Plan Commission Minutes 2006 05-24-06 Page 1 of 4
APPROVED 5/24/07
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
PLAN COMIMSSION
YORKVILLE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
WEDNESDAY, MAY 24, 2006
Chairman Tom Lindblom called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
j ROLL CALL
Members present: Charles Kraupner, Anne Lucietto, Bill Davis, Sandra Adams, Jack
Jones, Michael Crouch and Tom Lindblom. Brian Schillinger arrived at 7:30 p.m.
Member absent: Clarence Holdiman.
A quorum was established.
CITY STAFF AND GUESTS
Mayor Art Prochaska; City Attorney John Wyeth; Community Development Director
Travis Miller; Interim City Administrator John Crois; Lynn Dubajic, YEDC; consulting
engineer Bill Dunn, Engineering Enterprises, Inc.; Tony Scott, Kendall County Record;
Susan Munson, Legacy Real Estate; Rick Munson; Larry Cooper; Sally Cooper; Pam
Lkeinwachter; Jr. Collins; Don Ament; Ross Ament; Marian Brannel; Mike Haske;
Russell Ferguson; Tedd Lundquist, SEC Planning; Robert McCullough; William Garrett;
John Philipchuck, DBC &W Ltd., and Sue McCullough.
Anne Lucietto made a motion to open the public hearings. Sandra Adams seconded the
motion. The motion was unanimously approved by voice vote.
Chairman Lindblom swore in those who intended to speak at the hearing.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. PC 2005 -19 Woodlands, Inc. and Meadowbrook Homes, Inc., petitioners, have filed
an application with the city to annex and rezone.
See attached.
2. PC 2005 -52 Herb and Pam Kleinwachter and the Old Second National Bank
Trust 8051, petitioners, have filed an application with the city to annex and rezone. The
petitioners also are seeking a special use permit.
See attached.
3. PC 2006 -22 Richard Marker Associates, Inc., petitioners, have filed an application
with the city to annex and rezone.
See attached.
Lucietto made a motion to close the public hearings. Jack Jones seconded the motion.
The motion was unanimously approved by voice vote.
Page 2 of 4
NEW BUSINESS
1. PC 2005 -19 Woodlands Inc. and Meadowbrook Homes, Inc., petitioners, request
to annex and rezone.
The proposed plan shows two black lines indicating major collector roads the city would
like to extend. One goes from Route 71 north and the other is an extension of Greenbriar.
Lindblom asked what happens to the part of the black line that doesn't quite reach Route
71. Attorney Dan Kramer, representing the petitioner, said that since the petitioner
doesn't own that property, that area would be up to the city.
At this point, there are access routes to the property from the south. Kramer said that the
developer would put in a temporary egress to Route 71, so that there wouldn't be just one
entrance to the subdivision until other accesses are available.
Community Development Director Travis Miller said the black line north and south
represents Beecher Road and the east/west line is Greenbriar. Those road extensions were
recommendations of the city and are based on the comprehensive plan.
Brian Schillinger said he'd like to see another stub going to the south. Kramer said the
developer would consider it.
The land use in the proposed development is OK according to the comprehensive plan,
Miller said. And, because the density of 2.16 gross units per acre exceeds what is
allowable, the developer will have to follow the specified design guidelines.
The commission then took a vote on the annexation and zoning requests.
Lucietto made a motion to recommend annexation of PC 2005 -19. Jones seconded the
motion. The motion was unanimously approved by roll call vote. Charles Kraupner,
Lucietto, Bill Davis, Adams, Schillinger, Jones, Michael Crouch and Lindblom voted
yes.
Lucietto then made a motion to recommend zoning of PC 2005 -19 as requested. Jones
seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved in a roll call vote. Lucietto,
Davis, Adams, Schillinger, Jones, Crouch, Kraupner and Lindblom voted yes.
Discussing the concept plan presented, Lindblom said he has concerns about the long
dead -end corridor. Making a more general comment on the plan, Lindblom said the cul-
de -sacs through the plan are too long. Aladdin Ossir said the plan originally had shorter
cul -de -sacs, but the city staff didn't want to see so many egresses and ingresses onto the
proposed collector street.
Schillinger suggested a bridge be built across the creek rather than having the subdivision
divided by the waterway. Kramer said he's not sure it could be done financially. Also
there are likely conservation constraints that would prohibit it.
i
I
Page 3 of 4
2. PC 2005 -52 Herb and Pam HIeinwachter and Old Second National Bank Trust
8051, petition to annex and rezone and a request for a special use permit.
Kramer, representing the petitioners, said the annexation and zoning were previously
approved. The only matter up for consideration should be the special use permit, he said.
Day care centers need special use approval in the city, Kramer added.
Miller said that in the city's ordinances there are six findings that need to be considered
before approval. Those six findings are:
1. That the use is not unreasonable.
2. That it not be detrimental to surrounding properties.
3. That the establishment not impeded improvements of surrounding properties.
4. That necessary infrastructure improvements be made.
5. That adequate measures for ingress and egress are taken.
6. That the special use conforms to applicable regulations.
Looking at the findings one at a time, the commissioners found no concerns with any of
them.
Schillinger made a motion to recommend approval of a special use permit for PC 2005-
52 as requested. Lucietto seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved
by roll call vote. Davis, Adams, Schillinger, Jones, Crouch, Kraupner, Lucietto and
Lindblom voted yes.
3. PC 2006 -22 Richard Marker Associates, Inc., petitioners, application to annex
and rezone.
Lindblom said the commission and city council met several months ago to discuss the
southern portion to the city and the extended region. It was decided not to have
commercial areas lined up and down Route 47.
However, because the preliminary plan wasn't included with the information provided,
Lindblom suggested tabling the request until the plan is provided. Attorney John
Philipchuck, representing the petitioners, agreed to table. He said the commission needs
the plan to make an informed decision.
Lucietto made a motion to table PC 2006 -22. Jones seconded the motion. The motion was
unanimously approved by voice vote.
4. PC 2005 -33 Chally Farms — Preliminary Plan
Rich Guerard said some changes have been made since the concept plan was presented.
One road was realigned to align with the subdivision to the north.
The detention area was moved to a natural greenway and a trail system will now run
though that area. There also are a few less lots and more open space in the plan.
Page 4 of 4
Miller said staff and EEI have few technical items that need to be finished, but approval
of the plan is recommended subject to staff comments.
