Loading...
Plan Commission Minutes 2001 10-24-01 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL & PLAN COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 24, 2001 7:00 PM ATTENDEES: Mayor Prochaska Larry Kot Rodney Tonelli Clarence Holdiman Kathy Kohler Sandra Adams Bill Wedge Mike Anderson Lynn Dubajic Joe Besco Tom Lindblom Sue Swithin Andy Kubala Mike Schoppe Lisa Scherer Rich Sticka Ted King Rich Guerard COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - LAND USE Mayor Prochaska stated that at the next City Council, the first meeting in November, he would ask the City Council to accept the minutes. If anyone has any corrections please call Sandy Marker. Mayor Prochaska stated we will discuss the nuts and bolts of where we are going. He introduced Mr. Rodney Tonelli and turned the meeting over to Mr. Tonelli. 1. Mr. Tonelli stated he will give an overview of what we will be working toward over the next few months to get where we want to go, ending with designing neighborhoods. Mr. Tonelli stated he has heard good and bad comments and that is a good thing, and felt that meant we had been successful at the last meeting. He had invited those present to take note of other communities, and they will be discussed tonight. Tonight will be mostly an open discussion and the next couple of weeks will they will take a consensus and work to draft a proposal. together. II. A Design Base instead of Land Use is the goal here. We will utilize Plainfield's Comprehensive Plan from 1995 and Shorewood's,just completed plan, using three simple areas for a Land Use and Intensity Plan. Residential, Commercial and Industrial. Theses will break down into further categories of how to develop model communities into a plan. This is Use with Character of Design Guidelines. There will still be a map of uses, but thinking about Character and Design Guidelines. There will still be language and sample of Land Uses, but no reference to the type of use. It is based on regional planning. A mix of uses and other aspects in a complex way. The point is nowhere does it say Residential or Commercial, etc. Shorewood, which is a new plan, has a sector map with two primary sectors. The text will help work through where you want to 1 go. It can be simple or it can be complicated. There is more detail on the map. A more broad policy statement. Park Board Member Scherer stated that of the three models, Character is more complex. Mr. Tonelli stated there are 100 pages to understand what goes into a plan. Each has many pages to define the mix of uses, for example the downtown lacks open spaces, it would have a very Urban Characteristic. Auto Urban would be more intense, but distinct and Auto available. Think about each neighborhood, and design, and their connection to each other. This will be laid out and explained so everyone who buys it can understand it, because it is very complicated. Mayor Prochaska stated that as he understands it, it is hard to interpret the bottom one. Mr. Tonelli stated they are facing many proposals for plan that are outside of what our map shows. A new base map has a lot of expansion to the south. It will show how to expand to the south to Caton Farm Road, and to the southeast. We won't get into planning that area at this time, but will identify it for future growth. Through working on the current Comprehensive Plan and through discussions with staff, there will be more commercial along route 947, and expanded use, plans for a Metra Station. Lots of impact items, as Montgomery and Oswego have come closer and closer. We want to hear your thoughts and comments throughout the community as well as other categories. This is an information gathering. The challenge is boiling this all down to a plan of where you want to go. Voice your thoughts. Mayor Prochaska stated that for those who were here last time we looked at pods, and now we want to identify where Montgomery and Oswego are. The Mayor outlined our boundaries with Oswego and then with Plano. He stated he had also spoken to Kendall County and they are working on improvements to Galena Road and a future bridge over the Fox River to the south. We need to pick where we want to end and plan to the south and west and develop reasonable areas for our planning area. Looking at the YBSD map it shows over sizing of the sewers to the south, but not quite as far south as we want to plan for. Mr. Tonelli stated it is hard to plan land uses that far south, but we should show it as future growth. Mayor Prochaska stated they had discussions for the Industrial Area we now have to the west. We have a large targeted area set aside for Industrial use, and we are now seeing interest in this area. Mr. Tonelli stated this Industrial area should stay in the plan due to Aurora Blacktop's, ComEd and Enron facilities being already there. The past plan tired to deal buffers. Natural buffer is good, but other break points should be identified. That is important. Plan Commission Chairman, Lindblom asked about extending the commercial along route#47 to connect to the Industrial area to it's west. 2 Mayor Prochaska stated we have potential buyers who have mentioned commercial along Galena. Route#47 to the south will probably become a major commercial area. Mr. Tonelli stated that as areas grow we need to identify areas between major intersections that will be commercial, or maybe office, etc. The northeast area has more major immediate impact areas where it joins other towns and where they meet there. Plan Commission Chairman Lindblom asked about how the area west of route#59 in Aurora was planned as an industrial area with a very nice boulevard, and what zoning that is. Mr. Tonelli stated that is a planned Business Park with a PUD. Mayor Prochaska stated that Plano has mirrored our industrial area at Eldamain Road, north of the railroad tracks. It changes south of route#34, and Montgomery has higher density along with Oswego also having higher density. But, as you come to Yorkville it becomes nice, and south it is very open. Alderman Sticka asked if there is a way for us to plan for a business park such as the one discussed. Mr. Tonelli stated it is common to see adding several categories to include an Office Park, we should consider the relationship to the interstate as Naperville and Aurora have done with route #59. Park Board Member Scherer stated that we should all look at Randall Road. It was all green and very quickly it became all neon. Plan Commissioner Adams stated that route #47 could look the same when widened. Mayor Prochaska stated we may want to look at Galena also, and to see what Sugar Grove is planning. We may want to look south for an additional industrial area. Mr. Tonelli stated there are a limited number of businesses who are interested in bring thousands of employees, but trucking and warehouses are a type of business that will come. Explore so we know potential and so we can balance heavy and lite industry. Consider route #47 and the railroad too. Mayor Prochaska stated we have an area planned for Metra, with dense homes to promote residents who will walk to the train. We want to encourage that. We are one of the only communities who have planned for space to accommodate this. They favor a community who has a transit oriented plan in place, and then when they are ready they can seek the funding . Alderman Sticka stated the zoning is already done for this too. Mayor Prochaska stated, yes it has a floating zoning. 