front Lot Line, the Patio Frontage buffer is required. (h) Parking Lot. An uncovered paved surface used solely for the parking of vehicles, intended for use by the occupants in an adjacent building on the lot. Parking lot locations are regulated by Building Type. Refer to Section 10-21-4. (i) Parking Structure. A structure used solely for the parking of vehicles, intended for use by the occupants in an adjacent building on the lot. Parking Structures within the buildings are regulated per Building Type. Refer to Section 10-21-4. (j) Roadside Produce Stand or Vending. Refer to Section 10-21-1 for definition. (k) Sidewalk Sales. A temporary outdoor sale of merchandise by retail businesses, typically occurring on the sidewalk within the public right-of-way for a limited period of time. In the districts where a Sidewalk Sale is permitted with development standards “6,“ the following apply: i. A minimum of four (4) feet of the sidewalk must remain available for passing pedestrians. ii. Sidewalk Sales are permitted for up to three (3) days no more than six (6) times per calendar year. iii. Merchandise must be stored inside the building during non-business hours. iv. Merchandise sold shall either be regularly carried within the store, or have been regularly carried within the store in the past year. (l) Temporary Storage Containers. Outdoor storage of personal or retail stock materials on a temporary basis within a portable storage container. When a Temporary Outdoor Storage use is permitted with development standards “6,“ the following apply. i. One (1) storage container may be located on a lot at a time. ii. On site storage of a container is permiitted for up to two (2) weeks; up to four (4) weeks is permtted with approval of the Director. iii. The container shall be located in the rear yard, screened by the building from any primary or secondary street. (m) Mobile Food Vendors. A motorized or towed wheeled vehicle that is designed and equipped to sell food. Shall include both “hot trucks” upon which food is cooked and prepared for vending, and “cold trucks” from which only ready to eat or packaged foods are handled. Refer to Section 10-3-14. Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code24 Neighborhood Retail (less than 8,000 square feet) Antique Shop Art & Education Supplies Art Gallery Bakery, Retail Bicycle Sales & Repair Book, Magazine, & Newspaper Store Camera & Photo Supply Store Candy Store China & Glassware Shop Clothing & Clothing Accessories Coffee Shop Computer Software Sales Delicatessen Electronic Sales & Service Fabric & Craft Store Florist Garden Center/Plant Nursery Gift, Novelty, & Souvenir Shop Hardware Store Hobby Shop Jewelry Sales & Repair Luggage & Leather Goods Microbreweries, Microwineries Music Store & Instruction Musical Instrument Repair & Sales Office Supply Optical Goods Paint & Wallpaper Party Supply Shop Pet & Pet Supply Specialty Food Market (Butcher, Fish Market, Produce, etc.), with no alcohol sales Sporting Goods Sales & Rental Stationary & Paper Store Toy Shop Video/Game Sales Wine Establishment (no liquor/beer) General Retail All Neighborhood Retail (over 8,000 square feet) Appliance Sales & Service Department Store Drug Store/Pharmacy Furniture & Home Furnishings General Merchandise Stores Grocery Store Medical Supply Store Used Merchandise Stores (not including books, clothing & antiques) Neighborhood Service (less than 8,000 square feet) Amusement Arcade Barber Shop & Beauty Salon Catering/Carry-Out & Delivery Communication Service Childcare Centers Dance/Fitness Studio Dry Cleaning & Laundry Emergency Care Clinic Framing Health & Fitness Center Home Furniture & Equipment Repair Locksmith Mailing Services Massage Establishments Nail Salon & Specialty Body Pet Grooming Photocopying & Printing Photography Studio & Supplies Physical Therapy/Physical Rehabilitation Repair of Small Goods & Electronics Restaurant/Bar Services (Spa) Shoe Repair Tailor & Seamstress Theater Travel Agency, Ticketing & Tour Operator Veterinarian (no outdoor training, boarding or kennels) General Service All Neighborhood Services (over 8,000 square feet) Bowling Alley Recreation/Entertainment Billiard Parlor Boat Sales & Rental Boat Storage Indoor Playground Indoor Shooting Gallery/ Gun Range Marina Outdoor Music Venue Railroad Passenger Station Skating Rink Stadium Swiming Pool Office Architecture/Engineering/Design Broadcasting & Telecommunications Studio Building Contractor (office only) Business Consulting Charitable Institutions Clinic Computer Programming & Support Detective Services Educational Services (tutor & testing) Employment Agency Financial & Insurance Government Offices Legal Services Management Services Medical & Dental with Laboratory Motion Picture & Sound Recording Studio Small-Scale Industry Apparel & Finished Fabric Products Bakery & Confections Beverages, including Beer, Wine, Coffee Botanical Products Brooms & Brushes Canning & Preserving Food Dairy Products Electrical Fixtures Engraving Fabricated Metal Products Film Making Furniture & Fixtures Glass Jewelry, Watches, Clocks, & Silverware Leather Products Microbreweries, Microwineries Musical Instruments & Parts Pottery, Ceramics, & Related Products Research Laboratory Shoes & Boots Signs & Advertising Smithing Taxidermy Toys & Athletic Goods Upholstery Woodworking PR & Advertising Professional Services Property Development Real Estate Research & Development Research Agency Surveying Tax Services Table 10-21-3C (1). List of Typical Uses in Retail Category. Table 10-21-3C (5). List of Typical Uses in Small-Scale Industry Category. Table 10-21-3C (4). List of Typical Uses in Office Category. Table 10-21-3C (2). List of Typical Uses in Service Category. Table 10-21-3C (3). List of Typical Uses in Recreation/Entertainment Category DRAFT10-21-3 Uses FINAL DRAFT March 2019 25 This page intentionally left blank DRAFT10-21-3 Uses Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code26 Building Types by Districts Districts S1: Bridge StreetS2: Hydraulic StreetS3: Van Emmon StreetS4: ‘B’ StreetS5: ‘B’ Street - ResidentialBuilding TypesDowntown Commercial 4 4 4 4 Downtown Living 4 4 4 Cottage Commercial 4 4 4 4 Civic Building 4 4 4 4 4 Attached Building 4 4 0 Yard Building 0 4 4 Permitted 0 Requires Permit / Review DRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDistricts DRAFTDistricts Table 10-21-4A (1). Permitted Building Types by District principal structure. ii. Detached accessory structures are allowed per each Building Type and shall comply with all setbacks except the following: (i) Detached accessory structures are not permitted in the front yard. (ii) Detached accessory structures shall be located behind the principal structure in the rear yard. (iii) Detached accessory structures shall not exceed the height or size (area) of the principal structure. 2. Page Layout. Document pages are laid out to provide the maximum amount of information for each building type on one spread of two pages. Refer to Figure 10-21-4A (1) for a typical Building Type layout page. (a) Tables. Refer to Section 10-21-4B for further information on each Table. (b) Graphics typically represent one example of a building that could be developed utilizing the standards for that building type. Graphics are provided to illustrate general intent. In all cases, tables and text supercede graphic representations. 4.0 Building Types A. Introduction to Building Type Standards The buildings detailed in this section outline the Building Types permitted for new construction and renovated structures within the Districts defined in Section 10-21-2. 1. General. All Building Types shall meet the following requirements to achieve the intents defined for the districts. (a) Zoning Districts. Each Building Type shall be constructed only within its designated districts. Refer to Table 10-21-4A (1) Permitted Building Types by Districts. (b) Uses. Each Building Type can house a variety of uses depending on the district in which it is located. Refer to 15.3 for uses permitted per district. Some Building Types have additional limitations on permitted uses. (c) No Other Building Types. All buildings constructed shall meet the standards of one of the Building Types within the zoning district of the lot. (d) Permanent Structures. All buildings constructed shall be permanent construction without a chassis, hitch, or wheels, or other features that would make the structure mobile, unless otherwise noted. (e) Accessory Structures. i. Attached accessory structures are considered part of the 10-21-4 Building Types Tables define the regulations for each Building Type. Refer to 10-21-4B Explanation of Building Type Table Standards for narrative explanation of each line item. Graphics related to the tables on the left. Graphics typically represent one example of Building Type standards Intent of the Building Type. One Building Type per Spread of Two Pages Sandy Springs City Center Districts DRAFT20 13.2 Frontage Types Permitted Districts CC1: Core CC2:Shopping CC3: Core Support CC5: Gateway (a) Building Siting Refer to Figure 13.2.3 (1). Minimum Front Lot Line Coverage 95% 90% 2 90% 65% Occupation of Corner Required Required Required Required Front Build-to Zone 0’ to 10’ 5’ to 15’ 1 0’ to 15’ 10’ to 25’ Corner Build-to Zone 0’ to 5’ 5’ to 10’ 0’ to 10’ 10’ to 25’ Courtyard Permitted 25%30% 30%50% Minimum Side Yard Setback 0’5’5’10’ Minimum Rear Yard Setback 5’5’5’25’ Minimum Lot Width Maximum Building Width [200’]30’none 30’none 30’none 30’none Maximum Impervious CoverageAdditional Semi-Pervious Coverage 75% 25% 65% 15% 75% 20% 60% 15% Parking & Loading Location Rear yard Rear yard 2 Rear yard Rear & side yards Entry for Parking within Building Rear facade Rear & side facades Rear facades Rear & side facades Vehicular Access Alley; if no alley exists, 1 driveway per non-primary street frontage; if no side street, 1 driveway permitted off Primary Street; shared access is encouraged. 1 driveway per 100’ of street frontage (b) Height Refer to Figure 13.2.3 (2) Minimum Overall Height 2 stories 1 story 2 stories 1 story Maximum Overall Height 8 stories 8 stories 3 8 stories 4 stories Ground Story: Minimum Height Maximum Height 14’18’14’24’ 4 14’18’14’24’ 4 Upper Stories: Minimum Height Maximum Height 9’12’ 9’15’ 9’12’9’15’ (c) Uses Refer to Figure 13.2.3 (2) Ground Story Permitted Civic, Retail & Service uses. Refer to 13.6. Permitted Retail, Service, and Office uses. Refer to 13.6. All permitted uses. Refer to 13.6. All permitted uses. Refer to 13.6. Upper Story All permitted uses. Refer to 13.6. Parking within Building Permitted fully in any basement and in rear of upper floors Occupied Space 30’ deep on all full height floors from the front facade (d) Street Facade Requirements Refer to Figure 13.2.3 (3). Minimum Ground Story Transparency Measured between 18” and 8’ above grade 75% 65%75%50% Minimum Transparency Upper Stories 20%15% 20%15% Blank Wall Limitations Required per floor Front Facade Entrance Type Storefront, Arcade Principal Entrance Location Front or Corner Facades Front, Side, or Corner Facades Front or Corner Facades Front, Side, or Corner Facades Number of Front Facade Street Entrances Minimum 1 for every 60’ or less of facade none Vertical Facade Divisions One per designated width of facade 30’50’ 30’50’ Horizontal Facade Divisions Within 3’ of the top of the ground story and the bottom of any fifth floor (e) Roof Type Requirements Refer to Figure 13.2.3 (3). Permitted Roof Types Parapet, Pitched, Flat Tower Permitted 3. Storefront Building. A. Description & Intent. The Storefront Building is a mixed use building located at the front and corner property lines allowing easy access to passing pedestrians. Parking may be provided in the rear of the lot, internally in the building. Storefronts with large amounts of transparency and regularly spaced entrances off the street are required on the ground floor front facade. Ground floor uses are limited to those with high levels of pedestrian activity, such as retail, and service uses, with additional commercial, office, and/or residential uses in the upper stories. B. Regulations. Regulations for the Storefront Frontage Type are defined in the adjacent table. b g i c a d h f e u o n m l q j k p r s t v Notes: 1 Where the distance from back of curb to edge of sidewalk is 10 feet or less and no additional right-of-way is required, an 8’ to 18’ Build-to Zone is required. 