Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Economic Development Packet 2026 06-02-26
AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, June 2, 2026 6:00 p.m. East Conference Room #337 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Yorkville, IL Citizen Comments: Minutes for Correction/Approval: May 5, 2026 New Business: 1. EDC 2026-26 Building Permit Report for April 2026 2. EDC 2026-27 Building Inspection Report for April 2026 3. EDC 2026-28 Property Maintenance Report for April 2026 4. EDC 2026-29 Economic Development Report for May 2026 5. EDC 2026-30 C1 Yorkville – CHI-11 (Cyrus One) – PUD Amendment and Preliminary PUD Plan 6. EDC 2026-31 Project Cardinal – Annexation Agreement Amendment and Memorandum of Understanding Approval Old Business: Additional Business: United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 www.yorkville.il.us UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, June 2, 2026 6:00 PM EAST CONFERENCE ROOM #337 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. May 5, 2026 □ Approved __________ □ As presented □ With corrections --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2026-26 Building Permit Report for April 2026 □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. EDC 2026-27 Building Inspection Report for April 2026 □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. EDC 2026-28 Property Maintenance Report for April 2026 □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. EDC 2026-29 Economic Development Report for May 2026 □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. EDC 2026-30 C1 Yorkville – CHI-11 (Cyrus One) – PUD Amendment and Preliminary PUD Plan □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. EDC 2026-31 Project Cardinal – Annexation Agreement Amendment and Memorandum of Understanding Approval □ Moved forward to CC __________ □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Economic Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Minutes Tracking Number Minutes of the Economic Development Committee – May 5, 2026 Economic Development Committee – June 2, 2026 Majority Committee Approval Minute Taker Name Department DRAFT Page 1 of 3 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 5, 2026, 6:00pm East Conference Room #337 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Yorkville, IL In Attendance: Committee Members Chairman Ken Koch Alderman Joe Plocher Alderman Rusty Hyett Alderman Matt Marek via Zoom Other City Officials Community Development Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble Code Official Pete Ratos City Attorney Megan Lamb Senior Planner Sara Mendez Senior Planner David Hansen Planner 1 Thian Dim Community Engagement & Marketing Coordinator Katelyn Gregory Economic Development Director Lynn Dubajic Kellogg Other Guests Ed Williams, The Williams Group Mike Williams, The Williams Group Tom Scofield, Ross Lane Development Lorinda Anderson Kristi Schuerman, Fox Hill Debbie DeParis, Red Gate Henry DeParis, Red Gate Neal Clay, Bristol Bay Leesa Poss, White Oak Estates Mark Martin, White Oak Estates Chuck Kasper, Legacy Estates Debbie Hernandez, Kylyn's Ridge Ann Simmons, Kennedy Road Scott Wade, Eldamain Rd. Kevin Graham Adam Scuro Robert Carvelli Sandra Carvelli, Pavillion Heights Via Zoom: Jeffrey Wolgast, John, Kara McNamara, Jack Schlueter, Chloe Russell The meeting was called to order at 6:00pm by Chairman Ken Koch. He asked to move items #6 and #7 forward under New Business. Citizen Comments Mr. Jack Schlueter voiced his opposition to the changes to the Comp Plan to accommodate the data centers. Attorney Megan Lamb clarified the procedure for voicing a public comment. Ms. Debbie Hernandez, 2121 Iroquois Lane in Kylyn's Ridge said she opposed the amendment for the rezoning from Estate/Conservation/Residential zoning to manufacturing. Chuck Kasper, Equestrian Estates, said he has property at 17P Ashe Road, 112 feet from the Cardinal property. He said both sites were designated as Estate/Conservation/Residential at the time rezoning was approved and this amendment is needed because the approvals were inconsistent with the existing Comp Plan. In his opinion, amending the Comp Plan after the fact, Page 2 of 3 does not address the concerns of the community. He will attend the June 10th PZC Public Hearing to express his opposition. Lorinda Anderson is a member of Preserve Our Yorkville and Community, LLC and her property is at 42 W. Starr Lane, about 500 feet from the border of the property in question. She respectfully noted her opposition to the Comp Plan amendment regarding Projects Cardinal and Steel. She said the staff memo confirms both sites were designated as Estate/Conservation/ Residential when the zoning was approved and that the amendment is needed because those approvals were inconsistent with the existing Comp Plan. In her opinion, amending the Comp Plan after the fact does not address the community concerns. She will be attending the Public Hearing on June 10 to oppose the amendments. Minutes for Correction/Approval March 3, 2026 The minutes were approved as presented. New Business (out of sequence) 6. EDC 2026-24 Grande Reserve Units 10B & 11B – Final Plat Thian Dim presented the information for this development and said the final plat application was received for units 10B and 11B. It is the final phase of development for these units. She said there will be a total of 312 units. She noted the original Annexation Agreement was approved in 2003 and the HOA will be required to pay for and perform all snowplowing for cul-de-sacs, of which there are 2 in unit 11. The setbacks meet the minimum requirements and they will be verified when they apply for building permits. She also gave a description of the appearance of the townhome buildings. The next step is to appear before the Planning and Zoning meeting on June 10 and at the City Council meeting on June 23 for a final vote. At this time, Attorney Lamb noted that 3 Aldermen were present at the meeting and Alderman Marek was attending via Zoom. Since he was attending via Zoom for a valid reason, she asked the attending Alderman for approval for Mr. Marek to participate via Zoom, to which they gave their consent. (out of sequence) 7. EDC 2026-25 Resolution to Induce the Redevelopment of Certain Properties within the Yorkville Downtown Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area (123 E. Hydraulic Street) Ms. Dubajic Kellogg said this is the third major project for the Williams Group in the downtown area. The property at 123 E. Hydraulic is also known as the Greiter building. She said this is a simple inducement resolution that allows them to discuss the redevelopment. She said the building needs significant improvement and without the resolution, nothing can move forward. The building is in TIF District #1 in the downtown area. Mr. Ed Williams said they like to keep the character of the downtown and to rebuild and repurpose. Alderman Koch asked if they would allow space along the river for a walkway, similar to their other projects. He asked if both sides of the river could someday be connected. It was noted this would involve significant funding. This item will move forward to the City Council next week. (return to regular agenda order) 1. EDC 2026-19 Building Permit Reports for February and March 2026 Mr. Ratos reported 39 permits, 6 single family attached and 2 commercial in February. In March, there were 81 permits, 11 single family detached and 9 single family attached along with 10 commercial. Page 3 of 3 2. EDC 2026-20 Building Inspection Reports for February and March 2026 Mr. Ratos reported 366 inspections in February and 467 in March. Most were single family attached or detached homes, many of them in Grande Reserve. 3. EDC 2026-21 Property Maintenance Reports for February and March 2026 In February, 3 cases were heard with 1 dismissed and 2 pending. Seventeen cases were heard in March, all for Bristol Bay townhomes. Work on these buildings had stopped and started and windows had been broken and trash was present. Fines are in excess of $100,000 at this time. Most items have now come into compliance. 4. EDC 2026-22 Economic Development Reports for March and April 2026 Ms. Kellogg referred the committee to the report in the agenda packet and she added more business is being worked on, but there are no formal applications at this time. 5. EDC 2026-23 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Text Amendment David Hansen said each year the city reviews past rezoning approvals with the Comp Plan to insure they are consistent with the future land use map. He said the Comp Plan is a guide, but is also intended to be amended. He said in 2025/2026 the City Council approved 6 developments that required rezoning and he briefly listed them. He said the next step is to move them forward to Public Hearing at Planning and Zoning and then to City Council on June 23 for a vote. Alderman Marek clarified that the amendments do not affect the rest of the Plan, but just eliminate any confusion. There are no recommendations to change any other areas. Ms. Noble said state law requires the city to update the Plan as developments occur. In response to a meeting participant, Ms. Noble clarified the city's Comp Plan actions. She said it is a 10-year plan and was last updated in 2016. She said this is a guiding document and does not affect zoning. It is the city's idea of the future land use. In 2016 a comprehensive study was done which focused on certain areas, especially unfinished subdivisions and holding spaces were left for land uses in Estate and Agricultural where the city did not see those areas developing within a 10-year horizon. The yearly updates reflect what has been approved by City Council so that it is current in land use adaptations. It will be updated again in 26/27. Old Business: None Additional Business: None There was no further business and the meeting adjourned at 6:24pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Economic Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #1 Tracking Number EDC 2026-26 Building Permit Report for April 2026 Economic Development Committee – June 2, 2026 Informational None All permits issued in April 2026. Gina Nelson Community Development Name Department UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUILDING PERMIT REPORT April 2026 TYPES OF PERMITS Number of Permits Issued SFD Single Family Detached SFA Single Family Attached Multi- Family Apartments Condominiums Commercial Includes all Permits Issued for Commercial Use Industrial Misc. Construction Cost Permit Fees April 2026 140 9 6 0 10 0 115 3,872,201.00 193,105.21 Calendar Year 2026 308 32 26 0 28 0 222 15,885,507.00 660,345.67 Fiscal Year 2026 1348 119 146 0 131 0 952 107,377,532.00 2,821,843.92 April 2025 153 10 9 0 12 0 122 54,790,514.00 224,939.78 Calendar Year 2025 361 34 36 0 54 0 237 75,425,158.00 784,749.39 Fiscal Year 2025 1381 143 42 1 permit 48 units 152 0 1,043 122,751,287.00 2,828,909.15 April 2024 177 31 0 0 4 0 142 7,633,526.00 340,566.32 Calendar Year 2024 447 96 0 0 32 0 319 94,028,537.00 1,220,420.13 Fiscal Year 2024 2270 276 109 0 92 0 1793 176,438,593.00 5,692,367.09 April 2023 138 10 4 0 9 0 115 3,579,884.00 169,823.34 Calendar Year 2023 447 88 38 0 32 0 287 24,408,904.00 1,161,115.33 Fiscal Year 2023 1552 198 141 0 111 0 1102 72,256,600.00 3,467,857.51 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Economic Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #2 Tracking Number EDC 2026-27 Building Inspection Report for April 2026 Economic Development Committee – June 2, 2026 Informational None All inspections scheduled in April 2026. Gina Nelson Community Development Name Department DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PR 23:00 AM 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20241311 353 PENSACOLA ST 1145 04/24/2026 PR 23:00 AM 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/24/2026 Comments1: ERIC 630-234-1820 PR 23:00 AM 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/24/2026 PR 23:00 AM 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/24/2026 BF _____ 019-REI REINSPECTION 20241459 1205 GILLESPIE LN 402 04/01/2026 Comments1: MECHANICAL --- PLEASE CALL 630-365-7229 Comments2: BEFORE ARRIVAL -- JENN@ABBYPROPERTIES.LL Comments3: C BF _____ 020-REI REINSPECTION 04/01/2026 Comments1: BUILDING --- PLEASE CALL 630-365-7229 BE Comments2: FORE ARRIVAL -- JENN@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC PR _____ 049-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20250232 306 BOOMBAH BLVD 0 04/07/2026 Comments1: BRING BUILDING PR _____ 050-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/07/2026 Comments1: BRINE BUILDING PR 23:00 AM 051-INS INSULATION 04/17/2026 Comments1: BRINE BUILDING PR 23:00 AM 052-ABC ABOVE CEILING 04/17/2026 Comments1: TRAINING ROOM - LOCKER AREA PR 23:00 AM 053-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/17/2026 Comments1: SALT DOME RA 23:00 AM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20250495 7144 ROUTE 47 0 04/01/2026 Comments1: EARLY AM RA 23:00 AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250587 494 SHADOW WOOD DR 102 04/06/2026 Comments1: ION RA 23:00 AM 026-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20250588 545 W BARBERRY CIR 44 04/20/2026 Comments1: BRANDON RA 23:00 AM 027-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/20/2026 Comments1: BRANDON RA _____ 028-EPW PUBLIC WALK 04/22/2026 Comments1: PARTIAL DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------RA _____ 029-EDA DRIVEWAY, APRON 04/22/2026 BF 23:00 AM 021-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250638 3993 SHOEGER DR 40 04/10/2026 Comments1: FOR MODEL HOME USE JENN@ABBYPROPERTIE Comments2: S.LLC BF _____ 022-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/10/2026 Comments1: FOR MODEL HOME USE JENN@ABBYPROPERTIE Comments2: S.LLC BF _____ 023-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/10/2026 Comments1: FOR MODEL HOME USE JENN@ABBYPROPERTIE Comments2: S.LLC PBF _____ 024-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/10/2026 Comments1: FOR MODEL HOME USE JENN@ABBYPROPERTIE Comments2: S.LLC GS _____ 025-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 04/10/2026 Comments1: OK TO TEMP FOR MODEL USE BF _____ 026-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/14/2026 Comments1: REINSPECTION - FOR MODEL HOME USE JEN Comments2: N@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC BF _____ 027-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/14/2026 Comments1: REINSPECTION - FOR MODEL HOME USE JEN Comments2: N@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC BF _____ 028-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/14/2026 Comments1: REINSPECTION - FOR MODEL HOME USE JEN Comments2: N@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC BF _____ 022-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20250639 3995 SHOEGER DR 40 04/10/2026 Comments1: FOR MODEL HOME USE JENN@ABBYPROPERTIE Comments2: S.LLC BF _____ 023-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/10/2026 Comments1: FOR MODEL HOME USE JENN@ABBYPROPERTIE Comments2: S.LLC BF _____ 024-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/10/2026 Comments1: FOR MODEL HOME USE JENN@ABBYPROPERTIE Comments2: S.LLC PBF _____ 025-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/10/2026 Comments1: FOR MODEL HOME USE JENN@ABBYPROPERTIE Comments2: S.LLC DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GS _____ 026-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 04/10/2026 Comments1: CAN NOT TEMP FOR MODEL OCC BF _____ 027-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/14/2026 Comments1: REINSPECTION - FOR MODEL HOME USE JEN Comments2: N@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC BF _____ 028-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/14/2026 Comments1: REINSPECTION - FOR MODEL HOME USE JEN Comments2: N@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC BF _____ 029-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/14/2026 Comments1: REINSPECTION - FOR MODEL HOME USE JEN Comments2: N@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC GS _____ 030-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 04/15/2026 Comments1: OK TO TEMP RA 23:00 AM 011-WK SERVICE WALK 20250721 3998 SHOEGER DR 24 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 13:00 PM 012-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 011-WK SERVICE WALK 20250722 4006 SHOEGER DR 24 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 13:00 PM 012-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL BF 23:00 AM 010-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250725 2736 CROOKER DR 15 04/23/2026 Comments1: ABEL MARIN JR <abeljr@abbyproperties.llc Comments2: > PLEASE SEE INSPECTION SHEET FOR COMME Comments3: NTS FOR ROUGH BF 23:00 AM 010-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250726 2738 CROOKER DR 15 04/23/2026 Comments1: ABEL MARIN JR <abeljr@abbyproperties.llc Comments2: >PLEASE SEE INSPECTION SHEET FOR COMMENT Comments3: S FOR ROUGH BF 23:00 AM 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250727 2744 CROOKER DR 14 04/23/2026 Comments1: ABEL MARIN JR <abeljr@abbyproperties.llc Comments2: > PLEASE SEE INSPECTION SHEET FOR COMME Comments3: NTS FOR ROUGH BF 23:00 AM 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250728 2748 CROOKER DR 14 04/23/2026 Comments1: ABEL MARIN JR <abeljr@abbyproperties.llc Comments2: > PLEASE SEE INSPECTION SHEET FOR COMMEN Comments3: TS FOR ROUGH DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF _____ 011-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250729 2733 CROOKER DR 57 04/15/2026 Comments1: 1. PROVIDE ACCESS TO BASEMENT. 2. PROVID Comments2: E SERVICE OUTLET AT PANEL BOARD. 3. SECO Comments3: ND GROUND ROD AT METER NEEDS TO BE MIN 6 Comments4: ' FROM FIRST ROD BC 13:00 PM 012-REI REINSPECTION 04/17/2026 Comments1: ELEC SERVICE BF _____ 011-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250730 2735 CROOKER DR 57 04/15/2026 Comments1: 1. PROVIDE ACCESS TO BASEMENT. 2. PROVID Comments2: E SERVICE OUTLET AT PANEL BOARD. 3. SECO Comments3: ND GROUND ROD AT METER NEEDS TO BE MIN 6 Comments4: ' FROM FIRST ROD BC 13:00 PM 012-REI REINSPECTION 04/17/2026 Comments1: ELECTRICAL SERVICE BF _____ 010-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250731 2743 CROOKER DR 58 04/15/2026 Comments1: 1. PROVIDE ACCESS TO BASEMENT. 2. PROVID Comments2: E SERVICE OUTLET AT PANEL BOARD. 3. SECO Comments3: ND GROUND ROD AT METER NEEDS TO BE MIN 6 Comments4: ' FROM FIRST ROD BC 13:00 PM 011-REI REINSPECTION 04/17/2026 Comments1: ELEC SERVICE BF _____ 010-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250732 2745 CROOKER DR 58 04/15/2026 Comments1: 1. PROVIDE ACCESS TO BASEMENT. 2. PROVID Comments2: E SERVICE OUTLET AT PANEL BOARD. 3. SECO Comments3: ND GROUND ROD AT METER NEEDS TO BE MIN 6 Comments4: ' FROM FIRST ROD BC _____ 011-REI REINSPECTION 04/17/2026 Comments1: ELEC SERVICE BF 23:00 AM 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250775 2702 CROOKER DR 16 04/23/2026 Comments1: ABEL MARIN JR <abeljr@abbyproperties.llc Comments2: > PLEASE SEE INSPECTION SHEET FOR COMME Comments3: NTS FOR ROUGH BF 23:00 AM 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250776 2726 CROOKER DR 16 04/23/2026 Comments1: ABEL MARIN JR <abeljr@abbyproperties.llc Comments2: > PLEASE SEE INSPECTION SHEET FOR COMMEN Comments3: TS FOR ROUGH RA 23:00 AM 012-WK SERVICE WALK 20250783 4062 SHOEGER DR 20 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------RA 13:00 PM 013-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 012-WK SERVICE WALK 20250784 4068 SHOEGER DR 20 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 13:00 PM 013-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 011-WK SERVICE WALK 20250785 2643 CROOKER DR 50 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 011-WK SERVICE WALK 20250786 2645 CROOKER DR 50 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 025-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20250815 2600 HATCH CT 13 04/22/2026 Comments1: PARTIAL - MW GS _____ 026-ADA ADA ACCESSIBLE WALK WAY 04/22/2026 BF _____ 010-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250819 2693 CROOKER DR 55 04/15/2026 Comments1: 1. PROVIDE ACCESS TO BASEMENT. 2. PROVID Comments2: E SERVICE OUTLET AT PANEL BOARD. 3. SECO Comments3: ND GROUND ROD AT METER NEEDS TO BE MIN 6 Comments4: ' FROM FIRST ROD BC 13:00 PM 011-REI REINSPECTION 04/17/2026 Comments1: ELECTRIC SERVICE BC _____ PM 012-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/30/2026 Comments1: ABEL BF _____ 010-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250820 2695 CROOKER DR 55 04/15/2026 Comments1: 1. PROVIDE ACCESS TO BASEMENT. 2. PROVID Comments2: E SERVICE OUTLET AT PANEL BOARD. 3. SECO Comments3: ND GROUND ROD AT METER NEEDS TO BE MIN 6 Comments4: ' FROM FIRST ROD BC 13:00 PM 011-REI REINSPECTION 04/17/2026 Comments1: ELECTRIC SERVICE BC _____ PM 012-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/30/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 012-WK SERVICE WALK 20250821 4042 SHOEGER DR 22 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 012-WK SERVICE WALK 20250822 4048 SHOEGER DR 22 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------RA 23:00 AM 012-WK SERVICE WALK 20250823 4028 SHOEGER DR 23 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 012-WK SERVICE WALK 20250824 4036 SHOEGER DR 23 04/10/2026 BF _____ 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250825 2723 CROOKER DR 56 04/15/2026 Comments1: 1. PROVIDE ACCESS TO BASEMENT. 2. PROVID Comments2: E SERVICE OUTLET AT PANEL BOARD. 3. SECO Comments3: ND GROUND ROD AT METER NEEDS TO BE MIN 6 Comments4: ' FROM FIRST ROD BC 13:00 PM 010-REI REINSPECTION 04/17/2026 Comments1: ELEC SERVICE BC _____ PM 011-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/30/2026 Comments1: ABEL BF _____ 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250826 2725 CROOKER DR 56 04/15/2026 Comments1: 1. PROVIDE ACCESS TO BASEMENT. 2. PROVID Comments2: E SERVICE OUTLET AT PANEL BOARD. 3. SECO Comments3: ND GROUND ROD AT METER NEEDS TO BE MIN 6 Comments4: ' FROM FIRST ROD BC _____ 010-REI REINSPECTION 04/17/2026 Comments1: ELEC SERVICE BC _____ PM 011-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/30/2026 Comments1: ABEL PR 14:00 004-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20250831 651 W CORNEILS RD 0 04/06/2026 Comments1: CONCRETE PAD PR 14:00 005-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/07/2026 Comments1: CONCRETE PAD BF 23:00 AM 010-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250891 2686 CROOKER DR 17 04/23/2026 Comments1: ABEL MARIN JR <abeljr@abbyproperties.llc Comments2: > PLEASE SEE INSPECTION SHEET FOR COMMEN Comments3: TS FOR ROUGH BF 23:00 AM 011-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250892 2692 CROOKER DR 17 04/23/2026 Comments1: ABEL MARIN JR <abeljr@abbyproperties.llc Comments2: > PLEASE SEE INSPECTION SHEET FOR COMME Comments3: NTS FOR ROUGH BF _____ 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250893 2676 CROOKER DR 18 04/23/2026 Comments1: ABEL MARIN JR <abeljr@abbyproperties.llc Comments2: > PLEASE SEE INSPECTION SHEET FOR COMMEN Comments3: TS FOR ROUGH DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF 23:00 AM 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250894 2682 CROOKER DR 18 04/23/2026 Comments1: ABEL MARIN JR <abeljr@abbyproperties.llc Comments2: > PLEASE SEE INSPECTION SHEET FOR COMMEN Comments3: TS FOR ROUGH BF 23:00 AM 010-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250895 2668 CROOKER DR 19 04/23/2026 Comments1: PLEASE SEE INSPECTION SHEET FOR COMMENTS Comments2: FOR ROUGH BF 23:00 AM 010-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20250896 2672 CROOKER DR 19 04/23/2026 Comments1: ABEL MARIN JR <abeljr@abbyproperties.llc Comments2: > PLEASE SEE INSPECTION SHEET FOR COMMEN Comments3: TS FOR ROUGH RA _____ 011-WK SERVICE WALK 20250897 4052 SHOEGER DR 21 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 011-WK SERVICE WALK 20250898 4058 SHOEGER DR 21 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 019-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20250899 4001 SHOEGER DR 42 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 018-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20250900 4007 SHOEGER DR 42 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 018-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20250901 4021 SHOEGER DR 43 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 018-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20250902 4027 SHOEGER DR 43 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 019-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20250903 4031 SHOEGER DR 44 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 019-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20250904 4037 SHOEGER DR 44 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 019-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20250905 4041 SHOEGER DR 45 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 019-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20250906 4047 SHOEGER DR 45 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 019-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20250907 4051 SHOEGER DR 46 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 019-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20250908 4057 SHOEGER DR 46 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC 13:00 PM 012-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250909 4061 SHOEGER DR 47 04/02/2026 Comments1: ABELJR@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC BC 13:00 PM 013-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/02/2026 Comments1: ABELJR@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC BC 13:00 PM 014-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/02/2026 Comments1: ABELJR@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC PBF 13:00 PM 015-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/02/2026 Comments1: ABELJR@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC BC 23:00 AM 016-INS INSULATION 04/06/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 017-EPW PUBLIC WALK 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL BC 13:00 PM 012-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20250910 4067 SHOEGER DR 47 04/07/2026 Comments1: ABEL BC 13:00 PM 013-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/07/2026 BC 13:00 PM 014-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/07/2026 Comments1: ABEL PBF 13:00 PM 015-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/07/2026 Comments1: ABELJR@ABBYPROPERTIES.LLC BC 23:00 AM 016-INS INSULATION 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 017-EPW PUBLIC WALK 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 012-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20250911 4071 SHOEGER DR 48 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 012-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20250912 4077 SHOEGER DR 48 04/08/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 011-WK SERVICE WALK 20250913 2623 CROOKER DR 49 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL RA 23:00 AM 011-WK SERVICE WALK 20250914 2625 CROOKER DR 49 04/10/2026 Comments1: ABEL BC _____ 015-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20250941 2920 OLD GLORY DR 270 04/23/2026 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 002-REI REINSPECTION 20250981 937 STONY CREEK LN 62 04/10/2026 Comments1: FINAL DECK BC 23:00 AM 014-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20250989 1142 KATE DR 39 04/02/2026 Comments1: DRIVEWAY AND SERVICE WALKS - JOHN 630-54 Comments2: 6-8057 BC _____ 015-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/07/2026 Comments1: JOHN BC _____ 016-EPW PUBLIC WALK 04/07/2026 Comments1: JOHN BC _____ 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/28/2026 Comments1: CLAYTON BC _____ 018-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/28/2026 BC _____ 019-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/28/2026 PR _____ 020-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/28/2026 Comments1: CLAYTON GS _____ 021-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 04/29/2026 BC 23:00 AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251021 608 HEUSTIS ST 0 04/02/2026 Comments1: FURNACE PR 23:00 AM 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251030 3283 PINEWOOD DR 21 04/08/2026 Comments1: RUSS PR 23:00 AM 004-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/08/2026 Comments1: RUSS 630-863-4927 PR 23:00 AM 005-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/08/2026 Comments1: RUSS BC 13:00 PM 020-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20251117 511 BIRCHWOOD DR 132 04/07/2026 Comments1: JOHN BC 13:00 PM 021-STP STOOPS 04/07/2026 Comments1: BACK BC 13:00 PM 022-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/07/2026 PR 13:00 PM 023-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/10/2026 Comments1: MCCUE DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC 13:00 PM 024-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/10/2026 Comments1: MCCUE BC 13:00 PM 025-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/10/2026 BC 13:00 PM 026-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/10/2026 GS _____ 027-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 04/15/2026 Comments1: OK TO TEMP BF 13:00 PM 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251131 1704 JOHN ST 134 04/09/2026 Comments1: REINSPECTION SOLAR -- ADRIAN 312-459-647 Comments2: 2 BF 13:00 PM 004-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/09/2026 Comments1: REINSPECTION SOLAR - ADRIAN 312-459-6472 BC 23:00 AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20251136 2162 HENNING LN 337 04/22/2026 Comments1: paco - 630-536-4171 BF 23:00 AM 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251141 2269 EMERALD LN 50 04/24/2026 Comments1: SOLAR -- ADRIAN 312-459-6472 BF 23:00 AM 004-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/24/2026 PR 23:00 AM 023-WK SERVICE WALK 20251197 2672 ELDEN DR 270 04/06/2026 Comments1: MW - BATCH TICKETS RECEIVED RA 23:00 AM 016-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20251198 2682 ELDEN DR 271 04/06/2026 Comments1: MW BF 23:00 AM 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/13/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BF 23:00 AM 018-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/13/2026 BF 23:00 AM 019-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/13/2026 PBF 23:00 AM 020-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/13/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM GS _____ 021-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 04/13/2026 Comments1: OK TO TEMP RA 23:00 AM 017-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20251199 2692 ELDEN DR 272 04/06/2026 Comments1: MW BC 13:00 PM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251216 116 NADEN CT 69 04/14/2026 Comments1: GENERATOR -- CALL 30 MINUTES BEFORE ARRI Comments2: VAL 630-231-2848 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF 13:00 PM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251218 2904 GRANDE TR 91 04/15/2026 Comments1: ESS -- ADRIAN 312-459-6472 BF 13:00 PM 003-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/15/2026 BC _____ 016-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20251225 841 ALEXANDRA LN 21 04/07/2026 Comments1: JOHN BC 13:00 PM 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/22/2026 Comments1: CLAYTON BC 13:00 PM 018-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/22/2026 BC 13:00 PM 019-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/22/2026 PR 13:00 PM 020-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/22/2026 GS _____ 021-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 04/22/2026 Comments1: OK TO TEMP RA 23:00 AM 014-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20251231 2322 NOBLE LN 1071 04/17/2026 Comments1: RICK RA 23:00 AM 014-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20251232 2320 NOBLE LN 1072 04/17/2026 Comments1: RICK BF _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/27/2026 Comments1: RKPHILLIPS@DRHORTON.COM 224-340-5866 BF _____ 016-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/27/2026 Comments1: RKPHILLIPS@DRHORTON.COM 224-340-5866 BF _____ 017-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/27/2026 Comments1: RKPHILLIPS@DRHORTON.COM 224-340-5866 PBF _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/27/2026 Comments1: RKPHILLIPS@DRHORTON.COM 224-340-5866 PR _____ 019-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 04/27/2026 Comments1: TEMP (OK'D BY PR) RA 23:00 AM 014-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20251233 2318 NOBLE LN 1073 04/17/2026 Comments1: RICK RA 23:00 AM 014-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20251234 2316 NOBLE LN 1074 04/17/2026 Comments1: RICK RA 23:00 AM 015-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20251235 2314 NOBLE LN 1075 04/17/2026 Comments1: RICK DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC 13:00 PM 014-REI REINSPECTION 20251239 3537 RICHARDSON CIR 1044 04/01/2026 Comments1: ROUGH FRAME, ELECT, & MECH BC _____ 015-INS INSULATION 04/06/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BF 13:00 PM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251250 1186 HOMESTEAD DR 48 04/13/2026 Comments1: 1. provide proper wire management under Comments2: panels on roof. 2. provide second ground Comments3: rod or show that existing ground rod is Comments4: 25 OHMS or less. BF 13:00 PM 003-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/13/2026 Comments1: 1. provide proper wire management under Comments2: panels on roof. 2. provide second ground Comments3: rod or show that existing ground rod is Comments4: 25 OHMS or less. BF 23:00 AM 004-REI REINSPECTION 04/29/2026 Comments1: FINAL SOLAR -- CEASAR -- 773-808-4400 BF 23:00 AM 005-REI REINSPECTION 04/29/2026 RA 23:00 AM 023-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20251254 2672 BIG GROVE CIR 77 04/15/2026 Comments1: MW BF 13:00 PM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251281 1212 SPRING ST 193 04/06/2026 Comments1: SOLAR -- CEASAR 773-808-4400 BF 13:00 PM 003-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/06/2026 BF 13:00 PM 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251292 2712 ELDEN DR 274 04/20/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BF 13:00 PM 018-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/20/2026 Comments1: GFI outlet in Garage not working. BF 13:00 PM 019-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/20/2026 PBF 13:00 PM 020-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/20/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM GS _____ 021-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 04/20/2026 Comments1: OK TO TEMP BC 23:00 AM 022-REI REINSPECTION 04/21/2026 Comments1: FINAL ELECTRIC- DARREL DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------RA 23:00 AM 022-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20251296 2676 BIG GROVE CIR 79 04/27/2026 Comments1: MW RA 23:00 AM 022-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20251299 2674 BIG GROVE CIR 78 04/27/2026 Comments1: MW RA _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251306 109 CLAREMONT CT 32 04/17/2026 Comments1: ALINA 708-369-0444 BF _____ AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251322 552 TIMBER OAK LANE 0 04/16/2026 Comments1: SOLAR -- LARRY 435-962-0536 BF _____ AM 002-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/16/2026 PR 23:00 AM 018-ADA ADA ACCESSIBLE WALK WAY 20251329 902 HAYDEN DR 57 04/07/2026 Comments1: REMY PR 23:00 AM 019-EPW PUBLIC WALK 04/07/2026 BF _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251348 2613 HATCH CT 23 04/01/2026 Comments1: REPORT ISSUE BF _____ 016-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/01/2026 Comments1: REPORT ISSUE BF _____ 017-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/01/2026 Comments1: REPORT ISSUE PBF _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/01/2026 Comments1: KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM PR _____ 019-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/02/2026 PR _____ 020-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/02/2026 PR _____ 021-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/02/2026 GS _____ 022-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 04/01/2026 Comments1: OKAY TO TEMP BF _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251360 2680 BIG GROVE CIR 81 04/06/2026 Comments1: 1. REAR DECK STAIRS CANNOT HAVE OPEN RIS Comments2: ERS. 2. GRABBABLE HAND RAILING AT REAR D Comments3: ECK NEEDS TO BE RETURNED INTO 4X4, NO OP Comments4: EN END RAILINGS. BF _____ 016-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/06/2026 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF _____ 017-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/06/2026 PBF _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/06/2026 Comments1: KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM BC _____ 019-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/08/2026 Comments1: REAR COVERED PORCH STAIRS -- KALIN BC 23:00 AM 003-BKF BACKFILL 20251361 2668 BIG GROVE CIR 75 04/07/2026 Comments1: MW PR _____ 004-WAT WATER 04/09/2026 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM BC 23:00 AM 005-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/14/2026 Comments1: KALIN PR _____ 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/14/2026 Comments1: KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM BC 23:00 AM 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/20/2026 Comments1: MW BC _____ 001-FTG FOOTING 20251362 2622 SUTHERLAND CT 30 04/09/2026 BC 23:00 AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/13/2026 Comments1: MW BC 13:00 PM 003-BKF BACKFILL 04/17/2026 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 004-WAT WATER 04/20/2026 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM PBF _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/23/2026 Comments1: KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM BC _____ AM 006-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/30/2026 Comments1: MW BC _____ AM 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/30/2026 Comments1: MW BC 23:00 AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251375 1075 HAMPTON LN 226 04/28/2026 Comments1: BARBARA 815-228-9871 BC 23:00 AM 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20251383 4472 E MILLBROOK CIR 238 04/13/2026 Comments1: MW DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC 23:00 AM 009-STP STOOPS 04/13/2026 Comments1: FRONT BC _____ 010-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/15/2026 Comments1: KALIN BC _____ 011-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/15/2026 BC _____ 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/15/2026 PBF _____ 013-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/15/2026 Comments1: KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM BC _____ 014-INS INSULATION 04/17/2026 Comments1: KALIN BC 23:00 AM 015-STP STOOPS 04/23/2026 Comments1: FRONT & REAR MW PR _____ 010-INS INSULATION 20251390 8721 RT 126 0 04/14/2026 Comments1: TAMARA BC _____ 007-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20251401 3541 RICHARDSON CIR 1051 04/23/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 008-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/23/2026 BC _____ 009-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/23/2026 PBF _____ 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/23/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 011-INS INSULATION 04/27/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 007-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20251402 3543 RICHARDSON CIR 1052 04/27/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 008-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/27/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 009-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/27/2026 PBF _____ 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/27/2026 Comments1: CHRIS: 224-358-1606; CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON Comments2: .COM BC _____ 011-INS INSULATION 04/27/2026 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20251405 3167 GRANDE TR 1041 04/01/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/01/2026 BC _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/01/2026 PBF _____ 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/01/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 012-INS INSULATION 04/06/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 013-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/14/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 014-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/14/2026 BC _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20251406 3169 GRANDE TR 1042 04/06/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/06/2026 BC _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/06/2026 PBF _____ 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/06/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 012-INS INSULATION 04/08/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 013-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/14/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 014-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/14/2026 BF _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20251407 3171 GRANDE TR 1043 04/09/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BF _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/09/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BF _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/09/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PR _____ 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/09/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 012-INS INSULATION 04/13/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ AM 013-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/17/2026 Comments1: RICK BC _____ 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20251408 3173 GRANDE TR 1044 04/14/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/15/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/15/2026 BC _____ 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/15/2026 PBF _____ 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/15/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 013-INS INSULATION 04/17/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20251409 3175 GRANDE TR 1045 04/14/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC 13:00 PM 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/20/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC 13:00 PM 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/20/2026 BC 13:00 PM 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/20/2026 PBF 13:00 PM 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/20/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 013-INS INSULATION 04/23/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BF _____ 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20251412 2682 BIG GROVE CIR 82 04/08/2026 Comments1: KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM 630-927-2807 BF _____ 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/08/2026 BF _____ 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/08/2026 PBF _____ 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/08/2026 Comments1: KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM 630-927-2807 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF _____ 012-INS INSULATION 04/10/2026 Comments1: KALIN BC _____ 013-REI REINSPECTION 04/09/2026 Comments1: GAS PIPE IN BASEMENT BC 23:00 AM 014-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/13/2026 Comments1: MW BC 23:00 AM 015-STP STOOPS 04/13/2026 Comments1: FRONT - STOOP NOT STARTED BC 23:00 AM 016-STP STOOPS 04/23/2026 Comments1: FRONT - MW RA 23:00 AM 017-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 04/27/2026 Comments1: MW -- PUB WALK-GOOD , SERV WALK NOT READ Comments2: Y AND BROKEN CONCRETE SQUARE AT 2684 RA 23:00 AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251421 1931 BANBURY AVE 22 04/02/2026 Comments1: SAMANTHA 312-868-0660 PR 23:00 AM 006-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251441 3388 JONATHAN DR 157 04/01/2026 Comments1: JIM 224-324-0813 PR 23:00 AM 007-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/01/2026 PR 23:00 AM 008-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/01/2026 PR 23:00 AM 009-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/01/2026 RA 12:00 002-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20251446 402 WINDETT RIDGE RD 194 04/08/2026 Comments1: CONNIE -- NOT WORKING -- DIDNT CALL UNTI Comments2: L LATER -- CHARGED AN REI FEE RA 12:00 003-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 04/14/2026 Comments1: CONNIE BF _____ 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251449 2662 BIG GROVE CIR 72 04/08/2026 Comments1: KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM 630-927-2807 BF _____ 016-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/08/2026 BF _____ 017-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/08/2026 PBF _____ 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/08/2026 Comments1: KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM 630-927-2807 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 019-REI REINSPECTION 04/09/2026 Comments1: FINAL MECH - GAS PIPE IN BASEMENT GS _____ 020-EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 04/01/2026 Comments1: OKAY TO TEMP RA 23:00 AM 018-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20251460 2678 BIG GROVE CIR 80 04/20/2026 Comments1: MW BC _____ 019-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/30/2026 Comments1: KALIN BC _____ 020-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/30/2026 BC _____ 021-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/30/2026 PBF _____ 022-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/30/2026 Comments1: KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM BC 13:00 PM 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20251463 882 TIMBER OAK LN 58 04/10/2026 Comments1: MW BC 13:00 PM 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/27/2026 Comments1: JASON - 630-632-7433; JJACOBS@RALLYHOMES Comments2: .NET BC 13:00 PM 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/27/2026 Comments1: JASON - 630-632-7433; JJACOBS@RALLYHOMES Comments2: .NET BC 13:00 PM 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/27/2026 Comments1: JASON - 630-632-7433; JJACOBS@RALLYHOMES Comments2: .NET PBF 13:00 PM 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/27/2026 Comments1: JASON - 630-632-7433; JJACOBS@RALLYHOMES Comments2: .NET BC _____ 013-REI REINSPECTION 04/29/2026 Comments1: ROUGH FRAMING BC 23:00 AM 014-REI REINSPECTION 04/29/2026 Comments1: ROUGH ELECTRIC BC _____ AM 015-INS INSULATION 04/30/2026 Comments1: JASON BC 13:00 PM 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20251464 645 TIMBER OAK LN 21 04/10/2026 Comments1: MW DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/20/2026 Comments1: JASON BC _____ 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/20/2026 BC _____ 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/20/2026 PBF _____ 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/20/2026 Comments1: JJACOBS@RALLYHOMES.NET BC _____ 013-INS INSULATION 04/22/2026 Comments1: JASON BC 23:00 AM 014-INS INSULATION 20251465 1222 TIMBER OAK CT 83 04/01/2026 Comments1: JASON BC 23:00 AM 010-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20251466 2741 ELDEN DR 265 04/06/2026 Comments1: DARRELL BC 23:00 AM 011-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/06/2026 BC 23:00 AM 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/06/2026 PBF 23:00 AM 013-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/06/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BC 23:00 AM 014-INS INSULATION 04/09/2026 Comments1: DARRELL BC 23:00 AM 015-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/10/2026 Comments1: MW BC 23:00 AM 016-STP STOOPS 04/10/2026 Comments1: FRONT & REAR, MW, BATCH TICKETS RECEIVED Comments2: . BF _____ 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20251467 2861 MCMURTRIE WAY 256 04/23/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BF _____ 012-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/23/2026 BF _____ 013-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/23/2026 PBF _____ 014-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/23/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BC _____ 015-INS INSULATION 04/27/2026 Comments1: DARRELL DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC 13:00 PM 004-REI REINSPECTION 20251471 2011 RAINTREE RD 64 04/10/2026 Comments1: ROUGH FRAME BC 23:00 AM 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 20251481 2781 ELDEN DR 260 04/07/2026 Comments1: MW BC 23:00 AM 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/16/2026 Comments1: MW BC _____ 009-STP STOOPS 04/15/2026 Comments1: FRONT BC 23:00 AM 008-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 20251482 2791 ELDEN DR 259 04/15/2026 Comments1: MW RA 23:00 AM 009-STP STOOPS 04/17/2026 Comments1: FRONT -- MW BC _____ 010-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/27/2026 BC _____ 006-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20251483 2774 GOLDENROD DR 253 04/01/2026 Comments1: DARRELL BC 23:00 AM 008-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/16/2026 Comments1: MW BC 13:00 PM 009-REI REINSPECTION 04/23/2026 Comments1: BASEMENT FLOOR RA _____ 010-EPW PUBLIC WALK 20251484 2782 ELDEN DR 282 04/02/2026 BC 23:00 AM 011-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/16/2026 RA 23:00 AM 012-STP STOOPS 04/16/2026 Comments1: FRONT -- MW BF _____ 013-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/20/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BF _____ 014-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/20/2026 BF _____ 015-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/20/2026 PBF _____ 016-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/20/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BF _____ 017-INS INSULATION 04/23/2026 Comments1: CHECK ITEMS FROM ROUGH -- DARRELL.LINDBE Comments2: RG@LENNAR.COM DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC 13:00 PM 014-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20251485 2748 ELDEN DR 280 04/08/2026 Comments1: DARRELL BC 13:00 PM 015-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/08/2026 Comments1: DARRELL. BC 13:00 PM 016-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/08/2026 PBF _____ PM 017-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/08/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BF 13:00 PM 018-INS INSULATION 04/10/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BC _____ 013-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20251486 2768 ELDEN DR 281 04/15/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BC _____ 014-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/15/2026 BC _____ 015-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/15/2026 PBF _____ 016-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/15/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BC 23:00 AM 017-INS INSULATION 04/17/2026 Comments1: DARRELL PR _____ PM 008-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20251487 3367 CALEDONIA DR 182 04/09/2026 Comments1: JUAN PR 13:00 PM 009-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/09/2026 PR 13:00 PM 010-FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 04/09/2026 Comments1: JUAN PR 13:00 PM 011-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READ 04/09/2026 Comments1: JUAN BC 23:00 AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 20251492 4478 E MILLBROOK CIR 236 04/06/2026 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/10/2026 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM BC 23:00 AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 04/13/2026 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/16/2026 Comments1: KTELLEZ@NVRINC.COM DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 23 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 23 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC 23:00 AM 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/20/2026 Comments1: MW BC 23:00 AM 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/20/2026 Comments1: NW BC 12:00 008-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/23/2026 Comments1: ANDREW RA 23:00 AM 015-WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 20251493 4468 E MILLBROOK CIR 239 04/27/2026 Comments1: MW BC 23:00 AM 014-INS INSULATION 20251494 2627 SUTHERLAND CT 38 04/02/2026 Comments1: KALIN PR _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20251501 801 GREENFIELD TRN 54 04/22/2026 BC _____ 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/24/2026 Comments1: RICH BC 13:00 PM 004-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 20251502 2809 SILVER SPRING CT 243 04/08/2026 Comments1: JASON 708-227-3896 BC 13:00 PM 006-INS INSULATION 04/08/2026 Comments1: JASON 708-227-3896 RA 23:00 AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20260004 2558 EMERALD LN 0 04/23/2026 Comments1: FRONT DOOR -- PR 23:00 AM 001-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20260019 208 BEAVER ST 0 04/13/2026 Comments1: BRAD 630-816-8420 PR _____ 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/27/2026 Comments1: BRAD 630-816-8420 PR _____ 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/27/2026 PR _____ 004-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/27/2026 PR _____ 005-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/27/2026 RA 13:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260025 4548 MARQUETTE ST 1215 04/17/2026 Comments1: 2 HOLES BELL PLEASE NOT 36IN BF 23:00 AM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20260026 2765 ELDEN DR 262 04/29/2026 Comments1: ESS -- ADRIAN 312-459-6472 BF 23:00 AM 003-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/29/2026 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 24 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 24 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BF 23:00 AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20260036 594 BURNING BUSH DR 95 04/06/2026 Comments1: SOLAR -- RAM 224-412-0484 BF 23:00 AM 002-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/06/2026 PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 20260038 3561 RICHARDSON CIR 1066 04/02/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/07/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/09/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 006-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/13/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/14/2026 BC _____ 008-STP STOOPS 04/14/2026 RA 23:00 AM 009-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/17/2026 Comments1: RICK PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 20260039 3559 RICHARDSON CIR 1065 04/02/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/07/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/09/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 006-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/13/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/14/2026 BC _____ 008-STP STOOPS 04/14/2026 RA 23:00 AM 009-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/17/2026 Comments1: RICK PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 20260040 3557 RICHARDSON CIR 1064 04/02/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/07/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 25 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 25 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/09/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 006-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/13/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/14/2026 BC _____ 008-STP STOOPS 04/14/2026 RA 23:00 AM 009-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/17/2026 Comments1: RICK PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 20260041 3555 RICHARDSON CIR 1063 04/02/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/07/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/09/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 006-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/13/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/14/2026 BC _____ 008-STP STOOPS 04/14/2026 RA 23:00 AM 009-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/17/2026 Comments1: RICK PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 20260042 3553 RICHARDSON CIR 1064 04/02/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/07/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/09/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 006-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/13/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/14/2026 BC _____ 008-STP STOOPS 04/14/2026 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 26 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 26 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------RA 23:00 AM 009-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/17/2026 Comments1: RICK PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 20260043 3551 RICHARDSON CIR 1061 04/02/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/07/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/09/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 006-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 04/13/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/14/2026 BC _____ 008-STP STOOPS 04/14/2026 RA 23:00 AM 009-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/17/2026 Comments1: RICK RA 13:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260052 2288 GRANDE TRL CT 177 04/16/2026 Comments1: CARLA 815-460-3449 BC 13:00 PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20260057 2832 MCMURTRIE WAY 207 04/20/2026 Comments1: MW BC 13:00 PM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/22/2026 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 003-ESW SEWER / WATER 04/30/2026 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM BC _____ PM 004-BKF BACKFILL 04/30/2026 Comments1: MW BC 13:00 PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20260058 2838 MCMURTRIE WAY 208 04/20/2026 Comments1: MW BC 13:00 PM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/22/2026 Comments1: MW PBF _____ 003-ESW SEWER / WATER 04/30/2026 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM BC _____ PM 004-BKF BACKFILL 04/30/2026 Comments1: MW DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 27 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 27 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PBF 23:00 AM 004-ESW SEWER / WATER 20260059 2872 McMURTRIE WAY 214 04/01/2026 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM PBF _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/15/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BF _____ 006-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/15/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BC _____ 007-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/27/2026 Comments1: DARRELL PBF 23:00 AM 004-ESW SEWER / WATER 20260060 2852 McMURTRIE WAY 211 04/01/2026 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM PBF _____ 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/10/2026 Comments1: DARREL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BF _____ 006-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/15/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BF _____ 007-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/15/2026 Comments1: DARRELL.LINDBERG@LENNAR.COM BC _____ 005-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 20260061 2851 McMURTRIE WAY 257 04/01/2026 BC 23:00 AM 006-GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 04/09/2026 Comments1: DARRELL BC 23:00 AM 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/16/2026 Comments1: MW BC 23:00 AM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20260065 1103 REDWOOD RD 48 04/07/2026 Comments1: MARK 847-452-2518 BC _____ 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20260069 2620 SUTHERLAND CT 29 04/01/2026 RA 23:00 AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20260071 3159 JUSTICE DR 696 04/15/2026 Comments1: JOHN RA 23:00 AM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20260075 1610 CYPRESS LN 0 04/09/2026 Comments1: GINA 708-719-0886 BC 13:00 PM 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20260076 371 GARDEN CIR 13 04/01/2026 Comments1: PIERS -- SAM 847-654-8125 BC 22:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260078 3184 BOOMBAH BLVD 133 04/07/2026 Comments1: TONY DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 28 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 28 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------RA _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/09/2026 Comments1: FENCE PR 13:00 PM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20260080 111 W HYDRAULIC 0 04/02/2026 Comments1: MIKE PR 13:00 PM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/02/2026 PR 13:00 PM 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/02/2026 PR 13:00 PM 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/02/2026 RA 23:00 AM 005-WK SERVICE WALK 04/23/2026 Comments1: MIKE 630-465-5792 BC 23:00 AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20260083 3558 RICHARDSON CIR 134.1 04/22/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/24/2026 Comments1: CHRIS PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/28/2026 Comments1: DRWEISS@DRHORTON.COM BC 23:00 AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20260084 3556 RICHARDSON CIR 134.2 04/22/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/24/2026 Comments1: CHRIS PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/28/2026 Comments1: DRWEISS@DRHORTON.COM BC 23:00 AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20260085 3554 RICHARDSON CIR 134.3 04/22/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/24/2026 Comments1: CHRIS PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/28/2026 Comments1: DRWEISS@DRHORTON.COM BC 23:00 AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20260086 3552 RICHARDSON CIR 1344 04/22/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/24/2026 Comments1: CHRIS DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 29 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 29 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PBF _____ 003-WAT WATER 04/28/2026 Comments1: DRWEISS@DRHORTON.COM BC 23:00 AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20260088 664 W VETERANS PKWY UNIT 0 04/14/2026 Comments1: ROBIN 630-898-5900 BC 23:00 AM 002-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/14/2026 Comments1: ROBIN 630-898-5900 BC 23:00 AM 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20260089 381 BISCAYNE LN 1985 04/07/2026 Comments1: DECK PR 13:00 PM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20260090 824 CANYON TR 111 04/08/2026 Comments1: MASTER BATH REMODEL, BECKY@AMKITCHENA Comments2: NDBATH.COM PR 13:00 PM 002-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/08/2026 Comments1: MASTER BATH REMODEL, BECKY@AMKITCHENA Comments2: NDBATH.COM PR 13:00 PM 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/08/2026 Comments1: MASTER BATH REMODEL, BECKY@AMKITCHENA Comments2: NDBATH.COM PR 13:00 PM 004-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/08/2026 Comments1: MASTER BATH REMODEL, BECKY@AMKITCHENA Comments2: NDBATH.COM PR _____ 006-ABC ABOVE CEILING 20260092 520 E KENDALL DR 3 04/08/2026 PR _____ 006-ABC ABOVE CEILING 20260093 520 E KENDALL DR 3 04/08/2026 BC 23:00 AM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 20260094 625 TIMBER OAK LN 22 04/09/2026 Comments1: MW BC 23:00 AM 003-BKF BACKFILL 04/17/2026 Comments1: MW PR _____ 005-ESW SEWER / WATER 04/24/2026 Comments1: FAMILYSEWEROFFICE@YAHOO.COM BC _____ PM 006-BG BASEMENT AND GARAGE FLOOR 04/28/2026 Comments1: MW PR 23:00 AM 007-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/29/2026 Comments1: JASON: 630-632-7433; JJACOBS@RALLYHOMES. Comments2: NET DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 30 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 30 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------RA _____ AM 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20260095 4465 SARASOTA VE 1999 04/20/2026 Comments1: BETTY 312-607-9616 RA 13:00 PM 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20260101 1025 HAMPTON LN 231 04/14/2026 Comments1: SHAUNEE 815-272-1112 BC 23:00 AM 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20260103 496 SPICEBUSH CT 164 04/10/2026 Comments1: BOB BC _____ 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/10/2026 RA 23:00 AM 004-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20260104 2485 FAIRFIELD AVE 486 04/14/2026 Comments1: LUIS 773-567-8495 RA 13:00 PM 005-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 04/20/2026 Comments1: HOLE UNDER STEPS NEEDS TO BE FILLED. BC 23:00 AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20260105 3155 GRANDE TRAIL 1051 04/09/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/13/2026 Comments1: CHRIS PBF 13:00 PM 003-WAT WATER 04/16/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/21/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/24/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 006-REI REINSPECTION 04/28/2026 Comments1: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC BC 23:00 AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20260106 3157 GRANDE TR 1052 04/09/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/13/2026 Comments1: CHRIS PBF 13:00 PM 003-WAT WATER 04/16/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/21/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/24/2026 Comments1: CHRIS DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 31 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 31 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ 006-REI REINSPECTION 04/28/2026 Comments1: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC BC 23:00 AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20260107 3159 GRANDE TRL 1053 04/09/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/13/2026 Comments1: CHRIS PBF 13:00 PM 003-WAT WATER 04/16/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/21/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/24/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 006-REI REINSPECTION 04/28/2026 Comments1: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC BC 23:00 AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20260108 3161 GRANDE TR 1054 04/09/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/13/2026 Comments1: CHRIS PBF 13:00 PM 003-WAT WATER 04/16/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/21/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/24/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 006-REI REINSPECTION 04/28/2026 Comments1: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC BC 23:00 AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20260109 3163 GRANDE TR 1055 04/09/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/13/2026 Comments1: CHRIS PBF 13:00 PM 003-WAT WATER 04/16/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 32 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 32 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PBF _____ 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/21/2026 Comments1: CWTHOMPSON@DRHORTON.COM BC _____ 005-UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 04/24/2026 Comments1: CHRIS BC _____ 006-REI REINSPECTION 04/28/2026 Comments1: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC PR 23:00 AM 005-BKF BACKFILL 20260112 904 HAYDEN DR 56 04/09/2026 Comments1: REMY PR 23:00 AM 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/09/2026 Comments1: REMY BC 13:00 PM 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/15/2026 Comments1: REMY PR _____ 008-ESW SEWER / WATER 04/14/2026 BC _____ 009-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 04/27/2026 BF 23:00 AM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20260113 1124 WESTERN LN 75 04/14/2026 Comments1: SOLAR/ESS DREW 708-830-1242 BF 23:00 AM 003-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 04/14/2026 Comments1: SOLAR/ESS DREW 708-830-1242 RA 23:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260114 1148 GRACE DR 105 04/10/2026 RA _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/14/2026 Comments1: FENCE -- TONY RA _____ AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20260115 4448 SARASOTA AVE 2004 04/27/2026 Comments1: JOHN RA 23:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260116 471 BISCAYNE LN 1991 04/01/2026 Comments1: STEPHANIE BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20260117 54 W COUNTRYSIDE PKWY 0 04/29/2026 Comments1: SIGN RA 23:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260124 346 PENSACOLA ST 1209 04/13/2026 Comments1: ARISSA 708-316-9740 BC 23:00 AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20260125 1207B DEER STREET 0 04/01/2026 Comments1: MIKE 630-465-5792 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 33 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 33 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC 13:00 PM 002-FOU FOUNDATION 04/06/2026 Comments1: MIKE 630-465-5792 RA 23:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260126 2445 WYTHE PL 6 04/14/2026 RA _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/27/2026 Comments1: COUPLE OF PICKETS MISSING SCREW - HOMEOW Comments2: NER SAID HE WOULD TAKE CARE OF RA 23:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260128 451 BISCAYNE LN 1990 04/17/2026 Comments1: STEPHANIE 224-220-1042 RA 23:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260129 2847 CRYDER WAY 478 04/13/2026 Comments1: STEPHANIE 2242201042 RA 22:30 002-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260130 3182 MATLOCK DR 664 04/14/2026 Comments1: ADRIANA RA 13:00 PM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20260134 411 BISCAYNE LN 1988 04/10/2026 RA 23:00 AM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260137 364 DRAYTON COURT 49 04/06/2026 Comments1: ARISSA 708-316-9740 RA 23:00 AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20260142 1712 CALLANDER TR 55 04/23/2026 Comments1: BETTY -- REAR STOOP STEPS PUT OVER EXIST Comments2: ING STOOP PR 23:00 AM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20260146 2121 IROQUOIS LN 70 04/14/2026 Comments1: JUAN 616-294-7430 RA 22:00 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20260152 2677 EMERALD LN 384 04/30/2026 Comments1: TRAVIS RA 23:00 AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20260154 572 CHERRY CT 76 04/23/2026 Comments1: KEVIN -- PAP TOO HIGH RA 22:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260155 3338 GABRIEL DR 165 04/20/2026 Comments1: TONY RA _____ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/22/2026 Comments1: FENCE BC 23:00 AM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20260158 803 CANYON TR 110 04/24/2026 Comments1: ISAIAS 773-557-9695 BC 23:00 AM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/24/2026 Comments1: ISAIAS 773-557-9695 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 34 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 34 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BC _____ AM 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/24/2026 RA _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20260165 234 E VETERANS PKWY 1 04/15/2026 Comments1: TEMP TENT -- YOBANI BC 23:00 AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20260166 4561 HALFMOON DR B 344 04/16/2026 Comments1: HVAC RICHARD RA 23:00 AM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260167 3475 RYAN DR 3 04/10/2026 Comments1: CLASSIC FENCE RA 13:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260168 1011 INDEPENDENCE BLVD 6 04/30/2026 Comments1: monica. RA _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20260170 702 KENTSHIRE DR 120 04/17/2026 RA 23:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260171 3337 GABRIEL DR 172 04/30/2026 Comments1: TONY RA 13:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260172 627 ANDREA CT 3 04/17/2026 Comments1: MONICA RA 13:00 PM 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20260173 961 OMAHA DR 26 04/20/2026 Comments1: CHAD 630-296-6760 BC 23:00 AM 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/23/2026 Comments1: DECK --MACHELE RA 23:00 AM 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20260177 3182 MATLOCK DR 664 04/20/2026 Comments1: VICTOR RA 23:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260179 356 TYLER CREEK CT 85 04/22/2026 Comments1: JACKIE RA 23:00 AM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260182 2173 KINGSMILL ST 0 04/15/2026 Comments1: CHRIS 815-834-1200 BC 13:00 PM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20260184 414 ELM ST 0 04/13/2026 Comments1: HVAC RA 12:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20260186 2511 LYMAN LOOP 18 04/23/2026 Comments1: CONNIE -- 24 IN OFF ICE & WATER FROM INS Comments2: IDE WALL RA _____ 002-REI REINSPECTION 04/24/2026 Comments1: ICE & WATER RA 23:00 AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20260189 20 GAWNE LN 0 04/24/2026 Comments1: GRANT 630-465-6655 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 35 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 35 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------RA 23:00 AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20260190 910 HAYDEN DR 54 04/20/2026 Comments1: FELIPE 815-992-7100 RA 23:00 AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20260191 432 BISCAYNE LN 2018 04/27/2026 Comments1: JUSTIN RA 23:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260194 576 ALDER CT 41 04/21/2026 Comments1: ADRIANA BC _____ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20260201 689 DENISE CT 40 04/28/2026 Comments1: AGP - LEWIS 630-803-3412 - UNABLE TO ENT Comments2: ER PROPERTY TO CONDUCT INSPECTION. BC 23:00 AM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 20260206 105 E CENTER ST 0 04/29/2026 Comments1: FRONT PORCH -- MARTY 630-842-8646 BC 13:30 001-OCC OCCUPANCY INSPECTION 20260210 664 W VETERANS PKWY UNIT 0 04/16/2026 Comments1: OVERSTOCK MARKET BKF _____ 002-FFD BKFD FINAL INSPECTION 04/14/2026 RA 23:00 AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20260213 2236 FAIRFAX WAY 506 04/21/2026 Comments1: NICHOLAS 847-496-4333 RA 23:00 AM 002-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 04/21/2026 BC 13:00 PM 003-RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SF 04/22/2026 Comments1: NICOLETTE RA 13:00 PM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20260218 3405 RYAN DR 10 04/15/2026 Comments1: SERGIO 815-909-5737 RA _____ 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20260224 2823 CRYDER WAY 481 04/17/2026 RA 13:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20260253 1922 RAINTREE RD 5 04/29/2026 Comments1: ANDRES 312-402-0019 RA 13:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20260257 948 PURCELL ST 83 04/22/2026 Comments1: KARA 815-741-1635 RA 13:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20260264 605 GREENFIELD TRN 78 04/24/2026 Comments1: ADELA RA 23:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20260270 301 WALSH CIR 20 04/22/2026 Comments1: MACHELE RA 23:00 AM 001-PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 20260271 610 STATE ST 7 04/24/2026 Comments1: JAESON DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 36 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 36 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------RA _____ 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20260287 3245 LONGVIEW DR 44 04/27/2026 RA 23:00 001-ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & W 20260291 1187 WHEATLAND CT 130 04/30/2026 Comments1: KATRINA 630-355-0002 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 37 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 37 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: ADD ADDITION 4 AGP ABOVE-GROUND POOL 1 BDO COMMERCIAL BUILD-OUT 5 BSM BASEMENT REMODEL 16 CCO COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 2 COM COMMERCIAL BUILDING 7 CON CONCRETE PAD 2 DCK DECK 12 DRV DRIVEWAY 2 ESN ELECTRIC SIGN 2 ESS BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS 14 FNC FENCE 26 GEN STAND BY GENERATOR 1 HVC HVAC UNIT/S 3 MSC MISCELLANEOUS 3 PTO PATIO / PAVERS 12 REM REMODEL 14 ROF ROOFING 12 SFA SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED 231 SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 197 SGN SIGN 1 SLF SOLAR FARM 2 SOL SOLAR PANELS 6 TNT TEMPORARY TENT 1 WIN WINDOW REPLACEMENT 2 INSPECTION SUMMARY: ABC ABOVE CEILING 3 ADA ADA ACCESSIBLE WALK WAY 2 BG BASEMENT AND GARAGE FLOOR 1 BKF BACKFILL 7 BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 9 EDA DRIVEWAY, APRON 1 EFL ENGINEERING FINAL SITE 11 ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 25 EPW PUBLIC WALK 21 ESW SEWER / WATER 6 FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 28 FFD BKFD FINAL INSPECTION 1 FIN FINAL INSPECTION 49 FMC FINAL MECHANICAL 17 FOU FOUNDATION 15 FTG FOOTING 14 GAR GARAGE FLOOR 21 GPL GREEN PLATE INSPECTION 9 INS INSULATION 24 OCC OCCUPANCY INSPECTION 1 PHD POST HOLE - DECK 3 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 38 DATE: 05/01/2026 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 38 TIME: 09:26:45 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A0000 INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2026 TO 04/30/2026 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 21 PLF PLUMBING - FINAL OSR READY 15 PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 23 PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20 PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 15 PTO PREPOUR BASE FOR PATIO 27 REI REINSPECTION 27 REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 24 RFR ROUGH FRAMING RESCHECK SFD SFA 28 RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 24 ROF ROOF UNDERLAYMENT ICE & WATER 11 STP STOOPS 15 UGE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 11 WAT WATER 18 WK SERVICE WALK 16 WKS PUBLIC & SERVICE WALKS 15 INSPECTOR SUMMARY: BC BOB CREADEUR 236 BF B&F INSPECTOR CODE SERVICE 90 BKF BRISTOL KENDALL FIRE DEPT 1 GS GEORGE STEFFENS 11 PBF PLUMBER 62 PR PETER RATOS 58 RA AARON ROSA 120 STATUS SUMMARY: C BC 19 C BF 18 C BKF 1 C GS 1 C PR 1 C RA 30 I BC 204 I BF 42 I PBF 54 I PR 50 I RA 81 M BF 12 M GS 3 M PBF 2 T BC 13 T BF 18 T GS 7 T PBF 6 T PR 7 T RA 9 REPORT SUMMARY: 578 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Economic Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #3 Tracking Number EDC 2026-28 Property Maintenance Report for April 2026 Economic Development Committee – June 2, 2026 Informational None Please see the attached memo and case reports. Pete Ratos Community Development Name Department Page | 1 Property Maintenance Report April 2026 There were 14 cases heard in April 2026: 04/06/2026 N 5651 404 San Diego Ln Vacant Structures & Land Dismissed N 5652 402 San Diego Ln Vacant Structures & Land Dismissed N 5654 374 Santa Monica St Vacant Structures & Land Dismissed N 5655 376 Santa Monica St Vacant Structures & Land Dismissed N 5656 378 Santa Monica St Vacant Structures & Land Dismissed N 5617 362 Santa Monica St Vacant Structures & Land Dismissed N 5618 366 Santa Monica St Vacant Structures & Land Dismissed N 5619 390 Santa Monica St Vacant Structures & Land Dismissed N 5620 392 Santa Monica St Vacant Structures & Land Dismissed N 5621 394 Santa Monica St Vacant Structures & Land Dismissed N 5622 396 Santa Monica St Vacant Structures & Land Dismissed N 5623 398 Santa Monica St Vacant Structures & Land Dismissed N 5624 386 Santa Monica St Vacant Structures & Land Dismissed N 5625 364 Santa Monica St Vacant Structures & Land Dismissed Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Pete Ratos, Code Official CC: Bart Olson, Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Jori Contrino Date May 1, 2026 Subject: February Property Maintenance Page: 1 of 3 Case Report 04/01/2026 - 04/30/2026 Case # Case Date ADDRESS OF COMPLAINT TYPE OF VIOLATION STATUS VIOLATION LETTER SENT FOLLOW UP STATUS CITATION ISSUED DATE OF HEARING POSTED FINDINGS PUBLIC WORKS TO MOW 20260141 4/29/2026 Towns Of Kendall Grass/Weeds DUPLICATE 4/27/2026 4/29/2026 20260140 4/29/2026 Towns Of Kendall Grass/Weeds DUPLICATE 4/27/2026 4/29/2026 20260139 4/29/2026 2460 Mill Rd. Construction Noise IN VIOLATION 4/28/2026 20260138 4/29/2026 Towns Of Kendall Grass/Weeds DUPLICATE 4/27/2026 4/29/2026 20260137 4/28/2026 2460 Mill Rd. Construction Noise/Fence IN VIOLATION 4/28/2026 20260136 4/28/2026 4042 Brady St. Grass/Weeds CLOSED 20260135 4/28/2026 465 Winterberry Dr Grass/Weeds IN VIOLATION 20260134 4/28/2026 Beecher Rd/Gillespie Ln Fly Dump Mattress CLOSED 20260133 4/27/2026 577 Kendall Dr Grass/Weeds IN VIOLATION 20260132 4/27/2026 524 E Kendall Dr Grass/Weeds IN VIOLATION 20260131 4/27/2026 591 Windett Ridge Sidewalk Damage CLOSED 20260130 4/27/2026 304 River Rd Sewage Smell CLOSED Page: 2 of 3 20260129 4/27/2026 802 John St Dead Tree CLOSED 20260128 4/24/2026 431 San Diego Ln Grass/Weeds IN VIOLATION 4/24/2026 20260127 4/24/2026 224 Portage Ln Grass/Weeds IN VIOLATION 4/24/2026 20260126 4/24/2026 3405 Ryan Dr Raised Bbox CLOSED 20260125 4/24/2026 1991 S Bridge St Grass CLOSED COMPLIANT 4/24/2026 20260124 4/24/2026 Towns Of Kendall Grass/Weeds IN VIOLATION 4/27/2026 4/29/2026 20260123 4/22/2026 221 W Veteran Pkwy Erosion Control PENDING 20260122 4/22/2026 507 W BARBERRY CIR Incomplete Permit IN VIOLATION 4/22/2026 20260121 4/21/2026 2800 Route 47 Noise PENDING 20260120 4/21/2026 Parcel 0504431002 Route 71 Grass CLOSED 20260119 4/21/2026 501 W Kendall Dr Grass IN VIOLATION 20260118 4/20/2026 210 E Vanemmon Utility Cable CLOSED 20260117 4/20/2026 621 Greenfield Turn Grass/Weeds CLOSED COMPLIANT 20260116 4/16/2026 1555 W Corneils Rd Light CLOSED COMPLIANT 20260115 4/14/2026 122 Naden Ct Work No Permit IN VIOLATION 4/20/2026 6/1/2026 20260114 4/13/2026 Millbrook Cir Construction Debris CLOSED 3/27/2026 COMPLIANT 20260113 4/13/2026 507 W Kendall Dr Grass CLOSED COMPLIANT 20260112 4/10/2026 Fairfax/47 Roadway Obstruction CLOSED COMPLIANT 20260111 4/10/2026 304 River Rd. Foul Smell CLOSED Page: 3 of 3 20260110 4/8/2026 Kennedy Rd/Mill St Dirt In Roadway CLOSED COMPLIANT 20260109 4/8/2026 511 Birchwood Dr. Restoration PENDING 20260108 4/8/2026 1108 Mill St, Yorkville, IL Fly Dumping CLOSED 20260107 4/6/2026 Penmen/Prestwick Porta Potty on Side CLOSED 20260106 4/6/2026 2162 Henning Ln Vacant Lot Debris PENDING 20260105 4/6/2026 3741 BISSEL DR Noise CLOSED 20260104 4/6/2026 248 A Portage Ln Fire Alarm CLOSED COMPLIANT 20260103 4/2/2026 Shoeger Dr Roadway Obstruction CLOSED 4/2/2026 COMPLIANT Total Records: 39 5/1/2026 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/320/City-Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Community Development Economic Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #4 Tracking Number EDC 2026-29 Economic Development Report for May 2026 Economic Development Committee – June 2, 2026 Informational None Katelyn Gregory Administration Name Department 651 Prairie Pointe Drive • Yorkville, Illinois • 60560 Phone 630-209-7151 Monthly Report – June 2026 EDC Meeting - The United City of Yorkville May 2026 Activity New Development: - RV MD Renovations – 1207B Deer St – Fox Industrial Park: With over ten years of expertise in fabrication and modifications, Mike Pitstick is set to open RV MD Renovations this summer in a 2,500 square foot facility located in the new addition on Deer Street in Fox Industrial Park. A Yorkville resident, Mike is moving his business from Oswego to Yorkville and is eager to bring his skills to the community. The business will initially concentrate on RV repairs and modernizations, tackling issues including water damage, roof repairs, and managing extended warranty or insurance claims. While the primary focus will be on repair and modernization, there are plans to grow the existing services for converting school buses and trailers into RVs. With a commitment to quality and innovation, Mike's dedicated team is ready to meet the evolving needs of RV owners in Yorkville and the surrounding communities. - Monarch Academy of Dance – 111 W Hydraulic Ave – Riverside Plaza: Monarch Academy of Dance will be opening soon in the 5,000 square foot space along the Fox River in downtown Yorkville. Formerly the Reds Baseball training facility, the building has been elegantly renovated to house the Monarch Academy of Dance. Owner Amanda Hipperson is looking forward to relocating her dance studio from Aurora to Yorkville, where Amanda resides with her family. Scheduled to open its doors in the summer of 2026, the studio aims to create a nurturing environment where dancers of all ages and abilities can develop their skills and passion. With a mission to inspire personal growth and self-expression through dance, Monarch Academy of Dance is dedicated to providing a supportive and challenging atmosphere. Prospective students can find information on class offerings and audition dates by visiting the studio website at https://monarchacademyofdance.com/. - Just Lift Fitness Yorkville – 129 Commercial Dr, Unit 9 – Yorkville Business Center: Owners Jackie Errico and Linnea Lones are thrilled to bring their extensive experience in the fitness industry to a new private training studio in Yorkville this summer. They are set to open their second location of Just Lift Fitness, a premier luxury small-group private training studio, in the summer of 2026 in a 1,020 square foot space at CMR Health Group in Yorkville, following their first successful location in Clarendon Hills. With a wealth of experience in fields including corporate fitness, collegiate strength and conditioning, Jackie and Linnea have created a fitness experience that ensures a welcoming atmosphere and inspires personal development. Just Lift Fitness is dedicated to transforming lives through personalized fitness coaching, aiming to empower clients to achieve their fitness goals in a supportive environment that fosters confidence, growth, and transformation. Learn more about Just Lift Fitness Yorkville on their website at https://jlfitnesstraining.com/. - Skin 101 – 111 E Van Emmon St: Skin 101, owned by Stacy Watkins, is relocating from 101 W Van Emmon St. to the main floor of the newly renovated historic Farm Bureau building at 111 E Van Emmon St. Scheduled to open in the summer of 2026, the new location will offer an approximately 3,300 square foot space dedicated to providing a rejuvenating and luxurious experience for patrons. With a comprehensive selection of spa services, including skin treatments, lashes, brows, and nails, Skin 101 is committed to addressing all beauty needs with personalized care in a tranquil setting. Their skilled estheticians use premium products like the Eminence Organic skincare line and PCA peels to provide facials, eyebrow packages, eyelash extensions, lifts, full-body waxing, and more. Stop in and experience the luxury that Skin 101 has been providing to the Yorkville community for over 10 years. Discover their full range of services or book an appointment on their website at https://www.skin101yorkville.com/. - Blaze Printing Co. – 1443 Cannonball Trl – Courthouse Square: Elijah Dayal, owner of Blaze Printing Co, has been involved in 3D printing for about six years and launched his successful business two years. Now operating five 3D printers, Blaze Printing Co is scheduled to open in the 700 square foot space at 1443 Cannonball Trail in the summer of 2026. In addition to providing standard print shop services, Blaze Printing Co will offer a variety of 3D printing materials for sale and print-on-demand services, allowing customers to bring in files for printing or present ideas or objects for recreation by their skilled staff. Blaze Printing Co is dedicated to delivering tailored, creative solutions for brands, backed by exceptional service and competitive pricing. Their mission is to bring your vision to life with a commitment to quality and creativity. For more information, visit their website at https://blazeprintingco.com/. May 2026 Previously Reported Updates: - The Chatty Chair – 201 W Hydraulic Ave, Suite 10 - The District Salon Suites: Owner Malorie Parrish has expanded her successful salon, The Chatty Chair, with a second location. Specializing in lived-in color, blonding, hair extensions, and haircuts, the new salon is located in Suite 10 at The District Salon Suites in downtown Yorkville. Following the success of her first location in Oswego, which opened just over a year ago, Parrish is excited to bring her expertise and services to a broader clientele. The Chatty Chair opened in Yorkville on May 13, 2026. Clients are encouraged to book appointments now via the online booking platform at https://theyorkvillechattychair.glossgenius.com/. - Natural Edits and Aesthetics – 1941 S Bridge St – Fountain Village: With a Master's in Nursing Education and years of nursing and nursing education experience, Yorkville resident Christen Cotes is excited to bring Natural Edits and Aesthetics to Yorkville! Inspired by her personal journey and the benefits she has experienced through a holistic approach to wellness, Christen offers her clients a comprehensive approach to achieving their wellness and aesthetic goals. Natural Edits and Aesthetics provides a variety of services, including prescription skincare, Botox fillers, and other aesthetic treatments, all aimed at enhancing overall well-being and client confidence. The boutique space, a 200 square foot office suite located within Hair Creations at 1941 S Bridge St., promises a personalized and rejuvenating experience for each client. Natural Edits and Aesthetics opened on May 25, 2026. Book an appointment online today by visiting https://www.naturaleditsaesthetics.com/. - Continue working with a variety of other potential business owners. There are a variety of parties doing due diligence on space to lease and buildings, and land to purchase. Information will be forthcoming. - Attended ICSC in Las Vegas. Economic Development Staff attended the International Council of Shopping Centers (ISCS) conference in Las Vegas. Respectfully submitted, Katelyn Gregory & Lynn Dubajic Kellogg 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 kgregory@yorkville.il.us, lynn@dlkllc.com 630-800-0574 cell, 630-209-7151 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Economic Development Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #5 Tracking Number EDC 2026-30 C1 Yorkville – CHI-11 (Cyrus One) – PUD Amendment & Preliminary PUD Plan Economic Development Committee – June 2, 2026 Majority Approval Please see the attached memo. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department 1 REQUEST SUMMARY: The petitioner, C1 Yorkville, LLC (CyrusOne), is seeking approval of a Major Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment and Preliminary PUD Plan to amend Ordinance 2024-33, which approved the original special use PUD, and Ordinance 2026-09, which approved a Minor Amendment to the Planned Unit Development, for the approximately 228-acre CHI-11 data center campus. The initial application for amendment submitted in April 2026 proposed to revise the previously approved development from nine (9) two-story data center buildings totaling approximately 2,451,200 square feet with a maximum height of 70 feet, to eight (8) one-story standalone buildings totaling up to approximately 2,163,800 square feet with a maximum height of approximately 50 feet 10 inches, to be constructed in phases over an anticipated 10- to 20-year period. However, the petitioner recently updated their request to decrease the total building area of the campus from ~2,163,800 to ~1,854,805 square feet. The request also includes modifications to the overall campus layout, including reconfiguration and relocation of site access points and stormwater management basins, enhanced landscape treatments, and an increase in overall site coverage from approximately 28.7% to approximately 52.8%. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of Faxon Road and Eldamain Road, as illustrated below. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: May 28, 2026 Subject: PZC 2026-03 C1 Yorkville – CHI 11 (Cyrus One) Data Center Proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment & Preliminary PUD Plan 2 PROPERTY BACKGROUND: Original PUD The originally approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement for the C1 Yorkville (CHI-11) CyrusOne data center campus (Ordinance 2024-33) consisted of nine (9) buildings totaling 2.45 million square feet pursuant to Ordinance 2024-33 adopted in July 2024. As depicted below, the approved Preliminary PUD Plan depicts the multi-building data center campus with an 800,000 square foot on-site electrical substation intended to serve the entire development. Further, the 2024 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement established the following: Approved certain deviations from the base M-2 General Manufacturing District standards for the subject property related to building setbacks for interior lots, parking requirements, vehicular cross access, pedestrian circulation, off-street loading, landscape requirements internal to the site, certain mechanical screening requirements (subject to sound study approval), street design for lots, and appearance standards. Identified modification standard #12 “Regional Utility Improvements” applies to the subject property, as the proposed development will extend public utilities (water and sanitary) to and through the property resulting in recapturable payments to the developer when future property owners in the area benefit from connecting to such utility that had not previously existed. Minor Amended PUD Subsequent to the original Planned Unit Development approval, the petitioner requested and received approval of a Minor Amendment to the Preliminary PUD Plan in February 2026 to slightly modify the campus configuration. The amendment reduced the size of the previously approved substation from approximately 800,000 square feet to approximately 400,000 square feet and relocated the substation slightly to the east, resulting in the elimination of a previously approved building. As part of the revised layout, Buildings #6, #8, and #9 were repositioned to the south and east of the reconfigured substation area. The removal of Building #7 reduced the total approved building area from approximately 2,451,200 square feet to approximately 2,163,800 square feet. The amendment also 3 included corresponding modifications to the internal roadway network and stormwater management facilities to accommodate the revised substation footprint and associated grading requirements. PROPOSED MAJOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT: The proposed Major Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment primarily seeks to substantially revise the recently approved Minor Amended Preliminary PUD Plan by reconfiguring the campus from eight (8) two-story data center buildings totaling approximately 2.16 million square feet to eight (8) one-story data center buildings totaling approximately 1.85 million square feet. The amendment also proposes a reduction in the maximum building height from approximately 70 feet to 50 feet 10 inches, along with modifications to building footprints, mechanical yard locations, and the overall site layout to better accommodate evolving operational needs and construction efficiencies. The amended Preliminary PUD Plan further includes revised internal circulation patterns, relocated and modified access drives, updated parking and loading configurations, expanded landscaping and open space areas, and reconfigured stormwater management basins throughout the campus. The development will continue to include an approximately 400,000 square-foot electrical substation and associated utility infrastructure intended to support the phased construction of the campus over time. Primary full access to the site is proposed via a boulevard entrance from Eldamain Road through secured internal drive systems designed to accommodate employee, service, and visitor traffic. A secured secondary emergency access (right in/right out) is also proposed off of Eldamain Road, approximately 800 feet north of the primary access. Additionally, a gated full-access restricted for employees only is proposed off of Beecher Road. The petitioner has indicated that CyrusOne has secured full electrical capacity allocation for the project from the utility provider and is scheduled to receive the first electrical transformers for the campus later this fall. The petitioner anticipates energizing the site before the end of 2027, with occupancy of the first building anticipated by the end of the first quarter of 2028. Initial construction activities commenced earlier this spring and currently consist primarily of site grading operations associated with access improvements and development of the electrical substation area. Below are summaries of various aspects of the proposed major amendment to the Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) Plan for the data center campus: 4 Zoning & Land Uses of Surrounding Properties Since the approval of the original Planned Unit Development for this property in July 2025, there have been ownership changes and land use approvals affecting certain surrounding properties which are highlighted below in the following table: Zoning Land Use North A-1 (Kendall County) ComEd Substation/Transfer Station - Utility Use South A-1 (Kendall County) BNSF Railroad Agricultural, Residential and Business Uses (One of the two residential properties located on Faxon Road is currently under contract by the Petitioner) Transportation Land Use East A-1 SU (Kendall County) A-1 SU (Yorkville) Agriculture/Former Residence (Purchased by Petitioner) Solar Farm (Constructed in 2025) West Eldamain Road M-2 General Manufacturing (Plano) A-1 (Kendall County) Transportation Land Use Menards Distribution Center Residential/Farm Below is a summary site data table comparing the originally approved Preliminary PUD Plan, the recently approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan amendment, and the currently proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan amendment: Originally Approved Preliminary PUD Plan Recently Approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan Proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan % Change from Minor PUD Preliminary Plan Number of Buildings 9 8 8 N/A Size of Buildings 152,000 – 287,400 sq. ft. 152,000 – 287,400 sq. ft. 129,350 – 246,387 sq. ft. -14.9% -14.3% Total Building Area 2,451,200 sq. ft. 2,163,800 sq. ft. 1,854,805 sq. ft. -14.3% Number of Stories 2 2 1 -50% Height of Buildings 55’ (top of building) 70’ (top of equipment) 55’ (top of building) 70’ (top of equipment) 36’ (top of building) 50’-10” (top of equipment) -34.5% -27.4% Number of Parking Spaces 432 378 379 +0.26% Percent Building Coverage 12.3% 10.9% 17.3% +58.7% Percent Site Coverage 35.6% 28.7% 52.75% +83.8% Number of Site Access Drives 2 Eldamain Rd (Primary/Single Drive) Faxon Rd (Emergency Access) 2 Eldamain Rd (Primary/Double Drive) Faxon Rd (Emergency Access) 3 Eldamain Road (Primary/Double Drive) Eldamain Road (Emergency Access) Beecher Road +50% Number of Stormwater Basins 6 6 7 +16.7% Substation Area 800’ x 1,000’ (800,000 sq. ft) 436’ x 920’ (401,120 sq. ft.) 436’ x 920’ (401,120 sq. ft.) N/A Distance of Nearest Residential Structure Undetermined 485 ft. – 543 ft. 833 ft. – 732 ft. +71.8% - +34.8% 5 APPLICABILITY OF MAJOR PUD AMENDMENT: Per Section 7.1 of the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement established the criteria for major amendments which results in one or more specified changes to the approved Preliminary PUD Plan are proposed. The following two (2) deviations from the site data standards set forth on the Site Plan of the originally approved PUD Agreement apply: 1. The provided building coverage increased from 10.9% on the Site Data Standards of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to 17.3% on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan. 2. The provided site coverage increased from 28.7% on the Site Data Standards of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to 52.75% on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan. Further, in addition to the criteria set forth above, Section 7.1 of the approved Planned Unit Development agreement also references major amendment criteria established in Section 10-8-8(G)(2) of the UDO as binding, of which the following applies: 1. Reduction in open space by more than five (5) percent. a. The building coverage increased 58.7% from 10.9% on the Site Data Standards of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to 17.3% on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan. 2. Alterations to alignment of roads, utilities, or drainage. a. Proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan illustrates significant changes to the site access and road alignments off of Eldamain Road and Beecher Road, as well as reconfigurations to onsite stormwater management basins. ENERGY USE STANDARDS: The previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement for the C1 Yorkville (CHI-11) CyrusOne data center campus (Ordinance 2024-33) was established prior to the City’s adoption of Energy Industrial Use standards for data centers via Ordinance 2025-53 in June 2025. Sections 2.1 and 4.3 of the previously approved PUD Agreement permit the waiver of subsequently adopted, more stringent Energy Industrial Use regulations, effectively vesting the development standards within the current agreement for a period of 20 years. However, the petitioner has agreed to comply with the provisions contained in the recently adopted Section 10-4-10 of the UDO as outlined below: 1. Landscape Buffer - Section 10-4-10(A)(1) of the UDO requires data center developments to maintain a minimum 100-foot landscape buffer when adjacent to non-manufacturing land uses, inclusive of an 8-foot tall berm when adjacent to residential and dedicated exclusively for dense landscaping including trees and shrubs but not utilized for stormwater detention, roadways, walking trails or surface parking. Additionally, a minimum 100-foot landscape buffer is required when a data center is adjacent to a public roadway and shall consist of a Transition Zone D landscape buffer. a. The proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan illustrates a 100’ wide landscape buffer along Eldamain Road and Beecher Road. Additionally, the plans illustrate a 50’ wide landscape buffer along a portion of the north property line adjacent to the Commonwealth Edison parcel and a varying depth landscape buffer of 50’-100’ wide along the southern property line. b. Due to the presence of the existing residential land uses to the south on Faxon Road, staff recommends a minimum 8-foot tall berm be installed along this portion of the campus. The petitioner has proposed an 8-foot tall berm but notes the berm cannot be continuous, as there are portions along the Faxon Road right-of-way which provides overland stormwater drainage. c. Additionally, staff recommends the petitioner install a shared use trail along Beecher Road within the City’s existing right-of-way and dedicate a 25’-30’ outlot along Eldamain Road for a future shared use path. The petitioner has indicated a 6 willingness to accommodate this request as there is sufficient right-of-way along Beecher Road and Eldamain Road, but requests the City own and maintain the trail. The petitioner will maintain the landscaping within this area. 2. Building Separation - Section 10-4-10(A)(3) of the UDO requires a minimum of a 500-foot building separation from the nearest data center building or structure (primary or accessory) to the nearest residential or commercial structure. a. As indicated above, the nearest data center building proposed on the major amendment to the Preliminary PUD Plan to a residential structure is ~833 feet along Faxon Road and ~732 feet along Eldamain Road, exceeding the City’s minimum distance requirement. 3. Operational Testing - Section 10-4-10(A)(6) of the UDO requires operational testing of emergency backup generators be limited to between the hours of 11am to 5pm on weekdays only, non-holidays. a. The petitioner has provided written confirmation of compliance with this standard and will be a condition of the PUD amendment. 4. Nuclear Energy - Section 10-4-10(A)(7) of the UDO strictly prohibits data centers from using, generating, storing, or deploying nuclear energy as a power source within the City. This includes, but is not limited to, nuclear reactors, small modular reactors (SMRs), or any other nuclear-based energy. a. The petitioner has provided written confirmation of compliance with this standard and will be a condition of the PUD amendment. 7 5. Phasing Plan - Section 10-4-10(A)(8) of the UDO requires the implementation of a phased construction plan that minimizes impacts on residential structures by prioritizing initial development at the farthest distance from existing residential structures. a. The previously approved Preliminary PUD Plan included a nine (9) phased development plan with each phase consisting of one (1) building and associated stormwater basin. The petitioner has provided an illustrated phasing plan for the C1- Yorkville CHI 11 Campus which indicates a three (3) phased development schedule. i. Phase 1, which includes the site grading and construction entrance to the substation, is currently under construction. ii. Phase 2, located in the central part of the site, includes the area covering six (6) buildings and four (4) stormwater basins. Building construction order and timing will be determined by tenant demand with each building taking approximately 18 months to construct. iii. Phase 3 will include two (2) buildings and three (3) stormwater basins at the northwest corner of the property. This phase’s building construction timing will also be based on tenant demand with each building taking approximately 18 months to construct. 8 6. Fencing - Section 10-4-10(A)(9) of the UDO requires fencing be constructed of security style aluminum, steel, wrought iron, or similar materials. Chain-link or barbed wire fencing is prohibited along public facing edges and properties adjacent to residential land uses. a. The petitioner proposes to install an eight foot (8’) tall steel security style fence around the perimeter of the data center campus buildings behind the landscape buffer area. 7. Lighting and Photometric Plan - Section 10-4-10(A)(10) of the UDO requires lighting and photometric plans must be submitted at the time of application and adhere to the City’s outside lighting standards. a. The photometric plan is to be provided with an application for final plat of subdivision or at such time the Developer submits for a building permit and will be a condition of the PUD amendment. 8. Traffic Management Plan - Section 10-4-10(A)(11) of the UDO requires a Traffic Management Plan be provided during construction, including a communication strategy and an on-site point of contact during construction. a. The petitioner will provide a Traffic Management Plan as part of the building permitting process and will be a condition of the PUD amendment. 9. Battery Storage - Section 10-4-10(A)(12) of the UDO requires battery storage systems shall be located a minimum of 50 feet away from any adjacent structure and must be readily accessible by Bristol Kendal Fire Protection District (BKFD) for firefighting efforts. a. The petitioner has provided written confirmation that no utility scale battery energy storage is proposed for the data center campus. 10. Emergency Operations Plan – Section 10-4-10(A)(13) of the UDO requires an Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) be submitted and approved by the City and the Bristol Kendal Fire Protection District (BKFD) prior to issuance of a building permit and must include: (1) Procedures for fire suppression, hazardous material spills, evacuation, and communication in case of an incident; (2) The location of any battery storage systems; (3) Training sessions/drills and or walkthroughs with fire and police shall be required prior to occupancy permit; (4) Designated contacts for emergency services and a plan to broadcast information if an incident could affect the public; and (5) Must work with KenCom emergency managers to be part of text or siren alert systems. a. The petitioner has provided written confirmation of compliance with this standard and will be a condition of the PUD amendment. 11. Building Code Enhanced Standards - Section 10-4-10(A)(14) of the UDO requires installing advanced early fire detection in server rooms, using fire-resistive construction beyond code minimums on walls facing neighborhoods, or providing additional hazardous material safeguards. Compliance with National Fire Protection Association 855 is also required. a. The petitioner has provided written confirmation of compliance with this standard and will be a condition of the PUD amendment. Appearance Standards The proposed updated elevations continue to primarily feature light-colored precast concrete panels, complemented by medium and dark aluminum composite panel accents and a glass curtain wall system at the entrance. Additional design elements include prefinished metal coping and horizontal and vertical relief lines, which help break up the building mass and provide visual interest. While the buildings are now designed as single-story structures, the main entrance will feature a two-story element accommodating approximately 32,000 square feet of office space, with an overall height of 36 feet. The remainder of the data center building will have a height of 24 feet, excluding the rooftop equipment penthouse. 9 Mechanical Screening Per Section 10-5-4 Screening of the Unified Development Ordinance, ground/wall-mounted and roof mounted mechanical units that are visible from any public right-of-way or adjacent residential property shall be screened from public view. The previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement allowed the petitioner to deviate from this requirement by screening only the ground-mounted mechanical equipment but was not required to provide screening for any rooftop mechanical units. The ground-mounted mechanical equipment in the Major PUD Preliminary Plan will no longer be screened as previously proposed with vinyl fencing equal to the height of the generator units (excluding any stacks protruding above the unit) but will now have a solid screen wall constructed of a light-colored concrete panel approximately 18’ – 24’ tall providing full-height coverage of the exterior equipment within this “mechanical yard”. 10 Comprehensive Plan The 2016 Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as “General Industrial,” which is intended to accommodate a broad range of warehousing and manufacturing activities generally located adjacent to the Eldamain Corridor and the BNSF Railway line. Both the originally approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) and the currently proposed Major PUD Amendment and Preliminary PUD Plan for the data center campus are consistent with the underlying M-2 General Manufacturing zoning designation. Supporting Reports/Studies As part of the application submittal, several supporting reports/studies prepared by outside consultants were provided by the petitioner to address specific concerns or comments related to the proposed data center campus development. Below is a summary of each of those reports and any City staff or City consultant review comments, where applicable: 1. Noise Study - The petitioner has provided a preliminary noise study for the subject property dated April 22, 2026, as prepared by Trinity Consultants. It is noted that the study utilizes sound measurements taken in three (3) locations in September 2024. a. The acoustical study submitted by the petitioner evaluated the anticipated operational noise impacts associated with the proposed data center campus, including rooftop mechanical equipment, cooling infrastructure, generators, and electrical equipment. The study concluded that the proposed development is expected to comply with the City’s applicable daytime and nighttime sound level standards at surrounding property lines through the incorporation of mitigation measures such as equipment screening, building orientation, acoustical barriers, and mechanical yard placement. The analysis further indicated that the revised one-story campus layout and reduced building heights help consolidate and better shield mechanical equipment areas, thereby reducing projected off- site noise impacts when compared to the previously approved configuration. b. The City’s acoustical consultant, Soundscape Engineering, reviewed the submitted noise study in a memo dated May 8, 2026. They concluded, while the listed mitigations are of the appropriate scale and type to allow the project to meet the noise ordinance, additional information is needed to sufficiently review the study findings. c. The petitioner has stated that a revised Noise Study will be provided to address the comments from staff and the consultant. 2. Data Center Impact Analysis – The petitioner has provided an assessment of the potential electric system reliability and cost impacts of the proposed 960-megawatt (MW) data center development dated 2026, as prepared by The Power Bureau, LLC. a. The study evaluated the electrical infrastructure and regional power delivery requirements associated with the proposed data center campus, including utility demand, transmission coordination, substation capacity, and phased energization of the site. The study concluded that the project is not anticipated to negatively impact the reliability or stability of the broader regional electrical grid, as the required electrical capacity has been planned for and allocated through coordination with the utility provider and regional transmission infrastructure. The report further noted that power delivery to the campus will occur in phases tied to utility improvements, transformer installations, and transmission upgrades intended to maintain overall grid reliability while supporting the long-term operational needs of the development. b. The petitioner has stated that a revised Data Center Impact Analysis study will be provided to anticipate a maximum power load of 654 MW. 3. Fiscal Benefits Report – The petitioner has provided a fiscal benefits or tax revenue analysis of the proposed data center campus dated March 2026, as prepared by Gruen Gruen + Associates. 11 a. The Fiscal Benefits Report concluded that the proposed data center campus is anticipated to generate substantial long-term fiscal benefits for the City of Yorkville and other local taxing bodies through significant increases in property tax revenues, utility taxes, permit fees, and other development-related revenues. However, it is important to note that the property is wholly within the Plano School District #88. The analysis further indicated that the projected revenues generated by the development are expected to substantially exceed the anticipated demand for municipal services due to the relatively low employment density and limited public service impacts typically associated with data center operations. The report also estimates that the phased construction of the campus is expected to generate significant short-term economic activity and construction-related spending in addition to the long-term tax base benefits associated with the completed development. b. The petitioner has stated that a revised Fiscal Benefits Report will be provided to address staff’s comments and an anticipated maximum power load of 654 MW. 4. Economic Impact Report – The petitioner has provided an economic impact report of the proposed data center campus development dated February 2026, as prepared by Gruen Gruen + Associates. a. The Economic Impacts Report concluded that the proposed data center campus is expected to generate substantial direct and indirect economic benefits for Yorkville and Kendall County through construction activity, long-term operational investment, and increased local spending. The report identified significant short-term economic impacts associated with multi-year construction employment, contractor spending, and material procurement, as well as ongoing long-term benefits from permanent jobs, utility investment, and expanded commercial tax base activity. b. The petitioner has stated that a revised Economic Impact Report will be provided to reflect the updated reduced building square footage. 5. Traffic Impact Study – The petitioner has provided a Traffic Impact Study for the proposed data center campus development dated March 24, 2026, as prepared by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona (KLOA), Inc. a. The Traffic Impact Study evaluated existing and projected traffic conditions associated with the proposed data center campus, including construction traffic, employee traffic, service vehicle circulation, and site access operations along Eldamain Road and surrounding roadway corridors. The study concluded that the data center campus is anticipated to generate relatively low daily traffic volumes compared to other industrial or commercial developments of similar size due to the limited number of on-site employees during normal operations. The analysis further determined that, with the proposed roadway access improvements and internal circulation design, the surrounding transportation network is expected to continue operating at acceptable levels of service during both construction and long-term operation of the facility. b. The City’s engineering consultant, EEI, Inc., reviewed the Traffic Impact Study in a memo dated May 4, 2026. As part of its review, EEI recommended that the study be updated to incorporate projected traffic impacts associated with the recently approved Project Steel and Project Cardinal data center developments located to the north. EEI further recommended evaluating potential mitigation measures for the existing signalized intersection at Eldamain and Galena Roads, as well as assessing cumulative impacts to adjacent roadway corridors, including Eldamain Road and Corneils Road. c. The petitioner has stated that a revised Traffic Impact Study will be provided to address staff’s comments and reflect the updated reduced building square footage. 6. Natural Resources Information (NRI) Report - The petitioner has provided a Natural Resources Information report for site of the proposed data center campus dated June 2024, as prepared by Kendall County Soil & Water Conservation District. 12 a. The Natural Resources Information Report evaluated existing environmental features on the subject property, including wetlands, floodplain areas, drainage patterns, woodlands, topography, and other natural resource constraints that may be affected by the proposed data center campus development. The report concluded that the site can be developed in a manner that generally avoids or minimizes impacts to identified natural resources through the use of engineered stormwater management systems, grading controls, landscape buffering, and compliance with applicable federal, state, and local permitting requirements. The analysis further identified that portions of the site contain regulated environmental features requiring ongoing coordination with permitting agencies and implementation of mitigation measures as part of future engineering and construction activities. b. Updated Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) reports have been provided by the petitioner. STAFF COMMENTS: The proposed revised Preliminary PUD Plan for the C1 Yorkville – CHI-11 (CyrusOne) data center campus is generally consistent with the standards of the Unified Development Ordinance governing approval of a Major Amendment to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The petitioner has submitted written responses addressing the applicable approval standards, which will be incorporated into the public hearing record. Additionally, while the proposal includes revisions to the campus layout, building footprints, and overall square footage, the modifications do not substantially alter the overall character, use, or intent of the previously approved Planned Unit Development. Staff anticipates that the petitioner will submit the updated studies referenced above for review by the City’s engineering and acoustical consultants prior to the Economic Development Committee meeting, with formal staff comments on the supplemental studies to be provided before the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. It is important to note that the previously approved PUD deviations, including allowances related to interior building setbacks, minimum parking requirements, vehicular cross-access, pedestrian circulation, off-street loading, parking lot and interior landscaping requirements, and lot frontage standards, remain in effect. These previously approved entitlements, along with the Preliminary Plan approved under the prior Minor PUD Amendment, would remain valid should the requested Major PUD Amendment not be approved. Accordingly, the public hearing for the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment and Preliminary PUD Plan is scheduled for the June 10, 2026 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, with tentative final consideration by the City Council scheduled for June 23, 2026. Staff will be available at the meeting to address any questions regarding the request. Attachments: 1. Copy of Petitioner’s Original Application 2. Legal Description 3. Copy of Ordinance 2024-33 Approving a Planned Unit Development Agreement with C1 Yorkville, LLC. 4. Copy of Ordinance 2026-09 Approving a Minor Amendment to the Approved Planned Unit Development for C1 Yorkville, LLC. 5. Updated Cover Letter dated May 28, 2026 prepared and submitted by Rosanova & Whitaker, Ltd., attorney, on behalf of C1 Yorkville, LLC, petitioner. 6. Updated Project Narrative (Petition for Development Approval) dated May 28, 2026 prepared and submitted by Rosanova & Whitaker, Ltd., attorney, on behalf of C1 Yorkville, LLC, petitioner. 7. Major Change & Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plan, prepared by Pinnacle Engineering Group and dated 05/14/26 8. Landscape Design Color Exhibit, prepared by Pinnacle Engineering Group and dated 05/14/2026. 9. Preliminary Engineering Plan, prepared by Pinnacle Engineering Group and dated 05/14/26. 10. Color Building Rendering and Exterior Elevations, prepared by Corgan and dated 05/14/26. 11. CHI-11 Infrastructure Phasing Exhibit, prepared by Pinnacle Engineering Group and dated 05/14/26. 13 12. Residential Setback Comparison Exhibit, prepared by Pinnacle Engineering Group and dated 05/14/26. 13. Petitioner’s Response to Staff’s Plan Council memorandum dated May 6, 2026. 14. EcoCAT Letters 15. SHPO Correspondences 16. Noise Study, prepared by Trinity Consultants and dated April 22, 2026. 17. Data Center Impact Analysis – An Assessment of Potential Electric System Reliability and Cost Impacts of a Proposed Data Center in Yorkville, prepared by The Power Burau, LLC dated 2026. 18. The Fiscal Benefits of the Proposed CyrusOne C1 Data Center Development in Yorkville, prepared by Gruen Gruen + Associates and dated March 2026. 19. The Economic Impacts of the Proposed CyrusOne C1 Data Center Development in Yorkville, prepared by Gruen Gruen + Associates and dated February 2026. 20. Traffic Impact Study Proposed Data Center, prepared by KLOA and dated March 24, 2026. 21. Plan Council memorandum dated May 6, 2026 22. EEI, Inc. memorandum dated May 4, 2026 23. Soundscape Engineering memorandum dated May 8, 2026 24. Public Hearing Notice 25. Link to previous submittal documents: https://www.yorkville.il.us/940/C1-Yorkville-Cyrus-One-CHI-11- Data-Cente X500X500X25,000X5,000$31,000 PARCEL ONE: THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 18 AND THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 19, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4, 1030.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 3352.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD, 844.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH QUARTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 18, 231.91 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 852.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 36 SECONDS WEST, 514.80 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 24 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 1816.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL TWO: THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4, 1917.41 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH QUARTER LINE OF SAID SECTION, 3126.88 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 223.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST, 886.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST, TO A POINT ON SAID WEST LINE, 3352.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 886.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL THREE: THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4, 1929.92 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, 565.21 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 59 DEGREES, 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST 913.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 191.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 23 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, 820.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST, TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION, SAID POINT BEING 1917.41 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION AS MEASURED ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION, 1671.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION, 722.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION, 702.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL FOUR: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH QUARTER LINE, 3437.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 223.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SAID SECTION, 1102.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 12 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE CHICAGO BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD, 1423.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT 231.91 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF SAID QUARTER LINE AS MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE, 1147.75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID QUARTER LINE, 1731.26 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 02-18-100-006 COMMONWEALTH EDISON, % OSWEGOLAND PARK DISTRICT 3220 GROVE RD OSWEGO, IL, 60543 01-13-100-003 COMMONWEALTH EDISON, % OSWEGOLAND PARK DISTRICT 3220 GROVE RD OSWEGO, IL, 60543 01-13-400-005 MENARD INC 4777 MENARD DR EAU CLAIRE, WI, 54703 02-18-300-002 C1 YORKVILLE LLC 2850 N HARWOOD ST STE 2200 DALLAS, TX, 75201 02-18-300-001 C1 YORKVILLE LLC 2850 N HARWOOD ST STE 2200 DALLAS, TX, 75201 02-18-300-003 C1 YORKVILLE LLC 2850 N HARWOOD ST STE 2200 DALLAS, TX, 75201 02-18-300-004 C1 YORKVILLE LLC 2850 N HARWOOD ST STE 2200 DALLAS, TX, 75201 02-19-100-004 C1 YORKVILLE LLC 2850 N HARWOOD ST STE 2200 DALLAS, TX, 75201 02-19-100-005 C1 YORKVILLE LLC 2850 N HARWOOD ST STE 2200 DALLAS, TX, 75201 02-18-400-004 C1 YORKVILLE LLC 2850 N HARWOOD ST STE 2200 DALLAS, TX, 75201 01-13-400-009 MENARD INC 4777 MENARD DR EAU CLAIRE, WI, 54703 01-13-400-014 MENARD INC ATTN: PROPERTIES DIVISION 5101 MENARD DR EAU CLAIRE, WI, 54703 01-13-400-012 MENARD INC ATTN: PROPERTIES DIVISION 5101 MENARD DR EAU CLAIRE, WI, 54703 01-13-400-011 MENARD INC ATTN: PROPERTIES DIVISION 5101 MENARD DR EAU CLAIRE, WI, 54703 01-13-400-004 SANCHEZ, ERIK HECTOR PEREZ 12029 FAXON RD PLANO, IL, 60545 01-13-400-013 MENARD INC ATTN: PROPERTIES DIVISION 5101 MENARD DR EAU CLAIRE, WI, 54703 01-24-200-011 BRUMMEL FAMILY TRUST 4 13349 C FAXON RD PLANO, IL, 60545 01-24-200-001 TOCHIMANI, JOSE 220 ALEXIS ST PLANO, IL, 60545 01-24-200-020 BRUMMEL FAMILY TRUST 4 13349 C FAXON RD PLANO, IL, 60545 01-24-200-021 TWK LLC 3029 ELDAMAIN RD PLANO, IL, 60545 01-24-200-018 FEECE OIL COMPANY 1700 HUBBARD ST BATAVIA, IL, 60510 01-24-200-018 CITY OF PLANO ATTN ZOILA GOMEZ 17 E MAIN ST PLANO IL 60545 02-19-100-001 BRUMMEL FAMILY TRUST 4 13349 C FAXON RD PLANO, IL, 60545 02-19-100-002 SCHMIT, PETER & CHERYL 11800 FAXON RD PLANO, IL, 60545 02-19-100-003 CAMACHO, MIGUEL & SANDRA E 11728 FAXON RD PLANO, IL, 60545 02-19-501-001 BN&SF RAILWAY CO PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 961089 FORT WORTH, TX, 76161-0089 02-18-501-001 BN&SF RAILWAY CO PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 961089 FORT WORTH, TX, 76161-0089 02-19-100-013 YORKVILLE NEXUS IV LLC % GREEN DOOR CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC 145 S WELLS ST STE 1800 CHICAGO, IL, 60606 02-19-100-013 YORKVILLE NEXUS IV LLC c/o SHANNON WESTBERG 30 CHESTNUT AVENUE CLARENDON HILLS IL 60514 02-19-100-012 YORKVILLE NEXUS IV LLC % GREEN DOOR CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC 145 S WELLS ST STE 1800 CHICAGO, IL, 60606 02-19-100-012 YORKVILLE NEXUS IV LLC c/o SHANNON WESTBERG 30 CHESTNUT AVENUE CLARENDON HILLS IL 60514 02-19-200-012 DANIELS MALINSKI YORKVILLE FAMILY LLLP 405 E SHERIDAN RD LAKE BLUFF IL 60044 02-18-400-008 DANIELS MALINSKI YORKVILLE FAMILY LLLP 405 E SHERIDAN RD LAKE BLUFF IL 60044 02-19-200-013 DANIELS MALINSKI YORKVILLE FAMILY LLLP 405 E SHERIDAN RD LAKE BLUFF IL 60044 02-18-400-009 DANIELS MALINSKI YORKVILLE FAMILY LLLP 405 E SHERIDAN RD LAKE BLUFF IL 60044 02-18-400-007 LOFTUS, ROBERT M & ILDEFONSA LIV TRUST 11159 FAXON RD YORKVILLE, IL, 60560 02-18-400-001 JYJ LLC 2622 BEECHER RD YORKVILLE, IL, 60560 02-18-400-001 C1 YORKVILLE LLC 2850 N HARWOOD ST STE 2200 DALLAS, TX, 75201 PRIMARY ENTRANCE BEECHER ROADELDAMAIN ROADRAILRO A D BUILDING 8 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=647.0 BUILDING 9 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=647.0 BUILDING 6 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=647.5 POND 6 BUILDING 3 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=648.5 BUILDING 2 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=649.0 BUILDING 4 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=648.5 BUILDING 1 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=649.0 BUILDING 5 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=648.0 POND 5POND 2 POND 1 POND 4 POND 3 SUBSTATION (436' X 920') FFE=±648.5 530.6'30.0'±233.6' 30.0' 75.0'275.4'925.0'436.0'30.0'221.3'M-2 ZONING 30' WATER LINE EASEMENT 150' SETBACK EASEMENT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT A-1 ZONING 50' SETBACK EASEMENT 50' SETBACK EASEMENT A-1 ZONING A-1 ZONING 30' WATER LINE EASEMENT 50' SETBACK EASEMENT 50' SETBACK EASEMENT 30' WATER LINE EASEMENT EMERGENCY ENTRANCE 150' PROPOSED FUTURE EASEMENT 50' SETBACK EASEMENT © COPYRIGHT 2025SHEET PEG JOB No.PEG PMSTART DATESCALEPINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP PINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP www.pinnacle-engr.comCHICAGO OFFICE: 1051 E. MAIN ST. | SUITE 217 EAST DUNDEE, IL 60118 (847) 551-5300 ENGINEERING I NATURAL RESOURCES I SURVEYING PLAN I DESIGN I DELIVER CHICAGO I MILWAUKEE : NATIONWIDE w w w .p i n n a c l e -e n g r .c o m REVISIONS IL DESIGN FIRM 184.006289-0010 PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN C1 YORKVILLE PUD (CHI 11) - PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN6097.00-ILBDJ11/21/251"=200'1 1 1" = 200'0 400' GRAPHICAL SCALE (FEET) NORTH YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS C1 YORKVILLE PUD (CHI 11) WETLANDS PROPOSED BUILDING STORMWATER POND LEGEND PROJECT AREA EQUIPMENT YARD SECURITY FENCE PREVIOUS SITE PLAN DESIGN SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA ±9,956,767.47 SF (±228.57 AC) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT N/A SETBACKS FRONT (WEST) REQUIRED 25' FRONT (WEST) PROVIDED 150' REAR (EAST) REQUIRED 0' REAR (EAST) PROVIDED 60' SIDE (NORTH & SOUTH) REQUIRED 20' SIDE (NORTH & SOUTH) PROVIDED 50' TRANSITIONAL SIDE N/A *SETBACKS APPLY ONLY TO THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PROPERTY IS RESUBDIVIDED. THERE SHALL BE NO SETBACKS APPLICABLE TO THE INTERNAL LOT LINES. PARKING DATA CENTER PARKING RATIO 0.2 SPACES PER 1,000 SF REQUIRED PARKING (# SPACES)433 PROVIDED PARKING (# SPACES)378 ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED (# SPACES)8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED (# SPACES)24 COVERAGE MINIMUM LOT SIZE N/A MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 85.0% PROVIDED BUILDING COVERAGE 10.9% MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 85.0% PROVIDED SITE COVERAGE 28.7% MAXIMUM FAR 85% PROVIDED FAR 21.7% BUILDING DATA BLDG #SIZE HEIGHT (TOP OF BLDG) HEIGHT (TOP OF EQPT.) BLDG 1 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 2 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 3 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 4 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 5 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 6 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 7 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 8 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 9 152,000 SF 55'-0"70'-0" TOTAL 2,163,800 SF N/A N/A X500X500X25,000X5,000$31,000 PARCEL ONE: THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 18 AND THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 19, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4, 1030.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 3352.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD, 844.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH QUARTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 18, 231.91 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 852.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 36 SECONDS WEST, 514.80 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 24 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 1816.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL TWO: THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4, 1917.41 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH QUARTER LINE OF SAID SECTION, 3126.88 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 223.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST, 886.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST, TO A POINT ON SAID WEST LINE, 3352.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 886.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL THREE: THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4, 1929.92 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, 565.21 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 59 DEGREES, 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST 913.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 191.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 23 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, 820.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST, TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION, SAID POINT BEING 1917.41 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION AS MEASURED ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION, 1671.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION, 722.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION, 702.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL FOUR: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH QUARTER LINE, 3437.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 223.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SAID SECTION, 1102.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 12 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE CHICAGO BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD, 1423.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT 231.91 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF SAID QUARTER LINE AS MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE, 1147.75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID QUARTER LINE, 1731.26 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Rosanova & Whitaker, Ltd. 445 Jackson Avenue, Suite 200 Naperville, Illinois 60540 Phone: 630-355-4600 Fax: 630-352-3610 www.rw-attorneys.com May 28, 2026 Krysti Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 RE: SUBMITTAL – C1 Yorkville LLC – Approximately 230 acres north of Faxon Road on the east side of Eldamain Road – Major Amendment to Planned Unit Development Dear Ms. Barksdale-Noble, As you are aware, this firm represents C1 Yorkville LLC (“C1”) regarding the redevelopment of its approximately 230-acre property located north of Faxon Road on the east side of Eldamain Road (“Property”). We have reviewed the comments provided by the City in the memorandum dated May 6, 2026. Please accept the materials submitted herewith as part of our resubmittal package. We look forward to working with the United City of Yorkville. In support of our application, please find the following revised and/or supplemental documentation: 1. Comment Response Letter 2. Project Narrative (Petition for Development Approval) 3. Preliminary Planned Unit Development 4. Preliminary Engineering Plan (Previously titled: Concept PUD Plan) 5. Phasing Exhibit 6. Setback Exhibit 7. Landscape Plans 8. Building Elevations 9. EcoCAT letter 10. SHPO Correspondence Additional reports and studies will be forthcoming. We are finalizing revisions to reports and studies that were initially submitted for City review in April. We are also working on supplementary reports based on feedback from the Plan Council meeting. I expect additional information will be submitted next week. Sincerely, Russell G. Whitaker, III Russell G. Whitaker, III Attorney for C1 Yorkville, LLC russ@rw-attorneys.com 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) COUNTY OF KENDALL ) ) UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ) PETITION FOR MAJOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE UNDERSIGNED Petitioner, C1 Yorkville LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (hereinafter the “Petitioner”), respectfully petitions the United City of Yorkville (the “City”) for a major amendment to a special use for a planned unit development as detailed on the plans submitted herewith for the Property (as defined below). BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. The Petitioner, C1 Yorkville LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having an office located at 2820 N. Harwood Street, Suite 2200, Dallas, TX 75201, is the owner of the Property comprising of +/- 228 acres located at the northeast corner of Eldamain Road and Faxon Road in the City of Yorkville, which property is legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof (the “Property”). 2. The Property was originally annexed to the City pursuant to Ordinance No. 2005- 48 on May 24, 2005; 3. The Property is zoned M-2 General Manufacturing District under the United City of Yorkville Unified Development Ordinance (the “Code”); 4. On July 9, 2024, the City approved a special use for a planned unit development and a Planned Unit Development Agreement (the “PUD Agreement”) for the Property; 5. Pursuant to the PUD Agreement, the City approved development of the Property as an Energy Industrial Use as generally depicted on the Preliminary PUD Plan (the “Preliminary PUD Plan”) attached hereto as Exhibit B. 2 6. The Preliminary PUD Plan specifically approved development of the Property with nine (9) two-story data center buildings comprising 2,451,200 square feet of total building area. 7. On February 10, 2026, the City approved a Minor Amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development and the amended PUD Plan (the “Amended PUD Plan”) a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 8. Shortly after the City’s approval of the Amended PUD Plan, Petitioner pulled necessary and appropriate site development permits and commenced construction pursuant to the Amended PUD Plan. 9. Petitioner now seeks a Major Change to the Amended PUD Plan as reflected on Exhibit D (the “CHI 11 PUD Plan”). 10. With the Major Change, Petitioner proposes to: i) replace the eight (8) two-story buildings approved pursuant to the Amended PUD Plan with eight (8) single-story buildings; and ii) reduce the total permitted square footage of buildings, all as reflected on the CHI 11 PUD Plan. 11. Petitioner has submitted the appropriate supporting details for approval of the Major Change to the Planned Unit Development as set forth herein. PROJECT SUMMARY Petitioner is a wholly owned subsidiary of CyrusOne. CyrusOne is a leading global data center developer and operator specializing in the delivery of state-of-the-art digital infrastructure solutions that serve some of the world’s foremost technology companies. CyrusOne owns and operates over 60 data centers across nine countries. In Illinois, CyrusOne owns and operates data center campuses in Aurora and Lombard. CyrusOne is also in the process of developing new Illinois campuses in Aurora, Wood Dale, Yorkville, and Sangamon County. 3 As reflected in the Jones Lange LaSalle (“JLL”) North America Data Center Report for year-end 2025, surging investment in the data center industry reflects strong institutional confidence in the sector’s outlook. JLL found vacancy rates at existing data centers are at a historic low of 1% for a second consecutive year, despite unprecedented levels of construction. Vacancy at historic lows reflects sustained structural demand rather than cyclical imbalance. JLL goes on to state that bubble concerns are difficult to reconcile with 99% sector occupancy, particularly given that the largest data center tenants rank among the most profitable and highest-rated companies globally. As it relates to new construction, JLL found that 92% of capacity is precommitted, either through binding lease agreements or owner-occupied development. Taken together, these dynamics point to vacancy remaining in the low single digits through 2030. In the Chicago market, JLL notes that there are no 10+ MW contiguous blocks available, which is driving tenants to commit to capacity 18-24 months in advance. With these fundamentals, Petitioner is well positioned to seize upon immediate demand with the expectation that the first building will be delivered to market in Q1 2028. Construction on the Property commenced earlier this spring with site grading associated with access to the Property and the electrical substation. CyrusOne has obtained allocation of electrical capacity necessary for the project, is scheduled to take delivery of the first electrical transformers for the Yorkville campus later this fall, and expects to have the site energized before the end of 2027. CyrusOne plans to commence building construction this fall with the goal of establishing occupancy for that first building by the end of the first quarter of 2028. CyrusOne is well positioned to seize upon market demand to facilitate build-out of the Property. The overall layout of the CHI 11 PUD Plan is generally consistent with the Amended PUD Plan. The CHI 11 PUD Plan either maintains or increases the setbacks that were established with 4 the Preliminary PUD Plan and affirmed with the Amended PUD Plan. Primary ingress/egress will occur via a boulevard style connection to Eldamain Road, consistent with the Amended PUD Plan. With the CHI 11 PUD Plan, the secondary means of ingress/egress to Faxon Road has been eliminated in favor of a larger consolidated stormwater basin along the south property line. This reconfigured stormwater basin will create a natural transition south to Faxon Road. A secondary roadway connection is now contemplated via Beecher Road to the east. This secondary roadway connection will be gated, no truck traffic will be permitted, and is intended exclusively for employee egress. Notably, Petitioner owns the adjacent property along Beecher Road which Petitioner acquired for purposes of facilitating utility improvements required for development of the Property. Finally, Petitioner is working with Kendall County Department of Transportation regarding a restricted emergency-only right-in-right-out movement in the northernmost section of the Property along Eldamain Road. Revised building elevations have been submitted along with the Major Change application. The revised elevations are generally consistent with the approved plans, maintaining similar architectural styling, building materials, and color palette. With the revised elevations, the main entrance or primary architectural component of the buildings is a two-story office component, comprising approximately 32,000 square feet, which is consistent with the original approvals for the project. This two-story feature, which is approximately 36’ in height, will help define the entrance to the buildings and create a clear focal point. The buildings are generally oriented such that the office component addresses the adjacent road frontage or entrance to the community. The primary mass of the building is the single-story box which measures approximately 24’ in height. This primary single-story component of the building also includes a mechanical penthouse. The mechanical penthouse incorporates an acoustic screen wall around all four sides of the mechanical 5 penthouse. This rooftop screening, which is recessed from the primary façade of the building, extends to approximately 51’ in height. The revised elevations reflect a significant reduction in the height approved with the PUD Agreement, which permits 55’ tall buildings with equipment screening to 70’. The side of each building also includes a mechanical yard, as depicted on the CHI 11 PUD Plan. The mechanical yard is designed as an integral component of each building. Full height screening is provided for each mechanical yard. STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USE APPROVAL FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO UDO SECTION 10-8-5. D. 1. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the Special Use will not be unreasonably detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. The proposed development of the Property will promote the public health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the City. The Property was originally annexed and zoned in the City in 2005. Despite the underlying zoning, the Property set fallow, without productive use consistent with the underlying zoning district for nearly 20 years. The data center campus, which was preliminarily approved in 2024, is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the underlying M-2 General Manufacturing zoning for the Property. With the City’s 2024 approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan, the City determined that the Preliminary PUD Plan would not be unreasonably detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. With the proposed major change, the CHI 11 PUD Plan depicts a total building area of 1,854,805 square feet, which is 308,995 square feet less than the Amended PUD Plan and 596,395 square feet less than the Preliminary PUD Plan. Changes to the layout of the buildings and the square footage of the buildings does not alter the character or intent of the approved planned unit development. Moreover, with the changes reflected on the CHI 11 PUD Plan, Petitioner seeks approval of single-story buildings in lieu of the two-story buildings approved with the Preliminary 6 PUD Plan. Because the proposed major change is consistent with the character and intent of the Preliminary PUD Plan, reduces the size of approved buildings, and increases the setback to existing residential uses, the major change will not be unreasonably detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. The development of the Property will facilitate substantial investment in the City that will produce new construction jobs, long-term employment opportunities, and significant new tax revenue streams. In support of this premise, Petitioner hired Gruen Gruen + Associates to prepare reports evaluating both the economic (the “Economic Impact Report) and the fiscal (“the “Fiscal Impact Report”) impacts of the proposed development. The Fiscal Impact Report estimates that development of the Property will result in an average of 277 construction jobs annually for a period of ten years. In addition to the construction jobs, the development is estimated to support 1,881 permanent jobs in Kendall County, with annual labor income estimated at $187.4 million or approximately $99,700 per job. The operations of the campus are estimated to generate total annual economic output within Kendall County of approximately $1,053.2 billion dollars. The campus will also generate significant new tax streams, including projected annual tax revenue of $16,794,087 to the City at full buildout. Based on the construction schedule outlined above, Petitioner anticipates that the City would begin collecting significant new revenue in 2028. By 2029, tax receipts to the City will likely eclipse $2,000,000 and steadily grow for the next decade. The campus will establish the City as a regional leader in data center capacity, position the community as an employment base within a growing sector of the economy, and produce transformational new tax revenue streams. 2. The Special Use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within or near the neighborhood in which it is to be located. 7 With the approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan in 2024 the City found that the special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within or near the neighborhood. With the proposed major change, which reduces the size and scale of the development occurring on the Property, the proposed major change will only mitigate any perceived concerns raised during the 2024 approval process. Immediately north of the Property is a very large, regional ComEd substation that is located in unincorporated Kendall County. This substation supplies power for the region and is a significant component of the utility infrastructure necessary to serve the data center campus. In fact, the data center campus is strategically and intentionally located immediately adjacent to the ComEd substation that will provide critical power supply to the data center campus. Eldamain Road defines the western boundary of the Property, with areas west of Eldamain Road being located in the Village of Plano and zoned M-2 General Manufacturing District. Uses within the adjacent Plano M-2 District include the Menards Distribution Center, Grundy Redi Mix, and a Groot transfer station. While there are some residential uses to the southwest, those homes are beyond applicable setback requirements under City of Yorkville zoning requirements. Faxon Road and the BNSF rail line collectively establish the southern boundary of the Property. Parcels south of Faxon Road are zoned A-1 in Kendall County. While there are two residential structures south of Faxon Road, those structures are beyond applicable setback requirements under the City of Yorkville zoning requirements. Beecher Road establishes the eastern boundary of the Property. East of Beecher Road is a new solar farm that was recently developed in the City of Yorkville. The area north of the solar farm is a separate parcel owned by Petitioner and which will immediately be utilized for purpose of extending electrical service to the Property. 8 3. The establishment of the Special Use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. With the approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan in 2024, The City found that the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Here, Petitioner does not seek a new special use, but seeks a major change to the special use that was approved for the Property in 2024. With the proposed Major Change, Petitioner does not fundamentally alter the concept or the use approved by the City in 2024, but seeks to adjust the scale of the project, moving from taller two-story structures to single-story buildings that are more consistent with the scale of development in the region. 4. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage or other necessary facilities have been or shall be provided. The Property is generally well-positioned in terms of access and utilities. Since the City’s 2024 approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan, Petitioner has actively coordinated with the City to facilitate necessary and appropriate utility improvements that are proximate to the Property. Specifically, the Petitioner has funded the extension of municipal sanitary and water services that will serve not only the Property, but also future development in the area. With the extension of public utility services the property is adequately served by public utilities. Moreover, the extension of utilities that was facilitated by Petitioner, who bore significant up-front cost for said utility extensions, materially improves the City’s utility infrastructure and facilities additional development in the area around the Property. While the Petitioner has coordinated with the City on water and sanitary service, Petitioner has coordinated with ComEd regarding electrical service. Petitioner and ComEd have coordinated plans for the extension of electrical service from the adjacent ComEd substation to the Property. Additionally, Petitioner is undertaking construction of a new on-site electrical substation that will serve the Property. 9 Petitioner engaged the services of a professional traffic engineer to review ingress/egress conditions and the capacity of the surrounding roadway network to accommodate site generated traffic associated with the proposed data center development. The Traffic Impact Study prepared by KLOA, Inc., has been submitted with Petitioner’s application documents. The Traffic Impact Study shows that there is sufficient reserve capacity in the surrounding roadways to accommodate the proposed development. Petitioner also engaged the services of Pinnacle Engineering Group to provide civil engineering services associated with the proposed development of the Property. Pinnacle’s Preliminary Engineering Plans depict the anticipated improvements to the Property, including stormwater management facilities necessary to facilitate the development of the data center. 5. Adequate measures shall be taken to provide ingress or egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. The primary means of ingress/egress to the Property is via Eldamain Road. At Eldamain Road, access will be restricted via a series of manned security gates. Ingress/egress is designed with a boulevard style section that will allow rejected vehicles to be directed back to Eldamain Road. Inside the gate, all drive aisles are privately owned and operated. Petitioner has relocated the secondary point of ingress/egress from Faxon Road to Beecher Road and added an emergency access point along Eldamain Road. With these changes, a larger contiguous stormwater facility is now located south of the data center buildings and will provide natural separation to the nearest residential dwellings. The Traffic Impact Study supports the proposed access points and confirms that the existing roads have sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate anticipated site traffic. 6. The proposed Special Use is not contrary to the objectives of the City’s adopted Comprehensive Plan. 10 The City adopted its most current Comprehensive Plan in 2016. According to the Comprehensive Plan, to accomplish the future development of the City’s industrial areas, the community planning objectives include: (i) removing barriers to industrial area investment and facilitating development through the use of incentives and regulatory relief; (ii) concentrating industrial attraction efforts in near-term industrial areas, such as the Yorkville Business Center and the Fox Industrial Park; (iii) facilitating redevelopment of industrial areas to accommodate industrial uses of different sizes and to achieve more modern office park settings; and (iv) encouraging best practices in industrial building/park design, stormwater management, landscape buffering and placemaking. The Comprehensive Plan identifies five (5) industrial areas with developable land, which include the Property. The proposed Major Change will advance the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan in facilitating industrial development through regulatory relief. REVIEW STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO UDO SECTION 10-8-8. E. 1. Plan and Policy Alignment. The Planned Unit Development is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and other adopted plans and policy documents of the City. The City approved the Preliminary PUD Plan in 2024, finding that it was consistent with the City’s plans and policies. The proposed major change is consistent with the intent and character of the Preliminary PUD Plan. The proposed major change, which reduces the size and scale of development on the Property, is likewise consistent with the City’s plans and policies. The Comprehensive Plan specifically references the development of the Lincoln Prairie Industrial Properties (which include the Property) in its vision strategy, stating that “..future Industrial development should occur as a planned industrial subdivision, similar to the Yorkville Business Center…”. By granting Petitioner’s request for a planned unit development in 2024, and 11 with approval of Petitioner’s proposed major change, the City will facilitate this goal in the near term, much in advance of the long-term strategy outlined in its Comprehensive Plan. By approving development of the Property as a planned unit development, the City ensured the coordinated and thoughtful planning of a large-scale industrial property and established a framework for the type of phased investment that is generally required for a development of this size and scale. The approval of the proposed major change is consistent with this regulatory framework and preserves the character and intent of the development originally approved in 2024. 2. Integrated Design with Identifiable Centers and Edges. The Planned Unit Development shall be laid out and developed as a unit in accordance with an integrated overall design, in which the various land uses function as a cohesive whole and support one another. The design shall provide identifiable centers, which form focus areas of activity in the development, and edges, which define the outer borders of the development, through the harmonious grouping of buildings, uses, facilities, public gathering spaces, and open space. In 2024 the City found that the Preliminary PUD Plan reflected unified development in accordance with an integrated overall design. The two (2) land uses function as a cohesive whole and support one another; one for the electric substation and the other for data center building uses. As reflected on the Amended PUD Plan, access improvements, certain phase 1 detention improvements, and the new electric substation are currently under development by Petitioner. With the proposed major change, Petitioner proposes to reconfigure the buildings and the stormwater detention around those improvements already under construction. With this reconfiguration, Petitioner substitutes predominantly single-story buildings for the previously approved two-story buildings. With this change from two-story to single-story buildings, Petitioner has expanded the area of the Property being developed, including that area originally designated for “future development” north of the main entrance on Eldamain Road. However, Petitioner has also reduced the total square footage of building area to be constructed on the Property. 12 Consistent with the approved Preliminary PUD Plan, the data center campus will be developed as a gated and secure facility whereby public access will be strictly limited. The CHI 11 PUD Plan maintains the emphasis on perimeter treatments, which is how most residents will interact with the data center campus. Petitioner has maintained perimeter setbacks that were established with the Preliminary PUD Plan and affirmed with the Amended PUD Plan. A black aluminum security fence, as specified on the landscape plan, will enclose the perimeter of the Property. The fence is strategically located inside of the northernmost and southernmost detention basins. The fence is also located inside of the scheduled landscape buffer that extends along public facing sides of the Property. With the substantial perimeter landscape buffer and the setbacks incorporated into the West Complex PUD Plan, the much shorter single-story data center buildings now proposed by Petitioner will not be a dominant feature of the broader landscape. 3. Public Welfare. The Planned Unit Development is designed, located, and proposed to be operated and maintained so that it will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property and will not substantially increase the danger of fire or otherwise endanger the public health, safety, and welfare. The proposed CHI 11 PUD Plan will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property and will not substantially increase the danger of fire or otherwise endanger the public health, safety, and welfare. Petitioner strategically oriented data center improvements toward the core of the Property. Petitioner has emphasized open space around the perimeter of the Property, preserving setbacks approved with the Preliminary PUD Plan, and significantly expanding the size and scale of the southern detention basin located along Faxon Road. Planned perimeter setbacks are significantly greater than what is required under the zoning ordinance and upgraded perimeter landscape treatments will combine to create a substantial buffer to adjacent property. 13 4. Compatibility with Adjacent Land Uses. The Planned Unit Development includes uses which are generally compatible and consistent with the uses of adjacent parcels. If the uses are not generally compatible, all adverse impacts have been mitigated through screening, landscaping, public open space, and other buffering features that protect uses within the development and surrounding properties. With the approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan in 2024, the City confirmed Petitioner’s position that the plan for development of a data center campus is generally compatible with and consistent with the uses of adjacent parcels. With the major change, Petitioner is not changing the purpose or intent of the approved Preliminary PUD Plan. To the contrary, Petitioner is making changes which should benefit adjacent properties due to the reduction in size and scale of the development contemplated for the Property. Consistent with the approved Preliminary PUD Plan, the CHI 11 PUD Plan incorporates landscape buffers and building setbacks that exceed City Code requirements. 5. Impact on Public Facilities and Resources. The Planned Unit Development is designed so that adequate utilities, road access, stormwater management, and other necessary facilities will be provided to serve it. The Planned Unit Development shall include such impact fees as may be reasonably determined by the City Council. These required impact fees shall be calculated in reasonable proportion to the impact of the Planned Unit Development on public facilities and infrastructure. The City specifically considered impact on public facilities and resources with the 2024 approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan. At that time, Petitioner and the City entered into certain agreements to facilitate necessary and appropriate utility and roadway improvements to serve the planned unit development. With the proposed major change, there is no relevant change in impacts to public facilities or resources. Nevertheless, Petitioner has updated plans and studies, which have been submitted in support of the proposed Major Change, to reflect the impact of the planned unit development. As reflected in Petitioner’s plans and studies, the development reflected on the CHI 11 PUD Plan will not pose a significant burden on public facilities and infrastructure, but will 14 improve public facilities and infrastructure in a manner that will likely facilitate additional investment on nearby properties. Notably, with the proposed major change, Petitioner has submitted a study by The Power Bureau, LLC, which evaluates potential electric system reliability and cost impacts associated with the proposed development of the Property (the “Power Bureau Study”). As detailed in the Power Bureau Study, the development of the Property will not reduce the reliability of the regional grid or the local utility network. Additionally, the data center campus is unlikely to cause cost increases for ComEd’s current customers. 6. Archaeological, Historical or Cultural Impact. The Planned Unit Development does not substantially adversely impact an archaeological, historical, or cultural resource, included on the local, state, or federal register, located on or off the parcel(s) proposed for development. The proposed development of the Property does not substantially adversely impact an archaeological, historical, or cultural resource, included on the local, state, or federal register, located on or off the parcel(s) proposed for development. Petitioner has/will undertake necessary and appropriate studies to evaluate wetlands/waters, threatened/endangered species, and historical resources. Petitioner will coordinate necessary approvals with the City as a condition to the construction of improvements to the Property. REQUIRED DEVIATIONS FROM UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE With the approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan and the PUD Agreement in 2024, the City approved certain deviations from Code. With the proposed major change, Petitioner is not seeking additional deviations, but seeks to carry forward the deviations approved in 2024. WHEREFORE, by reason of the foregoing, the undersigned Petitioner requests the City’s Plan Council, Economic Development Committee, Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council take the necessary and appropriate action to grant a major amendment to a special use for 15 a planned unit development with development allowances as detailed on the plans submitted herewith for the Property and pursuant to the appropriate provisions of the City’s Code. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 28th day of May, 2026. PETITIONER: C1 YORKVILLE LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Rosanova & Whitaker, Ltd. Attorney for the Petitioner 16 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property PARCEL ONE: THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 18 AND THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 19, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4, 1030.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 3352.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD, 844.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH QUARTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 18, 231.91 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 852.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 36 SECONDS WEST, 514.80 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 24 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4 1816.32 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL TWO: THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 1/4, 1917.41 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH QUARTER LINE OF SAID SECTION, 3126.88 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 223.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST, 886.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST, TO A POINT ON SAID WEST LINE, 3352.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 886.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL THREE: THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS EAST ALONG 17 THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4, 1929.92 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 27 SECONDS EAST, 565.21 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 59 DEGREES, 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST 913.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 191.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 23 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, 820.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS WEST, TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION, SAID POINT BEING 1917.41 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION AS MEASURED ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION, 1671.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION, 722.59 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION, 702.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL FOUR: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 07 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH QUARTER LINE, 3437.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 223.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SAID SECTION, 1102.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 12 SECONDS EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE CHICAGO BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD, 1423.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT 231.91 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF SAID QUARTER LINE AS MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OFWAY LINE, 1147.75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID QUARTER LINE, 1731.26 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. COMMONLY KNOWN AS approximately 228 acres of vacant land located at northeast corner of Eldamain Road and Faxon Road in Bristol Township, in unincorporated Kendall County PINs: 02-18-300-001; 02-18-300-002; 02-18-300-003; 02-18-300-004; 02-19-100-004; 02-19-100-005; and 02-18-400-004 18 EXHIBIT B Preliminary PUD Plan (Attached) BEECHER ROADELDAMAIN ROADFAXON ROAD RAILRO A D WETWET WETWETW E T W E T WETWET 30.00' TYP. 75.00' TYP. 75.00' 1000.00' 800.00' +/-233.60' 275.40' 221.27' 129.78' 121.26' 30.00' 530.60' 30.00' 36.00 TYP. BUILDING 1 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=649.0 BUILDING 2 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=649.0 BUILDING 4 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=648.5 BUILDING 5 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=648.0 BUILDING 8 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=647.0 SUBSTATION (800' x 1000') FFE=648.5 BUILDING 9 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=647.0 BUILDING 3 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=648.5 BUILDING 6 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=647.5 BUILDING 7 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=647.0 POND 1 POND 2 POND 3 POND 4 POND 5 POND 6oooo o o o o o o o o oooooooo o o o o o o o o o o oo o o oooooooooooooooooooooo o o oo o o o o o ooooooCYRUS ONE - YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS - PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN SCALE:1" = 200' AT FULL SIZE (24x36) DATE: May 21, 2024 Project Area Current Colo Build Equipment Yard Stormwater Pond Wetlands Security Fenceooooo 150' PROPOSED FUTURE EASEMENT 50' SETBACK EASEMENT 50' SETBACK EASEMENT 30' WATER LINE EASEMENT 50' SETBACK EASEMENT30' WATER LINE EASEMENT 50' SETBACK EASEMENT 150' SETBACK EASEMENT 30' WATER LINE EASEMENT 60' SETBACK EASEMENT M-2 ZONING A-1 ZONING A-1 ZONING A-1 ZONING YORKVILLEPLANO UNINCORPORATED PROJECT SITE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA 9,956,767.47 SF (228.57 AC +/-) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT N/A SETBACKS* FRONT (WEST) REQUIRED 25'-0" FRONT (WEST) PROVIDED 150'-0" REAR (EAST) REQUIRED 0'-0" REAR (EAST) PROVIDED 60'-0" SIDE (N + S) REQUIRED 20'-0" SIDE (N + S) PROVIDED 50'-0" TRANSITIONAL SIDE N/A *SETBACKS APPLY ONLY TO THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PROPERTY IS RESUBDIVIDED, THERE SHALL BE NO SETBACKS APPLICABLE TO INTERNAL LOT LINES. PARKING DATA CENTER PARKING RATIO 0.2 SPACES PER 1,000 SF REQUIRED PARKING (# SPACES)490 PROVIDED PARKING (# SPACES)432 ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED (# SPACES)9 ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED (# SPACES)27 COVERAGE MINIMUM LOT SIZE N/A MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 85% PROVIDED BUILDING COVERAGE 12.3% MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 85% PROVIDED SITE COVERAGE 35.6% MAXIMUM MAX FAR 85% PROVIDED SITE COVERAGE 24.6% FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BUILDING AREAS BUILDING #SIZE HEIGHT (TOP OF BUILDING) HEIGHT (TOP OF EQUIPMENT) BUILDING 1 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BUILDING 2 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BUILDING 3 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BUILDING 4 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BUILDING 5 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BUILDING 6 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BUILDING 7 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BUILDING 8 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BUILDING 9 152,000 SF 55'-0"70'-0" TOTAL 2,451,200 SF N/A N/A EMERGENCY ENTRANCE PRIMARY ENTRANCE 19 EXHIBIT C Amended PUD Plan (Attached) PRIMARY ENTRANCE BEECHER ROADELDAMAIN ROADRAILRO A D BUILDING 8 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=647.0 BUILDING 9 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=647.0 BUILDING 6 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=647.5 POND 6 BUILDING 3 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=648.5 BUILDING 2 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=649.0 BUILDING 4 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=648.5 BUILDING 1 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=649.0 BUILDING 5 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=648.0 POND 5POND 2 POND 1 POND 4 POND 3 SUBSTATION (436' X 920') FFE=±648.5 530.6'30.0'±233.6' 30.0' 75.0'275.4'925.0'436.0'30.0'221.3'M-2 ZONING 30' WATER LINE EASEMENT 150' SETBACK EASEMENT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT A-1 ZONING 50' SETBACK EASEMENT 50' SETBACK EASEMENT A-1 ZONING A-1 ZONING 30' WATER LINE EASEMENT 50' SETBACK EASEMENT 50' SETBACK EASEMENT 30' WATER LINE EASEMENT EMERGENCY ENTRANCE 150' PROPOSED FUTURE EASEMENT 50' SETBACK EASEMENT © COPYRIGHT 2025SHEET PEG JOB No.PEG PMSTART DATESCALEPINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP PINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP www.pinnacle-engr.comCHICAGO OFFICE: 1051 E. MAIN ST. | SUITE 217 EAST DUNDEE, IL 60118 (847) 551-5300 ENGINEERING I NATURAL RESOURCES I SURVEYING PLAN I DESIGN I DELIVER CHICAGO I MILWAUKEE : NATIONWIDE w w w .p i n n a c l e -e n g r .c o m REVISIONS IL DESIGN FIRM 184.006289-0010 PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN C1 YORKVILLE PUD (CHI 11) - PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN6097.00-ILBDJ11/21/251"=200'1 1 1" = 200'0 400' GRAPHICAL SCALE (FEET) NORTH YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS C1 YORKVILLE PUD (CHI 11) WETLANDS PROPOSED BUILDING STORMWATER POND LEGEND PROJECT AREA EQUIPMENT YARD SECURITY FENCE PREVIOUS SITE PLAN DESIGN SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA ±9,956,767.47 SF (±228.57 AC) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT N/A SETBACKS FRONT (WEST) REQUIRED 25' FRONT (WEST) PROVIDED 150' REAR (EAST) REQUIRED 0' REAR (EAST) PROVIDED 60' SIDE (NORTH & SOUTH) REQUIRED 20' SIDE (NORTH & SOUTH) PROVIDED 50' TRANSITIONAL SIDE N/A *SETBACKS APPLY ONLY TO THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PROPERTY IS RESUBDIVIDED. THERE SHALL BE NO SETBACKS APPLICABLE TO THE INTERNAL LOT LINES. PARKING DATA CENTER PARKING RATIO 0.2 SPACES PER 1,000 SF REQUIRED PARKING (# SPACES)433 PROVIDED PARKING (# SPACES)378 ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED (# SPACES)8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED (# SPACES)24 COVERAGE MINIMUM LOT SIZE N/A MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 85.0% PROVIDED BUILDING COVERAGE 10.9% MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 85.0% PROVIDED SITE COVERAGE 28.7% MAXIMUM FAR 85% PROVIDED FAR 21.7% BUILDING DATA BLDG #SIZE HEIGHT (TOP OF BLDG) HEIGHT (TOP OF EQPT.) BLDG 1 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 2 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 3 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 4 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 5 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 6 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 7 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 8 287,400 SF 55'-0"70'-0" BLDG 9 152,000 SF 55'-0"70'-0" TOTAL 2,163,800 SF N/A N/A 20 EXHIBIT D CHI 11 PUD Plan (Attached) 12' 30' 30' 12' 12' 30' 12' 18'30'30' 12' 30'30' 18' 18' 30'30'12'ELDAMAIN ROADBNSF R A I L W A Y C O M P A N Y FAXON ROAD BEECHER ROADPROPOSED BLDG 11A FF = 659.20 PROPOSED BLDG 11B FF = 658.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11C FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11D FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11E FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11F FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11G FF = 651.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11H FF = 650.7030'12'30'12'30'12'12'30'12'30'12'30'12'30'30'30'12'30' 12' 30' 12' 30'30' 18' 18' 30' STORMWATER BASIN 1 STORMWATER BASIN 2 STORM WATER BASIN 3 STORMWATER BASIN 4 STORMWATER BASIN 7 STORMWATER BASIN 6 STORMWATER BASIN 550' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK SECURITY FENCE (TYP.) 20' UTILITY EASEMENT 60' BUILDING SETBACK 40' R.O.W. DEDICATION 20' UTILITY EASEMENT 150' BUILDING SETBACK 75' R.O.W. DEDICATION 25' UTILITY & PEDESTRIAN PATH EASEMENT 50' BUILDING SETBACK 150' UTILITY EASEMENT 60' R.O.W. DEDICATION PROPOSED GATED RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT ONLY EMERGENCY ACCESS ELDAMAIN RD CENTERLINE 100' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 100' LANDSCAPE BUFFER OPEN SPACE / UTILITY EASEMENT BEECHER ROAD CENTERLINE 100' LANDSCAPE BUFFER SECURITY FENCE (TYP.) PROPOSED FULL ACCESS SECURITY FENCE GATED FULL ACCESS (NO TRUCK TRAFFIC & RESTRICTED EMPLOYEE EGRESS ONLY)© COPYRIGHT 2026SHEET PEG JOB No.PEG PMSTART DATESCALEPINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP PINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP www.pinnacle-engr.comCHICAGO OFFICE: 1051 E. MAIN ST. | SUITE 217 EAST DUNDEE, IL 60118 (847) 551-5300 ENGINEERING I NATURAL RESOURCES I SURVEYING PLAN I DESIGN I DELIVER CHICAGO I MILWAUKEE : NATIONWIDE w w w .p i n n a c l e -e n g r .c o m REVISIONS IL DESIGN FIRM 184.006289-0010 MAJOR CHANGE & PRELIMINARY PUD FOR C1 YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS1411.40-ILDAT05/14/261" = 200'1 1YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 1" = 200'0 400' GRAPHICAL SCALE (FEET) NORTH CHI 11 COMPLEX SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA ±9,972,190.80 SF (±228.93 AC) BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (WEST) REAR (EAST) SIDE (NORTH & SOUTH) TRANSITIONAL SIDE *SETBACKS APPLY ONLY TO THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PROPERTY IS RESUBDIVIDED. THERE SHALL BE NO SETBACKS APPLICABLE TO THE INTERNAL LOT LINES. BUILDING DATA BLDG #SIZE*PARKING REQUIRED PARKING PROVIDED ** LOADING BERTH PROVIDED HEIGHT (TOP OF BLDG) HEIGHT (TOP OF EQPT. SCREENING WALL) BLDG A 246,387 SF 50 50 4 36'-0"50'-10" BLDG B 129,350 SF 26 50 2 36'-0"50'-10" BLDG C 246,387 SF 50 50 4 36'-0"50'-10" BLDG D 246,387 SF 50 38 4 36'-0"50'-10" BLDG E 246,387 SF 50 50 4 36'-0"50'-10" BLDG F 246,387 SF 50 38 4 36'-0"50'-10" BLDG G 246,387 SF 50 49 4 36'-0"50'-10" BLDG H 246,387 SF 50 54 4 36'-0"50'-10" TOTAL 1,854,805 SF 376 379 30 N/A N/A *INCLUDES 16,673 SF OF 2ND FLOOR OFFICE SPACE ** 1 ADA STALL PROVIDED PER BUILDING PARKING DATA DATA CENTER PARKING RATIO 0.2 SPACES PER 1,000 SF REQUIRED PARKING (# SPACES)376 PROVIDED PARKING (# SPACES)379 ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED (# SPACES)8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED (# SPACES)8 COVERAGE DATA MINIMUM LOT SIZE N/A MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 85.0% PROVIDED BUILDING COVERAGE 17.3% MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 85.0% PROVIDED SITE COVERAGE 52.8% MAXIMUM FAR 85.0% PROVIDED FAR 18.6% C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS MAJOR CHANGE & PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR C1 YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS 25' 0' 20' N/A CODE 150' 60' 50' N/A PROVIDED RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS 500' (MINIMUM)VARIES (±600' - ±833') *INTERIOR SETBACKS (IN THE EVENT OF A SUBDIVISION)SAME AS ABOVE 0' 12' 30' 30' 12' 12' 30' 12' 18'30'30' 12' 30'30' 18' 18' 30'30'12'ELDAMAIN ROADBNSF R A I L W A Y C O M P A N Y FAXON ROAD BEECHER ROADPROPOSED BLDG 11A FF = 659.20 PROPOSED BLDG 11B FF = 658.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11C FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11D FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11E FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11F FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11G FF = 651.