3 Alderman Kot asked about a 2nd option in case the population doesn't add up, then we may do something jointly with Plano. Mayor Prochaska stated there may be several sites considered. Oswego is looking for park and ride. We may look at the Eldamain area for that potential. Plan Commission Chairman Lindblom stated that if we look at the Oswego School District, and the calculations for projecting this for the next 10 years, we can see what is coming for us too. We need top transition for that need. Mayor Prochaska agreed, stating that our standards are higher and more land cash is required. WE have larger lots, but we do need to look at transition areas. Bristol Club will annex and will feature large home sites. Park Board Member Scherer stated that Park Board is looking at green space and those large home sites. Mayor Prochaska stated the density is 2.1 to 2.3 per acres. Some of Richard Marker's lots are 10,000 square feet , but they back to a huge open space. That is what we are looking for to come here. Mr. Tonelli stated that development formulas and standards for developers who propose smaller lots and what we require for allowing those smaller lots. We want to work through these processes. You have to have categories for townhomes, etc. , but what is required if you want to put in townhomes. Increased open space, etc. Create a standard requirement for more density. Present the plan in a basic format so everyone can understand it. Mayor Prochaska stated that we need to look at many intersection areas that are considered sleeper areas for future commercial development. Express your comments on how to mesh all these areas. In Oswego they have homes backing up to the railroad. Recreation Director, Sue Swithin stated this covers the heavy use, but what is the norm. Would the industrial put in more green? Mr. Tonelli stated that some do, but that many do the opposite. That is a design guideline we want to focus on. If you have specific thoughts on this, open space is always the answer, but then the questions is who maintains it. Plan Commission Chairman Lindblom we also have fast access to the interstate via route#126 to 1-55. Mayor Prochaska stated there is also other proposed access points such as I-80 and others. City Administrator Graff stated that roof tops counts are constantly in demand, and asked how we transition and add more low density. 4 Mr. Tonelli stated transition area is the key word. This is more than transition form industrial to townhomes to single family. We need to do a better job contemplating where and under what circumstances what design standards are going to be required. Transportation is the key to development, should we develop to the east with residential, and not show more commercial and access to commercial? Mr. Tonelli stated we also need to make distinct edges so when entering Yorkville is different. If development ran it's course, it would come, but what are the standards for open space, rural open space and a mix of commercial. Alderman Kot stated that we may be the only City anywhere near here who has horses across the street from City Hall. Mr. Tonelli stated that to preserve a rural feel isn't larger areas of open space, but more pockets of open space. Its a deign element, also buffer strips, but specifically design element. We should preserve farmsteads, even if they are different uses, preserve silos, split rails, open ditches. Mayor Prochaska stated we have some of those elements, and we have Agricultural zoning is the City too, plus Estate Zoning. Mr. Tonelli stated we could list this those thoughts in the plan, but this meeting won't go into how to do that, but it can make it a goal of the plan. Then when developers come in and there is a farmstead and silo on the site our standard stated it should preserve these, even if they have alternate uses. You want to see it preserved in the plan. Alderman Sticka asked his opinion on the City having density as it's most important issue. White Eagle has smaller lots, but they have a large amount of green space. We require 12,000 sq. ft. lots, but what about low density through open space. City Administrator Graff stated it is not lot size but overall density . Mr. Tonelli stated we could increase the requirement for open space. Next time we will try to incorporate ideas into a plan. We may have more intense pockets of space, but more open space. Shift the intensity. We will set the criteria with a comparative analysis. Mayor Prochaska state that Monday we will start looking a the focus group for the downtown and we don't want to forget downtown and re-development. We need to look at the areas down there for park space. Look are separate but identify areas. Mr. Tonelli stated Identify what different areas mean to you. If things just continue to grow you will have houses and strip malls. The River gives a potential for quality of improvement and overall character and improving that improves everything. Park Board Member Scherer stated the downtown could be a focal point for the City of Yorkville. 5 Mr. Tonelli stated that St. Charles and Geneva are desirable for an evening dinner, etc. and that translates to places where people want to shop and eat, etc. Ms. Kohler stated that parking is a detriment to the downtown. Mayor Prochaska stated there is a lot of parking downtown Ms. Kohler stated it needs lighted parking and landscaping Mr. Guerard stated that Yorkville offers a multiple product, and that PUD needs to be available in one area. We are a better community for allowing varied uses in the same area. Mr. Tonelli stated these are transitional areas The City Council and Plan Commission are to come to a consensus to allow it to happen. The rural look gives incentives to provide elements you want to see. Give a lost with options. The policy needs to start with the Comprehensive Plan. Deal with the other during the annexation process. Mayor Prochaska stated he agrees with mixed uses in one area keeping density and using techniques. Again Richard Marker and Heartland show what can be done. We don't want tot discourage that. Look for the uniqueness. Alderman Sticka stated that is great and he agrees, but the ordinance doesn't reflect that. So is the Comprehensive Plan a guide for changing the ordinance. Mr. Tonelli stated yes, it is still there for you to discuss and consider, but can also serve to develop an ordinance. Plan Commissioner Kubala asked if this is a plan to set a policy to encourage concept without specifics. Mr. Tonelli stated you can discuss specifics the next time with performance standards. We don't want to complicate this. Ms. Kohler asked if the City has an anti monotony ordinance in place. Mayor Prochaska stated no, we do not. City Administrator Graff asked what the next step is. Mr. Tonelli stated he will work on putting the plan on paper, and will get a draft ahead of the meeting so you can compare. City Administrator Graff stated we should have a draft in January. 