2 Lots wider than 100 feet are permitted up to one double-loaded aisle of parking (maximum width of 70 feet), located perpendicular to the front lot line in the side yard, and shall meet a Front Lot Line Coverage of 60%. 3 Maximum height is 12 stories for parcels with Roswell Road street frontage south of Hammond Drive and north of I-285. 3 20’ or more in height counts as two stories towards maximum building height. w x DRAFT December 30, 2012DRAFT 21 13.2 Frontage Types Figure 13.2.3 (2): Height & Use Requirements. Front Property Line Rear Property Line Corner Side Property LineNon-Primary StreetPrimary Street Side Property LineFTFFAlley b b g g i i c c a a d dh h f f e e Figure 13.2.3 (1): Building Siting. Figure 13.2.3 (3): Street Facade Requirements. street uD street Front Lot Lineo o o o nl m q j k p p p p p p r r s s s s s s ss ss ss t x h h i Front Property Line Rear Property Line Corner Side Property LineNon-Primary StreetPrimary Street Side Property LineAlley Typical Site Plan.Site Plan with side parking (DT 2, DT 3, and DT3 only). PRINCIPAL BUILDING PRINCIPAL BUILDING w v Permitted Districts CC1: Core CC2:Shopping CC3: Core Support (a) Building Siting Refer to Figure 13.2.2 (1). Minimum Front Lot Line Coverage 95% 90% 2 90% Occupation of Corner Required Required Required Front Build-to Zone 0’ to 10’ 5’ to 15’ 1 0’ to 15’ Corner Build-to Zone 0’ to 5’5’ to 10’0’ to 10’ Courtyard Permitted 25%30%30% Minimum Side Yard Setback 0’5’5’ Minimum Rear Yard Setback 5’5’5’ Minimum Lot Width Maximum Building Width 30’ none 30’ none 30’ none Maximum Impervious Coverage Additional Semi-Pervious Coverage 75% 25% 65% 15% 75% 20% Parking & Loading Location Rear yard Rear yard 2 Rear yard Entry for Parking within Building Rear facade Rear & side facades Rear facades Vehicular Access Alley; if no alley exists, 1 driveway per non- primary street frontage; if no side street, 1 driveway permitted off Primary Street; shared access is encouraged. (b) Height Refer to Figure 13.2.2 (2) Minimum Overall Height 2 stories 1 story 2 stories Maximum Overall Height 8 stories 8 stories 3 8 stories Ground Story: Minimum Height Maximum Height 14’ 18’ 14’ 24’ 4 14’ 18’ Upper Stories: Minimum Height Maximum Height 9’ 12’ 9’ 15’ 9’ 12’ (c) Uses Refer to Figure 13.2.2 (2) Ground Story Permitted Civic, Retail & Service uses. Refer to 13.6. Permitted Retail, Service, and Office uses. Refer to 13.6. All permitted uses. Refer to 13.6. Upper Story All permitted uses. Refer to 13.6. Parking within Building Permitted fully in any basement and in rear of upper floors Occupied Space 30’ deep on all full height floors from the front facade (d) Street Facade Requirements Refer to Figure 13.2.2 (3). Minimum Ground Story Transparency Measured between 18” and 8’ above grade 75% 65%75% Minimum Transparency Upper Stories 20%15%20% Blank Wall Limitations Required per floor Front Facade Entrance Type Storefront, Arcade Principal Entrance Location Front or Corner Facades Front, Side, or Corner Facades Front or Corner Facades Number of Front Facade Entrances Minimum 1 for every 60’ or less of facade Vertical Facade Divisions One per designated width of facade 30’50’ 30’ Horizontal Facade Divisions Within 3’ of the top of the ground story and the bottom of any fifth floor (e) Roof Type Requirements Refer to Figure 13.2.2 (3). Permitted Roof Types Parapet, Pitched, Flat Tower Permitted b g i c a d h f e u o n m l q j k p r s t v w x Permitted Use Table Page Layout Building Type pages are laid out to provide the maximum amount of information for each Building Type on one spread of two pages. Graphics typically represent one example of a building that could be developed utilizing the standards for that Building Type. Graphics are provided to illustrate general intent. In all cases, tables and text supercede graphic representations. Permitted Use Table Building Type Tables Refer to 10-21-4B for an explanation of each line item on the tables. Building Type tables contain all the standards for that Building Type. They are organized by district, so only the information in a parcel’s district is applicable to that parcel. The other columns do not apply. For example, a parcel in CC1 only applies the standards from that column, illustrated below.DRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFT13.2 Frontage TypesDRAFT13.2 Frontage TypesDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTRear Property LineDRAFTRear Property Line AlleyDRAFTAlleyDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTMaximum Impervious Coverage DRAFTMaximum Impervious Coverage Additional Semi-Pervious Coverage DRAFTAdditional Semi-Pervious Coverage Parking & Loading Location DRAFTParking & Loading Location Entry for Parking within Building DRAFTEntry for Parking within Building DRAFTi DRAFTi DRAFTh DRAFTh Figure 10-21-4A (1). Representative Building Types Spread. Figure 10-21-4A (2). Building Type Table Example. 10-21-4 Building Types How To Use The Code FINAL DRAFT March 2019 27 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code28 Permitted Districts District A District B (a) Building Siting Multiple Principal Buildings Not permitted Not permitted Minimum Front Lot Line Coverage 95% 65% Occupation of Corner Required Required Front Build-to Zone 0’ to 20’ 1 5’ to 20’ 1 Corner Build-to Zone 0’ to 5’0’ to 10’ Minimum Side Yard Setback 0’5’ Minimum Rear Yard Setback 5’; 25’ if located adjacent to residential Minimum Lot Width Maximum Building Width 30’ none 30’ none Maximum Impervious Coverage Additional Semi-Pervious Coverage 75% 3 25% 65% 3 15% Parking & Loading Location Rear yard Rear yard Entry for Parking within Building Rear & Side Facades Vehicular Access Alley; if no alley exists, 1 driveway per street frontage EXAM P L E EXAM P L E EXAM P L E EXAM P L E EXAM P L E EXAM P L E EXAM P L E EXAM P L E EXAM P L E EXAM P L E EXAM P L E EXAM P L E EXAM P L E 0’ to 5’ EXAM P L E 0’ to 5’ EXAM P L E EXAM P L E EXAM P L E 0’ EXAM P L E 0’5’ EXAM P L E 5’ Minimum Rear Yard Setback EXAM P L E Minimum Rear Yard Setback 5’; 25’ if located adjacent to EXAM P L E 5’; 25’ if located adjacent to residential EXAM P L E residential Minimum Lot WidthEXAM P L E Minimum Lot Width Maximum Building WidthEXAM P L E Maximum Building Width Maximum Impervious CoverageEXAM P L E Maximum Impervious CoverageEXAM P L E EXAM P L E Additional Semi-Pervious CoverageEXAM P L E Additional Semi-Pervious Coverage Width of Principal Building Width of Front Build-to Zone (BTZ) (minus driveway width) Building Footprint Width of Principal Building Width of Front Build-to Zone (BTZ) Building FootprintDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTTable 10-21-4B (1). Example Building Siting Requirements Table from a Typical Building Type. Figure 10-21-4B (1). Measuring Front Lot Line Coverage 10-21-4 Building Types B. Explanation of Building Type Table Standards The following explains and further defines the standards outlined on the tables for each Building Type, refer to Sections 10-21-4C through 10-21-4H. 1. Building Siting. The following explains the line item requirements for each Building Type Table within the first section entitled “Building Siting”. Table 10-21-4B (1) illustrates an example of a Building Siting Table from a typical Building Type. (a) Multiple Principal Structures. The allowance of more than one (1) principal structure on a lot. (b) Minimum Front Lot Line Coverage. Refer to Figure 10-21-4B (1). Measurement defining the minimum percentage of street wall or building facade along the street. The width of the principal structure(s) (as measured within the front build-to zone) shall be divided by the maximum width of the front build-to zone (BTZ). i. Certain buildings have this number set to also allow the development of a courtyard along the front lot line. ii. Some frontage types allow side yard parking to be exempted from the front lot line coverage calculation. If such an exemption is permitted, the width of up to one (1) double loaded aisle of parking, located with the drive perpendicular to the street and including adjacent sidewalks and landscaping, may be exempted, to a set maximum in feet. iii. When driveway is located at the front lot line (Figure 10-21-4B (1)) and a side yard parking is not utilized, a driveway width of twenty (20) feet may be deducted from the width of the BTZ and is not included in the calculation of the minimum front lot line. (c) Occupation of Corner. Occupying the intersection of the front and corner build-to zones with a principal structure. (d) Front Build-to Zone. The build-to zone or setback parallel to the front lot line. Building components, such as awnings or signage, are permitted to encroach beyond the build-to zone. i. All build-to zone and setback areas not covered by building shall contain either landscape, patio space, or sidewalk space. (e) Corner Build-to Zone. The build-to zone or setback parallel to the corner side property line. i. All build-to zone and setback areas not covered by building shall contain either landscape, patio space, or sidewalk space. (f) Minimum Side Yard Setback. The minimum required setback along a side property line. i. All build-to zone and setback areas not covered by building shall contain either landscape, patio space, or sidewalk space. (g) Minimum Rear Yard Setback. The minimum required setback along a rear property line. i. All build-to zone and setback areas not covered by building shall contain either landscape, patio space, or sidewalk space. (h) Minimum Lot Width. The minimum width of a lot, measured at the build-to zone. Permitted Districts District A District B (b) Height Minimum Overall Height 2 stories 2 story Maximum Overall Height 5 stories 5 stories Ground Story: Minimum Height Maximum Height 14’ 18’ 14’ 18’ Upper Stories: Minimum Height Maximum Height 9’ 12’ 9’ 12’EXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLE 2 stories EXAMPLE 2 stories Maximum Overall HeightEXAMPLEMaximum Overall Height 5 storiesEXAMPLE5 stories Ground Story: Minimum HeightEXAMPLE Ground Story: Minimum Height Maximum HeightEXAMPLE Maximum Height 14’EXAMPLE 14’ Upper Stories: Minimum HeightEXAMPLE Upper Stories: Minimum Height Maximum HeightEXAMPLE Maximum Height Maximum Impervious Coverage = Building Coverage + Impervious Surfaces Corner Property LineFront Lot Line Building Footprint Parking Grade. Ground Story Upper Story Roof Type Bottom of Parapet Eave Height Grade Ground Story Upper Story Roof Type Finished Floor DRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTBottom of DRAFTBottom of Parapet DRAFTParapet Story DRAFTStory Table 10-21-4B (2). Example Height Requirements Table from a Typical Building Type. Figure 10-21-4B (2). Maximum Impervious & Additional Semi-Pervious Coverage. Figure 10-21-4B (3). Measuring Height 10-21-4 Building Types (i) Maximum Building Width. The maximum width of a building, measured across the front facade. (j) Maximum Impervious Coverage. (Refer to Figure 10-21- 4B (2)). The maximum percentage of a lot permitted to be covered by principal structures, accessory structures, pavement, and other impervious surfaces. (k) Additional Semi-Pervious Coverage. The additional percentage of a lot beyond the Maximum Impervious Coverage, which may be surfaced in a semi-pervious material, including a green roof or pavers. (l) Parking & Loading Location. The yard in which a surface parking lot, detached garage, attached garage door access, loading and unloading, and associated drive is permitted. (m) Entry for Parking within Building. Permitted garage door location for parking entrance when parking is located within building. (n) Vehicular Access. The permitted means of vehicular ingress and egress to the lot. i. Alleys, when present, shall always be the primary means of access. ii. When alleys are not present, a driveway may be permitted per Building Type and, if an alternative is available, shall not be located off a Primary Street. 