Unified Development Ordinance Advisory Committee Packet 2021 06-18-21 - revised
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA
Friday, June 18, 2021
6:00 PM
Yorkville City Hall Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Meeting Called to Order: 6:00 p.m.
Roll Call:
Establishment of Quorum
Previous meeting minutes: April 21, 2020
Citizen’s Comments:
1. Reintroduction to the Project & New Process Timeline
2. City Staff Overview of Materials
3. Consultant Houseal Lavigne Review of Materials
4. Committee Comments and Questions
5. Project Schedule, Next Steps, and Future Meeting Dates
6. Adjournment
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, Illinois 60560
Telephone: 630-553-4350
www.yorkville.il.us
REVISED 06-10-21 @ 4:30 PM
Meeting day corrected to
Friday, June 18, 2021
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA
Tuesday, June 18, 2021
6:00 PM
Yorkville City Hall Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Meeting Called to Order: 6:00 p.m.
Roll Call:
Establishment of Quorum
Previous meeting minutes: April 21, 2020
Citizen’s Comments:
1. Reintroduction to the Project & New Process Timeline
2. City Staff Overview of Materials
3. Consultant Houseal Lavigne Review of Materials
4. Committee Comments and Questions
5. Project Schedule, Next Steps, and Future Meeting Dates
6. Adjournment
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, Illinois 60560
Telephone: 630-553-4350
www.yorkville.il.us
Page 1 of 2
DRAFT
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE
ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
Tuesday, April 21, 2020 7:00pm
Council Chambers
800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Il
The meeting was called to order at 7:00pm by Chairman Chris Funkhouser and a quorum was
established.
Due to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, this meeting was held with most of the committee members
attending remotely.
Introductions
Roll Call
The following answered present from their remote locations:
Chris Funkhouser, Chairman/Alderman
Daniel Transier, Alderman
David Schultz, Engineer-HR Green
Mike Torrence, BKFD
Deborah Horaz, PZC Committee
Jeff Olson, PZC Chairman
Reagan Goins, Attorney
Absent:
Billie McCue, Developer
Others Present:
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director
Jason Engberg, Senior Planner
Nick Davis, Hauseal Lavigne/remote attendance
Jackie Wells, Hauseal Lavigne/remote attendance
Mr. Davis thanked everyone for attending and briefly outlined the material to be covered at this
meeting including the Zoning District Standards memorandum and Chapter 3 Review of Zoning
District Standards.
Previous Meeting Minutes June 13, 2019 and November 14, 2019
The minutes for November 14, 2019 were approved on a motion by Mr. Torrence and second by Ms.
Horaz with voice vote approval. The June 13, 2019 minutes were approved on a motion by Mr.
Torrence and second by Ms. Goins with a voice vote approval.
Page 2 of 2
Citizens Comments None
1. Consultant Houseal Lavigne Review of Materials
a. Zoning District Standards Memorandum
Ms. Wells began the discussion for the proposed changes to the city zoning district, zoning map and
permitted uses outlined in the memo. The consultants proposed the 16 zoning districts be reduced to
12. They also recommended underlying zoning be established for each PUD, which would still be
governed by their PUD ordinances. It was also recommended to combine one small neighborhood of
the R1 district with the R2 district. Ms. Wells reviewed the B1, B2, proposed B3, M1 and M2 districts
with a proposal to combine M1 and M2. A new district, PI, was suggested for Public and Institutional.
b. & c. Chapter 3: Zoning District Standards (redline and clean)
Questions on the draft of the code were entertained. Chairman Funkhouser inquired about the
proposed townhomes in the Kendall Marketplace. He asked if this development was consistent with
other townhomes in regards to single family homes on the north side of the property and townhomes on
the south side. There was a brief discussion.
Ms. Wells continued and said zoning districts were established and legalese was eliminated. No major
revisions were made to maps and she reviewed the revisions made to each section. She recommended
density language be eliminated.
Some manufacturing districts were combined and some standards eliminated. There was some
discussion of R1 and R2 regarding not all minimum requirements being met. The minimum density in
R2 at 10,000 sq. ft. is about 4 dwelling units per acre. In R3 there is a minimum size of 18,000 sq. ft.
for each duplex unit or 9,000 sq. ft. per dwelling unit. Ms. Wells said the density number will be
eliminated and lot size would be used. Chairman Funkhouser said he wants to maintain the flexibility
with the multi-family housing. The consultants will work with staff on this issue.
