Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Economic Development Packet 2025 06-03-25
AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, June 3, 2025 6:00 p.m. East Conference Room #337 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Yorkville, IL Citizen Comments: Minutes for Correction/Approval: 1. April 1, 2025 – Special 2. May 6, 2025 New Business: 1. EDC 2025-36 Building Permit Reports for March and April 2025 2. EDC 2025-37 Building Inspection Reports for March and April 2025 3. EDC 2025-38 Property Maintenance Reports for March and April 2025 4. EDC 2025-39 Economic Development Reports for April and May 2025 5. EDC 2025-40 Project Steel – Prologis (Data Center) – Annexation, Rezone, Preliminary PUD Plan, and PUD 6. EDC 2025-41 Project Cardinal – Pioneer (Data Center) – Annexation, Rezone, Preliminary PUD Plan, and PUD 7. EDC 2025-42 Data Center Development Standards – Text Amendment 8. EDC 2025-43 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Text Amendment 9. EDC 2025-44 Kendall County Petition 25-04 – 1.5 Mile Review (Gorman and Zepelak) 10. EDC 2025-45 Ordinance Approving a License Agreement By and Between the United City of Yorkville and TPE IL KE105, LLC Old Business: Additional Business: United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 www.yorkville.il.us UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, June 3, 2025 6:00 PM EAST CONFERENCE ROOM #337 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. April 1, 2025 – Special □ Approved __________ □ As presented □ With corrections --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. May 6, 2025 □ Approved __________ □ As presented □ With corrections --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2025-36 Building Permit Reports for March and April 2025 □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. EDC 2025-37 Building Inspection Reports for March and April 2025 □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. EDC 2025-38 Property Maintenance Reports for March and April 2025 □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. EDC 2025-39 Economic Development Reports for April and May 2025 □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. EDC 2025-40 Project Steel – Prologis (Data Center) – Annexation, Rezone, Preliminary PUD Plan, and PUD □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. EDC 2025-41 Project Cardinal – Pioneer (Data Center) – Annexation, Rezone, Preliminary PUD Plan, and PUD □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. EDC 2025-42 Data Center Development Standards – Text Amendment □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. EDC 2025-43 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Text Amendment □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. EDC 2025-44 Kendall County Petition 25-04 – 1.5 Mile Review (Gorman and Zepelak) □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. EDC 2025-45 Ordinance Approving a License Agreement By and Between the United City of Yorkville and TPE IL KE105, LLC □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Purchasing Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Minutes Tracking Number Minutes of the Special Economic Development Committee – April 1, 2025 Economic Development Committee – June 3, 2025 Majority Committee Approval Minute Taker Name Department DRAFT Page 1 of 3 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE SPECIAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, April 1, 2025, 6:00pm East Conference Room #337 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Yorkville, IL In Attendance: Committee Members Chairman Joe Plocher Alderman Chris Funkhouser Alderman Dan Transier Absent: Alderman Seaver Tarulis Other City Officials City Administrator Bart Olson Community Development Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble Planner I Sara Mendez Senior Planner David Hansen Code Official Pete Ratos Community Engagement & Marketing Coordinator Katelyn Gregory Other Guests Charlie Tarwater, QuickTrip Mike Holzer, Brenda Holzer Foundation Jen Rakas via Zoom The meeting was called to order at 6:00pm by Chairman Joe Plocher. Citizen Comments None Minutes for Correction/Approval March 4, 2025 The minutes were approved as presented. New Business (Items #5 and #6 were moved forward on the agenda) 5. EDC 2025-27 Quik Trip – Sign Variance Charlie Tarwater, Real Estate Manager with QuikTrip was present and gave a short overview of the sign variance request. He said a sign had been approved in 2023 as a Special Use and it was 7'10” and 54 square feet. It met the sign ordinance at that time. Since that time, an additional product with pricing has been added to the QuikTrip product lineup and adds 5” to the sign for 62 square feet. He said shrubs and landscaping would be used to screen the sign base. He compared sign sizes with other gas stations in the city which are larger than this request. Page 2 of 3 Alderman Funkhouser said he does not approve of a larger sign and that requirements were recently revised through the UDO process, however, he acknowledged the competitive factor. Alderman Transier had no objections and asked for a new draft of the sign showing premium materials. The materials for the base and possible heights and sign size were discussed and it was noted that with premium materials (such as brick and stone), a larger or taller sign could be allowed. David Hansen said staff supports the request due to nearby signs being larger. With committee approval, this moves to Public Hearing at PZC on April 9 and then to City Council. 6. EDC 2025-28 904 S. Bridge Street - Variance Ms. Mendez presented the background for this variance request from Mr. Mike Holzer to construct an office building for his non-profit organization. His request is to reduce the front-yard setback from 50 feet to 42 feet. The building would be situated on a lot on S. Bridge St. (Rt. 47). He has a limited space with the lot configuration and small size, but is meeting other setbacks and number of parking stalls. Nearby properties also have reduced setbacks. Alderman Funkhouser asked the purpose of the drive-through lane around the building and Mr. Holzer replied it was for weed control and ease in making an exit from the parking lot. This will also be addressed later said Mr. Ratos. He also noted that the Fire Department would require access behind the building. The committee supported this request and this petition is scheduled for a Public Hearing at PZC April 9th. (return to regular agenda order) 1. EDC 2025-23 Building Permit Report for February 2025 Mr. Ratos reported one single family detached permit, 14 commercial and 31 miscellaneous for the month. 2. EDC 2025-24 Building Inspection Report for February 2025 There were 256 inspections in February, said Mr. Ratos. 3. EDC 2025-25 Property Maintenance Report for February 2025 There were no hearings in February, but a couple complaints were addressed. He noted a trash dumping issue that they are investigating. 4. EDC 2025-26 Economic Development Report for March 2025 Katelyn Gregory reported on new business openings and a new venue--Blank SL8. They have a space for special events and they also want to promote supporting other small businesses in the city. Old Business: None Additional Business: Mr. Ratos gave a brief report on the status of Gerber Glass and the sewer issues concerning the project. He had spoken with Mr. Verne Henne and informed him there were dips and valleys in the sewer that would need to be corrected. Mr. Ratos said Gerber Glass may ask for some money to be refunded if they needed to do the repairs. He said that Gerber may have decided it is more financially prudent to work with Mr. Page 3 of 3 Henne rather than boring along Rt. 47, in order to move forward with this project. Alderman Funkhouser asked about the construction fence and screening that is in disrepair at the Gerber site. Mr. Ratos has spoken with them to rectify the situation. In another matter, Alderman Funkhouser said he noticed work being done at Whispering Meadows and that no Final Plat has been done to allow the work. Mr. Ratos will address this with the construction company following this meeting. There was no further business and the meeting adjourned at 6:21pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Purchasing Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Minutes Tracking Number Minutes of the Economic Development Committee – May 6, 2025 Economic Development Committee – June 3, 2025 Majority Committee Approval Minute Taker Name Department DRAFT Page 1 of 5 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 6, 2025, 6:00pm East Conference Room, #337 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Yorkville, IL In Attendance: Committee Members Vice-Chairman Chris Funkhouser Alderman Dan Transier Absent: Alderman Seaver Tarulis, Alderman Joe Plocher Other City Officials City Administrator Bart Olson Assistant City Administrator Erin Willrett Community Development Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble Alderman Ken Koch Senior Planner David Hansen Planner 1 Sara Mendez City Consultant Lynn Dubajic Kellogg Katelyn Gregory, Economic Development Coordinator Other Guests Keith Landovitz Dale Konicek Kitty Moore Emily Anderson, Legacy Farms Ryan Anderson, Legacy Farms Bernie Weiler, Mickey, Wilson Dave Silverman, Mahoney, Silverman & Cross Matt McCarron, Pioneer Development Michael Konicek Michael Ball, Curran Contracting David Bossy, Mid-America Development John Bryan, Geneva Construction/Legacy Farms Kim Kaskel M. Gilbert Brett Stauffacher, Local 150 Via Zoom: Jen Rakas, Brad Sanderson, Katie Fraser, Sean R., Matt Gilbert, Anonymous The meeting was called to order at 6:03pm by Vice-Chairman Chris Funkhouser and he stated there was no quorum. Mr. Olson explained since only 2 of the 4 committee members were present, no votes or final action would be taken. He said the meeting would move forward with his presentation about data centers and the one for Cardinal Development, along with citizen comments and questions. Mr. Bernie Weiler said he represents some of the neighbors near the new development. He said when a public meeting is called to order with no quorum, the only action you can take is to adjourn the meeting. He said discussion of public business is a violation of the Open Meetings Act. Mr. Olson said he had cleared this action with the city attorney and said all discussion would be informational. Mr. Olson said he would be directing his comments about the properties to the west since many of the attendees present were represented by Mr. Weiler. Page 2 of 5 Presentation by Mr. Olson Overview: Mr. Olson provided a Power Point presentation with general information about the proposed data centers in Yorkville. They provide data storage, computing capacity and are needed for artificial intelligence and they appear as network racks with server space. He said several data center projects have already been approved. Yorkville has been chosen due to access to power generation, thousands of available acres and the ComEd substation can be expanded easily. Soo Farm wind farm has a terminus near Eldamain Rd. which serves as a giant electric line from wind farms in Iowa and terminates in Illinois into the substations. Data centers are an ideal land use, generate minimal noise and pollution, they do not generate children for the schools and they produce large amounts of tax revenue which helps the schools and tax base. Illinois also has incentive programs. They generate a low number of jobs, but they are higher paying. Specifics: There are 3,000 acres of properties interested in data centers. He pointed out where each proposed or approved data center project is located. Eldamain Rd. is the boundary between Yorkville and Plano, but the school districts have different boundaries. Some of the projects are in portions of the 2 districts and tax revenue will be divided. Tax Revenues: Electrical utility tax is paid by all on electric bills, including data centers. Mr. Olson shared figures of the substantial estimated tax that will be paid by Cyrus 1. He estimated $500,000 to $1 million per building. He said the current amount of revenue Yorkville receives from electrical utility tax is $750,000. Data centers also pay property taxes at the same rate as other properties. Mr. Olson explained that while personal property taxes cannot be eliminated, they could be reduced based on taxes received from the data centers or other taxes could be reduced. Mr. Olson said that developers indicate only 1 or 2 buildings will be built at a time with a buildout time of 10-20 years. Resident Concerns Mr. Olson said staff reached out to other agencies and to the biggest data center in the U.S. in Virginia with 300 buildings. The main issues were: power deficit, noise and new power lines. He said staff spoke with ComEd about power due to the potential of 3,000 acres of data center needs. ComEd is conducting some studies on usage and said capacity corridors are likely sufficient without new power lines. He said the city can't reject a land use decision if they are unsure about power capacity. Administrator Olson also noted that Soundscape has been engaged to study the noise issues, attend review meetings, determine placement of equipment for noise abatement, site recommendations and ongoing monitoring etc. The city does have a comprehensive noise ordinance and he explained the allowable decibels. Tonal (constant hum) noises can incur a penalty. The ordinance is also applicable to residents who may reside outside city limits. He said there are some limits and exemptions during construction. Landscape buffers and berms will be used to mitigate noise. Water Usage: The city has not allowed water cooled data centers for heat dissipation, only air- cooled systems. A recent newspaper article mentioned Minooka's water usage of 1 million gallons per day for their data center. Mr. Olson noted that Yorkville's entire use in a day is 2 million gallons. The capacity coming from Lake Michigan will be between 5 million and 8 million gallons per day and that water is expected in 2028. He said data centers will use less water than a subdivision. Page 3 of 5 Construction Phasing: Building will start from west to east, away from residences. The cost of infrastructure improvements is paid by the developer upfront. This removes the risk from residents. Projects must finish a roadway for use during construction prior to building and electrical system upgrades must also be completed upfront. Conclusion: Mr. Olson noted that all projects are listed on the city website and he provided upcoming meeting dates and ways in which opinions can be voiced. A meeting attendee asked that any variances being requested by developers be included in a future presentation. Vice-Chairman Funkhouser opened the floor for questions and comments. Public Comment: David Bossy: He asked if there is any new info about the water being extended from Lake Michigan. Mr. Olson replied the bid package is being bid out by the DuPage Water Commission and the city has a $140 million WIFIA federal loan and $20 million of state loans. He noted that the DWC is also looking into their own intake connection to Lake Michigan. A comprehensive financing package and water rates will be discussed. Ryan Anderson: He asked when attendees would have gotten notice of this meeting since he found out at the last minute. Mr. Olson replied that no notice is required by the state for committee meetings, however, for Public Hearings, anyone within 500 feet of the site, would get a notice for the Planning and Zoning meeting. A notice is published in the newspaper for City Council meetings. The property will also be posted with a sign for the Public Hearing. John Bryan: He said as a contractor he doubts the water will be coming in 2028 and more likely in 2029. He finds it shocking that Yorkville will be spending all this money to bring water from Lake Michigan and there is already a shortage of water and then these projects get approved. He noted that the area north of Galena Rd. was zoned differently in 2007 when it was slated to become a Del Webb community. It did not come to fruition due to the recession. Keith Landovitz: He and wife live on Ashe Rd. west of the project. He spoke of mitigations and said he is not in a subdivision, but in residential area. He commended all the work the city has done for this project in setting up standards for data center projects and he urged the city to do more of the planning and design upfront. He briefly discussed Comprehensive Plans in place for nearby municipalities in 2018. He believes the area north of Galena is transitional and should be treated with more care regarding eco-systems and people living in the area, regardless if they are incorporated, should be included in the thought process. He disapproves of building from west to east and feels the unincorporated areas are treated differently than the citizens. He thinks it is more equitable to build from the center out. Mr. Olson responded and said all amendments to the code are incorporated into Projects Cardinal and Steel and are a result of previous projects where there were no standards in place. This concluded most public comment. Mr. Funkhouser noted that the other agenda items will not be discussed. Introductions of all meeting attendees and committee members were made. Developer Project Overview: Mr. Silverman, representing, Pioneer Development, said they will hold a meeting with surrounding community members. He gave a presentation and told about Pioneer which is a development company that entitles land for data center end users. Mr. McCarron will be instrumental in helping secure end users. ComEd approval must be received along with knowledge there is ample power to the area. ComEd will require developers to make infrastructure improvements to support electricity to the area. Page 4 of 5 Mr. Silverman said this project is on 1,037 acres and there are 305 +/- parcels to the west not annexed to the city. Pioneer Development wishes to do so with M-2 zoning and a PUD. They are requesting deviations from the ordinance similar to that of Cyrus 1. They will have 7 storm water basins and 6 water tanks south of Galena that perhaps the city can use as well. Berms will be in place to minimize impact on residential areas and there will be secure gates in place. There are 14 phases of development and buildings will be built as needed, not on a spec basis. There is 17 million sq. ft. possible providing many construction jobs and high paying jobs when finished. The water impact is being studied and nearly waterless cooling centers are desired. They are working with city staff on an Annexation Agreement, PUD and utility coordination. He noted this property would have been developed into1,600 homes previously. A great amount of tax revenue will be received. Krysti Barksdale-Noble Comments: She noted the petitioner is requesting annexation of 305 acres of unincorporated land, rezoning and a Preliminary Plan. The current residential zoning would be requested to be M-2 zoning. To permit the PUD land use, there is a requirement the developers have to meet at least 1 modification standard and provide benefit to the city. The Petitioner has identified 2 which meet city standards and demonstrate a greater benefit to the regional utility improvements and funding or construction of public roads. PUD Plan: The developer will do 14 phases--1 stormwater and 1 building per phase and the builder anticipates a 10 year buildout. Thirteen deviations/variances have been identified. They include internal building setbacks, permitted uses and a lock that is not subject to any further regulations for 10 years. Also, maximum building height of 70 feet inclusive of rooftop mechanical, when within 1,500 feet of residences, reduction in parking spaces, EV charging station reductions for a “fee in lieu of”. The petitioner is also requesting relief from vehicle access, relief from pedestrian circulation—they will provide a 10 foot wide walking path, reduction to one off street loading space per building. Some deviations are being requested for the parking area and staff is OK with that. Petitioner is seeking deviations from landscaping being requested in parking area which staff approves. A transition buffer 100 feet wide will surround the data center campus. Staff requests an 8 foot berm regardless of incorporation status. Mechanical Screening was also discussed as well as mitigation for backup generators and chillers. Petitioner will work with the sound engineer. Deviations were requested for all lots fronting on the roadway. Appearance Standards: Developer was asked to revise building elevations for a different look and architectural interest, dynamic color palette, visual interest. Staff is looking for highest aesthetic standards for visible portions of building. Street Designs: The UDO has standards for street designs which only apply to public dedicated roadways. The internal roads will not be dedicated and staff is OK with this deviation. Fencing: the Petitioner requested to install a 10 foot tall fence, while the ordinance usually allows an 8 foot fence. Staff supports. Additional recommendations: Staff asked for traffic management during construction, noise studies for pre-construction, during construction, at full buildout and annually. Hours and days for operational testing were presented. Testing of generators takes 2 minutes each. Emergency operations plans and procedures were requested and the petitioner will allow the fire department and police department to conduct a drill prior to occupancy to learn building layout. Contact info will be provided and given to KenCom. Page 5 of 5 The Comprehensive Plan was done in 2016. Ms. Emily Anderson asked if the rural aesthetic would be removed from the plan. Ms. Noble said the aesthetic would not be removed. Mr. Weiler asked if the 100 foot buffer includes detention, which it could. Ms. Noble said the second component with the PUD is the development agreement. It will be a separate agreement and addresses infrastructure funding. Community Meeting Requirement: The city encourages the developer to reach out to the public due to the scale and intensity of the projects. They should meet with nearby developments, residential and businesses and the meeting should occur before the June 11 PZC meeting and the June 10 annexation hearing at City Council. Other Comments: Mr. Bryan asked for clarification on Cyrus 1 and also asked about other roads- -Galena, Baseline, etc. near Project Steel. Ms. Noble said the city engineer has done a review and any road that the development touches will need to be brought to city standards. The entrance locations are still up for discussion. Mr. Bryan also asked when the noise study will be done. Mr. Olson provided the various times and he said a noise study done now will be different than when Rt. 47 is improved. A baseline will be established and the noise cannot exceed the code levels of 50-60 decibels. Mr. Bryan asked about the penalty. There would be fees and possibly the court system. Enforcement would come through work stoppages. Ms. Anderson asked that a health study with tonal levels be done. Ms. Noble said the sound engineer has already done studies on tonal noise and an explanation of tonal effects and preliminary responses will be provided. Alderman Koch asked if the land will be farmed until construction and if utilities will be buried. The farming will continue and ComEd will decide if lines are buried. Alderman Funkhouser had several comments. He was not in favor of the zero feet setbacks, saying that all sides are front yards. Ms. Noble noted there is a 500 foot building separation from residential. Regarding landscaping, he said plantings should be encouraged for the interior to help with mitigation for heat, noise and aesthetics. He also said he would like to see an undulating berm rather than a straight one. He would also like ground screening for buildings and said that louvered masonry panels reduce sound. Ms. Noble indicated that staff recommends mechanical equipment be enclosed by solid barriers. Acreage outside of the fences may be used for prairie plantings, said Mr. McCarron. Next Steps: June 10: Public Hearing at City Council for annexation, June 11: Public Hearing at PZC, notices will be sent There was no further business and the meeting adjourned at 8:08 pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Purchasing Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #1 Tracking Number EDC 2025-36 Building Permit Reports for March and April 2025 Economic Development Committee – June 3, 2025 Informational None All permits issued in March and April 2025. Gina Nelson Community Development Name Department Prepared by D Weinert UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUILDING PERMIT REPORT March 2025 Number of Permits Issued SFD Single Family Dwelling SFA Single Family Attached Multi- Family Apartments Condominiums Commercial Includes all Permits Issued for Commercial Use Industrial Misc. Construction Cost Permit Fees March 2025 84 16 9 0 15 0 44 5,157,248 184,663.92 Calendar Year 2025 199 24 19 0 42 0 114 19,738,844 441,898.97 Fiscal Year 2025 1219 133 25 48 units 1 permit 140 0 920 67,067,973 2,483,308,73 March 2024 133 31 0 0 16 0 86 14,622,166.00 337,363.41 Calendar Year 2024 271 66 0 0 28 0 177 86,525,011.00 873,878.01 Fiscal Year 2024 2094 246 109 0 88 0 1651 168,935,067.00 5,213,074.97 March 2023 163 44 16 0 16 0 87 11,152,981.00 451,376.95 Calendar Year 2023 308 78 34 0 25 0 171 20,825,320.00 990,450.19 Fiscal Year 2023 1413 188 137 0 102 0 986 68,673,016.00 3,291,592.37 March 2022 151 28 0 0 15 0 108 8,952,504.00 214,559.97 Calendar Year 2022 262 47 8 0 27 0 180 14,837,093.00 365,760.77 Fiscal Year 2022 1380 197 144 0 102 0 937 66,356,470.00 2,288,793.66 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUILDING PERMIT REPORT April 2025 TYPES OF PERMITS Number of Permits Issued SFD Single Family Detached SFA Single Family Attached Multi- Family Apartments Condominiums Commercial Includes all Permits Issued for Commercial Use Industrial Misc. Construction Cost Permit Fees April 2025 153 10 9 0 12 0 122 54,790,514.00 224,939.78 Calendar Year 2025 361 34 36 0 54 0 237 75,425,158.00 784,749.39 Fiscal Year 2025 1381 143 42 1 permit 48 units 152 0 1,043 122,751,287.00 2,828,909.15 April 2024 177 31 0 0 4 0 142 7,633,526.00 340,566.32 Calendar Year 2024 447 96 0 0 32 0 319 94,028,537.00 1,220,420.13 Fiscal Year 2024 2270 276 109 0 92 0 1793 176,438,593.00 5,692,367.09 April 2023 138 10 4 0 9 0 115 3,579,884.00 169,823.34 Calendar Year 2023 447 88 38 0 32 0 287 24,408,904.00 1,161,115.33 Fiscal Year 2023 1552 198 141 0 111 0 1102 72,256,600.00 3,467,857.51 April 2022 133 12 4 0 5 0 112 3,850,576.00 127,363.13 Calendar Year 2022 401 59 12 0 33 0 297 18,759,555.00 493,882.15 Fiscal Year 2022 1519 209 148 0 108 0 1054 70,278,932.00 2,425,315.04 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Purchasing Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #2 Tracking Number EDC 2025-37 Building Inspection Reports for March and April 2025 Economic Development Committee – June 3, 2025 Informational None All inspections scheduled in March and April 2025. Gina Nelson Community Development Name Department DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR _____ 139-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 10000001 COUNTY INSPECTIONS 0 03/04/2025 Comments1: 7698 FAIRWAY DR PR _____ 140-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 03/05/2025 PR _____ 141-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/26/2025 Comments1: 7334 FAIRWAY DR BC _____ PM 004-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20230205 1972 MEADOWLARK LN 147 03/17/2025 Comments1: NICK - 630-408-9719 BC _____ 005-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/17/2025 GH _____ PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20232333 107 E STAGECOACH TR 03/12/2025 Comments1: CURTIS 630-514-2190 PR 14:00 002-FTG FOOTING 03/13/2025 Comments1: CURTIS GH _____ AM 019-STP STOOPS 20232390 212 WINDHAM CIR 54 03/31/2025 Comments1: FR & R -- JESSICA - APPROVED AS NOTED BF _____ AM 026-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20240003 2810 CRYDER WAY 453 03/26/2025 Comments1: ALADDIN@MBHOMES.COM 815-467-4700 PBF _____ AM 027-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 03/26/2025 Comments1: ALADDIN@MBHOMES.COM 815-467-4700 BF _____ AM 028-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 03/26/2025 BF _____ AM 029-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 03/26/2025 BF _____ 030-REI REINSPECTION 03/28/2025 Comments1: FINAL MECH--ALADDIN@MBHOMES.COM 815-467- Comments2: 4700 BF _____ 031-REI REINSPECTION 03/28/2025 Comments1: FINAL ELECTRIC GS _____ AM 032-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 03/31/2025 Comments1: TEMP -- NEED BBOX VAULT -- AND CANNOT KE Comments2: Y BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20240086 871 WINDETT RIDGE RD 96 03/17/2025 Comments1: FENCE BC _____ AM 031-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20240195 1536 SYCAMORE RD 2 03/17/2025 Comments1: UNITS 111-114 DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BC _____ AM 032-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/17/2025 Comments1: UNITS 111-114 BC _____ AM 033-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/17/2025 Comments1: UNITS 111-114 PBF _____ AM 034-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/17/2025 Comments1: UNITS 111-118 GH _____ AM 035-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/17/2025 Comments1: UNITS 115-118 GH _____ AM 036-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/17/2025 Comments1: UNITS 115-118 GH _____ AM 037-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/17/2025 Comments1: UNITS 115-118 GH _____ AM 038-INS INSULATION 03/18/2025 Comments1: UNITS 101, 102, 103, 104, 106 & 108 BC _____ AM 039-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/19/2025 Comments1: UNITS 201-203 BC _____ AM 040-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/19/2025 Comments1: UNITS 201-203 BC _____ AM 041-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/19/2025 Comments1: UNITS 201-203 PBF _____ AM 042-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/19/2025 Comments1: UNITS 201-206 GH _____ AM 043-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/19/2025 Comments1: UNITS 204-206 GH _____ AM 044-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/19/2025 Comments1: UNITS 204-206 GH _____ AM 045-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/19/2025 Comments1: UNITS 204-206 GH _____ AM 046-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/20/2025 Comments1: UNITS 207, 208 & 210 GH _____ AM 047-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/20/2025 Comments1: UNITS 207, 208 & 210 DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GH _____ AM 048-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/20/2025 Comments1: UNITS 207, 208 & 210 PR _____ AM 049-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/20/2025 Comments1: UNITS 207-213 BC _____ AM 050-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/20/2025 Comments1: UNITS 211-213 BC _____ AM 051-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/20/2025 Comments1: UNITS 211-213 BC _____ AM 052-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/20/2025 Comments1: UNITS 211-213 BC _____ AM 053-INS INSULATION 03/21/2025 Comments1: UNITS 111,112,113,114,115,116,118 BC _____ 054-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/24/2025 Comments1: UNITS 214-218 BC _____ 055-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/24/2025 Comments1: UNITS 214-218 BF _____ AM 056-INS INSULATION 03/27/2025 Comments1: units 201-206 JIM 708-238-5391 BC _____ AM 057-INS INSULATION 03/28/2025 Comments1: UNITS 208-218 BC _____ AM 059-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/31/2025 Comments1: 1ST FLOOR CORRIDOR - JIM 708-238-5391 BC _____ AM 060-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/31/2025 Comments1: 1ST FLOOR CORRIDOR JIM 708-238-5391 BC _____ AM 061-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/31/2025 Comments1: 1ST FLOOR CORRIDOR JIM 708-238-5391 PR _____ AM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20240275 2065 DUNBAR CT 92 03/10/2025 Comments1: BASEMENT-- BERNARDO 630-207-2912 PR _____ AM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/10/2025 PR _____ AM 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/10/2025 PR _____ AM 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/10/2025 DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BC _____ 018-INS INSULATION 20240574 2166 HENNING LN 338 03/03/2025 GH _____ AM 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 20240576 2176 HENNING LN 340 03/21/2025 Comments1: ALLADIN GH _____ AM 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/21/2025 Comments1: ALADDIN NOT READY BC _____ AM 009-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/28/2025 Comments1: ALLADIN 815-467-4700 GH _____ AM 008-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 20240577 2186 HENNING LN 342 03/12/2025 Comments1: ALADDIN GH 14:00 012-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20240609 2881 ALDEN AVE 293 03/11/2025 Comments1: VINCE - 630-461-9708 GH 14:00 013-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 03/11/2025 Comments1: VINCE 630-461-9708 GH 14:00 014-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 03/11/2025 PBF 14:00 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 03/11/2025 Comments1: VINCE - 630-461-9708 BC _____ AM 009-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20240639 551 BISCAYNE CT 2010 03/28/2025 Comments1: SHARON - 630-824-1967 PR _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20241042 2820 BEECHER RD 03/24/2025 Comments1: MARIO PR 13:00 002-OCC OCCUPANCY INSPECTION 20241050 104 E SCHOOLHOUSE RD 03/07/2025 Comments1: KHARISMA BKF 13:00 003-OCC OCCUPANCY INSPECTION 03/07/2025 BF _____ AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241083 1421 N BRIDGE ST 03/06/2025 Comments1: CIRCLE K -- HVAC -- ROOF TOP--JOSEPH 708 Comments2: -774-1430 ***PLEASE DO FIRST**** BF _____ AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241084 2001 S BRIDGE ST 03/06/2025 Comments1: CIRCLE K -- ROOF TOP HVAC -- JOSEPH 708 Comments2: -774-1430 PBF _____ 001-ESW SEWER / WATER 20241085 2176 HENNING LN 340 03/07/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM GH _____ PM 004-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20241201 1220 GILLESPIE LN 414 03/07/2025 Comments1: JENNIFER - 630-365- 7229 PASSED AS NOTED DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GH _____ PM 005-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/07/2025 Comments1: JENNIFER - 630-365-7229 GH _____ PM 006-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/07/2025 PBF _____ PM 007-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/07/2025 Comments1: JEN 630-365-7229 JENN@ABBYPROPERTIES.L Comments2: LC GH _____ AM 008-INS INSULATION 03/10/2025 Comments1: JEN 630-365-7229 GH _____ PM 004-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241202 1218 GILLESPIE LN 413 03/11/2025 Comments1: ABEL GH _____ PM 005-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/11/2025 GH _____ PM 006-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/11/2025 PBF _____ PM 007-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/11/2025 Comments1: JENN@ABBYPROPERTIESLLC -- 630-273-2528 GH _____ PM 008-INS INSULATION 03/12/2025 Comments1: ABEL BF _____ PM 004-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241203 1216 GILLESPIE LN 412 03/14/2025 Comments1: ABELJR@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC -- 630-273-25 Comments2: 28 BF _____ PM 005-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/14/2025 BF _____ PM 006-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/14/2025 PBF _____ PM 007-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/14/2025 Comments1: ABELJR@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC 630-273-2528 GH _____ PM 008-INS INSULATION 03/17/2025 Comments1: ABEL GH _____ AM 004-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241204 1214 GILLESPIE LN 411 03/19/2025 Comments1: ABELJR@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC 630-273-2528 GH _____ AM 005-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/19/2025 Comments1: GROUNDS NOT CONNECTED TO GROUND SCREW, N Comments2: EED TO CHECK AT FINAL INSPECTION BF _____ AM 006-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/19/2025 DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PBF _____ AM 007-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/19/2025 Comments1: ABELJR@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC 630-273-2528 GH _____ PM 008-INS INSULATION 03/20/2025 Comments1: ABEL BC _____ PM 004-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241205 1212 GILLESPIE LN 410 03/25/2025 Comments1: ABEL, JENN BC _____ PM 005-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/25/2025 BC _____ PM 006-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/25/2025 PBF _____ PM 007-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/25/2025 Comments1: ABELJR@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC BC _____ PM 008-INS INSULATION 03/26/2025 BF _____ PM 004-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241206 1210 GILLESPIE LN 409 03/28/2025 Comments1: ABEL BF _____ PM 005-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/28/2025 BF _____ PM 006-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/28/2025 PBF _____ PM 007-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/28/2025 Comments1: ABELJR@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC BC _____ PM 008-INS INSULATION 03/31/2025 GH _____ am 015-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241243 2857 OLD GLORY DR 241 03/05/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 03/21/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ 017-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 03/21/2025 GH _____ 018-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 03/21/2025 PR _____ 019-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 03/21/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM 224-828-3245 GS _____ AM 020-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 03/21/2025 GH _____ AM 016-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241244 2861 OLD GLORY DR 242 03/05/2025 Comments1: MW DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BF _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 03/28/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM -- 224-828-3245 BF _____ 018-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 03/28/2025 BF _____ 019-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 03/28/2025 PBF _____ 020-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 03/28/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM -- 224-828-3245 GS _____ 021-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 03/31/2025 Comments1: OK TO TEMP GH _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241304 3045 CONSTITUTION WAY 517 03/06/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ 017-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 03/06/2025 GH _____ 018-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 03/06/2025 PBF _____ 019-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 03/06/2025 Comments1: JIM 224-828-3245 -- JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM GH _____ AM 020-REI REINSPECTION 03/07/2025 Comments1: ELECTRICAL JIM 224-828-3245 BC _____ 013-INS INSULATION 20241306 312 TIMBER OAK LN 1 03/03/2025 Comments1: TYRELL GH 09:00 014-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/10/2025 Comments1: KEN - 630-546-0735 GH _____ 010-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241308 800 BRISTOL AVE 1 03/07/2025 Comments1: JOHN 630-5468057 PR _____ 011-STP STOOPS 03/20/2025 Comments1: CLAYTON PR _____ 005-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 20241309 802 BRISTOL AVE 2 03/11/2025 PR _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 03/11/2025 PR _____ 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/20/2025 Comments1: CLAYTON PR _____ 008-STP STOOPS 03/20/2025 GH _____ PM 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241347 301 RYAN CT 03/06/2025 Comments1: COVERED PATIO -- NANCY 630-398-1904 DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BC 11:00 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241354 901 FREEMONT ST 03/31/2025 Comments1: SIDING -- SHANNA 630-589-9033 BF _____ PM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241377 1052 CANARY AVE 243 03/07/2025 Comments1: ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM -- DO THIS ONE FIR Comments2: ST -- FRANK 224-237-8025 BF _____ PM 003-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 03/07/2025 BC _____ PM 004-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241383 421 NORWAY CIR 90 03/19/2025 Comments1: MIKE 630-854-8617 GH _____ AM 014-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241384 2867 OLD GLORY DR 243 03/05/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ AM 015-STP STOOPS 03/13/2025 Comments1: REAR STOOP - MW GH 11:00 003-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241393 407 ADAMS ST 03/13/2025 Comments1: IAN: 630-336-6529 GH 11:00 004-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/13/2025 GH 11:00 005-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/13/2025 PR _____ AM 006-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/13/2025 Comments1: IAN 630-336-6529 GH _____ PM 007-REI REINSPECTION 03/17/2025 Comments1: ROUGH FRAME GH _____ PM 008-REI REINSPECTION 03/17/2025 Comments1: ROUGH MECH BC _____ PM 009-INS INSULATION 03/20/2025 Comments1: ADAM 708-2433617 BC 11:00 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241398 901 FREEMONT ST 03/31/2025 Comments1: FURNACE -- SHANNA BF _____ AM 013-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241403 365 TIMBER OAK LN 33 03/26/2025 Comments1: JASON BF _____ AM 014-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 03/26/2025 BF _____ AM 015-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 03/26/2025 PBF _____ AM 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 03/26/2025 Comments1: JJACOBS@RALLYHOMES.NET -- 630-632-7433 DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GS _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 03/26/2025 Comments1: OK TO TEMP GH _____ AM 015-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241404 525 TIMBER OAK LN 26 03/05/2025 Comments1: M.W PASSED AS NOTED GH 11:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20241418 1408 SLATE CT 348 03/13/2025 Comments1: CARRIE - 630-844-2553 X103 PR _____ AM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241421 482 OMAHA DR 83 03/19/2025 Comments1: JIM 224-324-0813 PR _____ AM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/19/2025 PR _____ AM 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/19/2025 PR _____ AM 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/19/2025 PR _____ AM 005-INS INSULATION 03/26/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ PM 007-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241433 435 TIMBER OAK LN 31 03/05/2025 Comments1: JASON 630-632-7433 GH _____ PM 008-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/05/2025 GH _____ PM 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/05/2025 PBF _____ PM 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/05/2025 Comments1: JJACOBS@RALLYHOMES.NET JASON - 630-63 Comments2: 2-7433 GH 10:00 011-INS INSULATION 03/10/2025 Comments1: JASON 630-632-7433 GH _____ AM 012-REI REINSPECTION 03/10/2025 Comments1: FRAMING GH _____ AM 013-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/14/2025 Comments1: KARINA GH _____ AM 014-STP STOOPS 03/12/2025 Comments1: FRONT - KARINA - 815-839-8175 BC _____ AM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241437 2469 CATALPA TR 173 03/21/2025 Comments1: RYAN 309-883-9904 BC _____ AM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/21/2025 DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BC _____ AM 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/21/2025 GH _____ AM 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241440 2690 BIG GROVE CIR 86 03/21/2025 Comments1: KALIN 630-927-2807 PR _____ AM 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 03/21/2025 Comments1: KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM KALIN: 630-927-2807 GH _____ AM 017-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 03/21/2025 GH _____ AM 018-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 03/21/2025 GS _____ AM 019-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 03/21/2025 Comments1: TEMP GH _____ 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241441 2692 BIG GROVE CIR 87 03/06/2025 Comments1: KALIN GH _____ 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/06/2025 GH _____ 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/06/2025 PBF _____ 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/06/2025 Comments1: KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM GH _____ 013-INS INSULATION 03/10/2025 Comments1: KALIN GH _____ AM 014-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/07/2025 Comments1: KARINA 815-839-8175 GH _____ AM 015-STP STOOPS 03/07/2025 Comments1: KARINA 815-839-8175 FRONT ONLY PR _____ 009-WAT WATER 20241491 2823 CRYDER WAY 481 03/14/2025 PR _____ AM 010-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/21/2025 Comments1: REMY PR _____ AM 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/21/2025 PR _____ AM 012-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/21/2025 PR _____ AM 013-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/21/2025 PR _____ 014-SEW SEWER INSPECTION 03/14/2025 GH _____ AM 015-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/20/2025 Comments1: JESSICA DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BC _____ AM 016-INS INSULATION 03/25/2025 Comments1: LATE AM -- JESSICA BC _____ AM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241513 1189 WALSH DR 125 03/21/2025 Comments1: ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM -- THOMAS 224-645 Comments2: -4871 GH _____ 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241517 2874 MCLELLAN BLVD 459 03/06/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/06/2025 GH _____ 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/06/2025 PBF _____ 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/06/2025 Comments1: JIM 224-828-3245 -- JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM GH _____ 013-INS INSULATION 03/10/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ AM 014-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/13/2025 Comments1: KARINA 815-839-8175 GH _____ AM 008-STP STOOPS 20241518 2851 CRYDER WAY 477 03/07/2025 Comments1: FRONT & REAR -- MW GH _____ AM 009-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/19/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ PM 010-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/19/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ PM 011-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/19/2025 GH _____ PM 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/19/2025 Comments1: PASSED AS NOTED PBF _____ 013-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/19/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM 224-828-3245 GH _____ 014-INS INSULATION 03/21/2025 Comments1: JIM PR _____ AM 015-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/26/2025 Comments1: MW PR _____ AM 006-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241536 2719 POTTER CT 141 03/05/2025 Comments1: VICTOR -- 773-876-2605 DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR _____ AM 007-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 03/05/2025 PR _____ AM 008-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 03/05/2025 PR _____ AM 009-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 03/05/2025 GH _____ 016-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20241541 2631 SUTHERLAND CT 36 03/14/2025 PR 12:00 005-ESW SEWER / WATER 20241542 862 HAYDEN DR 59 03/06/2025 Comments1: REMY PR 12:00 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 03/11/2025 GH 10:00 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 03/14/2025 Comments1: JESSICA GH _____ 008-STP STOOPS 03/14/2025 Comments1: FRONT AND REAR PR _____ 009-ESW SEWER / WATER 03/14/2025 GH 08:30 010-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 03/19/2025 Comments1: JESSICA BC _____ AM 011-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 03/20/2025 Comments1: JESSICA BC _____ AM 012-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/20/2025 PBF _____ AM 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20241545 545 TIMBER OAK LN 25 03/03/2025 Comments1: JJACOBS@RALLYHOMES.NET PBF _____ 005-REI REINSPECTION 03/10/2025 Comments1: UNDERGROUND PLUMBING -- JJACOBS@RALLYHOM Comments2: ES.NET GH _____ AM 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 03/12/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ AM 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/12/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ AM 008-STP STOOPS 03/14/2025 Comments1: FRONT -- MW GH _____ AM 009-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 03/14/2025 PBF _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20241553 2694 BIG GROVE CIR 88 03/07/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GH _____ AM 007-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/10/2025 Comments1: DECK -- ANDREW GH _____ AM 008-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 03/13/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ AM 009-STP STOOPS 03/20/2025 Comments1: MW FRONT GH _____ AM 010-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/20/2025 Comments1: MW BF _____ 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/27/2025 Comments1: KALIN 630-927-2807 KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM ** Comments2: ***ACCESS FROM HOUSE TO ATTIC GARAGE BF _____ 012-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/27/2025 Comments1: KALIN 630-927-2807 KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM BF _____ 013-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/27/2025 Comments1: KALIN 630-927-2807 KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM PBF _____ 014-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/27/2025 Comments1: KALIN 630-927-2807 KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM BC _____ AM 015-INS INSULATION 03/31/2025 Comments1: KALIN 630-927-2807 PR _____ AM 005-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241560 401 HEUSTIS ST 03/03/2025 Comments1: CLEAN EDGE PR _____ AM 006-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 03/03/2025 PR _____ AM 007-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 03/03/2025 PR _____ AM 008-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 03/03/2025 PBF _____ 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20241563 2845 MCLELLAN BLVD 482 03/03/2025 Comments1: JIM - 224-828-3245 JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM GH _____ AM 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/03/2025 Comments1: JIM 224-828-3245 GH _____ AM 012-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/03/2025 GH _____ AM 013-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/03/2025 GH _____ 014-INS INSULATION 03/05/2025 Comments1: ALSO CHECK -- HVAC FROM RMC -- JIM DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BC _____ 016-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/24/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ AM 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241564 2868 MCLELLAN BLVD 458 03/12/2025 Comments1: DECK -- JIM GH _____ AM 009-STP STOOPS 03/13/2025 Comments1: FRONT STOOP - MW GH _____ AM 010-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/20/2025 Comments1: MW BF _____ AM 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/27/2025 Comments1: JIM 224-828-3245 JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM BF _____ AM 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/27/2025 Comments1: JIM 224-828-3245 JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM BF _____ AM 013-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/27/2025 Comments1: JIM 224-828-3245 JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM PBF _____ AM 014-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/27/2025 Comments1: JIM 224-828-3245 JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM GH _____ 015-INS INSULATION 03/31/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 20241565 2626 SUTHERLAND CT 32 03/04/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ PM 003-BKF BACKFILL 03/11/2025 Comments1: MW PR _____ 004-WAT WATER 03/12/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM GH _____ PM 005-BG BASEMENT AND GARAGE FLOOR 03/14/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ 006-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 03/18/2025 Comments1: KALIN/RYAN BC _____ AM 007-STP STOOPS 03/28/2025 Comments1: FRONT - MW BF _____ PM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241567 2022 INGEMUNSON LN 140 03/07/2025 Comments1: ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM - FRANK 24-237-802 Comments2: 5 DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BF _____ PM 003-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 03/07/2025 GH _____ PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20241577 2669 BIG GROVE CIR 92 03/13/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 03/17/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 03/25/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM BC _____ AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 03/24/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 03/25/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM BC _____ PM 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 03/28/2025 Comments1: MW BC _____ PM 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/28/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ AM 005-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 20241578 2660 BIG GROVE CIR 71 03/03/2025 Comments1: KALIN PBF _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 03/10/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM GH _____ AM 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 03/11/2025 Comments1: MW BC _____ AM 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/19/2025 Comments1: DECK -- KALIN BF _____ AM 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/28/2025 Comments1: KALIN 630-927-2807 KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM BF _____ AM 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/28/2025 Comments1: KALIN 630-927-2807 KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM BF _____ AM 011-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/28/2025 Comments1: KALIN 630-927-2807 KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM PBF _____ AM 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/28/2025 Comments1: KALIN 630-927-2807 KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM BC _____ PM 014-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/28/2025 Comments1: MW DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BC _____ PM 015-STP STOOPS 03/28/2025 Comments1: FRONT STOOP - MW BC 11:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20241581 607 HEUSTIS ST 4 03/17/2025 Comments1: brian: 224-612-3718 GH _____ AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241588 1411 COTTONWOOD TR 45 03/31/2025 Comments1: SARAH MCKAY - 773-519-7797 PR _____ 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241590 4000 N BRIDGE ST 03/06/2025 PR _____ 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/06/2025 PR _____ 004-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/06/2025 PR _____ 005-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/06/2025 PR _____ 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241591 4000 N BRIDGE ST 03/06/2025 PR _____ 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/06/2025 PR _____ 004-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/06/2025 PR _____ 005-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/06/2025 PR _____ 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241592 4000 N BRIDGE ST 03/06/2025 PR _____ 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/06/2025 PR _____ 004-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/06/2025 PR _____ 005-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/06/2025 PR _____ PM 007-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241599 2387 FAIRFIELD AVE 494 03/18/2025 Comments1: VICTOR PR _____ PM 008-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 03/18/2025 PR _____ PM 009-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 03/18/2025 PR _____ PM 010-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 03/18/2025 GH _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20241600 785 TIMBER OAK LN 9 03/19/2025 Comments1: MW PR _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 03/26/2025 Comments1: MW DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GH _____ PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20241601 2664 BIG GROVE CIR 73 03/20/2025 Comments1: MW BC 11:30 002-FOU FOUNDATION 03/24/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 03/27/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM GH _____ 005-INS INSULATION 20250004 601 ASHWORTH LN 514 03/11/2025 Comments1: VICTOR BC _____ AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250005 3096 GRANDE TR 549 03/18/2025 Comments1: NICK - 773-319-8320 EVS BC _____ AM 002-REI REINSPECTION 20250006 1122 GRACE DR 100 03/03/2025 Comments1: FRAMING ALAN - 630-385-2881 BC _____ AM 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/03/2025 BC _____ AM 004-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/03/2025 PR _____ AM 005-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/03/2025 Comments1: ALAN - 630-385-2881 PR _____ 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250007 129 COMMERCIAL DR 1 03/13/2025 Comments1: 1ST FLOOR PR _____ 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/13/2025 PR _____ 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/13/2025 PR _____ 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/13/2025 PR _____ 005-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 03/21/2025 Comments1: 2ND FLOOR PR _____ 006-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/21/2025 PR _____ 007-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/21/2025 PR _____ 008-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/21/2025 BF _____ AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250008 3137 MATLOCK DR 653 03/14/2025 Comments1: SOLAR - PEDRO 815-342-5187 SHENAROZON@SU Comments2: NRISESOLAR-IL.COM BF _____ AM 002-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 03/14/2025 DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GH _____ AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250009 405 BRUELL ST 03/17/2025 Comments1: BRETT - 815-786-3100 GH _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250012 2633 SUTHERLAND CT 35 03/07/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ PM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 03/11/2025 Comments1: MW PR _____ AM 003-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 03/13/2025 Comments1: ANDREW 331-431-7342 AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM PBF _____ 004-WAT WATER 03/17/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM GH _____ 005-BKF BACKFILL 03/14/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ AM 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 03/21/2025 Comments1: MW TAPE AROUND 2 LOLLY COLUMNS GH _____ AM 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/21/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 008-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 03/25/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM GH _____ 005-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 20250013 2841 CRYDER WAY 479 03/03/2025 PBF _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 03/10/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM GH _____ AM 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 03/13/2025 Comments1: KARINA 815-839-8175 BC _____ 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/24/2025 BC _____ 009-STP STOOPS 03/24/2025 Comments1: FR & R BC _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250014 2884 ROOD STREET 305 03/04/2025 Comments1: KARINA- 815-839-8175 GH 08:30 003-FOU FOUNDATION 03/07/2025 Comments1: KARINA 815-839-8175 PBF _____ 004-WAT WATER 03/11/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GH _____ AM 005-BKF BACKFILL 03/14/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 03/18/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM GH _____ AM 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 03/19/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ AM 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/19/2025 Comments1: NOT READY GH _____ AM 009-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/20/2025 Comments1: MW BC _____ AM 010-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 03/24/2025 Comments1: JIM 2248283245 GH _____ AM 004-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250018 2881 OLD GLORY DR 245 03/11/2025 GH _____ AM 005-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/11/2025 PBF _____ AM 006-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/11/2025 Comments1: KYLE: 630-703-8490 GH _____ AM 007-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/11/2025 Comments1: RECOMMEND INSULATION DRYER DUCT RUNNING Comments2: THROUGH GARAGE GH _____ PM 008-INS INSULATION 03/12/2025 Comments1: AFTER 11:00AM GH _____ PM 009-INS INSULATION 03/17/2025 GH _____ PM 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/17/2025 BF _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250019 2625 SUTHERLAND CT 39 03/27/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 03/31/2025 Comments1: MW - LATE AM PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 20250020 2857 CRYDER WAY 476 03/06/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM GH _____ AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 03/07/2025 Comments1: MW DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 03/12/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ AM 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 03/13/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 03/13/2025 Comments1: MW BC _____ 008-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 03/17/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250021 2853 OLD GLORY DRIVE 240 03/11/2025 Comments1: MW REFER TO SOIL REPORT FOR UNDERCUT ARE Comments2: A GH 12:00 002-FOU FOUNDATION 03/12/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 03/18/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM GH _____ AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 03/19/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 03/25/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM PR _____ 006-BG BASEMENT AND GARAGE FLOOR 03/26/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ 007-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 03/31/2025 Comments1: JIM GH 10:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250024 507 MADISON CT 03/11/2025 Comments1: CANDACE 630-406-8410 X 220 GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 03/13/2025 Comments1: CAN COME ANYTIME - JENNIFER 630-301-959 Comments2: 9 GH _____ PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250039 2847 CRYDER WAY 478 03/18/2025 Comments1: KARINA 815-839-8175 GH _____ PM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 03/21/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 03/27/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BF _____ AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 03/27/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250043 54 W COUNTRYSIDE PKWY 0 03/10/2025 Comments1: SIGN GH _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250045 NWC CORNEILS & ROUTE 47 03/10/2025 Comments1: SIGN -- VINCE 630-999-1616 GH 10:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250050 441 WINDETT RIDGE RD 61 03/12/2025 Comments1: CARRIE - 630-844-2553 X 103 BC _____ AM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250061 557 MANCHESTER LN 396 03/24/2025 Comments1: Ryan: 630-849-6813 PBF _____ AM 002-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/25/2025 Comments1: RYAN: 630-849-6813 BC _____ 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/24/2025 BF _____ AM 004-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/27/2025 Comments1: BASEMENT -- ryan: 630-849-6813 BF _____ AM 005-INS INSULATION 03/27/2025 Comments1: RYAN: 630-849-6813 BC _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250068 2092 SQUIRE CIR 178 03/25/2025 Comments1: MW PR _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 03/26/2025 Comments1: MW PR _____ AM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250071 2684 PATRIOT CT 221 03/11/2025 Comments1: BASEMENT -- JIM 224-324-0813 PR _____ AM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/11/2025 PR _____ AM 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/11/2025 PR _____ AM 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/11/2025 BC _____ PM 005-INS INSULATION 03/17/2025 Comments1: JIM 224-324-0813 BC _____ PM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250072 4542 HALFMOON DR A 359 03/03/2025 Comments1: CLARENCE - 630-449-8666 - WATER HEATER BC 13:00 001-OCC OCCUPANCY INSPECTION 20250074 219 S. BRIDGE ST. 03/04/2025 Comments1: OCCUPANCY - COMMERCIAL - DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BKF 13:00 002-OCC OCCUPANCY INSPECTION 03/04/2025 BC 13:00 003-OCC OCCUPANCY INSPECTION 03/20/2025 Comments1: EARL - 816-876-6045 GH _____ PM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250085 3244 PINEWOOD DR 39 03/18/2025 Comments1: 815-836-8731 PR _____ AM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250087 201 W HYDRAULIC ST 03/13/2025 Comments1: MIKE 630-917-4584 PR _____ AM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/13/2025 PR _____ AM 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/13/2025 PR _____ AM 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/13/2025 BC 11:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250089 106 APPLETREE CT 03/18/2025 Comments1: MARK 630-329-0344 GH 14:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250108 472 BISCAYNE LN 2016 03/10/2025 Comments1: CLASSIC GH 11:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250110 359 SUTTON ST. 03/17/2025 Comments1: brian - 224-612-3718 GH 10:00 002-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 03/18/2025 Comments1: PARTIAL -- LAURA 630-200-7589 GH 11:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250118 2793 BERRYWOOD LN 795 03/14/2025 Comments1: KRIS - 815-834-1200 BC 10:00 001-FTG FOOTING 20250119 2811 CRYDER WAY 454 03/28/2025 Comments1: REMY GH 11:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250120 506 WALSH CT 1 03/07/2025 Comments1: JENNY 630-551-3400 GH 11:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250121 1815 COUNTRY HILLS DR 136 03/14/2025 Comments1: TONY 630-406-8410 X 212 GH 10:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250133 432 BISCAYNE LN 2018 03/18/2025 Comments1: TINA 815-836-8731 BC _____ AM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 03/19/2025 Comments1: LEE 815403-8820 PR _____ AM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250138 4475 E MILLBROOK CIR 231 03/11/2025 Comments1: BASEMENT-- RICH 847-417-1971 DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 23DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 23 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR _____ AM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 03/11/2025 PR _____ AM 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 03/11/2025 PR _____ AM 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 03/11/2025 GH 08:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250139 402 LIBERTY ST 03/10/2025 Comments1: CHRIS 815-557-5375 GH 08:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250140 2466 WAVERLY CIR 238 03/13/2025 Comments1: MIGUEL 630+701-0592 BC _____ PM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250145 938 PURCELL ST 82 03/18/2025 Comments1: CARLA - 815-460-3449 BC 11:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250148 1307 WILLOW WAY 217 03/19/2025 Comments1: JAZLYN 224-220-1042 BC _____ PM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 03/24/2025 Comments1: JAZLYN - 224-220-1042 BC 11:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250149 1961 SUNNY DELL CT 92 03/19/2025 BC _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 03/24/2025 Comments1: FENCE BC 08:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250160 566 BLUESTEM DR 13 03/28/2025 Comments1: JESUS 773-213-7225 BC _____ PM 001-PH POST HOLES / PILES 20250163 OUTLOT 9006 9006 03/31/2025 Comments1: NICK 847-529-4510 GH 11:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250164 411 BISCAYNE LN 1988 03/31/2025 Comments1: SHERRY: 815-836-8731 BC _____ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250190 2661 GOULD CT 64 03/21/2025 Comments1: GINA 630-400-9529 BC _____ AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250195 2211 NORTHLAND LN 98 03/31/2025 Comments1: TRAVIS - 630-688-4528 DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 24DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 24 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: ADD ADDITION 6 BDO COMMERCIAL BUILD-OUT 8 BSM BASEMENT REMODEL 41 CCO COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 5 COM COMMERCIAL BUILDING 2 CRM COMMERCIAL REMODEL 4 DCK DECK 1 ESS BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS 5 EVS ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STAT 1 FNC FENCE 19 HVC HVAC UNIT/S 2 IGP IN-GROUND POOL 1 MF MULTI-FAMILY (APARTMENT/CONDO) 30 MSC MISCELLANEOUS 4 PTO PATIO / PAVERS 2 REM REMODEL 23 REP REPAIR 7 ROF ROOFING 5 RS ROOFING & SIDING 1 SFA SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED 30 SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 199 SGN SIGN 3 SID SIDING 1 SLF SOLAR FARM 1 SOL SOLAR PANELS 2 WHR WATER HEATER REPLACEMENT 1 WIN WINDOW REPLACEMENT 2 INSPECTION SUMMARY: BG BASEMENT AND GARAGE FLOOR 2 BKF BACKFILL 7 BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 11 EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 5 ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 1 ESW SEWER / WATER 3 FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 13 FIN FINAL INSPECTION 32 FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 10 FOU FOUNDATION 10 FTG FOOTING 13 GAR GARAGE FLOOR 27 GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 7 INS INSULATION 27 OCC OCCUPANCY INSPECTION 5 PH POST HOLES / PILES 1 PHD POST HOLE - DECK 2 PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 14 PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READY 11 DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 25DATE: 04/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 25 TIME: 10:45:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2025 TO 03/31/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 33 PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 13 PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 1 REI REINSPECTION 8 REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 39 RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SFD SFA 41 RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 39 ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & WATER 7 SEW SEWER INSPECTION 1 STP STOOPS 14 WAT WATER 9 INSPECTOR SUMMARY: BC BOB CREADEUR 78 BF B&F INSPECTOR CODE SERVICE 40 BKF BRISTOL KENDALL FIRE DEPT 2 GH GINA HASTINGS 156 GS GEORGE STEFFENS 5 PBF PLUMBER 40 PR PETER RATOS 85 STATUS SUMMARY: A GH 1 A PR 3 C BC 10 C BF 6 C BKF 1 C GH 15 C PBF 1 C PR 12 I BC 68 I BF 34 I BKF 1 I GH 129 I GS 3 I PBF 38 I PR 68 T GH 11 T GS 2 T PBF 1 T PR 2 REPORT SUMMARY: 406 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 142-BKF BACKFILL 10000001 COUNTY INSPECTIONS 0 04/04/2025 Comments1: 7161 IRONWOOD CT - YORKVILLE PR _____ 143-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/04/2025 Comments1: 11315 BRIGHTON OAKS DR PR _____ 144-FOU FOUNDATION 04/04/2025 Comments1: 26 TIMBER RIDGE DR-YORKVILLE PR _____ 145-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/28/2025 Comments1: 6005 WHITETAIL RIDGE DR BC 11:00 004-FOU FOUNDATION 20232333 107 E STAGECOACH TR 0 04/09/2025 Comments1: CURTIS BC _____ 005-ELU ELECTRICAL - UNDERSLAB 04/09/2025 Comments1: PHIL 815-666-9683 BC 12:00 006-FTG FOOTING 04/11/2025 Comments1: CURTIS 630-514-2190 PR _____ 007-MIS MISCELLANEOUS 04/11/2025 Comments1: WATER RISER PR 10:00 008-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/14/2025 Comments1: PHIL: 815-666-9683 BC 23:30 009-FTG FOOTING 04/15/2025 Comments1: CURTIS 630-514-2190 BC _____ 010-FTG FOOTING 04/16/2025 Comments1: DUMPSTER PAD GS _____ 033-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20240003 2810 CRYDER WAY 453 04/04/2025 GS _____ 021-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20240117 2911 CRYDER WAY 469 04/16/2025 Comments1: CANNOT KEY BBOX - NEED TO REI FOR TEMP GH _____ 022-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/16/2025 Comments1: ALADDIN GH _____ 023-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/16/2025 GH _____ 024-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/16/2025 PBF _____ 025-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/16/2025 GH 23:00 AM 026-REI REINSPECTION 04/23/2025 Comments1: REI FINAL FRAMING - ALADDIN DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH 23:00 AM 027-REI REINSPECTION 04/23/2025 Comments1: FINAL ELECTRICAL - ALADDIN GS _____ 028-REI REINSPECTION 04/23/2025 Comments1: PER GS OKAY TO TEMP GH _____ AM 062-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20240195 1536 SYCAMORE RD 2 04/02/2025 Comments1: 2ND FLOOR CORRIDOR & 2ND FLOOR STORAGE GH _____ AM 063-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/02/2025 Comments1: 2ND FLOOR CORRIDOR GH _____ AM 064-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/02/2025 Comments1: 2ND FLOOR CORRIDOR PR _____ 065-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/07/2025 Comments1: UNITS 301-308 -- JIM PR _____ 066-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/08/2025 Comments1: UNITS 309-317 -- JIM GH 23:00 AM 067-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/15/2025 Comments1: UNITS 301, 302, 303 GH 23:00 AM 068-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/15/2025 Comments1: UNITS 301, 302, 303 GH 23:00 AM 069-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/15/2025 Comments1: UNITS 301, 302, 303 BC 23:00 AM 070-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/15/2025 Comments1: UNITS 304, 305, 306 BC 23:00 AM 071-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/15/2025 Comments1: UNITS 304, 305, 305 BC 23:00 AM 072-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/15/2025 Comments1: UNITS 304, 305, 306 GH 13:00 PM 073-INS INSULATION 04/21/2025 Comments1: UNITS 301-306 GH 23:00 AM 074-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/21/2025 Comments1: 3 Units, 307-309 JIM 708-238-5391 GH 23:00 AM 075-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/21/2025 Comments1: 3 Units, 307-309 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH 23:00 AM 076-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/21/2025 Comments1: 3 Units, 307-309 GH 13:00 PM 077-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/21/2025 Comments1: UNITS 310, 311, 312 GH 23:00 PM 078-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/21/2025 Comments1: UNITS 310, 311, 312 GH 23:00 AM 079-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/21/2025 Comments1: UNITS 310, 311, 312 BC 23:00 AM 080-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/22/2025 Comments1: 1ST FLOOR POSTAL ROOM, OFFICE AND COMMUN Comments2: ITY ROOM BC 23:00 AM 081-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/22/2025 Comments1: 1ST FLOOR POSTAL ROOM, OFFICE AND COMMUN Comments2: ITY ROOM BC 23:00 AM 082-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/22/2025 Comments1: 1ST FLOOR POSTAL ROOM, OFFICE AND COMMUN Comments2: ITY ROOM BC 23:00 AM 083-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/24/2025 Comments1: 313-318 BC 23:00 AM 084-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/24/2025 Comments1: 313-318 BC 23:00 AM 085-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/24/2025 Comments1: 313-318 GH 23:00 AM 086-INS INSULATION 04/25/2025 Comments1: 307-312 AND STORAGE ROOM GH 23:00 AM 088-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/28/2025 Comments1: TWO STAIRSWAYS X 3 STORIES & 3RD FLOOR C Comments2: ORRIDOR GH 23:00 AM 089-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/28/2025 Comments1: TWO STAIRSWAYS X 3 STORIES & 3RD FLOOR C Comments2: ORRIDOR GH 23:00 AM 090-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/28/2024 Comments1: TWO STAIRSWAYS X 3 STORIES & 3RD FLOOR C Comments2: ORRIDOR DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC 23:00 AM 091-INS INSULATION 04/30/2025 Comments1: JIM -- UNITS 313-318 GS _____ 024-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20240308 2765 BERRYWOOD LN 788 04/09/2025 Comments1: SEE NOTES BC _____ 003-REI REINSPECTION 20240460 722 OMAHA DR 46 04/30/2025 Comments1: POOL -- MARCUS BC 13:00 PM 010-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20240576 2176 HENNING LN 340 04/23/2025 Comments1: ALLADIN -- SEE INSPECTION NOTES BC 13:00 PM 011-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/23/2025 BC 13:00 PM 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/23/2025 PBF 13:00 PM 013-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/23/2025 Comments1: ALADDIN@MBHOMES.COM BC 13:00 PM 014-REI REINSPECTION 04/25/2025 Comments1: ROUGH FRAMING BC 13:00 PM 015-REI REINSPECTION 04/25/2025 Comments1: ROUGH ELECTRICAL GS _____ 023-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20240629 3374 SEELEY CT 813 04/09/2025 Comments1: SEE NOTES GS _____ 021-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20240630 3384 SEELEY CT 812 04/09/2025 Comments1: SEE NOTES GS _____ 022-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20240631 2757 BERRYWOOD LN 786 04/09/2025 Comments1: PROPERTY PINS GS _____ 022-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20240632 2753 BERRYWOOD LN 785 04/09/2025 Comments1: PROPERTY PINS GS _____ 023-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20240707 452 BISCAYNE LN 2017 04/04/2025 Comments1: TEMP TO FINAL GS _____ 025-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20240708 512 BISCAYNE CT 2013 04/04/2025 Comments1: TEMP TO FINAL GS _____ 024-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20240791 4436 TAMPA DR 1974 04/23/2025 Comments1: 4 CRACKED EDGES ON PUBLIC WALKS - FAILED Comments2: PER GS GS _____ 023-REI REINSPECTION 20240792 552 BISCAYNE CT 2011 04/23/2025 Comments1: TEMP TO FINAL - DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC 23:00 AM 014-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20240845 328 POPLAR DR 93 04/21/2025 Comments1: RSS BC 23:00 AM 015-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 04/21/2025 Comments1: RSS PR _____ 003-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 20240911 579 E KENDALL DR 1 04/16/2025 PR _____ 002-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 20241042 2820 BEECHER RD 0 04/16/2025 PR _____ 003-FTG FOOTING 04/16/2025 GH 23:00 AM 022-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241117 3046 JETER ST 564 04/29/2025 Comments1: MW GS _____ 025-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20241119 492 BISCAYNE LN 2015 04/04/2025 Comments1: TEMP TO FINAL BC _____ 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20241201 1220 GILLESPIE LN 414 04/01/2025 BC _____ 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20241202 1218 GILLESPIE LN 413 04/01/2025 BC _____ 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20241203 1216 GILLESPIE LN 412 04/01/2025 BC _____ 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20241204 1214 GILLESPIE LN 411 04/01/2025 BC _____ 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20241205 1212 GILLESPIE LN 410 04/01/2025 BC _____ 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20241206 1210 GILLESPIE LN 409 04/01/2025 GH _____ AM 021-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241226 2864 OLD GLORY DR 276 04/14/2025 Comments1: MW GH 23:00 AM 018-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241227 3038 JETER ST 563 04/29/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ AM 021-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241228 2858 OLD GLORY DR 277 04/14/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ AM 021-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241243 2857 OLD GLORY DR 241 04/14/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ AM 022-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241244 2861 OLD GLORY DR 242 04/14/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ AM 021-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241245 2848 OLD GLORY DR 279 04/14/2025 Comments1: MW - REMOVE SIGN AT END OF PUBLIC WALK B Comments2: EFORE POURING DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH _____ AM 020-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241246 2854 OLD GLORY DR 278 04/14/2025 Comments1: MW PR _____ AM 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20241257 504 S MAIN ST 0 04/07/2025 Comments1: EARLY -- BRIAN 815-922-9051 PR _____ AM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/10/2025 Comments1: 1ST FLR - PARTIAL 2ND PR 11:00 003-FTG FOOTING 04/10/2025 PR _____ pm 004-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/09/2025 PR 23:00 AM 005-FOU FOUNDATION 04/15/2025 PR 23:00 AM 006-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/15/2025 PR 23:00 AM 007-FOU FOUNDATION 04/21/2025 Comments1: RYAN 630-220-6263 PR 23:00 AM 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/22/2025 PR 23:00 AM 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/22/2025 Comments1: 3RD FLOOR ELECTRIC PR _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/17/2025 PR _____ 011-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/28/2025 GH 23:00 AM 021-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241304 3045 CONSTITUTION WAY 517 04/29/2025 Comments1: GH GH 09:00 015-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20241306 312 TIMBER OAK LN 1 04/10/2025 Comments1: RSS 630-546-0891 BC 23:00 AM 016-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/24/2025 Comments1: TYRELL BC _____ AM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241307 4569 GARDINER AVE 1102 04/03/2025 Comments1: ENERGY BACKUP SYSTEM -- AXEL 801-970-156 Comments2: 6 GH _____ PM 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241309 802 BRISTOL AVE 2 04/07/2025 Comments1: CLAYTON GH _____ PM 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/07/2025 GH _____ PM 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/07/2025 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ PM 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/07/2025 GH _____ AM 013-INS INSULATION 04/10/2025 Comments1: CLAYTON - 630-336-3678 GH _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20241322 2671 BIG GROVE CIR 91 04/02/2025 Comments1: MW PASSED AS NOTED GH _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/04/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/10/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM GH _____ AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 04/09/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/17/2025 Comments1: ANDREW GH 13:00 PM 006-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/22/2025 Comments1: MW GH 23:00 AM 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/24/2025 Comments1: MW BC _____ AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241326 592 TIMBER OAK LN 45 04/02/2025 Comments1: MIKE - 440-655-7071 BC _____ AM 002-BND POOL BONDING 20241331 2844 OLD GLORY DR 280 04/04/2025 Comments1: PHIL 630-632-2949 BC _____ AM 003-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/04/2025 Comments1: PHIL 6306322949 GH _____ 021-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241339 2688 BIG GROVE CIR 85 04/15/2025 Comments1: BATCH REPORT RECEIVED GH 23:00 AM 021-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241340 2667 BIG GROVE CIR 93 04/21/2025 Comments1: MW GS _____ 022-ADA ADA ACCESSIBLE WALK WAY 04/22/2025 PR 23:00 AM 006-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241362 204 W BEECHER ST 0 04/21/2025 Comments1: RYAN 224-240-6981 PR 23:00 AM 007-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/21/2025 Comments1: RYAN 224-240-6981 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR 23:00 AM 008-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/21/2025 BC _____ PM 004-REI REINSPECTION 20241377 1052 CANARY AVE 243 04/03/2025 Comments1: ESS -- FRANK 224-237-8025 BC 23:00 AM 005-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20241383 421 NORWAY CIR 90 04/24/2025 Comments1: MIKE 630-854-8617 BC _____ 006-INS INSULATION 04/24/2025 GH _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241384 2867 OLD GLORY DR 243 04/10/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ 017-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/10/2025 GH _____ 018-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/10/2025 PBF _____ 019-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/10/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM -- 224-828-3245 GS _____ 020-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 04/11/2025 Comments1: OK TO TEMP GH _____ AM 021-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 04/14/2025 Comments1: MW GS _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20241404 525 TIMBER OAK LN 26 04/16/2025 Comments1: OK TO TEMP BC 23:00 AM 017-REI REINSPECTION 04/17/2025 Comments1: FRAMING REI BC _____ 018-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/16/2025 Comments1: JASON BC _____ 019-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/16/2025 BC _____ 020-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/16/2025 PBF _____ 021-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/16/2025 BC _____ AM 001-TRN TRENCH - (GAS, ELECTRIC, 20241434 1342 SPRING ST 176 04/02/2025 Comments1: DEREK 630-768-1156 BC 23:00 AM 002-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/25/2025 Comments1: TODD: 630-973-1145 BC 23:00 AM 003-BND POOL BONDING 04/25/2025 Comments1: SOUTH END OF POOL NOT PROPERLY BONDED DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 004-REI REINSPECTION 04/29/2025 Comments1: POOL BONDING BC 13:00 PM 004-REI REINSPECTION 20241437 2469 CATALPA TR 173 04/25/2025 Comments1: ROUGH FRAMING AND ROUGH ELECTRICAL -- RY Comments2: AN GH _____ 020-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241440 2690 BIG GROVE CIR 86 04/15/2025 Comments1: BATCH REPORT RECEIVED PBF _____ 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 20241441 2692 BIG GROVE CIR 87 04/17/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM GH _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/23/2025 Comments1: ANDREW GH _____ 018-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/23/2025 GH _____ 019-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/17/2025 GH _____ 020-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 04/15/2025 Comments1: BATCH REPORT RECEIVED PR _____ 021-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/21/2025 Comments1: REINSPECTION - AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM GH 23:00 AM 015-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241442 2628 SUTHERLAND CT 33 04/21/2025 Comments1: MW GH 23:00 AM 015-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241443 2630 SUTHERLAND CT 34 04/21/2025 Comments1: MW PR _____ AM 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20241452 1386 SPRING ST 213 04/11/2025 GH 23:00 AM 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/24/2025 Comments1: KEN BC _____ 007-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/29/2025 BC _____ 008-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/29/2025 BC _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/29/2025 PR _____ 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/29/2025 PBF _____ AM 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20241453 1200 GILLESPIE LN 405 04/04/2025 Comments1: JENN@ABBYPROPERTISLLC DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH _____ PM 002-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/04/2025 GH 13:00 PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/17/2025 Comments1: JENN PBF _____ AM 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20241454 1202 GILLESPIE LN 406 04/04/2025 Comments1: JENN@ABBYPROPERTISLLC GH _____ PM 002-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/04/2025 GH 13:00 PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/17/2025 Comments1: JENN PBF _____ AM 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20241455 1204 GILLESPIE LN 407 04/04/2025 Comments1: JENN@ABBYPROPERTISLLC GH _____ PM 002-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/04/2025 GH 13:00 PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/17/2025 Comments1: JENN PBF _____ AM 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20241456 1206 GILLESPIE LN 408 04/04/2025 Comments1: JENN@ABBYPROPERTISLLC GH _____ PM 002-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/04/2025 GH 13:00 PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/17/2025 Comments1: JENN PBF _____ AM 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20241457 1201 GILLESPIE LN 404 04/04/2025 Comments1: JENN@ABBYPROPERTISLLC GH _____ PM 002-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/04/2025 Comments1: JENN GH 13:00 PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/17/2025 Comments1: JENN PBF _____ AM 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20241458 1203 GILLESPIE LN 403 04/04/2025 Comments1: JENN@ABBYPROPERTISLLC GH _____ PM 002-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/04/2025 GH 13:00 PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/17/2025 Comments1: JENN PBF _____ AM 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20241459 1205 GILLESPIE LN 402 04/04/2025 Comments1: JENN@ABBYPROPERTISLLC DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH _____ PM 002-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/04/2025 GH 13:00 PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/17/2025 Comments1: JENN PBF _____ AM 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20241460 1207 GILLESPIE LN 401 04/04/2025 Comments1: JENN@ABBYPROPERTISLLC GH _____ PM 002-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/04/2025 GH 13:00 PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/17/2025 Comments1: JENN GH _____ PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241477 1230 GILLESPIE LN 04/03/2025 Comments1: JENN BC _____ 004-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/01/2025 Comments1: OHMS: 12.72 GH _____ AM 005-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/04/2025 Comments1: JENN GH _____ PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241478 1232 GILLESPIE LN 04/03/2025 GH _____ AM 004-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/04/2025 Comments1: JENN GH _____ PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241479 1234 GILLESPIE LN 04/03/2025 GH _____ 004-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/04/2025 GH _____ PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241480 1236 GILLESPIE LN 04/03/2025 GH _____ AM 004-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/04/2025 GH _____ PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241481 1238 GILLESPIE LN 04/03/2025 GH _____ AM 004-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/04/2025 GH _____ PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241482 1240 GILLESPIE LN 04/03/2025 GH _____ AM 004-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/04/2025 GH _____ PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241483 1242 GILLESPIE LN 0 04/03/2025 Comments1: ABBY GH _____ AM 004-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/04/2025 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH _____ PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241484 1244 GILLESPIE LN 04/03/2025 Comments1: JENN GH _____ AM 004-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/04/2025 GH 23:00 AM 005-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/29/2025 Comments1: JENN GH 23:00 AM 006-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/29/2025 Comments1: JENN GH 23:00 AM 007-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/29/2025 Comments1: JENN PBF _____ AM 008-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/29/2025 Comments1: JENN@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC GH 23:00 AM 009-INS INSULATION 04/30/2025 Comments1: JENN GH _____ PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241485 1246 GILLESPIE LN 0 04/03/2025 Comments1: JENN GH _____ AM 004-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/04/2025 BF 13:00 PM 005-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/24/2025 Comments1: JENN@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC BF 13:00 PM 006-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/24/2025 Comments1: JENN BF 13:00 PM 007-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/24/2025 PBF 13:00 PM 008-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/24/2025 Comments1: JENN@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC GH 13:00 PM 009-INS INSULATION 04/25/2025 Comments1: JENN GH _____ PM 003-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20241486 1248 GILLESPIE LN 0 04/03/2025 Comments1: JENN GH _____ AM 004-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/04/2025 PBF _____ 005-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/17/2025 Comments1: ABELJR@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC BF 23:00 AM 006-INS INSULATION 04/21/2025 Comments1: ABEL DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC 13:00 PM 007-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/17/2025 Comments1: ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC@GMAIL.COM BC 13:00 PM 008-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/17/2025 BC 13:00 PM 009-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/17/2025 BC 09:00 017-STP STOOPS 20241491 2823 CRYDER WAY 481 04/04/2025 Comments1: FR & R -- MW GS _____ 015-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20241517 2874 MCLELLAN BLVD 459 04/16/2025 Comments1: OKAY TO TEMP GH _____ 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/24/2025 GH _____ 017-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/24/2025 GH _____ 018-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/24/2025 PBF _____ 019-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/24/2025 GH 23:00 AM 020-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 04/29/2025 Comments1: PARTIAL PUBLIC WALK - MW GS _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20241518 2851 CRYDER WAY 477 04/16/2025 Comments1: OK TO TEMP GH 23:00 AM 017-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 04/29/2025 Comments1: PUB & SERV MW GH 23:00 AM 018-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/30/2025 Comments1: JIM GH 23:00 AM 019-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/30/2025 GH 23:00 AM 020-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/30/2025 PBF _____ 021-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/30/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM GH 23:00 AM 017-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241541 2631 SUTHERLAND CT 36 04/21/2025 Comments1: MW PR 23:00 AM 013-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241542 862 HAYDEN DR 59 04/25/2025 Comments1: JESSICA PR 23:00 AM 014-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/25/2025 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR 23:00 AM 015-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/25/2025 PR 23:00 AM 016-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/24/2025 Comments1: REMY GH 23:00 AM 017-INS INSULATION 04/30/2025 GH _____ PM 018-REI REINSPECTION 04/30/2025 Comments1: INSULATION PR _____ PM 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20241545 545 TIMBER OAK LN 25 04/02/2025 Comments1: JJACOBS@RALLYHOMES.NET BC _____ PM 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/03/2025 Comments1: JASON BC _____ PM 012-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/03/2025 BC _____ PM 013-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/03/2025 BC _____ AM 014-INS INSULATION 04/07/2025 Comments1: JASON GH 23:00 AM 016-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20241553 2694 BIG GROVE CIR 88 04/17/2025 Comments1: MW GS _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 04/16/2025 Comments1: OK TO TEMP BC 12:00 002-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20241559 911 HAMPTON LN 135 04/07/2025 Comments1: DANIEL 786-370-9053 GS _____ 017-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20241563 2845 MCLELLAN BLVD 482 04/16/2025 Comments1: OKAY TO TEMP GH _____ 018-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/23/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ 019-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/23/2025 GH _____ 020-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/23/2025 PBF _____ 021-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/23/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM GH 23:00 AM 022-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 04/29/2025 Comments1: PUB AND SERV MW DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GS _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 20241564 2868 MCLELLAN BLVD 458 04/16/2025 Comments1: OKAY TO TEMP GH _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/24/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ 018-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/24/2025 GH _____ 019-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/24/2025 PBF _____ 020-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/24/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM GH 23:00 AM 021-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 04/29/2025 Comments1: PUB & SERV MW BC _____ PM 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241565 2626 SUTHERLAND CT 32 04/08/2025 Comments1: ANDREW: 331-431-7342 BC _____ PM 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/08/2025 Comments1: ANDREW: 331-431-7342 BC _____ PM 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/08/2025 Comments1: ANDREW: 331-431-7342 PBF _____ PM 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/08/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM BC _____ AM 012-INS INSULATION 04/10/2025 Comments1: ANDREW GH 23:00 AM 013-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 04/29/2025 Comments1: MW GH 23:00 AM 009-STP STOOPS 20241577 2669 BIG GROVE CIR 92 04/17/2025 Comments1: FRONT AND REAR GH 23:00 AM 010-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/22/2025 Comments1: ANDREW 331-431-7342 GH 23:00 AM 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/22/2025 GH 23:00 AM 012-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/22/2025 PBF _____ 013-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/22/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM GH 23:00 AM 014-INS INSULATION 04/24/2025 Comments1: ANDREW 331-431-7342 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH _____ 015-REI REINSPECTION 04/24/2025 Comments1: FRAMING BC _____ AM 013-INS INSULATION 20241578 2660 BIG GROVE CIR 71 04/01/2025 Comments1: KALIN GH 11:30 002-REI REINSPECTION 20241580 213 LEISURE ST 04/07/2025 Comments1: PHF - JAZLYN - 224-220-1042 GH _____ 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/14/2025 Comments1: FENCE PR _____ 006-MIS MISCELLANEOUS 20241590 4000 N BRIDGE ST 04/10/2025 Comments1: HOOD SYSTEM PR _____ 006-MIS MISCELLANEOUS 20241592 4000 N BRIDGE ST 04/10/2025 Comments1: HOOD SYSTEM BC _____ PM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20241597 1262 SPRING ST 190 04/09/2025 Comments1: THOMAS - 224-645-4871 BC _____ AM 003-BKF BACKFILL 20241600 785 TIMBER OAK LN 9 04/03/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/08/2025 Comments1: JJACOBS@RALLYHOMES.COM GH _____ AM 005-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/10/2025 Comments1: JASON PBF _____ 006-ESW SEWER / WATER 04/11/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM GH _____ PM 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/14/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ PM 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/14/2025 Comments1: MW PR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20241601 2664 BIG GROVE CIR 73 04/02/2025 Comments1: ANDREW 331.431.7342 AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM GH _____ AM 005-BG BASEMENT AND GARAGE FLOOR 04/04/2025 Comments1: MW PASSED AS NOTED GH 23:00 AM 007-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/04/2025 Comments1: ANDREW PASSED AS NOTED DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH _____ 008-STP STOOPS 04/17/2025 Comments1: FRONT PR _____ 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/25/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM PR _____ 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/25/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM PR _____ 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/25/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM PR _____ 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/25/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM BC 23:00 AM 013-INS INSULATION 04/29/2025 Comments1: ANDREW PR _____ AM 007-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 20250004 601 ASHWORTH LN 514 04/03/2025 PR _____ AM 008-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/03/2025 PR _____ AM 009-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/03/2025 PR _____ AM 010-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/03/2025 PR 23:00 AM 006-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20250006 1122 GRACE DR 100 04/22/2025 Comments1: ALAN PR _____ AM 009-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250007 129 COMMERCIAL DR 1 04/30/2025 PR _____ AM 010-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/30/2025 PR _____ AM 011-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/30/2025 PR _____ AM 012-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/30/2025 GH _____ 010-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250012 2633 SUTHERLAND CT 35 04/16/2025 Comments1: ANDREW GH _____ 011-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/16/2025 Comments1: ANDREW GH _____ 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/16/2025 Comments1: ANDREW GH 23:00 AM 013-STP STOOPS 04/21/2025 Comments1: FRONT - MW DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH _____ 014-INS INSULATION 04/17/2025 GH 23:00 AM 015-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 04/29/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ 010-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250013 2841 CRYDER WAY 479 04/01/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ 011-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/01/2025 GH _____ 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/01/2025 PBF _____ 013-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/01/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM JIM 224-828-3245 GH _____ 014-INS INSULATION 04/03/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ AM 015-REI REINSPECTION 04/02/2025 GS _____ 016-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 04/16/2025 Comments1: OK TO TEMP GH 23:00 AM 017-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 04/29/2025 Comments1: MW BC _____ 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250014 2884 ROOD STREET 305 04/09/2025 Comments1: JIM 224-828-3245 BC _____ AM 012-STP STOOPS 04/11/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ 013-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/22/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ 014-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/22/2025 GH _____ 015-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/22/2025 PBF _____ 016-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/22/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM GH _____ 017-INS INSULATION 04/24/2025 Comments1: JIM PR _____ 003-WAT WATER 20250019 2625 SUTHERLAND CT 39 04/07/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH _____ AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 04/04/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/10/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM GH _____ PM 006-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/14/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ PM 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/14/2025 GH 23:00 AM 010-STP STOOPS 20250020 2857 CRYDER WAY 476 04/01/2025 Comments1: FR & R -- MW BATCH TICKET RECEVED GH _____ 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/09/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ 012-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/09/2025 GH _____ 013-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/09/2025 PBF _____ 014-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/09/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM GH _____ 015-INS INSULATION 04/11/2025 Comments1: JIM GH _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250021 2853 OLD GLORY DR 240 04/11/2025 Comments1: DECK BC 23:00 AM 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/30/2025 Comments1: JIM BC 23:00 AM 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/30/2025 BC 23:00 AM 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/30/2025 PBF _____ AM 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/30/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM PR 12:00 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20250030 935 ERICA LN 0 04/29/2025 Comments1: DAVID 773-726-3820 BC _____ AM 002-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/30/2025 Comments1: DAVID 773-726-3820 BC _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250032 2629 SUTHERLAND CT 37 04/11/2025 Comments1: MW DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/14/2025 Comments1: MW GH 13:00 PM 003-BKF BACKFILL 04/17/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 004-WAT WATER 04/22/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM PBF _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/24/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM GH 23:00 AM 006-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/28/2025 Comments1: ANDREW: 33-431-7342 GH 23:00 AM 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/28/2025 Comments1: MW GH 23:00 AM 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/28/2025 Comments1: MW BF 23:00 AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250033 812 PARKSIDE LN 182 04/24/2025 Comments1: SOLAR -- MIKAYLA- 847-698-0549 BF 23:00 AM 002-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/24/2025 PBF _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20250039 2847 CRYDER WAY 478 04/01/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM BC _____ AM 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/02/2025 Comments1: MW BC _____ AM 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/02/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ 008-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/10/2025 Comments1: JIM GH 23:00 AM 009-STP STOOPS 04/29/2025 Comments1: FRONT AND REAR BC 23:00 AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250044 2761 ROYAL CT 106 04/17/2025 Comments1: ADRIANNA 815-260-5034 BC _____ AM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/30/2025 Comments1: ADRIANNA 815-260-5034 GH _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250063 2686 BIG GROVE CIR 84 04/02/2025 Comments1: MW DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/04/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/10/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM GH _____ AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 04/09/2025 Comments1: MW GH 23:00 AM 005-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/17/2025 GH 23:00 AM 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/17/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ PM 007-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/16/2025 Comments1: ANDREW PBF _____ 008-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/16/2025 GH _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250064 2878 CRYDER WAY 442 04/01/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ PM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/02/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/09/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM GH _____ AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 04/09/2025 Comments1: MW GH 13:00 PM 005-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/17/2025 Comments1: MW GH 13:00 PM 006-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/17/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 007-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/17/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM BC _____ 008-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/25/2025 PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 20250068 2092 SQUIRE CIR 178 04/01/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM GH _____ 004-BKF BACKFILL 04/01/2025 Comments1: MW DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/09/2025 Comments1: JIM BC _____ AM 006-BG BASEMENT AND GARAGE FLOOR 04/10/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ 007-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/17/2025 Comments1: JIM PR 13:00 PM 006-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250071 2684 PATRIOT CT 221 04/17/2025 Comments1: JIM 224-324-0813 PR 13:00 PM 007-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/17/2025 PR 13:00 PM 008-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/17/2025 PR 13:00 PM 009-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/17/2025 PR _____ AM 006-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250075 2475 FAIRFAX WAY 246 04/08/2025 Comments1: BASEMENT -- CLEAN EDGE PR _____ AM 007-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/08/2025 PR _____ AM 008-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/08/2025 PR _____ AM 009-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/08/2025 BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250080 620 W VETERANS PKWY. 0 04/15/2025 Comments1: SIGNS -- GH 13:00 PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250081 2621 SUTHERLAND CT 41 04/17/2025 Comments1: MW GH 23:00 AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/21/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/24/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM BC _____ 004-BKF BACKFILL 04/25/2025 PBF _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/30/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM GH 13:00 PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250082 2620 SUTHERLAND CT 29 04/17/2025 Comments1: MW GH 23:00 AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/21/2025 Comments1: MW DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 23 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 23 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/24/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM BC _____ 004-BKF BACKFILL 04/25/2025 PBF _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/30/2025 Comments1: AMEEKS@NVRINC.COM GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250108 472 BISCAYNE LN 2016 04/25/2025 Comments1: CLASSIC GH 13:00 PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250111 2658 BIG GROVE CIR 70 04/29/2025 Comments1: MW GH 20:30 001-FTG FOOTING 20250112 2673 BIG GROVE CIR 90 04/24/2025 Comments1: UNDERCUT, REFER TO SOIL REPORT GH _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250113 2854 CRYDER WAY 446 04/08/2025 Comments1: NW GH _____ PM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/09/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/15/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/17/2025 Comments1: JFLAHERT@NVRINC.COM BC _____ 005-BKF BACKFILL 04/21/2025 GH 13:00 PM 006-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/24/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/24/2025 Comments1: MW GH 23:00 AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250114 2852 ROOD ST 308 04/29/2025 Comments1: MW GH 23:00 AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/30/2025 Comments1: PASSED AS NOTED GH _____ PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250115 2893 MCLELLAN BLVD 490 04/14/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/16/2025 Comments1: MW DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 24 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 24 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/22/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM GH 23:00 AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 04/24/2025 Comments1: MW BC 09:00 002-FOU FOUNDATION 20250119 2811 CRYDER WAY 454 04/04/2025 Comments1: JESSICA GH _____ AM 003-BKF BACKFILL 04/11/2025 Comments1: JESSICA PR _____ AM 004-WAT WATER 04/14/2025 Comments1: REMY PR 23:00 AM 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/17/2025 Comments1: JESSICA GH _____ PM 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/21/2025 Comments1: REMY NOT READY GH _____ PM 007-STP STOOPS 04/21/2025 Comments1: REMY NOT READY GH 23:00 AM 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/21/2025 Comments1: REMY NOT READY GH 20:00 009-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/22/2025 Comments1: REMY GH 20:00 010-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/22/2025 GH 20:00 011-STP STOOPS 04/22/2025 Comments1: FRONT ONLY GH 23:00 AM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250120 506 WALSH CT 1 04/25/2025 Comments1: CLASSIC BC _____ 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250123 4434 SARASOTA AVE 2007 04/17/2025 Comments1: JUSTIN 331-643-8738 BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250124 624 W VETERANS PKWY UNIT 04/07/2025 Comments1: SIGN -- VINCE GH 23:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250134 4652 PLYMOUTH AVE 987 04/15/2025 Comments1: JAZLYN - 244-220-1042 GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/22/2025 Comments1: FENCE -- DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 25 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 25 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 002-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250135 1307 WILLOW WAY 217 04/21/2025 Comments1: NO ICE AND WATER - REVIEWED POST ROOF IN Comments2: STALLATION BC _____ AM 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20250137 1584 CORNERSTONE DR 30 04/08/2025 Comments1: PATIO -- JOHN 630-862-8053 BC _____ AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250147 234 E VETERANS PKWY 1 04/11/2025 Comments1: TEMP TENT -- JEWEL GH _____ AM 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20250152 2431 ANNA MARIA LN 705 04/16/2025 Comments1: JOHN 630-862-8053 BC _____ AM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250155 3453 CALEDONIA DR 191 04/01/2025 Comments1: ARTURO 6304068410 BC _____ AM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/07/2025 Comments1: FENCE -- TONY GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250160 566 BLUESTEM DR 13 04/17/2025 Comments1: FENCE BC _____ AM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250161 3142 JUSTICE DR 610 04/10/2025 Comments1: BASEMENT -- VICTOR 773-876-2605 BC _____ AM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/10/2025 BC _____ 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/10/2025 BC 23:00 AM 004-INS INSULATION 04/21/2025 Comments1: VICTOR BC _____ AM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250162 3145 JUSTICE DR 692 04/10/2025 Comments1: BASEMENT -- VICTOR BC _____ AM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/10/2025 BC 23:00 AM 003-INS INSULATION 04/21/2025 Comments1: VICTOR GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250164 411 BISCAYNE LN 1988 04/08/2025 Comments1: FENCE -- NATALIE 630-808-6200 GH _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250165 310 ILLINI DR 10 04/09/2025 Comments1: FR DOOR GH 13:00 PM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250170 826 HAYDEN DR 61 04/23/2025 Comments1: ENRIQUE PASSED AS NOTED DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 26 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 26 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH 23:00 AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250171 3096 JETER ST 572 04/23/2025 Comments1: JOHN 630-862-8053 BC 23:00 AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250172 2685 PATRIOT CT 226 04/17/2025 Comments1: JOHN 630-862-8053 GH 12:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250173 1193 TAUS CIR 113 04/07/2025 Comments1: JAZLYN: 224-220-1042 GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/16/2025 Comments1: FENCE BC 14:00 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20250177 3083 CONSTITUTION WAY 509 04/08/2025 Comments1: GUS -- 331-717-8254 GH _____ AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250179 101 W HYDRAULIC ST 0 04/09/2025 Comments1: BATCH REPORT RECEIVED GH 23:00 AM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/30/2025 GH _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250180 378 TIMBALIER ST. 0 04/22/2025 GH _____ AM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250184 534 COACH RD 408 04/01/2025 Comments1: ARTURO 630-406-8410 BC _____ AM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/03/2025 GH _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250185 3500 RICHARDSON CIR 1314 04/08/2025 Comments1: JESUS 630-453-9281 GH _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/11/2025 Comments1: JEFF 630-330-6705 PBF _____ PM 003-WAT WATER 04/14/2025 Comments1: MIKE: 847-385-8657 PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/16/2025 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/21/2025 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 007-BKF BACKFILL 04/21/2025 Comments1: CHRIS GH 13:00 PM 008-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/23/2025 Comments1: CHRIS DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 27 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 27 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH 23:00 AM 009-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/24/2025 Comments1: LATE AM GH 23:00 AM 010-STP STOOPS 04/24/2025 Comments1: LATE AM BATCH REPORT RECEIVED GH _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250186 3506 RICHARDSON CIR 1311 04/08/2025 Comments1: JESUS 630-453-9281 GH _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/11/2025 Comments1: JEFF 630-330-6705 PBF _____ PM 003-WAT WATER 04/14/2025 Comments1: MIKE: 847-385-2657 PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/16/2025 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/21/2025 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 007-BKF BACKFILL 04/21/2025 Comments1: CHRIS GH 13:00 PM 008-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/23/2025 Comments1: CHRIS GH 23:00 AM 009-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/24/2025 Comments1: LATE AM GH 23:00 AM 010-STP STOOPS 04/24/2025 Comments1: BATCH REPORT RECEIVED GH _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250187 3504 RICHARDSON CIR 1312 04/08/2025 Comments1: JESUS 630-453-9281 GH _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/11/2025 Comments1: JEFF PBF _____ PM 003-WAT WATER 04/14/2025 Comments1: MIKE: 847-385-2657 PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/16/2025 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/21/2025 Comments1: CHRIS DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 28 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 28 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 007-BKF BACKFILL 04/21/2025 Comments1: CHRIS GH 13:00 PM 008-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/23/2025 GH 23:00 AM 009-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/24/2025 Comments1: LATE AM GH 23:00 AM 010-STP STOOPS 04/24/2025 Comments1: LATE AM RECEIVED BATCH REPORT GH _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250188 3502 RICHARDSON CIR 1313 04/08/2025 Comments1: JESUS 630-453-9281 GH _____ AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/11/2025 Comments1: JEFF PBF _____ PM 003-WAT WATER 04/14/2025 Comments1: MIKE: 847-385-2657 PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/16/2025 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/21/2025 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 007-BKF BACKFILL 04/21/2025 Comments1: CHRIS GH 13:00 PM 008-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/23/2025 Comments1: CHRIS GH 23:00 AM 009-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/24/2025 Comments1: LATE AM GH 23:00 AM 010-STP STOOPS 04/24/2025 Comments1: BATCH REPORT RECEIVED BC _____ PM 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250190 2661 GOULD CT 64 04/01/2025 Comments1: GINA- 630-400-9529 BC _____ PM 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/08/2025 Comments1: GINA - 630-400-9529 BC 23:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250191 2704 BERRYWOOD LN 771 04/17/2025 Comments1: TONY BC 13:00 PM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250192 420 MONTERERY ST 2022 04/24/2025 Comments1: VIC DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 29 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 29 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250193 3360 SEELEY ST 725 04/02/2025 Comments1: VICTOR 630-788-1934 BC 11:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250194 1011 S MAIN ST 04/04/2025 Comments1: JOSE 331-257-1401 BC 23:00 AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250196 3174 JUSTICE DR 603 04/17/2025 Comments1: VICTOR - 630-788-1934 BC _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250197 2455 WYTHE PL 8 04/28/2025 Comments1: CARRIE 6308442553 X 103 GH 23:00 AM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250199 1071 GILLESPIE LN 212 04/25/2025 Comments1: OCTAVIO - 224-303-7349 GH 22:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250201 447 E BARBERRY CIR 151 04/24/2025 Comments1: MARTHA 815-786-3100 GH _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250203 3201 MATLOCK DR 1011 04/08/2025 Comments1: JESUS 630-453-9281 GH _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/11/2025 Comments1: JEFF 630-330-6705 PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/15/2025 Comments1: DRWEISS@DRHORTON.COM PR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/17/2025 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PBF _____ 005-WAT WATER 04/16/2025 BC _____ 006-BKF BACKFILL 04/21/2025 BC 23:00 AM 007-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/28/2025 Comments1: CHRIS GH _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250204 3203 MATLOCK DR 1012 04/08/2025 Comments1: JESUS 630-453-9281 GH _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/11/2025 Comments1: JEFF 630-330-6705 PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/15/2025 Comments1: DRWEISS@DRHORTON.COM PR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/17/2025 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 30 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 30 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PBF _____ 005-WAT WATER 04/16/2025 BC _____ 006-BKF BACKFILL 04/21/2025 BC 23:00 AM 007-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/28/2025 GH _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250205 3205 MATLOCK DR 1013 04/08/2025 Comments1: JESUS 630-453-9281 GH _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/11/2025 Comments1: JEFF 630-330-6705 PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/15/2025 Comments1: DRWEISS@DRHORTON.COM PR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/17/2025 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PBF _____ 005-WAT WATER 04/16/2025 BC 23:00 AM 006-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/28/2025 GH _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250206 3207 MATLOCK DR 1014 04/08/2025 Comments1: JESUS 630-453-9281 GH _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/11/2025 Comments1: JEFF 630-330-6705 PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/15/2025 Comments1: DRWEISS@DRHORTON.COM PR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/17/2025 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PBF _____ 005-WAT WATER 04/16/2025 BC _____ 006-BKF BACKFILL 04/21/2025 BC 23:00 AM 007-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/28/2025 GH _____ AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250207 3209 MATLOCK DR 1015 04/08/2025 Comments1: JESUS 630-453-9281 GH _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/11/2025 Comments1: JEFF 630-330-6705 PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/15/2025 Comments1: DRWEISS@DRHORTON.COM DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 31 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 31 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/17/2025 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PBF _____ 005-WAT WATER 04/16/2025 BC _____ 006-BKF BACKFILL 04/21/2025 BC 23:00 AM 007-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/28/2025 PR _____ AM 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20250208 1435 CANNONBALL TR 0 04/08/2025 Comments1: MIKE WILLIAMS PR 23:00 AM 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/25/2025 Comments1: MIKE PR 23:00 AM 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/25/2025 PR 23:00 AM 004-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/25/2025 PR 23:00 AM 005-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/25/2025 GH 23:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250209 3035 GRANDE TR 530 04/15/2025 Comments1: JACKIE 708-316-9740 GH _____ PM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250211 3358 JONATHAN DR 152 04/14/2025 Comments1: VICTOR 630-788-1934 PR 23:00 AM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250215 2903 CRYDER WAY 470 04/29/2025 Comments1: REMY PR 23:00 AM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/29/2025 PR 23:00 AM 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/29/2025 PR 23:00 AM 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/29/2025 PR _____ 005-INS INSULATION 04/29/2025 BC 23:00 AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250216 3168 JUSTICE DR 604 04/23/2025 Comments1: DAVID; 773-510-8151 GH 11:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250217 2201 IROQUOIS LN 19 04/04/2025 Comments1: JACKIE 708-316-9740 GH 10:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250218 4459 TAMPA DR 1964 04/08/2025 Comments1: JANICE - 630-373-0083 PR 23:00 AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250219 3056 CONSTITUTION WAY 583 04/29/2025 Comments1: SALINAS: 630-293-4962 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 32 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 32 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH 22:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250220 2655 SEELEY ST 822 04/17/2025 Comments1: TINA 815-836-8731 BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250227 3111 JETER CT 504 04/23/2025 Comments1: DECK -- JAME 224-200-6534 BC 23:00 AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250231 403 WEST ST 0 04/22/2025 Comments1: DECK - MATT - 630-639-7502 BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250233 3367 JONATHAN DR 163 04/23/2025 Comments1: PAVER PATIO GH 12:30 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250234 534 KELLY AVE 159 04/03/2025 Comments1: DANIEL 786-370-9053 GH 11:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250235 3048 CONSTITUTION WAY 582 04/10/2025 Comments1: TINA 815-836-8731 GH _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/15/2025 Comments1: FENCE GH _____ AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250239 3392 CALEDONIA DR 179 04/08/2025 Comments1: JESUS - 224-497-0217 BC _____ PM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250240 2721 BERRYWOOD LN 778 04/11/2025 Comments1: VICTOR 630-788-1934 BC 13:00 PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250241 2864 CRYDER WAY 444 04/22/2025 Comments1: MW GH _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/24/2025 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/29/2025 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM GH 13:00 PM 004-BKF BACKFILL 04/30/2025 Comments1: MW BC 23:00 AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250242 575 YELLOWSTONE LN 0 04/29/2025 Comments1: NICOLE 630-765-0636 BC _____ AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250243 2195 NORTHLAND LN 95 04/09/2025 Comments1: TRAVIS BC _____ AM 002-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/09/2025 Comments1: CONCRETE PAD DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 33 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 33 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC 13:00 PM 001-BND POOL BONDING 20250246 752 GREENFIELD TURN 104 04/17/2025 Comments1: EARLY PM BC 13:00 PM 002-TRN TRENCH - (GAS, ELECTRIC, 04/17/2025 BC 13:00 PM 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20250247 844 CANYON TR 109 04/24/2025 Comments1: CHRIS -- UPPER DECK GH _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250248 511 BUCKTHORN CT 77 04/30/2025 Comments1: WINDOWS BC 23:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250250 303 W RIDGE ST 2 04/25/2025 Comments1: GABRIEL 630-215-8225 GH 10:30 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250253 2295 HOBBS LN 157 04/11/2025 Comments1: JOHN 630-881-7106 BC 13:00 PM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250254 511 BISCAYNE CT 2008 04/25/2025 Comments1: TINA: 815-836-8731 GH 23:00 AM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250255 207 JACKSON ST 0 04/22/2025 Comments1: CLASSIC FENCE - 630-551-3400 PR 14:00 001-SEW SEWER INSPECTION 20250257 307 E RIDGE ST 4 04/04/2025 Comments1: 630-553-7592 - GH 23:00 AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20250258 842 TIMBER OAK LN 54 04/23/2025 Comments1: MW APPROVED AS NOTED BC 23:00 AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/29/2025 Comments1: MW BC 12:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250261 3989 SHOEGER DR 39 04/25/2025 Comments1: ARISSA 708-316-9740 GH 23:00 AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250268 1141 GILLESPIE LN 307 04/23/2025 Comments1: JOHN - 630-862-8053 PASSED AS NOTED BC 23:00 AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250269 310 ILLINI DR 0 04/17/2025 Comments1: GUS 331-717-8254 BC 13:00 PM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20250271 3078 CONSTITUTION WAY 587 04/30/2025 Comments1: ORALIA 630-605-7449 GH 23:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250276 1101 S MAIN ST 0 04/16/2025 Comments1: JOE PARTIAL - FRONT AND RIGHT SIDE GH 23:00 002-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 04/17/2025 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 34 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 34 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH 13:30 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250279 305 MILL ST. 04/08/2025 BC 13:00 PM 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20250281 365 TIMBER OAK LN 33 04/15/2025 Comments1: UNILOCK RETAIN WALL -- MIKE 630-715-1132 BC 13:00 PM 002-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/22/2025 Comments1: GRAVEL BASE - PAVER PATIO - MIKE 630-715 Comments2: -1132 BC 13:00 PM 003-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/24/2025 Comments1: MIKE - 630-715-1132 BC 13:00 PM 004-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/29/2025 Comments1: MIKE 630-715-1132 BC 12:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250293 159 CLAREMONT CT 04/11/2025 Comments1: REUBEN GH 23:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250295 407 COLTON ST 0 04/24/2025 Comments1: CLASSIC BC 23:00 AM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250296 665 TIMBER OAK LN 20 04/25/2025 BC 13:00 PM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250298 1833 ASTER DR 0 04/23/2025 Comments1: classic BC 13:00 PM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250299 943 HAYDEN DR 123 04/23/2025 Comments1: MIGUEL 815-570-7026 BC 13:00 PM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/28/2025 Comments1: Michelle: 630-309-1156 -- GATES DO NOT S Comments2: ELF CLOSE OR LATCH. REQUIRED AS SWIMMIN Comments3: G POOL GUARD ADJUST SPRINGS. BC 23:00 AM 001-PH POST HOLES / PILES 20250300 1052 HOMESTEAD DR 0 04/15/2025 Comments1: JEREMY: 630-640-4824 GH 23:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250308 3393 CALEDONIA DR 187 04/29/2025 Comments1: JAZLYN 224-220-1042 PR _____ PM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250314 310 E VAN EMMON ST 0 04/30/2025 Comments1: TYLER 630-818-5505 PR _____ PM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/30/2025 PR _____ PM 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/30/2025 PR _____ PM 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/30/2025 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 35 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 35 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GH 22:00 002-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250323 2049 SQUIRE CIR 210 04/30/2025 Comments1: CLASSIC BC 23:00 AM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250342 2668 LILAC WAY 378 04/29/2025 Comments1: HOLES 31" DEEP, MIN IS 36" GH _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250348 405 WEST ST 0 04/23/2025 Comments1: JOE - 630-385-3929 GH 22:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250349 1528 SIENNA DR 77 04/28/2025 Comments1: DEBORAH 815-744-9390 PR _____ 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250355 1332 CLEARWATER DR 252 04/28/2025 PR _____ 002-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/28/2025 PR _____ 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/28/2025 PR _____ 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/28/2025 PR _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250358 908 GAME FARM RD 0 04/17/2025 GH 23:00 AM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250363 2632 MCLELLAN BLVD 0 04/25/2025 Comments1: PATRICE - 6308559297 GH 23:00 AM 002-REI REINSPECTION 04/28/2025 Comments1: PATRICE 630-855-9297 -- 2 ROWS GH 13:00 PM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20250387 451 WINDETT RIDGE RD 62 04/28/2025 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 36 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 36 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: ADD ADDITION 2 AGP ABOVE-GROUND POOL 2 BDO COMMERCIAL BUILD-OUT 4 BSM BASEMENT REMODEL 30 COM COMMERCIAL BUILDING 8 CON CONCRETE PAD 1 CRM COMMERCIAL REMODEL 13 DCK DECK 6 ESS BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS 3 FNC FENCE 36 IGP IN-GROUND POOL 7 MF MULTI-FAMILY (APARTMENT/CONDO) 29 MSC MISCELLANEOUS 4 PTO PATIO / PAVERS 27 REM REMODEL 11 REP REPAIR 4 ROF ROOFING 17 RPZ RPZ - BACKFLOW PREVENTION 1 SFA SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED 136 SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 260 SGN SIGN 2 SHD SHED/ACCESSORY BUILDING 1 SLF SOLAR FARM 2 SOL SOLAR PANELS 2 TNT TEMPORARY TENT 1 WIN WINDOW REPLACEMENT 2 INSPECTION SUMMARY: ADA ADA ACCESSIBLE WALK WAY 1 BG BASEMENT AND GARAGE FLOOR 2 BKF BACKFILL 22 BND POOL BONDING 3 BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 11 EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 19 ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 18 ELU ELECTRICAL - UNDERSLAB 1 ESW SEWER / WATER 1 FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 14 FIN FINAL INSPECTION 41 FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 12 FOU FOUNDATION 25 FTG FOOTING 28 GAR GARAGE FLOOR 32 GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 7 INS INSULATION 21 MIS MISCELLANEOUS 3 PH POST HOLES / PILES 1 PHD POST HOLE - DECK 2 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 37 DATE: 05/01/2025 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 37 TIME: 09:51:02 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2025 TO 04/30/2025 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 23 PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READY 13 PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 23 PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 35 PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 28 PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20 REI REINSPECTION 16 REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 33 RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SFD SFA 35 RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 31 ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & WATER 16 SEW SEWER INSPECTION 1 STP STOOPS 13 TRN TRENCH - (GAS, ELECTRIC, ETC) 2 UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 6 WAT WATER 26 WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 26 INSPECTOR SUMMARY: BC BOB CREADEUR 155 BF B&F INSPECTOR CODE SERVICE 6 GH GINA HASTINGS 273 GS GEORGE STEFFENS 22 PBF PLUMBER 65 PR PETER RATOS 90 STATUS SUMMARY: A PR 4 C BC 19 C GH 28 C GS 4 C PR 4 I BC 136 I BF 6 I GH 213 I GS 5 I PBF 60 I PR 81 T GH 32 T GS 13 T PBF 5 T PR 1 REPORT SUMMARY: 611 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Purchasing Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #3 Tracking Number EDC 2025-38 Property Maintenance Reports for March and April 2025 Economic Development Committee – June 3, 2025 Informational None Please see the attached memos. Pete Ratos Community Development Name Department Page | 1 Property Maintenance Report March 2025 No property maintenance cases were heard in March 2025. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Pete Ratos, Code Official CC: Bart Olson, Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Jori Behland Date April 1, 2025 Subject: March Property Maintenance Page: 1 of 2 Case Report 03/01/2025 - 03/31/2025 Case # Case Date ADDRESS OF COMPLAINT TYPE OF VIOLATION STATUS VIOLATION LETTER SENT FOLLOW UP STATUS CITATION ISSUED DATE OF HEARING POSTED FINDINGS PUBLIC WORKS TO MOW 20250018 3/31/2025 622 Windett Ridge Rd Commencing Work without a Permit TO BE INSPECTED 20250017 3/31/2025 1124 Western Ln Chickens Not Contained in Fenced Area TO BE INSPECTED 20250016 3/19/2025 2575 Overlook Ct Commencing work without a Permit IN VIOLATION 20250015 3/18/2025 2601 Fairfax Way Commencing Work W/O Permit IN VIOLATION 20250014 3/12/2025 506 W Hydraulic Ave Junk, Trash & Refuse IN VIOLATION 20250013 3/7/2025 102 Worsley St Occupancy in non-residential structure TO BE INSPECTED Page: 2 of 2 20250012 3/5/2025 506 W Hydraulic Ave Junk, Trash & Refuse CLOSED 3/5/2025 COMPLIANT 20250011 3/4/2025 2721 Berrywood Ln Working without a Permit CLOSED 20250010 3/3/2025 1172 Hawk Hollow MetroNet Damage Installing Cable CLOSED 20250009 3/3/2025 106 E Park St Chickens Not Contained in Fenced Area PENDING Total Records: 10 4/1/2025 Page | 1 Property Maintenance Report April 2025 No property maintenance cases were heard in April 2025. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Pete Ratos, Code Official CC: Bart Olson, Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Jori Behland Date May 1, 2025 Subject: April Property Maintenance Page: 1 of 1 Case Report 04/01/2025 - 04/30/2025 Case # Case Date ADDRESS OF COMPLAINT TYPE OF VIOLATION STATUS VIOLATION LETTER SENT FOLLOW UP STATUS CITATION ISSUED DATE OF HEARING POSTED FINDINGS PUBLIC WORKS TO MOW 20250025 4/28/2025 ENTRANCE TO SUBDISION ON CORNEILS RD DUMPING BUILDING WASTE COMPLIANT IN VIOLATION 20250024 4/28/2025 555 Bluestem Grass/Weeds Height IN VIOLATION IN VIOLATION 4/29/2025 IN VIOLATION 20250023 4/28/2025 1954 Coneflower Ct Trailer Parked on Street CLOSED COMPLIANT 20250022 4/24/2025 2048 Squire Cir Working without a Permit TO BE INSPECTED 20250021 4/22/2025 204 Center Pkwy House in Disrepair/Uninhabitable CLOSED COMPLIANT 20250020 4/15/2025 McLellan Blvd Construction Debris CLOSED 20250019 4/14/2025 444 E Veterans Pkwy Fallen Tree CLOSED COMPLIANT Total Records: 7 5/1/2025 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Purchasing Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #4 Tracking Number EDC 2025-39 Economic Development Reports for April and May 2025 Economic Development Committee – June 3, 2025 Informational None Bart Olson Administration Name Department 651 Prairie Pointe Drive • Yorkville, Illinois • 60560 Phone 630-209-7151 Monthly Report – May 2025 EDC Meeting - The United City of Yorkville April 2025 Activity New Development: - We Rock the Spectrum Kid’s Gym – 1435 Cannonball Trail – Courthouse Square: Amy and James Allen, owners of We Rock the Spectrum in Shorewood, are opening a new location in Courthouse Square at 1435 Cannonball Trail. This 5476 square foot space has been vacant since Dollar General closed. We Rock the Spectrum Kid’s Gym is a franchised play space that caters to families with children of all abilities, with special considerations for those with sensory processing disorders, and provides a space with specially designed sensory play equipment to allow individuals of all ability levels to play and grow together. More information about their inclusive philosophy can be found on their website at https://werockthespectrumshorewood.com/ . Opening is planned for July 2025. - Bowlero/Raging Waves Waterpark – 4000 N Bridge St: Raging Waves Waterpark plans to open for their 2025 season on May 24, 2025. Attached you will find an itemized list of facility enhancements provided by Dawn Witt that were made to the waterpark during the 2024-2025 off-season. See attachment. - America’s Best – 935 Erica Ln – Kendall Marketplace: National retailer America’s Best will occupy the 4315 square foot space at 935 Erica Ln in Kendall Marketplace. America’s Best has over 1000 locations across 31 states. The brand continues to grow as a trusted provider of quality eye care and eyewear, with a focus on affordability. This space has been vacant since Design 99 retail store closed and is currently undergoing renovations to create two general consultation rooms and one contact fitting space, along with a generous display area for designer frames. The target opening for America’s Best is July 18th, 2025. - Dhuse Chiropractic – 1625 Wing Rd: Yorkville’s own Dr. Kyle Dhuse is relocating his chiropractic office, Dhuse Chiropractic, to the approximately 1500 square foot location at 1625 Wing Rd. Dr. Dhuse is proud to serve the community he grew up in and the surrounding area by providing convenient and affordable chiropractic care. Dr. Dhuse's practice focuses on treatments that emphasize rehabilitation and exercise, specializing in the care of patients ranging from adolescents to the elderly. He is planning to open at the new location in July 2025. - Reds Sports Training Facility – 801 Prairie Pointe Dr: The Reds Baseball & Softball Academy is proud to announce the launch of its groundbreaking 21,000 sq ft. Reds Sports Training Facility, a game-changer for the Yorkville, IL community. As the first of its kind in the area, this state-of-the-art facility will offer comprehensive training and development programs for athletes aged 8U to 18U. By equipping young athletes with the skills and resources needed to excel, the facility is poised to have a lasting positive impact on the community. It aims to elevate the performance of both baseball & softball high school teams, fostering both individual and team success. Additionally, the facility will offer public programs like coaching and player clinics, winter programs, cage & turf rentals, and more. The new training center will not only nurture athletic talent but also instill values of dedication, teamwork, and discipline, creating a legacy of excellence for generations to come. Anticipated opening is in Fall 2025. - Elase Med Spa – 942 N Bridge St – Walnut Plaza: Images Med Spa is rebranding to Elase Med Spa in June of 2025. This will be the first Illinois location for the brand, which currently has 16 locations: 10 in Florida, 5 in Utah, and 1 in Idaho. They will continue to provide the community with a wide variety of top-notch skincare services and aesthetic treatments. - Precision Response Solutions – 1211 Deer St, Unit A: Precision Response Solutions (PRS) is a fire recovery and investigation assistance service that is run by a team of industry veterans, including Yorkville’s own Patrick Winninger. PRS offers emergency support for fire departments and investigators, government agencies, insurance companies, and homeowners through emergency shoring, demolition, and structural stabilization. The PRS team provides additional support through evidence management and investigation. PRS opened in the 5,000 square foot space on April 1, 2025. - Moon Phaze Boutique – 664 W Veterans Pkwy, Unit F – Cannonball Run: Owner Amanda Brickey began Moon Phaze Boutique as a small booth specializing in metaphysical goods and alternative fashion inside True North Antique Mall in Morris in 2021. Due to the ongoing success of her business and driven by a passion for entrepreneurship, Amanda expanded Moon Phaze into a full- scale 1,800 square foot location at 664 W Veterans Parkway. Moon Phaze Boutique opened on April 26th, 2025. April 2025 Previously Reported Updates: - Salsa Verde – 1508 N Bridge St: Yorkville’s own Arechiga Family is relocating and expanding their Salsa Verde Restaurant to the former Arby’s location on Route 47. The new space is approximately 3,200 square feet and includes a drive-up. Their original location is 1,800 square feet. Salsa Verde prides itself in redefining the concept of modern, fast-casual food by proudly serving delicious dishes prepared from authentic Mexican recipes in a friendly, vibrant environment. They hope to be open in the new location in May of 2025. - Blank SL8 – 219 S Bridge St: The former FRET Wine Bar & Theatre has changed ownership and has reopened as a new concept special event space called Blank SL8. New business owners Earl Holmes and his wife Stephanie (Stef) of Oswego opened on April 19, 2025, at 219 S Bridge St, in Downtown Yorkville. Blank SL8 is an intimate venue for hosting small to medium-sized special events, including birthday parties, corporate events, bridal and wedding showers, etc. Clients bring in their own vendors for services such as photography and food to make each event unique and affordable. The Chamber Ribbon Cutting and Grand Opening are planned for May 22nd, 2025. - JEMS2 Property Management – 904 S. Bridge St: Yorkville resident Michael Holzer is constructing a new building at 904 S. Bridge St. Once complete, the new 2100 square foot building will house the Brenda Holzer Memorial Foundation and will look to open late 2025. Additional information about the foundation can be found by visiting their website at www.bhmemorialfoundation.org. - Nothing Bundt Cakes – 731 Erica Ln – Kendall Marketplace: Faisal Raja will be opening his ninth Nothing Bundt Cakes location in Kendall Marketplace. Taking over the 2250 square foot former Kendall Meat Company location at 731 Erica Ln, Nothing Bundt Cakes will offer your favorite bundt cake treats baked in-house, on-site. Faisal and his team have already partnered with Yorkville schools in the past to collaborate on fundraisers, and they are excited to continue to support the Yorkville Community from this new location. Opening date is planned for Summer of 2025. - Complete Medical Recovery (CMR) – 129 Commercial Drive, Unit 9 – Yorkville Business Center: Dr. Eric Andersen is leading an outstanding group of medical providers, in a relocation and expansion for their businesses. This group currently practices at 1949 S Bridge Street (Fountain Village Center) in 2,300 square feet of space. They purchased their new 12,300 square foot, two- story space on January 6, 2025. There will be a 1,000 square foot fitness studio on the first floor that will open on March 15th; this is new to their practice. All of the medical providers will move into the new expanded location on May 5th, 2025. These include Walton Chiropractic, A Touch of Ginger, Complete Muscle Recovery, Complete Medical Recovery, Complete Mind Recovery and Complete Medical Radiance. They will also offer access to an infrared sauna, hyperbaric chamber, and a retail store for purchase of supplements. You can learn more amount this practice by visiting their website www.cmrhealthgroup.com - The District Salon Suites, A Collection of Industry Professionals – 201 W. Hydraulic: Katie Ash entrepreneur and owner of Salon Social in downtown Yorkville, is opening an additional new business in the former Yorkville Parks and Rec building. The Williams Group purchased this building from the City in September 2024. The District Salon Suites will occupy the nearly 4,000 square foot space, and plans to be open June 1st, 2025. The building will be a fully renovated facility with 15 luxury salon suites on site, which are currently 50% leased. The District will house stylists who have graduated from commission salons, have spent years building a clientele, and can now support self-employment. - Kharisma’s Kuddles – 104 E. Schoolhouse Rd: Kharisma Benard will open a daycare for children ages 2 to 6, and also offer before and after school care for elementary school children at this location. She is going through approvals with DCFS at this time and hopes to be open later this year. - Opal Banquets & New Hotel – 577 E Kendall Drive – Kendall Crossing: Hotel owner Sonny Shah has begun construction to complete his project at Kendall Crossing. The foundation for this building was made back in 2019. At this time, the plan includes a first-floor banquet center that will accommodate 450 guests, a small restaurant and bar that will be open to the public, a second-floor rooftop bar, and 4 additional floors of hotel rooms. The hotel “flag” is HYATT STUDIOS. This hotel type is a new offering for the “Hyatt” brand, and the first of these offerings will open in 2025 nationwide. The goal is an opening early 2026. - Children’s Courtyard – 708 E Veterans Parkway – Heartland Center: Children’s Courtyard is owned by the Learning Care Group, which is the second largest early education and childcare operator in the US. They have a total of 11 childcare center brands. Yorkville will be a Children’s Courtyard, which specializes in offering an active learning experience. This building was formerly The Heartland School. The new school will create 30 new jobs and serve approximately 170 students. The building received a complete interior renovation, adding state-of-the-art equipment and upgrading the playground. You can learn more by visiting their website https://www.childrenscourtyard.com. Director Jessica Wathen has scheduled the Grand Opening for May 16, 2025, from 3:30-6:30pm. The Grand Opening is open to the public and will have family activities including alpacas, face painting, Foxy’s Ice Cream truck, and more. They will be open for enrollment at that time. - QuikTrip – Located at the northeast corner of Routes 47 and 71: This is the new developer/business that has purchased this property. QuikTrip is new to Illinois, but NOT a new company. It is a privately held company that was founded in 1958 and is based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. QuikTrip has grown to more than an $11 billion company, with more than 900 stores in 14 states. They have over 24,000 employees nationwide. Construction began on February 17th, 2025. Opening for Yorkville’s QuikTrip is slotted for November 2025. - Continue working with a variety of other potential business owners. There are a variety of parties doing due diligence on space to lease and buildings, and land to purchase. Information will be forthcoming. Respectfully submitted, Lynn Dubajic Kellogg & Katelyn Gregory 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 lynn@dlkllc.com kgregory@yorkville.il.us 630-209-7151 630-800-0574 RAGING WAVES WATERPARK 2024-2025 Off-Season Updates and Improvements ATTRACTION UPDATES • A new LED video screen, will be added to the back wall of the Barrier Reef Wave Pool. Sports, movies, music videos and more will add excitement to your day as you enjoy the waves • More tubes and family rafts at multiple slides to help lines move faster • New special events throughout the season for families and adults PARK ENTRANCE UPDATES • More Guest Service windows for faster service • More bag check tables and ticket scanners for faster park entry • Shade structures are being added to the park entrance to keep our Guests comfortable PARK AMENITY ENHANCEMENTS • Multiple new VIP cabanas are being constructed, along with an exclusive cabana check- in counter • More lockers will be added across multiple locations • Lush, new landscaping and walkway improvements • New state-of-the-art audio system to boost sound quality and create a festive ambiance FOOD & BEVERAGE ENHANCEMENTS • Faster moving lines at Shark Bite Cafe and Hungry Croc thanks to larger order windows and behind-the-scenes improvements • New food & beverage offerings including gourmet popcorn and frozen cocktails • New, shaded group picnic pavilions with an adjacent volleyball/activities area will be added for catered groups of 50 to 500 plus Along with these improvements is a fresh update of paint everywhere – things are looking very fun! We will have all new point of sales systems throughout the park, this will be more current technology which in turn will be quicker for our guests and improve their experience, including at the parking booths. We will have much of the same management staff which will be great in keeping the values of Raging Waves and importance of family fun in the forefront of our business model. Our goal is to continue to be a great asset for the United City of Yorkville! 651 Prairie Pointe Drive • Yorkville, Illinois • 60560 Phone 630-209-7151 Monthly Report – June 2025 EDC Meeting - The United City of Yorkville May 2025 Activity New Development: - Home Run Hot Dogs & Lemonade – 109 N Bridge St – Riverside Plaza: Family-owned and operated, Home Run Hot Dogs & Lemonade is taking over the 748 square foot space at Riverside Plaza, formerly Iconic Coffee. This will be their first brick-and- mortar location, boasting a Wrigley Field-themed interior and a menu lineup of Vienna Beef hot dogs, burgers, Polish Sausage and Italian beef, and fresh-squeezed lemonade. Renovations are also set to include a pass-through window to allow patrons to order and enjoy their meal from inside Fox Republic Brewing. Owner Joseph Orto and his family opened Home Run Hot Dogs & Lemonade in February of 2021. The Ortos have a current location inside the concession stand at Blackberry Farm in Aurora and operated previous temporary locations at several local antique markets, Stuart’s Sports Complex, and the Batavia Boardwalk shops in 2024. Look for Home Run Hot Dogs & Lemonade to open in Summer 2025. - Italian Soda House – 600 E Veterans Pkwy: Owners Michael LaPidus and Robert Taft are bringing a taste of Italy to Yorkville. The 5476 square foot space, formerly Silver Fox, is undergoing an ambitious transformation that will surprise and delight diners with a unique experience. With an atmosphere full of charm and a little whimsy, the Italian Soda House will be a jewel in Yorkville’s blossoming boutique restaurant scene. Italian Soda House will feature a menu filled with classic Italian favorites and adventurous new offerings made from fresh, high-end ingredients, authentic gelato, and an Italian soda bar. Target opening is Summer 2025. - Subway – 1207 N Bridge St: Yorkville Subway received a full cosmetic refresh to the 1500 square foot location on Route 47, to reflect the brand’s new, modern style. Business owner Hetal Surati is excited for patrons to enjoy the brighter interior, new digital menu boards, and modern feel to the space. Hetal purchased the Yorkville location in March of 2023 and owns 5 additional locations. Following a week of closure for remodeling, Subway is now open and will be hosting a customer appreciation day on June 6th, 2025, where customers can enjoy a buy one, get one free deal on 6-inch and footlong sandwiches. May 2025 Previously Reported Updates: - We Rock the Spectrum Kid’s Gym – 1435 Cannonball Trail – Courthouse Square: Amy and James Allen, owners of We Rock the Spectrum in Shorewood, are opening a new location in Courthouse Square at 1435 Cannonball Trail. This 5476 square foot space has been vacant since Dollar General closed. We Rock the Spectrum Kid’s Gym is a franchised play space that caters to families with children of all abilities, with special considerations for those with sensory processing disorders, and provides a space with specially designed sensory play equipment to allow individuals of all ability levels to play and grow together. More information about their inclusive philosophy can be found on their website at https://www.werockthespectrumyorkville.com/. Opening is planned for July 2025. - America’s Best – 935 Erica Ln – Kendall Marketplace: National retailer America’s Best will occupy the 4315 square foot space at 935 Erica Ln in Kendall Marketplace. America’s Best has over 1000 locations across 31 states. The brand continues to grow as a trusted provider of quality eye care and eyewear, with a focus on affordability. This space has been vacant since Dots retail store closed and is currently undergoing renovations to create two general consultation rooms and one contact fitting space, along with a generous display area for designer frames. The target opening for America’s Best is July 2025. - Dhuse Chiropractic – 1625 Wing Rd: Yorkville’s own Dr. Kyle Dhuse is relocating his chiropractic office, Dhuse Chiropractic, to the approximately 1500 square foot location at 1625 Wing Rd. Dr. Dhuse is proud to serve the community he grew up in and the surrounding area by providing convenient and affordable chiropractic care. Dr. Dhuse's practice focuses on treatments that emphasize rehabilitation and exercise, specializing in the care of patients ranging from adolescents to the elderly. He is planning to open at the new location in July 2025. - Reds Sports Training Facility – 801 Prairie Pointe Dr: The Reds Baseball & Softball Academy is proud to announce the launch of its groundbreaking 21,000 square foot Reds Sports Training Facility, a game-changer for the Yorkville, IL community. As the first of its kind in the area, this state-of-the-art facility will offer comprehensive training and development programs for athletes aged 8U to 18U. By equipping young athletes with the skills and resources needed to excel, the facility is poised to have a lasting positive impact on the community. It aims to elevate the performance of both baseball & softball high school teams, fostering both individual and team success. Additionally, the facility will offer public programs like coaching and player clinics, winter programs, cage & turf rentals, and more. The new training center will not only nurture athletic talent but also instill values of dedication, teamwork, and discipline, creating a legacy of excellence for generations to come. Anticipated opening is in Fall 2025. - Salsa Verde – 1508 N Bridge St: Yorkville’s own Arechiga Family is relocating and expanding their Salsa Verde Restaurant to the former Arby’s location on Route 47. The new space is approximately 3,200 square feet and includes a drive-up. Their original location is 1,800 square feet. Salsa Verde prides itself in redefining the concept of modern, fast-casual food by proudly serving delicious dishes prepared from authentic Mexican recipes in a friendly, vibrant environment. They hope to be open in the new location in Summer 2025. - JEMS2 Property Management – 904 S. Bridge St: Yorkville resident Michael Holzer is constructing a new building at 904 S. Bridge St. Once complete, the new 2100 square foot building will house the Brenda Holzer Memorial Foundation and will look to open late 2025. Additional information about the foundation can be found by visiting their website at www.bhmemorialfoundation.org. - Nothing Bundt Cakes – 731 Erica Ln – Kendall Marketplace: Faisal Raja will be opening his ninth Nothing Bundt Cakes location in Kendall Marketplace. Taking over the 2250 square foot former Kendall Meat Company location at 731 Erica Ln, Nothing Bundt Cakes will offer your favorite bundt cake treats baked in-house, on-site. Faisal and his team have already partnered with Yorkville schools in the past to collaborate on fundraisers, and they are excited to continue to support the Yorkville Community from this new location. Opening date is planned for Summer of 2025. - Complete Medical Recovery (CMR) – 129 Commercial Drive, Unit 9 – Yorkville Business Center: Dr. Eric Andersen is leading an outstanding group of medical providers in a relocation and expansion for their businesses. This group currently practices at 1949 S Bridge Street (Fountain Village Center) in 2,300 square feet of space. They purchased their new 12,300 square foot, two-story space on January 6, 2025. There is a 1,000 square foot fitness studio on the first floor that opened on March 15th; this is new to their practice. All of the medical providers moved into the new expanded location on May 5th, 2025. These include Walton Chiropractic, A Touch of Ginger, Complete Muscle Recovery, Complete Medical Recovery, Complete Mind Recovery, and Complete Medical Radiance. They will also offer access to an infrared sauna, hyperbaric chamber, and a retail store for the purchase of supplements. You can learn more about this practice by visiting their website www.cmrhealthgroup.com - The District Salon Suites, A Collection of Industry Professionals – 201 W. Hydraulic: Katie Ash, entrepreneur and owner of Salon Social in downtown Yorkville, is opening an additional new business in the former Yorkville Parks and Rec building. The Williams Group purchased this building from the City in September 2024. The District Salon Suites will occupy the nearly 4,000 square foot space and plans to open on June 1st, 2025. The building will be a fully renovated facility with 15 luxury salon suites, currently 50% leased on-site. The District will house stylists who have graduated from commission salons, have spent years building a clientele, and can now support self-employment. - Kharisma’s Kuddles – 104 E. Schoolhouse Rd: Kharisma Benard will open a daycare for children ages 2 to 6, and also offer before and after-school care for elementary school children at this location. She is going through approvals with DCFS at this time and hopes to be open later this year. - Opal Banquets & New Hotel – 577 E Kendall Drive – Kendall Crossing: Hotel owner Sonny Shah has begun construction to complete his project at Kendall Crossing. The foundation for this building was laid back in 2019. At this time, the plan includes a first-floor banquet center that will accommodate 450 guests, a small restaurant and bar that will be open to the public, a second- floor rooftop bar, and 4 additional floors of hotel rooms. The hotel “flag” is HYATT STUDIOS. This hotel type is a new offering for the “Hyatt” brand, and the first of these offerings will open in 2025 nationwide. The goal is an opening in early 2026. - Children’s Courtyard – 708 E Veterans Parkway – Heartland Center: Children’s Courtyard is owned by the Learning Care Group, which is the second largest early education and childcare operator in the US. They have a total of 11 childcare center brands. Yorkville will be a Children’s Courtyard, which specializes in offering an active learning experience. This building was formerly The Heartland School. The new school will create 30 new jobs and serve approximately 170 students. The building received a complete interior renovation, adding state-of-the-art equipment and upgrading the playground. You can learn more by visiting their website https://www.childrenscourtyard.com. Director Jessica Wathen hosted their Grand Opening on May 16, 2025. - QuikTrip – Located at the northeast corner of Routes 47 and 71: This is the new developer/business that has purchased this property. QuikTrip is new to Illinois, but NOT a new company. It is a privately held company that was founded in 1958 and is based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. QuikTrip has grown to more than an $11 billion company, with more than 900 stores in 14 states. They have over 24,000 employees nationwide. Construction began on February 17th, 2025. Opening for Yorkville’s QuikTrip is slotted for November 2025. - Continue working with a variety of other potential business owners. There are a variety of parties doing due diligence on space to lease and buildings, and land to purchase. Information will be forthcoming. Respectfully submitted, Lynn Dubajic Kellogg & Katelyn Gregory 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 lynn@dlkllc.com, kgregory@yorkville.il.us 630-209-7151 630-800-0574 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memorandum. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Purchasing Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #5 Tracking Number EDC 2025-40 Project Steel (Prologis) – Annexation, Rezone, PUD & Preliminary Plan Economic Development Committee – June 3, 2025 Majority Approval Requests for annexation, rezoning, Planned Unit Development (PUD), and Preliminary PUD Plan for an approx. 540-acre data center campus. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department 1 REQUEST SUMMARY: Prologis, L.P., as the petitioner and contract purchaser, along with property owners Rosenwinkel Family Trust, George Ostreko Jr. Et Al, Mary Auer, and Jerry G. and Marilee Foltz, is seeking approval to annex sixteen (16) parcels totaling approximately 540 acres (the subject property) into the City. These parcels are proposed to be developed as part of a master-planned, high-tech data center campus. In addition to annexation, the petitioner is requesting rezoning of the property to the M-2 General Manufacturing District, special use approval for a Planned Unit Development (PUD), and approval of a preliminary PUD Plan. Originally planned with twenty-four (24) two-story data center building totalling over 9.5 million square feet, the revised data center campus has a phased development plan for eighteen (18) two-story buildings totaling approximately 6.8 million square feet with three (3) electrical substations, associated stormwater detention basins, equipment yards, and a request for the vacation of the W. Beecher Road right-of-way. Development is planned in three (3) phases, with each phase including six (6) data center buildings, one (1) substation, and three (3) stormwater basins. If approved, initial construction is anticipated to begin in the summer of 2027, with full campus buildout projected over a 20-year period. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Sara Mendez, Senior Planner David Hansen, Senior Planner Date: May 29, 2025 Subject: PZC 2025-07 Project Steel – Annex, Rezone, PUD & Prelim Plan Proposed Data Center Campus and On-Site Substation Development 2 PROPOSED ANNEXATION: The subject property area for the proposed data center campus is comprised of sixteen (16) unincorporated parcels totaling 540-acres, as detailed below: PIN ACRES OWNER JURISDICTION 02-06-300-011 142.82 ROSENWINKEL FAMILY TRUST ET AL 501 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-100-007 55.89 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-300-002 33.24 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-400-002 34.18 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-400-003 41.97 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-400-004 36.71 UNINCORPORATED 02-08-300-004 8.27 UNINCORPORATED 02-08-100-007 82.31 UNINCORPORATED 02-18-200-002 0.19 UNINCORPORATED 02-18-200-003 2.01 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-200-010 25.40 GEORGE JR OSTREKO ET AL UNINCORPORATED 02-07-200-001 1.24 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-200-008 52.30 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-100-008 9.89 MARY AUER UNINCORPORATED 02-06-400-005 12.48 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-200-009 1.01 JERRY G MARILEE FOLTZ UNINCORPORATED TOTAL 539.91 The petitioner is requesting annexation of all sixteen (16) parcels within the subject area, with a simultaneous request to rezone the property to the M-2 General Manufacturing District. Contiguity with the existing City of Yorkville corporate limits is established via adjacent properties, including the Hagemann and Bright Farms parcels to the west, Westbury South Village to the south, and the Bennett and Yorkville Renewables Solar Farm properties, along with Westbury East Village, to the east. An annexation agreement with the City will be required, and a plat of annexation will be included as an exhibit to the annexation ordinance, to be prepared by the City Engineer. Per Section 10-3-4 of the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), any territory annexed into the City is initially zoned R-1 Single-Family Suburban Residential. Accordingly, the petitioner is seeking to rezone the subject parcels directly to the M-2 District upon annexation. PROPOSED REZONING: As previously noted, the petitioner is seeking to rezone the subject property for the proposed data center campus to the M-2 General Manufacturing District. According to Table 10-3-12(B) of the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), both “data center” and “electric substation” are permitted uses within the M-2 District, with data centers classified as Energy Industrial Uses. The following are the current immediate surrounding zoning and land uses of the subject property which provides context for the existing development patterns in the area and helps assess the compatibility of the proposed use with adjacent properties and overall community planning objectives: Zoning Land Use North A-1 (Kendall County) M-1 Limited Manufacturing (Kendall County) M-3 Manufacturing Special Use (Kendall County) Galena Road (Rte. 30) Farmland Agricultural Earth Materials Extraction, Processing and Site Transportation Land Use 3 Petitioner has provided written responses to the Standards for Rezoning which will be entered into the record during the public hearing process. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD): Data centers are critical facilities that house computing systems and related hardware such as servers, data storage devices, and network infrastructure. They serve as the backbone for IT operations and provide the physical space necessary for storing and managing a company’s digital data. To ensure operational continuity, data center developments typically include backup power generators capable of maintaining service during electrical outages. In the City of Yorkville, Section 10-8-8 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) outlines the standards for Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), which allow for flexibility in zoning regulations provided that any proposed modifications are clearly identified, demonstrate compatibility with the surrounding area, are necessary for the effective development of the site, and meet at least one of the modification standards listed in Section 10-8-8(D). The proposed data center campus aligns with the following two (2) modification standards: Modification Standard #11, “Funding or Construction of Public Roadways,” by incorporating roadway improvements adjacent to the site that are consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the Kendall County Long-Range Transportation Plan, or other locally adopted transportation plans. Modification Standard #12, “Regional Utility Improvements,” as it includes the extension of public water and sanitary services through the site, enabling future connections by surrounding properties and creating opportunities for recapture payments to the developer. The petitioner has provided written responses addressing the special use and PUD standards, which will be entered into the record during the public hearing process. A detailed Planned Unit Development Agreement will also be prepared by the City Attorney to outline all conditions and provisions associated with the development of the data center campus. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN: The Project Steel site plan outlines a large-scale, master-planned data center campus development organized in a rectilinear grid layout across approximately 540 acres. The campus features eighteen (18) two-story data center buildings oriented generally in a horizontal direction and spaced strategically to East A-1 Agricultural (Kendall County) A-1 Agricultural Special Use (Kendall County) A-1 Agricultural Special Use (Yorkville) R-2 Single-Family Traditional District Beecher Road Farmland Farmland Farmland (Solar Farms) Farmland (Westbury East Village) Transportation Land Use South A-1 Agricultural District Special Use (Kendall County) M-1/M-2 Limited/General Manufacturing (Yorkville) R-4 General Multi-Family Residence District Commonwealth Edison – Transmission Station Corneils Road Camp Mutty Paws (Dog Kennel) Bright Farms Farmland (Westbury South Village) Utility Land Use Transportation Land Use West M-2 General Manufacturing District (Yorkville) M-1 Limited Manufacturing (Kendall County) A-1 Agricultural/R-1 District (Kendall County) Eldamain Road Farmland (Hagemann) Auto Repair (Jet’s Towing) Residential Land Use Transportation Land Use 4 allow secure and functional access between structures. There are also three (3) 15-acre substations, and eight (8) stormwater management basins placed throughout the site to support each phase of development. The layout includes designated interior parking areas placed away from external view of the adjacent roadways, all surrounded by security fencing. An approximately 84-acre area east of the proposed realignment of E. Beecher Road is reserved for future development and currently is not planned for data center buildings. The primary vehicular entryway access is primarily off Eldamain Road and Corneils Road accompanied by various emergency/secondary access points on Galena, E. Beecher, Eldamain and Corneils roads. These points of access will have guarded stations requiring extensive security verification before entry. Internal circulation is provided throughout the campus with a connecting roadway across the existing ComEd easement. Landscaped buffers are integrated for screening and enhanced plantings at each entryway is also provided. Residential restriction zones and proximity to nearest residential structures are also indicated on the proposed preliminary PUD site plan. The preliminary plan is considered an initial draft that outlines the petitioner's intended layout for a future final plat of subdivision, including all proposed site improvements. Typically, preliminary plans are valid for twelve (12) months. However, for Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), which are considered special uses, the approved plans expire only after three (3) years from approval if no Building Permit is issued and no portion of the property is final platted. PHASING OF DEVELOPMENT: The Preliminary PUD Plan for Project Steel outlines a defined phasing strategy to support a scalable and organized build-out of the data center campus. The development is divided into three (3) phases. Phase 1 includes six (6) data center buildings (#1–6) located in the northwest portion of the site, near the 5 intersection of the realigned E. Beecher Road and Corneils Road. This phase also includes three (3) stormwater ponds (#1–3), a ComEd substation with an associated detention pond, and related parking areas. Phase 2 features another six (6) buildings (#7–12), positioned in the southeast corner of the site at the intersection of Eldamain and Galena Roads. This phase includes two (2) stormwater ponds, a substation with surface detention, and associated parking. It also requires the vacation of the existing W. Beecher Road to accommodate the planned layout. Phase 3, the final stage, encompasses buildings #13– 18 situated in the central portion of the property. This phase includes three (3) additional stormwater ponds (#4–6), a ComEd substation and basin, and supporting parking areas. According to the developer, the full build-out of all three phases is expected to occur over a 20-year timeframe. This phased approach provides flexibility for the developer, allowing portions of the campus to become operational while additional phases are still under construction. It also enables the City to monitor and manage impacts more effectively as the site develops. According to Project Steel’s narrative, construction of the first phase is expected to begin in the summer of 2027. While the developer has expressed a willingness to proceed with development from west to east, the viability of this approach will largely depend on ongoing discussions with ComEd regarding power design and delivery, which will require further coordination moving forward. VACATION OF W. BEECHER ROAD As previously noted, the layout of the proposed data center campus will require the vacation of the existing W. Beecher Road. This approximately 5,000-foot stretch of two-lane rural roadway lies 0.5 miles east of Eldamain Road and intersects with Galena Road in the northwest quadrant of the proposed Project Steel development. The road curves east at a 90-degree angle for about 1,300 feet before terminating at a T-intersection with East Beecher Road. From there, it continues south as Beecher Road, ultimately intersecting with Corneils Road. This underutilized, unincorporated section of roadway is currently maintained by Bristol Township and provides access to three residential parcels owned by Jerry G. & Marilee Foltz, George Ostreko, and Mary Auer. All three property owners are parties to the development applications, and their homes will be demolished during construction (see map below). 6 Upon annexation of the subject parcels under Project Steel, jurisdiction over W. Beecher Road will transfer to the City of Yorkville. As such, the petitioner is requesting that the city vacate W. Beecher Road, allowing for its removal along with the residential structures mentioned above. The area will then be redeveloped with substations, retention ponds, data center buildings, and open space as part of the campus design. If the roadway is not vacated, Yorkville’s ordinance requires the improvement of W. Beecher Road to current city standards, at the cost of the developer. This would significantly impact the layout and developable area of the irregularly shaped site. It is also important to note that an approximately 18-acre parcel, located immediately east of W. Beecher Road and south of Galena Road, is proposed to contain above-ground water storage tanks as part of Project Cardinal's data center development. Although the current residential parcels will no longer require access to W. Beecher Road, consideration must be given to future access needs for the adjacent 18-acre parcel, which is under contract and planned for development as part of Project Cardinal. The request to vacate the roadway will require a separate public hearing process. Staff recommends advancing this request through the Public Works Committee and City Council meetings, only if the annexation, PUD, and preliminary PUD plan request are approved. REQUESTED PUD DEVIATIONS: The petitioner has listed thirteen (13) proposed deviations from the base M-2 General Manufacturing District standards as part of the PUD and Preliminary Plan. Upon staff review and analysis of the submitted plans, the following is a summary of staff’s recommendations: 1. Building Setbacks - Per the Table 10-3-9(A) Bulk and Dimensional Standards, the following compares current M-2 General Manufacturing District standards with the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) requested modifications (Deviation #1): BUILDING SETBACKS REQUIRED MINIMUM SETBACKS M-2 DISTRICT PROPOSED MINIMUM SETBACKS SITE PLAN (Phase 1) PROPOSED MINIMUM SETBACKS SITE PLAN (Phases 2-3) FRONT YARD (Eldamain Road & Beecher Road) 25’ 80’ 150’ INTERIOR SIDE/CORNER YARDS (North – Galena Road/South- Corneils Road) Min. 10% of lot/Max. 20’ 50’ 50’ REAR YARD (ComEd Right-of-Way) 0’ 50’ 50’ The petitioner is seeking to have the setbacks apply only to the boundary/perimeter of the subject property rather than each individual building on the site. Due to the irregularity of the subject property configuration, Eldamain Road and the proposed relocated E. Beecher Road are the established front yards, Galena and Corneils Roads are the interior side/corner yards, and the ComEd right-of-way is the established rear yard. The petitioner seeking a zero (0) foot building setback for all yards on future plats for buildings within the data center campus, as Section 10-8-6-C-6.c(6) of the Unified Development Ordinance requires building setback lines on all lots. Staff is supportive of this request but recommends a minimum 500-foot building separation from the nearest data center building or structure (primary or accessory) to the nearest residential or commercial structure. 7 2. Permitted Uses - Per Table 10-3-12 (B) of the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), “data center” and “electric substation” are permitted land uses in the M-2 General Manufacturing District. Data centers are defined as Energy Industrial Uses per Table 10-3-12(B) in the Unified Development Ordinance. Use standards for Energy Industrial Uses are reserved for future regulations, if ever approved, under Section 10-4-10 in the Unified Development Ordinance (Deviation #2). The petitioner is seeking waiver of future standards adopted being applicable to this subject property after adoption of the Planned Unit Development but has indicated the data center campus will not utilize battery storage related uses which are currently permitted in the M- 2 District. Staff recommends granting a lock on future regulations under this section of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for a period of twenty (20) years, provided the applicant agrees to all staff-recommended development standards outlined in this memorandum, which incorporate the proposed best practices, design guidelines, and operational requirements intended to ensure the least impactful and high-quality development across the data center campus. 3. Maximum Building Height - The M-2 District does not have a maximum building height per Table 10-3-9(A) in the Unified Development Ordinance. However, the petitioner has provided overall building heights for each proposed two-story data center building to top of building roof and top of rooftop equipment. The proposed buildings will not exceed 56.5 feet in height to the top of the structure and 70 feet to the top of the rooftop equipment. While the petitioner has stated rooftop equipment is needed in some areas, they will identify the proposed locations and screening measures on the plans, which will be presented to the City Council for approval. Staff recommends a maximum overall height for data center buildings within 1,500 feet of a residential structure shall be 70 feet. Additionally, no rooftop mechanical equipment will be allowed within this buffer, unless specifically approved by City Council. 4. Maximum Lot Coverage – Per Section 10-3-9(A) of the Unified Development Ordinance, the maximum lot coverage for the M-2 District (inclusive of sidewalks, parking areas and all impervious surfaces) is 85% of the gross lot area. According to the Site Data Table on the Preliminary PUD Plan, lot coverage calculations are provided as 60% in Phase 1 and 30% in Phases 2 and 3. 5. Parking Requirements - According to the Preliminary PUD Plan submitted, there are 1,368 total parking spaces and 27 accessible parking spaces to be provided on the property to accommodate the proposed eighteen (18) building data center campus and electric substation uses. However, the total minimum required parking for the subject property is 2,052 spaces, including 31 ADA accessible spaces. Additionally, per Section 10-5-1K-1 of the Unified Development Ordinance, the petitioner is required to install the infrastructure for a minimum of 41 electric vehicle charging stations and the petitioner proposes to install 30 electric vehicle charging stations (Deviation #3). See the table below: Location Sq. Ft. Provided Parking Spaces 0.2 Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. Parking Required 0.3 Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. Phase 1 Building 1 379,100 76 114 Building 2 379,100 76 114 Building 3 379,100 76 114 Building 4 379,100 76 114 Building 5 379,100 76 114 Building 6 379,100 76 114 Phase 2 8 Building 7 379,100 76 114 Building 8 379,100 76 114 Building 9 379,100 76 114 Building 10 379,100 76 114 Building 11 379,100 76 114 Building 12 379,100 76 114 Phase 3 Building 13 379,100 76 114 Building 14 379,100 76 114 Building 15 379,100 76 114 Building 16 379,100 76 114 Building 17 379,100 76 114 Building 18 379,100 76 114 TOTAL 6,823,800 1,368 2,052 The petitioner is requesting a variance from the UDO required 0.3 spaces per 1,000 to 0.2 spaces per 1,000. Staff is supportive of the requested deviation and recommends accepting a fee in lieu of the required electric vehicle (EV) charging station infrastructure for any stations not provided below the threshold of 41. The petitioner has indicated they will evaluate the feasibility of installing some or all of the required EV infrastructure on-site and will determine whether it is more cost-effective to proceed with installation or to pay the fee in lieu. Should the petitioner choose the fee-in-lieu option, the collected funds would be allocated toward the installation of EV charging stations in the downtown area or at other public facilities. 6. Vehicular Cross Access - Per Section 10-5-1-F of the Unified Development Ordinance, cross access between adjoining developments which minimizes access points along streets, encourages shared parking, and allows for vehicular access between land uses is required (Deviation #5). The site features a total of nine (9) access points, which includes three (3) primary drives – two from Cornelis Road and one from Eldamain Road. Additionally, there are three (3) identified emergency access drives – two on the proposed realigned E. Beecher Road and one on Galena Road. There is a singular proposed “unsecured access” point on Eldamain Road direct to Substation #2 and two additional direct access points to Substation #1 off Corneils Road. All access points connect to an internal 30-foot-wide looped roadway system, which provides circulation throughout the development, linking all 18 data center buildings, three (3) substations, and eight (8) stormwater basins. The petitioner also provided a Trip Generation Technical Memo prepared by Langan providing basic trip generation modeling for the originally proposed 24-building data center campus at full buildout. That preliminary report estimated a daily total of 1,440 trips. Due to the impracticality and security concerns of requiring the data center providing vehicular access to adjacent properties, the petitioner is seeking relief from providing cross access. Staff is supportive of this request, but further recommends an updated traffic study and a traffic management plan be required during construction, including a communication strategy and an on-site point of contact during construction. 7. Pedestrian Circulation - Per Section 10-5-1-N Pedestrian Circulation Standards of the Unified Development Ordinance required off-street parking areas to on-site pedestrian circulation systems and connection to existing and future planned trails (Deviation #6). The petitioner states that walkways between parking areas and building entrances will be provided on-site, however they seek a waiver for public access and connection to public sidewalks and bicycle trails due to the nature and security of the proposed land use. Staff is supportive of this request. In consideration of the requested waiver, staff recommends the 9 petitioner constructs and provides easements for a ten-foot (10’) multi-use walking trail on the outer perimeter of the proposed data center at the following locations: 1. Along E. Beecher Road from Corneils Road to Galena Road. 2. Along Eldamain Road to Galena Road. 3. Along Corneils Road to E. Beecher Road 8. Off-Street Loading - Per Section 10-5-1-Q of the Unified Development Ordinance, the number of off-street shall be determined on a case-by-case basis, and in the instance of special uses, loading berths adequate number and size to serve such use, as determined by the Zoning Administrators, shall be provided (Deviation #7). The petitioner requests a minimum of one (1) off-street loading space per data center campus building on the subject property. Staff is supportive of this request. 9. Landscaping - Section 10-5-3 establishes landscape standards for new developments. The following landscape requirements would apply to this development: building foundation landscaping, parking area perimeter landscaping, parking area interior landscaping, and transition zone landscaping (Deviation #8). The petitioner has submitted the following landscape plan and is seeking relief from all minimum landscaping requirements. The proposed concept landscape plan illustrates native and ornamental plantings strategically integrated throughout the site, including evergreen screening, ornamental shade trees, and deciduous shrubs. The plan also features regional trail connections and greenway buffers along the east side of the site adjacent to Rob Roy Creek. Landscaping is emphasized at gateway entries, around substations, and within interior parking areas. Finally, extensive perimeter landscaping buffers are proposed along all major roadways and adjacent property lines, including 10 Eldamain, Corneils, and Galena Roads, to visually screen the campus and soften the development’s visual impact. While staff is supportive of the requested deviation, as the petitioner has indicated a 100’ Transition Type D Zone Landscape Buffer surrounding the data center campus which includes a mix of shade, ornamental, and evergreen trees, staff further recommends an 8- foot-tall berm along the areas of the data center campus perimeter that abuts existing residential, such as the frontages along Corneils Road, E. Beecher Road, Eldamain Road, and Galena Road. The petitioner is still evaluating the feasibility of berms in certain areas and recognizes that the berm, landscaping, and building elevation discussions are all interrelated. 10. Mechanical Screening – Per Section 10-5-4 Screening of the Unified Development Ordinance, ground/wall-mounted and roof mounted mechanical units that are visible from any public right- of-way or adjacent residential property shall be screened from public view. Petitioner is seeking to establish standards for screening both types of mechanical units (Deviation #9). Petitioner proposes to screen ground mounted mechanical equipment with vinyl fencing matching the height of the generator units but excluding any stacks protruding above the unit. No additional screening is proposed for rooftop mechanical units located within penthouses. Staff recommends that major mechanical equipment, including backup generators, chillers, and HVAC units be located on the sides of buildings or areas farthest from nearby residential structures. If rooftop placement is proposed, the equipment should be enclosed in penthouses with sound-dampening construction and utilize the quietest available technology, such as hospital-grade mufflers. Regardless of location, all major mechanical equipment must be fully enclosed or screened by solid barriers to minimize visual and noise impacts. Staff has engaged a sound engineer to evaluate the preliminary PUD plan, taking into consideration the surrounding existing and future land uses, and prepare a report regarding recommendations for noise mitigation and location of outdoor mechanical equipment. The sound engineer has prepared preliminary recommendations (see attached) which will be conditions of the special use for Planned Unit Development (PUD) and will also review the petitioner’s building permit applications for noise control design and analysis. 11. Lots – Per Section 10-7-2 requires all lots to conform with district standards and states all lots shall front or abut on a public street. Since the site has internal private roadways (Deviation #10). The petitioner is seeking waiver from the requirement for lots to have access on a public street due to the unique nature of the secure data center campus. Staff is supportive of this request. 12. Appearance Standards - Per Section 10-5-8-C-4 Industrial Uses, masonry products or precast concrete shall be incorporated on at least fifty (50) percent of the total building. Any other facade that abuts a street shall incorporate masonry products or precast concrete. The use of masonry products or precast concrete is encouraged on the remaining facades. Where precast concrete panels or split face block is utilized, the use of colors, patterns, or other architectural features within these panels/blocks is encouraged. The petitioner has submitted exterior building renderings (see following page) featuring a minimalist façade with clean lines and a predominantly white or light grey exterior, likely composed of metal panels or precast concrete for durability and thermal efficiency. However, the design incorporates few windows and architectural interest only at the building entrance. While the use of precast concrete panels aligns with the material requirements of the Appearance Standards, the overall design and color palette fall short of meeting those standards and fail to 11 present an aesthetically acceptable appearance on the long blank expanses of the side facades. (Deviation #11). Staff recommends buildings visible from Eldamain, E. Beecher and Galena Roads have the highest aesthetic standards that can be economically achieve. It is important that these structures, which will be located at the entrance into the City, make a statement. 12 13. Street Design and Improvements – The petitioner is requesting exemption from the requirements of Section 10-7-3 in the Unified Development Ordinance (Deviation #12). Standards in this section apply only to publicly dedicated roadways. No internal roads are proposed for public dedication. While staff is supportive of the request, we recommend that realignment of E. Beecher Road remains a seamless roadway—there can be no jogs or 90- degree curves. It must function as intended in our comprehensive plan, which may necessitate the reorientation or reconfiguration of buildings near Substation 1 or other traffic control/roadway safety mitigation solutions approved by the City. Prologis continues to evaluate roadway design options and will work with the City Engineer to evaluate pros and cons of alternatives. Further, per the City Engineer, the following improvements are recommended to the following abutting roadways: a. Reconstruction of E. Beecher Road from Corneils Road to Galena Road. b. Intersection improvements at E. Beecher Road and Galena Road. c. Corneils Road reconstruction across the frontage of the subject property, including the ComEd parcel. d. Potential intersection improvements to E. Beecher Road and Corneils Road. 14. Fencing - Per Section 10-5-5-B-1 of the Unified Development Ordinance states fences may be built up to the property line but shall not extend beyond the front plane of the primary building facade in residential and business districts. Maximum height for fencing in manufacturing districts is eight (8) feet (Deviation #13). Petitioner has provided a manufacturers brochure of proposed high security steel fencing. They are requesting to have a twelve (12) foot tall powder coated black steel security fence extend beyond the front plane of the primary building façade. Staff is supportive of the request. ELDAMAIN ROAD & BRIGHT FARMS RECAPTURES In 2011, the City of Yorkville, City of Plano, and Kendall County entered into an intergovernmental agreement regarding the future reconstruction of Eldamain Road from Menards Distribution Center north to Galena Road (Ord. 2011-05). Kendall County agreed to bring Eldamain Road under its jurisdiction and made roadway improvements costing $6,300,000 for that portion of the roadway. The three (3) governmental entities agreed to equally share the improvements cost which are to be paid through recapture agreements from future annexed properties with frontage along Eldamain Road (refer to attached Eldamain Road Recapture Benefitted Parcels). a. The recapture amount is approximately ~161.00 per lineal foot of frontage along Eldamain Road. The estimated total recapture is approximately $295,000. Below is an estimated amount of the proposed annexed parcel which is obligated to pay per the intergovernmental agreements at time of final plat: The Project Steel property is also subject to the Bright Farms/Corneils Road Interceptor recapture agreement. This 2022 agreement between the City and the Bright Farms greenhouse developer on Eldamain Road outlines the extension of sanitary sewer service to the area (see map below), including the design, land acquisition, and construction of approximately 8,500 linear feet of sewer interceptor—at a PARCEL ESTIMATED FRONTAGE ESTIMATED RECAPTURE 02‐06‐300‐011 ~ 1,832 linear feet $294,952 TOTAL ~ 1,832 linear feet $294,952 13 total estimated cost of up to $3.2 million. While Bright Farms was responsible for fronting the majority of the project costs, the agreement includes a recapture provision allowing Bright Farms to recover approximately $1.9 million from future properties that benefit from the infrastructure. Once a final land plan is confirmed and a water usage estimate is completed, the City Engineer will determine the applicable recapture fee for Project Steel. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The following is a list of operational conditions recommended by staff to be included in the Planned Unit Development for the future data center campus, which is aimed at addressing resident concerns and maintaining quality of life: a. Nuclear Energy Uses - Data center campuses shall be strictly prohibited from using, generating, storing, or deploying nuclear energy as a power source within the City. This includes, but is not limited to, nuclear reactors, small modular reactors (SMRs), or any other nuclear-based technology. b. Noise Study – A noise study shall be provided as part of the building permitting process which will be subject to review by the City’s sound engineering consultant which entails: i. A pre-construction noise study including baseline noise measurements of the current environment and predictive modeling in phased and at full buildout to ensure the facility’s design will meet local noise limits ii. A mitigation plan in their noise study to ensure that operational noise does not exceed the City’s current noise ordinance regulations. iii. Continuous noise monitoring devises shall be installed at the onset of construction and reports provided to the City throughout the life of the project is 14 recommended by the City’s sound engineering consultant to verify ongoing noise compliance. c. Operational Testing – Operational testing of emergency backup generators shall be limited to the following: i. Only between the hours of 11am-5pm on weekdays and non-holidays. d. Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) - Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) shall be submitted and approved by the City and Fire Protection District (BKFD) prior to issuance of a building permit and must include: i. Procedures for fire suppression, hazardous material spills, evacuation, and communication in case of an incident. ii. Training sessions/drill and or walkthroughs with fire and police shall be required prior to occupancy permit. iii. Designated contacts for emergency services and a plan to broadcast information if an incident could affect the public. iv. Must work with KenCom emergency managers to be part of text or siren alert systems. e. Building Code Standards – The following building code standards shall apply: i. Installing advanced early fire detection in server rooms, using fire-resistive construction beyond code minimums on walls facing neighborhoods, or providing additional hazardous material safeguards. ii. Compliance with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 855. f. Battery Storage - Battery uses and storage systems shall be in a separate standalone building a minimum of 50 feet away from any adjacent structure and must be readily accessible by the fire protection district for firefighting efforts. The following additional standards will apply: i. An approved fire safety and evacuation plan shall be prepared and maintained for occupancies that involve activities for the research and development, testing, manufacturing, handling, or storage of lithium-ion batteries or lithium metal batteries, or the repair or servicing of vehicles powered by lithium – ion batteries or lithium metal batteries. ii. A fire detection and alarm system are required for indoor storage rooms and outdoor storage. The method of fire detection is either an air-aspirating system or a radiant- energy sensing system. Indoor rooms are also required to be sprinklered and separated from the remainder of the occupancy by two- hour barriers. This structure must provide a 2-hour fire-resistance-rated enclosure and must have an automatic sprinkler system and detection system. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update designates the subject property for Project Steel as “Estate/Conservation Residential (ECR)”. The “Estate/Conservation Residential (ECR)” is intended to provide flexibility for residential design which will accommodate low-density detached single-family housing. The current future land use designation reflects a holding category for parcels not likely to develop within the 10-year horizon of the comprehensive plan’s timeline. While the land use map should guide future land use and development and zoning decisions, it is also meant to be adjusted and changed when circumstances warrant a change in planning direction in a given area of the City. 15 Overall, staff supports the proposed PUD for a data center campus, as the corridor along Eldamain Road has been identified in the Comprehensive Plan for manufacturing development and has also experienced a recent trend of development for M-2 land uses (specifically data centers). However, staff would like to note the following recommendations from the Comprehensive Plan related to the subject property: In Figure 8.17: Eldamain Road Corridor Land Use Strategy of the Yorkville 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update (North of the Fox River) the subject area is identified as “Zone B – Distribution (Corneils Road to BNSF Railroad)” meaning this area is recommended for modern industrial park incorporating branding and placemaking elements, as well as a 50’ to 100’ buffer to maintain the zone’s semi-rural visual character. The recommended enhanced perimeter landscaping along Eldamain Road for the proposed Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plan will accomplish this comprehensive plan goal. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: Similar to the Cyrus One and the proposed Project Cardinal data center campuses, Project Steel will require a separate development agreement. This agreement will define key provisions related to development offsets and infrastructure funding. To help mitigate the scale and potential impact of the 540-acre data center project, the petitioner is expected to offer meaningful community contributions— such as the installation of gateway signage and dedication of land or monetary donations to the City. Additionally, the agreement will address funding for anticipated water and sanitary sewer improvements, including design engineering, payment schedules, and potential recapture provisions. City staff is working closely with the petitioner as they finalize projected utility demands, which will guide the City Engineer and YBSD in preparing a water and sewer capacity study. A draft of the development agreement is expected to be presented to the City Council on or before the date of the final project vote. 16 COMMUNITY MEETING: In accordance with Section 10-8-13-B-1-a of the Unified Development Ordinance, the Plan Council may recommend that the petitioner hold a community meeting with nearby property owners to present the proposed Annexation, Rezoning, and Planned Unit Development (PUD). This meeting, conducted at the petitioner’s expense and at a location of their choosing, is intended to inform residents and gather input prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing. Given the scale and intensity of the proposed data center campus, City staff has required the petitioner to engage directly with neighboring homeowners along Eldamain Road, E. Beecher Road, and Corneils Road, as well as residents of the Caledonia subdivision located approximately 0.5 miles southeast of the project site. These meetings must occur in advance of the upcoming Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council public hearings to ensure residents are informed and have an opportunity to provide feedback. STAFF COMMENTS: The proposed applications for Annexation, Rezoning, Planned Unit Development, and Preliminary PUD Plan are in general conformance with the standards provided in the Unified Development Ordinance. The petitioner has provided written responses to these standards which will be incorporated into the record during the public hearing. Staff is confident the petitioner will provide updated plans responsive to the recommendations enumerated in this memo to proceed to the next scheduled meeting. All PUD approvals will also be subject to review comments provided by the City Engineer, EEI Inc., in a letter dated April 4, 2025, and the City’s sound engineer, Soundscape Engineering, in letters dated April 7, 2025, and April 28, 2025, any subsequent reviews. Therefore, the public hearing for the requested annexation is tentatively scheduled to be held at the June 24th City Council meeting and the public hearing for the requested rezoning, special use for the Planned Unit Development, and Preliminary PUD Plan is tentatively planned for the July 9th Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. A tentative final vote by the City Council is expected at the July 22nd meeting. Should you have any questions regarding this matter; staff will be available at Tuesday night’s meeting. Attachments: 1. Proposed Data Center Developments Map 2. Copy of Petitioner’s Applications dated March 14, 2025 3. Legal Descriptions prepared by Langan Engineering 4. Project Steel Narrative prepared by Gregory W. Jones, attorney, Ancel Glink dated March 14, 2025 5. Revised Preliminary PUD Site Plan dated 05/16/2025 submitted by Prologis and prepared by Langan Engineering. 6. Revised Conceptual Landscape Plan dated 05/16/2025 submitted by Prologis and prepared by Langan Engineering. 7. Architectural Renderings submitted by Prologis 8. Trip Generation Memo dated March 14, 2025, submitted by Prologis, and prepared by Langan Engineering. 9. Security Fencing Details submitted by Prologis 10. Response Letter to Plan Council Meeting Follow-up Letter dated May 16, 2025, and prepared by Prologis 11. EEI Review Letter to the City dated April 4, 2025 12. Soundscape Engineering Review Memos dated April 7, 2025, and April 28, 2025 13. Plan Council Packet Materials 04-24-2025 14. Proposed Shared Use Trail Exhibit dated May 2025, prepared By EEI. 15. Email from Elizabeth Fotopoulos dated March 25, 2025 Attachment 1 Annexation Territory 02-06-300-011: No address. 02-07-100-007 No address. 02-07-300-002 No address 02-07-400-002 No address 02-07-400-003 No address 02-07-400-004 No address 02-08-300-004 No address 02-08-100-007 No address 02-18-200-002 No address 02-18-200-003 No address 02-07-200-010 No address 02-07-200-001 1128 Beecher Rd W Bristol, IL 60512 02-07-200-008 No address 02-07-100-008 1327 Beecher Rd W Bristol, IL 60512 02-06-400-005 No address 02-07-200-009 1010 Beecher Rd W Bristol, IL 60512 Attachment 1 Annexation Territory 02-06-300-011: No address. 02-07-100-007 No address. 02-07-300-002 No address 02-07-400-002 No address 02-07-400-003 No address 02-07-400-004 No address 02-08-300-004 No address 02-08-100-007 No address 02-18-200-002 No address 02-18-200-003 No address 02-07-200-010 No address 02-07-200-001 1128 Beecher Rd W Bristol, IL 60512 02-07-200-008 No address 02-07-100-008 1327 Beecher Rd W Bristol, IL 60512 02-06-400-005 No address 02-07-200-009 1010 Beecher Rd W Bristol, IL 60512 Attachment 1 02-06-300-011: No address. 02-07-100-007 No address. 02-07-300-002 No address 02-07-400-002 No address 02-07-400-003 No address 02-07-400-004 No address 02-08-300-004 No address 02-08-100-007 No address 02-18-200-002 No address 02-18-200-003 No address 02-07-200-010 No address 02-07-200-001 1128 Beecher Rd W Bristol, IL 60512 02-07-200-008 No address 02-07-100-008 1327 Beecher Rd W Bristol, IL 60512 02-06-400-005 No address 02-07-200-009 1010 Beecher Rd W Bristol, IL 60512 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Pursuant to and in accordance with Section 7-1-8 of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 5/7-1-8, the undersigned Petitioners seek to annex certain territory to the United City of Yorkville, Illinois (“City”) and in furtherance thereof, state as follows: 1. The Petitioners signing this Petition constitute all of the owners of record of the property described in Attachment 1 to this Petition (“Annexation Territory”). 2. There are either (i) no electors residing in the Annexation Territory or (ii) at least 51% of the electors residing in the Annexation Territory have joined this petition as evidenced by their signatures to this Petition. 3. As of the date of this Petition, the Annexation Territory is not within any other municipality and is wholly unincorporated. 4. The Annexation Territory is contiguous to the corporate limits of the City. 5. The Petition conforms in form and substance to the requirements of Section 7-1-8 of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 5/7-1-8. 6. The Petitioners desire that the Village annex the Annexation Territory to the City conditioned upon Rosenwinkel, Schultz, Auer and Foltz Properties or its assign, and the City entering into a mutually acceptable annexation agreement to govern the terms and conditions of the annexation and development of the Annexation Territory. WHEREFORE, the Petitioners respectfully request that the Village annex the Annexation Territory to the City in accordance with and pursuant to Section 7-1-8 of the Illinois Municipal Code. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] Docusign Envelope ID: 0D0570EC-33F1-485F-9495-3CBCAABC4362 Petitioner Signatures (Owners of Record) The undersigned certifies that he/she has read the foregoing Petition for Annexation, has knowledge of the allegations contained therein, is an owner of record of land within the Annexation Territory, and that the allegations are true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge: Owner’s Name Owner’s Address/PIN Owner’s Signature ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ (Electors, if any) The undersigned certifies that he/she has read the foregoing Petition for Annexation, has knowledge of the allegations contained therein, is an elector residing within the Annexation Territory, and that the allegations are true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge: Elector’s Name Elector’s Address/PIN Elector’s Signature ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ 02-07-100-008 02-06-400-005 1327 W. Beecher Rd. Plano, IL 60545 Estate of Mary C. Auer, Crystal Jernigan, Independent Administrator AUER Docusign Envelope ID: 0D0570EC-33F1-485F-9495-3CBCAABC4362 Attachment 1 Annexation Territory Legal Description Rosenwinkel Parcels: 02-06-300-001 02-07-100-007 02-07-300-002 02-07-400-002 02-07-400-003 02-07-400-004 02-08-300-004 02-08-100-007 02-18-200-002 02-18-200-003 Schultz Parcels: 02-07-200-010 02-07-200-001 02-07-200-008 Auer Parcels: 02-07-100-008 02-06-400-005 Foltz Parcel: 02-07-200-009 Docusign Envelope ID: 0D0570EC-33F1-485F-9495-3CBCAABC4362 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Pursuant to and in accordance with Section 7-1-8 of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 5/7-1-8, the undersigned Petitioners seek to annex certain territory to the United City of Yorkville, Illinois (“City”) and in furtherance thereof, state as follows: 1. The Petitioners signing this Petition constitute all of the owners of record of the property described in Attachment 1 to this Petition (“Annexation Territory”). 2. There are either (i) no electors residing in the Annexation Territory or (ii) at least 51% of the electors residing in the Annexation Territory have joined this petition as evidenced by their signatures to this Petition. 3. As of the date of this Petition, the Annexation Territory is not within any other municipality and is wholly unincorporated. 4. The Annexation Territory is contiguous to the corporate limits of the City. 5. The Petition conforms in form and substance to the requirements of Section 7-1-8 of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 5/7-1-8. 6. The Petitioners desire that the Village annex the Annexation Territory to the City conditioned upon Rosenwinkel, Schultz, Auer and Foltz Properties or its assign, and the City entering into a mutually acceptable annexation agreement to govern the terms and conditions of the annexation and development of the Annexation Territory. WHEREFORE, the Petitioners respectfully request that the Village annex the Annexation Territory to the City in accordance with and pursuant to Section 7-1-8 of the Illinois Municipal Code. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] Docusign Envelope ID: 0D0570EC-33F1-485F-9495-3CBCAABC4362 Petitioner Signatures (Owners of Record) The undersigned certifies that he/she has read the foregoing Petition for Annexation, has knowledge of the allegations contained therein, is an owner of record of land within the Annexation Territory, and that the allegations are true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge: Owner’s Name Owner’s Address/PIN Owner’s Signature ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ (Electors, if any) The undersigned certifies that he/she has read the foregoing Petition for Annexation, has knowledge of the allegations contained therein, is an elector residing within the Annexation Territory, and that the allegations are true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge: Elector’s Name Elector’s Address/PIN Elector’s Signature ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ ___________________ ________________________ _______________________ 02-07-100-008 02-06-400-005 1327 W. Beecher Rd. Plano, IL 60545 Estate of Mary C. Auer, Crystal Jernigan, Independent Administrator AUER Docusign Envelope ID: 0D0570EC-33F1-485F-9495-3CBCAABC4362 Attachment 1 Annexation Territory Legal Description Rosenwinkel Parcels: 02-06-300-001 02-07-100-007 02-07-300-002 02-07-400-002 02-07-400-003 02-07-400-004 02-08-300-004 02-08-100-007 02-18-200-002 02-18-200-003 Schultz Parcels: 02-07-200-010 02-07-200-001 02-07-200-008 Auer Parcels: 02-07-100-008 02-06-400-005 Foltz Parcel: 02-07-200-009 Docusign Envelope ID: 0D0570EC-33F1-485F-9495-3CBCAABC4362 Proposed Consolidated Parcel A Being a part of Section 7 and the South ½ of Section 6, Township 37 North, Range 7 East, being located in Will County and State of Illinois bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a Drill Hole Found being the Southeast Corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 6, also being the Northwest Corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 7, Township 37 North, Range 7 East, said point being the Place of Beginning for the parcel herein described; Course No.1 Thence North 87°19’02” East along the North line of said Northeast Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 208.10 feet to a point at the Northeast corner of Kendall County parcel 02-07-200-009 now or formerly owned by Jerry G. & Marilee Foltz; Course No.2 Thence South 00°53’18” East along the East line of said Kendall County parcel 02-07-200- 009, a distance of 214.52 feet to a point at the Southeast corner of said parcel; Course No.3 Thence South 89°06’42” West along the South line of said Kendall County parcel 02-07-200- 009, a distance of 208.00 feet to a point in the West line of said Northeast Quarter of Section 7, said point also being the Southwest corner of said parcel; Course No.4 Thence South 00°53’18” East along said West line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 373.43 feet to a point at the Northwest corner of Kendall County parcel 02-07-100-002 now or formerly owned by Yorkville Nexus III LLC, as recorded in Document No. 202400010316 of the Kendall County records; Course No.5 Thence South 87°20’23” West along said Yorkville Nexus III LLC land passing through a found 1” pipe at a distance of 21.80 feet, a total distance of 1540.44 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” at a Northeast Corner of Kendall County parcel 02-07-100-014 now or formerly owned by Yorkville Nexus III LLC, as recorded in Document No. 202400010316 of the Kendall County records; Course No.6 Thence South 00°53’18” East along said Yorkville Nexus III Land and Kendall county parcel 02-07-300-005 now or formerly owned by Yorkville Nexus III LLC as recorded in Document No. 202400010316 of the Kendall County records being a line parallel to the East line of the Northwest Quarter of said section 7, a distance of 2073.03 feet to a 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” set in the North line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 7; Course No.7 Thence South 00°53’09” East along said Yorkville Nexus III Land being a line parallel to the East line of the Southwest Quarter of said section 7, a distance of 934.59 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” along the North line of Kendall County parcel 02-07-300-004 now or formerly owned by Illinois Greenhouse LLC, as recorded in Document No. 202200008845 of the Kendall County records; Course No.8 Thence North 87°20’23” East along said Greenhouse LLC land, a distance of 1540.44 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” along the East line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 7; Course No.9 Thence South 00°53’09” East along said East line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 7, a distance of 1712.61 feet to a ¾” inch iron pipe found at the Southeast corner of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 7; Page 2 of 3 Course No.10 Thence North 07°57’11” East along Kendall County parcel 02-07-400-001 now or formerly owned by Commonwealth Edison, a distance of 2692.07 feet to a 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” set along the North line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 7; Course No.11 Thence continuing North 07°57’11” East along Kendall County parcel 02-07-200-003 now or formerly owned by Commonwealth Edison, a distance of 197.38 feet to a 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” set at an angle point thereof; Course No.12 Thence North 00°52’32” West along said Commonwealth Edison parcel 02-07-200-003, a distance of 2460.47 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” at a point along the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 7; Course No.13 Thence North 00°52’32” West along Kendall County parcel 02-06-400-002 now or formerly owned by Commonwealth Edison, a distance of 100.37 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.”; Course No.13 Thence North 25°58’37” East along said Commonwealth Edison parcel 02-06-400-002, a distance of 1049.27 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” at the southeast corner of Kendall County parcel 02-06-400-001 now or formerly owned by Dale L Konicek LLC as recorded in Document No. 201702819 of the Kendall County Records; Course No.14 Thence South 87°59’38” West along said Konicek LLC land passing through a found 1” iron pipe at a distance of 1.92 feet and a found 1” iron pipe at a distance of 644.41 feet, a total distance of 645.62 feet to a set Railroad Spike in the centerline of Beecher Road; Course No.15 Thence North 13°51’44” East along said Beecher Road, a distance of 1351.75 feet to a MAG nail set at the centerline of Galena Road, width varies; Course No.16 Thence North 80°37’24” West along said centerline of Galena Road, a distance of 1700.21 feet to a MAG nail set at the Northeast corner of a parcel of land conveyed to the County of Kendall for highway or other public purpose as recorded in Document No. 200300007826 of the Kendall County records; Thence the following seven (7) course and distances along said Kendall County parcel; Course No.17 Thence South 08°36'02" West a distance of 63.15' to a point; Cours No.18 Thence North 80°37'24" West a distance of 691.60' to a point; Course No.19 Thence South 57°39'02" West a distance of 45.32' to a point; Course No.20 Thence South 16°42'03" West a distance of 172.08' to a point of curvature; Course No.21 Thence with a curve deflecting to the right an arc length of 388.30 feet, having a radius of 2914.79 feet, a delta of 07°37’58”, a chord bearing of South12°48'52" West, and a chord length of 388.01 feet; Course No.22 Thence South16°32'25" West a distance of 267.93' to a point; Page 3 of 3 Course No.23 Thence North73°22'09" West a distance of 53.45' to a MAG nail set in the centerline of Eldamain Road, width varies; Course No.24 Thence South 16°32’25” West along said centerline of Eldamain Road, a distance of 819.06 feet to a set MAG nail; Course No.25 Thence South 17°00’48” West along said Eldamain Road, a distance of 122.84 feet to a MAG nail set at the Northwest corner of Kendall County parcel 02-06-300-009 now or formerly owned by Latham Schleining and Tammi M Schleining as recorded in Document No. 201408168 of the Kendall County records; Course No.26 Thence North 87°15’26” East along said Schleining Land, a distance of 443.00 feet to a found ½” rebar; Course No.27 Thence South 17°00’48” East along said Schleining Land, a distance of 1149.27 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” along the South line of said Section 6; Course No.28 Thence North 87°15’26” East along the South line of said Section 6, a distance of 2255.11 feet to the Place of Beginning, said parcel containing 13,051,959 square feet or 299.6317 acres of land according to a survey by LANGAN Engineering and Environmental Services dated March, 2025 and being the same more or less and being subject to all legal highways and easements. The basis of bearings of this survey is based on the Illinois State Plane Coordinate System, East Zone, NAD 83, per GPS observations in March, 2025. Proposed Consolidated Parcel B That Part of the West ½ of Section 8 and the East ½ of Section 7 all in Township 37 North, Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian, being located in Kendall County and State of Illinois bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a 1” Iron Pipe found being the Center of said Section 8, Township 37 North, Range 7 East, said point being the Place of Beginning for the parcel herein described; Course No. 1 Thence South 87°34’35” West along the South line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 7, a distance of 2029.07 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” at the Southeast corner of Kendall County parcel 02-08-100-005 now or formerly owned by George & Anne Marie Ostreko, as recorded in Document No. 84000193 of the Kendall County records; Course No.2 Thence North 01°18’34” West along said Ostreko land, a distance of 617.97 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” at the Northeast Corner of said Kendall County parcel 02-08-100- 005; Course No.3 Thence South 87°45’53” West along said Ostreko land, a distance of 625.76 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” in the West line of said Northwest Quarter of Section 8, said point also being the Northwest Corner of said Kendall County parcel 02-08-100-005; Course No.4 Thence South 00°51’47” East along said West line, a distance of 620.14 feet to a ¾” Iron Pipe found at the Southwest Corner of said Northwest Quarter of Section 8, said point also being the Southwest Corner of said Kendall County parcel 02-08-100-005; Course No.5 Thence North 87°34’35” East along the South line of said Northwest Quarter of Section 8, a distance of 14.00 feet to the Northeast corner of Kendall County parcel 02-08-300-014 now or formerly owned by Larry A. Wallis & Charles Van Thompson, from which point a ¾” Iron Pipe lies 0.15’ East and 0.15’ North; Course No.6 Thence South 01°33’15” East along a West line of said Wallis & Thompson Land, a distance of 1358.39 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” at an angle point thereon; Course No.7 Thence North 87°46’06” East along a South line of said Wallis & Thompson Land, a distance of 216.72 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” at an angle point thereon; Course No.8 Thence South 01°49’08” East along a West line of said Wallis & Thompson Land, a distance of 1057.46 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” at an angle point thereon; Course No.9 Thence South 01°43’16” East along a West line of said Wallis & Thompson Land, a distance of 200.71 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” at an angle point thereon; Course No.10 Thence South 87°32’04” West along a North line of said Wallis & Thompson land, a distance of 272.68 feet to a 1” Iron Pipe found along the West line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 8; Page 2 of 3 Course No.11 Thence South 00°45’21” East along said West line of the Southwest Quarter of section 8, a distance of 37.42 feet to the Southwest Corner of said Section 8 being referenced by a found 3/4” iron pipe; Course No.12 Thence continuing South 00°45’21” East along the West line of the Northwest Quarter of section 17, a distance of 143.44 feet to the centerline of Corneils Road; Course No.13 Thence North 86°15’51” West along said centerline of Corneils Road, a distance of 1322.08 feet to a MAG nail set at the intersection of the centerline of Beecher Road; Course No.14 Thence South 87°30’36” West along the centerline of said Beecher Road, a distance of 566.16 feet to a MAG nail set at the Southeast corner of Kendall County parcel 02-07-400-001 now or formerly owned by Commonwealth Edison; Course No.15 Thence North 07°57’11” East along said Commonwealth Edison Parcel 02-07-400-001, a distance of 2694.50 feet to a MAG nail set in the South line of said Northeast Quarter of Section 7, said point also being the Southeast corner of Kendall County parcel 02-07-200-003 now or formerly owned by Commonwealth Edison; Course No.16 Thence continuing North 07°57’11” East along said Commonwealth Edison Parcel 02-07- 200-003, a distance of 115.68 feet to a 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” set at an angle point; Course No.17 Thence North 00°52’32” West along said Commonwealth Edison Parcel 02-07-200-003, a distance of 1681.96 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” At the Southeast corner of Kendall County parcel 02-07-200-015 now or formerly owned by Two Star Enterprises LLC as recorded in Document No. 20140529 of the Kendall County records; Course No.18 Thence North 89°07’28” East along a south line of Kendall County parcel 02-07-200-015 now or formerly owned by Two Star Enterprises, LLC as recorded in Document No. 20140529 of the Kendall County records, a distance of 137.17 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” at an angle point thereon; Course No.19 Thence South 00°52’32” East along a West line of said Two Star Enterprises LLC land, a distance of 646.01 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” at an angle point thereon; Course No.20 Thence North 87°19’40” East along a South line of said Two Star Enterprises LLC land, a distance of 807.16 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” at an angle point thereon; Course No.21 Thence North 00°51’47” West along a South line of said Two Star Enterprises LLC land, a distance of 1051.29 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” at an angle point thereon; Course No.22 Thence North 87°19’02” East along a South line of said Two Star Enterprises LLC land, a distance of 514.86 feet to a set Railroad Spike along the West line of said Section 8 also being the centerline of said Beecher Road; Course No.23 Thence South 00°51’47” East along the East line of said Northeast Quarter of Section 7, a distance of 668.33 feet to a MAG nail set at the Southeast corner of Kendall County parcel 02-08-100- 006 now or formerly owned by Milroy Farms LLC as recorded in Document No. 201218002 of the Kendall County records; Page 3 of 3 Course No.24 Thence North 87°34’15” East along a South line of said Kendall County parcel 02-08-100- 006, a distance of 2655.99 feet to a set 5/8” rebar with cap “LANGAN ENG.” along the East line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 8; Course No.25 Thence South 01°00’08” East along said East line of the Northeast Quarter of section 8, a distance of 1528.63 feet to the Place of Beginning, said parcel containing 10,886,275 square feet or 249.9145 acres of land according to a survey by LANGAN Engineering and Environmental Services dated March 2025 and being the same more or less and being subject to all legal highways and easements. The basis of bearings of this survey is based on the Illinois State Plane Coordinate System, East Zone, NAD 83, per GPS observations in March, 2025. A Professional Corporation 140 South Dearborn Street, Suite 600 Chicago, IL 60603 www.ancelglink.com Gregory W. Jones gjones@ancelglink.com (P) 312.604.9195 (F) 312.782.0943 CHICAGO ● VERNON HILLS ● NAPERVILLE ● CRYSTAL LAKE ● BLOOMINGTON March 14, 2025 Via: E-Mail and Messenger Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Re: Prologis, L.P. Annexation and Development Application Project Steel, Yorkville, Illinois Dear Krysti, We represent Prologis, L.P. (“Prologis”), the contract purchaser of +/- 540 acres of property (“Subject Property”) located in unincorporated Kendall County that is contiguous to the United City of Yorkville’s (“Yorkville”) municipal boundary. The Subject Property is generally located east of Eldamain Road between Corneils Road on the south and Galena Road on the north. Prologis is pleased to have the opportunity to invest in Yorkville by submitting the enclosed annexation and entitlement application for the Subject Property. I. Background Prologis proposes to annex the Subject Property and obtain approval of rezoning, preliminary planned unit development (“PUD”), and right-of-way vacation to facilitate development of a campus containing up to 24 data center buildings, electrical substations, and related improvements. Each data center building may contain up to 400,000 square feet of floor area, producing over 9 million square feet for the entire project. The parcels comprising the Subject Property are identified on Exhibit A and are zoned a mix of A1, Agriculture, A1, Special Use Agriculture, and M2, Heavy Industrial in accordance with the Kendall County Zoning Ordinance. The Subject Property is primarily used for farming and is bordered on the east and north by agricultural uses. BrightFarms’ industrial greenhouse facility is located south of the Subject Property and, south of that, is a Commonwealth Edison substation facility and the site of Cyrus One’s recently-approved data center campus. Excluding the current and pending developments south of the Subject Property, the area is predominantly agricultural property. Yorkville’s 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update (“Comprehensive Plan”) designates the Subject Property’s future land use as “estate/conservation residential” and the land immediately south of the Subject Property as “general industrial.” Notably, the Comprehensive Plan acknowledges future land use designations are intended to be adjusted as circumstances warrant change. (Comprehensive Plan p. 80) As discussed further below, the increasing need for data center infrastructure nationwide and Yorkville’s recent embrace of data center and industrial ANCEL GLINK March 14, 2025 Page 2 CHICAGO ● VERNON HILLS ● NAPERVILLE ● CRYSTAL LAKE ● BLOOMINGTON development on nearby properties supports revisiting the Comprehensive Plan’s future land use designation, which was adopted nearly a decade ago before the benefits of and demand for data centers became so apparent. II. Proposal Prologis proposes to annex and facilitate development of the Subject Property in 3 phases, all as detailed in the Phasing Plan enclosed as Exhibit B. Construction on the first phase is anticipated to begin during the summer of 2027, and Prologis anticipates the Subject Property will be fully developed over the course of 20 years. Each phase will be served by its own stormwater and other infrastructure that will be built in tandem with the private improvements included in each phase. Due to the project’s scale and the need to coordinate with third-party utility providers, including (among others) Commonwealth Edison (“ComEd”) and the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District, the precise start dates for each phase will necessarily depend on a variety of factors that are currently fluid. Upon completion, Prologis expects the Subject Property to be home to 24 data center facilities that include more than 9 million square feet of floor area, 3 ComEd substations, up to 8 stormwater detention facilities, a realigned and reconstructed public street (East Beecher Road), and related public and private improvements. Prologis’ investment in the Subject Property is expected to exceed one billion dollars. Prologis seeks approval of several requests to facilitate the Subject Property’s development, including: 1) Annexation of the Subject Property and approval of an annexation agreement; 2) A map amendment to zone the Subject Property M-2 General Manufacturing (“M2 District”) upon annexation; 3) Vacation and realignment of Beecher Road to create a secure data center campus and increase traffic efficiencies in the area; and 4) A special use for a preliminary PUD, including the deviations / variations identified in Section II(d) below. In addition to the above entitlement requests, Prologis proposes to enter into a public utility infrastructure agreement with Yorkville to allow Prologis to recover its upfront investment in water infrastructure, wastewater infrastructure, and Beecher Road improvements. Additional details concerning each of Prologis’ requests is below, including responses to the applicable UDO standards. ANCEL GLINK March 14, 2025 Page 3 CHICAGO ● VERNON HILLS ● NAPERVILLE ● CRYSTAL LAKE ● BLOOMINGTON a) Annexation and Annexation Agreement Annexation petitions are attached as Exhibit C and a draft annexation plat will be provided shortly. The Subject Property encompasses approximately 540 acres, is contiguous to Yorkville’s corporate boundaries on the south, west, and east, and is eligible for annexation into the Village. Prologis anticipates entering into an annexation agreement with Yorkville containing mutually beneficial terms governing the Subject Property’s annexation and future development. b) Map Amendment Prologis proposes to rezone the Subject Property from its current Kendall County zoning designations to Yorkville’s M2 District. Data centers and electrical substations are both identified as permitted uses in the M2 District. (UDO Sec. 10-3-12(B)) Prologis’ responses to the UDO’s rezoning standards are below. Standard 1: State how the map amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of the UDO. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the Subject Property’s future land use as “estate/conservation residential;” however, the Comprehensive Plan also acknowledges future land use designations are intended to be adjusted as circumstances warrant change. Area development patterns and opportunities have changed significantly since the Comprehensive Plan’s adoption in 2016. The need for data center infrastructure has increased dramatically in recent years – something that Yorkville has acknowledged by amending the UDO to encourage data center projects generally, and, more specifically, by approving a data center project just south of the Subject Property. Yorkville has embraced industrial and energy redevelopments along the Eldamain Road corridor, including on property immediately south of the Subject Property, which (like the Subject Property) the Comprehensive Plan designated for future development as estate/conservation residential. Zoning the Subject Property M2 upon annexation is a logical extension of the zoning and development pattern Yorkville has already embraced. Standard 2: State how the map amendment is consistent with the existing and planned uses of nearby properties. The Eldamain Road corridor is planned for industrial and energy uses. Yorkville approved a data center project last summer at the intersection of Eldamain Road and Faxon Road. ComEd distribution lines bisect the Subject Property and a large substation is located just south of the Subject Property. An industrial-grade farming facility (BrightFarms) is located immediately south of the Subject Property, and we understand a solar farm will shortly be built east of the Subject Property. Yorkville has recently invested significantly in regional water and sanitary sewer infrastructure upgrades that would support the redevelopment of the Subject Property with additional industrial and energy uses. Prologis’ development represents the logical extension of the existing use pattern and realization of Yorkville’s intended outcome for the area. ANCEL GLINK March 14, 2025 Page 4 CHICAGO ● VERNON HILLS ● NAPERVILLE ● CRYSTAL LAKE ● BLOOMINGTON Standard 3: State how the proposed zoning designation is suitable for the Subject Property. The M2 District provides suitable regulation for future development of the Subject Property. The properties on the east side of Eldamain Road adjacent to the Subject Property and extending south to the train tracks (a distance of 2+ miles) are almost uniformly zoned M2. Applying the M2 District to the Subject Property is consistent with the area’s existing zoning composition. Further, the M2 District accommodates large-lot, campus-style developments consistent with Prologis’ proposal. The Subject Property is large enough to mitigate potential off-site impacts (although few such impacts are anticipated) through the use of buffers greatly in excess of minimum setbacks, screening, and perimeter landscaping. Further, the proposed data center and electric utility uses are permitted by right in the M2 District. Standard 4: State how the proposed map amendment will not result in an individual parcel zoned in one zoning district that is not shared by any adjacent parcels. The property located immediately west of the Subject Property is zoned M2 – the same zoning designation Prologis seeks for the Subject Property. The property located south of the Subject Property is occupied by an industrial agricultural use (BrightFarms) and is zoned PUD. The east side of the Eldamain Road corridor from Faxon Road on the south to Corneils Road on the north is uniformly zoned M2. Rezoning the Subject Property to the M2 District is the logical northward extension of the M2 Zoning District. Standard 5: State how the Subject Property will meet the minimum frontage and area requirements in the M2 District. The M2 District does not establish minimum lot size or lot width standards. Regardless, the Subject Property has frontage on four public streets – Eldamain Road, Galena Road, Corneils Road, and Beecher Road – and contains 540 acres. The Subject Property will utilize that space and right of way adjacency to develop a thoughtful campus that is mindful of adjacent land uses and aesthetic integrity. Standard 6: State the community need for the proposed land use. Technological advances have increased the need for data center infrastructure to support the modern economy and a rapidly advancing society. Developing the Subject Property as a data center campus will position Yorkville and the entire region for continued growth while delivering increased tax revenue and infrastructure upgrades necessary to support Yorkville. Standard 7: State the length of time the Subject Property has been vacant as zoned considered in the context of the land development in the area in the vicinity of the Subject Property. The Subject Property has been farmed for many years. The Comprehensive Plan acknowledges the Subject Property will redevelop upon annexation, and Yorkville has recently and consistently ANCEL GLINK March 14, 2025 Page 5 CHICAGO ● VERNON HILLS ● NAPERVILLE ● CRYSTAL LAKE ● BLOOMINGTON embraced industrial and energy uses in the surrounding area. Allowing the Subject Property to redevelop as a data center campus will allow the Subject Property to be improved in a manner that is consistent with Yorkville’s development goals for the Eldamain Road corridor. c. Right of Way Vacation Beecher Road is a low-volume, 2-lane, rural road without curb, gutter, or other public improvements that currently bisects the Subject Property from north to south. While Beecher Road has historically provided adequate access for nearby agricultural uses, the road’s location presents significant challenges to the Subject Property’s successful redevelopment. Beecher Road bisects all 3 substation lots and 4 planned stormwater facilities as it meanders east and north through the Subject Property. Designing around Beecher Road is challenging at best and produces a layout that is less accessible and less secure for data center operators. Prologis proposes to realign Beecher Road to the east to provide a clear, unimpeded path of travel that aligns with the existing E. Beecher Road. This requires vacating W. Beecher Road and part of E. Beecher Road so Prologis can construct a new E. Beecher Road consistent with Yorkville’s standards for collector streets. The proposed realigned will not eliminate access for properties located adjacent to Beecher Road as it exists today. Prologis will continue to provide access to those properties that rely solely on Beecher Road for access, including the property located at 1010 Beecher Road. Prologis is confident that the realigned Beecher Road will benefit both the Subject Property and the region by providing a predictable, efficient, and safe roadway network. d. Special Use for a Planned Unit Development The UDO requires all lots containing 4 or more acres in the M2 District develop as a PUD. Prologis seeks approval of a special use for a preliminary PUD to develop the Subject Property as a data center campus. Below are responses to the UDO’s relevant standards and a list of requested UDO deviations. Special Use Standards Standard 1: The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the Special Use will not be unreasonably detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare. The proposed data center campus will promote the public health, safety, and welfare. The proposed M2 zoning designation allows data centers and electric substations as a permitted use, communicating Yorkville’s commitment to attracting and supporting these types of developments. The development will produce significant construction jobs as well as long-term employment opportunities for area residents and generate significant tax revenue for Yorkville. Prologis seeks to invest significantly in the 500+ acre Subject Property that has long been used for agricultural purposes and help Yorkville to establish itself as a regional leader in the modern economy. ANCEL GLINK March 14, 2025 Page 6 CHICAGO ● VERNON HILLS ● NAPERVILLE ● CRYSTAL LAKE ● BLOOMINGTON Standard 2: The Special Use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within or near the neighborhood in which it is to be located. Despite the high level of investment associated with creating a data center campus of this scale, data centers are passive uses that rarely impose negative impacts on surrounding properties. The Subject Property is divided by ComEd right of way – one of the reasons the Subject Property is appealing for data center users. The property located west of the Subject Property is zoned M2 – the same zoning designation Prologis seeks here. Properties to the north are occupied by an industrial concrete plant (Kendall County Concrete) and, north of Galena Road, additional agricultural uses. To the east is a solar farm that should shortly come on-line and additional agricultural uses. To mitigate potential impacts on neighboring properties, Prologis proposes setbacks that greatly exceed those required by the M2 Zoning District and enhanced landscaping along the Subject Property’s perimeter. The development is consistent with nearby uses and zoning rights and, in some cases, far less intense than neighboring uses. Prologis’ proposed investment in the Subject Property is estimated, upon completion, to exceed one billion dollars, which will increase nearby property values. Standard 3: The establishment of the Special Use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties for uses permitted in the district. Yorkville previously determined that it is sound policy to allow data centers as a permitted use in the M2 Zoning District. The data center and substation uses are not responsible for Prologis’ special use request; the UDO allows those uses by right. Instead, the special use request is driven by the UDO’s requirement that the Subject Property develop as a PUD because of its size. Allowing Prologis to establish a permitted use on the Subject Property will promote consistent development along the Eldamain Road corridor – much of which is also zoned M2. Developing the Subject Property as a PUD also provides predictability to nearby property owners, as Prologis is committing to construct the development on a schedule and in accordance with certain plans and agreements. This level of transparency is both unique and beneficial to surrounding property owners. Standard 4: Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage or other necessary facilities have been or shall be provided. The Subject Property is nearly surrounded by public streets that provide more than sufficient access for this relatively passive use. Consistent with industry standards and end-user requirements for data centers, vehicle access to the Subject Property will be provided primarily by private access drives, all of which will be privately constructed, maintained, and operated. This arrangement significantly reduces maintenance obligations Yorkville would otherwise assume if the access drives were publicly dedicated rights of way. Each data center facility will have a ANCEL GLINK March 14, 2025 Page 7 CHICAGO ● VERNON HILLS ● NAPERVILLE ● CRYSTAL LAKE ● BLOOMINGTON “looped” driveway to provide emergency services and others necessary access to all sides of each structure. Prologis will also invest significantly in regional water and sewer utility upgrades necessary to serve the Subject Property and promote future redevelopment opportunities in the area. The Subject Property will also be served by numerous stormwater facilities that will provide a greater degree of control than presently exists during storm events. Standard 5: Adequate measures shall be taken to provide ingress or egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. Data centers are a relatively passive use. Unlike other commercial and industrial uses, data centers generally do not generate significant traffic, particularly during morning and evening peaks. The development is designed to primarily accommodate vehicle traffic internally, which reduces the need for users to rely on public streets when navigating within the campus. Nevertheless, the development is accessible from Galena Road, Eldamain Road, Corneils Road, and the realigned E. Beecher Road. This design reduces reliance on public streets while still preserving a healthy level of access to the Subject Property. Standard 6: The proposed Special Use is not contrary to the objectives of the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan. The 2016 Comprehensive Plan expressly acknowledges that Yorkville should update future land use designations as circumstances change. Since 2016, the data center industry has grown exponentially, a change that Yorkville has positioned itself well to capitalize upon. Yorkville recently approved a data center project south of the Subject Property and has actively rezoned much of the Eldamain Road corridor to the M2 Zoning District. Yorkville’s UDO – the document primarily responsible for implementing the Comprehensive Plan’s vision – allows data centers and supporting uses as a permitted use in the M2 Zoning District. Allowing a data center to be built on the Subject Property represents the logical implementation of the policy direction Yorkville has adopted over the last few years. Planned Unit Development Standards Standard 1: Please state how the PUD is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and other adopted City plans and policy documents. The Comprehensive Plan acknowledges that future land use designations should change as circumstances change. Since the Comprehensive Plan’s adoption in 2016, the demand for data center infrastructure has increased exponentially. Simultaneously, Yorkville modified its UDO to allow data centers as a permitted use in certain zoning districts, approved a data center project just south of the Subject Property on Eldamain Road, and modified the future land use designation of the adjacent property (to the west) from “estate/conservation residential” to “industrial.” Prologis’ ANCEL GLINK March 14, 2025 Page 8 CHICAGO ● VERNON HILLS ● NAPERVILLE ● CRYSTAL LAKE ● BLOOMINGTON plan to develop the Subject Property as a data center campus represents the logical northward extension of the land use pattern Yorkville has embraced along the Eldamain Road corridor. Standard 2: Please state how the PUD is laid out and developed as a unit in accordance with an integrated overall design, in which the various land uses function as a cohesive whole and support one another. The Subject Property will be developed in a comprehensive and cohesive manner consistent with the preliminary plan accompanying Prologis’ application. The preliminary plan divides the work into 3 phases, each of which will be self-sufficient. Prologis proposes only two uses for the Subject Property: (1) data centers; and (2) electric substations. These two uses are complimentary to and reliant upon each other, and the Subject Property will be developer as sufficient power capacity is secured. The Subject Property’s perimeter features enhanced setbacks and landscape treatments that communicate a high level of design and provide a consistent and quality “front door” for the development. Standard 3: Please state how the PUD is designed, located, and proposed to be operated and maintained so that it will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property and will not substantially increase the danger of fire or otherwise endanger the public health, safety, and welfare. The proposed development will not impair the supply of light or air to nearby properties, nor will it substantially increase the danger of fire or endanger the public health, safety, and welfare. The development features 2-story data center facilities located on predominantly flat land. The height of these buildings, coupled with perimeter setbacks that greatly exceed what is required by the UDO, will not materially impact light supply. Within the site, the buildings are set back from each other at a sufficient distance to have no meaningful impact on light or air supply. Each data center facility is surrounded by a drive aisle wide enough to accommodate 2-way traffic, including emergency services vehicles. Standard 4: Please state how the PUD includes uses that are generally compatible and consistent with the uses of adjacent parcels. If the uses are not generally compatible, all adverse impacts have been mitigated through screening, landscaping, public open space, and other buffering features that protect uses within the development and surrounding properties. The proposed data center campus is consistent with the use and zoning of nearby properties. As discussed earlier, much of the Eldamain Road corridor is zoned M2 – the same designation sought for the Subject Property. Yorkville recently approved a data center campus on property located south of the Subject Property. ComEd right of way occupied by transmission lines passes through the middle of the Subject Property, and a large ComEd substation is located south of the Subject Property on the opposite side of Corneils Road. Establishing a data center campus (which is permitted by right in the M2 district) on the Subject Property is consistent with Yorkville’s existing and future development goals for the area. ANCEL GLINK March 14, 2025 Page 9 CHICAGO ● VERNON HILLS ● NAPERVILLE ● CRYSTAL LAKE ● BLOOMINGTON Standard 5: Please state how the PUD is designed so that adequate utilities, road access, stormwater management, and other necessary facilities will be provided to serve it. The Subject Property is nearly surrounded by public streets that provide more than sufficient access for this relatively passive use. Consistent with industry standards and end-user requirements for data centers, vehicle access to the Subject Property will be provided primarily by private access drives, all of which will be privately constructed, maintained, and operated. This arrangement significantly reduces maintenance obligations Yorkville would otherwise assume if the access drives were publicly dedicated rights of way. Each data center facility will have a “looped” driveway to provide emergency services and others necessary access to all sides of each structure. Prologis will also invest significantly in regional water and sewer utility upgrades necessary to serve the Subject Property and promote future redevelopment opportunities in the area. The Subject Property will also be served by numerous stormwater facilities that will provide a greater degree of control during storm events than presently exists. Standard 6: Please state how the PUD does not substantially adversely impact an archaeological, historical, or cultural resource, included on the local, state, or federal register, located on or off the parcels proposed for development. The proposed development does not substantially adversely impact any known archaeological, historical, or cultural resource. Prologis is unaware of any such resources and, should one be identified, Prologis will work cooperatively with Yorkville to address any reasonable concerns. UDO Deviations 1) Interior Setbacks (UDO Sec. 10-3-9): The UDO requires each M2-zoned lot to provide a 25’ front yard setback and a 20’ interior side yard setback. The proposed campus-style development will be served primarily by private access drives and requires relief from these setback requirements. Prologis instead proposes that setbacks for the Subject Property only be measured from the property’s perimeter. 2) Energy Use Standards (UDO Sec. 10-4-10): The UDO provides that a data center qualifies as an “energy industrial use.” Prologis seeks a deviation to ensure that any UDO standards Yorkville subsequently adopts governing energy industrial uses will not apply to the Subject Property. 3) Off-Street Parking (UDO Sec. 10-5-1(H)(5)): The UDO requires data centers to provide 0.3 parking spaces for each 1,000 square feet of floor area. Prologis expects each data center to contain approximately 379,100 square feet, which would require 114 parking spaces per building. Prologis proposes to provide 47 parking spaces for each building, which is consistent with both industry standards and actual parking demand experienced at ANCEL GLINK March 14, 2025 Page 10 CHICAGO ● VERNON HILLS ● NAPERVILLE ● CRYSTAL LAKE ● BLOOMINGTON Prologis’ other data center facilities. Further, parking shall not be calculated on a lot-by- lot basis. 4) Off-Street Loading (UDO Sec. 10-5-1(Q)): Prologis requests that Yorkville accept 1 loading space for each data center facility, and waive any requirement for further loading space accommodation. 5) Cross Access (UDO Sec. 10-5-1(F)): The UDO requires cross access between properties; however, based on security concerns associated with data center projects and the general lack of development adjacent to the Subject Property, Prologis asks Yorkville to waive this requirement. 6) Pedestrian Circulation (UDO Sec. 10-5-1(N)): Prologis plans to provide sufficient pedestrian walkways between parking lots and data center facilities; however, Prologis does not plan to provide pedestrian connections between data center facilities. In Prologis’ experience, employees and visitors infrequently visit more than one data center facility at a time. Further, the sheer size of the Subject Property and anticipated security protocols makes it unlikely that visitors would travel on foot between data center facilities. Prologis asks Yorkville to waive this requirement. 7) Bicycle Parking (UDO Sec. 10-5-1(O)): The Subject Property’s location eliminates any reasonable likelihood that bike parking would receive any meaningful, regular use. Prologis requests that Yorkville waive bike parking requirements for the Subject Property. 8) Landscaping (UDO Sec. 10-5-3): The UDO requires significant landscaping to be installed in and around parking lots and around building foundations. The secure nature of the proposed campus reduces the value received when such landscaping is provided in a public-facing development. In place of interior landscape requirements, Prologis proposes to install enhanced landscaping along those parts of the Subject Property’s perimeter that are adjacent to public streets (i.e., Eldamain Road, Galena Road, Corneils Road, and Beecher Road). 9) Mechanical Unit Screening (UDO Sec. 10-5-4(B) and (C)): The UDO requires ground and roof mounted mechanical units to be screened. The development will feature primarily ground mounted units, as is customary in data center developments, but there will also be rooftop mechanical units. Recognizing that these units will be set back far from any public roadway, Prologis seeks Yorkville’s approval of the following screening standards: (1) vinyl fencing for ground mounted units equal to the height of the generator unit, excluding stacks protruding above the generator; and (2) no screening for rooftop units. 10) Fences (UDO Sec. 10-5-5): The UDO prohibits fences from extending beyond the front plane of the primary building façade and limits fence height to no more than 8 feet. Prologis seeks Yorkville’s approval of fencing in the locations identified on the preliminary plan, portions of which are located closer to the right of way than the building facade. ANCEL GLINK March 14, 2025 Page 11 CHICAGO ● VERNON HILLS ● NAPERVILLE ● CRYSTAL LAKE ● BLOOMINGTON Prologis also seeks approval to construct fences measuring up to 12 feet in height to ensure the Subject Property is appropriately secured. 11) Appearance Standards (UDO Sec. 10-5-8-(4)): The UDO provides that industrial buildings must meet certain design standards, including requiring that any building measuring longer than 100 feet must incorporate recesses along at least 30% of the façade facing a street. Recognizing that the data center facilities are set back significantly from adjacent rights of way, Prologis seeks to waive appearance standards in exchange for Prologis’ commitment to construct the buildings of masonry, pre-cast materials. 12) Frontage on a Public Street (UDO Sec. 10-7-2): The UDO requires all new lots abut a public street. Acknowledging that Prologis is proposing a secure data center campus primarily served by private drives, Prologis asks Yorkville to waive this requirement and approve – in the future – subdivision of the Subject Property into lots that Prologis reasonably determines sufficient to facilitate the use, operation, maintenance, and disposition of the Subject Property. 13) Street Standards (UDO Sec. 10-7-3 and 10-7-4): The UDO establishes standards for street construction and circulation. Excluding the realigned Beecher Road, the proposed development does not include new streets. Accordingly, Prologis asks Yorkville to waive these requirements. e. Incentive Requests Prologis plans to invest significantly in constructing water and wastewater extensions and a half mile of new public right of way – East Beecher Road. This public infrastructure will both support Prologis’ development and accelerate Yorkville’s realization of the land use goals set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. Among other things, Prologis’ investment will eliminate the need for a large, up-front, investment in regional-scale public infrastructure and “set the stage” for redevelopment that would otherwise not be feasible. Neighboring properties and Yorkville as a whole will benefit significantly from Prologis’ investment in public infrastructure. Prologis proposes entering into a public utility infrastructure agreement allowing Prologis to recover its up-front investment in public improvements over a period of 20 years. There are two funding sources for reimbursement: (1) a share of the utility tax generated by the Subject Property; and (2) recapture fees paid by properties that benefit from the improvements Prologis constructs. The agreement will also provide reasonable assurances regarding water capacity to ensure Prologis can fully develop the Subject Property. Prologis would appreciate an opportunity to further discuss with Yorkville the specific terms of this agreement. III. Conclusion Prologis respectfully requests Yorkville approve its application for annexation and development to facilitate the future redevelopment of the Subject Property. Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions. ANCEL GLINK March 14, 2025 Page 12 CHICAGO ● VERNON HILLS ● NAPERVILLE ● CRYSTAL LAKE ● BLOOMINGTON Sincerely, Gregory W. Jones cc: JC Witt, Prologis (via e-mail) Katie Fraser, Prologis (via e-mail) Enclosures VICINITY MAPSITE LOCATION MAP Project Steel (Yorkville) PLANO KENDALL COUNTY IL BRISTOL A EXHIBIT B Date: 5/16/2025 Time: 08:46 User: pdravet Style Table: Langan.stb Layout: CP-01 Document Code:CP01-541061101-0102-CS101-0101 www.langan.com 200 W Madison Street, Suite 1920 Chicago, IL 60606 T: 312.547.7700 F: 312.547.7701 ©Langan2025 ™ Date: 5/15/2025 Time: 10:39 User: sdolan Style Table: Langan.stb Layout: LP101 Document Code:CP01-541061101-0102-LP101-0101 www.langan.com 200 W Madison Street, Suite 1920 Chicago, IL 60606 T: 312.547.7700 F: 312.547.7701 ©Langan2025 Technical Memorandum 200 West Madison Street, Suite 1920 Chicago, IL 60606 T: 312.547.7700 F: 312.547.7701 To: Bradley P. Sanderson P.E., City of Yorkville From: Christopher A. Prisk, P.E., PTOE CC: Timothy O’Neill, P.E. Date: March 14, 2025 Re: Trip Generation Memorandum Project Steel City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Langan Project No.: 541061101 Project Overview The proposed Project Steel data center campus is anticipated to consist of 24,379,100 gross square foot (GSF) data center buildings located between, Galena Road, Eldamain Road, and Corneils Road in the city of Yorkville, Illinois. The proposed campus is anticipated to be constructed over three phases, with phase one comprising of seven buildings, phase two comprising of nine buildings, and phase three including the remaining eight buildings. The proposed development includes two full access driveways. The first driveway, associated with Phase 1, is proposed along Corneils Road via Beecher Road. The second driveway, associated with Phases 2 and 3, is proposed along Eldamain Road. As part of the development, Beecher Road will be realigned so that the north leg connects to Corneils Road east of its existing connection. The preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) site plan is included as Figure 1. Trip Generation ITE Methodology Trip generation for proposed developments are typically calculated using data contained in the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). According to the trip generation calculations the anticipated trips for each phase of the development is as follows: • Phase 1 – Seven Buildings o 292 AM Peak Hour trips (161 In, 131 Out) o 239 PM Peak Hour trips (72 In, 167 Out) o 2,627 ADT • Phase 2 – Nine Buildings o 375 AM Peak Hour trips (206 In, 169 Out) o 307 PM Peak Hour trips (92 In, 215 Out) o 3,378 ADT Technical Memorandum Trip Generation Memorandum Project Steel Langan Project No.: 541061101 March 14, 2025 - Page 2 of 3 • Phase 3 – Eight Buildings o 334 AM Peak Hour trips (184 In, 150 Out) o 239 PM Peak Hour trips (82 In, 191 Out) o 3,002 ADT The resulting total trip generation for all three phases of the data center campus is 1,001 AM Peak Hour trips (551 In, 450 Out), 819 PM Peak Hour trips (246 In, 573 Out), and 9,007 average daily trips. These trip generation calculations are summarized in Table 1A. It should be noted that the trip generation data for data centers (Land use code [LUC] 160) contained within the 11th Edition of the Trip Generation Manual contains few data points in the AM and PM peak hour of adjacent street windows. Additionally, the information is from the 2010s and for a rapidly developing technology, the trip generation data should not be assumed representative of modern data center uses. As such, the client has provided employment information and shift scheduling for the purposes of calculating trip generation. Client Site-Specific Methodology Each data center building is anticipated to require a staff of 30 people split amongst shifts to provided 24/7 coverage. The first shift, the morning shift, is anticipated to contain 50% of the staff and will run between 6:00 AM and 2:00PM. The afternoon shift is anticipated to contain 25% of the total employees and will run between 12:00 PM and 8:00PM. Finally, the remaining 25% of employees will work the night shift from 8:00PM - 8:00 AM. Given these shift times, the majority of traffic generated by the campus will occur outside the AM and PM adjacent street windows. Assuming all staff trips will be made in single occupancy vehicles, the resulting trip generation for each phase is anticipated to be as follows: • Phase 1 – Seven Buildings o 56 AM Peak Hour trips (0 In, 56 Out) o 0 PM Peak Hour trips (0 In, 0 Out) o 420 ADT • Phase 2 – Nine Buildings o 72 AM Peak Hour trips (0 In, 72 Out) o 0 PM Peak Hour trips (0 In, 0 Out) o 540 ADT • Phase 3 – Eight Buildings o 64 AM Peak Hour trips (0 In, 64 Out) o 0PM Peak Hour trips (0 In, 0 Out) o 480 ADT Combing all three phases, the proposed 24 building data center campus is anticipated to generate 192 AM Peak Hour Trips (0 In, 192 Out), 0 PM Peak Hour trips, and 1,440 Average Daily trips based on the client’s site-specific methodology. The trip generation calculations using the campus employment information are summarized in Table 1B. Technical Memorandum Trip Generation Memorandum Project Steel Langan Project No.: 541061101 March 14, 2025 - Page 3 of 3 Conclusions Given the potential short comings in the ITE trip generation data, it is recommended that the trip generation projections based on the client’s site-specific methodology be used for traffic study evaluations and / or analyses. Using these projections, the proposed Project Steel development is anticipated to generate over 100 trips during the AM peak hour of adjacent street following the completion of the majority of phase two. The city of Yorkville does not appear to post trip generation thresholds for traffic impact studies. Given that the users for this development have not yet been identified, we propose that if a TIS is deemed required, it shall be completed in the Final PUD Process. That will ensure accurate employee data and traffic counts for the proposed users are utilized. This will ensure appropriate traffic mitigations and improvements are implemented for each phase of the project. FIGURES Figure 1 – Preliminary PUD Site Plan Figure 2 – Study Intersections Date: 3/14/2025 Time: 11:17 User: pdravet Style Table: Langan.stb Layout: CP-01 Document Code:CP01-541061101-0102-CS101-0101 www.langan.com 200 W Madison Street, Suite 1920 Chicago, IL 60606 T: 312.547.7700 F: 312.547.7701 ©Langan2025 TABLES Table 1A – ITE Trip Generation Table 1B – Client Site-Specific Trip Generation IMPASSE II ® High Security Steel Palisade Fence AMERISTARPERIMETER.COM | 800-321-8724 2 AMERISTARPERIMETER.COM | 800-321-8724 IMPASSE II® HIGH SECURITY STEEL PALISADE FENCE Ameristar is committed to providing products that meet the Buy American Act. Ameristar products have the opportunity to earn LEED points. Conforms to IEEE grounding standards.The SAFETY Act, created by the US Department of Homeland Security, manages risks and litigation related to acts of terrorism. 3IMPASSE II® Maintaining a secure perimeter is your first line of defense against potential threats. Impasse II fence systems serve as a visual deterrent backed with heavy steel components that give a higher level of protection compared to the traditional chain link or architectural mesh fence alternatives. Primary applications Military Sites Government Facilities Petroleum & Chemical Facilities Power Plants & Substations Airports Data Centers Ports of Entry Water Treatment & Storage UNPARALLELED PROTECTION 4 AMERISTARPERIMETER.COM | 800-321-8724 TRIDENT™GAUNTLET™STRONGHOLD™ SCALABLE DESIGN STYLESTRIDENT™ 5IMPASSE II® 2-RAIL PANELS Available in 6', 7' & 8' heights 3-RAIL PANELS Available in 6', 7', 8', 9' & 10' heights BLACK BRONZE SAND WHITECOLORS Refer to color sample for actual color Custom colors also available.6' not available in Gauntlet PALES RAILS I-BEAM POSTS HEIGHTS 2.75" W X 14 GA. 2" X 2" X 11 GA. 3" X 2.75" X 12 GA. 4" X 2.75" X 11 GA. 6', 7', 8', 9', 10' STRONGHOLD™ GAUNTLET™PANELS 6 AMERISTARPERIMETER.COM | 800-321-8724 PRIVACY SCREENING OPTION A security fence should cover multiple aspects of perimeter security, which is why Ameristar created the steel privacy screening option for its Impasse high security fence system. Secured by each adjacent pale, the overlapping design achieves the maximum level of opacity for visual screening. ANTI-SCALE OPTION The Impasse II Anti-Scale fence system has decreased pale spacing, which deters climbing and delays those trying to cut or pry through the fence. 7IMPASSE II® EXODUS Egress & ingress requirements are unique to each application. Managing traffic flow & usage demands are of the utmost importance, which is why Impasse II is manufactured in a variety of gate types built to balance function, security & beauty. Ameristar Traverse™ & Passport™ sliding gates perfectly match the perimeter fence system to create a seamless & stunning design while exuding a commanding presence of security built to unite perimeter and entry. TRAVERSE ™ PASSPORT ™ SLIDE AND SWING GATES 8 AMERISTARPERIMETER.COM | 800-321-8724 PRE-TREATMENT THE INDUSTRY STANDARD SINCE 1992 PERMACOAT ™ In our unique PermaCoat process, our pre-galvanized steel base undergoes an 11-stage cleansing and preparation process. PermaCoat's corrosion resistance exceeds that of painted surfaces with a "no-mar" polyester powder top coat. This dual coating not only withstands weathering but also reduces scratch and burnishing marks often seen during shipping. CORROSION TESTING Corrosion occurs more easily without the proper preparation and protection, which is why Ameristar has put our fence products to the test based on ASTM B117 standards. The results speak for themselves. ALKALINE WASH Cleans metal for proper adhesion of zinc phosphate 1 2 FIXIDINE RINSE Rinses excess alkaline prior to zinc phosphate application PAINTED STEEL 100 HOURS PRIMED & PAINTED STEEL 168 HOURS CORROSION-PROCESS Impasse II is backed by over 30 years of excellence in the fencing industry. 9IMPASSE II®DOUBLE COATINGAfter these 7 stages, the steel surface will be completely prepped for the next 4 coating stages by removing everything that inhibits proper adhesion. EPOXY POWDER COAT Epoxy powder is electrostatically applied 8 EPOXY GEL OVEN Powder is gelled & cured to finish coat 9 POLYESTER POWDER TGIC powder is electro-statically applied 10 FINISH CURING OVEN Seals finish for years of maintenance-free use 11 CLEAR WATER RINSE A bit of clean H2O to prep for the next phase 4 7 DRYING OVEN Eliminates all moisture prior to double coating 6 CLEAR WATER RINSE Final wash in H2O to remove any excess debris or particles 5 NON-CHROMATE SEAL Barrier to prevent moisture from reaching base metal PHOSPHATE Corrosion resistant layer that assists in bonding powder coating 3 PERMACOAT PROCESS Phosphate + Epoxy Powder Coat + Polyester Powder Coat 3,500 HOURS SINGLE COAT PROCESS Iron Phosphate + Polyester Powder Coat 200 HOURS SINGLE COAT PROCESS Phosphate + Polyester Powder Coat 1,500 HOURS 10 AMERISTARPERIMETER.COM | 800-321-8724 STAIR-STEPPING PANELS RACKABLE VS STAIR-STEP Biasability at a minimum of 25% that requires no additional assembly. This unique feature eliminates unsightly stair-stepping panels. FULLY RACKABLE PANELS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION The Impasse II framework is a raceway for wiring, conduits, and/or security cabling required around the perimeter of a project. This integrated design eliminates the need for costly trenching and boring, becoming a value-added solution for perimeter security upgrades. (Inside of rail shown above / view from protected side) When installing these security elements, use Impasse II as a platform: Communication & Video Cables Intrusion Detection / Fiber Optic Cables Access Control Wiring Conduits Anti-Ram Cabling (Stalwart) SECURITY FASTENER Security fastener secures the rail and deters removal by typical tools POST CAP Cast aluminum cap adds beauty and provides closure I-BEAM POST Specifically formed I-beam; pre-punched for rail attachment with pass through integrated design features HIGH STRENGTH RAIL Specifically formed for strength through architectural shape; lower lip contoured to conceal and carry security elements such as anti-ram cabling and IDS. STEEL PALES Specifically formed high strength corrugated architectural shape resists prying or bending; bolt holes are recessed to prevent bolt head from chiseling 11IMPASSE II® ARCHITECTURAL SUPPORT AND SOLUTION SERVICES Ameristar’s Project Solution Specialists are experienced in every facet of perimeter security design. Our goal is to assist the architectural community in finding the best perimeter and entry solutions for their projects. Services Extensive library of project photos BIM & CAD drawings Architectural specifications Project budget quotes ANTI-RAM BARRIER & IMPASSE II Stalwart integrates with Impasse II to create a high security fence system with anti-ram capabilities. Together, they form a crash-rated barrier, ensuring the highest level of protection. Stalwart IS is a great visual deterrent that delivers strength and fortitude to keep any assailant from easily breaching the perimeter. Stalwart offers multiple anti-ram ratings. Each installation can be designed with the most appropriate stand-off distance from the assets. M50 M40 M30 PU60 PU50 PU30 K12 K8 K4 #9718 | 05/2025 AMERISTARPERIMETER.COM | 800-321-8724 Scan to learn more about Impasse II® Why Choose Ameristar? KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE For over 40 years, we’ve delivered aesthetically pleasing, high-quality and innovative fencing products with superior design strength and easy installation. PROVEN CAPABILITIES Our integrated in-house processes, extensive raw materials and finished goods inventory translate into quality, on-time delivery. INDUSTRY LEADERSHIP We continually raise the bar in manufacturing customer-focused solutions. Our high standards produce premium products that go beyond merely meeting minimum industry standards. 1 To: Krysti Barksdale-Noble From: Katie Fraser, JC Witt Date: May 16, 2025 Subject: Response to Plan Council Meeting Follow-Up Letter Dear Krysti, Thank you and all the staff at the City of Yorkville for your time on April 24, 2025. Below are responses to the individual comments/feedback items that were provided in the letter dated April 28, 2025. We look forward to further discussion and collaboration with you and your colleagues regarding these matters. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns. GENERAL APPLICATION COMMENTS: Item 1: The petitioner has provided ownership authorization for submitted applications for the parcels owned by George Ostreko Jr. (#02-07-200-010, #02-07-200-001, and #02-07-200-008) and Mary Auer (#02-07100-008 and 02-06-400-005). Item 2: The petitioner shall provide the remaining ownership authorization from property owner Jerry G. and Marilee Foltz (#02-07-200-009). PLD Response: Owner authorization form will be provided upon receipt. PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN COMMENTS: Item 3: The petitioner will provide dimensioned distances in feet (US) of proposed data center buildings/structures to the adjacent property lines on a revised Site Plan. PLD Response: Requested dimensions will be added to the site plan. Item 4: The petitioner will provide dimensioned distances in feet (US) of proposed data center buildings/structures to the nearest existing residential or commercial structures on a revised Site Plan. PLD Response: Requested dimensions will be added to the site plan. 2 Item 5: The petitioner shall provide a “2,000 ft. Residence District Building Height Restriction Zone” buffer on the Preliminary PUD Plan indicating which proposed data center buildings will fall within this zone. PLD Response: Requested buffer will be added to the Preliminary PUD Plan. Item 6: The petitioner will confirm if they intend to accommodate the proposed realignment of E. Beecher Road as recommended by the City Engineer and Public Works Director. PLD Response: Petitioner requests additional meeting with City Engineer and Public Works Director to discuss East Beecher Road Realignment. PLD strongly prefers option 5 or 5A. a. If so, the petitioner will address roadway alignments recommended by City Engineer on a revised Site Plan. PLD Response: Site plan will be revised following meeting with City Engineer and Public Works Director. Item 7: The petitioner will confirm whether they still wish to pursue the vacation of W. Beecher Road and, if so, explain how access will be provided to the approximately 18-acre parcel located south of Galena Road (#02-06-400- 001), which is included in the proposed Project Cardinal development. PLD Response: PLD proposes to vacate West Beecher Road. The 18-acre parcel located east of the site (“Neighboring Property”) can add access off of Galena Road, either where the existing Beecher Road Access currently is or at a new access point further to the east. The revised site plan eliminates the proposed curb cut adjacent to the Neighboring Property; this should alleviate concerns regarding proximity of curb cuts on Galena Road. Item 8: The petitioner will indicate the recommended easements for trails and proposed sidewalks on an updated Site Plan. PLD Response: Proposed trails have been added to the site plan. Item 9: The petitioner will verify the correct parking count on the Site Plan. PLD Response: Parking count will be verified on the revised site plan. Item 10: The petitioner will provide a traffic study and traffic management plan. PLD Response: PLD will provide a traffic study and traffic management plan. Scoping for traffic study will require input from City Engineer and Public Works Director. 3 Item 11: The petitioner will provide a revised Landscape Plan indicating the proposed areas they seek relief from the recommended eight (8) foot tall berm within the required 100-foot landscape buffer. Architectural renderings or illustrative view shed exhibits are highly recommended to demonstrate the proposed vegetative screening in the areas seeking relief. PLD Response: PLD intends to work with the City on the appropriate location for berms based on sound and viewsheds. Item 12: The petitioner will provide architectural building elevation plans indicating proposed building materials and dimensions. The plans shall also illustrate greater architectural articulation, variation in materials, and a more dynamic color palette to those buildings visible from Eldamain, E. Beecher and Galena Roads. PLD Response: Project architect is working on generating the requested building elevations. PLD intends to have elevations completed ahead of the scheduled EDC meeting. Item 13: The petitioner will provide a pre-construction/existing conditions noise study of subject property and narrative of mitigation steps they intend to employ to ensure compliance with the City’s noise ordinance standards. PLD Response: PLD is actively working to identify a consultant to perform the requested baseline noise study. The proposed plan will be communicated to the city ahead of execution to confirm the city requirement is being satisfied. Item 14: The petitioner will provide details on the fence type and material. PLD Response: Cut sheets of the proposed fence type and material have been provided with this response. Item 15: The petitioner will provide additional narrative or details regarding the proposed use of ion-lithium batteries within the data center campus structures. PLD Response: Project team is working on the requested narrative for lithium batteries. Additional meeting is requested with the fire department. DEVELOPMENT OFFSETS: Item 16: The petitioner is requested to provide the planned average and maximum day water use for the development. The anticipated sanitary sewer flows should also be provided. These numbers will then be used to determine the infrastructure needed to serve this development. PLD Response: Revised water estimates will be provided ahead of EDC meeting date. 4 Item 17: The petitioner is requested to provide estimates of utility taxes and property taxes expected to be generated per building. PLD Response: PLD is working on utility and property tax estimates and will provide upon completion. Item 18: Regarding the requested contributions for entryway/gateway signage, regional park development, and other discussed community investments, staff plans to provide a total estimated amount and a per-acre fee for each data center developer, proportionate to the scale and impact of their respective developments. A detailed estimate from the City is forthcoming and will be provided to the petitioner in advance of the EDC meeting for their consideration. PLD Response: Noted. COMMUNITY MEETING COMMENTS: Item 19: While not discussed in the meeting, per Section 10-8-5-B-1-a of the Unified Development Ordinance, a community meeting conducted by the petitioner of area/neighborhood property owners, explaining the proposed data center campus development, at their own expense and at a location of their choosing may be required prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing date. PLD Response: Community meeting will be scheduled ahead of City Council hearing date. b. Accordingly, the petitioner will reach out to the various homeowners’ adjacent properties along Eldamain Road, E. Beecher Road, Corneils Road, and residents within the Caledonia residential subdivision approximately 0.5 miles southeast of the proposed data center campus. PLD Response: Noted. c. This outreach will need to occur prior to the City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) public hearings providing an opportunity to present the plan and gather feedback from residents. PLD Response: Noted. Soundscape Engineering 3711 N. Ravenswood Ave., Ste. 104 • Chicago, IL 60613 • (312) 436-0032 729 W. Ann Arbor Trl., Ste. 150 • Plymouth, MI 48170 • (734) 418-8663 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com MEMORANDUM April 7, 2025 To: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director, United City of Yorkville, knoble@yorkville.il.us From: Aimee Lalime, INCE Bd. Cert. Nathan Sevener, INCE Bd. Cert. Re: Project Steel Proposed Three-Phase Data Center Campus and On-site Substations Development Preliminary Comments on Potential Noise Transmission to the Community Per Soundscape Engineering’s consulting services contract with the United City of Yorkville, we are providing the following preliminary comments regarding potential noise transmission from the proposed three-phase development of a data center campus with on-site substations to the surrounding community. At this time, there is insufficient Project information available to allow calculation of noise transmission from the proposed Development to the surrounding community. However, based on our experience, review of the Preliminary PUD Plan dated 3/14/25, and the uses of the properties near the proposed site, we can provide the following comments for your consideration. 1. Chapter 4 of the Yorkville Code of Ordinances restricts noise transmission to both residential and commercial land uses. The limit on sound transmission to residential land uses during the nighttime is the most restrictive (50 dBA). Since the proposed Data Center Campus can be expected to operate during both daytime and nighttime, nighttime sound level limits will need to be considered when evaluating noise transmission from the proposed Data Center Campus. 2. In our experience, the primary noise sources associated with Data Centers are the electrical power generators and the cooling equipment. 3. The Applicant should note, in particular, that the Noise Ordinance includes a 10 dB sound level limit penalty for noise that is tonal in character. Some types of cooling equipment, such as chillers, can emit tonal noise. 4. There is a large residential development within Yorkville limits located approximately 2700 ft Southeast of the closest Project Steel building shown in the preliminary PUD (on Ryan Drive, Caledonia Drive, and Lauren Drive). The distance between the proposed data center buildings and these residences will be beneficial, and we expect the project can meet the noise ordinance at this distance with planning and if noise mitigation measures are implemented. 5. The closest residential land use within the City of Yorkville is 1400 feet east of the nearest data center building, located at 1414 Eldamain Road. For properties at this distance, it may be difficult for the Data Center Campus to comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance. Project Steel Data Center – Preliminary Comments April 7, 2025 SE No. 2311 Page 2 of 2 Soundscape Engineering 3711 N. Ravenswood Ave., Ste. 104 • Chicago, IL 60613 • (312) 436-0032 729 W. Ann Arbor Trl., Ste. 150 • Plymouth, MI 48170 • (734) 418-8663 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com 6. Based on our noise control engineering experience and review of similar-sized data center campuses, the project will need to consider noise control early in the design, using thoughtful site planning, locating cooling equipment and generators as far as possible from residents, and selecting low-noise equipment. Since the nighttime ordinance is more stringent, it may be necessary for some of the equipment to be programmed to operate at quieter, but less efficient, operating modes during nighttime hours. In addition to equipment selection, load settings, and siting, meeting the noise ordinance may also require noise control screening, compressor wraps, or other approaches for the outdoor cooling equipment. Noise control enclosures and mufflers will most likely be needed for the generators. 7. The Applicant should provide a noise impact assessment report for review by the City. The report should describe how the assessment was performed, list the specific noise-generating equipment associated with operation of the Data Center Campus and On-site Substation, describe any noise control approaches and equipment that will be included in the project design, and confirm that the City’s noise ordinance will be met. Noise source data for the cooling equipment shall be based on actual sound level measurements of the specific equipment planned for the project, made in accordance with nationally recognized standards, not on interpolated, extrapolated, or otherwise calculated sound levels. 8. The City should consider whether it wishes to require the applicant to perform post-construction acoustic testing to demonstrate compliance with the noise ordinance, potentially at completion of each project phase. 9. We understand that some members of the community are concerned about noise emissions from the planned data center campus. The community noise ordinance protects Yorkville residents by limiting noise transmission to residential land uses to 60 dBA during the day and 50 dBA at night. In addition, tonal noise sources are required to be 10 dBA below those values (50 dBA daytime and 40 dBA at night). For reference, the Route 47 traffic noise at the closest Bristol Bay condos (400’ from the roadway) is estimated to be as low as 55 dBA at night and as high as 63 dBA during the day. This suggests that residences located near busy roadways will not experience a significant impact from data center noise. 10. Our comments are only in relation to the City of Yorkville noise ordinance and do not consider compliance relative to any other jurisdictions, including Kendall County or the Illinois Pollution Control Board. 11. Similarly, our comments are focused on residential and commercial land uses that are currently within the City of Yorkville. There are, however, several single-family residences located very near the proposed development that are not currently within the City of Yorkville. These residences are located immediately across the road to the West, South, and East of the proposed Data Center Campus on Eldamain, Corneils, and East Beecher Roads. **END OF MEMORANDUM** Soundscape Engineering 3711 N. Ravenswood Ave., Ste. 104 • Chicago, IL 60613 • (312) 436-0032 729 W. Ann Arbor Trl., Ste. 150 • Plymouth, MI 48170 • (734) 418-8663 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com MEMORANDUM April 28, 2025 To: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director, United City of Yorkville, knoble@yorkville.il.us From: Aimee Lalime, INCE Bd. Cert. Nathan Sevener, INCE Bd. Cert. Re: Project Steel Proposed Data Center Campus and On-site Substations Development Follow-Up to Acoustics Questions during April 24th Plan Council Meeting On April 24, 2025, the City of Yorkville hosted a pre-plan meeting and a Plan Council meeting to discuss the proposed Project Cardinal Data Center Campus and on-site substation development. Here are our follow-up comments in responses to our acoustics-related discussion: 1. Continuous Noise Monitoring: The City is interested in requiring continuous noise monitoring during the construction and operation of the Project Steel and Project Cardinal data centers. We spoke with two sound level meter manufacturers, NTi and Larson Davis, regarding their continuous noise monitor offerings. The estimated cost for the hardware is $12,000 - $25,000 per monitor. This includes the purchase of a sound level meter, microphone, outdoor case, permanent mounting, solar power, and modem. There are also labor costs associated with site selection, installation coordination, setup, training, and data review. Let us know if you would like us to investigate further. 2. Equipment Placement: As discussed in the Plan Council meeting, the best location for mechanical equipment is on the side of the building opposite the residents, with the rooftop behind sound barrier screens being the next best location. The worst location is on the side of the building closest to residents. It is not necessary to restrict the project from mounting equipment on the roof, as long as the project demonstrates that the ordinance is fully met. 3. Operational Conditions: We recommend an update to item 31.kk.ii in the Plan Council Packet. Instead of requiring the operational noise levels to not exceed the pre-development baseline, we recommend requiring the project to meet the noise ordinance. Matching the pre-development baseline may be impractical for a project of this scale, and the ordinance is designed to balance the city’s needs for development and protect residents from excessive noise. **END OF MEMORANDUM** 1 I have reviewed the completed applications for Annexation, Rezone, Planned Unit Development (PUD), Preliminary PUD Plan and Project Narrative for Project Steel received March 14, 2025 as submitted by Ancel Glink P.C., attorney, on behalf of Prologis, L.P., petitioner, as well as a conceptual Preliminary PUD Plan dated 03/14/25, Proposed Phasing Schedule, Conceptual Landscape Plan dated 03/14/25, a Trip Generation Memorandum and exterior building renderings all prepared by Langan. The petitioner, as contract purchaser, along with property owner Rosenwinkel Family Trust Et Al, is seeking approval for the annexation of sixteen (16) parcels totaling 540 acres (subject property). These parcels will be part of a master planned high-tech data center campus. The petitioner also requests the rezoning of the subject property to within the M-2 General Manufacturing District, special use authorization for a Planned Unit Development (PUD), and approval of a preliminary PUD Plan which involves the phased construction of twenty-four (24) two-story data center buildings totaling approximately 9.5 million square feet, three (3) electrical substations, associated stormwater detention basins, equipment yards, and a proposed right-of-way vacation of W. Beecher Road. The plan proposes three (3) phases of development with each phase of development including between 7-9 data center buildings, one (1) substation, and eight (8) associated stormwater basins. If approved, construction is anticipated to begin in summer of 2027, with full campus buildout happening over the course of 20 years. As part of the petitioner’s application for Planned Unit Development (PUD), there is a request for thirteen (13) deviations to the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) from the base M-2 General Manufacturing District standards related to bulk and dimensional regulations; energy industrial use requirements; cross access; minimum parking requirements; pedestrian circulation; bicycle parking; off-street loading space requirements; landscaping; screening of mechanical units; fencing; appearance standards; lots; street design improvements and connectivity requirements. Each of these requested deviations will be detailed separately in this review memo under subsequent headings. Based upon my review of the application documents and provided plans, I have compiled the following comments: GENERAL APPLICATION COMMENTS: 1. Staff has reviewed the list of property owners of the subject property prepared by the petitioner and submitted as part of the application and noted several owners of record’s affidavit as part of the aforementioned petitions were not included. a. According to the Kendall County tax records the owner of parcels #02-07-200-010, - 001,and -008 is GEORGE OSTREKO JR ET AL; owner of parcels 02-07-100-008 and 02-06-400-005 is MARY AUER; and the owner of parcel 02-07-200-009 is JERRY G. MARILEE FOLTZ. b. Please have the owners of record execute a notarized application stating they are party to the annexation, rezoning, PUD and Preliminary PUD Plan application requests. Memorandum To: Plan Council From: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Date: April 2, 2025 Subject: PZC 2025-07 Project Steel – Annex, Rezone, PUD & Prelim Plan SEC of Galena Road & Eldamain Road east toward E. Beecher Road Proposed Data Center Campus and On-Site Substation Development 2 GENERAL ANNEXATION COMMENTS: 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY - The subject property area for the proposed data center campus is comprised of sixteen (16) unincorporated parcels totaling 540-acres as broken down below: PIN ACRES OWNER JURISDICTION 02-06-300-011 142.82 ROSENWINKEL FAMILY TRUST ET AL 501 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-100-007 55.89 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-300-002 33.24 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-400-002 34.18 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-400-003 41.97 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-400-004 36.71 UNINCORPORATED 02-08-300-004 8.27 UNINCORPORATED 02-08-100-007 82.31 UNINCORPORATED 02-18-200-002 0.19 UNINCORPORATED 02-18-200-003 2.01 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-200-010 25.40 GEORGE JR OSTREKO ET AL UNINCORPORATED 02-07-200-001 1.24 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-200-008 52.30 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-100-008 9.89 MARY AUER UNINCORPORATED 02-06-400-005 12.48 UNINCORPORATED 02-07-200-009 1.01 JERRY G MARILEE FOLTZ UNINCORPORATED TOTAL 539.91 3. PLAT OF ANNEXATION – A plat of annexation shall be an exhibit to the annexing ordinance. The city engineer will prepare the exhibit. 4. CONTIGUITY – Contiguity with the current City of Yorkville corporate boundaries is established through the Hagemann and Bright Farms parcels to the west, Westbury South Village to the south, and the Bennett and Yorkville Renewables Solar Farm properties along with Westbury East Village to the east. 5. ANNEXATION AGREEMENT – The petitioner states they anticipate entering into an annexation agreement with the City “containing mutually beneficial terms governing the Subject Property’s annexation and future development.” GENERAL ZONING COMMENTS: 6. SUBJECT PROPERTY ZONING – The petitioner is seeking to rezone all sixteen (16) parcels upon annexation within the subject area to M-2 General Manufacturing District. a. Per Section 10-3-4 of the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), any territory annexed to the city shall automatically be classified within the R-1 Single- Family Suburban Residential District. Therefore, the petitioner is seeking rezoning the parcels to be annexed to the M-2 General Manufacturing District. 7. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING - The following is a summary of the current zoning classifications and land uses of the properties immediately surrounding the subject site. This information provides context for the existing development patterns in the area and helps assess the compatibility of the proposed use with adjacent properties and overall community planning objectives: 3 b. Petitioner has provided written responses to the Standards for Rezoning which will be entered into the record during the public hearing process. 8. PERMITTED USES – Per Table 10-3-12 (B) of the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), “data center” and “electric substation” are permitted land uses in the M-2 General Manufacturing District. Data centers are defined as Energy Industrial Uses per Table 10-3-12(B) in the Unified Development Ordinance. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOMEMT (PUD) COMMENTS: 9. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – Section 10-8-8 of City’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) establishes standards for Planned Unit Development (PUDs). PUDs are allowed to modify standards of the base district as long as the requested modifications are specifically identified and demonstrates how each allowance is compatible with surrounding development, is necessary for proper development of the site, and is aligned with at least one (1) modification standard found in Section 10-8-8D of the UDO. c. An application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) was not included in the packet submittal. However, responses to the PUD standards were provided in the narrative prepared by Gregory W. Jones of Ancel Glink. i. Staff recommends a formal application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) be provided which identifies at least one (1) modification standard found in Section 10-8-8D of the UDO. d. Staff recommends the petitioner consider the following modification standards which may be applicable to the proposed data center campus development: Zoning Land Use North A-1 (Kendall County) M-1 Limited Manufacturing (Kendall County) M-3 Manufacturing Special Use (Kendall County) Galena Road (Rte. 30) Farmland Agricultural Earth Materials Extraction, Processing and Site Transportation Land Use East A-1 Agricultural (Kendall County) A-1 Agricultural Special Use (Kendall County) A-1 Agricultural Special Use (Yorkville) R-2 Single-Family Traditional District Beecher Road Farmland Farmland Farmland (Solar Farms) Farmland (Westbury East Village) Transportation Land Use South A-1 Agricultural District Special Use (Kendall County) M-1/M-2 Limited/General Manufacturing (Yorkville) R-4 General Multi-Family Residence District Commonwealth Edison – Transmission Station Corneils Road Camp Mutty Paws (Dog Kennel) Bright Farms Farmland (Westbury South Village) Utility Land Use Transportation Land Use West M-2 General Manufacturing District (Yorkville) M-1 Limited Manufacturing (Kendall County) A-1 Agricultural/R-1 District (Kendall County) Eldamain Road Farmland (Hagemann) Auto Repair (Jet’s Towing) Residential Land Use Transportation Land Use 4 i. Modification Standard #11 “Funding or Construction of Public Roadways”. The Planned Unit Development includes the construction of roadways adjacent to the subject site as planned in the City of Yorkville Comprehensive Plan, Kendall County Long-Range Transportation Plan, or another transportation plan adopted by a local, County, or regional entity. 1. Staff believes this modification standard does apply, as the proposed development may be required to make roadway improvements to E. Beecher Road, Corneils Road, and at the intersection at Galena Road and E. Beecher Road. ii. Modification Standard #12 “Regional Utility Improvements”. The Planned Unit Development involves the construction of a utility improvement identified in the City or Yorkville Comprehensive Plan or other policy document adopted by a local, County, or regional entity. 1. Staff believes this modification standard does apply, as the proposed development will be required to construct and extend public utilities (water and sanitary) to the property. e. The petitioner has provided written responses to the standards for special use and for Planned Unit Development (PUD) which will be entered into the record during the public hearing process. PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN COMMENTS: 10. PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL – Per Section 10-8-6. Subdivision Procedures of the Unified Development Ordinance, approval of the Preliminary Plan is tentative only and shall be effective for a period of twelve (12) months. f. However, Section 10-8-8-H of the Unified Development Ordinance Expiration and Lapse of Approval states, any Planned Unit Development in which there has been no Building Permit issued nor any portion of the property platted after three (3) years since approval by the City Council, the Planned Unit Development shall be considered null and void and shall be brought back before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council for consideration prior to any development on the property. The underlining zoning of the Planned Unit Development shall not expire, only the Planned Unit Development overlay shall expire. g. Therefore, staff interprets the expiration of the Preliminary PUD Plan is three (3) years after approval of the Planned Unit Development if no portion of the property is final platted. 11. PROPOSED PHASING SCHEDULE – The petitioner proposes to develop the subject property in three (3) phases over an estimated twenty (20) year period, with each phase being served by its own stormwater and other infrastructure. According to the Project Steel’s narrative, construction of the first phase is anticipated to begin during the summer of 2027. Below is the proposed phase development: 5 h. Staff recommends the phasing plan consider minimizing impacts on nearby residential structures by prioritizing initial development at the farthest distance from existing residential structures. i. What is proposed for the future development of the 84 acres on the east side of proposed realigned E. Beecher Road? 12. BUILDING SETBACKS/BUILDING SEPARATION – Per the Table 10-3-9(A) Bulk and Dimensional Standards, the following compares current M-2 General Manufacturing District building setback standards with the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) requested modifications (Deviation #1): BUILDING SETBACKS REQUIRED MINIMUM SETBACKS M-2 DISTRICT PROPOSED MINIMUM SETBACKS SITE PLAN (Phase 1)* PROPOSED MINIMUM SETBACKS SITE PLAN (Phases 2-3)* FRONT YARD (Eldamain Road & Beecher Road) 25’ 80’ 150’ INTERIOR SIDE/CORNER YARDS (North – Galena Road/South- Corneils Road) Min. 10% of lot/Max. 20’ 50’ 50’ REAR YARD (ComEd Right-of-Way) 0’ 50’ 50’ *The petitioner is seeking to have the setbacks apply only to the boundary/perimeter of the subject property rather than each individual building on the site. Due to the irregularity of the subject property configuration, Eldamain Road and the proposed relocated E. Beecher Road are the established front yards, Galena and Corneils Roads are the interior side/corner yards, and the ComEd right-of-way is the established rear yard. a. It appears most buildings on the Site Plan exceed the required minimum building setbacks for the M-2 District. 1. Please provide dimensioned distances in feet (US) of proposed buildings to the adjacent property lines. b. Does the petitioner anticipate consolidating the various parcels into a single zoning lot or will the parcels be resubdivided for each building/user? 1. Regardless on the future platting of the data center campus, City Council approval will be required for any Final Plat. The petitioner is seeking a zero (0) foot building setback for all buildings within the campus- style development, as Section 10-8-6-C-6.c(6) of the Unified Development Ordinance requires building setback lines meeting the minimum standard on all lots. Staff supports this request due to the site being served primarily by internal private access drives. c. Building Separation – In consideration of the internal setback relief of buildings within the data center campus, staff recommends a minimum 500-foot building separation from the nearest data center building or structure (primary or accessory) to the nearest residential or commercial structure. 6 1. Please provide dimensioned distances in feet (US) of proposed buildings to the nearest existing residential or commercial structures. 13. ENERGY INDUSTRIAL USES - Use standards for Energy Industrial Uses are reserved for future regulations, if ever approved, under Section 10-4-10 in the Unified Development Ordinance. j. The petitioner is seeking waiver of future standards adopted being applicable to this subject property after adoption of the Planned Unit Development (Deviation #2). k. The City is currently in the process of adopting specific development standards for data center campus developments. l. Staff is open to granting a lock on future regulations under this section of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for a period of ten (10) years, provided the applicant agrees to all staff-recommended development standards outlined in this memorandum, which incorporate the proposed best practices, design guidelines, and operational requirements intended to ensure the least impactful and high-quality development across the data center campus. 14. NUCLEAR ENERGY USES – Staff requires the petitioner agree that the data center campus be strictly prohibited from using, generating, storing, or deploying nuclear energy as a power source within the City. This includes, but is not limited to, nuclear reactors, small modular reactors (SMRs), or any other nuclear-based technology. 15. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT - The M-2 District does not have a maximum building height per Table 10-3-9(A) in the Unified Development Ordinance. However, the petitioner has provided overall building heights for the proposed two-story data center buildings to top of the building’s roof and to the top of rooftop equipment. As proposed buildings will not exceed 56.5’ to top of structure and 70’ to top of rooftop equipment. m. Staff recommends a maximum overall height for data center buildings within 2,000 feet of a residential structure shall be 70 feet. No rooftop mechanical equipment will be allowed within this buffer, unless specifically approved by City Council. i. The petitioner shall provide a “2,000 ft. Residence District Building Height Restriction Zone” buffer on the Preliminary PUD Plan indicating which proposed data center buildings will fall within this zone. 16. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE – Per Section 10-3-9(A) of the Unified Development Ordinance, the maximum lot coverage for the M-2 District (inclusive of sidewalks, parking areas and all impervious surfaces) is 85% of the gross lot area. According to the Site Data Table on the Preliminary PUD Plan, lot coverage calculations are provided as 60% in Phase 1 and 70% in Phases 2 and 3. 17. VEHICULAR/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS – The site features a total of seven (7) access points, including two (2) primary access drives—one from Corneils Road and one from Eldamain Road. Additionally, there are three (3) emergency access points: one off Galena Road and two along the proposed realigned E. Beecher Road. The site also includes two (2) direct access drives—one from Galena Road serving Substation #2 and one from Corneils Road serving Substation #1. All access points connect to an internal 30-foot-wide looped roadway system, which provides 7 circulation throughout the development, linking all 24 data center buildings, associated equipment yards, three (3) substations, and nine (9) stormwater basins. ii. Will the two (2) access drives to the substations intended exclusively for the user and ComEd, and will these access points will also be locked and secured? It appears some of these access drives are outside the fenced perimeter. iii. It appears the proposed primary access points to the data center will be fenced. Will these entry points be guarded stations requiring extensive security verification before entry? iv. It is essential that realignment of E. Beecher Road remains a seamless roadway—there can be no jogs or 90-degree curves. It must function as intended in our comprehensive plan, which may necessitate the reorientation or reconfiguration of buildings near Substation 1. Additionally, the road should serve as an attractive entry to the community, with proper beautification efforts, such as landscaping, berms, setbacks, and aesthetically designed buildings facing Beecher. 1. Staff defers to City Engineer and Public Works Director regarding site access and roadway alignments. n. Cross Access – Per Section 10-5-1-F of the Unified Development Ordinance, the petitioner is seeking relief from the providing cross access between adjoining developments which minimizes access points along streets, encourages shared parking, and allows for vehicular access between land uses (Deviation #5). i. According to Section 10-5-1-F-2-c The Zoning Administrator may waive or modify the requirement for vehicular cross access on determining that such cross access is impractical or undesirable because it would require crossing a significant physical barrier or environmentally sensitive area, would create unsafe conditions, or there exists an inability to connect to adjacent property. City Council shall have the authority to waive or modify vehicular cross access requirements for all public review processes involving review by City Council. ii. Staff has concerns regarding access for adjacent parcels. The control over adjacent parcels is a key concern. Currently, Prologis does not control all parcels in the area of the roadway, making it difficult for the City to justify blocking access to W Beecher for the Hagemann parcel, as well as the vacant parcels at the southeast corner of W. Beecher and Galena Road. Therefore, at this point staff does not support this deviation. o. Pedestrian Circulation – Per Section 10-5-1-N Pedestrian Circulation Standards of the Unified Development Ordinance required off-street parking areas to on-site pedestrian circulation systems and connection to existing and future planned trails. The petitioner states that walkways between parking areas and building entrances will be provided on-site, however they seek a waiver for public access and connection to public sidewalks and bicycle trails due to the nature and security of the proposed land use (Deviation #6). i. According to Section 10-5-1-N-5, the Zoning Administrator may waive this requirement upon determining that no walkway exists, a future walkway is 8 unlikely to exist, or such connection would create a safety hazard. Staff supports the waiver. ii. In consideration of the requested waiver, staff requests the petitioner constructs and provides easements for a ten-foot (10’) multi-use walking trail on the outer perimeter of the proposed data center at the following locations: 1. Along E. Beecher Road from Corneils Road to Galena Road. 2. Along Eldamain Road to Galena Road. 3. Along Corneils Road to E. Beecher Road 18. ELDAMAIN ROAD RECAPTURE - In 2011, the City of Yorkville, City of Plano, and Kendall County entered into an intergovernmental agreement regarding the future reconstruction of Eldamain Road from Menards Distribution Center north to Galena Road (Ord. 2011-05). Kendall County agreed to bring Eldamain Road under its jurisdiction and made roadway improvements costing $6,300,000 for that portion of the roadway. The three (3) governmental entities agreed to equally share the improvements cost which are to be paid through recapture agreements from future annexed properties with frontage along Eldamain Road (refer to attached Eldamain Road Recapture Benefitted Parcels). a. The recapture amount is approximately ~161.00 per lineal foot of frontage along Eldamain Road. The estimated total recapture is approximately $295,000. Below is an estimated amount of the proposed annexed parcel which is obligated to pay per the intergovernmental agreements at time of final plat: 19. PARKING - According to the Site Plan submitted, there are 1,080 total parking spaces to be provided on the property to accommodate the proposed twenty-four (24) building data center campus and electric substation uses as detailed below: Location Sq. Ft. Provided Parking Spaces Parking Required 0.3 Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. Phase 1 Building 1 379,100 45 114 Building 2 379,100 45 114 Building 3 379,100 45 114 Building 4 379,100 45 114 Building 5 379,100 45 114 Building 6 379,100 45 114 Building 7 379,100 45 114 Phase 2 Building 8 379,100 45 114 Building 9 379,100 45 114 PARCEL ESTIMATED FRONTAGE ESTIMATED RECAPTURE 02‐06‐300‐011 ~ 1,832 linear feet $294,952 TOTAL ~ 1,832 linear feet $294,952 9 Building 10 379,100 45 114 Building 11 379,100 45 114 Building 12 379,100 45 114 Building 13 379,100 45 114 Building 14 379,100 45 114 Building 15 379,100 45 114 Building 16 379,100 45 114 Phase 3 Building 17 379,100 45 114 Building 18 379,100 45 114 Building 19 379,100 45 114 Building 20 379,100 45 114 Building 21 379,100 45 114 Building 22 379,100 45 114 Building 23 379,100 45 114 Building 24 379,100 45 114 TOTAL 9,477,500 1,080 2,736 p. Per Table 10-5-1(H)(5) Minimum Parking Requirements of the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance, staff would classify the data center campus for the purposes of off-site parking as an industrial use, which requires a minimum of 0.3 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of net floor area (NFA) for uses greater than 8,000 sq. ft. While there is no specific information provided as to the individual proposed buildings, the petitioner estimates the average building size is 379,100 sq. ft. requiring ~114 parking spaces per building, however, they contend the actual parking demand will be approximately 45 spaces per building (Deviation #3). i. Note, Preliminary PUD Plan states 45 spaces per building, while the narrative stated 47 parking spaces per building. Staff has deferred to the Preliminary PUD Plan, but the petitioner must verify the correct parking count. q. Staff has estimated the total required parking for the subject property is 2,736 spaces, including 55 ADA accessible spaces. Additionally, per Section 10-5-1K-1 of the Unified Development Ordinance, the petitioner is required to install the infrastructure for a minimum of 55 electric vehicle charging stations. i. The petitioner is proposing to provide 25 ADA accessible parking spaces and 21 E/V parking stalls. ii. Staff is not opposed to the requested shared parking request and proposed reduction in off-street parking, however, staff recommends a fee in lieu of the difference in the required electrical vehicle charging station infrastructure and provided stations (34) which will be used to install electric charging stations in the downtown or at other public facilities. r. Bicycle Parking – Per Section 10-5-1-O-2 of the Unified Development Ordinance to provision of bicycle parking is encouraged, not required, and if utilized on a development site will allow for a reduction of required off-street parking. The petitioner is seeking a waiver to not provide off-street bicycle parking (Deviation #7). i. No waiver required as it is a parking bonus mechanism, not a requirement. 10 s. Off-Street Loading – Per Section 10-5-1-Q of the Unified Development Ordinance, the number of off-street shall be determined on a case-by-case basis, and in the instance of special uses, loading berths adequate number and size to serve such use, as determined by the Zoning Administrators, shall be provided. The petitioner requests a minimum of one (1) off-street loading space per data center campus building on the subject property (Deviation #4). Staff supports the request. 20. TRAFFIC IMPACT – The petitioner has provided a Trip Generation Technical Memo prepared by Langan providing basic trip generation modeling for the proposed data center campus at full buildout. The preliminary report estimates a daily total of 1,440 trips. Staff defers to the City Engineer regarding Trip Generation Technical Memo. t. Traffic Management Plan – Staff does recommend a traffic management plan be required during construction, including a communication strategy and an on- site point of contact during construction. 21. LANDSCAPING – Section 10-5-3 establishes landscape standards for new developments. While the petitioner has not submitted a landscape plan, they are seeking relief from the minimum requirements (Deviation #8). u. Per staff’s review, the following sections of the Landscape Plan would apply: i. Section 10-5-3-C. Building Foundation Landscape Zone - All nonresidential, mixed-use, and multi-family development where a front yard setback is required, with the exception of food processing facilities regulated by the FDA, shall include landscape located at the building foundation as required by this section. Landscape required by this section shall be in addition to landscape required under other sections of this title. It is the objective of this section to provide a softening effect at the base of buildings. 1. Petitioner is seeking relief from this standard. However, plans indicate a buffer planting area around the individual data center building. a. The petitioner shall verify if the building foundation landscape zone is being met or not per the Conceptual Landscape Plan. ii. Section 10-5-3-D. Parking Area Perimeter Landscape Zone - Landscape required by this section shall be in addition to landscape required under other sections of this title. It is the objective of this section to provide screening between off-street parking areas and rights-of-way, and to provide for the integration of stormwater management with required landscaping. 1. Petitioner has indicated parking area buffer (perimeter) landscape zone plantings on Conceptual Landscape Plans. iii. Section 10-5-3-E. Parking Area Interior Landscape Zone - All off-street parking areas shall include landscape and trees located within the off-street parking area as required by this section. Trees and landscape required by this section shall be in addition to trees and landscape required under other sections of this title. It is the objective of this section to provide shade within parking areas, break up large expanses of parking area pavement, support stormwater management where appropriate, improve the appearance of parking lots as viewed from rights-of-way, and provide a safe pedestrian environment. 11 1. Petitioner is seeking relief from this standard. Staff supports this request. iv. Section 10-5-3-F. Transition Zone Landscape Requirements - Transition zone landscape shall be required along interior side and rear property lines of all nonresidential, mixed use, and multi-family development. It is not expected that the transition area will totally screen such uses but rather will minimize land use conflicts and enhance aesthetics. 1. Petitioner has indicated a 50’wide buffer planting area with shade, ornamental, and evergreen tree mix. The petitioner also proposes enhanced entry landscaping to the two (2) primary access points located at Corneils Road and Eldamain Road. 2. Staff recommends a 100’ Transition Type D Zone Landscape Buffer on the Conceptual Landscape Plan. 3. Staff recommends the installation of an 8-foot-tall berm along all perimeters of the data center campus as part of the 100’ landscape buffer due to the site’s adjacency to four (4) public roadways. 22. MECHANICAL SCREENING – Per Section 10-5-4 Screening of the Unified Development Ordinance, ground/wall-mounted and roof mounted mechanical units that are visible from any public right-of-way or adjacent residential property shall be screened from public view. Petitioner is seeking to establish standards for screening both types of mechanical units (Deviation #9). v. Petitioner proposes to utilize primarily ground mounted mechanical equipment with the equipment yard but will also utilize rooftop mounted equipment. w. As proposed, ground mounted mechanical equipment will be screened with vinyl fencing equal to the height of the generator units but excluding any stacks protruding above the unit. No additional screening is proposed for rooftop mechanical units. i. It is staff’s preference that mechanical equipment, particularly backup generators and condensers, are not located on the rooftop. Rather placed on the side of the building(s) or the opposite side of the facility, farthest from residential structures. ii. If approved to be placed on the rooftop, staff recommends they be enclosed in penthouses with sound damping construction and use of the lowest-noise equipment available, such as hospital-grade mufflers on generators, to aid in minimizing noise impacts on surrounding properties. iii. All major mechanical equipment (generators, chillers, HVAC units) shall be fully enclosed or screened by solid barriers. 12 iv. Staff defers to the sound engineering consultant for any additional recommendations with regards to mechanical screening. 23. FENCING – Per Section 10-5-5-B-1 of the Unified Development Ordinance states fences may be built up to the property line but shall not extend beyond the front plane of the primary building facade in residential and business districts. Maximum height for fencing in manufacturing districts is eight (8) feet. x. Petitioner has not provided manufacturers brochure of proposed security fencing. However, they are requesting to have twelve (12) foot tall security fence extend beyond the front plane of the primary building façade (Deviation #10). i. Since the fence placement requirement only applies to residential and business district uses, staff is supportive of the request as this property is within a manufacturing district. ii. Petitioner must provide details on the fence type and material. iii. Staff questions the request for a twelve-foot (12’-0”) tall security fence which exceeds the maximum permitted eight-foot (8’-0”) tall fence when previous data center developers have requested ten foot (10’) tall fences. 1. The petitioner needs to justify this request before staff can provide a recommendation. iv. Will the fences be locked with access (assuming via a Knox Box) to ComEd officials and EMS teams (assuming Bristol Kendall Fire District and Yorkville Police Department)? 24. BATTERY STORAGE – Per Table 10-3-12(B) of the Unified Development Ordinance, “Battery Uses” are permitted within the M-2 General Manufacturing District. “Battery Uses” are defined as a use that enables battery manufacturing, charging, recycling, warehousing, storage, and related uses. This may also include uses that derive energy from renewable sources, such as wind and solar power, to be collected, stored, and then released for later use to an electric grid, power plant or private user. y. The petitioner’s plans do not indicate that battery uses, or storage, is proposed for the development. Please verify if battery uses or storage is planned for the proposed data center campus. z. If so, staff will require the following: i. Battery uses and storage systems shall be located in a separate standalone building a minimum of 50 feet away from any adjacent structure and must be readily accessible by the fire protection district for firefighting efforts. ii. An approved fire safety and evacuation plan shall be prepared and maintained for occupancies that involve activities for the research and development, testing, manufacturing, handling, or storage of lithium-ion batteries or lithium metal batteries, or the repair or servicing of vehicles powered by lithium – ion batteries or lithium metal batteries. (See comment #31 Recommended Operational Conditions) iii. A fire detection and alarm system is required for indoor storage rooms and outdoor storage. The method of fire detection is either an air-aspirating system or a radiant- energy sensing system. Indoor rooms are also required to be sprinklered and separated from the remainder of the occupancy by two-hour barriers. This structure must provide a 2-hour fire-resistance- 13 rated enclosure and must have an automatic sprinkler system and detection system. 25. APPEARANCE STANDARDS – Per Section 10-5-8-C-4 Industrial Uses masonry products or precast concrete shall be incorporated on at least fifty (50) percent of the total building, as broken down as follows: The "front facade" (defined as that facade that faces a street that includes a main entry to the building) shall itself incorporate masonry products or precast concrete on at least fifty (50) percent of the facade. Any other facade that abuts a street shall incorporate masonry products or precast concrete. The use of masonry products or precast concrete is encouraged on the remaining facades. Where precast concrete panels or split face block is utilized, the use of colors, patterns, or other architectural features within these panels/blocks is encouraged. aa. The petitioner has submitted exterior building renderings featuring a minimalist façade with clean lines and a predominantly white or light grey exterior, likely composed of metal panels or precast concrete for durability and thermal efficiency. However, the design incorporates few windows and architectural interest only at the building entrance. i. Staff recommends the petitioner provide architectural building elevation plans indicating proposed building materials and dimensions. bb. While the use of precast concrete panels aligns with the material requirements of the Appearance Standards, the overall design and color palette fall short of meeting those standards and fail to present an aesthetically acceptable appearance on the long blank expanses of the side facades. cc. Further, Section 10-5-8-C-4b.(2) requires industrial buildings with facades greater than one hundred (100) feet in length shall incorporate recesses, projections, windows, or other ornamental/architectural features along at least thirty (30) percent of the length of the facade abutting a public street in an effort to break up the mass of the structure. Petitioner is seeking relief from this requirement (Deviation #11). i. To achieve compliance with the Appearance Standards and enhance the visual quality of the proposed development, staff recommends the petitioner revise the building elevations to incorporate greater architectural articulation, variation in materials, and a more dynamic color palette. Elements such as vertical and horizontal modulation, material transitions, and fenestration should be integrated to break up the monolithic appearance of the side facades and improve overall aesthetics. ii. Staff further recommends buildings visible from Eldamain, E. Beecher and Galena Roads have the highest aesthetic standards that can be economically achieve. It is important that these structures which will be located at the entrance into the City will make a statement. 