Crouch asked if the archeological issues that arose with the plan was first presented have
been resolved. Guerard said the site is still being reviewed and if anything is found, an
archeological dig will be conducted before any building could begin.
Lucietto made a motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plan for PC 2005 -33
subject to staff comments. Jones seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously
approved by roll call vote. Adams, Schillinger, Jones, Crouch, Kraupner, Lucietto, Davis
and Lindblom voted yes.
5. PC 2006 -17 Grande Reserve Unit 18 — Final Plat
6. PC 2006 -18 Grande Reserve Unit 19 — Final Plat
7. PC 2006 -19 Grande Reserve Unit 20 — Final Plat
Consulting Engineer Bill Dunn from EEI said all of the final plats are OK. Miller also
said the city staff had no additional comments on the final plats.
Lucietto made a motion to recommend final plat approval for PC 2006 -17 subject to staff
comments. Jones seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by roll
call vote. Schillinger, Jones, Crouch, Kraupner, Lucietto, Davis, Adams and Lindblom
voted yes.
Lucietto then made a motion to recommend final plat approval for PC 2006 -18 subject to
staff comments. Crouch seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by
roll call vote. Jones, Crouch, Kraupner, Lucietto, Davis, Adams, - Schillinger and
Lindblom voted yes.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Miller said there are nine or ten items for discussion in June. Of those, five are final plats,
three are public hearings and one is a concept plan presentation.
Lindblom said he'd rather have two short meetings in June than one long one.
Schillinger said he figures on having two meetings a month for the next several months
because of the caseload.
Also, Crouch said a lot of people who come to the public hearings leave before the plan
commission discusses the issue. He'd like to see the commission have its discussion after
the public hearing at times when there's a big crowd at the public hearing.
The meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. Lucietto made the motion to close the meeting. Jones
seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by voice vote.
Minutes respectfully submitted by Dina Gipe
I
PLAN COMMISSION MEETING
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS
REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had at the meeting
of the above - entitled matter transribed by
CHRISTINE M. VITOSH, C.S.R., on May 24, 2006, at
the hour of 7:00 p.m., at 800 Game Farm Road, in
the City of Yorkville, Illinois.
REPO • COURT
reporting service
1212 South Naper Boulevard • Suite 119 -185 • Naperville, IL 60540 • 630 - 983 -0030 • Fax 630 - 299 -5153
www.depocourt.com
2
1 P R E S E N T:
2 MR. TOM LINDBLOM, Chairman;
3 MS. SANDRA ADAMS;
4 MS. ANNE LUCIETTO;
5 MR. BILL DAVIS;
6 MR. CHARLES KRAUPNER;
7 MR. MICHAEL CROUCH;
8 MR. BRIAN SCHILLINGER;
9 MR. JACK JONES;
10 MR. TRAVIS MILLER;
11 MS. DINA GIPE.
12 A P P E A R A N C E S:
13 BY: MR. JOHN JUSTIN WYETH,
appeared on behalf o_f the United
14 City of Yorkville, Illinois.
15
16 - - - - -
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
3
1 (Witnesses sworn)
2 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: I would
3 entertain a motion then to go to public hearing.
4 MS. LUCIETTO: So moved.
5 MS. ADAMS: Second.
6 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Been moved and
7 seconded to go to public hearing. Is there any
8 discussion on the motion?
9 (No Response)
10 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Hearing none,
11 those in favor signify by saying aye.
12 (A Chorus of Ayes)
13 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Opposed?
14 (No Response)
15 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Motion passes.
16 Okay. At this time I would like to ask anybody
17 that thinks they are going to have anything to
18 say during all three public hearings to please
19 stand and raise your right hand.
20 (Witnesses sworn)
21 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Thank you. The
22 first item on the agenda is PC 2005 -19,
23 Woodlands, Incorporated, and Meadowbrook Homes,
24 Incorporated, petitioners, have filed an
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
4
1 application with the United City of Yorkville,
2 Kendall County, Illinois, requesting annexation
3 to the United City of Yorkville and rezoning from
4 Kendall County A -1 to United City of Yorkville
5 containing R -2 One- Family Residence District.
6 The real property consists of
7 approximately 161 and a half acres, one - quarter
8 mile west of the intersection of Route 71 and
9 Route 47 and the north side of Route 71 in
10 Kendall County, Illinois.
11 Dan Kramer is speaking for the
12 petitioner?
13 WHEREUPON:
14 DANIEL J. KRAMER,
15 testified before the Yorkville Plan Commission as
16 follows:
17 MR. KRAMER: For the record, my name
18 is Dan Kramer. I am an attorney licensed to
19 practice law in the State of Illinois. My
20 address is 1107A South Bridge Street, Yorkville,
21 Illinois, 60560, and I represent the petitioners.
22 The main two representatives of the owner and the
23 developing entity of this property are both here
24 tonight, Profur Nassar (phonetic) on the far
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
5
1 right and Aladdin Nassar, who are the owners.
2 Again, their firm both owns it, will develop it,
3 and build the homes in this area.
4 The property, as most of you
5 would know from living in the town for some time,
6 is the old Harris farm, and in honor of that they
7 are naming the whole development Harris Woods.
8 It's contiguous to the City of
9 Yorkville on the its northern boundary and it's a
10 natural outgrowth to the United City of
11 Yorkville.
12 We base this on a number of
13 meetings and I have had some myself with staff,
14 they encouraged us to work with a fairly large
15 group in the southwest quadrant of the City that
16 would extend municipal utility services for that
17 property for the future growth in the
18 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan shows
19 it as a suburban residential district, which is
20 what we are doing. It is all single- family lots.
21 And as you can see from the way
22 it is black showing on our concept plan, they
23 have some very big challenges as owners that they
24 would prefer not to encounter, but, again,
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
i
6
1 working with the City planning staff, they are
2 willing to assume.
3 The two big black areas are
4 major collectors that the City would like to see
5 extended, one being Greenbriar Road, and then it
6 would become a major, and everything out there is
7 on an east -west, north - south, kind of skewed
8 angle, so you almost need a compass, but the City
9 also wanted to see another major connector come
10 up to 71 and generally work to the north on the
11 property.
