Loading...
Plan Commission Minutes 2006 10-11-06 Page 1 of 5 APPROVED 11/08/06 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLAN COMMISSION YORKVILLE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2006 Chairman Tom Lindblom called the meeting to order at 7:17 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Charles Kraupner, Clarence Holdiman, Sandra Adams, Jack Jones and Tom Lindblom. Members absent: Bill Davis, Anne Lucietto, Brian Schillinger, and Michael Crouch. A quorum was established. CITY STAFF AND GUESTS Mayor Art Prochaska; City Attorney John Wyeth; Community Development Director Travis Miller; Lynn Dubajic, YEDC; consulting engineer Bill Dunn, Engineering Enterprises, Inc.; Tom Conrardy, Prudential Realty Co. Inc.; Carrie Hansen, Wiseman - Hughes; John Philipchuck, DBC &W Ltd.; David Schultz, SEC; Jim Snyder, Harlem Irving Company; Mike Schoppe, Schoppe Design and Associates; John Curtis; attorney Rob Gamrath; and attorney Dan Kramer. MINUTES Minutes from the August 9, 2006 meeting were approved without changes. Clarence Holdiman moved to approve the minutes. Charles Kraupner seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by voice vote. Minutes from the September 13, 2006 meeting were approved without changes. Kraupner moved to approve the minutes. Sandra Adams seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by voice vote. PUBLIC HEARING Adams made a motion to got to public hearing. Holdiman seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by voice vote. 1. PC 2006 -64 Wiseman- Hughes Enterprises, Inc., petitioner, has filed an application with the City of Yorkville to annex and rezone. See attached. Krapner made a motion to close the public hearing. Adams seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by voice vote. Page 2 of 5 ACTION ITEM Community Development Director Travis Miller commented on the Oct. 4 staff report. He said the city's comprehensive plan calls for a suburban neighborhood in this area with densities of 1.5 to 2.25 units per acre. This plan proposes a gross density of 2.16 units per acre so it falls with in the appropriate range. The comprehensive plan also requires developments with densities above 2.0 units per acre to comply with the design guidelines outlined in the plan. That would require the developer to assist with funding of offsite city infrastructure improvements. Miller said the city has discussed with Wiseman- Hughes and other developers along the Route 47 corridor to help with water and sanitary sever service expansions necessary to serve the area. Currently, the city isn't asking for anything specific, and is still working out details with the developers, Miller said. The developer also must agree to integrate certain architectural standards as part of the proposed agreement, Miller said. Although the code requires the developer to incorporate masonry product on the front fagade of 75 percent of buildings in the community, staff recommends 100 percent. Also, Miller said that while the code requires 50 percent of the front fagade to have masonry product, staff is recommending 75 percent, he said. Likewise, staff recommends that all other building sides have 25 percent masonry on them and each building must have a minimum of five major architectural features defined by the appearance code. Staff also recommends an increase from what is recommend in the code for landscaping requirements, Miller said. Meanwhile, the open space provided in the propose plan goes beyond what the city would require. Commissioner Jack Jones said he's always in favor of more masonry product and he asked why the city staff felt it was necessary to increase the requirements for this development. Miller said city staff is following the comprehensive plan, which calls for higher standards where densities are a little higher. He said he believes the city making a reasonable request. He also said the city is asking for more parking than what the current city ordinances ask for. However, the requested amount matches what the proposed city ordinance requires. Kraupner asked what types of materials qualify as masonry. Miller said brick, premium siding such as cedar and other stone are included. Page 3 of 5 Adams made a motion to recommend annexation approval for PC 2006 -64 as requested. Jones seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by roll call vote. Kraupner, Holdiman, Adams, Jones and Lindblom voted yes. Adams then made a motion to recommend rezoning for PC 2006 -64 as requested subject to staff comments. Kraupner seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by