26. LOTS – The petitioner is seeking waiver from the requirement for lots to have access on a public street due to the unique nature of the secure data center campus (Deviation #12). dd. Per Section 10-7-2 requires all lots to conform with district standards and states all lots shall front or abut on a public street. Since the site has internal private roadways, staff is supportive of the request. 14 27. STREET DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENTS – The petitioner is requesting exemption from the requirements of Section 10-7-3 in the Unified Development Ordinance (Deviation #13). ee. Standards in this section apply only to publicly dedicated roadways. No internal roads are proposed for public dedication. Staff supports this request but refer to previous comments under #17. ff. Staff defers to the City Engineer regarding the realignment of E. Beecher Road. 28. SIGNAGE – The petitioner does not appear to propose any wall/building mounted signage on the exterior elevations but does propose ground-mounted entry way signage on Corneils Road, Eldamain Road, and Galena Road. gg. Per Section 10-6-6 of the Unified Development Ordinance, single tenant buildings shall be permitted a total of two (2) primary wall signs or one (1) primary wall sign per one hundred (100) linear feet of building frontage. One (1) additional wall sign shall be allowed per additional hundred (100) feet of building frontage. Only one (1) primary wall sign shall be displayed on any single building façade. hh. Single-tenant monument signs may have a maximum sign area of 32 square feet and a maximum height of 8 feet is designed utilizing base quality materials. Signs constructed of high-quality materials are permitted a maximum sign area of 48 square feet and a maximum height of 12 feet. ii. Multi-tenant signs are permitted a maximum sign area of 32 square feet and a maximum height of 10 feet is designed utilizing base quality materials. Signs constructed of high-quality materials are permitted a maximum sign area of 64 square feet and a maximum height of 14 feet. i. See comments under #32 Comprehensive Plan and #33 Development Offsets entryway and placemaking elements. 29. SITE ADDRESSING – Will the internal roadways be named for individual addressing, or will the petitioner seek a single site address off of Eldamain Road or Corneils Road with internal building numbering/identification? 30. LIGHTING – A photometric plan shall be provided along with manufacturers cut sheets of the proposed light standards to be installed within the parking lot area, per Section 10-5-7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Maximum illumination at the property line shall not exceed zero (0) foot-candle and no glare shall spill onto adjacent properties or rights of way. jj. How tall do you anticipate the light standards will be for the data center campus? i. Maximum light standard height for manufacturing districts is 35 ft. Staff may recommend a shorter height. 31. RECOMMENDED OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS – The following is a list of operational conditions recommended by staff to be included in the Planned Unit Development for all future data center campus developments, aimed at addressing resident concerns and maintaining quality of life: kk. Noise Study – All applications for data centers shall provide a noise study as part of the building permitting process which will be subject to review by the City’s sound engineering consultant which entails: 15 i. A pre-construction noise study including baseline noise measurements of the current environment and predictive modeling in phased and at full buildout to ensure the facility’s design will meet local noise limits ii. A mitigation plan in their noise study to ensure that operational noise does not exceed the pre-development baseline measured at the property. iii. Annual noise monitoring is recommended to be conducted by the City’s sound engineering consultant for a period of three (3) years after construction is completed to verify ongoing noise compliance. ll. Operational Testing – Operational testing of emergency backup generators shall be limited to the following: i. Only between the hours of 11am-5pm on weekdays and non-holidays. mm. Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) - Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) shall be submitted and approved by the City and Fire Protection District (BKFD) prior to issuance of a building permit and must include: i. Procedures for fire suppression, hazardous material spills, evacuation, and communication in case of an incident. ii. Training sessions/drill and or walkthroughs with fire and police shall be required prior to occupancy permit. iii. Designated contacts for emergency services and a plan to broadcast information if an incident could affect the public. iv. Must work with KenCom emergency managers to be part of text or siren alert systems. nn. Building Code Standards – The following building code standards shall apply: i. Installing advanced early fire detection in server rooms, using fire- resistive construction beyond code minimums on walls facing neighborhoods, or providing additional hazardous material safeguards. ii. Compliance with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 855. 32. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN – The 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update designates the subject property for Project Steel as “Estate/Conservation Residential (ECR)”. The “Estate/Conservation Residential (ECR)” is intended to provide flexibility for residential design which will accommodate low-density detached single-family housing. oo. The current future land use designation reflects a holding category for parcels not likely to develop within the 10-year horizon of the comprehensive plan’s timeline. While the land use map should guide future land use and development and zoning decisions, it is also meant to be adjusted and changed when circumstances warrant a change in planning direction in a given area of the City.” pp. Overall, staff supports the proposed PUD for a data center campus, as the corridor along Eldamain Road has been identified in the Comprehensive Plan for manufacturing development and has also experienced a recent trend of development for M-2 land uses (specifically data centers). However, staff would 16 like to note the following recommendations from the Comprehensive Plan related to the subject property: i. In Figure 8.17: Eldamain Road Corridor Land Use Strategy of the Yorkville 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update (North of the Fox River) the subject area is identified as “Zone B – Distribution (Corneils Road to BNSF Railroad)” meaning this area is recommended for modern industrial park incorporating branding and placemaking elements, as well as a 50’ to 100’ buffer to maintain the zone’s semi-rural visual character. 33. DEVELOPMENT OFFSETS - As part of the City’s efforts to balance the scale and impact of the proposed 540-acre data center development, the petitioner is expected to provide appropriate development offsets that support the broader community. These include contributing to gateway signage that enhances the City’s identity, donating land and funding the development of a regional public park, community investment within the City’s downtown, and dedicating land to the local fire protection district for a future facility to address increased service demands as described below: qq. Entryway/Gateway Signs i. Staff requests the petitioner provides the necessary easements and funds the design, fabrication, and cost for the installation of one (1) Gateway Element/Entryway Monument Signs located at the southeast corner of Galena Road/Eldamain. 1. Staff further believes this will also assist the petitioner in meeting PUD Modification Standard #4 “Placemaking.” The Planned Unit Development has a distinctive identity and brand that is utilized in the signs, streetscape, architecture, public gathering spaces, open spaces, etc. 17 rr. Parks & Recreation i. Staff requests the petitioner purchase and donates specific land identified by the Parks and Recreation Department Director within the vicinity of the data center development to be utilized for a future regional park site. The petitioner will also provide upfront funding for the development of the park facility. 1. Staff further believes this will assist in the petitioner meeting PUD Modification Standard #10 “Provision of a Regional Park.” The Planned Unit Development includes a park of sufficient size and with high quality amenities adequate to draw visitors and provide recreational opportunities for residents throughout the region in addition to serving residents of Yorkville. ss. Utility Infrastructure i. It is expected that a separate development agreement will cover the expansion of water, sewer, and sanitary sewer district services, including service commitments, cost offsets, and the associated design engineering agreements. tt. Utility & Property Taxes i. Staff requests the petitioner provide estimates of utility taxes and property taxes expected to be generated per building, and whether we can publicly disclose those estimates. uu. Community Investment i. Staff recommends a community investment donation from the petitioner to support the development of the Hydraulic District project. This contribution which can be separate to, or in combination with, the Parks and Recreation donation in comment #33. Staff believes this contribution reflects a commitment to fostering long-term community partnerships and ensuring that large-scale developments like the data center generate shared benefits. The Hydraulic District project is a catalyst for revitalization, economic growth, and quality-of-life improvements, and the petitioner’s investment will help accelerate these outcomes for the broader community. vv. Bristol Kendall Fire District i. Staff requests the petitioner purchase and donate (or provide cash in lieu of) a minimum of five (5) acres for a future fire station with potential locations at the following at the discretion of the fire protection district: 1. Site #1 the unplanned ~8-acre parcel located at the NEC of Corneils and Future Beecher Road 2. Site #2 within the ~84-acre area of “future development” on the eastside of the Proposed Beecher Road. 7 Galena R oad Eldamain RoadGalenaRoad 7 BeecherRoadCorneils R o a dEldamainRoadEldamain Road Recapture Benefitted Parcels Nearmap, Map data from OpenStreetMap 6/26/2024, 1:45:10 PM 0 0.3 0.60.15 mi 0 0.45 0.90.23 km 1:23,646 Kendall County GIS Yorkville Police Department Memorandum 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4340 Fax: 630-553-1141 Date: March 24, 2025 To: Krysti Barksdale-Noble (Community Development Director) From: James Jensen (Chief of Police Reference: List Project Name: Project Steel Data Center - Prologis List Applicant Name: List Project Manager: List Project Number: PZC 2025-08 Please see comments listed below pertaining to the project referenced above: Roadway & Property Signage Handicapped Signage Required: _X_ Yes ____ No **Signage must meet MUTCD Standards **Fine amount must be listed on sign Speed Limit Signage Required/Recommended ____ Yes __X__ No School Zone Special Signage ____ Yes __X__ No Special Speed Zone Signage Requested ____ Yes __X__ No Comments: All roadways other than surrounding primary roadways are private and do not require speed limit signage. NO Construction Traffic Signage being requested? __X__ Yes ____ No Comment #1: Proper construction routes should be identified. Secondary roadways such as Corneils should not be used. Signage would be requested. Comment #2: Construction routes should be clearly posted and shared with employees. Alternate routes should be identified due to upcoming Route 47 construction and the closing of the intersection of Route 47 & Galena Road. Comment #3: Yorkville Police Department would request direct contact with construction managers in case a traffic problem has been identified. ***We request that all signage is posted prior to the first occupancy permit being issued for each POD or phase.*** ***All traffic control signage must conform to MUTCH Standards specific to location, size, color, and height levels*** Roadway Yorkville Police Department Memorandum 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4340 Fax: 630-553-1141 Do you have intersection Concerns? __X__ Yes ____ No Comments: We do have intersection concerns with the private driveways coming out onto Galena Roadway. This roadway is well traveled with higher speed limits (55mph). Proper signage is being requested. Entrance/Exits match up with adjacent driveways? ____ Yes __X__ No Total Entrance/Exits for development? 3 – Galena Road Are vehicle entrance/exits safe? __X__ Yes ____ No Are warning signs for cross traffic requested? __X__ Yes ____ No Comments: Direct entrances/exits to Galena Road should be reviewed, clearly marked and properly signed. Emergency Contact for after hours during construction Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Is this a gated or controlled access development? __X__ Yes ____ No If yes, will police & Fire and Access? ____ Yes ____ No Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Security Will security cameras be in use? ____ Yes ____ No Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Will the business/management provide the police department remote access to the camera system (User credentials only)? ____ Yes ____ No Yorkville Police Department Memorandum 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4340 Fax: 630-553-1141 Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. What are the business Hours of Operation? Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Will the property be alarmed? ____ Yes ____ No Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Will you provide Floor Plans/Maps to the police department ____ Yes ____ No Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Emergency Contact information is being requested. Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Miscellaneous Comments Noise Ordinance Concerns __X__ Yes ____ No Comments: Concerns specific to noise on site (i.e. generators) Criminal Investigations Procedures Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Emergency Operations & Continuity of Operations Yorkville Police Department Memorandum 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4340 Fax: 630-553-1141 Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. I hope you find this information helpful, and we look forward to reviewing the revisions. If you should have any questions, comments, or concerns please do not hesitate to contact me. From:Tim Evans To:Krysti Barksdale-Noble Cc:Scott Sleezer Subject:Data Centers - P&R Land Cash Requests Date:Friday, March 14, 2025 7:24:38 AM Hello Krysti, I know we have had some minor discussion about Data Center and P&R Land Cash requests, but just to put something in writing, the following would be P&R staff initial requests: 1. Land Cash, so that the City is able to purchase land and develop parks sites somewhereelse in the City. 2. If possible, new trails: a. Trail along Beecher from Rt34 to Galena b. Trail along Eldamain from Rt 34 to Baseline c. Trail along Baseline from Ashe/Eldamain to Rt47 d. Trail along Corneils from Eldamain to Rt 47 e. Trail along Faxon from Beecher to Alen Dale Ln Thank You, Timothy V. Evans, CPRP Director of Parks and Recreation United City of Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department 630-553-4357 / tevans@yorkville.il.us Like the Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department at: https://www.facebook.com/YorkvilleParksandRec/ Register for classes at: www.yorkvilleparksandrecreation.com City of Yorkville 2.0: Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube N. BRIDGEE. BEECHERGALEN A CORNEILS W. BEECHERELDAMAINProject Steel 557 ac 0 2,000 4,000 Feet Proposed Shared-Use Path Project Steel Development Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 (630) 466-6700 / www.eeiweb.con EXHIBIT XX PROPOSED PATH LOCATIONS DATE: MAY 2025United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 (630) 553-4350 http://www.yorkville.il.us PROJECT STEELCONSULTING ENGINEERS NO.DATE REVISIONS PROJECT NO.: YO2508 PATH: H:/GIS/PUBLIC/YORKVILLE/2024/ YO2451_PROJECT STEEL PATH EXHIBITFILE: . PROPOSED 10' SHARED-USE PATH PROPOSED 10' SHARED-USE PATH From:Bart Olson To: Cc:Jori Behland; Krysti Barksdale-Noble Subject:RE: Written Comment for May 6th 2025 meeting Date:Thursday, March 27, 2025 3:44:47 PM Hello Elizabeth, Thanks for providing these questions so far in advance. I can answer some of them now, and I will forward your questions and my responses to the aldermen in advance of the May meeting: 1) The plan provided shows water/storm basins being utilized throughout the plan to help mediate noise pollution to residences in addition to help create a more aesthetically pleasing environment. Why was there no plan to put a storm basin in front of my home that is located at the corner of Baseline Road and Mighell Rd? -I would like to formally request that this Plan be revised to include a storm basin located in front of my home that is similar to the majority of the homes surrounding this location. a) City response - This is the first draft of a plan submitted by a petitioner with little feedback given so far by the City. I am acknowledging your request and we will communicate it to the developer and the committee members. On a technical basis, I am not sure if the area in front of your home will lend itself to a drainage basin, but I am guessing you would be more comfortable if there was more distance from your home to the buildings (i.e. maybe they can buffer the area with equivalent distances or noise reduction measures without a basin). The City has engaged a sound engineer that will be reviewing this site plan to see if there are ways we can improve it, and we will be recommending the developer to commit to a sound study post construction so we can monitor the noise in the area. 2) what is the developer and or committee doing about noise pollution? this large of a data center could cause significant noise pollution in this area to residents, causing neurological and mental health stressors in addition to medical issues and complications. These kinds of complications have been reported in numerous research studies by residence who live next to these types of data centers. a) City response - I mentioned above about our sound engineer. We have spoken with our government counterparts in Loudoun County Virginia, which is the data center capital of the world. They have spoken a bit about noise complaints being the most frequent issue cited by neighbors, but they tended to downplay the severity of it compared to your assertion of medical issues and complications. If you have any research studies that you'd like us to review, please forward them along. 3) how much data is being processed or projected to be processed through this facility? How much of this data is identified as United States data, local data, and worldly data? a) City response - I don't believe there are public estimates of the amount of data expected for this facility, nor am I familiar with that being a standard metric to study data centers elsewhere in the world. Usually, data centers are compared on an acreage, square footage, or power use basis. I don't believe there's a way to identify where the data originates publicly either (I suppose it would depend on the end-user of the systems within the building). 4)what is the plan and committee doing to help ensure safety of not just this data center, but the residence that live in this area. I’m speaking specifically not to cyber attacks but terrorism that could come in the form of destroying the data center-being that it could be providing significant data resources to individual throughout the world. a) City response - The City is in touch with the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI Field Office in Chicago on these issues. Generally, the property will be heavily monitored by security guards and systems and all access to the development will be heavily restricted through gated access. 5) what is the developers plan to ensure that during the construction of this facility garbage and debris, including significant dust and dirt kick up is kept to a minimum and does not impact the residents who are living in this area? a) City response - The City has robust development rules that address on-site cleanliness and street debris concerns. We also have rules about dust abatement during mass grading which involve on-site watering and other measures. 6) when it comes to cooling this facility why would the developers identify this area as a prime location for a date center that needs to be cooled significantly when during the spring to early fall months, this area is incredibly hot and humid. a) City response - External temperature has little bearing on the internal operation of the buildings. Data centers are interested in this area primarily because it has adequate power supply and infrastructure. 7) how does the developer plan to mediate the cooling issue of this data center so that it doesn’t impact local residence? a) City response - I'm not sure what you mean here - but, the water usage of the buildings will be reviewed by the City to make sure we have adequate capacity, the power usage will be reviewed and endorsed by ComEd before a power allocation is given, and we're looking to manage any noise generated on site through the sound engineer review of the plans. Thanks, Bart Olson City Administrator United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Point Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 630-553-8537 direct 630-308-0582 cell bolson@yorkville.il.us -----Original Message----- From: Jori Behland <jBehland@yorkville.il.us> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 2:08 PM To: Krysti Barksdale-Noble <knoble@yorkville.il.us>; Bart Olson <BOlson@yorkville.il.us> Cc: Monica Cisija <mcisija@yorkville.il.us> Subject: FW: Written Comment for May 6th 2025 meeting Please see the comments/questions below regarding Project Cardinal. Would you like us to forward this to the elected officials? Thank you, Jori Behland City Clerk 651 Prairie Pointe • Yorkville, IL 60560 630-553-8567 (Direct) 630-553-4350 (City Hall) jbehland@yorkville.il.us https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url? a=https%3a%2f%2flink.edgepilot.com%2fs%2f90f88701%2fJ0i56l0OmEK1- rdMPdND0w%3fu%3dhttp%3a%2f%2fwww.yorkville.il.us%2f&c=E,1,yL9DHRPWxs76XqHTZd2w- 13H_lhAaZwo5KEKXh5hRWBBCgsPHLlPlf6yLpUteCmrmD0VEc4IbbinIxwY2Y3X- VDpnX2WVragfVpYGNIUV6sk8Kb0KIjmNw,,&typo=1 -----Original Message----- From: Elizabeth Fotopoulos Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 1:18 PM To: Jori Behland <jBehland@yorkville.il.us> Subject: Written Comment for May 6th 2025 meeting This is for the meeting on May 6th 2025 Elizabeth Fotopoulos “Economic development committee: project cardinal data center” My questions for the committee are 1) The plan provided shows water/storm basins being utilized throughout the plan to help mediate noise pollution to residences in addition to help create a more aesthetically pleasing environment. Why was there no plan to put a storm basin in front of my home that is located at the corner of Baseline Road and Mighell Rd? -I would like to formally request that this Plan be revised to include a storm basin located in front of my home that is similar to the majority of the homes surrounding this location. 2) what is the developer and or committee doing about noise pollution? this large of a data center could cause significant noise pollution in this area to residents, causing neurological and mental health stressors in addition to medical issues and complications. These kinds of complications have been reported in numerous research studies by residence who live next to these types of data centers. 3) how much data is being processed or projected to be processed through this facility? How much of this data is identified as United States data, local data, and worldly data? 4)what is the plan and committee doing to help ensure safety of not just this data center, but the residence that live in this area. I’m speaking specifically not to cyber attacks but terrorism that could come in the form of destroying the data center-being that it could be providing significant data resources to individual throughout the world. 5) what is the developers plan to ensure that during the construction of this facility garbage and debris, including significant dust and dirt kick up is kept to a minimum and does not impact the residents who are living in this area? 6) when it comes to cooling this facility why would the developers identify this area as a prime location for a date center that needs to be cooled significantly when during the spring to early fall months, this area is incredibly hot and humid. 7) how does the developer plan to mediate the cooling issue of this data center so that it doesn’t impact local residence? Thank you, Elizabeth Sent from my iPhone Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memorandum. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Purchasing Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #6 Tracking Number EDC 2025-41 Project Cardinal (Pioneer) – Annexation, Rezone, PUD & Preliminary Plan Economic Development Committee – June 3, 2025 Majority Approval Requests for annexation, rezoning, Planned Unit Development (PUD), and Preliminary PUD Plan for an approx. 1,037-acre data center campus. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department 1 REQUEST SUMMARY: The petitioner, as contract purchaser, along with property owners Sanjay and Sameer Gupta, Dale L. Konicek, LLC, and The Konicek Family Limited Partnership, is seeking approval for the annexation of seven (7) parcels totaling 305 acres. These parcels will be part of a larger 1,037-acre development consisting of 21 parcels in total planned for a state-of-the-art data center campus. The request also includes rezoning the area to the M-2 General Manufacturing District, special use authorization for a Planned Unit Development (PUD), and approval of a preliminary PUD Plan which involves the phased construction of fourteen (14) two-story data center buildings totaling over 17 million square feet, two (2) electrical substations, a utility switchyard, and associated stormwater detention basins. Each phase of development will include one data center building, with full campus buildout anticipated within 10 years. PROPERTY BACKGROUND: The subject property consists of twenty-one (21) parcels of varying sizes, ranging from one-tenth (0.1) of an acre to approximately 300 acres, generally located northwest of Route 47 and Galena Road, south of Baseline Road, and east of Ashe Road. With a total area of approximately 1,037 acres, the property has Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Sara Mendez, Senior Planner David Hansen, Senior Planner Date: April 28, 2025 Subject: PZC 2025-08 Project Cardinal – Annex, Rezone, PUD & Prelim Plan Proposed Data Center Campus & On-Site Substation/Switchyard Development 2 two (2) existing Annexation/Planned Unit Development Agreements within the proposed subject area for the Project Cardinal data center campus. This includes the Bailey Meadows and Westhaven developments as described and illustrated below: Development Location Acreage Entitlements Type of Units # of Units Bailey Meadows W of SW Corner of Baseline Rd. & Rte. 47 150 ac. Ord. 2004-40 Annexation Agreement (Expired 7/13/24) Res. 2006-43 Prelim. Plan Approval (Expired 7/13/07) Single Family 189 Townhomes 153 Westhaven NW Corner of Rt. 47 & Galena Rd. 586 ac. Ord. 2005-78 Annexation Agreement (Expires 9/27/25) Ord. 2006-132 Amend. Annex. & PUD Agreement Res. 2007-54 Prelim. Plan & Plat Approval (Expired 10/23/08) SF Age-Restricted 568 DU Age-Restricted 244 Single Family 484 TOTAL 736 ac. TOTAL 1638 The underlying zoning for both the Bailey Meadows and Westhaven developments includes R-2 Single- Family Traditional Residence District, R-3 Multi-Family Attached Residence District, and B-3 General Business District. Together, these two developments account for approximately 70% of the overall 3 subject area, resulting in a projected “loss” of about 1,638 future dwelling units. Additionally, it is important to note that the Westhaven development still operates under an active Annexation Agreement, which would be effectively repealed or overridden by the approval of any subsequent planned unit development (PUD) agreement. PROPOSED ANNEXATION: The subject property for the proposed data center campus consists of seven (7) unincorporated parcels totaling 305 acres, as highlighted below: PIN ACRES OWNER JURISDICTION 02-05-300-003 136.73 Galena & 47TH LLC, MPLIV10 LLC CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-04-300-032 26.09 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-04-300-024 1.64 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-05-400-021 1.28 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-09-100-031 0.11 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-09-100-030 1.04 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-04-100-015 32.89 SANJAY & SAMEER GUPTA CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-05-200-007 0.34 UNINCORPORATED 02-06-100-022 233.79 THE KONICEK FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNINCORPORATED 02-06-200-002 48.60 DALE L. KONICEK, LLC CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-05-400-022 301.61 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-05-200-006 102.47 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-04-100-016 11.02 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-06-400-008 29.89 UNINCORPORATED 02-06-200-003 7.02 UNINCORPORATED 02-05-100-003 7.60 UNINCORPORATED 02-05-100-005 8.54 DALE L. KONICEK, LLC UNINCORPORATED 02-05-400-009 15.78 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-04-300-018 45.45 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-04-300-017 7.73 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-06-400-001 17.79 UNINCORPORATED TOTAL 1037.41 The petitioner is requesting to rezone all twenty-one (21) parcels within the subject area to the M-2 General Manufacturing District. In accordance with Section 10-3-4 of the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), any territory annexed into the city is automatically classified as R-1 Single-Family Suburban Residential District; therefore, the petitioner seeks to rezone the seven (7) unincorporated parcels proposed for annexation directly to the M-2 District. Additionally, the petitioner is requesting to rezone the existing parcels within the Bailey Meadows and Westhaven developments—currently zoned R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District, R-3 Multi- Family Attached Residence District, and B-3 General Business District—to the M-2 General Manufacturing District as well. PROPOSED REZONING: As previously noted, the petitioner is seeking to rezone the subject property for the proposed data center campus to the M-2 General Manufacturing District. According to Table 10-3-12(B) of the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), both “data center” and “electric substation” are permitted uses within the M-2 District, with data centers classified as Energy Industrial Uses. Although the UDO does not specifically identify “utility switchyard” as a listed use, Section 10-3- 12(A)(5) allows the Zoning Administrator to determine if an unlisted use is substantially similar to a listed use and treat it accordingly. Since a utility switchyard is generally defined as a type of substation that operates at a single voltage level without transformers, staff considers it substantially similar to an electric substation, and therefore a permitted use in the M-2 District. 4 Additionally, one parcel located south of Galena Road (Parcel No. 02-06-400-001), totaling 17.75 acres, is proposed to house six (6) future water tanks. The petitioner has indicated these tanks may be used for public water storage, which is also a permitted use within the M-2 zoning classification. Petitioner has provided written responses to the Standards for Rezoning which will be entered into the record during the public hearing process. The following are the current immediate surrounding zoning and land uses of the subject property: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD): Data centers are critical facilities that house computing systems and related hardware such as servers, data storage devices, and network infrastructure. They serve as the backbone for IT operations and provide the physical space necessary for storing and managing a company’s digital data. To ensure operational continuity, data center developments typically include backup power generators capable of maintaining service during electrical outages. In the City of Yorkville, Section 10-8-8 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) outlines the standards for Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), which allow for flexibility in zoning regulations provided that any proposed modifications are clearly identified, demonstrate compatibility with the surrounding area, are necessary for the effective development of the site, and meet at least one of the modification standards listed in Section 10-8-8(D). The proposed data center campus aligns with the following two (2) modification standards: Modification Standard #12, “Regional Utility Improvements,” as it includes the extension of public water and sanitary services through the site, enabling future connections by surrounding properties and creating opportunities for recapture payments to the developer. Modification Standard #11, “Funding or Construction of Public Roadways,” by incorporating roadway improvements adjacent to the site that are consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the Kendall County Long-Range Transportation Plan, or other locally adopted transportation plans. The petitioner has provided written responses addressing the special use and PUD standards, which will be entered into the record during the public hearing process. A detailed Planned Unit Development Agreement will also be prepared by the City Attorney to outline all conditions and provisions associated with the development of the data center campus. Zoning Land Use North F- Farming District (Kane County) Baseline Road (Rte. 30) Farmland Transportation Land Use East Planned Unit Development (R-2, R-3, R-4, B-3) B-3 General Business District R-3 Multi-Family Attached Residence District N. Bridge Street (Rte. 47) Farmland (Schramm) Farmland (Northgate Commercial) Bristol Bay Subdivision Transportation Land Use South A-1 Agricultural District (Kendall County) M-1 Manufacturing (Kendall County) R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District A-1 Agricultural District (Special Use) Galena Road Farmland Vacant Farmland Residential/Outbuilding Land Use Farmland (Yorkville Renewables Solar) Transportation Land Use West A-1 Agricultural District (Kendall County) RPD-1 (Kendall County) Ashe Road Farmland Residential/Equestrian Land Use Transportation Land Use 5 PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN: The Project Cardinal site plan outlines a large-scale data center campus spanning approximately 1,037 acres and consisting of fourteen (14) two-story data center buildings, two (2) customer substations, one (1) utility switchyard, and multiple stormwater management basins strategically placed throughout the site. The layout includes designated utility corridors and drainage channels to manage site infrastructure and stormwater flow. A security fence surrounds the campus, with 25-foot setbacks along the perimeter. A separate area in the southwest corner is reserved for six (6) future public water storage tanks. Vehicular access and internal circulation are supported by drive aisles and parking areas, while landscaped buffers and transformer zones are integrated for screening and utility management. Residential protection zones and proximity to adjacent neighborhoods are also indicated on the proposed preliminary PUD site plan. Four (4) data center buildings (#1–4) are clustered in the northwest portion of the property, just east of Eldamain Road. Eight (8) buildings (#5–12) are positioned east of the utility switchyard and substation, forming two linear rows running parallel through the central portion of the site. The final two (2) buildings (#13–14) are located along the southeastern portion of the property. Parking is located adjacent to each building, and the layout includes drainage channels and utility corridors to support infrastructure needs. Finally, the proposed primary access points to the data center will occur through the one (1) access point on Ashe Road and two (2) off of N. Bridge Street (Rte. 47). These points of access will be fenced and guarded stations requiring extensive security verification before entry. The preliminary plan is considered an initial draft that outlines the petitioner's intended layout for a future final plat of subdivision, including all proposed site improvements. Typically, preliminary plans are valid for twelve (12) months. However, for Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), which are considered special 6 uses, the approved plans expire only after three (3) years from approval, if no Building Permit is issued and no portion of the property is final platted. PHASING OF DEVELOPMENT: The petitioner proposes to develop the subject property in fourteen (14) phases over an estimated ten (10) year period, with each phase anticipated to include one (1) building. According to the Project Cardinal narrative, each building is expected to become operational within 24 months of its groundbreaking. REQUESTED PUD DEVIATIONS: The petitioner has listed thirteen (13) proposed deviations from the base M-2 General Manufacturing District standards as part of the PUD and Preliminary Plan. Upon staff review and analysis of the submitted plans, the following is a summary of staff’s recommendations: 1. Building Setbacks - Per the Table 10-3-9(A) Bulk and Dimensional Standards, the following compares current M-2 General Manufacturing District standards with the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) requested modifications (Deviation #1): BUILDING SETBACKS REQUIRED MINIMUM SETBACKS M-2 DISTRICT PROPOSED MINIMUM SETBACKS SITE PLAN* FRONT YARD (Bridge Street/IL Rte. 47) 25’ 25’ SIDE YARD (North – Baseline Road/South- Galena Road) Min. 10% of lot/Max. 20’ 20’ REAR YARD (Ashe Road) 0’ 0’ The petitioner is seeking to have the setbacks apply only to the boundary/perimeter of the subject property rather than each individual building on the site. For the purposes of the perimeter setbacks, the petitioner is requesting Bridge Street/IL Rte. 47 is the established front yard and Ashe Road is the established rear yard. The petitioner seeking a zero (0) foot building setback for all yards on future plats for buildings within the data center campus, as Section 10-8-6-C-6.c(6) of the Unified Development Ordinance requires building setback lines on all lots. Staff is supportive of this request but recommends a minimum 500-foot building separation from the nearest data center building or structure (primary or accessory) to the nearest residential or commercial structure. 2. Permitted Uses - Per Table 10-3-12 (B) of the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), “data center” and “electric substation” are permitted land uses in the M-2 General Manufacturing District. Data centers are defined as Energy Industrial Uses per Table 10-3-12(B) in the Unified Development Ordinance. Use standards for Energy Industrial Uses are reserved for future regulations, if ever approved, under Section 10-4-10 in the Unified Development Ordinance (Deviation #2). The petitioner is seeking waiver of future standards adopted being applicable to this subject property after adoption of the Planned Unit Development but has indicated the data center campus will not utilize battery storage related uses which are currently permitted in the M- 2 District. Staff recommends granting a lock on future regulations under this section of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for a period of ten (10) years, provided the applicant agrees to all staff-recommended development standards outlined in this 7 memorandum, which incorporate the proposed best practices, design guidelines, and operational requirements intended to ensure the least impactful and high-quality development across the data center campus. 3. Maximum Building Height - The M-2 District does not have a maximum building height per Table 10-3-9(A) in the Unified Development Ordinance. However, the petitioner has provided overall building heights for each proposed two-story data center building to top of building roof and top of rooftop equipment. As proposed buildings will not exceed 55’ to top of structure and 78’ to top of rooftop equipment. Staff recommends a maximum overall height for data center buildings within 1,500 feet of a residential structure shall be 70 feet. Additionally, no rooftop mechanical equipment will be allowed within this buffer, unless specifically approved by City Council. 4. Parking Requirements - According to the Preliminary PUD Plan submitted, here are 3,750 total parking spaces to be provided on the property to accommodate the proposed fourteen (14) building data center campus and electric substation/utility switchyard uses. However, total required parking for the subject property is 5,194 spaces, including 114 ADA accessible spaces. Additionally, per Section 10-5-1K-1 of the Unified Development Ordinance, the petitioner is required to install the infrastructure for a minimum of 104 electric vehicle charging stations (Deviation #3). The petitioner is requesting a variance from the UDO required 0.3 spaces per 1,000 to 0.2 spaces per 1,000. Staff is supportive of the requested deviation and recommends a fee in lieu of the required electric vehicle charging station infrastructure for each station provided below the threshold of 104. These collected fees would be used to fund the installation of electric charging stations in the downtown area or at other public facilities. 5. Vehicular Cross Access - Per Section 10-5-1-F of the Unified Development Ordinance, cross access between adjoining developments which minimizes access points along streets, encourages shared parking, and allows for vehicular access between land uses is required (Deviation #5). Due to the impracticality and security concerns of requiring the data center providing vehicular access to adjacent properties, the petitioner is seeking relief from providing cross access. Staff is supportive of this request, but further recommends a traffic management plan be required during construction, including a communication strategy and an on-site point of contact during construction. 6. Pedestrian Circulation - Per Section 10-5-1-N Pedestrian Circulation Standards of the Unified Development Ordinance required off-street parking areas to on-site pedestrian circulation systems and connection to existing and future planned trails (Deviation #6). The petitioner states that walkways between parking areas and building entrances will be provided on-site, however they seek a waiver for public access and connection to public sidewalks and bicycle trails due to the nature and security of the proposed land use. Staff is supportive of this request. In consideration of the requested waiver, staff recommends the petitioner constructs and provides easements for a ten-foot (10’) multi-use walking trail on the outer perimeter of the proposed data center at the following locations: 1. Ashe Road/Galena north to Baseline Road 2. Baseline Road from Ashe/Eldamain Road east to Bridge Street (Rte. 47) 8 7. Off-Street Loading - Per Section 10-5-1-Q of the Unified Development Ordinance, the number of off-street shall be determined on a case-by-case basis, and in the instance of special uses, loading berths adequate number and size to serve such use, as determined by the Zoning Administrators, shall be provided (Deviation #7). The petitioner requests a minimum of one (1) off-street loading space per data center campus building on the subject property. Staff is supportive of this request. 8. Landscaping - Section 10-5-3 establishes landscape standards for new developments. The following landscape requirements would apply to this development: building foundation landscaping, parking area perimeter landscaping, parking area interior landscaping, and transition zone landscaping (Deviation #8). The petitioner has submitted the following landscape plan and is seeking relief from the minimum Parking Area Interior Landscape Zone requirements. Staff is supportive of this requested deviation as the petitioner has indicated a 100’ Transition Type D Zone Landscape Buffer surrounding the data center campus (see example on following page). However, staff recommends the installation of an 8-foot-tall berm along all perimeters of the data center campus as part of the 100’ landscape buffer due to the site’s adjacency to four (4) public roadways: 9 9. Mechanical Screening – Per Section 10-5-4 Screening of the Unified Development Ordinance, ground/wall-mounted and roof mounted mechanical units that are visible from any public right- of-way or adjacent residential property shall be screened from public view. Petitioner is seeking to establish standards for screening both types of mechanical units (Deviation #9). Petitioner proposes to screen ground mounted mechanical equipment with vinyl fencing matching the height of the generator units but excluding any stacks protruding above the unit. No additional screening is proposed for rooftop mechanical units located within penthouses. Staff recommends that major mechanical equipment, including backup generators, chillers, and HVAC units, not be placed on rooftops but instead located on the sides of buildings or areas farthest from nearby residential structures. If rooftop placement is approved, the equipment should be enclosed in penthouses with sound-dampening construction and utilize the quietest available technology, such as hospital-grade mufflers. Regardless of location, all major mechanical equipment must be fully enclosed or screened by solid barriers to minimize visual and noise impacts. Staff has engaged a sound engineer to evaluate the preliminary PUD plan, taking into consideration the surrounding existing and future land uses, and prepare a report regarding recommendations for noise mitigation and location of outdoor mechanical equipment. The sound engineer will also review the petitioner’s building permit applications for noise control design and analysis. This report will be included as a condition of the special use for the PUD. 10. Lots – Per Section 10-7-2 requires all lots to conform with district standards and states all lots shall front or abut on a public street. Since the site has internal private roadways (Deviation #10). The petitioner is seeking waiver from the requirement for lots to have access on a public street due to the unique nature of the secure data center campus. Staff is supportive of this request. 11. Appearance Standards - Per Section 10-5-8-C-4 Industrial Uses, masonry products or precast concrete shall be incorporated on at least fifty (50) percent of the total building. Any other facade that abuts a street shall incorporate masonry products or precast concrete. The use of masonry products or precast concrete is encouraged on the remaining facades. Where precast concrete panels or split face block is utilized, the use of colors, patterns, or other architectural features within these panels/blocks is encouraged. 10 The petitioner has submitted exterior building elevations featuring predominantly blank, monolithic wall structures composed of materials such as light grey precast concrete panels, medium grey insulated metal panels, glazing, and vinyl screen walls with metal downspout accents (Deviation #11). While the use of precast concrete panels aligns with the material requirements of the Appearance Standards, the overall design and color palette fall short of meeting those standards and fail to present an aesthetically acceptable appearance. To achieve compliance with the Appearance Standards and enhance the visual quality of the proposed development, staff recommends the petitioner revise the building elevations to incorporate greater architectural articulation, variation in materials, and a more dynamic color palette. Elements such as vertical and horizontal modulation, material transitions, and fenestration should be integrated to break up the monolithic appearance of the facades and improve overall aesthetics. Staff further recommends buildings visible from Route 47 have the highest aesthetic standards that can be economically achieve. It is important that these structures, which will be located at the entrance into the City, make a statement. 12. Street Design and Improvements – The petitioner is requesting exemption from the requirements of Section 10-7-3 in the Unified Development Ordinance (Deviation #12). Standards in this section apply only to publicly dedicated roadways. No internal roads are proposed for public dedication. Staff supports this request but defers to the City Engineer regarding the extension of E. Beecher Road northward toward Baseline Road. 11 13. Fencing - Per Section 10-5-5-B-1 of the Unified Development Ordinance states fences may be built up to the property line but shall not extend beyond the front plane of the primary building facade in residential and business districts. Maximum height for fencing in manufacturing districts is eight (8) feet (Deviation #13). Petitioner has provided a manufacturers brochure of proposed high security steel fencing. They are requesting to have ten (10) foot tall powder coated black steel security fence extend beyond the front plane of the primary building façade. Staff is supportive of the request. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The following is a list of operational conditions recommended by staff to be included in the Planned Unit Development for the future data center campus, which is aimed at addressing resident concerns and maintaining quality of life: a. Noise Study – A noise study shall be provided as part of the building permitting process which will be subject to review by the City’s sound engineering consultant which entails: i. A pre-construction noise study including baseline noise measurements of the current environment and predictive modeling in phased and at full buildout to ensure the facility’s design will meet local noise limits ii. A mitigation plan in their noise study to ensure that operational noise does not exceed the City’s current noise ordinance regulations. iii. Annual noise monitoring is recommended to be conducted by the City’s sound engineering consultant for a period of three (3) years after construction is completed to verify ongoing noise compliance. b. Operational Testing – Operational testing of emergency backup generators shall be limited to the following: i. Only between the hours of 11am-5pm on weekdays and non-holidays. c. Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) - Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) shall be submitted and approved by the City and Fire Protection District (BKFD) prior to issuance of a building permit and must include: i. Procedures for fire suppression, hazardous material spills, evacuation, and communication in case of an incident. ii. Training sessions/drill and or walkthroughs with fire and police shall be required prior to occupancy permit. iii. Designated contacts for emergency services and a plan to broadcast information if an incident could affect the public. iv. Must work with KenCom emergency managers to be part of text or siren alert systems. d. Building Code Standards – The following building code standards shall apply: i. Installing advanced early fire detection in server rooms, using fire-resistive construction beyond code minimums on walls facing neighborhoods, or providing additional hazardous material safeguards. ii. Compliance with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 855. 12 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update designates the subject property for Project Cardinal as “Estate/Conservation Residential (ECR)” and “Parks and Open Space (OS).” The ECR designation is intended to allow for flexible residential development patterns while maintaining low-density, detached single-family housing. The Parks and Open Space designation is meant to preserve recreational areas and open space for either public or private use. These land use designations reflect the existing zoning and development plans for the Bailey Meadows and Westhaven PUDs, and the Comprehensive Plan further envisions the west side of N. Bridge Street (IL Route 47) in this area as a location for parkland or “green infrastructure.” Staff supports the proposed PUD for a data center campus due to the corridor along Eldamain Road—identified in the Comprehensive Plan for manufacturing development and showing a recent trend of M-2 uses such as data centers—while also acknowledging relevant Comprehensive Plan recommendations for the site. In Figure 8.17: Eldamain Road Corridor Land Use Strategy of the Yorkville 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update (North of the Fox River) the subject area is identified as “Zone B – Distribution (Corneils Road to BNSF Railroad)” meaning this area is recommended for modern industrial park incorporating branding and placemaking elements, as well as a 50’ to 100’ buffer to maintain the zone’s semi-rural visual character. The recommended enhanced perimeter landscaping along Eldamain Road for the proposed Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plan will accomplish this comprehensive plan goal. Further, in Figure 8.5: Zone A North Gateway Future Land Use Concept (Baseline Road to Galena Road) and Figure 8.20: Rural Agricultural Zone A Future Land Use Concept (Baseline Road to Corneils Road) each indicate an opportunity to create gateway signage and enhance the roadway with landscaping elements introducing the entryway into the City (as illustrated below). 13 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: As with the Cyrus One data center Planned Unit Development (PUD), a separate development agreement will be required for Project Cardinal. This agreement will outline specific provisions related to development offsets and infrastructure funding. In alignment with the City’s goal to balance the scale and impact of the proposed 1,034-acre data center campus, the petitioner is expected to provide meaningful community offsets. These include contributions could include gateway signage and dedication of land or cash to the City. The agreement will also address infrastructure funding related to projected water and sanitary sewer improvements, including design engineering, payment schedules, and potential recapture provisions. City staff is actively working with the petitioner as they refine their projected utility usage estimates, which will inform a forthcoming water and sewer capacity study to be completed by the City Engineer and YBSD. We anticipate presenting the draft development agreement to the City Council on or before the date of the final vote. COMMUNITY MEETING: Per Section 10-8-13-B-1-a of the Unified Development Ordinance states a community meeting of area/neighborhood property owners, explaining the proposed Annexation, Rezoning and Planned Unit Development (PUD) conducted by the petitioner at their own expense and at a location of their choosing may be required as a recommendation from the Plan Council prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing date. Due to the scale and intensity of the proposed data center campus development, staff has required the Petitioner to meet with the homeowners in the Bristol Bay Subdivision (east), Equestrian Estates at 14 Legacy Farms (west), and various adjacent properties along Baseline Road, Eldamain Road, and Galena Road prior to the upcoming City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) public hearings to present the plan and gather feedback from residents. STAFF COMMENTS: The proposed Planned Unit Development and Preliminary PUD Plan are in general conformance with the standards provided in the Unified Development Ordinance. The petitioner has provided written responses to these standards which will be incorporated into the record during the public hearing. Staff is confident the petitioner will provide updated plans responsive to the recommendations enumerated in this memo in order to proceed to the next scheduled meeting. All PUD approvals will also be subject to review comments provided by the City Engineer, EEI Inc., in a letter dated April 4, 2025 and any subsequent reviews. Therefore, the public hearing for the requested annexation is tentatively scheduled to be held at the June 10, 2025 City Council meeting and the public hearing for the requested rezoning, special use for the Planned Unit Development, and Preliminary PUD Plan is tentatively planned for the June 11, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. A tentative final vote by the City Council is expected at the July 8, 2025 meeting. Should you have any questions regarding this matter; staff will be available at Tuesday night’s meeting. Attachments: 1. Copy of Petitioner’s Application Package dated March 14, 2025 2. Updated Applications dated March 21, 2025 3. Preliminary PUD Site Plan dated 03/14/2025 submitted by Pioneer Development and prepared by Burns McDonnell, Margulies Hoelzli Architecture, and O2 4. Exterior Elevations dated 03/14/2025 submitted by Pioneer Development and prepared by Burns McDonnell, Margulies Hoelzli Architecture, and O2 5. Landscape Plan dated 03/11/2025 submitted by Pioneer Development and prepared by Burns McDonnell, Margulies Hoelzli Architecture, and O2 6. Traffic Methodology Memo dated March 14, 2025 and submitted by Pioneer Development and prepared by Burns McDonnell 7. Preliminary Drainage Memo dated March 14, 2025 and submitted by Pioneer Development and prepared by Burns McDonnell 8. Security Fencing Details dated March 14, 2025 and submitted by Pioneer Development and prepared by Burns McDonnell 9. EEI Review Letter to the City dated April 4, 2025 10. Project Cardinal Floodplain Exhibit dated March 2025 and prepared by EEI, Inc. 11. Soundscape Engineering Review Memos dated April 7, 2025 and April 21, 2025 12. Plan Council Packet Materials 04-10-2025 13. Email from Elizabeth Fotopoulos dated March 25, 2025 ANNEXATION, REZONING & PUD APPLICATIONS UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE MARCH 14, 2025 Table of Contents Section 1. Project Cardinal Introduction Section 2. Application for Annexation Section 3. Application for Rezoning Section 4. Application for Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) Section 5. Petition for Special Use and PUD Approval Section 6. Conceptual Site Plan Section 7. Building Elevations Section 8. Landscape Plan Section 9. Traffic Impact Analysis Section 10. Stormwater Calculations Section 11. Security Fencing Section 12. Annexation Map Section 13. Legal Description Section 14. Consents of Owners Section 15. Contiguous Owners Section 16. Public Hearing Sign Application Section 17. Fee Schedule Section 18. Acknowledgement of Financial Responsibility Section 1 Project Cardinal Introduction Project Cardinal (“Project”) is an intended state-of-the-art data center campus in the City of Yorkville (“City”) on approximately 1,037 acres of vacant land northwest of Route 47 and Galena Road. The Project is proposed by Pioneer Development, LLC (“Petitioner”), a hyperscale data center developer specializing in advanced digital infrastructure solutions. The phased Project will include up to fourteen data center buildings as shown on the Concept Site Plan included in Section 6 of this application package. Each phase of the Project is expected to include one building, and each building phase is expected to become operational within twenty-four months of groundbreaking. Subject to market conditions, the first building is slated for operation in 2029, and additional buildings will come online on a ramp schedule as power availability increases. Given Chicagoland’s increasing need for high-performance computing, Project completion is anticipated within the next decade. Each building in the Project will feature architectural treatments that incorporate elements reminiscent of modern warehouse design, balancing practical necessity with aesthetics to the full extent possible. Facades will include precast concrete walls with metal elements, considering the most current technology and specific tenant requirements. The Petitioner will install core utilities and site infrastructure, including a utility switchyard, two electrical substations, seven stormwater management basins, three main access roads with security checkpoints, on-site parking, and perimeter fencing. The Project is innovatively designed to operate with minimal impact on public resources, generate significant tax and other revenue streams at local and state levels and enhance the region’s digital and other infrastructure, while meeting the growing hyperscale technology demands of its prospective tenants. Section 2 Application for Annexation APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fa x: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us DATE: PZC NUMBER: DEVELOPMENT NAME: PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME: COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: BUSINESS HOME EMAIL: FAX: PROPERTY INFORMATION NAME OF HOLDER OF LEGAL TITLE: IS THE PROPERTY OCCUPIED OR VACANT: IF OCCUPIED, PLEASE LIST ALL NAMES OF ELECTORS (THOSE REGISTERED TO VOTE) RESIDING ON THE PROPERTY: IF LEGAL TITLE IS HELD BY A LAND TRUST, LIST THE NAMES OF ALL HOLDERS OF ANY BENEFICIAL INTEREST THEREIN: PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY’S PHYSICAL LOCATION: CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION: ZONING AND LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES NORTH: EAST: SOUTH: WEST: KENDALL COUNTY PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER(S) March 21, 2025 Project Cardinal Matt McCarron Pioneer Development, LLC 30 N. Gould Street, #38989, Sheridan, WY 82801 The Konicek Family LP, Sanjay & Sameer Gupta, Galena & 47th LLC & MPLIV10 LLC, & Dale L. Konicek LLC Vacant Approximately 1037 acres of vacant land under contract by applicant within the boundaries of Ashe Rd to the West, Baseline Rd to the North, IL-47 to the East, and Galena Rd to the South (excluding farmsteads at 10094 and 10034 Baseline Rd). City of Yorkville: PUD (R-2, R-3, and B-3); Kendall County: A-1 Agricultural Kane County: F-1 Rural Residential District Yorkville: B-3 General Bus., R-3 Multi-Family Attached Res., R-4 General Multi-Family Res., and PUD (R-2, R-3, and B-3) Kendall County: A-1 Agricultural and M-1 Limited Manufacturing Kendall County: A-1 Agricultural and RPD-1 Ord. 06-03 w/Special Use Ord. 19-21 02-06-100-022 02-06-400-008 02-06-200-003 02-05-100-003 02-05-100-005 02-05-200-007 02-06-400-001 Sheridan, WY 82801 matt@cirrusfarms.com APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fa x: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us PLEASE DESCRIBE IN DETAIL ANY ADDITIONAL REQUESTS TO BE MADE UPON ANNEXATION APPROVAL. ATTORNEY INFORMATION NAME: COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL: FAX: ENGINEER INFORMATION NAME: COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL: FAX: LAND PLANNER/SURVEYOR INFORMATION NAME: COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL: FAX: ATTACHMENTS Petitioner must attach a legal description of the property to this application and title it as “Exhibit A”. Petitioner must attach a Plat of Survey or Proposed Plat of Annexation of the property and title it as “Exhibit B”. Petitioner must provide a written petition signed by a majority of the owners of record of land within the territory to be annexed and also by a majority of the electors, if any, residing within the territory to be annexed. Attach as a separate petition titled as “Exhibit C”. In addition to the annexation of the unincorporated parcels to the United City of Yorkville as requested by this application, there will be corresponding applications for rezoning to M-2 General Manufacturing District and for a Special Use for Planned Unit Development for all the parcels to be acquired by applicant within the boundaries of Ashe Rd to the West, Baseline Rd to the North, 47 to the East, and Galena Rd to the South. David J. Silverman & Ann M. Zaremba Mahoney, Silverman & Cross, LLC 822 Infantry Drive, Suite 100 (815) 730-9500 azaremba@msclawfirm.com Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. 2175 N. California Blvd, Suite 400 (650) 631-6496 Dean L. Bauer, PLS (Director of Surveying)Quigg Engineering Inc 245 W. Roosevelt Road, Suite 87 (630) 228-1231 ext. 2501 Joliet, IL 60435 dsilverman@msclawfirm.com Toby Barrons Walnut Creek, CA 94596 tbarrons@burnsmcd.com West Chicago, IL 60185 dbauer@quiggengineering.com APPLICATION FOR ANNEXATION United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fa x: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us AGREEMENT I VERIFY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IN THIS APPLICATION IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I UNDERSTAND AND ACCEPT ALL REQUIREMENTS AND FEES AS OUTLINED AS WELL AS ANY INCURRED ADMINISTRATIVE AND PLANNING CONSULTANT FEES WHICH MUST BE CURRENT BEFORE THIS PROJECT CAN PROCEED TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED COMMITTEE MEETING. I UNDERSTAND ALL OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND UNDERSTAND THAT IF AN APPLICATION BECOMES DORMANT IT IS THROUGH MY OWN FAULT AND I MUST THEREFORE FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED ABOVE. PETITIONER SIGNATURE DATE OWNER SIGNATURE DATE OWNER HEREBY AUTHORIZES THE PETITIONER TO PURSUE THE APPROPRIATE ENTITLEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED PLEASE NOTARIZE HERE: {See Consent of Owners - Section 14} Section 3 Application for Rezoning APPLICATION FOR REZONING United City of Yorkville 1SBJSJF1PJOUF%SJWF Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us DATE: PZC NUMBER: DEVELOPMENT NAME: PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME: COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: BUSINESS HOME EMAIL: FAX: PROPERTY INFORMATION NAME OF HOLDER OF LEGAL TITLE: IF LEGAL TITLE IS HELD BY A LAND TRUST, LIST THE NAMES OF ALL HOLDERS OF ANY BENEFICIAL INTEREST THEREIN: PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY’S PHYSICAL LOCATION: CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION: REQUESTED ZONING CLASSIFICATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: TOTAL ACREAGE: ZONING AND LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES NORTH: EAST: SOUTH: WEST: KENDALL COUNTY PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER(S) March 20, 2025 Project Cardinal Matt McCarron Pioneer Development, LLC 30 N. Gould Street, #38989 Sheridan, WY 82801 (847) 738-5005 matt@cirrusfarms.com The Konicek Family LP,Sanjay&Sameer Gupta, Galena & 47th LLC, MPLIV10 LLC & Dale L. Konicek LLC Approximately 1037 acres of vacant land under contract by applicant within the boundaries of Ashe Rd to the West, Baseline Rd to the North, Route 47 to the East and Galena Rd to the South. PUD (R-2, R-3 & B-3) Kendall: A-1 M-2 1037 Kane County: F-1 Rural Residential Yorkville: B-3 General Business, R-3 Multi-Family Attached Res., R-4 Multi-Family Res., and PUD (R-2, R-3 & B-3) Kendall County: A-1 Agricultural & M-1 Limited Manufacturing Kendall County: A-1 Agricultural & RPD-1 Residential Planned Development Ord. 06-03 w/Special Use Ord. 19-21 02-06-100-022 02-06-200-002 02-06-400-008 02-06-200-003 02-05-400-022 02-05-100-003 02-05-100-005 02-05-200-006 02-04-100-016 02-04-300-018 02-05-400-009 02-04-300-017 02-05-300-003 02-04-300-032 02-05-400-021 02-09-100-030 02-09-100-031 02-04-300-024 02-04-100-015 02-05-200-007 02-06-400-001 ● APPLICATION FOR REZONING United City of Yorkville 1SBJSJF1PJOUF%SJWF Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us ATTORNEY INFORMATION NAME: COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL: FAX: ENGINEER INFORMATION NAME: COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL: FAX: LAND PLANNER/SURVEYOR INFORMATION NAME: COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL: FAX: ATTACHMENTS Petitioner must attach a legal description of the property to this application and title it as “Exhibit A”. Petitioner must list the names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners within five hundred (500) feet of the property that are entitled notice of application under any applicable City Ordinance or State Statute. Attach a separate list to this application and title it as “Exhibit B”. David J. Silverman & Ann M. Zaremba Mahoney, Silverman & Cross, LLC 822 Infantry Drive, Suite 100 Joliet, IL 60435 (815) 730-9500 dsilverman@msclawfirm.com&azaremba@msclawfirm.co Toby Barrons Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company Inc. 2715 N. California Blvd, Suite 400 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (650) 631-6496 tbarrons@burnsmcd.com Dean L. Bauer, PLS (Director of Surveying) Quigg Engineering Inc 245 W. Roosevelt Road, Suite 87 West Chicago, IL 60185 (630) 228-1231 ext. 2501 dbauer@quiggengineering APPLICATION FOR REZONING United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 We bsite: www.yorkville.il.us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hT.(FOFSBM.BOVGBDUVSJOH %JTUSJDU APPLICATION FOR REZONING United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 We bsite: www.yorkville.il.us REZONING STANDARDS PLEASE STATE THE COMMUNITY NEED FOR THE PROPOSED LAND USE: PLEASE STATE THE LENGTH OF TIME THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN VACANT AS ZONED CONSIDERED IN THE CONTEXT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA IN THE VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: PLEASE STATE HOWTHE PROPOSED PARCEL(S)TO BE REZONED SHALL MEETTHE MINIMUM FRONTAGE AND AREA REQUIREMENTS OFTHE REQUESTED ZONING DISTRICT ASSPECIFIED IN SECTION10-3-9(A) INTHE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE 6/-&4405)&38*4&(3"/5&%3&-&*'"441&$*'*&%*/4&$5*0/7"3*"5*0/4: 1FUJUJPOFSQSPQPTFTBEBUBDFOUFSBDDPSEJOHUPUIFBUUBDIFE$PODFQUVBM4JUF1MBO 4FDUJPO #VJMEJOH&MFWBUJPOT 4FDUJPO BOE -BOETDBQF1MBO 4FDUJPO JO BDDPSEBODFXJUIUIFSFRVJSFNFOUTPG " PGUIF6OJGJFE %FWFMPQNFOU0SEJOBODF BOEXJUI EFWJBUJPOTBTSFRVFTUFECZ1FUJUJPOFSJOUIFDPSSFTQPOEJOHBQQMJDBUJPOGPSB4QFDJBM 6TFGPS1MBOOFE6OJU%FWFMPQNFOU 4FDUJPOBOE 4FDUJPO 5IFQSPQPTFEVTFBTBEBUBDFOUFSQFSNJUUFEJOUIF.(FOFSBM.BOVGBDUVSJOH%JTUSJDUXJMMNFFUUIFJODSFBTJOHEFNBOEGPSEBUBDFOUFS TFSWJDFTJOUIFCSPBEFS$IJDBHPMBOEDPNNVOJUZ XIJMFBMTPQSPWJEJOHJOGSBTUSVDUVSFFOIBODFNFOUT JOTUBMMBUJPOTPGQVCMJDVUJMJUJFT FNQMPZNFOUPQQPSUVOJUJFT BOEJODSFBTFEUBYBOEPUIFSSFWFOVFTBTTPDJBUFEXJUIUIFEFWFMPQNFOU "QPSUJPOPGUIF4VCKFDU1SPQFSUZXBTPSJHJOBMMZBOOFYFEUPUIF$JUZJOQVSTVBOUUP0SE/PBTQBSUPGUIF8FTUIBWFO NJYFEVTFSFTJEFOUJBMBOEDPNNFSDJBMQMBOOFEVOJUEFWFMPQNFOUXIJDIXBTOFWFSDPOTUSVDUFE BOPUIFSQPSUJPOPGUIF4VCKFDU1SPQFSUZ XBTPSJHJOBMMZBOOFYFEUPUIF$JUZJOQVSTVBOUUP0SE/PBTUIF#BJMFZ.FBEPXTSFTJEFOUJBMEFWFMPQNFOUXIJDIXBT OFWFSDPOTUSVDUFE BOEUIFQPSUJPOPGUIF4VCKFDU1SPQFSUZGPSXIJDI1FUJUJPOFSIBTBQQMJFEUPCFBOOFYFEUPUIF$JUZJTDVSSFOUMZ[POFE BTBHSJDVMUVSBM6OEFSUIFDVSSFOUNJYFEVTF16%BOEBHSJDVMUVSBM[POJOH UIF4VCKFDU1SPQFSUZIBTSFNBJOFEVOEFWFMPQFEWBDBOUMBOE 5IFQSPQFSUZXJUIJOUIFHFOFSBMBSFBPGUIF4VCKFDU1SPQFSUZIBTBMTPSFNBJOFEWBDBOUGBSNMBOE XJUIUIFFYDFQUJPOPGB,FOEBMM$PVOUZ 3FTJEFOUJBM16%UPUIF8FTU B$JUZNJYFEVTF16%UPUIF&BTU BOEB,FOEBMM$PVOUZNBOVGBDUVSJOHVTF QSPQPTFEEBUBDFOUFS UPUIF 4PVUI APPLICATION FOR REZONING United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 We bsite: www.yorkville.il.us AGREEMENT I VERIFY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IN THIS APPLICATION IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I UNDERSTAND AND ACCEPT ALL REQUIREMENTS AND FEES AS OUTLINED AS WELL AS ANY INCURRED ADMINISTRATIVE AND PLANNING CONSULTANT FEES WHICH MUST BE CURRENT BEFORE THIS PROJECT CAN PROCEED TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED COMMITTEE MEETING. I UNDERSTAND ALL OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND UNDERSTAND THAT IF AN APPLICATION BECOMES DORMANT IT IS THROUGH MY OWN FAULT AND I MUST THEREFORE FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED ABOVE. PETITIONER SIGNATURE DATE OWNER SIGNATURE DATE OWNER HEREBY AUTHORIZES THE PETITIONER TO PURSUE THE APPROPRIATE ENTITLEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY. THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED PLEASE NOTARIZE HERE: \4FF$POTFOUTPG0XOFST4FDUJPO ^ Section 4 Application for PUD APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 We bsite: www.yorkville.il.us DATE: PZC NUMBER: DEVELOPMENT NAME: PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME: COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: BUSINESS HOME EMAIL: FAX: PROPERTY INFORMATION NAME OF HOLDER OF LEGAL TITLE: IF LEGAL TITLE IS HELD BY A LAND TRUST, LIST THE NAMES OF ALL HOLDERS OF ANY BENEFICIAL INTEREST THEREIN: PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY’S PHYSICAL LOCATION: CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION: REQUESTED ZONING CLASSIFICATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: TOTAL ACREAGE: LIST ALL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES OR AGENCIES REQUIRED TO RECEIVE NOTICE UNDER ILLINOIS LAW: ZONING AND LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES NORTH: EAST: SOUTH: WEST: KENDALL COUNTY PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER(S) March 20, 2025 Project Cardinal Matt McCarron Pioneer Development, LLC 30 N. Gould Street, #38989 The Konicek Family LP, Sanjay & Sameet Gupta, Galena & 47th LLC, MPLIV10, LLC, & Dale L. Konicek LLC Approximately 1037 acres of vacant land under contract by Petitioner within the boundaries of Ashe Rd to the West, Baseline Rd to the North, IL-47 to the East and Galena Rd to the South. PUD (R-2, R-3 & B-3) Kendall: A-1 M-2 PUD (R-2, R-3 & B-3) Approximately 1037 acres Kane County: F-1 Rural Residential Yorkville: B-3 General Business, R-3 Multi-Family Attached Res., R-4 Multi-Familly Res., and PUD (R-2, R-3, & B-3) Kendall County: A-1 Agricultural & M-1 Limited Manufacturing Kendall County: A-1 Agricultural & RPD-1 Residential Planned Devleopment Ord. 06-03 w/ Special Use Ord. 19-21 02-06-100-022 02-06-200-002 02-06-400-008 02-06-200-003 02-05-400-022 02-05-100-003 02-05-100-005 02-05-200-006 02-04-100-016 02-04-300-018 02-05-400-009 02-04-300-017 02-05-300-003 02-04-300-032 02-05-400-021 02-09-100-030 Sheridan, WY 82801 matt@cirrusfarms.com APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 We bsite: www.yorkville.il.us ATTORNEY INFORMATION NAME: COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL: FAX: ENGINEER INFORMATION NAME: COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL: FAX: LAND PLANNER/SURVEYOR INFORMATION NAME: COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: TELEPHONE: EMAIL: FAX: AGREEMENT I VERIFY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IN THIS APPLICATION IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I UNDERSTAND AND ACCEPT ALL REQUIREMENTS AND FEES AS OUTLINED AS WELL AS ANY INCURRED ADMINISTRATIVE AND PLANNING CONSULTANT FEES WHICH MUST BE CURRENT BEFORE THIS PROJECT CAN PROCEED TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED COMMITTEE MEETING. I UNDERSTAND ALL OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND UNDERSTAND THAT IF AN APPLICATION BECOMES DORMANT IT IS THROUGH MY OWN FAULT AND I MUST THEREFORE FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED ABOVE. OWNER HEREBY AUTHORIZES THE PETITIONER TO PURSUE THE APPROPRIATE ENTITLEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY. PETITIONER SIGNATURE OWNER SIGNATURE DATE DATE THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED PLEASE NOTARIZE HERE: David J. Silverman & Ann M. Zaremba Mahoney, Silverman & Cross, LLC 822 Infantry Drive, Suite 100 (815) 730-9500 azaremba@msclawfirm.com Toby Barrons Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company Inc 2715 N. California Blvd, Suite 400 (650) 631-6496 Dean L. Bauer, PLS (Director of Surveying)Quigg Engineering Inc 245 W. Roosevelt Road, Suite 87 (630) 228-1231 ext. 2501 (312) 235-6784 {See Consents of Owners - Section 14} Joliet, IL 60435 dsilverman@msclaw.com Walnut Creek, CA 94596 tbarrons@burnsmcd.com West Chicago, IL 60185 dbauer@quiggengineering.com APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 We bsite: www.yorkville.il.us PROPERTY INFORMATION IS THE PROPERTY WITHIN CITY LIMITS? DOES A FLOODPLAIN EXIST ON THE PROPERTY? ATTACHMENTS Petitioner must attach a legal description of the property to this application and title it as “Exhibit A”. Petitioner must list the names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners within five hundred (500) feet of the property that are entitled notice of application under any applicable City Ordinance or State Statute. Attach a separate list to this application and title it as “Exhibit B”. PUD MODIFICATION STANDARDS PETITIONER MUST INDICATE WHICH TANGIBLE BENEFIT THE PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WILL PROVIDE TO THE CITY, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 10-8-8D OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE. AT LEAST ONE (1) MUST BE MET: LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION AND VISUAL ENHANCEMENT SUSTAINABLE DESIGN PUBLIC GATHERING SPACE PLACEMAKING UNIVERSAL DESIGN HIGH QUALITY BUILDING MATERIALS AGE-TARGETED DEVELOPMENT AFFORDABILITY PROVISION OF A PUBLIC SCHOOL PROVISION OF A REGIONAL PARK FUNDING OR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS REGIONAL UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS As part of the pre-application meeting with community development staff, the petitioner can determine which above PUD modification standard is consistent with the proposed plan. YES NO YES NO 1BSUPGUIF 4VCKFDU1SPQFSUZJTOPUXJUIJO$JUZMNJUT BOEJTUIFTVCKFDUPGUIFDPSSFTQPOEJOH"QQMJDBUJPO GPS"OOFYBUJPOTVCNJUUFECZ1FUJUJPOFS■ APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 We bsite: www.yorkville.il.us PUD STANDARDS PLEASE STATE HOW THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES SET FORTH IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND OTHER ADOPTED PLANS AND POLICY DOCUMENTS OF THE CITY: PLEASE STATE HOW THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IS LAID OUT AND DEVELOPED AS A UNIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN INTEGRATED OVERALL DESIGN, IN WHICH THE VARIOUS LAND USES FUNCTION AS A COHESIVE WHOLE AND SUPPORT ONE ANOTHER. THE DESIGN SHALL PROVIDE IDENTIFIABLE CENTERS, WHICH FORM FOCUS AREAS OF ACTIVITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT, AND EDGES, WHICH DEFINE THE OUTER BORDERS OF THE DEVELOPMENT, THROUGH THE HARMONIOUS GROUPING OF BUILDINGS, USES, FACILITIES, PUBLIC GATHERING SPACES, AND OPEN SPACE: PLEASE STATE HOW THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IS DESIGNED, LOCATED, AND PROPOSED TO BE OPERATED AND MAINTAINED SO THAT IT WILL NOT IMPAIR AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF LIGHT AND AIR TO ADJACENT PROPERTY AND WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE THE DANGER OF FIRE OR OTHERWISE ENDANGER THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE: Please see attached petition. Please see attached petition. Please see attached petition. APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 We bsite: www.yorkville.il.us PUD STANDARDS PLEASE STATE HOW THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES USES WHICH ARE GENERALLY COMPATIBLE AND CONSISTENT WITH THE USES OF ADJACENT PARCELS. IF THE USES ARE NOT GENERALLY COMPATIBLE, ALL ADVERSE IMPACTS HAVE BEEN MITIGATED THROUGH SCREENING, LANDSCAPING, PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, AND OTHER BUFFERING FEATURES THAT PROTECT USES WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES: PLEASE STATE HOW THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IS DESIGNED SO THAT ADEQUATE UTILITIES, ROAD ACCESS, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, AND OTHER NECESSARY FACILITIES WILL BE PROVIDED TO SERVE IT. THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHALL INCLUDE SUCH IMPACT FEES AS MAY BE REASONABLY DETERMINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. THESE REQUIRED IMPACT FEES SHALL BE CALCULATED IN REASONABLE PROPORTION TO THE IMPACT OF THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON PUBLIC FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE: PLEASE STATE HOW THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT SUBSTANTIALLY ADVERSELY IMPACT AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL, OR CULTURAL RESOURCE, INCLUDED ON THE LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL REGISTER, LOCATED ON OR OFF THE PARCEL(S) PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT: Please see attached petition. Please see attached petition. Please see attached petition. APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 We bsite: www.yorkville.il.us A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOMENT, IF APPROVED, IS CONSIDERED A SPECIAL USE. IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, THE FOLLOWING SPECIAL USE STANDARDS OF REVIEW SHALL ALSO BE CONSIDERED: SPECIAL USE STANDARDS PLEASE STATE HOW THE ESTABLISHMENT, MAINTENANCE OR OPERATION OF THE SPECIAL USE WILL NOT BE UNREASONABLY DETRIMENTAL TO OR ENDANGER THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, MOALS, COMFORT, OR GENERAL WELFARE: PLEASE STATE HOW THE SPECIAL USE WILL NOT BE INJURIOUS TO THE USE AND ENJOYMENT OF OTHER PROPRTY IN THE IMMEDATE VICINITY FOR THE PURPOSE "LREADY PERMITTED, N0R SUBSTANTIALLY DIMINISH AND IMPAIR PROPERTY VALUES WITHIN OR NEAR THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN WHICH IT IS TO BE LOCATED: Please see attached petition. Please see attached petition. APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yor kville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 We bsite: www.yorkville.il.us SPECIAL USE STANDARDS PLEASE STATE HOW THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SPECIAL USE WILL NOT IMPEDE THE NORMAL AND ORDELY DEVELOPMENT AND IMPROVEMENT OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY FOR USES PERMITTED IN THE DISTRICT: PLEASE STATE HOW ADEQUATE UTILITIES, ACCESS ROADS, DRAINAGE, OR OTHER NECESSARY FACILITIES HAVE BEEN OR SHALL BE PROVIDED: PLEASE STATE HOW ADEQUATE MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO PROVIDE INGRESS OR EGRESS SO DESIGNED AS TO MINIMIZE TRAFFIC CONGESTION IN THE PUBLIC STREETS: PLEASE STATE HOW THE PROPOSED SPECIAL USE IS NOT CONTRARY TO THE OBJECTIVES OF THE CITY’S ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Please see attached petition. Please see attached petition. Please see attached petition. Please see attached petition. APPLICATION FOR PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us DATE:PZC NUMBER:DEVELOPMENT NAME: PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME:COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP:TELEPHONE: BUSINESS HOME EMAIL:FAX: PROPERTY INFORMATION NAME OF HOLDER OF LEGAL TITLE: IF LEGAL TITLE IS HELD BY A LAND TRUST, LIST THE NAMES OF ALL HOLDERS OF ANY BENEFICIAL INTEREST THEREIN: PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS: TYPE OF REQUEST: PRELIMINARY PLAN AMENDED PREMILINARY PLAN TOTAL LOT ACREAGE:CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION: ATTACHMENTS Petitioner must attach a legal description of the property to this application and title it as “Exhibit A”. (847) 738-5005 APPLICATION FOR PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us ATTORNEY INFORMATION NAME:COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP:TELEPHONE: EMAIL:FAX: ENGINEER INFORMATION NAME:COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP:TELEPHONE: EMAIL:FAX: LAND PLANNER/SURVEYOR INFORMATION NAME:COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP:TELEPHONE: EMAIL:FAX: AGREEMENT I VERIFY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IN THIS APPLICATION IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I UNDERSTAND AND ACCEPT ALL REQUIREMENTS AND FEES AS OUTLINED AS WELL AS ANY INCURRED ADMINISTRATIVE AND PLANNING CONSULTANT FEES WHICH MUST BE CURRENT BEFORE THIS PROJECT CAN PROCEED TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED COMMITTEE MEETING. I UNDERSTAND ALL OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND UNDERSTAND THAT IF AN APPLICATION BECOMES DORMANT IT IS THROUGH MY OWN FAULT AND I MUST THEREFORE FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED ABOVE. OWNER HEREBY AUTHORIZES THE PETITIONER TO PURSUE THE APPROPRIATE ENTITLEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY. PETITIONER SIGNATURE OWNER SIGNATURE DATE DATE THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED PLEASE NOTARIZE HERE: Section 5 Petition for Special Use and PUD Approval 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) COUNTY OF KENDALL ) ) UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ) PETITION FOR SPECIAL USE AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL THE UNDERSIGNED Petitioner, Pioneer Development LLC, an Illinois limited liability company (hereinafter the “Petitioner”), respectfully petitions the United City of Yorkville (the “City”) to grant a Special Use for Planned Unit Development with development allowances as detailed on the plans submitted herewith for the Subject Property (as defined and more fully set forth below). BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. The owners of the Subject Property are Dale L. Konicek LLC, The Konicek Family Limited Partnership, Galena & 47TH LLC, MPLIV10 LLC, and Sameer and Sanjay Gupta (collectively, the “Owners”) as to each parcel as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein; 2. The Petitioner is Pioneer Development, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company located at 30 N. Gould Street #38989, Sheridan, WY 82801; 3. The Petitioner is the contract purchaser of the Subject Property; 4. The Subject Property consists of approximately 1,037 acres located between Route 47, Galena Road, Ashe Road, and Baseline Road in the City, as legally described on Exhibit A attached and incorporated herein (the “Subject Property”) and illustrated on the Concept Site Plan attached as Exhibit B (hereinafter the “Preliminary Plan”); 5. Certain portions of the Subject Property, as shown on Exhibit C attached hereto, have not been annexed to the City, and is the subject property of that certain Application for Annexation submitted to the City by Petitioner on even date herewith; 6. The portion of Subject Property for which Petitioner has applied to be annexed to the City is currently zoned as agricultural; 2 7. A portion of the Subject Property was originally annexed to the City pursuant to Ordinance No. 2005-78 as part of the Westhaven mixed-use residential and commercial planned unit development which was never constructed; 8. A portion of the Subject Property was originally annexed to the City pursuant to Ordinance No. 2004-40 as the Bailey Meadows residential development which was never constructed; 9. The Subject Property within the City is currently zoned as a mixed use residential and commercial planned unit development; 10. The Subject Property is the subject property of that certain Application for Rezoning submitted to the City by Petitioner on even date herewith, whereby Petitioner requests the rezoning of the Subject Property to M-2 General Manufacturing District under the City of Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (the “Code”); 11. Petitioner proposes to develop the Property as a secure data center campus with two onsite electrical substations and one utility switchyard (the “Data Center Campus”), as generally depicted on the Preliminary Plan; 12. The Data Center Campus will be constructed in phases, over an estimated ten (10) year period; 13. The planned unit development will establish standards governing the phased development of the Data Center Campus; 14. As a Data Center Campus, the Subject Property will accommodate up to fourteen (14) stand-alone facilities consisting of networked computers, storage systems, and computing infrastructure used to assemble, process, store, and distribute data; and two (2) onsite electrical substations and one (1) utility switchyard will supply electricity to these facilities; and 15. Petitioner has submitted appropriate supporting details for approval of the Special Use for Planned Unit Development as set forth herein. 3 PROJECT SUMMARY Petitioner is a hyperscale data center developer specializing in advanced digital infrastructure solutions. The proposed Yorkville data center campus is designed to operate with minimal impact on public resources while supporting mission-critical operations. Its electricity consumption is projected to generate significant tax revenue at local and state levels, reinforce the region’s digital infrastructure, and meet the growing hyperscale technology demands of its tenants. The Data Center Campus will be a state-of-the-art facility serving the Chicagoland market’s increasing need for high-performance computing. As shown on the Preliminary Plan, spanning approximately 1,037 acres, the Data Center Campus will include up to fourteen (14) data center buildings, two (2) electrical substations, and one (1) utility switchyard, with improvements potentially spread across fourteen (14) phases. Petitioner will install core utilities and site infrastructure, including the utility switchyard, two (2) substations, seven (7) stormwater management basins, three (3) main access roads with security checkpoints, on-site parking, and perimeter fencing. Each building is expected to become operational within fifteen (15) to twenty-four (24) months of groundbreaking, with the full buildout anticipated in approximately a decade, subject to market conditions. The campus will feature eight (8) secure access points, three (3) of which will be access points to the data respective portions of the data center campus. Two (2) access points are dedicated to ComEd’s electrical switchyard and three to emergency services, these access points will experience minimal traffic and are restricted to authorized ComEd personnel and emergency responders. The switchyard access point lies along the southwest edge of the campus on Galena Road. Primary vehicular ingress and egress to the Data Center Campus buildings will occur through one access point on Ashe Road and two on Route 47. Guard stations and a series of automated gates at each driveway will uphold stringent security protocols. All vehicles will proceed through an electrically actuated fence system, where credentials and identification must be verified before entry. Unauthorized vehicles will be routed to exit via either Ashe Road or Route 47 respectively. Internal pavement design ensures security 4 checks do not impede public traffic. An approximately ten-foot security fence is proposed to encircle the entire campus, including both substations and the switchyard, as shown in the Preliminary Plan. Each building will feature architectural treatments that incorporate elements reminiscent of modern warehouse design that are as aesthetically pleasing as practically possible. Facades will include advanced glazing, refined articulation, precast concrete walls, and metal elements. The first facility is slated for operation in 2029, contingent on power availability, with additional buildings coming online on a ramp schedule as power availability increases and construction schedules allow. Building height is defined at fifty-five feet (55’) to the flat roof, with rooftop equipment bringing total height to a maximum of seventy- eight (78’) feet. Actual building specifications may vary in response to evolving technology or specific tenant requirements. STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USE APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO UDO SECTION 10-8-5(D) 1. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the Special Use will not be unreasonably detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. The proposed Data Center Campus will enhance the public health, safety, morals, comfort, and general welfare of the City. Although portions of the Subject Property were originally annexed to the City in 2004 and 2005, respectively, the Subject Property within the City limits has remained farmland, without a productive use consistent with the underlying mixed-use residential and commercial planned unit development zoning for nearly twenty (20) years. The Data Center Campus is a permitted use in the proposed M-2 General Manufacturing District. The development of the Subject Property as the Data Center Campus will drive substantial investment in the City that will generate new construction jobs, create long- term employment opportunities, and produce significant tax and other revenues. Establishing the Data Center Campus will position the City as a competitive regional leader for future tenants and strengthen its status as an emerging employment center in the data technology sector. 5 2. The Special Use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within or near the neighborhood in which it is to be located. The Subject Property lies entirely within the boundaries of Baseline Road to the North, Ashe Road to the West, Route 47 to the East and Galena Rd to the South. The parcel to the North is separated from the Subject Property by Baseline Road and consists of farmland in Kane County. The parcel to the West, separated from the Subject Property by Ashe Road, consists of residential homes with large setbacks from Ashe Road and more farmland. To the East, across Route 47, lies a multi-family development. Parcels across Galena Road to the South of the Subject Property consist of unincorporated Kendall County farmland and a parcel that is the subject of a proposed data center development, permitted in that manufacturing zoned district. Data centers represent significant capital projects and are often drawn to locations with existing utility infrastructure. However, these locations still typically require substantial installations of utility upgrades to meet data center needs, especially demand for electrical capacity. Such developments, typically funded by institutional investors, yield elevated values within a sub-market and strengthen revenue streams for local governmental entities reliant on property taxes. Accordingly, Petitioner’s proposed investment in the Data Center Campus, along with planned electrical substation upgrades, will appreciably increase, rather than impair or diminish, the value of adjacent properties. 3. The establishment of the Special Use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Pending approval of the Application for Rezoning for the Subject Property to M-2 General Manufacturing District submitted to the City by Petitioner, the City recognizes a data center as an appropriate use for the Subject Property. Petitioner’s application for a special use is not driven by the proposed data center use alone, but by the Petitioner’s proposal for a planned unit development that provides comprehensive standards for multiple data centers in a campus-like configuration developed in phases. By committing to significant infrastructure in the initial phase, the Petitioner seeks assurance that subsequent 6 phases remain governed by these planned unit development standards rather than being subject to future legislative changes. This planned unit development framework will not hinder the normal and orderly development of surrounding properties. Instead, it offers clear, consistent guidelines that may provide neighboring property owners with direction for improvement of their properties. 4. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage or other necessary facilities have been or shall be provided. The Subject Property is well-positioned with regards to access and utilities. Based on significant data center development experience of Petitioner, its engineers and consultants, the ingress and egress to the Data Center Campus proposed by Petitioner herein will adequately serve the intended use. Within the Data Center Campus, the Petitioner has designed a network of drive aisles essential to the campus’s security and operations. All internal aisles will be privately owned, operated, and maintained, thereby minimizing the burden on public facilities and eliminating the City’s responsibility for internal road upkeep. However, Petitioner will grant the City all necessary easements for perpetual private access and utilities, including water line easements as indicated on the Preliminary Plan. Stormwater management basins will be developed in compliance with applicable regulation. Stormwater basins will be enhanced with native vegetation to create open space, establish new habitats, minimize erosion, and promote infiltration, yielding tangible ecological benefits. In coordination with City staff, the Petitioner will determine the most optimal way to enhance the municipal sanitary and water services adjacent to the Subject Property before connecting, representing a potentially substantial investment up-front. By enhancing public infrastructure, Petitioner will position surrounding properties for further investment. 5. Adequate measures shall be taken to provide ingress or egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. Petitioner has engaged engineers and consultants with extensive experience in data center facility design and has developed an efficient, secure ingress and egress plan for the Data Center Campus. Substantial setbacks from Route 47 and Ashe Road are incorporated to prevent traffic queues from 7 extending onto public roadways. Within the Data Center Campus, the drive aisles and gating systems are scaled and spaced to accommodate both arriving vehicles and those denied entry. On Route 47, the two (2) access points are aligned to avoid disrupting the ingress and egress of the Bristol Bay multifamily development to the East. On Ashe Road, the proposed access will not impede traffic flow or other entry to driveways. The Petitioner has retained a traffic engineer to conduct a traffic study to verify roadway capacity, and this study will be provided to the City upon completion. 6. The proposed Special Use is not contrary to the objectives of the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan. According to the Comprehensive Plan adopted by the City in 2016, to guide future industrial development, the City aims to: 1) remove barriers to investment and encourage development through incentives and regulatory relief, 2) focus industrial attraction efforts on near-term industrial, 3) redevelop industrial zones to accommodate diverse facility sizes modern office park settings, 4) Promote best practices in building design, stormwater management, landscaping, and placemaking, and 5) ensure future industrial developments are located near adequate transportation and infrastructure networks. Granting the Special Use for Planned Unit Development to allow the proposed Data Center Campus on the Subject Property aligns with these objectives by removing regulatory barriers and fostering industrial growth. It also provides a framework to promote best practices in building design, stormwater management and landscape buffering. Accordingly, the proposed Special Use is not contrary to the objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and furthers its objectives in the near term. REVIEW STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO UDO SECTION 10-8-8(E) 1. Plan and Policy Alignment. The Planned Unit Development is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and other adopted plans and policy documents of the City. As stated above, the proposed Planned Unit Development aligns with the City’s Comprehensive Plan objectives for industrial development. Approval of a Planned Unit Development ensures coordinated, large-scale planning for this industrial site and creates a structured framework for the phased investment required by a project of this size. 8 2. Integrated Design with Identifiable Centers and Edges. The Planned Unit Development shall be laid out and developed as a unit in accordance with an integrated overall design, in which the various land uses function as a cohesive whole and support one another. The design shall provide identifiable centers, which form focus areas of activity in the development, and edges, which define the outer borders of the development, through the harmonious grouping of buildings, uses, facilities, public gathering spaces, and open space. The Preliminary Plan provides an integrated design featuring three (3) core land uses functioning as a unified whole. A new utility switchyard and two (2) new electric substations will supply power to the fourteen (14) phased data center buildings forming a centralized utility component. The data center buildings, along with parking and access drives, serve as focal points of activity. Perimeter access drives and stormwater ponds define the campus edges, ensuring appropriate drainage for impervious surfaces in compliance with the Code, and creating a cohesive grouping of buildings, infrastructure, and amenities. 3. Public Welfare. The Planned Unit Development is designed, located, and proposed to be operated and maintained so that it will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property and will not substantially increase the danger of fire or otherwise endanger the public health, safety, and welfare. The proposed Planned Unit Development for the Data Center Campus is generally compatible with and consistent with the uses of adjacent parcels. As mentioned above, the parcel to the North is separated from the Subject Property by Baseline Road and consists of farmland in Kane County. The parcel to the West, separated from the Subject Property by Ashe Road, consists of residential homes with large setbacks from Ashe Road and more farmland. To the East, across Route 47, lies a multi-family development. Parcels across Galena Road to the South of the Subject Property consist of unincorporated Kendall County farmland and a parcel that is the subject of a proposed data center development, permitted in that manufacturing zoned district. The planned improvements are concentrated in the core of the Subject Property, with setbacks exceeding zoning requirements. Around the perimeter of the Data Center Campus, stormwater detention basins serve as open space, further protecting the current and future uses on adjacent parcels. 4. Compatibility with Adjacent Land Uses. The Planned Unit Development includes uses which are generally compatible and consistent with the uses of adjacent parcels. If the uses are not generally 9 compatible, all adverse impacts have been mitigated through screening, landscaping, public open space, and other buffering features that protect uses within the development and surrounding properties. As discussed above, the proposed Planned Unit Development for the Data Center Campus is generally compatible with and consistent with the uses of adjacent parcels. The parcel to the North is separated from the Subject Property by Baseline Road and consists of farmland in Kane County. The parcel to the West, separated from the Subject Property by Ashe Road, consists of residential homes with large setbacks from Ashe Road and more farmland. To the East, across Route 47, lies a multi-family development. Parcels across Galena Road to the South of the Subject Property consist of unincorporated Kendall County farmland and a parcel that is the subject of a proposed data center development, permitted in that manufacturing zoned district. Overall, the building setbacks will exceed City Code requirements, and perimeter landscaping and stormwater improvements will create a natural buffer, preserving the suitability of current and future neighboring uses. 5. Impact on Public Facilities and Resources. The Planned Unit Development is designed so that adequate utilities, road access, stormwater management, and other necessary facilities will be provided to serve it. The Planned Unit Development shall include such impact fees as may be reasonably determined by the City Council. These required impact fees shall be calculated in reasonable proportion to the impact of the Planned Unit Development on public facilities and infrastructure. The proposed Data Center Campus Planned Unit Development is designed to ensure sufficient utilities, road access, stormwater management, and other vital facilities. The Preliminary Plan shows a system of stormwater management basins to handle runoff from new impervious surfaces. Roadway access has been addressed in detail. Although public utilities do not currently reach the Subject Property, Petitioner and City staff are coordinating on a plan for extending and interconnecting these utilities. A substantial investment in utilities and other infrastructure will provide opportunity for nearby development. New electrical substations will also be constructed as a key component of the project. Overall, the Data Center Campus Planned Unit Development will not impose a substantial burden on public facilities; rather, it will enhance them in a way that likely spurs further investment on neighboring properties. 6. Archaeological, Historical or Cultural Impact. The Planned Unit Development does not substantially adversely impact an archaeological, historical, or cultural resource, included on the local, state, or federal register, located on or off the parcel(s) proposed for development. 10 The proposed Data Center Campus Planned Unit Development does not substantially impact any archaeological, historical, or cultural resources listed on local, state, or federal registers, whether on or off the Subject Property. The Petitioner is conducting the relevant assessments to evaluate wetlands, waters, threatened/endangered species, and historical resources, and will coordinate any required approvals with the City before constructing improvements. REQUIRED DEVIATIONS FROM UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE 1. Table 10-3-9(A) Bulk and Dimensional Standards. The Code requires the following setbacks: Front: twenty-five feet (25’); Side: twenty feet (20’); and Rear: none (0’). Petitioner requests a deviation that setbacks shall be limited to the outer boundary of the Subject Property. For the purpose of setbacks, Route 47 will serve as the “Front”, Ashe Road will be the “Rear”, and the north and south edges of the Subject Property will be “Sides”. This request includes a waiver of any setback requirements between buildings or setbacks from internal lot lines of any future subdivision. 2. Chapter 10-4-10 Energy Industrial Uses. Under the Code, data centers fall under the “Energy Industrial Use” category, for which there are currently no specific use standards in Chapter 4. Consequently, the proposed Data Center Campus is not subject to any such standards, and any new standards adopted after approval of the Special Use for Planned Unit Development will not apply to the Subject Property. 3. 10-5-1(F) Cross Access. Due to the unique security requirements of the Data Center Campus, any cross-access requirements between adjacent developments, as outlined by the Code, shall be waived for the Subject Property. 4. Table 10-5-1(H)(5) Minimum Parking Requirement. In accordance with the Code, the minimum parking requirement is 0.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet for industrial uses greater than 8,000 square feet. Petitioner requests a variance to reduce that requirement to 0.2 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. The average size of a building in the proposed Data Center Campus is 1,878,142 square feet, requiring 505 parking spaces per building. Petitioner calculates the actual parking demand will be approximately 375 parking spaces per building, under the requested .2 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. Further, parking within the Data Center Campus will be shared among its constituent buildings and lots, rather than calculated on an individual building or lot basis. However, if exclusive occupant parking spaces are designed for a particular lot or building, those spaces will not be counted toward the overall minimum for the remainder of the campus. 5. 10-5-1 (N) Pedestrian Circulation. The Code requires pedestrian walkways between buildings. Where appropriate, the Petitioner will install walkways between parking areas and building entrances, complying with ADA standards. However, there will be no pedestrian connections between buildings or open spaces. Accordingly, 11 the Petitioner requests a waiver of pedestrian circulation requirements, except those necessary to connect each building to its parking area within the Data Center Campus. 6. 10-5-1(O) Bicycle Parking. Under the Code, bicycle parking is required. However, given the surrounding roadways and the Subject Property’s intended use, bicycle access is not feasible. Accordingly, the Petitioner requests a waiver of the bicycle parking requirements. 