Loading...
Plan Commission Minutes 2005 04-13-05 Page 1 of 6 APPROVED 5-11-05 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLAN COMMISSION YORKVILLE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS WEDNESDAY, APRIL 13, 2005 7:00pm Chairman Tom Lindblom called the meeting to order at 7:03pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Sandra Adams, Charles Kraupner, Clarence Holdiman, Michael Crouch, Brian Schillinger, Tom Lindblom. A quorum was established. GUESTS: Mayor Art Prochaska, Alderman Rich Sticka, City Attorney John Wyeth, City Planner Mike Schoppe, John Whitehouse of Engineering Enterprises, Inc. Chris Vitosh-Court Reporter. See also the attached sign-in sheet. MINUTES (March 9, 2005) Mr. Holdiman commented he thought the meeting had ended earlier than indicated. Since the time had not been recalled by anyone, the minutes were approved as written Motion made and seconded by Sandra Adams and Clarence Holdiman, motion approved. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Moved and seconded by Mike Crouch and Sandra Adams to enter into Public Hearing. Motion carried. Chairman Lindblom swore in those making presentations. 1. PC 2005-02 Montalbano Homes and Conifer Group, LLC, Petitioners, application to annex and rezone property at Ament and Penman Roads. Continuation of Public Hearing held March 9. See attached. The Public Hearing was concluded at 7:15pm and Chairman Lindblom asked if there were any questions or comments from the public. Since there were none, he asked for a motion to close the hearing. Clarence Holdiman and Sandra Adams moved and seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. PRESENTATIONS None. OLD BUSINESS None. Page 2of6 NEW BUSINESS: 1. PC2005-02 Montalbano Homes and Conifer Group,LLC, Petitioners for annexation and rezoning. Mr. Lindblom corrected an earlier statement that annexation was being requested, and said it was only for rezoning from A-1 to R-2 PUD. He asked for questions or comments. Mr. Whitehouse commented briefly on the roads as they relate to the possible school site. Mr. Whitehouse also said he was concerned about the availability of sewer and water service since the property is not contiguous to the City. He added that there is funding available for off-site water and sewer. He said there is an MPI project in the vicinity, which is also not contiguous. According to Mr. Whitehouse, YBSD sewer plans include a pump station at Aux Sable Creek and Ashley Road, west of Route 47. Water will come from an extension of the City water. He added that a possible water site had been identified on the MPI property. There is also an unnamed tributary of Aux Sable Creek for which the City will be passing a wetland ordinance with buffer requirements. City Planner Mike Schoppe commented that this concept plan complies with the comprehensive plan and also complies with the Park District open space request. He further stated the roads are laid out well. Mr. Schoppe added that several people are concerned about the quality of the water in Aux Sable Creek as development begins. Additional information is needed on the following according to Mr. Schoppe: 1. Road concerns 2. Landscape buffer 3. Trail issue Mr. Schoppe addressed questions to Montalbano representative Andy Fitz, concerning lot sizes and discussion with the schools. The size of the lots that back up to open space are a minimum 10,000 to 11,500 square feet and all other lots are 12,000 or more. Mr. Fitz stated that his understanding is that the City will take the initiative to talk with the schools and obtain a letter of approval. Commissioner Schillinger stated he would like to see the bike and hike trails lead to the school so they would be accessible for children walking to school. Since the basin will be designated as a"wet basin", Mr. Crouch, as a school board member, voiced a concern for the safety of children with a school site near the wet area. He suggested talking to the school