Public Works Packet 2023 11-21-23
AGENDA
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING
Tuesday, November 21, 2023
6:00 p.m.
East Conference Room #337
651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Yorkville, IL
Citizen Comments:
Minutes for Correction/Approval: October 17, 2023
New Business:
1. PW 2023-84 Route 47 Expansion and Improvements – Update and Overview
2. PW 2023-85 Kane-Kendall Council of Mayors (KKCOM) Call for Projects
3. PW 2023-86 Special Service Area – Fox Hill & Sunflower Estates – Maintenance Services
4. PW 2023-87 2023 Road to Better Roads – Change Order No. 1 and Final Payment Estimate
5. PW 2023-88 Meeting Schedule for 2024
Old Business:
1. PW 2023-83 Kylyns Ridge Subdivision Traffic Sign Analysis
Additional Business:
United City of Yorkville
651 Prairie Pointe Drive
Yorkville, Illinois 60560
Telephone: 630-553-4350
www.yorkville.il.us
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
WORKSHEET
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
Tuesday, November 21, 2023
6:00 PM
CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CITIZEN COMMENTS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. October 17, 2023
□ Approved __________
□ As presented
□ With corrections
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW BUSINESS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. PW 2023-84 Route 47 Expansion and Improvements – Update and Overview
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. PW 2023-85 Kane-Kendall Council of Mayors (KKCOM) Call for Projects
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. PW 2023-86 Special Service Area – Fox Hill & Sunflower Estates – Maintenance Services
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. PW 2023-87 2023 Road to Better Roads – Change Order No. 1 and Final Payment Estimate
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. PW 2023-88 Meeting Schedule for 2024
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OLD BUSINESS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. PW 2023-83 Kylyns Ridge Subdivision Traffic Sign Analysis
□ Moved forward to CC __________
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
Minutes
Tracking Number
Minutes of the Public Works Committee – October 17, 2023
Public Works Committee – November 21, 2023
Majority
Committee Approval
Minute Taker
Name Department
DRAFT
Page 1 of 2
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
Tuesday, October 17, 2023, 6:00pm
Yorkville City Hall, East Conference Room #337
651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Yorkville, IL
IN ATTENDANCE:
Committee Members
Chairman Ken Koch Alderman Matt Marek (via Zoom)
Alderman Rusty Corneils Alderman Craig Soling (arr. 6:07pm)
Other City Officials
City Administrator Bart Olson Assistant City Administrator Erin Willrett (via Zoom)
Engineer Brad Sanderson, EEI Public Works Director Eric Dhuse
Alderman Chris Funkhouser (arr. 6:11pm)
Other Guests: None
The meeting was called to order at 6:00pm by Chairman Ken Koch.
Citizen Comments: None
Previous Meeting Minutes: September 19, 2023
The minutes were approved as presented.
New Business:
1. PW 2023-79 Capital Improvement Projects Update
Mr. Sanderson said this is the quarterly update. The storage tank near the Public Works building is progressing
and it should be complete in mid-November. Contract B is the second watermain project south of the tank and is
about 70% complete. Some water service work east of Rt. 47 along with some concrete paving will be finishing
up in the next few weeks. Alderman Koch asked if these projects will be totally complete this year and he cited
some of the streets that will only receive the first coat this year. Mr. Dhuse said the projects described by Mr.
Sanderson will be totally complete this year and the projects south of Somonauk St. will be fully paved. No
further action needed.
2. PW 2023-80 Quarterly Bond and and Letter of Credit Reduction Summary
This is a quarterly update also. There is one reduction in Windett Ridge and there was one earlier in the year.
All homes are now built in this area, said Mr. Dhuse.
3. PW 2023-81 North Central Tank Rehabilitation – Change Order No. 2
Mr. Sanderson said there are 2 items for consideration. The original completion date was June 1st of this year
and the city asked the contractor to delay it due to the well #7 project. The contractor agreed and did not make a
change in the cost. The completion date was pushed to the end of November. The second consideration is that
T-Mobile occupies space on the tank. They are changing out some equipment and requested some modifications
to the tank. There were additional holes cut and miscellaneous work done. The city did not want to paint it and
then cut the holes. Mr. Sanderson said T-Mobile will reimburse the city for the work in the amount of $23,000.
Mr. Sanderson recommended approval of both items and this item will move forward to the City Council
consent agenda.
Page 2 of 2
4. PW 2023-82 2024 Road to Better Roads – Design Engineering Agreement
Mr. Olson said this is for the next year's road program for and is the base bid amount for about $1.5 million. He
said this amount may be increased pending the upcoming audit presentation and a discussion at the November
Public Works meeting. If it is increased, a new 5-year proposal will be provided and an amendment will be
made to this contract. The city wishes to proceed with scheduled work and he recommends approval of the
$84,990 design engineering contract. This will move to City Council regular agenda.
5. PW 2023-83 Kylyns Ridge Subdivision Traffic Sign Analysis
A summary of this matter was presented by Mr. Sanderson. There were concerns raised in this area about
speeding and additional signage. The four intersections in question were observed by engineering staff for
possible modification of signage. Based on standard criteria, none of the intersections warranted any changes.
They also looked at speed over a 7-day period. For 3 intersections, most traffic was in the speed range. They
are not recommending any modifications at this time, but they suggested looking at it again in the future.
Alderman Funkhouser said this matter had been brought forth by some of the residents. He said he is just
looking for traffic-calming measures including lane-striping for perceived lane narrowing, lane bumps and
landscaping in the parkway. He said Aurora has used some of these methods successfully. He would like to
look at this again next month. He noted there is only one street that has parking on one side only and he said
residents like parking on both sides. Mr. Sanderson said a traffic-calming packet had been assembled a few
years ago and he will bring that to the next meeting.
Old Business: None
Additional Business:
There was no further business and the meeting adjourned at 6:24pm.
Minutes respectfully transcribed from audio by
Marlys Young, Minute Taker (absent from meeting)
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #1
Tracking Number
PW 2023-84
Proposed Rt 47 Improvements
Public Works Committee – November 21, 2023
None
Informational
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
This memo is to provide an update for the proposed Rt 47 improvements by IDOT. IDOT is
planning the following projects:
Yorkville to Sugar Grove ($110M)
This project is proposed to be broken into three separate construction contracts as follows:
Kennedy Road to Water Park Way (Yorkville)
Water Park Way to Jericho Road (Yorkville)
Jericho Road to Cross Street
Final Plans are being developed for each section and have been submitted to the City for review.
Construction schedules are currently being developed but could begin as early as late 2024.
Soon, IDOT will be providing agreements for the City to consider and approve to finalize the
breakdown of costs and maintenance expectations.
Attached are high level exhibits that depict the proposed locations of grassed medians, shared-
use paths and traffic signals.
In addition, we have identified several sections of conflicts with the City’s water main and
sanitary sewer infrastructure. In areas where the City has existing easements, the relocation cost
will be paid for by IDOT. In the other areas that are within existing IDOT row, the cost will
most likely have to be borne by the City. The area near the Wrigley facility would fall into this
category.
Caton Farm Road to Rt 71 ($42M)
Final Plans are being developed and have been submitted to the City for review. Construction
schedule is currently being developed but could begin as early as late 2024.
Soon, IDOT will be providing an agreement for the City to consider and approve to finalize the
breakdown of costs and maintenance expectations.
Attached are high level exhibits that depict the proposed locations of grassed medians, shared-
use paths and traffic signals.
In addition, we have identified several sections of conflicts with the City’s water main
infrastructure. It is likely that the cost will have to be borne by the City since the water main was
constructed with existing IDOT row.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Date: November 14, 2023
Subject: Rt 47 Improvements
Jericho
BridgeB e r t r a m
Ba s e li ne
Bristol Bay
GarritanoBurnettCamdenHalf MoonWinchesterBarrettCopyright nearmap 2015
Engineering Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6756
CO NTR ACT 62M71PROPOSED IM PROV EM EN TS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
NOVEMBER 2023
YO1103
H:\GIS\P UBLIC\Y ORKVILLE\20 11\
KKP ³United City of Yorkville
651 Prairie Pointe Dr Yorkville, IL 60560
YO1103-IDOT Contract 62M71BridgeGalena
B e r t r a m
Bristol Bay
GarritanoCamdenWinchesterCopyright nearmap 2015
500 0250 Feet
Legen d
Prop osed Traffic Sig nal
Prop osed Shared Use Path
Prop osed Grass Me diannearmap_u sRGB
Red: Band _1
Green : Band_2
Blue: Ba nd_3
Bri
dgeC a n n o n b a l l
BoomerLexingtonP
a
tri
ciaAmanda
K e n n e d y
Copyright nearmap 2015BridgeCorneils
W h e a t o n CommercialCopyright nearmap 2015
Engineering Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6756
CONTRACT 66989PROPOSED IM PROV EM EN TS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
NOVEMBER 2023
YO1103
H:\GIS\P UBLIC\Y ORKVILLE\20 11\
KKP ³United City of Yorkville
651 Prairie Pointe Dr Yorkville, IL 60560
YO1103-IDOT Contract 66989
400 0200 Feet
Legen d
Prop osed Traffic Sig nal
Prop osed Shared Use Path
Prop osed Grass Me dian
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GFGF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GFGF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GFGF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GFGF
GF
GFGF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GFGF
GF
GF
GF GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF GF
GF
GF
GF
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(BridgeGalena
Be r tr a m BurnettGarritano
WinchesterCopyright nearmap 2015
Engineering Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6756
IDOT CONTRACT - 62M7 WATER MAIN LOCATION MAPwww.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
OCTOBER 2023
YO1103
H:\GIS \PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT ³United City of Yorkville
651 Prairie Pointe Dr.Yorkville, IL 60560
800 0400 Feet
Legend
!(VALVE
GF HYDRANTWater MainUNKNOWN WATER MAINDiameter3" WATER MAIN AND SMALLER4" WATER MAIN6" WATER MAN8" WATER MAIN10" WATER MAIN12" WATER MAIN16" WATER MAIN
YO1103-IDOT Contract 62M7 Water Main Potential Relocation
WATER MAINTO BE RELOCATED(2,600 FT ~ $780,000)
GF GF GF
GF
GF
GFGFGF
GF
GFGF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF GF
GF GF GF GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF GF
GF GF
GF
GFGF
GF
GF GF GF
GF
GF GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GFGF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GFGF
GF
GFGF
GF
GF GF GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GFGF
GFGF
GF GF
GFGF
GF
GF GF GF
GF
GF
GF GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GFGF
GF
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(BridgeC o r n e i l s
C a n n o n b a l l
W h e a t o n
F a x o n
SumacF a ir h a v e n
E ld e n
A
la
n
D
ale TwinleafMcMurtrieRe d b u dCaledonia
BoomerNa tha n
C o m m e r c i a l
G o ld e n ro dJonathan
W in te rb e rry
CatalpaH o n e y s u c k leGabriel
P
a
tric
i
a
Ryan
AmandaD
o
v
er
F o n ta n a
EssexDoverCopyright nearmap 2015
Engineering Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6756
IDOT CONTRACT - 66989 WATER MAIN LOCATION MAPwww.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
NOVEMBER 2023
YO1103
H:\GIS \PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
MJT ³United City of Yorkville
651 Prairie Pointe Dr.Yorkville, IL 60560
1,200 0600 Feet
Legend
!(VALVE
GF HYDRANTWater MainUNKNOWN WATER MAINDiameter3" WATER MAIN AND SMALLER4" WATER MAIN6" WATER MAN8" WATER MAIN10" WATER MAIN12" WATER MAIN16" WATER MAIN
YO1103-IDOT Contract 66989 Water Main Potential Relocation
WATER MAINTO BE RELOCATED(2,700 FT ~ $810,000)
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.!.!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.BridgeC o r n e i l s
C a n n o n b a l l
W h e a t o n
F a x o n
SumacF a ir h a v e n
E ld e n
A
la
n
D
ale TwinleafMcMurtrieRe d b u dCaledonia
BoomerNa t h a n
C o m m e r c i a l
G o ld e n ro dJonathan
W in te rb e rry
CatalpaH o n e y s u c k leGabriel
P
a
tri
cia
Ryan
AmandaD
o
v
er
F o n ta n a
EssexDoverCopyright nearmap 2015
Engineering Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6756
IDOT CONTRACT - 66989SANITARY SEWERwww.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
OCTOBER 2023
YO1103
H:\GIS\P UBLIC\Y ORKVILLE\20 11\
MJT ³United City of Yorkville
651 Prairie Pointe Dr Yorkville, IL 60560
1,200 0600 Feet
Legend
R LIFT S TATION
!.SANITARY M ANHOLE
SANITARY FORCE MAIN
UNKN OW N SANITARY SEWER
4" SANITA RY SEWER
6" SANITA RY SEWER
8" SANITA RY SEWER
10" SANITA RY SEWER
12" SANITA RY SEWER
14" SANITA RY SEWER
15" SANITA RY SEWER
16" SANITA RY SEWER
18" SANITA RY SEWER
24" SANITA RY SEWER
30" SANITA RY SEWER
36" SANITA RY SEWER
42" SANITA RY SEWER
48" SANITA RY SEWER
YO1103-IDOT Contract 66989 Sanitary Sewer Potential Relocation
SA NITARY SEW ER TO BE RELO CATED(2 ,70 0 FT ~ $81 0,0 00)
Bridge
A m e n t
S tagecoachLegionR
ain
tr
e
e
S u t t o n
FairfaxKingsmillWindett RidgeBanburyWe
s
t
onH azeltineG
r
e
e
n
fi
e
l
d
ParksideW
aln
ut Murfield
BonnieWalshW
ythe
ConservationVill
a
ge
Vi
e
wS
arava
n
o
s
C
l
a
r
e
mo
n
t
FairfaxCopyright nearmap 2015
Engineering Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6756
CONTRACT D366825PROPOSED IM PROV EM EN TS
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
NOVEMBER 2023
YO1103
H:\GIS\P UBLIC\Y ORKVILLE\20 11\
KKP ³United City of Yorkville
651 Prairie Pointe Dr Yorkville, IL 60560
YO1103-IDOT Contract D366825 PenmanWa l k e r
C a t o n F a r m
Copyright nearmap 2015
1,000 0500 Feet
Legen d
Prop osed Traffic Sig nal
Prop osed Shared Use Path
Prop osed Grass Me dian
Bridge
LegionS tagecoachKingsmillR
ai
n
tr
e
e
Sut
t
onBanbur
yFairfaxWe
s
t
o
n
Windett RidgeH azeltineJ
e
s
s
eAster Wal
nut
Mur
f
i
el
dWalshBonnieW
ythe
ConservationVill
a
ge
Vi
e
wS
ara
v
a
n
o
s
Forest Preserve
ClaremontCandleberryT o m m y H u g h e s
PhelpsDrayt
onW in terth u rSt Joseph'sHarrisB a l t r u s o l
Copyright nearmap 2015
Engineering Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6756
ROUTE 47 SOUTHWATER MAIN LO CATION M APwww.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
OCTOBER 2023
YO1104
H:\GIS\P UBLIC\Y ORKVILLE\20 11\
MJT ³United City of Yorkville
651 Prairie Pointe Dr Yorkville, IL 60560
1,000 0500 Feet
Legend
Water MainUNKNOWN WATER MAINDiameter3" WATER MAIN AND SMALLER4" WATER MAIN6" WATER MAN8" WATER MAIN10" WATER MAIN12" WATER MAIN16" WATER MAIN
YO1104-IDOT South Contract Water Main Potential Water main Relocation
WATER MAINTO BE RELOCATED(7,500 FT ~ $2,250,000)
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #2
Tracking Number
PW 2023-85
KKCOM Call for Projects – Application
Public Works Committee – November 21, 2023
Majority
Consideration of Approval
Application Consideration
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
Background:
The Kane-Kendall Council of Mayors (KKCOM) recently announced a call for projects.
