Loading...
Plan Commission Minutes 2005 11-09-05 Page 1 of 4 APPROVED 2/8/06 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLAN COMMISSION YORKVILLE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS WEDNESDAY,NOVEMBER 9,2005 Chairman Tom Lindblom called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Charles Kraupner, Sandra Adams, Clarence Holdiman, Michael Crouch and Tom Lindblom. Members absent: Anne Lucietto,Bill Davis, Brian Schillinger and Jack Jones. A quorum was established. CITY STAFF AND VISITORS Mayor Art Prochaska; City Planner Mike Schoppe; City Attorney John Wyeth; John Whitehouse, Engineering Enterprises, Inc.; Bill Dunn, Engineering Enterprises Inc.; Tony Scott, Kendall County Record; Dennis Austin; Identa Austin; Chuck Brooks; Lynn Dubajic, YEDC; Tedd Lundquist; David Knott; Janice Van Ripen; Gregg Ingemunson; Charlotte Morris; Donald Morris; Jennie Liefheit; Lee Thompson; Kelly Kramer; attorney Jim Olguin; attorney Patti Bernhard; and Scott Mai, Smith Engineering. MINUTES Minutes from the Aug. 10, 2005 Plan Commission were unanimously approved by voice vote. Commissioner Clarence Holdiman made the motion to approve the minutes. Commissioner Sandra Adams seconded the motion. Commissioner Michael Crouch made a motion to open the public hearings. Adams seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by voice vote. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PC 2005-51 Janice Van Riper,Donald and Charlotte Morris; James and Lynn Hall, petitioners, application to rezone. See attached. Crouch made a motion to close the public hearing. Commissioner Charles Kraupner seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved in a voice vote. NEW BUSINESS 1. PC 2005-51 Janice Van Riper,Donald and Charlotte Morris; James and Lynn Hall, petitioners, application to rezone. Page 2 of 4 Crouch said his biggest concern about the request to rezone is that R-3 zoning would surround the property in question Eventually,he said, there will be businesses all along Route 47, but at this point,rezoning one parcel would be akin to spot zoning. Lindblom pointed out that there are two parcels of residential property between this parcel and the next one with business zoning. Holdiman also said the request seemed like one for spot zoning. Kraupner made a motion to recommend approval to rezone PC 2005-51 as requested. Adams seconded the motion. The motion failed in a 2-3 vote. Kraupner and Crouch voted yes. Holdiman,Adams and Lindblom voted no. 2. PC 2005-49 Oak Grove Subdivision— 1 % Mile Review Attorney Kelly Kramer, representing the petitioners, said the proposed subdivision is a 28 lot single-family development along High Point Road. The proposed development abuts the Tanglewood Subdivision. She said final plat is in conformance with the preliminary plat, which was approved a year ago. City Planner Mike Schoppe said the proposed use is consistent with the guidelines in the city's estate district. And, if the property was ever annexed to the city, it would be consistent with city standards,he said. Engineering consultant John Whitehouse said city engineer Joe Wywrot reviewed this project and said all of the concerns seem minor and should be resolved without issue. Wywrot did suggest that Long Grove Road be rerouted. In his comments, he suggested that the intersection of Long Grove Road and Highpoint Road should be at least 400 feet from the Tanglewood Trails Drive intersection. The proposed distance is about 290 feet. However, Kramer said the plan as it stands is already in process with the county and she said the developer intents to continue with the plan as it stands. Holdiman made a motion to recommend approval of the 1 %2-mile review for PC 2005- 49 per the engineering recommendations. Crouch seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved 5-0 in a roll call vote. Kraupner,Holdiman, Adams, Crouch and Lindblom voted yes. 3. PC 2005-16 Kendallwood Estates—Preliminary Plan Patti Bernhard representing Kendall Land Development said the proposed development is located on Route 126 south of Van Emmon Road between