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11H FF = 650.7030'12'30'12'30'12'12'30'12'30'12'30'12'30'30'30'12'30' 12' 30' 12' 30'30' 18' 18' 30' STORMWATER BASIN 1 STORMWATER BASIN 2 STORM WATER BASIN 3 STORMWATER BASIN 4 STORMWATER BASIN 7 STORMWATER BASIN 6 STORMWATER BASIN 550' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK SECURITY FENCE (TYP.) 20' UTILITY EASEMENT 60' BUILDING SETBACK 40' R.O.W. DEDICATION 20' UTILITY EASEMENT 150' BUILDING SETBACK 75' R.O.W. DEDICATION 25' UTILITY & PEDESTRIAN PATH EASEMENT 50' BUILDING SETBACK 150' UTILITY EASEMENT 60' R.O.W. DEDICATION PROPOSED GATED RIGHT-IN / RIGHT-OUT ONLY EMERGENCY ACCESS ELDAMAIN RD CENTERLINE 100' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 100' LANDSCAPE BUFFER OPEN SPACE / UTILITY EASEMENT BEECHER ROAD CENTERLINE 100' LANDSCAPE BUFFER SECURITY FENCE (TYP.) PROPOSED FULL ACCESS SECURITY FENCE GATED FULL ACCESS (NO TRUCK TRAFFIC & RESTRICTED EMPLOYEE EGRESS ONLY)© COPYRIGHT 2026SHEET PEG JOB No.PEG PMSTART DATESCALEPINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP PINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP www.pinnacle-engr.comCHICAGO OFFICE: 1051 E. MAIN ST. | SUITE 217 EAST DUNDEE, IL 60118 (847) 551-5300 ENGINEERING I NATURAL RESOURCES I SURVEYING PLAN I DESIGN I DELIVER CHICAGO I MILWAUKEE : NATIONWIDE w w w .p i n n a c l e -e n g r .c o m REVISIONS IL DESIGN FIRM 184.006289-0010 MAJOR CHANGE & PRELIMINARY PUD FOR C1 YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS1411.40-ILDAT05/14/261" = 200'1 1YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 1" = 200'0 400' GRAPHICAL SCALE (FEET) NORTH CHI 11 COMPLEX SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA ±9,972,190.80 SF (±228.93 AC) BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT (WEST) REAR (EAST) SIDE (NORTH & SOUTH) TRANSITIONAL SIDE *SETBACKS APPLY ONLY TO THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PROPERTY IS RESUBDIVIDED. THERE SHALL BE NO SETBACKS APPLICABLE TO THE INTERNAL LOT LINES. BUILDING DATA BLDG #SIZE*PARKING REQUIRED PARKING PROVIDED ** LOADING BERTH PROVIDED HEIGHT (TOP OF BLDG) HEIGHT (TOP OF EQPT. SCREENING WALL) BLDG A 246,387 SF 50 50 4 36'-0"50'-10" BLDG B 129,350 SF 26 50 2 36'-0"50'-10" BLDG C 246,387 SF 50 50 4 36'-0"50'-10" BLDG D 246,387 SF 50 38 4 36'-0"50'-10" BLDG E 246,387 SF 50 50 4 36'-0"50'-10" BLDG F 246,387 SF 50 38 4 36'-0"50'-10" BLDG G 246,387 SF 50 49 4 36'-0"50'-10" BLDG H 246,387 SF 50 54 4 36'-0"50'-10" TOTAL 1,854,805 SF 376 379 30 N/A N/A *INCLUDES 16,673 SF OF 2ND FLOOR OFFICE SPACE ** 1 ADA STALL PROVIDED PER BUILDING PARKING DATA DATA CENTER PARKING RATIO 0.2 SPACES PER 1,000 SF REQUIRED PARKING (# SPACES)376 PROVIDED PARKING (# SPACES)379 ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED (# SPACES)8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED (# SPACES)8 COVERAGE DATA MINIMUM LOT SIZE N/A MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 85.0% PROVIDED BUILDING COVERAGE 17.3% MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 85.0% PROVIDED SITE COVERAGE 52.8% MAXIMUM FAR 85.0% PROVIDED FAR 18.6% C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS MAJOR CHANGE & PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR C1 YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS 25' 0' 20' N/A CODE 150' 60' 50' N/A PROVIDED RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS 500' (MINIMUM)VARIES (±600' - ±833') *INTERIOR SETBACKS (IN THE EVENT OF A SUBDIVISION)SAME AS ABOVE 0' © COPYRIGHT 2025SHEET PEG JOB No.PEG PMSTART DATESCALEPINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP PINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP www.pinnacle-engr.comCHICAGO OFFICE: 1051 E. MAIN ST. | SUITE 217 EAST DUNDEE, IL 60118 (847) 551-5300 ENGINEERING I NATURAL RESOURCES I SURVEYING PLAN I DESIGN I DELIVER CHICAGO I MILWAUKEE : NATIONWIDE w w w .p i n n a c l e -e n g r .c o m REVISIONS IL DESIGN FIRM 184.006289-0010 CHI 11 LANDSCAPE DESIGN COLOR EXHIBIT C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS - CHI 11 LANDSCAPE DESIGN COLOR EXHIBIT6097.00-ILBDJ05/14/261"=200'1 1YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 1" = 200'0 400' GRAPHICAL SCALE (FEET) NORTH AMERISTAR IMPASSE II - SECURITY FENCE CANOPY TREE UNDERSTORY TREES EVERGREEN TREE C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS © COPYRIGHT 2025SHEET PEG JOB No.PEG PMSTART DATESCALEwww.pinnacle-engr.comREVISIONS COLOR BUILDING RENDERING C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS - COLOR BUILDING RENDERING6097.00-ILBDJ05/14/26NONE1 1 C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS © COPYRIGHT 2025SHEET PEG JOB No.PEG PMSTART DATESCALEwww.pinnacle-engr.comREVISIONS EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS A & B C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS - EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS A & B6097.00-ILBDJ05/14/261/16" = 1'-0"1 3 0'4'8'16'2' YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS © COPYRIGHT 2025SHEET PEG JOB No.PEG PMSTART DATESCALEwww.pinnacle-engr.comREVISIONS EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATION C C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS - EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATION C6097.00-ILBDJ05/14/261/16" = 1'-0"2 3 0'4'8'16'2' YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS © COPYRIGHT 2025SHEET PEG JOB No.PEG PMSTART DATESCALEwww.pinnacle-engr.comREVISIONS EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATION D C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS - EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATION D6097.00-ILBDJ05/14/261/16" = 1'-0"3 3YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 0'4'8'16'2' C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS ELDAMAIN ROADBNSF R A I L W A Y C O M P A N Y FAXON ROAD BEECHER ROADSTORMWATER BASIN 1 STORMWATER BASIN 2 STORM WATER BASIN 3 STORMWATER BASIN 4 STORMWATER BASIN 7 STORMWATER BASIN 6 STORMWATER BASIN 5SUBSTATION © COPYRIGHT 2026SHEET PEG JOB No.PEG PMSTART DATESCALEPINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP PINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP www.pinnacle-engr.comCHICAGO OFFICE: 1051 E. MAIN ST. | SUITE 217 EAST DUNDEE, IL 60118 (847) 551-5300 ENGINEERING I NATURAL RESOURCES I SURVEYING PLAN I DESIGN I DELIVER CHICAGO I MILWAUKEE : NATIONWIDE w w w .p i n n a c l e -e n g r .c o m REVISIONS IL DESIGN FIRM 184.006289-0010 CHI 11 INFASTRUCTURE PHASING PLAN C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS - CHI 11 INFASTRUCTURE PHASING PLAN6097.00-ILDAT05/14/261"=200' 1 1YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 1" = 200'0 400' GRAPHICAL SCALE (FEET) NORTH C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS PROPOSED PHASING SCHEDULE PHASE STORMWATER POND(S) SERVING PHASE ANCILLARY INFRASTRUCTURE *1 SUBSTATION BASIN 5 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO & CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTATION 2 PHASING LIMITS ARE ESTIMATED AND MAY BE COMBINED AND / OR BUILDING PHASES MAY BE REVISED BASED UPON TENANT DEMAND. IN ALL CASES, ALL NECESSARY INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVICE A BUILDING, CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY CODE, WILL BE COMPLETED WITH THAT BUILDING OR PHASE 3 PHASING LIMITS ARE ESTIMATED AND MAY BE COMBINED AND / OR BUILDING PHASES MAY BE REVISED BASED UPON TENANT DEMAND. IN ALL CASES, ALL NECESSARY INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVICE A BUILDING, CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY CODE, WILL BE COMPLETED WITH THAT BUILDING OR PHASE *PHASE 1 COMMENCED, Q1 OF 2026 AND IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION ELDAMAIN ROADBNSF R A I L W A Y C O M P A N Y FAXON ROAD BEECHER ROADPROPOSED BLDG 11A FF = 659.20 PROPOSED BLDG 11B FF = 658.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11C FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11D FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11E FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11F FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11G FF = 651.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11H FF = 650.70 STORMWATER BASIN 1 STORMWATER BASIN 2 STORM WATER BASIN 3 STORMWATER BASIN 4 STORMWATER BASIN 7 STORMWATER BASIN 6 STORMWATER BASIN 5±543'±435'BUILDING 8 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=647.0 BUILDING 9 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=647.0 BUILDING 6 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=647.5 BUILDING 3 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=648.5 BUILDING 2 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=649.0 BUILDING 4 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=648.5 BUILDING 1 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=649.0 BUILDING 5 2 STORY DATA CENTER FFE=648.0 SUBSTATION (436' X 920') FFE=±648.5 ±732'±833'© COPYRIGHT 2025SHEET PEG JOB No.PEG PMSTART DATESCALEPINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP PINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP www.pinnacle-engr.comCHICAGO OFFICE: 1051 E. MAIN ST. | SUITE 217 EAST DUNDEE, IL 60118 (847) 551-5300 ENGINEERING I NATURAL RESOURCES I SURVEYING PLAN I DESIGN I DELIVER CHICAGO I MILWAUKEE : NATIONWIDE w w w .p i n n a c l e -e n g r .c o m REVISIONS IL DESIGN FIRM 184.006289-0010 RESIDENTIAL SETBACK COMPARISON EXHIBIT C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS - RESIDENTIAL SETBACK COMPARISON EXHIBIT6097.00-ILBDJ05/14/261"=200'1 1YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 1" = 200'0 400' GRAPHICAL SCALE (FEET) NORTH C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CHI 11 CAMPUS 1 Memorandum To: Plan Council From: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Date: May 6, 2026 Subject: PZC 2026-03 C1 Yorkville – CHI 11 (Cyrus One) Data Center NE Corner of Faxon Road & Eldamain Road Proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment & Preliminary PUD Plan I have reviewed the applications for Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment and Preliminary PUD Plan received April 21, 2026 as submitted by C1 Yorkville, LLC, Petitioner, as well as the following supplemental documents/plans: 1.Project Narrative (Petition for Development Approval) prepared and submitted by Rosanova & Whitaker, Ltd., attorney, on behalf of C1 Yorkville, LLC, petitioner. Revised and resubmitted. 2.Concept PUD Plan, prepared by Pinnacle Engineering Group and dated 03/12/26. Revised and resubmitted. 3.Major Change & Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plan, prepared by Pinnacle Engineering Group and dated 03/12/26. Revised and resubmitted. 4.Final Plat of Subdivision, prepared by Pinnacle Engineering Group and dated 3/13/2026. Omitted. Petitioner has withdrawn request for the Final Plat of Subdivision. 5.Color Building Rendering and Exterior Elevations, prepared by Corgan and dated 03/12/26. Revised and resubmitted. 6.Noise Study, prepared by Trinity Consultants and dated April 22, 2026. Pending. 7.Data Center Impact Analysis – An Assessment of Potential Electric System Reliability and Cost Impacts of a Proposed Data Center in Yorkville, prepared by The Power Bureau, LLC dated 2026. Pending 8.The Fiscal Benefits of the Proposed CyrusOne C1 Data Center Development in Yorkville, prepared by Gruen Gruen + Associates and dated March 2026. Pending. 9.The Economic Impacts of the Proposed CyrusOne C1 Data Center Development in Yorkville, prepared by Gruen Gruen + Associates and dated February 2026. No changes necessary. 10.Traffic Impact Study Proposed Data Center, prepared by KLOA and dated March 24, 2026. Pending. The petitioner is seeking approval to amend existing ordinances (Ord. 2024-33 approving a special use Planned Unit Development and Ord. 2026-09 Minor Amendment to the Approved Planned Unit Development) for Major Planned Unit Development Amendment and Preliminary PUD Plan to construct a secured data center campus and on-site substation on approximately 228- acres of land located at the northeast corner of Faxon Road and Eldamain Road, also known as CyrusOne’s CHI-11 campus. The site will consist of eight (8) one-story standalone buildings with a total building area of up to 2,163,800 square feet to be developed in phases over a 10-20 year period. Petitioner notes that the data center campus is already under construction, with Petitioner currently constructing the primary access to the facility PETITIONER RESPONSES TO STAFF COMMENTS ARE IN BOLD AND UNDERLINED (HIGHLIGHTED BY STAFF) 2 and the electrical substation that will support data center campus. Petitioner anticipates commencing construction of the first building of the campus before the end of the 4th quarter of 2026. With the revised plans submitted herewith, Petitioner has reduced the total square footage of the campus to 1,854,805 square feet. Based upon my review of the applications, supplemental documents, and concept PUD a preliminary PUD site plans, I have compiled the following comments: GENERAL PUD MAJOR AMENDMENT COMMENTS: The previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement for the C1 Yorkville (CHI-11) CyrusOne data center campus (Ordinance 2024-33) was established prior to the City’s adoption of Energy Industrial Use standards for data centers via Ordinance 2025-53 in June 2025. Sections 2.1 and 4.3 of the previously approved PUD Agreement permit the waiver of subsequently adopted, more stringent Energy Industrial Use regulations, effectively vesting the development standards within the current agreement for a period of 20 years. The original PUD Agreement established the following: 1.CURRENT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) – Section 10-8-8 of City’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) establishes standards for Planned Unit Development (PUDs). PUDs are allowed to modify standards of the base district as long as the requested modifications are specifically identified and demonstrates how each allowance is compatible with surrounding development, is necessary for proper development of the site, and is aligned with at least one (1) modification standard found in Section 10-8-8D of the UDO. a.Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement (Ordinance 2024-33) approved certain deviations from the base M-2 General Manufacturing District standards for the subject property related to: building setbacks for interior lots, parking requirements, vehicular cross access, pedestrian circulation, off-street loading, landscape requirements internal to the site, certain mechanical screening requirements (subject to sound study approval), street design for lots, and appearance standards. b.Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement (Ordinance 2024-33) established modification standard #12 “Regional Utility Improvements” applies to the subject property, as the proposed development will extend public utilities (water and sanitary) to and through the property resulting in recapturable payments to the developer when future property owners in the area benefit from connecting to such utility that had not previously existed. 2.PROPOSED MAJOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT - Section 7.1 of the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement established the criteria for major amendments which results in one or more of the following changes to the approved Preliminary PUD Plan: a.More than 10% increase in square footage of the buildings. i.Proposed plan illustrates a decrease in the total building square footage of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan from 2,163,800 to 2,062,500 on the Major PUD Preliminary Plan but seeks an allowance to maintain the previously approved maximum building square footage. NOT APPLICABLE. As reflected in the revised plans submitted herewith, Petitioner has revised its request with respect to square footage for the campus. Petitioner is requesting approval of 1,854,805 square feet, which reflects a decrease in buildable area of approximately 310,000 square feet. b.Any structure greater than 100 feet in height. i.Proposed plan decreases the maximum height of the data center buildings on the Minor PUD Preliminary Plan from a maximum of 70’-0” to top of equipment to 50’-10” to top of equipment screening wall on the Major PUD Preliminary Plan. NOT APPLICABLE. 3 c.Except as other set forth above, any deviation from the site data standards set forth on the Site Plan. i.It is noted that the provided parking spaces increased from 378 stalls on the Site Data Standards of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to 437 stalls on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan. APPLICABLE. With the aforementioned reduction in square footage the parking calculations have been updated. A total of 376 parking spaces are required pursuant to the approved planned unit development and Petitioner proposes to construct a total of 379 parking spaces. The proposed parking is consistent with the approved PUD Plan. ii.It is noted that the provided building coverage increased from 10.9% on the Site Data Standards of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to 18.6% on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan. APPLICABLE. Building Coverage has increased with the change from 2-story to 1-story buildings. The Building Coverage approved with the Original PUD in 2024 was 12.3%. With the 2026 Minor Change, an entire building was eliminated, which resulted in reduction of the Building Coverage to 10.9%. With the square footage reflected in the Major Change now proposed by Petitioner, Building Coverage will be increased to 17.3%. While Building Coverage is increased, we believe the sum of the changes associated with the increased Building Coverage (i.e. reduction in height and increased setbacks) will be a net positive to the surrounding community. iii.It is noted that the provided site coverage increased from 28.7% on the Site Data Standards of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to 50.3% on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan. APPLICABLE. Like Building Coverage, Site Coverage has increased with the change from 2- story to 1-story buildings. The Site Coverage approved with the Original PUD in 2024 was 35.6%. With the 2026 Minor Change, Site Coverage was reduced to 28.7% as a result of a building being eliminated. With the single-story buildings proposed with the Major Change, Site Coverage has increased to 52.8%. While this is a significant increase in Site Coverage, the proposed Site Coverage remains well below the 85% Site Coverage permitted under the City’s Code. Moreover, Petitioner has largely maintained perimeter open space, which is how the community will perceive the data center campus. Given the gated nature of the campus, most residents will never perceive the increase to Site Coverage that is occurring within the fenced portion of the campus. d.Any deviation from applicable provisions of the UDO. i.In addition to the criteria set forth above, Section 7.1 of the approved Planned Unit Development agreement also references major amendment criteria established in Section 10-8-8(G)(2) of the UDO as binding, which is as follows: 1.Increase density. NOT APPLICABLE. 2.Increase the height of buildings. NOT APPLICABLE. 3.Reduce open space by more than five (5) percent. APPLICABLE. a.Building coverage increased 7.7% from 10.9% on the Site Data Standards of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to 18.6% on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan. As noted above, Petitioner proposes to increase Building Coverage to 17.3% with the change to single-story buildings. Petitioner believes that the benefits associated 4 with the reduced building height and the increase in setbacks to nearby residential properties outweigh any perceived impact associated with the increased Building Coverage. b. Site coverage increased 21.6% from 28.7% on the Site Data Standards of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to 50.3% on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan. APPLICABLE. As noted above, Site Coverage has increased to 52.8% with the proposed Major Change. Given the nature of the data center campus and Petitioner’s effort to maximize perimeter open space, this change will be imperceptible to the general public who will perceive the campus while driving along Eldamain, Faxon or Beecher Road. 4. Modify the proportion of housing types. NOT APPLICABLE. 5. Change parking areas in a manner that is inconsistent with this UDO. NOT APPLICABLE. 6. Increase the approved gross floor area by more than five hundred (500) square feet. NOT APPLICABLE. 7. Alter alignment of roads, utilities, or drainage. APPLICABLE. a. Proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan illustrates significant changes to the site access and road alignments off of Eldamain Road, a new access off of Beecher Road, and reconfigurations to onsite stormwater management basins. As discussed during Plan Council, Petitioner is working with Kendall County DOT regarding the restricted emergency access along Eldamain Road. Petitioner believes that the secondary access to Beecher Road will be beneficial to the overall function of the campus. 8. Result in any other change inconsistent with any standard or condition imposed by the City Council in approving the Planned Unit Development and/or the approved Site Plan, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. NOT APPLICABLE. 3. ZONING - The subject property consists of seven (7) parcels (#02-18-300-004, #02-19-100- 004, #02-19-100-005, #02-18-300-003, #02-18-300-001, #02-18-300-002, and #02-18-400- 004) and is zoned M-2 GENERAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT. The following are the most current immediate surrounding zoning and land uses based on recent development approvals: Zoning Land Use North A-1 (Kendall County) ComEd Substation/Transfer Station - Utility Use South A-1 (Kendall County) BNSF Railroad Agricultural, Residential and Business Uses Transportation Land Use East A-1 SU (Kendall County) A-1 SU (Yorkville) Agriculture/Former Residence (Owned by Petitioner) Solar Farm West Eldamain Road M-2 General Manufacturing (Plano) A-1 (Kendall County) Transportation Land Use Menards Distribution Center Residential/Farm 4. ENERGY INDUSTRIAL USE STANDARDS –Data centers are defined as Energy Industrial 5 Uses per Table 10-3-12(B) in the Unified Development Ordinance. While the previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement provides for the waiver of subsequently adopted Energy Industrial Use standards from applying to the subject property, staff has identified and outlined the provisions contained in Section 10-4-10 of the UDO, as adopted in June 2025, and offers the following relevant comments: i. LANDSCAPE BUFFER - Section 10-4-10(A)(1) of the UDO requires data center developments to maintain a minimum 100-foot landscape buffer when adjacent to non-manufacturing land uses, inclusive of an 8-foot tall berm when adjacent to residential and dedicated exclusively for dense landscaping including trees and shrubs but not utilized for stormwater detention, roadways, walking trails or surface parking. Additionally, a minimum 100-foot landscape buffer is required when a data center is adjacent to a public roadway and shall consist of a Transition Zone D landscape buffer. 1. The proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan illustrates a 100’ wide landscape buffer along Eldamain Road and Beecher Road. It appears there is a 50’ wide landscape buffer along a portion of the north property line adjacent to the Commonwealth Edison parcel and a varying depth landscape buffer of 50’-100’ wide along the southern property line. a. Due to the presence of two (2) existing residential land uses to the south on Faxon Road, staff recommends a minimum 8- foot tall berm be installed along this portion of the campus. Please note that Petitioner is under contract to acquire one of the two residential properties located to the south along Faxon Road. The other “residential properties” does contain a single-family home, but there is also significant commercial activity associated with the operation of this property. While Petitioner can accommodate an 8’ berm to the south along Faxon Road, we question whether the berm is desirable given the substantial open space and landscape buffering that has been programmed along Faxon Road. Petitioner has specifically reached out to the adjacent property owner to discuss potential resolution of this issue. If a berm is ultimately preferred, Petitioner notes that the berm cannot be continuous as there is a portion of the Faxon Road ROW that drains overland to the north. Positive overland flow is required to prevent possible ponding water in the northern ROW of Faxon Road. b. The Landscape Plan indicates the security fencing will be located in front of the 100’ landscape buffer along the south property line adjacent to Faxon Road. However, the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan indicates the security fencing will be located behind Stormwater Basin #7. Please reconcile the plans accordingly. The landscape plan has been revised to reflect the location of the fence north of the stormwater detention basin and generally inside of the perimeter landscape buffers. The location of the fence is part of Petitioner’s efforts to maximize the impact of perimeter open spaces. c. The Parks & Recreation Department has inquired about the petitioner providing a trail easement along the Beecher Road and Eldamain Road frontages of the subject property. Based on follow-up discussion with the City Engineer, it is our 6 understanding that the Beecher Road right-of-way is sufficient to accommodate the desired trail section. Along Eldamain Road, Petitioner can accommodate a 30’ easement to the east and adjacent to the City’s 20’ utility easement. Provided that the City will own and maintain the trail, Petitioner has no objection to maintaining landscape within this area. d. Staff defers to the Landscape Reviewer for additional comments. 2. BUILDING SEPARATION – Section 10-4-10(A)(3) of the UDO requires a minimum of a 500-foot building separation from the nearest data center building or structure (primary or accessory) to the nearest residential or commercial structure. a. While the Site Data table on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan indicates “No Building within 500’ of existing residence”, staff recommends the plan be revised to provide dimensioned distances of the nearest data center building(s) to residential properties along Faxon Road and the two (2) unincorporated residential parcels along the west side of Eldamain Road (PINs #01-24-200- 001 and #01-13-400- 004). One of Petitioner’s goals with the Major change was to maximize setbacks to adjacent residential properties. To reflect the increase in setbacks, we have submitted a “Residential Comparison Setback Exhibit” which measures dimensions from existing residential structures to the nearest corner of Petitioner’s proposed data center building. With the Major Change, setbacks to residential structures have increased from 543’ to 732’ in one instance and from 485’ to 833’ in the other location. As noted above, Petitioner is the contract purchaser of the westernmost residential structure along Faxon Road, so we’ve omitted measurements to that structure. 3. OPERATIONAL TESTING – Section 10-4-10(A)(6) of the UDO requires operational testing of emergency backup generators be limited to between the hours of 11am to 5pm on weekdays only, non- holidays. a. Staff will require written confirmation from the petitioner acknowledging this standard as part of the amended Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement. Noted. 4. NUCLEAR ENERGY – Section 10-4-10(A)(7) of the UDO strictly prohibits data centers from using, generating, storing, or deploying nuclear energy as a power source within the City. This includes, but is not limited to, nuclear reactors, small modular reactors (SMRs), or any other nuclear-based energy. a. Staff will require written confirmation from the petitioner acknowledging this standard as part of the amended Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement. Noted. 5. PHASING PLAN - Section 10-4-10(A)(8) of the UDO requires the implementation of a phased construction plan that minimizes impacts on residential structures by prioritizing initial development at the farthest distance from existing residential structures. 7 a. The previously approved Preliminary PUD Plan included a nine (9) phased development plan with each phase consisting of one (1) building and associated stormwater basin. While there is no illustrated phasing plan on the proposed Major Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan, it is noted in the petition that construction is planned to begin with Building 11A (northwest quadrant) this fall with an anticipated tenant occupancy by the end of Q1 2028. i. Staff recommends a formal phasing exhibit be provided as an exhibit to the proposed Major Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan. A Phasing Plan has been submitted with the revised plans. As reflected in the Phasing Plan, Phase 1 construction commenced earlier this year with construction of site access from Eldamain Road and the on-site substation. Phases 2 and 3 will include the mass grading and stormwater management for all of the buildings within the respective phase. Individual buildings within a phase, which will take approximately 18 months to construct, will be staged one after another. Utilities and site access will be extended, as necessary, with each building constructed. Petitioner cannot presently commit to the order in which buildings within a phase will be constructed. 6. FENCING - Section 10-4-10(A)(9) of the UDO requires fencing be constructed of security style aluminum, steel, wrought iron, or similar materials. Chain-link or barbed wire fencing is prohibited along public facing edges and properties adjacent to residential land uses. a. Petitioner has provided an image of the proposed high security steel fencing on the Landscape Plan. Staff requests the petitioner verify the height of the proposed fencing. The proposed fence is 8’ tall, consistent with the Original PUD approved in 2024. 7. LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - Section 10-4- 10(A)(10) of the UDO requires lighting and photometric plans must be submitted at the time of application and adhere to the City’s outside lighting standards. a. Per the previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement, the developer agrees to submit to the City for its approval a photometric plan with manufacturers cut sheets of the proposed lighting standards to be installed in the parking area of the subject property. The photometric plan is to be provided with an application for final plat of at such time the Developer submits for a building permit. i. Since the petitioner has provided in the packet materials a Final Plat of Subdivision (although no application was filed for approval) and the petitioner has indicated they intend to seek a building permit this fall, staff recommends the submittal of a photometric plan as part of this request for Major PUD Preliminary Plan Amendment. The 8 petitioner has elected to withdraw the Final Plat of Subdivision at this time and therefore the submittal of a photometric plan would not be required. These documents will be submitted, along with the required application, at a later date when the developer submits for a building permit. 8. TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN - Section 10-4-10(A)(11) of the UDO requires a Traffic Management Plan be provided during construction, including a communication strategy and an on-site point of contact during construction. a. Staff recommends the petitioner provide a Traffic Management Plan as part of the building permitting process. Noted. 9. BATTERY STORAGE – Section 10-4-10(A)(12) of the UDO requires battery storage systems shall be located a minimum of 50 feet away from any adjacent structure and must be readily accessible by Bristol Kendal Fire Protection District (BKFD) for firefighting efforts. a. Is the petitioner proposing any battery storage systems on site? If so, staff requests additional information on location and specifications. No utility scale battery energy storage is proposed. 10. EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN - Section 10-4-10(A)(13) of the UDO requires an Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) be submitted and approved by the City and the Bristol Kendal Fire Protection District (BKFD) prior to issuance of a building permit and must include: a. Procedures for fire suppression, hazardous material spills, evacuation, and communication in case of an incident. b. The location of any battery storage systems. c. Training sessions/drills and or walkthroughs with fire and police shall be required prior to occupancy permit. d. Designated contacts for emergency services and a plan to broadcast information if an incident could affect the public. e. Must work with KenCom emergency managers to be part of text or siren alert systems. a. Staff will require written confirmation from the petitioner acknowledging this standard as part of the amended Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement. Noted. 11. BUILDING CODE ENHANCED STANDARDS - Section 10-4- 10(A)(14) of the UDO requires installing advanced early fire detection in server rooms, using fire-resistive construction beyond code minimums on walls facing neighborhoods, or providing additional hazardous material safeguards. Compliance with National Fire Protection Association 855 is also required. a. Staff will require written confirmation from the petitioner acknowledging this standard as part of the amended Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement. Noted. PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN COMMENTS: 5. MAJOR PUD AMENDMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN – Below is a summary site data table comparing the originally approved Preliminary PUD Plan, the recently approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan amendment, and the currently proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan amendment: Changes reflected in the revised plans for the Major Change are reflected in BOLD in the chart below. Originally Approved Preliminary PUD Plan Recently Approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan Proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan % Change from Minor PUD Preliminary Plan Number of Buildings 9 8 8 N/A Size of Buildings 152,000 – 287,400 sq. ft. 152,000 – 287,400 sq. ft. 129,350 – 246,387 sq. ft. -14.9% -14.3% Total Building Area 2,451,200 sq. ft. 2,163,800 sq. ft. 1,854,805 N/A Number of Stories 2 2 1 -50% Height of Buildings 55’ (top of building) 70’ (top of equipment) 55’ (top of building) 70’ (top of equipment) 36’ (top of building) 50’-10” (top of equipment) -34.5% -27.4% Number of Parking Spaces 432 378 379 .26% Percent Building Coverage 12.3% 10.9% 17.3% +58.7% Percent Site Coverage 35.6% 28.7% 52.75% +83.8% Number of Site Access Drives 2 Eldamain Rd (Primary/Single Drive) Faxon Rd (Emergency Access) 2 Eldamain Rd (Primary/Double Drive) Faxon Rd (Emergency Access) 3 Eldamain Road (Primary/Double Drive) Eldamain Road North ( Emergency Access) Beecher Road (Full Access) +50% Number of Stormwater Basins 6 6 7 +16.7% Substation Area 800’ x 1,000’ (800,000 sq. ft) 436’ x 920’ (401,120 sq. ft.) 436’ x 920’ (401,120 sq. ft.) N/A Distance of Nearest Residential Structure Undetermined 485/543 833/732 71.8% 34.8% a. As stated previously, the petitioner must provide Building Structure/Separation distances for the originally approved PUD Preliminary Plan, recently approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan, and proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan so that staff can compare previous distances to nearby residential to proposed new distances. These dimensions can be provided on the Site Plan or a separate plan exhibit. See enclosed Residential Setback Comparison Exhibit. b. Staff further recommends that the petitioner provide an additional Site Plan depicting the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan overlaid with the recently approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to serve as a visual comparison of the proposed changes and supplement the above table. See enclosed Residential Setback Comparison Exhibit. 6.PARKING - According to the previously approved Preliminary PUD Plan as part of the Minor PUD Amendment, there were 378 total parking spaces provided. Additionally, the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement stated in Section 2.4 that the parking ratio shall be 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet of net floor area, but in case shall be less than 400 parking spaces, including ADA spaces. a.Per the Site Data table on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan, the total required parking for the subject property based on 2,062,500 square feet is 413 spaces, including 9 ADA accessible spaces. i.However, the petitioner is proposing to provide a total of 437 parking spaces, including 16 ADA accessible spaces, based on the potential of accommodating up to 2,163,800 square feet of building net floor area. Additionally, per Section 10-5-1K-1 of the Unified Development Ordinance, a minimum of 9 electric vehicle charging stations is required. With the revised plans, the total required parking under the PUD is 376 spaces. The New PUD site plan has been revised to provide a total of 379 spaces. In light of reductions to square footage, Petitioner does not believe that 400 parking spaces are necessary. However, if the City would like to see parking increased to 400 spaces, Petitioner can certainly accommodate that request. ADA and electrical vehicle charging spaces, as required, will be delineated with Final Engineering plans. 7.SITE ACCESS – The previously approved Preliminary PUD Plan as part of the Minor PUD Amendment had access to the site via two (2) points of access. One (1) primary entrance off of Eldamain Road and a secondary emergency access off of Faxon Road. These access points lead to internal private roadways which loop around the eight (8) data center buildings and connect to the central electric substation. i.According to the proposed Major Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan, it is noted there are still two (2) points of access. The primary access point, a double drive or “boulevard- style” looped connection, continues to be located off Eldamain Road, which is consistent with the prior approved plan. However, the secondary emergency access point is now located off of Beecher Road and eliminates the connection on Faxon Road which is directly across from existing residential lots and driveways. No changes are planned to the primary access drive via Eldamain Road. North of the primary access drive, Petitioner now plans an emergency right-in-right-out, which is being coordinated with Kendall County. In lieu of a secondary access to Faxon Road, which adjacent to existing residences, Petitioner has shifted the secondary access to Beecher Road. Petitioner proposes a full access on Beecher Road to facilitate employee ingress/egress. ii. The new proposed secondary emergency access off of Beecher Road could potentially align with a future access drive to the parcel to the east which is also currently owned by the petitioner. Petitioner believes that secondary access via Beecher Road is preferable to secondary access via Faxon Road. Access via Beecher Road minimizes conflict with adjacent residential uses and will facilitate direct access to the substation. With these changes, Petitioner proposes a full access on Beecher Road. iii. Staff defers to the City Engineer regarding site access. 8. MECHANICAL SCREENING – Per Section 10-5-4 Screening of the Unified Development Ordinance, ground/wall-mounted and roof mounted mechanical units that are visible from any public right-of-way or adjacent residential property shall be screened from public view. The previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement allowed the petitioner to deviate from this requirement by screening only the ground-mounted mechanical equipment but was not required to provide screening for any rooftop mechanical units. a. Per the petitioner’s statement, the now single-story buildings will include a mechanical penthouse incorporating an acoustic screen wall on all four (4) sides. This rooftop screening would be recessed from the primary façade of the buildings and provides a maximum height of approximately 51 feet. b. It is also noted the ground-mounted mechanical equipment in the Major PUD Preliminary Plan will no longer be screened as previously proposed with vinyl fencing equal to the height of the generator units (excluding any stacks protruding above the unit). i. It appears the proposed new screening for the ground-mounted mechanical equipment will be a solid screen wall constructed of a light- colored concrete panel approximately 18’ – 24’ tall providing full-height coverage of the exterior equipment within this “mechanical yard”. Is this accurate? Yes. ii. The petitioner is also requesting flexibility to permit areas designated as “mechanical yards” to be converted to additional building floor area in the event that ground-mounted equipment is not required. This would allow the petitioner to achieve a maximum total building area of 2,163,800 square feet across the campus. This request has been withdrawn. Petitioner seeks approval of the 1,854,805 square feet reflected on the plans. 9. APPEARANCE STANDARDS – Per Section 10-5-8-C-4 Industrial Uses, masonry products or precast concrete shall be incorporated on at least fifty (50) percent of the total building, as broken down as follows: The "front facade" (defined as that facade that faces a street that includes a main entry to the building) shall itself incorporate masonry products or precast concrete on at least fifty (50) percent of the facade. Any other facade that abuts a street shall incorporate masonry products or precast concrete. The use of masonry products or precast concrete is encouraged on the remaining facades. Where precast concrete panels or split face block is utilized, the use of colors, patterns, or other architectural features within these panels/blocks is encouraged. a. Per Section 2.11 of the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement, the petitioner was permitted to deviate from certain aspects of the Appearance Standards and required to provide prototype building elevations representative of the architectural design and building materials to be utilized. The plans illustrated exterior building elevations with materials such as concert panels, metal panels, and acoustic barrier screen walls in hues of gray and pewter. Further, the petitioner was required to provide updated elevations with any application for final plat or at time of building permit application. b. The proposed updated elevations continue to primarily feature light-colored precast concrete panels, complemented by medium and dark aluminum composite panel accents and a glass curtain wall system at the entrance. Additional design elements include prefinished metal coping and horizontal and vertical relief lines, which help break up the building mass and provide visual interest. While the buildings are now designed as single-story structures, the main entrance will feature a two-story element accommodating approximately 32,000 square feet of office space, with an overall height of 36 feet. The remainder of the data center building will have a height of 24 feet, excluding the rooftop equipment penthouse. 10. FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION – The petitioner has submitted a Final Plat of Subdivision that consolidates the existing seven (7) parcels comprising the site into a single parcel. The plat also establishes stormwater management easements granting the City perpetual access to the seven (7) proposed basins. This access ensures the City can enter the property to maintain these stormwater facilities in the event the petitioner does not fulfill its long-term maintenance obligations. a. While the petitioner has submitted a Final Plat of Subdivision as part of their application materials, a separate application for Final Plat of Subdivision approval was not provided. It is staff’s understanding that the petitioner does not wish to move forward with Final Plat approval at this time but provided the plan as an informational item. Please confirm. Confirmed. 11. SIGNAGE – Per Section 2.12 of the previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement, the petitioner was allowed to install a monument sign on Eldamain Road at the entrance of the project site in addition to a monument sign on Faxon Road. a. Per Section 10-6-6 of the Unified Development Ordinance, single tenant buildings shall be permitted a total of two (2) primary wall signs or one (1) primary wall sign per one hundred (100) linear feet of building frontage. One (1) additional wall sign shall be allowed per additional hundred (100) feet of building frontage. Only one (1) primary wall sign shall be displayed on any single building façade. b. Since the proposed Major Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan has eliminated the secondary entrance off of Faxon Road, is the petitioner still seeking to install a monument sign in this location? No. i. Is the petitioner seeking to install a secondary monument sign at the proposed new northern entrance off of Eldamain Road? No. ii. Is the petitioner seeking to install a monument sign at the proposed new entrance off of Beecher Road? Yes. 12. STUDIES a. Noise Study i. The petitioner has provided a preliminary noise study for the subject property dated April 22, 2026. It is noted that the study utilizes sound measurements taken in three (3) locations in September 2024. ii. It is noted that since that time, a 5MW solar farm was constructed on an approximately 26-acre site. This may or may not affect the baseline measurements taken in 2024. iii. It is also noted that the study references compliance with Yorkville’s Noise Ordinance as well as the Illinois Pollution Control Board noise requirements. iv. There have been previous comments related to “infra-sound” impacts, as well as vibration and sound impacts to domesticated and agricultural animals nearby. Can the petitioner’s expert provide commentary to these concerns? Yes, Petitioner will have an acoustical engineer at the public hearing. v. Staff defers to the City’s acoustical engineering consultant for comments on the findings of the study. Noted. b. Data Center Impact Analysis i. Staff notes the analysis references the project being a 960- megawatt data center. This is inconsistent with prior references to 540-megawatt center. The report has been revised. Petitioner anticipates maximum power load to be 654 MW. c. Fiscal Benefits Report i. Staff notes the report references the project being a 540- megawatt critical IT capacity data center. This is inconsistent with the reference in the Data Center Impact Analysis report. Please verify the energy capacity for the development and revise the report, if needed. The report has been updated to reflect the maximum power load anticipated by Petitioner. ii. Report references the data center campus as having 1,854,000 square feet with seven (7) buildings having 246,387 square feet and one (1) building having 129,350 square feet. The proposed preliminary PUD Plan has the total allowable building area as 2,163,800 square feet and the individual building sizes being 275,000 square feet and 137,500 square feet, respectively. Please revise report and associated tables for estimated tax revenue per building to reflect the currently proposed building areas. The Report has been updated to reflect the correct square footages as outlined herein. iii. It is noted on Table 3 Estimated Annual Electric Tax Revenue at Build- Out for Yorkville on page 9 of the report, there is a reference to the City’s Electric Tax Rate of $0.0028 per kilowatt hour based on Section 3-2-4 Municipal Utility Tax of the Yorkville City Code. 1. Section 3-2-4 was recently amended in March 2026 via Ord. 2026-26 which revised the per kilowatt hour electric rate for users in excess of 20,000,000 kilowatt hours to $0.285. The Report has been updated accordingly. iv. It is noted that this parcel is wholly within Plano School District #88. d. Economic Impacts Report i. Report references the data center campus as having 1,854,000 square feet with seven (7) buildings having 246,387 square feet and one (1) building having 129,350 square feet. The proposed preliminary PUD Plan has the total allowable building area as 2,163,800 square feet and the individual building sizes being 275,000 square feet and 137,500 square feet, respectively. Please revise report and associated tables for estimated tax revenue per building to reflect the currently proposed building areas. The PUD Plan has been revised to reflect the correct square footages as delineated herein. ii.Has the petitioner considered preparing a Real Estate Valuation Assessment evaluating the potential impact of the proposed data center campus on nearby property values, or alternatively, providing examples of property values before and after construction of comparable data center developments? Yes. Petitioner will be submitting a valuation report in support of the campus. e.Traffic Impact Study i.It is noted the study references the data center campus as having 1,854,000 square feet and 466 parking spaces. The proposed preliminary PUD Plan has the total allowable building area as 2,163,800 square feet and 437 parking stalls. Please revise study to accurately reflect the currently proposed Preliminary PUD plan. The Traffic Impact Study is being revised consistent with the revisions to the Major Change. ii.Staff defers to the City Engineer for further review comments of the Traffic Impact Study. Noted. f.Natural Resources Information (NRI) Report i.The petitioner has provided a Natural Resources Information report dated June 2024 as prepared by the Kendall County Soil & Water Conservation District. The report provides commentary on the subject property related to current conditions of natural resources such as soil composition, drainage, runoff, and wetland/flood information. ii.Staff defers to the City Engineer regarding the findings of this report. Noted. 13.COMMUNITY MEETING - Per Section 10-8-8-F-1-a of the Unified Development Ordinance states a community meeting of area/neighborhood property owners, explaining the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment conducted by the petitioner at their own expense and at a location of their choosing may be required as a recommendation from the Plan Council prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing date. a.Due to the petitioner’s request to reorient and resize the proposed data center buildings on the campus and the proximity of those structures to the residential land uses to the south on Faxon Road and west on Eldamain Road north of the BNSF railroad, staff recommends the petitioner reach out to the homeowners regarding the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing. Petitioner has endeavored to schedule meetings with each of the nearby residential property owners. 14.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDIES a.Has the petitioner completed, or does the petitioner intend to complete, additional environmental impact studies such as a Water Usage Study, Air Quality Study, EcoCAT Assessment, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment, Hazardous Materials/Chemical Handling Study, or Climate Resiliency and Heat Island Impact Analysis associated with the proposed data center campus development? If so, please provide copies of any completed studies and an anticipated timeline for any studies still in progress. Laura Cottrell is the Senior Director of Environmental Compliance at CyrusOne. Laura is working on documentation that is responsive to many of the issues identified above. We anticipate submittal additional documentation in advance of the public hearing. We also anticipate that Laura will participate in the public hearing process. With that being said, we believe that many of these considerations are beyond the scope of the proposed Major Change. b.Will the petitioner prepare a public-facing Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document addressing environmental and operational topics associated with the proposed data center campus, including but not limited to the proposed air-cooled chillers, rooftop units (RTUs), tier classification and operation of backup generators, evaluation of cleaner alternatives to traditional diesel backup generators, operation of the proposed closed-loop cooling system, anticipated water consumption and recycling measures, and the types of chemicals or treatment agents proposed to be utilized within the cooling and mechanical systems? Petitioner is actively working on a publicly facing webpage that will address facts concerning the proposed development. We anticipate that the website will be active in advance of the public hearing. East Dundee, IL 60118 RE: Cyrus One - Yorkville Project Number(s): 2512170 [6097.00-IL] County: Kendall Dear Applicant: Adam Rawe Division of Ecosystems and Environment 217-785-5500 May 01, 2025 Scott Neville Pinnacle Engineering Group 1051 E. Main St, Suite 217 This letter is in reference to the project you recently submitted for consultation. The natural resource review provided by EcoCAT identified protected resources that may be in the vicinity of the proposed action. The Department has evaluated this information and concluded that adverse effects are unlikely. Therefore, consultation under 17 Ill. Adm. Code Part 1075 is terminated. This consultation is valid for two years unless new information becomes available that was not previously considered; the proposed action is modified; or additional species, essential habitat, or Natural Areas are identified in the vicinity. If the project has not been implemented within two years of the date of this letter, or any of the above listed conditions develop, a new consultation is necessary. The natural resource review reflects the information existing in the Illinois Natural Heritage Database at the time of the project submittal, and should not be regarded as a final statement on the site being considered, nor should it be a substitute for detailed site surveys or field surveys required for environmental assessments. If additional protected resources are encountered during the project¶s implementation, you must comply with the applicable statutes and regulations. Also, note that termination does not imply IDNR's authorization or endorsement of the proposed action. Please contact me if you have questions regarding this review. JB Pritzker, Governor Natalie Phelps Finnie, Director 02 September 2025 State Historic Preservation Office-IDNR Attn: Review & Compliance One Natural Resources Way Springfield, Illinois 62702 RE: SHPO No. 018050925 Dear State Preservation Staff: At the request of our client, Pinnacle Engineering Group, we have attached a pdf copy of our report of a 46.0-acre portion of the 229.0-acre parcel located at 2700 Eldamain Road near Yorkville in Kendall County, Illinois for review and comment. This project identified two archaeological sites within the project portion examined. We are recommending the sites be determined as Not Eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Based on this recommendation our findings are for a determination of No Historic Properties for this project and for cultural resource clearance. If you have any questions about the project, please contact me at (217) 333-1636 or (847) 287- 9045. Sincerely, Kevin McGowan a: Final Report electronically to SHPO.Review@Illinois.gov c: Ms. Leia J. Cooney, Pinnacle Engineering Group Kendall County PLEASE REFER TO: SHPO LOG #018050925 Yorkville NEC Eldamain Rd & Faxon Rd Sections:18,19-Township:37N-Range:7E Ineligible Sites: 11KE1460, 11KE1461 IEPA, Pinnacle-6097.00-IL, PSAAP-25-108 New Construction, Cyrus One- Yorkville September 24, 2025 Scott Neville Pinnacle Engineering Group 1051 E. Main St. Suite 217 East Dundee, IL 60118 The Illinois State Historic Preservation Office is required by the Illinois State Agency Historic Resources Preservation Act (20 ILCS 3420, as amended, 17 IAC 4180) (Act) to review all state undertakings for their effect on cultural resources. Pursuant to this requirement, we have received information regarding the above-referenced project for our comment. We have reviewed the reports of archaeological and architectural surveys and they appear adequate. No historic properties were identified within the area of potential visual effects, and two (2) archaeological sites were identified within the 46 acres of proposed project area that were surveyed. We concur that neither site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Our files do not identify any known historic properties within the remainder of the proposed project area, nor is it within the high probability area for archaeological resources as defined in the state Act. You have indicated there is no public funding, nor is the proposed project on public land. Accordingly, that portion of the proposed project area is EXEMPT from survey requests pursuant to Section 6 of the Act. An archaeological survey of the remaining 183 acres is not required under Illinois law. Since the area has never been surveyed for archaeological resources, however, it is possible that archaeological sites are present but remain unidentified. Please consider assisting the State of Illinois in its efforts to preserve and protect historic resources by sharing with us the results of any due diligence archaeological surveys. Early awareness of the presence of historic properties may help prevent unanticipated discoveries and potential construction delays The project, as proposed, is compliant with the Act. This letter remains in effect for two (2) years from the date of issuance. This approval does not pertain to any discovery during construction, nor is it a clearance for purposes of the Illinois Human Remains Protection Act (20 ILCS 3440). According to the information provided there is no federal involvement in your project. If your project will use any federal loans or grants, need any federal agency permits (including non-reporting), use any federal property, or involve any assistance from a federal agency, then your project must be reviewed under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended. Please notify us immediately if this is the case. Additional survey coverage may be necessary. Please contact Jeff Kruchten, Principal Archaeologist, at 217/785-1279 or jeff.kruchten@illinois.gov if you need assistance. Sincerely, Carey L. Mayer, AIA Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Page 1 of 7 WorkingBuildings | Cerami | Longman Lindsey | Valcoustics | Jaffe Holden April 22, 2026 Ref: CyrusOne Yorkville AHJ Noise Study Trinity Project #25251401.0112 This memo documents compliance with the Yorkville Noise Code as required by the City of Yorkville, as well as the State-level noise requirements outlined in Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code. Our analysis considers projected sound levels from data center cooling equipment, back-up generators, transformers, and other auxiliary equipment. Additionally, measurement results from a 24-hour background noise survey are included for reference. 1.0 Noise Code The City of Yorkville, IL Noise Code is summarized below. Yorkville, Illinois Code of Ordinances Title 4, Chapter 4 – Noise Ordinance No person shall operate or cause to be operated any source of sound in such a manner as to create a sound level which exceeds the sound level limits in the table below. Table 1: Yorkville, IL Sound Level Limits Time of Day Receiving Property Land Use Residential Commercial Public Open Spaces Daytime (7am – 10pm) 60 dBA 67 dBA 67 dBA Nighttime (10pm – 7 am) 50 dBA 67 dBA 67 dBA A. Measurement may be made anywhere within the receiving property, but must be made at least three feet (3') from any building facade or other surface. The sound level meter shall be set to A-weighting with slow meter response, with a measured Lmax sound level. B. Measurement may be made at any height above grade, at or near locations that are regularly occupied by people. For example, a measurement may be made at a position three feet (3') to the exterior of a second-floor window since people can be expected to occupy the second-floor room. C. Measurement may be made inside a structure on the receiving property, in any space that is classified as inhabitable and constructed with necessary City construction permits. Page 2 of 7 WorkingBuildings | Cerami | Longman Lindsey | Valcoustics | Jaffe Holden As outlined in Table 2 of Section 4-4-5, a 5 dB penalty applies to impulsive sound sources, and a 10 dB penalty applies to tonal sources. Operational noise of the data center equipment is anticipated to be continuous rather than impulsive, and not subject to the 5 dB penalty. Equipment attenuation will be coordinated such that pure tones are not generated, and therefore not subject to the 10 dB penalty. Illinois Pollution Control Board Within the Illinois Administrative Code, the Illinois Pollution Control Board specifies allowable noise levels based on the land use classifications of both the noise source and the receiving property. This state-wide Code, enforceable by law enforcement agencies, includes specific octave-band sound levels. Title 35: Environmental Protection – Subtitle H: Noise – Ch. 1: Pollution Control Board A person must not cause or allow the emission of sound from any property-line noise source located on any Class A, B, or C land to any receiving Class A land that exceeds any allowable octave band sound pressure level specified in the following table, when measured at any point within the receiving Class A land. Sound pressure levels must be measured at least 25 feet from the property-line noise source. Table 2: Maximum Sound Levels to Class A Land Frequency (Hz) Allowable Octave-Band Sound Pressure Level (dB) C to A B to A A to A Day Night Day Night Day Night 31.5 75 69 72 63 72 63 63 74 67 71 61 71 61 125 69 62 65 55 65 55 250 64 54 57 47 57 47 500 58 47 51 40 51 40 1000 52 41 45 35 45 35 2000 47 36 39 30 39 30 4000 43 32 34 25 34 25 8000 40 32 32 25 32 25 Overall dBA* 61 51 55 44 55 44 * Overall dBA levels are not stated in the IPCB code but have been included for reference “Daytime hours” means any continuous 16 hour period between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. local time. “Nighttime hours” means the 8 hours between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. that are not part of the 16 continuous daytime hours. We have received confirmation that the CyrusOne Yorkville Data Center campus will be classified as Class C land. We note that the allowable noise levels at residences (Class A) are 61 and 51 dBA (day/night), which is in-line with levels specified in the Yorkville Code. Page 3 of 7 WorkingBuildings | Cerami | Longman Lindsey | Valcoustics | Jaffe Holden The Illinois Administrative Code additionally prohibits the emission of any prominent discrete tone from any property-line noise source located on Class A, B, or C land to any receiving Class A, B, or C land, when measured at any point within the receiving land, at least 25 feet from the property-line noise source. Discrete tones are allowed if the source is at least 10dB quieter than the octave-band Code limit. Equipment attenuation will be studied with the manufacturer to ensure noise emissions are not tonal after attenuation is applied. 2.0 Site Survey The following section summarizes our procedure and findings from our site survey conducted from September 3 to September 4, 2024. 2.1 Measurement Locations We performed three 24-hour measurements in September 2024 at the locations shown in Figure 1, below. Figure 1: 24-Hour Measurement Locations Leq – Or the equivalent continuous sound level, represents the average sound level over a specified period of time. L90 - Or the 90th percentile noise levels, represents the noise level exceeded 90% of the time within each hour, effectively capturing the background noise during the quietest periods. This metric helps assess the ‘worst-case’ noise conditions, providing an understanding of the site’s baseline noise environment. Page 4 of 7 WorkingBuildings | Cerami | Longman Lindsey | Valcoustics | Jaffe Holden 2.2 Measurement Results Noise levels at Long-Term Meters A and C were largely controlled by intermittent traffic noise, and Long-Term B was controlled by train noise, which passed by throughout the day. Measured sound levels are presented in Figures 2 and 3. Figure 2: 24-Hour Survey Results (September 3-4, 2024) Spikes in measured LAeq levels are primarily due to trains, traffic, or other loud, temporary events. The average recorded values are presented in Table 3, below. Table 3: Long Term Measurement Results (dBA re: 20 µPA) Position Time Average Sound Pressure Level (dBA) L90 Leq Long Term A 7am – 10pm 45 50 10pm – 7am 38 47 Long Term B 7am – 10pm 45 70 10pm – 7am 41 72 Long Term C 7am – 10pm 54 60 10pm – 7am 41 54 25 35 45 55 65 75 12:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:000:001:002:003:004:005:006:007:008:009:0010:0011:0012:00Sound Pressure Level (dB re: 20µPa)Time Measurements 9/3/24 to 9/4/24 Long Term A LAeq Long Term B LAeq Long Term C LAeq Long Term A LAS90 Long Term B LAS90 Long Term C LAS90 Page 5 of 7 WorkingBuildings | Cerami | Longman Lindsey | Valcoustics | Jaffe Holden 3.0 Data Center Parameters At full build-out, the project site will consist of eight data center buildings. Each building includes air-cooled chillers, RTUs, back-up generators, and UPS fans. The campus also contains a substation with eight transformers. The following sound data has been provided by the manufacturer and included in our model. Table 4: Equipment Sound Power Levels Equipment Type Octave Band Center Frequency (Hz) dBA 63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k Chiller Discharge 98 111 108 105 101 97 91 85 107 Compressor 81 89 85 95 99 84 84 76 100 RTU Low-Sound Condenser Fans 78 83 81 80 78 75 71 65 83 Single UPS Fan 72 75 73 69 66 61 56 48 71 The following attenuation data was input into our acoustic model. Rooftop Acoustic Barrier: Absorptive metal acoustic barrier Discharge Attenuator: 8-foot discharge silencer Inlet Attenuator: 2-foot acoustic louver Transformer Attenuation: 5-15 dB reduction depending on location Generator Yard Barrier: CMU block wall Generator Enclosure: Acoustically rated for 77-85dBA @ 23 feet, dependent on location Chiller attenuation is conceptually shown below: Figure 3: Chiller Enclosure Conceptual Diagram Page 6 of 7 WorkingBuildings | Cerami | Longman Lindsey | Valcoustics | Jaffe Holden 4.0 Results The figure and table below summarize projected operational noise levels at various receiver locations, with the Yorkville zoning map overlaid. Applicable Code limits are shown in the table, determined by the land use at each receptor and whether the location lies within the City of Yorkville. Receivers R1, R5-8, and R10 are representative of nearby residences, where code is enforced. Receivers R2-4 and R9 are located outside of the City of Yorkville on land zoned for agriculture and general manufacturing; however, there are currently no buildings on these sites. As a result, no applicable noise code limits apply at these receivers. Daytime noise levels assume testing of two backup generators per building, in addition to all rooftop chillers, RTUs, UPS fans, and transformers operating at maximum design capacity. Nighttime modeling assumes only the chillers, RTUs, UPS fans, and transformers to be operating, as generator testing is anticipated to occur only during daytime hours. Final noise levels may vary as coordination with equipment manufacturers continues; however, compliance with applicable Code limits will be maintained. Noise level receivers are modeled at 5 feet above the ground. Noise levels at existing nearby buildings with taller occupied floor elevations are expected to be similar. Figure 4: Site Layout and Receiver Locations Page 7 of 7 WorkingBuildings | Cerami | Longman Lindsey | Valcoustics | Jaffe Holden Table 5: Projected Data Center Noise Levels Time Period Data Center Noise Level at Receiver (dBA) R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 Daytime* 55 55 70 53 47 43 45 54 51 54 Nighttime* 41 42 45 44 35 30 33 42 38 43 Day / Night Code Limit 60/ 50 - - - 60/ 50 60/ 50 60/ 50 60/ 50 - 60/ 50 * Octave band limits specified by the IPCB will be achieved at all locations indicated with a code requirement Based on our understanding of applicable Noise Codes, the project site is projected to be Code compliant at all surrounding receivers. Future Studies This report only addresses noise produced by the planned CyrusOne Yorkville data center in isolation. Due to the proximity of several other planned data centers, levels at receivers shown in the table north of this site are expected to increase by 1-3 dB assuming 100% simultaneous operation of all data centers. As the sound levels shown at all receivers in our study fall at least 4 dB below the Code requirements, cumulative noise is not expected to exceed Code limits. This concludes our comments at this time. Should you have any questions, comments, or concerns please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you, Josh Cassarino Henry Vandermillen Associate Principal Junior Associate CC: Lucas Schwartz | Trinity Data Center Impact Analysis 2026 AN ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ELECTRIC SYSTEM RELIABILITY AND COST IMPACTS OF A PROPOSED DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE THE POWER BUREAU, LLC Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Approach ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Context ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Wholesale Power Markets. .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Retail Electricity Service. .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Issues and Evaluation .............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Questions Concerning Reliability. ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 Will the data center overload the ComEd network and cause blackouts? ..................................................................................... 7 Are there enough power plants to meet the Project and current ComEd loads? ............................................................................ 9 Questions Concerning Cost. ............................................................................................................................................................. 10 Who will pay the costs to connect the Project to the ComEd distribution network? ..................................................................... 10 Who will pay to deliver electricity to the Project? ...................................................................................................................... 10 Who will pay for the energy supply for the Project? ................................................................................................................... 11 Will increased demand for electricity from the Project increase wholesale electricity costs in Northern Illinois? .......................... 11 Will the Project increase power supply or offset demand in the northern Illinois market? ............................................................ 14 Conclusions.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Page | 1 Executive Summary The development of large new energy users like the proposed 960-megawatt data center in the United City of Yorkville, Illinois (the “Yorkville Data Center”) has raised concerns about potential negative impacts on the reliability of local electric service and increases in overall energy costs for all consumers. CyrusOne (the developer of the Yorkville Data Center) retained The Power Bureau to evaluate whether and to what extent the proposed data center would negatively impact electric service reliability within the regional grid (managed by PJM Interconnection or “PJM”) and the local utility network (operated by Commonwealth Edison or “ComEd”) and to comment on the potential cost impacts of the development. In its review, the Power Bureau considered the general scale and operation of the proposed data center and the conditions within the current wholesale regional energy market. The Power Bureau arranged its analysis around key questions that are intended to focus on key aspects of the broader reliability and cost issues. Based on its analysis, the Power Bureau concludes that the proposed data center will not reduce the reliability of the regional grid or the local utility network. Two primary data points support these conclusions: Engineering analyses by both PJM and ComEd identify that the Yorkville Data Park can connect to the regional grid without causing reliability issues after necessary upgrades have been completed; and, The design of the proposed interconnection that will provide the Yorkville Data Center with electric service provides a functional separation between the data center and existing ComEd customers. In addition, the Yorkville Data Center is unlikely to cause cost increases for ComEd’s current customers. Four primary data points support this conclusion: The data center developer is obligated to pay the full costs of establishing an interconnection to the regional grid through a Transmission Service Agreement (“TSA”) with ComEd. The data center developer will pay for ongoing electricity delivery service through rates that are: i) designed to charge consumers for the costs that they cause; and ii) approved by the Illinois Commerce Commission. The data center must secure its own electricity supply through either the ComEd Rate BESH - Basic Electric Service-Hourly, or through a bilateral agreement with a Retail Electricity Supplier. Neither of these options can cause existing ComEd customers to subsidize the energy supply costs of the proposed data center; and, Price caps and the functions of the wholesale capacity and energy markets will continue to insulate ComEd consumers from electricity price volatility and increases as the Yorkville Data Cetner enters operation. Additionally, we project that the Yorkville Data Center will contribute over $1.8 billion to funding Illinois’ clean energy transition to deploy new generation capacity, reduce energy consumption and peak demand, and workforce training with the following: Over 1,400 MW of new utility-scale solar generation in Illinois. Over 400,000 residential heat pump incentives for ComEd customers. Over 14,000 pre-apprenticeships for renewable energy industry workers. Based on these, the Power Bureau concludes that the Yorkville Data Center will not have negative impacts on network system reliability or energy costs. The Power Bureau appreciates the opportunity to participate in this process and remains available to provide additional context and background on this analysis and conclusions. Page | 2 Approach This report evaluates the potential impacts on electric service reliability and costs related to the proposed development of a 960-megawatt (MW) data center in Yorkville, Illinois (the “Yorkville Data Center” or “Project”). The Power Bureau was retained to evaluate the potential impact of the Project on electricity service reliability and costs. The Power Bureau is an energy planning and procurement consulting firm with long-term experience in wholesale and retail energy issues in Illinois. The CV of the staff that performed this evaluation can be found in Attachment A. The Power Bureau’s activity followed the process outlined below: 1. Review baseline energy cost and reliability metrics for the ComEd Zone of PJM. 2. Identify and evaluate the potential reliability and cost impacts that the Project may present within the ComEd Zone of PJM. 3. Issue this report and be available to respond to further questions from the public and relevant public officials. For this engagement, the Power Bureau reviewed information and documentation from the following parties: 1. CyrusOne (data center developer) 2. Commonwealth Edison (local electric utility) 3. PJM Interconnection (regional grid operator) 4. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (federal energy regulator) 5. Proprietary maps and software containing information concerning transmission and generating assets operating in northern Illinois. Based on the above inputs, the Power Bureau identified the following key questions to serve as the structure for this project: 1. Service Reliability in the ComEd service territory: Will the Project overload the ComEd network and blackouts? Will the Project “take” electricity from current ComEd customers? Which power plants will provide the electricity for the Project? Are there enough power plants to meet Project in the near- and long-term? 2. Questions Concerning Cost: Who will pay for the pay the capital cost of connecting the Project to the ComEd distribution network? Who will pay to deliver electricity to the Project? Who will pay for the energy supply for the Project? Will increased demand for electricity from the Project increase wholesale electricity costs in Northern Illinois? Will the Project increase power supply or offset demand in the northern Illinois market? Context Figure 1: PJM Interconnection (PJM) Page | 3 The issues examined in this report relate to the structure and governance of wholesale power markets. This section provides an overview of these structures to provide context for the later discussions concerning specific questions raised about the potential impacts on service reliability and costs resulting from the operation of the Yorkville Data Center. Wholesale Power Markets. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulates the interstate transmission and sale of electricity under the authority granted by the Federal Power Act (FPA). The reliability of the bulk-power system is the highest priority under the FPA, and all rates and charges for wholesale power must be just reasonable and not unduly preferential or discriminatory. FERC approves reliability standards for the nation’s interconnected regional transmission grids as developed and enforced by North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC). NERC ’s reliability standards must be met by industry participants (i.e., local utilities) which operate within the six NERC regional organizations. The “Reliability First Corporation” is the NERC regional organization that serves northern Illinois. Separately, FERC requires that wholesale power costs to be set through either cost-based or market-based methods. Market-based pricing is typically used by regions served by an Independent Market Operator (ISO) or a Regional Transmission Organization (RTO). Northern Illinois is served by the RTO named PJM Interconnection (“PJM”). PJM uses auctions to establish least-cost power supply. PJM processes also manage the interconnection of generators (e.g., power plants) and large energy users (e.g., data centers) to ensure that the reliability requirements set by NERC and Reliability First Corporation are maintained. The regions served by PJM are indicated in blue in Figure 1. Reliability. Power system frequency (measured in Hertz, “Hz”) reflects the instantaneous balance between power supply and demand on a regional grid. In the US, a frequency of 60 Hz must be maintained to prevent damage to primary grid components which could lead to blackouts. On an operational level, reliability within northern Illinois is managed by PJM and ComEd. To meet grid reliability mandates, PJM performs a range of operational functions including: - Resource Planning. PJM issues two primary annual reports that frame expected resource changes and resulting needs in the longer term. The first is the Regional Transmission Expansion Plan (RTEP) which identified necessary grid improvements to ensure reliability up to 15 years into the future. Specifically, the RTEP tracks Baseline Projects (transmission upgrades required to meet national and regional reliability standards), Generation Mix (analyses of the balance of dispatchable and variable generators on the gird today and proposed for the future), and the Interconnection Queue (the status of new generation projects seeking to connect to the grid). The PJM Load Forecast Report is issued annually and serves as the foundation for both transmission planning and capacity market auctions within PJM over a 20-year planning horizon. The PJM Load Forecast Report contains Peak Demand Estimates (specific summer can winter peak forecasts for each transmission zone) and Growth Drivers (detailed assessment of how data centers, electric vehicles, and building electrification accelerate power demand) - Interconnection Management. PJM must approve all proposed generation assets and large loads before they are allowed to connect to the regional grid to deliver or withdraw power. The interconnection approval process is designed to ensure that output from proposed generation resources (i.e., solar farms, battery storage, natural gas power plants) will not overwhelm transmission system components or fail to synchronize with consumer demand. The interconnection process also ensures that increased demand from proposed new consumers (i.e., factories, data centers, residential housing developments) will not exceed the maximum delivery capabilities of existing generation and transmission systems in either the immediate or long term. - Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) Capacity Auctions. PJM manages annual capacity auctions to secure commitments from power generators to provide generating capacity to meet peak electricity demand within PJM in the subsequent 1 to 3 years. All generating assets connected to the transmission network managed by PJM must participate in the auction (link to the 2027/28 PJM Auction Results). The auction process concludes and a final clearing price is set when enough resources (generators, Page | 4 demand response, etc.) are secured to meet the region's forecasted peak demand, plus a reserve margin. - Supply Scheduling. PJM continuously matches supply with demand by controlling which generating resources deliver electricity to the regional transmission network. PJM utilizes auction processes to select which generating resources operate on a Day-Ahead and Real Time basis. - Ancillary Services. PJM Interconnection manages continuous grid reliability through market-based procurement of four primary ancillary services: Regulation (frequency regulation), Synchronized Reserve, Primary Reserve, and 30-minute Reserve. These services ensure real- time balance of supply and demand, with high participation from batteries for frequency regulation. Cost. PJM utilizes market-based auctions to set prices for electricity capacity, supply and ancillary services and cost-based tariffs to recover costs associated with interconnection to and use of transmission assets. Interconnection Costs (Transmission Access). New generation resources and large loads may connect to the transmission network managed by PJM only when: i) their addition will not cause a loss of system reliability; and, ii) the owners of the proposed new generation resources or large loads pay for transmission system upgrades that would ensure the reliability of the grid after the connection of the new generation resources or large loads. These costs include, but are not limited to planning, engineering, procurement, and construction of transmission line extensions, reconductoring, substations, transformers, breakers, and all other elements required to ensure reliable operation of the transmission network after the introduction of the new generation resource or large load. Annual Planning Resource Auctions (Capacity). PJM’s capacity auctions yield prices for capacity that must be purchased by load serving entities (e.g., local utilities, retail electricity suppliers) that have not already secured capacity from another resource. Day-Ahead and Real Time Energy Auctions (Electricity Supply). PJM conductions Day-Ahead and Rel Time auctions to select which generators will operate each hour in the following day based on prices offered into the auction. Regulation Market (Ancillary Services). Ancillary services are secured through a mix of day-ahead and real-time auctions as well as cost-based tariffs. Transmission Tariff. The cost of utilizing transmission assets in PJM are based on a formula that factors investment costs to build the assets, authorized rate of return (which is set by FERC), and asset utilization. Retail Electricity Service. Power from the PJM regional grid is delivered to consumers in northern Illinois by ComEd’s local delivery network. The design standards and costs related to ComEd’s delivery functions are regulated through a combination of federal and state mandates. The reliability and safety of the local delivery networks is the highest priority for load serving entities like ComEd, and all rates and charges for retail service must be just, reasonable, non-discriminatory, with approval of the Illinois Commerce Commission (“ICC”) and filed with FERC. Reliability Functions. The reliability of local service networks is driven by the ability to construct and maintain multiple (and ideally redundant) connections to the regional power grid, step-down voltages to suitable levels, and then provide a secure and continuous flow of electricity to customer meters. Each stage of this delivery chain requires capital investment as well as ongoing operating costs for planning, management, and operations. The reliability standards for retail electricity services are typically identified in planning documents, filings with regulatory bodies (i.e., PJM, utility commissions) and the load-serving entity’s tariff. - Resource Adequacy Planning. Generally, load-serving entities in Illinois have relied on resource planning provided by their respective RTO or ISO. However, new statute in Illinois now requires the Illinois Commerce Commission to undertake an Integrated Resource Plan (“IRP”) for the state. The IRP must identify gaps between projected consumer demand Page | 5 and available generation resources in future periods, examine options for bridging any resource gaps, and lay out a plan of action for the organization to secure additional capacity on a least-cost basis. - Interconnection Management. All proposed distributed generation assets (i.e., rooftop solar, on-site batteries, etc.) and large loads must receive permission from the local load-serving entity to connect to the local service network. Interconnection approval processes are designed to ensure that distributed generation resources will not cause operational complications or safety issues. Additionally, the interconnection process ensures that increased demand from proposed new loads can be accommodated by the existing physical resources of the local electric network. Typically, the introduction of large new loads will also cause local-serving entities to review their resource adequacy plans. Cost. The costs of retail electric service from the local utility entity may be market-based, cost-based, or a combination of the two as determined by the load-serving entity and state public utility commission. Retail Supply. For investor-owned utilities in Illinois, consumers have the right to secure electricity supply under either default service or through a retail supply agreement with an Alternative Retail Electricity Supplier (“RES” or “ARES”) Both default and RES supply include the sum of wholesale capacity, energy, transmission, and ancillaries. Retail supply price for default service for the pool of ComEd’s residential and small commercial customers are fixed for monthly periods and based on i) energy secured through the Illinois Power Agency’s (“IPA”) competitive procurement processes; ii) capacity prices resulting from the PJM capacity auctions; iii) transmission costs as approved by PJM and FERC; and iv) additional charges related to load balancing and services. Default service for large ComEd customers follows the same inclusions with the exception that the energy supply price is set hourly and based on the PJM hourly wholesale price. Retail supply from a RES or ARES also provides pricing for energy supply, capacity, and transmission as well as service fees and a margin for the supplier. Retail supply from RES or ARES providers differs in that prices are established based on the use patterns of the individual consumer (instead of a pool of different consumers), and the consumer can structure the pricing in a range of options that mitigate risk and provide greater pricing granularity. Typically, prices for retail supply for consumers served by investor-owned utilities in Illinois extend for periods as of between a few months and two to three years. Interconnection Costs. New large customer loads may connect to local service networks only after authorization by the load-serving entity. Typically, the load-serving entity will require that the proposed distributed generation be configured in a manner to ensure the safety and reliability of the local service network. The costs of meeting these configuration requirements are typically paid by the owner of the proposed distributed generation. Owners of new large loads in the ComEd service territory are required to enter a Transmission Service Agreement (“TSA”) that requires contractual commitments and posting of credit to ensure that all interconnection costs will be paid by the large load – even if the load fails to meet its planned size. Delivery Charges. Customers pay for ongoing electricity delivery services through rates charged by the local load-serving entity. Consistent with FERC mandates requiring non-discriminatory pricing, most load-serving entities undertake Cost-of-Service-Studies (COSS) to establish the cost to provide electric service to distinct types of customers (i.e., residential, commercial, industrial), develop tariffs that apply those costs to the appropriate customers, and receive approval of those rates from the public utility commission. In so doing, consumers are protected from subsidizing the delivery charges of other consumers. Taxes and Fees. ComEd applies a series of state and local taxes as well as program fees to all customers. For ComEd, the program charges as generally presented as Riders which apply charges to customers to collect fees to support renewable energy development, utility energy efficiency, job training, and other programs that are required by statute and approved by the ICC. Page | 6 Figure 2 below provides a reference for the reliability and cost-related functions provided by the various parties responsible for wholesale and retail power delivery in Illinois. Figure 2: Primary Parties Responsible for Electricity Service in Central Illinois PARTY RELIABILITY ACTIONS COST ACTIONS Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Requires compliance with reliability standards (established and enforced by NERC under FERC authority) Requires that all generators and load-serving entities be allowed non-discriminatory access to transmission networks Allows costs to be market-based or cost-based Requires that all tariffs be non-discriminatory Regional Transmission Organization Schedule Supply to match Demand (continuously) Evaluate and approve interconnection of Generation and Large Loads to the regional grid while maintaining reliability Plan and approve transmission system expansions Operate competitive auctions (Capacity, Day-Ahead and Real-Time) to select least-cost Supply to match Demand. Approve cost-effective transmission projects Establish cost-based tariffs for transmission Generators Own and reliably operate Generation Respond to PJM operational requests/requirements Bid Generation outputs (Capacity, Electricity, Ancillary Services) into PJM-approved auctions and processes Transmission Own and reliably operate high voltage Transmission Respond to PJM operational requests/requirements Fund the operation and maintenance of transmission assets with approved funding and in accord with PJM requirements Retail Electricity Suppliers Secure Capacity from Generators for Load Serving Entities Schedule Energy deliveries from the regional grid Respond to PJM operational requests/requirements Hedge against market volatility (financial, physical) Secure least-cost Supply components (Capacity, Energy) Local Load- Serving Entity Build and operate reliable local distribution networks that connect the regional grid to individual consumers Make / Buy electricity Supply to meet consumer demand Respond to PJM operational requests/requirements Obligation to allocate the costs of building and operating the local distribution network to the cost causers via Cost- of-Service Studies (COSS) Secure stable / least-cost Capacity and Energy for consumers Page | 7 Issues and Evaluation The following series of questions were selected to serve as a framework for the discussion concerning the potential impact of the Project on electrical service reliability and cost. Responses to the questions are intended to provide higher- level information on the specific topic. As such, certain graphics and other information are provided for illustrative purposes. Questions Concerning Reliability. The following section addresses whether and to what extent the Project may impact local and regional system reliability. Will the data center overload the ComEd network and cause blackouts? No. Electric service for the Project (see Figure 3) will be provided by a modification of ComEd’s Plano substation that will accommodate the extension of two (2) 345 kV lines to the site (in yellow). A substation owned and paid for by the developer will deliver power to the data center campus. As such, electric service to the Project will be delivered via dedicated infrastructure built and owned by the developer and served by dedicated transmission lines from ComEd that will be separate from their existing local service network. This isolation from the broader ComEd network will prevent any complications associated with supplying the Project from impacting other customers. Will the Project “take” electricity from current ComEd customers? No. The transmission lines which will serve the Project are part of the regional transmission system that serves the power needs of the entire ComEd region. As conveyed in Figure 4, multiple 345 kV transmission lines (in purple) and 138 kV transmission lines connect multiple substations to power generators (in teal) in the immediate areas and the remaining PJM footprint. As such, the Project cannot “take” or crowd out electricity from other consumers. Further, both PJM and ComEd have evaluated the impact of the Project on the ability of the regional transmission grid and local network to meet the Project ’s electricity demand as well as all other existing ComEd customers and have determined that extending service to the Project will not cause blackouts to ComEd customers after necessary system upgrades (paid for by the developer) are completed. Figure 3: Location of Existing Electric Transmission Infrastructure at the Yorkville Data Center Page | 8 Which power plants will provide the electricity for the Project? To be determined by PJM. As noted above, PJM selects which power plants operate each hour of each day based on the results of the PJM Day-Ahead and Real-Time auctions. Figure 5 conveys the hourly mix of generation within PJM between 2/1/2026 and 2/22/2026. As noted, the generation during each hour can vary widely. Additionally, PJM can import power from neighboring wholesale regions to meet its internal supply needs. Figure 5 tracks the electricity imports Figure 5: Sources of Energy Vary Hourly in PJM Figure 4: Significant power generation and high voltage transmission serving the greater Yorkville region Page | 9 (negative values) and exports (positive values) between PJM and neighboring balancing authorities between 2/21/2026 and 2/21/2026. In short, the Yorkville Data Center will receive electricity generated by whichever power plants (or imports from neighboring regional grids) selected by PJM to ensure sufficient supply to reliability standards. Are there enough power plants to meet the Project and current ComEd loads? Yes. PJM updates load and generation requirements annually. As shown in Figure 6, PJM projects peak load increases through 2045. The Project is projected to begin operations in 2027 and then grow over time to a targeted 960 MW. As such, the additional load for the Project has already been included in PJM’s load forecast. Based on PJM’s evaluation, there is and will be sufficient generating capacity to meet the peak demand of all existing ComEd customers as well as the new load presented by the Project. Moving forward, PJM will expand its generation portfolio and transmission network to allow more capacity to flow through the regional grid. Currently, there are 1,773 separate projects representing over 342,000 MW of maximum facility output (“MFO”) with either active interconnection requests under consideration by PJM, are engaged in engineering and procurement, or are under construction (link to PJM Serial Service Request Status and Cycle Service Request Status queues). Additionally local Figure 5: PJM Continuously Imports and Exports Electricity to Neighboring Regions Page | 10 generation may be accelerated by the ICC ’s new integrated resource plan process that is expected to be completed in 2027. Based on PJM’s evaluation of pending new generation project capacity, all existing customer demand plus the 960 MW of new load associated with the Project can and will be met. Questions Concerning Cost. The overall cost of electric service for existing ComEd customers was also raised by parties. The following questions address aspects of electricity costs for consumers. Who will pay the costs to connect the Project to the ComEd distribution network? The Project developer. Consistent with the ComEd tariff, the data center developer will be responsible for paying the full cost for connecting the Project to the PJM regional grid. This arrangement is enforceable through a structured Transmission Security Agreement (“TSA”) between the data center developer and ComEd. The TSA is a FERC-jurisdictional contract that requires the Project developer to provide long-term financial commitments to cover the cost of all required grid upgrades and protects existing customers from those costs. The TSA requires the Project developer to provide financial security for 10 years of transmission service revenues under a "take or pay” structure that will remain in force even if the data center development does not reach its maximum projected load ramp. If the Project fails to meet its projected load ramp, then the developer is obligated to cover all cost shortfalls, which are then credited back to ComEd customers. The TSA sets clear protections against shifting costs from the data center developer to ComEd customers. Who will pay to deliver electricity to the Project? The Project developer. The Project will be placed into service as a ComEd retail customer under the appropriate approved Delivery Class based on metered peak electrical demand. Once the Project demand exceeds 10 MW it will be placed in the Extra-Large Load Delivery Class. Under the Public Utility Act, utility delivery rates must reflect cost causation. This means that the rates assessed for the Extra-Large Load Delivery Class must reflect the costs that those large customers represent to the ComEd delivery network. The ICC reviews and Figure 6: PJM Load Forecast for ComEd Service Region (2026) Page | 11 approves all proposed cost allocations and rates to prevent cross- subsidization between customer classes. Who will pay for the energy supply for the Project? The Project developer. Utility regulations require that the Project secure its own electricity supply though either the ComEd Rate BESH - Basic Electric Service-Hourly, or through a bilateral agreement with a Retail Electricity Supplier. Neither of these options have any connection to the energy supply rates charged to other ComEd customers that are served through ComEd’s default service or individual supply agreements with the more than 80 Alternative Retail Electricity Suppliers certified to serve ComEd customers. Will increased demand for electricity from the Project increase wholesale electricity costs in Northern Illinois? Not likely. - Background. Electricity supply prices for ComEd customers have varied since the full implementation of the retail choice law in 2007. Figure 7 identifies the changes in the inflation-adjusted electricity supply prices for ComEd’s default rate customers (e.g., the “Price to Compare”) during the month of March in each of most recent fifteen (15) years (orange Figure 7: Inflation-Adjusted Price to Compare for ComEd Customers (2011-2026) $0.0000 $0.0200 $0.0400 $0.0600 $0.0800 $0.1000 $0.1200 $0.1400 ComEd price to Compare(Inflation Adjusted, $/kWh)Historical ComEd Price to Compare (Inflation Adjusted, Monthly Billing Periods) Monthly ComEd Price to Compare (Inflation Adjusted, $/kWh)Average ComEd Price to Compare (Inflation Adjusted, $/kWh) Page | 12 columns) as well as the average price for electricity supply for those months (horizontal blue line). [NOTE: we compare pricing for the month of March in each year to avoid seasonal pricing differences that might skew comparison results]. As observed, the ComEd Price to Compare for March 2026 is slightly above the average inflation-adjusted Price to Compare during the month of March in each of the past fifteen years, and 22% below the price reported for March 2012. Retail electricity supply prices for ComEd customers reflect the costs for three separate wholesale charges: electricity commodity, capacity, and transmission. Electricity commodity and capacity prices are set through PJM’s auction processes while transmission charges are set by PJM tariff. Clearing prices set by auctions change over time based on the relative balance between supply and demand. Additionally, clearing prices in the PJM auctions can also be affected by the costs of fuels (e.g., uranium, coal, natural gas, fuel oil). The primary driver of recent increases in total retail electricity supply prices for ComEd customers has been capacity. Figure 8 shows the pricing history of capacity within the PJM wholesale market. Capacity pricing for ComEd customers tracks with RTO (magenta colored line). As noted, the increase in capacity prices for the June 2025 to May 2026 and the June Figure 8: Inflation-Adjusted Price to Compare for ComEd Customers (March, 2012-2026) Page | 13 2026 to 2027 periods correlates with the increase in overall electricity supply prices identified in Figure 7 above. Capacity prices reflect the overall balance of generating capacity and electricity demand up to three (3) years into the future. Rising capacity prices indicate that demand has increased, or available capacity has decreased. Given that the interconnection approvals for the Project have already been approved for initial power flows to begin during the 2026-2027 period, we project that the capacity requirements for the Yorkville Data Center have already been factored into the PJM capacity auction results. To a lesser extent, increases in wholesale electricity commodity prices have added to total electricity supply prices for ComEd customers. As shown in Figure 7 above, the inflation-adjusted pricing history of average annual wholesale electricity commodity within the PJM between 2011 and 2026. As noted, while wholesale electricity commodity prices did increase during 2025 and 2026, they remain near the fifteen (15) year average and are lower than inflation adjusted prices in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017, 2020 and 2022 to 2023. Rising electricity commodity prices indicate a mix of drivers including increased demand, decreased generation supply, and rising fuel prices (e.g., natural gas, uranium, coal, fuel oil). - Market Responses. Growing demand for electricity is the primary driver for rising capacity and electricity commodity prices in PJM and northern Illinois. In market-based systems such as PJM, higher prices attract new resource development. The deployment of added resources will serve to suppress prices. We note several examples of new generating capacity moving towards deployment in PJM: Organic Capacity Development. 