Generally, KKCOM funds three types of projects, Reconstruction, Minor Rehabilitation and
Preservation (Resurfacing). In recent times, the City has taken advantage of the program and has
received funding for Game Farm Road (Reconstruction), Cannonball Trail (Resurfacing), Mill
Street (Resurfacing) and Bristol Ridge Road (Resurfacing).
Question Presented:
Should the City submit an application for the 2023 Call for Projects?
Discussion:
In order to be eligible for federal funding, a roadway must have a FAU Route designation. An
exhibit indicating the FAU routes in the City is attached.
Staff has reviewed the City’s eligible roadways and is recommending the following:
Resubmit East Van Emmon Street for this call. Recall that this roadway is currently on
the contingency list and there is a high level of probability that the City will receive
funding next year. The project is currently under design. If selected, the project would
be 75% funded (Construction only) by the KKCOM. We are estimating a total project
cost of $583,000 ($398,145 STP, $184,855 Local).
Submit an application for Kennedy Road as noted on the attached exhibit. Generally,
higher traffic volume streets have a better chance of receiving these funds and based on
review of the potential scoring, there is a reasonable change that this will be funded. This
project would be a reconstruction/widening and would include intersection improvements
at Bristol Ridge along with potential curve improvements. We are estimating a total
project cost of $3,123,000 ($2,193,000 STP, $930,000 Local). The detailed cost estimate
is also attached for your information.
Action Required:
Consideration of authorization to submit application for 2023 Call for Projects.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Date: November 14, 2023
Subject: KKCOM – Call for Projects
()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-
()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-(
)-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-
()-()-()-()-()-(
)
-
(
)
-()-()-
()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-(
)-()-()-()-()-
()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-(
)
-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-(
)
-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-(
)-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-
()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-(
)-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-(
)
-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-(
)-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-()-
()-()-()-Beecher RdMcHugh RdC o r n e i l s R d
E Spring St
RidgeSt
FairfaxWayJohn StR i v e r R d
PrairieCrossing DrBertram Dr
Bristol Ridge Rd
Galena Rd
G r e e nBriar R dDiehlFarm RdHighRidge LnU S H ighw ay 34McLellanBlvdSchoolhouse RdMill StE VanEmmon St
W Fox StCountryHills DrRosenwinkelSt G
ra
n
d
e Trl
Game Farm RdW River St
Bristol Bay Dr
Hunt St
Ra
i
nt
r
e
eRd SunsetAveCe
nt
er
Pkwy
E Countryside Pkwy
Mill Rd
V a n E m m o n R d
B a s e l i n e Rd
Tuscany TrlC a n n o n b a l l T r lAshe RdE Highpoint RdFaxon Rd
Alan Dale LnLe gi on Rd S Bridge StA
m
eric
a
n
W
a
y
MarketviewDrKennedy RdFox R dE Veterans PkwyAliceAve N Bri
dge StW Highpoint RdW a te rp a rk
W a y
W Veterans PkwyEldamain RdS ta g e c o a c h
T ra ilW h e e l e r R d
Illinois Route #47G a t e s L n
Lisbon RdImmanuel RdAshley RdReservation RdE Beecher RdBlock RdW Beecher RdPenman RdA m e n t R d
Wa l k e r R dStagecoach TrlMinkler RdIllinois Route #126Illinois Route #71U S R o u te 30
Engineer ing Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6700www.eeiweb .com
DA TE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
YO2300
YO2300 FAU RO UTE MAP YOR KVILLE O WNE RSH IP.MXD
H:/GIS/PUBLIC/YORKVILLE/2023/YO2300
MJT
CITY OF YORKV ILLEKendall County, IL FAU ROUTE MAPCITY OF YORKVILLE -LOCATION MA PYORKVILLE'S JURISDICTION
SEPTEMBER 2023
3,900 0 3,9001,950 Feet
Legend
Minor Ar terial
Major Collector
Minor Collector
()-()-Yorkville Corporate Lim its
Concord Dr.Dickson RdGordon RdLakewood Creek Dr.Bertran RdJericho R d
ITEM UNIT
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT
1 TOPSOIL FURNISH AND PLACE, 4"
SQ YD 450.0 30.00$ 13,500.00$
2 SODDING, SALT TOLERANT
SQ YD 450.0 40.00$ 18,000.00$
3 SUPPLEMENTAL WATERING
UNIT 10.0 10.00$ 100.00$
4 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS (TACK COAT) POUND 6,860.0 0.10$ 686.00$
5 POLYMERIZED LEVELING BINDER, IL-4.75, N50 TON 590.0 100.00$ 59,000.00$
6 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE REMOVAL - BUTT JOINT
SQ YD 400.0 15.00$ 6,000.00$
7 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX "D", N50 TON 1,170.0 75.00$ 87,750.00$
8 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 5 INCH
SQ FT 5,215.0 7.50$ 39,112.50$
9 DETECTABLE WARNINGS
SQ FT 100.0 30.00$ 3,000.00$
10 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE REMOVAL, VARIABLE DEPTH
SQ YD 10,160.0 3.00$ 30,480.00$
11 COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL
FOOT 440.0 5.00$ 2,200.00$
12 SIDEWALK REMOVAL
SQ FT 5,215.0 1.50$ 7,822.50$
13 CLASS D PATCHES, TYPE II, 5 INCH SQ YD 110.0 50.00$ 5,500.00$
14 CLASS D PATCHES, TYPE III, 5 INCH SQ YD 110.0 45.00$ 4,950.00$
15 CLASS D PATCHES, TYPE IV, 5 INCH SQ YD 310.0 40.00$ 12,400.00$
16 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER,TYPE B-6.12
FOOT 440.0 40.00$ 17,600.00$
17 MOBILIZATION
L SUM 1.0 19,000.00$ 19,000.00$
18 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION, STANDARD 701501
L SUM 1.0 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$
19 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION, STANDARD 701801
L SUM 1.0 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$
20 CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN
CAL DAY 60.0 60.00$ 3,600.00$
21 SHORT-TERM PAVEMENT MARKING
FOOT 660.0 3.00$ 1,980.00$
22 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 4"
FOOT 1,310.0 2.00$ 2,620.00$
23 WORK ZONE PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL
SQ FT 220.0 5.00$ 1,100.00$
24 INLETS TO BE ADJUSTED
EACH 5.0 400.00$ 2,000.00$
25 MANHOLES TO BE ADJUSTED
EACH 5.0 750.00$ 3,750.00$
26 SANITARY MANHOLES TO BE ADJUSTED
EACH 5.0 1,250.00$ 6,250.00$
27 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 4"
FOOT 6,142.0 1.00$ 6,142.00$
28 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 24"
FOOT 40.0 5.00$ 200.00$
29 INCIDENTAL HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACING
TON 40.0 150.00$ 6,000.00$
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS (A) 373,243.00$
Cost estimate assumes 1" poly level binder, 2" surface & 5% patching
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS (A) - SEE FIRST SHEET 373,243.00$
CONTINGENCY (10%) (B=A*0.1) 37,330.00$
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST WITH CONTINGENCY AND 4% INFLATION UNTIL 2025 (C=A*1.04^3+B) 473,980.00$
PHASE II ENGINEERING (11%) (E = 0.11*C) 52,140.00$
RIGHT OF WAY (F) -$
PHASE III ENGINEERING AND MATERIAL TESTING (12%) (G=0.12*C) 56,880.00$
ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL (H = C+D+E+F+G) 583,000.00$
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
LAFO IMPROVEMENTS
E. VAN EMMON STREET (FAU 2515)
FROM IL ROUTE 47 TO CITY LIMITS
2611 LF, 36' E-E ON AVERAGE
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SUGAR GROVE, ILLINOIS 2022 STP APPLICATION
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
LAFO IMPROVEMENTS
E. VAN EMMON STREET (FAU 2515)
FROM IL ROUTE 47 TO CITY LIMITS
2611 LF, 36' E-E ON AVERAGE
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, IL
STP Funding
Percentage
Engineering - Phase I: 0%
Engineering - Phase II: 0%
ROW: 0%
Engineering - Phase III: 75%
Construction: 75%
Funding Projected
Request Fiscal Year
Engineering - Phase I: -$
Engineering - Phase II: -$ FY25
ROW: -$
Engineering - Phase III: 42,660.00$ FY26
Construction: 355,485.00$ FY26
Total: 398,145.00$
Local
Funding
Engineering - Phase I: -$
Engineering - Phase II: 52,140.00$
ROW: -$
Engineering - Phase III: 14,220.00$
Construction: 118,495.00$
Total: 184,855.00$
G:\Public\Yorkville\2022\YO2204-C 2022 STP Call for Projects-Yorkville\Eng\East Van Emmons Street\[Van Emmon Street LAFO.xls]Yorkville
Local Funding
Percentage
100%
100%
25%
Estimated Cost
(enter most recent cost)
-$
52,140.00$
-$
100%
25%
56,880.00$
473,980.00$
583,000.00$
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SUGAR GROVE, ILLINOIS 2022 STP APPLICATION
W VanEmmon St
W Fox St
E Fox StS Bridge StW HydraulicAve
Van Emmon Rd
Bell StE Hydraulic Ave
E Van Emmon St
Heustis StMill StE Ridge St
Benjamin StLegend
Project Limits
Engineering Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6700
E. VAN EMMON STREETLOCATION MAPwww.eeiweb.com DATE
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
FEBRUARY 2022
YO2204
YO2204 VanEmmon Street Location Map
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2022\
MJT
NO.REVISIONS ³Un ited City of Yorkville800 Game Farm RoadYorkville, IL 60560630-553-4350www.yorkville.il.us
200 0 200100 Feet
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
JOB NO:
DESIGNED:
DATE:
PROJECT TITLE:
ITEM UNIT
NO.UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT
1 CY 2,025 50.00$ 101,250.00$
2 CY 2,200 50.00$ 110,000.00$
3 SY 3,450 3.00$ 10,350.00$
4 LF 4,460 4.50$ 20,070.00$
5 CY 175 40.00$ 7,000.00$
6 SY 3,450 20.00$ 69,000.00$
7 LB 17,500 1.00$ 17,500.00$
8 SY 140 30.00$ 4,200.00$
9 SY 22,710 3.50$ 79,485.00$
10 TON 1,125 100.00$ 112,500.00$
11 TON 1,500 125.00$ 187,500.00$
12 TON 3,000 105.00$ 315,000.00$
13 SF 400 25.00$ 10,000.00$
14 SF 400 10.00$ 4,000.00$
15 LF 150 100.00$ 15,000.00$
16 SY 460 20.00$ 9,200.00$
17 SY 3,025 30.00$ 90,750.00$
18 LSUM 1 40,000.00$ 40,000.00$
19 LSUM 1 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$
20 SY 375 45.00$ 16,875.00$
21 SY 750 45.00$ 33,750.00$
22 SY 2,275 60.00$ 136,500.00$
23 SY 7,500 12.00$ 90,000.00$
24 LSUM 1 110,000.00$ 110,000.00$
25 LSUM 1 100,000.00$ 100,000.00$
26 LSUM 1 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$
TOTAL 1,765,000.00$
20% CONTINGENCY 353,000.00$
2,118,000.00$
2,478,000.00$
PHASE I ENGINEERING (8%)198,240.00$
PHASE II ENGINEERING (8%)198,240.00$
PHASE III ENGINEERING (10%)247,800.00$
TOTAL PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 3,122,280.00$