Routes 71 and 47. The property consists of 51.56 acres. Plans are to build 94 single-family homes on the property with an overall density of 1.82 units per acre. The density would be in compliance with the city's R-2 standards. The minimum lot size would be 12, 000 square Page 3 of 4 feet. The proposed setbacks are 30 feet in the front, 10 feet on the side and 40 feet in the back, she said. The property is a unique parcel in that it is narrow with a lot of trees, Bernhard said. The plan for development was designed in a way to preserve as many trees and natural features as possible. There's access to Route 126,there's also a reserved lot, which would be used as access to the south if that were ever developed. There's also a stub to the east, she said. Also, she said the developer purchased additional acreage to the north so that there's access to Van Emmon Road. Adams said her main concern is the one-way out issue, but it does help that the property to the north has been purchased. For storm water, a detention area is planned on the western side of the property. Scott Mai, with Smith Engineering, said engineers are working with city staff on the storm water issue. Since it's a very steep, wooded site, Mai said they want to come up with some natural detention to slow the water down. He said they'd like to do that without cutting down any trees. He added that wetlands on the property wouldn't be touched. Lindblom said with all of the outstanding engineering issues, it might be too premature for the Plan Commission to take a vote on the request. Crouch agreed. He said there seems to be some major engineering concerns in terms of water detention. Whitehouse commended that there are some issues, but he's not saying they can't overcome them. The methods and exact locations need to be determined before preliminary plat approval, he said. The storm water plan almost has to be in its final state before the preliminary plan should be approved, Whitehouse added. Lindblom told Bernhard the petitioners are on the right road. He said he likes the plan, however,there are just too many issues unresolved. Lindblom asked the Bernhard if the petitioners would be willing to table the preliminary plan approval pending the resolution of the engineering issues. Bernhard said she'd be agreeable to tabling the request for one month. Crouch made a motion to table PC 2005-16. Adams seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved in a 5-0 roll call vote. Adams, Crouch, Kraupner, Holdiman and Lindblom voted yes. 4. PC 2005-53 Hudson Lakes—Concept Plan Jim Olguin representing Kendall Creek Development LLC said the proposed development is on 141 acres south of Raintree Village and would need to be annexed and rezoned. Page 4 of 4 Tedd Lundquist with SEC Planning said the area is surrounded mostly by single-family residences in suburban neighborhoods with R-2 zoning. The plans comply with the city's comprehensive plan updates. The proposal is to build 255 single-family units with a density of 1.8 units per acre. The developer isn't seeking any variances, Lundquist said. Meanwhile,the proposed minimum lot size is 12,000 square feet with a maximum lot size of 28,000 square feet and an average lot size of 14,000 square feet. The main issue, Lundquist said, is the extension on Penman Road. He said there's a small wetland area that they don't want to disturb. Crouch said if the main thoroughfare is Penman Road,there needs to be a more direct route to the proposed school site nearby. He also said the developer should work with the School District to discuss the proposed school site. Unfortunately,people look at the school site study the city recently conducted and wrongly assume there will be sites at all of the proposed locations. If the planned school site north of this property isn't viable,he said the developers might need to talk to school officials. Olguin said he's already met with the school district officials. Adams commented that the park areas seem to small for the size of the proposed development. Olguin said the developers planned to speak to the