12 So as we're going through the
13 annexation process with staff, those will be some
14 of the challenges; in other words, providing
15 these oversized collectors that wouldn't be
16 generated by a development normally, and then an
17 orderly extension of sewer and water.
18 We have tried to follow again
19 the Comp Plan in terms of widening it out. Lot
20 size was predominantly 12,000. We have tried to
21 cluster some 10,000 or better square foot lots
22 near the open areas and have some inner spurs.
23 Again, we've gone with the
24 curvilinear -type as opposed to a grid
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
7
1 development, so you'll see that there is a lot of
2 pie- shaped lots and L's and cul -de -sacs that will
3 be very large lots that will be in excess of
4 15,000 square feet.
5 So we are asking the Plan
6 Commission tonight to give a favorable
7 recommendation to the City Council for annexation
8 of this property as a natural outgrowth of the
9 City boundaries in conformance with the Comp
10 Plan.
11 We are asking for a positive
12 recommendation as to all single- family, which was
13 called again under the suburban zoning in the
14 Comp Plan, and then we have a common concept, and
15 I realize this is your first shot at it. We are
16 happy to entertain those, entertain any questions
17 from the Plan Commission or the public may have.
18 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Thank
19 you, Dan. At this time I would entertain any
20 questions or concerns from the audience for Dan.
21 Yes, sir.
�I
22 WHEREUPON:
23 RON GLUCK,
24 testified before the Yorkville Plan Commission as
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
8
1 follows:
2 MR. GLUCK: My name is Ron Gluck
3 (phonetic) here in Yorkville. Question is this:
4 From the information we have received to this
5 point, the north -south connector rendering has
6 not been completed as yet and can be changed at
7 any time.
8 What will remain to the west on
9 the conservation use?
10 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: What remains to
11 the west?
12 MR. GLUCK: It will still all be
13 conservation? Right now it's shown somewhere in
14 the middle of the Comp Plan.
15 MR. KRAMER: This will be Aladdin
16 Nassar, he has been sworn in.
17 WHEREUPON:
18 ALADDIN NASSAR,
19 testified before the Yorkville Plan Commission as
20 follows:
21 MR. NASSAR: I am a partner in the
22 development. We actually got the geometry to
23 look at the ingress and egress points of both
24 major collectors directly from EDI, John
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
9
1 Whitehouse, from the City's consulting engineer,
2 emailed that to us and asked us to stay as close
3 to that geometry, so that's -- our response to
4 the question.
5 One of the other challenges is
6 to have a wetland area that we are protecting,
7 we're trying to infringe on a quarter of an acre
8 or less so we don't have to go to for a
9 nationwide permit. We're trying to preserve the
10 wetland as much as we can, so the placement of
11 the street connected to the wetland actually
12 carries a lighter intrusion, but we are able to
13 work around to a favorable end. So the City
14 wants --
15 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Does that seem
16 to answer your question?
17 MR. GLUCK: Yes. Thank you very
18 much.
19 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Oak. Thank you.
20 Other questions? Yes, sir.
21 WHEREUPON:
22 WILLIAM GARRETT,
23 testified before the Yorkville Plan Commission as
24 follows,
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
10
1 MR. GARRETT: William Garrett. I am
2 at 10645 Route 71. My problem is is the fact
3 that Joe Harris, that you guys were saying were
4 letting him there and they have the creek there,
5 they have two parks, if you can imagine that off
6 of 71, consider where you are at. I've got
7 almost an acre and about a quarter of an acre. I
8 think Joe is here and I am the house here. Where
9 is the actual creek and tree line?
10 UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: These would
11 be the trees. There is a stand of trees right
12 over here.
13 MR. GARRETT: There is parks on this
14 side and a park on this side. My question is if
15 you guys would be willing to put a berm on my
16 land to separate it from the house -- the house
17 that comes to my land. Would this be it back
18 there that has a tree farm back there?
19 UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: I'm not
20 exactly sure.
21 MR. GARRETT: (inaudible), I have a
22 tree line and then I have (inaudible). Would you
23 guys be willing to put a berm on that?
24 UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: We would have
I
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
11
1 to go with the neighbors --
2 MR. GARRETT: Yeah, I understand
3 that, (inaudible). Do you guys have any
4 detention ponds coming in there?
5 UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: The retention
6 ponds are these light green areas, and because of
7 the topography of the site we kind of put them
8 back this way, which will hide them so there
9 won't be any flooding, you know, the engineer
10 touched on that. The water is here, in that
11 corner, (inaudible).
12 MR. GARRETT: (inaudible).
13 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Thank
14 you. Other questions or concerns on this
15 petition?
16 (No response)
17 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. We will
18 move on to the second public hearing, PC 2005 -52,
19 Herb and Cam -- Pam Kleinwachter and Old Second
20 National Bank Trust 8051, petitioners, have
21 proposed to annex to the United City of Yorkville
22 and rezone from Kendall County A -1 Agricultural
23 to United City of Yorkville B -3 Service Business
24 District and R -2 One- Family Residence District,
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
12
1 and for hearing as to the annexation agreement of
2 petitioner. In addition, the petitioners request
3 a special use day care center permitted by
4 Section 10 -7D -2.
5 The real property consists of
6 approximately 9.81 acres located on Route 47,
7 south of Legion Road and north of the River Road,
8 United -- Kendall Township, Kendall County,
9 Illinois.
10 Dan, do you have that?
11 MR. KRAMER: For the record, again,
12 Dan Kramer, 1107A South Bridge Street, Yorkville,
13 Illinois, 60560. I am an attorney licensed to
14 practice law in the State of Illinois and I do
15 represent the petitioners, Pam and Herb
16 Kleinwachter, and Pam.is at the very back of my
17 right tonight if you have any questions for she.
18 You folks probably remember,
19 you saw this about three months ago and you were
20 very gracious, you gave us a positive
21 recommendation for both the annexation and the
22 zoning to the City Council, although you had the
23 whole thing blurred in the application and the
24 public notice.
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
13
1 Really the only thing we are
2 looking for tonight when we go to your actual
3 working session is a recommendation to the City
4 Council for a special use for day care. Day care
5 does require a special use granted on the basis
6 of zoning B -3, which you have already recommended
7 to the City Council. The only change in the
8 drawing of the 9.81 acres that you folks have
9 seen are staff incurred recommendations on the
10 one hand and that was they wanted us to provide
11 the availability for street connection to the
12 north and south in case there was ever
13 development. The street that for the time being
14 we call Street B, but we-will be a little bit
15 more creative when we come back with final plat,
16 with the drive that's behind the USDA park and
17 agricultural office up there, so there will be a
18 public street there.
19 The other thing that we did,
20 it's very unlikely that there will ultimately
21 need to be a connection to the north, that is
22 shown as residential on the Comp Plan and has
23 large windows of access, both at Legion Road and
24 up 47, the property owner has a very minor
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
14
1 parcel. We flipped the day care there, which was
2 originally going to be on the southern lot, we
3 put it on the northern lot, and Pam believes
4 there is a very big need for the service in the
5 community and frankly expanded the building, so
6 those are the only two changes in it.
7 We will be happy again to
8 answer any questions for the Plan Commission,
9 staff, or the public. The only thing we are
10 asking tonight, again, that's different is the
11 special use.
12 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Dan, just for
13 clarification, what I received was a preliminary
14 land staking plan and the smaller preliminary
15 development plan, and this one shows the day care
16 center in the center of the piece. Is that the
17 same piece?
18 MR. KRAMER: No, no. This -- those
19 must have been older reduced versions. The
20 larger version should be this putting the day
21 care to the north.
22 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: And it does not
23 show -- this does not show the access road to the
24 south.
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
15
1 MR. KRAMER: Right. And, again, we
2 knew staff wanted both points, so that's why we
3 had it modified.
4 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Are there
5 questions or concerns from the audience on this
6 petition?
No response)
7 (
P
8 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Hearing
9 none then, we will move on to -- sure. Item 3 on
10 our agenda is PC 2006 -22. This is Richard Marker
11 Associates, Incorporated, petitioners, have filed
12 an application with the United City of Yorkville,
13 Kendall County, Illinois, requesting annexation
14 to the United City of Yorkville and rezoning from
15 Kendall County A -1 to United City of Yorkville
16 Planned Unit Development containing R -2
17 One - Family Residence District and B -3 Service
18 Business District.
19 The real property consists of
20 approximately 514 acres east of Route 47 and
21 south of Ament Road in Kendall County, Illinois.
22 John?
23 WHEREUPON:
24 JOHN PHILIPCHUCK,
' I
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
16
1 testified before the Yorkville Plan Commission as
2 follows:
3 MR. PHILIPCHUCK: Good evening, John
4 Philipchuck. I am an attorney with the law firm
5 of Dommermuth, Brestal, Cobine & West with
I
6 offices at 123 Water Street, Naperville,
7 Illinois.
8 With me this evening is Clint
9 Marker, with Marker & Associates, Pete Huinker,
10 Smith Engineering, who is our civil engineer in
11 this case.
12 As the Staff so noted in the
13 analysis, the property is located along Route 47
14 south of Ament Road, both sides of Penman Road at
15 this location, and then Wheeler Road, and on the
16 plat will be constructed as part of the ongoing
17 plan of continuing that road.
18 Plan Commission will recall we
19 were before you a few months ago with a concept
20 plan for the property. Since that time we had an
21 opportunity to go through, get comments from Plan
22 Commission, from the City Council. We have made
i
23 revisions and we are now here before you with the
24 preliminary plan and plat.
I
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
17
1 We are looking for a portion of
2 the property zoned R -2 and a portion of this
3 property to be zoned B -3. It will all be subject
4 to the Planned Unit Development. The R -2 portion
5 is 196.8 acres and we have 86.2 acres of
6 commercial property. The city will be
7 concentrating its commercial property along Route
8 47.
9 In the earlier concept plan we
10 had some residential B -3 in here and there was
11 concern about that, the commercial areas along
12 Wheeler Road going up into a larger commercial
13 node on Ament and 347, so to eliminate that
14 concern we will have cross - access through the
15 commercial portion of this property and the --
16 also then also service delivery to expose the
17 clubhouse facility that will have commercial
18 entites located within, we'll get from this
19 location where folks would have to cross the
20 street to get to the park area, so that now
21 access may be had to the park site and the
22 clubhouse without crossing the street and without
23 exposure to any commercial uses along Route 47.
24 You will recall that we have a
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
18
1 school site located on the property at Penman and
2 constructed via the road. We have had meetings
3 with Dr. Engler and the Park Board. We have
4 talked about the site. There are some trade -offs
5 with the park site, that exposure to the
6 Montalbano development, and concentrate this site
7 that will ultimately have a school on that
8 particular parcel, and some of the other area can
9 be used for recreational purposes.
10 As you recall the plan provided
11 for the various neighborhood path linkages so
12 that there is interconnections between all the
13 neighborhoods with an interior pathway system.
14 These will be constructed by the developer and
15 will be owned and maintained by the homeowner's
16 association, so the park department and the city
17 won't have responsiblity for that.
18 The Plan Commission had
19 suggested, and so had the City Council, that
20 perhaps some equal access or sharing happen, so
21 we would have an emergency access, we would have
22 construction or building of a street between
23 two of those areas --
24 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Excuse me. Just
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
19
1 a second. I hope I am not confusing things. The
2 reason before us tonight as I understand it was
3 the annexation and zoning. We have not seen this
4 map. All we had is the zoning -- the request of
5 the developer to become business versus
6 residential.
7 MR. MILLER: Right. The preliminary
8 plan is before the plan department tomorrow --
9 MR. PHILIPCHUCK: (inaudible), what
10 we had on here, obviously it would come back to
11 you, but the compliment to zoning, you see where
12 the B -2 parcels and B -3 parcels are located, the
13 small, limited commercial that we had on this
14 plan, on the Comp Plan, on your zoning plat,
15 those would be limited B -3, which would limit the
16 types of uses, that would be on the smaller
17 parcels because they are adjacent to residential
18 at the back of the B -3, and have R -2 at the
19 remaining portion of the property.
20 So with that, we have looked at
21 the (inaudible), working with some adjacent
22 property owners to get an annexation corridor to
23 the north, as well as the service corridor so
24 that we can interconnect with the different
i
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
20
1 sanitary facilities located here, and so the
2 development will pay the price for the pump
3 station and it will pay the price for the
4 additional storage capacity involved to monitor
5 certain areas.
6 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Just for
7 clarification for people in the audience, the
8 question for us tonight is to -- a recommendation
9 to the City Council for annexation and zoning.
10 It is not for the preliminary plan which you see
11 up on the board, but that does give you an idea
12 of that portion of the property that is being
13 asked to be zoned business versus the
14 residential.
15 It will be coming back to us
16 then did you say the 14th, and we will have had a
17 chance to have seen what you guys have right now
18 and we'll also have had a chance to review it.
19 With that being said, are there
20 questions or concerns from the audience right now
21 related to the zoning and annexation?
22 (No Response)
23 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. I would
24 just make a comment that assuming this appears on
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
21
1 the agenda for the 14th, you are certainly
2 welcome to come sit in on any discussions on
3 that.
4 Is there any further questions
5 or concerns for the public hearing?
6 (No Response)
7 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Hearing
8 none then, I would entertain a motion to close
9 the public hearing.
10 MS. LUCIETTO: So moved.
11 MR. JONES: Second.
12 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: So moved and
13 seconded. Is there further discussion on the
14 motion?
15 (No Response)
16 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Hearing none,
17 those in favor signify by saying aye.
18 (A Chorus of Ayes)
19 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Opposed?
20 (No Response)
21 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Motion passes.
22 (Which were all the
23 proceedings had in
24 the public hearing
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
22
1 portion of the
2 meeting.)
3 --- 000 - --
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
23
1 STATE OF ILLINOIS )
ss:
2 COUNTY OF LASALLE )
3
4 CHRISTINE M. VITOSH, being first duly
5 sworn, on oath says that she is a Certified
6 Shorthand Reporter doing business in the State of
7 Illinois;
8 That she transcribed the proceedings
9 from the audio tape taken at the foregoing
10 meeting;
11 And that the foregoing is a true and
12 correct transcript of the audio tape heard as
13 aforesaid and contains all the proceedings had at
14 the said meeting.
15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set
16 my ha this _ day of
17 2007.
18
19
20 ,
21
CHRISTIN M. VITOSH C.S.R.
22 CSR License No. 084 - 002883
23
24
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
24
I
--- oOo - -- 22:3 additional 20:4 audio 23:11, 23:14 13:4, 14:1, 14:15,
084 - 002883 23:25 address 4:20 availability 13:11 14:21
10,000 6:21, 6:21 adjacent 19:17, aye 3:11, 21:17 carries 9:12
10 -713-2 12:4 19:21 Ayes 3:12, 21:18 case 13:12, 16:11
10645 10:2 aforesaid 23:15 center 12:3, 14:16,
1107A 4:20, 12:12 agenda 3:22, 15:10, 14:16
12,000 6:20, 6:20 21:1 < B > certain 20:5
123 16:6 ago 12:19, 16:19 B -2 19:12 certainly 21:1
14th 20:16, 21:1 agreement 12:1 B -3 11:23, 13:6, Certified 23:7
15,000 7:4, 7:4 Agricultural 11:22, 15:17, 17:3, 17:10, CHAIRMAN 2:2,3:2,
1614:7 13:17 19:12, 19:15, 19:18 3:6, 3:10, 3:13, 3:15,
196.8 17:5 ALADDIN 5:1, 8:15, back 10:17, 10:18, 3:21, 7:18, 8:10,
2005 -1 3:22 8:18 11:8, 12:16, 13:15, 9:15, 9:19, 11:13,
2005 -5 11:18 almost 6:8, 10:7 19:10, 19:18, 20:15 11:17, 14:12, 14:22,
2006 -22 15:10 already 13:6 Bank 11:20 15:4, 15:8, 18:24,
2007. 23:19 although 12:22 base 5:12 20:6, 20:23, 21:7,
3 15:9 Ament 15:21, 16:14, basis 13:5 21:12, 21:16, 21:19,
34 17:13 17:13 become 6:6, 19:5 21:21
4 12:6, 13:24 analysis 16:13 behalf 2:14 challenges 5:23,
47 4:9, 15:20, 16:13, angle 6:8 behind 13:16 6:14, 9:5
17:8, 17:23 ANNE 2:4 believes 14:3 chance 20:17, 20:18
514 15:20 annex 11:21 berm 10:15, 10:23 change 13:7
6056 4:21 annexation 4:2, better 6:21 changed 8:6
60560 12:13 6:13, 7:7, 12:1, big 5:23, 6:3, 14:4 changes 14:6
7 10:6 12:21, 15:13, 19:3, BILL 2:5 CHARLES 2:6
714:8, 4:9, 6:10, 19:22, 20:9, 20:21 bit 13:14 Chorus 3:12, 21:18
10:2 answer 9:16, 14:8 black 5:22, 6:3 - CHRISTINE 1:8,
7:00 1:9, 1:9 anybody 3:16 blurred 12:23 23:6, 23:24
800 1:9 appeared 2:14 Board 18:3, 20:11 City 1:2,1:10, 2:15,
805 11:20 appears 20:24 boundaries 7:9 4:1, 4:3, 4:4, 5:8,
86.2 17:5 application 4:1, boundary 5:9 5:10, 5:15, 6:1, 6:4,