6 Mr. Tonelli stated we may do another workshop in December, to encourage discussion and we should inform him on this. City Administrator Graff stated the would have the draft out in early January and then schedule a meeting. Meeting adjourned at 8:55 PM Minutes by Sandy Marker 7 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AREA A- r7 P jt4G a ri ZR MTE-WFV RE Fd Ii M�l1tER N0. f; Land Uses The Future Land Use Plan uses urban, auto-urban, suburban, and estate character types. The Future Land Use Plan is based on the mixes of development indicated in Table 3-2. Note the auto- urban character type has been divided into an auto-urban district(commercial and service business) and a business park district (industry, office, and other businesses). Table 3-2 VIA COMMUNITY CHARACTER AND LAND USE DISTRICTS Character District Residential Commercial Office & Industrial Urban Village Center 30% 400,0 30 0/'0 Auto-Urban Auto-urban 0% 100% 0 00 Business Park 0"o 0% 100% Suburban Village & Suburban 99% 1°'0 0% Estate Estate 100% 0% 0% Rural Park 0% 09 0 Rural/Vacant 0% 0/0 0% These dastncts residential compone nt provides a mix of single-family homes single-family cluster homes, and planned developments. Each would be permitted in each district as a matter of right, ensuring a wide range of housing opportunities is available for young families and elderly individuals or families in a ~"side range of housing types. Each housing option is designed to (� ensure the desired community character is achieved when areas are developed. Table 3-3 indicates the mix of dwelling unit types permitted in each district. Single-family development consumes nearly all the land with lots and roads. Buildings are traditional homes on single-family lots. The only open space consists of a detention pond or basin, and a small recreation area; the sum of this land rarely exceeds 10 acres on a 100 acre site. In Plainfield, single-family developments typically provide 5-10 percent open space. The cluster ' development is also a single-family detached development. The difference is that a significant amount of land is devoted to open space. This open space may be park land, natural areas, or a village green. The third development option is a planned development that contains a mix of dwelling unit types. The developer provides an increased amount of open space when compared to the single family development or cluster development. In return, the developer can build a variety of types of single-family detached or attached units. Multi-family units are also permitted. Combining a maximum density and a minimum amount of open space requirement means the character of the area is maintained regardless of the proposed development type. w Plamr'icl l Comprnzn.i�z Plan 3 Dccemhcr IS. I`Q5 Table 3-3 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL LAND USE AND ZONING DISTRICTS Open District/ Type Space Gross Net Densitv Lot Size Character Ratio Density (OSR) Estate/ Sin le-family 0.10 1.11 1.24 30,000 lust r Estate 0.30 1.30 2.29 15,000 C e Planned 0.60 1.75 5.14 7,000* Suburban/ Sin le-familv 0.10 2.06 2.29 15,000 Suburban Cluster 0.20 2.21 2.78 12,000 Planned 0.30 2.50 5.1.1 8,500* Village/ Single-family 0.10 2.78 12,000 Suburban- Cluster 0 2; 2.88 3.86 8,500' Planned 0.35 3.20 6.10 7,500* 7 Village Single 0.10 3.47 3.86 8,500 Center/ Urban Cluster 0.20 3.75 5.14 6,000 Planned 0.25 4.50 6.10 5,000* * Approximate average lot size. A m:x would ha%e both smaller and larger lots. Estate Landscaping and Open Space People who live in estate areas often desire a rural environment. Yet, all too often, the desired environment is borrowed open space from surrounding farmland. Landscape design techniques, such as horse fences and hedgerows,can promote a more rural character within the developments themselves. While the techniques can be used independently by each property owner, they are clearly more effective when a development has uniformity across each lot. Uniformity becomes even more important if the estate area is to separate freestanding communities. Fences of very similar appearance and style along the road boundaries can provide a rural characteristic; but if homes are crowded near the road, fences become simply cosmetic. Scenic easements along roads, particularly arterial and collector roads, provide a uniform character and increase building setbacks. Scenic easements should be at least 100 feet, preferably 200 feet, in width. Historically,estate areas 4 \ilhec ut Plair.tiel C mpnc�m c Plc December I j almost always had vegetation on the property's edge, greatly enhancing privacy. More recently, all the vegetation has been planted near the home. Figure 3-10 illustrates the difference in character. Open space in estate areas should be expansive. Along major roads, some open space should be devoted to scenic easements. Open spaces that provide long views are particularly desirable. Open space design and landscaping will be more beneficial if they screen development and make the homes less visible. Suburban Landscaping and Open Space Landscaping is critical to provide a balance between buildings and landscape and achieve the desired character. In the past, only a minimum of street trees has been required. In the farm fields surrounding Plainfield, achieving the needed balance without extensive landscaping is difficult. Suburban residential areas should require three types of landscaping: street trees, on-lot landscaping, and open space. First, more and larger trees must be required in the street rights-of-way. Street trees that arch over the road are an essential component of a traditional neighborhood; these elements will reinforce Plainfield's traditional nature. Second, the front yards of homes need more landscaping, particularly near the streets as in Figure 3-11. The increased front landscaping provides a sense of privacy. Buffers along major roads that screen developments are also important whether they are required buffer yards or simply rear lot line landscape treatments. Third, the open space area can be natural, maintained as active recreation land, or designed as more formal village greens. Wherever possible, open space landscaping should provide substantial tree masses that assist in maintaining landscape volumes that are larger than building volumes. Preserving stream corridors and planting trees is also a desirable strategy in natural areas. Plainfield must limit the trend of increasingly larger homes on lots of any size. The Village should establish a maximum size home for any lot type. This strategy ensures the lot/house/landscape balance is fitting for suburban character. Manv suburbs have had problems with truing to address the scale of new or infill housing. Plainfield can keep this potential problem in check by using a floor area, building coverage, or impervious surface ratio on residential lots. Auto-urban Streetscape Design Auto-urban environments tend to consist of busy streets fronted by parking lots and signs. Because buildings are pushed back behind their parking lots, the entire street is devoted to the automobile. Most people have a general dissatisfaction with this type of environment. This concern can be approached in two ways. The least dramatic requires street trees and landscaping to screen automobiles from view. In addition, landscaping in the parking lot and building fronts is needed to humanize auto-urban development. A more radical form of streetscape approach requires street trees,sidewalks, and a heavily landscaped street yard. In addition, buildings are to be built nearer to the street with the parking relegated to the rear. With the buildings near the street, signs can be more tasteful and smaller as viewing distances are drastically reduced. 113_c of PIainnci,l Connprehcnsr,r P!jn Dcccmbcr I, 191)� Figure 3-10 CHARACTER CHANGE FROM EDGE TO NEAR-HOME LANDSCAPING LAWN FENCE OR HEDGEROW 3'-4' TALL (TYP.) STREET SHRUBS AND LANDSCAPING AROUND FOUNDATION OF HOUSE SCATTERED SHADE TREES LAWN STREET village of Plainfield Comprehensoe Plan 1-16 December 18. 199> Figure 3-11 GROUPING LANDSCAPING NEAR FRONT OF LOTS CURRENT REQUIREMENT.- 1, 3'—caliper tree per 50' or 1 per lot Creates unequal spacing and a nonuniform appearance PROPOSED REQUIREMENT.