City Council Minutes 2011 01-11-11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS,
HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
800 GAME FARM ROAD ON
TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2011
Mayor Burd called the meeting to order at 7 :07 p.m. and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Clerk Milschewski called the roll.
Ward I Gilson Present
Werderich Present
Ward I I Golinski Present
Plocher Present
Ward III Munns Present
Sutcliff Present
Ward W Teeling Present
Spears Present
Also present: City Clerk Milschewski, City Treasurer Powell, Attorney Orr, Police Chief Hart, Deputy
Chiefs of Police Delaney and Hilt, Public Works Director Dhuse, Finance Director Fredrickson, City
Engineer Wywrot and Community Development Director Barksdale - Noble.
QUORUM
A quorum was established
i
INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS
Mayor Burd asked the staff and guests to introduce themselves. She welcomed the guests and asked them
to enter their names on the attendance sheet provided.
AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
Alderman Spears requested that Item #I wider the Mayor's Report, Park Naming Request — Marge Cluie
(CC 2010 -104) be tabled until the February 8, 2011 City Council meeting due to an additional application
being received.
Amendments approved unanimously by a viva voce vote.
Mayor Burd requested that Item #6 under the Mayor's Report, State of the City Address (CC 2011 -03) be
moved up to Item #1 under her report.
Amendments approved unanimously by a viva voce vote.
COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Public Works Committee Meeting: 6:30 p.m., January 18, 2011
City Hall Conference Room
Economic Development Committee: 6 :30 p.m., February 1, 2011
City Hall Conference Room
Administration Committee Meeting: 6:00 p.m., January 20, 2011
City Hall Conference Room
Public Safety Committee Meeting: 6:30 p.m., January 27, 2011
City- Hall Conference Room
PRESENTATIONS
None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Mike O'Connell, Fos Run, commented that a resident was upset about the increase in taxes at the last
City Council meeting. He noted that the city only gets 5% of real estate taxes whereas 70% goes to the
School District. He felt the city was being demonized. He noted that Kendall County and the School
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council — January 11, 2011— page 2
District have approved raises. He felt that if the School District cut 2% it would exceed what the city has
cut. Also, Kendall County should make an effort to cut tales as well. He also discussed the amenities the
city has such as the water park, kayak chute, old jail, etc. He stated that the city has the opportunity to get
80% toward bike trails. He felt bike trails would attract people to the city which would help grow the tax
base. He noted that Wisconsin turned down a high speed rail system so California stepped up for the
finds. If the city- does not take IDOT funds for the trails some other community will.
Judy Somerlot, Friends of the Yorkville Library, reported that the library submitted an application to the
Pepsi On Line Project which is a grant program. The library is a finalist and is hoping to win fiords so
they can purchase star - shaped yard signs to give children who complete the library summer reading
program. Thirty-two grants will be awarded each month based on online votes. She explained the voting
procedure and distributed a handout regarding the grant. She encouraged everyone to vote for the library.
Mayor Burd indicated that she would have the city's PR person add the information to the city's news
blast.
Rolph Snobeck, Grande Reserve, stated he was an avid cyclist and that he would like to see bike paths in
Yorkville however the question is do we want paths or need paths. He felt public safety is a # 1 concern
and noted that there have been accidents due to snow not being plowed. He asked if the City Council had
the public's trust. He noted that in November there was a referendum on the ballot for the bike paths and
it did not pass. Each member of the City Coumcil has won an election. He questioned what would
happen if their opponent wanted a "re-do", would the City Council let it happen? Once a vote fails, it
fails and there are no "re- dos ". He asked how much it would cost to maintain the bike trails if they are
built and where the money would come from. He also questioned what would happen if the state does not
come up with the money. He noted that the state has not come forward with money it promised to other
projects such as new roofs for the Brookfield Zoo. He asked what the rush was for the trails. He noted
that two weeks ago the City Council chamber was packed with union guys in support of the trails. He
asked how many of them actually live in the city. He questioned who they were to demand a job from the
city. He stated that it his job as a boss, not the taxpayers, to find work for his employees. He encouraged
residents to speak out at the next election in April. The city, state and the voters are broke. If there is no
money, a project should not be done. Mayor Burd explained that the cost for the trails would be about
$13.00 a year depending on the value of a home. Also, the city is not front funding the trail project, if the
state does not give the city the fiuids, then the trails won't be built.
Jesus Almaraz shared Mr. Snobeck's sentiments. He stated that programs are good but sometimes the
fiords for them are not there. He felt that the paths were a good idea however this was a bad time for
them. He added that he felt that if taxes were going to be increased it should be for the Police and Fire
Departments.
Elizabeth Snobeck, Grande Reserve, stated she was a student athlete who runs cross - country in college.
She is required to nor and bike so she would like paths however people are in debt and this problem
should be taken care of first. She stated that she is part of a unique population of new residents. The only
tie to Yorkville is through her parents. She asked the City Council to look at the big picture and see
where young home buyers are going. She stated she couild purchase something in a neighboring
community and pay less taxes.
Todd Milliron, Cotswold Drive, noted that the reason for the bike path issue at this time is because IDOT
is doing improvements to Routes 47, 71 and 34. The bike trails are part of the projects. He explained that
MFT funds are a dedicated revenue source for the payment of the project. He felt this is a onetime shot
and if the money does not come from the state then the city will have no reason for the bonds. He stated
that it is being put on the ballot again so that with more information the voters can make a choice.
CONSENT AGENDA
None.
PLAN COMMISSION /ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL
None.
MINUTES FOR APPROVAL
A motion was made by Alderman Sutcliff to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting of October
26, 2010, November 9, 2010 and November 23.2010; seconded by Alderman Plocher.
Motion unanimously approved as amended by a viva voce vote.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council — January 11, 2011— page 3
BILLS FOR APPROVAL
A motion was made by Alderman Sutcliff to approve the paying of the bills listed on the Detailed Board
Report dated January 5, 2011, totaling the following amounts: checks in the anount of $614.247.07
(vendors); $223,142.22 (payroll period ending 1 /1 /11); for a total of $837,38929 (total); seconded by
Alderman Werderich.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0
Plocher -aye, Spears -aye, Munns -aye, Sutcliff -aye,
Gilson -aye, Teeling -aye, Golinski -aye, Werderich -aye
REPORTS
MAYOR'S REPORT
State of the City Address
(CC 2011 -03)
Mayor Burd presented the 2010 State of the City Address (see attached).