district. Mike Schoppe asked why the basin would be considered wet rather than dry. A wet basin will reduce sedimentation. It was also Page 3 of 6 suggested that the wet basin could be a 6-inch depth for safety and plants could be added for esthetics. Mr. Schillinger expressed concern regarding increased mosquito populations in a wet area. There was a brief discussion regarding the entrances into this development as they relate to emergency use and flow of traffic. As there was no further discussion, Chairman Lindblom stated there were two issues up for vote: 1. Recommendation for the R-2 PUD for zoning 2. Preliminary PUD plan approval Legal counsel also recommended a ruling on the annexation at which time the property does become contiguous. It was noted that currently this property is three-quarters of a mile from the City limits. Mr. Lindblom entertained a motion for annexation when the property becomes contiguous to the City. Motion made by Mike Crouch and seconded by Charles Kraupner. Motion unanimously passed on a roll call vote with the following voting yes: Holdiman, Crouch, Kraupner, Adams, Schillinger and Lindblom. Regarding the R-2 PUD for zoning: Schillinger moved and Crouch seconded to approve. Passed unanimously on roll call vote as follows: Holdiman, Crouch, Kraupner, Adams, Schillinger and Lindblom voted yes. 2. PC 2005-02 Lee Farm—Preliminary PUD Plan Chairman Lindblom asked for a motion of approval of this plan. Crouch moved and Adams seconded to approve. Discussion: Mr. Schillinger asked that design standards be upheld for this plan. The motion was amended by Crouch and seconded by Adams to include the following items: 1. to follow the design guidelines 2. take staff comments into consideration 3. relocation of the trail 4. speak with the school superintendent The original motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote as follows: Crouch, Kraupner, Adams, Schillinger, Holdiman and Lindblom voted yes. The board then voted on the amended motion with voting as follows: Crouch-nay, Kraupner-aye, Adams-nay, Schillinger-aye, Holdiman-aye and Lindblom-aye. Motion passed 4-2. Page 4 of 6 3. PC 2005-10 Whispering Meadows Units 3 & 4—Final Plat Richard Young of Kimball Hill Homes appeared before the commission to seek final plat approval. Mr. Schoppe noted the developer had done a good job of considering staff comments. Mr. Lindblom asked Mr. Young to review street names with KenCom since one street name was duplicated with an existing street. A motion was made by Mr. Crouch and seconded by Mr. Schillinger to accept the final plat subject to staff comments. Motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote: Holdiman-aye, Crouch-aye, Kraupner-aye, Adams-aye, Schillinger-aye, Lindblom-aye. 4. PC 2005-13 MPI South—Concept Plan John Philipchuck, attorney for MPI, gave an overview of this development located on the south side of Yorkville. The property encompasses 724 acres and will feature a school site, 5-acre site for a Fire Department, public facilities and commercial sites. John Martin of Jeri Land Design presented the details of the plan. Mr. Martin noted the general boundaries of the property as follows: Rt. 47 at Legion Rd. on the east, Walker Road on the south, Immanuel Road on the west and Ament Road on the north. He divided the presentation into 2 parts: 1) Suburban Area and 2) Transition Area. The suburban area holds the Aux Sable Creek watershed. He described the transition area as anything south of the creek, which would have multi-family housing and townhomes Mr. Martin said the open areas will be tied together with a bike path system which is part of a regional plan. There will be 171 acres of open space in the northern part of the plan. In addition, there will be a 35-acre school site with a possible 5 more acres. A 25-acre lake will be the primary stormwater management tool for the area. Duplexes, courtyard and townhomes will be included in the suburban area as