Committee Comments and Questions
Ms. Noble commented on lot size and a possible reduction of the square feet to 8,000-10,000 for R2.
She asked if that would be presented to the committee later. Mr. Olson said he would be interested in
such a discussion especially when Mr. McCue is present. A suggestion was also made to possibly
create a new district between R2 and R3. This will be discussed more at a later time.
Mr. Olson asked if the different 'use' categories will be linked to definitions. It was noted the
definitions will be included in one chapter of the ordinance.
Ms. Noble said it would be helpful to have a visual for lots vs. units in regards to density.
Project Schedule and Next Steps
Mr. Davis said the next steps are to work with staff on adjustments, revisions for Blackberry Shore
Lane and insure the densities for multi-family housing are flexible. Staff also highlighted definitions
that need extra work. Any additional comments or questions can be sent to Mr. Engberg. The
consultants will be working on general development and drafts of design standards.
Adjournment:
There was no further business and the meeting adjourned at 7:46pm.
Transcribed from digital recording,
Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker
SUMMARY:
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Yorkville’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) project was put on
a one-year pause from May 2020 to May 2021. Prior to the project’s hiatus, the UDO Advisory
Committee met three previous times to discuss the project and review materials from the City’s consultant
Houseal Lavigne. The materials included a project overview, diagnostic memo on the City’s current code,
and a review of Chapter 3 revisions. The comments and insights given at these meetings help in forming a
code that is fit for Yorkville.
This meeting is to reconnect with the Advisory Committee and seek feedback on any of the previous
materials. Houseal Lavigne is working on the next steps of the project but due to the large gap in the
timeline, staff felt it best to reconvene and review the previous materials. The pandemic has changed how
some parts of development are viewed and where it may be going into the future. This meeting will help
guide the consultant if there needs to be any changes to previous materials.
DISCUSSION TOPICS:
The previous meeting was held on April 21, 2020 and it was at the beginning of the City’s usage of
remote meetings. While the materials were covered at that meeting, the atmosphere for discussion was not
ideal. Therefore, staff is recommending that the advisory committee consider the following topics in
preparation for the June 18, 2021 meeting:
• Residential Lot Size – at a previous meeting, it was recommended that the City reduce the lot size
for the R-2 District from 12,000 square feet to 10,000 square feet. This helps reduce non-
conforming lots and incentivizes more outright permitted development. To improve housing
types and affordability within the City, should this be reduced to 8,000 square feet or should
a new district be created to accommodate smaller lots?
• Houseal Lavigne have proposed combining some zoning districts including the M-1 and M-2
districts, OS-1 and OS-2 districts, and creating a Public Institutional district. Do you believe that
this will make our code more streamlined and efficient? Do you have any reservations about
combining any districts?
• In Table 3-9 “Maximum Density” has been removed from the table to improve the possibility for
more outright permitted development. Do you believe the bulk regulations in the table and
other parts of the code mitigate any negative effects of more potential density?
• There are several uses being removed and categorized under broader terms (i.e. retail, services) as
well as new uses being added (data center). Do you agree with the changes and are there any
new uses that should be added to the table?
Memorandum
To: Unified Development Ordinance Advisory Committee
From: Jason Engberg, Senior Planner
CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator
Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director
Date: June 7, 2021
Subject: Unified Development Ordinance – Project Resumption
ATTACHMENTS:
1. HL Non-Conformities Analysis
2. HL Zoning Districts Standards Memo
3. Chapter 3 – Zoning District Standards (redline and clean)
4. Updated Project Schedule
Date: January 17, 2020 SENT VIA EMAIL
To: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director
Jason Engberg, Senior Planner
United City of Yorkville, IL
From: Nik Davis, AICP
Jackie Wells, AICP
Re: Nonconformities Analysis Results and Recommendations
This memorandum is delivered in support of the Unified Development Ordinance
(UDO) project for the United City of Yorkville. It presents the results of the
nonconformities analysis performed in support of the development of UDO Chapter 3:
Zoning District Standards.
