Public Works Packet 2023 07-18-23
AGENDA
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING
Tuesday, July 18, 2023
6:00 p.m.
East Conference Room #337
651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Yorkville, IL
Citizen Comments:
Minutes for Correction/Approval: June 20, 2023
New Business:
1. PW 2023-57 Capital Improvement Projects Update
2. PW 2023-58 Quarterly Bond and Letter of Credit Reduction Summary
3. PW 2023-59 BrightFarms – Well Modifications
4. PW 2023-60 Grande Reserve Stop Sign Recommendations
5. PW 2023-61 Garden Street – No Parking Recommendation
6. PW 2023-62 Corneils Road Interceptor – Change Order No. 2 (Balancing)
7. PW 2023-63 2023 Water Main Improvements Contract A – Change Order No. 1
8. PW 2023-64 2023 Water Main Improvements Contract B – Change Order No. 1
9. PW 2023-65 Beaver Street Pump Station Improvements – Change Order No. 1 (Balancing)
10. PW 2023-66 South Central EWST Rehabilitation - Design Engineering Agreement
Old Business:
Additional Business:
United City of Yorkville
651 Prairie Pointe Drive
Yorkville, Illinois 60560
Telephone: 630-553-4350
www.yorkville.il.us
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
WORKSHEET
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
Tuesday, July 18, 2023
6:00 PM
CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CITIZEN COMMENTS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. June 20, 2023
□ Approved __________
□ As presented
□ With corrections
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW BUSINESS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. PW 2023-57 Capital Improvement Projects Update
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. PW 2023-58 Quarterly Bond and Letter of Credit Reduction Summary
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. PW 2023-59 BrightFarms – Well Modifications
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. PW 2023-60 Grande Reserve Stop Sign Recommendations
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. PW 2023-61 Garden Street – No Parking Recommendation
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. PW 2023-62 Corneils Road Interceptor – Change Order No. 2 (Balancing)
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. PW 2023-63 2023 Water Main Improvements Contract A – Change Order No. 1
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. PW 2023-64 2023 Water Main Improvements Contract B – Change Order No. 1
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. PW 2023-65 Beaver Street Pump Station Improvements – Change Order No. 1 (Balancing)
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. PW 2023-66 South Central EWST Rehabilitation - Design Engineering Agreement
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
Minutes
Tracking Number
Minutes of the Public Works Committee – June 20, 2023
Public Works Committee – July 18, 2023
Majority
Committee Approval
Minute Taker
Name Department
DRAFT
Page 1 of 3
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
Tuesday, June 20, 2023, 6:00pm
Yorkville City Hall, East Conference Room #337
651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Yorkvile, IL
IN ATTENDANCE:
Committee Members
Chairman Ken Koch Alderman Rusty Corneils
Alderman Matt Marek Alderman Craig Soling
Other City Officials
City Administrator Bart Olson Public Works Director Eric Dhuse
Assistant City Administrator Erin Willrett Engineer Brad Sanderson, EEI
Alderman Chris Funkhouser (via Zoom)
Other Guests:
Mr. Chris Hansen, Kluber Architects Mike Krempski
Dave Guss
The meeting was called to order at 6:00pm by Chairman Ken Koch.
Citizen Comments:
Minutes for Correction/Approval: May 16, 2023
The minutes were approved as presented.
New Business:
1. 2023-51 Resolution Approving an Agreement By and Between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall
County, Illinois and Illinois Railway, LLC
Mr. Dhuse provided an update for the cost of the railroad repair at the Poplar Drive crossing. The railway
needed to go out for bids because they could not do the repairs in stages as they originally thought. They would
have needed to raise the tracks so much that they decided to repair the entire 80 feet at one time instead of
stages. They will construct a gravel road for access for the 5-7 day project. Some cleanup and repaving will also
be done bringing the total time of the project to 2-3 weeks and the crews will work nights as well. The increase
was approximately $20,000. Director Dhuse said the railroad is waiting for city approval and will begin
immediately. This moves forward to the Council consent agenda for approval.
2. PW 2023-52 Public Works Facility Discussion – Scope and Cost Comparisons
Mr. Olson discussed two options for the Public Works facility compared to other municipalities. In the agenda
packet, Kluber Architects and Engineers provided square foot costs for some of the nearby projects. Kluber has
built or designed more Public Works building than any other firm in Illinois. There was an article in the Beacon
News that reported the cost of the Montgomery facility and that Yorkville was so much higher. Mr. Hansen did
an analysis and found that Montgomery had bid out 2 years prior and also eliminated some items. He also found
information on salt and material storage, fuel facility and if similar costs are included in the estimates. He
provided those figures to the committee to try and compare “apples to apples”.
Mr. Hansen has also bid part of Aurora's Public Works facility and compared the Yorkville and Aurora costs for
Page 2 of 3
similar features. He has bid on 2/3 of that project since doing it in stages capitalizes on the market which has
corrected itself downward about 2%. However, he noted that union workers recently received a 4.2% increase.
Mr. Olson said no action is needed at this meeting, however, a smaller version may need to be chosen. The next
step is to choose a scope prior to selecting an architect.
Comments from Aldermen: Alderman Funkhouser suggested an L-shaped building for wall-sharing cost
savings. Mr. Hansen added that a box-like footprint would also save considerable money. Alderman Corneils
asked if Public Works has hired a fleet mechanic. The position will not be filled until the facility is done.
Alderman Soling asked if there is enough space for employees. Mr. Dhuse replied that he has asked for
employee input and Tim Evans also provided ideas. The Facilities staff will also join Public Works.
Alderman Koch cautioned against comparing Aurora and Yorkville, since Aurora has a larger revenue stream.
Alderman Funkhouser said he likes the idea of 100% coverage for vehicles and equipment and does not want to
compromise on that. (Zoom connection was lost for part of his opinion). He asked about a Morton-type
building. Mr. Hansen said it could be explored but might be difficult since some pre-fab structures have trouble
complying with the energy conservation code. He said tilt-up precast is generally the most cost-effective in this
type of building. Chairman Koch asked about funds to repair more roads and if road repairs will be decided
before the new facility. This will need to be determined by the Council, said Mr. Olson. However, he said the
Lake Michigan project is the top priority.
3. PW 2023-53 2023 Water Main Replacement Contract B – Contract Award
Mr. Sanderson reported bids went out last week. This was the additional water main added at the urging of
IDNR to reduce water losses below 10%. The low bidder was above both the estimate and budget since this is
not the ideal bidding time. The Council decided earlier this year to authorize this work. There is much
underground work being done in northern Illinois and thus a higher level of contractor need. To bring the
project within budget, Mr. Sanderson recommended moving a block of Colton St. replacement to 2024, thereby
saving $190,000. If approved, a Change Order would be issued. He said that 30% of that project is road work.
The recommended bid is for Winninger Excavating and Alderman Corneils noted a correction needed in the
amount shown in the memo. The correct bid is $1,983,518.
Mr. Sanderson said part of the IDNR permit requires the city to replace all water main prior to 1983. The city
has 2 years to reduce water loss to below 10%. Mr. Dhuse said he is hoping to have all construction done by
2025 to reach that goal. Chairman Koch asked if the problem areas are known and Mr. Sanderson said they are
and they will be targeted. Alderman Soling commented that it's easier for the residents if all the work is done at
one time. This moves to the regular agenda for a vote.
4. PW 2023-54 2023 Water Main Replacement Contract B – Construction Engineering Agreement
Mr. Olson said this is the construction engineering agreement at a cost of $198,000 plus there is $10,700 direct
expenses for sub-contractors, both which he recommends for approval. This moves to the regular agenda.
5. PW 2023-55 E. Main Street Improvements – Balancing Change Order
Mr. Sanderson said this was the large water replacement project last year and the work is now done. It is being
closed out with a Change Order increase of about $24,000. He noted the Council had added sidewalk a year ago
which added about $59,000. That work was never formally adopted in a Change Order and the Order will
memorialize this increase. He said $53,000 of the balance is already included. He recommends approval and it
moves to the consent agenda.
6. PW 2023-56 Water Connection Fee Analysis and Recommendations
Mr. Olson said this is a 2-part discussion of how water connection fees will be decided. First, the city must
justify fees to buyers/builders which are based on permits issued for new housing starts and based on legal
calculations and second, decide what's reasonable. He said the first component of the water system is well #10
to provide current capacity and later backup capacity. It will serve 8,400 people at a cost of $6.6 million. The
second component is the Lake Michigan costs totaling $120 million. He provided an approximate estimate of
Page 3 of 3
each person's share of the cost. For residential, some towns have a flat connection fee and charge the same for
a condo or a house. Commercial and industrial fees are based on water meter size per code at this time. He does
not know if Montgomery and Oswego will change their fees. Additionally, Yorkville will be more costly since
it is farther away.
He also referred to a memo by Community Development Director Krysti Noble showing where existing platted
units are located and possible fee locks. He noted that Grande Reserve built their own water system, water
towers, treatment plant and the city canceled out the water connection fees. He also discussed other
developments within the city as a justification of fee increases.
Committee members had a discussion of nearby towns' costs compared to Yorkville. Alderman Koch noted that
builders and realtors will express displeasure when rates are raised. Alderman Funkhouser said impacts like
these can be detrimental and if there are no fee locks, the building may not occur here. He's not against raising
fees, but he cautioned about how it's done. Some developments have fee locks with varying time spans. This
is for information.
Old Business: None
Additional Business:
Alderman Koch asked if the street light in Windett Ridge was fixed. Mr. Dhuse said it was fixed the same day
they were notified. Mr. Koch also asked about the ownership of some bushes in Greenbriar and it was
determined they belonged to the nearby resident who is free to cut them down. Mr. Dhuse said there is a
conservation easement around the perimeter of the subdivision and she is not required to maintain the right-of-
way in her yard. Mr. Koch also said there is an issue with motorized mini-bikes speeding down the trails of
Windett Ridge. Mr. Olson said that must be reported when it occurs, though officers have had a difficult time
catching them. They also discussed possible signage.
There was no additional business the meeting adjourned at 7:01pm.
Minutes respectfully transcribed by Marlys Young, Minute Taker
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #1
Tracking Number
PW 2023-57
Capital Project Update
Public Works Committee – July 18, 2023
None
Informational
A status update on projects will be given.
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
The purpose of this memo is to update the Public Works Committee as to the status of the several
projects. A summary on the status of the projects is provided below:
Construction Projects
Beaver Street BPS Generator
This project is complete.
E. Main Street Improvements
This project is complete.
Bristol Ridge Road LAFO
This project is complete.
Corneils Road Interceptor
This project is complete.
Well No. 7 Rehabilitation
This project is complete.
Baseline Road Improvements
This project is complete.
North Central EWST Rehabilitation
The contractor is planning to re-mobilize in mid-August to complete the work. The project was delayed
due to timing of the completion of Well 7.
2023 Water Main Replacement Program – Contract A
The project is approximately 80% complete. The substantial completion date for the project is August 4th.
2023 Water Main Replacement Program – Contract B
The contract was awarded at the June 27th CC meeting. The completion date for the project is November
17th.
2023 RTBR Program
The contractor has begun work. The substantial completion date for the project is August 11th.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Date: June 30, 2023
Subject: Capital Improvement Projects Update
Planning/Design Projects
Kennedy / Freedom Place Intersection Improvements
Design engineering is complete. We are working on land acquisition with the City Attorney. The letting
for the project has been pushed to the winter. Construction will occur in 2024.
Well 10 and Raw Water Main
Design engineering has commenced. We are anticipating a fall letting for the well and a spring 2024
letting for the raw water main.
2024 Water Main Improvements – Contract A
Design engineering has commenced.
2024 Water Main Improvements – Contract B
Design engineering has commenced.
2023 Sanitary Sewer Lining
Design engineering has commenced. We are anticipating an August/September letting.
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #2
Tracking Number
PW 2023-58
Bond/LOC Reduction Summary Through June 30, 2023
Public Works Committee – July 18, 2023
None
Informational
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
Please see the attached reduction summary through June 30, 2023. If you have any questions,
please let me know.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Date: June 30, 2023
Subject: 2023 Bond/LOC Reduction Summary
30-Jun-232023 Bond and Letter of Credit Reduction ReportDate Development/ProjectEngineer ConcurrenceCity Administrator ConcurrenceMayor ConcurrenceReduction Final Release Reduction Value Remaining Balance2/20/2023 Windett Ridge - Unit 2XXX 284,534.28$ 862,655.46$ 3/14/2023 Rt 126/Ashley RoadXXX 429,138.16$ 161,733.72$ 3/14/2023 Ashley RoadXXX 120,766.48$ 48,401.17$ 5/30/2023 Grande Reserve - Unit 13XXX 87,600.00$ -$ 5/30/2023 Grande Reserve - Unit 14XXX 125,600.00$ -$ 5/30/2023 Grande Reserve - Unit 23XXX 520,410.95$ -$ 5/30/2023 Heartland MeadowsXXX 121,666.60$ 133,399.30$ 6/12/2023 Timber Ridge EstatesXXX 223,317.15$ 2,002,181.85$
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #3
Tracking Number
PW 2023-59
BrightFarms – Proposed Well Modification
Public Works Committee – July 18, 2023
Majority
Approval
Review of Findings
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
Overview
BrightFarms received approval from the City Council on April 26, 2022 to construct a well to
serve its development. EEI had reviewed materials provided by BrightFarms and concluded that
it would not have any significant affect on any City Wells [attachment 1]. BrightFarms also
satisfied our requests to investigate the possible well interference with local adjacent private
wells [attachment 2].
Recently, BrightFarms has requested to modify its proposal [attachment 3]. The new request
consists of relocating the proposed well to a location closer to the current building footprint. The
old well will be capped in accordance with health department requirements.
The new well is proposed to have the same specifications (640 feet deep; 200 GPM) as the
originally well.
Analysis
BrightFarms commissioned Resource Consulting, Inc. to update its survey of local wells and the
results confirmed no additional impact to private wells [attachment 3].
EEI has concluded that the proposed relocation will not change our findings.
Recommendations
We recommend that the proposed relocation be approved by the City.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please let us know.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Krysti Barksdale Noble, Community Development Director
Date: June 22, 2023
Subject: BrightFarms – Proposed Well Modification
Overview
We have reviewed the information provided by BrightFarms and Resource Consulting, Inc. concerning
the potential impact of a new groundwater well (see attached well cross section and construction details)
located on the BrightFarms site near the northeast corner of Eldamain Road and Corneils Road. This
information was provided in a series of emails between March 22nd and April 6th.
Based on the information provided and detailed analysis conducted by EEI staff, we have concluded the
following:
x We do not believe that the City’s wells will be adversely affected by the proposed well. Only one
City well (#4) is open to this formation and there is sufficient distance between them as to not
have interference.
x We are concerned that this well will have adverse effects on neighboring individual wells within
the Ancell formation, potentially within a mile of the proposed well. Our concerns are further
detailed below.
x We have reviewed the long-term sustainability of the well against the study conducted by the
Illinois State Water Survey in 2013.Based on our analysis of the study, we have concluded that
the proposed well will not have a significant impact on the sustainability of the Ancell sandstone
aquifer (see attached EEI Memo).
Analysis
EEI used the raw data provided by the consultant to complete our own independent analysis.
The water level data collected from the pumping test of the BrightFarms well can be used to estimate
transmissivity of the water bearing formations using an empirical method documented by Driscoll (1986).
The 24-hour pumping test conducted by BrightFarms resulted in 151 feet of drawdown at the pumping
rate of 200 gallons per minute. Thus, the specific capacity (pumping rate divided by drawdown) of the
well is 1.32 gallon per minute (gpm) / foot of drawdown. The method developed by Driscoll estimates
transmissivity by multiplying the specific capacity in gpm / foot by 2000. Applying this method results in
an estimate of transmissivity of 2,640 gallons per day / foot, which converts to 353 feet
2/day. Given that
the sandstone in the BrightFarms well was encountered between 518 and 640 feet bgs, the aquifer
thickness is taken as 122 feet. Dividing transmissivity by aquifer thickness yields hydraulic conductivity
of 2.9 feet / day. This value for hydraulic conductivity is consistent with published studies for the region
(Roadcap, 2013). A storativity value of 0.0001 is assumed based on specific storage values presented in
Meyer, 2009.
The estimated hydraulic parameters described above were used to estimate the drawdown created by the
BrightFarms well. The estimates are based on continuous pumping of the well at 200 gallons per minute
Memorandum
To:Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Krysti Barksdale Noble, Community Development Director
Date: April 21, 2022
Subject: Bright Farms –Review of Impact of Proposed Well
$WWDFKPHQW
using the solution developed by Theis (1935). The table below summarizes the results of the analysis,
showing the drawdown (in feet) as a function of time (days of continuous pumping) and distance from the
well (feet).
Distance from Pumping Well (feet)
5,000 10,000 15,000 Days of Continuous Pumping 30 19 10 4
365 40 31 22
1,825 (5 yrs.) 55 43 36
3,650 (10 yrs.) 60 49 42
Based on the analysis presented above, it is reasonable to expect that the BrightFarms well will create 40
to 60 feet of additional drawdown in farm wells located within 15,000 feet of the BrightFarms well over
the long-term. The additional drawdown may not affect the operation of individual wells around the
BrightFarms well, depending on the pump setting of the well in question. However, if an individual well
is operated in a manner that currently lowers the water level in the well to less than 40 feet above the
pump intake, the BrightFarms well may impact the operation of the well. In that case, the pump in the
affected individual well may need to be lowered for the well to be operated as it was prior to the pumping
of the BrightFarms well.
Recommendations
It is our recommendation that BrightFarms conduct a detailed survey of the pump setting and operational
characteristics of the individual wells within a mile of the proposed well. We would also recommend that
the pumps be lowered in any wells that are operating with less than 40 feet of water above the pump.
Based on our review of public records, there potentials are three to four individual wells within the
suggested area. The cost to lower these wells is not expected to be exorbitant.
References
Driscoll, F.G., 1986. Groundwater and Wells (2nd ed.), Johnson Filtration Systems, Inc., St. Paul,
Minnesota, 1089p.
Roadcap, G. C., Meyer, S., Kelly, W. R., Wehrmann, H. A., & Lin, Y-F. (2013). Groundwater Studies for
Water Supply Planning in Kendall County, IL. (ISWS Contract Report 2013-05; No. CR-2013-05).
Meyer, Scott & Roadcap, George & Lin, Yu-Feng & Walker, Douglas. (2009). Kane County Water
Resources Investigations: Simulation of Groundwater Flow in Kane County and Northeastern Illinois.
Theis, C.V., 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration
of discharge of a well using groundwater storage, Am. Geophys. Union Trans., vol. 16, pp. 519-524.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please let us know.