9.81 12:6, 13:8 12:23, 15:12 Brestal 16:5 6:8, 7:7, 7:9, 9:1,
approximately 4:7, BRIAN 2:8 9:13, 11:21, 11:23,
12:6, 15:20 Bridge 4:20, 12:12 12:22, 13:3, 13:7,
<A> area 5:3, 9:6, 17:20, build 5:3 15:12, 15:14, 15:15,
A -1 4:4, 11:22, 15:15 18:8 building 14:5, 18:22 16:22, 17:6, 18:16,
able 9:12 areas 6:3, 6:22, 11:6, Business 11:23, 18:19, 20:9
above- entitled 1:7 17:11, 18:23, 20:5 15:18, 19:5, 20:13, civil 16:10
access 13:23, 14:23, around 9:13 23:8 clarification 14:13,
17:21, 18:20, 18:21 Associates 15:11, 20:7
acre 9:7, 10:7, 10:7 16:9 Clint 16:8
acres 4:7, 12:6, association 18:16 < C > close 9:2, 21:8
13:8, 15:20, 17:5, assume 6:2 C.S.R. 1:8, 23:24 clubhouse 17:17,
17:5 assuming 20:24 call 13:14 17:22
actual 10:9, 13:2 attorney 4:18, 12:13, called 7:13 cluster 6:21
actually 8:22, 9:11 16:4 Cam 11:19 Cobine 16:5
ADAMS 2:3, 3:5 audience 7:20, 15:5, capacity 20:4 collectors 6:4, 6:15,
addition 12:2 20:7, 20:20 care 12:3, 13:4, 8:24
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
25
comes 10:17 15:16 different 14:10, extend 5:16
coming 11:4,20:15 contains 23:15 19:24 extended 6:5
comment 20:24 contiguous 5:8 DINA 2:11 extension 6:17
comments 16:21 continuing 16:17 directly 8:24
commercial 17:6, corner 11:11 discussion 3:8,
17:7,17:11, 17:12, correct 23:14 21:13 < F >
17:15, 17:17, 17:23, corridor 19:22, discussions 21:2 facilities 20:1
19:13 19:23 District 4:5, 5:19, facility 17:17
Commission 1:1, Council 7:7,12:22, 11:24,11:24, 15:17, fact 10:2
4:15, 7:6, 7:17, 7:24, 13:4, 13:7, 16:22, 15:18 fairly 5:14
8:19, 9:23, 14:8, 18:19, 20:9 doing 5:20, 23:8 far 4:24
16:1, 16:18, 16:22, COUNTY4:2, 4:4, Dommermuth 16:5 Farm 1:9, 5:6, 10:18
18:18 4:10, 11:22, 12:8, drawing 13:8 favor 3:11, 21:17
common 7:14 15:13, 15:15,15:21, drive 13:16 favorable 7:6, 9:13
community 14:5 23:3 duly 23:6 feet 7:4
Comp 6:19, 7:9, creative 13:15 during 3:18 few 16:19
7:14, 8:14,13:22, creek 10:4, 10:9 filed 3:24,15:11
19:14 cross 17:19 final 13:15
compass 6:8 cross - access 17:14 < E > firm 5:2, 16:4
completed 8:6 crossing 17:22 earlier 17:9 first 3:22, 7:15, 23:6
compliment 19:11 CROUCH 2:7 east 15:20 flipped 14:1
Comprehensive CSR 23:25 east -west 6:7 flooding 11:9
5:18, 5:18 cul -de -sacs 7:2 EDI 8:24 folks 12:18,13:8,
concentrate 18:6 curvilinear -type egress 8:23 17:19
concentrating 17:7 6:24 eliminate 17:13 follow 6:18
concept 5:22, 7:14, emailed 9:2 follows 4:16, 8:1,
16:19,17:9 emergency 18:21 8:20, 9:24, 16:2
concern 17:11, < D > encounter 5:24 foot 6:21
17:14 Dan 4:11, 4:18, 7:19, encouraged 5:14 foregoing 23:11,
concerns 7:20, 7:20, 12:10,12:12, end 9:13 23:13
11:14,15:5, 20:20, 14:12 engineer 9:1, 11:9, frankly 14:5
21:5 DANIEL 4:14 16:10 future 5:17
conformance 7:9 DAVIS 2:5 Engineering 16:10
confusing 19:1 Day 12:3, 13:4, 13:4, Engler 18:3
connected 9:11 14:1, 14:15,14:20, entertain 3:3, 7:16, < G >
connection 13:11, 23:18 7:16, 7:19, 21:8 Game 1:9
13:21 delivery 17:16 entites 17:18 GARRETT 9:22,
connector 6:9, 8:5 department 18:16, entity 4:23 10:1, 10:1, 10:13,
conservation 8:9, 19:8 equal 18:20 10:21, 11:2, 11:12
8:13 detention 11:4 evening 16:3, 16:8 gave 12:20
consider 10:6 develop 5:2 everything 6:6 generally 6:10
consists 4:6, 12:5, developer 18:14, exactly 10:20 generated 6:16
15:19 19:5 excess 7:3 geometry 8:22, 9:3
constructed 16:16, developing 4:23 Excuse 18:24 GIPE 2:11
18:2, 18:14 Development 5:7, expanded 14:5 give 7:6, 20:11
construction 18:22 6:16, 7:1, 8:22, expose 17:16 GLUCK 7:23, 8:2,
consulting 9:1 13:13, 14:15, 15:16, exposure 17:23, 8:2, 8:12, 9:17
containing 4:5, 17:4, 18:6, 20:2 18:5 gracious 12:20
i
Depo Count Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
26
granted 13:5 Incorporated 3:23, LASALLE 23:3 16:9
green 11:6 3:24, 15:11 law 4:19, 12:14, 16:4 matter 1:7
Greenbriar 6:5 incurred 13:9 Legion 12:7, 13:23 Meadowbrook 3:23
grid 6:24 information 8:4 less 9:8 MEETING 1:1, 1:6,
group 5:15 infringe 9:7 letting 10:4 23:12, 23:16
growth 5:17 ingress 8:23 License 23:25 meeting. 22:2
guys 10:3, 10:15, inner 6:22 licensed 4:18, 12:13 meetings 5:13,18:2
10:23, 11:3, 20:17 interconnect 19:24 light 11:6 MICHAEL 2:7
interconnections lighter 9:12 middle 8:14
18:12 limit 19:15 mile 4:8
< H > interior 18:13 limited 19:13,19:15 MILLER 2:10,19:7