- 1, 3"—caliper tree per 50' and required front yard landscaping Front yard landscaping provides a sense of privacy, while equal tree spacing creates a more uniform appearance Creating Nodes or Places Having auto-urban sprawl along all major road frontages is of little use. Extensive strip development along major roads provides the impression that a community is auto-urban in character. For example,most people think of Schaumburg, Illinois as "strip development and the mall". The fact that quality neighborhoods may exist is buried by the visual retention of the commercial development. One may zone large blocks of land for commercial, office, or industrial development without stripping off the road frontage. By creating nodes at specific locations, auto- urban areas are provided without using the entire frontage. The Village must provide for landscaping and buffering along major roads in areas where auto-urban is not permitted. Such a practice will ensure a sound development pattern is established in these areas. Village of Plainfield Comrrehenswe Plan December IF lag` ' t Urban Design and Mixed Use An urban area is the most difficult to develop. A whole series of constraints works against urban areas in today's automobile-dominated societv. An urban area operates best when it provides a quality pedestrian environment; it must be an attractive area where people enjoy walking. To eliminate urban abandonment after working hours, a wide range of uses and activities must be provided after 5 p.m. High to medium density residential should be part of the urban area to enhance the pedestrian area activities. The urban designer must make the urban setting (or area) a desirable place in which to live -- sometimes not an easy task. To do so means incorporating pleasant urban spaces for residents' various recreation activities as well as an enjoyable I environment for shoppers and business customers. Orientation to water is beneficial. In addition, a comfort level in all seasons should be maintained. As a result, some portions of urban areas are enclosed. The urban space must be something more than a standard street. Linking streets to squares, plazas, ` or other urban spaces is one approach. Residential uses should be concentrated where they can borrow views of, as well as enjoy, these spaces. Pedestrians should have access to these spaces with minimal risk from crossing streets. Major arterials should feed the urban area edges; only local traffic should traverse the interior space. The space and street configuration, together with attractive and interesting streetscapes, help create a desirable image for urban places. A mix of uses that promotes use during a greater part of the day should be required. Pedestrian Precinct In newly developing areas, designers have a freedom to reconsider and redesign the automobile- pedestrian relationship. Despite claims that streets with automobiles are desirable, ample evidence ' indicates pedestrians are more active in malls and small pedestrian enclaves when they do not have to compete with automobiles. In addition, pedestrians are sensitive to distance. Pedestrians find walking more than 600 feet inconvenient. Therefore, parking should be less than 300 feet from the ' pedestrian precinct entrances. Malls are designed with anchors or magnets on each end to force people to walk. The quality of the experience will also mitigate distance impact. A high-quality pedestrian precinct encourages longer walking trips because visitors find the walk pleasant. Peoples' reluctance to switch modes also allows greater walking distances coupled with an enjoyable environment. The traditional grid street also makes visitors reluctant to switch modes, but it restricts the pedestrian to inefficient movement patterns -- one of the reasons older urban areas have often failed to compete with shopping centers. I' \illace o! Plainlicld Comprehen;ne Nan .R December IS. 190 Map 3-2 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN Route 30 Route 59 IS I LAND USE � I DIS'LR1CI5 � I 119th 1' Village Center I 1 - Auto-urban Business Park I I 135th Street I I — Village&Suburban 1 � Estate l l 1 I Park/Open Space Route MV 4 I ' I Rural I e � I I ® Waterbodies QD us �ea o CL J Existing Land Use - Interstate 55 Streets/Roadways Caton Farm Road I Village of Plainfield Comprehensive Plan 3-31 December 18,1995 PART 111 A PLAN FOR THE FUTURE Land Use Plan The land use plan for the Village of Shorewood is broken into two components designed to cooperatively achieve the overall goals of the community as applied to each distinct planning sector. The first component of the plan is a general land use element (Illustration 6)which establishes fundamental land uses for all lands within the Village's planning area. The second component is a set of planning and design guidelines for each of a number of identified planning sectors. For the purposes of land use planning, these sectors can be thought of as overlays to the general land use plan. Each planning sector represented in Illustration 7 is established in order to provide more specific development and design guidelines for specific uses within that sector. For example, residential uses as represented on the land use plan may occur in various sectors, however, the type, intensity and character of these uses will vary form sector to sector. Residential uses within the Traditional Neighborhood Sector are to be developed quite differently from residential uses within the Shorewood Living Sector. Utilizing both the traditional land use plan component in conjunction with the planning and design guidelines of each unique sector enables the Village to not only set policies for general development, but also to identify the unique planning, design and character that it envisions for different areas of the Village. The planning sectors contained within this plan are established to respond to the comprehensive planning factors previously identified. Comprehensive Planning and Design Sectors Traditional Neighborhood/Town Center Sector The purpose of the Traditional Neighborhood/Town Center Sector is to encourage the development of mixed use, compact neighborhoods that are designed to preserve the natural features and amenities of a site while facilitating the efficient use of Village services. The Traditional Neighborhood District (TND) seeks to satisfy the social, recreational and commercial needs of its residents through the integration of diversified land uses. The Traditional Neighborhood District is a type of sustainable development that creates viable economic opportunities, a sense of community and place, and social equity for its inhabitants. The Traditional Neighborhood District seeks to emulate the development patterns that were prevalent in the United States from early colonial times through the end of World War II. The Traditional Neighborhood District consists of two components - The Traditional Town Center Commercial District and the Traditional Neighborhood Residential District. These Districts are characterized as follows: SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 30 I • A human scale of development oriented toward pedestrian activity; • Integration of commercial, residential and recreational uses that provide its residents with a variety of housing opportunities,workplaces, shopping, services, public facilities and recreational amenities; • Development that preserves and enhances the neighborhood's natural features and resources in the neighborhood's park and recreation system; • A rectilinear street and block pattern designed with sensitivity to the natural landscape; • Urban design standards that allow for the compatibility of buildings and other neighborhood features as determined by their arrangement, bulk,form, character and landscaping that aid in establishing livable communities; • Architecture and landscaping that are consistent with the small town character associated with the Village of Shorewood; • Civic buildings,town squares,village greens,and other public facilities that create a sense of place and community identity, enhancing the Village of Shorewood's small town character; • An attractive streetscape that is oriented toward pedestrian activity but encourages the safe and efficient use of the automobile; Criteria for Traditional Neighborhoods All Traditional Neighborhood Districts (TND) should be considered under