2. Height. The following explains the line item requirements for each Building Type Table within the second section entitled “Height”. Table 10-21-4B (2), illustrates an example of a Height Requirements Table from a typical Building Type. (a) Minimum Height (in Stories). The minimum overall height for the building shall be located within the build-to zone; stories above the minimum height may be stepped back from the facade. (b) Maximum Height (in Stories). The sum of a building’s total number of stories. i. Half stories are located either completely within the roof structure with street-facing windows or in a visible basement exposed a maximum of one half story above grade. ii. A building incorporating both a half story within the roof and a visible basement shall count the height of the two (2) half stories as one (1) full story. iii. Some Building Types require a building facade to step back as its height increases. The upper stories of any building facade with street frontage shall be setback a designated amount beyond the building facade of the lower stories. FINAL DRAFT March 2019 29 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code30 Permitted Districts District A District B (c) Uses Ground Story Per Section 15.3 Uses Upper Story Per Section 15.3 Uses Parking within Building Permitted fully in any basement and in rear of upper floors Occupied Space 20’ deep on all full height floors from the front facade Permitted Districts District A District B (d) Street Facade Requirements Minimum Ground Story Transparency Measured between 2’ and 8’ above grade 65% 65% Minimum Transparency Upper Stories 20%20% Blank Wall Limitations Required per floor Front Facade Entrance Type Storefront, Arcade Principal Entrance Location Front or Corner Facades Number of Street Entrances Minimum 1 for every 50’ or less of facade Ground Story Vertical Divisions One per every 30’ of facade width Horizontal Facade Divisions Within 3’ of the top of the ground story and the bottom of any fifth floor Facade Variety Required Refer to 15.4B.4(h) for requirements.Every 80’ of facade width EXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLE Principal Entrance Location EXAMPLE Principal Entrance Location Front or Corner Facades EXAMPLE Front or Corner Facades Number of Street EntrancesEXAMPLENumber of Street Entrances Minimum 1 for every 50’ or less of EXAMPLEMinimum 1 for every 50’ or less of facadeEXAMPLE facade Ground Story Vertical DivisionsEXAMPLE Ground Story Vertical Divisions EXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEPer Section 15.3 UsesEXAMPLEPer Section 15.3 Uses Upper StoryEXAMPLEUpper Story Per Section 15.3 UsesEXAMPLEPer Section 15.3 Uses Parking within BuildingEXAMPLE Parking within Building Upper StoryEXAMPLEUpper Story DRAFTDRAFTGround Story DRAFTGround Story Upper Story DRAFTUpper Story DRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTUpper Story DRAFTUpper Story Parking within Building DRAFTParking within Building Occupied Space DRAFTOccupied Space EXAMPLE DRAFTEXAMPLEEXAMPLE DRAFTEXAMPLEEXAMPLE DRAFTEXAMPLEUpper StoryEXAMPLEUpper Story DRAFTUpper StoryEXAMPLEUpper Story Parking within BuildingEXAMPLE Parking within Building DRAFTParking within BuildingEXAMPLE Parking within Building Table 10-21-4B (4). Example Street Facade Requirements Table from a Typical Building Type. Table 10-21-4B (3). Example Uses Table from a Typical Building Type. 10-21-4 Building Types iv. Floors within the building shall be visibly designated on the street facades by the use of expression lines or the layout of the windows. (c) Ground Story and Upper Story, Minimum and Maximum Height. (Refer to Figure 10-21-4B (3)). Each frontage type includes a permitted range of height in feet for each story. Additional information is as follows: i. Floor height is measured in feet between the floor of a story to the floor of the story above it. ii. For single story buildings and the uppermost story of a multiple story building, floor to floor height shall be measured from the floor of the story to the tallest point of the ceiling. iii. Double height spaces may be located along any non- street facade or in the entrance way to the building. The entrance way shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the street facade. 3. Uses. The following explains the line item requirements for each Building Type Table within the third section entitled “Uses.” Refer to Section 10-21-3 for uses permitted within each District. The requirements in this section of the Building Type Tables may limit those uses within a specific Building Type. Table 10-21-4B (3) illustrates an example of the Uses table from a typical Building Type. (a) Ground and Upper Story. The uses or category of uses which may occupy the ground and/or upper story of a building. (b) Parking Within Building. The area(s) of a building in which parking is permitted within the structure. (c) Occupied Space. The area(s) of a building that shall be designed as occupied space, defined as interior building space regularly occupied by the building users. It does not include storage areas, utility space, or parking. 4. Street Facade Requirements. The following explains the line item requirements for each Building Type Table within the fourth section entitled “Street Facade Requirements.” These requirements apply only to facades facing a public or private street right-of-way. The rear or interior side yard facades are not required to meet these standards unless otherwise stated. Table 10-21-4B (4) illustrates an example of a Street Facade Requirements Table from a typical Building Type. (a) Minimum Ground Story and Upper Floor Transparency. (Refer to Figure 10-21-4B (5)). The minimum amount of transparency on street facades with street frontage. i. Transparency is any glass in windows and/or doors, including any mullions, that is highly transparent with low reflectance. (i) Ground Story Transparency, when defined separately from the overall minimum transparency, shall be measured between two (2) feet and eight (8) feet from the base of the front facade. (ii) A general Minimum Transparency requirement shall be measured from floor to floor of each story. (b) Blank Wall Limitations. A restriction of the amount of windowless area permitted on a facade with street frontage. If required, the following shall both be met for each story: i. No rectangular area greater than thirty percent (30%) of a story’s facade, as measured from floor to floor, may be windowless; and ii. No horizontal segment of a story’s facade greater than fifteen (15) feet in width may be windowless. 5. Entrance Type. (a) Front Facade Entrance Type. The Entrance Type(s) permitted for the entrance(s) of a given Building Type. A mix of permitted Entrance Types may be utilized. Refer to Section 10-21-4I Entrance Types for definition of and additional requirements for each. (b) Principal Entrance Location. The facade on which the primary building entrance is to be located. Permitted Districts District A District B (e) Roof Type Requirements Permitted Roof Types Parapet, Pitched, Flat Tower PermittedEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLEEXAMPLE District A EXAMPLE District A District B EXAMPLE District B (e) Roof Type RequirementsEXAMPLE(e) Roof Type Requirements Permitted Roof TypesEXAMPLE Permitted Roof Types Area of Each Story. Measured from Center of Facade at Finished Ground Floor Height One Story. Blank Wall Limitations. Measuring Ground Floor Transparency on a Storefront Base. Measure percent of Ground Story Storefront Transparency between two and eight feet from the sidewalk DRAFTFigure 10-21-4B (5). Measuring Transparency.Figure 10-21-4B (4). Building Variety. Table 10-21-4B (5). Example Roof Type Requirements Table from a Typical Building Type. 10-21-4 Building Types (c) Number of Street Entrances. The minimum number of and maximum spacing between entrances on the ground floor building facade with street frontage. (d) Ground Story Vertical Divisions. The use of a vertically oriented expression line or form to divide the ground floor facade into increments no greater than the dimension shown in Figure 10-21-4I (1), as measured along the base of the facade, and extending a minimum of eighty percent (80%) from the average grade of the facade elevation to the interior ceiling. Elements may include a column, pilaster, or other continuous vertical ornamentation. (e) Horizontal Facade Divisions. The use of a horizontally oriented expression line or form to divide portions of the facade into horizontal divisions, extending a minimum of ninety percent (90%) of the full width of the facade. Elements may include a cornice, belt course, molding, string courses, or other continuous horizontal ornamentation a minimum of one and a half inch depth. (f) Facade Variety Requirements. Building design shall vary between designated vertical facade divisions, where required per the Building Type, and from adjacent buildings by the type of dominant material or color, scale, or orientation of that material and at least two of the following. Refer to Figure 10- 21-4B (5) for one illustration of this requirement. i. The proportion of recesses and projections. ii. The location of the entrance and window placement, unless storefronts are utilized. iii. Roof type, plane, or material, unless otherwise stated in the Building Type requirements. 6. Roof Type. The following explains the line item requirements for each Building Type Table in Sections 10-21-4C through 10-21-4H, within the fifth section entitled “Roof Types.” Table 10-21-4B (5) illustrates an example of a Roof Type Requirements Table from a typical Building Type. (a) Permitted Roof Type. The roof type(s) permitted for a given Building Type. Refer to Section 10-21-4J for more specific requirements. (b) Tower. A vertical building extension that may be permitted in conjunction with another roof type on certain Building Types. Refer to Section 10-21-4J. FINAL DRAFT March 2019 31 Measuring Transparency on Each Story with Slope. Each Window Opening Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code32 Permitted Districts S 1: Bridge Street S 2: Hydraulic Street S 3: Van Emmon Street S 4: ‘B’ Street (a) Building Siting Refer to Figures 10-21-4C (1) and 10-21-4C-(2) Multiple Principal Buildings Permitted 1 Minimum Front Lot Line Coverage 100% 2 75%90% 2 65% Occupation of Corner Required Front Build-to Zone 0’ to 5’0’ to 10’ Corner Build-to Zone 0’ to 5’0’ to 10’ Minimum Side Yard Setback 0’; 5’ if adjacent to other Building Type 5’ Minimum Rear Yard Setback 5’; 25’ if located adjacent to residential 3 Minimum Lot Width Maximum Building Width none none 16’ none Maximum Impervious Coverage Additional Semi-Pervious Coverage 95% 4 5% 80% 4 20% Parking & Loading Location Rear yard; existing developed sites require no add’l parking and/or loading facilities Rear Yard & Side Yard 5 Entry for Parking within Building Rear & Side Facades All Sides Vehicular Access none Alley; if no alley exists, 1 driveway per every 80’ of frontage is permitted off non-Primary street; if no side street, 1 driveway permitted off Primary Street; shared access is encouraged. (b) Height Refer to Figure 10-21-4C (3) Minimum Overall Height 2 stories 1 story Maximum Overall Height 6 stories (with min. 3’ setback at 3 stories) 4 stories Ground Story: Minimum Height Maximum Height 14’ 24’ 6 12’ 24’ 6 14’ 24’ 6 12’ 24’ 6 Upper Stories: Minimum Height Maximum Height 9’ 14’ (c) Uses Refer to Figure 10-21-4C (3) Ground Story Per Section 10-21-3 Uses; residential permitted provided that it is located at least 20’ from the front primary facade Upper Story Per Section 10-21-3 Uses Parking within Building Permitted fully in any basement and in rear of all floors Occupied Space 20’ deep on all full height floors from the front facade (d) Street Facade Requirements Refer to Figure 15.4C (4) Minimum Ground Story Transparency Measured between 2’ and 8’ above grade 50%30% Minimum Upper Story Transparency Street-Facing Stories 20%15% Front Facade Entrance Type Storefront, Elevated Storefront (permitted only on parcels in flood hazard areas per Section 18 of the City’s Code of Ordinances) Principal Entrance Location Front or Corner Facades Number of Street Entrances Minimum 1 for every 30’ or less of facade Minimum 1 for every 50’ or less of facade Minimum 1 for every 80’ or less of facade Ground Story Vertical Divisions One per every 20-40’ of facade width Horizontal Facade Divisions Within 3’ of top of ground story and the bottom of any fifth floor Within 3’ of top of ground story Facade Variety Required Refer to 10-21-4B(4)(h) for requirements.Every 40’ of facade width Every 50’ of facade width (e) Roof Type Requirements Refer to Figure 10-21-4C (4) Permitted Roof Types Parapet, Pitched, Flat Tower PermittedDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTRefer to Figure 10-21-4C (3)DRAFTRefer to Figure 10-21-4C (3)Refer to Figure 10-21-4C (3) 2 stories DRAFT2 stories Maximum Overall Height DRAFTMaximum Overall Height 6 stories (with DRAFT6 stories (with Ground Story: Minimum HeightDRAFTGround Story: Minimum Height Maximum HeightDRAFT Maximum Height Upper Stories: Minimum HeightDRAFTUpper Stories: Minimum Height Maximum HeightDRAFT Maximum Height (c) Uses DRAFT(c) Uses Refer to Figure 10-21-4C (3)DRAFTRefer to Figure 10-21-4C (3)Refer to Figure 10-21-4C (3) Ground StoryDRAFTGround Story 10-21-4 Building Types C. Downtown Commercial Building 1. Description & Intent. The Downtown Commercial Building is a building located at the front and corner property lines allowing easy access to passing pedestrians. Parking may be provided in the rear of the lot, internally in the building, or, in some cases, no off-street parking is required. Storefronts with large amounts of transparency and regularly spaced entrances off the street are utilized on the ground floor front facade. Ground floor uses are limited to those with high levels of pedestrian activity, such as retail, service, and office uses, with additional commercial, office, and/or residential uses in the upper stories. 2. Regulations. Regulations for the Downtown Commercial Building Type are defined in the adjacent table. Notes: 1 Each building shall meet all requirements of the Building Type. 2 A max. six (6) foot gap is allowed if it serves as a walkable passage. 3 If located adjacent to flood hazard area, refer to requirements of the Yorkville Stormwater Ordinance No. 2012-56. Refer to FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette maps for all flood hazard areas. 4 Maximum Impervious Coverage shall be applied only to all non-flood hazard areas. Refer to FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette maps for all flood hazard areas. 5 Lots wider than one hundred (100) feet are permitted one double-loaded aisle of parking (maximum width of seventy (70) feet), located perpendicular to the front lot line and shall meet a Front Lot Line Coverage of sixty percent (60%). 6 Eighteen (18) feet or more in height counts as two (2) stories towards maximum building height. b g i c a d h f e u o n m l q j k p r s t v MAIN STREET Front Property Line Rear Property Line Corner Side Property LineNon-Primary StreetPrimary Street Side Property Lineb g g i c c a a d h h f f e e Figure 10-21-4C (1): Building Siting. Street u Street Front Lot Lineo o o o nl m q j k p p p p p p r r s s s s s s ss ss ss t v h Front Property Line Rear Property Line Corner Side Property LineNon-Primary StreetPrimary Street Typical Site Plan.Site Plan with side parking (S 2 and S4 only). PRINCIPAL BUILDING PRINCIPAL BUILDING b i d h i Side Property LineFigure 10-21-4C (2): Building Siting.DRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTpDRAFTpDRAFTSite Plan with side parking (S 2 and S4 only).DRAFTSite Plan with side parking (S 2 and S4 only). Figure 10-21-4C (2): Building Siting.DRAFTFigure 10-21-4C (2): Building Siting. Figure 10-21-4C (3): Height & Use Requirements.Figure 10-21-4C (4): Street Facade Requirements. 10-21-4 Building Types FINAL DRAFT March 2019 33 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code34 Permitted Districts S 2: Hydraulic Street S 3: Van Emmon Street S 4: ‘B’ Street (a) Building Siting Refer to Figures 10-21-4D (1) and 10-21-4D (2) Multiple Principal Buildings Permitted 1 Minimum Front Lot Line Coverage 75% 50% Occupation of Corner Required Front Build-to Zone 5’ to 15’5’ to 20’ Corner Build-to Zone 0’ to 10’5’ to 20’ Minimum Side Yard Setback 5’10’ Minimum Rear Yard Setback 5’; 25’ if located adjacent to residential 2 Minimum Lot Width Maximum Building Width 16’ none Maximum Impervious Coverage Additional Semi-Pervious Coverage 65% 3 20% 75% 3 20% 65% 3 20% Parking & Loading Location Rear yard 4, Side Yard Entry for Parking within Building Rear & Side Facades Vehicular Access Alley; if no alley exists, 1 driveway per every 80’ of frontage is permitted off non-Primary street; if no side street, 1 driveway permitted off Primary Street; shared access is encouraged. (b) Height Refer to Figure 10-21-4D (3) Minimum Overall Height 1 story Maximum Overall Height 4 stories All Stories: Minimum Height Maximum Height 9’ 14’ (c) Uses Refer to Figure 10-21-4D (3). All Stories Per Section 10-21-3 Uses; residential dwelling allowed provided that it is located at least 20’ from the front primary facade Parking within Building Permitted fully in any basement and in rear of all floors Occupied Space 20’ deep on all full height floors from the front facade (d) Street Facade Requirements Refer to Figure 10-21-4D (4). Minimum Transparency Per each Story 20% Front Facade Entrance Type Stoop, Porch Principal Entrance Location Front facade or corner facade Number of Street Entrances Minimum 1 for every 100’ or less of facade Ground Story Vertical Divisions Every 60’ of facade width Horizontal Facade Divisions Within 3’ of the top of the ground story and any visible basement Facade Variety Required Refer to 10-21-4B(4)(h) for requirements.Every 50’ of facade width (e) Roof Type Requirements Refer to Figure 10-21-4D (4) Permitted Roof Types Parapet, pitched, flat Tower PermittedDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFT(b) Height DRAFT(b) Height Refer to Figure 10-21-4D (3)DRAFTRefer to Figure 10-21-4D (3) Minimum Overall Height DRAFTMinimum Overall Height Maximum Overall Height DRAFTMaximum Overall Height All Stories: Minimum Height DRAFTAll Stories: Minimum Height Maximum Height DRAFT Maximum Height (c) Uses DRAFT(c) Uses All StoriesDRAFTAll Stories 10-21-4 Building Types D. Downtown Living Building 1. Description & Intent. The Downtown Living Building Type is limited in terms of uses by the district within which it is located, generally housing office and/or residential uses. Similar to the Downtown Commercial Building, the Downtown Living building is intended to be built close to the front and corner property lines, but generally allows for more landscape space between the building and the street. Parking may be provided in the rear of the lot, internally in the building, or, in some cases, one double loaded aisle of parking is permitted in the interior or the side yard at the front lot line. 2. Regulations. Regulations for the Downtown Living Building Type are defined in the adjacent table. Notes: 1 Each building shall meet all requirements of the Building Type. 2 If located adjacent to flood hazard area, refer to requirements of the Yorkville Stormwater Ordinance No. 2012-56. Refer to FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette maps for all flood hazard areas. 3 Maximum Impervious Coverage shall be applied only to all non-flood hazard areas. Refer to FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette maps for all flood hazard areas. 4 Lots wider than one hundred (100) feet are permitted one double-loaded aisle of parking (maximum width of seventy (70) feet), located perpendicular to the front lot line and shall meet a Front Lot Line Coverage of sixty percent (60%). b g i c a d h f e n l q j k p r t m o s Front Property Line Rear Property Line Corner Side Property LineNon-Primary StreetPrimary Street Side Property LineFigure 10-21-4D (1): Building Siting. Typical Site Plan. b g i c a d h f e Front Property LineStreet k j q l pp p r s t n p n p n o n m n h b g c a d h f e h iFront Property Line Rear Property Line Corner Side Property LineNon-Primary StreetPrimary Street Side Property LineSite Plan with side parking (S 3 and S 4 only). m m m m ppp ppp ppp Street PRINCIPAL BUILDING PRINCIPAL BUILDING Figure 10-21-4D (2): Building Siting.DRAFTDRAFTDRAFTSite Plan with side parking (S 3 and S 4 only).DRAFTSite Plan with side parking (S 3 and S 4 only).DRAFTFigure 10-21-4D (2): Building Siting.DRAFTFigure 10-21-4D (2): Building Siting. 10-21-4 Building Types FINAL DRAFT March 2019 35 Figure 10-21-4D (3): Height & Use Requirements.Figure 10-21-4D (4): Street Facade Requirements. Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code36 Permitted Districts S 1: Bridge Street S 2: Hydraulic Street S 3: Van Emmon Street S 4: ‘B’ Street (a) Building Siting Refer to Figure 10-21-4E (1) Multiple Principal Buildings Refer to District Street Details Minimum Front Lot Line Coverage 60%50%40% Occupation of Corner Required Front Build-to Zone 5’ to 10’5’ to 20’ Corner Build-to Zone 5’ to 10’5’ to 25’5’ to 15’ Minimum Side Yard Setback 10’15’ Minimum Rear Yard Setback 25’ 2 Minimum Lot Width Maximum Building Width 25’ 50’ Maximum Impervious Coverage Additional Semi-Pervious Coverage 70% 3 15% 60% 3 15% Parking & Loading Location Rear yard; attached garages access off rear facade only. 4,5 Entry for Parking within Building Not Permitted on Primary Street Vehicular Access Alley; if no alley exists, 1 driveway permitted off non-Primary street; if no side street, 1 driveway permitted off Primary Street; shared access is encouraged. (b) Height Refer to Figure 10-21-4E (2) Minimum Overall Height none Maximum Overall Height 3.5 stories Minimum Ground Story Height 10’ (c) Uses Refer to Figure 10-21-4E (2) Ground Story Per Section 10-21-3 Uses Upper Stories Per Section 10-21-3 Uses Parking within Building Not Permitted on Primary Street Occupied Space 20’ deep on all full height floors from the front facade (d) Street Facade Requirements Refer to Figure 10-21-4E (3) Minimum Ground Story Transparency Measured between 2’ and 8’ above grade 40% 30% Minimum Transparency Upper Stories 15% Blank Wall Limitations Required per floor Front Facade Entrance Type Porch (Storefront, Elevated Storefront permitted only on parcels in flood hazard areas per Section 18 of the City’s Code of Ordinances; Stoop permitted with design review Principal Entrance Location Front or corner side facade Number of Street Entrances Minimum 1 per Building Ground Story Vertical Divisions Not required Horizontal Facade Divisions Within 3’ of the top of any visible basement Facade Variety Required Refer to 10-21-4B(4)(h) for requirements.Between adjacent buildings (e) Roof Type Requirements Refer to Figure 10-21-4E (3) Permitted Roof Types Pitched Tower PermittedDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTRefer to Figure 10-21-4E (2)DRAFTRefer to Figure 10-21-4E (2) 3.5 stories DRAFT3.5 stories Minimum Ground Story Height DRAFTMinimum Ground Story Height 10’DRAFT10’ Refer to Figure 10-21-4E (2)DRAFTRefer to Figure 10-21-4E (2) Upper StoriesDRAFTUpper Stories Parking within BuildingDRAFTParking within Building Occupied SpaceDRAFTOccupied SpaceDRAFT(d) Street Facade Requirements DRAFT(d) Street Facade Requirements 10-21-4 Building Types E. Cottage Commercial Building 1. Description & Intent. The Cottage Commercial Building combines characteristics of the Downtown Commercial Building Type with physical characteristics of a residential cottage, such as a pitched roof and a front stoop or porch. This lower-scale building has a pedestrian-friendly storefront, stoop, or porch entrance type with moderate transparency and a primary entrance that faces the street. Constructed with Setbacks similar to a residential cottage, this building typically has more landscape area than the Downtown Commercial Building Types. Parking is permitted in the rear of the lot or a side aisle (with conditions). The Cottage Commercial Building may contain a mix of uses, including retail, service, and office uses on the ground floor, with residential uses on upper floors. 2. Regulations. Regulations for the Cottage Commercial building type are defined in the adjacent table. Notes: 1 Each building shall meet all requirements of the Building Type. 2 If located adjacent to flood hazard area, refer to requirements of the Yorkville Stormwater Ordinance No. 2012-56. Refer to FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette maps for all flood hazard areas. 3 Maximum Impervious Coverage shall be applied only to all non-flood hazard areas. Refer to FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette maps for all flood hazard areas. 4 Lots wider than eighty (80) feet are permitted one single-loaded aisle of parking (maximum width of forty (40) feet), located perpendicular to the front lot line, and shall meet a Front Lot Line Coverage of fifty percent (50%). 5 Attached garages are considered part of the principal building and shall meet all setbacks. Detached garages shall meet all setbacks unless an alley is present. When an alley is present, detached garages shall have a minimum rear setback of five (5) feet. b g i c a d h f e u o n m l q j k p r s t Rear Property Line Corner Side Property LineNon-Primary StreetPrimary Street Side Property Lineb i c a d h f e e a f g h i d StreetStreet l k j m p o r ron s q t Front Property Line h h g Front Property Linen n o o ruPRINCIPAL BUILDINGPRINCIPAL BUILDINGDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTFigure 10-21-4E (2) Height & Use Requirements.Figure 10-21-4E (3). Street Facade Requirements. Figure 10-21-4E (1). Building Siting. 10-21-4 Building Types FINAL DRAFT March 2019 37 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code38 Permitted Districts S 1: Bridge Street S 2: Hydraulic Street S 3: Van Emmon Street S 4: ‘B’ Street S 5: ‘B’ Street Residential (a) Building Siting Refer to Figure 10-21-4F (1) Multiple Principal Buildings Refer to District Street Details Minimum Front Lot Line Coverage Refer to District Street Details Occupation of Corner Required Front Build-to Zone 0’ to 10’0’ to 15’Corner Build-to Zone Minimum Side Yard Setback 5’10’ Minimum Rear Yard Setback 5’; 25’ if located adjacent to residential 1 Minimum Lot Width Maximum Building Width 16’ none 30’ none Maximum Impervious Coverage Additional Semi-Pervious Coverage 70% 2 20% 70% 2 10% 50% 2 20% Parking & Loading Location Rear yard 3 Entry for Parking within Building Rear & Side Facades Vehicular Access Alley Alley; if no alley exists, 1 driveway is permitted per street frontage (b) Height Refer to Figure 10-21-4F (2) Minimum Overall Height 1 story Maximum Overall Height 6 stories (with min. 3’ setback at 3 stories) 4 stories 3 stories Ground Story: Minimum Height Maximum Height 14’ 24’ 4 12’ 24’ 4 14’ 24’ 4 12’ 24’ 4 12’ 18’ 4 Upper Stories: Minimum Height Maximum Height 9’ 14’ 9’ 12’ (c) Uses Refer to Figure 10-21-4F(2) All Stories Limited to uses in the Civic category and Entertainment Uses by Special Use. Refer to 15.3 Uses. Parking within Building Permitted fully in any basement and in rear of all floors Occupied Space 30’ deep on all full height floors from the front facade (d) Street Facade Requirements Refer to Figure 10-21-4F (3) Minimum Transparency Per each Story 12% Blank Wall Limitations None Front Facade Entrance Type None required Principal Entrance Location Front or corner Facade Number of Street Entrances 1 per each 150’ of front facade Ground Story Vertical Divisions none required Horizontal Facade Divisions none required Facade Variety Required Refer to 10-21-4B(4)(h) for requirements.none required (e) Roof Type Requirements Refer to Figure 10-21-4F (3) Permitted Roof Types Parapet, Pitched, Flat, Other Roofs with approval per 10-21-4J Pitched Tower PermittedDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTRefer to Figure 10-21-4F (2)DRAFTRefer to Figure 10-21-4F (2) 1 story DRAFT1 story Maximum Overall Height DRAFTMaximum Overall Height 6 stories DRAFT6 stories (with min. 3’ DRAFT(with min. 3’ DRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTGround Story: Minimum Height DRAFTGround Story: Minimum Height Maximum HeightDRAFT Maximum Height Upper Stories: Minimum HeightDRAFTUpper Stories: Minimum Height Maximum HeightDRAFT Maximum Height (c) Uses DRAFT(c) Uses Refer to Figure 10-21-4F(2)DRAFTRefer to Figure 10-21-4F(2)DRAFTAll StoriesDRAFTAll Stories 10-21-4 Building Types F. Civic Building 1. Description & Intent. The Civic Building Type is a more flexible Building Type intended only for civic and institutional types of uses. These buildings are distinctive within the community fabric created by the other Building Types. Parking is limited to the rear in most cases. The maximum heights of this Building Type depend on the district within which it is located. 2. Regulations. Regulations for the Civic Building Type are defined in the adjacent table. Notes: 1 If located adjacent to flood hazard area, refer to requirements of the Yorkville Stormwater Ordinance No. 2012-56. Refer to FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette maps for all flood hazard areas. 2 Maximum Impervious Coverage shall be applied only to all non-flood hazard areas. Refer to FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette maps for all flood hazard areas. 3 Lots wider than one hundred (100) feet are permitted one double-loaded aisle of parking (maximum width of seventy (70) feet), located perpendicular to the front lot line. 4 Eighteen (18) feet or more in height counts as two (2) stories towards maximum building height. b g i c d h f e s n m l q j k p r o a Street Front Lot Line Rear Property Line Corner Property LineStreetStreet Side Property Lineb g c d f e m n l o j k p Street s r a f i h Front Property Linel l l l m m m o o o o o o o o o o o o o o q PRINCIPAL BUILDING DRAFTDRAFTFigure 10-21-4F (2). Height & Use Requirements.Figure 10-21-4F (3). Street Facade Requirements. Figure 10-21-4F (1). Building Siting. 10-21-4 Building Types FINAL DRAFT March 2019 39 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code40 Permitted Districts S 3: Van Emmon Street S 4: ‘B’ Street S 5: ‘B’ Street Residential (a) Building Siting Refer to Figures 10-21-4G (1) and 10-21-4G (2) Multiple Principal Buildings Permitted 1 Minimum Front Lot Line Coverage 75% 2 70% 2 65% 2 Occupation of Corner Required Front Build-to Zone 5’ to 20’10’ to 20’10’ to 25’ Corner Build-to Zone 5’ to 10’10’ to 15’ Minimum Side Yard Setback 0’ per unit; 10’ between buildings’ 0’ per unit; 15’ between buildings’ Minimum Rear Yard Setback 15’, if alley present 5’20’, if alley present 5’ Minimum Unit Width Maximum Building Width 16’ per unit Maximum 8 units per building 16’ per unit Maximum 6 units per building; maximum 120’ width 18’ per unit Maximum 6 units per building; maximum 120’ width Maximum Impervious Coverage Additional Semi-Pervious Coverage 65% 3 20% 60% 3 20% 50% 3 20% Parking & Garage Location Rear yard; attached garages access off rear facade only. 4 Vehicular Access Alley; if no alley exists, one driveway is permitted per building (b) Height Refer to Figure 10-21-4G (3) Minimum Overall Height 1 story Maximum Overall Height 4 stories 3.5 stories Minimum Ground Floor Height:12’ (c) Uses Refer to Figure 10-21-4G (3) All Stories Residential only Parking within Building Permitted fully in any basement and in rear of all floors Occupied Space 30’ deep on all full height floors from the front facade (d) Street Facade Requirements Refer to Figure 10-21-4G (4) Minimum Transparency per each Story 15%12% Front Facade Entrance Type Stoop, Porch Principal Entrance Location Front or Corner Side Facade Number of Street Entrances 1 per unit Ground Story Vertical Divisions none required Horizontal Facade Divisions none required Facade Variety Required Refer to 10-21-4B(4)(h) for requirements.Between adjacent buildings (e) Roof Type Requirements Refer to Figure 10-21-4G (4) Permitted Roof Types Parapet, Pitched, Flat Tower PermittedDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTParking & Garage Location DRAFTParking & Garage Location Vehicular Access DRAFTVehicular Access DRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFT(b) Height DRAFT(b) Height Refer to Figure 10-21-4G (3)DRAFTRefer to Figure 10-21-4G (3) Minimum Overall Height DRAFTMinimum Overall Height Maximum Overall Height DRAFTMaximum Overall Height Minimum Ground Floor Height:DRAFTMinimum Ground Floor Height: (c) Uses DRAFT(c) Uses All StoriesDRAFTAll Stories Parking within BuildingDRAFTParking within Building G. Attached Building 1. Description & Intent. The Attached Building is a building comprised of multiple vertical units, each with its own entrance to the street. This Building Type may be organized as townhouses or rowhouses. Parking is required to be located in the rear yard and may be incorporated either into a detached garage or in an attached garaged accessed from the rear of the building. However, when the garage is located within the building, a minimum level of occupied space is required on the front facade to ensure that the street facade is active. 2. Regulations. Regulations for the Attached Building Type are defined in the adjacent table. Notes: 1 For the purposes of the Attached Building, a building consists of a series of units. When permitted, multiple buildings may be located on a lot within the minimum space between them. However, each building shall meet all requirements of the Building Type. 2 Each building shall meet the front lot line coverage requirement, except one of every five (5) units may front a courtyard with a minimum width of thirty (30) feet. The courtyard shall be defined on three (3) sides by units. 3 Maximum Impervious Coverage shall be applied only to all non-flood hazard areas. Refer to FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette maps for all flood hazard areas. 4 Attached garages are considered part of the principal building and shall meet all setbacks. Detached garages shall meet all setbacks unless an alley is present. When an alley is present, detached garages shall have a minimum rear setback of five (5) feet. 10-21-4 Building Types b g i c a d h f e s n l q j k p r m o Front Lot Line Rear Property Line Corner Property LineStreetStreet Side Property LineAlley Rowhouse Front Lot Line Rear Property Line Corner Property LineStreetStreet Side Property LineAlley Street b b g i i c c a a d d h h f f e e r rm m m m l o j k n n p pp p p pp p p q s Street g PRINCIPAL BUILDINGPRINCIPAL BUILDING unitunitunitunitunitunitunitunitunitunitunitunitunitunitpDRAFTDRAFTDRAFT Figure 10-21-4G (3): Height & Use Requirements.Figure 10-21-4G (4): Street Facade Requirements. Figure 10-21-4G (1): Building Siting.Figure 10-21-4G (2): Building Siting. 10-21-4 Building Types FINAL DRAFT March 2019 41 Site Plan without Rear Yard Site Plan with Rear Yard Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code42 Permitted Districts S 4: ‘B’ Street S 5: ‘B’ Street Residential (a) Building Siting Refer to Figure 10-21-4H (1) Multiple Principal Buildings Permitted 1 Minimum Front Lot Line Coverage 50% 2 40% Occupation of Corner Required Front Build-to Zone 10’ to 20’10’ to 25’ Corner Build-to Zone 10’ to 20’10’ to 25’ Minimum Side Yard Setback 5’7.5’ Minimum Rear Yard Setback 35’, if alley present 5’ Minimum Lot Width Maximum Lot Width 30’ 50’ 30’ 70’ Maximum Impervious Coverage Additional Semi-Pervious Coverage 60% 3 20% 50% 3 20% Parking & Garage Location Rear yard; attached garages access off rear or side facade only. 4 Vehicular Access Alley; if no alley exists, one driveway is permitted per building (b) Height Refer to Figure 10-21-4H (2) Minimum Overall Height 1 story Maximum Overall Height 3.5 stories All Stories: Minimum Height Maximum Height 9’ 14’ (c) Uses Refer to Figure 10-21-4H (2) All Stories Residential only Parking within Building Permitted Occupied Space 30’ (d) Street Facade Requirements Refer to Figure 10-21-4H (3) Minimum Transparency per each Story 12% Front Facade Entrance Type Stoop, porch Principal Entrance Location Front or side facade Number of Street Entrances Any Ground Story Vertical Divisions None required Horizontal Facade Divisions None required Facade Variety Required Refer to 10-21-4B(4)(h) for requirements.Between adjacent buildings (e) Roof Type Requirements Refer to Figure 10-21-4H (3) Permitted Roof Types Parapet, Pitched, Flat Pitched Tower Not permittedDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTDRAFTMaximum Overall Height DRAFTMaximum Overall Height All Stories: Minimum Height DRAFTAll Stories: Minimum Height Maximum Height DRAFT Maximum Height (c) Uses DRAFT(c) Uses Refer to Figure 10-21-4H (2)DRAFTRefer to Figure 10-21-4H (2) All Stories DRAFTAll Stories Parking within BuildingDRAFTParking within Building Occupied SpaceDRAFTOccupied Space (d) Street Facade Requirements DRAFT(d) Street Facade Requirements 10-21-4 Building Types H. Yard Building 1. Description & Intent. The Yard Building is a residential building, incorporating a landscaped yard surrounding all sides of the building. Parking and garages are limited to the rear only with preferred access from an alley. 2. Regulations. Regulations for the Yard Building Type are defined in the adjacent table. Notes 1 Each building shall meet all requirements of the Building Type. 2 When multiple buildings are located on a single lot, the buildings shall collectively meet the front lot line coverage requirement. Buildings located internal to the lot may be arranged with a courtyard or bungalow court that is a minimum of twenty (20) feet in width. The width of the courtyard shall be exempt from minimum front lot line coverage requirements. The courtyard or bungalow court shall be defined on three (3) sides by units. This layout shall not be allowed on corner lots, only lots internal to a block segment. 3 Maximum Impervious Coverage shall be applied only to all non-flood hazard areas. Refer to FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette maps for all flood hazard areas. 4 Attached garages are considered part of the principal building and shall meet all setbacks. Detached garages shall meet all setbacks unless an alley is present. When an alley is present, detached garages shall have a minimum rear setback of five (5) feet. b g i c a d h f e n l q j k p r m o Street Front Lot Line Rear Property Line Corner Property LineStreetStreet Side Property LineStreet b g g h i a d f e e q l l l l n m m o o oo o o o p r j k b c PRINCIPAL BUILDINGPRINCIPAL BUILDINGh DRAFTDRAFTDRAFTFigure 10-21-4H (2). Height and Use Requirements.Figure 10-21-4H (3). Street Facade Requirements. Figure 10-21-4H (1). Building Siting. 10-21-4 Building Types FINAL DRAFT March 2019 43 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code44 Expression Line Sidewalk Transparency Ground Story Elevation Entry Base Expression Line Street Sidewalk StorefrontBasementEntry Base Secondary Sidewalk Landscape Area or Visible Basement Ramp Down to Grade Interior Ceiling Vertical Division DRAFTFigure 10-21-4I (1). Storefront Entrance Type.Figure 10-21-4I (2). Elevated Storefront Entrance Type. 10-21-4 Building Types I. Entrance Types Entrance type standards apply to the ground story and visible basement of front facades of all Building Types as defined in this Section. Refer to the Building Type Table Requirements, Sections 10-21-4C through 10-21-4H. 1. General. The following provisions apply to all entrance types. (a) Intent. To guide the design of the ground story of all buildings to relate appropriately to pedestrians on the street. Treatment of other portions of the building facades is detailed in each Building Type standard (refer to Building Types 10-21-4C through 10-21-4H). (b) Applicability. The entire ground story street-facing facade(s) of all buildings shall meet the requirements of at least one (1) of the permitted entrance types, unless otherwise stated. (c) Measuring Transparency. Refer to Section 10-21-4B Explanation of Building Type Table Standards, for information on measuring building transparency. (d) Visible Basements. Visible basements, permitted by entrance type, are optional. The visible basement shall be a maximum of one-half the height of the tallest story. 2. Storefront Entrance Type. Refer to Figure 10-21-4I (1). The Storefront entrance type is a highly transparent ground story treatment designed to serve primarily as the display area and primary entrance for retail or service uses. (a) Transparency. Minimum transparency is required per Building Type. (b) Elevation. Storefront elevation shall be between zero (0) and one (1) foot above street sidewalk. (c) Visible Basement. A visible basement is not permitted. (d) Horizontal Facade Division. Horizontally define the ground story facade from the upper stories. (e) Entrance. All entries shall be recessed from the front facade closest to the street. i. Recess shall be a minimum of three (3) feet and a maximum of eight (8) feet deep, measured from the portion of the front facade closest to the street. ii. When the recess falls behind the front build-to zone, the recess shall be no wider than eight (8) feet. 3. Elevated Storefront Entrance Type. Refer to Figure 10-21-4I (2). The Elevated Storefront entrance type is a highly transparent ground story treatment similar to the Storefront, but permitted to be elevated above the sidewalk for buildings located on parcels with flood hazard areas. (a) Transparency. Minimum transparency is required per Building Type. (b) Elevation. Storefront elevation may be a half story above the street sidewalk elevation. (c) Visible Basement. A visible basement is permitted and does not require Occupied Space. (d) Horizontal Facade Division. Horizontally define the ground story facade from the upper stories and any Visible Basement from the ground story. (e) Entrance. All entries shall be located off a secondary walk along the building face within the build-to zone. i. The secondary sidewalk shall be elevated above and essentially parallel to the street sidewalk to provide Entry Optional Visible Basement Expression Line Vertical Divisions Sidewalk Transparency Ground Story Elevation Entry Sidewalk DRAFTFigure 10-21-4I (3). Stoop Entrance Type.Figure 10-21-4I (4). Porch Entrance Type. 10-21-4 Building Types continuous walking along the facade of the building. ii. The secondary sidewalk shall be continuous along the facade of the building and shall connect to the street sidewalk by steps and ramps every fifty (50) feet. iii. The secondary sidewalk shall connect to any other adjacent developments secondary sidewalks, when feasible. Drive crossings shall be of the same material as the secondary walk. iv. The transition between the secondary sidewalk and street sidewalk shall include landscape, patios, and connecting walks. v. The visible basement shall be located a minimum of five (5) feet from the street sidewalk to allow softening of the transition. vi. The street and the secondary sidewalks shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in width. 4. Stoop Entrance Type. Refer to Figure 10-21-4I (3). A stoop is an unroofed, open platform. (a) Transparency. Minimum transparency is required per Building Type. (b) Stoop Size. Stoops shall be a minimum of five (5) feet deep by six (6) feet wide. (c) Elevation. Stoop elevation shall be located a maximum of two (2) feet six (6) inches (2’ 6”) above the sidewalk without visible basement and a maximum of four (4) feet six (6) inches (4’ 6”) above the sidewalk with a visible basement. (d) Visible Basement. A visible basement is permitted and shall be separated from the ground story by an expression line. (e) Entrance. All entries shall be located off a stoop. The stoop may be continuous along the facade of the building. (f) Landscape Area. A minimum five (5) foot wide landscape area is required within the build-to zone along the length of this entrance type with the exception of walks accessing the building. 5. Porch Entrance Type. Refer to Figure 10-21-4I (4). A porch is a raised, roofed platform that may or may not be enclosed on all sides. If enclosed, the space shall not be climate controlled. (a) Transparency. i. Minimum transparency per Building Type is required. ii. If enclosed, a minimum of forty percent (40%) of the enclosed porch shall be comprised of highly transparent, low reflectance windows. (b) Porch Size. The porch shall be a minimum of five (5) feet deep and eight (8) feet wide. (c) Elevation. Porch elevation shall be located a maximum of two (2) feet six (6) inches (2’ 6”) above the sidewalk without a visible basement and a maximum of four (4) feet six (6) inches (4’ 6”) above the sidewalk with a visible basement. (d) Visible Basement. A visible basement is permitted. (e) Height. Porch may be two (2) stories to provide a balcony on the second floor. (f) Entrance. All entries shall be located off a porch. FINAL DRAFT March 2019 45 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code46 Cap Type & Roof Height Low Pitched Roof Roof Type (Hip Roof) Roof Slope upper floor Upper Floor Expression Line Cap Height Pitched Roof Type (Gable Roof) Roof Slope Upper Floor Cap Type & Roof HeightDRAFT Figure 10-21-4J (1). Parapet Roof Type Figure 10-21-4J (2). Pitched Roof Type 10-21-4 Building Types J. Roof Types Roof type standards apply to the roof and cap of all Building Types as defined in this Section. Refer to the Building Type Table Requirements, Sections 10-21-4C through 10-21-4H. 1. General Provisions. The following provisions apply to all roof types. (a) Intent. To guide the design of the cap of all buildings. (b) Applicability. All buildings shall meet the requirements of one of the roof types permitted for the Building Type. (c) Measuring Height. Refer to Section 10-21-4B for information on measuring building height. (d) Other roof types. Other building caps not listed as a specific type may be requested with the following requirements: i. The roof type shall not create additional occupiable space beyond that permitted by the Building Type. ii. The shape of the Roof Type shall be significantly different from those defined in this section 10-21-4J, i.e. a dome, spire, vault. iii. The building shall warrant a separate status within the community from the fabric of surrounding buildings, with a correspondence between the form of the roof type and the meaning of the building use. 2. Parapet Roof Type. Refer to Figure 10-21-4J (1). A parapet is a low wall projecting above a building’s roof along the perimeter of the building. It can be utilized with a flat or low pitched roof and also serves to limit the view of roof-top mechanical systems from the street. (a) Parapet Height. Height is measured from the top of the upper story to the top of the parapet. i. Minimum height is two (2) feet with a maximum height of six (6) feet. ii. The parapet shall be high enough to screen the roof and any roof appurtenances from view of the street(s). (b) Horizontal Expression Lines. An expression line shall define the parapet from the upper stories of the building and shall also define the top of the cap. (c) Occupied Space. Occupied space shall not be incorporated behind this roof type. 3. Pitched Roof Type. Refer to Figure 10-21-4J (2). This roof type has a sloped or pitched roof. Slope is measured with the vertical rise divided by the horizontal span or run. (a) Pitch Measure. The roof may not be sloped less than a 4:12 (rise:run) or more than 16:12. i. Slopes less than 4:12 are permitted to occur on second story or higher roofs. Refer to Figure 10-21-4J (2). (b) Configurations. i. Hipped, gabled, and combination of hips and gables with or without dormers are permitted. ii. Butterfly roofs (inverted gable roof) are permitted with a maximum height of eight (8) feet, inclusive of overhang. iii. Gambrel and mansard roofs are not permitted. (c) Parallel Ridge Line. A gabled end or perpendicular ridge line shall occur at least every one hundred (100) feet of roof when the ridge line runs parallel to the front lot line. Refer to Figure 10-21-4J (3). (d) Roof Height. Roofs without occupied space and/or dormers shall have a maximum height on street-facing facades equal to the maximum floor height permitted for the Building Type. (e) Occupied Space. Occupied space may be incorporated behind this roof type. Allowable Cap Type Tower Width Cap Eave Thickness Eave DepthVertical Wall Plane Tower Height Expression Line Upper Fl o o r Parallel Ridge Line with Gable Roof Slope Upper Floor Cap Type & Roof Height DRAFTDRAFTFigure 10-21-4J (4). Tower Figure 10-21-4J (3). Parallel Ridge Line Figure 10-21-4J (5). Flat Roof Type 10-21-4 Building Types 4. Flat Roof Type. Refer to Figure 10-21-4J (5), Flat Roof Type. This roof type has a flat roof with overhanging eaves. (a) Configuration. Roofs with no visible slope are acceptable. Eaves are recommended on all street facing facades. (b) Eave Depth. Eave depth is measured from the building facade to the outside edge of the eave. Eaves shall have a depth of at least fourteen (14) inches. (c) Eave Thickness. Eave thickness is measured at the outside edge of the eave, from the bottom of the eave to the top of the eave. Eaves shall be a minimum of eight (8) inches thick. (d) Interrupting Vertical Walls. Vertical walls may interrupt the eave and extend above the top of the eave with no discernible cap. i. No more than one-half of the front facade can consist of an interrupting vertical wall. ii. Vertical walls shall extend no more than four (4) feet above the top of the eave. (e) Occupied Space. Occupied space shall not be incorporated behind this roof type. (f) No mechanical equipment on roof shall be visible from the adjacent sidewalk. 5. Towers. Refer to Figure 10-21-4J (4). A tower is a rectilinear or cylindrical, vertical element, that shall be used with other roof types. (a) Quantity. All Building Types, with the exception of the Civic Building, are limited to one (1) tower per building. (b) Tower Height. Maximum height, measured from the top of the parapet or eave to the top of the tower, is the equivalent of the height of one (1) upper floor of the building to which the tower is applied. (c) Tower Width. Maximum width along all facades is one-third the width of the front facade or thirty (30) feet, whichever is less. (d) Occupied Space. Towers may be occupied by the same uses allowed in upper stories of the Building Type to which it is applied. (e) Application. May be combined with all other roof types. (f) Tower Cap. The tower may be capped by the parapet, pitched, low pitched, or flat roof roof types, or the spire may cap the tower. FINAL DRAFT March 2019 47 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code48DRAFTDRAFTDRAFTFigure 10-21-4K (1). Primary Materials.Figure 10-21-4K (2). Roof Materials. 10-21-4 Building Types K. Additional Design Requirements The following outlines the district design requirements that affect a building’s appearance and district cohesiveness. They improve the physical quality of buildings, enhance the pedestrian experience, and protect the character of the neighborhood. 1. Materials and Color. (a) Primary Facade Materials. Eighty percent (80%) of each street facade shall be constructed of primary materials. Street facade materials shall continue around the corner a minimum depth of twenty (20) feet onto the side facade. i. Permitted primary building materials include high quality, durable, natural materials, such as stone, brick; wood lap siding; fiber cement board lapped, shingled, or panel siding; glass. Other high quality synthetic materials may be approved during the site plan process with an approved sample and examples of successful, high quality local installations. Refer to Figure 10-21-4K (1). (b) Secondary Facade Materials. Secondary materials are limited to details and accents and include gypsum reinforced fiber concrete for trim and cornice elements; metal for beams, lintels, trim, and ornamentation, and exterior architectural metal panels and cladding. i. Exterior Insulation and Finishing Systems (EIFS) is permitted on upper floor facades only. (c) Roof Materials. Acceptable roof materials include three hundred (300) pound or better, dimensional asphalt composite shingles, wood shingles and shakes, metal tiles or standing seam, slate, and ceramic tile. “Engineered” wood or slate may be approved during the site plan process with an approved sample and examples of successful, high quality local installations. Refer to Figure 10-21-4K (2). (d) Color. Main building colors shall utilize any historic palettes from any major paint manufacturer. Other colors may be utilized or details and accents, not to exceed a total area larger than ten percent (10%) of the facade surface area. (e) Appropriate Grade of Materials. Commercial quality doors, windows, and hardware shall be used on all ground floor Building Types with the exception of the Attached Building and the Yard Building. Refer to Figure 10-21-4K (3). 2. Windows, Awnings, and Shutters. (a) Windows. All upper story windows on all historic, residential, and mixed use buildings shall be recessed, and either casement or double hung. Percent of transparency is required per Building Type. Horizontal or vertical strip windows, tinted or reflective glass, and glass block (Figure 10-21-4K (4)) are prohibited on street facades. (b) Security Grills. Grills shall be fully retractable and completely within the interior of the building and inconspicuous to the Primary Materials: Brick Primary Materials: Stone Roof Materials: Ceramic Tile Roof Materials: Metal Roof Materials: Asphalt Composite Shingles Primary Materials: Painted Wood DRAFTDRAFTDRAFTFigure 10-21-4K (3).Commercial Grade Doors & Windows. Figure 10-21-4K (5).Security Grills. Figure 10-21-4K (4).Windows. Figure 10-21-4K (6). Awnings. 10-21-4 Building Types extent possible. Exterior bars are prohibited on any window. Refer to Figure 10-21-4K (5). (c) Awnings. All awnings shall be canvas or metal. Plastic awnings and canopy awnings that extend from the front facade into the right-of-way are prohibited. Awning types and colors for each building face shall be coordinated. Refer to Figure 10-21-4K (6). (d) Shutters. If installed, shutters, whether functional or not, shall be sized for the windows. If closed, the shutters shall not be too small for complete coverage of the window. Shutters shall be wood. “Engineered” wood may be approved during the site plan process with an approved sample and examples of successful, high quality local installations. 3. Rear Parking Facade Design. The following applies in all locations where a public building entrance occurs on the rear facade adjacent to a parking lot. Refer to Figure 15.4K (7). (a) Entrance Type. An Entrance Type shall be utilized for a minimum of twenty (20) feet of rear facade. Refer to 10-21- 4I(2)-(5). FINAL DRAFT March 2019 49 Prohibited: Residential Grade Doors on Commercial Buildings. Permitted: Commercial Grade Doors & Windows on Commercial Buildings. Prohibited: Glass block windows on front facade. Prohibited: Exterior grills and bars.Permitted: Fully retractable, interior security grills. Permitted Awnings: Metal (left) and Canvas (right) Prohibited Awnings: Canopy awnings that extend from the front facade into the right-of-way Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code50DRAFTDRAFTFigure 10-21-4K (8). Balconies Integral to Facade. Figure 10-21-4K (7).Rear Parking Facade Design. 15.4 Building Types (b) Transparency Requirement. Public building entrance facade area, minimum twenty (20) feet wide, shall utilize one of the following: i. When the Storefront Entrance Type is utilized, a minimum forty five percent (45%) transparency is required for the ground floor facade entrance, and the door shall be a minimum of forty five percent (45%) transparent. ii. When any other Entrance Type is utilized, the minimum transparency required for upper floors of the street facade shall apply to the rear ground floor entrance area, and the door shall be a minimum of forty five percent (45%) transparent. (c) Awnings and signage are encouraged. 4. Balconies. The following applies in all locations where balconies are incorporated into the facade design facing any street or parking lot. Refer to Figure 10-21-4K (8). (a) Size. Balconies shall be a minimum of six (6) feet deep and five (5) feet wide. (b) Connection to Building. Balconies shall be integral to the facade at the street line. Balconies on stepbacked stories shall be independently secured and unconnected to other balconies. (c) Facade Coverage. A maximum of forty percent (40%) of the front and corner side facades, as calculated separately, may be covered with balconies, including street-facing railing and balcony structure. Front Facade Example.Rear Facade Example. DRAFT10-21-4 Building Types This page intentionally left blank FINAL DRAFT March 2019 51 Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code52DRAFT10-21-5 Site Development Standards Land Use Bicycle Spaces Multifamily 1 per 2 Vehicular Spaces for buildings with 8+ units Civic/Institutional 1 per 10 Vehicular Spaces, min. of 4 Retail 1 per 10 Vehicular Spaces Services 1 per 10 Vehicular Spaces Office 1 per 10 Vehicular Spaces Land Use Vehicle Spaces Residential (Studio and 1 bedroom)1 per unit Residential (2 or more bedrooms)1.5 per unit Civic/Institutional max. 2 per 1,000 square feet Retail/Services (less than 8,000 square feet, excluding Restaurants) no min. or max. parking requirements Retail/Services (8,000 square feet or more, excluding Restaurants) max. 2 per 1,000 square feet Restaurants max. 4 per 1,000 square feet Office max. 2 per 1,000 square feet Table 10-21-5B (1). Required Vehicle Parking. Table 10-21-5B (1). Required Bicycle Parking. A. Signage 1. General Requirements. Refer to Section 10-20 of the Yorkville City Code for all signage regulations applicable to the Downtown Overlay Districts. 2. Revisions to the Signage Regulations. The following revises Section 10-20 of the Yorkville City Code specific to the S Districts. (a) Freestanding Low Monument Signs. (Refer to Section 10-20- 4) Low Monument Signs are permitted only in the S 4 District. B. Parking Requirements 1. Applicability. This section shall apply to all new development and changes in use or intensity of use for existing development in any S Districts. 2. General Requirements. Off-street parking spaces shall be provided in conformance with Section 10-16 Off-Street Parking and Loading Regulations, unless revised in this Section 10-21-5B. (a) Required Vehicle Parking. The Required Vehicle Parking Table 10-21-5B (1) indicates the maximum vehicle parking ratio for a given use. 3. Parking Credits. Vehicular parking standards within Section 10-16 may be reduced by achieving one or all of the following credits. (a) On-Street Parking Credit. For all non-residential uses, on- street parking spaces that meet the following shall be credited against the parking requirement. i. Spaces shall be designated on-street parking available twenty four (24) hours of every day. ii. On-street space located a minimum of fifty percent (50%) adjacent to the property line of the lot. (b) Public Parking Credit. For all non-residential uses, public parking spaces located within six hundred and sixty (660) feet of any property line may be credited against the parking requirement at a rate of one credit for every three public parking spaces. (c) Car-Share Parking Credit. The vehicular parking requirements can be reduced with the inclusion of car-share parking spaces as follows. i. Per each car-share parking space provided, required parking spaces shall be reduced by four (4) spaces. ii. Required parking spaces may be reduced up to forty percent (40%). iii. Approval. Applicant must provide documentation of an agreement with a car-share company. If this agreement should terminate at any point, applicant shall be required to provide parking as otherwise required herein. (d) Shared Parking. Required Parking may be reduced to the lower amount if at least eighty percent (80%) of non- residential parking is available as publicly shared parking. Otherwise, the higher standard parking requirement shall apply. (e) Other Parking Reductions. Additional reductions may be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission with the submittal of a parking study illustrating the reduction. 4. Bicycle Parking. (a) Required Bicycle Parking. The Required Bicycle Parking Table 10-21-5B (2) indicates the minimum bicycle parking ratio for a given use. i. Bicycle parking is not required for uses not listed. ii. Bicycle parking is not required for uses less than 2,500 square feet in size. iii. No Use, other than Civic is required to accommodate more than twenty (20) bicycles. (b) Bicycle Parking Dimensions. i. Required bicycle parking spaces shall have minimum dimensions of two (2) feet in width and six (6) feet in length. ii. An aisle a minimum of five (5) feet wide shall be provided behind bicycle parking facilities to allow for maneuvering. iii. A minimum of two (2) feet shall be provided beside each parked bicycle to allows access. This access may be shared by adjacent bicycles. iv. Racks shall be installed a minimum of two (2) feet from any wall or other obstruction. FINAL DRAFT March 2019 53DRAFT10-21-5 Site Development Standards Frontage Buffer Requirements Buffer Depth & Location 1 Depth 7’ Location on Site Between street facing property line and vehicular areas 2 Buffer Landscape Requirements Uses & Materials Uses and materials other than those indicated are prohibited in the buffer Shade Trees Medium or large shade tree with full, spreading canopies required at least every 40’; Locate on the street side of the fence; Spacing should alternate with street trees Hedge Required continuous hedge on street side of fence, between shade trees & in front of parking areas Hedge Composition Individual shrubs with a minimum width of 24”, spaced no more than 36” on center Existing Vegetation May be credited toward buffer area Fence Location 2’ from back of curb of vehicular area Materials Non-galvanized steel or painted PVC; Masonry Columns (maximum width 2’6”) and Low Wall (maximum 18” height) permitted Minimum Height 3’ for Steel or Painted PVC Maximum Height 4’ for Steel or Painted PVC, 18” for Low Wall Colors Black, gray, or dark green for Steel or Painted PVC Opacity Minimum 30%; Maximum 60% for Steel or Painted PVC Gate/Opening One gate permitted per street frontage; Opening width maximum 6’ Notes: 1 This screening requirement does not prohibit the installation of or provision for openings necessary for allowable access drives and walkways connecting to the public sidewalk. 2 In Front and Corner Yards, when the parking area is located adjacent to any building on the lot, the buffer must be located so that it aligns with or is behind the face of the adjacent building back to the vehicular area. The area between the buffer and the property line must be landscaped. Shade Tree. Hedge. Street Tree. Fence. 7’ Buffer. Shade Tree. Street Tree. Hedge.parking areasidewalkcurbFront Buffer Plan. Front Buffer Section.buildingalign with building faceProperty LineLocation. Optional Fence. Figure 10-21-5C (1). Frontage Buffer Plan and Section. Table 10-21-5C (1). Frontage Buffer Requirements. C. Landscape 1. General Requirements. Refer to Section 10-17 Fencing and Screening for all landscaping and screening requirements. 2. Build-to Zones and Setbacks. All build-to zone and setback areas not covered by building shall contain either landscape, patio space, or sidewalk space. (a) Driveways are permitted to cross the front and corner build-to zone and rear setbacks perpendicularly at a maximum of twenty five (25) feet in width. (b) Driveways may encroach upon the side setbacks longitudinally on parcels fifty (50) feet or less in width. (c) Parking lots shall not encroach upon any setbacks. Side and rear yard parking lots shall not be located closer to the front or corner lot line than the building. (c) Location. Bicycle parking should be located within fifty (50) feet of the entrance of the Use. i. Indoor or outdoor spaces are permitted, provided they are located on the lot with which they are associated. ii. Bicycle parking facilities shall be separated from vehicular parking areas to protect parked bicycles from damage. The separation may be accomplished through grade separation, distance or physical barrier, such as curbs, wheel stops, poles or other similar features. (d) Racks and Structures. Racks and structures shall be provided for each unprotected parking space, and shall be designed to accommodate both chain and U-shaped locking devices supporting the bicycle frame at two (2) points. 3. Frontage Buffer Requirements. Refer to Figure 10-21-5C (1). The following additional requirements are specific to the S Districts and is in addition to information within Section 10-17 Fencing and Screening guidelines. (a) Intent. To lessen the visual impact of parking areas visible from the street. (b)General Applicability. Applies to properties in all S Districts where a parking area is located adjacent to a right-of-way. (c) Exceptions. Parking areas along alleys, except when a residential district is located across the alley. Single and two family residences are also excepted. Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code54DRAFT10-21-5 Site Development Standards Tree Size Type Soil Volume (cubic ft) Soil Surface Area (sq ft) with 2.5’ Soil Depth Permeable Surface Area Requirement (sq ft) Medium 2,852 1141 (approx. 34’ x 34’)225 (15’ x 15’) Large 6,532 2681 (approx. 50’ x 50’)400 (20’ x 20’)Travel Lane Parking Lane Side- walk Right-of-Way Travel Lane Parking Lane Side- walk Parkway ParkwayBike Lane Bike Lane Ped RealmVehicular Realm Ped Realm PlantingorFurnishings Zone Figure 10-21-5D (1). Typical Right-of-Way Elements.Table 10-21-5D (1). Minimum Recommended Soil Volumes and Permeable Area per Planted Tree. D. Street Guidelines 1. General Street Guidelines. The following guidelines should apply to all new streets within S Districts with the intent of creating pedestrian oriented, multimodal streets. (a) Typical Street Elements. All street rights-of-way should include the following vehicular and pedestrian realm considerations. Refer to Figure 10-21-5D (1). (1) Vehicular Realm. The vehicular realm is comprised of the travel lanes, bicycle lanes, and parking lanes. (2) Pedestrian Realm. The pedestrian realm is comprised of pedestrian facilities, such as sidewalk. A buffer area that serves to buffer pedestrians or bicyclists from the movements of higher speed vehicles in the vehicular realm shall consist of one (1) of the following: (i) Landscape Zone. A landscape area between the back of curb to the sidewalk in which street trees, stormwater swales, lighting, and signage may be located. Typically used adjacent to residential ground floor uses. (ii) Furnishings Zone. A hardscape area that extends from the sidewalk to the back of curb, in which street trees, street furniture, lighting, and signage may be located. Typically used adjacent to commercial or office ground floor uses. (b) Bicycle Facilities. Bicycle facilities, such as dedicated lanes and dedicated shared lanes should be included on any streets based on the City’s bicycle plan. New streets within S districts shall utilize shared lanes. A shared lane refers to a street that does not have bicycle lanes or a designated shared lane, but the speed and configuration of the street is such that bicycles could comfortably share lanes with traffic. (c) Vehicular On-Street Parking. On-street parking, whether parallel or diagonal, shall be included according to the District Street Details for that street. 2. Street Trees. Street trees are required along all existing and new street frontages. (a) All planting material requirements within Landscaping and Screening Guidelines shall be utilized. (b) Street trees shall be located in either a Landscape Zone (within a planting bed or lawn) or a Furnishings Zone (in trees wells with grate as required). (c) Permeable Surface. For each tree preserved or planted, a minimum amount of permeable surface area is recommended. i. Preserved trees should have a permeable surface area equal to the critical root zone. The critical root zone is equal to half of the radius of the tree’s mature canopy, measured from the trunk out to the dripline. ii. Planted trees have a suggested minimum permeable area and soil volume based upon tree size; refer to Table 10-21-5D (1) for details. iii. Permeable area for one (1) tree cannot count toward that of another tree. (d) Structural Soil. When the critical root zone of an existing tree or the suggested permeable surface area requirement of a newly planted tree extends below any pavement, structural soil is required underneath the pavement. 3. Pedestrian Lighting. Pedestrian light fixtures shall be installed per the street requirements of the City’s Department of Public Works and any streetscape master plan adopted by the City. FINAL DRAFT March 2019 55DRAFT10-21-5 Site Development Standards RoadNew Neighborhoow StreetRow Building Lots Row Building Lots Row Building LotsRow Building LotsMain Street Building LotsAlleyDevelopment Limits New Neighborhood Street Figure 10-21-5D (2). Example of New Street and Block Configuration for Large Parcels or When Multiple Parcels are Combined. 4. New Streets and Subdivision. For all developments with total parcel acreage larger than five (5) acres, subdivision and construction of a new street will yield the most buildings. (Building Types require buildings to front streets). Refer to Figure 10-21-5D (2) for an example of a typical new block and street configuration. The following recommendations apply: (a) Interconnected Street Pattern. Streets shall connect and continue existing streets from adjoining areas and cul-de-sac and dead end streets should be avoided. (b) Blocks. i. The shape of a block shall be generally rectangular, but may vary due to natural features or site constraints. ii. Blocks shall typically be two (2) lots deep with the exception of blocks containing open space. Blocks may also include an alley. Blocks may included existing lots within an existing zoning district. iii. Blocks shall typically be fronted with lots on at least two (2) faces, preferably on the longest street faces. iv. Consider lot and block orientation for maximum energy efficiency. For example, block orientation along an east- west longitudinal axis will encourage development of buildings oriented along an east-west axis, with smaller east and west facing facades, able to take advantage of passive solar technology. v. Block size should be less than four hundred (400) feet. (c) Access Points. A minimum of two (2) access points should be provided for each development, with a minimum of one (1) per every 1,500 feet of boundary recommended. (d) Primary Streets. Designate primary streets so that all buildings front at least one primary street. Vehicular access should not be located off a Primary Street, unless the parcel is fronted by more than two primary streets. (e) Blocks may include interior alleys or lanes. (f) Typical Lot Configuration. All lots shall have frontage along a public street unless otherwise specified in Building Type requirements. Flag lots are prohibited. Yorkville Downtown Overlay District Form-Based Code56DRAFT10-21-5 Site Development Standards Temporary Structures Requirements 1. Siting Minimum area of Unenclosed, Fully or Partially Paved Outdoor Activity/Display Area 45% of parcel Min Lot Width Max Lot Width none 50’ Max Impervious Coverage Additional Semi-pervious Coverage 80% 15% Required Front & Corner Side Frontage Type 0’ to 5’ Parking Setbacks Front Corner, Side, Rear 75’ 5’ Parking & Loading Facility Location Access From Alley or Side Street Required Buffer between Parking & Activity/Display Area none 2. Accessory Buildings Number of Permitted Accessory Buildings 2 Max Building Coverage 20% Temporary Building Front Yard Setback Corner Side Setback Side Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback 75’ 15’ 0’ 5’ Kiosk Building Front, Corner, Side, Read Setback Max Size Max Height Min Front Facade Transparency Roof Type 5’ 500 sf one story or 15’ 20% Pitched, Flat, Parapet Existing Vegetation May be credited toward buffer area 3. Uses Permitted Uses Assembly General Retail General Service Notes: 1 This screening requirement does not prohibit the installation of or provision for openings necessary for allowable access drives and walkways connecting to the public sidewalk. 2 In Front and Corner Yards, when the parking area is located adjacent to any building on the lot, the buffer must be located so that it aligns with or is behind the face of the adjacent building back to the vehicular area. The area between the buffer and the property line must be landscaped. a b c d e f h g i j k l m Figure 10-21-5E (1). Temporary Structure Siting Table 10-21-5E (1). Temporary Structures Requirements. E. Temporary Structures 1. General Requirements. Refer to 10-17 Fencing and Screening for all landscaping and screening requirements. 2. Description and intent. Temporary Structures are allowed in all Districts according to the following guidelines. The small scale activity or display area can be a patio for outdoor eating or display of goods and should constitute the majority of the site. The frontage required continues the streetwall of the adjacent buildings, allowing a continuous pedestrian experience from the street with views into the outdoor space. Two accessory structures are permitted. A temporary building may be erected in the rear of the Lot and allows patrons to enter the building. A permanent kiosk may be located anywhere on the Lot, but allows employees only in the interior. 3. Regulations. Regulations for Temporary Structures are defined in the adjacent table. 4. Mobile Food Vendors. Refer to Section 10-3-14 Mobile Food Vendor Vehicles & Retail Vendor Vehicles for all mobile food vendor requirements.Corner Property LineTemporaryBuildingKiosk Primary StreetSecondary StreetFront Property Line Rear Property Line Interior Side Property Linef m k ei g h j d a m l c b FINAL DRAFT March 2019 57DRAFT10-21-5 Site Development Standards This page intentionally left blank 1. Determine the Project’s District Portion of the Regulating Plan that shows Applicant’s parcel. Refer to: Figure 10-21-1B (1) Yorkville Form-Based Districts Regulating Plan. Provide to Applicant: Intent of Districts Discuss with Aplicant: 2. Determine the Project’s Building Type Portion of Section 10-21-4 that applies to the building types proposed in the project. Refer to: Table 10-21-4A (1) Permitted Building Types per District Provide to Applicant: Intent of Building Types Discuss with Aplicant: 3. Determine the Project’s Intended Use Portion of Section 10-21-3 that applies to the uses proposed in the project. Refer to: Table 10-21-3B (1) Permitted Uses Table. Provide to Applicant: Permitted uses within the project. Discuss with Applicant: Development Standards and Special Uses applicable to the project. 4. Assemble Applicable Supplemental Guidelines Portion of Section 10-21-4 that applies to the building types proposed in the project. Refer to: Section 10-21-5 Site Development Standards, as well as any other relevant code guidelines (Stormwater Ordinance 2012- 56, Health Department Requirements, etc.). Provide to Applicant: Concepts and Intent of Site Development Standards Discuss with Aplicant: Parking 5. Retain Copies of All Documents Provided to Applicant (for use in the review of the Applicant’s submission) Draft August 2018DRAFTAdministrator Checklist: Pre-Application Meeting