well. Mr. Martin commented that a courtyard neighborhood would minimize the garage door appearance. A 10-acre commercial site will be included on the corner of Wheeler and Route 47 with improvements being made at that intersection. Landscape buffering will be included as well. Mr. Martin recapped the presentation by saying this 724-acre property would hold 1742 housing units with a density of 2.4 per acre. Parks will comprise 26 acres of the development. Page 5 of 6 Engineer Paul Leder then spoke. He stated that most of the floodplain along the creek would be retained as open space. Mr. Leder added that potential reservoir and well sites have been identified in this area. He also gave an overview of the potential water and sewer service. This concluded the presentation and Mr. Philipchuck asked for any discussion or comments. Mr. Crouch stated that while the comprehensive plan called for much commercial,this development did not provide much. He expressed reservations that multi-family housing was suggested for areas where there is nothing within walking distance for residents. Ms. Adams asked what the difference is between townhomes and courtyard homes. Mr. Leder explained that a townhome has a front-loaded garage. A courtyard townhome has porches and front doors facing a landscaped courtyard with alleyways located in the rear. Mr. Schillinger commented that he felt the southern portion was too densely populated. He also voiced disapproval of the alleyways in the courtyards. He cited Oswego's "Hometown"development,which features the alleyways. Ms. Adams questioned how fire equipment would access alleyways. Mayor Prochaska stated there are some alleyways in Fox Hill and Grande Reserve. Mr. Schoppe asked for the commissioners' comments on density. Commissioner Schillinger said the south half of the project is too dense. Chairman Lindblom concurred with this assessment and said the percent of single family vs. other housing is not balanced. He also voiced concern on the overall impact on the traffic situation. Mr. Philipchuck noted the close proximity of the future Prairie Parkway to help alleviate the traffic problem,however, Mr. Lindblom countered that the Prairie Parkway is undecided at this time. He felt multi-family will contribute greatly to the traffic problem. The impact on the school district was also noted along with those students' necessity to cross the bridge for school further adding to the traffic congestion. Overall,the commissioners reminded the developers that it was desired to maintain a more rural flavor in the southern part of the City. Mr. Schoppe noted that the comprehensive plan cites the"view corridor"near Highpoint Road and the desire to preserve that. Mr. Crouch requested front and back dimensions of the courtyards area. It was also noted the architecture plans/ideas should be given to the commission. Page 6 of 6 ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: 1. Yorkville Commons—Notice of Withdrawal of Request for Special Use and Variances by Petitioner The City Council requested the Commission to vote on accepting this withdrawal. Crouch moved and Adams seconded to accept this withdrawal. Passed unanimously on a roll call vote: Holdiman, Crouch, Kraupner, Adams, Schillinger and Lindblom voted to accept. Mayor Art Prochaska said 4 years ago there was a workshop with the Plan Commission. He suggested another one since there are new members on both the Plan Commission and City Council. He also noted that the south Comprehensive Plan had been passed by City Council. A motion for adjournment was made by Schillinger and seconded by Holdiman. This passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9:22pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker PLAN COMMISSION MEETING UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE , ILLINOIS REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had at the meeting of the above-entitled matter taken before CHRISTINE M . VITOSH, C . S . R . , on April 13 , 2005 , at the hour of 7 : 00 p . m. , at 800 Game Farm Road, in the City of Yorkville , Illinois . D-755505 —01 REPO - COURT reporting service 800 West Fifth Avenue • Suite 203C • Naperville, IL 60563 • 630-983-0030 • Fax 630-983-6013 www.depocourt.com 2 1 P R E S E N T : 2 MR . TOM LINDBLOM, Chairman; 3 MR . CLARENCE HOLDIMAN; 4 MS . SANDRA ADAMS ; 5 MR . BRIAN SCHILLINGER; 6 MR . MICHAEL CROUCH; 7 MR . CHARLES KRAUPNER; 8 MR . MIKE SCHOPPE; 9 MS . MARLYS YOUNG . 