ESTIMATED FEDERAL SHARE 2,193,030.00$
ESTIMATED CITY SHARE 929,250.00$
52 Wheeler Road, Sugar Grove, IL 60554 Tel: 630.466.6700 Fax: 630.466.6701 www.eeiweb.com
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Traffic Control and Protection
Restoration
Partial Depth Patching
YO2333-C
JHS
November 10, 2023
Kennedy Road Improvements - Emerald Ln to Freedom Dr
Hot-Mix Asphalt Surface Removal - Butt Joint
Geotechnical Fabric for Ground Stabilization
Perimeter Erosion Barrier
ITEM
Earth Excavation
Bituminous Materials (Tack Coat)
Removal and Disposal of Unsuitable Material
Aggregage Subgrade Improvement, 12"
Aggregate Subgrade Improvement
TOTAL ESTIMATE PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST WITH INFLATION (4%) (2028)
Aggregate Shoulders, Type B 4"
Hot-Mix Asphalt Surface Removal, 3"
Hot-Mix Asphalt Binder Course, IL-19.0, N70
Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk, 5 Inch
Sidewalk Removal
Combination Concrete Curb and Gutter Removal and Replacement
Pavement Removal
Polymerized Hot-Mix Asphalt Binder Course, IL-4.75, N50
Hot-Mix Asphalt Surface Course, IL-9.5, Mix "D", N70
Thermoplastic Pavement Markings
Hot-Mix Asphalt Bike Path Removal and Replacement
Hot-Mix Asphalt Driveway Removal and Replacement
Drainage Improvements
Traffic Staging
Mobilization
G:\Public\Yorkville\2023\YO2333-C 2023 KKCOM Call for Projects\Meetings\Kennedy Road Improvements - Preliminary Cost Estimate
KENNEDYG
R
A
N
D
E
B
RIS
T
O
L RID
G
E RICKARDROUTE 34MCLELLANALDENOAKCANNONBALL MATLOCKB E R R Y W O O D
JETEROLD GLORY
LIL
A
C JUSTICEL E W I S
LIL
LIA
N SUNSETPLUMROODHUNT
CRYDERS E E L E Y
E
M
E
R
A
L
D
E D Y T H E
ROYAL OAKS
SLATEA N N A MA R I A
CHARLESCROSSBURRRUBYS
Q
UIR
E
A
M
ERIC
A
N CRANSTONELLSWORTHLEHMANSOUTH
NORTH
HENNINGCONSTI TUTIONDIVISIONHOBBSF R E E D O M
P
A
R
K
W
AYGROVE LYNCLIFFD R IV E W A Y
VIOLETLYMANREHBEHNLAKEVIEW PATRIOTD
AVID
B R I S T O L
GRANDE TRAILDIVISIONDRIVEWAYDRIVEWAY
Copyright nearmap 2015
Engineering Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6700
KENNEDY RDLOCATION MAPwww.eeiweb.com DATE
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
NOVEMBER 2023
YO2333
YO2333 Kennedy Rd.MXD
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2023\
MJT
NO.REVISIONS ³United City of Yorkville
651 Prairie Pointe Dr.York ville, IL 6 0560
www.yorkville.il.us
1,400 0700 Feet
Legend
Project Limits
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #3
Tracking Number
PW 2023-86
Fox Hill and Sunflower SSA area operational maintenance
Public Works Committee – November 21, 2023
None
Informational
Brief overview of upcoming maintenance in Fox Hill and Sunflower areas
Eric Dhuse Public Works
Name Department
Summary
An overview of the upcoming years maintenance services for the Fox Hill and Sunflower
SSA areas.
Background
The Fox Hill SSA was started in 2004 and the Sunflower Estates SSA was started in
2007. In both cases, the HOA did not form when the subdivisions were at a point where the
developer turns over the maintenance to the HOA. The city stepped in and created back up
SSA’s for the maintenance of the common areas. Since that time, the city has managed these
subdivision open areas to maintain entry ways, boulevards, trails, and ponds.
Below is a breakdown of each subdivisions work items that are contemplated each year
before submitting the levy to the county.
Fox Hill
Mowing – approximately 5 acres of turf grass, mainly adjacent to the trail system that
runs throughout the single family portion only, of this development. Mowing also
includes mechanical string trimming of all trees and the asphalt trail. We also provide
fertilization and weed control for all turf grass areas. Trimming along private fences is
NOT included in mowing, all fences are maintained privately. We have seen a dramatic
increase in mowing and general maintenance costs over the last contract. The increase
for mowing was 100% from the last contract.
Tree trimming – Fox Hill was constructed from the mid 90’s through the mid 00’s, so the
trees are mature and need trimming from time to time. We have increased our trimming
program as the trees have matured. We now also have trees that are dying and trees that
have roots that are buckling the trail system. We are addressing them as needed.
General maintenance – this is for areas that may have grass die back, erosion, graffiti, or
other items that are not specifically covered. We have our mowing contractor supply us
with hourly wages in the contract, so the costs are known.
Sign Maintenance – There was an entry sign to the subdivision at the corner of Diehl
Farm Rd. and Rt. 34 before the widening of Rt. 34 occurred. IDOT paid the city $23,000
for the right to remove the sign and widen the highway. This money is still in the
account to replace the sign. It has proven very difficult to find a suitable location for a
Memorandum
To: Public Works Committee
From: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator
Date: November 13, 2023
Subject: Fox Hill and Sunflower SSA Maintenance Services
replacement sign of any size. Without purchasing land or obtaining an easement for the
sign, we will have to replace the sign with something much smaller. At this time, I
cannot find a suitable site for the sign where it will be able to be seen from Rt. 34 as an
entrance monument should. My last chance will be to work with the developer of the
senior housing site on Sycamore Rd. to see if there is any place for an easement for the
sign. If not, I would recommend that we put the money from IDOT into the maintenance
of the SSA area and not have an entry sign.
Trail maintenance – Fox Hill had been constructed for quite some time before the city
took over administration and maintenance of the common areas. When we took over, the
trails needed work and have been patched and sealed twice under our supervision. We
are planning on having them crack filled and sealed again next year. I have also included
a line item in the 5 year plan for 10% replacement every time we seal the trail after 2024.
With some portions of the trail turning 30 in the coming years, we need to include some
replacement costs in the budget.
Sunflower Estates
Mowing – approximately 5 acres of turf grass. The areas consist of the entrances and
around the three storm water basins. This also mechanical string trimming of all
landscape areas and sidewalk. Fertilization and weed control are also provided for all
turf grass areas.
Tree trimming – Sunflower has many mature trees at both entrances and along the
parkway of the north stormwater basin. These trees must be trimmed from time to time.
We significantly trimmed and removed trees at the north entry this year and will have to
reshape the mulch area and re-landscape the area next year. In addition, we need to
trim/remove trees and shrubs on the south boulevard. The mugo pines are original to the
development and are now reaching their end of life. They have also become so large that
they are crowding/competing with the trees causing some of both to become misshapen
with no way to trim them without potentially killing them. There are also pear trees that
need to be removed and a maple tree that is dying. This will be a big change in the way it
looks, but it will be better for all of the plants in the long run.
General maintenance – this is for areas that may have grass die back, erosion, graffiti, or
other items that are not specifically covered. Landscape plantings are also contemplated
in this area. Sunflower has perennials near the entrance signs that need replacement from
time to time. We have our mowing contractor supply us with hourly wages in the
contract, so the costs are known.
Pond Maintenance – Sunflower has three stormwater basins. This has been the largest
expense for this SSA area. Some years ago, it was decided to naturalize these basins to
ensure proper function and to avoid dredging the pond bottoms due to silting. Instead of
raising the levy to a very high amount, the city paid for the naturalization and the SSA
area is repaying the city over time. This will increase the levy gradually instead of a
sudden increase to the residents. To maintain these basins, it is necessary for us to
perform a controlled burn in the early spring. From there, we will be able to assess the
overall health of the area and decide if we need to add more plants or leave everything as
it is.
Sign Maintenance – we contemplate any repairs, maintenance, or replacement of the
entryway signs to the subdivision.
Recommendation
This is an informational item.
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #4
Tracking Number
PW 2023-87
2023 Road to Better Roads Program - MFT
Public Works Committee – November 21, 2023
Majority
Recommendation to Approve Request for Change in Plans
and Final Payment Estimate
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
Recommendation to Approve Request for Change in Plans and
Final Payment Estimate
The 2023 Road to Better Roads Program was awarded to D. Construction 1488 S. Broadway
Coal City, IL 60416 at total awarded value of $1,197,204.31. The project is now complete and
accepted.
The project came in $22,229.78 under budget for a Final Construction Cost of $1,174,974.53.
Due to the use of Motor Fuel Tax Funds, the Request for Change in plans and Engineer’s Final
Payment Estimate needs to be approved by IDOT before final payment can be made.
We recommend that the City approve the Request for Change in Plans and Engineer’s Final
Payment Estimate.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please let us know.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director
Jori Behland, City Clerk
Date: November 8, 2023
Subject: 2023 Road to Better Roads - MFT
Request for Approval of Change of Plans
BLR 13210 (Rev. 10/20/23)Page 1 of 3Completed11/08/23
Local Public Agency
United City of Yorkville
County
Kendall
Route
Various Local Roads
Section Number
23-00000-00-GM
Request Number
1 Final
Contractor
D. Construction Inc.
Address
1488 S. Broadway
City
Coal City
State
IL
Zip Code
60416
Date
11/06/23
I recommend that this Deduction be made
The estimated quantities are shown below and the contractor agrees to furnish the materials and do the work at the unit prices.
from the above contract.
Item Description Unit of
Measure Quantity Unit Price
Addition (A)
or Deduction
(D)
Total Addition Total Deduction
-Supplemental Watering Unit 10 $220.0000 D $0.0000 $2,200.0000
-Bituminous Materials (Tack Coat)Pound 18982 $0.0100 D $0.0000 $189.8200
-Hot-Mix Asphalt Surface Removal
- Butt Joint Sq Yd 55 $0.0100 D $0.0000 $0.5500
-Hot-Mix Asphalt Binder Course,
IL-9.5, N50 Ton 161 $76.0000 D $0.0000 $12,236.0000
-Hot-Mix Asphalt Surface Course,
IL-9.5, Mix "D", N50 Ton 49 $76.5000 D $0.0000 $3,748.5000
-Sidewalk Removal Sq Ft 1155 $2.7500 A $3,176.2500 $0.0000
-Portland Cement Concrete
Sidewalk, 5 Inch Sq Ft 1319 $9.3500 A $12,332.6500 $0.0000
-Detectable Warnings Sq Ft 35 $35.2000 A $1,232.0000 $0.0000
-Combination Concrete Curb and
Gutter Removal and Replacement Foot 124 $44.0000 A $5,456.0000 $0.0000
-Hot-Mix Asphalt Surface Removal,
Variable Depth Sq Yd 196 $2.5000 D $0.0000 $490.0000
-Hot-Mix Asphalt Surface Removal,
3"Sq Yd 298 $2.7500 D $0.0000 $819.5000
-Partial Depth Patching (Special)Sq Yd 427 $45.0000 D $0.0000 $19,215.0000
-Routing and Sealing Cracks Foot 405 $0.6400 D $0.0000 $259.2000
-Manholes To Be Adjusted Each 1 $800.0000 D $0.0000 $800.0000
-Inlets To Be Adjusted Each 14 $440.0000 A $6,160.0000 $0.0000
-Sanitary Manholes To Be Adjusted Each 1 $880.0000 D $0.0000 $880.0000
-Type 3 Frame and Grate Each 1 $550.0000 A $550.0000 $0.0000
-Thermoplastic Pavement Marking
- Letters & Symbols Sq Ft 347 $6.0500 D $0.0000 $2,099.3500
-Thermoplastic Pavement Marking
- Line 4"Foot 2157 $0.6600 D $0.0000 $1,423.6200
-Thermoplastic Pavement Marking
- Line 6"Foot 506 $0.9900 A $500.9400 $0.0000
-Thermoplastic Pavement Marking
- Line 8"Foot 1238 $1.3800 D $0.0000 $1,708.4400
BLR 13210 (Rev. 10/20/23)Page 2 of 3Completed11/08/23
Item Description Unit of
Measure Quantity Unit Price
Addition (A)
or Deduction
(D)
Total Addition Total Deduction
-Thermoplastic Pavement Marking
- Line 12"Foot 474 $3.0300 D $0.0000 $1,436.2200
-Thermoplastic Pavement Marking
- Line 24"Foot 120 $5.5000 D $0.0000 $660.0000
-Modified Urethane Pavement
Marking - Letters & Symbols Sq Ft 11 $5.9400 A $65.3400 $0.0000
-Modified Urethane Pavement
Marking - Line 4"Foot 102 $1.2700 A $129.5400 $0.0000
-Modified Urethane Pavement
Marking - Line 6"Foot 2004 $1.8700 A $3,747.4800 $0.0000
-Modified Urethane Pavement
Marking - Line 12"Foot 155 $2.9700 D $0.0000 $460.3500
-Modified Urethane Pavement
Marking - Line 24"Foot 53 $5.9400 A $314.8200 $0.0000
-Temporary Pavement Marking -
Line 4"Foot 297 $3.0000 D $0.0000 $891.0000
-Temporary Pavement Marking
Removal Sq Ft 100 $5.0000 D $0.0000 $500.0000
-Aggregate Surface Removal, 4"Sq Yd 133 $10.0000 D $0.0000 $1,330.0000
-Preparation of Base Sq Yd 580 $2.0000 D $0.0000 $1,160.0000
-Sodding, Special Sq Yd 271 $16.2500 A $4,403.7500 $0.0000
-Hot-Mix Asphalt Driveway
Removal and Replacement Sq Yd 18 $57.0000 D $0.0000 $1,026.0000
-Recessed Reflective Pavement
Marker Each 90 $71.5000 D $0.0000 $6,435.0000
-Raised Reflective Pavement
Marker Removal Each 9 $10.0000 D $0.0000 $90.0000
-Emulsified Maltene-Based
Rejuvenator Sq Yd 76 $2.0000 D $0.0000 $152.0000
-Crack Routing (Pavement)Foot 150 $0.0300 D $0.0000 $4.5000
-Crack Filling Pound 50 $1.6700 D $0.0000 $83.5000
Total Changes $38,068.77 $60,298.55
Add Row
Total net deduction ($22,229.78)-1.86%of the contract price.which isto date
Total Net Change ($22,229.78)
Amount of Original Contract $1,197,204.31
Amount of Previous Change Orders $0.00
Amount of adjusted/final contract $1,174,974.53
State fully the nature and reason for the change
Balance quantities based on as-built conditions. See attached for explanation of items increased or decreased
over $10,000
When the net increase or decrease in the cost of the contract is $10,000.00 or more, or the time of completion is increased or decreased
by 30 days or more, one of the following statements must be checked:
The Local Public Agency has determined that the circumstances which necessitate this change were not reasonably
foreseeable at the time the contract was signed.
The Local Public Agency has determined that the change is germane to the original contract as signed.
The Local Public Agency has determined that this change is in the best interest of the Local Public Agency and is
authorized by law.
BLR 13210 (Rev. 10/20/23)Page 3 of 3Completed11/08/23
Prepared By
Christopher J. Ott
Title of Preparer
Project Manager
Submitted/Approved
BY:
Local Public Agency Signature & Date
Title:Mayor
Approved:
Illinois Department of Transportation
For a Road District project County Engineer signature required.
County Engineer/Superintendent of HighwaysSignature & Date
Regional Engineer Signature & Date
IDOT Department Use Only
Received Location
Received Date Additional Location?
WMFT Entry By Entry Date
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 2023 MFT (ROADS TO BETTER ROADS PROGRAM) SECTION 23-00000-00-GM BLR 13210 SUPPLEMENT EXPLANATION OF PAY ITEM CHANGES IN EXCESS OF $10,000
HOT-MIX ASPHALT BINDER COURSE, IL-9.5., N50 (161 TONS DEDUCTED AT $76.00/TON
= $12,236.00
This item was decreased based on existing field conditions and reflects actual delivered tonnages.
PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 5 INCH (1,319 SQ FT ADDED AT $9.35/SQ
FT = $12,332.65)
This item was increased in quantity due to additional sidewalk deterioration that occurred between design and construction of the project.
PARTIAL DEPTH PATCHING (SPECIAL) (427 SQ YD DEDUCTED AT $45.00/SQ YD =
$19,215.00)
This item was reduced in quantity due to existing pavement conditions not needing to be patched.
Engineer's Payment EstimateBLR 13230 (Rev. 10/20/23)Page 1 of 4Completed11/08/23Local Public AgencyUnited City of YorkvilleCountyKendallRoute(s) (Street/Road)Various Local RoadsSection Number23-00000-00-GMEstimate 5FinalPayable to NameD. Construction Inc.Address1488 S. Broadway Coal City, IL 60416Date From11/06/23Date To11/24/23Unit ofAwardedApproved Change in PlansCompleted to DatePay ItemsMeas.QuantityValuesAddedDeductedQuantityUnit PriceValueSupplemental WateringUnit10 $2,200.00100 $220.0000 Bituminous Materials (Tack Coat)Pound28946 $289.46189829964 $0.0100 $99.6400Hot-Mix Asphalt Surface Removal - Butt JointSq Yd413 $4.13 55358 $0.0100 $3.5800Hot-Mix Asphalt Binder Course, IL-9.5, N50Ton3556 $270,256.00 1613395 $76.0000 $258,020.0000 Hot-Mix Asphalt Surface Course, IL-9.5, Mix "D", N50Ton3686 $281,979.00 493637 $76.5000 $278,230.5000 Sidewalk RemovalSq Ft5500 $15,125.00 11556655 $2.7500 $18,301.2500Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk, 5 InchSq Ft5500 $51,425.00 13196819 $9.3500 $63,757.6500Detectable WarningsSq Ft332 $11,686.40 35367 $35.2000 $12,918.4000Combination Concrete Curb and Gutter Removal and ReplacementFoot2010 $88,440.00 1242134 $44.0000 $93,896.0000Hot-Mix Asphalt Surface Removal, Variable DepthSq Yd32982 $82,455.00 19632786 $2.5000 $81,965.0000Hot-Mix Asphalt Surface Removal, 3"Sq Yd9306 $25,591.50 2989008 $2.7500 $24,772.0000Partial Depth Patching (Special)Sq Yd427 $19,215.00 4270 $45.0000Routing and Sealing CracksFoot19683 $12,597.12 40519278 $0.6400 $12,337.9200Manholes To Be AdjustedEach4 $3,200.0013 $800.0000 $2,400.0000 Inlets To Be AdjustedEach47 $20,680.00 1461 $440.0000 $26,840.0000
BLR 13230 (Rev. 10/20/23)Page 2 of 4Completed11/08/23Local Public AgencyUnited City of YorkvilleCountyKendallRoute(s) (Street/Road)Various Local RoadsSection Number23-00000-00-GMPay ItemsMeas.QuantityValuesAddedDeductedQuantityUnit PriceValueSanitary Manholes To Be AdjustedEach1 $880.0010 $880.0000 Type 1 Frame, Open LidEach4 $2,200.004 $550.0000 $2,200.0000 Type 3 Frame and GrateEach1 $550.0012 $550.0000 $1,100.0000 Thermoplastic Pavement Marking - Letters & SymbolsSq Ft1307 $7,907.35347960 $6.0500 $5,808.0000 Thermoplastic Pavement Marking - Line 4"Foot27168 $17,930.88 215725011 $0.6600 $16,507.2600Thermoplastic Pavement Marking - Line 6"Foot2266 $2,243.345062772 $0.9900 $2,744.2800 Thermoplastic Pavement Marking - Line 8"Foot2988 $4,123.4412381750 $1.3800 $2,415.0000 Thermoplastic Pavement Marking - Line 12"Foot1093 $3,311.79474619 $3.0300 $1,875.5700 Thermoplastic Pavement Marking - Line 24"Foot458 $2,519.00120338 $5.5000 $1,859.0000 Modified Urethane Pavement Marking - Letters & SymbolsSq Ft273 $1,621.6211284 $5.9400 $1,686.9600 Modified Urethane Pavement Marking - Line 4"Foot2792 $3,545.841022894 $1.2700 $3,675.3800 Modified Urethane Pavement Marking - Line 6"Foot4120 $7,704.4020046124 $1.8700 $11,451.8800Modified Urethane Pavement Marking - Line 12"Foot3183 $9,453.511553028 $2.9700 $8,993.1600 Modified Urethane Pavement Marking - Line 24"Foot737 $4,377.7853790 $5.9400 $4,692.6000 Temporary Pavement Marking - Line 4"Foot500 $1,500.00297203 $3.0000 $609.0000 Temporary Pavement Marking, RemovalSq Ft168 $840.0010068 $5.0000 $340.0000 Aggregate Surface Removal, 4"Sq Yd580 $5,800.00133447 $10.0000 $4,470.0000
BLR 13230 (Rev. 10/20/23)Page 3 of 4Completed11/08/23Local Public AgencyUnited City of YorkvilleCountyKendallRoute(s) (Street/Road)Various Local RoadsSection Number23-00000-00-GMPreparation of BaseSq Yd580 $1,160.005800 $2.0000Sodding, SpecialSq Yd1151 $18,703.75 2711422 $16.2500 $23,107.5000Hot-Mix Asphalt Driveway Removal and ReplacementSq Yd117 $6,669.001899 $57.0000 $5,643.0000 Recessed Reflective Pavement MarkerEach90 $6,435.00900 $71.5000Raised Reflective Pavement Marker RemovalEach90 $900.00981 $10.0000 $810.0000 Traffic Control and Protection, (Special)L Sum1 $15,000.00 1 $15,000.0000 $15,000.0000Emulsified Maltene-Based RejuvenatorSq Yd75742 $151,484.00 7675666 $2.0000 $151,332.0000 Crack Routing (Pavement)Foot60000 $1,800.0015059850 $0.0300 $1,795.5000 Crack FillingPound20000 $33,400.00 5019950 $1.6700 $33,316.5000Total $1,197,204.31Total $1,174,974.53Miscellaneous Extras and CreditsValuesTotal Miscellaneous Extras and CreditsTotal Value of Completed Work $1,174,974.53Deduct Retainage $0.00 Balance Due of Completed Work $1,174,974.53Miscellaneous DebitsValuesTotal Miscellaneous DebitsNet Cost of Section $1,174,974.53Previous Payments $1,145,612.55Net Amount Due $29,361.98 The LPA is under agreements of understanding and has completed the required paperwork and documentation, with submissions made per the agreement. The Local Public Agency (LPA) certifies that the above pay estimate quantities do not require submission to the Department of Transportation of a Change in Plans (BLR 13210).The LPA certifies that a Change in Plans (BLR 13210) has been submitted to, and approved by the Department of Transportation as required for the above quantities.