roll call vote. Holdiman, Adams, Jones, Kraupner and Lindblom voted yes. Jones made a motion to recommend concept PUD approval for PC 2006 -64. Adams seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by roll call vote. Adams, Jones, Kraupner, Holdiman and Lindblom voted yes. Adams made a motion to recommend preliminary PUD approval for PC 2006 -64 as presented subject to staff comments. Jones seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by roll call vote. Jones, Kraupner, Holdiman, Adams and Lindblom voted yes. PUBLIC HEARING Holdiman made a motion to return to public hearing. Adams seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by voice vote. 2. PC 2006 -65 Yorkville Partners LLC petition to rezone. See attached. Lindblom said the attorney for the petitioner requested the public hearing be continued to the Dec. 13, 2006 meeting. Adams made a motion to continue the public hearing for PC 2006 -65 to Dec. 13. Jones seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by voice vote. NEW BUSINESS 3. PC 2006 -34 Kendall Marketplace Final Plat Miller said the city wanted a blanket utility easement on the project. The petitioner felt it would be better if the utility easements were delineated. Miller said city staff isn't concerned that the delineated easements would substantially change the plat. Meanwhile, he said the final plat submitted substantially conforms to the preliminary plan the city already approved. The staff report does identify some setback issues. The representative for Kendall Marketplace said it would be impossible to meet the 20 -yard setback requirement for the way the planned Kohl's Department Store and therefore would need a variance. Miller said the issue isn't one that's appropriate for the Zoning Board of Appeals. It's simply an anomaly in the ordinance. Page 4of5 Bill Dunn, the city's consulting engineer from EEI said the majority of concerns he had have all been addressed. Jones said originally the Plan Commission was concerned about the density of the townhome component and suggested wider road widths in that area. The representative for Kendall Marketplace said the plan was altered to widen the drives by 15 feet. They're now at 65 feet. Adams made a motion to recommend final plat approval for PC 2006 -34 as requested subject to staff comments. Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed by a 4 -1 vote. Holdiman, Adams, Jones and Lindblom voted yes. Kraupner voted no. 4. PC 2006 -36 Aspen Ridge Estates Final Plat Rob Gamrath, representing the petitioner, said the final plat is in substantial compliance with the preliminary plat. There's only one outstanding staff comment. He said the city wants the developer to remove existing barbwire on the property and the developer is willing to comply. Dunn said his engineering comments have been addressed. Jones made a motion to recommend approval for final plat approval for PC 2006 -36 subject to staff comments. Kraupner seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by roll call vote. Adams, Jones, Kraupner, Holdiman and Lindblom voted yes. 5. PC 2006 -68, 69 and 70 Bristol Bav Final Plats Miller said the plats conform to the preliminary plan. There were some setback issues but those seem to have been met. Dunn said he has requested the petitioner revise some of the language in the plats and those revisions are being addressed. Jones made a motion to recommend final plat approval for PC 2006 -68, 69 and 70 Bristol Bay subject to staff comments. Adams seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by roll call vote. Jones, Kraupner, Holdiman, Adams and Lindblom voted yes. 6. PC 2006 -66 Nelson Mile and a Half Review Attorney Dan Kramer representing the petitioner said the property is located just west of the PNA camp. The petitioner, Glen Nelson, is seeking to rezone the property from Kendall County A -1 to Kendall County R -1. The lots would be at least three acres. The petitioner also would put in a private black top road. Kramer said the Plan Commission's charge is to determine if the requested zoning is appropriate. According to the city's comprehensive plan, the 11 -acre parcel falls under estate zoning. Page 5 of 5 Miller said the zoning request is consistent with the comprehensive plan. He said the staff is requesting a permanent access easement. Also, City Engineer Joe Wywrot has requested a turn around be put at the end of Glen Nelson Road. Kraupner said a development like this is refreshing to see. Adams made a motion to recommend approval of the 1.5 -mile review for PC 2006 -66 Nelson property as requested subject to