10 A P P E A R A N C E S : 11 WYETH, HEITZ & BROMBEREK 300 East Fifth Avenue , Suite 380 12 Naperville, Illinois 60563 ( 630 ) 355-1458 13 BY : MR . JOHN JUSTIN WYETH, appeared on behalf of the United 14 City of Yorkville, Illinois . 15 16 - - - - - 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 3 1 (WHEREUPON, 2 proceedings were had 3 which were not 4 reported . ) 5 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : At this time I 6 would accept a motion to go to public hearing . 7 MR . CROUCH : So moved . 8 MS . ADAMS : Second . 9 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Moved by Mike 10 Crouch, second by Sandy Adams . Any discussion on 11 the motion? 12 (No Response ) 13 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Hearing none , 14 those in favor signify by saying aye . 15 (A Chorus of Ayes ) 16 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Opposed? 17 (No Response ) 18 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Motion passes 19 and we are now in public hearing . With that 20 being said, would anybody that wishes to address 21 the Commission please stand and raise your right 22 hand and repeat after me? 23 (Witnesses sworn) 24 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : This will be PC Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 4 1 2005-02 , Montalbano Homes and Conifer Group, LLC, 2 petitioners , have filed an application with the 3 United City of Yorkville , Kendall County, 4 Illinois , requesting annexation to the United 5 City of Yorkville and rezoning from Kendall 6 County A-1 Agricultural to United City of 7 Yorkville R-2 One-Family Residence District 8 Planned Unit Development . 9 The real property consists of 10 approximately 155 . 825 acres at the southeast 11 corner of Ament and Penman Roads , Kendall 12 Township, Kendall County, Illinois . 13 I would just remind everybody 14 that this is a continuation of the public hearing 15 that was held on March 9th . 16 I didn ' t mention it , but 17 anybody wishing to address the Commission, please 18 come forward, state your name for the record, and 19 then we can proceed from there . 20 So with that , I ' ll turn it over 21 to -- just as you sat down . 22 MR . FITZ : Thanks . I didn ' t know if 23 you would take public comment first . 24 WHEREUPON : Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 5 1 ANDY FITZ , 2 having been first duly sworn, testified before 3 the Plan Commission as follows : 4 MR . FITZ : Good evening . Andy Fitz 5 with Montalbano Homes . I have with me here 6 tonight Michael May from Cemcon, is our civil 7 engineer for the project ; John Glyman with Glyman 8 Design is the land planner; and our landscape , we 9 also have -- I ' m sorry, I haven ' t met you before 10 tonight . We also have our landscape designer 11 here as well . 12 What I ' m going to do is just go 13 through a brief Power Point presentation, I know 14 you ' ve got another item on the agenda , and then 15 I ' m probably going to turn it over to John to 16 cover the land plan a little bit , and I ' ll be 17 happy to take questions . 18 Hopefully you can all see this 19 all right . I don ' t know if you want to dim the 20 lights or not , but -- Thanks . 21 The property is on the 22 southeast corner of Penman and Ament . Here is 23 Ament, Penman . It ' s basically flat . There is a 24 slight drainage area running through it here . Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 6 1 I ' m just going to run through 2 very briefly our previous submittals . We were 3 before this Commission before . Our previous 4 concept plan originally showed the park centrally 5 located, there is not a school site on it . We 6 had a couple of entrances and a 20-foot landscape 7 buffer . 8 The revised concept that we 9 then submitted based on Staff and Plan Commission 10 and Board input showed a 40-foot landscape 11 buffer . 12 We showed a six-acre park next 13 to a four-acre school site . We preserved the 14 drainage way and also show a path along it . 15 I realize this is pretty quick, 16 but I am going to come back to the preliminary 17 plan again . 18 This is our preliminary plan . 19 In brighter yellow you see the lots that are less 20 than 12 , 000 that abut open space, the park and 21 school in the same place , of course, and path 22 along the creek . 23 These are representative of the 24 type of homes that we propose to build on the Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 1 site . We have four models at this time . Of 2 course , there will be between 12 and 16 models , 3 each with three elevations , so 36 to 40 some 4 homes would be built . 5 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Excuse me, just 6 a second . 7 MR . FITZ : Yes , certainly . 8 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : On this issue 9 did Plan Commission members get these delivered 10 to your house? 11 (A Chorus of Ayes ) 12 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Okay . I didn ' t 13 know if they were not . I ' m sorry . 14 MR . FITZ : That ' s all right . No 15 problem . Let me back up here . 16 As far as landscaping features , 17 we propose the landscape boulevard medians . 18 This is a project we did in Willow Springs . 19 There is a sign there, as well as quite a bit of 20 foliage . 21 This is a project in Joliet 22 that we did . This is an example of a pond that 23 we did in an area with a path running along it , 24 and here is another example of a pond with a Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 8 1 trail , sidewalk, along it . 2 This is an example of a project 3 we did in Aurora where we had quite extensive 4 landscaping along a heavily traveled roadway, 5 which I believe Penman is -- Ament rather, is 6 intended to be in the future . As you can see , 7 there is really some nice landscaping . 8 This is a historic -- Well , not 9 historic, but historic-type street lighting 10 fixture that we would like to use . I haven ' t 11 checked the village codes ; if that ' s something 12 that ' s allowed, that ' s something we would like to 13 do . 14 So, in summary, we feel we have 15 provided a significant single-family 16 subdivision -- that went by fast . That ' s okay, 17 I ' ve got to remember that . 18 But the focus is on open space 19 with the active park site , school site, as well 20 as the trail along the drainage way would be 21 preserved . 22 There are -- there is a tree 23 line running through here , that ' s -- that we -- 24 the trees aren ' t of great quality, but they are Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 9 1 large, and most of those will be preserved, 2 except for where we ' ve got the path . 3 We reduced the access to one 4 along Ament -- or Penman rather , and that was in 5 some meetings where Staff thought that two 6 probably wasn ' t necessary there , provided an 7 additional stub to the south, and the only lots 8 that fall below 12 are those that abut the open 9 space . 10 One thing I would like to 11 address real briefly is a couple of comments . We 12 read through Staff ' s comments , and for the most 13 part we are in agreement with them. 14 One of the things that I called 15 both Tony Graff and Mike Schoppe and we discussed 16 prior to the meeting, just so it wasn ' t cold 17 turkey, was the request for a 50-foot landscape 18 buffer along Ament . 19 Originally we had 20 and then 20 we doubled that to 40 and the City requested 50 . 21 There is a couple different options ; put in an 22 additional ten-foot landscape buffer or, Mike -- 23 I don ' t want to put words in his mouth -- but he 24 stated that when lots abut open space , there ' s Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 10 1 been a policy for allowing slightly less than the 2 standard, so if we were to bump that up to 50 , 3 those 12 , 000 would fall to 11 , 250 or 11 , 3 , but 4 there would be that 50-foot buffer along Ament . 5 The other issue was the path . 6 Part of the issue -- part of the -- in preserving 7 that , the discussion with the Village and the 8 Board centered around allowing smaller lots next 9 to that in return for preserving the path, so we 10 have done that, and we had the intent of keeping 11 the path private . 12 Now Mike has informed us that 13 there are standards that require a 40-foot 14 setback from a lot line for a public path, and I 15 related to Mike and Tony that I don ' t really see 16 how there is any way we can do that . 17 We can provide at least ten and 18 at some points there is a lot more than that , 19 there is 40 , but it varies , and I don ' t want to 20 have to come in and ask for a variation to allow 21 for something less than that, so that ' s something 22 that I guess we need to work on, but our 23 compromise offer would be a minimum of ten and 24 then, of course , it would vary up to 40 or 50 . Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 11 1 That ' s all I have . 2 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Okay . Andy, I 3 know you have other staff or people here . 4 MR . FITZ : Yes . 5 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Is there 6 anything that they wish to address or they are 7 just here for questions? 8 MR . FITZ : They are here for 9 questions if you have any . If you ' d like them 10 to -- you know, to present what they have to 11 present , that ' s fine also, just let me know . 12 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Okay . At this 13 time I would ask if there is any comments or 14 questions from the public . 15 (No Response ) 16 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : No questions? 17 Concerns ? Issues? 18 (No Response ) 19 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Okay . With that 20 being said, I would entertain a motion then to 21 close the public hearing . 22 MR . HOLDIMAN : So moved . 23 MS . ADAMS : Second . 24 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : It ' s been moved Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 12 1 and seconded to close the public hearing . Any 2 discussion on the motion? 3 (No response ) 4 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Hearing none, 5 those in favor signify by saying aye . 6 (A Chorus of Ayes ) 7 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Opposed? 8 (No Response ) 9 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Motion passes . 10 (Which were all the 11 proceedings had in 12 public hearing . ) 13 ---000--- 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 13 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ss : 2 COUNTY OF LASALLE ) 3 4 CHRISTINE M . VITOSH, being first duly 5 sworn, on oath says that she is a Certified 6 Shorthand Reporter doing business in the State of 7 Illinois ; 8 That she reported in shorthand the 9 proceedings had at the foregoing public hearing; 10 And that the foregoing is a true and 11 correct transcript of her shorthand notes so 12 taken as aforesaid and contains all the 13 proceedings had at the said public hearing . 14 IN WITN SS WHEREOF I have hereunto set 15 my hank this day of 16 2005 . 17 18 19 ;� 20 LJI-6-6 _ --------- CH ISTINE M . VITOSH, C . S . R . 21 CSR License No . 084-002883 22 23 24 Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 Yorkville Plan Commission Multi-Page TM & -mention April 13, 2005 additional[2] 9:7,22 CHARLES[1) 2:7 entertain[1] 11:20 Hopefully[1) 5:18 -&- address[41 3:20 4:17 checked[1] 8:11 entrances[11 6:6 hour[1] 1:9 &[11 2:11 9:11 11:6 Chorus[31 3:15 7:11 12:6 evening[1] 5:4 house[11 7:10 aforesaid[11 13:12 CHRISTINE[31 1:8 everybody[11 4:13 -O- again[1] 6:17 13:4,20 example[3] 7:22,24 8:2 -I- agenda[11 5:14 City ul 1:2,10 2:14 4:3,5 except[11 9:2 Illinois[81 1:2,10 2:12 084-002883[1] 13:21 4:6 9:20 agreement[1] 9:13 Excuse[1] 7:5 2:14 4:4,12 13:1,7 _ Agricultural[1] 4:6 civil[1] 5:6 extensive[11 8:3 informed[1] 10:12 -1 allow[1) 10:20 CLARENCE[1) 2:3 input[1] 6:10 11,250[1] 10:3 allowed[11 8:12 close[21 11:21 12:1 _F_ intended[1) 8:6 11,3[1] 10:3 allowing 0:18 codes[1] 8:11 intent[1] 10:10 12,000[21 6:20 10:3 g[2] , cold[11 9:16 fall[2] 9:8 10:3 along[9] 6:14,22 7:23 8:1 far[1] 7:16 issue[3) 7:8 10:5,6 155.825[1] 4:10 8:4,20 9:4,18 10:4 comment[1] 4:23 Issues[1] 11:17 Ament[7] 4:11 5:22,23 comments[3] 9:11,12 fa 16 item[1) 5:14 _2_ 8:5 9:4,18 10:4 11:13 fast t[[1]11 8:16 Andy[31 5:1,4 11:2 Commission u] 1:1 favor[2) 3:14 12:5 20-foot[11 6:6 -J- 2005[2] 1:8 13:16 annexation[11 4:4 3:214:17 5:3 6:3,9 7:9 features[1] 7:16 2005-02[11 4:1 appeared[11 2:13 compromise[11 10:23 Fifth[11 2:11 John[3] 2:13 5:7,15 application[1] 4:2 concept[2] 6:4,8 filed[1] 4:2 Joliet[1] 7:21 _3- April[11 1:8 Concerns[1] 11:17 fine[1) 11:11 JUSTIN[1] 2:13 area[2] 5:24 7:23 Conifer[1] 4:1 first[3] 4:23 5:2 13:4 300[11 2:11 Aurora[11 8:3 consists[11 4:9 Fitz[s] 4:22 5:1,4,4 7:7 -K- 355-1458[11 2:12 Avenue[1] 2:11 contains[1] 13:12 7:14 11:4,8 keeping[1) 10:10 36[1] 7:3 aye[2] 3:14 12:5 continuation[1] 4:14 fixture[1] 8:10 Kendall[a] 4:3,5,11,12 380[1] 2:11 Ayes[31 3:15 7:11 12:6 comer[21 4:11 5:22 flat[11 5:23 KRAUPNER[1] 2:7 correct[1] 13:11 focus[1] 8:18 -4- _B_ County[a] 4:3,6,12 13:2 foliage[11 7:20 40[a] 7:3 9:20 10:19,24 Couple[31 6:6 9:11,21 follows[1) 5:3 based[11 6:9 p land[21 5:8,16 40-foot[21 6:10 10:13 course[31 6:21 7:2 10:24 foregoing[21 13:9,10 behalf[11 2:13 landscape[7] 5:8,10 6:6 below[1] 9:8 cover[1) 5:16 forward[1] 4:18 6:10 7:17 9:17,22-5- creek[1] 6:22 four[1] 7:1 landscaping[31 7:16 8:4 between[1] 7:2 13 50[3) 9:20 10:2,24 bit[2] 5:16 7:19 Crouch[31 2:6 3:7,10 four-acre[i] 6: 8:7 50-foot[21 9:17 10:4 Board[21 6:10 10:8 CSR[11 13:21 future[1] 8:6 large[1] 9:1 boulevard[11 7:17 LASALLE[11 13:2 -6- BRIAN[11 2:5 -D- _G least[1] 10:17 60563[11 2:12 brief[11 5:13 D-755505[1] 1:21 Game[1) 1:9 less[31 6:19 10:1,21 630[1] 2:12 briefly[21 6:2 9:11 delivered[11 7:9 Glyman[21 5:7,7 License[11 13:21 brighter[11 6:19 Design[11 5:8 Good[11 5:4 lighting[1] 8:9 -7- BROMBEREK[1] gn [ ] 5:10 desi er 1 Graff[1] 9:15 lights[11 5:20 7:00[1) 1:9 2:11 Development[1] 4:8 great[11 8:24 LINDBLOM[19] 2:2 buffer[s) 6:7,119:18,22 different[11 9:21 Group[1] 4:1 3:5,9,13,16,18,24 7:5,8 10:4 guess[1) 10:22 7:12 11:295,12,16,19,24 _8- dim[1] 5:19 12:4,7,9 build[11 6:24 discussed[1] 9:15 line[2] 8:23 10:14 800[11 1:9 built[1] 7:4 discussion[3) 3:10 10:7 _H LLC[1) 4:1 bump[11 10:2 12:2 hand[2] 3:22 13:15 located[i] 6:5 -9- business[1] 13:6 District[1] 4:7 [1] 10:10 happy[1] 5:17 lots[a] 6:19 9:7,24 10:8 9th[1] 4:15 done hearing[1o] 3:6,13,19 -C- doubled[1] 9:20 4:1411:21 12:1,4,1213:9 _M_ -A- C[i] 2:10 down[11 4:21 13:13 A-1 [1) 4:6 C.S.R[2) 1:8 13:20 drainage[3] 5:24 6:14 heavily[11 8:4 M[3] 1:8 13:4,20 above-entitled[1] 1:7 Cemcon[1] 5:6 8:20 HEITZ[1] 2:11 March[1] 4:15 abut[3] 6:20 9:8,24 centered[11 10:8 duly[21 5:2 13:4 held[1] 4:15 MARI-YS[1] 2:9 accept[11 3:6 centrally[1] 6:4 hereunto[1) 13:14 May [i] 1:7 access[1] 9:3 certainly 11 7:7 -E- historic[2] 8:8,9 y[ ] 5:6 y E[a] 2:1,1,10,10 historic-type[1] 8:9 medians[1] 7:17 acres[1) 4:10 Certified(1) 13:5 active[1] 8:19 Chairman[19] 2:2 3:5,9 East[1] 2:11 HOLDIMAN[21 2:3 meeting[3 ] 1:1,6 9:16 3:13,16,18,24 7:5,8,12 elevations[1] 7:3 11:22 meetings[1] 9:5 Adams[a1 2:4 3:8,10 11:23 11:2,5,12,16,19,2412:4,7 engineer[1] 5:7 homes[4] 4:1 5:5 6:24 members[11 7:9 12:9 7:4 mention[1) 4:16 Depo Court Reporting Service Index Page 1 Naperville, Illinois (630) 983-0030 Yorkville Plan Commission Multi-Page TM met- YOUNG April 13, 2005 met[1] 5:9 Power(1) 5:13 return[11 10:9 Suite(1] 2:11 YOUNG[11 2:9 Michael[2] 2:6 5:6 preliminary[2] 6:16,18 revised[11 6:8 summary[11 8:14 Mike[61 2:8 3:9 9:15,22 present[21 11:10,11 rezoning[1] 4:5 sworn[31 3:23 5:213:5 10:12,15 presentation[11 5:13 right[31 3:215:19 7:14 minimum[1] 10:23 preserved[3] 6:13 8:21 Road[11 1:9 -T- models[21 7:1,2 9:1 Roads[11 4:11 T[1] 2:1 Montalbano[21 4:15:5 preserving[2] 10:6,9 roadway[11 8:4 ten[z1 10:17,23 most[21 9:1,12 pretty[1] 6:15 ran[1] 6:1 ten-foot[11 9:22 motion[61 3:6,11,18 previous[21 6:2,3 running[31 5:24 7:23 testified[1l 5:2 11:20 12:2,9 private[1] 10:11 8:23 'Thanks[21 4:22 5:20 mouth[1] 9:23 problem[1] 7:15 thought[11 9:5 moved[41 3:7,9 11:22,24 proceed[11 4:19 _S_ throe 11 7:3 MS[4] 2:4,9 3:8 11:23 [s1 1:6 3:2 [ proceedings S[z1 2:1,10 through(s] 5:13,24 6:1 12:11 13:9,13 SANDRA[1] 2:4 8:23 9:12 -N- project[41 5:7 7:18,21 Sandy[1] 3:10 TOM[11 2:2 N[2] 2:1,10 8:2 sat[1] 4:21 tonight[21 5:6,10 name[1l 4:18 property[21 4:9 5:21 Propose[z] 6:24 7:17 says[1] 13:5 Tony[2) 9:15 10:15 Naperville[11 2:12 provide[11 10:17 SCHILLINGER[1] Township[11 4:12 necessary[11 9:6 2:5 trail[21 8:1520 need[1] 10:22 provided[2] 8:15 9:6 school[4] 6:5,13,21 8:19 public[u] 3:6,19 4:14 transcript[1] 13:11 next[21 6:12 10:8 4:23 10:14 11:14,21 12:1 Schoppe[2] 2:8 9:15 traveled[11 8:4 nice[11 8:7 12:12 13:9,13 second[41 3:8,10 7:6 tree[11 8:22 none[21 3:13 12:4 put[21 9:21,23 11:23 trees[1] 8:24 notes[1l 13:11 seconded[1l 12:1 true[1] 13:10 now[2) 3:19 10:12 _Q_ see[4] 5:18 6:19 8:6 10:15 turkey[1] 9:17 quality(1) 8:24 set[11 13:14 turn[2) 4:20 5:15 setback[11 10:14 -O- two[1] 9:5 questions[s] 5:17 11:7 oath[11 13:5 11:9,14916 shorthand[3) 13:6,8,11 type[11 6:24 offer[1] 10:23 quick(1l 6:15 show[11 6:14 one[3] 9:3,10,14 quite[21 7:19 8:3 showed[31 6:4,10,12 _U_ One-Family[1] 4:7 sidewalk[11 8:1 Unit[1] 4:8 open[a] 6:20 8:18 9:8,24 _R_ sign[11 7:19 United(1] 8:15 United[s] 1:2 2:13 4:3,4 Opposed[2) 3:16 12:7 R[21 2:1,10 4:6 P R-2[11 4:7 signify[2] 3:14 12:5 options(1) 9:21 up[3) 7:15 10:2,24 originally[21 6:4 9:19 raise[11 3:21 single-family[1) 8:15 rather[2) 8:5 9:4 site 6:5,13 7:1 8:19,19 _V_ _P_ six-acre[1] 6:12 read[11 9:12 variation[1] 10:20 P[31 2:1,10,10 real[21 4:9 9:11 Slight[1] 5:24 slightly[1) 10:1 varies[11 10:19 P.M[1] 1:9 realize[11 6:15 smaller[1] 10:8 vary[il 10:24 park[41 6:4,12,20 8:19 really[21 8:7 10:15 village[21 8:11 10:7 :9 7:13 part[3] 9:13 10:6,6 record[11 4:18 21 5:9 VITOSH[31 1:8 13:4,20 south sorry[z1 passes[21 3:18 12:9 reduced[1l 9:3 southeast:7 4:10 5:22 _ path[s] 6:14,217:23 9:2 related[1] 10:15 space[4] 6:20 8:18 9:9 _w 10:5,9,11,14 remember[1l 8:17 9:24 WHEREOF vi 13:14 PC[11 3:24 remind[11 4:13 Springs[11 7:18 Willow[11 7:18 Penman[s] 4:11 5:22,23 repeat[11 3:22 ss[1) 13:1 wish[1) 11:6 8:5 9:4 REPORT[11 1:6 people[1] 11:3 staff[31 6:9 9:5 11:3 wishes[1] 3:20 reported[2] 3:4 13:8 Staff's[11 9:12 wishing[1] 4:17 petitioners[11 4:2 Reporter[11 13:6 stand[11 3:21 WITNESS[1] 13:14 place[1] 6:21 representative[1] 6:23 plan[s) 1:1 5:3,16 6:4,9 p standard[11 10:2 Witnesses[11 3:23 plan[8 1: request[1] 9:17 standards[11 10:13 words[11 9:23 Planned[1] 4:8 requested[11 9:20 State(3] 4:18 13:1,6 WYETH[21 2:11,13 planner[11 it 5 8 4 requesting[1) 4:4 street[1] 8:9 Point(1] require[1) 10:13 stub[11 9:7 -Y- Residence[11 4:7 subdivision[1l 8:16 points[1] 10:18 yellow[11 6:19 policy[1) 10:1 response 3:12,17 submittals[1) 6:2 Yorkville[6] 1:2,10 2:14 pond[21 7:22,24 11:15,18 12:2:3,8 submitted[11 6:9 4:3,5,7 Depo Court Reporting Service Index Page 2 Naperville, Illinois (630) 983-0030 PLEASE SIGN IN MEETING: plan � ��'ss ;a.n DATE: ea ar , 1 I3 a v©6- NAME BUSINESS PHONE # or omc- ,d dns.r ; r s -- ; L- k�o A,i�c. �c-v �. �'l SwkVoo 1r^r 6oc/g -,rzggp All MU. �b o v- - gar Dt C ��Z �3� X18 3 ���0 zf7 L5 W;I&A I/5L -e�5S6' �c�0 S ��►� �lQ MICK, &i 36 L 0 yd6 30-76 Igic.hol `(rays,/ Mor,)rA�Wliv 63(-) - g/- Ya7o 14. C0,1