Ordinance 2011 -01 Approving a Land Lease Agreement with Verizon Wireless
(2225 Wheaton Avenue, Wheaton Woods Park)
Second Reading
(CC 2010 -114)
Mayor Burd entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving a Land Lease Agreement with
Chicago SMSA Limited Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless (225 Wheaton Avenue, Wheaton
Woods Park) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Plocher;
seconded by Alderman Munns.
Attorney Orr thanked Alderman Golinski for his question about the language in an earlier draft. The
language was discussed with Verizon and corrected.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0
Sutcliff -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Plocher -ave,
Werderich -aye, Golinski -aye, Teeling -aye, Gilson -aye
Tax Abatement Ordinances
(CC 2010 -111)
Abating the Tax Hereto Levied for the Year 2010 to Pay the Principal of and Interest on $3,500,000
General Obligation Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2004B (Countryside Interceptor)
Abating the Tax Hereto Levied for the Year 2010 to Pay the Principal of and Interest on $3,020,000
General Obligation Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2007A (Refinance 2003A)
Abating the Tax Hereto Levied for the Year 2010 to Pay the Principal of and Interest on
$11,300,000 General Obligation Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2005D (Rob Roy Creek)
Abating the Tax Hereto Levied for the Year 2010 to Pay the Principal of and Interest on $2,020,000
General Obligation Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2008 (Refinance Rob Roy Creek)
Abating the Tax Hereto Levied for the Year 2010 to Pay the Principal of and Interest on $3,825,000
General Obligation Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2005A (In -Town Road Program)
Mayor Burd entertained a motion to approve the Tax Abatement Ordinances for the following General
Obligation Bonds: Series 2004B — (Countryside Interceptor); Series 2007A — (Refinance 2003A); Series
2005D. — (Rob Roy Creek); Series 2008 — (Refinanced Rob Roy Creek) and Series 2005A (In -Town
Road Program) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Sutcliff;
seconded by Alderman Plocher.
Burd clarified that a "no" vote to abate the ordinances would mean the cost will be put on the real estate
tax bills. A "yes" vote will create an issue of how to pay for the bonds. She noted that the City Council
asked the Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District for financial help but they are unable to help.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council — January 11, 2011 — page 4
Aldennan Gilson read a statement regarding his feeling on the abatement ordinances (see attached email).
Alderman Plocher asked Alderman Gilson if he supported a fee for the sewers on the water bills.
Alderman Gilson stated he did not support residents paying any added fees.
Alderman Sutcliff noted that a "yes" vote is like saving it is okav to default on loans. She felt there is no
other solution. She stated she would not be responsible for the city defaulting on loans.
Alderman Spears stated that the City Council was warned about outstanding financial obligations by
former City- Administrator McLaughlin in an October 10, 2008 memo (see attached). She stated that she
voted against the city budget due to this warning. She felt Mr. McLaughlin's warning was ignored and if
steps had been taken in 2008 this might not be happening. She stated that previous administrations are
getting blamed but this present council was aware due to the memo.
Alderman Munns questioned how defaulting on the bonds would affect the city. Finance Director
Fredrickson explained that if the city defaults it tivill be impossible to obtain future bonds. He reminded
the Council that a fee of $62.00 can be placed on each water bill to pay off the bonds. Alderman Munns
stated that people can criticize past administrations but ideas are needed now to come up with something
better.
Mayor Burd noted that Administrator Olson had distributed a memo indicating what future cuts could be
made however this would be cutting all staff except the Police Department. She stated that when the bad
debt was recognized, she implemented a Bad Debt Policy and the funds were no longer used as a revenue
source. She explained that money is being taken out of the water fund to pay back the Grande Reserve
development due to the mismanagement of funds. She added that the City Council cannot let the
financial situation deteriorate so that future projects are negatively impacted by the lack of financing. She
added that if the increase in sales tax is approved, these bonds can be abated next year and taken off real
estate tax bills.
Motion defeated by a roll call vote. Ayes -3 Nays -5
Munns -nav, Spears -ave, Plocher -nay, Werderich -nav,
Golinski -aye, Teeling -nay Gilson -aye, Sutcliff -nay
Approval of a Revised Early Retirement Proposal
(CC 2011 -01)
Mayor Burd entertained a motion to approve a revised early- retirement proposal from Sergeant Bang
Groesch and authorize the Mavor to execute. So moved by Alderman Plocher; seconded by Alderman
Sutcliff.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0
Sutcliff -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Plocher -aye,
Werderich -aye, Golinski -ave, Teeling- aye, Gilson -aye
Resolution 2011 -01 Providing for and Requiring the Submission of a Proposition to Impose
a Non -Home Rule Municipal Retailers' Occupation Tax and
Service Occupation Tax in the Amount of 1% to the Voters of the
United City of Yorkville at the General Election to be held on April 5, 2011
(CC 2011 -02)
Mayor Burd entertained a motion to approve a resolution providing for and requiring the submission of a
proposition to impose on Non -home Rule Municipal Retailers" Occupation Tax and Service Occupation
Tax in the amount of I% to the voters of the United City of Yorkville at the General Election to be held
on April a, 2011 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Aldennan Plocher:
seconded by Alderman Sutcliff:
Mayor Burd felt the increase in sales tax was the best solution in order to get the bond payments off the
real estate tax bills. If the referenduun is approved, a commitment was needed from the City Council to
use the proceeds to fund bond payments so that the bonds can be abated next year. She was asking for
this now due to the upcoming election. If the City Council approves this at this time, a special election for
the referendum won't be needed. She noted that the bond payments will escalate before they are paid in
full. Also, if the city has a dedicated revenue source, it will be easier to refinance the bonds.
Alderman Munns asked what would be put in place to dedicate the proceeds to the bond payments.