1,773 separate projects representing over 342,000 MW of maximum facility output (“MFO”) are under review for interconnection, have moved to engineering and procurement, or are under construction in PJM (link to PJM Serial Service Request Status and Cycle Service Request Status queues). Accelerated Capacity Deployments. PJM’s has provided accelerated approval of 51 generation projects with 9,361 MW of capacity. 90% of the projects are expected to be online by 2030 and all are projected to be online by 2031. Additionally, PJM has presented a plan to procure up to 15,000 MW of new capacity between September 2026 and March 2027. Retained and Repower Capacity. Approximately 9,600 MW of generating capacity connected to the PJM grid is being repowered (e.g., Crane Nuclear Power Station on Three-Mile Island, PA) or have delayed planned retirement dates. Illinois Renewable Portfolio Standard. Illinois provides incentives that currently support over 13,000 MW of capacity from renewable energy resources. By 2046, the state is projected to grow it renewable energy capacity to over 41,000 MW. - Regulatory Responses. Prompted by concerns about rising electricity prices and grid reliability state and federal policymakers and regulators have intervened with policies designed to constrain prices and deploy more generating capacity. We note several policy interventions in PJM and Illinois: PJM Capacity Market Collar. PJM has implemented a capacity market price collar (e.g., setting a maximum price ceiling and minimum price floor) for its annual capacity auctions. this mechanism limits capacity costs to slightly below the clearing price result for the 2026/27 period and is expected to control capacity costs while ensuring grid reliability. Illinois Battery Energy Storage Program. Under the recently passed Clean and Reliable Grid Affordability Act (CRGA), the state of Illinois is incentivizing 3,000 MW of new battery storage capacity by 2030. Illinois Integrated Resource Plan. Also included in the CRGA is a new process that requires the ICC to assess the state’s capacity requirements and to order increased investment in capacity and efficiency programs (e.g., the Illinois Renewable Portfolio Standard, the Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard, and the new Battery Energy Storage Program) Page | 14 Illinois Nuclear Power Fast-track. In February 2026, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker issued an executive order accelerating the development of new nuclear power plants to add at least 2,000 GW of capacity. The initiative follows the early 2026 lifting of the state's moratorium on new large-scale nuclear construction and aims to bolster grid reliability and meet rising energy demands. - Conclusions. To be clear, increasing energy demand by data centers can increase the clearing prices in the PJM auctions for capacity and electricity commodity, if there is not a corresponding increase in supply or a market intervention. As noted above, the PJM market and Illinois anticipate increasing deployments of electricity generating capacity (which will counter the upward price pressure), and multiple market interventions will also serve to suppress upward price pressure. In the immediate case, it is doubtful that the deployment of the Project will have a discernable impact on capacity or electricity commodity prices for ComEd customers. Will the Project increase power supply or offset demand in the northern Illinois market? Yes. The Yorkville Data Center will provide funding for new generating capacity, energy efficiency programs, and job training for new entrants to the clean technology sector through its payments to ComEd for the following Riders: - Rider REA (Renewable Energy Adjustments). Over the first thirty (30) year operations and at the current rates applied under the Rider REA, the Yorkville Data Center is projected to pay over $878 million. These funds will be used to incentivize the development of new renewable energy resources to serve ComEd customers. Based on the most recent Long Term Renewable Resource Procurement Plan published by the IPA, the level of funding provided by the Project would be sufficient to support over 1,400 MW of utility-scale solar capacity. - Rider EEPP (Energy Efficiency Adjustments). Over the first thirty (30) year operations and at the current rates applied under the Rider EEPP, the Yorkville Data Center is projected to pay over $843 million. These funds will be used to incentivize rebates for energy efficiency technologies for ComEd customers. Based on the current incentives offered by ComEd, the level of funding provided by the Project would be sufficient to support rebates for over 421,000 residential heat pumps. - Rider ETAC (Energy Transition Assistance Charge). Over the first thirty (30) year operations and at the current rates applied under the Rider ETAC, the Yorkville Data Center is projected to pay over $147 million. These funds will be used to incentivize clean energy deployments and job training in the ComEd service territory. Based on Climate Works estimate of a $10,000 cost per participant in the Pre-Apprenticeship programs supported by Rider ETAC funding, the level of funding provided by the Project would be sufficient to support over 14,700 Pre-Apprenticeship trainings. Based on the above, we conclude that the Yorkville Data Center will provide significant and sustained levels of funding to support new renewable energy generation and energy efficiency programs (which will serve to increase supply and decrease demand for electricity to offset upward price pressure), and support job training for new workers seeking careers in the clean energy sector. Page | 15 Conclusions Analysis indicates that deploying a 960 MW data center in the Yorkville Illinois area will not adversely impact the reliability of either the local service network (operated by ComEd) or the broader regional grid (operated by PJM). Evidence in support of these conclusions includes: The Project’s interconnection to the PJM grid is isolated from the remainder of the ComEd electric network; therefore, service challenges at the data center are less likely to cause interruptions to other ComEd customers. Analysis by ComEd and PJM conclude that the available capacity of the high voltage transmission lines that will serve the Project as well as ComEd’s control of the interconnection engineering design and construction will ensure continuity and oversight will be maintained throughout the entirety of the construction process. System impact analyses conducted by PJM under its FERC mandate to ensure the reliability of the regional grid further ensure that generating capacity within the region will be sufficient to meet the capacity requirements of all existing ComEd customers as well as the added load for the Yorkville Data Center. Further, consumers are at no risk of subsidizing the Project electricity supply or delivery costs. Evidence in support of this conclusion includes: The TSA between the Project developer and ComEd to pay all costs incurred to establish a physical service connection to the PJM grid. The application of standard ComEd delivery rates to the Project for electricity over the life of the Project. The requirement for the Project to secure power and electric supply through its own contracting decisions that are separate and apart from the supply arrangements for all other ComEd customers ; and, Lastly, increases in capacity and electricity commodity process are unlikely to increase materially because of the Project new load. Evidence supporting this conclusion includes: Market rates for capacity and energy commodities today are near the long- term average of prices for the region. The load requirements for the Project have already been factored into the PJM forward capacity auctions starting for the delivery year 2026-27. Multiple market responses (e.g., organic development of capacity, incentive for renewable energy resource in Illinois, etc.) and regulatory interventions (e.g., cost caps for the PJM capacity auction through 2030, fast-tracking of new capacity, delayed or reversed retirements of existing capacity resources, etc.) are already underway to deliver more capacity to the PJM market and Illinois (which will suppress future price increases. In closing, The Power Bureau notes the following concerning the Project: If the Project is not built in Yorkville then it is almost certain that one or more data center projects of comparable size will seek to proceed with interconnection to the same transmissions lines. For Yorkville, the impact of this circumstance would be two-fold: - Development at any alternative location in northern Illinois would carry similar reliability and cost impacts for residents; and, - The economic development and resources associated with the Project would be transferred to the new location. In summary, the Power Bureau finds that the operation of the proposed Yorkville Data Center will have minimal – if any – impact on network system reliability or energy costs for the residents of Yorkville. Page | 1 GLOSSARY OF TERMS Term Definition PJM PJM Interconnection is a regional transmission organization (RTO) that coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity in all or parts of 13 states and the District of Columbia. ComEd Commonwealth Edison, commonly known as ComEd, is the largest electric utility in Illinois, serving the Chicago and Northern Illinois area. FERC The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is the U.S. federal agency that regulates the transmission and wholesale sale of electricity and natural gas in interstate commerce. MW Megawatt. A unit of power equal to one million watts. It is commonly used to measure the output of power plants or the amount of electricity required by a large facility. kV Kilovolt. A unit of electrical potential equal to one thousand volts. It is often used to describe the voltage of high-voltage transmission lines. RTO Regional Transmission Organization. An independent organization that coordinates, controls, and monitors the operation of the electrical power system in a particular region. ATTACHMENT A: CV OF POWER BUREAU STAFF MARK PRUITT 291 Riverside Drive, Burns Harbor, Indiana 46304 • (219) 921-3828 • markjpruitt@thepowerbureau.com ENERGY ECONOMICS AND POLICY CONSULTANT 25+ year track-record in energy project development, commodity procurement, and utility regulation. Strategic negotiator with ability to develop beneficial agreements between stakeholders with conflicting and complex agendas. Well-developed management and communication skills with a reputation for credibility and integrity. Core Knowledge and Skill Areas Wholesale & retail energy commodity transactions Strategy development & implementation Generation & efficiency technologies Statistical modeling & financial analysis Alternative project finance structures Negotiations & settlement fulfillment Procurement & sourcing processes Legislative and regulatory processes Renewable/Sustainable Portfolio Standards Program design and management PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE PRINCIPAL, THE POWER BUREAU/ICCAN, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 2011 TO PRESENT Consultant providing energy planning and procurement services to public and private organizations. Established specialty consulting practices focused on reducing energy costs and price risks for small and mid-sized consumers. Optimizing existing regulations and market structures to reduce costs and increase optionality. Developing new opportunities by repositioning energy commodity operations from a static cost-center to a risk-management tool that protects client interests. Advise energy generation developers entering new markets under new statutory designs. Advise energy project developers on site selection, wholesale market rate impacts, government and utility policy, project finance, client acquisition, and incentive development. Challenge Positioning developers and consumers to capture the benefits available in wholesale power markets. Planning Drafting and implementing energy procurement and asset development plans to secure market value, investment returns, and organizational goals. Strategic Sourcing Maximizing benefits of Municipal Aggregation for villages, towns, and counties through procurement methods that reduce transaction premiums Positioning retail electric consumers as wholesale market participants Asset Leveraging Internal process and governance evaluation Creating alliances among existing market participants to foster development of generation, efficiency and demand response products that deliver consumer value. Market Analysis & Monitoring Intervening in regulatory proceedings and drafting state legislation Modeling market price patterns to identify purchasing and selling opportunities Developed Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Roadmap for Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Development. Project Development Advised multiple wind and solar project developments in Illinois under the Future Energy Jobs Act Developed specialized project finance structures to leverage the benefits of Qualified Opportunity Zones, Investment Tax Credits, and Qualifying Facilities compensation under PURPA DIRECTOR, ILLINOIS POWER AGENCY, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 2008 TO 2011 State agency Director chartered to reduce and stabilize consumer electricity costs. Built a new state agency tasked with reversing substantial consumer price increases resulting from electric deregulation. Gained regulatory approval for statewide portfolio planning and hedging strategies valued at over $5.3 billion in annual ATTACHMENT A: CV OF POWER BUREAU STAFF expenditures. Maintained responsibility for planning and oversight of statewide carbon sequestration, renewable portfolio standard compliance, and synthetic natural gas developments. Challenge Satisfy competing policy interests while reducing consumer costs. Fulfill aggressive and expanding mandates during a period of severe resource restrictions. Vision Planning Guided stakeholders in formulating new policies to repositioned default supply electricity purchasing as an actively managed portfolio with cost containment, flexibility, and stability as primary values. Mission Fulfillment Delivered $1.6 billion in electricity cost reductions to Illinois consumers. Introduced procurement planning techniques and adapted solutions to specific market conditions resulting in a balanced portfolio to limited year-over-year price volatility. Change Management Articulated clear objectives and plans to legislators, interest groups, and regulators in public hearings and private meetings to achieve policy consensus. Led consistent and fair negotiations that dramatically enhanced success in transaction efforts. Market Positioning Re-established Illinois as a leading marketplace for electricity transactions by generating solutions to the consumer cost issue without undermining competitive markets. Led regional developers and utilities to secure $2.6 billion in renewable energy funding with 20-year power purchase agreements at historically low market rates. Spearheaded initiatives to support coal gasification projects valued at $10 billion. SENIOR PROGRAM MANAGER, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 2002 TO 2008 Manager for energy commodity procurement for state agencies and municipalities. Selected to restructure operational functions and reverse losses of small commodity procurement program; following successful achievement of immediate objectives, was promoted in 2004 to assume full P&L responsibility for the unit, overseeing marketing, development and roll-out of new services, and administrative functions. Challenge Improve program value for customers while reversing program losses. Bottom Line Improvements Ramped program from net loss to profitability, increased book of business from $2 to $65 million, tripled net program income, and limited administrative costs to 20% total growth. Secured 25% cost savings for participants while reducing price volatility by 20%. Operations Improvement and Expansion Restructured procurement events around common credit terms, conditions, and metrics. Expanded program from 4 to 39 state agencies and 12 municipalities. Captured new customer base by expanding into deregulated electricity markets. Led a comprehensive review of the University’s energy operations to evaluate competitiveness of campus power plants and utility cost allocation methods. Team Development Toured customer facilities with management team to promote need for change, assure services value, and monitor key metrics. PROJECT DEVELOPER, NICOR ENERGY SOLUTIONS. NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS 2000 TO 2002 Developer of energy generation and management solutions and services for regional clients. Contributed to team development of projects financed through alternative mechanisms including federal Super Energy Services Performance Contract, Utility Energy Services, and Enhanced Use Leasing. Revenue Growth Standardized project evaluation and proposal formats to increase bid throughput by 15%. Coordinated the successful $14 million Phase 2 energy services contract proposal for the US Department of Energy Fermi National Laboratory. Process Design Led integration of third-party vendors into project development and cross-marketing sales processes; methods developed were replicated for additional partnership initiatives. ATTACHMENT A: CV OF POWER BUREAU STAFF GENERAL MANAGER, MIDWESTERN ENERGY CONSULTANTS, MARYLAND HEIGHTS, MISSOURI 1994 TO 2000 Provider of energy efficiency and security glass coatings. Converted a glazing company operating in the small-scale residential sector to a commercially oriented glass safety and security provider. Managed budget planning, sales, staffing, contract negotiations, supplier relations, project management, and administrative functions. Performance Increased year-over-year sales revenues by 9-20% on increased margins, countered seasonality in earnings cycle through expanded customer base and integrated scheduling. Positioning Redirected marketing focus from residential to commercial and institutional; supported by customer research, expanded product lines to include security and safety solutions. DISTRIBUTION MANAGER, MIDWEST ENERGY RESOURCES, MUNDELEIN, ILLINOIS 1990 TO 1994 Distributor of 3M insulation, glazing, and lighting efficiency products. Developed and serviced a network of 3M energy product dealerships in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, and Missouri. Drafted and evaluated business start-up and expansion plans for dealer network members. Financial Performance Delivered year over year revenue growth of 8-10% and increased share of market in key primary markets throughout region by guiding dealers into commercial applications. REPRESENTATIVE CLIENTS Argonne National Laboratory Building Owners and Managers Association Archdiocese of Chicago City of Chicago The Clean Energy Trust Illinois Retail Merchants Association Illinois Green Energy Network Illinois Dept of Commerce Union Bank Illinois Municipal Electric Agency Midwest Renewable Energy Association Korean Power Exchange Metropolitan Mayor’s Caucus University of Chicago Illinois State Senate Illinois Port District Chicago Public Schools Wind & Solar Developers EDUCATION University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois BRADLEY University, Peoria, Illinois Master of Business Administration Bachelor of Arts OTHER ACTIVITIES Adjunct Professor: Master of Science in Energy and Sustainability Program, Northwestern University Laboratory Affiliate: Argonne National Laboratory Judge: Clean Energy Challenge, Clean Energy Trust Mentor: Cleantech Open Past Board Member: Midwest Renewable Energy Association THE FISCAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE A Report to ROSANOVA AND WHITAKER, LTD. From GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES Urban Economists, Market Strategists & Land Use/Public Policy Analysts March 2026 C1713 THE FISCAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE A Report to ROSANOVA AND WHITAKER, LTD. From GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES Urban Economists, Market Strategists & Land Use/Public Policy Analysts March 2026 C1713 APPLYING KNOWLEDGE CREATING RESULTS ADDING VALUE ©2026 Gruen Gruen + Associates. Do not reproduce without written permission from Gruen Gruen + Associates. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 GENERAL ECONOMIC AND FISCAL BENEFITS OF DATA CENTERS .................................. 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS .......................................................................................................................... 3 Tax Revenue Estimates ................................................................................................................................. 3 FISCAL BENEFITS FOR YORKVILLE .................................................................................................... 6 Property Tax Revenue ................................................................................................................................... 6 Electric Utility Tax Revenue ......................................................................................................................... 8 APPENDIX A: PROPERTY TAXES BY DISTRICT ............................................................................ 11 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1: Estimated Annual Revenue Generated by the Proposed CyrusOne C1 Data Center at Build-Out for Yorkville ................................................................................ 4 Table 2: Estimated Annual Property Tax Revenue at Build-out for Yorkville ......................................... 7 Table 3: Estimated Annual Electric Tax Revenue at Build-out for Yorkville .......................................... 9 Table A-1: Estimate of Annual Property Tax Revenue by District.......................................................... 11 THE FISCAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION CyrusOne proposes to develop a eight-building data center campus totaling approximately 1,854,000 square feet of building space on nearly 229 acres at the northeast corner of Eldamain Road and Faxon Road in Yorkville. Buildings 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 are planned to each contain 246,387 square feet of building space and support approximately 72 megawatts (“MW”) of critical IT load (108 MW utility load). Building 2 is planned to include 129,350 square feet of building space with 36 MW of critical IT load (54 MW utility load). Collectively, these eight buildings would support approximately 540 MW of critical IT capacity, assuming a power usage effectiveness (“PUE”)1 of 1.5 and an 80 percent utilization factor.2 Gruen Gruen + Associates (“GG+A”) was asked to estimate the fiscal benefits or tax revenues that the proposed data center campus will generate for the city of Yorkville. This report summarizes the tax revenue estimates. The figures presented in this report are expressed in current 2026 dollars. That is, the possible effects of inflation or deflation are not quantified. GENERAL ECONOMIC AND FISCAL BENEFITS OF DATA CENTERS Data centers enable the storage, processing, and transmission of digital data and information on which firms and organizations depend to operate. Data centers facilitate the scaling of businesses without the need for individual businesses to invest scarce capital in their own secure and reliable digital infrastructure. Jobs associated with the development of data centers include architects, engineers, construction trade workers, and support staff. The operations of data centers provide direct employment opportunities in security, maintenance, and operations support staff to keep the data centers functioning. Communities and regions that experience data center development benefit from improved internet connectivity and accessibility, and more stable, resilient power grids that often are associated with or required by data center developments. The enhancement of digital and utility infrastructure is a comparative advantage for supporting other economic sectors. When a data center opens, it can draw suppliers or vendors to the data center or additional businesses to the broader surrounding area. Other businesses may be attracted or expanded due in part to the availability of high-speed internet connectivity, and other infrastructure enhanced because of the presence of the data center. The development and operation of data centers stimulate demand for 1 PUE is an industry-standard metric used to measure energy efficiency in data center. The PUE indicates how much of the total power applies to computer equipment such as servers, storage, networking etc. as opposed to building infrastructure such as cooling, lighting, etc. Typical PUE values range from 1.1 to 2.0. A measure of 1.0 means that all of the power goes to IT equipment. 2 The utilization factor measures how much of the installed IT capacity (compute, storage, network) is actually being used. The utilization factor is the percentage of a data center’s installed (nameplate) capacity that is actually used at peak demand. The utilization factor equals the actual IT loan or usage divided by the installed or rated IT capacity. An 80 percent utilization factor is very efficient. THE FISCAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 2 infrastructure, technology goods and services, connectivity, and security that ripples through local and regional economies. In addition, as a relatively new land use, data centers provide for a diversification of property tax revenues. Compared to traditional office, industrial, and retail land uses, data centers, however, do not generate significant traffic or parking requirements. Compared to residential uses, data centers generate much less demand for public services. THE FISCAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Tax Revenue Estimates Table 1 summarizes the annual tax revenue the proposed CyrusOne C1 data center campus at build- out and operational is estimated to generate for the city of Yorkville. THE FISCAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 4 TABLE 1 Estimated Annual Revenue Generated by the Proposed CyrusOne C1 Data Center at Build-Out for Yorkville Proposed CyrusOne C1 Data Center Campus Buildings 1 $ 2 $ 3 $ 4 $ 5 $ 6 $ 7 $ 8 $ Total $ Electric Utility Tax Revenue 2,119,450 1,071,193 2,119,450 2,119,450 2,119,450 2,119,450 2,119,450 2,119,450 15,907,343 Property Tax Revenue 117,840 61,864 117,840 117,840 117,840 117,840 117,840 117,840 886,744 Total Annual Revenue 2,237,290 1,133,057 2,237,290 2,237,290 2,237,290 2,237,290 2,237,290 2,237,290 16,794,087 Sources: United City of Yorkville Code of Ordinances Chapter 2, Section 3-2-4 Municipal Utility Tax; CyrusOne; Gruen Gruen + Associates. THE FISCAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 5 The CyrusOne data center campus is forecast to generate approximately $16,794,100 of annual tax revenue for the city of Yorkville General Fund at build-out and full assessment. Electric utility tax revenue is estimated at approximately $15,907,300 and comprises about 95 percent of the direct fiscal benefit to Yorkville. Annual property taxes are forecast to generate an additional approximately $886,700 for Yorkville. Property taxes are forecast to comprise about five percent of the direct fiscal benefit to Yorkville. Buildings 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 are each expected to generate $2,119,400 in annual electric utility tax revenue and $117,800 in annual property tax revenue. Building 2 is estimated to generate $1,071,200 in annual electric utility tax revenue and $61,900 in annual property tax revenue. As summarized in Appendix A, the proposed CyrusOne data center is forecast to generate approximately $15,744,000 in annual property tax revenues for all taxing districts, including Plano School District #88. THE FISCAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 6 FISCAL BENEFITS FOR YORKVILLE Property Tax Revenue Table 2 presents the annual property tax revenue at build-out the operation of the CyrusOne C1 data center campus is estimated to generate for Yorkville. THE FISCAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 7 TABLE 2 Estimated Annual Property Tax Revenue at Build-out for Yorkville Proposed CyrusOne Data Center Campus Buildings 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total Building Space in Square Feet 246,387 129,350 246,387 246,387 246,387 246,387 246,387 246,387 1,854,059 Market Value Per Square Foot $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 $325 Estimated Market Value $80,075,775 $42,038,750 $80,075,775 $80,075,775 $80,075,775 $80,075,775 $80,075,775 $80,075,775 $602,569,175 Equalized Assessed Value1 $26,691,925 $14,012,917 $26,691,925 $26,691,925 $26,691,925 $26,691,925 $26,691,925 $26,691,925 $200,856,392 2024 Yorkville Tax Rate 0.44148% 0.44148% 0.44148% 0.44148% 0.44148% 0.44148% 0.44148% 0.44148% 0.44148% Annual Property Tax Revenue for Yorkville2 $117,840 $61,864 $117,840 $117,840 $117,840 $117,840 $117,840 $117,840 $886,741 1 Equalized assessed value is calculated at 33.33% of market value. Adjusted equalized assessed value factor of 1.0000. 2 Property taxes per $100 of equalized assessed value. Sources: CyrusOne; Kendall County Assessor; Gruen Gruen + Associates. THE FISCAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 8 The completed CyrusOne C1 data center campus is assumed to be valued at $325 per square foot of building space, resulting in an estimated total market value of approximately $602,569,175 upon a full assessment. This assumption is within the range of valuations applied to existing data centers in Elk Grove Village, Itasca, and DeKalb. The market value estimate draws on an identification of assessed values for comparable data center developments including the following: NTT Data, Inc. in Itasca, DuPage County (Parcel Identification Number 03-05-200-043) which consists of two data centers totaling 252,000 square feet built in 2021 and 2024. The market value for the 2024 tax year is reported at $61,974,300 or approximately $246 per square foot. The 2024 property taxes are about $1,496,200; CenterSquare (ORD2) in Elk Grove Village, DuPage County (Parcel Identification Number 03-02-106-001) consists of one 163,747-square-foot building built in 2014. The market value for the 2024 tax year is reported at $51,310,000 or approximately $313 per square foot. The 2024 property taxes are about $1,345,200; and Meta Data Center, in DeKalb, DeKalb County (Parcel Identification Number 11-01-100- 004) consisting of three buildings totaling 3,000,000 square feet built from 2020 to 2023. Based on current real estate tax of $31,458,804, the taxable equalized assessed value is approximately $394,479,700. This results in an estimated market value of $394 per square foot of building space. Note the real estate taxes are based on a 20-year Enterprise Zone tax abatement.3 The total Equalized Assessed Value upon build-out is estimated at approximately $200,856,400. Based on the current city of Yorkville property tax rate, annual property tax revenues at the full campus build-out and assessment are estimated at approximately $886,700. Buildings 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 are estimated to each generate approximately $117,800 in annual property tax for Yorkville. Building 2 is expected to generate approximately $61,900 in annual property tax for Yorkville. Electric Utility Tax Revenue The city of Yorkville imposes an electric utility tax based on monthly consumption. Table 3 presents the annual electric utility tax revenue estimated to be generated by operation of the CyrusOne data center campus. A higher utilization factor means the data center is using its servers and other IT equipment more efficiently, because a greater portion of the installed capacity is actually being used rather than sitting idle. An 80 percent utilization factor is considered efficient. 3 DeKalb Park District missed out on thousands of tax dollars from Meta Data Center | Northern Public Radio: WNIJ and WNIU THE FISCAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 9 TABLE 3 Estimated Annual Electric Tax Revenue at Build-out for Yorkville Proposed CyrusOne Data Center Campus Buildings 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total Building Space in Square Feet 246,387 129,350 246,387 246,387 246,387 246,387 246,387 246,387 1,854,059 Average Monthly Electricity Usage, kWh Per Square Foot 256 244 256 256 256 256 256 256 254.5 Average Monthly Electricity (kWh) 63,072,000 31,536,000 63,072,000 63,072,000 63,072,000 63,072,000 63,072,000 63,072,000 473,040,000 City Electric Tax Rate, Per kWh1 $0.0028 $0.0028 $0.0028 $0.0028 $0.0028 $0.0028 $0.0028 $0.0028 $0.0028 Monthly Tax $176,621 $89,266 $176,621 $176,261 $176,621 $176,621 $176,621 $176,621 $1,325,613 Annual City Electric Tax Revenue $2,119,450 $1,071,193 $2,119,450 $2,119,450 $2,119,450 $2,119,450 $2,119,450 $2,119,450 $15,907,343 1 Effective rate based on sliding scale tax rate of monthly consumption. Sources: CyrusOne; United City of Yorkville, Code of Ordinances Chapter 2, Section 3-2-4 Municipal Utility Tax; Gruen Gruen + Associates. THE FISCAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 10 Information provided by CyrusOne indicates that the eight-building CyrusOne C1 data center campus at full build-out is expected to consume nearly 5.7 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity each year. This reflects an Annual “Power Usage Effectiveness” factor of 1.5 and a typical “utilization” factor of 80 percent. The resulting estimated average monthly electricity consumption totals 473,040,000 kilowatt- hours or about 255 kilowatt-hours per square foot of total building space. The city of Yorkville imposes an electric utility tax rate on a sliding scale based on the level of monthly consumption. The tiered rate ranges from 0.562 cents ($0.00562) per kilowatt-hour for the first 2,000 kilowatt hours consumed to 0.277 cents ($0.00277) per kilowatt-hour for any consumption exceeding 20,000,000 kilowatt-hours. The city’s effective electric tax rate per kilowatt-hour, based on the sliding scale of monthly consumption, is $0.0028 per kilowatt-hour. Buildings 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 are estimated to each generate approximately $2,119,400 in annual electric tax for Yorkville. Building 2 is estimated to generate approximately $1,071,200 in annual electric utility tax revenue for Yorkville. Total monthly tax revenue is estimated to be nearly $1,325,600 for the CyrusOne C1 data campus at full build-out. Accordingly, the CyrusOne C1 data center campus at full build-out is forecast to generate about $15,907,300 in annual electric utility tax revenue for Yorkville. THE FISCAL BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 11 APPENDIX A: ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL PROPERTY TAX BY DISTRICT Table A-1 summarizes the estimate of annual property tax by taxing entity at full build-out of buildings one through eight of the CyrusOne C1 data center campus. TABLE A-1 Estimate of Annual Property Tax Revenue by District Tax Rate1 Buildings 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 (Each Building) Building 2 Total Annual Revenue from All 8 Buildings2 PLANO SCHOOL DISTRICT #88 $5.46402 $1,458,452 $765,669 $10,974,833 BRISTOL-KENDALL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT $0.62408 $166,579 $87,452 $1,253,505 KENDALL COUNTY $0.52808 $140,955 $73,999 $1,060,682 CITY OF YORKVILLE $0.44148 $117,840 $61,864 $886,741 JR COLLEGE #516 $0.41827 $111,644 $58,612 $840,122 FOREST PRESERVE $0.1304 $34,806 $18,273 $261,917 YORKVILLE LIBRARY $0.11642 $31,075 $16,314 $233,837 BRISTOL TOWNSHIP $0.06679 $17,828 $9,359 $134,152 BRISTOL TWP ROAD $0.0489 $13,052 $6,852 $98,219 TOTAL $7.83844 $2,092,231 $1,098,394 $15,744,008 1 Current property tax rates, per $100 of Equalized Assessed Value, for taxes payable 2025. 2 Based on projected Equalized Assessed Value of $200,856,392 for the completed data center campus. Sources: Kendall County Assessor; Gruen Gruen + Associates. Plano School District #88 is estimated to receive the largest share of annual property tax revenue at $10,974,800. Bristol-Kendall Fire Protection District is estimated to receive $1,253,500 in annual property tax revenue. Kendall County is estimated to receive $1,060,700 in annual property tax revenue. At full build-out, the CyrusOne data center campus is estimated to generate property tax revenue of approximately $15,744,000 per year for all the taxing entities listed in Table A-1. Gruen Gruen + Associates (GG+A) is a firm of economists, sociologists, statisticians and market, financial and fiscal analysts. Developers, public agencies, attorneys and others involved in real estate asset management utilize GG+A research and consulting to make and implement investment, marketing, product, pricing and legal support decisions. The firm's staff has extensive experience and special training in the use of demographic analysis, survey research, econometrics, psychometrics and financial analysis to describe and forecast markets for a wide variety of real estate projects and economic activities. Since its founding in 1970, GG+A has pioneered the integration of behavioral research and economic analysis to provide a sound foundation for successful land use policy and economic development actions. GG+A has also pioneered the use of economic, social and fiscal impact analysis. GG+A impact studies accurately and comprehensively portray the effects of public and private real estate developments, land use plans, regulations, annexations and assessments on the affected treasuries, taxpayers, consumers, other residents and property owners. San Francisco: Denver: Chicago: (415)433-7598 (720) 583-2056 (847) 317-0634 www.ggassoc.com APPLYING KNOWLEDGE, CREATING RESULTS, ADDING VALUE THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE A Report to ROSANOVA & WHITAKER, LTD. From GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES Urban Economists, Market Strategists & Land Use/Public Policy Analysts February 2026 C1713 THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE A Report to ROSANOVA & WHITAKER, LTD. From GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES Urban Economists, Market Strategists & Land Use/Public Policy Analysts February 2026 C1713 APPLYING KNOWLEDGE CREATING RESULTS ADDING VALUE ©2026 Gruen Gruen + Associates. Do not reproduce without written permission from Gruen Gruen + Associates. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – ECONOMIC IMPACT ESTIMATES ................................................. 1 Kendall County .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Construction Impacts Kendall County ........................................................................................................... 3 On-going Impacts Kendall County ................................................................................................................. 3 Yorkville .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Construction Impacts Yorkville ....................................................................................................................... 5 On-going Impacts Yorkville ............................................................................................................................. 5 ECONOMIC IMPACTS ON THE YORKVILLE AND KENDALL COUNTY ECONOMIES .. 6 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Data Sources ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Construction Impacts Kendall County ....................................................................................................... 7 Construction Impacts Yorkville ................................................................................................................... 8 On-going Impacts Kendall County ........................................................................................................... 10 On-going Impacts Yorkville ....................................................................................................................... 13 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Annual One-Time and On-going Economic Impacts of the Proposed CyrusOne Data Center Development on the Kendall County Economy ................................. 2 Table 2: Annual One-Time and On-going Economic Impacts of the Proposed CyrusOne Data Center Development on the Yorkville Economy ............................................. 4 Table 3: One-Time Economic Impacts of Construction on Kendall County Economy ....................... 7 Table 4: One-Time Economic Impacts of Construction on Yorkville Economy ................................... 9 Table 5: On-going Annual Economic Impacts of Operations on Kendall County Economy ............ 11 Table 6: On-going Annual Economic Impacts of Operations on Yorkville Economy ........................ 13 THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION CyrusOne proposes to develop an eight-building data center campus totaling approximately 1,854,059 square feet of building space on approximately 229 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Eldamain Road and Faxon Road in Yorkville. Buildings 1, and 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 are planned to each contain 246,387 square feet of building space and support approximately 72 megawatts (“MW”) of critical IT load (108 MW utility load). Building 2 is planned to include 129,350 square feet of building space with 36 MW of critical IT load (54 MW utility load). Gruen Gruen + Associates (“GG+A”) was asked to evaluate and describe the economic impacts that the CyrusOne data center development is estimated to generate within the city of Yorkville and Kendall County. This report summarizes the economic impact estimates associated with the development and operation of the CyrusOne data center development by construction phase and upon full build-out. The figures presented in this report are expressed in constant 2026 dollars. That is, the possible effects of inflation or deflation on future economic activities are not quantified. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - ECONOMIC IMPACT ESTIMATES Kendall County Table 1 summarizes the estimated annual one-time construction and on-going economic impacts of the proposed CyrusOne data center development on the Kendall County economy. THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 2 TABLE 1 Annual One-Time and On-going Impacts of the Proposed CyrusOne Data Center on the Kendall County Economy (in $ Millions)1 Proposed CyrusOne Data Center Campus Buildings 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total One-Time Impacts of Construction (Average Annual)2 Jobs3 289 193 289 289 289 289 289 289 277 Labor Income4 $19.6 $13.0 $19.6 $19.6 $19.6 $19.6 $19.6 $19.6 $18.7 Output5 $111.2 $74.1 $111.2 $111.2 $111.2 $111.2 $111.2 $111.2 $106.6 On-Going Annual Impacts at Full- Buildout Jobs3 249 134 249 249 249 249 249 249 1,881 Labor Income4 $24.9 $13.4 $24.9 $24.9 $24.9 $24.9 $24.9 $24.9 $187.4 Output5 $139.7 $75.2 $139.7 $139.7 $139.7 $139.7 $139.7 $139.7 $1,053.2 1 Total gross impact include direct, indirect, and induced effects. Figures are rounded. 2 Total average annual construction impact is not cumulative or the sum of Buildings 1 through 8. Total for construction is the average annual over the 10-year construction process. Each building is estimated to be constructed in 15 months. 3 Full- and part-time employment (jobs). 4 Wages, salaries, benefits, and proprietor income. 5 Local value of goods and services produced or sold. Sources: RIMS II, Regional Production Division, Bureau of Economic Analysis; Gruen Gruen + Associates. THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 3 Construction Impacts Kendall County The construction of the CyrusOne data center development is estimated to be associated with 277 construction-related jobs (average annual for a period of one year for all eight buildings) within the Kendall County economy. The total average annual labor income related to construction is estimated at approximately $18.7 million. The construction of the CyrusOne data center development is estimated to generate $106.6 million in average annual economic output (volume of economic activity) within Kendall County. For each building 1 and 3 through 8 construction economic impacts are estimated to include 289 annual jobs with an associated annual labor income of $19.6 million. The construction economic impacts of Building 2 are estimated to include 193 annual jobs with an associated annual labor income of $13.0 million. On-going Economic Impacts Kendall County On-going operations of the CyrusOne data center development at full build-out are estimated to support 1,881 permanent jobs within the Kendall County economy. The total annual labor income is estimated at $187.4 million or approximately $99,700 per job. CyrusOne data center operations are estimated to generate total annual output (or the volume of economic activity) within Kendall County of approximately $1,053.2 billion. The occupancy and operations of each building 1 and 3 through 8 is estimated to be associated with 249 annual jobs and annual labor income of $24.9 million. The occupancy and operations of Building 2 is estimated to be associated with 134 annual jobs and an annual labor income of $13.4 million. Yorkville Table 2 summarizes the estimated annual one-time construction and on-going economic impacts of the CyrusOne data center development on the Yorkville economy. THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 4 TABLE 2 Annual One-Time and On-going Impacts of the Proposed CyrusOne Data Center on Yorkville Economy (in $ Millions)1 Proposed CyrusOne Data Center Campus Buildings 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Total One-Time Impacts of Construction (Annual Average) 2 Jobs3 224 149 224 224 224 224 224 224 214 Labor Income4 $15.9 $10.6 $15.9 $15.9 $15.9 $15.9 $15.9 $15.9 $15.3 Output5 $88.6 $59.1 $88.6 $88.6 $88.6 $88.6 $88.6 $88.6 $84.9 On-Going Annual Impacts at Full Build-out Jobs3 150 81 150 150 150 150 150 150 1,133 Labor Income4 $19.6 $10.5 $19.6 $19.6 $19.6 $19.6 $19.6 $19.6 $147.5 Output5 $112.2 $60.4 $112.2 $112.2 $112.2 $112.2 $112.2 $112.2 $845.6 1 Total gross impact include direct, indirect, and induced effects. Figures are rounded. 2 Total average annual construction impact is not cumulative or the sum of Buildings 1 through 8. Total for construction is the average annual over the 10-year construction process. Each building is estimated to be constructed in 15 months. 3 Full- and part-time employment (jobs). 4 Wages, salaries, benefits, and proprietor income. 5 Local value of goods and services produced or sold. Sources: RIMS II, Regional Production Division, Bureau of Economic Analysis; Gruen Gruen + Associates. THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 5 Construction Impacts Yorkville Nearly 80 percent of the construction-related economic impacts are estimated to occur within Yorkville. Construction impacts associated with the development of the CyrusOne CI data center are estimated to include 214 average annual jobs with associated average annual labor income of about $15.3 million. For each building 1 and 3 through 8 construction economic impacts within Yorkville are estimated to include 224 annual jobs and associated annual labor income of $15.9 million. The construction economic impacts of Building 2 within Yorkville are estimated to include 149 annual jobs and an associated annual labor income of $10.6 million. On-going Impacts Yorkville About 60 percent of the permanent jobs and 79 percent of the annual labor income are estimated to occur within Yorkville. On-going operations of the CyrusOne data center development at full build- out are estimated to support 1,133 permanent jobs within the Yorkville economy. The total annual labor income is estimated at $147.5 million or approximately $130,000 per job. CyrusOne data center operations are estimated to generate total annual economic output within the Yorkville economy of $845.6 million. The occupancy and operations of each building 1 and 3 through 8 is estimated to be associated with 150 annual jobs and an annual labor income of $19.6 million. The occupancy and operations of Building 2 is estimated to be associated with 81 annual jobs and an annual labor income of $10.5 million. THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 6 ECONOMIC IMPACTS ON THE YORKVILLE AND KENDALL COUNTY ECONOMIES Introduction Three kinds of economic impacts will be associated with the proposed CyrusOne data center development and operations: (1) employment; (2) income (the sum of wages and salaries); and (3) output, or the volume of goods and services produced. These three types of economic impacts are defined and estimated in terms of: Direct Effects – The number of jobs, income, and economic output supported by the expenditures made on the initial development and by the operations of the CyrusOne data center; and Indirect and Induced Effects – The changes in the number of jobs, income, and output produced, based on interindustry transactions and interdependencies among industries. In addition to these indirect or spillover effects, indirect effects also include what are sometimes referred to as “induced effects” which occur as wages paid to employees get spent and recirculated within the local economy. The initial development and construction activity will generate temporary or “one-time” impacts within the local economy. Once completed and occupied, the operations of the CyrusOne data center development will generate “on-going” or recurring economic impacts on the local and regional economy as the data center produces sales, pays wages to employees, and purchases goods and services from other vendors or contractors in the local economy. Data Sources The economic impact analysis is based on anticipated characteristics of the proposed data center development, provided by representatives of CyrusOne, and RIMS II input-output multipliers obtained from the United States Bureau of Economic Analysis, a provider of custom input-output data.1 1 A common method of estimating the economic impacts of real estate development is through the use of input- output models. Input output models are based on an extensive table or snapshot of the region’s market transactions between industry sectors, between industry and household sectors and between regional sectors and sectors outside the region. An initial demand stimulus, such as a real estate development, yields a set of multipliers from the transactions table based on distribution of the impacts of the development activity distributed by the affected industry and household sectors to produce final employment, income, and output impacts. Studies in the United States utilizing input-output models tend to employ one of two models. One type is the RIMS II input-output model produced by the United States Bureau of Economic Analysis. This model has been “regionalized” for each of the states and for major metropolitan areas. Earnings by-industry and personal consumption expenditure data are used to include households as both suppliers of labor and purchasers of final goods and services. THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 7 Construction of the CyrusOne data center development is expected to occur over a 10-year period. According to CyrusOne, the total construction hard (core and shell) costs and sitework costs to construct Buildings 1 through 8 totaling about 1,854,059 square feet of space is estimated at $434 per square foot or $805,000,000. This cost estimate excludes expenditure related to land acquisition, soft costs (e.g., architectural and engineering fees), and critical mechanical, engineering, and plumbing fixtures and equipment and IT equipment (which may be purchased from outside of Kendall County). Construction Impacts Kendall County Table 3 summarizes the estimated one-time construction (direct, indirect, and induced) economic impacts on the Kendall County economy. TABLE 3 One-Time Economic Impacts of Construction on Kendall County Economy Average Annual over Construction Period1 Employment1 # Jobs Annual Income2 $ Annual Output3 $ Per Building 1 and 3 – 8 Direct 209.9 15,180,252 84,000,000 Indirect & Induced 79.3 4,374,948 27,216,000 Total 289.2 19,555,200 111,216,000 Multiplier 1.37 1.28 1.32 Per Building 2 Direct 139.9 10,120,168 56,000,000 Indirect & Induced 52.8 2,916,632 18,144,000 Total 192.8 13,036,800 74,144,000 Multiplier 1.37 1.28 1.32 AVERAGE ANNUAL FOR ALL BUILDINGS 1 -8 277.2 18,740,000 106,582,000 Multiplier 1.37 1.28 1.32 1 Total full- and part-time jobs are created for a period of one year. 2 Total labor income associated with additional jobs. 3 Total volume of added economic activity. Sources: RIMS II, Regional Production Division, Bureau of Economic Analysis; Gruen Gruen + Associates. Based upon Regional Input-Output Modeling System (RIMS II) multipliers obtained from the Bureau of Economic Analysis for Kendall County, GG+A estimates that construction of the CyrusOne data center development will generate an annual employment impact within Kendall County totaling about 289 jobs per building for Buildings 1 and 3 through 8. The total annual labor income associated with those jobs within Kendall County is estimated at approximately $19.5 million (or the equivalent of over $67,000 per job) for the construction of each building for Buildings 1 and 3 through 8 during the construction period. Annual economic output in Kendall County from the construction activity is estimated at $111.2 million per building for Buildings 1 and 3 through 8. THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 8 The construction of Building 2 is estimated to generate an annual employment impact within Kendall County totaling about 193 jobs. The construction of Building 2 is estimated to generate an annual labor income associated with those jobs within Kendall County of about $13.0 million during the construction period. Annual economic output associated with the construction of Building 2 is estimated at $74.1 million. As indicated above in Table 3, multipliers associated with the construction activity are estimated to range from 1.28 to 1.37 in Kendall County. The employment multiplier of 1.37 indicates that for every 10 jobs created directly on-site, nearly four additional jobs will be indirectly supported elsewhere in Kendall County from construction activity. The income multiplier of 1.28 indicates for every dollar of income, an additional $0.28 will be indirectly created elsewhere in Kendall County. The output multiplier of $1.32 indicates for every dollar of output directly generated by the development an additional $0.32 will be indirectly generated throughout Kendall County. Construction Impacts Yorkville Table 4 summarizes the estimated one-time construction (direct, indirect, and induced) economic impacts on Yorkville economy. THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 9 TABLE 4 One-Time Economic Impacts of Construction on Yorkville Economy1 Average Annual Over Construction Period1 Employment2 # Jobs Annual Income3 $ Annual Output4 $ Per Building 1 and 3 – 8 Direct 210.0 15,180,252 84,000,000 Indirect & Induced 13.5 743,741 4,626,720 Total 223.5 15,923,993 88,626,720 Multiplier 1.06 1.05 1.05 Per Building 2 Direct 140.0 10,120,168 56,000,000 Indirect & Induced 9.0 495,827 3,084,480 Total 149.0 10,615,995 59,084,480 Multiplier 1.06 1.05 1.05 AVERAGE ANNUAL FOR ALL BUILDINGS 1 – 8 214.2 15,260,493 84,933,940 Multiplier 1.106 1.05 1.05 1 Local estimates assume that seventeen percent (17%) of indirect and induced activity occurs within the city of Yorkville. City estimates are included within Kendall County (i.e., not additive). 2Total full- and part-time jobs are created for a period of one year. 3 Total labor income associated with additional jobs. 4 Total volume of added economic activity. Sources: RIMS II, Regional Production Division, Bureau of Economic Analysis; Gruen Gruen + Associates. Nearly 80 percent of the estimated one-time construction impacts within Kendall County are estimated to occur within the city of Yorkville. This estimate reflects the assumption that approximately 17 percent of the indirect and induced jobs will be located in Yorkville (and 100 percent of direct jobs will be based in Yorkville).2 Construction of the CyrusOne data center development is estimated to generate an annual employment impact within Yorkville totaling about 223 jobs per building for Buildings 1 and 3 through 8. The total annual labor income within Yorkville is estimated at approximately $15.9 million (or the equivalent of over $71,000 per job) per building for Buildings 1 and 3 through 8. The total annual economic output in Yorkville associated with the construction activity is estimated at $88.6 million per building for Buildings 1 and 3 through 8. Construction of Building 2 is estimated to generate an annual employment impact within Yorkville totaling about 149 jobs. Construction of Building 2 is estimated to generate an annual labor income associated with those jobs of $10.6 million during the construction process. The total annual economic 2 U.S. Census Bureau OntheMap indicates for 2023 that 17 percent of Yorkville’s jobs are filled by residents. THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 10 output in Yorkville associated with the construction activity is estimated at $59.1 million for Building 2. The total average annual economic impacts of all eight buildings over the 10-year construction period are estimated at 214 jobs, $15.3 million in labor income, and $84.9 million in economic output. On-going Impacts Kendall County Table 5 summarizes the estimated annual economic impacts associated with the occupancy and operations of the proposed CyrusOne data center on the Kendall County economy. According to CyrusOne approximately 980 employees consisting of CyrusOne employees, tenant employees, maintenance contractors, and security personnel, are anticipated to be based on-site (direct employment) at the eight data center building campus in Yorkville. THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 11 TABLE 5 On-going Annual Economic Impacts of Operations on Kendall County Economy Employment1 # Jobs Annual Income2 $ Annual Output3 $ Per Building 1 and 3 – 8 Direct 130.0 18,475,976 106,533,715 Indirect & Induced 119.5 6,388,993 33,174,599 Total 249.5 24,864,969 139,708,314 Multiplier 1.92 1.35 1.31 Per Building 2 39Direct 70.0 9,948,603 57,364,308 Indirect & Induced 64.3 3,440,227 17,863,246 Total 134.3 13,388,829 75,227,553 Multiplier 1.92 1.35 1.31 TOTAL FOR ALL BUILDINGS 1 – 8 1,880.6 187,443,613 1,053,185,749 Multiplier 1.92 1.35 1.31 1 Total full- and part-time jobs are created for a period of one year. 2 Total labor income associated with additional jobs. 3 Total volume of added economic activity. Sources: RIMS II, Regional Production Division, Bureau of Economic Analysis; Gruen Gruen + Associates. Operations of the CyrusOne data center development are estimated to generate an annual employment impact within Kendall County totaling about 249 jobs per building for Buildings 1 and 3 through 8. The total annual labor income within Kendall County is estimated at approximately $24.9 million (or the equivalent of about $99,700 per job) per building for Buildings 1 and 3 through 8. The total annual economic output impact in Kendall County is estimated at $139.7 million per building for Buildings 1 and 3 through 8. The operations of Building 2 are estimated to generate 134 annual jobs and an associated annual labor income of about $13.4 million within Kendall County. The operations of Building 2 are estimated to generate annual economic output of about $75.3 million within Kendall County. The total annual economic impacts of the operation of all eight buildings upon full build-out is estimated at 1,881 jobs, $187.4 million in labor income, and $1,053.2 billion in economic output. As indicated above in Table 5, multipliers associated with the operations of the data center are estimated to range from 1.31 to 1.92 in Kendall County. The employment multiplier of 1.92 indicates that for every 10 jobs created directly on-site, an additional nine jobs will be supported indirectly in Kendall County from operations activity. The labor income multiplier of 1.35 indicates for every $1.00 directly generated, an additional $0.35 of income is generated elsewhere in Kendall County. The output multiplier of 1.31 indicates for every $1.00 of output directly generated that an additional $0.31 is estimated to be generated throughout Kendall County. THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 12 Ongoing Impacts Yorkville Table 6 summarizes the estimated annual economic impacts associated with the occupancy and operations of the proposed CyrusOne data center on the Yorkville economy. TABLE 6 On-going Annual Economic Impacts of Operations on Yorkville Economy1 Employment2 # Jobs Annual Income3 $ Annual Output4 $ Per Building 1 and 3 – 8 Direct 130.0 18,475,976 106,533,715 Indirect & Induced 20.3 1,086,129 5,639,682 Total 150.3 19,562,105 112,173,397 Multiplier 1.16 1.06 1.05 Per Building 2 Direct 70.0 9,948,603 57,364,308 Indirect & Induced 10.9 584,839 3,036,752 Total 80.9 10,533,441 60,401,060 Multiplier 1.16 1.06 1.05 TOTAL FOR ALL BUILDINGS 1 – 8 1,133.1 147,468,177 845,614,836 Multiplier 1.16 1.06 1.05 1Local estimates assume that seventeen percent (17%) of indirect and induced activity occurs within the city of Yorkville. City estimates are included within Kendall County (i.e., not additive). 2Total full- and part-time jobs are created for a period of one year. 3Total labor income associated with additional jobs. 4 Total volume of added economic activity. Sources: RIMS II, Regional Production Division, Bureau of Economic Analysis; Gruen Gruen + Associates. Approximately 60 percent of the permanent jobs and 79 percent of the annual labor income impacts within Kendall County are estimated to occur within the city of Yorkville.3 The operations of the CyrusOne data center development are estimated to generate annual employment impact within Yorkville totaling about 150 jobs per building for Buildings 1 and 3 through 8. The total associated annual labor income within Yorkville is estimated at approximately $19.6 million (or the equivalent of about $130,000 per job) per building for Buildings 1 and 3 through 8. The total annual economic output impact in Yorkville is estimated at $112.2 million per building for Buildings 1 and 3 through 8. 3 Similar to the estimates for one-time construction impacts, it is assumed that 17 percent of the indirect and induced jobs are filled by Yorkville residents (and 100 percent of the direct jobs are located in Yorkville.) THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED CYRUSONE C1 DATA CENTER DEVELOPMENT IN YORKVILLE GRUEN GRUEN + ASSOCIATES PAGE 13 The operations of Building 2 are estimated to generate 81 annual jobs. The operations of Building 2 are estimated to generate annual labor income of about $10.5 million. The annual economic output associated with the operations of Building 2 is estimated at $60.4 million. The total annual economic impacts for Yorkville of all eight buildings upon full build-out are estimated at 1,133 jobs, $147.5 million in associated labor income, and $845.6 million in economic output. Gruen Gruen + Associates (GG+A) is a firm of economists, sociologists, statisticians and market, financial and fiscal analysts. Developers, public agencies, attorneys and others involved in real estate asset management utilize GG+A research and consulting to make and implement investment, marketing, product, pricing and legal support decisions. The firm's staff has extensive experience and special training in the use of demographic analysis, survey research, econometrics, psychometrics and financial analysis to describe and forecast markets for a wide variety of real estate projects and economic activities. Since its founding in 1970, GG+A has pioneered the integration of behavioral research and economic analysis to provide a sound foundation for successful land use policy and economic development actions. GG+A has also pioneered the use of economic, social and fiscal impact analysis. GG+A impact studies accurately and comprehensively portray the effects of public and private real estate developments, land use plans, regulations, annexations and assessments on the affected treasuries, taxpayers, consumers, other residents and property owners. San Francisco: Denver: Chicago: (415)433-7598 (720) 583-2056 (847) 317-0634 www.ggassoc.com APPLYING KNOWLEDGE, CREATING RESULTS, ADDING VALUE Traffic Impact Study Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois Prepared For: March 24, 2026 SITE DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 1 1. Introduction This report summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for a proposed Data Center to be located in Yorkville, Illinois. The site is located in the northeast quadrant of Eldamain Road with Faxon Road. The plans for the data center call for eight buildings totaling approximately 1,854,805 square feet, 466 parking spaces, and 16 accessible parking spaces. Access to the site will be provided via a full-movement access drive off Eldamain Road. The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed development. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site. The sections of this report present the following: Test • Existing roadway conditions • A description of the proposed development • Directional distribution of the development traffic • Vehicle trip generation for the development • Future traffic conditions including access to the development • Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and evening peak hours • Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access and adjacent roadway system Traffic capacity analyses were conducted for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the following conditions: 1. Existing Conditions – Analyzes the capacity of the existing roadway system using existing peak hour traffic volumes in the surrounding area. 2. Year 2031 No-Build Conditions – Analyzes the capacity of the existing roadway system using existing peak hour traffic volumes including ambient traffic growth. 3. Year 2031 Projected Conditions – Analyzes the capacity of the future roadway system using the projected traffic volumes that include the existing traffic volumes, ambient background traffic growth, and the traffic estimated to be generated by the full buildout of the development. DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 2 Site Location Figure 1 SITE DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 3 Aerial View of Site Figure 2 SITE DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 4 2. Existing Conditions Existing transportation conditions in the vicinity of the site were conducted by KLOA, Inc. in order to obtain a database for projecting future conditions. The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical characteristics of the area roadway system including lane usage and traffic control devices, and existing peak hour traffic volumes. Site Location The site is located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Eldamain Road with Faxon Road in Yorkville, Illinois. Currently, the development site is vacant. The surrounding land uses include residential, industrial, and commercial areas. Notable nearby establishments to the south include the Gas N Wash fuel center, Fox Valley Family YMCA, RKA Gun Gallery, and Plano Auto Repair. Additionally, to the west of the proposed development is a Menards Distribution Center. Existing Roadway System Characteristics The characteristics of the existing roadways near the development are described below and illustrated in Figure 3. Veterans Parkway (US Route 34) is an east-west, minor arterial roadway that in the vicinity of the site provides two travel lanes in each direction separated by a yellow solid line median of approximately 14 feet wide. At its signalized intersection with Eldamain Road, Veterans Parkway provides an exclusive left-turn lane, two through lanes, and an exclusive right-turn lane on both the eastbound and westbound approaches. A standard-style crosswalk is provided on both the east and west legs of the intersection. Veterans Parkway is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), carries an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volume of 17,300 vehicles west of Eldamain Road (IDOT 2023) and 6,200 vehicles east of Eldamain Road (IDOT 2023), and has a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour. Eldamain Road is a north-south minor arterial roadway that provides one lane in each direction in the vicinity of the site with a center two-way left-turn lane south of Menards Distribution Center and a landscape median north of Menards Distribution Center. At its unsignalized intersection with Veterans Parkway, Eldamain Road provides an exclusive left-turn lane, a through lane, and an exclusive right-turn lane. Additionally, Eldamain Road provides a high visibility crosswalk on the southbound approach and a standard crosswalk on the northbound approach. At its unsignalized intersection with Faxon Road, Eldamain Road provides an exclusive left-turn lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on both the northbound and southbound approaches. At its signalized intersection with Galena Road, Eldamain Road provides an exclusive left-turn lane, a through lane, and an exclusive right-turn lane on both the northbound and southbound approaches. Eldamain Road is under the jurisdiction of Kendall County, carries an AADT volume of 7,900 vehicles (IDOT 2023), and has a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour. DRAFT SITE FAMILY YMCA FOX VALLEY CENTER DISTRIBUTION MENARDS GALLERY RKA GUN WASH GAS N 8 TONS OVER 34 Kenig,Lindgren,O'Hara,Aboona,Inc. Figure: 3Job No: 24-050 N NOT TO SCALEDA O R EHS A ROAD GA LE NA BNSF RAILWAY ROADELDAMAINROAD FAXON PARKWAY VETERANS ACCESS DRIVE MENARDS - TRAVEL LANE - TRAFFIC SIGNAL - STOP SIGN XX LEGEND - RAILROAD CROSSING - SPEED LIMIT SIGN EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS 45 45 45 45 TONS 6 LIMIT WEIGHT 45 45 45 7 45 - HIGH VISIBILITY CROSSWALK - STANDARD CROSSWALK YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS DATA CENTER ROAD CORNEILS 45 45 45 5DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 6 Faxon Road is an east-west local road that provides one travel lane in each direction. East of Eldamain Road, Faxon Road is under posted dead-end signage. At its unsignalized intersection with Eldamain Road, Faxon Road is under stop sign control and provides an exclusive left-turn lane and a shared through/right-turn lane on the eastbound approach and a shared left- turn/through/right-turn lane on the westbound approach. Faxon Road is under the jurisdiction of the Township of Yorkville and carries an AADT volume of 700 vehicles (IDOT 2023). Galena Road is an east-west minor arterial roadway that provides one travel lane in each direction. At its signalized intersection with Eldamain Road, Galena Road provides an exclusive left turn lane, one exclusive through lane and an exclusive right turn lane in both the westbound and eastbound approach. Galena Road is under the jurisdiction of the city of Yorkville and carries an AADT volume of 6,800 vehicles west of Eldamain Road (IDOT 2023) and 6,200 vehicles east of Eldamain Road (IDOT 2023). Existing Traffic Volumes In order to determine current traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, KLOA, Inc. conducted peak period vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle traffic counts using Miovision Video Scout Collection Units on Tuesday, March 3, 2026, during the weekday morning (6:00 to 9:00 A.M.) and weekday evening (3:00 to 6:00 P.M.) peak periods at the following intersections: 1. Veterans Parkway (US 34) with Eldamain Road 2. Eldamain Road with Faxon Road 3. Eldamain Road with Menards Distribution Center access drive 4. Eldamain Road with Galena Road From the turning movement count data, it was determined that the weekday morning peak hour generally occurs between 6:30 A.M. and 7:30 A.M. and the weekday evening peak hour generally occurs between 3:15 and 4:15 P.M. These two respective peak hours will be used for the traffic capacity analyses presented later in this report. Additionally, previous traffic counts conducted at the intersection of Eldamain Road with Corneils Road in October 2023, were utilized and balanced to reflect 2026 conditions. The existing peak hour vehicle traffic volumes are shown in Figure 4 and copies of the traffic count summary sheets are included in the Appendix. DRAFT SITE 34 405 (187)178 (632)157 (481)484 (193)223 (136)131 (124)219 (162) 433 (531) 222 (636) 143 (63 ) 152 (96 ) 44 (56 ) 12 (4) 69 (129) 54 (91)17 (43)57 (86)1 (1) 0 (1) 0 (1)0 (3)41 (31) 0 (0) 7 (3)4 (7)548 (339)77 (54) 69 (189)76 (131)93 (241)56 (47)32 (65)81 (91)8 (118) 31 (187)65 (157)3 (15)131 (423)459 (287)217 (532)20 (29) 21 (40)12 (38)33 (24)106 (178)10 (33)0 (4)70 (217)Kenig,Lindgren,O'Hara,Aboona,Inc. Figure: 4Job No: 24-050 N NOT TO SCALEDA O R EHS A ROAD GA LE NA BNSF RAILWAY ROADELDAMAINROAD FAXON LEGEND 00 (00) - AM PEAK HOUR (6:30-7:30 AM) - PM PEAK HOUR (3:15-4:15 PM) PARKWAY VETERANS ACCESS DRIVE MENARDS EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES 7 YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS DATA CENTER ROAD CORNEILS 7DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 8 Crash Data Summary KLOA, Inc. obtained crash data0F 1 from IDOT for the most recent available five years (2018 to 2022) for the intersections of Eldamain Road with Corneils Road, Eldamain Road with Faxon Road, Eldamain Road with Galena Road, and Eldamain Road with Veterans Parkway. Summaries of the crash data are shown in Tables 1 through 4. Table 1 ELDAMAIN ROAD WITH VETERANS PARKWAY – CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Frequency Angle Head On Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2018 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2019 1 0 0 7 1 3 0 12 2020 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 5 2021 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 8 2022 0 0 0 3 1 8 2 14 Total 1 0 0 14 2 21 2 40 Average <1.0 <1.0 0 2.8 <1.0 4.2 <1.0 8 Table 2 ELDAMAIN ROAD WITH GALENA ROAD – CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Frequency Angle Head On Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2018 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 3 2019 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 2020 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 4 2021 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 2022 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Total 2 0 0 4 2 5 0 13 Average <1.0 0 0 <1.0 <1.0 1 0 2.6 1 IDOT DISCLAIMER: The motor vehicle crash data referenced herein was provided by the Illinois Department of Transportation. Any conclusions drawn from analysis of the aforementioned data are the sole responsibility of the data recipient(s). DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 9 Table 3 ELDAMAIN ROAD WITH FAXON ROAD – CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Frequency Angle Head On Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Average 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 4 ELDAMAIN ROAD WITH CORNEILS ROAD – CRASH SUMMARY Year Type of Crash Frequency Angle Head On Object Rear End Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2021 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Average 0 0 0 0 0 <1.0 0 <1.0 DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 10 3. Traffic Characteristics of the Proposed Development In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. Proposed Site and Development Plan The proposed 228-acre site is proposed to contain eight two-story data center buildings totaling approximately 1,854,805 square feet with a total of 466 parking spaces, including 16 accessible parking spaces. Access to the site will be provided via a full-movement access drive approximately 2,040 feet north of Faxon Road aligned opposite the existing Menards access drive on the east side of Eldamain Road. This access drive will provide one inbound lane and two outbound lanes striped for an exclusive left-turn lane and a through/right-turn lane. Outbound movements will be under stop sign control. As discussed later in this report, a southbound left turn lane serving this access drive should be provided via restriping the existing median and a northbound right-turn lane will be warranted and should be provided on Eldamain Road serving this access drive. Two proposed emergency exits will be provided with (1) located on the east side of Eldamain Road approximately 1,170 feet north of the main proposed access drive and (2) located on the west side of Beecher Road on the east side of the site. A copy of the site plan is included in the Appendix. Directional Distribution The respective directional distributions of how development traffic will approach and depart the site were estimated based on a combination of existing travel patterns, the location of the site relative to area roadways, accessibility to interchanges, and the orientation and physical restrictions of the surrounding roadway system. The estimated directional distribution for the proposed development is illustrated in Figure 5. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes To determine the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hour vehicle trip generation for the proposed development, information published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition was utilized. ITE Land-Use Code 160 (Data Center) rates were used for the proposed data center. Copies of the ITE trip generation summary sheets are included in the Appendix. Table 5 summarizes the trips projected to be generated by the proposed data center. DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 11 Table 5 PROJECTED SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour Daily Trips In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 160 Data Center (1,854,805 s.f.) 73 30 103 18 75 93 677 676 1353 DRAFT SITE 34 1 0 %10%5% 20%35%2100'1170'2040'15% 5% LEGEND 00' 00%- PERCENT DISTRIBUTION - DISTANCE IN FEET Kenig,Lindgren,O'Hara,Aboona,Inc. Figure: 5Job No: 24-050 N NOT TO SCALEDA O R EHS A ROAD GA LE NA BNSF RAILWAY ROADELDAMAINROAD FAXON PARKWAY VETERANS ACCESS DRIVE MENARDS DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION 7 YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS DATA CENTER ROAD CORNEILS 12DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 13 4. Projected Traffic Conditions The total projected traffic volumes include the existing traffic volumes, increase in background traffic due to growth, and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed subject development. Development Traffic Assignment The peak hour traffic volumes projected to be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the area roadways based on the established directional distribution (Figure 5). Figure 6 shows the assignment of the development-generated traffic volumes. Background (No-Build) Traffic Conditions The existing traffic volumes (Figure 4) were increased by a regional growth factor to account for the increase in existing traffic related to regional growth in the area (i.e., not attributable to any particular planned development). Based on Average Daily Traffic (ADT) projections provided by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP), the existing traffic volumes were increased by an annually compounded growth rate of 1.20 percent per year for six years (buildout year plus five years) for a total of approximately seven percent to project Year 2031 background (no-build) conditions, as illustrated in Figure 7. A copy of the CMAP letter is included in the Appendix. Additionally, the traffic estimated to be generated by the data center development to be located on the east side of Beecher Road between Corneils Road and Faxon Road was also included as part of the background traffic volumes. Access to this development will be provided via a full- movement access drive located on the east side of Beecher Road. Figure A included in the Appendix illustrates the site traffic assignments of this development to the study area intersections. Total Projected Traffic Volumes The total projected traffic volumes include the Year 2031 no-build traffic volumes (Figure 7) and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development (Figure 6). Figure 8 shows the Year 2031 total projected traffic volumes. DRAFT SITE 34 7 (2)4 (1)7 (2)10 (25)11 (27)4 (11)47 (11)19 (48)47 (11)19 (48)11 (3)2 (4)3 (8)22 (6)4 (1)2 (4)9 (23)26 (7)6 (15)3 (8)25 (6) 15 (3) Kenig,Lindgren,O'Hara,Aboona,Inc. Figure: 6Job No: 24-050 N NOT TO SCALEDA O R EHS A ROAD GA LE NA BNSF RAILWAY ROADELDAMAINROAD FAXON LEGEND 00 (00) - AM PEAK HOUR (6:30-7:30 AM) - PM PEAK HOUR (3:15-4:15 PM) PARKWAY VETERANS ACCESS DRIVE MENARDS SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 7 YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS DATA CENTER ROAD CORNEILS 14DRAFT SITE 34 435 (206)192 (682)170 (521)524 (207)245 (147)140 (133)234 (173) 463 (568) 238 (681)70 (168)3 (16)153 (67 ) 47 (60 ) 74 (138) 13 (4)18 (46)61 (92)146 (455)9 (126) 33 (200)87 (97)44 (33) 0 (0) 0 (1) 0 (1) 1 (1)4 (7)0 (3)60 (50) 74 (202)34 (70)81 (140)82 (58)592 (364)58 (97)0 (4)491 (307)41 (27)232 (569)19 (43)23 (37) 24 (49) 163 (103 )113 (190)11 (35)7 (3)75 (232)102 (264)Kenig,Lindgren,O'Hara,Aboona,Inc. Figure: 7Job No: 24-050 N NOT TO SCALEDA O R EHS A ROAD GA LE NA BNSF RAILWAY ROADELDAMAINROAD FAXON LEGEND 00 (00) - AM PEAK HOUR (6:30-7:30 AM) - PM PEAK HOUR (3:15-4:15 PM) PARKWAY VETERANS ACCESS DRIVE MENARDS YEAR 2031 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES 7 YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS DATA CENTER ROAD CORNEILS 15DRAFT SITE 34 438 (214)211 (730)170 (521)524 (208)252 (149)140 (133)249 (176) 463 (568) 238 (681)70 (168)3 (16)153 (67 ) 51 (61) 74 (138) 13 (4)20 (50)65 (103)153 (457)9 (126) 0 (0) 33 (200) 0 (0)87 (97)44 (33) 0 (0) 0 (1)4 (7)60 (50) 74 (202)34 (70)639 (375)11 (27) 19 (48)47 (11)500 (330)43 (31)254 (575)19 (43)23 (37) 28 (50) 69 (100 ) 163 (103 )26 (7)113 (190)11 (35)0 (3)1 (1) 0 (1) 7 (3)0 (4)81 (247)105 (272)91 (165)107 (64) Kenig,Lindgren,O'Hara,Aboona,Inc. Figure: 8Job No: 24-050 N NOT TO SCALEDA O R EHS A ROAD GA LE NA BNSF RAILWAY ROADELDAMAINROAD FAXON LEGEND 00 (00) - AM PEAK HOUR (6:30-7:30 AM) - PM PEAK HOUR (3:15-4:15 PM) PARKWAY VETERANS ACCESS DRIVE MENARDS YEAR 2031 TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES 7 YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS DATA CENTER ROAD CORNEILS 16DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 17 5. Traffic Analysis and Recommendations The following provides an evaluation conducted for the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. The analysis includes conducting capacity analyses to determine how well the roadway system and access drives are projected to operate and whether any roadway improvements or modifications are required. Traffic Analyses Intersection analyses were performed for the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours for the existing, Year 2031 no-build, and Year 2031 total projected traffic conditions. The traffic analyses were performed using the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 7th Edition and analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic 12 software. The analysis for the traffic-signal controlled intersections were accomplished using existing cycle lengths, phasings, and offsets to determine the average overall vehicle delay and levels of service. The analyses for the unsignalized intersections determine the average control delay to vehicles at an intersection. Control delay is the elapsed time from a vehicle joining the queue at a stop sign (includes the time required to decelerate to a stop) until its departure from the stop sign and resumption of free flow speed. The methodology analyzes each intersection approach controlled by a stop sign and considers traffic volumes on all approaches and lane characteristics. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections are included in the Appendix of this report. Summaries of the traffic analysis results showing the level of service and overall intersection delay (measured in seconds) for the existing, Year 2031 no-build, and Year 2031 total projected conditions are presented in Tables 6 through 10. A discussion of the intersections follows. Summary sheets for the capacity analyses are included in the Appendix. DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 18 Table 6 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – ELDAMAIN ROAD WITH VETERANS PARKWAY – SIGNALIZED Peak Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing Conditions Weekday Morning B 14.7 C 27.7 A 1.9 B 14.9 C 26.3 A 4..0 B 12.2 C 26.0 A 3.0 B 13.3 C 22.3 A 2.8 B 19.0 C – 21.7 B – 19.5 B – 17.0 B – 13.7 Weekday Evening C 29.8 D 42.5 A 6.0 C 28.9 D 45.7 A 6.0 B 15.5 C 26.5 A 2.8 B 15.9 C 25.2 A 2.3 C 30.1 D – 37.4 D – 39.6 B – 15.3 B – 14.7 No-Build Conditions Weekday Morning B 14.9 C 27.8 A 2.2 B 15.0 C 26.3 A 4.2 B 12.8 C 27.7 A 3.1 B 14.2 C 23.3 A 2.9 B 19.5 C – 21.8 B – 19.6 B – 18.3 B – 14.5 Weekday Evening C 31.6 D 42.5 A 6.3 C 30.3 D 46.3 A 5.8 B 16.8 C 28.4 A 3.0 B 17.3 C 27.3 A 3.2 C 30.9 D – 37.8 D – 40.4 B – 16.4 B – 16.3 Projected Conditions Weekday Morning B 16.0 C 28.7 A 2.2 B 15.3 C 27.2 A 4.1 B 12.8 C 29.0 A 3.1 B 14.6 C 23.0 A 2.8 B 19.8 C – 22.5 B – 19.2 B – 19.1 B – 14.3 Weekday Evening C 32.5 D 42.7 A 6.3 C 30.6 D 46.8 A 5.6 B 16.9 C 28.8 A 3.0 B 17.8 C 27.5 A 3.7 C 30.9 D – 38.1 D – 40.5 B – 16.7 B – 16.6 Letter denotes Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. L – Left Turn T – Through R – Right Turn DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 19 Table 7 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – ELDAMAIN ROAD WITH ASHE ROAD/GALENA ROAD – SIGNALIZED Peak Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall L T R L T R L T R L T R Existing Conditions Weekday Morning B 13.8 C 26.6 A 0.3 B 16.1 C 23.3 A 0.1 A 9.0 B 16.3 A 1.5 A 9.0 B 17.6 A 1.8 B 15.5 B – 17.8 B – 18.4 B – 14.3 B – 12.3 Weekday Evening B 16.3 C 28.3 A 3.1 B 17.8 C 30.7 -- A 8.4 B 13.8 A 2.3 A 7.8 C 20.8 A 2.0 B 16.2 B – 18.2 C – 25.0 A – 9.9 B – 15.5 No-Build Conditions Weekday Morning B 14.0 C 26.7 A 0.3 B 16.3 C 23.3 A 0.1 A 9.2 B 17.4 A 1.7 A 9.0 B 18.0 A 2.1 B 16.0 B – 17.9 B – 18.4 B – 15.3 B – 12.8 Weekday Evening B 16.4 C 28.2 A 3.5 B 18.0 C 30.8 -- A 8.7 B 14.2 A 2.3 A 8.0 C 22.5 A 2.0 B 16.8 B – 18.3 C – 25.1 B – 10.3 B – 16.7 Projected Conditions Weekday Morning B 14.0 C 26.7 A 0.6 B 17.1 C 23.3 A 0.1 A 9.3 B 17.5 A 1.9 A 9.0 B 18.1 A 2.1 B 16.0 B – 17.7 B – 18.7 B – 15.2 B – 13.0 Weekday Evening B 16.4 C 28.2 A 3.5 B 18.1 C 30.8 -- A 8.8 B 14.3 A 2.3 A 8.0 C 24.2 A 2.0 B 17.2 B – 18.2 C – 25.1 B – 10.2 B – 17.9 Letter denotes Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. L – Left Turn T – Through R – Right Turn DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 20 Table 8 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – EXISTING CONDITIONS – UNSIGNALIZED Intersection Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Eldamain Road with Cornelis Road 1 • Westbound Approach B 13.3 C 15.9 • Southbound Left Turn A 8.5 A 8.0 Eldamain Road with Menards Access Drive 1 • Eastbound Approach B 11.8 C 23.4 • Northbound Left Turn A 8.2 B 10.4 Eldamain Road with Faxon Road2 • Eastbound Approach B 14.0 C 17.5 • Westbound Approach B 11.9 B 14.4 • Northbound Left Turn A 7.6 A 9.7 • Southbound Left Turn -- -- A 8.5 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. 1 – One-way stop control 2 – Two-way stop control DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 21 Table 9 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – YEAR 2031 NO-BUILD CONDITIONS UNSIGNALIZED Intersection Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Eldamain Road with Cornelis Road 1 • Westbound Approach B 14.1 C 17.6 • Southbound Left Turn A 8.6 A 8.1 Eldamain Road with Menards Access Drive 1 • Eastbound Approach B 12.2 D 28.1 • Northbound Left Turn A 8.3 B 10.9 Eldamain Road with Faxon Road2 • Eastbound Approach B 14.8 C 18.7 • Westbound Approach B 12.4 C 15.1 • Northbound Left Turn A 7.6 A 10.0 • Southbound Left Turn -- -- A 8.6 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. 1 – One-way stop control 2 – Two-way stop control DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 22 Table 10 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS – YEAR 2031 PROJECTED CONDITIONS UNSIGNALIZED Intersection Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay Eldamain Road with Cornelis Road 1 • Westbound Approach B 14.7 C 18.3 • Southbound Left Turn A 8.7 A 8.2 Eldamain Road with Menards Access Drive/Proposed Access Drive2 • Eastbound Approach B 13.4 E 37.0 • Westbound Left Turn C 20.0 F 99+ • Westbound Right Turn B 12.1 A 9.7 • Northbound Left Turn A 8.3 B 10.9 • Southbound Left Turn A 8.9 A 7.8 Eldamain Road with Faxon Road2 • Eastbound Approach C 15.6 C 19.7 • Westbound Approach B 12.9 C 15.6 • Northbound Left Turn A 7.7 B 10.2 • Southbound Left Turn -- -- A 8.6 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. 1 – One-way stop control 2 – Two-way stop control DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 23 Discussion and Recommendations The following summarizes how the intersections are projected to operate and identifies any roadway and traffic control improvements necessary to accommodate the development-generated traffic. Eldamain Road with Veterans Parkway The results of the capacity analysis indicate that overall, this intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) B during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS C during the weekday evening peak hour. The eastbound and westbound approaches operate at LOS D or better during the peak hours. The southbound and northbound approaches currently operate at LOS B during the peak hours. Under Year 2031 no-build and total projected conditions, the intersection and all its approaches are projected to continue operating at the same existing levels of service during both peak hours. As such, the intersection has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic that will be generated by the proposed development, and no roadway improvements or traffic control adjustments will be required. Eldamain Road/Ashe Road with Galena Road The results of the capacity analysis indicate that overall, the intersection currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. The westbound approach currently operates at LOS C or better during both peak hours. The eastbound, northbound, and southbound approaches currently operate at LOS B or better during the peak hours. Under Year 2031 no-build and total projected conditions, the intersection is projected to continue operating at the same LOS as existing conditions. As such, the intersection has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic that will be generated by the proposed development, and no roadway improvements or traffic control adjustments will be required. Eldamain Road with Faxon Road The results of the capacity analyses indicate that the eastbound and westbound approaches currently operate at LOS B or better during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hour. Furthermore, the northbound and southbound left turn movements currently operate at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2031 no-build conditions this intersection is projected to continue to operate at the same overall LOS as existing conditions. Under Year 2031 total projected conditions this intersection is projected to continue to operate at the same LOS as no-build conditions, except for the eastbound approach during the weekday morning peak hour and the northbound left turn movement during the weekday evening peak hour which is projected to operate at LOS C and LOS B, respectively. As such, the intersection has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic that will be generated by the proposed development, and no roadway improvements or traffic control adjustments will be required. DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 24 Eldamain Road with Menards Access Drive/Proposed Access Drive The results of the capacity analyses indicate that the eastbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS C during the weekday evening peak hour. Furthermore, the northbound left turn movement currently operates at LOS B or better during the peak hours. Under Year 2031 no-build conditions, the eastbound approach and the northbound left turn movement are projected to continue to operate at the same LOS as existing conditions, except for the eastbound approach during the weekday evening peak hour which is projected to operate at LOS D. As proposed, the site access drive will create the fourth (east) leg of this intersection and will be aligned opposite the Menards access drive. A southbound left turn lane serving the proposed access drive should be provided via restriping the existing median on Eldamain Road. A northbound right- turn lane serving the proposed access drive will be warranted based on Section 2 of the Kendall County Division of Transportation Permit Regulations and Access Control Regulation and should be provided. Both turn lanes should provide a minimum taper length of 180 feet and a minimum storage length of 150 feet. Under Year 2031 total projected conditions, assuming the proposed improvements, this intersection is projected to operate as follows: • The eastbound approach is projected to operate at LOS B during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS E during the weekday evening peak hour. • The northbound and southbound left turn movements are projected to operate at LOS B or better during the peak hours. • The westbound right turn movement is projected to operate at LOS B during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS A during the weekday evening peak hour. • The westbound left turn movement is projected to operate at LOS C during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS F during the weekday evening peak hour. It is important to note that the projected 95th percentile queue length is less than six vehicles, indicating that queues are not expected to spill back or result in internal circulation conflicts within the site. As such, the proposed access drive will adequately accommodate site-generated traffic. DRAFT Proposed Data Center Yorkville, Illinois 25 6. Conclusion Based on the preceding analyses and recommendations, the following conclusions have been made: • The existing roadway system has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development. • The proposed development will not have a significant impact on traffic operations along Eldamain Road. • Access to the proposed development will be provided via a full-movement access drive aligned opposite Menards access drive located on the east side of Eldamain Road approximately 2,040 feet north of Faxon Road o This access drive will provide one inbound lane and two outbound lanes striped for an exclusive left-turn lane and a through/right-turn lane. The outbound movements will be under stop sign control. o A southbound left turn lane serving this access drive should be provided via restriping the existing median. This turn lane should provide a minimum taper length of 180 feet and a minimum storage length of 150 feet. o A northbound right-turn lane will be warranted serving the proposed access drive and should be provided. This turn lane should provide a minimum taper length of 180 feet and a minimum storage length of 150 feet. • Two proposed emergency exits will be provided with (1) located on the east side of Eldamain Road approximately 1,170 feet north of the main proposed access drive and (2) located on the west side of Beecher Road. DRAFT Appendix Traffic Count Summary Sheets Site Plan CMAP 2050 Projections Letter Data Center Traffic Assignment (Figure A) Level of Service Criteria Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets DRAFT Traffic Count Summary Sheets DRAFT Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc.9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018(847)518-9990 mmendoza@kloainc.comCount Name: Eldamain Road with Corneils RoadTMCSite Code:Start Date: 10/31/2023Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeCorneils RoadEldamain RoadEldamain RoadWestboundNorthboundSouthboundU-Turn LeftRight Peds App. Total U-Turn Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn LeftThru Peds App. Total Int. Total12:00 AM0000005207005051212:15 AM0000009009016071612:30 AM010010331034009094412:45 AM0000001630190040423Hourly Total0100106360690124025951:00 AM000000600600909151:15 AM000000500500707121:30 AM00000021030030361:45 AM0000002002006068Hourly Total0000001510160025025412:00 AM00000050050030382:15 AM000000600600707132:30 AM00000014001400505192:45 AM00000081090070716Hourly Total0000003310340022022563:00 AM010010800800505143:15 AM010010700700606143:30 AM00000020102100707283:45 AM0000001300130070720Hourly Total0200204810490025025764:00 AM01001020002000505264:15 AM00000028203000707374:30 AM0000003410350023023584:45 AM012030403043012202369Hourly Total0220401226012801570581905:00 AM0110203820400014014565:15 AM0100106050650015015815:30 AM0220405540590224026895:45 AM0300307370800130031114Hourly Total073010022618024403830863406:00 AM02103086409003270301236:15 AM03205091709802400421456:30 AM0700701076011301610621826:45 AM043070891301020353056165Hourly Total016602203733004030918101906157:00 AM044080125801330132033174DRAFT 7:15 AM01901001113011404460501747:30 AM0540901083011103370401607:45 AM04206095501000336039145Hourly Total01419033043919045801115101626538:00 AM04105068907702440461288:15 AM02103084709101290301248:30 AM06309067407104510551358:45 AM0630905340570339042108Hourly Total0188026027224029601016301734959:00 AM06208071407500340341179:15 AM17109041804901480491079:30 AM0600604060460041041939:45 AM032050476053013803997Hourly Total1225028019924022302161016341410:00 AM04307043204502290318310:15 AM02103044204600310318010:30 AM04206048705500250258610:45 AM031040422044023103381Hourly Total0137020017713019004116012033011:00 AM08109037304000430439211:15 AM02103032003202360387311:30 AM0100010041604701360379411:45 AM0640100341035022903176Hourly Total0266032014410015405144014933512:00 PM041050507057014804911112:15 PM03306031403501430448512:30 PM042060534057014804911212:45 PM040040404044003803886Hourly Total015602101741901930317701803941:00 PM01304058206000400401041:15 PM0320504240460042042931:30 PM03306053405701410421051:45 PM011020532055004104198Hourly Total08901702061202180116401654002:00 PM05207040204201580591082:15 PM04105039704601610621132:30 PM064010048905705650701372:45 PM091010064206605970102178Hourly Total0248032019120021101228102935363:00 PM01203054706102860881523:15 PM000000910100013013233:30 PM0400407960850015101512403:45 PM0940130645069041470151233Hourly Total014602002061902250639704036484:00 PM06309048205001417501892484:15 PM09101004930520814301512134:30 PM03205050505501214101532134:45 PM0550100475052061410147209Hourly Total02311034019415020904060006408835:00 PM0420603350380412301271715:15 PM04004046204802950971495:30 PM0300302640300379082115DRAFT 5:45 PM0210302830310267069103Hourly Total0133016013314014701136403755386:00 PM0310404220440049049976:15 PM0410503200320344047846:30 PM0520702810290033033696:45 PM011020311032003903973Hourly Total01350180133401370316501683237:00 PM0400402210230033033607:15 PM0310401710180023023457:30 PM0400402310240128029577:45 PM011020200020002402446Hourly Total012201408230850110801092088:00 PM0010102020220019019428:15 PM0000001800180130031498:30 PM0100101910200132033548:45 PM000000173020012502646Hourly Total0110207460800310601091919:00 PM0200202130240018018449:15 PM0100101600160022022399:30 PM0000001800180018018369:45 PM011020100010002002032Hourly Total041050653068007807815110:00 PM00000020102100150153610:15 PM000000900901110122110:30 PM000000100010008081810:45 PM0000001000100090919Hourly Total00000049105001430449411:00 PM0000005106009091511:15 PM000000500500120121711:30 PM000000400400170172111:45 PM0000001200120060618Hourly Total000000261027004404471Grand Total1248108035703644270039140127367903806 8077Approach %0.369.530.3--0.093.16.9--0.03.396.7---Total %0.03.11.3-4.40.045.13.3-48.50.01.645.5-47.1-Lights122199-32103284238-352201223286-3408 7251% Lights100.0 89.191.7-89.9-90.188.1-90.0-96.189.3-89.589.8Buses010-1090-90111-1222% Buses0.00.40.0-0.3-0.20.0-0.2-0.80.3-0.30.3Single-Unit Trucks0225-27010627-13301121-122282% Single-Unit Trucks0.08.94.6-7.6-2.910.0-3.4-0.83.3-3.23.5Articulated Trucks044-802455-25003261-264522% Articulated Trucks0.01.63.7-2.2-6.71.9-6.4-2.47.1-6.96.5Bicycles on Road000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road0.00.00.0-0.0-0.00.0-0.0-0.00.0-0.00.0Pedestrians---0----0----0--% Pedestrians----------------DRAFT Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc.9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018(847)518-9990 mmendoza@kloainc.comCount Name: Eldamain Road with Corneils RoadTMCSite Code:Start Date: 10/31/2023Page No: 4Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (3:30 PM)Start TimeCorneils RoadEldamain RoadEldamain RoadWestboundNorthboundSouthboundU-Turn LeftRight Peds App. Total U-Turn Thru Right Peds App. Total U-Turn LeftThru Peds App. Total Int. Total3:30 PM0400407960850015101512403:45 PM09401306450690414701512334:00 PM06309048205001417501892484:15 PM0910100493052081430151213Total028803602401602560266160642934Approach %0.077.822.2--0.093.86.3--0.04.096.0---Total %0.03.00.9-3.90.025.71.7-27.40.02.866.0-68.7-PHF0.000 0.778 0.500-0.692 0.000 0.759 0.667-0.753 0.000 0.464 0.880-0.849 0.942Lights0287-35023016-246026589-615896% Lights-100.0 87.5-97.2-95.8 100.0-96.1-100.0 95.6-95.895.9Buses000-0030-3002-25% Buses-0.00.0-0.0-1.30.0-1.2-0.00.3-0.30.5Single-Unit Trucks001-1010-1007-79% Single-Unit Trucks-0.012.5-2.8-0.40.0-0.4-0.01.1-1.11.0Articulated Trucks000-0060-60018-1824% Articulated Trucks-0.00.0-0.0-2.50.0-2.3-0.02.9-2.82.6Bicycles on Road000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road-0.00.0-0.0-0.00.0-0.0-0.00.0-0.00.0Pedestrians---0----0----0--% Pedestrians----------------DRAFT Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc.9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018(847)518-9990 mmendoza@kloainc.comCount Name:Eldamain+Road+with+Faxon+Road TMCSite Code:Start Date: 03/03/2026Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeFaxon rdFaxon rdeldamain rdeldamain rdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalInt. Total6:00 AM 0 5 0 106 0 1 0 001 0 0 117 10118 0 0 16 2018 1436:15 AM 0 7 0 007 0 0 0 101 0 0 132 00132 0 1 34 0035 1756:30 AM 0 12 0 0012 0 0 0 101 0 0 132 00132 0 0 55 1056 2016:45 AM 0 14 0 0014 0 0 0 000 0 0 137 00137 0 0 30 4034 185Hourly Total 0 38 0 1039 0 1 0 203 0 0 518 10519 0 1 135 70143 7047:00 AM 0 11 0 3014 0 0 0 000 0 2 137 00139 0 0 45 2047 2007:15 AM 0 4 0 408 0 0 0 000 0 2 129 00131 0 0 39 3042 1817:30 AM 0 4 0 105 0 0 0 000 0 0 99 0099 0 0 50 5055 1597:45 AM 0 9 0 1010 0 1 0 001 0 0 89 0089 0 0 57 1058 158Hourly Total 0 28 0 9037 0 1 0 001 0 4 454 00458 0 0 191 110202 6988:00 AM 0 3 1 408 0 0 0 000 0 0 82 2084 0 0 44 3047 1398:15 AM 0 5 0 005 0 0 0 000 0 1 77 0078 0 0 49 2051 1348:30 AM 0 2 0 103 0 0 1 001 0 0 67 0067 0 1 51 1053 1248:45 AM 0 5 1 107 0 0 0 101 0 0 79 0079 0 1 64 1066 153Hourly Total 0 15 2 6023 0 0 1 102 0 1 305 20308 0 2 208 70217 550*** BREAK *** - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- -3:00 PM 0 6 0 006 0 1 0 001 0 0 54 2056 0 0 106 50111 1743:15 PM 0 8 0 008 0 0 0 000 0 3 84 1088 0 0 179 120191 2873:30 PM 0 13 0 0013 0 1 0 001 0 3 74 3080 0 0 177 130190 2843:45 PM 0 8 0 008 0 0 1 001 0 1 112 00113 0 2 133 30138 260Hourly Total 0 35 0 0035 0 2 1 003 0 7 324 60337 0 2 595 330630 10054:00 PM 0 2 0 305 0 0 0 101 0 0 69 0069 0 1 141 50147 2224:15 PM 0 5 1 107 0 1 0 001 0 2 55 0057 0 0 123 70130 1954:30 PM 0 1 0 203 0 0 0 101 0 2 47 0049 0 0 127 70134 1874:45 PM 0 5 0 106 0 0 0 101 0 0 54 0054 0 0 140 60146 207Hourly Total 0 13 1 7021 0 1 0 304 0 4 225 00229 0 1 531 250557 8115:00 PM 0 6 0 107 0 0 0 101 0 0 51 0051 0 0 130 80138 1975:15 PM 0 1 0 304 0 0 0 000 0 1 60 0061 0 0 134 50139 2045:30 PM 0 1 0 304 0 0 0 101 0 1 49 0050 1 1 125 70134 1895:45 PM 1 1 0 002 0 0 0 000 0 2 44 1047 0 1 89 3093 142Hourly Total 1 9 0 7017 0 0 0 202 0 4 204 10209 1 2 478 230504 732Grand Total 1 138 3 300172 0 5 2 8015 0 20 2030 1002060 1 8 2138 10602253 4500Approach % 0.6 80.2 1.7 17.4-- 0.0 33.3 13.3 53.3-- 0.0 1.0 98.5 0.5-- 0.0 0.4 94.9 4.7-- -Total % 0.0 3.1 0.1 0.7-3.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2-0.3 0.0 0.4 45.1 0.2-45.8 0.0 0.2 47.5 2.4-50.1 -Lights1 135 2 29-167 0 4 2 4-10 0 18 1850 8-1876 1 4 1959 103-2067 4120DRAFT % Lights 100.0 97.8 66.7 96.7-97.1 - 80.0 100.0 50.0-66.7 - 90.0 91.1 80.0-91.1 100.0 50.0 91.6 97.2-91.7 91.6Buses0 0 0 1-1 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 7 0-7 0 0 10 0-10 18% Buses 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3-0.6 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.3 0.0-0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0-0.4 0.4Single-Unit Trucks 0 2 1 0-3 0 1 0 3-4 0 1 51 0-52 0 2 59 2-63 122% Single-UnitTrucks0.0 1.4 33.3 0.0-1.7 - 20.0 0.0 37.5-26.7 - 5.0 2.5 0.0-2.5 0.0 25.0 2.8 1.9-2.8 2.7Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0-1 0 0 0 1-1 0 1 122 2-125 0 2 110 1-113 240% ArticulatedTrucks0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0-0.6 - 0.0 0.0 12.5-6.7 - 5.0 6.0 20.0-6.1 0.0 25.0 5.1 0.9-5.0 5.3Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0% Bicycles onRoad0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Pedestrians - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- -% Pedestrians - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- -DRAFT Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc.9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018(847)518-9990 mmendoza@kloainc.comCount Name:Eldamain+Road+with+Faxon+Road TMCSite Code:Start Date: 03/03/2026Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (6:30 AM)Start TimeFaxon rdFaxon rdeldamain rdeldamain rdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalInt. Total6:30 AM 0 12 0 0012 0 0 0 101 0 0 132 00132 0 0 55 1056 2016:45 AM 0 14 0 0014 0 0 0 000 0 0 137 00137 0 0 30 4034 1857:00 AM 0 11 0 3014 0 0 0 000 0 2 137 00139 0 0 45 2047 2007:15 AM 0 4 0 408 0 0 0 000 0 2 129 00131 0 0 39 3042 181Total0 41 0 7048 0 0 0 101 0 4 535 00539 0 0 169 100179 767Approach % 0.0 85.4 0.0 14.6-- 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0-- 0.0 0.7 99.3 0.0-- 0.0 0.0 94.4 5.6-- -Total % 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.9-6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1-0.1 0.0 0.5 69.8 0.0-70.3 0.0 0.0 22.0 1.3-23.3 -PHF 0.000 0.732 0.000 0.438-0.857 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250-0.250 0.000 0.500 0.976 0.000-0.969 0.000 0.000 0.768 0.625-0.799 0.954Lights0 41 0 6-47 0 0 0 0-0 0 4 503 0-507 0 0 136 9-145 699% Lights- 100.0 - 85.7-97.9 - - - 0.0-0.0 - 100.0 94.0 --94.1 - - 80.5 90.0-81.0 91.1Buses0 0 0 1-1 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 1 0-1 0 0 1 0-1 3% Buses - 0.0 - 14.3-2.1 - - - 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.2 --0.2 - - 0.6 0.0-0.6 0.4Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 1-1 0 0 12 0-12 0 0 15 1-16 29% Single-UnitTrucks- 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 - - - 100.0-100.0 - 0.0 2.2 --2.2 - - 8.9 10.0-8.9 3.8Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 19 0-19 0 0 17 0-17 36% ArticulatedTrucks- 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 - - - 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 3.6 --3.5 - - 10.1 0.0-9.5 4.7Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0% Bicycles onRoad- 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 - - - 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 --0.0 - - 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Pedestrians - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- -% Pedestrians - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- -DRAFT Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc.9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018(847)518-9990 mmendoza@kloainc.comCount Name:Eldamain+Road+with+Faxon+Road TMCSite Code:Start Date: 03/03/2026Page No: 4Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (3:15 PM)Start TimeFaxon rdFaxon rdeldamain rdeldamain rdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalInt. Total3:15 PM 0 8 0 008 0 0 0 000 0 3 84 1088 0 0 179 120191 2873:30 PM 0 13 0 0013 0 1 0 001 0 3 74 3080 0 0 177 130190 2843:45 PM 0 8 0 008 0 0 1 001 0 1 112 00113 0 2 133 30138 2604:00 PM 0 2 0 305 0 0 0 101 0 0 69 0069 0 1 141 50147 222Total0 31 0 3034 0 1 1 103 0 7 339 40350 0 3 630 330666 1053Approach % 0.0 91.2 0.0 8.8-- 0.0 33.3 33.3 33.3-- 0.0 2.0 96.9 1.1-- 0.0 0.5 94.6 5.0-- -Total % 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.3-3.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1-0.3 0.0 0.7 32.2 0.4-33.2 0.0 0.3 59.8 3.1-63.2 -PHF 0.000 0.596 0.000 0.250-0.654 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.250-0.750 0.000 0.583 0.757 0.333-0.774 0.000 0.375 0.880 0.635-0.872 0.917Lights0 31 0 3-34 0 1 1 0-2 0 5 298 3-306 0 2 600 32-634 976% Lights- 100.0 - 100.0-100.0 - 100.0 100.0 0.0-66.7 - 71.4 87.9 75.0-87.4 - 66.7 95.2 97.0-95.2 92.7Buses0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 3 0-3 0 0 2 0-2 5% Buses - 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.9 0.0-0.9 - 0.0 0.3 0.0-0.3 0.5Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 1-1 0 1 8 0-9 0 0 12 0-12 22% Single-UnitTrucks- 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 100.0-33.3 - 14.3 2.4 0.0-2.6 - 0.0 1.9 0.0-1.8 2.1Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 1 30 1-32 0 1 16 1-18 50% ArticulatedTrucks- 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 14.3 8.8 25.0-9.1 - 33.3 2.5 3.0-2.7 4.7Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0% Bicycles onRoad- 0.0 - 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Pedestrians - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- -% Pedestrians - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- -DRAFT Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc.9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018(847)518-9990 mmendoza@kloainc.comCount Name:Eldamain+Road+with+Mendards+Access+DriveTMCSite Code:Start Date: 03/03/2026Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeAccess Dreldamain rdeldamain rdEastboundNorthboundSouthboundU-Turn LeftRight Peds App. Total U-Turn LeftThru Peds App. Total U-Turn Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total6:00 AM02406022101012308200281576:15 AM0610016035970132026280542026:30 AM00120120441010145038330712286:45 AM01304044108015202736063219Hourly Total09290380145407055209911702168067:00 AM04307012135014704190502047:15 AM03801105127013203830411847:30 AM044080496010005050551637:45 AM024060119501060531054166Hourly Total01319032032453048501821802007178:00 AM022040107708704670531448:15 AM048012067508104200421358:30 AM056011066407004580531348:45 AM039012011760870573060159Hourly Total0142503903329203250190180208572*** BREAK ***----------------3:00 PM0102503502435059087120991933:15 PM0437001130503308301222101433393:30 PM0557001250483908701163101473593:45 PM010230330586101190113320145297Hourly Total0118188030601801680348043896053411884:00 PM01017027018560740128701352364:15 PM07401107590660132101332104:30 PM06901502460480119501241874:45 PM0490130652058013440138209Hourly Total02739066033213024605131705308425:00 PM0141402806540600120401242125:15 PM0360906540600130101312005:30 PM0340704490530132301351955:45 PM06501107370440873090145Hourly Total0262905502319402170469110480752Grand Total0207329053604461727021730189127702168 4877Approach %0.038.661.4--0.020.579.5--0.087.212.8---Total %0.04.26.7-11.00.09.135.4-44.60.038.85.7-44.5-Lights0157233-39003401651-199101811221-2032 4413% Lights-75.870.8-72.8-76.295.6-91.6-95.879.8-93.790.5DRAFT Buses000-0007-7090-916% Buses-0.00.0-0.0-0.00.4-0.3-0.50.0-0.40.3Single-Unit Trucks01221-3302328-510359-44128% Single-Unit Trucks-5.86.4-6.2-5.21.6-2.3-1.93.2-2.02.6Articulated Trucks03875-11308341-12403647-83320% Articulated Trucks-18.422.8-21.1-18.62.4-5.7-1.917.0-3.86.6Bicycles on Road000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road-0.00.0-0.0-0.00.0-0.0-0.00.0-0.00.0Pedestrians---0----0----0--% Pedestrians----------------DRAFT Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc.9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018(847)518-9990 mmendoza@kloainc.comCount Name:Eldamain+Road+with+Mendards+Access+DriveTMCSite Code:Start Date: 03/03/2026Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (6:30 AM)Start TimeAccess Dreldamain rdeldamain rdEastboundNorthboundSouthboundU-Turn LeftRight Peds App. Total U-Turn LeftThru Peds App. Total U-Turn Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total6:30 AM00120120441010145038330712286:45 AM013040441080152027360632197:00 AM04307012135014704190502047:15 AM0380110512701320383041184Total0826034010547105760144810225835Approach %0.023.576.5--0.018.281.8--0.064.036.0---Total %0.01.03.1-4.10.012.656.4-69.00.017.29.7-26.9-PHF0.000 0.500 0.542-0.708 0.000 0.597 0.872-0.947 0.000 0.878 0.563-0.792 0.916Lights0410-14090455-545013168-199758% Lights-50.038.5-41.2-85.796.6-94.6-91.084.0-88.490.8Buses000-0001-1010-12% Buses-0.00.0-0.0-0.00.2-0.2-0.70.0-0.40.2Single-Unit Trucks015-6048-12072-927% Single-Unit Trucks-12.519.2-17.6-3.81.7-2.1-4.92.5-4.03.2Articulated Trucks0311-140117-180511-1648% Articulated Trucks-37.542.3-41.2-10.51.5-3.1-3.513.6-7.15.7Bicycles on Road000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road-0.00.0-0.0-0.00.0-0.0-0.00.0-0.00.0Pedestrians---0----0----0--% Pedestrians----------------DRAFT Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc.9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018(847)518-9990 mmendoza@kloainc.comCount Name:Eldamain+Road+with+Mendards+Access+DriveTMCSite Code:Start Date: 03/03/2026Page No: 4Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (3:15 PM)Start TimeAccess Dreldamain rdeldamain rdEastboundNorthboundSouthboundU-Turn LeftRight Peds App. Total U-Turn LeftThru Peds App. Total U-Turn Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total3:15 PM0437001130503308301222101433393:30 PM0557001250483908701163101473593:45 PM0102303305861011901133201452974:00 PM0101702701856074012870135236Total011818002980174189036304799105701231Approach %0.039.660.4--0.047.952.1--0.084.016.0---Total %0.09.614.6-24.20.014.115.4-29.50.038.97.4-46.3-PHF0.000 0.536 0.643-0.596 0.000 0.750 0.775-0.763 0.000 0.936 0.711-0.969 0.857Lights0111163-2740149173-322046283-5451141% Lights-94.190.6-91.9-85.691.5-88.7-96.591.2-95.692.7Buses000-0003-3010-14% Buses-0.00.0-0.0-0.01.6-0.8-0.20.0-0.20.3Single-Unit Trucks054-9053-8091-1027% Single-Unit Trucks-4.22.2-3.0-2.91.6-2.2-1.91.1-1.82.2Articulated Trucks0213-1502010-30077-1459% Articulated Trucks-1.77.2-5.0-11.55.3-8.3-1.57.7-2.54.8Bicycles on Road000-0000-0000-00% Bicycles on Road-0.00.0-0.0-0.00.0-0.0-0.00.0-0.00.0Pedestrians---0----0----0--% Pedestrians----------------DRAFT Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc.9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018(847)518-9990 mmendoza@kloainc.comCount Name:Eldamain+Road+with+US+Route+34 TMCSite Code:Start Date: 03/03/2026Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart Timeus 34us 34eldamain rdeldamain rdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalInt. Total6:00 AM 0 41 88 30132 0 11 22 10043 0 4 57 15076 0 10 19 13042 2936:15 AM 0 52 84 190155 0 5 25 12042 0 7 59 28094 0 16 26 15057 3486:30 AM 0 58 126 120196 0 12 43 15070 0 8 53 23084 0 19 24 15058 4086:45 AM 0 51 94 170162 0 16 62 220100 0 6 67 310104 0 16 22 12050 416Hourly Total 0 202 392 510645 0 44 152 590255 0 25 236 970358 0 61 91 550207 14657:00 AM 0 53 93 80154 0 18 39 21078 0 6 60 450111 0 15 27 18060 4037:15 AM 1 57 120 190197 0 23 78 190120 0 12 43 32087 0 26 20 25071 4757:30 AM 0 26 140 120178 0 28 100 140142 0 20 49 610130 0 20 28 17065 5157:45 AM 0 34 126 160176 0 24 71 120107 0 18 44 551117 0 23 38 15076 476Hourly Total 1 170 479 550705 0 93 288 660447 0 56 196 1931445 0 84 113 750272 18698:00 AM 0 24 145 111180 0 23 56 12091 0 18 44 650127 0 18 19 12049 4478:15 AM 0 25 105 120142 0 20 61 10091 0 18 35 540107 0 19 21 10050 3908:30 AM 0 24 118 90151 0 27 77 130117 0 15 33 48096 0 15 16 14045 4098:45 AM 0 35 110 70152 0 36 79 230138 0 17 29 38084 0 14 36 18068 442Hourly Total 0 108 478 391625 0 106 273 580437 0 68 141 2050414 0 66 92 540212 1688*** BREAK *** - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- -3:00 PM 0 29 104 130146 0 30 173 130216 0 17 24 16057 0 24 51 401115 5343:15 PM 0 34 134 160184 0 43 140 110194 0 19 38 29086 0 27 57 730157 6213:30 PM 0 39 127 110177 0 38 171 170226 0 18 36 30084 1 35 74 720182 6693:45 PM 0 50 124 110185 0 50 158 120220 0 11 41 33085 0 38 57 470142 632Hourly Total 0 152 489 510692 0 161 642 530856 0 65 139 1080312 1 124 239 2321596 24564:00 PM 1 39 146 90195 0 58 167 140239 0 17 21 32070 0 31 53 250109 6134:15 PM 0 21 124 161161 0 66 169 60241 0 28 34 400102 0 29 68 390136 6404:30 PM 0 21 82 160119 0 62 169 150246 0 19 28 47094 0 39 47 370123 5824:45 PM 0 34 154 82196 0 63 162 210246 0 16 29 42087 0 31 68 460145 674Hourly Total 1 115 506 493671 0 249 667 560972 0 80 112 1610353 0 130 236 1470513 25095:00 PM 0 37 125 130175 0 61 202 270290 0 18 23 26067 0 33 68 410142 6745:15 PM 0 37 123 20162 1 52 141 260220 0 18 32 33083 0 43 65 410149 6145:30 PM 0 30 127 150172 0 51 208 290288 0 22 33 39194 0 27 59 510137 6915:45 PM 0 23 106 130142 0 37 131 280196 0 15 25 24164 0 37 63 360136 538Hourly Total 0 127 481 430651 1 201 682 1100994 0 73 113 1222308 0 140 255 1690564 2517Grand Total 2 874 2825 28843989 1 854 2704 40203961 0 367 937 88632190 1 605 1026 73212364 12504Approach % 0.1 21.9 70.8 7.2-- 0.0 21.6 68.3 10.1-- 0.0 16.8 42.8 40.5-- 0.0 25.6 43.4 31.0-- -Total % 0.0 7.0 22.6 2.3-31.9 0.0 6.8 21.6 3.2-31.7 0.0 2.9 7.5 7.1-17.5 0.0 4.8 8.2 5.9-18.9 -Lights2 852 2764 267-3885 1 797 2656 348-3802 0 360 843 835-2038 1 552 940 699-2192 11917DRAFT % Lights 100.0 97.5 97.8 92.7-97.4 100.0 93.3 98.2 86.6-96.0 - 98.1 90.0 94.2-93.1 100.0 91.2 91.6 95.5-92.7 95.3Buses0 3 9 4-16 0 17 4 0-21 0 0 5 12-17 0 2 9 3-14 68% Buses 0.0 0.3 0.3 1.4-0.4 0.0 2.0 0.1 0.0-0.5 - 0.0 0.5 1.4-0.8 0.0 0.3 0.9 0.4-0.6 0.5Single-Unit Trucks 0 11 27 9-47 0 6 23 13-42 0 5 17 11-33 0 10 22 15-47 169% Single-UnitTrucks0.0 1.3 1.0 3.1-1.2 0.0 0.7 0.9 3.2-1.1 - 1.4 1.8 1.2-1.5 0.0 1.7 2.1 2.0-2.0 1.4Articulated Trucks 0 8 25 8-41 0 34 21 41-96 0 2 72 28-102 0 41 55 15-111 350% ArticulatedTrucks0.0 0.9 0.9 2.8-1.0 0.0 4.0 0.8 10.2-2.4 - 0.5 7.7 3.2-4.7 0.0 6.8 5.4 2.0-4.7 2.8Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0% Bicycles onRoad0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Pedestrians - - - -4- - - - -0- - - - -3- - - - -1- -% Pedestrians - - - -100.0- - - - --- - - - -100.0- - - - -100.0- -DRAFT Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc.9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018(847)518-9990 mmendoza@kloainc.comCount Name:Eldamain+Road+with+US+Route+34 TMCSite Code:Start Date: 03/03/2026Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (6:30 AM)Start Timeus 34us 34eldamain rdeldamain rdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalInt. Total6:30 AM 0 58 126 120196 0 12 43 15070 0 8 53 23084 0 19 24 15058 4086:45 AM 0 51 94 170162 0 16 62 220100 0 6 67 310104 0 16 22 12050 4167:00 AM 0 53 93 80154 0 18 39 21078 0 6 60 450111 0 15 27 18060 4037:15 AM 1 57 120 190197 0 23 78 190120 0 12 43 32087 0 26 20 25071 475Total1 219 433 560709 0 69 222 770368 0 32 223 1310386 0 76 93 700239 1702Approach % 0.1 30.9 61.1 7.9-- 0.0 18.8 60.3 20.9-- 0.0 8.3 57.8 33.9-- 0.0 31.8 38.9 29.3-- -Total % 0.1 12.9 25.4 3.3-41.7 0.0 4.1 13.0 4.5-21.6 0.0 1.9 13.1 7.7-22.7 0.0 4.5 5.5 4.1-14.0 -PHF 0.250 0.944 0.859 0.737-0.900 0.000 0.750 0.712 0.875-0.767 0.000 0.667 0.832 0.728-0.869 0.000 0.731 0.861 0.700-0.842 0.896Lights1 214 422 47-684 0 54 208 67-329 0 31 208 125-364 0 63 75 64-202 1579% Lights 100.0 97.7 97.5 83.9-96.5 - 78.3 93.7 87.0-89.4 - 96.9 93.3 95.4-94.3 - 82.9 80.6 91.4-84.5 92.8Buses0 1 1 1-3 0 6 2 0-8 0 0 2 1-3 0 0 4 0-4 18% Buses 0.0 0.5 0.2 1.8-0.4 - 8.7 0.9 0.0-2.2 - 0.0 0.9 0.8-0.8 - 0.0 4.3 0.0-1.7 1.1Single-Unit Trucks 0 2 5 5-12 0 1 6 4-11 0 1 3 4-8 0 4 8 4-16 47% Single-UnitTrucks0.0 0.9 1.2 8.9-1.7 - 1.4 2.7 5.2-3.0 - 3.1 1.3 3.1-2.1 - 5.3 8.6 5.7-6.7 2.8Articulated Trucks 0 2 5 3-10 0 8 6 6-20 0 0 10 1-11 0 9 6 2-17 58% ArticulatedTrucks0.0 0.9 1.2 5.4-1.4 - 11.6 2.7 7.8-5.4 - 0.0 4.5 0.8-2.8 - 11.8 6.5 2.9-7.1 3.4Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0% Bicycles onRoad0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Pedestrians - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- -% Pedestrians - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- -DRAFT Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc.9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018(847)518-9990 mmendoza@kloainc.comCount Name:Eldamain+Road+with+US+Route+34 TMCSite Code:Start Date: 03/03/2026Page No: 4Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (3:15 PM)Start Timeus 34us 34eldamain rdeldamain rdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalInt. Total3:15 PM 0 34 134 160184 0 43 140 110194 0 19 38 29086 0 27 57 730157 6213:30 PM 0 39 127 110177 0 38 171 170226 0 18 36 30084 1 35 74 720182 6693:45 PM 0 50 124 110185 0 50 158 120220 0 11 41 33085 0 38 57 470142 6324:00 PM 1 39 146 90195 0 58 167 140239 0 17 21 32070 0 31 53 250109 613Total1 162 531 470741 0 189 636 540879 0 65 136 1240325 1 131 241 2170590 2535Approach % 0.1 21.9 71.7 6.3-- 0.0 21.5 72.4 6.1-- 0.0 20.0 41.8 38.2-- 0.2 22.2 40.8 36.8-- -Total % 0.0 6.4 20.9 1.9-29.2 0.0 7.5 25.1 2.1-34.7 0.0 2.6 5.4 4.9-12.8 0.0 5.2 9.5 8.6-23.3 -PHF 0.250 0.810 0.909 0.734-0.950 0.000 0.815 0.930 0.794-0.919 0.000 0.855 0.829 0.939-0.945 0.250 0.862 0.814 0.743-0.810 0.947Lights1 159 522 44-726 0 185 629 47-861 0 64 112 120-296 1 121 236 208-566 2449% Lights 100.0 98.1 98.3 93.6-98.0 - 97.9 98.9 87.0-98.0 - 98.5 82.4 96.8-91.1 100.0 92.4 97.9 95.9-95.9 96.6Buses0 0 3 3-6 0 3 1 0-4 0 0 2 3-5 0 1 1 0-2 17% Buses 0.0 0.0 0.6 6.4-0.8 - 1.6 0.2 0.0-0.5 - 0.0 1.5 2.4-1.5 0.0 0.8 0.4 0.0-0.3 0.7Single-Unit Trucks 0 2 3 0-5 0 1 4 2-7 0 1 1 1-3 0 1 1 4-6 21% Single-UnitTrucks0.0 1.2 0.6 0.0-0.7 - 0.5 0.6 3.7-0.8 - 1.5 0.7 0.8-0.9 0.0 0.8 0.4 1.8-1.0 0.8Articulated Trucks 0 1 3 0-4 0 0 2 5-7 0 0 21 0-21 0 8 3 5-16 48% ArticulatedTrucks0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0-0.5 - 0.0 0.3 9.3-0.8 - 0.0 15.4 0.0-6.5 0.0 6.1 1.2 2.3-2.7 1.9Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0% Bicycles onRoad0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Pedestrians - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- -% Pedestrians - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- -DRAFT Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc.9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018(847)518-9990 mmendoza@kloainc.comCount Name:Galena+Road+with+Eldamain+Road TMCSite Code:Start Date: 03/03/2026Page No: 1Turning Movement DataStart TimeGalena rdGalena rdeldamain rdeldamain rdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalInt. Total6:00 AM 0 23 34 5062 0 7 9 2018 0 5 76 200101 0 1 16 7024 2056:15 AM 0 40 26 12078 0 17 7 1025 0 6 90 180114 0 1 27 7035 2526:30 AM 0 28 52 14094 0 16 19 3038 0 1 92 140107 0 1 47 10058 2976:45 AM 0 39 34 14087 0 11 16 3030 0 2 95 130110 0 1 29 20050 277Hourly Total 0 130 146 450321 0 51 51 90111 0 14 353 650432 0 4 119 440167 10317:00 AM 0 41 28 4073 0 19 18 4041 0 11 101 150127 0 1 21 15037 2787:15 AM 0 35 38 12085 0 8 16 2026 0 3 113 150131 0 0 34 20054 2967:30 AM 0 36 33 11080 0 11 17 1029 0 7 90 150112 0 1 30 23054 2757:45 AM 0 32 40 18090 0 6 29 1036 0 8 76 15099 0 1 29 14044 269Hourly Total 0 144 139 450328 0 44 80 80132 0 29 380 600469 0 3 114 720189 11188:00 AM 0 21 32 11064 0 12 18 6036 0 3 59 14076 0 3 28 10041 2178:15 AM 0 25 27 9061 0 12 15 0027 0 10 57 10077 0 0 28 8036 2018:30 AM 0 22 22 5049 0 13 15 1029 0 7 56 18081 0 0 30 8038 1978:45 AM 0 27 23 13063 0 9 13 0022 0 4 49 12065 0 0 30 9039 189Hourly Total 0 95 104 380237 0 46 61 70114 0 24 221 540299 0 3 116 350154 804*** BREAK *** - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- -3:00 PM 0 18 23 15056 0 17 27 1045 0 6 29 15050 0 2 75 260103 2543:15 PM 0 20 29 13062 0 24 33 0057 0 11 43 18072 0 7 107 310145 3363:30 PM 0 16 28 12056 0 20 25 1046 0 12 48 27087 0 1 102 230126 3153:45 PM 0 14 24 18056 0 27 38 2067 0 15 34 20069 0 3 102 680173 365Hourly Total 0 68 104 580230 0 88 123 40215 0 44 154 800278 0 13 386 1480547 12704:00 PM 0 13 15 11039 0 18 33 1052 0 3 43 16062 0 4 101 350140 2934:15 PM 0 18 19 14051 0 13 34 5052 0 16 38 12066 0 7 99 410147 3164:30 PM 0 15 15 12042 0 22 36 2060 0 5 30 9044 0 2 92 330127 2734:45 PM 0 14 17 9040 0 19 34 2055 0 9 26 17052 0 3 117 480168 315Hourly Total 0 60 66 460172 0 72 137 100219 0 33 137 540224 0 16 409 1570582 11975:00 PM 0 16 9 7032 0 14 32 4050 0 12 37 15064 0 4 93 310128 2745:15 PM 0 23 32 7062 0 16 40 4060 0 7 37 18062 0 3 113 360152 3365:30 PM 0 17 23 9049 0 15 22 1038 0 6 29 11046 0 2 99 390140 2735:45 PM 0 12 16 8036 0 14 26 3043 0 4 28 13045 0 4 67 26097 221Hourly Total 0 68 80 310179 0 59 120 120191 0 29 131 570217 0 13 372 1320517 1104Grand Total 0 565 639 26301467 0 360 572 500982 0 173 1376 37001919 0 52 1516 58802156 6524Approach % 0.0 38.5 43.6 17.9-- 0.0 36.7 58.2 5.1-- 0.0 9.0 71.7 19.3-- 0.0 2.4 70.3 27.3-- -Total % 0.0 8.7 9.8 4.0-22.5 0.0 5.5 8.8 0.8-15.1 0.0 2.7 21.1 5.7-29.4 0.0 0.8 23.2 9.0-33.0 -Lights0 558 624 225-1407 0 264 549 50-863 0 151 1360 268-1779 0 51 1497 585-2133 6182DRAFT % Lights- 98.8 97.7 85.6-95.9 - 73.3 96.0 100.0-87.9 - 87.3 98.8 72.4-92.7 - 98.1 98.7 99.5-98.9 94.8Buses0 0 3 6-9 0 4 3 0-7 0 1 1 8-10 0 0 2 0-2 28% Buses - 0.0 0.5 2.3-0.6 - 1.1 0.5 0.0-0.7 - 0.6 0.1 2.2-0.5 - 0.0 0.1 0.0-0.1 0.4Single-Unit Trucks 0 6 10 3-19 0 28 14 0-42 0 5 8 33-46 0 1 13 3-17 124% Single-UnitTrucks- 1.1 1.6 1.1-1.3 - 7.8 2.4 0.0-4.3 - 2.9 0.6 8.9-2.4 - 1.9 0.9 0.5-0.8 1.9Articulated Trucks 0 1 2 29-32 0 64 6 0-70 0 16 7 61-84 0 0 4 0-4 190% ArticulatedTrucks- 0.2 0.3 11.0-2.2 - 17.8 1.0 0.0-7.1 - 9.2 0.5 16.5-4.4 - 0.0 0.3 0.0-0.2 2.9Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0% Bicycles onRoad- 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Pedestrians - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- -% Pedestrians - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- -DRAFT Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc.9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018(847)518-9990 mmendoza@kloainc.comCount Name:Galena+Road+with+Eldamain+Road TMCSite Code:Start Date: 03/03/2026Page No: 3Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (6:30 AM)Start TimeGalena rdGalena rdeldamain rdeldamain rdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalInt. Total6:30 AM 0 28 52 14094 0 16 19 3038 0 1 92 140107 0 1 47 10058 2976:45 AM 0 39 34 14087 0 11 16 3030 0 2 95 130110 0 1 29 20050 2777:00 AM 0 41 28 4073 0 19 18 4041 0 11 101 150127 0 1 21 15037 2787:15 AM 0 35 38 12085 0 8 16 2026 0 3 113 150131 0 0 34 20054 296Total0 143 152 440339 0 54 69 120135 0 17 401 570475 0 3 131 650199 1148Approach % 0.0 42.2 44.8 13.0-- 0.0 40.0 51.1 8.9-- 0.0 3.6 84.4 12.0-- 0.0 1.5 65.8 32.7-- -Total % 0.0 12.5 13.2 3.8-29.5 0.0 4.7 6.0 1.0-11.8 0.0 1.5 34.9 5.0-41.4 0.0 0.3 11.4 5.7-17.3 -PHF 0.000 0.872 0.731 0.786-0.902 0.000 0.711 0.908 0.750-0.823 0.000 0.386 0.887 0.950-0.906 0.000 0.750 0.697 0.813-0.858 0.966Lights0 142 148 37-327 0 35 64 12-111 0 14 399 43-456 0 3 127 65-195 1089% Lights- 99.3 97.4 84.1-96.5 - 64.8 92.8 100.0-82.2 - 82.4 99.5 75.4-96.0 - 100.0 96.9 100.0-98.0 94.9Buses0 0 0 2-2 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 2-2 0 0 0 0-0 4% Buses - 0.0 0.0 4.5-0.6 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 3.5-0.4 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.3Single-Unit Trucks 0 1 4 0-5 0 6 4 0-10 0 1 0 4-5 0 0 2 0-2 22% Single-UnitTrucks- 0.7 2.6 0.0-1.5 - 11.1 5.8 0.0-7.4 - 5.9 0.0 7.0-1.1 - 0.0 1.5 0.0-1.0 1.9Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 5-5 0 13 1 0-14 0 2 2 8-12 0 0 2 0-2 33% ArticulatedTrucks- 0.0 0.0 11.4-1.5 - 24.1 1.4 0.0-10.4 - 11.8 0.5 14.0-2.5 - 0.0 1.5 0.0-1.0 2.9Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0% Bicycles onRoad- 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Pedestrians - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- -% Pedestrians - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- -DRAFT Kenig Lindgren O'Hara Aboona, Inc.9575 W. Higgins Rd., Suite 400Rosemont, Illinois, United States 60018(847)518-9990 mmendoza@kloainc.comCount Name:Galena+Road+with+Eldamain+Road TMCSite Code:Start Date: 03/03/2026Page No: 4Turning Movement Peak Hour Data (3:15 PM)Start TimeGalena rdGalena rdeldamain rdeldamain rdEastboundWestboundNorthboundSouthboundU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalU-Turn Left Thru Right PedsApp.TotalInt. Total3:15 PM 0 20 29 13062 0 24 33 0057 0 11 43 18072 0 7 107 310145 3363:30 PM 0 16 28 12056 0 20 25 1046 0 12 48 27087 0 1 102 230126 3153:45 PM 0 14 24 18056 0 27 38 2067 0 15 34 20069 0 3 102 680173 3654:00 PM 0 13 15 11039 0 18 33 1052 0 3 43 16062 0 4 101 350140 293Total0 63 96 540213 0 89 129 40222 0 41 168 810290 0 15 412 1570584 1309Approach % 0.0 29.6 45.1 25.4-- 0.0 40.1 58.1 1.8-- 0.0 14.1 57.9 27.9-- 0.0 2.6 70.5 26.9-- -Total % 0.0 4.8 7.3 4.1-16.3 0.0 6.8 9.9 0.3-17.0 0.0 3.1 12.8 6.2-22.2 0.0 1.1 31.5 12.0-44.6 -PHF 0.000 0.788 0.828 0.750-0.859 0.000 0.824 0.849 0.500-0.828 0.000 0.683 0.875 0.750-0.833 0.000 0.536 0.963 0.577-0.844 0.897Lights0 62 95 49-206 0 76 125 4-205 0 35 165 67-267 0 14 407 157-578 1256% Lights- 98.4 99.0 90.7-96.7 - 85.4 96.9 100.0-92.3 - 85.4 98.2 82.7-92.1 - 93.3 98.8 100.0-99.0 96.0Buses0 0 0 2-2 0 1 0 0-1 0 1 0 2-3 0 0 1 0-1 7% Buses - 0.0 0.0 3.7-0.9 - 1.1 0.0 0.0-0.5 - 2.4 0.0 2.5-1.0 - 0.0 0.2 0.0-0.2 0.5Single-Unit Trucks 0 1 1 0-2 0 2 3 0-5 0 1 2 7-10 0 1 4 0-5 22% Single-UnitTrucks- 1.6 1.0 0.0-0.9 - 2.2 2.3 0.0-2.3 - 2.4 1.2 8.6-3.4 - 6.7 1.0 0.0-0.9 1.7Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 3-3 0 10 1 0-11 0 4 1 5-10 0 0 0 0-0 24% ArticulatedTrucks- 0.0 0.0 5.6-1.4 - 11.2 0.8 0.0-5.0 - 9.8 0.6 6.2-3.4 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 1.8Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0% Bicycles onRoad- 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0-0.0 0.0Pedestrians - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- - - - -0- -% Pedestrians - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- - - - --- -DRAFT Site Plan DRAFT R50' R50' R50' R50'R50' R70'R70' R70' R70'R70' R25' R70' R100' R70' R70' 12' 30' 30' 12' 12' 30' 12' 18'30'30' 12' 30'30' 18' 18'18' 30'30'12'ELDAMAIN ROADBNSF RAI L W A Y C O M P A N Y FAXON ROAD BEECHER ROADPROPOSED BLDG 11A FF = 659.20 PROPOSED BLDG 11B FF = 658.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11C FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11D FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11E FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11F FF = 654.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11G FF = 651.70 PROPOSED BLDG 11H FF = 650.7030'12'30'12'30'12'12'30'12'30'12'30'12'30'30'30'12'30' 12' 30' 12' 30'30' 18' 18'18' 30' STORMWATER BASIN 1 STORMWATER BASIN 2 STORM WATER BASIN 3 STORMWATER BASIN 4 STORMWATER BASIN 7 STORMWATER BASIN 6 STORMWATER BASIN 550' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK 50' BUILDING SETBACK SECURITY FENCE (TYP.) 30' PROPOSED TEMP. EASEMENT 20' UTILITY EASEMENT 60' BUILDING SETBACK 40' R.O.W. DEDICATION30' PROPOSED TEMP. EASEMENT 20' UTILITY EASEMENT 150' BUILDING SETBACK 75' R.O.W. DEDICATION 30' PROPOSED TEMP. EASEMENT 20' UTILITY EASEMENT 50' BUILDING SETBACK 150' UTILITY EASEMENT 60' R.O.W. DEDICATION PROPOSED GATED EMERGENCY ACCESS ELDAMAIN RD CENTERLINE 100' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 100' LANDSCAPE BUFFER OPEN SPACE / UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED GATED EMERGENCY ACCESS BEECHER ROAD CENTERLINE 100' LANDSCAPE BUFFER SECURITY FENCE (TYP.)© COPYRIGHT 2025SHEET PEG JOB No.PEG PMSTART DATESCALEPINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP PINNACLE ENGINEERING GROUP www.pinnacle-engr.comCHICAGO OFFICE: 1051 E. MAIN ST. | SUITE 217 EAST DUNDEE, IL 60118 (847) 551-5300ENGINEERING I NATURAL RESOURCES I SURVEYING PLAN I DESIGN I DELIVER CHICAGO I MILWAUKEE : NATIONWIDE w w w .p i n n a c l e -e n g r .c o m REVISIONS IL DESIGN FIRM 184.006289-0010 WEST COMPLEX CONCEPT SITE PLAN C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CAMPUS - WEST COMPLEX CONCEPT SITE PLAN6097.00-ILBDJ03/12/261"=200'C-3 C-10YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 1" = 200'0 400' GRAPHICAL SCALE (FEET) NORTH WEST COMPLEX SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA ±9,972,190.80 SF (±228.93 AC) MAX BUILDING HEIGHT 70' INCLUDING ROOF TOP UNITS FOR BUILDINGS WITHIN 1,500' OF A RESIDENCE SETBACKS FRONT (WEST) REQUIRED 25' FRONT (WEST) PROVIDED 150' REAR (EAST) REQUIRED 0' REAR (EAST) PROVIDED 60' SIDE (NORTH & SOUTH) REQUIRED 20' SIDE (NORTH & SOUTH) PROVIDED 50' TRANSITIONAL SIDE N/A *SETBACKS APPLY ONLY TO THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PROPERTY IS RESUBDIVIDED. THERE SHALL BE NO SETBACKS APPLICABLE TO THE INTERNAL LOT LINES. *NO BUILDING WITHIN 500' OF EXISTING RESIDENCE BUILDING DATA BLDG #* SIZE PARKING REQUIRED PARKING PROVIDED LOADING BERTH PROVIDED HEIGHT (TOP OF BLDG) HEIGHT (TOP OF EQPT.) BLDG A 246,387 SF 50 51 4 26'-0"47'-5" BLDG B 129,350 SF 26 51 2 26'-0"47'-5" BLDG C 246,387 SF 50 51 4 26'-0"47'-5" BLDG D 246,387 SF 50 80 4 26'-0"47'-5" BLDG E 246,387 SF 50 51 4 26'-0"47'-5" BLDG F 246,387 SF 50 51 4 26'-0"47'-5" BLDG G 246,387 SF 50 51 4 26'-0"47'-5" BLDG H 246,387 SF 50 51 4 26'-0"47'-5" TOTAL 1,854,805 SF 426 488 34 N/A N/A * INCLUDES 16,673 SF 2ND FLOOR OFFICE SPACE PARKING DATA CENTER PARKING RATIO 0.2 SPACES PER 1,000 SF REQUIRED PARKING (# SPACES)376 PROVIDED PARKING (# SPACES)466 ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED (# SPACES)8 ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED (# SPACES)16 COVERAGE MINIMUM LOT SIZE N/A MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 85.0% PROVIDED BUILDING COVERAGE 18.6% MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE 85.0% PROVIDED SITE COVERAGE 50.3% MAXIMUM FAR 85.0% PROVIDED FAR 20.0% C1-YORKVILLE DATA CENTER CAMPUSDRAFT CMAP 2050 Projections Letter DRAFT February 16, 2024 Ryan May Project Coordinator Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara and Aboona, Inc. 9575 West Higgins Road Suite 400 Rosemont, IL 60018 Subject: Eldamain Road from Galena Road to US 34 IDOT Dear Ms. May: In response to a request made on your behalf and dated February 15, 2024, we have developed year 2050 average daily traffic (ADT) projections for the subject location. ROAD SEGMENT Current ADT Year 2050 ADT Eldamain Rd north of Galena Rd 6,300 8,000 Eldamain Rd south of Galena Rd 7,300 9,300 Galena Rd east of Eldamain Rd 6,200 8,600 Galena Rd west of Eldamain Rd 6,800 9,400 Corneils Rd at Eldamain Rd 1,300 2,200 Eldamain Rd at Faxon Rd 7,900 10,500 Faxon Rd at Eldamain Rd 700 1,200 IL 34 east of Eldamain Rd 17,900 26,300 IL 34 west of Eldamain Rd 15,000 22,100 Traffic projections are developed using existing ADT data provided in the request letter and the results from the December 2023 CMAP Travel Demand Analysis. The regional travel model uses CMAP 2050 socioeconomic projections and assumes the implementation of the ON TO 2050 Comprehensive Regional Plan for the Northeastern Illinois area. The provision of this data in support of your request does not constitute a CMAP endorsement of the proposed development or any subsequent developments. If you have any questions, please call me at (312) 386-8806 or email me at jrodriguez@cmap.illinois.gov Jose Rodriguez, PTP, AICP Senior Planner, Research & Analysis Cc: Rios (IDOT) \2024_TrafficForecasts\Yorkville\ke-02-24\ke-02-24.docxDRAFT Data Center Traffic Assignment (Figure A) DRAFT SITE 47 1 (1)30 (7)11 (27) 1 (1)2 (0)6 (2)2 (6) 2 (6)6 (1)12 (3) 18 (4)4 (12)7 (15)2 (0 )10 (2)4 (8) 3 (7)8 (2)Figure: A Kenig,Lindgren,O'Hara,Aboona,Inc. Job No: 25-214 Site-Generated Traffic VolumesYorkville, Illinois Data Center N NOT TO SCALE ROAD CORNEILS ROAD FAXONROADBEECHERROADELDAMAIN LEGEND 00 (00) - AM PEAK HOUR (6:30-7:30 AM) - PM PEAK HOUR (4:15-5:15 PM)STREETBRIDGEAMTRAK AND BNSF RAILROADS DRAFT Level of Service Criteria DRAFT LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA Signalized Intersections Level of Service Interpretation Average Control Delay (seconds per vehicle) A Favorable progression. Most vehicles arrive during the green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping. 10 B Good progression, with more vehicles stopping than for Level of Service A. >10 - 20 C Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear. Number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping. >20 - 35 D The volume-to-capacity ratio is high and either progression is ineffective or the cycle length is too long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. >35 - 55 E Progression is unfavorable. The volume-to-capacity ratio is high and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. >55 - 80 F The volume-to-capacity ratio is very high, progression is very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. >80.0 Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Total Delay (SEC/VEH) A 0 - 10 B > 10 - 15 C > 15 - 25 D > 25 - 35 E > 35 - 50 F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition. DRAFT Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road 03/19/2026 EX AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 4:16 pm 06/19/2024 Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 143 152 44 54 69 12 17 405 57 3 131 65 Future Volume (vph) 143 152 44 54 69 12 17 405 57 3 131 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft)290 260 150 155 140 150 230 230 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft)190 180 170 200 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot)1787 1942 1392 1337 1869 1615 1530 1980 1292 1805 1845 1615 Flt Permitted 0.498 0.657 0.610 0.470 Satd. Flow (perm)937 1942 1392 925 1869 1615 982 1980 1292 893 1845 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)116 116 89 89 Link Speed (mph)30 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft)4330 3472 4586 3161 Travel Time (s)98.4 78.9 69.5 47.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles (%)1% 3% 16% 35% 7% 0% 18% 1% 25% 0% 3% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 147 157 45 56 71 12 18 418 59 3 135 67 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Protected Phases 745381523167 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 745381523167 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)11.0 24.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 Total Split (s)11.0 34.0 11.0 11.0 34.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 Total Split (%)13.8% 42.5% 13.8% 13.8% 42.5% 13.8% 13.8% 30.0% 13.8% 13.8% 30.0% 13.8% Yellow Time (s)3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All-Red Time (s)0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)3.5 6.0 3.5 5.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 5.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Max None None Max None Act Effct Green (s)18.3 10.0 18.8 12.2 9.3 15.2 30.3 28.3 37.0 28.5 24.6 38.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.18 0.34 0.22 0.17 0.27 0.55 0.51 0.67 0.52 0.44 0.70 v/c Ratio 0.31 0.45 0.08 0.23 0.23 0.02 0.03 0.41 0.07 0.01 0.16 0.06 Control Delay (s/veh) 13.8 26.6 0.3 16.1 23.3 0.1 9.0 16.3 1.5 9.0 17.6 1.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 13.8 26.6 0.3 16.1 23.3 0.1 9.0 16.3 1.5 9.0 17.6 1.8 LOS BCABCAABAABA Approach Delay (s/veh)17.8 18.4 14.3 12.3 Approach LOS BBBB Queue Length 50th (ft) 35 53 0 13 23 0 3 100 0 1 37 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 69 103 0 34 54 0 13 #267 10 4 83 12DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road 03/19/2026 EX AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 4:16 pm 06/19/2024 Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft)4250 3392 4506 3081 Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 260 150 155 140 150 230 230 Base Capacity (vph) 482 1020 586 247 982 582 617 1012 892 604 822 1159 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.30 0.15 0.08 0.23 0.07 0.02 0.03 0.41 0.07 0.00 0.16 0.06 Intersection Summary Area Type:Other Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 55.3 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.45 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 15.5 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.6%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 3403/19/2026 EX AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 4:16 pm 06/19/2024 Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 219 433 56 69 222 77 32 223 131 76 93 70 Future Volume (vph) 219 433 56 69 222 77 32 223 131 76 93 70 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft)300 215 200 300 215 215 330 250 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft)220 170 205 120 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 3689 1392 1480 3585 1429 1752 1869 1538 1543 1681 1482 Flt Permitted 0.523 0.446 0.690 0.534 Satd. Flow (perm)974 3689 1392 695 3585 1429 1273 1869 1538 867 1681 1482 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)93 93 146 78 Link Speed (mph)45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft)6798 4542 2076 4964 Travel Time (s)103.0 68.8 31.5 75.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%)2% 3% 16% 22% 6% 13% 3% 7% 5% 17% 19% 9% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 243 481 62 77 247 86 36 248 146 84 103 78 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Protected Phases 745381523167 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 745381523167 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)9.5 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 11.0 9.5 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s)18.0 47.0 11.0 18.0 47.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 18.0 11.0 24.0 18.0 Total Split (%)18.0% 47.0% 11.0% 18.0% 47.0% 11.0% 11.0% 24.0% 18.0% 11.0% 24.0% 18.0% Yellow Time (s)3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All-Red Time (s)0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)3.5 6.0 3.5 5.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 5.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Max None None Max None Act Effct Green (s)28.2 14.2 26.6 20.5 12.3 25.4 25.8 18.3 32.0 27.0 18.9 36.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.21 0.40 0.31 0.19 0.38 0.39 0.28 0.48 0.41 0.29 0.55 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.61 0.10 0.25 0.37 0.14 0.07 0.48 0.18 0.20 0.21 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.7 27.7 1.9 14.9 26.3 4.0 12.2 26.0 3.0 13.3 22.3 2.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 14.7 27.7 1.9 14.9 26.3 4.0 12.2 26.0 3.0 13.3 22.3 2.8 LOS BCABCABCABCA Approach Delay (s/veh)21.7 19.5 17.0 13.7 Approach LOS C B B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 64 97 0 19 48 0 8 88 0 19 33 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 109 146 12 43 83 23 26 172 29 50 79 19DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 3403/19/2026 EX AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 4:16 pm 06/19/2024 Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft)6718 4462 1996 4884 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 215 200 300 215 215 330 250 Base Capacity (vph) 616 2325 640 417 2260 619 566 517 927 433 480 921 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.21 0.10 0.18 0.11 0.14 0.06 0.48 0.16 0.19 0.21 0.08 Intersection Summary Area Type:Other Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 66.1 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.61 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 19.0 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.0%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 34 DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 2: Eldamain Road & Corneils Road 03/19/2026 EX AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 4:16 pm 06/19/2024 Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 21 0 20 0 459 33 12 217 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 21 0 20 0 459 33 12 217 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - 245 - - 205 - 215 200 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 000000020020 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 22 0 21 0 488 35 13 231 0 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 745 745 488 231 0 0 523 0 0 Stage 1 488 488 ------- Stage 2 256 256 ------- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45.5------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45.5------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 385 345 584 1349 - - 1053 - - Stage 1 621 553 ------- Stage 2 791 699 ------- Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 380 0 584 1349 - - 1053 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 380 0 ------- Stage 1 621 0 ------- Stage 2 781 0 ------- Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 13.28 0 0.44 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1349 - - 380 584 1053 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.059 0.036 0.012 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)0 - - 15.1 11.4 8.5 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.2 0.1 0 - -DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 3: Eldamain Road /Eldamain Road & Menards Access Drive 03/19/2026 EX AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 4:16 pm 06/19/2024 Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 31 106 484 157 81 Future Vol, veh/h 8 31 106 484 157 81 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 300 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 50 62 14 3 9 16 Mvmt Flow 9 34 115 526 171 88 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 971 215 259 0 - 0 Stage 1 215 ----- Stage 2 757 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.9 6.82 4.24 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 15.9----- Critical Hdwy Stg 25.9----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.95 3.858 2.326 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 230 696 1239 - - - Stage 1 720 ----- Stage 2 388 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 209 696 1239 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 307 ----- Stage 1 653 ----- Stage 2 388 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.8 1.47 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1239 - 307 696 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.093 - 0.028 0.048 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)8.2 - 17.1 10.4 - - HCM Lane LOS A - C B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - 0.1 0.2 - -DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 4: Eldamain Road & Faxon Road 03/19/2026 EX AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 4:16 pm 06/19/2024 Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 41 0 7 0 0 1 4 548 0 0 178 10 Future Vol, veh/h 41 0 7 0 0 1 4 548 0 0 178 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 50 -----170--40-- Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 001400006002010 Mvmt Flow 43 0 7 0 0 1 4 577 0 0 187 11 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 778 778 193 773 783 577 198 0 0 577 0 0 Stage 1 193 193 - 585 585 ------- Stage 2 585 585 - 187 198 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.34 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 16.15.5-6.15.5------- Critical Hdwy Stg 26.15.5-6.15.5------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.426 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 316 330 819 319 328 520 1387 - - 1007 - - Stage 1 814 745 - 500 501 ------- Stage 2 500 501 - 819 741 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 315 329 819 315 327 520 1387 - - 1007 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 409 410 - 410 409 ------- Stage 1 814 745 - 499 499 ------- Stage 2 498 499 - 812 741 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 14.04 11.94 0.06 0 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1387 - - 409 819 520 1007 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.105 0.009 0.002 - - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)7.6 - - 14.8 9.4 11.9 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A - -BABA - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0--0.4000--DRAFT Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road 03/19/2026 EX PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 1:17 pm 06/26/2024 Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)63 96 56 91 129 4 43 187 86 15 423 157 Future Volume (vph)63 96 56 91 129 4 43 187 86 15 423 157 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft)290 260 150 155 140 150 230 230 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft)190 180 170 200 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1980 1482 1570 1942 1615 1570 1961 1380 1687 1980 1615 Flt Permitted 0.520 0.688 0.320 0.628 Satd. Flow (perm)969 1980 1482 1137 1942 1615 529 1961 1380 1115 1980 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)83 83 96 174 Link Speed (mph)30 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft)4330 3472 4491 3161 Travel Time (s)98.4 78.9 68.0 47.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%)2% 1% 9% 15% 3% 0% 15% 2% 17% 7% 1% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 70 107 62 101 143 4 48 208 96 17 470 174 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Protected Phases 745381523167 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 745381523167 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s)10.0 34.5 10.0 10.0 34.5 9.5 10.0 31.0 10.0 9.5 30.5 10.0 Total Split (%)11.8% 40.6% 11.8% 11.8% 40.6% 11.2% 11.8% 36.5% 11.8% 11.2% 35.9% 11.8% Yellow Time (s)3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All-Red Time (s)0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Max None None Max None Act Effct Green (s)17.3 9.9 22.4 16.6 10.1 18.6 34.8 29.8 42.5 32.8 25.9 40.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.16 0.36 0.26 0.16 0.30 0.55 0.47 0.67 0.52 0.41 0.64 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.35 0.11 0.29 0.46 0.01 0.12 0.22 0.10 0.03 0.58 0.16 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.3 28.3 3.1 17.8 30.7 0.0 8.4 13.8 2.3 7.8 20.8 2.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 16.3 28.3 3.1 17.8 30.7 0.0 8.4 13.8 2.3 7.8 20.8 2.0 LOS BCABCAABAACA Approach Delay (s/veh)18.2 25.0 9.9 15.5 Approach LOS B C A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 40 0 29 54 0 8 42 0 3 155 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 44 81 16 60 103 0 24 113 19 12 270 25DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road 03/19/2026 EX PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 1:17 pm 06/26/2024 Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft)4250 3392 4411 3081 Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 260 150 155 140 150 230 230 Base Capacity (vph) 358 920 588 348 903 542 402 928 965 639 814 1095 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.12 0.11 0.29 0.16 0.01 0.12 0.22 0.10 0.03 0.58 0.16 Intersection Summary Area Type:Other Cycle Length: 85 Actuated Cycle Length: 63 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.58 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 16.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.6%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 3403/19/2026 EX PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 1:17 pm 06/26/2024 Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 162 531 47 189 636 54 65 136 124 131 241 217 Future Volume (vph) 162 531 47 189 636 54 65 136 124 131 241 217 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft)300 215 200 300 215 215 330 250 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft)220 170 205 120 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 3725 1524 1770 3762 1429 1770 1695 1568 1671 1961 1553 Flt Permitted 0.173 0.249 0.590 0.615 Satd. Flow (perm)322 3725 1524 464 3762 1429 1099 1695 1568 1082 1961 1553 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)53 57 131 228 Link Speed (mph)45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft)6798 4542 2076 4992 Travel Time (s)103.0 68.8 31.5 75.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%)2% 2% 6% 2% 1% 13% 2% 18% 3% 8% 2% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 171 559 49 199 669 57 68 143 131 138 254 228 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Protected Phases 745381523167 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 745381523167 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s)23.0 49.0 16.0 21.0 47.0 16.0 16.0 47.0 21.0 16.0 47.0 23.0 Total Split (%)17.3% 36.8% 12.0% 15.8% 35.3% 12.0% 12.0% 35.3% 15.8% 12.0% 35.3% 17.3% Yellow Time (s)3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All-Red Time (s)0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Max None None Max None Act Effct Green (s)40.0 24.6 38.4 41.1 25.2 41.2 51.7 41.4 60.9 56.7 45.8 64.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.23 0.35 0.38 0.23 0.38 0.48 0.38 0.56 0.52 0.42 0.60 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.66 0.09 0.59 0.77 0.10 0.12 0.22 0.14 0.22 0.31 0.22 Control Delay (s/veh) 29.8 42.5 6.0 28.9 45.7 6.0 15.5 26.5 2.8 15.9 25.2 2.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 29.8 42.5 6.0 28.9 45.7 6.0 15.5 26.5 2.8 15.9 25.2 2.3 LOS CDACDABCABCA Approach Delay (s/veh)37.4 39.6 15.3 14.7 Approach LOS D D B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 77 186 0 91 229 0 22 67 0 47 119 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 127 260 23 147 316 26 56 138 31 102 226 37DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 3403/19/2026 EX PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 1:17 pm 06/26/2024 Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft)6718 4462 1996 4912 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 215 200 300 215 215 330 250 Base Capacity (vph) 392 1489 639 397 1434 610 645 646 992 638 827 1101 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.44 0.38 0.08 0.50 0.47 0.09 0.11 0.22 0.13 0.22 0.31 0.21 Intersection Summary Area Type:Other Cycle Length: 133 Actuated Cycle Length: 108.6 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.77 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 30.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.6%ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 34 DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 2: Eldamain Road & Corneils Road 03/19/2026 EX PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 1:17 pm 06/26/2024 Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 40 0 29 0 287 24 38 532 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 40 0 29 0 287 24 38 532 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - 245 - - 205 - 215 200 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0000012040040 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 43 0 31 0 305 26 40 566 0 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 952 952 305 566 0 0 331 0 0 Stage 1 305 305 ------- Stage 2 647 647 ------- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 6.32 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45.5------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45.5------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.408 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 290 261 712 1016 - - 1240 - - Stage 1 752 666 ------- Stage 2 525 470 ------- Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 281 0 712 1016 - - 1240 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 281 0 ------- Stage 1 752 0 ------- Stage 2 508 0 ------- Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 15.98 0 0.53 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1016 - - 281 712 1240 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.152 0.043 0.033 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)0 - - 20.1 10.3 8 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.5 0.1 0.1 - -DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 3: Eldamain Road /Eldamain Road & Menards Access Drive 03/19/2026 EX PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 1:17 pm 06/26/2024 Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 118 187 178 193 481 91 Future Vol, veh/h 118 187 178 193 481 91 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 300 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 9 14 9 4 9 Mvmt Flow 137 217 207 224 559 106 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1251 612 665 0 - 0 Stage 1 612 ----- Stage 2 638 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.46 6.29 4.24 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 15.46----- Critical Hdwy Stg 25.46----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.554 3.381 2.326 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 187 480 870 - - - Stage 1 533 ----- Stage 2 519 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 143 480 870 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 272 ----- Stage 1 406 ----- Stage 2 519 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 23.38 5 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)870 - 272 480 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.238 - 0.505 0.453 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)10.4 - 31 18.5 - - HCM Lane LOS B - D C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 - 2.6 2.3 - -DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 4: Eldamain Road & Faxon Road 03/19/2026 EX PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 1:17 pm 06/26/2024 Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 31 0 3 1 1 1 7 339 4 3 632 33 Future Vol, veh/h 31 0 3 1 1 1 7 339 4 3 632 33 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 50 -----170--40-- Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 12 25 33 5 3 Mvmt Flow 34 0 3 1 1 1 8 368 4 3 687 36 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1096 1099 705 1079 1115 371 723 0 0 373 0 0 Stage 1 711 711 - 386 386 ------- Stage 2 384 388 - 693 729 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.39 - - 4.43 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 16.15.5-6.15.5------- Critical Hdwy Stg 26.15.5-6.15.5------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.461 - - 2.497 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 193 214 440 198 210 680 768 - - 1034 - - Stage 1 427 439 - 642 614 ------- Stage 2 643 612 - 437 431 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 189 211 440 194 207 680 768 - - 1034 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 313 324 - 315 317 ------- Stage 1 426 438 - 635 608 ------- Stage 2 634 606 - 432 430 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 17.47 14.44 0.19 0.04 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)768 - - 313 440 384 1034 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.108 0.007 0.008 0.003 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)9.7 - - 17.9 13.2 14.4 8.5 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C B B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0--0.4000--DRAFT Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Year 2031 No-Build Weekday Morning Peak Hour DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road 03/19/2026 NB AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 8:54 am 03/19/2026 No-Build Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 153 163 47 58 74 13 18 435 61 3 146 70 Future Volume (vph) 153 163 47 58 74 13 18 435 61 3 146 70 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft)290 260 150 155 140 150 230 230 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft)190 180 170 200 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot)1787 1942 1392 1337 1869 1615 1530 1980 1292 1805 1845 1615 Flt Permitted 0.495 0.651 0.601 0.434 Satd. Flow (perm)931 1942 1392 916 1869 1615 968 1980 1292 825 1845 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)116 116 89 89 Link Speed (mph)30 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft)4330 3472 4586 3161 Travel Time (s)98.4 78.9 69.5 47.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles (%)1% 3% 16% 35% 7% 0% 18% 1% 25% 0% 3% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 158 168 48 60 76 13 19 448 63 3 151 72 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Protected Phases 745381523167 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 745381523167 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)11.0 24.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 Total Split (s)11.0 34.0 11.0 11.0 34.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 Total Split (%)13.8% 42.5% 13.8% 13.8% 42.5% 13.8% 13.8% 30.0% 13.8% 13.8% 30.0% 13.8% Yellow Time (s)3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All-Red Time (s)0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)3.5 6.0 3.5 5.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 5.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Max None None Max None Act Effct Green (s)18.6 10.3 19.1 12.5 9.6 15.5 30.3 28.3 37.0 28.5 24.7 38.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.19 0.34 0.22 0.17 0.28 0.54 0.51 0.67 0.51 0.44 0.70 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.47 0.09 0.24 0.24 0.02 0.03 0.44 0.07 0.01 0.18 0.06 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.0 26.7 0.3 16.3 23.3 0.1 9.2 17.4 1.7 9.0 18.0 2.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 14.0 26.7 0.3 16.3 23.3 0.1 9.2 17.4 1.7 9.0 18.0 2.1 LOS BCABCAABAABA Approach Delay (s/veh)17.9 18.4 15.3 12.8 Approach LOS BBBB Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 57 0 14 25 0 3 111 0 1 42 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 73 109 1 36 57 0 14 #301 12 5 92 14DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road 03/19/2026 NB AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 8:54 am 03/19/2026 No-Build Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft)4250 3392 4506 3081 Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 260 150 155 140 150 230 230 Base Capacity (vph) 486 1018 591 249 980 587 609 1008 889 575 818 1155 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.17 0.08 0.24 0.08 0.02 0.03 0.44 0.07 0.01 0.18 0.06 Intersection Summary Area Type:Other Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 55.6 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.47 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 16.0 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.7%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 3403/19/2026 NB AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 8:54 am 03/19/2026 No-Build Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 234 463 60 74 238 82 34 245 140 81 102 75 Future Volume (vph) 234 463 60 74 238 82 34 245 140 81 102 75 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft)300 215 200 300 215 215 330 250 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft)220 170 205 120 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 3689 1392 1480 3585 1429 1752 1869 1538 1543 1681 1482 Flt Permitted 0.507 0.419 0.684 0.485 Satd. Flow (perm)944 3689 1392 653 3585 1429 1262 1869 1538 788 1681 1482 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)93 93 156 83 Link Speed (mph)45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft)6798 4542 2076 4964 Travel Time (s)103.0 68.8 31.5 75.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%)2% 3% 16% 22% 6% 13% 3% 7% 5% 17% 19% 9% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 260 514 67 82 264 91 38 272 156 90 113 83 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Protected Phases 745381523167 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 745381523167 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)9.5 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 11.0 9.5 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s)18.0 47.0 11.0 18.0 47.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 18.0 11.0 24.0 18.0 Total Split (%)18.0% 47.0% 11.0% 18.0% 47.0% 11.0% 11.0% 24.0% 18.0% 11.0% 24.0% 18.0% Yellow Time (s)3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All-Red Time (s)0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)3.5 6.0 3.5 5.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 5.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Max None None Max None Act Effct Green (s)29.5 15.0 27.6 21.3 13.0 26.2 25.9 18.3 32.2 27.0 18.9 36.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.22 0.41 0.32 0.19 0.39 0.39 0.27 0.48 0.40 0.28 0.55 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.62 0.11 0.27 0.38 0.15 0.07 0.53 0.19 0.23 0.24 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.9 27.8 2.2 15.0 26.3 4.2 12.8 27.7 3.1 14.2 23.3 2.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 14.9 27.8 2.2 15.0 26.3 4.2 12.8 27.7 3.1 14.2 23.3 2.9 LOS BCABCABCABCA Approach Delay (s/veh)21.8 19.6 18.3 14.5 Approach LOS C B B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 69 105 0 21 52 0 9 99 0 21 37 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 116 157 13 45 87 25 28 193 30 54 88 20DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 3403/19/2026 NB AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 8:54 am 03/19/2026 No-Build Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft)6718 4462 1996 4884 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 215 200 300 215 215 330 250 Base Capacity (vph) 613 2291 649 410 2226 624 554 509 920 403 472 910 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.42 0.22 0.10 0.20 0.12 0.15 0.07 0.53 0.17 0.22 0.24 0.09 Intersection Summary Area Type:Other Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 67.2 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.62 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 19.5 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.6%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 34 DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 2: Eldamain Road & Corneils Road 03/19/2026 NB AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 8:54 am 03/19/2026 No-Build Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 0 23 0 491 41 19 232 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 24 0 23 0 491 41 19 232 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - 245 - - 205 - 215 200 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 000000020020 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 26 0 24 0 522 44 20 247 0 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 810 810 522 247 0 0 566 0 0 Stage 1 522 522 ------- Stage 2 287 287 ------- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45.5------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45.5------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 352 316 558 1331 - - 1016 - - Stage 1 599 534 ------- Stage 2 766 678 ------- Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 345 0 558 1331 - - 1016 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 345 0 ------- Stage 1 599 0 ------- Stage 2 751 0 ------- Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 14.05 0 0.65 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1331 - - 345 558 1016 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.074 0.044 0.02 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)0 - - 16.3 11.7 8.6 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.2 0.1 0.1 - -DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 3: Eldamain Road /Eldamain Road & Menards Access Drive 03/19/2026 NB AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 8:54 am 03/19/2026 No-Build Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 33 113 524 170 87 Future Vol, veh/h 9 33 113 524 170 87 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 300 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 50 62 14 3 9 16 Mvmt Flow 10 36 123 570 185 95 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1047 232 279 0 - 0 Stage 1 232 ----- Stage 2 815 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.9 6.82 4.24 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 15.9----- Critical Hdwy Stg 25.9----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.95 3.858 2.326 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 206 679 1217 - - - Stage 1 706 ----- Stage 2 363 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 185 679 1217 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 285 ----- Stage 1 635 ----- Stage 2 363 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 12.2 1.47 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1217 - 285 679 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.101 - 0.034 0.053 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)8.3 - 18.1 10.6 - - HCM Lane LOS A - C B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - 0.1 0.2 - -DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 4: Eldamain Road & Faxon Road 03/19/2026 NB AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 8:54 am 03/19/2026 No-Build Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 0 7 0 0 1 4 592 0 0 192 11 Future Vol, veh/h 44 0 7 0 0 1 4 592 0 0 192 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 50 -----170--40-- Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 001400006002010 Mvmt Flow 46 0 7 0 0 1 4 623 0 0 202 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 839 839 208 834 845 623 214 0 0 623 0 0 Stage 1 208 208 - 632 632 ------- Stage 2 632 632 - 202 214 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.34 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 16.15.5-6.15.5------- Critical Hdwy Stg 26.15.5-6.15.5------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.426 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 287 304 803 290 302 490 1368 - - 968 - - Stage 1 799 734 - 472 477 ------- Stage 2 472 477 - 804 729 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 286 303 803 286 301 490 1368 - - 968 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 384 389 - 385 388 ------- Stage 1 799 734 - 471 476 ------- Stage 2 470 476 - 797 729 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 14.8 12.37 0.05 0 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1368 - - 384 803 490 968 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.12 0.009 0.002 - - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)7.6 - - 15.6 9.5 12.4 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C A B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0--0.4000--DRAFT Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Year 2031 No-Build Weekday Evening Peak Hour DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road 03/19/2026 NB PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 8:54 am 03/19/2026 No-Build Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)67 103 60 97 138 4 46 206 92 16 455 168 Future Volume (vph)67 103 60 97 138 4 46 206 92 16 455 168 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft)290 260 150 155 140 150 230 230 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft)190 180 170 200 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1980 1482 1570 1942 1615 1570 1961 1380 1687 1980 1615 Flt Permitted 0.510 0.684 0.283 0.616 Satd. Flow (perm)950 1980 1482 1130 1942 1615 468 1961 1380 1094 1980 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)83 83 102 187 Link Speed (mph)30 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft)4330 3472 4491 3161 Travel Time (s)98.4 78.9 68.0 47.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%)2% 1% 9% 15% 3% 0% 15% 2% 17% 7% 1% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 74 114 67 108 153 4 51 229 102 18 506 187 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Protected Phases 745381523167 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 745381523167 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s)10.0 34.5 10.0 10.0 34.5 9.5 10.0 31.0 10.0 9.5 30.5 10.0 Total Split (%)11.8% 40.6% 11.8% 11.8% 40.6% 11.2% 11.8% 36.5% 11.8% 11.2% 35.9% 11.8% Yellow Time (s)3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All-Red Time (s)0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Max None None Max None Act Effct Green (s)17.7 10.2 22.8 16.9 10.4 18.8 34.3 29.4 42.1 32.4 25.5 40.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.16 0.36 0.27 0.17 0.30 0.55 0.47 0.67 0.52 0.41 0.64 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.35 0.11 0.31 0.48 0.01 0.14 0.25 0.11 0.03 0.63 0.17 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.4 28.2 3.5 18.0 30.8 0.0 8.7 14.2 2.3 8.0 22.5 2.