staff comments. Jones seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by roll call vote. Kraupner, Holdiman, Adams, Jones and Lindblom voted yes. 7. PC 2006 -74 X -PAC Easement Vacation John Curtis said his client purchased lots 2 and 3 in the development and would like to put a 15,000 square foot retail center on the two parcels. To do so, they would need to vacate the lot line and the easements associated with the lot line between the two parcels. He's reviewed the issue with NICOR, ComEd, the cable company, and AT &T and three of the four have signed off on the vacation. Miller said the city's staff advised the petitioner to make the request. Jones made a motion to recommend the easement vacation for PC 2006 -74 as requested. Adams seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by roll call vote. Holdiman, Adams, Jones, Kraupner and Lindblom voted yes. At 8:07 p.m. Jones moved to adjourn the meeting. Adams seconded the motion. The motion was approved by voice vote. Minutes respectfully submitted by Dina Gipe I 1 PLAN COMMISSION MEETING 2 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS tj ,7 6 REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had at the meeting 7 of the above - entitled matter taken before 8 CHRISTINE M. VITOSH, C.S.R., on October 11, 2006, 9 at the hour of 7:00 p.m., at 800 Game Farm Road, 10 in the City of Yorkville, Illinois. 11 12 13 14 F &7 16 17 18 19 W8] 21 22 23 24 D- 806306 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 2 1 P R E S E N T: 2 MR. TOM LINDBLOM, Chairman; 3 MR. CLARENCE HOLDIMAN; 4 MS. SANDRA ADAMS; 5 MR. CHARLES KRAUPNER; 6 MR. JACK JONES; 7 MR. TRAVIS MILLER; 8 MS. DINA GIPE. 9 A P P E A R A N C E S: 10 MR. JOHN JUSTIN WYETH, appeared on behalf of the United 11 City of Yorkville, Illinois. 12 13 - - - - - 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 3 1 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: At this time 2 could I have a motion to go to public hearing, 3 please? 4 MS. ADAMS: So moved. 5 MR. JONES: Second. 6 MR. HOLDIMAN: Second. 7 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Moved and 8 seconded. Any discussion? 9 (No Response) 10 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Hearing none, 11 those in favor signify by saying aye. 12 (A Chorus of Ayes) 13 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Opposed? 14 (No Response) 15 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: And at this time 16 we'll go to public hearing. For those that wish 17 to talk to the Commission, address the Commission 18 tonight, please stand, raise your right hand, 19 repeat after me. 20 (Witnesses sworn) 21 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: First item is 22 PC 2006 -6, Weisman- Hughes, Enterprises, 23 Incorporated, petitioner, has filed an 24 application with the United City of Yorkville, Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 E 1 Kendall County, Illinois, requesting annexation 2 to the United City of Yorkville and rezoning 3 from Kendall County A -1 Agricultural to United 4 City of Yorkville Planned Unit Development zoning 5 to allow uses permitted in residential 6 districts -- 7 Is that R -3 or R -4? 8 MR. MILLER: It was applied for R -4. 9 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: R -4 and R -2. 10 The real property consists of approximately 91.8 11 acres east of Route 47 adjacent to and south of 12 the Windett Ridge subdivision, Yorkville, Kendall 13 County, Illinois. 14 John, you are speaking for 15 the -- 16 WHEREUPON: 17 JOHN PHILIPCHUCK, 18 having been first duly sworn, testified before 19 the Yorkville Plan Commission as follows: 20 MR. PHILIPCHUCK: Yes. Good 21 evening. My name is John Philipchuck. I am an 22 attorney with the law firm of Dommermuth, 23 Brestal, Cobine & West, with offices at 123 Water 24 Street, Naperville, Illinois. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 5 1 I am here this evening on 2 behalf of Weisman- Hughes Enterprises, Inc., the 3 petitioner. 4 As the Commission may recall, 5 we were before you last -- I think it was last 6 year, late last year, with a concept plan for the 7 Dhuse property, and I think that as you look 8 through your packet, you will see that the 9 concept plan that we have submitted for our PUD 10 and the preliminary plan and plat that you are 11 looking at this evening are very, very similar. 12 We did receive some good 13 comments from the Plan Commission, and as we went 14 on through the process we received comments from 15 the City Council, and so we are now before you 16 this evening requesting that the property be 17 considered for annexation. 