the following criteria: • Size and Scale • Integration of Uses • Open Space • Street Layout and Design • Development Pattern • Architectural Design • Civic Uses • Streetscape SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 31 Geographic Components A Traditional Neighborhood District is comprised of the geographic components found below. Every geographic unit has its own context in which to be considered for the criteria outlined above. The geographic units are as follows: • The Town • The Town Center • The Neighborhood • The Individual Lot The following pages will describe each of the geographic units in the context of the Criteria for Traditional Neighborhoods outlined above. The Town Size and Scale The Town should consist of an area of no less than 40 contiguous acres but no greater than 640 contiguous acres (one square mile). This limited size allows for a human scale of development that is pedestrian friendly.This scale provides for a distance of no greater than one-half mile from the Town Center to any property within the Town. A distance of one-half mile (roughly 2,500 feet) equates to a walking time of approximately 10 minutes (Figure 1). From neighborhood edge to neighborhood edge, no property is greater than one mile or a 20 minute walk (one mile) from one another. Integration of Uses The Town is the largest geographic component of the Traditional Neighborhood District. Uses within the Town include, but are not limited to, all commercial and residential uses, regional open space, neighborhood parks and greenways,civic buildings and town squares. It is the purpose of the Traditional Neighborhood District to integrate these uses to foster an accessible and pedestrian friendly environment. Open Space The Town's open space is a prominent feature and a central component to the TND. The Town park land is comprised of regional open space such as forest preserves, prairies and agricultural uses,greenways,community parks, neighborhood parks and town squares. Not less than 20% of the Town's area should be dedicated to open space. Greenways should not be less than an average of 50 feet wide and should connect all of the Town's open space uses where possible. SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 32 Street Layout and Design Street design should be done in such a way to cater to the pedestrian. However, it is realized that the automobile is a reality and must be accommodated with minimal conflict. Arterial streets, collectors, and local streets comprise a hierarchy of streets that should be designed in a rectilinear and interconnected fashion. It is imperative in the design of this hierarchy that orderly and efficient traffic flow is achieved at reduced speeds as to encourage pedestrian activity. There are several ways in which traffic speed can be reduced without restricting flow, including interconnected streets that are complemented by traffic calming devices that may include alternative street designs that are varied in size. Alternative street designs also can provide a sense of character and identity to the neighborhood as opposed to typical suburban development. Boulevards and T-intersections are examples of alternative street designs (Figures 2 and 3). In any instance, cul-de-sacs should be greatly discouraged (Figure 4). f f 6 SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 33 tiTy*r:..•rIA! I, ;:w �.�i:•-ldr l t a r.1.'.,<:.=^ice a .+�«. rl rC'.::`.� .•..zr..1...,�v�.`..a�=w':::r`~i.i��i 1t'�ft!• �rE.'AYr♦_ ♦ •:\,:4•.,+,^-__' '.J-•-n"I i%. � `�,:mow:N•.C.\:J• c.=�._�•.�r «:,:` . ♦ .� �:l:'3 . . 1.•• < r !• �.ate: \x�, .:1`•:^� ,'`r.P _� ;3"�r_r1 fix;,-:�N^�IP.�r•'r�,41'�S", a '`'V�•.•a�~�'..ni r�'.:1..r"•r, I , f rt�.y''1 ti'�4`N�Y Sa'...:I.•�C. `,�a=rY t�:'•�'.l'.cam:�f it�•ti �'•�•:":�:`' :�r�_i}.as.`�" •_.\. . .vim::�4. .. ..^.' .,`l t.i�^•.••t• at Cj• •.�,•�• 4:.a: ~•" 1 Towne Center ZA s 1 �fv «. . •%.. v. •��: 7•���a iS.w�a�'� ti:^t•�`.:y.• f \ \ •�����•�'•r��R.�•�:r'a.:•Y•.�:.a...a4 :w...'•y_-"`. .c;. .:. ter" ♦ •cam .•i���.�:� ;,�:�.. :` a,\, ••r.`:.ti'c;. �a-r-•..1-�';r�^ir�1l:rS Sw.-ti.C'w �.rti,.;.. .•� )�:`M1�. n_w..• „Trri.. •a � v .f •..::.1a r- •.•♦,; sue♦.^.J v%:':'..:. ..�. as 4.•�.1`"::•,l. .l� ,•a••,I`i'i`.e:• •'..lr:'(r'� ♦ .^. •L�••:�.. . Ir. Y:y.:�-•n.-� ,�*.,'�',;♦•N ���FZ.��♦��:.w�_.:�.C-�•....♦.?iti..°i•fir"v. •-••'•a .fir f': . t. • Y' • w i w•.�..a. Figure 1. Ten Minute Walking Distance SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Figure 2. T-Intersection and Square I I ( I Figure 3. Rotary and Boulevard SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 35 Am Cn 'n O = O1 '~ ``1 i --------- ----------- --� 0 ti 1 C) N I `, 1 t O 0 K Q m h hood Park I I I m Z cn CL t t m t I 1 t I 1 _0 C" 1 I I Z CCD I I CD Towr CD I I j I l Cf CIa� I (n r CD v ' CD I (n• f el orAood Park it 1 1 ercial � I I I i -----------------_-------- PREFERRED bI5COURAGEU v co Development Pattern The development pattern for the Town generally will consist of a Town Center in which most civic and commercial activities will occur (Figure 5). There will be limited residential uses within the Town Center. The Town Center will be surrounded by higher density mixed residential uses and smaller neighborhood commercial type uses that may include a corner market or cafe. Surrounding the residential neighborhoods will be what is known as the neighborhood edge. It is this area which defines the transition between the higher density uses in and adjacent to the Town Center and the hinterlands where regional open space and agricultural uses rmay occur. The neighborhood edge would consist primarily of traditional single family homes on larger lots (greater than 10,000 square feet). ' Interwoven through the Town will be open space including neighborhood and community parks that are linked via a greenway system. As noted previously, at least 20% of the ' Town's area should be dedicated to public open space. Architectural Design ' Architectural design at the Town level is very broad. In general, each of the geographic components have specific architectural elements to be considered dependent on function. Architectural elements to be considered for any structure include compatibility with existing development, human scale, pedestrian friendliness and the integration of uses. Civic Uses Civic uses are very important to the successful development of a TND. It is the fabric from ' which a neighborhood is woven. A civic meeting place is required as a part of the TND. It is a place that is available to the public and located in a common area such as a square, park, or other suitable open space location. Preferably, the main civic building should be flocated in the Town Center. Streetscape ' Streetscape design is one of the most defining elements of a TND. Streetscapes should be designed to achieve an effective balance between the automobile and the pedestrian. The streetscape should be characterized by abundant trees and landscaping, comfortable sidewalks, variable amenities such as decorative lamp posts and street furniture, allowances for on-street parking, and a uniform and attractive building design (Figure 6). ' SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 37 Edge Residential Mixed Residential Town Center - Figure 5. Development Pattern SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 38 ,it CokUMUAL sTREETScAK RCMrnu.STRa-TSCAK Figure 6. Streetscapes SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 39 The Town Center Size and Scale The Town Center is the focal point for the entire TND. There is no set standard for its size, though in most instances the Town Center should comprise no greater than 10%of the total land area. The relatively small size and scale of the Town Center encourages easy pedestrian access