Attorney Orr explained that once the money comes in, the funds are placed in the general fund. The City
Councif can pledge the fiords towards the payment and/or refinancing of the bonds. Alderman Munns
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council — January 11, 2011 — page 5
asked if any studies have been done as to how this would affect the local economy or if the increase had
been discussed with the business community. Mavor Burd stated that no studv or discussion had taken
place. She noted that this was the last might to vote on the resolution so that the referendum could be
placed on the April ballot. If it does not go on this ballot, the city will have to pay for a special election.
She felt that Alderman Munns had a good question and she suggested that the matter be discussed with
the Chamber of Commerce.
Alderman Golinski asked if a sunset clause would be added so that the increase in the tax would only be
applicable until the bonds are paid off. Attorney Orr stated that if the revenue source is temporary, it
cannot be used toward the refinancing of the bonds. However, if another revenue source comes in, the
sales tax can be decreased as long as the new source is dedicated to the bonds. There was a brief
discussion on shopping at other communities versus in Yorkville. Alderman Golinski noted that he, like
many people, passes several stores on his way home from work and could easily shop elsewhere. He
stated that even if he could do this, he would still shop in Yorkville.
Alderman Spears stated that currently other surrounding communities are equal in tax_ She felt that
increasing the sales tax in Yorkville would take the city out of competition with area communities. She
stated she discussed the increase with a few businesses that were dead set against it. She questioned if the
increase would deter businesses from coming to Yorkville. She felt that people were more willing to pay
for gas than pay a higher sales tax. Also, she was concerned that if the residents vote this down and
people on the City Council don't like the results, would it be brought back for another vote. She stated
she could not support the increase.
Alderman Gilson also felt the increase was a detriment to local businesses however he did not have a
problem asking residents for their opinion on the April ballot.
Alderman Sutcliff stated that this was an effort to lessen the burden to the residents. She noted that the
sales tax affects others who shop in Yorkville not just residents. She felt a message needed to get out to
residents because they are anti -tax. If they vote for the referendum it will bring relief to their property
taxes.
i
Mavor Burd noted that if the referendum is voted down it ,� t be evident that residents want the increase
on their property tax bill. She stated that unless astronomical growth is seen, the property tales will
probably be affected next year too.
Alderman Golinski questioned the timing of the increase if the residents vote it in. Attorney Orr thought
that if the increase is adopted at the April election it would become affective in January 2012 however she
was going to verify this.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -6 Nays -2
Plocher -aye, Werderich -ave, Golinski -nay, Teeling -aye,
Gilson -aye, Sutcliff -ave, Munns -aye, Spears -nay
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
None.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
No report.
CITY CLERK'S REPORT
No report.
CITY TREASURER'S REPORT
- No report.
CITY ADMINISTATOR'S REPORT
No report.
DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION'S REPORT
No report_
FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No report.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council — January 11, 2011— page 6
CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
No report.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT
No report.
CHIEF OF POLICE'S REPORT
No report.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT
Director Barksdale -Noble reported that the Integrated Transportation Plan group meets once a month to
track the progress of the plan and funding. In December they discussed a grant that was available in
November 2010 for the Kennedy Road path and the city's commitment to the project. They wanted
information on other grants that might be available to help reduce the city's share of the commitment.
She also reported on the Building Code Update Committee. Their goal was to be done by the end of 2010.
They have reviewed and discussed amendments to six out of ten codes. If the remaining codes are
completed there should only be two more meetings before sending the amendments to the city attorney
for review. After Attorney Orr's review, there will be a public hearing for the amendments.
COMMUNITY RELATIONS OFFICER'S REPORT
No report.
COMMUNITY & LIAISON REPORT
Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District
Alderman Gilson reported that he attended the Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District meeting on January 10,
2011 where they discussed two proposals; lending the city money and lowering fees. They also discussed
discontinuing their cell phone service, visiting Plainfield's facility and the Deuchler report on expansion.
- Springfield
Alderman Sutcliff reported that she was back from Springfield where she attended the inauguration. She
stated she met with the governor. senators, IDOT, etc. She stated she brought the needs of Yorkville to
the state in order to establish a good relationship. Mayor Burd added that she would be going to
Springfield for Kay Hatcher's swea.rulg -in ceremony.
Northeastern Illinois Area Agency on Aging
Alderman Spears reported that she attended the Northeaster Illinois Area Agency on Aging (NEIL)
meeting (see attached report)_
COMMITTEE REPORTS
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT
Proposed Revisions /Clarifications to Letter of Credit Policy
(PW 2010 -75)
Ordinance 2011 -02 Amending the City Code Providing for the Posting of Improvement
Securities Prior to the Issuance of a Building Permit
A motion was made by Alderman Plocher to approve an ordinance amending the City Code providing for
the posting of improvement securities prior to the issuance of all building permanent and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute; seconded by Alderman Munns.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0
Werderich -aye, Golinski -aye, Teeling -aye, Gilson -aye,
Sutcliff -aye, Munns-ave, Spears -aye, Plocher -aye
Ordinance 2011 -03 Amending the City Code Amending the Requirements for the Posting of
Maintenance Bonds
A motion was made by Alderman Plocher to approve an ordinance amending the City Code amending the
requirements for the posting of maintenance bonds and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute;
seconded by Alderman Munns.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council — January 11, 2011— page 7
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0
Golinski -ave, Teeling -aye, Gilson -aye, Sutcliff -aye,
Muums -aye, Spears -aye, Plocher -aye, Z1l%erderich -aye
Resolution 2011 -02 Amending Resolution Number 2009 -40 Clarifying the Policy on the Release
of Security for Land Improvements
a motion was made by Alderman Plocher to approve a resolution amending Resolution Number 2009 —
40 clariA ing the Policy on the Release of Security for Land Improvements and authorize the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute; seconded by Alderman Teeling.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Aves -7 Nays -1
Teeling -aye, Gilson -nay, Sutcliff -aye, Mumns -aye,
Spears -ave, Plocher -ave, Werderich -ave, Golinski -ave
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
No report_
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT
No report.
ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT
No report.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Old Jail
Aldennan Golinski reported that there was a broken window in the door of the Old Jail. Mayor Burd
stated that it happened recently and that the door was in the section of the building to be removed. It will
be boarded up. She added that the commission for the Old jail would be meeting soon.
KenCom
Alderman Golinski stated that he had a possible solution to the KenCom funding problem. He suggested
that Kendall County check if it would be possible to add a fee on to their court costs. Attorney Orr stated
that there is a statutory amount to be paid and she would check into Alderman Golinski's suggestion.
Mayor Burd stated that she suggested an increase to the 911 surcharge on cell phones.
River Front Park
Aldernian Golinski asked how the city acquired River Front Park. He showed the City Council a copy of
a warranty deed from the Meinert family dated 1981 _ The deed indicates there is a covenant and
restriction on the park name. He stated he would provide staff a copy of the deed. Director Dhuse and
Community Development Director Barksdale -Noble stated they would investigate the deed.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Attorney Orr stated that she forgot to indicate at the amendment portion of the meeting that there would
be no executive session tonight.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Burd entertained a motion to adjourn the meeting. So moved by Alderman Plocher; seconded by
Alderman Spears.
Adjournment of the meeting was unanimously approved by a viva voce vote.
Meeting adjourned at 8:54 p.m.
Minutes submitted by:
Jacquelyn Milschewski.
City Clerk City of Yorkville, Illinois
REGULAR. CITY COUNCIL MEETING
January 11, 2011
PLEASE PRINT
NAME: SUBDIVISION OR BUSINESS:
`
e vi
a4e //e Ile
U t
air o r c (L
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
lF% — Gc t.%mLt-j—%
January 11, 2011
PLEASE PRINT
NAME: SUBDIVISION OR BUSINESS:
/G / Crier/
51
fl Y�l- L P L
�fizc��e 5n
E/ I n r
SIGNIN
I
I
I�
c1 p
Memorandum
To: City Council
EST , 1836 From: Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director
.� CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator
p Date: January 11, 2011
SCE Subject: Change in Bill List Amount
I
There was an error in the processing of a reimbursement check issued to Ald. Robyn Sutcliff for
expenses incurred relating to Holiday Under the Stars. The original amount entered of $258.02
included duplicate receipts. The corrected check amount to be approved is $129.01.
As a result of this correction, the bill list totals for tonight's meeting have been reduced by
$129.01, from $614,247.07 to $614,118.06.
I
' I
I
II
State of the City 2010
Each year since I've been mayor, I've given the City Council a summary of the State of
the City in January. This is my fourth such update.
I don't think this City Council needs me to tell it that we are living through some very
hard times — hard for Yorkville residents who are struggling to make ends meets, to keep
their homes out of foreclosure, and to keep food on their tables. We are also, as a City,
facin g the same issues that our residents are facing — how to pay bills that we can not cut
out of our budget. We also have to decide how to provide services. How to keep
Yorkville a great place to live and give our residents the most benefits for the money they
send us in their taxes.
In 2010, Yorkville found itself struggling, like all our fellow municipalities, to get
through the worst recession we have faced in our lifetimes. Our issues have included
falling revenues, continuing landfill- related litigation that is bleeding money from our
general fund, foreclosed developments with vacant lots and unpaved streets (sometimes it
seems that Bank of America owns half of Yorkville), rising health -care expenses, and
ballooning bond payments on infrastructure improvements to sewer and water services.
In ?O10 the City had to institute the first water service rate increase in eight years and put
into place a water infrastructure improvement maintenance fee to pay the City's water
bonds because the City has lost its tap on fees that were meant to pay for all the
infrastructure improvements. In 2010 we learned that the previous administration's fail -
safe back -up plans to cover these bond payments had, in fact, failed and now all
Yorkville residents, all of us, are on the hook.
A similar problem is before you tonight, only this time it is for our sewer bond payments.
Our options are limited. Let the payments go onto property taxes. Increase the monthly
sewer bills. Or let the bonds default. No matter who is sitting in these seats next
December, if we don't take the right actions tonight, in May 2012 the property tax bill
will be even higher and it will continue to escalate. Could we have solved these bond
payment issues last year by cutting the general fund sooner? You all know that cuts to
our operating expenses would not make a dent in this $2-1 million sewer bond deficit we
are projecting for this year's sewer payment. To toss that out as a possible solution just
doesn't tell a true picture of what's going on with our City finances. Cuts in the general
fund replace legal and bad debt and revenue losses; they don't cover these massive
deficits in the water and sewer funds. Why didn't my administration come forward with
solutions sooner? Because the solutions we have found — putting the payments onto the
real estate taxes or increasing the rates, are not something that I, or that anyone on the
City Council, would want to do until it needs to be done. I am for doing what is needed
when it is needed and now is the time that action is needed, not last year and not next
year. These are hard decisions to make, but we need to make them, and we need to do it
now. And I believe that now is the time we need to decide to take the burden of the
sewer bond payments off of our residents future property taxes and put it onto a less
onerous sales tax. And we need to get the message out to our residents that this sales tax
will allow the Council to get the sewer bond payments off of the 2012 property tax bills.
We need to remember that many of our business owners pay property taxes too.
o
We began 2010 with a 20% reduction in our full -time staff and we would see another 9
people laid off at the end of the year, bringing the reduction to almost 30 %. This past
year, we continued our second year of week -long furloughs in all departments but police,
our hiring freeze except for two department heads who were replaced, and our wage
freeze. I would like to here say that we are very fortunate in our employees. Our new
Police Chief Rich Hart and City Administrator Bart Olson were able, without lawyers, to
negotiate a new police contract that included a provision for a wage freeze. This is very
unusual in municipal government, but it shows that our officers understand that we all
need to work together if we are going to get through these hard times. I thank them for
their spirit of cooperation and I think they prove what I've been told many times, we have
the best police force in the Kendall County.
Our other employees have gone through three years of wage freezes, and staff reductions.
They are doing more with less and I think they also are doing a great job for our
residents. I'd like to thank them too for all they do, plowing our streets over the holidays
at all hours, getting out and fixing broken water mains in all kinds of weather,
maintaining our parks and providing information to our residents. It's not easy to see
your fellow workers laid off. My having to approve those layoffs were the hardest thing
I've had to do during my four years as mayor. But those final layoffs should help balance
the general fund through 2011/2012.
But we still have financial issues. Moving into this year's budget discussions, the
Council will have to decide what to do about our elusive fund balance. After writing off
$1.7 million of bad debt and with the $1 million drain from the landfill litigation, the
City's $2.6 million fund balance has disappeared. It almost makes me wish I had
i
continued to use the former administration's method of reporting the fund balance by
including the bad debt as revenue, which would now show us to actually be up by $1.7
million. But at the end of the day, I think it is better to know the truth and try to fix the
problem, than hide it and hope it goes away. So one of our goals is going to have to be to
fix this deficit, but these general fund problems have to date been handled without
resorting to real estate tax increases and I am sure the Council will continue to follow that
path.
Another budget discussion we will be having is about including development fees in our
general fund revenues. In the past, this money was used to pay for new employees'
salaries, but it is not a sustainable revenue source and I want it moved into another fund,
such as the capital fund, where it can help to pay for one -time projects. And of course,
we will be talking about the REC Center and its ongoing impact on the City's budget. Is
it worth it to us as a City to pay $60,000 a year to provide that facility and all that it offers
for our residents in recreation programs? Can we make more cuts to bring down that
deficit? I plan to sit down with the Walkers, the owners of the building, in the next
month and see how amenable they are to renegotiating the lease in light of the recession
and decreasing property values. But this is a decision we will have to make by the end of
this year — to keep the REC Center or to opt out of the lease in 2013.
Back to 2010 It wasn't all doom and gloom. On a brighter note, this past year we
purchased the Old Kendall County Jail, and with almost $6,000 in our budget from the
Jail of the Dead Haunted House, the City will have enough money to pay the building's
insurance and incidental expenses for at least three years. So contrary to dire predictions
made when the City purchased the property, this project should not cost our taxpayers
anything to maintain and it has already brought a lot of people a lot enjoyment.
Hopefully, the Haunted House will become a Halloween fixture for our downtown.
We were able in 2010 to work with two developers, Pulte and McCue Builders, to extend
developments agreements to mirror those that were in place in 2006, and as a result, they
both are continuing to build in existing developments in Yorkville. I look at that as
something positive, because we need our vacant lots built on if we are going to move out
of our current financial situation.
i
Even in these tough economic times, we had several new businesses open their doors in
Yorkville this past year, including the Ultimate Sports Bar which includes the Hawthorne
Off Track Betting facility, Hoppers Inflatable Bouncers, Donati's Cafd, Lakeview Bar &
Grille, Yorkville Sports Academy, the Hampton Inn, General Laboratory Products, Todd
Lawrence Photography, Steps for Kids, Nuture Your Pet, NetComm Communications,
Tacos, Tacos, Tacos, Design 99, and Ulta Cosmetics, and Subway opened a second
location on the City's southside. Some of our businesses, like Home Depot, Target and
Kohl's, report that they are leaders in their areas for increasing revenue generation.
That's good news, because all of this means more sales tax revenue for our City.
This past year, the Illinois Department of Transportation moved forward with planning
for the widening of Rt. 47 through our downtown, something that several of the members
of this Council have been working to bring about for many years. Bids are scheduled to
be let at the end of this year on that project, and planning is moving forward on the
widening of Rts. 34 and 71. Yorkville's major arterial roads are all slated to be widened
and improved, finally. But somewhere in our City budget, within the next two years,
Council members will have to find funding to address our side streets, streets like Game
Farm Road that are crumbling and desperately need attention. That is another challenge
the City has to face.
This coming year we will see construction begin on the new Rush - Copley emergency
room, and the opening of the Car Care Collision Center and Hertz, and I am continuing to
meet with groups interested in forming a coalition to build a solar panel energy plant in
our area. This coming May, the City will join with state officials in the official opening
of our White Water Park, the only facility of its kind in the entire state of Illinois, and in
our northwest region. We are already seeing kayakers down at the riverfront, even in
cold weather, trying the chutes. An influx of new people in our downtown is going to
attract new businesses, and I predict that within months, the City will be announcing
plans for new development in our downtown.
There are a lot of good things happening in our city. There are a lot of opportunities, and
yes, there are a lot of problems still left to resolve. I would encourage the City Council
members to bring forward their ideas and to become part of the solution process. Just
because the staff and I present our recommendations doesn't mean they are written in
stone. If you have a better idea, don't wait for an invitation to speak. Each and every one
of you has a forum at least four times a month at City Council meetings to state your
ideas and to work with your fellow Council members in a positive way. I would like to
thank all the members of the Council for the hours you have spent, working on behalf of
your constituents during this past year. And I look forward to working with you in the
coming months.
Thank you.
i
Page 1 of 2
Jackie Milschewski
From: <gilsonwardl @comcast.net>
To: "Jackie Milschewski" <jzm401 @sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 12:29 PM
Subject: Tuesday's Comments For The Record
Jackie,
Please find below my comments on Tuesday as it related to the Tax Abatements and the
Proposed Sales Tax Referendum for the record:
Tax Abatement Ordinances:
I have already stated my feelings on this at the previous City Council meetings. If better
budgeting practices were kept to realize that these bonds were due to be paid by a certain date
and the City would have acted responsibly and reacted sooner with the appropriate adjustments,
then we would not be passing on as steep of fees and or taxes that we are now proposing on our
residents. It is my understanding that the City decided to go forward with approximately 25
million dollars of sewer debt in the name of growth, that should have been paid by developers
and or upfront fees.
The City went forward with these bond dollars without any responsible plan to pay off these
bonds as growth slowed and revenue diminished. It is my understanding that according to a
report I read that our water and sewer system was expanded to serve over 30,000 people, which
is almost twice our current population in Yorkville.
In additions to the actions taken by our City before my tenure as alderman, the City is also
paying back the Grande Reserve developer for water connection fees that we agreed to rebate
once collected. The City collected these fees, but never rebated the developer when collected,
thus resulting in litigation and court order.
The City has written off roughly 1.43 million dollars of debt due to the failure to collect
developer deposits up front per the City's policy. The mayor mentioned 1.7 million dollars
tonight and this is the first time I have heard this number. I was not a part of that past
administration and myself and the residents, more importantly the residents of Yorkville were
not responsible for getting us into this mess.