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 16.4 28.2 3.5 18.0 30.8 0.0 8.7 14.2 2.3 8.0 22.5 2.0 LOS BCABCAABAACA Approach Delay (s/veh)18.3 25.1 10.3 16.7 Approach LOS B C B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 42 0 31 58 0 9 48 0 3 172 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 85 18 63 109 0 26 124 20 12 #305 26DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road 03/19/2026 NB PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 8:54 am 03/19/2026 No-Build Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft)4250 3392 4411 3081 Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 260 150 155 140 150 230 230 Base Capacity (vph) 362 927 598 353 909 548 373 916 961 623 802 1096 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.12 0.11 0.31 0.17 0.01 0.14 0.25 0.11 0.03 0.63 0.17 Intersection Summary Area Type:Other Cycle Length: 85 Actuated Cycle Length: 62.9 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.63 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 16.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.7%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 3403/19/2026 NB PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 8:54 am 03/19/2026 No-Build Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 173 568 50 202 681 58 70 147 133 140 264 232 Future Volume (vph) 173 568 50 202 681 58 70 147 133 140 264 232 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft)300 215 200 300 215 215 330 250 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft)220 170 205 120 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 3725 1524 1770 3762 1429 1770 1695 1568 1671 1961 1553 Flt Permitted 0.151 0.230 0.555 0.600 Satd. Flow (perm)281 3725 1524 428 3762 1429 1034 1695 1568 1056 1961 1553 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)53 61 140 220 Link Speed (mph)45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft)6798 4542 2076 4992 Travel Time (s)103.0 68.8 31.5 75.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%)2% 2% 6% 2% 1% 13% 2% 18% 3% 8% 2% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 182 598 53 213 717 61 74 155 140 147 278 244 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Protected Phases 745381523167 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 745381523167 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s)23.0 49.0 16.0 21.0 47.0 16.0 16.0 47.0 21.0 16.0 47.0 23.0 Total Split (%)17.3% 36.8% 12.0% 15.8% 35.3% 12.0% 12.0% 35.3% 15.8% 12.0% 35.3% 17.3% Yellow Time (s)3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All-Red Time (s)0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Max None None Max None Act Effct Green (s)42.8 26.8 40.9 43.6 27.2 43.5 52.0 41.4 61.4 57.0 45.9 65.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.24 0.37 0.39 0.24 0.39 0.47 0.37 0.55 0.51 0.41 0.59 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.67 0.09 0.64 0.78 0.10 0.14 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.34 0.24 Control Delay (s/veh) 31.6 42.5 6.3 30.3 46.3 5.8 16.8 28.4 3.0 17.3 27.3 3.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 31.6 42.5 6.3 30.3 46.3 5.8 16.8 28.4 3.0 17.3 27.3 3.2 LOS CDACDABCABCA Approach Delay (s/veh)37.8 40.4 16.4 16.3 Approach LOS D D B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 83 205 0 99 253 0 26 76 0 53 139 7 Queue Length 95th (ft) 135 279 25 156 344 26 62 155 33 114 260 50DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 3403/19/2026 NB PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 8:54 am 03/19/2026 No-Build Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft)6718 4462 1996 4912 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 215 200 300 215 215 330 250 Base Capacity (vph) 379 1450 652 387 1396 623 603 629 973 613 806 1076 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.41 0.08 0.55 0.51 0.10 0.12 0.25 0.14 0.24 0.34 0.23 Intersection Summary Area Type:Other Cycle Length: 133 Actuated Cycle Length: 111.6 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 30.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.5%ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 34 DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 2: Eldamain Road & Corneils Road 03/19/2026 NB PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 8:54 am 03/19/2026 No-Build Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 49 0 37 0 307 27 43 569 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 49 0 37 0 307 27 43 569 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - 245 - - 205 - 215 200 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0000012040040 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 52 0 39 0 327 29 46 605 0 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1023 1023 327 605 0 0 355 0 0 Stage 1 327 327 ------- Stage 2 697 697 ------- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 6.32 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45.5------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45.5------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.408 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 263 237 692 983 - - 1215 - - Stage 1 736 652 ------- Stage 2 498 446 ------- Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 253 0 692 983 - - 1215 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 253 0 ------- Stage 1 736 0 ------- Stage 2 479 0 ------- Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 17.55 0 0.57 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)983 - - 253 692 1215 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.206 0.057 0.038 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)0 - - 22.9 10.5 8.1 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.8 0.2 0.1 - -DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 3: Eldamain Road /Eldamain Road & Menards Access Drive 03/19/2026 NB PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 8:54 am 03/19/2026 No-Build Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 126 200 190 207 521 97 Future Vol, veh/h 126 200 190 207 521 97 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 0 300 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 1 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 9 14 9 4 9 Mvmt Flow 147 233 221 241 606 113 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1345 662 719 0 - 0 Stage 1 662 ----- Stage 2 683 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.46 6.29 4.24 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 15.46----- Critical Hdwy Stg 25.46----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.554 3.381 2.326 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 164 450 830 - - - Stage 1 505 ----- Stage 2 494 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 120 450 830 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 247 ----- Stage 1 371 ----- Stage 2 494 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 28.08 5.22 0 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)830 - 247 450 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.266 - 0.594 0.517 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)10.9 - 38.9 21.3 - - HCM Lane LOS B - E C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 - 3.4 2.9 - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoonDRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 4: Eldamain Road & Faxon Road 03/19/2026 NB PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 8:54 am 03/19/2026 No-Build Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 33 0 3 1 1 1 7 364 4 3 682 35 Future Vol, veh/h 33 0 3 1 1 1 7 364 4 3 682 35 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 50 -----170--40-- Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 12 25 33 5 3 Mvmt Flow 36 0 3 1 1 1 8 396 4 3 741 38 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1178 1182 760 1161 1199 398 779 0 0 400 0 0 Stage 1 767 767 - 413 413 ------- Stage 2 411 415 - 748 786 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.39 - - 4.43 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 16.15.5-6.15.5------- Critical Hdwy Stg 26.15.5-6.15.5------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.461 - - 2.497 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 169 191 409 174 187 656 729 - - 1009 - - Stage 1 398 414 - 620 597 ------- Stage 2 622 596 - 408 406 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 166 189 409 170 184 656 729 - - 1009 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 290 303 - 292 296 ------- Stage 1 397 413 - 614 591 ------- Stage 2 613 590 - 403 405 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 18.72 15.09 0.19 0.04 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)729 - - 290 409 360 1009 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - - 0.124 0.008 0.009 0.003 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)10 - - 19.2 13.9 15.1 8.6 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C B C A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0--0.4000--DRAFT Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Year 2031 Total Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road 03/19/2026 PR AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 2:40 pm 03/18/2026 Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 153 163 51 69 74 13 20 438 65 3 153 70 Future Volume (vph) 153 163 51 69 74 13 20 438 65 3 153 70 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft)290 260 150 155 140 150 230 230 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft)190 180 170 200 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot)1787 1942 1392 1337 1869 1615 1530 1980 1292 1805 1845 1615 Flt Permitted 0.495 0.651 0.598 0.430 Satd. Flow (perm)931 1942 1392 916 1869 1615 963 1980 1292 817 1845 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)116 116 89 89 Link Speed (mph)30 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft)4330 3472 4586 3161 Travel Time (s)98.4 78.9 69.5 47.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles (%)1% 3% 16% 35% 7% 0% 18% 1% 25% 0% 3% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 158 168 53 71 76 13 21 452 67 3 158 72 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Protected Phases 745381523167 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 745381523167 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)11.0 24.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 Total Split (s)11.0 34.0 11.0 11.0 34.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 Total Split (%)13.8% 42.5% 13.8% 13.8% 42.5% 13.8% 13.8% 30.0% 13.8% 13.8% 30.0% 13.8% Yellow Time (s)3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All-Red Time (s)0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)3.5 6.0 3.5 5.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 5.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Max None None Max None Act Effct Green (s)18.6 10.3 19.1 12.5 9.6 15.5 30.4 28.3 37.0 28.5 24.7 38.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.19 0.34 0.22 0.17 0.28 0.55 0.51 0.67 0.51 0.44 0.70 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.47 0.10 0.29 0.24 0.02 0.04 0.45 0.08 0.01 0.19 0.06 Control Delay (s/veh) 14.0 26.7 0.6 17.1 23.3 0.1 9.3 17.5 1.9 9.0 18.1 2.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 14.0 26.7 0.6 17.1 23.3 0.1 9.3 17.5 1.9 9.0 18.1 2.1 LOS BCABCAABAABA Approach Delay (s/veh)17.7 18.7 15.2 13.0 Approach LOS BBBB Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 57 0 17 25 0 4 112 0 1 45 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 74 109 3 42 57 0 15 #304 13 5 96 14DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road 03/19/2026 PR AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 2:40 pm 03/18/2026 Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft)4250 3392 4506 3081 Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 260 150 155 140 150 230 230 Base Capacity (vph) 486 1017 591 249 979 587 607 1009 889 571 818 1155 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.17 0.09 0.29 0.08 0.02 0.03 0.45 0.08 0.01 0.19 0.06 Intersection Summary Area Type:Other Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 55.6 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.47 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 16.0 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.8%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 3403/19/2026 PR AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 2:40 pm 03/18/2026 Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 249 463 60 74 238 107 34 252 140 91 105 81 Future Volume (vph) 249 463 60 74 238 107 34 252 140 91 105 81 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft)300 215 200 300 215 215 330 250 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft)220 170 205 120 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 3689 1392 1480 3585 1429 1752 1869 1538 1543 1681 1482 Flt Permitted 0.491 0.419 0.682 0.436 Satd. Flow (perm)915 3689 1392 653 3585 1429 1258 1869 1538 708 1681 1482 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)93 119 156 90 Link Speed (mph)45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft)6798 4542 2076 4964 Travel Time (s)103.0 68.8 31.5 75.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%)2% 3% 16% 22% 6% 13% 3% 7% 5% 17% 19% 9% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 277 514 67 82 264 119 38 280 156 101 117 90 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Protected Phases 745381523167 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 745381523167 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)9.5 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 11.0 9.5 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s)18.0 47.0 11.0 18.0 47.0 11.0 11.0 24.0 18.0 11.0 24.0 18.0 Total Split (%)18.0% 47.0% 11.0% 18.0% 47.0% 11.0% 11.0% 24.0% 18.0% 11.0% 24.0% 18.0% Yellow Time (s)3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All-Red Time (s)0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)3.5 6.0 3.5 5.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 5.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Max None None Max None Act Effct Green (s)29.8 15.0 27.5 20.9 12.6 25.7 27.0 18.1 31.9 29.2 20.9 39.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.22 0.40 0.30 0.18 0.37 0.39 0.26 0.46 0.42 0.30 0.57 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.64 0.11 0.28 0.41 0.20 0.07 0.57 0.20 0.26 0.23 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.0 28.7 2.2 15.3 27.2 4.1 12.8 29.0 3.1 14.6 23.0 2.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 16.0 28.7 2.2 15.3 27.2 4.1 12.8 29.0 3.1 14.6 23.0 2.8 LOS BCABCABCABCA Approach Delay (s/veh)22.5 19.2 19.1 14.3 Approach LOS C B B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 74 105 0 21 53 0 9 103 0 24 38 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 124 157 13 45 87 29 28 199 30 60 90 21DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 3403/19/2026 PR AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 2:40 pm 03/18/2026 Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft)6718 4462 1996 4884 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 215 200 300 215 215 330 250 Base Capacity (vph) 586 2199 630 392 2137 613 565 489 889 390 507 924 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.23 0.11 0.21 0.12 0.19 0.07 0.57 0.18 0.26 0.23 0.10 Intersection Summary Area Type:Other Cycle Length: 100 Actuated Cycle Length: 69.2 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 19.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.4%ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 34 DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 2: Eldamain Road & Corneils Road 03/19/2026 PR AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 2:40 pm 03/18/2026 Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 28 0 23 0 500 43 19 254 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 28 0 23 0 500 43 19 254 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - 245 - - 205 - 215 200 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 000000020020 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 30 0 24 0 532 46 20 270 0 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 843 843 532 270 0 0 578 0 0 Stage 1 532 532 ------- Stage 2 311 311 ------- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45.5------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45.5------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 337 303 551 1305 - - 1006 - - Stage 1 593 529 ------- Stage 2 748 662 ------- Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 330 0 551 1305 - - 1006 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 330 0 ------- Stage 1 593 0 ------- Stage 2 733 0 ------- Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 14.66 0 0.6 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1305 - - 330 551 1006 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.09 0.044 0.02 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)0 - - 17 11.8 8.7 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.1 0.1 - -DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 3: Eldamain Road /Eldamain Road & Menards Access Drive/Proposed Access Drive 03/19/2026 PR AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 2:40 pm 03/18/2026 Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 0 33 19 0 11 113 524 47 26 170 87 Future Vol, veh/h 9 0 33 19 0 11 113 524 47 26 170 87 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - 0 - - 300 - 150 215 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 5006220214322916 Mvmt Flow 10 0 36 21 0 12 123 570 51 28 185 95 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1104 1155 232 1057 1151 570 279 0 0 621 0 0 Stage 1 289 289 - 815 815 ------- Stage 2 815 866 - 241 336 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.6 6.5 6.82 7.12 6.5 6.22 4.24 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 16.65.5-6.125.5------- Critical Hdwy Stg 26.65.5-6.125.5------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.95 4 3.858 3.518 4 3.318 2.326 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 153 199 679 203 200 521 1217 - - 960 - - Stage 1 626 677 - 371 394 ------- Stage 2 309 373 - 762 646 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 130 173 679 168 174 521 1217 - - 960 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 202 254 - 261 265 ------- Stage 1 608 657 - 334 354 ------- Stage 2 272 335 - 701 627 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 13.4 17.07 1.37 0.81 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1217 - - 202 679 261 521 960 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.101 - - 0.048 0.053 0.079 0.023 0.029 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)8.3 - - 23.7 10.6 20 12.1 8.9 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C B C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 - -DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 4: Eldamain Road & Faxon Road 03/19/2026 PR AM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 2:40 pm 03/18/2026 Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 0 7 0 0 1 4 639 0 0 211 11 Future Vol, veh/h 44 0 7 0 0 1 4 639 0 0 211 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 50 -----170--40-- Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 001400006002010 Mvmt Flow 46 0 7 0 0 1 4 673 0 0 222 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 909 909 228 903 915 673 234 0 0 673 0 0 Stage 1 228 228 - 681 681 ------- Stage 2 681 681 - 222 234 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.34 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 16.15.5-6.15.5------- Critical Hdwy Stg 26.15.5-6.15.5------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.426 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 258 277 782 260 275 459 1346 - - 928 - - Stage 1 779 719 - 444 453 ------- Stage 2 444 453 - 785 715 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 257 276 782 257 274 459 1346 - - 928 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 359 367 - 359 365 ------- Stage 1 779 719 - 442 452 ------- Stage 2 441 452 - 778 715 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 15.57 12.86 0.05 0 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)1346 - - 359 782 459 928 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.129 0.009 0.002 - - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)7.7 - - 16.5 9.6 12.9 0 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C A B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0--0.4000--DRAFT Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Year 2031 Total Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road 03/19/2026 PR PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 2:41 pm 03/18/2026 Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)67 103 61 100 138 4 50 214 103 16 457 168 Future Volume (vph)67 103 61 100 138 4 50 214 103 16 457 168 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft)290 260 150 155 140 150 230 230 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft)190 180 170 200 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 1980 1482 1570 1942 1615 1570 1961 1380 1687 1881 1615 Flt Permitted 0.510 0.684 0.279 0.611 Satd. Flow (perm)950 1980 1482 1130 1942 1615 461 1961 1380 1085 1881 1615 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)83 83 114 187 Link Speed (mph)30 30 45 45 Link Distance (ft)4330 3472 4491 3161 Travel Time (s)98.4 78.9 68.0 47.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%)2% 1% 9% 15% 3% 0% 15% 2% 17% 7% 1% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 74 114 68 111 153 4 56 238 114 18 508 187 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Protected Phases 745381523167 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 745381523167 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s)10.0 34.5 10.0 10.0 34.5 9.5 10.0 31.0 10.0 9.5 30.5 10.0 Total Split (%)11.8% 40.6% 11.8% 11.8% 40.6% 11.2% 11.8% 36.5% 11.8% 11.2% 35.9% 11.8% Yellow Time (s)3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All-Red Time (s)0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Max None None Max None Act Effct Green (s)17.7 10.2 22.8 16.9 10.4 18.8 34.3 29.4 42.2 32.4 25.5 40.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.16 0.36 0.27 0.17 0.30 0.55 0.47 0.67 0.52 0.41 0.64 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.35 0.12 0.32 0.48 0.01 0.15 0.26 0.12 0.03 0.67 0.17 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.4 28.2 3.5 18.1 30.8 0.0 8.8 14.3 2.3 8.0 24.2 2.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 16.4 28.2 3.5 18.1 30.8 0.0 8.8 14.3 2.3 8.0 24.2 2.0 LOS BCABCAABAACA Approach Delay (s/veh)18.2 25.1 10.2 17.9 Approach LOS B C B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 42 0 32 58 0 10 50 0 3 177 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 85 18 64 109 0 28 129 21 12 #344 26DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road 03/19/2026 PR PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 2:41 pm 03/18/2026 Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 2 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft)4250 3392 4411 3081 Turn Bay Length (ft) 290 260 150 155 140 150 230 230 Base Capacity (vph) 362 927 598 353 909 548 370 916 965 620 761 1095 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.12 0.11 0.31 0.17 0.01 0.15 0.26 0.12 0.03 0.67 0.17 Intersection Summary Area Type:Other Cycle Length: 85 Actuated Cycle Length: 62.9 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.67 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 17.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.0%ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 1: Eldamain Road/Ashe Road & Galena Road DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 3403/19/2026 PR PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 2:41 pm 03/18/2026 Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 3 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 176 568 50 202 681 64 70 149 133 165 272 247 Future Volume (vph) 176 568 50 202 681 64 70 149 133 165 272 247 Ideal Flow (vphpl)1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 Storage Length (ft)300 215 200 300 215 215 330 250 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft)220 170 205 120 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot)1770 3725 1524 1770 3762 1429 1770 1695 1568 1671 1961 1553 Flt Permitted 0.148 0.230 0.551 0.596 Satd. Flow (perm)276 3725 1524 428 3762 1429 1026 1695 1568 1049 1961 1553 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR)53 67 140 220 Link Speed (mph)45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft)6798 4542 2076 4992 Travel Time (s)103.0 68.8 31.5 75.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%)2% 2% 6% 2% 1% 13% 2% 18% 3% 8% 2% 4% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 185 598 53 213 717 67 74 157 140 174 286 260 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Protected Phases 745381523167 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 745381523167 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s)9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 9.5 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s)23.0 49.0 16.0 21.0 47.0 16.0 16.0 47.0 21.0 16.0 47.0 23.0 Total Split (%)17.3% 36.8% 12.0% 15.8% 35.3% 12.0% 12.0% 35.3% 15.8% 12.0% 35.3% 17.3% Yellow Time (s)3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 3.5 All-Red Time (s)0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s)3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 3.5 6.0 3.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Max None None Max None Act Effct Green (s)43.2 27.0 41.1 43.8 27.3 44.2 52.0 41.4 61.4 57.8 46.4 66.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.24 0.37 0.39 0.24 0.39 0.46 0.37 0.55 0.51 0.41 0.59 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.67 0.09 0.64 0.79 0.11 0.14 0.25 0.15 0.29 0.35 0.26 Control Delay (s/veh) 32.5 42.7 6.3 30.6 46.8 5.6 16.9 28.8 3.0 17.8 27.5 3.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay (s/veh) 32.5 42.7 6.3 30.6 46.8 5.6 16.9 28.8 3.0 17.8 27.5 3.7 LOS CDACDABCABCA Approach Delay (s/veh)38.1 40.5 16.7 16.6 Approach LOS D D B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 86 209 0 101 257 0 26 79 0 65 144 12 Queue Length 95th (ft) 140 279 25 155 345 28 63 156 33 133 268 59DRAFT Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 3403/19/2026 PR PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 2:41 pm 03/18/2026 Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Internal Link Dist (ft)6718 4462 1996 4912 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 215 200 300 215 215 330 250 Base Capacity (vph) 376 1438 650 385 1384 624 596 624 967 610 809 1075 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000000 Storage Cap Reductn 000000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 0.42 0.08 0.55 0.52 0.11 0.12 0.25 0.14 0.29 0.35 0.24 Intersection Summary Area Type:Other Cycle Length: 133 Actuated Cycle Length: 112.4 Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.79 Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 30.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.1%ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Eldamain Road & Veterans Parkway (US Route 34)/Veterans Parkway (US Route 34 DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 2: Eldamain Road & Corneils Road 03/19/2026 PR PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 2:41 pm 03/18/2026 Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 50 0 37 0 330 31 43 575 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 50 0 37 0 330 31 43 575 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - 245 - - 205 - 215 200 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 0000012040040 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 53 0 39 0 351 33 46 612 0 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1054 1054 351 612 0 0 384 0 0 Stage 1 351 351 ------- Stage 2 703 703 ------- Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 6.32 4.1 - - 4.1 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45.5------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45.5------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.408 2.2 - - 2.2 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 252 228 670 977 - - 1185 - - Stage 1 717 636 ------- Stage 2 495 443 ------- Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 243 0 670 977 - - 1185 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 243 0 ------- Stage 1 717 0 ------- Stage 2 475 0 ------- Approach WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 18.32 0 0.57 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)977 - - 243 670 1185 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.219 0.059 0.039 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)0 - - 24 10.7 8.2 - - HCM Lane LOS A - - C B A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.8 0.2 0.1 - -DRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 3: Eldamain Road /Eldamain Road & Menards Access Drive/Proposed Access Drive 03/19/2026 PR PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 2:41 pm 03/18/2026 Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 20.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 126 0 200 48 0 27 190 208 11 7 521 97 Future Vol, veh/h 126 0 200 48 0 27 190 208 11 7 521 97 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 0 - - 0 - - 300 - 150 215 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 6092021492249 Mvmt Flow 147 0 233 56 0 31 221 242 13 8 606 113 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1362 1375 662 1306 1419 242 719 0 0 255 0 0 Stage 1 678 678 - 684 684 ------- Stage 2 684 697 - 622 735 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.16 6.5 6.29 7.12 6.5 6.22 4.24 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 16.165.5-6.125.5------- Critical Hdwy Stg 26.165.5-6.125.5------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.554 4 3.381 3.518 4 3.318 2.326 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 123 147 450 137 138 797 830 - - 1310 - - Stage 1 435 454 - 439 452 ------- Stage 2 432 446 - 474 429 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 86 107 450 ~ 48 101 797 830 - - 1310 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 198 218 - ~ 48 101 ------- Stage 1 433 452 - 322 332 ------- Stage 2 305 327 - 228 426 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 37.01 205.56 5.07 0.09 HCM LOS E F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)830 - - 198 450 48 797 1310 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.266 - - 0.74 0.517 1.158 0.039 0.006 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)10.9 - - 62 21.3$ 315.7 9.7 7.8 - - HCM Lane LOS B - - F C F A A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 - - 4.9 2.9 5.1 0.1 0 - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoonDRAFT HCM 7th TWSC 4: Eldamain Road & Faxon Road 03/19/2026 PR PM 24-050 - Data Center - Yorkville 2:41 pm 03/18/2026 Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Synchro 12 Report Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 33 0 3 1 1 1 7 375 4 3 730 35 Future Vol, veh/h 33 0 3 1 1 1 7 375 4 3 730 35 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 50 -----170--40-- Veh in Median Storage, # - 1 - - 1 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 12 25 33 5 3 Mvmt Flow 36 0 3 1 1 1 8 408 4 3 793 38 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1242 1246 812 1225 1263 410 832 0 0 412 0 0 Stage 1 819 819 - 425 425 ------- Stage 2 423 427 - 800 838 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.39 - - 4.43 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 16.15.5-6.15.5------- Critical Hdwy Stg 26.15.5-6.15.5------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.461 - - 2.497 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 153 175 382 157 171 646 696 - - 998 - - Stage 1 372 392 - 611 590 ------- Stage 2 612 589 - 382 384 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 150 173 382 154 169 646 696 - - 998 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 272 287 - 273 280 ------- Stage 1 371 391 - 604 583 ------- Stage 2 604 582 - 377 383 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 19.74 15.63 0.19 0.03 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)696 - - 272 382 342 998 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 - - 0.132 0.009 0.01 0.003 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v)10.2 - - 20.2 14.5 15.6 8.6 - - HCM Lane LOS B - - C B C A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0--0.4000--DRAFT PLAN COUNCIL AGENDA Thursday, May 14, 2026 9:00 a.m. City Hall Community Development 3rd Floor – East Conference Room Remote Access via Zoom 1. Minutes for approval: April 9, 2026 2. PZC 2026-03 C-1 Yorkville (Chi-11) Data Center – PUD Amendment & Preliminary PUD Plan Adjournment United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 DRAFT Page 1 of 1 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLAN COUNCIL Community Development East Conference Room, 3rd floor 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Yorkville, IL Thursday, April 9, 2026 9:00am IN ATTENDANCE: Krysti Barksdale Noble, Community Development Director Sara Mendez, Senior Planner David Hansen, Senior Planner Thian Dim, Planner 1 Pete Ratos, Building Code Official Katelyn Gregory, Community Engagement and Marketing Coordinator Lynn Dubajic Kellogg, Economic Development Director Tom Scofield, Ross Lane Development Gary Holm, EEI Mike Torrence, Fire Marshal/BKFD--Zoom Heather DiVerde, School District #115—Zoom Ms. Noble called the meeting to order at 9:00am, followed by introductions of meeting participants. 1. Minutes for approval: November 13, 2025 The minutes were approved as presented. 2. PZC 2026-02 Grande Reserve Units 10B & 11B – Final Plat Ms. Dim said Final Plat application was received for these units and is Phase 2 of this area. As of March 26th, 40% of the 158 townhome units of Phase 1 are built or under construction. Phase 2 will be comprised of 154 townhome units for a total of 312 units, an increase from the originally planned 298. She noted that snow removal of the cul-de-sacs in units 10 and 11 must be done and paid for by the HOA. She said the setbacks meet the minimum requirements and the petitioner will need to verify the setbacks at the time of building permits. Ms. Dim also presented some visuals showing elevations and models. She noted the Police Department had submitted some comments. Mr. Holm reviewed the memo for the plats and only had minor comments. Building Code Official Mr. Ratos and Fire Marshal Torrence had no comments at this time. Ms. Dim said the next step is to move this forward to the May EDC meeting. Adjournment There was no further business and the meeting adjourned at 9:06am. Minutes respectfully transcribed by Marlys Young, Minute Taker 1 I have reviewed the applications for Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment and Preliminary PUD Plan received April 21, 2026 as submitted by C1 Yorkville, LLC, Petitioner, as well as the following supplemental documents/plans: 1. Project Narrative (Petition for Development Approval) prepared and submitted by Rosanova & Whitaker, Ltd., attorney, on behalf of C1 Yorkville, LLC, petitioner. 2. Concept PUD Plan, prepared by Pinnacle Engineering Group and dated 03/12/26. 3. Major Change & Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plan, prepared by Pinnacle Engineering Group and dated 03/12/26. 4. Final Plat of Subdivision, prepared by Pinnacle Engineering Group and dated 3/13/2026. 5. Color Building Rendering and Exterior Elevations, prepared by Corgan and dated 03/12/26. 6. Noise Study, prepared by Trinity Consultants and dated April 22, 2026. 7. Data Center Impact Analysis – An Assessment of Potential Electric System Reliability and Cost Impacts of a Proposed Data Center in Yorkville, prepared by The Power Burau, LLC dated 2026. 8. The Fiscal Benefits of the Proposed CyrusOne C1 Data Center Development in Yorkville, prepared by Gruen Gruen + Associates and dated March 2026. 9. The Economic Impacts of the Proposed CyrusOne C1 Data Center Development in Yorkville, prepared by Gruen Gruen + Associates and dated February 2026. 10. Traffic Impact Study Proposed Data Center, prepared by KLOA and dated March 24, 2026. The petitioner is seeking approval to amend existing ordinances (Ord. 2024-33 approving a special use Planned Unit Development and Ord. 2026-09 Minor Amendment to the Approved Planned Unit Development) for Major Planned Unit Development Amendment and Preliminary PUD Plan to construct a secured data center campus and on-site substation on approximately 228- acres of land located at the northeast corner of Faxon Road and Eldamain Road, also known as CyrusOne’s CHI-11 campus. The site will consist of eight (8) one-story standalone buildings with a total building area of up to 2,163,800 square feet to be developed in phases over a 10-20 year period. Based upon my review of the applications, supplemental documents, and concept PUD a preliminary PUD site plans, I have compiled the following comments: GENERAL PUD MAJOR AMENDMENT COMMENTS: The previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement for the C1 Yorkville (CHI-11) CyrusOne data center campus (Ordinance 2024-33) was established prior to the City’s adoption of Energy Industrial Use standards for data centers via Ordinance 2025-53 in June 2025. Sections 2.1 and 4.3 of the previously approved PUD Agreement permit the waiver of subsequently adopted, more stringent Energy Memorandum To: Plan Council From: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Date: May 6, 2026 Subject: PZC 2026-03 C1 Yorkville – CHI 11 (Cyrus One) Data Center NE Corner of Faxon Road & Eldamain Road Proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment & Preliminary PUD Plan 2 Industrial Use regulations, effectively vesting the development standards within the current agreement for a period of 20 years. The original PUD Agreement established the following: 1. CURRENT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) – Section 10-8-8 of City’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) establishes standards for Planned Unit Development (PUDs). PUDs are allowed to modify standards of the base district as long as the requested modifications are specifically identified and demonstrates how each allowance is compatible with surrounding development, is necessary for proper development of the site, and is aligned with at least one (1) modification standard found in Section 10-8-8D of the UDO. a. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement (Ordinance 2024-33) approved certain deviations from the base M-2 General Manufacturing District standards for the subject property related to: building setbacks for interior lots, parking requirements, vehicular cross access, pedestrian circulation, off-street loading, landscape requirements internal to the site, certain mechanical screening requirements (subject to sound study approval), street design for lots, and appearance standards. b. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement (Ordinance 2024-33) established modification standard #12 “Regional Utility Improvements” applies to the subject property, as the proposed development will extend public utilities (water and sanitary) to and through the property resulting in recapturable payments to the developer when future property owners in the area benefit from connecting to such utility that had not previously existed. 2. PROPOSED MAJOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT - Section 7.1 of the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement established the criteria for major amendments which results in one or more of the following changes to the approved Preliminary PUD Plan: a. More than 10% increase in square footage of the buildings. i. Proposed plan illustrates a decrease in the total building square footage of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan from 2,163,800 to 2,062,500 on the Major PUD Preliminary Plan but seeks an allowance to maintain the previously approved maximum building square footage. NOT APPLICABLE. b. Any structure greater than 100 feet in height. i. Proposed plan decreases the maximum height of the data center buildings on the Minor PUD Preliminary Plan from a maximum of 70’-0” to top of equipment to 50’-10” to top of equipment screening wall on the Major PUD Preliminary Plan. NOT APPLICABLE. c. Except as other set forth above, any deviation from the site data standards set forth on the Site Plan. i. It is noted that the provided parking spaces increased from 378 stalls on the Site Data Standards of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to 437 stalls on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan. APPLICABLE. ii. It is noted that the provided building coverage increased from 10.9% on the Site Data Standards of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to 18.6% on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan. APPLICABLE. iii. It is noted that the provided site coverage increased from 28.7% on the Site Data Standards of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to 50.3% on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan. APPLICABLE. d. Any deviation from applicable provisions of the UDO. 3 i. In addition to the criteria set forth above, Section 7.1 of the approved Planned Unit Development agreement also references major amendment criteria established in Section 10-8-8(G)(2) of the UDO as binding, which is as follows: 1. Increase density. NOT APPLICABLE. 2. Increase the height of buildings. NOT APPLICABLE. 3. Reduce open space by more than five (5) percent. APPLICABLE. a. Building coverage increased 7.7% from 10.9% on the Site Data Standards of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to 18.6% on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan. b. Site coverage increased 21.6% from 28.7% on the Site Data Standards of the approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to 50.3% on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan. APPLICABLE 4. Modify the proportion of housing types. NOT APPLICABLE. 5. Change parking areas in a manner that is inconsistent with this UDO. NOT APPLICABLE. 6. Increase the approved gross floor area by more than five hundred (500) square feet. NOT APPLICABLE. 7. Alter alignment of roads, utilities, or drainage. APPLICABLE. a. Proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan illustrates significant changes to the site access and road alignments off of Eldamain Road, a new access off of Beecher Road, and reconfigurations to onsite stormwater management basins. 8. Result in any other change inconsistent with any standard or condition imposed by the City Council in approving the Planned Unit Development and/or the approved Site Plan, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. NOT APPLICABLE. 3. ZONING - The subject property consists of seven (7) parcels (#02-18-300-004, #02-19-100- 004, #02-19-100-005, #02-18-300-003, #02-18-300-001, #02-18-300-002, and #02-18-400- 004) and is zoned M-2 GENERAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT. The following are the most current immediate surrounding zoning and land uses based on recent development approvals: Zoning Land Use North A-1 (Kendall County) ComEd Substation/Transfer Station - Utility Use South A-1 (Kendall County) BNSF Railroad Agricultural, Residential and Business Uses Transportation Land Use East A-1 SU (Kendall County) A-1 SU (Yorkville) Agriculture/Former Residence (Owned by Petitioner) Solar Farm West Eldamain Road M-2 General Manufacturing (Plano) A-1 (Kendall County) Transportation Land Use Menards Distribution Center Residential/Farm 4. ENERGY INDUSTRIAL USE STANDARDS –Data centers are defined as Energy Industrial Uses per Table 10-3-12(B) in the Unified Development Ordinance. While the previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement provides for the waiver of subsequently adopted Energy Industrial Use standards from applying to the subject property, 4 staff has identified and outlined the provisions contained in Section 10-4-10 of the UDO, as adopted in June 2025, and offers the following relevant comments: i. LANDSCAPE BUFFER - Section 10-4-10(A)(1) of the UDO requires data center developments to maintain a minimum 100-foot landscape buffer when adjacent to non-manufacturing land uses, inclusive of an 8-foot tall berm when adjacent to residential and dedicated exclusively for dense landscaping including trees and shrubs but not utilized for stormwater detention, roadways, walking trails or surface parking. Additionally, a minimum 100-foot landscape buffer is required when a data center is adjacent to a public roadway and shall consist of a Transition Zone D landscape buffer. 1. The proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan illustrates a 100’ wide landscape buffer along Eldamain Road and Beecher Road. It appears there is a 50’ wide landscape buffer along a portion of the north property line adjacent to the Commonwealth Edison parcel and a varying depth landscape buffer of 50’-100’ wide along the southern property line. a. Due to the presence of two (2) existing residential land uses to the south on Faxon Road, staff recommends a minimum 8-foot tall berm be installed along this portion of the campus. b. The Landscape Plan indicates the security fencing will be located in front of the 100’ landscape buffer along the south property line adjacent to Faxon Road. However, the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan indicates the security fencing will be located behind Stormwater Basin #7. Please reconcile the plans accordingly. c. The Parks & Recreation Department has inquired about the petitioner providing a trail easement along the Beecher Road and Eldamain Road frontages of the subject property. d. Staff defers to the Landscape Reviewer for additional comments. 2. BUILDING SEPARATION – Section 10-4-10(A)(3) of the UDO requires a minimum of a 500-foot building separation from the nearest data center building or structure (primary or accessory) to the nearest residential or commercial structure. a. While the Site Data table on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan indicates “No Building within 500’ of existing residence”, staff recommends the plan be revised to provide dimensioned distances of the nearest data center building(s) to residential properties along Faxon Road and the two (2) unincorporated residential parcels along the west side of Eldamain Road (PINs #01-24-200- 001 and #01-13-400-004). 3. OPERATIONAL TESTING – Section 10-4-10(A)(6) of the UDO requires operational testing of emergency backup generators be limited to between the hours of 11am to 5pm on weekdays only, non- holidays. 5 a. Staff will require written confirmation from the petitioner acknowledging this standard as part of the amended Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement. 4. NUCLEAR ENERGY – Section 10-4-10(A)(7) of the UDO strictly prohibits data centers from using, generating, storing, or deploying nuclear energy as a power source within the City. This includes, but is not limited to, nuclear reactors, small modular reactors (SMRs), or any other nuclear-based energy. a. Staff will require written confirmation from the petitioner acknowledging this standard as part of the amended Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement. 5. PHASING PLAN - Section 10-4-10(A)(8) of the UDO requires the implementation of a phased construction plan that minimizes impacts on residential structures by prioritizing initial development at the farthest distance from existing residential structures. a. The previously approved Preliminary PUD Plan included a nine (9) phased development plan with each phase consisting of one (1) building and associated stormwater basin. While there is no illustrated phasing plan on the proposed Major Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan, it is noted in the petition that construction is planned to begin with Building 11A (northwest quadrant) this fall with an anticipated tenant occupancy by the end of Q1 2028. i. Staff recommends a formal phasing exhibit be provided as an exhibit to the proposed Major Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan. 6. FENCING - Section 10-4-10(A)(9) of the UDO requires fencing be constructed of security style aluminum, steel, wrought iron, or similar materials. Chain-link or barbed wire fencing is prohibited along public facing edges and properties adjacent to residential land uses. a. Petitioner has provided an image of the proposed high security steel fencing on the Landscape Plan. Staff requests the petitioner verify the height of the proposed fencing. 7. LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - Section 10-4- 10(A)(10) of the UDO requires lighting and photometric plans must be submitted at the time of application and adhere to the City’s outside lighting standards. a. Per the previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement, the developer agrees to submit to the City for its approval a photometric plan with manufacturers cut sheets of the proposed lighting standards to be installed in the parking area of the subject property. The photometric plan is to be provided with an application for final plat of at such time the Developer submits for a building permit. i. Since the petitioner has provided in the packet materials a Final Plat of Subdivision (although no application was filed for approval) and the petitioner has indicated they intend to seek a 6 building permit this fall, staff recommends the submittal of a photometric plan as part of this request for Major PUD Preliminary Plan Amendment. 8. TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN - Section 10-4-10(A)(11) of the UDO requires a Traffic Management Plan be provided during construction, including a communication strategy and an on-site point of contact during construction. a. Staff recommends the petitioner provide a Traffic Management Plan as part of the building permitting process. 9. BATTERY STORAGE – Section 10-4-10(A)(12) of the UDO requires battery storage systems shall be located a minimum of 50 feet away from any adjacent structure and must be readily accessible by Bristol Kendal Fire Protection District (BKFD) for firefighting efforts. a. Is the petitioner proposing any battery storage systems on site? If so, staff requests additional information on location and specifications. 10. EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN - Section 10-4-10(A)(13) of the UDO requires an Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) be submitted and approved by the City and the Bristol Kendal Fire Protection District (BKFD) prior to issuance of a building permit and must include: a. Procedures for fire suppression, hazardous material spills, evacuation, and communication in case of an incident. b. The location of any battery storage systems. c. Training sessions/drills and or walkthroughs with fire and police shall be required prior to occupancy permit. d. Designated contacts for emergency services and a plan to broadcast information if an incident could affect the public. e. Must work with KenCom emergency managers to be part of text or siren alert systems. a. Staff will require written confirmation from the petitioner acknowledging this standard as part of the amended Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement. 11. BUILDING CODE ENHANCED STANDARDS - Section 10-4- 10(A)(14) of the UDO requires installing advanced early fire detection in server rooms, using fire-resistive construction beyond code minimums on walls facing neighborhoods, or providing additional hazardous material safeguards. Compliance with National Fire Protection Association 855 is also required. a. Staff will require written confirmation from the petitioner acknowledging this standard as part of the amended Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement. 7 PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN COMMENTS: 5. MAJOR PUD AMENDMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN – Below is a summary site data table comparing the originally approved Preliminary PUD Plan, the recently approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan amendment, and the currently proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan amendment: Originally Approved Preliminary PUD Plan Recently Approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan Proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan % Change from Minor PUD Preliminary Plan Number of Buildings 9 8 8 N/A Size of Buildings 152,000 – 287,400 sq. ft. 152,000 – 287,400 sq. ft. 137,500 – 275,000 sq. ft. -9.5% -4.3% Total Building Area 2,451,200 sq. ft. 2,163,800 sq. ft. 2,062,500 sq. ft. Up to 2,163,800 sq. ft. N/A Number of Stories 2 2 1 -50% Height of Buildings 55’ (top of building) 70’ (top of equipment) 55’ (top of building) 70’ (top of equipment) 36’ (top of building) 50’-10” (top of equipment) -34.5% -27.4% Number of Parking Spaces 432 378 437 +15.6% Percent Building Coverage 12.3% 10.9% 18.6% +70.6% Percent Site Coverage 35.6% 28.7% 50.3% +75.3% Number of Site Access Drives 2 Eldamain Rd (Primary/Single Drive) Faxon Rd (Emergency Access) 2 Eldamain Rd (Primary/Double Drive) Faxon Rd (Emergency Access) 3 Eldamain Road (Primary/Double Drive) Eldamain Road (Emergency Access) Beecher Road (Emergency Access) +50% Number of Stormwater Basins 6 6 7 +16.7% Substation Area 800’ x 1,000’ (800,000 sq. ft) 436’ x 920’ (401,120 sq. ft.) 436’ x 920’ (401,120 sq. ft.) N/A Distance of Nearest Residential Structure Undetermined Undetermined Undetermined TBD a. As stated previously, the petitioner must provide Building Structure/Separation distances for the originally approved PUD Preliminary Plan, recently approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan, and proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan so that staff can compare previous distances to nearby residential to proposed new distances. These dimensions can be provided on the Site Plan or a separate plan exhibit. b. Staff further recommends that the petitioner provide an additional Site Plan depicting the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan overlaid with the recently approved Minor PUD Preliminary Plan to serve as a visual comparison of the proposed changes and supplement the above table. 8 6. PARKING - According to the previously approved Preliminary PUD Plan as part of the Minor PUD Amendment, there were 378 total parking spaces provided. Additionally, the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement stated in Section 2.4 that the parking ratio shall be 0.2 spaces per 1,000 square feet of net floor area, but in case shall be less than 400 parking spaces, including ADA spaces. a. Per the Site Data table on the proposed Major PUD Preliminary Plan, the total required parking for the subject property based on 2,062,500 square feet is 413 spaces, including 9 ADA accessible spaces. i. However, the petitioner is proposing to provide a total of 437 parking spaces, including 16 ADA accessible spaces, based on the potential of accommodating up to 2,163,800 square feet of building net floor area. Additionally, per Section 10-5-1K-1 of the Unified Development Ordinance, a minimum of 9 electric vehicle charging stations is required. 7. SITE ACCESS – The previously approved Preliminary PUD Plan as part of the Minor PUD Amendment had access to the site via two (2) points of access. One (1) primary entrance off of Eldamain Road and a secondary emergency access off of Faxon Road. These access points lead to internal private roadways which loop around the eight (8) data center buildings and connect to the central electric substation. i. According to the proposed Major Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan, it is noted there are still two (2) points of access. The primary access point, a double drive or “boulevard-style” looped connection, continues to be located off Eldamain Road, which is consistent with the prior approved plan. However, the secondary emergency access point is now located off of Beecher Road and eliminates the connection on Faxon Road which is directly across from existing residential lots and driveways. ii. The new proposed secondary emergency access off of Beecher Road could potentially align with a future access drive to the parcel to the east which is also currently owned by the petitioner. iii. Staff defers to the City Engineer regarding site access. 8. MECHANICAL SCREENING – Per Section 10-5-4 Screening of the Unified Development Ordinance, ground/wall-mounted and roof mounted mechanical units that are visible from any public right-of-way or adjacent residential property shall be screened from public view. The previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement allowed the petitioner to deviate from this requirement by screening only the ground-mounted mechanical equipment but was not required to provide screening for any rooftop mechanical units. a. Per the petitioner’s statement, the now single-story buildings will include a mechanical penthouse incorporating an acoustic screen wall on all four (4) sides. This rooftop screening would be recessed from the primary façade of the buildings and provides a maximum height of approximately 51 feet. b. It is also noted the ground-mounted mechanical equipment in the Major PUD Preliminary Plan will no longer be screened as previously proposed with vinyl fencing equal to the height of the generator units (excluding any stacks protruding above the unit). i. It appears the proposed new screening for the ground-mounted mechanical equipment will be a solid screen wall constructed of a light- colored concrete panel approximately 18’ – 24’ tall providing full-height 9 coverage of the exterior equipment within this “mechanical yard”. Is this accurate? ii. The petitioner is also requesting flexibility to permit areas designated as “mechanical yards” to be converted to additional building floor area in the event that ground-mounted equipment is not required. This would allow the petitioner to achieve a maximum total building area of 2,163,800 square feet across the campus. 9. APPEARANCE STANDARDS – Per Section 10-5-8-C-4 Industrial Uses, masonry products or precast concrete shall be incorporated on at least fifty (50) percent of the total building, as broken down as follows: The "front facade" (defined as that facade that faces a street that includes a main entry to the building) shall itself incorporate masonry products or precast concrete on at least fifty (50) percent of the facade. Any other facade that abuts a street shall incorporate masonry products or precast concrete. The use of masonry products or precast concrete is encouraged on the remaining facades. Where precast concrete panels or split face block is utilized, the use of colors, patterns, or other architectural features within these panels/blocks is encouraged. a. Per Section 2.11 of the approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement, the petitioner was permitted to deviate from certain aspects of the Appearance Standards and required to provide prototype building elevations representative of the architectural design and building materials to be utilized. The plans illustrated exterior building elevations with materials such as concert panels, metal panels, and acoustic barrier screen walls in hues of gray and pewter. Further, the petitioner was required to provide updated elevations with any application for final plat or at time of building permit application. b. The proposed updated elevations continue to primarily feature light-colored precast concrete panels, complemented by medium and dark aluminum composite panel accents and a glass curtain wall system at the entrance. Additional design elements include prefinished metal coping and horizontal and vertical relief lines, which help break up the building mass and provide visual interest. While the buildings are now designed as single-story structures, the main entrance will feature a two-story element accommodating approximately 32,000 square feet of office space, with an overall height of 36 feet. The remainder of the data center building will have a height of 24 feet, excluding the rooftop equipment penthouse. 10. FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION – The petitioner has submitted a Final Plat of Subdivision that consolidates the existing seven (7) parcels comprising the site into a single parcel. The plat also establishes stormwater management easements granting the City perpetual access to the seven (7) proposed basins. This access ensures the City can enter the property to maintain these stormwater facilities in the event the petitioner does not fulfill its long-term maintenance obligations. a. While the petitioner has submitted a Final Plat of Subdivision as part of their application materials, a separate application for Final Plat of Subdivision approval was not provided. It is staff’s understanding that the petitioner does not wish to move forward with Final Plat approval at this time but provided the plan as an informational item. Please confirm. 11. SIGNAGE – Per Section 2.12 of the previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement, the petitioner was allowed to install a monument sign on Eldamain Road at the entrance of the project site in addition to a monument sign on Faxon Road. 10 a. Per Section 10-6-6 of the Unified Development Ordinance, single tenant buildings shall be permitted a total of two (2) primary wall signs or one (1) primary wall sign per one hundred (100) linear feet of building frontage. One (1) additional wall sign shall be allowed per additional hundred (100) feet of building frontage. Only one (1) primary wall sign shall be displayed on any single building façade. b. Since the proposed Major Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plan has eliminated the secondary entrance off of Faxon Road, is the petitioner still seeking to install a monument sign in this location? i. Is the petitioner seeking to install a secondary monument sign at the proposed new northern entrance off of Eldamain Road? ii. Is the petitioner seeking to install a monument sign at the proposed new entrance off of Beecher Road? 12. STUDIES a. Noise Study i. The petitioner has provided a preliminary noise study for the subject property dated April 22, 2026. It is noted that the study utilizes sound measurements taken in three (3) locations in September 2024. ii. It is noted that since that time, a 5MW solar farm was constructed on an approximately 26-acre site. This may or may not affect the baseline measurements taken in 2024. iii. It is also noted that the study references compliance with Yorkville’s Noise Ordinance as well as the Illinois Pollution Control Board noise requirements. iv. There have been previous comments related to “infra-sound” impacts, as well as vibration and sound impacts to domesticated and agricultural animals nearby. Can the petitioner’s expert provide commentary to these concerns? v. Staff defers to the City’s acoustical engineering consultant for comments on the findings of the study. b. Data Center Impact Analysis i. Staff notes the analysis references the project being a 960-megawatt data center. This is inconsistent with prior references to 540-megawatt center. Please verify the energy capacity for the development and revise report, if needed. c. Fiscal Benefits Report i. Staff notes the report references the project being a 540-megawatt critical IT capacity data center. This is inconsistent with the reference in the Data Center Impact Analysis report. Please verify the energy capacity for the development and revise the report, if needed. ii. Report references the data center campus as having 1,854,000 square feet with seven (7) buildings having 246,387 square feet and one (1) building having 129,350 square feet. The proposed preliminary PUD Plan has the total allowable building area as 2,163,800 square feet and the individual building sizes being 275,000 square feet and 137,500 square feet, respectively. Please revise report and associated tables for estimated tax revenue per building to reflect the currently proposed building areas. 11 iii. It is noted on Table 3 Estimated Annual Electric Tax Revenue at Build- Out for Yorkville on page 9 of the report, there is a reference to the City’s Electric Tax Rate of $0.0028 per kilowatt hour based on Section 3-2-4 Municipal Utility Tax of the Yorkville City Code. 1. Section 3-2-4 was recently amended in March 2026 via Ord. 2026-26 which revised the per kilowatt hour electric rate for users in excess of 20,000,000 kilowatt hours to $0.285. iv. It is noted that this parcel is wholly within Plano School District #88. d. Economic Impacts Report i. Report references the data center campus as having 1,854,000 square feet with seven (7) buildings having 246,387 square feet and one (1) building having 129,350 square feet. The proposed preliminary PUD Plan has the total allowable building area as 2,163,800 square feet and the individual building sizes being 275,000 square feet and 137,500 square feet, respectively. Please revise report and associated tables for estimated tax revenue per building to reflect the currently proposed building areas. ii. Has the petitioner considered preparing a Real Estate Valuation Assessment evaluating the potential impact of the proposed data center campus on nearby property values, or alternatively, providing examples of property values before and after construction of comparable data center developments? e. Traffic Impact Study i. It is noted the study references the data center campus as having 1,854,000 square feet and 466 parking spaces. The proposed preliminary PUD Plan has the total allowable building area as 2,163,800 square feet and 437 parking stalls. Please revise study to accurately reflect the currently proposed Preliminary PUD plan. ii. Staff defers to the City Engineer for further review comments of the Traffic Impact Study. f. Natural Resources Information (NRI) Report i. The petitioner has provided a Natural Resources Information report dated June 2024 as prepared by the Kendall County Soil & Water Conservation District. The report provides commentary on the subject property related to current conditions of natural resources such as soil composition, drainage, runoff, and wetland/flood information. ii. Staff defers to the City Engineer regarding the findings of this report. 13. COMMUNITY MEETING - Per Section 10-8-8-F-1-a of the Unified Development Ordinance states a community meeting of area/neighborhood property owners, explaining the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) Major Amendment conducted by the petitioner at their own expense and at a location of their choosing may be required as a recommendation from the Plan Council prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing date. a. Due to the petitioner’s request to reorient and resize the proposed data center buildings on the campus and the proximity of those structures to the residential land uses to the south on Faxon Road and west on Eldamain Road north of the BNSF railroad, staff recommends the petitioner reach out to the homeowners regarding the proposed Planned Unit Development 12 (PUD) Major Amendment prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing. 14. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDIES a. Has the petitioner completed, or does the petitioner intend to complete, additional environmental impact studies such as a Water Usage Study, Air Quality Study, EcoCAT Assessment, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment, Hazardous Materials/Chemical Handling Study, or Climate Resiliency and Heat Island Impact Analysis associated with the proposed data center campus development? If so, please provide copies of any completed studies and an anticipated timeline for any studies still in progress. b. Will the petitioner prepare a public-facing Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document addressing environmental and operational topics associated with the proposed data center campus, including but not limited to the proposed air-cooled chillers, rooftop units (RTUs), tier classification and operation of backup generators, evaluation of cleaner alternatives to traditional diesel backup generators, operation of the proposed closed-loop cooling system, anticipated water consumption and recycling measures, and the types of chemicals or treatment agents proposed to be utilized within the cooling and mechanical systems? Soundscape Engineering 3711 N. Ravenswood Ave., Ste. 104 • Chicago, IL 60613 • (312) 436-0032 729 W. Ann Arbor Trl., Ste. 150 • Plymouth, MI 48170 • (734) 418-8663 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com MEMORANDUM May 8, 2026 To: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director, United City of Yorkville, knoble@yorkville.il.us From: Aimee Lalime, INCE Bd. Cert. Re: C1 Yorkville CHI 11 Proposed Data Center Campus and On-site Substations Development Review of Initial Sound Study Dated April 22, 2026 C1 Yorkville LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of CyrusOne, is seeking approval from the United City of Yorkville for development of CHI 11, a 228-acre data center campus and on-site substation development. The original PUD was approved on July 9, 2024, and C1 Yorkville has submitted a major change to the PUD, including an updated initial sound study dated April 22, 2026. The City requested this initial sound study to have the elements described below; our comments regarding each of these elements are shown in blue. 1. Conduct a site noise survey to establish the existing ambient noise environment in the vicinity of the development including the following: a. Measure at locations representative of closest residences to the project at one or more locations in each of the 4 compass directions b. At least one of the measurements in each compass direction shall be at least 24 hours in duration to capture the daytime and nighttime levels c. Additional measurements could be short-duration (15-30 minutes) at the discretion of the project's acoustic consultant. d. Conduct 24-hour measurements at the closest residential subdivision The site noise survey measured sound levels near the roadways bordering the proposed site in 3 of the 4 compass directions at locations A, B, and C. Sound levels were not measured in the north cardinal direction, likely because the closest residence to the north is approximately 2500 feet away. The sound levels were measured for the appropriate durations. While the distances between the measurement locations and the closest roadway or railway were not stated in the report, these measurements appear to be too close to the roadway for the measured Leq (equivalent sound pressure) levels to be representative of the sound levels at the nearest residences (Figure 1 in the Study). However, the study also provided L90 levels, which is the sound level exceeded 90% of the time. In this case, traffic and other transient noise sources are effectively ignored in the L90, making it a more applicable metric to describe the background noise level at the nearest residences. CyrusOne Data Center – Initial Sound Study Review May 8, 2026 SE No. 2234 Page 2 of 3 Soundscape Engineering 3711 N. Ravenswood Ave., Ste. 104 • Chicago, IL 60613 • (312) 436-0032 729 W. Ann Arbor Trl., Ste. 150 • Plymouth, MI 48170 • (734) 418-8663 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com 2. Generate an initial 3D computer model (SoundPLAN, CadnaA, or similar) of the project using the tentative site plan as follows: a. Use representative sound power levels for the mechanical equipment in the planned cooling scheme (generators during routine testing, chillers, RTUs, AHUs, fans, cooling towers, etc.) b. Model peak operation during nighttime hours (and daytime if equipment is planned to operate in a quieter mode during nighttime hours). c. Consider tonality of noise sources and apply the 10-dB penalty to those types of noise sources. d. Describe mitigation methods that may be needed to comply with the City noise ordinance. 1) The computer model included air-cooled chillers, RTUs, back-up generators, and UPS fans. However, it did not specify the number of chillers or fans planned per building. As such, there is insufficient detail for us to review the calculations. We ask that the Petitioner provide additional information on the quantities of equipment per building. 2) The project is noted to include substation transformers, but their noise contribution does not appear to have been included in the model. We ask the Petitioner to provide the transformer sound levels and include them in the initial model. 3) The Study assumes that it is possible to select chillers and mitigation such that the attenutated chillers have no prominent discrete tones. This has yet to be demonstrated. In the final noise study, the analysis is required to be conducted based upon actual measured sound levels for the selected chillers. It is likely that the manufacturer will need to conduct new sound level measurements prior to permitting in order to provide sound levels that are not empirically derived. Tonality should be assessed based on these measurements and at the planned operating speeds. If attenuators are expected to affect equipment tonality, we recommend that the testing be conducted with and without attenuators installed. 4) The acoustic model includes several different noise mitigation measures, including approximately 15-foot-tall rooftop barriers, chiller inlet and discharge attenuators, generator enclosures, and a generator yard barrier. Generator mufflers will be required, and compressor wraps may also be needed, to meet the noise ordinance thresholds. 3. Issue report(s) to document the ambient measurements and initial modeling results. While the report provided sound levels at discrete locations, it did not include a contour map of the noise transmissions into the surrounding neighborhood, which is standard practice for documenting SoundPLAN results and allows us to visually review source locations. We ask that the Petitioner provide a contour map of the predicted noise transmission to the neighborhood. The report noted that the IPCB limits from Class C to Class A land were applied. While enforcement of the IPCB ordinance is outside Yorkville’s jurisdiction, the project is well-advised to comply. We note that this property would be considered Class B land, in our interpretation of IPCB’s Title 35 documentation. (Part 901 lists Information services and data processing industries, Code 4240, as Class B.) CyrusOne Data Center – Initial Sound Study Review May 8, 2026 SE No. 2234 Page 3 of 3 Soundscape Engineering 3711 N. Ravenswood Ave., Ste. 104 • Chicago, IL 60613 • (312) 436-0032 729 W. Ann Arbor Trl., Ste. 150 • Plymouth, MI 48170 • (734) 418-8663 www.SoundscapeEngineering.com The purpose of this initial study was to give the project an opportunity to define noise mitigation challenges early on and change the site layout if needed to facilitate noise mitigation. In general, the listed mitigations are of the appropriate scale and type to allow the project to meet the noise ordinance. However, additional information is needed for us to review the Study findings, as noted above. The City also requested that the Petitioner provide predicted sound levels at 26 residential locations for use in a cumulative noise study. The report notes that the sound levels at the Study receivers fall at least 4 dB below the Code requirements. Since three data center developments have approved PUDs, sound levels of this magnitude could still contribute to an overall exceedance. We ask that the Petitioner provide the predicted sound levels at each of the 26 residential locations requested. **END OF MEMORANDUM** Sold To: United City of Yorkville - 119899 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Bill To: United City of Yorkville - 119899 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Certificate of Publication: Order Number: 75377 Purchase Order: PUBLIC HEARING PZC 2026-03 State of Illinois - Kendall Chicago Tribune Media Group does hereby certify that it is the publisher of the Aurora Beacon News Classified. The Aurora Beacon News Classified is a secular newspaper, has been continuously published Daily for more than fifty (50) weeks prior to the first publication of the attached notice, is published in the City of Aurora, Township of Aurora, State of Illinois, is of general circulation throughout that county and surrounding area, and is a newspaper as defined by 715 IL CS 5/5. This is to certify that a notice, a true copy of which is attached, was published 1 time(s) in the Aurora Beacon News Classified. The first publication of the notice was made in the newspaper, dated and published on 5/22/2026, and the last publication of the notice was made in the newspaper dated and published on 5/22/2026. This notice was also placed on a statewide public notice website as required by 715 ILCS 5/2. 1. PUBLICATION DATES: 22 May 2026. Aurora Beacon News Classified In witness, an authorized agent of The Chicago Tribune Media Group has signed this certificate executed in Chicago, Illinois on this 23 May 2026, by Chicago Tribune Company _________________________________________ Jeremy Gates Page 1 of 5 Page 2 of 5 Page 3 of 5 Page 4 of 5 Page 5 of 5 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memorandum. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Economic Development Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number New Business #6 Tracking Number EDC 2026-31 Project Cardinal (Pioneer) – Annexation Agreement Amendment & MOU Approval Economic Development Committee – June 2, 2026 CC – 11/10/25 Approval of Annexation Agreement PZC 2025-08 & EDC 2025-50 Supermajority (6 out of 9) Approval Request for annexation agreement amendment to extend closing notice deadline and approval of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department 1 REQUEST SUMMARY: Matt McCarron, applicant, on behalf of Pioneer Development, LLC, as the petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting an amendment to an Annexation Agreement, approved November 10, 2025 via Ordinance No. 2025-78 (the “Annexation Agreement”) to extend the closing notice deadline for the Cardinal data center project from July 1, 2026 to December 31, 2027. While the annexation agreement pertained to the overall development of the approximately 1,034-acre data center campus, the property subject to the original annexation petition consisted of seven (7) parcels totaling approximately 305 acres and is generally located northwest of IL Route 47 and Galena Road, south of Baseline Road, and east of Ashe Road, as depicted below. The land is currently undeveloped and used for farming. The purpose of this first amendment to the annexation agreement is to provide adequate time for the petitioner to acquire title to the subject parcels for the future development of the approved data center campus. Memorandum To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Sara Mendez, Senior Planner David Hansen, Senior Planner Date: May 28, 2026 Subject: Project Cardinal – Annexation Agreement Amendment & MOU Approval Requested Extension to Closing Notice Deadline 2 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT AMENDMENT: The City Council approved an Annexation Agreement with Pioneer Development, LLC, the contract purchaser of the subject property, in November 2025 via Ordinance 2025-78. Section 9 of the agreement provides that all entitlement approval ordinances and ancillary agreements shall be held by the City until such time as Pioneer Development, LLC acquires title to the subject property. Accordingly, the annexation agreement and all ancillary agreements will not be filed or recorded until the City receives notice that the property closing has occurred, and the developer has acquired the property. The agreement established a deadline of July 1, 2026, for receipt of the closing notice, after which the annexation agreement would become null and void if such notice was not received. However, due to unforeseen circumstances beyond the petitioner’s control, Pioneer Development, LLC is unable to meet the July 1, 2026 deadline to acquire the subject property and has therefore requested an extension to provide notice of closing to the City on or before December 31, 2027. Should the notice not be received by that deadline, the annexation agreement and ancillary agreements shall become null and void unless otherwise extended by the Mayor and City Council. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING: In consideration of the proposed Amendment to the Annexation Agreement extending the closing notice deadline from July 1, 2026 to December 31, 2027, there are ancillary agreements previously approved by the City Council related to the data center campus development that also reference the original July 1, 2026 closing deadline. These agreements include the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement (Ord. 2025-77) and the Utility and Infrastructure Agreement and Development Agreement (Ord. 2026-23). Accordingly, the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) establishes that, should the Amendment to the Annexation Agreement extending the closing notice deadline to December 31, 2027 be approved, the deadlines contained within these ancillary agreements shall likewise coincide with the revised deadline established in the First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement. Finally, the Memorandum of Understanding further clarifies the obligations of the City and Pioneer Development, LLC with respect to estimated water usage and the penalties to be imposed under the Utility and Infrastructure Agreement should actual water usage exceed the established average gallons per day (42,000 GPD) or maximum gallons per day (71,400 GPD). Accordingly, the City and Pioneer Development, LLC agree that Section 4.1 of the Utility and Infrastructure Agreement shall be implemented as follows: “The City shall charge for water and sewer services based on actual usage in accordance with the then-existing tariff rates charged to industrial customers for similar water and sewer services. Water usage shall be monitored concurrently with the City’s utility billing cycle; provided however, in the event the usage exceeds the average daily estimates of 42,000 gallons for each utility billing cycle, the City shall impose a penalty equal to two times the then-existing volumetric water rate on the difference between the actual average day and the estimated average day of 42,000 gallons for the entire billing cycle. In addition, if the water usage of any one day exceeds 71,400 gallons, the City shall impose a penalty of two times the then-existing volumetric water rate until compliance with the water allocation standards are met or further improvements to the water service system are completed at the sole cost of the Developer. The Infrastructure Project will provide water and sewer services at the Project site boundary.” STAFF COMMENTS: The proposed amendment to the Annexation Agreement and the proposed Memorandum of Understanding are necessary to provide the developer with sufficient time to take possession of the 3 subject property without violating the terms of the existing Annexation Agreement and related ancillary agreements. In addition, the Memorandum of Understanding is intended to further clarify the implementation of penalties that may be assessed by the City should water usage at the data center campus exceed the thresholds established in the Utility and Infrastructure Agreement. A public hearing is scheduled before the City Council on June 9, 2026 with a tentative final vote expected at the June 23, 2026 meeting. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, the Petitioner and staff will be available at Tuesday night’s meeting. Attachments: 1.Draft Amended Annexation Agreement 2.Draft Memorandum of Understanding 3.Copy of Petitioner’s Application 4.Public Hearing Notice First Amend to Annex Agm Pioneer Development 5.5.26 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO NOVEMBER 10, 2025, BY AND BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND PIONEER DEVELOPMENT, LLC (“PROJECT CARDINAL”) WHEREAS, the City of Yorkville (the “City”) and Pioneer Development, LLC entered into the above stated Annexation Agreement on or about the 10th day of November, 2025; and WHEREAS, due to unforeseen circumstances the Developer is not able to close on the Subject Property on or before July 1, 2026, as set forth in the Annexation Agreement; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City and the Developer that the Annexation Agreement be amended to extend time for which Developer is to provide its “Closing Notice.”. NOW THEREFORE FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION THE RECEIPT AND SUFFICIENCY OF WHICH ARE ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER BE IT AGREED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS The Recitals set forth above are incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section 1. SECTION 2. AMENDMENT That the last sentence of Section 9 of the Annexation Agreement be and is hereby deleted and the following inserted in its place: In the event that the City Clerk does not receive the Closing Notice on or before December 31, 2027, then this Agreement shall be null and void and the City Clerk shall not thereafter record this Agreement unless otherwise extended by the City acting through its Mayor and City Council.” SECTION 3. EFFECT ON REMAINING PROVISIONS First Amend to Annex Agm Pioneer Development 5.5.26 2 Except as expressly set forth herein all the terms and conditions of the Annexation Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. RECORDING This First Amendment shall be recorded by the City Clerk at such time as the Annexation Agreement is recorded. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE An Illinois Municipal Corporation By:_______________________________ Its Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk PIONEER DEVELOPMENT, LLC By:_______________________________ Memorandum of Understanding Pioneer Development Redline 5.21.26 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH RESPECT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THE UTILITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AND PIONEER DEVELOPMENT LLC (“PROJECT CARDINAL”) This Memorandum of Understanding is made and entered into this _____day of June, 2026 by and between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”) and Pioneer Development, LLC (the “Developer”). WHEREAS, the City and Developer entered into a certain Planned Unit Development Agreement dated November 10, 2025 (the “PUD Agreement”) providing for the development of the 1037 acres specifically identified in the PUD Agreement (the “Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the PUD Agreement contemplated the City and the Developer coming to terms on a Utility and Infrastructure Agreement and a Development Agreement (collectively, the “Agreements”) on or before July 1, 2026; and WHEREAS, the City and the Developer have come to terms on the Agreements as evidenced by the approval of the Mayor and City Council of the Agreements on March 10, 2026, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2026-23; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Clerk have executed these Agreements on behalf of the City; and WHEREAS, the City and the Developer have agreed that the Developer will execute the Agreements when the Developer acquires title to the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the City and the Developer have agreed to extend the date by which the Developer must issue its “Closing Notice” of the date to acquire title to the Subject Property pursuant to the terms of the Annexation Agreement as set forth in the First Amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding Pioneer Development Redline 5.21.26 2 Annexation Agreement between the Developer and the City as heretofore approved by the Corporate Authorities; and WHEREAS, the Preamble to Ordinance No. 2025-77 approving the PUD Agreement and Section 4.1 of the PUD Agreement provide that the Utility and Development Agreements are to be executed by July 1, 2026. Whereas, the City and the Developer hereby agree that the provision in Section 1.4 of the PUD Agreement that the Developer execute the Utility and Infrastructure Agreement on or before July 1, 2026 and in the Preamble of Ordinance No. 2025-77 that the Agreements must be executed before July 1, 2026 do not reflect the current intention of the Parties and that it is hereby agreed by City and the Developer and that the execution of the Utility Agreement and Development Agreement shall coincide with the Developer’s acquisition of title to the Subject Property after the issuance of Closing Notice as provided in the Annexation Agreement as amended by the First Amendment. Whereas, the City and the Developer have reviewed the City obligations as set forth in Section 4.1 in the Utility and Infrastructure Agreement regarding the estimated usage of water by the Developer to serve the Subject Property (the “Water Allocation”) and the penalties to be imposed upon the Developer in the event the usage exceeds the average gallons per day or maximum gallons per day as provided in Section 4.1 and have determined that it is in their mutual best interest to clarify the obligations of the City and the Developer with regard to water usage. Wherefore, the City and the Developer agree that Section 4.1 of the Utility and Infrastructure Agreement shall be implemented as follows: 4.1 Water Allocation. The City acknowledges that the provisions of adequate amounts of potable water is essential for the development of the Project. The City will Memorandum of Understanding Pioneer Development Redline 5.21.26 3 provide water for use at Development Site in accordance with the following table and by the applicable Delivery Date (the “Water Allocation”): (Average Day) (Maximum Day) Water 42,000 gallons per day 71,400 gallons per day The City shall charge for water and sewer services based on actual usage in accordance with the then-existing tariff rates charged to industrial customers for similar water and sewer services. Water usage shall be monitored concurrently with the City’s utility billing cycle; provided however, in the event the usage exceeds the average daily estimates of 42,000 gallons for each utility billing cycle, the City shall impose a penalty equal to two times the then-existing volumetric water rate on the difference between the actual average day and the estimated average day of 42,000 gallons for the entire billing cycle. In addition, if the water usage of any one day exceeds 71,400 gallons, the City shall impose a penalty of two times the then-existing volumetric water rate until compliance with the water allocation standards are met or further improvements to the water service system are completed at the sole cost of the Developer. The Infrastructure Project will provide water and sewer services at the Project site boundary. Memorandum of Understanding Pioneer Development Redline 5.21.26 4 Now Therefore, Pioneer Development, LLC and the United City of Yorkville hereby agree to all of the understandings as hereabove set forth. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE An Illinois Municipal Corporation By:_______________________________ Its Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Clerk PIONEER DEVELOPMENT, LLC By:_______________________________ UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO.2025-75 AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS APPROVING AN ANNEXATION AGREEMENT FOR CERTAIN TERRITORY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASELINE ROAD AND OF NORTH BRIDGE STREET Project Cardinal) Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois This 101' day of November, 2025 Prepared by and Return to: United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Published in pamphlet form by the authority of the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois on November 14, 2025. Ordinance No. 2025-78 AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS APPROVING AN ANNEXATION AGREEMENT FOR CERTAIN TERRITORY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASELINE ROAD AND OF NORTH BRIDGE STREET Project Cardinal) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non -home -rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and WHEREAS, Pioneer Development, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, the contract purchaser of approximately 1,037 acres of land located west of North Bridge Street Illinois State Route 47), east of Ashe Road, and directly south of East Baseline Road (the Development Site") upon which Pioneer Development, LLC ("Pioneer") proposes to develop a secured data center campus (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, Pioneer and any electors, if applicable, will petition the City to annex approximately 305 acres legally described as Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"), and all adjacent roadways pursuant to Section 7-1-8 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 517-1-8); and WHEREAS, in furtherance of said petition, the City and Pioneer have negotiated an Annexation Agreement, in the form attached hereto and as of the date Pioneer becomes the title holder of record of the Property, Pioneer and its successors and assigns shall assume all rights and obligations as set forth in this Annexation Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Property is contiguous to the corporate boundaries of the City and is not within the corporate boundaries of any other municipality; and WHEREAS, the Property is located within the Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District and all parties have been given notice of the annexation of the Property as required by Section 7- 1-1 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/7-1- 1); and Ordinance No. 2025-78 Page 2 WHERAS, as required by Section 11-15.1-1 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-1), a public hearing was held on June 10, 2025, by the Mayor and City Council (the Corporate Authorities") on this Annexation Agreement after the publication of notice as required by Section 11-15.1-3 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-3); and WHEREAS, in connection with this petition for annexation, Pioneer has submitted an application to the City requesting rezoning and a special use planned unit development at the Development Site which the City has found to be complete and consistent with the City's purpose and intent of the planned unit development and policies for industrial development within the City; and WHEREAS, the City's Unified Development Ordinance addresses requirements that must be met for development; and WHEREAS, the City has engaged in the following activities relating to the application of Pioneer and consistent with City codes: DATE ITEM PURPOSE DOCUMENT LINK Request for Annexation, Rezoning, and PUD approval includes: I. Project Introduction 2. Applications for annexation, rezoning, PUD and Special Use — and responses to standards Project Cardinal Application packet Initial 3. Conceptual Plan littps://www.yorkville.il.us/DocumentCenter/ March 14, Application 4. Building elevations View/ 1 1328/PROJECT-CARDINAL- 2025 submittal 5. Landscape plan APPLICATION-PACKAGE--- 6. Traffic Impact Analysis 20250314?bidld=) 7, Stormwater Calculations 8. Security fencing 9. Annexation Map 10. Legal Description 11. Consent of Owners 12. Contiguous Owners Public facing webpage providing Project Page anticipated meeting schedule, Project Cardinal Project Pa e March 21, created and description of project and requested https://www.yorkville.il.us/906/Project- 2025 published on entitlements, as well as links to all Cardinal -Data -Center -Campus -Anne) City's website documents. Website updated consistently with new ap lication Ordinance No. 2025-78 Page 3 DATE ITEM PURPOSE DOCUMENT LINK materials. o Annexation Application https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/I 1330/21---Annexation- Application--- Update?bidId=) o Rezoning Application https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/ 11331 /31---Rezoning- March 24, Revised Application --- Update?bidId=) Application Updated application materials o PUD Application 2025 submittal https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/11332/41--- PUD- Application --- Update?bidId=) o Preliminary PUD Application https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/ 11334/191---Prelim- PUD-Plan?bidId=) March 27, City response to email from the o 03-27-25 Email to EIizabeth 2025 Correspondence public — Elizabeth Fotopoulous. Fotopoulous o Meeting Packet Agenda attached as April 10, p Plan Council Staff Level technical review of 4-10-25 Plan Council Agenda & project with the applicant/ Pioneer Packet4-7-25 2025 Meeting not open to public) revised o Meeting Minutes attached as "Plan Council April 10, 2025" Staff Memo attached as "EDC _5-6-25_Project Cardinal_ Annex, Rezone, PUD & Preliminary Plan" o EDC 5-6-25 Packet https:// www.yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe nter/ ViewFil e/Item/6225 ) Informal feedback from o EDC 5-6-25 Meeting Minutes https:// www,yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe Economicsubcommitteeofelectedofficialsnonter/ViewFile/Item/6304) May 6, 2025 Development quorum at meeting but presentation to o EDC 5-6-25 Meeting Audio Committeepublicliven — no committee action https:// www.yorkville.il.us/Document Meeting taken and rescheduled to June 3, Center/ View/11441/Economic- 2025) Development- Audio --- May-6-2025 - MP3) o Petitioner Presentation https:// www,yorkville.il.us/Document C enter/ Vi ew/ 11426/2 5 0 5 0 5 -Pro j ect- CardinalArch- Progress- Set compressed?bidId= May 14, City response to email from public - o Attached as "DATA CENTER 2025 Correspondence Scott Stafford. OPPOSITION EMAIL 5-14-25" Ordinance No. 2025-78 Page 4 DATE ITEM PURPOSE DOCUMENT LINK o Application Section 15.1 - Conti&truous Owners for Kane & Kendall Counties https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document C enter/View/ 11522/Application- Section-151---Contiguous- Owners?bidId=) a Plan Council Response Letter https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/ 11523/Proj ect-Cardinal--- Application revised to include nearby Plan -Council -Response --- Revised property owners in Kane County, 53025?bidId=) May 30, Application response to Plan Council meeting o Traffic Methodology Memo 2025 submittal comments, Traffic Methodology https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Memo, updated landscape plan, site Center/View/l 1524/Proj ect-Cardinal--- plan and elevations Traffic-Methodology-Memo- 002?bidId=) o Landscapin Plan https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/ 11525/Proj ect-Cardinal--- Landscaping-002?bidId=) o Site Plan and Building -Elevations https://www.yorkville.il.us/Docament C enter/View/ 11526/Proj ect-Cardinal--- 5 3 025 -Drawing-Set-002?bidId=) Economic a EDC 6-3-25 Packet June 3, 2025 Development Committee Meeting cancelled no quorum https://www.yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe nter/ViewPile/Item/6266) Meeting Per Plan Council recommendation, Pioneer sent letter on June 2, 2025 to Pioneer outreach nearby property owners along Galena June 5, 2025 letter & resident Road, Ashe Road, Baseline Road and Attached as "Ltr to Property Owners" in the Bristol Bay subdivision inviting meeting them to a community meeting to review the plans for the proposed data center and ask questions. Staff Memo attached as "CCPH 6-10- 25_Project Cardinal —Annexation Agreement 6-5-25" o CC 6-10-25 Packet https://www.york-ville.il.us/ArchiveCe June 10, City Council — Public hearing for Annexation nter/ViewFile/Item/6268) CC 6-10-25 Meeting Minutes 2025 Public Hearing Agreement o https://www.yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe nter/ViewFile/Item/6322) o CC 6-10-25 Meeting Audio https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/ 115 5 7/City-Council- Audi o---June-10 -202 5 -MP 3 ) Ordinance No. 2025-78 Page 5 DATE ITEM PURPOSE DOCUMENT LINK o Petitioner Presentation Materials at 6/10/25 City Council Meeting https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Cent er/View/ 11596/Annexation- Meeting Developer- Presentation?bidld=) REQUIRED PUBLIC NOTICES o Published in paper on May 23, 2025 affidavit of publication attached as 7815891 Affidavit" o Notices to Township & Fire District sent on May 20, 2025 (certified mailing receipts attached as "Certified Mailing Receipts _PC2025-08_CC PH 6-10-25") Staff Memo attached as "PZC_6-11- 25_Project Cardinal —Rezone, PUD & Preliminary Plan" o PZC 6-11-25 Packet https://www.yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe nterNiewFile/Item/6310) o PZC 6-11-25 Meeting Minutes & Transcript littps://www.yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe nterNiewFile/Item/6344) a PZC 6-11-25 Meeting Audio Public hearing for Rezoning and https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Planning & Special Use for a PUD. Also review CenterNiew/11559/Planning-and- June 11, Zoning and recommendation of a Preliminary Zoning -Commission -Audio --- June-11- 2025 Commission PUD plan. The Planning and Zoning 2025-MP3) Meeting Commission continued the public REQUIRED PUBLIC NOTICES hearing to Wednesday, July 9, o Published in paper on May 23, 2025 2025. affidavit of publication attached as 7816015 Affidavit" o Certified Affidavit of Mailing by petitioner on May 22, 2025 (attached as "Certified Affidavit of Mailiug_Project Cardinal —May 22, 2025") o Green cards and certified recei is available to send by separate e-mail if needed (file is too large to attach) Ordinance No. 2025-78 Page 6 DATE ITEM PURPOSE DOCUMENT LINK Staff Memo attached as "EDC 7-1-25_Project Cardinal_ Rezone, PUD & Preliminary Plan" o EDC 7-1-25 Packet https://www.yorlcville.il.us/ArchiveCe nter/ViewFile/Item/6302) Economic Informal feedback from o EDC 7-1-25 Minutes July 1, 2025 Development subcommittee of elected officials https://www.yorkville.il.us/ArcliiveCe Committee nt erl ViewFile/Item/6371) o EDC 7-1-25 Audio https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/ l 1597/Economic- D evelopment-Audio---July-1-2025- MP3) o Site Plan and Building Elevations https-://www.yorkville.il.us/Document CenterNiew/ 11599/250703 -Proj ect- Cardinal_Arch-Drawing-S et_S ite- Plan?bidId—) o Architectural Perspective https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/1 1605/250625-Project- Cardinal_ Persp ectives_reduced?bidId= o Landscape Plans https:// www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/ View/ l 1603/Prelim-Campus- Updated site plan, building Landscape-Concept-7- Supplemental elevations, architectural renderings, 02_reduced?bidId=) July 3, 2025 Application landscape plan, landscape buffer o Landscape Buffer Elevation materials elevation, wetland delineation report, https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document photometric plan, preliminary sound Center/View111604/Project-Cardinal--- study 02---ELEVATIONS?bidId=) o Wetland Delineation Report https:// www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/ View/11601/17635QProjectCa rdinal_ WDR_05232025?bidId=) o Photometric Plan https: l/www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/ View/ 11602/250701-Proj ect- Cardinal_ Site-plan_PGE?bidId=) o Prelimina Sound Stud https:// www.yorkville.il.us/Document C enterlView/ 11600/ 182671---Proj ect- Cardinal--- Sound-Study- 070125? bidId=) Ordinance No. 2025-78 Page 7 DATE ITEM PURPOSE DOCUMENT LINK Staff Memo attached as "PZC _7-9-25_Project Cardinal_ Rezone, PITD & Preliminary Plan final" o PZC 7- 9-25 Packet https://www.yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe nter/ViewFile/Item/6310) o PZC 7-9-25 Minutes & Transcript https://www.yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe nter/ViewFile/Item/6395) o PZC 7-9-25 Audio Planning & https://www.yorlcville.il.us/Documeiit July 9, 2025 Zoning Continued public hearing Center/View/I 1614/Planning-and- Commission Zoning-Commis Sion-Audio---July-9- 2025-MP3) o Petitioner's Presentation https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/ 11613/PZC-Hearing- 2?bidld=) o Updated Sound Study https://www.yorkville,il.us/Document Center/View/ 11620/182671--- Project - Cardinal ---Sound-Stud -Revl?bidld—) o Updated Traffic Study dated July 21 2025 July 21, Supplemental Application Updated Traffic Study https://www.yorkville.il.us/Dorument 2025 materials Center/View/l1640/ddf7c8ce-3682- 45e4-99f4-8ffcabe62502?bidld=) Staff Memo attached as "CC _7-22-25_Project Cardinal Rezone, PUD & Preliminary Plan —revised" o CC 7-22-25 Packet https://www.yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe Discussion item with Planning and nter/ViewFile/Item/6360) July 22, City Council ZoningCommisssion o CC 7-22-25 Minutes 2025 recommendations and adoption of https://www.yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe findings of facts nter/ViewFile/Item/6394) r o CC 7-22- 25 Audio https://www.york-villc.il.us/Docuxnent C enter/View/ 11645/City-Council- Audio---July-22-2025 -MP3 ) o Pioneer Development - Protect Cardinal Sound Study Initial Sound Study Presentations by Presentation (Burns McDonnell) August 12, 2025 City Council Petitioner and City Sound https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/l1665/Pioneer- Engineering Consultant Development --- Sound-Study.7 bidld=) o Peer Review of Project Cardinal's Initial Sound Stud Ordinance No. 2025-78 Page 8 DATE ITEM PURPOSE DOCUMENT LINK Presentation (Soundscape Engineering) https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/11666/Soundscape- Pres entation---Project-Cardinal-Initial- Sound-Study-Review --- 8-11-25- 002?bidld=) o CC 8-12-25 Minutes https://www.yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe nter/ViewFile/Item1643 5) o CC 8-26-25 Packet https://www.yorkville.il.us/Ai-chiveCe nter/ViewFile/Item/6401) o CC 8-26-25 Minutes August 26, City Council General discussion item https://www.yorkville.il.us/ArebiveCe 2025 nter/ViewFile/Item/6436) c CC 8-26-25 Audio https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document C enter/View/ 11645 /City-C ouncil- Audio---Jul-22- 2025-MP3) o Updated Site Plan dated 8/26/ 2025 https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/11734IProj ect-Cardinal- Site-Plan-82625?bidId=) o Updated Landscape Plan dated 8/26/2025 August 27, Supplemental Updated site plan, landscape plan, and https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document 2025 Application sound study follow-up Center/View/11735/Project-Cardinal--- materials 02 --- Landscape --- 82625?bidId=) o Sound Study Follow-up responses dated Aup st 27, 2025 https:I/www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/1 1736/Project-Cardinal- Sound- Stud -U date-82725?bidId=) o Emergency Sound Level Contours dBA https:// www.yorkville.il.us/Document C enter/View/ 1 1746/Figure-5 --- September Supplemental Application Additional sound study information Emergency- Noise-Levels- dBA. bidld=) 5, 2025 materials and water usage memo o Project Cardinal - Water Usa e Memo ( https://www.yorkville.il.us/Do cumentCenter/ View/11747/Proj ect- Cardinal- Memo---Water?bidId=) Staff Memo attached as "CC _9-9-25_Project Cardinal Rezone, PUD & Preliminary September City Council General Discussion Item Plan 9, 2025 revised" o CC 9-9-25 Packet https:// www.yorkville.1l.us/ArchiveCe Ordinance No. 2025-78 Page 9 DATE ITEM PURPOSE DOCUMENT LINK nter/ViewFile/Item/6416) o CC 9-9-25 Minutes https://www.yorkville.il.us/Arel-liveCe nter/ViewFile/Item/6445) a CC 9-9-25 Audio https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/ 11766/City-Council- Audio---September-9-2025-MP 3 ) o CC 9-23- 25 Packet https://www.yorkville-il.us/Arel-liveCe nt er/ViewFile/Item/6441) o CC 9-23-25 Minutes https://www.yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe nter/ViewFile/Item/6465) September City Council Presentation by Petitioner and general o CC 9-23-25 Audio 23, 2025 discussion item https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/View/11927/City-Council- Audio--- September-23-2025-MP3) o Petitioner's Presentation https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document CenterNiew/ 11922/CRG---Yorkvill e- Cit -Council-Meeting?bidId=) o Updated Site Plan, Building Elevations and Architectural Renderings _dated 9/30/25 https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document C enter/View/ 11979/250930-Proj ect- Supplemental Updated site plan, elevations, Cardinal —Arch compressedl0l?bidId= October 1, Application architectural renderings, and 2025 materials landscape plan c Updated Landscape Plan dated 9/26/2025 https-://www.yorkville.il.us/Document Center/Vi ew/ l 19 80/Proj ect-Cardinal--- BMCD--- Landscape 101 ?bidId=) Staff Memo attached as "CC_10-14- 25_Project Cardinal —Rezone, PUD & Preliminary Plan revised" a CC 10-14-25 Packet https://www.yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe nter/ViewFile/Item/6463) October 14, City Council General Discussion Item a CC 10- 14-25 Minutes (not available 2025 yet) o CC 10-14- 25 Audio https://www.yorkville.1l.us/Document Center/View/ 12194/City-Council- Audio---Octob er-14-202 5-MP3 ) Ordinance No. 2025-78 Page 10 DATE ITEM PURPOSE DOCUMENT LINK o Updated Traffic Impact Study dated October 20, 2025 October 20, Supplemental https-://www.yorlcville.il.us/Docuinent 2025 Application Updated Traffic Impact Study Center/View/12207/Project-Cardinal--- materials Traffic-Impact-Study_V2 2025-10- 20?bidld=) o CC 10-28-25 Packet https://www.yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe nter/ViewFile/Item/6479) o CC 10-28-25 Minutes (not available October 28, City Council Recommended City Council Vote on yet) 2025 Annexation and PUD agreements o CC 10-28-25 Audio https://www.yorkville.il.us/Document CenterlView/12215/City-Council- Audio --- October-2 8 -2025 -MP3 ) Address Community Comments and o 10-30- 25 Email to Baumgartner - October 30, 2025 Correspondence City Council Updated Traffic study attached o CC 10-30-25 Memo and results - results attached o Section 3.10 of the PUD Agreement — page 746 https://www,yorkville.il.us/ArchiveCe November 3, 2025 Supplemental materials Requirements for Emergency Plan nter/ViewFil e/Item/6479) c Updated Project Cardinal Phasing Plan https://www.yorkville.it.us/DocumentNovemberSupplemental Updated Phasing Flan5, 2025 materials CenterlView/12247/Project-Cardinal- Phasing-Plan ---11525?bidId=) WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have reviewed all of the foregoing information relating to the proposed development of the Project and the use of the Development Site; and WHEREAS, all of the foregoing information has been provided to the public when required by law and has again been provided as part of the meeting packet for this November 10, 2025 meeting; and WHEREAS, in addition to the foregoing, City Staff has responded to private communications from certain property owners in the City and even outside the City relating to the Property, which are contained in the included hyperlink (Project Cardinal Project Page) https://www.yorkville.it.us/906/Project-Cardinal-Data-Center-Campus-Anne); and Ordinance No. 2025-78 Page 11 WHEREAS, to establish the specific development standards, regulations, limitations and conditions regarding the development of the Project and the use of the Development Site, the City and Pioneer have negotiated a Planned Unit Development Agreement (the "PUD Agreement') substantially in the form attached hereto, setting forth all development regulations and conditions for the construction and operation of the Project; and WHEREAS, in order to proceed with the Project, as proposed, Pioneer and the City will enter into an Annexation Agreement providing, among other things, the terms and conditions pertaining to the annexation of the Property as a part of the Development Site and terms and conditions of the construction and operation of the Project; WHEREAS, in addition to an Annexation Agreement and the PUD Agreement the City and Pioneer are prepared to enter into a Development Agreement pertaining to the obligations of Pioneer regarding the Project and a Utility and Infrastructure Agreement providing for the obligations of Pioneer for all public infrastructure including utilities and roadways; WHEREAS, after due and careful consideration the Corporate Authorities have concluded that the annexation of the Property is in the best interests of the City but only in the event the conditions and contingencies as hereinafter set forth (the "Conditions") are fully satisfied on or before July 1, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Conditions include that the Annexation Agreement will not be effective until the Development Agreement and the Utility and Infrastructure Agreement are executed and effective. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are incorporated and made a part of this Ordinance. Ordinance No. 2025-78 Page 12 Section 2. The Annexation Agreement attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as Exhibit A, be and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver said Annexation Agreement which shall be effective only upon satisfaction of the following Conditions: a) Acquisition of the Property by Pioneer, or its assignee if assignment is permitted by the Annexation Agreement, and all of the acreage required for the Project (collectively the "Development Site") and recordation of all instruments of conveyance granting Pioneer fee simple title to the Development Site; b) Approval by the Corporate Authorities of a certain Planned Unit Development Agreement covering the Development Site and execution thereof by Pioneer and the City on or before July 1, 2026; c) Approval by the Corporate Authorities of a certain Development Agreement covering the Development Site and execution thereof by Pioneer and the City on or before July 1, 2026; d) Approval by the Corporate Authorities of a certain Utility and Infrastructure Agreement covering all infrastructure improvements to serve and enhance the Development Site and execution thereof by Pioneer and the City on or before July 1, 2026; e) Recordation of Covenants and Restrictions covering the Development Site; and f) Recordation of this Annexation Agreement, the Planned Unit Development Agreement, the Development Agreement and the Utility and Infrastructure Agreement upon the Development Site. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this 101h day of November, A.D. 2025. Ordinance No. 2025-78 Page 13 Y CLERK KEN KOCH AYE DAN TRANSIER AYE ARDEN JOE PLOCHER AYE CRAIG SOLING ABSENT CHRIS FUNKHOUSER AYE MATT MAREK AYE RUSTY CORNEILS AYE RUSTY HYETT AYE APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkvile, Ke Zdall County, Illinois this day of (j , 4 jj , A.D. 2025. Attest: ITY CLERK MAYOR Ordinance No. 2025-78 Page 14 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ss. COUNTY OF KENDALL } ANNEXATION AGREEMENT Project Cardinal) This Annexation Agreement hereinafter ("Agreement'), is made and entered into this day of [JOVeYI Y1er 1p 2Ura by and between the United City of Yorkville, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and Pioneer Development, LLC, hereinafter referred to as "Developer". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is the contract purchaser of the real property, which is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto, consisting of approximately 305 acres, more or less (the Subject Property'); and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Developer to provide for the annexation of the Subject Property and to use the Subject Property in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the Planned Unit Development Agreement (the "PUD Agreement") attached hereto as Exhibit B, to be approved by the City concurrent with this Agreement and the Development Agreement and the Utility & Infrastructure Agreement, both of which are to be executed by the parties no later than July 1, 2026. The PUD Agreement, the Development Agreement and the Utility & Infrastructure Agreement (collectively the "Ancillary Agreements"), and the applicable ordinances of the City; and, to provide that when annexed, the Subject Property is to be zoned as M-2 General Manufacturing District with a Special Use for Planned Unit Development (the "PUD") as set forth in the Ancillary Agreements; and REDLINE (v6) 9.15.25 WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Mayor and City Council (the "Corporate Authorities) to annex the Subject Property and permit the zoning and PUD, all being pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements and the ordinances of the City; and WHEREAS, Developer and City have or will perform and execute all acts required by law to effectuate such annexation; and WHEREAS, all notices and publications as required by law relating to the zoning of the Subject Property and the Agreement have been published and given to the persons or entities entitled thereto, pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Illinois Municipal Code (the Municipal Code'%; and WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the City have duly fixed the time for a public hearing on this Agreement and pursuant to legal notice have held such hearing thereon all as required by the provisions of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City has duly held all public hearings relating to zoning and the PUD, all as required by the provisions of the City's Unified Development Ordinance and the Illinois Municipal Code (the "Municipal Code'); and WHEREAS, the Developer and City agree that upon Annexation to the City of the Subject Property shall be placed in the M-2 General Manufacturing District and that a special use for Planned Unit Development be granted in conformance with Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the powers granted to the City by the provisions of Section 11-15.1-1 et seq. of the Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5111-15.1-1 et seq.), relating to Annexation Agreements, the parties hereto wish to enter into this Agreement subject to the conditions herein stated, with respect to the future annexation, zoning and development of the Subject Property and to provide for various other matters related directly or indirectly to the 2 REDLINE (v6) 9.15.25 annexation and use of the Subject Property during the term of this Agreement as authorized by -- the provisions of said statutes. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements and conditions herein contained, and by authority of and in accordance with the aforesaid statutes of the State of Illinois, the City and the Developer agree as follows: Section 1. Incorporation of Preamble and Exhibits The Preamble set forth above and all Exhibits attached hereto are incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section 1. Section 2. Annexation. Within seven (7) days after the Developer has provided the City with the Closing Notice pursuant to Section 9 of this Agreement, the Developer, and all electors, if any, shall file with the City a duly and properly petition (the "Petition") pursuant to, and in accordance with, the provisions of Section 5/7-1-1 et seq. of the Illinois Municipal Code to annex the Subject Property and any adjacent roadways not previously annexed to the City of Yorkville. Upon receipt of the Petition, the City shall adopt an ordinance annexing the Subject Property at the next meeting of the City Council. Section 3. Conditions of Annexation. A. Contemporaneously with annexation of the Subject Property , the City shall adopt an ordinance rezoning the Subject Property as M-2 General Manufacturing District and grant a Special Use Permit for the PUD in the form of Exhibit B. B. It is recognized that the Developer intends to develop a data center campus on the Subject Property. The zoning and land use entitlements for the Subject Property, as established 3 REDLINE (vb) 9.15.25 by this Agreement and the PUD are fully vested and shall survive after the twenty (20) year term of this Agreement, without any `use it or lose it' trigger, reversion, alternate use, or fallback provision, regardless of the timing or pace of development, unless the Agreement is terminated pursuant to the terms hereof prior to the expiration of its term. C. In the event that no data centers structures have been constructed, or are under construction at the Subject Property, in the 19" year of this Agreement, the City shall have the right, but not the obligation, to rezone the Subject Property for a use in conformance with the general character of the parcels surrounding the Subject Property. Developer shall not challenge, oppose or otherwise hinder any attempt by the City to rezone the Subject Property pursuant to this section. If any data center building has been constructed or is under construction before the 19th anniversary of the Effective Date this Section shall be null and void. D. This Agreement shall be conditioned upon the Developer and the City having executed the Ancillary Agreements and the City having received the Closing Notice as provided in Section 9. The City shall not make any changes to the PUD or the zoning of the Subject Property without the written consent of the Developer. E. No obligation to construct or fund any infrastructure, utilities, or public improvements, on -site or off -site, shall arise under this Agreement but shall be addressed in the Ancillary Agreements. All such obligations shall be set forth exclusively in the Ancillary Agreements, to be negotiated in good faith, and subject to mutual agreement as to commercial reasonableness of costs to be incurred by the Developer and the scope of required improvements. In the event that the Developer and the City are not able to reach 4 REDLINE (v6) 9.15.25 agreement on the Ancillary Agreements on or before July 1M26, then in that event, this Agreement shall become null and void. F. Building Permit and other fees applicable to the Subject Property shall be set forth in a Development Agreement between Developer and the City. No impact fees shall be imposed on the Subject Property other than those as set forth in the Development Agreement. G. The provisions of this Agreement and all ordinances adopted pursuant to it shall run with the land and be binding on all successor owners of record, including purchasers at a foreclosure sale, for the term stated herein. The existence of any mortgage, deed of trust or other security interest encumbering the Subject Property shall not constitute a default under this Agreement, and Developer shall have no obligation to obtain subordination or consent from any lender. H. The City shall, upon request of Developer, cooperate in good faith and execute any documentation reasonably required to enable Developer to pursue, qualify for, or obtain any state or local economic development incentive, tax credit, or exemption available under applicable law. No municipal fee, assessment, or charge shall apply to the Subject Property except as expressly set forth in the Ancillary Agreements. The City represents and warrants that there are currently no recaptures or similar charges due with respect to the Subject Property or any property subject to the PUD. Further, the City shall not subject such properties to any recapture, special assessment, special service area, or similar charges without the express written consent of the Owner. Section 4. Binding Effect and Term. 5 REDLINE (v6) 9,15.25 Upon the receipt of the Closing Notice by the City, execution of the Ancillary_ Agreements by the City and Developer and the recordation of Covenants and Restrictions, as hereinafter defined in section 12, this Annexation Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, and their successors and assigns including, but not limited to, successor owners of record, successor developers, lessees, and successor lessees, and upon any successor municipal authority of the City and the successor municipalities for a period of twenty (20) years from the later of the date of execution hereof and the date of adoption of the ordinances pursuant hereto. Section S. Notices and Remedies. Upon a breach of this Agreement, the parties hereto agree that the venue shall be the Circuit Court of Kendall County. It is further understood by the parties hereto that upon breach of this Agreement the non -defaulting party may exercise any remedy available at law or equity. A. Before any failure of any party to this Agreement to perform its obligations under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a breach of this Agreement, the party claiming such failure shall notify, in writing, by certified mail/return receipt requested, the party alleged to have failed to perform, state the obligation allegedly not performed and the performance demanded. B. In the event of a material breach of this Agreement, the Parties agree that the defaulting Party shall have sixty (60) days after notice of said breach to correct the same or diligently commence to cure said breach prior to the non -breaching Party's seeking of any remedy provided for herein. However, any breach by Developer reasonably determined by the City to involve health or safety issues may be the subject of immediate action by the City without notice 6 REDLINE (v6) 9.15.25 of sixty (60) day delay. In no event shall the City or its officers, employees, or agents be held liable for money damages. The Developer, in its discretion, may provide the City in writing with notice of the identity and address of any lender(s) holding a security interest in the Subject Property or Project. If the Developer provides such notice of any lender(s), the City shall also provide notice of any breach to such lender(s), and such lender(s) shall have the same opportunity as the Developer to cure any breach of this Agreement during the sixty (60) day cure period. In such event, the lender may assume Developer's obligations under this Agreement, and the City shall not take any enforcement action. C. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by Developer or the City is delayed or prevented by causes beyond the reasonable control of the party responsible for such performance (including, without limitation: acts of God; inclement weather; strikes or labor disputes; material shortages; supply chain disruptions; lockouts; delays in delivery of equipment or materials; delays in the provision of electric utility or transmission interconnections or capacity; regulatory changes or moratoria; governmental actions; changes in law; pandemics or public health emergencies; or any similar event), the time for such performance shall be extended by the period of such delay. D. Remedies of this Agreement shall be limited to termination or specific performance. Monetary damages are prohibited under this Agreement. E. No third party is intended to benefit from, or shall have any right to enforce, this Agreement. F. Upon any Developer default, any tender with a recorded mortgage or security interest 7 REDLINE (v6) 9.1525 shall have the independent right to cure or assume Developer's obligations under this Agreement, including through foreclosure, assignment, or step-in, without additional City approval. Section 6. Notices All notices under this Agreement shall be provided at the following addresses: To the City: United City of Yorkville 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Attn: City Administrator With a copy to: Ottosen DiNolfo Hasenbalg & Castaldo, Ltd. 2441 Warrenville Road, Suite 310 Lisle, Illinois 60532 Attn: Kathleen Field Orr To the Developer: Pioneer Development, LLC 30 N. Gould Street, #38989 Sheridan, Wyoming 82801 Attn: Matt McCarron With a copy to: David J. Silverman Mahoney, Silverman & Cross, LLC 822 Infantry Drive, Suite 100 Joliet, Illinois 60435 8 REDLINE (v6) 9.15.25 Section 7. Agreement to Prevail over Ordinances. In the event of any conflict between this Agreement or the PUD Agreement and any ordinances, codes, rules, or regulations of the City, whether existing at the time of execution or adopted or amended during the term of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement and the PUD Agreement shall prevail and govern. Section 8. Provisions. if any provision of this Agreement or its application to any person, entity, or property is held invalid, such provision shall be deemed to be excised here from and the invalidity thereof shall not affect the application or validity of any other terms, conditions, and provisions of this Agreement and, to that end, any terms, conditions, and provisions of this Agreement are declared to be severable. This Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements constitute all of the agreements between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof, and supersede all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, whether written or oral. This Agreement may only be amended by a written instrument executed by both parties. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed or constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing waiver, unless otherwise expressly provided in writing signed by the waiving party. Section 9. Closing Notice. 9 REDLINE M) 9.15.25 The Parties acknowledge that as of the date of approval of this Agreement, Developer is the contract purchaser of the Subject Property. At the time the City Council approves this Agreement, the Annexation Ordinance and all entitlement approval ordinances approved herewith shall be held by the City until such time as Developer or its assign takes title to the Subject Property as hereafter provided. To this end, this Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements, the Annexation Ordinance and all entitlement ordinances shall become effective as of the date Developer or its assignee takes title to the Subject Property (the "Effective Date"). This Agreement, the Annexation Ordinance and all entitlement ordinances shall not be filed or recorded unless Developer or its assignee takes title to the Subject Property. The City Clerk shall cause the Agreement to be recorded against the Subject Property only after receipt of notice ("Closing Notice") that the Developer has acquired the Subject Property. If the City Clerk does not receive a Closing Notice by July 1, 2026, then this Agreement shall be null and void, and the City Clerk shall not thereafter record the Agreement. Section 10. Assignment A. Pre -Closing Assignment: Prior to City's receipt of Closing Notice pursuant to Section 9, Developer may assign this Agreement with written approval of the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The Developer may assign this Agreement without the approval of the City to its lenders or its affiliates or successors so long as the Developer owns and controls no less than fifty-one percent (51 %) of such affiliates or successors and retains said ownership interest until the date Closing Notice is provided to the City. B. Post -Closing Assignment. The Developer may assign, sell or lease all or a 10 REDLINE (v6) 9.15.25 portion of the Subject Property but only after the City has received the Closing Notice and the execution and delivery of the Ancillary Agreement by the parties and the recordation of the Covenants and Restrictions as defined in Section 12. The Developer shall provide the City with at least thirty (30) days' prior notice of any intended assignment of this Agreement. Section 11. Dormant Special Service Area. Per the requirements of the City's UDO, the City shall create a dormant special service area the "SSA") for the purpose of maintaining common areas should Developer or any successor in interest or assignee fail to do so. The SSA shall not be implemented and SSA taxes shall not be levied upon the Subject Property unless the property owner of record is notified of the need to implement the SSA. Section 12. Covenants and Restrictions. Within thirty (30) days of the approval of this Agreement, Developer shall submit to the City a comprehensive list of all of the obligations of he Developer regarding the construction, operation and use of the Subject Property as set forth in the Ancillary Agreements for administrative approval by City staff (the "Covenants and Restrictions"). Upon approval by the City, Developer shall record the Covenants and Restrictions against the Subject Property upon receipt of the Closing Notice. The Covenants and Restrictions, which shall run with the land and shall provide that the City shall have a non-exclusive right to enforce any violation of the Covenants and Restrictions. 11 REDLINE (v6) 9,15.25 Section 13. Business Association. _. Developer may incorporate a Business Association for the purpose of enforcing the requirements of this Annexation Agreement, the PUD Agreement, the Ancillary Agreements and the Covenants and Restrictions against any successors in interest, assignees or lessees of the Developer. In the event Developer incorporates a Business Association with a right or obligation to enforce the Covenants and Restrictions on the Subject Property, the City shall notify the Business Association of any violation the City believes exists before taking action to enforce the Covenants and Restrictions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Annexation Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the above date at Yorkville, Illinois. United City of Yorkville, an Illinois Attest: ty Clerk PIONEER DEVELOPMENT, LLC 12 REDLINE (v6) 9.15.25 Section 13. Business Association. Developer may incorporate a Business Association for the purpose of enforcing the requirements of this Annexation Agreement, the PUD Agreement,the Ancillary Agreements and the Covenants and Restrictions against any successors in interest, assignees or lessees of the Developer. In the event Developer incorporates a Business Association with a right or obligation to enforce the Covenants and Restrictions on the Subject Property, the City shall notify the Business Association of any violation the City believes exists before taking action to enforce the Covenants and Restrictions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this Annexation Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the above date at Yorkville, Illinois. United City of Yorkville,an Illinois municipal corporation By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk PIONEER DEVELOPMENT,LLC By: 4 12 177-0-1g-S- REDLINE(v6)9.15.25 Exhibit A Galena & 47TH LLC, MPLIV 10 LLC Sanjay & Sameer Gupta The Konicek Family Limited Partnership DALE L. KONICEK, LLC OWNER: Suniay & Sameer Gupta PINS BY OWNER PIN:02-05-300-003 PIN: 02-04-300-032 PIN:02- 04-300-024 PIN:02-05-400-021 PIN:02-09-100- 031 PIN:02-09-100-030 CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-100- 015 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN:02-05-200-007 UNINCORPORATED PIN:02-06-100-022 UNINCORPORATED PIN:02-06-200-002 PIN:02-05-400-022 PIN:02-05-200- 006 PIN: 02- 04-100-016 PIN: 02-06-400-008 PIN:02-06-200-003 PIN:02-05-100-003 PIN:02-05-100-005 PIN: 02-05-400-009 PIN: 02-04-300-018 PIN: 02-04-300-017 PIN:02-06-400-001 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY OF YORKVILLE UNINCORPORATED UNINCORPORATED UNINCORPORATED UNINCORPORATED CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY OF YORKVILLE UNINCORPORATED PARCELI: THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 5 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE WEST 40 CHAINS (RECORD), 2652.01 FEET ( MEASURED) TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH 38 1I2 LINKS ( RECORD), 24.51 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTH BANK OF A DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES EAST (RECORD), NORTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST (MEASURED), 2593.76 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST, 232.55 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON - TANGENT CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 68.93 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 59 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 68.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 265.04 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST, 57.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 4 DESCRIBED -AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH ON THE SECTION LINE 26.80 CHAINS; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, 14.30 CHAINS; THENCE IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, 20.67 CHAINS EAST OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SECTION LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF LOT 2 LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE; BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 265.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENT CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 531.35 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 27 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 509.62 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST 150.53 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 1 I SECONDS EAST, PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 912.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SAID POINT BEING 364.44 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4 (AS MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH LINE) AND SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF TERMINUS; IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. OWNER: Galena & 47th LLC and MPLIVIOLLC PARCELI: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 19 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 990.0 FEET (15 CH.) TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE SOUTH O1 DEGREE 19 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 1.84 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 152 AT PAGE 392; THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 56 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 1722.34 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT 907257 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 128.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 19 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 10.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 787.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, BEING A CIRCULAR CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1596.42 FEET CONCAVE TO THE WEST, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 13 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST, 773.94 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, SAID POINT BEARING NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, 71999 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, BEING A CIRCULAR CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1596.42 FEET CONCAVE TO THE WEST, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST, 205.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 45 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 88.42 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE CHICAGO-GALENA ROAD; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST, 41.71 FEET TO AN EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 152 AT PAGE 392; THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 39 2 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 267.87 FEET TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 9.74 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE NORTH 27 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 366.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 756.55 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING FROM SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 02 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, 581.48 FEET TO A POINT OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, 22.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 AND THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON ROD MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREE 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1,550.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST 409.15 FEET PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 221.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST 115.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST 196.55 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 1,336.52 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST 600.81 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF GALENA ROAD AS NOW ESTABLISHED; THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 677.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 348.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST 599.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST 750.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 3: THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER 642.93 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 162.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 102 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WITH THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, MEASURED CLOCKWISE THEREFROM, 100.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 169.50 FEET, AS MEASURED PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE SOUTHERLY OF SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE, 14.66 FEET TO THE PRESENT CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD AS DEPICTED ON A PLAT RECORDED JUKE 5, 1964 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 145193; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PRESENT CENTER LINE, 1675.69 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PRESENT CENTER LINE BEING ALONG A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 42,975.00 FEET, 933.19 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG SAID PRESENT CENTER LINE, 64.12 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 95T 16 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5,920.88 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 2,316.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE EASTERLY, 2,651. 03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF WHICH IS 2,326.70 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF, 2,68696 FEET TO SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE, 101.94 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. OWNER: Dale L. Konicek, LLC TRACT 1: THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 5 AND THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 4, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON PIPE MONUMENT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREE 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1730.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 362.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST 2025.23 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT 73-2720; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 1,222.89 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 577.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 49 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 298.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST 15.64 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257; (THE NEXT 5 CALLS ARE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257) THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 170.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 1,000.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 36.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 925.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 2: THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST, LYING NORTHERLY OF A LINE EXTENDING EASTERLY FROM A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 2316 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION, 2326.7 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY LINE PURSUANT TO DOCUMENT 73-2720, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ALSO; THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTH ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 2460.05 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE MOST SOUTHERLY LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED JULY 15, 1966 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 35339, BY A DEED DATED JANUARY 31, 1972 AND RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1972 AS DOCUMENT 72-467 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PROPERTY CONVEYED TO LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST 4 NUMBER 35339, WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 27 SECONDS TO THE LEFT WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 812.66 FEET, THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 49 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 366.94 FEET, THENCE EASTERLY 88 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 04 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 809.73 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 378.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ALSO; THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTH ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 2474.60 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED, THENCE WESTERLY ON A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 19 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 812.66 FEET, THENCE NORTH ALONG A LINE 89 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 03 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1.61 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE MOST SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED JULY 15, 1966 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 35339 BY DEED DATED JANUARY 31, 1972 AND RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1972 AS DOCUMENT 72-467, THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, A DISTANCE OF 812.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID EAST LINE, 13.55 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 3: LOT 2 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 5 (EXCEPT THAT PART DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE WEST 40 CHAINS TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT, THENCE NORTH 38 1/2 LINKS TO THE SOUTH BANK OF DITCH, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 40 CHAINS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 114, 1961.60 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 667.0 FEET, THENCE SOUTH AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID NORTH LINE, 396.0 FEET, THENCE WEST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 667.0 FEET, THENCE NORTH AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 396.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 5 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE WEST 40 CHAINS (RECORD), 2652.01 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE NORTH 38 1/2 LINKS (RECORD), 25.41 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTH BANK OF A DITCH, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST (RECORD), NORTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST (MEASURED), 2593,76 FEET MEASURED) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST, 232.55 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENT CURVE, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 68.93 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 5 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 59 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 68.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 265.04 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST, 57.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING) IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 4: THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 4, LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 265.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENT CURVE, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 531. 35 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 27 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 509.62 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST 150.53 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST, PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 110.00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 912.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SAID POINT BEING 364.44 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4 AS MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH LINE) AND SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF TERMINUS, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 5: PARCELI: THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 4, PART OF SECTION 5, PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/ 4 OF SECTION 8 AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD AS NOW ESTABLISHED ACROSS SAID SECTION 5 WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 2673.13 FEET TO A POINT 2327.34 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST I14 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST 1323.10 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 2325. 56 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1319.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 1828.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES EAST 3596.80 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 781.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 300. 01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 40 MINUTES EAST 291.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST 240.28 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 01 SECONDS EAST 1428.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 991.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST 1745.17 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 1373.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 600.81 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID GALENA ROAD; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 44 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, 3318.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN LYING SOUTH OF A LINE EXTENDING EASTERLY FROM A POINT ON SAID WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 WHICH POINT IS 1876.07 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5 TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 5 WHICH POINT IS 1828.85 FEET SOUTH OF SAID NORTH QUARTER CORNER, AND EXCEPT A STRIP OF LAND 205.00 FEET WIDE IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 AND THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1828.85 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 10, 1967, KNOWN AS TRUST NO. 35913 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 154368 IN BOOK 152, PAGE 392 AS SAID NORTH LINE IS MONUMENTND AND OCCUPIED, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS LINE "B", FOR THE POINT OR BEGINNING; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID LINE "B", A DISTANCE OF 3596.80 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF ROB ROY DITCH FORMING AN ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 57 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 205.00 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 205.00 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANT SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE AFORESAID LINE "B"; THENCE WEST ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 3598.47 FEET TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE 205.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND ALSO EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID SECTION 4 LYING EAST OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. AND ALSO EXCEPTING: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 AND THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON ROD MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE 1,550.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST 409.15 FEET PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 221.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST 115.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST 196.55 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 1336. 52 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST 600.81 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF GALENA ROAD AS NOW ESTABLISHED; THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 677.76 FEET, THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 348.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16 DEGREES I l MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST 599.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST 750.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AND ALSO EXCEPTING, THAT PART CONVEYED BY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 30, 2007 AS DOCUMENT 200700026496, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 5 AND THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 4, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON PIPE MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST U4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1730.13 FEET TO -THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 362.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST 2026.23 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT 73-2720; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 1,222.89 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 577.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 298.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST 15.64 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257; (THE NEXT 5 CALLS ARE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257) THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 170.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST, 1,000.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 38.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 925.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 AND NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SECTION LINE 1331.4 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 00 SECONDS MEASURED FROM WEST TO SOUTH FROM THE SECTION LINE, 2321.5 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, MEASURED FROM NORTH TO WEST FROM THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 1328.7 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE SECTION LINE, FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 00 SECONDS MEASURED FROM EAST TO SOUTH FROM THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 146.4 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, MEASURED FROM NORTH TO WEST FROM THE SECTION LINE, 1553 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, MEASURED FROM EAST TO NORTH FROM THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 2461.1 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 6; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1534 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, LYING SOUTH AND WEST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT 1876.07 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY BY DOCUMENT NO. R73-2841 TRACT 1); THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1133.17 TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 415.0 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANT EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO EARL P. AND EMMA V. KONICEK BY DEED RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 136414 IN BOOK 126, PAGE 41; THENCE NORTH ON SAID PARALLEL LINE, ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO SAID COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY BY DOCUMENT NO. R73-2841, 1897.19 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6 AND THE POINT OF TERMINATION; AND ALSO EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE EXTENDED EASTERLY FROM A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 5 WHICH POINT IS 1876.07 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5 TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SECTION 5, WHICH POINT IS 1828,85 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5, ALL IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 6: PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 6; TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 3407,85 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO SUSAN SCHMIDT BY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 1929 IN BOOK 80, PAGES 334 AND 335; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO SUSAN SCHMIDT A DISTANCE OF 1552.74 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO EARL P KONICEK AND WIFE BY WARRANTY DEED DATED DECEMBER 4, 1961 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 136414, THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO EARL P. KONICEK AND WIFE 1240.82 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD, FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH ALONG THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE 919.13 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT WHICH IS 1312.43 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANCE NORTH OF SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 26 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 35 SECOND TO THE RIGHT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 332.08 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF PARCEL TWO OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 45553 BY CONSERVATORS DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1973 AS DOCUMENT 73-467I; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 62 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 01 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE 646.8 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF BEEC14ER ROAD; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 1362.40 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 460.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ALSO, THAT PART OF THE EAST 112 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 70 DEGREES 55 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 276 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 8, 200 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 55 MINUTES EAST 270 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1456.6 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 470.51 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL TWO OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 45553 BY CONSERVATORS DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1973 AS DOCUMENT R73-4671; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 1006.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL TWO 388.83 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID NORTH LINE WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN PARCEL ONE OF SAID DOCUMENT 73-4671; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL ONE A DISTANCE OF 115.02 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL ONE WHICH IS 1112.06 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANCE NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE 26 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 38 SECOND TO THE LEFT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 2329.35 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO DIANE R. KAPCHINSKI BY TRUSTEES DEED RECORDED JUNE 14, 1973 AS DOCUMENT 73-28243; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO DIANE R. KAPCHINSKI 812.68 FEET TO THE EAST LIEN OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, 1319.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, EXCEPT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION INCLUDED IN THE WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 24, 2020 AS DOCUMENT 202000016040. OWNER: The Konicek Family Limited Partnership A PART OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND PART OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE EAST 19.508 CHAINS (1,287.528 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE FOR PLACE OF BEGINNING, THENCE EAST ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, 44.599 CHAINS (2,943.534 FEET), THENCE SOUTH 16 MINUTES WEST 56.242 CHAINS (3,711.972 FEET) TO THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 58 MINUTES WEST 3.473 CHAINS (229.218 FEET) ALONG THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 37 MINUTES WEST 52.777 CHAINS (3,483.282 FEET) ALONG THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 16 MINUTES WEST 8.03 CHAINS (529.98 FEET) ALONG THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 05 MINUTES EAST 10.258 CHAINS (677.028 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 01 MINUTE WEST 6.632 CHAINS (437.712 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 27 DEGREES 51 MINUTES EAST 11.60 CHAINS (765.6 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES EAST 11.535 CHAINS (761.31 FEET) TO THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 12 DEGREES 40 MINUTES EAST TO THE PLACE OF THE BEGINNING, SITUATED IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, EXCEPTING THEREFROM RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED FOR ASHE ROAD AND GALENA ROAD AND ALSO; EXCEPTING, THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 19.508 CHAINS (1287.53 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 40 MINUTES WEST, 22.655 CHAINS (1495.23 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES WEST, 11.535 CHAINS (761.31 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST, 765.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 DEGREES 01 MINUTES EAST, 437.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 05 MINUTES WEST, 637.63 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GALENA ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 77 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GALENA ROAD, 187.93 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 77 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE 136.30 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING EASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF I4,285.00 FEET AND CHORD BEARING SOUTH 78 DEGREES 06 MINUTES I 1 SECONDS EAST, 189.98 FEET TO A POINT OF BEND IN SAID RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 14 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 51 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, 20.02 FEET TO A POINT OF BEND; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 14,265.00 FEET AND CHORD BEARING SOUTH 79 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 453.85 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENT; THENCE SOUTH 80 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 38 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, 29.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST, 528.48 19 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST, 810.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, 541.53 FEET TITHE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ALSO EXCEPTING, THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING DESCRIBED BY COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 19.508 CHAINS (1287.53 FEET) TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EQUESTRIAN ESTATES AT LEGACY FARMS; THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 40 MINUTES WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND SAID EAST LINE EXTENDED SOUTHERLY, 22.655 CHAINS (1495.23 FEET); THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES EAST, 29.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ASHE ROAD AS RELOCATED FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 618.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 35 MINUTES EAST, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 355.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES EAST, A DISTANCE OF 683.60 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ASHE ROAD; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1482.39 FEET, WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 10 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, 360.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 11 Planned Unit Development Agreement By and Between The United City of Yorkville and Pioneer Development, LLC Project Cardinal) This Planned Unit Development Agreement by and between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois and Pioneer Development, LLC, a limited liability company of the State of Illinois is entered into this _Qft xlay of p} , 2025. Article 1, Preambles 1. 1 The United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the "City ") is a duly organized and validly existing non -home rule municipality pursuant to the 1970 Constitution of the State of Illinois and the laws of the State. 1.2 The Project. Pioneer Development, LLC, a limited liability company of the State of IIlinois the "Developer") is the contract purchaser of a combined 1,037 acres located west of North Bridge Street (Illinois State Route 47), east of Ashe Road, and directly south of East Baseline Road, identified as parcel numbers 02-05-300-003, 02-04-300-032, 02-04-300-024, 02-05-400- 021, 02- 09-100-031, 02-09-100-030, 02-04-100-015, 02-05-200-007, 02-06-100-022, 02-06-200- 002, 02-05-400-022, 02-05-200- 006, 02-04-100-016, 02-06-400-008, 02-06-200-003, 02-05-100- 003, 02-05-100-005, 02-05-400-009, 02-04-300-018, 02-04-300-017, 02-06-400-001, 02-05-200- 004, 02-05-200-001 (collectively the "Subject Property") upon which the Developer intends to develop a secured data center campus (the "Project"). The Project is generally depicted on the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Site Plan") and consists of fourteen buildings, two onsite electrical substation, a utility switchyard, and associated stormwater basins, to be constructed in phases over a period of approximately ten (10) years. 1.3 Zoning. The Subject Property shall be zoned M-2 General Manufacturing District upon annexation of the Subject Property to the City as provided in the Annexation Agreement. A data center and electrical substations are permitted "Energy industrial Uses" in the M-2 District. 1.4 The Planned Unit Development. Under the City's Unified Development Ordinance UDO "), any development encompassing four (4) or more acres shall be approved as a planned unit development. The Developer has submitted an application for a special use planned unit development for the Project (the "Application"). The Application includes thirteen (13) proposed variations which may be allowed under the UDO if (1) such deviations are compatible with surrounding development, and (ii) such deviations are justified through the provision of tangible benefits to the City. The City has reviewed the Application and found it to be complete and consistent with the purpose and intent of the planned unit development regulations. The Project requires the extension of a watermain and sanitary sewer service to the Subject Property thereby benefiting future development within the City as to be more specifically set forth in a Utility & Infrastructure Agreement (the "Utility Agreement") to be executed by the parties no later than July 1, 2026, and the Project is compatible with the surrounding agricultural and industrial uses. 1.5 Entitlements Defined. For purposes of this Agreement, "Entitlements" means all zoning rights, special use approvals, waivers, deviations, standards, and development permissions granted under this Agreement for the Subject Property. Article 2. Development Standards 2.1 PUD Approval. The City has reviewed the Developer's Application and found it to be complete. The Project is consistent with the purpose and intent of the planned unit development regulations; facilitating a unified development that is consistent with the City's plans and policies for industrial development around the Eldamain Road corridor. The Project includes the construction of regional utility improvements that provide tangible benefits to the City, along with the construction of roadways adjacent to the Subject Property pursuant to the Utility Agreement, consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, thereby providing necessary justification for the modifications to standards as required under the UDO. The Project meets the standards for the approval of a special use, the additional standards of review for a planned unit development, and the standards for approval of variations under the planned unit development. The City hereby approves a special use for a planned unit development with specified variations for the Subject Property as generally depicted on the Site Plan, subject to the terms more specifically herein set forth and the terms of a Development Agreement between the City and the Developer as provided in Section 4.2 hereof. The final PUD and PUD Agreement, and all ancillary and related agreements and ordinances shall expire if construction of the Project is not begun within three (3) years of the Effective Date of this PUD Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, the three (3) year period for commencement of the Project set forth in this Section shall be automatically extended for the duration of any force majeure event, as defined in Section 7.7, that delays commencement. Commencement of the Project is understood to mean the issuance of a building permit for the construction of structures, as depicted on a final site plan, on the Subject Property, provided said building permit is not revoked or invalidated due to the Developer's failure to begin constructing structures within the twelve (12) month time period established under Section 8-1-3 of the City's Code of Ordinances. Upon commencement of the Project within three (3) years of the Effective Date of this PUD Agreement, all Entitlements in this PUD are fully vested and protected from amendments and changes to City ordinances, codes, or regulations for a period of twenty (20) years from the Effective Date. Upon expiration of this vesting period, all such Entitlements shall remain in full force and effect, continuing indefinitely, subject only to amendment or revocation as expressly provided in Article 5 of this Agreement. No loss of rights, sunset, or reversion shall occur due to inactivity, delayed build -out, or passage of time provided that the Project has commenced within that twenty (20) year period. These Entitlements explicitly run with the land and bind all successors and assigns so long as the construction of the Project has commenced. For the avoidance of doubt, upon commencement of the Project these vested rights explicitly protect the Subject Property from any future changes in zoning ordinances, special use requirements, permitted uses, or other city regulations or standards enacted subsequent to this Agreement. 2.2 Energy Industrial Uses. A data center is classified as an "Energy Industrial Use" pursuant to Table 10-3-12(B) of the UDO. Section 10-4-10 of the UDO is reserved for additional regulations applicable to Energy Industrial Uses. No new or amended standards, code provisions, or special regulations for Energy Industrial Uses shall apply to the Subject Property during the 2 twenty (20) year vested term from the Effective Date of this Agreement, unless Developer agrees in writing or to the extent required by state or federal law. The Developer is strictly prohibited from generating or storing nuclear energy within the City. Nothing in this provision shall prohibit the Developer from purchasing or using electricity generated at a facility located outside the City. 2.3 Terms for Construction. The Developer has advised the City of its intent to construct the Project over a period of approximately ten (10) years and has submitted a preliminary phasing plan to the City, attached hereto as Exhibit B (the "Phasing Plan"). The City hereby approves the Phasing Plan. Developer's reimbursement of the City's costs for design engineering and construction associated with the public utility improvements necessary to facilitate the Development of the Subject Property shall be as provided in the Utility Agreement and the Development Agreement referenced in Section 4.2. The Phasing Plan's estimated ten (10)-year build -out schedule is advisory only and non -binding. Developer may accelerate or delay phases without penalty, amendment to this Agreement, or additional City approval. Subject to City Council Approval, the Phasing Plan may be modified or reordered only as required due to a change in Commonwealth Edison's power allocation, or other events out of Developer's control, rendering the initially approved Phasing Plan impossible. Said City Council approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Developer may accelerate or slow phases at its sole discretion, without penalty or loss of any rights. There shall be no deadlines, penalties, loss of rights, or other consequences if the actual schedule or order of phases differs from these estimates. 2.4 Building Setbacks. The Developer has requested and the City hereby approves modification of required building setbacks as established by the UDO for the Subject Property. Setbacks shall apply only to the perimeter of the Subject Property with Galena Road being deemed the "front yard", Bridge Street and Ashe Road being deemed the "side yard", Baseline Road being deemed the "rear yard". The front yard setback shall be twenty-five (25) feet from the existing Galena Road right-of-way. The rear yard setback shall be twenty-five (25) feet from the Baseline Road right-of-way. The side yard setback, measured to the Bridge Street and Ashe Road rights - of -way, respectively, shall be twenty (20) feet. In anticipation of possible resubdivision of the Subject Property into individual lots, the City agrees to a zero (0) lot line for all structures to be platted within the interior of the Subject Property. Moreover, the City hereby agrees that lots within the PUD shall not be required to abut a public street. The building setbacks established in this paragraph shall apply exclusively to buildings. Fences, signage, drive aisles, parking spaces, and other improvements to the Subject Property are expressly permitted within the defined setbacks. All data center buildings shall be at least five hundred feet (500') from the nearest residential or commercial structure outside the boundaries of the Subject Property. The five hundred (500) foot building separation required by this section shall be measured from existing, occupied, residential or commercial buildings as of the date of PUD approval. The building separation requirement does not apply to future construction, unoccupied structures, sheds, barns, or temporary buildings. No 11 new building separation obligations will be imposed due to construction, conversion, or change of use of adjacent properties after the PUD approval date. 2.5 Parking Requirements. Pursuant to the City's UDO, 0. 3 parking spaces are required per 1000 square feet net floor space for industrial developments. Developer estimates the average building size on the Subject Property will be approximately 1,878,142 square feet, requiring approximately 505 parking spaces per building. The City hereby grants Developer's request to set the minimum required parking at 0.2 parking spaces for 1000 square feet (which formula shall equate to approximately 375 parking spaces per building under the Developer's current site plan). Each building shall require no more than 0.2 parking spaces per 1000 square feet of net floor space. Section 10-5-IK-1 of the UDO requires Developer to install a minimum of 104 electric vehicle charging stations ("EV Stations"). Developer requests a waiver from the requirements of the UDO that Developer install at least 104 EV Stations. The City agrees to waive the minimum EV Station requirement, provided the Developer pay a fee -in -lieu for each EV Station that developer chooses not to build. Any fee -in -lieu for EV charging stations shall be set at a fixed amount per station in a separately executed agreement, and shall not exceed a maximum total cap agreed by Developer and City prior to issuance of the building permit. The City shall have no authority to increase parking or EV charging requirements on the Project, as depicted in the approved Site Plan. in the future. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City shall have the right to increase parking or EV charging requirements in the event Developer alters or expands the Project. All reviews for parking and EV charging plans that conform to these requirements shall be administrative only, not subject to council or commission review. 2. 6 Access to the Subject Propgrty. The City hereby agrees to the Developer's proposal for the construction of certain points of access to the Subject Property, as generally depicted on the Site Plan, subject to comments in a review letter by City Engineer, Engineering Enterprises, Inc., dated 2025. The Project shall be developed with private roads or private drive aisles which may be secured to restrict access into/through the Subject Property. The City hereby waives requirements for vehicular cross access in light of the private roads and secured nature of the campus as depicted on the Site Plan. Where access is gated or otherwise restricted, Developer shall work with emergency service providers to ensure access via a knox box or such other means as may be agreed upon between the parties. The number and location of access points to the Subject Property may be adjusted by Developer, subject to City approval and approval of the authority having jurisdiction over the roadway and consistent with applicable engineering standards and public safety requirements. Security gatehouses, guard booths, and surveillance infrastructure shall be expressly permitted at access points, including within setback areas, for campus security purposes. 2. 7 Pedestrian Circulation. The City's UDO requires connections between off-street parking, on -site pedestrian circulation systems, and existing and future planned trails. The Project shall incorporate walkways between parking areas and building entrances within the Subject Property. The City hereby waives any requirement with respect to public access or external pedestrian connections in light of the private roads and secured nature of the campus as 2 depicted on the Site Plan. The City requests, and Developer agrees to design, construct and provide the City at the Developer's election, with either (i) an exclusive easement for, or (ii) a dedication of a ten foot (10') wide shared use path on the outer perimeter of the Subject Property, along Ashe Road between Galena Road and Baseline Road, along Baseline Road from Ashe Road to Bridge Street, along Bridge Street between Baseline Road and Galena Road, and along Galena Road from Ashe Road to Bridge Street, as illustrated on the Proposed Path Locations map, attached hereto as Exhibit C. Developer's obligation under this section is limited to designing and constructing the shared use path, and granting the City an exclusive easement or dedication for the shared -use path. The City shall be responsible for all maintenance of the shared use path once it has been dedicated or an exclusive easement is granted to the City. Developer shall be responsible for all mowing, landscaping and maintenance of all property surrounding the shared use path. The timeline for construction of the shared use path and Developer's obligation to dedicate or grant easement for any shared use path is subject to and shall be governed exclusively by the Utility Agreement. The City agrees that, in the event Developer opts not to dedicate the property but instead to provide City an exclusive easement to the path, City shall indemnify Developer for any injuries occurring on the path itself that are not otherwise the fault of Developer. 2.8 Off Street Loading. No more than one (1) loading space shall be required per building. 2.9 Traffic Management. Developer shall provide the City with a traffic management plan, including a communication strategy and on -site point of contact, for controlling traffic during all phases of construction. Developer has also provided the City with a traffic study dated and incorporated herein by reference. Any construction traffic along roads controlled by Kendall County or the State of IIlinois shall require the cooperation of the relevant authority having jurisdiction over the road. Roadway Improvements shall be addressed in the Utility Agreement. 2.10 Landscaping. The City's UDO establishes standards for landscape improvements for the Project. In light of the secured nature of the campus, the Parties have agreed to emphasize external Transition Zone plantings in lieu of other planting requirements internal to the Subject Property. Developer shall comply with Section 10-5- 3-C, Building Foundation Landscape Zone, and Section 10-5-3-D Parking Area Perimeter Landscape Zone requirements. Along Bridge, Ashe, Baseline and Galena roadway frontages, the Developer shall install a 100' wide Transition Zone Type D landscape buffer, including a 12 foot tall berm where facing residential properties, and an 8-foot- tall berm along all other boundaries not facing residential properties, as generally depicted on the Landscape Plan attached hereto as Exhibit D (the "Landscape Plan"). The City hereby waives all other landscape requirements under Section 10-5-3 of the Code. Berms and transition zone landscaping required by this section shall only be provided at the locations expressly shown on the approved plan. No additional berms or landscape requirements shall be imposed unless Developer agrees in writing. Developer may add berms or increase berm size at its sole discretion. 2.11 Mechanical Screening and Fencing, The City and its sound consultants have agreed that from a noise minimization perspective that the most appropriate location for Mechanical Equipment is on the rooftops; therefore, whenever practical, mechanical equipment shall be placed on the rooftops. If mechanical equipment is to be placed at ground level, it shall be located on the side of the building farthest from any residential structures. All major mechanical equipment shall be fully enclosed or screened by solid barriers. Any mechanical equipment to be installed on a rooftop shall be enclosed by sound -dampening materials. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties acknowledge and agree that the Project and each parcel/lot therein are subject to the requirements of the City's Noise Ordinance, Title 4, Chapter 4 of the City Code as it existed when the PUD application was approved by the City Council. As a condition to the issuance of a Building Permit for each building, the Developer shall submit to the City a detailed site plan illustrating the placement of all mechanical equipment which shall be reviewed by a third -party sound engineer hired by the City who shall make a report to the City Council as provided in 3.4. Minor modifications to approved mechanical equipment placement that do not increase projected noise levels beyond ordinance limits shall be approved by the Community Development Director without further city council review. Minor modifications shall mean any modification in the placement of mechanical equipment that keeps the equipment in the same general location as originally approved. Any modifications of the mechanical equipment that would move equipment (substantial modifications) shall require the approval of City Council. Developer is permitted to install a ten foot (10') tall powder coated black steel security fence around the Subject Property, including typical security features such as controlled entry gates and anti -climb measures permitted by applicable laws. While chain -link and barbed wire fencing is strictly prohibited along the perimeter of the Subject Property, chain -link and barbed wire fencing within the interior of the Subject Property shall be permitted. 2.12 Lots; Street Design. The City hereby waives the requirement in Section 10-7-2 of the UDO that all lots shall front or abut on a public street. The City also waives the street design standards set forth in Section 10-7-3 of the UDO. Said waivers are granted in consideration of the security contemplated for the Project and the restricted nature of access internal to the Subject Property. Due to the restricted nature of access to the Project, the City reserves the right to issue a single site address for the Subject Property off Galena Road. The waivers of public street frontage and street design standards granted in this section are permanent and shall apply to all future plats, subdivisions, phases, and development on the Subject Property. These waivers may not be revoked or modified without the Developer's written consent, and shall run with the land for the benefit of all successors and assigns. 2.13 Appearance Standards. The Project is located adjacent to a main arterial thoroughfare at the City's northern boundary. Therefore, the Project serves as the first development members of the public see as they enter the City when driving south down Bridge Street. Given the location of the Project, Developer shall follow the requirements of Section 10-5-8-c-4b.(2) of the UDO requiring recesses, projections, windows, and other ornamental/architectural features. The Developer has submitted prototype building elevations for the Project, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit E (the "Building Elevations"). The Building Elevations are representative of architectural design and building materials to be utilized for the Project but are not intended to be an exact depiction of any building that may be constructed as part of the Project. The Developer shall provide updated elevations with any application for final plat or at such time as Developer submits for a Building Permit, as may be applicable. The City shall approve updated elevations which are consistent with the quality and character of the Building Elevations. Any updated building elevations that are consistent in quality, character, and height with Exhibit E shall be approved administratively, with no further council or commission review required, even if building height is reduced. 2.14 Building Height. The maximum building height for the Project is seventy-eight (78) feet, inclusive of any rooftop mechanical equipment or appurtenances, which shall be placed to appropriately mitigate noise, In the event that mechanicals are placed on the ground, the maximum building height for the Project shall be fifty-six and a half (56.5) feet to the top of the building structure and no equipment or appurtenances shall be placed on the rooftop of any building at the Subject Property. 2.15 Signa4e. Developer may install wall and monument signs as permitted under Section 10- 6 of the UDO. 2.16 Lighting The Developer agrees to submit to the City for its approval a photometric plan along with manufacturer's cut sheets of the proposed lighting standards to be installed within the parking area of the Subject Property. The photometric plan shall be provided with any application for final plat or at such time as Developer submits for a Building Permit, as may be applicable. The Project shall be required to comply with applicable outdoor lighting standards pursuant to Section 10-5-7 of the UDO. Developer's obligation under this section is satisfied by submitting a preliminary photometric plan for one building at PUD approval. Full, detailed photometric plans shall be provided only with permit applications for each building or phase. All reviews and approvals of conforming photometric plans shall be subject to the City's building permit approval process. 2.17 Battery Storage. a) Unless otherwise approved by the City Council , the Developer covenants that all primary power used for the data center campus on the Subject Property will be delivered from the Commonwealth Edison power grid. Notwithstanding anything herein, standard uninterruptible power supply (UPS) battery systems, lithium -ion or other backup battery systems located within data halls or serving server racks, switchgear, or critical infrastructure shall be permitted at all times. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the installation or use of batteries or battery systems in connection with data center operations. b) Battery uses and storage systems, other than UPS battery systems, lithium -ion or other backup battery systems located within data halls or serving server racks, switchgear, or critical infrastructure, shall be in a separate standalone building a minimum of 50 feet away from any adjacent structure and must be readily accessible by the Bristol -Kendall Fire Protection District for firefighting efforts. These uses shall also be subject to the following additional safety requirements: Developer shall prepare and maintain a fire safety and evacuation plan that shall be approved by the Bristol -Kendall Fire Protection District and the Yorkville Police Department for occupancies that involve activities for the research and development, testing, manufacturing, handling, or storage of lithium -ion batteries or lithium metal batteries, or the repair or servicing of vehicles powered by lithium — ion batteries or lithium metal batteries. Developer is required to install a fire detection and alarm system for both indoor and outdoor areas where batteries shall be stored. The method of fire detection must either be an air -aspirating system or a radiant- energy sensing system. Developer shall install a sprinkler system for indoor rooms where batteries are stored, and must ensure said rooms are separated from the remainder of the occupancy by two-hour barriers. Any structure where batteries are stored must provide a two-hour fire -resistance -rated enclosure and must have an automatic sprinkler system and detection system. Article 3. Developer Obligations 3.1 Permits. The Developer covenants and agrees to obtain all required permits for the development of the Project and to construct all improvements in accordance with applicable City ordinances and all permits as issued. The Developer further agrees to obtain all approvals and permits from any other governmental units or agencies as may be required in connection with the construction and operation of the Project. 3.2 Engineering and Roadway Reconstruction. All road and infrastructure improvements required in connection with the Subject Property, and any allocation of costs to Developer, shall be addressed exclusively in the Utility Agreement or the Development Agreement, which obligation shall be due or enforceable as if part of this PUD Agreement. Galena Road is under the jurisdiction of Kendall County. Developer shall secure a permit from Kendall County for the construction of necessary road improvements along Galena Road. Said road improvements to be permitted by Kendall County shall be constructed pursuant to the schedule required by Kendall County. The City anticipates that Kendall County will require a traffic impact study to permit access to the Subject Property off Galena Road. 3.3 East Beecher Road Dedication Offset; West Beecher Road Access. Any payment in lieu of extending East Beecher Road shall be set forth in the Utility Agreement or the Development Agreement, which agreements shall contain details of the cost backup, prorated by phase or building permit. Access to a planned private roadway accessible from Galena Road and located south of Galena Road and east of Eldamain Road, along the route of the current West Beecher Road shall be addressed in the Utility Agreement. 3.4 Noise Studies and Noise Monitoring. At the onset of each phase of construction, Developer shall install continuous noise monitoring devices recommended by a sound engineer chosen by the City, at discrete locations chosen by the City's sound engineers. A preliminary noise monitoring report shall be prepared and submitted to the City within sixty (60) days after each building housing data center equipment on Subject Property is operational. The noise monitoring devices shall be maintained throughout the life of the Project, and the City shall have continuous access to the data they produce. If, at any time, noise levels on the Subject Property exceed those permitted by the City's noise ordinance applicable to the Subject Property, the Developer shall investigate the source of the noise and identify and implement one or more means to mitigate the noise that is resulting in the noise ordinance violation. The Developer has submitted an initial noise study attached hereto as Exhibit G ("Initial Noise Study")that included: (i) baseline noise measurements of the current environment and predictive modeling in phased and at full buildout to ensure the facility's design will meet local noise limits as detailed in Title 4, Chapter 4 of Yorkville's Code of Ordinances on the date that the Developer's PUD application was submitted; (ii) and noise source data for the cooling equipment can be based on generic or manufacturer -provided data. The purpose of the initial study was to refine the site layout and cooling scheme as needed to meet the City's noise ordinance. As a condition of the issuance of a Building Permit, the Developer shall submit a Site Plan illustrating the placement of all mechanical equipment as set forth in 2.11. The Developer shall also be required to submit a final noise study that shall include: (i) noise source data for the specific equipment planned for the project based on actual sound level measurements of that specific equipment, made in accordance with nationally recognized standards and not on interpolated, extrapolated, or otherwise calculated sound levels; and (ii) a mitigation plan to ensure that operational noise does not exceed the applicable local noise limits detailed in Yorkville's Code of Ordinances, which includes the penalty for tonal equipment. This final noise study shall be subject to the review of the City's sound engineer. The City Council shall approve the Site Plan and the Building Permit if in the reasonable opinion of the City's Sound Engineer the Noise Ordinance will be met. 3.5 _Water Usage. All obligations, certifications, or penalties relating to Developer's water usage shall be addressed exclusively in the Utility Agreement between Developer and the City. 3.6 Dedications. All right-of-way and easement dedications shall be governed exclusively by the Utility Agreement or Development Agreement and shall be enforceable under this PUD Agreement. 3.7 Maintain Improvements in Good and Clean Condition. The Developer shall maintain the Subject Property in reasonably good and clean condition at all times during the development by the Developer, which shall include promptly removing all mud, dirt, and debris that is deposited on any street, sidewalk, or other public property in or adjacent to the Subject Property by the Developer or any agent of or contractor hired by, or on behalf of the Developer and repair any damage to any public property that may be caused by the activities of Developer or any agent of or contractor hired by, or on behalf of, the Developer. 3.8 No Liability -for City Review. Developer acknowledges and agrees that (i) the City is not, and shall not be, in any way liable for any damages or injuries that may be sustained as the result of the City's review and approval of any plans or improvements or as a result of the issuance of any approvals, permits, certificates, or acceptances for the development of the Project or use of any portion of the Subject Property or the improvements and (ii) the City's review and approval of any plans and the issuance of any approvals, permits, certificates, or acceptances does not, and shall not, in any way be deemed to insure Developer, or any of its successors, assigns, tenants, or licensees, or any third party, against violations or damage or injury of any kind at any time. 3.9 Cooperation with other Units of Local Government. The proposed Project affects various jurisdictions outside the City of Yorkville, including Kendall County and the Yorkville -Bristol Sanitary District. Developer understands that successful completion of the Project will require the cooperation of other Units of Local Government and could have a detrimental impact on these other units of local government. To that effect, Developer shall enter into a separate Agreement with the Yorkville -Bristol Sanitary District for upgrades to the Sanitary District's wastewater treatment facilities and sanitary sewer infrastructure required as a result of the Project and with Kendall County regarding necessary improvements to Galena Road along the frontage of the Subject Property. 3.10 Emergency Operations Plan. Developer shall prepare a plan for emergency situations, including the Developer's plan and procedures for responding to, managing, and recovering from emergencies and disasters (an "Emergency Operations Plan"), The Emergency Operations Plan shall include the Developer's plans for sharing information, and coordinating emergency responses, with emergency response agencies, including, but not limited to, the Bristol -Kendall Fire Protection District and the Yorkville Police Department. The Emergency Operations Plan shall be submitted to the City prior to initial occupancy of the first building. 3.11 Operational Testing. from time to time, Developer will need to test certain operational components of the Data Center, such as generators. Developer agrees to only conduct such operational testing during the hours of 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and not on any Holidays "Holiday" shall be defined as any date that has been designated a state holiday by the State of Illinois). 3.12 Development Offsets. Any obligation to pay development offsets, impact fees, or similar charges shall be addressed in the Development Agreement which obligations shall be due and enforceable under this PUD Agreement. 3. 13 Hold Harmless and Indemnification. Developer shall hold harmless the City, and all of its elected, appointed officials, and employees (collectively the "City Parties") from any and all third - party claims that may be asserted against the City Parties in connection with (i) the City's review and approval of any plans or improvements, (ii) the City's issuance of any approval, permit or certificate, or (iii) Developer's development, construction, maintenance, or use of the Subject Property. Developer's obligation to indemnify or hold harmless the City Parties shall not apply to claims resulting from the City's own negligence, willful misconduct, or breach of this Agreement, nor to any claim asserted by the City Parties themselves. 3.14 CasuaLty and Rebuilding Rights. If any structure or improvement on the Subject Property is damaged or destroyed by casualty or natural disaster, Developer or subsequent owner has the explicit right to rebuild or repair such structure or improvement to its original permitted size, height, density, and use without requiring further zoning approvals or public hearings. The City shall promptly issue all necessary permits to facilitate rebuilding consistent with originally approved plans, subject only to compliance with applicable building codes. The PUD Entitlements and vested protections shall fully apply to all rebuilt structures. 10 3.15 Covenants and Restrictions. The Developer shall record Covenants and Restrictions as required by Section 12 of the Annexation Agreement (the "Covenants and Restrictions"). 3.16 Dormant Special Service Area. Per the requirements of the City's UDO, the City shall create a dormant special service area (the "SSA") for the purpose of maintaining common areas should Developer or any successor in interest or assignee fail to do so. The SSA shall not be implemented and SSA taxes shall not be levied upon the Subject Property unless the property owner of record is notified of the need to implement the SSA. Article 4. City Obligations 4.1 Challenges. In the event of any challenge to the City's annexation or zoning of the Subject Property, the City agrees that, in cooperation with the Developer, the City shall undertake such process as is necessary and appropriate to correct any deficiency associated with the annexation or zoningof the Subject Property. In such event, the City agrees that the Parties shall not be required to await adjudication of any such challenge, but that the Parties shall proactively undertake any process necessary to reapprove the annexation and zoning on terms consistent with the approvals set forth herein. 4. 2 City Assistance. The City agrees to cooperate and provide any reasonable assistance requested by Developer in applying for and obtaining any and all approvals or permits necessary for the development of the Subject Property provided that the Developer reimburses the City for all costs and expenses incurred in providing such assistance. The City will cooperate with Developer' s specified vendors to assert applicable tax exemptions relating to purchase of materials to be incorporated into the public improvements, consistent with the Illinois Department of Revenue Regulations, the Retailers' Occupation Tax and with all requirements of law (including providing the City's form tax exempt letter as may be required). The City's issuance of any Building Permits shall be contingent upon the Developer entering into the following separate agreements with the City related to the Project and the Subject Property: a Development Agreement, and a Utility & Infrastructure Agreement. Such assistance, including the execution of the separate agreements listed above, shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed by the City, and shall not be conditioned upon Developer entering into any agreement or obligation not expressly required by this PUD Agreement or the Annexation Agreement entered into by the Parties. Such agreements shall be required as a condition to the effectiveness of this PUD Agreement. 4. 3 UDO Freeze. Upon commencement of construction of the Project and for the term of this Agreement, no amendment to the Unified Development Ordinance or any City code, ordinance, or regulation shall apply to the Subject Property if it imposes more stringent or additional requirements, unless Developer agrees in writing or required by state or federal law. All rights and standards granted by this PUD are vested and frozen for the full term. After expiration of this Agreement, the Subject Property shall continue to be governed by the underlying M-2 zoning, together with all Entitlements explicitly granted by this PUD, unless amended pursuant to applicable law with Developer's consent or as otherwise explicitly provided in Article 5. II 4.4 Equal Treatment. The City acknowledges Developer's substantial up -front investment in the Subject Property and agrees that, while generally applicable permit fees and building codes are not frozen, the City shall not impose, adopt, or enforce any new fee, requirement, or regulation after the Effective Date other than those agreed to in a Development Agreement or Utility & Infrastructure Agreement between the Developer and the City. These protections shall apply for the full term of this Agreement, and nothing herein overrides the broader UDO freeze or vesting protections provided in this Agreement. 4.5 Certificate of Occupancy. The City shall issue a certificate of occupancy for each building constructed on the Subject Property when the building is fully capable of being served by sanitary sewers, storm sewers, water main, public/private roads, natural gas (as may be applicable), and permanent electric service, and is otherwise in conformance with City Codes and other applicable state laws, and all applicable fees have been paid. It is understood by the Parties that permanent electric service does not include Combined Cycle Gas Turbines, Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine generators, diesel generators, and nuclear sources. The City agrees to issue temporary or conditional occupancy permits in the event that weather conditions prohibit the installation of certain subdivision improvements such as sidewalks, private drive aisles, and required landscaping. Article 5. Term This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for a period of twenty (20) years from the Effective Date, unless earlier terminated or amended by mutual written agreement of the Parties, or revoked for material breach as provided herein. No sunset or automatic expiration shall occur based on build -out, inactivity, or the passage of time less than twenty (20) years. After expiration of this Agreement, the PUD and all Entitlements granted herein shall remain permanently effective, running with the land, subject only to amendment or revocation pursuant to applicable law, after notice and a public hearing, and then only for cause or with the Developer's written consent. Article 5. Notices All notices and other communications in connection with this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered to the addressee thereof (a) when delivered in person on a business day at the address set forth below, or (b) on the third business day after being deposited in any main or branch United States post office, for delivery by properly addressed, postage prepaid, certified or registered mail, returned receipt requested, at the address set forth below, or (c) by email transmission, when transmitted to email address set forth below, when actually received provided that any email transmission shall be accompanied by a delivery of a written notice via first class mail to the addresses below. Notices and communications to Developer shall be addressed to, and delivered at, the following addresses: With a copy to: 12 Pioneer Development, LLC 30 N. Gould Street, #38989 Sheridan, Wyoming 82801 Attn: Matt McCarron David J. Silverman Mahoney, Silverman & Cross, LLC 822 Infantry Drive, Suite 100 Joliet, Illinois 60435 Notices and communications to the City shall be addressed to and delivered at these addresses: With a copy to: United City of Yorkville Ottosen DiNolfo Hasenbalg & Castaldo, Ltd. 651 Prairie Pointe 4221 Warrenville Rd., Ste. 310 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Lisle, Illinois 60532 Attn: City Administrator Attn: Attorney Kathleen Field Orr By notice complying with the requirements of this Section, each parry shall have the right to change the address or addressee, or both, for all future notices and communications to such party, but no notice of a change of address or addressee shall be effective until actually received. The Developer may provide the name and contact information of a project lender to the City. In the event the Developer provides lender information, the lender shall be given notice and opportunity to cure any alleged breach by the Developer; provided, however, the Developer shall remain responsible for all obligations under this Agreement, the Utility Agreement and the Development Agreement. Article 7. Mutual Understandings 7.1 Ancillary Agreements. Any future development, utility, or infrastructure agreements required for the Project shall be set forth in the Utility Agreement, the Development Agreement and this PUD is subject to the terms of said agreements as negotiated, approved and executed by the City and the Developer. In addition, all future development and use of the Subject Property shall be subject to the Covenants and Restrictions as hereinabove provided, and adherence to these said agreements and Covenants and Restrictions shall be required as a condition to issuance of permits or commencement of relevant project phases. 7.2 Violations. In the event of a material breach of this Agreement, the Parties agree that the defaulting Party shall have sixty (60) days after notice of said breach to correct the same or diligently commence to cure said breach prior to the non -breaching Party's seeking of any remedy provided for herein. However, any breach by Developer reasonably determined by the City to involve health or safety issues may be the subject of immediate action by the City, without prior notice or a sixty (60) day cure period. The failure of the Parties to insist upon the strict and prompt performance of the terms, covenants, agreements, and conditions herein contained, or any of them upon any other party imposed, shall not constitute or be construed as a waiver or relinquishment 13 of any Party's right thereafter to enforce any such term, covenant, agreement, or condition, but the same shall continue in full force and effect. Written notice is required for any alleged breach. if cure cannot reasonably be completed within sixty (60) days, the cure period shall be reasonably extended as Long as diligent efforts are underway. 7.3 Enforcement: Remedies. A default under this Agreement that remains uncured after written notice specifying the breach and a sixty (60) day cure period, which shall be reasonably extended if cure cannot be completed within sixty (60) days and diligent efforts are underway shall permit the non -defaulting party to proceed with any and all remedies available under Illinois law. Remedies for breach are limited to specific performance, injunctive relief, or termination for a real, uncured material breach. Neither party shall be liable for monetary damages under this Agreement. 7A Amendments. This Agreement and the zoning applicable to the Subject Property may not be amended without the mutual consent of the Parties. Any amendment to the terms, covenants and agreements as set forth in this Planned Unit Development Agreement shall be in accordance with the provisions of Section 10-8-8G of the UDO which provides as follows: G. Amendments to Approved Planned Unit Development. 1. Determination of Level of Change. Upon receiving a Planned Unit Development Amendment application, the Zoning Administrator shall determine whether the amendment is a major amendment, or a minor amendment based on the criteria detailed in Section 10-8-8(G)(2) below. 2. Major Amendment. A major amendment is any proposed change to an approved Planned Unit Development that results in one or more of the following changes: a. More than a five percent (5%) increase in the square footage of the buildings; b. Any accessory structure or building, including rooftop mechanical equipment, which exceeds 78' in height; c. Except as otherwise set forth above, any deviation from the site data standards set forth on the Site Plan; d. Any deviation from applicable provisions of the UDO; e. Any revision to the approved site plan resulting in a change to: i. Building footprint where there is a change in building orientation that will, in the opinion of the City's Sound Consultant materially increase noise levels, substation, and stormwater basin layout and orientation; 14 ii. Number of substations, and stormwater basins (increase or decrease); iii. Location of parking; iv. Change in order of phasing plan; V. Reduction in height and location of landscape buffer, berm, and walking path; vi. Location and number of primary and secondary access points. f. Any change to the approved Site Plan that is not explicitly described as a minor amendment in this Agreement. Minor Amendment. A minor amendment is any proposed change to the approved site plan resulting in one or more of the following changes: a. An increase or decrease of parking stalls by no more than 5%; b. An increase or decrease of landscape types and quantities for any species by no more than 5%; c. An increase or decrease of percentage of approved building elevation materials by no more than 5%; d. A change in fencing material; Any revision to the approved site plan resulting in a change to building footprint where there is a change in building orientation that will not, in the opinion of the City's Sound Consultant, materially increase noise levels; f. Notwithstanding the City's UDO, the following shall be processed as Minor Amendments by the Zoning Administrator without public hearing. any reduction in the total Floor Area or any decrease in the number of buildings, provided no such removal or reduction results in a reconfiguration of buildings or any change in the approved site plan other than the removal of, or reduction in the size of, building(s). 4. Approval Processes. a. Major Amendment. A major amendment to an approved Planned Unit Development shall follow the procedure set in Section 10-8-8(F) of the UDO. b. Minor Amendment. I) Zoning Administrator Review. The minor amendment shall be reviewed and approved by the Zoning Administrator. 15 7.5 Governing.Law. This Planned Unit Development Agreement and the terms, provisions, and conditions herein shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois and if enforced by judicial proceedings, the parties agree that such proceedings shall be conducted in the Circuit Court of Kendall County, Illinois. 7.6 Counterparts. This Agreement is to be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which shall constitute the same instrument. 7. 7 Force Majeure. In the event the performance of any covenant to be performed hereunder by a Party is delayed for causes which are beyond the reasonable control of the Party responsible for such performance (which causes shall include, but not be limited to, acts of God; inclement weather conditions; global pandemic; strikes; material shortages; lockouts; the revocation, suspension, or inability to secure any necessary governmental permit, other than a City license or permit; and any similar case), the time for such performance shall be extended by the amount of time of such delay. Force majeure shall also include supply chain disruptions, delays or inability to obtain equipment or materials, utility or power grid shortages or delays, and governmental or regulatory actions, inactions, or delays (including those of the City) affecting approvals, permits, or operations. All deadlines, performance obligations, and cure periods under this Agreement shall be automatically extended for the duration of any force majeure event. 7.8 Successor and Assigns. This Agreement may not be assigned without the approval of the City until the Covenants and Restrictions have been recorded with the County of Kendall against the Subject Property. Once the Covenants and Restrictions have been recorded, this Agreement upon assignment shall inure to the benefit of, and be valid and binding upon, the Parties and their successors and assigns for the term of the Agreement. It is understood and agreed by the Parties hereto that in the event any part of the Subject Property is sold or conveyed at any time during the term of this Agreement after the recordation of the Covenants and Restrictions, all unaccrued obligations and responsibilities of the prior title holder to said part of the Subject Property conveyed shall be released and be assumed by such purchaser of the part of the Subject Property conveyed, and the prior title holder shall be fully released from all unaccrued obligations which relate thereto. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City shall not be required to release any Surety until the successor owner has posted replacement Surety for the improvement obligations being assumed by said successor owner, which Surety shall be in a form and amount acceptable to the City. In the event that part of the Subject Property is to be conveyed, the respective owners may enter into an agreement parsing respective obligations under this Agreement between the respective owners and the City shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such agreement. Developer may assign, subdivide, or transfer all or any portion of its interest in the Subject Property and this Agreement to any party, upon written notice to the City after the recordation of the Covenants and Restrictions where upon the City's consent is not required for any such assignment, subdivision, or financing. Upon such transfer, the transferee assumes all obligations for the assigned portion and the transferor is released from further liability for such portion. This Agreement and all rights and obligations hereunder shall run with the land and bind all successors and assigns. 16 7.9 Non -Merger of Entitlements. The rights, Entitlements, and protections established by this PUD Agreement are independent and shall not merge into the Development Agreement, Utility Agreement, or other agreement with the City, unless expressly stated in such subsequent agreement and approved in writing by Developer. 7.10 Severabilit . Should any provision of this Agreement or application thereof to any party or circumstance be held invalid, and such invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of this Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid application or provision, then all remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 7.11 Effective Date. Developer is contract purchaser of the Subject Property. To this end this Agreement shall not become effective until such time as the Developer has acquired the Subject Property, annexed the Subject Property to the City and the Development Agreement and the Utility Agreement have been approved and executed by the City and the Developer. If, for any reason, the City and the Developer do not execute the Development Agreement, or the Utility Agreement or agree to the Covenants and Restrictions, the Developer agrees that it shall have no recourse against the City for any cost, claim, liability or inconvenience in connection with the Project or the Subject Property and agrees to immediately pay the City for any outstanding contractual obligations. 7.12 Lender Protections. The existence of any mortgage, deed of trust, or other security interest encumbering the Subject Property shall not constitute a default under this Agreement, and Developer shall have no obligation to obtain subordination or consent from any lender. The City shall, within fifteen (15) business days of written request, execute commercially reasonable lender estoppel certificates, nondisturbance agreements, or similar documents as reasonably requested by Developer's lenders. 7.13 Entire Agreements. This Agreement, the Annexation Agreement, the Utility Agreement and the Development Agreement, together with all attached Exhibits, and the provision of the Covenants and Restrictions constitute the entire agreement between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, whether written or oral. This Agreement, the Annexation Agreement, the Utility Agreement and the Development Agreement may only be amended by a written instrument executed by both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates set forth below their respective signatures, to be effective as of the Effective Date. Uni 17 IN Date: 0 \&,11 ) PCf I 3 2025 Pioneer Development, LLC Al Date: 2025 18 Date:2025 Pioneer Development,LLC I By:A Cr :71 Date:l / I ` 2025 18 EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit A- Site Plan Exhibit B- Phasing Plan Exhibit C- Proposed Path Locations Map Exhibit D- Landscape Plan Exhibit E- Building Elevations Exhibit G- Initial Noise Study 19 ell I m Bill i iom 11W zCLzw0julwLLIz0CLI Exhibit D: Landscape Plan Pendin This page intentionally left blank. The Landscape Plan for this Planned Unit Development is currently under review and will be included as Exhibit D once approved. Final approval of the Landscape Plan is contingent upon review and approval by City staff and the City Attorney, in accordance with the conditions of approval adopted by the City Council on November 10, 2025. LLIF- Xm F LMIMIXT, N- 0 Mm - n%: 7 RI110 z0LujLUza. 01LLBul0LLILLIz0ILI L J Zo a U w JLU 0 C w r x t. 1J N w a O w L 1 J L Z. C) LU0wDL I L J eJZ U3 ZyQ0 z z0 i wlLU C) w W w O- f 7 S Z r' o slcn . I tQ , `-' a B . LhZQZO PP3 DF UW i o! wn z0F- awJit[ xF0N Jjwz in zZo0MOC Z) x1740co ti wC) LL0F- z LLJ o 0- LL r) zwxIL0ALLILUELFLLIz0MI i 7 N0I13! lVISNO7 80A ! ON ANMNI WI l3 tld C4 i p co B R afLLIz x© 5va HOI IVN X' dVNl641138d e LU z U) z oKaDy4210 7t w Jzin UJ rr, 9 Q F U LUuaC. U) U W LLILLHZLVIILOJN7LNWLilZOa1 EXHIBIT G BURNS MSDONNELL' July 9, 2025 Project Cardinal - Design Team Pioneer Development Re: Project Cardinal Preliminary Sound Study Burns & McDonnell was retained by Pioneer Development ("Pioneer") to conduct a preliminary sound study (the "Study") for the proposed Project Cardinal Data Center Development (the "Project"). The objective of the Study was to estimate future noise impacts from operational equipment at the Project's property boundaries. The Project is proposed to be located in Yorkville, Illinois. The current site plan is presented in Figure 1 and includes fourteen 14) two-story data center buildings. The design includes eleven (11) Large (-680, 600 square foot) buildings and three (3) smaller 390,000 square foot) buildings. The large buildings were modeled with 108 rooftop chillers and 80 auxiliary generators at ground level. The smaller buildings include 54 rooftop chillers and 40 auxiliary generators. The buildings, barriers, layout, and equipment counts were provided by Pioneer for the current design. However, this design is preliminary and would likely evolve throughoutthe detailed design stages of the Project. This analysis included predictive modeling to estimate Project -generated sound levels in the surrounding community for two operational scenarios. A comparison to the local sound level limits was performed at the Project boundaries. Sound Level impacts at the nearest noise sensitive receptors would be expected to be Lower as Project -generated sound would attenuate as it moves offsite. Acoustic Terminology The term "sound level" is often used to describe two different sound characteristics: sound power and sound pressure. Every source that produces sound has a sound power level (PWL). The PWL is the acoustical energy emitted by a sound source and is an absolute number that is not affected by the surrounding environment. The acoustical energy produced by a source propagates through media as pressure fluctuations. These pressure fluctuations, also called sound pressure levels (SPL), are what human ears hear and microphones measure. Sound is physically characterized by amplitude and frequency. The amplitude of sound is measured in decibels (dB) as the Logarithmic ratio of a sound pressure to a reference sound pressure (20 micropascals). The reference sound pressure corresponds tothetypical threshold of human hearing. To the average Listener, a MB change in a continuous broadband sound is generally considered "just barely perceptible"; a 5-dB change is generally considered "clearly noticeable"; and a 10-dB change is generally considered a doubling (or halving, if the sound is decreasing) of the apparent loudness. Sound waves can occur at many different wavelengths, also known as the frequency. Frequency is measured in hertz (Hz) and is the number of wave cycles per second that occur. The typical human ear can hear frequencies ranging from approximately 20 to 20,000 Hz. Normally, the human ear is most sensitive to sounds in the middle frequencies (1,000 to 8,000 Hz) and is less sensitive to sounds in the lower and higher frequencies. As such, the A -weighting scale was developed to simulate the frequency response of the human ear to sounds at typical environmental levels. The A -weighting scale emphasizes sounds in the middle frequencies and de-emphasizes sounds in the low and high frequencies. Any sound level to which the A -weighting scale has been applied is expressed in A -weighted decibels, or dBA. Sound in the environment is constantly fluctuating, as when a car drives by, a dog barks, or a plane passes overhead. Therefore, sound metrics have been developed to quantify fluctuating environmental sound levels. These metrics include the exceedance sound level. The exceedance sound level is the sound level exceeded during "x" percent of the sampling period and is also referred to as a statistical sound level. Common exceedance sound level values are the 10-, 50-,90-percentile exceedance sound levels, denoted by L1o, LSo, and L9o. The equivalent -continuous sound level (Leq) is the logarithmic average (i.e., energy 9400 Ward Parkway I Kansas City, MO 641141 burnsmcd.com Project Cardinal - Design Team Pioneer Development July 9, 2025 Page 2 average) of the varying sound over a given time period and is the most common metric used to describe sound. The L90 is typically considered the "background" sound level since it excludes many short, intermittent sounds and captures the sound levels experienced most of the time (i.e., sound levels 90 percent of the time). City of Yorkville Noise Ordinance The Code of Ordinances of Yorkville, Illinois Title IV, Chapter 4 limits noise levels from the Project. The ordinance states, "No person shall operate or cause to be operated any source of sound in such a manner as to create a sound level which exceeds the sound level limits in table 1 of this section, as adjusted according to table 2 of this section." Table 1 is reproduced below. Table 1: Sound Level Limits Receiving Property Land Use Time of Day Residential commercial Daytime (7:00 a.rn. -10:00 p.m.) 60 dBA Nighttime (10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m.) 50 dBA 67 dBA 67 dBA Public Paris and Other Public Open Spaces 67 dBA 67 dBA Table 2 of the ordinance provides adjustments for varying durations of noise within a given hour aswell as penalties to applyfor noise of an impulsive character or tonal. The specific equipment manufacturers and models for the Project have not been selected at this time. The type of equipment that generates noise as part of the Project (chillers and emergency generators) does not operate in an impulsive manner and the equipment can be specified and procured to not emit prominent discrete tones or tonal noise. Provided the developer of the Project selects non -tonal equipment for operations, the continuous noise generated bythe Project would be limited to 60 dBA duringthe day and 50 dBA duringthe night at residential receptors. The City of Yorkville ordinance includes an exemption for "emergency short term operations." The City of Yorkville has confirmed that the operation of the emergency generators during a full blackout would be exempt from the noise limits according to the exemption. Design goals have been developed for the Project boundary based on the City of Yorkville ordinance. For normal operation, which could generate noise at any time of the day, the design goal is 50 dBA at the receiving residential property boundaries to meet the nighttime sound level limits. For generator testing, which occurs during daytime hours, the design goal is 60 dBA to meet daytime limits when maintenance generator testing would occur. Ambient Measurements Variations in noise environments are typically due to existing land uses, population density, and proximity to transportation corridors. Elevated existing ambient sound levels in the region occur near major transportation corridors such as interstate highways and in areas with higher population densities. Principal contributors to the existing noise environment likely include motor vehicle traffic on local roadways, typical agricultural noise sources, and natural sounds such as birds, insects, and leaf or vegetation rustle during elevated wind conditions. Diurnal effects result in sound levels that are typically quieter duringthe night than duringthe daytime, except during periods when evening and nighttime insect noise dominates in warmer seasons. Burns & McDonnell personnel conducted sound level measurements to establish the existing background sound levels in the area surrounding the Project site. Sound levels were measured using Larson Davis Model 821 sound level meters with associated preamplifiers and 1/2-inch free -field precision microphones meeting American National Standards Institute (ANSI) S1.4Type 1 specifications. One-half inch random -incidence microphones were used on the meters. All measurement and field Project Cardinal - Design Team Pioneer Development July 9, 2025 Page 3 calibration equipment were certified by a traceable Laboratory within 12 months prior to the measurement. Field calibration confirmations were performed before and after the Long-term measurements and before and after each set of short-term measurements. The meter and calibrator were checked within a year prior of the measurements to verify compliance with the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology specifications. The calibration drift was within tolerance over the duration of the measurement survey. The sound survey protocol was developed based on procedures outlined in the ANSI 12.9 Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound standard. Continuous sound level measurements were cotlected near the boundaries of the proposed Project in the four cardinal directions. The meters were placed in the directions of the nearest residential receivers, set back from the roadways the appropriate distance per the standard. The survey was undertaken continuously from June 17 to 18, 2025, during daytime and nighttime hours. Weather data was reviewed from a nearby weather station (Weather Station ID: KILYORKV81). Average wind speeds were within ANSI guidance and the only recorded precipitation recorded during the measurement period was at the very end of the measurement at 1:00 p.m. on June 1811. The measurement Locations are provided in Figure 2 of Attachment l . A summary of the ambient measurements is provided in Table 2 below and hourly average sound levels are provided in Attachment 2. Table 2: Continuous Sound Leve Monitoring Summary Leo 90 -. . Lao Measurement Location Time of Day flBA) d Daytime 69 52 MP1 Nighttime 67 a0 Daytime 61 44 MP2 Nighttime 59 39 Daytime 69 48 M P3 Nighttime 67 40 Daytime 59 37 M P4 Nighttime 57 37 Sound levels in the Project area were variable; the major noise sources across the Project area included localtraffic (passenger cars and Large trucks) and typical sounds of nature (insects and bird calls). Transient noise levels were greater along local traffic thorough fairs (Highway47 and Galena Road). Sound levels are provided in both Leq and Lgo to represent the background ambient sound levels for the Project. The Lgo sound levels exclude the majority of the instantaneous and intermittent noise from occasional traffic. L-90 is generally used to represent the typical background noise fora given area. Sound Modeling Methodology Sound modeling was performed using the industry -accepted sound modeling software Computer Aided Noise Abatement CadnaA), version 2025. The software is a scaled, three-dimensional program that takes into account air absorption, terrain, ground absorption, reflections and shielding for each piece of sound -emitting equipment and predicts sound pressure levels. The model calculates sound propagation based on International Organization of Standardization (ISO) 9613-2:2024, General Method of Calculation. ISO 9613-2 assesses the sound leveL propagation based on the octave band center -frequency range. The ISO standard considers sound propagation and directivity. The software calculates sound propagation using omnidirectional, downwind sound propagation and worst -case directivity factors. In other words, the model assumes that each piece of equipment propagates its worst -case sound Levels in all directions at all times. Empirical studies accepted within the 3 Project Cardinal - Design Team Pioneer Development July 9, 2025 Page 4 industry have demonstrated that modeling may aver -predict sound levels in certain directions, and as a result, modeling results generally are considered a conservative measure of a project's actual sound level. The modeled atmospheric conditions were assumed to be calm, and the temperature and relative humidity were left at the program's default values. Reflections and shielding were considered for sound waves encountering physical structures. Project Sound Sources The sound level design goal is appLicabLe at the Project property line and the most impacted locations were identified surrounding the Project. Project sound sources were modeled in the locations shown in Figure 1 of Attachment 1. A summary of the modeling assumptions for each piece of equipment is provided in Table 3. Table 3: Predictive Modeling Sound Level Inputs Modeled Equipment Sound Level Source Number of sources Assumption' Chillers (Low -Noise) 1,350 LW=91 dBA Emergency Generators 1,000 Lp = 65 dBA at 50 feet Substation Transformer (Low Noise) 17 Lw = 89 dBA a) Lw=soundpowerlevel;Lp=soundpress ureLevel, dBA=A-weighted decibels, NtMA=ivauonai=iecu1U@-IdI1U1-uicia QU% Chillers Each chiller was estimated to have an overall sound power Level of 91 dBA. This would Likely be a Low -noise option, or a model which may include mitigation in detailed design. The manufacture and model type forthe chillers have not been selected at this time. To determine if a chiller for this data center could meet an overall sound power level of 91 dBA, Burns & McDonnell started with a common air-cooled chiller used in these applications, the York YVFA with 390-ton cooling capacity. The York unit is provided with an operating sound power level between 97 dBA (75% load) and 100 dBA (100% load). The units would likely operate at significantly quieter sound levels during nighttime hours, but due to the preliminary nature of this design, the load eveL during nighttime hours is unknow. The unit's octave band sound levels, showthatthe unit operates as a broadband source and does not operate in a tonal nature. To got down to a 91 dBA sound power level, additional mitigation would be required for these units. Chiller add -on mitigation would need to provide 6-9 dBA reductions to meet the design goal and can typically be supplied for these units through a supplier Like BRD Hush Core. Some of their common add on mitigation options are listed below. 1. Standard ( 2-5 dBA reduction) a. Treatment of the compressor circuits for chillers . HUSH COVERS are used for the compressor housing, suction and discharge piping and oil separator vessels. 2. Unitary ( 4-6 dBA reduction) a. The Unitary System is a top mounted, unit supported plenum style acoustically insulated stack constructed using HUSH GUARD'" sound panels. 3. Louver ( 5-7 dBA reduction) a. The Louver System uses high performance type HUSH DUCT silencers up to 36" deep for direct boltingto the chiller cabinet/ frame. 4. Summit ( 9-15 dBA reduction) a. The Summit System for air-cooled chillers is a high-performance source -applied treatment of the chiLLer's intakes and discharge fans using Hush Guard panels and Hush Duct Silencers. 4 Project Cardinal - Design Team Pioneer Development July 9, 2025 Page 5 During detailed design, nighttime cooling loads would be considered, and this level of noise mitigation may not be required. The standard offering of sound level reductions are shown above to confirm that mitigated chillers could reasonably get down to the levels specified in Table 3. Other chiller mitigation options include using a different chiller, sound walls, and relocation of the chiller equipment. Havingthe chillers on top of the building puts the chillers further away from the property boundaries and reduces the potential for offsite noise impacts. Emergency Generators Each emergency generator was estimated to have an overall sound power level of 105 dBA (sound pressure level of 65 dBA at 50 feet). The generators were modeled inclusive of both the generator enclosure and exhaust stack. Substation Transformers The Project is expected to include seventeen (17) 167-megavalt-ampere (MVA) substation transformers. According to National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) TR-1, the 167-MVA transformers would have a standard sound pressure level of 75 dBA, measured in accordance with the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Standard C57.12.90. The IEEE Standard requires sound level measurements to be averaged around the unit, measured at distances of 1 foot from the tank of the transformer and 6 feet from fan cooled surfaces. Based on typical transformer sizes the sound power level is expected to be around 95 dBA. In order to meet the City sound level limits at the property lines low -noise transformers would need to be specified to not exceed 89 dBA sound power level. The 89 dBA sound power level transformers were included in the predictive model. Operational Scenario Assumptions The model was evaluated for two operational scenarios: Normal Operation and Generator Testing. Normal Operation represents the condition where all campus chillers are at 100% load without the use of generators. Generator Testing represents the condition where all campus chillers are at 100% load and two generators per data center building are being tested at 100% load. Emergency operations would represent a condition during an emergency situation where all equipment is operation and running at 100% load. The emergency operation scenario was not modeled because it is not considered "normal conditions" and the City of Yorkville confirmed the emergency scenario is exempt from the limits. A summary of each modeled scenario is provided in Table 4. Table 4: Summary of Operating Scenarios Operating Scenario Normal Operation Generator Testing Emergency Operation Design Goal 50 dBA at property lines 60 dBA at property lines Equipment in Operation for Each Scenario Chiller All On at 100% Load All On at 10011/a Load All On at 3GO% Load Generators Transformers ALL Off All On 2 per Building at 100% Load All On All On at 1000/a Load ALL Off Sound Modeling Results The Project equipment was modeled using the provided sound level assumptions for Normal Operation and Generator Testing scenarios. A tabulated summary of the most impacted property line location is provided in Table 5. Project Cardinal- Design Team Pioneer Development July 9, 2025 Page 6 Table 5, Modeled Project Sound Levels at Property Lines Receiver Modeled Sound Level (dBA) Normal Operation Generator Testing Boundary NW 48 49 Boundary N 50 50 Boundary NE 50 50 Boundary E 49 49 Boundary 5E 50 50 Boundary 5W 49 49 Boundary NW 48 49 The most impacted property line receivers were modeled to be below the design goals during Normal Operation and Generator Testing. Sound level contours were generated for the two operating scenarios, in 5-dBA increments, at a height 5 feet above grade as shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4 of Attachment 1. Conclusion Burns & MCDonneLt provided an acoustic analysis for the proposed Project Cardinal data center based on representative equipment sound Levels and the site plan provided. The modeling results show that the Project design can feasibly meet the City of Yorkville sound level limits using low -noise chillers. Placingthe chillers on top of the buildings puts the unitsfarther from the Project property boundaries, which is used to help reduce noise oflsite. Specifying non -tonal chillers when purchased will allow the Project to not emit prominent discrete tones offsite and would not require a 10-dBA penalty be applied to the limits. Sincerely, Burns & McDonnell Gabriel Weger Section Manager —Acoustics Attachments Attachment 1— Figures Attachment 2— Measurement Data Attachment's — Figures 9Z1 OS l4O NO117fl 21f5NA7 1103 ION - kHVN1W113Hd 1 1---------- rwa--- ter- 1 1 - a'----'------"-------- m I I is" i I I a I it J I r zUF_ WQa zaIa. LUU_ ZWa0WwaWwza CD Ln QQ m mUO d Ln ll m LnaU ro N i L yJ Q L t V L a a` m z Ws syu waiaAS aleuP ou uae sa n6i san6S 51` VevaxaylauiPse' 419 A tanadeaauwd sapj paby idap aaloM M afoy: 9 piled 1 y I j yyjoL 9 Z u zM C a, mYI 3 I/ # D NG u le. r70 i a Y F i Z J_ L K wi V W aiC L L auc mLn IO wI i 1m m m CO 0 - 0Ln 111 r LO Ln v a N o aa za awmu ImI aV f1 weiaAS aieuiWorJ ua aaanS sam8 51mauozay{ eviWe . L9iA LVanaNaauofdlsaN iaab dliQeO asinN- nMepalad1: 9 : 4 ed Attachment 2 - Measurement Data Project Cardinal Attachment 2 N$BURNS MSDONNELL- vage5ou>dLevels-MPOl Time MPQI dBA] Leq L10 L50 L90 6/17/25 11:00 AM 70 73 65 54 6/17/25 12:00 PM 69 73 65 55 6/17/25 1:00 PM 69 73 65 53 6/17/25 2:00 PM 68 72 65 50 6/17/ 25 3:00 PM 69 72 65 54 6/17/25 4:00 PM 69 71 65 55 6/ 17/25 5:00 PM 68 71 65 54 6/ 17/25 6:00 PM 67 71 65 52 6/17/25 7:00 PM 66 69 61 48 6/ 17/25 8:00 PM 65 68 59 47 6/17/25 9:00 PM 67 68 58 46 6/17/25 10:00 PM 66 71 58 45 6/17/25 11:00 PM 64 66 48 38 6/18/25 12:00 AM 63 63 45 35 6/19/25 1:00 AM 60 60 40 32 6/18/25 2:00 AM 63 62 43 33 6/18/25 3:00 AM 66 66 49 40 6/18/25 4:00 AM 66 69 53 42 6/18/25 5:00 AM 70 73 63 48 6/18/25 6:00 AM 70 74 66 51 6/18/25 7:00 AM 70 73 66 52 6/18/25 8:00 AM 69 73 65 52 6/18/25 9:00 AM 70 74 65 53 6/18/25 10:00 AM 70 74 65 50 6/18/25 11:00 AM 71 75 67 54 6/18/25 12:00 PM 70 73 65 51 6/18/25 1:00 PM 65 76 69 56 Average Daytime: 69 72 64 52 Average Nighttime: 67 67 52 40 Note: The average Leq daytime and nighttime sound levels shown are the logarithmic energy average of the 1-hoursound levels measured. The L10, L50, and L90 are the arithmetic averages of the 1-hour values Project Cardinal Attachment 2 WMSDONNELL- WN, Time MPoz dBA] Leq L10 L50 L90 6/17/25 12:00 PM 61 73 55 47 6/17/25 1:00 PM 61 73 54 46 6/17/25 2:00 PM 62 73 S3 44 6/17/25 3:00 PM 6/17/25 4:00 PM 60 59 72 72 53 55 45 45 6/17/25 5:00 PM 59 71 54 43 6/17/25 6:00 PM 58 71 52 39 6/17/25 7:00 PM 65 71 49 37 6/17/25 8:00 PM 57 69 50 39 6/17/25 9:00 PM 60 68 52 42 6/17/25 10:00 PM 60 68 51 41 6/17/25 11:00 PM 56 71 48 38 6/18/25 12: 00 AM 54 66 41 36 6/18/25 1:00 AM 53 63 39 35 6/18/25 2:00 AM 54 60 41 35 6/18/25 3.00 AM 6/18/25 4:00 AM 57 60 62 66 44 48 39 42 6/18/ 25 5:00 AM 62 69 54 45 6/18/25 6:00 AM 61 73 54 44 6/18/25 7:00 AM 61 74 53 44 6/18/25 8:00 AM 6/18/25 9:00 AM 61 60 73 73 1 54 53 44 44 6/18/25 10:00 AM 61 74 53 43 6/18/25 11:00 AM 62 74 56 47 6/18/25 12:00 PM 60 75 53 41 6/18/25 1:00 PM 61 73 59 54 Average Daytime: 61 72 53 44 Average Nighttime: 59 66 46 39 Note: The average Leq daytime and nighttime sound levels shown are the logarithmic energy average or the I -hour sound levels measured. The LIO, L50, and L90 are the arithmetic averages of the 1-hour values Project Cardinal Attachment 2 N BURNS l.MMONNE.LL_ hy++'I Time M P03 dBA] Leq L10 150 L90 6/17/25 12:00 PM 68 72 56 43 6/17/25 1:00 PM 68 72 56 44 6/17/25 2:00 PM 69 73 60 46 6/17/25 3:00 PM 70 74 66 51 6/17/25 4.00 PM 70 74 67 54 6/17/25 5:00 PM 71 74 66 53 6/17/25 6:00 PM 68 73 61 49 6/17/25 7:00 PM 67 72 57 46 6/17/25 8:00 PM 66 71 56 45 6/17/25 9:00 PM 66 70 56 42 6/17/25 10: 00 PM 67 71 58 45 6/17/25 11: 00 PM 64 66 50 42 6/18/25 12:00 AM 61 61 44 35 6/18/25 1:00 AM 61 59 41 35 6/18/25 2:00 AM 64 58 41 33 6/18/25 3:00 AM 61 60 44 37 6/18/25 4:00 AM 68 72 55 43 6/18/25 5:00 AM 71 75 61 49 6/18/25 6:00 AM 71 76 63 50 6/18/25 7:00 AM 71 75 63 50 6/18/25 8:00 AM 70 75 62 47 6/18/25 9:00 AM 69 74 58 46 6/18/25 10:00 AM 69 73 56 44 6/18/25 11:00 AM 71 75 61 48 6118/25 12.00 PM 70 74 61 46 6/18/25 1:00 PM 72 78 65 56 Average Daytime: 69 73 60 48 Average Nighttime: 1 67 65 1 49 40 Note: The average Leq daytime and nighttime sound levels shown are the fogorithmic energy overage of the 1-hour50und levels measured. The L10, L50, and L90 are the arithmetic averages of the 1-hour values Project Cardinal Attachment 2 & MmONNELL- M4 Time M PO4 dBAj Leq L10 L50 L90 6/17/25 12:16 PM 57 59 47 39 6/17/25 1:00 PM 56 59 45 38 6/17/25 2:00 PM 55 60 44 37 6/17/25 3:00 PM 57 61 44 36 6/17/25 4:00 PM 56 61 43 36 6/17/25 5:00 PM 57 62 42 35 6/17/25 6:00 PM 56 61 41 33 6/17/25 7:D0 PM 55 59 42 34 6/17/25 8:00 PM 55 60 45 33 6/17/ 25 9:00 PM 59 64 45 37 6/17/ 25 10,00 PM 63 69 46 38 6/17/ 25 11:00 PM 52 53 44 38 6/18/25 12:00 AM 50 50 38 33 6/18/25 1:00 AM 51 49 37 33 6/18/25 2,00 AM 55 46 40 35 6/18/25 3:00 AM 50 48 40 35 6/18/25 4:00 AM 55 56 43 39 6/18/25 5:00 AM 59 63 48 42 6/18/25 6:00 AM 60 64 48 41 6/18/25 7,00 AM 58 62 45 40 6/18/25 8:00 AM 58 62 45 39 6/18/25 9:00 AM 55 59 44 37 6/18/25 10.00 AM 56 60 42 36 6/18/25 11:00 AM 58 62 48 39 6/18/25 12:00 PM 57 62 46 33 6/18/25 1.00 PM 60 64 53 49 Average Daytime: 59 61 45 1 37 Average Nighttime: 57 54 42 137 Note: The average Leg daytime and nighttime sound levels shown are the logarithmic energy average of the 1-hour sound levels measured. The L10, L50, and L90 are the arithmetic averages of the 1-hour values 1 PINS BY OWNER Galena & 47TH LLC, MPLIV10 LLC PIN: 02-05-300-003 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-032 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-024 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-400-021 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-09-100-031 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-09-100-030 CITY OF YORKVILLE Sanjay & Sameer Gupta PIN: 02-04-100-015 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-200-007 UNINCORPORATED The Konicek Family Limited Partnership PIN: 02-06-100-022 UNINCORPORATED DALE L. KONICEK, LLC PIN: 02-06-200-002 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-400-022 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-05-200-006 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-100-016 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-06-400-008 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-06-200-003 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-05-100-003 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-05-100-005 UNINCORPORATED PIN: 02-05-400-009 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-018 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-04-300-017 CITY OF YORKVILLE PIN: 02-06-400-001 UNINCORPORATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OWNER: Sanjay & Sameer Gupta PARCEL 1: THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 5 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE WEST 40 CHAINS (RECORD), 2652.01 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH 38 1/2 LINKS (RECORD), 24.51 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTH BANK OF A DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES EAST (RECORD), NORTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST (MEASURED), 2593.76 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST, 232.55 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 68.93 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 59 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 68.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 265.04 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST, 57.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, 2 RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 4 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH ON THE SECTION LINE 26.80 CHAINS; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, 14.30 CHAINS; THENCE IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, 20.67 CHAINS EAST OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SECTION LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF LOT 2 LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE; BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 265.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 531.35 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 27 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 509.62 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST 150.53 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST, PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 912.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SAID POINT BEING 364.44 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4 (AS MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH LINE) AND SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF TERMINUS; IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. OWNER: Galena & 47th LLC and MPLIV10LLC PARCEL 1: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 19 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 990.0 FEET (15 CH.) TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 19 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 1.84 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 152 AT PAGE 392; THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 56 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, 1722.34 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT 907257 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 128.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 19 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 10.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 787.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, BEING A CIRCULAR CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1596.42 FEET CONCAVE TO THE WEST, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 13 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST, 773.94 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER, SAID POINT BEARING NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, 719.99 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, BEING A CIRCULAR CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1596.42 FEET CONCAVE TO THE WEST, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 31 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST, 205.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 45 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 88.42 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE CHICAGO-GALENA ROAD; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST, 41.71 FEET TO AN EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 152 AT PAGE 392; THENCE NORTH 29 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 39 3 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 267.87 FEET TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 9.74 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE NORTH 27 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 366.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 756.55 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING FROM SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 02 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, 581.48 FEET TO A POINT OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 163 AT PAGE 473; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, 22.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 AND THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON ROD MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREE 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1,550.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST 409.15 FEET PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 221.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST 115.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST 196.55 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 1,336.52 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST 600.81 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF GALENA ROAD AS NOW ESTABLISHED; THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 677.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 348.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST 599.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST 750.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 3: THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER 642.93 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 162.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 102 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WITH THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, MEASURED CLOCKWISE THEREFROM, 100.00 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 169.50 FEET, AS MEASURED PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE SOUTHERLY OF SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE, 14.66 FEET TO THE PRESENT CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD AS DEPICTED ON A PLAT RECORDED JUNE 5, 1964 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 145193; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PRESENT CENTER LINE, 1675.69 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PRESENT CENTER LINE BEING ALONG A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 42,975.00 FEET, 933.19 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, ALONG SAID PRESENT CENTER LINE, 64.12 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 957.16 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5, 920.88 FEET TO A POINT 4 WHICH IS 2,316.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE EASTERLY, 2,651.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF WHICH IS 2,326.70 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF, 2,686.96 FEET TO SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE, 101.94 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. OWNER: Dale L. Konicek, LLC TRACT 1: THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 5 AND THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 4, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON PIPE MONUMENT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREE 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1730.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 362.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST 2025.23 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT 73-2720; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 1,222.89 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 577.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 49 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 298.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST 15.64 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257; (THE NEXT 5 CALLS ARE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257) THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 170.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 1,000.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 36.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 925.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 2: THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST, LYING NORTHERLY OF A LINE EXTENDING EASTERLY FROM A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, 2316 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION, 2326.7 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY LINE PURSUANT TO DOCUMENT 73-2720, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ALSO; THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTH ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 2460.05 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE MOST SOUTHERLY LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED JULY 15, 1966 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 35339, BY A DEED DATED JANUARY 31, 1972 AND RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1972 AS DOCUMENT 72-467 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PROPERTY CONVEYED TO LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST 5 NUMBER 35339, WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 27 SECONDS TO THE LEFT WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 812.66 FEET, THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 49 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 366.94 FEET, THENCE EASTERLY 88 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 04 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 809.73 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 378.96 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ALSO; THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTH ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 2474.60 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED, THENCE WESTERLY ON A LINE WHICH FORMS AN ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 19 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 812.66 FEET, THENCE NORTH ALONG A LINE 89 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 03 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1.61 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE MOST SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED JULY 15, 1966 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 35339 BY DEED DATED JANUARY 31, 1972 AND RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1972 AS DOCUMENT 72-467, THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, A DISTANCE OF 812.66 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID EAST LINE, 13.55 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 3: LOT 2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 5 (EXCEPT THAT PART DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE WEST 40 CHAINS TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT, THENCE NORTH 38 1/2 LINKS TO THE SOUTH BANK OF DITCH, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 40 CHAINS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, 1961.60 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4, THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 667.0 FEET, THENCE SOUTH AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID NORTH LINE, 396.0 FEET, THENCE WEST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 667.0 FEET, THENCE NORTH AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 396.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 5 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE WEST 40 CHAINS (RECORD), 2652.01 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE NORTH 38 1/2 LINKS (RECORD), 25.41 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE SOUTH BANK OF A DITCH, THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST (RECORD), NORTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST (MEASURED), 2593.76 FEET (MEASURED) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST, 232.55 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 68.93 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 6 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 59 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 68.88 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 265.04 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST, 57.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING) IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 4: THAT PART OF LOT 2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY OF SAID SECTION 4, LYING WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2, THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 265.04 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 531.35 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 27 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 509.62 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST 150.53 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST, PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 110.00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE, 912.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SAID POINT BEING 364.44 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4 (AS MEASURED ALONG SAID NORTH LINE) AND SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF TERMINUS, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 5: PARCEL 1: THAT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 4, PART OF SECTION 5, PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD AS NOW ESTABLISHED ACROSS SAID SECTION 5 WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 2673.13 FEET TO A POINT 2327.34 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST 1323.10 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST 2325.56 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 06 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1319.49 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 1828.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 08 MINUTES EAST 3596.80 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 781.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 300.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 40 MINUTES EAST 291.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST 240.28 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 01 SECONDS EAST 1428.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 991.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST 1745.17 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 1373.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 600.81 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID GALENA ROAD; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 44 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID 7 CENTER LINE, 3318.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN LYING SOUTH OF A LINE EXTENDING EASTERLY FROM A POINT ON SAID WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 WHICH POINT IS 1876.07 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5 TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 5 WHICH POINT IS 1828.85 FEET SOUTH OF SAID NORTH QUARTER CORNER, AND EXCEPT A STRIP OF LAND 205.00 FEET WIDE IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 AND THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1828.85 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 10, 1967, KNOWN AS TRUST NO. 35913 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 154368 IN BOOK 152, PAGE 392 AS SAID NORTH LINE IS MONUMENTED AND OCCUPIED, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS LINE "B", FOR THE POINT OR BEGINNING; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID LINE "B", A DISTANCE OF 3596.80 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF ROB ROY DITCH FORMING AN ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 57 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 205.00 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 205.00 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANT SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE AFORESAID LINE "B"; THENCE WEST ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 3598.47 FEET TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE 205.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND ALSO EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID SECTION 4 LYING EAST OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47, IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. AND ALSO EXCEPTING: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 4, THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 8 AND THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON ROD MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE 1,550.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST 409.15 FEET PERPENDICULAR TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 221.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST 115.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST 196.55 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 02 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST 1336.52 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 38 SECONDS WEST 600.81 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF GALENA ROAD AS NOW ESTABLISHED; THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 677.76 FEET, THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST 348.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST 599.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST 750.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AND ALSO EXCEPTING, THAT PART CONVEYED BY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 30, 2007 AS DOCUMENT 200700026496, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 5 AND THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 4, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE IRON PIPE MONUMENTING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID 8 SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 1730.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 362.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST 2026.23 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT 73-2720; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 1,222.89 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF ROB ROY DITCH; THENCE SOUTH 03 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 577.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 298.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST 15.64 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257; (THE NEXT 5 CALLS ARE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PER DOCUMENT 907256 AND 907257) THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 170.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST, 1,000.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST 10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 38.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 925.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2: THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 AND NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SECTION LINE 1331.4 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 00 SECONDS MEASURED FROM WEST TO SOUTH FROM THE SECTION LINE, 2321.5 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, MEASURED FROM NORTH TO WEST FROM THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 1328.7 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE SECTION LINE, FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 00 SECONDS MEASURED FROM EAST TO SOUTH FROM THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 146.4 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, MEASURED FROM NORTH TO WEST FROM THE SECTION LINE, 1553 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, MEASURED FROM EAST TO NORTH FROM THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 2461.1 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 6; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1534 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, LYING SOUTH AND WEST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT 1876.07 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY BY DOCUMENT NO. R73-2841 (TRACT 1); THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1133.17 TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 415.0 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANT EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO EARL P. AND EMMA V. KONICEK BY DEED RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 136414 IN BOOK 126, PAGE 41; THENCE NORTH ON SAID PARALLEL LINE, ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO SAID COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY BY DOCUMENT NO. R73-2841, 1897.19 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6 AND THE POINT OF TERMINATION; AND ALSO EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE 9 EXTENDED EASTERLY FROM A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 5 WHICH POINT IS 1876.07 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5 TO A POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SECTION 5, WHICH POINT IS 1828.85 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5, ALL IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. TRACT 6: PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 6; TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 3407.85 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO SUSAN SCHMIDT BY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 1929 IN BOOK 80, PAGES 334 AND 335; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO SUSAN SCHMIDT A DISTANCE OF 1552.74 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO EARL P KONICEK AND WIFE BY WARRANTY DEED DATED DECEMBER 4, 1961 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 136414, THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO EARL P. KONICEK AND WIFE 1240.82 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD, FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH ALONG THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE 919.13 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT WHICH IS 1312.43 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANCE NORTH OF SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 26 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 35 SECOND TO THE RIGHT WITH A PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 332.08 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF PARCEL TWO OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 45553 BY CONSERVATORS DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1973 AS DOCUMENT 73-4671; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE FORMING AN ANGLE OF 62 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 01 SECONDS TO THE RIGHT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE 646.8 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF BEECHER ROAD; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 1362.40 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 460.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ALSO, THAT PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF GALENA ROAD WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 70 DEGREES 55 MINUTES WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 276 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 8, 200 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 55 MINUTES EAST 270 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 1456.6 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 470.51 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL TWO OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST NUMBER 45553 BY CONSERVATORS DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1973 AS DOCUMENT R73-4671; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 1006.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL TWO 388.83 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID NORTH LINE WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN PARCEL ONE OF SAID DOCUMENT 73-4671; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL ONE A DISTANCE OF 115.02 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON SAID EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL ONE WHICH IS 1112.06 FEET PERPENDICULARLY DISTANCE NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH ALONG A LINE FORMING AN ANGLE 26 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 38 SECOND 10 TO THE LEFT WITH THE PROLONGATION OF THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE A DISTANCE OF 2329.35 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO DIANE R. KAPCHINSKI BY TRUSTEES DEED RECORDED JUNE 14, 1973 AS DOCUMENT 73-28243; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED TO DIANE R. KAPCHINSKI 812.68 FEET TO THE EAST LIEN OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, 1319.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, EXCEPT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION INCLUDED IN THE WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 24, 2020 AS DOCUMENT 202000016040. OWNER: The Konicek Family Limited Partnership A PART OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND PART OF SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6, THENCE EAST 19.508 CHAINS (1,287.528 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE FOR PLACE OF BEGINNING, THENCE EAST ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, 44.599 CHAINS (2,943.534 FEET), THENCE SOUTH 16 MINUTES WEST 56.242 CHAINS (3,711.972 FEET) TO THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 58 MINUTES WEST 3.473 CHAINS (229.218 FEET) ALONG THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 37 MINUTES WEST 52.777 CHAINS (3,483.282 FEET) ALONG THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 16 MINUTES WEST 8.03 CHAINS (529.98 FEET) ALONG THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 05 MINUTES EAST 10.258 CHAINS (677.028 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 01 MINUTE WEST 6.632 CHAINS (437.712 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 27 DEGREES 51 MINUTES EAST 11.60 CHAINS (765.6 FEET) TO AN IRON STAKE, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES EAST 11.535 CHAINS (761.31 FEET) TO THE CENTER OF THE HIGHWAY, THENCE NORTH 12 DEGREES 40 MINUTES EAST TO THE PLACE OF THE BEGINNING, SITUATED IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, EXCEPTING THEREFROM RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED FOR ASHE ROAD AND GALENA ROAD AND ALSO; EXCEPTING, THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 19.508 CHAINS (1287.53 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 40 MINUTES WEST, 22.655 CHAINS (1495.23 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES WEST, 11.535 CHAINS (761.31 FEET); THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST, 765.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72 DEGREES 01 MINUTES EAST, 437.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 05 MINUTES WEST, 637.63 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GALENA ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 77 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GALENA ROAD, 187.93 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 77 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE 136.30 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE CONTINUING EASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 14,285.00 FEET AND CHORD BEARING SOUTH 78 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST, 189.98 FEET TO A POINT OF BEND IN SAID RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH 14 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 51 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, 20.02 FEET TO A POINT OF BEND; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, BEING A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 14,265.00 FEET AND CHORD BEARING SOUTH 79 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 453.85 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENT; THENCE SOUTH 80 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 38 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, 29.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST, 528.48 11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST, 810.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 28 SECONDS WEST, 541.53 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ALSO EXCEPTING, THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING DESCRIBED BY COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 19.508 CHAINS (1287.53 FEET) TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EQUESTRIAN ESTATES AT LEGACY FARMS; THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 40 MINUTES WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND SAID EAST LINE EXTENDED SOUTHERLY, 22.655 CHAINS (1495.23 FEET); THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES EAST, 29.67 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ASHE ROAD AS RELOCATED FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 618.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 35 MINUTES EAST, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, A DISTANCE OF 355.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 25 MINUTES EAST, A DISTANCE OF 683.60 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ASHE ROAD; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1482.39 FEET, WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 10 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, 360.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Sold To: United City of Yorkville - 119899 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Bill To: United City of Yorkville - 119899 651 Prairie Pointe Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Certificate of Publication: Order Number: 78360 Purchase Order: State of Illinois - Cook Chicago Tribune Media Group does hereby certify that it is the publisher of the Aurora Beacon News Classified. The Aurora Beacon News Classified is a secular newspaper, has been continuously published Daily for more than fifty (50) weeks prior to the first publication of the attached notice, is published in the City of Aurora, Township of Aurora, State of Illinois, is of general circulation throughout that county and surrounding area, and is a newspaper as defined by 715 IL CS 5/5. This is to certify that a notice, a true copy of which is attached, was published 1 time(s) in the Aurora Beacon News Classified. The first publication of the notice was made in the newspaper, dated and published on 5/22/2026, and the last publication of the notice was made in the newspaper dated and published on 5/22/2026. This notice was also placed on a statewide public notice website as required by 715 ILCS 5/2. 1. PUBLICATION DATES: 22 May 2026. Aurora Beacon News Classified In witness, an authorized agent of The Chicago Tribune Media Group has signed this certificate executed in Chicago, Illinois on this 23 May 2026, by Chicago Tribune Company _________________________________________ Jeremy Gates Page 1 of 3 Page 2 of 3 Page 3 of 3