18 It is contiguous to the 19 corporate limits of the United City of Yorkville 20 along the north boundary of the property. 21 As you have indicated, 22 Weisman- Hughes is currently developing a detached 23 subdivision, Windett Ridge, and, in fact, in a 24 component of this particular plan -- there was a Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 1 slight extension of that particular product from 2 the single- family that finishes that off, if you 3 will. 4 I think the Plan Commission 5 commented about the large open space when we were 6 before you last time, and we liked the elements 7 that were brought into the plan. 8 The annexation of the property 9 would be a logical extension of the corporate 10 boundaries and allow for the extension of 11 sanitary sewer and water along the frontage of 12 the property, and the plan, of course, is to 13 continue ultimately to the south crossing Ament 14 Road to get to the Heartland Crossing subdivision 15 that the Plan Commission has previously made 16 recommendations on. 17 The rezoning is a PUD, and, 18 therefore, there is no actual underlying zoning 19 classification. It is being treated as a PUD, 20 but then I think -- 21 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: John, excuse me. 22 I am just going to turn this a little bit so the 23 audience can see. 24 MR. PHILIPCHUCK: Okay. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 7 1 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Thank you. 2 MR. PHILIPCHUCK: You can see the 3 plan on the left is the concept plan. That 4 doesn't have quite the level of detail, of 5 course, that the preliminary plan does, and so 6 this would be the preliminary plan. It was part 7 of the PUD review process as you know. 8 You are looking at the concept 9 plan, then taking it to the next level for the 10 preliminary plan. 11 So the -- I am here this 12 evening with Carrie Hansen from Weisman - Hughes 13 Enterprises, Inc. and Mike Schoppe from Schoppe 14 Design Associates. 15 Mike will take you through the 16 plan and some of the rationale behind the concept 17 and the preliminary plan, how we have integrated 18 our open space within the development, and Dave 19 Schultz from Smith Engineering is here to answer 20 any civil engineering questions that you may 21 have. 22 So, with that, I would 23 introduce Mike Schoppe. 24 WHEREUPON: Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 rD 1 MIKE SCHOPPE, 2 having been first duly sworn, testified before 3 the Yorkville Plan Commission as follows: 4 MR. SCHOPPE: For the record, Mike 5 Schoppe with Schoppe Design Associates. Glad to 6 be back. 7 Let me go through some of the 8 highlights of the plan. Just briefly, you may 9 have remembered, it was a year ago when we 10 brought the concept plan forward. There hasn't 11 been a lot of changes, but I will review the plan 12 and maybe some of those changes that we have 13 made. 14 Really, as you can see from the 15 plan, the key component here is the amount of 16 open space that's in the project. 17 There is more than 50 percent 18 of the property that's in open space, and that's 19 a function of the fact that there is a townhome 20 product in the property at what we normally see 21 as a single- family type of density, and when you 22 put those two together, the outcome is a lot of 23 open space, and what that has provided for then 24 is this large 21 -acre school and park site, and Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 1 this is all additional open space in terms of 2 stormwater management, and land that would be 3 owned by the homeowner's association. 4 That in conjunction with a very 5 large setback off of Route 47, that's about 200 6 feet back -- actually it would be more than that. 7 200 feet back from our property line is where the 8 first building would be built, and there is very 9 few projects that we have in town that have that 10 kind of setback. 11 Like I said, we're going to be 12 a little bit further away from Route 47 than that 13 because between our property and the Route 47 14 right -of -way there is actually some land that's 15 owned by Commonwealth Edison, so the homes are a 16 little bit further back from the actual Route 47 17 right -of -way. 18 But it's spoken to in the 19 Comprehensive Plan about doing things a little 20 bit different here in the south part of town, and 21 that's the reason for the amount of open space 22 and using that open space for a large 200 -foot 23 setback along Route 47. 24 We've had discussions with Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 10 1 IDOT. On the earlier plans that we had we were 2 looking at making our road connection to 47 3 here. 4 Gerald and Dave and I had gone 5 down and talked with IDOT; they had asked us to 6 make that entrance down a little bit further 7 south. 8 That works for this plan for 9 the extension further east. It will also provide 10 that connection and a place to connect when the 11 property to the west of this is developed. That 12 road will be picked up and continued west. 13 This is a collector. It's 14 going to head over here west -- or east of 15 Penman, and then from Penman it's planned to 16 continue east over to Ashley. 17 This is a planned collector 18 that the city has had in the transportation plans 19 for some time. 20 So it's now being -- Originally 21 it was a 70 -foot right -of -way. We have now 22 increased that at the Staff's request to an 23 80 -foot right -of -way. 24 Most of this land -- All of the Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 11 1 development, most of the development, is pushed 2 up here to the west side of the property. That's 3 a function of road connections, but also a 4 function of the way the property will be served 5 in terms of gravity sewer going to the existing 6 sewer line up here. 7 We are making a new connection 8 to Windett Ridge in here, as well as picking up 9 the extension of existing right -of -way in Windett 10 Ridge, so we have -- as well as an extension of 11 another minor street, a local street, in here, so 12 we have looked at the surrounding uses and 13 provided adequate expansion for the road network. 14 A few of the -- We've gone 15 through Plan Council, we've got a -- we've worked 16 through a number of the Staff comments, we have 17 added additional townhomes -- or visitor parking 18 in the townhomes areas that had been requested, 19 we have made some minor adjustments to some 20 details of the cul -de -sac. 21 As you can see, we don't have 22 any lots with homes fronting on this drive. 23 That's at the request of the staff as to the -- 24 respecting the amount of traffic that that would Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 12 1 eventually have. 2 We have talked to the school 3 district and the park district -- or park board 4 about the 21 -acre site. 5 Remember in Windett Ridge there 6 is an existing seven -acre park site. That's this 7 piece right up in here. 8 So collectively, when all is 9 said and done, there is going to be a 28 -acre 10 open space area that's going to be used for two 11 things; one is a school, an elementary school 12 site, and the balance of it will be a park site, 13 and all that will be designed -- the Staff will 14 be working on some plans to see how all of those 15 components, whatever park components need to be 16 incorporated, can be organized and fit on the 17 property. 18 Once we have a better idea what 19 those plans are, then the line that's created 20 that says okay, here is the park line and here is 21 the school line can be created, but at this time 22 not knowing what all those improvements are 23 intended to be, striking a line is -- it really 24 can't be done. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 13 1 But what we have to do with 2 both of them is that yes, this is a desirable 3 site for an elementary school. They like the 4 size of the site, the geometry of the site, both 5 the park board and the school district. 6 Now we just have to work out 7 how those features are going to be organized on 8 the property and where that line can be created 9 that splits the two, but that will be confirmed 10 as we go into the final platting process. 11 So with that, that's an 12 overview of some of the highlights as to why 13 we've organized things the way we have, and I 14 guess that would end our presentation. 15 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Very good. At 16 this time are there any members of the public 17 that are here that wish to address the Commission 18 on this issue? Going once? 19 (No Response) 20 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Hearing none, I 21 guess at this point I would entertain a motion to 22 close the public hearing. 23 MR. KRAUPNER: So moved. 24 MS. ADAMS: Second. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 14 1 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Moved and 2 seconded. Any further discussion? 3 (No Response) 4 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Hearing none, 5 those in favor signify by saying aye. 6 (A Chorus of Ayes) 7 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Opposed? 8 (No Response) 9 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: The public 10 hearing is concluded and we will now enter into 11 discussion. 12 (discussion had off 13 the record) 14 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: At this time I 15 would entertain a motion then to go into public 16 hearing for PC 2006 -65. 17 MR. HOLDIMAN: So moved. 18 MS. ADAMS: Seconded. 19 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Moved and 20 seconded. Any further discussion on the motion? 21 (No Response) 22 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Hearing none, 23 those in favor signify by saying aye. 24 (A Chorus of Ayes) Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 15 1 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Opposed? 2 (No Response) 3 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: At this time 4 I'll read for the record, PC 2006 -65, Yorkville 5 Partners, LLC, petitioner, has filed an 6 application with the United City of Yorkville, 7 Kendall County, Illinois, requesting rezoning 8 from the United City of Yorkville M -1 Limited 9 Manufacturing District to United City of 10 Yorkville B -3 Service Business District. 11 The real property consists of 12 approximately 2.33 acres located on the southeast 13 corner of Illinois Route 47 and Beaver Street, 14 Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. 15 I do have a letter from the 16 petitioner, and I will read that for the record. 17 On behalf of the Yorkville Partners, LLC, I am 18 hereby requesting a continuance in the public 19 hearing scheduled before the Plan Commission on 20 Wednesday, October 11th, 2006, to the 21 December 13th, 2006 Plan Commission meeting. My 22 clients are continuing to follow up on some site 23 conditions. Thank you for your assistance in 24 this matter. Signed, John Philipchuck. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 16 1 At this point in time, is there 2 anybody that wishes to address the Commission 3 regarding this petition? 4 (No Response) 5 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Hearing none 6 then, I would recommend -- I would entertain a 7 motion that we postpone this until the 8 December 13th meeting. 9 MS. ADAMS: So moved. 10 MR. JONES: Second. 11 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: It's been moved 12 and seconded. Any further discussion on the 13 motion? 14 (No Response) 15 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Hearing none, 16 could we have roll call on that, please? 17 MS. GIPS: Charles Kraupner. 18 MR. KRAUPNER: Yes. 19 MS. GIPE: Clarence Holdiman. 20 MR. HOLDIMAN: Yes. 21 MS. GIPE: Sandra Adams. 22 MS. ADAMS: Yes. 23 MS. GIPE: Jack Jones. 24 MR. JONES: Yes. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 17 1 MS. GIPE: Tom Lindblom. 2 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Yes. Motion 3 passes. Thanks, John. 4 (Which were all the 5 proceedings had in 6 the public hearing 7 portion of the 8 meeting.) 9 --- 000 - -- 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Walt 20 21 22 23 24 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 m 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ss: 2 COUNTY OF LASALLE ) 10 4 CHRISTINE M. VITOSH, being first duly 5 sworn, on oath says that she is a Certified 6 Shorthand Reporter doing business in the State of 7 Illinois; 8 That she reported in shorthand the 9 proceedings had at the foregoing public hearing; 10 And that the foregoing is a true and 11 correct transcript of her shorthand notes so 12 taken as aforesaid and contains all the 13 proceedings had at the said public hearing. 14 IN WITNES WHEREOF I have hereunto set 15 my ha d this day of 16 'v " - - - -- 2006. 17 18 19 20 --------------------------- CHRISTINE M. VITOSH, C.S.R. 21 CSR License No. 084 - 002883 22 23 24 0 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 19 - -- 000 - -- 17:9 084 - 002883 18:24 11th 15:20 123 4:23 13th 15:21, 16:8 2.33 15:12 200 9:5, 9:7, 15:20 200 -foot 9:22 2006 15:21 2006- 3:22 2006 -6 15:4 2006 -65 14:16 2006.18:18 21 -acre 8:24, 12:4 28 -acre 12:9 4 9:5 47 4:11, 9:12, 9:13, 9:16, 9:23, 10:2, 15:13 50 8:17 70 -foot 10:21 7:00 1:9, 1:9 80 -foot 10:23 800 1:9 91.8 4:10 <A> A -1 4:3 above - entitled 1:7 acres 4:11, 15:12 actual 6:18, 9:16 actually 9:6, 9:14 ADAMS 2:4, 3:4, 13:24, 14:18, 16:9, 16:21, 16:22 added 11:17 additional 9:1, 11:17 address 3:17, 13:17, 16:2 adequate 11:13 adjacent 4:11 adjustments 11:19 aforesaid 18:14 ago 8:9 Agricultural 4:3 allow 4:5, 6:10 Ament 6:13 amount 8:15, 9:21, 11:24 annexation 4:1, 5:17, 6:8 answer 7:19 anybody 16:2 appeared 2:11 application 3:24, 15:6 applied 4:8 approximately 4:10, 