Loading...
Plan Council Minutes 2008 04-24-08 t APPM Plan Council April 24, 2008 Attendees: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Charles Wunder, Urban Planner Stephanie Boettcher, Sr. Planner Jackie Dearborn, Civil Engineer Anna Kurtzman, Zoning Coordinator Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Travis Miller, Dir. Of Comm. Development Sgt. Don Schwartzkopf, Yorkville Police Brendan McLaughlin, City Administrator Guests: Gary Neyer, Marker, Inc. Todd Roberts, Merit Corp, Inc. Dan Kramer, Attorney Pete Huinker, SEC Group Scott Underwood, Titanium Dev. Group Keith Lacy, Barrington Engineering The meeting was called to order at 9:10 am by Joe Wywrot. The March 27 minutes were approved with one correction. Richard Marker &Associates—Mile and%Review The petitioner seeks county B-3 zoning classification, which is not consistent with the proposed land use of Neighborhood retail by the City's comprehensive plan. The county B-1 zoning classification is more consistent with the City's recommended land use. The County B-3 zoning allows these uses: drive thru business, financial institutions, taverns, liquor stores, gasoline service stations, and boat rental/storage, which are considered special uses in the city's zoning ordinance. The pre-annexation agreement expired in 2007. There is currently no public utility infrastructure on the property. The petitioner has no end user in mind, hopes to market the property, and thinks this piece would eventually annex to the city along with a larger piece. The petitioner had a favorable meeting with Kendall County regarding this property. Brendan McLaughlin questioned whether the petitioner would have any benefit to a re-negotiated annexation agreement for this property, but the petitioner prefers the flexibility the buyer would have for remaining in the County, or petitioning the City. The railroad right of way, along the east side of Rt. 47 and owned by ComEd, will be required to cross the property to access Route 47. Ms. Kurtzman recommends the City's setbacks and coverage in the zoning code be adopted for this property. Mr. Neyer, representing the petitioner, agreed to dedicate the right of way along Ament Road. There is no pressure zone currently in existence on this property. This will be presented at the May 14 Plan Commission. Fountainview I DTD Investments—Amendment to PUD Ms. Kurtzman stated the amendment had several references to the PUD and she questions why the petitioner is seeking straight B-3 zoning. Dan Kramer suggested the City had recommended a PUD in earlier meetings. 1 4 The petitioner is asking for a 33' right of way, moving the sidewalks out of the right of ways. The concern was providing the original setback of 40'. The width of the lot is the contention. The petitioner asks for a 7' reduction in the setback. There is a parking setback with a landscaping between the parking and the side walk. The commercial user wants the building to face Route 47. Ms. Kurtzman stated side yard setbacks are established for fire protection. Mr. McLaughlin suggested reducing the interior setback lines between the two interior lot lines. The petitioner will move the lot line between lots 2 and 3 further north. Joe Wywrot stated his concerns regarding Fountainview Drive. The petitioner is stating there will be a southbound stop and westbound stop,but the traffic heading east and turning left off Fountainview Drive would be free flowing. The petitioner is now waiting for a response from IDOT. The petitioner will file an amendment to the ordinance, will modify the language and have amendment language to the City by April 23. The petitioner may suggest to the City additional parking stalls on the north side of the building on Lot 3. This is scheduled for the May 14 Plan Commission. S_ tagecoach Crossin-—Preliminary/Final Plan Ms. Boettcher stated property parking should be provided and questioned if any parking would be shared between buildings. The petitioner will provide an overlay for the City. Any petitioner on a lot with a drive-thru business must now apply for a special use, to comply with a new amendment to the zoning ordinance. Joe Wywrot said IDOT may want to gain control of the trapezoid shaped area adjoining Route 47. If this is the case, the property will need to be designated a separate lot, conveyed to the state. A cross access easement should be expanded to include an easement across Lots 5 and 7, for property to the west, and across Lot 7 to the property to the north. The property to the west is land locked, and there is a retaining wall running about 2/3 of the length of the west side. A driveway from Lot 5 is being recommended by the city, or at the least, a continuation of the drive aisle along the north side of Lot 5. The storm water maintenance documents should be contained in the homeowner covenants. The storm water detention areas are tied to lots 3 and 7, and proportionate detention area splits could be assigned to each lots. A memo with additional notes for additions to the mylar, will be due on May 2 - needed are: proportionate best management storm water accessments; a plan for maintenance of parking areas; potential assignment of the separate trapezoid lot to IDOT; and ingress/ egress easements to be granted. This will be presented at the May 14 Plan Commission. Prairie Point Lot 2 B, Crimson Lane—Special Use Ms. Boettcher stated the parking spaces must all be 18.5'. The landscape median should be a minimum of 10'. All subdivided lots must be provided with proper ingress and egress. The changes will be done by the petitioner. Ms. Kurtzman stated all of Lot 2 be shown, as the northwestern section of Lot 2 will be landlocked, creating a non-buildable lot. The fence should be constructed of 2 f materials similar to the primary building. The petitioner will be using constructing a masonry wall with a front gate. Joe Wywrot stated that storm water best management practices should be required of this developer. The landscaping should be incorporated in the interior landscaping areas. He recommends that the end parking stalls be protected by landscaping islands, which would mean that there would be two stalls less. To increase the number of stalls, the petitioner may share parking with the owner, PrimeAmerica. This may be the easier way to rectify the parking issue. A drive way exit potentially could be added to the west or to the north. The petitioner should demonstrate to the Plan Commission that the remainder of Lot 2 is buildable. This is scheduled for the May 14 Plan Commission. Minutes submitted by Annette Williams 3