BLR 13230 (Rev. 10/20/23)Page 4 of 4Completed11/08/23Local Public AgencyUnited City of YorkvilleCountyKendallRoute(s) (Street/Road)Various Local RoadsSection Number23-00000-00-GMResident Engineer Signature & DateLocal Agency Signature & DatePrepared byChristopher J. OttTitleProject ManagerApprovedRegional Engineer Signature & DateReceived Location Received DateAdditional Location?WMFT Entry ByEntry DateIDOT Department Use Only
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
New Business #5
Tracking Number
PW 2023-88
Meeting Schedule for 2024
Public Works Committee – November 21, 2023
Majority
Approval
Proposed meeting schedule for 2024.
Jori Behland Administration
Name Department
Summary
Proposed 2024 meeting schedule for the Public Works Committee.
Meeting Schedule for 2024
Listed below are the proposed meeting dates for the Public Works Committee meeting
for 2024. The proposed schedule has the committee continuing to meet on the third Tuesday of
the month at 6:00 p.m.
January 16, 2024
February 20, 2024
March 19, 2024
April 16, 2024
May 21, 2024
June 18, 2024
July 16, 2024
August 20, 2024
September 17, 2024
October 15, 2024
November 19, 2024
December 17, 2024
Recommendation
Staff recommends review of the proposed meeting dates and time so that a meeting
schedule can be finalized for 2024.
Memorandum
To: Public Works Committee
From: Jori Behland, City Clerk
CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator
Date: November 8, 2023
Subject: Public Works Committee Meeting Schedule for 2024
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Community Development
Purchasing
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
Old Business #1
Tracking Number
PW 2023-83
Kylyns Ridge Subdivision Traffic Sign Analysis
Public Works Committee – November 21, 2023
PW – 10/17/23
A discussion took place at the 10/17/23
PW meeting.
PW 2023-83
None
Informational
Please see the attached memo.
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
As requested, we investigated the possible installation of a multi-way stop sign at the following
intersections:
•Northland Lane and Blackberry Shore Lane
•High Ridge Lane and Western Lane
•High Ridge Lane and Canyon Trail / Canyon Trail Court
We also investigated the possible installation of stop or yield signs at the following intersection:
•Northland Lane and Western Lane
Finally, a 7-day traffic speed study was conducted on the following streets:
•High Ridge Lane
•Northland Lane
•Blackberry Shore Lane
The governing entity on traffic control signage is the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). The manual states as follows in regards to multi-way stop sign installation:
Guidance:
The decision to install multi-way stop control should be based on an engineering study.
The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign
installation:
A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be
installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the
traffic control signal.
B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a
multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as
right-angle collisions.
C. Minimum volumes:
1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total
of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an
average day; and
2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from
the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per
hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at
least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but
3. If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the
minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and
2.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Jori Behland, City Clerk
James Jensen, Chief of Police
Date: October 10, 2023
Subject: Kylyn’s Ridge Subdivision – Traffic Sign and Speed Analyses
1
D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80
percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
Option:
Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include:
A.The need to control left-turn conflicts;
B.The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian
volumes;
C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to
negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design
and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational
characteristics of the intersection
The governing entity on traffic control signage is the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). The manual states as follows in regard to yield and stop sign installation:
Guidance:
Engineering judgment should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors
should be considered:
A.Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches;
B. Number and angle of approaches;
C. Approach speeds;
D.Sight distance available on each approach; and
E.Reported crash experience.
YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions
exist:
A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal
right-of-way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law;
B.A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or
C. An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area.
In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two
minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where
one or more of the following conditions exist:
A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all
approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day;
B.The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to
stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is
necessary; and/or
C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-
way at the intersection under the normal right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year
period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period.
Yield or Stop signs should not be used for speed control.
At unsigned intersections, the application of the normal right-of-way rules would apply.
2
Figure D taken from the Illinois Drivers Manual shows that the minor roadway should yield to traffic on
the major roadway at uncontrolled intersections.
Our findings were as follows:
•Northland Lane and Blackberry Shore Lane (Multi-Way Stop)
o Currently, the intersection has a stop sign on the northbound and southbound approaches
of Northland Lane.
o Parking is not permitted on the westbound lane of Blackberry Shore Lane after the
intersection.
o There are no sight distance constraints in any direction approaching the intersection.
o The Yorkville Police Department had reported no accidents at this intersection in the past
three years.
o The Blackberry Shore Lane bi-directional vehicle volume entering the intersection during
evening commute hours was less than 300 vehicles per hour (approx. 108 vehicles per
hour).
o The Northland Lane bi-directional vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the
intersection during evening commute hours was less than 200 units per hour (approx. 52
units per hour).
o The speed limit on all approaches was unmarked, therefore the speed limit was 30 mph.
o Left-turn conflicts do not appear to be an issue on any of the intersection approaches.
o A park is situated northwest of this intersection; however, no pedestrian traffic was
observed approaching the intersection during the study.
o This intersection does not appear to be a good candidate for a multi-way stop.
o It is our understanding that there may be a concern regarding speed on Blackberry Shore
Lane. Since the MUTCD states that yield or stop signs should not be used for speed
3
control, this issue may be more properly addressed with enforcement or traffic calming
devices if necessary.
•High Ridge Lane and Western Lane (Multi-Way Stop)
o Currently, the intersection has a yield sign on the eastbound and westbound approaches
of Western Lane.
o Parking is permitted on all approaches to the intersection.
o There are no sight distance constraints in any direction approaching the intersection.
o The Yorkville Police Department had reported one accident at this intersection in the past
three years (See attached crash report). In the incident, an eastbound vehicle on Western
Lane entered the intersection and struck a vehicle heading northbound on High Ridge
Lane. The eastbound driver stated they had not seen the vehicle travelling northbound.
The incident was not a turning incident.
o The High Ridge Lane bi-directional vehicle volume entering the intersection during
evening commute hours was less than 300 vehicles per hour (approx. 52 vehicles per
hour).
o The Western Lane bi-directional vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the
intersection during evening commute hours was less than 200 units per hour (approx. 30
units per hour).
o The speed limit on all approaches was unmarked, therefore the speed limit was 30 mph.
o Left-turn conflicts do not appear to be an issue on any of the intersection approaches. The
reported accident was not an issue of left-turn conflict.
o A total of 14 pedestrians were observed approaching the intersection during the study.
The area does not appear to need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts due to low
pedestrian volumes during peak hours.
o This intersection does not appear to be a good candidate for a multi-way stop.
•High Ridge Lane and Canyon Trail / Canyon Trail Court (Multi-Way Stop)
o Currently, the intersection has a yield sign on the eastbound approach of Canyon Trail
Court, and the westbound approach of Canyon Trail.
o Parking is permitted on all approaches to the intersection.
o A bus stop is located at the northeast corner of the intersection.
o The Yorkville Police Department had reported no accidents at this intersection in the past
three years.
o The High Ridge Lane bi-directional vehicle volume entering the intersection during
evening commute hours was less than 300 vehicles per hour (approx. 44 vehicles per
hour).
o The Canyon Trail Court / Canyon Trail bi-directional vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle
volume entering the intersection during evening commute hours was less than 200 units
per hour (approx. 29 units per hour).
o The speed limit on all approaches was unmarked, therefore the speed limit was 30 mph.
o There are no sight distance constraints in any direction approaching the intersection.
o Left-turn conflicts do not appear to be an issue on any of the intersection approaches. The
reported accident was not an issue of left-turn conflict.
o A total of 14 pedestrians were observed approaching the intersection during the study.
o This intersection does not appear to be a good candidate for a multi-way stop.
4
•Northland Lane and Western Lane (Stop or Yield Sign)
o Currently, there are no traffic signs at the intersection.
o Parking is not permitted on the westbound lane of Western Lane or the southbound Lane
of Northland Lane after the intersection.
o Cannonball Trail Park is directly southwest of the intersection.
o There are no sight distance constraints in any direction approaching the intersection.
o Neither street has a posted speed limit, therefore the speed limit is 30 mph on both streets.
o The traffic volume approaching the intersection appears to be below 2,000 units per day
(approx. 1,296 units per day).
o The Yorkville Police Department had reported no accidents at this intersection in the past
three years.
o A total of 0 pedestrians approached the intersection from any direction during the study.
o Based on the above criteria, this intersection does not appear to be a good candidate for
the stop sign or yield sign.
•High Ridge Lane (Traffic Speed Study)
o A 7-day, bi-directional, traffic speed study was conducted south of the intersection of
High Ridge Lane and Canyon Trail / Canyon Trail Court. A total of 2,894 vehicles were
examined. The average speed was 28.8 mph, the 85th percentile speed was 34.0 mph, and
the highest recorded speed was 65.0 mph, respectively. Since the MUTCD states that
yield or stop signs should not be used for speed control, the perceived speeding issue may
be more properly addressed with enforcement or traffic calming devices. However, the
traffic speed study does not indicate a speeding issue on High Ridge Lane.
•Northland Lane (Traffic Speed Study)
o A 7-day, bi-directional, traffic speed study was conducted north of the intersection of
Northland Lane and Western Lane. A total of 3,777 vehicles were examined. The average
speed was 25.8 mph, the 85th percentile speed was 30.0 mph, and the highest recorded
speed was 46.0 mph, respectively. Since the MUTCD states that yield or stop signs
should not be used for speed control, the perceived speeding issue may be more properly
addressed with enforcement or traffic calming devices. However, the traffic speed study
does not indicate a speeding issue on Northland Lane.
•Blackberry Shore Lane (Traffic Speed Study)
o A 7-day, bi-directional, traffic speed study was conducted west of the intersection of
Northland Lane and High Ridge Lane. A total of 7,629 vehicles were examined. The
average speed was 30.6 mph, the 85th percentile speed was 36.0 mph, and the highest
recorded speed was 59.0 mph, respectively. Since the MUTCD states that yield or stop
signs should not be used for speed control, the perceived speeding issue may be more
properly addressed with enforcement or traffic calming devices. However, the traffic
speed study does not indicate a speeding issue on Blackberry Shore Lane.
5
PART I:
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC SIGN ANALYSIS
6
No
r
t
h
l
a
n
d
Blackberr
y
S
h
o
r
e
Western CanyonRed TailAlan DaleCannonballCopyright nearmap 2015
0 100 200 Feet
KYLYN'S RIDGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFICSIGN ANALYSES
Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6700www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
OCTOBER 2023
YO1107
YO2107-Stop Sign Northland.mxd
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2021\
MJT ³
MULTI-WAYSTOP SIGN ANALYSIS
!"$
!"$
YIELD SIGNANALYSIS
EXISTING STOPSIGN LOCATIONS
7
WesternHigh RidgeIroquoisBlackberry Shore
Canyon
White Plains
Canyon Trail
Copyright nearmap 2015
0 100 200 Feet
Engineering Enterprises, Inc.52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630) 466-6700
KYLYN'S RIDGE SUBDIVISION TRAFFICSIGN ANALYSESwww.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
OCTOBER 2023
YO2107
YO2107-Stop Sign High Ridge.mxd
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2021\
MJT ³
MULTI-WAYSTOP SIGN ANALYSIS
%&'(%&'(
MULTI-WAYSTOP SIGN ANALYSIS
%&'(%&'(
EXISTING YIELD SIGN LOCATIONS (TYP.)
8
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Location: Northland Lane and Blackberry Shore Lane
Criteria Met Criteria**
Yes
Additional
Study
Required No
A.
B.
C.Minimum Volumes:
1.
2.
3.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Criteria are clearly met recommending installation of a multi-way stop
Criteria are not clearly met at this time - no further action recommended
Criteria may or may not be met - additional engineering study required
By:Gabrieil Braboy Date:9/11/2023
Title
By:Date:
Title
* Based upon Professional Engineer's Review** Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.
Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1 and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values, criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
Based on a preliminary review of the criteria for a multi-way stop sign the following action is recommended:
The need to control left-turn conflicts;
The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;
Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.
Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.
Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
The vehicular volume entering the intersections from the major street approaches (total of both approaches)averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and
The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersections from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but
MULTI-WAY STOP
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
Primary Criteria to Consider*
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
9
NORTHLAND LANE – NORTHBOUND APPROACH
LOOKING NORTH
NORTHLAND LANE – NORTHBOUND APPROACH
LOOKING EAST
10
NORTHLAND LANE – NORTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING WEST
NORTHLAND LANE – SOUTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING SOUTH
11
NORTHLAND LANE – SOUTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING EAST
NORTHLAND LANE – SOUTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING WEST
12
BLACKBERRY SHORE LANE – EASTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING EAST
BLACKBERRY SHORE LANE – EASTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING NORTH
13
BLACKBERRY SHORE LANE – EASTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING SOUTH
BLACKBERRY SHORE LANE – WESTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING WEST
14
BLACKBERRY SHORE LANE – WESTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING NORTH
BLACKBERRY SHORE LANE – WESTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING SOUTH
15
16
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Location: High Ridge Lane and Western Lane
Criteria Met Criteria**
Yes
Additional
Study
Required No
A.
B.
C.Minimum Volumes:
1.
2.
3.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Criteria are clearly met recommending installation of a multi-way stop
Criteria are not clearly met at this time - no further action recommended
Criteria may or may not be met - additional engineering study required
By:Gabriel Braboy Date:9/11/2023
Title
By:Date:
Title
* Based upon Professional Engineer's Review** Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
MULTI-WAY STOP
Primary Criteria to Consider*
Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.
Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
The vehicular volume entering the intersections from the major street approaches (total of both approaches)averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and
An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.
Based on a preliminary review of the criteria for a multi-way stop sign the following action is recommended:
The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersections from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but
If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.
Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1 and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values, criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
The need to control left-turn conflicts;
The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;
Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
17
HIGH RIDGE LANE – NORTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING NORTH
HIGH RIDGE LANE – NORTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING EAST
18
HIGH RIDGE LANE – NORTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING WEST
HIGH RIDGE LANE – SOUTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING SOUTH
19
HIGH RIDGE LANE – SOUTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING EAST
HIGH RIDGE LANE – SOUTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING WEST
20
WESTERN LANE – EASTBOUND APPROACH
LOOKING EAST
WESTERN LANE – EASTBOUND APPROACH
LOOKING NORTH
21
WESTERN LANE – EASTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING SOUTH
WESTERN LANE – WESTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING WEST
22
WESTERN LANE – WESTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING NORTH
WESTERN LANE – WESTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING SOUTH
23
24
IY003 * X002608966 *
11
11
4
4
þ
o
o
þ
o
o
4/23/2022 6:28
1 1
02 99
þ o
11-904 YK0002145
o o
230 Joshua Opp Sam Stroup, 209UNIT 1UNIT 2
1
2
3
1
2
3
(EVNO)(MOST)(EVNT)(LOC)DAMAGED PROPERTY OWNER NAME DAMAGED PROPERTY TIMEPOLICE NOTIFIED
PROPERTY OWNERS ADDRESS: STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP SECONDARYPRIMARY EMS NOTIFIED TIME
ARREST NAME
CITATIONS ISSUED PENDING SECTION CITATION NO.TIMEEMS ARRIVED
ARREST NAME
CITATIONS ISSUED PENDING SECTION CITATION NO.ROAD CLEARANCE TIME
OFFICER ID.SIGNATURE BEAT / DIST.SUPERVISOR ID.COURT DATE TIME
4/23/2022 6:28 o
þ
o
o
o
o
4/23/2022 6:28
o
þ
5/19/2022 8:30 þ
o
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
(UNIT)(SEAT)(DOB)(SEX)(SAFT)(AIR)(INJ)(EJCT)(EPTH)PASSENGERS & WITNESSES ONLY (NAME) / (ADDR) / (TEL)(HOSP)(EMS)UNIT 2UNIT 1
HOSPITAL (TAKEN TO)
EMS AGENCY
OWNER ADDRESS (STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP)PHONE NUMBER
POLICY NO.
PHONE NUMBER DRIVER LICENSE NO.
VEHICLE OWNER (LAST, FIRST, M.I.)
INSURANCE CO.EXPIRED
Y N
CITY STATE ZIP
VIN
STREET ADDRESS
PLATE NO.STATE YEAR
NAME (LAST, FIRST, M)
DATE OF BIRTH
mo / day / yr
MAKE MODEL YEAR
AUTOMATION
SYSTEM
Y NO UNK
LEVEL
IN
VEH.
LEVEL
ENGAGED
AT CRASHoþo0 0
CIRCLE NUMBER(S)
FOR DAMAGED AREA(S)
00 - NONE
13 - UNDER CARRIAGE
14 - TOTAL (ALL)
15 - OTHER
99 - UNKNOWN
POINT OF
FIRST CONTACT
TOWED
DUE TO CRASH
FIRE
DISTRACTED
Distraction Value*
COM VEH
Y N
IF YES SEE SIDEBAR*
HOSPITAL (TAKEN TO)
EMS AGENCY
OWNER STREET, CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE NUMBER
POLICY NO.
PHONE NUMBER DRIVER LICENSE NO.
VEHICLE OWNER (LAST, FIRST, M.I.)
INSURANCE CO.EXPIRED
Y N
CITY STATE ZIP
VIN
STREET ADDRESS
PLATE NO.STATE YEAR
DATE OF BIRTH
mo / day / yr
MAKE MODEL YEAR
AUTOMATION
SYSTEM
Y NO UNK
LEVEL
IN
VEH.
LEVEL
ENGAGED
AT CRASHoþo0 0
CIRCLE NUMBER(S)
FOR DAMAGED AREA(S)
00 - NONE
13 - UNDER CARRIAGE
14 - TOTAL (ALL)
15 - OTHER
99 - UNKNOWN
POINT OF
FIRST CONTACT
TOWED
DUE TO CRASH
FIRE
DISTRACTED
Distraction Value*
COM VEH
Y N
IF YES SEE SIDEBAR*
ADDRESS NO.HIGHWAY OR STREET NAME
COUNTY
City Township
(CIRCLE)(CIRCLE)
........................ FT / MI N S E W
AT INTERSECTION WITH
______________________________________________________________
(NAME OF INTERSECTION OR ROAD FEATURE)
DATE OF CRASH
DOORING
WITH
PEDALCYCLIST?
INTERSECTION
RELATED Y N
PRIVATE
PROPERTY Y N
HIT & RUN Y N
TIME
# OF MOTOR
VEHICLES INVLD
AM
PM
SECONDARY CRASH
o þYES NO
FLOW CONDITION
SLOW
STOPPED
FREE FLOW
o
o
þ
þoo
ON SCENE
NOT ON SCENE (DESK REPORT)
AMENDED
þ
o
A No Injury / Drive Away
B Injury and / or Tow Due to Crash
o
o
þ
$500 OR LESS
$501 - $1,500
OVER $1,500
DAMAGE TO ANY
ONE PERSON'S
VEHICLE / PROPERTY
INVESTIGATING AGENCY TYPE OF REPORT AGENCY CRASH REPORT NO.YR
1 1 4 4 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 1 1
DRAC
U1 U2
TRFD TRFC WEAT DRVA
U2
VIS
U1 U2
VEHD
U1 U2
LGHT COLL MANV
U1 U2
ILLINOIS TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT Sheet ____of ____Sheets
TRFW
VEHT
U1
U2
# LNS
U1
U2
ALIGN
U1
U2
14
1
1
0
0
1
1
RSUR
VEHU
U1
U2
SPDR
U1
U2
RDEF
BAC
U1
U2
1
2
2
0
0
1
996
996
# OCCS
U1
U2
DIRP
U1
U2
SLMT
U1
U2
2
1
3
1
30
30
Yorkville Police Department 22 22-00670
WESTERN LN YORKVILLE
o
þ
Y
N
HIGH RIDGE LN 2KENDALL
1
F 2 4
O 1 0
IL D 0
99 9
o þ
SEX SAFT AIR
INJ EJCT EPTH
STATE CLASS CDL ID
PEDV PPA PPL
INCIDENTRESPONDER
Y N
IF "Y"
TOYOTA COROLLA 2021
JTDVPMAE8MJ130577
TOYOTA LEASE TRUST J11 8510-D27-13
State Farm o þ
11
F 2 4
O 1 0
IL D 0
99 9
o þ
SEX SAFT AIR
INJ EJCT EPTH
STATE CLASS CDL ID
PEDV PPA PPL
INCIDENTRESPONDER
Y N
IF "Y"
FORD EXPLORER 2021
1FM5K8GC7MGB20272
939294017
Progressive o þ
1 6 F 13 4 O 1 0
oþ
Did crash occur
in a Work Zone?
Y
N
o
þ
If YES check one below:
Construction
Maintenance
Utility
Unknown work zone type
o
o
o
o
Workers present?
Y
N
o
þ
¡
¡
o
þ
þ o
o þ
o þo
þ
DRIVER PARKED DRIVERLESS PED PEDAL EQUES NMV NCV DVþoooooooo
o þ
o þ
o þ
o þ
DRIVER PARKED DRIVERLESS PED PEDAL EQUES NMV NCV DVþoooooooo
o þ
o þ
o þ
o þ
25
UNIT ____
IF MORE THAN ONE CMV IS INVOLVED, USE SR 1050A
ADDITIONAL UNITS FORMS.
A CMV is defined as any motor vehicle used to transport passengers or
property and:
1. Has a weight rating of more than 10,000 pounds (example: truck or
truck/trailer combination): or
2. Is used or designed to transport more than 15 passengers including
the driver (example: shuttle or charter bus): or
3. Is designed to carry 15 or fewer passengers and operated by a
contract carrier transporting employees in the course of their employment
(example:employee transporter -usually a van type vehicle or passenger
car): or
4. Is used or designed to transport between 9 and 15 passengers,
including the driver,for direct compensation (example: large van used
for specific purpose): or
5. Is any vehicle used to transport any hazardous material (HAZMAT) that
requires placarding (example:placards will be displayed on the vehicle).
CARRIER NAME _________________________________________________
ADDRESS _______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
CITY/STATE/ZIP ___________________________________________________
MOTOR CARR. ID
USDOT NO._________________________ILLCC NO.__________________
Interstate Intrastate
Not In Comm./Govt.Not In Comm./Other
Source of above
Side of Truck Papers Driver Log Book
GVWR/GCWR
<10,000 10,000 - 26,000 >26,000
Were HAZMAT placards on vehicle?Yes No
If yes, name on placard _______________________________________
4 digit UN NO.___________________1 digit Hazard Class NO._______
Did HAZMAT Spill from vehicle (do NOT consider FUEL from vehicle's own
tank)?Yes No Unknown
Did HAZMAT Regulations violation contribute to the crash?
Yes No Unknown
Did Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (MCS)violation contribute to
the crash?Yes No Unknown
Was a Driver/Vehicle Examination Report form completed?
HAZMAT Yes No Unknown Out of Service Yes No
MCS Yes No Unknown Out of Service Yes No
Form Number _____________________________________________
IDOT PERMIT NO.________________WIDELOAD?Y N
TRAILER VIN 1 ___________________________________________
TRAILER VIN 2 ___________________________________________
TRAILER WIDTH(S)0 - 96"97 - 102"> 102"
TRAILER 1
TRAILER 2
TRAILER LENGTH(S) 1 __________ ft 2 __________ ft
TOTAL VEHICLE LENGTH __________ ft NO. OF AXLES __________
SELECT CODES FROM BACK OF CRASH BOOKLET
VEHICLE CONFIG. ______CARGO BODY TYPE ______LOAD TYPE ______
NARRATIVE (refer to vehicle by unit #)
LOCAL USE ONLY
A Diagram and Narrative are required on all Type B crashes,
even if units have been moved prior to the officer's arrival.
U1 COLOR
U1 TOWED BY / TO :
U2 COLOR
U2 TOWED BY / TO :
U1 Drug 1 U1 Drug 2 U2 Drug 1 U2 Drug 2
U1 TOWED
DUE TO o DISABLING DAMAGE o NOT DISABLING DAMAGE DAMAGE EXTENT:
U2 TOWED
DUE TO o DISABLING DAMAGE o NOT DISABLING DAMAGE DAMAGE EXTENT:
LARGE TRUCK,BUS,OR HM VEHICLE
UNIT 1 WAS EASTBOUND WESTERN LN AT THE INTERSECTION OF HIGH RIDGE
LN. UNIT 2 WAS NORTHBOUND HIGH RIDGE LN AT THE INTERSECTION OF
WESTERN LN. BOTH VEHICLES TRAVELED THROUGH THE INTERSECTION AT THE
SAME TIME AND THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE BUMPER OF UNIT 1 STRUCK THE
FRONT DRIVER SIDE OF UNIT 2 CAUSING MODERATE DAMAGE.
UNIT 1 ADVISED THEY WERE APPROACHING THE INTERSECTION AND SLOWING
DOWN TO THE YIELD SIGN. UNIT 1 ADVISED THEY DID NOT SEE UNIT 2 AND DID
NOT YIELD TO THEM APPROACHING. UNIT 1 ADVISED THAT AS THEY WENT
THROUGH THE INTERSECTION THEY STRUCK UNIT 2.
UNIT 2 ADVISED THEY WERE NORTHBOUND ON HIGH RIDGE LN WHEN UNIT 1
o o
o o
o o o o
o o o
o o
o o o
o o o
ooo
o o o o o
o o o o o
oo
ooo
o o o
Red Black 000 000
U1 Race:U2 Race:W W
X002608966
26
BEGAN TO GO THROUGH THE INTERSECTION AND ULTIMATELY STRUCK THEIR VEHICLE.
NO INJURIES REPORTED. NO VEHICLES TOWED.
Narrative
27
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Location: High Ridge Lane and Canyon Trail / Canyon Trail Court
Criteria Met Criteria**
Yes
Additional
Study
Required No
A.
B.
C.Minimum Volumes:
1.
2.
3.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Criteria are clearly met recommending installation of a multi-way stop
Criteria are not clearly met at this time - no further action recommended
Criteria may or may not be met - additional engineering study required
By:Gabriel Braboy Date:9/11/2023
Title
By:Date:
Title
* Based upon Professional Engineer's Review** Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.
Based on a preliminary review of the criteria for a multi-way stop sign the following action is recommended:
The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersections from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but
If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major-street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.
Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1 and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values, criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
The need to control left-turn conflicts;
The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes;
Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
MULTI-WAY STOP
Primary Criteria to Consider*
Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi-way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal.
Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
The vehicular volume entering the intersections from the major street approaches (total of both approaches)averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
28
HIGH RIDGE LANE – NORTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING NORTH
HIGH RIDGE LANE – NORTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING EAST
29
HIGH RIDGE LANE – NORTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING WEST
HIGH RIDGE LANE – SOUTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING SOUTH
30
HIGH RIDGE LANE – SOUTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING EAST
HIGH RIDGE LANE – SOUTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING WEST
31
CANYON TRAIL COURT – EASTBOUND APPROACH
LOOKING EAST
CANYON TRAIL COURT – EASTBOUND APPROACH
LOOKING NORTH
32
CANYON TRAIL COURT – EASTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING SOUTH
CANYON TRAIL – WESTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING WEST
33
CANYON TRAIL COURT – WESTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING NORTH
CANYON TRAIL COURT – WESTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING SOUTH
34
35
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING EVALUATION
Location: Northland Lane and Western Lane
Criteria Met Criteria**
Yes
Additional
Study
Required No
A.
B.
C.An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area.
A.
B.
C.
A.Criteria are clearly met recommending installation of a YIELD or STOP sign (Circle designated sign type)
Designate Location: _
B.Criteria are not clearly met at this time - no further action recommended
C.Criteria may or may not be met - additional engineering study required
By:Gabriel Braboy Date:9/11/2023
PROJECT ENGINEERTitle
By:Date:
Title
* Based upon Professional Engineer's Review** Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
Based on a preliminary review of the criteria for a YIELD or STOP sign the following action is recommended:
Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way at the intersection under the normal right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period.
Guidance: Engineering judgement should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors should be considered:A. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches;B. Number and angle of approaches;C. Approach speeds;D. Sight distance available on each approach; andE. Reported crash experience.
I. YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist:
An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law.
The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day;
The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and/or
A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or
II. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local
roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist:
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
TWO WAY YIELD OR STOP
Evaluation Criteria
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
36
NORTHLAND LANE – NORTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING NORTH
NORTHLAND LANE – NORTHBOUND APPROACH LOOKING WEST
37
NORTHLAND LANE – SOUTHBOUND APPROACH
LOOKING SOUTH
NORTHLAND LANE – SOUTHBOUND APPROACH
LOOKING WEST
38
WESTERN LANE – EASTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING EAST
WESTERN LANE – EASTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING NORTH
39
WESTERN LANE – EASTBOUND APPROACH LOOKING SOUTH
40
41
PART II:
TRAFFIC SPEED STUDY
42
Faxon
Western
Alice
NorthlandHigh RidgeBlackberry Shore
Canyon
Iroquois
White
P
l
a
i
n
s
Yellowstone
Canyon Trail
Denise
Copyright nearmap 2015
0 300 600 Feet
7-DAY SPEEDSTUDYLOCATIONS
Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler RoadSugar Grove, Illinois 60554(630)466-6700www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
OCTOBER 2023
YO1107
YO2107-Kylyn Ridge Traffic Collection.mxd
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2021\
MJT ³
SPEED STUDY LOCATION
SPEED STUDY LOCATION
SPEED STUDY LOCATION
43
For Project:High Ridge Lane
Project Notes:
Location/Name:Merged
Report Generated:9/20/2023 8:17:42 AM
Speed Intervals 1 MPH
Time Intervals Instant
Traffic Report From 9/13/2023 6:00:00 PM through 9/20/2023 6:59:59 AM
85th Percentile Speed 34 MPH
85th Percentile Vehicles 2460
Max Speed 65 MPH on 9/16/2023 4:06:48 PM
Total Vehicles 2894
AADT:442
Volumes -
weekly counts
Time 5 Day 7 Day
Average Daily 386 404
AM Peak 7:00 AM 29 25
PM Peak 4:00 PM 45 42
Speed
Speed Limit:30
85th Percentile Speed:34
50th Percentile Speed:29
10 MPH Pace Interval:23.0 MPH to 33.0 MPH
Average Speed:28.82
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
Count over limit 173 168 35 179 203 164 161
% over limit 37.8 39.3 29.4 35.9 41.5 31.4 42.5
Avg Speeder 33.9 34.0 34.1 34.3 34.4 34.8 34.1
Avg Speed 28.9 28.7 28.1 28.7 29.3 28.1 29.6
Class Counts
Number %
VEH_SM 32 1.1
VEH_MED 2781 96.1
VEH_LG 81 2.8
[VEH_SM=motorcycle,VEH_MED = sedan,VEH_LG = truck]
44
Summary of Violators
High Ridge Lane from Wed-Sep-13-2023-06-00-PM to Wed-Sep-20-2023-06-59-AM
Starting Hour Count Average Speed of all Traffic Violator Counts Average Speed of Violators
00:00:00 27 28.6 8 35.6
01:00:00 7 30.6 4 31.5
02:00:00 13 29.3 6 33.3
03:00:00 6 35.3 5 39.4
04:00:00 22 26.7 6 32.3
05:00:00 31 27.0 6 33.0
06:00:00 105 26.4 27 33.9
07:00:00 141 28.9 52 34.3
08:00:00 154 28.0 52 33.6
09:00:00 131 29.0 52 34.3
10:00:00 141 29.4 50 34.4
11:00:00 146 29.7 71 33.6
12:00:00 183 29.2 79 33.9
13:00:00 181 29.2 75 33.5
14:00:00 187 29.3 78 34.8
15:00:00 238 28.7 86 34.4
16:00:00 254 29.6 100 35.1
17:00:00 219 29.1 91 34.1
18:00:00 229 28.5 73 34.5
19:00:00 177 28.6 64 33.7
20:00:00 145 28.0 46 33.9
21:00:00 85 28.7 29 34.4
22:00:00 47 27.0 11 36.5
23:00:00 25 30.9 12 37.0
45
46
For Project:Northland Lane
Project Notes:
Location/Name:Merged
Report Generated:9/27/2023 7:37:38 AM
Speed Intervals 1 MPH
Time Intervals Instant
Traffic Report From 9/20/2023 4:00:00 PM through 9/27/2023 7:59:59 AM
85th Percentile Speed 30 MPH
85th Percentile Vehicles 3210
Max Speed 46 MPH on 9/21/2023 5:16:51 PM
Total Vehicles 3777
AADT:566
Volumes -
weekly counts
Time 5 Day 7 Day
Average Daily 492 521
AM Peak 11:00 AM 32 39
PM Peak 5:00 PM 58 53
Speed
Speed Limit:30
85th Percentile Speed:30
50th Percentile Speed:26
10 MPH Pace Interval:21.0 MPH to 31.0 MPH
Average Speed:25.82
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
Count over limit 61 66 18 67 78 55 56
% over limit 10.3 11.2 7.2 11.7 13.3 8.8 9.9
Avg Speeder 32.5 32.3 34.5 32.5 33.0 33.0 32.4
Avg Speed 25.8 26.1 25.2 26.2 26.4 25.1 25.7
Class Counts
Number %
VEH_SM 2 0.1
VEH_MED 3707 98.1
VEH_LG 68 1.8
[VEH_SM=motorcycle,VEH_MED = sedan,VEH_LG = truck]
47
Summary of Violators
Northland Lane from Wed-Sep-20-2023-04-00-PM to Wed-Sep-27-2023-07-59-AM
Starting Hour Count Average Speed of all Traffic Violator Counts Average Speed of Violators
00:00:00 10 26.7 2 35.5
01:00:00 3 20.7 0 0.0
02:00:00 2 27.5 1 31.0
03:00:00 9 26.4 0 0.0
04:00:00 18 27.3 2 35.5
05:00:00 29 24.3 1 32.0
06:00:00 115 26.1 17 32.1
07:00:00 182 26.9 40 32.3
08:00:00 137 26.3 11 32.4
09:00:00 157 26.3 17 32.1
10:00:00 197 26.2 24 32.3
11:00:00 235 25.8 22 32.2
12:00:00 260 26.4 42 32.8
13:00:00 214 25.9 24 32.6
14:00:00 262 25.5 27 32.6
15:00:00 250 25.6 22 32.0
16:00:00 356 26.1 35 32.5
17:00:00 373 25.8 38 33.1
18:00:00 339 25.4 29 33.1
19:00:00 249 25.2 19 33.4
20:00:00 182 24.8 11 33.8
21:00:00 112 25.4 10 34.4
22:00:00 63 25.3 5 34.4
23:00:00 23 25.5 2 35.5
48
49
For Project:Blackberry Shore Ln
Project Notes:
Location/Name:Merged
Report Generated:10/4/2023 3:25:52 PM
Speed Intervals 1 MPH
Time Intervals Instant
Traffic Report From 9/27/2023 4:00:00 PM through 10/4/2023 2:59:59 PM
85th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
85th Percentile Vehicles 6485
Max Speed 59 MPH on 10/2/2023 7:13:12 AM
Total Vehicles 7629
AADT:1096
Volumes -
weekly counts
Time 5 Day 7 Day
Average Daily 1035 1023
AM Peak 7:00 AM 69 61
PM Peak 5:00 PM 105 97
Speed
Speed Limit:30
85th Percentile Speed:36
50th Percentile Speed:31
10 MPH Pace Interval:26.0 MPH to 36.0 MPH
Average Speed:30.55
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
Count over limit 560 525 504 713 657 569 502
% over limit 52.5 48.4 53.9 55.3 51.8 51.7 56.8
Avg Speeder 34.7 34.8 34.3 34.8 34.6 34.4 34.8
Avg Speed 30.5 30.2 30.7 30.9 30.4 30.3 31.1
Class Counts
Number %
VEH_SM 547 7.2
VEH_MED 6816 89.3
VEH_LG 266 3.5
[VEH_SM=motorcycle,VEH_MED = sedan,VEH_LG = truck]
50
Summary of Violators
Blackberry Shore Ln from Wed-Sep-27-2023-04-00-PM to Wed-Oct-04-2023-02-59-PM
Starting Hour Count Average Speed of all Traffic Violator Counts Average Speed of Violators
00:00:00 69 30.9 39 34.2
01:00:00 21 32.0 14 34.6
02:00:00 8 29.3 3 33.0
03:00:00 16 30.9 10 35.0
04:00:00 46 30.3 26 34.4
05:00:00 81 30.4 45 34.5
06:00:00 234 30.0 113 35.2
07:00:00 405 30.7 211 34.8
08:00:00 397 30.0 200 34.4
09:00:00 350 30.2 170 34.5
10:00:00 432 30.7 226 34.7
11:00:00 426 30.2 218 34.9
12:00:00 500 30.9 287 34.8
13:00:00 406 30.6 214 34.9
14:00:00 447 31.4 263 35.3
15:00:00 551 30.9 301 34.8
16:00:00 623 31.1 364 34.6
17:00:00 683 30.9 366 34.8
18:00:00 562 30.0 291 34.2
19:00:00 473 29.7 226 33.6
20:00:00 369 29.9 168 34.5
21:00:00 245 30.5 118 34.7
22:00:00 173 30.3 91 34.4
23:00:00 112 31.3 66 34.7
51
52
TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX
United City of Yorkville
Kendall County, Illinois
November, 2015
PREPARED BY:
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Introduction
TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLBOX
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
This traffic calming toolbox is designed to be a reference for some of the more common and applicable
traffic calming measures. This is not a complete listing of all possible traffic calming measures. Cost
information was obtained during research and is for use in planning. Project construction costs can be
highly variable depending on size, scope, and complexity of the project.
VERTICAL DEFLECTIONHORIZONTAL DEFLECTIONCONSTRICTIONFULL CLOSURE SPEED HUMPS ROUNDABOUTSCURB EXTENSIONSON-STREET PARKINGSIGNALSPARTIAL CLOSURE SPEED TABLESMINI ROUNDABOUTS/ TRAFFIC CIRCLESNECK-DOWNS/ BULB-OUTSBICYCLE LANESPEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACONSFORCED TURN ISLANDS (DIVERTERS)RAISED CROSSWALKSCHICANESCHOKERS/ MID-BLOCK CROSSINGSNARROWED LANESRAPID FLASH BEACONSMEDIAN BARRIERS (DIVERTERS)RAISED INTERSECTIONSALTERNATE SIDE PARKINGSLOW POINTSMARKED CROSSWALKSACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN SIGNALSDIVERTERS SPEED CUSIONSREALIGNED INTERSECTIONGATEWAYSTRANSVERSE LANE MARKINGSPEDESTRIAN COUNTDOWN TIMERSSIGNED TURN RESTRICTIONSSPEED BUMPSPEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLANDSRUMBLE STRIPSLEADING PEDESTRIAN INTERVALSCENTER ISLAND MEDIANSRUMBLE STRIPES LAGGING LEFT TURNSCURB RADIUS REDUCTIONCOLORED PAVEMENTTEXTURED PAVEMENTTEXTURED MARKINGSSPEED GUN WITH VMSSPECIAL SIGNSTRAFFIC CALMING MEASURESPASSIVE MEASURESACTIVE MEASURESVOLUME CONTROL MEASURESSIGNALIZATIONSPEED CONTROL MEASURES
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Horizontal Deflection: Chicanes
CHICANES AND ALTERNATING-SIDE PARKING
A chicane is a series of narrowings or curb extensions that alternate from one side of the street to the
other forming S-shaped curves.1
Chicanes are used at midblock locations lower volume streets.1
Alternating-side parking (on-street) can also be used to create a chicane.4
Typical Cost: $7,000 ‐ $15,000 (Chicanes)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Constriction: Curb Extensions
CURB EXTENSIONS
Curb extensions visually and physically narrow the roadway, creating safer and shorter crossings for
pedestrians while increasing the available space for street furniture, benches, plantings, and street trees.
Curb extensions have multiple applications, ranging from neckdowns/bulbouts, to chokers/mid-block
crossings, to chicanes (discussed on another page), to one-lane slow points.3
Neckdowns or bulbouts are curb extensions at intersection corners that narrow a street by extending
the sidewalk or widening the planting strip.1
Chokers or midblock crossings are curb extensions at midblock that narrow a street by extending the
sidewalk or widening the planting strip.1
One-lane slow points are curb extensions that narrow a street by widening the sidewalks or planting
strips, effectively creating a pinch point along the street. They can be created by bringing both curbs in, or
they can be done by widening one side at a midblock location.6
Curb extensions of all kinds may be implemented on downtown, neighborhood, and residential streets,
large and small.3
Typical Cost: $10,000 ‐ $20,000 (Neckdowns – per corner)
$7,000 ‐ $15,000 (Chokers)
$7,000 ‐ $20,000 (One‐Lane Slow Points)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Constriction: Curb Radius Reduction
CURB RADIUS REDUCTIONS
Curb radius reductions are reconstructions of the turning radius on one or more legs of an intersection
to a tighter turn(s).
These shorten the crossing distance for pedestrians, slow the motorists down, and improve sight distance
between pedestrians and motorists.
Typical Cost: $5,500 ‐ $6,500 (per leg)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Volume Control: Diverters
DIVERTERS
A diverter is an island built at a residential street intersection that prevents certain through and/or turning
movements. There are different types of diverters: diagonal, star, forced turn, and truncated.
Diverters affect people living in the neighborhood most of all and must be carefully considered. They are
mainly used to discourage or prevent traffic from cutting through a neighborhood.9
Typical Cost: $5,000 ‐ $85,000 (Per intersection depending on type and
complexity of diverter)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Volume Control: Full‐street closures
FULL-STREET CLOSURES
Full-street closures are barriers placed across a street to completely close the street to though-traffic,
usually leaving only sidewalks open; they are sometimes called cul-de-sacs or dead-ends.
Full-street closures are typically applied only after other measures have failed or been determined to be
inappropriate.1
Typical Cost: $500 ‐ $125,000 (Depending on type and complexity of
system used)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Constriction: Gateways
GATEWAYS
Gateways are physical or geometric landmarks that indicate a change in environment from a higher
speed arterial or collector road to a lower speed residential or commercial district. They may be a
combination of street narrowing, medians, signing, archways, roundabouts, or other identifiable feature.
Signing and archways will be shown here. Other means are discussed in other parts of this toolbox.
Typical Cost: $150 ‐ $500 (Gateway Signs)
$5,000 ‐ $50,000 (Gateway Structures)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Volume Control: Partial‐street closures
PARTIAL-STREET CLOSURES
Partial-street closures are barriers that block travel in one direction for a short distance on otherwise
two-way streets and are sometimes called half-closures, entrance barriers, or one-way closures.
Generally, provisions are made to make these closures passable for pedestrians and cyclists.1
Typical Cost: $500 ‐ $45,000 (Depending on type and complexity of system
used)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Passive Measures: Pavement Markings
PAVEMENT MARKINGS
Pavement markings are used to define traveled lanes for motorists and pedestrians. Pavement
markings may be used to reduce lane widths, delineate parking lanes and/or bicycle lanes, delineate
areas restricted to motor travel or parking, and delineate cross walks for pedestrian travel.
Roadway narrowing by use of edge lines, bicycle lanes, and parking lanes is an effective way to reduce
speed by about 1 to 3 mph. Transverse pavement markings, if they are raised, can help to slow traffic in
areas such as school zones. These markings, when driven over, produce noise and vibration that alerts
the driver. They are less effective and less costly than installing rumble strips.
Typical Cost: $2 ‐ $10 (Per linear foot of pavement marking)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Passive Measures: Paving Treatments
PAVING TREATMENTS
Paving treatments are colors or textures of pavement (or pavement marking) used to provide warning to
drivers or to delineate pedestrian or bicycle lanes. Colored pavement either by design or pavement
marking visually enhances the function of portions of the roadway, such as a colored bicycle lane.
Colored pavement marking can also be used to delineate areas of lower speed.
Textured pavement can alert the driver to a change in function or speed of the roadway visually and
through noise and vibration as they drive over it. For instance, cross walks made of stamped concrete or
pavers visually stand out as well as are noisy to cross. Rumble strips can be made of raised reflective
pavement markers, raised plastic, or milled into the pavement. These cause noise and vibration to alert
the driver.
Typical Cost: $2 ‐ $10 (Per linear foot of pavement marking)
$0.25 ‐ $2.00 per linear foot (Rumble strips)
$75 ‐ $200 per square yard (Textured pavement)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Constriction: Pedestrian Refuge Islands
MEDIAN/PEDESTRIAN REFUGE ISLANDS
Median/Pedestrian refuge islands are raised islands placed in the center of the street at intersections or
midblock crossings to help protect crossing pedestrians and cyclists from motor vehicles.
These are particularly helpful on wider streets to allow pedestrians to focus on traffic from one direction at
a time while crossing a street. They are most useful on high-volume, high-speed roads.
Typical Cost: $2,000 ‐ $40,000 (Per intervention)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Vertical Deflection: Raised Crosswalks and Intersections
RAISED CROSSWALKS and RAISED
INTERSECTIONS
A raised crosswalk is a speed table outfitted with crosswalk markings and signage to channelize
pedestrian crossings, providing pedestrians with a level street crossing. This also makes pedestrians
more visible to approaching motorists.
Raised crosswalks are good for locations where pedestrian crossings occur at haphazard locations and
vehicle speeds are excessive.4
A raised intersection is a flat raised area covering an entire intersection with ramps on all approaches
and often with brick or other textured materials on the flat section and ramps.
Raised intersections are often used in densely developed urban areas where loss of parking would be
unacceptable.1
Typical Cost: $4,000 ‐ $10,000 (Raised Crosswalks)
$15,000 ‐ $60,000 (Raised Intersections)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Horizontal Deflection: Roundabouts and Traffic Circles
ROUNDABOUTS and TRAFFIC CIRCLES
A roundabout is a type of circular intersection in which traffic travels counterclockwise (in right-hand
traffic counties) around a central island. Specific design and traffic control features define and distinguish
roundabouts from traffic circles. These include yield control of all entering traffic, channelized approaches
that deflect traffic flow and appropriate geometric curvature to ensure that travel speeds on the circulatory
roadway are typically less than 30 mph.5
Roundabouts are used on higher volume streets than traffic circles.4
A traffic circle is a raised island, placed in an intersection, around which traffic circulates. They are
usually 10’ – 20’ in diameter6 and require drivers to slow to a speed that allows them to comfortably
maneuver around them.1 These are smaller than roundabouts and do not have yield control of all entering
traffic.
Traffic circles are mainly used on intersections of local or collector streets.1
Typical Cost: $60,000 ‐ $300,000 (Roundabouts)
$10,000 ‐ $50,000 (Traffic Circles)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Vertical Deflection: Speed Bumps and Speed Cushions
SPEED BUMPS and SPEED CUSHIONS
A speed bump is a low raised ridge across a road or parking lot that causes people to drive more slowly.2
Speed bumps are typically used in parking lots or very low volume roads.
A speed cushion is a speed bump, hump, or speed table that includes wheel cutouts to allow large
vehicles to pass unaffected while reducing passenger car speeds.
Speed cushions allow emergency vehicles to pass their wheels on either side of the raised area. They
also allow cyclists to pass on the side of the raised area.3
Typical Cost: $1,500 ‐ $2,500 (Speed Bumps)
$3,000 ‐ $5,000 (Speed Cushions – per set of 3)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Vertical Deflection: Speed Humps and Speed Tables
SPEED HUMPS and SPEED TABLES
A speed hump is a rounded raised area of pavement typically 12 to 14 feet in length. They are often
placed in a series (typically spaced 300 to 600 feet apart). They are sometimes called road humps or
undulations.
Speed humps are typically used on residential streets, but not major roads, bus routes, or primary
emergency response routes. They are placed at mid-block, not at intersections.
A speed table is a speed hump that has a flat middle section that is typically 22 feet in length and ramps
on the ends that are typically 6 feet in length (see bottom right picture).
Speed tables are mainly used on local and collector streets or on main roads through small communities.1
Typical Cost: $1,500 ‐ $3,000 (Speed Humps)
$2,500 ‐ $5,000 (Speed Tables)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox Signalization: Traffic and Pedestrian Signals
TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS
Traffic signals generally create gaps in the traffic flow and allow pedestrians to cross the street at
locations where pedestrians would otherwise experience excessive delay, difficulties crossing, or safety
issues. Signal timings can be adjusted for lagging left turns and/or leading pedestrian intervals.
There are many enhancements to the standard traffic signals that further advance the safety of the
pedestrians. The most common is the pedestrian-activated signal (the push button seen below), which
can also be made an accessible pedestrian signal. Further refinements to that include a pedestrian
countdown timer (seen in bottom photo) and pedestrian detector signals. Detectors can also be used to
extend the crossing time for slower moving pedestrians (called a PUFFIN crossing).
Rapid flash beacons (sign-mounted) and pedestrian hybrid beacons (pole mounted – see top right
photo below) are also used to alert drivers to upcoming pedestrian crossings. These are less costly but
also more passive than traditional signals, which actually stop traffic.
Typical Cost: $150,000 ‐ $500,000 (New signals and installation)
$300 ‐ $15,000 (Signal enhancements – per enhancement)
$10,000 ‐ $60,000 (Rapid‐flash & pedestrian hybrid beacons)
United City of Yorkville Traffic Calming Toolbox References
REFERENCES
1 Institute of Transportation Engineers (2015). ITE Traffic Calming website (www.ite.org/traffic/)
2 Merriam-Webster Dictionary
3 National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) (2015). NACTO website
(www.nacto.org)
4 Fehr & Peers (2015). Traffic Calming website (www.trafficcalming.org)
5 Illinois Department of Transportation (2015). Bureau of Design and Environment (BDE) Manual
(www.dot.il.gov)
6 City of Alameda (1996). Traffic Calming Toolbox
7 Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center (2015). Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center
website (www.pedbikeinfo.org)
8 Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center (2015). Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure
Selection System (www.pedbikesafe.org/pedsafe/countermeasures.cfm)
9 Project for Public Spaces (2015). Traffic Calming 101 (www.pps.org/reference/livememtraffic/)