I have voted against and continue to oppose our current budget as passed, and all non - priority
spending and acquisitions that some of the current members of council have and continue to
support.
I cannot and will not embrace and ratify added taxes and fees on the residents for all of the poor
budgeting, governing, and mismanagement with my vote. You can dramatize this stance, play
politics with this stance, or point fingers at me for the blame, but I cannot and will not vote for
any added taxes and fees on our residents in light of the situation I have outlined and detailed
here tonight.
I don't know if I have a 100% solution to this problem, other than use improper budgetary
procedures to funnel more cutback savings into paying down these bonds and or refinancing
these bonds and PROPERLY managing a long term payoff. One thing is for certain, 1, like the
majority of our residents, are sick of poor governing, excess spending, and mismanagement of
our tax dollars. Therefore I cannot vote to embrace adding this burden onto the residents. I liken
this to having a car payment. I budget for my car payment when it comes due each month. If I
cannot come up with the funding for the payment, I do not ask someone else to pay it for me.
Sales Tax Referendum:
2/3/2011
Page 2 of 2
I also feel that there may be detriment in increasing our sales tax, but in light of our current situation, I
have no issue going to the voters to ask their permission on this one. I think I know what their answer
will be. Increasing any taxes in this time of recession is troublesome to me.
Respectfully,
George Gilson Jr.
Alderman - Ward I
United City of Yorkville
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device from U.S. Cellular
II
I
I
2/3/2011
Memorandum
To: Mayor Burd & City Attorney Orr
W. Z 1836 From: Brendan McLaughlin, City Administrator
Date: October 10, 2008
C9 y`2C Subject: Outstanding Financial Obligations
v
LE �
i
As a follow up to our meeting of August 26 I have prepared a listing of the known, significant financial
obligations of the United City of Yorkville.
LITIGATION
1. Landfill Litigation — The IPCB is expected to hold hearings this fall and render a decision in the
first quarter of 2009. At that time the city's legal costs should reduce dramatically. To date the
legal fees associated with the landfill have been approximately $225,000. - 3 1 coo
2. Aspen Ridge Litigation — In multiple claims against the City, the owner of the Aspen Ridge
property is claiming breach of contract and fraud against the city. The insurance carrier has
denied coverage for this claim. Damages sought exceed $24 million and there is no estimate on
defense costs at this time. This is a demand that the city also pay John Wyeth's attorney fees as
he claims that he was an employee of the city and entitled to a defense pursuant to state law.
Illinois law mandates municipalities defend an employee against any claim so long as the
{ employee was acting in the scope of his or her employment.
3. tayCom Litigation — Yorkville and Centex are being sued for breach of contract. Damages sought
are over $12 Million.
I
UTILITY RECAPTURES OR IMPROVEMENTS
4. MPI Water Improvements Reimbursement — The city committed in the 2003 Annexation
Agreement to enter into a reimbursement agreement with MPI (Grande Reserve Developer) for
the regional water improvements they installed. The city is expected to turn over all water fees
generated north of the river and east of 47, within a specific water pressure zone, to MPI. To
date, the City has not reserved any of the funds collected and has been funding capital
improvements and operations within the water fund with these monies. The estimated payment
to MPI is $1.2 million.
5. Fox Hill Utility Recaptures — The text in the 1993 Annexation Agreement and 2003 Recapture
Agreement can be interpreted that the City would have to pay if future development within the
defined benefitted area does not tap into the oversized water and sewer lines installed as part of
the Fox Hill subdivision. Estimates related to Rob Roy Falls development put the price tag for this
obligation at $1,141,000, for which the city may be totally responsible.
6. Bristol Bay Stormwater Basin — In the 2005 Annexation Agreement, the city has obligated itself to
build the stormwater basin to serve developments in the northern portion of the city. It is
estimated to cost $4,000,000 and be built as development occurs.
'f y f rn��n.
i
7. Inland Sanitary Sewer — The city committed in the 2004 Annexation Agreement to have a sanitary
sewer interceptor installed to serve 47 and Baseline Road. The city had planned on an approved
development south of the Inland property to develop and fund the installation of the pipe, but
that development has not progressed. The project is estimated at $1.4 million for which the city
may be responsible.
8. Centex Loan — Centex lent the city $105,000 to design the wetlands within the Raymond Regional
Detention Area. Repayment is due in 2010 and includes prime rate interest plus two percent per
the 2005 Annexation Agreement.
9. Windett Ridge Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement — The city is expected to pay the developer of
Windett Ridge $170,000 for sanitary sewer oversizing per the 2005 PUD Amendment.
1o. Raintree Village Sanitary Sewer Reimbursement — The city is expected to pay the developer of
Raintree Village $318,433 for sanitary sewer oversizing per the 2002 Annexation Agreement
Amendment. The revenues to pay down this obligation are the $108 per year sanitary sewer
charge placed on each customer within Raintree Village.
11. Autumn Creek Sanitary Sewer Recapture — The City has committed in the 2005 Annexation
Agreement to waive 190 sewer connection fees ($2,000 each) for the next 190 building permits
applied for in the Autumn Creek subdivision as part of the Autumn Creek Sanitary Sewer
Recapture /Recovery Agreement.
ROAD CONSTRUCTION
12. Fox Hill Permanent Signal — In 2007, the city committed to IDOT to have the signal installed in
2010. Cost estimate is $250,000. If Rob Roy Falls does not annex and develop, the city shall be
responsible to pay for this signal.
13. Kennedy & Mill Road Improvements — Under the 2004 Grande Reserve Annexation Agreement,
the city will receive $1.1 million dollars to im ove Kennedy Road from developers. The actual
price tag to improve the road is closer to $1. million. Construction timing is based on permit
issuance and is currently forecasted for��iscal Year 2010/11 to coincide with the opening of
Autumn Creek Elementary. (f }-, , 7
14. Game Farm Road /Somonauk Improvements — First applied for in 1999, this federally aided road
project is slated for Fiscal Year 2009/10. The city portion of the $5.6 million project is $3.3
million. MFT dollars are expected to pay for this project.
15. Route 47 Improvements — This state project with matching federal funds is expected to have a
local share obligation in excess of $1.7 million for utility relocation, sidewalk installation and
traffic signal modifications.
16. Eldamain Road Improvements — Based upon the 1999 Boundary Agreement, the city is obligated
to spend the next $1 million dollars before Plano is expected to cost share on a 50/50 basis as
7.
development occurs. It is expected that development on the Yorkville side would have to fund
these improvements.
17. Fox Road — The city is expected to receive a LAPP grant in 2008 to fund improvements to Fox
Road. The city's share is projected at $140,000 and the federal aid amount is $430,000 for a total
project cost of $570,000.
OTHER
18. Club 47 Lease — The monthly lease payments are expected to be covered by monthly revenues
generated from memberships and parks programs. The total lease obligation to the City is
N $1,086,000 over 5 years per the 2008 Lease /Purchase Agreement.
19. 2007 Clark Property Installment Purchase - $300,000 over three years.
J 20. 2008 DPW Land & Building Purchase - $1.25 million
21. Hoover — Various infrastructure improvements were contemplated in the original agreements. It
is anticipated that a new agreement will be developed relieving the city of any infrastructure
obligations. Rough projections for water, sewer and park improvements exceed three million
dollars.
SALES TAX REBATE OBLIGATIONS
The City has had a practice of rebating half of the sales tax generated from new commercial
developments back to the developer of the site for public improvement costs identified in each
incentive agreement. These commitments are memorialized in either annexation agreements or
economic incentive agreements. Below is a list of developments that the City has entered into these
agreements by year along with key points from detailing the city's obligations.
2000
22. Menard's — 50% Sales Tax Rebate for Roads "A" through "C" for 10 years "from the date of
acquisition of the 'subject property' by owner ". Certain other improvements are to be paid back
in full over the term of the agreement. (Agreement dale July 13, 2000 term 20 years under Ordinance 2000.32 and amended on October 11, 2001)
23. Yorkville Crossings — 50% Sales Tax Rebate. Certain improvements are to be repaid in full with
4.2% interest with a maximum repayment period of 15 years, but not commencing until
Menard's Incentive Agreement has been completed or expired. (amended agreement dated March 11, 2008 under Ordinance
2008 -21; original annexation agreement dated July 13, 2000 under Ordinance 2000 -34)
24. Prairie Gardens — 50% Sales Tax Rebate - Certain improvements are to be repaid in full, with a
maximum term of 12 years from the execution of this agreement. (agreement dated July 27,2000, Ordinance 2000 -36)
25. Herren Property (Ratos, Asparagus Crate) — 50% Sales Tax Rebate. Certain improvements are to
be repaid in full with 5% simple interest per annum with a maximum term of 20 years. (NEC of 47 &
Cornelis, agreement dated July 25, 2006, original annexation agreement dated September 28, 2000 under Ordinance 2000 -50)
2001
26. Yorkville Marketplace Part 1 —50% Sales Tax Rebate for certain improvements to be repaid in full
with 5% simple interest per annum with a maximum term of 18 years from the one year
anniversary of the date of passage and execution of this agreement. (Agreements on March 1, 2001 term 20 years under
Ordinance 2001 -7a and Ordinance 2001 -76 (for Jewel and property north and east of it);
27. Yorkville Marketplace Part II — 50% Sales Tax Rebate for certain improvements to be repaid in full
with 5% simple interest per annum with a maximum term of 18 years from the one year from
March 30, 2001. (Agreement on May 24, 2001 under Ordinance 2001 -29 and 2001 -30 (for strip centerwest of Jewel)
28. Yorkville Marketplace Part III — 50% Sales Tax Rebate for certain improvements to be repaid in
full with 5% simple interest per annum with a maximum term of 18 years from the one year from
April 1, 2002. (Agreement on May 24, 2001 under Ordinance 2001 -29) "Additional Reimbursable improvements" up to
$515,000 for the traffic signal at Route 34 and Marketplace Drive are entitled to be recovered
until March 31, 2025. (Agreement on February 27, 2007 under Ordinance 2007.19)
2002
29. Cannonball Trail Development (Ratos Property) — 50% Sales Tax Rebate for certain improvements
are to be repaid in full (no timeframe) plus 5% simple interest per annum. (Agreement dated June 11, 2002 under
Ordinance 2002 -15)
2003
2004
2005
3o. Lincoln Prairie — 50% Sales Tax Rebate for certain improvements are to be paid back in full. (A
dale May 24, 2005 under Ordinance 2005.48)
31. FE Wheaton — 50% Sales Tax Rebate for certain improvements are to be repaid in full with 5%
simple interest per annum with a maximum term of 10 years from the date of passage and
execution of this agreement (March 1, 2005). Economic Incentive agreement commences March 1, 2005, original commitment under Ordinance 1995.05 dated March
8, 1995.
2006
32. O'Keefe (Raging Waves) — 55% Amusement Tax Rebate which is 5% plus 50% sales tax rebate for
Route 47 improvements including right of way with six percent interest. Certain improvements
are to be repaid in full with a maximum of 20 years (explicit). Ordinance 2006 -101 the exact text related to ROW Is as
follows: 'The period of computation of the sales tax rebate agreement will begin separately for DEVELOPER, and OWNER when OWNER undertakes development of
Lot 1. The period of computation shall begin for DEVELOPER, and OWNER upon occupancy of the first unit of commercial retail development within each respective
Lot on the SUBJECT PROPERTY, and will continue for a period of twenty (20) years or until the OWNER and DEVELOPER have been rebated one hundred percent
(100 %) of their Route 47 land dedication, as well as one - hundred percent (100 %) of any required Route 47 Improvements and /or slgnalization including but not limited
to design, engineering, as well as six percent (6 %) Interest whichever occurs first." (Amended agreement dated June 10, 2008 under Ordinance 2008 -50)