half 4:7 intersection 4:8 LINDBLOM 2:2, 3:2, minor 13:24
hand 3:19, 13:10, intrusion 9:12 3:6, 3:10, 3:13, 3:15, modified 15:3
23:18 involved 20:4 3:21, 7:18, 8:10, monitor 20:4
happen 18:20 Item 3:22, 15:9 9:15, 9:19, 11:13, Montalbano 18:6
happy 7:16, 14:7 11:17, 14:12, 14:22, months 12:19, 16:19
Harris 5:6, 5:7, 10:3 15:4, 15:8, 18:24, Motion 3:3, 3:8,
heard 23:14 < J > 20:6, 20:23, 21:7, 3:15, 21:8, 21:14,
Hearing 3:3, 3:7, J. 4:14 21:12, 21:16, 21:19, 21:21
3:10, 11:18, 12:1, JACK 2:9 21:21 move 11:18, 15:9
15:8,21:5, 21:7, Joe 10:3, line 10:9,10:22 moved 3:4, 3:6,
21:9,21:16, 21:24 John 2:13, 8:24, linkages 18:11 21:10, 21:12
hearings 3:18 15:22, 15:24, 16:3 little 13:14 MS 2:3, 2:4, 2:11,
Herb 11:19, 12:15 JONES 2:9, 21:11 living 5:5 3:4, 3:5,21:10
hereunto 23:17 JUSTIN 2:13 located 12:6, 16:13, municipal 5:16
hide 11:8 17:18, 18:1, 19:12, myself 5:13
homeowner 18:15 20:1
Homes 3:23, 5:3 < K > location 16:15,
honor 5:6 Kendall 4:2, 4:4, 17:19 < N >
hope 19:1 4:10, 11:22, 12:8, look 8:23 name 4:17, 8:2
hour 1:9 12:8, 15:13, 15:15, looked 19:20 naming 5:7
house 10:8,10:16, 15:21 looking 13:2, 17:1 Naperville 16:6
10:16 kind 6:7, 11:7 Lot 6:19, 7:1, 14:2, NASSAR 4:24, 5:1,
Huinker 16:9 Kleinwachter 11:19, 14:3 8:16, 8:18, 8:21
12:16 lots 5:20, 6:21, 7:2, National 11:20
KRAMER 4:11, 4:14, 7:3 nationwide 9:9
< I > 4:17, 4:18, 8:15, LUCIETTO 2:4, 3:4, natural 5:10, 7:8
idea 20:11 12:11, 12:12,14:18, 21:10 near 6:22
Illinois 1:2, 1:10, 15:1 need 6:8, 13:21,
2:15, 4:2, 4:10, 4:19, KRAUPNER 2:6 14:4
4:21, 12:9, 12:13, < M > neighborhood 18:11
12:14, 15:13, 15:21, M. 1:8, 23:6, 23:24 neighborhoods
16:7, 23:1, 23:9 < L> main 4:22 18:13
imagine 10:5 land 10:16,10:17, maintained 18:15 neighbors 11:1
in. 8:16 14:14 major 6:4, 6:6, 6:9, No. 14:18, 23:25
inaudible 10:21, large 5:14, 7:3, 8:24 node 17:13
10:22,11:3, 11:11, 13:23 map 19:4 none 3:10, 15:9,
11:12, 19:9, 19:21 larger 14:20, 17:12 Marker 15:10, 16:9, 21:8, 21:16
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
27
normally 6:16 parcel 14:1, 18:8 16:24, 19:14 quarter 9:7, 10:7
north 4:9, 6:10, 12:7, parcels 19:12, please 3:18 Question 8:3, 9:4,
13:12, 13:21, 14:21, 19:12, 19:17 poin 8:5 9:16, 10:14, 20:8
19:23 Park 10:14, 13:16, points 8:23, 15:2 questions 7:16,
north -south 6:7, 8:5 17:20, 17:21, 18:3, ponds 11:4, 11:6 7:20, 9:20, 11:14,
northern 5:9, 14:3 18:5, 18:16 portion 17:1, 17:2, 12:17, 14:8, 15:5,
noted 16:12 parks 10:5, 10:13 17:4, 17:15, 19:19, 20:20, 21:4
notice 12:24 part 16:16 20:12, 22:1
number 5:12 particular 18:8 positive 7:11, 12:20
partner 8:21 practice 4:19, 12:14 < R >
passes 3:15, 21:21 predominantly 6:20 R -2 4:5, 11:24,
< O > path 18:11 prefer 5:24 15:16, 17:2, 17:4,
Oak 9:19 pathway 18:13 preliminary 14:13, 19:18
oath 23:7 pay 20:2, 20:3 14:14, 16:24, 19:7, raise 3:19
obviously 19:10 PC 3:22, 11:18, 20:10 real 4:6, 12:5, 15:19
office 13:17 15:10 preserve 9:9 realize 7:15
offices 16:6 Penman 16:14,18:1 price 20:2, 20:3 Really 13:1
Okay 3:16, 7:18, people 20:7 probably 12:18 reason 19:2
11:13, 11:17, 15:4, perhaps 18:20 problem 10:2 recall 16:18, 17:24,
15:8, 20:6, 20:23, permit 9:9 PROCEEDINGS 1:6, 18:10
21:7 permitted 12:3 21:23, 23:10, 23:15 received 8:4,14:13
Old 5:6, 11:19 Pete 16:9 process 6:13 recommendation
older 14:19 petition 11:15, 15:6 Profur 4:24 7:7, 7:12, 12:21,
One 6:5, 9:5, 13:10, petitioner 4:12, 12:2 property 4:6, 4:23, 13:3, 20:8
14:15 petitioners 3:24, 5:4, 5:17, 6:11, 7:8, recommendations
One - family 4:5, 4:21, 11:20, 12:2, 12:5, 13:24, 15:19, 13:9
11:24, 15:17 12:15, 15:11 16:13, 16:20, 17:2, recommended 13:6
one - quarter 4:7 PHILIPCHUCK 17:3, 17:6, 17:7, record 4:17, 12:11
ongoing 16:16 15:24, 16:3, 16:4, 17:15, 18:1, 19:19, recreational 18:9
open 6:22 19:9 19:22, 20:12 reduced 14:19
opportunity 16:21 phonetic 4:24, 8:3 proposed 11:21 related 20:21
Opposed 3:13, 6:24, pie- shaped 7:2 protecting 9:6 remain 8:8
21:19 piece 14:16, 14:17 provide 13:10 remaining 19:19
orderly 6:17 placement 9:10 provided 18:10 remains 8:10
originally 14:2 Plan 1:1, 4:15, 5:18, providing 6:14 remember 12:18
outgrowth 5:10, 7:8 5:18, 5:22, 6:19, 7:5, public 3:3, 3:7, 3:18, rendering 8:5
oversized 6:15 7:10, 7:14, 7:17, 7:17, 11:18, 12:24, REPORT 1:6