15:12 area 12:10 areas 11:18 Ashley 10:16 assistance 15:23 Associates 7:14, 8:5 association 9:3 attorney 4:22 audience 6:23 away 9:12 aye 3:11, 14:5, 14:23 Ayes 3:12, 14:6, 14:24 <B> B -3 15:10 back 8:6, 9:6, 9:7, 9:16 balance 12:12 Beaver 15:13 behalf 2:11, 5:2, 15:17 behind 7:16 better 12:18 bit 6:22, 9:12, 9:16, 9:20, 10:6 board 12:3, 13:5 boundaries 6:10 boundary 5:20 Brestal 4:23 briefly 8:8 brought 6:7, 8:10 building 9:8 built 9:8 Business 15:10, 18:8 <C> C.S.R. 1:8, 18:23 call 16:16 Carrie 7:12 Certified 18:7 CHAIRMAN 2:2, 3:1, 3:7, 3:10, 3:13, 3:15, 3:21, 4:9, 6:21, 7:1, 13:15, 13:20, 14:1, 14:4, 14:7, 14:9, 14:14, 14:19, 14:22, 15:1, 15:3, 16:5, 16:11, 16:15, 17:2 changes 8:11, 8:12 Charles 2:5, 16:17 Chorus 3:12, 14:6, 14:24 CHRISTINE 1:8, 18:6, 18:23 City 1:2, 1:10, 2:12, 3:24, 4:2, 4:4, 5:15, 5:19,10:18, 15:6, 15:8,15:9 civil 7:20 Clarence 2:3, 16:19 classification 6:19 clients 15:22 close 13:22 Cobine 4:23 collectively 12:8 collector 10:13, 10:17 commented 6:5 comments 5:13, 5:14,11:16 Commission 1:1, 3:17, 3:17, 4:19, 5:4, 5:13, 6:4, 6:15, 8:3, 13:17, 15:19, 15:21, 16:2 Commonwealth 9:15 component 5:24, 8:15 components 12:15, 12:15 Comprehensive 9:19 concept 5:6, 5:9, 7:3, 7:8, 7:16, 8:10 concluded 14:10 conditions 15:23 confirmed 13:9 conjunction 9:4 connect 10:10 connection 10:2, 10:10, 11:7 connections 11:3 considered 5:17 consists 4:10, 15:11 contains 18:14 contiguous 5:18 continuance 15:18 continue 6:13, 10:16 continued 10:12 continuing 15:22 corner 15:13 corporate 5:19, 6:9 correct 18:13 Council 5:15,11:15 COUNTY 4:1, 4:3, 4:13, 15:7, 15:14, 18:3 course 6:12, 7:5 created 12:19, 12:21, 13:8 Crossing 6:13, 6:14 CSR 18:24 cul -de -sac 11:20 currently 5:22 <D> D- 806306 1:24 Dave 7:18, 10:4 day 18:17 December 15:21, 16:8 density 8:21 Design 7:14, 8:5 designed 12:13 desirable 13:2 detached 5:22 detail 7:4 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 20 details 11:20 developed 10:11 developing 5:22 Development 4:4, 7:18, 11:1, 11:1 Dhuse 5:7 different 9:20 DINA 2:8 discussion 3:8, 14:2, 14:11, 14:12, 14:20,16:12 discussions 9:24 District 12:3, 12:3, 13:5, 15:9, 15:10 districts 4:6 doing 9:19, 18:8 Dommermuth 4:22 done 12:9,12:24 down 10:5,10:6 drive 11:22 duly 4:18, 8:2, 18:6 <E> earlier 10:1 east 4:11, 10:9, 10:14, 10:16 Edison 9:15 elementary 12:11, 13:3 elements 6:6 end 13:14 Engineering 7:19, 7:20 enter 14:10 Enterprises 3:22, 5:2, 7:13 entertain 13:21, 14:15, 16:6 entrance 10:6 evening 4:21, 5:1, 5:11, 5:16, 7:12 eventually 12:1 excuse 6:21 existing 11:5, 11:9, 12:6 expansion 11:13 extension 6:1, 6:9, 6:10,10:9, 11:9, 11:10 <F> fact 5:23, 8:19 Farm 1:9 favor 3:11, 14:5, 14:23 features 13:7 feet 9:6, 9:7 few 9:9, 11:14 filed 3:23, 15:5 final 13:10 finishes 6:2 firm 4:22 First 3:21, 4:18, 8:2, 9:8, 18:6 fit 12:16 follow 15:22 follows 4:19, 8:3 foregoing 18:11, 18:12 forward 8:10 frontage 6:11 fronting 11:22 function 8:19, 11:3, 11:4 <G> Game 1:9 geometry 13:4 Gerald 10:4 GIPE 2:8, 16:17, 16:19, 16:21, 16:23, 17:1 Glad 8:5 gravity 11:5 guess 13:14, 13:21 <H> hand 3:18, 18:17 Hansen 7:12 head 10:14 Hearing 3:2, 3:10, 3:16, 13:20, 13:22, 14:4, 14:10, 14:16, 14:22, 15:19, 16:5, 16:15, 17:6, 18:11, 18:15 Heartland 6:14 hereby 15:18 hereunto 18:16 highlights 8:8, 13:12 HOLDIMAN 2:3, 3:6, 14:17, 16:19, 16:20 homeowner 9:3 homes 9:15, 11:22 hour 1:9 <I> idea 12:18 IDOT 10:1, 10:5 Illinois 1:2, 1:10, 2:12, 4:1, 4:13, 4:24, 15:7, 15:13, 15:14, 18:1, 18:9 improvements 12:22 Inc. 5:2, 7:13 Incorporated 3:23, 12:16 increased 10:22 indicated 5:21 integrated 7:17 intended 12:23 introduce 7:23 issue 13:18 item 3:21 <J> Jack 2:6, 16:23 John 2:10, 4:14, 4:17, 4:21, 6:21, 15:24, 17:3 JONES 2:6, 3:5, 16:10, 16:23, 16:24 JUSTIN 2:10 <K> Kendall 4:1, 4:3, 4:12, 15:7, 15:14 key 8:15 kind 9:10 knowing 12:22 KRAUPNER 2:5, 13:23, 16:17, 16:18 <L> land 9:2, 9:14, 10:24 large 6:5, 8:24, 9:5, 9:22 LASALLE 18:3 last 5:5, 5:5, 5:6, 6:6 late 5:6 law 4:22 left 7:3 letter 15:15 level 7:4, 7:9 License 18:24 Limited 15:8 limits 5:19 LINDBLOM 2:2, 3:1, 3:7, 3:10, 3:13, 3:15, 3:21, 4:9, 6:21, 7:1, 13:15, 13:20, 14:1, 14:4, 14:7, 14:9, 14:14, 14:19, 14:22, 15:1, 15:3, 16:5, 16:11, 16:15, 17:1, 17:2 line 9:7, 11:6, 12:19, 12:20, 12:21, 12:23, 13:8 little 6:22, 9:12, 9:16, 9:19,10:6 LLC 15:5,15:17 local 11:11 located 15:12 logical 6:9 look 5:7 looked 11:12 looking 5:11, 7:8, 10:2 lot 8:11, 8:22 lots 11:22 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 21 <M> M -1 15:8 M. 1:8, 18:6, 18:23 management 9:2 Manufacturing 15:9 matter 1:7, 15:24 MEETING 1:1, 1:6, 15:21, 16:8 meeting. 