I
33. Kendall Marketplace — 50% Sales Tax Rebate and 0.5% Business District Tax Rebate to pay bonds.
Business District has a term of 23 years (development agreement approved August 22, 2006 under Ordinance 2006.88; business district tax created
December 12, 2006 under Ord 2006 -147; Business District Tax Bond Ordinance approved December 12, 2006 under Ordinance 2006.148; Sales Tax Bond Ordinance approved January 23, 2007
under Ordinance 2007 -09;)
2007
34. Kappos Property — 50% Sale's Tax Rebate for certain improvements are to be repaid in full with
3% simple interest per annum with a maximum term of 20 years. (agreement dated Jan 23,2007 (SW corner of Route 47 and
Cornelis Road) under Ordinance 2007 -08)
35. Fountain View — 50% Sales Tax Rebate for certain improvements are to be repaid in full with 3%
simple interest per annum with a maximum term of 20 years. (agreement dated April 24,2007 under Ordinance 2007.361
36. Yorkville South (MPI) — 50% Sales Tax Rebate for certain improvements are to be repaid in full
with 6% simple interest per annum with a maximum term of 20 years, but not commencing until
the first occupancy in the commercial unit is issued. (agreement dated February 27 ,2007 under Ordinance 2007 -24)
2008
37. Countryside Center - 50% Sales Tax Rebate to cover TIF bonds (23 years) and Alternate Revenue
Bonds (23 years) in that order. In addition, business district will be formed for an additional 1%
sales tax that will be used to pay off the TIF and alternate revenue bonds. Business district has
not been formed yet, and (new) bonds have not been sold. (Agreement date August 12, 2008 under Ordinance 2008 -73; original
Redevelopment Agreement dated March 8, 2005 under Ordinance 2005.21)
38. Yorkville Town Center — Not more than a 50% of Sales Tax Rebate with maximum of $1,600,000
with no interest assessed and paid over 12 years pursuant to a separate Economic Incentive
Agreement (not yet established). The 2008 agreement contains clause which commits the
developer to have a 40,000 sf tenant in place prior to any rebates, and 80,000 sf in additional
tenants within 5 years from date of Economic Incentive Agreement (a dated Ma 27,2008 under Ordinance 2008 -43)
39. Cobblestone Commons — Business district contemplated. 50% Sales Tax Rebate to payoff bonds.
(agreement approved on August 26, 2008 under Ordinance 2008 -80, has not been recorded yet awaiting payment of fees.)
LITIGATION COVERED BY IML INSURANCE
U ANCE
40. Huss Litigation — There is a case against the city for damages to a contractor who had an
excavation collapse on him during a water main break. He claims the water was not shut off
quickly enough. Insurance is expected to cover any potential judgment.
41. Anderson Litigation — This is a case where a woman tripped and fell adjacent to a work site.
Insurance is expected to cover any potential judgment.
I
12/14/10
LIAISON REPORT
NEIL DECEMBER BOARD MEETING
Mr. Eric Weakly, NEIL Planning Staff member, had
resigned and is now working at the Administration
on Aging in Washington D.C.
The Veterans Independence Project (VIP) that Mr.
Weakly had been working on is doing very well.
NEIL and its VIP grantees are in process of
reviewing 26 veteran referrals.
The Kendall County Transportation Service had
received the Governor's Award e G e a d for Unique
Achievement.
LEGISLATIVE COMM., ITTEg REPORT:
Drug recalls — The committee reviewed HR 5740
which would give the Food & Drug Administration
increased authority to intervene when a
manufacturer recalls a prescription drug or over -the-
counter drug due to contamination, adulteration,
1
misbranding, or other significant quality problem.
The ultimate tool would be authority to order an
immediate recall if there is an immediate threat;
which the FDA currently is not authorized to do.
Social Security payback option — Retirees
receiving Social Security have the option of
stopping their benefits and paying back everything
they have received, and then resuming the benefit
either immediately or later at a higher rate. Few
people are aware of this option, and even fewer
exercise it due to the difficulty of repaying and the
uncertainty of life expectancy.
Most of those who use the payback option were
either very unhappy in retirement and eager to
return to work; or, had been highly paid and were
recalled by their employers due to a unique skill. He
added that Social Security had originally been a
retirement benefit, but it had become an annuity
when people were allowed to continue working
without loss of benefits after reaching the full age of
retirement. of staff time. The current payback option
is another annuity characteristic.
2
The Social Security Administration was proposing to
limit the option to once in a lifetime and only during
the first year of receiving benefits. This proposal
would be an administrative rule, not a congressional
action.
It was noted that the Social Security Administration
used to have "public information officers" who
helped the general public understand this complex
program. This position had been eliminated, and
there was a widespread confusion and
misinformation about benefits, contributions, the
program's long -term solvency, and other aspects of
Social Security
Poverty and income data
The number of people of all ages in poverty had
increased from 39.8 million in 2008 to 43.6 million in
2009, the third consecutive year of increase, and
that the number of poverty in 2009 was the highest
since the government began measuring poverty 51
years ago.
3
Waste and fraud in Medicare and Medicaid
The House Energy & Commerce Committee's
Health Subcommittee recently held a hearing on the
effort to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse in Medicate
and Medicaid programs, especially in home health
and durable medical equipment. The Affordable
Care Act increases funding and provides several
new tools and resources to combat these costly
problems. It was noted, the staff working on fraud
detection and prevention is too small and often
poorly trained, and that doctors and other providers
who are trying to defraud the program quickly learn
techniques such as multiple billings for the same
procedure. They know how to keep their scams
small enough to avoid detection. Many common
practices are wasteful, although not fraudulent, such
as buying new walkers and wheelchairs for every
patient, rather than re -using them.
4
01 -11
LIAISON REPORT
HOLIDAY MEALS ON WHEELS UPDATE
• H2O10 Holiday and weekend delivered meals surpassed the
i
21,562 meals delivered in 2009. Without including December
statistics, 24,042 nutritious meals have been delivered on
holidays and Saturdays to hungry seniors. With December still
to report for some providers, we are certain to break the 2007
record of 24,532.
• An additional $718 donation was received last month.
• The first week of the New Year, the Agency received $325
in donations. A $100 donation was a result of the Suzette's
Dine Around mailing.
• SUZZETTE% DINEAROUND: On Thursday, January 27 ", patrons
may pretend they are dining in France. Donna Hesik and Suzzette's staff
are excited to host the first Dine Around meal. To date, 15 reservations
have been received. Space is limited in this quaint intimate restaurant.
If you would like to attend this 3- course sit down dinner, please call the
Agency's Kim Robey at: (630) 293 -5990 to secure your reservation.