F igur e6.Det a il from cross section C-C'(Figur e5)showing aquifer s inKendall Count y
confining unit
confining unit
BF well typical shallow well
typical Yorkville well
WELL CONSTRUCTION
Subject Property
Northeast Corner of Corneils Road & Eldamain Road
Yorkville, Illinois
21-1032 01 01
Ground surface
3/30/22 DjH
Sand & gravel
Clay
Limestone, dolomite with shale
Borehole diameter = 8 inches
Borehole diameter = 6 inches
Sandstone
Casing
Borehole diameter = 12 inches
Borehole diameter = 8 inches
Static water level = 239 ft bgs
Pumping water level = 392 ft bgs
Clay
640 ft
25 ft bgs
99 ft bgs
143 ft bgs
151 ft bgs
518 ft bgs
483 ft bgs
To: Brad Sanderson, Chief Operating Officer / President
From: Tim Holdeman, Sr. Project Manager
Date: April 21, 2022
Re: Sustainability and the BrightFarms Proposed Water Supply Well
EEI Job #: YO2116-DR
Questions have been raised regarding the impact of the BrightFarms proposed water supply well on the
sustainability of the Ancell Sandstone Aquifer. The following analysis is offered to address these questions.
The primary conclusion of the analysis is that the water supply well proposed by Bright Farms will not have a
significant impact on the sustainability of the Ancell Sandstone Aquifer.
The Illinois State Water Survey (ISWS) addresses the sustainability of the deep sandstone aquifers in Kendall
County in Roadcap, 2013. The study uses a calibrated groundwater flow model to simulate groundwater
conditions under various future groundwater pumping conditions to “gain insights on the hydraulic behavi or of
the aquifer system and the sustainability of increasing groundwater demands”.
A key criterion for evaluating sustainability of the deep
sandstone aquifers in Kendall County is the head in the Ancell
sandstone. Specifically, sustainability is exceeded where
groundwater withdrawals cause the head in the Ancell
sandstone to drop below the top of the aquifer. This criterion
is used to evaluate the impact of the BrightFarms well on
sustainability of the aquifers.
The figure to the right is Figure 75 from Roadcap, 2013. The
location of the BrightFarms well has been added to the figure.
It shows the estimated available head (in feet) above the top
of the Ancell Sandstone in 2005 based on the groundwater
flow model. At the BrightFarms Well, the estimated available
head above the top of the Ancell Sandstone is approximately
180 feet.
Results of drilling the BrightFarms Well indicate a static head of 239 feet below ground surface (bgs). The top
of the Ancell sandstone is 518 feet bgs in the well. Thus, the available head above the top of the Ancell
Sandstone prior to pumping is 279 feet (518 minus 239). This is nearly 100 feet greater than predicted by the
groundwater model. The discrepancy between the predicted and actual available head above the top of the
Ancell Sandstone suggests that the groundwater flow model results are conservative (i.e. predicts less
available head above the top of the Ancell Sandstone) at the location of the BrightFarms Well.
The figures below are Figures 92-95 from Roadcap,2013. They show the available head above the top of the
Ancell Sandstone in 2050 as predicted using the calibrated groundwater flow model under four different
groundwater withdrawal scenarios.
The estimated available head above the top of the Ancell Sandstone at the BrightFarms Well (without the well
pumping) in 2050 under each scenario is shown in the table below. In addition, the table shows the difference
in available head (in feet) above the top of the Ancell Sandstone at the BrightFarms Well (without the well
pumping) from 2005 (180 feet) to 2050.
Scenario Figure
Estimated available head (in
feet) above the top of the Ancell
Sandstone at the BrightFarms
Well (without the well pumping)
in 2050
Difference in available head (in feet)
above the top of the Ancell
Sandstone at the BrightFarms Well
(without the well pumping) from
2005 to 2050
Baseline 92 100 -80
Least Resource Intense 93 120 -60
Most Resource Intense 94 90 -90
Modified Baseline 95 110 -70
Several communities in Kendall County will be ceasing their use of the deep aquifer as the primary source of
their water supply. Thus, it is reasonable to assume the Least Resource Intense scenario for predicting future
head, which is a drop of 60 feet at the Bright Farms Well.
The pumping level in the BrightFarms Well after 24 hours of pumping at 200 gallons per minute was 392 feet
bgs. This leaves 126 feet of available hear above the Ancell Sandstone (518 minus 392). If the head drops by
60 feet as predicted in the Least Resource Intense scenario, that still leaves 66 feet of head above the top of
the Ancell Sandstone. It is recognized that long-term pumping at the BrightFarms Well will likely reduce the
head below 392 feet. However, it is not likely to be greater than 66 feet using the solution developed by Theis
(1935). Thus, the BrightFarms Well under expected future conditions will not likely create the unsustainable
condition of reducing the available head to below the top of the Ancell Sandstone.
Reference
Roadcap, G. C., Meyer, S., Kelly, W. R., Wehrmann, H. A., & Lin, Y-F. (2013). Groundwater Studies for Water
Supply Planning in Kendall County, IL. (ISWS Contract Report 2013-05; No. CR-2013-05).
Theis, C.V., 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of
discharge of a well using groundwater storage, Am. Geophys. Union Trans., vol. 16, pp. 519-524.
$WWDFKPHQW
&3:&7>
7 >&3*.2'&(-
7.,-9&7283(
!4:9-:(0-4:9!97**9!:.9*
7;.3,943 *<%470
*##',% $) ) %$$
+"*) %$% %' $ ""'%&') (
' ) '#( $
"# $%%'$ "(%
%'!+ "" "" $% (
*&7 7*.2'&(-
87*6:*89*).39-*57.1 2*24+7429-*#3.9*).9>4+%470;.11* *84:7(*438:19.3,3(
(4251*9*)9-*89&9:88:7;*>4+9-*<*118<.9-.3&43*2.1*7&).:84+9-*7.,-9&728<*1114(&9.43"-*
<47051&3+4114<*)9-*,:.)&3(*57*8*39*)947.,-9&728.3&2*24+7429-*#3.9*).9>4+%470;.11*94
7.,-9&728.3(1:)*)<.9-9-.8(477*8543)*3(*&899&(-2*39
*##',% (*")(% %'!"$
*84:7(*438:19.3,89&++7*;.*<*)9-*<*117*(47)8&;&.1&'1*+479-*7*,.43<.9-.3&43*2.1*7&).:84+9-*
7.,-9&728<*11+<*118<*7*+4:3)9-&9(4:1)'*&(6:.7.3,<&9*7+7429-*8&2*:55*78&3)8943*&6:.+*7
9-*<*11(4251*9.432*9-4)8?5:258*99.3,45*7&9.43&1(-&7&(9*7.89.(8?4+9-*<*11<4:1)'*)*9*72.3*)
:7.3, 9-* &6:.+*7 &88*882*39 5-&8* 4+ 9-* 574/*(9 .9<&8 *89.2&9*) 9-&9
94 <*118 2.,-9 +.9 9-*
5&7&2*9*787*6:.7.3,+:79-*7*;&1:&9.43.39-*+.*1)
"-*7*8*&7(-(43+.72*)9-*57*8*3(*4+
549*39.&1<*11894&88*88
•<*114<3*)'> 847. 48814(&9*)&5574=.2&9*1>2.1**&894+9-*7.,-9&728<*11
• <*11845*7&9*)'> *3&7)8&9.98+&(.1.9>&5574=.2&9*1>2.1*84:9-<*894+9-*7.,-9&728<*11
"-*14(&9.4384+9-*8*<*118&3)9-*49-*78.3;*89.,&9*)+479-.88:7;*>&7*8-4<3.39-*.3+472&9.43
57*8*39*).399&(-2*39
!$ '% '( ' #*
" ) "# & #"
*9&.184+9-**++479894(477*8543)<.9-9-*<*114<3*78&7*.3(1:)*).399&(-2*39"-*.3+472&9.43
.3(1:)*8(43+.72&9.439-&9&114+9-*49-*7549*39.&1<*118.)*39.+.*)9-74:,-<*117*(47)87*8*&7(-&3)
4:97*&(-944<3*78&7*349(4251*9*).39-*8&2*+472&9.43&6:.+*7
$*11 <3*7439&(9
$*).8(:88*)9-*8.9:&9.43<.9- 8 4889-*<*114<3*7*&894+**(-*7 4&)&5574=.2&9*1>2.1**&89
4+9-*7.,-9&728<*11 8 488&,7**)94&114<9-*<*1194'*.385*(9*)(43(:77*391><.9-&3>49-*78
+4:3)):7.3,9-*574/*(9!.3(*9-&9(43;*78&9.432:19.51*&99*2598947*(433*(9<.9- 8 488<*7*
:38:((*88+:1
3&(43;*78&9.43<.9- 7 .0*841&9-* &.39*3&3(* &3&,*7&9 *3&7)8 7841&.3).(&9*)9-&9-*
<4:1)-&;*9-*&557457.&9*.39*73&15&79>7*8543)94&3*2&.19-&9<4:1)8*3)-.2!.3(*9-&9(43;*78&9.43
2:19.51*&99*259894(439&(9&3>43*&9 *3&7)8<*7*:38:((*88+:1
;&1:&9.434+$*11 *(47)83+472&9.43
"-*&;&.1&'1*7*(47)8+479-*
.)*39.+.*)<*118.3(1:)*)9-*+4114<.3,.3+472&9.43"-*8*7*(47)8&7*
.3(1:)*)<.9-9-.8(477*8543)*3(*&899&(-2*39
"-*)**5*7 *3&7)8<*117*(47).3).(&9*89-*+4114<.3,
•"-*<*11.8(4251*9*).39-*8&2*8&3)8943*:3.9&89-*7.,-9&728<*11&9&)*59-4+
94@
•"-*89&9.(<&9*71*;*1&99-*9.2*4+<*11(43897:(9.438<&8 @'*14<9-*9454+9-*(&8.3,
•"-*<&9*71*;*1&+9*75:25.3,9-*<*11&9
,52+47 -4:78<&8 +**9
•"-*5*72&3*395:25<&8.389&11*)&9&)*59-4+
+**9
"-.87*8:198.3&).89&3(*4++**9'*9<**39-*5:25&3)9-*<&9*71*;*1&9&5:25.3,7&9*4+
,52
"-*49-*7<*11&9 *3&7)8&3)9-* 488<*11&7*7*5479*)94'*+.3.8-*)&9)*59-84+ &3) +**9
7*85*(9.;*1>"-.8.89-*&5574=.2&9*)*59-4+9-*(439&(9'*9<**39-*8-&114<1.2*8943*)4142.9*&6:.+*7
&3)9-*:55*78&3)8943*&6:.+*79-&99-*7.,-9&728<*11:8*8!.3(*9-*8*<*118&7*349+.3.8-*).39-*
:55*78&3)8943*9-*7.,-9&728<*11:8*2&>349&++*(99-*2949-*)*,7***89.2&9*)'>9-*24)*1.3,
%$"*( %$(
"-*<*1189&9:88:7;*>(4251*9*)'> *84:7(*438:19.3,3((43+.72*)9-*57*8*3(*4+
8:551><*118
9-&92*99-*,:.)*1.3*8*89&'1.8-*)'>9-*#3.9*).9>4+%470;.11*+477*6:.7.3,+:79-*7*;&1:&9.43"-*
+:79-*77*;.*<4+&;&.1&'1*<*11.3+472&9.43.3).(&9*)9-&9 4+9-*<*118&7*349(4251*9*).39-*8&2*
&6:.+*7 &3) 9-* 9-.7) &55*&78 94 -&;* .98 5:25 8*9 &9 & 7*&843&'1* )*59- :19.51* &99*2598 &9
(477*8543)*3(* <.9- 9-* <*11 4<3*78 9-&9 (1*&71> .)*39.+.*) 9-* ,4&1 4+ 9-* 8:7;*> 7*8:19*) .3 9-*2
).8(439.3:.3,(439&(9<.9- *84:7(*438:19.3,
114+9-*.3+472&9.4357*8*39*)&'4;*.8&((:7&9*&99-*9.2*4+9-.8<7.9.3, *<47&)).9.43&17*1*;&39
.3+472&9.4347574/*(9)*;*1452*3982&>&7.8*9-&9(4:1)&2*3)9-*8*+.3).3,8
1*&8*(439&(94:74++.(*<.9-&3>6:*89.43847(422*3987*,&7).3,9-*(439*3984+9-.8(477*8543)*3(*
*,&7)8
&3.*147;&9-
>)74,*414,.89 74/*(9 &3&,*7
99&(-2*398 ?#3.9*).9>4+%470;.11* *24
? 74/*(94(&9.438
? :97*&(-!:22&7>
?$*11 *(47)8
)) #$)
$ ) ),% %'!+ ""#%
Overview
We have reviewed the information provided by BrightFarms and Resource Consulting, Inc. concerning
the potential impact of a new groundwater well located on the BrightFarms site near the northeast corner
of Eldamain Road and Corneils Road. This information was provided in a series of emails between
March 22nd and April 6th.
Based on the information provided and detailed analysis conducted by EEI staff, we have concluded the
following:
x We do not believe that the City’s wells will be adversely affected by the proposed well. Only one
City well (#4) is open to this formation and there is sufficient distance between them.
x We are concerned that this well will have adverse effects on neighboring individual wells,
potentially within a mile of the proposed well. Our concerns are further detailed below.
Analysis
EEI used the raw data provided by the consultant to complete our own independent analysis.
The water level data collected from the pumping test of the BrightFarms well can be used to estimate
transmissivity of the water bearing formations using an empirical method documented by Driscoll (1986).
The 24-hour pumping test conducted by BrightFarms resulted in 151 feet of drawdown at the pumping
rate of 200 gallons per minute. Thus, the specific capacity (pumping rate divided by drawdown) of the
well is 1.32 gallon per minute (gpm) / foot of drawdown. The method developed by Driscoll estimates
transmissivity by multiplying the specific capacity in gpm / foot by 2000. Applying this method results in
an estimate of transmissivity of 2,640 gallons per day / foot, which converts to 353 feet2/day. Given that
the sandstone in the BrightFarms well was encountered between 518 and 640 feet bgs, the aquifer
thickness is taken as 122 feet. Dividing transmissivity by aquifer thickness yields hydraulic conductivity
of 2.9 feet / day. This value for hydraulic conductivity is consistent with published studies for the region
(Roadcap, 2013). A storativity value of 0.0001 is assumed based on specific storage values presented in
Meyer, 2009.
The estimated hydraulic parameters described above were used to estimate the drawdown created by the
BrightFarms well. The estimates are based on continuous pumping of the well at 200 gallons per minute
using the solution developed by Theis (1935). The table below summarizes the results of the analysis,
showing the drawdown (in feet) as a function of time (days of continuous pumping) and distance from the
well (feet).
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Krysti Barksdale Noble, Community Development Director
Date: April 7, 2022
Subject: Bright Farms – Review of Impact of Proposed Well
Distance from Pumping Well (feet)
5,000 10,000 15,000 Days of Continuous Pumping 30 19 10 4
365 40 31 22
1,825 (5 yrs.) 55 43 36
3,650 (10 yrs.) 60 49 42
Based on the analysis presented above, it is reasonable to expect that the BrightFarms well will create 40
to 60 feet of additional drawdown in farm wells located within 15,000 feet of the BrightFarms well over
the long-term. The additional drawdown may not affect the operation of individual wells around the
BrightFarms well, depending on the pump setting of the well in question. However, if an individual well
is operated in a manner that currently lowers the water level in the well to less than 40 feet above the
pump intake, the BrightFarms well may impact the operation of the well. In that case, the pump in the
affected individual well may need to be lowered for the well to be operated as it was prior to the pumping
of the BrightFarms well.
Recommendations
It is our recommendation that BrightFarms conduct a detailed survey of the pump setting and operational
characteristics of the individual wells within a mile of the proposed well. We would also recommend that
the pumps be lowered in any wells that are operating with less than 40 feet of water above the pump.
Based on our review of public records, there potentials are three to four individual wells within the
suggested area. The cost to lower these wells is not expected to be exorbitant.
References
Driscoll, F.G., 1986. Groundwater and Wells (2nd ed.), Johnson Filtration Systems, Inc., St. Paul,
Minnesota, 1089p.
Roadcap, G. C., Meyer, S., Kelly, W. R., Wehrmann, H. A., & Lin, Y-F. (2013). Groundwater Studies for
Water Supply Planning in Kendall County, IL. (ISWS Contract Report 2013-05; No. CR-2013-05).
Meyer, Scott & Roadcap, George & Lin, Yu-Feng & Walker, Douglas. (2009). Kane County Water
Resources Investigations: Simulation of Groundwater Flow in Kane County and Northeastern Illinois.
Theis, C.V., 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration
of discharge of a well using groundwater storage, Am. Geophys. Union Trans., vol. 16, pp. 519-524.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please let us know.
)) #$)
'% )
%) %$(
# ,322#
% "# "
"
%
%%(((((
#&
' % ,330#
! ",02
%
' -+,1% ! ".33 %
% % %
,31/$
%
)) #$)
*)' *##',
" "$!%( $#(" $!"# $ (<*9799,"##$" # # # &
# #" $#"#&"#! #! $ %!"# &# "###"$"## *
"!%# # #% # * ##! # #! "" # "
#& # !(!" ", &" #0
!, !# "# ! ,
##!"1' $!2&!" #%!# $ (8;*9799*# #
# # # " #& " # # $ "# # ! #!",
"&! # #" & !"" &"+
! " !# ##1- .)2/=:7/=9;/;==?
87@7> ! "
!, ## #"& &"9<# #, $!#! ##&" ""!(,
!
""/=:7/>8</@?79
87@9> ! "
",
""# $#! $ &""##:<7#0"& $ ## # "$
" # ,
!" "! !
""# % %!# '#:&"
! ! !
!, "# 0
!, "# % (
(4 3
$ / * *
"# & " # !# <7# #,
/ #
" / # ""
# !
""/ # ""
## !!" "" # %!"# " # %,
)) #$)
""%'(
COUNTY Kendall 13 - 37N - 6E
FARM
October 23, 2017DATE DRILLED
Bottom
Knierim, Ken/K & K Well Drlg.COMPANY
ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Top
Menards, Inc.
1
651GLELEVATION
LOCATION
Page
COUNTY NO.
NO.
25609
October 6, 2017 093-124Permit Date:
Total Depth
Casing:
700
10" A53 BLACK STEEL from -5' to 115'
6" A53 BLACK STEEL from -1' to 506'
Grout: BENTONITE from 0 to 115.
Grout: CLASS A NEAT CEMENT from 0 to 506.
Water from sandstone at 506' to 700'.
Static level 175' below casing top which is 2' above GL
Pumping level 280' when pumping at 65 gpm for 2 hours
Permanent pump installed at 399'
on October 30, 2017, with a capacity of 65 gpm
2611 Eldamain Rd.
Plano, IL
Location source: Global Positioning System verified
Permit #:
Address of well:
clay
sand & gravel
clay
hard gray shale w/ streaks of gray lime
brown limestone (Galena)
sandstone (St. Pete)
0
20
60
105
150
490
20
60
105
150
490
700
LATITUDE LONGITUDE
-88.50005541.666816
120932560900API
Water Well for Commercial Operation
NW NW SE
Driller's Estimated Well Yield 150+ gpmRemarks:
5101 Menard Dr. Eau Claire, WIOwner Address:
COUNTY Kendall 13 - 37N - 6E
FARM
June 28, 1996DATE DRILLED
Bottom
Sharpe, Franklin N.COMPANY
ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Top
K-Five Construction
1
0ELEVATION
LOCATION
Page
COUNTY NO.
NO.
23166
June 19, 1996Permit Date:
Total Depth
Casing:
520
8" PVC SDH 40 #200 from -2' to 153'
Grout: BENTONITE from 0 to 153.