17:8 members 13:16 Mike 7:13, 7:15, 7:23, 8:1, 8:4 MILLER 2:7, 4:8 minor 11:11, 11:19 Motion 3:2, 13:21, 14:15, 14:20, 16:7, 16:13,17:2 Moved 3:4, 3:7, 13:23,14:1, 14:17, 14:19,16:9, 16:11 MS 2:4, 2:8, 3:4, 13:24, 14:18, 16:9, 16:17, 16:19, 16:21, 16:22, 16:23, 17:1 <N> name 4:21 Naperville 4:24 need 12:15 network 11:13 new 11:7 next 7:9 No. 18:24 none 3:10, 13:20, 14:4, 14:22, 16:5, 16:15 normally 8:20 north 5:20 notes 18:13 number 11:16 <O> oath 18:7 October 15:20 offices 4:23 Okay 6:24, 12:20 Once 12:18,13:18 one 12:11 open 6:5, 7:18, 8:16, 8:18, 8:23, 9:1, 9:21, 9:22,12:10 Opposed 3:13,14:7, 15:1 organized 12:16, 13:7,13:13 Originally 10:20 outcome 8:22 overview 13:12 owned 9:3, 9:15 <P> P.M. 1:9 packet 5:8 park 8:24, 12:3, 12:3, 12:6, 12:12, 12:15, 12:20, 13:5 parking 11:17 part 7:6, 9:20 particular 5:24, 6:1 Partners 15:5, 15:17 passes 17:3 PC 3:22, 14:16, 15:4 Penman 10:15, 10:15 percent 8:17 permitted 4:5 petition 16:3 petitioner 3:23, 5:3, 15:5, 15:16 Philipchuck 4:17, 4:20, 4:21, 6:24, 7:2, 15:24 picked 10:12 picking 11:8 piece 12:7 place 10:10 Plan 1:1, 4:19, 5:6, 5:9, 5:10, 5:13, 5:24, 6:4, 6:7, 6:12,6:15, 7:3, 7:3, 7:5, 7:6, 7:9, 7:10, 7:16, 7:17, 8:3, 8:8, 8:10, 8:11, 8:15, 9:19, 10:8, 11:15, 15:19,15:21 Planned 4:4, 10:15, 10:17 plans 10:1, 10:18, 12:14,12:19 plat 5:10 platting 13:10 please 3:3, 3:18, 16:16 point 13:21, 16:1 portion 17:7 postpone 16:7 preliminary 5:10, 7:5,7:6,7:10,7:17 presentation 13:14 previously 6:15 PROCEEDINGS 1:6, 17:5, 18:11, 18:15 process 5:14, 7:7, 13:10 product 6:1, 8:20 project 8:16 projects 9:9 property 4:10, 5:7, 5:16, 5:20, 6:8, 6:12, 8:18, 8:20, 9:7, 9:13, 10:11, 11:2, 11:4, 12:17, 13:8, 15:11 provide 10:9 provided 8:23, 11:13 public 3:2, 3:16, 13:16,13:22, 14:9, 14:15,15:18, 17:6, 18:11, 18:15 PUD 5:9, 6:17, 6:19, 7:7 pushed 11:1 put 8:22 <Q> questions 7:20 quite 7:4 <R> R -2 4:9 R -3 4:7 R -4 4:7, 4:8, 4:9 raise 3:18 rationale 7:16 read 15:4, 15:16 real 4:10, 15:11 Really 8:14, 12:23 reason 9:21 recall 5:4 receive 5:12 received 5:14 recommend 16:6 recommendations 6:16 record 8:4, 14:13, 15:4, 15:16 regarding 16:3 Remember 12:5 remembered 8:9 repeat 3:19 REPORT 1:6 reported 18:10 Reporter 18:8 request 10:22, 11:23 requested 11:18 requesting 4:1, 5:16, 15:7,15:18 residential 4:5 respecting 11:24 Response 3:9, 3:14, 13:19, 14:3,14:8, 14:21, 15:2, 16:4, 16:14 review 7:7, 8:11 rezoning 4:2, 6:17, 15:7 Ridge 4:12, 5:23, 11:8, 11:10,12:5 right -of -way 9:14, 9:17,10:21, 10:23, 11:9 Road 1:9, 6:14, 10:2, 10:12, 11:3, 11:13 roll 16:16 Route 4:11, 9:5, 9:12, 9:13, 9:16, 9:23, 15:13 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 22 <S> Sandra 2:4, 16:21 sanitary 6:11 saying 3:11, 14:5, 14:23 says 12:20, 18:7 scheduled 15:19 school 8:24,12:2, 12:11, 12:11, 12:21, 13:3, 13:5 Schoppe 7:13, 7:13, 7:23, 8:1, 8:4, 8:5, 8:5 Schultz 7:19 Second 3:5, 3:6, 13:24, 16:10 Seconded 3:8, 14:2, 14:18, 14:20, 16:12 served 11:4 Service 15:10 set 18:16 setback 9:5, 9:10, 9:23 seven -acre 12:6 sewer 6:11, 11:5, 11:6 Shorthand 18:8, 18:10, 18:13 side 11:2 Signed 15:24 signify 3:11, 14:5, 14:23 similar 5:11 single - family 6:2, 8:21 site 8:24, 12:4, 12:6, 12:12, 12:12, 13:3, 13:4, 13:4, 15:22 size 13:4 slight 6:1 Smith 7:19 south 4:11, 6:13, 9:20, 10:7 southeast 15:12 space 6:5, 7:18, 8:16, 8:18, 8:23, 9:1, 9:21, 9:22, 12:10 speaking 4:14 splits 13:9 spoken 9:18 ss 18:2 Staff 10:22, 11:16, 11:23, 12:13 stand 3:18 State 18:1, 18:8 stormwater 9:2 Street 4:24, 11:11, 11:11, 15:13 striking 12:23 subdivision 4:12, 5:23, 6:14 submitted 5:9 surrounding 11:12 sworn 3:20, 4:18, 8:2, 18:7 <T> talked 10:5, 12:2 terms 9:1, 11:5 testified 4:18, 8:2 Thanks 17:3 together 8:22 Tom 2:2,17:1 tonight 3:18 town 9:9, 9:20 townhome 8:19 townhomes 11:17, 11:18 traffic 11:24 transcript 18:13 transportation 10:18 TRAVIS 2:7 treated 6:19 true 18:12 turn 6:22 tw 13:9 two 8:22, 12:10 type 8:21 <U> <Y> ultimately 6:13 year 5:6, 5:6, 8:9 underlying 6:18 Yorkville 1:2, 1:10, Unit 4:4 2:12, 3:24, 4:2, 4:4, United 1:2, 2:11, 4:12, 4:19, 5:19, 8:3, 3:24, 4:2, 4:3, 5:19, 15:6, 15:8, 15:9 until 16:7 uses 4:5, 11:12 using 9:22 <V> visitor 11:17 VITOSH 1:8,18:6, 18:23 <W> Water 4:23, 6:11 Wednesday 15:20 Weisman - hughes 3:22, 5:2, 5:22, 7:12 West 4:23, 10:11, 10:12, 10:14, 11:2 whatever 12:15 WHEREOF 18:16 WHEREUPON 4:16, 7:24 will 5:8, 6:3, 7:15, 8:11, 10:9, 10:12, 11:4,12:12, 12:13, 12:13,13:9, 14:10, 15:16 Windett 4:12, 5:23, 11:8, 11:9, 12:5 wish 3:16, 13:17 wishes 16:2 within 7:18 WITNESS 18:16 Witnesses 3:20 work 13:6 worked 11:15 working 12:14 works 10:8 WYETH 2:10 15:4, 15:6, 15:8, 15:10, 15:14, 15:17 <Z> zoning 4:4, 6:18 < Dates > october 11, 2006 1:8, 1:8, 1:8 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030