from the adjacent residential developments to the various retail, commercial, service and civic uses that are associated with this central area. Integration of Uses The Town Center is highly integrated and includes uses associated with traditional downtown development. Town Center uses may include a post office, restaurants, taverns, outdoor cafes, banks, hotels, doctors' and lawyers' offices, churches and civic uses. Retail and other commercial uses should generally be located immediately adjacent to the central square that is described below. Apartments and lofts are located on the second floors of these establishments and are uses which are highly encouraged. The Town Center is designed in a way that facilitates pedestrian movement between the Town Center and the mixed residential areas on its periphery. Open Space Open Space should be a prominent feature of the Town Center. There should be both formal and informal open space readily accessible to those who live in, work in or visit the Town Center. The formal component of the Town Center's open space comes in conjunction with the town square described below under Civic Uses. Although a square contains more of a paved surface than traditional open space, an adjacent green provides a compliment to the town square. Also prominent in the open space design of the Town Center are the greenways and pedestrian/bicycle trails that connect the Town Center to its residential periphery and into regional open space areas. Street Layout and Design The Town Center is heavily traveled by the pedestrian and the automobile. It is important then that the street network be designed in such a way to minimize conflict between the two, yet allow for the necessary automobile traffic that helps to assure the commercial viability of the Town Center. The street design in the Town Center (Figure 4) allows for an arterial street that is fed by several smaller collectors. Traffic flow is easily managed though at a somewhat reduced speed due to the alternative radial designs that emanate from the town square. This is an important traffic calming mechanism that offsets the potential for automobile/pedestrian conflict. An alternative design for a Town Center is shown in Figure 7. This design allows for a major SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 40 regional retail anchor and parking associated with this type of use. The parking would be buffered from the road via outlots and heavy berms or landscaping. Adjacent would be the traditional town square surrounded by typical Town Center commercial, civic and institutional uses. The streets would project from the Town Square parallel to the arterials to form a typical urban grid pattern. -F- n� ch L 41 am i w� � d ac •i Z } - I _ 1 'L JJJ j U Figure 7. Alternative Town Center Design Incorporating Regional Commercial Uses SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 41 i Development Pattern The development pattern of the Town Center is consistent with that described in the Town section of this Plan (Figure 5). The Town Center is primarily made up of commercial and limited residential uses surrounding the Town Square designed for recreational and civic uses. The Town Center serves as a meeting place and economic center of the TND. The Town Center's development pattern is a direct result of these functions. Architectural Design The architectural design of the Town Center should reflect traditional downtown main street form. Buildings should be at least two to three stories in height (25 to 35 feet) and should be designed to accommodate office, retail or residential uses. All construction should conform to the street orientation and massing of adjacent structures, regardless of use. In any instance all entrances should face the street and be clearly articulated through the use of detailing. General guidelines include that buildings should avoid long, monotonous, uninterrupted walls or roof planes. To implement this guideline,the facade of a building should be divided into distinct modules not greater than 100 feet. Corner buildings should use special architectural features such as towers, cupolas, balconies, etc. to give emphasis to the importance of its location. Civic Uses Civic buildings should be located throughout the Town Center. A civic building and/or landmark should be located prominently in a central square located at or near the geographic center of the TND. Civic uses include government offices, libraries, museums, schools and churches. Civic uses within the town square serve as a meeting place for the TND and provides a sense of community and place. Streetscape Streetscape within the Town Center is of utmost importance. It is the area with the highest density of uses in the TND and therefore the most traffic, both pedestrian and automobile. Street furniture, wide sidewalks, trees and landscaping are a part of the streetscape. However, in the Town Center additional factors must be considered in the streetscape including actual structures. Commercial buildings should provide awnings, covered walkways or similar weather protection to provide an additional measure of pedestrian comfort (Figure 6). I SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 42 I The Neighborhood Size and Scale The size of an individual neighborhood varies and is dependent on site geography and design. Integration of Uses Neighborhoods other than the Town Center are generally residential. The housing stock in a mixed residential neighborhood should vary from apartments, condominiums or itownhouses to duplexes and suburban single family homes on larger lots at the neighborhood edge. Interspersed among these residential uses may be an occasional bookstore or restaurant, preferably located near the intersection of two collector streets. In all cases, the Town Center, neighborhood commercial uses and recreational/civic uses should be no greater than a five-minute (one-quarter mile) walk in any direction. Open Space Neighborhood parks and open space are a requirement in a TND. There are several forms of open space within a neighborhood including a formal neighborhood square or green, parks and playgrounds within a residential block, and greenways. A neighborhood park should be no less than 10,000 square feet in size and all lots in a residential neighborhood should be within 600 feet (2 '/2 minute walk) of a park. Greenways should be utilized throughout a neighborhood. Generally, a greenway follows natural features such as ravines, creeks or streams. Their use therefore may be dependent on the geography of a site and the presence of a watercourse or other natural feature. Bike and pedestrian trails should be encouraged within the greenway to maximize its use. Greenways can be used to connect neighborhood parks and greens, in addition to providing an automobile free route to the Town Center. Street Layout Design The street layout of a mixed residential neighborhood should promote pedestrian activity while allowing for the safe and efficient flow of automobile traffic. This is done through a variety of traffic calming measures described previously in the Town Center section of this Plan. Development Pattern The development pattern in the mixed residential neighborhood is reflective of the desire to provide the ease of pedestrian movement, the integration of land uses and community and civic interaction.The development pattern in.a mixed residential neighborhood consists SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 43 i of all varieties of housing constructed around or near a neighborhood center with greenways and local parks interspersed within the neighborhood to encourage pedestrian movement. IArchitectural Design I Buildings in residential neighborhoods should incorporate the