Park Board the following evening. However, initial conversations with the park board showed that they're agreeable to the amount of land already reserved. Schoppe said immediately north of the property is a 7-acre school site. Southeast of the property is a school/park site. With those park areas planned,he said there should be adequate park space to serve residents of the proposed development. As for the general layout of the proposed development, Plan Commissioners gave their informal approval. Lindblom said he likes that the lot sizes are varied. Crouch made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Kraupner seconded the motion. The motion was approved unanimously in a voice vote. The meeting was adjourned at 9 p.m. Minutes respectfully submitted by Dina Gipe PLAN COMMISSION MEETING UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE , ILLINOIS REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had at the meeting of the above-entitled matter taken before CHRISTINE M . VITOSH, C . S . R . , on November 9 , 2005 , at the hour of 7 : 00 p . m. , at 800 Game Farm Road, in the City of Yorkville , Illinois . D-777005 REPO • COURT reporting service 800 West Fifth Avenue • Suite 203C • Naperville, IL 60563 • 630-983-0030 • Fax 630-983-6013 www.depocourt.com 2 1 P R E S E N T : 2 MR . TOM LINDBLOM, Chairman; 3 MR . CLARENCE HOLDIMAN; 4 MS . SANDRA ADAMS ; 5 MR . CHARLES KRAUPPNER; 6 MR . MICHAEL CROUCH; 7 MR . BRIAN SCHILLINGER; 8 MR . MIKE SCHOPPE ; 9 MS . DINA GIPE . 10 A P P E A R A N C E S : 11 WYETH, HEITZ & BROMBEREK 300 East Fifth Avenue , Suite 380 12 Naperville , Illinois 60563 ( 630 ) 355-1458 13 BY : MR . JOHN JUSTIN WYETH, appeared on behalf of the United 14 City of Yorkville , Illinois . 15 16 - - - - - 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 3 1 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : At this time I 2 would entertain a motion to go to public hearing . 3 MR CROUCH : So moved . 4 MS . ADAMS : Second . 5 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Moved and 6 seconded . Discussion on the motion? 7 (No Response ) 8 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Hearing none , 9 those in favor signify by saying aye . 10 (A Chorus of Ayes ) 11 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Opposed? 12 (No Response ) 13 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : That motion 14 passes . 15 At this time then I would ask 16 anybody that wishes to address the Commission to 17 raise -- stand and raise your hand and repeat the 18 oath after me . 19 (Witnesses sworn) 20 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Thank you . The 21 item for public hearing is PC 2005-51 , Janice Van 22 Riper? 23 MR . INGEMUNSON : That ' s correct . 24 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Riper, Donald Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 4 1 and Charlotte Morris , and James and Lynn Hall , 2 Petitioners , have filed an application with the 3 United City of Yorkville , Kendall County, 4 Illinois , requesting rezoning from the United 5 City of Yorkville R-3 General Residence District 6 to the United City of Yorkville B-1 Limited 7 Business District . g The real property is located at 9 708-710 North Bridge Street , Yorkville , Kendall .10 County, Illinois . 11 Gregg, you speak for the 12 petitioner? 13 MR . INGEMUNSON : That ' s right . 14 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Gregg 15 Ingemunson . 16 WHEREUPON : 17 GREGG INGEMUNSON, 18 having been first duly sworn, testified before 19 the Yorkville Plan Commission as follows : 20 MR . INGEMUNSON : What we would like 21 to do, there is three duplexes located on Route 22 47 , they are all white , just south of the old 23 Brenner building . I ' m sure everyone is familiar 24 with where that is at . Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 5 1 We are seeking to rezone the 2 middle duplex to B-1 for an office space . My 3 client , Janice Van Riper , is -- was in the 4 insurance industry, and that ' s what would be in 5 that -- in that -- in that building at the 6 outset . 7 I think there is about 4 , 000 8 square feet . She has 1500 square feet she will 9 use and then later down the road she will get 10 another tenant to use the remaining space . 11 There is -- As you can see on 12 the outlay that you have , there will be ten 13 spaces , including handicapped, and what ' s not 14 shown on here , there is a four-car garage , there 15 is four spaces in there, and two of which will be 16 available also immediately after -- after we 17 hopefully rezone the parcel , so we have a total 18 at the outset of 12 spaces . 19 And there is a shared driveway, 20 between Lot 2 and Lot 3 there is a shared 21 driveway, and the owners of the southern piece , 22 Junior Brett Horton, have also kind of 23 expected -- expressed interest in rezoning their 24 piece , which they have not done yet , but they Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 6 1 have expressed interest in doing that . So 1 2 don ' t anticipate any objection from the Hortons 3 relative to our petition . 4 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : I ' m sorry, which 5 lot do Hortons have? 6 MR . INGEMUNSON : Lot 3 . 7 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Lot 3 . 8 MR . INGEMUNSON : Yeah . They have 9 the duplex just to the south of the one we are 10 seeking to rezone . So that ' s it in a nutshell . 11 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Okay . Very 12 good . Thank you . 13 At this point then I would ask 14 if anybody in the audience has any questions or 15 concerns on this piece of property . 16 WHEREUPON : 17 IDENTA AUSTIN, 18 having been first duly sworn, testified before 19 the Yorkville Plan Commission as follows : 20 MS . AUSTIN : I am Identa Austin . I 21 live at 712 North Bridge , and I am the 22 beneficiary of that duplex, 712-714 North Bridge , 23 which is the north part of that property . 24 I , first of all , would like to Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 1 inquire what are the possibilities for that 2 zoning . What could we expect there if that area 3 is rezoned? Shall I address -- 4 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : We will answer 5 that for you . 6 MS . AUSTIN : -- one thing at time? 7 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Okay . Sure . 8 Mike , would you want to -- 9 MR . SCHOPPE : If you give me a 10 minute , I will turn open the zoning ordinance for 11 the B-2 and describe the type of land uses that 12 this would allow . 13 MR . INGEMUNSON : It will be B-l . 14 MS . AUSTIN : B-1 ? Okay . 15 MR . SCHOPPE : It ' s B-1? 16 MR . WYETH : Yeah . The exhibit says 17 B-2 , Gregg, so -- 18 MR . INGEMUNSON : I think it ' s B- 1 . 19 MR . SCHOPPE : Let ' s go with B- 1 . 20 The application is B-1 , okay . B-1 is the latest 21 commercial district that the city has . It allows 22 for the least intense commercial uses , but I will 23 read through a couple of the land uses . 24 Most of them are retail and Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 8 1 office-related uses . For example , antique sale , 2 bakery, barber shop , book store , diner, a church, 3 a community center, florist sales , a health food 4 store , ice cream shop , jewelry -- a jewelry shop , 5 a meat market , medical clinic, a funeral home , 6 photography studio , post office , professional 7 building, doctor, lawyers , accounting office , 8 restaurant , shoe repair, indoor swimming pool , 9 tennis clubs , those types of activities . That ' s 10 about -- what I just read was about 75 percent of 11 the allowable land uses in the B-1 . 12 MS . AUSTIN : Then the other -- the 13 other point that I want to ask about will be the 14 parking that is involved in connection with that 15 business . 16 You see , there is kind of a 17 complication as far as our drives and so forth 18 where those three duplexes are concerned, and, 19 for example, in the plat , the line between the 20 property of 708 and 710 North Bridge , and the 21 duplex in which I live , the line is about the 22 middle of that drive , and from there out -- it 23 goes at an angle out to the street . 24 And I am wondering if parking Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 9 1 would be involved in my drive there , and the 2 other part of that drive where I live . That ' s my 3 other concern . 4 MR . INGEMUNSON : Do you want me to 5 address that , Tom? 6 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Let Mike , then 7 we will let Gregg respond . 8 MR . SCHOPPE : Before I answer that I 9 need to clarify . You live at the duplex -- 10 MS . AUSTIN : I live and I am the 11 beneficiary of the trust that owns that property 12 at 712-714 North Bridge , the north duplex . 13 MR . SCHOPPE : The north duplex . 14 MS . AUSTIN : Yes . 15 MR . SCHOPPE : So you are immediately 16 north of this property . 17 MS . AUSTIN : I am north of this 18 property . 19 MR . SCHOPPE : In the map that we 20 have I can see that there is a driveway . The 21 driveway that comes in I am assuming comes in to 22 serve your property -- 23 MS . AUSTIN : It serves all three 24 properties . Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 10 1 MR . SCHOPPE : -- as well as the 2 properties immediately south of you . 3 MS . AUSTIN : It serves , yes , all 4 three duplexes , it serves . 5 MR . SCHOPPE : And I am assuming 6 there is an easement placed on the property that 7 allows you and your neighbors to use the same 8 driveway . 9 MS . AUSTIN : Yes . 10 MR . SCHOPPE : That ' s an assumption 11 on my part . 12 MS . AUSTIN : And we paid expenses on 13 that note . 14 MR . SCHOPPE : Of course they are 15 asking for rezoning tonight , they are not asking 16 for any site plan approval , as I understand it . 17 If the property were to be 18 rezoned and any redevelopment to take place or 19 change in use , they would have to file a site 20 plan, and the issues like parking would be 21 reviewed to see that there is adequate parking . 22 Generally speaking, the 23 easement probably runs with the property, so any 24 new owner of Lot 2 , of this property, would have Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 i1 1 access rights to travel across the same easement 2 that ' s in place today, and through the city ' s 3 site plan review process , we would review it to 4 see that any parking on the property would be 5 consistent with the city ' s ordinances . 6 Does that answer your question? 7 MS . AUSTIN : Well , to that point , 8 yes . 9 MR . SCHOPPE : Okay . 10 MS . AUSTIN : Then the other point 11 that I want to ask about , is this considered spot 12 zoning? 13 MR . SCHOPPE : I would -- We 14 haven ' t -- The city hasn ' t asked us to do a 15 review on the zoning of this property, so before 16 I would be able to comment on that I would have 17 to do a zoning review on that point . 18 MS . AUSTIN : Because nothing on 19 either side is -- 20 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : I was going to 21 say, Mike , it is my understanding there is not 22 anything contiguous to this that is zoned in the 23 business category . 24 MS . AUSTIN : That is my Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 12 1 understanding, that there isn ' t anything at this 2 point . Thank you . 3 MR . SCHOPPE : Thank you . 4 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Gregg, did you 5 have anything to add to that? 6 MR . INGEMUNSON : I would just -- On 7 our sketch , we don ' t have this , but parking, here 8 is Lot 2 , where we are at , and you guys are up 9 here on Lot 1 . 10 MS . AUSTIN : No, I am in 3 . 11 MR . INGEMUNSON : Oh . No, this is -- 12 you are up -- 13 MS . AUSTIN : Is this south? 14 MR . INGEMUNSON : This is north here . 15 You guys are Lot 1 . Here is 47 . 16 MS . AUSTIN : Oh . 17 MR . INGEMUNSON : You are right . 18 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Gregg, we ' ve got 19 a problem with the reporter picking this up . 20 MS . AUSTIN : There is a line right 21 through there . 22 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Let ' s make it -- 23 Would you address it to the Commission and please 24 listen to what he ' s saying? This way we can pick Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 13 1 it up, this back and forth back and forth . 2 MR . INGEMUNSON : Lot 1 is the 3 line -- the lot line between Lots 1 and 2 4 essentially is in the middle of the driveway, and 5 all of our parking we have proposed will be south 6 all on our property . 7 There will be no parking 8 located within the current asphalt that exists 9 out there . 10 MS . AUSTIN : In the front of the 11 building . 12 MR . INGEMUNSON : In the front of the 13 building, yes . 14 MS . AUSTIN : The parking will be at 15 the back, which won ' t concern me at all , because 16 I am over here . 17 MR . INGEMUNSON : Well , yeah . 18 MS . AUSTIN : They have to come 19 around here . 20 MR . INGEMUNSON : The parking will be 21 towards 47 and then behind the building . There 22 won ' t be any parking on the side of the lot 23 facing you . 24 In fact , we have landscape Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 14 1 bushes depicted on the plat , it would be between 2 the parking and your lot . In other words -- 3 WHEREUPON : 4 DENNIS AUSTIN , 5 having been first duly sworn, testified before 6 the Yorkville Plan Commission as follows : 7 MR . AUSTIN : There is enough area 8 right here . 9 MS . AUSTIN : This is all building . 10 This is the part right in here that I am 11 wondering about , is there going to be parking 12 allowed . 13 MR . INGEMUNSON : We don ' t have -- 14 See , right here , we have parking right here . 15 This is the parking we have , directly adjacent to 16 the building, rather than out immediately -- 17 well , we have in the behind building towards the 18 south and east in the very back, which is facing 19 the southern duplex . There is no parking on the 20 shared asphalt access drive . 21 MS . AUSTIN : That ' s what I was 22 concerned about . Okay . That answers my 23 question . 24 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Anything else? Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 15 1 MR . INGEMUNSON : That ' s it . 2 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Any other 3 comments from the public regarding this petition? 4 (No Response ) 5 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Hearing none , I 6 would entertain a motion then to close the public 7 hearing . 8 MR . CROUCH : So moved . 9 MR . KRAUPPNER : Second . 10 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Moved and 11 seconded . Is there any discussion on the motion? 12 (No Response ) 13 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Hearing none , 14 those in favor signify by saying aye . 15 (A Chorus of Ayes ) 16 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : Opposed? 17 (No Response ) 18 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM : The public 19 hearing is now closed . 20 (WHEREUPON, 21 proceedings were had 22 which were not 23 reported . ) 24 ---000--- Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 16 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ss : 2 COUNTY OF LASALLE ) 3 4 CHRISTINE M . VITOSH, being first duly 5 sworn, on oath says that she is a Certified 6 Shorthand Reporter doing business in the State of 7 Illinois ; 8 That she reported in shorthand the 9 proceedings had at the foregoing public hearing; 10 And that the foregoing is a true and 11 correct transcript of her shorthand notes so 12 taken as aforesaid and contains all the 13 proceedings had at the said public hearing . 14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set 15 my hand this day of 16 -- � , 2005 . 17 18 19 CHRIS INE M . VITOSH, C . S . R . 21 CSR License No . 084 -002883 22 23 24 Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983-0030 Yorkville Plan Commission Multi-Page & - land November 9, 2005 angle pi 8:23 change pi 10:19 drives[11 8:17 Gregg[7] 4:11,14,17 7:17 -&- answer[31 7:4 9:8 11:6 CHARLES[1] 2:5 driveway[61 5:19,21 9:7 12:4,18 &[11 2:11 answers[il 14:22 Charlotte[11 4:1 9:20,21 10:8 13:4 guys[z] 12:8,15 anticipate[11 6:2 Chorus[21 3:10 15:15 duly[4] 4:18 6:18 14:5 -0- antique[i] 8:1 CHRISTINE[3l 1:8 16:4 -H- a eared 2:13 16:4,20 duplex[81 5:2 6:9,22 Hall[11 4:1 084-002883[1] 16:21 appeared 8:21 9:9,12,13 14:19 application[2] 4:2 7:20 church[1] 8:2 hand[2] 3:17 16:15 approval[il 10:16 city[81 1:2,10 2:14 4:3,5 duplexes[31 4:21 8:18 10:4 handicapped[il 5:13 4:6 7:21 11:14 -1- area[2] 7:2 14:7 health[il 8:3 1500[11 5:8 asphalt[21 13:8 14:20 city's[z] 11:2,5 -E- hearing[91 3:2,8,21 15:5 assumin g[21 9:21 10:5 CLARENCE[il 2:3 15:7,13,19 16:9,13 -2- assumption[il 10:10 clarify[i1 9:9 E[4] 2:1,1,10,10 HEITZ[11 2:11 23 6 [31 10: , 2005[zl 1:8 16:16 client[i1 5:3 casement hereunto[il 16:14 audience[tl 6:14 11:1 2005-51 [i1 3:21 Austin[281 6:17,20,20 clinic[i1 5: east[21 2:11 14:18 HOLDIMAN[i1 2:3 7:6,14 8:12 9:10,14,17,23 close[i1 15:6 home[11 8:5 10:3,9,1211:7,10,18,24 closed[11 15:19 enher[�1 [21 3 -3- entertain[zl 3:2 15:6 hopefully[i] 5:17 12:10,13,16,20 13:10,14 clubs[il 8:9 Horton[11 5:22 300[il 2:11 13:18 14:4,7,9,21 essentially[il 13:4 355-1458[11 2:12 available 7, 5:16 comments comment[i1 11:16 example[21 8:1,19 Hortons[21 6:2,5 380[11 2:11 Avenue[1] 2:11 7: hour[i1 1:9 commercial l[21] 7:21,22 exhibit[11 7:16 aye[21 3:9 15:14 Commission[6] 1:1 exists[1] 13:8 -I- -4- Ayes[21 3:10 15:15 3:16 4:19 6:19 12:23 14:6 expect[i1 7:2 4,000[il 5:7 community[11 8:3 expected[il 5:23 ice[1] 8:4 47[3] 4:22 12:15 13:21 -B- complication[11 8:17 expenses[i] 10:12 Identa[2] 6:17,20 B-1 pol 4:6 5:2 7:13,14 concern[2] 9:3 13:15 expressed[21 5:23 6:1 Illinois[s] 1:2,10 2:12 -6- 7:15,18,19,20,20 8:11 2:14 4:4,10 16:1,7 concerned[zl 8:18 immediately[41 5:16 60563[il 2:12 B-2[21 7:11,17 14:22 -F- 9:15 10:2 14:16 630[il 2:12 bakery[1] 8:2 concerns[il 6:15 facing[21 13:23 14:18 including[1] 5:13 barber[11 8:2 connection[i1 8:14 fact pi 13:24 indoor[11 8:8 -7- behalf[il 2:13 considered[i1 11:11 familiar[il 4:23 industry[11 5:4 708[il 8:20 behind[21 13:21 14:17 consistent[il 11:5 far[i] 8:17 In g emunson[2ol 3:23 708-710[i] 4:9 beneficiary[21 6:22 contains[11 16:12 Farm[il 1:9 4:13,15,17,20 6:6,8 7:13 9:11 contiguous[l] 11:22 favor[2] 3:9 15:14 7:18 9:4 12:6,11,14,17 710[1] 8:20 between[41 5:20 8:19 13:2,12,17,20 14:13 15:1 712[il 6:21 correct[21 3:23 16:11 feet[21 5:8,8 13:3 14:1 County :3,10 16:2 inquire[11 7:1 712-714[21 6:22 9:12 �[3l Fifth[il 2:11 book[i1 8:2 couple[il 7:23 file[l] 10:19 insurance[11 5:4 75[1] 8:10 Brenner[il 4:23 course[i] 10:14 filed[il 4:2 intense[i] 7:22 7:00[11 1:9 Brett[il 5:22 interest[21 5:23 6:1 cream[il 8:4 first[s] 4:18 6:18,24 14:5 BRIAN[11 2:7 CROUCH[3l 2:6 3:3 16:4 involved[21 8:14 9:1 -8- Bridge[sl 4:9 6:21,22 15:8 florist[11 8:3 issues[1] 10:20 800[i] 1:9 8:20 9:12 CSR[il 16:21 item[i1 3:21 BROMBEREK[il follows[31 4:19 6:19 2:11 Current[il 13:8 14:6 -A- food[11 8:3 _J_ building[9] 4: 5:5 8:7 able[il 11:16 -D- fore Oin z 1 , 13:11,13,21 14:9,,16,17 g g[ 1 6 9 10 James[11 4:1 above-entitled[11 1:7 bushes[1] 14:1 D-777005[ii 1:21 forth[3] 8:17 13:1,1 Janice[21 3:21 5:3 access[2] 11:1 14:20 business[41 4:7 8:15 DENNIS[11 14:4 four[il 5:15 jewelry[21 8:4,4 accounting pi 8:7 11:23 16:6 depicted pi 14:1 four-carpi 5:14 JOHN[il 2:13 activities[11 8:9 describe[il 7:11 front[21 13:10,12 Junior pi 5:22 ADAMS[2] 2:4 3:4 -C- DINA[il 2:9 funeral[il 8:5 JUSTIN[11 2:13 add[11 12:5 C[il 2:10 diner[1] 8:2 address[41 3:16 7:3 9:5 C.S.R.[2] 1:8 16:20 directly[i1 14:15 -G- -x- 12:23 category[il 11:23 discussion[21 3:6 15:11 Game U1 1:9 Kendall[21 4:3,9 adequate[11 10:21 center[l] 8:3 district[3] 4:5,7 7:21 garage[il 5:14 adjacent[il 14:15 g g kind[zl 5:22 8:16 aforesaid i 4:15 Certified[i1 16:5 doctor pl 8:7 General[i] 4:5 KRAUPPNER[2] 2:5 allow[ll 7:12 Chairman[261 2:2 3:1,5 Donald[11 3:24 Generally[1] 10:22 15:9 3:8,11,13,20,24 4:14 6:4 done[11 5:24 GIPE[i1 2:9 allowable[11 8:11 6:7,11 7:4,7 9:6 11:20 down[11 5:9 goes[11 8:23 -I-' allowed[11 14:12 12:4,18,22 14:24 15:2,5 allows[zl 7:21 10:7 15:10,13,16,18 drive[4] 8:22 9:1,2 14:20 good[i] 6:12 land[31 7:11,23 8:11 Depo Court Reporting Service Index Page 1 Naperville, Illinois (630) 983-0030 Yorkville Plan Commission Multi-Page`M landscape - zoning November 9, 2005 landscape[i1 13:24 nutshell[i1 6:10 13:6 seconded[z1 3:615:11 trust[11 9:11 LASALLE[i1 16:2 proposed[i1 13:5 See[61 5:118:16 9:20 turn[11 7:10 latest[11 7:20 -O- public[71 3:2,2115:3,6 10:2111:4 14:14 two[l] 5:15 lawyers[i1 8:7 oath[21 3:18 16:5 15:18 16:9,13 seeking[2] 5:1 6:10 type pi 7:11 least[i] 7:22 objection[11 6:2 serve p] 9:22 types[11 8:9 License[il 16:21 Office[3] 5:2 8:6,7 -Q- serves[31 9:23 10:3,4 Limited[1] 4:6 office-related[11 8:1 Questions[1] 6:14 set[i1 16:14 _U_ LINDBLOM[261 2:2 old[i1 4:22 Shall[1] 7:3 understand[1] 10:16 3:1,5,8,11,13,20,24 4:14 -R- shared[31 5:19,20 14:20 United[51 1:2 2:13 4:3,4 6:4,7,117:4,7 9:6 11:20 one[z1 6:9 7:6 open[ ] 7:10 R[21 2:1,10 shoe[11 8:8 4:6 12:4,18,22 14:24 15:2,5 shop[3] 8:2,4,4 u [4] 12:8,12,19 13:1 15:10,13,16,18 Opposed[21 3:11 15:16 R-3[i1 4:5 shorthand[31 16:6,8,11 P line[5] 8:19,21 12:20 13:3 ordinance[11 7:10 raise[21 3:17,17 uses[s1 7:11,22,23 8:1,11 shown[1l 5:14 13:3 ordinances[11 11:5 rather[11 14:16 1 listen[1] 12:24 outlay[i1 5:12 read[21 7:23 8:10 side[z1 11:19 15:1 _V_ live[s1 6:21 8:21 9:2,9 outset[21 5:6,18 real[11 4:8 signify[21 3:9 15:14 Van[21 3:21 5:3 9:10 site[3] 10:16,19 11:3 owner[11 10:24 redevelopment[il sketch[i1 12:7 VITOSH[31 1:8 16:4,20 located[31 4:8,21 13:8 10:18 owners[i1 5:21 Lots[i1 13:3 owns[11 9:11 regarding[11 15:3 sorry[1] 6:4 _w_ Lynn[i1 4:1 relative[11 6:3 south[61 4:22 6:9 10:2 12:13 13:5 14:18 WHEREOF[11 16:14 _P_ remaining[i1 5:10 white[il 4:22 -M- air[i1 8:8 southern[21 5:21 14:19 P[31 2:1,10,10 repair wishes pi 3:16 M[3] 1:8 16:4,20 repeat[i1 3:17 space[21 5:2,10 p.m[i1 1:9 spaces[31 5:13,15,18 within[i1 13:8 paid[ll 10:12 speak[i1 4:11 map[i1 9:19 REPORT[i1 1:6 WITNESS[i1 16:14 parcel[11 5:17 speaking[i1 10:22 market[i1 8:5 reported[21 15:23 16:8 Witnesses[i1 3:19 matter[1] 1:7 reporter[21 12:19 16:6 derin parking[161 8:14,24 spot[�1 11:11 won g[z ] 8:24 meat[i1 8:5 10:20,21 11:4 12:7 13:5,7 requesting[11 4:4 14:11 medical[1] 8:5 13:14,20,22 14:2,11,14 Residence[il 4:5 square : 1 5:8,8 words[11 14:2 meeting[21 1:1,6 14:15,19 respond[i1 9:7 ss n [1] 3:17 WYETH[31 2:11,13 MICHAEL[11 2:6 part[41 6:23 9:2 10:11 Response[51 3:7,12 15:4 stand[i1 7:16 middle[31 5:2 8:22 13:4 14:10 15:12,17 State[21 16:1,6 Mike[41 2:8 7:8 9:6 Passes[1] 3:14 restaurant[11 8:8 store[2] 8:2,4 _Y_ 11:21 PC[1] 3:21 retail[i1 7:24 street[21 4:9 8:23 percent[i1 8:10 studio[ll 8:6 yet[i1 5:24 minute[i1 7:10 P review[41 11:3,3,15,17 Yorkville poi 1:2,10 Morris[i] 4:1 petition[21 6:3 15:3 reviewed[1] 10:21 Suite[i1 2:11 2:14 4:3,5,6,9,19 6:19 Most[1] 7:24 petitioner[il 4:12 rezone[3] 5:1,17 6:10 swimming[1] 8:8 14:6 motion[51 3:2,6,13 15:6 Petitioners[ll 4:2 rezoned[21 7:3 10:18 sworn[s1 3:19 4:18 6:18 15:11 photography[il 8:6 rezoning[31 4:4 5:23 14:5 16:5 _Z_ moved[41 3:3,5 15:8,10 pick[11 12:24 10:15 zoned[il 11:22 MS[27] 2:4,9 3:4 6:20 7:6 picking[11 12:19 right[7] 4:13 12:17,20 zoning[5] 7:2,10 11:12 7:14 8:12 9:10,14,17,23 piece[31 5:21,24 6:15 14:8,10,14,14 T[i1 2:1 11:15,17 10:3,9,12 11:7,10,18,24 place[21 10:18 11:2 rights[i1 11:1 ten[11 5:12 12:10,13,16,20 13:10,14 Ri er 3 13:18 14:9,21 placed[11 10:6 p [ ] 3:22,24 5:3 tenant[i1 5:10 plan[71 1:1 4:19 6:19 road[21 1:9 5:9 tennis[11 8:9 _N- 10:16,20 11:3 14:6 Route[i1 4:21 testified[31 4:18 6:18 plat[21 8:19 14:1 runs[il 10:23 14:5 N[z1 2:1,10 point[6] 6:13 8:13 11:7 Thank[41 3:20 6:12 12:2 Naperville[11 2:12 11:10,17 12:2 -S- 12:3 need[i1 9:9 pool[i1 8:8 three[4] 4:21 8:18 9:23 neighbors[i1 10:7 possibilities[1] 7:1 sale[11 8:1 2:1,10 8:1 10:4 s new[il 10:24 post[1] 8:6 g [ ] 7:23 11:2 through 3 none[31 3:815:5,13 problem[i1 12:19 sales[il 8:3 12:21 north[u1 4:9 6:21,22,23 proceedings[41 1:6 SANDRA[11 2:4 today[il 11:2 z s 8:20 9:12,12,13,16,17 15:21 16:9,13 says[ l 7:16 16:5 Tom[21 2:2 9:5 12:14 process[1] 11:3 SCHILLINGER[i1 tonight[i] 10:15 note[i1 10:13 total[il 5:17 professional[i1 8:6 SCHOPPE[isl 2:8 7:9 notes[il 16:11 towards[21 13:21 14:17 properties[21 9:24 10:2 7:15,19 9:8,13,15,19 10:1 nothing[i1 11:18 Property[151 4:86:15 10:5,10,1411:9,1312:3 transcript[i1 16:11 Novemberul 1:8 6:238:209:11,16,18,22 Second[2] 3:415:9 travel[i] 11:1 now[11 15:19 10:6,17,23,24 11:4,15 true[il 16:10 Depo Court Reporting Service Index Page 2 Naperville, Illinois (630) 983-0030