owned 18:15 7:24, 8:14, 8:19, 13:18, 14:9, 21:5, Reporter 23:8
owner 4:22, 13:24 9:23, 13:22, 14:8, 21:9, 21:24 represent 4:21,
owners 5:1, 5:23, 14:14, 14:15, 16:1, pump 20:2 12:15
19:22 16:17, 16:18, 16:20, purposes 18:9 representatives
owns 5:2 16:21, 16:24, 17:9, put 10:15, 10:23, 4:22
18:10, 18:18, 19:8, 11:7, 14:3 request 12:2, 19:4
19:8, 19:14, 19:14, putting 14:20 requesting 4:2,
< P > 20:10 15:13
P.M. 1:9 Planned 15:16, 17:4 require 13:5
Pam 11:19, 12:15, planning 6:1 < Q > Residence 4:5,
12:16, 14:3 plat 13:15, 16:16, quadrant 5:15 11:24, 15:17
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
28
residential 5:19, sewer 6:17 12:12, 13:11, 13:13, understand 11:2,
13:22, 17:10, 19:6, sharing 18:20 13:14, 13 :18, 16:6, 19:2
19:17, 20:14 Shorthand 23:8 17:20, 17:22, 18:22 UNIDENTIFIED
Response 3:9, 3:14, shot 7:15 subject 17:3 10:10, 10:19, 10:24,
9:3, 11:16, 15:7, show 14:23,14:23 suburban 5:19, 7:13 11:5
20:22, 21:6, 21:15, showing 5:22 suggested 18:19 Unit 15:16, 17:4
21:20 shown 8:13,13:22 sworn 3:1, 3:20, United 1:2, 2:14, 4:1,
responsiblity 18:17 shows 5:18, 14:15 8:16, 23:7 4:3, 4:4, 5:10,11:21,
retention 11:5 side 4:9, 10:14, system 18:13 11:23, 12:8, 15:12,
review 20:18 10:14 15:14, 15:15
revisions 16:23 sides 16:14 unlikely 13:20
rezone 11:22 signify 3:11, 21:17 < T > USDA 13:16
rezoning 4:3, 15:14 single - family 5:20, talked 18:4 uses 17:23,19:16
Richard 15:10 7:12 tape 23:11, 23:14 utility 5:16
River 12:7 sir 7:21, 9:20 terms 6:19
Road 1:9, 6:5, 12:7, sit 21:2 testified 4:15, 7:24,
12:7, 13:23, 14:23, site 11:7,17:21, 8:19, 9:23, 16:1 < V >
15:21, 16:14, 16:14, 18:1, 18:4, 18:5, 18:6 thinks 3:17 various 18:11
16:15, 16:17, 17:12, size 6:20 three 3:18, 12:19 version 14:20
18:2 skewed 6:7 TOM 2:2 versions 14:19
Ron 7:23, 8:2 small 19:13 tomorrow 19:8 versus 19:5, 20:13
Route 4:8, 4:9, 4:9, smaller 14:14,19:16 tonight 4:24, 7:6, via 18:2
10:2, 12:6, 15:20, Smith 16:10 12:17,13:2, 14:10, VITOSH 1:8,23:6,
16:13, 17:7, 17:23 somewhere 8:13 19:2, 20:8 23:24
South 4:20, 12:7, topography 11:7
12:12, 13:12, 14:24, touched 11:10
<S> 15:21, 16:14 town 5:5 <W>
SANDRA 2:3 southern 14:2 Township 12:8 wanted 6:9,13:10,
sanitary 20:1 southwest 5:15 trade -offs 18:4 15:2
saw 12:19 SPEAKER 10:10, transcribed 23:10 wants 9:14
saying 3:11, 10:3, 10:19, 10:24, 11:5 transcript 23:14 Water 6:17, 11:10,
21:17 speaking 4:11 transribed 1:7 16:6
says 23:7 special 12:3, 13:4, TRAVIS 2:10 welcome 21:2
SCHILLINGER 2:8 13:5, 14:11 tree 10:9, 10:18, West 4:8, 8:8, 8:11,
school 18:1, 18:7 spurs 6:22 10:22 16:5
Second 3:5, 11:18, square 6:21, 7:4 trees 10:11, 10:11 wetland 9:6, 9:10,
11:19,19:1, 21:11 ss 23:2 tried 6:18, 6:20 9:11
seconded 3:7, 21:13 Staff 5:13, 6:1, 6:13, true 23:13 Wheeler 16:15,
Section 12:4 13:9,14:9, 15:2, Trust 11:20 17:12
seem 9:15 16:12 trying 9:7, 9:9 WHEREOF 23:17
seen 13:9, 19:3, staking 14:14 two 4:22, 6:3, 10:5, WHEREUPON 4:13,
20:17 stand 3:19, 10:11 14:6,18:23 7:22, 8:17, 9:21,
separate 10:16 State 4:19, 12:14, types 19:16 15:23
Service 11:23, 14:4, 23:1, 23:8 Whitehouse 9:1
15:17, 17:16, 19:23 station 20:3 whole 5:7,12:23
services 5:16 stay 9:2 < U > widening 6:19
session 13:3 storage 20:4 ultimately 13:20, will 5:2, 6:13, 7:2,
set 23:17 Street 4:20, 9:11, 18:7 7:3, 8:8, 8:12, 8:15,
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
29
11:8, 11:17, 13:14,
13:17, 13:20, 14:7,
15:9, 16:16, 16:18,
17:3, 17:6, 17:14,
17:17, 17:24, 18:7,
18:14, 18:15, 20:2,
20:3, 20:15, 20:16
William 9:22, 10:1
willing 6:2, 10:15,
10:23
windows 13:23
within 17:18
without 17:22, 17:22
WITNESS 23:17
Witnesses 3:1, 3:20
Woodlands 3:23
Woods 5:7
words 6:14
work 5:14, 6:10,
9:13
working 6:1, 13:3,
19:21
WYETH 2:13
<Y>
Yorkville 1:2, 1:10,
2:15, 4:1, 4:3, 4:4,
4:15, 4:20, 5:9, 5:11,
7:24, 8:3, 8:19, 9:23,
11:21, 11:23,12:12,
15:12, 15:14, 15:15,
16:1
<Z>
zoned 17:2, 17:3,
20:13
zoning 7:13, 12:22,
13:6, 19:3, 19:4,
19:11, 19:14,20:9,
20:21
< Dates >
may 24, 2006 1:8,
1:8,1:8
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
1636 Yorkville, Illinois 60560
Telephone: 630 -553 -4350
�
o� Fax: 630 -553 -7575
5e o
<<E
PLEASE SIGN IN
r 1 �
n
MEETING:
DATE: 5 /94ioC_P
NAME COMPANY PHONE NUMBER
e 7 C �
1 /fik l Z y eoo SS3 7 7
1
�oss mew
S - 0- 33Y
ore-