Size hole below casing: 7.75"
Water from limestone at 153' to 520'.
Static level 112' below casing top which is 2' above GL
Pumping level 140' when pumping at 150 gpm for 4 hours
Permanent pump installed at 168'
on July 12, 1996, with a capacity of 150 gpm
Eldamain Rd.
Location source: Location from permit
Permit #:
Address of well:
clay
sand
gravel
sand
limestone
0
15
80
120
150
15
80
120
150
520
LATITUDE LONGITUDE
-88.49466941.679896
120932316600API
Non Potable Water Well
SE NW SE
concrete batch plantRemarks:
13769 Main Street Lemont, ILOwner Address:
COUNTY Kendall 7 - 37N - 7E
FARM
October 1, 1974DATE DRILLED
Bottom
Neeley, Harry C.COMPANY
ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Top
Krewde Wic Ern
1
590GLELEVATION
LOCATION
2
Page
COUNTY NO.
NO.
21229
Permit Date:
Total Depth 518
Driller's Log filed
Water Well
Permit #:
LATITUDE LONGITUDE
-88.46910641.691537
120932122900API
SE SE SE
COUNTY Kendall 18 - 37N - 7E
FARM
June 15, 1988DATE DRILLED
Bottom
Knierim, PhilCOMPANY
ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Top
Whitehurst, Walter
1
0ELEVATION
LOCATION
Page
COUNTY NO.
NO.
22312
June 16, 1988 002784Permit Date:
Total Depth
Casing:
540
5" STEEL from 0' to 42'
Grout: CUTTINGS from 0 to 0.
Size hole below casing: 5"
Water from sandstone at 150' to 540'.
Static level 150' below casing top which is 1' above GL
Pumping level 441' when pumping at 0 gpm for 0 hours
Permanent pump installed at 441'
Lot: #4 Subdivision: PritchertsAdd'l loc. info:
Location source: Location from permit
Permit #:
top soil
sand gravel
shale
rock
sandstone
0
2
15
150
496
2
15
150
496
540
LATITUDE LONGITUDE
-88.47688141.682209
120932231200API
Private Water Well
NW NW SE
owner to take sampleRemarks:
5117 R.R.#34 P.O. Box #524 Oswego, ILOwner Address:
BBrad Sanderson
COO and President
Engineering Enterprises, Inc
52 Wheeler Rd.
Sugar Grove, IL 60554
June 13, 2023
To Brad Sanderson,
Due to changes in project scope and cost, BrightFarms has determined that the location of the
temporary well drilled in early 2022 is inadequate for our new construction.
BrightFarms is proposing to cap the existing well and drill a new well closer to our current
building footprint. By capping the existing well, BrightFarms intends not to utilize it in any
capacity until future project phases are progressed. If BrightFarms deems it necessary to use
this well, notice will be given to the City of Yorkville to begin a similar review process as
previously established. Currently we do not anticipate needing this well until Phase 4 of
construction.
The new proposed well will be approximately 1,500 ft to the south and east of the existing well.
The new well will follow the same city guidelines and requirements as previously determined. It
will be drilled down to approximately 640 ft below grade surface into the sandstone formation.
As a first step in this process, BrightFarms initiated Resource Consulting, Inc. to revise the well
survey originally provided in January 2023. A survey of any new wells within the shifted 1-mile
radius influence zone specified by the City of Yorkville was completed. No additional wells were
found to be impacted. The June 2023 revised report is attached to this memo.
For next steps, BrightFarms anticipates attending the next applicable city council meeting to
review the proposed well relocation and answer any questions.
Sincerely,
Ryan Leimbach
Project Manager
BrightFarms, Inc.
$WWDFKPHQW
6/&
3 :"/&*.#"$)
3*()5"3.4/$
065)6$,)065 53&&5 6*5&
37*/(50/&8!03,
#&&" "! '$()
$ & $ % !
%& "$! %"
"$ ( !" %
&"33&*.#"$)
43&26&45&% &4063$&0/46-5*/(/$)"413&1"3&%5)*446.."3:0'5)&45"5644637&:0'5)&8&--48*5)*/
"0/&.*-&3"%*640'5)&130104&%/&88&---0$"5*0/'035)&'"$*-*5: )&.&5)0%0'3&4&"3$)"/%&7"-6"5*0/
'0--08&%5)&(6*%"/$&1307*%&%#:5)& /*5&%*5:0'!03,7*--&503*()5"3.4'035)&$633&/58&---0$"5*0/
)&3&46-540'5)"54637&:8&3&1307*%&%503*()5"3.4"/%5)&*5:*/"/6"3:0'5)*4:&"3
' $)"$"%%!%' &%
4*/(5)&--*/0*4 5"5&&0-0(*$"- 637&:>4 --*/0*4 "5&3 &-- /5&3"$5*7&"1
"7"*-"#-&"55)&'0--08*/(-*/,
)5514
*4(4*--*/0*4&%6*-8"5&3
4/05&%"55)&8*5&< &--10*/54"3&%*41-":&%#:%&'"6-5"55)&$&/5&30'5)&@@@4&$5*0/"4
%&4$3*#&%#:5)&%3*--&3= )&3&'03&50&/463&5)"5/01003-:-0$"5&%8&--4"3&07&3-00,&%"3&(*0/(3&"5&3
5)"/"0/&.*-&3"%*648"43&7*&8&%
4*/(5)& &-&$5500-0/5)&3&(*0/463306/%*/(5)&3*()5"3.4%&7&-01.&/5 &4063$&0/46-5*/(45"''
0#5"*/&%5)&8&--3&$03%*/'03."5*0/'038&--4-0$"5&%8*5)*/5)&508/4)*14&$5*0/45)"5"3&8*5)*/0/&.*-&
0'5)& *5& )*43&(*0/*44)08/0/5)&%3"8*/(13&4&/5&%*/55"$).&/5&/5*5-&%< "5&3 611-: &--4
*/ &(*0/=44)08/0/5)&."15)*43&(*0/&95&/%4#&:0/%"0/&.*-&3"%*640'5)&3*()5"3.48&--
!$ '% '( ' #*
" ) "# & #"
)&8&--*/'03."5*0/'035)&)*()-*()5&%8&--40/5)&."1*413&4&/5&%*/5)&46.."3:5"#-&*/55"$).&/5
)&8&--4)"7&#&&/4035&%*/03%&30'505"-%&15) )&%&&1&45 8&--4;(3&"5&35)"/ '&&5*/%&15)
8&3&%*4$644&%13&7*064-:*/5)&"/6"3:
8&--4637&:46.."3: )&3&."*/*/(8&--4"3&-&445)"/
'&&5*/%&15)"/%40"3&/05$0.1-&5&%*/5)&/$&-- /*5'30.8)*$)5)&/&88&--8*--0#5"*/*548"5&3
"! '% "!%
)&8&--45"5644637&:$0.1-&5&%#: &4063$&0/46-5*/(/$$0/'*3.&%5)"5/0"%%*5*0/"-8"5&34611-:
8&--4"3&13&4&/58*5)*/07&3 .*-&0'5)&3*()5"3.48&----0'5)&*/'03."5*0/13&4&/5&%"#07&*4
#"4&%0/5)&"7"*-"#-&*/'03."5*0/'30.5)& "/%*4"$$63"5&"55)&5*.&0'5)*483*5*/(&803
"%%*5*0/"-3&-&7"/5*/'03."5*0/03130+&$5%&7&-01.&/54.":"3*4&5)"5$06-%".&/%5)&4&'*/%*/(4
-&"4&$0/5"$50630''*$&8*5)"/:26&45*0/403$0..&/543&("3%*/(5)&$0/5&/540'5)*4$033&410/%&/$&
&("3%4
"/*&-037"5)
:%30(&0-0(*4530+&$5"/"(&3
55"$).&/54
;"1 "5&3 611-: &--4*/ &(*0/
; "5&3 &--/'03."5*0/ 6.."3: "#-&
&& !&
#
&$'## ) % ! "!
3URSRVHG:HOO/RFDWLRQ:HOOORFDWLRQ'DWDLQ7DEOH
&& !&
&$ !"$ & "!' $)
))*())*((' %) $#
) )*
$# )*
$) $# ,#' !!" !! ' !!' )' !!!+) $#3 )4!+) $# '# !+ $)!%) 3 )4$'") $#$'") $#$%$'") $#$))$"*"% # )3 %"49<?@;: )'!! <90>@::8A 2@@0<?>@@9 9@2;?2? ) *'()/!)' # ' "/ ! >19=1@@ 8=<8(#()$# 9=8 =<8 89<@>?9 )'!! <90>?A@A> 2@@0<A<>>A 9;2;?2> 2 +$#()'*) $# '%/'# ! #0 >1:@1A> 8=:8! "()$# 9=; =:8 9=89<>@@8 )'!! <90>A9=;? 2@@0<>A98> ?2;?2? ', '# :: !-/ ''-0 98191?< =A8
'$*#!+!=9@9<@@;= )'!! <90>@=A:= 2@@0<?<;8? 9@2;?2? )'$*/) !!#$' /$#- 9:1?1A? 8<<8, )! "()$# :>8 <<8 9:9<??A= )'!! <90?8:=?9 2@@0<>>AA? @2;?2? '(/''-$#()'*) $# # ' "/ ! :1A1@@ 8<88'$ 9>8 <88 89<@A:= )'!! <90?99?8> 2@@0<A?@<: 92;?2>
!!#$' ;; !-/ ''-0 91:91AA >?=<88! "()$#5$!$" >8 <88 9=9=99AA )'!! <90?9?; 2@@0<@=A= >2;?2? #'($#/-# # ' "/ #1 5 !!'! 0:1<1:8;@8! "()$# ;=8 ;@8 :89<>@<: )'!! <90>A>?>? 2@@0<??:;; ?2;?2? $)) # '$') 9 9 !)./0 0 ;191?< 8;=@9<>>?> )'!! <90?9;?A= 2@@0<A;8<? 92;?2> *" ')#' $ # ; ; !-/ ''-0 =191?; >?=
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
'$*#!+!:@8$!$" ) 9<8 :@8 89<?<9< )'!! <90>A@:= 2@@0<@?@9= ?2;?2? $%%#
+'# 9 9 - ( '!(5*"% 98191?@ 8:>=9<>@9> )'!! <90?8<:;9 2@@0<?::9< ?2;?2? *!).$" # ' "$"%#-/
#0 ;191?< 8:>89<@>;> )'!! <90?:88=> 2@@0<@@::; >2;?2? $-#'/ 9 9!-/ ''-0 :1:A1A> 8:>8! "()$# :88 :>8 9:9<A8>@ )'!! <90?9AA;A 2@@0<A@8; 92;?2> %%!/' # 9 9 !-/' 0 ?19@188 8:>8! "()$# >: :>8 :89=98;@ )'!! <90?9>>@: 2@@0<@;;A> >2;?2? * *()-# /*!5! 9 9 !-/' 0 @1:819< ?99
'$*#!+!:>8! "()$#5( ! 9<8 :>8 9=9=98>: )'!! <90?: 2@@0<@>999 >2;?2?
$()'$/)' 9 9 !-/' 0 :1>19> ?;:
'$*#!+!:>8! "()$#5( ! 9<@ :>8 :89=9899 )'!! <90?9:?:A 2@@0<AA8?= 92;?2> !+ #/$" ) ##))/+ >1<1A::=8! "()$# A8 :=89<=@;@ )'!! <90>?>:?> 2@@0<A>A< 9;2;?2> ' ) 9191<@ >=9
'$*#!+!:<;! " 9=< :<; 89<>;?< )'!! <90?9@:@@ 2@@0<?<AA; >2;?2? !( "! # # ' "$"%#-/
#0 =191?9 8::89=8?:; )'!! <90?9@=;; 2@@0<@?8@; >2;?2? $(($# /' !)'(/
''- ;1:=199 =9>:8='$ ;:8 ;>8 :89<?99< )'!! <90>A<9== 2@@0<?;9@: ?2;?2? !'$-" # ' "$"%#-/
#0 981;91?> 8:889<?9@> )'!! <90?9;@?: 2@@0<@@8A@ >2;?2? -'$# *%%!- # ' "$"%#-/
#0 98191?? 8:889<?=;= )'!! <90>@>8== 2@@0<<?A@9 9>2;?2? ( '/# !-/ ''-0 981A1@; 8:88! "()$# 9=8 :88 :89<@9<= )'!! <90>??8?< 2@@0<>>;;> 9?2;?2? !! (/
''- 9 9 !-/ ''-0 >1:>1A9 ><=
'$*#!+!:88! "()$# 9;A :88 89=8;A: )'!! <90?:8=;; 2@@0<@?;9? >2;?2? +! * !'( $,&* %"#) @1:18?:88! "()$# 9:A :88 :=9<?>>< )'!! <90>A8;;9 2@@0<>=;<@ 9?2;?2? ##))/
$#' !-/ ''-0 ?19A1@> >=8
'$*#!+!9A=! "()$# 9=9 9A= ;:9<?9A= )'!! <90>?>>? 2@@0<?A<8: 9@2;?2? $"" ($# # ' "$"%#-/
#0 =191?? >=89@='$ @8 9@= ;9=8:@9 )'!! <90?9@89? 2@@0<@?=>? >2;?2? *()$" $"( '$,#/', # >1:18> ><=9@8'$ '- 9== ;89<?@8A )'!! <90>@;=8< 2@@0<A889> 9;2;?2> ( $"* !'( # ' "/ ! >19<1@@ 89?<(# '+! 9<8 9?< 89<>@9= )'!! <90>A;@<? 2@@0<@;??: ?2;?2?
)
-## # ' "$"%#-/
#0 98191?; 89?89<??8? )'!! <90?9=@> 2@@0<A;8A 92;?2> !" - /! # ' "/ ! <1981@? 89?8( ! 8889<>A8< )'!! <90?88?<= 2@@0<>>A:: @2;?2? *'$'! )$%
# # ' "$"%#-/
#0 :191?< 89>99<>8;9 )'!! <90?8=@>? 2@@0=8?<@A 92;?2> 5 9 9 ! # !!$' (
#0 A191>< >@=9>8 8889<>>9= )'!! <90>A>:>: 2@@0<A8;89 9:2;?2> '()#!- # ' "$"%#-/
#0 9:191?: >?89>8! "()$# ;: 9>8 =89<@A@= )'!! <90?:889< 2@@0<A8?== 92;?2> #/## ( '$,#/', # =1:@1AA 89>8( ! 9<@ 9=: 89<@A@> )'!! <90?9AAA 2@@0<A;9@ 92;?2> / $(% 5 # 9 9 ! # /$') ?1:@1AA 89>8! "()$# 9=8 9>8 89<?AA? )'!! <90>@:8=9 2@@0<A889> 9;2;?2> -)'/ '- # ' "/ ! =1981@A 89<9!- 988 9<9 89<??@= )'!! <90?9?AA? 2@@0<@@9@ >2;?2? + ($#/00 # ' "/ ! 9919;1@? 89<88 9<8 89<>;89 )'!! <90?8<@9? 2@@0<=:<8? @2;?2? #((' ' !)./0 0 =191?8 >==
'$*#!+!9;99<>;>> )'!! <90?9;>AA 2@@0=8?=?? 92;?2> *'$' )- -2?9 -2?9
-#()'#$0/
#0 9191?9 >@8
'$*#!+!98@ 8889<>;>= )'!! <90?99A=A 2@@0<@:@8? >2;?2? *'$' )- %'2?9 %'2?9
-#()'#$0/
#0 9191?9 898:8889<><:; )') '% <90>@><:? 2@@0<?;89> 9@2;?2? ))$!*'+-
-#()'#$0/
#0 =191?9 >=8
'$*#!+!989 8889<?<9; )'!! <90>A><;> 2@@0<@??@? ?2;?2? "#!-)$# # ' "/ "( ' ;191@8 89899<?=;@ )'!! <90>?=@8: 2@@0<<A9?> :82;?2? $#$+'* !'( # ' "/ ! A1:91@; 8988'$ 9= 988 :89<?=:A )'!! <90?8=?9? 2@@0<@=;: >2;?2? "##/!-)$# # ' "/ ! ?1:?1@< 8A@'$ <8 A@ 89<@89; )'!! <90>A@:= 2@@0<@?@9= ?2;?2? "##/
''- # ' "/ ! A1?1A8 8A>(# '+! <8 A> 89<@:;? )'!! <90>@@== 2@@0<<A;< 9?2;?2? ' #(
#0 # ' "/ ! @1:@1A: 8A>(#5 '+! 98 A> 89<@<9A )'!! <90?89@?A 2@@0<@?@?9 ?2;?2? "#/$"5## '$,#/', # =1;91A< 8A;(# '+! @; A; 89<=A8@ # #' # <90?99@>< 2@@0<@<A=? >2;?2?
!!)'$ 2<< 2<<
-#()'#$0/
#0 9191>: >@=
'$*#!+!A99<>8<= )'!! <90>@>8:@ 2@@0<=A=AA 9?2;?2? '
!"'5$#/0
0 9191>> >=8
'$*#!+!@>( ! ?=@>989<@89: )'!! <90?8:::A 2@@0<??;A ?2;?2? 5'* # 1 # ' "/ ! ;19;1A8 8@8(# '+! ;8 @8 89=8A:9 # #' # <90>@<A:@ 2@@0=8@?8A 9<2;?2> $""$#,!) ($#$:@< :@< () # '+ $'%$') $# =19A1?:>89=8A:> # #' # <90>@<A@? 2@@0<@>;; 9@2;?2? $""$#,!) ($#$:@A :@A () # '+ $'%$') $# <1:81?;==9=8A9A # #' # <90>?A:=; 2@@0=8@=A 9<2;?2> $""$#,!) ($#$:@: :@: () # '+ $'%$') $# <1:91?;=8
'+&/)/ *'!,/&+)( #..!*-*-&- -#)- #-
' '
,"'("-(+&'+&/*' *'!-'&.., #..!*-(),) ,#)- #-
) )
,"')"-(+&'+&/*+ *'!-',)+' #..!*+,'') +#)- #-
'( '(
''"(*"-(+&'+&/*. *'!,/'&-. #..!*-+++ -#)- #-
(// (//
+&'+&/*/ *'!,/*,() #..!*-*..) -#)- #-
)&& )&&
+&'+&/+& *'!,/.(', #..!*-*'/) -#)- #-
)&' )&'
+&'+&/+' *'!-&'-,( #..!*-*)'( -#)- #-
)&( )&(
+&'+&/+( *'!-&+&,/ #..!*-*(.. -#)- #-
)&) )&)
+&'+&/+) *'!-&.*(* #..!*-('-' ,#)- #-
)&* )&*
+&'+&/+* *'!-'(&,+ #..!*-(('. ,#)- #-
)&+ )&+
+&'+&/++ *'!-'+--- #..!*-((,, ,#)- #-
)&, )&,
+&'+&/+, *'!-'+./, #..!*-&)., ,#)- #-
)&- )&-
+&'+&/+. *'!-',&+' #..!*,+'-/ +#)- #-
)&/ )&/
+&'+&/+/ *'!-',&-) #..!*,(+)- +#)- #-
)'& )'&
+&'+&/,& *'!-','-( #..!*+//* +#)- #-
)'' )''
+&'+&/,' *'!-',((- #..!*+-)' +#)- #-
)'( )'(
+&'+&/,( *'!-',(/) #..!*+*-(* +#)- #-
)') )')
+&'+&/,) *'!-',)+/ #..!*+(&.( +#)- #-
)'* )'*
+&'+&/(& *'!,.(&.* #..!+&.,*/ '*#)- #,
(.) (.)