7. 10-5-1(Q) Required Off-Street Loading Spaces. In accordance with the Code, the Zoning Administrator determines the required number of off- street loading spaces. Petitioner requests a minimum of one off-street loading space per Data Center Campus building on the Subject Property. 8. 10-5-3 Landscape. The Code imposes extensive landscaping requirements in and around parking lots and building areas to enhance community character. Due to the secure nature of the campus and the potential conflicts between landscaping and the mechanical systems unique to a Data Center Campus, the Petitioner seeks to reduce internal landscaped areas. In place of the City’s standard requirements set forth in the Code, the Petitioner proposes to adopt the landscaping standards outlined in the Subject Property’s landscape plan. 9. 10-5-4(B) & (C) Screening of Mechanical Units. The Code mandates screening for both ground-mounted and rooftop-mounted mechanical units. However, due to the nature of the Data Center Campus and its associated mechanical infrastructure, Petitioner proposes an alternative standard. Ground-mounted generator units will be enclosed by vinyl fencing matching the generator’s height (excluding any protruding stacks), while rooftop- mounted mechanical units within penthouses will not be required to have additional screening. 10. 10-5-5 Fences. The Code requires that fencing not extend beyond the front plane of the primary building façade. The Petitioner seeks approval for the fencing specifications and placement as shown on the Preliminary Plan. 11. 10-5-8(4) Appearance Standards, Industrial Uses. Under the Code, industrial buildings longer than 100 feet must include recesses along at least 30% of any facade facing a public street. However, given the significant setbacks in the Data Center Campus layout and the emphasis on open space along its perimeter, Petitioner requests that these architectural standards be waived provided that buildings are constructed with masonry or precast materials. 12. 10-7-2 Lots. Pursuant to the Code, each lot must abut a public street, and the Planning and Zoning Commission along with the City Council retain final authority over lot size, shape, and orientation. However, given the unique, secure nature of the Data Center Campus, Petitioner request that the City waive the public street access requirement and agree to approve any future subdivision of the Subject Property that the Petitioner determines reasonably necessary and appropriate for its use, operation, maintenance, or disposition. 13. 10-7-3 Street Design and Improvements & 10-7-4 Circulation and Connectivity. The Code establishes standards for street development and circulation within a proposed project. However, because this proposal does not include new streets or internal driveways, Petitioner requests exemption from those requirements. 12 WHEREFORE, by reason of the foregoing, the undersigned Petitioner requests the City’s Plan Council, Economic Development Committee, Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council take the necessary and appropriate action to grant a Special Use for Planned Unit Development with development allowances as detailed on the plans submitted herewith for the Subject Property and pursuant to the appropriate provisions of the Code. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 14th day of March, 2025. PETITIONER: PIONEER DEVELOPMENT, LLC an Illinois limited liability company Mahoney, Silverman & Cross, LLC Attorney for the Petitioner 13 EXHIBIT A PINS BY OWNER Galena & 47TH LLC, MPLIV10 LLC PIN: 02-05-300-003 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-032 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-024 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-400-021 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-09-100-031 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-09-100-030 CITY OF YORKVILLE Sanjay & Sameer Gupta PIN: 02-04-100-015 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-200-007 UNINCORPORATED The Konicek Family Limited Partnership PIN: 02-06-100-022 UNINCORPORATED DALE L. KONICEK, LLC PIN: 02-06-200-002 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-400-022 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-200-006 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-100-016 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-06-400-008 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-06-200-003 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-05-100-003 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-05-100-005 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-05-400-009 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-018 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-017 CITY OF YORKVILLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY {Please see attached Section 13 – Legal Descriptions.} 14 EXHIBIT B PRELIMINARY PLAN {Please see attached Section 6 – Conceptual Site Plan.} Section 6 Conceptual Site Plan 150 PARKING SPACES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN BUILDING 3 2 STORY DATA CENTER UTILITY SWITCHYARD CUSTOMER SUBSTATION CUSTOMER SUBSTATION BASELINE ROAD ROUTE 47GALEN A R O A DASHE ROAD SECURITY FENCE SECURITY FENCE SECURITY FENCE FUTURE WATER TANKS 25 FT SETBACK 20 FT SETBACK 20 FT SETBACK ROB ROY CREEKUTILITY CORRIDOR FUTURE UTILITY CORRIDOR 300 PARKING SPACESBUILDING 1 2 STORY DATA CENTER 300 PARKING SPACES150 PARKING SPACESBUILDING 42 STORY DATA CENTER300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES150 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACESBUILDING 122 STORY DATA CENTERBUILDING 2 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 5 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 6 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 7 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 8 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 9 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 10 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 11 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 13 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 14 2 STORY DATA CENTER RESIDENCE DISTRICT 2,000-FT RESIDENCE DISTRICT BUILDING HEIGHT RESTRICTION ZONE RESIDENCE DISTRICT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN DRAINAGE CHANNEL DRAINAGE CHANNEL DRAINAGE CHANNEL TYPE D TRANSITION ZONE - SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS P R O J E C T C A R D I N A L P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NS I T E P L A N A-1 0 3 / 1 4 / 2 0 2 5PLANMAXIMUM F.A.R.N/AN/A MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE85% (38,395,962 SF)41% (18,552,808 SF) MINIMUM LOT SIZEN/AN/A COVERAGE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES 11492 PARKING SPACES5,1943,750 REQUIREDPROVIDED DATA CENTER PARKING RATIO 0.3 SPACES PER 1,000 SF PARKING *SETBACKS APPLY ONLY TO THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PROPERTY IS RESUBDIVIDED, THERE SHALL BE NO SETBACKS APPLICABLE TO INTERNAL LOT LINES. REAR0 FT0 FT SIDEMIN. 10% OF LOT DEPTH, MAX. 20FT20 FT FRONT25 FT25 FT SETBACKS BUILDING HEIGHT55 FT55 FT REQUIREDPROVIDED TOTAL SITE AREA45,171,720 SF (1,037 ACRES) TARGET ZONE CLASSM-2 GENERAL MANUFACTURING SITE DATA TOTAL 8,656,501 SF 17,313,002 SF N/AN/A BUILDING 14 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 13 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 12 390,000 SF 780,000 SF55 FT78 FT BUILDING 11 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 10 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 9 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 8 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 7 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 6 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 5 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 4 390,000 SF 780,000 SF55 FT78 FT BUILDING 3 390,000 SF 780,000 SF55 FT78 FT BUILDING 2 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 1 680,600 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING NUMBER FOOTPRINT AREA TOTAL FLOOR AREA HEIGHT (TOP OF BUILDING) HEIGHT (TOP OF EQUIPMENT) BUILDING AREAS 0'150'300'600' Section 7 Building Elevations SECOND FLOORSECOND FLOOR T.O. ROOFT.O. ROOF 55' - 0"55' - 0" INSULATED METAL PANELINSULATED METAL PANEL GLAZINGGLAZING PRECAST CONCRETEPRECAST CONCRETE VINYL SCREENVINYL SCREEN METAL SCUPPER AND LEADERMETAL SCUPPER AND LEADER INSULATED METAL PANELINSULATED METAL PANEL GLAZINGGLAZINGROOFTOP EQUIPMENTROOFTOP EQUIPMENT PARAPETPARAPET METAL CANOPYMETAL CANOPY ELEVATION LEGEND PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL OR SIMILAR - LIGHT GREYINSULATED METAL PANEL OR SIMILAR - MEDIUM GREYGLAZINGVINYL SCREEN P R O J E C T C A R D I N A L P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NS O U T H E L E V A T I O N A-2 0 3 / 1 4 / 2 0 2 5 SECOND FLOORSECOND FLOOR T.O. ROOFT.O. ROOF 55' - 0"55' - 0" INSULATED METAL PANELINSULATED METAL PANEL GLAZINGGLAZING PRECAST CONCRETEPRECAST CONCRETE VINYL SCREENVINYL SCREEN ROOFTOP EQUIPMENTROOFTOP EQUIPMENT METAL CANOPYMETAL CANOPY ELEVATION LEGEND PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL OR SIMILAR - LIGHT GREYINSULATED METAL PANEL OR SIMILAR - MEDIUM GREYGLAZINGVINYL SCREEN P R O J E C T C A R D I N A L P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NE A S T E L E V A T I O N A-3 0 3 / 1 4 / 2 0 2 5 SECOND FLOORSECOND FLOOR T.O. ROOFT.O. ROOF 55' - 0"55' - 0" INSULATED INSULATED METAL PANELMETAL PANEL GLAZINGGLAZINGPRECAST PRECAST CONCRETECONCRETE VINYL SCREENVINYL SCREEN ROOFTOP EQUIPMENTROOFTOP EQUIPMENT METAL SCUPPER METAL SCUPPER AND LEADERAND LEADER ELEVATION LEGEND PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL OR SIMILAR - LIGHT GREYINSULATED METAL PANEL OR SIMILAR - MEDIUM GREYGLAZINGVINYL SCREEN P R O J E C T C A R D I N A L P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NN O R T H E L E V A T I O N A-4 0 3 / 1 4 / 2 0 2 5 SECOND FLOORSECOND FLOOR T.O. ROOFT.O. ROOF 55' - 0"55' - 0"PRECAST CONCRETEPRECAST CONCRETE VINYL SCREENVINYL SCREEN ROOFTOP EQUIPMENTROOFTOP EQUIPMENT ELEVATION LEGEND PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL OR SIMILAR - LIGHT GREYINSULATED METAL PANEL OR SIMILAR - MEDIUM GREYGLAZINGVINYL SCREEN P R O J E C T C A R D I N A L P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NW E S T E L E V A T I O N A-5 0 3 / 1 4 / 2 0 2 5 Section 8 Landscape Plan L-02 2 L-02 3 L-02 4 L-02 1 CAMPUS ENTRY CAMPUS ENTRY CAMPUS ENTRY 150 PARKING SPACES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN BUILDING 3 2 STORY DATA CENTER UTILITY SWITCHYARD CUSTOMER SUBSTATION CUSTOMER SUBSTATION BASELINE ROAD ROUTE 47GALENA ROADASHE ROADSECURITY FENCE SECURITY FENCE SECURITY FENCE FUTURE WATER TANKS 25 FT SETBACK 20 FT SETBACKROB ROY CREEKUTILITY CORRIDOR FUTURE UTILITY CORRIDOR 300 PARKING SPACESBUILDING 1 2 STORY DATA CENTER 300 PARKING SPACES150 PARKING SPACESBUILDING 42 STORY DATA CENTER300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES150 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACESBUILDING 122 STORY DATA CENTERBUILDING 2 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 5 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 6 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 7 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 8 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 9 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 10 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 11 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 13 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 14 2 STORY DATA CENTER RESIDENCE DISTRICT 2,000-FT RESIDENCE DISTRICT BUILDING HEIGHT RESTRICTION ZONE RESIDENCE DISTRICT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN DRAINAGE CHANNEL DRAINAGE CHANNEL DRAINAGE CHANNEL TYPE D TRANSITION ZONE - SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS LANDSCAPE SURFACING LEGEND 100' TRANSITIONAL TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER BUILDING FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE ZONE PARKING AREA PERIMETER LANDSCAPE ZONE LANDSCAPE SEEDING/PLANTING TBD 300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES150 PARKING SPACESBUILDING 122 STORY DATA CENTERBUILDING 8 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 9 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 10 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 11 2 STORY DATA CENTER DRAINAGE CHANNEL 2000' RESIDENCE DISTRICT BUILDING HEIGHT RESTRICTION ZONE 2000' RESIDENCE DISTRICT BUILDING HEIGHT RESTRICTION ZONE300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACESBUILDING 5 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 6 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 7 2 STORY DATA CENTER 2000' RESIDENCE DISTRICT BUILDING HEIGHT RESTRICTION ZONE 300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACESBUILDING 13 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 14 2 STORY DATA CENTER LANDSCAPE SURFACING LEGEND 100' TRANSITIONAL TYPE D LANDSCAPE BUFFER BUILDING FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE ZONE PARKING AREA PERIMETER LANDSCAPE ZONE LANDSCAPE SEEDING/PLANTING TBD 150 PARKING UTILITY SWITCHYARD 150 PARKING SPACES BUILDING 3 2 STORY DATA CENTER 300 PARKING SPACESBUILDING 1 2 STORY DATA CENTER 300 PARKING SPACES150 PARKING SPACESBUILDING 42 STORY DATA CENTERBUILDING 2 2 STORY DATA CENTER DRAINAGE CHANNEL Section 9 Traffic Impact Analysis Traffic Methodology Memo Project Cardinal PROJECT NO. 182671 R E VISION A MARCH 14, 2025 13737 Noel Road Suite 700 | Dallas, TX 75240 | burnsmcd.com Methodology Memorandum Project Understanding The proposed industrial development is in the City of Yorkville and District 3 of the Illinois Department of Transportation. T he site is generally located south of Baseline Road, North of Galena Road, east of Elda main Road, and west of IL 47. The project site is adjacent to both City and State maintained roadways which will require coordination with both interties. The purposes of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) are to evaluate proposed traffic conditions under build and no-build conditions as it pertains to the proposed development. The TIA will be developed in accordance with the TIA Guidelines contained within the Yorkville, IL Unified Development Ordinance. The proposed scope of services will be performed for normal operating time periods and peak operating time periods. Scope of Services The following sections detail the proposed scope of work. The following guidelines will be followed in the preparation of the traffic impact analysis: • Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition • Yorkville, IL Unified Development Ordinance Traffic Study Guidelines • IDOT Bureau of Design and Environmental Manual Project Information The proposed project site consists of approximately 1,000 acres of Data Center and supporting utility land uses. Two sizes of Data Center buildings are planned for the proposed development, consisting of fourteen (14) total buildings. These include: - Eleven (11) Data Centers at approximately 1,900,000 SF each - Three (3) Data Centers at approximately 940,000 SF each The proposed project site location in relation to Yorkville, IL and Montgomery, IL is shown in Figure 1. A Preliminary Site Plan is shown in Figure 2, depicting general footprint and proposed access locations for the development. Figure 1: Project Site Location 150 PARKING SPACES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN BUILDING 3 2 STORY DATA CENTER UTILITY SWITCHYARD CUSTOMER SUBSTATION CUSTOMER SUBSTATION BASELINE ROAD ROUTE 47GALEN A R O A DASHE ROAD SECURITY FENCE SECURITY FENCE SECURITY FENCE FUTURE WATER TANKS 25 FT SETBACK 20 FT SETBACK 20 FT SETBACK ROB ROY CREEKUTILITY CORRIDOR FUTURE UTILITY CORRIDOR 300 PARKING SPACESBUILDING 1 2 STORY DATA CENTER 300 PARKING SPACES150 PARKING SPACESBUILDING 42 STORY DATA CENTER300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES150 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACES300 PARKING SPACESBUILDING 122 STORY DATA CENTERBUILDING 2 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 5 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 6 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 7 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 8 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 9 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 10 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 11 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 13 2 STORY DATA CENTER BUILDING 14 2 STORY DATA CENTER RESIDENCE DISTRICT 2,000-FT RESIDENCE DISTRICT BUILDING HEIGHT RESTRICTION ZONE RESIDENCE DISTRICT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASIN DRAINAGE CHANNEL DRAINAGE CHANNEL DRAINAGE CHANNEL TYPE D TRANSITION ZONE - SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS P R O J E C T C A R D I N A L P R E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NS I T E P L A N A-1 0 3 / 1 4 / 2 0 2 5PLANMAXIMUM F.A.R.N/AN/A MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE85% (38,395,962 SF)41% (18,552,808 SF) MINIMUM LOT SIZEN/AN/A COVERAGE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES 11492 PARKING SPACES5,1943,750 REQUIREDPROVIDED DATA CENTER PARKING RATIO 0.3 SPACES PER 1,000 SF PARKING *SETBACKS APPLY ONLY TO THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PROPERTY IS RESUBDIVIDED, THERE SHALL BE NO SETBACKS APPLICABLE TO INTERNAL LOT LINES. REAR0 FT0 FT SIDEMIN. 10% OF LOT DEPTH, MAX. 20FT20 FT FRONT25 FT25 FT SETBACKS BUILDING HEIGHT55 FT55 FT REQUIREDPROVIDED TOTAL SITE AREA45,171,720 SF (1,037 ACRES) TARGET ZONE CLASSM-2 GENERAL MANUFACTURING SITE DATA TOTAL 8,656,501 SF 17,313,002 SF N/AN/A BUILDING 14 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 13 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 12 390,000 SF 780,000 SF55 FT78 FT BUILDING 11 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 10 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 9 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 8 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 7 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 6 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 5 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 4 390,000 SF 780,000 SF55 FT78 FT BUILDING 3 390,000 SF 780,000 SF55 FT78 FT BUILDING 2 680,591 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING 1 680,600 SF 1,361,182 SF 55 FT78 FT BUILDING NUMBER FOOTPRINT AREA TOTAL FLOOR AREA HEIGHT (TOP OF BUILDING) HEIGHT (TOP OF EQUIPMENT) BUILDING AREAS 0'150'300'600' 13737 Noel Road Suite 700 | Dallas, TX 75240 | burnsmcd.com Definition of the Study Area The proposed project site is abutted by three IDOT classified roadways and one locally classified roadway, including: • Hwy 47 – Classified as a Other Principal Arterial by IDOT • Galena Road – Classified as a Minor Arterial by IDOT • Ashe Road – Classified as a Minor Arterial by IDOT • Baseline Road – Classified as a Local Street by IDOT Figure 3 depicts the surrounding roadways as classified by IDOT. Figure 3: IDOT Roadway Classifications Traffic Data Collection Traffic data collection will be performed for the periods from 7:00 AM-9:00 AM and 4:00 PM-6:00 PM at the following locations: • Study Int #1 – Eldamain Road at Baseline Road • Study Int #2 – IL 47 at Baseline Road • Study Int #3 – IL 47 at Galena Road • Study Int #4 – Eldamain Road at Galena Road Trip Generation Data Trips generated by the proposed development were calculated based upon the intended land use and density. Generated trips were calculated per Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation methodologies utilizing the current ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. For the purposes of this assessment, Land Use Code 160 – Data Center was referenced. Table 1summarizes resulting trip generation projections for the proposed development considering each building’s respective size and quantity. 13737 Noel Road Suite 700 | Dallas, TX 75240 | burnsmcd.com Table 1: ITE Trip Generation Calculations Development Units AM Hour PM Hour Type Number of Buildings KSF Daily* Total* In* Out* Total* In** Out** 144 MW 11 1880 1861 207 114 93 201 60 141 72 MW 3 940 931 103 57 46 98 29 69 Total 2792 310 171 139 299 89 210 Note: * Average Rate - Referenced Average Rate Equation based on few numbers of studies and less than 0.75 R2 - Weekday: Trips = 0.99 x (Units) - Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street: Trips = 0.11 x (Units) - Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street: Trips = 0.09 x (Units) ** Fitted Curve – Referenced Fitted Curve Equation based on an R2 greater than 0.75 - Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street: Trips = 0.13 x (Units) – 5.63 - Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street: Trips = 0.11 x (Units) – 5.65 Trip Distribution Assumptions Trip distribution for the Traffic Study will be approached through review of historical traffic volumes and collected i ntersection turning movement counts and based on the weighting of traffic demand from currently serviced volumes. Figure 4 depicts the most recent average daily traffic volume data available on IDOT’s online data portal. Figure 4: IDOT Average Annual Daily Traffic Volume [Accessed March 13th , 2025] Background Growth Rate Determination Future background traffic volume growth is anticipated to be based on correspondence with the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP). Following the Traffic Study Scoping Meeting, a request for CMAP growth rates will be prepared. No other area developments are known at this time. Potential area developments that could impact the study area will be requested during the Traffic Study Scoping Meeting. 13737 Noel Road Suite 700 | Dallas, TX 75240 | burnsmcd.com Intersection Capacity Analysis Intersection capacity analysis will be performed to Highway Capacity Manual methodologies using TrafficWare Synchro version 12. Analysis output files will be provided within the appendix of the report. A target LOS of D or better will be referenced for the purpose of considering traffic mitigation strategies. As part of the Traffic Study Scoping meeting, existing traffic signal timing sheets within the study area will be requested. In the event that traffic signal timings are not made available, the project team will reference the collected video-based traffic counts to observe typical existing traffic signal cycle-lengths and optimize software traffic signal timings to the phasing splits. Traffic Analysis Development The Traffic Study will be prepared according to the following outline: I. Introduction II. Project Conditions a. Land Uses b. Roadway System c. Traffic volumes d. Proposed Development i. Land Use Development ii. Roadway Development III. Traffic Forecasts a. Project Traffic Volumes i. Trip Generation ii. Trip Distribution and Assignment b. Background Traffic Volumes c. Future Traffic Volumes IV. Traffic Analysis a. Auxiliary Lane Analysis b. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis (if necessary) c. Capacity Analysis i. Existing Scenario ii. Background Scenario iii. Future with Project Scenario iv. Potential Mitigation Scenario d. Queue Length Analysis e. Site Circulation f. Proposed Lane Configuration V. Conclusions Section 10 Stormwater Calculations Preliminary Drainage Memo Project Cardinal PROJECT NO. 182671 REVISION A MARCH 14, 2025 March 2025 Preliminary Drainage Memo Revision A 1 Overview The Subject Property is approximately 1,037 acres located in Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. The site boundaries are Baseline Road to the north, Galena Road to the south, Ashe Road to the west, and State Route 47 to the east. The proposed development is currently planned to include fourteen (14) data centers, two (2) owner substations, and one (1) ComEd switchyard. The result of these improvements is anticipated to add approximately 663 acres of impervious area. The existing site is primarily undeveloped and agricultural use. There are approximately six (6) acres near the northeast that are utilized for single family residential and a cell tower. The eastern portion of the site appears to drain east to Rob Roy Creek, while the northwestern portion drains west past Ashe Road and the southwestern / south central portion past Galena Road. The FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the Subject Property shows that there are no floodplains within the site. The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) shows a Riverine along the eastern boundary of the site (Rob Roy Creek). According to NRCS Web Soil Survey, the Subject Property is composed of several soil types. These various hydrologic soil groups determine the potential for stormwater runoff. Approximately 27.3% of the site is class C/D, 42.8% class C, and 29.9% class B/D, all of which have moderate to high runoff potential. Maps representing these findings are provided in Appendix D, E, and F. Drainage Narrative The site must follow the regulations set in the Kendall County Stormwater Management Ordinance and the stormwater specifications set in the City of Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance. These regulations require stormwater runoff to be limited to 0.15 cfs/acre in the 100-year storm event, 0.08 cfs/acre in the 25- year storm event, and 0.04 cfs/acre in the 2-year storm event. Additionally, stormwater must be discharged with less flow and in the same locations as prior to development . To meet the County and City requirements for the release rate, the site will be limited to 155.55 cfs in the 100-year event, 82.96 cfs in the 25-year event, and 41.48 cfs in the 2-year event. The proposed drainage plan will consist of multiple inter-connected open channels that tie into stormwater basins. The ComEd utility switchyard will also have a dedicated stormwater basin. The ponds will then be discharged to existing culverts along the western and southern boundaries, and to Rob Roy Creek to the east. Final building layouts and stormwater pond sizing are subject to change, but all ponds will be discharged at a rate in accordance with the County and City requirements noted above. Conclusion It is our opinion that the proposed stormwater management design is compliant with the Kendall County and City of Yorkville stormwater regulations. The proposed drainage channels and stormwater basins for the data centers, substations, and utility switchyard will provide sufficient storage and meet required discharge rates in the proposed condition. Appendix A – Project Location Map The National Map Advanced Viewer Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA 3/13/2025, 1:35:24 PM 0 2,000 4,0001,000 ft 0 740 1,480370 m 1:36,112 USGS 2021 USGS Subject Property Appendix B – Aerial Map The National Map Advanced Viewer USDA, USGS The National Map: Orthoimagery. Data refreshed June, 2024. 3/13/2025, 1:36:21 PM 0 2,000 4,0001,000 ft 0 740 1,480370 m 1:36,112 USGS 2021 USGS Subject Property Appendix C – USGS Topographic Map The National Map Advanced Viewer Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed 3/13/2025, 1:35:00 PM 0 2,000 4,0001,000 ft 0 740 1,480370 m 1:36,112 USGS 2021 USGS Subject Property Appendix D – FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map "# N NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NOTES TO USERS For information and questions about this Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), available products associated with this FIRM, including historic versions, the current map date for each FIRM panel, how to order products, or the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Flood Map Service Center website at https://msc.fema.gov. Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report, and/or digital versions of this map. Many of these products can be ordered or obtained directly from the website. Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Flood Map Service Center at the number listed above. For community and countywide map dates, refer to the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620. Basemap information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by USDA, Farm Service Agency (FSA). This information was derived from NAIP, dated April 11, 2018. SCALE Map Projection: GCS, Geodetic Reference System 1980; Vertical Datum: No elevation features on this FIRM Panel Contains: MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL PANEL 30 OF 225 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500 Feet 0 210 420 630 840105 Meters This map was exported from FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) on 3/10/2025 7:13 PM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. For additional information, please see the Flood Hazard Mapping Updates Overview Fact Sheet at https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/118418 This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. KENDALL COUNTY CITY OF YORKVILLE KANE COUNTY CITY OF PLANO 170341 170347 170896 170346 0030 0030 0030 0030 17093C0030G February 04, 2009 For information about the specific vertical datum for elevation features, datum conversions, or vertical monuments used to create this map, please see the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Report for your community at https://msc.fema.gov SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR DRAFT FIRM PANEL LAYOUT OTHER FEATURES FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A, V, A99 With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile Zone X Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zone X Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee See Notes Zone X Area with Flood Risk due to Levee Zone D NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Levee, Dike, or Floodwall Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17.5 Water Surface Elevation Coastal Transect Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary 8 Effective LOMRs GENERAL STRUCTURES OTHER AREAS OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS B 20.2 1 inch = 1,000 feet 1:12,000 88°30'W 41°44'22.65"N 88°26'14.16"W 41°40'11.3"N Subject Property Appendix E – National Wetland Inventory Map Wetlands U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Standards and Support Team, wetlands_team@fws.gov Wetlands Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond Lake Other Riverine March 10, 2025 0 0.7 1.40.35 mi 0 1 20.5 km 1:40,817 This page was produced by the NWI mapper National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. Subject Property Appendix F – Hydrologic Soil Groups Map Hydrologic Soil Group—Kane County, Illinois, and Kendall County, Illinois Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/10/2025 Page 1 of 546178004618200461860046190004619400461980046202004617800461820046186004619000461940046198004620200376100376500376900377300377700378100378500378900379300379700380100 376100 376500 376900 377300 377700 378100 378500 378900 379300 379700 380100 41° 43' 32'' N 88° 29' 23'' W41° 43' 32'' N88° 26' 23'' W41° 42' 5'' N 88° 29' 23'' W41° 42' 5'' N 88° 26' 23'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 16N WGS84 0 500 1000 2000 3000 Feet 0 250 500 1000 1500 Meters Map Scale: 1:19,100 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Kane County, Illinois Survey Area Data: Version 18, Aug 21, 2024 Soil Survey Area: Kendall County, Illinois Survey Area Data: Version 21, Aug 21, 2024 Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey area. These survey areas may have been mapped at different scales, with a different land use in mind, at different times, or at different levels of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil properties, and interpretations that do not completely agree across soil survey area boundaries. Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 3, 2019—Aug 24, 2019 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Hydrologic Soil Group—Kane County, Illinois, and Kendall County, Illinois Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/10/2025 Page 2 of 5 Hydrologic Soil Group Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 206A Thorp silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes C/D 0.0 0.0% 679A Blackberry silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes C 0.1 0.0% 679B Blackberry silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes C 0.0 0.0% Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 0.1 0.0% Totals for Area of Interest 1,101.1 100.0% Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 59A Lisbon silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes C/D 194.9 17.7% 60B2 La Rose silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded C 24.4 2.2% 60C2 La Rose silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded C 35.2 3.2% 104A Virgil silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes B/D 15.1 1.4% 148C2 Proctor silt loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes, eroded B 3.5 0.3% 149A Brenton silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes B/D 126.2 11.5% 152A Drummer silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes B/D 104.6 9.5% 154A Flanagan silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes C/D 12.4 1.1% 191A Knight silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes C/D 15.5 1.4% 198A Elburn silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes B/D 66.7 6.1% 206A Thorp silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes C/D 66.8 6.1% 330A Peotone silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes C/D 10.9 1.0% 356A Elpaso silty clay loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes B/D 13.4 1.2% 512A Danabrook silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes C 61.4 5.6% Hydrologic Soil Group—Kane County, Illinois, and Kendall County, Illinois Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/10/2025 Page 3 of 5 Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 512B Danabrook silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes C 155.7 14.1% 663A Clare silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes C 4.4 0.4% 663B Clare silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes C 90.1 8.2% 667B Kaneville silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes C 0.0 0.0% 668B Somonauk silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes C 0.6 0.1% 679A Blackberry silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes C 78.7 7.1% 679B Blackberry silt loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes C 20.5 1.9% Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 1,100.9 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 1,101.1 100.0% Hydrologic Soil Group—Kane County, Illinois, and Kendall County, Illinois Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/10/2025 Page 4 of 5 Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Hydrologic Soil Group—Kane County, Illinois, and Kendall County, Illinois Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/10/2025 Page 5 of 5 Section 11 Security Fencing Security Fencing Project Cardinal PROJECT NO. 182671 R EVISION A MARCH 14, 2025 March 2025 Security Fencing Revision A 1 Pioneer Development Proposed Security Fence Details Option A: Ameristar Perimeter Security USA Inc 1. Product Name: Ameristar Impasse II 2. Description: Ornamental high security fence system 3. Fence Height: 10’-0” overall including foundation elements 4. Finish/Color: Power coated black (all elements) Option B: Betafence USA (Guardiar) 1. Product Name: Palisade 2. Description: Ornamental high security fence system 3. Fence Height: 10’-0” overall including foundation elements 4. Finish/Color: Powder coated black (all elements) Appendix A – Ameristar Impasse II AMERISTARFENCE.COM | 800-321-8724 FENCE PRODUCTS HIGH SECURITY STEEL PALISADE FENCING 2 Learn more online at ameristarfence.com or by calling 800.321.8724 AESTHETIC APPEAL. UNPARALLELED PROTECTION. Traditional security fences of chain link or wire mesh are no longer enough to meet todays increased security demands. Ameristar’s Impasse II security fence offers the resistive strength of heavy-duty steel pales secured vertically to a framework of specially formed rails and I-beam posts. The stylish design of the Impasse II, combined with its strength and security, provides a successful first line of defense. 3IMPASSE II ® | High Security Steel Palisade Fence AESTHETIC APPEAL. UNPARALLELED PROTECTION. Primary applications for Impasse II ornamental steel fence systems include: Military Sites Government Facilities Petroleum & Chemical Facilities Power Plants & Substations Airports Data Centers Ports of Entry Water Treatment & Storage j j j j j j j j 4 Learn more online at ameristarfence.com or by calling 800.321.8724 STRONGHOLD™ TRIDENT ™ The Impasse Trident pale rises above the topmost rail and terminates with a menacing triple-pointed splayed spear tip. The intimidating look of the Trident corrugated pale is a visual deterrent to any who would dare to intrude. 3-RAIL PANELS | 6', 7', 8', 9' & 10' HEIGHTS 2-RAIL PANELS | 6', 7' & 8' HEIGHTS The blunt, slightly rounded tip of the Stronghold offers strength when necessary, while providing safety and security to the general public. The Stronghold features the same structural configurations of its high-security counterparts. 3-RAIL PANELS | 6', 7', 8', 9' & 10' HEIGHTS 2-RAIL PANELS | 6', 7' & 8' HEIGHTS j j j j HIGH SECURITY STEEL PALISADE FENCE 5IMPASSE II ® | High Security Steel Palisade Fence ANTI-SCALE OPTION Gauntlet is designed with high-tensile steel corrugated pales that rise above the topmost rail with an outward curve and terminate with a triple-pointed splayed spear tip. The outward curved pales discourage attempts to gain access by would be intruders. 3-RAIL PANELS | 7', 8', 9' & 10' HEIGHTS 2-RAIL PANELS | 7' & 8' HEIGHTS j j 8¾" GAUNTLET ™ 2.75"w x 14ga PALES | 2" x 2" x 11ga RAILS | 3" x 2.75" x 12ga & 4" x 2.75" x 11ga I-BEAM POSTS The Impasse II Anti-Scale fence system has decreased pale spacing, which helps deter the assailant from climbing, and increases the delay time when trying to cut or pry through the fence. COLOR OPTIONS BLACK SANDBRONZE WHITE Custom colors also available 6 Learn more online at ameristarfence.com or by calling 800.321.8724 Impasse II is protected by the unique PermaCoat process. Our PRE-GALVANIZED STEEL BASE MATERIAL is subjected to an 11-STAGE PROCESS to cleanse & prepare the steel for a DUAL TOP-COAT FINISH. PermaCoat’s corrosion resistant abilities far surpass those of painted surfaces and have a “no-mar” polyester powder top coat. This dual coating not only provides RESISTANCE FROM WEATHERING but also reduces scratch & burnishing marks typically encountered during shipping. EPOXY POWDER COAT Epoxy powder is electrostatically applied EPOXY GEL OVEN Powder is gelled & cured to finish coat FINISH CURING OVEN Seals finish for years of maintenance free use POLYESTER POWDER TGIC powder is electro-statically applied 4 PHOSPHATE RINSE Corrosion resistant layer that assists in bonding powder coating CLEAR WATER RINSE A bit of clean H2O to prep for the next phase ALKALINE WASH Cleans metal for proper adhesion of zinc phosphate 1 2 8 9 10 11 3 4 FIXIDINE RINSE Rinses excess alkaline prior to zinc phosphate application DOUBLECOATINGPRE-TREATMENT PERMACOAT ™ 7IMPASSE II ® | High Security Steel Palisade Fence ONCE COMPLETED, THESE 7-STAGES WILL HAVE REMOVED EVERYTHING FROM THE SURFACE OF THE STEEL THAT MIGHT INHIBIT THE FINISH FROM PROPERLY ADHERING DURING THE NEXT 4-STAGES OF THE COATING PROCESS.CORROSIONTESTING5 6 7 DRYING OVEN Eliminates all moisture prior to double coating CLEAR WATER RINSE Final wash in H2O to remove any excess debris or particles NON-CHROMATE SEAL Barrier to prevent moisture from reaching base metal 3,500 HOURS PERMACOAT PROCESS Zinc Phosphate + Epoxy Powder Coat + Polyester Powder Coat 1,500 HOURS SINGLE COAT PROCESS Zinc Phosphate + Polyester Powder Coat 200 HOURS SINGLE COAT PROCESS Iron Phosphate + Polyester Powder Coat 168 HOURS PRIMED & PAINTED STEEL 100 HOURS PAINTED STEEL Corrosion occurs more easily without the proper preparation & protection, which is why Ameristar has put our fence products to the test based on ASTM B117 standards. The results speak for themselves. 8 Learn more online at ameristarfence.com or by calling 800.321.8724 Impasse II panels and posts are manufactured using HIGH-TENSILE PRE-GALVANIZED G-90 STEEL. Each component has been ROLL-FORMED into a unique profile that yields significant strength properties. Impasse II’s distinct design enables the fence to TRAVERSE AGGRESSIVE CHANGES IN GRADE IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN SECURITY along any perimeter. Each connection point of the Impasse II system is secured with TAMPER-PROOF FASTENERS providing the HIGHEST LEVEL OF SECURITY & VERSATILITY. PERMACOAT ™ PRIVACY SCREENING OPTION A security fence should cover multiple aspects of perimeter security, which is why Ameristar created the steel privacy screening option for its Impasse high security fence system. Secured by each adjacent pale, the overlapping design achieves the maximum level of opacity for visual screening. FASTENER Security fastener prevents tampering or removal by typical tools POST CAP Cast aluminum cap adds beauty and provides closure I-BEAM POST Specifically formed I-beam; pre-punched for rail attachment with pass through integrated design features HIGH STRENGTH RAIL Specifically formed for strength through architectural shape; lower lip contoured to conceal & carry security elements such as anti-ram cabling, IDS, etc. STEEL PALES Specifically formed high strength corrugated architectural shape resists prying or bending; bolt holes are recessed to prevent bolt head from chiseling Impasse II Gauntlet shown IMPASSABLE DESIGN 9IMPASSE II ® | High Security Steel Palisade Fence PRIVACY SCREENING OPTION When installing these security elements use Impasse II as a platform: Communication & Video Cables Intrusion Detection / Fiber Optic Cables Access Control Wiring Conduits Anti-Ram Cabling (Stalwart IS) j j j j j DESIGN INTEGRATION The Impasse II framework is a raceway for wiring, conduits & security cabling required around the perimeter of a project. This integrated design eliminates the need for costly trenching & boring becoming a value added solution for perimeter security upgrades. (inside of rail shown above / view from protected side) RAKEABLE VS STAIR-STEP Biasability at a minimum of 25% that requires no additional assembly. This unique feature eliminates unsightly stair-stepping panels. Fully rakeable panels Stair-stepping panels Ameristar is committed to providing products that meet the Buy American Act Ameristar products have the opportunity to earn LEED points Certified by the US Department of Homeland Security as a method of risk management against acts of terrorism Ameristar’s Impasse II is backed by over 30 years of excellence in the fencing industry 10 Learn more online at ameristarfence.com or by calling 800.321.8724 Stalwart IS unites the strongest security fence available with the most widely used anti-ram perimeter barrier. The appearance of Stalwart IS is a great visual deterrent that delivers strength and fortitude for keeping any assailant from easily breaching the perimeter. Stalwart IS offers multiple anti-ram ratings. Each installation can be designed with the most appropriate standoff distance from the asset. ARCHITECTURAL SUPPORT SOLUTION SPECIALISTS Ameristar’s Project Solution Specialists are experienced in every facet of perimeter security design. Our goal is to assist the architectural community in finding the best perimeter & entry solutions for their projects. Ameristar’s extensive library of project photos, CAD drawings, architectural specifications & project budget quotes are just a few of the services our team offers to complete your project design. & ANTI-RAM BARRIER + SECURITY FENCE 11IMPASSE II ® | High Security Steel Palisade Fence &SLIDE GATES SWING GATES Egress & ingress requirements are unique to each application. Managing traffic flow & usage demands are of the utmost importance, which is why Impasse II is manufactured in a variety of gate types built to balance function, security & beauty. Ameristar Transport™ & Passport™ sliding gates perfectly match the perimeter fence system to create a seamless & stunning design while exuding a commanding presence of security built to unite perimeter and entry. AMERISTARFENCE.COM | 800-321-8724 FENCE PRODUCTS KNOWLEDGE & EXPERIENCE Ameristar was chartered over 30 years ago in response to the demand by consumers & specifiers for specialty fence products. Ameristar offers an aesthetically pleasing product that is both high in quality & affordability. This has been achieved by maximizing high-volume productivity, increasing product design strength, and promoting simplistic installation. PROVEN CAPABILITY Ameristar’s integrated in-house process & extensive raw material inventory results in much improved productivity and availability compared to the competition. By having a vast finished goods inventory, Ameristar is capable of delivering finished products faster than competitors who sublet the majority of their operations. INDUSTRY LEADERSHIP Over the years Ameristar has continually raised the bar across the board in the manufacturing of high quality, innovative fencing products. Our demonstrated commitment to upholding higher values translates into superior products that go far beyond merely meeting minimum industry standards. WHY CHOOSE AMERISTAR Ameristar's world headquarters, manufacturing & coil processing facilities in Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. LEGEND ★ Ameristar Headquarters ● Sales & Service Centers #9718 | REVISED 10/2021 Appendix B – Betafence Palisade PUBLIC SPACES & BUILDINGS LOW HIGH DESIGN BENEFITS Deter and delay The Palisade system presents an architecturally-pleasing security barrier designed to deter attacks and discourage scaling. The high-strength steel construction delays intrusion attempts by enough time for security response teams to deploy effectively. Fast and flexible installation Because of its unique rail support, Palisade is fast and easy to install, even on sloping surfaces. Depending on security requirements, rail and post spacing is fully customizable. Seamless integration This barrier solution can be integrated with Intrusion Detection and other electronic security components, protecting cabling through a raceway of steel rails within the framework of the Palisade Fence System. Anti-ram barrier add on available Anti-Ram Barriers can be integrated into Palisade or installed as a stand-alone solution providing formidable resistance to vehicular attack. INFRASTRUCTURE& TRANSPORT DISSUASION FACTORIES &LOGISTICS EDUCATIONALFACILITIES • Flexible and fast installation • Integration-ready raceways • Covers a wide range of protection requirements • 15 Year warranty • Superior anti-corrosion coatings DELAY DETERRENT Palisade ARCHITECTURAL SECURITY BARRIER Product detail Security level FunctionalitiesApplications Pinnacle Round Top Defender Splayed Pinnacle Splayed PALISADE STANDARD CONFIGURATIONS Panel Height Pales Air Spacing Rails Posts 8’, 10’15 ga.3-1/4” 2” TS x 14 ga.3” TS x 12 ga 4” TS x 11 ga. Complete Range Panels Panels feature strong and secure steel pales available in two designs depending on security and architectural requirements. Available in 8’ and 10’ heights. Posts and rails Panels are installed on rails in front of the posts, allowing for a finished and seamless appearance. This configuration allows for faster installation – and means that exact post spacings are not a requirement. Gates Choose from a wide range of gate styles including pedestrian and vehicular swing gates, as well as slide and cantilever gates. Superior Coating Palisade panels and gates are manufactured with galvanized tubular steel, then protected by Betafence’s exclusive Super-Durable powder coating. This coating provides longer protection from U.V. rays and salt spray than either E-Coat or standard polyester coatings. Surveillance friendly Surveillance systems have unobstructed visibility of activity behind the fence. Warranty Palisade is backed by a 15-Year Manufacturer’s Warranty, giving you the peace of mind that the world’s leading producer of fencing stands behind this product.211223betafence.com/contact Betafence 3309 SW Interstate 45, Ennis, TX 75119 USA Tel: +1 972 878 7000 | +1 888 650 4766 Betafence is the world market leader in fencing solutions, access control and detection for perimeter protection. All Betafence companies and product names are trademarks owned by PRÆSIDIAD Group Limited. Modification in products and assortment are subject to change without prior notice. Proud to be a PRÆSIDIAD brand, Betafence is part of a global network, working alongside Guardiar and Hesco as a leader in perimeter security systems and solutions. For more information please visit praesidiad.com. Section 12 Annexation Map Section 13 Legal Description 1 PINS BY OWNER Galena & 47TH LLC, MPLIV10 LLC PIN: 02-05-300-003 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-032 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-024 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-400-021 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-09-100-031 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-09-100-030 CITY OF YORKVILLE Sanjay & Sameer Gupta PIN: 02-04-100-015 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-200-007 UNINCORPORATED The Konicek Family Limited Partnership PIN: 02-06-100-022 UNINCORPORATED DALE L. KONICEK, LLC PIN: 02-06-200-002 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-400-022 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-200-006 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-100-016 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-06-400-008 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-06-200-003 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-05-100-003 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-05-100-005 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-05-400-009 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-018 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-017 CITY OF YORKVILLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OWNER: Sanjay & Sameer Gupta PARCEL 1: THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 5 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE WEST 40 CHAINS (RECORD), 2652.01 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH 38 1/2 LINKS (RECORD), 24.51 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTH BANK OF A DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES EAST (RECORD), NORTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST (MEASURED), 2593.76 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST, 232.55 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 68.93 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 59 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 68.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 265.04 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST, 57.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE 2 GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 4 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH ON THE SECTION LINE 26.80 CHAINS; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, 14.30 CHAINS; THENCE IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, 20.67 CHAINS EAST OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SECTION LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF LOT 2 LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE; BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 265.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 531.35 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 27 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 509.62 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST 150.53 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST, PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 912.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SAID POINT BEING 364.44 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4 (AS MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH LINE) AND SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF TERMINUS; IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. OWNER: Galena & 47th LLC and MPLIV10LLC PARCEL 1: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 19 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 990.0 FEET (15 CH.) TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 19 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 1.84 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 152 AT PAGE 392; THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 56 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 1722.34 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT 907257 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 128.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 19 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 10.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 787.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, BEING A CIRCULAR CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1596.42 FEET CONCAVE TO THE WEST, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 13 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST, 773.94 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, SAID POINT BEARING NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, 719.99 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, BEING A CIRCULAR CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1596.42 FEET CONCAVE TO THE WEST, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST, 205.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 45 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 88.42 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE CHICAGO-GALENA ROAD; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST, 41.71 FEET TO AN EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 152 AT PAGE 392; THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 267.87 FEET TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID 3 SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 9.74 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE NORTH 27 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 366.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 756.55 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING FROM SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 02 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, 581.48 FEET TO A POINT OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, 22.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 AND THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON ROD MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREE 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1,550.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST 409.15 FEET PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 221.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST 115.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST 196.55 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 1,336.52 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST 600.81 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF GALENA ROAD AS NOW ESTABLISHED; THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 677.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 348.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST 599.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST 750.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 3: THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER 642.93 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 162.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 102 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WITH THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, MEASURED CLOCKWISE THEREFROM, 100.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 169.50 FEET, AS MEASURED PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE SOUTHERLY OF SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE, 14.66 FEET TO THE PRESENT CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD AS DEPICTED ON A PLAT RECORDED JUNE 5, 1964 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 145193; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PRESENT CENTER LINE, 1675.69 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PRESENT CENTER LINE BEING ALONG A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 42,975.00 FEET, 933.19 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG SAID PRESENT CENTER LINE, 64.12 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 957.16 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5, 920.88 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 2,316.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST 4 QUARTER; THENCE EASTERLY, 2,651.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF WHICH IS 2,326.70 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF, 2,686.96 FEET TO SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE, 101.94 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. OWNER: Dale L. Konicek, LLC TRACT 1: THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 5 AND THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 4, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON PIPE MONUMENT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREE 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1730.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 362.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST 2025.23 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT 73-2720; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 1,222.89 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 577.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 49 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 298.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST 15.64 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257; (THE NEXT 5 CALLS ARE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257) THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 170.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 1,000.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 36.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 925.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 2: THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST, LYING NORTHERLY OF A LINE EXTENDING EASTERLY FROM A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 2316 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION, 2326.7 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY LINE PURSUANT TO DOCUMENT 73-2720, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ALSO; THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTH ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 2460.05 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE MOST SOUTHERLY LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED JULY 15, 1966 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 35339, BY A DEED DATED JANUARY 31, 1972 AND RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1972 AS DOCUMENT 72-467 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PROPERTY CONVEYED TO LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 35339, WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 27 SECONDS TO THE 5 LEFT WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 812.66 FEET, THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 49 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 366.94 FEET, THENCE EASTERLY 88 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 04 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 809.73 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 378.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ALSO; THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTH ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 2474.60 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED, THENCE WESTERLY ON A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 19 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 812.66 FEET, THENCE NORTH ALONG A LINE 89 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 03 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1.61 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE MOST SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED JULY 15, 1966 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 35339 BY DEED DATED JANUARY 31, 1972 AND RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1972 AS DOCUMENT 72-467, THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, A DISTANCE OF 812.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID EAST LINE, 13.55 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 3: LOT 2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 5 (EXCEPT THAT PART DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE WEST 40 CHAINS TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT, THENCE NORTH 38 1/2 LINKS TO THE SOUTH BANK OF DITCH, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 40 CHAINS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, 1961.60 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 667.0 FEET, THENCE SOUTH AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID NORTH LINE, 396.0 FEET, THENCE WEST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 667.0 FEET, THENCE NORTH AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 396.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 5 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE WEST 40 CHAINS (RECORD), 2652.01 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE NORTH 38 1/2 LINKS (RECORD), 25.41 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTH BANK OF A DITCH, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST (RECORD), NORTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST (MEASURED), 2593.76 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST, 232.55 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 68.93 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 59 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 68.88 6 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 265.04 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST, 57.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING) IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 4: THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 4, LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 265.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 531.35 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 27 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 509.62 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST 150.53 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST, PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 110.00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 912.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SAID POINT BEING 364.44 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4 (AS MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH LINE) AND SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF TERMINUS, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 5: PARCEL 1: THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 4, PART OF SECTION 5, PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD AS NOW ESTABLISHED ACROSS SAID SECTION 5 WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 2673.13 FEET TO A POINT 2327.34 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST 1323.10 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 2325.56 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1319.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 1828.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES EAST 3596.80 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 781.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 300.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 40 MINUTES EAST 291.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST 240.28 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 01 SECONDS EAST 1428.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 991.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST 1745.17 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 1373.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 600.81 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID GALENA ROAD; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 44 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, 3318.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, 7 EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN LYING SOUTH OF A LINE EXTENDING EASTERLY FROM A POINT ON SAID WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 WHICH POINT IS 1876.07 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5 TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 5 WHICH POINT IS 1828.85 FEET SOUTH OF SAID NORTH QUARTER CORNER, AND EXCEPT A STRIP OF LAND 205.00 FEET WIDE IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 AND THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1828.85 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 10, 1967, KNOWN AS TRUST NO. 35913 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 154368 IN BOOK 152, PAGE 392 AS SAID NORTH LINE IS MONUMENTED AND OCCUPIED, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS LINE "B", FOR THE POINT OR BEGINNING; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID LINE "B", A DISTANCE OF 3596.80 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF ROB ROY DITCH FORMING AN ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 57 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 205.00 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 205.00 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANT SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE AFORESAID LINE "B"; THENCE WEST ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 3598.47 FEET TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE 205.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND ALSO EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID SECTION 4 LYING EAST OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. AND ALSO EXCEPTING: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 AND THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON ROD MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE 1,550.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST 409.15 FEET PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 221.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST 115.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST 196.55 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 1336.52 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST 600.81 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF GALENA ROAD AS NOW ESTABLISHED; THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 677.76 FEET, THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 348.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST 599.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST 750.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AND ALSO EXCEPTING, THAT PART CONVEYED BY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 30, 2007 AS DOCUMENT 200700026496, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 5 AND THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 4, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON PIPE MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST 8 LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1730.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 362.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST 2026.23 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT 73-2720; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 1,222.89 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 577.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 298.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST 15.64 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257; (THE NEXT 5 CALLS ARE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257) THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 170.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST, 1,000.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 38.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 925.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 AND NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SECTION LINE 1331.4 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 00 SECONDS MEASURED FROM WEST TO SOUTH FROM THE SECTION LINE, 2321.5 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, MEASURED FROM NORTH TO WEST FROM THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 1328.7 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE SECTION LINE, FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 00 SECONDS MEASURED FROM EAST TO SOUTH FROM THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 146.4 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, MEASURED FROM NORTH TO WEST FROM THE SECTION LINE, 1553 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, MEASURED FROM EAST TO NORTH FROM THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 2461.1 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 6; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1534 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, LYING SOUTH AND WEST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT 1876.07 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY BY DOCUMENT NO. R73-2841 (TRACT 1); THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1133.17 TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 415.0 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANT EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO EARL P. AND EMMA V. KONICEK BY DEED RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 136414 IN BOOK 126, PAGE 41; THENCE NORTH ON SAID PARALLEL LINE, ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO SAID COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY BY DOCUMENT NO. R73-2841, 1897.19 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6 AND THE POINT OF TERMINATION; AND ALSO EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE EXTENDED EASTERLY FROM A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF 9 SECTION 5 WHICH POINT IS 1876.07 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5 TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SECTION 5, WHICH POINT IS 1828.85 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5, ALL IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 6: PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 6; TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 3407.85 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO SUSAN SCHMIDT BY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 1929 IN BOOK 80, PAGES 334 AND 335; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO SUSAN SCHMIDT A DISTANCE OF 1552.74 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO EARL P KONICEK AND WIFE BY WARRANTY DEED DATED DECEMBER 4, 1961 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 136414, THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO EARL P. KONICEK AND WIFE 1240.82 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD, FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH ALONG THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE 919.13 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT WHICH IS 1312.43 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANCE NORTH OF SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 26 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 35 SECOND TO THE RIGHT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 332.08 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF PARCEL TWO OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 45553 BY CONSERVATORS DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1973 AS DOCUMENT 73-4671; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 62 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 01 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE 646.8 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF BEECHER ROAD; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 1362.40 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 460.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ALSO, THAT PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 70 DEGREES 55 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 276 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 8, 200 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 55 MINUTES EAST 270 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1456.6 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 470.51 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL TWO OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 45553 BY CONSERVATORS DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1973 AS DOCUMENT R73-4671; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 1006.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL TWO 388.83 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID NORTH LINE WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN PARCEL ONE OF SAID DOCUMENT 73-4671; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL ONE A DISTANCE OF 115.02 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL ONE WHICH IS 1112.06 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANCE NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE 26 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 38 SECOND TO THE LEFT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE 10 OF 2329.35 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO DIANE R. KAPCHINSKI BY TRUSTEES DEED RECORDED JUNE 14, 1973 AS DOCUMENT 73-28243; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO DIANE R. KAPCHINSKI 812.68 FEET TO THE EAST LIEN OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, 1319.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, EXCEPT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION INCLUDED IN THE WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 24, 2020 AS DOCUMENT 202000016040. OWNER: The Konicek Family Limited Partnership A PART OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND PART OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE EAST 19.508 CHAINS (1,287.528 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE FOR PLACE OF BEGINNING, THENCE EAST ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, 44.599 CHAINS (2,943.534 FEET), THENCE SOUTH 16 MINUTES WEST 56.242 CHAINS (3,711.972 FEET) TO THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 58 MINUTES WEST 3.473 CHAINS (229.218 FEET) ALONG THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 37 MINUTES WEST 52.777 CHAINS (3,483.282 FEET) ALONG THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 16 MINUTES WEST 8.03 CHAINS (529.98 FEET) ALONG THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 05 MINUTES EAST 10.258 CHAINS (677.028 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 01 MINUTE WEST 6.632 CHAINS (437.712 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 27 DEGREES 51 MINUTES EAST 11.60 CHAINS (765.6 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES EAST 11.535 CHAINS (761.31 FEET) TO THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 12 DEGREES 40 MINUTES EAST TO THE PLACE OF THE BEGINNING, SITUATED IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, EXCEPTING THEREFROM RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED FOR ASHE ROAD AND GALENA ROAD AND ALSO; EXCEPTING, THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 19.508 CHAINS (1287.53 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 40 MINUTES WEST, 22.655 CHAINS (1495.23 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES WEST, 11.535 CHAINS (761.31 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST, 765.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 DEGREES 01 MINUTES EAST, 437.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 05 MINUTES WEST, 637.63 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GALENA ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 77 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GALENA ROAD, 187.93 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 77 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE 136.30 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING EASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 14,285.00 FEET AND CHORD BEARING SOUTH 78 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST, 189.98 FEET TO A POINT OF BEND IN SAID RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 14 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 51 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, 20.02 FEET TO A POINT OF BEND; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 14,265.00 FEET AND CHORD BEARING SOUTH 79 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 453.85 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENT; THENCE SOUTH 80 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 38 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, 29.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST, 528.48 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST, 810.97 FEET; THENCE 11 SOUTH 10 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, 541.53 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ALSO EXCEPTING, THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING DESCRIBED BY COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 19.508 CHAINS (1287.53 FEET) TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EQUESTRIAN ESTATES AT LEGACY FARMS; THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 40 MINUTES WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND SAID EAST LINE EXTENDED SOUTHERLY, 22.655 CHAINS (1495.23 FEET); THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES EAST, 29.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ASHE ROAD AS RELOCATED FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 618.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 35 MINUTES EAST, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 355.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES EAST, A DISTANCE OF 683.60 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ASHE ROAD; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1482.39 FEET, WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 10 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, 360.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 1 PINS BY OWNER Galena & 47TH LLC, MPLIV10 LLC PIN: 02-05-300-003 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-032 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-024 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-400-021 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-09-100-031 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-09-100-030 CITY OF YORKVILLE Sanjay & Sameer Gupta PIN: 02-04-100-015 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-200-007 UNINCORPORATED The Konicek Family Limited Partnership PIN: 02-06-100-022 UNINCORPORATED DALE L. KONICEK, LLC PIN: 02-06-200-002 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-400-022 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-200-006 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-100-016 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-06-400-008 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-06-200-003 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-05-100-003 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-05-100-005 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-05-400-009 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-018 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-017 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-06-400-001 UNINCORPORATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OWNER: Sanjay & Sameer Gupta PARCEL 1: THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 5 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE WEST 40 CHAINS (RECORD), 2652.01 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH 38 1/2 LINKS (RECORD), 24.51 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTH BANK OF A DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES EAST (RECORD), NORTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST (MEASURED), 2593.76 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST, 232.55 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 68.93 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 59 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 68.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 265.04 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST, 57.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, 2 RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 4 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH ON THE SECTION LINE 26.80 CHAINS; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, 14.30 CHAINS; THENCE IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, 20.67 CHAINS EAST OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SECTION LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF LOT 2 LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE; BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 265.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 531.35 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 27 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 509.62 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST 150.53 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST, PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 912.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SAID POINT BEING 364.44 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4 (AS MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH LINE) AND SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF TERMINUS; IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. OWNER: Galena & 47th LLC and MPLIV10LLC PARCEL 1: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 19 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 990.0 FEET (15 CH.) TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 19 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 1.84 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 152 AT PAGE 392; THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 56 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 1722.34 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT 907257 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 128.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 19 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 10.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 787.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, BEING A CIRCULAR CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1596.42 FEET CONCAVE TO THE WEST, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 13 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST, 773.94 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, SAID POINT BEARING NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, 719.99 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, BEING A CIRCULAR CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1596.42 FEET CONCAVE TO THE WEST, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST, 205.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 45 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 88.42 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE CHICAGO-GALENA ROAD; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST, 41.71 FEET TO AN EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 152 AT PAGE 392; THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 39 3 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 267.87 FEET TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 9.74 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE NORTH 27 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 366.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 756.55 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING FROM SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 02 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, 581.48 FEET TO A POINT OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, 22.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 AND THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON ROD MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREE 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1,550.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST 409.15 FEET PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 221.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST 115.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST 196.55 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 1,336.52 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST 600.81 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF GALENA ROAD AS NOW ESTABLISHED; THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 677.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 348.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST 599.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST 750.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 3: THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER 642.93 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 162.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 102 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WITH THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, MEASURED CLOCKWISE THEREFROM, 100.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 169.50 FEET, AS MEASURED PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE SOUTHERLY OF SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE, 14.66 FEET TO THE PRESENT CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD AS DEPICTED ON A PLAT RECORDED JUNE 5, 1964 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 145193; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PRESENT CENTER LINE, 1675.69 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PRESENT CENTER LINE BEING ALONG A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 42,975.00 FEET, 933.19 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG SAID PRESENT CENTER LINE, 64.12 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 957.16 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5, 920.88 FEET TO A POINT 4 WHICH IS 2,316.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE EASTERLY, 2,651.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF WHICH IS 2,326.70 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF, 2,686.96 FEET TO SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE, 101.94 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. OWNER: Dale L. Konicek, LLC TRACT 1: THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 5 AND THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 4, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON PIPE MONUMENT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREE 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1730.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 362.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST 2025.23 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT 73-2720; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 1,222.89 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 577.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 49 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 298.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST 15.64 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257; (THE NEXT 5 CALLS ARE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257) THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 170.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 1,000.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 36.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 925.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 2: THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST, LYING NORTHERLY OF A LINE EXTENDING EASTERLY FROM A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 2316 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION, 2326.7 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY LINE PURSUANT TO DOCUMENT 73-2720, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ALSO; THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTH ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 2460.05 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE MOST SOUTHERLY LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED JULY 15, 1966 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 35339, BY A DEED DATED JANUARY 31, 1972 AND RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1972 AS DOCUMENT 72-467 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PROPERTY CONVEYED TO LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST 5 NUMBER 35339, WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 27 SECONDS TO THE LEFT WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 812.66 FEET, THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 49 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 366.94 FEET, THENCE EASTERLY 88 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 04 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 809.73 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 378.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ALSO; THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTH ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 2474.60 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED, THENCE WESTERLY ON A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 19 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 812.66 FEET, THENCE NORTH ALONG A LINE 89 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 03 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1.61 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE MOST SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED JULY 15, 1966 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 35339 BY DEED DATED JANUARY 31, 1972 AND RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1972 AS DOCUMENT 72-467, THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, A DISTANCE OF 812.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID EAST LINE, 13.55 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 3: LOT 2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 5 (EXCEPT THAT PART DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE WEST 40 CHAINS TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT, THENCE NORTH 38 1/2 LINKS TO THE SOUTH BANK OF DITCH, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 40 CHAINS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, 1961.60 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 667.0 FEET, THENCE SOUTH AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID NORTH LINE, 396.0 FEET, THENCE WEST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 667.0 FEET, THENCE NORTH AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 396.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 5 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE WEST 40 CHAINS (RECORD), 2652.01 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE NORTH 38 1/2 LINKS (RECORD), 25.41 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTH BANK OF A DITCH, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST (RECORD), NORTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST (MEASURED), 2593.76 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST, 232.55 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 68.93 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 6 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 59 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 68.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 265.04 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST, 57.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING) IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 4: THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 4, LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 265.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 531.35 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 27 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 509.62 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST 150.53 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST, PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 110.00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 912.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SAID POINT BEING 364.44 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4 (AS MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH LINE) AND SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF TERMINUS, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 5: PARCEL 1: THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 4, PART OF SECTION 5, PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD AS NOW ESTABLISHED ACROSS SAID SECTION 5 WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 2673.13 FEET TO A POINT 2327.34 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST 1323.10 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 2325.56 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1319.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 1828.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES EAST 3596.80 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 781.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 300.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 40 MINUTES EAST 291.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST 240.28 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 01 SECONDS EAST 1428.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 991.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST 1745.17 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 1373.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 600.81 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID GALENA ROAD; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 44 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID 7 CENTER LINE, 3318.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN LYING SOUTH OF A LINE EXTENDING EASTERLY FROM A POINT ON SAID WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 WHICH POINT IS 1876.07 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5 TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 5 WHICH POINT IS 1828.85 FEET SOUTH OF SAID NORTH QUARTER CORNER, AND EXCEPT A STRIP OF LAND 205.00 FEET WIDE IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 AND THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1828.85 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 10, 1967, KNOWN AS TRUST NO. 35913 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 154368 IN BOOK 152, PAGE 392 AS SAID NORTH LINE IS MONUMENTED AND OCCUPIED, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS LINE "B", FOR THE POINT OR BEGINNING; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID LINE "B", A DISTANCE OF 3596.80 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF ROB ROY DITCH FORMING AN ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 57 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 205.00 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 205.00 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANT SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE AFORESAID LINE "B"; THENCE WEST ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 3598.47 FEET TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE 205.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND ALSO EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID SECTION 4 LYING EAST OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. AND ALSO EXCEPTING: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 AND THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON ROD MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE 1,550.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST 409.15 FEET PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 221.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST 115.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST 196.55 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 1336.52 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST 600.81 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF GALENA ROAD AS NOW ESTABLISHED; THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 677.76 FEET, THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 348.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST 599.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST 750.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AND ALSO EXCEPTING, THAT PART CONVEYED BY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 30, 2007 AS DOCUMENT 200700026496, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 5 AND THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 4, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON PIPE MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 8 SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1730.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 362.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST 2026.23 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT 73-2720; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 1,222.89 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 577.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 298.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST 15.64 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257; (THE NEXT 5 CALLS ARE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257) THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 170.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST, 1,000.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 38.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 925.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 AND NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SECTION LINE 1331.4 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 00 SECONDS MEASURED FROM WEST TO SOUTH FROM THE SECTION LINE, 2321.5 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, MEASURED FROM NORTH TO WEST FROM THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 1328.7 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE SECTION LINE, FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 00 SECONDS MEASURED FROM EAST TO SOUTH FROM THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 146.4 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, MEASURED FROM NORTH TO WEST FROM THE SECTION LINE, 1553 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, MEASURED FROM EAST TO NORTH FROM THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 2461.1 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 6; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1534 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, LYING SOUTH AND WEST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT 1876.07 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY BY DOCUMENT NO. R73-2841 (TRACT 1); THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1133.17 TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 415.0 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANT EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO EARL P. AND EMMA V. KONICEK BY DEED RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 136414 IN BOOK 126, PAGE 41; THENCE NORTH ON SAID PARALLEL LINE, ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO SAID COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY BY DOCUMENT NO. R73-2841, 1897.19 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6 AND THE POINT OF TERMINATION; AND ALSO EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE 9 EXTENDED EASTERLY FROM A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 WHICH POINT IS 1876.07 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5 TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SECTION 5, WHICH POINT IS 1828.85 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5, ALL IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 6: PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 6; TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 3407.85 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO SUSAN SCHMIDT BY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 1929 IN BOOK 80, PAGES 334 AND 335; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO SUSAN SCHMIDT A DISTANCE OF 1552.74 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO EARL P KONICEK AND WIFE BY WARRANTY DEED DATED DECEMBER 4, 1961 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 136414, THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO EARL P. KONICEK AND WIFE 1240.82 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD, FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH ALONG THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE 919.13 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT WHICH IS 1312.43 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANCE NORTH OF SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 26 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 35 SECOND TO THE RIGHT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 332.08 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF PARCEL TWO OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 45553 BY CONSERVATORS DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1973 AS DOCUMENT 73-4671; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 62 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 01 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE 646.8 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF BEECHER ROAD; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 1362.40 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 460.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ALSO, THAT PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 70 DEGREES 55 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 276 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 8, 200 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 55 MINUTES EAST 270 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1456.6 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 470.51 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL TWO OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 45553 BY CONSERVATORS DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1973 AS DOCUMENT R73-4671; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 1006.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL TWO 388.83 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID NORTH LINE WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN PARCEL ONE OF SAID DOCUMENT 73-4671; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL ONE A DISTANCE OF 115.02 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL ONE WHICH IS 1112.06 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANCE NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE 26 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 38 SECOND 10 TO THE LEFT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 2329.35 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO DIANE R. KAPCHINSKI BY TRUSTEES DEED RECORDED JUNE 14, 1973 AS DOCUMENT 73-28243; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO DIANE R. KAPCHINSKI 812.68 FEET TO THE EAST LIEN OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, 1319.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, EXCEPT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION INCLUDED IN THE WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 24, 2020 AS DOCUMENT 202000016040. OWNER: The Konicek Family Limited Partnership A PART OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND PART OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE EAST 19.508 CHAINS (1,287.528 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE FOR PLACE OF BEGINNING, THENCE EAST ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, 44.599 CHAINS (2,943.534 FEET), THENCE SOUTH 16 MINUTES WEST 56.242 CHAINS (3,711.972 FEET) TO THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 58 MINUTES WEST 3.473 CHAINS (229.218 FEET) ALONG THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 37 MINUTES WEST 52.777 CHAINS (3,483.282 FEET) ALONG THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 16 MINUTES WEST 8.03 CHAINS (529.98 FEET) ALONG THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 05 MINUTES EAST 10.258 CHAINS (677.028 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 01 MINUTE WEST 6.632 CHAINS (437.712 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 27 DEGREES 51 MINUTES EAST 11.60 CHAINS (765.6 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES EAST 11.535 CHAINS (761.31 FEET) TO THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 12 DEGREES 40 MINUTES EAST TO THE PLACE OF THE BEGINNING, SITUATED IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, EXCEPTING THEREFROM RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED FOR ASHE ROAD AND GALENA ROAD AND ALSO; EXCEPTING, THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 19.508 CHAINS (1287.53 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 40 MINUTES WEST, 22.655 CHAINS (1495.23 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES WEST, 11.535 CHAINS (761.31 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST, 765.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 DEGREES 01 MINUTES EAST, 437.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 05 MINUTES WEST, 637.63 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GALENA ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 77 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GALENA ROAD, 187.93 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 77 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE 136.30 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING EASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 14,285.00 FEET AND CHORD BEARING SOUTH 78 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST, 189.98 FEET TO A POINT OF BEND IN SAID RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 14 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 51 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, 20.02 FEET TO A POINT OF BEND; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 14,265.00 FEET AND CHORD BEARING SOUTH 79 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 453.85 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENT; THENCE SOUTH 80 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 38 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, 29.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST, 528.48 11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST, 810.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, 541.53 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ALSO EXCEPTING, THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING DESCRIBED BY COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 19.508 CHAINS (1287.53 FEET) TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EQUESTRIAN ESTATES AT LEGACY FARMS; THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 40 MINUTES WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND SAID EAST LINE EXTENDED SOUTHERLY, 22.655 CHAINS (1495.23 FEET); THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES EAST, 29.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ASHE ROAD AS RELOCATED FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 618.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 35 MINUTES EAST, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 355.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES EAST, A DISTANCE OF 683.60 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ASHE ROAD; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1482.39 FEET, WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 10 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, 360.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Section 14 Consents of Owners Galena & 47th, LLC 1 MPLIV10, LLC March ___, 2025 Ms. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Re: Authorization to file Applications for Annexation, Rezoning and a Planned Unit Development with United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Dear Ms. Barksdale-Noble: The undersigned (the “Owner”) holds title to that certain property located in Kendall County and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”). Pioneer Development, LLC (the “Contract Purchaser”) has executed a purchase and sale agreement for the Property. The Contract Purchaser intends to file applications with the United City of Yorkville (“City”) for (a) annexation of all or part of the Property; (b) a rezoning of the Property; (c) a planned unit development; and (d) such other relief and approvals as may be necessary in furtherance of the Contract Purchaser’s intended development of the Property. In connection with the Contract Purchaser’s applications, the Owner hereby consents to the Contract Purchaser, and any affiliated or authorized entity or entities (including, without limitation, legal counsel), to: (xx) file such applications; (yy) pursue approval of said applications; and (zz) take any and all related actions which may be necessary or appropriate in connection with processing such applications. Owner provides this consent on the condition that any change to the Property approved by the City as a result of an application filed by Contract Purchaser will not be effective until the closing on the purchase of the Property by Contract Purchaser. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions regarding the foregoing consent, please contact the undersigned. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 11 Galena & 47th, LLC 3 MPLIV10, LLC EXHIBIT A PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDRESS: 170 acres Yorkville, IL PINs: 02-05-300-003 02-04-300-032 02-05-400-021 02-04-300-024 02-09-100-031 02-09-100-030 PARCEL 1: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGR EE 19 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 990.0 FEET (15 CH.) TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 19 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 1.84 FEET TO A POIN T ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 152 AT PAGE 392; THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 56 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 1722.34 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT 907257 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 128.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 19 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 10.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 787.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, BEING A CIRCULAR CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1596.42 FEET CONCAVE TO THE WEST, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 13 DEGREES 43 M INUTES 37 SECONDS WEST, 773.94 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, SAID POINT BEARING NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, 719.99 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHE RLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, BEING A CIRCULAR CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1596.42 FEET CONCAVE TO THE WEST, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST, 205.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 45 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 88.42 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE CHICAGO-GALENA ROAD; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST, 41.71 FEET TO AN EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 152 AT PAGE 392; THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 39 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 267.87 FEET TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 9.74 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE Galena & 47th, LLC 4 MPLIV10, LLC NORTH 27 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 366.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 756.55 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING FROM SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 02 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, 581.48 FEET TO A POINT OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, 22.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 AND THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, D ESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON ROD MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREE 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1,550.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST 409.15 FEET PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 221.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST 115.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST 196.55 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 1,336.52 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST 600.81 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE O F GALENA ROAD AS NOW ESTABLISHED; THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 677.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 348.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST 599.13 FEET; THENCE N ORTH 28 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST 750.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 3: THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER 642.93 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 162.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 102 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WITH THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, MEASURED CLOCKWISE THEREF ROM, 100.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 169.50 FEET, AS MEASURED PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE SOUTHERLY OF SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE, 14.66 FEET TO THE PRESENT CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD AS DEPICTED ON A PLAT RECORDED JUNE 5, 1964 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 145193; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID Galena & 47th, LLC 5 MPLIV10, LLC PRESENT CENTER LINE, 1675.69 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PRESENT CENTER LINE BEING ALONG A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 42,975.00 FEET, 933.19 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG SAID PRESENT CENTER LINE, 64.12 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 957.16 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5, 920.88 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 2,316.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE EASTERLY, 2,651.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF WHICH IS 2,326.70 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF, 2,686.96 FEET TO SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE, 101.94 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Section 15 Contiguous Owners CERTIFIED MAILING AFFIDAVIT STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS COUNTY OF KENDALL ) I/We, ________________________, petitioner, being first duly sworn, do hereby state under oath that to the best of my knowledge the attached list is a true, correct and complete list of all permanent parcel numbers, and names and addresses of owners, of all lots and parts of lots located within 500 feet (exclusively of any public streets and alleys) of the property legally described on the attached application for annexation, rezoning, special use permit, planned unit development, variation, or other zoning amendment. I further state that said list was obtained from the current tax rolls of the Kendall County Treasurer’s Office. I further state that I mailed by U.S. Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, a copy of the Public Notice of Public Hearing before the United City of Yorkville Planning and Zoning Commission for the Public Hearing held on Wednesday, _______________, at the United City of City Council Chambers, Yorkville, Illinois. The notice was mailed to the attached list of all of the permanent parcel numbers and names and addresses of owners at the U.S. Post office on _______________________, 20_____. ________________________________ Signature of Petitioner(s) Subscribed and sworn to before me this ________ day of _______________, 20______ ______________________________________ Notary Public BRISTOL BAY TOWNHOME ASSOC ADVOCATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY 2272 95TH ST STE 313 NAPERVILLE IL 60564 LUCILLE KANDLER 4553 C GARRITANO ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 MOORE ANNA C LANDOVITZ KEITH S 275 ASHE RD PLANO IL 60545 BRISTOL VENTURES LLC 10318 GALENA RD BRISTOL IL 60512 ROSENWINKEL FAMILY TRUST ET AL 501 JOHN ROSENWINKEL 10735 CHICAGO RD WATERMAN IL 60556 FAYE MAJOLA 4593 C GARRITANO CT YORKVILLE IL 60560 RYAN C EMILY M ANDERSON 2986 STIRLING CT MONTGOMERY IL 60538 ROSENWINKEL FAMILY TRUST ET AL 501 JOHN ROSENWINKEL 10735 CHICAGO RD WATERMAN IL 60556 BRISTOL BAY CONDO ASSOC ADVOCATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY 2272 95TH ST STE 313 NAPERVILLE IL 60564 DANIEL A CHARENE S NAGEL LIV TRUST PO BOX 1069 SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 CORDERO REAL ESTATE LLC 1079 SARD AVE MONTGOMERY IL 60538 KONICEK DALE L LLC 6321 WALKER RD YORKVILLE IL 60560 JOSE RAMOS GUILLERMINA MALDONADO 385 GRAPE VINE TRL OSWEGO IL 60543 LAWRENCE D JR DEBORAH H WICKTER REV TRUST 17M ASHE RD SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 BRADLEY MEGAN SUMMERS 4573 C GARRITANO ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 KONICEK ANGELA M DEC OF TRUST KONICEK MICHAEL A DEC OF TRUST 11843 GALENA RD PLANO IL 60545 KONICEK FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11843 GALENA RD PLANO IL 60545 KONICEK DALE L LLC 6321 WALKER RD YORKVILLE IL 60560 MARQUETTE COMPANIES GALENA 47 LLC 135 WATER ST 4TH FLR NAPERVILLE IL 60540 HERNANDEZ LOUIS BUCHNER AUDREY 4587 C GARRITANO ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 OKEEFE FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP 1624 HOBBS DR STE 1 DELAVAN WI 53115 BRYAN HOLDINGS LLC P O BOX 998 AURORA IL 60507 AVINASH B SHARON A FERNANDES 4561 GARRITANO ST UNIT C YORKVILLE IL 60560 BRISTOL BAY TOWNHOME ASSOC ADVOCATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY 2272 95TH ST STE 313 NAPERVILLE IL 60564 COMMONWEALTH EDISON THREE LINCOLN CENTRE 4TH FL OAK BROOK TERRACE IL 60181 TERI S DAVID THOMPSON 761 CYNTHIA DR SANDWICH IL 60548 KONICEK DALE L LLC 6321 WALKER RD YORKVILLE IL 60560 SPEEDWAY LLC 539 S MAIN ST FINDLAY OH 45840 MARK S MICHELLE M BOSSONG TRUST 17L ASHE RD SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 GALENA 47 LLC 135 WATER ST 4TH FLOOR NAPERVILLE IL 60540 BRISTOL VENTURES LLC 10318 GALENA RD BRISTOL IL 60512 DALE L KONICEK LLC 6321 WALKER RD YORKVILLE IL 60560 TARA KING CANO 4593 B GARRITANO ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 SKYFALL EQUESTRIAN LLC 17 J ASHE RD SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 ASHLEY M OLSEN 4567 GARRITANO ST UNIT C YORKVILLE IL 60560 PLANO 12127 B GALENA RD LLC ABIATHAR MGMT LLC PLANO 12127 B GALENA RD LLC 1550 E BELTLINE AVE SE STE 150 GRAND RAPIDS MI 49506 LEGACY FARM ESTATES LLC 8 HATHAWAY CRESCENT AURORA IL 60506 MOORE ANNA C LANDOVITZ KEITH S 275 ASHE RD PLANO IL 60545 MOORE ANNA C LANDOVITZ KEITH S 275 ASHE RD PLANO IL 60545 DALE L KONICEK LLC 6321 WALKER RD YORKVILLE IL 60560 KONICEK DALE L LLC 6321 WALKER RD YORKVILLE IL 60560 TWO STAR ENTERPRISES LLC 695 RTE 34 AURORA IL 60503 TORO MARILEX A CEJA VICTOR E TORO 10292 GALENA RD BRISTOL IL 60512 KONICEK FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11843 GALENA RD PLANO IL 60545 GUPTA SANJAY GUPTA SAMEER 3N982 WALT WHITMAN RD SAINT CHARLES IL 60175 LAND AT LEGACY ESTATES LLC 17 ASHE RD LOT J SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 KONICEK DALE L LLC 6321 WALKER RD YORKVILLE IL 60560 TEQUILLA SUNRISE ENTERPRISES LLC 1107 S BRIDGE ST STE D YORKVILLE IL 60560 MARQUETTE COMPANIES MPLIV10 LLC 135 WATER ST NAPERVILLE IL 60540 CHICAGO WB INVESTORS LLC c/o SAM ZABALA 315 FLATBUSH AVE 302 BROOKLYN NY 11217 MARQUETTE COMPANIES GALENA 47 LLC 135 WATER ST 4TH FLR NAPERVILLE IL 60540 MARQUETTE COMPANIES GALENA 47 LLC 135 WATER ST 4TH FLR NAPERVILLE IL 60540 SKYFALL EQUESTRIAN LLC 17 J ASHE RD SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 EDWARD A BARBARA SCHRAMM N5119 HWY H DEERBROOK WI 54424 GALENA 47 LLC 175 SOUTH HIGHPOINT DRIVE ROMEOVILLE IL 60446 KONICEK FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11843 GALENA RD PLANO, IL, 60545 STOREHOUSE PROPERTIES LLC 238 BRIARHEATH LN NAPERVILLE IL 60565 BRISTOL BAY TOWNHOME ASSOC ADVOCATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY 2272 95TH ST STE 313 NAPERVILLE IL 60564 BRISTOL BAY TOWNHOME ASSOC ADVOCATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY 2272 95TH ST STE 313 NAPERVILLE IL 60564 JAMES S PAMELA A SECOR 10724 GALENA RD BRISTOL IL 60512 DANIEL A CHARENE S NAGEL LIV TRUST PO BOX 1069 SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 CHARLES D III LAURA M KASPER 17 P ASHE RD SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 LATHAM-SCHLEINING TAMMI M SCHLEINING JOSHUA A 790 ELDAMAIN RD PLANO IL 60545 LENNYS GAS N WASH YORKVILLE LLC 8200 W 185TH ST UNIT K TINLEY PARK IL 60487 EDWARD A BARBARA SCHRAMM N5119 HWY H DEERBROOK WI 54424 BRISTOL BAY CONDOMINIUM ASSOC BRISTOL BAY COMMUNITIES 4582 ROSENWINKEL ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 GILDARDO E RITA J RIOS 11018 GALENA RD BRISTOL IL 60512 STATE OF IL DEPT OF TRANS 700 E NORRIS DR OTTAWA IL 61350 COMMONWEALTH EDISON THREE LINCOLN CENTRE 4TH FL OAK BROOK TERRACE IL 60181 GUPTA SANJAY GUPTA SAMEER 3N982 WALT WHITMAN RD SAINT CHARLES IL 60175 TWO STAR ENTERPRISES LLC 695 RTE 34 AURORA IL 60503 MOORE ANNA C LANDOVITZ KEITH S 275 ASHE RD PLANO IL 60545 KONICEK DALE L LLC 6321 WALKER RD YORKVILLE IL 60560 ZAVALA CELIA DEL SAGRARIO RENTERIA GALINDO FORTINO 980 ELDAMAIN RD PLANO IL 60545 GEORGE JR OSTREKO ET AL 1410 E BEECHER RD BRISTOL IL 60512 JOHN F CYNTHIA K UNDESSER 10326 GALENA RD BRISTOL IL 60512 KONICEK DALE L LLC 6321 WALKER RD YORKVILLE IL 60560 NICKOLOS R LINDA MARIA STEFFAN 4581 D GARRITANO ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 PETER A CHERI L LO DESTRO TRUST 17A/17B ASHE RD SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 RICHARD A MARCIA I BRUMMEL 12340 FAXON RD PLANO IL 60545 BRISTOL VENTURES LLC 10318 GALENA RD BRISTOL IL 60512 LAND AT LEGACY ESTATES LLC 17 ASHE RD LOT J SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 %TAX DEPT SPEEDWAY LLC 539 S MAIN ST FINDLAY OH 45840 COMMONWEALTH EDISON THREE LINCOLN CENTRE 4TH FL OAK BROOK TERRACE IL 60181 YORKVILLE NEXUS III LLC ATTN MATTHEW B GILBERT 837 W JUNIOR TERR CHICAGO IL 60613 COMMONWEALTH EDISON THREE LINCOLN CENTRE 4TH FL OAK BROOK TERRACE IL 60181 CASTLE BANK TRUST 10735 CHICAGO RD WATERMAN IL 60556 LAND AT LEGACY ESTATES LLC 17 ASHE RD LOT J SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 %THOMAS POWELL SR CHICAGO TRUST COMPANY NA 12127 W EDGEWOOD DR HOMER GLEN IL 60491 TRIPLE S LAND LLC KENDALL COUNTY CONCRETE INC 695 ROUTE 34 AURORA IL 60504 ILLINOIS DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION ATTN BUREAU OF LAND AQUISITION 201 CENTER CT SCHAUMBURG IL 60196 DALE L KONICEK LLC 6321 WALKER RD YORKVILLE IL 60560 JOHN F CYNTHIA K UNDESSER 10326 GALENA RD BRISTOL IL 60512 COMMONWEALTH EDISON THREE LINCOLN CENTRE 4TH FL OAK BROOK TERRACE IL 60181 BRISTOL VENTURES LLC 10318 GALENA RD BRISTOL IL 60512 JOHANA A BARRIOS 4561 D GARRITANO ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 BRISTOL BAY TOWNHOME ASSOC ADVOCATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY 2272 95TH ST STE 313 NAPERVILLE IL 60564 BRISTOL BAY TOWNHOME ASSOC ADVOCATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY 2272 95TH ST STE 313 NAPERVILLE IL 60564 DAVID S LINDA K GLETTY 320 N OAK ST WATERMAN IL 60556 JPSHANNON LLC JOHN P BRYAN PO BOX 998 AURORA IL 60507 BRISTOL BAY TOWNHOME ASSOC ADVOCATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY 2272 95TH ST STE 313 NAPERVILLE IL 60564 BRISTOL BAY TOWNHOME ASSOC ADVOCATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY 2272 95TH ST STE 313 NAPERVILLE IL 60564 JEFF MILROY MILROY FARMS LLC 287 WOODSTOCK AVE GLEN ELLYN IL 60137 CASTLE BANK TRUST 10735 CHICAGO RD WATERMAN IL 60556 null DARREN R SPACAL 4573 D GARRITANO ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 DONALD CAROL FIVE H LLC HAMMAN 13351 B FAXON RD PLANO IL 60545 KENNETH A HART 4547 GARRITANO ST UNIT C YORKVILLE IL 60560 %TAX DEPT SPEEDWAY LLC 539 S MAIN ST FINDLAY OH 45840 GEORGE JR OSTREKO ET AL 1410 E BEECHER RD BRISTOL IL 60512 STEPHANIE JOHNSON 4547 GARRITANO UNIT D YORKVILLE IL 60560 GUS ALINA S ARGIRES 4587 D GARRITANO ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 PHILLIP SCHINKOETH 4553 D GARRITANO ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 HOWARTH ANGELA GRAY WHEELER JUSTIN EDWARD 4567 D GARRITANO ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 URUETA MARIA MACDALENA ROSALES CAROLINA CITLALI 10346 GALENA RD BRISTOL IL 60512 HAMSMITH HARRY KULAKOWSKI ANDREW KELLY 10326 GALENA RD BRISTOL IL 60512 LAND AT LEGACY ESTATES LLC 17 ASHE RD LOT J SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 JENNIFER L RAKAS 10094 BASELINE RD SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 JAMES M SEARS ET AL 27 N COOK ST PLANO IL 60545 COUNTY OF KENDALL CORNER OF BRIDGE GALENA RD 111 W FOX ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 COMMONWEALTH EDISON THREE LINCOLN CENTRE 4TH FL OAK BROOK TERRACE IL 60181 BRISTOL VENTURES LLC 10318 GALENA RD BRISTOL IL 60512 PNC BANK NA CAPSTONE RESDEV LLC ATTN 942000164 P O BOX 25999 SHAWNEE MISSION KS 66225 COMMONWEALTH EDISON THREE LINCOLN CENTRE 4TH FL OAK BROOK TERRACE IL 60181 MARY AUER 1327 W BEECHER RD BRISTOL IL 60512 THOMAS H III EUGENIA H CROSS 11 PARTRIDGE SQUARE OSWEGO IL 60543 DALE L KONICEK LLC 6321 WALKER RD YORKVILLE IL 60560 SPEEDWAY LLC 539 S MAIN ST FINDLAY OH 45840 EDWARD A BARBARA SCHRAMM N5119 HWY H DEERBROOK WI 54424 BRYAN HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 998 AURORA IL 60507 RONALDO B COLOMA 12900 ALPINE WAY PLAINFIELD IL 60585 COMMONWEALTH EDISON THREE LINCOLN CENTRE 4TH FL OAK BROOK TERRACE IL 60181 GREGORY PENSON 4581 B GARRITANO ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 LAND AT LEGACY ESTATES LLC 17 ASHE RD LOT J SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 651 PRAIRIE POINTE DR YORKVILLE IL 60560 COMMONWEALTH EDISON THREE LINCOLN CENTRE 4TH FL OAK BROOK TERRACE IL 60181 JERRY G MARILEE FOLTZ 1010 W BEECHER RD BRISTOL IL 60512 KONICEK FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 11843 GALENA RD PLANO IL 60545 KONICEK DALE L LLC 6321 WALKER RD YORKVILLE IL 60560 LAND AT LEGACY ESTATES LLC 17 ASHE RD LOT J SUGAR GROVE IL 60554 LATHAM-SCHLEINING TAMMI M SCHLEINING JOSHUA A 790 ELDAMAIN RD PLANO IL 60545 KONICEK DALE L LLC 6321 WALKER RD YORKVILLE IL 60560 Section 16 Public Hearing Sign Application APPLICATION FOR PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us DATE:PZC NUMBER:DEVELOPMENT NAME: PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME:COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP:TELEPHONE: BUSINESS HOME EMAIL:FAX: PROPERTY INFORMATION NAME OF HOLDER OF LEGAL TITLE: IF LEGAL TITLE IS HELD BY A LAND TRUST, LIST THE NAMES OF ALL HOLDERS OF ANY BENEFICIAL INTEREST THEREIN: PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS: TYPE OF REQUEST: PRELIMINARY PLAN AMENDED PREMILINARY PLAN TOTAL LOT ACREAGE:CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION: ATTACHMENTS Petitioner must attach a legal description of the property to this application and title it as “Exhibit A”. (847) 738-5005 APPLICATION FOR PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us ATTORNEY INFORMATION NAME:COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP:TELEPHONE: EMAIL:FAX: ENGINEER INFORMATION NAME:COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP:TELEPHONE: EMAIL:FAX: LAND PLANNER/SURVEYOR INFORMATION NAME:COMPANY: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP:TELEPHONE: EMAIL:FAX: AGREEMENT I VERIFY THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IN THIS APPLICATION IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I UNDERSTAND AND ACCEPT ALL REQUIREMENTS AND FEES AS OUTLINED AS WELL AS ANY INCURRED ADMINISTRATIVE AND PLANNING CONSULTANT FEES WHICH MUST BE CURRENT BEFORE THIS PROJECT CAN PROCEED TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED COMMITTEE MEETING. I UNDERSTAND ALL OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND UNDERSTAND THAT IF AN APPLICATION BECOMES DORMANT IT IS THROUGH MY OWN FAULT AND I MUST THEREFORE FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED ABOVE. OWNER HEREBY AUTHORIZES THE PETITIONER TO PURSUE THE APPROPRIATE ENTITLEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY. PETITIONER SIGNATURE OWNER SIGNATURE DATE DATE THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED PLEASE NOTARIZE HERE: PERMIT NUMBER:DATE/TIME RECEIVED: SITE ADDRESS:PARCEL NUMBER: SUBDIVISION:LOT/UNIT: APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME:TELEPHONE: HOME BUSINESS ADDRESS:E-MAIL: HOME BUSINESS CITY, STATE, ZIP:FAX: SIGN INFORMATION DATE OF PICK UP:NUMBER OF SIGNS: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:SIGN RETURN DATE: The undersigned hereby states that they have acquired Public Hearing Signs from the United City of Yorkville’s Community Development Department and agrees to return said sign/s to Yorkville City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, immediately following the date of the public hearing. Petitioner or Representative agrees to pay to the United City of Yorkville a deposit of $50 for each sign. The deposit will be returned to the petitioner when the public hearing sign/s have been returned to the City. Petitioner or Representative further agrees to pay to the United City of Yorkville the full amount of the purchase price for each sign not returned to the United City of Yorkville within seven (7) days after the date of the public hearing. ___________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________ SIGNATURE/AUTHORIZED AGENT DATE DATE RETURNED: _____________________________________________________ RECEIVED BY: _______________________________________________________PZC# ______________________________ APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING SIGN United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us Section 17 Fee Schedule APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us INVOICE & WORKSHEET PETITION APPLICATION CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW Engineering Plan Review deposit $500.00 Total: $ AMENDMENT Annexation Plan Plat P.U.D. $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 Total: $ ANNEXATION $250.00 + $10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres Total: $ ____________ - 5 = ____________ x $10 = ____________ + $250 = $ ____________ # of Acres Acres over 5 Amount for Extra Acres Total Amount REZONING $200.00 + $10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres Total: $ If annexing and rezoning, charge only 1 per acre fee; if rezoning to a PUD, charge PUD Development Fee - not Rezoning Fee ____________ - 5 = ____________ x $10 = ____________ + $200 = $ ____________ # of Acres Acres over 5 Amount for Extra Acres Total Amount SPECIAL USE $250.00 + $10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres Total: $ ____________ - 5 = ____________ x $10 = ____________ + $250 = $ ____________ # of Acres Acres over 5 Amount for Extra Acres Total Amount ZONING VARIANCE $85.00 + $500.00 outside consultants deposit Total: $ PRELIMINARY PLAN FEE $500.00 Total: $ PUD FEE $500.00 Total: $ FINAL PLAT FEE $500.00 Total: $ ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW DEPOSIT Less than 1 acre Over 1 acre, less than 10 acres Over 10 acres, less than 40 acres Over 40 acres, less than 100 acres Over 100 acres $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $25,000.00 Total: $ OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS DEPOSIT Legal, land planner, zoning coordinator, environmental services Total: $ For Annexation, Subdivision, Rezoning, and Special Use: Less than 2 acres Over 2 acres, less than 10 acres Over 10 acres $1,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE: Section 18 Acknowledgement of Financial Responsibility GarritanoSt Brist o l BayDr US Route30Baseline Rd Be r tra m D r NBridgeStGalenaRdAs h e R d E Beecher RdW Beecher RdEldamain Rd653 650 651 648 649 652 651 652 648 649 650 653 Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 (630) 466-6700 PROJECT CARDINALFLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT www.eeiweb.com DATE DATE: PROJECT NO.: FILE: PATH: BY: MARCH 2025 YO2451 YO2451_Project_Cardinal_Floodplain.mxd H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2024\ PGW2 NO.REVISIONS ³United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 630-553-4350www.yorkville.il.us 600 0300 Feet Legend RobRoyFIS_BFElines Zone AE Floodplain Floodway Soundscape Engineering 3711 N. Ravenswood Ave., Ste. 104 • Chicago, IL 60613 • (312) 436-0032 729 W. Ann Arbor Trl., Ste. 150 • Plymouth, MI 48170 • (734) 418-8663 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com MEMORANDUM April 7, 2025 To: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director, United City of Yorkville, knoble@yorkville.il.us From: Aimee Lalime, INCE Bd. Cert. Nathan Sevener, INCE Bd. Cert. Re: Project Cardinal Proposed Data Center Campus and On-site Substations Development Preliminary Comments on Potential Noise Transmission to the Community Per Soundscape Engineering’s consulting services contract with the United City of Yorkville, we are providing the following preliminary comments regarding potential noise transmission from the proposed development of a data center campus with on-site substations to the surrounding community. At this time, there is insufficient Project information available to allow calculation of noise transmission from the proposed Development to the surrounding community. However, based on our experience, review of the Preliminary PUD Plan dated 3/14/25, and the uses of the properties near the proposed site, we can provide the following comments for your consideration. 1. Chapter 4 of the Yorkville Code of Ordinances restricts noise transmission to both residential and commercial land uses. The limit on sound transmission to residential land uses during the nighttime is the most restrictive (50 dBA). Since the proposed Data Center Campus can be expected to operate during both daytime and nighttime, nighttime sound level limits will need to be considered when evaluating noise transmission from the proposed Data Center Campus. 2. In our experience, the primary noise sources associated with Data Centers are the electrical power generators and the cooling equipment. 3. The Applicant should note, in particular, that the Noise Ordinance includes a 10 dB sound level limit penalty for noise that is tonal in character. Some types of cooling equipment, such as chillers, can emit tonal noise. 4. There is a large residential development within Yorkville limits (Bristol Bay condos) located approximately 1300 ft east of the closest building on the proposed Project Cardinal Campus; 900 feet of this distance is a setback within the proposed project site. For properties at this distance, it may be difficult for the Data Center Campus to comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance. 5. The closest residential land use within the City of Yorkville is 800 feet south of the proposed data center property line at 10346 Galena Road. With concerted effort, it might be possible for the Data Center Campus to comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance. This location is of particular concern to us due to its proximity to the proposed development. Project Cardinal Data Center – Preliminary Comments April 7, 2025 SE No. 2312 Page 2 of 2 Soundscape Engineering 3711 N. Ravenswood Ave., Ste. 104 • Chicago, IL 60613 • (312) 436-0032 729 W. Ann Arbor Trl., Ste. 150 • Plymouth, MI 48170 • (734) 418-8663 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com 6. Based on our noise control engineering experience and review of similar-sized data center campuses, the project will need to consider noise control early in the design, using thoughtful site planning, locating cooling equipment and generators as far as possible from residents, and selecting low-noise equipment. Since the nighttime ordinance is more stringent, it may be necessary for some of the equipment to be programmed to operate at quieter, but less efficient, operating modes during nighttime hours. In addition to equipment selection, load settings, and siting, meeting the noise ordinance may also require noise control screening, compressor wraps, or other approaches for the outdoor cooling equipment. Noise control enclosures and mufflers will most likely be needed for the generators. 7. The Applicant should provide a noise impact assessment report for review by the City. The report should describe how the assessment was performed, list the specific noise-generating equipment associated with operation of the Data Center Campus and On-site Substation, describe any noise control approaches and equipment that will be included in the project design, and confirm that the City’s noise ordinance will be met. Noise source data for the cooling equipment shall be based on actual sound level measurements of the specific equipment planned for the project, made in accordance with nationally recognized standards, not on interpolated, extrapolated, or otherwise calculated sound levels. 8. The City should consider whether it wishes to require the applicant to perform post-construction acoustic testing to demonstrate compliance with the noise ordinance. 9. We understand that some members of the community are concerned about noise emissions from the planned data center campus. The community noise ordinance protects Yorkville residents by limiting noise transmission to residential land uses to 60 dBA during the day and 50 dBA at night. In addition, tonal noise sources are required to be 10 dBA below those values (50 dBA daytime and 40 dBA at night). For reference, the Route 47 traffic noise at the closest Bristol Bay condos (400’ from the roadway) is estimated to be as low as 55 dBA at night and as high as 63 dBA during the day. This suggests that residences located near busy roadways will not experience a significant impact from data center noise. 10. Our comments are only in relation to the City of Yorkville noise ordinance and do not consider compliance relative to any other jurisdictions, including Kendall County, Kane County, or the Illinois Pollution Control Board. 11. Similarly, our comments are focused on residential and commercial land uses that are currently within the City of Yorkville. There are, however, several single-family residences located very near the proposed development that are not currently within the City of Yorkville. These residences are located immediately across the road to the North, South, and West of the proposed Data Center Campus on Baseline, Galena, and Ashe Roads. **END OF MEMORANDUM** Soundscape Engineering 3711 N. Ravenswood Ave., Ste. 104 • Chicago, IL 60613 • (312) 436-0032 729 W. Ann Arbor Trl., Ste. 150 • Plymouth, MI 48170 • (734) 418-8663 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com MEMORANDUM April 21, 2025 To: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director, United City of Yorkville, knoble@yorkville.il.us From: Aimee Lalime, INCE Bd. Cert. Nathan Sevener, INCE Bd. Cert. Re: Project Cardinal Proposed Data Center Campus and On-site Substations Development Follow-Up to Acoustics Questions during April 10th Plan Council Meeting On April 10, 2025, the City of Yorkville hosted a pre-plan meeting and a Plan Council meeting to discuss the proposed Project Cardinal Data Center Campus and on-site substation development. Here are our follow-up comments and responses to acoustics-related questions: 1. Will residents near the data center be exposed to health risks due to data center noise? Studies have shown that noise-related stress can cause health risks, but the level of health risk is related to the amplitude of the noise. The city noise ordinance limits noise transmission to residential properties to 60 dBA during the daytime and 50 dBA at night, with these limits being 10 dB more stringent for tonal noise due to its potential for annoyance. These thresholds are consistent with American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard S12.9 and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, which are 50-60 dBA daytime and 45-50 dBA nighttime. The WHO guidelines, in particular, are based on extensive research in noise-related impacts, including health impacts and sleep disturbance. 2. There is a very nice equestrian center located West of the project site. How do horses respond to noise as compared to humans? After researching horses’ response to noise, we found that horses have a wider frequency range of hearing than humans and are likely to be startled by sudden noises due to their prey instinct. There is some evidence that, like humans, horses acclimate to steady or repetitive noises (such as aircraft flyovers or train passbys). Since noises associated with data centers are primarily continuous noises, rather than intermittent or sudden onset noises, we expect the horses will not be more sensitive than humans to this type of noise source. In addition, ANSI S12.9 recommends that noise transmissions to residential land uses be 5-15 dB quieter than riding stables, suggesting that humans are more sensitive to noise than horses. 3. How will the officers determine if the noise is tonal? The City of Yorkville uses Quest Technology Model 210 sound level meters, which do not have the capability needed to determine if a noise source is tonal. The officers would need new sound level meters with third-octave band measurement capability and training in analyzing measurements to determine if a sound is tonal. Project Cardinal Data Center – Plan Council Meeting Follow-up April 21, 2025 SE No. 2312 Page 2 of 2 Soundscape Engineering 3711 N. Ravenswood Ave., Ste. 104 • Chicago, IL 60613 • (312) 436-0032 729 W. Ann Arbor Trl., Ste. 150 • Plymouth, MI 48170 • (734) 418-8663 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com 4. A note regarding equipment placement: The best location for mechanical equipment is on the side of the building opposite the residents, with the rooftop behind sound barrier screens being the next best location. The worst location is on the side of the building closest to residents. It is not necessary to restrict the project from mounting equipment on the roof, as long as the project demonstrates that the ordinance is fully met. 5. Regarding operational conditions: As discussed in the plan council meeting, we recommend an update to item 30.ll.ii in the Plan Council Packet. Instead of requiring the operational noise levels to not exceed the pre-development baseline, we recommend requiring the project to meet the noise ordinance. **END OF MEMORANDUM** 1 I have reviewed the completed applications for Annexation, Rezone, Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Preliminary PUD Plan for Project Cardinal received March 21, 2025 as submitted by Pioneer Development, LLC, Petitioner, as well as conceptual Preliminary PUD site plan dated 03/14/25, exterior building elevations dated03/14/25, and Landscape Plan dated 03/11/25, all prepared by Burns McDonnell, Margulies Hoelzli Architecture and O2. A Traffic Methodology Memo, Preliminary Drainage Memo, and security fencing details dated March 14, 2025 prepared and/or submitted by Burns McDonnell, were also reviewed. The petitioner, as contract purchaser, along with property owners Sanjay and Sameer Gupta, Dale L. Konicek, LLC, and The Konicek Family Limited Partnership, is seeking approval for the annexation of seven (7) parcels totaling 305 acres. These parcels will be part of a larger 1,037-acre development consisting of 21 parcels in total planned for a state-of-the-art data center campus. The request also includes rezoning the area to the M-2 General Manufacturing District, special use authorization for a Planned Unit Development (PUD), and approval of a preliminary PUD Plan which involves the phased construction of fourteen (14) two-story data center buildings totaling over 17 million square feet, two (2) electrical substations, a utility switchyard, and associated stormwater detention basins. Each phase of development will include one data center building, with full campus buildout anticipated within 10 years. As part of the petitioner’s application for Planned Unit Development (PUD), there is a request for thirteen (13) deviations to the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) from the base M-2 General Manufacturing District standards related to bulk and dimensional regulations; energy industrial use requirements; cross access; minimum parking requirements; pedestrian circulation; bicycle parking; off-street loading space requirements; landscaping; screening of mechanical units; fencing; appearance standards; lots; street design improvements and connectivity requirements. Each of these requested deviations will be detailed separately in this review memo under subsequent headings. Based upon my review of the application documents and provided plans, I have compiled the following comments: GENERAL APPLICATION COMMENTS: 1. Staff has reviewed the list of property owners within 500 feet of the subject property prepared by the petitioner and submitted as part of the application and noted several parcels to the north (within Kane County) were not included. a. Attached is a list of the fourteen (14) parcels and property owners that will need to be added to your application and included in you public hearing certified mailing. It is the petitioner’s responsibility to verify the accuracy of the parcels and mailing addresses provided. GENERAL ANNEXATION COMMENTS: 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY - The subject property area for the proposed data center campus is comprised of seven (7) unincorporated parcels totaling 305-acrea and fourteen (14) currently incorporated parcels, totaling approximately 1,037 acres as broken down below: Memorandum To: Plan Council From: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Date: March 25, 2025 Subject: PZC 2025-08 Project Cardinal – Annex, Rezone, PUD & Prelim Plan SW Corner of Baseline Road & IL 47 west to Eldamain Road Proposed Data Center Campus and On-Site Substation Development 2 PIN ACRES OWNER JURISDICTION 02-05-300-003 136.73 Galena & 47TH LLC, MPLIV10 LLC CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-04-300-032 26.09 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-04-300-024 1.64 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-05-400-021 1.28 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-09-100-031 0.11 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-09-100-030 1.04 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-04-100-015 32.89 SANJAY & SAMEER GUPTA CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-05-200-007 0.34 UNINCORPORATED 02-06-100-022 233.79 THE KONICEK FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNINCORPORATED 02-06-200-002 48.60 DALE L. KONICEK, LLC CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-05-400-022 301.61 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-05-200-006 102.47 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-04-100-016 11.02 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-06-400-008 29.89 UNINCORPORATED 02-06-200-003 7.02 UNINCORPORATED 02-05-100-003 7.60 UNINCORPORATED 02-05-100-005 8.54 DALE L. KONICEK, LLC UNINCORPORATED 02-05-400-009 15.78 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-04-300-018 45.45 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-04-300-017 7.73 CITY OF YORKVILLE 02-06-400-001 17.79 UNINCORPORATED TOTAL 1037.41 3. MISSING PARCELS – It is noted there are two (2) residential parcels located on Baseline Road (#02-05-200-004 Maldonado and #02-05-200-001 Rakas). Is it the intention of the petitioner to purchase these parcels and incorporate in the overall data center campus plan? Does the petitioner plan to keep the cell tower located on parcel #02-05-200-004? 4. PLAT OF ANNEXATION – A plat of annexation shall be an exhibit to the annexing ordinance. The city engineer will prepare the exhibit. 5. EXISTING PUD DEVELOPMENTS – There are two (2) existing Annexation Agreements/Planned Unit Developments within the proposed subject area for the Project Cardinal data center campus. This includes the Bailey Meadows and Westhaven developments as described below: Development Location Acreage Entitlements Type of Units # of Units Bailey Meadows W of SW Corner of Baseline Rd. & Rte. 47 150 ac. Ord. 2004-40 Annexation Agreement (Expired 7/13/24) Res. 2006-43 Prelim. Plan Approval (Expired 7/13/07) Single Family 189 Townhomes 153 Westhaven NW Corner of Rt. 47 & Galena Rd. 586 ac. Ord. 2005-78 Annexation Agreement (Expires 9/27/25) Ord. 2006-132 Amend. Annex. & PUD Agreement Res. 2007-54 Prelim. Plan & Plat Approval (Expired 10/23/08) SF Age-Restricted 568 DU Age-Restricted 244 Single Family 484 TOTAL 736 ac. TOTAL 1638 3 a. The underlying zoning of the Bailey Meadows development is R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District, R-3 Multi-Family Attached Residence District, and B-3 General Business District. b. The underlying zoning of the Westhaven development is R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District, R-3 Multi-Family Attached Residence District, and B-3 General Business District. c. Both of these developments account for approximately 70% of the overall subject area, resulting in a “loss” of approximately 1,638 future dwelling units. It should also be noted, the Westhaven development still has an active Annexation Agreement. The approval of any subsequent planned unit development (PUD) agreement will effectively repeal or override these previous entitlements. GENERAL ZONING/REZONING COMMENTS: 6. SUBJECT PROPERTY ZONING – The petitioner is seeking to rezone all twenty-one (21) parcels within the subject area to M-2 General Manufacturing District. a. Per Section 10-3-4 of the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), any territory annexed to the city shall automatically be classified within the R-1 Single- Family Suburban Residential District. Therefore, the petitioner is seeking rezoning these seven (7) parcels to be annexed to the M-2 General Manufacturing District. b. The petitioner is also seeking to rezone the parcels within the Bailey Meadows and Westhaven developments from R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District, R- 3 Multi-Family Attached Residence District, and B-3 General Business District to M- 2 General Manufacturing District. 7. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING - The following are the current immediate surrounding zoning and land uses of the subject property: Zoning Land Use North F- Farming District (Kane County) Baseline Road (Rte. 30) Farmland Transportation Land Use East Planned Unit Development (R-2, R-3, R-4, B-3) B-3 General Business District R-3 Multi-Family Attached Residence District N. Bridge Street (Rte. 47) Farmland (Schramm) Farmland (Northgate Commercial) Bristol Bay Subdivision Transportation Land Use South A-1 Agricultural District (Kendall County) M-1 Manufacturing (Kendall County) R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District A-1 Agricultural District (Special Use) Galena Road Farmland Vacant Farmland Residential/Outbuilding Land Use Farmland (Yorkville Renewables Solar) Transportation Land Use West A-1 Agricultural District (Kendall County) RPD-1 (Kendall County) Ashe Road Farmland Residential/Equestrian Land Use Transportation Land Use 4 c. Petitioner has provided written responses to the Standards for Rezoning which will be entered into the record during the public hearing process. 8. PERMITTED USES – Per Table 10-3-12 (B) of the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), “data center” and “electric substation” are permitted land uses in the M-2 General Manufacturing District. Data centers are defined as Energy Industrial Uses per Table 10-3-12(B) in the Unified Development Ordinance. d. While no specific land use for a “utility switchyard” is identified within the Unified Development Ordinance, per Section 10-3-12 (A)(5), if a proposed use is not listed in the tables, the Zoning Administrator shall determine if the use is substantially similar to a use listed in the tables. If it is, the use shall be treated in the same manner as the substantially similar use. e. Since a “utility switchyard” is generally defined as “a type of substation that operates at a single voltage level without transformers,” staff considers a “utility switchyard” to be substantially similar to an electric substation and, therefore, a permitted use within the M-2 General Manufacturing District. f. It is also noted on the singular parcel (02-06-400-001) located south of Galena Road totaling 17.75 acres is proposed for six (6) “Future Water Tanks”. i. Private above-ground water tank storage is not identified specifically as a permitted or special use in the M-2 General Manufacturing District. Therefore, staff requests additional information regarding the intended use, operation, overall area, height, and proposed access to this site. Also, will this parcel be gated? This will allow staff determine if this use is substantially similar to other permitted or special uses for the district. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOMEMT (PUD) COMMENTS: 9. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – Section 10-8-8 of City’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) establishes standards for Planned Unit Development (PUDs). PUDs are allowed to modify standards of the base district as long as the requested modifications are specifically identified and demonstrates how each allowance is compatible with surrounding development, is necessary for proper development of the site, and is aligned with at least one (1) modification standard found in Section 10-8-8D of the UDO. g. The petitioner has identified three (3) modification standard the proposed PUD will meet per Section 10-8-8D. i. Modification Standard #1 “Landscape Conservation and Visual Enhancement”. The Planned Unit Development preserves and enhances existing landscape, trees, and natural features such as rivers, streams, ponds, groves, and landforms. 1. Staff believes this modification standard does not apply, as the subject property currently lacks any existing landscaping or trees, and no natural features have been identified for preservation. ii. Modification Standard #6 “High Quality Building Materials.” The Planned Unit Development utilizes time and weather tested building materials that are of a higher quality than what is otherwise required by this UDO. 5 1. Staff is uncertain if this modification standard applies, however, the petitioner states “ each building will feature architectural treatments that incorporate elements reminiscent of modern warehouse design...including advanced glazing, refined articulation, precast concrete walls, and metal elements.” iii. Modification Standard #11 “Funding or Construction of Public Roadways”. The Planned Unit Development includes the construction of roadways adjacent to the subject site as planned in the City of Yorkville Comprehensive Plan, Kendall County Long-Range Transportation Plan, or another transportation plan adopted by a local, County, or regional entity. 1. Staff believes this modification standard does apply, as the proposed development will be required to make roadway improvements to at least the intersection of Baseline Road (Rte. 30) and Ashe Road. iv. Modification Standard #12 “Regional Utility Improvements”. The Planned Unit Development involves the construction of a utility improvement identified in the City or Yorkville Comprehensive Plan or other policy document adopted by a local, County, or regional entity. 1. Staff believes this modification standard does apply, as the proposed development will be required to install large diameter public utilities (water and sanitary) to the property. h. The petitioner has provided written responses to the standards for special use and for Planned Unit Development (PUD) which will be entered into the record during the public hearing process. PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN COMMENTS: 10. PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL – Per Section 10-8-6. Subdivision Procedures of the Unified Development Ordinance, approval of the Preliminary Plan is tentative only and shall be effective for a period of twelve (12) months. i. However, Section 10-8-8-H of the Unified Development Ordinance Expiration and Lapse of Approval states, any Planned Unit Development in which there has been no Building Permit issued nor any portion of the property platted after three (3) years since approval by the City Council, the Planned Unit Development shall be considered null and void and shall be brought back before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council for consideration prior to any development on the property. The underlining zoning of the Planned Unit Development shall not expire, only the Planned Unit Development overlay shall expire. j. Therefore, staff interprets the expiration of the Preliminary PUD Plan is three (3) years after approval of the Planned Unit Development if no portion of the property is final platted. 11. PROPOSED PHASING SCHEDULE – The petitioner proposes to develop the subject property in fourteen (14) phases over an estimated ten (10) year period, with each phase anticipated to include one (1) building. According to the Project Cardinal narrative, each building is expected to become operational within 24 months of its groundbreaking. 6 k. It is unclear if phasing will occur in numerical order of the depicted buildings on the Site Plan (e.g., Building #1 will be Phase 1, Building #2 will be Phase 2, etc.). l. Staff recommends the phasing plan be implemented to minimize impacts on nearby residential structures by prioritizing initial development at the farthest distance from existing residential structures. m. The petitioner must provide a detailed phasing schedule table as a separate document or be depicted on the Site Plan for specificity within the PUD agreement. 12. BUILDING SETBACKS/BUILDING SEPARATION – Per the Table 10-3-9(A) Bulk and Dimensional Standards, the following compares current M-2 General Manufacturing District building setback standards with the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) requested modifications (Deviation #1): BUILDING SETBACKS REQUIRED MINIMUM SETBACKS M-2 DISTRICT PROPOSED MINIMUM SETBACKS SITE PLAN* FRONT YARD (Bridge Street/IL Rte. 47) 25’ 25’ SIDE YARD (North – Baseline Road/South- Galena Road) Min. 10% of lot/Max. 20’ 20’ REAR YARD (Ashe Road) 0’ 0’ *The petitioner is seeking to have the setbacks apply only to the boundary/perimeter of the subject property rather than each individual building on the site. For the purposes of the perimeter setbacks, the petitioner is requesting Bridge Street/IL Rte. 47 is the established front yard and Ashe Road is the established rear yard. a. It appears most buildings on the Site Plan exceed the required minimum building setbacks for the M-2 District. 1. Please provide dimensioned distances in feet (US) of proposed buildings to the adjacent property lines. b. Does the petitioner anticipate consolidating the various parcels into a single zoning lot or will the parcels be resubdivided for each building/user? 1. Regardless on the future platting of the data center campus, City Council approval will be required for any Final Plat. Therefore, is the petitioner seeking a zero (0) foot building setback for all yards on the future plats, as Section 10-8-6-C-6.c(6) of the Unified Development Ordinance requires building setback lines on all lots? If so, staff supports this request. c. Building Separation – In consideration of the internal setback relief of buildings within the data center campus, staff recommends a minimum 500-foot building separation from the nearest data center building or structure (primary or accessory) to the nearest residential or commercial structure. 7 1. Please provide dimensioned distances in feet (US) of proposed buildings to the nearest existing residential or commercial structures. 13. ENERGY INDUSTRIAL USES - Use standards for Energy Industrial Uses are reserved for future regulations, if ever approved, under Section 10-4-10 in the Unified Development Ordinance. n. The petitioner is seeking waiver of future standards adopted being applicable to this subject property after adoption of the Planned Unit Development (Deviation #2). o. The City is currently in the process of adopting specific development standards for data center campus developments. p. Staff is open to granting a lock on future regulations under this section of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for a period of ten (10) years, provided the applicant agrees to all staff-recommended development standards outlined in this memorandum, which incorporate the proposed best practices, design guidelines, and operational requirements intended to ensure the least impactful and high-quality development across the data center campus. 14. NUCLEAR ENERGY USES – Staff will require that the petitioner agree that the data center campus be strictly prohibited from using, generating, storing, or deploying nuclear energy as a power source within the City. This includes, but is not limited to, nuclear reactors, small modular reactors (SMRs), or any other nuclear-based technology. 15. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT - The M-2 District does not have a maximum building height per Table 10-3-9(A) in the Unified Development Ordinance. However, the petitioner has provided overall building heights for each proposed two-story data center building to top of building roof and top of rooftop equipment. As proposed buildings will not exceed 55’ to top of structure and 78’ to top of rooftop equipment. q. Staff recommends a maximum overall height for data center buildings within 1,500 feet of a residential structure shall be 70 feet. No rooftop mechanical equipment will be allowed within this buffer, unless specifically approved by City Council. i. It is noted on the Site Plan and Enlarged Site Plan the petitioner has indicated a “2,000 ft. Residence District Building Height Restriction Zone”. 1. One (1) Customer Substation, the entirety of Buildings 12, 13, 14, and portions of Buildings 9, 10, and 11 fall within this zone. 2. Residential land uses to the north of Baseline Road (Kane County) and to the west of Ashe Road (Kendall County) do not appear to be contemplated in the provided restriction zone. 16. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE – Per Section 10-3-9(A) of the Unified Development Ordinance, the maximum lot coverage for the M-2 District (inclusive of sidewalks, parking areas and all impervious surfaces) is 85% of the gross lot area. According to the Site Data Table on the Preliminary PUD Plan, lot coverage calculations are provided as 41% (18,552,808 sq. ft.). 17. VEHICULAR/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS – It is noted that the site has access eight (8) points of access. Two (2) off of N. Bridge Street (IL Rte. 47), four (4) off of Galena Road, one (1) on Ashe 8 Road, and one (1) off Baseline Road (Rte. 30). These access points lead to internal private roadways which loop around the fourteen (14) proposed buildings and connect to the electric substations and utility switchyard. ii. It is noted that three (3) access points – two (2) off of Galena and one (1) off of Baseline Road will be direct employee access the respective data center building portions of the campus. Additionally, remaining two (2) access points located on Galena Road are intended exclusively for the user, ComEd, and emergency medical services (EMS) to the electrical substation and utility switchyard. These access points will also be locked and secured. iii. The proposed primary access points to the data center will occur through the one (1) access point on Ashe Road and two (2) off of N. Bridge Street (Rte. 47). These points of access will be fenced and guarded stations requiring extensive security verification before entry. iv. Staff defers to City Engineer regarding site access and roadway alignments. r. Cross Access – Per Section 10-5-1-F of the Unified Development Ordinance, the petitioner is seeking relief from the providing cross access between adjoining developments which minimizes access points along streets, encourages shared parking, and allows for vehicular access between land uses (Deviation #3). i. According to Section 10-5-1-F-2-c The Zoning Administrator may waive or modify the requirement for vehicular cross access on determining that such cross access is impractical or undesirable because it would require crossing a significant physical barrier or environmentally sensitive area, would create unsafe conditions, or there exists an inability to connect to adjacent property. City Council shall have the authority to waive or modify vehicular cross access requirements for all public review processes involving review by City Council. Staff supports the waiver. s. Pedestrian Circulation – Per Section 10-5-1-N Pedestrian Circulation Standards of the Unified Development Ordinance required off-street parking areas to on-site pedestrian circulation systems and connection to existing and future planned trails. The petitioner states that walkways between parking areas and building entrances will be provided on-site, however they seek a waiver for public access and connection to public sidewalks and bicycle trails due to the nature and security of the proposed land use (Deviation #5). i. According to Section 10-5-1-N-5, the Zoning Administrator may waive this requirement upon determining that no walkway exists, a future walkway is unlikely to exist, or such connection would create a safety hazard. Staff supports the waiver. ii. In consideration of the requested waiver, staff requests the petitioner constructs and provides easements for a ten-foot (10’) multi-use walking trail on the outer perimeter of the proposed data center at the following locations: 1. Ashe Road/Galena north to Baseline Road 2. Baseline Road from Ashe/Eldamain Road east to Bridge Street (Rte. 47) 9 18. PARKING - According to the Site Plan submitted, there are 3,750 total parking spaces to be provided on the property to accommodate the proposed fourteen (14) building data center campus and electric substation/utility switchyard uses as detailed below: Location Sq. Ft. Provided Parking Spaces Parking Required 0.3 Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. Building 1 1,361,182 300 408.35 Building 2 1,361,182 300 408.35 Building 3 780,000 150 234.00 Building 4 780,000 150 234.00 Building 5 1,361,182 300 408.35 Building 6 1,361,182 300 408.35 Building 7 1,361,182 300 408.35 Building 8 1,361,182 300 408.35 Building 9 1,361,182 300 408.35 Building 10 1,361,182 300 408.35 Building 11 1,361,182 300 408.35 Building 12 780,000 150 234 Building 13 1,361,182 300 408.35 Building 14 1,361,182 300 408.35 TOTAL 17,313,002 3750 5193.85 t. Per Table 10-5-1(H)(5) Minimum Parking Requirements of the Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance, staff would classify the data center campus for the purposes of off-site parking as an industrial use, which requires a minimum of 0.3 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of net floor area (NFA) for uses greater than 8,000 sq. ft. While there is no specific information provided as to the individual proposed buildings, the petitioner estimates the average building size is 1,878,142 sq. ft. requiring ~505 parking spaces per building, however, they contend the actual parking demand will be approximately 375 spaces per building (Deviation #4). u. Staff has estimated the total required parking for the subject property is 5,194 spaces, including 114 ADA accessible spaces. Additionally, per Section 10-5-1K-1 of the Unified Development Ordinance, the petitioner is required to install the infrastructure for a minimum of 104 electric vehicle charging stations. i. Staff is not opposed to the requested shared parking request and proposed reduction in off-street parking, however, staff recommends a fee in lieu of the required electrical vehicle charging station infrastructure which will be used to install electric charging stations in the downtown or at other public facilities. v. Bicycle Parking – Per Section 10-5-1-O-2 of the Unified Development Ordinance to provision of bicycle parking is encouraged, not required, and if utilized on a development site will allow for a reduction of required off-street parking. The petitioner is seeking a waiver to not provide off-street bicycle parking (Deviation #6). i. No waiver required as it is a parking bonus mechanism, not a requirement. w. Off-Street Loading – Per Section 10-5-1-Q of the Unified Development Ordinance, the number of off-street shall be determined on a case-by-case basis, and in the 10 instance of special uses, loading berths adequate number and size to serve such use, as determined by the Zoning Administrators, shall be provided. The petitioner requests a minimum of one (1) off-street loading space per data center campus building on the subject property (Deviation #7). Staff supports the request. 19. TRAFFIC IMPACT – The petitioner has provided a Traffic Methodology Memo prepared by Burn McDonnell providing basic trip generation modeling for the proposed data center campus at full buildout. The preliminary report estimates a daily total of 2,792 trips. Staff defers to the City Engineer regarding Traffic Methodology Memo. x. Traffic Management Plan – Staff does recommend a traffic management plan be required during construction, including a communication strategy and an on- site point of contact during construction. 20. LANDSCAPING – Section 10-5-3 establishes landscape standards for new developments. While the petitioner has not submitted a landscape plan, they are seeking relief from the minimum requirements (Deviation #8). y. Per staff’s review, the following sections of the Landscape Plan would apply: i. Section 10-5-3-C. Building Foundation Landscape Zone - All nonresidential, mixed-use, and multi-family development where a front yard setback is required, with the exception of food processing facilities regulated by the FDA, shall include landscape located at the building foundation as required by this section. Landscape required by this section shall be in addition to landscape required under other sections of this title. It is the objective of this section to provide a softening effect at the base of buildings. 1. Petitioner has indicated base building foundation on Enlarged Site Plans. ii. Section 10-5-3-D. Parking Area Perimeter Landscape Zone - Landscape required by this section shall be in addition to landscape required under other sections of this title. It is the objective of this section to provide screening between off-street parking areas and rights-of-way, and to provide for the integration of stormwater management with required landscaping. 1. Petitioner has indicated parking area perimeter landscape zone plantings on Enlarged Site Plans. iii. Section 10-5-3-E. Parking Area Interior Landscape Zone - All off-street parking areas shall include landscape and trees located within the off-street parking area as required by this section. Trees and landscape required by this section shall be in addition to trees and landscape required under other sections of this title. It is the objective of this section to provide shade within parking areas, break up large expanses of parking area pavement, support stormwater management where appropriate, improve the appearance of parking lots as viewed from rights-of-way, and provide a safe pedestrian environment. 1. Petitioner is seeking relief from this standard. Staff supports this request. iv. Section 10-5-3-F. Transition Zone Landscape Requirements - Transition zone landscape shall be required along interior side and rear property lines of all nonresidential, mixed use, and multi-family development. It is not 11 expected that the transition area will totally screen such uses but rather will minimize land use conflicts and enhance aesthetics. 1. Petitioner has indicated a 100’ Transition Type D Zone Landscape Buffer on Enlarged Site Plans. 2. Staff recommends the installation of an 8-foot-tall berm along all perimeters of the data center campus as part of the 100’ landscape buffer due to the site’s adjacency to four (4) public roadways. 21. MECHANICAL SCREENING – Per Section 10-5-4 Screening of the Unified Development Ordinance, ground/wall-mounted and roof mounted mechanical units that are visible from any public right-of-way or adjacent residential property shall be screened from public view. Petitioner is seeking to establish standards for screening both types of mechanical units (Deviation #9). z. Petitioner proposes to screen ground mounted mechanical equipment with vinyl fencing matching the height of the generator units but excluding any stacks protruding above the unit. No additional screening is proposed for rooftop mechanical units located within penthouses. i. It is staff’s preference that mechanical equipment, particularly backup generators and condensers, are not located on the rooftop. Rather placed on the side of the building(s) or the opposite side of the facility, farthest from residential structures. ii. If approved to be placed on the rooftop, staff recommends they be enclosed in penthouses, as the petitioner proposed, with sound damping construction and use of the lowest-noise equipment available, such as hospital-grade mufflers on generators, to aid in minimizing noise impacts on surrounding properties. iii. All major mechanical equipment (generators, chillers, HVAC units) shall be fully enclosed or screened by solid barriers. iv. Staff defers to the sound engineering consultant for any additional recommendations with regards to mechanical screening. 22. FENCING – Per Section 10-5-5-B-1 of the Unified Development Ordinance states fences may be built up to the property line but shall not extend beyond the front plane of the primary building facade in residential and business districts. Maximum height for fencing in manufacturing districts is eight (8) feet. aa. Petitioner has provided a manufacturers brochure of proposed high security steel fencing. They are requesting to have ten (10) foot tall powder coated black steel 12 security fence extend beyond the front plane of the primary building façade (Deviation #10). i. Since the fence placement requirement only applies to residential and business district uses, staff is supportive of the request as this property is within a manufacturing district. ii. The request for a ten-foot (10’-0”) tall security fence which exceeds the maximum permitted eight-foot (8’-0”) tall fence is supported by staff. iii. Staff understands that the fences will be locked with access (assuming via a Knox Box) to ComEd officials and EMS teams (assuming Bristol Kendall Fire District and Yorkville Police Department). 23. BATTERY STORAGE – Per Table 10-3-12(B) of the Unified Development Ordinance, “Battery Uses” are permitted within the M-2 General Manufacturing District. “Battery Uses” are defined as a use that enables battery manufacturing, charging, recycling, warehousing, storage, and related uses. This may also include uses that derive energy from renewable sources, such as wind and solar power, to be collected, stored, and then released for later use to an electric grid, power plant or private user. bb. The petitioner’s plans do not indicate that battery uses, or storage, is proposed for the development. Please verify if battery uses or storage is planned for the proposed data center campus. cc. If so, staff will require the following: i. Battery uses and storage systems shall be located in a separate standalone building a minimum of 50 feet away from any adjacent structure and must be readily accessible by the fire protection district for firefighting efforts. ii. An approved fire safety and evacuation plan shall be prepared and maintained for occupancies that involve activities for the research and development, testing, manufacturing, handling, or storage of lithium-ion batteries or lithium metal batteries, or the repair or servicing of vehicles powered by lithium – ion batteries or lithium metal batteries. (See comment #30 Recommended Operational Conditions) iii. A fire detection and alarm system is required for indoor storage rooms and outdoor storage. The method of fire detection is either an air-aspirating system or a radiant- energy sensing system. Indoor rooms are also required to be sprinklered and separated from the remainder of the occupancy by two-hour barriers. This structure must provide a 2-hour fire-resistance- rated enclosure and must have an automatic sprinkler system and detection system. 24. APPEARANCE STANDARDS – Per Section 10-5-8-C-4 Industrial Uses masonry products or precast concrete shall be incorporated on at least fifty (50) percent of the total building, as broken down as follows: The "front facade" (defined as that facade that faces a street that includes a main entry to the building) shall itself incorporate masonry products or precast concrete on at least fifty (50) percent of the facade. Any other facade that abuts a street shall incorporate masonry products or precast concrete. The use of masonry products or precast concrete is encouraged on the remaining facades. Where precast concrete panels or split face block is utilized, the use of colors, patterns, or other architectural features within these panels/blocks is encouraged. dd. The petitioner has submitted exterior building elevations featuring predominantly blank, monolithic wall structures composed of materials such as light grey precast concrete panels, medium grey insulated metal panels, glazing, and vinyl screen walls 13 with metal downspout accents. While the use of precast concrete panels aligns with the material requirements of the Appearance Standards, the overall design and color palette fall short of meeting those standards and fail to present an aesthetically acceptable appearance. ee. Further, Section 10-5-8-C-4b.(2) requires industrial buildings with facades greater than one hundred (100) feet in length shall incorporate recesses, projections, windows, or other ornamental/architectural features along at least thirty (30) percent of the length of the facade abutting a public street in an effort to break up the mass of the structure. Petitioner is seeking relief from this requirement (Deviation #11). i. To achieve compliance with the Appearance Standards and enhance the visual quality of the proposed development, staff recommends the petitioner revise the building elevations to incorporate greater architectural articulation, variation in materials, and a more dynamic color palette. Elements such as vertical and horizontal modulation, material transitions, and fenestration should be integrated to break up the monolithic appearance of the facades and improve overall aesthetics. ii. Staff further recommends buildings visible from Route 47 have the highest aesthetic standards that can be economically achieve. It is important that these structures which will be located at the entrance into the City will make a statement. Should a central roadway (E. Beecher) go through the site intersecting at Baseline Road, the building facades facing this roadway should be a better than average standard (but maybe slightly less than the Route 47 facades). iii. As part of the revised submittal, the petitioner shall provide a comprehensive architectural rendering of the data center buildings, along with viewpoint renderings from each adjacent public roadway. These renderings must include proposed landscaping to accurately depict the visual impact of the development and demonstrate how the revised elevations contribute to a more context-sensitive and visually appealing design. 25. LOTS – The petitioner is seeking waiver from the requirement for lots to have access on a public street due to the unique nature of the secure data center campus (Deviation #12). ff. Per Section 10-7-2 requires all lots to conform with district standards and states all lots shall front or abut on a public street. Since the site has internal private roadways, staff is supportive of the request. 26. STREET DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENTS – The petitioner is requesting exemption from the requirements of Section 10-7-3 in the Unified Development Ordinance (Deviation #13). gg. Standards in this section apply only to publicly dedicated roadways. No internal roads are proposed for public dedication. Staff supports this request but defers to the City Engineer regarding the extension of E. Beecher Road northward toward Baseline Road. 27. SIGNAGE – The petitioner does not appear to propose any wall/building mounted signage on the exterior elevations. 14 hh. Per Section 10-6-6 of the Unified Development Ordinance, single tenant buildings shall be permitted a total of two (2) primary wall signs or one (1) primary wall sign per one hundred (100) linear feet of building frontage. One (1) additional wall sign shall be allowed per additional hundred (100) feet of building frontage. Only one (1) primary wall sign shall be displayed on any single building façade. ii. Are monument signs or wayfinding signage proposed within the data center campus? i. See comments under #20 Comprehensive Plan and #32 Development Offsets entryway and placemaking elements. 28. SITE ADDRESSING – Will the internal roadways be named for individual addressing, or will the petitioner seek a single site address off of Bridge Street, Ashe Road or Baseline Road with internal building numbering/identification? 29. LIGHTING – A photometric plan shall be provided along with manufacturers cut sheets of the proposed light standards to be installed within the parking lot area, per Section 10-5-7 of the Unified Development Ordinance. Maximum illumination at the property line shall not exceed zero (0) foot-candle and no glare shall spill onto adjacent properties or rights of way. jj. How tall do you anticipate the light standards will be for the data center campus? i. Maximum light standard height for manufacturing districts is 35 ft. Staff may recommend a shorter height. kk. Are lights proposed for the future water tank parcel? 30. RECOMMENDED OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS – The following is a list of operational conditions recommended by staff to be included in the Planned Unit Development for all future data center campus developments, aimed at addressing resident concerns and maintaining quality of life: ll. Noise Study – All applications for data centers shall provide a noise study as part of the building permitting process which will be subject to review by the City’s sound engineering consultant which entails: i. A pre-construction noise study including baseline noise measurements of the current environment and predictive modeling in phased and at full buildout to ensure the facility’s design will meet local noise limits ii. A mitigation plan in their noise study to ensure that operational noise does not exceed the pre-development baseline measured at the property. iii. Annual noise monitoring is recommended to be conducted by the City’s sound engineering consultant for a period of three (3) years after construction is completed to verify ongoing noise compliance. mm. Operational Testing – Operational testing of emergency backup generators shall be limited to the following: i. Only between the hours of 11am-5pm on weekdays and non-holidays. 15 nn. Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) - Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) shall be submitted and approved by the City and Fire Protection District (BKFD) prior to issuance of a building permit and must include: i. Procedures for fire suppression, hazardous material spills, evacuation, and communication in case of an incident. ii. Training sessions/drill and or walkthroughs with fire and police shall be required prior to occupancy permit. iii. Designated contacts for emergency services and a plan to broadcast information if an incident could affect the public. iv. Must work with KenCom emergency managers to be part of text or siren alert systems. oo. Building Code Standards – The following building code standards shall apply: i. Installing advanced early fire detection in server rooms, using fire- resistive construction beyond code minimums on walls facing neighborhoods, or providing additional hazardous material safeguards. ii. Compliance with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 855. 31. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN – The 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update designates the subject property for Project Cardinal as “Estate/Conservation Residential (ECR)” and “Parks and Open Space (OS)”. The “Estate/Conservation Residential (ECR)” is intended to provide flexibility for residential design which will accommodate low-density detached single-family housing. The “Parks and Open Space (OS)” designation is intended for recreational lands and the preservation of open space areas utilized for public or private lands. pp. The current future land use designations reflect the current underlying approved zoning and plans for the Bailey Meadows and Westhaven PUDs. The Comprehensive Plan also anticipated the west side of N. Bridge Street (IL Rt. 47) in this area for open space parkland or “green infrastructure”. qq. Overall, staff supports the proposed PUD for a data center campus, as the corridor along Eldamain Road (“Ashe Road” when north of Galena Road) has been identified in the Comprehensive Plan for manufacturing development and has also experienced a recent trend of development for M-2 land uses (specifically data centers). However, staff would like to note the following recommendations from the Comprehensive Plan related to the subject property: i. In Figure 8.17: Eldamain Road Corridor Land Use Strategy of the Yorkville 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update (North of the Fox River) the subject area is identified as “Zone B – Distribution (Corneils Road to BNSF Railroad)” meaning this area is recommended for modern industrial park incorporating branding and placemaking elements, as well as a 50’ to 100’ buffer to maintain the zone’s semi-rural visual character. 16 ii. In Figure 8.5: Zone A North Gateway Future Land Use Concept (Baseline Road to Galena Road) and Figure 8.20: Rural Agricultural Zone A Future Land Use Concept (Baseline Road to Corneils Road) each indicate an opportunity to create gateway signage and enhance the roadway with landscaping elements introducing the entryway into the City. 17 32. DEVELOPMENT OFFSETS - As part of the City’s efforts to balance the scale and impact of the proposed 1,034-acre data center development, the petitioner is expected to provide appropriate development offsets that support the broader community. These include contributing to gateway signage that enhances the City’s identity, donating land and funding the development of a regional public park to compensate for the loss of land and land-cash contributions, and community investment within the downtown as described below: rr. Entryway/Gateway Signs i. Staff requests the petitioner provides the necessary easements and funds the design, fabrication, and cost for the installation of three (3) gateway signs and/or entryway features as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. 1. Staff further believes this will also assist the petitioner in meeting PUD Modification Standard #4 “Placemaking.” The Planned Unit Development has a distinctive identity and brand that is utilized in the signs, streetscape, architecture, public gathering spaces, open spaces, etc. ss. Parks & Recreation i. It is estimated that the conversion of the 1,034-acre subject property to a data center campus, which was previously planned for dense single-family and townhome residential development with nearly 2,100 dwelling units, is equivalent to a loss of $3.2 million in park land-cash contributions. ii. Staff requests the petitioner purchase and donates specific land identified by the Parks and Recreation Department Director within the vicinity of the data center development to be utilized for a future regional park site. The petitioner will also provide upfront funding for the development of the park facility. 1. Staff further believes this will assist in the petitioner meeting PUD Modification Standard #10 “Provision of a Regional Park.” The Planned Unit Development includes a park of sufficient size and with high quality amenities adequate to draw visitors and provide recreational opportunities for residents throughout the region in addition to serving residents of Yorkville. tt. Utility Infrastructure i. It is expected that a separate development agreement will cover the expansion of water, sewer, and sanitary sewer district services, including service commitments, cost offsets, and the associated design engineering agreements. uu. Utility & Property Taxes i. Staff requests the petitioner provide estimates of utility taxes and property taxes expected to be generated per building, and whether we can publicly disclose those estimates. 18 vv. Community Investment i. Staff recommends a community investment donation from the petitioner to support the development of the Hydraulic District project. This contribution which can be separate to, or in combination with, the Parks and Recreation donation in comment #32. Staff believes this contribution reflects a commitment to fostering long-term community partnerships and ensuring that large-scale developments like the data center generate shared benefits. The Hydraulic District project is a catalyst for revitalization, economic growth, and quality-of-life improvements, and the petitioner’s investment will help accelerate these outcomes for the broader community. PINS Property Owner Mailing Address 14-31-200-002 GRUBE, ROBERT P 2011 TRUST ET AL CAPS 801 WARRENVILLE RD STE 150 LISLE, IL, 60532-4328 14-31-300-001 J M FARM LLC DEBRA BAUMGARTNER 2506 N CLARK ST STE 2950 CHICAGO, IL, 60614-1849 14-31-400-001 J M FARM LLC DEBRA BAUMGARTNER 2506 N CLARK ST STE 2950 CHICAGO, IL, 60614-1849 14-32-300-001 J M FARM LLC DEBRA BAUMGARTNER 2506 N CLARK ST STE 2950 CHICAGO, IL, 60614-1849 14-32-300-007 FOTOPOULOS, ELIZABETH & NINA A 43W904 BASELINE RD SUGAR GROVE, IL, 60554-9649 14-32-300-006 JERICHO CEMETERY ASSOCIATION % RALPH HARKISON PO BOX 3 BIG ROCK, IL, 60511 14-32-300-008 EILERT, JEFFRIES H DCLRN OF TRUST, TRUSTEE 525 S EDGELAWN DR AURORA, IL, 60506 14-32-300-009 EILERT, JEFFRIES H DCLRN OF TRUST, TRUSTEE 525 S EDGELAWN DR AURORA, IL, 60506 14-32-400-001 EILERT, JEFFRIES H DCLRN OF TRUST, TRUSTEE 525 S EDGELAWN DR AURORA, IL, 60506 14-32-400-002 GRACE LAND LLC 9 BEL AIRE CT BURR RIDGE, IL, 60527-8382 14-33-301-001 JENNINGS, SUZANN M TRUST JAMES A SHERMAN 602B W 5TH AVE NAPERVILLE, IL, 60563-2902 14-33-377-018 HOMESTEAD LAND COMPANY LLC 1107 S BRIDGE ST STE D YORKVILLE, IL, 60560-1747 14-33-400-028 ORMISTON, MAURICE E DCLRN TR # 101 & ET AL 11718 NEWARK RD NEWARK, IL, 60541-9236 14-33-400-029 SUGAR GROVE FAMILY FUN CENTER LLC EDWARD PAROLEK 1099 DEERPATH RD AURORA, IL, 60506 1 I have reviewed the Project Cardinal application package dated 3/14/25 and have the following comments: Concept Site Plan • The plan shows full access from Route 47 at 2 separate locations, have you talked to IDOT regarding these access points? If so, where are you at in the process? • Both the Rt. 47 access points will necessitate a crossing of the Rob Roy drainage ditch, have you had any contact with the drainage district? If so, where are you at in the process? • There are multiple access points shown on Galena Rd., which is a county highway, have you spoken with Kendall County regarding the proposed locations? If so, where are you at in the process? • Are the proposed water tanks shown south of Galena Rd. private or public? • Can you show what the drainage channel will look like, and how it will function without causing erosion? • Do you plan on turf grass for all the areas without buildings? • What are your plans for the cell tower that is currently on site? • There are no sidewalks shown adjacent to any roadway. Please work with all agencies to provide sidewalk/path as required. • The City requires parkway trees. Please refer to our landscape ordinance for guidance on placement and tree species. • Early in the process, we will need a completed traffic study to make sure that all the roadways are built to the correct standards, signalized if necessary, and the appropriate Memorandum To: Krysti Noble, Community Development Director From: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works CC: Date: April 1, 2025 Subject: Project Cardinal PUD Application Review 2 turn lanes installed if needed. Before any traffic studies are completed, the petitioner will need an answer from IDOT regarding the proposed full access entrances. Otherwise, the petitioner would have to perform two separate studies. Study 1 would show the accesses as proposed and study 2 would show no access on Rt. 47. • The Rob Roy Drainage District is responsible for the care of the drainage ditch that is located on the east side of your property. You will need to work with them on any plantings or landscaping that is within 60’ of each side of the centerline of the ditch. • Baseline Rd. and Ashe Rd. will have to be brought up to the current city standard for data centers This will include any improvements that are recommended by a full traffic study. This will be at the sole cost of the developer. • The construction of data centers accounts for far more traffic than the operation of data centers, please provide a detailed traffic plan for construction access for each phase of construction. • Major reconstruction is planned for Rt. 47 in the next few years. As of now it is planned for Galena Rd. to be closed for a very long period to construct a new bridge over the Rob Roy drainage ditch Once that is completed, they plan on opening Galena and closing Baseline to build another bridge. You will need to account for this in your construction traffic plan. Required Deviations Section • In your list of required deviations, you ask for relief from public streets due to the unique and secure nature of a data center campus. This appears more like 3 individual developments segmented by the Com Ed owned right of way. Each cluster of building has their own fence and substation/switchgear, their own entrance, and stormwater basins. Therefore, public streets could be added without any danger to the campus since they are already divided. A connection from East Beecher to Mighell Rd. would be a logical point to look at for a public street. • Can you provide a more detailed landscape plan with example drawings of each area? • There is a very large landscape surfacing that was left as TBD, this needs to be determined before anything can be approved. • Bicycle parking is very feasible, you are required to place sidewalk or trail surrounding your property and there will be a trail on the east side of Rt. 47 that runs from the south side of the city that provides the necessary access to your site. Yorkville Police Department Memorandum 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4340 Fax: 630-553-1141 Date: March 25, 2025 To: Krysti Barksdale-Noble (Community Development Director) From: James Jensen (Chief of Police) Reference: List Project Name: Project Cardinal - Pioneer List Applicant Name: Matt McCarron (Pioneer Development) List Project Manager: List Project Number: PZC 2025-07 Please see comments listed below pertaining to the project referenced above: Roadway & Property Signage Handicapped Signage Required: _X_ Yes ____ No **Signage must meet MUTCD Standards **Fine amount must be listed on sign Speed Limit Signage Required/Recommended ____ Yes __X__ No School Zone Special Signage ____ Yes __X__ No Special Speed Zone Signage Requested ____ Yes __X__ No Comments: All roadways other than surrounding primary roadways are private and do not require speed limit signage. NO Construction Traffic Signage being requested? __X__ Yes ____ No Comment #1: Proper construction routes should be identified. Secondary roadways unless properly constructed should not be used. Proper signage is being requested. Comment #2: Construction routes should be clearly posted and shared with employees. Alternate routes should be identified due to upcoming Route 47 construction and the closing of the intersection of Route 47 & Galena Road. Comment #3: Yorkville Police Department would request direct contact with construction managers in case a traffic problem has been identified. ***We request that all signage is posted prior to the first occupancy permit being issued for each POD or phase.*** Yorkville Police Department Memorandum 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4340 Fax: 630-553-1141 ***All traffic control signage must conform to MUTCH Standards specific to location, size, color, and height levels*** Roadway Do you have intersection Concerns? __X__ Yes ____ No Comments: We do have intersection concerns with the private driveways coming out onto Route 47 and Galena Roadway. Both roadways are well traveled with higher speed limits. Entrance/Exits match up with adjacent driveways? ____ Yes __X__ No Total Entrance/Exits for development? 4 – Galena Road 2 – Route 47 Are vehicle entrance/exits safe? ____ Yes ____ No Are warning signs for cross traffic requested? ____ Yes ____ No Comments: Direct entrances/exits to Galena Road and Route 47 should be reviewed, clearly marked and properly signed. Emergency Contact for after hours during construction Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Is this a gated or controlled access development? __X__ Yes ____ No If yes, will police & Fire and Access? ____ Yes ____ No Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Security Yorkville Police Department Memorandum 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4340 Fax: 630-553-1141 Will security cameras be in use? ____ Yes ____ No Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Will the business/management provide the police department remote access to the camera system (User credentials only)? ____ Yes ____ No Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. What are the business Hours of Operation? Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Will the property be alarmed? ____ Yes ____ No Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Will you provide Floor Plans/Maps to the police department ____ Yes ____ No Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Emergency Contact information is being requested. Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Miscellaneous Comments Noise Ordinance Concerns __X__ Yes ____ No Yorkville Police Department Memorandum 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4340 Fax: 630-553-1141 Comments: Concerns specific to noise on site (i.e. generators) Criminal Investigations Procedures Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. Emergency Operations & Continuity of Operations Comments: Yorkville Police Department would request additional meetings with security leadership to discuss law enforcement response and expected responsibilities during and after construction. I hope you find this information helpful, and we look forward to reviewing the revisions. If you should have any questions, comments, or concerns please do not hesitate to contact me. 2 B Bristol Kendall Fire Department Fire Prevention Bureau 103 East Beaver Street Yorkville, IL 60560-1704 Tel: 630 553-6186 Fax: 630 553-1482 03/26/25 Krysti, This is from the 2024 IFC, 403.10.6 - Lithium and Lithium metal Batteries- An approved fire safety and evacuation plan in accordance with section 404 shall be prepared and maintained for occupancies that involve activities for the research and development, testing, manufacturing, handling, or storage of lithium-ion batteries or lithium metal batteries, or the repair or servicing of vehicles powered by lithium – ion batteries or lithium metal batteries. 320.4.3.3 Fire Detection – A fire detection and alarm system is required for indoor storage rooms and outdoor storage. The method of fire detection is either an air-aspirating system or a radiant- energy sensing system. Indoor rooms are also required to be sprinklered and separated from the remainder of the occupancy by two-hour barriers. This structure must provide a 2-hour fire-resistance-rated enclosure and must have an automatic sprinkler system and detection system. If you have any questions or need further assistance, feel free to contact me. Respectfully, Michael Torrence Battalion/Fire Marshal Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District 630-768-3200 MT/1 Soundscape Engineering 3711 N. Ravenswood Ave., Ste. 104 • Chicago, IL 60613 • (312) 436-0032 729 W. Ann Arbor Trl., Ste. 150 • Plymouth, MI 48170 • (734) 418-8663 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com MEMORANDUM April 7, 2025 To: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director, United City of Yorkville, knoble@yorkville.il.us From: Aimee Lalime, INCE Bd. Cert. Nathan Sevener, INCE Bd. Cert. Re: Project Cardinal Proposed Data Center Campus and On-site Substations Development Preliminary Comments on Potential Noise Transmission to the Community Per Soundscape Engineering’s consulting services contract with the United City of Yorkville, we are providing the following preliminary comments regarding potential noise transmission from the proposed development of a data center campus with on-site substations to the surrounding community. At this time, there is insufficient Project information available to allow calculation of noise transmission from the proposed Development to the surrounding community. However, based on our experience, review of the Preliminary PUD Plan dated 3/14/25, and the uses of the properties near the proposed site, we can provide the following comments for your consideration. 1. Chapter 4 of the Yorkville Code of Ordinances restricts noise transmission to both residential and commercial land uses. The limit on sound transmission to residential land uses during the nighttime is the most restrictive (50 dBA). Since the proposed Data Center Campus can be expected to operate during both daytime and nighttime, nighttime sound level limits will need to be considered when evaluating noise transmission from the proposed Data Center Campus. 2. In our experience, the primary noise sources associated with Data Centers are the electrical power generators and the cooling equipment. 3. The Applicant should note, in particular, that the Noise Ordinance includes a 10 dB sound level limit penalty for noise that is tonal in character. Some types of cooling equipment, such as chillers, can emit tonal noise. 4. There is a large residential development within Yorkville limits (Bristol Bay condos) located approximately 1300 ft east of the closest building on the proposed Project Cardinal Campus; 900 feet of this distance is a setback within the proposed project site. For properties at this distance, it may be difficult for the Data Center Campus to comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance. 5. The closest residential land use within the City of Yorkville is 800 feet south of the proposed data center property line at 10346 Galena Road. With concerted effort, it might be possible for the Data Center Campus to comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance. This location is of particular concern to us due to its proximity to the proposed development. Project Cardinal Data Center – Preliminary Comments April 7, 2025 SE No. 2312 Page 2 of 2 Soundscape Engineering 3711 N. Ravenswood Ave., Ste. 104 • Chicago, IL 60613 • (312) 436-0032 729 W. Ann Arbor Trl., Ste. 150 • Plymouth, MI 48170 • (734) 418-8663 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com 6. Based on our noise control engineering experience and review of similar-sized data center campuses, the project will need to consider noise control early in the design, using thoughtful site planning, locating cooling equipment and generators as far as possible from residents, and selecting low-noise equipment. Since the nighttime ordinance is more stringent, it may be necessary for some of the equipment to be programmed to operate at quieter, but less efficient, operating modes during nighttime hours. In addition to equipment selection, load settings, and siting, meeting the noise ordinance may also require noise control screening, compressor wraps, or other approaches for the outdoor cooling equipment. Noise control enclosures and mufflers will most likely be needed for the generators. 7. The Applicant should provide a noise impact assessment report for review by the City. The report should describe how the assessment was performed, list the specific noise-generating equipment associated with operation of the Data Center Campus and On-site Substation, describe any noise control approaches and equipment that will be included in the project design, and confirm that the City’s noise ordinance will be met. Noise source data for the cooling equipment shall be based on actual sound level measurements of the specific equipment planned for the project, made in accordance with nationally recognized standards, not on interpolated, extrapolated, or otherwise calculated sound levels. 8. The City should consider whether it wishes to require the applicant to perform post-construction acoustic testing to demonstrate compliance with the noise ordinance. 9. We understand that some members of the community are concerned about noise emissions from the planned data center campus. The community noise ordinance protects Yorkville residents by limiting noise transmission to residential land uses to 60 dBA during the day and 50 dBA at night. In addition, tonal noise sources are required to be 10 dBA below those values (50 dBA daytime and 40 dBA at night). For reference, the Route 47 traffic noise at the closest Bristol Bay condos (400’ from the roadway) is estimated to be as low as 55 dBA at night and as high as 63 dBA during the day. This suggests that residences located near busy roadways will not experience a significant impact from data center noise. 10. Our comments are only in relation to the City of Yorkville noise ordinance and do not consider compliance relative to any other jurisdictions, including Kendall County, Kane County, or the Illinois Pollution Control Board. 11. Similarly, our comments are focused on residential and commercial land uses that are currently within the City of Yorkville. There are, however, several single-family residences located very near the proposed development that are not currently within the City of Yorkville. These residences are located immediately across the road to the North, South, and West of the proposed Data Center Campus on Baseline, Galena, and Ashe Roads. **END OF MEMORANDUM** 1 Monica Cisija Subject:FW: Written Comment for May 6th 2025 meeting ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Elizabeth Fotopoulos <> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2025 1:18 PM To: Jori Behland <jBehland@yorkville.il.us> Subject: Written Comment for May 6th 2025 meeting This is for the meeting on May 6th 2025 Elizabeth Fotopoulos “Economic development committee: project cardinal data center” My questions for the committee are 1) The plan provided shows water/storm basins being utilized throughout the plan to help mediate noise pollution to residences in addition to help create a more aesthetically pleasing environment. Why was there no plan to put a storm basin in front of my home that is located at the corner of Baseline Road and Mighell Rd? ‐I would like to formally request that this Plan be revised to include a storm basin located in front of my home that is similar to the majority of the homes surrounding this location. 2) what is the developer and or committee doing about noise pollution? this large of a data center could cause significant noise pollution in this area to residents, causing neurological and mental health stressors in addition to medical issues and complications. These kinds of complications have been reported in numerous research studies by residence who live next to these types of data centers. 3) how much data is being processed or projected to be processed through this facility? How much of this data is identified as United States data, local data, and worldly data? 4)what is the plan and committee doing to help ensure safety of not just this data center, but the residence that live in this area. I’m speaking specifically not to cyber attacks but terrorism that could come in the form of destroying the data center‐being that it could be providing significant data resources to individual throughout the world. 5) what is the developers plan to ensure that during the construction of this facility garbage and debris, including significant dust and dirt kick up is kept to a minimum and does not impact the residents who are living in this area? 6) when it comes to cooling this facility why would the developers identify this area as a prime location for a date center that needs to be cooled significantly when during the spring to early fall months, this area is incredibly hot and humid. 7) how does the developer plan to mediate the cooling issue of this data center so that it doesn’t impact local residence? Thank you, Elizabeth Sent from my iPhone Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Purchasing Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #7 Tracking Number EDC 2025-42 Data Center Development Standards (Text Amendment) Economic Development Committee – June 3, 2025 Majority Approval Proposed a text amendment to establish specific regulations for data center developments. Sara Mendez Community Development Name Department 1 UPDATE At the May 6, 2025, Economic Development Committee meeting, the data center development standards - text amendment was not discussed due to a lack of quorum. Upon recommendation by the City Council, the item was authorized to proceed to the Planning and Zoning Commission as originally scheduled. At the May 14, 2025, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for the item. As a result, there were no public comments and no further questions from the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Commission unanimously recommended approval to amend the data center development standards. Since the item has not been discussed at an Economic Development Committee meeting, this item is being brought back to the June 3, 2025, Economic Development Committee to ensure the Committee can provide any suggestions prior to City Council consideration. PLANNING & ZONING ACTION The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the proposed data center development standards – text amendment on May 14, 2025. The commission made the following action on the motion for the request below: In consideration of testimony presented during a Public Hearing on May 14, 2025 and discussions conducted at that meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a request to amend Section 10-4-10, Energy Industrial Use Standards, of the Unified Development Ordinance to establish development regulations for data center facilities, as presented in a staff memorandum dated May 7, 2025. Action Item: Linnane – aye; Green – aye; Williams – aye; Crouch – aye; Vinyard – aye; Forristall – aye. 6 ayes; 0 nays Attachments 1.PZC Staff Memo dated May 7, 2025 2.Proposed Amendments to Section 10-4-10 Energy Industrial Use Standards 3.Public Hearing Notice Affidavit Memorandum To: From: CC: Date: Economic Development Committee Sara Mendez, Planner I Bart Olson, City Administrator Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Lynn Dubajic, Economic Development Consultant May 20, 2025 Subject: PZC 2025-05 Data Center Development Standards – Text Amendment 1 Summary A request to amend Section 10-4-10. Energy Industrial Use Standards in the Unified Development Ordinance regarding data center facilities. The proposed amendments would introduce development regulations petitioners would be required to follow. Need for Data Center Development Standards: Over the past year, the City has been approached by multiple data center developers and speculative petitioners, highlighting the increasing interest in this sector. Additionally, there has been a rise in speculative zoning applications for data centers without a confirmed end user. Currently, there are ~3,000 acres of land in pivotal locations near the ComEd transmission station off of Eldamain Road that could support data center development. However, the City does not have specific regulations regarding intensive “Energy Industrial Uses” such as data center developments. To ensure responsible growth and maintain high development standards, it is crucial for the City to establish clear data center regulations that developers must follow. Research on Municipalities/Counties with Data Center Specified Regulations: As data center development continues to grow exponentially, many zoning ordinances across the United States do not yet explicitly address development standards for these uses. However, some municipalities are proactively updating their zoning regulations to accommodate the increasing demand. Loudoun County, Virginia—known as "Data Center Alley"—has the highest concentration of data centers in the world, with approximately 200 existing facilities and 117 more in development. To manage this rapid growth, on February 6, 2024, the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors directed staff to initiate a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPAM) and a Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOAM) to update policies and standards for data centers and electrical substations. The table below outlines various data center development standards implemented in Loudoun County. While Yorkville is not looking to adopt Loudoun County’s standards exactly, it aims to implement similar best practices tailored to the City’s specific needs. Notably, Loudoun County’s regulations do not include specific setbacks for commercial, public institutional, or school uses, which Yorkville intends to incorporate into its approach. Type of Standard Standard for Loudoun County, Virginia Landscape The plant unit composition requirements apply exclusively to buffer or road corridor buffer areas. The specifications are as follows: • Large Deciduous Trees: Up to 30% of the required plant units. • Small Deciduous Trees: Up to 30% of the Memorandum To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Sara Mendez, Planner I CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Lynn Dubajic, Economic Development Consultant Date: May 7, 2025 Subject: PZC 2025-05 Data Center Development Standards – Text Amendment 2 required plant units. • Evergreen Trees: A minimum of 40% and a maximum of 70% of the required plant units, with trees being at least 8 feet tall when planted. • Shrubs, Ornamental Grasses, and Perennials: Up to 20% of the required plant units. Minimum Building/Structure Setback 200 feet from the shared property line of a residential area only. Building separation from data center structure to residential No regulation in place. Maximum Building Height The maximum building height for data centers is determined by the zoning district. The following are the zoning districts data centers are permitted in and their maximum building height: 1. Industrial Park (IP): 100 feet 2. General Industry (GI): 100 feet 3. Mineral Resource – Heavy Industry (MR-HI): 45 feet Noise study A noise study is required. Generator Noise Testing Hours When adjacent to residential areas: 1. May 1st – September 30th 5pm-7pm 2. October 1st – April 30th 11am-5pm Light and Glare Data centers must include a photometric plan that shows all exterior lighting, including all security lighting. Maximum Illumination: lighting must not cause illumination in excess of 0.25 foot-candles above background light levels measured at the lot line of any adjacent lot or road right-of-way Nuclear Energy Possibly considering due to the high demand of data centers in Virginia. Specific Buffer and Berm Requirements Buffer Type C is required with the specified plantings and located on an earthen berm that has a minimum height of 6 feet and a grade lower than 2:1. Buffer Type C: Opaque, intended to provide the greatest degree of screening feasible and minimize visual contact between uses, creating a strong impression of total separation. 3 Prince William County, Virginia, is also a rapidly growing hub for data centers. As of February 2024, the county had at least 44 data center buildings totaling 8.3 million square feet. To encourage development in areas with existing infrastructure capable of supporting data centers, the county established the Data Center Opportunity Zone Overlay District. In Prince William County, data centers are permitted by right within the overlay district, as well as in various office, industrial, and manufacturing zoning districts. The table below outlines the standards established for the Data Center Opportunity Zone Overlay District: Type of Standard Standard for Prince William County, Virginia Screening of Mechanical Equipment Mechanical equipment must be screened from major roads and residential properties using a building, existing vegetation, or a visually solid fence, wall, or panel. Buffer Yard Requirement A buffer yard is required between data centers and adjacent residential properties. A six-foot earthen berm with Type C plantings must be installed unless existing topography, vegetation, or a six-foot solid fence provides equivalent screening. Type C: Designed to provide maximum screening, minimizing visual exposure between uses and creating a clear sense of separation. Fencing Chain-link and barbed wire fencing are prohibited along public and private streets. Permitted fencing includes Stalwart IS Anti-Ram Barrier & Impasse II, a high-security steel system with an integrated crash-rated barrier. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Increase Data centers within the Data Center Opportunity Zone Overlay District may have a FAR up to 1.0, provided all other development standards are met. Substations Must be screened from major roads and residential areas with 10-foot opaque fencing. Building Facades Near Historic District Buildings visible from the Manassas Battlefield Park must have non-reflective, dark green or brown facades to blend into the tree line. Chandler, Arizona has seen significant data center development, with notable facilities including H5 Data Centers’ Phoenix Data Center and Digital Realty’s Chandler Data Center. In December 2022, the City of Chandler modified its zoning code to define the location and operation of data centers. The zoning code took effect in January 2023. The table below outlines the standards established in Chandler’s Zoning Code to address data centers: 4 Type of Standard Standard for Chandler, Arizona Restriction on Data Center Operations Data Centers are not permitted to operate unless explicitly approved as part of a Planned Area Development zoning district. Data centers that are ancillary to another primary use are permitted if: 1. They occupy no more than 10% of the building footprint 2. They serve the enterprise function of the on- site property owner and are not used to lease data storage or processing services to third parties 3. They are not housed in a separate, stand-alone structure on the parcel Notification to Residents The data center operator or property owner must notify all residents and homeowners' associations within a 0.5-mile radius of the property about their intent to build and operate a data center. This notice must be mailed to all postal addresses and homeowners' association addresses within the specified radius from the property line of the proposed data center site. Neighborhood Meetings Data center operator must schedule and attend 2 neighborhood meetings with residents to describe the project and the proposed sound-mitigation aspects of the project design. Notice of the neighborhood meetings must be mailed to all residents and homeowner associations within a 0.5-mile radius of the parcel. A representative of the developer or owner with decision-making authority on the design of the data center must attend the neighborhood meetings. Data center operator or property owner must also post a sign on the subject property, at least 15 days before each neighborhood meeting. The sign must be located along an arterial street or other high-visibility location The sign must include the following: 1. The applicant’s name and contact information 2. Brief description of the data center project 3. Date, time, and location of the neighborhood meeting 5 Neighborhood Liaison Requirement After issuance of a certificate of occupancy and commencement of the operation of the data center, the operator of a data center must provide an on-site neighborhood liaison between the hours of 8am and 10pm MST each day to respond to complaints about noise emanating from the data center. Pre-Development Sound Study Requirement Before the first neighborhood meeting, the property owner proposing a data center must conduct a sound study by a third-party acoustic engineer to document baseline noise levels, including measurements at the property line of the nearest residentially zoned or noise-sensitive property. The property owner must provide a copy of the results of the study to the City of Chandler before the 1st neighborhood meeting. Post-Construction Noise Monitoring Requirements After receiving either a certificate of occupancy or a certificate of completion, the data center operator must conduct a noise study by a third-party acoustical engineer to document noise levels at the property line of the nearest residentially zoned or planned property during peak operation of the data center's mechanical equipment. Data center operator must conduct an additional noise study annually during peak operation of the data center mechanical equipment for 5 years after completion of the initial post-construction noise study. Data center operator must provide the results of the noise study to the City of Chandler within 30 days of the anniversary date on which the certificate of occupancy or certificate of completion was issued by the City. Backup Power Generator Notification Requirements If data center operator intends to use backup power generator, the operator must maintain a public website announcing the times when the generators will be in operation. Any routine operation of the backup generators, including for testing purposes, must be announced on the website 24 hours in advance. The operator must also notify the City of Chandler Communications and Public Affairs Department at least 24 hours in advance. Backup generators may operate between the hours of 6 9am and 5pm, Monday – Friday, excluding holidays. Data center operator must provide the address of the website where the notices required. Approved & Proposed Data Centers Since Yorkville identified data centers as permitted land uses in the M-2 General Manufacturing District in the Zoning Ordinance in 2023 and established a placeholder in the recently adopted Unified Development Ordinance for future development standards under Energy Industrial Uses , the City has experienced a growing interest in data center development. With the approval of Yorkville’s first data center project, Cyrus One in 2024, there has been a significant increase in speculative entitlement requests, including annexations and rezonings, for potential data center developments. This trend highlights the need for clearly defined standards to guide future projects and ensure alignment with the City’s long-term planning goals. The table and map below highlight twelve (12) data center projects that have been approved, are currently under review, or involve site inquiries with stated intentions to apply within the City of Yorkville: Development Name Acres Zoning Application Status Approval Status Nearest Distance to Residential Property Line Residential Subdivision Cyrus One 229 acres M-2 Limited Manufacturing District Applied Approved (PUD) (2024) ~2,230 feet Whispering Meadows Prologis (Project Steel) 557 acres Unincorporated Applied Pending (Annex, Rezone, & PUD) ~3,500 feet Caledonia Daniels (South) 267 acres M-2 Limited Manufacturing District Applied Approved (Annex & Rezone) (2025) ~130 feet Fox Hill Daniels (North) 64 acres A-1 Agricultural District Applied Pending (Annex & Rezone) ~98 feet Whispering Meadows Green Door – 50 acres 50 acres M-2 Limited Manufacturing District N/A Approved ~4,300 feet Caledonia Green Door - Hagemann 138 acres M-2 Limited Manufacturing District Applied Approved (Annex & Rezone) (2024) ~7,300 feet Caledonia Green Door – Kelaka 154 acres M-2 Limited Manufacturing District Applied Approved (Annex & Rezone) (2024) ~1,500 feet Kylyn’s Ridge Green Door – Meyer 130 acres R-4 General Multi- Family Residence District (Westbury South Village) Not Applied N/A ~0 feet* Caledonia 7 Hamman- Kelaka 109 acres B-3 General Business District/Unincorporated Applied Approved (Annex & Rezone) (2025) ~0 feet* Kylyn’s Ridge Magnolia Hill Partners 143 acres Unincorporated Not Applied N/A ~2,600 feet Autumn Creek Pioneer (Project Cardinal) 1,048 acres Planned Unit Development (PUD) (Westhaven & Bailey Meadows) Applied Pending (Annex, Rezone, & PUD) ~460 feet Bristol Bay PGP Development 127 acres Unincorporated Not Applied N/A ~650 feet Caledonia *Immediately adjacent to residential property line 8 The table below outlines the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) and data center projects, including those submitted without a land plan, and highlights the regulations each petitioner has agreed to follow per the applicable Planned Unit Development Agreement/Annexation Agreement. Development Name Regulations Agreed to be Followed Cyrus One 1. Building Setbacks: • Front Yard (Eldamain Road): 150-foot setback from the road’s right-of-way • Rear Yard (Beecher Road): 60-foot setback from the road’s right of way • Side Yard (north and south property lines): 50-foot setback 2. Parking: • .2 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet net floor area • Required to construct a minimum of 400 total spaces, including 10 electric vehicle (EV) charging spots. 3. Access to Subject Property: • 1 access point off Eldamain Road and 1 access off Faxon Road 4. Off-Street Loading: • No more than 1 loading space shall be required per building 5. Landscaping: • The developer must install landscaping along Eldamain, Faxon, and Beecher roadways that meets Transition Zone Type D Standards, while other internal landscaping requirements under UDO Section 10-5-3 are waived 6. Mechanical Screening and Fencing: • Must comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance (Title 4, Chapter 4. Noise Ordinance) 7. Appearance Standards: • Must submit updated building elevations with a final plat application or building permit request. 8. Lots; Street Design • Exempt from Section 10-7-2 and 10-7-3 in the UDO 9. Signage: • Must follow Section 10-6 (Sign Standards) in the UDO 10. Lighting: • Must submit photometric plan along with manufacturer’s cut sheet of proposed lighting standards installed in parking area Daniels (South) There are no zoning and land development regulations to follow due to the absence of a formal land plan. 9 Green Door - Hagemann There are no zoning and land development regulations to follow due to the absence of a formal land plan. Green Door – Kelaka There are no zoning and land development regulations to follow due to the absence of a formal land plan. Hamman- Kelaka 1. Building Restriction: • No buildings shall be erected on the property identified by Parcel Index Number 02-19-200-008. Surface parking, roads and stormwater management facilities shall be permitted on this parcel. 2. Data Center Building to Residential Structure: • No buildings shall be erected closer than 400 feet to nearest existing residential structure. 3. Landscape Buffer and Berm Requirement: • 100-foot landscaped buffer with an 8 foot tall berm shall be installed between the proposed data center and the Kylyn’s Ridge subdivision immediately adjacent and to the east of the Subject Property, and the homes located on Blackberry Shore Lane immediately adjacent and to the south of the Subject Property. This buffer shall include elements such as vegetation, solid fencing, green walls, stormwater management area, living groundcover, and turf to ensure effective visual screening and physical separation between land uses. 4. Building Height: • Any buildings located within 1,500 feet of a residential subdivision shall be no more than seventy (70) feet tall, including all rooftop equipment. 5. Equal Distance Restrictions for Adjacent Residential Areas: • Any distance restrictions on development at the Subject Property that provide a benefit for the Kylyn’s Ridge subdivision, including landscaped buffers, shall also be applied for the benefit of the homes along Blackberry Shore Lane immediately adjacent and to the south of the Subject Property. Proposed Text Amendments: As municipalities like Loudoun County, Prince William County, and the City of Chandler experience rapid data center growth, they have implemented zoning standards tailored to these developments. Similarly, the City of Yorkville is working to adopt specific data center regulations. Since identifying data centers as a permitted use in the M-2 General Manufacturing District in 2023, the City has approved its first Planned Unit Development for the Cyrus One data center. Additionally, there has been a rise in speculative entitlement requests, including annexations and rezonings, for potential data center projects. However, the City’s M-2 General Manufacturing District does not currently include specific development standards for data centers. To ensure responsible growth and maintain high development standards, it is crucial for the City to establish clear data center regulations that developers must follow. The table below compares the standards the City is considering implementing with the current M-2 General Manufacturing District standards and the City’s existing code: 10 Standard M-2 General Manufacturing District/ City Code Proposed Standards Landscape Buffer – when adjacent to non-manufacturing zoned land use Section 10-5-3 in the Unified Development Ordinance establishes landscape standards for new developments. The following landscape requirements would apply to data center developments: building foundation landscaping, parking area perimeter landscaping, parking area interior landscaping, and transition zone landscaping. Table 10-5-3(F)(2) Application of Transition Zone Types states Industrial land uses are required to utilize Transition Zone “D” landscape buffer when adjacent to the following land uses: single- family residential, all other residential, public/institutional, retail, service/medica/office, lodging, eating/drinking, entertainment, vehicle related, and industrial/transportation. The UDO states Type D has a Minimum Zone Width of 20 feet and the Minimum Fence/Wall height is 6 feet, which may also be satisfied with a solid evergreen hedge. The Minimum Number of Landscape Elements per 100 Linear Feet are as followed: 1. Understory Tree: 5 2. Canopy/Evergreen Tree: 5 3. Shrubs/Native Grasses: 35 In addition to Section 10-5-3 the following requirements will apply: Minimum of 100-foot landscape buffer when adjacent to any non- manufacturing zoned land use (i.e. residential, commercial, public institutional, school, etc.) 1. Landscape buffer shall be consistent with Transition Zone D in Section 10-5- 3.F of the Unified Development Ordinance 2. The buffer area shall be dedicated exclusively to dense landscaping, including trees and shrubs, and shall not be used for stormwater detention, roadways, walking trails, surface parking, or similar improvements. 3. Required 8-foot-tall berms when adjacent to residential subdivisions Discussion: 1. Is the City open to granting relief from the landscape standards or will applications be reviewed on a case- by-case basis? Landscape Buffer – Road Please refer to the Landscape Regulations above Minimum of a 100-foot landscape buffer along any public roadway 1. Landscape buffer shall be consistent with Transition Zone D in Section 10-5- 3.F of the Unified 11 Development Ordinance 2. The buffer area shall be dedicated exclusively to dense landscaping, including trees and shrubs, and shall not be used for stormwater detention, roadways, walking trails, surface parking, or similar improvements. Building separation The Unified Development Ordinance does not currently impose a minimum building separation requirement between a data center building or structure (primary or accessory) and the nearest residential or commercial structure. Minimum of a 500-foot building separation from the nearest data center building or structure (primary or accessory) to the nearest residential or commercial structure. Maximum Height Table 10-3-9(A) of the Unified Development Ordinance indicates that the M-2 General Manufacturing District currently has no maximum building height restriction. Maximum height for data centers within 1,500 feet of a residential structure shall be 70 feet including roof top mechanical equipment a. No rooftop mounted HVAC or other mechanical units are allowed within this buffer, unless specifically approved by City Council Discussion: 1. To be consistent with maximum height in other districts (B-1, B-2, and B- 3), will the city consider a maximum height of 80 feet if the data center is not within 1,500 feet of a residential structure? Noise Study Although the City does not have an explicit requirement for data centers to conduct a noise study, it engaged a sound engineer to evaluate the preliminary PUD for the now-approved Cyrus One data center—the City’s first Planned Unit Development for data center All applications for data centers shall provide a noise study which will be subject to review by the City’s sound engineering consultant 1. A pre-construction noise study shall include baseline noise 12 use—while considering the surrounding existing and future land uses. This evaluation served as the required noise study for the project. measurements of the current environment and predictive modeling in phased and at full buildout to ensure the facility’s design will meet local noise limits a. Consider sharing with the public or at least neighboring property owners for full transparency 2. Data center developers must include a mitigation plan in their noise study to ensure that operational noise does not exceed the pre-development baseline measured at the property. 3. All major mechanical equipment (generators, chillers, HVAC units) shall be fully enclosed or screened by solid barriers. If rooftop mechanical equipment is approved, they shall be enclosed in penthouses with sound dampening construction b. Backup generators and condensers shall be placed on the side of the building(s) or the opposite side of the facility, farthest from residential structures. Discussion: 1. Should the City implement an annual noise monitoring conducted by the City’s sound engineering consultant for 3 years after construction completion to verify ongoing noise compliance? 13 Operational Testing Based on the Table 1 Sound Level Limits in the Code of Ordinances (Chapter 4 Noise Ordinance), if a data center is located near a residential land use property, it must keep noise levels below 60 dBA during the day (7am-10pm) and below 50 dBA at night (10pm- 7pm). If a data center is located near a commercial or public parks and other open public space land use properties, it must keep noise level below 67dBA during the day (7am-10pm) and night time (10pm-7am). Operational testing of emergency backup generators shall be limited to between the hours of 11am to 5pm on weekdays only, non- holidays. Discussion: 1. The city may want to consider implementing strict noise limits for data centers at all receiving property land uses property ensuring they do not exceed the current Noise Ordinance 2. Does the City want to require lower dBA for residential land uses at night? 3. Additionally, the City is considering requiring operators to use the lowest-noise equipment available, such as hospital-grade mufflers on generators, to help minimize noise impacts on surrounding properties. Nuclear Energy There is currently no standard in place, but the City strongly opposes the use of nuclear energy. Data centers are strictly prohibited from using, generating, storing, or deploying nuclear energy as a power source within the City. This includes, but is not limited to, nuclear reactors, small modular reactors (SMRs), or any other nuclear-based technology. Phasing Plan There is currently no requirement for a phased construction plan in place for data centers to minimize impacts on residential structures. Implement a phased construction plan that minimizes impacts on residential structures by prioritizing initial development at the farthest distance from existing residential structures. Fencing Permitted Materials in the M-2 District: 1. Stone 2. Brick Fencing shall be security style aluminum, steel, wrought iron, or similar materials. Chain-link or barbed wire fencing is prohibited along public-facing 14 3. Natural rot resistant wood (cedar, cyprus, redwood) 4. Cast or wrought iron 5. Plastic 6. Aluminum 7. Composite wood and plastic 8. Vinyl coated chain-link (rear and side yard only in all zoning district) 9. Galvanized chain-link (only on M-1 and M-2 properties adjacent to other M-1 or M-2 property) The maximum height for fences in the manufacturing district is 8 feet for the front, corner side, interior side, and rear yard edges and properties adjacent to residential land uses. Lighting and Photometric Table 10-5-7(E) Outside Lighting Height Standards allows for manufacturing districts to have a maximum lighting height of 35 feet. Lighting and photometric plans must provide and adhere to Section 10-5-7. Outside Lighting of the Unified Development Ordinance. Discussion: 1. Table 10-5-7(E) Outside Lighting Height Standards allows for manufacturing districts to have a maximum lighting height of 35 feet. Should the City consider lowering the light pole standard maximum? Traffic Management Plan Section 10-A-10. Traffic Study in Unified Development Ordinance does not explicitly require a Traffic Management Plan, rather, it focuses on a Traffic Impact Study, which is an analysis of existing and projected traffic conditions. A Traffic Management Plan shall be required during construction, including a communication strategy and an on-site point of contact during construction. Battery Storage The battery storage standards require 4-hour fire wall protection and must not be adjacent to any combustible materials. Battery storage systems shall be located a minimum of 50 feet away from any adjacent structure and must be readily accessible by BKFD for firefighting efforts. 15 Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) Typically, high hazard uses in the City are required to have an Emergency Operations Plan (EOP). While the City has its own EOP, there is no specific requirement for data centers to have an individual Emergency Operations Plan Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) shall be submitted and approved by the City and Fire Protection District (BKFD) prior to issuance of a building permit and must include: 1. Procedures for fire suppression, hazardous material spills, evacuation, and communication in case of an incident 2. Training sessions/drill and or walkthroughs with fire and police shall be required prior to occupancy permit 3. Designated contacts for emergency services and a plan to broadcast information if an incident could affect the public 4. Must work with KenCom emergency managers to be part of text or siren alert systems Building Code Enhanced Standards The City has adopted the 2018 edition of the International Code Council (ICC), which includes provisions for energy storage. Installing advanced early fire detection in server rooms, using fire-resistive construction beyond code minimums on walls facing neighborhoods, or providing additional hazardous material safeguards. Compliance with NFPA 855 Appearance Standards Section 10-5-8. C.4 sets appearance guidelines and standards for industrial uses, which include the following: Guidelines: 1. At least 50% of the total building shall incorporate masonry products or precast concrete. The front facade, facing a street with the main entry, must be at least 50% masonry or 16 precast concrete, while any facade abutting a street must also include masonry or precast concrete. Masonry or precast concrete is encouraged on all remaining facades. When using precast concrete panels or split- face block, incorporating colors, patterns, or architectural features is encouraged. 2. Building entryways shall be clearly identified. Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves and parapets shall be in proportion to one another. 3. The location of parking lots in a manner that is logical, safe, and pedestrian friendly is encouraged. In this respect, the location of parking lots in the rear or side of a building is encouraged. Standards: 1. Industrial buildings shall consist of solid and durable facade materials and be compatible with the character and scale of the surrounding area. 2. Industrial buildings with facades greater than 100 feet in length shall incorporate recesses, projections, windows or other ornamental/architectural features along at least 30% of the length of the facade abutting a public street in an effort to break up the mass of the structure. 17 Lastly, through Ordinance 2023-30, the City defined "battery uses," "data centers," and "refrigerated warehouses (cold storage)" and established off-street parking regulations for these land uses. However, during the transition from the Zoning Ordinance to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), the table outlining off-street parking regulations was not incorporated, although was used in the calculations for determining minimum parking standards for Cyrus One. Staff is requesting to formally add the table below to the UDO to ensure these regulations are applied to data centers. Proposed Motion In consideration of testimony presented during a Public Hearing on May 14, 2025 and discussions conducted at that meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a request to amend Section 10-4-10, Energy Industrial Use Standards, of the Unified Development Ordinance to establish development regulations for data center facilities, as presented in a staff memorandum dated May 7, 2025 and further subject to {insert any additional conditions of the Planning and Zoning Commission}… Attachments 1. Proposed Amendments to Section 10-4-10 Energy Industrial Use Standards 2. Ordinance 2023-30 3. Public Hearing Notice Affidavit Use Minimum Spaces Required Energy Industrial Uses: Battery Storage: Less than 70,000 square feet Minimum of 20 parking spaces More than 70,001 square feet 0.3 per 1,000 square feet of floor area Data Center: Less than 70,000 square feet Minimum of 20 parking spaces More than 70,001 square feet 0.3 per 1,000 square feet of floor area Refrigerated Warehouse (Cold Storage) Less than 150,000 square feet 0.5 per 1,000 square feet of floor area More than 150,001 square feet 0.3 per 1,000 square feet of floor area. 10-4-10. Energy Industrial Uses A. Landscape Buffer – when adjacent to non-manufacturing zoned land use 1. In addition to Section 10-5-3 the following requirements apply: a. Minimum of 100 foot-landscape buffer when adjacent to non-manufacturing zoned land use (i.e. residential, commercial, school, public institutional, etc.). b. The buffer area shall be dedicated exclusively to dense landscaping, including trees and shrubs, and shall not be used for stormwater detention, roadways, walking trails, surface parking, or similar improvements. c. Required 8-foot-tall berms when adjacent to residential subdivisions. B. Landscape Buffer – when adjacent to roads 1. Minimum of a 100-foot landscape buffer along any public roadway . a. Landscape buffer shall be consistent with Transition Zone D in Section 10-5-3.F. b. The buffer area shall be dedicated exclusively to dense landscaping, including trees and shrubs, and shall not be used for stormwater detention, roadways, walking trails, surface parking, or similar improvements. C. Building Separation 1. Minimum of a 500-foot building separation from the nearest data center building or structure (primary or accessory) to the nearest residential or commercial structure. D. Maximum Height 1. Maximum height for data centers within 1,500 feet of a residential structure shall be 70 feet including rooftop mechanical equipment. a. No rooftop mounted HVAC or other mechanical units are allowed within this buffer, unless specifically approved by City Council. E. Noise Study 1. All applications for data centers shall provide a noise study which will be subject to review by the City’s sound engineering consultant. 2. The noise study must include the following: a. A pre-construction noise study shall include baseline noise measurements of the current environment and predictive modeling in phased and at full buildout to ensure the facility’s design will meet local noise limits as detailed in Title 4, Chapter 4 of Yorkville’s Code of Ordinances. b. Data center developers must include a mitigation plan in their noise study to ensure that operational noise does not exceed the pre-development baseline measured at the property. c. All major mechanical equipment (i.e generators, chillers, HVAC units) shall be fully enclosed or screened by solid barriers. If rooftop mechanical equipment is approved, they shall be enclosed in penthouses with sound dampening construction. i. Backup generators and condensers shall be placed on the side of the building(s) or the opposite side of the facility, farthest from residential structures. 3. An annual noise monitoring will be conducted by the City’s sound engineering consultant for 3 years after construction completion to verify ongoing noise compliance. F. Operational Testing 1. Operational testing of emergency backup generators shall be limited to between the hours of 11am to 5pm on weekdays only, non-holidays. G. Nuclear Energy 1. Data centers are strictly prohibited from using, generating, storing, or deploying nuclear energy as a power source within the City. This includes, but is not limited to, nuclear reactors, small modular reactors (SMRs), or any other nuclear-based energy. H. Phasing Plan 1. Implement a phased construction plan that minimizes impacts on residential structures by prioritizing initial development at the farthest distance from existing residential structures. I. Fencing 1. Fencing shall be security style aluminum, steel, wrought iron, or similar materials. 2. Chain-link or barbed wire fencing is prohibited along public facing edges and properties adjacent to residential land uses. J. Lighting and Photometric 1. Lighting and photometric plans must be submitted at the time of application and adhere to Section 10-5-7 Outside Lighting. K. Traffic Management Plan 1. A Traffic Management Plan shall be required during construction, including a communication strategy and an on-site point of contact during construction. L. Battery Storage 1. Battery storage systems shall be located a minimum of 50 feet away from any adjacent structure and must be readily accessible by Bristol Kendal Fire Protection District (BKFD) for firefighting efforts. M. Emergency Operations Plan 1. Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) shall be submitted and approved by the City and the Bristol Kendal Fire Protection District (BKFD) prior to issuance of a building permit and must include: a. Procedures for fire suppression, hazardous material spills, evacuation, and communication in case of an incident. b. Training sessions/drills and or walkthroughs with fire and police shall be required prior to occupancy permit. c. Designated contacts for emergency services and a plan to broadcast information if an incident could affect the public. d. Must work with KenCom emergency managers to be part of text or siren alert systems. N. Building Code Enhanced Standards 1. Installing advanced early fire detection in server rooms, using fire-resistive construction beyond code minimums on walls facing neighborhoods, or providing additional hazardous material safeguards. 2. Compliance with National Fire Protection Association 855. O. Appearance Standards 1. Appearance standards shall comply with the requirements outlined in Section 10-5-8.4. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 2023-30 ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE IDENTIFY, DEFINE, AND REGULATE ENERGY INDUSTRIAL USES Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County,Illinois This 26" day of September, 2023 Published in pamphlet form by the authority of the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois on September 27, 2023. Ordinance No. 2023-30 AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE IDENTIFY, DEFINE, AND REGULATE ENERGY INDUSTRIAL USES WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10-4-10 of the United City of Yorkville Zoning Ordinance ("Zoning Ordinance") the City may initiate amendments to the Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the City filed a petition seeking an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to identify Energy Industrial Uses as uses consisting of "battery uses", "data centers" and refrigerated warehouses (cold storage") as their own line items in Table 10.06.04 Manufacturing Uses; and, WHEREAS, the City filed a petition seeking an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to define "battery uses", "data center", and "refrigerated warehouse (cold storage)" as permitted uses within the M-1 and M-2 zoning districts; and, WHEREAS, the City filed a petition seeking an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to add off-street parking regulations for Energy Industrial Uses in Section Table 10.16.03 regarding battery uses, data centers, and refrigerated warehouses (cold storage), to reflect the proposed new definitions; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission convened and held a public hearing on September 13, 2023, to consider each of these requests and made findings of fact and recommendations to the City Council to approve all of the requested text amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Ordinance No. 2023-30 Page 2 Section 1: That the above recitals are hereby incorporated and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 2: That a Section 10-2-3 of the United City of Yorkville Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to add the following definitions: BATTERY STORAGE USES: A use that enables battery manufacturing, charging, recycling, warehousing, storage, and related uses. This may also include uses that derive energy from renewable sources, such as wind and solar power, to be collected, stored, and then released for later use to an electric grid, power plant or private user. DATA CENTER: A facility comprised of networked computers, storage systems, and computing infrastructure which organizations use to assemble, process, store and disseminate data. Cryptocurrency centers, which use networked computers, storage systems, and computing infrastructure to manage the flow of digital or virtual currencies, shall be included in the definition. REFRIGERATED WAREHOUSE (COLD STORAGE): A facility which is artificially or mechanically cooled in order to maintain the integrity and quality of perishable goods. Section 3: That a Section 10-6-0, Table 10.06.04 of the United City of Yorkville Zoning Ordinance to add the land uses as follows: a o Qm z to oy o7 to O N W N Battery Storage Uses P P Data Center P P Refrigerated Warehouse(Cold Storage) P P Section 4: That a Section 10-16-3-F, Table 10.16.03 of the United City of Yorkville Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to add language regulating off-street parking for the land uses as follows: Ordinance No. 2023-30 Page 3 Use I Minimum Spaces Required Energy Industrial Uses: Battery Storage Less than 70,000 square feet Minimum 20 parking spaces More than 70,001 square feet 0.3 per 1,000 square feet of floor area Data Center Less than 70,000 square feet Minimum 20 parking spaces More than 70,001 square feet 0.3 per 1,000 square feet of floor area Refrigerated Warehouse (Cold Storage) Less than 150,000 square feet 0.5 per 1,000 square feet of floor area More than 150,001 square feet 0.3 per 1,000 square feet of floor area Section 5: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its passage, publication, and approval as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this 26th day of September, A.D. 2023. CITY CLERK KEN KOCH ABSENT DAN TRANSIER AYE ARDEN JOE PLOCHER AYE CRAIG SOLING AYE CHRIS FUNKHOUSER AYE MATT MAREK AYE SEAVER TARULIS AYE RUSTY CORNEILS AYE APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of j' , A.D. 2023. MAYOR Ordinance No.2023-30 Page 4 Sold To: United City of Yorkville - CU00410749 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville,IL 60560 Bill To: United City of Yorkville - CU00410749 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville,IL 60560 Certificate of Publication: Order Number: 7802242 Purchase Order: PZC 2025-05: Data Center Text State of Illinois - Kane Chicago Tribune Media Group does hereby certify that it is the publisher of the The Beacon-News. The The Beacon-News is a secular newspaper, has been continuously published Daily for more than fifty (50) weeks prior to the first publication of the attached notice, is published in the City of Aurora, Township of Aurora, State of Illinois, is of general circulation throughout that county and surrounding area, and is a newspaper as defined by 715 IL CS 5/5. This is to certify that a notice, a true copy of which is attached, was published 1 time(s) in the The Beacon-News, namely one time per week or on 1 successive weeks. The first publication of the notice was made in the newspaper, dated and published on 4/25/2025, and the last publication of the notice was made in the newspaper dated and published on 4/25/2025. This notice was also placed on a statewide public notice website as required by 715 ILCS 5/2. 1. PUBLICATION DATES: Apr 25, 2025. ___________________________________________________________________________________ The Beacon-News In witness, an authorized agent of The Chicago Tribune Media Group has signed this certificate executed in Chicago, Illinois on this 28th Day of April, 2025, by Chicago Tribune Media Group Jeremy Gates Chicago Tribune - chicagotribune.com 160 N Stetson Avenue, Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 222-2222 - Fax: (312) 222-4014 Chicago Tribune - chicagotribune.com 160 N Stetson Avenue, Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 222-2222 - Fax: (312) 222-4014 10-4-10. Energy Industrial Uses A. Landscape Buffer – when adjacent to non-manufacturing zoned land use 1. In addition to Section 10-5-3 the following requirements apply: a. Minimum of 100 foot-landscape buffer when adjacent to non-manufacturing zoned land use (i.e. residential, commercial, school, public institutional, etc.). b. The buffer area shall be dedicated exclusively to dense landscaping, including trees and shrubs, and shall not be used for stormwater detention, roadways, walking trails, surface parking, or similar improvements. c. Required 8-foot-tall berms when adjacent to residential subdivisions. B. Landscape Buffer – when adjacent to roads 1. Minimum of a 100-foot landscape buffer along any public roadway . a. Landscape buffer shall be consistent with Transition Zone D in Section 10-5-3.F. b. The buffer area shall be dedicated exclusively to dense landscaping, including trees and shrubs, and shall not be used for stormwater detention, roadways, walking trails, surface parking, or similar improvements. C. Building Separation 1. Minimum of a 500-foot building separation from the nearest data center building or structure (primary or accessory) to the nearest residential or commercial structure. D. Maximum Height 1. Maximum height for data centers within 1,500 feet of a residential structure shall be 70 feet including rooftop mechanical equipment. a. The use of rooftop mounted HVAC or other mechanical units shall require the approval of City Council. E. Noise Study 1. All applications for data centers shall provide a noise study which will be subject to review by the City’s sound engineering consultant. 2. The noise study must include the following: a. A pre-construction noise study shall include baseline noise measurements of the current environment and predictive modeling in phased and at full buildout to ensure the facility’s design will meet local noise limits as detailed in Title 4, Chapter 4 of Yorkville’s Code of Ordinances. b. Data center developers must include a mitigation plan in their noise study to ensure that operational noise does not exceed the local noise limits detailed in Yorkville’s Code of Ordinances. c. All major mechanical equipment (i.e generators, chillers, HVAC units) shall be fully enclosed or screened by solid barriers. If rooftop mechanical equipment is approved, they shall be enclosed in penthouses with sound dampening construction. i. Backup generators and condensers shall be placed on the side of the building(s) or the facility, that is farthest from residential structures. 3. An annual noise monitoring will be conducted by the City’s sound engineering consultant for 3 years after construction completion to verify ongoing noise compliance. F. Operational Testing 1. Operational testing of emergency backup generators shall be limited to between the hours of 11am to 5pm on weekdays only, non-holidays. G. Nuclear Energy 1. Data centers are strictly prohibited from using, generating, storing, or deploying nuclear energy as a power source within the City. This includes, but is not limited to, nuclear reactors, small modular reactors (SMRs), or any other nuclear-based energy. H. Phasing Plan 1. Implement a phased construction plan that minimizes impacts on residential structures by prioritizing initial development at the farthest distance from existing residential structures. I. Fencing 1. Fencing shall be security style aluminum, steel, wrought iron, or similar materials. 2. Chain-link or barbed wire fencing is prohibited along public facing edges and properties adjacent to residential land uses. J. Lighting and Photometric 1. Lighting and photometric plans must be submitted at the time of application and adhere to Section 10-5-7 Outside Lighting. K. Traffic Management Plan 1. A Traffic Management Plan shall be required during construction, including a communication strategy and an on-site point of contact during construction. L. Battery Storage 1. Battery storage systems shall be located a minimum of 50 feet away from any adjacent structure and must be readily accessible by Bristol Kendal Fire Protection District (BKFD) for firefighting efforts. M. Emergency Operations Plan 1. Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) shall be submitted and approved by the City and the Bristol Kendal Fire Protection District (BKFD) prior to issuance of a building permit and must include: a. Procedures for fire suppression, hazardous material spills, evacuation, and communication in case of an incident. b. The location of any battery storage systems. c. Training sessions/drills and or walkthroughs with fire and police shall be required prior to occupancy permit. d. Designated contacts for emergency services and a plan to broadcast information if an incident could affect the public. e. Must work with KenCom emergency managers to be part of text or siren alert systems. N. Building Code Enhanced Standards 1. Installing advanced early fire detection in server rooms, using fire-resistive construction beyond code minimums on walls facing neighborhoods, or providing additional hazardous material safeguards. 2. Compliance with National Fire Protection Association 855. O. Appearance Standards 1. Appearance standards shall comply with the requirements outlined in Section 10-5-8.4. Sold To: United City of Yorkville - CU00410749 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville,IL 60560 Bill To: United City of Yorkville - CU00410749 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville,IL 60560 Certificate of Publication: Order Number: 7802242 Purchase Order: PZC 2025-05: Data Center Text State of Illinois - Kane Chicago Tribune Media Group does hereby certify that it is the publisher of the The Beacon-News. The The Beacon-News is a secular newspaper, has been continuously published Daily for more than fifty (50) weeks prior to the first publication of the attached notice, is published in the City of Aurora, Township of Aurora, State of Illinois, is of general circulation throughout that county and surrounding area, and is a newspaper as defined by 715 IL CS 5/5. This is to certify that a notice, a true copy of which is attached, was published 1 time(s) in the The Beacon-News, namely one time per week or on 1 successive weeks. The first publication of the notice was made in the newspaper, dated and published on 4/25/2025, and the last publication of the notice was made in the newspaper dated and published on 4/25/2025. This notice was also placed on a statewide public notice website as required by 715 ILCS 5/2. 1. PUBLICATION DATES: Apr 25, 2025. ___________________________________________________________________________________ The Beacon-News In witness, an authorized agent of The Chicago Tribune Media Group has signed this certificate executed in Chicago, Illinois on this 28th Day of April, 2025, by Chicago Tribune Media Group Jeremy Gates Chicago Tribune - chicagotribune.com 160 N Stetson Avenue, Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 222-2222 - Fax: (312) 222-4014 Chicago Tribune - chicagotribune.com 160 N Stetson Avenue, Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 222-2222 - Fax: (312) 222-4014 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Purchasing Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #8 Tracking Number EDC 2025-43 PZC 2025-04 Comprehensive Plan Update – Future Land Use Amendment Economic Development Committee – June 3, 2025 Approval Details an update to the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use map for approved developments. David Hansen Community Development Name Department Majority 1 Item Update: At the May 6, 2025 Economic Development Committee meeting, the following item was not discussed due to a lack of quorum. Upon recommendation by the City Council, the item was authorized to proceed to the Planning and Zoning Commission as originally scheduled. At the May 14, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, a public hearing was held for the item. As a result, there were no public comments and no further questions from the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Commission unanimously recommended approval to amend the Yorkville Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map with the proposed text amendment. Since the item has not been discussed at an Economic Development Committee meeting, this item is being brought back to the June 3, 2025 Economic Development Committee to ensure the Committee has the opportunity to provide any suggestions prior to City Council consideration. PLANNING & ZONING ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan on May 14, 2025. The commission made the following action on the motion for the request below: In consideration of testimony presented during a Public Hearing on May 14, 2025 and discussions conducted at that meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a request to amend the Yorkville Comprehensive Plan, including a modified future land use map, pursuant to Section 11-12-7 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/11-12-7) and Section 9-1-1 of the Yorkville City Code. The proposed amendment adds sections the Future Land Use – Map Addendum to reclassify eleven (11) identified developments. The changes are a result of a rezoning approvals made by the City Council in calendar years 2023 and 2024. Action Item: Linnane – aye; Green – aye; Williams – aye; Crouch – aye; Vinyard – aye; Forristall – aye. 6 ayes; 0 nays ATTACHMENTS: 1. PZC Staff Memo dated May 14, 2025 2. Proposed Appendix Amendment Pages 3. Public Hearing Notice Affidavit Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: David Hansen, Senior Planner CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Sara Mendez, Senior Planner Date: June 3, 2025 Subject: PZC 2025-04:Comprehensive Plan Update – Future Land Use Amendments 1 Summary In 2024, the City Council approved ten (10) developments, which required rezoning. Due to the inconsistency of the parcels with the adopted Comprehensive Plan Update of 2016, the future land use designations and maps of each area requires amending. Staff is recommending amending the plan to change the future land uses of these projects to their now approved land use. It is important to make these changes to ensure the plan is consistent with the approved use or current built environment and is not interpreted incorrectly within the planning horizon of the document. A list of these developments can be found in the table below. New Leaf Energy Solar Farm, approved in 2023, is also part of the list since it was not included in the amendment list in 2024. Project Current Comp Plan Future Land Use Designation Proposed Comprehensive Future Land Use Designation PZC 2022-24 New Leaf Energy Solar Farm Metra Station Transit-Oriented Development and Estate/Conservation Residential Agricultural Zone (AZ) PZC 2024-01 Yorkville Renewable Solar (Nexamp) Estate/Conservation Residential Agricultural Zone (AZ) PZC 2024-03 1.5 Mile Review for 8115 IL Route 47 (Grainco FS, Inc. & A.B. Schwartz) Estate/Conservation Residential and Agricultural Zone General Industrial (GI) PZC 2024-05 Corneils Road Solar Estate/Conservation Residential Agricultural Zone (AZ) PZC 2024-07 Kelaka / Green Door Capital Estate/Conservation Residential General Industrial (GI) PZC 2024-09 1.5 Mile Review for 1520 Cannonball Trail (Fox Valley Family YMCA) Estate/Conservation Residential and Agricultural Zone Destination Commercial (DC) PZC 2024-11 1.5 Mile Review for 7789 IL Route 47 (Jerry Styrczula / A&D Properties) Estate/Conservation Residential and Agricultural Zone General Industrial (GI) Memorandum To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: David Hansen, Senior Planner CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Sara Mendez, Senior Planner Date: May 14, 2025 Subject: PZC 2025-04:Comprehensive Plan Update – Future Land Use Amendments 2 PZC 2024-26 DMYF, LLLP (Daniels, Malinski Yorkville Family) Suburban Neighborhoods General Industrial (GI) PZC 2024-29 1115, LLC (Fox Haven Multi- Family Residential Townhome Development) Commercial Office Mid-Density Residential (MDR) PZC 2024-31 Hamman – Kelaka, LLC Estate/Conservation Residential General Industrial (GI) PZC 2024-33 Costco Wholesale Warehouse Mid Density Residential Destination Commercial (DC) Proposed Amendments The following is a summary of the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Update staff is recommending for each development as well as map images proposed for the amended Future Land Use map in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. PZC 2022-24: New Leaf Energy Solar Farm Current Future Land Use: Metra Station Transit-Oriented Development and Estate/Conservation Residential Proposed Future Land Use: Agricultural Zone 3 Summary: An application was submitted requesting annexation, rezoning, and special use permit approval to construct a 5- megawatt (MW) alternating current (AC) freestanding community solar farm located immediately north of the BNSF railroad line and east of Beecher Road. The 48-acre farmland property consists of three parcels, which 19 of the acres will be used for a solar farm. The parcels were annexed to the City’s default R-1 Single Family Suburban Residential zoning and were rezoned to A-1 Agricultural District. Amendment: The property was originally designated as “Metra Station Transit-Oriented Development”, which is intended to guide future development for the City’s two potential Metra train station districts. One of the three parcels was also originally designated as “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. The “Agricultural Zone” designation is meant for general farming uses. Changing this property’s designation to “Agricultural Zone” is consistent with the A-1 Agriculture zoning and the approved solar farm land use. PZC 2024-01: Yorkville Renewable Solar (Nexamp) Current Future Land Use: Estate/Conservation Residential Proposed Future Land Use: Agricultural Zone (AZ) Summary: An application was submitted requesting rezoning, special use, and variance authorization to construct a 5-megawatt (MW) freestanding community solar facility located near the southwest corner of Galena Road and Route 47 within the former East Westbury Village Planned Unit Development (PUD). The property is currently utilized for farming. The property was rezoned R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District to the A-1 Agricultural District. Amendment: The property was originally designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. The “Agricultural Zone” designation is meant for general farming uses. Changing this property’s designation to “Agricultural Zone” is consistent with the A-1 Agriculture zoning and the approved solar farm land use. 4 PZC 2024-03: 1.5 Mile Review for 8115 IL Route 47 (Grainco FS, Inc. & A.B. Schwartz) Current Future Land Use: Estate/Conservation Residential and Agricultural Zone Proposed Future Land Use: General Industrial (GI) Summary: An application was submitted requesting rezoning and an amendment to Kendall County’s Future Land Use Map from A- 1 Agricultural District to M-1 Limited Manufacturing District located at 8115 IL Route 47 for the purpose of operating a tile business, offices, warehouses, fuel storage, and other light industrial uses within existing structures. The property is approximately 20 acres in size and is located within one and a half miles of the planning boundary for Yorkville, allowing the city the opportunity to review and provide comments to Kendall County. Amendment: The property was originally designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. Part of the property was also originally designated “Agricultural Zone”, which is meant for general farming uses. The “General Industrial” designation is meant to accommodate a broad range of warehousing, manufacturing, and energy/industrial land uses. Changing this property’s designation to “General Industrial” is consistent with the County’s M-1 zoning and the approved industrial land use. PZC 2024-05: Corneils Road Solar Current Future Land Use: Estate/Conservation Residential Proposed Future Land Use: Agricultural Zone (AZ) 5 Summary: An application was submitted requesting annexation, rezoning, and special use permit approval to construct a 5-megawatt (MW) alternating current (AC) freestanding community solar farm located immediately north of Corneils Road, east of Beecher Road and west of IL Route 47 (N. Bridge Street). The 94-acre existing farmland property, which 31 acres will be used for a solar farm, was annexed to the City’s default R-1 Single Family Suburban Residential zoning and was rezoned to A-1 Agricultural District. Amendment: The property was originally designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. The “Agricultural Zone” designation is meant for general farming uses. Changing this property’s designation to “Agricultural Zone” is consistent with the A-1 Agriculture zoning and the approved solar farm land use. PZC 2024-07: Kelaka / Green Door Capital Current Future Land Use: Estate/Conservation Residential Proposed Future Land Use: General Industrial (GI) Summary: An application was submitted requesting annexation and rezoning approximately 148-acres of unincorporated farmland generally located south of the Burlington Santa Fe railroad line, just southeast of Faxon Road for the purpose of constructing and operating a future industrial/data center land use. The subject property consists of a portion of an existing 191-acre parcel. The property was rezoned R-1 Single-Family Suburban Residential District to M-2 General Manufacturing District. Amendment: The property was originally designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. The “General Industrial” designation is meant to accommodate a broad range of warehousing, manufacturing, and energy/industrial land uses. Changing this property’s designation to “General Industrial” is consistent with the M-2 General Manufacturing zoning and future industrial / data center land use. 6 PZC 2024-09: 1.5 Mile Review for 1520 Cannonball Trail (Fox Valley Family YMCA) Current Future Land Use: Estate/Conservation Residential and Agricultural Zone Proposed Future Land Use: Destination Commercial (DC) Summary: An application was submitted requesting site plan approval to construct a YMCA recreational facility, parking, and related infrastructure to a property at 1520 Cannonball Trail in Bristol Township. The property is approximately 25.8 acres and is located within one and a half miles of the planning boundary for Yorkville, allowing the city the opportunity to review and provide comments to Kendall County. Amendment: The property was originally designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. Part of the property was also originally designated “Agricultural Zone”, which is meant for general farming uses. The “Destination Commercial” is intended for a broad range of commercial activities ranging from large format retail and strip centers to hotels and recreational complexes. Changing this property’s designation to “Destination Commercial” is consistent with the County’s B-4 zoning and the approved recreational facility land use. PZC 2024-11: 1.5 Mile Review for 7789 IL Route 47 (Jerry Styrczula / A&D Properties) Current Future Land Use: Estate/Conservation Residential and Agricultural Zone Proposed Future Land Use: General Industrial (GI) Summary: An application was submitted requesting rezoning from B-3 Highway Business District to M-1 Limited Manufacturing District located at 7789 IL Route 47 to operate a trucking business for the sale and storage of semi-trailers, small trailers, semi-tractors, and similar uses at the subject property. The property is approximately 16.4 acres and is located within one 7 and a half miles of the planning boundary for Yorkville, allowing the city the opportunity to review and provide comments to Kendall County. Amendment: The property was originally designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. Part of the property was also originally designated “Agricultural Zone”, which is meant for general farming uses. The “General Industrial” designation is meant to accommodate a broad range of warehousing, manufacturing, and energy/industrial land uses. Changing this property’s designation to “General Industrial” is consistent with the County’s M-1 zoning and the approved industrial land use. PZC 2024-26: DMYF, LLLP (Daniels, Malinski Yorkville Family) Current Future Land Use: Suburban Neighborhoods and Estate/Conservation Residential Proposed Future Land Use: General Industrial (GI) Summary: An application was submitted requesting annexation and rezoning approximately 270-acres of unincorporated farmland generally north of US 34 (Veterans Parkway), west of Beecher Road and Kendall Marketplace, and approximately 850 feet east of Eldamain Road for the purpose of constructing and operating a future industrial/data center land use. The property was rezoned R-1 Single-Family Suburban Residential District to M-2 General Manufacturing District. Amendment: The property was originally designated “Suburban Neighborhood”, which is meant to provide single family detached housing options in traditional subdivision layouts. Part of the property was also designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single- family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. The “General Industrial” designation is meant to accommodate a broad range of warehousing, manufacturing, and energy/industrial land uses. Changing this property’s designation to “General Industrial” is consistent with the M-2 General Manufacturing zoning and future industrial / data center land use. 8 PZC 2024-29: 1115, LLC (Fox Haven Multi-Family Residential Townhome Development) Current Future Land Use: Commercial Office Proposed Future Land Use: Mid-Density Residential (MDR) Summary: An application was submitted requesting rezoning the 13-acre parcel from R-1 Single-Family Suburban Residence District to R-4 General Multi-Family Residence District for the purpose of developing a townhome community, known as Fox Haven, with 18 buildings totaling 105 townhome units located at 1115 South Bridge Street. The one-acre parcel fronting S Bridge Street will remain zoned as B-3 General Business District, with plans for a future commercial development and is not part of the amendment The property was formally occupied by the Parfection Park which included a golf range, batting cages, and mini golf outdoor entertainment venue which closed in October 2017. Amendment: The property was originally designated “Commercial Office”, which is meant to provide commercial, office, and retail space along the City’s main commercial corridors including Route 47 and Route 34. The “Mid-Density Residential” designation is meant to provide higher density residential developments near commercial areas which include a variety of housing options. Changing this property’s designation to “Mid-Density Residential” is consistent with the R-4 zoning and the approved multi-family residential land use. PZC 2024-31: Hamman – Kelaka, LLC Current Future Land Use: Estate/Conservation Residential Proposed Future Land Use: General Industrial (GI) 9 Summary: An application was submitted requesting annexation and rezoning. The annexation request involves two parcels totaling approximately 62.54 acres, located south of Faxon Road and west of Iroquois Lane, which are currently undeveloped and used for farming.Additionally, the rezoning request is for three parcels totaling approximately 112.44 acres. The three parcels include the two annexation related parcels and one parcel north of West Veterans Parkway (US 34) and east of Eldamain Road, which is already located within City limits. The two northern parcels were rezoned from R-1 Single- Family Suburban Residential District to M-2 General Manufacturing District and the one parcel within City limits along US 34 was rezoned from B-3 General Business District to M-2 General Manufacturing District to accommodate future uses consistent with a proposed data center development. Amendment: All three parcels were originally designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. The “General Industrial” designation is meant to accommodate a broad range of warehousing, manufacturing, and energy/industrial land uses. Changing this property’s designation to “General Industrial” is consistent with the M-2 General Manufacturing zoning and future industrial / data center land use. PZC 2024-33: Costco Wholesale Warehouse Current Future Land Use: Mid Density Residential Proposed Future Land Use: Destination Commercial (DC) Summary: An application was submitted requesting a PUD amendment, special use, and final plat to develop a members-only retail store spanning approximately 160,000 square feet and to establish and operate a standalone fueling facility generally located north of Veteran’s Parkway, east of McHugh Road, and southwest of East Countryside Parkway. The project is considered a major PUD amendment and would amend the Yorkville Crossing PUD. Additionally, the property’s existing B-3 zoning classification will remain unchanged. Amendment: The property was originally designated “Mid-Density Residential”, which is meant to provide higher density residential developments near commercial areas which include a variety of housing options. The “Destination Commercial” is intended for a broad range of commercial activities ranging from large format retail and strip centers to hotels and recreational complexes. Changing this property’s designation to “Destination Commercial” is consistent with the B-3 zoning and the approved large retail store and fueling facility land use. Staff Comments The Comprehensive Plan land use map is a guide to future development and zoning decisions, but it is also meant to be adjusted when circumstances warrant a change in planning direction in a given area of 10 the City. The changes to these areas have already been decided by the City Council and it is appropriate to change their corresponding land use designations. Proposed Motion In consideration of testimony presented during a Public Hearing on May 14, 2025 and discussions conducted at that meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a request to amend the Yorkville Comprehensive Plan, including a modified future land use map, pursuant to Section 11-12-7 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/11-12-7) and Section 9-1-1 of the Yorkville City Code. The proposed amendment adds sections the Future Land Use – Map Addendum to reclassify eleven (11) identified developments. The changes are a result of a rezoning approvals made by the City Council in calendar years 2023 and 2024. Attachments 1. Proposed Appendix Amendment Pages 2. Public Hearing Notice Affidavit SECTION 9 - STEWARDSHIP AND IMPLEMENTATION189THE YORKVILLE PLAN • CONNECTING OUR PAST TO THE FUTUREFUTURE LAND USE - MAP ADDENDUMSNORTHPOINTE DEVELOPMENTNew Future Land Use Designation: Mid-Density Residential Summary:In 2023, an application was approved requesting rezoning and variance to construct a three-story 48-unit senior living apartment complex at the southeast intersection of Sycamore Road and Route 34. The 3.43-acre property was originally zoned B-3 General Business District and was rezoned to R-4 General Multi-Family Residence District. The variance request was to increase the density permitted in the R-4 District from eight (8) dwelling units per acre to fourteen (14) dwelling units per acre. The “Mid-Density Residential” designation is meant to provide higher density residential developments near commercial areas which include a variety of housing options. The “Neighborhood Retail” designation is meant for smaller-scaled commercial developments located in close proximity to nearby residential neighborhoods and subdivisions, primarily focused on convenience type retail. The original “Neighborhood Retail” designation reflected the former B-3 zoning. The proposed “Mid-Density Residential” land use is better suited to the approved senior living apartment development.NEW LEAF ENERGY SOLAR FARMNew Future Land Use Designation: Agricultural ZoneSummary:In 2023, an application wasapproved requesting annexation, rezoning, and special use permit approval to construct a 5-megawatt (MW) alternating current (AC) freestanding community solar farm located immediately north of the BNSF railroad line and east of Beecher Road. The 48-acre farmland property consists of three parcels, which 19 of the acres will be used for a solar farm. The parcels were annexed to the City’s default R-1 Single Family Suburban Residential zoning and were rezoned to A-1 Agricultural District. The property was originally designated as “Metra Station Transit-Oriented Development”, which is intended to guide future development for the City’s two potential Metra train station districts. One of the three parcels was also originally designated as “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. The “Agricultural Zone” designation is meant for general farming uses. Changing this property’s designation to “Agricultural Zone” is consistent with the A-1 Agriculture zoning and the approved solar farm land use.YORKVILLE RENEWABLE SOLAR (NEXAMP)New Future Land Use Designation: Agricultural ZoneSummary:In 2024, an application was approved requesting rezoning, special use, and variance authorization to construct a 5-megawatt (MW) freestanding community solar facility located near the southwest corner of Galena Road and Route 47 within the former East Westbury Village Planned Unit Development (PUD). The property is currently utilized for farming. The property was rezoned R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District to the A-1 Agricultural District. The property was originally designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. The “Agricultural Zone” designation is meant for general farming uses. Changing this property’s designation to “Agricultural Zone” is consistent with the A-1 Agriculture zoning and the approved solar farm land use. SECTION 9 - STEWARDSHIP AND IMPLEMENTATION190THE YORKVILLE PLAN • CONNECTING OUR PAST TO THE FUTUREFUTURE LAND USE - MAP ADDENDUMS1.5 MILE REVIEW FOR 8115 IL ROUTE 47 (GRAINCO FS, INC. & A.B. SCHWARTZ)New Future Land Use Designation: General IndustrialSummary:In 2024, an application was approved requesting rezoning and an amendment to Kendall County’s Future Land Use Map from A-1 Agricultural District to M-1 Limited Manufacturing District located at 8115 IL Route 47 for the purpose of operating a tile business, offices, warehouses, fuel storage, and other light industrial uses within existing structures. The property is approximately 20 acres in size and is located within one and a half miles of the planning boundary for Yorkville, allowing the city the opportunity to review and provide comments to Kendall County. The property was originally designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. Part of the property was also originally designated “Agricultural Zone”, which is meant for general farming uses. The “General Industrial” designation is meant to accommodate a broad range of warehousing, manufacturing, and energy/industrial land uses. Changing this property’s designation to “General Industrial” is consistent with the County’s M-1 zoning and the approved industrial land use.CORNEILS ROAD SOLARNew Future Land Use Designation: Agricultural ZoneSummary:In 2024, an application was approved requesting annexation, rezoning, and special use permit approval to construct a 5-megawatt (MW) alternating current (AC) freestanding community solar farm located immediately north of Corneils Road, east of Beecher Road and west of IL Route 47 (N. Bridge Street). The 94-acre existing farmland property, which 31 acres will be used for a solar farm, was annexed to the City’s default R-1 Single Family Suburban Residential zoning and was rezoned to A-1 Agricultural District. The property was originally designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. The “Agricultural Zone” designation is meant for general farming uses. Changing this property’s designation to “Agricultural Zone” is consistent with the A-1 Agriculture zoning and the approved solar farm land use.KELAKA / GREEN DOOR CAPITALNew Future Land Use Designation: General IndustrialSummary:In 2024, an application was approved requesting annexation and rezoning approximately 148-acres of unincorporated farmland generally located south of the Burlington Santa Fe railroad line, just southeast of Faxon Road for the purpose of constructing and operating a future industrial/data center land use. The subject property consists of a portion of an existing 191-acre parcel. The property was rezoned R-1 Single-Family Suburban Residential District to M-2 General Manufacturing District. The property was originally designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. The “General Industrial” designation is meant to accommodate a broad range of warehousing, manufacturing, and energy/industrial land uses. Changing this property’s designation to “General Industrial” is consistent with the M-2 General Manufacturing zoning and future industrial / data center land use. SECTION 9 - STEWARDSHIP AND IMPLEMENTATION191THE YORKVILLE PLAN • CONNECTING OUR PAST TO THE FUTUREFUTURE LAND USE - MAP ADDENDUMS1.5 MILE REVIEW FOR 1520 CANNONBALL TRAIL (FOX VALLEY FAMILY YMCA)New Future Land Use Designation: Destination CommercialSummary:In 2024, an application was approved requesting site plan approval to construct a YMCA recreational facility, parking, and related infrastructure to a property at 1520 Cannonball Trail in Bristol Township. The property is approximately 25.8 acres and is located within one and a half miles of the planning boundary for Yorkville, allowing the city the opportunity to review and provide comments to Kendall County. The property was originally designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. Part of the property was also originally designated “Agricultural Zone”, which is meant for general farming uses. The “Destination Commercial” is intended for a broad range of commercial activities ranging from large format retail and strip centers to hotels and recreational complexes. Changing this property’s designation to “Destination Commercial” is consistent with the County’s B-4 zoning and the approved recreational facility land use.1.5 MILE REVIEW FOR 7789 IL ROUTE 47 (JERRY STYRCZULA / A&D PROPERTIES)New Future Land Use Designation: General IndustrialSummary:In 2024, an application was approved requesting rezoning from B-3 Highway Business District to M-1 Limited Manufacturing District located at 7789 IL Route 47 to operate a trucking business for the sale and storage of semi-trailers, small trailers, semi-tractors, and similar uses at the subject property. The property is approximately 16.4 acres and is located within one and a half miles of the planning boundary for Yorkville, allowing the city the opportunity to review and provide comments to Kendall County. The property was originally designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. Part of the property was also originally designated “Agricultural Zone”, which is meant for general farming uses. The “General Industrial” designation is meant to accommodate a broad range of warehousing, manufacturing, and energy/industrial land uses. Changing this property’s designation to “General Industrial” is consistent with the County’s M-1 zoning and the approved industrial land use.DMYF, LLLP (DANIELS, MALINSKI YORKVILLE FAMILY)New Future Land Use Designation: General IndustrialSummary:In 2025, an application was approved requesting annexation and rezoning approximately 270-acres of unincorporated farmland generally north of US 34 (Veterans Parkway), west of Beecher Road and Kendall Marketplace, and approximately 850 feet east of Eldamain Road for the purpose of constructing and operating a future industrial/data center land use. The property was rezoned R-1 Single-Family Suburban Residential District to M-2 General Manufacturing District. The property was originally designated “Suburban Neighborhood”, which is meant to provide single family detached housing options in traditional subdivision layouts. Part of the property was also designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. The “General Industrial” designation is meant to accommodate a broad range of warehousing, manufacturing, and energy/industrial land uses. Changing this property’s designation to “General Industrial” is consistent with the M-2 General Manufacturing zoning and future industrial / data center land use. SECTION 9 - STEWARDSHIP AND IMPLEMENTATION192THE YORKVILLE PLAN • CONNECTING OUR PAST TO THE FUTUREFUTURE LAND USE - MAP ADDENDUMS1115, LLC (FOX HAVEN MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT)New Future Land Use Designation: Mid-Density ResidentialSummary:In 2025, an application was approved requesting rezoning the 13-acre parcel from R-1 Single-Family Suburban Residence District to R-4 General Multi-Family Residence District for the purpose of developing a townhome community, known as Fox Haven, with 18 buildings totaling 105 townhome units located at 1115 South Bridge Street. The one-acre parcel fronting S Bridge Street will remain zoned as B-3 General Business District, with plans for a future commercial development and is not part of the amendment The property was formally occupied by the Parfection Park which included a golf range, batting cages, and mini golf outdoor entertainment venue which closed in October 2017. The property was originally designated “Commercial Office”, which is meant to provide commercial, office, and retail space along the City’s main commercial corridors including Route 47 and Route 34. The “Mid-Density Residential” designation is meant to provide higher density residential developments near commercial areas which include a variety of housing options. Changing this property’s designation to “Mid-Density Residential” is consistent with the R-4 zoning and the approved multi-family residential land use.HAMMAN – KELAKA, LLCNew Future Land Use Designation: General IndustrialSummary:In 2025, an application was approved requesting annexation and rezoning. The annexation request involves two parcels totaling approximately 62.54 acres, located south of Faxon Road and west of Iroquois Lane, which are currently undeveloped and used for farming. Additionally, the rezoning request is for three parcels totaling approximately 112.44 acres. The three parcels include the two annexation related parcels and one parcel north of West Veterans Parkway (US 34) and east of Eldamain Road, which is already located within City limits. The two northern parcels were rezoned from R-1 Single-Family Suburban Residential District to M-2 General Manufacturing District and the one parcel within City limits along US 34 was rezoned from B-3 General Business District to M-2 General Manufacturing District to accommodate future uses consistent with a proposed data center development. All three parcels were originally designated “Estate/Conservation Residential”, which is intended to allow flexibility in residential design, accommodating low-density detached single-family housing while preserving sensitive environmental and scenic features. The “General Industrial” designation is meant to accommodate a broad range of warehousing, manufacturing, and energy/industrial land uses. Changing this property’s designation to “General Industrial” is consistent with the M-2 General Manufacturing zoning and future industrial / data center land use.COSTCO WHOLESALE WAREHOUSENew Future Land Use Designation: Destination CommericalSummary:In 2025, an application was submitted requesting a PUD amendment, special use, and final plat to develop a members-only retail store spanning approximately 160,000 square feet and to establish and operate a standalone fueling facility generally located north of Veteran’s Parkway, east of McHugh Road, and southwest of East Countryside Parkway. The project is considered a major PUD amendment and would amend the Yorkville Crossing PUD. Additionally, the property’s existing B-3 zoning classification will remain unchanged. The property was originally designated “Mid-Density Residential”, which is meant to provide higher density residential developments near commercial areas which include a variety of housing options. The “Destination Commercial” is intended for a broad range of commercial activities ranging from large format retail and strip centers to hotels and recreational complexes. Changing this property’s designation to “Destination Commercial” is consistent with the B-3 zoning and the approved large retail store and fueling facility land use. Sold To: United City of Yorkville - CU00410749 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville,IL 60560 Bill To: United City of Yorkville - CU00410749 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville,IL60560 Certificate of Publication: Order Number: 7801740 Purchase Order: State of Illinois - Kane Chicago Tribune Media Group does hereby certify that it is the publisher of the The Beacon-News. The The Beacon-News is a secular newspaper, has been continuously published Daily for more than fifty (50) weeks prior to the first publication of the attached notice, is published in the City of Aurora, Township of Aurora, State of Illinois, is of general circulation throughout that county and surrounding area, and is a newspaper as defined by 715 IL CS 5/5. This is to certify that a notice, a true copy of which is attached, was published 1 time(s) in the The Beacon-News, namely one time per week or on 1 successive weeks. The first publication of the notice was made in the newspaper, dated and published on 4/25/2025, and the last publication of the notice was made in the newspaper dated and published on 4/25/2025. This notice was also placed on a statewide public notice website as required by 715 ILCS 5/2. 1. PUBLICATION DATES:Apr 25, 2025. ___________________________________________________________________________________ The Beacon-News In witness, an authorized agent of The Chicago Tribune Media Group has signed this certificate executed in Chicago, Illinois on this 28th Day of April, 2025, by Chicago Tribune Media Group Jeremy Gates Chicago Tribune - chicagotribune.com 160 N Stetson Avenue, Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 222-2222 - Fax: (312) 222-4014 Chicago Tribune - chicagotribune.com 160 N Stetson Avenue, Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 222-2222 - Fax: (312) 222-4014 Chicago Tribune - chicagotribune.com 160 N Stetson Avenue, Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 222-2222 - Fax: (312) 222-4014 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Daniel J. Gorman on Behalf of USA Energy Independence, LLC (Prospective Buyer) and Stanley L. Zepelak on Behalf of Lucaya Asset Management, LLC (Current Owner) Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Purchasing Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #9 Tracking Number EDC 2025-44 PZC 2025-09 – Kendall County Petition 25-04 (Between 9417 and 9221 Corneils Road) Economic Development Committee – June 3, 2025 Majority Approval 1.5-Mile Review of a solar farm request. David Hansen Community Development Name Department SUMMARY: Staff has reviewed a request from Kendall County Planning and Zoning Department along with the subsequent documents attached. This property is located within one and a half miles of the planning boundary for Yorkville, allowing the City the opportunity to review and provide comments to Kendall County. The petitioner, Daniel J. Gorman on Behalf of USA Energy Independence, LLC (Prospective Buyer) and Stanley L. Zepelak on Behalf of Lucaya Asset Management, LLC (Current Owner) are seeking a special use permit for a commercial solar energy facility and a variance to Section 36-282(17)(a) of the Kendall County Zoning Ordinance to allow a commercial solar energy facility on land within 1.5 miles of municipality without an annexation agreement. The real property is located immediately north of Corneils Road and approximately 0.5 miles east of Route 47 in unincorporated Kendall County. PROPERTY BACKGROUND: The property is located between 9417 and 9221 Corneils Road in unincorporated Kendall County and consists of one (1) parcel (PIN #02-09-400-007) totaling ~37.03 acres. The property is owned by Stanley L. Zepelak on Behalf of Lucaya Asset Management, LLC. The site is currently undeveloped and utilized for agricultural purposes. The United City of Yorkville’s corporate boundary borders the subject property to the west, east and north. • Corneils Crossing Subdivision is located immediately west and is zoned R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District. Although the subdivision was approved and entitled in 2006, it is currently undeveloped and utilized for agricultural purposes. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: David Hansen, Senior Planner CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Sara Mendez, Senior Planner Date: June 3, 2025 Subject: PZC 2025-09 – Kendall County Petition 25-04 (Daniel J. Gorman on Behalf of USA Energy Independence, LLC (Prospective Buyer) and Stanley L. Zepelak on Behalf of Lucaya Asset Management, LLC (Current Owner)) - 1.5 Mile Review • Bristol Ridge Subdivision is an approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) located immediately east with underlying zoning districts of R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District and R-3 Multi-Family Attached Residence District. In 2023, the Bristol Ridge PUD was amended to allow a solar farm development on the area east of Cannonball Trail and north of the BNSF Railway (Bristol Solar 105). The solar farm development is less than ½ a mile away from the subject property. • Bristol Bay Subdivision is an approved PUD that is located immediately north with underlying zoning districts of R-2 Single-Family Traditional Residence District and R-3 Multi-Family Attached Residence District. Although the subdivision was approved and entitled in 2005, the area south of Galena Rd is currently undeveloped and utilized for agricultural purposes. Lastly, the subject property is also bordered by unincorporated residential properties to its south, east, and west. Raging Waves water park is located within a half (1/2) a mile west of the subject property. CORRESPONDENCE WITH PETITIONER: In late 2024, Daniel J. Gorman on Behalf of USA Energy Independence, LLC, reached out to Yorkville and asked whether the City wished to enter into a pre-annexation agreement for the proposed solar energy facility on parcel #02-09-400-007. The site is unincorporated and contiguous to the United City of Yorkville. Upon discussion, the consensus amongst staff was that the City would not support the proposed solar farm annexation and development within Yorkville for the following reasons: • The parcel is directly adjacent to several residential homes to the south, east, and west. • The location of the solar panels is adjacent to a suspected wetland area to the north. • The plan includes five new utility poles proposed near existing residential properties to the east. • The proposed plan does not meet the City’s required minimum setback of 1,000 feet from the roadway; the plan currently proposes a setback of approximately 800 feet from Corneils Road, which is designated as a potential future major east/west collector roadway in Yorkville. In March 2025, USA Energy Independence provided an updated site plan. The site plan proposed a setback of approximately 500 feet from Corneils Road, a 300 foot decrease from the original site plan submittal of 800 feet. The proposed setback of approximately 500 feet from Corneils Road is inconsistent with the City of Yorkville’s required setback of 1,000 feet from the nearest roadway network. Thus, staff reiterated to the petitioner that the City would not pursue a pre-annexation agreement for the proposed solar energy facility at this time and encouraged the petitioner to seek approval through Kendall County. Based off Yorkville’s staff feedback, the applicant, Daniel J. Gorman on Behalf of USA Energy Independence, LLC, has filed for a variance to Section 36-282(17)(a) with Kendall County. This variance would allow the proposed solar energy facility to proceed without annexation or an annexation agreement. Per Section 36-282(17)(a) of the Kendall County Zoning Ordinance: “All commercial solar energy facilities and test solar energy systems located within one and one-half (1½) miles of a municipality shall either annex to the municipality or obtain an annexation agreement with the municipality requiring the municipality's regulations to flow through the property.” PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The property is currently zoned A-1 Agricultural District. Per Kendall County’s Zoning Ordinance, all development proposed in the district must obtain site plan approval from the County Board. According to the application and site plans provided, the applicant is proposing a 5 MW AC community solar farm on one parcel (PIN #02-09-400-007) in Kendall County. The project encompasses an approximate 37.03-acres. Per Section 36-282 of Kendall County’s Zoning Ordinance, construction and operation of Commercial Solar Energy Facilities are permitted in the Agricultural District by Special Use Permit. At the May 6, 2025 Kendall County Zoning Platting and Advisory Committee meeting, the committee issued a neutral recommendation of the proposed development and added an additional condition requiring the developer/owner to enter into a community impact agreement with Kendall County. The community impact agreement would require the owner/operator of the solar farm to pay the County a certain dollar amount per megawatt (MW) produced. Please see below for an overview of the project along with the proposed site plan and structure detail: • The solar development intends to have approximately 12,120 solar panel arrays on site. • The ground mounted equipment plan shows a maximum structure height of 10’11 3/8” at full tilt. • The setback to the nearest solar array is greater than 250 feet to the nearest residence and greater than 150 feet to the nearest residential property line. • The fenced area intends to be approximately 20.1 acres, which takes up 54.2% of the parcel. • The security fence on site would be six (6) feet in height. • The access road shows a fifteen (15) foot wide gravel road inside a twenty (20) foot road easement on the southeast corner of the property. The entrance off Corneils Road is forty (40) feet wide. YORKVILLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Yorkville’s 2016 Comprehensive Plan designation for this property is Estate/Conservation Residential. The Estate/Conservation Residential future land use is intended to provide flexibility for residential design in areas in Yorkville that can accommodate low-density detached single-family housing but also include sensitive environmental and scenic features that should be retained and enhanced. Although the proposed land use and A-1 zoning in Kendall County is inconsistent with Yorkville’s Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map, the County’s zoning would be consistent with the City’s zoning classification for a solar farm. If approved, the proposed facility to operate a commercial solar energy facility would necessitate a review and a potential amendment to the Yorkville Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map for this area. An appropriate future land use designation for this use would be the “Agricultural Zone” designation, which is meant for general farming uses. STAFF COMMENTS Staff is seeking input from the Economic Development Committee as the one-and-a-half-mile review allows for the City to make comments and requests to the petitioner and County prior to their public meetings. This review will also be brought to the Planning and Zoning Commission at the June 11, 2025 meeting and the City Council at the June 24, 2025 meeting. This item was delivered to the City on April 23, 2025. ATTACHMENTS 1. Application with Attachments ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier – April 23, 2025 Page 1 of 9 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, BUILDING & ZONING 807 West John Street • Yorkville, IL • 60560 (630) 553-4141 Fax (630) 553-4179 Petition 25-04 Daniel J. Gorman on Behalf of USA Energy Independence, LLC (Prospective Buyer) and Stanley L. Zepelak on Behalf of Lucaya Asset Management, LLC (Current Owner) A-1 Special Use Permit for Commercial Solar Energy Facility and Variance to Allow the Facility on Land Within 1.5 Miles of a Municipality Without an Annexation Agreement INTRODUCTION The Petitioner is seeking a special use permit for a commercial solar energy facility and a variance to Section 36-282(17)a of the Kendall County Code to allow a commercial solar energy facility on land within one point five (1.5) miles of municipality without an annexation agreement. The application materials, including the boundary survey, are included as Attachment 1. Stormwater information, including the wetland delineation report, is included as Attachment 2. The site plan is included as Attachment 3. The vegetative management plan is included as Attachment 4. Decommissioning information is included as Attachment 5. The Agricultural Impact Mitigation Agreement is included as Attachment 6. SITE INFORMATION PETITIONER: Daniel J. Gorman on Behalf of USA Energy Independence, LLC (Prospective Buyer) and Stanley L. Zepelak on Behalf of the Lucaya Asset Management, LLC (Current Owner) ADDRESS: Between 9417 and 9221 Corneils Road, Bristol LOCATION: Approximately 0.5 Miles East of Route 47 on the North Side of Corneils Road Aerial of Entire Property TOWNSHIP: Bristol ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier – April 23, 2025 Page 2 of 9 PARCEL #: 02-09-400-007 LOT SIZE: 37.03 +/- Acres (Total Parcel) and 20.1 +/- (Fenced Area) EXISTING LAND USE: Agricultural ZONING: A-1 LRMP: Future Land Use Suburban Residential (Max 1.00 DU/Acre) (County) Estate/Conservation Residential (Yorkville) Roads Corneils Road is a Minor Collector Road maintained by Bristol Township. Trails The United City of Yorkville has a trail planned along Corneils Road. Floodplain/ Wetlands There are no floodplains on the property. There is one (1) farmed wetland on the property and two (2) additional wet areas on the property identified in the wetland delineation report. REQUESTED ACTIONS: Special Use Permit for a Commercial Solar Energy System Variance to Allow a Commercial Solar Energy System on Land with One Point Five (1.5) Miles of a Municipality without an Annexation Agreement APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: §36-282(17) – A-1 Special Uses §36-39 – Variance Procedures Chapter 36, Article II, Division 3, Subdivision I – Special Use Procedures SURROUNDING LAND USE Location Adjacent Land Use Adjacent Zoning Land Resource Management Plan Zoning within ½ Mile North Agricultural R-2, R-2D, R-3, and B-3 (Yorkville) Urbanized Communities (County) Estate/Conservation Residential (Yorkville) A-1 (County) R-2, R-2D, R-3, and B-3 (Yorkville) South Agricultural and Single- Family Residential A-1 and R-3 (County) Suburban Residential (County) Estate/Conservation Residential and Metra Station Transit Oriented Development (Yorkville) A-1 and R-3 (County) R-4 and B-3 (Yorkville) East Agricultural and Single- Family Residential A-1 (County) R-2, R-2D, R-3, and B-3 (Yorkville) Urbanized Communities and Suburban Residential (County) A-1, A-1 SU, R-3, B-1, and B-3 (County) R-2, R-2D, R-3, and B-3 (Yorkville) ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier – April 23, 2025 Page 3 of 9 Estate/Conservation Residential (Yorkville) West Agricultural and Single- Family Residential A-1 (County) R-2 (Yorkville) Urbanized Communities, Suburban Residential, and Commercial (County) Estate/Conservation Residential (Yorkville) A-1, A-1 SU, and R-3 (County) R-2 and B-3 (Yorkville) The A-1 special use permit to the east is for a landscaping business. The A-1 special use permit to the west is for a welding business. Approximately thirty-three (33) homes, not including the homes in the original town of Bristol Station are located within half (1/2) of a mile of the subject property. Raging Waves water park is also located within half (1/2) of a mile of the subject property. PHYSICAL DATA ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT EcoCAT Report identified protected resources in the area, but negative impacts were unlikely. The Illinois Department of Natural Resources recommended establishing pollinator friendly habitat as groundcover where feasible and the site should be de-compacted before planting. The letter from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources is included as Attachment 1, Pages 46 and 47. NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY The LESA Score was 179 indicating a low level of protection. The NRI Report is included as Attachment 11. ACTION SUMMARY BRISTOL TOWNSHIP Petition information was sent to Bristol Township on April 23, 2025. Prior to submittal to Kendall County, the Bristol Township Board reviewed the proposal on April 7, 2025, but that meeting was for informational purposes only. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE Petition information was sent to the United City of Yorkville on April 23, 2025. Prior to formal application submittal, the United City of Yorkville submitted an email stating they would not pursue annexation at this time. The email notes the proximity of several homes to the subject property; the proposal does not meet Yorkville’s one thousand foot (1,000’) setback requirement from Corneils Road; the proximity to a wetland was noted; five (5) new utility poles were proposed. Yorkville’s email is included as Attachment 7. On March 25, 2025, Yorkville submitted an email requesting a forty-foot (40’) right-of-way dedication. On April 2, 2025, Bristol Township submitted an email agreeing to the requested dedication. These emails are included as Attachments 8 and 9. BRISTOL-KENDALL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Petition information was sent to the Bristol-Kendall Fire Protection District on April 23, 2025. ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier – April 23, 2025 Page 4 of 9 GENERAL INFORMATION Per § 36-282(17) of the Kendall County Code, commercial solar energy facilities businesses can be special uses on A-1 zoned property subject to the following conditions (Staff Comments in Bold): a. All commercial solar energy facilities and test solar energy systems located within one point five (1.5) miles of a municipality shall either annex to the municipality or obtain an annexation agreement with the municipality requiring the municipality’s regulations to flow through the property. Petitioner is requesting a variance. b. The setbacks for commercial solar energy facilities shall be measured from the nearest edge of any component of the facility as follows: Occupied Community Buildings or Dwellings on Nonparticipating Properties-One hundred fifty feet (150’) from the nearest point on the outside wall of the structure Boundary Lines of Participating Properties-None Boundary Lines of Nonparticipating Properties- Fifty feet (50’) to the nearest point on the property line of the nonparticipating property Public Road Rights-Of-Way-Fifty feet (50’) from the nearest edge The above setbacks do not exempt or excuse compliance with electric facility clearances approved or required by the National Electrical Code, the National Electrical Safety Code, Commerce Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and their designees or successors. Per the site plan, see Attachment 3, Page 1, the closet nonparticipating structure is greater than two hundred fifty feet (250’) from the solar panels. The solar panels are greater than five hundred feet (500’) from Corneils Road. c. A commercial solar energy facility’s perimeter shall be enclosed by fencing having a height of at least six feet (6’) and no more than twenty-five feet (25’). This is true. Per the application materials, see Attachment 1, Page 9, the fence is proposed to be six feet (6’) in height. As noted in the site plan, see Attachment 3, Page 4, the fence will be six inches (6”) above the finished grade. The fence will be chain link topped with barbed wire. d. No component of a solar panel as part of a commercial solar energy facility shall have a height of more than twenty feet (20’) above ground when the solar energy facility’s arrays are at full tilt. This is true. Per the site plan, see Attachment 3, Page 2, the maximum height will be ten feet, eleven and three-eighths inches (10’-11 3/8”). e. The above setback, fencing, and component height requirements may be waived subject to written consent of the owner of each affected nonparticipating property. This written consent shall be submitted at the time of application submittal. No such consent requested or needed. f. Sound limitations for components in commercial solar energy facilities shall follow the sound limitations established by the Illinois Pollution Control Board. A noise study was provided; see Attachment 12. g. The County shall not require standards for construction, decommissioning, or deconstruction of a commercial solar energy system or related financial assurances to be more restrictive than agricultural impact mitigation agreement set in State law. The amount of any decommissioning payment shall be limited to the cost identified in the decommissioning or deconstruction plan, as required by the agricultural impact mitigation agreement, minus the salvage value of the project. A copy of the agricultural impact mitigation agreement shall be submitted with the application materials. The decommissioning plan is included as Attachment 5 and is outlined in the Agricultural Impact Mitigation Agreement, which is included as Attachment 6. As noted on Page 2 of Attachment 5, the Petitioner is offering a bond of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000). As suggested on Page 2 of Attachment 5, the Petitioner is agreeable to not fight the County in court, if the County wished to acquire title to the subject property in the event that the decommissioning bond is insufficient ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier – April 23, 2025 Page 5 of 9 to cover all of the costs. h. A vegetative screening shall be placed around the commercial solar energy facility. The site plan (Attachment 3) references a row of Black Hills Spruce and a row Buttonbush. The spruce will be six feet (6’) minimum in height within three (3) years of planting and the Buttonbush will be four feet (4’) minimum in height within three (3) years of planting, as outlined on Page 8 of Attachment 3. The vegetative management plan was provided as Attachment 4. The types of vegetation, timing of planting, and maintenance plan are included in the vegetative management plan. i. Commercial solar energy facility applicants shall provide the results and recommendations from consultations with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources obtained through the Ecological Compliance Assessment Tool (EcoCat) or a comparable successor tool. The commercial solar energy facility applicant shall adhere to the recommendations provided through this consultation. The EcoCat was submitted and the recommendation was to establish pollinator friendly habitat as groundcover where feasible and the site should be de-compacted before planting. The letter from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources is included as Attachment 1, Pages 46 and 47. j. Commercial solar energy facility applicants shall provide the results of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s Information for Planning and Consulting environmental review or a comparable successor toll that is consistent with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Land-Based Wind Energy Guidelines and any applicable United States Fish and Wildlife Service solar wildlife guidelines that have been subject to public review. This was provided on Pages 48 through 62 of the application material (Attachment 1). Five (5) threatened or endangered species were in the area. k. A facility owner shall demonstrate avoidance of protected lands as identified by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources and the Illinois Nature Preserve Commission or consider the recommendations of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources for setbacks from protected lands, including areas identified by the Illinois Nature Preserve Commission. While the site is designed around one (1) farmed wetland, there are other wet areas on the property that need to be examined through the stormwater permit review process. l. A facility owner shall provide evidence at the time of application submittal of consultation with the Illinois State Historic Preservation Office to assess potential impacts on State-registered historic sites under applicable State law. This information was provided as Attachment 10. The State Historic Preservation Office is requesting a Phase I Archeological Survey, per Attachment 10, Page 14. m. A commercial solar energy facility owner shall plant, establish, and maintain for the life of the facility vegetative ground cover consistent with State law and the guidelines of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources’ vegetative management plans. The vegetation management plan shall be required at the time of application submittal. The vegetation management plan, including timelines for planting and maintenance of the vegetation, was provided, see Attachment 4. n. The facility owner shall enter into a road use agreement with the jurisdiction having control over the applicable roads. The road use agreement shall follow applicable law. The facility owner shall supply the Kendall County Planning, Building and Zoning Department with a copy of the road use agreement. This provision shall be waived if the jurisdiction having control over the applicable roads does not wish to enter into an agreement. As of the date of this memo, the road use agreement negotiations are ongoing. The application materials (Attachment 1, Page 10) and the site plan (Attachment 3) show at a fifteen foot (15’) wide gravel road inside a twenty foot (20’) road easement on the southeast corner of the property. The entrance off of Corneils Road will be forty feet (40’) wide. o. The facility owner shall repair or pay for the repair of all damage to the drainage system caused by the construction of the commercial solar energy system within a reasonable time after construction of the commercial solar energy facility is complete. The specific time shall be set in the special use permit. No drain tile information was provided. On Page 13 of Attachment 1, there is a statement that no drain tile exists on the property. ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier – April 23, 2025 Page 6 of 9 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING CODES No buildings are planned for the site. Any structures proposed for the site, including the solar arrays, shall obtain applicable permits. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH The property is presently farmland. No wells, septic systems, or refuse collection points were identified. STORMWATER The proposed area of disturbance is approximately point six-five acres (0.65). The County has concerns regarding the wet areas identified in the wetland delineation report (Attachment 2) and the farmed wetland identified on the property. The Petitioner submitted a stormwater permit application. The temporary laydown area shown on the site plan (Attachment 3) is not proposed to be gravel. Four (4) infiltration basins are shown on the site plan (Attachment 3). Three (3) of these basins would be installed if required by the stormwater pollution prevention plan. No information regarding the infiltration basin was provided. ACCESS The application materials (Attachment 1, Page 10) and the site plan (Attachment 3) show a fifteen foot (15’) wide gravel road inside a twenty foot (20’) road easement on the southeast corner of the property. The entrance off of Corneils Road will be forty feet (40’) wide. PARKING AND INTERNAL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION No permanent parking was proposed. There will be a staging area during construction. LIGHTING No lighting was proposed. SIGNAGE The Petitioner proposed installing one (1) sign at the vehicular access gate stating emergency contact information (Attachment 1, Page 13). GLARE A glare study was provided as Attachment 13. IMPACT ON PROPERTY VALUES No information was provided regarding impacts on property values ODORS No odors were foreseen. NOISE A noise study was provided as Attachment 12. RELATION TO OTHER SPECIAL USES If approved, this would be the second special use permit for a commercial solar energy facility in unincorporated Kendall County. FINDINGS OF FACT-SPECIAL USE PERMIT § 36-119 of the Kendall County Code outlines findings that the Zoning Board of Appeals must make in order to recommend in favor of the applicant on special use permit applications. They are listed below in italics. Staff has provided findings in bold below based on the recommendation: The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the special use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. The Project will generate clean, renewable electricity while producing no air, noise, or water pollution, or ground contamination. The front portion of the parcel closest to Corneils Road will be retained for agricultural use and/or future residential use. ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier – April 23, 2025 Page 7 of 9 The Petitioner submitted a vegetative management plan outlining the types of vegetation that will be planted, the timing of planting, and a maintenance plan for the vegetation. The special use will not be substantially injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The Zoning classification of property within the general area of the property in question shall be considered in determining consistency with this standard. The proposed use makes adequate provisions for appropriate buffers, landscaping, fencing, lighting, building materials, open space and other improvements necessary to insure that the proposed use does not adversely impact adjacent uses and is compatible with the surrounding area and/or the County as a whole. The proposal will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of nearby properties. The surrounding properties are zoned A-1 and various residential classifications and will not be prevented from continuing any existing use or from pursuing future uses. The proposal’s operations would be quiet and minimal traffic will occur after installation is completed. The solar panels are setback from Corneils Road and screened by vegetation from neighboring houses to avoid negative visual impacts. Adequate utilities, access roads and points of ingress and egress, drainage, and/or other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. The proposal will have adequate utility interconnections designed in collaboration with ComEd. The proposal does not require water, sewer, or any other public utility facilities to operate. The Petitioner will also build all roads and entrances at the facility and will enter into an agreement with Bristol Township regarding road use. After initial construction traffic, landscape maintenance and maintenance to the project components are anticipated to occur on an as-needed basis, consistent with the vegetative management plan. Existing traffic patterns will not be impacted in the post-construction operations phase. While no drain tile is believed to be on the subject property, damaged drain tile will be repaired as outlined in the Agricultural Impact Mitigation Agreement and a condition attached to this special use permit. The special use shall in all other respects conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may in each instance be modified by the County Board pursuant to the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals. If the requested variance is granted, the proposal meets all applicable regulations. The special use is consistent with the purpose and objectives of the Land Resource Management Plan and other adopted County or municipal plans and policies. The proposal is also consistent with a goal and objective found on page 3-4 of the Land Resource Management Plan, “Support the public and private use of sustainable energy systems (examples include wind, solar, and geo-thermal).” However, the proposal is located on property classified as Residential on the Future Land Use Map and the Kendall County Regional Planning Commission recommended denial of similar proposals. FINDINGS OF FACT-VARIANCE §36-39 of the Kendall County Code outlines findings that the Zoning Board of Appeals must make in order to grant variations. They are listed below in italics. Staff has provided findings in bold below based on the recommendation: The particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical condition of the specific property involved would result in a particular hardship or practical difficulty upon the owner if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. The subject property is located within one point five (1.5) miles of the United City of Yorkville. Information was provided stating that the United City of Yorkville did not wish to annex the property or enter into a pre-annexation agreement. The conditions upon which the requested variation is based would not be applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning classification. Other A-1 zoned properties within one point five (1.5) miles of a municipality could request a similar variance, if the municipality refuses to annex or enter into a pre- annexation agreement. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The difficulty was created because the United City of Yorkville did not wish to enter into a pre- annexation agreement or annex the property. ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier – April 23, 2025 Page 8 of 9 The granting of the variation will not materially be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. Granting the variance would not be detrimental to the public or substantially injurious to other properties. That the proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. The proposed variance would not impair light or air on adjacent property, cause congestion, increase the danger of fire, or negatively impact property values. RECOMMENDATION Given that the Kendall County Regional Planning Commission previously recommended denial of proposals on properties classified as Residential on the County’s Future Land Use Map, and because of lack of clarity in State law regarding using the LaSalle and Sinclar Factors in evaluating applications of special use permits for commercial solar facilities, Staff’s recommendation is neutral. Assuming that conditions can be imposed on the special use permit, the proposed conditions and restrictions are as follows: 1. The site shall be developed substantially in accordance with the submitted site plan (Attachment 3), vegetative management plan (Attachment 4), decommissioning plan (Attachment 5), road access plan (yet to be submitted), and Agricultural Impact Mitigation Agreement (Attachment 6). The Black Hills Spruce shall be planted in one (1) row and the Buttonbush shall be planted in a second row. 2. A variance to section 36-282(17)(a) of the Kendall County Code is hereby granted allowing a commercial solar energy facility within one point five (1.5) miles of a municipality without an annexation or pre-annexation agreement. 3. In the event that the decommissioning bond is insufficient to cover the costs of decommissioning the site as outlined in the decommissioning plan (Attachment 5), the owners of the subject property shall not contest in court if the County wishes to obtain title to the subject property to cover the costs of decommissioning the use allowed by this special use permit. 4. Within ninety (90) days of the approval of the special use permit, the owners of the subject property shall dedicate a strip of land forty feet (40’) in depth along the southern property line to Bristol Township. The Kendall County Planning, Building and Zoning Committee may grant an extension to this deadline. 5. None of the vehicles or equipment parked or stored on the subject property allowed by the special use permit shall be considered agricultural vehicles or agricultural equipment. 6. All of the vehicles and equipment stored on the subject property allowed by the special use permit shall be maintained in good condition with no deflated tires and shall be licensed if required by law. 7. Any structures, including solar arrays, constructed, installed, or used allowed by this special use permit shall not be considered for agricultural purposes and must secure applicable building permits. 8. One (1) warning sign shall be placed near or on the entrance gate. This sign shall include, at minimum, the address of the subject property and a twenty-four (24) hour emergency contact phone number. Additional signage may be installed, if required by applicable law. 9. KenCom and other applicable public safety agencies shall be supplied the access code to the Knox Box/security gate. 10. Damaged drain tile will be repaired on a timeframe approved by the Kendall County Planning, Building and Zoning Department. 11. The operators of the use allowed by this special use permit acknowledge and agree to follow Kendall County’s Right to Farm Clause. 12. The property owner and operator of the use allowed by this special use permit shall follow all applicable Federal, State, and Local laws related to the operation of this type of use. ZPAC Memo – Prepared by Matt Asselmeier – April 23, 2025 Page 9 of 9 13. Failure to comply with one or more of the above conditions or restrictions could result in the amendment or revocation of the special use permit. 14. If one or more of the above conditions is declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining conditions shall remain valid. 15. This special use permit and variance shall be treated as a covenant running with the land and is binding on the successors, heirs, and assigns as to the same special use conducted on the property. ATTACHMENTS 1. Application Materials 2. Wetland Delineation Reports 3. Site Plan 4. Vegetative Management Plan 5. Decommissioning Information 6. Agricultural Impact Mitigation Agreement 7. January 27, 2025, Email from the United City of Yorkville 8. March 25, 2025, Email from the United City of Yorkville 9. April 2, 2025, Email from Bristol Township 10. State Historic Preservation Office Information 11. NRI Report 12. Noise Study 13. Glare Study Attachment 1, Page 1 Attachment 1, Page 2 Attachment 1, Page 3 Attachment 1, Page 4 Attachment 1, Page 5 Attachment 1, Page 6 Attachment 1, Page 7 Attachment 1, Page 8 Attachment 1, Page 9 Attachment 1, Page 10 Attachment 1, Page 11 Attachment 1, Page 12 Attachment 1, Page 13 Attachment 1, Page 14 Attachment 1, Page 15 Attachment 1, Page 16 Attachment 1, Page 17 Attachment 1, Page 18 Attachment 1, Page 19 Attachment 1, Page 20 Attachment 1, Page 21 Attachment 1, Page 22 Attachment 1, Page 23 Attachment 1, Page 24 Attachment 1, Page 25 Attachment 1, Page 26 Attachment 1, Page 27 Attachment 1, Page 28 Attachment 1, Page 29 Attachment 1, Page 30 Attachment 1, Page 31 Attachment 1, Page 32 Attachment 1, Page 33 Attachment 1, Page 34 Attachment 1, Page 35 Attachment 1, Page 36 Attachment 1, Page 37 Attachment 1, Page 38 Attachment 1, Page 39 Attachment 1, Page 40 Attachment 1, Page 41 Attachment 1, Page 42 Attachment 1, Page 43 Attachment 1, Page 44 Attachment 1, Page 45 Attachment 1, Page 46 Attachment 1, Page 47 Attachment 1, Page 48 Attachment 1, Page 49 Attachment 1, Page 50 Attachment 1, Page 51 Attachment 1, Page 52 Attachment 1, Page 53 Attachment 1, Page 54 Attachment 1, Page 55 Attachment 1, Page 56 Attachment 1, Page 57 Attachment 1, Page 58 Attachment 1, Page 59 Attachment 1, Page 60 Attachment 1, Page 61 Attachment 1, Page 62 Attachment 1, Page 63 Attachment 1, Page 64 Attachment 1, Page 65 Attachment 2, Page 1 Attachment 2, Page 2 Attachment 2, Page 3 Attachment 2, Page 4 Attachment 2, Page 5 Attachment 2, Page 6 Attachment 2, Page 7 Attachment 2, Page 8 Attachment 2, Page 9 Attachment 2, Page 10 Attachment 2, Page 11 Attachment 2, Page 12 Attachment 2, Page 13 Attachment 2, Page 14 Attachment 2, Page 15 Attachment 2, Page 16 Attachment 2, Page 17 Attachment 2, Page 18 Attachment 2, Page 19 Attachment 2, Page 20 Attachment 2, Page 21 Attachment 2, Page 22 Attachment 2, Page 23 Attachment 2, Page 24 Attachment 2, Page 25 Attachment 2, Page 26 Attachment 2, Page 27 Attachment 2, Page 28 Attachment 2, Page 29 Attachment 2, Page 30 Attachment 2, Page 31 Attachment 2, Page 32 Attachment 2, Page 33 Attachment 2, Page 34 Attachment 2, Page 35 Attachment 2, Page 36 Attachment 2, Page 37 Attachment 2, Page 38 Attachment 2, Page 39 Attachment 2, Page 40 Attachment 2, Page 41 Attachment 2, Page 42 Attachment 3, Page 1 Attachment 3, Page 2 Attachment 3, Page 3 Attachment 3, Page 4 Attachment 3, Page 5 Attachment 3, Page 6 Attachment 3, Page 7 Attachment 3, Page 8 Attachment 3, Page 9 Attachment 3, Page 10 Attachment 3, Page 11 Attachment 4, Page 1 Attachment 4, Page 2 Attachment 4, Page 3 Attachment 4, Page 4 Attachment 4, Page 5 Attachment 4, Page 6 Attachment 4, Page 7 Attachment 4, Page 8 Attachment 4, Page 9 Attachment 4, Page 10 Attachment 4, Page 11 Attachment 4, Page 12 Attachment 4, Page 13 Attachment 4, Page 14 Attachment 4, Page 15 Attachment 4, Page 16 Attachment 5, Page 1 Attachment 5, Page 2 Attachment 5, Page 3 Attachment 5, Page 4 Attachment 5, Page 5 Attachment 5, Page 6 Attachment 5, Page 7 Attachment 5, Page 8 Attachment 5, Page 9 Attachment 5, Page 10 Attachment 5, Page 11 Attachment 6, Page 1 Attachment 6, Page 2 Attachment 6, Page 3 Attachment 6, Page 4 Attachment 6, Page 5 Attachment 6, Page 6 Attachment 6, Page 7 Attachment 6, Page 8 Attachment 6, Page 9 Attachment 6, Page 10 Attachment 6, Page 11 Attachment 6, Page 12 Attachment 6, Page 13 Attachment 6, Page 14 Attachment 7 Attachment 8 Attachment 9 Attachment 10, Page 1 Attachment 10, Page 2 Attachment 10, Page 3 Attachment 10, Page 4 Attachment 10, Page 5 Attachment 10, Page 6 Attachment 10, Page 7 Attachment 10, Page 8 Attachment 10, Page 9 Attachment 10, Page 10 Attachment 10, Page 11 Attachment 10, Page 12 Attachment 10, Page 13 Attachment 10, Page 14 Attachment 11, Page 1 Attachment 11, Page 2 NRI 2504 April 2025 PURPOSE AND INTENT The purpose of this report is to provide officials of the local governing body and other decision-makers with natural resource information. This information may be useful when undertaking land use decisions concerning variations, amendments or relief of local zoning ordinances, proposed subdivision of vacant or agricultural lands and the subsequent development of these lands. This report is a requirement under Section 22.02a of the Illinois Soil and Water Conservation Districts Act. The intent of this report is to present the most current natural resource information available in a readily understandable manner. It contains a description of the present site conditions, the present resources, and the potential impacts that the proposed change may have on the site and its resources. The natural resource information was gathered from standardized data, on-site investigations and information furnished by the petitioner. This report must be read in its entirety so that the relationship between the natural resource factors and the proposed land use change can be fully understood. Due to the limitations of scale encountered with the various resource maps, the property boundaries depicted in the various exhibits in this report provide a generalized representation of the property location and may not precisely reflect the legal description of the PIQ (Parcel in Question). This report, when used properly, will provide the basis for proper land use change decisions and development while protecting the natural resource base of the county. It should not be used in place of detailed environmental and/or engineering studies that are warranted under most circumstances, but in conjunction with those studies. The conclusions of this report in no way indicate that a certain land use is not possible, but it should alert the reader to possible problems that may occur if the capabilities of the land are ignored. Any questions on the technical data supplied in this report or if anyone feels that they would like to see more additional specific information to make the report more effective, please contact: Kendall County Soil and Water Conservation District 7775A Route 47, Yorkville, IL 60560 Phone: (630) 553-5821 ext. 3 E-mail: Alyse.Olson@il.nacdnet.net Attachment 11, Page 3 NRI 2504 April 2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 1 PARCEL LOCATION ........................................................................................................................................ 8 ARCHAEOLOGIC/CULTURAL RESOURCES INFORMATION ........................................................................... 10 ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AREAS ............................................................................................................... 11 SOILS INFORMATION .................................................................................................................................. 13 SOILS INTERPRETATIONS EXPLANATION..................................................................................................... 15 BUILDING LIMITATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 16 SOIL WATER FEATURES ............................................................................................................................... 22 SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ................................................................................................... 24 PRIME FARMLAND SOILS ............................................................................................................................ 25 LAND EVALUATION AND SITE ASSESSMENT (LESA) .................................................................................... 26 LAND USE PLANS ......................................................................................................................................... 28 DRAINAGE, RUNOFF, AND FLOOD INFORMATION ..................................................................................... 28 WATERSHED PLANS .................................................................................................................................... 32 WETLAND INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................... 33 HYDRIC SOILS .............................................................................................................................................. 35 WETLAND AND FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS .............................................................................................. 37 GLOSSARY.................................................................................................................................................... 38 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................ 41 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: Soil Map ………………………………..……………………..……………………………………………………..………………… 2 FIGURE 2: Soil Limitations …………..……………………………………………………….…………………………………………………. 4 FIGURE 3: 2021 Plat Map ………………..……………………………………………………….………...………………………………….. 8 FIGURE 4: Aerial Map with NRI Site Boundary ………………………….………….………………………….……………..……... 9 FIGURE 5: Soil Map ………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………… 14 FIGURE 6A-6C: Maps of Building Limitations ……………………………………………..……………………………..…….. 19-21 Attachment 11, Page 4 NRI 2504 April 2025 FIGURE 7: Prime Farmland Soils …………………………………….………………………………………..…………………….…….. 25 FIGURE 8: Flood Map ……………………..………………….……………….…………………….………….……………………………… 30 FIGURE 9: Topographic Map ……………………………………………….…………………………..………………….……………….. 31 FIGURE 10: Watershed Map …………………………………………………….……………………………..………………………….… 32 FIGURE 11: Wetland Map ……………………………………………………………………………………………..…….……….………. 34 FIGURE 12: Hydric Soils Map …………………………………………………………………………………….……….…….…………… 36 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: Soils Information ……………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………….. 3 TABLE 2: Soil Limitations ………………………………..………………………………………………….……………………….………….. 4 TABLE 3: Soil Map Unit Descriptions …………………………………………………………….…………………………..………….. 14 TABLE 4: Building Limitations ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 17 TABLE 5: Water Features ………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………..…… 23 TABLE 6: Soil Erosion Potential ……………………………………………………………………………………………….……………. 24 TABLE 7: Prime Farmland Soils …………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………. 25 TABLE 8A: Land Evaluation Computation ………………………………………………………..…………………………..………. 26 TABLE 8B: Site Assessment Computation ………………………………………………………….………………………………….. 27 TABLE 9: LESA Score Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 27 TABLE 10: Hydric Soils ………………………..…………………………………………………..…………………………….…..………… 35 Attachment 11, Page 5 Attachment 11, Page 6 NRI 2504 April 2025 2 NATURAL RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS SOIL INFORMATION Based on information from the United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) 2008 Kendall County Soil Survey, this project area contains the soil types shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. Please note this does not replace the need for or results of onsite soil testing. If completed, please refer to onsite soil test results for planning/engineering purposes. Figure 1: Soil Map Attachment 11, Page 7 NRI 2504 April 2025 3 Table 1: Soils Information Soil Type Soil Name Drainage Class Hydrologic Group Hydric Designation Farmland Designation Acres % Area 152A Drummer silty clay loam, 0-2% slopes Poorly Drained B/D Hydric Prime Farmland if Drained 1.9 9.0% 219A Millbrook silt loam, 0-2% slopes Somewhat Poorly Drained C/D Non-Hydric w/ Hydric Inclusions Prime Farmland if Drained 1.2 5.8% 318C2 Lorenzo loam, 4-6% slopes, eroded Well Drained B Non-Hydric Farmland of Statewide Importance 2.1 10.1% 791A Rush silt loam, 0-2% slopes Well Drained B Non-Hydric w/ Hydric Inclusions Prime Farmland 7.5 36.1% 791B Rush silt loam, 2-4% slopes Well Drained B Non-Hydric w/ Hydric Inclusions Prime Farmland 8.1 39.0% Hydrologic Soil Groups – Soils have been classified into four (A, B, C, D) hydrologic groups based on runoff characteristics due to rainfall. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second letter is for undrained areas. • Hydrologic group A: Soils have a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. • Hydrologic group B: Soils have a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet, consist chiefly of moderately deep to deep, moderately well drained to well drained soils that have a moderately fine to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. • Hydrologic group C: Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. • Hydrologic group D: Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. Hydric Soils – A hydric soil is one that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part of the soil profile that supports the growth or regeneration of hydrophytic vegetation. Soils with hydric inclusions have map units dominantly made up of non-hydric soils that may have inclusions of hydric soils in the lower positions on the landscape. Of the soils found onsite, one is classified as hydric soil (152A Drummer silty clay loam), one is classified as non-hydric soil (318C2 Lorenzo loam), and three are classified as non-hydric soil with hydric inclusions likely (219A Millbrook silt loam, 791A Rush silt loam, and 791B Rush silt loam). Prime Farmland – Prime farmland is land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for agricultural production. Prime farmland soils are an important resource to Kendall County and some of the most productive soils in the United States occur locally. Of the soils found onsite, two are designated as prime farmland (791A Rush silt loam and 791B Rush silt loam), two are designated Attachment 11, Page 8 NRI 2504 April 2025 4 as prime farmland if drained (152A Drummer silty clay loam and 219A Millbrook silt loam), and one is designated as farmland of statewide importance (318C2 Lorenzo loam). Soil Limitations – The USDA-NRCS Web Soil Survey rates the limitations of soils for dwellings, small commercial buildings, solar arrays, shallow excavations, lawns/landscaping, local roads and streets, etc. Soils have different properties which influence the development of building sites. The USDA-NRCS classifies soils as Not Limited, Somewhat Limited, and Very Limited. Soils that are Not Limited indicates that the soil has properties that are favorable for the specified use. They will perform well and will have low maintenance. Soils that are Somewhat Limited are moderately favorable, and their limitations can be overcome through special planning, design, or installation. Soils that are Very Limited have features that are unfavorable for the specified use, and their limitations cannot easily be overcome. Table 2: Soil Limitations Soil Type Solar Arrays Shallow Excavations Lawns/ Landscaping Local Roads / Streets 152A Very Limited Very Limited Very Limited Very Limited 219A Very Limited Very Limited Somewhat Limited Very Limited 318C2 Somewhat Limited Somewhat Limited Somewhat Limited Somewhat Limited 791A Very Limited Somewhat Limited Somewhat Limited Very Limited 791B Very Limited Somewhat Limited Somewhat Limited Very Limited Figure 2: Soil Limitations KENDALL COUNTY LAND EVALUATION AND SITE ASSESSMENT (LESA) Decision-makers in Kendall County use the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) system to determine the suitability of a land use change and/or a zoning request as it relates to agricultural land. The LESA system was developed by the United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) and takes into consideration local conditions such as physical characteristics of the land, compatibility of surrounding land-uses, and urban growth factors. The LESA system is a two-step procedure that includes: • Land Evaluation (LE): The soils of a given area are rated and placed in groups ranging from the best to worst suited for a stated agriculture use, cropland, or forestland. The best group is 0 20 40 60 80 100 Solar Arrays Shallow Excavations Lawns/Landscaping Natural Surface Roads % OF SOIL TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT SOIL LIMITATIONS Not Limited Somewhat Limited Very Limited Attachment 11, Page 9 NRI 2504 April 2025 5 assigned a value of 100 and all other groups are assigned lower values. The Land Evaluation is based on data from the Kendall County Soil Survey. The Kendall County Soil and Water Conservation District is responsible for this portion of the LESA system. The Land Evaluation score for this site is 80 out of 100, indicating that the soils are well suited for agricultural uses. • Site Assessment (SA): The site is numerically evaluated according to important factors that contribute to the quality of the site. Each factor selected is assigned values in accordance with the local needs and objectives. The Site Assessment value is based on a 200-point scale and accounts for 2/3 of the total score. The Kendall County LESA Committee is responsible for this portion of the LESA system. The Site Assessment score for this site is 99 out of 200. The LESA Score for this site is 179 out of a possible 300, which indicates a low level of protection for the proposed project site. Selecting the project site with the lowest total points will generally protect the best farmland located in the most viable areas and maintain and promote the agricultural industry in Kendall County. WETLANDS The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s National Wetlands Inventory map indicates the presence of wetland(s)/waters on or near the proposed project site. To determine if a wetland is present, a wetland delineation specialist, who is recognized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, should determine the exact boundaries and value of the wetlands. FLOODPLAIN The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) for Kendall County, Community Panel No. 17093C0035H (effective date January 8, 2014) and 17093C0030G (effective date February 4, 2009) were reviewed to determine the presence of floodplain and floodway areas within the project site. According to the map, the site does not appear to contain areas of regulated floodplain or floodway. SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL Development on this site should include an erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations. Soil erosion on construction sites is a resource concern as suspended sediment from areas undergoing development is a primary nonpoint source of water pollution. Please consult the Illinois Urban Manual (https://illinoisurbanmanual.org/) for appropriate best management practices. STORMWATER POLLUTION A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (Permit No. ILR10) from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) is required for stormwater discharges from construction sites that will disturb 1 or more acres of land. Conditions of the NPDES ILR10 permit require the development and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to reduce stormwater pollutants on the construction site before they can cause environmental issues. Attachment 11, Page 10 NRI 2504 April 2025 6 ECOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS Developers of solar project sites are encouraged to plant native groundcover. Native shrubs, grasses, and wildflowers offer benefits such as improved erosion control, pesticide avoidance, stormwater infiltration, wildlife habitat, and reduced overall maintenance. Naturalized areas, once established, are more drought tolerant, require little to no fertilization, and only need to be mowed once or twice a year. Native fruiting and flowering plants also provide a food source and habitat for native pollinators which offer the ecological service of pollinating our agricultural crops. The district recognizes two potential sources of water pollution from solar farms including cracked panels and oil leaks or spills from transformers. Cracked panels can leach toxic materials if many broken panels are exposed to precipitation over a long period of time. To prevent this issue, solar farm operators should regularly inspect for cracked panels. Cracked or broken panels must be immediately stored under protective cover and should be periodically transported offsite for recycling or proper offsite storage. Electrical transformers are used to increase output voltage from solar farms to the electrical grid. These transformers contain oil, which can leak or spill resulting in environmental damage. To reduce environmental damage, biodegradable oil can be used in the transformers. Larger transformers typically use mineral-based oil unless biodegradable oil is specifically requested. Leaks and spills of biodegradable oil must still be prevented, but the risk for groundwater contamination would be reduced and clean-up efforts simplified in the event of a release. Secondary containment systems such as trays, membranes, or vaults can also be used in the event of a leak or spill. Containment systems must be designed to manage stormwater so adequate containment volume is maintained. This would be the responsibility of the solar developer. Attachment 11, Page 11 Attachment 11, Page 12 Attachment 11, Page 13 NRI 2504 April 2025 9 Figure 4: Aerial Map with NRI Project Boundary Attachment 11, Page 14 NRI 2504 April 2025 10 ARCHAEOLOGIC/CULTURAL RESOURCES INFORMATION Simply stated, cultural resources are all the past activities and accomplishments of people. They include the following: buildings; objects made or used by people; locations; and less tangible resources, such as stories, dance forms, and holiday traditions. The Soil and Water Conservation District most often encounters cultural resources as historical properties. These may be prehistoric or historical sites, buildings, structures, features, or objects. The most common type of historical property that the Soil and Water Conservation District may encounter is non-structural archaeological sites. These sites often extend below the soil surface and must be protected against disruption by development or other earth moving activity if possible. Cultural resources are non- renewable because there is no way to “grow” a site to replace a disrupted site. Landowners with historical properties on their land have ownership of that historical property. However, the State of Illinois owns all the following: human remains, grave markers, burial mounds, and artifacts associated with graves and human remains. Non-grave artifacts from archaeological sites and historical buildings are the property of the landowner. The landowner may choose to disturb a historical property but may not receive federal or state assistance to do so. If an earth moving activity disturbs human remains, the landowner must contact the county coroner within 48 hours. The Illinois State Historic Preservation Office has not been notified of the proposed land use change by the Kendall County SWCD. There may be historic features in the area. The applicant may need to contact them according to current Illinois law. Attachment 11, Page 15 NRI 2504 April 2025 11 ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AREAS WHAT IS BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND WHY SHOULD IT BE CONSERVED?1 Biological diversity, or biodiversity, is the range of life on our planet. A more thorough definition is presented by botanist Peter H. Raven: “At the simplest level, biodiversity is the sum total of all the plants, animals, fungi and microorganisms in the world, or in a particular area; all of their individual variation; and all of the interactions between them. It is the set of living organisms that make up the fabric of the planet Earth and allow it to function as it does, by capturing energy from the sun and using it to drive all of life’s processes; by forming communities of organisms that have, through the several billion years of life’s history on Earth, altered the nature of the atmosphere, the soil and the water of our Planet; and by making possible the sustainability of our planet through their life activities now” (Raven 1994). It is not known how many species occur on our planet. Presently, about 1.4 million species have been named. It has been estimated that there are perhaps 9 million more that have not been identified. What is known is that they are vanishing at an unprecedented rate. Reliable estimates show extinction occurring at a rate several orders of magnitude above “background” in some ecological systems (Wilson 1992, Hoose 1981). The reasons for protecting biological diversity are complex, but they fall into four major categories. First, loss of diversity generally weakens entire natural systems. Healthy ecosystems tend to have many natural checks and balances. Every species plays a role in maintaining this system. When simplified by the loss of diversity, the system becomes more susceptible to natural and artificial perturbations. The chances of a system-wide collapse increase. In parts of the midwestern United States, for example, it was only the remnant areas of natural prairies that kept soil intact during the dust bowl years of the 1930s (Roush 1982). Simplified ecosystems are almost always expensive to maintain. For example, when synthetic chemicals are relied upon to control pests, the target species are not the only ones affected. Their predators are almost always killed or driven away, exasperating the pest problem. In the meantime, people are unintentionally breeding pesticide-resistant pests. A process has begun where people become perpetual guardians of the affected area, which requires the expenditure of financial resources and human ingenuity to keep the system going. A second reason for protecting biological diversity is that it represents one of our greatest untapped resources. Great benefits can be reaped from a single species. About 20 species provide 90% of the world’s food. Of these 20, just three, wheat, maize, and rice-supply over one half of that food. American wheat farmers need new varieties every five to 15 years to compete with pests and diseases. Wild strains of wheat are critical genetic reservoirs for these new varieties. Further, every species is a potential source of human medicine. In 1980, a published report identified the market value of prescription drugs from higher plants at over $3 billion. Organic alkaloids, a class of Attachment 11, Page 16 NRI 2504 April 2025 12 chemical compounds used in medicines, are found in an estimated 20% of plant species. Yet only 2% of plant species have been screened for these compounds (Hoose 1981). The third reason for protecting diversity is that humans benefit from natural areas and depend on healthy ecosystems. The natural world supplies our air, our water, our food and supports human economic activity. Further, humans are creatures that evolved in a diverse natural environment between forest and grasslands. People need to be reassured that such places remain. When people speak of “going to the country,” they generally mean more than getting out of town. For reasons of their own sanity and wellbeing, they need a holistic, organic experience. Prolonged exposure to urban monotony produces neuroses, for which cultural and natural diversity cure. Historically, the lack of attention to biological diversity, and the ecological processes it supports, has resulted in economic hardships for segments of the basin’s human population. The final reason for protecting biological diversity is that species and natural systems are intrinsically valuable. The above reasons have focused on the benefits of the natural world to humans. All things possess intrinsic value simply because they exist. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES CONCERNING THE SUBJECT PARCEL As part of the Natural Resources Information Report, staff checks office maps to determine if any nature preserves or ecologically sensitive areas are in the general vicinity of the parcel in question. If there is a nature preserve in the area, then that resource will be identified as part of the report. The SWCD recommends that every effort be made to protect that resource. Such efforts should include, but are not limited to erosion control, sediment control, stormwater management, and groundwater monitoring. ______________________________________________________________________________ 1Taken from The Conservation of Biological Diversity in the Great Lakes Ecosystem: Issues and Opportunities, prepared by the Nature Conservancy Great Lakes Program 79W. Monroe Street, Suite 1309, Chicago, IL 60603, January 1994. Office maps indicate that there are no nature preserves in the vicinity of the parcel in question (PIQ). Adjacent to the PIQ is a mapped freshwater emergent wetland to the north and a mapped freshwater pond to the south. These are ecologically sensitive areas. Attachment 11, Page 17 NRI 2504 April 2025 13 SOILS INFORMATION IMPORTANCE OF SOILS INFORMATION Soils information comes from the Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Maps and Descriptions for Kendall County. This information is important to all parties involved in determining the suitability of the proposed land use change. Each soil polygon is given a number, which represents its soil type. The letter found after the soil type number indicates the soils slope class. Each soil map unit has limitations for a variety of land uses such as septic systems, buildings with basements, and buildings without basements. It is important to remember that soils do not function independently of each other. The behavior of a soil depends upon the physical properties of adjacent soil types, the presence of artificial drainage, soil compaction, and its position in the local landscape. The limitation categories (not limited, somewhat limited, or very limited) indicate the potential for difficulty in using that soil unit for the proposed activity and, thus, the degree of need for thorough soil borings and engineering studies. A limitation does not necessarily mean that the proposed activity cannot be done on that soil type. It does mean that the reasons for the limitation need to be thoroughly understood and dealt with to complete the proposed activity successfully. Very limited indicates that the proposed activity will be more difficult and costly to do on that soil type than on a soil type with a somewhat limited or not limited rating. Soil survey interpretations are predictions of soil behavior for specified land uses and specified management practices. They are based on the soil properties that directly influence the specified use of the soil. Soil survey interpretations allow users of soil surveys to plan reasonable alternatives for the use and management of soils. Soil interpretations do not eliminate the need for on-site study and testing of specific sites for the design and construction for specific uses. They can be used as a guide for planning more detailed investigations and for avoiding undesirable sites for an intended use. The scale of the maps and the range of error limit the use of the soil delineation. Attachment 11, Page 18 NRI 2504 April 2025 14 Figure 5: Soil Map Table 3: Soil Map Unit Descriptions Soil Type Soil Name Acres Percent 152A Drummer silty clay loam, 0-2% slopes 1.9 9.0% 219A Millbrook silt loam, 0-2% slopes 1.2 5.8% 318C2 Lorenzo loam, 4-6% slopes, eroded 2.1 10.1% 791A Rush silt loam, 0-2% slopes 7.5 36.1% 791B Rush silt loam, 2-4% slopes 8.1 39.0% Source: National Cooperative Soil Survey – USDA-NRCS Attachment 11, Page 19 NRI 2504 April 2025 15 SOILS INTERPRETATIONS EXPLANATION GENERAL – NONAGRICULTURAL These interpretative ratings help engineers, planners, and others to understand how soil properties influence behavior when used for nonagricultural uses such as building site development or construction materials. This report gives ratings for proposed uses in terms of limitations and restrictive features. The tables list only the most restrictive features. Other features may need treatment to overcome soil limitations for a specific purpose. Ratings come from the soil's "natural" state, that is, no unusual modification occurs other than that which is considered normal practice for the rated use. Even though soils may have limitations, an engineer may alter soil features or adjust building plans for a structure to compensate for most degrees of limitations. Most of these practices, however, are costly. The final decision in selecting a site for a particular use generally involves weighing the costs for site preparation and maintenance. Soil properties influence development of building sites, including the selection of the site, the design of the structure, construction, performance after construction, and maintenance. Soil limitation ratings of not limited, somewhat limited, and very limited are given for the types of proposed improvements that are listed or inferred by the petitioner as entered on the report application and/or zoning petition. The most common types of building limitation that this report gives limitations ratings for is septic systems. It is understood that engineering practices can overcome most limitations for buildings with and without basements, and small commercial buildings. Limitation ratings for these types of buildings are not commonly provided. Organic soils, when present on the parcel, are referenced in the hydric soils section of the report. This type of soil is considered unsuitable for all types of construction. LIMIATIONS RATINGS • Not Limited: This soil has favorable properties for the use. The degree of limitation is minor. The people involved can expect good performance and low maintenance. • Somewhat Limited: This soil has moderately favorable properties for the use. Special planning, design, or maintenance can overcome this degree of limitation. During some part of the year, the expected performance is less desirable than for soils rated slight. • Very Limited: This soil has one or more properties that are unfavorable for the rated use. These may include the following: steep slopes, bedrock near the surface, flooding, high shrink-swell potential, a seasonal high water table, or low strength. This degree of limitation generally requires major soil reclamation, special design, or intensive maintenance, which in most situations is difficult and costly. Attachment 11, Page 20 NRI 2504 April 2025 16 BUILDING LIMITATIONS BUILDING ON POORLY SUITED OR UNSUITABLE SOILS Building on poorly suited or unsuitable soils can present problems to future property owners such as cracked foundations, wet basements, lowered structural integrity and high maintenance costs associated with these problems. The staff of the Kendall County SWCD strongly urges scrutiny by the plat reviewers when granting parcels with these soils exclusively. Solar Arrays, Soil-Penetrating Anchor Systems – Ground-based solar arrays are sets of photovoltaic panels that are not situated on a building or pole. These installations consist of a racking system that holds the panel in the desired orientation and the foundation structures that hold the racking system to the ground. Two basic methods are used to hold the systems to the ground, based on site conditions and cost. One method employs driven piles, screw augers, or concrete piers that penetrate the soil to provide a stable foundation. Shallow Excavations – Trenches or holes dug to a maximum depth of 5 or 6 feet for utility lines, open ditches, or other purposes. Ratings are based on soil properties that influence the ease of digging and the resistance to sloughing. Lawns and Landscaping – Require soils on which turf and ornamental trees and shrubs can be established and maintained (irrigation is not considered in the ratings). The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect plant growth and trafficability after vegetation is established. Local Roads and Streets – They have an all-weather surface and carry automobile and light truck traffic all year. They have a subgrade of cut or fill soil material, a base of gravel, crushed rock or soil material stabilized by lime or cement; and a surface of flexible material (asphalt), rigid material (concrete) or gravel with a binder. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect the ease of excavation and grading and the traffic-supporting capacity. Attachment 11, Page 21 NRI 2504 April 2025 17 Table 4: Building Limitations Soil Type Solar Arrays Shallow Excavations Lawns & Landscaping Local Roads & Streets Acres % 152A Very Limited: Ponding Depth to saturated zone Frost action Low strength Steel corrosion Shrink-swell Very Limited: Ponding Depth to saturated zone Dusty Unstable excavation walls Too clayey Very Limited: Ponding Depth to saturated zone Dusty Very Limited: Ponding Depth to saturated zone Frost action Low strength Shrink-swell 1.9 9.0% 219A Very Limited: Frost action Depth to saturated zone Steel corrosion Shrink-swell Hillslope position Ponding Low strength Very Limited: Depth to saturated zone Dusty Unstable excavation walls Ponding Somewhat Limited: Depth to saturated zone Dusty Very Limited: Frost action Depth to saturated zone Shrink-swell Low strength Ponding 1.2 5.8% 318C2 Somewhat Limited: Steel corrosion Frost action Hillslope position Depth to saturated zone Shrink-swell Low strength Somewhat Limited: Unstable excavation walls Dusty Somewhat Limited: Droughty Dusty Depth to saturated zone Somewhat Limited: Frost action Depth to saturated zone Low strength Shrink swell 2.1 10.1% 791A Very Limited: Frost action Steel corrosion Low strength Shrink-swell Hillslope position Ponding Depth to saturated zone Somewhat Limited: Dusty Unstable excavation walls Somewhat Limited: Dusty Very Limited: Frost action Low strength Shrink-swell Ponding Depth to saturated zone 7.5 36.1% Attachment 11, Page 22 Attachment 11, Page 23 Attachment 11, Page 24 Attachment 11, Page 25 Attachment 11, Page 26 NRI 2504 April 2025 22 SOIL WATER FEATURES Table 5, below, gives estimates of various soil water features that should be taken into consideration when reviewing engineering for a land use project. HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUPS (HSGs) – The groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. • Group A: Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. • Group B: Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained, or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. • Group C: Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. • Group D: Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. Note: If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D or C/D) the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. SURFACE RUNOFF – Surface runoff refers to the loss of water from an area by flow over the land surface. Surface runoff classes are based upon slope, climate and vegetative cover and indicates relative runoff for very specific conditions (it is assumed that the surface of the soil is bare and that the retention of surface water resulting from irregularities in the ground surface is minimal). The classes are negligible, very low, low, medium, high, and very high. MONTHS – The portion of the year in which a water table, ponding, and/or flooding is most likely to be a concern. WATER TABLE – Water table refers to a saturated zone in the soil and the data indicates, by month, depth to the top (upper limit) and base (lower limit) of the saturated zone in most years. These estimates are based upon observations of the water table at selected sites and on evidence of a saturated zone (grayish colors or mottles (redoximorphic features)) in the soil. Note: A saturated zone that lasts for less than a month is not considered a water table. PONDING – Ponding refers to standing water in a closed depression, and the data indicates surface water depth, duration, and frequency of ponding. Attachment 11, Page 27 NRI 2504 April 2025 23 • Duration: Expressed as very brief if less than 2 days, brief if 2 to 7 days, long if 7 to 30 days and very long if more than 30 days. • Frequency: Expressed as: none meaning ponding is not possible; rare means unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions (chance of ponding is 0-5% in any year); occasional means that it occurs, on the average, once or less in 2 years (chance of ponding is 5 to 50% in any year); and frequent means that it occurs, on the average, more than once in 2 years (chance of ponding is more than 50% in any year). FLOODING – The temporary inundation of an area caused by overflowing streams, by runoff from adjacent slopes, or by tides. Water standing for short periods after rainfall or snowmelt is not considered flooding, and water standing in swamps and marshes is considered ponding rather than flooding. • Duration: Expressed as: extremely brief if 0.1 hour to 4 hours; very brief if 4 hours to 2 days; brief if 2 to 7 days; long if 7 to 30 days; and very long if more than 30 days. • Frequency: Expressed as: none means flooding is not probable; very rare means that it is very unlikely but possible under extremely unusual weather conditions (chance of flooding is less than 1% in any year); rare means that it is unlikely but possible under unusual weather conditions (chance of flooding is 1 to 5% in any year); occasional means that it occurs infrequently under normal weather conditions (chance of flooding is 5 to 50% in any year but is less than 50% in all months in any year); and very frequent means that it is likely to occur very often under normal weather conditions (chance of flooding is more than 50% in all months of any year). Note: The information is based on evidence in the soil profile. In addition, consideration is also given to local information about the extent and levels of flooding and the relation of each soil on the landscape to historic floods. Information on the extent of flooding based on soil data is less specific than that provided by detailed engineering surveys that delineate flood-prone areas at specific flood frequency levels. Table 5: Water Features Soil Type Hydrologic Group Surface Runoff Water Table Ponding Flooding 152A B/D Negligible January – May Upper Limit: 0.0’-1.0’ Lower Limit: 6.0’ January – May Surface Water Depth: 0.0’-0.5’ Duration: Brief (2-7 days) Frequency: Frequent January – December Frequency: None 219A C/D Low January – May Upper Limit: 0.5’-2.0’ Lower Limit: 6.0’ January – December Frequency: None January – December Frequency: None 318C2 B Medium January – December Upper Limit: -- Lower Limit: -- January – December Frequency: None January – December Frequency: None 791A B Low January – December Upper Limit: -- Lower Limit: -- January – December Frequency: None January – December Frequency: None 791B B Low January – December Upper Limit: -- Lower Limit: -- January – December Frequency: None January – December Frequency: None Attachment 11, Page 28 NRI 2504 April 2025 24 SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Erosion is the wearing away of the soil by water, wind, and other forces. Soil erosion threatens the Nation's soil productivity and contributes the most pollutants in our waterways. Water causes about two thirds of erosion on agricultural land. Four properties, mainly, determine a soil's erodibility: texture, slope, structure, and organic matter content. Slope has the most influence on soil erosion potential when the site is under construction. Erosivity and runoff increase as slope grade increases. The runoff then exerts more force on the particles, breaking their bonds more readily and carrying them farther before deposition. The longer water flows along a slope before reaching a major waterway, the greater the potential for erosion. Soil erosion during and after this proposed construction can be a primary non-point source of water pollution. Eroded soil during the construction phase can create unsafe conditions on roadways, decrease the storage capacity of lakes, clog streams and drainage channels, cause deterioration of aquatic habitats, and increase water treatment costs. Soil erosion also increases the risk of flooding by choking culverts, ditches, and storm sewers and by reducing the capacity of natural and man-made detention facilities. The general principles of erosion and sedimentation control measures include: • Reducing/diverting flow from exposed areas, storing flows, or limiting runoff from exposed areas • Staging construction to keep disturbed areas to a minimum • Establishing or maintaining temporary or permanent groundcover • Retaining sediment on site • Properly installing, inspecting, and maintaining control measures Erosion control practices are useful controls only if they are properly located, installed, inspected, and maintained. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plans, including maintenance responsibilities, should be clearly communicated to all contractors working on the site. The SWCD recommends an erosion and sediment control plan for all building sites, especially if there is a wetland or stream nearby. Additionally, a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (Permit No. ILR10) from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) is required for stormwater discharges from construction sites that will disturb 1 or more acres of land. Conditions of the NPDES ILR10 permit require the development and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to reduce stormwater pollutants on the construction site before they can cause environmental issues. Table 6: Soil Erosion Potential Soil Type Slope Rating Acreage Percent of Project Area 152A 0-2% Slight 1.9 9.0% 219A 0-2% Slight 1.2 5.8% 318C2 4-6% Moderate 2.1 10.1% 791A 0-2% Slight 7.5 36.1% 791B 2-4% Slight 8.1 39.0% Attachment 11, Page 29 NRI 2504 April 2025 25 PRIME FARMLAND SOILS Prime farmland soils are an important resource to Kendall County. Some of the most productive soils in the United States occur locally. Each soil map unit in the United States is assigned a prime or non-prime rating. Prime agricultural land does not need to be in the production of food & fiber. Section 310 of the NRCS general manual states that urban or built-up land on prime farmland soils is not prime farmland. The percentages of soil map units on the parcel reflect the determination that urban or built-up land on prime farmland soils is not prime farmland. Table 7: Prime Farmland Soils Soil Type Prime Designation Acreage Percent 152A Prime Farmland if Drained 1.9 9.0% 219A Prime Farmland if Drained 1.2 5.8% 318C2 Farmland of Statewide Importance 2.1 10.1% 791A Prime Farmland 7.5 36.1% 791B Prime Farmland 8.1 39.0% % Prime Farmland 89.9% Figure 7: Prime Farmland Soils Attachment 11, Page 30 NRI 2504 April 2025 26 LAND EVALUATION AND SITE ASSESSMENT (LESA) Decision-makers in Kendall County use the Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) system to determine the suitability of a land use change and/or a zoning request as it relates to agricultural land. The LESA system was developed by the United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) and takes into consideration local conditions such as physical characteristics of the land, compatibility of surrounding land-uses, and urban growth factors. The LESA system is a two-step procedure that includes: LAND EVALUATION (LE) The soils of a given area are rated and placed in groups ranging from the best to worst suited for a stated agriculture use, cropland, or forestland. The best group is assigned a value of 100, and all other groups are assigned lower values. The Land Evaluation is based on data from the Kendall County Soil Survey. The LE score is calculated by multiplying the relative value of each soil type by the number of acres of that soil. The sum of the products is then divided by the total number of acres; the answer is the Land Evaluation score on this site. The Kendall County Soil and Water Conservation District is responsible for this portion of the LESA system. SITE ASSESSMENT (SA) The site is numerically evaluated according to important factors that contribute to the quality of the site. Each factor selected is assigned values in accordance with the local needs and objectives. The value group is a predetermined value based upon prime farmland designation. The Kendall County LESA Committee is responsible for this portion of the LESA system. Please Note: A land evaluation (LE) score will be compiled for every project parcel. However, when a parcel is located within municipal planning boundaries, a site assessment (SA) score is not compiled as the scoring factors are not applicable. As a result, only the LE score is available, and a full LESA score is unavailable for the parcel. Table 8A: Land Evaluation Computation Soil Type Value Group Relative Value Acres* Product (Relative Value x Acres) 152A 1 100 1.9 190.0 219A 3 87 1.2 104.4 318C2 6 69 2.1 144.9 791A 4 79 7.5 592.5 791B 4 79 8.1 639.9 20.8 1,671.7 LE Calculation (Product of relative value / Total Acres) 1,671.7 / 20.8 = 80.4 LE Score LE = 80 *Acreage listed in this chart provides a generalized representation and may not precisely reflect exact acres of each soil type. Attachment 11, Page 31 NRI 2504 April 2025 27 The Land Evaluation score for this site is 80, indicating that the soils on this site are designated as land that is well suited for agricultural uses considering the Land Evaluation score is at or above 80. Table 8B: Site Assessment Computation A. Agricultural Land Uses Points 1. Percentage of area in agricultural uses within 1.5 miles of site. (20-10-5-0) 5 2. Current land use adjacent to site. (30-20-15-10-0) 15 3. Percentage of site in agricultural production in any of the last 5 years. (20-15-10-5-0) 20 4. Size of site. (30-15-10-0) 10 B. Compatibility / Impact on Uses 1. Distance from city or village limits. (20-10-0) 0 2. Consistency of proposed use with County Land Resource Management Concept Plan and/or municipal comprehensive land use plan. (20-10-0) 20 3. Compatibility of agricultural and non-agricultural uses. (15-7-0) 0 C. Existence of Infrastructure 1. Availability of public sewage system. (10-8-6-0) 8 2. Availability of public water system. (10-8-6-0) 8 3. Transportation systems. (15-7-0) 7 4. Distance from fire protection service. (10-8-6-2-0) 6 Site Assessment Score: 99 Land Evaluation Value: 80 + Site Assessment Value: 99 = LESA Score: 179 Table 9: LESA Score Summary LESA SCORE LEVEL OF PROTECTION 0-200 Low 201-225 Medium 226-250 High 251-300 Very High The LESA Score for this site is 179 which indicates a low level of protection for the proposed project site. Selecting the project site with the lowest total points will generally protect the best farmland located in the most viable areas and maintain and promote the agricultural industry in Kendall County. Attachment 11, Page 32 NRI 2504 April 2025 28 LAND USE PLANS Many counties, municipalities, villages, and townships have developed land-use plans. These plans are intended to reflect the existing and future land-use needs of a given community. Please contact Kendall County for information regarding their comprehensive land use plan and map. DRAINAGE, RUNOFF, AND FLOOD INFORMATION U.S.G.S Topographic maps give information on elevations, which are important mostly to determine slopes, drainage directions, and watershed information. Elevations determine the area of impact of floods of record. Slope information determines steepness and erosion potential. Drainage directions determine where water leaves the PIQ, possibly impacting surrounding natural resources. Watershed information is given for changing land use to a subdivision type of development on parcels greater than 10 acres. WHAT IS A WATERSHED? Simply stated, a watershed is the area of land that contributes water to a certain point. The watershed boundary is important because the area of land in the watershed can now be calculated using an irregular shape area calculator such as a dot counter or planimeter. Using regional storm event information, and site-specific soils and land use information, the peak stormwater flow through the point marked “” for a specified storm event can be calculated. This value is called a “Q” value (for the given storm event) and is measured in cubic feet per second (CFS). When construction occurs, the Q value naturally increases because of the increase in impermeable surfaces. This process decreases the ability of soils to accept and temporarily hold water. Therefore, more water runs off and increases the Q value. Theoretically, if each development, no matter how large or small, maintains their preconstruction Q value after construction by the installation of stormwater management systems, the streams and wetlands and lakes will not suffer damage from excessive urban stormwater. For this reason, the Kendall County SWCD recommends that the developer for intense uses, such as a subdivision, calculate the preconstruction Q value for the exit point(s). A stormwater management system Attachment 11, Page 33 NRI 2504 April 2025 29 should be designed, installed, and maintained to limit the postconstruction Q value to be at or below the preconstruction value. IMPORTANCE OF FLOOD INFORMATION A floodplain is defined as land adjoining a watercourse (riverine) or an inland depression (non-riverine) that is subject to periodic inundation by high water. Floodplains are important areas demanding protection since they have water storage and conveyance functions which affect upstream and downstream flows, water quality and quantity, and suitability of the land for human activity. Since floodplains play distinct and vital roles in the hydrologic cycle, development that interferes with their hydrologic and biologic functions should be carefully considered. Flooding is both dangerous to people and destructive to their properties. The following maps, when combined with wetland and topographic information, can help developers and future homeowners to “sidestep” potential flooding or ponding problems. Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), produced by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), define flood elevation adjacent to tributaries and major bodies of water and superimpose that onto a simplified USGS topographic map. The scale of the FIRM maps is generally dependent on the size and density of parcels in that area. This is to correctly determine the parcel location and floodplain location. The FIRM map has three (3) zones. Zone A includes the 100-year flood (1% annual chance flood), Zone B or Zone X (shaded) is the 100 to 500-year flood (between limits of the 1% and the 0.2% annual chance flood), and Zone C or Zone X (unshaded) is outside the floodplain (outside the 0.2% annual chance flood). The Hydrologic Atlas (H.A.) Series of the Flood of Record Map is also used for the topographic information. This map is different from the FIRM map mainly because it will show isolated or pocketed flooded areas. Kendall County uses both these maps in conjunction with each other for flooded area determinations. The Flood of Record maps show the areas of flood for various years. Both maps stress that the recurrence of flooding is merely statistical. A 100-year flood may occur twice in one year, or twice in one week, for that matter. It should be noted that greater floods than those shown on the two maps are possible. The flood boundaries indicated provide a historic record only until the map publication date. Additionally, these flood boundaries are a function of the watershed conditions existing when the maps were produced. Cumulative changes in runoff characteristics caused by urbanization can result in an increase in flood height of future flood episodes. Floodplains play a vital role in reducing the flood damage potential associated with an urbanizing area and, when left in an undisturbed state, also provide valuable wildlife habitat benefits. If it is the petitioner's intent to conduct floodplain filling or modification activities, the petitioner, and the Unit of Government responsible need to consider the potentially adverse effects this type of action could have on adjacent properties. The change or loss of natural floodplain storage often increases the frequency and severity of flooding on adjacent property. Attachment 11, Page 34 NRI 2504 April 2025 30 If the available maps indicate the presence of a floodplain on the PIQ, the petitioner should contact the IDNR-OWR and FEMA to delineate a floodplain elevation for the parcel. If a portion of the property is indeed floodplain, applicable state, county, and local regulations will need to be reflected in the site plans. Another indication of flooding potential can be found in the soils information. Hydric soils indicate the presence of drainage ways, areas subject to ponding, or a naturally occurring high water table. These need to be considered along with the floodplain information when developing the site plan and the stormwater management plan. Development on hydric soils can contribute to the loss of water storage within the soil and the potential for increased flooding in the area. Figure 8: Flood Map Attachment 11, Page 35 NRI 2504 April 2025 31 Figure 9: Topographic Map This parcel contains slopes of 0% to 6% with an elevation range of approximately 642’-654’ above sea level. The highest point is in the northwest portion of the site, and the lowest point is along the northern boundary. According to the FEMA Flood Map (Figure 8), the parcel does not appear to contain areas of regulated floodplain or floodway. The parcel is mapped as Zone X (unshaded), an area of minimal flood hazard determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. Attachment 11, Page 36 Attachment 11, Page 37 NRI 2504 April 2025 33 WETLAND INFORMATION IMPORTANCE OF WETLAND INFORMATION Wetlands function in many ways to provide numerous benefits to society. They control flooding by offering a slow release of excess water downstream or through the soil. They cleanse water by filtering out sediment and some pollutants and can function as rechargers of our valuable groundwater. They also are essential breeding, rearing, and feeding grounds for many species of wildlife. These benefits are particularly valuable in urbanizing areas as development activity typically adversely affects water quality, increases the volume of stormwater runoff, and increases the demand for groundwater. In an area where many individual homes rely on shallow groundwater wells for domestic water supplies, activities that threaten potential groundwater recharge areas are contrary to the public good. The conversion of wetlands, with their sediment trapping and nutrient absorbing vegetation, to biologically barren stormwater detention ponds can cause additional degradation of water quality in downstream or adjacent areas. It has been estimated that over 95% of the wetlands that were historically present in Illinois have been destroyed while only recently has the true environmental significance of wetlands been fully recognized. America is losing 100,000 acres of wetland a year and has saved 5 million acres total (since 1934). One acre of wetland can filter 7.3 million gallons of water a year. These are reasons why our wetlands are high quality and important. This section contains the National Wetlands Inventory, which is the most comprehensive inventory to date. The National Wetlands Inventory is reproduced from an aerial photo at a scale of 1” equals 660 feet. The NRCS developed these maps in cooperation with U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency,) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, using the National Food Security Act Manual, 3rd Edition. The main purpose of these maps is to determine wetland areas on agricultural fields and areas that may be wetlands but are in a non-agriculture setting. The National Wetlands Inventory in no way gives an exact delineation of the wetlands, but merely an outline, or the determination that there is a wetland within the outline. For the final, most accurate wetland determination of a specific wetland, a wetland delineation must be certified by NRCS staff using the National Food Security Act Manual (on agricultural land.) On urban land, a certified wetland delineator must perform the delineation using the ACOE 1987 Manual. See the glossary section for the definitions of “delineation” and “determination.” Attachment 11, Page 38 NRI 2504 April 2025 34 Figure 11: Wetland Map Office maps indicate that mapped wetlands/waters are not present on the parcel in question (PIQ). To determine the presence of wetlands, a wetland delineation specialist, who is recognized by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, should determine the exact boundaries and value of the wetlands. Attachment 11, Page 39 NRI 2504 April 2025 35 HYDRIC SOILS Soils information gives another indication of flooding potential. The soils map on the following page indicates the soil(s) on the parcel that the Natural Resources Conservation Service indicates as hydric. Hydric soils, by definition, have seasonal high water at or near the soil surface and/or have potential flooding or ponding problems. All hydric soils range from poorly suited to unsuitable for building. One group of the hydric soils are the organic soils, which formed from dead organic material. Organic soils are unsuitable for building because of not only the high water table but also their subsidence problems. It is important to add the possibility of hydric inclusions in a soil type. An inclusion is a soil polygon that is too small to appear on these maps. While relatively insignificant for agricultural use, hydric soil inclusions become more important to more intense uses such as a residential subdivision. While considering hydric soils and hydric inclusions, it is noteworthy to mention that subsurface agriculture drainage tile occurs in almost all poorly drained and somewhat poorly drained soils. Drainage tile expedites drainage and facilitates farming. It is imperative that these drainage tiles remain undisturbed. A damaged subsurface drainage tile may return original hydrologic conditions to all the areas that drained through the tile (ranging from less than one acre to many square miles.) For an intense land use, the Kendall County SWCD recommends the following: a topographical survey with 1 foot contour intervals to accurately define the flood area on the parcel, an intensive soil survey to define most accurately the locations of the hydric soils and inclusions, and a drainage tile survey on the area to locate the tiles that must be preserved to maintain subsurface drainage. Table 10: Hydric Soils Soil Types Drainage Class Hydric Designation Hydric Inclusions Likely Hydric Rating % Acreage Percent 152A Poorly Drained Hydric N/A 100% 1.9 9.0% 219A Somewhat Poorly Drained Non-Hydric Yes 3% 1.2 5.8% 318C2 Well Drained Non-Hydric No 0% 2.1 10.1% 791A Well Drained Non-Hydric Yes 6% 7.5 36.1% 791B Well Drained Non-Hydric Yes 6% 8.1 39.0% Attachment 11, Page 40 NRI 2504 April 2025 36 Figure 12: Hydric Soil Map Attachment 11, Page 41 NRI 2504 April 2025 37 WETLAND AND FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS The laws of the United States and the State of Illinois assign certain agencies specific and different regulatory roles to protect the waters within the State's boundaries. These roles, when considered together, include protection of navigation channels and harbors, protection against floodway encroachments, maintenance and enhancement of water quality, protection of fish and wildlife habitat and recreational resources, and, in general, the protection of total public interest. Unregulated use of the waters within the State of Illinois could permanently destroy or alter the character of these valuable resources and adversely impact the public. Therefore, please contact the proper regulatory authorities when planning any work associated with Illinois waters so that proper consideration and approval can be obtained. WHO MUST APPLY? Anyone proposing to dredge, fill, rip rap, or otherwise alter the banks or beds of, or construct, operate, or maintain any dock, pier, wharf, sluice, dam, piling, wall, fence, utility, floodplain or floodway subject to State or Federal regulatory jurisdiction should apply for agency approvals. REGULATORY AGENCIES • Wetland or U.S. Waters: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District, 231 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1500, Chicago, IL 60604. Phone: (312) 846-5530 • Floodplains: Illinois Department of Natural Resources - Office of Water Resources, One Natural Resources Way, Springfield, IL 62702-1270. Phone: (217) 782-6302 • Water Quality/Erosion Control: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, 1021 North Grand Avenue East, P.O. Box 19276, Springfield, IL 62794-9276. Phone: (217) 782-3397 COORDINATION We recommend early coordination with the regulatory agencies BEFORE finalizing work plans. This allows the agencies to recommend measures to mitigate or compensate for adverse impacts. Also, the agency can make possible environmental enhancement provisions early in the project planning stages. This could reduce time required to process necessary approvals. PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING IF YOU ARE PLANNING TO DO ANY WORK NEAR A STREAM (THIS INCLUDES SMALL UNNAMED STREAMS), LAKE, WETLAND OR FLOODWAY. CAUTION: Contact with the United States Army Corps of Engineers is strongly advised before commencement of any work in or near a Waters of the United States. This could save considerable time and expense. Persons responsible for willful and direct violation of Section 10 of the River and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899 or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act are subject to fines ranging up to $16,000 per day of violation, with a maximum cap of $187,500 in any single enforcement action, as well as criminal enforcement. Attachment 11, Page 42 NRI 2504 April 2025 38 GLOSSARY AGRICULTURAL PROTECTION AREAS (AG AREAS) - Allowed by P.A. 81-1173. An AG AREA consists of a minimum of 350 acres of farmland, as contiguous and compact as possible. Petitioned by landowners, AG AREAS protect for a period of ten years initially, then reviewed every eight years thereafter. AG AREA establishment exempts landowners from local nuisance ordinances directed at farming operations, and designated land cannot receive special tax assessments on public improvements that do not benefit the land, e.g. water and sewer lines. AGRICULTURE - The growing, harvesting and storing of crops including legumes, hay, grain, fruit and truck or vegetable including dairying, poultry, swine, sheep, beef cattle, pony and horse production, fur farms, and fish and wildlife farms; farm buildings used for growing, harvesting and preparing crop products for market, or for use on the farm; roadside stands, farm buildings for storing and protecting farm machinery and equipment from the elements, for housing livestock or poultry and for preparing livestock or poultry products for market; farm dwellings occupied by farm owners, operators, tenants or seasonal or year around hired farm workers. BEDROCK - Indicates depth at which bedrock occurs. Also lists hardness as rippable or hard. FLOODING - Indicates frequency, duration, and period during year when floods are likely to occur. HIGH WATER TABLE - A seasonal high water table is a zone of saturation at the highest average depth during the wettest part of the year. May be apparent, perched, or artesian kinds of water tables. • Water table, Apparent: A thick zone of free water in the soil. An apparent water table is indicated by the level at which water stands in an uncased borehole after adequate time is allowed for adjustment in the surrounding soil. • Water table, Artesian: A water table under hydrostatic head, generally beneath an impermeable layer. When this layer is penetrated, the water level rises in an uncased borehole. • Water table, Perched: A water table standing above an unsaturated zone. In places an upper, or perched, water table is separated from a lower one by a dry zone. DELINEATION - For Wetlands: A series of pink or orange flags placed on the ground by a certified professional that outlines the wetland boundary on a parcel. DETERMINATION - A polygon drawn on a map using map information that gives an outline of a wetland. HYDRIC SOIL - This type of soil is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service 1987). INTENSIVE SOIL MAPPING - Mapping done on a smaller more intensive scale than a modern soil survey to determine soil properties of a specific site, e.g. mapping for septic suitability. Attachment 11, Page 43 NRI 2504 April 2025 39 LAND EVALUATION AND SITE ASSESSMENT (L.E.S.A.) - LESA is a systematic approach for evaluating a parcel of land and to determine a numerical value for the parcel for farmland preservation purposes. MODERN SOIL SURVEY - A soil survey is a field investigation of the soils of a specific area, supported by information from other sources. The kinds of soil in the survey area are identified and their extent shown on a map, and an accompanying report describes, defines, classifies, and interprets the soils. Interpretations predict the behavior of the soils under different used and the soils' response to management. Predictions are made for areas of soil at specific places. Soils information collected in a soil survey is useful in developing land-use plans and alternatives involving soil management systems and in evaluating and predicting the effects of land use. PERMEABILITY - Values listed estimate the range (in rate and time) it takes for downward movement of water in the major soil layers when saturated but allowed to drain freely. The estimates are based on soil texture, soil structure, available data on permeability and infiltration tests, and observation of water movement through soils or other geologic materials. PIQ - Parcel in question POTENTIAL FROST ACTION - Damage that may occur to structures and roads due to ice lens formation causing upward and lateral soil movement. Based primarily on soil texture and wetness. PRIME FARMLAND - Prime farmland soils are lands that are best suited to food, feed, forage, fiber and oilseed crops. It may be cropland, pasture, woodland, or other land, but it is not urban and built up land or water areas. It either is used for food or fiber or is available for those uses. The soil qualities, growing season, and moisture supply are those needed for a well-managed soil economically to produce a sustained high yield of crops. Prime farmland produces in highest yields with minimum inputs of energy and economic resources and farming the land results in the least damage to the environment. Prime farmland has an adequate and dependable supply of moisture from precipitation or irrigation. The temperature and growing season are favorable. The level of acidity or alkalinity is acceptable. Prime farmland has few or no rocks and is permeable to water and air. It is not excessively erodible or saturated with water for long periods and is not frequently flooded during the growing season. The slope ranges mainly from 0 to 5 percent (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service). SEASONAL - When used in reference to wetlands indicates that the area is flooded only during a portion of the year. SHRINK-SWELL POTENTIAL - Indicates volume changes to be expected for the specific soil material with changes in moisture content. SOIL MAPPING UNIT - A map unit is a collection of soil areas of miscellaneous areas delineated in mapping. A map unit is generally an aggregate of the delineations of many different bodies of a kind of soil or miscellaneous area but may consist of only one delineated body. Taxonomic class names and accompanying phase terms are used to name soil map units. They are described in terms of ranges of soil properties within the limits defined for taxa and in terms of ranges of taxadjuncts and inclusions. Attachment 11, Page 44 NRI 2504 April 2025 40 SOIL SERIES - A group of soils, formed from a particular type of parent material, having horizons that, except for texture of the A or surface horizon, are similar in all profile characteristics and in arrangement in the soil profile. Among these characteristics are color, texture, structure, reaction, consistence, and mineralogical and chemical composition. SUBSIDENCE - Applies mainly to organic soils after drainage. Soil material subsides due to shrinkage and oxidation. TOPSOIL - That portion of the soil profile where higher concentrations of organic material, fertility, bacterial activity and plant growth take place. Depths of topsoil vary between soil types. WATERSHED - An area of land that drains to an associated water resource such as a wetland, river or lake. Depending on the size and topography, watersheds can contain numerous tributaries, such as streams and ditches, and ponding areas such as detention structures, natural ponds and wetlands. WETLAND - An area that has a predominance of hydric soils and that is inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient enough to support, and under normal circumstances does support, a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Attachment 11, Page 45 NRI 2504 April 2025 41 REFERENCES Association of Illinois Soil & Water Conservation Districts. 2020. Illinois Urban Manual. Berg, R. C., and J. P. Kempton. 1984. Potential for contamination of shallow aquifers from land burial of municipal wastes: Champaign, Illinois, Illinois State Geological Survey map, scale 1:500,000. Clean Water Act of 1972, Sections 309 and 404. Federal Emergency Management Agency. National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) Viewer. https://hazards- fema.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8b0adb51996444d4879338b5529aa 9cd. Accessed February 2025. Illinois State Geological Survey, Department of Natural Resources. 2021. Geologic Road Map of Illinois. Kendall County Department of Planning Building and Zoning and Kendall County Soil and Water Conservation District In cooperation with NRCS, USDA. Land Evaluation and Site Assessment System. Kendall County. 2023. Land Resource Management Plan Map. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. General Manual, Title 310, Land Use. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. 2007. Hydric Soils of the United States. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Hydrologic Unit Map for Kendall County. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. 1987. Soil Erosion by Water. Agriculture Information Bulletin 513. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. 2008. Soil Survey of Kendall County. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/. Accessed February 2025. Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899, Section 10. Rockford Map Publishers, Inc. 2021. Land Atlas and Plat Book, Kendall County, Illinois, 21st Edition. United States Fish & Wildlife Service. 2018. National Wetlands Inventory. https://data.nal.usda.gov/dataset/national-wetlands-inventory. Accessed February 2025. Nature Conservancy (U.S.) Great Lakes Program. 1994. The Conservation of Biological Diversity in the Great Lakes Ecosystem: Issues and Opportunities. The Program, 1994. Attachment 11, Page 46 Noise Impact Considerations Perivoliotis CSG - Samuel’s Solar 2 LLC Version 1 February, 2025 Attachment 12, Page 1 2 Table of Contents Project overview 3 Site location and design 4 Project Design Overview 5 Noise terminology and thresholds 6 Definition Common Construction Noise Corona Noise Vibrations Federal Noise Regulations Illinois Noise Regulations Project Noise Impact 9 Phase I: Construction Phase II: Operation Phase III Decommissioning Conclusion of Noise Impacts 11 Sources 12 Attachment 12, Page 2 3 Project Overview Zepelak CSG is a community solar garden that will employ a fixed tilt solar array proposed in Kendall County, IL. The project will be developed on previously cropped and developed farm land. The total area will encompass approximately 20.1 acres. The project will consist of three phases which could potentially cause noise pollution: (1) a construction phase of approximately 6-12 months, (2) a project lifetime of approximately 30-35 years, and (3) a decommissioning phase of approximately 20-25 weeks. The following document is a preliminary analysis of potential noise caused by the three phases of this community solar project. The noise-causing equipment will be highlighted and analyzed for each phase of the project. *The following document was prepared by Enterprise Energy LLC, a community solar developer and not a professional acoustic consultant. Data and information for this analysis was acquired by a 47 page Noise Impact Analysis performed by AECOM Environmental for a 250MW solar project in a similar developed farm landscape in Imperial County, California (1). Attachment 12, Page 3 4 Site Location and Design Site Address: Zepelak Community Solar Garden, Samuel’s Solar 2 LLC 9318 Corneils Ave Yorkville, IL 60560 Site Developer: Enterprise Energy LLC Developer Contact: Dan Gorman Tel: Attachment 12, Page 4 5 Project Design For standard noise reduction practices, all construction and operating equipment during the project’s lifetime will be located at least 50’ from the parcel boundary. Decibel thresholds are measured at a distance of 50’ from the sound source. All diesel equipment should be operated with appropriate mufflers, and with engine doors closed. Whenever possible, electrical power should be used in place of generators, to reduce noise. Construction will occur only between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM Monday through Friday, 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturdays, and no operation of equipment on Sundays Any inverters located within 100’ of a residence will be shielded with some type of structural barrier to reduce noise to less than 10dBA continuous noise level. Facility components include: 1. PV modules and Single Axis Trackers 2. Inverters 3. Transformer 4. Switchgears Attachment 12, Page 5 6 Noise Terminology and Thresholds Noise is typically described as unwanted sound. Sound is mechanical energy transmitted as a wave through a fluid to a hearing organ. Sound is described by frequency and amplitude, that define pitch and loudness respectively. The audible frequency range for humans is 20Hz-20,000Hz. Noise effects on humans range from annoyance to hearing impairment, depending on the pitch and loudness, which is defined in decibels (dB). A-weighted noise levels are decibel measurements, but weighted similarly to the Richter scale, to reflect how the human ear perceives sound. The human ear perceives loudness depending on the frequency of the sound, which is different from the purely physical wave intensity. All noise levels in this report are therefore reported in A-weighted decibels (dBA). Typical Construction Noise Levels: Attachment 12, Page 6 7 Corona Noise Corona noise is emitted when the intensity of an electric field surrounding a conductor exceeds the rating of its insulator, causing a dissipation of energy that may result in audible noise. Irregularities or water on the surface of the insulator surface can make audible corona noise more likely. Audible noise from conductors is more likely during wet weather. See below for a table of noise levels for wet transmission lines (the “worst-case scenario”). Vibration and Vibration Noise Construction can also generate vibrations, defined as waves traveling through mass, such as soil. Vibrations from construction sources do not typically reach levels that could cause any structural damage to nearby residences or other structures. Damage could be possible depending on the construction activity, for structures within 25 feet of activity. Vibrations dissipate greatly due to dispersion and friction losses the further from the source of vibration, so keeping all residences at least 50 feet away from the project should eliminate any risk of vibration-borne damage. Vibrations can, however, cause annoyance to humans. See the table below for effects of vibration on people and structures Attachment 12, Page 7 8 In keeping construction activities at least 50’ from occupied residences, no vibrations that exceed annoyance levels will be experienced at neighboring properties. Federal Noise Regulations Federal noise regulations were developed following the recognition of noise impact on humans in the Noise Control Act of 1972. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration agency (OSHA) limits noise exposure for workers to 90dB Leq or less for 8 hours and 105 dB Leq for 1 hour. Appropriate noise PPE shall be worn by all workers. The EPA recommends that noise levels be limited to 55 dBA average over 24 hours, in order to protect human welfare. A 70 dBA average should not be exceeded in order to prevent hearing loss (2). Illinois Pollution Board Regulations The Illinois Noise Related Statutes and Regulations document (3) classifies our project as Industrial or Non-building Construction, corresponding to LBCS Function Code 7450. Using this LBCS code classifies our project as a Class C Land Use according to Illinois Pollution Control Board’s Environmental Protection Document: Subtitle H: Noise (4). The Environmental Protection Document: Subtitle H: Noise recommends daytime (6:00AM to 11:00PM) noise levels be limited to 58 dBA, except explosive noise which cannot exceed 107 dBA, when measured 25’ from neighboring property lines. As construction activities will always be at a minimum 200’ from neighboring residences, these limits are not likely to be exceeded. However, when construction begins, sound testing may be done at neighboring parcel lines to confirm levels are in compliance with both the EPA and the Illinois Noise Regulations. Attachment 12, Page 8 9 Noise Impact: Phase I: Construction Activities Approximately 6-12 months Initial development would begin with grading and building of the access road, followed by the establishment of temporary laydown areas, as designated by the final site plan. On this laydown area, equipment may include, but is not limited to: construction trailer, temporary restroom, parking area, material receiving and storage, recycling and waste area, construction power sources. Daily road usage activities include, but are not limited to: delivery of construction equipment, project materials, and worker trips. Number of vehicles and workers expected could vary throughout the construction period. Construction of the array may include, but is not limited to: grading, compacting, excavating. Equipment used for such activities may include, but is not limited to: backhoes, bulldozers, pile drivers, excavation equipment, as well as hand tools. Equipment likely to generate the most noise (as seen in Table 4), are earth moving and pile-driving equipment, which generate approximately 85 dBA at 50 feet. This maximum noise level would last between 2-4 minutes at a time. Average noise levels during array construction would be around 75 dBA at 50 feet. However, as our project is unlikely to require much, if any grading (other than for the 1250 foot access road), maximum and average noise levels during construction time would likely be lower than these “worts-case scenario” levels. Equipment usage and construction activities will be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Monday through Friday, 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturdays, and no operation of equipment on Sundays Phase II: Operation Approximately 30-35 years Operational activities would generate low levels of noise, and be limited to daylight hours (when PV arrays operate), which is when other ambient noise is generally highest. Daily noise would come from operation of the inverter when electricity is being produced, the transformer, the small motors for the trackers, and potentially the corona noise from the feeder lines. Inverter: The Solectria 250kW inverter is rated at 67 dBA at 10 feet, as per the manufacturer’s data spec sheet. Using sound attenuation inverse square law, noise levels at 50 feet would therefore be approximately 53 dBA. This is the maximum noise output of the inverter at 50 feet, so noise levels for residences more than 100 feet away would be considerably less. Furthermore, the maximum noise levels would only occur during daylight hours, so the 24-hour average noise level would be much less, and far below regulatory requirements. Attachment 12, Page 9 10 Transformer: The exact model of transformer used for this project will be determined by the Utility that is responsible for our interconnection. However, average decibel levels for medium voltage transformers between 2001-2500 kVa, appropriate for our project size, are 62 dBA. This level is at 50 feet, and our transformers will be 100+ feet from any residence. Single Axis Trackers: These small motors are what use power to slowly rotate the modules throughout the day to maximize solar input. The trackers rotate from -52° to +52° throughout the day, rotating roughly 1° every 3.5 minutes. The motors are stored in housing compartments, which greatly reduce the noise levels such that they should not have any significant effect on the overall project noise impact. Another possible source of noise would be the friction between the linkages between the tracker rods and the modules. Again, this noise will be insignificant (5). Corona Noise: Feeder lines at this site are 12kV which is far below the minimum of 138kV listed in Table 5. As corona noise levels decrease with voltage, the noise emitted from the 12kV feeder line will likely be negligible. Phase III: Decommissioning Approximately 20-25 weeks Decommissioning will likely consist of activities including but not limited to excavation, ground work, pile-driving, and most other activities also associated with project construction. Therefore levels of noise would be similar to those of construction, and will be below regulatory thresholds. Decommissioning should last only approximately 20-25 weeks. Attachment 12, Page 10 11 Conclusion: As no phase of project lifetime (construction, operation, or decommissioning) is likely to exceed federal or local regulatory thresholds when performed at the setbacks as designed in the site plan, this project does not plan any further noise mitigation efforts. Attachment 12, Page 11 12 Sources 1. AECOM. (2014). Noise Impact Analysis: Wistaria Ranch Solar Energy Center Project, Imperial County, California. Prepared for Wistaria Ranch Solar, LLC. Retrieved from https://www.icpds.com/assets/planning/final-environmental-impact-reports/wistaria-ranch-solar-en ergy-center/019appf-noise.pdf. 2. US EPA, OA. “EPA Identifies Noise Levels Affecting Health and Welfare.” Www.epa.gov, 2 Apr. 1974, www.epa.gov/archive/epa/aboutepa/epa-identifies-noise-levels-affecting-health-and-welfare.html. 3. Illinois Noise Related Statutes and Regulations. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://noisefree.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/illinois.pdf. 4. Illinois Pollution Control Board, Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subtitle H: Noise, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Part 901: Sound Emission Standards and Limitations for Property Line-Noise-Sources, effective November 1, 2018. 5. Hankard Environmental, Inc. (2019). 1 Noise Measurement and Analysis Results for the Luning Solar Energy Center. 2 Public Service Commission of Wisconsin. 3 PSC REF#:384115. Retrieved from [link to document if available]. 6. https://www.makeitelectric.org/nema-standards-technologies/nema-standards/ Attachment 12, Page 12 Attachment 13, Page 1 Attachment 13, Page 2 Attachment 13, Page 3 Attachment 13, Page 4 Attachment 13, Page 5 Attachment 13, Page 6 Attachment 13, Page 7 Attachment 13, Page 8 Attachment 13, Page 9 Attachment 13, Page 10 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Purchasing Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #10 Tracking Number EDC 2025-45 Bristol Ridge Solar Farm 105 – License Agreement Economic Development Committee – June 3, 2025 Majority Approval Proposed License Agreement for City access to future Bristol Ridge Solar Farm. Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department SUMMARY: Turning Point Energy, LLC, dba TPE IL KE105, LLC, a solar energy developer planning to construct a solar project on approximately 26 acres of land located north of the BNSF railroad and east of Cannonball Trail (see below), is requesting the City enter into a License Agreement allowing the City legal access to the subject property in the event the developer fails to carry out their decommissioning obligations. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Sara Mendez, Senior Planner David Hansen, Senior Planner Date: May 29, 2025 Subject: Bristol Ridge Solar Farm 105- TPE IL KE105, LLC License Agreement for Decommissioning BACKGROUND: In 2023, the City approved a special use permit, rezoning, variance, and an amendment to the annexation agreement for the southern portion of the existing Bristol Ridge Development. This area, originally intended for residential housing, was approved for the development of an approximately 26-acre solar farm, as detailed in the following site plan: As a condition of the special use approval, the petitioner agreed to provide a decommissioning plan and financial security in the form of a bond to cover the costs associated with removing the solar farm system, restoring the property, and reimbursing the City for any legal expenses incurred if the developer fails to maintain or properly decommission the facility. The petitioner has acknowledged these obligations and submitted a decommissioning plan with an estimated bonding value of $750,030. Additionally, the petitioner was advised at that time that an easement over the entire property must be granted to allow City staff access to the site should removal of the solar farm by the City become necessary. As the project advances toward construction, the petitioner is now requesting that the City, in lieu of a blanket easement, enter into a License Agreement for access to the solar farm. While both a license agreement and an easement are legal tools used to grant access to property, they differ in terms of flexibility, permanence, and scope. A License Agreement typically applies for a defined period and is revocable under specified conditions. It also restricts who may access the property and for what purposes, and it is non- transferable. In contrast, an easement constitutes a real property interest, is recorded against the property, and binds future owners. The petitioner feels the License Agreement avoids creating a permanent encumbrance on the property title and is better suited for providing the restricted access needed by the City for the project. STAFF COMMENTS: Due to the limited scope and need of the City’s access to the subject property in the event the developer fails to decommission the solar farm, staff is supportive of the proposed License Agreement. This request is tentatively scheduled for a vote at the June 10th City Council meeting. Staff and the petitioner are seeking comments from the Economic Development Committee about the proposed draft agreement prepared by the City Attorney and attached for your review. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Draft Ordinance 2) Draft License Agreement Ordinance No. 2025-____ Page 1 Ordinance No. 2025-_____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS APPROVING A LICENSE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AND TPE IL KE105, LLC WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”) is a duly organized and validly existing non-home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and WHEREAS, TPE IL KE105, LLC (the “Developer”) an Illinois limited liability company, is a developer of solar energy and storage projects which intends to develop a new solar energy project (the “Project”) on approximately twenty-six (26) acres in the City located north of the BNSF railroad line and east of Cannonball trail (the “Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the zoning code of the City requires a special use permit to operate the Project which was granted to the Developer for the Project on the condition that the Developer enter into a decommissioning plan (the “Decommissioning Plan”) providing for a removal of all equipment and other properties related to the Project upon termination of its operation; and WHEREAS, the Developer has provided the City with a Decommissioning Plan and is now prepared to enter into a License Agreement in the form attached hereto granting the City access to the Subject Property in the event the Developer fails to decommission the Project in accordance with the Decommissioning Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. The foregoing preambles are hereby incorporated into this Ordinance as if fully restated herein. Section 2. That the License Agreement by and between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois and TPE IL KE105, LLC is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to execute. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record this License Agreement with the County Clerk of Kendall Couty. Ordinance No. 2025-____ Page 2 Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, publication, and approval as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this ____ day of __________________, A.D. 2025. ______________________________ CITY CLERK KEN KOCH _________ DAN TRANSIER _________ ARDEN JOE PLOCHER _________ CRAIG SOLING _________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER _________ MATT MAREK _________ RUSTY CORNEILS _________ RUSTY HYETT _________ APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this ____ day of __________________, A.D. 2025. ______________________________ MAYOR Attest: ______________________________ CITY CLERK 1 License Agreement This License Agreement is entered into this _____ day of _________, 2025 by and between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”) and TPE IL KE105, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Developer”). Preambles WHEREAS, the City is a non-home rule municipality of the State of Illinois created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of this State; and WHEREAS, Developer is a developer of solar energy and storage projects which has entered into a lease of approximately 54 acres, located north of the BNSF railroad line and east of Cannonball Trail, legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Subject Property”), to install a freestanding solar energy project (the “Project”) on 26 acres thereof; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Code of the City requires a special use permit to operate a solar energy project, and a special use permit was granted to Developer by the City for the Project, subject to certain conditions, including providing the City with a decommissioning plan, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B (the “Decommissioning Plan”), and a decommissioning security guarantee of $750,030 (the “Decommissioning Surety”); and, WHEREAS, Developer has further agreed to enter into this Agreement granting the City access to the Subject Property in the event Developer fails to decommission the Project in accordance with the Decommissioning Plan all as hereinafter provided. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual understanding between the City and Developer, the issuance of a special use permit by the City for the Project and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: Section 1. The foregoing preambles are hereby adopted as if fully restated in this Section 1. Section 2. Developer hereby agrees to provide the City with prior notice of its decision to terminate its operation of the Project at the Subject Property (the “Operations Termination Notice”). If Developer fails to provide the City with the Operations Termination Notice, the City may rely on notice from the owner of the Subject Property (the “Lessor”) or any reliable source that Developer has ceased its operation of the Project. Section 3. Upon receipt of the Operations Termination Notice, Developer hereby grants the City a license to enter upon the Subject Property to ensure that Developer is proceeding with the decommissioning of the Project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Decommissioning Plan. Developer agrees to complete the decommissioning of the Project within twelve (12) months from the date of the Operations Termination Notice. In the event the decommissioning is not being performed in accordance with the Decommissioning Plan, meaning the Project has not been removed within twelve (12) months of the Operations Termination Notice, the City is hereby authorized to proceed to decommission the Project, with all costs of such decommissioning to be paid from the Decommissioning Surety. 2 Section 4. Any notice, request, demand or communication as required by this Agreement shall be deemed to have been duly given if in writing and sent by regular mail, overnight or express delivery or personally delivered to: To the City: United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Attn: City Administrator To Developer: TPE IL KE105, LLC c/o TPE Development, LLC 7272 E. Indian School Rd, Suite 540 Scottsdale, AZ 85251 Attn: Adam Beal, EVP of Development Section 5. This License Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a term commencing with its execution and terminating with the completion of the decommissioning of the Project in accordance with the Decommissioning Plan. Section 5.1. Upon successful completion of decommissioning, a release of the Decommissioning Surety shall immediately be executed by the City. Section 6. This License Agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder of Kendall County. Section 6.1. Upon successful completion of decommissioning, a release of this License Agreement shall immediately be executed by the City and recorded with the Recorder of Kendall County. Section 7. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Illinois and any legal action taken by either the City or Developer shall be before the Circuit Court of Kendall County, Illinois. Section 8. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of the Project and be binding upon the successors and assigns of either party. Section 9. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which is deemed to be an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunder set their hands as of the date first written above. United City of Yorkville By: _________________________________ TPE IL KE105, LLC By: _________________________________ 3 STATE OF ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ) I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that _______________________, of TPE IL KE105, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, who is personally known to me to be the____________________, of said company, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged that he/she signed and delivered the foregoing Agreement as his/her own free and voluntary act and as the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the purposes therein set forth. Given under my hand and official seal this ____ day of ________________, 202__. _______________________________________ Notary Public 4 STATE OF ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ) I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that _______________________, of the United City of Yorkville, an Illinois non-home rule municipal corporation, who is personally known to me to be the____________________, of said municipal corporation, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged that he/she signed and delivered the foregoing Agreement as his/her own free and voluntary act and as the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the purposes therein set forth. Given under my hand and official seal this ____ day of ________________, 202__. Notary Public 1 EXHIBIT A THAT PART OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL LYING EASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF CANNONBALL TRAIL: A PART OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE PUBLIC HIGHWAY LEADING NORTH FROM HUNTSVILLE, IN SAID DIRECTION AT A POINT WHERE THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID HIGHWAY INTERSECTS THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF ELIZABETH RIDER'S LAND; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID ELIZABETH RIDER'S LAND 315 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF, THENCE NORTH AT RIGHT ANGLES WITH SAID FIRST LINE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID RIDER LAND, TO THE CENTER OF SAID BRISTOL ROAD; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE CENTER OF SAID HIGHWAY, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LAND BELONGING TO HARRY C. ECCLES; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID ECCLES LAND, TO A POINT IN SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 60 CHAINS FROM THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE EAST, ALONG THE SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID HARRY C. ECCLES LAND TO THE 8TH SECTION LINE, AND BEING THE WEST LINE OF N.C. RIDER'S LAND; THENCE SOUTH, ON SAID 8TH SECTION LINE AND RIDER'S WEST LINE TO THE RIGHT OF WAY OF C.B. AND Q. RR CO.; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID RAILROAD CO. TO WHERE THE SAME IS INTERSECTED BY THE NORTHERLY LINE OF JAMES KENNEDY'S LAND; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID KENNEDY'S LAND, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID JAMES KENNEDY'S LAND; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE HIGHWAY TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING, INCLUDING THE EAST HALF MILE OF HIGHWAY WESTERLY AND BORDERING SAID PREMISES; EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE PREMISES TWO LOTS 4 BY 8 RODS EACH IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PREMISES, HERETOFORE DEEDED TO JOSEPH KENNEDY AND JAMES KENNEDY, SITUATED IN THE TOWN OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL ESTATE HERETOFORE CONVEYED TO COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY BE DEED RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 73-1974, TO THAT PART OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 15 AND THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN (FORMERLY CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY) RAILROAD; THENCE SOUTH 74 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD, A DISTANCE OF 2910.45 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF "REEVES" LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED MARCH 13, 1952, AS DOCUMENT #101936; THENCE NORTH 3 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID "REEVES" LAND A DISTANCE OF 12.80 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE "REEVES" LAND, A DISTANCE 340.18 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID LINE WITH A LINE 2 DRAWN 150 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO, AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHERLY TIGHT OF WAY OF SAID RAILROAD; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 331.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 15 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST ALONG A LINE OF SAID RAILROAD, A DISTANCE OF 2941.14 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 197.57 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF CANNONBALL TRAIL (BEING THE CENTER LINE OF STATE ROUTS 10, SECTION 19-15D) AND A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 80.0 FEET, NORMALLY DISTANT, SOUTHERLY OF "ELIZABETH RIDER'S LAND", THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 239.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 354.96 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO JAMES KENNEDY BY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED ON APRIL 21, 1982, IN BOOK 48 OF DEEDS, PAGE 480; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 106.70 FEET TO THE EAST LINE, AS OCCUPIED AND MONUMENTED, OF LANDS CONVEYED TO GEORGE MEWHIRTER BY A WARRANTY DEED RECORDED MAY 1, 1899, IN BOOK 55 OF DEEDS, PAGE 25; THENCE NORTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, BEING ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND SAID EAST LINE EXTENDED 132.0 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 190.33 FEET TO SAID CENTER LINE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 1 EXHIBIT B 2 3 4