architectural styles, building materials and colors of surrounding buildings. To ensure privacy, finished floor elevations should be at least two feet above grade. Buildings should be no greater than twice the Iheight and massing of adjacent structures. These features provide for the compatibility of architecture while allowing for flexibility in design and encouraging community interaction. ICivic Uses I As in the Town Center, civic uses should be prominent features in a neighborhood. Although not as grand in scale as civic uses in the Town Center, a civic building and/or landmark can be located prominently In a neighborhood square. Civic uses in a I neighborhood could include government offices, libraries, museums,schools and churches, but at a smaller scale than those found in the Town Center. Civic uses within the neighborhood square serve as a meeting place for residents and provides a sense of community and place to that neighborhood. Streetscape Streetscape in the neighborhood is defined by the pedestrian. Unlike the Town Center, the Neighborhood is not as reliant on the automobile. The streetscape in the Neighborhood should foster the relationship between the pedestrian or resident and the community. Narrower rights-of-way, wider sidewalks, lesser building setbacks and significant landscaping within the parkway encourage interaction between the pedestrian and the environment (Figure 6). Such a design also reduces the distance between homes on opposite sides of a street, again fostering interaction between residents and encouraging a sense of community. The Individual Lot Size and Scale The size and scale of the individual lot vary dependent upon the use. A commercial use in the heart of the Town Center may be served by a lot of less than 2,500 square feet, whereas a residential lot in the Neighborhood Edge area may be as large as an acre (43,560 square feet). In either case, it is important that the size and scale of an individual lot be flexible to appropriately reflect the intensity of a proposed use. SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 44 Integration of Uses The individual lot is the smallest component of the TND. However, it plays an important role in determining the successful integration of diversified land uses. The design of the individual lot and its amenities should encourage the integration of uses through appropriate architectural design and lot layout.These issues are discussed further under Development Patterns. Open Space Individual lots should be designed in a way so that they may easily access or have views of open space. No lot should be located more than 600 feet from a neighborhood park, nor greater than 1200 feet from a neighborhood center and no more than 2,500 feet from the town square. Individual lots should have ready access to greenways that link the individual lot to the open space not only in its immediate neighborhood but to the entire TND and the regional open space that lays beyond the neighborhood edge. Street Layout and Design The relationship of lots to streets is very important to the lot's interaction with the surrounding neighborhood. All lots should front a public street. The street is a public realm which provides access to the private individual lots whether they be residential or business lots. Emphasis must be placed on the aesthetic and functional connection of this private area to the public way. In addition to streets the use of alleys may be considered. The use of alleys in residential areas provides access to detached garages and an alternative to on- street parking. Alleys in commercial areas provide areas for mid-block connections, rear entrances to buildings and a less disruptive area for off street loading. Development Pattern The development pattern for individual lots should reflect the lesser setbacks required in a TND compared to traditional zoning. This provides for closer relationships between buildings and their occupants, while allowing for limited automobile traffic. In residential areas, the garage should be set back from the home facade to reduce its prominence in the streetscape (Figure 8). All lots should be within walking distance of or be adjacent to open space in the form of neighborhood parks, town or neighborhood squares and greenways. Neighborhood and Town Center commercial uses should also be readily accessible via greenways or uninterrupted sidewalks. It is the needs and functions of the individual lot that influences the development pattern of the TND. Architectural Design The architectural design of buildings on individual lots will vary according to the property and the tastes of the builder. Generally, buildings should be designed in such a way as to Page 45 SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN maximize the relationship of the building to the lot and the public way. Considerations in architecture should be given to the following areas: • Aesthetic role of the building in the streetscape • Connection from private realm to public realm • Functional and logical access from public ways to private structures for all modes of transport (i.e., pedestrians, vehicles, etc.) In residential areas, these objectives may be accomplished by a detached or a recessed attached garage (Figure 8). In a commercial area, a building may be designed with a rear entrance to provide access to parking located behind the building, so as to "hide" automobile traffic while maintaining an entrance on the front facade for pedestrian traffic accessing the structure from the street. In both residential and non-residential development, emphasis should be placed on architectural elements such as roof lines, porches, porticos, awnings and other such architectural treatments which will enhance a buildings character and presence in the streetscape. Civic Uses Individual lots may be used for civic uses in addition to those found in the town and neighborhood squares. Civic uses, like commercial and recreational uses,should be readily accessible to the individual lot. Streetscape Individual lots play an important role in determining the streetscape of a neighborhood.The private building defines where the streetscape ends and the private space of the individual lot begins. The placement of buildings at the required front yard setback provides for uniformity in the streetscape. Landscaping and the.architectural design of individual lots provides desired variety within the streetscape while maintaining a definitive boundary between public and private uses. SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 46 ■ 1 I DISCOURAGED ALTERNATIVES HOUSE mmim I I I '9 A m y I 10'-2a my Figure 8. Discouraged and Preferred Residential Site Design SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 47 Shorewood Living Sector ISize and Scale Developments in the Shorewood Living Sector will vary in size from small parcel 1 developments to large master planned neighborhoods. Lot sizes of developments within this sector shall be consistent with the requirements of the Village's R-1 zoning district. Integration of Uses IThe Shorewood Living Sector is intended for predominantly single-family residential use and only those other uses which may be permitted by zoning to exist in a residential neighborhood. Open Space Open spaces shall be provided in the form of neighborhood parks and the preservation of natural resource areas. The Village Master Park and recreation plan should be consulted for the location and scale of open spaces. Bike trails and open space linkages should be provided for wherever possible and consistent with other Village plans. 