*+'+&/(( *'!,.*/,) #..!+&**/- ')#)- #,
(.+ (.+
*+'+&/() *'!,.*/,) #..!*///&+ ')#)- #,
(., (.,
*+'+&/(* *'!,.*/,) #..!*/+**) ')#)- #,
(.- (.-
*+'+&/(+ *'!,.*/+' #..!*/&.,) ')#)- #,
(.. (..
*+'+&/+- *'!-'+/+( #..!*,--.- +#)- #-
)&. )&.
*+'+&/,* *'!-',*+. #..!**/+&- +#)- #-
)'+ )'+
*+'*/)&, *'!-&&&'. #..!*,&--( .#)- #-
!
#' #'
# & *&'+&/(- *'!,.)'&- #..!*.'.+- '.#)- #-
(/& (/&
."(-"-))&'+&/*& *'!,/-.'. #..!*-*+') -#)- #-
( (
,"'/"-()&'*/)&- *'!,/,)-+ #..!*,&,(( .#)- #-
!
#+ #+
# & (+
3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,\\\\\\,,,,,,333,,333,,,33,,33,,,3,,33,,333333,333,33,,3333,,,,,33,,,33,,33,,,3,,333,,,,,,,,,3,,,333,33,,333,,,,,,3333333,,,,,333,,,33333,,,,,,3333,,,,,33333,,,,,,,3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333,,\\3,,3,3,3,,3,33333,,,3,3,,,333,3,3,,33,3,3,3,3,3,3,,,,3,33,3,3,3,33,,33,3
333333,33333,,,,,,,,,33333333
3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,33,,33,,33,3,3
,,,3333333333
,,
3,,,,,,,,,,3,3,3,33
\\3,3,333333333
3,333 3,,333,3,,,,,33333 3,3,,,3,
3,3,333,,3,333,33,3,33,,3 3,3,33 3,3,33,3,3 3,3,3,3,,,3,33,,333,3,,
33333777777776%-2;%8)6()8)28-32&%7-2*366)97)&38831)0): &)61)0): 74-00;%=)0): 6%-2;%8)6()8)28-32&%7-2*366)97)&38831)0): &)61)0): 74-00;%=)0): 6%-2;%8)6()8)28-32&%7-2*366)97)&38831)0): &)61)0): 74-00;%=)0): 6%-2;%8)6()8)28-32&%7-2*366)97)&38831)0): &)61)0): 74-00;%=)0): ;)8&3883178361;%8)6()8)28-32&%7-28343*&)61)0):!,-+,;%8)60):)0!2361%0;%8)60):)0!432(&38831! ;;;;;;;;;)0003'%8-32&=38,)67;%8)67)6:-')8=4)%2(7->)&=38,)67 \ 4%6/-2+74%')7 8=4
)1403=))%'')77-&0) -2'0:%2
!838%0 ,)%(,397)7***)! ,)%(,397)7***)! +6))2,397)+6))2,397)+6))2,397)+6))2,397)+6))2,397)+6))2,397)+6))2,397)+6))2,397) 7-+2 *6328&9-0(-2+7)8&%'/ *6328&9-0(-2+7)8&%'/4,%7)4,%7)13(90) 7***)! 13(90) 7***)! 13(90) 7***)! 13(90) 7***)! 4,%7)4,%7)4,%7)*-6)869'/8962%6392(%6)%+6%:)063%(*361%-28)2%2')
*-6)4638)'8-32%'')777))()8%-0++++++++++++++9)9)9)9)9)+%70-2)+%70-2)*-6),=(6%2892()6+6392()0)'86-'0-2)7%2-8%6=7);)6&=38,)677%2-8%6=7);)60%8)6%0 '322)'8-3283&)'336(-2%8)(;-8,=&7(
)<8)62%003%(-2+&)68,7)<8)62%003%(-2+&)68,7(3'/%6)%6)-2*36')('32'6)8)4%((3'/%6)%6)-2*36')('32'6)8)4%(86%7,(91478)6 \ 98-0-8=)%7)1)28 98-0-8=)%7)1)28 463437)(6-+,83*;%= 98-0-8=)%7)1)28*-6)()4%681)28746-2/0)6'322)'8-32*-6)()4%681)28746-2/0)6'322)'8-327%2-8%6=7);)6&=38,)67 98-0-8=)%7)1)28 49&0-'98-0-8=)%7)1)287,))8237,))88-80)6):(%8) '311)287 &= ',/(-779)6):-7-327463.)'8'0-)28463.)'82S (6%;2&= '64 ',)'/)(&= 2007'%0) (%8) %77,3;2CITY OF YORKVILLEKENDALL COUNTYILLINOIS50 S. BUCKHOUT ST.SUITE 202IRVINGTON, NY 10533 13263) 786))87)0-27+63:) 4% 4,32) [[[PMZMGGMZMPGSQ%00'328)2873*8,-740%2%6)46346-)8%6=%2(7,%00 238 &) 6)463(9')( 36 98-0->)( *36 %2=496437) ;-8,398 46-36 ;6-88)2 %98,36->%8-32*631 0-:-' '-:-0 00' 320= %4463:)( 7)%0)( 40%277,%00 &) -140)1)28)( *36 '327869'8-32 496437)7k 0-:-' '-:-0 00'79-8) &988)6*-)0(63%(79-8)(3;2)67+63:)-04,32)
78361;%8)6()7-+2&= '(& 200 '327869'8-32(6%;-2+74)2(-2+'-8=%4463:%0 '64 200 '327869'8-32(6%;-2+74)2(-2+'-8=%4463:%0 '64 200 '327869'8-32(6%;-2+74)2(-2+'-8=%4463:%0 '64 200 '327869'8-32(6%;-2+74)2(-2+'-8=%4463:%0 '64 200 *8,36->328%07'%0) -2',!*))8'4,%7-2+40%298-0-8=238) *364%:)1)28-2*361%8-327))7,))87''N238) 6)*)6)2')40%27,))87'*367%2-8%6=7);)60%8)6%0463*-0)%2(-2:)68)0):%8-327238) 8,)1%<-19174%'-2+&)8;))27%2-8%6=7);)61%2,30)7-7*396,92(6)(
*))8%'')7763%(%'')7763%(Test well will be capped and sealed, willnot be used. Well contractor will pullappropriate permits with Kendall Countyand provide affidavit as required.120'-0"Well location isbeing moved +/-1800' to thesouth eastAt County required separation of +/- 75' from the northwest corner of the Headhouse Building:- (1) new well will be drilled 640' in depth with the previously approved 200 GPM max pump. Depth & GPMof well match previously approved wellNote - we are not requesting to use any additional water, just requesting to move the well closer to thebuilding to minimize required infrastructure.
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #4
Tracking Number
PW 2023-60
Grande Reserve – Signage Recommendations
Public Works Committee – July 18, 2023
Majority
Approval
Review of Recommendations
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
With the continuous build-out of the Grande Reserve development, an updated review of the
signage within the development was warranted. The intersections noted in the attached exhibit
were each analyzed based on MUTCD standards for possible signage modifications. For
reference, detailed reports for each intersection are attached.
A summary of the recommendations is noted below:
1. Grande Trail and American Way
a. Add stop sign to American Way – south leg; currently a yield sign exists.
2. Grande Trail and Freedom Place
a. Create three-way stop; currently a stop sign exists on the west leg.
3. Grande Trail and Justice Drive
a. Create three-way stop; currently it is uncontrolled.
4. Grande Trail and McClellan Boulevard – North
a. Add stop sign to McClellan – south leg; currently it is uncontrolled.
5. Grande Trail and McClellan Boulevard – South
a. Create four-way stop; currently yields exist on the north and south legs.
6. Berrywood Lane and Seely Street
a. Add stop sign to Seely – south leg; currently a stop sign exists on the north leg.
7. Grande Trail and Sunset Avenue
a. Add stop sign to Sunset – west leg; currently a yield sign exists.
If you have any questions, please let us know.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Krysti Barksdale Noble, Community Development Director
Date: June 26, 2023
Subject: Grande Reserve – Signage Recommendations
()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-(
)-
(
)-
(
)-()-(
)-
(
)
-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-
()-
()-
()-
()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-
()-()-()-()-()DRIVEWAYOAKLA
WN
BERESFORD
EM
E
R
A
L
D PINERIDGERIVERWOODBURR HOBBSROUTE 34OLD
GLORY
J
U
S
T
I
C
E
SH
O
E
G
E
R
TUSCANYD
A
V
I
DMATLOC
KCRYD
E
RROYALOAKS PRE
S
T
O
N
GRA
N
D
E
TRAI
L
L
Y
N
C
L
I
F
F
LEWIS
EDYT HEBAILEY
CHAR
L
E
S
ALDENBRIST O L
PATRIOTGRANDESHOEGERSEELEY
MCLELLANL
Y
MANAMO
S CONSTITUTIONLINDE
N RICKARDCANYON
HE
N
N
I
N
G ALLEGIANCEHAVENHILLBERRYWOOD
MILL
HOLLY
ANNA MARIA
RIVERW
O
OD
LYNCLIFFSUN DOW
N
PRIVATE
DRIVE
REHBEHNL
A
V
E
N
D
E
R SUNSETHOBBSPRIVATEDRIVEMILL BRADYLEHMANFR EED OM
BURRGALENA
BISSELROODJETERKENNEDYAMERI
CANPARKWAYD
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
ROY
A
L
OA
K
S
B
R
I
S
TO
L
R
I
DG
E
DRIV
E
W
A
Y
OLD GLORYPRIVATEDRIVECRYDERJUSTICEELLSWORTHCRANSTONS
Q
U
I
R
E
Engineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
STOP SIGN JUSTIFICATION
GRANDE RESERVE
LOCATION MAPwww.eeiweb.com DATE
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
YO1107_Grande Trail Intersection Overall.MXD
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2023\
MJT
NO.REVISIONS ³United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350www.yorkville.il.us
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Legend
()-Yorkville Boundary
GRANDE TRL & FREEDOM PLACE
CREATE - 3 WAY STOP
GRANDE TRL & MCLELLAN BLVD (N)
ADD STOP SIGN - SOUTH LEG
GRANDE TRL & MCLELLAN BLVD (S)
CREATE - 4 WAY STOP
GRANDE TRL & AMERICAN WAY
ADD STOP SIGN - SOUTH LEG
GRANDE TRL & SUNSET AVE
ADD STOP SIGN - WEST LEG
GRANDE TRL & JUSTICE DR
CREATE - 3 WAY STOP
BERRYWOOD LN & SEELEY ST
ADD STOP SIGN - SOUTH LEG
As requested, we investigated the possible installation of two way yield or stop signs at the
intersection of*UDQGH7UDLODQG$PHULFDQ:D\. Our findings were as follows:
•Currently the intersection is controlled by D \LHOG VLJQ RQ $PHULFDQ :D\.
•The intersection at Grande Trail and $PHULFDQ :D\ does not appear to have any sight distance
constraints and appears to be “open”.
•The governing entity on traffic control signage is the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). The manual states as follows in regards to yield or stop sign installation:Guidance:
Engineering MXGJPHQW should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors
should be considered:
$Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches;
%Number and angle of approaches;
&Approach speeds;
'Sight distance available on each approach; and
( 5HSRUWHGFUDVKH[SHULHQFH
<,(/'RU6723VLJQVVKRXOGEHXVHGDWDQLQWHUVHFWLRQLIRQHRUPRUHRIWKHIROORZLQJ
FRQGLWLRQVH[LVW
$$QLQWHUVHFWLRQRIDOHVVLPSRUWDQWURDGZLWKDPDLQURDGZKHUHDSSOLFDWLRQRIWKHQRUPDO
ULJKWRIZD\UXOHZRXOG QRWEHH[SHFWHGWRSURYLGHUHDVRQDEOHFRPSOLDQFHZLWKWKHODZ
%A street entering a designed through highway or street; and/or
& $QXQVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQLQDVLJQDOL]HGDUHD
,QDGGLWLRQWKHXVHRI<,(/'RU6723VLJQVVKRXOGEHFRQVLGHUHGDWWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQRIWZR
PLQRUVWUHHWVRUORFDOURDGVZKHUHWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQKDVPRUHWKDQWKUHHDSSURDFKHVDQGZKHUH
RQHRUPRUHRIWKHIROORZLQJFRQGLWLRQVH[LVW
$The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all
approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day;
%The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user
to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is
necessary; and/or
& &UDVKUHFRUGVLQGLFDWHWKDWILYHRUPRUHFUDVKHVWKDWLQYROYHWKHIDLOXUHWR\LHOGWKHULJKW
RIZD\DWWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQXQGHUWKHQRUPDOULJKWRIZD\UXOHKDYHEHHQUHSRUWHGZLWKLQD
\HDUSHULRGRUWKDWWKUHHRUPRUHVXFKFUDVKHVKDYHEHHQUHSRUWHGZLWKLQD\HDUSHULRG
7KHPDQXDODOVRVWDWHVDVIROORZVLQUHJDUGVWRVWRSVLJQLQVWDOODWLRQ
<LHOGRU6WRSVLJQVVKRXOGQRWEHXVHGIRUVSHHGFRQWURO
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Adddministttttratorrr
From: Brad Sanddder
y
rson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Directorr of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble,Community Dev. Dir.
Jori Behlanddd, City Clerkkkk
Date: 5//2023
Subjectt:*UDQGH7UDLODQG$PHULFDQ:D\
7KHDSSOLFDWLRQRIQRUPDOULJKWRIZD\UXOHLVH[SHFWHGWRSURYLGHUHDVRQDEOHFRPSOLDQFHIRUWKLVLQWHUVHFWLRQ7KLV
LQWHUVHFWLRQLVQRWLQDVLJQDOL]HGDUHD$PHULFDQ:D\DQG*UDQGH7UDLORQO\KDVWKUHHDSSURDFKHV$PHULFDQ:D\
DSSURDFKHV*UDQGH7UDLOZKLFKLVDWKURXJKVWUHHW7KLVPDNHV$PHULFDQ:D\DJRRGFDQGLGDWHIRUDVWRSVLJQ
LQVWDOODWLRQ
Location: GUDQGH7UDLODQG$PHULFDQ:D\
Criteria Met Criteria**
Yes
Additional
Study
Required No
A.
B.
C. An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area.
A.
B.
C.
A.Criteria are clearly met recommending installation of a YIELD or STOP sign (Circle designated sign type)
Designate Location: $PHULFDQ:D\
%Criteria are not clearly met at this time - no further action recommended
&Criteria may or may not be met - additional engineering study required
By: Date:
Title
By: Date:
Title
* Based upon Professional Engineer's Review
** Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)G:\Public\Hampshire\2023\HA2307-V Gast & Highbrook Stop Sign Study\Eng\[Two Way Yield or Stop Evaluation Form.xls]Sheet1
The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more than
2,000 units per day;
C. Approach speeds;
D. Sight distance available on each approach; and
E. Reported crash experience.
II. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local
roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions
exist:
I. YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist:
81,7('&,7<2)<25.9,//(
TWO WAY STOP
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Evaluation Criteria
Guidance: Engineering judgement should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors should be considered:
A. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches;
B. Number and angle of approaches;
Based on a preliminary review of the criteria for a YIELD or STOP sign the following action is recommended:
The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with
the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and/or
Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way at the intersection under
the normal right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been
reported within a 2-year period.
An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule would not be
expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law.
A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or
X
X
X
X
[
[
dž
72'':(//6
6(1,25352-(&7(1*,1((5,,
%5$'6$1'(5621
&+,()23(5$7,1*2)),&(535(6,'(17
Grand
e
T
r
l Grande TrlBurr StBurr StHobbs
L
n
Burr Ct Crans
ton
C
i
r
Amer
ican
Way
Copyright nearmap 2015
WalshEngineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
GRANDE TRAIL & AMERICAN WAY
STOP SIGN ANALYSIS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350 ³
200 0 200100 Feet
YO1107_Grande Trail & American Way Stop Analysis - Existing
EXISTING YIELD
CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
%&'(
Grand
e
T
r
l Grande TrlBurr StBurr StHobbs
L
n
Burr Ct Crans
ton
C
i
r
Amer
ican
Way
Copyright nearmap 2015
WalshEngineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
GRANDE TRAIL & AMERICAN WAY
STOP SIGN ANALYSIS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350 ³
200 0 200100 Feet
YO1107_Grande Trail & American Way Stop Analysis - Proposed
PROPOSED STOP
CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
!"$
American Way and Grande Trail
Intersection Photos
Northbound approach, looking North
Northbound approach, looking West
American Way and Grande Trail
Intersection Photos
Northbound approach, looking East
Eastbound approach, looking East
American Way and Grande Trail
Intersection Photos
Eastbound approach, looking South
Westbound approach, looking West
American Way and Grande Trail
Intersection Photos
Westbound approach, looking South
As requested, we investigated the possible installation of multi-way stop signs at the intersection
of *UDQGH7UDLODQG)UHHGRP3ODFHOur findings were as follows:
x Currently the intersection isFRQWUROOHGE\VWRSVLJQRQ)UHHGRP3ODFH
x The intersection at *UDQGH7UDLODQG)UHHGRP3ODFHKDVRFFDVLRQDOVLJKWFRQVWUDLQWVGXHWRSDUNHG
YHKLFOHVRQ*UDQGH7UDLO.
x The governing entity on traffic control signage is the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). The manual states as follows in regards to multi-way stop sign installation:Guidance:
The decision to install multi-way stop control should be based on an engineering study.
The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign
installation:
$Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be
installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the
traffic control signal.
%Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a
multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as
right-angle collisions.
&Minimum volumes:
The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of
both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average
day; and
The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection fromthe
minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units perhour
for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of atleast 30
seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but
If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the
minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and
2.
'Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80
percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
Option:
Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include:
A. The need to control left-turn conflicts;
Memorandum
To:Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Date: 5/18/2023
Subject:*UDQGH7UDLODQG)UHHGRP3ODFH
B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian
volumes;
C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to
negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design
and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational
characteristics of the intersection.
x The manual also states as follows in regards to stop sign installation:
Yield or Stop signs should not be used for speed control.
The traffic volume on the major street approach would appear to be below the average of 300 vehicles
per hour and the traffic volume on the minor street approach would appear to be below the average of 200
units per hour for any 8 hours of an average day.3DUNHGYHKLFOHVDORQJ*UDQGH7UDLOFRXOGEHDVLJKW
FRQVWUDLQWIRUWKLVLQWHUVHFWLRQ 7KLVLVDQDUHDZLWKKLJKSHGHVWULDQYROXPHVGXHWRWKHYLFLQLW\WRWKH
VFKRRO'XHWRWKHKLJKQXPEHURISHGHVWULDQVDQGVLJKWFRQVWUDLQWVWKLVintersection LV a good candidate
for a multi-way stopbased on the above criteria.6WRSVLJQVVKRXOGEHLPSOHPHQWHGDWDOODSSURDFKHVWR
WKLVLQWHUVHFWLRQ
Location:
Criteria Met Criteria**
Yes
Additional
Study
Required No
A.
B.
C. Minimum Volumes:
1.
2.
3.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Criteria are clearly met recommending installation of a multi-way stop
Criteria are not clearly met at this time - no further action recommended
Criteria may or may not be met - additional engineering study required
By:7RGG:HOOV Date:
6(1,25PROJECT ENGINEER,,
Title
By: Date:
Title
* Based upon Professional Engineer's Review 10/10/2013
** Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control
traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.
Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such
crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
The vehicular volume entering the intersections from the major street approaches (total of both approaches)averages
at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and
The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersections from the minor street approaches
(total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-
street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but
81,7('&,7<2)<25.9,//(
MULTI-WAY STOP
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Primary Criteria to Consider*
If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume
warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.
Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1 and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum
values, criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
Based on a preliminary review of the criteria for a multi-way stop sign the following action is recommended:
The need to control left-turn conflicts;
The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;
Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless
conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics
where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Xdž
X
*UDQGH7UDLODQG Freedom Place
%UDG6DQGHUVRQ
&+,()23(5$7,1*2)),&(535(6,'(17
dž
[
dž
Grande TrlGrande Trl
Constit
uti
o
n
WayJeter CtFreedom Pl
Copyright nearmap 2015
WalshEngineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
GRANDE TRAIL & FREEDOM PL.
STOP SIGN ANALYSIS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350 ³
200 0 200100 Feet
YO1107_Grande Trail & Freedom Pl. Stop Analysis
EXISTING STOP
CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
!"$
Grande TrlGrande Trl
Constit
uti
o
n
WayJeter CtFreedom Pl
Copyright nearmap 2015
WalshEngineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
GRANDE TRAIL & FREEDOM PL.
STOP SIGN ANALYSIS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350 ³
200 0 200100 Feet
YO1107_Grande Trail & Freedom Pl. Stop Analysis - Proposed
PROPOSED STOP
CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
!"$!"$
!"$
Freedom Pl and Grande Trail
Intersection photos
Southbound approach, looking South
Southbound approach, looking West
Freedom Pl and Grande Trail
Intersection photos
Northbound approach, looking North
Northbound approach, looking West
Freedom Pl and Grande Trail
Intersection photos
Eastbound approach, looking East
Eastbound approach, looking North
Freedom Pl and Grande Trail
Intersection photos
Eastbound approach, looking South
As requested, we investigated the possible installation of multi-way stop signs at the intersection
of *UDQGH7UDLODQG-XVWLFH'ULYH. Our findings were as follows:
x Currently the intersection isXQFRQWUROOHG
x The intersection at *UDQGH7UDLODQG-XVWLFH'ULYHdoes not appear to have any sight distance
constraints and appears to be “open”.
x The governing entity on traffic control signage is the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). The manual states as follows in regards to multi-way stop sign installation:Guidance:
The decision to install multi-way stop control should be based on an engineering study.
The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign
installation:
$Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be
installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the
traffic control signal.
%Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a
multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as
right-angle collisions.
&Minimum volumes:
The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of
both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average
day; and
The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from
the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per
hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at
least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but
If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the
minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and
2.
'Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80
percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
Option:
Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include:
A. The need to control left-turn conflicts;
Memorandum
To:Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Date: 5/18/2023
Subject:*UDQGH7UDLODQG-XVWLFH'ULYH
B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian
volumes;
C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to
negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design
and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational
characteristics of the intersection.
x The manual also states as follows in regards to stop sign installation:
Yield or Stop signs should not be used for speed control.
The traffic volume on the major street approach would appear to be below the average of 300 vehicles
per hour and the traffic volume on the minor street approach would appear to be below the average of 200
units per hour for any 8 hours of an average day. There are no sight distance constraints7KLVLVDQDUHD
ZLWKKLJKSHGHVWULDQYROXPHVGXHWRWKHELNHSDWKOHDGLQJWRWKHSDUNDQGVFKRRO'XHWRWKHKLJKQXPEHU
RISHGHVWULDQVWKLVintersection LV a good candidate for a multi-way stop based on the above criteria.6WRS
VLJQVVKRXOGEHLPSOHPHQWHGDWDOODSSURDFKHVWRWKLVLQWHUVHFWLRQ
Location:
Criteria Met Criteria**
Yes
Additional
Study
Required No
A.
B.
C. Minimum Volumes:
1.
2.
3.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Criteria are clearly met recommending installation of a multi-way stop
Criteria are not clearly met at this time - no further action recommended
Criteria may or may not be met - additional engineering study required
By:7RGG:HOOV Date:
6(1,25PROJECT ENGINEER,,
Title
By: Date:
Title
* Based upon Professional Engineer's Review 10/10/2013
** Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control
traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.
Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such
crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
The vehicular volume entering the intersections from the major street approaches (total of both approaches)averages
at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and
The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersections from the minor street approaches
(total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-
street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but
81,7('&,7<2)<25.9,//(
MULTI-WAY STOP
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Primary Criteria to Consider*
If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume
warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.
Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1 and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum
values, criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
Based on a preliminary review of the criteria for a multi-way stop sign the following action is recommended:
The need to control left-turn conflicts;
The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;
Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless
conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics
where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Xdž
X
*UDQGH7UDLODQG-XVWLFH'ULYH
%UDG6DQGHUVRQ
&+,()23(5$7,1*2)),&(535(6,'(17
dž
[
Ellsw
ort
h
Dr
Grande Trl
Grande
T
r
lJustice Dr
Copyright nearmap 2015
WalshEngineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
GRANDE TRAIL & JUSTICE DR.
STOP SIGN ANALYSIS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350 ³
200 0 200100 Feet
YO1107_Grande Trail & Justice Dr. Stop Analysis - Existing
UNCONTROLLED INTERSECTION
Ellsw
ort
h
Dr
Grande Trl
Grande
T
r
lJustice Dr
Copyright nearmap 2015
WalshEngineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
GRANDE TRAIL & JUSTICE DR.
STOP SIGN ANALYSIS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350 ³
200 0 200100 Feet
YO1107_Grande Trail & Justice Dr. Stop Analysis - Proposed
PROPOSED STOP
CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
!"$
!"$
!"$
Justice Drive and Grande Trail
Intersection Photos
Westbound approach, looking West
Westbound approach, looking North
Justice Drive and Grande Trail
Intersection Photos
Eastbound approach, looking East
Eastbound approach, looking North
Justice Drive and Grande Trail
Intersection Photos
Southbound approach, looking South
Southbound approach, looking East
Justice Drive and Grande Trail
Intersection Photos
Southbound approach, looking West
As requested, we investigated the possible installation of two way yield or stop signs at
the intersection of *UDQGH 7UDLO DQG 0F/HOODQ%OYG. Our findings were as follows:
•Currently the intersection is XQFRQWUROOHG.
•The intersection at Grande Trail and 0F/HOODQ%OYGdoes not appear to have any sight distance
constraints and appears to be “open”.
•The governing entity on traffic control signage is the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). The manual states as follows in regards to yield or stop sign installation:Guidance:
Engineering judgment should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors
should be considered:
$Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches;
%Number and angle of approaches;
&Approach speeds;
'Sight distance available on each approach; and
( 5HSRUWHGFUDVKH[SHULHQFH
<,(/' RU 6723 VLJQV VKRXOG EH XVHG DW DQ LQWHUVHFWLRQ LI RQH RU PRUH RI WKH IROORZLQJ
FRQGLWLRQV H[LVW
$$Q LQWHUVHFWLRQ RI D OHVV LPSRUWDQW URDG ZLWK D PDLQ URDG ZKHUH DSSOLFDWLRQ RI WKH QRUPDO
ULJKWRIZD\ UXOH ZRXOGQRW EH H[SHFWHG WR SURYLGH UHDVRQDEOH FRPSOLDQFH ZLWK WKH ODZ
%A street entering a designed through highway or street; and/or
& $QXQVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQLQDVLJQDOL]HGDUHD
,QDGGLWLRQWKHXVHRI<,(/'RU6723VLJQVVKRXOGEHFRQVLGHUHGDWWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQRIWZR
PLQRUVWUHHWVRUORFDOURDGVZKHUHWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQKDVPRUHWKDQWKUHHDSSURDFKHVDQGZKHUH
RQHRUPRUHRIWKHIROORZLQJFRQGLWLRQVH[LVW
$The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all
approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day;
%The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user
to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is
necessary; and/or
& &UDVKUHFRUGVLQGLFDWHWKDWILYHRUPRUHFUDVKHVWKDWLQYROYHWKHIDLOXUHWR\LHOGWKHULJKW
RIZD\DWWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQXQGHUWKHQRUPDOULJKWRIZD\UXOHKDYHEHHQUHSRUWHGZLWKLQD
\HDUSHULRGRUWKDWWKUHHRUPRUHVXFKFUDVKHVKDYHEHHQUHSRUWHGZLWKLQD\HDUSHULRG
7KHPDQXDODOVRVWDWHVWKHIROORZLQJLQUHJDUGVWRVWRSRU\LHOGVLJQLQVWDOODWLRQ
<LHOGRU6WRSVLJQVVKRXOGQRWEHXVHGIRUVSHHGFRQWURO
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Adddministttttratorrr
From: Brad Sanddder
y
rson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Directorr of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble,Community Dev. Dir.
Jori Behlanddd, City Clerkkkk
Date: 5//2023
Subjectt:*UDQGH7UDLODQG 0F/HOODQ%RXOHYDUG 1RUWK,QWHUVHFWLRQ
7KHDSSOLFDWLRQRIQRUPDOULJKWRIZD\UXOHLVH[SHFWHGWRSURYLGHUHDVRQDEOHFRPSOLDQFHIRUWKLVLQWHUVHFWLRQ7KLV
LQWHUVHFWLRQLVQRWLQDVLJQDOL]HGDUHD7KLVLQWHUVHFWLRQRQO\KDVWKUHHDSSURDFKHV0F/HOODQ%RXOHYDUGDSSURDFKHV
*UDQGH7UDLOZKLFKLVDWKURXJKVWUHHW7KLVPDNHV0F/HOODQ%RXOHYDUGDJRRGFDQGLGDWHIRUDVWRSVLJQLQVWDOODWLRQ
Location: *UDQGH7UDLODQG0F/HOODQ%RXOHYDUG 1RUWK
Criteria Met Criteria**
Yes
Additional
Study
Required No
A.
B.
C. An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area.
A.
B.
C.
A.
B. Criteria are not clearly met at this time - no further action recommended
C. Criteria may or may not be met - additional engineering study required
By: Date:
Title
By: Date:
Title
* Based upon Professional Engineer's Review
** Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)G:\Public\Hampshire\2023\HA2307-V Gast & Highbrook Stop Sign Study\Eng\[Two Way Yield or Stop Evaluation Form.xls]Sheet1
The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more than
2,000 units per day;
C. Approach speeds;
D. Sight distance available on each approach; and
E. Reported crash experience.
II. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local
roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions
exist:
I. YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist:
81,7('&,7<2)<25.9,//(
TWO WAY STOP
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Evaluation Criteria
Guidance: Engineering judgement should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors should be considered:
A. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches;
B. Number and angle of approaches;
Based on a preliminary review of the criteria for a YIELD or STOP sign the following action is recommended:
The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with
the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and/or
Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way at the intersection under
the normal right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been
reported within a 2-year period.
An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule would not be
expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law.
A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or
X
X
X
72'':(//6
6(1,25352-(&7(1*,1((5,,
%5$'6$1'(5621
&+,()23(5$7,1*2)),&(535(6,'(17
[
[
[
[
Criteria are clearly met recommending installation of a YIELD or STOP sign (Circle designated sign type)
Designate Location:0F/HOODQ%OYG
Constituti
o
n
W
a
y
McLellan BlvdGrande Tr
l
Grande Trl
Copyright nearmap 2015
WalshEngineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
GRANDE TRAIL & MCLELLAN BLVD
NORTH
STOP SIGN ANALYSIS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350 ³
200 0 200100 Feet
YO1107_Grande Trail & McLellan Blvd North Stop Analysis Existing
UNCONTROLLED INTERSECTION
Constituti
o
n
W
a
y
McLellan BlvdGrande Tr
l
Grande Trl
Copyright nearmap 2015
WalshEngineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
GRANDE TRAIL & MCLELLAN BLVD
NORTH
STOP SIGN ANALYSIS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350 ³
200 0 200100 Feet
YO1107_Grande Trail & McLellan Blvd North Stop Analysis Proposed
PROPOSED STOP CONTROLLED
INTERSECTION
!"$
McLellan Blvd and Grande Trail
North Intersection Photos
Westbound approach, looking West
Westbound approach, looking South
McLellan Blvd and Grande Trail
North Intersection Photos
Eastbound approach, looking East
Eastbound approach, looking South
McLellan Blvd and Grande Trail
North Intersection Photos
Northbound approach, looking North
Northbound approach, looking West
McLellan Blvd and Grande Trail
North Intersection Photos
Northbound approach, looking East
As requested, we investigated the possible installation of multi-way stop signs at the intersection
of *UDQGH7UDLODQG0F/HOODQ%RXOHYDUG. Our findings were as follows:
x Currently the intersection isFRQWUROOHGE\\LHOGVLJQVRQ0F/HOODQ%RXOHYDUG
x The intersection at *UDQGH7UDLODQG0F/HOODQ%RXOHYDUGDSSHDUVWRKDYHRFFDVLRQDOVLJKW
FRQVWUDLQWVGXHWRSDUNHGFDUVRQWKHURDG.
x The governing entity on traffic control signage is the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). The manual states as follows in regards to multi-way stop sign installation:Guidance:
The decision to install multi-way stop control should be based on an engineering study.
The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign
installation:
$Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be
installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the
traffic control signal.
%Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a
multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as
right-angle collisions.
&Minimum volumes:
The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of
both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average
day; and
The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection fromthe
minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units perhour
for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of atleast 30
seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but
If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the
minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and
2.
'Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80
percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
Option:
Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include:
A. The need to control left-turn conflicts;
Memorandum
To:Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Date: 5/18/2023
Subject:*UDQGH7UDLODQG0F/HOODQ%RXOHYDUG 6RXWK,QWHUVHFWLRQ
B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian
volumes;
C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to
negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design
and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational
characteristics of the intersection.
x The manual also states as follows in regards to stop sign installation:
Yield or Stop signs should not be used for speed control.
The traffic volume on the major street approach would appear to be below the average of 300 vehicles
per hour and the traffic volume on the minor street approach would appear to be below the average of 200
units per hour for any 8 hours of an average day.3DUNHGYHKLFOHVRQERWK*UDQGH7UDLODQG0F/HOODQ
%RXOHYDUGFUHDWHVLJKWFRQVWUDLQWV7KLVLVDQDUHDZLWKKLJKSHGHVWULDQYROXPHVGXHWRWKHYLFLQLW\RIWKH
SDUNDQGSXEOLFSRRO'XHWRWKHKLJKQXPEHURISHGHVWULDQVDQGVLJKWFRQVWUDLQWVWKLVintersection LV a
good candidate for amulti-way stop based on the above criteria.6WRSVLJQVVKRXOGEHLPSOHPHQWHGDWDOO
DSSURDFKHVWRWKLVLQWHUVHFWLRQ
Location:
Criteria Met Criteria**
Yes
Additional
Study
Required No
A.
B.
C. Minimum Volumes:
1.
2.
3.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Criteria are clearly met recommending installation of a multi-way stop
Criteria are not clearly met at this time - no further action recommended
Criteria may or may not be met - additional engineering study required
By:7RGG:HOOV Date:
6(1,25PROJECT ENGINEER,,
Title
By: Date:
Title
* Based upon Professional Engineer's Review 10/10/2013
** Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control
traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.
Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such
crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
The vehicular volume entering the intersections from the major street approaches (total of both approaches)averages
at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and
The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersections from the minor street approaches
(total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-
street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but
81,7('&,7<2)<25.9,//(
MULTI-WAY STOP
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Primary Criteria to Consider*
If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume
warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.
Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1 and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum
values, criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
Based on a preliminary review of the criteria for a multi-way stop sign the following action is recommended:
The need to control left-turn conflicts;
The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;
Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless
conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics
where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Xdž
X
*UDQGH7UDLODQG McLellan Boulevard 6RXWK
%UDG6DQGHUVRQ
&+,()23(5$7,1*2)),&(535(6,'(17
dž
[
dž
Grande Tr
l
Grand
e
T
r
l
Burr StSquire CirMcLellan BlvdMcLellan BlvdCopyright nearmap 2015
WalshEngineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
GRANDE TRAIL & MCLELLAN BLVD
SOUTH
STOP SIGN ANALYSIS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350 ³
200 0 200100 Feet
YO1107_Grande Trail & McLellan Blvd South Stop Analysis Existing
EXISTING YIELD
CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
%&'(
%&'(
Grande Tr
l
Grand
e
T
r
l
Burr StSquire CirMcLellan BlvdMcLellan BlvdCopyright nearmap 2015
WalshEngineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
GRANDE TRAIL & MCLELLAN BLVD
SOUTH
STOP SIGN ANALYSIS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350 ³
200 0 200100 Feet
YO1107_Grande Trail & McLellan Blvd South Stop Analysis Proposed
PROPOSED STOP
CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
!"$
!"$
!"$
!"$
McLellan Blvd. and Grande Trail
Intersection Photos
Eastbound approach, looking East
Eastbound approach, looking North
McLellan Blvd. and Grande Trail
Intersection Photos
Eastbound approach, looking South
Southbound approach, looking South
McLellan Blvd. and Grande Trail
Intersection Photos
Southbound approach, looking East
Southbound approach, looking West
McLellan Blvd. and Grande Trail
Intersection Photos
Westbound approach, looking West
Westbound approach, looking South
McLellan Blvd. and Grande Trail
Intersection Photos
Westbound approach, looking North
Northbound approach, looking North
McLellan Blvd. and Grande Trail
Intersection Photos
Northbound approach, looking West
Northbound approach, looking East
As requested, we investigated the possible installation of two way yield or stop signs at
the intersection of %HUU\ZRRG/DQHDQG6HHOH\6WUHHW. Our findings were as follows:
•Currently the intersection is FRQWUROOHGE\DVWRSVLJQRQWKHVRXWKERXQGDSSURDFKRI6HHOH\ 6WUHHW.
•The intersection at %HUU\ZRRG/DQHDQG6HHOH\ 6WUHHW does not appear to have any sight distance
constraints and appears to be “open”.
•The governing entity on traffic control signage is the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). The manual states as follows in regards to yield or stop sign installation:Guidance:
Engineering MXGJPHQW should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors should
be considered:
$Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches;
%Number and angle of approaches;
&Approach speeds;
'Sight distance available on each approach; and
(Reported crash experience.
<,(/' RU 6723 VLJQV VKRXOG EH XVHG DW DQ LQWHUVHFWLRQ LI RQH RU PRUH RI WKH IROORZLQJ
FRQGLWLRQV H[LVW
$$QLQWHUVHFWLRQRIDOHVVLPSRUWDQWURDGZLWKDPDLQURDGZKHUHDSSOLFDWLRQRIWKHQRUPDO
ULJKWRIZD\UXOHZRXOGQRWEHH[SHFWHGWRSURYLGHUHDVRQDEOHFRPSOLDQFHZLWKWKHODZ
%A street entering a designed through highway or street; and/or
&$QXQVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQ LQDVLJQDOL]HGDUHD
,QDGGLWLRQWKHXVHRI<,(/'RU6723VLJQVVKRXOGEHFRQVLGHUHGDWWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQRIWKH
WZRPLQRUVWUHHWVRUORFDOURDGVZKHUHWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQKDVPRUHWKDQWKUHHDSSURDFKHVDQG
ZKHUHRQHRUPRUHRIWKHIROORZLQJFRQGLWLRQVH[LVW
$7KH combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all
approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day;
%7KHDELOLW\WRVHHFRQIOLFWLQJWUDIILFRQDQDSSURDFKLVQRWVXIILFLHQWWRDOORZDURDGXVHUWRVWRS
RU\LHOGLQFRPSOLDQFHZLWKWKHQRUPDOULJKWRIZD\UXOHLIVXFKVWRSSLQJRU\LHOGLQJLV
QHFHVVDU\ DQGRU
&&UDVKUHFRUGVLQGLFDWHWKDWILYHRUPRUHFUDVKHVWKDWLQYROYHWKHIDLOXUHWR\LHOGWRWKHULJKWRI
ZD\DWWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQXQGHUWKHQRUPDOULJKWRIZD\UXOHKDYHEHHQUHSRUWHGZLWKLQD\HDU
SHULRGRUWKDWWKUHHRUPRUHVXFKFUDVKHVKDYHEHHQUHSRUWHGZLWKLQD\HDUSHULRG
7KHPDQXDODOVRVWDWHVDVIROORZVLQUHJDUGVWR VWRS RU\LHOGVLJQLQVWDOODWLRQ
<LHOG RU6WRSVLJQVVKRXOGQRWEHXVHGIRUVSHHGFRQWURO
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Adddministttttratorrr
From: Brad Sanddder
y
rson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Directorr of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble,Community Dev. Dir.
Jori Behlanddd, City Clerkkkk
Date: 5//2023
Subjectt:%HUU\ZRRG/DQHDQG6HHOH\6WUHHW
7KHDSSOLFDWLRQRIQRUPDOULJKWRIZD\UXOHLVH[SHFWHGWRSURYLGHUHDVRQDEOHFRPSOLDQFHIRUWKLVLQWHUVHFWLRQ7KLV
LQWHUVHFWLRQLVQRWLQDVLJQDOL]HGDUHD7KLVLQWHUVHFWLRQDYHUDJHVRYHUXQLWVDGD\RIDOOFRPELQHGWUDIILFDQG
SHGHVWULDQV6HHOH\6WUHHWDSSURDFKHV%HUU\ZRRG/DQHZKLFKLVDWKURXJKVWUHHW7KLVPDNHV6HHOH\6WUHHWDJRRG
FDQGLGDWHIRUDVWRSVLJQLQVWDOODWLRQIRUWKH1RUWKERXQGDSSURDFK
Location: Berrywood Lane and Seeley Street
Criteria Met Criteria**
Yes
Additional
Study
Required No
A.
B.
C. An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area.
A.
B.
C.
A.Criteria are clearly met recommending installation of a YIELD or STOP sign (Circle designated sign type)
Designate Location:
B. Criteria are not clearly met at this time - no further action recommended
C. Criteria may or may not be met - additional engineering study required
By: Date:
Title
By: Date:
Title
* Based upon Professional Engineer's Review
** Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)G:\Public\Hampshire\2023\HA2307-V Gast & Highbrook Stop Sign Study\Eng\[Two Way Yield or Stop Evaluation Form.xls]Sheet1
The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more than
2,000 units per day;
C. Approach speeds;
D. Sight distance available on each approach; and
E. Reported crash experience.
II. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local
roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions
exist:
I. YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist:
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
TWO WAY STOP
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Evaluation Criteria
Guidance: Engineering judgement should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors should be considered:
A. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches;
B. Number and angle of approaches;
Based on a preliminary review of the criteria for a YIELD or STOP sign the following action is recommended:
The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with
the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and/or
Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way at the intersection under
the normal right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been
reported within a 2-year period.
An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule would not be
expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law.
A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or
X
X
X
72'':(//6
6(1,25352-(&7(1*,1((5,,
%5$'6$1'(5621
&+,()23(5$7,1*2)),&(535(6,'(17
[
[
[
[
Seeley Street
()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-PINERIDGEBERRYWOOD
HOLLY
SEELEYCopyright nearmap 2015
WalshEngineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
6HHOH\6WDQG%HUU\ZRRG/Q
STOP SIGN ANALYSIS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350 ³
200 0 200100 Feet
YO1107_Berrywood Ln & Seeley St Stop Analysis - Existing
EXISTING STOP SIGN
CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
!"$
()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-PINERIDGEBERRYWOOD
HOLLY
SEELEYCopyright nearmap 2015
WalshEngineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
6HHOH\6WDQG%HUU\ZRRG/Q
STOP SIGN ANALYSIS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350 ³
200 0 200100 Feet
YO1107_Berrywood Ln & Seeley St Stop Analysis - Proposed
PROPOSED STOP SIGN
CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
!"$
!"$
Seeley St and Berrywood Ln
Intersection Photos
Northbound approach, looking North
Northbound approach, looking West
Seeley St and Berrywood Ln
Intersection Photos
Northbound approach, looking East
Eastbound approach, looking East
Seeley St and Berrywood Ln
Intersection Photos
Eastbound approach, looking North
Eastbound approach, looking South
Seeley St and Berrywood Ln
Intersection Photos
Southbound approach, looking South
Southbound approach, looking East
Seeley St and Berrywood Ln
Intersection Photos
Southbound approach, looking West
Westbound approach, looking West
Seeley St and Berrywood Ln
Intersection Photos
Westbound approach, looking South
Westbound approach, looking North
As requested, we investigated the possible installation of two way yield or stop signs at the
intersection of*UDQGH7UDLODQG6XQVHW$YHQXH. Our findings were as follows:
•Currently the intersection is controlled by D \LHOG VLJQ RQ 6XQVHW$YHQXH.
•The intersection at Grande Trail and 6XQVHW$YHQXH does not appear to have any sight distance
constraints and appears to be “open”.
•The governing entity on traffic control signage is the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). The manual states as follows in regards to yield or stop sign installation:Guidance:
Engineering MXGJPHQW should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors
should be considered:
$Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches;
%Number and angle of approaches;
&Approach speeds;
'Sight distance available on each approach; and
( 5HSRUWHGFUDVKH[SHULHQFH
<,(/'RU6723VLJQVVKRXOGEHXVHGDWDQLQWHUVHFWLRQLIRQHRUPRUHRIWKHIROORZLQJ
FRQGLWLRQVH[LVW
$$QLQWHUVHFWLRQRIDOHVVLPSRUWDQWURDGZLWKDPDLQURDGZKHUHDSSOLFDWLRQRIWKHQRUPDO
ULJKWRIZD\UXOHZRXOG QRWEHH[SHFWHGWRSURYLGHUHDVRQDEOHFRPSOLDQFHZLWKWKHODZ
%A street entering a designed through highway or street; and/or
& $QXQVLJQDOL]HGLQWHUVHFWLRQLQDVLJQDOL]HGDUHD
In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two
minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where
one or more of the following conditions exist:
$The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all
approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day;
%The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user
to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is
necessary; and/or
& &UDVKUHFRUGVLQGLFDWHWKDWILYHRUPRUHFUDVKHVWKDWLQYROYHWKHIDLOXUHWR\LHOGWKHULJKW
RIZD\DWWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQXQGHUWKHQRUPDOULJKWRIZD\UXOHKDYHEHHQUHSRUWHGZLWKLQD
\HDUSHULRGRUWKDWWKUHHRUPRUHVXFKFUDVKHVKDYHEHHQUHSRUWHGZLWKLQD\HDUSHULRG
7KHPDQXDODOVRVWDWHVWKHIROORZLQJLQUHJDUGVWRVWRSRU\LHOGVLJQLQVWDOODWLRQ
<LHOGRU6WRSVLJQVVKRXOGQRWEHXVHGIRUVSHHGFRQWURO
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Adddministttttratorrr
From: Brad Sanddder
y
rson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Directorr of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble,Community Dev. Dir.
Jori Behlanddd, City Clerkkkk
Date: 5//2023
Subjectt:*UDQGH7UDLODQG6XQVHW$YHQXH
7KHDSSOLFDWLRQRIQRUPDOULJKWRIZD\UXOHLVH[SHFWHGWRSURYLGHUHDVRQDEOHFRPSOLDQFHIRUWKLVLQWHUVHFWLRQ7KLV
LQWHUVHFWLRQLVQRWLQDVLJQDOL]HGDUHD7KLVLQWHUVHFWLRQRQO\KDVWKUHHDSSURDFKHV6XQVHW$YHQXHDSSURDFKHV
*UDQGH7UDLOZKLFKLVDWKURXJKVWUHHW7KLVPDNHV6XQVHW$YHQXHDJRRGFDQGLGDWHIRUDVWRSVLJQLQVWDOODWLRQ
Location: 6XQVHW$YHQXHDQG*UDQGH7UDLO
Criteria Met Criteria**
Yes
Additional
Study
Required No
A.
B.
C. An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area.
A.
B.
C.
A.
B. Criteria are not clearly met at this time - no further action recommended
C. Criteria may or may not be met - additional engineering study required
By: Date:
Title
By: Date:
Title
* Based upon Professional Engineer's Review
** Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)G:\Public\Hampshire\2023\HA2307-V Gast & Highbrook Stop Sign Study\Eng\[Two Way Yield or Stop Evaluation Form.xls]Sheet1
The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more than
2,000 units per day;
C. Approach speeds;
D. Sight distance available on each approach; and
E. Reported crash experience.
II. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local
roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions
exist:
I. YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist:
81,7('&,7<2)<25.9,//(
TWO WAY STOP
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Evaluation Criteria
Guidance: Engineering judgement should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors should be considered:
A. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches;
B. Number and angle of approaches;
Based on a preliminary review of the criteria for a YIELD or STOP sign the following action is recommended:
The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with
the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and/or
Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way at the intersection under
the normal right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been
reported within a 2-year period.
An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule would not be
expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law.
A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or
X
X
X
X
[
[
[
Criteria are clearly met recommending installation of a YIELD or STOP sign (Circle designated sign type)
Designate Location:
72'':(//6
6(1,25352-(&7(1*,1((5,,
%5$'6$1'(5621
&+,()23(5$7,1*2)),&(535(6,'(17
6XQVHW$YHQXH
()-()-()-()-Ol
d
G
l
o
r
y
D
r
Alden Ave
Gra
n
d
e
T
r
l
B
r
i
s
t
o
l
R
i
d
g
e
R
d Squire CirSunset AveCopyright nearmap 2015
WalshEngineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
GRANDE TRAIL & SUNSET AVE
STOP SIGN ANALYSIS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350 ³
200 0 200100 Feet
YO1107_Grande Trail & Sunset Ave Stop Analysis - Existing
EXISTING YIELD
CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
%&'(
()-()-()-()-Ol
d
G
l
o
r
y
D
r
Alden Ave
Gra
n
d
e
T
r
l
B
r
i
s
t
o
l
R
i
d
g
e
R
d Squire CirSunset AveCopyright nearmap 2015
WalshEngineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
GRANDE TRAIL & SUNSET AVE
STOP SIGN ANALYSIS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
MAY 2023
YO1107
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
630-553-4350 ³
200 0 200100 Feet
YO1107_Grande Trail & Sunset Ave Stop Analysis - Proposed
PROPOSED STOP
CONTROLLED INTERSECTION
!"$
1
Grande Trail and Sunset Ave
Intersection Photos
Northbound approach, looking North
Northbound approach, looking West
2
Grande Trail and Sunset Ave
Intersection Photos
Eastbound approach, looking East
Eastbound approach, looking North
3
Grande Trail and Sunset Ave
Intersection Photos
Eastbound approach, looking South
Southbound approach, looking South
4
Grande Trail and Sunset Ave
Intersection Photos
Southbound approach, looking West
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #5
Tracking Number
PW 2023-61
Garden Street – No Parking Recommendation
Public Works Committee – July 18, 2023
Majority
Approval
Review of Recommendation
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
Background
With the opening of the early childhood center on Garden and Rt. 47, the parking on Garden
Street has created an issue with traffic.
Parking is occurring on both sides of the roadway and encroaching near Rt 47, which is creating
issues for through traffic. It is also creating issues with the Rt 47 turn lanes. This has been
observed by both the Police and Public Works Departments.
Recommendation
We are recommending eliminating parking on the north side of the street as indicated in the
attached exhibit to solve the problem.
The surrounding properties that we be affected will be informed well in advance of sign
installation.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Krysti Barksdale Noble, Community Development Director
Date: June 26, 2023
Subject: Garden Street – No Parking Recommendation
GardenBridge
Wood Sage Copyright nearmap 2015Engineering Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6700GARDEN STREET PARKINGwww.eeiweb.comDATE:PROJECT NO.:FILE:PATH:BY:JUNE 2023YO2300YO2300- Garden Street Parking.MXDH:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2023\YO2300MJTUnited City of Yorkville800 Game Farm RoadYorkville, IL 60560630-553-4350³0200FeetLOCATION MAPUNITED CITY OF YORKVILLEKENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOISNO STREET PARKING ON NORTH SIDE OF GARDEN ST
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #6
Tracking Number
PW 2023-62
Corneils Road Interceptor Improvements – Change Order No. 2
Public Works Committee – July 18, 2023
Majority
Approval
Consideration of Change Order No. 2 - Balancing
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
The purpose of this memo is to present Change Order No. 2 - Balancing for the above referenced project.
A Change Order, as defined by in the General Conditions of the Contract Documents, is a written order to
the Contractor authorizing an addition, deletion or revision in the work within the general scope of the
Contract Documents, or authorizing an adjustment in the Contract Price or Contract Time.
Background:
The United City of Yorkville and Fischer Excavating, Inc. entered into an agreement for a contract value
of $3,140,637.45 for the above referenced project.
Questions Presented:
Should the City approve Change Order No. 2 – Balancing, which would decrease the contract value by
$156,065.00.
Discussion:
The change order would decrease the contract value to $2,984,572.45 based upon final measurement of
quantities in the field.
We are recommending approval of the change order.
Action Required:
Consideration of approval of Change Order No. 2 - Balancing.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator
Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Date: June 21, 2023
Subject: Corneils Road Interceptor Improvements
CHANGE ORDER
Order No. 2 - Balancing
Date: July 25, 2023
Agreement Date: January 13, 2023
NAME OF PROJECT: Corneils Road Interceptor Improvements
OWNER: United City of Yorkville
CONTRACTOR: Fischer Excavating, Inc.
The following changes are hereby made to the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:
Change of CONTRACT PRICE:
Original CONTRACT PRICE: $3,140,637.45
Current CONTRACT PRICE adjusted by previous CHANGE ORDER(S): $3,140,637.45
The CONTRACT PRICE due to this CHANGE ORDER will be decreased) by: $156,065.00
The new CONTRACT PRICE including this CHANGE ORDER will be: $2,984,572.45
Change to CONTRACT TIME:
The CONTRACT TIME will be (increased) (decreased) by calendar days.
The date for completion for all work will be:
Justification
This change order reduces the contract value based upon final measurements in the field.
Approvals Required
Requested by: United City of Yorkville
Recommended by: Engineering Enterprises, I nc.
Accepted by: Fischer Excavating, Inc
Page 1 of 1
ENGINEER'S PAYMENT ESTIMATE NO. 3
PAYABLE TO: FISCHER EXCAVATING, INC.CORNEILS ROAD INTERCEPTOR SEWER PAY PERIOD
ADDRESS: 1567 HEINE ROAD UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FROM: 4/29/2023 TO: 6/19/2023
FREEPORT, IL 61032 KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
COMPLETED
QUANTITY COMPLETED TOTAL TOTAL
AWARDED AWARDED ADDED DEDUCTED THIS PAY VALUE THIS COMPLETED COMPLETED
ITEM NO.ITEMS QUANTITY UNITS UNIT PRICE VALUE QUANTITY QUANTITY PERIOD PAY PERIOD QUANTITY VALUE
1 TREE REMOVAL, ACRES 0.25 ACRE 35,000.00$ 8,750.00$ 0.25 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00
2 FOUNDATION MATERIAL 100 CU YD 95.00$ 9,500.00$ 126.00 0.0 $0.00 226.0 $21,470.00
3 NON SPECIAL, NON HAZARDOUS SOIL WASTE DISPOSAL - TYPE 1 50 CU YD 99.00$ 4,950.00$ 50.00 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00
4 NON SPECIAL, NON HAZARDOUS SOIL WASTE DISPOSAL - TYPE 2 50 CU YD 37.00$ 1,850.00$ 50.00 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00
5 SELECTED GRANULAR BACKFILL 325 CU YD 47.00$ 15,275.00$ 9.00 40.0 $1,880.00 316.0 $14,852.00
6 RESTORATION 1 LSUM 18,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 1.0 $18,000.00 1.0 $18,000.00
7 EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION 3 EACH 872.00$ 2,616.00$ 0.0 $0.00 3.0 $2,616.00
8 PERIMETER EROSION BARRIER 14725 FOOT 2.90$ 42,702.50$ 1300.00 0.0 $0.00 13425.0 $38,932.50
9 INLET AND PIPE PROTECTION 5 EACH 370.00$ 1,850.00$ 2.00 0.0 $0.00 3.0 $1,110.00
10 FULL DEPTH PAVEMENT PATCHING 245 SQ YD 140.00$ 34,300.00$ 138.00 107.0 $14,980.00 107.0 $14,980.00
11 HMA PAVEMENT PATCH, 4-INCH 150 SQ YD 118.00$ 17,700.00$ 150.00 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00
12 REMOVE AND RE-ERECT STEEL PLATE BEAM GUARDRAIL 15 FOOT 95.00$ 1,425.00$ 15.00 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00
13 TRAFFIC BARRIER TERMINAL, TYPE 2 1 EACH 4,465.00$ 4,465.00$ 1.00 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00
14 AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT 2200 SQ YD 14.00$ 30,800.00$ 2200.00 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00
15 SANITARY SEWER, PVC C900, DR-18, 12-INCH 828 FOOT 150.00$ 124,200.00$ 89.00 0.0 $0.00 917.0 $137,550.00
16 SANITARY SEWER, PVC C900, DR-18, 16-INCH 6589 FOOT 240.00$ 1,581,360.00$ 89.00 0.0 $0.00 6500.0 $1,560,000.00
17 SANITARY SEWER, PVC C900, DR-18, 30-INCH 1190 FOOT 687.00$ 817,530.00$ 0.0 $0.00 1190.0 $817,530.00
18 TYPE A SANITARY MANHOLE, 5' DIA., TYPE 1 FRAME AND CLOSED LID 25 EACH 7,735.00$ 193,375.00$ 4.00 0.0 $0.00 21.0 $162,435.00
19 ADDITIONAL DEPTH OF MANHOLE 176 FOOT 597.00$ 105,072.00$ 13.00 189.0 $112,833.00 189.0 $112,833.00
20 PRESSURE TESTING SANITARY SEWER 8607 FOOT 1.00$ 8,607.00$ 2.00 0.0 $0.00 8605.0 $8,605.00
21 DEFLECTION TESTING SANITARY SEWER 8607 FOOT 0.85$ 7,315.95$ 2021.0 $1,717.85 8607.0 $7,315.95
22 SANITARY MANHOLE VACUUM TESTING 25 EACH 112.00$ 2,800.00$ 1.00 0.0 $0.00 24.0 $2,688.00
23 TELEVISING SANITARY SEWER 8598 FOOT 2.00$ 17,196.00$ 8598.00 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00
24 CONNECTION TO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE 1 EACH 3,050.00$ 3,050.00$ 0.0 $0.00 1.0 $3,050.00
25 DRAIN TILE REPAIR 100 FOOT 171.00$ 17,100.00$ 13.00 0.0 $0.00 87.0 $14,877.00
26 PIPE CULVERT REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT, 12"30 FOOT 94.00$ 2,820.00$ 30.00 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00
27 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION 1 LSUM 9,403.00$ 9,403.00$ 1.0 $9,403.00 1.0 $9,403.00
28 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 5 EACH 1,325.00$ 6,625.00$ 0.0 $0.00 5.0 $6,625.00
29 ALLOWANCE - ITEMS ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER 50000 UNIT 1.00$ 50,000.00$ 50000.00 0.0 $0.00 0.0 $0.00
AWARDED VALUE = $3,140,637.45 THIS PERIOD = $158,813.85 TO DATE = $2,954,872.45
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRAS AND CREDITS VALUE
1 TYPE A SANITARY MANHOLE, 6' DIA., TYPE 1 FRAME AND CLOSED LID 29,700.00$
2 SUMMARY
3 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS EXTRAS AND CREDITS 29,700.00$
TOTAL COMPLETED CONSTRUCTION COSTS 2,984,572.45$
DEDUCT RETAINAGE (RESTORATION)(10,000.00)$
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR 2,974,572.45$
MISCELLANEOUS DEBITS VALUE TOTAL DEBITS (2,543,182.74)$
1 PAY ESTIMATE 1 906,735.15$ NET AMOUNT DUE - THIS PAYMENT 431,389.71$
2 PAY ESTIMATE 2 1,636,447.59$
3
4
5 David Todd 5/31/2023
PREPARED BY : _________________________________________ DATE: _____________________
APPROVED BY : _________________________________________ DATE: _____________________
G:\Public\Yorkville\2021\YO2153-P Corneils Road Interceptor Sewer\Construction\Pay Estimates\[Pay Estimates.xls]Pay Estimate 3
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC., CONSULTING ENGINEERS Page 1 of 1
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #7
Tracking Number
PW 2023-63
2023 Water Main Improvements – Contract A
Public Works Committee – July 18, 2023
Majority
Approval
Consideration of Change Order No. 1
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
The purpose of this memo is to present Change Order No. 1 for the above referenced project.
A Change Order, as defined by in the General Conditions of the Contract Documents, is a written order to
the Contractor authorizing an addition, deletion or revision in the work within the general scope of the
Contract Documents, or authorizing an adjustment in the Contract Price or Contract Time.
Background:
The United City of Yorkville and Performance Construction & Engineering, LLC. entered into an
agreement for a contract value of $1,799,287.00 for the above referenced project.
Questions Presented:
Should the City approve Change Order No. 1 which would increase the contract value by $27,906.00?
Discussion:
The change order would increase the contract value to $1,827,193.00.
During water main installation, two previously unknown 2” diameter galvanized steel water services were
discovered that provide domestic water service to the Hillside Rehab & Care Center. These pipes were
found to be in severely deteriorated condition. Within days of their discovery, the water services broke
and needed repair four times. It was determined that due to the extremely poor condition of the pipe
material, the risk of future breaks and potential water quality issues was very high. The services required
to be drilled through the building foundation and connected inside by Hillside’s contracted plumber. The
services were temporarily connected to the existing main. The services will be transferred to the new
main when it becomes operational.
We are recommending approval of the change order.
Action Required:
Consideration of approval of Change Order No. 1.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator
Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Date: July 11, 2023
Subject: 2023 Water Main Improvements – Contract A
L:\Agendas - Packets\Packets\2023 Packets\Public Works\07-18-23\2023 Water Main Contract A - Change Order 1\3. Change Order 1 - Hillside Water
Services.doc
CHANGE ORDER
Order No. 1
Date: July 25, 2023
Agreement Date: March 28, 2023
NAME OF PROJECT: 2023 Water Main Improvements – Contract A
OWNER: United City of Yorkville
CONTRACTOR: Performance Construction & Engineering, LLC
The following changes are hereby made to the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:
1) Addition of 2” Water Service, Complete
2 Each @ $13,953/Each $27,906.00
Change of CONTRACT PRICE:
Original CONTRACT PRICE: $ 1,799,287.00
Current CONTRACT PRICE adjusted by previous CHANGE ORDER(S) $ 1,799,287.00
The CONTRACT PRICE due to this CHANGE ORDER will be (increased)(decreased) by:
$ _ 27,906.00
The new CONTRACT PRICE including this CHANGE ORDER will be $ 1,827,193.00
Justification:
1) During water main installation, two previously unknown 2” diameter galvanized steel water services
were discovered that provide domestic water service to the Hillside Rehab & Care Center. These pipes
were found to be in severely deteriorated condition. Within days of their discovery, the water services
broke and needed repair four times. It was determined that due to the extremely poor condition of the
pipe material, the risk of future breaks and potential water quality issues was very high. The services
required to be drilled through the building foundation and connected inside by Hillside’s contracted
plumber. The services were temporarily connected to the existing main. The services will be transferred
to the new main when it becomes operational.
Change to CONTRACT TIME:
The contract time is increased/decreased by 0 days.
Requested by: ___Performance Construction & Engineering, LLC_
Recommended by: Engineering Enterprises, Inc.
Accepted by: United City of Yorkville_
& 9<+979:
, ##
"&$%
09.%##'$
979:%#
!# ' %$1 %#%
%* # '
+
#%#"&$% %%*+(#$& %% % ( #& %!#$% &# $
$% % ( ,
9. %##'+ 9358:+>;:/ ?59=+>7<
$!# &$% $%% #% *# % %$ % % &#$
% ! ## * %%$#'% %)$% (%# - % ( $
$% + ( %# $#%$#'$ '#% % ( -$!# $ % & *
#$% #% #%# -%$$$& % $% $( ! #%% %#%& %
!#$-
$ % (* &' *"&$% $ # *% # % -
# *+
Lonnie Avery
'#*+ --+ #$ %
# # $%#&% 2 # +
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #8
Tracking Number
PW 2023-64
2023 Water Main Improvements – Contract B
Public Works Committee – July 18, 2023
Majority
Approval
Consideration of Change Order No. 1
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
The purpose of this memo is to present Change Order No. 1 for the above referenced project.
A Change Order, as defined by in the General Conditions of the Contract Documents, is a written order to
the Contractor authorizing an addition, deletion or revision in the work within the general scope of the
Contract Documents, or authorizing an adjustment in the Contract Price or Contract Time.
Background:
The City awarded the work for the above referenced contract to Winniger Excavating, Inc. in the amount
of $1,983,518.44. The project is currently in contracting.
Questions Presented:
Should the City approve Change Order No. 1 which would decrease the contract value by $193,581.89?
Discussion:
The change order would decrease the contract value to $1,789,936.55.
The bid value of the contract exceeded the budgeted value for water main improvements. The portion of
water main improvements on Colton Street will be removed from the contract and completed as part of
the 2024 water main improvements. The anticipated value of the improvements eliminated is
$193,581.89.
We are recommending approval of the change order.
Action Required:
Consideration of approval of Change Order No. 1.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator
Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Date: July 11, 2023
Subject: 2023 Water Main Improvements – Contract B
L:\Agendas - Packets\Packets\2023 Packets\Public Works\07-18-23\2023 Water Main Contract B - Change Order 1\3. Change
Order 1 - Colton Removal.doc
CHANGE ORDER
Order No. 1
Date: July 25, 2023
Agreement Date: N/A
NAME OF PROJECT: 2023 Water Main Replacement – Contract B
OWNER: United City of Yorkville
CONTRACTOR: Winniger Excavating, Inc.
The following changes are hereby made to the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:
1) Deduction of Colton Street Water Main Improvements
($193,581.89)
Change of CONTRACT PRICE:
Original CONTRACT PRICE: $ 1,983,518.44
Current CONTRACT PRICE adjusted by previous CHANGE ORDER(S) $ 1,983,518.44
The CONTRACT PRICE due to this CHANGE ORDER will be (increased)(decreased) by:
$ _193,581.89
The new CONTRACT PRICE including this CHANGE ORDER will be $ 1,789,936.55
Justification:
1) The bid value of the contract exceeded the budgeted value for water main
improvements. The portion of water main improvements on Colton Street will be
removed from the contract and completed as part of the 2024 water main improvements.
The anticipated value of the improvements eliminated is $193,581.89.
Change to CONTRACT TIME:
The contract time is increased/decreased by 0 days.
Requested by: _ __Winniger Excavating, Inc.
Recommended by: Engineering Enterprises, Inc.
Accepted by: United City of Yorkville_
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #9
Tracking Number
PW 2023-65
Beaver Street Pump Station Improvements – Change Order No. 1
Public Works Committee – July 18, 2023
Majority
Approval
Consideration of Change Order No. 1 - Balancing
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
The purpose of this memo is to present Change Order No. 1 - Balancing for the above-referenced project.
A Change Order, as defined by in the General Conditions of the Contract Documents, is a written order to
the Contractor authorizing an addition, deletion, or revision in the work within the general scope of the
Contract Documents, or authorizing an adjustment in the Contract Price or Contract Time.
Background:
The United City of Yorkville and Frank Marshall Electric entered into an agreement for a contract value
of $272,244.00 for the above-referenced project; with 180 consecutive calendar days to complete the
project.
Questions Presented:
Should the City approve Change Order No. 1 – Balancing, which would increase the contract value by
$8,358.00 and increase the contract time by 420 consecutive calendar days?
Discussion:
PVC Coated Chain Linked Fence
At the City’s request, the Contractor erected a new chain-link fence around the pump station site to
protect the new generator and aboveground electrical enclosure from intruders. The chain-linked fence
will provide sufficient site security for the pump station; the City decided to eliminate the door contacts
from the project.
Time Extension:
A shortage of materials delayed the delivery of the VFDs, and the Contractor required additional time to
construct the chain link fence.
The change order would increase the contract value to $280,602.00 and the contract time to 600 calendar
days.
The works is 100% complete on the project.
We are recommending approval of the change order.
Action Required:
Consideration of approval of Change Order No. 1 - Balancing.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Erin Willrett, Assistant City Administrator
Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Date: July 12, 2023
Subject: Beaver Street Pump Station Improvements
%DODQFLQJ
Change Order Request #1
Frank Marshall Electric
Electrical Contractors
1043 Oliver Avenue
Aurora, Illinois 60506
Phone: (630) 892-2942
Submitted to: Job Name and Location:
Engineering Enterprises Pump Station Improvements
52 Wheeler Road Beaver Street Pump Station
Sugar Grove, IL 60554 103 1/2 Beaver Street
Attn: Mr. Keith Powell Yorkville, IL 60560
Architect(s): Date Of Change Plans
Engineering Enterprises
52 Wheeler Road 06/14/21 Verbal
Sugar Grove, IL 60554 Keith Powell
This change order request is to provide a new chain link fence around the site. This fence will have
a 16' wide gate on the west end. Also included is the deduction of the door contacts. The new fence
will be black vinyl coated per the owners request.
Labor Material Subcontractor
Layout & Coordination $135.00 $0.00 $0.00
Kendall County Fence + 5%$0.00 $0.00 $18,060.00
Deduction of Door Contacts $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
9 - Door Contacts -$306.00 -$76.00 $0.00
200' - #14 XHHW -$135.00 -$36.00 $0.00
4 - Terminations @ SCADA -$34.00 $0.00 $0.00
Surveying Cost (NO MARK UP)$0.00 $0.00 $750.00
-$10,000.00
Total cost of change order…...................................................... $8,358.00
Sincerely,
Signature__________________________
Adam Marshall
Date: 07/19/22
Title: Project Manager
Allowance
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 BEAVER STREET PUMP STATION IMPROVEMENTSUNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE11 ELIMINATED DOORS CONTACTS FROM GENERATOR AND ELECTRICAL ENCLOSURE LS 1 587.00$ (587.00)$ 21 ENGINEERING ALLOWANCELS 1 10,000.00$ (10,000.00)$ CO FURNISH AND INSTALL PVC‐COATED CHAIN LINKED FENCE LS 1 18,945.00$ 18,945.00$ ‐$ 18,945.00$ (10,587.00)$ ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE: 272,244.00$ CURRENT CONTRACT PRICE ADJUSTED BY PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDER(S): 272,244.00$ AMOUNT OF CURRENT CHANGE ORDER: 8,358.00$ NEW CONTRACT PRICE: 280,602.00$ ADDITION COST DEDUCTION COSTTOTAL ADDITIONS =TOTAL DEDUCTIONS =ITEM NO. ITEMS UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #10
Tracking Number
PW 2023-66
South Central Elevated Water Storage Tank – Design Engineering Agreement
Public Works Committee – July 18, 2023
Majority
Approval
Please see the attached memo.
Bart Olson Administration
Name Department
Summary
Consideration of a design engineering agreement with EEI for the South Central Elevated
Water Storage Tank Rehabilitation project.
Background
This item was last discussed during the FY 24 budget presentation, when the City
Council reviewed a budget proposal that contains $45,000 in design engineering costs in FY 24
and $945,000 in FY 25 for construction engineering and project costs for repainting the south
central water tower. Accordingly, EEI has submitted a design engineering contract for the
project.
The agreement submitted by EEI covers design engineering services only. The total cost
of the contract is a fixed fee amount of $34,926. This cost is included in the FY 24 budget. This
work is expected to begin in 2024 after the design work is complete in late 2023 and the project
is bid out in Winter 2023/2024.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the design engineering agreement with EEI for the South
Central Elevated Water Storage Tank Rehabilitation project.
Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Bart Olson, City Administrator
CC:
Date: July 13, 2023
Subject: South Central Elevated Water Storage Tank – Design
Engineering
South Central Elevated Water Storage Tank Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville, IL
Professional Services Agreement - Design Engineering
THIS AGREEMENT, by and between the United City of Yorkville, hereinafter referred
to as the "City" or “OWNER” and Engineering Enterprises, Inc. hereinafter referred to as
the "Contractor" or “ENGINEER” agrees as follows:
A. Services:
ENGINEER agrees to furnish to the City the following services: The ENGINEER shall
provide any and all necessary engineering services to the City as indicated on the Scope
of Services (Attachment B). Design engineering will be provided for the rehabilitation of
the South Central Elevated Water Storage Tank, which shall include repainting the
interior and exterior of the tank. Engineering will be in accordance with all City,
Standard Specifications for Water and Sewer Construction in Illinois, Illinois Department
of Transportation, and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency requirements.
B. Term:
Services will be provided beginning on the date of execution of this agreement and
continuing, until terminated by either party upon 7 days written notice to the non-
terminating party or upon completion of the Services. Upon termination the ENGINEER
shall be compensated for all work performed for the City prior to termination.
C. Compensation and maximum amounts due to ENGINEER:
ENGINEER shall receive as compensation for all work and services to be performed
herein, an amount based on the Estimate of Level of Effort and Associated Cost included
in Attachment C. Design Engineering will be paid for as a Fixed Fee (FF) in the amount
of $34,926. The hourly rates for this project are shown in the attached 2023 Standard
Schedule of Charges (Attachment F). All payments will be made according to the Illinois
State Prompt Payment Act and not less than once every thirty days.
D. Changes in Rates of Compensation:
In the event that this contract is designated in Section B hereof as an Ongoing Contract,
ENGINEER, on or before February 1st of any given year, shall provide written notice of
any change in the rates specified in Section C hereof (or on any attachments hereto) and
said changes shall only be effective on and after May 1st of that same year.
South Central Water Storage Tank Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville
Professional Services Agreement
Design Engineering
E. Ownership of Records and Documents:
ENGINEER agrees that all books and records and other recorded information developed
specifically in connection with this agreement shall remain the property of the City.
ENGINEER agrees to keep such information confidential and not to disclose or
disseminate the information to third parties without the consent of the City. This
confidentiality shall not apply to material or information, which would otherwise be
subject to public disclosure through the freedom of information act or if already
previously disclosed by a third party. Upon termination of this agreement, ENGINEER
agrees to return all such materials to the City. The City agrees not to modify any original
documents produced by ENGINEER without contractors consent. Modifications of any
signed duplicate original document not authorized by ENGINEER will be at OWNER’s
sole risk and without legal liability to the ENGINEER. Use of any incomplete, unsigned
document will, likewise, be at the OWNER’s sole risk and without legal liability to the
ENGINEER.
F. Governing Law:
This contract shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Illinois. Venue shall be in Kendall County, Illinois.
G. Independent Contractor:
ENGINEER shall have sole control over the manner and means of providing the work
and services performed under this agreement. The City’s relationship to the ENGINEER
under this agreement shall be that of an independent contractor. ENGINEER will not be
considered an employee to the City for any purpose.
H. Certifications:
Employment Status: The Contractor certifies that if any of its personnel are an employee
of the State of Illinois, they have permission from their employer to perform the service.
Anti-Bribery: The Contractor certifies it is not barred under 30 Illinois Compiled Statutes
500/50-5(a) - (d) from contracting as a result of a conviction for or admission of bribery
or attempted bribery of an officer or employee of the State of Illinois or any other state.
Loan Default: If the Contractor is an individual, the Contractor certifies that he/she is not
in default for a period of six months or more in an amount of $600 or more on the
repayment of any educational loan guaranteed by the Illinois State Scholarship
Commission made by an Illinois institution of higher education or any other loan made
from public funds for the purpose of financing higher education (5 ILCS 385/3).
South Central Water Storage Tank Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville
Professional Services Agreement
Design Engineering
Felony Certification: The Contractor certifies that it is not barred pursuant to 30 Illinois
Compiled Statutes 500/50-10 from conducting business with the State of Illinois or any
agency as a result of being convicted of a felony.
Barred from Contracting: The Contractor certifies that it has not been barred from
contracting as a result of a conviction for bid-rigging or bid rotating under 720 Illinois
Compiled Statutes 5/33E or similar law of another state.
Drug Free Workplace: The Contractor certifies that it is in compliance with the Drug
Free Workplace Act (30 Illinois Compiled Statutes 580) as of the effective date of this
contract. The Drug Free Workplace Act requires, in part, that Contractors, with 25 or
more employees certify and agree to take steps to ensure a drug free workplace by
informing employees of the dangers of drug abuse, of the availability of any treatment or
assistance program, of prohibited activities and of sanctions that will be imposed for
violations; and that individuals with contracts certify that they will not engage in the
manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance in
the performance of the contract.
Non-Discrimination, Certification, and Equal Employment Opportunity: The Contractor
agrees to comply with applicable provisions of the Illinois Human Rights Act (775
Illinois Compiled Statutes 5), the U.S. Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities
Act, Section 504 of the U.S. Rehabilitation Act and the rules applicable to each. The
equal opportunity clause of Section 750.10 of the Illinois Department of Human Rights
Rules is specifically incorporated herein. The Contractor shall comply with Executive
Order 11246, entitled Equal Employment Opportunity, as amended by Executive Order
11375, and as supplemented by U.S. Department of Labor regulations (41 C.F.R. Chapter
60). The Contractor agrees to incorporate this clause into all subcontracts under this
Contract.
International Boycott: The Contractor certifies that neither it nor any substantially owned
affiliated company is participating or shall participate in an international boycott in
violation of the provisions of the U.S. Export Administration Act of 1979 or the
regulations of the U.S. Department of Commerce promulgated under that Act (30 ILCS
582).
Record Retention and Audits: If 30 Illinois Compiled Statutes 500/20-65 requires the
Contractor (and any subcontractors) to maintain, for a period of 3 years after the later of
the date of completion of this Contract or the date of final payment under the Contract, all
books and records relating to the performance of the Contract and necessary to support
amounts charged to the City under the Contract. The Contract and all books and records
related to the Contract shall be available for review and audit by the City and the Illinois
Auditor General. If this Contract is funded from contract/grant funds provided by the
U.S. Government, the Contract, books, and records shall be available for review and
audit by the Comptroller General of the U.S. and/or the Inspector General of the federal
South Central Water Storage Tank Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville
Professional Services Agreement
Design Engineering
sponsoring agency. The Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with any audit and to
provide full access to all relevant materials.
United States Resident Certification: (This certification must be included in all contracts
involving personal services by non-resident aliens and foreign entities in accordance with
requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Services for withholding and reporting
federal income taxes.) The Contractor certifies that he/she is a: x United States Citizen
___ Resident Alien ___ Non-Resident Alien The Internal Revenue Service requires that
taxes be withheld on payments made to non resident aliens for the performance of
personal services at the rate of 30%.
Tax Payer Certification : Under penalties of perjury, the Contractor certifies that its
Federal Tax Payer Identification Number or Social Security Number is (provided
separately) and is doing business as a (check one): ___ Individual ___ Real Estate
Agent ___ Sole Proprietorship ___ Government Entity ___ Partnership ___ Tax
Exempt Organization (IRC 501(a) only) x Corporation ___ Not for Profit Corporation
___ Trust or Estate ___ Medical and Health Care Services Provider Corp.
I. Indemnification:
ENGINEER shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and City’s agents, servants, and
employees against all loss, damage, and expense which it may sustain or for which it will
become liable on account of injury to or death of persons, or on account of damage to or
destruction of property resulting from the performance of work under this agreement by
ENGINEER or its Subcontractors, or due to or arising in any manner from the wrongful
act or negligence of ENGINEER or its Subcontractors of any employee of any of them.
In the event that the either party shall bring any suit, cause of action or counterclaim
against the other party, the non-prevailing party shall pay to the prevailing party the cost
and expenses incurred to answer and/or defend such action, including reasonable attorney
fees and court costs. In no event shall the either party indemnify any other party for the
consequences of that party’s negligence, including failure to follow the ENGINEER’s
recommendations.
J. Insurance:
The ENGINEER agrees that it has either attached a copy of all required insurance
certificates or that said insurance is not required due to the nature and extent of the types
of services rendered hereunder. (Not applicable as having been previously supplied)
K. Additional Terms or Modification:
The terms of this agreement shall be further modified as provided on the attachments.
Except for those terms included on the attachments, no additional terms are included as a
part of this agreement. All prior understandings and agreements between the parties are
merged into this agreement, and this agreement may not be modified orally or in any
South Central Water Storage Tank Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville
Professional Services Agreement
Design Engineering
manner other than by an agreement in writing signed by both parties. In the event that
any provisions of this agreement shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the
remaining provisions shall be valid and binding on the parties. The list of exhibits is as
follows:
Attachment A: Standard Terms and Conditions
Attachment B: Scope of Services
Attachment C: Estimate of Level of Effort and Associated Cost
Attachment D: Anticipated Project Schedule
Attachment E: 2023 Standard Schedule of Charges
L. Notices:
All notices required to be given under the terms of this agreement shall be given mail,
addressed to the parties as follows:
For the City: For the ENGINEER:
City Administrator and City Clerk Engineering Enterprises, Inc.
United City of Yorkville 52 Wheeler Road
800 Game Farm Road Sugar Grove Illinois 60554
Yorkville, IL 60560
Either of the parties may designate in writing from time to time substitute addresses or
persons in connection with required notices.
Agreed to this _____day of __________________, 2023.
United City of Yorkville: Engineering Enterprises, Inc.:
_________________________________ ________________________________
Brad Sanderson, P.E.0D\RU-RKQ3XUFHOO
Chief Operating Officer / President
_________________________________ ________________________________
Jori Behland Michele L. Piotrowski, PE, LEED AP
City Clerk Vice President
______________________________________________________________________________________________
MiMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMchele LPiotrowski PE LEED AP
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Agreement: These Standard Terms and Conditions, together with the Professional Services
Agreement, constitute the entire integrated agreement between the OWNER and Engineering
Enterprises, Inc. (EEI) (hereinafter “Agreement”), and take precedence over any other provisions
between the Parties. These terms may be amended, but only if both parties consent in writing.
Standard of Care: In providing services under this Agreement, the ENGINEER will
endeavor to perform in a matter consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised
by members of the same profession currently practicing under same circumstances in the same
locality. ENGINEER makes no other warranties, express or implied, written or oral under this
Agreement or otherwise, in connection with ENGINEER’S service.
Construction Engineering and Inspection: The ENGINEER shall not supervise, direct,
control, or have authority over any contractor work, nor have authority over or be responsible for
the means, methods, techniques sequences, or procedures of construction selected or used by any
contractor, or the safety precautions and programs incident thereto, for security or safety of the
site, nor for any failure of a contractor to comply with laws and regulations applicable to such
contractor’s furnishing and performing of its work.
The ENGINEER neither guarantees the performance of any contractor nor assumes
responsibility for contractor’s failure to furnish and perform the work in accordance with the
contract documents.
The ENGINEER is not responsible for the acts or omissions of any contractor, subcontractor, or
supplies, or any of their agents or employees or any other person at the site or otherwise
furnishing or performing any work.
Shop drawing and submittal review by the ENGINEER shall apply to only the items in the
submissions and only for the purpose of assessing if upon installation or incorporation in the
project work they are generally consistent with the construction documents. OWNER agrees that
the contractor is solely responsible for the submissions and for compliance with the construction
documents. OWNER further agrees that the ENGINEER’S review and action in relation to these
submissions shall not constitute the provision of means, methods, techniques, sequencing or
procedures of construction or extend or safety programs or precautions. The ENGINEER’S
consideration of a component does not constitute acceptance of the assembled items.
The ENGINEER’S site observation during construction shall be at the times agreed upon in the
Project Scope. Through standard, reasonable means the ENGINEER will become generally
familiar with observable completed work. If the ENGINEER observes completed work that is
inconsistent with the construction documents, that information shall be communicated to the
contractor and OWNER for them to address.
Opinion of Probable Construction Costs: ENGINEER’S opinion of probable construction
costs represents ENGINEER’S best and reasonable judgment as a professional engineer.
OWNER acknowledges that ENGINEER has no control over construction costs of contractor’s
methods of determining pricing, or over competitive bidding by contractors, or of market
conditions or changes thereto. ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or
actual construction costs will not vary from ENGINEER’S opinion of probable construction
costs.
Copies of Documents & Electronic Compatibility: Copies of Documents that may be
relied upon by OWNER are limited to the printed copies (also known as hard copies) that are
signed or sealed by the ENGINEER. Files in electronic media format of text, data, graphics, or of
other types that are furnished by ENGINEER to OWNER are only for convenience of OWNER.
Any conclusion or information obtained or derived from such electronic files will be at the user's
sole risk. When transferring documents in electronic media format, ENGINEER makes no
representations as to long term compatibility, usability, or readability of documents resulting
from the use of software application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware
differing from those used by ENGINEER at the beginning of the project.
Changed Conditions: If, during the term of this Agreement, circumstances or conditions
that were not originally contemplated by or known to the ENGINEER are revealed, to the extent
that they affect the scope of services, compensation, schedule, allocation of risks, or other
material terms of this Agreement, the ENGINEER may call for renegotiation of appropriate
portions of this Agreement. The ENGINEER shall notify the OWNER of the changed conditions
necessitating renegotiation, and the ENGINEER and the OWNER shall promptly and in good
faith enter into renegotiation of this Agreement to address the changed conditions. If terms
cannot be agreed to, the parties agree that either party has the absolute right to terminate this
Agreement, in accordance with the termination provision hereof.
Hazardous Conditions: OWNER represents to ENGINEER that to the best of its
knowledge no Hazardous Conditions (environmental or otherwise) exist on the project site. If a
Hazardous Condition is encountered or alleged, ENGINEER shall have the obligation to notify
OWNER and, to the extent of applicable Laws and Regulations, appropriate governmental
officials. It is acknowledged by both parties that ENGINEER's scope of services does not include
any services related to a Hazardous Condition. In the event ENGINEER or any other party
encounters a Hazardous Condition, ENGINEER may, at its option and without liability for
consequential or any other damages, suspend performance of services on the portion of the
project affected thereby until OWNER: (i) retains appropriate specialist consultant(s) or
contractor(s) to identify and, as appropriate, abate, remediate, or remove the Hazardous
Condition; and (ii) warrants that the project site is in full compliance with applicable Laws and
Regulations.
Consequential Damages: Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, and to the
fullest extent permitted by law, neither the OWNER nor the ENGINEER, their respective
officers, directors, partners, employees, contractors, or subcontractors shall be liable to the other
or shall make any claim for any incidental, indirect, or consequential damages arising out of or
connected in any way to the Project or to this Agreement. This mutual waiver of consequential
damages shall include, but is not limited to, loss of use, loss of profit, loss of business, loss of
income, loss of reputation, or any other consequential damages that either party may have
incurred from any cause of action including negligence, strict liability, breach of contract, and
breach of strict or implied warranty. Both the OWNER and the ENGINEER shall require similar
waivers of consequential damages protecting all the entities or persons named herein in all
contracts and subcontracts with others involved in this project.
Termination: This Agreement may be terminated for convenience, without cause, upon
fourteen (14) days written notice of either party. In the event of termination, the ENGINEER
shall prepare a final invoice and be due compensation as set forth in the Professional Services
Agreement for all costs incurred through the date of termination.
Either party may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the other party not less than
seven (7) calendar days’ written notice for the following reasons:
(a) Substantial failure by the other party to comply with or perform in accordance
with the terms of the Agreement and through no fault of the terminating party;
(b) Assignment of the Agreement or transfer of the project without the prior written
consent of the other party;
(c) Suspension of the project or the ENGINEER’S services by the OWNER for a
period of greater than ninety (90) calendar days, consecutive or in the aggregate.
(d) Material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered into,
the scope of services or the nature of the project, and the failure of the parties to
reach agreement on the compensation and schedule adjustments necessitated by
such changes.
Third Party Beneficiaries: Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual
relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against either the OWNER or the
ENGINEER. The ENGINEER’S services under this Agreement are being performed solely and
exclusively for the OWNER’S benefit, and no other party or entity shall have any claim against
the ENGINEER because of this Agreement or the performance or nonperformance of services
hereunder. The OWNER and ENGINEER agree to require a similar provision in all contracts
with contractors, subcontractors, vendors and other entities involved in this Project to carry out
the intent of this provision.
Force Majeure: Each Party shall be excused from the performance of its obligations under
this Agreement to the extent that such performance is prevented by force majeure (defined
below) and the nonperforming party promptly provides notice of such prevention to the other
party. Such excuse shall be continued so long as the condition constituting force majeure
continues. The party affected by such force majeure also shall notify the other party of the
anticipated duration of such force majeure, any actions being taken to avoid or minimize its
effect after such occurrence, and shall take reasonable efforts to remove the condition
constituting such force majeure. For purposes of this Agreement, “force majeure” shall include
conditions beyond the control of the parties, including an act of God, acts of terrorism, voluntary
or involuntary compliance with any regulation, law or order of any government, war, acts of war
(whether war be declared or not), labor strike or lock-out, civil commotion, epidemic, failure or
default of public utilities or common carriers, destruction of production facilities or materials by
fire, earthquake, storm or like catastrophe. The payment of invoices due and owing hereunder
shall in no event be delayed by the payer because of a force majeure affecting the payer.
Additional Terms or Modification: All prior understandings and agreements between
the parties are merged into this Agreement, and this Agreement may not be modified orally or in
any manner other than by an Agreement in writing signed by both parties. In the event that any
provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining
provisions shall be valid and binding on the parties.
Assignment: Neither party to this Agreement shall transfer or assign any rights or duties under
or interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. Subcontracting
normally contemplated by the ENGINEER shall not be considered an assignment for purposes of
this Agreement.
Waiver: A party’s waiver of, or the failure or delay in enforcing any provision of this
Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the provision, nor shall it affect the enforceability of
that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement.
Attorney’s Fees: In the event of any action or proceeding brought by either party against the
other under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other all
costs and expenses including without limitation the reasonable fees of its attorneys in such action
or proceeding, including costs of appeal, if any, in such amount as the Court may adjudge
reasonable.
Headings: The headings used in this Agreement are inserted only as a matter of convenience
only, and in no way define, limit, enlarge, modify, explain or define the text thereof nor affect
the construction or interpretation of this Agreement.
South Central Elevated Water Storage Tank Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville, IL
Professional Services Agreement - Design Engineering
Attachment B – Scope of Services
Deficiencies have been observed with the exterior and interior coating systems of the South Central Elevated
Water Storage Tank (EWST). As part of the scope of this contract, a site visit will be performed to
additionally observe field conditions and potential structural, sanitary, and safety items that may need to be
addressed. In addition to the site visit, the scope of this work includes an electrical review, preparation of
bidding documents, and coordination of bidding and letting.
The proposed work items for this project are as follows:
DESIGN ENGINEERING
2.1 Project Management and Administration
x Budget Tracking
x Management of Personnel and the Engineering Contract
2.2 Project Meetings
x Project Kick-Off Meeting Between the City and EEI
x One (1) Design Progress Meeting Between the City and EEI prior to Bidding
2.3 Final Plans, Specifications and Estimates
x Preparation of 60%, 90%, and 100% Project Manual and Engineer’s Opinion of Probable
Construction Cost.
x Project Manual Shall Include Bidding and Contract Documents, General Conditions, Special
Provisions and Exhibits.
2.4 Bidding and Contracting
x Prepare Bidders List and Ad for Bid
x Submit Ad for Bid to the Local Paper and Post Bidding Documents on QuestCDN
x Address Bid Questions and Prepare Addenda
x Attend Bid Opening
x Prepare Bid Tab, Bid Summary, and Recommendation of Award
x Execute Contract Documents
Design includes an electrical review of the tank and associated specifications for any of the associated
electrical improvements required. Furthermore, if required, a pre-bid meeting is included with the work items
above. This scope does not include any coordination with telecommunication carriers if antennas or other
equipment are on the tank.
The above scope summarizes the work items that will be completed for this contract. Additional work items,
such as additional meetings beyond the project initiation meeting defined in the above scope, shall be
considered outside the scope of the base contract and will be billed in accordance with the Standard Schedule
of Charges.
ATTACHMENT C: ESTIMATE OF LEVEL OF EFFORT AND ASSOCIATED COST
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
CLIENT PROJECT NUMBER
United City of Yorkville YO2008-P
PROJECT TITLE DATE PREPARED BY
South Central Water Storage Tank Rehabilitation
ROLE PIC SPM PM SPE II PE CAD ADMIN
PERSON BPS MLP MWS KKP
RATE $239 $234 $212 $192 $162 $167 $70
DESIGN ENGINEERING
2.1 Project Management and Administration 1 8 - - - 9 2,111$
2.2 Project Meetings 2 6 8 - - 16 3,418$
2.3 Contract Documents (Incl. Exhibits) 5 14 72 14 2 107 20,773$
2.4 Bidding and Contracting - 2 23 - 7 32 5,374$
Insert Task Subtotal: 8 30 - 103 - 14 9 164 31,676$
8 30 - 103 - 14 9 164 31,676
EEI STAFF DIRECT EXPENSES
BPS Brad P. Sanderson Printing/Scanning = 100$
MLP Michele L. Piotrowski Paint Sampling = 150$
MWS Michael W. Schweisthal Electrical = 3,000$
KKP Kris K. Pung DIRECT EXPENSES = 3,250$
LABOR SUMMARY
EEI Labor Expenses = 31,676$
TOTAL LABOR EXPENSES 31,676$
TOTAL COSTS 34,926$
52 Wheeler Road, Sugar Grove, IL 60554 Tel: 630.466.6700 Fax: 630.466.6701 www.eeiweb.com
PROJECT TOTAL:
7/12/23 MLP
TASK
NO.TASK DESCRIPTION HOURS COST
ATTACHMENT D: ESTIMATED SCHEDULECLIENT PROJECT NUMBERUnited City of YorkvilleYO2008-PPROJECT TITLEDATE PREPARED BYSouth Central Water Storage Tank RehabilitationMLPAUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MARAPR MAYDESIGN ENGINEERING2.1 Project Management and Administration2.2 Project Meetings2.3 Contract Documents (Incl. Exhibits)2.4 Bidding and Contracting 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove, IL 60554 Tel: 630.466.6700 Fax: 630.466.6701 www.eeiweb.comTASK NO.TASK DESCRIPTION7/12/232024
EMPLOYEE DESIGNATION CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE
Senior Principal E-4 $239.00
Principal E-3 $234.00
Senior Project Manager E-2 $227.00
Project Manager E-1 $204.00
Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor II P-6 $192.00
Senior Project Engineer/Surveyor I P-5 $179.00
Project Engineer/Surveyor P-4 $162.00
Senior Engineer/Surveyor P-3 $149.00
Engineer/Surveyor P-2 $135.00
Associate Engineer/Surveyor P-1 $122.00
Senior Project Technician II T-6 $167.00
Senior Project Technician I T-5 $156.00
Project Technician T-4 $146.00
Senior Technician T-3 $135.00
Technician T-2 $122.00
Associate Technician T-1 $107.00
GIS Technician II G-2 $119.00
GIS Technician I G-1 $110.00
Engineering/Land Surveying Intern I-1 $ 79.00
Executive Administrative Assistant A-4 $ 75.00
Administrative Assistant A-3 $ 70.00
VEHICLES. REPROGRAPHICS, DIRECT COSTS, DRONE AND EXPERT TESTIMONY
Vehicle for Construction Observation $ 15.00
In-House Scanning and Reproduction $0.25/Sq. Ft. (Black & White)
$1.00/Sq. Ft. (Color)
Reimbursable Expenses (Direct Costs) Cost
Services by Others (Direct Costs) Cost + 10%
Unmanned Aircraft System / Unmanned Aerial Vehicle / Drone $ 216.00
Expert Testimony $ 271.00
$77$&+0(17'STANDARD SCHEDULE OF CHARGES ~ JANUARY 1, 2023