A nonconformities analysis compares the minimum lot area and lot width
requirements established in a zoning code with existing development within those
districts. The analysis provides insight on how regulations can be right-sized to
minimize nonconforming lots, easing the burden on residents as they look to reinvest
in their property and on staff and elected/appointed officials as they review and
consider variance requests. In Yorkville, the nonconformities analysis was performed
for all the single-family detached parcels in the R1 and R2 Districts. The parcels that
were not included in the analysis are detailed on the attached “Noncontributing
Parcels” map. A nonconformities analysis was not conducted on the City’s R2d, R3, or
R4 Districts due to the varying dimensional requirements for the different types of
housing that are permitted in those areas.
United City of Yorkville
Unified Development Ordinance
Houseal Lavigne 1/17/20
Nonconformities Analysis Review and Recommendations Memo Page 2
R1 District
The R1 District is Yorkville’s lowest density single-family detached zoning district with a minimum lot
area requirement of 18,000 square feet and minimum lot width requirement of 100 feet. The
nonconformities analysis revealed that 220 of the 264 total lots, or 83 percent, are less than the
minimum lot area requirement and therefore nonconforming; and 174 lots, or 72 percent, are less than
the minimum lot width requirements and therefore nonconforming. To understand what minimums
would be most appropriate for the district, alternative minimums were tested. The results of that test
are included in the tables below and illustrated in the attached maps.
Alternative
Lot Area Minimum
Number of
Nonconforming Parcels
Percent of
Nonconforming Parcels
16,000 square feet 198 75%
14,000 square feet 160 61%
12,000 square feet 56 22%
11,000 square feet 32 12%
Alternative
Lot Width Minimum
Number of
Nonconforming Parcels
Percent of
Nonconforming Parcels
90 feet 174 66%
80 feet 92 35%
70 feet 57 22%
The analysis revealed that a more appropriate lot area minimum is 12,000 or 11,000 square feet and
that a more fitting lot width minimum is 70 feet. The analysis also revealed that there is a neighborhood
near Hiding Spot Park that is comprised of lots that are significantly smaller than the other lots in the
R1 district. To eliminate the nonconformities related to these parcels, it is recommended that the City
rezone them to the R2 District.
To better understand whether 12,000 square feet or 11,000 square feet is the more suitable lot area
minimum, both alternatives were tested to see if they create any new opportunities for subdivision.
New opportunities for subdivision include those lots that are two times greater than the alternative lot
area and lot width minimums but are less than two times greater than the existing lot area and lot width
minimums. This analysis revealed that only three new opportunities for subdivision would be created
by the 12,000 and 11,000 square foot lot area minimums and 70-foot lot width minimum.
Based on this analysis, it is recommended that Yorkville revise the lot area minimum for the R1
District to 12,000 square feet. A 12,000 square foot lot area minimum will eliminate 61 percent of the
existing lot area nonconformities and establish a standard for any new development in the district that
is more typical and easier to develop than an 11,000 square foot lot area. Additionally, it is
recommended that Yorkville revise its lot width minimum for the R1 District to 70 feet.
United City of Yorkville
Unified Development Ordinance
Houseal Lavigne 1/17/20
Nonconformities Analysis Review and Recommendations Memo Page 3
R2 District
The R2 District is Yorkville’s highest density single-family detached zoning district with a minimum lot
area requirement of 12,000 square feet and minimum lot width requirement of 80 feet. The
nonconformities analysis revealed that 1,994 of the 6,358 total lots, or 31 percent, are less than the
minimum lot width requirement and therefore nonconforming; and 2,651 lots, or 42 percent, are less
than the minimum lot area requirements and therefore nonconforming. To understand what
minimums would be most appropriate for the district, alternative minimums were tested. The results
of that test are included in the tables below and illustrated in the attached maps.
Alternative
Lot Area Minimum
Number of
Nonconforming Parcels
Percent of
Nonconforming Parcels
10,000 square feet 796 13%
8,000 square feet 442 7%
Alternative
Lot Width Minimum
Number of
Nonconforming Parcels
Percent of
Nonconforming Parcels
70 feet 1,469 23%
60 feet 1,042 17%
The analysis revealed that a more appropriate lot area minimum is 10,000 square feet since it will
eliminate 18 percent of the existing nonconformities and only allow for development that is in keeping
with the character of the community. The analysis also revealed that a more fitting lot width minimum
is either 70 feet or 60 feet.
To better understand whether 70 feet or 60 feet is the more suitable lot width minimum, both
alternatives were tested to see if they created any new opportunities for subdivision. New opportunities
for subdivision include those lots that are two times greater than the alternative lot area and lot width
minimums but are less than two times greater than the existing lot area and lot width minimums. This
analysis revealed that the 10,000 square foot lot area minimum and 70-foot lot width minimum would
create only six new opportunities for subdivision while the same lot area minimum and 60-foot lot width
minimum would create 23.
Based on this analysis, it is recommended that Yorkville revise the lot area minimum for the R2
District to 10,000 square feet and revise its lot width minimum to 70 feet.
Date: March 24, 2020 SENT VIA EMAIL
To: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director
Jason Engberg, Senior Planner
United City of Yorkville, IL
From: Nik Davis, AICP
Jackie Wells, AICP
Re: Draft Zoning District Standards
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide an update on the status of the United
City of Yorkville’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) project. Included is a
narrative description of the revisions which have been proposed to Chapter Three –
Zoning District Standards and the Zoning Map.
Proposed Revisions to Chapter Three – Zoning District Standards
Based on previous discussions with staff and the Steering Committee, the
recommendations included in the Diagnostic Memo, and the nonconformities analysis,
it is recommended that the City’s sixteen zoning districts be reduced to twelve. It is
proposed that the E-1 Estate Residential, B-4 Service Business District, O Office District,
M-2 General Manufacturing District, and OS-2 Active Recreation District be eliminated
since they are underutilized or can be accommodated by other zoning districts. Further
detail on how parcels included in a district proposed to be eliminated will be rezoned is
included below in the Proposed Revisions to the Zoning Map section.
It is proposed that the City repurpose its B-2 Retail Commerce Business District for a
Mixed-Use District. The properties currently designated as B-2 are nearly
indistinguishable from properties designated as B-1 or B-3, making it redundant and
unnecessary. Transitioning the B-2 District to accommodate mixed-use development
will help to align the UDO with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.
It is also proposed that the City establish the PI Public Institutional District to better
accommodate institutional and civic uses throughout the community.
United City of Yorkville
Unified Development Ordinance
Houseal Lavigne 3/24/2020
Draft Zoning District Standards Support Memo Page 2
The Bulk and Dimensional Standards Table, found in Section 3-9, has been updated to reflect the
changes to the lot area and lot width requirements of the R-1 and R-2 Districts as proposed in the
January 17, 2020 Nonconformities Analysis Results and Recommendations Memo and as discussed with
City staff. Further, it is recommended that the City eliminate the Transitional Yard requirement from
the Bulk and Dimensional Standards table and instead regulate this area in the landscaping
requirements section of the upcoming Chapter 5: Development Standards.
The Permitted and Special Uses Table, found in Section 3-10, has been updated to include new uses
such as accessory dwelling units (Dwelling, Secondary) and Adult Use Cannabis related uses. The
former is listed as a special use in all residential zoning districts and the latter as a special use in the B-
3 and M Districts.
Proposed Revisions to the Zoning Map
To support the proposed revisions to the City’s zoning districts, the following zoning map revisions are
recommended. A diagram illustrating the proposed revisions is included at the end of this section.
Proposed R-1 District
As shown on the attached “Proposed R-1 District” map, it is recommended that the R-1 Single-Unit
Suburban Residence District include the majority of the existing R-1 designated parcels as well as select
E-1 and PUD parcels that have been designated by the City as suburban residential in its Future Land
Use Map or designated as estate / conservation residential in the Future Land Use Map and are in
proximity to other R-1 designated parcels.
Proposed R-2 District
As shown on the attached “Proposed R-2 District” map, it is recommended that the R-2 Single-Unit
Traditional Residence District include the majority of existing R-2 designated parcels as well as select
E-1 and PUD parcels that have been designated by the City as traditional residential in its Future Land
Use Map or designated as estate / conservation residential in the Future Land Use Map and are in
proximity to other R-2 designated parcels. Additionally it is recommended that the R-1 District
designated neighborhood near Hiding Spot Park that is comprised of lots that are significantly smaller
than the other lots in the R-1 district be rezoned to the R-2 District to minimize nonconformities in the
area.
Proposed B-1 District
As shown on the attached “Proposed B-1 District” map, it is recommended that the B-1 Local Business
District include the majority of existing B-1 designated parcels as well as select B-2 and O District
designated parcels that are located in close proximity of residential neighborhoods and are of a scale
and intensity most appropriate for neighborhood oriented businesses.
United City of Yorkville
Unified Development Ordinance
Houseal Lavigne 3/24/2020
Draft Zoning District Standards Support Memo Page 3
Proposed B-2 District
As shown on the attached “Proposed B-2 District” map, it is recommended that the B-2 Mixed Use
District include those parcels that comprise the Downtown Yorkville overlay district as well as the PUD
District designated parcel identified in the Future Land Use Map for transit oriented development.
Proposed B-3 District
As shown on the attached “Proposed B-3 District” map, it is recommended that the B-3 General
Business District include the majority of existing B-3 designated parcels as well as select B-2 and PUD
District designated parcels that are located along major roadways and are of a scale and intensity most
appropriate for regional serving retail uses.
Proposed M District
As shown on the attached “Proposed M District” map, it is recommended that the M Manufacturing
District include existing M-1 designated parcels all M-2 District designated parcels and the PUD District
designated parcels that are identified in the Future Land Use map for general industrial uses.
Proposed OS District
As shown on the attached “Proposed OS District” map, it is recommended that the OS Open Space
District include all OS-1 District, OS-2 District, and Forest Preserve designated parcels. Additionally, it is
recommended that the PUD District designated parcels that are identified in the Future Land Use map
for parks and open space be included in the OS District.
Proposed PI District
As shown in the attached “Proposed PSP District” map, it is recommended that the PI Public
Institutional District include parcels identified in the Future Land Use map for institutional use as well
as the parcels associated with the Rush Copley Hospital.
United City of Yorkville
Unified Development Ordinance
Houseal Lavigne 3/24/2020
Draft Zoning District Standards Support Memo Page 4
Bridge StRoute 71
Corneils Rd
Sc
h
o
olh
o
useRdRoute47E Veter
a
n
s
P
k
w
y
Route 30
Proposed Zoning Designation
A-1 Agricultural District
OS Open Space District
R-1 Single-Unit Suburban Residence District
R-2 Single-Unit Traditional Residence District
R-2D Duplex, Two-Unit Attached Residence District
R-3 Multi-Unit Attached Residence District
R-4 General Multi-Unit District
B-1 Local Business District
B-2 Mixed Use District
B-3 General Business District
M Manufacturing District
PI Public Institutional District
Proposed Zoning Map
United City of Yorkville
Number of Parcels
Proposed to be Rezoned
R-1: 57
R-2: 78
B-1: 17
B-2: 80
B-3: 106
M: 9
PSP: 42
OS: 31
Total: 420 (4.43%)
Fox River
Bridge StRoute 71
Corneils Rd
Sc
h
o
olh
o
useRdRoute47 E Veter
a
n
s
P
k
w
y
Route 30
Existing Zoning Designation
E-1 Estate Residence District
R-1 Single-Family Detached Suburban Residence District
Planned Unit Development District
Proposed R-1 District
Parcels shown in colors shown in the legend
comprise those proposed to be included in the
R-1 District.
Bridge StRoute 71
Corneils Rd
Sc
h
o
olh
o
useRdRoute47 E Veter
a
n
s
P
k
w
y
Route 30
Existing Zoning Designation
E-1 Estate Residence District
R-1 Single-Family Suburban Residence District
R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District
Planned Unit Development District
Proposed R-2 District
Parcels shown in colors shown in the legend
comprise those proposed to be included in the
R-2 District.
Bridge StRoute 71
Corneils Rd
Sc
h
o
olh
o
useRdRoute47 E Veter
a
n
s
P
k
w
y
Route 30
Existing Zoning Designation
B-1 Local Business District
B-2 Retail Commercial District
O Office District
Proposed B-1 District
Parcels shown in colors shown in the legend
comprise those proposed to be included in the
B-1 District.
Bridge StRoute 71
Corneils Rd
Sc
h
o
olh
o
useRdRoute47 E Veter
a
n
s
P
k
w
y
Route 30
Existing Zoning Designation
OS-1 Passive Open Space District
OS-2 Active Open Space District
R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District
R-3 Multifamily Attached Residence District
R-4 General Multifamily Residence District
B-1 Local Business District
B-2 Retail Commerce Business District
B-3 General Business District
M-1 Limited Manufacturing District
Planned Unit Development District
Proposed B-2 District
Parcels shown in colors shown in the legend
comprise those proposed to be included in the
B-2 District.
Bridge StRoute 71
Corneils Rd
Sc
h
o
olh
o
useRdRoute47 E Veter
a
n
s
P
k
w
y
Route 30
Existing Zoning Designation
B-2 Retail Commerce Business District
B-3 General Business District
Planned Unit Development District
Proposed B-3 District
Parcels shown in colors shown in the legend
comprise those proposed to be included in the
B-3 District.
Bridge StRoute 71
Corneils Rd
Sc
h
o
olh
o
useRdRoute47 E Veter
a
n
s
P
k
w
y
Route 30
Existing Zoning Designation
M-1 Limited Manufacturing District
M-2 General Manufacturing District
Planned Unit Development District
Proposed M District
Parcels shown in colors shown in the legend
comprise those proposed to be included in the
M District.
Bridge StRoute 71
Corneils Rd
Sc
h
o
olh
o
useRdRoute47 E Veter
a
n
s
P
k
w
y
Route 30
Existing Zoning Designation
A-1 Agricultural District
B-1 Local Business District
M-1 Limited Manufacturing District
O Office District
Planned Unit Development District
R-1 Single-Family Detached Suburban Residence District
R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District
R-3 Multi-Family Attached Residence District
Proposed PI District
Parcels shown in colors shown in the legend
comprise those proposed to be included in the PI
District.
Bridge StRoute 71
Corneils Rd
Sc
h
o
olh
o
useRdRoute47 E Veter
a
n
s
P
k
w
y
Route 30
Existing Zoning Designation
OS-1 Passive Open Space District
OS-2 Active Open Space District
Forest Preserve
Planned Unit Development District
Proposed OS District
Parcels shown in colors shown in the legend
comprise those proposed to be included in the
OS District.
Commented [JW1]:
Commented [JW2]:
2019
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
2019
Dec
2020
Jan Feb Mar
2021
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2022
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
1
Step 1: Project Initiation and Outreach ADOPTION PERIOD
1A Project Initiation – Staff Meeting & Review of Preliminarily Issues
1B Plan Commission Workshop
1C Residential Areas Zoning Workshop
1D Commercial and Industrial Areas Zoning Workshop
1E Subdivision Ordinance Focus Group
1F Project Website (optional)
1G map.social (Online Map-Based Engagement Platform)(optional)
2
Step 2: Technical Analysis & Best Practices
2A Assessment of Existing Land Use Regulations
2B “Best Practices” Research and Assessment
2C Form-based Code Applicability Analysis
2D City Staff Working Session
2E PC Meeting
3
Step 3: Draft District Standards and Concepts
3A Draft Residential and Agricultural District Standards
3B Draft Commercial and Industrial District Standards
3C Special District Standards (OS, PUD, Downtown Overlay)
3D Proposed Zoning Districts Map
3E Staff Review Meeting
3F PC Meeting
4
Step 4: General Development Standards
4A Preliminary Amendments for Parking, Landscaping, Development Standards
4B Staff Review Meeting
5
Step 5: Draft Subdivision Design/Improvements
5A Review of Subdivision Code for Compatibility and Best Practices
5B Draft Modified Subdivision Design/Improvement Regulations
5C Staff Review Meeting
5D PC Meeting
6
Step 6: Administrative & Procedural Standards
6A Draft Administrative, Applications, Approval, and Procedures
6B Staff Review Meeting
6C PC Meeting
7
Step 7: Draft & Final UDO
7A Draft UDO Ordinance
7B Staff Review and Meeting
7C PC Meeting
7D Revised UDO & Final Legal Review
7E Public Hearing
7F City Board Presentation and Adoption
8 Step 8: Web-based “Smart Code” Integration
8A enCodePlus Software Integration
UDO PROJECT SCHEDULE
Unified City of Yorkville UDO | Houseal Lavigne | Updated February 2021 Unified City of Yorkville requested project be put on hold Feb 26, 2020
Project restarted June 2021
Denotes meetings to be conducted by Project Team.Denotes events to be held by the Project Team.Denotes products to be delivered by the Project