1 Street Layout and Design Street layout and design shall be per the requirements of the Village's adopted ordinances on such matters. Development Pattern Development in the Shorewood Living sector should occur contiguously to existing developments. Developments should be designed so as to blend cohesively with one another. Architectural Design Homes in this sector are expected to be predominantly custom and semi-custom homes that present the desired architectural and aesthetic character of the community. SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 48 Town to Town Transitional Sector The Town to Town Transitional Sector is established to provide for transitional density and housing that can occur between the housing typical of the Shorewood Living Sector and the smaller lot, production housing being constructed to the north in Joliet. Shorewood's goals include developing neighborhoods within this sector that are compatible with the neighboring areas but include design details and features that brand such neighborhoods with a character and quality that is distinctly Shorewood. Size and Scale Developments in the Town to Town Transitional Sector will vary in size from small parcel developments to large master planned neighborhoods. Developments in this sector will likely occur as planned unit developments. Within this transitional area a departure from the minimum R1 zoning requirements may be allowed. However, any reduction in the minimum R1 standards that may be achievable shall be considered only in the context of developments that meet the following objectives: • Incorporate strong or creative land planning techniques • Provide and integrate open space or other public lands in an exceptional manner • Provide and incorporate the use of landscaping and streetscaping within neighborhoods I to create high impact aesthetic benefits • Provide quality architectural details in the offering of models and elevations in the subdivision • Ensure that front yard (front elevation) landscaping is provided for each lot Integration of Uses The Town to Town Transitional Sector is intended for predominantly single-family residential use and only those other uses which may be permitted by zoning to exist in a residential neighborhood. Open Space IOpen spaces shall be provided in the form of neighborhood parks and the preservation of natural resource areas. The Village Master Park and Recreation Plan should be consulted for the location and scale of open spaces. Bike trails and open space linkages should be provided for wherever possible and consistent with other Village plans. Because of the potential of smaller lots and higher densities in this sector, detailed attention shall be given to the use and designed integration of open spaces within neighborhoods. SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 49 Street Layout and Design M Street layout and design shall be per the requirements of the Village's adopted ordinances on such matters. Development Pattern Development in the Town to Town Transitional Sector should occur contiguously to existing developments. Developments should be designed so as to blend cohesively with one another. Special attention should be given to the overall quality of the land plan and the inclusion of high quality landscape features. Subdivision entrances should be designed to create a distinctly Shorewood identity. Architectural Design Homes in this sectorare expected to be predominantly production and semi-custom homes. Homes should include landscaping plans that create an improved streetscape consistent with the envisioned character of the Village. Homes should strictly follow anti-monotony rules and be offered in enough styles and elevations to maintain the unique residential character of the Village of Shorewood. Route 59 Corridor and Route 52 The Route 59 arterial corridor will include a mix of uses. Large areas of commercial and retail as well as some limited industrial uses are planned in the corridor. Residential uses that are currently existing are also large frontage holders of this corridor. Special screening and landscaping attention should be given to uses developing in this corridor. Unifying architectural and streetscaping design features should be developed for the corridor. The Corridorshould incorporate pedestrian and bicycle linkages to adjoining neighborhoods and other destination nodes. Illinois Department of Transportation Strategic Regional Arterial standards should be applied to access control along the corridor. Village Gateway locations should be created throughout the us of community signage, uniform streetscaping materials, and public art. See ILLUSTRATION 8 for an overview of corridor enhancement potentials. ' SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 50 Wikaduke Trail (Ridge Road) Corridor The WIKADUKE Trail Corridor will be developed new arterial corridor in the Village's west planning area. The corridor will contain a mix of land uses including retail/commercial, industrial, and residential as shown on the land use plan. Access, setbacks and site development should be consistent with Illinois Department of Transportation Strategic Regional Arterial Standards. Scenic highway elements in the corridor should be maximized and preserved. Nodal developments and neighborhood development patterns should be encouraged rather than strip commercial and residential pods. Functional pedestrian and bicycle linkages to neighborhoods and nodal destinations should be provided. Corridor design guidelines and streetscaping requirements should be established to create high quality aesthetic features. Interstate Development Sector The Interstate Development Sector is intended to provide areas for employment generating uses. Development in this sector should be in the form of business parks and campuses. Campus like settings should strive to include positive aesthetics through high quality site planning and landscaping and design. The influence and usage of the interchanges should be maximized to the economic benefit of the Village as a whole. Special setback, landscaping and buffering requirements should be developed for buffering neighboring non-residential uses. Certain parcels adjacent to the 1-55/Route 59 interchange are identified in a sub-area plan for development as an up-scale, corporate office center and a location for certain upscale retail and commercial uses. These are is identified with this plan as the "Crossroads Corporate Center". SHOREWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Page 52 I I i - ,_.... � � _ _ � M`�i ul = :,1, 1.;;.1•.1=: g: :_ . 1 "� �'�' I�,, 11.ate �2's��i)/ •.vJ; �ijY �'. - 1�u.�E°' �II�� �.i►fir ,•alo u�, �. If WA IfW IMP , .. ..:. Ittt�t ry�`,..,d r a = I�`''-_.n:S:"' �`lli +� ■IY7•��,11;�j���_ ';'r' • - � • - � Y,: `�� � `ref; '� .� '=ii -'�%���__ ��� _ tll ���.I� ��;ti_- • _ {�� �� � {r .. ,: ,.... - I�.i '�_ 't•■SIP '•lf� .� r E/Il,i 1��__—- --�\�,�t� - � rgr F i r '47 Lei 01 zz ,; .. I�� _ y ,, I,, .1111 � • it -, -.��?. �' `'"' • - • \` it _?_` I �!� ��',n '•; In .+,11 `��� ' , ' •�{, ;��1 Imo`+�::.`'' _ ��� �'' I 4 ���■��/E`?.a... �■�!z���l �� y i `� � �� 'i '��9•.;= ►':•:'� III y ��, >> _:€ ._ ij,'/ i IL ,," �c�, � 'i �b a �r tf�y.'~ i • � I � � �t f ~'�►�� /!ate i5y� —— ._. 1 _ �'� ` ,�i/l1� �/:� '�'�/.���-°�i.' "': may:omm�. am• i 4 1 � s .. ,�.��..•;�\ ! I'Inn _c f, j�'y`�, �� • .,j, ,,SV��:�:ew�����..I \ v � :'iis.7dyQ 9 i� ,e.r�� (I�*S f' �.,. _ �t.J. ■''. � ICS ,.'EC- -' tJ 4 . I� x so + tal •` -,__ .-_.J`� 1.1. v/.. _i 'I "\ 'i .fir 'i.4j„ �� tm 1, ' "w � _ I/� IIIKI r4� •"',� - �\:+ w/=.i .�� I:li..•_ �IIMIME\ I WON" IT AIIIIIIIIIII Ml W Ili r- t�i ��\[\[ 'I� �:1J � � r .r - 1 - � w • w. ' r •;, o.urn. ., . � - - �s/Hite ���_�•D I %/ _ .- .;....,_� -- - --- I,.M.:Ylwln ..a 1♦ = � arc � �' ■ •- I � a'I=\ �u,L` e.� ally' � :<•'_` " ,61/ �- • f . �� �:+Ins= ��•� aR sad"... r ' 'Lv�wnIllOa eaw.i:SY<.1.: